UNITED STATESSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWashington, D.C. 20549-1004FORM 10-Q[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006, or [ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to .Commission file number: 1-3754GMAC LLC(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
INDEXGMAC LLC
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income (unaudited) GMAC LLC" -->
3
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet (unaudited) GMAC LLC" -->
4
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders Equity (unaudited) GMAC LLC" -->
5
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows (unaudited) GMAC LLC" -->
6
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) GMAC LLC" -->
7
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)GMAC LLCpertaining to residential mortgage in our ResCap reporting segment, auto finance in our North American Operations reporting segment and commercial mortgages. We have elected to measure our residential mortgage servicing rights at fair value for each reporting date and report changes in fair value in earnings during the period in which the changes occur. At June 30, 2006, these assets were valued at $5.1 billion and recorded separately on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. Refer to Note 6 for further information.For our servicing assets and liabilities related to our auto finance and commercial mortgage classes of assets, we have elected to continue to use the amortization method of accounting. As a result of the sale of Capmark on March 23, 2006, the commercial mortgage servicing rights are no longer recorded on our balance sheet at June 30, 2006. Our auto finance servicing assets and liabilities at June 30, 2006, totaled $18 million and $24 million, respectively, and are recorded in other assets and other liabilities, respectively, on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.Recently Issued Accounting StandardsStatement of Position 05-1 In September 2005 the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) issued Statement of Position 05-1, Accounting by Insurance Enterprises for Deferred Acquisition Costs in Connection with Modifications or Exchanges of Insurance Contracts(SOP 05-1). SOP 05-1 provides guidance on accounting for deferred acquisition costs on internal replacements of insurance contracts. SOP 05-1 defines an internal replacement and specifies the conditions that determine whether the replacement contract is substantially or unsubstantially changed from the replaced contract. An internal replacement determined to result in a substantially changed contract should be accounted for as an extinguishment of the replaced contract and unamortized deferred acquisition costs and unearned revenue liabilities of the replaced contract should no longer be deferred. An internal replacement determined to result in an unsubstantially changed contract should be accounted for as a continuation of the replaced asset. SOP 05-01 introduces the terms integrated and non-integrated contract features and specifies that non-integrated features do not change the base contract and are to be accounted for in a manner similar to a separately issued contract. Integrated features are evaluated in conjunction with the base contract. SOP 05-1 is effective for internal replacements occurring in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. Management is assessing the potential impact on our financial condition or results of operations.Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 155 In February 2006 the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 155, Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments an amendment of FASB Statements No. 133 and 140 (SFAS 155). This standard permits fair value remeasurement for any hybrid financial instrument that contains an embedded derivative that otherwise would require bifurcation. SFAS 155 allows an entity to make an irrevocable election to measure such a hybrid financial instrument at fair value on an instrument-by-instrument basis. The standard eliminates the prohibition on a QSPE from holding a derivative financial instrument that pertains to a beneficial interest other than another derivative financial instrument. SFAS 155 also clarifies which interest-only and principal-only strips are not subject to the requirements of SFAS 133, as well as determines that concentrations of credit risk in the form of subordination are not embedded derivatives. SFAS 155 is effective for all financial instruments acquired or issued after the beginning of the fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006. Management is assessing the potential impact on our financial condition or results of operations.FASB Staff Position FIN 46(R)-6 In April 2006 the FASB issued FIN 46(R)-6, Determining the Variability to Be Considered in Applying FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)which requires the variability of an entity to be analyzed based on the design of the entity. The nature of and risks in the entity, as well as the purpose for the entitys creation are examined to determine the variability in applying FIN 46(R). The variability is used in applying FIN 46(R) to determine whether an entity is a variable interest entity, which interests are variable interests in the entity and who is the primary beneficiary of the variable interest entity. This statement is applied prospectively and is effective for all reporting periods after June 15, 2006. Management is assessing the potential impact on our financial condition or results of operations.FASB Interpretation No. 48 In June 2006 the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (FIN 48) which supplements Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 109 by defining the confidence level that a tax position must meet in order to be recognized in the financial statements. The Interpretation requires that the tax effects of a position be recognized only if it ismore-likely-than-notto be sustained based solely on its technical merits as of the reporting date. Themore-likely-than-notthreshold represents a positive assertion by management that a company is entitled to the economic benefits of a tax position. If a tax position is not consideredmore-likely-than-not to be sustained based solely on its technical merits, no benefits of the position are to be recognized. Moreover, themore-likely-than-notthreshold must continue to be met in each reporting period to support continued recognition of a benefit. At adoption, companies must adjust their financial statements to reflect only those tax positions that aremore-likely-than-not to be sustained as of the adoption date. Any necessary adjustment would be recorded directly to retained earnings in the period of adoption and reported as a change in accounting principle. This Interpretation is effective as of the beginning of the first fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2006. Management is assessing the potential impact on our financial condition or results of operations.8
8
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)GMAC LLC
9
10
11
12
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)GMAC LLCThe components of servicing fees were as follows for the six months ended June 30, 2006:
13
14
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)GMAC LLCLiquidity FacilitiesLiquidity facilities represent additional funding sources, if required. The financial institutions providing the uncommitted facilities are not legally obligated to fund such amounts. The following table summarizes the liquidity facilities maintained by us, excluding Capmark.
15
16
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)GMAC LLCBalance SheetA summary of the balance sheet effect of transactions with GM and affiliated companies is as follows:
17
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)GMAC LLCRetail and lease contracts acquired by us that included rate and residual subvention from GM, payable directly or indirectly to GM dealers as a percent of total new retail and lease contracts acquired, were as follows:
18
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)GMAC LLCresidual support programs, GM also participates in a risk sharing arrangement whereby GM shares equally in residual losses to the extent that remarketing proceeds are below our standard residual rates (limited to a floor).In connection with the agreement to sell a 51 percent ownership interest in GMAC, GM settled its estimated liabilities with respect to residual support and risk sharing on a portion of our operating lease portfolio (approximately 19% of the North American Automotive Finance operating lease portfolio) and on the entire U.S. balloon retail receivable portfolio in a lump-sum payment. As of April 30, 2006, the maximum amount that would have been paid under the residual support and risk sharing arrangements with GM on this portion of the portfolio totaled approximately $2.0 billion. A negotiated amount totaling approximately $1.1 billion was agreed to between GM and GMAC to settle the expected amount (based on expected remarketing performance of the vehicles) to be paid by GM under these leases and was paid to us on May 15, 2006. The payment of $1.1 billion was recorded as a deferred amount in accrued expenses and other liabilities in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet and will be treated as sales proceeds on the underlying assets, as the contracts terminate and the vehicles are sold at auction, in recognizing the gain or loss on sale.For the remainder of the operating lease portfolio, not subject to this payout arrangement, based on June 30, 2006 outstandings, the current amount that we would expect to be paid by GM under residual support programs would be $1.5 billion. These projections would be paid over the remaining life of the lease portfolio at the time of sale of the related vehicle (on average approximately 2 years) and are based on the expected remarketing performance of the vehicles. The maximum that could be paid under the residual support programs on this portion of the lease portfolio is approximately $2.6 billion and would be paid only in the unlikely event that the proceeds from this portion of the operating lease portfolio are lower than both the contractual residual value and our standard residual rates. The maximum amount that could be paid under the risk sharing arrangements on the remaining lease portfolio is approximately $1.4 billion and would only be paid in the unlikely event that the proceeds from the outstanding lease vehicles would be lower than our standard residual rates. As disclosed in Note 2, certain assets with respect to automotive leases will be dividended to GM prior to consummation of the agreement.In addition, as it relates to a portion of lease originations (approximately 19% of North American Automotive Finance lease originations) and all U.S. balloon retail contract originations occurring after April 30, 2006, GM agreed to begin payment of the expected residual support owed to us at the time of contract origination as opposed to after contract termination at the time of sale of the related vehicle. The amount paid is based on the historical remarketing experience of the vehicles. Upon sale of the related vehicle after contract termination, GM and GMAC will settle the amount of actual residual support payment owed based on the actual sales proceeds received and GM will pay to us amounts owed related to the risk sharing arrangements, if any. After the sale of a 51 percent ownership interest in GMAC is completed, all new operating lease originations will be subject to this revised residual support arrangement with GM. For the affected contracts originated in the second quarter of 2006, GM paid or agreed to pay us a total of $65 million for contracts originated in May and June. The remaining maximum exposure after consideration of these payments that could be paid under these contracts for residual support is approximately $43 million and would be paid only in the unlikely event that the proceeds from this portion of the operating lease portfolio are lower than both the contractual residual value and our standard residual rates. The remaining maximum amount that could be paid under the risk sharing arrangements on these contracts is approximately $174 million and would only be paid in the unlikely event that the proceeds from the outstanding lease vehicles would be lower than our standard residual rates.In addition to the financing arrangements summarized in the foregoing table, GM has a $4 billion revolving line of credit from us that expires in September 2006. This credit line is used for general operating and seasonal working capital purposes and to reduce external liquidity requirements. As of June 30, 2006, and December 31, 2005, there were no amounts outstanding on this line.19
19
20
21
Managements Discussion and AnalysisGMAC LLC" -->
22
Managements Discussion and AnalysisGMAC LLC Automotive FinanceOur Automotive Finance operations offer a wide range of financial services and products (directly and indirectly) to retail automotive consumers, automotive dealerships and other commercial businesses. Our Automotive Finance operations are comprised of two separate reporting segments North American Automotive Finance Operations and International Automotive Finance Operations and certain corporate activities. The products and services offered by our Automotive Finance operations include the purchase of retail installment sales contracts and leases, extension of term loans, dealer floor plan financing and other lines of credit to dealers, and fleet leasing. Refer to pages 21-31 of our 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K for further discussion of the business profile of our Automotive Finance operations.Results of OperationsThe following table summarizes the operating results of our Automotive Finance operations for the periods indicated. The amounts presented are before the elimination of balances and transactions with our other reporting segments.
23
Managements Discussion and AnalysisGMAC LLCThe provision for credit losses increased in comparison to the prior year largely due to increases in provisions within the North American Operations consumer loan portfolio. The increase in the loss provision is consistent with the increase in delinquencies in the North American Operations portfolio. Refer to the Credit Risk discussion within this Automotive Finance Operations section of the MD&A for further discussion.Other income increased for both the second quarter and first six months of 2006, as compared to the same periods in 2005. An increase in interest income realized from cash reserve balances as a result of higher short term interest rates in 2006 versus 2005 contributed to the increases over the prior year. In addition, non-interest expenses increased in comparison with 2005 levels due to a decrease in operating lease remarketing results and an overall decrease in lease termination volume.Total income tax expense declined by $119 million and $46 million in the second quarter and first six months of 2006, respectively, as compared to the same periods in 2005. These decreases were largely due to a reduction in pre-tax income and enacted changes in Canadian corporate and provincial tax rates and the elimination of the large corporation tax for the North American Automotive operations.Automotive Financing VolumeThe following table summarizes our new vehicle consumer financing volume, our share of GM retail sales and our wholesale financing of new vehicles and related share of GM sales to dealers in markets where we operate.
24
Managements Discussion and AnalysisGMAC LLCConsumer CreditThe following tables summarize pertinent loss experience in the consumer managed and on-balance sheet automotive retail contract portfolio. In general, the credit quality of the off-balance sheet portfolio is representative of our overall managed consumer automotive retail contract portfolio. The off-balance sheet portfolio includes receivables securitized and sold that we continue to service and in which we retain an interest or risk of loss but excludes securitized and sold finance receivables that we continue to service but in which we retain no interest or risk of loss. The process of creating a pool of retail finance receivables for securitization or sale typically excludes accounts that are greater than 30 days delinquent at such time. In addition, the process involves selecting from a pool of receivables that are currently outstanding and, therefore, represent seasoned accounts. A seasoned portfolio that excludes delinquent accounts historically results in better credit performance in the managed portfolio than in the on-balance sheet portfolio of retail finance receivables. In addition, the current off-balance sheet transactions are comprised mainly of subvented rate retail finance receivables, which generally attract higher quality customers (or otherwise cash purchasers) than customers typically associated with non-subvented receivables.The managed portfolio includes retail receivables held on-balance sheet for investment and receivables securitized and sold that we continue to service and have a continued involvement in (i.e., in which we retain an interest or risk of loss in the underlying receivables) but excludes securitized and sold finance receivables that we continue to service but have no other continuing involvement (serviced-only portfolio). We believe that the disclosure of the credit experience of the managed portfolio presents a more complete presentation of our risk of loss in the underlying assets (typically in the form of a subordinated retained interest). Consistent with the presentation in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet, retail contracts presented in the table represent the principal balance of the finance receivables discounted for any unearned rate support received from GM.
25
Managements Discussion and AnalysisGMAC LLCThe following table summarizes pertinent delinquency experience in the consumer automotive retail contract portfolio.
26
Managements Discussion and AnalysisGMAC LLCThe following table summarizes activity related to the consumer allowance for credit losses for our Automotive Finance operations.
27
Managements Discussion and AnalysisGMAC LLCCommercial CreditOur credit risk on the commercial portfolio is markedly different than that of our consumer portfolio. Whereas the consumer portfolio represents a homogenous pool of retail contracts that exhibit fairly predictable and stable loss patterns, the commercial portfolio exposures are less predictable. In general, the credit risk of the commercial portfolio is tied to overall economic conditions in the countries in which we operate.At June 30, 2006, the only commercial receivables that had been securitized and accounted for as off-balance sheet transactions represent wholesale lines of credit extended to automotive dealerships, which historically experience low charge-offs. Since only wholesale accounts have historically been securitized, the amount of charge-offs on our managed portfolio is the same as the on-balance sheet portfolio. As a result, only the on-balance sheet commercial portfolio credit experience is presented in the following table:
28
Managements Discussion and AnalysisGMAC LLC ResCapThe principal activities of our ResCap operations involve the origination, purchase, servicing, sale and securitization of consumer (i.e., residential) and commercial mortgage loans and mortgage related products (e.g., real estate services). Typically, mortgage loans are originated and sold to investors in the secondary market, including securitization transactions in which the assets are legally sold but are accounted for as secured financings. For additional information, please refer to ResCaps quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006, filed separately with the SEC, which report is not deemed incorporated into any of our filings under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act.Results of OperationsThe following table summarizes the operating results for ResCap for the periods indicated. The amounts presented are before the elimination of balances and transactions with our other reporting segments.
29
Managements Discussion and AnalysisGMAC LLCMortgage Loan Production, Sales and ServicingOur mortgage loan production increased to $47.0 billion for the three months ended June 30, 2006, compared to $42.6 billion for the same period in 2005. These increases were primarily a result of increases in domestic market share. The domestic mortgage origination markets was estimated to be $1.3 trillion for the six months ended June 30, 2006, a decline of 6.1% compared to the comparable period in 2005. The market share growth continues to be achieved through effectively changing our product offerings and pricing in our market.The following summarizes mortgage loan production for the periods indicated.
30
Managements Discussion and AnalysisGMAC LLCAllowance for Loan LossesThe following table summarizes the activity related to the allowance for loan losses:
31
Managements Discussion and AnalysisGMAC LLC Insurance OperationsOur Insurance operations insure automobile service contracts and underwrite personal automobile insurance coverages (ranging from preferred to non-standard risks) and selected commercial insurance and reinsurance coverages. Refer to pages 42-45 of our 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K for further discussion of the business profile of our Insurance operations.Results of OperationsThe following table summarizes the operating results of GMAC Insurance for the periods indicated. The amounts presented are before the elimination of balances and transactions with our other operating segments.
32
Managements Discussion and AnalysisGMAC LLCincrease in interest and dividend income in our portfolio of invested assets. The market value of the investment portfolio was $7.7 billion at June 30, 2006, compared to $7.5 billion at June 30, 2005.Total expenses increased 14% in the second quarter of 2006 as compared to the same period in 2005, and 11% for the first six months of 2005 over the same period in 2005. The increases were commensurate with higher insurance premiums and service revenue earned and an increase in amortization of deferred acquisition costs. OtherOther operations is comprised of our Commercial Finance Group, equity interest in Capmark, certain corporate activities related to the Mortgage Group, and reclassifications and elimination between the reporting segments.Results of OperationsNet income for GMACs Other operations is summarized as follows:
33
Managements Discussion and AnalysisGMAC LLCOur most critical accounting estimates are: Determination of the allowance for credit losses Valuation of automotive lease residuals Valuation of mortgage servicing rights Valuation of interests in securitized assets Determination of reserves for insurance losses and loss adjustment expensesThe adoption of SFAS 156 as of January 1, 2006, requires us to present our servicing rights at fair value for those classes of servicing rights for which we have elected the fair value method.There have been no other significant changes in the methodologies and processes used in developing these estimates from what is described in our 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Refer to Note 1 for further discussion of the impact of adopting this standard. Funding and LiquidityFunding Sources and StrategyOur liquidity and our ongoing profitability is, in large part, dependent upon our timely access to capital and the costs associated with raising funds in different segments of the capital markets. Over the past several years, our funding strategy has focused on the development of diversified funding sources across a global investor base, both public and private and, as appropriate, the extension of debt maturities. In addition, we maintain a large cash reserve ($22.7 billion at June 30, 2006) including certain marketable securities that can be utilized to meet our obligations in the event of any market disruption. From time to time, we repurchase previously issued debt as part of our cash and liquidity management strategy. This multi-faceted strategy, combined with a continuous prefunding of requirements, is designed to enhance our ability to meet our obligations.The diversity of our funding sources enhances funding flexibility, limits dependence on any one source of funds and results in a more cost effective strategy over the longer term. In developing this approach, management considers market conditions, prevailing interest rates, liquidity needs and the desired maturity profile of our liabilities. This strategy has helped us maintain liquidity during periods of weakness in the capital markets, changes in our business or changes in our credit ratings. Despite our diverse funding sources and strategies, our ability to maintain liquidity may be affected by certain risk factors. Refer to Risk Factors for further discussion on risk factors.34
34
Managements Discussion and AnalysisGMAC LLCThe following table summarizes our outstanding debt by funding source, excluding Capmark balances, for the periods indicated:
35
Managements Discussion and AnalysisGeneral Motors Acceptance Corporationformation of ResCap. ResCap, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary, was formed as the holding company of our residential mortgage businesses and in the second quarter of 2005 successfully achieved an investment grade rating (separate from GMAC). To date, ResCap has issued $12.2 billion in public and private unsecured debt and closed a $3.5 billion syndication of its bank facilities. The syndication, which closed in July 2005, consisted of a $1.75 billion syndicated term loan; an $875 million syndicated line of credit committed through July 2008 and an $875 million syndicated line of credit committed through July 2007. In the fourth quarter of 2005, ResCap filed a $12 billion shelf registration statement in order to offer senior and/or subordinated debt securities and has issued $7.2 billion in unsecured debt to date from this shelf. In May 2006 $1.7 billion was issued off of this shelf which was comprised of two tranches, GBP 400 million and EUR 750 million. The proceeds from bond transactions were used to repay the intercompany subordinated note to us, thus providing additional liquidity.As previously disclosed, on March 23, 2006, we completed the sale of 78% of our equity in GMAC Commercial Mortgage. Under the terms of the transaction, we received $8.8 billion at closing which is comprised of sale proceeds and repayment of intercompany debt, thereby increasing our liquidity position and reducing the amount of funding required. Please refer to Note 1 of our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further details.The change in focus in the funding strategy has allowed us to maintain adequate access to capital and a sufficient liquidity position despite reductions in and limited access to traditional unsecured funding sources (i.e., commercial paper, term debt, bank loans and lines of credit) due to the deterioration in our unsecured credit rating. Unsecured sources most impacted by the reduction in our credit rating have been our commercial paper programs, the term debt markets, certain bank loan arrangements primarily at ResCap and our International Automotive operations, as well as Fannie Mae custodial borrowing arrangements at ResCap.A further reduction of our credit rating could increase borrowing costs and further constrain our access to unsecured debt markets, including capital markets for retail debt. In addition, a further reduction of our credit ratings could increase the possibility of additional terms and conditions in any new or replacement financing arrangements and impact elements of certain existing secured borrowing arrangements. However, our funding strategy has increased our focus on expanding and developing diversified secured funding sources and increased use of automotive whole loan sales that are not directly impacted by ratings on our unsecured debt.With limited access to traditional unsecured funding sources, management will continue to diversify and expand our use of asset-backed funding and we believe that our funding strategy will provide sufficient access to the capital markets to meet our short- and medium-term funding needs. Notwithstanding the foregoing, management believes that the current ratings situation and outlook increases the level of risk to our long-term ability to sustain the current level of asset originations. In an effort to mitigate this risk, on April 3, 2006, GM announced that it agreed to sell a 51 percent controlling interest in us to a consortium led by Cerberus Capital Management, which is expected to close in the fourth quarter of this year. In addition to continuing to enable us to support the sale of GM vehicles, the transaction is intended to support our strategic goal of a stable investment grade rating and profitable growth. In connection with the targeted fourth quarter sale closing, we expect to arrange two asset-backed funding facilities that total up to $25 billion, which will support our ongoing business and enhance our liquidity position. A $10 billion facility is expected to be available before closing and the other facility is expected to be available on or after closing. Citigroup has committed $12.5 billion in the aggregate to these two facilities. The funding facilities are in addition to Citigroups initial equity investment in us. There can be no assurance that the sale transaction will be successful in achieving a stable investment grade rating and therefore we plan to maintain the current conservative funding strategy until risks to closing the transaction are reduced.Credit RatingsThe cost and availability of unsecured financing is influenced by credit ratings, which are intended to be an indicator of the creditworthiness of a particular company, security, or obligation. Lower ratings generally result in higher borrowing costs as well as reduced access to capital markets. This is particularly true for certain term debt institutional investors whose investment guidelines require investment grade term ratings and for short-term institutional investors (money markets in particular) whose investment guidelines require the two highest rating categories for short-term debt. Substantially all of our debt has been rated by nationally recognized statistical rating organizations. Concerns over the competitive and financial strength of GM, including how it will fund its burdensome health care liabilities and uncertainties at Delphi Corporation, have resulted in a series of credit rating actions, which commenced late in 2001. In the second and third quarters of 2005, Standard & Poors, Fitch and Moodys downgraded GMACs (excluding ResCap) senior debt to anon-investment grade rating with DBRS continuing to maintain an investment grade rating on our senior debt. As a result of GMs announcement on October 17, 2005, that it was exploring the possible sale of a controlling interest in us to a strategic partner, the four rating agencies changed our review status to either evolving or developing. Most recently, on March 16, 2006, Moodys placed our senior unsecured ratings under review for a possible downgrade following GMs announcement that it would delay filing its annual report on36
36
Managements Discussion and AnalysisGMAC LLCForm 10-K with the SEC. Following the April 3, 2006, announcement by GM that it agreed to sell a 51 percent controlling interest in us, Fitch revised our rating watch status to Positive from Evolving, indicating that the ratings may be upgraded or maintained at current levels.The following summarizes our current ratings, outlook and the date of last rating action by the respective nationally recognized rating agencies.
37
Managements Discussion and AnalysisGMAC LLC Off-balance Sheet ArrangementsWe use off-balance sheet entities as an integral part of our operating and funding activities. For further discussion of our use of off-balance sheet entities, refer to the Off-balance Sheet Arrangements section in our 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K.The following table, which excludes Capmark balances, summarizes assets carried off-balance sheet in these entities.
38
Managements Discussion and AnalysisGMAC LLCmore-likely-than-notto be sustained based solely on its technical merits as of the reporting date. Themore-likely-than-notthreshold represents a positive assertion by management that a company is entitled to the economic benefits of a tax position. If a tax position is not consideredmore-likely-than-not to be sustained based solely on its technical merits, no benefits of the position are to be recognized. Moreover, themore-likely-than-notthreshold must continue to be met in each reporting period to support continued recognition of a benefit. At adoption, companies must adjust their financial statements to reflect only those tax positions that aremore-likely-than-not to be sustained as of the adoption date. Any necessary adjustment would be recorded directly to retained earnings in the period of adoption and reported as a change in accounting principle. This Interpretation is effective as of the beginning of the first fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2006. Management is assessing the potential impact on our financial condition or results of operations. Consolidated Operating ResultsThe following section provides a discussion of our consolidated results of operations as displayed in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income. The individual business segment sections of this MD&A provide a further discussion of the operating results.RevenuesTotal revenue increased by $410 million and $922 million, respectively, in the second quarter and first six months of 2006, compared to the same period of 2005, primarily due to increases in operating lease income, revenue from mortgage loans held for sale and mortgage consumer interest income. Mortgage originations increased to $47.0 billion in the second quarter from $42.6 billion in the prior period. These increases were partially offset by a decline in auto consumer revenue.Interest and discount expense increased by $769 million and $1,329 million in the second quarter and first six months of 2006, as compared to the same period of the prior year. This increase is primarily the result of the negative impact of higher funding costs due to an increase in overall market interest rates. The provision for credit losses increased for the second quarter of 2006 by $84 million.Insurance premiums and service revenue earned increased by 13% and 12% in the second quarter and first six months of 2006 as compared with the same period in 2005, as a result of the acquisition of MEEMIC, growth in the extended service contract line, reinsurance assumed business and international personal lines operations. Gain on sale of mortgage and automotive loans increased due to higher overall loan production and increased volume of off-balancesheet securitizations versus on-balance secured financings.Investment income decreased by $106 million and $98 million in the second quarter and first six months of 2006, respectively, as compared to the same period in the prior year. The decreases are primarily driven by lower capital gains recognized and an increase in losses on U.S. Treasury and principal-only securities during the first half of 2006. Gain on sale of equity investments increased by $411 million in the second quarter and first six months of 2006 as compared to the same period in the prior year. The increase is primarily driven due to the sale of our equity interest in a regional homebuilder during the second quarter of 2006.ExpensesNoninterest expense increased by $197 million, or 5% in the second quarter of 2006 and $529 million, or 7% for the first six months of 2006, as compared to the same period in the prior year. Depreciation expense on operating lease assets increased during the second quarter and first six months of 2006, as a result of higher average operating lease asset levels as compared to the same period of 2005. In addition, other operating expenses increased due to a decrease in the gains realized on the disposal of off-lease vehicles.39
39
Managements Discussion and AnalysisGMAC LLC Forward Looking StatementsThe foregoing Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and other portions of this Form 10-Qcontains various forward-looking statements within the meaning of applicable federal securities laws, including the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, that are based upon our current expectations and assumptions concerning future events, which are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated.The words anticipate, estimate, believe, expect, intend, may, plan, project, future and should and any similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements involve a number of risks, uncertainties and other factors, including (but not limited to) the Risk Factors described in Item 1A of our 2005 Form 10-K, as updated in this Form 10-Q, and which may be revised or supplemented in subsequent reports on SEC Forms 10-Q and8-K. Such factors include, among others, the following: the ability of GM to complete the previously announced transaction with a strategic investor regarding a controlling interest in us while maintaining a significant stake in us, securing separate credit ratings and low cost funding to sustain growth for us and ResCap and maintaining the mutually beneficial relationship between us and GM; changes in economic conditions, currency exchange rates, significant terrorist attacks or political instability in the major markets where we operate; changes in the laws, regulations, policies or other activities of governments, agencies and similar organizations where such actions may affect the production, licensing, distribution or sale of our products, the cost thereof or applicable tax rates; and the threat of terrorism, the outbreak or escalation of hostilities between the United States and any foreign power or territory and changes in international political conditions may continue to affect both the United States and the global economy and may increase other risks.40
40
Controls and Procedures GMAC LLC" -->
41
Other Information GMAC LLC" -->
42
Other InformationGMAC LLC Our residential mortgage subsidiarys ability to pay dividends and to prepay subordinated debt obligations to us is restricted by contractual arrangements. A failure of or interruption in the communications and information systems on which we rely to conduct our business could adversely affect our revenues and profitability. We use estimates and assumptions in determining the fair value of certain of our assets, in determining our allowance for credit losses, in determining lease residual values and in determining our reserves for insurance losses and loss adjustment expenses. If our estimates or assumptions prove to be incorrect, our cash flow, profitability, financial condition and business prospects could be materially adversely affected. Our business outside the United States exposes us to additional risks that may cause our revenues and profitability to decline. Our business could be adversely affected by changes in currency exchange rates. General business and economic conditions of the industries and geographic areas in which we operate affect our revenues, profitability and financial condition. Our profitability and financial condition may be materially adversely affected by decreases in the residual value of off-lease vehicles. Fluctuations in valuation of investment securities or significant fluctuations in investment market prices could negatively affect revenues. Changes in existing U.S. government-sponsored mortgage programs, or disruptions in the secondary markets in the United States or in other countries in which our mortgage subsidiaries operate, could adversely affect the profitability and financial condition of our mortgage business. We may be required to repurchase contracts and provide indemnification if we breach representations and warranties from our securitization and whole loan transactions, which could harm our profitability and financial condition. Significant indemnification payments or contract, lease or loan repurchase activity of retail contracts or leases or mortgage loans could harm our profitability and financial condition. A loss of contractual servicing rights could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, liquidity and results of operations. The regulatory environment in which we operate could have a material adverse effect on our business and earnings. The worldwide financial services industry is highly competitive. If we are unable to compete successfully or if there is increased competition in the automotive financing, mortgage and/or insurance markets or generally in the markets for securitizations or asset sales, our margins could be materially adversely affected.Other Information" -->
43
Signatures" -->
44
Index of Exhibits GMAC LLC" -->
45
Index of ExhibitsGMAC LLC
46