P/E ratio for Gaia (GAIA)
P/E ratio as of April 2025 (TTM): -16.0
According to Gaia's latest financial reports and stock price the company's current price-to-earnings ratio (TTM) is -15.9925. At the end of 2022 the company had a P/E ratio of -15.9.
P/E ratio history for Gaia from 2001 to 2023
PE ratio at the end of each year
| Year | P/E ratio | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -15.9 | -135.18% |
| 2021 | 45.1 | -86.3% |
| 2020 | 329 | -4263.04% |
| 2019 | -7.91 | 48.9% |
| 2018 | -5.31 | -34.02% |
| 2017 | -8.05 | -659.45% |
| 2016 | 1.44 | -111.07% |
| 2015 | -13.0 | -25.25% |
| 2014 | -17.4 | -110.51% |
| 2013 | 166 | -3032.91% |
| 2012 | -5.64 | 88.1% |
| 2011 | -3.00 | -107.4% |
| 2010 | 40.5 | -89.46% |
| 2009 | 385 | -12334.09% |
| 2008 | -3.14 | -103.71% |
| 2007 | 84.8 | 36.37% |
| 2006 | 62.2 | -63.18% |
| 2005 | 169 | -951.24% |
| 2004 | -19.8 | -79.99% |
| 2003 | -99.2 | -472.95% |
| 2002 | 26.6 | -59.75% |
| 2001 | 66.1 |
P/E ratio for similar companies or competitors
| Company | P/E ratio | P/E ratio differencediff. | Country |
|---|---|---|---|
 | -4.67 | -70.77% | 🇺🇸 USA |
 | N/A | N/A | 🇺🇸 USA |
 | 68.7 | -529.84% | 🇺🇸 USA |
 | 16.2 | -201.44% | 🇺🇸 USA |
 | 13.1 | -182.11% | 🇺🇸 USA |
 | 36.9 | -330.58% | 🇺🇸 USA |
 | 10.5 | -165.70% | 🇺🇸 USA |
 | 15.0 | -193.58% | 🇺🇸 USA |
How to read a P/E ratio?
The Price/Earnings ratio measures the relationship between a company's stock price and its earnings per share. A low but positive P/E ratio stands for a company that is generating high earnings compared to its current valuation and might be undervalued. A company with a high negative (near 0) P/E ratio stands for a company that is generating heavy losses compared to its current valuation.
Companies with a P/E ratio over 30 or a negative one are generaly seen as "growth stocks" meaning that investors typically expect the company to grow or to become profitable in the future.
Companies with a positive P/E ratio bellow 10 are generally seen as "value stocks" meaning that the company is already very profitable and unlikely to strong growth in the future.