Boston Scientific
BSX
#203
Rank
$108.65 B
Marketcap
$73.26
Share price
-1.33%
Change (1 day)
-31.00%
Change (1 year)
Categories

Boston Scientific Corporation is an American medical device manufacturer. The company offers solutions for the following medical specialties: electrophysiology, gastroenterology, vascular surgery, gynecology, interventional cardiology, interventional radiology, female pelvic medicine, neurological surgery, orthopedic surgery, pulmology, pain medicine, structural heart, urology.

Boston Scientific - 10-Q quarterly report FY


Text size:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

-------------------

FORM 10-Q


/x/ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES ACT
OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended: June 30, 1996

Commission file number: 1-11083

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
-----------------------------
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

DELAWARE 04-2695240
-------- ----------
(State or other jurisdiction (I.R.S. Employer
of incorporation or organization) Identification No.)

One Boston Scientific Place, Natick, Massachusetts 01760-1537
- -------------------------------------------------- ----------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (508) 650-8000
-------------

Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last
report.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No ----- -----

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of
common stock, as of the last practicable date.

Shares Outstanding
Class as of June 30, 1996
----- -------------------

Common Stock, $.01 Par Value 177,198,169


Page 1 of 110
---

Exhibit Index on Page 28

Part I
Financial Information

Item 1. Financial Statements

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
June 30, December 31,
In thousands, except share data 1996 1995
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

<S> <C> <C>
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 52,698 $ 117,321
Marketable securities 25,432 43,832
Trade accounts receivable, net 266,284 214,232
Inventories 190,331 148,572
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 48,581 32,688
-----------------------
Total current assets 583,326 556,645

Property, plant, equipment and leaseholds, net 287,195 256,093
Intangibles, net 295,652 137,704
Other investments and assets 91,562 149,446
-----------------------
$1,257,735 $1,099,888
=======================
</TABLE>

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.



BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (continued)
(Unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
June 30, December 31,
In thousands, except share data 1996 1995
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

<S> <C> <C>
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Current liabilities:
Commercial paper $ 235,000
Bank obligations 25,724 $ 57,520
Accounts payable and accrued expenses 116,947 106,322
Accrual related to special charges 71,064 80,144
Other current liabilities 16,601 29,691
-----------------------
Total current liabilities 465,336 273,677

Long term liabilities 16,978 52,061

Commitments and contingencies

Contingent stock repurchase obligation 24,855
Stockholders' equity:
Preferred stock, $ .01 par value - authorized
25,000,000 shares, none issued and outstanding
Common stock, $ .01 par value - authorized
300,000,000 shares, 179,101,866 shares issued at
June 30, 1996 and 179,079,298 at December 31, 1995 1,791 1,791
Additional paid-in capital 377,795 386,610
Retained earnings 440,470 417,951
Foreign currency translation adjustment (23,297) (14,739)
Unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities, net 11,935 8,833
Treasury stock, at cost - 1,903,697 shares at
June 30, 1996 and 2,425,490 shares at
December 31, 1995 (58,128) (26,296)
-----------------------
Total stockholders' equity 750,566 774,150
-----------------------
$1,257,735 $1,099,888
=======================
</TABLE>

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.



BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Three months ended Six months ended
June 30, June 30,
In thousands, except share and per share data 1996 1995 1996 1995
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net sales $357,188 $277,952 $679,571 $540,861
Cost of products sold 94,884 82,077 180,518 160,859
------------------------- -------------------------
Gross profit 262,304 195,875 499,053 380,002

Selling, general and administrative expenses 118,495 91,638 222,535 172,537
Research and development expenses 28,693 22,683 54,446 44,197
Royalties 3,828 7,002 7,710 14,748
Special charges 59,666 128,341 124,749
------------------------- -------------------------
210,682 121,323 413,032 356,231
------------------------- -------------------------
Operating income 51,622 74,552 86,021 23,771

Other income (expense):
Interest and dividend income 1,071 3,121 2,840 7,640
Interest expense (3,202) (2,660) (4,492) (5,381)
Other, net (1,670) 2,716 (3,690) 6,314
------------------------- -------------------------
Income before income taxes 47,821 77,729 80,679 32,344
Income taxes 24,311 28,700 58,160 47,377
------------------------- -------------------------
Net income (loss) $23,510 $49,029 $22,519 ($15,033)
========================= =========================

Primary net income (loss) per common share $0.13 $0.27 $0.13 ($0.09)
========================= =========================
Primary weighted average number of common shares 182,662,000 179,160,000 179,857,000 174,669,000
========================= =========================

Fully diluted net income (loss) per common share $0.13 $0.27 $0.12 ($0.09)
========================= =========================
Fully diluted weighted average number of common shares 182,871,000 179,543,000 182,397,000 174,669,000
========================= =========================
</TABLE>

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.



BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholder's Equity
(Unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Six Months Ended June 30, 1996
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Foreign
Common Stock Additional Currency
------------------------ Paid in Retained Translation Unrealized Treasury
Shares Issued Par Value Capital Earnings Adjustment Gain Stock Total
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(In thousands, except share data)

<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance at December 31, 1995 179,079,298 $1,791 $386,610 $417,951 $(14,739) $ 8,833 $(26,296) $774,150

Net income 22,519 22,519

Foreign currency translation
adjustment (8,558) (8,558)

Issuance of Common Stock under
options, warrants and stock purchase
plans 22,568 (635) 17,958 17,323

Purchase of Common Stock for treasury (52,313) (52,313)

Contingent stock repurchase obligation (24,855) 2,523 (22,332)

Tax benefit relating to stock option
and employee stock purchase plans 16,379 16,379

Net change in equity investments 3,102 3,102

Other 296 296

Balance at June 30, 1996 179,101,866 $1,791 $377,795 $440,470 $(23,297) $11,935 $(58,128) $750,566
</TABLE>

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.



BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow
(Unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Six Months Ended
June 30,
In thousands 1996 1995
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

<S> <C> <C>
Cash provided by operating activities $ 20,104 $ 32,381

Investing activities:
Purchases of property, plant, and equipment (44,872) (37,437)
Net maturities of marketable securities 18,400 22,857
Payment for purchase of Symbiosis Corporation,
net of cash acquired (153,907)
Payment for purchase of Cardiovascular Imaging
Systems, Inc., net of cash acquired (87,783)
Payment for purchase of MinTec Inc.,
net of cash acquired (71,160)
Payment for acquisition of minority interest ownership
in a subsidiary (16,513)
Net payments for other acquistions of certain technologies (3,229) (9,830)
Investments and other (3,720) (1,065)
--------------------
Cash used in investing activities (275,001) (113,258)

Financing actvities:
Net increase in commercial paper 235,000
Net payments on notes payable and capital leases (28,224) (19,393)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options, warrants
and stock purchase plans 17,323 21,480
Acquisitions of treasury stock, net of proceeds from
put options (49,790)
Tax benefit relating to stock option and employee
stock purchase plans 16,379 9,209
Other 704 1,167
--------------------
Cash provided by financing activities 191,392 12,463
Effect of foreign exchange rates on cash (1,118) (873)
--------------------
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents (64,623) (69,287)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 117,321 269,282
--------------------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 52,698 $199,995
====================

Supplemental Schedule of Noncash Investing
and Financing Activities:
Payments due in connection with purchase of technology $ 10,000
</TABLE>

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.



Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
June 30, 1996

Note A - Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have
been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for
interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and
Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the
information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles
for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all
adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring accruals) considered
necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for
the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 1996 are not necessarily
indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December
31, 1996. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial
statements and footnotes thereto incorporated by reference in the Boston
Scientific Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1995.

Certain prior year's amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current
year presentation.

Note B - Acquisitions

On January 22, 1996, Boston Scientific Corporation (the Company) completed its
merger of EP Technologies, Inc. (EPT) in a stock-for-stock transaction. The
transaction, which was accounted for as a pooling-of-interests, was effected
through the exchange of 0.297 shares of the Company's common stock for each
EPT share held. Approximately 3.4 million shares of the Company's common
stock were issued in conjunction with the EPT merger. The accompanying
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been restated to
include the accounts and operations of EPT for all prior periods.

Separate results of the combining entities for the six months ended June 30,
1995 are as follows (in thousands):

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Combined
Boston Boston
Scientific EPT Scientific
----------------------------------

<S> <C> <C> <C>
Net sales $529,729 $11,132 $540,861
Net loss $(14,048) $ (985) $(15,033)
</TABLE>

Note B - Acquisitions (continued)

On March 14, 1996, the Company acquired Symbiosis Corporation (Symbiosis),
formerly a wholly-owned subsidiary of American Home Products Corporation.
Boston Scientific purchased Symbiosis, a developer and manufacturer of
specialty medical devices, for approximately $153 million in a cash
transaction. The acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of
accounting. Accordingly, the purchase price was allocated to the assets
acquired based on their estimated fair values. This accounting treatment
resulted in approximately $146 million of intangible assets that will be
amortized over their estimated period of benefit. Approximately $38.7 million
of the acquisition cost represented purchased research and development. The
Company also recorded a deferred tax liability of approximately $38.7 million
representing the tax effect of timing differences recorded as part of the
acquisition.

The following unaudited pro forma information presents a summary of
consolidated results of operations of the Company and Symbiosis as if the
acquisition had occurred at the beginning of 1995, with pro forma adjustments
to give effect to purchased research and development, amortization of
intangibles, reduction in interest income on acquisition financing and certain
other adjustments, together with the related tax effects:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
For the Six Months
Ended June 30,
1996 1995
---------------

<S> <C> <C>
Net sales $683,747 $573,828
Net income (loss) $ 60,826 $(53,218)
Primary net income (loss) per common share $ .34 $ (.30)
Fully diluted net income (loss) per common share $ .33 $ (.30)
</TABLE>

On May 3, 1996, Boston Scientific acquired assets from Endotech, Ltd. and
MinTec Inc., and certain related companies (Endotech/MinTec), a privately held
company dedicated to the development of stent graft technology for the repair
of diseased blood vessels. The Company purchased Endotech/MinTec's assets for
approximately $72 million in a cash transaction. The transaction, which was
accounted for under the purchase method of accounting, was financed from the
Company's available cash and borrowings under its financing arrangements (see
Notes C and D). The purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired based
on their estimated fair values. The treatment resulted in approximately $12
million of intangible assets that will be amortized over their estimated
period of benefit. Approximately $57.3 million of the acquisition cost
represented purchased research and development. The acquisition did not have
a material pro forma impact on the Company's operations.

Note C - Merger-Related Charges

In the first six months of 1996, the Company recorded special charges of
$128.3 million ($113.7 million net-of tax) which primarily related to the
merger with EPT and the acquisitions of Symbiosis and Endotech/MinTec.
Charges include $96.0 million for purchased research and development, $4.6
million in direct transaction costs, and $12.2 million of estimated costs to
be incurred in merging the separate operating businesses of EPT with
subsidiaries of the Company. Estimated costs include those typical in a
merging of operations and relate to, among other things, rationalization of
facilities, workforce reductions, unwinding of various contractual
commitments, asset writedowns and other integration costs. The majority of
the remaining $15.5 million, which is primarily non-deductible for tax
purposes, represents a change in management's estimates of the merger-related
charges recorded in 1995. The change to prior year estimates relate primarily
to the costs of unwinding various contractual obligations and the
rationalization of facilities.

The special charges are determined based on formal plans approved by Company's
management using the best information available to it at the time. The
workforce-related initiatives involve substantially all of the Company's
employee groups. The amounts the Company may ultimately incur may change as
the plans are executed.

Note D - Credit Arrangements

At December 31, 1995, the Company had line of credit agreements with two U.S.
banks (the Credit Agreements) that provided maximum worldwide borrowings of
$71 million. On April 1, the Company increased its maximum worldwide
borrowings provided under the Credit Agreements to $121 million. The term of
the increased borrowings extended through June 7, 1996, at which time, the
Credit Agreements were terminated and replaced by a new $350 million revolving
line of credit with a syndicate of U.S. and international banks (New Credit
Agreement). Under the New Credit Agreement, the Company has the option to
borrow amounts at various interest rates, payable quarterly in arrears. The
term of the borrowings extends through June 6, 2002; use of the borrowings is
unrestricted and the borrowings are unsecured. The New Credit Agreement
requires the Company to maintain a minimum consolidated tangible net worth and
a ratio of consolidated funded debt to consolidated tangible net worth. At
June 30, 1996, the Company had no outstanding borrowings under the New Credit
Agreement.

During the second quarter of 1996, the Company initiated a commercial paper
program and borrowed $236.5 million under the program. The commercial paper
is supported by the Company's New Credit Agreement; outstanding commercial
paper reduces available borrowings under the New Credit Agreement. Proceeds
from issuing the commercial paper were used for repayment of a $100 million
short term seller-financed loan associated with the acquisition of Symbiosis,
repayment of borrowings under the Credit Agreements, and repurchase of the
Company's common stock. The remaining proceeds primarily were used for
general operating purposes. At June 30, 1996, the Company had approximately
$235 million in commercial paper outstanding with interest rates ranging from
5.60% to 5.65%.

Note E - Inventories

The components of inventory consist of the following (in thousands):

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
June 30, December 31,
1996 1995
-----------------------

<S> <C> <C>
Finished goods $103,607 $ 76,531
Work-in-process 39,138 35,179
Raw materials 47,586 36,862
-------------------
$190,331 $148,572
===================
</TABLE>

Note F - Stockholders' Equity

During the second quarter of 1996, the Company resumed its program to
repurchase stock. The Board of Directors authorized the Company to purchase
on the open market up to 15,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock in
addition to the stock repurchased during 1993. Purchases will be made at
prevailing prices as market conditions and cash availability warrant.
Repurchased stock will be used to satisfy the Company's obligations pursuant
to its employee benefit and incentive plans. During the second quarter of
1996, the Company repurchased 1,262,500 shares of its common stock at an
aggregate cost of $52.3 million.

As part of the stock repurchase program, during the second quarter of 1996,
the Company sold European equity put options to an independent broker-dealer.
Each option, if exercised, obligates the Company to purchase from the broker-
dealer a specified number of shares of the Company's common stock at a
predetermined exercise price. The put options are exercisable only on the
first anniversary of the date the options were sold. During the second
quarter of 1996, the Company sold European put options for 600,000 shares and
received proceeds of approximately $2.5 million. Proceeds are recorded as a
reduction to the cost of the Company's treasury stock. Repurchase prices
relating to put options outstanding at June 30, 1996 range from $41.10 per
share to $41.75 per share. The Company's contingent obligation to repurchase
shares upon exercise of the outstanding put options approximated $24.9 million
at June 30, 1996. At June 30, 1996, the aggregate contingent repurchase
obligation has been reclassified from permanent equity and is presented as a
contingent stock repurchase obligation.

Note G - Accounting Pronouncement

As of January 1, 1996, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and
Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of", which establishes criteria for the
recognition and measurement of impairment loss associated with long-lived
assets. Adoption of this standard had no material impact on the Company's
financial position or results of operations.

Note H - Commitments and Contingencies

Schneider (Europe) AG and Schneider (USA) Inc. (the Schneider companies),
subsidiaries of Pfizer, Inc., have alleged that the Company's Synergy(TM)
products infringe one of their patents. On May 13, 1994, the Company filed a
lawsuit against them in the United States Federal District Court for the
District of Massachusetts seeking a declaratory judgment that this patent is
invalid and that the Company's Synergy products do not infringe the patent.
The Schneider companies filed counterclaims against the Company, alleging the
Company's willful infringement of the patent and seeking monetary and
injunctive relief. The parties have made cross motions for summary judgment
on various aspects of the case.

On May 31, 1994, SCIMED Life Systems, Inc. (SCIMED) filed a suit for patent
infringement against Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. (ACS), alleging
willful infringement of two of SCIMED's U.S. patents by ACS FLOWTRACK-40(TM)
and RX ELIPSE(TM) PTCA catheters. Suit was filed in the U.S. District Court
for the Northern District of California and seeks monetary and injunctive
relief. The case has been sent to arbitration for a threshold determination
of one issue covered by the November 27, 1991 Settlement Agreement (the
Settlement Agreement) between the parties. That arbitration is scheduled for
hearing in October 1996.

On November 17, 1995, SCIMED filed a suit for patent infringement against ACS,
alleging willful infringement of three of SCIMED's U.S. patents by the ACS RX
LIFESTREAM(TM) PTCA catheter. Suit was filed in the U.S. District Court for
the Northern District of California and seeks monetary and injunctive relief.
The case has also been sent to arbitration under the terms of the Settlement
Agreement, and has been consolidated with the arbitration hearing scheduled
to be held in October 1996.

On October 10, 1995, ACS filed a suit for patent infringement against SCIMED,
alleging willful infringement of four U.S. patents by SCIMED'S EXPRESS
PLUS(TM) and EXPRESS PLUS II(TM) PTCA catheters. Suit was filed in the U.S.
District Court for the Northern District of California and seeks monetary and
injunctive relief. SCIMED has answered, denying the allegations of the
complaint.

On December 15, 1995, the Company and SCIMED filed a suit for restraint of
trade, unfair competition and conspiracy to monopolize against ACS and the
Schneider companies, alleging certain violations of state and federal
antitrust laws arising from the improper prosecution, enforcement and cross-
licensing of U.S. patents relating to rapid exchange balloon dilatation
angioplasty catheters. Suit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the
District of Massachusetts and seeks monetary, declaratory and injunctive
relief. The defendants have moved for dismissal.

On March 12, 1996, ACS filed two suits for patent infringement against SCIMED,
alleging in one case the willful infringement of a U.S. patent by SCIMED's
EXPRESS PLUS, EXPRESS PLUS II and LEAP EXPRESS PLUS PTCA catheters, and in the
other case the willful infringement of a U.S. patent by SCIMED's BANDIT(TM)
PTCA catheter. The suits were filed in the U.S. District Court for the
Northern District of California and seek monetary and injunctive relief.
SCIMED has answered, denying the allegations of both complaints.

On November 9, 1994, Target Therapeutics, Inc. (Target) filed a lawsuit in the
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California alleging that
SCIMED's VENTURE and VENTURE II microcatheters infringe a patent assigned to
Target. On May 2, 1996, the District Court entered an order granting a
preliminary injunction prohibiting SCIMED from marketing or selling the
accused product. On July 1, 1996, the Court of Appeals for the Federal
Circuit stayed the preliminary injunction pending a decision on SCIMED's
appeal of the District Court's order.

On April 5, 1995, C.R. Bard, Inc. (Bard) filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District
Court for the District of Delaware alleging that certain Company products,
including the Company's Max Force TTS(TM) catheter, infringes a patent
assigned to Bard. The lawsuit seeks a declaratory judgment that the Company
has infringed the Bard patent, as well as a monetary and injunctive relief.
The Company has answered, denying the allegations of the complaint.

On March 7, 1996, Cook Inc. filed suit in the Regional Court, Munich, Division
for Patent Disputes in Munich Germany against MinTec, Inc. Minimally Invasive
Technologies as named defendant alleging that the Cragg EndoPro(TM) System I
and Stentor(TM) endovascular devices infringe a certain Cook patent. Since
the purchase of the assets of the Endotech/MinTec companies by the Company,
the Company has assumed control of the litigation. The defendant's answer has
not been filed.

On March 25, 1996, Cordis Corporation, a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson
Company, filed a suit for patent infringement against SCIMED, alleging the
infringement of five U.S. patents by SCIMED's LEAP(TM) balloon material, used
in certain models of SCIMED's BANDIT and EXPRESS PLUS products. The suit was
filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota and seeks
monetary and injunctive relief. SCIMED has answered, denying the allegations
of the complaint.

On September 1, 1995, a purported class action lawsuit was filed in the Court
of Chancery in the State of Delaware in and for New Castle County, captioned
Kinder v. Auth, et al., alleging breaches of fiduciary duty by the Board of
Directors of Heart Technology, Heart Technology and the Company in connection
with the Agreement and Plan of Merger entered into between the Company and
Heart Technology. In January 1996, the parties agreed to settle the suit for
an amount the Company does not deem to be material.

On June 12, 1995, the Trustee in Bankruptcy for SMEC, Inc. filed a complaint
in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Nashville, Tennessee alleging that a
transaction between Datascope Corp. and the Company constitutes a fraudulent
settlement of prior litigation among the Trustee, Datascope Corp., IABP Corp.
and the Company. The complaint further alleges violation of the Racketeer
Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act. The Company has answered, denying
the allegations of the complaint.

The Company is involved in various other lawsuits from time to time. In
management's opinion, the Company is not currently involved in any legal
proceedings other than those specifically identified above which, individually
or in the aggregate, could have a material effect on the financial condition,
operations or cash flows of the Company. The Company has insurance coverage
which management believes is adequate to protect against such product
liability losses as could otherwise materially affect the Company's financial
position.

The Company believes that it has meritorious defenses against claims that it
has infringed patents of others. However, there can be no assurance that the
Company will prevail in any particular case. An adverse outcome in one or
more cases in which the Company's products are accused of patent infringement
could have a material adverse effect on the Company.

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations

Results of Operations

Net sales in the second quarter of 1996 increased 28.5% to $357.2 million as
compared to $278.0 million in the second quarter of 1995. The Company
reported net income for the second quarter of 1996 of $23.5 million including
special charges ($47.2 million net-of-tax) primarily related to its recent
acquisition of Endotech/MinTec. Net income for the second quarter, excluding
special charges related to recent acquisitions, increased 44.3% to $70.7
million from $49.0 million in the second quarter of 1995.

Net sales for the six month period ended June 30, 1996 increased 25.6% to
$679.6 as compared to $540.9 million in the first half of 1995. The Company
reported net income for the six month period ended June 30, 1996 of $22.5
million including special charges ($128.3 million or $113.7 million net-of-tax)
related to recent acquisitions compared to a net loss of $15.0 million
including special charges ($124.7 million or $112.1 million net-of-tax) for
the same period in 1995. Net income for the first half of 1996, excluding
special charges related to recent acquisitions, increased 40.3% to $136.2
million from $97.1 million in the first half of 1995.

Revenues in the United States grew approximately 18.7% during the second
quarter compared to the same period of the prior year. International
revenues, including export sales, increased approximately 48.4% during the
second quarter compared to the same period in the prior year and were
negatively impacted by approximately $8.4 million due to changes in foreign
currency exchange rates. Revenues in the United States grew approximately
16.6% during the first six months of 1996 compared to the same period of the
prior year. International revenues, including export sales, increased
approximately 44.0% during the first six months of 1996 compared to the same
period in the prior year and were negatively impacted by approximately $10.1
million due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. The increase in
international sales reflects results from the Company's strategy to build its
international organization.

Gross profit as a percentage of net sales improved from 70.5% in the three
months ended June 30, 1995 to 73.4% in the three months ended June 30, 1996,
and improved from 70.3% in the six months ended June 30, 1995 to 73.4% in the
six months ended June 30, 1996. The improvement in the Company's gross
margins is primarily due to the Company's U.S. cost containment programs, an
increase in the percentage of international sales compared to U.S. sales, and
certain benefits of converting from selling through international distributors
to direct sales operations. However, the positive impact of these initiatives
was partially offset by a slight decline in average selling prices due to
continuing efforts to contain healthcare costs and increased competition.
Uncertainty remains with regard to future changes within the health care
industry. Continued consolidation among U.S. health care providers and the
trend towards managed care in the United States may result in continued
pressure on selling prices of certain products and resulting compression on
gross margins. In addition, international markets are also being effected by
economic pressure to contain health care costs. Although these factors will
continue to impact the rate at which Boston Scientific can grow, the Company
believes that it is well positioned to take advantage of opportunities for
growth that exist in the markets it serves.

Selling, general and administrative expenses increased 29.3% from $91.6
million in the three months ended June 30, 1995 to $118.5 million in the three
months ended June 30, 1996. Selling, general and administrative expenses
increased 29.0% from $172.5 million to $222.5 million from the first six
months of 1995 to 1996, respectively. The increase in overall expense dollars
reflects continued expansion of the Company's domestic and international sales
organizations and related marketing support, an increase in legal expenses
incurred to strengthen and defend the Company's patent position, and
amortization of intangibles acquired during 1995 and 1996.

Research and development expenses increased 26.5% from $22.7 million in the
second quarter of 1995 to $28.7 million in the second quarter of 1996, and
23.2% from $44.2 million in the first six months of 1995 to $54.4 million in
the first six months of 1996. Research and development expenses remained
relatively constant as a percentage of sales (8.2% in the second quarter of
1995 and 8.0% in the second quarter of 1996). The increase in dollars
reflects increased spending in regulatory, clinical research and various other
product development programs, and reflects the Company's continued commitment
to refine existing products and procedures and to develop new technologies
that provide simpler, less traumatic, less costly and more efficient diagnosis
and treatment. The trend toward more stringent regulatory oversight in
countries around the world for product clearance and enforcement activities
has generally caused or may cause medical device manufacturers to experience
more uncertainty, greater risk and higher expenses. In addition, regulatory
approval times for new products continues to be lengthy, a concern of medical
device manufacturers generally.

Royalty expenses decreased 45.3% from $7.0 million in the second quarter of
1995 to $3.8 million in the second quarter of 1996, and 47.7% from $14.7
million in the first six months of 1995 to $7.7 million in the first six
months of 1996. Royalty expenses decreased from approximately 2.5% of net
sales in the second quarter of 1995 to 1.1% of net sales in the second quarter
of 1996. The decrease in royalties is primarily attributable to a reduction
in sales of certain of the Company's PTCA products that are subject to
royalties.

In the first six months of 1996, the Company recorded special charges of
$128.3 million ($113.7 million net-of tax) which primarily related to the
merger with EPT and the acquisitions of Symbiosis and Endotech/MinTec.
Charges include $96.0 million for purchased research and development, $4.6
million in direct transaction costs, and $12.2 million of estimated costs to
be incurred in merging the EPT business with subsidiaries of the Company.
Estimated costs include those typical in a merging of operations and relate
to, among other things, rationalization of facilities, workforce reductions,
unwinding of various contractual commitments, asset writedowns and other
integration costs. The majority of the remaining $15.5 million, which is
primarily non-deductible for tax purposes, represents a change in management's
estimates of the merger-related charges recorded in 1995. The change to prior
year estimates relate primarily to the costs of unwinding various contractual
obligations and the rationalization of facilities. In the first half of 1995,
the Company recorded special charges of $124.7 million ($112.1 million, net-
of-tax) in connection with the acquisitions of SCIMED, CVIS and Vesica.
Charges included $32.6 million for purchased research and development, $21.1
million in direct transaction costs, and $71.0 million of estimated costs to
be incurred in merging the SCIMED business with subsidiaries of the Company.
Estimated costs included those typical in a merging of operations and relate
to, among other things, rationalization of facilities, workforce reductions,
unwinding of various contractual commitments, asset writedowns and other
integration costs. The special charges are determined based on formal plans
approved by Company's management using the best information available to it at
the time. The amounts the Company may ultimately incur may change as the
plans are executed.

Interest and dividend income was $1.1 million in the second quarter of 1996
compared to $3.1 million in the second quarter of 1995, and $2.8 million in
the first six months of 1996 compared to $7.6 million in the first six months
of 1995. The decrease is primarily attributable to a decrease in the
Company's average cash and marketable securities balance resulting from the
use of cash to finance several of the Company's strategic acquisitions and
alliances during the second half of 1995 and the first half of 1996. Interest
expense increased from $2.7 million in the second quarter of 1995 to $3.2
million in the second quarter of 1996. The increase in interest expense is
primarily attributable to interest on a $100 million short term seller-
financed loan associated with the acquisition of Symbiosis and the Company's
issuance of commercial paper. Interest expense decreased from $5.4 million in
the first six months of 1995 to $4.5 million in the first six months of 1996.
The decrease in interest expense for the six month period is primarily
attributable to decreased foreign borrowings since the first quarter of 1995
partially offset by interest on the $100 million short term seller-financed
loan and the Company's issuance of commercial paper. Other income (expense),
net, decreased from $2.7 million in the second quarter of 1995 to ($1.7
million) in the second quarter of 1996, and from $6.3 million in the first six
months of 1995 to ($3.7 million) in the first six months of 1996. The
decrease is primarily attributable to approximately $3.1 million of net
foreign exchange transaction gains recorded in the second quarter of 1995, as
compared to approximately $0.8 million of net foreign exchange transaction
losses recorded in the second quarter of 1996, and approximately $6.3 million
of net foreign exchange transaction gains recorded in the first six months of
1995 as compared to approximately $2.2 million of net foreign exchange
transaction losses in the first six months of 1996.

The Company's effective tax rate, excluding the impact on special charges,
improved from approximately 36.9% in the second quarter of 1995 to 34.2% in
the second quarter of 1996. The Company's effective tax rate, excluding the
impact on special charges, was approximately 38.2% in the six months of 1995
as compared to 34.8% in the first six months of 1996. The effective tax rate
including special charges was 50.8% in the second quarter of 1996 compared to
36.9% in the second quarter of 1995, and 72.1% in the first six months of 1996
compared to 146.5% in the first six months of 1995. The reduction in the
Company's effective tax rate, excluding the impact of special charges, is
primarily due to increased business in lower tax geographies and other tax
initiatives.

On January 22, 1996, the Company completed its merger of EP Technologies, Inc.
(EPT) in a stock-for-stock transaction. The transaction, which was accounted
for as a pooling-of-interests, was effected through the exchange of 0.297
shares of the Company's common stock for each EPT share held. Approximately
3.4 million shares of the Company's common stock were issued in conjunction
with the EPT merger.

On March 14, 1996, the Company acquired Symbiosis Corporation (Symbiosis),
formerly a wholly-owned subsidiary of American Home Products Corporation.
Boston Scientific purchased Symbiosis, a developer and manufacturer of
specialty medical devices, for approximately $153 million in a cash
transaction. The acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of
accounting. Accordingly, the purchase price was allocated to the assets
acquired based on their estimated fair values. This accounting treatment
resulted in approximately $146 million of intangible assets that will be
amortized over their estimated period of benefit. Approximately $38.7 million
of the acquisition cost represented purchased research and development. The
Company also recorded a deferred tax liability of approximately $38.7 million
representing the tax effect of timing differences recorded as part of the
acquisition.

On May 3, 1996, Boston Scientific acquired assets from Endotech, Ltd. and
MinTec Inc. and certain related companies (Endotech/MinTec), a privately held
company dedicated to the development of stent graft technology for the repair
of diseased blood vessels. The Company purchased assets from Endotech/MinTec
for approximately $72 million in a cash transaction. The transaction, which
was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting, was financed from
the Company's available cash and borrowings under its financing arrangements.
The purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired based on their
estimated fair values. The treatment resulted in approximately $12 million of
intangible assets which will be amortized over their estimated period of
benefit. Approximately $57.3 million of the acquisition cost represented
purchased research and development.

The Company has substantially completed the integration of the businesses
acquired early in 1995, and is in the process of integrating the businesses
acquired more recently. Management believes it has developed a sound plan for
continuing and concluding the integration process, and that it will achieve
that plan. However, in view of the number of major transactions undertaken by
the Company, and the dramatic changes in the size of the Company and the
complexity of its organization resulting from these transactions, management
also believes that the successful implementation of its plan presents a
significant degree of difficulty. The failure to integrate these businesses
effectively could adversely affect the Company's ability to realize the
strategic and financial objectives of these transactions.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash and marketable securities totaled $78.1 million at June 30, 1996 compared
to $161.2 million at December 31, 1995. Working capital decreased from $283.0
million at December 31, 1995 to $118.0 million at June 30, 1996. The decrease
in cash and marketable securities is primarily attributable to approximately
$225.1 million paid in conjunction with the Company's acquisitions of
Symbiosis and Endotech/MinTec, capital expenditures incurred primarily to
expand the Company's manufacturing and distribution facilities in Europe, cash
used to repurchase the Company's common stock, payment of merger related costs
and net payments on line of credit borrowings. The cash expenditures were
partially offset by proceeds received in connection with the Company's
initiation of a commercial paper program. The increase in accounts receivable
from December 31, 1995 to June 30, 1996 is primarily due to the dramatic
growth of international sales which typically have longer payment periods, the
shift from international distributors to direct sales forces and the accounts
receivable recorded in connection with the acquisitions of Symbiosis and
Endotech/MinTec. The increase in inventory during the same period is
primarily related to the Company's overall increase in sales and the shift
from international distributors to direct sales forces.

In connection with the acquisitions of SCIMED, CVIS, Meadox, Heart, EPT,
Symbiosis, and Endotech/MinTec, the Company recorded non-recurring and special
charges of approximately $237.1 million ($195.3 million net-of-tax) and $128.3
million ($113.7 million net-of tax) during 1995 and the first half of 1996,
respectively. Integration plans are expected to be substantially completed by
the end of 1997. Cash outflows to complete the balance of the Company's
initiatives to integrate the businesses relating to the business combinations
acquired are estimated to be approximately $45.1 million and $19.2 million for
the remaining of 1996 and thereafter, respectively. Additionally, the Company
expects to continue to invest aggressively in building its international
organization, global systems and worldwide manufacturing and distribution
capacity. The Company's international strategy is subject to the economic and
political risks inherent to international business, including fluctuations in
currency and exchange rates, as well as risks inherent in shifting from
international distributors to a direct sales force.

The Company is involved in various lawsuits, including product liability
suits, from time to time in the normal course of business. In management's
opinion, the Company is not currently involved in any legal proceeding other
than those specifically identified in the notes to the unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements which, individually or in the aggregate,
could have a material effect on the financial condition, operations and cash
flows of the Company. The Company has insurance coverage which management
believes is adequate to protect against such product liability losses as could
otherwise materially affect the Company's financial position.

Over the past eighteen months, the Company has entered into several
transactions involving acquisitions and alliances, certain of which have
involved equity investments. As the health care environment continues to
undergo rapid change, management expects that it will continue focusing on
strategic initiatives. The Company expects its cash and cash equivalents,
marketable securities, cash flows from operating activities, and borrowing
capacity will be sufficient to meet its projected operating cash needs,
including integration costs at least through the end of 1996.

Cautionary Statement for Purposes of the Safe Harbor Provisions of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995

This report contains forward-looking statements. The Company desires to take
advantage of the new safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and is including this statement for the express
purpose of availing itself of the protections of the safe harbor with respect
to all forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements contained in
this report include, but are not limited to, statements with respect to: a)
the Company's strategy to build its international organization; b) the
Company's plans to continue to invest aggressively in its global systems and
worldwide manufacturing and distribution capacity; c)the Company's belief that
it is well positioned to take advantage of opportunities for growth that exist
in the markets it serves; d) the Company's continued commitment to refine
existing products and procedures and to develop new technologies that provide
simpler, less traumatic, less costly and more efficient diagnosis and
treatment; e) the process and plan for the integration of businesses acquired
by the Company, and; f) the ability of the Company to meet its projected cash
needs through the end of 1996. Therefore, the Company wishes to caution each
reader of this report to consider carefully the specific factors discussed
with each forward-looking statement in this report and other factors contained
in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
1995 as such factors in some cases have affected, and in the future (together
with other factors) could affect, the ability of the Company to implement its
business strategy and may cause actual results to differ materially from those
contemplated by the statements expressed herein.

Part II

OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1: Legal Proceedings

Schneider (Europe) AG and Schneider (USA) Inc. (the Schneider companies),
subsidiaries of Pfizer, Inc., have alleged that the Company's Synergy(TM)
products infringe one of their patents. On May 13, 1994, the Company filed a
lawsuit against them in the United States Federal District Court for the
District of Massachusetts seeking a declaratory judgment that this patent is
invalid and that the Company's Synergy products do not infringe the patent.
The Schneider companies filed counterclaims against the Company, alleging the
Company's willful infringement of the patent and seeking monetary and
injunctive relief. The parties have made cross motions for summary judgment
on various aspects of the case.

On May 31, 1994, SCIMED Life Systems, Inc. (SCIMED) filed a suit for patent
infringement against Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. (ACS), alleging
willful infringement of two of SCIMED's U.S. patents by ACS FLOWTRACK-40(TM)
and RX ELIPSE(TM) PTCA catheters. Suit was filed in the U.S. District Court
for the Northern District of California and seeks monetary and injunctive
relief. The case has been sent to arbitration for a threshold determination
of one issue covered by the November 27, 1991 Settlement Agreement (the
Settlement Agreement) between the parties. That arbitration is scheduled for
hearing in October 1996.

On November 17, 1995, SCIMED filed a suit for patent infringement against ACS,
alleging willful infringement of three of SCIMED's U.S. patents by the ACS RX
LIFESTREAM(TM) PTCA catheter. Suit was filed in the U.S. District Court for
the Northern District of California and seeks monetary and injunctive relief.
The case has also been sent to arbitration under the terms of the Settlement
Agreement, and has been consolidated with the arbitration hearing scheduled
to be held in October 1996.

On October 10, 1995, ACS filed a suit for patent infringement against SCIMED,
alleging willful infringement of four U.S. patents by SCIMED'S EXPRESS
PLUS(TM) and EXPRESS PLUS II(TM) PTCA catheters. Suit was filed in the U.S.
District Court for the Northern District of California and seeks monetary and
injunctive relief. SCIMED has answered, denying the allegations of the
complaint.

On December 15, 1995, the Company and SCIMED filed a suit for restraint of
trade, unfair competition and conspiracy to monopolize against ACS and the
Schneider companies, alleging certain violations of state and federal
antitrust laws arising from the improper prosecution, enforcement and cross-
licensing of U.S. patents relating to rapid exchange balloon dilatation
angioplasty catheters. Suit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the
District of Massachusetts and seeks monetary, declaratory and injunctive
relief. The defendants have moved for dismissal.

On March 12, 1996, ACS filed two suits for patent infringement against SCIMED,
alleging in one case the willful infringement of a U.S. patent by SCIMED's
EXPRESS PLUS, EXPRESS PLUS II and LEAP EXPRESS PLUS PTCA catheters, and in the
other case the willful infringement of a U.S. patent by SCIMED's BANDIT(TM)
PTCA catheter. The suits were filed in the U.S. District Court for the
Northern District of California and seek monetary and injunctive relief.
SCIMED has answered, denying the allegations of both complaints.

On November 9, 1994, Target Therapeutics, Inc. (Target) filed a lawsuit in the
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California alleging that
SCIMED's VENTURE and VENTURE II microcatheters infringe a patent assigned to
Target. On May 2, 1996, the District Court entered an order granting a
preliminary injunction prohibiting SCIMED from marketing or selling the
accused product. On July 1, 1996, the Court of Appeals for the Federal
Circuit stayed the preliminary injunction pending a decision on SCIMED's
appeal of the District Court's order.

On April 5, 1995, C.R. Bard, Inc. (Bard) filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District
Court for the District of Delaware alleging that certain Company products,
including the Company's Max Force TTS(TM) catheter, infringes a patent
assigned to Bard. The lawsuit seeks a declaratory judgment that the Company
has infringed the Bard patent, as well as a monetary and injunctive relief.
The Company has answered, denying the allegations of the complaint.

On March 7, 1996, Cook Inc. filed suit in the Regional Court, Munich, Division
for Patent Disputes in Munich Germany against MinTec, Inc. Minimally Invasive
Technologies as named defendant alleging that the Cragg EndoPro(TM) System I
and Stentor(TM) endovascular devices infringe a certain Cook patent. Since
the purchase of the assets of the Endotech/MinTec companies by the Company,
the Company has assumed control of the litigation. The defendant's answer has
not been filed.

On March 25, 1996, Cordis Corporation, a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson
Company, filed a suit for patent infringement against SCIMED, alleging the
infringement of five U.S. patents by SCIMED's LEAP(TM) balloon material, used
in certain models of SCIMED's BANDIT and EXPRESS PLUS products. The suit was
filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota and seeks
monetary and injunctive relief. SCIMED has answered, denying the allegations
of the complaint.

On September 1, 1995, a purported class action lawsuit was filed in the Court
of Chancery in the State of Delaware in and for New Castle County, captioned
Kinder v. Auth, et al., alleging breaches of fiduciary duty by the Board of
Directors of Heart Technology, Heart Technology and the Company in connection
with the Agreement and Plan of Merger entered into between the Company and
Heart Technology. In January 1996, the parties agreed to settle the suit for
an amount the Company does not deem to be material.

On June 12, 1995, the Trustee in Bankruptcy for SMEC, Inc. filed a complaint
in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Nashville, Tennessee alleging that a
transaction between Datascope Corp. and the Company constitutes a fraudulent
settlement of prior litigation among the Trustee, Datascope Corp., IABP Corp.
and the Company. The complaint further alleges violation of the Racketeer
Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act. The Company has answered, denying
the allegations of the complaint.

The Company is involved in various other lawsuits from time to time. In
management's opinion, the Company is not currently involved in any legal
proceedings other than those specifically identified above which, individually
or in the aggregate, could have a material effect on the financial condition,
operations or cash flows of the Company. The Company has insurance coverage
which management believes is adequate to protect against such product
liability losses as could otherwise materially affect the Company's financial
position.

The Company believes that it has meritorious defenses against claims that it
has infringed patents of others. However, there can be no assurance that the
Company will prevail in any particular case. An adverse outcome in one or
more cases in which the Company's products are accused of patent infringement
could have a material adverse effect on the Company.

Item 4: Submissions of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

The Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company was held on May 10, 1996, to
consider and vote upon proposals to (i) elect three Class I Directors of the
Company, to hold office until the 1999 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the
Company, and until their respective successors are chosen and qualified or
until their earlier resignation, death or removal, (ii) approve amendments to
the Boston Scientific Corporation 1995 Long-Term Incentive Plan, (iii) approve
amendments to the Boston Scientific Corporation 1992 Non-Employee Directors'
Stock Option Plan, and (iv) approve amendments to the Boston Scientific
Corporation Employee Stock Option Plan. Charles J, Aschauer, Jr., Pete M.
Nicholas and Randall F. Bellows were elected as Class I Directors of the
Company by a vote of 155,914,808, 155,620,318, and 155,888,835 for,
respectively, and 2,410,489, 2,704,979, and 2,436,462 withheld, respectively.
The second proposal was approved by a vote of 111,501,389 for, 30,759,605
against, 159,650 abstaining, and 15,904,,653 broker nonvotes. The third
proposal was approved by a vote of 153,028,862 for, 5,020,575 against, 275,860
abstaining and no broker nonvotes. The fourth proposal was approved by a vote
of 139,998,860 for, 2,265,629 against, 156,155 abstaining and 15,904,653
broker nonvotes.

Item 6: Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

(a) Exhibits

Exhibit 10.1 - Form of Credit Agreement dated June 7, 1996
among the Company, The Several Lenders and
certain other parties.

Exhibit 11 - Computation of Earnings Per Share

(b) The following reports were filed during the quarter ended
June 30, 1996:

Form 8-K Date of Event Description
- -------- ------------- -----------

Item 5 May 3, 1996 Completion of the Company's acquisition of
certain assets from Endotech Ltd. and MinTec,
Inc. and certain related companies.

Form 8-K/A
- ----------

Item 7 March 14, 1996 Execution of Purchase Agreement by and between
Boston Scientific Corporation and American
Home Products Corporation dated January 25,
1996; Amended to reflect withdrawal of
confidential treatment request with respect to
certain sections of the Purchase Agreement.



SIGNATURE
---------

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized on August 14, 1996.

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION

By: /s/ Lawrence C. Best
Name: Lawrence C. Best
Title: Chief Financial Officer and
Senior Vice President -
Finance and Administration