Companies:
10,660
total market cap:
$140.341 T
Sign In
๐บ๐ธ
EN
English
$ USD
โฌ
EUR
๐ช๐บ
โน
INR
๐ฎ๐ณ
ยฃ
GBP
๐ฌ๐ง
$
CAD
๐จ๐ฆ
$
AUD
๐ฆ๐บ
$
NZD
๐ณ๐ฟ
$
HKD
๐ญ๐ฐ
$
SGD
๐ธ๐ฌ
Global ranking
Ranking by countries
America
๐บ๐ธ United States
๐จ๐ฆ Canada
๐ฒ๐ฝ Mexico
๐ง๐ท Brazil
๐จ๐ฑ Chile
Europe
๐ช๐บ European Union
๐ฉ๐ช Germany
๐ฌ๐ง United Kingdom
๐ซ๐ท France
๐ช๐ธ Spain
๐ณ๐ฑ Netherlands
๐ธ๐ช Sweden
๐ฎ๐น Italy
๐จ๐ญ Switzerland
๐ต๐ฑ Poland
๐ซ๐ฎ Finland
Asia
๐จ๐ณ China
๐ฏ๐ต Japan
๐ฐ๐ท South Korea
๐ญ๐ฐ Hong Kong
๐ธ๐ฌ Singapore
๐ฎ๐ฉ Indonesia
๐ฎ๐ณ India
๐ฒ๐พ Malaysia
๐น๐ผ Taiwan
๐น๐ญ Thailand
๐ป๐ณ Vietnam
Others
๐ฆ๐บ Australia
๐ณ๐ฟ New Zealand
๐ฎ๐ฑ Israel
๐ธ๐ฆ Saudi Arabia
๐น๐ท Turkey
๐ท๐บ Russia
๐ฟ๐ฆ South Africa
>> All Countries
Ranking by categories
๐ All assets by Market Cap
๐ Automakers
โ๏ธ Airlines
๐ซ Airports
โ๏ธ Aircraft manufacturers
๐ฆ Banks
๐จ Hotels
๐ Pharmaceuticals
๐ E-Commerce
โ๏ธ Healthcare
๐ฆ Courier services
๐ฐ Media/Press
๐ท Alcoholic beverages
๐ฅค Beverages
๐ Clothing
โ๏ธ Mining
๐ Railways
๐ฆ Insurance
๐ Real estate
โ Ports
๐ผ Professional services
๐ด Food
๐ Restaurant chains
โ๐ป Software
๐ Semiconductors
๐ฌ Tobacco
๐ณ Financial services
๐ข Oil&Gas
๐ Electricity
๐งช Chemicals
๐ฐ Investment
๐ก Telecommunication
๐๏ธ Retail
๐ฅ๏ธ Internet
๐ Construction
๐ฎ Video Game
๐ป Tech
๐ฆพ AI
>> All Categories
ETFs
๐ All ETFs
๐๏ธ Bond ETFs
๏ผ Dividend ETFs
โฟ Bitcoin ETFs
โข Ethereum ETFs
๐ช Crypto Currency ETFs
๐ฅ Gold ETFs & ETCs
๐ฅ Silver ETFs & ETCs
๐ข๏ธ Oil ETFs & ETCs
๐ฝ Commodities ETFs & ETNs
๐ Emerging Markets ETFs
๐ Small-Cap ETFs
๐ Low volatility ETFs
๐ Inverse/Bear ETFs
โฌ๏ธ Leveraged ETFs
๐ Global/World ETFs
๐บ๐ธ USA ETFs
๐บ๐ธ S&P 500 ETFs
๐บ๐ธ Dow Jones ETFs
๐ช๐บ Europe ETFs
๐จ๐ณ China ETFs
๐ฏ๐ต Japan ETFs
๐ฎ๐ณ India ETFs
๐ฌ๐ง UK ETFs
๐ฉ๐ช Germany ETFs
๐ซ๐ท France ETFs
โ๏ธ Mining ETFs
โ๏ธ Gold Mining ETFs
โ๏ธ Silver Mining ETFs
๐งฌ Biotech ETFs
๐ฉโ๐ป Tech ETFs
๐ Real Estate ETFs
โ๏ธ Healthcare ETFs
โก Energy ETFs
๐ Renewable Energy ETFs
๐ก๏ธ Insurance ETFs
๐ฐ Water ETFs
๐ด Food & Beverage ETFs
๐ฑ Socially Responsible ETFs
๐ฃ๏ธ Infrastructure ETFs
๐ก Innovation ETFs
๐ Semiconductors ETFs
๐ Aerospace & Defense ETFs
๐ Cybersecurity ETFs
๐ฆพ Artificial Intelligence ETFs
Watchlist
Account
Citigroup
C
#77
Rank
$219.52 B
Marketcap
๐บ๐ธ
United States
Country
$122.69
Share price
6.00%
Change (1 day)
52.33%
Change (1 year)
๐ฆ Banks
๐ณ Financial services
Categories
Market cap
Revenue
Earnings
Price history
P/E ratio
P/S ratio
More
Price history
P/E ratio
P/S ratio
P/B ratio
Operating margin
EPS
Stock Splits
Dividends
Dividend yield
Shares outstanding
Fails to deliver
Cost to borrow
Total assets
Total liabilities
Total debt
Cash on Hand
Net Assets
Annual Reports (10-K)
Citigroup
Quarterly Reports (10-Q)
Financial Year FY2018 Q3
Citigroup - 10-Q quarterly report FY2018 Q3
Text size:
Small
Medium
Large
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2018
Commission file number 1-9924
Citigroup Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
52-1568099
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
388 Greenwich Street, New York, NY
(Address of principal executive offices)
10013
(Zip code)
(212) 559-1000
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
x
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes
x
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," "smaller reporting company" and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
x
Accelerated filer
o
Non-accelerated filer
o
Smaller reporting company
o
Emerging growth company
o
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. Yes
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes
o
No
x
Number of shares of Citigroup Inc. common stock outstanding on
September 30, 2018
: 2,442,136,813
Available on the web at www.citigroup.com
CITIGROUP’S
THIRD
QUARTER
2018
—FORM
10-Q
OVERVIEW
1
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
3
Executive Summary
3
Summary of Selected Financial Data
6
SEGMENT AND BUSINESS—INCOME (LOSS)
AND REVENUES
8
SEGMENT BALANCE SHEET
9
Global Consumer Banking (GCB)
10
North America GCB
12
Latin America GCB
14
Asia GCB
16
Institutional Clients Group
18
Corporate/Other
23
OFF-BALANCE SHEET
ARRANGEMENTS
24
CAPITAL RESOURCES
25
MANAGING GLOBAL RISK TABLE OF
CONTENTS
38
MANAGING GLOBAL RISK
39
INCOME TAXES
76
FUTURE APPLICATION OF ACCOUNTING
STANDARDS
77
DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND
PROCEDURES
78
DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO SECTION 219 OF
THE IRAN THREAT REDUCTION AND SYRIA
HUMAN RIGHTS ACT
78
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
79
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
81
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
82
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
90
UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES,
PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND
DIVIDENDS
206
OVERVIEW
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with Citigroup’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2017
(2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K) and Citigroup’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 2018 (First Quarter of 2018 Form 10-Q) and June 30, 2018 (Second Quarter of 2018 Form 10-Q).
Additional information about Citigroup is available on Citi’s website at
www.citigroup.com
. Citigroup’s annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and proxy statements, as well as other filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), are available free of charge through Citi’s website by clicking on the “Investors” page and selecting “All SEC Filings.” The SEC’s website also contains current reports on Form 8-K, and other information regarding Citi at
www.sec.gov
.
Certain reclassifications, including a realignment of certain businesses, have been made to the prior periods’ financial statements and disclosures to conform to the current period’s presentation. For additional information on certain recent reclassifications, see Notes 1 and 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements below and Notes 1 and 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Citi’s 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Throughout this report, “Citigroup,” “Citi” and “the Company” refer to Citigroup Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.
1
Citigroup is managed pursuant to two business segments:
Global Consumer Banking
and
Institutional Clients Group
, with the remaining operations in
Corporate/Other.
The following are the four regions in which Citigroup operates. The regional results are fully reflected in the segment results above.
(1)
Latin America GCB
consists of Citi’s consumer banking business
in Mexico.
(2)
Asia GCB
includes the results of operations of
GCB
activities in certain
EMEA
countries for all periods presented.
(3)
North America
includes the U.S., Canada and Puerto Rico,
Latin America
includes Mexico and
Asia
includes Japan.
2
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Third Quarter of 2018—Solid Operating Results and Continued Momentum
As described further throughout this Executive Summary, Citi reported solid operating results in the third quarter of 2018, reflecting continued momentum across businesses and geographies, including in many of the areas where Citi has been making ongoing investments.
During the third quarter of 2018, Citi had solid revenue growth across treasury and trade solutions, fixed income markets, securities services and the private bank in the
Institutional Clients Group (ICG)
and in international
Global Consumer Banking (GCB)
, with particular strength in
Latin America GCB.
Results in the current quarter and prior-year period also reflected the impact of gains on sale of businesses in
ICG
and
Latin America GCB
(see “Citigroup” below). During the quarter, Citi continued to demonstrate expense and credit discipline, resulting in positive operating leverage and an improvement in pretax earnings. Citi also had broad-based loan growth in
GCB
and
ICG
, as well as deposit growth.
In addition, Citi continued to return capital to its shareholders. In the quarter, Citi returned $6.4 billion in the form of common stock repurchases and dividends. Citi repurchased approximately 75 million common shares during the quarter and over 200 million over the last 12 months, resulting in an 8% reduction in outstanding common shares from the prior-year period. Despite the continued progress in returning capital to shareholders during the quarter, each of Citi’s key regulatory capital metrics remained strong (see “Capital” below).
While global economic growth has continued and the macroeconomic environment remains largely positive, there continue to be various economic, political and other risks and uncertainties that could impact Citi’s businesses and future results. For a discussion of the risks and uncertainties that could impact Citi’s businesses, results of operations and financial condition during the remainder of 2018, see each respective business’s results of operations and “Forward-Looking Statements” below, as well as each respective business’s results of operations and the “Managing Global Risk” and “Risk Factors” sections in Citi’s 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Third Quarter of 2018 Summary Results
Citigroup
Citigroup reported net income of $4.6 billion, or $1.73 per share, compared to net income of $4.1 billion, or $1.42 per share, in the prior-year period. The 12% increase in net income was primarily driven by a lower effective tax rate due to the impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (Tax Reform), and also reflected lower expenses and lower cost of credit. Earnings per share increased 22% due to the growth in net income and the 8% reduction in average shares outstanding driven by the common stock repurchases.
Citigroup revenues of $18.4 billion in the third quarter of 2018 were largely unchanged from the prior-year period, primarily reflecting the net impact of a gain on sale (approximately $580 million) of a fixed income analytics business in
ICG
in the prior-year period and a gain on sale (approximately $250 million) of an asset management business in
Latin America GCB
in the current quarter as well as the impact of foreign currency translation (which increased reported revenues in the prior-year period by $335 million). Excluding the gains on sale as well as the impact of foreign currency translation in U.S. dollars for reporting purposes (FX translation), revenues increased 4%, driven by growth in
ICG
(Citi’s results of operations excluding the gains on sale as well as the impact of FX translation are non-GAAP financial measures).
Citigroup’s end-of-period loans increased 3% to $675 billion versus the prior-year period. Excluding the impact of FX translation, Citigroup’s end-of-period loans grew 4%, as 6% aggregate growth in
GCB
and
ICG
was partially offset by the continued wind-down of legacy assets in
Corporate/Other
. Citigroup’s end-of-period deposits increased 4% to $1.0 trillion versus the prior-year period. Excluding the impact of FX translation, Citigroup’s deposits increased 5%, primarily driven by 8% growth in
ICG
deposits.
Expenses
Citigroup operating expenses of $10.3 billion decreased 1% versus the prior-year period, as the impact of higher volume-related expenses and ongoing investments was more than offset by efficiency savings and the wind-down of legacy assets. Year-over-year,
GCB
operating expenses were up 5% and
ICG
operating expenses increased 1%, while
Corporate/Other
operating expenses declined 44%, all versus the prior-year period.
Cost of Credit
Citi’s total provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims of $2.0 billion decreased 1% from the prior-year period. The decrease was primarily driven by lower net loan loss reserve builds in both Citi retail services and Citi-branded cards in
North America GCB
, partially offset by a net loan loss reserve build in
ICG
,
driven by volume growth
.
Net credit losses of $1.8 billion declined 1% versus the prior-year period. Consumer net credit losses of $1.7 billion were largely unchanged from the prior-year period. Corporate net credit losses decreased from $43 million in the prior-year period to $30 million.
For additional information on Citi’s consumer and corporate credit costs and allowance for loan losses, see each respective business’s results of operations and “Credit Risk” below.
Capital
Citigroup’s Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) Capital and Tier 1 Capital ratios, on a fully implemented basis, were 11.7% and 13.4% as of September 30, 2018, respectively, compared to
3
13.0% and 14.6% as of September 30, 2017, both based on the Basel III Standardized Approach for determining risk-weighted assets. The decline in regulatory capital ratios reflected the return of capital to common shareholders, the previously disclosed approximate $6 billion reduction in CET1 Capital in the fourth quarter of 2017 due to the impact of Tax Reform as well as an increase in risk-weighted assets, partially offset by net income. Citigroup’s Supplementary Leverage ratio as of September 30, 2018, on a fully implemented basis, was 6.5%, compared to 7.1% as of September 30, 2017. For additional information on Citi’s capital ratios and related components, including the impact of Tax Reform on its capital ratios, see “Capital Resources” below.
Global Consumer Banking
GCB
net income of $1.6 billion increased 34%, driven primarily by lower cost of credit and a lower effective tax rate, as well as the gain on sale in
Latin America GCB
, partially offset by higher expenses. Operating expenses were $4.7 billion, up 5%, or 6% excluding the impact of FX translation, driven by the timing of investment spending versus the prior-year period.
GCB
revenues of $8.7 billion increased 2% versus the prior-year period, and 3% excluding the impact of FX translation, driven primarily by strength in
Latin America GCB
as well as the gain on sale.
North America GCB
revenues decreased 1% to $5.1 billion, as higher revenues in Citi retail services were more than offset by lower revenues in Citi-branded cards and retail banking. Citi-branded cards revenues of $2.1 billion were down 3% versus the prior-year period, as growth in interest-earning balances was more than offset by the impact of the previously disclosed Hilton portfolio sale as well as previously disclosed partnership terms. Citi retail services
revenues of $1.7 billion increased 2% versus the prior-year period, primarily reflecting organic loan growth and the benefit of the L.L.Bean portfolio acquisition, partially offset by higher partner payments. Retail banking revenues decreased 3% from the prior-year period to $1.3 billion. Excluding mortgage revenues, retail banking revenues of $1.2 billion were up 1% from the prior-year period, driven by continued growth in deposit margins and investments, largely offset by lower episodic transaction activity in commercial banking.
North America GCB
average deposits of $180 billion decreased 2% year-over-year, primarily driven by a reduction in money market balances, as clients transferred money to investments.
North America GCB
average retail loans of $56 billion grew 1% year-over-year and assets under management of $64 billion grew 9%. Average Citi-branded card loans of $88 billion increased 3%, while Citi-branded card purchase sales of $87 billion increased 9% versus the prior-year period. Average Citi retail services loans of $49 billion increased 7% versus the prior-year period, while Citi retail services purchase sales of $22 billion were up 11%. For additional information on the results of operations of
North America GCB
for the third quarter of 2018, see “
Global Consumer Banking—North America GCB
” below.
International
GCB
revenues (consisting of
Latin America GCB
and
Asia GCB
(which includes the results of operations in certain
EMEA
countries)) increased 8%, versus the prior-year period to $3.5 billion. Excluding the impact of FX translation, international
GCB
revenues increased 11% versus the prior-year period. On this basis,
Latin America GCB
revenues increased 26% versus the prior-year period
,
including the gain on sale. Excluding the gain on sale,
Latin America GCB
revenues increased 8%,
driven by continued volume growth across commercial, mortgage and card loans as well as deposits.
Asia GCB
revenues increased 1%, as continued growth in deposit, cards and insurance revenues was largely offset by lower investment revenues due to weaker market sentiment. For additional information on the results of operations of
Latin America GCB
and
Asia GCB
for the third quarter of 2018, including the impact of FX translation,
see “
Global Consumer Banking—Latin America GCB
” and “
Global Consumer Banking—Asia GCB
” below.
Year-over-year, international
GCB
average deposits of $127 billion increased 5%, average retail loans of $90 billion increased 4%, assets under management of $105 billion increased 8%, average card loans of $24 billion increased 2% and card purchase sales of $26 billion increased 7%, all excluding the impact of FX translation.
Institutional Clients Group
ICG
net income of $3.1 billion
increased 2%, driven primarily by the lower effective tax rate, which more than offset the lower revenues as well as the higher cost of credit and operating expenses.
ICG
operating expenses increased 1% to $5.2 billion, driven by an increase in compensation costs, volume-related expenses and investments, partially offset by efficiency savings.
ICG
revenues were $9.2 billion in the third quarter of 2018, down 2% from the prior-year period, as a 1% increase in
Banking
revenues was more than offset by a 5% decrease in
Markets and securities services
,
reflecting the impact of the gain on sale in the prior-year period. Excluding the gain on sale in the prior-year period, revenues increased 4%, driven by growth in both
Markets and securities services
(up 8%) and
Banking
(up 1%). The increase in
Banking
revenues included the impact of $106 million of losses on loan hedges within corporate lending, compared to losses of $48 million in the prior-year period.
Banking
revenues of $4.9 billion (excluding the impact of losses on loan hedges within corporate lending) increased 2%, driven by solid growth in treasury and trade solutions, private bank and corporate lending
,
partially offset by lower revenues in investment banking. Investment banking revenues of $1.2 billion decreased 8% versus the prior-year period, as growth in advisory was more than offset by a decline in both debt and equity underwriting, reflecting lower market activity. Advisory revenues increased 9% to $262 million, equity underwriting revenues decreased 17% to $259 million and debt underwriting revenues decreased 9% to $660 million, all versus the prior-year period.
Treasury and trade solutions revenues of $2.3 billion increased 4% versus the prior-year period, and 8% excluding the impact of FX translation, reflecting continued growth in
4
transaction volumes, loans and deposits. Private bank revenues increased 7% to $849 million versus the prior-year period, driven by growth in loans and investments, as well as improved deposit spreads. Corporate lending revenues were largely unchanged at $457 million. Excluding the impact of losses on loan hedges, corporate lending revenues increased 11% versus the prior-year period, primarily driven by loan growth and lower hedging costs.
Markets and securities services
revenues of $4.5 billion decreased 5% from the prior-year period. Excluding the gain on sale,
Markets and securities services
increased 8%, driven by revenue growth in both fixed income and equity markets
as well as securities services.
Fixed income markets revenues of $3.2 billion increased 9% from the prior-year period, with contributions from both rates and currencies as well as spread products. Equity markets revenues of $792 million increased 1% from the prior-year period, as strength in prime finance and derivatives was largely offset by lower revenues in cash equities, reflecting a more challenging trading environment and lower commissions. Securities services revenues of $672 million increased 11%, and 15% excluding the impact of FX translation, driven by continued growth in client volumes and higher net interest revenue. For additional information on the results of operations of
ICG
for the third quarter of 2018, see “
Institutional Clients Group
” below.
Corporate/Other
Corporate/Other
net loss was $67 million in the third quarter of 2018, compared to a net loss of $83 million in the prior-year period. Operating expenses of $459 million declined 44% from the prior-year period, largely reflecting the wind-down of legacy assets as well as lower infrastructure costs.
Corporate/Other
revenues were $494 million, down 5% from the prior-year period, primarily reflecting the continued wind-down of legacy assets.
For additional information on the results of operations of
Corporate/Other
for the third quarter of 2018, see “
Corporate/Other
” below.
5
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
SUMMARY OF SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA—PAGE 1
Citigroup Inc. and Consolidated Subsidiaries
Third Quarter
Nine Months
In millions of dollars, except per-share amounts and ratios
2018
2017
% Change
2018
2017
% Change
Net interest revenue
$
11,802
$
11,535
2
%
$
34,639
$
33,748
3
%
Non-interest revenue
6,587
6,884
(4
)
21,091
21,192
—
Revenues, net of interest expense
$
18,389
$
18,419
—
%
$
55,730
$
54,940
1
%
Operating expenses
10,311
10,417
(1
)
31,948
31,900
—
Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims
1,974
1,999
(1
)
5,643
5,378
5
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
$
6,104
$
6,003
2
%
$
18,139
$
17,662
3
%
Income taxes
(1)
1,471
1,866
(21
)
4,356
5,524
(21
)
Income from continuing operations
$
4,633
$
4,137
12
%
$
13,783
$
12,138
14
%
Income (loss) from discontinued operations,
net of taxes
(2)
(8
)
(5
)
(60
)
—
(2
)
100
Net income before attribution of noncontrolling
interests
$
4,625
$
4,132
12
%
$
13,783
$
12,136
14
%
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
3
(1
)
NM
51
41
24
Citigroup’s net income
$
4,622
$
4,133
12
%
$
13,732
$
12,095
14
%
Less:
Preferred dividends—Basic
$
270
$
272
(1
)%
$
860
$
893
(4
)%
Dividends and undistributed earnings allocated to employee restricted and deferred shares that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends, applicable to basic EPS
51
53
(4
)
151
156
(3
)
Income allocated to unrestricted common shareholders
for basic and diluted EPS
$
4,301
$
3,808
13
%
$
12,721
$
11,046
15
%
Earnings per share
Basic
Income from continuing operations
$
1.74
$
1.42
23
%
$
5.04
$
4.05
24
%
Net income
1.73
1.42
22
5.04
4.05
24
Diluted
Income from continuing operations
$
1.74
$
1.42
23
%
$
5.04
$
4.05
24
%
Net income
1.73
1.42
22
5.04
4.05
24
Dividends declared per common share
0.45
0.32
41
1.09
0.64
70
Table continues on the next page, including footnotes.
6
SUMMARY OF SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA—PAGE 2
Citigroup Inc. and Consolidated Subsidiaries
Third Quarter
Nine Months
In millions of dollars, except per-share amounts, ratios and direct staff
2018
2017
% Change
2018
2017
% Change
At September 30:
Total assets
$
1,925,165
$
1,889,133
2
%
Total deposits
1,005,176
964,038
4
Long-term debt
235,270
232,673
1
Citigroup common stockholders’ equity
(1)
177,969
208,381
(15
)
Total Citigroup stockholders’ equity
(1)
197,004
227,634
(13
)
Direct staff
(in thousands)
206
213
(3
)
Performance metrics
Return on average assets
0.95
%
0.87
%
0.96
%
0.87
%
Return on average common stockholders’ equity
(1)(3)
9.6
7.3
9.5
7.2
Return on average total stockholders’ equity
(1)(3)
9.2
7.2
9.2
7.1
Efficiency ratio (total operating expenses/total revenues)
56.1
56.6
57.3
58.1
Basel III ratios—full implementation
(1)(4)
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital
(5)
11.73
%
12.98
%
Tier 1 Capital
(5)
13.36
14.61
Total Capital
(5)
15.98
16.95
Supplementary Leverage ratio
6.50
7.11
Citigroup common stockholders’ equity to assets
(1)
9.24
%
11.03
%
Total Citigroup stockholders’ equity to assets
(1)
10.23
12.05
Dividend payout ratio
(6)
26.0
22.5
21.6
%
15.8
%
Total payout ratio
(7)
147.0
164.6
98.1
96.5
Book value per common share
(1)
$
72.88
$
78.81
(8
)%
Tangible book value (TBV) per share
(1)(8)
61.91
68.55
(10
)
(1)
The third quarter and nine months of 2018 reflect the impact of Tax Reform. For additional information on Tax Reform, including the impact on Citi’s fourth quarter and full-year 2017 results, see Citi’s
2017
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(2)
See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on Citi’s discontinued operations.
(3)
The return on average common stockholders’ equity is calculated using net income less preferred stock dividends divided by average common stockholders’ equity. The return on average total Citigroup stockholders’ equity is calculated using net income divided by average Citigroup stockholders’ equity.
(4)
Citi’s risk-based capital and leverage ratios as of September 30, 2017 are non-GAAP financial measures, which reflect full implementation of regulatory capital adjustments and deductions prior to the effective date of January 1, 2018.
(5)
Citi’s reportable Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) Capital and Tier 1 Capital ratios were the lower derived under the U.S. Basel III Standardized Approach and Citi’s reportable Total Capital ratios were derived under the U.S. Basel III Advanced Approaches for both periods presented. This reflects the U.S. Basel III requirement to report the lower of risk-based capital ratios under both the Standardized Approach and Advanced Approaches in accordance with the Collins Amendment of the Dodd-Frank Act.
(6)
Dividends declared per common share as a percentage of net income per diluted share.
(7)
Total common dividends declared plus common stock repurchases as a percentage of net income available to common shareholders. See “Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity,” Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements and “Equity Security Repurchases” below for the component details.
(8)
For information on TBV, see “Capital Resources—Tangible Common Equity, Book Value Per Share, Tangible Book Value Per Share and Returns on Equity” below.
NM Not meaningful
7
SEGMENT AND BUSINESS—INCOME (LOSS) AND REVENUES
CITIGROUP INCOME
Third Quarter
Nine Months
In millions of dollars
2018
2017
% Change
2018
2017
% Change
Income from continuing operations
Global Consumer Banking
North America
$
850
$
642
32
%
$
2,407
$
1,913
26
%
Latin America
334
169
98
717
445
61
Asia
(1)
383
359
7
1,116
938
19
Total
$
1,567
$
1,170
34
%
$
4,240
$
3,296
29
%
Institutional Clients Group
North America
$
870
$
1,298
(33
)%
$
2,755
$
3,463
(20
)%
EMEA
972
753
29
3,072
2,401
28
Latin America
541
388
39
1,546
1,211
28
Asia
734
623
18
2,310
1,778
30
Total
$
3,117
$
3,062
2
%
$
9,683
$
8,853
9
%
Corporate/Other
(51
)
(95
)
46
(140
)
(11
)
NM
Income from continuing operations
$
4,633
$
4,137
12
%
$
13,783
$
12,138
14
%
Discontinued operations
$
(8
)
$
(5
)
(60
)%
$
—
$
(2
)
100
%
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
3
(1
)
NM
51
41
24
Citigroup’s net income
$
4,622
$
4,133
12
%
$
13,732
$
12,095
14
%
(1)
Asia GCB
includes the results of operations of
GCB
activities in certain
EMEA
countries for all periods presented.
NM Not meaningful
CITIGROUP REVENUES
Third Quarter
Nine Months
In millions of dollars
2018
2017
% Change
2018
2017
% Change
Global Consumer Banking
North America
$
5,129
$
5,197
(1
)%
$
15,290
$
15,088
1
%
Latin America
1,670
1,388
20
4,398
3,863
14
Asia
(1)
1,855
1,885
(2
)
5,649
5,438
4
Total
$
8,654
$
8,470
2
%
$
25,337
$
24,389
4
%
Institutional Clients Group
North America
$
3,329
$
3,709
(10
)%
$
10,105
$
10,877
(7
)%
EMEA
2,927
2,703
8
9,137
8,438
8
Latin America
1,055
1,099
(4
)
3,427
3,354
2
Asia
1,930
1,919
1
6,111
5,501
11
Total
$
9,241
$
9,430
(2
)%
$
28,780
$
28,170
2
%
Corporate/Other
494
519
(5
)
1,613
2,381
(32
)
Total Citigroup net revenues
$
18,389
$
18,419
—
%
$
55,730
$
54,940
1
%
(1)
Asia GCB
includes the results of operations of
GCB
activities in certain
EMEA
countries for all periods presented.
8
SEGMENT BALANCE SHEET
(1)
In millions of dollars
Global
Consumer
Banking
Institutional
Clients
Group
Corporate/Other
and
consolidating
eliminations
(2)
Citigroup
parent company-
issued long-term
debt and
stockholders’
equity
(3)
Total
Citigroup
consolidated
Assets
Cash and deposits with banks
$
10,034
$
66,084
$
123,168
$
—
$
199,286
Federal funds sold and securities
borrowed and purchased under
agreements to resell
157
280,556
228
—
280,941
Trading account assets
754
249,904
6,844
—
257,502
Investments
1,271
108,942
235,300
—
345,513
Loans, net of unearned income and
allowance for loan losses
299,493
347,050
16,030
—
662,573
Other assets
37,605
105,200
36,545
—
179,350
Net inter-segment liquid assets
(4)
77,370
246,754
(324,124
)
—
—
Total assets
$
426,684
$
1,404,490
$
93,991
$
—
$
1,925,165
Liabilities and equity
Total deposits
$
310,689
$
684,623
$
9,864
$
—
$
1,005,176
Federal funds purchased and
securities loaned and sold under
agreements to repurchase
3,054
172,851
10
—
175,915
Trading account liabilities
141
147,115
396
—
147,652
Short-term borrowings
473
22,798
10,499
—
33,770
Long-term debt
(3)
1,831
41,351
43,905
148,183
235,270
Other liabilities
19,613
94,913
14,993
—
129,519
Net inter-segment funding (lending)
(3)
90,883
240,839
13,465
(345,187
)
—
Total liabilities
$
426,684
$
1,404,490
$
93,132
$
(197,004
)
$
1,727,302
Total stockholders’ equity
(5)
—
—
859
197,004
197,863
Total liabilities and equity
$
426,684
$
1,404,490
$
93,991
$
—
$
1,925,165
(1)
The supplemental information presented in the table above reflects Citigroup’s consolidated GAAP balance sheet by reporting segment as of
September 30, 2018
. The respective segment information depicts the assets and liabilities managed by each segment as of such date.
(2)
Consolidating eliminations for total Citigroup and Citigroup parent company assets and liabilities are recorded within
Corporate/Other
.
(3)
The total stockholders’ equity and the majority of long-term debt of Citigroup reside in the Citigroup parent company Consolidated Balance Sheet. Citigroup allocates stockholders’ equity and long-term debt to its businesses through inter-segment allocations as shown above.
(4)
Represents the attribution of Citigroup’s liquid assets (primarily consisting of cash, marketable equity securities, and available-for-sale debt securities) to the various businesses based on Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) assumptions.
(5)
Corporate/Other
equity represents noncontrolling interests.
9
GLOBAL CONSUMER BANKING
Global Consumer Banking (GCB)
consists of consumer banking businesses in
North America
,
Latin America
(consisting of Citi’s consumer banking business in Mexico) and
Asia
.
GCB
provides traditional banking services to retail customers through retail banking, including commercial banking, and Citi-branded cards and Citi retail services (for additional information on these businesses, see “Citigroup Segments” above and “Managing Global Risk—Consumer Credit” below).
GCB
is focused on its priority markets in the U.S., Mexico and
Asia
with 2,417 branches in 19 countries and jurisdictions as of
September 30, 2018
. At
September 30, 2018
,
GCB
had approximately $427 billion in assets and $311 billion in deposits.
GCB
’s overall strategy is to leverage Citi’s global footprint and be the pre-eminent bank for the emerging affluent and affluent consumers in large urban centers. In credit cards and in certain retail markets (including commercial banking), Citi serves customers in a somewhat broader set of segments and geographies.
Third Quarter
Nine Months
In millions of dollars except as otherwise noted
2018
2017
% Change
2018
2017
% Change
Net interest revenue
$
7,236
$
7,071
2
%
$
21,235
$
20,410
4
%
Non-interest revenue
1,418
1,399
1
4,102
3,979
3
Total revenues, net of interest expense
$
8,654
$
8,470
2
%
$
25,337
$
24,389
4
%
Total operating expenses
$
4,661
$
4,452
5
%
$
13,997
$
13,440
4
%
Net credit losses
$
1,714
$
1,704
1
%
$
5,176
$
4,922
5
%
Credit reserve build (release)
186
486
(62
)
484
788
(39
)
Provision (release) for unfunded lending commitments
6
(5
)
NM
8
—
NM
Provision for benefits and claims
27
28
(4
)
75
80
(6
)
Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims (LLR & PBC)
$
1,933
$
2,213
(13
)%
$
5,743
$
5,790
(1
)%
Income from continuing operations before taxes
$
2,060
$
1,805
14
%
$
5,597
$
5,159
8
%
Income taxes
493
635
(22
)
1,357
1,863
(27
)
Income from continuing operations
$
1,567
$
1,170
34
%
$
4,240
$
3,296
29
%
Noncontrolling interests
1
2
(50
)
4
7
(43
)
Net income
$
1,566
$
1,168
34
%
$
4,236
$
3,289
29
%
Balance Sheet data
(in billions of dollars)
Total EOP assets
$
427
$
419
2
%
Average assets
424
421
1
$
421
$
415
1
%
Return on average assets
1.47
%
1.10
%
1.35
%
1.06
%
Efficiency ratio
54
53
55
55
Average deposits
$
307
$
308
—
$
307
$
306
—
Net credit losses as a percentage of average loans
2.22
%
2.26
%
2.27
%
2.24
%
Revenue by business
Retail banking
$
3,717
$
3,521
6
%
$
10,677
$
10,024
7
%
Cards
(1)
4,937
4,949
—
14,660
14,365
2
Total
$
8,654
$
8,470
2
%
$
25,337
$
24,389
4
%
Income from continuing operations by business
Retail banking
$
666
$
546
22
%
$
1,770
$
1,298
36
%
Cards
(1)
901
624
44
2,470
1,998
24
Total
$
1,567
$
1,170
34
%
$
4,240
$
3,296
29
%
Table continues on the next page, including footnotes.
10
Foreign currency (FX) translation impact
Total revenue—as reported
$
8,654
$
8,470
2
%
$
25,337
$
24,389
4
%
Impact of FX translation
(2)
—
(106
)
—
(11
)
Total revenues—ex-FX
(3)
$
8,654
$
8,364
3
%
$
25,337
$
24,378
4
%
Total operating expenses—as reported
$
4,661
$
4,452
5
%
$
13,997
$
13,440
4
%
Impact of FX translation
(2)
—
(53
)
—
15
Total operating expenses—ex-FX
(3)
$
4,661
$
4,399
6
%
$
13,997
$
13,455
4
%
Total provisions for LLR & PBC—as reported
$
1,933
$
2,213
(13
)%
$
5,743
$
5,790
(1
)%
Impact of FX translation
(2)
—
(23
)
—
(12
)
Total provisions for LLR & PBC—ex-FX
(3)
$
1,933
$
2,190
(12
)%
$
5,743
$
5,778
(1
)%
Net income—as reported
$
1,566
$
1,168
34
%
$
4,236
$
3,289
29
%
Impact of FX translation
(2)
—
(18
)
—
(9
)
Net income—ex-FX
(3)
$
1,566
$
1,150
36
%
$
4,236
$
3,280
29
%
(1)
Includes both Citi-branded cards and Citi retail services.
(2)
Reflects the impact of FX translation into U.S. dollars at the
third
quarter of
2018
and year-to-date 2018 average exchange rates for all periods presented.
(3)
Presentation of this metric excluding FX translation is a non-GAAP financial measure.
NM Not meaningful
11
NORTH AMERICA GCB
North America GCB
provides traditional retail banking, including commercial banking, and its Citi-branded cards and Citi retail services card products to retail customers and small to mid-size businesses, as applicable, in the U.S.
North America GCB
’s U.S. cards product portfolio includes its proprietary portfolio (including the Citi Double Cash, Thank You and Value cards) and co-branded cards (including, among others, American Airlines and Costco) within Citi-branded cards as well as its co-brand and private label relationships (including, among others, Sears, The Home Depot, Best Buy and Macy’s) within Citi retail services.
As of
September 30, 2018
,
North America GCB
’s 692 retail bank branches are concentrated in the six key metropolitan areas of New York, Chicago, Miami, Washington, D.C., Los Angeles and San Francisco. Also as of
September 30, 2018
,
North America GCB
had approximately 9.0 million retail banking customer accounts, $56.3 billion in retail banking loans and $181.9 billion in deposits. In addition,
North America GCB
had approximately 120.2 million Citi-branded and Citi retail services credit card accounts with $137.8 billion in outstanding card loan balances, including the newly acquired $1.5 billion L.L.Bean portfolio.
Third Quarter
Nine Months
In millions of dollars, except as otherwise noted
2018
2017
% Change
2018
2017
% Change
Net interest revenue
$
4,984
$
4,825
3
%
$
14,514
$
14,074
3
%
Non-interest revenue
145
372
(61
)
776
1,014
(23
)
Total revenues, net of interest expense
$
5,129
$
5,197
(1
)%
$
15,290
$
15,088
1
%
Total operating expenses
$
2,668
$
2,482
7
%
$
7,979
$
7,677
4
%
Net credit losses
$
1,242
$
1,239
—
%
$
3,816
$
3,610
6
%
Credit reserve build (release)
116
463
(75
)
354
716
(51
)
Provision (release) for unfunded lending commitments
5
(3
)
NM
3
6
(50
)
Provision for benefits and claims
5
9
(44
)
16
23
(30
)
Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims
$
1,368
$
1,708
(20
)%
$
4,189
$
4,355
(4
)%
Income from continuing operations before taxes
$
1,093
$
1,007
9
%
$
3,122
$
3,056
2
%
Income taxes
243
365
(33
)
715
1,143
(37
)
Income from continuing operations
$
850
$
642
32
%
$
2,407
$
1,913
26
%
Noncontrolling interests
—
—
—
—
—
—
Net income
$
850
$
642
32
%
$
2,407
$
1,913
26
%
Balance Sheet data
(in billions of dollars)
Average assets
$
249
$
250
—
%
$
247
$
246
—
%
Return on average assets
1.35
%
1.02
%
1.30
%
1.04
%
Efficiency ratio
52
48
52
51
Average deposits
$
180.2
$
184.1
(2
)
$
180.3
$
184.6
(2
)
Net credit losses as a percentage of average loans
2.56
%
2.63
%
2.68
%
2.62
%
Revenue by business
Retail banking
$
1,329
$
1,366
(3
)%
$
3,984
$
3,916
2
%
Citi-branded cards
2,108
2,178
(3
)
6,402
6,353
1
Citi retail services
1,692
1,653
2
4,904
4,819
2
Total
$
5,129
$
5,197
(1
)%
$
15,290
$
15,088
1
%
Income from continuing operations by business
Retail banking
$
131
$
169
(22
)%
$
432
$
371
16
%
Citi-branded cards
375
342
10
1,109
890
25
Citi retail services
344
131
NM
866
652
33
Total
$
850
$
642
32
%
$
2,407
$
1,913
26
%
NM Not meaningful
12
3Q18 vs. 3Q17
Net income
increased 32%, due to lower cost of credit and a lower effective tax rate due to the impact of Tax Reform, partially offset by lower revenues and higher expenses.
Revenues
decreased 1%, as higher revenues in Citi retail services were more than offset by lower revenues in Citi-branded cards and retail banking.
Retail banking revenues decreased 3%. Excluding mortgage revenues (decline of 28%), retail banking revenues were up 1%, driven by continued growth in deposit margins and investments, largely offset by lower episodic transaction activity in commercial banking as well as increasing
rate sensitivity. Average deposits decreased 2% year-over-year, primarily driven by a reduction in money market balances, as clients transferred money to investments. Assets under management were up 9%. The decline in mortgage revenues was driven by lower origination activity and higher cost of funds, reflecting the higher interest rate environment.
Cards revenues decreased 1%. In Citi-branded cards, revenues decreased 3%, as growth in interest-earning balances was more than offset by the impact of the Hilton portfolio sale as well as previously disclosed partnership terms that went into effect earlier in 2018. Average loans increased 3% and purchase sales increased 9%.
Citi retail services revenues increased 2%, primarily reflecting organic loan growth and the benefit of the L.L.Bean portfolio acquisition, partially offset by higher partner payments. Average loans increased 7% and purchase sales increased 11%.
Expenses
increased 7%, driven by volume growth and
the timing of investment spending versus the prior-year period.
Provisions
decreased 20% from the prior-year period, driven by a lower net loan loss reserve build. The net loan loss reserve build in the current quarter was $121 million, primarily due to volume growth in both cards portfolios. This compares to a build of $460 million in the prior-year period, which included $300 million related to an increase in net flow rates in the later delinquency buckets in Citi retail services and a slight increase in delinquencies for the Citi-branded cards portfolio.
Net credit losses were largely unchanged at $1.2 billion, driven by higher net credit losses in Citi-branded cards (up 5% to $644 million) and Citi retail services (up 5% to $566 million), offset by a $56 million decrease in retail banking, driven by episodic charge-offs in the commercial portfolio in the prior-year period. The increase in the cards net credit losses primarily reflected volume growth and seasoning in both portfolios.
For additional information on
North America GCB
’s retail banking, including commercial banking, and its Citi-branded cards and Citi retail services portfolios, see “Credit Risk—Consumer Credit” below.
As part of its Citi retail services business, Citi issues co-brand and private label credit card products with Sears. As has been widely reported, on October 15, 2018, Sears filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection that includes, among other things, plans to close additional stores. The impact to Citi retail services, including on revenues due to reduced new
account acquisitions or lower purchase sales, will depend, among other things, on the magnitude and timing of the Sears store closures. Citi retail services could also incur additional costs related to customer communications, including to support spending activity on the predominantly general-purpose MasterCard portfolio. Citi does not currently expect the Chapter 11 filing to have an immediate or ongoing material impact on its consolidated results. For additional information, see “Forward-Looking Statements” below and “Risk-Factors—Strategic Risks” in Citi’s 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
2018 YTD vs. 2017 YTD
Net income
increased 26%, driven by higher revenues, a lower effective tax rate due to the impact of Tax Reform and lower cost of credit, partially offset by higher expenses.
Revenues
increased 1%, reflecting higher revenues across retail banking, Citi retail services and Citi-branded cards. Retail banking revenues increased 2%. Excluding mortgage revenues (decline of 24%), retail banking revenues increased 6%, driven by growth in deposit margins and investments. Cards revenues increased 1%. In Citi-branded cards, revenues increased 1% driven by the same factors described above, as well as the sale of the Hilton portfolio, which resulted in a gain of approximately $150 million in the first quarter of 2018. This gain was largely offset by the loss of operating revenues from the portfolio. Citi retail services revenues increased 2%, driven by the same factors described above.
Expenses
increased 4%, driven by the same factors described above, partially offset by efficiency savings.
Provisions
decreased 4%. Net credit losses increased 6%, driven by volume growth and seasoning in both cards portfolios. This increase was more than offset by a 51% decline in the net loan loss reserve build, driven by the same factors described above.
13
LATIN AMERICA GCB
Latin America GCB
provides traditional retail banking, including commercial banking, and its Citi-branded card products to retail customers and small to mid-size businesses in Mexico through Citibanamex, one of Mexico’s largest banks.
At
September 30, 2018
,
Latin America GCB
had 1,463 retail branches in Mexico, with approximately 29.1 million retail banking customer accounts, $21.0 billion in retail banking loans and $30.1 billion in deposits. In addition, the business had approximately 5.7 million Citi-branded card accounts with $5.8 billion in outstanding loan balances.
Third Quarter
Nine Months
% Change
In millions of dollars, except as otherwise noted
2018
2017
% Change
2018
2017
Net interest revenue
$
1,042
$
1,038
—
%
$
3,052
$
2,853
7
%
Non-interest revenue
(1)
628
350
79
1,346
1,010
33
Total revenues, net of interest expense
$
1,670
$
1,388
20
%
$
4,398
$
3,863
14
%
Total operating expenses
$
828
$
779
6
%
$
2,369
$
2,191
8
%
Net credit losses
$
307
$
295
4
%
$
863
$
825
5
%
Credit reserve build
31
44
(30
)
106
106
—
Provision (release) for unfunded lending commitments
—
(1
)
100
1
(2
)
NM
Provision for benefits and claims
22
19
16
59
57
4
Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims (LLR & PBC)
$
360
$
357
1
%
$
1,029
$
986
4
%
Income from continuing operations before taxes
$
482
$
252
91
%
$
1,000
$
686
46
%
Income taxes
148
83
78
283
241
17
Income from continuing operations
$
334
$
169
98
%
$
717
$
445
61
%
Noncontrolling interests
—
1
(100
)
—
4
(100
)
Net income
$
334
$
168
99
%
$
717
$
441
63
%
Balance Sheet data
(in billions of dollars)
Average assets
$
45
$
47
(4
)%
$
44
$
45
(2
)%
Return on average assets
2.94
%
1.42
%
2.18
%
1.31
%
Efficiency ratio
50
56
54
57
Average deposits
$
29.4
$
28.8
2
$
28.9
$
27.3
6
Net credit losses as a percentage of average loans
4.63
%
4.37
%
4.44
%
4.39
%
Revenue by business
Retail banking
$
1,265
$
992
28
%
$
3,230
$
2,781
16
%
Citi-branded cards
405
396
2
1,168
1,082
8
Total
$
1,670
$
1,388
20
%
$
4,398
$
3,863
14
%
Income from continuing operations by business
Retail banking
$
279
$
129
NM
$
572
$
310
85
%
Citi-branded cards
55
40
38
%
145
135
7
Total
$
334
$
169
98
%
$
717
$
445
61
%
14
FX translation impact
Total revenues—as reported
$
1,670
$
1,388
20
%
$
4,398
$
3,863
14
%
Impact of FX translation
(2)
—
(66
)
—
(45
)
Total revenues—ex-FX
(3)
$
1,670
$
1,322
26
%
$
4,398
$
3,818
15
%
Total operating expenses—as reported
$
828
$
779
6
%
$
2,369
$
2,191
8
%
Impact of FX translation
(2)
—
(31
)
—
(21
)
Total operating expenses—ex-FX
(3)
$
828
$
748
11
%
$
2,369
$
2,170
9
%
Provisions for LLR & PBC—as reported
$
360
$
357
1
%
$
1,029
$
986
4
%
Impact of FX translation
(2)
—
(17
)
—
(12
)
Provisions for LLR & PBC—ex-FX
(3)
$
360
$
340
6
%
$
1,029
$
974
6
%
Net income—as reported
$
334
$
168
99
%
$
717
$
441
63
%
Impact of FX translation
(2)
—
(11
)
—
(9
)
Net income—ex-FX
(3)
$
334
$
157
NM
$
717
$
432
66
%
(1)
Third quarter of 2018 includes an approximate $250 million gain on the sale of an asset management business. See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(2)
Reflects the impact of FX translation into U.S. dollars at the
third
quarter of
2018
and year-to-date 2018 average exchange rates for all periods presented.
(3)
Presentation of this metric excluding FX translation is a non-GAAP financial measure.
NM Not meaningful
The discussion of the results of operations for Latin America GCB below excludes the impact of FX translation for all periods presented. Presentations of the results of operations, excluding the impact of FX translation, are non-GAAP financial measures. For a reconciliation of certain of these metrics to the reported results, see the table above.
3Q18 vs. 3Q17
Net income
increased $177 million to $334 million, reflecting higher revenues and a lower effective tax rate as a result of Tax Reform, partially offset by higher expenses and cost of credit.
Revenues
increased 26%, including the gain on sale of an asset management business (approximately $250 million). For additional information, see Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Excluding the gain on sale, revenues
were up 8%, driven by increases in both retail banking and cards.
Retail banking revenues increased 34%. Excluding the gain on sale, retail banking revenues increased 8%, driven by continued growth across commercial and mortgage loans and deposits, as well as improved deposit spreads due to higher interest rates. Average loans grew 4%, average deposits grew 8% and assets under management grew 5%. Cards revenues increased 7%, due to continued volume growth, reflecting higher purchase sales (up 14%) and full-rate revolving loans. Average cards loans grew 6%.
Expenses
increased 11%, driven by volume growth, ongoing investment spending and higher repositioning charges, partially offset by efficiency savings.
Provisions
increased 6%, as higher net credit losses were partially offset by a lower net loan loss reserve build. The net credit loss increase primarily reflected an episodic commercial charge-off that was fully offset by a related loan loss reserve release.
For additional information on
Latin
America GCB
’s retail banking, including commercial banking, and its Citi-branded cards portfolios, see “Credit Risk—Consumer Credit” below.
2018 YTD vs. 2017 YTD
Year-to-date,
Latin America GCB
has experienced similar trends to those described above.
Net income
increased 66%, driven by the same factors described above.
Revenues
increased 15%, including the gain on sale in the third quarter of 2018. Excluding the gain on sale, revenues increased 9%, reflecting higher revenues in both retail banking and cards. Retail banking revenues increased 8%, driven by the same factors described above. Cards revenues increased 9%, driven by the same factors described above.
Expenses
increased 9%, driven by the same factors described above.
Provisions
increased 6%, driven by higher net credit losses and a higher net loan loss reserve build, primarily due to volume growth and seasoning in cards. The increase in net credit losses also reflected the episodic commercial charge-off that was fully offset by a related loan loss reserve release.
15
ASIA GCB
Asia GCB
provides traditional retail banking, including commercial banking, and its Citi-branded card products to retail customers and small to mid-size businesses, as applicable. During the
third
quarter of 2018,
Asia GCB
’s most significant revenues in
Asia
were from Singapore, Hong Kong, Korea, India, Australia, Taiwan, Thailand, Philippines, Indonesia and Malaysia. Included within
Asia GCB
, traditional retail banking and Citi-branded card products are also provided to retail customers in certain
EMEA
countries, primarily Poland, Russia and the United Arab Emirates.
At
September 30, 2018
, on a combined basis, the businesses had 262 retail branches, approximately 15.9 million retail banking customer accounts, $69.5 billion in retail banking loans and $98.7 billion in deposits. In addition, the businesses had approximately 15.4 million Citi-branded card accounts with $18.6 billion in outstanding loan balances.
Third Quarter
Nine Months
% Change
In millions of dollars, except as otherwise noted
(1)
2018
2017
% Change
2018
2017
Net interest revenue
$
1,210
$
1,208
—
%
$
3,669
$
3,483
5
%
Non-interest revenue
645
677
(5
)
1,980
1,955
1
Total revenues, net of interest expense
$
1,855
$
1,885
(2
)%
$
5,649
$
5,438
4
%
Total operating expenses
$
1,165
$
1,191
(2
)%
$
3,649
$
3,572
2
%
Net credit losses
$
165
$
170
(3
)%
$
497
$
487
2
%
Credit reserve build (release)
39
(21
)
NM
24
(34
)
NM
Provision (release) for unfunded lending commitments
1
(1
)
NM
4
(4
)
NM
Provisions for credit losses
$
205
$
148
39
%
$
525
$
449
17
%
Income from continuing operations before taxes
$
485
$
546
(11
)%
$
1,475
$
1,417
4
%
Income taxes
102
187
(45
)
359
479
(25
)
Income from continuing operations
$
383
$
359
7
%
$
1,116
$
938
19
%
Noncontrolling interests
1
1
—
4
3
33
Net income
$
382
$
358
7
%
$
1,112
$
935
19
%
Balance Sheet data
(in billions of dollars)
Average assets
$
130
$
124
5
%
$
130
$
124
5
%
Return on average assets
1.17
%
1.15
%
1.14
%
1.01
%
Efficiency ratio
63
63
65
66
Average deposits
$
97.6
$
95.2
3
$
98.1
$
94.1
4
Net credit losses as a percentage of average loans
0.75
%
0.78
%
0.75
%
0.77
%
Revenue by business
Retail banking
$
1,123
$
1,163
(3
)%
$
3,463
$
3,327
4
%
Citi-branded cards
732
722
1
2,186
2,111
4
Total
$
1,855
$
1,885
(2
)%
$
5,649
$
5,438
4
%
Income from continuing operations by business
Retail banking
$
256
$
248
3
%
$
766
$
617
24
%
Citi-branded cards
127
111
14
350
321
9
Total
$
383
$
359
7
%
$
1,116
$
938
19
%
16
FX translation impact
Total revenues—as reported
$
1,855
$
1,885
(2
)%
$
5,649
$
5,438
4
%
Impact of FX translation
(2)
—
(40
)
—
34
Total revenues—ex-FX
(3)
$
1,855
$
1,845
1
%
$
5,649
$
5,472
3
%
Total operating expenses—as reported
$
1,165
$
1,191
(2
)%
$
3,649
$
3,572
2
%
Impact of FX translation
(2)
—
(22
)
—
36
Total operating expenses—ex-FX
(3)
$
1,165
$
1,169
—
%
$
3,649
$
3,608
1
%
Provisions for loan losses—as reported
$
205
$
148
39
%
$
525
$
449
17
%
Impact of FX translation
(2)
—
(6
)
—
—
Provisions for loan losses—ex-FX
(3)
$
205
$
142
44
%
$
525
$
449
17
%
Net income—as reported
$
382
$
358
7
%
$
1,112
$
935
19
%
Impact of FX translation
(2)
—
(7
)
—
—
Net income—ex-FX
(3)
$
382
$
351
9
%
$
1,112
$
935
19
%
(1)
Asia GCB
includes the results of operations of
GCB
activities in certain
EMEA
countries for all periods presented.
(2)
Reflects the impact of FX translation into U.S. dollars at the
third
quarter of
2018
and year-to-date 2018 average exchange rates for all periods presented.
(3)
Presentation of this metric excluding FX translation is a non-GAAP financial measure.
NM Not meaningful
The discussion of the results of operations for Asia GCB below excludes the impact of FX translation for all periods presented. Presentations of the results of operations, excluding the impact of FX translation, are non-GAAP financial measures. For a reconciliation of certain of these metrics to the reported results, see the table above.
3Q18 vs. 3Q17
Net income
increased 9%, reflecting higher revenues and a lower effective tax rate as a result of Tax Reform, partially offset by higher cost of credit.
Revenues
increased 1%, driven by higher cards revenues, partially offset by lower retail banking revenues.
Retail banking revenues decreased 2%, as continued growth in deposit and insurance revenues was more than offset by lower investment revenues due to weaker market sentiment. Investment sales decreased 22%, while assets under management grew 9% and average deposits increased 4%. Retail lending revenues declined 1%, as volume growth in personal and commercial loans was more than offset by lower mortgage revenues due to spread compression. Average loans grew 4%.
Cards revenues increased 4%, driven by continued growth in average loans (up 2%) and purchase sales (up 6%).
Expenses
were largely unchanged, as volume-driven growth and ongoing investment spending were offset by efficiency savings.
Provisions
increased 44%, primarily driven by a net loan loss reserve build compared to a net loan loss reserve release in the prior-year period. Overall credit quality continued to remain stable in the region.
For additional information on
Asia
GCB
’s retail banking, including commercial banking, and its Citi-branded cards portfolios, see “Credit Risk—Consumer Credit” below.
2018 YTD vs. 2017 YTD
Year-to-date,
Asia GCB
has experienced similar trends to
those described above.
Net income
increased 19%, due to higher revenues and the lower effective tax rate, partially offset by higher expenses and a higher cost of credit.
Revenues
increased 3%, driven by continued momentum in retail banking and cards. Retail banking revenues increased 3%, driven by growth in deposits, partially offset by lower investment and mortgage revenues. Cards revenues were up 3%, driven by the same factors described above.
Expenses
increased 1%, as volume-driven growth and ongoing investment spending were partially offset by efficiency savings.
Provisions
were up 17%, primarily driven by a net loan loss reserve build compared to a release in the prior-year period and modestly higher net credit losses related to volume growth and seasoning.
17
INSTITUTIONAL CLIENTS GROUP
Institutional Clients Group (ICG)
includes
Banking
and
Markets and securities services
(for additional information on these businesses, see “Citigroup Segments” above).
ICG
provides corporate, institutional, public sector and high-net-worth clients around the world with a full range of wholesale banking products and services, including fixed income and equity sales and trading, foreign exchange, prime brokerage, derivative services, equity and fixed income research, corporate lending, investment banking and advisory services, private banking, cash management, trade finance and securities services.
ICG
transacts with clients in both cash instruments and derivatives, including fixed income, foreign currency, equity and commodity products.
ICG
revenue is generated primarily from fees and spreads associated with these activities.
ICG
earns fee income for assisting clients with transactional services and clearing, providing brokerage and investment banking services and other such activities. Such fees are recognized at the point in time when Citigroup’s performance under the terms of a contractual arrangement is completed, which is typically at the trade/execution date or closing of a transaction. Revenue generated from these activities is recorded in
Commissions and fees
and
Investment banking
. Revenue is also generated from assets under custody and administration, which is recognized as/when the associated promised service is satisfied, which normally occurs at the point in time the service is requested by the customer and provided by Citi. Revenue generated from these activities is primarily recorded in
Administration and other fiduciary fees
. For additional information on these various types of revenues, see Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
In addition, as a market maker,
ICG
facilitates transactions, including holding product inventory to meet client demand, and earns the differential between the price at which it buys and sells the products. These price differentials and the unrealized gains and losses on the inventory are recorded in
Principal transactions
(for additional information on
Principal transactions
revenue, see Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).
Other
primarily includes mark-to-market gains and losses on certain credit derivatives, gains and losses on available-for-sale (AFS) debt securities, gains and losses on equity securities not held in trading accounts, and other non-recurring gains and losses. Interest income earned on assets held, less interest paid to customers on deposits and long- and short-term debt, is recorded as
Net interest revenue
.
The amount and types of
Markets
revenues are impacted by a variety of interrelated factors, including market liquidity; changes in market variables such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates, equity prices, commodity prices and credit spreads, as well as their implied volatilities; investor confidence; and other macroeconomic conditions. Assuming all other market conditions do not change, increases in client activity levels or bid/offer spreads generally result in increases in revenues. However, changes in market conditions can significantly impact client activity levels, bid/offer spreads and the fair value of product inventory. For example, a decrease in market liquidity may increase bid/offer spreads, decrease client activity levels and widen credit spreads on product inventory positions.
ICG
’s management of the
Markets
businesses involves daily monitoring and evaluating of the above factors at the trading desk as well as the country level.
ICG
does not separately track the impact on total
Markets
revenues of the volume of transactions, bid/offer spreads, fair value changes of product inventory positions and economic hedges because, as noted above, these components are interrelated and are not deemed useful or necessary individually to manage the
Markets
businesses at an aggregate
level.
In the
Markets
businesses, client revenues are those revenues directly attributable to client transactions at the time of inception, including commissions, interest or fees earned. Client revenues do not include the results of client facilitation activities (for example, holding product inventory in anticipation of client demand) or the results of certain economic hedging activities.
ICG
’s international presence is supported by trading floors in approximately 80 countries and a proprietary network in 98 countries and jurisdictions. At
September 30, 2018
,
ICG
had approximately $1.4 trillion of assets and $685 billion of deposits, while two of its businesses—securities services and issuer services—managed approximately $18.0 trillion of assets under custody compared to $17.1 trillion at the end of the prior-year period.
18
Third Quarter
Nine Months
% Change
In millions of dollars, except as otherwise noted
2018
2017
% Change
2018
2017
Commissions and fees
$
1,085
$
1,100
(1
)%
$
3,425
$
3,230
6
%
Administration and other fiduciary fees
686
688
—
2,093
1,997
5
Investment banking
1,029
1,163
(12
)
3,260
3,516
(7
)
Principal transactions
2,447
1,827
34
7,689
6,709
15
Other
(1)
(18
)
704
NM
554
951
(42
)
Total non-interest revenue
$
5,229
$
5,482
(5
)%
$
17,021
$
16,403
4
%
Net interest revenue (including dividends)
4,012
3,948
2
11,759
11,767
—
Total revenues, net of interest expense
$
9,241
$
9,430
(2
)%
$
28,780
$
28,170
2
%
Total operating expenses
$
5,191
$
5,138
1
%
$
16,152
$
15,503
4
%
Net credit losses
$
23
$
44
(48
)%
$
127
$
140
(9
)%
Credit reserve build (release)
7
(38
)
NM
(136
)
(229
)
41
Provision (release) for unfunded lending commitments
41
(170
)
NM
64
(193
)
NM
Provisions for credit losses
$
71
$
(164
)
NM
$
55
$
(282
)
NM
Income from continuing operations before taxes
$
3,979
$
4,456
(11
)%
$
12,573
$
12,949
(3
)%
Income taxes
862
1,394
(38
)
2,890
4,096
(29
)
Income from continuing operations
$
3,117
$
3,062
2
%
$
9,683
$
8,853
9
%
Noncontrolling interests
(6
)
14
NM
21
47
(55
)
Net income
$
3,123
$
3,048
2
%
$
9,662
$
8,806
10
%
EOP assets
(in billions of dollars)
$
1,404
$
1,370
2
%
Average assets
(in billions of dollars)
1,402
1,369
2
$
1,399
$
1,349
4
%
Return on average assets
0.88
%
0.88
%
0.92
%
0.87
%
Efficiency ratio
56
54
56
55
Revenues by region
North America
$
3,329
$
3,709
(10
)%
$
10,105
$
10,877
(7
)%
EMEA
2,927
2,703
8
9,137
8,438
8
Latin America
1,055
1,099
(4
)
3,427
3,354
2
Asia
1,930
1,919
1
6,111
5,501
11
Total
$
9,241
$
9,430
(2
)%
$
28,780
$
28,170
2
%
Income from continuing operations by region
North America
$
870
$
1,298
(33
)%
$
2,755
$
3,463
(20
)%
EMEA
972
753
29
3,072
2,401
28
Latin America
541
388
39
1,546
1,211
28
Asia
734
623
18
2,310
1,778
30
Total
$
3,117
$
3,062
2
%
$
9,683
$
8,853
9
%
Average loans by region
(in billions of dollars)
North America
$
166
$
152
9
%
$
164
$
149
10
%
EMEA
82
71
15
80
68
18
Latin America
33
34
(3
)
33
34
(3
)
Asia
65
64
2
67
61
10
Total
$
346
$
321
8
%
$
344
$
312
10
%
EOP deposits by business
(in billions of dollars)
Treasury and trade solutions
$
470
$
428
10
%
All other
ICG
businesses
215
212
1
Total
$
685
$
640
7
%
(1)
Third quarter of 2017 includes an approximate $580 million gain on the sale of a fixed income analytics business.
NM Not meaningful
19
ICG Revenue Details—Excluding Gains (Losses) on Loan Hedges
Third Quarter
Nine Months
% Change
In millions of dollars
2018
2017
% Change
2018
2017
Investment banking
revenue details
Advisory
$
262
$
240
9
%
$
838
$
807
4
%
Equity underwriting
259
311
(17
)
810
870
(7
)
Debt underwriting
660
729
(9
)
2,085
2,400
(13
)
Total investment banking
$
1,181
$
1,280
(8
)%
$
3,733
$
4,077
(8
)%
Treasury and trade solutions
2,283
2,185
4
6,887
6,399
8
Corporate lending—excluding gains (losses) on loan hedges
(1)
563
506
11
1,673
1,425
17
Private bank
849
790
7
2,601
2,332
12
Total banking revenues (ex-gains (losses) on loan hedges)
$
4,876
$
4,761
2
%
$
14,894
$
14,233
5
%
Corporate lending—gains (losses) on loan hedges
(1)
$
(106
)
$
(48
)
NM
$
(60
)
$
(154
)
61
%
Total banking revenues (including gains (losses) on loan hedges), net of interest expense
$
4,770
$
4,713
1
%
$
14,834
$
14,079
5
%
Fixed income markets
$
3,199
$
2,936
9
%
$
9,693
$
9,888
(2
)%
Equity markets
792
785
1
2,759
2,312
19
Securities services
672
608
11
1,978
1,754
13
Other
(2)
(192
)
388
NM
(484
)
137
NM
Total markets and securities services revenues, net of interest expense
$
4,471
$
4,717
(5
)%
$
13,946
$
14,091
(1
)%
Total revenues, net of interest expense
$
9,241
$
9,430
(2
)%
$
28,780
$
28,170
2
%
Commissions and fees
$
165
$
171
(4
)%
$
523
$
471
11
%
Principal transactions
(3)
2,020
1,592
27
6,312
5,887
7
Other
84
130
(35
)
388
464
(16
)
Total non-interest revenue
$
2,269
$
1,893
20
%
$
7,223
$
6,822
6
%
Net interest revenue
930
1,043
(11
)
2,470
3,066
(19
)
Total fixed income markets
$
3,199
$
2,936
9
%
$
9,693
$
9,888
(2
)%
Rates and currencies
$
2,347
$
2,189
7
%
$
7,052
$
6,973
1
%
Spread products/other fixed income
852
747
14
2,641
2,915
(9
)
Total fixed income markets
$
3,199
$
2,936
9
%
$
9,693
$
9,888
(2
)%
Commissions and fees
$
284
$
309
(8
)%
$
953
$
958
(1
)%
Principal transactions
(3)
284
211
35
922
399
NM
Other
(3
)
(5
)
40
97
(2
)
NM
Total non-interest revenue
$
565
$
515
10
%
$
1,972
$
1,355
46
%
Net interest revenue
227
270
(16
)
787
957
(18
)
Total equity markets
$
792
$
785
1
%
$
2,759
$
2,312
19
%
(1)
Credit derivatives are used to economically hedge a portion of the corporate loan portfolio that includes both accrual loans and loans at fair value. Gains (losses) on loan hedges include the mark-to-market on the credit derivatives and the mark-to-market on the loans in the portfolio that are at fair value. The fixed premium costs of these hedges are netted against the corporate lending revenues to reflect the cost of credit protection. Citigroup’s results of operations excluding the impact of gains (losses) on loan hedges are non-GAAP financial measures.
(2)
Third quarter of 2017 includes an approximate $580 million gain on the sale of a fixed income analytics business.
(3)
Excludes principal transactions revenues of
ICG
businesses other than
Markets
, primarily treasury and trade solutions and the private bank.
NM Not meaningful
20
3Q18 vs. 3Q17
Net income
increased 2%, driven primarily by a lower effective tax rate due to Tax Reform, which more than offset lower revenues, higher cost of credit and expenses.
•
Revenues
decreased 2%, as a 1% increase in
Banking
revenues was more than offset by a 5% decrease in
Markets and securities services
, reflecting the impact of
the approximate $580 million gain on sale of a fixed income analytics business in the prior-year period. Excluding the gain on sale in the prior-year period, revenues were up 4%, driven by higher revenues in both
Banking
and
Markets and securities services
. The increase in
Banking
revenues was driven by improved performance in treasury and trade solutions and the private bank, partially offset by a decline in investment banking. Excluding the gain on sale,
Markets and securities services
revenues increased 8%, driven by higher revenues in fixed income markets and securities services.
Within
Banking
:
•
Investment banking
revenues declined 8%, driven by a drop in market wallet across all major products. Advisory revenues increased 9%, reflecting strong performance in
North America
. Equity underwriting revenues decreased 17%, driven by lower market wallet as well as a decline in market share. Debt underwriting revenues decreased 9%, due to the decline in market wallet despite gaining market share.
•
Treasury and trade solutions
revenues increased 4%. Excluding the impact of FX translation, revenues increased 8%, reflecting strength in all regions. Revenue growth in the cash business was primarily driven by continued growth in deposit balances and improved deposit spreads, as well as higher transaction volumes from both new and existing clients. Trade revenues were largely unchanged, as loan growth was offset by the tightening of loan spreads and lower episodic fees. Average deposit balances increased 7% (8% excluding the impact of FX translation), with strong growth in deposits across all regions. Average loans increased 3% (4% excluding the impact of FX translation), driven by
EMEA
and
Latin America
.
•
Corporate lending
revenues of $457 million were largely unchanged. Excluding the losses on loan hedges, revenues increased 11%, driven by lower hedging cost and higher loan volumes. Average loans increased 8% versus the prior-year period.
•
Private bank
revenues increased 7%, driven by
North America
and
EMEA
, reflecting higher deposit spreads, an increase in loans and higher managed investments revenues due to strong client activity.
Within
Markets and securities services
:
•
Fixed income markets
revenues increased 9%, driven by higher revenues in
EMEA
and
North America.
The increase in revenues was largely due to higher non-interest revenue (an increase of 20%) in rates and
currencies as well as spread products and other fixed income, partially offset by lower net interest revenue, mainly reflecting a change in the mix of trading positions in support of client activity as well as higher funding costs, given the higher interest rate environment. The increase in non-interest revenues was driven by higher principal transaction revenues (increase of 27%), primarily in rates and currencies, reflecting higher client activity and facilitation gains.
Rates and currencies revenues increased 7%, driven by higher G10 rates and G10 FX revenues in all regions, reflecting strength in corporate client activity, as well as benefiting from a continuation of volatility in the FX markets.
Spread products and other fixed income revenues increased 14%, primarily due to a comparison to a weak prior-year period, particularly in
North America
and
EMEA
.
•
Equity markets
revenues increased 1%, as growth in equity derivatives and prime finance was partially offset by lower cash equities revenues. Equity derivatives and prime finance revenues increased in
EMEA
,
North America
and
Asia
, driven by higher investor client activity and higher client balances. Cash equities revenues decreased across regions, reflecting a more challenging trading environment and lower commissions, as well as comparison to a strong prior-year period. Principal transactions revenues increased 35%, partially offset by a decrease in net interest revenue, mainly reflecting a change in the mix of trading positions in support of client activity.
•
Securities services
revenues increased 11%. Excluding the impact of FX translation, revenues increased 15%, reflecting growth in all regions. The increase in revenues was driven by higher fee revenues, reflecting growth in both client volumes and assets under custody, as well as higher net interest revenue driven by higher deposit volume and higher interest rates.
Expenses
increased 1%, driven by an increase in compensation costs, volume-related expenses and investments, partially offset by efficiency savings and a benefit from FX translation.
Provisions
increased $235 million to $71 million, driven by higher provisions for unfunded lending commitments (up $211 million) and a higher net loan loss reserve build (up $45 million), partially offset by lower net credit losses (down $21 million). The increase in provisions was largely driven by volume-related reserve builds and an absence of a large release in the prior-year period.
21
2018 YTD vs. 2017 YTD
Net income
increased 10%, primarily driven by higher revenues and a lower effective tax rate due to the impact of Tax Reform, partially offset by higher expenses and higher credit costs.
•
Revenues increased 2%, driven by a 5% increase in
Banking
revenues, partially offset by a 1% decrease in
Markets and securities services
revenues. Excluding the gain on sale in the prior-year period, revenues increased 4%, reflecting higher revenues in both
Banking
(increase of 5%) and
Markets and securities services
(increase of 3%).
Within
Banking
:
•
Investment banking
revenues declined 8%, due to a decline in market wallet across all major products as well as a particularly strong performance in the prior-year period. Advisory revenues increased 4%, reflecting gains in wallet share despite a decline in the overall market wallet. Equity underwriting revenues declined 7%, driven by the decline in market wallet. Debt underwriting revenues declined 13%, driven by the decline in market wallet as well as a decline in wallet share.
•
Treasury and trade solutions
revenues increased 8%, reflecting growth across both net interest and fee income, driven by continued growth in deposit and loan volumes, improved deposit spreads and strong fee growth across most cash products.
•
Corporate lending
revenues increased 27%. Excluding the impact of losses on loan hedges, revenues increased 17%, driven by the same factors described above. Average loans increased 10% versus the prior-year period.
•
Private bank
revenues increased 12%, driven by strong client activity across all regions. The increase in revenues reflected higher deposit spreads, an increase in loans, higher managed investments revenues and increased capital markets activity.
Within
Markets and securities services
:
•
Fixed income
markets
revenues decreased 2%, primarily due to lower revenues in
North America,
Asia
and
Latin America
. Rates and currencies revenues increased 1%, driven by higher G10 FX revenues that benefited from the return of volatility in the FX markets, as well as strong corporate and investor client activity. This increase was partially offset by lower G10 rates revenues due to lower client activity, as well as a comparison to a strong prior-year period, primarily in
EMEA
. Spread products and other fixed income revenues decreased 9%, primarily in
North America
, largely due to lower investor client activity, reflecting the more challenging market environment and a comparison to a strong prior-year period.
•
Equity markets
revenues increased 19%, reflecting strength in
Asia
,
North America
and
EMEA
, due to
growth in equity derivatives and prime finance, driven by a more favorable operating environment with higher
market volatility and increased investor and corporate client activity, as well as higher client balances.
•
Securities services
revenues increased 13%, driven by the same factors described above.
Expenses
increased 4%, driven by the same factors described above.
Provisions
increased $337 million to $55 million, primarily due to volume-related reserve builds for both funded loans and unfunded lending commitments, and a lower loan loss reserve release as compared to the prior-year period.
22
CORPORATE/OTHER
Corporate/Other
includes certain unallocated costs of global staff functions (including finance, risk, human resources, legal and compliance), other corporate expenses and unallocated global operations and technology expenses and income taxes, as well as Corporate Treasury, certain
North America
legacy consumer loan portfolios, other legacy assets and discontinued operations (for additional information on
Corporate/Other
, see “Citigroup Segments” above). At
September 30, 2018
,
Corporate/Other
had $94 billion in assets, down $6 billion year-over-year.
Third Quarter
Nine Months
% Change
In millions of dollars
2018
2017
% Change
2018
2017
Net interest revenue
$
554
$
516
7
%
$
1,645
$
1,571
5
%
Non-interest revenue
(60
)
3
NM
(32
)
810
NM
Total revenues, net of interest expense
$
494
$
519
(5
)%
$
1,613
$
2,381
(32
)%
Total operating expenses
$
459
$
827
(44
)%
$
1,799
$
2,957
(39
)%
Net credit losses
$
19
$
29
(34
)%
$
24
$
134
(82
)%
Credit reserve build (release)
(43
)
(79
)
46
(171
)
(268
)
36
Provision (release) for unfunded lending commitments
(5
)
—
—
(6
)
3
NM
Provision for benefits and claims
(1
)
—
NM
(2
)
1
NM
Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims
$
(30
)
$
(50
)
40
%
$
(155
)
$
(130
)
(19
)%
Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes
$
65
$
(258
)
NM
$
(31
)
$
(446
)
93
%
Income taxes (benefits)
116
(163
)
NM
109
(435
)
NM
Income (loss) from continuing operations
$
(51
)
$
(95
)
46
%
$
(140
)
$
(11
)
NM
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes
(8
)
(5
)
(60
)
—
(2
)
100
%
Net income (loss) before attribution of noncontrolling interests
$
(59
)
$
(100
)
41
%
$
(140
)
$
(13
)
NM
Noncontrolling interests
8
(17
)
NM
26
(13
)
NM
Net income (loss)
$
(67
)
$
(83
)
19
%
$
(166
)
$
—
—
%
NM Not meaningful
3Q18 vs. 3Q17
The
net loss
was $67 million, compared to a net loss of $83 million in the prior-year period. The lower net loss was largely driven by lower expenses, partially offset by higher taxes and a lower net loan loss reserve release.
Revenues
decreased 5%, driven by the continued wind-down of legacy assets.
Expenses
decreased 44%, primarily driven by the wind-down of legacy assets as well as lower infrastructure costs.
Provisions
increased $20 million to a net benefit of $30 million, as lower net credit losses were more than offset by a lower net loan loss reserve release. The decline in net credit losses reflected the impact of ongoing divestiture activity, including the impact of the continued wind-down in the legacy
North America
mortgage portfolio.
2018 YTD vs. 2017 YTD
The
net loss
was $166 million, compared to $0 net income in the prior-year period, reflecting lower revenues and higher taxes, partially offset by lower expenses and a higher net benefit from credit.
Revenues
decreased 32%, primarily driven by the same factors described above.
Expenses
decreased 39%, driven by the same factors described above, as well as lower legal costs.
Provisions
decreased $25 million to a net benefit of $155 million, driven by lower net credit losses, partially offset by a lower net loan loss reserve release. Net credit losses declined 82% to $24 million, driven by the same factors described above.
23
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
The table below shows where a discussion of Citi’s various off-balance sheet arrangements in this Form 10-Q may be found. For additional information, see “Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements” and Notes 1, 21 and 26 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Citigroup’s
2017
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Types of Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements Disclosures in this Form 10-Q
Variable interests and other obligations, including contingent obligations, arising from variable interests in nonconsolidated VIEs
See Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Letters of credit, and lending and other commitments
See Note 22 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Guarantees
See Note 22 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
24
CAPITAL RESOURCES
Overview
Capital is used principally to support assets in Citi’s businesses and to absorb credit, market and operational losses. Citi primarily generates capital through earnings from its operating businesses. Citi may augment its capital through issuances of common stock, noncumulative perpetual preferred stock and equity issued through awards under employee benefit plans, among other issuances.
Further, Citi’s capital levels may also be affected by changes in accounting and regulatory standards, as well as U.S. corporate tax laws and the impact of future events on Citi’s business results, such as changes in interest and foreign exchange rates, as well as business and asset dispositions.
During the
third
quarter of
2018
, Citi returned a total of $6.4 billion of capital to common shareholders in the form of share repurchases (approximately 75 million common shares) and dividends.
Capital Management
Citi’s capital management framework is designed to ensure that Citigroup and its principal subsidiaries maintain sufficient capital consistent with each entity’s respective risk profile, management targets and all applicable regulatory standards and guidelines. Based on Citigroup’s current regulatory capital requirements, as well as consideration of potential future changes to the U.S. Basel III rules, management currently believes that a targeted Common Equity Tier 1 Capital ratio of approximately 11.5% represents the amount necessary to prudently operate and invest in Citi’s franchise, including when considering future growth plans, capital return projections and other factors that may impact Citi’s businesses. However, management may revise Citigroup’s targeted Common Equity Tier 1 Capital ratio in response to changing regulatory capital requirements as well as other relevant factors. For additional information regarding Citi’s capital management, see “Capital Resources—Capital Management” in Citigroup’s
2017
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Stress Testing Component of Capital Planning
Citi is subject to an annual assessment by the Federal Reserve Board as to whether Citigroup has effective capital planning processes as well as sufficient regulatory capital to absorb losses during stressful economic and financial conditions, while also meeting obligations to creditors and counterparties and continuing to serve as a credit intermediary. This annual assessment includes two related programs: the Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR) and Dodd-Frank Act Stress Testing (DFAST). For additional information regarding the stress testing component of capital planning, see “Forward-Looking Statements” below and “Capital Resources—Current Regulatory Capital Standards—Stress Testing Component of Capital Planning” and “Risk Factors—Strategic Risks”
in Citigroup’s
2017
Annual Report on Form 10-K. For additional information regarding a recent proposed rulemaking and other potential changes in Citi’s regulatory capital requirements and future CCAR processes, see “Regulatory Capital Standards Developments” in the First Quarter of 2018 Form 10-Q.
Current Regulatory Capital Standards
Citi is subject to regulatory capital standards issued by the Federal Reserve Board, which constitute the U.S. Basel III rules. These rules establish an integrated capital adequacy framework, encompassing both risk-based capital ratios and leverage ratios. For additional information regarding the risk-based capital ratios, Tier 1 Leverage ratio and Supplementary Leverage ratio, see “Capital Resources—Current Regulatory Capital Standards” in Citigroup’s
2017
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
GSIB Surcharge
The Federal Reserve Board also adopted a rule that imposes a risk-based capital surcharge upon U.S. GSIBs, including Citi. Citi’s GSIB surcharge effective for 2018 remains unchanged from 2017 at 3.0%. For additional information regarding the identification of a GSIB and the methodology for annually determining the GSIB surcharge, see “Capital Resources—Current Regulatory Capital Standards—GSIB Surcharge” in Citigroup’s
2017
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Transition Provisions
The U.S. Basel III rules contain several differing, largely multi-year transition provisions (i.e., “phase-ins” and “phase-outs”). Moreover, the GSIB surcharge, Capital Conservation Buffer, and any Countercyclical Capital Buffer (currently 0%), commenced phase-in on January 1, 2016, becoming fully effective on January 1, 2019. With the exception of the non-grandfathered trust preferred securities, which do not fully phase-out until January 1, 2022, and the capital buffers and GSIB surcharge, which do not fully phase-in until January 1, 2019, all other transition provisions are entirely reflected in Citi’s regulatory capital ratios beginning January 1, 2018. Accordingly, commencing with the first quarter of 2018, Citi is presenting a single set of regulatory capital components and ratios, reflecting current regulatory capital standards in effect throughout 2018. Citi previously disclosed its Basel III risk-based capital and leverage ratios and related components reflecting Basel III Transition Arrangements with respect to regulatory capital adjustments and deductions, as well as Full Implementation, in Citi’s 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K and Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q; however, beginning January 1, 2018, that distinction is no longer relevant.
For additional information regarding the transition provisions under the U.S. Basel III rules, including with respect to the GSIB surcharge, see “Capital Resources—
25
Current Regulatory Capital Standards—Transition Provisions” in Citigroup’s
2017
Annual Report on Form 10-K. For information regarding Citigroup’s capital resources reflecting Basel III Transition Arrangements as of December 31, 2017, see “Capital Resources—Current Regulatory Capital Standards—Citigroup’s Capital Resources Under Current Regulatory Standards” in Citigroup’s
2017
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Citigroup’s Capital Resources
Citi is required to maintain stated minimum Common Equity Tier 1 Capital, Tier 1 Capital and Total Capital ratios of 4.5%, 6.0% and 8.0%, respectively.
Citi’s effective minimum Common Equity Tier 1 Capital, Tier 1 Capital and Total Capital ratios during 2018, inclusive of the 75% phase-in of both the 2.5% Capital Conservation Buffer and the 3.0% GSIB surcharge (all of which is to be composed of Common Equity Tier 1 Capital), are 8.625%, 10.125% and 12.125%, respectively. Citi’s effective minimum Common Equity Tier 1 Capital, Tier 1 Capital and Total Capital ratios during 2017, inclusive of the 50% phase-in of both the 2.5% Capital Conservation Buffer and the 3.0% GSIB surcharge (all of which is to be composed of Common Equity Tier 1 Capital), were 7.25%, 8.75% and 10.75%, respectively.
Citi currently estimates that its effective minimum Common Equity Tier 1 Capital, Tier 1 Capital and Total Capital ratio requirements during 2019, inclusive of the 2.5% Capital Conservation Buffer and the Countercyclical Capital Buffer at its current level of 0%, as well as a 3.0% GSIB surcharge, may be 10.0%, 11.5% and 13.5%, respectively.
Furthermore, to be “well capitalized” under current federal bank regulatory agency definitions, a bank holding
company must have a Tier 1 Capital ratio of at least 6.0%, a Total Capital ratio of at least 10.0%, and not be subject to a Federal Reserve Board directive to maintain higher capital levels.
Under the U.S. Basel III rules, Citi must comply with a 4.0% minimum Tier 1 Leverage ratio requirement. Effective January 1, 2018, Citi must also comply with an effective 5.0% minimum Supplementary Leverage ratio requirement.
The following tables set forth the capital tiers, total risk-weighted assets and underlying risk components, risk-based capital ratios, quarterly adjusted average total assets, Total Leverage Exposure and leverage ratios for Citi as of
September 30, 2018
and
December 31, 2017
.
Citigroup Capital Components and Ratios
September 30, 2018
December 31, 2017
In millions of dollars, except ratios
Advanced Approaches
Standardized Approach
Advanced Approaches
Standardized Approach
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital
$
140,428
$
140,428
$
142,822
$
142,822
Tier 1 Capital
159,877
159,877
162,377
162,377
Total Capital (Tier 1 Capital + Tier 2 Capital)
184,623
196,808
187,877
199,989
Total Risk-Weighted Assets
1,155,188
1,196,923
1,152,644
1,155,099
Credit Risk
$
769,942
$
1,126,869
$
767,102
$
1,089,372
Market Risk
68,647
70,054
65,003
65,727
Operational Risk
316,599
—
320,539
—
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital ratio
(1)(2)
12.16
%
11.73
%
12.39
%
12.36
%
Tier 1 Capital ratio
(1)(2)
13.84
13.36
14.09
14.06
Total Capital ratio
(1)(2)
15.98
16.44
16.30
17.31
In millions of dollars, except ratios
September 30, 2018
December 31, 2017
Quarterly Adjusted Average Total Assets
(3)
$
1,882,493
$
1,868,326
Total Leverage Exposure
(4)
2,459,993
2,432,491
Tier 1 Leverage ratio
(2)
8.49
%
8.69
%
Supplementary Leverage ratio
(2)
6.50
6.68
(1)
As of
September 30, 2018
and
December 31, 2017
, Citi’s reportable Common Equity Tier 1 Capital and Tier 1 Capital ratios were the lower derived under the Basel III Standardized Approach, whereas the reportable Total Capital ratio was the lower derived under the Basel III Advanced Approaches framework.
(2)
Citi’s risk-based capital and leverage ratios and related components as of
December 31, 2017
are non-GAAP financial measures, which reflect full implementation of regulatory capital adjustments and deductions prior to the effective date of January 1, 2018.
(3)
Tier 1 Leverage ratio denominator.
(4)
Supplementary Leverage ratio denominator.
26
As indicated in the table above, Citigroup’s risk-based capital ratios at
September 30, 2018
were in excess of the stated and effective minimum requirements under the U.S. Basel III rules. In addition, Citi was also “well capitalized” under current federal bank regulatory agency definitions as of
September 30, 2018
.
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital Ratio
Citi’s Common Equity Tier 1 Capital ratio was 11.7% at
September 30, 2018
, compared to 12.1% at June 30, 2018 and 12.4% at
December 31, 2017
. The ratio decreased from the second quarter of 2018 primarily due to the return of $6.4 billion of capital to common shareholders, increases in credit and market risk-weighted assets, and adverse net movements in
Accumulated other comprehensive income
(AOCI), partially offset by quarterly net income of $4.6 billion. Citi’s Common Equity Tier 1 Capital ratio declined from year-end 2017 primarily due to the return of $12.6 billion of capital to common shareholders, increases in credit and market risk-weighted assets, and adverse net movements in AOCI, partially offset by year-to-date net income of $13.7 billion.
27
Components of Citigroup Capital
In millions of dollars
September 30,
2018
December 31, 2017
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital
Citigroup common stockholders’ equity
(1)
$
178,153
$
181,671
Add: Qualifying noncontrolling interests
148
153
Regulatory Capital Adjustments and Deductions:
Less: Accumulated net unrealized losses on cash flow hedges, net of tax
(2)
(1,095
)
(698
)
Less: Cumulative unrealized net loss related to changes in fair value of
financial liabilities attributable to own creditworthiness, net of tax
(3)
(503
)
(721
)
Less: Intangible assets:
Goodwill, net of related DTLs
(4)
21,891
22,052
Identifiable intangible assets other than MSRs, net of related DTLs
4,304
4,401
Less: Defined benefit pension plan net assets
931
896
Less: DTAs arising from net operating loss, foreign tax credit and general
business credit carry-forwards
(5)
12,345
13,072
Total Common Equity Tier 1 Capital (Standardized Approach and Advanced Approaches)
$
140,428
$
142,822
Additional Tier 1 Capital
Qualifying noncumulative perpetual preferred stock
(1)
$
18,851
$
19,069
Qualifying trust preferred securities
(6)
1,382
1,377
Qualifying noncontrolling interests
56
61
Regulatory Capital Deductions:
Less: Permitted ownership interests in covered funds
(7)
795
900
Less: Minimum regulatory capital requirements of insurance underwriting subsidiaries
(8)
45
52
Total Additional Tier 1 Capital (Standardized Approach and Advanced Approaches)
$
19,449
$
19,555
Total Tier 1 Capital (Common Equity Tier 1 Capital + Additional Tier 1 Capital)
(Standardized Approach and Advanced Approaches)
$
159,877
$
162,377
Tier 2 Capital
Qualifying subordinated debt
$
22,948
$
23,673
Qualifying trust preferred securities
(9)
324
329
Qualifying noncontrolling interests
48
50
Eligible allowance for credit losses
(10)
13,656
13,612
Regulatory Capital Deduction:
Less: Minimum regulatory capital requirements of insurance underwriting subsidiaries
(8)
45
52
Total Tier 2 Capital (Standardized Approach)
$
36,931
$
37,612
Total Capital (Tier 1 Capital + Tier 2 Capital) (Standardized Approach)
$
196,808
$
199,989
Adjustment for excess of eligible credit reserves over expected credit losses
(10)
$
(12,185
)
$
(12,112
)
Total Tier 2 Capital (Advanced Approaches)
$
24,746
$
25,500
Total Capital (Tier 1 Capital + Tier 2 Capital) (Advanced Approaches)
$
184,623
$
187,877
(1)
Issuance costs of $184 million related to noncumulative perpetual preferred stock outstanding at
September 30, 2018
and
December 31, 2017
are excluded from common stockholders’ equity and netted against such preferred stock in accordance with Federal Reserve Board regulatory reporting requirements, which differ from those under U.S. GAAP.
(2)
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital is adjusted for accumulated net unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges included in AOCI that relate to the hedging of items not recognized at fair value on the balance sheet.
(3)
The cumulative impact of changes in Citigroup’s own creditworthiness in valuing liabilities for which the fair value option has been elected, and own-credit valuation adjustments on derivatives, are excluded from Common Equity Tier 1 Capital, in accordance with the U.S. Basel III rules.
(4)
Includes goodwill “embedded” in the valuation of significant common stock investments in unconsolidated financial institutions.
Footnotes continue on the following page.
28
(5)
Of Citi’s $23.0 billion of net DTAs at
September 30, 2018
, $11.4 billion were includable in Common Equity Tier 1 Capital pursuant to the U.S. Basel III rules, while $11.6 billion were excluded. Excluded from Citi’s Common Equity Tier 1 Capital as of
September 30, 2018
was $12.3 billion of net DTAs arising from net operating loss, foreign tax credit and general business credit carry-forwards, which was reduced by $0.7 billion of net DTLs primarily associated with goodwill and certain other intangible assets. Separately, under the U.S. Basel III rules, goodwill and these other intangible assets are deducted net of associated DTLs in arriving at Common Equity Tier 1 Capital. DTAs arising from net operating loss, foreign tax credit and general business credit carry-forwards are required to be entirely deducted from Common Equity Tier 1 Capital under the U.S. Basel III rules. Commencing on December 31, 2017, Citi’s DTAs arising from temporary differences were less than the 10% limitation under the U.S. Basel III rules and therefore not subject to deduction from Common Equity Tier 1 Capital, but are subject to risk-weighting at 250%.
(6)
Represents Citigroup Capital XIII trust preferred securities, which are permanently grandfathered as Tier 1 Capital under the U.S. Basel III rules.
(7)
Banking entities are required to be in compliance with the Volcker Rule of the Dodd-Frank Act, which prohibits conducting certain proprietary investment activities and limits their ownership of, and relationships with, covered funds. Accordingly, Citi is required by the Volcker Rule to deduct from Tier 1 Capital all permitted ownership interests in covered funds that were acquired after December 31, 2013.
(8)
50% of the minimum regulatory capital requirements of insurance underwriting subsidiaries must be deducted from each of Tier 1 Capital and Tier 2 Capital.
(9)
Represents the amount of non-grandfathered trust preferred securities eligible for inclusion in Tier 2 Capital under the U.S. Basel III rules, which will be fully phased-out of Tier 2 Capital by January 1, 2022.
(10)
Under the Standardized Approach, the allowance for credit losses is eligible for inclusion in Tier 2 Capital up to 1.25% of credit risk-weighted assets, with any excess allowance for credit losses being deducted in arriving at credit risk-weighted assets, which differs from the Advanced Approaches framework, in which eligible credit reserves that exceed expected credit losses are eligible for inclusion in Tier 2 Capital to the extent the excess reserves do not exceed 0.6% of credit risk-weighted assets. The total amount of eligible credit reserves in excess of expected credit losses that were eligible for inclusion in Tier 2 Capital, subject to limitation, under the Advanced Approaches framework was $1.5 billion at both
September 30, 2018
and
December 31, 2017
.
29
Citigroup Capital Rollforward
In millions of dollars
Three Months Ended
September 30, 2018
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2018
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital, beginning of period
$
142,868
$
142,822
Net income
4,622
13,732
Common and preferred stock dividends declared
(1,397
)
(3,637
)
Net increase in treasury stock
(5,265
)
(9,369
)
Net change in common stock and additional paid-in capital
98
(184
)
Net increase in foreign currency translation losses net of hedges, net of tax
(221
)
(1,968
)
Net increase in unrealized losses on debt securities AFS, net of tax
(605
)
(2,164
)
Net decrease in defined benefit plans liability adjustment, net of tax
26
415
Net change in adjustment related to changes in fair value of financial liabilities
attributable to own creditworthiness, net of tax
54
(59
)
Net change in ASC 815—excluded component of fair value hedges
10
(22
)
Net change in goodwill, net of related DTLs
(82
)
161
Net decrease in identifiable intangible assets other than MSRs, net of related DTLs
157
97
Net increase in defined benefit pension plan net assets
(49
)
(35
)
Net decrease in DTAs arising from net operating loss, foreign tax credit and
general business credit carry-forwards
206
727
Other
6
(88
)
Net decrease in Common Equity Tier 1 Capital
$
(2,440
)
$
(2,394
)
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital, end of period
(Standardized Approach and Advanced Approaches)
$
140,428
$
140,428
Additional Tier 1 Capital, beginning of period
$
19,134
$
19,555
Net decrease in qualifying perpetual preferred stock
—
(218
)
Net increase in qualifying trust preferred securities
2
5
Net decrease in permitted ownership interests in covered funds
314
105
Other
(1
)
2
Net change in Additional Tier 1 Capital
$
315
$
(106
)
Tier 1 Capital, end of period
(Standardized Approach and Advanced Approaches)
$
159,877
$
159,877
Tier 2 Capital, beginning of period (Standardized Approach)
$
36,962
$
37,612
Net decrease in qualifying subordinated debt
(286
)
(725
)
Net increase in eligible allowance for credit losses
253
44
Other
2
—
Net decrease in Tier 2 Capital (Standardized Approach)
$
(31
)
$
(681
)
Tier 2 Capital, end of period (Standardized Approach)
$
36,931
$
36,931
Total Capital, end of period (Standardized Approach)
$
196,808
$
196,808
Tier 2 Capital, beginning of period (Advanced Approaches)
$
25,238
$
25,500
Net decrease in qualifying subordinated debt
(286
)
(725
)
Net decrease in excess of eligible credit reserves over expected credit losses
(208
)
(29
)
Other
2
—
Net decrease in Tier 2 Capital (Advanced Approaches)
$
(492
)
$
(754
)
Tier 2 Capital, end of period (Advanced Approaches)
$
24,746
$
24,746
Total Capital, end of period (Advanced Approaches)
$
184,623
$
184,623
30
Citigroup Risk-Weighted Assets Rollforward (Basel III Standardized Approach)
In millions of dollars
Three Months Ended
September 30, 2018
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2018
Total Risk-Weighted Assets, beginning of period
$
1,176,863
$
1,155,099
Changes in Credit Risk-Weighted Assets
Net increase in general credit risk exposures
(1)
2,730
2,715
Net increase in repo-style transactions
(2)
3,761
5,621
Net decrease in securitization exposures
(1,078
)
(232
)
Net increase in equity exposures
1,139
2,679
Net increase in over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives
(3)
7,489
18,213
Net change in other exposures
(4)
(321
)
1,999
Net increase in off-balance sheet exposures
(5)
266
6,502
Net increase in Credit Risk-Weighted Assets
$
13,986
$
37,497
Changes in Market Risk-Weighted Assets
Net increase in risk levels
(6)
$
5,673
$
11,603
Net change due to model and methodology updates
(7)
401
(7,276
)
Net increase in Market Risk-Weighted Assets
$
6,074
$
4,327
Total Risk-Weighted Assets, end of period
$
1,196,923
$
1,196,923
(1)
General credit risk exposures include cash and balances due from depository institutions, securities, and loans and leases. General credit risk exposures
increased during the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2018
, driven by growth in corporate loans.
(2)
Repo-style transactions include repurchase and reverse repurchase transactions as well as securities borrowing and securities lending transactions.
(3)
OTC derivatives increased during the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2018
, primarily due to increased notional amounts for bilateral trades.
(4)
Other exposures include cleared transactions, unsettled transactions and other assets. Other exposures increased during the nine months ended
September 30, 2018
, primarily due to additional DTAs arising from temporary differences, which are subject to risk-weighting at 250%.
(5)
Off-balance sheet exposures increased during the nine months ended
September 30, 2018
, primarily due to an increase in commitments to extend credit that will drive future corporate loan growth.
(6)
Risk levels increased during the three months ended
September 30, 2018
primarily due to an increase in positions subject to specific risk charges, partially offset by decreases in exposure levels subject to Stressed Value at Risk. Risk levels increased during the nine months ended
September 30, 2018
primarily due to an increase in positions subject to specific risk charges.
(7)
Risk-weighted assets decreased during the nine months ended
September 30, 2018
due to changes in model inputs regarding volatility and the correlation between market risk factors, as well as methodology changes for standard specific risk charges.
31
Citigroup Risk-Weighted Assets Rollforward (Basel III Advanced Approaches)
In millions of dollars
Three Months Ended
September 30, 2018
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2018
Total Risk-Weighted Assets, beginning of period
$
1,147,865
$
1,152,644
Changes in Credit Risk-Weighted Assets
Net change in retail exposures
(1)
2,293
(14,218
)
Net change in wholesale exposures
(2)
(2,519
)
5,756
Net increase in repo-style transactions
(3)
98
1,394
Net change in securitization exposures
(637
)
387
Net increase in equity exposures
1,320
2,878
Net change in over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives
(4)
(189
)
1,754
Net change in derivatives CVA
(5)
(1,415
)
1,783
Net increase in other exposures
(6)
1,594
3,046
Net increase in supervisory 6% multiplier
(7)
118
60
Net increase in Credit Risk-Weighted Assets
$
663
$
2,840
Changes in Market Risk-Weighted Assets
Net increase in risk levels
(8)
$
5,159
$
10,920
Net change due to model and methodology updates
(9)
401
(7,276
)
Net increase in Market Risk-Weighted Assets
$
5,560
$
3,644
Net change in Operational Risk-Weighted Assets
(10)
$
1,100
$
(3,940
)
Total Risk-Weighted Assets, end of period
$
1,155,188
$
1,155,188
(1)
Retail exposures increased during the three months ended
September 30, 2018
, primarily due to new accounts and spending for qualifying revolving (cards) exposures. Retail exposures decreased during the nine months ended
September 30, 2018
, primarily due to net reductions in qualifying revolving (cards) exposures attributable to seasonal holiday spending repayments, as well as residential mortgage loan sales and repayments.
(2)
Wholesale exposures decreased during the three months ended September 30, 2018 primarily due to decreases in commercial loans. Wholesale exposures increased during the nine months ended
September 30, 2018
, primarily due to increases in commercial loans and loan commitments.
(3)
Repo-style transactions include repurchase and reverse repurchase transactions as well as securities borrowing and securities lending transactions.
(4)
OTC derivatives increased during the nine months ended
September 30, 2018
, primarily due to increases in potential future exposure and fair value.
(5)
Derivatives CVA decreased during the three months ended
September 30, 2018
, primarily due to decreases in exposures. Derivatives CVA increased during the nine months ended
September 30, 2018
, primarily due to increased exposures and changes in credit spreads.
(6)
Other exposures include cleared transactions, unsettled transactions, assets other than those reportable in specific exposure categories and non-material portfolios. Other exposures increased during the three months ended
September 30, 2018
, primarily due to an increase in other assets. Other exposures increased during the nine months ended
September 30, 2018
, primarily due to an increase in other assets and additional DTAs arising from temporary differences, which are subject to risk-weighting at 250%.
(7)
Supervisory 6% multiplier does not apply to derivatives CVA.
(8)
Risk levels increased during the three months ended
September 30, 2018
primarily due to an increase in positions subject to specific risk charges, partially offset by decreases in exposure levels subject to Stressed Value at Risk. Risk levels increased during the nine months ended
September 30, 2018
primarily due to an increase in positions subject to specific risk charges.
(9)
Risk-weighted assets decreased during the nine months ended
September 30, 2018
due to changes in model inputs regarding volatility and the correlation between market risk factors, as well as methodology changes for standard specific risk charges.
(10)
Operational risk-weighted assets increased during the three months ended September 30, 2018, and decreased during the nine months ended
September 30, 2018
, primarily due to changes in operational loss severity and frequency.
As set forth in the table above, total risk-weighted assets under the Basel III Standardized Approach increased from year-end 2017 due to higher credit and market risk-weighted assets. The increase in credit risk-weighted assets was primarily due to increased OTC derivatives, corporate loan commitments and an increase in repo-style transactions.
Total risk-weighted assets under the Basel III Advanced Approaches increased from year-end 2017, as higher credit and market risk-weighted assets were partially offset by a decrease in operational risk-weighted assets. The increase in credit risk-weighted assets was primarily due to increases in commercial loans and loan commitments, increases in equity exposures, and additional temporary difference DTAs subject to risk weighting, partially offset
by a decline in retail exposures due to reductions in qualifying revolving (cards) exposures attributable to seasonal holiday spending repayments as well as residential mortgage loan sales and repayments. The decline in operational risk-weighted assets was primarily due to changes in operational loss severity and frequency.
Market risk-weighted assets increased under both the Basel III Standardized Approach and Basel III Advanced Approaches primarily due to increases in positions subject to specific risk charges, partially offset by changes in model inputs regarding volatility and the correlation between market risk factors, as well as methodology changes for standard specific risk charges.
32
Supplementary Leverage Ratio
As set forth in the table below, Citigroup’s Supplementary Leverage ratio was 6.5% for the
third
quarter of
2018
, compared to 6.6% for the second quarter of 2018 and 6.7% for the fourth quarter of 2017. The decline in the ratio quarter-over-quarter was principally driven by the return of $6.4 billion of capital to common shareholders as well as adverse net movements in AOCI, partially offset by quarterly net income of $4.6 billion. The ratio decreased from the fourth quarter of 2017, principally driven by the return of capital to common shareholders, adverse net
movements in AOCI and an increase in Total Leverage Exposure (TLE) primarily due to growth in average on-balance sheet assets and off-balance sheet commitments, partially offset by year-to-date net income.
The following table sets forth Citi’s Supplementary Leverage ratio and related components for the
three months ended
September 30, 2018
and
December 31, 2017
.
Citigroup Basel III Supplementary Leverage Ratio and Related Components
In millions of dollars, except ratios
September 30, 2018
December 31, 2017
Tier 1 Capital
$
159,877
$
162,377
Total Leverage Exposure (TLE)
On-balance sheet assets
(1)
$
1,922,804
$
1,909,699
Certain off-balance sheet exposures:
(2)
Potential future exposure on derivative contracts
191,557
191,555
Effective notional of sold credit derivatives, net
(3)
48,047
59,207
Counterparty credit risk for repo-style transactions
(4)
22,732
27,005
Unconditionally cancellable commitments
69,794
67,644
Other off-balance sheet exposures
245,370
218,754
Total of certain off-balance sheet exposures
$
577,500
$
564,165
Less: Tier 1 Capital deductions
40,311
41,373
Total Leverage Exposure
$
2,459,993
$
2,432,491
Supplementary Leverage ratio
6.50
%
6.68
%
(1)
Represents the daily average of on-balance sheet assets for the quarter.
(2)
Represents the average of certain off-balance sheet exposures calculated as of the last day of each month in the quarter.
(3)
Under the U.S. Basel III rules, banking organizations are required to include in TLE the effective notional amount of sold credit derivatives, with netting of exposures permitted if certain conditions are met.
(4)
Repo-style transactions include repurchase and reverse repurchase transactions as well as securities borrowing and securities lending transactions.
33
Capital Resources of Citigroup’s Subsidiary U.S. Depository Institutions
Citigroup’s subsidiary U.S. depository institutions are also subject to regulatory capital standards issued by their respective primary federal bank regulatory agencies, which are similar to the standards of the Federal Reserve Board.
During 2018, Citi’s primary subsidiary U.S. depository institution, Citibank, N.A. (Citibank), is subject to effective minimum Common Equity Tier 1 Capital, Tier 1 Capital and Total Capital ratios, inclusive of the 75% phase-in of the 2.5% Capital Conservation Buffer, of 6.375%, 7.875% and 9.875%, respectively. Citibank’s effective minimum Common Equity Tier 1 Capital, Tier 1 Capital and Total Capital ratios during 2017, inclusive of the 50% phase-in of
the 2.5% Capital Conservation Buffer, were 5.75%, 7.25% and 9.25%, respectively. Citibank is required to maintain stated minimum Common Equity Tier 1 Capital, Tier 1 Capital and Total Capital ratios of 4.5%, 6.0% and 8.0%, respectively.
The following tables set forth the capital tiers, total risk-weighted assets and underlying risk components, risk-based capital ratios, quarterly adjusted average total assets, Total Leverage Exposure and leverage ratios for Citibank, Citi’s primary subsidiary U.S. depository institution, as of
September 30, 2018
and
December 31, 2017
.
Citibank Capital Components and Ratios
September 30, 2018
December 31, 2017
In millions of dollars, except ratios
Advanced Approaches
Standardized Approach
Advanced Approaches
Standardized Approach
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital
$
128,097
$
128,097
$
122,848
$
122,848
Tier 1 Capital
130,222
130,222
124,952
124,952
Total Capital (Tier 1 Capital + Tier 2 Capital)
(1)
143,471
154,081
138,008
148,946
Total Risk-Weighted Assets
946,235
1,043,721
965,435
1,024,502
Credit Risk
$
667,549
$
1,007,205
$
674,659
$
980,324
Market Risk
36,141
36,516
43,300
44,178
Operational Risk
242,545
—
247,476
—
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital ratio
(2)(3)(4)
13.54
%
12.27
%
12.72
%
11.99
%
Tier 1 Capital ratio
(2)(3)(4)
13.76
12.48
12.94
12.20
Total Capital ratio
(2)(3)(4)
15.16
14.76
14.29
14.54
In millions of dollars, except ratios
September 30, 2018
December 31, 2017
Quarterly Adjusted Average Total Assets
(5)
$
1,396,471
$
1,401,187
Total Leverage Exposure
(6)
1,920,675
1,900,641
Tier 1 Leverage ratio
(2)(4)
9.33
%
8.92
%
Supplementary Leverage ratio
(2)(4)
6.78
6.57
(1)
Under the Advanced Approaches framework, eligible credit reserves that exceed expected credit losses are eligible for inclusion in Tier 2 Capital to the extent that the excess reserves do not exceed 0.6% of credit risk-weighted assets, which differs from the Standardized Approach in which the allowance for credit losses is eligible for inclusion in Tier 2 Capital up to 1.25% of credit risk-weighted assets, with any excess allowance for credit losses being deducted in arriving at credit risk-weighted assets.
(2)
Citibank’s risk-based capital and leverage ratios and related components as of
December 31, 2017
are non-GAAP financial measures, which reflect full implementation of regulatory capital adjustments and deductions prior to the effective date of January 1, 2018.
(3)
As of
September 30, 2018
, Citibank’s reportable Common Equity Tier 1 Capital, Tier 1 Capital and Total Capital ratios were the lower derived under the Basel III Standardized Approach. As of
December 31, 2017
, Citibank’s reportable Common Equity Tier 1 Capital and Tier 1 Capital ratios were the lower derived under the Basel III Standardized Approach, whereas the reportable Total Capital ratio was the lower derived under the Basel III Advanced Approaches framework.
(4)
Citibank must maintain minimum Common Equity Tier 1 Capital, Tier 1 Capital, Total Capital and Tier 1 Leverage ratios of 6.5%, 8.0%, 10.0% and 5.0%, respectively, to be considered “well capitalized” under the revised Prompt Corrective Action (PCA) regulations applicable to insured depository institutions as established by the U.S. Basel III rules. Effective January 1, 2018, Citibank must also maintain a minimum Supplementary Leverage ratio of 6.0% to be considered “well capitalized.” For additional information, see “Capital Resources—Current Regulatory Capital Standards—Prompt Corrective Action Framework” in Citigroup’s 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(5)
Tier 1 Leverage ratio denominator.
(6)
Supplementary Leverage ratio denominator.
As indicated in the table above, Citibank’s capital ratios at
September 30, 2018
were in excess of the stated and effective minimum requirements under the U.S.
Basel III rules. In addition, Citibank was also “well capitalized” as of
September 30, 2018
under the revised PCA regulations.
34
Impact of Changes on Citigroup and Citibank Capital Ratios
The following tables present the estimated sensitivity of Citigroup’s and Citibank’s capital ratios to changes of $100 million in Common Equity Tier 1 Capital, Tier 1 Capital and Total Capital (numerator), and changes of $1 billion in
Advanced Approaches and Standardized Approach risk-weighted assets and quarterly adjusted average total assets, as well as Total Leverage Exposure (denominator), as of
September 30, 2018
. This information is provided for the
purpose of analyzing the impact that a change in Citigroup’s or Citibank’s financial position or results of operations could have on these ratios. These sensitivities only consider a single change to either a component of capital, risk-weighted assets, quarterly adjusted average total assets or Total Leverage Exposure. Accordingly, an event that affects more than one factor may have a larger basis point impact than is reflected in these tables.
Impact of Changes on Citigroup and Citibank Risk-Based Capital Ratios
Common Equity
Tier 1 Capital ratio
Tier 1 Capital ratio
Total Capital ratio
In basis points
Impact of
$100 million
change in
Common Equity
Tier 1 Capital
Impact of
$1 billion
change in risk-
weighted assets
Impact of
$100 million
change in
Tier 1 Capital
Impact of
$1 billion
change in risk-
weighted assets
Impact of
$100 million
change in
Total Capital
Impact of
$1 billion
change in risk-
weighted assets
Citigroup
Advanced Approaches
0.9
1.1
0.9
1.2
0.9
1.4
Standardized Approach
0.8
1.0
0.8
1.1
0.8
1.4
Citibank
Advanced Approaches
1.1
1.4
1.1
1.5
1.1
1.6
Standardized Approach
1.0
1.2
1.0
1.2
1.0
1.4
Impact of Changes on Citigroup and Citibank Leverage Ratios
Tier 1 Leverage ratio
Supplementary Leverage ratio
In basis points
Impact of
$100 million
change in
Tier 1 Capital
Impact of
$1 billion
change in quarterly adjusted average total assets
Impact of
$100 million
change in
Tier 1 Capital
Impact of
$1 billion
change in Total Leverage Exposure
Citigroup
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.3
Citibank
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.4
Citigroup Broker-Dealer Subsidiaries
At
September 30, 2018
, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., a U.S. broker-dealer registered with the SEC that is an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Citigroup, had net capital, computed in accordance with the SEC’s net capital rule, of $10.5 billion, which exceeded the minimum requirement by $8.1 billion.
Moreover, Citigroup Global Markets Limited, a broker-dealer registered with the United Kingdom’s Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) that is also an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Citigroup, had total capital of $20.9 billion at
September 30, 2018
, which exceeded the PRA's minimum regulatory capital requirements.
In addition, certain of Citi’s other broker-dealer subsidiaries are subject to regulation in the countries in which they do business, including requirements to maintain specified levels of net capital or its equivalent. Citigroup’s other broker-dealer subsidiaries were in compliance with their regulatory capital requirements at
September 30, 2018
.
35
Regulatory Capital Standards Developments
Leverage Ratio Treatment of Client Cleared Derivatives
In October 2018, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (Basel Committee) issued a consultative document seeking views as to whether a targeted and limited revision of the leverage ratio exposure measure is warranted with regard to the treatment of client cleared derivatives. In the U.S., the Basel Committee’s leverage ratio framework and leverage ratio exposure measure are most closely aligned with the Supplementary Leverage Ratio and Total Leverage Exposure, respectively. Under the Basel Committee’s leverage ratio framework, which was last updated in December 2017, the leverage ratio exposure measure is generally not adjusted for physical or financial collateral, guarantees or other credit risk mitigation techniques. However, the Basel Committee consultative document proposes two alternative treatments for client cleared derivatives that would reduce the leverage ratio exposure measure, to varying degrees, in recognition of the beneficial effects of margin requirements and overcollateralization, as applicable.
One of the options under consideration would allow amounts of cash and non-cash initial margin that are received from the client to offset the potential future exposure of derivatives centrally cleared on the client’s behalf. Another option would amend the currently specified treatment of client cleared derivatives to align it with the measurement as determined per the Basel Committee’s standardized approach for measuring counterparty credit risk exposures, as used for risk-based capital requirements. This option would permit both cash and non-cash forms of initial margin and variation margin received from the client to offset replacement cost and potential future exposure for client cleared derivatives only.
The U.S. banking agencies may revise the treatment of client cleared derivatives under the Supplementary Leverage Ratio in the future, based upon any revisions adopted by the Basel Committee.
36
Tangible Common Equity, Book Value Per Share, Tangible Book Value Per Share and Returns on Equity
Tangible common equity (TCE), as defined by Citi, represents common stockholders’ equity less goodwill and identifiable intangible assets (other than MSRs). Other companies may calculate TCE in a different manner. TCE, tangible book value per share and returns on average TCE are non-GAAP financial measures.
In millions of dollars or shares, except per share amounts
September 30,
2018
December 31,
2017
Total Citigroup stockholders’ equity
$
197,004
$
200,740
Less: Preferred stock
19,035
19,253
Common stockholders’ equity
$
177,969
$
181,487
Less:
Goodwill
22,187
22,256
Identifiable intangible assets (other than MSRs)
4,598
4,588
Goodwill and identifiable intangible assets (other than MSRs) related to
assets held-for-sale (HFS)
—
32
Tangible common equity (TCE)
$
151,184
$
154,611
Common shares outstanding (CSO)
2,442.1
2,569.9
Book value per share (common equity/CSO)
$
72.88
$
70.62
Tangible book value per share (TCE/CSO)
61.91
60.16
In millions of dollars
Three Months Ended September 30, 2018
Three Months Ended September 30, 2017
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017
Net income available to common shareholders
$
4,352
$
3,861
$
12,872
$
11,202
Average common stockholders’ equity
(1)
$
179,459
$
209,764
$
180,772
$
208,787
Average TCE
$
152,712
$
182,333
$
153,909
$
181,271
Return on average common stockholders’ equity
9.6
%
7.3
%
9.5
%
7.2
%
Return on average TCE (ROTCE)
(2)
11.3
8.4
11.2
8.3
(1)
Average common stockholders’ equity for the 2018 periods includes the $22.6 billion impact from Tax Reform recorded at the end of the fourth quarter of 2017.
(2)
ROTCE represents annualized net income available to common shareholders as a percentage of average TCE.
37
Managing Global Risk Table of Contents
MANAGING GLOBAL RISK
39
CREDIT RISK
(1)
39
Consumer Credit
39
Corporate Credit
46
Additional Consumer and Corporate Credit Details
48
Loans Outstanding
48
Details of Credit Loss Experience
49
Allowance for Loan Losses
50
Non-Accrual Loans and Assets and Renegotiated Loans
51
LIQUIDITY RISK
55
High-Quality Liquid Assets (HQLA)
55
Loans
56
Deposits
56
Long-Term Debt
57
Secured Funding Transactions and Short-Term Borrowings
59
Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR)
59
Credit Ratings
60
MARKET RISK
(1)
62
Market Risk of Non-Trading Portfolios
62
Market Risk of Trading Portfolios
73
COUNTRY RISK
75
(1)
For additional information regarding certain credit risk, market risk and other quantitative and qualitative information, refer to Citi’s Pillar 3 Basel III Advanced Approaches Disclosures, as required by the rules of the Federal Reserve Board, on Citi’s Investor Relations website.
38
MANAGING GLOBAL RISK
For Citi, effective risk management is of primary importance to its overall operations. Accordingly, Citi’s risk management process has been designed to identify, monitor, evaluate and manage the principal risks it assumes in conducting its activities. Specifically, the activities that Citi engages in, and the risks those activities generate, must be consistent with Citi’s mission and value proposition, the key principles that guide it and Citi's risk appetite.
For more information on Citi’s management of global risk, including its three lines of defense, see “Managing Global Risk” in Citi’s
2017
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
CREDIT RISK
For additional information on credit risk, including Citi’s credit risk management, measurement and stress testing, see “Credit Risk” and “Risk Factors” in Citi’s
2017
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
CONSUMER CREDIT
Citi provides traditional retail banking, including commercial banking, and credit card products in 19 countries and jurisdictions through
North America GCB
,
Latin America GCB
and
Asia GCB
. The retail banking products include consumer mortgages, home equity, personal and commercial loans and lines of credit and similar related products with a focus on lending to prime customers. Citi uses its risk appetite framework to define its lending parameters. In addition, Citi uses proprietary scoring models for new customer approvals.
As stated in “
Global Consumer Banking
” above,
GCB
’s overall strategy is to leverage Citi’s global footprint and be the pre-eminent bank for the affluent and emerging affluent consumers in large urban centers. In credit cards and in certain retail markets (including commercial banking), Citi serves customers in a somewhat broader set of segments and geographies.
GCB
’s commercial banking business primarily focuses on small to mid-size businesses and also serves larger middle market companies in certain regions.
Consumer Credit Portfolio
The following table shows Citi’s quarterly end-of-period consumer loans:
(1)
In billions of dollars
3Q’17
4Q’17
1Q’18
2Q’18
3Q’18
Retail banking:
Mortgages
$
81.4
$
81.7
$
82.1
$
80.5
$
80.9
Commercial banking
35.5
36.3
36.8
36.5
37.2
Personal and other
27.3
27.9
28.5
28.1
28.7
Total retail banking
$
144.2
$
145.9
$
147.4
$
145.1
$
146.8
Cards:
Citi-branded cards
$
110.7
$
115.7
$
110.6
$
112.3
$
112.8
Citi retail services
45.9
49.2
46.0
48.6
49.4
Total cards
$
156.6
$
164.9
$
156.6
$
160.9
$
162.2
Total
GCB
$
300.8
$
310.8
$
304.0
$
306.0
$
309.0
GCB
regional distribution:
North America
62
%
63
%
61
%
63
%
62
%
Latin America
9
8
9
8
9
Asia
(2)
29
29
30
29
29
Total
GCB
100
%
100
%
100
%
100
%
100
%
Corporate/Other
(3)
$
24.8
$
22.9
$
21.1
$
17.6
$
16.5
Total consumer loans
$
325.6
$
333.7
$
325.1
$
323.6
$
325.5
(1)
End-of-period loans include interest and fees on credit cards.
(2)
Asia
includes loans and leases in certain
EMEA
countries for all periods presented.
(3)
Primarily consists of legacy assets, principally
North America
consumer mortgages.
39
For information on changes to Citi’s end-of-period consumer loans, see “Liquidity Risk—Loans” below.
Overall Consumer Credit Trends
The following charts show the quarterly trends in delinquencies and net credit losses across both retail banking, including commercial banking, and cards for total
GCB
and by region.
Global Consumer Banking
North America GCB
North America GCB
provides mortgages, home equity loans, personal loans and commercial banking products through Citi’s retail banking network and card products through Citi-branded cards and Citi retail services businesses. The retail bank is concentrated in six major metropolitan cities in the United States (for additional information on the U.S. retail bank, see “
North America GCB
” above).
As of September 30, 2018, approximately 71% of
North America GCB
consumer loans consisted of Citi-branded and Citi retail services cards, which generally drives the overall credit performance of
North America GCB
(for additional information on
North America GCB
’s cards portfolios, including delinquency and net credit loss rates, see “Credit Card Trends” below).
As shown in the chart above, the quarter-over-quarter net credit loss rate decreased while the 90+ days past due delinquency rate slightly increased, primarily driven by seasonality in both cards portfolios. The year-over-year net credit loss rate decreased due to an episodic charge-off in the commercial portfolio in the prior-year period, while the delinquency rate was broadly stable.
Latin America GCB
Latin America GCB
operates in Mexico through Citibanamex, one of Mexico’s largest banks, and provides credit cards, consumer mortgages, personal loans and commercial banking products.
Latin America GCB
serves a more mass market segment in Mexico and focuses on developing multi-product relationships with customers.
As set forth in the chart above, the 90+ days past due delinquency rate decreased quarter-over-quarter and year-over-year, primarily due to improvements in mortgages and the commercial portfolio. The quarter-over-quarter and year-over year net credit loss rate increased, primarily driven by an episodic charge-off in the commercial portfolio, which was offset by a related loan loss reserve release.
Asia
(1)
GCB
(1)
Asia
includes
GCB
activities in certain
EMEA
countries for all periods presented.
Asia GCB
operates in 17 countries in
Asia
and
EMEA
and provides credit cards, consumer mortgages, personal loans and commercial banking products.
As shown in the chart above, the 90+ days past due delinquency and net credit loss rates were broadly stable in
Asia GCB
quarter-over-quarter and year-over-year as of the third quarter of 2018. This stability reflects the strong credit profiles in
Asia GCB
’s target customer segments. In addition, regulatory changes in many markets in
Asia
over the past few years have resulted in stable portfolio credit quality.
For additional information on cost of credit, loan delinquency and other information for Citi’s consumer loan portfolios, see each respective business’s results of operations above and Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
40
Credit Card Trends
The following charts show the quarterly trends in delinquencies and net credit losses for total
GCB
cards,
North America
Citi-branded cards and Citi retail services portfolios as well as for
Latin America
and
Asia
Citi-branded cards portfolios.
Global Cards
North America Citi-Branded Cards
North America GCB
’s Citi-branded cards portfolio issues proprietary and co-branded cards. As shown in the chart above, quarter-over-quarter the 90+ days past due delinquency rate was stable while the net credit loss rate decreased primarily due to seasonality. The year-over-year increases in both the delinquency and net credit loss rates were driven primarily by portfolio seasoning.
North America Citi Retail Services
Citi retail services partners directly with more than 20 retailers and dealers to offer private-label and co-branded consumer and commercial cards. Citi retail services’ target market is focused on select industry segments such as home improvement, specialty retail, consumer electronics and fuel. Citi retail services continually evaluates opportunities to add partners within target industries that have strong loyalty, lending or payment programs and growth potential.
As shown in the chart above, Citi retail services’ 90+ days past due delinquency rate increased quarter-over-quarter, mainly due to seasonality, while the net credit loss rate decreased, primarily due to seasonality and the impact of recently acquired portfolios. The year-over-year net credit loss rate decrease was primarily driven by the impact of recently acquired portfolios.
Latin America Citi-Branded Cards
Latin America GCB
issues proprietary and co-branded cards. As set forth in the chart above, the quarter-over-quarter net credit loss rate increased while the 90+ days past due delinquency rate decreased, both primarily driven by seasonality. The year-over-year net credit loss and delinquency rates increased, primarily due to portfolio seasoning.
41
Asia Citi-Branded Cards
(1)
(1)
Asia
includes loans and leases in certain
EMEA
countries for all periods presented.
Asia GCB
issues proprietary and co-branded cards. As set forth in the chart above, the 90+ days past due delinquency rate has remained broadly stable, driven by the mature and well-diversified cards portfolios. The increase in the year-over-year net credit loss rate was primarily driven by the conversion of an acquired portfolio in Australia. The quarter-over-quarter decrease in the net credit loss rate was primarily related to improvements in this portfolio.
For additional information on cost of credit, delinquency and other information for Citi’s cards portfolios, see each respective business’s results of operations above and Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
North America Cards FICO Distribution
The following tables show the current FICO score distributions for Citi’s
North America
Citi-branded cards and Citi retail services portfolios based on end-of-period receivables. FICO scores are updated monthly for substantially all of the portfolio and on a quarterly basis for the remaining portfolio.
Citi-Branded
FICO distribution
September 30, 2018
June 30, 2018
September 30,
2017
> 760
42
%
43
%
40
%
680 - 760
41
40
41
< 680
17
17
19
Total
100
%
100
%
100
%
Citi Retail Services
FICO distribution
September 30, 2018
June 30, 2018
September 30, 2017
> 760
24
%
24
%
23
%
680 - 760
43
43
43
< 680
33
33
34
Total
100
%
100
%
100
%
The FICO distribution of both portfolios was stable compared to the previous quarter and previous year. The portfolios continued to demonstrate strong underlying credit quality. For additional information on FICO scores, see Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
42
North America Consumer Mortgage Lending
Citi’s
North
America
consumer mortgage portfolio consists of both residential first mortgages and home equity loans. The following table shows the outstanding quarterly end-of-period loans for Citi’s
North America
residential first mortgage and home equity loan portfolios:
In billions of dollars
3Q’17
4Q’17
1Q’18
2Q’18
3Q’18
GCB
:
Residential firsts
$
40.1
$
40.1
$
40.1
$
40.3
$
40.7
Home equity
4.1
4.2
4.1
4.1
3.9
Total
GCB
$
44.2
$
44.3
$
44.2
$
44.4
$
44.6
Corporate/Other
:
Residential firsts
$
10.1
$
9.3
$
8.1
$
7.6
$
7.0
Home equity
11.5
10.6
9.9
8.8
8.2
Total
Corporate/
Other
$
21.6
$
19.9
$
18.0
$
16.4
$
15.2
Total Citigroup—
North America
$
65.8
$
64.2
$
62.2
$
60.8
$
59.8
For additional information on delinquency and net credit loss trends in Citi’s consumer mortgage portfolio, see “Additional Consumer Credit Details” below.
Home Equity Loans—Revolving HELOCs
As set forth in the table above, Citi had $12.1 billion of home equity loans as of
September 30, 2018
, of which $2.5 billion were fixed-rate home equity loans and $9.6 billion were extended under home equity lines of credit (Revolving HELOCs). Fixed-rate home equity loans are fully amortizing. Revolving HELOCs allow for amounts to be drawn for a period of time with the payment of interest only until the end of the draw period, when the outstanding amount is converted to an amortizing loan, or “reset” (the interest-only payment feature during the revolving period is standard for this product across the industry). Upon reset, these borrowers will be required to pay both interest, usually at a variable rate, and principal that amortizes typically over 20 years, rather than the standard 30-year amortization.
Of the Revolving HELOCs at
September 30, 2018
, $6.2 billion had reset (compared to $6.4 billion at June 30, 2018) and $3.4 billion were still within their revolving period and had not reset (compared to $3.7 billion at June 30, 2018). The following chart indicates the FICO and combined loan-to-value (CLTV) characteristics of Citi’s Revolving HELOCs portfolio and the year in which they reset:
North America Home Equity Lines of Credit Amortization – Citigroup
Total ENR by Reset Year
In billions of dollars as of September 30, 2018
Note: Totals may not sum due to rounding.
Approximately 64% of Citi’s total Revolving HELOCs portfolio had reset as of
September 30, 2018
(compared to 63% as of June 30, 2018). Of the remaining Revolving HELOCs portfolio, approximately 2% will commence amortization during the remainder of 2018. Citi’s customers with Revolving HELOCs that reset could experience “payment shock” due to the higher required payments on the loans. Citi currently estimates that the monthly loan payment for its Revolving HELOCs that reset during the remainder of 2018 could increase on average by approximately $270, or 98%. Increases in interest rates could further increase these payments given the variable nature of the interest rates on these loans post-reset. Borrowers’ high loan-to-value positions, as well as the cost and availability of refinancing options, could limit borrowers’ ability to refinance their Revolving HELOCs as these loans continue to reset.
Approximately 5.5% of the Revolving HELOCs that have reset as of
September 30, 2018
were 30+ days past due, compared to 3.7% of the total outstanding home equity loan portfolio (amortizing and non-amortizing). This compared to 5.3% and 3.6%, respectively, as of June 30, 2018. As newly amortizing loans continue to season, the delinquency rate of Citi’s total home equity loan portfolio could increase. Although interest rates have steadily increased over the past 12 months, resets to date have generally occurred during a period of historically low interest rates, which Citi believes has likely reduced the overall “payment shock” to the borrower.
Citi monitors this reset risk closely and will continue to consider any potential impact in determining its allowance for loan loss reserves. In addition, management continues to review and take additional actions to offset potential reset risk, such as establishing a borrower outreach program to provide reset risk education and proactively working with high-risk borrowers through a specialized single point of contact unit.
43
Additional Consumer Credit Details
Consumer Loan Delinquency Amounts and Ratios
EOP
loans
(1)
90+ days past due
(2)
30–89 days past due
(2)
In millions of dollars,
except EOP loan amounts in billions
September 30,
2018
September 30,
2018
June 30,
2018
September 30,
2017
September 30,
2018
June 30,
2018
September 30,
2017
Global Consumer Banking
(3)(4)
Total
$
309.0
$
2,404
$
2,345
$
2,279
$
2,890
$
2,558
$
2,763
Ratio
0.78
%
0.77
%
0.76
%
0.94
%
0.84
%
0.92
%
Retail banking
Total
$
146.8
$
508
$
500
$
489
$
857
$
754
$
805
Ratio
0.35
%
0.35
%
0.34
%
0.59
%
0.52
%
0.56
%
North America
56.3
188
179
167
320
252
270
Ratio
0.34
%
0.33
%
0.30
%
0.58
%
0.46
%
0.49
%
Latin America
21.0
126
132
151
235
183
244
Ratio
0.60
%
0.66
%
0.72
%
1.12
%
0.91
%
1.16
%
Asia
(5)
69.5
194
189
171
302
319
291
Ratio
0.28
%
0.27
%
0.25
%
0.43
%
0.46
%
0.43
%
Cards
Total
$
162.2
$
1,896
$
1,845
$
1,790
$
2,033
$
1,804
$
1,958
Ratio
1.17
%
1.15
%
1.14
%
1.25
%
1.12
%
1.25
%
North America
—Citi-branded
88.4
707
712
668
722
627
705
Ratio
0.80
%
0.81
%
0.77
%
0.82
%
0.71
%
0.82
%
North America
—Citi retail services
49.4
832
781
772
890
761
836
Ratio
1.68
%
1.61
%
1.68
%
1.80
%
1.57
%
1.82
%
Latin America
5.8
169
160
159
170
156
163
Ratio
2.91
%
2.96
%
2.84
%
2.93
%
2.89
%
2.91
%
Asia
(5)
18.6
188
192
191
251
260
254
Ratio
1.01
%
1.02
%
1.02
%
1.35
%
1.38
%
1.35
%
Corporate/Other
—Consumer
(6)
Total
$
16.5
$
401
$
415
$
605
$
422
$
355
$
643
Ratio
2.57
%
2.49
%
2.57
%
2.71
%
2.13
%
2.74
%
International
—
—
—
57
—
—
47
Ratio
—
%
—
%
3.35
%
—
%
—
%
2.76
%
North America
16.5
401
415
548
422
355
596
Ratio
2.57
%
2.49
%
2.51
%
2.71
%
2.13
%
2.73
%
Total Citigroup
$
325.5
$
2,805
$
2,760
$
2,884
$
3,312
$
2,913
$
3,406
Ratio
0.87
%
0.86
%
0.89
%
1.02
%
0.90
%
1.05
%
(1)
End-of-period (EOP) loans include interest and fees on credit cards.
(2)
The ratios of 90+ days past due and 30–89 days past due are calculated based on EOP loans, net of unearned income.
(3)
The 90+ days past due balances for
North America
—Citi-branded
and
North America
—Citi retail services are generally still accruing interest. Citigroup’s policy is generally to accrue interest on credit card loans until 180 days past due, unless notification of bankruptcy filing has been received earlier.
(4)
The 90+ days past due and 30–89 days past due and related ratios for
North America GCB
exclude U.S. mortgage loans that are guaranteed by U.S. government-sponsored entities since the potential loss predominantly resides within the U.S. government-sponsored entities. The amounts excluded for loans 90+ days past due and (EOP loans) were $235 million ($0.7 billion), $244 million ($0.7 billion) and $289 million ($0.7 billion) as of September 30, 2018, June 30, 2018 and September 30, 2017, respectively. The amounts excluded for loans 30–89 days past due and (EOP loans) were $82 million ($0.7 billion), $87 million ($0.7 billion), and $79 million ($0.7 billion) as of September 30, 2018, June 30, 2018 and September 30, 2017, respectively.
(5)
Asia
includes delinquencies and loans in certain
EMEA
countries for all periods presented.
(6)
The loans 90+ days past due and related ratios exclude U.S. mortgage loans that are guaranteed by U.S. government-sponsored agencies since the potential loss predominantly resides with the U.S. agencies. The amounts excluded for 90+ days past due and (EOP loans) for each period were $0.4 billion ($0.8 billion), $0.4 billion ($0.9 billion) and $0.7 billion ($1.2 billion) as of September 30, 2018, June 30, 2018 and September 30, 2017, respectively. The amounts excluded for loans 30–89 days past due and (EOP loans) for each period were $0.1 billion ($0.8 billion), $0.1 billion ($0.9 billion), and $0.1 billion ($1.2 billion) as of September 30, 2018, June 30, 2018 and September 30, 2017, respectively.
44
Consumer Loan Net Credit Losses and Ratios
Average
loans
(1)
Net credit losses
(2)(3)
In millions of dollars, except average loan amounts in billions
3Q18
3Q18
2Q18
3Q17
Global Consumer Banking
Total
$
306.8
$
1,714
$
1,726
$
1,704
Ratio
2.22
%
2.28
%
2.26
%
Retail banking
Total
$
145.9
$
243
$
228
$
300
Ratio
0.66
%
0.63
%
0.82
%
North America
56.0
32
32
88
Ratio
0.23
%
0.23
%
0.63
%
Latin America
20.7
153
138
143
Ratio
2.93
%
2.75
%
2.68
%
Asia
(4)
69.2
58
58
69
Ratio
0.33
%
0.33
%
0.41
%
Cards
Total
$
160.9
$
1,471
$
1,498
$
1,404
Ratio
3.63
%
3.81
%
3.58
%
North America
—Citi-branded
87.8
644
657
611
Ratio
2.91
%
3.04
%
2.84
%
North America
—Citi retail services
49.0
566
589
540
Ratio
4.58
%
5.07
%
4.70
%
Latin America
5.6
154
140
152
Ratio
10.91
%
10.40
%
10.77
%
Asia
(4)
18.5
107
112
101
Ratio
2.29
%
2.38
%
2.13
%
Corporate/Other
—Consumer
(3)
Total
$
17.0
$
12
$
(20
)
$
52
Ratio
0.28
%
(0.41
)%
0.80
%
International
—
—
19
25
Ratio
—
%
6.93
%
5.22
%
North America
17.0
12
(39
)
27
Ratio
0.28
%
(0.85
)%
0.45
%
Other
(5)
—
—
—
(22
)
Total Citigroup
$
323.8
$
1,726
$
1,706
$
1,734
Ratio
2.11
%
2.12
%
2.11
%
(1)
Average loans include interest and fees on credit cards.
(2)
The ratios of net credit losses are calculated based on average loans, net of unearned income.
(3)
In October 2016, Citi entered into an agreement to sell Citi’s Brazil consumer banking business. The sale was completed at the end of the fourth quarter of 2017. As a result of HFS accounting treatment, approximately $37 million of net credit losses (NCLs) was recorded as a reduction in revenue (
Other revenue
) during the third quarter of 2017. Accordingly, these NCLs are not included in this table. Loans classified as HFS are excluded from this table as they are recorded in
Other assets.
(4)
Asia
includes NCLs and average loans in certain
EMEA
countries for all periods presented.
(5)
The third quarter of 2017 NCLs reflected a recovery related to legacy assets.
45
CORPORATE CREDIT
Consistent with its overall strategy, Citi’s corporate clients are typically large, multinational corporations that value the depth and breadth of Citi’s global network. Citi aims to establish relationships with these clients that encompass multiple products, consistent with client needs, including cash management and trade services, foreign exchange, lending, capital markets and M&A advisory.
Corporate Credit Portfolio
The following table sets forth Citi’s corporate credit portfolio within
ICG
(excluding private bank), before consideration of collateral or hedges, by remaining tenor for the periods indicated:
At September 30, 2018
June 30, 2018
December 31, 2017
In billions of dollars
Due
within
1 year
Greater
than 1 year
but within
5 years
Greater
than
5 years
Total
exposure
Due
within
1 year
Greater
than 1 year
but within
5 years
Greater
than
5 years
Total
exposure
Due
within
1 year
Greater
than 1 year
but within
5 years
Greater
than
5 years
Total
exposure
Direct outstandings (on-balance sheet)
(1)
$
131
$
103
$
20
$
254
$
133
$
103
$
19
$
255
$
127
$
96
$
22
$
245
Unfunded lending commitments (off-balance sheet)
(2)
115
253
25
393
127
235
20
382
111
222
20
353
Total exposure
$
246
$
356
$
45
$
647
$
260
$
338
$
39
$
637
$
238
$
318
$
42
$
598
(1)
Includes drawn loans, overdrafts, bankers’ acceptances and leases.
(2)
Includes unused commitments to lend, letters of credit and financial guarantees.
Portfolio Mix—Geography, Counterparty and Industry
Citi’s corporate credit portfolio is diverse across geography and counterparty. The following table shows the percentage of this portfolio by region based on Citi’s internal management geography:
September 30,
2018
June 30,
2018
December 31,
2017
North America
55
%
54
%
54
%
EMEA
27
27
27
Asia
11
12
12
Latin America
7
7
7
Total
100
%
100
%
100
%
The maintenance of accurate and consistent risk ratings across the corporate credit portfolio facilitates the comparison of credit exposure across all lines of business, geographic regions and products. Counterparty risk ratings reflect an estimated probability of default for a counterparty and are derived primarily through the use of validated statistical models, scorecard models and external agency ratings (under defined circumstances), in combination with consideration of factors specific to the obligor or market, such as management experience, competitive position,
regulatory environment and commodity prices. Facility risk ratings are assigned that reflect the probability of default of
the obligor and factors that affect the loss-given-default of the facility, such as support or collateral. Internal obligor ratings that generally correspond to BBB and above are
considered investment grade, while those below are considered non-investment grade.
Citigroup also has incorporated environmental factors like climate risk assessment and reporting criteria for certain obligors, as necessary. Factors evaluated include consideration of climate risk to an obligor’s business and physical assets and, when relevant, consideration of cost-effective options to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
46
The following table presents the corporate credit portfolio by facility risk rating as a percentage of the total corporate credit portfolio:
Total exposure
September 30,
2018
June 30,
2018
December 31,
2017
AAA/AA/A
48
%
49
%
49
%
BBB
34
34
34
BB/B
17
16
16
CCC or below
1
1
1
Total
100
%
100
%
100
%
Note: Total exposure includes direct outstandings and unfunded lending commitments.
Citi’s corporate credit portfolio is also diversified by industry. The following table shows the allocation of Citi’s total corporate credit portfolio by industry:
Total exposure
September 30,
2018
June 30,
2018
December 31,
2017
Transportation and industrial
21
%
22
%
22
%
Consumer retail and health
16
16
16
Technology, media and telecom
14
13
12
Power, chemicals, metals and mining
11
10
10
Energy and commodities
8
8
8
Banks/broker-dealers/finance companies
8
8
8
Real estate
8
7
8
Public sector
5
5
5
Insurance and special purpose entities
4
4
5
Hedge funds
4
4
4
Other industries
1
3
2
Total
100
%
100
%
100
%
Credit Risk Mitigation
As part of its overall risk management activities, Citigroup uses credit derivatives and other risk mitigants to hedge portions of the credit risk in its corporate credit portfolio, in addition to outright asset sales. The results of the mark-to-market and any realized gains or losses on credit derivatives are reflected primarily in
Other revenue
in the Consolidated Statement of Income.
At
September 30, 2018
, June 30, 2018 and
December 31, 2017
, $26.9 billion, $27.4 billion and $16.3 billion, respectively, of the corporate credit portfolio was economically hedged. Citigroup’s expected loss model used in the calculation of its loan loss reserve does not include the favorable impact of credit derivatives and other mitigants that are marked to market. In addition, the reported amounts of direct outstandings and unfunded lending commitments in the tables above do not reflect the impact of these hedging transactions. The credit protection was economically hedging underlying corporate credit portfolio exposures with the following risk rating distribution:
Rating of Hedged Exposure
September 30,
2018
June 30,
2018
December 31,
2017
AAA/AA/A
34
%
34
%
23
%
BBB
47
46
43
BB/B
17
18
31
CCC or below
2
2
3
Total
100
%
100
%
100
%
The credit protection was economically hedging underlying corporate credit portfolio exposures with the following industry distribution:
Industry of Hedged Exposure
September 30,
2018
June 30,
2018
December 31,
2017
Transportation and industrial
25
%
25
%
27
%
Technology, media and telecom
15
15
12
Consumer retail and health
14
15
10
Power, chemicals, metals and mining
14
14
14
Energy and commodities
11
11
15
Public sector
7
7
12
Banks/broker-dealers/finance companies
5
4
6
Insurance and special purpose entities
4
5
2
Other industries
5
4
2
Total
100
%
100
%
100
%
47
ADDITIONAL CONSUMER AND CORPORATE CREDIT DETAILS
Loans Outstanding
3rd Qtr.
2nd Qtr.
1st Qtr.
4th Qtr.
3rd Qtr.
In millions of dollars
2018
2018
2018
2017
2017
Consumer loans
In U.S. offices
Mortgage and real estate
(1)
$
61,048
$
61,692
$
63,412
$
65,467
$
67,131
Installment, revolving credit and other
3,515
3,759
3,306
3,398
3,191
Cards
137,051
135,968
131,081
139,006
131,476
Commercial and industrial
7,686
7,459
7,493
7,840
7,619
Total
$
209,300
$
208,878
$
205,292
$
215,711
$
209,417
In offices outside the U.S.
Mortgage and real estate
(1)
$
43,714
$
43,056
$
44,833
$
44,081
$
43,723
Installment, revolving credit and other
27,899
27,254
27,651
26,556
26,153
Cards
24,971
24,712
25,993
26,257
25,443
Commercial and industrial
18,821
18,966
20,526
20,238
20,015
Lease financing
52
55
62
76
77
Total
$
115,457
$
114,043
$
119,065
$
117,208
$
115,411
Total consumer loans
$
324,757
$
322,921
$
324,357
$
332,919
$
324,828
Unearned income
(2)
712
711
727
737
748
Consumer loans, net of unearned income
$
325,469
$
323,632
$
325,084
$
333,656
$
325,576
Corporate loans
In U.S. offices
Commercial and industrial
$
51,365
$
53,260
$
54,005
$
51,319
$
51,679
Financial institutions
46,255
42,867
40,472
39,128
37,203
Mortgage and real estate
(1)
47,629
46,310
45,581
44,683
43,274
Installment, revolving credit and other
32,201
32,663
32,866
33,181
32,464
Lease financing
1,445
1,445
1,463
1,470
1,493
Total
$
178,895
$
176,545
$
174,387
$
169,781
$
166,113
In offices outside the U.S.
Commercial and industrial
$
98,281
$
98,068
$
101,368
$
93,750
$
93,107
Financial institutions
37,851
38,312
35,659
35,273
33,050
Mortgage and real estate
(1)
7,344
7,261
7,543
7,309
6,383
Installment, revolving credit and other
22,827
22,755
23,338
22,638
23,830
Lease financing
131
139
167
190
216
Governments and official institutions
4,898
5,270
6,170
5,200
5,628
Total
$
171,332
$
171,805
$
174,245
$
164,360
$
162,214
Total corporate loans
$
350,227
$
348,350
$
348,632
$
334,141
$
328,327
Unearned income
(3)
(787
)
(802
)
(778
)
(763
)
(720
)
Corporate loans, net of unearned income
$
349,440
$
347,548
$
347,854
$
333,378
$
327,607
Total loans—net of unearned income
$
674,909
$
671,180
$
672,938
$
667,034
$
653,183
Allowance for loan losses—on drawn exposures
(12,336
)
(12,126
)
(12,354
)
(12,355
)
(12,366
)
Total loans—net of unearned income
and allowance for credit losses
$
662,573
$
659,054
$
660,584
$
654,679
$
640,817
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans—
net of unearned income
(4)
1.84
%
1.81
%
1.85
%
1.87
%
1.91
%
Allowance for consumer loan losses as a percentage of
total consumer loans—net of unearned income
(4)
3.07
%
3.03
%
3.09
%
2.96
%
3.04
%
Allowance for corporate loan losses as a percentage of
total corporate loans—net of unearned income
(4)
0.68
%
0.68
%
0.67
%
0.76
%
0.77
%
(1)
Loans secured primarily by real estate.
(2)
Unearned income on consumer loans primarily represents unamortized origination fees and costs, premiums and discounts.
(3)
Unearned income on corporate loans primarily represents interest received in advance, but not yet earned, on loans originated on a discounted basis.
(4)
All periods exclude loans that are carried at fair value.
48
Details of Credit Loss Experience
3rd Qtr.
2nd Qtr.
1st Qtr.
4th Qtr.
3rd Qtr.
In millions of dollars
2018
2018
2018
2017
2017
Allowance for loan losses at beginning of period
$
12,126
$
12,354
$
12,355
$
12,366
$
12,025
Provision for loan losses
Consumer
$
1,869
$
1,764
$
1,881
$
1,785
$
2,142
Corporate
37
31
(78
)
231
4
Total
$
1,906
$
1,795
$
1,803
$
2,016
$
2,146
Gross credit losses
Consumer
In U.S. offices
$
1,462
$
1,490
$
1,542
$
1,426
$
1,429
In offices outside the U.S.
596
599
615
611
642
Corporate
In U.S. offices
15
5
65
21
15
In offices outside the U.S.
21
15
74
221
34
Total
$
2,094
$
2,109
$
2,296
$
2,279
$
2,120
Credit recoveries
(1)
Consumer
In U.S. offices
$
212
$
255
$
238
$
228
$
167
In offices outside the U.S.
120
128
148
151
170
Corporate
In U.S. offices
1
5
13
4
2
In offices outside the U.S.
5
17
30
16
4
Total
$
338
$
405
$
429
$
399
$
343
Net credit losses
In U.S. offices
$
1,264
$
1,235
$
1,356
$
1,215
$
1,275
In offices outside the U.S.
492
469
511
665
502
Total
$
1,756
$
1,704
$
1,867
$
1,880
$
1,777
Other—net
(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)
$
60
$
(319
)
$
63
$
(147
)
$
(28
)
Allowance for loan losses at end of period
$
12,336
$
12,126
$
12,354
$
12,355
$
12,366
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans
(8)
1.84
%
1.81
%
1.85
%
1.87
%
1.91
%
Allowance for unfunded lending commitments
(9)
$
1,321
$
1,278
$
1,290
$
1,258
$
1,232
Total allowance for loan losses and unfunded lending commitments
$
13,657
$
13,404
$
13,644
$
13,613
$
13,598
Net consumer credit losses
$
1,726
$
1,706
$
1,771
$
1,658
$
1,734
As a percentage of average consumer loans
2.11
%
2.12
%
2.19
%
2.02
%
2.11
%
Net corporate credit losses (recoveries)
$
30
$
(2
)
$
96
$
222
$
43
As a percentage of average corporate loans
0.03
%
—
%
0.11
%
0.27
%
0.05
%
Allowance by type at end of period
(10)
Consumer
$
9,997
$
9,796
$
10,039
$
9,869
$
9,892
Corporate
2,339
2,330
2,315
2,486
2,474
Total
$
12,336
$
12,126
$
12,354
$
12,355
$
12,366
(1)
Recoveries have been reduced by certain collection costs that are incurred only if collection efforts are successful.
(2)
Includes all adjustments to the allowance for credit losses, such as changes in the allowance from acquisitions, dispositions, securitizations, FX translation, purchase accounting adjustments, etc.
(3)
The third quarter of 2018 includes a reduction of approximately $5 million related to the sale or transfers to held-for-sale (HFS) of various loan portfolios, including a reduction of $2 million related to the transfers of a real estate loan portfolio to HFS. Additionally, the third quarter includes an increase of approximately $62 million related to FX translation.
(4)
The second quarter of 2018 includes a reduction of approximately $137 million related to the sale or transfer to HFS of various loan portfolios, including a reduction of $33 million related to the transfer of a real estate loan portfolio to HFS. Additionally, the second quarter includes a decrease of approximately $164 million related to FX translation.
(5)
The first quarter of 2018 includes a reduction of approximately $55 million related to the sale or transfer to HFS of various loan portfolios, including a reduction of $53 million related to the transfer of a real estate loan portfolio to HFS. Additionally, the first quarter includes an increase of approximately $118 million related to FX translation.
49
(6)
The fourth quarter of 2017 includes a reduction of approximately $47 million related to the sale or transfer to HFS of various loan portfolios, including a reduction of $22 million related to the transfer of a real estate loan portfolio to HFS. Additionally, the fourth quarter includes a decrease of approximately $106 million related to FX translation.
(7)
The third quarter of 2017 includes a reduction of approximately $34 million related to the sale or transfer to HFS of various loan portfolios, including a reduction of $28 million related to the transfer of a real estate loan portfolio to HFS. Additionally, the third quarter includes an increase of approximately $7 million related to FX translation.
(8)
September 30, 2018, June 30, 2018, March 31, 2018, December 31, 2017 and September 30, 2017 exclude $4.2 billion, $3.0 billion, $4.5 billion, $4.9 billion and $4.3 billion, respectively, of loans which are carried at fair value.
(9)
Represents additional credit reserves recorded as
Other liabilities
on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
(10)
Allowance for loan losses represents management’s best estimate of probable losses inherent in the portfolio, as well as probable losses related to large individually evaluated impaired loans and troubled debt restructurings. See “Significant Accounting Policies and Significant Estimates” and Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Citi’s 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Attribution of the allowance is made for analytical purposes only and the entire allowance is available to absorb probable credit losses inherent in the overall portfolio.
Allowance for Loan Losses
The following tables detail information on Citi’s allowance for loan losses, loans and coverage ratios:
September 30, 2018
In billions of dollars
Allowance for
loan losses
Loans, net of
unearned income
Allowance as a
percentage of loans
(1)
North America
cards
(2)
$
6.4
$
137.9
4.6
%
North America
mortgages
(3)
0.5
59.8
0.8
North America
other
0.3
12.8
2.3
International cards
1.4
24.4
5.7
International other
(4)
1.4
90.6
1.5
Total consumer
$
10.0
$
325.5
3.1
%
Total corporate
2.3
349.4
0.7
Total Citigroup
$
12.3
$
674.9
1.8
%
(1)
Allowance as a percentage of loans excludes loans that are carried at fair value.
(2)
Includes both Citi-branded cards and Citi retail services. The
$6.4 billion
of loan loss reserves represented approximately 16 months of coincident net credit loss coverage.
(3)
Of the $
0.5 billion
, approximately $0.4 billion was allocated to
North America
mortgages in
Corporate/Other
. Of the $
0.5 billion
, approximately
$0.2 billion
and $0.3 billion are determined in accordance with ASC 450-20 and ASC 310-10-35 (troubled debt restructurings), respectively. Of the $
59.8 billion
in loans, approximately $57.0 billion and $2.7 billion of the loans are evaluated in accordance with ASC 450-20 and ASC 310-10-35 (troubled debt restructurings), respectively. For additional information, see Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(4)
Includes mortgages and other retail loans.
December 31, 2017
In billions of dollars
Allowance for
loan losses
Loans, net of
unearned income
Allowance as a
percentage of loans
(1)
North America
cards
(2)
$
6.1
$
139.7
4.4
%
North America
mortgages
(3)
0.7
64.2
1.1
North America
other
0.3
13.0
2.3
International cards
1.3
25.7
5.1
International other
(4)
1.5
91.1
1.6
Total consumer
$
9.9
$
333.7
3.0
%
Total corporate
2.5
333.3
0.8
Total Citigroup
$
12.4
$
667.0
1.9
%
(1)
Allowance as a percentage of loans excludes loans that are carried at fair value.
(2)
Includes both Citi-branded cards and Citi retail services. The
$6.1 billion
of loan loss reserves represented approximately 16 months of coincident net credit loss coverage.
(3)
Of the $
0.7 billion
, approximately $0.6 billion was allocated to
North America
mortgages in
Corporate/Other
. Of the $
0.7 billion
, approximately $0.2 billion and $0.5 billion are determined in accordance with ASC 450-20 and ASC 310-10-35 (troubled debt restructurings), respectively. Of the $
64.2 billion
in loans, approximately $60.4 billion and $3.7 billion are evaluated in accordance with ASC 450-20 and ASC 310-10-35 (troubled debt restructurings), respectively. For additional information, see Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(4)
Includes mortgages and other retail loans.
50
Non-Accrual Loans and Assets and Renegotiated Loans
There is a certain amount of overlap among non-accrual loans and assets and renegotiated loans. The following summary provides a general description of each category:
Non-Accrual Loans and Assets
:
•
Corporate and consumer (including commercial banking) non-accrual status is based on the determination that payment of interest or principal is doubtful.
•
A corporate loan may be classified as non-accrual and still be performing under the terms of the loan structure. Payments received on corporate non-accrual loans are generally applied to loan principal and not reflected as interest income. Approximately 57%, 68% and 74% of Citi’s corporate non-accrual loans were performing at
September 30, 2018
, June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively.
•
Consumer non-accrual status is generally based on aging, i.e., the borrower has fallen behind on payments.
•
Consumer mortgage loans, other than Federal Housing Administration (FHA) insured loans, are classified as non-accrual within 60 days of notification that the borrower has filed for bankruptcy. In addition, home equity loans are classified as non-accrual if the related residential first mortgage loan is 90 days or more past due.
•
North America
Citi-branded cards and Citi retail services are not included because, under industry standards, credit card loans accrue interest until such loans are charged off, which typically occurs at 180 days of contractual delinquency.
Renegotiated Loans
:
•
Includes both corporate and consumer loans whose terms have been modified in a troubled debt restructuring (TDR).
•
Includes both accrual and non-accrual TDRs.
51
Non-Accrual Loans
The table below summarizes Citigroup’s non-accrual loans as of the periods indicated. Non-accrual loans may still be current on interest payments. In situations where Citi reasonably expects that only a portion of the principal owed will ultimately be collected, all payments received are reflected as a reduction of principal and not as interest income. For all other non-accrual loans, cash interest receipts are generally recorded as revenue.
Sept. 30,
Jun. 30,
Mar. 31,
Dec. 31,
Sept. 30,
In millions of dollars
2018
2018
2018
2017
2017
Corporate non-accrual loans
(1)
North America
$
679
$
784
$
817
$
784
$
915
EMEA
362
391
561
849
681
Latin America
266
204
263
280
312
Asia
233
244
27
29
146
Total corporate non-accrual loans
$
1,540
$
1,623
$
1,668
$
1,942
$
2,054
Consumer non-accrual loans
(1)
North America
$
1,323
$
1,373
$
1,500
$
1,650
$
1,721
Latin America
764
726
791
756
791
Asia
(2)
287
284
284
284
271
Total consumer non-accrual loans
$
2,374
$
2,383
$
2,575
$
2,690
$
2,783
Total non-accrual loans
$
3,914
$
4,006
$
4,243
$
4,632
$
4,837
(1)
Excludes purchased distressed loans, as they are generally accreting interest. The carrying value of these loans was $131 million at
September 30, 2018
, $149 million
at June 30, 2018, $126 million at March 31, 2018, $167 million at
December 31,
2017
and $177 million at
September 30,
2017
.
(2)
Asia GCB
includes balances in certain
EMEA
countries for all periods presented.
The changes in Citigroup’s non-accrual loans were as follows:
Three Months Ended
Three Months Ended
September 30, 2018
September 30, 2017
In millions of dollars
Corporate
Consumer
Total
Corporate
Consumer
Total
Non-accrual loans at beginning of period
$
1,623
$
2,383
$
4,006
$
2,098
$
2,848
$
4,946
Additions
436
758
1,194
190
1,042
1,232
Sales and transfers to HFS
(9
)
(44
)
(53
)
(1
)
(69
)
(70
)
Returned to performing
(14
)
(136
)
(150
)
(2
)
(133
)
(135
)
Paydowns/settlements
(479
)
(207
)
(686
)
(196
)
(291
)
(487
)
Charge-offs
(18
)
(417
)
(435
)
(33
)
(611
)
(644
)
Other
1
37
38
(2
)
(3
)
(5
)
Ending balance
$
1,540
$
2,374
$
3,914
$
2,054
$
2,783
$
4,837
52
Nine Months Ended
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2018
September 30, 2017
In millions of dollars
Corporate
Consumer
Total
Corporate
Consumer
Total
Non-accrual loans at beginning of period
$
1,942
$
2,690
$
4,632
$
2,421
$
3,158
$
5,579
Additions
1,889
2,410
4,299
754
2,563
3,317
Sales and transfers to held-for-sale
(37
)
(197
)
(234
)
(83
)
(286
)
(369
)
Returned to performing
(118
)
(490
)
(608
)
(42
)
(462
)
(504
)
Paydowns/settlements
(1,976
)
(804
)
(2,780
)
(843
)
(856
)
(1,699
)
Charge-offs
(138
)
(1,243
)
(1,381
)
(102
)
(1,452
)
(1,554
)
Other
(22
)
8
(14
)
(51
)
118
67
Ending balance
$
1,540
$
2,374
$
3,914
$
2,054
$
2,783
$
4,837
The table below summarizes Citigroup’s other real estate owned (OREO) assets as of the periods indicated. This represents the carrying value of all real estate property acquired by foreclosure or other legal proceedings when Citi has taken possession of the collateral:
Sept. 30,
Jun. 30,
Mar. 31,
Dec. 31,
Sept. 30,
In millions of dollars
2018
2018
2018
2017
2017
OREO
North America
$
76
$
66
$
70
$
89
$
97
EMEA
1
1
—
2
1
Latin America
25
24
29
35
30
Asia
7
10
15
18
15
Total OREO
$
109
$
101
$
114
$
144
$
143
Non-accrual assets
Corporate non-accrual loans
$
1,540
$
1,623
$
1,668
$
1,942
$
2,054
Consumer non-accrual loans
2,374
2,383
2,575
2,690
2,783
Non-accrual loans (NAL)
$
3,914
$
4,006
$
4,243
$
4,632
$
4,837
OREO
$
109
$
101
$
114
$
144
$
143
Non-accrual assets (NAA)
$
4,023
$
4,107
$
4,357
$
4,776
$
4,980
NAL as a percentage of total loans
0.58
%
0.60
%
0.63
%
0.69
%
0.74
%
NAA as a percentage of total assets
0.21
0.21
0.23
0.26
0.26
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of NAL
(1)
315
303
291
267
256
(1)
The allowance for loan losses includes the allowance for Citi’s credit card portfolios and purchased distressed loans, while the non-accrual loans exclude credit card balances (with the exception of certain international portfolios) and purchased distressed loans as these continue to accrue interest until charge-off.
53
Renegotiated Loans
The following table presents Citi’s loans modified in TDRs:
In millions of dollars
Sept. 30, 2018
Dec. 31, 2017
Corporate renegotiated loans
(1)
In U.S. offices
Commercial and industrial
(2)
$
226
$
225
Mortgage and real estate
64
90
Financial institutions
21
33
Other
33
45
Total
$
344
$
393
In offices outside the U.S.
Commercial and industrial
(2)
$
254
$
392
Mortgage and real estate
7
11
Financial institutions
—
15
Other
9
7
Total
$
270
$
425
Total corporate renegotiated loans
$
614
$
818
Consumer renegotiated loans
(3)(4)(5)
In U.S. offices
Mortgage and real estate
(6)
$
2,698
$
3,709
Cards
1,308
1,246
Installment and other
84
169
Total
$
4,090
$
5,124
In offices outside the U.S.
Mortgage and real estate
$
320
$
345
Cards
493
541
Installment and other
415
427
Total
$
1,228
$
1,313
Total consumer renegotiated loans
$
5,318
$
6,437
(1)
Includes $504 million and $715 million of non-accrual loans included in the non-accrual loans table above at
September 30, 2018
and December 31, 2017, respectively. The remaining loans are accruing interest.
(2)
In addition to modifications reflected as TDRs at September 30, 2018, Citi also modified $6 million of commercial loans risk rated “Substandard Non-Performing” or worse (asset category defined by banking regulators) in offices outside the U.S. These modifications were not considered TDRs because the modifications did not involve a concession.
(3)
Includes $1,113 million and $1,376 million of non-accrual loans included in the non-accrual loans table above at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively. The remaining loans are accruing interest.
(4)
Includes $19 million and $26 million of commercial real estate loans at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively.
(5)
Includes $94 million and $165 million of other commercial loans at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively.
(6)
Reduction in the nine months ended September 30, 2018 compared with December 31, 2017 includes $641 million related to TDRs sold or transferred to HFS.
54
LIQUIDITY RISK
For additional information on funding and liquidity at Citigroup, including its objectives, management and measurement, see “Liquidity Risk” and “Risk Factors” in Citi’s
2017
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
High-Quality Liquid Assets (HQLA)
Citibank
Non-Bank and Other
Total
In billions of dollars
Sept. 30, 2018
Jun. 30, 2018
Sept. 30, 2017
Sept. 30, 2018
Jun. 30, 2018
Sept. 30, 2017
Sept. 30, 2018
Jun. 30, 2018
Sept. 30, 2017
Available cash
$
105.1
$
97.3
$
92.7
$
35.1
$
27.4
$
32.9
$
140.2
$
124.7
$
125.6
U.S. sovereign
102.2
101.4
108.4
29.7
28.7
26.6
131.9
130.1
135.0
U.S. agency/agency MBS
56.4
59.5
68.1
6.5
6.7
0.6
62.9
66.2
68.7
Foreign government debt
(1)
74.9
73.5
101.3
9.6
10.9
16.3
84.5
84.4
117.6
Other investment grade
0.2
0.1
0.5
1.1
1.0
1.2
1.3
1.2
1.7
Total HQLA (AVG)
$
338.8
$
331.8
$
371.0
$
82.0
$
74.8
$
77.6
$
420.8
$
406.6
$
448.6
Note: The amounts set forth in the table above are presented on an average basis and reflect HQLA held at Citigroup’s operating entities, which are eligible for inclusion in Citigroup’s consolidated HQLA. For securities, the amounts represent the liquidity value that potentially could be realized and, therefore, exclude any securities that are encumbered and incorporate any haircuts that would be required for securities financing transactions.
(1)
Foreign government debt includes securities issued or guaranteed by foreign sovereigns, agencies and multilateral development banks. Foreign government debt securities are held largely to support local liquidity requirements and Citi’s local franchises and principally include government bonds from Hong Kong, Singapore, Korea, Taiwan, India, Mexico and Brazil.
The table above includes average amounts of HQLA held at Citigroup’s operating entities that are eligible for inclusion in the calculation of Citigroup’s consolidated LCR, pursuant to the U.S. LCR rules. These amounts include the HQLA needed to meet the minimum requirements at these entities and any amounts in excess of these minimums that are assumed to be transferable to Citigroup. While available liquidity resources at operating entities generally increased, the amount of HQLA included in the table above declined year-over-year as less HQLA in the operating entities was eligible for inclusion in the consolidated metric. Sequentially, Citi’s total HQLA increased, primarily due to an increase in average cash driven by a reduction in illiquid assets and the timing of long-term debt issuance.
Citi’s HQLA as set forth above does not include Citi’s available borrowing capacity from the Federal Home Loan Banks (FHLBs) of which Citi is a member, which was approximately $29 billion as of
September 30, 2018
(compared to $21 billion as of June 30, 2018 and $16 billion as of
September 30, 2017
) and maintained by eligible collateral pledged to such banks. The HQLA also does not include Citi’s borrowing capacity at the U.S. Federal Reserve Bank discount window or other central banks, which would be in addition to the resources noted above.
In general, Citi’s liquidity is fungible across legal entities within its bank group. Citi’s bank subsidiaries, including Citibank, can lend to the Citi parent and broker-dealer entities in accordance with Section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act. As of
September 30, 2018
, the capacity available for lending to these entities under Section 23A was approximately $15 billion, unchanged from both June 30, 2018 and
September 30, 2017
, subject to certain eligible non-cash collateral requirements.
55
Loans
The table below details the average loans, by business and/or segment, and the total end-of-period loans for each of the periods indicated:
In billions of dollars
Sept. 30, 2018
Jun. 30, 2018
Sept. 30, 2017
Global Consumer Banking
North America
$
192.8
$
188.8
$
186.7
Latin America
26.3
25.5
26.8
Asia
(1)
87.7
88.8
86.2
Total
$
306.8
$
303.1
$
299.7
Institutional Clients Group
Corporate lending
$
130.9
$
135.5
$
123.3
Treasury and trade solutions (TTS)
76.9
77.7
74.9
Private bank
92.8
90.7
82.6
Markets and securities services
and other
45.6
43.0
40.1
Total
$
346.2
$
346.9
$
320.9
Total
Corporate/Other
$
17.3
$
19.7
$
25.7
Total Citigroup loans (AVG)
$
670.3
$
669.7
$
646.3
Total Citigroup loans (EOP)
$
674.9
$
671.2
$
653.2
(1)
Includes loans in certain
EMEA
countries for all periods presented.
End-of-period loans increased 3% year-over-year and 1% sequentially. On an average basis, loans increased 4% year-over-year and were largely unchanged sequentially.
Excluding the impact of FX translation, average loans increased 5% year-over-year and 6% in aggregate across
GCB
and
ICG
. Average
GCB
loans grew 3% year-over-year, driven by growth across all regions. Average
ICG
loans increased 9% year-over-year, with continued momentum across businesses, including in TTS, the private bank and corporate lending.
Average
Corporate/Other
loans continued to decline (down 34%), driven by the wind-down of legacy assets.
Deposits
The table below details the average deposits, by business and/or segment, and the total end-of-period deposits for each of the periods indicated:
In billions of dollars
Sept. 30, 2018
Jun. 30, 2018
Sept. 30, 2017
Global Consumer Banking
North America
$
180.2
$
179.9
$
184.1
Latin America
29.4
28.3
28.8
Asia
(1)
97.6
97.6
95.2
Total
$
307.2
$
305.8
$
308.1
Institutional Clients Group
Treasury and trade solutions (TTS)
$
456.7
$
448.7
$
427.8
Banking ex-TTS
124.6
125.5
122.4
Markets and securities services
86.7
88.2
84.7
Total
$
668.0
$
662.4
$
634.9
Corporate/Other
$
10.6
$
18.0
$
22.9
Total Citigroup deposits (AVG)
$
985.7
$
986.2
$
965.9
Total Citigroup deposits (EOP)
$
1,005.2
$
996.7
$
964.0
(1)
Includes deposits in certain
EMEA
countries
for all periods presented.
End-of-period deposits increased 4% year-over-year and 1% sequentially. On an average basis, deposits increased 2% year-over-year and were largely unchanged sequentially.
Excluding the impact of FX translation, average deposits grew 3% from the prior-year period. In
GCB
, deposits increased 1%, as strong growth in
Asia GCB
and
Latin America GCB
more than offset a 2% decline in
North America GCB
, primarily driven by a reduction in money market balances as clients transferred cash into investment accounts.
Within
ICG
, average deposits grew 6% year-over-year, primarily driven by continued high-quality deposit growth in TTS.
56
Long-Term Debt
The weighted-average maturity of unsecured long-term debt issued by Citigroup and its affiliates (including Citibank) with a remaining life greater than one year was approximately 6.9 years as of
September 30, 2018
, an increase from both the prior-year period (6.8 years) and the prior quarter (6.5 years).
Citi’s long-term debt outstanding at the Citigroup parent company includes senior and subordinated debt and what Citi refers to as customer-related debt, consisting of structured notes, such as equity- and credit-linked notes, as well as non-structured notes. Citi’s issuance of customer-related debt is generally driven by customer demand and supplements benchmark debt issuance as a source of funding for Citi’s non-bank entities. Citi’s long-term debt at the bank also includes benchmark senior debt, FHLB advances and securitizations.
Long-Term Debt Outstanding
The following table sets forth Citi’s end-of-period total long-term debt outstanding for each of the dates indicated:
In billions of dollars
Sept. 30, 2018
Jun. 30, 2018
Sept. 30, 2017
Parent and other
(1)
Benchmark debt:
Senior debt
$
107.2
$
107.8
$
109.8
Subordinated debt
25.1
25.3
27.0
Trust preferred
1.7
1.7
1.7
Customer-related debt
35.4
34.3
30.3
Local country and other
(2)
3.8
3.8
1.8
Total parent and other
$
173.2
$
172.9
$
170.6
Bank
FHLB borrowings
$
10.5
$
13.7
$
19.8
Securitizations
(3)
27.4
28.5
28.6
CBNA benchmark senior debt
21.0
18.5
9.5
Local country and other
(2)
3.2
3.2
4.2
Total bank
$
62.1
$
63.9
$
62.1
Total long-term debt
$
235.3
$
236.8
$
232.7
Note: Amounts represent the current value of long-term debt on Citi’s Consolidated Balance Sheet which, for certain debt instruments, includes consideration of fair value, hedging impacts and unamortized discounts and premiums.
(1)
“Parent and other” includes long-term debt issued to third parties by the parent holding company (Citigroup) and Citi’s non-bank subsidiaries (including broker-dealer subsidiaries) that are consolidated into Citigroup. As of
September 30, 2018
, “parent and other” included $25.0 billion of long-term debt issued by Citi’s broker-dealer subsidiaries.
(2)
Local country debt includes debt issued by Citi’s affiliates in support of their local operations.
(3)
Predominantly credit card securitizations, primarily backed by Citi-branded credit card receivables.
Citi’s total long-term debt outstanding increased year-over-year, primarily driven by the issuance of unsecured benchmark debt at the bank and customer-related debt at the Citigroup parent company, partially offset by declines in FHLB advances and senior unsecured benchmark debt at the parent company. Sequentially, Citi’s total long-term debt outstanding decreased modestly, primarily driven by a decline in FHLB advances, partially offset by the issuance of unsecured benchmark debt at the bank.
As part of its liability management, Citi has considered, and may continue to consider, opportunities to repurchase its long-term debt pursuant to open market purchases, tender offers or other means. Such repurchases help reduce Citi’s overall funding costs and assist it in meeting regulatory changes and requirements. During the
third
quarter of 2018, Citi repurchased and called an aggregate of approximately $1.2 billion of its outstanding long-term debt, including early redemption of FHLB advances.
57
Long-Term Debt Issuances and Maturities
The table below details Citi’s long-term debt issuances and maturities (including repurchases and redemptions) during the periods presented:
3Q18
2Q18
3Q17
In billions of dollars
Maturities
Issuances
Maturities
Issuances
Maturities
Issuances
Parent and other
Benchmark debt:
Senior debt
$
4.2
$
4.5
$
7.2
$
4.9
$
2.5
$
5.7
Subordinated debt
—
—
0.3
0.3
—
—
Trust preferred
—
—
—
—
—
—
Customer-related debt
1.2
2.9
1.5
4.7
1.8
3.0
Local country and other
0.3
0.1
0.2
2.1
0.4
—
Total parent and other
$
5.7
$
7.6
$
9.1
$
12.0
$
4.7
$
8.7
Bank
FHLB borrowings
$
3.3
$
—
$
4.5
$
2.5
$
1.5
$
1.0
Securitizations
2.9
1.9
2.7
1.1
1.8
2.2
CBNA benchmark senior debt
—
2.5
—
3.5
—
2.2
Local country and other
0.2
0.3
0.9
0.9
0.5
0.5
Total bank
$
6.4
$
4.7
$
8.1
$
8.0
$
3.8
$
5.9
Total
$
12.1
$
12.3
$
17.2
$
20.0
$
8.5
$
14.6
The table below shows Citi’s aggregate long-term debt maturities (including repurchases and redemptions) year-to-date in 2018, as well as its aggregate expected annual long-term debt maturities as of
September 30, 2018
:
Maturities 2018 YTD
Maturities
In billions of dollars
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Thereafter
Total
Parent and other
Benchmark debt:
Senior debt
$
14.9
$
3.5
$
14.3
$
8.7
$
14.2
$
8.0
$
12.4
$
46.1
$
107.2
Subordinated debt
1.8
1.0
—
—
—
0.7
1.1
22.3
$
25.1
Trust preferred
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1.7
1.7
Customer-related debt
5.2
0.9
3.7
5.7
3.2
2.6
2.5
16.8
35.4
Local country and other
0.5
2.2
0.4
0.1
0.4
—
—
0.7
3.8
Total parent and other
$
22.4
$
7.6
$
18.4
$
14.5
$
17.8
$
11.3
$
16.0
$
87.6
$
173.2
Bank
FHLB borrowings
$
14.3
$
1.5
$
5.6
$
3.4
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
10.5
Securitizations
8.5
0.1
7.9
6.1
5.7
2.2
2.5
2.9
27.4
CBNA benchmark debt
—
2.2
4.7
8.7
5.0
—
—
0.4
21.0
Local country and other
2.0
0.1
0.5
1.7
0.1
0.3
0.2
0.3
3.2
Total bank
$
24.8
$
3.9
$
18.7
$
19.9
$
10.8
$
2.5
$
2.7
$
3.6
$
62.1
Total long-term debt
$
47.2
$
11.5
$
37.1
$
34.4
$
28.6
$
13.8
$
18.7
$
91.2
$
235.3
58
Secured Funding Transactions and Short-Term Borrowings
Citi supplements its primary sources of funding with short-term borrowings. Short-term borrowings generally include (i) secured funding transactions (securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase, or repos) and (ii) to a lesser extent, short-term borrowings consisting of commercial paper and borrowings from the FHLB and other market participants (see Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on Citigroup’s and its affiliates’ outstanding short-term borrowings).
Outside of secured funding transactions, Citi’s short-term borrowings decreased 11% year-over-year and 9% sequentially, driven primarily by Citi’s continued efforts to optimize its funding profile.
Secured Funding
Secured funding is primarily accessed through Citi’s broker-dealer subsidiaries to fund efficiently both secured lending activity and a portion of the securities inventory held in the context of market making and customer activities. Citi also executes a smaller portion of its secured funding transactions through its bank entities, which is typically collateralized by foreign government debt securities. Generally, daily changes in the level of Citi’s secured funding are primarily due to fluctuations in secured lending activity in the matched book (as described below) and securities inventory.
Secured funding of $176 billion as of September 30, 2018 increased 9% from the prior-year period and declined 1% sequentially. Excluding the impact of FX translation, secured funding increased 11% from the prior-year period and declined 1% sequentially,
both driven by normal business activity. Average balances for secured funding were also approximately $176 billion for the quarter ended
September 30, 2018
.
The portion of secured funding in the broker-dealer subsidiaries that funds secured lending is commonly referred to as “matched book” activity. The majority of this activity is secured by high-quality liquid securities such as U.S. Treasury securities, U.S. agency securities and foreign government debt securities. Other secured funding is secured by less-liquid securities, including equity securities, corporate bonds and asset-backed securities. The tenor of Citi’s matched book liabilities is generally equal to or longer than the tenor of the corresponding matched book assets.
The remainder of the secured funding activity in the broker-dealer subsidiaries serves to fund securities inventory held in the context of market making and customer activities. To maintain reliable funding under a wide range of market conditions, including under periods of stress, Citi manages these activities by taking into consideration the quality of the underlying collateral and stipulating financing tenor. The weighted average maturity of Citi’s secured funding of less-liquid securities inventory was greater than 110 days as of
September 30, 2018
.
Citi manages the risks in its secured funding by conducting daily stress tests to account for changes in capacity, tenors, haircut, collateral profile and client actions. Additionally, Citi maintains counterparty diversification by
establishing concentration triggers and assessing counterparty reliability and stability under stress. Citi generally sources secured funding from more than 150 counterparties.
Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR)
In addition to internal liquidity stress metrics that Citi has developed for a 30-day stress scenario, Citi also monitors its liquidity by reference to the LCR, as calculated pursuant to the U.S. LCR rules. The table below sets forth the components of Citi’s LCR calculation and HQLA in excess of net outflows for the periods indicated:
In billions of dollars
Sept. 30, 2018
Jun. 30, 2018
Sept. 30, 2017
HQLA
$
420.8
$
406.6
$
448.6
Net outflows
350.8
341.5
365.1
LCR
120
%
119
%
123
%
HQLA in excess of net outflows
$70.0
$
65.1
$
83.5
Note: The amounts are presented on an average basis.
Citi’s average LCR decreased year-over-year, driven by a decline in average HQLA, partially offset by a decline in modeled net outflows. Sequentially, Citi’s average LCR increased slightly, due to the increase in HQLA, as described above (see “High-Quality Liquid Assets” above), partially offset by an increase in modeled net outflows.
59
Credit Ratings
The table below sets forth the ratings for Citigroup and Citibank as of
September 30, 2018
. While not included in the table below, the long- and short-term ratings of Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc. (CGMHI) were BBB+/A-2 at Standard & Poor’s and A/F1 at Fitch as of
September 30, 2018
.
Citigroup Inc.
Citibank, N.A.
Senior
debt
Commercial
paper
Outlook
Long-
term
Short-
term
Outlook
Fitch Ratings (Fitch)
A
F1
Stable
A+
F1
Stable
Moody’s Investors Service (Moody’s)
Baa1
P-2
Positive
A1
P-1
Positive
Standard & Poor’s (S&P)
BBB+
A-2
Stable
A+
A-1
Stable
Potential Impacts of Ratings Downgrades
Ratings downgrades by Moody’s, Fitch or S&P could negatively impact Citigroup’s and/or Citibank’s funding and liquidity due to reduced funding capacity, including derivative triggers, which could take the form of cash obligations and collateral requirements.
The following information is provided for the purpose of analyzing the potential funding and liquidity impact to Citigroup and Citibank of a hypothetical, simultaneous
ratings downgrade across all three major rating agencies. This analysis is subject to certain estimates, estimation methodologies, judgments and uncertainties. Uncertainties include potential ratings limitations that certain entities may have with respect to permissible counterparties, as well as general subjective counterparty behavior. For example, certain corporate customers and markets counterparties could re-evaluate their business relationships with Citi and limit transactions in certain contracts or market instruments with Citi. Changes in counterparty behavior could impact Citi’s funding and liquidity, as well as the results of operations of certain of its businesses. The actual impact to Citigroup or Citibank is unpredictable and may differ materially from the potential funding and liquidity impacts described below. For additional information on the impact of credit rating changes on Citi and its applicable subsidiaries, see “Risk Factors— Liquidity Risks” in Citi’s
2017
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Citigroup Inc. and Citibank—Potential Derivative Triggers
As of
September 30, 2018
, Citi estimates that a hypothetical one-notch downgrade of the senior debt/long-term rating of Citigroup Inc. across all three major rating agencies could impact Citigroup’s funding and liquidity due to derivative triggers by approximately $0.4 billion, unchanged from June 30, 2018. Other funding sources, such as secured financing transactions and other margin requirements, for which there are no explicit triggers, could also be adversely affected.
As of
September 30, 2018
, Citi estimates that a hypothetical one-notch downgrade of the senior debt/long-term rating of Citibank across all three major rating agencies could impact Citibank’s funding and liquidity by approximately $1.2 billion, compared to $0.9 billion as of June 30, 2018.
In total, Citi estimates that a one-notch downgrade of Citigroup and Citibank, across all three major rating agencies, could result in increased aggregate cash obligations and collateral requirements of approximately $1.6 billion, compared to $1.2 billion as of June 30, 2018 (see also Note 19 to the Consolidated Financial Statements). As detailed under “High-Quality Liquid Assets” above, the liquidity resources that are eligible for inclusion in the calculation of Citi’s consolidated HQLA were approximately $339 billion for Citibank and $82 billion for Citi’s non-bank and other entities, for a total of approximately $421 billion for the quarter ended
September 30, 2018
. These liquidity resources are available in part as a contingency for the potential events described above.
In addition, a broad range of mitigating actions are currently included in Citigroup’s and Citibank’s contingency funding plans. For Citigroup, these mitigating factors include, but are not limited to, accessing surplus funding capacity from existing clients, tailoring levels of secured lending and adjusting the size of select trading books and collateralized borrowings from certain Citibank subsidiaries. Mitigating actions available to Citibank include, but are not limited to, selling or financing highly liquid government securities, tailoring levels of secured lending, adjusting the size of select trading assets, reducing loan originations and renewals, raising additional deposits or borrowing from the FHLB or central banks. Citi believes these mitigating actions could
60
substantially reduce the funding and liquidity risk, if any, of the potential downgrades described above.
Citibank—Additional Potential Impacts
In addition to the above derivative triggers, Citi believes that a potential one-notch downgrade of Citibank’s senior debt/long-term rating by S&P could also have an adverse impact on the commercial paper/short-term rating of Citibank. As of
September 30, 2018
, Citibank had liquidity commitments of approximately $12.1 billion to consolidated asset-backed commercial paper conduits, compared to $12.0 billion as of June 30, 2018 (as referenced in Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).
In addition to the above-referenced liquidity resources of certain Citibank entities, Citibank could reduce the funding and liquidity risk, if any, of the potential downgrades described above through mitigating actions, including repricing or reducing certain commitments to commercial paper conduits. In the event of the potential downgrades described above, Citi believes that certain corporate customers could re-evaluate their deposit relationships with Citibank. This re-evaluation could result in clients adjusting their discretionary deposit levels or changing their depository institution, which could potentially reduce certain deposit levels at Citibank. However, Citi could choose to adjust pricing, offer alternative deposit products to its existing customers or seek to attract deposits from new customers, in addition to the mitigating actions referenced above.
61
MARKET RISK
Market risk emanates from both Citi’s trading and non-trading portfolios. For additional information on market risk and market risk management at Citi, see “Market Risk” and “Risk Factors” in Citi’s
2017
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Market Risk of Non-Trading Portfolios
For additional information on Citi’s net interest revenue (for interest rate exposure purposes), interest rate risk and interest rate risk measurement, see “Market Risk of Non-Trading Portfolios” in Citi’s
2017
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The following table sets forth the estimated impact to Citi’s net interest revenue, AOCI and the Common Equity Tier 1 Capital ratio (on a fully implemented basis), each assuming an unanticipated parallel instantaneous 100 basis point (bps) increase in interest rates:
In millions of dollars (unless otherwise noted)
Sept. 30, 2018
Jun. 30, 2018
Sept. 30, 2017
Estimated annualized impact to net interest revenue
U.S. dollar
(1)
$
879
$
1,046
$
1,449
All other currencies
649
635
610
Total
$
1,528
$
1,681
$
2,059
As a percentage of average interest-earning assets
0.09
%
0.10
%
0.12
%
Estimated initial impact to AOCI (after-tax)
(2)
$
(4,597
)
$
(4,713
)
$
(4,206
)
Estimated initial impact on Common Equity Tier 1 Capital ratio (bps)
(3)
(31
)
(32
)
(48
)
(1)
Certain trading-oriented businesses within Citi have accrual-accounted positions that are excluded from the estimated impact to net interest revenue in the table, since these exposures are managed economically in combination with mark-to-market positions. The U.S. dollar interest rate exposure associated with these businesses was $(212) million for a 100 bps instantaneous increase in interest rates as of
September 30, 2018
.
(2)
Includes the effect of changes in interest rates on AOCI related to investment securities, cash flow hedges and pension liability adjustments.
(3)
Results as of September 30, 2018 and June 30, 2018 reflect the impact of Tax Reform, including the lower expected effective tax rate and the impact to Citi’s DTA position. Results as of September 30, 2017 have not been restated.
The estimated impact to net interest revenue decreased on a sequential basis, reflecting changes in balance sheet composition, including increased sensitivity in deposits combined with loan growth and other actions. The decrease in the estimated impact to AOCI primarily reflected changes to the positioning of Citi Treasury’s investment securities and related interest rate derivatives portfolio.
In the event of an unanticipated parallel instantaneous 100 bps increase in interest rates, Citi expects that the negative impact to AOCI would be offset in stockholders’ equity through the combination of expected incremental net interest revenue and the expected recovery of the impact on AOCI through accretion of Citi’s investment portfolio over a period of time. As of
September 30, 2018
, Citi expects that the negative $4.6 billion impact to AOCI in such a scenario could potentially be offset over approximately 19 months.
The following table sets forth the estimated impact to Citi’s net interest revenue, AOCI and the Common Equity Tier 1 Capital ratio (on a fully implemented basis) under four different changes in interest rate scenarios for the U.S. dollar and Citi’s other currencies. While Citi also monitors the impact of a parallel decrease in interest rates, a 100 bps decrease in short-term rates is not meaningful, as it would imply negative interest rates in many of Citi's markets.
In millions of dollars (unless otherwise noted)
Scenario 1
Scenario 2
Scenario 3
Scenario 4
Overnight rate change (bps)
100
100
—
—
10-year rate change (bps)
100
—
100
(100
)
Estimated annualized impact to net interest revenue
U.S. dollar
$
879
$
906
$
47
$
(56
)
All other currencies
649
617
37
(37
)
Total
$
1,528
$
1,523
$
84
$
(93
)
Estimated initial impact to AOCI (after-tax)
(1)
$
(4,597
)
$
(2,547
)
$
(2,279
)
$
1,772
Estimated initial impact to Common Equity Tier 1 Capital ratio (bps)
(31
)
(17
)
(16
)
12
Note: Each scenario assumes that the rate change will occur instantaneously. Changes in interest rates for maturities between the overnight rate and the 10-year rate are interpolated.
(1)
Includes the effect of changes in interest rates on AOCI related to investment securities, cash flow hedges and pension liability adjustments.
62
As shown in the table above, the magnitude of the impact to Citi’s net interest revenue and AOCI is greater under scenario 2 as compared to scenario 3. This is because the combination of changes to Citi’s investment portfolio, partially offset by changes related to Citi’s pension liabilities, results in a net position that is more sensitive to rates at shorter- and intermediate-term maturities.
In recent years, a number of central banks, including the European Central Bank, the Bank of Japan and the Swiss National Bank, have implemented negative interest rates, and additional governmental entities could do so in the future. While negative interest rates can adversely impact net interest revenue (as well as net interest margin), Citi has, to date, been able to partially offset the impact of negative rates in these jurisdictions through a combination of business and Citi Treasury interest rate risk mitigation activities, including applying negative rates to client accounts (for additional information on Citi Treasury’s ongoing interest rate mitigation activities, see “Market Risk—Market Risk of Non-Trading Portfolios” in Citi’s 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K).
Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates—Impacts on AOCI and Capital
As of
September 30, 2018
, Citi estimates that an unanticipated parallel instantaneous 5% appreciation of the U.S. dollar against all of the other currencies in which Citi has invested capital could reduce Citi’s tangible common equity (TCE) by approximately $1.4 billion, or 0.9%, as a result of changes to Citi’s foreign currency translation adjustment in AOCI, net of hedges. This impact would be primarily due to changes in the value of the Mexican peso, the Euro and the Australian dollar.
This impact is also before any mitigating actions Citi may take, including ongoing management of its foreign currency translation exposure. Specifically, as currency movements change the value of Citi’s net investments in foreign currency-denominated capital, these movements also change the value of Citi’s risk-weighted assets denominated in those currencies. This, coupled with Citi’s foreign currency hedging strategies, such as foreign currency borrowings, foreign currency forwards and other currency hedging instruments, lessens the impact of foreign currency movements on Citi’s Common Equity Tier 1 Capital ratio. Changes in these hedging strategies, as well as hedging costs, divestitures and tax impacts, can further affect the actual impact of changes in foreign exchange rates on Citi’s capital as compared to an unanticipated parallel shock, as described above.
The effect of Citi’s ongoing management strategies with respect to changes in foreign exchange rates and the impact of these changes on Citi’s TCE and Common Equity Tier 1 Capital ratio are shown in the table below. For additional information on the changes in AOCI, see Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
For the quarter ended
In millions of dollars (unless otherwise noted)
Sept. 30, 2018
Jun. 30, 2018
Sept. 30, 2017
Change in FX spot rate
(1)
(0.2
)%
(5.8
)%
1.1
%
Change in TCE due to FX translation, net of hedges
$
(354
)
$
(2,241
)
$
222
As a percentage of TCE
(0.2
)%
(1.5
)%
0.1
%
Estimated impact to Common Equity Tier 1 Capital ratio (on a fully implemented basis) due
to changes in FX translation, net of hedges (bps)
—
—
(3
)
(1)
FX spot rate change is a weighted average based upon Citi’s quarterly average GAAP capital exposure to foreign countries.
63
Interest Revenue/Expense and Net Interest Margin
3rd Qtr.
2nd Qtr.
3rd Qtr.
Change
In millions of dollars, except as otherwise noted
2018
2018
2017
3Q18 vs. 3Q17
Interest revenue
(1)
$
18,228
$
17,613
$
16,037
14
%
Interest expense
(2)
6,368
5,885
4,379
45
Net interest revenue
$
11,860
$
11,728
$
11,658
2
%
Interest revenue—average rate
4.15
%
4.05
%
3.77
%
38
bps
Interest expense—average rate
1.83
1.73
1.33
50
bps
Net interest margin
(3)
2.70
2.70
2.74
(4
)
bps
Interest-rate benchmarks
Two-year U.S. Treasury note—average rate
2.67
%
2.48
%
1.36
%
131
bps
10-year U.S. Treasury note—average rate
2.92
2.92
2.24
68
bps
10-year vs. two-year spread
25
bps
44
bps
88
bps
Note: All interest expense amounts include FDIC, as well as other similar deposit insurance assessments outside of the U.S.
(1)
Net interest revenue
includes the taxable equivalent adjustments related to the tax-exempt bond portfolio (based on the U.S. federal statutory tax rates of 21% in 2018 and 35% in 2017) of $58 million, $63 million and $123 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2018
,
June 30, 2018
and
September 30, 2017
, respectively.
(2)
Interest expense associated with certain hybrid financial instruments, which are classified as
Long-term debt
and accounted for at fair value, is reported together with any changes in fair value as part of
Principal transactions
in the Consolidated Statements of Income and is therefore not reflected in
Interest expense
in the table above.
(3)
Citi’s net interest margin (NIM) is calculated by dividing gross interest revenue less gross interest expense by average interest-earning assets.
Citi’s net interest revenue in the third quarter of 2018 increased 2% to $11.9 billion (as set forth in the table above, also up 2% on a taxable equivalent basis) versus the prior-year period. Excluding the impact of FX translation, net interest revenue increased 5%, or approximately $520 million. This increase was primarily due to higher net interest revenue ($11.3 billion, up approximately 9% or $1.0 billion) from Citi’s core accrual activities, which are mainly driven by its deposit and lending businesses. The increase in core accrual net interest revenue was partially offset by lower trading-related net interest revenue ($0.4 billion, down approximately 47% or $0.3 billion) and lower net interest revenue associated with the wind-down of legacy assets in
Corporate/Other
($0.2
billion, down approximately 45% or $0.1 billion). The increase in the core accrual net interest revenue was driven mainly by higher interest rates, loan growth and an improved loan mix.
Citi’s NIM was 2.70% on a taxable equivalent basis in the
third
quarter of 2018, a decrease of 4 bps from the prior- year period, driven primarily by lower trading-related NIM. Citi’s core accrual NIM was 3.60%, an increase of 12 bps versus the prior-year period, primarily driven by higher interest rates, loan growth and an improved loan mix. (Citi’s core accrual net interest revenue and core accrual NIM are non-GAAP financial measures.)
64
Additional Interest Rate Details
Average Balances and Interest Rates—Assets
(1)(2)(3)
Taxable Equivalent Basis
Average volume
Interest revenue
% Average rate
3rd Qtr.
2nd Qtr.
3rd Qtr.
3rd Qtr.
2nd Qtr.
3rd Qtr.
3rd Qtr.
2nd Qtr.
3rd Qtr.
In millions of dollars, except rates
2018
2018
2017
2018
2018
2017
2018
2018
2017
Assets
Deposits with banks
(4)
$
186,907
$
176,151
$
176,942
$
629
$
493
$
486
1.34
%
1.12
%
1.09
%
Federal funds sold and securities
borrowed or purchased under
agreements to resell
(5)
In U.S. offices
$
154,120
$
153,273
$
136,681
$
1,065
$
838
$
524
2.74
%
2.19
%
1.52
%
In offices outside the U.S.
(4)
114,389
118,098
108,770
360
498
334
1.25
1.69
1.22
Total
$
268,509
$
271,371
$
245,451
$
1,425
$
1,336
$
858
2.11
%
1.97
%
1.39
%
Trading account assets
(6)(7)
In U.S. offices
$
92,034
$
92,791
$
98,725
$
1,048
$
851
$
918
4.52
%
3.68
%
3.69
%
In offices outside the U.S.
(4)
112,979
117,840
105,882
614
922
555
2.16
3.14
2.08
Total
$
205,013
$
210,631
$
204,607
$
1,662
$
1,773
$
1,473
3.22
%
3.38
%
2.86
%
Investments
In U.S. offices
Taxable
$
227,282
$
225,886
$
227,680
$
1,343
$
1,315
$
1,138
2.34
%
2.34
%
1.98
%
Exempt from U.S. income tax
17,088
17,339
17,890
175
180
181
4.06
4.16
4.01
In offices outside the U.S.
(4)
103,120
104,562
106,456
903
913
835
3.47
3.50
3.11
Total
$
347,490
$
347,787
$
352,026
$
2,421
$
2,408
$
2,154
2.76
%
2.78
%
2.43
%
Loans (net of unearned income)
(8)
In U.S. offices
$
385,610
$
382,972
$
372,067
$
7,331
$
6,958
$
6,650
7.54
%
7.29
%
7.09
%
In offices outside the U.S.
(4)
284,663
286,772
274,254
4,326
4,251
4,124
6.03
5.95
5.97
Total
$
670,273
$
669,744
$
646,321
$
11,657
$
11,209
$
10,774
6.90
%
6.71
%
6.61
%
Other interest-earning assets
(9)
$
63,741
$
69,341
$
61,677
$
434
$
394
$
292
2.70
%
2.28
%
1.88
%
Total interest-earning assets
$
1,741,933
$
1,745,025
$
1,687,024
$
18,228
$
17,613
$
16,037
4.15
%
4.05
%
3.77
%
Non-interest-earning assets
(6)
$
180,871
$
172,077
$
205,268
Total assets
$
1,922,804
$
1,917,102
$
1,892,292
(1)
Net interest revenue
includes the taxable equivalent adjustments related to the tax-exempt bond portfolio (based on the U.S. federal statutory tax rates of 21% in 2018 and 35% in 2017) of $58 million, $63 million and $123 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2018
,
June 30, 2018
and
September 30, 2017
, respectively.
(2)
Interest rates and amounts include the effects of risk management activities associated with the respective asset categories.
(3)
Monthly or quarterly averages have been used by certain subsidiaries where daily averages are unavailable.
(4)
Average rates reflect prevailing local interest rates, including inflationary effects and monetary corrections in certain countries.
(5)
Average volumes of securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell are reported net pursuant to ASC 210-20-45. However,
Interest revenue
excludes the impact of ASC 210-20-45.
(6)
The fair value carrying amounts of derivative contracts are reported net, pursuant to ASC 815-10-45, in
Non-interest-earning assets
and
Other non-interest-bearing liabilities
.
(7)
Interest expense
on
Trading account liabilities
of
ICG
is reported as a reduction of
Interest revenue
.
Interest revenue
and
Interest expense
on cash collateral positions are reported in interest on
Trading account assets
and
Trading account liabilities
, respectively.
(8)
Includes cash-basis loans.
(9)
Includes brokerage receivables.
65
Average Balances and Interest Rates—Liabilities and Equity, and Net Interest Revenue
(1)(2)(3)
Taxable Equivalent Basis
Average volume
Interest expense
% Average rate
3rd Qtr.
2nd Qtr.
3rd Qtr.
3rd Qtr.
2nd Qtr.
3rd Qtr.
3rd Qtr.
2nd Qtr.
3rd Qtr.
In millions of dollars, except rates
2018
2018
2017
2018
2018
2017
2018
2018
2017
Liabilities
Deposits
In U.S. offices
(4)
$
341,679
$
332,595
$
318,881
$
1,231
$
1,041
$
695
1.43
%
1.26
%
0.86
%
In offices outside the U.S.
(5)
452,197
453,025
438,561
1,349
1,203
1,080
1.18
1.07
0.98
Total
$
793,876
$
785,620
$
757,442
$
2,580
$
2,244
$
1,775
1.29
%
1.15
%
0.93
%
Federal funds purchased and
securities loaned or sold under
agreements to repurchase
(6)
In U.S. offices
$
105,194
$
102,517
$
93,167
$
872
$
796
$
423
3.29
%
3.11
%
1.80
%
In offices outside the U.S.
(5)
70,638
68,556
64,897
378
428
289
2.12
2.50
1.77
Total
$
175,832
$
171,073
$
158,064
$
1,250
$
1,224
$
712
2.82
%
2.87
%
1.79
%
Trading account liabilities
(7)(8)
In U.S. offices
$
38,385
$
36,103
$
32,622
$
167
$
140
$
104
1.73
%
1.56
%
1.26
%
In offices outside the U.S.
(5)
57,746
61,048
57,187
106
96
65
0.73
0.63
0.45
Total
$
96,131
$
97,151
$
89,809
$
273
$
236
$
169
1.13
%
0.97
%
0.75
%
Short-term borrowings
(9)
In U.S. offices
$
85,592
$
84,338
$
77,211
$
502
$
439
$
234
2.33
%
2.09
%
1.20
%
In offices outside the U.S.
(5)
22,579
23,854
20,928
76
84
84
1.34
1.41
1.59
Total
$
108,171
$
108,192
$
98,139
$
578
$
523
$
318
2.12
%
1.94
%
1.29
%
Long-term debt
(10)
In U.S. offices
$
200,199
$
198,291
$
198,766
$
1,647
$
1,620
$
1,377
3.26
%
3.28
%
2.75
%
In offices outside the U.S.
(5)
5,390
4,980
4,298
40
38
28
2.94
3.06
2.58
Total
$
205,589
$
203,271
$
203,064
$
1,687
$
1,658
$
1,405
3.26
%
3.27
%
2.75
%
Total interest-bearing liabilities
$
1,379,599
$
1,365,307
$
1,306,518
$
6,368
$
5,885
$
4,379
1.83
%
1.73
%
1.33
%
Demand deposits in U.S. offices
$
31,697
$
33,737
$
37,673
Other non-interest-bearing liabilities
(7)
312,174
316,907
318,060
Total liabilities
$
1,723,470
$
1,715,951
$
1,662,251
Citigroup stockholders’ equity
$
198,494
$
200,295
$
229,017
Noncontrolling interest
840
856
1,024
Total equity
$
199,334
$
201,151
$
230,041
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
$
1,922,804
$
1,917,102
$
1,892,292
Net interest revenue as a percentage of average interest-earning assets
(11)
In U.S. offices
$
1,005,236
$
983,786
$
975,283
$
7,307
$
6,710
$
7,046
2.88
%
2.74
%
2.87
%
In offices outside the U.S.
(6)
736,697
761,239
711,741
4,553
5,018
4,612
2.45
2.64
2.57
Total
$
1,741,933
$
1,745,025
$
1,687,024
$
11,860
$
11,728
$
11,658
2.70
%
2.70
%
2.74
%
(1)
Net interest revenue
includes the taxable equivalent adjustments related to the tax-exempt bond portfolio (based on the U.S. federal statutory tax rates of 21% in 2018 and 35% in 2017) of $58 million, $63 million and $123 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2018
,
June 30, 2018
and
September 30, 2017
, respectively.
(2)
Interest rates and amounts include the effects of risk management activities associated with the respective liability categories.
(3)
Monthly or quarterly averages have been used by certain subsidiaries where daily averages are unavailable.
(4)
Consists of other time deposits and savings deposits. Savings deposits are made up of insured money market accounts, NOW accounts and other savings deposits. The interest expense on savings deposits includes FDIC deposit insurance assessments.
(5)
Average rates reflect prevailing local interest rates, including inflationary effects and monetary corrections in certain countries.
(6)
Average volumes of securities sold under agreements to repurchase are reported net pursuant to ASC 210-20-45. However,
Interest expense
excludes the impact of ASC 210-20-45.
(7)
The fair value carrying amounts of derivative contracts are reported net, pursuant to ASC 815-10-45, in
Non-interest-earning assets
and
Other non-interest-bearing liabilities
.
66
(8)
Interest expense
on
Trading account liabilities
of
ICG
is reported as a reduction of
Interest revenue
.
Interest revenue
and
Interest expense
on cash collateral positions are reported in interest on
Trading account assets
and
Trading account liabilities
, respectively.
(9)
Includes brokerage payables.
(10)
Excludes hybrid financial instruments and beneficial interests in consolidated VIEs that are classified as
Long-term debt
, as the changes in fair value for these obligations are recorded in
Principal transactions
.
(11)
Includes allocations for capital and funding costs based on the location of the asset.
Average Balances and Interest Rates—Assets
(1)(2)(3)(4)
Taxable Equivalent Basis
Average volume
Interest revenue
% Average rate
Nine Months
Nine Months
Nine Months
Nine Months
Nine Months
Nine Months
In millions of dollars, except rates
2018
2017
2018
2017
2018
2017
Assets
Deposits with banks
(5)
$
177,975
$
165,910
$
1,554
$
1,156
1.17
%
0.93
%
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell
(6)
In U.S. offices
$
149,251
$
141,723
$
2,616
$
1,364
2.34
%
1.29
%
In offices outside the U.S.
(5)
115,469
105,527
1,184
984
1.37
1.25
Total
$
264,720
$
247,250
$
3,800
$
2,348
1.92
%
1.27
%
Trading account assets
(7)(8)
In U.S. offices
$
94,128
$
100,214
$
2,768
$
2,679
3.93
%
3.57
%
In offices outside the U.S.
(5)
116,474
101,159
2,048
1,624
2.35
2.15
Total
$
210,602
$
201,373
$
4,816
$
4,303
3.06
%
2.86
%
Investments
In U.S. offices
Taxable
$
227,525
$
224,384
$
3,882
$
3,258
2.28
%
1.94
%
Exempt from U.S. income tax
17,319
18,345
525
574
4.05
4.18
In offices outside the U.S.
(5)
104,330
106,813
2,693
2,454
3.45
3.07
Total
$
349,174
$
349,542
$
7,100
$
6,286
2.72
%
2.40
%
Loans (net of unearned income)
(9)
In U.S. offices
$
382,980
$
369,602
$
21,021
$
19,316
7.34
%
6.99
%
In offices outside the U.S.
(5)
286,334
265,060
12,754
11,844
5.96
5.97
Total
$
669,314
$
634,662
$
33,775
$
31,160
6.75
%
6.56
%
Other interest-earning assets
(10)
$
66,614
$
59,506
$
1,192
$
846
2.39
%
1.90
%
Total interest-earning assets
$
1,738,399
$
1,658,243
$
52,237
$
46,099
4.02
%
3.72
%
Non-interest-earning assets
(7)
$
176,312
$
205,775
Total assets
$
1,914,711
$
1,864,018
(1)
Net interest
revenue
includes the taxable equivalent adjustments (based on the U.S. federal statutory tax rates of 21% in 2018 and 35% in 2017) of $185 million and $370 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2018
and
2017
, respectively.
(2)
Interest rates and amounts include the effects of risk management activities associated with the respective asset and liability categories.
(3)
Monthly or quarterly averages have been used by certain subsidiaries where daily averages are unavailable.
(4)
Detailed average volume,
Interest revenue
and
Interest expense
exclude
Discontinued operations
. See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(5)
Average rates reflect prevailing local interest rates, including inflationary effects and monetary corrections in certain countries.
(6)
Average volumes of securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell are reported net pursuant to FIN 41 (ASC 210-20-45). However,
Interest revenue
excludes the impact of FIN 41 (ASC 210-20-45).
(7)
The fair value carrying amounts of derivative contracts are reported in
Non-interest-earning assets
and
Other non-interest-bearing liabilities
.
(8)
Interest expense
on
Trading account liabilities
of
ICG
is reported as a reduction of
Interest revenue
.
Interest revenue
and
Interest expense
on cash collateral positions are reported in interest on
Trading account assets
and
Trading account liabilities
, respectively.
(9)
Includes cash-basis loans.
(10)
Includes brokerage receivables.
67
Average Balances and Interest Rates—Liabilities and Equity, and Net Interest Revenue
(1)(2)(3)(4)
Taxable Equivalent Basis
Average volume
Interest expense
% Average rate
Nine Months
Nine Months
Nine Months
Nine Months
Nine Months
Nine Months
In millions of dollars, except rates
2018
2017
2018
2017
2018
2017
Liabilities
Deposits
In U.S. offices
(5)
$
332,542
$
310,977
$
3,169
$
1,795
1.27
%
0.77
%
In offices outside the U.S.
(6)
450,546
435,704
3,652
2,998
1.08
0.92
Total
$
783,088
$
746,681
$
6,821
$
4,793
1.16
%
0.86
%
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned
or sold under agreements to repurchase
(7)
In U.S. offices
$
102,242
$
96,417
$
2,272
$
1,101
2.97
%
1.53
%
In offices outside the U.S.
(6)
68,215
59,559
1,151
780
2.26
1.75
Total
$
170,457
$
155,976
$
3,423
$
1,881
2.68
%
1.61
%
Trading account liabilities
(8)(9)
In U.S. offices
$
36,161
$
33,041
$
434
$
269
1.60
%
1.09
%
In offices outside the U.S.
(6)
58,840
57,862
290
193
0.66
0.45
Total
$
95,001
$
90,903
$
724
$
462
1.02
%
0.68
%
Short-term borrowings
(10)
In U.S. offices
$
86,377
$
72,435
$
1,330
$
422
2.06
%
0.78
%
In offices outside the U.S.
(6)
23,305
22,668
242
297
1.39
1.75
Total
$
109,682
$
95,103
$
1,572
$
719
1.92
%
1.01
%
Long-term debt
(11)
In U.S. offices
$
199,471
$
188,344
$
4,749
$
3,993
3.18
%
2.83
%
In offices outside the U.S.
(6)
4,908
4,715
124
133
3.38
3.77
Total
$
204,379
$
193,059
$
4,873
$
4,126
3.19
%
2.86
%
Total interest-bearing liabilities
$
1,362,607
$
1,281,722
$
17,413
$
11,981
1.71
%
1.25
%
Demand deposits in U.S. offices
$
33,654
$
38,064
Other non-interest-bearing liabilities
(8)
317,697
313,605
Total liabilities
$
1,713,958
$
1,633,391
Citigroup stockholders’ equity
(12)
$
199,874
$
229,618
Noncontrolling interest
879
1,009
Total equity
(12)
$
200,753
$
230,627
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
$
1,914,711
$
1,864,018
Net interest revenue as a percentage of average interest-earning assets
In U.S. offices
$
987,592
$
963,789
$
20,734
$
20,588
2.81
%
2.86
%
In offices outside the U.S.
(6)
750,807
694,454
14,090
13,530
2.51
2.60
Total
$
1,738,399
$
1,658,243
$
34,824
$
34,118
2.68
%
2.75
%
(1)
Net interest
revenue
includes the taxable equivalent adjustments (based on the U.S. federal statutory tax rates of 21% in 2018 and 35% in 2017) of $185 million and $370 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2018
and
2017
, respectively.
(2)
Interest rates and amounts include the effects of risk management activities associated with the respective asset and liability categories.
(3)
Monthly or quarterly averages have been used by certain subsidiaries where daily averages are unavailable.
(4)
Detailed average volume,
Interest revenue
and
Interest expense
exclude
Discontinued operations
. See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(5)
Consists of other time deposits and savings deposits. Savings deposits are made up of insured money market accounts, NOW accounts and other savings deposits. The interest expense on savings deposits includes FDIC deposit insurance fees and charges.
(6)
Average rates reflect prevailing local interest rates, including inflationary effects and monetary corrections in certain countries.
(7)
Average volumes of securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase are reported net pursuant to FIN 41 (ASC 210-20-45). However,
Interest expense
excludes the impact of FIN 41 (ASC 210-20-45).
(8)
The fair value carrying amounts of derivative contracts are reported in
Non-interest-earning assets
and
Other non-interest-bearing liabilities
.
(9)
Interest expense
on
Trading account liabilities
of
ICG
is reported as a reduction of
Interest revenue
.
Interest revenue
and
Interest expense
on cash collateral positions are reported in interest on
Trading account assets
and
Trading account liabilities
, respectively.
(10)
Excludes hybrid financial instruments and beneficial interests in consolidated VIEs that are classified as
Long-term debt
, as these obligations are accounted for in changes in fair value recorded in
Principal transactions
.
(11)
Includes stockholders' equity from discontinued operations.
(12)
Includes allocations for capital and funding costs based on the location of the asset.
68
Analysis of Changes in Interest Revenue
(1)(2)(3)
3rd Qtr. 2018 vs. 2nd Qtr. 2018
3rd Qtr. 2018 vs. 3rd Qtr. 2017
Increase (decrease)
due to change in:
Increase (decrease)
due to change in:
In millions of dollars
Average
volume
Average
rate
Net
change
Average
volume
Average
rate
Net
change
Deposits with banks
(4)
$
32
$
104
$
136
$
29
$
114
$
143
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or
purchased under agreements to resell
In U.S. offices
$
5
$
222
$
227
$
74
$
467
$
541
In offices outside the U.S.
(4)
(15
)
(123
)
(138
)
18
8
26
Total
$
(10
)
$
99
$
89
$
92
$
475
$
567
Trading account assets
(5)
In U.S. offices
$
(7
)
$
204
$
197
$
(65
)
$
195
$
130
In offices outside the U.S.
(4)
(37
)
(271
)
(308
)
38
21
59
Total
$
(44
)
$
(67
)
$
(111
)
$
(27
)
$
216
$
189
Investments
(1)
In U.S. offices
$
7
$
16
$
23
$
(6
)
$
205
$
199
In offices outside the U.S.
(4)
(13
)
3
(10
)
(27
)
95
68
Total
$
(6
)
$
19
$
13
$
(33
)
$
300
$
267
Loans (net of unearned income)
(6)
In U.S. offices
$
48
$
325
$
373
$
248
$
433
$
681
In offices outside the U.S.
(4)
(31
)
106
75
158
44
202
Total
$
17
$
431
$
448
$
406
$
477
$
883
Other interest-earning assets
(7)
$
(34
)
$
74
$
40
$
10
$
132
$
142
Total interest revenue
$
(45
)
$
660
$
615
$
477
$
1,714
$
2,191
(1)
The taxable equivalent adjustment is related to the tax-exempt bond portfolio based on the U.S. federal statutory tax rates of 21% in 2018 and 35% in 2017 and is included in this presentation.
(2)
Rate/volume variance is allocated based on the percentage relationship of changes in volume and changes in rate to the total net change.
(3)
Detailed average volume,
Interest revenue
and
Interest expense
exclude
Discontinued operations
. See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(4)
Changes in average rates reflect changes in prevailing local interest rates, including inflationary effects and monetary corrections in certain countries.
(5)
Interest expense
on
Trading account liabilities
of
ICG
is reported as a reduction of
Interest revenue
.
Interest revenue
and
Interest expense
on cash collateral positions are reported in interest on
Trading account assets
and
Trading account liabilities
, respectively.
(6)
Includes cash-basis loans.
(7)
Includes brokerage receivables.
69
Analysis of Changes in Interest Expense and Net Interest Revenue
(1)(2)(3)
3rd Qtr. 2018 vs. 2nd Qtr. 2018
3rd Qtr. 2018 vs. 3rd Qtr. 2017
Increase (decrease)
due to change in:
Increase (decrease)
due to change in:
In millions of dollars
Average
volume
Average
rate
Net
change
Average
volume
Average
rate
Net
change
Deposits
In U.S. offices
$
29
$
161
$
190
$
53
$
483
$
536
In offices outside the U.S.
(4)
(2
)
148
146
34
235
269
Total
$
27
$
309
$
336
$
87
$
718
$
805
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned
or sold under agreements to repurchase
In U.S. offices
$
21
$
55
$
76
$
61
$
388
$
449
In offices outside the U.S.
(4)
13
(63
)
(50
)
27
62
89
Total
$
34
$
(8
)
$
26
$
88
$
450
$
538
Trading account liabilities
(5)
In U.S. offices
$
9
$
18
$
27
$
21
$
42
$
63
In offices outside the U.S.
(4)
(5
)
15
10
1
40
41
Total
$
4
$
33
$
37
$
22
$
82
$
104
Short-term borrowings
(6)
In U.S. offices
$
7
$
56
$
63
$
28
$
240
$
268
In offices outside the U.S.
(4)
(4
)
(4
)
(8
)
6
(14
)
(8
)
Total
$
3
$
52
$
55
$
34
$
226
$
260
Long-term debt
In U.S. offices
$
16
$
11
$
27
$
10
$
260
$
270
In offices outside the U.S.
(4)
3
(1
)
2
8
4
12
Total
$
19
$
10
$
29
$
18
$
264
$
282
Total interest expense
$
85
$
396
$
483
$
249
$
1,740
$
1,989
Net interest revenue
$
(130
)
$
262
$
132
$
225
$
(23
)
$
202
(1)
The taxable equivalent adjustment is related to the tax-exempt bond portfolio based on the U.S. federal statutory tax rates of 21% in 2018 and 35% in 2017 and is included in this presentation.
(2)
Rate/volume variance is allocated based on the percentage relationship of changes in volume and changes in rate to the total net change.
(3)
Detailed average volume,
Interest revenue
and
Interest expense
exclude
Discontinued operations
. See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(4)
Changes in average rates reflect changes in prevailing local interest rates, including inflationary effects and monetary corrections in certain countries.
(5)
Interest expense
on
Trading account liabilities
of
ICG
is reported as a reduction of
Interest revenue
.
Interest revenue
and
Interest expense
on cash collateral positions are reported in interest on
Trading account assets
and
Trading account liabilities
, respectively.
(6)
Includes brokerage payables.
70
Analysis of Changes in Interest Revenue, Interest Expense and Net Interest Revenue
(1)(2)(3)
Nine Months 2018 vs. Nine Months 2017
Increase (decrease)
due to change in:
In millions of dollars
Average
volume
Average
rate
Net
change
(2)
Deposits with banks
(4)
$
89
$
309
$
398
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell
In U.S. offices
$
76
$
1,176
$
1,252
In offices outside the U.S.
(4)
97
103
200
Total
$
173
$
1,279
$
1,452
Trading account assets
(5)
In U.S. offices
$
(169
)
$
258
$
89
In offices outside the U.S.
(4)
260
164
424
Total
$
91
$
422
$
513
Investments
(1)
In U.S. offices
$
34
$
541
$
575
In offices outside the U.S.
(4)
(58
)
297
239
Total
$
(24
)
$
838
$
814
Loans (net of unearned income)
(6)
In U.S. offices
$
714
$
991
$
1,705
In offices outside the U.S.
(4)
948
(38
)
910
Total
$
1,662
$
953
$
2,615
Other interest-earning assets
$
109
$
237
$
346
Total interest revenue
$
2,100
$
4,038
$
6,138
Deposits
(7)
In U.S. offices
$
132
$
1,242
$
1,374
In offices outside the U.S.
(4)
105
549
654
Total
$
237
$
1,791
$
2,028
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase
In U.S. offices
$
70
$
1,101
$
1,171
In offices outside the U.S.
(4)
124
247
371
Total
$
194
$
1,348
$
1,542
Trading account liabilities
(5)
In U.S. offices
$
27
$
138
$
165
In offices outside the U.S.
(4)
3
94
97
Total
$
30
$
232
$
262
Short-term borrowings
In U.S. offices
$
95
$
813
$
908
In offices outside the U.S.
(4)
8
(63
)
(55
)
Total
$
103
$
750
$
853
Long-term debt
In U.S. offices
$
245
$
511
$
756
In offices outside the U.S.
(4)
5
(14
)
(9
)
Total
$
250
$
497
$
747
Total interest expense
$
814
$
4,618
$
5,432
Net interest revenue
$
1,286
$
(580
)
$
706
(1)
The taxable equivalent adjustment is related to the tax-exempt bond portfolio based on the U.S. federal statutory tax rates of 21% in 2018 and 35% in 2017 and is included in this presentation.
(2)
Rate/volume variance is allocated based on the percentage relationship of changes in volume and changes in rate to the total net change.
(3)
Detailed average volume,
Interest revenue
and
Interest expense
exclude
Discontinued operations
.
71
(4)
Changes in average rates reflect changes in prevailing local interest rates, including inflationary effects and monetary corrections in certain countries.
(5)
Interest expense
on
Trading account liabilities
of
ICG
is reported as a reduction of
Interest revenue
.
Interest revenue
and
Interest expense
on cash collateral positions are reported in
Trading account assets
and
Trading account liabilities
, respectively.
(6)
Includes cash-basis loans.
(7)
The interest expense on deposits includes the FDIC assessment and deposit insurance fees and charges of $1,006 million and $935 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2018
and
2017
, respectively.
72
Market Risk of Trading Portfolios
For additional information on Citi’s market risk of trading portfolios, see “Market Risk—Market Risk of Trading Portfolios” in Citi’s
2017
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Value at Risk
As of
September 30, 2018
, Citi estimates that the conservative features of its VAR calibration contributed an approximate 22% add-on to what would be a VAR estimated under the assumption of stable and perfectly normal distributed markets. As of June 30, 2018, the add-on was 25%.
As set forth in the table below, Citi's average trading VAR as of
September 30, 2018
decreased compared to June 30, 2018. The decrease was mainly due to lower foreign exchange risk in the
Markets
businesses within
ICG
. The decrease of average trading and credit portfolio VAR was in line with the decrease in average trading VAR.
Quarter-end and Average Trading VAR and Trading and Credit Portfolio VAR
Third Quarter
Second Quarter
Third Quarter
In millions of dollars
September 30, 2018
2018 Average
June 30, 2018
2018 Average
September 30, 2017
2017 Average
Interest rate
$
33
$
58
$
60
$
61
$
63
$
63
Credit spread
45
42
46
47
43
44
Covariance adjustment
(1)
(17
)
(24
)
(25
)
(26
)
(28
)
(23
)
Fully diversified interest rate and credit spread
(2)
$
61
$
76
$
81
$
82
$
78
$
84
Foreign exchange
18
21
29
30
26
26
Equity
23
21
23
20
15
13
Commodity
17
21
16
17
20
23
Covariance adjustment
(1)
(58
)
(68
)
(74
)
(69
)
(64
)
(65
)
Total trading VAR—all market risk factors, including general and specific risk (excluding credit portfolios)
(2)
$
61
$
71
$
75
$
80
$
75
$
81
Specific risk-only component
(3)
$
7
$
1
$
2
$
3
$
3
$
2
Total trading VAR—general market risk factors only (excluding credit portfolios)
$
54
$
70
$
73
$
77
$
72
$
79
Incremental impact of the credit portfolio
(4)
$
11
$
11
$
16
$
10
$
8
$
8
Total trading and credit portfolio VAR
$
72
$
82
$
91
$
90
$
83
$
89
(1)
Covariance adjustment (also known as diversification benefit) equals the difference between the total VAR and the sum of the VARs tied to each individual risk type. The benefit reflects the fact that the risks within each and across risk types are not perfectly correlated and, consequently, the total VAR on a given day will be lower than the sum of the VARs relating to each individual risk type. The determination of the primary drivers of changes to the covariance adjustment is made by an examination of the impact of both model parameter and position changes.
(2)
The total trading VAR includes mark-to-market and certain fair value option trading positions in
ICG
,
with the exception of hedges to the loan portfolio, fair value option loans and all CVA exposures. Available-for-sale and accrual exposures are not included.
(3)
The specific risk-only component represents the level of equity and fixed income issuer-specific risk embedded in VAR.
(4)
The credit portfolio is composed of mark-to-market positions associated with non-trading business units including Citi Treasury, the CVA relating to derivative counterparties and all associated CVA hedges. FVA and DVA are not included. The credit portfolio also includes hedges to the loan portfolio, fair value option loans and hedges to the leveraged finance pipeline within capital markets origination in
ICG
.
73
The table below provides the range of market factor VARs associated with Citi’s total trading VAR, inclusive of specific risk:
Third Quarter
Second Quarter
Third Quarter
2018
2018
2017
In millions of dollars
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Interest rate
$
33
$
80
$
38
$
91
$
33
$
97
Credit spread
38
47
43
52
38
52
Fully diversified interest rate and credit spread
$
61
$
95
$
59
$
118
$
59
$
108
Foreign exchange
13
27
20
44
19
38
Equity
16
28
15
26
8
18
Commodity
16
27
13
22
14
31
Total trading
$
56
$
91
$
57
$
120
$
58
$
106
Total trading and credit portfolio
66
101
69
123
67
112
Note: No covariance adjustment can be inferred from the above table as the high and low for each market factor will be from different close-of-business dates.
The following table provides the VAR for
ICG
, excluding the CVA relating to derivative counterparties, hedges of CVA, fair value option loans and hedges to the loan portfolio:
In millions of dollars
Sept. 30, 2018
Total—all market risk factors, including
general and specific risk
Average—during quarter
$
71
High—during quarter
91
Low—during quarter
56
Regulatory VAR Back-testing
In accordance with Basel III, Citi is required to perform back-testing to evaluate the effectiveness of its Regulatory VAR model. Regulatory VAR back-testing is the process in which the daily one-day VAR, at a 99% confidence interval, is compared to the buy-and-hold profit and loss (i.e., the profit and loss impact if the portfolio is held constant at the end of the day and re-priced the following day). Buy-and-hold profit and loss represents the daily mark-to-market profit and loss attributable to price movements in covered positions from the close of the previous business day. Buy-and-hold profit and loss excludes realized trading revenue, net interest, fees and commissions, intra-day trading profit and loss and changes in reserves.
Based on a 99% confidence level, Citi would expect two to three days in any one year where buy-and-hold losses exceeded the Regulatory VAR. Given the conservative calibration of Citi’s VAR model (as a result of taking the greater of short- and long-term volatilities and fat-tail scaling of volatilities), Citi would expect fewer exceptions under normal and stable market conditions. Periods of unstable market conditions could increase the number of back-testing exceptions.
As of
September 30, 2018
, there was one back-testing exception observed for Citi’s Regulatory VAR for the prior 12 months, due to market moves triggered by political events in Italy.
74
Country Risk
For additional information on country risk at Citi, see “Country Risk” in Citi’s
2017
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Top 25 Country Exposures
The following table presents Citi’s top 25 exposures by
country (excluding the U.S.) as of September 30, 2018. The total exposure as of September 30, 2018 to the top 25 countries disclosed below in combination with the U.S., would represent approximately 95% of Citi’s exposure to all countries. For purposes of the table, loan amounts are reflected in the country where the loan is booked, which is generally based on the domicile of the borrower. For example, a loan to a Chinese subsidiary of a Switzerland-based corporation will generally be categorized as a loan in China. In addition, Citi has developed regional booking centers in certain countries, most significantly in the United Kingdom (U.K.) and Ireland,
in order to more efficiently serve its corporate customers. As an example, with respect to the U.K., only 28% of corporate
loans presented in the table below are to U.K. domiciled
entities (29% for unfunded commitments), with the balance of
the loans predominately to European domiciled counterparties.
Approximately 83% of the total U.K. funded loans and 91% of
the total U.K. unfunded commitments were investment grade
as of September 30, 2018. Trading account assets and investment securities are generally categorized based on the domicile of the issuer of the security of the underlying reference entity. For additional information on the assets included in the table, see the footnotes to the table below.
For a discussion of uncertainties arising as a result of the U.K.’s potential exit from the EU, see “Risk Factors—Strategic Risks” in Citigroup’s
2017
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
In billions of dollars
ICG
loans
(1)
GCB loans
Other funded
(2)
Unfunded
(3)
Net MTM on derivatives/repos
(4)
Total hedges (on loans and CVA)
Investment securities
(5)
Trading account assets
(6)
Total
as of
3Q18
Total
as of
2Q18
Total
as of
3Q17
Total as a % of Citi as of 3Q18
United Kingdom
$
40.3
$
—
$
8.3
$
62.1
$
11.6
$
(3.4
)
$
5.6
$
(0.8
)
$
123.7
$
125.8
$
110.2
7.7
%
Mexico
9.9
26.8
0.3
7.9
0.9
(0.7
)
12.4
4.4
61.9
60.2
62.8
3.9
Hong Kong
16.8
12.3
0.8
6.9
1.6
(0.2
)
6.6
1.1
45.9
45.1
40.8
2.9
Singapore
13.3
12.3
0.4
5.1
1.6
(0.2
)
7.9
0.6
41.0
41.2
43.8
2.6
Korea
2.1
19.0
0.2
2.8
1.2
(1.1
)
8.8
0.7
33.7
35.0
34.2
2.1
Ireland
12.2
—
0.8
16.7
0.5
—
—
0.9
31.1
31.3
28.8
1.9
India
4.1
6.7
0.8
5.1
2.6
(0.8
)
7.8
0.9
27.2
27.6
28.7
1.7
Brazil
12.8
—
—
3.0
4.5
(1.0
)
3.2
3.4
25.9
24.4
28.0
1.6
Australia
5.1
10.0
—
6.2
1.0
(0.4
)
1.8
0.4
24.1
23.2
27.0
1.5
Germany
0.1
—
0.1
4.1
3.7
(3.4
)
9.3
5.8
19.7
16.8
18.6
1.2
China
7.4
4.7
0.4
1.9
1.5
(0.5
)
2.8
0.6
18.8
19.5
20.8
1.2
Japan
2.9
0.1
0.1
2.5
4.4
(1.4
)
4.7
5.1
18.4
15.9
18.8
1.1
Taiwan
5.1
8.9
0.1
1.1
0.4
—
1.1
1.1
17.8
19.0
18.5
1.1
Canada
2.3
0.7
0.5
7.4
2.3
(0.3
)
3.1
0.4
16.4
15.8
16.0
1.0
Poland
3.7
2.0
0.1
3.8
0.1
(0.1
)
4.0
0.8
14.4
13.0
13.6
0.9
Jersey
6.6
—
0.3
3.4
—
—
—
—
10.3
10.0
4.5
0.6
United Arab Emirates
5.6
1.6
0.1
2.5
0.1
(0.1
)
—
—
9.8
10.2
6.7
0.6
Malaysia
1.8
4.7
0.3
1.1
0.2
(0.1
)
1.3
0.3
9.6
9.7
9.1
0.6
Thailand
1.2
2.4
—
1.5
—
—
1.4
0.7
7.2
6.9
7.0
0.4
Indonesia
2.2
1.0
0.1
1.3
0.1
(0.1
)
1.1
0.1
5.8
6.2
6.2
0.4
Luxembourg
—
—
—
—
0.5
(0.3
)
4.1
0.8
5.1
4.9
6.1
0.3
South Africa
1.8
—
—
1.4
0.5
(0.1
)
1.5
(0.1
)
5.0
5.3
4.3
0.3
Philippines
0.8
1.2
—
0.4
1.1
(0.1
)
1.4
0.1
4.9
5.2
3.6
0.3
Russia
1.8
0.9
—
0.8
0.1
(0.1
)
0.7
(0.1
)
4.1
4.6
5.0
0.3
Italy
0.2
—
—
2.3
5.0
(4.3
)
—
0.5
3.7
3.2
3.1
0.2
Total
36.4
%
(1)
ICG
loans reflect funded corporate loans and private bank loans, net of unearned income. As of
September 30, 2018
, private bank loans in the table above totaled $24.5 billion, concentrated in Hong Kong ($7.0 billion), Singapore ($6.8 billion) and the U.K. ($6.1 billion).
75
(2)
Other funded includes other direct exposure such as accounts receivable, loans HFS, other loans in
Corporate/Other
and investments accounted for under the equity method.
(3)
Unfunded exposure includes unfunded corporate lending commitments, letters of credit and other contingencies.
(4)
Net mark-to-market counterparty risk on OTC derivatives and securities lending/borrowing transactions (repos). Exposures are shown net of collateral and inclusive of CVA. Includes margin loans.
(5)
Investment securities include securities available-for-sale, recorded at fair market value, and securities held-to-maturity, recorded at historical cost.
(6)
Trading account assets are shown on a net basis and include issuer risk on cash products and derivative exposure where the underlying reference entity/issuer is located in that country.
INCOME TAXES
Deferred Tax Assets
For additional information on Citi’s deferred tax assets (DTAs), see “Risk Factors—Strategic Risks,” “Significant Accounting Policies and Significant Estimates—Income Taxes” and Notes 1 and 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Citi’s
2017
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
At
September 30, 2018
, Citigroup had recorded net DTAs of approximately $23.0 billion, an increase of $0.1 billion from June 30, 2018 and an increase of $0.5 billion from December 31, 2017. The increase for the quarter was primarily driven by losses in
Other comprehensive income
, partially offset by earnings. The increase for the nine months was primarily driven by losses in
Other comprehensive income
and adoption of ASU 2016-16 (see Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements), partially offset by earnings.
The table below summarizes Citi’s net DTAs balance. Of Citi’s net DTAs as of September 30, 2018, those arising from net operating losses, foreign tax credit and general business credit carry-forwards are 100% deducted in calculating Citi’s regulatory capital, while DTAs arising from temporary differences are deducted from regulatory capital if in excess of the 10%/15% limitations.
Despite the $0.5 billion increase in net DTAs from December 31, 2017, Citi was able to reduce the amount of DTAs arising from net operating losses, foreign tax credits and general business credit carry-forwards by $0.7 billion, thereby reducing the amount of DTAs that was excluded from Common Equity Tier 1 Capital from $12.3 billion to $11.6 billion as of September 30, 2018. There were no DTAs in excess of the 10%/15% limitations as of September 30, 2018, (see “Capital Resources” above). Thus, approximately $11.4 billion of net DTAs was not deducted in calculating regulatory capital pursuant to Basel III standards as of September 30, 2018, and was appropriately risk weighted as per those rules.
Jurisdiction/Component
DTAs balance
In billions of dollars
September 30,
2018
December 31, 2017
Total U.S.
$
20.4
$
19.9
Total foreign
2.6
2.6
Total
$
23.0
$
22.5
Effective Tax Rate
Citi’s effective tax rate for the third quarter of 2018 was 24.1%, as compared with 31.1% in the third quarter of 2017. The decrease in the effective tax rate was primarily due to the lower U.S. federal statutory tax rate pursuant to Tax Reform.
SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin 118
Citi’s third quarter of 2018 tax provision did not include any changes to Citi’s provisional income tax estimates recorded in the fourth quarter of 2017. The U.S. Treasury issued certain U.S. tax reform guidance through September 30, 2018 and it is anticipated that additional guidance will be issued by the end of 2018. Citi expects to complete its analysis within the one-year measurement period and record final adjustments to the provisional income tax estimates during the fourth quarter of 2018.
76
FUTURE APPLICATION OF ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
Accounting for Financial Instruments—Credit Losses
In June 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued ASU No. 2016-13,
Financial Instruments—Credit Losses
(Topic 326).
The ASU introduces a new credit loss methodology, the Current Expected Credit Losses (CECL) methodology, which requires earlier recognition of credit losses, while also providing additional transparency about credit risk.
The CECL methodology utilizes a lifetime “expected credit loss” measurement objective for the recognition of credit losses for loans, held-to-maturity debt securities and other receivables at the time the financial asset is originated or acquired. The expected credit losses (ECL) are adjusted each period for changes in expected lifetime credit losses. This methodology replaces the multiple existing impairment methods in current GAAP, which generally require that a loss be incurred before it is recognized. For available-for-sale debt securities where fair value is less than cost, credit-related impairment, if any, will be recognized through an allowance for credit losses and adjusted each period for changes in credit risk.
The CECL methodology represents a significant change from existing GAAP and may result in material changes to the Company’s accounting for financial instruments. The Company is evaluating the effect that ASU 2016-13 will have on its Consolidated Financial Statements and related disclosures. The impact of the ASU will depend upon the state of the economy and the nature of Citi’s portfolios at the date of adoption. Based on a preliminary analysis performed in 2018 and the environment and portfolios at that time, the overall impact is estimated to be an approximate 10% to 20% increase in credit loss reserves. However, there are still some implementation questions to be resolved by the FASB that could affect the estimated impact, including (i) the amounts and types of recoveries that can be included in expected credit loss estimates and (ii) whether recovery inputs can be discounted under a non-discounted cash flow approach to estimating expected credit losses.
The ASU will be effective for Citi as of January 1, 2020. For additional information, see “Capital Resources—Regulatory Capital Treatment—Implementation and Transition of the Current Expected Credit Losses (CECL) Methodology” in the First Quarter of 2018 Form 10-Q.
Lease Accounting
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02,
Leases (Topic 842)
, which is intended to increase transparency and comparability of accounting for lease transactions. The ASU will require lessees to recognize leases on the balance sheet as lease assets and lease liabilities and will require both quantitative and qualitative disclosures regarding key information about leasing arrangements. Lessor accounting is largely unchanged. The guidance is effective beginning January 1, 2019 and will be adopted prospectively with a cumulative adjustment to
Retained earnings
. The Company estimates that upon adoption, its Consolidated Balance Sheet
will have an approximate $5 billion increase in assets and liabilities. Additionally, the Company estimates an approximate $140 million increase in retained earnings due to the cumulative effect of recognizing previously deferred gains on sale/leaseback transactions.
Subsequent Measurement of Goodwill
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04,
Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment.
The ASU simplifies the subsequent measurement of goodwill impairment by eliminating the requirement to calculate the implied fair value of goodwill (i.e., the current Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test) to measure a goodwill impairment charge.
Under
the ASU, the impairment test is the comparison of the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount (the current Step 1), with the impairment charge being the deficit in fair value but not exceeding the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. The simplified one-step impairment test applies to all reporting units (including those with zero or negative carrying amounts).
The ASU will be effective for Citi as of January 1, 2020. The impact of the ASU will depend upon the performance of Citi’s reporting units and the market conditions impacting the fair value of each reporting unit going forward.
Fair Value Measurement
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-13,
Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework—Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement.
The amendments modify certain disclosure requirements for fair value measurements and are effective January 1, 2020, with early adoption permitted. Adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on the Company.
See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of “Accounting Changes.”
77
DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Citi’s disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, including without limitation that information required to be disclosed by Citi in its SEC filings is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Citi’s Disclosure Committee assists the CEO and CFO in their responsibilities to design, establish, maintain and evaluate the effectiveness of Citi’s disclosure controls and procedures. The Disclosure Committee is responsible for, among other things, the oversight, maintenance and implementation of the disclosure controls and procedures, subject to the supervision and oversight of the CEO and CFO.
Citi’s management, with the participation of its CEO and CFO, has evaluated the effectiveness of Citigroup’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of
September 30, 2018
and, based on that evaluation, the CEO and CFO have concluded that at that date, Citigroup’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO SECTION 219 OF THE IRAN THREAT REDUCTION AND SYRIA HUMAN RIGHTS ACT
Pursuant to Section 219 of the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012, which added Section 13(r) to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, Citi is required to disclose in its annual or quarterly reports, as applicable, whether it or any of its affiliates knowingly engaged in certain activities, transactions or dealings relating to Iran or with individuals or entities that are subject to sanctions under U.S. law. Disclosure is generally required even where the activities, transactions or dealings were conducted in compliance with applicable law. Citi disclosed reportable activities pursuant to Section 219 in the second quarter of 2018 in the Second Quarter of 2018 Form 10-Q.
During the third quarter of 2018, Bank Handlowy w Warszawie S.A., a Citibank subsidiary located in Poland, processed a funds transfer involving the Iranian Embassy in Poland. The value of the funds transfer was EUR 100.00 (approximately USD 116.54). In addition, Citibank N.A., India Branch, processed a payment involving the Consulate General of Iran in India. The value of the payment was INR 8,200.00 (approximately USD 111.62). These payments were for visa- and passport-related fees respectively, which are permissible under the travel exemption in the Iranian Transactions and Sanctions Regulations. Citibank realized nominal fees for the processing of these payments.
78
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain statements in this Form 10-Q, including but not limited to statements included within the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the rules and regulations of the SEC. In addition, Citigroup also may make forward-looking statements in its other documents filed or furnished with the SEC, and its management may make forward-looking statements orally to analysts, investors, representatives of the media and others.
Generally, forward-looking statements are not based on historical facts but instead represent Citigroup’s and its management’s beliefs regarding future events. Such statements may be identified by words such as believe, expect, anticipate, intend, estimate, may increase, may fluctuate, target, illustrative, and similar expressions or future or conditional verbs such as will, should, would and could.
Such statements are based on management’s current expectations and are subject to risks, uncertainties and changes in circumstances. Actual results and capital and other financial conditions may differ materially from those included in these statements due to a variety of factors, including without limitation (i) the precautionary statements included within each individual business’s discussion and analysis of its results of operations above and in Citi’s 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K, First Quarter of 2018 Form 10-Q and Second Quarter of 2018 Form 10-Q; (ii) the factors listed and described under “Risk Factors” in Citi’s 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K; and (iii) the risks and uncertainties summarized below:
•
the potential impact on Citi’s ability to return capital to common shareholders, consistent with its capital optimization efforts and targets, due to, among other things, Citi’s results of operations, Citi’s ability to effectively manage its level of risk weighted assets and GSIB surcharge, potential changes to the regulatory capital framework, the CCAR process and the results of regulatory stress tests or any changes to the stress testing and CCAR requirements or process, such as the proposed introduction of a firm-specific “stress capital buffer” (SCB), including as a result of any year-to-year variability resulting from the SCB and the impact on Citi’s estimated management buffer;
•
the ongoing regulatory and other uncertainties and changes faced by financial institutions, including Citi, in the U.S. and globally, including, uncertainties and potential changes to various aspects of the regulatory capital framework, and the potential impact these uncertainties and changes could have on Citi’s businesses, results of operations, financial condition, strategy or organizational structure and compliance risks and costs;
•
Citi’s ability to utilize its remaining DTAs (including the foreign tax credit component of its DTAs) and thus reduce the negative impact of the DTAs on Citi’s regulatory capital, including as a result of its ability to generate U.S. taxable income and by the provisions of and guidance issued in connection with Tax Reform;
•
the potential impact to Citi if its interpretation or application of the complex tax laws to which it is subject, such as withholding tax obligations and stamp and other transactional taxes, differs from those of the relevant governmental authorities;
•
Citi’s ability to achieve its expected results from ongoing investments in its businesses and efficiency initiatives, including revenue growth, as part of Citi’s operational and financial objectives and targets, including as a result of factors that Citi cannot control;
•
the potential impact from declining sales and revenues or other difficulties of any retailer or merchant with whom Citi has a co-branding or private label credit card relationship, such as Sears, including as a result of accelerated store closures, termination of a particular relationship, external factors outside the control of either party to the relationship, such as the general economic environment, or other factors, including bankruptcies, liquidations, consolidations and other similar events, and the potential negative impact any such event could have on Citi retail services, including as a result of loss of revenues, higher cost of credit, impairment of purchased credit card relationships and contract-related intangibles or other losses;
•
the potential impact to Citi’s businesses, including funding costs, level and mix of deposits and other products and net interest revenues, from ongoing increases in interest rates;
•
the potential impact to Citi’s businesses, credit costs, revenues or other results of operations and financial condition as a result of macroeconomic and geopolitical challenges and uncertainties and volatility, including, among others, potential policy and/or regulatory changes arising from a new administration in Mexico, the implementation of protectionist trade or other related policies by the U.S. and/or other countries, governmental fiscal and monetary actions, or expected actions, such as any balance sheet normalization program implemented by the Federal Reserve Board or other central banks, any agreement, or lack thereof, for the U.K. to withdraw from the European Union, or geopolitical disputes;
•
the various risks faced by Citi as a result of its presence in the emerging markets, including, among others, sovereign volatility, political events, foreign exchange controls, limitations on foreign investment, sociopolitical instability (including from hyper-inflation), fraud, nationalization or loss of licenses, business restrictions, sanctions or asset freezes, potential criminal charges, closure of branches or subsidiaries and confiscation of assets as well as the increased compliance, regulatory and legal risks and costs;
•
Citi’s ability in its resolution plan submissions to address any deficiencies identified or future guidance, including any final 2019 resolution plan guidance, provided by the Federal Reserve Board and FDIC;
•
the potential impact on Citi’s performance, including its competitive position and ability to effectively manage its businesses and continue to execute its strategies, if Citi is
79
unable to hire and retain highly qualified employees for any reason;
•
Citi’s ability to effectively compete with U.S. and non-U.S. financial services companies and others;
•
the potential impact of concentrations of risk, such as credit and market risk arising from the size and volume of Citi’s transactions with counterparties in the public sector, including the U.S. government and its agencies, or in the financial services industry, on Citi’s results of operations;
•
the potential impacts on Citi’s liquidity and/or costs of funding as a result of external factors, including, among others, market disruptions and governmental fiscal and monetary policies as well as regulatory changes or negative investor perceptions of Citi’s creditworthiness;
•
the impact of ratings downgrades of Citi or one or more of its more significant subsidiaries or issuing entities on Citi’s funding and liquidity as well as the results of operations of certain of its businesses;
•
the potential impact to Citi from a disruption of its operational systems, including as a result of, among other things, human error, fraud or malice, accidental technological failure, electrical or telecommunication outages or failure of computer servers, or other similar damage to Citi’s property or assets, or failures by third parties with whom Citi does business, as well as disruptions in the operations of Citi’s clients, customers or other third parties;
•
the increasing risk of continually evolving, sophisticated cybersecurity risks faced by financial institutions, including Citi and third parties with whom it does business, and others (such as theft of funds or theft, loss, misuse or disclosure of confidential client, customer, corporate or network information or assets and other attempts by unauthorized parties to disrupt computer and network systems), and the potential impact from such risks, including, among others, reputational damage with clients, customers and others, lost revenues, additional costs (including credit, remediation and other costs), regulatory penalties and inquiries, legal exposure and other financial losses;
•
the potential impact of incorrect assumptions or estimates in Citi’s financial statements or the impact of ongoing changes to financial accounting and reporting standards or interpretations, on how Citi records and reports its financial condition and results of operations;
•
the potential impact to Citi’s results of operations and/or regulatory capital and capital ratios if Citi’s risk management process, strategies or models, including those related to its ability to manage and aggregate data, are deficient or ineffective, require refinement, modification or enhancement or any approval is withdrawn by Citi’s U.S. banking regulators;
•
the potential impact to Citi of ongoing implementation and interpretation of regulatory changes and requirements in the U.S. and globally, such as on Citi’s compliance risks and costs, including reputational and legal risks as
well as remediation and other financial costs, such as penalties and fines; and
•
the potential outcomes of the extensive legal and regulatory proceedings, investigations and other inquiries to which Citi is or may be subject at any given time, particularly given the increased focus on conduct risk and the severity of the remedies sought and potential collateral consequences to Citi arising from such outcomes.
Any forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of Citigroup speak only as to the date they are made, and Citi does not undertake to update forward-looking statements to reflect the impact of circumstances or events that arise after the date the forward-looking statements were made.
80
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES TABLE OF CONTENTS
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Consolidated Statement of Income (Unaudited)—
For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018 and 2017
82
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income (Unaudited)—For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018 and 2017
83
Consolidated Balance Sheet—September 30, 2018 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2017
84
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (Unaudited)—For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018 and 2017
86
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows (Unaudited)—
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018 and 2017
88
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
Note 1—Basis of Presentation and Accounting Changes
90
Note 2—Discontinued Operations and Significant Disposals
93
Note 3—Business Segments
94
Note 4—Interest Revenue and Expense
95
Note 5—Commissions and Fees; Administration and Other
Fiduciary Fees
96
Note 6—Principal Transactions
99
Note 7—Incentive Plans
100
Note 8—Retirement Benefits
100
Note 9—Earnings per Share
105
Note 10—Federal Funds, Securities Borrowed, Loaned and
Subject to Repurchase Agreements
106
Note 11—Brokerage Receivables and Brokerage Payables
109
Note 12—Investments
110
Note 13—Loans
123
Note 14—Allowance for Credit Losses
136
Note 15—Goodwill and Intangible Assets
138
Note 16—Debt
140
Note 17—Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive
Income (Loss) (AOCI)
141
Note 18—Securitizations and Variable Interest Entities
147
Note 19—Derivatives Activities
156
Note 20—Fair Value Measurement
167
Note 21—Fair Value Elections
186
Note 22—Guarantees and Commitments
190
Note 23—Contingencies
195
Note 24—Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements
197
81
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME (UNAUDITED)
Citigroup Inc. and Subsidiaries
Three Months Ended September 30,
Nine Months Ended September 30,
In millions of dollars, except per share amounts
2018
2017
2018
2017
Revenues
Interest revenue
$
18,170
$
15,914
$
52,052
$
45,729
Interest expense
6,368
4,379
17,413
11,981
Net interest revenue
$
11,802
$
11,535
$
34,639
$
33,748
Commissions and fees
$
2,803
$
3,241
$
8,944
$
9,552
Principal transactions
2,566
2,248
8,006
7,985
Administration and other fiduciary fees
911
929
2,750
2,672
Realized gains on sales of investments, net
69
213
341
626
Impairment losses on investments
Gross impairment losses
(70
)
(15
)
(113
)
(47
)
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings
$
(70
)
$
(15
)
$
(113
)
$
(47
)
Other revenue
$
308
$
268
$
1,163
$
404
Total non-interest revenues
$
6,587
$
6,884
$
21,091
$
21,192
Total revenues, net of interest expense
$
18,389
$
18,419
$
55,730
$
54,940
Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims
Provision for loan losses
$
1,906
$
2,146
$
5,504
$
5,487
Policyholder benefits and claims
26
28
73
81
Provision (release) for unfunded lending commitments
42
(175
)
66
(190
)
Total provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims
$
1,974
$
1,999
$
5,643
$
5,378
Operating expenses
Compensation and benefits
$
5,319
$
5,304
$
16,578
$
16,301
Premises and equipment
565
608
1,728
1,832
Technology/communication
1,806
1,764
5,361
5,122
Advertising and marketing
378
417
1,170
1,222
Other operating
2,243
2,324
7,111
7,423
Total operating expenses
$
10,311
$
10,417
$
31,948
$
31,900
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
$
6,104
$
6,003
$
18,139
$
17,662
Provision for income taxes
1,471
1,866
4,356
5,524
Income from continuing operations
$
4,633
$
4,137
$
13,783
$
12,138
Discontinued operations
Loss from discontinued operations
$
(8
)
$
(9
)
$
(17
)
$
(4
)
Benefit for income taxes
—
(4
)
(17
)
(2
)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes
$
(8
)
$
(5
)
$
—
$
(2
)
Net income before attribution of noncontrolling interests
$
4,625
$
4,132
$
13,783
$
12,136
Noncontrolling interests
3
(1
)
51
41
Citigroup’s net income
$
4,622
$
4,133
$
13,732
$
12,095
Basic earnings per share
(1)
Income from continuing operations
$
1.74
$
1.42
$
5.04
$
4.05
Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes
—
—
—
—
Net income
$
1.73
$
1.42
$
5.04
$
4.05
Weighted average common shares outstanding
(in millions)
2,479.8
2,683.6
2,524.1
2,729.3
Diluted earnings per share
(1)
Income from continuing operations
$
1.74
$
1.42
$
5.04
$
4.05
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes
—
—
—
—
Net income
$
1.73
$
1.42
$
5.04
$
4.05
Adjusted weighted average common shares outstanding
(in millions)
2,481.4
2,683.7
2,525.5
2,729.5
(1)
Due to rounding, earnings per share on continuing operations and discontinued operations may not sum to earnings per share on net income.
The Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
82
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Citigroup Inc. and Subsidiaries
(UNAUDITED)
Three Months Ended September 30,
Nine Months Ended September 30,
In millions of dollars
2018
2017
2018
2017
Citigroup’s net income
$
4,622
$
4,133
$
13,732
$
12,095
Add: Citigroup's other comprehensive income
Net change in unrealized gains and losses on investment
securities, net of taxes
(1)(2)
$
(605
)
$
(66
)
$
(2,161
)
$
127
Net change in debt valuation adjustment (DVA), net of taxes
(1)
(287
)
(123
)
159
(267
)
Net change in cash flow hedges, net of taxes
(74
)
8
(397
)
123
Benefit plans liability adjustment, net of taxes
26
(29
)
415
(176
)
Net change in foreign currency translation adjustment, net of taxes
and hedges
(221
)
218
(1,968
)
2,179
Net change in excluded component of fair value hedges, net of
taxes
10
—
(22
)
—
Citigroup’s total other comprehensive income (loss)
$
(1,151
)
$
8
$
(3,974
)
$
1,986
Citigroup’s total comprehensive income
$
3,471
$
4,141
$
9,758
$
14,081
Add: Other comprehensive income attributable to
noncontrolling interests
$
8
$
12
$
(35
)
$
82
Add: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
3
(1
)
51
41
Total comprehensive income
$
3,482
$
4,152
$
9,774
$
14,204
(1)
See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(2)
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018, respectively, amount represents the net change in unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale (AFS) debt securities. Effective January 1, 2018, the AFS category is eliminated for equity securities under ASU 2016-01.
The Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
83
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
Citigroup Inc. and Subsidiaries
September 30,
2018
December 31,
In millions of dollars
(Unaudited)
2017
Assets
Cash and due from banks (including segregated cash and other deposits)
$
25,727
$
23,775
Deposits with banks
173,559
156,741
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed and purchased under agreements to resell (including $178,442 and $132,949 as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively, at fair value)
280,941
232,478
Brokerage receivables
40,679
38,384
Trading account assets (including $107,753 and $99,460 pledged to creditors at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively)
257,502
252,790
Investments:
Available-for-sale debt securities (including $7,854 and $9,493 pledged to creditors as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively)
284,782
290,725
Held-to-maturity debt securities (including $1,073 and $435 pledged to creditors as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively)
53,249
53,320
Equity securities (including $1,388 and $1,395 at fair value as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively, of which $189 was available for sale as of December 31, 2017)
7,482
8,245
Total investments
$
345,513
$
352,290
Loans:
Consumer (including $21 and $25 as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively, at fair value)
325,469
333,656
Corporate (including $4,218 and $4,349 as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively, at fair value)
349,440
333,378
Loans, net of unearned income
$
674,909
$
667,034
Allowance for loan losses
(12,336
)
(12,355
)
Total loans, net
$
662,573
$
654,679
Goodwill
22,187
22,256
Intangible assets (other than MSRs)
4,598
4,588
Mortgage servicing rights (MSRs)
618
558
Other assets (including $25,151 and $18,559 as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively, at fair value)
111,268
103,926
Total assets
$
1,925,165
$
1,842,465
The following table presents certain assets of consolidated variable interest entities (VIEs), which are included in the Consolidated Balance Sheet above. The assets in the table below include those assets that can only be used to settle obligations of consolidated VIEs, presented on the following page, and are in excess of those obligations. Additionally, the assets in the table below include third-party assets of consolidated VIEs only and exclude intercompany balances that eliminate in consolidation.
September 30,
2018
December 31,
In millions of dollars
(Unaudited)
2017
Assets of consolidated VIEs to be used to settle obligations of consolidated VIEs
Cash and due from banks
$
40
$
52
Trading account assets
722
1,129
Investments
2,276
2,498
Loans, net of unearned income
Consumer
48,678
54,656
Corporate
17,971
19,835
Loans, net of unearned income
$
66,649
$
74,491
Allowance for loan losses
(1,876
)
(1,930
)
Total loans, net
$
64,773
$
72,561
Other assets
167
154
Total assets of consolidated VIEs to be used to settle obligations of consolidated VIEs
$
67,978
$
76,394
Statement continues on the next page.
84
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
Citigroup Inc. and Subsidiaries
(Continued)
September 30,
2018
December 31,
In millions of dollars, except shares and per share amounts
(Unaudited)
2017
Liabilities
Non-interest-bearing deposits in U.S. offices
$
111,446
$
126,880
Interest-bearing deposits in U.S. offices (including $354 and $303 as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively, at fair value)
351,291
318,613
Non-interest-bearing deposits in offices outside the U.S.
83,200
87,440
Interest-bearing deposits in offices outside the U.S. (including $1,086 and $1,162 as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively, at fair value)
459,239
426,889
Total deposits
$
1,005,176
$
959,822
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned and sold under agreements to repurchase (including $48,148 and $40,638 as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively, at fair value)
175,915
156,277
Brokerage payables
73,346
61,342
Trading account liabilities
147,652
125,170
Short-term borrowings (including $5,041 and $4,627 as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively, at fair value)
33,770
44,452
Long-term debt (including $36,771 and $31,392 as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively, at fair value)
235,270
236,709
Other liabilities (including $19,947 and $13,961 as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively, at fair value)
56,173
57,021
Total liabilities
$
1,727,302
$
1,640,793
Stockholders’ equity
Preferred stock ($1.00 par value; authorized shares: 30 million), issued shares:
as of September 30, 2018—761,400
and as of December 31, 2017—770,120, at aggregate liquidation value
$
19,035
$
19,253
Common stock ($0.01 par value; authorized shares: 6 billion), issued shares:
as of September 30, 2018—3,099,567,177
and as of December 31, 2017—3,099,523,273
31
31
Additional paid-in capital
107,825
108,008
Retained earnings
148,436
138,425
Treasury stock, at cost:
September 30, 2018—657,430,364 shares
and
December 31, 2017—529,614,728 shares
(39,678
)
(30,309
)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (AOCI)
(38,645
)
(34,668
)
Total Citigroup stockholders’ equity
$
197,004
$
200,740
Noncontrolling interest
859
932
Total equity
$
197,863
$
201,672
Total liabilities and equity
$
1,925,165
$
1,842,465
The following table presents certain liabilities of consolidated VIEs, which are included in the Consolidated Balance Sheet above. The liabilities in the table below include third-party liabilities of consolidated VIEs only and exclude intercompany balances that eliminate in consolidation. The liabilities also exclude amounts where creditors or beneficial interest holders have recourse to the general credit of Citigroup.
September 30,
2018
December 31,
In millions of dollars
(Unaudited)
2017
Liabilities of consolidated VIEs for which creditors or beneficial interest holders
do not have recourse to the general credit of Citigroup
Short-term borrowings
$
12,307
$
10,142
Long-term debt
27,625
30,492
Other liabilities
748
611
Total liabilities of consolidated VIEs for which creditors or beneficial interest
holders do not have recourse to the general credit of Citigroup
$
40,680
$
41,245
The Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
85
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Citigroup Inc. and Subsidiaries
(UNAUDITED)
Three Months Ended September 30,
Nine Months Ended September 30,
In millions of dollars
2018
2017
2018
2017
Preferred stock at aggregate liquidation value
Balance, beginning of period
$
19,035
$
19,253
$
19,253
$
19,253
Redemption of preferred stock
—
—
(218
)
—
Balance, end of period
$
19,035
$
19,253
$
19,035
$
19,253
Common stock and additional paid-in capital
Balance, beginning of period
$
107,755
$
107,829
$
108,039
$
108,073
Employee benefit plans
98
102
(187
)
(137
)
Other
3
(4
)
4
(9
)
Balance, end of period
$
107,856
$
107,927
$
107,856
$
107,927
Retained earnings
Balance, beginning of period
$
145,211
$
152,178
$
138,425
$
146,477
Adjustment to opening balance, net of taxes
(1)
—
—
(84
)
(660
)
Adjusted balance, beginning of period
$
145,211
$
152,178
$
138,341
$
145,817
Citigroup’s net income
4,622
4,133
13,732
12,095
Common dividends
(2)
(1,127
)
(865
)
(2,777
)
(1,755
)
Preferred dividends
(270
)
(272
)
(860
)
(893
)
Other
(3)
—
—
—
(90
)
Balance, end of period
$
148,436
$
155,174
$
148,436
$
155,174
Treasury stock, at cost
Balance, beginning of period
$
(34,413
)
$
(19,342
)
$
(30,309
)
$
(16,302
)
Employee benefit plans
(4)
6
3
477
526
Treasury stock acquired
(5)
(5,271
)
(5,490
)
(9,846
)
(9,053
)
Balance, end of period
$
(39,678
)
$
(24,829
)
$
(39,678
)
$
(24,829
)
Citigroup’s accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
Balance, beginning of period
$
(37,494
)
$
(29,899
)
$
(34,668
)
$
(32,381
)
Adjustment to opening balance, net of taxes
(1)
—
—
(3
)
504
Adjusted balance, beginning of period
$
(37,494
)
$
(29,899
)
$
(34,671
)
$
(31,877
)
Citigroup’s total other comprehensive income (loss)
(1,151
)
8
(3,974
)
1,986
Balance, end of period
$
(38,645
)
$
(29,891
)
$
(38,645
)
$
(29,891
)
Total Citigroup common stockholders’ equity
$
177,969
$
208,381
$
177,969
$
208,381
Total Citigroup stockholders’ equity
$
197,004
$
227,634
$
197,004
$
227,634
Noncontrolling interests
Balance, beginning of period
$
874
$
1,088
$
932
$
1,023
Transactions between noncontrolling-interest shareholders and the related consolidated subsidiary
—
(3
)
—
(3
)
Transactions between Citigroup and the noncontrolling-interest shareholders
(23
)
(56
)
(39
)
(50
)
Net income attributable to noncontrolling-interest shareholders
3
—
51
41
Distributions paid to noncontrolling-interest shareholders
(2
)
(44
)
(38
)
(44
)
Other comprehensive income (loss)
attributable to noncontrolling-interest shareholders
8
12
(35
)
82
Other
(1
)
(9
)
(12
)
(61
)
Net change in noncontrolling interests
$
(15
)
$
(100
)
$
(73
)
$
(35
)
Balance, end of period
$
859
$
988
$
859
$
988
Total equity
$
197,863
$
228,622
$
197,863
$
228,622
(1)
See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details.
(2)
Common dividends declared were
$0.32
per share in the first and second quarters and
$0.45
per share in the third quarter of 2018. Common dividends declared were
$0.16
per share in the first and second quarters and
$0.32
for the third quarter of 2017.
(3)
Includes the impact of ASU 2016-09,
Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting
. See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
86
(4)
Includes treasury stock related to (i) certain activity on employee stock option program exercises where the employee delivers existing shares to cover the option exercise, or (ii) under Citi’s employee restricted or deferred stock programs where shares are withheld to satisfy tax requirements.
(5)
For the three and
nine months ended
September 30, 2018
and
2017
, primarily consists of open market purchases under Citi’s Board of Directors-approved common stock repurchase program.
The Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
87
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
Citigroup Inc. and Subsidiaries
(UNAUDITED)
Nine Months Ended September 30,
In millions of dollars
2018
2017
Cash flows from operating activities of continuing operations
Net income before attribution of noncontrolling interests
$
13,783
$
12,136
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
51
41
Citigroup’s net income
$
13,732
$
12,095
Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes
—
(2
)
Income from continuing operations—excluding noncontrolling interests
$
13,732
$
12,097
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities of continuing operations
Net gains on significant disposals
(1)
(247
)
(602
)
Depreciation and amortization
2,800
2,717
Provision for loan losses
5,504
5,487
Realized gains from sales of investments
(341
)
(626
)
Net impairment losses on investments, goodwill and intangible assets
113
75
Change in trading account assets
(4,831
)
(14,383
)
Change in trading account liabilities
22,482
(1,015
)
Change in brokerage receivables net of brokerage payables
9,709
(3,136
)
Change in loans HFS
1,380
1,969
Change in other assets
(8,696
)
(5,351
)
Change in other liabilities
(848
)
1,569
Other, net
(10,691
)
(2,262
)
Total adjustments
$
16,334
$
(15,558
)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities of continuing operations
$
30,066
$
(3,461
)
Cash flows from investing activities of continuing operations
Change in federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell
$
(48,462
)
$
(15,795
)
Change in loans
(16,131
)
(41,569
)
Proceeds from sales and securitizations of loans
4,021
7,019
Purchases of investments
(129,054
)
(151,362
)
Proceeds from sales of investments
52,170
89,724
Proceeds from maturities of investments
82,940
67,166
Proceeds from significant disposals
(1)
314
3,411
Capital expenditures on premises and equipment and capitalized software
(2,682
)
(2,502
)
Proceeds from sales of premises and equipment, subsidiaries and affiliates
and repossessed assets
174
292
Other, net
147
156
Net cash used in investing activities of continuing operations
$
(56,563
)
$
(43,460
)
Cash flows from financing activities of continuing operations
Dividends paid
$
(3,616
)
$
(2,639
)
Redemption of preferred stock
(218
)
—
Treasury stock acquired
(9,848
)
(9,071
)
Stock tendered for payment of withholding taxes
(479
)
(402
)
Change in federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase
19,638
19,461
Issuance of long-term debt
53,027
52,293
Payments and redemptions of long-term debt
(47,201
)
(29,785
)
Change in deposits
45,354
34,632
Change in short-term borrowings
(10,681
)
7,448
88
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
Nine Months Ended September 30,
In millions of dollars
2018
2017
Net cash provided by financing activities of continuing operations
$
45,976
$
71,937
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and due from banks
$
(709
)
$
599
Change in cash and due from banks and deposits with banks
(2)
$
18,770
$
25,615
Cash, due from banks and deposits with banks at beginning of period
(2)
180,516
160,494
Cash, due from banks and deposits with banks at end of period
(2)
$
199,286
$
186,109
Cash and due from banks
$
25,727
$
22,604
Deposits with banks
173,559
163,505
Cash, due from banks and deposits with banks at end of period
$
199,286
$
186,109
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information for continuing operations
Cash paid during the period for income taxes
$
3,261
$
2,714
Cash paid during the period for interest
16,278
11,604
Non-cash investing activities
Transfers to loans HFS from loans
$
3,300
$
3,800
Transfers to OREO and other repossessed assets
94
85
(1) See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on significant disposals.
(2) Includes the impact of ASU 2016-18,
Restricted Cash
. See Notes 1 and 22 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
The Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
89
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND ACCOUNTING CHANGES
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements as of
September 30, 2018
and for the three- and nine-month periods ended
September 30, 2018
and
2017
include the accounts of Citigroup Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.
In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation have been reflected. The accompanying unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes included in Citigroup’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2017
(2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K) and Citigroup’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended June 30, 2018 (Second Quarter of 2018 Form 10-Q) and March 31, 2018 (First Quarter of 2018 Form 10-Q).
Certain financial information that is normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), but is not required for interim reporting purposes, has been condensed or omitted.
Management must make estimates and assumptions that affect the Consolidated Financial Statements and the related footnote disclosures. While management uses its best judgment, actual results could differ from those estimates.
As noted above, the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are unaudited.
Throughout these Notes, “Citigroup,” “Citi” and the “Company” refer to Citigroup Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.
Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior periods’ financial statements and notes to conform to the current period’s presentation.
ACCOUNTING CHANGES
Revenue Recognition
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued ASU 2014-09,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers
(Revenue Recognition), which outlines a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers. The core principle of the revenue model is that an entity recognizes revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The ASU defines the promised good or service as the performance obligation under the contract.
While the guidance replaces most existing revenue recognition guidance in GAAP, the ASU is not applicable to financial instruments and, therefore, does not impact a majority of the Company’s revenues, including net interest
income, loan fees, gains on sales and mark-to-market accounting.
In accordance with the new revenue recognition standard, Citi has identified the specific performance obligation (promised services) associated with the contract with the customer and has determined when that specific performance obligation has been satisfied, which may be at a point in time or over time depending on how the performance obligation is defined. The contracts with customers also contain the transaction price, which consists of fixed consideration and/or consideration that may vary (variable consideration), and is defined as the amount of consideration an entity expects to be entitled to when or as the performance obligation is satisfied, excluding amounts collected on behalf of third parties (including transaction taxes). The amounts recognized at the point in time the performance obligation is satisfied may differ from the ultimate transaction price associated with that performance obligation when a portion of it is based on variable consideration. For example, some consideration is based on the client’s month-end balance or market values which are unknown at the time the contract is executed. The remaining transaction price amount, if any, will be recognized as the variable consideration becomes determinable. In certain transactions, the performance obligation is considered satisfied at a point in time in the future. In this instance, Citi defers revenue on the balance sheet that will only be recognized upon completion of the performance obligation.
The new revenue recognition standard further clarified the guidance related to reporting revenue gross as principal versus net as an agent. In many cases, Citi outsources a component of its performance obligations to third parties. The Company has determined that it acts as principal in the majority of these transactions and therefore presents the amounts paid to these third parties gross within operating expenses.
The Company has retrospectively adopted this standard as of January 1, 2018 and as a result was required to report amounts paid to third parties where Citi is principal to the contract within
Operating expenses.
The adoption resulted in an increase in both revenue and expenses of approximately
$250 million
for the three-month period ended September 30, 2018 and approximately
$750 million
for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2018, respectively, while increasing approximately
$1 billion
for the year ended December 31, 2017 with similar amounts for prior periods. Prior to adoption, these expense amounts were reported as contra revenue primarily within
Commissions and fees
and
Administration and other fiduciary fees
revenue. Accordingly, prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the new presentation.
See Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a description of the Company’s revenue recognition policies for
Commissions and fees
and
Administration and other fiduciary fees
.
90
Income Tax Impact of Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets
In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-16,
Income Taxes—Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory
, which requires an entity to recognize the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory when the transfer occurs. The ASU was effective January 1, 2018 and was adopted as of that date. The impact of this standard was an increase of DTAs by approximately
$300 million
, a decrease of retained earnings by approximately
$80 million
and a decrease of prepaid tax assets by approximately
$380 million
.
Clarifying the Definition of a Business
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01,
Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business.
The definition of a business directly and indirectly affects many areas of accounting (e.g., acquisitions, disposals, goodwill and consolidation). The ASU narrows the definition of a business by introducing a quantitative screen as the first step, such that if substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets, then the set of transferred assets and activities is not a business. If the set is not scoped out from the quantitative screen, the entity then evaluates whether the set meets the requirement that a business include, at a minimum, an input and a substantive process that together significantly contribute to the ability to create outputs.
The ASU was effective for public entities, including Citi, as of January 1, 2018 with prospective application. The ongoing impact of the ASU will depend upon the acquisition and disposal activities of Citi. If fewer transactions qualify as a business, there could be less initial recognition of goodwill, but also less goodwill allocated to disposals.
Changes in Accounting for Pension and Postretirement (Benefit) Expense
In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-07,
Compensation—Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost
,
which changes the income statement presentation of net benefit expense and requires restating the Company’s financial statements for each of the earlier periods presented in Citi’s annual and interim financial statements. The change in presentation was effective for annual and interim periods starting January 1, 2018. The ASU requires that only the service cost component of net benefit expense be included in
Compensation and benefits
on the income statement. The other components of net benefit expense are required to be presented outside of
Compensation and benefits
and are presented in
Other operating expenses
. Since both of these income statement line items are part of
Operating expenses
, total
Operating expenses
and
Net income
will not change. This change in presentation did not have a material effect on
Compensation and benefits
and
Other operating expenses
and is applied prospectively. The components of
the net benefit expense are currently disclosed in Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
The new standard also changes the components of net benefit expense that are eligible for capitalization when employee costs are capitalized in connection with various activities, such as internally developed software, construction-in-progress and loan origination costs. Prospectively from January 1, 2018, only the service cost component of net benefit expense may be capitalized. Existing capitalized balances are not affected. This change in amounts eligible for capitalization does not have a material effect on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements and related disclosures.
Hedging
In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-12,
Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities
, which better aligns an entity’s risk management activities and financial reporting for hedging relationships through changes to the designation and measurement guidance for qualifying hedging relationships and the presentation of hedge results. The ASU requires the change in the fair value of the hedging instrument to be presented in the same income statement line as the hedged item and also requires expanded disclosures. Citi adopted this standard on January 1, 2018 and transferred approximately
$4 billion
of pre-payable mortgage-backed securities and municipal bonds from held-to-maturity (HTM) into available-for-sale (AFS) securities classification as permitted as a one-time transfer upon adoption of the standard, as these assets were deemed to be eligible to be hedged under the last of layer hedge strategy. The impact to opening retained earnings was immaterial. See Note 19 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information.
Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01,
Financial Instruments—Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
, which addresses certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of financial instruments. In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-03,
Technical Corrections and Improvements to Financial Instruments—Overall (Subtopic 825-10)
, to clarify certain provisions in ASU 2016-01.
The ASUs require entities to present separately in AOCI the portion of the total change in the fair value of a liability resulting from a change in the instrument-specific credit risk when the entity has elected to measure the liability at fair value in accordance with the fair value option for financial instruments. The ASUs also require equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting or those that result in consolidation of the investee) to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income, thus eliminating the AFS category for equity investments. However, Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank stock, as well as certain exchange seats, will continue to be presented at cost. The
91
ASUs also provide an instrument-by-instrument election to measure non-marketable equity investments using a measurement alternative. Under the measurement alternative, the investment is carried at cost plus or minus changes resulting from observable prices in orderly transactions for the identical or a similar investment of the same issuer. Equity securities under the measurement alternative are also assessed for impairment. Finally, the ASUs require that fair value disclosures for financial instruments not measured at fair value on the balance sheet be presented at their exit prices (e.g., held-for-investment loans).
Citi early adopted the provisions of ASU 2016-01
related to presentation of the change in fair value of liabilities for which the fair value option was elected, related to changes in Citigroup’s own credit spreads in
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
(AOCI) effective January 1, 2016. Accordingly, since the first quarter of 2016, these amounts have been reflected as a component of AOCI, whereas these amounts were previously recognized in Citigroup’s revenues and net income. The impact of adopting this amendment resulted in a cumulative catch-up reclassification from
Retained earnings
to AOCI of an accumulated after-tax loss of approximately
$15 million
at January 1, 2016. Financial statements for periods prior to 2016 were not subject to restatement under the provisions of this ASU. For additional information, see Notes 17, 20 and 21 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
The other provisions of ASU 2016-01, as discussed above, were effective on January 1, 2018. Citi has adopted both ASU 2016-01 and ASU 2018-03 as of January 1, 2018. Accordingly, as of the first quarter of 2018, the changes to accounting for equity securities and fair value disclosures have been reflected in Citigroup’s financial statements. The impact of adopting the change to AFS equity securities resulted in a cumulative catch-up reclassification from AOCI to
Retained earnings
of an accumulated after-tax gain of approximately
$3 million
at January 1, 2018. Citi elected the measurement alternative for all non-marketable equity investments that no longer qualify for cost measurement under the ASUs. This provision in the ASUs was adopted prospectively. Financial statements for periods prior to 2018 were not subject to restatement under the provisions of the ASUs. For additional information, see Notes 12, 17 and 20
to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Statement of Cash Flows
In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18,
Restricted Cash
,
which requires that companies present cash, cash equivalents and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents (restricted cash) when reconciling beginning-of-period and end-of-period totals on the Statement of Cash Flows. In connection with the adoption of the ASU, Citigroup also changed its definition of cash and cash equivalents to include all of
Cash and due from banks
and predominately all of
Deposits with banks.
The Company has retrospectively adopted this ASU as of January 1, 2018 and as a result
Net cash provided by investing activities of continuing operations
on the
Statement of Cash Flows increased by
$26.1 billion
for the nine months ended September 30, 2017.
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15,
Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments
,
which provides guidance on the classification and presentation of certain cash receipts and payments on the Statement of Cash Flows. The Company has retrospectively adopted this ASU as of January 1, 2018, which resulted in immaterial changes to Citi’s Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows.
Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities
In March 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2017-08,
Receivables—Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Subtopic 310-20): Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities
, which amends the amortization period for certain purchased callable debt securities held at a premium. The ASU requires entities to amortize premiums on debt securities by the first call date when the securities have fixed and determinable call dates and prices. The scope of the ASU includes all accounting premiums, such as purchase premiums and cumulative fair value hedge adjustments. The ASU does not change the accounting for discounts, which continue to be recognized over the contractual life of a security.
Citi early adopted the ASU in the second quarter of 2017, with an effective date of January 1, 2017. Adoption of the ASU is on a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative effect adjustment to
Retained earnings
as of the beginning of the year of adoption. Adoption of the ASU primarily affected Citi’s AFS and HTM portfolios of callable state and municipal debt securities. The ASU adoption resulted in a net reduction to total stockholders’ equity of
$156 million
(after-tax), effective as of January 1, 2017. This amount is composed of a reduction of approximately
$660 million
to
Retained earnings
for the incremental amortization of purchase premiums and cumulative hedge adjustments generated under fair value hedges of these callable debt securities, offset by an increase to AOCI of
$504 million
related to the cumulative fair value hedge adjustments reclassified to
Retained earnings
for AFS debt securities.
92
2. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS AND SIGNIFICANT DISPOSALS
Summary of Discontinued Operations
Citi sold its German retail banking operations and Egg Banking plc credit card business in 2008 and 2011, respectively. Residual items from these disposals are summarized below. All
Discontinued operations
results are recorded within
Corporate/Other.
Three Months Ended
September 30,
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
In millions of dollars
2018
2017
2018
2017
Total revenues, net of interest expense
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
Loss from discontinued operations
$
(8
)
$
(9
)
$
(17
)
$
(4
)
Benefit for income taxes
—
(4
)
(17
)
(2
)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes
$
(8
)
$
(5
)
$
—
$
(2
)
Cash flows for discontinued operations were not material for the periods presented.
Significant Disposals
During the third quarter of 2018, one previously disclosed significant disposal transaction was completed as summarized below. There were no new significant disposal transactions during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018. For a description of the Company’s significant disposal transactions and financial impact, see Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Citi’s 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Sale of Mexico Asset Management Business
On September 21, 2018, Citi completed the sale of its Mexico asset management business, which was part of
Latin America Global Consumer Banking (GCB)
. As part of the sale, Citi derecognized net assets of
$96 million
, including goodwill of
$32 million
, already classified as held-for-sale beginning in the fourth quarter of 2017. The transaction resulted in a pretax gain on sale of approximately
$250 million
(approximately
$150 million
after-tax) recorded in
Other revenue
in the third quarter of 2018.
Income before taxes, excluding the pretax gain on sale, of the divested business was immaterial for the periods presented. Going forward, revenues in
Latin America GCB
will reflect the loss of ongoing operating revenues from the Mexico asset management business. However, this impact should be partially offset by lower operating expenses related to the asset management business, as well as expected growth in distribution revenues resulting from the transaction over time.
93
3. BUSINESS SEGMENTS
Citigroup’s activities are conducted through the following business segments:
GCB
and
Institutional Clients Group (ICG)
. In addition,
Corporate/Other
includes activities not assigned to a specific business segment, as well as certain
North America
and international loan portfolios, discontinued operations and other legacy assets.
The prior-period balances reflect reclassifications to conform the presentation for all periods to the current period’s presentation. Effective January 1, 2018, financial data was reclassified to reflect:
•
adoption of ASU No. 2014-09,
Revenue Recognition
, which occurred on January 1, 2018 on a retrospective basis. See “Accounting Changes” in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements;
•
the re-attribution of certain costs between
Corporate/Other
and
GCB
and
ICG
; and
•
certain other immaterial reclassifications.
Citi’s consolidated results remain unchanged for all periods presented as a result of the changes and reclassifications discussed above.
For additional information regarding Citigroup’s business segments, see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Citi’s
2017
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The following table presents certain information regarding the Company’s continuing operations by segment:
Three Months Ended September 30,
Revenues,
net of interest expense
(1)
Provision (benefits)
for income taxes
Income (loss) from
continuing operations
(2)
Identifiable assets
In millions of dollars, except identifiable assets in billions
2018
2017
2018
2017
2018
2017
September 30,
2018
December 31, 2017
Global Consumer Banking
$
8,654
$
8,470
$
493
$
635
$
1,567
$
1,170
$
427
$
428
Institutional Clients Group
9,241
9,430
862
1,394
3,117
3,062
1,404
1,336
Corporate/Other
494
519
116
(163
)
(51
)
(95
)
94
78
Total
$
18,389
$
18,419
$
1,471
$
1,866
$
4,633
$
4,137
$
1,925
$
1,842
(1)
Includes total revenues, net of interest expense (excluding
Corporate/Other
), in
North America
of
$8.5 billion
and
$8.9 billion
; in
EMEA
of
$2.9 billion
and
$2.7 billion
; in
Latin America
of
$2.7 billion
and
$2.5 billion
; and in
Asia
of
$3.8 billion
and
$3.8 billion
for the three months ended
September 30, 2018
and
2017
, respectively. These regional numbers exclude
Corporate/Other
, which largely operates within the U.S.
(2)
Includes pretax provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims in the
GCB
results of
$1.9 billion
and
$2.2 billion
; in the
ICG
results of
$71 million
and
$(164) million
; and in the
Corporate/Other
results of
$(30) million
and
$(50) million
for the three months ended
September 30, 2018
and
2017
, respectively.
Nine Months Ended September 30,
Revenues,
net of interest expense
(1)
Provision (benefits)
for income taxes
Income (loss) from
continuing operations
(2)
In millions of dollars
2018
2017
2018
2017
2018
2017
Global Consumer Banking
$
25,337
$
24,389
$
1,357
$
1,863
$
4,240
$
3,296
Institutional Clients Group
28,780
28,170
2,890
4,096
9,683
8,853
Corporate/Other
1,613
2,381
109
(435
)
(140
)
(11
)
Total
$
55,730
$
54,940
$
4,356
$
5,524
$
13,783
$
12,138
(1)
Includes total revenues, net of interest expense, in
North America
of
$25.4 billion
and
$26.0 billion
; in
EMEA
of
$9.1 billion
and
$8.4 billion
; in
Latin America
of
$7.8 billion
and
$7.2 billion
; and in
Asia
of
$11.8 billion
and
$10.9 billion
for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2018
and
2017
, respectively. Regional numbers exclude
Corporate/Other
, which largely operates within the U.S.
(2)
Includes pretax provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims in the
GCB
results of
$5.7 billion
and
$5.8 billion
; in the
ICG
results of
$55 million
and
$(282) million
; and in
Corporate/Other
results of
$(155) million
and
$(130) million
for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2018
and
2017
, respectively.
94
4. INTEREST REVENUE AND EXPENSE
Interest revenue
and
Interest expense
consisted of the following:
Three Months Ended September 30,
Nine Months Ended September 30,
In millions of dollars
2018
2017
2018
2017
Interest revenue
Loan interest, including fees
$
11,639
$
10,745
$
33,721
$
31,082
Deposits with banks
629
486
1,554
1,156
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell
1,425
858
3,800
2,348
Investments, including dividends
2,388
2,104
6,996
6,122
Trading account assets
(1)
1,655
1,429
4,789
4,175
Other interest
434
292
1,192
846
Total interest revenue
$
18,170
$
15,914
$
52,052
$
45,729
Interest expense
Deposits
(2)
$
2,580
$
1,775
$
6,821
$
4,793
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase
1,250
712
3,423
1,881
Trading account liabilities
(1)
273
169
724
462
Short-term borrowings
578
318
1,572
719
Long-term debt
1,687
1,405
4,873
4,126
Total interest expense
$
6,368
$
4,379
$
17,413
$
11,981
Net interest revenue
$
11,802
$
11,535
$
34,639
$
33,748
Provision for loan losses
1,906
2,146
5,504
5,487
Net interest revenue after provision for loan losses
$
9,896
$
9,389
$
29,135
$
28,261
(1)
Interest expense on
Trading account liabilities
is reported as a reduction of interest revenue from
Trading account assets
.
(2)
Includes deposit insurance fees and charges of
$311 million
and
$301 million
for the three months ended
September 30, 2018
and
2017
, respectively, and
$1,006 million
and
$935 million
for the nine months ended
September 30, 2018
and
2017
, respectively.
95
5. COMMISSIONS AND FEES; ADMINISTRATION
AND OTHER FIDUCIARY FEES
The primary components of
Commissions and fees
revenue are investment banking fees, brokerage commissions, credit- and bank-card income and deposit-related fees.
Investment banking fees are substantially composed of underwriting and advisory revenues. Such fees are recognized at the point in time when Citigroup’s performance under the terms of a contractual arrangement is completed, which is typically at the closing of a transaction. Reimbursed expenses related to these transactions are recorded as revenue and are included within investment banking fees. In certain instances for advisory contracts, Citi will receive amounts in advance of the deal’s closing. In these instances, the amounts received will be recognized as a liability and not recognized in revenue until the transaction closes. The contract liability amount for the periods presented was negligible. Out-of-pocket expenses associated with underwriting activity are deferred and recognized at the time the related revenue is recognized, while out-of-pocket expenses associated with advisory arrangements are expensed as incurred. In general, expenses incurred related to investment banking transactions, whether consummated or not, are recorded in
Other operating expenses
. The Company has determined that it acts as principal in the majority of these transactions and therefore presents expenses gross within
Other operating expenses
.
Brokerage commissions primarily include commissions and fees from the following: executing transactions for clients on exchanges and over-the-counter markets; sales of mutual funds and other annuity products; and assisting clients in clearing transactions, providing brokerage services and other such activities. Brokerage commissions are recognized in
Commissions and fees
at the point in time the associated service is fulfilled, generally on trade-execution date. Gains or losses, if any, on these transactions are included in
Principal transactions
(see Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements). Sales of certain investment products include a portion of variable consideration associated with the underlying product. In these instances, a portion of the revenue associated with the sale of the product is not recognized until the variable consideration becomes fixed. The Company recognized
$130 million
and
$107 million
of revenue related to such variable consideration for the three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and
$402 million
and
$302 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. These amounts primarily relate to performance obligations satisfied in prior periods.
Credit- and bank-card income is primarily composed of interchange fees, which are earned by card issuers based on purchase sales, and certain card fees, including annual fees. Costs related to customer reward programs and certain payments to partners (primarily based on program sales, profitability and customer acquisitions) are recorded as a reduction of credit- and bank-card income. Interchange revenues are recognized as earned on a daily basis when Citi's performance obligation to transmit funds to the payment networks has been satisfied. Annual card fees, net of origination costs, are deferred and amortized on a straight-line basis over a 12-month period. Costs related to card reward programs are recognized when the rewards are earned by the cardholders. Payments to partners are recognized when incurred.
Deposit-related fees consist of service charges on deposit accounts and fees earned from performing cash management activities and other deposit account services. Such fees are recognized in the period in which the related service is provided.
Transactional service fees primarily consist of fees charged for processing services such as cash management, global payments, clearing, international funds transfer and other trade services. Such fees are recognized as/when the associated service is satisfied, which normally occurs at the point in time the service is requested by the customer and provided by Citi.
Insurance distribution revenue consists of commissions earned from third-party insurance companies for marketing and selling insurance policies on behalf of such entities. Such commissions are recognized in
Commissions and fees
at the point in time the associated service is fulfilled, generally when the insurance policy is sold to the policyholder. Sales of certain insurance products include a portion of variable consideration associated with the underlying product. In these instances, a portion of the revenue associated with the sale of the policy is not recognized until the variable consideration becomes determinable. The Company recognized
$92 million
and
$115 million
for the three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and
$296 million
and
$342 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. These amounts primarily relate to performance obligations in prior periods.
Insurance premiums consist of premium income from insurance policies that Citi has underwritten and sold to policyholders.
96
The following tables present
Commissions and fees
revenue:
Three Months Ended September 30,
Nine Months Ended September 30,
2018
2018
In millions of dollars
ICG
GCB
Corporate/Other
Total
ICG
GCB
Corporate/Other
Total
Investment banking
$
856
$
—
$
—
$
856
$
2,695
$
—
$
—
$
2,695
Brokerage commissions
453
199
—
652
1,510
654
—
2,164
Credit- and bank-card income
Interchange fees
268
2,063
1
2,332
804
5,963
11
6,778
Card-related loan fees
16
172
—
188
47
474
12
533
Card rewards and partner payments
(125
)
(2,130
)
—
(2,255
)
(375
)
(6,070
)
(11
)
(6,456
)
Deposit-related fees
(1)
239
160
—
399
711
503
1
1,215
Transactional service fees
171
22
1
194
543
64
4
611
Corporate finance
(2)
145
1
—
146
506
4
—
510
Insurance distribution revenue
(3)
3
144
(4
)
143
13
429
6
448
Insurance premiums
(3)
—
31
(2
)
29
—
96
(4
)
92
Loan servicing
42
27
8
77
118
89
31
238
Other
10
29
3
42
20
90
6
116
Total commissions and fees
(4)
$
2,078
$
718
$
7
$
2,803
$
6,592
$
2,296
$
56
$
8,944
Three Months Ended September 30,
Nine Months Ended September 30,
2017
2017
In millions of dollars
ICG
GCB
Corporate/Other
Total
ICG
GCB
Corporate/Other
Total
Investment banking
$
961
$
—
$
—
$
961
$
2,840
$
—
$
—
$
2,840
Brokerage commissions
459
222
1
682
1,431
615
3
2,049
Credit- and bank-card income
Interchange fees
242
1,912
24
2,178
705
5,507
87
6,299
Card-related loan fees
13
172
13
198
39
526
41
606
Card rewards and partner payments
(105
)
(1,822
)
(8
)
(1,935
)
(316
)
(5,352
)
(49
)
(5,717
)
Deposit-related fees
(1)
249
188
4
441
696
554
12
1,262
Transactional service fees
185
21
11
217
556
74
44
674
Corporate finance
(2)
183
2
—
185
616
4
—
620
Insurance distribution revenue
(3)
5
142
17
164
10
425
58
493
Insurance premiums
(3)
—
32
(1
)
31
—
97
(4
)
93
Loan servicing
38
25
25
88
109
79
89
277
Other
2
25
4
31
(36
)
64
28
56
Total commissions and fees
(4)
$
2,232
$
919
$
90
$
3,241
$
6,650
$
2,593
$
309
$
9,552
(1)
Includes overdraft fees of
$33 million
and
$35 million
for the three months ended
September 30, 2018
and
2017
, respectively, and
$95 million
and
$101 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Overdraft fees are accounted for under ASC 310.
(2)
Consists primarily of fees earned from structuring and underwriting loan syndications or related financing activity. This activity is accounted for under ASC 310.
(3)
Previously reported as insurance premiums on the Consolidated Statement of Income.
(4)
Commissions and fees
includes
$(1,774)
million and
$(1,398) million
not accounted for under ASC 606,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers
, for the three months ended
September 30, 2018
and
2017
, respectively, and
$(4,967) million
and
$(4,023) million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Amounts reported in
Commissions and fees
accounted for under other guidance primarily include card-related loan fees, card reward programs and certain partner payments, corporate finance fees, insurance premiums and loan servicing fees.
97
Administration and Other Fiduciary Fees
Administration and other fiduciary fees are primarily composed of custody fees and fiduciary fees.
The custody product is composed of numerous services related to the administration, safekeeping and reporting for both U.S. and non-U.S. denominated securities. The services offered to clients include trade settlement, safekeeping, income collection, corporate action notification, record-keeping and reporting, tax reporting and cash management. These services are provided for a wide range of securities, including but not limited to equities, municipal and corporate bonds, mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities, money market instruments, U.S. Treasuries and agencies, derivative instruments, mutual funds, alternative investments and precious metals. Custody fees are recognized as/when the associated promised service is satisfied, which normally occurs at the point in time the service is requested by the customer and provided by Citi.
Fiduciary fees consist of trust services and investment management services. As an escrow agent, Citi receives, safe-
keeps, services and manages clients’ escrowed assets such as cash, securities, property (including intellectual property), contracts or other collateral. Citi performs its escrow agent duties by safekeeping the funds during the specified time period agreed upon by all parties and therefore earns its revenue evenly during the contract duration.
Investment management services consist of managing assets on behalf of Citi’s retail and institutional clients. Revenue from these services primarily consists of asset-based fees for advisory accounts, which are based on the market value of the client’s assets and recognized monthly, when the market value is fixed. In some instances, the Company contracts with third-party advisors and with third-party custodians. The Company has determined that it acts as principal in the majority of these transactions and therefore presents the amounts paid to third parties gross within
Other operating expenses
.
The following table presents
Administration and other fiduciary fees
:
Three Months Ended September 30,
Nine Months Ended September 30,
2018
2018
In millions of dollars
ICG
GCB
Corporate/Other
Total
ICG
GCB
Corporate/Other
Total
Custody fees
$
371
$
41
$
18
$
430
$
1,138
$
133
$
50
$
1,321
Fiduciary fees
160
158
12
330
492
455
31
978
Guarantee fees
136
14
1
151
403
43
5
451
Total administration and other fiduciary fees
(1)
$
667
$
213
$
31
$
911
$
2,033
$
631
$
86
$
2,750
Three Months Ended September 30,
Nine Months Ended September 30,
2017
2017
In millions of dollars
ICG
GCB
Corporate/Other
Total
ICG
GCB
Corporate/Other
Total
Custody fees
$
397
$
44
$
14
$
455
$
1,135
$
123
$
41
$
1,299
Fiduciary fees
149
157
18
324
437
431
59
927
Guarantee fees
134
13
3
150
400
39
7
446
Total administration and other fiduciary fees
(1)
$
680
$
214
$
35
$
929
$
1,972
$
593
$
107
$
2,672
(1)
Administration and other fiduciary fees
includes
$151 million
and
$150 million
for the three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and
$451 million
and
$446 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, that are not accounted for under ASC 606,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers.
These amounts include guarantee fees.
98
6. PRINCIPAL TRANSACTIONS
Principal transactions
revenue consists of realized and unrealized gains and losses from trading activities. Trading activities include revenues from fixed income, equities, credit and commodities products and foreign exchange transactions that are managed on a portfolio basis characterized by primary risk. Not included in the table below is the impact of net interest revenue related to trading activities, which is an
integral part of trading activities’ profitability. See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for information about net interest revenue related to trading activities. Principal transactions include CVA (credit valuation adjustments on derivatives) and FVA (funding valuation adjustments) on over-the-counter derivatives. These adjustments are discussed further in Note 20 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
In certain transactions, Citi incurs fees and presents these fees paid to third parties in operating expenses.
The following table presents
Principal transactions
revenue:
Three Months Ended September 30,
Nine Months Ended September 30,
In millions of dollars
2018
2017
2018
2017
Interest rate risks
(1)
$
1,403
$
1,180
$
4,576
$
4,421
Foreign exchange risks
(2)
467
606
1,387
1,942
Equity risks
(3)
311
154
997
440
Commodity and other risks
(4)
244
112
544
434
Credit products and risks
(5)
141
196
502
748
Total
$
2,566
$
2,248
$
8,006
$
7,985
(1)
Includes revenues from government securities and corporate debt, municipal securities, mortgage securities and other debt instruments. Also includes spot and forward trading of currencies and exchange-traded and over-the-counter (OTC) currency options, options on fixed income securities, interest rate swaps, currency swaps, swap options, caps and floors, financial futures, OTC options and forward contracts on fixed income securities.
(2)
Includes revenues from foreign exchange spot, forward, option and swap contracts, as well as foreign currency translation (FX translation) gains and losses.
(3)
Includes revenues from common, preferred and convertible preferred stock, convertible corporate debt, equity-linked notes and exchange-traded and OTC equity options and warrants.
(4)
Primarily includes revenues from crude oil, refined oil products, natural gas and other commodities trades.
(5)
Includes revenues from structured credit products.
99
7. INCENTIVE PLANS
For additional information on Citi’s incentive plans, see Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Citi’s
2017
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
8. RETIREMENT BENEFITS
For additional information on Citi’s retirement benefits, see Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Citi’s
2017
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Net (Benefit) Expense
The following table summarizes the components of net (benefit) expense recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Income for the Company’s pension and postretirement plans for Significant Plans and All Other Plans:
Three Months Ended September 30,
Pension plans
Postretirement benefit plans
U.S. plans
Non-U.S. plans
U.S. plans
Non-U.S. plans
In millions of dollars
2018
2017
2018
2017
2018
2017
2018
2017
Benefits earned during the period
$
—
$
1
$
35
$
38
$
—
$
—
$
2
$
3
Interest cost on benefit obligation
132
131
73
76
6
9
26
27
Expected return on plan assets
(210
)
(217
)
(71
)
(77
)
(4
)
(2
)
(22
)
(24
)
Amortization of unrecognized:
Prior service benefit
—
—
(1
)
(1
)
—
—
(2
)
(2
)
Net actuarial loss
39
45
14
15
—
—
7
8
Curtailment loss
(1)
—
1
—
—
—
—
—
—
Settlement loss
(1)
—
—
—
4
—
—
—
—
Total net (benefit) expense
$
(39
)
$
(39
)
$
50
$
55
$
2
$
7
$
11
$
12
(1)
Losses due to curtailment and settlement relate to repositioning and divestiture activities.
Nine Months Ended September 30,
Pension plans
Postretirement benefit plans
U.S. plans
Non-U.S. plans
U.S. plans
Non-U.S. plans
In millions of dollars
2018
2017
2018
2017
2018
2017
2018
2017
Benefits earned during the period
$
1
$
2
$
111
$
112
$
—
$
—
$
7
$
7
Interest cost on benefit obligation
381
406
220
221
19
20
77
76
Expected return on plan assets
(634
)
(650
)
(221
)
(223
)
(10
)
(5
)
(67
)
(67
)
Amortization of unrecognized:
Prior service benefit
—
1
(3
)
(3
)
—
—
(7
)
(7
)
Net actuarial loss
128
129
41
46
—
—
22
25
Curtailment loss
(1)
1
4
—
—
—
—
—
—
Settlement loss
(1)
—
—
5
8
—
—
—
—
Total net (benefit) expense
$
(123
)
$
(108
)
$
153
$
161
$
9
$
15
$
32
$
34
(1)
Losses due to curtailment and settlement relate to repositioning and divestiture activities.
100
Funded Status and Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (AOCI)
The following tables summarize the funded status and amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheet for the Company’s
Significant Plans:
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018
Pension plans
Postretirement benefit plans
In millions of dollars
U.S. plans
Non-U.S. plans
U.S. plans
Non-U.S. plans
Change in projected benefit obligation
Projected benefit obligation at beginning of year
$
14,040
$
7,433
$
699
$
1,261
Plans measured annually
(28
)
(1,987
)
—
(334
)
Projected benefit obligation at beginning of year—Significant Plans
$
14,012
$
5,446
$
699
$
927
First quarter activity
(576
)
151
(32
)
89
Second quarter activity
(595
)
(344
)
—
(65
)
Projected benefit obligation at June 30, 2018—Significant Plans
$
12,841
$
5,253
$
667
$
951
Benefits earned during the period
—
20
—
2
Interest cost on benefit obligation
132
60
6
23
Actuarial gain
(60
)
(59
)
—
(61
)
Benefits paid, net of participants’ contributions and government subsidy
(217
)
(68
)
(15
)
(14
)
Foreign exchange impact and other
—
48
—
48
Projected benefit obligation at period end—Significant Plans
$
12,696
$
5,254
$
658
$
949
101
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018
Pension plans
Postretirement benefit plans
In millions of dollars
U.S. plans
Non-U.S. plans
U.S. plans
Non-U.S. plans
Change in plan assets
Plan assets at fair value at beginning of year
$
12,725
$
7,128
$
262
$
1,119
Plans measured annually
—
(1,305
)
—
(10
)
Plan assets at fair value at beginning of year—Significant Plans
$
12,725
$
5,823
$
262
$
1,109
First quarter activity
(349
)
115
(21
)
58
Second quarter activity
(220
)
(328
)
(4
)
(78
)
Plan assets at fair value at June 30, 2018
—
Significant Plans
$
12,156
$
5,610
$
237
$
1,089
Actual return on plan assets
123
7
1
23
Company contributions, net of reimbursements
13
15
153
—
Benefits paid, net of participants’ contributions and government subsidy
(217
)
(68
)
(15
)
(14
)
Foreign exchange impact and other
—
40
—
56
Plan assets at fair value at period end—Significant Plans
$
12,075
$
5,604
$
376
$
1,154
Funded status of the Significant Plans
Qualified plans
(1)
$
36
$
350
$
(282
)
$
205
Nonqualified plans
(657
)
—
—
—
Funded status of the plans at period end—Significant Plans
$
(621
)
$
350
$
(282
)
$
205
Net amount recognized at period end
Benefit asset
$
36
$
850
$
—
$
205
Benefit liability
(657
)
(500
)
(282
)
—
Net amount recognized on the balance sheet—Significant Plans
$
(621
)
$
350
$
(282
)
$
205
Amounts recognized in AOCI at period end
Prior service benefit
$
—
$
25
$
—
$
80
Net actuarial (loss) gain
(6,313
)
(807
)
77
(284
)
Net amount recognized in equity (pretax)—Significant Plans
$
(6,313
)
$
(782
)
$
77
$
(204
)
Accumulated benefit obligation at period end—Significant Plans
$
12,689
$
4,980
$
658
$
949
(1)
The U.S. qualified pension plan is fully funded pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA), funding rules as of January 1,
2018
and no minimum required funding is expected for
2018
.
The following table shows the change in AOCI related to the Company’s pension, postretirement and post employment plans:
In millions of dollars
Three Months Ended
September 30, 2018
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2018
Beginning of period balance, net of tax
(1)(2)
$
(5,794
)
$
(6,183
)
Actuarial assumptions changes and plan experience
181
1,300
Net asset loss due to difference between actual and expected returns
(140
)
(919
)
Net amortization
49
161
Curtailment/settlement gain
(3)
—
6
Foreign exchange impact and other
(35
)
1
Change in deferred taxes, net
(29
)
(134
)
Change, net of tax
$
26
$
415
End of period balance, net of tax
(1)(2)
$
(5,768
)
$
(5,768
)
(1)
See Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of net AOCI balance.
(2)
Includes net-of-tax amounts for certain profit sharing plans outside the U.S.
(3)
Gains due to curtailment and settlement relate to repositioning and divestiture activities.
102
Plan Assumptions
The discount rates utilized during the period in determining the pension and postretirement net (benefit) expense for the Significant Plans are as follows:
Net (benefit) expense assumed discount rates during the period
Three Months Ended
Sept. 30, 2018
Jun. 30, 2018
U.S. plans
Qualified pension
4.25%
3.95%
Nonqualified pension
4.25
3.95
Postretirement
4.20
3.90
Non-U.S. plans
Pension
0.80-10.70
0.75-9.90
Weighted average
4.88
4.86
Postretirement
9.50
9.50
The discount rates utilized at period-end in determining the pension and postretirement benefit obligations for the Significant Plans are as follows:
Plan obligations assumed discount rates at period ended
Sept. 30, 2018
Jun. 30, 2018
Mar. 31, 2018
U.S. plans
Qualified pension
4.30%
4.25%
3.95%
Nonqualified pension
4.30
4.25
3.95
Postretirement
4.20
4.20
3.90
Non-U.S. plans
Pension
0.95-10.75
0.80-10.70
0.75-9.90
Weighted average
5.08
4.88
4.86
Postretirement
10.10
9.50
9.50
Sensitivities of Certain Key Assumptions
The following table summarizes the estimated effect on the Company’s Significant Plans quarterly expense of a one-percentage-point change in the discount rate:
Three Months Ended September 30, 2018
In millions of dollars
One-percentage-point increase
One-percentage-point decrease
Pension
U.S. plans
$
5
$
(8
)
Non-U.S. plans
(3
)
5
Postretirement
U.S. plans
—
(1
)
Non-U.S. plans
(2
)
2
Contributions
For the U.S. pension plans, there were
no
required minimum cash contributions during the first
nine
months of
2018
.
The following table summarizes the Company’s actual contributions for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2018
and
2017
, as well as estimated expected Company contributions for the remainder of 2018 and the actual contributions made for the remainder of
2017
:
Pension plans
Postretirement plans
U.S. plans
(1)
Non-U.S. plans
U.S. plans
Non-U.S. plans
In millions of dollars
2018
2017
2018
2017
2018
2017
2018
2017
Company contributions
(2)
for the nine months ended September 30
$
42
$
90
$
143
$
109
$
159
$
30
$
7
$
7
Company contributions made during the remainder
of the year
—
15
—
26
—
146
—
3
Company contributions expected to be made during
the remainder of the year
15
—
33
—
2
—
2
—
(1)
The U.S. pension plans include benefits paid directly by the Company for the nonqualified pension plans.
(2)
Company contributions are composed of cash contributions made to the plans and benefits paid directly by the Company.
103
Defined Contribution Plans
The following table summarizes the Company’s contributions for the defined contribution plans:
Three Months Ended September 30,
Nine Months Ended September 30,
In millions of dollars
2018
2017
2018
2017
U.S. plans
$
90
$
95
$
293
$
293
Non-U.S. plans
68
68
216
203
Post Employment Plans
The following table summarizes the components of net expense recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Income for the Company’s U.S. post employment plans:
Three Months Ended September 30,
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
In millions of dollars
2018
2017
2018
2017
Interest cost on benefit obligation
$
—
$
—
$
1
$
1
Expected return on plan assets
—
—
(1
)
—
Amortization of unrecognized:
Prior service
benefit
(8
)
(8
)
(23
)
(23
)
Net actuarial
loss
1
1
2
2
Total service-
related benefit
$
(7
)
$
(7
)
$
(21
)
$
(20
)
Non-service-
related expense
$
4
$
9
$
7
$
21
Total net
(benefit) expense
$
(3
)
$
2
$
(14
)
$
1
104
9. EARNINGS PER SHARE
The following table reconciles the income and share data used in the basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) computations:
Three Months Ended September 30,
Nine Months Ended September 30,
In millions of dollars, except per share amounts
2018
2017
2018
2017
Income from continuing operations before attribution of noncontrolling interests
$
4,633
$
4,137
$
13,783
$
12,138
Less: Noncontrolling interests from continuing operations
3
(1
)
51
41
Net income from continuing operations (for EPS purposes)
$
4,630
$
4,138
$
13,732
$
12,097
Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes
(8
)
(5
)
—
(2
)
Citigroup's net income
$
4,622
$
4,133
$
13,732
$
12,095
Less: Preferred dividends
(1)
270
272
860
893
Net income available to common shareholders
$
4,352
$
3,861
$
12,872
$
11,202
Less: Dividends and undistributed earnings allocated to employee restricted and deferred shares with nonforfeitable rights to dividends, applicable to basic EPS
51
53
151
156
Net income allocated to common shareholders for basic EPS
$
4,301
$
3,808
$
12,721
$
11,046
Net income allocated to common shareholders for diluted EPS
4,301
3,808
12,721
11,046
Weighted-average common shares outstanding applicable to basic EPS
(in millions)
2,479.8
2,683.6
2,524.1
2,729.3
Effect of dilutive securities
(2)
Options
(3)
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
Other employee plans
1.4
—
1.3
—
Adjusted weighted-average common shares outstanding applicable to diluted EPS
(4)
2,481.4
2,683.7
2,525.5
2,729.5
Basic earnings per share
(5)
Income from continuing operations
$
1.74
$
1.42
$
5.04
$
4.05
Discontinued operations
—
—
—
—
Net income
$
1.73
$
1.42
$
5.04
$
4.05
Diluted earnings per share
(5)
Income from continuing operations
$
1.74
$
1.42
$
5.04
$
4.05
Discontinued operations
—
—
—
—
Net income
$
1.73
$
1.42
$
5.04
$
4.05
(1)
As of
September 30, 2018
, Citi estimates it will distribute preferred dividends of approximately
$313 million
during the remainder of 2018, assuming such dividends are declared by the Citi Board of Directors. During the first nine months of 2018, Citi redeemed all of its
3.8 million
Series AA preferred shares for
$96.8 million
and all of its
4.9 million
Series E preferred shares for
$121.3 million
. All preferred shares were redeemed at par value. Citi redeemed all of its
23 million
Series C preferred shares for
$575 million
in October 2018.
(2)
Warrants issued to the U.S. Treasury as part of the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) and the loss-sharing agreement (all of which were subsequently sold to the public in January 2011), with exercise prices of
$178.50
and
$103.82
per share for approximately
21.0 million
and
25.5 million
shares of Citigroup common stock, respectively. Both warrants were not included in the computation of earnings per share in the
three and nine months ended
September 30, 2018
and
2017
because they were anti-dilutive.
(3)
During the third quarters of
2018
and
2017
, weighted-average options to purchase
0.5 million
and
0.8 million
shares of common stock, respectively, were outstanding, but not included in the computation of earnings per share because the weighted-average exercise prices of
$142.30
and
$206.70
per share, respectively, were anti-dilutive.
(4)
Due to rounding, common shares outstanding applicable to basic EPS and the effect of dilutive securities may not sum to common shares outstanding applicable to diluted EPS.
(5)
Due to rounding, earnings per share on continuing operations and discontinued operations may not sum to earnings per share on net income.
105
10. FEDERAL FUNDS, SECURITIES BORROWED, LOANED AND SUBJECT TO REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS
For additional information on the Company’s resale and repurchase agreements and securities borrowing and lending agreements, see Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Citi’s
2017
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed and purchased under agreements to resell
, at their respective carrying values, consisted of the following:
In millions of dollars
September 30,
2018
December 31, 2017
Federal funds sold
$
20
$
—
Securities purchased under agreements to resell
152,889
130,984
Deposits paid for securities borrowed
128,032
101,494
Total
(1)
$
280,941
$
232,478
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned and sold under agreements to repurchase
, at their respective carrying values, consisted of the following:
In millions of dollars
September 30,
2018
December 31, 2017
Federal funds purchased
$
117
$
326
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
161,987
142,646
Deposits received for securities loaned
13,811
13,305
Total
(1)
$
175,915
$
156,277
(1)
The above tables do not include securities-for-securities lending transactions of
$19.9 billion
and
$14.0 billion
at
September 30, 2018
and December 31, 2017, respectively, where the Company acts as lender and receives securities that can be sold or pledged as collateral. In these transactions, the Company recognizes the securities received at fair value within
Other assets
and the obligation to return those securities as a liability within
Brokerage payables
.
It is the Company’s policy to take possession of the underlying collateral, monitor its market value relative to the amounts due under the agreements and, when necessary, require prompt transfer of additional collateral in order to maintain contractual margin protection. For resale and repurchase agreements, when necessary, the Company posts additional collateral in order to maintain contractual margin protection.
A substantial portion of the resale and repurchase agreements is recorded at fair value, as described in Notes 20 and 21 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The remaining portion is carried at the amount of cash initially advanced or received, plus accrued interest, as specified in the respective agreements.
A substantial portion of securities borrowing and lending agreements is recorded at the amount of cash advanced or received. The remaining portion is recorded at fair value as the Company elected the fair value option for certain securities borrowed and loaned portfolios, as described in Note 21 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. With respect to securities loaned, the Company receives cash collateral in an amount generally in excess of the market value of the securities loaned. The Company monitors the market value of securities borrowed and securities loaned on a daily basis and obtains or posts additional collateral in order to maintain contractual margin protection.
The following tables present the gross and net resale and repurchase agreements and securities borrowing and lending
agreements and the related offsetting amount permitted under ASC 210-20-45. The tables also include amounts related to financial instruments that are not permitted to be offset under ASC 210-20-45, but would be eligible for offsetting to the extent that an event of default occurred and a legal opinion supporting enforceability of the offsetting rights has been obtained. Remaining exposures continue to be secured by financial collateral, but the Company may not have sought or been able to obtain a legal opinion evidencing enforceability of the offsetting right.
As of September 30, 2018
In millions of dollars
Gross amounts
of recognized
assets
Gross amounts
offset on the
Consolidated
Balance Sheet
(1)
Net amounts of
assets included on
the Consolidated
Balance Sheet
(2)
Amounts
not offset on the
Consolidated Balance
Sheet but eligible for
offsetting upon
counterparty default
(3)
Net
amounts
(4)
Securities purchased under agreements to resell
$
248,802
$
95,913
$
152,889
$
121,141
$
31,748
Deposits paid for securities borrowed
128,032
—
128,032
29,461
98,571
Total
$
376,834
$
95,913
$
280,921
$
150,602
$
130,319
106
In millions of dollars
Gross amounts
of recognized
liabilities
Gross amounts
offset on the
Consolidated
Balance Sheet
(1)
Net amounts of
liabilities included on
the Consolidated
Balance Sheet
(2)
Amounts
not offset on the
Consolidated Balance
Sheet but eligible for
offsetting upon
counterparty default
(3)
Net
amounts
(4)
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
$
257,900
$
95,913
$
161,987
$
87,917
$
74,070
Deposits received for securities loaned
13,811
—
13,811
4,730
9,081
Total
$
271,711
$
95,913
$
175,798
$
92,647
$
83,151
As of December 31, 2017
In millions of dollars
Gross amounts
of recognized
assets
Gross amounts
offset on the
Consolidated
Balance Sheet
(1)
Net amounts of
assets included on
the Consolidated
Balance Sheet
(2)
Amounts
not offset on the
Consolidated Balance
Sheet but eligible for
offsetting upon
counterparty default
(3)
Net
amounts
(4)
Securities purchased under agreements to resell
$
204,460
$
73,476
$
130,984
$
103,022
$
27,962
Deposits paid for securities borrowed
101,494
—
101,494
22,271
79,223
Total
$
305,954
$
73,476
$
232,478
$
125,293
$
107,185
In millions of dollars
Gross amounts
of recognized
liabilities
Gross amounts
offset on the
Consolidated
Balance Sheet
(1)
Net amounts of
liabilities included on
the Consolidated
Balance Sheet
(2)
Amounts
not offset on the
Consolidated Balance
Sheet but eligible for
offsetting upon
counterparty default
(3)
Net
amounts
(4)
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
$
216,122
$
73,476
$
142,646
$
73,716
$
68,930
Deposits received for securities loaned
13,305
—
13,305
4,079
9,226
Total
$
229,427
$
73,476
$
155,951
$
77,795
$
78,156
(1)
Includes financial instruments subject to enforceable master netting agreements that are permitted to be offset under ASC 210-20-45.
(2)
The total of this column for each period excludes federal funds sold/purchased. See tables above.
(3)
Includes financial instruments subject to enforceable master netting agreements that are not permitted to be offset under ASC 210-20-45, but would be eligible for offsetting to the extent that an event of default has occurred and a legal opinion supporting enforceability of the offsetting right has been obtained.
(4)
Remaining exposures continue to be secured by financial collateral, but the Company may not have sought or been able to obtain a legal opinion evidencing enforceability of the offsetting right.
The following tables present the gross amount of liabilities associated with repurchase agreements and securities lending agreements, by remaining contractual maturity:
As of September 30, 2018
In millions of dollars
Open and overnight
Up to 30 days
31–90 days
Greater than 90 days
Total
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
$
121,109
$
59,246
$
30,558
$
46,987
$
257,900
Deposits received for securities loaned
7,091
307
3,200
3,213
13,811
Total
$
128,200
$
59,553
$
33,758
$
50,200
$
271,711
As of December 31, 2017
In millions of dollars
Open and overnight
Up to 30 days
31–90 days
Greater than 90 days
Total
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
$
82,073
$
68,372
$
33,846
$
31,831
$
216,122
Deposits received for securities loaned
9,946
266
1,912
1,181
13,305
Total
$
92,019
$
68,638
$
35,758
$
33,012
$
229,427
107
The following tables present the gross amount of liabilities associated with repurchase agreements and securities lending agreements, by class of underlying collateral:
As of September 30, 2018
In millions of dollars
Repurchase agreements
Securities lending agreements
Total
U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities
$
95,116
$
110
$
95,226
State and municipal securities
2,803
—
2,803
Foreign government securities
94,306
301
94,607
Corporate bonds
22,247
545
22,792
Equity securities
18,759
11,982
30,741
Mortgage-backed securities
15,088
—
15,088
Asset-backed securities
6,513
—
6,513
Other
3,068
873
3,941
Total
$
257,900
$
13,811
$
271,711
As of December 31, 2017
In millions of dollars
Repurchase agreements
Securities lending agreements
Total
U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities
$
58,774
$
—
$
58,774
State and municipal securities
1,605
—
1,605
Foreign government securities
89,576
105
89,681
Corporate bonds
20,194
657
20,851
Equity securities
20,724
11,907
32,631
Mortgage-backed securities
17,791
—
17,791
Asset-backed securities
5,479
—
5,479
Other
1,979
636
2,615
Total
$
216,122
$
13,305
$
229,427
108
11. BROKERAGE RECEIVABLES AND BROKERAGE
PAYABLES
The Company has receivables and payables for financial instruments sold to and purchased from brokers, dealers and customers, which arise in the ordinary course of business.
For additional information on these receivables and payables, see Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Citi’s
2017
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Brokerage receivables
and
Brokerage payables
consisted of the following:
In millions of dollars
September 30,
2018
December 31, 2017
Receivables from customers
$
15,195
$
19,215
Receivables from brokers, dealers and clearing organizations
25,484
19,169
Total brokerage receivables
(1)
$
40,679
$
38,384
Payables to customers
$
41,414
$
38,741
Payables to brokers, dealers and clearing organizations
31,932
22,601
Total brokerage payables
(1)
$
73,346
$
61,342
(1)
Includes brokerage receivables and payables recorded by Citi broker-dealer entities that are accounted for in accordance with the AICPA Accounting Guide for Brokers and Dealers in Securities as codified in ASC 940-320.
109
12. INVESTMENTS
For additional information regarding Citi’s investment portfolios, including evaluating investments for other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI), see Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Citi’s
2017
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Overview
Citi adopted ASU 2016-01 and ASU 2018-03 as of January 1, 2018. The ASUs require fair value changes on marketable equity securities to be recognized in earnings. The available-for-sale category was eliminated for equity securities. Also, non-marketable equity securities are required to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in earnings unless (i) the measurement alternative is elected or (ii) the investment represents Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank stock or certain exchange seats that continue to be carried at cost. See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details.
The following tables present Citi’s investments by category:
In millions of dollars
September 30,
2018
Debt securities available-for-sale (AFS)
$
284,782
Debt securities held-to-maturity (HTM)
(1)
53,249
Marketable equity securities carried at fair value
(2)
260
Non-marketable equity securities carried at fair value
(2)
1,128
Non-marketable equity securities measured using the measurement alternative
(3)
452
Non-marketable equity securities carried at cost
(4)
5,642
Total investments
$
345,513
In millions of dollars
December 31,
2017
Securities available-for-sale (AFS)
$
290,914
Debt securities held-to-maturity (HTM)
(1)
53,320
Non-marketable equity securities carried at fair value
(2)
1,206
Non-marketable equity securities carried at cost
(4)
6,850
Total investments
$
352,290
(1)
Carried at adjusted amortized cost basis, net of any credit-related impairment.
(2)
Unrealized gains and losses are recognized in earnings.
(3)
Impairment losses and adjustments to the carrying value as a result of observable price changes are recognized in earnings.
(4)
Represents shares issued by the Federal Reserve Bank, Federal Home Loan Banks and certain exchanges of which Citigroup is a member.
The following table presents interest and dividend income on investments:
Three Months Ended September 30,
Nine Months Ended September 30,
In millions of dollars
2018
2017
2018
2017
Taxable interest
$
2,195
$
1,922
$
6,395
$
5,545
Interest exempt from U.S. federal income tax
130
129
392
412
Dividend income
63
53
209
165
Total interest and dividend income
$
2,388
$
2,104
$
6,996
$
6,122
110
The following table presents realized gains and losses on the sales of investments, which excludes OTTI losses:
Three Months Ended September 30,
Nine Months Ended September 30,
In millions of dollars
2018
2017
2018
2017
Gross realized investment gains
$
153
$
293
$
550
$
840
Gross realized investment losses
(84
)
(80
)
(209
)
(214
)
Net realized gains on sale of investments
$
69
$
213
$
341
$
626
Securities Available-for-Sale
The amortized cost and fair value of AFS securities were as follows:
September 30, 2018
December 31, 2017
In millions of dollars
Amortized
cost
Gross
unrealized
gains
Gross
unrealized
losses
Fair
value
Amortized
cost
Gross
unrealized
gains
Gross
unrealized
losses
Fair
value
Securities AFS
Mortgage-backed securities
(1)
U.S. government-sponsored agency guaranteed
$
46,675
$
61
$
1,575
$
45,161
$
42,116
$
125
$
500
$
41,741
Prime
—
—
—
—
11
6
—
17
Alt-A
1
—
—
1
26
90
—
116
Non-U.S. residential
1,620
7
1
1,626
2,744
13
6
2,751
Commercial
233
1
3
231
334
—
2
332
Total mortgage-backed securities
$
48,529
$
69
$
1,579
$
47,019
$
45,231
$
234
$
508
$
44,957
U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities
U.S. Treasury
$
108,509
$
28
$
1,949
$
106,588
$
108,344
$
77
$
971
$
107,450
Agency obligations
9,752
—
197
9,555
10,813
7
124
10,696
Total U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities
$
118,261
$
28
$
2,146
$
116,143
$
119,157
$
84
$
1,095
$
118,146
State and municipal
(2)
$
9,662
$
87
$
269
$
9,480
$
8,870
$
140
$
245
$
8,765
Foreign government
94,937
293
769
94,461
100,615
508
590
100,533
Corporate
12,498
21
139
12,380
14,144
51
86
14,109
Asset-backed securities
(1)
1,265
3
6
1,262
3,906
14
2
3,918
Other debt securities
4,036
1
—
4,037
297
—
—
297
Total debt securities AFS
$
289,188
$
502
$
4,908
$
284,782
$
292,220
$
1,031
$
2,526
$
290,725
Marketable equity securities AFS
(3)
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
186
$
4
$
1
$
189
Total securities AFS
$
289,188
$
502
$
4,908
$
284,782
$
292,406
$
1,035
$
2,527
$
290,914
(1)
The Company invests in mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities. These securitizations are generally considered VIEs. The Company’s maximum exposure to loss from these VIEs is equal to the carrying amount of the securities, which is reflected in the table above. For mortgage-backed and asset-backed securitizations in which the Company has other involvement, see Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(2)
In the second quarter of 2017, Citi early adopted ASU 2017-08,
Receivables—Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Subtopic 310-20): Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities.
Upon adoption, a cumulative effect adjustment was recorded to reduce
Retained earnings
, effective January 1, 2017, for the incremental amortization of purchase premiums and cumulative fair value hedge adjustments on callable state and municipal debt securities. For additional information, see Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(3)
Citi adopted ASU 2016-01 and ASU 2018-03 as of January 1, 2018, resulting in a cumulative effect adjustment from AOCI to
Retained earnings
for net unrealized gains on marketable equity securities AFS. The available-for-sale category was eliminated for equity securities effective January 1, 2018. See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details.
111
The following table shows the fair value of AFS securities that have been in an unrealized loss position:
Less than 12 months
12 months or longer
Total
In millions of dollars
Fair
value
Gross
unrealized
losses
Fair
value
Gross
unrealized
losses
Fair
value
Gross
unrealized
losses
September 30, 2018
Debt Securities AFS
(1)
Mortgage-backed securities
U.S. government-sponsored agency guaranteed
$
21,723
$
574
$
18,828
$
1,001
$
40,551
$
1,575
Non-U.S. residential
256
1
1
—
257
1
Commercial
168
2
51
1
219
3
Total mortgage-backed securities
$
22,147
$
577
$
18,880
$
1,002
$
41,027
$
1,579
U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities
U.S. Treasury
$
27,095
$
279
$
65,789
$
1,670
$
92,884
$
1,949
Agency obligations
1,549
15
8,004
182
9,553
197
Total U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities
$
28,644
$
294
$
73,793
$
1,852
$
102,437
$
2,146
State and municipal
$
1,811
$
48
$
1,260
$
221
$
3,071
$
269
Foreign government
48,491
463
11,598
306
60,089
769
Corporate
6,556
114
798
25
7,354
139
Asset-backed securities
604
6
27
—
631
6
Other debt securities
1,313
—
—
—
1,313
—
Total debt securities AFS
$
109,566
$
1,502
$
106,356
$
3,406
$
215,922
$
4,908
December 31, 2017
Securities AFS
Mortgage-backed securities
U.S. government-sponsored agency guaranteed
$
30,994
$
438
$
2,206
$
62
$
33,200
$
500
Non-U.S. residential
753
6
—
—
753
6
Commercial
150
1
57
1
207
2
Total mortgage-backed securities
$
31,897
$
445
$
2,263
$
63
$
34,160
$
508
U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities
U.S. Treasury
$
79,050
$
856
$
7,404
$
115
$
86,454
$
971
Agency obligations
8,857
110
1,163
14
10,020
124
Total U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities
$
87,907
$
966
$
8,567
$
129
$
96,474
$
1,095
State and municipal
$
1,009
$
11
$
1,155
$
234
$
2,164
$
245
Foreign government
53,206
356
9,051
234
62,257
590
Corporate
6,737
74
859
12
7,596
86
Asset-backed securities
449
1
25
1
474
2
Other debt securities
—
—
—
—
—
—
Marketable equity securities AFS
(1)
11
1
—
—
11
1
Total securities AFS
$
181,216
$
1,854
$
21,920
$
673
$
203,136
$
2,527
(1)
Citi adopted ASU 2016-01 and ASU 2018-03 as of January 1, 2018, resulting in a cumulative effect adjustment from AOCI to retained earnings for net unrealized gains on marketable equity securities AFS. The available-for-sale category was eliminated for equity securities effective January 1, 2018. See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details.
112
The following table presents the amortized cost and fair value of AFS debt securities by contractual maturity dates:
September 30, 2018
December 31, 2017
In millions of dollars
Amortized
cost
Fair
value
Amortized
cost
Fair
value
Mortgage-backed securities
(1)
Due within 1 year
$
434
$
431
$
45
$
45
After 1 but within 5 years
1,201
1,194
1,306
1,304
After 5 but within 10 years
2,159
2,119
1,376
1,369
After 10 years
(2)
44,735
43,275
42,504
42,239
Total
$
48,529
$
47,019
$
45,231
$
44,957
U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities
Due within 1 year
$
34,543
$
34,471
$
4,913
$
4,907
After 1 but within 5 years
81,735
79,739
111,236
110,238
After 5 but within 10 years
1,893
1,842
3,008
3,001
After 10 years
(2)
90
91
—
—
Total
$
118,261
$
116,143
$
119,157
$
118,146
State and municipal
Due within 1 year
$
2,773
$
2,772
$
1,792
$
1,792
After 1 but within 5 years
1,575
1,570
2,579
2,576
After 5 but within 10 years
572
590
514
528
After 10 years
(2)
4,742
4,548
3,985
3,869
Total
$
9,662
$
9,480
$
8,870
$
8,765
Foreign government
Due within 1 year
$
34,686
$
34,649
$
32,130
$
32,100
After 1 but within 5 years
47,933
47,416
53,034
53,165
After 5 but within 10 years
10,371
10,386
12,949
12,680
After 10 years
(2)
1,947
2,010
2,502
2,588
Total
$
94,937
$
94,461
$
100,615
$
100,533
All other
(3)
Due within 1 year
$
6,439
$
6,435
$
3,998
$
3,991
After 1 but within 5 years
9,151
9,068
9,047
9,027
After 5 but within 10 years
1,614
1,603
3,415
3,431
After 10 years
(2)
595
573
1,887
1,875
Total
$
17,799
$
17,679
$
18,347
$
18,324
Total debt securities AFS
$
289,188
$
284,782
$
292,220
$
290,725
(1)
Includes mortgage-backed securities of U.S. government-sponsored agencies.
(2)
Investments with no stated maturities are included as contractual maturities of greater than 10 years. Actual maturities may differ due to call or prepayment rights.
(3)
Includes corporate, asset-backed and other debt securities.
113
Debt Securities Held-to-Maturity
The carrying value and fair value of debt securities HTM were as follows:
In millions of dollars
Carrying
value
Gross
unrealized
gains
Gross
unrealized
losses
Fair
value
September 30, 2018
Debt securities held-to-maturity
Mortgage-backed securities
(1)
U.S. government agency guaranteed
$
25,058
$
3
$
869
$
24,192
Alt-A
—
—
—
—
Non-U.S. residential
1,288
19
—
1,307
Commercial
260
—
—
260
Total mortgage-backed securities
$
26,606
$
22
$
869
$
25,759
State and municipal
$
7,399
$
124
$
185
$
7,338
Foreign government
1,151
—
14
1,137
Asset-backed securities
(1)
18,093
27
11
18,109
Total debt securities held-to-maturity
$
53,249
$
173
$
1,079
$
52,343
December 31, 2017
Debt securities held-to-maturity
Mortgage-backed securities
(1)
U.S. government agency guaranteed
$
23,880
$
40
$
157
$
23,763
Alt-A
141
57
—
198
Non-U.S. residential
1,841
65
—
1,906
Commercial
237
—
—
237
Total mortgage-backed securities
$
26,099
$
162
$
157
$
26,104
State and municipal
(2)
$
8,897
$
378
$
73
$
9,202
Foreign government
740
—
18
722
Asset-backed securities
(1)
17,584
162
22
17,724
Total debt securities held-to-maturity
$
53,320
$
702
$
270
$
53,752
(1)
The Company invests in mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities. These securitizations are generally considered VIEs. The Company’s maximum exposure to loss from these VIEs is equal to the carrying amount of the securities, which is reflected in the table above. For mortgage-backed and asset-backed securitizations in which the Company has other involvement, see Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(2)
In the second quarter of 2017, Citi early adopted ASU 2017-08,
Receivables—Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Subtopic 310-20): Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities.
Upon adoption, a cumulative effect adjustment was recorded to reduce retained earnings, effective January 1, 2017, for the incremental amortization of purchase premiums and cumulative fair value hedge adjustments on callable state and municipal debt securities. For additional information, see Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
114
The table below shows the fair value of debt securities HTM that have been in an unrecognized loss position:
Less than 12 months
12 months or longer
Total
In millions of dollars
Fair
value
Gross
unrecognized
losses
Fair
value
Gross
unrecognized
losses
Fair
value
Gross
unrecognized
losses
September 30, 2018
Debt securities held-to-maturity
Mortgage-backed securities
$
13,815
$
392
$
9,815
$
477
$
23,630
$
869
State and municipal
2,283
58
799
127
3,082
185
Foreign government
1,138
14
—
—
1,138
14
Asset-backed securities
3,670
11
2
—
3,672
11
Total debt securities held-to-maturity
$
20,906
$
475
$
10,616
$
604
$
31,522
$
1,079
December 31, 2017
Debt securities held-to-maturity
Mortgage-backed securities
$
8,569
$
50
$
6,353
$
107
$
14,922
$
157
State and municipal
353
5
835
68
1,188
73
Foreign government
723
18
—
—
723
18
Asset-backed securities
71
3
134
19
205
22
Total debt securities held-to-maturity
$
9,716
$
76
$
7,322
$
194
$
17,038
$
270
Note: Excluded from the gross unrecognized losses presented in the table above are
$(65) million
and
$(117) million
of net unrealized losses recorded in AOCI as of
September 30, 2018
and
December 31, 2017
, respectively, primarily related to the difference between the amortized cost and carrying value of HTM debt securities that were reclassified from AFS. Substantially all of these net unrecognized losses relate to securities that have been in a loss position for 12 months or longer at
September 30, 2018
and
December 31, 2017
.
115
The following table presents the carrying value and fair value of HTM debt securities by contractual maturity dates:
September 30, 2018
December 31, 2017
In millions of dollars
Carrying value
Fair value
Carrying value
Fair value
Mortgage-backed securities
Due within 1 year
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
After 1 but within 5 years
129
127
720
720
After 5 but within 10 years
101
99
148
149
After 10 years
(1)
26,376
25,533
25,231
25,235
Total
$
26,606
$
25,759
$
26,099
$
26,104
State and municipal
Due within 1 year
$
31
$
31
$
407
$
425
After 1 but within 5 years
131
133
259
270
After 5 but within 10 years
492
495
512
524
After 10 years
(1)
6,745
6,679
7,719
7,983
Total
$
7,399
$
7,338
$
8,897
$
9,202
Foreign government
Due within 1 year
$
114
$
114
$
381
$
381
After 1 but within 5 years
1,037
1,023
359
341
After 5 but within 10 years
—
—
—
—
After 10 years
(1)
—
—
—
—
Total
$
1,151
$
1,137
$
740
$
722
All other
(2)
Due within 1 year
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
After 1 but within 5 years
—
—
—
—
After 5 but within 10 years
2,244
2,250
1,669
1,680
After 10 years
(1)
15,849
15,859
15,915
16,044
Total
$
18,093
$
18,109
$
17,584
$
17,724
Total debt securities held-to-maturity
$
53,249
$
52,343
$
53,320
$
53,752
(1)
Investments with no stated maturities are included as contractual maturities of greater than 10 years. Actual maturities may differ due to call or prepayment rights.
(2)
Includes corporate and asset-backed securities.
116
Evaluating Investments for Other-Than-Temporary Impairment
Overview
The Company conducts periodic reviews of all securities with unrealized losses to evaluate whether the impairment is other-than-temporary. This review applies to all securities that are not measured at fair value through earnings. Effective January 1, 2018, the AFS category was eliminated for equity securities and, therefore, other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) review is not required for those securities. See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details.
An unrealized loss exists when the current fair value of an individual security is less than its amortized cost basis. Unrealized losses that are determined to be temporary in nature are recorded, net of tax, in AOCI for AFS securities. Temporary losses related to HTM debt securities generally are not recorded, as these investments are carried at adjusted amortized cost basis. However, for HTM debt securities with credit-related impairment, the credit loss is recognized in earnings as OTTI, and any difference between the cost basis adjusted for the OTTI and fair value is recognized in AOCI and amortized as an adjustment of yield over the remaining contractual life of the security. For debt securities transferred to HTM from
Trading account assets
, amortized cost is defined as the fair value of the securities at the date of transfer, plus any accretion income and less any impairment recognized in earnings subsequent to transfer. For debt securities transferred to HTM from AFS, amortized cost is defined as the original purchase cost, adjusted for the cumulative accretion or amortization of any purchase discount or premium, plus or minus any cumulative fair value hedge adjustments, net of accretion or amortization, and less any impairment recognized in earnings.
Regardless of the classification of securities as AFS or HTM, the Company assesses each position with an unrealized loss for OTTI. Factors considered in determining whether a loss is temporary include:
•
the length of time and the extent to which fair value has been below cost;
•
the severity of the impairment;
•
the cause of the impairment and the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer;
•
activity in the market of the issuer that may indicate adverse credit conditions; and
•
the Company’s ability and intent to hold the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery.
The Company’s review for impairment generally entails:
•
identification and evaluation of impaired investments;
•
analysis of individual investments that have fair values less than amortized cost, including consideration of the length of time the investment has been in an unrealized loss position and the expected recovery period;
•
consideration of evidential matter, including an evaluation of factors or triggers that could cause individual investments to qualify as having other-than-temporary
impairment and those that would not support other-than-temporary impairment; and
•
documentation of the results of these analyses, as required under business policies.
Debt Securities
The entire difference between amortized cost basis and fair value is recognized in earnings as OTTI for impaired debt securities that the Company has an intent to sell or for which the Company believes it will more-likely-than-not be required to sell prior to recovery of the amortized cost basis. However, for those securities that the Company does not intend to sell and is not likely to be required to sell, only the credit-related impairment is recognized in earnings and any non-credit-related impairment is recorded in AOCI.
For debt securities, credit impairment exists where management does not expect to receive contractual principal and interest cash flows sufficient to recover the entire amortized cost basis of a security.
AFS Equity Securities and Equity Method Investments
For AFS equity securities, prior to January 1, 2018, management considered the various factors described above, including its intent and ability to hold an equity security for a period of time sufficient for recovery to cost or whether it was more-likely-than-not that the Company would have been required to sell the security prior to recovery of its cost basis. Where management lacked that intent or ability, the security’s decline in fair value was deemed to be other-than-temporary and was recorded in earnings. Effective January 1, 2018, the AFS category has been eliminated for equity securities and, therefore, OTTI review is not required for those securities. See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details.
Management assesses equity method investments that have fair values that are less than their respective carrying values for OTTI. Fair value is measured as price multiplied by quantity if the investee has publicly listed securities. If the investee is not publicly listed, other methods are used (see Note 20 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).
For impaired equity method investments that Citi plans to sell prior to recovery of value or would likely be required to sell, with no expectation that the fair value will recover prior to the expected sale date, the full impairment is recognized in earnings as OTTI regardless of severity and duration. The measurement of the OTTI does not include partial projected recoveries subsequent to the balance sheet date.
For impaired equity method investments that management does not plan to sell and is not likely to be required to sell prior to recovery of value, the evaluation of whether an impairment is other-than-temporary is based on (i) whether and when an equity method investment will recover in value and (ii) whether the investor has the intent and ability to hold that investment for a period of time sufficient to recover the value. The determination of whether the impairment is considered other-than-temporary considers the following indicators:
•
the cause of the impairment and the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, including any
117
specific events that may influence the operations of the issuer;
•
the intent and ability to hold the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in market value; and
•
the length of time and extent to which fair value has been less than the carrying value.
The sections below describe the Company’s process for identifying credit-related impairments for security types that have the most significant unrealized losses as of September 30, 2018.
Mortgage-Backed Securities
For U.S. mortgage-backed securities, credit impairment is assessed using a cash flow model that estimates the principal and interest cash flows on the underlying mortgages using the security-specific collateral and transaction structure. The model distributes the estimated cash flows to the various tranches of securities, considering the transaction structure and any subordination and credit enhancements that exist in that structure. The cash flow model incorporates actual cash flows on the mortgage-backed securities through the current period and then estimates the remaining cash flows using a number of assumptions, including default rates, prepayment rates, recovery rates (on foreclosed properties) and loss severity rates (on non-agency mortgage-backed securities).
Management develops specific assumptions using market data, internal estimates and estimates published by rating agencies and other third-party sources. Default rates are projected by considering current underlying mortgage loan performance, generally assuming the default of (i) 10% of current loans, (ii) 25% of 30–59 day delinquent loans,
(iii) 70% of 60–90 day delinquent loans and (iv) 100% of 91+ day delinquent loans. These estimates are extrapolated along a default timing curve to estimate the total lifetime pool default rate. Other assumptions contemplate the actual collateral attributes, including geographic concentrations, rating actions and current market prices.
Cash flow projections are developed using different stress test scenarios. Management evaluates the results of those stress tests (including the severity of any cash shortfall indicated and the likelihood of the stress scenarios actually occurring based on the underlying pool’s characteristics and performance) to assess whether management expects to recover the amortized cost basis of the security. If cash flow projections indicate that the Company does not expect to recover its amortized cost basis, the Company recognizes the estimated credit loss in earnings.
State and Municipal Securities
The process for identifying credit impairments in Citigroup’s AFS and HTM state and municipal bonds is primarily based on a credit analysis that incorporates third-party credit ratings. Citigroup monitors the bond issuers and any insurers providing default protection in the form of financial guarantee insurance. The average external credit rating, ignoring any insurance, is Aa3/AA-. In the event of an external rating downgrade or other indicator of credit impairment (i.e., based on instrument-specific estimates of cash flows or probability of issuer default), the subject bond is specifically reviewed for adverse changes in the amount or timing of expected contractual principal and interest payments.
For state and municipal bonds with unrealized losses that Citigroup plans to sell, or would be more-likely-than-not required to sell, the full impairment is recognized in earnings.
Recognition and Measurement of OTTI
The following tables present total OTTI recognized in earnings:
OTTI on Investments
Three Months Ended
September 30, 2018
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2018
In millions of dollars
AFS
(1)
HTM
Total
AFS
(1)
HTM
Total
Impairment losses related to debt securities that the Company does not intend to sell nor will likely be required to sell:
Total OTTI losses recognized during the period
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
Less: portion of impairment loss recognized in AOCI (before taxes)
—
—
—
—
—
—
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings for debt securities that the Company does not intend to sell nor will likely be required to sell
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
Impairment losses recognized in earnings for debt securities that the Company intends to sell, would be more-likely-than-not required to sell or will be subject to an issuer call deemed probable of exercise
70
—
70
109
—
109
Total OTTI losses recognized in earnings
$
70
$
—
$
70
$
109
$
—
$
109
(1)
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018, amounts represent AFS debt securities. Effective January 1, 2018, the AFS category was eliminated for equity securities. See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details.
118
OTTI on Investments
Three Months Ended
September 30, 2017
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2017
In millions of dollars
AFS
(1)
HTM
Total
AFS
(1)
HTM
Total
Impairment losses related to securities that the Company does not intend to sell nor will likely be required to sell:
Total OTTI losses recognized during the period
$
2
$
—
$
2
$
2
$
—
$
2
Less: portion of impairment loss recognized in AOCI (before taxes)
—
—
—
—
—
—
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings for securities that the Company does not intend to sell nor will likely be required to sell
$
2
$
—
$
2
$
2
$
—
$
2
Impairment losses recognized in earnings for securities that the Company intends to sell, would be more-likely-than-not required to sell or will be subject to an issuer call deemed probable of exercise and FX losses
12
1
13
43
2
45
Total impairment losses recognized in earnings
$
14
$
1
$
15
$
45
$
2
$
47
(1)
Includes OTTI on non-marketable equity securities.
The following are three-month rollforwards of the credit-related impairments recognized in earnings for AFS and HTM debt securities held that the Company does not intend to sell nor likely will be required to sell:
Cumulative OTTI credit losses recognized in earnings on debt securities still held
In millions of dollars
June 30, 2018 balance
Credit
impairments
recognized in
earnings on
securities not
previously
impaired
Credit
impairments
recognized in
earnings on
securities that
have
been previously
impaired
Changes due to
credit-impaired
securities sold,
transferred or
matured
September 30, 2018 balance
AFS debt securities
Mortgage-backed securities
(1)
$
1
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
1
State and municipal
—
—
—
—
—
Foreign government securities
—
—
—
—
—
Corporate
4
—
—
—
4
All other debt securities
2
—
—
—
2
Total OTTI credit losses recognized for AFS debt securities
$
7
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
7
HTM debt securities
Mortgage-backed securities
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
State and municipal
—
—
—
—
—
Total OTTI credit losses recognized for HTM debt securities
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
(1)
Primarily consists of Prime securities.
119
Cumulative OTTI credit losses recognized in earnings on debt securities still held
In millions of dollars
June 30, 2017 balance
Credit
impairments
recognized in
earnings on
securities not
previously
impaired
Credit
impairments
recognized in
earnings on
securities that
have
been previously
impaired
Reductions due to
credit-impaired
securities sold,
transferred or
matured
September 30, 2017 balance
AFS debt securities
Mortgage-backed securities
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
State and municipal
4
—
—
—
4
Foreign government securities
—
—
—
—
—
Corporate
4
—
—
—
4
All other debt securities
—
—
2
—
2
Total OTTI credit losses recognized for AFS debt securities
$
8
$
—
$
2
$
—
$
10
HTM debt securities
Mortgage-backed securities
(1)
$
97
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
97
State and municipal
3
—
—
—
3
Total OTTI credit losses recognized for HTM debt securities
$
100
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
100
(1)
Primarily consists of Alt-A securities.
The following are nine-month rollforwards of the credit-related impairments recognized in earnings for AFS and HTM debt securities held that the Company does not intend to sell nor likely will be required to sell:
Cumulative OTTI credit losses recognized in earnings on debt securities still held
In millions of dollars
December 31, 2017 balance
Credit
impairments
recognized in
earnings on
securities not
previously
impaired
Credit
impairments
recognized in
earnings on
securities that
have
been previously
impaired
Changes due to
credit-impaired
securities sold,
transferred or
matured
(1)
September 30, 2018 balance
AFS debt securities
Mortgage-backed securities
(2)
$
38
$
—
$
—
$
(37
)
$
1
State and municipal
4
—
—
(4
)
—
Foreign government securities
—
—
—
—
—
Corporate
4
—
—
—
4
All other debt securities
2
—
—
—
2
Total OTTI credit losses recognized for AFS debt securities
$
48
$
—
$
—
$
(41
)
$
7
HTM debt securities
Mortgage-backed securities
(3)
$
54
$
—
$
—
$
(54
)
$
—
State and municipal
3
—
—
(3
)
—
Total OTTI credit losses recognized for HTM debt securities
$
57
$
—
$
—
$
(57
)
$
—
(1)
Includes
$18 million
in cumulative OTTI reclassified from HTM to AFS due to the transfer of the related debt securities from HTM to AFS. Citi adopted ASU 2017-12,
Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedge Activities
, on January 1, 2018 and transferred approximately
$4 billion
of HTM debt securities into AFS classification as permitted as a one-time transfer under the standard.
(2)
Primarily consists of Prime securities.
(3)
Primarily consists of Alt-A securities.
120
Cumulative OTTI credit losses recognized in earnings on debt securities still held
In millions of dollars
December 31, 2016 balance
Credit
impairments
recognized in
earnings on
securities not
previously
impaired
Credit
impairments
recognized in
earnings on
securities that
have
been previously
impaired
Reductions due to
credit-impaired
securities sold,
transferred or
matured
September 30, 2017 balance
AFS debt securities
Mortgage-backed securities
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
State and municipal
4
—
—
—
4
Foreign government securities
—
—
—
—
—
Corporate
5
—
—
(1
)
4
All other debt securities
22
—
2
(22
)
2
Total OTTI credit losses recognized for AFS debt securities
$
31
$
—
$
2
$
(23
)
$
10
HTM debt securities
Mortgage-backed securities
(1)
$
101
$
—
$
—
$
(4
)
$
97
State and municipal
3
—
—
—
3
Total OTTI credit losses recognized for HTM debt securities
$
104
$
—
$
—
$
(4
)
$
100
(1)
Primarily consists of Alt-A securities.
Non-Marketable Equity Securities Not Carried at Fair Value
Effective January 1, 2018, non-marketable equity securities are required to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in earnings unless (i) the measurement alternative is elected or (ii) the investment represents Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank stock or certain exchange seats that continue to be carried at cost. See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details.
The election to measure a non-marketable equity security using the measurement alternative is made on an instrument-by-instrument basis. Under the measurement alternative, an equity security is carried at cost plus or minus changes resulting from observable prices in orderly transactions for the identical or a similar investment of the same issuer. The carrying value of the equity security is adjusted to fair value on the date of an observed transaction. Fair value may differ from the observed transaction price due to a number of factors, including marketability adjustments and differences in rights and obligations when the observed transaction is not for the identical investment held by Citi.
Equity securities under the measurement alternative are also assessed for impairment. On a quarterly basis, management qualitatively assesses whether each equity security under the measurement alternative is impaired. Impairment indicators that are considered include, but are not limited to, the following:
•
a significant deterioration in the earnings performance, credit rating, asset quality or business prospects of the investee;
•
a significant adverse change in the regulatory, economic or technological environment of the investee;
•
a significant adverse change in the general market condition of either the geographical area or the industry in which the investee operates;
•
a bona fide offer to purchase, an offer by the investee to sell or a completed auction process for the same or similar investment for an amount less than the carrying amount of that investment; and
•
factors that raise significant concerns about the investee’s ability to continue as a going concern, such as negative cash flows from operations, working capital deficiencies or noncompliance with statutory capital requirements or debt covenants.
When the qualitative assessment indicates that impairment exists, the investment is written down to fair value, with the full difference between the fair value of the investment and its carrying amount recognized in earnings.
121
Below is the carrying value of non-marketable equity securities measured using the measurement alternative at September 30, 2018, and amounts recognized in earnings for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018:
In millions of dollars
Three Months Ended
September 30, 2018
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2018
Measurement alternative:
Balance as of September 30, 2018
$
452
$
452
Impairment losses
(1)
—
4
Downward changes for observable prices
(1)
14
18
Upward changes for observable prices
(1)
21
133
(1)
See Note 20 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on these nonrecurring fair value measurements.
A similar impairment analysis is performed for non-marketable equity securities carried at cost. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018, there was
no
impairment loss recognized in earnings for non-marketable equity securities carried at cost.
Investments in Alternative Investment Funds That Calculate Net Asset Value
The Company holds investments in certain alternative investment funds that calculate net asset value (NAV), or its equivalent, including hedge funds, private equity funds, funds
of funds and real estate funds, as provided by third-party asset managers. Investments in such funds are generally classified as non-marketable equity securities carried at fair value. The fair values of these investments are estimated using the NAV of the Company’s ownership interest in the funds. Some of
these investments are in “covered funds” for purposes of the Volcker Rule, which prohibits certain proprietary investment activities and limits the ownership of, and relationships with, covered funds. On April 21, 2017, Citi’s request for extension of the permitted holding period under the Volcker Rule for certain of its investments in illiquid funds was approved, allowing the Company to hold such investments until the earlier of 5 years from the July 21, 2017 expiration date of the general conformance period, or the date such investments mature or are otherwise conformed with the Volcker Rule.
Fair value
Unfunded
commitments
Redemption frequency
(if currently eligible)
monthly, quarterly, annually
Redemption
notice
period
In millions of dollars
September 30,
2018
December 31, 2017
September 30,
2018
December 31, 2017
Hedge funds
$
—
$
1
$
—
$
—
Generally quarterly
10–95 days
Private equity funds
(1)(2)
186
372
62
62
—
—
Real estate funds
(2)(3)
14
31
19
20
—
—
Mutual/collective investment funds
25
—
—
—
—
—
Total
$
225
$
404
$
81
$
82
—
—
(1)
Private equity funds include funds that invest in infrastructure, emerging markets and venture capital.
(2)
With respect to the Company’s investments in private equity funds and real estate funds, distributions from each fund will be received as the underlying assets held by these funds are liquidated. It is estimated that the underlying assets of these funds will be liquidated over a period of several years as market conditions allow. Private equity and real estate funds do not allow redemption of investments by their investors. Investors are permitted to sell or transfer their investments, subject to the approval of the general partner or investment manager of these funds, which generally may not be unreasonably withheld.
(3)
Includes several real estate funds that invest primarily in commercial real estate in the U.S., Europe and Asia.
122
13. LOANS
Citigroup loans are reported in
two
categories: consumer and corporate. These categories are classified primarily according to the segment and subsegment that manage the loans. For additional information regarding Citi’s consumer and corporate loans, including related accounting policies, see Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Citi’s
2017
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Consumer Loans
Consumer loans represent loans and leases managed primarily by
GCB
and
Corporate/Other
. The following table provides Citi’s consumer loans by loan type:
In millions of dollars
September 30,
2018
December 31, 2017
In U.S. offices
Mortgage and real estate
(1)
$
61,048
$
65,467
Installment, revolving credit and other
3,515
3,398
Cards
137,051
139,006
Commercial and industrial
7,686
7,840
$
209,300
$
215,711
In offices outside the U.S.
Mortgage and real estate
(1)
$
43,714
$
44,081
Installment, revolving credit and other
27,899
26,556
Cards
24,971
26,257
Commercial and industrial
18,821
20,238
Lease financing
52
76
$
115,457
$
117,208
Total consumer loans
$
324,757
$
332,919
Net unearned income
$
712
$
737
Consumer loans, net of unearned income
$
325,469
$
333,656
(1)
Loans secured primarily by real estate.
The Company sold and/or reclassified to held-for-sale
$0.3 billion
and
$3.0 billion
,
$0.4 billion
and
$3.2 billion
of consumer loans during the
three and nine months
ended
September 30, 2018
and 2017, respectively.
123
Consumer Loan Delinquency and Non-Accrual Details at
September 30, 2018
In millions of dollars
Total
current
(1)(2)
30–89 days
past due
(3)
≥ 90 days
past due
(3)
Past due
government
guaranteed
(4)
Total
loans
(2)
Total
non-accrual
90 days past due
and accruing
In North America offices
Residential first mortgages
(5)
$
46,038
$
503
$
263
$
903
$
47,707
$
628
$
641
Home equity loans
(6)(7)
11,693
174
264
—
12,131
561
—
Credit cards
134,721
1,612
1,539
—
137,872
—
1,539
Installment and other
3,473
40
14
—
3,527
20
—
Commercial banking loans
9,206
25
48
—
9,279
114
—
Total
$
205,131
$
2,354
$
2,128
$
903
$
210,516
$
1,323
$
2,180
In offices outside North America
Residential first mortgages
(5)
$
35,919
$
217
$
146
$
—
$
36,282
$
397
$
—
Credit cards
23,638
420
356
—
24,414
314
223
Installment and other
25,192
267
108
—
25,567
163
—
Commercial banking loans
28,569
54
66
—
28,689
177
—
Total
$
113,318
$
958
$
676
$
—
$
114,952
$
1,051
$
223
Total
GCB
and
Corporate/Other
—
Consumer
$
318,449
$
3,312
$
2,804
$
903
$
325,468
$
2,374
$
2,403
Other
(8)
1
—
—
—
1
—
—
Total Citigroup
$
318,450
$
3,312
$
2,804
$
903
$
325,469
$
2,374
$
2,403
(1)
Loans less than
30
days past due are presented as current.
(2)
Includes
$21 million
of residential first mortgages recorded at fair value.
(3)
Excludes loans guaranteed by U.S. government-sponsored entities.
(4)
Consists of residential first mortgages that are guaranteed by U.S. government-sponsored entities that are 30–89 days past due of
$0.2 billion
and
90
days or more past due of
$0.7 billion
.
(5)
Includes approximately
$0.1 billion
of residential first mortgage loans in process of foreclosure.
(6)
Includes approximately
$0.1 billion
of home equity loans in process of foreclosure.
(7)
Fixed-rate home equity loans and loans extended under home equity lines of credit, which are typically in junior lien positions.
(8)
Represents loans classified as consumer loans on the Consolidated Balance Sheet that are not included in
GCB
or
Corporate/Other
consumer credit metrics.
124
Consumer Loan Delinquency and Non-Accrual Details at
December 31, 2017
In millions of dollars
Total
current
(1)(2)
30–89 days
past due
(3)
≥ 90 days
past due
(3)
Past due
government
guaranteed
(4)
Total
loans
(2)
Total
non-accrual
90 days past due
and accruing
In North America offices
Residential first mortgages
(5)
$
47,366
$
505
$
280
$
1,225
$
49,376
$
665
$
941
Home equity loans
(6)(7)
14,268
207
352
—
14,827
750
—
Credit cards
136,588
1,528
1,613
—
139,729
—
1,596
Installment and other
3,395
45
16
—
3,456
22
1
Commercial banking loans
9,395
51
65
—
9,511
213
—
Total
$
211,012
$
2,336
$
2,326
$
1,225
$
216,899
$
1,650
$
2,538
In offices outside North America
Residential first mortgages
(5)
$
37,062
$
209
$
148
$
—
$
37,419
$
400
$
—
Credit cards
24,934
427
366
—
25,727
323
259
Installment and other
25,634
275
123
—
26,032
157
—
Commercial banking loans
27,449
57
72
—
27,578
160
—
Total
$
115,079
$
968
$
709
$
—
$
116,756
$
1,040
$
259
Total
GCB
and
Corporate/Other
—
Consumer
$
326,091
$
3,304
$
3,035
$
1,225
$
333,655
$
2,690
$
2,797
Other
(8)
1
—
—
—
1
—
—
Total Citigroup
$
326,092
$
3,304
$
3,035
$
1,225
$
333,656
$
2,690
$
2,797
(1)
Loans less than
30
days past due are presented as current.
(2)
Includes
$25 million
of residential first mortgages recorded at fair value.
(3)
Excludes loans guaranteed by U.S. government-sponsored entities.
(4)
Consists of residential first mortgages that are guaranteed by U.S. government-sponsored entities that are 30–89 days past due of
$0.2 billion
and
90
days or more past due of
$1.0 billion
.
(5)
Includes approximately
$0.1 billion
of residential first mortgage loans in process of foreclosure.
(6)
Includes approximately
$0.1 billion
of home equity loans in process of foreclosure.
(7)
Fixed-rate home equity loans and loans extended under home equity lines of credit, which are typically in junior lien positions.
(8)
Represents loans classified as consumer loans on the Consolidated Balance Sheet that are not included in
GCB
or
Corporate/Other
consumer credit metrics.
Consumer Credit Scores (FICO)
The following tables provide details on the FICO scores for Citi’s U.S. consumer loan portfolio based on end-of-period receivables (commercial banking loans are excluded from the table since they are business based and FICO scores are not a primary driver in their credit evaluation). FICO scores are updated monthly for substantially all of the portfolio or, otherwise, on a quarterly basis for the remaining portfolio.
FICO score distribution in U.S. portfolio
(1)(2)
September 30, 2018
In millions of dollars
Less than
680
680 to 760
Greater
than 760
Residential first mortgages
$
4,647
$
13,854
$
26,553
Home equity loans
2,575
4,495
4,692
Credit cards
31,379
56,636
47,675
Installment and other
624
1,080
1,189
Total
$
39,225
$
76,065
$
80,109
FICO score distribution in U.S. portfolio
(1)(2)
December 31, 2017
In millions of dollars
Less than
680
680 to 760
Greater
than 760
Residential first mortgages
$
5,603
$
14,423
$
26,271
Home equity loans
3,347
5,439
5,650
Credit cards
30,875
56,443
48,989
Installment and other
716
1,020
1,275
Total
$
40,541
$
77,325
$
82,185
(1)
Excludes loans guaranteed by U.S. government entities, loans subject to long-term standby commitments (LTSC) with U.S. government-sponsored entities and loans recorded at fair value.
(2)
Excludes balances where FICO was not available. Such amounts are not material.
125
Loan to Value (LTV) Ratios
The following tables provide details on the LTV ratios for Citi’s U.S. consumer mortgage portfolios. LTV ratios are updated monthly using the most recent Core Logic Home Price Index data available for substantially all of the portfolio applied at the Metropolitan Statistical Area level, if available, or the state level if not. The remainder of the portfolio is updated in a similar manner using the Federal Housing Finance Agency indices.
LTV distribution in U.S. portfolio
(1)(2)
September 30, 2018
In millions of dollars
Less than or
equal to 80%
> 80% but less
than or equal to
100%
Greater
than
100%
Residential first mortgages
$
42,823
$
2,205
$
151
Home equity loans
9,884
1,366
446
Total
$
52,707
$
3,571
$
597
LTV distribution in U.S. portfolio
(1)(2)
December 31, 2017
In millions of dollars
Less than or
equal to 80%
> 80% but less
than or equal to
100%
Greater
than
100%
Residential first mortgages
$
43,626
$
2,578
$
247
Home equity loans
11,403
2,147
800
Total
$
55,029
$
4,725
$
1,047
(1)
Excludes loans guaranteed by U.S. government entities, loans subject to LTSCs with U.S. government-sponsored entities and loans recorded at fair value.
(2)
Excludes balances where LTV was not available. Such amounts are not material.
126
Impaired Consumer Loans
The following tables present information about impaired consumer loans and interest income recognized on impaired consumer loans:
Three Months Ended
September 30,
Nine Months Ended September 30,
Balance at September 30, 2018
2018
2017
2018
2017
In millions of dollars
Recorded
investment
(1)(2)
Unpaid
principal balance
Related
specific allowance
(3)
Average
carrying value
(4)
Interest income
recognized
(5)
Interest income
recognized
(5)
Interest income
recognized
(5)
Interest income
recognized
(5)
Mortgage and real estate
Residential first mortgages
$
2,294
$
2,508
$
197
$
2,670
$
21
$
29
$
63
$
97
Home equity loans
704
980
125
815
2
7
10
21
Credit cards
1,801
1,828
654
1,807
24
37
79
110
Installment and other
Individual installment and other
406
436
153
421
5
5
17
18
Commercial banking
296
441
46
306
2
4
10
18
Total
$
5,501
$
6,193
$
1,175
$
6,019
$
54
$
82
$
179
$
264
(1)
Recorded investment in a loan includes net deferred loan fees and costs, unamortized premium or discount and direct write-downs and includes accrued interest only on credit card loans.
(2)
$529 million
of residential first mortgages,
$270 million
of home equity loans and
$25 million
of commercial market loans do not have a specific allowance.
(3) Included in the
Allowance for loan losses
.
(4)
Average carrying value represents the average recorded investment ending balance for the last
four
quarters and does not include the related specific allowance.
(5) Includes amounts recognized on both an accrual and cash basis.
Balance, December 31, 2017
In millions of dollars
Recorded
investment
(1)(2)
Unpaid
principal balance
Related
specific allowance
(3)
Average
carrying value
(4)
Mortgage and real estate
Residential first mortgages
$
2,877
$
3,121
$
278
$
3,155
Home equity loans
1,151
1,590
216
1,181
Credit cards
1,787
1,819
614
1,803
Installment and other
Individual installment and other
431
460
175
415
Commercial banking
334
541
51
429
Total
$
6,580
$
7,531
$
1,334
$
6,983
(1)
Recorded investment in a loan includes net deferred loan fees and costs, unamortized premium or discount and direct write-downs and includes accrued interest only on credit card loans.
(2)
$607 million
of residential first mortgages,
$370 million
of home equity loans and
$10 million
of commercial market loans do not have a specific allowance.
(3)
Included in the
Allowance for loan losses
.
(4)
Average carrying value represents the average recorded investment ending balance for the last
four
quarters and does not include the related specific allowance.
127
Consumer Troubled Debt Restructurings
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2018
In millions of dollars, except number of loans modified
Number of
loans modified
Post-
modification
recorded
investment
(1)(2)
Deferred
principal
(3)
Contingent
principal
forgiveness
(4)
Principal
forgiveness
(5)
Average
interest rate
reduction
North America
Residential first mortgages
461
$
66
$
—
$
—
$
—
—
%
Home equity loans
261
26
1
—
—
1
Credit cards
61,508
253
—
—
—
18
Installment and other revolving
322
2
—
—
—
5
Commercial banking
(6)
11
3
—
—
—
—
Total
(8)
62,563
$
350
$
1
$
—
$
—
International
Residential first mortgages
660
$
22
$
—
$
—
$
—
—
%
Credit cards
18,413
77
—
—
2
17
Installment and other revolving
6,421
34
—
—
2
10
Commercial banking
(6)
131
9
—
—
—
—
Total
(8)
25,625
$
142
$
—
$
—
$
4
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2017
In millions of dollars, except number of loans modified
Number of
loans modified
Post-
modification
recorded
investment
(1)(7)
Deferred
principal
(3)
Contingent
principal
forgiveness
(4)
Principal
forgiveness
(5)
Average
interest rate
reduction
North America
Residential first mortgages
1,400
$
199
$
1
$
—
$
—
—
%
Home equity loans
830
70
5
—
—
1
Credit cards
59,285
225
—
—
—
17
Installment and other revolving
299
2
—
—
—
6
Commercial banking
(6)
33
59
—
—
—
—
Total
(8)
61,847
$
555
$
6
$
—
$
—
International
Residential first mortgages
703
$
25
$
—
$
—
$
—
—
%
Credit cards
28,254
103
—
—
2
11
Installment and other revolving
11,725
70
—
—
3
11
Commercial banking
(6)
97
11
—
—
—
—
Total
(8)
40,779
$
209
$
—
$
—
$
5
(1)
Post-modification balances include past due amounts that are capitalized at the modification date.
(2)
Post-modification balances in
North America
include
$10 million
of residential first mortgages and
$2 million
of home equity loans to borrowers who have gone through Chapter 7 bankruptcy in the three months ended
September 30, 2018
. These amounts include
$7 million
of residential first mortgages and
$2 million
of home equity loans that were newly classified as TDRs in the three months ended
September 30, 2018
, based on previously received OCC guidance.
(3)
Represents portion of contractual loan principal that is non-interest bearing, but still due from the borrower. Such deferred principal is charged off at the time of permanent modification to the extent that the related loan balance exceeds the underlying collateral value.
(4)
Represents portion of contractual loan principal that is non-interest bearing and, depending upon borrower performance, eligible for forgiveness.
(5)
Represents portion of contractual loan principal that was forgiven at the time of permanent modification.
(6)
Commercial banking loans are generally borrower-specific modifications and incorporate changes in the amount and/or timing of principal and/or interest.
(7)
Post-modification balances in
North America
include $
12 million
of residential first mortgages and $
5 million
of home equity loans to borrowers who have gone through Chapter 7 bankruptcy in the three months ended
September 30, 2017
. These amounts include $
7 million
of residential first mortgages and $
5 million
of home equity loans that were newly classified as TDRs in the three months ended
September 30, 2017
, based on previously received OCC guidance.
(8)
The above tables reflect activity for loans outstanding that were considered TDRs as of the end of the reporting period.
128
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018
In millions of dollars, except number of loans modified
Number of
loans modified
Post-
modification
recorded
investment
(1)(2)
Deferred
principal
(3)
Contingent
principal
forgiveness
(4)
Principal
forgiveness
(5)
Average
interest rate
reduction
North America
Residential first mortgages
1,544
$
233
$
2
$
—
$
—
—
%
Home equity loans
1,097
104
4
—
—
1
Credit cards
180,170
717
—
—
—
17
Installment and other revolving
956
7
—
—
—
5
Commercial banking
(6)
37
5
—
—
—
—
Total
(8)
183,804
$
1,066
$
6
$
—
$
—
International
Residential first mortgages
1,833
$
62
$
—
$
—
$
—
—
%
Credit cards
59,589
249
—
—
7
16
Installment and other revolving
22,918
136
—
—
6
10
Commercial banking
(6)
433
60
—
—
—
1
Total
(8)
84,773
$
507
$
—
$
—
$
13
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017
In millions of dollars, except number of loans modified
Number of
loans modified
Post-
modification
recorded
investment
(1)(7)
Deferred
principal
(3)
Contingent
principal
forgiveness
(4)
Principal
forgiveness
(5)
Average
interest rate
reduction
North America
Residential first mortgages
3,172
$
445
$
5
$
—
$
2
1
%
Home equity loans
2,186
185
13
—
—
1
Credit cards
171,702
659
—
—
—
17
Installment and other revolving
770
6
—
—
—
5
Commercial banking
(6)
89
107
—
—
—
—
Total
(8)
177,919
$
1,402
$
18
$
—
$
2
International
Residential first mortgages
2,071
$
80
$
—
$
—
$
—
—
%
Credit cards
82,042
286
—
—
6
12
Installment and other revolving
34,654
194
—
—
9
9
Commercial banking
(6)
182
30
—
—
—
—
Total
(8)
118,949
$
590
$
—
$
—
$
15
(1)
Post-modification balances include past due amounts that are capitalized at the modification date.
(2)
Post-modification balances in
North America
include $
29 million
of residential first mortgages and $
10 million
of home equity loans to borrowers who have gone through Chapter 7 bankruptcy in the nine months ended September 30, 2018. These amounts include $
20 million
of residential first mortgages and $
9 million
of home equity loans that were newly classified as TDRs in the nine months ended September 30, 2018, based on previously received OCC guidance.
(3)
Represents portion of contractual loan principal that is non-interest bearing but still due from the borrower. Such deferred principal is charged off at the time of permanent modification to the extent that the related loan balance exceeds the underlying collateral value.
(4)
Represents portion of contractual loan principal that is non-interest bearing and, depending upon borrower performance, eligible for forgiveness.
(5)
Represents portion of contractual loan principal that was forgiven at the time of permanent modification.
(6)
Commercial banking loans are generally borrower-specific modifications and incorporate changes in the amount and/or timing of principal and/or interest.
(7)
Post-modification balances in
North America
include $
42 million
of residential first mortgages and $
16 million
of home equity loans to borrowers who have gone through Chapter 7 bankruptcy in the nine months ended
September 30, 2017
. These amounts include $
28 million
of residential first mortgages and $
14 million
of home equity loans that were newly classified as TDRs in the nine months ended
September 30, 2017
, based on previously received OCC guidance.
(8)
The above tables reflect activity for loans outstanding that were considered TDRs as of the end of the reporting period.
129
The following table presents consumer TDRs that defaulted for which the payment default occurred within
one year
of a permanent modification. Default is defined as
60 days
past due, except for classifiably managed commercial banking loans, where default is defined as
90 days
past due.
Three Months Ended September 30,
Nine Months Ended September 30,
In millions of dollars
2018
2017
2018
2017
North America
Residential first mortgages
$
31
$
57
$
105
$
156
Home equity loans
5
8
21
25
Credit cards
57
54
173
163
Installment and other revolving
1
1
2
2
Commercial banking
1
—
22
2
Total
$
95
$
120
$
323
$
348
International
Residential first mortgages
$
2
$
3
$
6
$
8
Credit cards
48
48
156
136
Installment and other revolving
18
25
62
71
Commercial banking
7
—
17
—
Total
$
75
$
76
$
241
$
215
Corporate Loans
Corporate loans represent loans and leases managed by
ICG
. The following table presents information by corporate loan type:
In millions of dollars
September 30,
2018
December 31,
2017
In U.S. offices
Commercial and industrial
$
51,365
$
51,319
Financial institutions
46,255
39,128
Mortgage and real estate
(1)
47,629
44,683
Installment, revolving credit and other
32,201
33,181
Lease financing
1,445
1,470
$
178,895
$
169,781
In offices outside the U.S.
Commercial and industrial
$
98,281
$
93,750
Financial institutions
37,851
35,273
Mortgage and real estate
(1)
7,344
7,309
Installment, revolving credit and other
22,827
22,638
Lease financing
131
190
Governments and official institutions
4,898
5,200
$
171,332
$
164,360
Total corporate loans
$
350,227
$
334,141
Net unearned income
$
(787
)
$
(763
)
Corporate loans, net of unearned income
$
349,440
$
333,378
(1)
Loans secured primarily by real estate.
The Company sold and/or reclassified to held-for-sale
$0.3 billion
and
$0.8 billion
of corporate loans during the
three and nine months
ended
September 30, 2018
, respectively, and
$0.1 billion
and
$0.6 billion
during
three and nine months
ended September 30, 2017, respectively. The Company did not have significant purchases of corporate loans classified as held-for-investment for the
three and nine months
ended
September 30, 2018
or
2017
.
130
Corporate Loan Delinquency and Non-Accrual Details at
September 30, 2018
In millions of dollars
30–89 days
past due
and accruing
(1)
≥ 90 days
past due and
accruing
(1)
Total past due
and accruing
Total
non-accrual
(2)
Total
current
(3)
Total
loans
(4)
Commercial and industrial
$
430
$
30
$
460
$
1,123
$
145,612
$
147,195
Financial institutions
146
9
155
74
82,299
82,528
Mortgage and real estate
209
5
214
258
54,492
54,964
Leases
16
3
19
—
1,557
1,576
Other
79
41
120
85
58,754
58,959
Loans at fair value
4,218
Total
$
880
$
88
$
968
$
1,540
$
342,714
$
349,440
Corporate Loan Delinquency and Non-Accrual Details at
December 31, 2017
In millions of dollars
30–89 days
past due
and accruing
(1)
≥ 90 days
past due and
accruing
(1)
Total past due
and accruing
Total
non-accrual
(2)
Total
current
(3)
Total
loans
(4)
Commercial and industrial
$
249
$
13
$
262
$
1,506
$
139,554
$
141,322
Financial institutions
93
15
108
92
73,557
73,757
Mortgage and real estate
147
59
206
195
51,563
51,964
Leases
68
8
76
46
1,533
1,655
Other
70
13
83
103
60,145
60,331
Loans at fair value
4,349
Total
$
627
$
108
$
735
$
1,942
$
326,352
$
333,378
(1)
Corporate loans that are
90
days past due are generally classified as non-accrual. Corporate loans are considered past due when principal or interest is contractually due but unpaid.
(2)
Non-accrual loans generally include those loans that are ≥
90
days past due or those loans for which Citi believes, based on actual experience and a forward-looking assessment of the collectability of the loan in full, that the payment of interest or principal is doubtful.
(3)
Loans less than
30
days past due are presented as current.
(4)
Total loans include loans at fair value, which are not included in the various delinquency columns.
131
Corporate Loans Credit Quality Indicators
Recorded investment in loans
(1)
In millions of dollars
September 30,
2018
December 31,
2017
Investment grade
(2)
Commercial and industrial
$
102,875
$
101,313
Financial institutions
70,435
60,404
Mortgage and real estate
24,351
23,213
Leases
1,054
1,090
Other
53,609
56,306
Total investment grade
$
252,324
$
242,326
Non-investment grade
(2)
Accrual
Commercial and industrial
$
43,196
$
38,503
Financial institutions
12,019
13,261
Mortgage and real estate
3,240
2,881
Leases
523
518
Other
5,264
3,924
Non-accrual
Commercial and industrial
1,123
1,506
Financial institutions
74
92
Mortgage and real estate
258
195
Leases
—
46
Other
85
103
Total non-investment grade
$
65,782
$
61,029
Non-rated private bank loans managed on a delinquency basis
(2)
$
27,116
$
25,674
Loans at fair value
4,218
4,349
Corporate loans, net of unearned income
$
349,440
$
333,378
(1)
Recorded investment in a loan includes net deferred loan fees and costs, unamortized premium or discount, less any direct write-downs.
(2)
Held-for-investment loans are accounted for on an amortized cost basis.
132
Non-Accrual Corporate Loans
The following tables present non-accrual loan information by corporate loan type and interest income recognized on non-accrual corporate loans:
September 30, 2018
Three Months Ended
September 30, 2018
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2018
In millions of dollars
Recorded
investment
(1)
Unpaid
principal balance
Related specific
allowance
Average
carrying
value
(2)
Interest
income recognized
(3)
Interest income recognized
(3)
Non-accrual corporate loans
Commercial and industrial
$
1,123
$
1,379
$
207
$
1,246
$
8
$
24
Financial institutions
74
90
39
97
—
—
Mortgage and real estate
258
423
45
228
—
1
Lease financing
—
39
—
33
—
—
Other
85
205
13
90
—
—
Total non-accrual corporate loans
$
1,540
$
2,136
$
304
$
1,694
$
8
$
25
December 31, 2017
In millions of dollars
Recorded
investment
(1)
Unpaid
principal balance
Related specific
allowance
Average
carrying
value
(2)
Non-accrual corporate loans
Commercial and industrial
$
1,506
$
1,775
$
368
$
1,547
Financial institutions
92
102
41
212
Mortgage and real estate
195
324
11
183
Lease financing
46
46
4
59
Other
103
212
2
108
Total non-accrual corporate loans
$
1,942
$
2,459
$
426
$
2,109
September 30, 2018
December 31, 2017
In millions of dollars
Recorded
investment
(1)
Related specific
allowance
Recorded
investment
(1)
Related specific
allowance
Non-accrual corporate loans with valuation allowances
Commercial and industrial
$
643
$
207
$
1,017
$
368
Financial institutions
72
39
88
41
Mortgage and real estate
122
45
51
11
Lease financing
—
—
46
4
Other
17
13
13
2
Total non-accrual corporate loans with specific allowance
$
854
$
304
$
1,215
$
426
Non-accrual corporate loans without specific allowance
Commercial and industrial
$
480
$
489
Financial institutions
2
4
Mortgage and real estate
136
144
Lease financing
—
—
Other
68
90
Total non-accrual corporate loans without specific allowance
$
686
N/A
$
727
N/A
(1)
Recorded investment in a loan includes net deferred loan fees and costs, unamortized premium or discount, less any direct write-downs.
(2)
Average carrying value represents the average recorded investment balance and does not include related specific allowance.
(3)
Interest income recognized for the
three and nine months
ended
September 30
,
2017
was
$11 million
and
$30 million
, respectively.
N/A Not applicable
133
Corporate Troubled Debt Restructurings
For the three months ended
September 30, 2018
:
In millions of dollars
Carrying value of TDRs modified during the period
TDRs
involving changes
in the amount
and/or timing of
principal payments
(1)
TDRs
involving changes
in the amount
and/or timing of
interest payments
(2)
TDRs
involving changes
in the amount
and/or timing of
both principal and
interest payments
Commercial and industrial
$
62
$
1
$
4
$
57
Mortgage and real estate
3
—
—
3
Total
$
65
$
1
$
4
$
60
For the three months ended
September 30, 2017
:
In millions of dollars
Carrying value of TDRs modified during the period
TDRs
involving changes
in the amount
and/or timing of
principal payments
(1)
TDRs
involving changes
in the amount
and/or timing of
interest payments
(2)
TDRs
involving changes
in the amount
and/or timing of
both principal and
interest payments
Commercial and industrial
$
175
$
99
$
—
$
76
Mortgage and real estate
14
—
—
14
Total
$
189
$
99
$
—
$
90
For the nine months ended
September 30, 2018
:
In millions of dollars
Carrying value of TDRs modified during the period
TDRs
involving changes
in the amount
and/or timing of
principal payments
(1)
TDRs
involving changes
in the amount
and/or timing of
interest payments
(2)
TDRs
involving changes
in the amount
and/or timing of
both principal and
interest payments
Commercial and industrial
$
103
$
5
$
8
$
90
Mortgage and real estate
6
—
—
6
Total
$
109
$
5
$
8
$
96
For the nine months ended
September 30, 2017
:
In millions of dollars
Carrying value of TDRs modified during the period
TDRs
involving changes
in the amount
and/or timing of
principal payments
(1)
TDRs
involving changes
in the amount
and/or timing of
interest payments
(2)
TDRs
involving changes
in the amount
and/or timing of
both principal and
interest payments
Commercial and industrial
$
463
$
131
$
—
$
332
Mortgage and real estate
15
—
—
15
Other
18
—
—
18
Total
$
496
$
131
$
—
$
365
(1)
TDRs involving changes in the amount or timing of principal payments may involve principal forgiveness or deferral of periodic and/or final principal payments. Because forgiveness of principal is rare for corporate loans, modifications typically have little to no impact on the loans’ projected cash flows and thus little to no impact on the allowance established for the loans. Charge-offs for amounts deemed uncollectable may be recorded at the time of the restructuring or may have already been recorded in prior periods such that no charge-off is required at the time of the modification.
(2)
TDRs involving changes in the amount or timing of interest payments may involve a below-market interest rate.
134
The following table presents total corporate loans modified in a TDR as well as those TDRs that defaulted and for which the payment default occurred within
one year
of a permanent modification. Default is defined as
60 days
past due, except for classifiably managed commercial banking loans, where default is defined as
90 days
past due.
In millions of dollars
TDR balances at September 30, 2018
TDR loans in payment default during the three months ended
September 30, 2018
TDR loans in payment default nine months ended September 30, 2018
TDR balances at September 30, 2017
TDR loans in payment default during the three months ended September 30, 2017
TDR loans in payment default during the nine months ended
September 30, 2017
Commercial and industrial
$
480
$
—
$
70
$
686
$
—
$
12
Financial institutions
21
—
—
24
—
3
Mortgage and real estate
71
—
—
84
—
—
Other
42
—
—
155
—
—
Total
(1)
$
614
$
—
$
70
$
949
$
—
$
15
(1)
The above table reflects activity for loans outstanding that were considered TDRs as of the end of the reporting period.
135
14. ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES
Three Months Ended September 30,
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
In millions of dollars
2018
2017
2018
2017
Allowance for loan losses at beginning of period
$
12,126
$
12,025
$
12,355
$
12,060
Gross credit losses
(2,094
)
(2,120
)
(6,499
)
(6,394
)
Gross recoveries
(1)
338
343
1,172
1,198
Net credit losses (NCLs)
$
(1,756
)
$
(1,777
)
$
(5,327
)
$
(5,196
)
NCLs
$
1,756
$
1,777
$
5,327
$
5,196
Net reserve builds (releases)
169
419
302
466
Net specific reserve builds (releases)
(19
)
(50
)
(125
)
(175
)
Total provision for loan losses
$
1,906
$
2,146
$
5,504
$
5,487
Other, net (see table below)
60
(28
)
(196
)
15
Allowance for loan losses at end of period
$
12,336
$
12,366
$
12,336
$
12,366
Allowance for credit losses on unfunded lending commitments at beginning of period
$
1,278
$
1,406
$
1,258
$
1,418
Provision (release) for unfunded lending commitments
42
(175
)
66
(190
)
Other, net
1
1
(3
)
4
Allowance for credit losses on unfunded lending commitments at end of period
(2)
$
1,321
$
1,232
$
1,321
$
1,232
Total allowance for loans, leases and unfunded lending commitments
$
13,657
$
13,598
$
13,657
$
13,598
(1)
Recoveries have been reduced by certain collection costs that are incurred only if collection efforts are successful.
(2)
Represents additional credit loss reserves for unfunded lending commitments and letters of credit recorded in
Other liabilities
on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Other, net details
Three Months Ended September 30,
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
In millions of dollars
2018
2017
2018
2017
Sales or transfers of various consumer loan portfolios to HFS
Transfer of real estate loan portfolios
$
(2
)
$
(28
)
$
(88
)
$
(84
)
Transfer of other loan portfolios
(3
)
(6
)
(109
)
(130
)
Sales or transfers of various consumer loan portfolios to HFS
$
(5
)
$
(34
)
$
(197
)
$
(214
)
FX translation, consumer
62
7
16
221
Other
3
(1
)
(15
)
8
Other, net
$
60
$
(28
)
$
(196
)
$
15
Allowance for Credit Losses and Investment in Loans
Three Months Ended
September 30, 2018
September 30, 2017
In millions of dollars
Corporate
Consumer
Total
Corporate
Consumer
Total
Allowance for loan losses at beginning of period
$
2,330
$
9,796
$
12,126
$
2,510
$
9,515
$
12,025
Charge-offs
(36
)
(2,058
)
(2,094
)
(49
)
(2,071
)
(2,120
)
Recoveries
6
332
338
6
337
343
Replenishment of net charge-offs
30
1,726
1,756
43
1,734
1,777
Net reserve builds (releases)
34
135
169
(60
)
479
419
Net specific reserve builds (releases)
(27
)
8
(19
)
21
(71
)
(50
)
Other
2
58
60
3
(31
)
(28
)
Ending balance
$
2,339
$
9,997
$
12,336
$
2,474
$
9,892
$
12,366
136
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2018
September 30, 2017
In millions of dollars
Corporate
Consumer
Total
Corporate
Consumer
Total
Allowance for loan losses at beginning of period
$
2,486
$
9,869
$
12,355
$
2,702
$
9,358
$
12,060
Charge-offs
(195
)
(6,304
)
(6,499
)
(248
)
(6,146
)
(6,394
)
Recoveries
71
1,101
1,172
91
1,107
1,198
Replenishment of net charge-offs
124
5,203
5,327
157
5,039
5,196
Net reserve builds (releases)
(15
)
317
302
(230
)
696
466
Net specific reserve builds (releases)
(119
)
(6
)
(125
)
(18
)
(157
)
(175
)
Other
(13
)
(183
)
(196
)
20
(5
)
15
Ending balance
$
2,339
$
9,997
$
12,336
$
2,474
$
9,892
$
12,366
September 30, 2018
December 31, 2017
In millions of dollars
Corporate
Consumer
Total
Corporate
Consumer
Total
Allowance for loan losses
Collectively evaluated in accordance with ASC 450
$
2,035
$
8,820
$
10,855
$
2,060
$
8,531
$
10,591
Individually evaluated in accordance with ASC 310-10-35
304
1,175
1,479
426
1,334
1,760
Purchased credit impaired in accordance with ASC 310-30
—
2
2
—
4
4
Total allowance for loan losses
$
2,339
$
9,997
$
12,336
$
2,486
$
9,869
$
12,355
Loans, net of unearned income
Collectively evaluated in accordance with ASC 450
$
343,774
$
319,816
$
663,590
$
327,142
$
326,884
$
654,026
Individually evaluated in accordance with ASC 310-10-35
1,448
5,501
6,949
1,887
6,580
8,467
Purchased credit impaired in accordance with ASC 310-30
—
131
131
—
167
167
Held at fair value
4,218
21
4,239
4,349
25
4,374
Total loans, net of unearned income
$
349,440
$
325,469
$
674,909
$
333,378
$
333,656
$
667,034
137
15. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Goodwill
The changes in
Goodwill
were as follows:
In millions of dollars
Global Consumer Banking
Institutional Clients Group
Corporate/Other
Total
Balance at December 31, 2017
$
12,784
$
9,456
$
16
$
22,256
Foreign currency translation and other
$
184
$
235
$
—
$
419
Divestiture
(1)
—
—
(16
)
(16
)
Balance at March 31, 2018
$
12,968
$
9,691
$
—
$
22,659
Foreign exchange translation and other
$
(226
)
$
(375
)
$
—
$
(601
)
Balance at June 30, 2018
$
12,742
$
9,316
$
—
$
22,058
Foreign exchange translation and other
$
7
$
122
$
—
$
129
Balance at September 30, 2018
$
12,749
$
9,438
$
—
$
22,187
(1)
Goodwill allocated to the sale of the Citi Colombia consumer business, the only remaining business in Citi Holdings—Consumer
Latin America
reporting unit reported as part of
Corporate/Other
, which was classified as HFS beginning the first quarter of 2018. The sale was completed during the second quarter of 2018.
Goodwill impairment testing is performed at the level below each business segment (referred to as a reporting unit). See Note 3 for further information on business segments. For additional information regarding Citi’s goodwill impairment testing process, see Notes 1 and 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Citi’s 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The Company performed its annual goodwill impairment test as of July 1, 2018. The fair values of the Company’s reporting units exceeded their carrying values by approximately
14%
to
243%
and no reporting unit is at risk of impairment. Further, there were no triggering events identified and
no
goodwill was impaired during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018.
Intangible Assets
The components of intangible assets were as follows:
September 30, 2018
December 31, 2017
In millions of dollars
Gross
carrying
amount
Accumulated
amortization
Net
carrying
amount
Gross
carrying
amount
Accumulated
amortization
Net
carrying
amount
Purchased credit card relationships
$
5,732
$
3,890
$
1,842
$
5,375
$
3,836
$
1,539
Credit card contract related intangibles
(1)
5,042
2,708
2,334
5,045
2,456
2,589
Core deposit intangibles
438
433
5
639
628
11
Other customer relationships
463
289
174
459
272
187
Present value of future profits
34
30
4
32
28
4
Indefinite-lived intangible assets
227
—
227
244
—
244
Other
84
72
12
100
86
14
Intangible assets (excluding MSRs)
$
12,020
$
7,422
$
4,598
$
11,894
$
7,306
$
4,588
Mortgage servicing rights (MSRs)
(2)
618
—
618
558
—
558
Total intangible assets
$
12,638
$
7,422
$
5,216
$
12,452
$
7,306
$
5,146
(1)
Primarily reflects contract-related intangibles associated with the American Airlines, The Home Depot, Costco, Sears and AT&T credit card program agreements, which represented
97%
of the aggregate net carrying amount as of September 30, 2018.
(2)
For additional information on Citi’s MSRs, see Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
138
The changes in intangible assets were as follows:
Net carrying
amount at
Net carrying
amount at
In millions of dollars
December 31,
2017
Acquisitions/
divestitures
Amortization
FX translation and other
September 30,
2018
Purchased credit card relationships
(1)
$
1,539
$
429
$
(124
)
$
(2
)
$
1,842
Credit card contract related intangibles
(2)
2,589
—
(255
)
—
2,334
Core deposit intangibles
11
—
(6
)
—
5
Other customer relationships
187
—
(19
)
6
174
Present value of future profits
4
—
—
—
4
Indefinite-lived intangible assets
244
—
—
(17
)
227
Other
14
—
(9
)
7
12
Intangible assets (excluding MSRs)
$
4,588
$
429
$
(413
)
$
(6
)
$
4,598
Mortgage servicing rights (MSRs)
(3)
558
618
Total intangible assets
$
5,146
$
5,216
(1)
Reflects intangibles for the value of cardholder relationships, which are discrete from partner contract intangibles and include credit card accounts primarily in the Costco, Macy’s and Sears portfolios. The increase since December 31, 2017 reflects the purchase of certain rights related to credit card accounts in the Sears portfolio.
(2)
Primarily reflects contract-related intangibles associated with the American Airlines, The Home Depot, Costco, Sears and AT&T credit card program agreements, which represented
97%
of the aggregate net carrying amount at
September 30, 2018
and
December 31, 2017
.
(3)
For additional information on Citi’s MSRs, including the rollforward for the nine months ended
September 30, 2018
, see Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
139
16. DEBT
For additional information regarding Citi’s short-term borrowings and long-term debt, see Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Citi’s
2017
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Short-Term Borrowings
In millions of dollars
September 30,
2018
December 31,
2017
Commercial paper
$
12,051
$
9,940
Other borrowings
(1)
21,719
34,512
Total
$
33,770
$
44,452
(1)
Includes borrowings from Federal Home Loan Banks and other market participants. At
September 30, 2018
and
December 31, 2017
, collateralized short-term advances from the Federal Home Loan Banks were
$10.5 billion
and
$23.8 billion
, respectively.
Long-Term Debt
In millions of dollars
September 30,
2018
December 31, 2017
Citigroup Inc.
(1)
$
148,183
$
152,163
Bank
(2)
62,085
65,856
Broker-dealer and other
(3)
25,002
18,690
Total
$
235,270
$
236,709
(1)
Represents the parent holding company.
(2)
Represents Citibank entities as well as other bank entities. At
September 30, 2018
and
December 31, 2017
, collateralized long-term advances from the Federal Home Loan Banks were
$10.5 billion
and
$19.3 billion
, respectively.
(3)
Represents broker-dealer and other non-bank subsidiaries that are consolidated into Citigroup Inc., the parent holding company.
Long-term debt
outstanding includes trust preferred securities with a balance sheet carrying value of
$1.7 billion
at both
September 30, 2018
and
December 31, 2017
.
The following table summarizes Citi’s outstanding trust preferred securities at
September 30, 2018
:
Junior subordinated debentures owned by trust
Trust
Issuance
date
Securities
issued
Liquidation
value
(1)
Coupon
rate
(2)
Common
shares
issued
to parent
Amount
Maturity
Redeemable
by issuer
beginning
In millions of dollars, except share amounts
Citigroup Capital III
Dec. 1996
194,053
$
194
7.625
%
6,003
$
200
Dec. 1, 2036
Not redeemable
Citigroup Capital XIII
Sept. 2010
89,840,000
2,246
3 mo LIBOR + 637 bps
1,000
2,246
Oct. 30, 2040
Oct. 30, 2015
Citigroup Capital XVIII
Jun. 2007
99,901
130
3 mo LIBOR + 88.75 bps
50
130
Jun. 28, 2067
June 28, 2017
Total obligated
$
2,570
$
2,576
Note: Distributions on the trust preferred securities and interest on the subordinated debentures are payable semiannually for Citigroup Capital III and Citigroup Capital XVIII and quarterly for Citigroup Capital XIII.
(1)
Represents the notional value received by outside investors from the trusts at the time of issuance.
(2)
In each case, the coupon rate on the subordinated debentures is the same as that on the trust preferred securities.
140
17. CHANGES IN ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) (AOCI)
Changes in each component of Citigroup’s
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
were as follows:
Three Months Ended September 30, 2018
In millions of dollars
Net
unrealized
gains (losses)
on investment securities
Debt valuation adjustment (DVA)
Cash flow hedges
(1)
Benefit plans
(2)
Foreign
currency
translation
adjustment (CTA), net of hedges
(3)
Excluded component of fair value hedges
(4)
Accumulated
other
comprehensive income (loss)
Balance, June 30, 2018
$
(2,717
)
$
(475
)
$
(1,021
)
$
(5,794
)
$
(27,455
)
$
(32
)
$
(37,494
)
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications
(601
)
(294
)
(114
)
(14
)
(221
)
10
(1,234
)
Increase (decrease) due to amounts reclassified from AOCI
(4
)
7
40
40
—
—
83
Change, net of taxes
$
(605
)
$
(287
)
$
(74
)
$
26
$
(221
)
$
10
$
(1,151
)
Balance at September 30, 2018
$
(3,322
)
$
(762
)
$
(1,095
)
$
(5,768
)
$
(27,676
)
$
(22
)
$
(38,645
)
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018
In millions of dollars
Net
unrealized
gains (losses)
on investment securities
Debt valuation adjustment (DVA)
Cash flow hedges
(1)
Benefit plans
(2)
Foreign
currency
translation
adjustment (CTA), net of hedges
(3)
Excluded component of fair value hedges
(4)
Accumulated
other
comprehensive income (loss)
Balance, December 31, 2017
$
(1,158
)
$
(921
)
$
(698
)
$
(6,183
)
$
(25,708
)
$
—
$
(34,668
)
Adjustment to opening balance, net of taxes
(5)
(3
)
—
—
—
—
—
(3
)
Adjusted balance, beginning of period
$
(1,161
)
$
(921
)
$
(698
)
$
(6,183
)
$
(25,708
)
$
—
$
(34,671
)
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications
(1,984
)
123
(393
)
288
(1,968
)
(22
)
(3,956
)
Increase (decrease) due to amounts reclassified from AOCI
(177
)
36
(4
)
127
—
—
(18
)
Change, net of taxes
$
(2,161
)
$
159
$
(397
)
$
415
$
(1,968
)
$
(22
)
$
(3,974
)
Balance, September 30, 2018
$
(3,322
)
$
(762
)
$
(1,095
)
$
(5,768
)
$
(27,676
)
$
(22
)
$
(38,645
)
Note: Footnotes to the tables above appear on the following page.
141
Three Months Ended September 30, 2017
In millions of dollars
Net
unrealized
gains (losses)
on investment securities
Debt valuation adjustment (DVA)
Cash flow hedges
(1)
Benefit plans
(2)
Foreign
currency
translation
adjustment (CTA), net of hedges
(3)
Excluded component of fair value hedges
(4)
Accumulated
other
comprehensive income (loss)
Balance, June 30, 2017
$
(102
)
$
(496
)
$
(445
)
$
(5,311
)
$
(23,545
)
$
—
$
(29,899
)
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications
60
(125
)
(27
)
(71
)
218
—
55
Increase (decrease) due to amounts reclassified from AOCI
(126
)
2
35
42
—
—
(47
)
Change, net of taxes
$
(66
)
$
(123
)
$
8
$
(29
)
$
218
$
—
$
8
Balance, September 30, 2017
$
(168
)
$
(619
)
$
(437
)
$
(5,340
)
$
(23,327
)
$
—
$
(29,891
)
Nine Months Ended September 30,
2017
In millions of dollars
Net
unrealized
gains (losses)
on investment securities
Debt valuation adjustment (DVA)
Cash flow hedges
(1)
Benefit plans
(2)
Foreign
currency
translation
adjustment (CTA), net of hedges
(3)
Excluded component of fair value hedges
(4)
Accumulated
other
comprehensive income (loss)
Balance, December 31, 2016
$
(799
)
$
(352
)
$
(560
)
$
(5,164
)
$
(25,506
)
$
—
$
(32,381
)
Adjustment to opening balance, net of taxes
(6)
504
—
—
—
—
—
504
Adjusted balance, beginning of period
$
(295
)
$
(352
)
$
(560
)
$
(5,164
)
$
(25,506
)
$
—
$
(31,877
)
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications
495
(259
)
59
(293
)
2,326
—
2,328
Increase (decrease) due to amounts reclassified from AOCI
(368
)
(8
)
64
117
(147
)
—
(342
)
Change, net of taxes
$
127
$
(267
)
$
123
$
(176
)
$
2,179
$
—
$
1,986
Balance, September 30, 2017
$
(168
)
$
(619
)
$
(437
)
$
(5,340
)
$
(23,327
)
$
—
$
(29,891
)
(1)
Primarily driven by Citigroup’s pay fixed/receive floating interest rate swap programs that hedge the floating rates on liabilities.
(2)
Primarily reflects adjustments based on the quarterly actuarial valuations of the Company’s significant pension and postretirement plans, annual actuarial valuations of all other plans and amortization of amounts previously recognized in other comprehensive income.
(3)
Primarily reflects the movements in (by order of impact) the Indian rupee, Chinese yuan renminbi, Turkish lira and Brazilian real against the U.S. dollar and changes in related tax effects and hedges for the three months ended
September 30, 2018
. Primarily reflects the movements in (by order of impact) the Brazilian real, Indian rupee, Australian dollar, and Argentine peso against the U.S. dollar and changes in related tax effects and hedges for the nine months ended September 30, 2018. Primarily reflects the movements in (by order of impact) the Euro, British pound, Chilean peso and Brazilian real against the U.S. dollar and changes in related tax effects and hedges for the three months ended September 30, 2017. Primarily reflects the movements in (by order of impact) the Mexican peso, Euro, Korean won and Polish zloty against the U.S. dollar and changes in related tax effects and hedges for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. Amounts recorded in the CTA component of AOCI remain in AOCI until the sale or substantial liquidation of the foreign entity, at which point such amounts related to the foreign entity are reclassified into earnings.
(4)
Beginning in the first quarter of 2018, changes in the excluded component of fair value hedges are reflected as a component of AOCI, pursuant to the early adoption of ASU No. 2017-12,
Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities
. See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding this change.
(5)
Citi adopted ASU 2016-01 and ASU 2018-03 on January 1, 2018. Upon adoption, a cumulative effect adjustment was recorded from AOCI to
Retained earnings
for net unrealized gains on former AFS equity securities. For additional information, see Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(6)
In the second quarter of 2017, Citi early adopted ASU 2017-08,
Receivables—Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Subtopic 310-20): Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities.
Upon adoption, a cumulative effect adjustment was recorded to reduce
Retained earnings
, effective January 1, 2017, for the incremental amortization of cumulative fair value hedge adjustments on callable state and municipal debt securities. For additional information, see Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
142
The pretax and after-tax changes in each component of
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
were as follows:
Three Months Ended September 30, 2018
In millions of dollars
Pretax
Tax effect
(1)
After-tax
Balance, June 30, 2018
$
(44,407
)
$
6,913
$
(37,494
)
Change in net unrealized gains (losses) on AFS debt securities
(810
)
205
(605
)
Debt valuation adjustment (DVA)
(377
)
90
(287
)
Cash flow hedges
(97
)
23
(74
)
Benefit plans
55
(29
)
26
Foreign currency translation adjustment
(192
)
(29
)
(221
)
Excluded component of fair value hedges
13
(3
)
10
Change
$
(1,408
)
$
257
$
(1,151
)
Balance, September 30, 2018
$
(45,815
)
$
7,170
$
(38,645
)
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018
In millions of dollars
Pretax
Tax effect
(1)
After-tax
Balance, December 31, 2017
(1)
$
(41,228
)
$
6,560
$
(34,668
)
Adjustment to opening balance
(2)
(4
)
1
(3
)
Adjusted balance, beginning of period
$
(41,232
)
$
6,561
$
(34,671
)
Change in net unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities
(2,861
)
700
(2,161
)
Debt valuation adjustment (DVA)
208
(49
)
159
Cash flow hedges
(519
)
122
(397
)
Benefit plans
549
(134
)
415
Foreign currency translation adjustment
(1,931
)
(37
)
(1,968
)
Excluded component of fair value hedges
(29
)
7
(22
)
Change
$
(4,583
)
$
609
$
(3,974
)
Balance, September 30, 2018
$
(45,815
)
$
7,170
$
(38,645
)
(1)
Includes the impact of ASU 2018-02, which transferred amounts from AOCI to
Retained earnings
. For additional information, see Note 19 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Citi’s 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(2)
Citi adopted ASU 2016-01 and ASU 2018-03 on January 1, 2018. Upon adoption, a cumulative effect adjustment was recorded from AOCI to
Retained earnings
for net unrealized gains on former AFS equity securities. For additional information, see Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
143
Three Months Ended September 30, 2017
In millions of dollars
Pretax
Tax effect
After-tax
Balance, June 30, 2017
$
(39,106
)
$
9,207
$
(29,899
)
Change in net unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities
(107
)
41
(66
)
Debt valuation adjustment (DVA)
(195
)
72
(123
)
Cash flow hedges
12
(4
)
8
Benefit plans
(45
)
16
(29
)
Foreign currency translation adjustment
285
(67
)
218
Excluded component of fair value hedges
—
—
—
Change
$
(50
)
$
58
$
8
Balance, September 30, 2017
$
(39,156
)
$
9,265
$
(29,891
)
Nine Months Ended September 30,
2017
In millions of dollars
Pretax
Tax effect
After-tax
Balance, December 31, 2016
$
(42,035
)
$
9,654
$
(32,381
)
Adjustment to opening balance
(1)
803
(299
)
504
Adjusted balance, beginning of period
$
(41,232
)
$
9,355
$
(31,877
)
Change in net unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities
194
(67
)
127
Debt valuation adjustment (DVA)
(422
)
155
(267
)
Cash flow hedges
198
(75
)
123
Benefit plans
(266
)
90
(176
)
Foreign currency translation adjustment
2,372
(193
)
2,179
Excluded component of fair value hedges
—
—
—
Change
$
2,076
$
(90
)
$
1,986
Balance, September 30, 2017
$
(39,156
)
$
9,265
$
(29,891
)
(1)
In the second quarter of 2017, Citi early adopted ASU 2017-08
.
Upon adoption, a cumulative effect adjustment was recorded to reduce
Retained earnings
, effective January 1, 2017, for the incremental amortization of cumulative fair value hedge adjustments on callable state and municipal debt securities. See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
144
The Company recognized pretax gains (losses) related to amounts in AOCI reclassified to the Consolidated Statement of Income as follows:
Increase (decrease) in AOCI due to
amounts reclassified to
Consolidated Statement of Income
Three Months Ended September 30,
Nine Months Ended September 30,
In millions of dollars
2018
2018
Realized (gains) losses on sales of investments
$
(69
)
$
(341
)
Gross impairment losses
68
111
Subtotal, pretax
$
(1
)
$
(230
)
Tax effect
(3
)
53
Net realized (gains) losses on investments after-tax
(1)
$
(4
)
$
(177
)
Realized DVA (gains) losses on fair value option liabilities
$
9
$
46
Subtotal, pretax
$
9
$
46
Tax effect
(2
)
(10
)
Net realized debt valuation adjustment, after-tax
$
7
$
36
Interest rate contracts
$
54
$
3
Foreign exchange contracts
(2
)
(8
)
Subtotal, pretax
$
52
$
(5
)
Tax effect
(12
)
1
Amortization of cash flow hedges, after-tax
(2)
$
40
$
(4
)
Amortization of unrecognized
Prior service cost (benefit)
$
(10
)
$
(32
)
Net actuarial loss
60
193
Curtailment/settlement impact
(3)
—
6
Subtotal, pretax
$
50
$
167
Tax effect
(10
)
(40
)
Amortization of benefit plans, after-tax
(3)
$
40
$
127
Foreign currency translation adjustment
$
—
$
—
Tax effect
—
—
Foreign currency translation adjustment
$
—
$
—
Total amounts reclassified out of AOCI, pretax
$
110
$
(22
)
Total tax effect
(27
)
4
Total amounts reclassified out of AOCI, after-tax
$
83
$
(18
)
(1)
The pretax amount is reclassified to
Realized gains (losses) on sales of investments, net
and
Gross impairment losses
in the Consolidated Statement of Income. See Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details.
(2)
See Note 19 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details.
(3)
See Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details.
145
The Company recognized pretax gains (losses) related to amounts in AOCI reclassified to the Consolidated Statement of Income as follows:
Increase (decrease) in AOCI due to
amounts reclassified to
Consolidated Statement of Income
Three Months Ended September 30,
Nine Months Ended September 30,
In millions of dollars
2017
2017
Realized (gains) losses on sales of investments
$
(213
)
$
(626
)
OTTI gross impairment losses
15
47
Subtotal, pretax
$
(198
)
$
(579
)
Tax effect
72
211
Net realized (gains) losses on investment securities, after-tax
(1)
$
(126
)
$
(368
)
Realized DVA (gains) losses on fair value option liabilities
$
3
$
(13
)
Subtotal, pretax
$
3
$
(13
)
Tax effect
$
(1
)
$
5
Net realized debt valuation adjustment, after-tax
$
2
$
(8
)
Interest rate contracts
$
48
$
94
Foreign exchange contracts
7
8
Subtotal, pretax
$
55
$
102
Tax effect
(20
)
(38
)
Amortization of cash flow hedges, after-tax
(2)
$
35
$
64
Amortization of unrecognized
Prior service cost (benefit)
$
(10
)
$
(32
)
Net actuarial loss
70
203
Curtailment/settlement impact
(3)
5
12
Subtotal, pretax
$
65
$
183
Tax effect
(23
)
(66
)
Amortization of benefit plans, after-tax
(3)
$
42
$
117
Foreign currency translation adjustment
$
—
$
(232
)
Tax effect
—
85
Foreign currency translation adjustment
$
—
$
(147
)
Total amounts reclassified out of AOCI, pretax
$
(75
)
$
(539
)
Total tax effect
28
197
Total amounts reclassified out of AOCI, after-tax
$
(47
)
$
(342
)
(1)
The pretax amount is reclassified to
Realized gains (losses) on sales of investments, net
and
Gross impairment losses
on the Consolidated Statement of Income. See Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details.
(2)
See Note 19 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details.
(3)
See Note
8
to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details.
146
18. SECURITIZATIONS AND VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES
For additional information regarding Citi’s use of special purpose entities (SPEs) and variable interest entities (VIEs), see Note 21 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Citi’s
2017
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Citigroup’s involvement with consolidated and unconsolidated VIEs with which the Company holds significant variable interests or has continuing involvement through servicing a majority of the assets in a VIE is presented below:
As of September 30, 2018
Maximum exposure to loss in significant unconsolidated VIEs
(1)
Funded exposures
(2)
Unfunded exposures
In millions of dollars
Total
involvement
with SPE
assets
Consolidated
VIE/SPE assets
Significant
unconsolidated
VIE assets
(3)
Debt
investments
Equity
investments
Funding
commitments
Guarantees
and
derivatives
Total
Credit card securitizations
$
45,319
$
45,319
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
Mortgage securitizations
(4)
U.S. agency-sponsored
113,565
—
113,565
2,965
—
—
68
3,033
Non-agency-sponsored
25,452
1,580
23,872
356
—
—
1
357
Citi-administered asset-backed commercial paper conduits (ABCP)
17,435
17,435
—
—
—
—
—
—
Collateralized loan obligations (CLOs)
17,870
—
17,870
5,524
—
—
9
5,533
Asset-based financing
64,817
639
64,178
20,060
601
9,214
—
29,875
Municipal securities tender option bond trusts (TOBs)
8,016
2,029
5,987
37
—
4,106
—
4,143
Municipal investments
17,765
1
17,764
2,622
3,798
2,268
—
8,688
Client intermediation
592
419
173
72
—
—
9
81
Investment funds
1,353
525
828
12
—
3
5
20
Other
652
31
621
39
8
22
46
115
Total
$
312,836
$
67,978
$
244,858
$
31,687
$
4,407
$
15,613
$
138
$
51,845
As of December 31, 2017
Maximum exposure to loss in significant unconsolidated VIEs
(1)
Funded exposures
(2)
Unfunded exposures
In millions of dollars
Total
involvement
with SPE
assets
Consolidated
VIE/SPE assets
Significant
unconsolidated
VIE assets
(3)
Debt
investments
Equity
investments
Funding
commitments
Guarantees
and
derivatives
Total
Credit card securitizations
$
50,795
$
50,795
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
Mortgage securitizations
(4)
U.S. agency-sponsored
116,610
—
116,610
2,647
—
—
74
2,721
Non-agency-sponsored
22,251
2,035
20,216
330
—
—
1
331
Citi-administered asset-backed commercial paper conduits (ABCP)
19,282
19,282
—
—
—
—
—
—
Collateralized loan obligations (CLOs)
20,588
—
20,588
5,956
—
—
9
5,965
Asset-based financing
60,472
633
59,839
19,478
583
5,878
—
25,939
Municipal securities tender option bond trusts (TOBs)
6,925
2,166
4,759
138
—
3,035
—
3,173
Municipal investments
19,119
7
19,112
2,709
3,640
2,344
—
8,693
Client intermediation
958
824
134
32
—
—
9
41
Investment funds
1,892
616
1,276
14
7
13
—
34
Other
677
36
641
27
9
34
47
117
Total
$
319,569
$
76,394
$
243,175
$
31,331
$
4,239
$
11,304
$
140
$
47,014
(1) The definition of maximum exposure to loss is included in the text that follows this table.
(2)
Included on Citigroup’s
September 30, 2018
and
December 31, 2017
Consolidated Balance Sheet.
(3)
A significant unconsolidated VIE is an entity in which the Company has any variable interest or continuing involvement considered to be significant, regardless of the likelihood of loss.
(4)
Citigroup mortgage securitizations also include agency and non-agency (private-label) re-securitization activities. These SPEs are not consolidated. See “Re-securitizations” below for further discussion.
147
The previous tables do not include:
•
certain venture capital investments made by some of the Company’s private equity subsidiaries, as the Company accounts for these investments in accordance with the Investment Company Audit Guide (codified in ASC 946);
•
certain investment funds for which the Company provides investment management services and personal estate trusts for which the Company provides administrative, trustee and/or investment management services;
•
certain VIEs structured by third parties in which the Company holds securities in inventory, as these investments are made on arm’s-length terms;
•
certain positions in mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities held by the Company, which are classified as
Trading account assets
or
Investments
, in which the Company has no other involvement with the related securitization entity deemed to be significant (for more information on these positions, see Notes 12 and 20 to the Consolidated Financial Statements);
•
certain representations and warranties exposures in legacy
ICG
-sponsored mortgage-backed and asset-backed securitizations in which the Company has no variable interest or continuing involvement as servicer. The outstanding balance of mortgage loans securitized during 2005 to 2008 in which the Company has no variable interest or continuing involvement as servicer was approximately
$8 billion
and
$9 billion
at
September 30, 2018
and
December 31, 2017
, respectively;
•
certain representations and warranties exposures in Citigroup residential mortgage securitizations, where the original mortgage loan balances are no longer outstanding; and
•
VIEs such as trust preferred securities trusts used in connection with the Company’s funding activities. The Company does not have a variable interest in these trusts.
The asset balances for consolidated VIEs represent the carrying amounts of the assets consolidated by the Company. The carrying amount may represent the amortized cost or the current fair value of the assets depending on the legal form of the asset (e.g., loan or security) and the Company’s standard accounting policies for the asset type and line of business.
The asset balances for unconsolidated VIEs in which the Company has significant involvement represent the most current information available to the Company. In most cases, the asset balances represent an amortized cost basis without regard to impairments, unless fair value information is readily available to the Company.
The maximum funded exposure represents the balance sheet carrying amount of the Company’s investment in the VIE. It reflects the initial amount of cash invested in the VIE, adjusted for any accrued interest and cash principal payments received. The carrying amount may also be adjusted for increases or declines in fair value or any impairment in value recognized in earnings. The maximum exposure of unfunded positions represents the remaining undrawn committed amount, including liquidity and credit facilities provided by the Company or the notional amount of a derivative instrument considered to be a variable interest. In certain transactions, the Company has entered into derivative instruments or other arrangements that are not considered variable interests in the VIE (e.g., interest rate swaps, cross-currency swaps or where the Company is the purchaser of credit protection under a credit default swap or total return swap where the Company pays the total return on certain assets to the SPE). Receivables under such arrangements are not included in the maximum exposure amounts.
148
Funding Commitments for Significant Unconsolidated VIEs—Liquidity Facilities and Loan Commitments
The following table presents the notional amount of liquidity facilities and loan commitments that are classified as funding commitments in the VIE tables above:
September 30, 2018
December 31, 2017
In millions of dollars
Liquidity
facilities
Loan/equity
commitments
Liquidity
facilities
Loan/equity
commitments
Asset-based financing
$
—
$
9,214
$
—
$
5,878
Municipal securities tender option bond trusts (TOBs)
4,106
—
3,035
—
Municipal investments
—
2,268
—
2,344
Investment funds
—
3
—
13
Other
—
22
—
34
Total funding commitments
$
4,106
$
11,507
$
3,035
$
8,269
Significant Interests in Unconsolidated VIEs—Balance Sheet Classification
The following table presents the carrying amounts and classification of significant variable interests in unconsolidated VIEs:
In billions of dollars
September 30, 2018
December 31, 2017
Cash
$
—
$
—
Trading account assets
8.2
8.5
Investments
4.7
4.4
Total loans, net of allowance
22.7
22.2
Other
0.5
0.5
Total assets
$
36.1
$
35.6
Credit Card Securitizations
Substantially all of the Company’s credit card securitization activity is through
two
trusts—Citibank Credit Card Master Trust (Master Trust) and Citibank Omni Master Trust (Omni
Trust), with the substantial majority through the Master Trust. These trusts are consolidated entities.
The following table reflects amounts related to the Company’s securitized credit card receivables:
In billions of dollars
September 30, 2018
December 31, 2017
Ownership interests in principal amount of trust credit card receivables
Sold to investors via trust-issued securities
$
26.3
$
28.8
Retained by Citigroup as trust-issued securities
7.5
7.6
Retained by Citigroup via non-certificated interests
11.6
14.4
Total
$
45.4
$
50.8
The following tables summarize selected cash flow information related to Citigroup’s credit card securitizations:
Three Months Ended September 30,
In billions of dollars
2018
2017
Proceeds from new securitizations
$
1.9
$
2.2
Pay down of maturing notes
(2.9
)
(1.8
)
Nine Months Ended September 30,
In billions of dollars
2018
2017
Proceeds from new securitizations
$
5.8
$
9.8
Pay down of maturing notes
(8.3
)
(4.6
)
Master Trust Liabilities (at Par Value)
The weighted average maturity of the third-party term notes issued by the Master Trust was
3.0 years
as of
September 30, 2018
and
2.6 years
as of
December 31, 2017
.
In billions of dollars
Sept. 30, 2018
Dec. 31, 2017
Term notes issued to third parties
$
24.8
$
27.8
Term notes retained by Citigroup affiliates
5.7
5.7
Total Master Trust liabilities
$
30.5
$
33.5
Omni Trust Liabilities (at Par Value)
The weighted average maturity of the third-party term notes issued by the Omni Trust was
1.7 years
as of
September 30, 2018
and
1.9 years
as of
December 31, 2017
.
In billions of dollars
Sept. 30, 2018
Dec. 31, 2017
Term notes issued to third parties
$
1.5
$
1.0
Term notes retained by Citigroup affiliates
1.9
1.9
Total Omni Trust liabilities
$
3.4
$
2.9
149
Mortgage Securitizations
The following tables summarize selected cash flow information and retained interests related to Citigroup mortgage securitizations:
Three Months Ended September 30,
2018
2017
In billions of dollars
U.S. agency-
sponsored
mortgages
Non-agency-
sponsored
mortgages
U.S. agency-
sponsored
mortgages
Non-agency-
sponsored
mortgages
Proceeds from new securitizations
$
7.9
$
2.1
$
11.7
$
4.1
Contractual servicing fees received
—
—
0.1
—
Nine Months Ended September 30,
2018
2017
In billions of dollars
U.S. agency-
sponsored
mortgages
Non-agency-
sponsored
mortgages
U.S. agency-
sponsored
mortgages
Non-agency-
sponsored
mortgages
Proceeds from new securitizations
$
23.7
$
8.2
$
26.2
$
6.9
Contractual servicing fees received
0.1
—
0.2
—
Gains recognized on the securitization of U.S. agency-sponsored mortgages were
$6 million
and
$18 million
for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2018
, respectively. For the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2018
, gains recognized on the securitization of non-agency-sponsored mortgages were
$5 million
and
$40 million
, respectively.
Gains recognized on the securitization of U.S. agency-sponsored mortgages were
$14 million
and
$61 million
for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2017
, respectively. For the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2017
, gains recognized on the securitization of non-agency-sponsored mortgages were
$29 million
and
$75 million
, respectively.
September 30, 2018
December 31, 2017
Non-agency-sponsored mortgages
(1)
Non-agency-sponsored mortgages
(1)
In millions of dollars
U.S. agency-
sponsored mortgages
Senior
interests
Subordinated
interests
U.S. agency-
sponsored mortgages
Senior
interests
Subordinated
interests
Carrying value of retained interests
$
2,092
$
296
$
112
$
1,634
$
214
$
139
(1)
Disclosure of non-agency-sponsored mortgages as senior and subordinated interests is indicative of the interests’ position in the capital structure of the securitization.
Key assumptions used in measuring the fair value of retained interests at the date of sale or securitization of mortgage receivables were as follows:
Three Months Ended September 30, 2018
Non-agency-sponsored mortgages
(1)
U.S. agency-
sponsored mortgages
Senior
interests
Subordinated
interests
Discount rate
3.0% to 10.4%
3.8% to 4.2%
4.1% to 8.6%
Weighted average discount rate
6.9
%
4.1
%
5.6
%
Constant prepayment rate
5.3% to 12.8%
7.0% to 10.0%
7.0% to 10.0%
Weighted average constant prepayment rate
8.1
%
7.9
%
8.2
%
Anticipated net credit losses
(2)
NM
3.4% to 3.7%
3.4% to 3.7%
Weighted average anticipated net credit losses
NM
3.6
%
3.6
%
Weighted average life
6.9 to 22.1 years
3.0 to 3.9 years
7.3 to 15.7 years
150
Three Months Ended September 30, 2017
Non-agency-sponsored mortgages
(1)
U.S. agency-
sponsored mortgages
Senior
interests
Subordinated
interests
Discount rate
2.0% to 13.2%
1.4% to 4.5%
1.7% to 4.2%
Weighted average discount rate
8.5
%
2.8
%
3.5
%
Constant prepayment rate
6.6% to 31.6%
—
—
Weighted average constant prepayment rate
10.6
%
—
—
Anticipated net credit losses
(2)
NM
6.7% to 6.8%
6.4
%
Weighted average anticipated net credit losses
NM
6.7
6.4
%
Weighted average life
2.5 to 10.5 years
4.9 to 9.4 years
5.0 to 9.1 years
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018
Non-agency-sponsored mortgages
(1)
U.S. agency-
sponsored mortgages
Senior
interests
Subordinated
interests
Discount rate
3.0% to 11.4%
1.6% to 4.5%
3.0% to 8.6%
Weighted average discount rate
6.3
%
3.6
%
4.4
%
Constant prepayment rate
3.5% to 16.0%
7.0% to 12.0%
7.0% to 12.0%
Weighted average constant prepayment rate
8.2
%
8.8
%
9.1
%
Anticipated net credit losses
(2)
NM
2.0% to 6.7%
2.0% to 4.6%
Weighted average anticipated net credit losses
NM
4.4
%
3.4
%
Weighted average life
5.0 to 22.1 years
2.5 to 9.9 years
2.5 to 15.7 years
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017
Non-agency-sponsored mortgages
(1)
U.S. agency-
sponsored mortgages
Senior
interests
Subordinated
interests
Discount rate
2.0% to 19.9%
1.4% to 4.5%
1.7% to 19.1%
Weighted average discount rate
9.1
%
2.8
%
4.0
%
Constant prepayment rate
3.8% to 31.6%
—
—
Weighted average constant prepayment rate
9.6
%
—
—
Anticipated net credit losses
(2)
NM
6.7% to 6.8%
6.4% to 69.1%
Weighted average anticipated net credit losses
NM
6.7
%
10.8
%
Weighted average life
2.5 to 14.5 years
4.9 to 10.0 years
5.0 to 10.0 years
(1)
Disclosure of non-agency-sponsored mortgages as senior and subordinated interests is indicative of the interests’ position in the capital structure of the securitization.
(2)
Anticipated net credit losses represent estimated loss severity associated with defaulted mortgage loans underlying the mortgage securitizations disclosed above. Anticipated net credit losses, in this instance, do not represent total credit losses incurred to date, nor do they represent credit losses expected on retained interests in mortgage securitizations.
NM
Anticipated net credit losses are not meaningful due to U.S. agency guarantees.
The interests retained by the Company range from highly rated and/or senior in the capital structure to unrated and/or residual interests.
The key assumptions used to value retained interests, and the sensitivity of the fair value to adverse changes of
10%
and
20%
in each of the key assumptions, are set forth in the tables
below. The negative effect of each change is calculated independently, holding all other assumptions constant. Because the key assumptions may not be independent, the net effect of simultaneous adverse changes in the key assumptions may be less than the sum of the individual effects shown below.
151
September 30, 2018
Non-agency-sponsored mortgages
(1)
U.S. agency-
sponsored mortgages
Senior
interests
Subordinated
interests
Discount rate
2.6% to 55.0%
12.2
%
4.9% to 5.8%
Weighted average discount rate
6.0
%
12.2
%
5.2
%
Constant prepayment rate
3.7% to 19.6%
8.0
%
5.0% to 16.0%
Weighted average constant prepayment rate
8.8
%
8.0
%
7.7
%
Anticipated net credit losses
(2)
NM
38.0
%
37.0% to 91.0%
Weighted average anticipated net credit losses
NM
38.0
%
49.7
%
Weighted average life
0.5 to 28.2 years
7.6 years
6.2 to 15.5 years
December 31, 2017
Non-agency-sponsored mortgages
(1)
U.S. agency-
sponsored mortgages
Senior
interests
Subordinated
interests
Discount rate
1.8% to 84.2%
5.8% to 100.0%
2.8% to 35.1%
Weighted average discount rate
7.1
%
5.8
%
9.0
%
Constant prepayment rate
6.9% to 27.8%
8.9% to 15.5%
8.6% to 13.1%
Weighted average constant prepayment rate
11.6
%
8.9
%
10.6
%
Anticipated net credit losses
(2)
NM
0.4% to 46.9%
35.1% to 52.1%
Weighted average anticipated net credit losses
NM
46.9
%
44.9
%
Weighted average life
0.1 to 27.8 years
4.8 to 5.3 years
0.2 to 18.6 years
(1)
Disclosure of non-agency-sponsored mortgages as senior and subordinated interests is indicative of the interests’ position in the capital structure of the securitization.
(2)
Anticipated net credit losses represent estimated loss severity associated with defaulted mortgage loans underlying the mortgage securitizations disclosed above. Anticipated net credit losses, in this instance, do not represent total credit losses incurred to date, nor do they represent credit losses expected on retained interests in mortgage securitizations.
NM
Anticipated net credit losses are not meaningful due to U.S. agency guarantees.
September 30, 2018
Non-agency-sponsored mortgages
In millions of dollars
U.S. agency-
sponsored mortgages
Senior
interests
Subordinated
interests
Discount rates
Adverse change of 10%
$
(61
)
$
—
$
(1
)
Adverse change of 20%
(119
)
—
(2
)
Constant prepayment rate
Adverse change of 10%
(32
)
—
—
Adverse change of 20%
(63
)
—
—
Anticipated net credit losses
Adverse change of 10%
NM
—
—
Adverse change of 20%
NM
—
—
152
December 31, 2017
Non-agency-sponsored mortgages
In millions of dollars
U.S. agency-
sponsored mortgages
Senior
interests
Subordinated
interests
Discount rates
Adverse change of 10%
$
(44
)
$
(2
)
$
(3
)
Adverse change of 20%
(85
)
(4
)
(5
)
Constant prepayment rate
Adverse change of 10%
(41
)
(1
)
(1
)
Adverse change of 20%
(84
)
(1
)
(2
)
Anticipated net credit losses
Adverse change of 10%
NM
(3
)
—
Adverse change of 20%
NM
(7
)
—
NM
Anticipated net credit losses are not meaningful due to U.S. agency guarantees.
Mortgage Servicing Rights (MSRs)
The fair value of Citi’s capitalized MSRs was
$618 million
and
$553 million
at
September 30, 2018
and
2017
, respectively. The MSRs correspond to principal loan balances of
$62 billion
and
$68 billion
as of
September 30, 2018
and
2017
, respectively. The following tables summarize the changes in capitalized MSRs:
Three Months Ended September 30,
In millions of dollars
2018
2017
Balance, as of June 30
$
596
$
560
Originations
14
19
Changes in fair value of MSRs due to changes in inputs and assumptions
25
(6
)
Other changes
(1)
(17
)
(20
)
Sale of MSRs
—
—
Balance, as of September 30
$
618
$
553
Nine Months Ended September 30,
In millions of dollars
2018
2017
Balance, beginning of year
$
558
$
1,564
Originations
46
75
Changes in fair value of MSRs due to changes in inputs and assumptions
82
50
Other changes
(1)
(50
)
(90
)
Sale of MSRs
(2)
(18
)
(1,046
)
Balance, as of September 30
$
618
$
553
(1)
Represents changes due to customer payments and passage of time.
(2)
See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Citi’s 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information on the exit of the U.S. mortgage servicing operations and sale of MSRs in
2017
.
The Company receives fees during the course of servicing previously securitized mortgages. The amounts of these fees were as follows:
Three Months Ended September 30,
Nine Months Ended September 30,
In millions of dollars
2018
2017
2018
2017
Servicing fees
$
41
$
65
$
130
$
236
Late fees
1
2
3
8
Ancillary fees
1
3
7
11
Total MSR fees
$
43
$
70
$
140
$
255
In the Consolidated Statement of Income these fees are primarily classified as
Commissions and fees
, and changes in MSR fair values are classified as
Other revenue
.
153
Re-securitizations
The Company engages in re-securitization transactions in which debt securities are transferred to a VIE in exchange for new beneficial interests. Citi did not transfer non-agency (private-label) securities to re-securitization entities during the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2018
and
2017
. These securities are backed by either residential or commercial mortgages and are often structured on behalf of clients.
As of
September 30, 2018
, the fair value of Citi-retained interests in private-label re-securitization transactions structured by Citi totaled approximately
$33 million
(all related to re-securitization transactions executed prior to 2016), which has been recorded in
Trading account assets
. Of this amount, substantially all was related to subordinated beneficial interests. As of
December 31, 2017
, the fair value of Citi-retained interests in private-label re-securitization transactions structured by Citi totaled approximately
$79 million
(all related to re-securitization transactions executed prior to 2016). Of this amount, substantially all was related to subordinated beneficial interests. The original par value of private-label re-securitization transactions in which Citi holds a retained interest as of
September 30, 2018
and
December 31, 2017
was approximately
$316 million
and
$887 million
, respectively.
The Company also re-securitizes U.S. government-agency guaranteed mortgage-backed (agency) securities. During the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2018
, Citi transferred agency securities with a fair value of approximately
$6.8 billion
and
$20.4 billion
, respectively, to re-securitization entities compared to approximately
$9.9 billion
and
$20.0 billion
for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2017
, respectively.
As of
September 30, 2018
, the fair value of Citi-retained interests in agency re-securitization transactions structured by Citi totaled approximately
$2.4 billion
(including
$1.3 billion
related to re-securitization transactions executed in
2018
) compared to
$2.1 billion
as of
December 31, 2017
(including
$854 million
related to re-securitization transactions executed in
2017
), which is recorded in
Trading account assets
. The original fair value of agency re-securitization transactions in which Citi holds a retained interest as of
September 30, 2018
and
December 31, 2017
was approximately
$67.2 billion
and
$68.3 billion
, respectively.
As of
September 30, 2018
and
December 31, 2017
, the Company did not consolidate any private-label or agency re-securitization entities.
Citi-Administered Asset-Backed Commercial Paper Conduits
At
September 30, 2018
and
December 31, 2017
, the commercial paper conduits administered by Citi had approximately
$17.4 billion
and
$19.3 billion
of purchased assets outstanding, respectively, and had incremental funding commitments with clients of approximately
$16.3 billion
and
$14.5 billion
, respectively.
Substantially all of the funding of the conduits is in the form of short-term commercial paper. At
September 30, 2018
and
December 31, 2017
, the weighted average remaining lives of the commercial paper issued by the conduits were approximately
55
and
51 days
, respectively.
The primary credit enhancement provided to the conduit investors is in the form of transaction-specific credit enhancements described above. In addition to the transaction-specific credit enhancements, the conduits, other than the government guaranteed loan conduit, have obtained a letter of credit from the Company, which is equal to at least
8%
to
10%
of the conduit’s assets with a minimum of
$200 million
. The letters of credit provided by the Company to the conduits total approximately
$1.6 billion
as of
September 30, 2018
and
December 31, 2017
. The net result across multi-seller conduits administered by the Company is that, in the event defaulted assets exceed the transaction-specific credit enhancements described above, any losses in each conduit are allocated first to the Company and then to the commercial paper investors.
At
September 30, 2018
and
December 31, 2017
, the Company owned
$5.4 billion
and
$9.3 billion
, respectively, of the commercial paper issued by its administered conduits. The Company's investments were not driven by market illiquidity and the Company is not obligated under any agreement to purchase the commercial paper issued by the conduits.
Collateralized Loan Obligations
The following tables summarize selected cash flow information and retained interests related to Citigroup CLOs:
Three Months Ended September 30,
In billions of dollars
2018
2017
Proceeds from new securitizations
$
0.4
$
1.1
Nine Months Ended September 30,
In billions of dollars
2018
2017
Proceeds from new securitizations
$
4.0
$
2.5
Cash flows received on retained interests and other cash flows
0.1
0.1
In millions of dollars
Sept. 30, 2018
Dec. 31, 2017
Carrying value of retained interests
$
3,461
$
4,079
154
Asset-Based Financing
The primary types of Citi’s asset-based financings, total assets of the unconsolidated VIEs with significant involvement and Citi’s maximum exposure to loss are shown below. For Citi to realize the maximum loss, the VIE (borrower) would have to default with no recovery from the assets held by the VIE.
September 30, 2018
In millions of dollars
Total
unconsolidated
VIE assets
Maximum
exposure to
unconsolidated VIEs
Type
Commercial and other real estate
$
18,098
$
6,949
Corporate loans
6,815
5,764
Hedge funds and equities
416
54
Airplanes, ships and other assets
38,849
17,108
Total
$
64,178
$
29,875
December 31, 2017
In millions of dollars
Total
unconsolidated
VIE assets
Maximum
exposure to
unconsolidated VIEs
Type
Commercial and other real estate
$
15,370
$
5,445
Corporate loans
4,725
3,587
Hedge funds and equities
542
58
Airplanes, ships and other assets
39,202
16,849
Total
$
59,839
$
25,939
Municipal Securities Tender Option Bond (TOB) Trusts
At
September 30, 2018
and
December 31, 2017
, none of the municipal bonds owned by non-customer TOB trusts were subject to a credit guarantee provided by the Company.
At
September 30, 2018
and
December 31, 2017
, liquidity agreements provided with respect to customer TOB trusts totaled
$4.1 billion
and
$3.2 billion
, respectively, of which
$2.2 billion
and
$2.0 billion
, respectively, were offset by reimbursement agreements. For the remaining exposure related to TOB transactions, where the residual owned by the customer was at least
25%
of the bond value at the inception of the transaction, no reimbursement agreement was executed.
The Company also provides other liquidity agreements or letters of credit to customer-sponsored municipal investment funds, which are not variable interest entities, and municipality-related issuers that totaled
$6.1 billion
as of
September 30, 2018
and
December 31, 2017
. These liquidity agreements and letters of credit are offset by reimbursement agreements with various term-out provisions.
Client Intermediation
The proceeds from new securitizations related to the Company’s client intermediation transactions for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2018
totaled approximately
$0.2 billion
and
$0.7 billion
, respectively, compared to
$0.2 billion
and
$0.9 billion
for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2017
, respectively.
155
19. DERIVATIVES ACTIVITIES
As of January 1, 2018, Citigroup early adopted ASU 2017-12,
Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedge Activities
. This standard primarily impacts Citi’s accounting for derivatives designated as cash flow hedges and fair value hedges. Refer to the respective sections below for details.
In the ordinary course of business, Citigroup enters into various types of derivative transactions. All derivatives are recorded in
Trading account assets/Trading account liabilities
on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. For additional information regarding Citi’s use of and accounting for derivatives, see Note 22 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Citi’s
2017
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Information pertaining to Citigroup’s derivative activities, based on notional amounts, is presented in the table below. Derivative notional amounts are reference amounts from which contractual payments are derived and do not represent a complete measure of Citi’s exposure to derivative transactions. Rather, Citi’s derivative exposure arises primarily from market fluctuations (i.e., market risk), counterparty failure (i.e., credit risk) and/or periods of high volatility or financial stress (i.e., liquidity risk), as well as any market valuation adjustments that may be required on the transactions. Moreover, notional amounts do not reflect the netting of offsetting trades. For example, if Citi enters into a receive-fixed interest rate swap with
$100 million
notional, and offsets this risk with an identical but opposite pay-fixed position with a different counterparty,
$200 million
in derivative notionals is reported, although these offsetting positions may result in de minimis overall market risk. In addition, aggregate derivative notional amounts can fluctuate from period to period in the normal course of business based on Citi’s market share, levels of client activity and other factors.
156
Derivative Notionals
Hedging instruments under
ASC 815
Trading derivative instruments
In millions of dollars
September 30,
2018
December 31,
2017
September 30,
2018
December 31,
2017
Interest rate contracts
Swaps
$
246,079
$
189,779
$
19,759,439
$
18,754,219
Futures and forwards
—
—
8,297,965
6,460,539
Written options
—
—
3,857,773
3,516,131
Purchased options
—
—
3,236,924
3,234,025
Total interest rate contract notionals
$
246,079
$
189,779
$
35,152,101
$
31,964,914
Foreign exchange contracts
Swaps
$
54,502
$
37,162
$
7,004,521
$
5,576,357
Futures, forwards and spot
37,769
33,103
5,711,577
3,097,700
Written options
2,497
3,951
1,727,916
1,127,728
Purchased options
2,934
6,427
1,695,392
1,148,686
Total foreign exchange contract notionals
$
97,702
$
80,643
$
16,139,406
$
10,950,471
Equity contracts
Swaps
$
—
$
—
$
245,167
$
215,834
Futures and forwards
—
—
70,526
72,616
Written options
—
—
436,032
389,961
Purchased options
—
—
333,448
328,154
Total equity contract notionals
$
—
$
—
$
1,085,173
$
1,006,565
Commodity and other contracts
Swaps
$
—
$
—
$
118,699
$
82,039
Futures and forwards
397
23
164,427
153,248
Written options
—
—
72,021
62,045
Purchased options
—
—
69,862
60,526
Total commodity and other contract notionals
$
397
$
23
$
425,009
$
357,858
Credit derivatives
(1)
Protection sold
$
—
$
—
$
723,060
$
735,142
Protection purchased
—
—
793,792
777,713
Total credit derivatives
$
—
$
—
$
1,516,852
$
1,512,855
Total derivative notionals
$
344,178
$
270,445
$
54,318,541
$
45,792,663
(1)
Credit derivatives are arrangements designed to allow one party (protection buyer) to transfer the credit risk of a “reference asset” to another party (protection seller). These arrangements allow a protection seller to assume the credit risk associated with the reference asset without directly purchasing that asset. The Company enters into credit derivative positions for purposes such as risk management, yield enhancement, reduction of credit concentrations and diversification of overall risk.
157
The following tables present the gross and net fair values of the Company’s derivative transactions and the related offsetting amounts as of
September 30, 2018
and
December 31, 2017
. Gross positive fair values are offset against gross negative fair values by counterparty, pursuant to enforceable master netting agreements. Under ASC 815-10-45, payables and receivables in respect of cash collateral received from or paid to a given counterparty pursuant to a credit support annex are included in the offsetting amount, if a legal opinion supporting the enforceability of netting and collateral rights has been obtained. GAAP does not permit similar offsetting for security collateral.
In addition, the following tables reflect rule changes adopted by clearing organizations that require or allow entities to treat certain derivative assets, liabilities and the related variation margin as settlement of the related derivative fair values for legal and accounting purposes, as opposed to presenting gross derivative assets and liabilities that are subject to collateral, whereby the counterparties would record a related collateral payable or receivable. As a result, the tables reflect a reduction of approximately
$110 billion
and
$100 billion
as of
September 30, 2018
and
December 31, 2017
, respectively, of derivative assets and derivative liabilities that previously would have been reported on a gross basis, but are now settled and not subject to collateral. The tables also present amounts that are not permitted to be offset, such as security collateral or cash collateral posted at third-party custodians, but which would be eligible for offsetting to the extent that an event of default occurred and a legal opinion supporting enforceability of the netting and collateral rights has been obtained.
158
Derivative Mark-to-Market (MTM) Receivables/Payables
In millions of dollars at September 30, 2018
Derivatives classified in
Trading account assets/liabilities
(1)(2)
Derivatives instruments designated as ASC 815 hedges
Assets
Liabilities
Over-the-counter
$
1,411
$
81
Cleared
137
575
Interest rate contracts
$
1,548
$
656
Over-the-counter
$
1,568
$
718
Foreign exchange contracts
$
1,568
$
718
Total derivatives instruments designated as ASC 815 hedges
$
3,116
$
1,374
Derivatives instruments not designated as ASC 815 hedges
Over-the-counter
$
155,901
$
136,989
Cleared
8,262
10,062
Exchange traded
130
136
Interest rate contracts
$
164,293
$
147,187
Over-the-counter
$
169,989
$
164,571
Cleared
3,326
3,360
Exchange traded
88
236
Foreign exchange contracts
$
173,403
$
168,167
Over-the-counter
$
19,891
$
24,766
Cleared
10
9
Exchange traded
10,143
10,354
Equity contracts
$
30,044
$
35,129
Over-the-counter
$
22,449
$
25,024
Exchange traded
826
756
Commodity and other contracts
$
23,275
$
25,780
Over-the-counter
$
4,240
$
5,912
Cleared
7,326
5,781
Credit derivatives
$
11,566
$
11,693
Total derivatives instruments not designated as ASC 815 hedges
$
402,581
$
387,956
Total derivatives
$
405,697
$
389,330
Cash collateral paid/received
(3)
$
10,759
$
13,676
Less: Netting agreements
(4)
(322,565
)
(322,565
)
Less: Netting cash collateral received/paid
(5)
(37,678
)
(30,701
)
Net receivables/payables included on the Consolidated Balance Sheet
(6)
$
56,213
$
49,740
Additional amounts subject to an enforceable master netting agreement, but not offset on the Consolidated Balance Sheet
Less: Cash collateral received/paid
$
(739
)
$
(83
)
Less: Non-cash collateral received/paid
(12,389
)
(11,376
)
Total net receivables/payables
(6)
$
43,085
$
38,281
(1)
The derivatives fair values are also presented in Note 20 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(2)
Over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives are derivatives executed and settled bilaterally with counterparties without the use of an organized exchange or central clearing house. Cleared derivatives include derivatives executed bilaterally with a counterparty in the OTC market, but then novated to a central clearing house, whereby the central clearing house becomes the counterparty to both of the original counterparties. Exchange-traded derivatives include derivatives executed directly on an organized exchange that provides pre-trade price transparency.
(3)
Reflects the net amount of the
$41,460 million
and
$51,354 million
of gross cash collateral paid and received, respectively. Of the gross cash collateral paid,
$30,701 million
was used to offset trading derivative liabilities and, of the gross cash collateral received,
$37,678 million
was used to offset trading derivative assets.
(4)
Represents the netting of derivative receivable and payable balances with the same counterparty under enforceable netting agreements. Approximately
$304 billion
,
$9 billion
and
$10 billion
of the netting against trading account asset/liability balances is attributable to each of the OTC, cleared and exchange-traded derivatives, respectively.
(5)
Represents the netting of cash collateral paid and received by counterparty under enforceable credit support agreements. Substantially all cash collateral received and paid is netted against OTC derivative assets and liabilities, respectively.
159
(6)
The net receivables/payables include approximately
$6 billion
of derivative asset and
$7 billion
of derivative liability fair values not subject to enforceable master netting agreements, respectively.
In millions of dollars at December 31, 2017
Derivatives classified in
Trading account assets/liabilities
(1)(2)
Derivatives instruments designated as ASC 815 hedges
Assets
Liabilities
Over-the-counter
$
1,969
$
134
Cleared
110
92
Interest rate contracts
$
2,079
$
226
Over-the-counter
$
1,143
$
1,150
Foreign exchange contracts
$
1,143
$
1,150
Total derivatives instruments designated as ASC 815 hedges
$
3,222
$
1,376
Derivatives instruments not designated as ASC 815 hedges
Over-the-counter
$
195,677
$
173,937
Cleared
7,129
10,381
Exchange traded
102
95
Interest rate contracts
$
202,908
$
184,413
Over-the-counter
$
119,092
$
117,473
Cleared
1,690
2,028
Exchange traded
34
121
Foreign exchange contracts
$
120,816
$
119,622
Over-the-counter
$
17,221
$
21,201
Cleared
21
25
Exchange traded
9,736
10,147
Equity contracts
$
26,978
$
31,373
Over-the-counter
$
13,499
$
16,362
Exchange traded
604
665
Commodity and other contracts
$
14,103
$
17,027
Over-the-counter
$
12,972
$
12,958
Cleared
7,562
8,575
Credit derivatives
$
20,534
$
21,533
Total derivatives instruments not designated as ASC 815 hedges
$
385,339
$
373,968
Total derivatives
$
388,561
$
375,344
Cash collateral paid/received
(3)
$
7,541
$
14,308
Less: Netting agreements
(4)
(306,401
)
(306,401
)
Less: Netting cash collateral received/paid
(5)
(38,532
)
(35,666
)
Net receivables/payables included on the Consolidated Balance Sheet
(6)
$
51,169
$
47,585
Additional amounts subject to an enforceable master netting agreement, but not offset on the Consolidated Balance Sheet
Less: Cash collateral received/paid
$
(872
)
$
(121
)
Less: Non-cash collateral received/paid
(12,739
)
(6,929
)
Total net receivables/payables
(6)
$
37,558
$
40,535
(1)
The derivatives fair values are presented in Note 20 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Derivative mark-to-market receivables/payables previously reported within
Other assets/Other liabilities
have been reclassified to
Trading account assets/Trading account liabilities
to conform with the current-period presentation.
(2)
Over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives are derivatives executed and settled bilaterally with counterparties without the use of an organized exchange or central clearing house. Cleared derivatives include derivatives executed bilaterally with a counterparty in the OTC market, but then novated to a central clearing house, whereby the central clearing house becomes the counterparty to both of the original counterparties. Exchange-traded derivatives include derivatives executed directly on an organized exchange that provides pre-trade price transparency.
(3)
Reflects the net amount of the
$43,207 million
and
$52,840 million
of gross cash collateral paid and received, respectively. Of the gross cash collateral paid,
$35,666 million
was used to offset trading derivative liabilities and, of the gross cash collateral received,
$38,532 million
was used to offset trading derivative assets.
(4)
Represents the netting of derivative receivable and payable balances with the same counterparty under enforceable netting agreements. Approximately
$283 billion
,
$14 billion
and
$9 billion
of the netting against trading account asset/liability balances is attributable to each of the OTC, cleared and exchange-traded derivatives, respectively.
160
(5)
Represents the netting of cash collateral paid and received by counterparty under enforceable credit support agreements. Substantially all cash collateral received and paid is netted against OTC derivative assets and liabilities, respectively.
(6)
The net receivables/payables include approximately
$6 billion
of derivative asset and
$8 billion
of derivative liability fair values not subject to enforceable master netting agreements, respectively.
For the
three and nine months ended
September 30, 2018
and
2017
, the amounts recognized in
Principal transactions
in the Consolidated Statement of Income related to derivatives not designated in a qualifying hedging relationship, as well as the underlying non-derivative instruments, are presented in Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Citigroup presents this disclosure by business classification, showing derivative gains and losses related to its trading activities together with gains and losses related to non-derivative instruments within the same trading portfolios, as this represents how these portfolios are risk managed.
The amounts recognized in
Other revenue
in the Consolidated Statement of Income related to derivatives not designated in a qualifying hedging relationship are shown below. The table below does not include any offsetting gains (losses) on the economically hedged items to the extent such amounts are also recorded in
Other revenue
.
Gains (losses) included in
Other revenue
Three Months Ended
September 30,
Nine Months Ended September 30,
In millions of dollars
2018
2017
2018
2017
Interest rate contracts
$
(22
)
$
(5
)
$
(65
)
$
(72
)
Foreign exchange
7
596
(6
)
1,897
Credit derivatives
(200
)
(125
)
(271
)
(501
)
Total
$
(215
)
$
466
$
(342
)
$
1,324
161
Fair Value Hedges
Hedging of Benchmark Interest Rate Risk
Citigroup’s fair value hedges are primarily hedges of fixed-rate long-term debt or assets, such as available-for-sale debt securities or loans.
For qualifying fair value hedges of interest rate risk, the changes in the fair value of the derivative and the change in the fair value of the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk, either total cash flows or benchmark only cash flows are presented within
Interest revenue
or
Interest expense
based on whether the hedged item is an asset or a liability. Prior to the adoption of ASU 2017-12, the fair value of the derivative was presented in
Other revenue
or
Principal transactions
and the difference between the changes in the hedged item and the derivative was defined as ineffectiveness.
Hedging of Foreign Exchange Risk
Citigroup hedges the change in fair value attributable to foreign exchange rate movements in available-for-sale debt securities and long-term debt that are denominated in currencies other than the functional currency of the entity holding the securities or issuing the debt, which may be within or outside the U.S. The hedging instrument may be a forward foreign exchange contract or a cross-currency swap contract. Citigroup considers the premium associated with forward contracts (i.e., the differential between the spot and contractual forward rates) as the cost of hedging; this amount is excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness and reflected directly in earnings over the life of the hedge. Beginning January 1, 2018, Citi excludes changes in cross-currency basis associated with cross-currency swaps from the assessment of hedge effectiveness and records it in
Other comprehensive income.
Hedging of Commodity Price Risk
Citigroup hedges the change in fair value attributable to spot price movements in physical commodities inventory. The hedging instrument is a futures contract to sell the underlying commodity. In this hedge, the change in the value of the hedged inventory is reflected in earnings, which offsets the change in the fair value of the futures contract that is also reflected in earnings. Although the change in the fair value of the hedging instrument recorded in earnings includes changes in forward rates, Citigroup excludes the differential between the spot and the contractual forward rates under the futures contract from the assessment of hedge effectiveness and amortizes it directly into earnings over the life of the hedge.
162
The following table summarizes the gains (losses) on the Company’s fair value hedges:
Gains (losses) on fair value hedges
(1)
Three Months Ended September 30,
Nine Months Ended September 30,
2018
2017
(3)
2018
2017
(3)
In millions of dollars
Other revenue
Net interest revenue
Other
revenue
Other
revenue
Net interest revenue
Other
revenue
Gain (loss) on the derivatives in designated and qualifying fair value hedges
Interest rate hedges
$
—
$
(857
)
$
(194
)
$
—
$
(497
)
$
(570
)
Foreign exchange hedges
(158
)
—
(166
)
341
—
(803
)
Commodity hedges
(14
)
—
(11
)
(14
)
—
(20
)
Total gain (loss) on the derivatives in designated and qualifying fair value hedges
$
(172
)
$
(857
)
$
(371
)
$
327
$
(497
)
$
(1,393
)
Gain (loss) on the hedged item in designated and qualifying fair value hedges
Interest rate hedges
$
—
$
871
$
189
$
—
$
525
$
532
Foreign exchange hedges
132
—
144
(464
)
—
910
Commodity hedges
8
—
12
9
—
22
Total gain (loss) on the hedged item in designated and qualifying fair value hedges
$
140
$
871
$
345
$
(455
)
$
525
$
1,464
Net gain (loss) excluded from assessment of the effectiveness of fair value hedges
Interest rate hedges
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
(5
)
$
(7
)
Foreign exchange hedges
(2)
7
—
(5
)
63
—
75
Commodity hedges
(7
)
—
1
(5
)
—
2
Total net gain (loss) excluded from assessment of the effectiveness of fair value hedges
$
—
$
—
$
(4
)
$
58
$
(5
)
$
70
(1)
Beginning January 1, 2018, gain (loss) amounts for interest rate risk hedges are included in
Interest income/Interest expense
, while the remaining amounts including the amounts for interest rate hedges prior to January 1, 2018 are included in
Other revenue
or
Principal transactions
on the Consolidated Statement of Income. The accrued interest income on fair value hedges both prior to and after January 1, 2018 is recorded in
Net interest revenue
and is excluded from this table.
(2)
Amounts relate to the premium associated with forward contracts (differential between spot and contractual forward rates). These amounts are excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness and are reflected directly in earnings. After January 1, 2018, amounts include cross-currency basis, which is recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income. The amount of cross-currency basis that was included in accumulated other comprehensive income was
$15 million
and
$57 million
for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018, respectively, none of which was recognized in earnings.
(3)
Hedge ineffectiveness recognized in earnings on designated and qualifying fair value hedges for the three months ended September 30, 2017 was
$(5) million
for interest rate hedges and
$(17) million
for foreign exchange hedges, for a total of
$(22) million
. Hedge ineffectiveness recognized in earnings on designated and qualifying fair value hedges for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 was
$(31) million
for interest rate hedges and
$32 million
for foreign exchange hedges, for a total of
$1 million
.
Cumulative Basis Adjustment
Upon electing to apply ASC 815 fair value hedge accounting, the carrying value of the hedged item is adjusted to reflect the cumulative impact of changes in the hedged risk. The hedge basis adjustment, whether arising from an active or de-designated hedge relationship, remains with the hedged item until the hedged item is derecognized from the balance sheet. The table below presents the carrying amount of Citi’s hedged assets and liabilities under qualifying fair value hedges at September 30, 2018, along with the cumulative hedge basis adjustments included in the carrying value of those hedged assets and liabilities.
In millions of dollars as of September 30, 2018
Balance sheet line item in which hedged item is recorded
Carrying amount of hedged asset/ liability
Cumulative fair value hedging adjustment increasing (decreasing) the carrying amount
Active
De-designated
Debt securities
AFS
$
80,244
$
(326
)
$
421
Long-term debt
154,540
(775
)
1,218
163
Cash Flow Hedges
Citigroup hedges the variability of forecasted cash flows associated with floating-rate assets/liabilities and other forecasted transactions. Variable cash flows from those liabilities are synthetically converted to fixed-rate cash flows by entering into receive-variable, pay-fixed interest rate swaps and receive-variable, pay-fixed forward-starting interest rate swaps. Variable cash flows associated with certain assets are synthetically converted to fixed-rate cash flows by entering into receive-fixed, pay-variable interest rate swaps. These cash flow hedging relationships use either regression analysis or dollar-offset ratio analysis to assess whether the hedging relationships are highly effective at inception and on an ongoing basis. Prior to the adoption of ASU 2017-12, Citigroup designated the risk being hedged as the risk of overall variability in the hedged cash flows for certain items.
With the adoption of ASU 2017-12, Citigroup hedges the variability from changes in a contractually specified rate and recognizes the entire change in fair value of the cash flow hedging instruments in AOCI. Prior to the adoption of ASU 2017-12, to the extent that these derivatives were not fully effective, changes in their fair values in excess of changes in the value of the hedged transactions were immediately included in
Other revenue
. With the adoption of ASU 2017-12, such amounts are no longer required to be immediately recognized in income, but instead the full change in the value of the hedging instrument is required to be recognized in AOCI, and then recognized in earnings in the same period that the cash flows impact earnings. The pretax change in AOCI from cash flow hedges is presented below:
Three Months Ended September 30,
Nine Months Ended September 30,
In millions of dollars
2018
2017
2018
2017
Amount of gain (loss) recognized in AOCI on derivative
Interest rate contracts
(1)
$
(146
)
$
(36
)
$
(665
)
$
103
Foreign exchange contracts
(3
)
(7
)
(4
)
(7
)
Total gain (loss) recognized in AOCI
$
(149
)
$
(43
)
$
(669
)
$
96
Amount of gain (loss) reclassified from AOCI to earnings
Other
revenue
Net interest
revenue
Other
revenue
Other
revenue
Net interest
revenue
Other
revenue
Interest rate contracts
(1)
$
—
$
(54
)
$
(48
)
$
—
$
(142
)
$
(94
)
Foreign exchange contracts
2
—
(7
)
(8
)
—
(8
)
Total gain (loss) reclassified from AOCI into earnings
$
2
$
(54
)
$
(55
)
$
(8
)
$
(142
)
$
(102
)
(1)
After January 1, 2018, all amounts reclassified into earnings for interest rate contracts are included in
Interest income/Interest expense (Net interest revenue)
. For all other hedges, including interest rate hedges prior to January 1, 2018, the amounts reclassified to earnings are included primarily in
Other revenue
and
Net interest revenue
on the Consolidated Income Statement.
For cash flow hedges, the changes in the fair value of the hedging derivative remain in AOCI on the Consolidated Balance Sheet and will be included in the earnings of future periods to offset the variability of the hedged cash flows when such cash flows affect earnings. The net gain (loss) associated with cash flow hedges expected to be reclassified from AOCI
within 12 months of
September 30, 2018
is approximately
$475 million
. The maximum length of time over which forecasted cash flows are hedged is
10 years
.
The after-tax impact of cash flow hedges on AOCI is shown in Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
164
Net Investment Hedges
The pretax gain (loss) recorded in the
Foreign currency translation adjustment
account within AOCI, related to net investment hedges, is
$(46) million
and
$1,587 million
for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018, and
$(245) million
and
$(1,993) million
for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively.
Credit Derivatives
The following tables summarize the key characteristics of Citi’s credit derivatives portfolio by counterparty and derivative form:
Fair values
Notionals
In millions of dollars at September 30, 2018
Receivable
(1)
Payable
(2)
Protection
purchased
Protection
sold
By industry/counterparty
Banks
$
5,366
$
5,097
$
222,802
$
234,338
Broker-dealers
1,826
1,661
66,676
67,833
Non-financial
65
90
2,823
4,247
Insurance and other financial
institutions
4,309
4,845
501,491
416,642
Total by industry/counterparty
$
11,566
$
11,693
$
793,792
$
723,060
By instrument
Credit default swaps and options
$
10,997
$
11,168
$
771,239
$
712,451
Total return swaps and other
569
525
22,553
10,609
Total by instrument
$
11,566
$
11,693
$
793,792
$
723,060
By rating
Investment grade
$
5,180
$
5,014
$
616,595
$
552,452
Non-investment grade
6,386
6,679
177,197
170,608
Total by rating
$
11,566
$
11,693
$
793,792
$
723,060
By maturity
Within 1 year
$
1,442
$
1,680
$
232,670
$
204,358
From 1 to 5 years
8,083
7,855
472,276
439,089
After 5 years
2,041
2,158
88,846
79,613
Total by maturity
$
11,566
$
11,693
$
793,792
$
723,060
(1)
The fair value amount receivable is composed of
$3,657 million
under protection purchased and
$7,909 million
under protection sold.
(2)
The fair value amount payable is composed of
$8,476 million
under protection purchased and
$3,217 million
under protection sold.
165
Fair values
Notionals
In millions of dollars at December 31, 2017
Receivable
(1)
Payable
(2)
Protection
purchased
Protection
sold
By industry/counterparty
Banks
$
7,471
$
6,669
$
264,414
$
273,711
Broker-dealers
2,325
2,285
73,273
83,229
Non-financial
70
91
1,288
1,140
Insurance and other financial
institutions
10,668
12,488
438,738
377,062
Total by industry/counterparty
$
20,534
$
21,533
$
777,713
$
735,142
By instrument
Credit default swaps and options
$
20,251
$
20,554
$
754,114
$
724,228
Total return swaps and other
283
979
23,599
10,914
Total by instrument
$
20,534
$
21,533
$
777,713
$
735,142
By rating
Investment grade
$
10,473
$
10,616
$
588,324
$
557,987
Non-investment grade
10,061
10,917
189,389
177,155
Total by rating
$
20,534
$
21,533
$
777,713
$
735,142
By maturity
Within 1 year
$
2,477
$
2,914
$
231,878
$
218,097
From 1 to 5 years
16,098
16,435
498,606
476,345
After 5 years
1,959
2,184
47,229
40,700
Total by maturity
$
20,534
$
21,533
$
777,713
$
735,142
(1)
The fair value amount receivable is composed of
$3,195 million
under protection purchased and
$17,339
under protection sold.
(2)
The fair value amount payable is composed of $
3,147 million
under protection purchased and $
18,386 million
under protection sold.
Credit Risk-Related Contingent Features in Derivatives
Certain derivative instruments contain provisions that require the Company to either post additional collateral or immediately settle any outstanding liability balances upon the occurrence of a specified event related to the credit risk of the Company. These events, which are defined by the existing derivative contracts, are primarily downgrades in the credit ratings of the Company and its affiliates.
The fair value (excluding CVA) of all derivative instruments with credit risk-related contingent features that were in a net liability position at both September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 was
$37 billion
and
$29 billion
, respectively. The Company posted
$36 billion
and
$28 billion
as collateral for this exposure in the normal course of business as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively.
A downgrade could trigger additional collateral or cash settlement requirements for the Company and certain affiliates. In the event that Citigroup and Citibank were downgraded a single notch by all
three
major rating agencies as of September 30, 2018, the Company could be required to post an additional
$1.4 billion
as either collateral or settlement of the derivative transactions. Additionally, the Company could be required to segregate with third-party custodians collateral previously received from existing derivative counterparties in the amount of
$0.2 billion
upon the single notch downgrade, resulting in aggregate cash obligations and collateral requirements of approximately
$1.6 billion
.
Derivatives Accompanied by Financial Asset Transfers
For transfers of financial assets accounted for as a sale by the Company and for which the Company has retained substantially all of the economic exposure to the transferred asset through a total return swap executed with the same counterparty in contemplation of the initial sale (and still outstanding), both the asset amounts derecognized and the gross cash proceeds received as of the date of derecognition were
$3.3 billion
and
$3.0 billion
as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively.
At
September 30, 2018
, the fair value of these previously derecognized assets was
$3.2 billion
. The fair value of the total return swaps as of September 30, 2018 was
$24 million
recorded as gross derivative assets and
$31 million
recorded as gross derivative liabilities. At December 31, 2017, the fair value of these previously derecognized assets was
$3.1 billion
, and the fair value of the total return swaps was
$89 million
recorded as gross derivative assets and
$15 million
recorded as gross derivative liabilities.
The balances for the total return swaps are on a gross basis, before the application of counterparty and cash collateral netting, and are included primarily as equity derivatives in the tabular disclosures in this Note.
166
20. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT
For additional information regarding fair value measurement at Citi, see Note 24 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Citi’s
2017
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Market Valuation Adjustments
The table below summarizes the credit valuation adjustments (CVA) and funding valuation adjustments (FVA) applied to the fair value of derivative instruments at
September 30, 2018
and
December 31, 2017
:
Credit and funding valuation adjustments
contra-liability (contra-asset)
In millions of dollars
September 30,
2018
December 31,
2017
Counterparty CVA
$
(815
)
$
(970
)
Asset FVA
(324
)
(447
)
Citigroup (own-credit) CVA
317
287
Liability FVA
39
47
Total CVA—derivative instruments
(1)
$
(783
)
$
(1,083
)
(1)
FVA is included with CVA for presentation purposes.
The table below summarizes pretax gains (losses) related to changes in CVA on derivative instruments, net of hedges, FVA on derivatives and debt valuation adjustments (DVA) on Citi’s own fair value option (FVO) liabilities for the periods indicated:
Credit/funding/debt valuation
adjustments gain (loss)
Three Months Ended September 30,
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
In millions of dollars
2018
2017
2018
2017
Counterparty CVA
$
94
$
27
$
117
$
197
Asset FVA
74
(5
)
123
74
Own-credit CVA
(75
)
(2
)
24
(127
)
Liability FVA
(23
)
(16
)
(8
)
(10
)
Total CVA—derivative instruments
$
70
$
4
$
256
$
134
DVA related to own FVO liabilities
(1)
$
(377
)
$
(195
)
$
208
$
(422
)
Total CVA and DVA
(2)
$
(307
)
$
(191
)
$
464
$
(288
)
(1)
See Note 1 and Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(2)
FVA is included with CVA for presentation purposes.
167
Items Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The following tables present for each of the fair value hierarchy levels the Company’s assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis at
September 30, 2018
and
December 31, 2017
. The Company may hedge positions that have been classified in the Level 3 category with other financial instruments (hedging instruments) that may be
classified as Level 3, but also with financial instruments classified as Level 1 or Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. The effects of these hedges are presented gross in the following tables:
Fair Value Levels
In millions of dollars at September 30, 2018
Level 1
(1)
Level 2
(1)
Level 3
Gross
inventory
Netting
(2)
Net
balance
Assets
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed and purchased under agreements to resell
$
—
$
241,745
$
65
$
241,810
$
(63,368
)
$
178,442
Trading non-derivative assets
Trading mortgage-backed securities
U.S. government-sponsored agency guaranteed
—
20,293
128
20,421
—
20,421
Residential
1
730
215
946
—
946
Commercial
—
1,346
57
1,403
—
1,403
Total trading mortgage-backed securities
$
1
$
22,369
$
400
$
22,770
$
—
$
22,770
U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities
$
22,054
$
5,347
$
6
$
27,407
$
—
$
27,407
State and municipal
—
3,612
200
3,812
—
3,812
Foreign government
44,714
19,945
52
64,711
—
64,711
Corporate
835
13,409
253
14,497
—
14,497
Equity securities
45,556
8,195
170
53,921
—
53,921
Asset-backed securities
—
1,628
1,453
3,081
—
3,081
Other trading assets
(3)
5
10,355
730
11,090
—
11,090
Total trading non-derivative assets
$
113,165
$
84,860
$
3,264
$
201,289
$
—
$
201,289
Trading derivatives
Interest rate contracts
$
183
$
163,345
$
2,313
$
165,841
Foreign exchange contracts
6
174,455
510
174,971
Equity contracts
2,495
27,255
294
30,044
Commodity contracts
15
22,576
684
23,275
Credit derivatives
—
10,750
816
11,566
Total trading derivatives
$
2,699
$
398,381
$
4,617
$
405,697
Cash collateral paid
(4)
$
10,759
Netting agreements
$
(322,565
)
Netting of cash collateral received
(37,678
)
Total trading derivatives
$
2,699
$
398,381
$
4,617
$
416,456
$
(360,243
)
$
56,213
Investments
Mortgage-backed securities
U.S. government-sponsored agency guaranteed
$
—
$
45,127
$
34
$
45,161
$
—
$
45,161
Residential
—
1,627
—
1,627
—
1,627
Commercial
—
226
5
231
—
231
Total investment mortgage-backed securities
$
—
$
46,980
$
39
$
47,019
$
—
$
47,019
U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities
$
106,098
$
10,045
$
—
$
116,143
$
—
$
116,143
State and municipal
—
8,798
682
9,480
—
9,480
Foreign government
56,866
37,514
81
94,461
—
94,461
Corporate
4,687
7,693
—
12,380
—
12,380
Equity securities
246
14
—
260
—
260
Asset-backed securities
—
978
284
1,262
—
1,262
Other debt securities
—
4,037
—
4,037
—
4,037
Non-marketable equity securities
(5)
—
170
733
903
—
903
Total investments
$
167,897
$
116,229
$
1,819
$
285,945
$
—
$
285,945
Table continues on the next page.
168
In millions of dollars at September 30, 2018
Level 1
(1)
Level 2
(1)
Level 3
Gross
inventory
Netting
(2)
Net
balance
Loans
$
—
$
3,856
$
383
$
4,239
$
—
$
4,239
Mortgage servicing rights
—
—
618
618
—
618
Non-trading derivatives and other financial assets measured on a recurring basis
$
19,789
$
5,362
$
—
$
25,151
$
—
$
25,151
Total assets
$
303,550
$
850,433
$
10,766
$
1,175,508
$
(423,611
)
$
751,897
Total as a percentage of gross assets
(6)
26.1
%
73.0
%
0.9
%
Liabilities
Interest-bearing deposits
$
—
$
1,137
$
303
$
1,440
$
—
$
1,440
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned and sold under agreements to repurchase
—
110,519
997
111,516
(63,368
)
48,148
Trading account liabilities
Securities sold, not yet purchased
85,760
10,281
387
96,428
—
96,428
Other trading liabilities
—
1,484
—
1,484
—
1,484
Total trading liabilities
$
85,760
$
11,765
$
387
$
97,912
$
—
$
97,912
Trading derivatives
Interest rate contracts
$
189
$
145,460
$
2,194
$
147,843
Foreign exchange contracts
7
168,557
321
168,885
Equity contracts
2,667
31,254
1,208
35,129
Commodity contracts
5
23,286
2,489
25,780
Credit derivatives
—
9,871
1,822
11,693
Total trading derivatives
$
2,868
$
378,428
$
8,034
$
389,330
Cash collateral received
(7)
$
13,676
Netting agreements
$
(322,565
)
Netting of cash collateral paid
(30,701
)
Total trading derivatives
$
2,868
$
378,428
$
8,034
$
403,006
$
(353,266
)
$
49,740
Short-term borrowings
$
—
$
5,002
$
39
$
5,041
$
—
$
5,041
Long-term debt
—
22,980
13,791
36,771
—
36,771
Total non-trading derivatives and other financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis
$
19,789
$
158
$
—
$
19,947
$
—
$
19,947
Total liabilities
$
108,417
$
529,989
$
23,551
$
675,633
$
(416,634
)
$
258,999
Total as a percentage of gross liabilities
(6)
16.4
%
80.1
%
3.6
%
(1)
For the
three and nine months
ended
September 30, 2018
, the Company transferred assets of approximately
$1.7 billion
and
$3.4 billion
from Level 1 to Level 2, primarily related to foreign government securities and equity securities not traded in active markets. During the
three and nine months
ended
September 30, 2018
, the Company transferred assets of approximately
$2.6 billion
and
$7.9 billion
from Level 2 to Level 1, primarily related to foreign government bonds, foreign corporate securities, marketable certificates of deposits and equity securities traded with sufficient frequency to constitute an active market. For the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2018
, there were
$0.1 billion
and
$0.3 billion
transfers of liabilities from Level 1 to Level 2. During the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2018
, the Company transferred liabilities of approximately
$0.3 billion
and
$0.7 billion
, from Level 2 to Level 1.
(2)
Represents netting of (i) the amounts due under securities purchased under agreements to resell and the amounts owed under securities sold under agreements to repurchase and (ii) derivative exposures covered by a qualifying master netting agreement and cash collateral offsetting.
(3)
Includes positions related to investments in unallocated precious metals, as discussed in Note 21 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Also includes physical commodities accounted for at the lower of cost or fair value and unfunded credit products.
(4)
Reflects the net amount of
$48,437 million
gross cash collateral paid, of which
$37,678 million
was used to offset trading derivative liabilities.
(5)
Amounts exclude
$0.2 billion
of investments measured at Net Asset Value (NAV) in accordance with ASU 2015-07,
Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosures for Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent).
(6)
Because the amount of the cash collateral paid/received has not been allocated to the Level 1, 2 and 3 subtotals, these percentages are calculated based on total assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, excluding the cash collateral paid/received on derivatives.
(7)
Reflects the net amount
$44,377 million
of gross cash collateral received, of which
$30,701 million
was used to offset trading derivative assets.
169
Fair Value Levels
In millions of dollars at December 31, 2017
Level 1
(1)
Level 2
(1)
Level 3
Gross
inventory
Netting
(2)
Net
balance
Assets
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed and purchased under agreements to resell
$
—
$
188,571
$
16
$
188,587
$
(55,638
)
$
132,949
Trading non-derivative assets
Trading mortgage-backed securities
U.S. government-sponsored agency guaranteed
—
22,801
163
22,964
—
22,964
Residential
—
649
164
813
—
813
Commercial
—
1,309
57
1,366
—
1,366
Total trading mortgage-backed securities
$
—
$
24,759
$
384
$
25,143
$
—
$
25,143
U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities
$
17,524
$
3,613
$
—
$
21,137
$
—
$
21,137
State and municipal
—
4,426
274
4,700
—
4,700
Foreign government
39,347
20,843
16
60,206
—
60,206
Corporate
301
15,129
275
15,705
—
15,705
Equity securities
53,305
6,794
120
60,219
—
60,219
Asset-backed securities
—
1,198
1,590
2,788
—
2,788
Other trading assets
(3)
3
11,105
615
11,723
—
11,723
Total trading non-derivative assets
$
110,480
$
87,867
$
3,274
$
201,621
$
—
$
201,621
Trading derivatives
Interest rate contracts
$
145
$
203,134
$
1,708
$
204,987
Foreign exchange contracts
19
121,363
577
121,959
Equity contracts
2,364
24,170
444
26,978
Commodity contracts
282
13,252
569
14,103
Credit derivatives
—
19,624
910
20,534
Total trading derivatives
$
2,810
$
381,543
$
4,208
$
388,561
Cash collateral paid
(4)
$
7,541
Netting agreements
$
(306,401
)
Netting of cash collateral received
(38,532
)
Total trading derivatives
$
2,810
$
381,543
$
4,208
$
396,102
$
(344,933
)
$
51,169
Investments
Mortgage-backed securities
U.S. government-sponsored agency guaranteed
$
—
$
41,717
$
24
$
41,741
$
—
$
41,741
Residential
—
2,884
—
2,884
—
2,884
Commercial
—
329
3
332
—
332
Total investment mortgage-backed securities
$
—
$
44,930
$
27
$
44,957
$
—
$
44,957
U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities
$
106,964
$
11,182
$
—
$
118,146
$
—
$
118,146
State and municipal
—
8,028
737
8,765
—
8,765
Foreign government
56,456
43,985
92
100,533
—
100,533
Corporate
1,911
12,127
71
14,109
—
14,109
Equity securities
176
11
2
189
—
189
Asset-backed securities
—
3,091
827
3,918
—
3,918
Other debt securities
—
297
—
297
—
297
Non-marketable equity securities
(5)
—
121
681
802
—
802
Total investments
$
165,507
$
123,772
$
2,437
$
291,716
$
—
$
291,716
Table continues on the next page.
170
In millions of dollars at December 31, 2017
Level 1
(1)
Level 2
(1)
Level 3
Gross
inventory
Netting
(2)
Net
balance
Loans
$
—
$
3,824
$
550
$
4,374
$
—
$
4,374
Mortgage servicing rights
—
—
558
558
—
558
Non-trading derivatives and other financial assets measured on a recurring basis
$
13,903
$
4,640
$
16
$
18,559
$
—
$
18,559
Total assets
$
292,700
$
790,217
$
11,059
$
1,101,517
$
(400,571
)
$
700,946
Total as a percentage of gross assets
(6)
26.8
%
72.2
%
1.0
%
Liabilities
Interest-bearing deposits
$
—
$
1,179
$
286
$
1,465
$
—
$
1,465
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned and sold under agreements to repurchase
—
95,550
726
96,276
(55,638
)
40,638
Trading account liabilities
Securities sold, not yet purchased
65,843
10,306
22
76,171
—
76,171
Other trading liabilities
—
1,409
5
1,414
—
1,414
Total trading liabilities
$
65,843
$
11,715
$
27
$
77,585
$
—
$
77,585
Trading account derivatives
Interest rate contracts
$
137
$
182,372
$
2,130
$
184,639
Foreign exchange contracts
9
120,316
447
120,772
Equity contracts
2,430
26,472
2,471
31,373
Commodity contracts
115
14,482
2,430
17,027
Credit derivatives
—
19,824
1,709
21,533
Total trading derivatives
$
2,691
$
363,466
$
9,187
$
375,344
Cash collateral received
(7)
$
14,308
Netting agreements
$
(306,401
)
Netting of cash collateral paid
(35,666
)
Total trading derivatives
$
2,691
$
363,466
$
9,187
$
389,652
$
(342,067
)
$
47,585
Short-term borrowings
$
—
$
4,609
$
18
$
4,627
$
—
$
4,627
Long-term debt
—
18,310
13,082
31,392
—
31,392
Non-trading derivatives and other financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis
$
13,903
$
50
$
8
$
13,961
$
—
$
13,961
Total liabilities
$
82,437
$
494,879
$
23,334
$
614,958
$
(397,705
)
$
217,253
Total as a percentage of gross liabilities
(6)
13.7
%
82.4
%
3.9
%
(1)
In 2017, the Company transferred assets of approximately
$4.8 billion
from Level 1 to Level 2, primarily related to foreign government securities and equity securities not traded in active markets. In 2017, the Company transferred assets of approximately
$4.0 billion
from Level 2 to Level 1, primarily related to foreign government bonds and equity securities traded with sufficient frequency to constitute a liquid market. In 2017, the Company transferred liabilities of approximately
$0.4 billion
from Level 1 to Level 2. In 2017, the Company transferred liabilities of approximately
$0.3 billion
from Level 2 to Level 1.
(2)
Represents netting of (i) the amounts due under securities purchased under agreements to resell and the amounts owed under securities sold under agreements to repurchase and (ii) derivative exposures covered by a qualifying master netting agreement and cash collateral offsetting.
(3)
Includes positions related to investments in unallocated precious metals, as discussed in Note 21 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Also includes physical commodities accounted for at the lower of cost or fair value and unfunded credit products.
(4)
Reflects the net amount of
$43,207 million
of gross cash collateral paid, of which
$35,666 million
was used to offset trading derivative liabilities.
(5)
Amounts exclude
$0.4 billion
of investments measured at Net Asset Value (NAV) in accordance with ASU No. 2015-07,
Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosures for Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent).
(6)
Because the amount of the cash collateral paid/received has not been allocated to the Level 1, 2 and 3 subtotals, these percentages are calculated based on total assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, excluding the cash collateral paid/received on derivatives.
(7)
Reflects the net amount of
$52,840 million
of gross cash collateral received, of which
$38,532 million
was used to offset trading derivative assets.
171
Changes in Level 3 Fair Value Category
The following tables present the changes in the Level 3 fair value category for the
three and nine months ended
September 30, 2018
and
2017
. The gains and losses presented below include changes in the fair value related to both observable and unobservable inputs.
The Company often hedges positions with offsetting positions that are classified in a different level. For example,
the gains and losses for assets and liabilities in the Level 3 category presented in the tables below do not reflect the effect of offsetting losses and gains on hedging instruments that may be classified in the Level 1 or Level 2 categories. In addition, the Company hedges items classified in the Level 3 category with instruments also classified in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. The hedged items and related hedges are presented gross in the following tables:
Level 3 Fair Value Rollforward
Net realized/unrealized
gains (losses) incl. in
Transfers
Unrealized
gains
(losses)
still held
(3)
In millions of dollars
Jun. 30, 2018
Principal
transactions
Other
(1)(2)
into
Level 3
out of
Level 3
Purchases
Issuances
Sales
Settlements
Sept. 30, 2018
Assets
Federal funds sold and
securities borrowed
and
purchased under
agreements to resell
$
66
$
—
$
—
$
(1
)
$
—
$
61
$
—
$
—
$
(61
)
$
65
$
4
Trading non-derivative assets
Trading mortgage-
backed securities
U.S. government-sponsored agency guaranteed
99
(2
)
—
3
(7
)
38
—
(3
)
—
128
(2
)
Residential
132
111
—
17
(36
)
8
—
(17
)
—
215
(2
)
Commercial
51
(2
)
—
4
(8
)
29
—
(17
)
—
57
(1
)
Total trading mortgage-
backed securities
$
282
$
107
$
—
$
24
$
(51
)
$
75
$
—
$
(37
)
$
—
$
400
$
(5
)
U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities
$
7
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
(1
)
$
6
$
—
State and municipal
226
6
—
—
(52
)
22
—
(2
)
—
200
6
Foreign government
36
27
—
—
(8
)
4
—
(7
)
—
52
26
Corporate
520
(214
)
—
24
(15
)
110
—
(172
)
—
253
7
Equity securities
293
(87
)
—
7
(21
)
24
—
(46
)
—
170
(99
)
Asset-backed securities
1,688
(44
)
—
20
(39
)
305
—
(477
)
—
1,453
(45
)
Other trading assets
542
78
—
94
(10
)
185
2
(157
)
(4
)
730
53
Total trading non-
derivative assets
$
3,594
$
(127
)
$
—
$
169
$
(196
)
$
725
$
2
$
(898
)
$
(5
)
$
3,264
$
(57
)
Trading derivatives, net
(4)
Interest rate contracts
$
86
$
10
$
—
$
(11
)
$
(2
)
$
—
$
8
$
—
$
28
$
119
$
59
Foreign exchange contracts
239
(16
)
—
(15
)
56
4
—
(66
)
(13
)
189
(51
)
Equity contracts
(1,446
)
265
—
3
372
3
(15
)
(3
)
(93
)
(914
)
283
Commodity contracts
(1,906
)
(67
)
—
44
(16
)
12
—
(8
)
136
(1,805
)
1
Credit derivatives
(848
)
(240
)
—
(6
)
7
—
—
—
81
(1,006
)
(231
)
Total trading derivatives,
net
(4)
$
(3,875
)
$
(48
)
$
—
$
15
$
417
$
19
$
(7
)
$
(77
)
$
139
$
(3,417
)
$
61
Table continues on the next page.
172
Net realized/unrealized
gains (losses) incl. in
Transfers
Unrealized
gains
(losses)
still held
(3)
In millions of dollars
Jun. 30, 2018
Principal
transactions
Other
(1)(2)
into
Level 3
out of
Level 3
Purchases
Issuances
Sales
Settlements
Sept. 30, 2018
Investments
Mortgage-backed securities
U.S. government-sponsored agency guaranteed
$
34
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
34
$
—
Residential
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Commercial
6
—
—
—
(1
)
—
—
—
—
5
—
Total investment mortgage-backed securities
$
40
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
(1
)
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
39
$
—
U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
State and municipal
762
—
(10
)
—
—
17
—
(87
)
—
682
(7
)
Foreign government
54
—
(3
)
—
(2
)
45
—
(13
)
—
81
(3
)
Corporate
68
—
—
—
(64
)
—
—
(4
)
—
—
—
Equity securities
1
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(1
)
—
—
Asset-backed securities
456
—
(6
)
—
(177
)
34
—
(23
)
—
284
(5
)
Other debt securities
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Non-marketable equity securities
611
—
(73
)
163
—
71
—
(40
)
1
733
(70
)
Total investments
$
1,992
$
—
$
(92
)
$
163
$
(244
)
$
167
$
—
$
(167
)
$
—
$
1,819
$
(85
)
Loans
$
381
$
—
$
(27
)
$
—
$
(46
)
$
79
$
—
$
(3
)
$
(1
)
$
383
$
95
Mortgage servicing rights
596
—
25
—
—
—
14
—
(17
)
618
26
Other financial assets measured on a recurring basis
—
—
15
—
—
—
—
(4
)
(11
)
—
14
Liabilities
Interest-bearing deposits
$
320
$
—
$
14
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
(3
)
$
303
$
14
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned and sold under agreements to repurchase
966
(31
)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
997
24
Trading account liabilities
Securities sold, not yet purchased
189
(137
)
—
28
(55
)
14
121
(45
)
(2
)
387
(90
)
Other trading liabilities
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Short-term borrowings
90
1
—
—
(18
)
—
5
—
(37
)
39
19
Long-term debt
13,781
(231
)
—
445
(646
)
—
(42
)
(1
)
23
13,791
(298
)
Other financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(1)
Changes in fair value of available-for-sale debt securities are recorded in AOCI, unless related to other-than-temporary impairment, while gains and losses from sales are recorded in
Realized gains (losses) from sales of investments
on the Consolidated Statement of Income.
(2)
Unrealized gains (losses) on MSRs are recorded in
Other revenue
on the Consolidated Statement of Income.
(3)
Represents the amount of total gains or losses for the period, included in earnings (and AOCI for changes in fair value of available-for-sale debt securities), attributable to the change in fair value relating to assets and liabilities classified as Level 3 that are still held at
September 30, 2018
.
(4)
Total Level 3 trading derivative assets and liabilities have been netted in these tables for presentation purposes only.
173
Net realized/unrealized
gains (losses) incl. in
Transfers
Unrealized
gains
(losses)
still held
(3)
In millions of dollars
Dec. 31, 2017
Principal
transactions
Other
(1)(2)
into
Level 3
out of
Level 3
Purchases
Issuances
Sales
Settlements
Sept. 30, 2018
Assets
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed and purchased under agreements to resell
16
19
—
48
—
61
—
—
(79
)
65
10
Trading non-derivative assets
Trading mortgage-backed securities
U.S. government-sponsored agency guaranteed
163
—
—
92
(97
)
191
—
(221
)
—
128
—
Residential
164
116
—
75
(124
)
99
—
(115
)
—
215
(1
)
Commercial
57
(3
)
—
15
(45
)
67
—
(34
)
—
57
2
Total trading mortgage-backed securities
384
113
—
182
(266
)
357
—
(370
)
—
400
1
U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities
—
—
—
6
—
1
—
—
(1
)
6
—
State and municipal
274
16
—
—
(96
)
35
—
(29
)
—
200
8
Foreign government
16
26
—
2
(13
)
50
—
(29
)
—
52
26
Corporate
275
(119
)
—
85
(106
)
389
—
(271
)
—
253
(1
)
Equity securities
120
(5
)
—
24
(41
)
266
—
(194
)
—
170
(68
)
Asset-backed securities
1,590
31
—
65
(86
)
994
—
(1,141
)
—
1,453
(6
)
Other trading assets
615
161
—
179
(52
)
342
7
(509
)
(13
)
730
31
Total trading non-derivative assets
3,274
223
—
543
(660
)
2,434
7
(2,543
)
(14
)
3,264
(9
)
Trading derivatives, net
(4)
Interest rate contracts
(422
)
597
—
(6
)
(74
)
8
8
(16
)
24
119
540
Foreign exchange contracts
130
89
—
(28
)
59
11
—
(71
)
(1
)
189
52
Equity contracts
(2,027
)
163
—
(70
)
1,123
20
(15
)
(14
)
(94
)
(914
)
66
Commodity contracts
(1,861
)
(241
)
—
1
82
39
—
(8
)
183
(1,805
)
(70
)
Credit derivatives
(799
)
(338
)
—
(15
)
19
2
—
1
124
(1,006
)
(468
)
Total trading derivatives, net
(4)
(4,979
)
270
—
(118
)
1,209
80
(7
)
(108
)
236
(3,417
)
120
Investments
Mortgage-backed securities
U.S. government-sponsored agency guaranteed
24
—
10
—
—
—
—
—
—
34
(12
)
Residential
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Commercial
3
—
2
1
(1
)
—
—
—
—
5
—
Total investment mortgage-backed securities
27
—
12
1
(1
)
—
—
—
—
39
(12
)
U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
State and municipal
737
—
(23
)
—
(18
)
157
—
(171
)
—
682
(32
)
Foreign government
92
—
(7
)
1
(4
)
107
—
(108
)
—
81
(3
)
Corporate
71
—
(1
)
3
(66
)
3
—
(10
)
—
—
—
Equity securities
2
—
—
—
—
—
—
(1
)
(1
)
—
—
Asset-backed securities
827
—
(21
)
3
(521
)
45
—
(49
)
—
284
(6
)
Other debt securities
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Non-marketable equity securities
681
—
(103
)
193
—
86
—
(73
)
(51
)
733
(56
)
Total investments
2,437
—
(143
)
201
(610
)
398
—
(412
)
(52
)
1,819
(109
)
174
Net realized/unrealized
gains (losses) incl. in
Transfers
Unrealized
gains
(losses)
still held
(3)
In millions of dollars
Dec. 31, 2017
Principal
transactions
Other
(1)(2)
into
Level 3
out of
Level 3
Purchases
Issuances
Sales
Settlements
Sept. 30, 2018
Loans
550
—
(282
)
—
13
130
—
(25
)
(3
)
383
286
Mortgage servicing rights
558
—
82
—
—
—
46
(18
)
(50
)
618
83
Other financial assets measured on a recurring basis
16
—
37
—
(11
)
4
12
(8
)
(50
)
—
53
Liabilities
Interest-bearing deposits
286
—
37
12
—
—
45
—
(3
)
303
(104
)
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned and sold under agreements to repurchase
726
8
—
—
—
—
243
—
36
997
52
Trading account liabilities
Securities sold, not yet purchased
22
(384
)
—
35
(86
)
14
121
(36
)
(67
)
387
(128
)
Other trading liabilities
5
5
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Short-term borrowings
18
2
—
48
(39
)
—
54
—
(40
)
39
22
Long-term debt
13,082
(474
)
—
2,200
(1,950
)
36
(35
)
(45
)
29
13,791
(1,709
)
Other financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis
8
—
(2
)
1
(10
)
—
2
—
(3
)
—
(9
)
(1)
Changes in fair value of available-for-sale debt securities are recorded in AOCI, unless related to other-than-temporary impairment, while gains and losses from sales are recorded in
Realized gains (losses) from sales of investments
on the Consolidated Statement of Income.
(2)
Unrealized gains (losses) on MSRs are recorded in
Other revenue
on the Consolidated Statement of Income.
(3)
Represents the amount of total gains or losses for the period, included in earnings (and AOCI for changes in fair value of available-for-sale debt securities), attributable to the change in fair value relating to assets and liabilities classified as Level 3 that are still held at
December 31, 2017
.
(4)
Total Level 3 trading derivative assets and liabilities have been netted in these tables for presentation purposes only.
175
Net realized/unrealized
gains (losses) incl. in
Transfers
Unrealized
gains
(losses)
still held
(3)
In millions of dollars
Jun. 30, 2017
Principal
transactions
Other
(1)(2)
into
Level 3
out of
Level 3
Purchases
Issuances
Sales
Settlements
Sept. 30, 2017
Assets
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed and purchased under agreements to resell
$
1,002
$
(338
)
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
664
$
(338
)
Trading non-derivative assets
Trading mortgage-backed securities
U.S. government-sponsored agency guaranteed
$
204
$
—
$
—
$
75
$
(21
)
$
174
$
—
$
(123
)
$
—
$
309
$
—
Residential
327
24
—
41
(9
)
39
—
(71
)
—
351
12
Commercial
318
10
—
22
(17
)
11
—
(232
)
—
112
5
Total trading mortgage-backed securities
$
849
$
34
$
—
$
138
$
(47
)
$
224
$
—
$
(426
)
$
—
$
772
$
17
U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
State and municipal
284
(2
)
—
—
—
49
—
(61
)
—
270
(1
)
Foreign government
108
(5
)
—
4
(114
)
161
—
(59
)
—
95
(2
)
Corporate
401
105
—
16
(11
)
148
—
(268
)
—
391
103
Equity securities
240
183
—
3
(41
)
29
—
(178
)
—
236
6
Asset-backed securities
1,570
114
—
5
(6
)
481
—
(460
)
—
1,704
26
Other trading assets
1,803
(38
)
—
38
(607
)
1,349
4
(394
)
(4
)
2,151
29
Total trading non-derivative assets
$
5,255
$
391
$
—
$
204
$
(826
)
$
2,441
$
4
$
(1,846
)
$
(4
)
$
5,619
$
178
Trading derivatives, net
(4)
Interest rate contracts
(288
)
196
—
4
(4
)
25
—
(20
)
(114
)
(201
)
120
Foreign exchange contracts
184
(92
)
—
1
(4
)
(6
)
—
(3
)
68
148
(92
)
Equity contracts
(1,647
)
201
—
(52
)
(34
)
31
—
(126
)
(221
)
(1,848
)
(10
)
Commodity contracts
(2,024
)
(248
)
—
(29
)
(10
)
—
—
(3
)
(25
)
(2,339
)
(255
)
Credit derivatives
(1,339
)
(150
)
—
25
115
7
—
—
401
(941
)
(185
)
Total trading derivatives, net
(4)
$
(5,114
)
$
(93
)
$
—
$
(51
)
$
63
$
57
$
—
$
(152
)
$
109
$
(5,181
)
$
(422
)
Investments
Mortgage-backed securities
U.S. government-sponsored agency guaranteed
$
50
$
—
$
12
$
—
$
(5
)
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
57
$
28
Residential
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Commercial
—
—
—
3
—
—
—
—
—
3
—
Total investment mortgage-backed securities
$
50
$
—
$
12
$
3
$
(5
)
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
60
$
28
U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities
$
1
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
(1
)
$
—
$
—
$
—
State and municipal
1,285
—
(2
)
21
(3
)
16
—
(45
)
—
1,272
17
Foreign government
358
—
(58
)
—
(18
)
122
—
(103
)
—
301
(7
)
Corporate
156
—
146
10
(2
)
41
—
(231
)
—
120
—
Equity securities
9
—
(1
)
—
—
—
—
(5
)
—
3
—
Asset-backed securities
1,028
—
(280
)
2
(7
)
504
—
(417
)
—
830
(134
)
Other debt securities
10
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
10
—
Non-marketable equity securities
939
—
(61
)
—
—
1
—
(1
)
(49
)
829
(18
)
Total investments
$
3,836
$
—
$
(244
)
$
36
$
(35
)
$
684
$
—
$
(803
)
$
(49
)
$
3,425
$
(114
)
176
Net realized/unrealized
gains (losses) incl. in
Transfers
Unrealized
gains
(losses)
still held
(3)
In millions of dollars
Jun. 30, 2017
Principal
transactions
Other
(1)(2)
into
Level 3
out of
Level 3
Purchases
Issuances
Sales
Settlements
Sept. 30, 2017
Loans
$
577
$
—
$
73
$
—
$
—
$
131
$
—
$
(236
)
$
(1
)
$
544
$
264
Mortgage servicing rights
560
—
(6
)
—
—
—
19
—
(20
)
553
3
Other financial assets measured on a recurring basis
17
—
13
—
—
1
43
(4
)
(56
)
14
17
Liabilities
Interest-bearing deposits
$
300
$
—
$
(2
)
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
(2
)
$
300
$
6
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned and sold under agreements to repurchase
807
(1
)
—
—
—
—
—
—
(43
)
765
4
Trading account liabilities
Securities sold, not yet purchased
1,143
496
—
5
(10
)
—
—
88
(46
)
684
24
Short-term borrowings
29
(13
)
—
3
(1
)
—
12
—
—
56
7
Long-term debt
11,831
1,057
—
181
(490
)
—
419
—
437
11,321
716
Other financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis
2
—
—
—
—
—
1
—
(1
)
2
(1
)
177
Net realized/unrealized
gains (losses) incl. in
Transfers
Unrealized
gains
(losses)
still held
(3)
In millions of dollars
Dec. 31, 2016
Principal
transactions
Other
(1)(2)
into
Level 3
out of
Level 3
Purchases
Issuances
Sales
Settlements
Sept. 30, 2017
Assets
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed and purchased under agreements to resell
$
1,496
$
(340
)
$
—
$
—
$
(491
)
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
(1
)
$
664
$
—
Trading non-derivative assets
Trading mortgage-backed securities
U.S. government-sponsored agency guaranteed
176
4
—
154
(86
)
438
—
(377
)
—
309
1
Residential
399
61
—
88
(58
)
105
—
(244
)
—
351
35
Commercial
206
7
—
66
(46
)
445
—
(566
)
—
112
(5
)
Total trading mortgage-backed securities
$
781
$
72
$
—
$
308
$
(190
)
$
988
$
—
$
(1,187
)
$
—
$
772
$
31
U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities
$
1
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
(1
)
$
—
$
—
$
—
State and municipal
296
3
—
24
(48
)
137
—
(142
)
—
270
(1
)
Foreign government
40
2
—
88
(204
)
288
—
(119
)
—
95
(1
)
Corporate
324
320
—
132
(84
)
424
—
(725
)
—
391
167
Equity securities
127
212
—
135
(54
)
38
—
(222
)
—
236
20
Asset-backed securities
1,868
251
—
28
(87
)
1,185
—
(1,541
)
—
1,704
34
Other trading assets
2,814
(88
)
—
470
(1,381
)
2,002
5
(1,652
)
(19
)
2,151
29
Total trading non-derivative assets
$
6,251
$
772
$
—
$
1,185
$
(2,048
)
$
5,062
$
5
$
(5,589
)
$
(19
)
$
5,619
$
279
Trading derivatives, net
(4)
Interest rate contracts
$
(663
)
$
4
$
—
$
(24
)
$
647
$
90
$
—
$
(225
)
$
(30
)
$
(201
)
$
65
Foreign exchange contracts
413
(389
)
—
54
(63
)
32
—
(37
)
138
148
(134
)
Equity contracts
(1,557
)
98
—
(34
)
(8
)
180
—
(263
)
(264
)
(1,848
)
(22
)
Commodity contracts
(1,945
)
(576
)
—
29
39
—
—
(3
)
117
(2,339
)
(255
)
Credit derivatives
(1,001
)
(535
)
—
(43
)
91
5
—
2
540
(941
)
(197
)
Total trading derivatives, net
(4)
$
(4,753
)
$
(1,398
)
$
—
$
(18
)
$
706
$
307
$
—
$
(526
)
$
501
$
(5,181
)
$
(543
)
Investments
Mortgage-backed securities
U.S. government-sponsored agency guaranteed
$
101
$
—
$
15
$
1
$
(60
)
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
57
$
30
Residential
50
—
2
—
(47
)
—
—
(5
)
—
—
—
Commercial
—
—
—
3
—
8
—
(8
)
—
3
—
Total investment mortgage-backed securities
$
151
$
—
$
17
$
4
$
(107
)
$
8
$
—
$
(13
)
$
—
$
60
$
30
U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities
$
2
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
(2
)
$
—
$
—
$
—
State and municipal
1,211
—
37
70
(36
)
92
—
(102
)
—
1,272
35
Foreign government
186
—
(47
)
2
(37
)
455
—
(258
)
—
301
(5
)
Corporate
311
—
11
74
(6
)
224
—
(494
)
—
120
—
Equity securities
9
—
(1
)
—
—
—
—
(5
)
—
3
—
Asset-backed securities
660
—
(98
)
23
(20
)
864
—
(599
)
—
830
(134
)
Other debt securities
—
—
—
—
—
21
—
(11
)
—
10
—
Non-marketable equity securities
1,331
—
(124
)
2
—
10
—
(228
)
(162
)
829
49
Total investments
$
3,861
$
—
$
(205
)
$
175
$
(206
)
$
1,674
$
—
$
(1,712
)
$
(162
)
$
3,425
$
(25
)
178
Net realized/unrealized
gains (losses) incl. in
Transfers
Unrealized
gains
(losses)
still held
(3)
In millions of dollars
Dec. 31, 2016
Principal
transactions
Other
(1)(2)
into
Level 3
out of
Level 3
Purchases
Issuances
Sales
Settlements
Sept. 30, 2017
Loans
$
568
$
—
$
57
$
80
$
(16
)
$
173
$
—
$
(312
)
$
(6
)
$
544
$
266
Mortgage servicing rights
1,564
—
50
—
—
—
75
(1,046
)
(90
)
553
(40
)
Other financial assets measured on a recurring basis
34
—
(147
)
3
(8
)
1
303
(8
)
(164
)
14
(68
)
Liabilities
Interest-bearing deposits
$
293
$
—
$
9
$
40
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
(24
)
$
300
$
6
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned and sold under agreements to repurchase
849
7
—
—
—
—
—
—
(77
)
765
4
Trading account liabilities
Securities sold, not yet purchased
1,177
490
—
18
(53
)
—
—
265
(233
)
684
24
Short-term borrowings
42
18
—
4
(1
)
—
31
—
(2
)
56
7
Long-term debt
9,744
456
—
702
(1,457
)
—
2,701
—
87
11,321
708
Other financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis
8
—
—
—
—
—
3
(1
)
(8
)
2
(1
)
(1)
Changes in fair value of available-for-sale investments are recorded in AOCI, unless related to other-than-temporary impairment, while gains and losses from sales are recorded in
Realized gains (losses) from sales of investments
on the Consolidated Statement of Income.
(2)
Unrealized gains (losses) on MSRs are recorded in
Other revenue
on the Consolidated Statement of Income.
(3)
Represents the amount of total gains or losses for the period, included in earnings (and AOCI for changes in fair value of available-for-sale investments), attributable to the change in fair value relating to assets and liabilities classified as Level 3 that are still held at June 30, 2017.
(4)
Total Level 3 derivative assets and liabilities have been netted in these tables for presentation purposes only.
Level 3 Fair Value Rollforward
The following were the significant Level 3 transfers for the period December 31, 2017 to
September 30, 2018
:
•
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018, transfers of
Long-term debt
of
$0.4 billion
and
$2.2 billion
from Level 2 to Level 3, and of
$0.6 billion
and
$2.0 billion
from Level 3 to Level 2, mainly related to structured debt, reflecting changes in the significance of unobservable inputs as well as certain underlying market inputs becoming less or more observable.
The were no significant Level 3 transfers for the period from June 30, 2017 to
September 30, 2017
.
The following were the significant Level 3 transfers for the period December 31, 2016 to September 30, 2017:
•
Transfers of
Long-term debt
of
$0.7 billion
from Level 2 to Level 3, and of
$1.5 billion
from Level 3 to Level 2, mainly related to structured debt, reflecting changes in the significance of unobservable inputs as well as certain underlying market inputs becoming less or more observable.
179
Valuation Techniques and Inputs for Level 3 Fair Value Measurements
The following tables present the valuation techniques covering the majority of Level 3 inventory and the most significant unobservable inputs used in Level 3 fair value measurements. Differences between this table and amounts presented in the Level 3 Fair Value Rollforward table represent individually immaterial items that have been measured using a variety of valuation techniques other than those listed.
As of September 30, 2018
Fair value
(1)
(in millions)
Methodology
Input
Low
(2)(3)
High
(2)(3)
Weighted
average
(4)
Assets
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed and purchased under agreements to resell
$
65
Model-based
Interest rate
2.27
%
3.67
%
3.54
%
Mortgage-backed securities
$
273
Price-based
Price
$
37.40
$
108.00
$
92.56
137
Yield analysis
Yield
3.13
%
14.29
%
4.72
%
State and municipal, foreign government, corporate and other debt securities
$
930
Price-based
Price
$
—
$
108.15
$
79.65
926
Model-based
Credit spread
35 bps
446 bps
246 bps
Equity securities
(5)
$
124
Price-based
Price
$
—
$
865.86
$
3.50
46
Model-based
WAL
1.73 years
1.73 years
1.73 years
Asset-backed securities
$
1,666
Price-based
Price
$
3.56
$
100.91
$
69.41
Non-marketable equities
$
428
Comparables analysis
Net operating income multiple
$
7.30
$
25.00
$
10.49
$
282
Price-based
Discount to price
—
%
100.00
%
0.62
%
Derivatives—gross
(6)
Interest rate contracts (gross)
$
4,470
Model-based
Mean reversion
1.00
%
20.00
%
10.50
%
IR normal volatility
0.14
%
78.79
%
53.37
%
Inflation volatility
0.20
%
2.56
%
0.76
%
Foreign exchange contracts (gross)
$
749
Model-based
FX volatility
3.15
%
17.35
%
10.96
%
$
82
Cash flow
Credit spread
39 bps
880 bps
379 bps
IR-IR correlation
(51.00
)%
40.00
%
33.60
%
IR-FX correlation
40.00
%
60.00
%
50.00
%
FX rate
—
%
0.04
%
0.03
%
IR basis
(0.79
)%
9.00
%
0.67
%
Equity contracts (gross)
$
1,478
Model-based
Equity volatility
3.00
%
83.72
%
28.96
%
Forward price
63.10
%
159.10
%
97.77
%
WAL
1.73 years
1.73 years
1.73 years
Commodity and other contracts (gross)
$
3,049
Model-based
Forward price
45.19
%
549.00
%
129.77
%
Commodity volatility
7.60
%
55.00
%
17.32
%
Commodity Correlation
(52.45
)%
91.37
%
17.71
%
Credit derivatives (gross)
$
1,924
Model-based
Credit correlation
25.00
%
85.00
%
43.50
%
714
Price-based
Upfront points
5.13
%
97.98
%
53.49
%
Credit spread
2 bps
1,260 bps
84 bps
Price
$
31.77
$
98.00
$
79.28
Recovery rate
5.00
%
65.00
%
48.09
%
180
As of September 30, 2018
Fair value
(1)
(in millions)
Methodology
Input
Low
(2)(3)
High
(2)(3)
Weighted
average
(4)
Loans and leases
$
318
Model-based
Credit spread
128 bps
215 bps
161 bps
66
Price-based
Yield
4.15
%
4.15
%
4.15
%
Mortgage servicing rights
$
531
Cash flow
Yield
4.79
%
12.00
%
8.31
%
87
Model-based
WAL
4.11 years
8.10 years
6.92 years
Liabilities
Interest-bearing deposits
$
303
Model-based
Mean reversion
—
%
20.00
%
7.95
%
Forward price
99.23
%
106.69
%
101.80
%
Equity volatility
7.34
%
20.78
%
17.98
%
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned and sold under agreement to repurchase
$
997
Model-based
Interest rate
2.27
%
3.41
%
3.14
%
Trading account liabilities
Securities sold, not yet purchased
$
360
Model-based
Forward price
45.19
%
549.00
%
100.21
%
Equity volatility
3.00
%
83.72
%
22.17
%
Equity-equity correlation
(81.39
)%
100.00
%
41.02
%
Equity-FX correlation
(82.74
)%
54.00
%
(32.58
)%
Mean reversion
1.00
%
20.00
%
10.50
%
Short-term borrowings and long-term debt
$
12,944
Model-based
Mean reversion
1.00
%
20.00
%
10.50
%
Forward price
65.99
%
259.53
%
103.59
%
Equity volatility
3.00
%
83.72
%
19.28
%
As of December 31, 2017
Fair value
(1)
(in millions)
Methodology
Input
Low
(2)(3)
High
(2)(3)
Weighted
average
(4)
Assets
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed and purchased under agreements to resell
$
16
Model-based
Interest rate
1.43
%
2.16
%
2.09
%
Mortgage-backed securities
$
214
Price-based
Price
$
2.96
$
101.00
$
56.52
184
Yield analysis
Yield
2.52
%
14.06
%
5.97
%
State and municipal, foreign government, corporate and other debt securities
$
949
Model-based
Price
$
—
$
184.04
$
91.74
914
Price-based
Credit spread
35 bps
500 bps
249 bps
Yield
2.36
%
14.25
%
6.03
%
Equity securities
(5)
$
65
Price-based
Price
$
—
$
25,450.00
$
2,526.62
55
Model-based
WAL
2.50 years
2.50 years
2.50 years
Asset-backed securities
$
2,287
Price-based
Price
$
4.25
$
100.60
$
74.57
Non-marketable equity
$
423
Comparables analysis
EBITDA multiples
6.90
x
12.80
x
8.66
x
223
Price-based
Discount to price
—
%
100.00
%
11.83
%
Price-to-book ratio
0.05
x
1.00
x
0.32
x
Derivatives—gross
(6)
Interest rate contracts (gross)
$
3,818
Model-based
IR normal volatility
9.40
%
77.40
%
58.86
%
Mean reversion
1.00
%
20.00
%
10.50
%
Foreign exchange contracts (gross)
$
940
Model-based
Foreign exchange (FX) volatility
4.58
%
15.02
%
8.16
%
181
As of December 31, 2017
Fair value
(1)
(in millions)
Methodology
Input
Low
(2)(3)
High
(2)(3)
Weighted
average
(4)
Interest rate
(0.55
)%
0.28
%
0.04
%
IR-IR correlation
(51.00
)%
40.00
%
36.56
%
IR-FX correlation
(7.34
)%
60.00
%
49.04
%
Credit spread
11 bps
717 bps
173 bps
Equity contracts (gross)
(7)
$
2,897
Model-based
Equity volatility
3.00
%
68.93
%
24.66
%
Forward price
69.74
%
154.19
%
92.80
%
Commodity contracts (gross)
$
2,937
Model-based
Forward price
3.66
%
290.59
%
114.16
%
Commodity volatility
8.60
%
66.73
%
25.04
%
Commodity correlation
(37.64
)%
91.71
%
15.21
%
Credit derivatives (gross)
$
1,797
Model-based
Credit correlation
25.00
%
90.00
%
44.64
%
823
Price-based
Upfront points
6.03
%
97.26
%
62.88
%
Credit spread
3 bps
1,636 bps
173 bps
Price
$
1.00
$
100.24
$
57.63
Nontrading derivatives and other financial assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis (gross)
(6)
$
24
Model-based
Recovery rate
25.00
%
40.00
%
31.56
%
Redemption rate
10.72
%
99.50
%
74.24
%
Credit spread
38 bps
275 bps
127 bps
Upfront points
61.00
%
61.00
%
61.00
%
Loans and leases
$
391
Model-based
Equity volatility
3.00
%
68.93
%
22.52
%
148
Price-based
Credit spread
134 bps
500 bps
173 bps
Yield
3.09
%
4.40
%
3.13
%
Mortgage servicing rights
$
471
Cash flow
Yield
8.00
%
16.38
%
11.47
%
87
Model-based
WAL
3.83 years
6.89 years
5.93 years
Liabilities
Interest-bearing deposits
$
286
Model-based
Mean reversion
1.00
%
20.00
%
10.50
%
Forward price
99.56
%
99.95
%
99.72
%
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned and sold under agreements to repurchase
$
726
Model-based
Interest rate
1.43
%
2.16
%
2.09
%
Trading account liabilities
Securities sold, not yet purchased
$
21
Price-based
Price
$
1.00
$
287.64
$
88.19
Short-term borrowings and long-term debt
$
13,100
Model-based
Forward price
69.74
%
161.11
%
100.70
%
(1)
The fair value amounts presented in these tables represent the primary valuation technique or techniques for each class of assets or liabilities.
(2)
Some inputs are shown as zero due to rounding.
(3)
When the low and high inputs are the same, there is either a constant input applied to all positions, or the methodology involving the input applies to only one large position.
(4)
Weighted averages are calculated based on the fair values of the instruments.
(5)
For equity securities, the price inputs are expressed on an absolute basis, not as a percentage of the notional amount.
(6)
Both trading and nontrading account derivatives—assets and liabilities—are presented on a gross absolute value basis.
(7)
Includes hybrid products.
182
Items Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
Certain assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and therefore are not included in the tables above. These include assets measured at cost that have been written down to fair value during the periods as a result of an impairment. These also include non-marketable equity investments that have been measured using the measurement alternative and are either (i) written down to fair value during the periods as a result of an impairment or (ii) adjusted upward or downward to fair value as a result of a transaction observed during the periods for the identical or similar investment of the same issuer. In addition, these assets include loans held-for-sale and other real estate owned that are measured at the lower of cost or market value.
The following table presents the carrying amounts of all assets that were still held for which a nonrecurring fair value measurement was recorded:
In millions of dollars
Fair value
Level 2
Level 3
September 30, 2018
Loans HFS
(1)
$
4,823
$
1,870
$
2,953
Other real estate owned
85
68
17
Loans
(2)
349
155
194
Non-marketable equity investments measured using the measurement alternative
115
115
—
Total assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis
$
5,372
$
2,208
$
3,164
In millions of dollars
Fair value
Level 2
Level 3
December 31, 2017
Loans HFS
(1)
$
5,675
$
2,066
$
3,609
Other real estate owned
54
10
44
Loans
(2)
630
216
414
Total assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis
$
6,359
$
2,292
$
4,067
(1)
Net of fair value amounts on the unfunded portion of loans HFS recognized as
Other liabilities
on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
(2)
Represents impaired loans held for investment whose carrying amount is based on the fair value of the underlying collateral less costs to sell, primarily real estate.
183
Valuation Techniques and Inputs for Level 3 Nonrecurring Fair Value Measurements
The following table presents the valuation techniques covering the majority of Level 3 nonrecurring fair value measurements and the most significant unobservable inputs used in those measurements:
As of September 30, 2018
Fair value
(1)
(in millions)
Methodology
Input
Low
(2)
High
Weighted
average
(3)
Loans held-for-sale
$
2,533
Price-based
Price
$
80.90
$
100.00
$
99.26
Other real estate owned
$
17
Price-based
Appraised value
$
2,353,777
$
8,394,102
$
7,071,276
Discount to price
13.00
%
13.00
%
13.00
%
Price
$
56.31
$
56.31
$
56.31
Loans
(5)
$
123
Recovery analysis
Price
$
13.36
$
100.00
$
92.33
54
Price-based
Recovery rate
9.00
%
90.00
%
76.62
%
Appraised Value
$
9,855,140
$
55,972,000
$
38,154,269
As of December 31, 2017
Fair value
(1)
(in millions)
Methodology
Input
Low
(2)
High
Weighted
average
(3)
Loans held-for-sale
$
3,186
Price-based
Price
$
77.93
$
100.00
$
99.26
Other real estate owned
$
42
Price-based
Appraised value
(4)
$
20,278
$
8,091,760
$
4,016,665
Discount to price
(5)
34.00
%
34.00
%
34.00
%
Price
$
30.00
$
50.36
$
49.09
Loans
(6)
$
133
Price-based
Price
$
2.80
$
100.00
$
62.46
129
Cash flow
Recovery rate
50.00
%
100.00
%
63.59
%
127
Recovery analysis
Appraised value
$
—
$
45,500,000
$
38,785,667
(1)
The fair value amounts presented in this table represent the primary valuation technique or techniques for each class of assets or liabilities.
(2)
Some inputs are shown as zero due to rounding.
(3)
Weighted averages are calculated based on the fair values of the instruments.
(4)
Appraised values are disclosed in whole dollars.
(5)
Includes estimated costs to sell.
(6)
Represents impaired loans held for investment whose carrying amounts are based on the fair value of the underlying collateral, primarily real estate secured loans.
Nonrecurring Fair Value Changes
The following table presents total nonrecurring fair value measurements for the period, included in earnings, attributable to the change in fair value relating to assets that were still held:
Three Months Ended September 30,
In millions of dollars
2018
2017
Loans HFS
$
(1
)
$
10
Other real estate owned
(1
)
(4
)
Loans
(1)
(22
)
(66
)
Non-marketable equity investments measured using the measurement alternative
7
—
Total nonrecurring fair value
gains (losses)
$
(17
)
$
(60
)
(1)
Represents loans held for investment whose carrying amount is based on the fair value of the underlying collateral, primarily real estate.
Nine Months Ended September 30,
In millions of dollars
2018
2017
Loans HFS
$
8
$
(15
)
Other real estate owned
(2
)
(6
)
Loans
(1)
(51
)
(110
)
Non-marketable equity investments measured using the measurement alternative
111
—
Total nonrecurring fair value gains
(losses)
$
66
$
(131
)
(1)
Represents loans held for investment whose carrying amount is based on the fair value of the underlying collateral, primarily real estate.
184
Estimated Fair Value of Financial Instruments Not Carried at Fair Value
The following table presents the carrying value and fair value of Citigroup’s financial instruments that are not carried at fair value. The table below therefore excludes items measured at fair value on a recurring basis presented in the tables above.
September 30, 2018
Estimated fair value
Carrying
value
Estimated
fair value
In billions of dollars
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Assets
Investments
$
58.9
$
58.0
$
1.1
$
54.9
$
2.0
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed and purchased under agreements to resell
102.5
102.5
—
100.5
2.0
Loans
(1)(2)
656.7
655.2
—
5.2
650.0
Other financial assets
(2)(3)
263.9
264.4
184.6
14.7
65.1
Liabilities
Deposits
$
1,003.7
$
1,002.8
$
—
$
836.7
$
166.1
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase
127.8
127.8
—
127.8
—
Long-term debt
(4)
198.5
200.6
—
186.3
14.3
Other financial liabilities
(5)
110.6
110.6
—
16.1
94.5
December 31, 2017
Estimated fair value
Carrying
value
Estimated
fair value
In billions of dollars
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Assets
Investments
$
60.2
$
60.6
$
0.5
$
57.5
$
2.6
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed and purchased under agreements to resell
99.5
99.5
—
94.4
5.1
Loans
(1)(2)
648.6
644.9
—
6.0
638.9
Other financial assets
(2)(3)
242.6
243.0
166.4
14.1
62.5
Liabilities
Deposits
$
958.4
$
955.6
$
—
$
816.1
$
139.5
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase
115.6
115.6
—
115.6
—
Long-term debt
(4)
205.3
214.0
—
187.2
26.8
Other financial liabilities
(5)
129.9
129.9
—
15.5
114.4
(1)
The carrying value of loans is net of the
Allowance for loan losses
of $
12.3
billion for
September 30, 2018
and
$12.4 billion
for
December 31, 2017
. In addition, the carrying values exclude $
1.6
billion and
$1.7 billion
of lease finance receivables at
September 30, 2018
and
December 31, 2017
, respectively.
(2)
Includes items measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis.
(3)
Includes cash and due from banks, deposits with banks, brokerage receivables, reinsurance recoverables and other financial instruments included in
Other assets
on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, for all of which the carrying value is a reasonable estimate of fair value.
(4)
The carrying value includes long-term debt balances under qualifying fair value hedges.
(5)
Includes brokerage payables, separate and variable accounts, short-term borrowings (carried at cost) and other financial instruments included in
Other liabilities
on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, for all of which the carrying value is a reasonable estimate of fair value.
The estimated fair values of the Company’s corporate unfunded lending commitments at
September 30, 2018
and
December 31, 2017
were liabilities of $
3.2
billion, respectively, substantially all of which are classified as Level 3. The Company does not estimate the fair values of
consumer unfunded lending commitments, which are generally cancellable by providing notice to the borrower.
185
21. FAIR VALUE ELECTIONS
The Company may elect to report most financial instruments and certain other items at fair value on an instrument-by-instrument basis with changes in fair value reported in earnings, other than DVA (see below). The election is made upon the initial recognition of an eligible financial asset, financial liability or firm commitment or when certain specified reconsideration events occur. The fair value election may not be revoked once an election is made. The changes in
fair value are recorded in current earnings, other than DVA, which from January 1, 2016 are reported in AOCI. Additional discussion regarding the applicable areas in which fair value elections were made is presented in Note 20 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
The Company has elected fair value accounting for its mortgage servicing rights. See Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussions regarding the accounting and reporting of MSRs.
The following table presents the changes in fair value of those items for which the fair value option has been elected:
Changes in fair value—gains (losses)
Three Months Ended September 30,
Nine Months Ended September 30,
In millions of dollars
2018
2017
2018
2017
Assets
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed and purchased under agreements to resell
$
(17
)
$
(17
)
$
(14
)
$
(108
)
Trading account assets
3
581
(98
)
1,243
Investments
—
—
—
(3
)
Loans
Certain corporate loans
11
(61
)
(115
)
(42
)
Certain consumer loans
—
1
—
3
Total loans
$
11
$
(60
)
$
(115
)
$
(39
)
Other assets
MSRs
$
25
$
(6
)
$
82
$
50
Certain mortgage loans held-for-sale
(1)
9
34
21
115
Total other assets
$
34
$
28
$
103
$
165
Total assets
$
31
$
532
$
(124
)
$
1,258
Liabilities
Interest-bearing deposits
$
(20
)
$
(16
)
$
18
$
(60
)
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned and sold under agreements to repurchase
230
97
104
183
Trading account liabilities
25
19
4
70
Short-term borrowings
20
(30
)
138
(110
)
Long-term debt
(270
)
(510
)
1,269
(981
)
Total liabilities
$
(15
)
$
(440
)
$
1,533
$
(898
)
(1)
Includes gains (losses) associated with interest rate lock commitments for those loans that have been originated and elected under the fair value option.
186
Own Debt Valuation Adjustments (DVA)
Own debt valuation adjustments are recognized on Citi’s liabilities for which the fair value option has been elected using Citi’s credit spreads observed in the bond market. Effective January 1, 2016, changes in fair value of fair value option liabilities related to changes in Citigroup’s own credit spreads (DVA) are reflected as a component of AOCI; previously these amounts were recognized in Citigroup’s
Revenues
and
Net income
along with all other changes in fair value. See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
Among other variables, the fair value of liabilities for which the fair value option has been elected (other than non-recourse and similar liabilities) is impacted by the narrowing or widening of the Company’s credit spreads.
The estimated change in the fair value of these liabilities due to such changes in the Company’s own credit spread (or instrument-specific credit risk) was a loss of
$377 million
and a loss of
$195 million
for the
three months ended
September 30, 2018
and
2017
, and a gain of
$208 million
and a loss of
$422 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Changes in fair value resulting from changes in instrument-specific credit risk were estimated by incorporating the Company’s current credit spreads observable in the bond market into the relevant valuation technique used to value each liability as described above.
The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
Selected Portfolios of Securities Purchased Under Agreements to Resell, Securities Borrowed, Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase, Securities Loaned and Certain Non-Collateralized Short-Term Borrowings
The Company elected the fair value option for certain portfolios of fixed income securities purchased under agreements to resell and fixed income securities sold under agreements to repurchase, securities borrowed, securities loaned and certain non-collateralized short-term borrowings held primarily by broker-dealer entities in the United States, United Kingdom and Japan. In each case, the election was made because the related interest rate risk is managed on a portfolio basis, primarily with offsetting derivative instruments that are accounted for at fair value through earnings.
Changes in fair value for transactions in these portfolios are recorded in
Principal transactions
. The related interest revenue and interest expense are measured based on the contractual rates specified in the transactions and are reported as
Interest revenue
and
Interest expense
in the Consolidated Statement of Income.
Certain Loans and Other Credit Products
Citigroup has also elected the fair value option for certain other originated and purchased loans, including certain unfunded loan products, such as guarantees and letters of credit, executed by Citigroup’s lending and trading businesses. None of these credit products are highly leveraged financing commitments. Significant groups of transactions include loans and unfunded loan products that are expected to be either sold or securitized in the near term, or transactions where the economic risks are hedged with derivative instruments, such as purchased credit default swaps or total return swaps where the Company pays the total return on the underlying loans to a third party. Citigroup has elected the fair value option to mitigate accounting mismatches in cases where hedge accounting is complex and to achieve operational simplifications. Fair value was not elected for most lending transactions across the Company.
The following table provides information about certain credit products carried at fair value:
September 30, 2018
December 31, 2017
In millions of dollars
Trading assets
Loans
Trading assets
Loans
Carrying amount reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheet
$
8,922
$
4,239
$
8,851
$
4,374
Aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of (less than) fair value
432
538
623
682
Balance of non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due
—
1
—
1
Aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due
—
—
—
1
187
In addition to the amounts reported above, $
1,043 million
and $
508 million
of unfunded commitments related to certain credit products selected for fair value accounting were outstanding as of
September 30, 2018
and
December 31, 2017
, respectively.
Changes in the fair value of funded and unfunded credit products are classified in
Principal transactions
in Citi’s Consolidated Statement of Income. Related interest revenue is measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as
Interest revenue
on
Trading account assets
or loan interest depending on the balance sheet classifications of the credit products. The changes in fair value for the nine months ended
September 30, 2018
and
2017
due to instrument-specific credit risk totaled to a loss of $
13 million
and a gain of $
57 million
, respectively.
Certain Investments in Unallocated Precious Metals
Citigroup invests in unallocated precious metals accounts (gold, silver, platinum and palladium) as part of its commodity and foreign currency trading activities or to economically hedge certain exposures from issuing structured liabilities. Under ASC 815, the investment is bifurcated into a debt host contract and a commodity forward derivative instrument. Citigroup elects the fair value option for the debt host contract, and reports the debt host contract within
Trading account assets
on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet. The total carrying amount of debt host contracts across unallocated precious metals accounts was approximately $
0.4 billion
and $
0.9 billion
at
September 30, 2018
and
December 31, 2017
, respectively. The amounts are expected to fluctuate based on trading activity in future periods.
As part of its commodity and foreign currency trading activities, Citi trades unallocated precious metals investments and executes forward purchase and forward sale derivative contracts with trading counterparties. When Citi sells an unallocated precious metals investment, Citi’s receivable from its depository bank is repaid and Citi derecognizes its investment in the unallocated precious metal. The forward purchase or sale contract with the trading counterparty indexed to unallocated precious metals is accounted for as a derivative, at fair value through earnings. As of
September 30, 2018
, there were approximately $
12.0 billion
and $
10.6 billion
of notional amounts of such forward purchase and forward sale derivative contracts outstanding, respectively.
Certain Investments in Private Equity and Real Estate Ventures and Certain Equity Method and Other Investments
Citigroup invests in private equity and real estate ventures for the purpose of earning investment returns and for capital appreciation. The Company has elected the fair value option for certain of these ventures, because such investments are considered similar to many private equity or hedge fund activities in Citi’s investment companies, which are reported at fair value. The fair value option brings consistency in the accounting and evaluation of these investments. All investments (debt and equity) in such private equity and real estate entities are accounted for at fair value. These investments are classified as
Investments
on Citigroup’s Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Changes in the fair values of these investments are classified in
Other revenue
in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Income.
Citigroup also elected the fair value option for certain non-marketable equity securities, whose risk is managed with derivative instruments that are accounted for at fair value through earnings. These securities are classified as
Trading account assets
on Citigroup’s Consolidated Balance Sheet. Changes in the fair value of these securities and the related derivative instruments are recorded in
Principal transactions
. Effective January 1, 2018, under ASU 2016-01 and ASU 2018-03, a fair value option election is no longer required to measure these non-marketable equity securities at fair value through earnings. See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details.
Certain Mortgage Loans Held-for-Sale (HFS)
Citigroup has elected the fair value option for certain purchased and originated prime fixed-rate and conforming adjustable-rate first mortgage loans HFS. These loans are intended for sale or securitization and are hedged with derivative instruments. The Company has elected the fair value option to mitigate accounting mismatches in cases where hedge accounting is complex and to achieve operational simplifications.
The following table provides information about certain mortgage loans HFS carried at fair value:
In millions of dollars
September 30,
2018
December 31, 2017
Carrying amount reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheet
$
480
$
426
Aggregate fair value in excess of (less than) unpaid principal balance
9
14
Balance of non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due
—
—
Aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due
—
—
188
The changes in the fair values of these mortgage loans are reported in
Other revenue
in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Income. There was no net change in fair value during the
nine months ended
September 30, 2018
and
2017
due to instrument-specific credit risk. Related interest income continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as
Interest revenue
in the Consolidated Statement of Income.
Certain Structured Liabilities
The Company has elected the fair value option for certain structured liabilities whose performance is linked to structured interest rates, inflation, currency, equity, referenced credit or commodity risks. The Company elected the fair value option because these exposures are considered to be trading-related positions and, therefore, are managed on a fair value basis. These positions will continue to be classified as debt, deposits or derivatives (
Trading account liabilities
) on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet according to their legal form.
The following table provides information about the carrying value of structured notes, disaggregated by type of embedded derivative instrument:
In billions of dollars
September 30, 2018
December 31, 2017
Interest rate linked
$
16.8
$
13.9
Foreign exchange linked
0.4
0.3
Equity linked
15.2
13.0
Commodity linked
0.2
0.2
Credit linked
1.4
1.9
Total
$
34.0
$
29.3
Prior to 2016, the total change in the fair value of these structured liabilities was reported in
Principal transactions
in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Income. Beginning in the first quarter of 2016, the portion of the changes in fair value attributable to changes in Citigroup’s own credit spreads (DVA) is reflected as a component of AOCI while all other changes in fair value will continue to be reported in
Principal transactions
. Changes in the fair value of these structured liabilities include accrued interest, which is also included in the change in fair value reported in
Principal transactions
.
Certain Non-Structured Liabilities
The Company has elected the fair value option for certain non-structured liabilities with fixed and floating interest rates. The Company has elected the fair value option where the interest rate risk of such liabilities may be economically hedged with derivative contracts or the proceeds are used to purchase financial assets that will also be accounted for at fair value through earnings. The elections have been made to mitigate accounting mismatches and to achieve operational simplifications. These positions are reported in
Short-term borrowings
and
Long-term debt
on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet. Prior to 2016, the total change in the fair value of these non-structured liabilities was reported in
Principal transactions
in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Income. Beginning in the first quarter of 2016, the portion of the changes in fair value attributable to changes in Citigroup’s own credit spreads (DVA) is reflected as a component of AOCI while all other changes in fair value will continue to be reported in
Principal transactions
.
Interest expense on non-structured liabilities is measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as
Interest expense
in the Consolidated Statement of Income.
The following table provides information about long-term debt carried at fair value:
In millions of dollars
September 30, 2018
December 31, 2017
Carrying amount reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheet
$
36,772
$
31,392
Aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of (less than) fair value
1,967
(579
)
The following table provides information about short-term borrowings carried at fair value:
In millions of dollars
September 30, 2018
December 31, 2017
Carrying amount reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheet
$
5,042
$
4,627
Aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value
781
74
189
22. GUARANTEES AND COMMITMENTS
Citi provides a variety of guarantees and indemnifications to its customers to enhance their credit standing and enable them to complete a wide variety of business transactions. For
certain contracts meeting the definition of a guarantee, the guarantor must recognize, at inception, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee.
In addition, the guarantor must disclose the maximum potential amount of future payments that the guarantor could be required to make under the guarantee, if there were a total
default by the guaranteed parties. The determination of the maximum potential future payments is based on the notional amount of the guarantees without consideration of possible
recoveries under recourse provisions or from collateral held or pledged. As such, Citi believes such amounts bear no relationship to the anticipated losses, if any, on these guarantees.
For additional information regarding Citi’s guarantees and indemnifications included in the tables below, as well as its other guarantees and indemnifications excluded from the tables below, see Note 26 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Citi’s
2017
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The following tables present information about Citi’s guarantees at
September 30, 2018
and
December 31, 2017
:
Maximum potential amount of future payments
In billions of dollars at September 30, 2018 except carrying value in millions
Expire within
1 year
Expire after
1 year
Total amount
outstanding
Carrying value
(in millions of dollars)
Financial standby letters of credit
$
29.9
$
65.5
$
95.4
$
165
Performance guarantees
7.8
4.0
11.8
30
Derivative instruments considered to be guarantees
21.2
84.5
105.7
307
Loans sold with recourse
—
1.4
1.4
9
Securities lending indemnifications
(1)
120.5
—
120.5
—
Credit card merchant processing
(1)(2)
95.5
—
95.5
—
Credit card arrangements with partners
—
1.1
1.1
162
Custody indemnifications and other
—
38.6
38.6
62
Total
$
274.9
$
195.1
$
470.0
$
735
Maximum potential amount of future payments
In billions of dollars at December 31, 2017 except carrying value in millions
Expire within
1 year
Expire after
1 year
Total amount
outstanding
Carrying value
(
in millions of dollars)
Financial standby letters of credit
$
27.9
$
65.9
$
93.8
$
93
Performance guarantees
7.2
4.1
11.3
20
Derivative instruments considered to be guarantees
11.0
84.9
95.9
423
Loans sold with recourse
—
1.4
1.4
9
Securities lending indemnifications
(1)
103.7
—
103.7
—
Credit card merchant processing
(1)(2)
85.5
—
85.5
—
Credit card arrangements with partners
0.3
1.1
1.4
205
Custody indemnifications and other
—
36.0
36.0
59
Total
$
235.6
$
193.4
$
429.0
$
809
(1)
The carrying values of securities lending indemnifications and credit card merchant processing were not material for either period presented, as the probability of potential liabilities arising from these guarantees is minimal.
(2)
At
September 30, 2018
and December 31,
2017
, this maximum potential exposure was estimated to be
$96 billion
and
$86 billion
, respectively. However, Citi believes that the maximum exposure is not representative of the actual potential loss exposure based on its historical experience. This contingent liability is unlikely to arise, as most products and services are delivered when purchased and amounts are refunded when items are returned to merchants.
190
Loans sold with recourse
Loans sold with recourse represent Citi’s obligations to
reimburse the buyers for loan losses under certain
circumstances. Recourse refers to the clause in a sales
agreement under which a seller/lender will fully reimburse
the buyer/investor for any losses resulting from the
purchased loans. This may be accomplished by the seller
taking back any loans that become delinquent.
In addition to the amounts shown in the tables above,
Citi has recorded a repurchase reserve for its potential
repurchases or make-whole liability regarding residential
mortgage representation and warranty claims related to its
whole loan sales to U.S. government-sponsored
enterprises (GSEs) and, to a lesser extent, private investors.
The repurchase reserve was approximately
$54 million
and
$66 million
at
September 30, 2018
and
December 31, 2017
, respectively, and these amounts are included in
Other liabilities
on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Credit card arrangements with partners
Citi, in certain of its credit card partner arrangements,
provides guarantees to the partner regarding the volume of
certain customer originations during the term of the
agreement. To the extent such origination targets are not met,
the guarantees serve to compensate the partner for certain
payments that otherwise would have been generated in
connection with such originations.
Other guarantees and indemnifications
Credit Card Protection Programs
Citi, through its credit card businesses, provides various
cardholder protection programs on several of its card
products, including programs that provide insurance
coverage for rental cars, coverage for certain losses
associated with purchased products, price protection for
certain purchases and protection for lost luggage. These
guarantees are not included in the table, since the total
outstanding amount of the guarantees and Citi’s maximum
exposure to loss cannot be quantified. The protection is
limited to certain types of purchases and losses, and it is not
possible to quantify the purchases that would qualify for
these benefits at any given time. Citi assesses the probability
and amount of its potential liability related to these programs
based on the extent and nature of its historical loss
experience. At
September 30, 2018
and
December 31, 2017
, the actual and estimated losses incurred and the carrying value of Citi’s obligations related to these programs were
immaterial.
Value-Transfer Networks
Citi is a member of, or shareholder in, hundreds of value-transfer networks (VTNs) (payment, clearing and settlement
systems as well as exchanges) around the world. As a
condition of membership, many of these VTNs require that
members stand ready to pay a pro rata share of the losses
incurred by the organization due to another member’s default
on its obligations. Citi’s potential obligations may be limited
to its membership interests in the VTNs, contributions to the
VTN’s funds, or, in limited cases, the obligation may be unlimited. The maximum exposure cannot be estimated as
this would require an assessment of claims that have
not yet occurred. Citi believes the risk of loss is remote
given historical experience with the VTNs. Accordingly,
Citi’s participation in VTNs is not reported in the guarantees
tables above, and there are no amounts reflected on the
Consolidated Balance Sheet as of
September 30, 2018
or
December 31, 2017
for potential obligations that could arise
from Citi’s involvement with VTN associations.
Long-Term Care Insurance Indemnification
In 2000, Travelers Life & Annuity (Travelers), then a subsidiary of Citi, entered into a reinsurance agreement to transfer the risks and rewards of its long-term care (LTC) business to GE Life (now Genworth Financial Inc., or Genworth), then a subsidiary of the General Electric Company (GE). As part of this transaction, the reinsurance obligations were provided by two regulated insurance subsidiaries of GE Life, which funded
two
collateral trusts with securities. Presently, as discussed below, the trusts are referred to as the Genworth Trusts.
As part of GE’s spin-off of Genworth in 2004, GE retained the risks and rewards associated with the 2000 Travelers reinsurance agreement by providing a reinsurance contract to Genworth through its Union Fidelity Life Insurance Company (UFLIC) subsidiary that covers the Travelers LTC policies. In addition, GE provided a capital maintenance agreement in favor of UFLIC that is designed to assure that UFLIC will have the funds to pay its reinsurance obligations. As a result of these reinsurance agreements and the spin-off of Genworth, Genworth has reinsurance protection from UFLIC (supported by GE) and has reinsurance obligations in connection with the Travelers LTC policies. As noted below, the Genworth reinsurance obligations now benefit Brighthouse Financial, Inc. (Brighthouse). While neither Brighthouse nor Citi are direct beneficiaries of the capital maintenance agreement between GE and UFLIC, Brighthouse and Citi benefit indirectly from the existence of the capital maintenance agreement, which helps assure that UFLIC will continue to have funds necessary to pay its reinsurance obligations to Genworth.
In connection with Citi’s 2005 sale of Travelers to MetLife Inc. (MetLife), Citi provided an indemnification to MetLife for losses (including policyholder claims) relating to the LTC business for the entire term of the Travelers LTC policies, which, as noted above, are reinsured by subsidiaries of Genworth. In 2017, MetLife spun off its retail insurance business to Brighthouse. As a result, the Travelers LTC policies now reside with Brighthouse. The original reinsurance agreement between Travelers (now Brighthouse) and Genworth remains in place and Brighthouse is the sole beneficiary of the Genworth Trusts. The fair value of the Genworth Trusts is approximately
$7.4 billion
as of
September 30, 2018
, compared to
$7.5 billion
at
December 31, 2017
. The Genworth Trusts are designed to provide collateral to Brighthouse in an amount equal to the statutory liabilities of Brighthouse in respect of the Travelers LTC policies. The assets in the Genworth Trusts are
191
evaluated and adjusted periodically to ensure that the fair value of the assets continues to provide collateral in an amount equal to these estimated statutory liabilities, as the liabilities change over time.
If both (i) Genworth fails to perform under the original
Travelers/GE Life reinsurance agreement for any reason,
including insolvency or the failure of UFLIC to perform in a timely manner, and (ii) the assets of the
two
Genworth Trusts
are insufficient or unavailable, then Citi, through its LTC
reinsurance indemnification, must reimburse Brighthouse for
any losses incurred in connection with the LTC policies. Since both events would have to occur before Citi would become responsible for any payment to Brighthouse pursuant to its indemnification obligation, and the likelihood of such events occurring is currently not probable, there is
no
liability reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of
September 30, 2018
and
December 31, 2017
related to this indemnification. Citi continues to closely monitor its potential exposure under this indemnification obligation.
Separately, Genworth announced that it had agreed to
be purchased by China Oceanwide Holdings Co., Ltd, subject to a series of conditions and regulatory approvals. Citi is monitoring these developments.
Futures and over-the-counter derivatives clearing
Citi provides clearing services on central clearing parties (CCP) for clients that need to clear exchange-traded and over-the-counter (OTC) derivative contracts with CCPs. Based on all relevant facts and circumstances, Citi has concluded that it acts as an agent for accounting purposes in its role as clearing member for these client transactions. As such, Citi does not reflect the underlying exchange-traded or OTC derivatives contracts in its Consolidated Financial Statements. See Note 19 for a discussion of Citi’s derivatives activities that are reflected in its Consolidated Financial Statements.
As a clearing member, Citi collects and remits cash and securities collateral (margin) between its clients and the
respective CCP. In certain circumstances, Citi collects a higher amount of cash (or securities) from its clients than it needs to remit to the CCPs. This excess cash is then held at depository institutions such as banks or carry brokers.
There are two types of margin: initial and variation. Where Citi obtains benefits from or controls cash initial margin (e.g., retains an interest spread), cash initial margin collected from clients and remitted to the CCP or depository institutions is reflected within
Brokerage payables
(payables to customers) and
Brokerage receivables
(receivables from brokers, dealers and clearing organizations) or
Cash and due from banks
, respectively.
However, for exchange-traded and OTC-cleared derivative contracts where Citi does not obtain benefits from or control the client cash balances, the client cash initial margin collected from clients and remitted to the CCP or depository institutions is not reflected on Citi’s Consolidated Balance Sheet. These conditions are met when Citi has contractually agreed with the client that (i) Citi will pass through to the client all interest paid by the CCP or depository institutions on the cash initial margin, (ii) Citi
will not utilize its right as a clearing member to transform cash margin into other assets, (iii) Citi does not guarantee and is not liable to the client for the performance of the CCP or the depository institution and (iv) the client cash balances are legally isolated from Citi’s bankruptcy estate. The total amount of cash initial margin collected and remitted in this manner was approximately
$13.2 billion
and
$10.7 billion
as of
September 30, 2018
and
December 31, 2017
, respectively.
Variation margin due from clients to the respective CCP, or from the CCP to clients, reflects changes in the value of the client’s derivative contracts for each trading day. As a clearing member, Citi is exposed to the risk of non-performance by clients (e.g., failure of a client to post
variation margin to the CCP for negative changes in the
value of the client’s derivative contracts). In the event of
non-performance by a client, Citi would move to close out
the client’s positions. The CCP would typically utilize initial
margin posted by the client and held by the CCP, with any
remaining shortfalls required to be paid by Citi as clearing
member. Citi generally holds incremental cash or securities
margin posted by the client, which would typically be
expected to be sufficient to mitigate Citi’s credit risk in the
event the client fails to perform.
As required by ASC 860-30-25-5, securities collateral posted by clients is not recognized on Citi’s Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Carrying Value—Guarantees and Indemnifications
At
September 30, 2018
and
December 31, 2017
, the total carrying amounts of the liabilities related to the guarantees and indemnifications included in the tables above amounted
to approximately
$0.7 billion
and
$0.8 billion
. The carrying value of financial and performance guarantees is included in
Other liabilities
. For loans sold with recourse, the carrying value of the liability is included in
Other liabilities
.
Collateral
Cash collateral available to Citi to reimburse losses realized under these guarantees and indemnifications amounted to
$51 billion
and
$46 billion
at
September 30, 2018
and
December 31, 2017
, respectively. Securities and other marketable assets held as collateral amounted to
$82 billion
and
$70 billion
at
September 30, 2018
and
December 31, 2017
, respectively. The majority of collateral is held to reimburse losses realized under securities lending indemnifications. Additionally, letters of credit in favor of Citi held as collateral amounted to
$3.9 billion
and
$3.7 billion
at
September 30, 2018
and
December 31, 2017
, respectively. Other property may also be available to Citi to cover losses under certain guarantees and indemnifications; however, the value of such property has not been determined.
192
Performance risk
Presented in the tables below are the maximum potential amounts of future payments that are classified based upon internal and external credit ratings. The determination of the maximum potential future payments is based on the notional amount of the guarantees without consideration of possible recoveries under recourse provisions or from collateral held or pledged. As such, Citi believes such amounts bear no relationship to the anticipated losses, if any, on these guarantees.
Maximum potential amount of future payments
In billions of dollars at September 30, 2018
Investment
grade
Non-investment
grade
Not
rated
Total
Financial standby letters of credit
$
68.0
$
11.4
$
16.0
$
95.4
Performance guarantees
8.6
2.2
1.0
11.8
Derivative instruments deemed to be guarantees
—
—
105.7
105.7
Loans sold with recourse
—
—
1.4
1.4
Securities lending indemnifications
—
—
120.5
120.5
Credit card merchant processing
—
—
95.5
95.5
Credit card arrangements with partners
—
—
1.1
1.1
Custody indemnifications and other
25.7
12.9
—
38.6
Total
$
102.3
$
26.5
$
341.2
$
470.0
Maximum potential amount of future payments
In billions of dollars at December 31, 2017
Investment
grade
Non-investment
grade
Not
rated
Total
Financial standby letters of credit
$
68.1
$
10.9
$
14.8
$
93.8
Performance guarantees
7.9
2.4
1.0
11.3
Derivative instruments deemed to be guarantees
—
—
95.9
95.9
Loans sold with recourse
—
—
1.4
1.4
Securities lending indemnifications
—
—
103.7
103.7
Credit card merchant processing
—
—
85.5
85.5
Credit card arrangements with partners
—
—
1.4
1.4
Custody indemnifications and other
23.7
12.3
—
36.0
Total
$
99.7
$
25.6
$
303.7
$
429.0
193
Credit Commitments and Lines of Credit
The table below summarizes Citigroup’s credit commitments:
In millions of dollars
U.S.
Outside of
U.S.
September 30,
2018
December 31,
2017
Commercial and similar letters of credit
$
798
$
4,290
$
5,088
$
5,000
One- to four-family residential mortgages
1,199
1,709
2,908
2,674
Revolving open-end loans secured by one- to four-family residential properties
10,212
1,391
11,603
12,323
Commercial real estate, construction and land development
12,175
1,971
14,146
11,151
Credit card lines
605,614
94,646
700,260
678,300
Commercial and other consumer loan commitments
199,722
107,517
307,239
272,655
Other commitments and contingencies
3,165
516
3,681
3,071
Total
$
832,885
$
212,040
$
1,044,925
$
985,174
The majority of unused commitments are contingent upon customers maintaining specific credit standards.
Commercial commitments generally have floating interest rates and fixed expiration dates and may require payment of fees. Such fees (net of certain direct costs) are deferred and, upon exercise of the commitment, amortized over the life of
the loan or, if exercise is deemed remote, amortized over the commitment period.
Other commitments and contingencies
Other commitments and contingencies include all other transactions related to commitments and contingencies not reported on the lines above.
Unsettled reverse repurchase and securities borrowing agreements and unsettled repurchase and securities lending agreements
In addition, in the normal course of business, Citigroup enters into reverse repurchase and securities borrowing agreements, as well as repurchase and securities lending agreements, which settle at a future date. At September 30, 2018, and December 31, 2017, Citigroup had
$54.1 billion
and
$35.0 billion
of unsettled reverse repurchase and securities borrowing agreements, respectively, and
$43.0 billion
and
$19.1 billion
of unsettled repurchase and securities lending agreements, respectively. For a further discussion of securities purchased under agreements to resell and securities borrowed, and securities sold under agreements to repurchase and securities loaned, including the Company’s policy for offsetting repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements, see Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Restricted Cash
Citigroup defines restricted cash (as cash subject to withdrawal restrictions) to include cash deposited with central banks that must be maintained to meet minimum regulatory requirements, and cash set aside for the benefit of customers or for other purposes such as compensating balance arrangements or debt retirement. Restricted cash includes minimum reserve requirements with the Federal
Reserve Bank and certain other central banks and cash segregated to satisfy rules regarding the protection of customer assets as required by Citigroup broker-dealers’ primary regulators, including the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Commodities Futures Trading Commission and the United Kingdom’s Prudential Regulation Authority.
Restricted cash is included on the Consolidated Balance Sheet within the following balance sheet lines:
In millions of dollars
September 30,
2018
December 31,
2017
Cash and due from banks
$
3,488
$
3,151
Deposits with banks
24,106
27,664
Total
$
27,594
$
30,815
194
23. CONTINGENCIES
The following information supplements and amends, as applicable, the disclosures in Note 23 to the Consolidated Financial Statements of Citigroup’s First Quarter of 2018 Form 10-Q and Second Quarter of 2018 Form 10-Q and Note 27 to the Consolidated Financial Statements of Citigroup’s 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K. For purposes of this Note, Citigroup, its affiliates and subsidiaries and current and former officers, directors and employees, are sometimes collectively referred to as Citigroup and Related Parties.
In accordance with ASC 450, Citigroup establishes accruals for contingencies, including the litigation and regulatory matters disclosed herein, when Citigroup believes it is probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Once established, accruals are adjusted from time to time, as appropriate, in light of additional information. The amount of loss ultimately incurred in relation to those matters may be substantially higher or lower than the amounts accrued for those matters.
If Citigroup has not accrued for a matter because the matter does not meet the criteria for accrual (as set forth above), or Citigroup believes an exposure to loss exists in excess of the amount accrued for a particular matter, in each case assuming a material loss is reasonably possible, Citigroup discloses the matter. In addition, for such matters, Citigroup discloses an estimate of the aggregate reasonably possible loss or range of loss in excess of the amounts accrued for those matters as to which an estimate can be made. At September 30, 2018, Citigroup’s estimate of the reasonably possible unaccrued loss for these matters was materially unchanged from the estimate of approximately
$1.0 billion
in the aggregate as of June 30, 2018.
As available information changes, the matters for which Citigroup is able to estimate will change, and the estimates themselves will change. In addition, while many estimates presented in financial statements and other financial disclosures involve significant judgment and may be subject to significant uncertainty, estimates of the range of reasonably possible loss arising from litigation and regulatory proceedings are subject to particular uncertainties. For example, at the time of making an estimate, Citigroup may have only preliminary, incomplete or inaccurate information about the facts underlying the claim; its assumptions about the future rulings of the court or other tribunal on significant issues, or the behavior and incentives of adverse parties or regulators, may prove to be wrong; and the outcomes it is attempting to predict are often not amenable to the use of statistical or other quantitative analytical tools. In addition, from time to time an outcome may occur that Citigroup had not accounted for in its estimates because it had deemed such an outcome to be remote. For all these reasons, the amount of loss in excess of accruals ultimately incurred for the matters as to which an estimate has been made could be substantially higher or lower than the range of loss included in the estimate.
Subject to the foregoing, it is the opinion of Citigroup's management, based on current knowledge and after taking into account its current legal accruals, that the eventual outcome of all matters described in this Note would not be likely to have a
material adverse effect on the consolidated financial condition of Citigroup. Nonetheless, given the substantial or indeterminate amounts sought in certain of these matters and the inherent unpredictability of such matters, an adverse outcome in certain of these matters could, from time to time, have a material adverse effect on Citigroup’s consolidated results of operations or cash flows in particular quarterly or annual periods.
For further information on ASC 450 and Citigroup's accounting and disclosure framework for contingencies, including for litigation and regulatory matters disclosed herein, see Note 27 to the Consolidated Financial Statements of Citigroup’s 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Depositary Receipts Matters
Regulatory Actions
: The SEC’s Division of Enforcement has been investigating depositary banks and broker-dealers, including Citigroup and Related Parties, in connection with activity relating to pre-released American Depositary Receipts from 2011 to 2015. Citi has been in active discussions with the SEC about a potential resolution of the investigation.
Other Litigation
:
On August 20, 2018, plaintiffs filed a motion for preliminary approval of a class action settlement, which the court subsequently granted. A hearing for final approval of the settlement is scheduled for December 21, 2018. Additional information concerning this action is publicly available in court filings under the docket number 15 Civ. 9185 (S.D.N.Y.) (McMahon, C.).
Foreign Exchange Matters
Antitrust and Other Litigation
: On August 6, 2018, in IN RE
FOREIGN EXCHANGE BENCHMARK RATES
ANTITRUST LITIGATION, the court granted plaintiffs’ motion for final approval of the proposed class settlements with Citigroup, Citibank, Citicorp, and Citigroup Global Markets Inc. (CGMI), and certain other defendants. Additional information concerning this action is publicly available in court filings under the docket number 13 Civ. 7789 (S.D.N.Y.) (Schofield, J.).
On June 20, 2018, in NYPL v. JPMORGAN CHASE & CO., ET AL., the court denied plaintiffs’ request to expand their class to include credit card, wire and ATM transactions with a foreign currency exchange component. On September 6, 2018, the court denied plaintiffs’ motion for reconsideration. Additional information concerning this action is publicly available in court filings under the docket numbers 15 Civ. 2290 (N.D. Cal.) (Chhabria, J.) and 15 Civ. 9300 (S.D.N.Y.) (Schofield, J.).
On August 21, 2018, in CONTANT, ET AL. v. BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL., plaintiffs moved for preliminary approval of a proposed class settlement with Citigroup, Citibank, Citicorp and CGMI. Additional information concerning this action is publicly available in court filings under the docket number 17 Civ. 3139 (S.D.N.Y.) (Schofield, J.).
195
Interbank Offered Rates-Related Litigation and Other Matters
Antitrust and Other Litigation
: On July 19, 2018, in IN RE LIBOR-BASED FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS ANTITRUST LITIGATION, the court granted preliminary approval of the settlement between a putative class of plaintiffs (lending institutions with interests in loans tied to USD LIBOR) and Citigroup and Citibank.
On August 1, 2018, the court granted final approval of the settlement between the largest plaintiffs’ class (investors who purchased over-the-counter derivatives from USD LIBOR panel banks) and Citigroup and Citibank.
On September 8, 2018, a putative class of plaintiffs (investors who transacted in Eurodollar futures or options on exchanges) filed motions for approval of a settlement with Citigroup, Citibank, CGMI and other settling defendants.
Additional information concerning these actions and related actions and appeals is publicly available in court filings under the docket numbers 11 MD 2262 (S.D.N.Y.) (Buchwald, J.) and 16-1189 (2d Cir.).
On October 4, 2018, in FRONTPOINT ASIAN EVENT DRIVEN FUND, LTD., ET AL. v. CITIBANK, N.A., ET AL., the court allowed FrontPoint Asian Event Driven Fund, Ltd.’s antitrust claim and claim for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing based on transactions linked to the Singapore dollar Singapore Interbank Offered Rate to proceed. The court also dismissed Sonterra Capital Master Fund, Ltd.’s antitrust claims and both named plaintiffs’ RICO claims in their entirety. Additional information concerning this action is publicly available in court filings under the docket number 16 Civ. 5263 (S.D.N.Y.) (Hellerstein, J.).
Interchange Fee Litigation
On September 18, 2018, the plaintiffs purporting to act on behalf of the putative class primarily seeking damages (the Damages Class) moved for preliminary approval of a proposed amended settlement agreement that supersedes the original settlement agreement as of October 19, 2012 to resolve claims of the Damages Class in IN RE PAYMENT CARD INTERCHANGE FEE AND MERCHANT DISCOUNT ANTITRUST LITIGATION. Additional information regarding this matter is publicly available under the docket number MDL 05-1720 (E.D.N.Y.) (Brodie, J.).
Interest Rate Swaps Matters
Antitrust and Other Litigation
:
On August 7, 2018, in TRUEEX LLC v. BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL., plaintiff filed an amended complaint. On August 28, 2018, defendants moved to dismiss the amended complaint. Additional information concerning this action is publicly available in court filings under the docket numbers 18-CV-5361 (S.D.N.Y.) (Engelmayer, J.) and 16-MDL-2704 (S.D.N.Y.) (Engelmayer, J.).
Oceanografía Fraud and Related Matters
Other Litigation
: On September 28, 2018, in the action commenced by Oceanografia and its former controlling shareholder, Amado Yáñez Osuna, the court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss with prejudice as to the breach of contract claim and without prejudice as to the remaining claims for malicious prosecution, tortious interference with contract and fraud on forum non conveniens grounds. Additional information concerning this action is publicly available in court filings under the docket number 1:17-cv-01434 (S.D.N.Y.) (Sullivan, J.).
Sovereign Securities Matters
Antitrust and Other Litigation
:
On August 24, 2018, the court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss consolidated putative class action complaints related to the supranational, sub-sovereign and agency (SSA) bond market. Plaintiffs may file a second amended complaint by November 6, 2018.
Additional information relating to this action is publicly available in court filings under the docket number 16 Civ. 3711 (S.D.N.Y.) (Ramos, J.).
On September 17, 2018, in IN RE MEXICAN GOVERNMENT BONDS ANTITRUST LITIGATION, defendants moved to dismiss the consolidated amended complaint. Additional information concerning this action is publicly available in court filings under the docket number 18 Civ. 2830 (S.D.N.Y.) (Oetken, J.).
Settlement Payments
Payments required in settlement agreements described above have been made or are covered by existing litigation accruals.
196
24. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Citigroup amended its Registration Statement on Form S-3 on file with the SEC (File No. 33-192302) to add its wholly owned subsidiary, Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc. (CGMHI), as a co-registrant. Any securities issued by CGMHI under the Form S-3 will be fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Citigroup.
The following are the Condensed Consolidating Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2018
and
2017
, Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet as of
September 30, 2018
and
December 31, 2017
and Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows for the nine months ended
September 30, 2018
and
2017
for Citigroup Inc., the parent holding company (Citigroup parent company), CGMHI, other Citigroup subsidiaries and eliminations and total consolidating adjustments. “Other Citigroup subsidiaries and eliminations” includes all other subsidiaries of Citigroup, intercompany eliminations and income (loss) from discontinued operations. “Consolidating adjustments” includes Citigroup parent company elimination of distributed and undistributed income of subsidiaries and investment in subsidiaries.
These Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements have been prepared and presented in accordance with SEC Regulation S-X Rule 3-10, “Financial Statements of Guarantors and Issuers of Guaranteed Securities Registered or Being Registered.”
These Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements are presented for purposes of additional analysis, but should be considered in relation to the Consolidated Financial Statements of Citigroup taken as a whole.
197
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income
Three Months Ended September 30, 2018
In millions of dollars
Citigroup parent company
CGMHI
Other Citigroup subsidiaries and eliminations
Consolidating adjustments
Citigroup consolidated
Revenues
Dividends from subsidiaries
$
7,948
$
—
$
—
$
(7,948
)
$
—
Interest revenue
1
2,291
15,878
—
18,170
Interest revenue—intercompany
1,281
424
(1,705
)
—
—
Interest expense
1,068
1,405
3,895
—
6,368
Interest expense—intercompany
492
899
(1,391
)
—
—
Net interest revenue
$
(278
)
$
411
$
11,669
$
—
$
11,802
Commissions and fees
$
—
$
1,194
$
1,609
$
—
$
2,803
Commissions and fees—intercompany
—
72
(72
)
—
—
Principal transactions
(100
)
581
2,085
—
2,566
Principal transactions—intercompany
(303
)
(10
)
313
—
—
Other income
266
325
627
—
1,218
Other income—intercompany
(46
)
57
(11
)
—
—
Total non-interest revenues
$
(183
)
$
2,219
$
4,551
$
—
$
6,587
Total revenues, net of interest expense
$
7,487
$
2,630
$
16,220
$
(7,948
)
$
18,389
Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims
$
—
$
3
$
1,971
$
—
$
1,974
Operating expenses
Compensation and benefits
$
14
$
1,148
$
4,157
$
—
$
5,319
Compensation and benefits—intercompany
19
—
(19
)
—
—
Other operating
(201
)
558
4,635
—
4,992
Other operating—intercompany
13
564
(577
)
—
—
Total operating expenses
$
(155
)
$
2,270
$
8,196
$
—
$
10,311
Equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries
$
(3,098
)
$
—
$
—
$
3,098
$
—
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
$
4,544
$
357
$
6,053
$
(4,850
)
$
6,104
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
(78
)
169
1,380
—
1,471
Income (loss) from continuing operations
$
4,622
$
188
$
4,673
$
(4,850
)
$
4,633
Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes
—
—
(8
)
—
(8
)
Net income before attribution of noncontrolling interests
$
4,622
$
188
$
4,665
$
(4,850
)
$
4,625
Noncontrolling interests
—
—
3
—
3
Net income (loss)
$
4,622
$
188
$
4,662
$
(4,850
)
$
4,622
Comprehensive income
Add: Other comprehensive income (loss)
$
(1,151
)
$
(196
)
$
(458
)
$
654
$
(1,151
)
Total Citigroup comprehensive income (loss)
$
3,471
$
(8
)
$
4,204
$
(4,196
)
$
3,471
Add: Other comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests
$
—
$
—
$
8
$
—
$
8
Add: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
—
—
3
—
3
Total comprehensive income (loss)
$
3,471
$
(8
)
$
4,215
$
(4,196
)
$
3,482
198
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income
Three Months Ended September 30, 2017
In millions of dollars
Citigroup parent company
CGMHI
Other Citigroup subsidiaries and eliminations
Consolidating adjustments
Citigroup consolidated
Revenues
Dividends from subsidiaries
$
5,360
$
—
$
—
$
(5,360
)
$
—
Interest revenue
—
1,442
14,472
—
15,914
Interest revenue—intercompany
1,040
313
(1,353
)
—
—
Interest expense
1,195
643
2,541
—
4,379
Interest expense—intercompany
240
580
(820
)
—
—
Net interest revenue
$
(395
)
$
532
$
11,398
$
—
$
11,535
Commissions and fees
$
—
$
1,262
$
1,979
$
—
$
3,241
Commissions and fees—intercompany
—
13
(13
)
—
—
Principal transactions
610
501
1,137
—
2,248
Principal transactions—intercompany
168
(401
)
233
—
—
Other income
(860
)
729
1,526
—
1,395
Other income—intercompany
32
153
(185
)
—
—
Total non-interest revenues
$
(50
)
$
2,257
$
4,677
$
—
$
6,884
Total revenues, net of interest expense
$
4,915
$
2,789
$
16,075
$
(5,360
)
$
18,419
Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims
$
—
$
(1
)
$
2,000
$
—
$
1,999
Operating expenses
Compensation and benefits
$
(3
)
$
1,104
$
4,203
$
—
$
5,304
Compensation and benefits—intercompany
46
—
(46
)
—
—
Other operating
(18
)
560
4,571
—
5,113
Other operating—intercompany
8
310
(318
)
—
—
Total operating expenses
$
33
$
1,974
$
8,410
$
—
$
10,417
Equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries
$
(1,015
)
$
—
$
—
$
1,015
$
—
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income
taxes
$
3,867
$
816
$
5,665
$
(4,345
)
$
6,003
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
(266
)
—
324
1,808
—
1,866
Income (loss) from continuing operations
$
4,133
$
492
$
3,857
$
(4,345
)
$
4,137
Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes
—
—
(5
)
—
(5
)
Net income (loss) before attribution of noncontrolling interests
$
4,133
$
492
$
3,852
$
(4,345
)
$
4,132
Noncontrolling interests
—
—
(1
)
—
(1
)
Net income (loss)
$
4,133
$
492
$
3,853
$
(4,345
)
$
4,133
Comprehensive income
Add: Other comprehensive income (loss)
$
8
$
(84
)
$
(762
)
$
846
$
8
Total Citigroup comprehensive income (loss)
$
4,141
$
408
$
3,091
$
(3,499
)
$
4,141
Add: Other comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests
$
—
$
—
—
$
12
$
—
$
12
Add: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
—
—
—
(1
)
—
(1
)
Total comprehensive income (loss)
$
4,141
$
408
$
3,102
$
(3,499
)
$
4,152
199
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018
In millions of dollars
Citigroup parent company
CGMHI
Other Citigroup subsidiaries and eliminations
Consolidating adjustments
Citigroup consolidated
Revenues
Dividends from subsidiaries
$
16,648
$
—
$
—
$
(16,648
)
$
—
Interest revenue
67
6,344
45,641
—
52,052
Interest revenue—intercompany
3,636
1,206
(4,842
)
—
—
Interest expense
3,119
3,732
10,562
—
17,413
Interest expense—intercompany
1,467
2,567
(4,034
)
—
—
Net interest revenue
$
(883
)
$
1,251
$
34,271
$
—
$
34,639
Commissions and fees
$
—
$
3,793
$
5,151
$
—
$
8,944
Commissions and fees—intercompany
(1
)
163
(162
)
—
—
Principal transactions
(275
)
805
7,476
—
8,006
Principal transactions—intercompany
(1,161
)
1,461
(300
)
—
—
Other income
817
666
2,658
—
4,141
Other income—intercompany
(111
)
88
23
—
—
Total non-interest revenues
$
(731
)
$
6,976
$
14,846
$
—
$
21,091
Total revenues, net of interest expense
$
15,034
$
8,227
$
49,117
$
(16,648
)
$
55,730
Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims
$
—
$
(21
)
$
5,664
$
—
$
5,643
Operating expenses
Compensation and benefits
$
149
$
3,695
$
12,734
$
—
$
16,578
Compensation and benefits—intercompany
82
—
(82
)
—
—
Other operating
(210
)
1,684
13,896
—
15,370
Other operating—intercompany
38
1,835
(1,873
)
—
—
Total operating expenses
$
59
$
7,214
$
24,675
$
—
$
31,948
Equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries
$
(2,060
)
$
—
$
—
$
2,060
$
—
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
$
12,915
$
1,034
$
18,778
$
(14,588
)
$
18,139
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
(817
)
853
4,320
—
4,356
Income (loss) from continuing operations
$
13,732
$
181
$
14,458
$
(14,588
)
$
13,783
Net income (loss) before attribution of noncontrolling interests
$
13,732
$
181
$
14,458
$
(14,588
)
$
13,783
Noncontrolling interests
—
—
51
—
51
Net income (loss)
$
13,732
$
181
$
14,407
$
(14,588
)
$
13,732
Comprehensive income
Add: Other comprehensive income (loss)
$
(3,974
)
$
(186
)
$
1,787
$
(1,601
)
$
(3,974
)
Total Citigroup comprehensive income (loss)
$
9,758
$
(5
)
$
16,194
$
(16,189
)
$
9,758
Add: Other comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests
$
—
$
—
$
(35
)
$
—
$
(35
)
Add: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
—
—
51
—
51
Total comprehensive income (loss)
$
9,758
$
(5
)
$
16,210
$
(16,189
)
$
9,774
200
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017
In millions of dollars
Citigroup parent company
CGMHI
Other Citigroup subsidiaries and eliminations
Consolidating adjustments
Citigroup consolidated
Revenues
Dividends from subsidiaries
$
11,625
$
—
$
—
$
(11,625
)
$
—
Interest revenue
—
3,873
41,856
—
45,729
Interest revenue—intercompany
2,909
847
(3,756
)
—
—
Interest expense
3,549
1,578
6,854
—
11,981
Interest expense—intercompany
593
1,666
(2,259
)
—
—
Net interest revenue
$
(1,233
)
$
1,476
$
33,505
$
—
$
33,748
Commissions and fees
$
—
$
3,933
$
5,619
$
—
$
9,552
Commissions and fees—intercompany
(1
)
123
(122
)
—
—
Principal transactions
1,569
2,377
4,039
—
7,985
Principal transactions—intercompany
768
(207
)
(561
)
—
—
Other income
(2,500
)
868
5,287
—
3,655
Other income—intercompany
70
156
(226
)
—
—
Total non-interest revenues
$
(94
)
$
7,250
$
14,036
$
—
$
21,192
Total revenues, net of interest expense
$
10,298
$
8,726
$
47,541
$
(11,625
)
$
54,940
Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims
$
—
$
—
$
5,378
$
—
$
5,378
Operating expenses
Compensation and benefits
$
(18
)
$
3,578
$
12,741
$
—
$
16,301
Compensation and benefits—intercompany
97
—
(97
)
—
—
Other operating
(334
)
1,605
14,328
—
15,599
Other operating—intercompany
(41
)
1,633
(1,592
)
—
—
Total operating expenses
$
(296
)
$
6,816
$
25,380
$
—
$
31,900
Equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries
$
755
$
—
$
—
$
(755
)
$
—
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
$
11,349
$
1,910
$
16,783
$
(12,380
)
$
17,662
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
(746
)
800
5,470
—
5,524
Income (loss) from continuing operations
$
12,095
$
1,110
$
11,313
$
(12,380
)
$
12,138
Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes
—
—
(2
)
—
(2
)
Net income (loss) before attribution of noncontrolling interests
$
12,095
$
1,110
$
11,311
$
(12,380
)
$
12,136
Noncontrolling interests
—
—
41
—
41
Net income (loss)
$
12,095
$
1,110
$
11,270
$
(12,380
)
$
12,095
Comprehensive income
Add: Other comprehensive income (loss)
$
1,986
$
(142
)
$
(4,638
)
$
4,780
$
1,986
Total Citigroup comprehensive income (loss)
$
14,081
$
968
$
6,632
$
(7,600
)
$
14,081
Add: Other comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests
$
—
$
—
$
82
$
—
$
82
Add: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
—
—
41
—
41
Total comprehensive income (loss)
$
14,081
$
968
$
6,755
$
(7,600
)
$
14,204
201
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
September 30, 2018
In millions of dollars
Citigroup parent company
CGMHI
Other Citigroup subsidiaries and eliminations
Consolidating adjustments
Citigroup consolidated
Assets
Cash and due from banks
$
1
$
543
$
25,183
$
—
$
25,727
Cash and due from banks—intercompany
17
2,104
(2,121
)
—
—
Deposits with banks
—
3,302
170,257
—
173,559
Deposits with banks—intercompany
3,000
6,386
(9,386
)
—
—
Federal funds sold and resale agreements
—
227,147
53,794
—
280,941
Federal funds sold and resale agreements—intercompany
—
19,572
(19,572
)
—
—
Trading account assets
258
144,440
112,804
—
257,502
Trading account assets—intercompany
963
2,934
(3,897
)
—
—
Investments
7
215
345,291
—
345,513
Loans, net of unearned income
—
1,518
673,391
—
674,909
Loans, net of unearned income—intercompany
—
—
—
—
—
Allowance for loan losses
—
—
(12,336
)
—
(12,336
)
Total loans, net
$
—
$
1,518
$
661,055
$
—
$
662,573
Advances to subsidiaries
$
146,339
$
—
$
(146,339
)
$
—
$
—
Investments in subsidiaries
203,896
—
—
(203,896
)
—
Other assets
(1)
12,517
67,087
99,746
—
179,350
Other assets—intercompany
3,638
45,654
(49,292
)
—
—
Total assets
$
370,636
$
520,902
$
1,237,523
$
(203,896
)
$
1,925,165
Liabilities and equity
Deposits
$
—
$
—
$
1,005,176
$
—
$
1,005,176
Deposits—intercompany
—
—
—
—
—
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned and sold
—
154,341
21,574
—
175,915
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned and sold—intercompany
—
34,948
(34,948
)
—
—
Trading account liabilities
16
94,163
53,473
—
147,652
Trading account liabilities—intercompany
448
3,143
(3,591
)
—
—
Short-term borrowings
254
4,358
29,158
—
33,770
Short-term borrowings—intercompany
—
18,100
(18,100
)
—
—
Long-term debt
148,183
24,324
62,763
—
235,270
Long-term debt—intercompany
—
65,811
(65,811
)
—
—
Advances from subsidiaries
21,965
—
(21,965
)
—
—
Other liabilities
2,440
73,178
53,901
—
129,519
Other liabilities—intercompany
326
16,369
(16,695
)
—
—
Stockholders’ equity
197,004
32,167
172,588
(203,896
)
197,863
Total liabilities and equity
$
370,636
$
520,902
$
1,237,523
$
(203,896
)
$
1,925,165
(1)
Other assets
for Citigroup parent company at
September 30, 2018
included $
30.9 billion
of placements to Citibank and its branches, of which $
18.1 billion
had a remaining term of less than 30 days.
202
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
December 31, 2017
In millions of dollars
Citigroup parent company
CGMHI
Other Citigroup subsidiaries and eliminations
Consolidating adjustments
Citigroup consolidated
Assets
Cash and due from banks
$
—
$
378
$
23,397
$
—
$
23,775
Cash and due from banks—intercompany
13
3,750
(3,763
)
—
—
Deposits with banks
—
3,348
153,393
—
156,741
Deposits with banks—intercompany
11,000
5,219
(16,219
)
—
—
Federal funds sold and resale agreements
—
182,685
49,793
—
232,478
Federal funds sold and resale agreements—intercompany
—
16,091
(16,091
)
—
—
Trading account assets
—
139,462
113,328
—
252,790
Trading account assets—intercompany
38
2,711
(2,749
)
—
—
Investments
27
181
352,082
—
352,290
Loans, net of unearned income
—
900
666,134
—
667,034
Loans, net of unearned income—intercompany
—
—
—
—
—
Allowance for loan losses
—
—
(12,355
)
—
(12,355
)
Total loans, net
$
—
$
900
$
653,779
$
—
$
654,679
Advances to subsidiaries
$
139,722
$
—
$
(139,722
)
$
—
$
—
Investments in subsidiaries
210,537
—
—
(210,537
)
—
Other assets
(1)
10,844
58,299
100,569
—
169,712
Other assets—intercompany
3,428
43,613
(47,041
)
—
—
Total assets
$
375,609
$
456,637
$
1,220,756
$
(210,537
)
$
1,842,465
Liabilities and equity
Deposits
$
—
$
—
$
959,822
$
—
$
959,822
Deposits—intercompany
—
—
—
—
—
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned and sold
—
134,888
21,389
—
156,277
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned and sold—intercompany
—
18,597
(18,597
)
—
—
Trading account liabilities
—
80,801
44,369
—
125,170
Trading account liabilities—intercompany
15
2,182
(2,197
)
—
—
Short-term borrowings
251
3,568
40,633
—
44,452
Short-term borrowings—intercompany
—
32,871
(32,871
)
—
—
Long-term debt
152,163
18,048
66,498
—
236,709
Long-term debt—intercompany
—
60,765
(60,765
)
—
—
Advances from subsidiaries
19,136
—
(19,136
)
—
—
Other liabilities
2,673
62,113
53,577
—
118,363
Other liabilities—intercompany
631
9,753
(10,384
)
—
—
Stockholders’ equity
200,740
33,051
178,418
(210,537
)
201,672
Total liabilities and equity
$
375,609
$
456,637
$
1,220,756
$
(210,537
)
$
1,842,465
(1)
Other assets
for Citigroup parent company at
December 31, 2017
included
$29.7 billion
of placements to Citibank and its branches, of which
$18.9 billion
had a remaining term of less than 30 days.
203
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018
In millions of dollars
Citigroup parent company
CGMHI
Other Citigroup subsidiaries and eliminations
Consolidating adjustments
Citigroup consolidated
Net cash provided by operating activities of continuing operations
$
12,581
$
16,232
$
1,253
$
—
$
30,066
Cash flows from investing activities of continuing operations
Purchases of investments
$
(7,955
)
$
(18
)
$
(121,081
)
$
—
$
(129,054
)
Proceeds from sales of investments
7,634
3
44,533
—
52,170
Proceeds from maturities of investments
—
—
82,940
—
82,940
Change in loans
—
—
(16,131
)
—
(16,131
)
Proceeds from sales and securitizations of loans
—
—
4,021
—
4,021
Proceeds from significant disposals
—
—
314
—
314
Change in federal funds sold and resales
—
(47,943
)
(519
)
—
(48,462
)
Changes in investments and advances—intercompany
(7,769
)
(2,338
)
10,107
—
—
Other investing activities
214
(41
)
(2,534
)
—
(2,361
)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities of continuing operations
$
(7,876
)
$
(50,337
)
$
1,650
$
—
$
(56,563
)
Cash flows from financing activities of continuing operations
Dividends paid
$
(3,616
)
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
(3,616
)
Redemption of preferred stock
(218
)
—
—
—
(218
)
Treasury stock acquired
(9,848
)
—
—
—
(9,848
)
Proceeds (repayments) from issuance of long-term debt, net
(883
)
7,538
(829
)
—
5,826
Proceeds (repayments) from issuance of long-term debt—intercompany, net
—
5,048
(5,048
)
—
—
Change in deposits
—
—
45,354
—
45,354
Change in federal funds purchased and repos
—
35,804
(16,166
)
—
19,638
Change in short-term borrowings
32
790
(11,503
)
—
(10,681
)
Net change in short-term borrowings and other advances—intercompany
2,312
(14,771
)
12,459
—
—
Capital contributions from (to) parent
—
(663
)
663
—
—
Other financing activities
(479
)
—
—
—
(479
)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities of continuing operations
$
(12,700
)
$
33,746
$
24,930
$
—
$
45,976
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and due from banks
$
—
$
—
$
(709
)
$
—
$
(709
)
Change in cash and due from banks and deposits with banks
$
(7,995
)
$
(359
)
$
27,124
$
—
$
18,770
Cash and due from banks and deposits with banks at beginning of period
11,013
12,695
156,808
—
180,516
Cash and due from banks and deposits with banks at end of period
$
3,018
$
12,336
$
183,932
$
—
$
199,286
Cash and due from banks
$
18
$
2,648
$
23,061
$
—
$
25,727
Deposits with banks
3,000
9,688
160,871
—
173,559
Cash and due from banks and deposits with banks at end of period
$
3,018
$
12,336
$
183,932
$
—
$
199,286
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information for continuing operations
Cash paid during the year for income taxes
$
873
$
138
$
2,250
$
—
$
3,261
Cash paid during the year for interest
2,870
6,045
7,363
—
16,278
Non-cash investing activities
Transfers to loans HFS from loans
$
—
$
—
$
3,300
$
—
$
3,300
Transfers to OREO and other repossessed assets
—
—
94
—
94
204
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017
In millions of dollars
Citigroup parent company
CGMHI
Other Citigroup subsidiaries and eliminations
Consolidating adjustments
Citigroup consolidated
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities of continuing operations
$
5,712
$
(15,236
)
$
6,063
$
—
$
(3,461
)
Cash flows from investing activities of continuing operations
Purchases of investments
$
—
$
—
$
(151,362
)
$
—
$
(151,362
)
Proceeds from sales of investments
132
—
89,592
—
89,724
Proceeds from maturities of investments
—
—
67,166
—
67,166
Change in loans
—
—
(41,569
)
—
(41,569
)
Proceeds from sales and securitizations of loans
—
—
7,019
—
7,019
Proceeds from significant disposals
—
—
3,411
—
3,411
Change in federal funds sold and resales
—
(8,840
)
(6,955
)
—
(15,795
)
Changes in investments and advances—intercompany
13,269
(5,439
)
(7,830
)
—
—
Other investing activities
—
—
(2,054
)
—
(2,054
)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities of continuing operations
$
13,401
$
(14,279
)
$
(42,582
)
$
—
$
(43,460
)
Cash flows from financing activities of continuing operations
Dividends paid
$
(2,639
)
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
(2,639
)
Treasury stock acquired
(9,071
)
—
—
—
(9,071
)
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt, net
6,665
4,385
11,458
—
22,508
Proceeds (repayments) from issuance of long-term debt—intercompany, net
—
(1,300
)
1,300
—
—
Change in deposits
—
—
34,632
—
34,632
Change in federal funds purchased and repos
—
6,910
12,551
—
19,461
Change in short-term borrowings
44
1,865
5,539
—
7,448
Net change in short-term borrowings and other advances—intercompany
(23,342
)
6,573
16,769
—
—
Capital contributions from parent
—
(60
)
60
—
—
Other financing activities
(402
)
—
—
—
(402
)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities of continuing operations
$
(28,745
)
$
18,373
$
82,309
$
—
$
71,937
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and due from banks
$
—
$
—
$
599
$
—
$
599
Change in cash and due from banks and deposits with banks
$
(9,632
)
$
(11,142
)
$
46,389
$
—
$
25,615
Cash and due from banks and deposits with banks at beginning of period
20,811
25,118
114,565
—
160,494
Cash and due from banks and deposits with banks at end of period
$
11,179
$
13,976
$
160,954
$
—
$
186,109
Cash and due from banks
$
179
$
4,519
$
17,906
$
—
$
22,604
Deposits with banks
11,000
9,457
143,048
—
163,505
Cash and due from banks and deposits with banks at end of period
$
11,179
$
13,976
$
160,954
$
—
$
186,109
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information for continuing operations
Cash paid (received) during the year for income taxes
$
(772
)
$
470
$
3,016
$
—
$
2,714
Cash paid during the year for interest
3,319
3,175
5,110
—
11,604
Non-cash investing activities
Transfers to loans HFS from loans
$
—
$
—
$
3,800
$
—
$
3,800
Transfers to OREO and other repossessed assets
—
—
85
—
85
205
UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES, PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND DIVIDENDS
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities
None.
Equity Security Repurchases
The following table summarizes Citi’s equity security repurchases, which consisted entirely of common stock repurchases:
In millions, except per share amounts
Total shares
purchased
Average
price paid
per share
Approximate dollar
value of shares that
may yet be purchased
under the plan or
programs
July 2018
Open market repurchases
(1)
21.0
$
69.06
$
16,146
Employee transactions
(2)
—
—
N/A
August 2018
Open market repurchases
(1)
30.0
71.05
14,018
Employee transactions
(2)
—
—
N/A
September 2018
Open market repurchases
(1)
23.6
71.62
12,330
Employee transactions
(2)
—
—
N/A
Total for 3Q18 and remaining program balance as of September 30, 2018
74.6
$
70.67
$
12,330
(1)
Represents repurchases under the $17.6 billion 2018 common stock repurchase program (2018 Repurchase Program) that was approved by Citigroup’s Board of Directors and announced on June 28, 2018. The 2018 Repurchase Program was part of the planned capital actions included by Citi in its 2018 Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR). The 2018 Repurchase Program expires on June 30, 2019. Shares repurchased under the 2018 Repurchase Program were added to treasury stock.
(2)
Consisted of shares added to treasury stock related to (i) certain activity on employee stock option program exercises where the employee delivers existing shares to cover the option exercise, or (ii) under Citi’s employee restricted share awards where shares are withheld to satisfy tax requirements.
N/A Not applicable
Dividends
In addition to Board of Directors’ approval, Citi’s ability to pay common stock dividends substantially depends on regulatory approval, including an annual regulatory review of the results of the CCAR process required by the Federal Reserve Board and the supervisory stress tests required under the Dodd-Frank Act. For additional information regarding Citi’s capital planning and stress testing, see “Capital Resources—Current Regulatory Capital Standards” and “Regulatory Capital Standards Developments” above and “Risk Factors—Strategic Risks” and “Stress Testing Component on Capital Planning” in Citi’s
2017
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
For information on the ability of Citigroup’s subsidiary depository institutions to pay dividends, see Note 18 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements in Citi’s
2017
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
206
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on the 30th day of October,
2018
.
CITIGROUP INC.
(Registrant)
By
/s/ John C. Gerspach
John C. Gerspach
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
By
/s/ Raja J. Akram
Raja J. Akram
Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
207
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit
Number
Description of Exhibit
3.01
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, as in effect on the date hereof, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.01 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2018 (File No. 1-9924).
31.01+
Certification of principal executive officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.02+
Certification of principal financial officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.01+
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.01+
Financial statements from the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2018, filed on October 30, 2018, formatted in XBRL: (i) the Consolidated Statement of Income, (ii) the Consolidated Balance Sheet, (iii) the Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity, (iv) the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows and (v) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
The total amount of securities authorized pursuant to any instrument defining rights of holders of long-term debt of the Company does not exceed 10% of the total assets of the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries. The Company will furnish copies of any such instrument to the SEC upon request.
* Denotes a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
+ Filed herewith.
208