Apogee Enterprises - 10-Q quarterly report FY

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For Quarterly Period Ended December 2, 2006

Commission File Number 0-6365

APOGEE ENTERPRISES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (952) 835-1874

Not Applicable

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer  ¨    Accelerated filer  x    Non-accelerated filer  ¨    

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act)    Yes  ¨    No  x

As of January 4, 2007, 28,363,202 shares of the registrant’s common stock, par value $0.33 1/3 per share, were outstanding.

Table of Contents

APOGEE ENTERPRISES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(unaudited)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

3

Table of Contents

CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

(unaudited)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

4

Table of Contents

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(unaudited)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

5

Table of Contents

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited)

The consolidated financial statements of Apogee Enterprises, Inc. (we, us, our or the Company) included herein have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The consolidated financial statements and notes are presented as permitted by the regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (Form 10-Q) and do not contain certain information included in the Company’s annual financial statements and notes. The information included in this Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended February 25, 2006. The results of operations for the three and nine-month periods ended December 2, 2006 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.

In the opinion of the Company, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the financial position as of December 2, 2006 and February 25, 2006, and the results of operations for the three and nine-month periods ended December 2, 2006 and November 26, 2005 and results of cash flows for the nine-month periods ended December 2, 2006 and November 26, 2005.

The Company’s fiscal year ends on the Saturday closest to February 28. Each interim quarter ends on the Saturday closest to the end of the months of May, August and November. The three and nine-month periods ended December 2, 2006 consisted of 13 weeks and 40 weeks, respectively, while the three and nine-month periods ended November 26, 2005 consisted of 13 weeks and 39 weeks, respectively.

The Company restated its fiscal 2006 consolidated statement of cash flows to separately disclose the operating, investing and financing portions of the cash flows attributable to discontinued operations, which in prior periods were reported on a combined basis as a single amount. In addition, certain prior-year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.

In November 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 151, Inventory Costs (SFAS No. 151), an amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 43, Inventory Pricing. SFAS No. 151 requires all companies to recognize a current-period charge for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs and wasted materials. The statement also requires that the allocation of fixed production overhead to the costs of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. This new standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company adopted SFAS No. 151 in the first quarter of fiscal 2007 and it did not have an impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

During December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (Revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (SFAS No. 123R), which replaces SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and supercedes APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.SFAS No. 123R requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options and stock-settled stock appreciation rights (SARs), to be recognized in the financial statements based on their fair values beginning with the first fiscal year beginning after June 15, 2005 (as delayed by the Securities and Exchange Commission). Effective February 26, 2006, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 123R using the modified prospective transition method. As a result of adopting SFAS No. 123R, the Company recognized $0.7 million and $1.7 million of incremental compensation expense for the three and nine months ended December 2, 2006, respectively. Results for prior periods have not been restated. See Note 3 in the notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48), to create a single model to address accounting for uncertainty in tax positions. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for income tax by prescribing a recognition threshold that a tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the consolidated financial statements. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, measurement, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company will adopt FIN 48 as of March 4, 2007, the beginning of the Company’s fiscal year 2008, as required. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of FIN 48 on its consolidated financial statements.

6

Table of Contents

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS No. 157). This statement clarifies the definition of fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands the disclosures on fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, the Company’s fiscal year 2009. The Company has not determined the impact, if any, the adoption of this statement will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans – an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R) (SFAS No. 158). SFAS No. 158 requires the recognition of the funded status of a defined benefit plan in the statement of financial position, requires that changes in the funded status be recognized through comprehensive income and expands disclosures. Additionally, SFAS No. 158 requires employers to measure the funded status of a plan as of the date of its year-end statement of financial position, which is a change from the Company’s present measurement date of December 31. The recognition and disclosures under SFAS No. 158 are required as of the end of the fiscal year ending after December 15, 2006 while the new measurement date is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2008. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of SFAS No. 158 on its consolidated financial statements.

The 2002 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan and the 1997 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan provide for the issuance of 3,400,000 and 2,500,000 shares, respectively, for various forms of stock-based compensation while the 1987 Stock Option Plan provides for the issuance of 2,500,000 options to purchase Company stock (collectively, the Plans). On June 28, 2006, the shareholders approved the Amended and Restated 2002 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan to increase the number of shares for issuance under the plan from 1,800,000 to 3,400,000. Awards under these Plans, either in the form of incentive stock options, nonstatutory options or stock-settled stock appreciation rights, are required to be granted with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the Company’s stock at the date of award. Nonvested share awards are also included in these Plans. Outstanding options issued to employees generally vest over a four-year period, outstanding SARs vest over a three-year period and outstanding options issued to directors vest at the end of six months. Outstanding options and SARs have a 10-year term. Nonvested share awards generally vest over a three or four-year period. The 1987 Stock Option Plan expired by its terms in 1997, and the 1997 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan was terminated in January 2006; no new grants may be made under either plan, although vesting and exercises of options and vesting of nonvested share awards previously granted thereunder will still occur in accordance with the vesting periods of the various grants.

The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 123R in the first quarter of fiscal 2007 under the modified prospective method. SFAS No. 123R eliminates accounting for share-based compensation transactions using the intrinsic value method prescribed in APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and requires instead that the fair value of all share-based transactions, including grants of employee stock options, be recognized in the financial statements. Under the modified prospective transition method, stock-based compensation expense for the three and nine months ended December 2, 2006 includes: (a) compensation expense estimated for the period for all stock-based compensation awards granted prior to, but not yet vested as of February 25, 2006, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the original provisions of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and (b) compensation expense for all stock-based compensation awards granted subsequent to February 25, 2006, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123R estimated for the period. Total stock-based compensation expense included in the results of operations for the nine months ended December 2, 2006 and November 26, 2005, was $4.2 million and $1.3 million, respectively. In accordance with the modified prospective transition method of SFAS No. 123R, financial results for the prior period have not been restated.

As a result of adopting SFAS No. 123R on February 26, 2006, the Company’s earnings before income tax expense and net earnings for the three months ended December 2, 2006, were $0.7 million and $0.5 million lower, respectively, and for the nine months were $1.7 million and $1.2 million lower, respectively, than if it had continued to account for stock-based compensation under APB Opinion No. 25. If the Company had not adopted SFAS No. 123R, its basic and diluted earnings per share for the three and nine months ended December 2, 2006 would have been increased by $0.02 and $0.04, respectively. In accordance with SFAS No. 123R, the Company also reclassified unearned compensation for nonvested share awards of $4.7 million into additional paid-in capital. The cumulative effect adjustment for forfeitures related to nonvested share awards was not material.

Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, the Company reported all tax benefits resulting from the exercise of stock options as operating cash flows in its consolidated statements of cash flows. In accordance with SFAS No. 123R, for the nine months ended December 2, 2006, the Company revised its statement of cash flows presentation to report the

7

Table of Contents

excess tax benefits from the exercise of stock options as financing cash flows. For the nine months ended December 2, 2006, $1.5 million of excess tax benefits were reported as financing cash flows rather than operating cash flows. Cash proceeds from the exercise of stock options were $3.5 million and $2.6 million for the nine months ended December 2, 2006 and November 26, 2005, respectively.

The following table shows the effect on net earnings and per share data had the Company applied the fair value expense recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, to stock-based employee compensation during the three and nine-month periods ended November 26, 2005.

The weighted average fair value per option at the date of grant for options granted in fiscal 2007 and 2006 was $6.53 and $6.71, respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value of options (the amount by which the stock price on the date of exercise exceeded the stock price of the option on the date of grant) exercised during the nine months ended December 2, 2006 and November 26, 2005 was $1.5 million and $1.3 million, respectively.

The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions used for grants through the third quarter of fiscal 2007 and 2006, respectively.

The expected stock price volatility is based on historical experience. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury Strip rate whose term is consistent with the expected life of the Company’s stock options. The expected life, the average time an option grant is outstanding, and forfeiture rates are estimated based on historical experience.

8

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the stock option and SAR transactions under the Plans for the nine months ended December 2, 2006:

In fiscal 2006, the Company implemented a new executive compensation program (the New Program). The New Program provides for a greater portion of total compensation to be delivered to key employees selected by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors through long-term incentives using performance shares and SARs. Performance shares are issued at the beginning of each fiscal year in the form of nonvested share awards. The number of shares issued at grant is equal to the target number of performance shares and allows for the right to receive an additional number of shares based on meeting pre-determined Company performance goals.

The following table summarizes the nonvested share award transactions, including performance shares, under the Plans for the nine months ended December 2, 2006:

At December 2, 2006, there was $5.4 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested share awards which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 40 months. The total fair value of shares vested during fiscal 2007 was $0.5 million.

9

Table of Contents

The following table presents a reconciliation of the denominators used in the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share.

In fiscal 2001, the Company and PPG Industries, Inc. (PPG) combined their U.S. automotive replacement glass (ARG) distribution businesses into a joint venture, PPG Auto Glass, LLC (PPG Auto Glass), of which the Company has a 34 percent interest. The Company’s investment in PPG Auto Glass was $20.1 million and $17.7 million at December 2, 2006 and February 25, 2006, respectively. At December 2, 2006 and February 25, 2006, the excess of the cost of the investment over the value of the underlying net tangible assets when the joint venture was formed was $7.3 million. This excess is reported as goodwill.

In connection with the formation of PPG Auto Glass, the Company agreed to a supply agreement to supply the joint venture, through PPG, with most of the Company’s windshield fabrication capacity at agreed upon terms and conditions. The Company’s windshield supply agreement with PPG expired in July 2005 during the second quarter of fiscal 2006. The Company had been transitioning the Auto Glass segment to focus on selling ARG to wholesalers and distributors, including PPG, following the termination of this supply agreement. This effort ceased in the third quarter of fiscal 2007 as the Company announced its plan to discontinue selling ARG products. The business continues to focus on the original equipment manufacturers and aftermarket recreational vehicle and bus windshield markets.

The Company entered into a short-term loan agreement to provide PPG Auto Glass with a $5.0 million working capital loan during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006. The terms of the note receivable were considered arms’-length, and the note matured on July 26, 2006 and was paid in full during the second quarter of fiscal 2007. The note receivable was included in receivables in the consolidated balance sheets and was $5.0 million at February 25, 2006.

In addition to the above investment, the Company had other equity-method investments totaling $0.3 million at both December 2, 2006 and February 25, 2006.

The carrying amount of goodwill, net of accumulated amortization, attributable to each business segment for the nine months ended December 2, 2006 is detailed below. “Corporate and Other” includes the excess of the cost of the investment over the value of the underlying net tangible assets related to the formation of the PPG Auto Glass joint venture.

10

Table of Contents

The Company’s identifiable intangible assets with finite lives are being amortized over their estimated useful lives and were as follows:

Amortization expense on these identifiable intangible assets was $0.9 million and $1.0 million for the nine months ended December 2, 2006 and November 26, 2005, respectively. At December 2, 2006, the estimated future amortization expense for identifiable intangible assets for the remainder of fiscal 2007 and each of the following four fiscal years was as follows:

During the first quarter of fiscal 2006, the Company initiated a realignment of its window and curtainwall manufacturing operation to better serve the architectural glass products market and incurred severance costs of $0.2 million and $0.6 million during the first and second quarters of fiscal 2006, respectively. These costs were included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated results of operations.

The Company maintains a $100.0 million revolving credit facility. On November 14, 2006 the Company entered into Amendment No. 1 to the Credit Agreement. The amendment extended the expiration date of the agreement from May 2010 to November 2011, effectively decreased the interest rate payable on borrowings and decreased the commitment fee. No other provisions of the agreement were affected by the amendment. The financing costs associated with the credit facility will be amortized over the term of the new credit agreement.

Borrowings of $47.8 million were outstanding as of December 2, 2006. The credit facility requires the Company to maintain a minimum level of net worth as defined in the credit facility based on certain quarterly financial calculations. The minimum required net worth computed in accordance with the credit agreement at December 2, 2006 was $178.5 million, whereas the Company’s net worth as defined in the credit facility was $224.0 million. The credit facility also requires that the Company maintain a debt-to-cash flow ratio of no more than 2.75. This ratio is computed daily, with cash flow computed on a rolling 12-month basis. The Company’s ratio was 0.91 at December 2, 2006. If the Company is not in compliance with either of these covenants, the lender may terminate the commitment and/or declare any loan then outstanding to be immediately due and payable. At December 2, 2006, the Company was in compliance with all of the financial covenants of the credit facility. Long-term debt also includes $8.4 million of industrial development bonds that mature in fiscal years 2021 through 2023.

Interest payments were $2.8 million and $2.1 million for the nine months of fiscal 2007 and 2006, respectively. As interest payments relate to funds borrowed to purchase major buildings, information systems and equipment installations, we capitalize the payments and depreciate them over the lives of the related assets; capitalized interest for the nine months ended December 2, 2006 and November 26, 2005 was $0.5 million and $0.4 million, respectively.

11

Table of Contents

Components of net periodic benefit cost for the Company’s Officers’ Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP) for the three and nine-month periods of fiscal 2007 and 2006 are as follows:

In several transactions in fiscal years 1998 through 2000, the Company completed the sale of its large-scale domestic curtainwall business, the sale of its detention/security business and its exit from international curtainwall operations. The remaining cash expenditures related to these discontinued operations are recorded as liabilities of discontinued operations and a majority of the remaining cash expenditures related to discontinued operations is expected to be paid within the next three years. The majority of these liabilities relate to the international curtainwall operations, including performance bonds outstanding, of which the precise degree of liability related to these matters will not be known until they are settled within the U.K. and French courts. The reserve for discontinued operations also covers other liability issues, consisting of warranty issues relating to these and other international construction projects.

Operating lease commitments. As of December 2, 2006, the Company was obligated under noncancelable operating leases for buildings and equipment. Certain leases provide for increased rentals based upon increases in real estate taxes or operating costs. Future minimum rental payments under noncancelable operating leases are:

Under sale and leaseback transactions, the Company has the option to purchase building and equipment at projected future fair value upon expiration of the leases. During the third quarter of fiscal 2007, the Company notified its lender of its intent to exercise the early buy-out option on one of its equipment leases. The early buy-out is effective March 5, 2007 in the amount of $4.3 million.

Bond commitments. In the ordinary course of business, predominantly in our installation business, we are required to commit to bonds that require payments to our customers for certain non-performance. The outstanding face value of the bonds fluctuates with the value of projects that are in process and in backlog. At December 2, 2006, these bonds totaled $149.7 million. With respect to the current portfolio of businesses, the Company has never been required to pay on these performance-based bonds.

Guarantees and warranties. The Company accrues for known warranty exposures and claim costs as a percentage of sales based on historical trends. Actual warranty and claim costs are deducted from the accrual when incurred. The Company’s warranty and claim accruals are detailed below:

12

Table of Contents

Letters of credit. At December 2, 2006, the Company had ongoing letters of credit related to its construction contracts and certain industrial development bonds. The total value of letters of credit under which the Company was obligated as of December 2, 2006 was approximately $17.3 million. The Company’s total availability under its $100.0 million credit facility is reduced by borrowings under the facility and also by letters of credit issued under the facility. As of December 2, 2006, $10.9 million of letters of credit had been issued under the facility.

Purchase obligations. The Company has obligations for capital expenditures related to the Company’s construction of its new architectural glass fabrication facility in St. George, Utah. The Company also has obligations for raw material commitments and for a long-term freight commitment. As of December 2, 2006, these obligations totaled $26.2 million.

Non-compete agreements. The Company has entered into a number of non-compete and consulting agreements associated with current and former employees. As of December 2, 2006, future payments of $1.7 million were committed under such agreements.

Litigation. The Company is a party to various legal proceedings incidental to its normal operating activities. In particular, like others in the construction supply industry, the Company’s construction supply businesses are routinely involved in various disputes and claims arising out of construction projects, sometimes involving significant monetary damages or product replacement. The Company is subject to litigation arising out of employment practice, workers compensation, general liability and automobile claims. Although it is very difficult to accurately predict the outcome of such proceedings, facts currently available indicate that no such claims will result in losses that would have a material adverse effect on the financial condition of the Company.

The following table presents sales and operating income data for our three segments, and consolidated, for the three and nine months ended December 2, 2006, when compared to the corresponding periods of the prior fiscal year.

Due to the varying combinations of individual window systems and curtainwall, the Company has determined that it is impractical to report product and service revenues generated by the Architectural segment by class of product, beyond the segment revenues currently reported.

13

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward-Looking Statements

This discussion contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements reflect our current views with respect to future events and financial performance. The words “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “estimate,” “forecast,” “project,” “should” and similar expressions are intended to identify “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All forecasts and projections in this document are “forward-looking statements,” and are based on management’s current expectations or beliefs of the Company’s near-term results, based on current information available pertaining to the Company, including the risk factors noted under Item 1A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 25, 2006. From time to time, we may also provide oral and written forward-looking statements in other materials we release to the public such as press releases, presentations to securities analysts or investors, or other communications by the Company. Any or all of our forward-looking statements in this report and in any public statements we make could be materially different from actual results.

Accordingly, we wish to caution investors that any forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of the Company are subject to uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from such statements. These uncertainties and other risk factors include, but are not limited to, the risks and uncertainties set forth under Item 1A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 25, 2006.

The Company wishes to caution investors that other factors might in the future prove to be important in affecting the Company’s results of operations. New factors emerge from time to time; it is not possible for management to predict all such factors, nor can it assess the impact of each such factor on the business or the extent to which any factor, or a combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. The Company undertakes no obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Overview

We are a leader in technologies involving the design and development of value-added glass products, services and systems. The Company is comprised of three segments: Architectural Products and Services (Architectural), Large-Scale Optical (LSO) and Automotive Replacement Glass and Services (Auto Glass). Our Architectural segment companies design, engineer, fabricate, install, maintain and renovate the walls of glass and windows primarily comprising the outside skin of commercial and institutional buildings. Businesses in this segment are: Viracon, a leading fabricator of coated, high-performance architectural glass for global markets; Harmon, Inc., one of the largest U.S. full-service building glass installation, maintenance and renovation companies; Wausau Window and Wall Systems, a manufacturer of custom aluminum window systems and curtainwall; and Linetec, a paint and anodizing finisher of architectural aluminum and PVC shutters. Our LSO segment consists of Tru Vue, a value-added glass and acrylic manufacturer for the custom picture framing market, and a producer of optical thin film coatings for consumer electronics displays. This segment also provides wall décor, including pre-framed art and mirrors. Our Auto Glass segment consists of Viracon/Curvlite, a U.S. fabricator of foreign and domestic aftermarket automotive replacement glass, and original equipment manufacturers’ and aftermarket recreational vehicle and bus windshields; however, during the third quarter of fiscal 2007, the Company announced plans to exit the aftermarket automotive replacement glass product line and to focus on the original equipment manufacturer and aftermarket recreational vehicle and bus windshield markets.

The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 25, 2006 and the consolidated financial statements, including the notes to consolidated financial statements, included therein.

14

Table of Contents

Sales and Earnings

The relationship between various components of operations, stated as a percent of net sales, is illustrated below for the three and nine-month periods of the current and past fiscal year.

Highlights of Third Quarter and First Nine Months of Fiscal 2007, Compared to Third Quarter and First Nine Months of Fiscal 2006

15

Table of Contents

Segment Analysis

The following table presents sales and operating income data for our three segments and on a consolidated basis for the three and nine-month periods ended December 2, 2006, when compared to the corresponding periods a year ago.

NM = Not Meaningful

Due to the varying combinations of individual window systems and curtainwall, the Company has determined that it is impractical to report product and service revenues generated by our Architectural segment by class of product, beyond the segment revenues currently reported.

Architectural Products and Services (Architectural)

Large-Scale Optical Technologies (LSO)

16

Table of Contents

Automotive Replacement Glass and Services (Auto Glass)

Consolidated Backlog

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Operating Activities. Cash provided by operating activities was $11.9 million through the first nine months of fiscal 2007, compared to $17.9 million in the prior-year period. The current period source of cash was driven by net earnings largely offset by higher levels of working capital, primarily increased accounts receivable as a result of the business growth. The prior year’s cash provided by operating activities was impacted by lower working capital requirements due to reduced business activity. Although our non-cash working capital (current assets, excluding cash, less current liabilities) has increased to $94.0 million from $70.6 million at year-end, reducing or at least maintaining current levels of working capital as a percentage of sales is a priority for the Company. Non-cash working capital as a percentage of sales was 12.1 percent at December 2, 2006, up slightly over 10.1 percent at fiscal 2006 year-end.

Investing Activities. Through the first nine months of fiscal 2007, investing activities used cash of 20.1 million, compared to $23.3 million in the same period last year. New capital investment through the first nine months of fiscal 2007 totaled $26.3 million, including spending of $12.4 million for our new architectural glass fabrication plant in St. George, Utah. This compared to $22.5 million for all capital items in the prior-year period. The current-year also includes proceeds from repayment of a $5.0 million loan made to PPG Auto Glass in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006.

In fiscal 2007, we expect to incur capital expenditures for the continuing construction of our new St. George, Utah, architectural glass fabrication plant as well as other architectural segment upgrades and LSO capacity improvements. We also expect to incur costs as necessary to maintain existing facilities, safety and information systems. Fiscal 2007 capital expenditures are expected to be approximately $45 million.

As a normal course of business, we review our portfolio of businesses and their assets in comparison to our internal strategic and performance objectives. As part of this review, we may acquire other businesses, further invest in, fully divest and/or sell parts of our current businesses.

Financing Activities. Total outstanding borrowings increased to $56.2 million at December 2, 2006 from $45.2 million outstanding at February 25, 2006, due to working capital needs and capital expenditures. The majority of our long-term debt, $47.8 million, consisted of bank borrowings under our $100.0 million syndicated revolving credit facility. We have paid $7.4 million in dividends during the current year, compared to $5.3 million in the prior-year nine-month period as a result of making four quarterly payments in the current year, compared to three in the prior-year period solely due to timing of payments. Our debt-to-total-capital ratio was 20.1 percent at December 2, 2006, up from 18.5 percent at February 25, 2006.

17

Table of Contents

During fiscal 2004, the Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program of 1,500,000 shares of common stock in the open market at prevailing market prices. We repurchased 285,324 shares under this program, for a total of $3.2 million through February 26, 2005. In fiscal 2006, we repurchased an additional 250,000 shares for $4.0 million. No share repurchases have been made during fiscal 2007. We have purchased a total of 535,324 shares at a total cost of $7.2 million since the inception of this program. We have remaining authority to repurchase 964,676 shares under this program, although we do not expect to repurchase any shares during the remainder of fiscal 2007.

Other Financing Activities. The following summarizes significant contractual obligations that impact our liquidity:

We maintain a $100.0 million revolving credit facility. On November 14, 2006 we entered into Amendment No. 1 to the Credit Agreement. The amendment extended the expiration date of the agreement from May 2010 to November 2011, effectively decreased the interest rate payable on borrowings and decreased the commitment fee. No other provisions of the agreement were affected by the amendment. The financing costs associated with the credit facility will be amortized over the term of the new credit agreement.

The credit facility requires that we maintain a minimum level of net worth as defined in the credit facility based on certain quarterly financial calculations. The minimum required net worth computed in accordance with the credit agreement at December 2, 2006 was $178.5 million, whereas our net worth as defined in the credit facility was $224.0 million. The credit facility also requires that we maintain a debt-to-cash flow ratio of no more than 2.75. This ratio is computed daily, with cash flow computed on a rolling 12-month basis. Our ratio was 0.91 at December 2, 2006. If we are not in compliance with either of these covenants, the lender may terminate the commitment and/or declare any loan then outstanding to be immediately due and payable. At December 2, 2006, we were in compliance with all of the financial covenants of the credit facility.

From time to time, we acquire the use of certain assets, such as warehouses, automobiles, forklifts, vehicles, office equipment, hardware, software and some manufacturing equipment through operating leases. Many of these operating leases have termination penalties. However, because the assets are used in the conduct of our business operations, it is unlikely that any significant portion of these operating leases would be terminated prior to the normal expiration of their lease terms. Therefore, we consider the risk related to termination penalties to be minimal.

Under our sale and leaseback transactions, we have the option to purchase building and equipment at projected future fair value upon expiration of the leases. During the third quarter of fiscal 2007, we notified our lender of our intent to exercise the early buy-out option on one of our equipment leases. The early buy-out is effective March 5, 2007 in the amount of $4.3 million.

We have obligations for capital expenditures related to the construction of our new architectural glass fabrication facility in St. George, Utah. We also have obligations for raw material commitments and for a long-term freight commitment. As of December 2, 2006, these obligations totaled $26.2 million.

The other obligations in the table above relate to non-compete and consulting agreements with current and former employees.

18

Table of Contents

In addition to the above standby letters of credit, which are predominantly issued for performance-related bonds in our discontinued European curtainwall business, we are required, in the ordinary course of business, to commit to bonds that require payments to our customers for certain non-performance. The outstanding face value of the bonds fluctuates with the value of projects that are in process and in our backlog. At December 2, 2006, these bonds totaled $149.7 million. With respect to our current portfolio of businesses, we have never been required to pay on these performance-based bonds.

We maintain two interest rate swaps that effectively convert $14.4 million of variable rate borrowings into fixed rate obligations. The notional value of the swaps varies between $3.0 million, at expiration on March 29, 2009, and $16.5 million. We receive payments at variable rates while making payments at fixed rates of 5.01 and 4.88 percent.

We experienced a material increase in our premiums and risk retention for our first-party product liability coverages in fiscal 2003, and although we have been able to continue these coverages through fiscal 2007, the premiums and retention have remained high. A material construction project rework event would have a material adverse effect on our operating results.

For fiscal 2007, we believe that current cash on hand, cash generated from operating activities and available capacity under our committed revolving credit facility should be adequate to fund our working capital requirements, planned capital expenditures and dividend payments.

Stock-Based Compensation

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 123 (Revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (SFAS No. 123R), which replaces SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and supercedes APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. SFAS No. 123R requires that all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options and stock-settled stock appreciation rights, be recognized in the financial statements based on their fair values beginning with the first fiscal year beginning after June 15, 2005 (as delayed by the Securities and Exchange Commission).

Effective February 26, 2006, we adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 123R using the modified prospective transition method. As a result of adopting SFAS No. 123R, we recognized $0.7 million and $1.7 million of incremental compensation expense for the three and nine-months ended December 2, 2006, respectively, which is reflected in SG&A expenses in the consolidated results of operations. For additional information on the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, see Note 3, Stock-Based Compensation, of the notes to consolidated financial statements in this Form 10-Q.

Outlook

The following statements are based on current expectations for full-year fiscal 2007 results. These statements are forward-looking, and actual results may differ materially.

19

Table of Contents

Related Party Transactions

No material changes have occurred in the disclosure with respect to our related party transactions set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 25, 2006.

Critical Accounting Policies

No material changes have occurred in the disclosure with respect to our critical accounting policies set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 25, 2006.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

No material changes have occurred in the disclosure of quantitative and qualitative market risk set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 25, 2006.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

The Company has been a party to various legal proceedings incidental to its normal operating activities. In particular, like others in the construction supply industry, the Company’s construction supply businesses are routinely involved in various disputes and claims arising out of construction projects, sometimes involving significant monetary damages or product replacement. The Company has also been subject to litigation arising out of employment practice, workers compensation, general liability and automobile claims. Although it is difficult to accurately predict the outcome of such proceedings, facts currently available indicate that no such claims will result in losses that would have a material adverse effect on the financial condition of the Company.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

There were no material changes in the risk factors discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 25, 2006.

20

Table of Contents

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

The following table provides information with respect to purchases made by the Company of its own stock during the third quarter of fiscal 2007:

Item 6. Exhibits

21

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

22