Citigroup
C
#80
Rank
$208.95 B
Marketcap
$116.78
Share price
1.45%
Change (1 day)
48.84%
Change (1 year)

Citigroup - 10-Q quarterly report FY2010 Q2


Text size:

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010

Commission file number 1-9924

Citigroup Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
  52-1568099
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

399 Park Avenue, New York, NY
(Address of principal executive offices)

 

10043
(Zip code)

(212) 559-1000
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý    No o

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý    No o

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ý Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller
reporting company)
 Smaller reporting company o

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o    No  ý

        Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock as of the latest practicable date:

Common stock outstanding as of July 31, 2010: 28,973,528,780

Available on the web at www.citigroup.com


Table of Contents

1


CITIGROUP INC.

SECOND QUARTER 2010—FORM 10-Q

OVERVIEW

  3 

CITIGROUP SEGMENTS AND REGIONS

  
4
 

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

  
5
 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

  
5
 

Overview of Results

  
5
 

SUMMARY OF SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

  
8
 

SEGMENT, BUSINESS AND PRODUCT—INCOME (LOSS) AND REVENUES

  
10
 
 

Citigroup Income (Loss)

  
10
 
 

Citigroup Revenues

  
11
 

CITICORP

  
12
 
 

Regional Consumer Banking

  
13
 
  

North America Regional Consumer Banking

  
14
 
  

EMEA Regional Consumer Banking

  
16
 
  

Latin America Regional Consumer Banking

  
18
 
  

Asia Regional Consumer Banking

  
20
 
 

Institutional Clients Group

  
22
 
  

Securities and Banking

  
23
 
  

Transaction Services

  
25
 

CITI HOLDINGS

  
26
 
 

Brokerage and Asset Management

  
27
 
 

Local Consumer Lending

  
28
 
 

Special Asset Pool

  
30
 

CORPORATE/OTHER

  
33
 

SEGMENT BALANCE SHEET

  
34
 

CAPITAL RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY

  
35
 
  

Capital Resources

  
35
 
  

Funding and Liquidity

  
40
 

OFF-BALANCE-SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

  
43
 

MANAGING GLOBAL RISK

  
44
 
  

Credit Risk

  
44
 
    

Loan and Credit Overview

  
44
 
    

Loans Outstanding

  
45
 
    

Details of Credit Loss Experience

  
50
 
    

Non-Accrual Assets

  
51
 
    

Consumer Loan Details

  
56
 
     

Consumer Loan Delinquency Amounts and Ratios

  
56
 
     

Consumer Loan Net Credit Losses and Ratios

  
57
 
     

Consumer Loan Modification Programs

  
58
 
    

U.S. Consumer Mortgage Lending

  
62
 
    

Corporate Credit Portfolio

  
71
 
  

Market Risk

  
74
 
    

Average Rates—Interest Revenue, Interest Expense, and Net Interest Margin

  
76
 
    

Average Balances and Interest Rates—Assets

  
77
 
    

Average Balances and Interest Rates—Liabilities and Equity, and Net Interest Revenue

  
78
 
    

Analysis of Changes in Interest Revenue

  
81
 
    

Analysis of Changes in Interest Expense and Net Interest Revenue

  
82
 
  

Cross-Border Risk

  
84
 

DERIVATIVES

  
85
 

INCOME TAXES

  
87
 

RECLASSIFICATION OF HELD-TO-MATURITY (HTM) SECURITIES TO AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE (AFS)

  
88
 

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

  
88
 

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

  
88
 

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

  
89
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS FOR FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES

  
90
 

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

  
92
 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

  
101
 

OTHER INFORMATION

    
  

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

  
197
 
  

Item 1A. Risk Factors

  
199
 
  

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

  
200
 
  

Item 6. Exhibits

  
201
 
  

Signatures

  
202
 
  

Exhibit Index

  
203
 

2


Table of Contents


OVERVIEW

Introduction

        Citigroup's history dates back to the founding of Citibank in 1812. Citigroup's original corporate predecessor was incorporated in 1988 under the laws of the State of Delaware. Following a series of transactions over a number of years, Citigroup Inc. was formed in 1998 upon the merger of Citicorp and Travelers Group Inc.

        Citigroup is a global diversified financial services holding company whose businesses provide consumers, corporations, governments and institutions with a broad range of financial products and services. Citi has approximately 200 million customer accounts and does business in more than 160 countries and jurisidictions.

        Citigroup currently operates, for management reporting purposes, via two primary business segments: Citicorp, consisting of our Regional Consumer Banking businesses and Institutional Clients Group; and Citi Holdings, consisting of our Brokerage and Asset Management and Local Consumer Lending businesses, and a Special Asset Pool. There is also a third segment, Corporate/Other. For a further description of the business segments and the products and services they provide, see "Citigroup Segments" below, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

        Throughout this report, "Citigroup" and "Citi" refer to Citigroup Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.

        This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with Citigroup's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K), Citigroup's updated 2009 historical financial statements and notes filed on Form 8-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on June 25, 2010 and Citigroup's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010. Additional information about Citigroup is available on the company's Web site at www.citigroup.com. Citigroup's recent annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, as well as its other filings with the SEC are available free of charge through the company's Web site by clicking on the "Investors" page and selecting "All SEC Filings." The SEC's Web site also contains periodic and current reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding Citi, at www.sec.gov.

        Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior periods' financial statements to conform to the current period's presentation.

        Within this Form 10-Q, please refer to the tables of contents on pages 2 and 126 for page references to Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, respectively.

Impact of Adoption of SFAS 166/167

        Effective January 1, 2010, Citigroup adopted Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 860, Transfers and Servicing, formerly SFAS No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140 (SFAS 166), and ASC 810, Consolidations, formerly SFAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (SFAS 167). Among other requirements, the adoption of these standards includes the requirement that Citi consolidate certain of its credit card securitization trusts and eliminate sale accounting for transfers of credit card receivables to those trusts. As a result, reported and managed-basis presentations are comparable for periods beginning January 1, 2010. For comparison purposes, prior period revenues, net credit losses, provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims and loans are presented on a managed basis in this Form 10-Q. Managed presentations were applicable only to Citi's North American branded and retail partner credit card operations in North America Regional Consumer Banking and Citi Holdings—Local Consumer Lending and any aggregations in which they are included. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Executive Summary," "Capital Resources and Liquidity" and Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for an additional discussion of the adoption of SFAS 166/167 and its impact on Citigroup.

3


Table of Contents

As described above, Citigroup is managed pursuant to the following segments:

GRAPHIC

        The following are the four regions in which Citigroup operates. The regional results are fully reflected in the segment results above.

GRAPHIC


(1)
Asia includes Japan, Latin America includes Mexico, and North America comprises the U.S., Canada and Puerto Rico.

4


Table of Contents


MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

SECOND QUARTER 2010 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Overview of Results

        During the second quarter of 2010, Citigroup continued its focus on (i) building and maintaining its financial strength, including maintaining its capital, liquidity and continued expense discipline, (ii) winding down Citi Holdings as quickly as practicable in an economically rational manner, and (iii) its core assets and businesses in Citicorp.

        For the quarter, Citigroup reported net income of $2.7 billion, or $0.09 per diluted share. Second quarter 2010 results were down from the prior-year level of $4.3 billion, primarily due to the second quarter 2009 $6.7 billion after-tax ($11.1 billion pre-tax) gain on the sale of Smith Barney (SB) to the Morgan Stanley Smith Barney joint venture (MSSB JV). In addition, second quarter 2010 results reflected a difficult capital markets environment in Securities and Banking and the impact of the U.K. bonus tax of approximately $400 million, partially offset by a stabilizing to improving credit environment and growth in Asia andLatin America Regional Consumer Banking and Transaction Services. Citicorp's net income was $3.8 billion; Citi Holdings had a net loss of $1.2 billion.

        Revenues of $22.1 billion decreased 33% from comparable year-ago levels primarily due to the 2009 gain on sale of SB. Brokerage and Asset Management, which reflected the absence of SB revenues in the current quarter (approximately $0.9 billion in the second quarter of 2009), Local Consumer Lending and Securities and Banking also contributed to the decline in comparable revenues. Other core businesses showed continued strength, including Regional Consumer Banking and Transaction Services with $8.0 billion and $2.5 billion in revenue, respectively.

        Securities and Banking, which faced a challenging market environment during the second quarter of 2010, had revenues of $6.0 billion, a $0.7 billion decrease from the prior-year period. Lower fixed income and equity markets revenues reflected increasing investor uncertainty and volatility during the quarter, which reduced market-making opportunities. Fixed income markets revenues were $3.7 billion compared to $5.6 billion in the second quarter of 2009. Equity markets revenues were $652 million, compared to $1.1 billion in the prior-year quarter. Investment banking revenues declined 42% to $674 million, reflecting lower client market activities. Lending revenues were $522 million in the second quarter of 2010, compared with losses of $1.1 billion in the second quarter of 2009, primarily due to gains on credit default swap hedges, compared to losses in the prior-year quarter.

        Regional Consumer Banking revenues were up $187 million from the prior-year quarter to $8.0 billion on a comparable basis, driven by growth in Asia and Latin America.

        Transaction Services revenues were up from year-ago levels by 1%, to $2.5 billion, also driven by Asia and Latin America.

        Local Consumer Lending revenues of $4.2 billion in the second quarter of 2010 were down 15% on a comparable basis from a year ago, driven by the addition of $347 million of mortgage repurchase reserves related to North America residential real estate, lower volumes, and the deconsolidation of Primerica, Inc. (Primerica) from Citigroup, which completed its initial public offering and other equity transactions during the quarter.

        Revenues in the Special Asset Pool increased to $572 million in the second quarter of 2010, from negative $376 million in the prior year, largely driven by positive net revenue marks of $1.0 billion in the second quarter of 2010 versus $470 million in the same quarter of 2009. The growth in revenues was also driven by the absence of losses related to hedges of various asset positions recorded in the prior-year period.

        Net interest revenue increased 9% from the second quarter of 2009, primarily driven by the impact from the adoption of SFAS 166/167. Sequentially, Citi's net interest margin of 3.15% decreased by 17 basis points from the first quarter of 2010 due to the continued de-risking of loan portfolios, the expansion of loss mitigation efforts and the Primerica divestiture.

        Non-interest revenue decreased 53% from a year ago, primarily reflecting the gain on sale of SB in 2009.

        Operating expenses decreased 1% from the year-ago quarter and were up 3% from the first quarter of 2010. The decline in expenses from the year-ago quarter reflected the decrease in Citi Holdings expenses, primarily related to the absence of SB (approximately $900 million in the second quarter of 2009), which more than offset the increase in Citicorp expenses resulting from continued investments in the Citicorp businesses and the U.K. bonus tax in the current quarter. The increase in expenses from the first quarter of 2010 primarily related to the U.K. bonus tax, as ongoing investments in Citicorp businesses were partially offset by a continued decline in Citi Holdings expenses. Citi's full-time employees were 259,000 at June 30, 2010, down 20,000 from June 30, 2009 and down 4,000 from March 31, 2010.

        Net credit losses of $8.0 billion in the second quarter of 2010 were down 31% from year-ago levels on a comparable basis, and down 5% from the first quarter of 2010. Second quarter of 2010 net credit losses reflected improvement for the fourth consecutive quarter. Consumer net credit losses of $7.5 billion were down 23% on a comparable basis from last year and down 7% from the prior quarter. Corporate net credit losses of $472 million were down 73% from last year and up 30% from the prior quarter. The sequential increase in corporate net credit losses was principally due to the charge off of loans for which Citi had previously established specific FAS 114 reserves that were released during the second quarter upon recognition of the charge off.

        Citi's total allowance for loan losses was $46.2 billion at June 30, 2010, or 6.7% of total loans. This was down from 6.8% of total loans at March 31, 2010. During the second quarter of 2010, Citi had a net release of $1.5 billion to its credit reserves and allowance for unfunded lending

5


Table of Contents

commitments, compared to a net build of $4.0 billion in the second quarter of 2009 and a net release of $53 million in the first quarter of 2010. Approximately half of the net loan loss reserve release was related to consumer loans, and half related to corporate loans (principally specific reserves).

        The total allowance for loan losses for consumer loans decreased to $39.6 billion at the end of the quarter, but increased as a percentage of total consumer loans to 7.87%, compared to 7.84% at the end of the first quarter of 2010. The decrease in the allowance was mainly due to a net release of $827 million and reductions that did not flow through the provision. The reductions originated from asset sales in the U.S. real estate lending portfolio and certain loan portfolios moving to held-for-sale. The net release was mainly driven by Retail Partner Cards in Citi Holdings, as well as Latin America and Asia Regional Consumer Banking in Citicorp. During the second quarter of 2010, early- and later-stage delinquencies improved across most of the consumer loan portfolios, driven by improvement in North America mortgages, both in first and second mortgages. The improvement in first mortgages was entirely driven by asset sales and loans moving from the trial period under the U.S. Treasury's Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) to permanent modification. For total consumer loans, the 90 days or more consumer loan delinquency rate was 3.67% at June 30, 2010, compared to 4.01% at March 31, 2010 and 3.68% a year ago. The 30 to 89 days past due consumer loan delinquency rate was 3.06% at June 30, 2010, compared to 3.19% at March 31, 2010 and 3.41% a year ago. Consumer non-accrual loans totaled $13.8 billion at June 30, 2010, compared to $15.6 billion at March 31, 2010 and $15.8 billion at June 30, 2009.

        The total allowance for loan losses for funded corporate loans declined to $6.6 billion at June 30, 2010, or 3.59% of corporate loans, down from 3.90% in the first quarter of 2010. Corporate non-accrual loans were $11.0 billion at June 30, 2010, compared to $12.9 billion at March 31, 2010 and $12.5 billion a year ago. The decrease in non-accrual loans from the prior quarter was mainly due to loan sales, write-offs and paydowns, which were partially offset by increases due to the weakening of certain borrowers.

        The effective tax rate on continuing operations for the second quarter of 2010 was 23%, reflecting taxable earnings in lower tax rate jurisdictions, as well as tax advantaged earnings.

        Total deposits were $814 billion at June 30, 2010, down 2% from March 31, 2010 and up 1% from year-ago levels. Citi's structural liquidity (equity, long-term debt and deposits) as a percentage of assets was 71% at June 30, 2010, unchanged as compared with March 31, 2010 and compared with 71% at June 30, 2009.

        Total assets decreased $65 billion from the end of the first quarter 2010 to $1,938 billion. Citi Holdings assets decreased $38 billion during the second quarter of 2010, driven by approximately $19 billion of asset sales and business dispositions (including $6 billion from the Primerica initial public offering and $4 billion from the liquidation of subprime CDOs), $15 billion of net run-off and pay-downs and $4 billion of net credit losses and net asset marks. In addition, as part of its continued focus on reducing the assets in Citi Holdings, Citi reclassified $11.4 billion in assets from held-to-maturity to available-for-sale at June 30, 2010. This reclassification was in response to recent changes to SFAS 133 that allowed a one-time movement of certain assets classified as held-to-maturity or available-for-sale to the trading book as of July 1, 2010, and included $4.1 billion of auction rate securities that were in held-to-maturity. The remaining $7.3 billion consisted of securities in the Special Asset Pool for which prices have largely recovered and that Citi believes it should be able to sell over the short-to-medium term, rather than wait for them to mature or run-off. Citi Holdings total GAAP assets of $465 billion at June 30, 2010 represents 24% of Citi's total GAAP assets. Citi Holdings' risk-weighted assets were approximately $400 billion, or approximately 40% of Citi's risk-weighted assets, as of June 30, 2010.

        Citi's exposure to the ABCP CDO super senior positions was also reduced to zero during the second quarter of 2010 (although the Special Asset Pool retains exposure to a very small amount of underlying collateral assets). All of the 17 ABCP CDO deals structured by Citi have been liquidated as of the end of the second quarter.

        Citigroup'sTotal stockholders' equity increased by $3.4 billion during the second quarter of 2010 to $154.8 billion, primarily reflecting net income during the quarter, partially offset by a decline in Accumulated other comprehensive income largely from FX translation. Citigroup's total equity capital base and trust preferred securities were $175.0 billion at June 30, 2010. Citigroup maintained its "well-capitalized" position with a Tier 1 Capital Ratio of 11.99% at June 30, 2010, up from 11.28% at March 31, 2010.

Business Outlook

        As was the case with the second quarter of 2010 results in Securities and Banking, the global economic and capital markets environment are expected to continue to drive Citi's revenue levels in the third quarter. In addition, as previously disclosed, The Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009 (CARD Act) will continue to have a negative impact on U.S. credit card revenues. Citi continues to believe that, for the full year 2010, the negative net impact of the CARD Act on Citi-branded card revenues will be approximately $400 million to $600 million, including the impact of the Federal Reserve Board's recent adoption of final rules relating to penalty fee provisions. For Retail Partner Cards, Citi has increased its full year 2010 estimate of negative net revenue impact resulting from the CARD Act to approximately $150 million to $200 million, from $50 million to $150 million, given the new penalty fee provisions. In each of these portfolios, the vast majority of the 2010 net impact will occur in the second half of the year.

        Net revenue marks in the Special Asset Pool, which have been positive for the last five quarters, will remain episodic, although Citi continued to de-risk this portfolio during the second quarter of 2010, as evidenced by the CDO liquidations discussed above.

        Citi currently expects quarterly expenses to continue to be in the range of $11.5 billion to $12 billion for the remainder of 2010. As previously disclosed, Citicorp's expenses may continue to increase, reflecting ongoing investments in its core businesses, while Citi Holdings should continue to decline as assets are reduced.

        Credit costs will remain a key driver of earnings performance for the remainder of 2010. Assuming that the

6


Table of Contents

U.S. economy continues to recover and international recovery is sustained, Citi currently believes that consumer credit costs should continue to decline. Internationally, credit is expected to continue to improve, but at a moderating pace. In both North America cards portfolios, net credit losses are expected to improve modestly, but will likely remain elevated until U.S. employment levels improve significantly. In North America mortgages, net credit losses and delinquencies continued to improve during the second quarter of 2010, largely as the result of Citi's loss mitigation efforts, including sales of delinquent mortgages and the impact of loan modifications. Citi has observed, however, that, to date, the underlying credit quality of this portfolio has not been improving in the same manner as its cards portfolios. Mortgages are also particularly at risk to many external factors, such as unemployment trends, home prices, government modification programs and state foreclosure regulations. As a result, Citi expects to continue to pay particular attention to this portfolio and will continue its efforts to mitigate losses. Citigroup's consumer loan loss reserve balances will continue to reflect the losses embedded in the company's portfolios, given underlying credit trends and the impact of forbearance programs. Though credit trends in the corporate loan portfolio generally continued to improve, credit costs will continue to be episodic.

        Looking forward, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act was signed into law on July 21, 2010. The Act calls for significant structural reforms and new substantive regulation across the financial industry, including new consumer protections and increased scrutiny and regulation for any financial institution that could pose a systemic risk to market-wide financial stability. Many of the provisions of the Act will be subject to extensive rulemaking and interpretation, and a significant amount of uncertainty remains as to the ultimate impact of the Act on Citigroup. The Act will likely require Citigroup to eliminate, transform or change certain of its business activities and practices. The Financial Reform Act will also likely impose additional costs, some significant, on Citigroup, adversely affect its ability to pursue business opportunities it may otherwise consider engaging in, cause business disruptions and impact the value of the assets that Citigroup holds. In addition, the Act grants new regulatory authority to various U.S. federal regulators to impose heightened prudential standards on financial institutions. This authority, together with the continued implementation of new minimum capital standards for bank holding companies as adopted by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and U.S. regulators, has created significant uncertainty with respect to the future capital requirements or capital composition for institutions such as Citigroup. Citi will continue to monitor these developments closely.

7


Table of Contents

CITIGROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SUMMARY OF SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA—Page 1

 
 Second Quarter   
 Six Months Ended   
 
In millions of dollars,
except per share amounts
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
 2010  2009  2010  2009  

Total managed revenues(1)

  $22,071  $33,095   (33)% $47,492  $60,068   (21)%

Total managed net credit losses(1)

   7,962   11,470   (31)  16,346   21,300   (23)

Net interest revenue

  $14,039  $12,829   9% $28,600  $25,755   11%

Non-interest revenue

   8,032   17,140   (53)  18,892   28,735   (34)
              

Revenues, net of interest expense

  $22,071  $29,969   (26)% $47,492  $54,490   (13)%

Operating expenses

   11,866   11,999   (1)  23,384   23,684   (1)

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

   6,665   12,676   (47)  15,283   22,983   (34)
              

Income from continuing operations before income taxes

  $3,540  $5,294   (33)% $8,825  $7,823   13%

Income taxes (losses)

   812   907   (10)  1,848   1,742   6 
              

Income from continuing operations

  $2,728  $4,387   (38)% $6,977  $6,081   15%

Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes

   (3)  (142)  98   208   (259)  NM 
              

Net income (losses) before attribution of noncontrolling interests

  $2,725  $4,245   (36)% $7,185  $5,822   23%

Net income (losses) attributable to noncontrolling interests

   28   (34)  NM   60   (50)  NM 
              

Citigroup's net income

  $2,697  $4,279   (37)% $7,125  $5,872   21%
              

Less:

                   
 

Preferred dividends—Basic

    $1,495   (100)%   $2,716   (100)%
 

Impact of the conversion price reset related to the $12.5 billion convertible preferred stock private issuance—Basic(2)

           1,285   (100)
 

Preferred stock Series H discount accretion—Basic

     54   (100)    107   (100)
              

Income (loss) available to common stockholders

  $2,697  $2,730   (1)% $7,125  $1,764   NM 
 

Dividends and earnings allocated to participating securities, net of forfeitures

   26   105   (75)  57   69   (17)%
              

Undistributed earnings (loss) for basic EPS

  $2,671  $2,625   2%  $7,068  $1,695   NM 

Convertible Preferred Stock Dividends

     270   (100)    540   (100)%
              

Undistributed earnings (loss) for diluted EPS

  $2,671  $2,895   (8)% $7,068  $2,235   NM 
              

Earnings per share

                   
 

Basic(3)

                   
 

Income (loss) from continuing operations

  $0.09  $0.51   (82)% $0.24  $0.36   (33)%
 

Net income (loss)

   0.09   0.49   (82)  0.25   0.31   (19)
              
 

Diluted(3)

                   
 

Income (loss) from continuing operations

  $0.09  $0.51   (82)% $0.23  $0.36   (36)%
 

Net income (loss)

   0.09   0.49   (82)  0.24   0.31   (23)
              

[Continued on the following page, including notes to table.]

8


Table of Contents

SUMMARY OF SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA—Page 2

 
 Second Quarter   
 Six Months Ended   
 
In millions of dollars,
except per share amounts
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
 2010  2009  2010  2009  

At June 30:

                   

Total assets

  $1,937,656  $1,848,533   5%         

Total deposits

   813,951   804,736   1          

Long-term debt

   413,297   348,046   19          

Mandatorily redeemable securities of subsidiary Trusts (included in Long-term debt)

   20,218   24,196   (16)         

Common stockholders' equity

   154,494   78,001   98          

Total stockholders' equity

   154,806   152,302   2          

Direct staff (in thousands)

   259   279   (7)         
              

Ratios:

                   

Return on common stockholders' equity(3)

   7.0%  14.8%     9.5%  4.9%   
              

Tier 1 Common(4)

   9.71%  2.75%            

Tier 1 Capital

   11.99   12.74             

Total Capital

   15.59   16.62             

Leverage(5)

   6.31   6.90             
              

Common stockholders' equity to assets

   7.97%  4.22%            

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred stock dividends

   1.54   1.41      1.68   1.23    
              

(1)
See discussion of adoption of SFAS 166/167 on page 3 and in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

(2)
For the three months ended June 30, 2009, Income available to common stockholders includes a reduction of $1.285 billion related to a conversion price reset pursuant to Citigroup's prior agreement with the purchasers of $12.5 billion of convertible preferred stock issued in a private offering in January 2008. The conversion price was reset from $31.62 per share to $26.35 per share. There was no impact to net income, total stockholders' equity or capital ratios due to the reset. However, the reset resulted in a reclassification from Retained earnings to Additional paid-in capital of $1.285 billion and a reduction in Income available to common stockholders of $1.285 billion.

(3)
The return on average common stockholders' equity is calculated using income (loss) available to common stockholders.

(4)
As defined by the banking regulators, the Tier 1 Common ratio represents Tier 1 Capital less qualifying perpetual preferred stock, qualifying noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries and qualifying mandatorily redeemable securities of subsidiary trusts divided by risk-weighted assets. Tier 1 Common ratio is a non-GAAP financial measure. See "Capital Resources and Liquidity" below for additional information on this measure.

(5)
The Leverage ratio represents Tier 1 Capital divided by each period's quarterly adjusted average total assets.

NM
Not meaningful

9


Table of Contents


SEGMENT, BUSINESS AND PRODUCT—INCOME (LOSS) AND REVENUES

        The following tables show the income (loss) and revenues for Citigroup on a segment, business and product view:


CITIGROUP INCOME (LOSS)

 
 Second Quarter   
 Six Months   
 
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars 2010  2009  2010  2009  

Income (loss) from Continuing Operations

                   

CITICORP

                   

Regional Consumer Banking

                   
 

North America

  $62  $139   (55)% $84  $496   (83)%
 

EMEA

   50   (110)  NM   77   (143)  NM 
 

Latin America

   491   116   NM   880   335   NM 
 

Asia

   574   279   NM   1,150   527   NM 
              
  

Total

  $1,177  $424   NM  $2,191  $1,215   80%
              

Securities and Banking

                   
 

North America

  $839  $(32)  NM  $2,263  $2,465   (8)%
 

EMEA

   355   746   (52)%  1,387   2,917   (52)
 

Latin America

   197   527   (63)  469   939   (50)
 

Asia

   294   597   (51)  772   1,653   (53)
              
  

Total

  $1,685  $1,838   (8)% $4,891  $7,974   (39)%
              

Transaction Services

                   
 

North America

  $166  $181   (8)% $325  $319   2%
 

EMEA

   318   350   (9)  624   676   (8)
 

Latin America

   153   150   2   310   310   
 

Asia

   297   293   1   616   573   8 
              
  

Total

  $934  $974   (4)% $1,875  $1,878   
              

Institutional Clients Group

  $2,619  $2,812   (7)% $6,766  $9,852   (31)%
              

Total Citicorp

  $3,796  $3,236   17% $8,957  $11,067   (19)%
              

CITI HOLDINGS

                   

Brokerage and Asset Management

   (88) $6,775   NM  $(7) $6,809   (100)%

Local Consumer Lending

  $(1,230)  (4,347)  72%  (3,068)  (5,918)  48 

Special Asset Pool

   121   (1,246)  NM   1,002   (5,194)  NM 
              

Total Citi Holdings

  $(1,197) $1,182   NM  $(2,073) $(4,303)  52%
              

Corporate/Other

  $129  $(31)  NM  $93  $(683)  NM 
              

Income from continuing operations

  $2,728  $4,387   (38)% $6,977  $6,081   15%
              

Discontinued operations

  $(3) $(142)  98% $208  $(259)  NM 

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

   28   (34)  NM   60   (50)  NM 
              

Citigroup's net income

  $2,697  $4,279   (37)% $7,125  $5,872   21%
              

NM    Not meaningful

10


Table of Contents


CITIGROUP REVENUES

 
 Second Quarter   
 Six Months   
 
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars 2010  2009  2010  2009  

CITICORP

                   

Regional Consumer Banking

                   
 

North America

  $3,693  $2,182   69% $7,494  $4,685   60%
 

EMEA

   376   394   (5)  781   754   4 
 

Latin America

   2,118   1,950   9   4,194   3,874   8 
 

Asia

   1,845   1,675   10   3,645   3,241   12 
              

Total

  $8,032  $6,201   30% $16,114  $12,554   28%
              

Securities and Banking

                   
 

North America

  $2,627  $1,721   53% $6,180  $6,737   (8)%
 

EMEA

   1,762   2,558   (31)  4,277   6,780   (37)
 

Latin America

   558   1,049   (47)  1,165   1,849   (37)
 

Asia

   1,008   1,373   (27)  2,336   3,535   (34)
              
  

Total

  $5,955  $6,701   (11)% $13,958  $18,901   (26)%
              

Transaction Services

                   
 

North America

  $636  $656   (3)% $1,275  $1,245   2%
 

EMEA

   848   860   (1)  1,681   1,704   (1)
 

Latin America

   356   340   5   700   683   2 
 

Asia

   662   627   6   1,283   1,225   5 
              
  

Total

  $2,502  $2,483   1% $4,939  $4,857   2%
              

Institutional Clients Group

  $8,457  $9,184   (8)% $18,897  $23,758   (20)%
              
  

Total Citicorp

  $16,489  $15,385   7% $35,011  $36,312   (4)%
              

CITI HOLDINGS

                   

Brokerage and Asset Management

  $141  $12,220   (99)% $481  $13,827   (97)%

Local Consumer Lending

   4,206   3,481   21   8,876   9,502   (7)

Special Asset Pool

   572   (376)  NM   2,112   (4,910)  NM 
              

Total Citi Holdings

  $4,919  $15,325   (68)% $11,469  $18,419   (38)%
              

Corporate/Other

  $663  $(741)  NM  $1,012  $(241)  NM 
              

Total net revenues

  $22,071  $29,969   (26)% $47,492  $54,490   (13)%
              
 

Impact of Credit Card Securitization Activity(1)

                   
  

Citicorp

  $  $1,644   NM  $  $3,128   NM 
  

Citi Holdings

     1,482   NM     2,450   NM 
              

Total impact of credit card securitization activity

  $  $3,126   NM  $  $5,578   NM 
              

Total Citigroup—managed net revenues(1)

  $22,071  $33,095   (33)% $47,492  $60,068   (21)%
              

(1)
See discussion of adoption of SFAS 166/167 on page 3 and in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

NM    Not meaningful

11


Table of Contents


CITICORP

        Citicorp is the company's global bank for consumers and businesses and represents Citi's core franchise. Citicorp is focused on providing best-in-class products and services to customers and leveraging Citigroup's unparalleled global network. Citicorp is physically present in approximately 100 countries, many for over 100 years, and offers services in over 160 countries and jurisdictions. Citi believes this global network provides a strong foundation for servicing the broad financial services needs of large multinational clients and for meeting the needs of retail, private banking and commercial customers around the world. Citigroup's global footprint provides coverage of the world's emerging economies, which Citi believes represents a strong area of growth. At June 30, 2010, Citicorp had approximately $1.2 trillion of assets and $719 billion of deposits, representing approximately 62% of Citi's total assets and approximately 88% of its deposits.

        Citicorp consists of the following businesses: Regional Consumer Banking (which includes retail banking and Citi-branded cards in four regions—North America, EMEA, Latin America and Asia) and Institutional Clients Group (which includes Securities and Banking and Transaction Services).

 
 Second Quarter   
 Six Months   
 
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars 2010  2009  2010  2009  
 

Net interest revenue

  $9,742  $8,774   11% $19,612  $17,285   13%
 

Non-interest revenue

   6,747   6,611   2   15,399   19,027   (19)
              

Total revenues, net of interest expense

  $16,489  $15,385   7% $35,011  $36,312   (4)%
              

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

                   
 

Net credit losses

  $2,965  $1,575   88% $6,107  $2,826   NM 
 

Credit reserve build (release)

   (639)  1,231   NM   (999)  2,229   NM 
              
 

Provision for loan losses

  $2,326  $2,806   (17)% $5,108  $5,055   1%
 

Provision for benefits and claims

   27   42   (36)  71   84   (15)
 

Provision for unfunded lending commitments

   (26)  83   NM   (33)  115   NM 
              
  

Total provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

  $2,327  $2,931   (21)% $5,146  $5,254   (2)%
              

Total operating expenses

  $9,090  $8,068   13% $17,575  $15,467   14%
              

Income from continuing operations before taxes

  $5,072  $4,386   16% $12,290  $15,591   (21)%

Provisions for income taxes

   1,276   1,150   11   3,333   4,524   (26)
              

Income from continuing operations

  $3,796  $3,236   17% $8,957  $11,067   (19)%

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

   20   3   NM   41     
              

Citicorp's net income

  $3,776  $3,233   17% $8,916  $11,067   (19)%
              

Balance sheet data (in billions of dollars)

                   

Total EOP assets

  $1,211  $1,051   15%         

Average assets

   1,250   1,074   16  $1,242  $1,066   17%

Return on assets

   1.21%  1.21%     1.45%  2.09%   

Total EOP deposits

  $719  $706   2%         
              

Total GAAP revenues

  $16,489  $15,385   7% $35,011  $36,312   (4)%
 

Net impact of credit card securitization activity(1)

     1,644   NM     3,128   NM 
              

Total managed revenues

  $16,489  $17,029   (3)% $35,011  $39,440   (11)%
              

GAAP net credit losses

  $2,965  $1,575   88% $6,107  $2,826   NM 
 

Impact of credit card securitization activity(1)

     1,837   NM     3,328   NM 
              

Total managed net credit losses

  $2,965  $3,412   (13)% $6,107  $6,154   (1)%
              

(1)
See discussion of adoption of SFAS 166/167 on page 3 and in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

NM
Not meaningful

12


Table of Contents

REGIONAL CONSUMER BANKING

        Regional Consumer Banking (RCB) consists of Citigroup's four regional consumer banking businesses that provide traditional banking services to retail customers. RCB also contains Citigroup's branded cards business and Citi's local commercial banking business. RCB is a globally diversified business with over 4,200 branches in 39 countries around the world. During the first quarter of 2010, 53% of total RCB revenues were from outside North America. Additionally, the majority of international revenues and loans were from emerging economies in Asia, Latin America, and Central and Eastern Europe. At June 30, 2010, RCB had $309 billion of assets and $291 billion of deposits.

 
 Second Quarter  %  Six Months  %  
In millions of dollars 2010  2009  Change  2010  2009  Change  

Net interest revenue

  $5,774  $4,140   39% $11,691  $7,982   46%

Non-interest revenue

   2,258   2,061   10   4,423   4,572   (3)
              

Total revenues, net of interest expense

  $8,032  $6,201   30% $16,114  $12,554   28%
              

Total operating expenses

  $3,982  $3,703   8% $7,919  $7,207   10%
              
 

Net credit losses

  $2,922  $1,406   NM  $5,962  $2,580   NM 
 

Provision for unfunded lending commitments

   (4)      (4)    
 

Credit reserve build (release)

   (408)  619   NM   (588)  1,305   NM 
 

Provisions for benefits and claims

   27   42   (36)%  71   84   (15)%
              

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

  $2,537  $2,067   23% $5,441  $3,969   37%
              

Income from continuing operations before taxes

  $1,513  $431   NM  $2,754  $1,378   100%

Income taxes

   336   7   NM   563   163   NM 
              

Income from continuing operations

  $1,177  $424   NM  $2,191  $1,215   80%

Net (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

         (5)    
              

Net income

  $1,177  $424   NM  $2,196  $1,215   81%
              

Average assets (in billions of dollars)

  $306  $239   28% $307  $234   31%

Return on assets

   1.54%  0.71%     1.44%  1.05%   

Average deposits (in billions of dollars)

   291   272   7%         
              

Managed net credit losses as a percentage of average managed loans

   5.38%  6.01%            
              

Revenue by business

                   
 

Retail banking

  $3,916  $3,789   3% $7,730  $7,326   6%
 

Citi-branded cards

   4,116   2,412   71   8,384   5,228   60 
              
  

Total GAAP revenues

  $8,032  $6,201   30% $16,114  $12,554   28%
 

Net impact of credit card securitization activity(1)

     1,644   NM     3,128   NM 
              
 

Total managed revenues

  $8,032  $7,845   2% $16,114  $15,682   3%
              

Net credit losses by business

                   
 

Retail banking

  $304  $428   (29)% $593  $766   (23)%
 

Citi-branded cards

   2,618   978   NM  $5,369  $1,814   NM 
              
  

Total GAAP net credit losses

  $2,922  $1,406   NM  $5,962  $2,580   NM 
 

Net impact of credit card securitization activity(1)

     1,837   NM     3,328   NM 
              
 

Total managed net credit losses

  $2,922  $3,243   (10)% $5,962  $5,908   1%
              

Income (loss) from continuing operations by business

                   
 

Retail banking

  $884  $635   (39)% $1,732  $1,285   35%
 

Citi-branded cards

   293   (211)  NM   459   (70)  NM 
              
  

Total

  $1,177  $424   NM  $2,191  $1,215   80%
              

(1)
See discussion of adoption of SFAS 166/167 on page 3 and in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

NM
Not meaningful

13


Table of Contents


NORTH AMERICA REGIONAL CONSUMER BANKING

        North America Regional Consumer Banking (NA RCB) provides traditional banking and Citi-branded card services to retail customers and small- to mid-size businesses in the U.S. NA RCB's approximately 1,000 retail bank branches and 13.3 million retail customer accounts are largely concentrated in the greater metropolitan areas of New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Chicago, Miami, Washington, D.C., Boston, Philadelphia, and certain larger cities in Texas. At June 30, 2010, NA RCB had approximately $30.2 billion of retail banking and residential real estate loans and $144.7 billion of deposits. In addition, NA RCB had approximately 21.3 million Citi-branded credit card accounts, with $77.2 billion in outstanding card loan balances.

 
 Second Quarter   
 Six Months   
 
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars 2010  2009  2010  2009  

Net interest revenue

  $2,778  $1,330   NM  $5,732  $2,522   NM 

Non-interest revenue

   915   852   7%  1,762   2,163   (19)%
              

Total revenues, net of interest expense

  $3,693  $2,182   69% $7,494  $4,685   60%
              

Total operating expenses

  $1,499  $1,486   1% $3,110  $2,980   4%
              
 

Net credit losses

  $2,126  $307   NM  $4,283  $564   NM 
 

Credit reserve build (release)

   (9)  149   NM   (5)  402   NM 
 

Provisions for benefits and claims

   5   15   (67)%  13   28   (54)%
              

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims

  $2,122  $471   NM  $4,291  $994   NM 
              

Income from continuing operations before taxes

  $72  $225   (68)% $93  $711   (87)%

Income taxes (benefits)

   10   86   (88)  9   215   (96)
              

Income from continuing operations

  $62  $139   (55)% $84  $496   (83)%

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

             
              

Net income

  $62  $139   (55)% $84  $496   (83)%
              

Average assets (in billions of dollars)

  $117  $74   58% $119  $73   63%

Average deposits (in billions of dollars)

   145.5   139.6   4          
              

Managed net credit losses as a percentage of average managed loans(1)

   7.98%  7.36%            
              

Revenue by business

                   
 

Retail banking

  $1,323  $1,376   (4)% $2,603  $2,672   (3)%
 

Citi-branded cards

   2,370   806   NM   4,891   2,013   NM 
              
  

Total GAAP revenues

  $3,693  $2,182   69% $7,494  $4,685   60%
 

Net impact of credit card securitization activity(2)

     1,644   NM     3,128   NM 
              
 

Total managed revenues

  $3,693  $3,826   (3)% $7,494  $7,813   (4)%
              

Net credit losses by business

                   
 

Retail banking

  $79  $88   (10)% $152  $144   6%
 

Citi-branded cards

   2,047   219   NM   4,131   420   NM 
              
  

Total GAAP net credit losses

  $2,126  $307   NM  $4,283  $564   NM 
 

Net impact of credit card securitization activity(2)

     1,837   NM     3,328   NM 
              
 

Total managed net credit losses

  $2,126  $2,144   (1)% $4,283  $3,892   10%
              

Income (loss) from continuing operations by business

                   
 

Retail banking

  $225  $242   (7)% $409  $483   (15)%
 

Citi-branded cards

   (163)  (103)  (58)  (325)  13   NM 
              
  

Total

  $62  $139   (55)% $84  $496   (83)%
              

(1)
See "Managed Presentations" below.

(2)
See discussion of adoption of SFAS 166/167 on page 3 and in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

NM
Not meaningful

2Q10 vs. 2Q09

        Revenues, net of interest expense, increased 69% primarily due to the consolidation of securitized credit card receivables pursuant to the adoption of SFAS 166/167 effective January 2010. On a managed basis, revenues, net of interest expense, decreased 3%, primarily reflecting the net impact of the CARD Act on branded cards revenues and lower volumes in cards and mortgages.

        Net interest revenue was down 8% on a managed basis, driven by the net impact of the CARD Act as well as lower volumes in cards, where average managed loans were down 7% from the prior-year quarter, and in retail banking, where average loans were down 12%.

        Non-interest revenue increased 11% on a managed basis primarily due to better servicing hedge results in mortgages, partially offset by lower fees in cards, mainly due to a 15% decline in open accounts from the prior-year quarter.

        Operating expenses increased 1% from the prior-year quarter primarily due to higher marketing costs.

        Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims increased $1.7 billion primarily due to the consolidation of securitized credit card receivables pursuant to the adoption of

14


Table of Contents

SFAS 166/167. On a comparable basis, Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims decreased $186 million, or 8%, primarily due to the absence of a $149 million loan loss reserve build in the prior-year quarter and lower net credit losses. Net credit losses were down $9 million in both cards and retail banking. The branded cards managed net credit loss ratio increased from 10.08% to 10.77%, and the retail banking net credit loss ratio increased from 1.01% to 1.03%, with the increases in both businesses driven by the decline in their average loans.

2Q10 YTD vs. 2Q09 YTD

        Revenues, net of interest expense, increased 60% primarily due to the consolidation of securitized credit card receivables pursuant to the adoption of SFAS 166/167 effective January 2010. On a managed basis, revenues, net of interest expense, declined 4% from the prior-year period, mainly due to lower volumes in cards and mortgages, as well as the net impact of the CARD Act on branded cards revenues.

        Net interest revenue was down 5% on a managed basis driven primarily by lower volumes in cards, with average managed loans down 6% from the prior-year period, and in mortgages, where average loans were down 13%.

        Non-interest revenue declined 1% on a managed basis from the prior-year period, driven by lower gains from mortgage loan sales and lower fees in cards, due to a 15% decline in open accounts, partially offset by better servicing hedge results in mortgages.

        Operating expenses increased 4% from the prior-year period. Expenses were flat excluding the impact of a litigation reserve in the first quarter of 2010.

        Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims increased $3.3 billion primarily due to the consolidation of securitized credit card receivables pursuant to the adoption of SFAS 166/167. On a comparable basis, Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claimsdecreased $31 million, or 1%, primarily due to the absence of a $402 million loan loss reserve build in the prior-year period, offset by higher net credit losses in the branded cards portfolio. The cards managed net credit loss ratio increased from 9.17% to 10.72%, while the retail banking net credit loss ratio increased from 0.84% to 0.97%.

Managed Presentations

 
 Second Quarter  
 
 2010  2009  

Managed credit losses as a percentage of average managed loans

   7.98%  7.36%

Impact from credit card securitizations(1)

     (4.75)%
      

Net credit losses as a percentage of average loans

   7.98%  2.61%
      

(1)
See discussion of adoption of SFAS 166/167 on page 3 and in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

15


Table of Contents


EMEA REGIONAL CONSUMER BANKING

        EMEA Regional Consumer Banking (EMEA RCB) provides traditional banking and Citi-branded card services to retail customers and small- to mid-size businesses, primarily in Central and Eastern Europe, the Middle East and Africa. Remaining activities in respect of Western Europe retail banking are included in Citi Holdings. EMEA RCB has repositioned its business, shifting from a strategy of widespread distribution to a focused strategy concentrating on larger urban markets within the region. An exception is Bank Handlowy, which has a mass market presence in Poland. The countries in which EMEA RCB has the largest presence are Poland, Turkey, Russia and the United Arab Emirates. At June 30, 2010, EMEA RCB had approximately 304 retail bank branches with approximately 3.7 million customer accounts, $4.3 billion in retail banking loans and $8.9 billion in average deposits. In addition, the business had approximately 2.4 million Citi-branded card accounts with $2.6 billion in outstanding card loan balances.

 
 Second Quarter   
 Six Months   
 
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars 2010  2009  2010  2009  

Net interest revenue

  $230  $243   (5)% $478  $467   2%

Non-interest revenue

   146   151   (3)  303   287   6 
              

Total revenues, net of interest expense

  $376  $394   (5)% $781  $754   4%
              

Total operating expenses

  $268  $282   (5)% $545  $538   1%
              
 

Net credit losses

  $85  $121   (30)% $182  $210   (13)%
 

Provision for unfunded lending commitments

   (4)      (4)    
 

Credit reserve build (release)

   (46)  158   NM   (56)  230   NM 
 

Provisions for benefits and claims

             
              

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

  $35  $279   (87)% $122  $440   (72)%
              

Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes

  $73  $(167)  NM  $114  $(224)  NM 

Income taxes (benefits)

   23   (57)  NM   37   (81)  NM 
              

Income (loss) from continuing operations

  $50  $(110)  NM  $77  $(143)  NM 

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

             
              

Net income (loss)

  $50  $(110)  NM  $77  $(143)  NM 
              

Average assets (in billions of dollars)

  $10  $11   (9)% $10  $11   (9)%

Return on assets

   2.01%  (4.01)%     1.55%  (2.62)%   

Average deposits (in billions of dollars)

  $8.9  $9.0   (1)% $9.3  $8.7   7%
              

Net credit losses as a percentage of average loans

   4.74%  5.78%            
              

Revenue by business

                   
 

Retail banking

  $205  $234   (12)% $427  $439   (3)%
 

Citi-branded cards

   171   160   7   354   315   12 
              
  

Total

  $376  $394   (5)% $781  $754   4%
              

Income (loss) from continuing operations by business

                   
 

Retail banking

  $9  $(76)  NM  $3  $(117)  NM 
 

Citi-branded cards

   41   (34)  NM   74   (26)  NM 
              
  

Total

  $50  $(110)  NM  $77  $(143)  NM 
              

NM
Not meaningful

2Q10 vs. 2Q09

        Revenues, net of interest expense, decreased 5%. A majority of the decrease is due to lower lending volumes and balances as a result of tighter origination criteria as the business was repositioned. This was partially offset by higher revenues in cards and wealth management and the impact of foreign exchange translation (generally referred to throughout this report as "FX translation"). Cards purchase sales were up 11% and investment sales were up 40%. Assets under management decreased 9% primarily due to market valuations.

        Net interest revenue decreased 5% due to lower Average Loans, particularly in the United Arab Emirates, Romania and Poland. Average retail and card loans decreased 20% and 4%, respectively.

        Non-interest revenue decreased 3%.

        Operating expenses decreased 5%, mainly due to cost savings from branch closures, headcount reductions and re-engineering benefits, partially offset by the impact of FX translation.

        Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims decreased 87%, mainly due to the impact of a $46 million loan loss reserve release in the current quarter, compared to a $158 million build in the prior-year quarter, and a 30% decline in net credit losses, driven by improvements in credit conditions across most markets. The release in loan loss reserves in the current period was driven by improvement in the credit environment in most countries, coupled with a decline in receivables. The cards net credit loss ratio decreased from 6.73% in the prior-year quarter to 5.79% in the current quarter. The retail banking net credit loss ratio decreased from 5.30% in the prior-year quarter to 4.10% in the current quarter.

2Q10 YTD vs. 2Q09 YTD

        Revenues, net of interest expense, increased 4%. The increase in revenues was primarily attributable to the impact of FX translation and higher revenues in cards due to higher volumes, partially offset by lower lending revenues, as a result of lower volumes due to tighter origination criteria as the business was repositioned. Cards purchase sales increased 14% and average cards loans grew 6%.

        Net interest revenue increased 2%, mainly due to higher cards revenues, particularly in Russia and Poland, and the impact of FX translation.

16


Table of Contents

        Non-interest revenue increased 6%, primarily driven by higher results from an equity investment in Turkey.

        Operating expenses increased 1% driven by the impact of FX translation, largely offset by cost savings from branch closures, headcount reductions and re-engineering benefits.

        Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims decreased 72%, mainly due to the impact of net loan loss reserve release of $56 million in the first half of 2010, compared to a $230 million build in the prior-year period, and a 13% decline in net credit losses. The release of loan loss reserves in the current period was driven by improvement in the credit environment in most countries, coupled with a decline in receivables. The cards net credit loss ratio increased from 5.68% to 6.41%, while the retail banking net credit loss ratio decreased from 4.91% to 3.91%.

17


Table of Contents


LATIN AMERICA REGIONAL CONSUMER BANKING

        Latin America Regional Consumer Banking (LATAM RCB) provides traditional banking and Citi-branded card services to retail customers and small- to mid-size businesses, with the largest presence in Mexico and Brazil. LATAM RCB includes branch networks throughout Latin America as well as Banamex, Mexico's second largest bank with over 1,700 branches. At June 30, 2010, LATAM RCB had approximately 2,205 retail branches, with 25.9 million customer accounts, $19.6 billion in retail banking loan balances and $39.9 billion in average deposits. In addition, the business had approximately 12.2 million Citi-branded card accounts with $12.0 billion in outstanding loan balances.

 
 Second Quarter   
 Six Months   
 
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars 2010  2009  2010  2009  

Net interest revenue

  $1,471  $1,368   8% $2,929  $2,643   11%

Non-interest revenue

   647   582   11   1,265   1,231   3 
              

Total revenues, net of interest expense

  $2,118  $1,950   9% $4,194  $3,874   8%
              

Total operating expenses

  $1,266  $1,090   16% $2,408  $2,048   18%
              
 

Net credit losses

  $457  $610   (25)% $966  $1,151   (16)%
 

Credit reserve build (release)

   (241)  156   NM   (377)  322   NM 
 

Provision for benefits and claims

   22   27   (19)  58   56   4 
              

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims

  $238  $793   (70)% $647  $1,529   (58)%
              

Income from continuing operations before taxes

  $614  $67   NM  $1,139  $297   NM 

Income taxes

   123   (49)  NM   259   (38)  NM 
              

Income from continuing operations

  $491  $116   NM  $880  $335   NM 

Net (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

         (5)    
              

Net income

  $491  $116   NM  $885  $335   NM 
              

Average assets (in billions of dollars)

  $74  $66   12  $73  $63   16%

Return on assets

   2.66%  0.70%     2.44%  1.07%   

Average deposits (in billions of dollars)

   39.9   36.0   11%  39.8   35.1   13%
              

Net credit losses as a percentage of average loans

   5.84%  8.68%            
              

Revenue by business

                   
 

Retail banking

  $1,236  $1,112   11% $2,432  $2,138   14%
 

Citi-branded cards

   882   838   5   1,762   1,736   1 
              
  

Total

  $2,118  $1,950   9% $4,194  $3,874   8%
              

Income (loss) from continuing operations by business

                   
 

Retail banking

  $275  $196   40% $531  $426   25%
 

Citi-branded cards

   216   (80)  NM   349   (91)  NM 
              
  

Total

  $491  $116   NM  $880  $335   NM 
              

NM
Not meaningful

2Q10 vs. 2Q09

        Revenues, net of interest expense, increased 9%, mainly due to the impact of FX translation and higher lending and deposit volumes in retail banking, partially offset by lower volumes in the cards portfolio, due to continued repositioning, particularly in Mexico.

        Net interest revenue increased 8%, mainly driven by the impact of FX translation and higher lending and deposit volumes in retail banking. Average retail banking loans and deposits increased 19% and 11%, respectively. The increase in retail banking volumes was partially offset by lower volumes in the cards business as a result of a lower risk profile.

        Non-interest revenue increased 11%, primarily due to the impact of FX translation, higher fees in the cards business and higher investment sales revenues.

        Operating expenses increased 16%, due to the impact of FX translation, marketing initiatives and a cards intangible impairment.

        Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims decreased 70%, mainly due to the impact of a $241 million loan loss reserve release in the current period, compared to a $156 million build in the prior-year quarter, and a 25% decline in net credit losses, reflecting improved credit conditions, especially in Mexico cards. The cards net credit loss ratio declined across the region during the period, from 15.91% to 12.07%, reflecting continued economic recovery. The retail banking net credit loss ratio dropped significantly from 3.40% to 1.98%.

2Q10 YTD vs. 2Q09 YTD

        Revenues, net of interest expense, increased 8%, mainly due to the impact of FX translation and higher lending and deposit volumes in retail banking, partially offset by spread compression and lower volumes in the cards portfolio due to continued repositioning, particularly in Mexico.

        Net interest revenue increased 11%, mainly driven by the impact of FX translation and higher lending and deposit volumes in retail banking. Average retail banking loans and deposits increased 20% and 13%, respectively. The increase in retail banking was partially offset by spread compression and lower volumes in the cards portfolio as a result of a lower risk profile.

        Non-interest revenue increased 3%, due to the impact of FX translation, higher fees in the cards business and higher investment sales revenues.

        Operating expenses increased 18%, mainly due to the impact of FX translation. Excluding the impact of FX translation, the increase in operating

18


Table of Contents

expenses was driven by the cost of 139 additional branch openings and marketing initiatives, primarily in Mexico.

        Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims decreased 58%, mainly due to the impact of net loan loss reserve release of $377 million in the first half of 2010, compared to a $322 million build in the prior-year period, and a 16% decline in net credit losses, reflecting improved credit conditions, especially in Mexico cards. The cards net credit loss ratio declined from 15.5% to 13.0%, while the retail banking net credit loss ratio declined from 3.2% to 2.0%.

19


Table of Contents


ASIA REGIONAL CONSUMER BANKING

        Asia Regional Consumer Banking (Asia RCB) provides traditional banking and Citi-branded card services to retail customers and small- to mid-size businesses, with the largest Citi presence in South Korea, Australia, Singapore, India, Taiwan, Malaysia, Japan and Hong Kong. At June 30, 2010, Asia RCB had approximately 704 retail branches, 16.0 million retail banking accounts, $97.1 billion in average customer deposits, and $55.0 billion in retail banking loans. In addition, the business had approximately 14.9 million Citi-branded card accounts with $17.6 billion in outstanding loan balances.

 
 Second Quarter   
 Six Months   
 
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars 2010  2009  2010  2009  

Net interest revenue

  $1,295  $1,199   8% $2,552  $2,350   9%

Non-interest revenue

   550   476   16   1,093   891   23 
              

Total revenues, net of interest expense

  $1,845  $1,675   10% $3,645  $3,241   12%
              

Total operating expenses

  $949  $845   12% $1,856  $1,641   13%
              
 

Net credit losses

  $254  $368   (31)% $531  $655   (19)%
 

Credit reserve build (release)

   (112)  156   NM   (150)  351   NM 
              

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims

  $142  $524   (73)% $381  $1,006   (62)%
              

Income from continuing operations before taxes

  $754  $306   NM  $1,408  $594   NM 

Income taxes

   180   27   NM   258   67   NM 
              

Income from continuing operations

  $574  $279   NM  $1,150  $527   NM 

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

             
              

Net income

  $574  $279   NM  $1,150  $527   NM 
              

Average assets (in billions of dollars)

  $105  $88   19% $105  $87   21%

Return on assets

   2.19%  1.27%     2.21%  1.22%   

Average deposits (in billions of dollars)

   97.1   87.6   11%  96.4   85.4   13%
              

Net credit losses as a percentage of average loans

   1.41%  2.35%            
              

Revenue by business

                   
 

Retail banking

  $1,152  $1,067   8% $2,268  $2,077   9%
 

Citi-branded cards

   693   608   14   1,377   1,164   18 
              
  

Total

  $1,845  $1,675   10% $3,645  $3,241   12%
              

Income from continuing operations by business

                   
 

Retail banking

  $375  $273   37% $789  $493   60%
 

Citi-branded cards

   199   6   NM   361   34   NM 
              
  

Total

  $574  $279   NM  $1,150  $527   NM 
              

NM
Not meaningful

2Q10 vs. 2Q09

        Revenues, net of interest expense, increased 10%, reflecting higher cards purchase sales, investment sales, loan and deposit volumes, and the impact of FX translation, partially offset by spread compression in retail banking.

        Net interest revenue was 8% higher than the prior-year period, mainly due to higher lending and deposit volumes and the impact of FX translation. Average loans and deposits were up 15% and 11%, respectively. Spreads for branded cards remained relatively flat, while retail banking spreads declined marginally, due to mix and a continued low interest rate environment relative to the prior-year quarter.

        Non-interest revenue increased 16%, primarily due to higher investment revenues, higher cards purchase sales, higher revenues from deposit products, and the impact of FX translation.

        Operating expenses increased 12%, primarily due to the impact of FX translation. Excluding the impact of FX translation, the increase was driven primarily by an increase in volumes and higher investment spending.

        Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims decreased 73%, mainly due to the impact of a $112 million loan loss reserve release in the current quarter, compared to a $156 million loan loss reserve build in the prior-year quarter, and a decrease in net credit losses of 31%. These declines were partially offset by the impact of FX translation. Delinquencies and net credit losses continued to decline from their peak level in the second quarter of 2009 as the region benefitted from continued economic recovery and increased levels of customer activity, with India showing the most significant improvement. The cards net credit loss ratio decreased from 5.94% in the prior-year quarter to 3.90% in the current quarter. The retail banking net credit loss ratio decreased from 1.10% in the prior-year quarter to 0.61% in the current quarter.

2Q10 YTD vs. 2Q09 YTD

        Revenues, net of interest expense, increased 12%, driven by higher cards purchase sales, investment sales and loan and deposit volumes, and the impact of FX translation, partially offset by spread compression in retail banking.

        Net interest revenue was 9% higher than the prior-year period, mainly due to higher lending and deposit volumes and the impact of FX translation, offset by lower spreads.

20


Table of Contents

        Non-interest revenue increased 23%, primarily due to higher investment revenues, higher cards purchase sales, and the impact of FX translation.

        Operating expenses increased 13%, primarily due to the impact of FX translation, increase in volumes and higher investment spending.

        Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims decreased 62%, mainly due to the impact of a net loan loss reserve release of $150 million in the first half of 2010, compared to a $351 million loan loss reserve build in the prior-year period, and a 19% decline in net credit losses. These declines were partially offset by the impact of FX translation.

21


Table of Contents


INSTITUTIONAL CLIENTS GROUP

        Institutional Clients Group (ICG) includes Securities and Banking and Transaction Services. ICG provides corporate, institutional and ultra-high net worth clients with a full range of products and services, including cash management, trading, underwriting, lending and advisory services, around the world. ICG's international presence is supported by trading floors in approximately 75 countries and a proprietary network withinTransaction Services in over 95 countries. At June 30, 2010, ICG had approximately $944 billion of average assets and $427 billion of deposits.

 
 Second Quarter   
 Six Months   
 
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars 2010  2009  2010  2009  

Commissions and fees

  $1,086  $1,019   7%  2,194   1,978   11%

Administration and other fiduciary fees

   615   712   (14)  1,336   1,420   (6)

Investment banking

   592   1,240   (52)  1,545   2,181   (29)

Principal transactions

   1,632   880   85   4,976   7,830   (36)

Other

   564   699   (19)  925   1,046   (12)
              
 

Total non-interest revenue

  $4,489  $4,550   (1)%  10,976   14,455   (24)%
 

Net interest revenue (including dividends)

   3,968   4,634   (14)  7,921   9,303   (15)
              

Total revenues, net of interest expense

  $8,457  $9,184   (8)%  18,897   23,758   (20)%

Total operating expenses

   5,108   4,365   17   9,656   8,260   17 
 

Net credit losses

   43   169   (75)  145   246   (41)
 

Provision for unfunded lending commitments

   (22)  83   NM   (29)  115   NM 
 

Credit reserve build (release)

   (231)  612   NM   (411)  924   NM 
 

Provisions for benefits and claims

             
              

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

  $(210) $864   NM   (295)  1,285   NM 
              

Income from continuing operations before taxes

  $3,559  $3,955   (10)%  9,536   14,213   (33)%

Income taxes

   940   1,143   (18)  2,770   4,361   (36)
              

Income from continuing operations

  $2,619  $2,812   (7)%  6,766   9,852   (31)%

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

   20   3   NM   46     
              

Net income

  $2,599  $2,809   (7)%  6,720   9,852   (32)%
              

Average assets (in billions of dollars)

  $944  $835   13%  935   832   12%

Return on assets

   1.10%  1.35%     1.45%  2.39%   
              

Revenues by region

                   
 

North America

  $3,263  $2,377   37%  7,455   7,982   (7)%
 

EMEA

   2,610   3,418   (24)  5,958   8,484   (30)
 

Latin America

   914   1,389   (34)  1,865   2,532   (26)
 

Asia

   1,670   2,000   (17)  3,619   4,760   (24)
              

Total revenues

  $8,457  $9,184   (8)%  18,897   23,758   (20)%
              

Income from continuing operations by region

                   
 

North America

  $1,005  $149   NM   2,588   2,784   (7)%
 

EMEA

   673   1,096   (39)%  2,011   3,593   (44)
 

Latin America

   350   677   (48)  779   1,249   (38)
 

Asia

   591   890   (34)  1,388   2,226   (38)
              

Total income from continuing operations

  $2,619  $2,812   (7)%  6,766   9,852   (31)%
              

Average loans by region (in billions of dollars)

                   
 

North America

  $68  $55   24%         
 

EMEA

   37   48   (23)         
 

Latin America

   21   21            
 

Asia

   34   28   21          
              

Total average loans

  $160  $152   5%         
              

NM
Not meaningful

22


Table of Contents


SECURITIES AND BANKING

        Securities and Banking (S&B) offers a wide array of investment and commercial banking services and products for corporations, governments, institutional and retail investors, and ultra-high net worth individuals. S&B includes investment banking and advisory services, lending, debt and equity sales and trading, institutional brokerage, foreign exchange, structured products, cash instruments and related derivatives, and private banking. S&B revenue is generated primarily from fees for investment banking and advisory services, fees and interest on loans, fees and spread on foreign exchange, structured products, cash instruments and related derivatives, income earned on principal transactions, and fees and spreads on private banking services.

 
 Second Quarter   
 Six Months   
 
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars 2010  2009  2010  2009  

Net interest revenue

  $2,570  $3,179   (19)% $5,135  $6,442   (20)%

Non-interest revenue

   3,385   3,522   (4)  8,823   12,459   (29)
              

Revenues, net of interest expense

  $5,955  $6,701   (11)% $13,958  $18,901   (26)%

Total operating expenses

   3,938   3,277   20   7,335   6,098   20 
 

Net credit losses

   42   172   (76)  143   246   (42)
 

Provisions for unfunded lending commitments

   (22)  83   NM   (29)  115   NM 
 

Credit reserve build (release)

   (196)  604   NM   (358)  918   NM 
 

Provisions for benefits and claims

             
              

Provisions for credit losses and benefits and claims

  $(176) $859   NM  $(244) $1,279   NM 
              

Income before taxes and noncontrolling interests

  $2,193  $2,565   (15)% $6,867  $11,524   (40)%

Income taxes (benefits)

   508   727   (30)  1,976   3,550   (44)

Income from continuing operations

   1,685   1,838   (8)  4,891   7,974   (39)

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

   15       36   1   NM 
              

Net income

  $1,670  $1,838   (9)% $4,855  $7,973   (39)%
              

Average assets (in billions of dollars)

  $877  $776   13% $869  $773   12%

Return on assets

   0.76%  0.95%     1.13%  2.08%   
              

Revenues by region

                   
 

North America

  $2,627  $1,721   53% $6,180  $6,737   (8)%
 

EMEA

   1,762   2,558   (31)  4,277   6,780   (37)
 

Latin America

   558   1,049   (47)  1,165   1,849   (37)
 

Asia

   1,008   1,373   (27)  2,336   3,535   (34)
              

Total revenues

  $5,955  $6,701   (11)% $13,958  $18,901   (26)%
              

Income (loss) from continuing operations by region

                   
 

North America

  $839   (32)  NM  $2,263  $2,465   (8)%
 

EMEA

   355   746   (52)%  1,387   2,917   (52)
 

Latin America

   197   527   (63)  469   939   (50)
 

Asia

   294   597   (51)  772   1,653   (53)
              

Total income from continuing operations

  $1,685   1,838   (8)% $4,891  $7,974   (39)%
              

Securities and Banking revenue details

                   
 

Fixed income markets

  $3,713   5,569   (33)% $9,093  $15,592   (42)%
 

Total investment banking

   674   1,161   (42)  1,731   2,144   (19)
 

Equity markets

   652   1,101   (41)  1,865   2,706   (31)
 

Lending

   522   (1,104)  NM   765   (1,467)  NM 
 

Private bank

   512   481   6   1,006   985   2 
 

Other Securities and Banking

   (118)  (507)  77   (502)  (1,059)  53 
              

Total Securities and Banking revenues

  $5,955   6,701   (11)% $13,958  $18,901   (26)%
              

NM
Not meaningful

2Q10 vs. 2Q09

        Revenues, net of interest expense, were $6.0 billion, compared to $6.7 billion in the prior-year quarter, resulting from a decrease in fixed income markets, equity markets and investment banking revenues, partially offset by an increase in lending and private bank revenues. Fixed income markets revenues (excluding credit value adjustment (CVA), net of hedges, of $0.2 billion and $(0.2) billion in the current period and prior-year quarter, respectively) declined $2.3 billion to $3.5 billion, with a majority of the decline coming from weaker results in Credit Products and Securitized Products, which reflected a challenging market environment. Equity markets revenues (excluding CVA of $32 million and $(0.7) billion in the current period and prior-year quarter, respectively) declined $1.2 billion to $0.6 billion, driven by lower results in Derivatives, reflecting lower market and client volumes, and increased volatility. CVA increased $1.2 billion to $0.3 billion, mainly due to a widening of Citigroup spreads throughout the current quarter, compared to a contraction in the prior-year quarter. Investment banking revenues

23


Table of Contents

decreased $0.5 billion to $0.7 billion, also reflecting lower client market activity levels. Debt and equity underwriting revenues declined, reflecting lower overall issuance volumes, and advisory revenues decreased due to fewer completed deals, as a number of anticipated closings were moved out of the second quarter of 2010. Lending revenues increased from $(1.1) billion to $0.5 billion, driven by gains from spread widening on credit default swap hedges.

        Operating expenses increased 20% to $3.9 billion, mainly driven by the U.K. bonus tax of approximately $400 million. Expenses in the current quarter also reflected select investments in the businesses.

        Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims decreased by $1.0 billion to $(176) million, primarily attributable to the impact of a $218 million credit reserve release in the current quarter, compared to a $687 million build in the prior-year quarter, as improvements continued in the corporate loan portfolio.

2Q10 YTD vs. 2Q09 YTD

        Revenues, net of interest expense, were $14.0 billion, compared to $18.9 billion for the prior-year period, which was driven by a particularly strong 2009 first half due to robust fixed income markets and CVA. The decrease was partially offset by an increase in lending revenues, due to gains from spread widening on credit default swap hedges.

        Operating expenses increased 20% to $7.3 billion, mainly driven by the U.K. bonus tax, higher transaction and compensation costs, and a litigation reserve release in the first half of 2009.

        Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims decreased by $1.5 billion to $(244) million, primarily attributable to the impact of a $387 million credit reserve release in the first half of 2010, compared to a $1.0 billion build in the prior-year period, as improvements continued in the corporate loan portfolio.

24


Table of Contents


TRANSACTION SERVICES

        Transaction Services is composed of Treasury and Trade Solutions (TTS) and Securities and Fund Services (SFS). TTS provides comprehensive cash management and trade finance for corporations, financial institutions and public sector entities worldwide. SFS provides custody and funds services to investors such as insurance companies and mutual funds, clearing services to intermediaries such as broker-dealers, and depository and agency/trust services to multinational corporations and governments globally. Revenue is generated from net interest revenue on deposits in TTS and SFS, as well as from trade loans and from fees for transaction processing and fees on assets under custody in SFS.

 
 Second Quarter   
 Six Months   
 
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars 2010  2009  2010  2009  

Net interest revenue

  $1,398  $1,455   (4)% $2,786  $2,861   (3)%

Non-interest revenue

   1,104   1,028   7   2,153   1,996   8 
              

Total revenues, net of interest expense

  $2,502  $2,483   1% $4,939  $4,857   2%

Total operating expenses

   1,170   1,088   8   2,321   2,162   7 

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims

   (34)  5   NM   (51)  6   NM 
              

Income before taxes and noncontrolling interests

  $1,366  $1,390   (2)% $2,669  $2,689   (1)%

Income taxes

   432   416   4   794   811   (2)

Income from continuing operations

   934   974   (4)  1,875   1,878   

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

   5   3   67   10   (1)  NM 
              

Net income

  $929  $971   (4)% $1,865  $1,879   (1)%
              

Average assets (in billions of dollars)

  $67  $59   14% $66  $59   12%

Return on assets

   5.56%  6.60%     5.70%  6.42%   
              

Revenues by region

                   
 

North America

  $636  $656   (3)% $1,275  $1,245   2%
 

EMEA

   848   860   (1)  1,681   1,704   (1)
 

Latin America

   356   340   5   700   683   2 
 

Asia

   662   627   6   1,283   1,225   5 
              

Total revenues

  $2,502  $2,483   1% $4,939  $4,857   2%
              

Revenue Details

                   
 

Treasury and Trade Solutions

  $1,805  $1,793   1% $3,586  $3,543   1%
 

Securities and Fund Services

   697   690   1   1,353   1,314   3 
              

Total revenues

  $2,502  $2,483   1% $4,939  $4,857   2%
              

Income from continuing operations by region

                   
 

North America

  $166  $181   (8)% $325  $319   2%
 

EMEA

   318   350   (9)  624   676   (8)
 

Latin America

   153   150   2   310   310   
 

Asia

   297   293   1   616   573   8 
              

Total income from continuing operations

  $934  $974   (4)% $1,875  $1,878   
              

Key indicators (in billions of dollars)

                   

Average deposits and other customer liability balances

  $320  $288   11%         

EOP assets under custody (in trillions of dollars)

   11.3   11.4   (1)         
              

NM
Not meaningful

2Q10 vs. 2Q09

        Revenues, net of interest expense, grew 1%, as improvement in fees in both the TTS and SFS businesses more than offset spread compression. TTS revenue increased 1%, driven primarily by growth in Trade and Cards businesses. SFS revenues increased 1%, driven by higher volumes and increased client activity.

        Operating expenses increased 8%, primarily due to continued investment spending required to support future business growth, as well as higher transaction-related costs and the U.K. bonus tax.

        Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims declined by $39 million, primarily attributable to a credit reserve release of $35 million.

2Q10 YTD vs. 2Q09 YTD

        Revenues, net of interest expense, grew 2% as improvement in fees in both the TTS and SFS businesses more than offset spread compression. TTS revenue increased 1%, driven primarily by growth in Trade and Cards businesses. SFS revenues increased 3%, driven by higher volumes and client activity.

        Operating expenses increased 7%, primarily due to continued investment spending required to support future business growth, as well as higher transaction related costs and the U.K. bonus tax.

        Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims declined by $57 million, primarily attributable to a credit reserve release of $53 million.

25


Table of Contents


CITI HOLDINGS

        Citi Holdings contains businesses and portfolios of assets that Citigroup has determined are not central to its core Citicorp businesses. These noncore businesses tend to be more asset intensive and reliant on wholesale funding and also may be product-driven rather than client-driven. Citi intends to exit these businesses as quickly as practicable in an economically rational manner through business divestitures, portfolio run-offs and asset sales. Citi has made substantial progress divesting and exiting businesses from Citi Holdings, having completed more than 20 divestiture transactions since the beginning of 2009 through June 30, 2010, including Smith Barney, Nikko Cordial Securities, Nikko Asset Management, Primerica Financial Services, Credit Card businesses and Diners Club North America. Citi Holdings' GAAP assets have been reduced by approximately 20%, or $117 billion, from the second quarter of 2009, and 44% from the peak in the first quarter of 2008. Citi Holdings' GAAP assets of $465 billion represent approximately 24% of Citi's assets as of June 30, 2010. Citi Holdings' risk-weighted assets of approximately $400 billion represent approximately 40% of Citi's risk-weighted assets as of June 30, 2010. Asset reductions from Citi Holdings have the combined benefits of further fortifying Citigroup's capital base, lowering risk, simplifying the organization and allowing Citi to allocate capital to fund long-term strategic businesses.

        Citi Holdings consists of the following businesses: Brokerage and Asset Management, Local Consumer Lending, and Special Asset Pool.

 
 Second Quarter   
 Six Months   
 
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars 2010  2009  2010  2009  

Net interest revenue

  $3,971  $4,162   (5)% $8,346  $9,219   (9)%

Non-interest revenue

   948   11,163   (92)  3,123   9,200   (66)
              

Total revenues, net of interest expense

  $4,919  $15,325   (68)% $11,469  $18,419   (38)%
              

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

                   

Net credit losses

  $4,998  $6,781   (26)% $10,239  $12,808   (20)%

Credit reserve build (release)

   (800)  2,645   NM   (460)  4,282   NM 
              

Provision for loan losses

  $4,198  $9,426   (55)% $9,779  $17,090   (43)%

Provision for benefits and claims

   185   267   (31)  428   557   (23)

Provision for unfunded lending commitments

   (45)  52   NM   (71)  80   NM 
              

Total provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

  $4,338  $9,745   (55)% $10,136  $17,727   (43)%
              

Total operating expenses

  $2,424  $3,609   (33)% $4,998  $7,794   (36)%
              

Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes

  $(1,843) $1,971   NM  $(3,665) $(7,102)  48%

Income taxes (benefits)

   (646)  789   NM   (1,592)  (2,799)  43 
              

Income (loss) from continuing operations

  $(1,197) $1,182   NM  $(2,073) $(4,303)  52%

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

   8   (37)  NM   19   (48)  NM 
              

Net income (loss)

  $(1,205) $1,219   NM  $(2,092) $(4,255)  51%
              

Balance sheet data (in billions of dollars)

                   

Total EOP assets

  $465  $582   (20)%         
              

Total EOP deposits

  $82  $84   (2)%         
              

Total GAAP Revenues

  $4,919  $15,325   (68)% $11,469  $18,419   (38)%
 

Net Impact of Credit Card Securitization Activity(1)

     1,482   NM     2,450   NM 
              

Total Managed Revenues

  $4,919  $16,807   (71)% $11,469  $20,869   (45)%
              

GAAP Net Credit Losses

  $4,998  $6,781   (26)% $10,239  $12,808   (20)%
 

Impact of Credit Card Securitization Activity(1)

     1,278   NM     2,335   NM 
              

Total Managed Net Credit Losses

  $4,998  $8,059   (38)% $10,239  $15,143   (32)%
              

(1)
See discussion of adoption of SFAS 166/167 on page 3 and in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

NM
Not meaningful

26


Table of Contents


BROKERAGE AND ASSET MANAGEMENT

        Brokerage and Asset Management (BAM), which constituted approximately 6% of Citi Holdings by assets as of June 30, 2010, consists of Citi's global retail brokerage and asset management businesses. This segment was substantially affected by, and reduced in size in 2009, due to the sale of Smith Barney (SB) to the MSSB JV and Nikko Cordial Securities. At June 30, 2010, BAM had approximately $30 billion of assets, primarily consisting of Citi's investment in, and assets related to, the MSSB JV. Morgan Stanley has options to purchase Citi's remaining stake in the MSSB JV over three years starting in 2012.

 
 Second Quarter   
 Six Months   
 
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars 2010  2009  2010  2009  

Net interest revenue

  $(71) $162   NM  $(136) $526   NM 

Non-interest revenue

   212   12,058   (98)%  617   13,301   (95)%
              

Total revenues, net of interest expense

  $141  $12,220   (99)% $481  $13,827   (97)%
              

Total operating expenses

  $258  $1,044   (75)% $523  $2,543   (79)%
              
 

Net credit losses

  $1  $    $12  $   
 

Credit reserve build (release)

   (3)  3   NM   (10)  46   NM 
 

Provision for benefits and claims

   9   8   13%  18   19   (5)%
 

Provision for unfunded lending commitments

   (6)      (6)    
              

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

  $1  $11   (91)% $14  $65   (78)%
              

Income from continuing operations before taxes

  $(118) $11,165   NM  $(56) $11,219   (100)%

Income taxes (benefits)

   (30)  4,390   NM   (49)  4,410   NM 
              

Income from continuing operations

  $(88) $6,775   NM  $(7) $6,809   (100)%

Net (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

   7   6   17%  2   (11)  NM 
              

Net income (loss)

  $(95) $6,769   NM  $(9) $6,820   (100)%
              

EOP assets (in billions of dollars)

  $30  $51   (41)%         

EOP deposits (in billions of dollars)

   57   56   2          
              

NM    Not meaningful

2Q10 vs. 2Q09

        Revenues, net of interest expense, decreased 99% primarily due to the absence of the $11.1 billion pre-tax gain on sale ($6.7 billion after-tax) on the sale of SB which closed on June 1, 2009. Excluding the gain, revenue declined $1.0 billion, or 88%, driven primarily by the absence of SB revenues.

        Operating expenses decreased 75% from the prior-year quarter, mainly due to the absence of SB expenses.

        Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims declined 91%, mainly reflecting lower reserve builds of $6 million and lower provisions for unfunded lending commitments of $6 million.

        Assets declined 41% versus the prior year, primarily driven by the sale of Nikko Cordial Securities and Nikko Asset Management.

2Q10 YTD vs. 2Q09 YTD

        Revenues, net of interest expense, decreased 97% primarily due to the absence of the $11.1 billion pre-tax gain on the sale of SB ($6.7 billion after-tax) which closed on June 1, 2009. Excluding the gain, revenue declined $2.3 billion, or 83%, driven primarily by the absence of SB revenues.

        Operating expenses decreased 79% from the prior-year period, primarily driven by the absence of expenses from the SB and Nikko businesses.

        Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims declined 78% primarily due to lower reserve builds of $56 million, partially offset by increased net credit losses of $12 million.

27


Table of Contents


LOCAL CONSUMER LENDING

        Local Consumer Lending (LCL), which constituted approximately 70% of Citi Holdings by assets as of June 30, 2010, includes a portion of Citigroup's North American mortgage business, retail partner cards, Western European cards and retail banking, CitiFinancial North America, Student Loan Corporation and other local consumer finance businesses globally. At June 30, 2010, LCL had $323 billion of assets ($294 billion in North America). Approximately $143 billion of assets in LCL as of June 30, 2010 consisted of U.S. mortgages in the company's CitiMortgage and CitiFinancial operations. The North American assets consist of residential mortgage loans (first and second mortgages), retail partner card loans, student loans, personal loans, auto loans, commercial real estate, and other consumer loans and assets.

 
 Second Quarter   
 Six Months   
 
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars 2010  2009  2010  2009  

Net interest revenue

  $3,688  $3,185   16% $7,708  $6,889   12%

Non-interest revenue

   518   296   75   1,168   2,613   (55)
              

Total revenues, net of interest expense(1)

  $4,206  $3,481   21% $8,876  $9,502   (7)%
              

Total operating expenses

  $2,046  $2,376   (14)% $4,224  $4,846   (13)%
              
 

Net credit losses

  $4,535  $5,144   (12)% $9,473  $9,661   (2)%
 

Credit reserve build (release)

   (421)  2,784   NM   (35)  4,346   NM 
 

Provision for benefits and claims

   176   259   (32)  410   538   (24)
 

Provision for unfunded lending commitments

             
              

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

  $4,290  $8,187   (48)% $9,848  $14,545   (32)%
              

Income (Loss) from continuing operations before taxes

  $(2,130) $(7,082)  70% $(5,196) $(9,889)  47%

Income taxes (benefits)

   (900)  (2,735)  67   (2,128)  (3,971)  46 
              

Income (Loss) from continuing operations

  $(1,230) $(4,347)  72% $(3,068) $(5,918)  48%

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

   7   5   40   7   11   (36)
              

Net income (loss)

  $(1,237) $(4,352)  72% $(3,075) $(5,929)  48%
              

Average assets (in billions of dollars)

  $333  $358   (7)% $344  $363   (5)%
              

Net credit losses as a percentage of average managed loans(2)

   6.03%  7.48%            
              

Revenue by business

                   
 

International

  $444  $689   (36)% $779  $2,713   (71)%
 

Retail Partner Cards

   2,113   789   NM   4,319   2,316   86 
 

North America (ex Cards)

   1,649   2,003   (18)  3,778   4,473   (16)
              
  

Total GAAP Revenues

  $4,206  $3,481   21% $8,876  $9,502   (7)%
 

Net impact of credit card securitization activity(1)

     1,482   NM     2,450   NM 
              
 

Total Managed Revenues

  $4,206  $4,963   (15)% $8,876  $11,952   (26)%
              

Net Credit Losses by business

                   
 

International

  $495  $962   (49)% $1,107  $1,780   (38)%
 

Retail partner cards

   1,775   872   NM   3,707   1,773   NM 
 

North America (ex Cards)

   2,265   3,310   (32)  4,659   6,108   (24)
              
  

Total GAAP net credit losses

  $4,535  $5,144   (12)% $9,473  $9,661   (2)%
 

Net impact of credit card securitization activity(1)

     1,278   NM     2,335   NM 
              
 

Total Managed Net Credit Losses

  $4,535  $6,422   (29)% $9,473  $11,996   (21)%
              

(1)
See discussion of adoption of SFAS 166/167 on page 3 and in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

(2)
See "Managed Presentations" below.

NM    Not meaningful

2Q10 vs. 2Q09

        Revenues, net of interest expense, increased 21%, due to the adoption of SFAS 166/167, partially offset by lower balances due to portfolio run-off, asset sales and divestitures, and a higher mortgage repurchase reserve. Net interest revenue increased 16%, primarily due to the adoption of SFAS 166/167, partially offset by the impact of lower balances.

        Operating expenses declined 14%, due to the impact of divestitures, lower volumes, re-engineering benefits and the absence of costs associated with the U.S. government loss-sharing agreement, which was exited in the fourth quarter of 2009. These items were partially offset by higher restructuring expense in the current quarter due to the previously announced restructuring of Citi Financial.

        Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims decreased 48% from the prior quarter, reflecting a reserve release of $421 million, principally related to U.S. retail partner cards, in the current quarter, compared to a reserve build in the prior-year quarter of $2.8 billion. Lower net credit losses were partially offset by the impact of the adoption of SFAS 166/167. On a managed basis, net credit losses declined for the fourth consecutive quarter, driven by improvement in the international portfolios as well as U.S. mortgages and retail partner cards.

        Assets declined 7% versus the prior year, primarily driven by portfolio run-off, higher loan loss reserve balances, and the impact of asset sales, partially offset by an increase of $41 billion resulting from the adoption of SFAS 166/167.

28


Table of Contents

2Q10 YTD vs. 2Q09 YTD

        Revenues, net of interest expense, decreased 7% from the prior-year period. Net interest revenue increased 12% due to the adoption of SFAS 166/167, partially offset by the impact of lower balances due to portfolio run-off and asset sales. Non-interest revenue declined 55%, primarily due to the absence of the $1.1 billion gain on sale of Redecard in first quarter of 2009 and a higher mortgage repurchase reserve in the second quarter.

        Operating expenses decreased 13%, primarily due to the impact of divestitures, lower volumes, re-engineering actions and the absence of costs associated with the U.S. government loss-sharing agreement, which was exited in the fourth quarter of 2009.

        Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims decreased 32%, reflecting a net $35 million reserve release in the first half of 2010 compared to a $4.3 billion build in the comparable period of 2009. Lower net credit losses across most businesses were partially offset by the impact of the adoption of SFAS 166/167. On a managed basis, net credit losses were lower, driven by improvement in the international portfolios, as well as U.S. mortgages and retail partner cards.

        Assets declined 5% versus the prior-year period, primarily driven by portfolio run-off, higher loan loss reserve balances, and the impact of asset sales and divestitures, partially offset by an increase of $41 billion resulting from the adoption of SFAS 166/167.

Managed Presentations

 
 Second Quarter  
 
 2010  2009  

Managed credit losses as a percentage of average managed loans

   6.03%  7.48%

Impact from credit card securitizations(1)

     (0.74)
      

Net credit losses as a percentage of average loans

   6.03%  6.74%
      

(1)
See discussion of adoption of SFAS 166/167 on page 3 and in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

29


Table of Contents


SPECIAL ASSET POOL

        Special Asset Pool (SAP), which constituted approximately 24% of Citi Holdings by assets as of June 30, 2010, is a portfolio of securities, loans and other assets that Citigroup intends to actively reduce over time through asset sales and portfolio run-off. At June 30, 2010, SAP had $112 billion of assets. SAP assets have declined by $216 billion, or 66%, from peak levels in the fourth quarter of 2007, reflecting cumulative asset sales, write-downs and portfolio run-off.

 
 Second Quarter   
 Six Months   
 
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars 2010  2009  2010  2009  

Net interest revenue

  $354  $815   (57)% $774  $1,804   (57)%

Non-interest revenue

   218   (1,191)  NM   1,338   (6,714)  NM 
              

Revenues, net of interest expense

  $572  $(376)  NM  $2,112  $(4,910)  NM 
              

Total operating expenses

  $120  $189   (37)% $251  $405   (38)%
              
 

Net credit losses

  $462  $1,637   (72)% $754  $3,147   (76)%
 

Provision for unfunded lending commitments

   (39)  52   NM   (65)  80   NM 
 

Credit reserve builds (release)

   (376)  (142)  NM   (415)  (110)  NM 
              

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

  $47  $1,547   (97)% $274  $3,117   (91)%
              

Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes

  $405  $(2,112)  NM  $1,587  $(8,432)  NM 

Income taxes (benefits)

   284   (866)  NM   585   (3,238)  NM 
              

Income (loss) from continuing operations

  $121  $(1,246)  NM  $1,002  $(5,194)  NM 

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

   (6)  (48)  88%  10   (48)  NM 
              

Net income (loss)

  $127  $(1,198)  NM  $992  $(5,146)  NM 
              

EOP assets (in billions of dollars)

  $112  $180   (38)%         
              

NM
Not meaningful

2Q10 vs. 2Q09

        Revenues, net of interest expense, increased $948 million, driven by an improvement in net revenue marks, partially offset by recording $176 million of negative revenues ($70 million of which were included in the net revenue marks) as a result of the reclassifying assets in held-to-maturity to fair value (see "Second Quarter 2010 Executive Summary" above and "Reclassification of Held-to-Maturity Securities to Available-for-Sale" below). Revenues in the current quarter included positive marks of $1.0 billion on subprime-related direct exposures and non-credit accretion of $383 million, partially offset by write-downs on commercial real estate of $174 million and on Alt-A mortgages of $163 million.

        Operating expenses decreased 37% driven by the absence of the U.S. government loss-sharing agreement, exited in the fourth quarter of 2009, and lower tax charges and compensation.

        Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims decreased 97%, primarily driven by lower net credit losses of $1.2 billion and a larger reserve release of $234 million.

        Assets declined 38% versus the prior-year quarter due to asset sales (including approximately $8 billion primarily through CDO liquidations), amortization and prepayments, partially offset by the impact of the adoption of SFAS 166/167.

2Q10 YTD vs. 2Q09 YTD

        Revenues, net of interest expense, increased $7.0 billion primarily due to favorable net revenue marks relative to the prior-year period. Revenue year-to-date includes positive marks of $1.9 billion on subprime-related direct exposures and non-credit accretion of $778 million, partially offset by write-downs on commercial real estate of $232 million and on Alt-A mortgages of $327 million.

        Operating expenses decreased 38% mainly driven by lower volumes, lower transaction expenses, and the absence of the U.S. government loss-sharing agreement, exited in the fourth quarter of 2009.

        Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims decreased 91%, primarily driven by a $2.4 billion decrease in net credit losses versus the prior-year period and higher reserve releases of $304 million.

30


Table of Contents

        The following table provides details of the composition of SAP assets as of June 30, 2010.

 
 Assets within Special Asset Pool as of
June 30, 2010
 
In billions of dollars Carrying
value
of assets
 Face value  Carrying value
as % of face
value
 

Securities in Available-for-Sale (AFS)

          
 

Corporates

  $7.7  $7.8   98%
 

Prime and non-U.S. mortgage-backed securities (MBS)

   7.1   8.6   83 
 

Auction rate securities (ARS)

   6.2   8.6   72 
 

Other securities(1)

   5.3   7.0   76 
 

Alt-A mortgages

   0.6   1.3   46 
        

Total securities in AFS

  $27.0  $33.3   81%
        

Securities in Held-to-Maturity (HTM)

          
 

Prime and non-U.S. MBS

  $8.3  $10.4   81%
 

Alt-A mortgages

   9.4   18.2   52 
 

Corporate securities

   6.1   7.0   87 
 

ARS

   1.0   1.2   78 
 

Other securities(2)

   3.3   4.3   76 
        

Total securities in HTM

  $28.1  $41.0   68%
        

Loans, leases and letters of credit (LCs) in Held-for-Investment (HFI)/Held-for-Sale (HFS)(3)

          
 

Corporates

  $11.1  $12.1   92%
 

Commercial real estate (CRE)

   8.0   8.9   90 
 

Other

   2.1   2.5   82 
 

Loan loss reserves

   (3.2)    NM 
        

Total loans, leases and LCs in HFI/HFS

  $18.0  $23.4   77%
        

Mark to market

          
 

Subprime securities

  $0.8  $4.9   17%
 

Other securities(4)

   5.8   29.5   20 
 

Derivatives

   7.2   NM   NM 
 

Loans, leases and letters of credit

   3.7   5.4   67 
 

Repurchase agreements

   6.2   NM   NM 
        

Total mark-to-market

  $23.7   NM   NM 
        

Highly leveraged finance commitments

  $2.0  $3.2   62%

Equities (excludes ARS in AFS)

   5.9   NM   NM 

Monolines

   0.4   NM   NM 

Consumer and other(5)

   6.7   NM   NM 
        

Total

  $111.7       
        

(1)
Includes assets previously held by Citi-advised structured investment vehicles (SIVs) that are not otherwise included in the categories above ($3.1 billion of asset-backed securities (ABS), collateralized debt obligations (CDO)/CLOs and government bonds), ABS ($1.0 billion) and municipals ($0.9 billion).

(2)
Includes assets previously held by Citi-advised SIVs that are not otherwise included in the categories above ($2.3 billion of ABS, CDOs/CLOs and government bonds).

(3)
HFS accounts for approximately $1.4 billion of the total.

(4)
Includes $1.4 billion of corporate securities.

(5)
Includes $1.7 billion of small business banking and finance loans and $1.0 billion of personal loans.

Notes: Assets previously held by the Citi-advised SIVs have been allocated to the corresponding asset categories above. SAP had total CRE assets of $11.3 billion at June 30, 2010.

Excludes Discontinued Operations.

Totals may not sum due to rounding.

NM    Not meaningful

31


Table of Contents

Items Impacting SAP Revenues

        The table below provides additional information regarding the net revenue marks affecting the SAP during the second quarters of 2010 and 2009.

 
 Pretax revenue  
In millions of dollars Second
Quarter
2010
 Second
Quarter
2009
 

Subprime-related direct exposures(1)

  $1,046  $613 

CVA related to exposure to monoline insurers

   35   157 

Alt-A mortgages(2)(3)

   (163)  (390)

CRE positions(2)(4)

   (174)  (213)

CVA on derivatives positions, excluding monoline insurers(2)

   (54)  219 

SIV assets

   (123)  50 

Private equity and equity investments

   31   (73)

Highly leveraged loans and financing commitments(5)

     (237)

ARS proprietary positions(6)

   (8)  

CVA on Citi debt liabilities under fair value option

   8   (156)
      

Subtotal

  $598  $(31)

Accretion on reclassified assets(7)

   383   501 
      

Total selected revenue items

  $981  $470 
      

(1)
Net of impact from hedges against direct subprime ABS CDO super senior positions.

(2)
Net of hedges.

(3)
For these purposes, Alt-A mortgage securities are non-agency residential MBS (RMBS) where (i) the underlying collateral has weighted average FICO scores between 680 and 720 or (ii) for instances where FICO scores are greater than 720, RMBS have 30% or less of the underlying collateral composed of full documentation loans.

(4)
Excludes CRE positions in SIV assets.

(5)
Net of underwriting fees.

(6)
Excludes write-downs of $2 million and $3 million in the second quarter of 2010 and 2009, respectively, from buy-backs of auction rate securities (ARS).

(7)
Recorded as net interest revenue.

        Totals may not sum due to rounding.

32


Table of Contents


CORPORATE/OTHER

        Corporate/Other includes global staff functions (includes finance, risk, human resources, legal and compliance) and other corporate expense, global operations and technology (O&T), residual Corporate Treasury and Corporate items. At June 30, 2010, this segment had approximately $262 billion of assets, consisting primarily of Citi's liquidity portfolio.

 
 Second Quarter  Six Months  
In millions of dollars 2010  2009  2010  2009  

Net interest revenue

  $326  $(107) $642  $(749)

Non-interest revenue

   337   (634)  370   508 
          

Total revenues, net of interest expense

  $663  $(741) $1,012  $(241)
          

Total operating expenses

  $352  $322  $811  $423 

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims

       1   2 
          

Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes

  $311  $(1,063) $200  $(666)

Income taxes (benefits)

   182   (1,032)  107   17 
          

(Loss) from continuing operations

  $129  $(31) $93  $(683)

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes

   (3)  (142)  208   (259)
          

Net income (loss) before attribution of noncontrolling interests

  $126  $(173) $301  $(942)

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

         (2)
          

Net income (loss)

  $126  $(173) $301  $(940)
          

2Q10 vs. 2Q09

        Revenues, net of interest expense, increased primarily due to reduced mark-to-market volatility in Treasury hedging activities, benefits from lower short-term interest rates and gains on credit default swap hedges.

2Q10 YTD vs. 2Q09 YTD

        Revenues, net of interest expense, increased due to improved Treasury results, the impact of lower short-term funding costs and gains on credit default swap hedges.

        Operating Expenses increased, primarily due to compensation-related costs, legal reserve charges and intersegment eliminations.

33


Table of Contents


SEGMENT BALANCE SHEET AT JUNE 30, 2010

In millions of dollars Regional
Consumer
Banking
 Institutional
Clients
Group
 Subtotal
Citicorp
 Citi
Holdings
 Corporate/Other,
Discontinued
Operations
and
Consolidating
Eliminations
 Total
Citigroup
Consolidated
 

Assets

                   
 

Cash and due from banks

  $8,074  $14,825  $22,899  $1,196  $614  $24,709 
 

Deposits with banks

   8,176   47,812   55,988   4,510   100,282   160,780 
 

Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell

   340   223,974   224,314   6,468   2   230,784 
 

Brokerage receivables

     25,424   25,424   11,045   403   36,872 
 

Trading account assets

   11,531   284,958   296,489   20,937   (8,014)  309,412 
 

Investments

   33,857   98,185   132,042   71,262   113,762   317,066 
 

Loans, net of unearned income

                   
 

Consumer

   216,966     216,966   288,480     505,446 
 

Corporate

     161,432   161,432   25,262   26   186,720 
              
 

Loans, net of unearned income

  $216,966  $161,432  $378,398  $313,742  $26  $692,166 
 

Allowance for loan losses

   (14,106)  (3,418)  (17,524)  (28,673)    (46,197)
              
 

Total loans, net

  $202,860  $158,014  $360,874  $285,069  $26  $645,969 
 

Goodwill

   10,070   10,473   20,543   4,658     25,201 
 

Intangible assets (other than MSRs)

   2,288   989   3,277   4,591     7,868 
 

Mortgage servicing rights (MSRs)

   1,890   70   1,960   2,934     4,894 
 

Other assets

   29,854   37,595   67,449   52,095   54,557   174,101 
              

Total assets

  $308,940  $902,319  $1,211,259  $464,765  $261,632  $1,937,656 
              

Liabilities and equity

                   
 

Total deposits

  $291,378  $427,314  $718,692  $82,163  $13,096  $813,951 
 

Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase

   3,812   191,922   195,734   233   145   196,112 
 

Brokerage payables

   134   54,069   54,203     571   54,774 
 

Trading account liabilities

   28   127,973   128,001   3,000     131,001 
 

Short-term borrowings

   143   56,844   56,987   6,035   29,730   92,752 
 

Long-term debt

   3,033   76,131   79,164   44,261   289,872   413,297 
 

Other liabilities

   17,344   16,531   33,875   22,006   22,558   78,439 
 

Net inter-segment funding (lending)

   (6,932)  (48,465)  (55,397)  307,067   (251,670)  
 

Total Citigroup stockholders' equity

          $154,806  $154,806 
 

Noncontrolling interest

           2,524   2,524 
              

Total equity

           157,330   157,330 
              

Total liabilities and equity

  $308,940  $902,319  $1,211,259  $464,765  $261,632  $1,937,656 
              

        The supplemental information presented above reflects Citigroup's consolidated GAAP balance sheet by reporting segment as of June 30, 2010. The respective segment information depicts the assets and liabilities managed by each segment as of such date. While this presentation is not defined by GAAP, Citi believes that these non-GAAP financial measures enhance investors' understanding of the balance sheet components managed by the underlying business segments, as well as the beneficial inter-relationship of the asset and liability dynamics of the balance sheet components among Citi's business segments.

34


Table of Contents


CAPITAL RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY

CAPITAL RESOURCES

Overview

        Historically, Citi has generated capital by earnings from its operating businesses. However, Citi may augment, and during the recent financial crisis did augment, its capital through issuances of common stock, convertible preferred stock, preferred stock, equity issued through awards under employee benefit plans, and, in the case of regulatory capital, through the issuance of subordinated debt underlying trust preferred securities. Further, the impact of future events on Citi's business results, such as corporate and asset dispositions, as well as changes in regulatory and accounting standards, also affect Citi's capital levels.

        Capital is used primarily to support assets in Citi's businesses and to absorb market, credit or operational losses. While capital may be used for other purposes, such as to pay dividends or repurchase common stock, Citi's ability to utilize its capital for these purposes is currently restricted due to its agreements with the U.S. government, generally for so long as the U.S. government continues to hold Citi's common stock or trust preferred securities.

        Citigroup's capital management framework is designed to ensure that Citigroup and its principal subsidiaries maintain sufficient capital consistent with Citi's risk profile and all applicable regulatory standards and guidelines, as well as external rating agency considerations. The capital management process is centrally overseen by senior management and is reviewed at the consolidated, legal entity and country levels.

        Senior management is responsible for the capital management process mainly through Citigroup's Finance and Asset and Liability Committee (FinALCO), with oversight from the Risk Management and Finance Committee of Citigroup's Board of Directors. The FinALCO is composed of the senior-most management of Citigroup for the purpose of engaging management in decision-making and related discussions on capital and liquidity matters. Among other things, FinALCO's responsibilities include: determining the financial structure of Citigroup and its principal subsidiaries; ensuring that Citigroup and its regulated entities are adequately capitalized in consultation with its regulators; determining appropriate asset levels and return hurdles for Citigroup and individual businesses; reviewing the funding and capital markets plan for Citigroup; and monitoring interest rate risk, corporate and bank liquidity, and the impact of currency translation on non-U.S. earnings and capital.

Capital Ratios

        Citigroup is subject to the risk-based capital guidelines issued by the Federal Reserve Board. Historically, capital adequacy has been measured, in part, based on two risk-based capital ratios, the Tier 1 Capital and Total Capital (Tier 1 Capital + Tier 2 Capital) ratios. Tier 1 Capital consists of the sum of "core capital elements," such as qualifying common stockholders' equity, as adjusted, qualifying noncontrolling interests, and qualifying mandatorily redeemable securities of subsidiary trusts, principally reduced by goodwill, other disallowed intangible assets, and disallowed deferred tax assets. Total Capital also includes "supplementary" Tier 2 Capital elements, such as qualifying subordinated debt and a limited portion of the allowance for credit losses. Both measures of capital adequacy are stated as a percentage of risk-weighted assets.

        In 2009, the U.S. banking regulators developed a new measure of capital termed "Tier 1 Common," which is defined as Tier 1 Capital less non-common elements, including qualifying perpetual preferred stock, qualifying noncontrolling interests, and qualifying mandatorily redeemable securities of subsidiary trusts. Tier 1 Common and related capital adequacy ratios are measures used and relied upon by U.S. banking regulators; however, they are non-GAAP financial measures for SEC purposes. See "Components of Capital Under Regulatory Guidelines" below.

        Citigroup's risk-weighted assets are principally derived from application of the risk-based capital guidelines related to the measurement of credit risk. Pursuant to these guidelines, on-balance-sheet assets and the credit equivalent amount of certain off-balance-sheet exposures (such as financial guarantees, unfunded lending commitments, letters of credit, and derivatives) are assigned to one of several prescribed risk-weight categories based upon the perceived credit risk associated with the obligor, or if relevant, the guarantor, the nature of the collateral, or external credit ratings. Risk-weighted assets also incorporate a measure for market risk on covered trading account positions and all foreign exchange and commodity positions whether or not carried in the trading account. Excluded from risk-weighted assets are any assets, such as goodwill and deferred tax assets, to the extent required to be deducted from regulatory capital. See "Components of Capital Under Regulatory Guidelines" below.

        Citigroup is also subject to a Leverage ratio requirement, a non-risk-based measure of capital adequacy, which is defined as Tier 1 Capital as a percentage of quarterly adjusted average total assets.

        To be "well capitalized" under current federal bank regulatory agency definitions, a bank holding company must have a Tier 1 Capital ratio of at least 6%, a Total Capital ratio of at least 10%, and a Leverage ratio of at least 3%, and not be subject to a Federal Reserve Board directive to maintain higher capital levels. The following table sets forth Citigroup's regulatory capital ratios as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.

35


Table of Contents

Citigroup Regulatory Capital Ratios

 
 Jun. 30,
2010
 Dec. 31,
2009
 

Tier 1 Common

   9.71%  9.60%

Tier 1 Capital

   11.99   11.67 

Total Capital (Tier 1 Capital + Tier 2 Capital)

   15.59   15.25 

Leverage

   6.31   6.87 
      

        As noted in the table above, Citigroup was "well capitalized" under the federal bank regulatory agency definitions as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.

Components of Capital Under Regulatory Guidelines

In millions of dollars June 30,
2010
 December 31,
2009
 

Tier 1 Common

       

Citigroup common stockholders' equity

  $154,494  $152,388 

Less: Net unrealized losses on securities available-for-sale, net of tax(1)

   (2,259)  (4,347)

Less: Accumulated net losses on cash flow hedges, net of tax

   (3,184)  (3,182)

Less: Pension liability adjustment, net of tax(2)

   (3,465)  (3,461)

Less: Cumulative effect included in fair value of financial liabilities attributable to the change in own credit worthiness, net of tax(3)

   973   760 

Less: Disallowed deferred tax assets(4)

   31,493   26,044 

Less: Intangible assets:

       
 

Goodwill

   25,213   25,392 
 

Other disallowed intangible assets

   5,393   5,899 

Other

   (776)  (788)
      

Total Tier 1 Common

  $99,554  $104,495 
      

Qualifying perpetual preferred stock

  $312  $312 

Qualifying mandatorily redeemable securities of subsidiary trusts

   20,091   19,217 

Qualifying noncontrolling interests

   1,077   1,135 

Other

   1,875   1,875 
      

Total Tier 1 Capital

  $122,909  $127,034 
      

Tier 2 Capital

       

Allowance for credit losses(5)

  $13,275  $13,934 

Qualifying subordinated debt(6)

   22,825   24,242 

Net unrealized pretax gains on available-for-sale equity securities(1)

   743   773 
      

Total Tier 2 Capital

  $36,843  $38,949 
      

Total Capital (Tier 1 Capital and Tier 2 Capital)

  $159,752  $165,983 
      

Risk-weighted assets(7)

  $1,024,929  $1,088,526 
      

(1)
Tier 1 Capital excludes net unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale debt securities and net unrealized gains on available-for-sale equity securities with readily determinable fair values, in accordance with risk-based capital guidelines. In arriving at Tier 1 Capital, banking organizations are required to deduct net unrealized losses on available-for-sale equity securities with readily determinable fair values, net of tax. Banking organizations are permitted to include in Tier 2 Capital up to 45% of net unrealized pretax gains on available-for-sale equity securities with readily determinable fair values.

(2)
The Federal Reserve Board granted interim capital relief for the impact of ASC 715-20, Compensation—Retirement Benefits—Defined Benefits Plans (formerly SFAS 158).

(3)
The impact of including Citigroup's own credit rating in valuing financial liabilities for which the fair value option has been elected is excluded from Tier 1 Capital, in accordance with risk-based capital guidelines.

(4)
Of Citi's approximately $49.9 billion of net deferred tax assets at June 30, 2010, approximately $15.1 billion of such assets were includable without limitation in regulatory capital pursuant to risk-based capital guidelines, while approximately $31.5 billion of such assets exceeded the limitation imposed by these guidelines and, as "disallowed deferred tax assets," were deducted in arriving at Tier 1 Capital. Citigroup's approximately $3.3 billion of other net deferred tax assets primarily represented approximately $1.2 billion of deferred tax effects of unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale debt securities and approximately $2.1 billion of deferred tax effects of the pension liability adjustment, which are permitted to be excluded prior to deriving the amount of net deferred tax assets subject to limitation under the guidelines. Citi had approximately $26 billion of disallowed deferred tax assets at December 31, 2009.

(5)
Includable up to 1.25% of risk-weighted assets. Any excess allowance for credit losses is deducted in arriving at risk-weighted assets.

(6)
Includes qualifying subordinated debt in an amount not exceeding 50% of Tier 1 Capital.

(7)
Includes risk-weighted credit equivalent amounts, net of applicable bilateral netting agreements, of $59.8 billion for interest rate, commodity, and equity derivative contracts, foreign exchange contracts, and credit derivatives as of June 30, 2010, compared with $64.5 billion as of December 31, 2009. Market risk equivalent assets included in risk-weighted assets amounted to $63.6 billion at June 30, 2010 and $80.8 billion at December 31, 2009. Risk-weighted assets also include the effect of certain other off-balance-sheet exposures, such as unused lending commitments and letters of credit, and reflect deductions such as certain intangible assets and any excess allowance for credit losses.

36


Table of Contents

Adoption of SFAS 166/167 Impact on Capital

        The adoption of SFAS 166/167 had a significant and immediate impact on Citigroup's capital ratios as of January 1, 2010.

        As described further in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, the adoption of SFAS 166/167 resulted in the consolidation of $137 billion of incremental assets and $146 billion of liabilities onto Citigroup's Consolidated Balance Sheet, including securitized credit card receivables on the date of adoption, January 1, 2010. The adoption of SFAS 166/167 also resulted in a net increase of $10 billion in risk-weighted assets. In addition, Citi added $13.4 billion to the loan loss allowance, increased deferred tax assets by $5.0 billion, and reduced retained earnings by $8.4 billion. This translated into a reduction in Tangible Common Equity of $8.4 billion, and a decrease in Tier 1 Common, Tier 1 Capital, and Total Capital of $14.2 billion, $14.2 billion and $14.0 billion, respectively, which were partially offset by net income of $4.4 billion and $2.3 billion of qualifying mandatorily redeemable securities of subsidiary trusts issued during the first quarter of 2010.

        The impact on Citigroup's capital ratios from the January 1, 2010 adoption of SFAS 166/167 was as follows:

As of January 1, 2010 Impact  

Tier 1 Common

  (138) bps

Tier 1 Capital

  (141) bps

Total Capital

  (142) bps

Leverage

  (118) bps
    

TCE (TCE/RWA)

  (87) bps

        For more information, see Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements below.

Common Stockholders' Equity

        Citigroup's common stockholders' equity increased during the six months ended June 30, 2010 by $2.1 billion to $154.5 billion, and represented 8.0% of total assets as of June 30, 2010. Citigroup's common stockholders' equity was $152.4 billion, which represented 8.2% of total assets, at December 31, 2009.

        The table below summarizes the change in Citigroup's common stockholders' equity during the first six months of 2010:

In billions of dollars  
 

Common stockholders' equity, December 31, 2009

  $152.4 

Transition adjustment to retained earnings associated with the adoption of SFAS 166/167 (as of January 1, 2010)

   (8.4)

Net income

   7.1 

Employee benefit plans and other activities

   1.7 

ADIA Upper DECs equity units purchase contract

   1.9 

Net change in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax

   (0.2)
    

Common stockholders' equity, June 30, 2010

  $154.5 
    

        As of June 30, 2010, $6.7 billion of stock repurchases remained under Citi's authorized repurchase programs. No material repurchases were made in the first six months of 2010, or the year ended December 31, 2009. For so long as the U.S. government holds any Citigroup common stock or trust preferred securities, Citigroup has generally agreed not to acquire, repurchase or redeem any Citigroup equity or trust preferred securities, other than pursuant to administering its employee benefit plans or other customary exceptions, or with the consent of the U.S. government.

Tangible Common Equity (TCE)

        TCE, as defined by Citigroup, represents Common equity less Goodwill and Intangible assets (other than Mortgage Servicing Rights (MSRs)), net of the related net deferred taxes. Other companies may calculate TCE in a manner different from that of Citigroup. Citi's TCE was $121.3 billion at June 30, 2010 and $118.2 billion at December 31, 2009.

        The TCE ratio (TCE divided by risk-weighted assets) was 11.8% at June 30, 2010 and 10.9% at December 31, 2009.

        TCE is a capital adequacy metric used and relied upon by industry analysts; however, it is a non-GAAP financial measure for SEC purposes. A reconciliation of Citigroup's total stockholders' equity to TCE follows:

In millions of dollars June 30,
2010
 Dec. 31,
2009
 

Total Citigroup stockholders' equity

  $154,806  $152,700 

Less:

       
 

Preferred stock

   312   312 
      

Common equity

  $154,494  $152,388 

Less:

       
 

Goodwill

   25,201   25,392 
 

Intangible assets (other than MSRs)

   7,868   8,714 
 

Goodwill-recorded as assets held for sale in Other assets

   12   
 

Intangible assets (other than MSRs)— recorded as assets held for sale in Other assets

   54   
 

Related net deferred tax assets

   62   68 
      

Tangible common equity (TCE)

  $121,297  $118,214 
      

Tangible assets

       

GAAP assets

  $1,937,656  $1,856,646 
 

Less:

       
  

Goodwill

   25,201   25,392 
  

Intangible assets (other than MSRs)

   7,868   8,714 
  

Goodwill-recorded as assets held for sale in Other assets

   12   
  

Intangible assets (other than MSRs)— recorded as assets held for sale in Other assets

   54   
  

Related deferred tax assets

   365   386 

Federal bank regulatory reclassification

     5,746 
      

Tangible assets (TA)

  $1,904,156  $1,827,900 
      

Risk-weighted assets (RWA)

  $1,024,929  $1,088,526 
      

TCE/TA ratio

   6.37%  6.47%
      

TCE/RWA ratio

   11.83%  10.86%
      

37


Table of Contents

Capital Resources of Citigroup's Depository Institutions

        Citigroup's U.S. subsidiary depository institutions are subject to risk-based capital guidelines issued by their respective primary federal bank regulatory agencies, which are similar to the guidelines of the Federal Reserve Board. To be "well capitalized" under current regulatory definitions, Citigroup's depository institutions must have a Tier 1 Capital ratio of at least 6%, a Total Capital (Tier 1 Capital + Tier 2 Capital) ratio of at least 10%, and a Leverage ratio of at least 5%, and not be subject to a regulatory directive to meet and maintain higher capital levels.

        At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, all of Citigroup's U.S. subsidiary depository institutions were "well capitalized" under federal bank regulatory agency definitions, including Citigroup's primary depository institution, Citibank, N.A., as noted in the following table:

Citibank, N.A. Components of Capital and Ratios Under Regulatory Guidelines

In billions of dollars Jun. 30,
2010
 Dec. 31,
2009
 

Tier 1 Capital

  $101.1  $96.8 

Total Capital (Tier 1 Capital + Tier 2 Capital)

   114.6   110.6 
      

Tier 1 Capital ratio

   14.16%  13.16%

Total Capital ratio

   16.04   15.03 

Leverage ratio(1)

   8.90   8.31 
      

(1)
Tier 1 Capital divided by each period's quarterly adjusted average total assets.

        Similar to pending changes to capital standards applicable to Citigroup and its broker-dealer subsidiaries, as discussed below, the capital requirements applicable to Citigroup's subsidiary depository institutions may be subject to change in light of actions currently being considered at both the legislative and regulatory levels.

        There are various legal and regulatory limitations on the ability of Citigroup's subsidiary depository institutions to pay dividends, extend credit or otherwise supply funds to Citigroup and its non-bank subsidiaries. In determining the declaration of dividends, each depository institution must also consider its effect on applicable risk-based capital and Leverage ratio requirements, as well as policy statements of the federal regulatory agencies that indicate that banking organizations should generally pay dividends out of current operating earnings. Citigroup did not receive any dividends from its bank subsidiaries during the first six months of 2010.

38


Table of Contents

        The following table presents the estimated sensitivity of Citigroup's and Citibank, N.A.'s capital ratios to changes of $100 million in Tier 1 Common, Tier 1 Capital, or Total Capital (numerator), or changes of $1 billion in risk-weighted assets or adjusted average total assets (denominator) based on financial information as of June 30, 2010. This information is provided for the purpose of analyzing the impact that a change in Citigroup's or Citibank, N.A.'s financial position or results of operations could have on these ratios. These sensitivities only consider a single change to either a component of capital, risk-weighted assets, or adjusted average total assets. Accordingly, an event that affects more than one factor may have a larger basis point impact than is reflected in this table.

 
 Tier 1 Common ratio  Tier 1 Capital ratio  Total Capital ratio  Leverage ratio  
 
 Impact of $100
million change in
Tier 1 Common
 Impact of $1
billion change in
risk-weighted
assets
 Impact of $100
million change in
Tier 1 Capital
 Impact of $1
billion change in
risk-weighted
assets
 Impact of $100
million change in
Total Capital
 Impact of $1
billion change in
risk-weighted
assets
 Impact of $100
million change in
Tier 1 Capital
 Impact of $1
billion change in
adjusted average
total assets
 

Citigroup

  1.0 bps  0.9 bps  1.0 bps  1.2 bps  1.0 bps  1.5bps  0.5 bps  0.3 bps 
                  

Citibank, N.A. 

      1.4 bps  2.0 bps  1.4 bps  2.2 bps  0.9 bps  0.8 bps 
                  

Broker-Dealer Subsidiaries

        At June 30, 2010, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., a broker-dealer registered with the SEC that is an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc. (CGMHI), had net capital, computed in accordance with the SEC's net capital rule, of $8.3 billion, which exceeded the minimum requirement by $7.6 billion.

        In addition, certain of Citi's broker-dealer subsidiaries are subject to regulation in the other countries in which they do business, including requirements to maintain specified levels of net capital or its equivalent. Citigroup's broker-dealer subsidiaries were in compliance with their capital requirements at June 30, 2010.

        Similar to pending changes to capital standards applicable to Citigroup, as discussed under "Regulatory Capital Standards Developments" below, net capital requirements applicable to Citigroup's broker-dealer subsidiaries in the U.S. and other jurisdictions may be subject to change in light of the recently enacted Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Financial Reform Act) and other actions currently being considered at both the legislative and regulatory levels. Citi continues to monitor these developments closely.

Regulatory Capital Standards Developments

        The prospective regulatory capital standards for financial institutions are currently subject to significant debate, rulemaking activity and uncertainty, both in the U.S. as well as internationally. Citi continues to monitor these developments closely.

        Basel II and III.    In late 2005, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (Basel Committee) published a new set of risk-based capital standards (Basel II) which would permit banks, including Citigroup, to leverage internal risk models used to measure credit, operational, and market risk exposures to drive regulatory capital calculations. In late 2007, the U.S. banking regulators adopted these standards for large banks, including Citigroup. As adopted, the standards require Citigroup, as a large and internationally active bank, to comply with the most advanced Basel II approaches for calculating credit and operational risk capital requirements, which could result in a need for Citigroup to hold additional regulatory capital. The U.S. implementation timetable consists of a parallel calculation period under the current regulatory capital regime (Basel I) and Basel II followed by a three-year transitional period.

        Citi began parallel reporting on April 1, 2010. There will be at least four quarters of parallel reporting before Citi enters the three-year transitional period. U.S. regulators have reserved the right to change how Basel II is applied in the U.S. following a review at the end of the second year of the transitional period, and to retain the existing prompt corrective action and leverage capital requirements applicable to banking organizations in the U.S. Citigroup intends to implement Basel II within the timeframe required by the U.S. regulators.

        Separate from the Basel II rules for credit and operational risk discussed above, the Basel Committee has proposed revisions to the market risk framework that could also lead to additional capital requirements (Basel III). Although not yet ratified by the Basel Committee or U.S. regulators, the Basel III final rules for capital, leverage and liquidity (Basel III introduces new global standards and ratios for liquidity risk measurement) are currently expected to be published by January 2011, one quarter ahead of Citigroup's earliest date for Basel II implementation for credit and operational risk.

        Financial Reform Act.    In addition to the implementation of Basel II and Basel III, the Financial Reform Act grants new regulatory authority to various U.S. federal regulators, including the Federal Reserve Board and a newly created Financial Stability Oversight Council (Oversight Council), to impose heightened prudential standards on financial institutions such as Citigroup. These standards could include heightened capital, leverage and liquidity standards, as well as requirements for periodic stress tests. The Federal Reserve Board will also have discretion to impose other prudential standards, including contingent capital requirements, and will retain important flexibility to distinguish among bank holding companies such as Citigroup based on their perceived riskiness, complexity, activities, size and other factors.

        In addition, the so-called "Collins Amendment" to the Financial Reform Act will result in new minimum capital requirements for bank holding companies such as Citigroup, and could require Citigroup to replace certain of its outstanding securities that are currently counted towards Citi's Tier 1 Capital requirements, such as trust preferred securities, over a period of time.

39


Table of Contents


FUNDING AND LIQUIDITY

General

        Citigroup's cash flows and liquidity needs are primarily generated within its operating subsidiaries. Exceptions exist for major corporate items, such as equity and certain long-term debt issuances, which take place at the Citigroup corporate level. Generally, Citi's management of funding and liquidity is designed to optimize availability of funds as needed within Citi's legal and regulatory structure. Due to various constraints that limit certain Citi subsidiaries' ability to pay dividends or otherwise make funds available (see "Parameters for Intercompany Funding Transfers" below), Citigroup's primary objectives for funding and liquidity management are established by entity and in aggregate across: (i) the parent holding company/broker dealer subsidiaries; and (ii) bank subsidiaries.

        Currently, Citigroup's primary sources of funding include deposits, long-term debt and long-term collateralized financing, and equity, including preferred, trust preferred securities and common stock. This funding is supplemented by modest amounts of short-term borrowings.

        Citi views its deposit base as its most stable and lowest cost funding source. Citi has focused on maintaining a geographically diverse retail and corporate deposit base that stood at approximately $814 billion as of June 30, 2010, as compared with $828 billion at March 31, 2010 and $836 billion at December 31, 2009. The sequential decline in deposits primarily resulted from FX translation. Excluding FX translation, Citigroup deposits at June 30, 2010 remained flat as compared with the first quarter of 2010. As stated above, Citigroup's deposits are diversified across products and regions, with approximately 63% outside of the U.S.

        At June 30, 2010, long-term debt and commercial paper outstanding for Citigroup, Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc. (CGMHI), Citigroup Funding Inc. (CFI) and other Citigroup subsidiaries, collectively, were as follows:

In billions of dollars Citigroup
Parent
Company
 Other
Non-bank
 Bank  Total
Citigroup(1)
 

Long-term debt(2)

 $189.1 $75.7 $148.5(3)$413.3 

Commercial paper

    11.2  25.2  36.4 

(1)
Includes $101.0 billion of long-term debt and $25.2 billion of commercial paper related to VIEs consolidated effective January 1, 2010 with the adoption of SFAS 166/167.

(2)
Of this amount, approximately $64.6 billion is guaranteed by the FDIC under the TGLP with $6.3 billion maturing in 2010, $20.3 billion maturing in 2011 and $38 billion maturing in 2012.

(3)
At June 30, 2010, approximately $18.6 billion relates to collateralized advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank.

        The $36.4 billion of commercial paper outstanding as of June 30, 2010 reflects the consolidation of VIEs pursuant to the adoption of SFAS 166/167 effective January 1, 2010; the $10.2 billion at December 31, 2009 was pre-adoption. The VIE consolidation led to an increase in bank subsidiary commercial paper, while non-bank subsidiarycommercial paper remained at recent levels.

        The table below details the long-term debt issuances of Citigroup during the past five quarters.

In billions of dollars 2Q09  3Q09  4Q09  1Q10  2Q10  

Debt issued under TLGP guarantee

  $17.0  $10.0  $10.0  $  $ 

Debt issued without TLGP guarantee:

                
 

Citigroup parent company/CFI

   7.4   12.6   4.0(3)  1.3   5.0(3)
 

Other Citigroup subsidiaries

   10.1(1)  7.9(2)  5.8(4)  3.7(5)  0.1 
            

Total(6)

  $34.5  $30.5  $19.8  $5.0  $5.1 
            

(1)
Includes $8.5 billion issued through the U.S. government-sponsored Department of Education Conduit Facility, and $1 billion issued by Citibank Pty. Ltd. Australia and guaranteed by the Commonwealth of Australia and other local country debt.

(2)
Includes $3.3 billion issued through the U.S. government-sponsored Department of Education Conduit Facility, and $1 billion issued by Citibank Pty. Ltd. Australia and guaranteed by the Commonwealth of Australia and other local country debt.

(3)
Includes $1.9 billion of senior debt issued under remarketing of $1.9 billion of Citigroup Capital XXIX and $1.9 billion of Citigroup Capital XXX trust preferred securities held by the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority (ADIA) to enable them to execute the forward stock purchase contract in March 2010 and June 2010, respectively.

(4)
Includes $1.4 billion issued through the U.S. government-sponsored Department of Education Conduit Facility and other local country debt.

(5)
Includes $0.5 billion issued through the U.S. government-sponsored Department of Education Conduit Facility, and $0.5 billion issued by Citibank Pty. Ltd. Australia and guaranteed by the Commonwealth of Australia and other local country debt.

(6)
The table excludes the effect of trust preferred issuances, including $27.1 billion in 3Q09 and $2.3 billion in 2Q10.

        See Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further detail on Citigroup's and its affiliates' long-term debt and commercial paper outstanding.

        Structural liquidity, defined as the sum of deposits, long-term debt and stockholders' equity as a percentage of total assets, was 71% at June 30, 2010, unchanged as compared with March 31, 2010 and compared with 67% at June 30, 2009.

        In addition, one of Citi's key structural liquidity measures is the cash capital ratio. Cash capital is a broader measure of the ability to fund the structurally illiquid portion of Citigroup's balance sheet than traditional measures, such as deposits to loans or core deposits to loans. Cash capital measures the amount of long-term funding (>1 year) available to fund illiquid assets. Long-term funding includes core customer deposits, long-term debt and equity. Illiquid assets include loans (net of liquidity adjustments), illiquid securities, securities haircuts and other assets (i.e., goodwill, intangibles, fixed assets, receivables, etc.). At June 30, 2010, the combined Citigroup, the parent holding company, and CGMHI, as well as the aggregate bank subsidiaries had an excess of cash capital. In addition, as of June 30, 2010, the combined Citigroup, the parent holding company, and CGMHI maintained liquidity to meet all maturing obligations significantly in excess of a one-year period without access to the unsecured wholesale markets.

40


Table of Contents

Aggregate Liquidity Resources

 
 Parent & Broker Dealer  Significant Bank Entities  Total  
In billions of dollars Jun. 30,
2010
 Mar. 31,
2010
 Jun. 30,
2009
 Jun. 30,
2010
 Mar. 31,
2010
 Jun. 30,
2009
 Jun. 30,
2010
 Mar. 31,
2010
 Jun. 30,
2009
 

Cash at major central banks

  $24.7  $9.5  $22.5  $86.0  $108.9  $110.0  $110.7  $118.4  $132.5 

Unencumbered Liquid Securities

   56.8   72.8   42.5   143.4   128.7   53.3   200.2   201.5   95.8 
                    

Total

  $81.5  $82.3  $65.0  $229.4  $237.6  $163.3  $310.9  $319.9  $228.3 
                    

        As noted in the table above, Citigroup's aggregate liquidity resources totaled $310.9 billion as of June 30, 2010, compared with $319.9 billion at March 31, 2010 and $228.3 billion at June 30, 2009. Excluding the impact of FX translation, the level of liquidity resources at June 30, 2010 was essentially flat to the prior quarter. These amounts are as of quarter-end, and may increase or decrease intra-quarter and intra-day in the ordinary course of business.

        As of June 30, 2010, Citigroup's and its affiliates' liquidity portfolio and broker-dealer "cash box" totaled $81.5 billion, compared with $82.3 billion at March 31, 2010 and $65.0 billion at June 30, 2009. This includes the liquidity portfolio and cash box held in the U.S. as well as government bonds held by Citigroup's broker-dealer entities in the United Kingdom and Japan. Citigroup's bank subsidiaries had an aggregate of approximately $86 billion of cash on deposit with major central banks (including the U.S. Federal Reserve Bank of New York, the European Central Bank, Bank of England, Swiss National Bank, Bank of Japan, the Monetary Authority of Singapore, and the Hong Kong Monetary Authority), compared with approximately $108.9 billion at March 31, 2010 and $110.0 billion at June 30, 2009. These amounts are in addition to cash deposited from the broker-dealer "cash box" noted above.

        Citigroup's bank subsidiaries also have significant additional liquidity resources through unencumbered highly liquid securities available for secured funding through private markets or that are, or could be, pledged to the major central banks and the U.S. Federal Home Loan Banks. The value of these liquid securities was $143.4 billion at June 30, 2010, compared with $128.7 billion at March 31, 2010 and $53.3 billion at June 30, 2009. Significant amounts of cash and liquid securities are also available in other Citigroup entities.

        In addition to the highly liquid securities listed above, Citigroup's bank subsidiaries also maintain additional unencumbered securities and loans which are currently pledged to the U.S. Federal Home Loan Banks and U.S. Federal Reserve Banks.

        Further, Citigroup, as the parent holding company, can transfer funding, subject to certain legal restrictions, to other affiliated entities, including its bank subsidiaries. Citi's non-bank subsidiaries, such as its broker-dealer subsidiaries, can also transfer excess liquidity to the parent holding company through termination of intercompany borrowings, and to the parent holding company and other affiliates, including Citi's bank subsidiaries. In addition, Citigroup's bank subsidiaries, including Citibank, N.A., can lend to Citigroup's non-bank subsidiaries in accordance with Section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act. As of June 30, 2010, the amount available for lending under Section 23A was approximately $26 billion, provided the funds are collateralized appropriately.

Funding Outlook

        Based on the current status of Citi's aggregate liquidity resources discussed above, as well as Citi's continued deleveraging, stability in its deposit base to date, and its increased structural liquidity over the prior two years, Citi currently expects to refinance only a portion of its long-term debt maturing in 2010. In addition, Citi does not currently expect to refinance its TLGP debt as it matures (as set forth in note 2 of the long-term debt above). However, as part of its efforts to maintain and solidify its structural liquidity, as well as extend the duration of liabilities supporting its businesses, for the full year of 2010, Citi currently expects to issue approximately $18 billion to $21 billion in long-term debt (excluding local country debt) an amount that is $3 billion to $6 billion higher than previously-stated estimates. This $18 billion to $21 billion of expected issuance is less than the $35 billion of expected maturities during the year (excluding local country debt). Citi continues to review its funding and liquidity needs and may adjust its expected issuances for the remainder of 2010 due to market conditions or regulatory requirements, among other factors.

41


Table of Contents

Credit Ratings

        Citigroup's ability to access the capital markets and other sources of funds, as well as the cost of these funds and its ability to maintain certain deposits, is dependent on its credit ratings. The table below indicates the current ratings for Citigroup. As a result of the Citigroup guarantee, changes in ratings for Citigroup Funding Inc. are the same as those of Citigroup.

Citigroup's Debt Ratings as of June 30, 2010

 
 Citigroup Inc.  Citigroup Funding Inc.  Citibank, N.A.
 
 Senior
debt
 Commercial
paper
 Senior
debt
 Commercial
paper
 Long-
term
 Short-
term

Fitch Ratings

 A+ F1+ A+ F1+ A+ F1+

Moody's Investors Service

 A3 P-1 A3 P-1 A1 P-1

Standard & Poor's (S&P)

 A A-1 A A-1 A+ A-1
             

        The credit rating agencies included in the chart above have each indicated that they are evaluating the impact of the Financial Reform Act on the rating support assumptions currently included in their methodologies as related to large bank holding companies. These evaluations are generally as a result of agencies' belief that the Financial Reform Act increases the uncertainty regarding the U.S. government's willingness to provide extraordinary support to such companies. Consistent with such belief and to bring Citi in line with other large banks, S&P and Moody's revised their outlooks on Citigroup's supported ratings from stable to negative in February and July of 2010, respectively. The credit rating agencies have generally indicated that their evaluations of the impact of the Financial Reform Act could take anywhere from several months to two years. The ultimate timing of the completion of the evaluations, as well as the outcomes, is uncertain.

        Ratings downgrades by Fitch Ratings, Moody's Investors Service or Standard & Poor's could have material impacts on funding and liquidity through cash obligations, reduced funding capacity and due to collateral triggers. Because of the current credit ratings of Citigroup Inc., a one-notch downgrade of its senior debt/long-term rating may or may not impact Citigroup Inc.'s commercial paper/short-term rating by one notch. As of June 30, 2010, Citi currently believes that a one-notch downgrade of both the senior debt/long-term rating of Citigroup Inc. and a one-notch downgrade of Citigroup Inc.'s commercial paper/short-term rating could result in the assumed loss of unsecured commercial paper ($10.6 billion) and tender option bonds funding ($1.9 billion) as well as derivative triggers and additional margin requirements ($1.0 billion).

        Additionally, other funding sources, such as repurchase agreements and other margin requirements for which there are no explicit triggers, could be adversely affected. The aggregate liquidity resources of Citigroup's parent holding company and broker-dealer stood at $83.6 billion as of June 30, 2010, in part as a contingency for such an event, and a broad range of mitigating actions are currently included in the Citigroup Contingency Funding Plan. These mitigating factors include, but are not limited to, accessing funding capacity from existing clients, diversifying funding sources, adjusting the size of select trading books, and tailoring levels of reverse repurchase agreement lending.

        Citi currently believes that a more severe ratings downgrade scenario, such as a two-notch downgrade of the senior debt/long-term rating of Citigroup Inc., accompanied by a one-notch downgrade of Citigroup Inc.'s commercial paper/short-term rating, could result in an additional $1.6 billion in funding requirement in the form of cash obligations and collateral.

        Further, as of June 30, 2010, a one-notch downgrade of the senior debt/long-term ratings of Citibank, N.A. could result in an approximate $3.6 billion funding requirement in the form of collateral and cash obligations. Because of the current credit ratings of Citibank, N.A., a one-notch downgrade of its senior debt/long-term rating is unlikely to have any impact on its commercial paper/short-term rating. The significant bank entities, Citibank, N.A., and other bank vehicles have aggregate liquidity resources of $229 billion, and have a detailed contingency funding plan that encompasses a broad range of mitigating actions.

42


Table of Contents


OFF-BALANCE-SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

        Citigroup and its subsidiaries are involved with several types of off-balance-sheet arrangements, including special purpose entities (SPEs), primarily in connection with securitization activities in Regional Consumer Banking and Institutional Clients Group. Citigroup and its subsidiaries use SPEs principally to obtain liquidity and favorable capital treatment by securitizing certain of Citigroup's financial assets, assisting clients in securitizing their financial assets and creating investment products for clients. The adoption of SFAS 166/167, effective on January 1, 2010, caused certain SPEs, including credit card receivables securitization trusts and asset-backed commercial paper conduits, to be consolidated in Citi's Financial Statements. For further information on Citi's securitization activities and involvement in SPEs, see Notes 1 and 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

43


Table of Contents


MANAGING GLOBAL RISK

        Citigroup's risk management framework balances strong corporate oversight with well-defined independent risk management functions for each business and region, as well as cross-business product expertise. The Citigroup risk management framework is described in Citigroup's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.


CREDIT RISK

Loan and Credit Overview

        During the second quarter of 2010, Citigroup's aggregate loan portfolio decreased by $29.6 billion to $692.2 billion. Citi's total allowance for loan losses totaled $46.2 billion at June 30, 2010, a coverage ratio of 6.72% of total loans, down from 6.80% at March 31, 2010 and up from 5.60% in the second quarter of 2009.

        During the second quarter of 2010, Citigroup recorded a net release of $1.5 billion to its credit reserves and allowance for unfunded lending commitments, compared to a $3.9 billion build in the second quarter of 2009. The release consisted of a net release of $683 million for corporate loans ($253 million release in ICG and approximately $400 million release in SAP), and a net release of $827 million for consumer loans, mainly for Retail Partner Cards in Citi Holdings, LATAM RCB and Asia RCB (mainly a $412 million release in RCB and a $421 million release in LCL). Despite the reserve release for consumer loans, the coincident months of coverage of the consumer portfolio increased from 15.5 to 15.9 months, significantly higher than the year-ago level of 12.7 months.

        Net credit losses of $8.0 billion during the second quarter of 2010 decreased $3.5 billion from year-ago levels (on a managed basis). The decrease consisted of a net decrease of $2.2 billion for consumer loans (mainly a $1.9 billion decrease in LCL and a $321 million decrease in RCB) and a decrease of $1.3 billion for corporate loans ($1.2 billion decrease in SAP and a $126 million decrease in ICG).

        Consumer non-accrual loans (which excludes credit card receivables) totaled $13.8 billion at June 30, 2010, compared to $15.6 billion at March 31, 2010 and $15.8 billion at June 30, 2009. The consumer loan 90 days or more delinquency rate was 3.67% at June 30, 2010, compared to 4.01% at March 31, 2010 and 3.68% a year ago. The 30 to 89 days past due consumer loan delinquency rate was 3.06% at June 30, 2010, compared to 3.19% at March 31, 2010 and 3.41% a year ago. During the second quarter of 2010, both early- and later-stage delinquencies declined across most of the consumer loan portfolios, driven by improvement in North America mortgages. Delinquencies declined in first mortgages, entirely as a result of asset sales and loans moving from the trial period under the U.S. Treasury's Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) to permanent modification.

        Corporate non-accrual loans were $11.0 billion at June 30, 2010, compared to $12.9 billion at March 31, 2010 and $12.5 billion a year ago. The decrease from the prior quarter was mainly due to loan sales, write-offs and paydowns, which were partially offset by increases due to weakening of certain borrowers.

        See below for a discussion of Citi's loan and credit accounting policies.

44


Table of Contents


Loans Outstanding

In millions of dollars at year end 2nd Qtr.
2010
 1st Qtr.
2010
 4th Qtr.
2009
 3rd Qtr.
2009
 2nd Qtr.
2009
 

Consumer loans

                

In U.S. offices

                
 

Mortgage and real estate(1)

  $171,102  $180,334  $183,842  $191,748  $197,358 
 

Installment, revolving credit, and other

   61,867   69,111   58,099   57,820   61,645 
 

Cards

   125,337   127,818   28,951   36,039   33,750 
 

Commercial and industrial

   5,540   5,386   5,640   5,848   6,016 
 

Lease financing

   6   7   11   15   16 
            

  $363,852  $382,656  $276,543  $291,470  $298,785 
            

In offices outside the U.S.

                
 

Mortgage and real estate (1)

  $47,921  $49,421  $47,297  $47,568  $45,986 
 

Installment, revolving credit, and other

   38,115   44,541   42,805   45,004   45,556 
 

Cards

   37,510   38,191   41,493   41,443   42,262 
 

Commercial and industrial

   16,420   14,828   14,780   14,858   13,858 
 

Lease financing

   677   771   331   345   339 
            

  $140,643  $147,752  $146,706  $149,218  $148,001 
            

Total consumer loans

  $504,495  $530,408  $423,249  $440,688  $446,786 

Unearned income

   951   1,061   808   803   866 
            

Consumer loans, net of unearned income

  $505,446  $531,469  $424,057  $441,491  $447,652 
            

Corporate loans

                

In U.S. offices

                
 

Commercial and industrial

  $11,656  $15,558  $15,614  $19,692  $26,125 
 

Loans to financial institutions

   31,450   31,279   6,947   7,666   8,181 
 

Mortgage and real estate (1)

   22,453   21,283   22,560   23,221   23,862 
 

Installment, revolving credit, and other

   14,812   15,792   17,737   17,734   19,856 
 

Lease financing

   1,244   1,239   1,297   1,275   1,284 
            

  $81,615  $85,151  $64,155  $69,588  $79,308 
            

In offices outside the U.S.

                
 

Commercial and industrial

  $65,615  $64,903  $68,467  $73,564  $78,512 
 

Installment, revolving credit, and other

   11,174   10,956   9,683   10,949   11,638 
 

Mortgage and real estate (1)

   7,301   9,771   9,779   12,023   11,887 
 

Loans to financial institutions

   20,646   19,003   15,113   16,906   15,856 
 

Lease financing

   582   663   1,295   1,462   1,560 
 

Governments and official institutions

   1,046   1,324   1,229   826   713 
            

  $106,364  $106,620  $105,566  $115,730  $120,166 
            

Total corporate loans

  $187,979  $191,771  $169,721  $185,318  $199,474 

Unearned income

   (1,259)  (1,436)  (2,274)  (4,598)  (5,436)
            

Corporate loans, net of unearned income

  $186,720  $190,335  $167,447  $180,720  $194,038 
            

Total loans—net of unearned income

  $692,166  $721,804  $591,504  $622,211  $641,690 

Allowance for loan losses—on drawn exposures

   (46,197)  (48,746)  (36,033)  (36,416)  (35,940)
            

Total loans—net of unearned income and allowance for credit losses

  $645,969  $673,058  $555,471  $585,795  $605,750 

Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans—net of unearned income(2)

   6.72%  6.80%  6.09%  5.85%  5.60%
            

Allowance for consumer loan losses as a percentage of total consumer loans—net of unearned income(2)

   7.87%  7.84%  6.70%  6.44%  6.25%
            

Allowance for corporate loan losses as a percentage of total corporate loans—net of unearned income(2)

   3.59%  3.90%  4.56%  4.42%  4.11%
            

(1)
Loans secured primarily by real estate.

(2)
The first and second quarters of 2010 exclude loans which are carried at fair value.

        Certain lending products included in the loan table above have terms that may give rise to additional credit issues. Credit cards with below-market introductory interest rates, multiple loans supported by the same collateral (e.g., home equity loans), and interest-only loans are examples of such products. However, Citi does not believe these products are material to its financial position and results and are closely managed via credit controls that mitigate the additional inherent risk.

Impaired Loans

        Impaired loans are those where Citigroup believes it is probable that it will not collect all amounts due according to the original contractual terms of the loan. Impaired loans include corporate non-accrual loans as well as smaller-balance homogeneous loans whose terms have been modified due to the borrower's financial difficulties and Citigroup granted a concession to the borrower. Such modifications may include interest rate reductions and/or principal forgiveness. Valuation allowances for impaired loans are estimated considering all available evidence including, as appropriate, the present value

45


Table of Contents

of the expected future cash flows discounted at the loan's original contractual effective rate, the secondary market value of the loan and the fair value of collateral less disposal costs. Consumer impaired loans exclude smaller-balance homogeneous loans that have not been modified and are carried on a non-accrual basis, as well as substantially all loans modified for periods of 12 months or less. As of June 30, 2010, loans included in those short-term programs amounted to $7 billion.

        The following table presents information about impaired loans:

In millions of dollars at year end June 30,
2010
 December 31,
2009
 

Non-accrual corporate loans

       
 

Commercial and industrial

  $6,565  $6,347 
 

Loans to financial institutions

   478   1,794 
 

Mortgage and real estate

   2,568   4,051 
 

Lease financing

   58   
 

Other

   1,367   1,287 
      
 

Total non-accrual corporate loans

  $11,036  $13,479 
      

Impaired consumer loans(1)

       
 

Mortgage and real estate

  $16,094  $10,629 
 

Installment and other

   4,440   3,853 
 

Cards

   5,028   2,453 
      
 

Total impaired consumer loans

  $25,562  $16,935 
      

Total(2)

  $36,598  $30,414 
      

Non-accrual corporate loans with valuation allowances

  $7,035  $8,578 

Impaired consumer loans with valuation allowances

   25,143   16,453 
      

Non-accrual corporate valuation allowance

  $2,355  $2,480 

Impaired consumer valuation allowance

   7,540   4,977 
      

Total valuation allowances (3)

  $9,895  $7,457 
      

(1)
Prior to 2008, Citi's financial accounting systems did not separately track impaired smaller-balance, homogeneous consumer loans whose terms were modified due to the borrowers' financial difficulties and it was determined that a concession was granted to the borrower. Smaller-balance consumer loans modified since January 1, 2008 amounted to $24.7 billion and $15.9 billion at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. However, information derived from Citi's risk management systems indicates that the amounts of outstanding modified loans, including those modified prior to 2008, approximated $26.6 billion and $18.1 billion at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.

(2)
Excludes loans purchased for investment purposes.

(3)
Included in the Allowance for loan losses.

Loan Accounting Policies

        The following are Citigroup's accounting policies for loans, allowance for loan losses and related lending activities.

Loans

        Loans are reported at their outstanding principal balances net of any unearned income and unamortized deferred fees and costs except that credit card receivable balances also include accrued interest and fees. Loan origination fees and certain direct origination costs are generally deferred and recognized as adjustments to income over the lives of the related loans.

        As described in Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, Citi has elected fair value accounting for certain loans. Such loans are carried at fair value with changes in fair value reported in earnings. Interest income on such loans is recorded in Interest revenue at the contractually specified rate.

        Loans for which the fair value option has not been elected are classified upon origination or acquisition as either held-for-investment or held-for-sale. This classification is based on management's initial intent and ability with regard to those loans.

        Loans that are held-for-investment are classified as Loans, net of unearned income on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, and the related cash flows are included within the cash flows from investing activities category in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows on the line Change in loans. However, when the initial intent for holding a loan has changed from held-for-investment to held-for-sale, the loan is reclassified to held-for-sale, but the related cash flows continue to be reported in cash flows from investing activities in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows on the line Proceeds from sales and securitizations of loans.

        Substantially all of the consumer loans sold or securitized by Citigroup are U.S. prime residential mortgage loans or U.S. credit card receivables. The practice of the U.S. prime mortgage business has been to sell all of its loans except for non-conforming adjustable rate loans. U.S. prime mortgage conforming loans are classified as held-for-sale at the time of origination. The related cash flows are classified in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows in the cash flows from operating activities category on the line Change in loans held-for-sale.

        Prior to the adoption of SFAS 166/167 in 2010, U.S. credit card receivables were classified at origination as loans-held-for-sale to the extent that management did not have the intent to hold the receivables for the foreseeable future or until maturity. Prior to 2010, the U.S. credit card securitization forecast for the three months following the latest balance sheet date, excluding replenishments, was the basis for the amount of such loans classified as held-for-sale. Cash flows related to U.S. credit card loans classified as held-for-sale at origination or acquisition are reported in the cash flows from operating activities category on the line Change in loans held-for-sale.

46


Table of Contents

Consumer loans

        Consumer loans represent loans and leases managed primarily by the Regional Consumer Banking and Local Consumer Lending businesses. As a general rule, interest accrual ceases for installment and real estate (both open- and closed-end) loans when payments are 90 days contractually past due. For credit cards and unsecured revolving loans, however, Citi generally accrues interest until payments are 180 days past due. Loans that have been modified to grant a short-term or long-term concession to a borrower who is in financial difficulty may not be accruing interest at the time of the modification. The policy for returning such modified loans to accrual status varies by product and/or region. In most cases, a minimum number of payments (ranging from one to six) are required, while in other cases the loan is never returned to accrual status.

        Citi's charge-off policies follow the general guidelines below:

    Unsecured installment loans are charged off at 120 days past due.

    Unsecured revolving loans and credit card loans are charged off at 180 days contractually past due.

    Loans secured with non-real estate collateral are written down to the estimated value of the collateral, less costs to sell, at 120 days past due.

    Real estate-secured loans are written down to the estimated value of the property, less costs to sell, at 180 days contractually past due.

    Non-bank loans secured by real estate are written down to the estimated value of the property, less costs to sell, at the earlier of the receipt of title or 12 months in foreclosure (a process that must commence when payments are 120 days contractually past due).

    Non-bank auto loans are written down to the estimated value of the collateral, less costs to sell, at repossession or, if repossession is not pursued, no later than 180 days contractually past due.

    Non-bank unsecured personal loans are charged off when the loan is 180 days contractually past due if there have been no payments within the last six months, but in no event can these loans exceed 360 days contractually past due.

    Unsecured loans in bankruptcy are charged off within 60 days of notification of filing by the bankruptcy court or within the contractual write-off periods, whichever occurs earlier.

    Real estate-secured loans in bankruptcy are written down to the estimated value of the property, less costs to sell, at the later of 60 days after notification or 60 days contractually past due.

    Non-bank unsecured personal loans in bankruptcy are charged off when they are 30 days contractually past due.

Corporate loans

        Corporate loans represent loans and leases managed by ICG or the Special Asset Pool. Corporate loans are identified as impaired and placed on a cash (non-accrual) basis when it is determined, based on actual experience and a forward-looking assessment of the collectability of the loan in full, that the payment of interest or principal is doubtful or when interest or principal is 90 days past due, except when the loan is well-collateralized and in the process of collection. Any interest accrued on impaired corporate loans and leases is reversed at 90 days and charged against current earnings, and interest is thereafter included in earnings only to the extent actually received in cash. When there is doubt regarding the ultimate collectability of principal, all cash receipts are thereafter applied to reduce the recorded investment in the loan.

        Impaired corporate loans and leases are written down to the extent that principal is judged to be uncollectible. Impaired collateral-dependent loans and leases, where repayment is expected to be provided solely by the sale of the underlying collateral and there are no other available and reliable sources of repayment, are written down to the lower of cost or collateral value. Cash-basis loans are returned to an accrual status when all contractual principal and interest amounts are reasonably assured of repayment and there is a sustained period of repayment performance in accordance with the contractual terms.

Loans Held-for-Sale

        Corporate and consumer loans that have been identified for sale are classified as loans held-for-sale included in Other assets. With the exception of certain mortgage loans for which the fair value option has been elected, these loans are accounted for at the lower of cost or market value (LOCOM), with any write-downs or subsequent recoveries charged to Other revenue.

Allowance for Loan Losses

        Allowance for loan losses represents management's best estimate of probable losses inherent in the portfolio, as well as probable losses related to large individually evaluated impaired loans and troubled debt restructurings. Attribution of the allowance is made for analytical purposes only, and the entire allowance is available to absorb probable loan losses inherent in the overall portfolio. Additions to the allowance are made through the provision for loan losses. Loan losses are deducted from the allowance, and subsequent recoveries are added. Securities received in exchange for loan claims in debt restructurings are initially recorded at fair value, with any gain or loss reflected as a recovery or charge-off to the allowance, and are subsequently accounted for as securities available-for-sale.

47


Table of Contents

Corporate loans

        In the corporate portfolios, the allowance for loan losses includes an asset-specific component and a statistically-based component. The asset-specific component is calculated under ASC 310-10-35, Receivables—Subsequent Measurement (formerly SFAS 114) on an individual basis for larger-balance, non-homogeneous loans, which are considered impaired. An asset-specific allowance is established when the discounted cash flows, collateral value (less disposal costs), or observable market price of the impaired loan is lower than its carrying value. This allowance considers the borrower's overall financial condition, resources, and payment record, the prospects for support from any financially responsible guarantors (discussed further below) and, if appropriate, the realizable value of any collateral. The asset-specific component of the allowance for smaller balance impaired loans is calculated on a pool basis considering historical loss experience. The allowance for the remainder of the loan portfolio is calculated under ASC 450, Contingencies (formerly SFAS 5) using a statistical methodology, supplemented by management judgment. The statistical analysis considers the portfolio's size, remaining tenor, and credit quality as measured by internal risk ratings assigned to individual credit facilities, which reflect probability of default and loss given default. The statistical analysis considers historical default rates and historical loss severity in the event of default, including historical average levels and historical variability. The result is an estimated range for inherent losses. The best estimate within the range is then determined by management's quantitative and qualitative assessment of current conditions, including general economic conditions, specific industry and geographic trends, and internal factors including portfolio concentrations, trends in internal credit quality indicators, and current and past underwriting standards.

        For both the asset-specific and the statistically-based components of the allowance for loan losses, management may incorporate guarantor support. The financial wherewithal of the guarantor is evaluated, as applicable, based on net worth, cash flow statements and personal or company financial statements which are updated and reviewed at least annually. Typically, a guarantee arrangement is used to facilitate cooperation in a restructuring situation. A guarantor's reputation and willingness to work with Citigroup is evaluated based on the historical experience with the guarantor and the knowledge of the marketplace. In the rare event that the guarantor is unwilling or unable to perform or facilitate borrower cooperation, Citi pursues a legal remedy. If Citi does not pursue a legal remedy, it is because Citi does not believe the guarantor has the financial wherewithal to perform regardless of legal action, or because there are legal limitations on simultaneously pursuing guarantors and foreclosure. A guarantor's reputation does not typically impact our decision or ability to seek performance under guarantee.

        In cases where a guarantee is a factor in the assessment of loan losses, it is typically included via adjustment to the loan's internal risk rating, which in turn is the basis for the adjustment to the statistically-based component of the allowance for loan losses. To date, it is only in rare circumstances that an impaired commercial or CRE loan is carried at a value in excess of the appraised value due to a guarantee.

        When Citi's monitoring of the loan indicates that the guarantor's wherewithal to pay is uncertain or has deteriorated, there is either no change in the risk rating, because the guarantor's credit support was never initially factored in, or the risk rating is adjusted to reflect that uncertainty or deterioration. Accordingly, a guarantor's ultimate failure to perform or a lack of legal enforcement of the guarantee does not materially impact the allowance for loan losses, as there is typically no further significant adjustment of the loan's risk rating at that time.

Consumer loans

        For Consumer loans, each portfolio of smaller-balance, homogeneous loans—including consumer mortgage, installment, revolving credit, and most other consumer loans—is independently evaluated for impairment. The allowance for loan losses attributed to these loans is established via a process that estimates the probable losses inherent in the specific portfolio based upon various analyses. These include migration analysis, in which historical delinquency and credit loss experience is applied to the current aging of the portfolio, together with analyses that reflect current trends and conditions.

        Management also considers overall portfolio indicators, including historical credit losses, delinquent, non-performing, and classified loans, trends in volumes and terms of loans, an evaluation of overall credit quality, the credit process, including lending policies and procedures, and economic, geographical, product and other environmental factors. In addition, valuation allowances are determined for impaired smaller-balance homogeneous loans whose terms have been modified due to the borrowers' financial difficulties and where it has been determined that a concession was granted to the borrower. Such modifications may include interest rate reductions, principal forgiveness and/or term extensions. Where long-term concessions have been granted, such modifications are accounted for as troubled debt restructurings (TDRs). The allowance for loan losses for TDRs is determined in accordance with ASC-310-10-35 by comparing expected cash flows of the loans discounted at the loans' original effective interest rates to the carrying value of the loans. Where short-term concessions have been granted, the allowance for loan losses is materially consistent with the requirements of ASC-310-10-35.

        Loans included in the U.S. Treasury's Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) trial period are not classified as modified under short-term or long-term programs, and the allowance for loan losses for these loans is calculated under ASC 450-20. The allowance calculation for HAMP trial loans uses default rates that assume that the borrower will not successfully complete the trial period and receive a permanent modification. As of June 30, 2010, of the loans in which the trial period has ended, 37% of the loan balances were successfully modified under HAMP, 12% were modified under the Citi Supplemental program, 6% received HAMP Re-age, (each as described under Consumer Loan Modification Programs) and 45% did not receive any modification from Citi to date.

48


Table of Contents

Reserve Estimates and Policies

        Management provides reserves for an estimate of probable losses inherent in the funded loan portfolio on the balance sheet in the form of an allowance for loan losses. These reserves are established in accordance with Citigroup's Credit Reserve Policies, as approved by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. Citi's Chief Risk Officer and Chief Financial Officer review the adequacy of the credit loss reserves each quarter with representatives from the Risk Management and Finance staffs for each applicable business area.

        The above-mentioned representatives covering the business areas having classifiably managed portfolios, where internal credit-risk ratings are assigned (primarily ICG, Regional Consumer Banking andLocal Consumer Lending), or modified consumer loans, where concessions were granted due to the borrowers' financial difficulties present recommended reserve balances for their funded and unfunded lending portfolios along with supporting quantitative and qualitative data. The quantitative data include:

    Estimated probable losses for non-performing, non-homogeneous exposures within a business line's classifiably managed portfolio and impaired smaller-balance homogeneous loans whose terms have been modified due to the borrowers' financial difficulties, and it was determined that a concession was granted to the borrower. Consideration may be given to the following, as appropriate, when determining this estimate: (i) the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan's original effective rate; (ii) the borrower's overall financial condition, resources and payment record; and (iii) the prospects for support from financially responsible guarantors or the realizable value of any collateral. When impairment is measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows, the entire change in present value is recorded in the Provision for loan losses.

    Statistically calculated losses inherent in the classifiably managed portfolio for performing and de minimis non-performing exposures. The calculation is based upon: (i) Citigroup's internal system of credit-risk ratings, which are analogous to the risk ratings of the major rating agencies; and (ii) historical default and loss data, including rating-agency information regarding default rates from 1983 to 2009, and internal data dating to the early 1970s on severity of losses in the event of default.

    Additional adjustments include:  (i) statistically calculated estimates to cover the historical fluctuation of the default rates over the credit cycle, the historical variability of loss severity among defaulted loans, and the degree to which there are large obligor concentrations in the global portfolio; and (ii) adjustments made for specifically known items, such as current environmental factors and credit trends.

        In addition, representatives from both the Risk Management and Finance staffs that cover business areas that have delinquency-managed portfolios containing smaller homogeneous loans present their recommended reserve balances based upon leading credit indicators, including loan delinquencies and changes in portfolio size as well as economic trends including housing prices, unemployment and GDP. This methodology is applied separately for each individual product within each different geographic region in which these portfolios exist.

        This evaluation process is subject to numerous estimates and judgments. The frequency of default, risk ratings, loss recovery rates, the size and diversity of individual large credits, and the ability of borrowers with foreign currency obligations to obtain the foreign currency necessary for orderly debt servicing, among other things, are all taken into account during this review. Changes in these estimates could have a direct impact on the credit costs in any quarter and could result in a change in the allowance. Changes to the reserve flow through the Consolidated Statement of Income on the line Provision for loan losses.

Allowance for Unfunded Lending Commitments

        A similar approach to the allowance for loan losses is used for calculating a reserve for the expected losses related to unfunded loan commitments and standby letters of credit. This reserve is classified on the balance sheet in Other liabilities. Changes to the allowance for unfunded lending commitments flow through the Consolidated Statement of Income on the line Provision for unfunded lending commitments.

49


Table of Contents


Details of Credit Loss Experience

In millions of dollars 2nd Qtr.
2010
 1st Qtr.
2010
 4th Qtr.
2009
 3rd Qtr.
2009
 2nd Qtr.
2009
 

Allowance for loan losses at beginning of period

  $48,746  $36,033  $36,416  $35,940  $31,703 
            

Provision for loan losses

                
  

Consumer

  $6,672  $8,244  $7,077  $7,321  $10,010 
  

Corporate

   (149)  122   764   1,450   2,223 
            

  $6,523  $8,366  $7,841  $8,771  $12,233 
            

Gross credit losses

                

Consumer

                
 

In U.S. offices

  $6,494  $6,942  $4,360  $4,459  $4,694 
 

In offices outside the U.S. 

   1,774   1,797   2,187   2,406   2,305 

Corporate

                
 

In U.S. offices

   563   404   478   1,101   1,216 
 

In offices outside the U.S. 

   290   155   877   483   558 
            

  $9,121  $9,298  $7,902  $8,449  $8,773 
            

Credit recoveries

                

Consumer

                
 

In U.S. offices

  $460  $419  $160  $149  $131 
 

In offices outside the U.S. 

   318   300   327   288   261 

Corporate

                
 

In U.S. offices

   307   177   246   30   4 
 

In offices outside the U.S. 

   74   18   34   13   22 
            

  $1,159  $914  $767  $480  $418 
            

Net credit losses

                
 

In U.S. offices

  $6,290  $6,750  $4,432  $5,381  $5,775 
 

In offices outside the U.S. 

   1,672   1,634   2,703   2,588   2,580 
            

Total

  $7,962  $8,384  $7,135  $7,969  $8,355 
            

Other—net(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)

  $(1,110) $12,731  $(1,089) $(326) $359 
            

Allowance for loan losses at end of period(6)

  $46,197  $48,746  $36,033  $36,416  $35,940 
            

Allowance for loan losses as a % of total loans

   6.72%  6.80%  6.09%  5.85%  5.60%

Allowance for unfunded lending commitments(7)

  $1,054  $1,122  $1,157  $1,074  $1,082 
            

Total allowance for loan losses and unfunded lending commitments

  $47,251  $49,868  $37,190  $37,490  $37,022 
            

Net consumer credit losses

  $7,490  $8,020  $6,060  $6,428  $6,607 

As a percentage of average consumer loans

   5.75%  6.04%  5.43%  5.66%  5.88%
            

Net corporate credit losses

  $472  $364  $1,075  $1,541  $1,748 

As a percentage of average corporate loans

   0.25%  0.19%  0.61%  0.82%  0.89%
            

Allowance for loan losses at end of period(8)

                
 

Citicorp

  $17,524  $18,503  $10,731  $10,956  $10,676 
 

Citi Holdings

   28,673   30,243   25,302   25,460   25,264 
            
   

Total Citigroup

  $46,197  $48,746  $36,033  $36,416  $35,940 
            

Allowance by type

                
 

Consumer(9)

  $39,578  $41,422  $28,397  $28,420  $27,969 
 

Corporate

   6,619   7,324   7,636   7,996   7,971 
            
   

Total Citigroup

  $46,197  $48,746  $36,033  $36,416  $35,940 
            

(1)
The second quarter of 2010 includes a reduction of approximately $230 million related to the transfers to held-for-sale of the Canada Cards portfolio and an Auto portfolio. Additionally, the 2010 second quarter includes a reduction of approximately $480 million related to the sale or transfers to held-for-sale of U.S. real estate lending loans.

(2)
The first quarter of 2010 primarily includes $13.4 billion related to the impact of consolidating entities in connection with Citi's adoption of SFAS 166/167 (see discussion on page 3 and in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements) and reductions of approximately $640 million related to the sale or transfer to held-for-sale of U.S. and U.K. real estate lending loans.

(3)
The fourth quarter of 2009 includes a reduction of approximately $335 million related to securitizations and approximately $400 million related to the sale or transfer to held-for-sale of U.S. real estate lending loans.

(4)
The third quarter of 2009 primarily includes a reduction to the credit loss reserves of $562 million related to the transfer of the U.K. Cards portfolio to held-for-sale, partially offset by increases related to FX translation.

(5)
The second quarter of 2009 primarily includes increases to the credit loss reserves, primarily related to FX translation.

(6)
Included in the allowance for loan losses are reserves for loans which have been subject to troubled debt restructurings (TDRs) of $7,320 million, $6,926 million, $4,819 million, $4,587 million and $3,810 million as of June 30, 2010, March 31, 2010, December 31, 2009, September 30, 2009 and June 30, 2009, respectively.

(7)
Represents additional credit loss reserves for unfunded corporate lending commitments and letters of credit recorded in Other Liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

(8)
Allowance for loan losses represents management's best estimate of probable losses inherent in the portfolio, as well as probable losses related to large individually evaluated impaired loans and TDRs. Attribution of the allowance is made for analytical purposes only, and the entire allowance is available to absorb probable credit losses inherent in the overall portfolio.

(9)
Included in the second quarter of 2010 consumer loan loss reserve is $20.6 billion related to Citi's global credit card portfolio. See discussion on page 3 and in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

50


Table of Contents


Non-Accrual Assets

        The table below summarizes Citigroup's view of non-accrual loans as of the periods indicated. Non-accrual loans are loans in which the borrower has fallen behind in interest payments or, for corporate loans, where Citi has determined that the payment of interest or principal is doubtful, and which are therefore considered impaired. As discussed under "Loan Accounting Policies" above, in situations where Citi reasonably expects that only a portion of the principal and interest owed will ultimately be collected, all payments received are reflected as a reduction of principal and not as interest income. There is no industry-wide definition of non-accrual assets, however, and as such, analysis across the industry is not always comparable.

        Corporate non-accrual loans may still be current on interest payments. Consistent with industry conventions, Citi generally accrues interest on credit card loans until such loans are charged-off, which typically occurs at 180 days' contractual delinquency. As such, the non-accrual loan disclosures in this section do not include credit card loans.

Non-accrual loans

In millions of dollars 2nd Qtr.
2010
 1st Qtr.
2010
 4th Qtr.
2009
 3rd Qtr.
2009
 2nd Qtr.
2009
 

Citicorp

  $4,510  $5,024  $5,353  $5,507  $5,395 

Citi Holdings

   20,302   23,544   26,387   27,177   22,851 
            
 

Total non-accrual loans (NAL)

  $24,812  $28,568  $31,740  $32,684  $28,246 
            

Corporate NAL(1)

                

North America

  $4,411  $5,660  $5,621  $5,263  $3,499 

EMEA

   5,508   5,834   6,308   7,969   7,690 

Latin America

   570   608   569   416   230 

Asia

   547   830   981   1,061   1,056 
            

  $11,036  $12,932  $13,479  $14,709  $12,475 
            
 

Citicorp

  $2,573  $2,975  $3,238  $3,300  $3,159 
 

Citi Holdings

   8,463   9,957   10,241   11,409   9,316 
            

  $11,036  $12,932  $13,479  $14,709  $12,475 
            

Consumer NAL(1)

                

North America

  $11,289  $12,966  $15,111  $14,609  $12,154 

EMEA

   690   790   1,159   1,314   1,356 

Latin America

   1,218   1,246   1,340   1,342   1,520 

Asia

   579   634   651   710   741 
            

  $13,776  $15,636  $18,261  $17,975  $15,771 
            
 

Citicorp

  $1,937  $2,049  $2,115  $2,207  $2,236 
 

Citi Holdings

   11,839   13,587   16,146   15,768   13,535 
            

  $13,776  $15,636  $18,261  $17,975  $15,771 
            

(1)
Excludes purchased distressed loans as they are generally accreting interest until write-off. The carrying value of these loans was $672 million at June 30, 2010, $804 million at March 31, 2010, $920 million at December 31, 2009, $1.267 billion at September 30, 2009 and $1.509 billion at June 30, 2009.

51


Table of Contents

Non-Accrual Assets (continued)

        The table below summarizes Citigroup's other real estate owned (OREO) assets. This represents the carrying value of all property acquired by foreclosure or other legal proceedings when Citi has taken possession of the collateral.

OREO  2nd Qtr.
2010
 1st Qtr.
2010
 4th Qtr.
2009
 3rd Qtr.
2009
 2nd Qtr.
2009
 

Citicorp

  $870  $881  $874  $284  $291 

Citi Holdings

   790   632   615   585   664 

Corporate/Other

   13   8   11   15   14 
            
 

Total OREO

  $1,673  $1,521  $1,500  $884  $969 
            

North America

  $1,428  $1,291  $1,294  $682  $789 

EMEA

   146   134   121   105   97 

Latin America

   43   51   45   40   29 

Asia

   56   45   40   57   54 
            

  $1,673  $1,521  $1,500  $884  $969 
            

Other repossessed assets(1)

  $55  $64  $73  $76  $72 
            

(1)
Primarily transportation equipment, carried at lower of cost or fair value, less costs to sell.

Non-accrual assets (NAA)—Total Citigroup  2nd Qtr.
2010
 1st Qtr.
2010
 4th Qtr.
2009
 3rd Qtr.
2009
 2nd Qtr.
2009
 

Corporate NAL

  $11,036  $12,932  $13,479  $14,709  $12,475 

Consumer NAL

   13,776   15,636   18,261   17,975   15,771 
            
 

NAL

  $24,812  $28,568  $31,740  $32,684  $28,246 
            

OREO

  $1,673  $1,521  $1,500  $884  $969 

Other repossessed assets

   55   64   73   76   72 
            
 

NAA

  $26,540  $30,153  $33,313  $33,644  $29,287 
            

NAL as a percentage of total loans

   3.58%  3.96%  5.37%  5.25%  4.40%

NAA as a percentage of total assets

   1.37%  1.51%  1.79%  1.78%  1.58%

Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of NAL(1)

   186%  171%  114%  111%  127%
            

 

NAA—Total Citicorp  2nd Qtr.
2010
 1st Qtr.
2010
 4th Qtr.
2009
 3rd Qtr.
2009
 2nd Qtr.
2009
 

NAL

  $4,510  $5,024  $5,353  $5,507  $5,395 

OREO

   870   881   874   284   291 

Other repossessed assets

   N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A 
            
 

Non-accrual assets (NAA)

  $5,380  $5,905  $6,227  $5,791  $5,686 
            

NAA as a percentage of total assets

   0.44%  0.48%  0.55%  0.54%  0.54%

Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of NAL(1)

   389%  368%  200%  199%  198%
            

NAA—Total Citi Holdings

                

NAL

  $20,302  $23,544  $26,387  $27,177  $22,851 

OREO

   790   632   615   585   664 

Other repossessed assets

   N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A 
            
 

NAA

  $21,092  $24,176  $27,002  $27,762  $23,515 
            

NAA as a percentage of total assets

   4.54%  4.81%  5.54%  4.99%  4.04%

Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of NAL(1)

   141%  128%  96%  94%  111%
            

(1)
The allowance for loan losses includes the allowance for credit card ($20.6 billion at June 30, 2010) and purchased distressed loans, while the non-accrual loans exclude credit card balances and purchased distressed loans, as these generally continue to accrue interest until write-off.

N/A    Not available at the Citicorp or Citi Holdings level.

52


Table of Contents

Renegotiated Loans

        The following table presents loans which were modified in a troubled debt restructuring.

In millions of dollars June 30,
2010
 December 31,
2009
 

Corporate renegotiated loans(1)

       

In U.S. offices

       
 

Commercial and industrial

  $254  $203 
 

Mortgage and real estate

   169   
 

Other

   143   
      

  $566  $203 
      

In offices outside the U.S.

       
 

Commercial and industrial

  $192  $145 
 

Mortgage and real estate

   7   2 
 

Other

     
      

  $199  $147 
      

Total corporate renegotiated loans

  $765  $350 
      

Consumer renegotiated loans(2)(3)(4)(5)

       

In U.S. offices

       
 

Mortgage and real estate

  $16,582  $11,165 
 

Cards

   4,044   992 
 

Installment and other

   2,180   2,689 
      

  $22,806  $14,846 
      

In offices outside the U.S.

       
 

Mortgage and real estate

  $734  $415 
 

Cards

   985   1,461 
 

Installment and other

   2,189   1,401 
      

   3,908   3,277 
      

Total consumer renegotiated loans

  $26,714  $18,123 
      

(1)
Includes $476 million and $317 million of non-accrual loans included in the non-accrual assets table above, at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.

(2)
Includes $2,257 million and $2,000 million of non-accrual loans included in the non-accrual assets table above, at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.

(3)
Includes $27 million of commercial real estate loans at June 30, 2010.

(4)
Includes $92 million and $16 million of commercial loans at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.

(5)
Smaller balance homogeneous loans were derived from Citi's risk management systems.

Representations and Warranties

        When selling a loan, Citi makes various representations and warranties relating to, among other things, the following:

    Citi's ownership of the loan;

    the validity of the lien securing the loan;

    the absence of delinquent taxes or liens against the property securing the loan;

    the effectiveness of title insurance on the property securing the loan;

    the process used in selecting the loans for inclusion in a transaction;

    the loan's compliance with any applicable loan criteria established by the buyer; and

    the loan's compliance with applicable local, state and federal laws.

        The specific representations and warranties made by Citi depend on the nature of the transaction and the requirements of the buyer. Market conditions and credit-rating agency requirements may also affect representations and warranties and the other provisions Citi may agree to in loan sales.

        Citi's representations and warranties are generally not subject to stated limits in amount or time of coverage. However, contractual liability arises only when the representations and warranties are breached and generally only when a loss results from the breach. In the event of a breach of these representations and warranties, Citi may be required to either repurchase the mortgage loans (generally at unpaid principal balance plus accrued interest), with the identified defects, or indemnify ("make whole") the investors for their losses.

        For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, almost half of Citi's repurchases and make-whole payments were attributable to misrepresentation of facts by either the borrower or a third party (e.g., income, employment, debts, FICO, etc.), up from approximately a quarter for the respective periods in 2009. In addition, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, approximately 20% of Citi's repurchases and make-whole payments related to appraisal issues (e.g., an error or misrepresentation of value), up from approximately 9% for the respective 2009 periods. The third largest category of repurchases and make-whole payments in 2010, to date, related to program requirements (e.g., a loan that does not meet investor guidelines such as contractual interest rate), which was the second largest category in the first half of 2009. There is not a meaningful difference in incurred or estimated loss for each type of defect.

        In the case of a repurchase, Citi will bear any subsequent credit loss on the mortgage loan and the loan is typically considered a credit-impaired loan and accounted for under SOP 03-3, "Accounting for Certain Loans and Debt Securities, Acquired in a Transfer" (now incorporated into ASC 310-30, Receivables—Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality). To date, these repurchases have not had a material impact on Citi's non-performing loan statistics because credit-impaired purchased SOP 03-3 loans are not included in non-accrual loans.

        As evidenced by the tables below, to date, Citigroup's repurchases have primarily been from the government sponsored entities (GSEs).

        The unpaid principal balance of repurchased loans for representation and warranty claims for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009 was as follows:

 
 Three months ended June 30,  
 
 2010  2009  
In millions of dollars Unpaid Principal
Balance
 Unpaid Principal
Balance
 

GSEs

  $63  $83 

Private investors

   8   4 
      

Total

  $71  $87 
      

        The unpaid principal balance of repurchased loans for representation and warranty claims for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009 was as follows:

 
 Six months ended June 30,  
 
 2010  2009  
In millions of dollars Unpaid Principal
Balance
 Unpaid Principal
Balance
 

GSEs

  $150  $156 

Private investors

   12   10 
      

Total

  $162  $166 
      

53


Table of Contents

        In addition, Citi recorded make-whole payments of $43 million and $17 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009, respectively, and $66 million and $24 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009, respectively.

        Citi has recorded a reserve for its exposure to losses from the obligation to repurchase previously sold loans (repurchase reserve) that is included in Other liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The repurchase reserve is net of reimbursements estimated to be received by Citi for indemnification agreements relating to previous acquisitions of mortgage servicing rights. In the case of a repurchase of a credit-impaired SOP 03-3 loan, the difference between the loan's fair value and unpaid principal balance at the time of the repurchase is recorded as a utilization of the repurchase reserve. Make-whole payments to the investor are also treated as utilizations and charged directly against the reserve. The repurchase reserve is estimated when Citi sells loans (recorded as an adjustment to the gain on sale, which is included in Other revenue in the Consolidated Statement of Income) and is updated quarterly. Any change in estimate is recorded in Other revenue in the Consolidated Statement of Income.

        The repurchase reserve is calculated separately by sales vintage (i.e., the year the loans were sold) based on various assumptions. While substantially all of Citi's current loan sales are with GSEs, with which Citi has considerable historical experience, these assumptions contain a level of uncertainty and risk that, if different from actual results, could have a material impact on the reserve amounts. The most significant assumptions used to calculate the reserve levels are as follows:

    Loan documentation requests: Assumptions regarding future expected loan documentation requests exist as a means to predict future repurchase demand trends. This assumption is based on recent historical trends as well as anecdotal evidence and general industry knowledge around the current repurchase environment. For example, Citi has observed an increase in the level of staffing and focus by the GSEs to "put" more loans back to servicers. These factors are considered in the forecast of expected future repurchase claims and changes in these trends could have a positive or negative impact on Citigroup's repurchase reserve. During 2009 and the first half of 2010, loan documentation requests were trending higher than in previous periods, which in turn had a negative impact on the repurchase reserve.

    Repurchase claims as a percentage of loan documentation requests: Given that loan documentation requests are an indicator of future repurchase claims, an assumption is made regarding the conversion rate from loan documentation requests to repurchase claims. This assumption is based on historical performance and, if actual rates differ in the future, could also impact repurchase reserve levels. This percentage was generally stable during 2009 and the first quarter of 2010, but deteriorated slightly in the second quarter of 2010.

    Claims appeal success rate: This assumption represents Citi's expected success at rescinding an investor claim by satisfying the investor demand for more information, disputing the claim validity, etc. This assumption is based on recent historical successful appeals rates. These rates could fluctuate and, in Citi's experience, have historically fluctuated significantly based on changes in the validity or composition of claims. During 2009 and the first quarter of 2010, Citi's appeal success rate improved from levels in prior periods, which had a favorable impact on the repurchase reserve. However, there was a slight deterioration in the appeal success rate in the second quarter of 2010.

    Estimated loss given repurchase or make-whole: The assumption of the estimated loss amount per given repurchase or make-whole payment is applied separately for each sales vintage to capture volatile housing prices highs and lows. The assumption is based on actual and expected losses of recent repurchases/make-whole payments calculated for each sales vintage year, which are impacted by factors such as macroeconomic indicators and overall housing values. During 2009, the loss per loan on repurchases/make-whole payments increased. While Citi experienced stabilization in this metric during the first quarter of 2010, such metric slightly deteriorated in the second quarter of 2010.

        In Citi's experience to date, as stated above, the request for loan documentation packages is an early indicator of a potential claim. During 2009, loan documentation package requests and the level of outstanding claims increased. In addition, Citi's loss severity estimates increased during 2009 due to the impact of macroeconomic factors and its experience with actual losses at such time. As set forth in the tables below, these factors contributed to changes in estimates for the repurchase reserve amounting to $103 million and $247 million for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively.

        During the second quarter of 2010, loan documentation package requests and the level of outstanding claims further increased. In addition, there was an overall deterioration in the other key assumptions due to the impact of macroeconomic factors and Citi's continued experience with actual losses. These factors contributed to the $347 million change in estimate for the repurchase reserve in the quarter.

        As indicated above, the repurchase reserve is calculated by sales vintage. The majority of the repurchases in 2010 were from the 2006 through 2008 sales vintages and, in 2009, were from the 2006 and 2007 vintages, which also represent the vintages with the largest loss-given-repurchase. An insignificant percentage of 2010 and 2009 repurchases were from vintages prior to 2006, and Citi currently anticipates that this percentage will decrease, as those vintages are later in the credit cycle. Although early in the credit cycle, to date, Citi has experienced improved repurchase and loss-given-repurchase statistics from the 2009 and 2010 vintages.

54


Table of Contents

        The activity in the repurchase reserve for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009 was as follows:

 
 Three months ended June 30,  
In millions of dollars 2010  2009  

Balance, beginning of period

  $450  $218 

Additions for new sales

   4   13 

Change in estimate

   347   103 

Utilizations

   (74)  (55)
      

Balance, end of period

  $727  $279 
      

        The activity in the repurchase reserve for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009 was as follows:

 
 Six months ended June 30,  
In millions of dollars 2010  2009  

Balance, beginning of period

  $482  $75 

Additions for new sales

   9   19 

Change in estimate

   347   247 

Utilizations

   (111)  (62)
      

Balance, end of period

  $727  $279 
      

        Citi does not believe a meaningful range of reasonably possible loss related to its repurchase reserve can be determined.

        Projected future repurchases are calculated, in part, based on the level of unresolved claims at quarter-end as well as trends in claims being made by investors. For GSEs, the response to the repurchase claim is required within 90 days of the claim receipt. If Citi did not respond within 90 days, the claim would then be discussed between Citi and the GSE. For private investors, the time period for responding is governed by the individual sale agreement. If the specified timeframe is exceeded, the investor may choose to initiate legal action.

        As would be expected, as the trend in claims and inventory increases, Citi's reserve for repurchases typically increases. Included in Citi's current reserve estimate is an assumption that repurchase claims will remain at elevated levels for the foreseeable future, although the actual number of claims may differ and is subject to uncertainty. Furthermore, approximately half of the repurchase claims in Citi's recent experience have been successfully appealed and resulted in no loss to Citi.

        The number of unresolved claims by type of claimant as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, was as follows:

Number of claims June 30
2010
 December 31
2009
 

GSEs

   4,166   2,575 

Private investors

   214   309 

Mortgage insurers(1)

   98   204 
      

Total

   4,478   3,088 
      

(1)
Represents the insurer's rejection of a claim for loss reimbursement that has yet to be resolved. To the extent that mortgage insurance will not cover the claim on a loan, Citi may have to make-whole the GSE or private investor.

55


Table of Contents


Consumer Loan Details

Consumer Loan Delinquency Amounts and Ratios

 
 Total loans(6)  90+ days past due(1)  30-89 days past due(1)  
In millions of dollars, except EOP loan amounts in billions Jun.
2010
 Jun.
2010
 Mar.
2010
 Jun.
2009
 Jun.
2010
 Mar.
2010
 Jun.
2009
 

Citicorp

                      

Total

  $218.5  $3,733  $3,937  $4,289  $3,858  $4,294  $4,328 
 

Ratio

      1.71%  1.78%  1.97%  1.77%  1.94%  1.99%
                

Retail Bank

                      
 

Total

   109.1   804   782   767   1,131   1,200   1,084 
  

Ratio

      0.74%  0.71%  0.74%  1.04%  1.08%  1.05%
 

North America

   30.2   245   142   97   241   236   87 
  

Ratio

      0.81%  0.45%  0.29%  0.80%  0.75%  0.26%
 

EMEA

   4.3   50   52   70   145   182   235 
  

Ratio

      1.16%  1.06%  1.23%  3.37%  3.71%  4.12%
 

Latin America

   19.6   308   352   316   305   346   337 
  

Ratio

      1.57%  1.81%  1.92%  1.56%  1.78%  2.04%
 

Asia

   55.0   201   236   284   440   436   425 
  

Ratio

      0.37%  0.43%  0.60%  0.80%  0.80%  0.90%
                

Citi-Branded Cards(2)(3)

                      
 

Total

   109.4   2,929   3,155   3,522   2,727   3,094   3,244 
  

Ratio

      2.68%  2.86%  3.07%  2.49%  2.81%  2.83%
 

North America

   77.2   2,130   2,304   2,366   1,828   2,145   2,024 
  

Ratio

      2.76%  2.97%  2.84%  2.37%  2.76%  2.43%
 

EMEA

   2.6   72   77   99   90   113   146 
  

Ratio

      2.77%  2.66%  3.54%  3.46%  3.90%  5.21%
 

Latin America

   12.0   481   510   707   485   475   693 
  

Ratio

      4.01%  4.21%  5.84%  4.04%  3.93%  5.73%
 

Asia

   17.6   246   264   350   324   361   381 
  

Ratio

      1.40%  1.51%  2.12%  1.84%  2.06%  2.31%
                

Citi Holdings—Local Consumer Lending

                      
 

Total

   286.3   14,371   16,808   15,869   11,201   12,236   14,371 
  

Ratio

      5.24%  5.66%  4.80%  4.08%  4.12%  4.35%
 

International

   24.6   724   953   1,551   939   1,059   1,845 
  

Ratio

      2.94%  3.44%  3.93%  3.82%  3.82%  4.67%
 

North America retail partner cards(2)(3)

   50.2   2,004   2,385   2,590   2,150   2,374   2,749 
  

Ratio

      3.99%  4.38%  4.09%  4.28%  4.36%  4.34%
 

North America (excluding cards)(4)(5)

   211.5   11,643   13,470   11,728   8,112   8,803   9,777 
  

Ratio

      5.84%  6.27%  5.16%  4.07%  4.10%  4.30%
                

Total Citigroup (excluding Special Asset Pool)

  $504.8  $18,104  $20,745  $20,158  $15,059  $16,530  $18,699 
  

Ratio

      3.67%  4.01%  3.68%  3.06%  3.19%  3.41%
                

(1)
The ratios of 90 days or more past due and 30 to 89 days past due are calculated based on end-of-period loans.

(2)
The 90 days or more past due balances for Citi-branded cards and retail partner cards are generally still accruing interest. Citigroup's policy is generally to accrue interest on credit card loans until 180 days past due, unless notification of bankruptcy filing has been received earlier.

(3)
The above information presents consumer credit information on a managed basis. Citigroup adopted SFAS 166/167 effective January 1, 2010. As a result, beginning in the first quarter of 2010, there is no longer a difference between reported and managed delinquencies. Prior quarters' managed delinquencies are included herein for comparative purposes to the 2010 delinquencies. Managed basis reporting historically impacted the North America Regional Consumer Banking—Citi-branded cards and the Local Consumer Lending—retail partner cards businesses. The historical disclosures reflect the impact from credit card securitizations only. See discussion of adoption of SFAS 166/167 on page 3 and in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

(4)
The 90 days or more and 30 to 89 days past due and related ratios for North America LCL(excluding cards) exclude U.S. mortgage loans that are guaranteed by U.S. government sponsored agencies since the potential loss predominantly resides within the U.S. agencies. The amounts excluded for loans 90 days or more past due and (end-of-period loans) for each period are: $5.0 billion ($9.4 billion), $5.2 billion ($9.0 billion), and $4.3 billion ($8.7 billion) as of June 30, 2010, March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2009, respectively. The amounts excluded for loans 30 to 89 days past due (end-of-period loans have the same adjustment as above) for each period are: $1.6 billion, $1.2 billion, and $0.7 billion, as of June 30, 2010, March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2009, respectively.

(5)
The June 30, 2010 and March 31, 2010 loans 90 days or more past due and 30-89 days past due and related ratios for North America (excluding cards) excludes $2.6 billion and $2.9 billion, respectively, of loans that are carried at fair value.

(6)
Total loans include interest and fees on credit cards.

56


Table of Contents


Consumer Loan Net Credit Losses and Ratios

 
 Average
loans(1)
 Net credit losses(2)  
In millions of dollars, except average loan amounts in billions 2Q10  2Q10  1Q10  2Q09  

Citicorp

             

Total

  $217.8  $2,922  $3,040  $1,406 
 

Add: impact of credit card securitizations(3)

          1,837 
 

Managed NCL

     $2,922  $3,040  $3,243 
 

Ratio

      5.38%  5.57%  6.01%
          

Retail Bank

             
 

Total

   109.3   304   289   428 
  

Ratio

      1.12%  1.07%  1.66%
 

North America

   30.7   79   73   88 
  

Ratio

      1.03%  0.92%  1.01%
 

EMEA

   4.5   46   47   74 
  

Ratio

      4.10%  3.81%  5.30%
 

Latin America

   19.4   96   91   138 
  

Ratio

      1.98%  1.99%  3.40%
 

Asia

   54.7   83   78   128 
  

Ratio

      0.61%  0.59%  1.10%
          

Citi-Branded Cards

             
 

Total

   108.5   2,618   2,751   978 
  

Add: impact of credit card securitizations(3)

          1,837 
  

Managed NCL

      2,618   2,751   2,815 
  

Ratio

      9.68%  9.96%  10.02%
 

North America

   76.2   2,047   2,084   219 
  

Add: impact of credit card securitizations(3)

          1,837 
  

Managed NCL

      2,047   2,084   2,056 
  

Ratio

      10.77%  10.67%  10.08%
 

EMEA

   2.7   39   50   47 
  

Ratio

      5.79%  6.99%  6.73%
 

Latin America

   12.0   361   418   472 
  

Ratio

      12.07%  14.01%  15.91%
 

Asia

   17.6   171   199   240 
  

Ratio

      3.90%  4.53%  5.94%
          

Citi Holdings—Local Consumer Lending

             
 

Total

   301.7   4,535   4,938   5,144 
  

Add: impact of credit card securitizations(3)

          1,278 
  

Managed NCL

      4,535   4,938   6,422 
  

Ratio

      6.03%  6.30%  7.48%
 

International

   26.1   495   612   962 
  

Ratio

      7.61%  8.27%  9.72%
 

North America retail partner cards

   53.1   1,775   1,932   872 
  

Add: impact of credit card securitizations(3)

          1,278 
  

Managed NCL

      1,775   1,932   2,150 
  

Ratio

      13.41%  13.72%  13.58%
 

North America (excluding cards)

   222.5   2,265   2,394   3,310 
  

Ratio

      4.08%  4.20%  5.50%
          

Total Citigroup (excluding Special Asset Pool)

  $519.5  $7,457  $7,978  $6,550 
  

Add: impact of credit card securitizations(3)

          3,115 
  

Managed NCL

      7,457   7,978   9,665 
  

Ratio

      5.76%  6.00%  6.92%
          

(1)
Average loans include interest and fees on credit cards.

(2)
The ratios of net credit losses are calculated based on average loans, net of unearned income.

(3)
See page 3 and Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of the impact of SFAS 166/167.

57


Table of Contents


Consumer Loan Modification Programs

        Citigroup has instituted a variety of modification programs to assist borrowers with financial difficulties. These programs, as described below, include modifying the original loan terms, reducing interest rates, extending the remaining loan duration and/or waiving a portion of the remaining principal balance. At June 30, 2010, Citi's significant modification programs consisted of the U.S. Treasury's Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP), as well as short-term and long-term modification programs, each as summarized below.

        HAMP.    The HAMP is designed to reduce monthly first mortgage payments to a 31% housing debt ratio (monthly mortgage payment, including property taxes, insurance and homeowner dues, divided by monthly gross income) by lowering the interest rate, extending the term of the loan and deferring or forgiving principal of certain eligible borrowers who have defaulted on their mortgages or who are at risk of imminent default due to economic hardship. The interest rate reduction for first mortgages under HAMP is in effect for five years and the rate then increases up to 1% per year until the interest rate cap (the lower of the original rate or the Freddie Mac Weekly Primary Mortgage Market Survey rate for a 30-year fixed rate conforming loan as of the date of the modification) is reached.

        In order to be entitled to loan modifications, borrowers must complete a three- to- five-month trial period, make the agreed payments and provide the required documentation. Beginning March 1, 2010, documentation is required to be provided prior to beginning the trial period, whereas prior to that date, it was required to be provided before the end of the trial period. This change generally means that Citi is able to verify income up front for potential HAMP participants before they begin making lower monthly payments. Citi currently believes this change will limit the number of borrowers who ultimately fall out of the trials and potentially mitigates the impact of HAMP trial participants on early bucket delinquency data.

        During the trial period, Citi requires that the original terms of the loans remain in effect pending completion of the modification. From inception through June 30, 2010, approximately $8.5 billion of first mortgages were enrolled in the HAMP trial period, while $2.5 billion have successfully completed the trial period. Upon completion of the trial period, the terms of the loan are contractually modified, and it is accounted for as a troubled debt restructuring (see "Long-term programs" below).

        Citi also recently agreed to participate in the U.S. Treasury's HAMP second mortgage program, which requires Citi to either: (1) modify the borrower's second mortgage according to a defined protocol; or (2) accept a lump sum payment from the U.S. Treasury in exchange for full extinguishment of the second mortgage. For a borrower to qualify, the borrower must have successfully modified his/her first mortgage under the HAMP and met other criteria.

        Loans included in the HAMP trial period are not classified as modified under short-term or long-term programs, and the allowance for loan losses for these loans is calculated under ASC 450-20. See "Loan Accounting Policies" above for a further discussion of the allowance for loan losses for such modified loans.

        As of June 30, 2010, of the loans in which the trial period has ended, 37% of the loan balances were successfully modified under HAMP, 12% were modified under the Citi Supplemental program, 6% received HAMP Re-age, (as described under Consumer Loan Modification Programs) and 45% did not receive any modification from Citi to date.

        Long-term programs.    Long-term modification programs or troubled debt restructurings (TDRs) occur when the terms of a loan have been modified due to the borrowers' financial difficulties and a long-term concession has been granted to the borrower. Substantially all long-term programs in place provide interest rate reductions. See "Loan Accounting Policies" above for a discussion of the allowance for loan losses for such modified loans.

        The following table presents Citigroup's consumer loan TDRs as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. As discussed above under "HAMP", HAMP loans whose terms are contractually modified after successful completion of the trial period are included in the balances below:

 
 Accrual  Non-accrual  
In millions of dollars Jun. 30,
2010
 Dec. 31,
2009
 Jun. 30,
2010
 Dec. 31,
2009
 

Mortgage and real estate

  $14,135  $8,654  $1,776  $1,413 

Cards(1)

   4,995   2,303   34   150 

Installment and other

   3,431   3,128   333   250 
          

(1)
2010 balances reflect the adoption of SFAS 166/167.

        The predominant amount of these TDRs are concentrated in the U.S. Citi's significant long-term U.S. modification programs include:


Mortgages

        Citi Supplemental.    The Citi Supplemental (CSM) program was designed by Citi to assist borrowers ineligible for HAMP or who become ineligible through the HAMP trial period process. If the borrower already has less than a 31% housing debt ratio, the modification offered is an interest rate reduction (up to 2.5% with a floor rate of 4%) which is in effect for two years, and the rate then increases up to 1% per year until the interest rate is at the pre-modified contractual rate. If the borrower's housing debt ratio is greater than 31%, specific treatment steps for HAMP, including an interest rate reduction, will be followed to achieve a 31% housing debt ratio. The modified interest rate is in effect for two years and then increases up to 1% per year until the interest rate is at the pre-modified contractual rate. If income documentation was not supplied previously for HAMP, it is required for CSM. Three or more trial payments are required prior to modification. These payments can be made during the HAMP and/or CSM trial period.

        HAMP Re-Age.    As previously disclosed, loans in the HAMP trial period are aged according to their original contractual terms, rather than the modified HAMP terms. This results in the receivable being reported as delinquent even if the reduced payments agreed to under the program are made by the borrower. Upon conclusion of the trial period, loans that do not qualify for a long-term modification are returned to the delinquency status in which they began their trial period. However, that delinquency status would be further deteriorated for each trial payment not made (HAMP Re-age). HAMP Re-age establishes a non-interest-bearing deferral

58


Table of Contents

based on the difference between the original contractual amounts due and the HAMP trial payments made. Citigroup considers this re-age and deferral process to constitute a concession to a borrower in financial difficulty and therefore records the loans as TDRs upon re-age.

        2nd FDIC.    The 2nd FDIC modification program guidelines were created by the FDIC for delinquent or current borrowers where default is reasonably foreseeable. The program is designed for second mortgages and uses various concessions, including interest rate reductions, non-interest-bearing principal deferral, principal forgiveness, extending maturity dates, and forgiving accrued interest and late fees. These potential concessions are applied in a series of steps (similar to HAMP) that provides an affordable payment to the borrower (generally a combined housing payment ratio of 42%). The first step generally reduces the borrower's interest rate to 2% for fixed-rate home equity loans and 0.5% for home equity lines of credit. The interest rate reduction is in effect for the remaining term of the loan.

        FHA/VA.    Loans guaranteed by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) or Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) are modified through the normal modification process required by those respective agencies. Borrowers must be delinquent and concessions include interest rate reductions, principal forgiveness, extending maturity dates, and forgiving accrued interest and late fees. The interest rate reduction is in effect for the remaining loan term. Losses on FHA loans are borne by the sponsoring agency provided that the insurance has not been breached as a result of an origination defect. The VA establishes a loan-level loss cap, beyond which Citi is liable for loss. Historically, Citi's losses on FHA and VA loans have been negligible.

        CFNA Adjustment of Terms (AOT).    This program is targeted to Consumer Finance customers with a permanent hardship. Payment reduction is provided through the re-amortization of the remaining loan balance, typically at a lower interest rate Modified loan tenors may not exceed a period of 480 months. Generally, the rescheduled payment cannot be less than 50% of the original payment amount unless the AOT is a result of participation in the CitiFinancial Home Affordability Modification Program (CHAMP) or military service member's Credit Relief Act Program (SCRA), or as a result of settlement, court order, judgment, or bankruptcy. Customers must make a qualifying payment at the reduced payment amount in order to qualify for the modification. In addition, customers must provide income verification (pay stubs and/or tax returns) and monthly obligations are validated through an updated credit report.

        Other.    Prior to the implementation of the HAMP, CSM and 2nd FDIC programs, Citigroup's U.S. mortgage business offered certain borrowers various tailored modifications, which included reducing interest rates, extending the remaining loan duration and/or waiving a portion of the remaining principal balance. Citigroup currently believes that substantially all of its future long-term U.S. mortgage modifications, at least in the near term, will be included in the programs mentioned above.


North America Cards

        Paydown.    The Paydown program is designed to liquidate a customer's balance within 60 months. It is available to customers who indicate long-term hardship (e.g., long-term disability, death of a co-borrower, medical issues or a non-temporary income reduction, such as an occupation change). Payment requirements are decreased by reducing interest rates charged to either 9.9% or 0%, depending upon the customer situation, and designed to amortize at least 1% of the balance each month. Under this program, fees are discontinued, and charging privileges are permanently rescinded.

        CCG.    The CCG program handles proposals received via external consumer credit counselors on the customer's behalf. In order to qualify, customers work with a credit counseling agency to develop a plan to handle their overall budget, including money owed to Citi. A copy of the counseling agency's proposal letter is required. The annual percentage rate (APR) is reduced to 9.9%. The account fully amortizes in 60 months. Under this program, fees are discontinued, and charging privileges are permanently rescinded.

        Interest Reversal Paydown.    The Interest Reversal Paydown program is also designed to liquidate a customer's balance within 60 months. It is available to customers who indicate a long-term hardship.Accumulated interest and fees owed to Citi are reversed upon enrollment, and future interest and fees are discontinued. Payment requirements are reduced and are designed to amortize at least 1% of the balance each month. Under this program, like the programs discussed above, fees are discontinued, and charging privileges are permanently rescinded.


U.S. Installment Loans

        Auto Hardship Amendment.    This program is targeted to customers with a permanent hardship. Examples of permanent hardships include disability subsequent to loan origination, divorce where the party remaining with the vehicle does not have the necessary income to service the debt, or death of a co-borrower. In order to qualify for this program, a customer must complete an "Income and Expense Analysis" and provide proof of income. This analysis is used to determine ability to pay and to establish realistic loan terms (which generally consist of a reduction in interest rates, but could also include principal forgiveness). The borrower must make a payment within 30 days prior to the amendment.

        CFNA Adjustment of Terms (AOT).    This program is targeted to Consumer Finance customers with a permanent hardship. Payment reduction is provided through the re-amortization of the remaining loan balance, typically at a lower interest rate. Loan payments may be rescheduled over a period not to exceed 120 months. Generally, the rescheduled payment cannot be less than 50% of the original payment amount, unless the AOT is a result of a military service member's SCRA, or as a result of settlement, court order, judgment or bankruptcy. The interest rate cannot be reduced below 9% (except in the instances listed above). Customers must make a qualifying payment at the reduced payment amount in order to qualify for the modification. In addition, customers must provide proof of income and monthly obligations are validated through an updated credit report.

59


Table of Contents

        For general information on Citi's U.S. installment loan portfolio, see "U.S. Installment and Other Revolving Loans" below.

        The following table sets forth, as of June 30, 2010, information relating to Citi's significant long-term U.S. modification programs:

In millions of dollars Program
balance
 Program
start date(1)
 Average
interest rate
reduction
 Average %
payment relief
 Average
tenor of
modified loans
 Deferred
principal
 Principal
forgiveness
 

U.S. Consumer Mortgage Lending

                     
 

HAMP

 $2,331  3Q09  4% 41%32 years $289 $2 
 

Citi Supplemental

  835  4Q09  3  24 28 years  46  1 
 

HAMP Re-age

  439  1Q10  N/A  N/A 25 years  7   
 

2nd FDIC

  355  2Q09  7  48 25 years  21  6 
 

FHA/VA

  3,604     2  16 28 years     
 

Adjustment of Terms (AOTs)

  3,700     3  23 29 years       
 

Other

  3,782     4  42 28 years  33  47 

North America Cards

                     
 

Paydown

  2,218     14   60 months       
 

CCG

  1,756     10   60 months       
 

Interest Reversal Paydown

  213     18   60 months       

U.S. Installment

                     
 

Auto Hardship Amendment

  723     9  28 51 months     6 
 

AOTs

  1,062     8  34 106 months       
                

(1)
Provided if program was introduced within the last 18 months.

        Short-term programs.    Citigroup has also instituted short-term programs (primarily in the U.S.) to assist borrowers experiencing temporary hardships. These programs include short-term (12 months or less) interest rate reductions and deferrals of past due payments. The loan volume under these short-term programs has increased significantly over the past 18 months , and loan loss reserves for these loans have been enhanced, giving consideration to the higher risk associated with those borrowers and reflecting the estimated future credit losses for those loans. See "Loan Accounting Policies" above for a further discussion of the allowance for loan losses for such modified loans.

        The following table presents the amounts of gross loans modified under short-term interest rate reduction programs in the U.S. as of June 30, 2010:

 
 June 30, 2010  
In millions of dollars Accrual  Non-accrual  

Cards

 $3,732    

Mortgage and real estate

  1,812 $50 

Installment and other

  1,364  80 
      

        Significant short-term U.S. programs include:


North America Cards

        Universal Payment Program (UPP).    The North America cards business provides short-term interest rate reductions to assist borrowers experiencing temporary hardships through the UPP. Under this program, a participant's APR is reduced by at least 500 basis points for a period of up to 12 months. The minimum payment is tailored to the customer's needs and is designed to amortize at least 1% of the principal balance each month. The participant's APR returns to its original rate at the end of the term or earlier if they fail to make the required payments.


U.S. Consumer Mortgage Lending

        Temporary AOT.    This program is targeted to Consumer Finance customers with a temporary hardship. Examples of temporary hardships would include a short-term medical disability or a temporary reduction of pay. Under this program, the interest rate is reduced for either a five- or an eleven-month period. At the end of the temporary modification period, the interest rate reverts to the pre-modification amount. If the customer is still undergoing hardship at the conclusion of the temporary payment reduction, a second extension of the temporary terms can be considered in either of the time period increments above. In cases where the account is severely past due (over 60 days past due) at the expiration of the temporary modification period, the terms of the modification are made permanent and the payment is kept at the reduced amount for the remaining life of the loan.


U.S Installment and Other Revolving Loans

        Temporary AOT.    This program is targeted to Consumer Finance customers with a temporary hardship. Under this program, the interest rate is reduced for either a five- or an eleven-month period. At the end of the temporary modification period, the interest rate reverts to the pre-modification amount. If the customer is still undergoing hardship at the conclusion

60


Table of Contents

of the temporary payment reduction, a second extension of the temporary terms can be considered in either of the time period increments above. In cases where the account is severely past due (over 90 days past due) at the expiration of the temporary modification period, the terms of the modification are made permanent and the payment is kept at the reduced amount for the remaining life of the loan.

        The following table set forth, as of June 30, 2010, information related to Citi's significant short-term U.S. modification programs:

In millions of dollars Program
balance
 Program
start date(1)
 Average
interest rate
reduction
 Average
time period
for
reduction

UPP

 $3,732     19%12 months

U.S. Consumer Mortgage Temporary AOT

  1,852  1Q09  3%8 months

U.S. Installment Temporary AOT

  1,444  1Q09  5%7 months
         

(1)
Provided if program was introduced within the last 18 months.

        Payment deferrals that do not continue to accrue interest (extensions) primarily occur in the U.S. residential mortgage business. Under an extension, payments that are contractually due are deferred to a later date, thereby extending the maturity date by the number of months of payments being deferred. Extensions assist delinquent borrowers who have experienced short-term financial difficulties that have been resolved by the time the extension is granted. An extension can only be offered to borrowers who are past due on their monthly payments but have since demonstrated the ability and willingness to pay as agreed. Other payment deferrals continue to accrue interest and are not deemed to offer concessions to the customer. Other types of concessions are not material.

        Please see "U.S. Consumer Mortgage Lending," "North America Cards," and "U.S. Installment and Other Revolving Loans" below for a discussion of the impact, to date, of Citi's significant U.S. loan modification programs described above on the respective loan portfolios.

61


Table of Contents

U.S. Consumer Mortgage Lending

Overview

        Citi's North America consumer mortgage portfolio consists of both first lien and second lien mortgages. As of June 30, 2010, the first lien mortgage portfolio totaled approximately $109 billion while the second lien mortgage portfolio was approximately $53 billion. Although the majority of the mortgage portfolio is reported in LCL within Citi Holdings, there are $18 billion of first lien mortgages and $5 billion of second lien mortgages reported in Citicorp.

        Citi's first lien mortgage portfolio includes $9.6 billion of loans with Federal Housing Administration (FHA) or Veterans Administration (VA) guarantees. These portfolios consist of loans originated to low-to-moderate-income borrowers with lower FICO (Fair Isaac Corporation) scores and generally have higher loan-to-value ratios (LTVs). Losses on FHA loans are borne by the sponsoring agency, provided that the insurance has not been breached as a result of an origination defect. The VA establishes a loan-level loss cap, beyond which Citi is liable for loss. FHA and VA loans have high delinquency rates but, given the guarantees, Citi has experienced negligible credit losses on these loans. The first lien mortgage portfolio also includes $1.8 billion of loans with LTVs above 80%, which have insurance through private mortgage insurance (PMI) companies, and $2.0 billion of loans subject to long-term standby commitments(1) (LTSC), with U.S. government sponsored entities (GSEs), for which Citi has limited exposure to credit losses. Citi's second lien mortgage portfolio also includes $1.5 billion of loans subject to LTSCs with GSEs, for which Citi has limited exposure to credit losses. Citi's allowance for loan loss calculations take into consideration the impact of these guarantees.

Impact of Mortgage Modification Programs on Consumer Mortgage Portfolio

        As discussed in "Consumer Loan Modification Programs" above, Citigroup also offers short-term and long-term real estate loan modification programs. The main objective of these programs is generally to reduce the payment burden for the borrower and improve the net present value of cash flows. Citi monitors the performance of its real estate loan modification programs by tracking credit loss rates by vintage. At 18 months after modifying an account, in Citi's experience to date, credit loss rates are typically reduced by approximately one-third compared to accounts that were not modified.

        Citigroup considers a combination of historical re-default rates, the current economic environment, and the nature of the modification program in forecasting expected cash flows in the determination of the allowance for loan losses on TDRs. With respect to HAMP, contractual modifications of loans that successfully completed the HAMP trial period began in the third quarter of 2009; accordingly, this is the earliest HAMP vintage available for comparison. While Citi continues to evaluate the impact of HAMP, Citi's experience to date is that re-default rates are likely to be lower for HAMP-modified loans as compared to Citi Supplemental modifications due to what it believes to be the deeper payment and interest rate reductions associated with HAMP modifications.

Consumer Mortgage Quarterly Trends—Delinquencies and Net Credit Losses

        The following charts detail the quarterly trends in delinquencies and net credit losses for the Citi's first and second lien North America consumer mortgage portfolios.

        In the first lien mortgage portfolio, as previously disclosed, both delinquencies and net credit losses have continued to be impacted by the HAMP trial loans and the growing backlog of foreclosures in process. As previously disclosed, loans in the HAMP trial modification period that do not make their original contractual payments are reported as delinquent, even if the reduced payments agreed to under the program are made by the borrower. Upon conclusion of the trial period, loans that are not modified permanently are returned to the delinquency status in which they began their trial period, adjusted for the number of payments received during the trial period. If the loans are modified permanently, they will be returned to current status.

        In addition, the growing amount of foreclosures in process, which continues to be related to an industry-wide phenomenon resulting from foreclosure moratoria and other efforts to prevent or forestall foreclosure, have specific implications for the portfolio:

    They tend to inflate the amount of 180+ day delinquencies in our mortgage statistics.

    They can result in increasing levels of consumer non-accrual loans, as Citi is unable to take possession of the underlying assets and sell these properties on a timely basis.

    They could have a dampening effect on net interest margin as non-accrual assets build on the company's balance sheet.

As set forth in the charts below, both first and second lien mortgages experienced fewer 90 days or more delinquencies in the second quarter of 2010, which led to lower net credit losses in the quarter as well. For first lien mortgages, the sequential improvement in 90 days or more delinquencies was driven entirely by asset sales and HAMP trials converting into permanent modifications. In the quarter, Citi sold $1.3 billion in delinquent mortgages. As of June 30, 2010, $2.5 billion of HAMP trial modifications in Citi's on-balance sheet portfolio were converted to permanent modifications, up from $1.6 billion at the end of the first quarter of 2010. For second lien mortgages, the net credit loss decrease during the quarter was driven by roll rate improvement.


(1)
A LTSC is a structured transaction in which Citi transfers the credit risk of certain eligible loans to an investor in exchange for a fee. These loans remain on balance sheet unless they reach a certain delinquency level (between 120 and 180 days), in which case the LTSC investor is required to buy the loan at par.

62


Table of Contents

GRAPHIC

Note: Includes loans for Canada and Puerto Rico. Loans 90 days or more past due exclude loans recorded at fair value and U.S. mortgage loans that are guaranteed by U.S. government-sponsored agencies because the potential loss predominately resides with the U.S. agencies.

GRAPHIC

Note: Includes loans for Canada and Puerto Rico. Loans 90 days or more past due exclude loans recorded at fair value and U.S. mortgage loans that are guaranteed by U.S. government-sponsored agencies because the potential loss predominately resides with the U.S. agencies.

63


Table of Contents

Consumer Mortgage FICO and LTV

        Data appearing in the tables below have been sourced from Citigroup's risk systems and, as such, may not reconcile with disclosures elsewhere generally due to differences in methodology or variations in the manner in which information is captured. Citi has noted such variations in instances where it believes they could be material to reconcile the information presented elsewhere.

        Citi's credit risk policy is not to offer option adjustable rate mortgages (ARMs)/negative amortizing mortgage products to its customers. As a result, option ARMs/negative amortizing mortgages represent an insignificant portion of total balances since they were acquired only incidentally as part of prior portfolio and business purchases.

        A portion of loans in the U.S. consumer mortgage portfolio currently requires a payment to satisfy only the current accrued interest for the payment period, or an interest-only payment. Citi's mortgage portfolio includes approximately $28 billion of first- and second- lien home equity lines of credit (HELOCs) that are still within their revolving period and have not commenced amortization. The interest-only payment feature during the revolving period is standard for the HELOC product across the industry. The first lien mortgage portfolio contains approximately $30 billion of ARMs that are currently required to make an interest-only payment. These loans will be required to make a fully amortizing payment upon expiration of their interest-only payment period, and most will do so within a few years of origination. Borrowers that are currently required to make an interest-only payment cannot select a lower payment that would negatively amortize the loan. First lien mortgage loans with this payment feature are primarily to high credit quality borrowers that have on average significantly higher refreshed FICO scores than other loans in the first lien mortgage portfolio.

Loan Balances

        First Lien Mortgages—Loan Balances.    As a consequence of the difficult economic environment and the decrease in housing prices, LTV and FICO scores have generally deteriorated since origination, as depicted in the table below. On a refreshed basis, approximately 31% of first lien mortgages had a LTV ratio above 100%, compared to approximately 0% at origination. Approximately 29% of the first lien mortgages had FICO scores less than 620 on a refreshed basis, compared to 16% at origination.

Balances: June 30, 2010—First Lien Mortgages

At Origination
 FICO³660  620£FICO<660  FICO<620  

LTV £ 80%

   58% 6% 7%

80% < LTV £ 100%

   13% 7% 9%

LTV > 100%

   NM  NM  NM 

 

Refreshed
 FICO³660  620£FICO<660  FICO<620  

LTV £ 80%

   26% 4% 9%

80% < LTV £ 100%

   18% 3% 9%

LTV > 100%

   16% 4% 11%

Note: NM—Not meaningful. First lien mortgage table excludes loans in Canada and Puerto Rico. Table excludes loans guaranteed by U.S. government sponsored agencies, loans recorded at fair value and loans subject to LTSCs. Table also excludes $1.7 billion from At Origination balances and $0.4 billion from Refreshed balances for which FICO or LTV data was unavailable. Balances exclude deferred fees/costs. Refreshed FICO scores based on updated credit scores obtained from Fair Isaac Corporation. Refreshed LTV ratios are derived from data at origination updated using mainly the Loan Performance Price Index or the Federal Housing Finance Agency Price Index.

        Second Lien Mortgages—Loan Balances.    In the second lien mortgage portfolio, the majority of loans are in the higher FICO categories. The challenging economic conditions have generally caused a migration towards lower FICO scores and higher LTV ratios. Approximately 47% of second lien mortgages had refreshed LTVs above 100%, compared to approximately 0% at origination. Approximately 18% of second lien mortgages had FICO scores less than 620 on a refreshed basis, compared to 3% at origination.

64


Table of Contents

Balances: June 30, 2010—Second Lien Mortgages

At Origination
 FICO³660  620£FICO<660  FICO<620  

LTV £ 80%

   49% 2% 2%

80% < LTV £ 100%

   43% 3% 1%

LTV > 100%

   NM  NM  NM 

 

Refreshed
 FICO³660  620£FICO<660  FICO<620  

LTV £ 80%

   22% 1% 3%

80% < LTV £ 100%

   21% 2% 4%

LTV > 100%

   32% 4% 11%
        

Note: N.M.—Not meaningful. Second lien mortgage table excludes loans in Canada and Puerto Rico. Table excludes loans recorded at fair value and loans subject to LTSCs. Table also excludes $1.6 billion from At Origination balances and $0.4 billion from Refreshed balances for which FICO or LTV data was unavailable. Refreshed FICO scores are based on updated credit scores obtained from Fair Isaac Corporation. Refreshed LTV ratios are derived from data at origination updated using mainly the Loan Performance Price Index or the Federal Housing Finance Agency Price Index.

Delinquencies

        The tables below provide delinquency statistics for loans 90 or more days past due (90+DPD), as a percentage of outstandings in each of the FICO/LTV combinations, in both the first lien and second lien mortgage portfolios. For example, loans with FICO ³ 660 and LTV £ 80% at origination have a 90+DPD rate of 5.8%.

        Loans with FICO scores of less than 620 exhibit significantly higher delinquencies than in any other FICO band. Similarly, loans with LTVs greater than 100% have higher delinquencies than LTVs of less than or equal to 100%.

Delinquencies: 90+DPD Rates—First Lien Mortgages

At Origination
 FICO³660  620£FICO<660  FICO<620  

LTV £ 80%

   5.8% 11.0% 12.1%

80% < LTV £ 100%

   8.1% 13.5% 16.8%

LTV > 100%

   NM  NM  NM 

 

Refreshed
 FICO³660  620£FICO<660  FICO<620  

LTV £ 80%

   0.3% 3.3% 15.0%

80% < LTV £ 100%

   0.8% 7.8% 22.6%

LTV > 100%

   2.0% 15.4% 30.3%
        

Note: NM—Not meaningful. 90+DPD are based on balances referenced in the tables above.

Delinquencies: 90+DPD Rates—Second Lien Mortgages

At Origination
 FICO³660  620£FICO<660  FICO<620  

LTV £ 80%

   1.6% 4.2% 5.1%

80% < LTV £ 100%

   3.7% 4.9% 7.0%

LTV > 100%

   NM  NM  NM 

 

Refreshed
 FICO³660  620£FICO<660  FICO<620  

LTV £ 80%

   0.1% 1.2% 8.2%

80% < LTV £ 100%

   0.1% 1.3% 9.6%

LTV > 100%

   0.4% 3.1% 16.6%

Note: NM—Not meaningful. 90+DPD are based on balances referenced in the tables above.

Origination Channel, Geographic Distribution and Origination Vintage

        The following tables detail Citi's first and second lien U.S. consumer mortgage portfolio by origination channels, geographic distribution and origination vintage.

By Origination Channel

        Citi's U.S. consumer mortgage portfolio has been originated from three main channels: retail, broker and correspondent.

    Retail: loans originated through a direct relationship with the borrower.

    Broker: loans originated through a mortgage broker, where Citi underwrites the loan directly with the borrower.

    Correspondent: loans originated and funded by a third party, where Citi purchases the closed loans after the correspondent has funded the loan. This channel includes loans acquired in large bulk purchases from other mortgage originators primarily in 2006 and 2007. Such bulk purchases were discontinued in 2007.

First Lien Mortgages: June 30, 2010

        As of June 30, 2010, approximately 54% of the first lien mortgage portfolio was originated through third-party channels. Given that loans originated through correspondents have exhibited higher 90+DPD delinquency rates than retail originated mortgages, Citi terminated business with a number of correspondent sellers in 2007 and 2008. During 2008, Citi also severed relationships with a number of brokers, only maintaining those who have produced strong, high-quality and profitable volume.

CHANNEL
($ in billions)
 First Lien
Mortgages
 Channel
% Total
 90+DPD %  *FICO < 620  *LTV > 100%  

Retail

 $44.4  46.3% 5.2%$13.6 $9.5 

Broker

 $16.7  17.4% 8.2%$3.1 $5.6 

Correspondent

 $34.8  36.3% 12.3%$11.6 $13.9 

*
Refreshed FICO and LTV.

Note: First lien mortgage table excludes Canada and Puerto Rico, deferred fees/costs, loans recorded at fair value, loans guaranteed by U.S. government sponsored agencies and loans subject to LTSCs.

65


Table of Contents

Second Lien Mortgages: June 30, 2010

        For second lien mortgages, approximately 48% of the loans were originated through third-party channels. As these mortgages have demonstrated a higher incidence of delinquencies, Citi no longer originates second mortgages through third-party channels.

CHANNEL
($ in billions)
 Second Lien
Mortgages
 Channel
% Total
 90+DPD %  *FICO < 620  *LTV > 100%  

Retail

 $23.9  52.2% 1.8%$3.8 $7.1 

Broker

 $11.3  24.8% 3.8%$2.0 $6.8 

Correspondent

 $10.5  23.0% 4.1%$2.5 $7.5 

*
Refreshed FICO and LTV.

Note: Excludes Canada and Puerto Rico, loans recorded at fair value and loans subject to LTSCs.

By State

        Approximately half of the Citi's U.S. consumer mortgage portfolio is located in five states: California, New York, Florida, Illinois and Texas. These states represent 50% of first lien mortgages and 55% of second lien mortgages.

        Florida and Illinois have above average 90+DPD delinquency rates. Florida has 54% of its first mortgage lien portfolio with refreshed LTV>100%, compared to 30% overall for first lien mortgages. Illinois has 45% of its loan portfolio with refreshed LTV>100%. Texas, despite having 41% of its portfolio with FICO<620, has a lower delinquency rate relative to the overall portfolio. Texas has 5% of its loan portfolio with refreshed LTV>100%.

First Lien Mortgages: June 30, 2010

STATES
($ in billions)
 First Lien
Mortgages
 State
% Total
 90+DPD %  *FICO < 620  *LTV > 100%  

California

 $26.1  27.2% 7.2%$4.0 $10.0 

New York

 $7.9  8.2% 6.4%$1.5 $0.9 

Florida

 $5.8  6.1% 13.0%$2.1 $3.1 

Illinois

 $4.0  4.2% 9.8%$1.3 $1.8 

Texas

 $3.9  4.1% 5.7%$1.6 $0.2 

Others

 $48.2  50.2% 8.7%$17.9 $13.1 

*
Refreshed FICO and LTV.

Note: First lien mortgage table excludes Canada and Puerto Rico, deferred fees/costs, loans recorded at fair value, loans guaranteed by U.S. government sponsored agencies and loans subject to LTSCs.

        In the second lien mortgage portfolio, Florida continues to experience above-average delinquencies, with approximately 71% of their loans with refreshed LTV > 100% compared to 47% overall for second lien mortgages.

Second Lien Mortgages: June 30, 2010

STATES
($ in billions)
 Second Lien
Mortgages
 State
% Total
 90+DPD %  *FICO < 620  *LTV > 100%  

California

 $12.8  27.9% 3.0%$1.8 $6.4 

New York

 $6.3  13.8% 2.2%$0.9 $1.4 

Florida

 $2.9  6.4% 4.8%$0.7 $2.1 

Illinois

 $1.8  3.9% 2.6%$0.3 $1.1 

Texas

 $1.3  2.8% 1.3%$0.2 $0.4 

Others

 $20.7  45.2% 2.7%$4.4 $9.9 

*
Refreshed FICO and LTV.

Note: Excludes Canada and Puerto Rico, loans recorded at fair value and loans subject to LTSCs.

By Vintage

        For Citigroup's combined U.S. consumer mortgage portfolio (first and second lien mortgages), approximately half of the portfolio consists of 2006 and 2007 vintages, which demonstrate above average delinquencies. In first mortgages, approximately 43% of the portfolio is of 2006 and 2007 vintages, which have 90+DPD rates well above the overall portfolio rate. In second mortgages, 62% of the portfolio is of 2006 and 2007 vintages, which again have higher delinquencies compared to the overall portfolio rate.

First Lien Mortgages: June 30, 2010

VINTAGES
($ in billions)
 First Lien
Mortgages
 Vintage
% Total
 90+DPD %  *FICO < 620  *LTV > 100%  

2010

 $0.7  0.7% 0.0%$0.1 $0.1 

2009

 $3.8  4.0% 0.7%$0.5 $0.2 

2008

 $12.3  12.9% 4.9%$2.8 $2.5 

2007

 $23.9  25.0% 12.2%$8.7 $11.6 

2006

 $17.1  17.8% 10.7%$5.4 $8.1 

2005

 $16.5  17.2% 6.6%$3.9 $5.1 

£ 2004

 $21.6  22.5% 6.9%$6.8 $1.5 

*
Refreshed FICO and LTV.

Note: First lien mortgage table excludes Canada and Puerto Rico, deferred fees/costs, loans recorded at fair value, loans guaranteed by U.S. government sponsored agencies and loans subject to LTSCs.

66


Table of Contents

Second Lien Mortgages: June 30, 2010

VINTAGES
($ in billions)
 Second Lien
Mortgages
 Vintage
% Total
 90+DPD %  *FICO < 620  *LTV > 100%  

2010

 $0.1  0.3% 0.0%$0.0 $0.0 

2009

 $0.6  1.3% 0.2%$0.0 $0.0 

2008

 $4.0  8.8% 1.1%$0.6 $0.7 

2007

 $13.4  29.4% 3.2%$2.7 $7.2 

2006

 $14.7  32.2% 3.4%$2.9 $8.9 

2005

 $8.8  19.2% 2.6%$1.4 $4.0 

£ 2004

 $4.0  8.7% 1.7%$0.6 $0.5 

*
Refreshed FICO and LTV.

Note: Excludes Canada and Puerto Rico, loans recorded at fair value and loans subject to LTSCs.

North America Cards

Overview

        Citi's North America cards portfolio consists of our Citi-branded and retail partner cards portfolios located in Citicorp—Regional Consumer Banking and Citi Holdings—Local Consumer Lending, respectively. As of June 30, 2010, the Citi-branded portfolio totaled approximately $77 billion, while the retail partner cards portfolio was approximately $50 billion.

Impact of Loss Mitigation and Cards Modification Programs on Cards Portfolios

        In each of its Citi-branded and retail partner cards portfolios, Citi continues to actively eliminate riskier accounts to mitigate losses. Higher risk customers have either had their available lines of credit reduced or their accounts closed. On a net basis, end of period open accounts are down 15% in Citi-branded cards and down 13% in retail partner cards versus prior-year levels.

        As previously disclosed, in Citi's experience to date, these portfolios have significantly different characteristics:

    Citi-branded cards tend to have a longer estimated account life, with higher credit lines and balances reflecting the greater utility of a multi-purpose credit card.

    Retail partner cards tend to have a shorter account life, with smaller credit lines and balances. The account portfolio, by its nature, turns faster and the loan balances reflect more recent vintages.

        As a result, loss mitigation efforts, such as stricter underwriting standards for new accounts, decreasing higher risk credit lines, closing high risk accounts and re-pricing, have tended to affect the retail partner cards portfolio faster than the branded portfolio.

        In addition to tightening credit standards, Citi also offers short-term and long-term cards modification programs, as discussed under "Consumer Loan Modification Programs" above. Citigroup monitors the performance of these U.S. credit card short-term and long-term modification programs by tracking cumulative loss rates by vintages (when customers enter a program) and comparing that performance with that of similar accounts whose terms were not modified. For example, as previously reported, for U.S. credit cards, in Citi's experience to date, at 24 months after modifying an account, Citi typically reduces credit losses by approximately one-third compared to similar accounts that were not modified. This improved performance of modified loans relative to those not modified has generally been the greatest during the first 12 months after modification. Following that period, losses have tended to increase, but have typically stabilized at levels which are still below those for similar loans that were not modified, resulting in an improved cumulative loss performance. In addition, during the second quarter of 2010, Citi placed fewer accounts into these programs and the results for these programs have remained positive.

        Overall, however, Citi continues to believe that net credit losses in each of its cards portfolios will likely continue to remain at elevated levels and will continue to be highly dependent on macroeconomic conditions and industry changes, including continued implementation of the CARD Act.

Cards Quarterly Trends—Delinquencies and Net Credit Losses

        The following charts detail the quarterly trends in delinquencies and net credit losses for Citigroup's North America Citi-branded and retail partner cards portfolios.

        During the second quarter of 2010, Citi continued to see stable to improving trends across both portfolios, based in part, it believes, on its loss mitigation programs, as previously discussed. Across both portfolios, delinquencies declined during the second quarter of 2010. In Citi-branded cards, net credit losses declined sequentially. On a percentage basis, however, net credit losses were up in Citi-branded cards due to declining loan balances. In retail partner cards, net credit losses declined for the fourth consecutive quarter.

67


Table of Contents

GRAPHIC


Note: Includes Puerto Rico.

GRAPHIC


Note: Includes Canada and Puerto Rico. Includes Installment Lending.

68


Table of Contents

North America Cards—FICO Information

        As set forth in the table below, approximately 73% of the Citi-branded portfolio had FICO credit scores of at least 660 on a refreshed basis as of June 30, 2010, while 65% of the retail partner cards portfolio had scores above 660.

Balances: June 30, 2010

Refreshed
 Citi Branded  Retail Partners  

FICO ³ 660

   73%  65%

620 £ FICO < 660

   11%  13%

FICO < 620

   16%  22%

Note: Based on balances of $120 billion. Balances include interest and fees. Excludes Canada, Puerto Rico and Installment and Classified portfolios. Excludes balances where FICO was unavailable ($2.4 billion for Citi-branded, $2.1 billion for retail partner cards).

        The table below provides delinquency statistics for loans 90+DPD for both the Citi-branded and retail partner cards portfolios as of June 30, 2010. Given the economic environment, customers have generally migrated down from higher FICO score ranges, driven by their delinquencies with Citi and/or with other creditors. As these customers roll through the delinquency buckets, they materially damage their credit score and may ultimately go to charge-off. Loans 90+DPD are more likely to be associated with low refreshed FICO scores both because low scores are indicative of repayment risk and because their delinquency has been reported by Citigroup to the credit bureaus. Loans with FICO scores less than 620, which constitute 16% of the Citi-branded portfolio, have a 90+DPD rate of 16.3%; in the retail partner cards portfolio, loans with FICO scores less than 620 constitute 22% of the portfolio and have a 90+DPD rate of 16.7%.

90+DPD Delinquency Rate: June 30, 2010

Refreshed
 Citi Branded
90+DPD%
 Retail Partners
90+DPD%
 

FICO ³ 660

   0.2%  0.2%

620 £ FICO < 660

   0.7%  0.8%

FICO < 620

   16.3%  16.7%

Note: Based on balances of $120 billion. Balances include interest and fees. Excludes Canada, Puerto Rico and Installment and Classified portfolios.

U.S. Installment and Other Revolving Loans

        In the table below, the U.S. installment portfolio consists of consumer loans in the following businesses: Consumer Finance, Retail Banking, Auto, Student Lending and Cards. Other Revolving consists of consumer loans (Ready Credit and Checking Plus products) in the Consumer Retail Banking business. Commercial-related loans are not included.

        As of June 30, 2010, the U.S. Installment portfolio totaled approximately $64 billion, while the U.S. Other Revolving portfolio was approximately $0.9 billion. While substantially all of the U.S. Installment portfolio is reported in LCL within Citi Holdings, it does include $0.4 billion of Consumer Retail Banking loans which are reported in Citicorp. The U.S. Other Revolving portfolio is managed under Citicorp. As of June 30, 2010, the U.S. Installment portfolio included approximately $33 billion of Student Loans originated under the Federal Family Education Loan Program (FFELP) where losses are substantially mitigated by federal guarantees if the loans are properly serviced. In addition, there were approximately $6 billion of non-FFELP Student Loans where losses are mitigated by private insurance. These insurance providers insure Citi against a significant portion of losses arising from borrower loan default, bankruptcy or death.

        Approximately 37% of the Installment portfolio had FICO credit scores less than 620 on a refreshed basis. Approximately 26% of the Other Revolving portfolio is composed of loans having FICO less than 620.

Balances: June 30, 2010

Refreshed
 Installment  Other Revolving  

FICO ³ 660

   50%  59%

620 £ FICO < 660

   13%  15%

FICO < 620

   37%  26%

Note: Based on balances of $62 billion for Installment and $0.8 billion for Other Revolving. Excludes Canada and Puerto Rico. Excludes balances where FICO was unavailable ($1.6 billion for Installment, $0.1 billion for Other Revolving).

        The table below provides delinquency statistics for loans 90+DPD for both the Installment and Other Revolving portfolios. Loans 90+DPD are more likely to be associated with low refreshed FICO scores both because low scores are indicative of repayment risk and because their delinquency has been reported by Citigroup to the credit bureaus. On a refreshed basis, loans with FICO scores of less than 620 exhibit significantly higher delinquencies than in any other FICO band and will drive the majority of the losses.

90+DPD Delinquency Rate: June 30, 2010

Refreshed
 Installment
90+DPD%
 Other Revolving
90+DPD%
 

FICO ³ 660

   0.2%  0.4%

620 £ FICO < 660

   1.3%  1.3%

FICO < 620

   7.7%  6.6%

Note: Based on balances of $62 billion for Installment and $0.8 billion for Other Revolving. Excludes Canada and Puerto Rico.

69


Table of Contents

Interest Rate Risk Associated with Consumer Mortgage Lending Activity

        Citigroup originates and funds mortgage loans. As with all other lending activity, this exposes Citigroup to several risks, including credit, liquidity and interest rate risks. To manage credit and liquidity risk, Citigroup sells most of the mortgage loans it originates, but retains the servicing rights. These sale transactions create an intangible asset referred to as mortgage servicing rights (MSRs). The fair value of this asset is primarily affected by changes in prepayments that result from shifts in mortgage interest rates. The fair value of MSRs declines with increased prepayments, and lower interest rates are generally one factor that tends to lead to increased prepayments. Thus, by retaining risks of sold mortgage loans, Citigroup is exposed to interest rate risk.

        In managing this risk, Citigroup hedges a significant portion of the value of its MSRs through the use of interest rate derivative contracts, forward purchase commitments of mortgage-backed securities, and purchased securities classified as trading (primarily mortgage-backed securities including principal-only strips).

        Since the change in the value of these hedging instruments does not perfectly match the change in the value of the MSRs, Citigroup is still exposed to what is commonly referred to as "basis risk." Citigroup manages this risk by reviewing the mix of the various hedging instruments referred to above on a daily basis.

        Citigroup's MSRs totaled $4.894 billion and $6.530 billion at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. For additional information on Citi's MSRs, see Notes 11 and 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

        As part of the mortgage lending activity, Citigroup commonly enters into purchase commitments to fund residential mortgage loans at specific interest rates within a given period of time, generally up to 60 days after the rate has been set. If the resulting loans from these commitments will be classified as loans held-for-sale, Citigroup accounts for the commitments as derivatives. Accordingly, the initial and subsequent changes in the fair value of these commitments, which are driven by changes in mortgage interest rates, are recognized in current earnings after taking into consideration the likelihood that the commitment will be funded.

        Citigroup hedges its exposure to the change in the value of these commitments by utilizing hedging instruments similar to those referred to above.

70


Table of Contents


CORPORATE CREDIT PORTFOLIO

        The following table presents credit data for Citigroup's corporate loans and unfunded lending commitments at June 30, 2010. The ratings scale is based on Citi's internal risk ratings, which generally correspond to the ratings as defined by S&P and Moody's.

 
 At June 30, 2010  
Corporate loans(1)
in millions of dollars
 Recorded investment
in loans(2)
 % of total(3)  Unfunded
lending commitments
 % of total(3)  

Investment grade(4)

  $118,470   69% $231,863   87%

Non-investment grade(4)

             
 

Noncriticized

   21,312   12   16,911   6 
 

Criticized performing(5)

   21,065   12   14,108   6 
  

Commercial real estate (CRE)

   5,623   3   1,781   1 
  

Commercial and Industrial and Other

   15,442   9   12,327   5 
 

Non-accrual (criticized)(5)

   11,036   6   3,043   1 
  

CRE

   2,568   1   988   
  

Commercial and Industrial and Other

   8,468   5   2,055   1 
          

Total non-investment grade

  $53,413   31% $34,062   13%

Private Banking loans managed on a delinquency basis(4)

   13,738      2,216    

Loans at fair value

   2,358         
          

Total corporate loans

  $187,979     $268,141    

Unearned income

   (1,259)        
          

Corporate loans, net of unearned income

  $186,720     $268,141    
          

(1)
Includes $765 million of TDRs for which concessions, such as the reduction of interest rates or the deferral of interest or principal payments, have been granted as a result of deterioration in the borrowers' financial condition. Each of the borrowers is current under the restructured terms.

(2)
Recorded investment in a loan includes accrued interest, net deferred loan fees and costs, unamortized premium or discount, less any direct write-downs.

(3)
Percentages disclosed above exclude Private Banking loans managed on a delinquency basis and loans at fair value.

(4)
Held-for-investment loans accounted for on an amortized cost basis.

(5)
Criticized exposures correspond to the "Special Mention," "Substandard" and "Doubtful" asset categories defined by banking regulatory authorities.

71


Table of Contents

        The following tables represent the corporate credit portfolio (excluding Private Banking), before consideration of collateral, by maturity at June 30, 2010. The corporate portfolio is broken out by direct outstandings that include drawn loans, overdrafts, interbank placements, bankers' acceptances, certain investment securities and leases and unfunded commitments that include unused commitments to lend, letters of credit and financial guarantees.

 
 At June 30, 2010  
In billions of dollars Due
within
1 year
 Greater
than 1 year
but within
5 years
 Greater
than
5 years
 Total
exposure
 

Direct outstandings

  $177  $46  $8  $231 

Unfunded lending commitments

   159   94   10   263 
          

Total

  $336  $140  $18  $494 
          

 

 
 At December 31, 2009  
In billions of dollars Due
within
1 year
 Greater
than 1 year
but within
5 years
 Greater
than
5 years
 Total
exposure
 

Direct outstandings

  $213  $66  $7  $286 

Unfunded lending commitments

   182   120   10   312 
          

Total

  $395  $186  $17  $598 
          

Portfolio Mix

        The corporate credit portfolio is diverse across counterparty, and industry and geography. The following table shows direct outstandings and unfunded commitments by region:

 
 June 30,
2010
 December 31,
2009
 

North America

   47%  51%

EMEA

   30   27 

Latin America

   7   9 

Asia

   16   13 
      

Total

   100%  100%
      

        The maintenance of accurate and consistent risk ratings across the corporate credit portfolio facilitates the comparison of credit exposure across all lines of business, geographic regions and products.

        Obligor risk ratings reflect an estimated probability of default for an obligor and are derived primarily through the use of statistical models (which are validated periodically), external rating agencies (under defined circumstances) or approved scoring methodologies. Facility risk ratings are assigned, using the obligor risk rating, and then factors that affect the loss given default of the facility, such as support or collateral, are taken into account. With regard to climate change risk, factors evaluated include consideration of the business impact, impact of regulatory requirements, or lack thereof, and impact of physical effects on obligors and their assets.

        These factors may adversely affect the ability of some obligors to perform and thus increase the risk of lending activities to these obligors. Citigroup also has incorporated climate risk assessment criteria for certain obligors, as necessary.

        Internal obligor ratings equivalent to BBB and above are considered investment grade. Ratings below the equivalent of the BBB category are considered non-investment grade.

        The following table presents the corporate credit portfolio by facility risk rating at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, as a percentage of the total portfolio:

 
 Direct outstandings and
unfunded commitments
 
 
 June 30,
2010
 December 31,
2009
 

AAA/AA/A

   55%  58%

BBB

   25   24 

BB/B

   13   11 

CCC or below

   7   7 

Unrated

     
      

Total

   100%  100%
      

        The corporate credit portfolio is diversified by industry, with a concentration only in the financial sector, including banks, other financial institutions, insurance companies, investment banks, and government and central banks. The following table shows the allocation of direct outstandings and unfunded commitments to industries as a percentage of the total corporate portfolio:

 
 Direct outstandings and
unfunded commitments
 
 
 June 30,
2010
 December 31,
2009
 

Government and central banks

   12%  12%

Banks

   8   9 

Investment banks

   7   5 

Other financial institutions

   5   12 

Petroleum

   5   4 

Utilities

   4   4 

Insurance

   4   4 

Agriculture and food preparation

   4   4 

Telephone and cable

   3   3 

Industrial machinery and equipment

   3   2 

Real estate

   3   3 

Global information technology

   2   2 

Chemicals

   2   2 

Other industries(1)

   38   34 
      

Total

   100%  100%
      

(1)
Includes all other industries, none of which exceeds 2% of total outstandings.

72


Table of Contents

Credit Risk Mitigation

        As part of its overall risk management activities, Citigroup uses credit derivatives and other risk mitigants to hedge portions of the credit risk in its portfolio, in addition to outright asset sales. The purpose of these transactions is to transfer credit risk to third parties. The results of the mark-to-market and any realized gains or losses on credit derivatives are reflected in the Principal transactions line on the Consolidated Statement of Income.

        At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, $49.2 billion and $59.6 billion, respectively, of credit risk exposure were economically hedged. Citigroup's loss model used in the calculation of its loan loss reserve does not include the favorable impact of credit derivatives and other risk mitigants. In addition, the reported amounts of direct outstandings and unfunded commitments in this report do not reflect the impact of these hedging transactions. At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the credit protection was economically hedging underlying credit exposure with the following risk rating distribution, respectively:

Rating of Hedged Exposure

 
 June 30,
2010
 December 31,
2009
 

AAA/AA/A

   48%  45%

BBB

   36   37 

BB/B

   11   11 

CCC or below

   5   7 
      

Total

   100%  100%
      

        At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the credit protection was economically hedging underlying credit exposure with the following industry distribution:

Industry of Hedged Exposure

 
 June 30,
2010
 December 31,
2009
 

Utilities

   6%  9%

Telephone and cable

   7   9 

Agriculture and food preparation

   8   8 

Chemicals

   7   8 

Petroleum

   6   6 

Industrial machinery and equipment

   4   6 

Autos

   7   6 

Retail

   5   4 

Insurance

   4   4 

Other financial institutions

   7   4 

Pharmaceuticals

   4   5 

Natural gas distribution

   4   3 

Metals

   4   4 

Global information technology

   3   3 

Other industries(1)

   24   21 
      

Total

   100%  100%
      

(1)
Includes all other industries, none of which is greater than 2% of the total hedged amount.

73


Table of Contents


MARKET RISK

        Market risk encompasses liquidity risk and price risk, both of which arise in the normal course of business of a global financial intermediary. Liquidity risk is the risk that an entity may be unable to meet a financial commitment to a customer, creditor, or investor when due. Liquidity risk is discussed in "Capital Resources and Liquidity" above. Price risk is the earnings risk from changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, equity and commodity prices, and in their implied volatilities. Price risk arises in non-trading portfolios, as well as in trading portfolios.

Interest Rate Exposure (IRE) for Non-Trading Portfolios

        The exposures in the following table represent the approximate annualized risk to net interest revenue (NIR), assuming an unanticipated parallel instantaneous 100 basis points change, as well as a more gradual 100 basis points (25 basis points per quarter) parallel change in rates compared with the market forward interest rates in selected currencies.

 
 June 30, 2010  March 31, 2010  June 30, 2009  
In millions of dollars Increase  Decrease  Increase  Decrease  Increase  Decrease  

U.S. dollar

                 

Instantaneous change

  $(264) NM  $(488) NM  $(1,191)  NM 

Gradual change

  $(179) NM  $(110) NM  $(694)  NM 
              

Mexican peso

                 

Instantaneous change

  $60  $(60)  $42  (42)  $(21)  21 

Gradual change

  $33  $(33)  $21  (21)  $(15)  15 
              

Euro

                 

Instantaneous change

  $13  NM  $(56) NM  $26  $(25)

Gradual change

  $3  NM  $(50) NM  $(4) $4 
              

Japanese yen

                 

Instantaneous change

  $133  NM  $148  NM  $207   NM 

Gradual change

  $89  NM  $97  NM  $119   NM 
              

Pound sterling

                 

Instantaneous change

  $16  NM  $(3) NM  $(8)  8 

Gradual change

  $8  NM  $(5) NM  $(14)  14 
              

NM    Not meaningful. A 100 basis point decrease in interest rates would imply negative rates for the yield curve.

        The changes in the U.S. dollar IRE from the previous quarter reflect changes in the customer-related asset and liability mix, the expected impact of market rates on customer behavior and Citigroup's view of prevailing interest rates. The changes from the prior-year quarter primarily reflect modeling of mortgages and deposits based on lower rates, pricing changes due to the CARD Act, debt issuance and swapping activities, offset by repositioning of the liquidity portfolio.

        Certain trading-oriented businesses within Citi have accrual-accounted positions. The U.S. dollar IRE associated with these businesses is ($147) million for a 100 basis point instantaneous increase in interest rates.

        The following table shows the risk to NIR from six different changes in the implied-forward rates. Each scenario assumes that the rate change will occur on a gradual basis every three months over the course of one year.

 
 Scenario 1  Scenario 2  Scenario 3  Scenario 4  Scenario 5  Scenario 6  

Overnight rate change (bps)

    100  200  (200) (100)  

10-year rate change (bps)

   (100)   100  (100)   100 
              

Impact to net interest revenue
(in millions of dollars)

 
$

(7

)

$

(86

)

$

(371

)
 
NM
  
NM
 
$

(49

)
              

NM    Not meaningful. A 100 basis point or more decrease in the overnight rate would imply negative rates for the yield curve.

74


Table of Contents

Value at Risk for Trading Portfolios

        For Citigroup's major trading centers, the aggregate pretax value at risk (VAR) in the trading portfolios was $214 million, $172 million, $205 million, and $277 million at June 30, 2010, March 31, 2010, December 31, 2009, and June 30, 2009, respectively. Daily Citigroup trading VAR averaged $188 million and ranged from $163 million to $219 million during the second quarter of 2010.

        The following table summarizes VAR for Citigroup trading portfolios at June 30, 2010, March 31, 2010, and June 30, 2009, including the total VAR, the specific risk-only component of VAR, the isolated general market factor VARs, along with the quarterly averages. On April 30, 2010, Citigroup concluded its implementation of exponentially weighted market factor volatilities for Interest rate and FX positions to the VAR calculation. This methodology uses the higher of short- and long-term annualized volatilities. This enhancement resulted in a 31% increase in S&B VAR, and a 24% increase in Citigroup consolidated VAR, reported at June 30, 2010.

In million of dollars June 30,
2010
 Second
Quarter
2010
Average
 March 31,
2010
 First
Quarter
2010
Average
 June 30,
2009
 Second
Quarter
2009
Average
 

Interest rate

  $244  $224  $201  $193  $226  $217 

Foreign exchange

   57   57   53   51   84   61 

Equity

   71   64   49   73   65   94 

Commodity

   24   21   17   18   36   38 

Diversification benefit

   (182)  (178)  (148)  (135)  (134)  (150)
              

Total—All market risk factors, including general and specific risk

  $214  $188  $172  $200  $277  $260 
              

Specific risk-only component(1)

  $17  $16  $15  $20  $18  $20 
              

Total—General market factors only

  $197  $172  $157  $180  $259  $240 
              

(1)
The specific risk-only component represents the level of equity and debt issuer-specific risk embedded in VAR.

        The table below provides the range of market factor VARs, inclusive of specific risk, across the quarters ended:

 
 June 30,
2010
 March 31,
2010
 June 30,
2009
 
In millions of dollars Low  High  Low  High  Low  High  

Interest rate

  $198  $270  $171  $228  $193  $240 

Foreign exchange

   36   94   37   78   31   91 

Equity

   48   89   47   111   50   153 

Commodity

   15   27   15   20   26   50 
              

        The following table provides the VAR for S&B for the second quarter of 2010 and the first quarter of 2010:

In millions of dollars June 30,
2010
 March 31,
2010
 

Total—All market risk factors, including general and specific risk

  $176  $104 
      

Average—during quarter

   139   144 

High—during quarter

   180   235 

Low—during quarter

   100   99 
      

75


Table of Contents


INTEREST REVENUE/EXPENSE AND YIELDS

Average Rates—Interest Revenue, Interest Expense, and Net Interest Margin

GRAPHIC

In millions of dollars 2nd Qtr.
2010
 1st Qtr.
2010
 2nd Qtr.
2009(1)
 Change
2Q10 vs. 2Q09
 

Interest revenue(2)

  $20,418  $20,852  $19,671   4%

Interest expense(3)

   6,379   6,291   6,842   (7)%
          

Net interest revenue(2)(3)

  $14,039  $14,561   12,829   9%
          

Interest revenue—average rate

   4.57%  4.75%  4.97%  (40) bps

Interest expense—average rate

   1.60%  1.60%  1.93%  (33) bps

Net interest margin

   3.15%  3.32%  3.24%  (9) bps
          

Interest-rate benchmarks:

             

Federal Funds rate—end of period

   0.00-0.25%  0.00-0.25%  0.00-0.25%  

Federal Funds rate—average rate

   0.00-0.25%  0.00-0.25%  0.00-0.25%  
          

Two-year U.S. Treasury note—average rate

   0.87%  0.92%  1.02%  (15) bps

10-year U.S. Treasury note—average rate

   3.49%  3.72%  3.32%  17bps
          

10-year vs. two-year spread

   262bps  280bps  230bps   
          

(1)
Reclassified to conform to the current period's presentation and to exclude discontinued operations.

(2)
Excludes taxable equivalent adjustments (based on the U.S. Federal statutory tax rate of 35%) of $149 million, $135 million, and $82 million for the second quarter of 2010, the first quarter of 2010, and the second quarter of 2009, respectively.

(3)
Excludes expenses associated with hybrid financial instruments and beneficial interest in consolidated VIEs. These obligations are classified as Long-term debt and accounted for at fair value with changes recorded in Principal transactions.

        A significant portion of the Company's business activities are based upon gathering deposits and borrowing money and then lending or investing those funds, including market-making activities in tradable securities. Net interest margin (NIM) is calculated by dividing annualized gross interest revenue less gross interest expense by average interest earning assets.

        NIM decreased by 17 basis points during the second quarter of 2010 due to the continued de-risking of loan portfolios, the expansion of loss mitigation efforts and the Primerica divestiture.

76


Table of Contents


AVERAGE BALANCES AND INTEREST RATES—ASSETS(1)(2)(3)(4)

 
 Average Volume  Interest Revenue  % Average Rate  
In millions of dollars 2nd Qtr.
2010
 1st Qtr.
2010
 2nd Qtr.
2009
 2nd Qtr.
2010
 1st Qtr.
2010
 2nd Qtr.
2009
 2nd Qtr.
2010
 1st Qtr.
2010
 2nd Qtr.
2009
 

Assets

                            

Deposits with banks(5)

  $168,330  $166,378  $168,631  $291  $290  $377   0.69%  0.71%  0.90%
                    

Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell(6)

                            

In U.S. offices

  $186,283  $160,033  $131,522  $452  $471  $515   0.97%  1.19%  1.57%

In offices outside the U.S.(5)

   83,055   78,052   61,382   329   281   279   1.59   1.46   1.82 
                    

Total

  $269,338  $238,085  $192,904  $781  $752  $794   1.16%  1.28%  1.65%
                    

Trading account assets(7)(8)

                            

In U.S. offices

  $130,475  $131,776  $134,334  $1,019  $1,069  $1,785   3.13%  3.29%  5.33%

In offices outside the U.S.(5)

   149,628   152,403   120,468   992   803   1,136   2.66   2.14   3.78 
                    

Total

  $280,103  $284,179  $254,802  $2,011  $1,872  $2,921   2.88%  2.67%  4.60%
                    

Investments(1)

                            

In U.S. offices

                            
 

Taxable

  $157,621  $150,858  $123,181  $1,301  $1,389  $1,674   3.31%  3.73%  5.45%
 

Exempt from U.S. income tax

   15,305   15,570   16,293   197   173   247   5.16   4.51   6.08 

In offices outside the U.S.(5)

   138,477   144,892   118,891   1,488   1,547   1,514   4.31   4.33   5.11 
                    

Total

  $311,403  $311,320  $258,365  $2,986  $3,109  $3,435   3.85%  4.05%  5.33%
                    

Loans (net of unearned income)(9)

                            

In U.S. offices

  $460,147  $479,384  $385,347  $9,153  $9,511  $6,254   7.98%  8.05%  6.51%

In offices outside the U.S.(5)

   249,353   254,488   270,594   5,074   5,162   5,675   8.16   8.23   8.41 
                    

Total

  $709,500  $733,872  $655,941  $14,227  $14,673  $11,929   8.04%  8.11%  7.29%
                    

Other interest-earning Assets

  $51,519  $45,894  $57,416  $122  $156  $215   0.95%  1.38%  1.50%
                    

Total interest-earning Assets

  $1,790,193  $1,779,728  $1,588,059  $20,418  $20,852  $19,671   4.57%  4.75%  4.97%
                       

Non-interest-earning assets(7)

   226,902   233,344   262,840                   
                          

Total Assets from discontinued operations

      $19,048                   
                          

Total assets

  $2,017,095  $2,013,072  $1,869,947                   
                    

(1)
Interest revenue excludes the taxable equivalent adjustments (based on the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 35%) of $149 million, $135 million, and $82 million for the second quarter of 2010, the first quarter of 2010, and the second quarter of 2009, respectively.

(2)
Interest rates and amounts include the effects of risk management activities associated with the respective asset and liability categories.

(3)
Monthly or quarterly averages have been used by certain subsidiaries where daily averages are unavailable.

(4)
Detailed average volume, interest revenue and interest expense exclude discontinued operations.

(5)
Average rates reflect prevailing local interest rates, including inflationary effects and monetary correction in certain countries.

(6)
Average volumes of securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell are reported net pursuant to (ASC 210-20-45) FIN 41 and Interest revenue excludes the impact of (ASC 210-20-45) FIN 41.

(7)
The fair value carrying amounts of derivative and foreign exchange contracts are reported in non-interest-earning assets and other non-interest-bearing liabilities.

(8)
Interest expense on Trading account liabilities of ICG is reported as a reduction of Interest revenue. Interest revenue and Interest expense on cash collateral positions are reported in Trading account assets andTrading account liabilities, respectively.

(9)
Includes cash-basis loans.

Reclassified to conform to the current period's presentation.

77


Table of Contents


AVERAGE BALANCES AND INTEREST RATES—LIABILITIES AND EQUITY, AND NET INTEREST REVENUE(1)(2)(3)(4)

 
 Average Volume  Interest Expense  % Average Rate  
In millions of dollars 2nd Qtr.
2010
 1st Qtr.
2010
 2nd Qtr.
2009
 2nd Qtr.
2010
 1st Qtr.
2010
 2nd Qtr.
2009
 2nd Qtr.
2010
 1st Qtr.
2010
 2nd Qtr.
2009
 

Liabilities

                            

Deposits

                            

In U. S. offices

                            
 

Savings deposits(5)

  $186,070  $178,266  $173,168  $461  $458  $999   0.99%  1.04%  2.31%
 

Other time deposits

   48,171   54,391   57,869   100   143   278   0.83   1.07   1.93 

In offices outside the U.S.(6)

   475,562   481,002   428,188   1,475   1,479   1,563   1.24   1.25   1.46 
                    

Total

  $709,803  $713,659  $659,225  $2,036  $2,080  $2,840   1.15%  1.18%  1.73%
                    

Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase(7)

                            

In U.S. offices

  $137,610  $120,695  $133,948  $237  $179  $288   0.69%  0.60%  0.86%

In offices outside the U.S.(6)

   100,759   79,447   74,346   560   475   643   2.23   2.42   3.47 
                    

Total

  $238,369  $200,142  $208,294  $797  $654  $931   1.34%  1.33%  1.79%
                    

Trading account liabilities(8)(9)

                            

In U.S. offices

  $39,709  $32,642  $19,592  $88  $44  $50   0.89%  0.55%  1.02%

In offices outside the U.S.(6)

   43,528   46,905   36,652   18   19   19   0.17   0.16   0.21 
                    

Total

  $83,237  $79,547  $56,244  $106  $63  $69   0.51%  0.32%  0.49%
                    

Short-term borrowings

                            

In U.S. offices

  $122,260  $152,785  $136,200  $181  $204  $209   0.59%  0.54%  0.62%

In offices outside the U.S.(6)

   33,630   27,659   35,299   34   72   106   0.41   1.06   1.20 
                    

Total

  $155,890  $180,444  $171,499  $215  $276  $315   0.55%  0.62%  0.74%
                    

Long-term debt(10)

                            

In U.S. offices

  $391,524  $397,113  $296,324  $3,011  $3,005  $2,427   3.08%  3.07%  3.29%

In offices outside the U.S.(6)

   23,369   25,955   29,318   214   213   260   3.67   3.33   3.56 
                    

Total

  $414,893  $423,068  $325,642  $3,225  $3,218  $2,687   3.12%  3.08%  3.31%
                    

Total interest-bearing liabilities

  $1,602,192  $1,596,860  $1,420,904  $6,379  $6,291  $6,842   1.60%  1.60%  1.93%
                       

Demand deposits in U.S. offices

   14,986   16,675   19,584                   

Other non-interest-bearing liabilities(8)

   243,892   247,365   267,055                   

Total liabilities from discontinued operations

       12,122                   
                          

Total liabilities

  $1,861,070  $1,860,900  $1,719,665                   
                          

Citigroup equity(11)

  $153,798  $149,993  $148,448                   
                          

Noncontrolling Interest

  $2,227  $2,179   1,834                   
                          

Total Equity

  $156,025  $152,172  $150,282                   
                          

Total Liabilities and Equity

  $2,017,095  $2,013,072  $1,869,947                   
                    

Net interest revenue as a percentage of average interest-earning assets(12)

                            

In U.S. offices

   1,087,675  $1,080,673  $944,819   8,136  $8,660  $6,452   3.00%  3.25%  2.74%

In offices outside the U.S.(6)

   702,518   699,055   643,240   5,903   5,901   6,377   3.37%  3.42   3.98 
                    

Total

  $1,790,193  $1,779,728  $1,588,059  $14,039  $14,561  $12,829   3.15%  3.32%  3.24%
                    

(1)
Interest revenue excludes the taxable equivalent adjustments (based on the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 35%) of $149 million, $135 million, and $82 million for the second quarter of 2010, the first quarter of 2010, and the second quarter of 2009, respectively.

(2)
Interest rates and amounts include the effects of risk management activities associated with the respective asset and liability categories.

(3)
Monthly or quarterly averages have been used by certain subsidiaries where daily averages are unavailable.

(4)
Detailed average volume, interest revenue and interest expense exclude discontinued operations.

(5)
Savings deposits consist of Insured Money Market Rate accounts, NOW accounts, and other savings deposits. The interest expense includes FDIC deposit fees and charges of $242 million, $223 million and $670 million for three months ended June 30, 2010, March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2009, respectively. Additionally, the second quarter of 2009 includes the one-time FDIC special assessment of $333 million.

(6)
Average rates reflect prevailing local interest rates, including inflationary effects and monetary corrections in certain countries.

(7)
Average volumes of securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase are reported net pursuant to (ASC 210-20-45) FIN 41and Interest expense excludes the impact of (ASC 210-20-45) FIN 41.

(8)
The fair value carrying amounts of derivative and foreign exchange contracts are reported in non-interest-earning assets and other non-interest-bearing liabilities.

(9)
Interest expense on Trading account liabilities of ICG is reported as a reduction of Interest revenue. Interest revenue and Interest expense on cash collateral positions are reported in Trading account assets andTrading account liabilities, respectively.

(10)
Excludes hybrid financial instruments and beneficial interests in consolidated VIEs that are classified as Long-term debt as these obligations are accounted for at fair value with changes recorded in Principal Transactions.

(11)
Includes stockholders' equity from discontinued operations.

(12)
Includes allocations for capital and funding costs based on the location of the asset.

Reclassified to conform to the current period's presentation.

78


Table of Contents


AVERAGE BALANCES AND INTEREST RATES—ASSETS(1)(2)(3)(4)

 
 Average Volume  Interest Revenue  % Average Rate  
In millions of dollars Six Months
2010
 Six Months
2009
 Six Months
2010
 Six Months
2009
 Six Months
2010
 Six Months
2009
 

Assets

                   

Deposits with banks(5)

  $167,354  $168,887  $581  $813   0.70%  0.97%
              

Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell(6)

                   

In U.S. offices

  $173,158  $129,763  $923  $1,065   1.07%  1.66%

In offices outside the U.S.(5)

   80,554   56,907   610   614   1.53   2.18 
              

Total

  $253,712  $186,670  $1,533  $1,679   1.22%  1.81%
              

Trading account assets(7)(8)

                   

In U.S. offices

  $131,126  $140,925  $2,088  $3,769   3.21%  5.39%

In offices outside the U.S.(5)

   151,015   114,460   1,795   2,103   2.40   3.71 
              

Total

  $282,141  $255,385  $3,883  $5,872   2.78%  4.64%
              

Investments(1)

                   

In U.S. offices

                   
 

Taxable

  $154,239  $122,541  $2,690  $3,154   3.52%  5.19%
 

Exempt from U.S. income tax

   15,438   15,434   370   365   4.83   4.77 

In offices outside the U.S.(5)

   141,685   112,921   3,035   3,092   4.32   5.52 
              

Total

  $311,362  $250,896  $6,095  $6,611   3.95%  5.31%
              

Loans (net of unearned income)(9)

                   

In U.S. offices

  $469,765  $394,408  $18,663  $13,085   8.01%  6.69%

In offices outside the U.S.(5)

   251,921   269,421   10,237   11,699   8.19   8.76 
              

Total

  $721,686  $663,829  $28,900  $24,784   8.08%  7.53%
              

Other interest-earning assets

  $48,707  $54,524  $278  $495   1.15%  1.83%
              

Total interest-earning assets

  $1,784,962  $1,580,191  $41,270  $40,254   4.66%  5.14%
                

Non-interest-earning assets(7)

   230,122   289,207             

Total assets from discontinued operations

     19,566             
                  

Total assets

  $2,015,084  $1,888,964             
              

(1)
Interest revenue excludes the taxable equivalent adjustments (based on the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 35%) of $284 million and $179 million for the first six months of 2010 and 2009, respectively.

(2)
Interest rates and amounts include the effects of risk management activities associated with the respective asset and liability categories.

(3)
Monthly or quarterly averages have been used by certain subsidiaries where daily averages are unavailable.

(4)
Detailed average volume, interest revenue and interest expense exclude discontinued operations.

(5)
Average rates reflect prevailing local interest rates, including inflationary effects and monetary correction in certain countries.

(6)
Average volumes of securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell are reported net pursuant to (ASC 210-20-45) FIN 41 and interest revenue excludes the impact of (ASC 210-20-45) FIN 41.

(7)
The fair value carrying amounts of derivative and foreign exchange contracts are reported in non-interest-earning assets and other non-interest bearing liabilities.

(8)
Interest expense on Trading account liabilities of ICG is reported as a reduction of Interest revenue. Interest revenue and interest expense on cash collateral positions are reported in Trading account assets andTrading account liabilities, respectively.

(9)
Includes cash-basis loans.

Reclassified to conform to the current period's presentation.

79


Table of Contents


AVERAGE BALANCES AND INTEREST RATES—LIABILITIES AND EQUITY, AND NET INTEREST REVENUE(1)(2)(3)(4)

 
 Average Volume  Interest Expense  % Average Rate  
In millions of dollars Six Months
2010
 Six Months
2009
 Six Months
2010
 Six Months
2009
 Six Months
2010
 Six Months
2009
 

Liabilities

                   

Deposits

                   

In U. S. offices

                   
 

Savings deposits(5)

  $182,168  $169,073  $919  $1,632   1.02%  1.95%
 

Other time deposits

   51,281   59,576   243   694   0.96   2.35 

In offices outside the U.S.(6)

   478,282   418,514   2,954   3,362   1.25   1.62 
              

Total

  $711,731  $647,163  $4,116  $5,688   1.17%  1.77%
              

Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase(7)

                   

In U.S. offices

  $129,153  $143,102  $416  $604   0.65%  0.85%

In offices outside the U.S.(6)

   90,103   71,265   1,035   1,431   2.32   4.05 
              

Total

  $219,256  $214,367  $1,451  $2,035   1.33%  1.91%
              

Trading account liabilities(8)(9)

                   

In U.S. offices

  $36,176  $20,152  $132  $143   0.74%  1.43%

In offices outside the U.S.(6)

   45,216   33,877   37   34   0.17   0.20 
              

Total

  $81,392  $54,029  $169  $177   0.42%  0.66%
              

Short-term borrowings

                   

In U.S. offices

  $137,522  $142,437  $385  $576   0.56%  0.82%

In offices outside the U.S.(6)

   30,645   35,257   106   202   0.70   1.16 
              

Total

  $168,167  $177,694  $491  $778   0.59%  0.88%
              

Long-term debt(10)

                   

In U.S. offices

  $394,318  $302,997  $6,016  $5,247   3.08%  3.49%

In offices outside the U.S.(6)

   24,662   31,688   427   574   3.49   3.65 
              

Total

  $418,980  $334,685   6,443  $5,821   3.10%  3.51%
              

Total interest-bearing liabilities

  $1,599,526  $1,427,938   12,670  $14,499   1.60%  2.05%
                

Demand deposits in U.S. offices

   15,831   17,486             

Other non-interest bearing liabilities(8)

   245,629   283,835             

Total liabilities from discontinued operations

     11,910             
                  

Total liabilities

  $1,860,986  $1,741,169             
                  

Total Citigroup equity(11)

  $151,895  $145,873             

Noncontrolling interest

   2,203   1,922             
                  

Total Equity

  $154,098  $147,795             
                  

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity

  $2,015,084  $1,888,964             
              

Net interest revenue as a percentage of average interest-earning assets(12)

                   

In U.S. offices

  $1,084,175  $957,624  $16,796  $13,095   3.12%  2.76%

In offices outside the U.S.(6)

   700,787   622,567   11,804   12,660   3.40%  4.10 
              

Total

  $1,784,962  $1,580,191  $28,600  $25,755   3.23%  3.29%
              

(1)
Interest revenue excludes the taxable equivalent adjustments (based on the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 35%) of $284 million and $179 million for the first six months of 2010 and 2009, respectively.

(2)
Interest rates and amounts include the effects of risk management activities associated with the respective asset and liability categories.

(3)
Monthly or quarterly averages have been used by certain subsidiaries where daily averages are unavailable.

(4)
Detailed average volume, interest revenue and interest expense exclude discontinued operations.

(5)
Savings deposits consist of Insured Money Market Rate accounts, NOW accounts, and other savings deposits. The interest expense includes FDIC deposit fees and charges of $465 million and $969 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009, respectively. Additionally, the second quarter of 2009 includes the one-time FDIC special assessment of $333 million.

(6)
Average rates reflect prevailing local interest rates, including inflationary effects and monetary corrections in certain countries.

(7)
Average volumes of securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase are reported net pursuant to (ASC 210-20-45) FIN 41 and interest expense excludes the impact of (ASC 210-20-45) FIN 41.

(8)
The fair value carrying amounts of derivative and foreign exchange contracts are reported in non-interest-earning assets and other non-interest bearing liabilities.

(9)
Interest expense on Trading account liabilities of ICG is reported as a reduction of Interest revenue. Interest revenue and interest expense on cash collateral positions are reported in Trading account assets andTrading account liabilities, respectively.

(10)
Excludes hybrid financial instruments and beneficial interests in consolidated VIEs that are classified as Long-term debt as these obligations are accounted for at fair value with changes recorded in Principal Transactions. In addition, the majority of the funding provided by Corporate Treasury to CitiCapital is excluded from this line.

(11)
Includes stockholders' equity from discontinued operations.

(12)
Includes allocations for capital and funding costs based on the location of the asset.

Reclassified to conform to the current period's presentation.

80


Table of Contents


ANALYSIS OF CHANGES IN INTEREST REVENUE(1)(2)(3)

 
 2nd Qtr. 2010 vs. 1st Qtr. 2010  2nd Qtr. 2010 vs. 2nd Qtr. 2009  
 
 Increase (Decrease)
Due to Change in:
  
 Increase (Decrease)
Due to Change in:
  
 
In millions of dollars  Average
Volume
 Average
Rate
 Net
Change
 Average
Volume
 Average
Rate
 Net
Change
 

Deposits with banks(4)

  $3  $(2) $1  $(1) $(85) $(86)
              

Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell

                   

In U.S. offices

  $71  $(90) $(19) $172  $(235) $(63)

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

   19   29   48   89   (39)  50 
              

Total

  $90  $(61) $29  $261  $(274) $(13)
              

Trading account assets(5)

                   

In U.S. offices

  $(10) $(40) $(50) $(50) $(716) $(766)

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

   (15)  204   189   238   (382)  (144)
              

Total

  $(25) $164  $139  $188  $(1,098) $(910)
              

Investments(1)

                   

In U.S. offices

  $59  $(123) $(64) $394  $(817) $(423)

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

   (69)  10   (59)  229   (255)  (26)
              

Total

  $(10) $(113) $(123) $623  $(1,072) $(449)
              

Loans (net of unearned income)(6)

                   

In U.S. offices

  $(383) $25  $(358) $1,341  $1,558  $2,899 

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

   (104)  16   (88)  (436)  (165)  (601)
              

Total

  $(487) $41  $(446)  905  $1,393  $2,298 
              

Other interest-earning assets

  $17  $(51) $(34) $(20) $(73) $(93)
              

Total interest revenue

  $(412) $(22) $(434) $1,956  $(1,209) $747 
              

(1)
The taxable equivalent adjustment is based on the U.S. Federal statutory tax rate of 35% and is excluded from this presentation.

(2)
Rate/volume variance is allocated based on the percentage relationship of changes in volume and changes in rate to the total net change.

(3)
Detailed average volume, interest revenue and interest expense exclude discontinued operations.

(4)
Changes in average rates reflect changes in prevailing local interest rates, including inflationary effects and monetary corrections in certain countries.

(5)
Interest expense on Trading account liabilities of ICG is reported as a reduction of Interest revenue. Interest revenue and Interest expense on cash collateral positions are reported in Trading account assets andTrading account liabilities, respectively.

(6)
Includes cash-basis loans.

81


Table of Contents


ANALYSIS OF CHANGES IN INTEREST EXPENSE AND NET INTEREST REVENUE(1)(2)(3)

 
 2nd Qtr. 2010 vs. 1st Qtr. 2010  2nd Qtr. 2010 vs. 2nd Qtr. 2009  
 
 Increase (Decrease)
Due to Change in:
  
 Increase (Decrease)
Due to Change in:
  
 
In millions of dollars  Average
Volume
 Average
Rate
 Net
Change
 Average
Volume
 Average
Rate
 Net
Change
 

Deposits

                   

In U.S. offices

  $4  $(44) $(40) $17  $(733)  (716)

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

   (17)  13   (4)  162   (250)  (88)
              

Total

  $(13) $(31) $(44) $179  $(983)  (804)
              

Federal funds purchased and
securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase

                   

In U.S. offices

  $27  $31  $58  $8  $(59)  (51)

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

   120   (35)  85   188   (271)  (83)
              

Total

  $147  $(4) $143  $196  $(330)  (134)
              

Trading account liabilities(5)

                   

In U.S. offices

  $11  $33  $44  $45  $(7)  38 

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

   (1)    (1)  3   (4)  (1)
              

Total

  $10  $33  $43  $48  $(11)  37 
              

Short-term borrowings

                   

In U.S. offices

  $(44) $21  $(23) $(21) $(7)  (28)

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

   13   (51)  (38)  (5)  (67)  (72)
              

Total

  $(31) $(30) $(61) $(26) $(74)  (100)
              

Long-term debt

                   

In U.S. offices

  $(43) $49  $6  $740  $(156)  584 

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

   (22)  23   1   (54)  8   (46)
              

Total

  $(65) $72  $7  $686  $(148)  538 
              

Total interest expense

  $48  $40  $88  $1,083  $(1,546)  (463)
              

Net interest revenue

  $(460) $(62) $(522) $873  $337   1,210 
              

(1)
The taxable equivalent adjustment is based on the U.S. Federal statutory tax rate of 35% and is excluded from this presentation.

(2)
Rate/volume variance is allocated based on the percentage relationship of changes in volume and changes in rate to the total net change.

(3)
Detailed average volume, interest revenue and interest expense exclude discontinued operations.

(4)
Changes in average rates reflect changes in prevailing local interest rates, including inflationary effects and monetary corrections in certain countries.

(5)
Interest expense on Trading account liabilities of ICG is reported as a reduction of Interest revenue. Interest revenue and Interest expense on cash collateral positions are reported in Trading account assets andTrading account liabilities, respectively.

82


Table of Contents

ANALYSIS OF CHANGES IN INTEREST REVENUE, INTEREST EXPENSE, AND NET INTEREST REVENUE(1)(2)(3)

 
 Six Months 2010 vs. Six Months 2009  
 
 Increase (Decrease)
Due to Change in:
  
 
In millions of dollars Average
Volume
 Average
Rate
 Net
Change(2)
 

Deposits at interest with banks(4)

  $(7) $(225) $(232)
        

Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell

          

In U.S. offices

  $295  $(437) $(142)

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

   211   (215)  (4)
        

Total

  $506  $(652) $(146)
        

Trading account assets(5)

          

In U.S. offices

  $(247) $(1,434) $(1,681)

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

   559   (867)  (308)
        

Total

  $312  $(2,301) $(1,989)
        

Investments(1)

          

In U.S. offices

  $704  $(1,163) $(459)

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

   695   (752)  (57)
        

Total

  $1,399  $(1,915) $(516)
        

Loans (net of unearned income)(6)

          

In U.S. offices

  $2,743  $2,836  $5,579 

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

   (735)  (727)  (1,462)
        

Total

  $2,008  $2,109  $4,117 
        

Other interest-earning assets

  $(48) $(169) $(217)
        

Total interest revenue

  $4,170  $(3,153) $1,017 
        

Deposits

          

In U.S. offices

  $48  $(1,212) $(1,164)

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

   438   (846)  (408)
        

Total

  $486  $(2,058) $(1,572)
        

Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase

          

In U.S. offices

  $(55) $(133) $(188)

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

   317   (712)  (395)
        

Total

  $262  $(845) $(583)
        

Trading account liabilities(5)

          

In U.S. offices

  $79  $(90) $(11)

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

   10   (7)  3 
        

Total

  $89  $(97) $(8)
        

Short-term borrowings

          

In U.S. offices

  $(19) $(172) $(191)

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

   (24)  (72)  (96)
        

Total

  $(43) $(244) $(287)
        

Long-term debt

          

In U.S. offices

  $1,447  $(678) $769 

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

   (123)  (24)  (147)
        

Total

  $1,324  $(702) $622 
        

Total interest expense

  $2,118  $(3,946) $(1,828)
        

Net interest revenue

  $2,052  $793  $2,845 
        

(1)
The taxable equivalent adjustment is based on the U.S. Federal statutory tax rate of 35% and is excluded from this presentation.

(2)
Rate/volume variance is allocated based on the percentage relationship of changes in volume and changes in rate to the total net change.

(3)
Detailed average volume, interest revenue and interest expense exclude discontinued operations.

(4)
Changes in average rates reflect changes in prevailing local interest rates, including inflationary effects and monetary corrections in certain countries.

(5)
Interest expense on Trading account liabilities of ICG is reported as a reduction of Interest revenue. Interest revenue and Interest expense on cash collateral positions are reported in Trading account assets andTrading account liabilities, respectively.

(6)
Includes cash-basis loans.

83


Table of Contents


CROSS BORDER RISK

        The table below shows all countries where total Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC) cross-border outstandings exceed 0.75% of total Citigroup assets:

 
 Cross-Border Claims on Third Parties  June 30, 2010  December 31, 2009  
In billions of U.S.
dollars
 Banks  Public  Private  Total  Trading and
Short-Term
Claims
 Investments
in and
Funding of
Local
Franchises
 Total
Cross-Border
Outstandings
 Commitments  Total
Cross-Border
Outstandings
 Commitments  

France

  $10.8  $11.3  $12.1  $34.2  $26.0  $2.6  $36.8  $62.4  $33.0  $68.5 

Germany

   13.7   6.5   6.1   26.3   21.9   6.8   33.1   62.8   30.2   53.1 

India

   1.8   0.4   6.2   8.4   6.0   17.1   25.5   1.9   24.9   1.8 

Cayman Islands

   0.3   0.7   20.6   21.6   20.9     21.6   4.7   18.0   6.1 

United Kingdom

   10.9   1.0   8.0   19.9   17.8     19.9   142.5   17.1   138.5 

South Korea

   1.7   0.4   2.9   5.0   4.8   11.4   16.4   15.1   17.4   14.4 

Mexico

   2.0   1.2   3.7   6.9   4.4   8.4   15.3   21.7   12.8   21.2 

Netherlands

   4.6   2.7   8.0   15.3   9.7     15.3   45.2   20.3   65.5 

Italy

   1.1   9.4   2.4   12.9   11.2   0.9   13.8   16.4   21.7   21.2 

Venezuelan Operations

        In 2003, the Venezuelan government enacted currency restrictions that have restricted Citigroup's ability to obtain U.S. dollars in Venezuela at the official foreign currency rate. In May 2010, the government enacted new laws that have closed the parallel foreign exchange market and established a new foreign exchange market. Citigroup does not have access to U.S. dollars in this new market. Citigroup uses the official rate to re-measure the foreign currency transactions in the financial statements of its Venezuelan operations, which have U.S. dollar functional currencies, into U.S. dollars. At June 30, 2010, Citigroup had net monetary assets in its Venezuelan operations denominated in bolivars of approximately $200 million.

84


Table of Contents


DERIVATIVES

        See Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion and disclosures related to Citigroup's derivative activities. The following discussions relate to the Fair Valuation Adjustments for Derivatives and Credit Derivatives activities.

Fair Valuation Adjustments for Derivatives

        The table below summarizes the CVA applied to the fair value of derivative instruments as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.

 
 Credit valuation adjustment
Contra-liability (contra-asset)
 
In millions of dollars  June 30, 2010  December 31, 2009  

Non-monoline counterparties

  $(3,618) $(3010)

Citigroup (own)

   1,567   1,401 
      

Net non-monoline CVA

  $(2,051) $(1,609)

Monoline counterparties(1)

   (1,637)  (5,580)
      

Total CVA—derivative instruments

  $(3,688) $(7,189)

(1)
The reduction in CVA on derivative instruments with monoline counterparties includes $3.5 billion of utilizations/releases in the second quarter of 2010.

        The table below summarizes pretax gains (losses) related to changes in credit valuation adjustments on derivative instruments, net of hedges:

 
 Credit valuation
adjustment gain (loss)
 
In millions of dollars  Second Quarter
2010
 Second Quarter
2009(1)
 Six months
ended June 30,
2010
 Six months
ended June 30,
2009(1)
 

CVA on derivatives, excluding monolines

  $(247) $734  $67  $3,215 

CVA related to monoline counterparties

   35   157   433   (933)
          

Total CVA—derivative instruments

  $(212) $891  $500  $2,282 
          

(1)
Reclassified to conform to the current period's presentation.

        The CVA amounts shown above relate solely to the derivative portfolio, and do not include:

    Own-credit adjustments for non-derivative liabilities measured at fair value under the fair value option. See Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.

    The effect of counterparty credit risk embedded in non-derivative instruments. Losses on non-derivative instruments, such as bonds and loans, related to counterparty credit risk are not included in the table above.

Credit Derivatives

        Citigroup makes markets in and trades a range of credit derivatives, both on behalf of clients as well as for its own account. Through these contracts Citigroup either purchases or writes protection on either a single-name or portfolio basis. Citi primarily uses credit derivatives to help mitigate credit risk in its corporate loan portfolio and other cash positions, and to facilitate client transactions.

        Credit derivatives generally require that the seller of credit protection make payments to the buyer upon the occurrence of predefined events (settlement triggers). These settlement triggers, which are defined by the form of the derivative and the referenced credit, are generally limited to the market standard of failure to pay on indebtedness and bankruptcy (or comparable events) of the reference credit and, in a more limited range of transactions, debt restructuring.

        Credit derivative transactions referring to emerging market reference credits will also typically include additional settlement triggers to cover the acceleration of indebtedness and the risk of repudiation or a payment moratorium. In certain transactions on a portfolio of referenced credits or asset-backed securities, the seller of protection may not be required to make payment until a specified amount of losses has occurred with respect to the portfolio and/or may only be required to pay for losses up to a specified amount.

85


Table of Contents

        The following tables summarize the key characteristics of Citi's credit derivatives portfolio by counterparty and derivative form as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:

June 30, 2010:

 
 Fair values  Notionals  
In millions of dollars Receivable  Payable  Beneficiary  Guarantor  

By industry/counterparty

             

Bank

  $50,506  $47,514  $830,163  $772,889 

Broker-dealer

   20,231   20,702   312,437   298,884 

Monoline

   2,047     4,395   

Non-financial

   300   120   1,448   368 

Insurance and other financial institutions

   12,370   9,331   142,036   109,183 
          

Total by industry/counterparty

  $85,454  $77,667  $1,290,479  $1,181,324 
          

By instrument

             

Credit default swaps and options

  $84,597  $76,620  $1,267,276  $1,180,087 

Total return swaps and other

   857   1,047   23,203   1,237 
          

Total by instrument

  $85,454  $77,667  $1,290,479  $1,181,324 
          

By rating:

             

Investment grade

  $25,005  $19,772  $595,049  $526,043 

Non-investment grade(1)

   60,449   57,895   695,430   655,281 
          

Total by Rating

  $85,454  $77,667  $1,290,479  $1,181,324 
          

By maturity:

             

Within 1 year

  $2,169  $1,995  $142,787  $137,914 

From 1 to 5 years

   51,222   44,993   917,276   832,146 

After 5 years

   32,063   30,679   230,416   211,264 
          

Total by maturity

  $85,454  $77,667  $1,290,479  $1,181,324 
          

December 31, 2009:

 
 Fair values  Notionals  
In millions of dollars Receivable  Payable  Beneficiary  Guarantor  

By industry/counterparty

             

Bank

 $52,383 $50,778 $872,523 $807,484 

Broker-dealer

  23,241  22,932  338,829  340,949 

Monoline

  5,860    10,018  33 

Non-financial

  339  371  1,781  623 

Insurance and other financial institutions

  10,969  8,343  109,811  64,964 
          

Total by industry/counterparty

 $92,792 $82,424 $1,332,962 $1,214,053 
          

By instrument

             

Credit default swaps and options

 $91,625 $81,174 $1,305,724 $1,213,208 

Total return swaps and other

  1,167  1,250  27,238  845 
          

Total by instrument

 $92,792 $82,424 $1,332,962 $1,214,053 
          

By rating:

             

Investment grade

 $26,666 $22,469 $656,876 $576,930 

Non-investment grade(1)

  66,126  59,995  676,086  637,123 
          

Total by Rating

 $92,792 $82,424 $1,332,962 $1,214,053 
          

By maturity:

             

Within 1 year

 $2,167 $2,067 $173,880 $165,056 

From 1 to 5 years

  54,079  47,350  877,573  806,143 

After 5 years

  36,546  33,007  281,509  242,854 
          

Total by maturity

 $92,792 $82,424 $1,332,962 $1,214,053 
          

(1)
Also includes not rated credit derivative instruments.

86


Table of Contents

        The fair values shown are prior to the application of any netting agreements, cash collateral, and market or credit value adjustments.

        Citigroup actively participates in trading a variety of credit derivatives products as both an active two-way market-maker for clients and to manage credit risk. The majority of this activity was transacted with other financial intermediaries, including both banks and broker-dealers. Citigroup generally has a mismatch between the total notional amounts of protection purchased and sold and it may hold the reference assets directly, rather than entering into offsetting credit derivative contracts as and when desired. The open risk exposures from credit derivative contracts are largely matched after certain cash positions in reference assets are considered and after notional amounts are adjusted, either to a duration-based equivalent basis or to reflect the level of subordination in tranched structures.

        Citi actively monitors its counterparty credit risk in credit derivative contracts. Approximately 91% and 85% of the gross receivables are from counterparties with which Citi maintains collateral agreements as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. A majority of Citi's top 15 counterparties (by receivable balance owed to the company) are banks, financial institutions or other dealers. Contracts with these counterparties do not include ratings-based termination events. However, counterparty ratings downgrades may have an incremental effect by lowering the threshold at which Citigroup may call for additional collateral. A number of the remaining significant counterparties are monolines (which have CVA as shown above).


INCOME TAXES

Deferred Tax Assets (DTA)

        Deferred taxes are recorded for the future consequences of events that have been recognized in the financial statements or tax returns, based upon enacted tax laws and rates. DTAs are recognized subject to management's judgment that realization is more likely than not.

        As of June 30, 2010, Citigroup had recognized net DTAs of approximately $49.9 billion, a decrease of $0.3 billion from $50.2 billion at March 31, 2010.

        Although realization is not assured, Citi believes that the realization of the recognized net deferred tax asset of $49.9 billion at June 30, 2010 is more likely than not based on expectations as to future taxable income in the jurisdictions in which the DTAs arise and, based on available tax planning strategies as defined in ASC 740, Income Taxes, that could be implemented if necessary to prevent a carryforward from expiring.

        Approximately $19 billion of Citigroup's DTAs is represented by U.S. federal, foreign, state and local tax return carry-forwards subject to expiration substantially beginning in 2017 and continuing through 2029. Included in Citi's overall net DTAs of $49.9 billion is $31 billion of future tax deductions and credits that arose largely due to timing differences between the recognition of income for GAAP and tax purposes and represent net deductions and credits that have not yet been taken on a tax return. The most significant source of these timing differences is the loan loss reserve build, which accounts for approximately $19 billion of the net DTAs. In general, Citi would need to recognize approximately $99 billion of taxable income, primarily in U.S. taxable jurisdictions, during the respective carryforward periods to fully realize its U.S. federal, state and local DTAs.

        Citi's ability to utilize its DTAs to offset future taxable income may be significantly limited if Citi experiences an "ownership change," as defined in Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"). In general, an ownership change will occur if there is a cumulative change in Citi's ownership by "5% shareholders" (as defined in the Code) that exceeds 50 percentage points over a rolling three-year period. A corporation that experiences an ownership change will generally be subject to an annual limitation on its pre-ownership change DTAs equal to the value of the corporation immediately before the ownership change, multiplied by the long-term tax-exempt rate (subject to certain adjustments); provided that the annual limitation would be increased each year to the extent that there is an unused limitation in a prior year. The limitation arising from an ownership change under Section 382 on Citigroup's ability to utilize its DTAs will depend on the value of Citigroup's stock at the time of the ownership change.

        Under IRS Notice 2010-2, Citigroup will not experience an ownership change within the meaning of Section 382 as a result of the sales of its common stock held by the U.S. Treasury.

        Approximately $15 billion of the net deferred tax asset is included in Tier 1 and Tier 1 Common regulatory capital.

        Included in the tax provision for the second quarter of 2010 was a release of $72 million in respect of the conclusion of the IRS audit of Citigroup's U.S. Federal consolidated income tax returns for the years 2003-2005.

87


Table of Contents


RECLASSIFICATION OF HELD-TO-MATURITY (HTM) SECURITIES TO AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE (AFS)

        In March 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-11, Scope Exception Related to Embedded Credit Derivatives. The ASU clarifies that certain embedded derivatives, such as those contained in certain securitizations, CDOs and structured notes, should be considered embedded credit derivatives subject to potential bifurcation and separate fair value accounting. The ASU allows any beneficial interest issued by a securitization vehicle to be accounted for under the fair value option at transition on July 1, 2010.

        The Company elected to account for beneficial interests issued by securitization vehicles, with a total fair value of $11.8 billion, under the fair value option on July 1, 2010. Beneficial interests previously classified as held-to-maturity (HTM) were reclassified to available-for-sale (AFS) on June 30, 2010, because as of that reporting date, the Company did not have the intent to hold the beneficial interests until maturity.

        All reclassified debt securities with gross unrealized losses were assessed for other-than-temporary impairment as of June 30, 2010, including an assessment of whether the Company intends to sell the security. For securities that the Company intends to sell, impairment charges of $176 million (pretax) were recorded in earnings in the second quarter of 2010.

        On July 1, 2010, the Company recorded a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings for reclassified beneficial interests, consisting of gross unrealized losses recognized in Accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) of $401 million and gross unrealized gains recognized in AOCI of $355 million, for a net charge to Retained earnings of $46 million.

        See Notes 1and 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for details of this reclassification.


CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

        See Citi's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, and Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q , for a discussion of contractual obligations.


CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure

        Citigroup's disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms, including without limitation that information required to be disclosed by Citi in its SEC filings is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

        Citigroup's Disclosure Committee assists the CEO and CFO in their responsibilities to design, establish, maintain and evaluate the effectiveness of Citi's disclosure controls and procedures. The Disclosure Committee is responsible for, among other things, the oversight, maintenance and implementation of the disclosure controls and procedures, subject to the supervision and oversight of the CEO and CFO.

        Citigroup's management, with the participation of the company's CEO and CFO, has evaluated the effectiveness of Citigroup's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of June 30, 2010 and, based on that evaluation, the CEO and CFO have concluded that at that date Citigroup's disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Financial Reporting

        There were no changes in Citigroup's internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2010 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, Citi's internal control over financial reporting.

88


Table of Contents


FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

        Certain statements in this Form 10-Q, including but not limited to statements included within the Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Generally, forward-looking statements are not based on historical facts but instead represent only Citigroup's and management's beliefs regarding future events. Such statements may be identified by words such as believe, expect, anticipate, intend, estimate, may increase, may fluctuate, and similar expressions, or future or conditional verbs such as will, should, would and could.

        Such statements are based on management's current expectations and are subject to uncertainty and changes in circumstances. Actual results may differ materially from those included in these statements due to a variety of factors, including but not limited to the factors listed and described under "Risk Factors" in Citi's 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2009 and those factors described below:

    the continuing impact of the economic recession, including without limitation potential declines in the Home Price Index and continued high unemployment in the U.S., and disruptions in the global financial markets on Citi's business and results of operations;

    the impact of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Financial Reform Act) on Citi's businesses, business practices and costs of operations;

    the continued impact of The Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009 on Citi's credit card businesses and business models;

    Citi's participation in U.S. government programs to modify first and second lien mortgage loans, as well as any future U.S. government modification programs and Citi's own loss mitigation and forbearance programs, and their effect on the amount and timing of Citi's earnings and credit losses related to those loans;

    the expiration of a provision of the U.S. tax law allowing Citi to defer U.S. taxes on certain active financial services income and its effect on Citi's tax expense;

    risks arising from Citi's extensive operations outside the U.S.;

    potential reduction in earnings available to Citi's common stockholders and return on Citi's equity due to future issuances of Citi common stock and preferred stock;

    the effect of the U.S. Treasury's sale of its stake in Citi on the market price of Citi common stock;

    an "ownership change" under the Internal Revenue Code and its effect on Citi's ability to utilize its deferred tax assets to offset future taxable income;

    the impact of increases in FDIC insurance premiums, as well as changes in the methodology to calculate such premiums, and other proposed fees on banks on Citi's earnings;

    Citi's ability to compete effectively in the financial services industry on a global, regional and product basis and with competitors who may face fewer regulatory constraints;

    Citi's ability to hire and retain qualified employees;

    Citi's ability to maintain the value of the Citi brand;

    Citi's ability to maintain, or increased cost of maintaining, adequate capital funding and liquidity, particularly in light of changing capital requirements pursuant to the Financial Reform Act, the capital standards to be adopted by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and U.S. regulators or otherwise;

    Citi's continuing ability to obtain financing from external sources and maintain adequate liquidity;

    reduction in Citi's or its subsidiaries' credit ratings, including in response to the passage of the Financial Reform Act, and its effect on the cost of funding from, and access to, the capital markets and on Citi's collateral requirements or other aspects of its costs of operations;

    market disruptions and their impact on the risk of customer or counterparty delinquency or default;

    Citi's ability to continue to successfully wind down Citi Holdings and its failure to realize all of the anticipated benefits of the realignment of Citi's businesses;

    Citi's ability to continue to control expenses, including through reductions at Citi Holdings, and to fund investments intended to enhance the success and operations of Citicorp;

    volatile and illiquid market conditions, which could lead to further write-downs of Citi's financial instruments;

    the accuracy of Citi's assumptions and estimates used to prepare its financial statements;

    changes in accounting standards, including potential changes relating to how Citi classifies, measures and reports financial instruments, determines impairment on those assets and accounts for hedges, and their impact on Citi's financial condition and results of operations;

    the effectiveness of Citi's risk management processes and strategies;

    the exposure of Citi to reputational damage and significant legal and regulatory liability as a member of the financial services industry; and

    a failure in Citi's operational systems or infrastructure, or those of third parties.

89



    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES

    TABLE OF CONTENTS

    CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

      
     

    Consolidated Statement of Income (Unaudited)—For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009

     
    92
     

    Consolidated Balance Sheet—June 30, 2010 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2009

     
    93
     

    Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders' Equity (Unaudited)—Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009

     
    95
     

    Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows (Unaudited)—Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009

     
    97
     

    Citibank Consolidated Balance Sheet—Citibank, N.A. and Subsidiaries—June 30, 2010 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2009

     
    99

    NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

      
     

    Note 1—Basis of Presentation

     
    101
     

    Note 2—Discontinued Operations

     
    107
     

    Note 3—Business Segments

     
    108
     

    Note 4—Interest Revenue and Expense

     
    109
     

    Note 5—Commissions and Fees

     
    110
     

    Note 6—Principal Transactions

     
    111
     

    Note 7—Retirement Benefits and Incentive Plans

     
    112
     

    Note 8—Earnings per Share

     
    114
     

    Note 9—Trading Account Assets and Liabilities

     
    115
     

    Note 10—Investments

     
    116
     

    Note 11—Goodwill and Intangible Assets

     
    127
     

    Note 12—Debt

     
    129
     

    Note 13—Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

     
    131
     

    Note 14—Securitizations and Variable Interest Entities

     
    132
     

    Note 15—Derivatives Activities

     
    151
     

    Note 16—Fair Value Measurement

     
    160
     

    Note 17—Fair Value Elections

     
    175
     

    Note 18—Fair Value of Financial Instruments

     
    180
     

    Note 19—Guarantees

     
    181
     

    Note 20—Contingencies

     
    186
     

    Note 21—Citibank, N.A. Stockholder's Equity

     
    187
     

    Note 22—Subsequent Events

     
    188
     

    Note 23—Condensed Consolidating Financial Statement Schedules

     
    188

    90


    This page intentionally left blank.

    91


    Table of Contents


    CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

    CITIGROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME (Unaudited)

    Citigroup Inc. and Subsidiaries

     
     Three months ended June 30,  Six months ended June 30,  
    In millions of dollars, except per-share amounts 2010  2009  2010  2009  

    Revenues

                 

    Interest revenue

      $20,418  $19,671  $41,270  $40,254 

    Interest expense

       6,379   6,842   12,670   14,499 
              

    Net interest revenue

      $14,039  $12,829  $28,600  $25,755 
              

    Commissions and fees

      $3,229  $4,084  $6,874  $8,068 

    Principal transactions

       2,217   1,788   6,370   5,701 

    Administration and other fiduciary fees

       910   1,472   1,932   3,078 

    Realized gains (losses) on sales of investments

       523   535   1,061   1,292 

    Other than temporary impairment losses on investments

                 
     

    Gross impairment losses

       (457)  (2,329)  (1,007)  (3,708)
     

    Less: Impairments recognized in Other comprehensive income (OCI)

       3   1,634   46   2,265 
              
     

    Net impairment losses recognized in earnings

      $(454) $(695) $(961) $(1,443)
              

    Insurance premiums

      $636  $745  $1,384  $1,500 

    Other revenue

       971   9,211   2,232   10,539 
              

    Total non-interest revenues

      $8,032  $17,140  $18,892  $28,735 
              

    Total revenues, net of interest expense

      $22,071  $29,969  $47,492  $54,490 
              

    Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

                 

    Provision for loan losses

      $6,523  $12,233  $14,889  $22,148 

    Policyholder benefits and claims

       213   308   500   640 

    Provision for unfunded lending commitments

       (71)  135   (106)  195 
              

    Total provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

      $6,665  $12,676  $15,283  $22,983 
              

    Operating expenses

                 

    Compensation and benefits

      $5,961  $6,359  $12,123  $12,594 

    Premises and equipment

       936   1,091   1,901   2,174 

    Technology/communication

       1,083   1,154   2,147   2,296 

    Advertising and marketing

       367   351   669   685 

    Restructuring

         (32)  (3)  (45)

    Other operating

       3,519   3,076   6,547   5,980 
              

    Total operating expenses

      $11,866  $11,999  $23,384  $23,684 
              

    Income from continuing operations before income taxes

      $3,540  $5,294  $8,825  $7,823 

    Provision for income taxes

       812   907   1,848   1,742 
              

    Income from continuing operations

      $2,728  $4,387  $6,977   6,081 
              

    Discontinued operations

                 

    Income (loss) from discontinued operations

      $(3) $(279) $(8) $(431)

    Gain on sale

         14   94   2 

    Provision (benefit) for income taxes

         (123)  (122)  (170)
              

    Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes

      $(3) $(142) $208  $(259)
              

    Net income before attribution of noncontrolling interests

      $2,725  $4,245  $7,185  $5,822 

    Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

       28   (34)  60   (50)
              

    Citigroup's net income

      $2,697  $4,279  $7,125  $5,872 
              

    Basic earnings per share

                 

    Income from continuing operations

      $0.09  $0.51  $0.24  $0.36 

    Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes

         (0.02)  0.01   (0.05)
              

    Net income

      $0.09  $0.49  $0.25  $0.31 
              

    Weighted average common shares outstanding

       28,849.4   5,399.5   28,646.9   5,392.3 
              

    Diluted earnings per share

                 

    Income from continuing operations

      $0.09  $0.51  $0.23  $0.36 

    Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes

         (0.02)  0.01   (0.05)
              

    Net income

      $0.09  $0.49  $0.24  $0.31 
              

    Adjusted weighted average common shares outstanding

       29,752.6   5,967.8   29,543.1   5,960.6 
              

    See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

    92


    Table of Contents

    CITIGROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

    CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET

    Citigroup Inc. and Subsidiaries

    In millions of dollars, except shares June 30,
    2010
     December 31,
    2009
     
     
     (Unaudited)
      
     

    Assets

           

    Cash and due from banks (including segregated cash and other deposits)

      $24,709  $25,472 

    Deposits with banks

       160,780   167,414 

    Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell (including $98,099 and $87,837 as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, at fair value)

       230,784   222,022 

    Brokerage receivables

       36,872   33,634 

    Trading account assets (including $119,567 and $111,219 pledged to creditors at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively)

       309,412   342,773 

    Investments (including $16,895 and $15,154 pledged to creditors at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively and $277,611and $246,429 at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, at fair value)

       317,066   306,119 

    Loans, net of unearned income

           
     

    Consumer (including $2,620 and $34 at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, at fair value)

       505,446   424,057 
     

    Corporate (including $2,358 and $1,405 at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, at fair value)

       186,720   167,447 
          

    Loans, net of unearned income

      $692,166  $591,504 
     

    Allowance for loan losses

       (46,197)  (36,033)
          

    Total loans, net

      $645,969  $555,471 

    Goodwill

       25,201   25,392 

    Intangible assets (other than MSRs)

       7,868   8,714 

    Mortgage servicing rights (MSRs)

       4,894   6,530 

    Other assets (including $18,716 and $12,664 as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, at fair value)

       174,101   163,105 
          

    Total assets

      $1,937,656  $1,856,646 
          

            The following table presents certain assets of consolidated variable interest entities (VIEs), which are included in the Consolidated Balance Sheet above. The assets in the table below include only those assets that can be used to settle obligations of consolidated VIEs on the following page, and are in excess of those obligations.

     
     June 30, 2010  

    Assets of consolidated VIEs that can only be used to settle obligations of consolidated VIEs

        

    Cash and due from banks (including segregated cash and other deposits)

      $2,721 

    Trading account assets

       4,187 

    Investments

       11,247 

    Loans, net of unearned income

        
     

    Consumer (including $2,590 at fair value)

       150,770 
     

    Corporate (including $680 at fair value)

       22,388 
        

    Loans, net of unearned income

      $173,158 
     

    Allowance for loan losses

       (13,916)
        

    Total loans, net

      $159,242 

    Other assets

       4,944 
        

    Total assets of consolidated VIEs that can only be used to settle obligations of consolidated VIEs

      $182,341 
        

    93


    Table of Contents

    CITIGROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

    CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
    (Continued)

    Citigroup Inc. and Subsidiaries

    In millions of dollars, except shares June 30,
    2010
     December 31,
    2009
     
     
     (Unaudited)
      
     

    Liabilities

           

    Non-interest-bearing deposits in U.S. offices

      $59,225  $71,325 

    Interest-bearing deposits in U.S. offices (including $642 and $700 at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, at fair value)

       241,820   232,093 

    Non-interest-bearing deposits in offices outside the U.S. 

       46,322   44,904 

    Interest-bearing deposits in offices outside the U.S. (including $745 and $845 at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, at fair value)

       466,584   487,581 
          

    Total deposits

      $813,951  $835,903 

    Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase (including $119,282 and $104,030 as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, at fair value)

       196,112   154,281 

    Brokerage payables

       54,774   60,846 

    Trading account liabilities

       131,001   137,512 

    Short-term borrowings (including $1,650 and $639 at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, at fair value)

       92,752   68,879 

    Long-term debt (including $25,858 and $25,942 at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, at fair value)

       413,297   364,019 

    Other liabilities (including $11,205 and $11,542 as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, at fair value)

       78,439   80,233 
          

    Total liabilities

      $1,780,326  $1,701,673 
          

    Stockholders' equity

           

    Preferred stock ($1.00 par value; authorized shares: 30 million), issued shares: 12,038 at June 30, 2010, at aggregate liquidation value

      $312  $312 

    Common stock ($0.01 par value; authorized shares: 60 billion), issued shares: 29,164,931,175 at June 30, 2010 and 28,626,100,389 at December 31, 2009

       292   286 

    Additional paid-in capital

       99,014   98,142 

    Retained earnings

       76,130   77,440 

    Treasury stock, at cost: June 30, 2010—189,512,054 shares and December 31, 2009—142,833,099 shares

       (1,772)  (4,543)

    Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

       (19,170)  (18,937)
          

    Total Citigroup stockholders' equity

      $154,806  $152,700 

    Noncontrolling interest

       2,524   2,273 
          

    Total equity

      $157,330  $154,973 
          

    Total liabilities and equity

      $1,937,656  $1,856,646 
          

    See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.


            The following table presents certain liabilities of consolidated VIEs, which are included in the Consolidated Balance Sheet above. The liabilities in the table below include third-party liabilities of consolidated VIEs only, and exclude intercompany balances that eliminate in consolidation. The liabilities also exclude amounts where creditors or beneficial interest holders have recourse to the general credit of Citigroup.

     
     June 30, 2010  

    Liabilities of consolidated VIEs for which creditors or beneficial interest holders do not have recourse to the general credit of Citigroup:

        

    Short-term borrowings

      $32,665 

    Long-term debt (including $5,418 at fair value)

       101,004 

    Other liabilities

       4,589 
        

    Total liabilities of consolidated VIEs for which creditors or beneficial interest holders do not have recourse to the general credit of Citigroup

      $138,258 
        

    94


    CITIGROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (Unaudited)

    Citigroup Inc. and Subsidiaries

     
     Six Months Ended June 30,  
    In millions of dollars, except shares in thousands 2010  2009  

    Preferred stock at aggregate liquidation value

           

    Balance, beginning of period

      $312  $70,664 

    Issuance of new preferred stock

         3,637 
          

    Balance, end of period

      $312  $74,301 
          

    Common stock and additional paid-in capital

           

    Balance, beginning of period

      $98,428  $19,222 

    Employee benefit plans(1)

       (913)  (3,892)

    Reset of convertible preferred stock conversion price

         1,285 

    Issuance of TARP-related warrants

         88 

    ADIA Upper Decs Equity Units Purchase Contract

       1,875   

    Other

       (84)  17 
          

    Balance, end of period

      $99,306  $16,720 
          

    Retained earnings

           

    Balance, beginning of period

      $77,440  $86,521 

    Adjustment to opening balance, net of taxes(2)(3)

       (8,442)  413 
          

    Adjusted balance, beginning of period

      $68,998  $86,934 

    Citigroup's net income

       7,125   5,872 

    Common dividends(4)

       7   (37)

    Preferred dividends

         (2,502)

    Preferred stock Series H discount accretion

         (108)

    Reset of convertible preferred stock conversion price

         (1,285)
          

    Balance, end of period

      $76,130  $88,874 
          

    Treasury stock, at cost

           

    Balance, beginning of period

      $(4,543) $(9,582)

    Issuance of shares pursuant to employee benefit plans

       2,774   3,617 

    Treasury stock acquired(5)

       (5)  (2)

    Other

       2   17 
          

    Balance, end of period

      $(1,772) $(5,950)
          

    Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

           

    Balance, beginning of period

      $(18,937) $(25,195)

    Adjustment to opening balance, net of taxes(2)

         (413)
          

    Adjusted balance, beginning of period

      $(18,937) $(25,608)

    Net change in unrealized gains and losses on investment securities, net of taxes

       2,088   3,005 

    Net change in cash flow hedges, net of taxes

       (2)  1,524 

    Net change in foreign currency translation adjustment, net of taxes

       (2,315)  (568)

    Pension liability adjustment, net of taxes

       (4)  4 
          

    Net change in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

      $(233) $3,965 
          

    Balance, end of period

      $(19,170) $(21,643)
          

    Total Citigroup common stockholders' equity (shares outstanding: 28,975,419 at June 30, 2010 and 28,483,267 at December 31, 2009)

      $154,494  $78,001 
          

    Total Citigroup stockholders' equity

      $154,806  $152,302 
          

    [Statement continues on the following page, including notes to table]

    95


    CITIGROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (Unaudited)
    (Continued)

    Citigroup Inc. and Subsidiaries

     
     Six Months Ended June 30,  
    In millions of dollars, except shares in thousands 2010  2009  

    Noncontrolling interest

           

    Balance, beginning of period

      $2,273  $2,392 
     

    Origination of a noncontrolling interest

       286   
     

    Transactions between noncontrolling interest shareholders and the related consolidating subsidiary

       (26)  (134)
     

    Transactions between Citigroup and the noncontrolling-interest shareholders

         (359)
     

    Net income attributable to noncontrolling-interest shareholders

       60   (50)
     

    Dividends paid to noncontrolling—interest shareholders

       (54)  (16)
     

    Accumulated other comprehensive income—net change in unrealized gains and losses on investment securities, net of tax

       6   1 
     

    Accumulated other comprehensive income—net change in FX translation adjustment, net of tax

       (105)  (31)
     

    All other

       84   63 
          

    Net change in noncontrolling interests

      $251  $(526)
          

    Balance, end of period

      $2,524  $1,866 
          

    Total equity

      $157,330  $154,168 
          

    Comprehensive income (loss)

           

    Net income before attribution of noncontrolling interests

      $7,185  $5,822 

    Net change in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

       (332)  3,935 
          

    Total comprehensive income

      $6,853  $9,757 
          

    Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to the noncontrolling interests

      $(39) $(80)
          

    Comprehensive income attributable to Citigroup

      $6,892  $9,837 
          

    (1)
    Includes unearned compensation on stock awards as well as the issuance in the second quarter of 2010 stock related to the "Common Stock Equivalents" (CSEs). For more information on the CSEs, see Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

    (2)
    The adjustment to the opening balances for Retained earnings and Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in 2009 represents the cumulative effect of initially adopting ASC 320-10-35-34, Investments—Debt and Equity securities: Recognition of an Other-Than-Temporary Impairment (formerly FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2).

    (3)
    The adjustment to the opening balance for Retained earnings in 2010 represents the cumulative effect of adopting SFAS 167, now incorporated into ASC 810, Consolidation.

    (4)
    Common dividends in 2010 represent a reversal of dividends accrued on forfeitures of previously issued but unvested employee stock awards related to employees who have left Citigroup. Common dividends declared were as follows: $0.01 per share in the first quarter of 2009.

    (5)
    All open market repurchases were transacted under an existing authorized share repurchase plan and relate to customer fails/errors.

    See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

    96


    CITIGROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)

     
     Six Months Ended June 30,  
    In millions of dollars 2010  2009  

    Cash flows from operating activities of continuing operations

           

    Net income before attribution of noncontrolling interests

      $7,185  $5,822 

    Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

       60   (50)
          

    Citigroup's net income

      $7,125  $5,872 
     

    Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes

       144   (261)
     

    Gain on sale, net of taxes

       64   2 
          
     

    Income from continuing operations—excluding noncontrolling interests

      $6,917  $6,131 

    Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities of continuing operations

           
     

    Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and present value of future profits

       168   196 
     

    Additions to deferred policy acquisition costs

       1,966   (221)
     

    Depreciation and amortization

       1,243   859 
     

    Provision for credit losses

       14,783   22,343 
     

    Change in trading account assets

       23,461   48,322 
     

    Change in trading account liabilities

       (6,511)  (47,786)
     

    Change in federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell

       (8,762)  1,324 
     

    Change in federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase

       41,831   (31,804)
     

    Change in brokerage receivables net of brokerage payables

       (9,310)  (7,763)
     

    Net losses (gains) from sales of investments

       (1,061)  (1,292)
     

    Change in loans held-for-sale

       (1,694)  (820)
     

    Other, net

       (21,430)  (9,916)
          

    Total adjustments

      $34,684  $(26,558)
          

    Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities of continuing operations

      $41,601  $(20,427)
          

    Cash flows from investing activities of continuing operations

           

    Change in deposits with banks

      $6,634  $(12,689)

    Change in loans

       55,314   (86,734)

    Proceeds from sales and securitizations of loans

       3,752   127,034 

    Purchases of investments

       (200,847)  (120,361)

    Proceeds from sales of investments

       78,983   47,441 

    Proceeds from maturities of investments

       95,806   57,536 

    Capital expenditures on premises and equipment

       (528)  (615)

    Proceeds from sales of premises and equipment, subsidiaries and affiliates, and repossessed assets

       1,164   4,845 
          

    Net cash provided by investing activities of continuing operations

      $40,278  $16,457 
          

    Cash flows from financing activities of continuing operations

           

    Dividends paid

      $  $(2,539)

    Issuance of ADIA Upper Decs equity units purchase contract

       1,875   

    Treasury stock acquired

       (5)  (2)

    Stock tendered for payment of withholding taxes

       (724)  (108)

    Issuance of long-term debt

       13,153   60,205 

    Payments and redemptions of long-term debt

       (41,765)  (66,652)

    Change in deposits

       (21,952)  30,552 

    Change in short-term borrowings

       (33,227)  (20,497)
          

    Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities of continuing operations

      $(82,645) $959 
          

    Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

       (48)  171 
          

    Net cash from discontinued operations

       51   502 
          

    Change in cash and due from banks

      $(763) $(2,338)

    Cash and due from banks at beginning of period

       25,472   29,253 
          

    Cash and due from banks at end of period

      $24,709  $26,915 
          

    Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information for continuing operations

           

    Cash paid during the period for income taxes

      $2,769  $(585)

    Cash paid during the period for interest

      $12,101  $15,084 
          

    Non-cash investing activities

           

    Transfers to repossessed assets

      $1,498  $1,363 
          

    See Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.

    97


    This page intentionally left blank.

    98


    Table of Contents

    CITIBANK, N.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES

    CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET

     
     Citibank, N.A. and Subsidiaries
     
    In millions of dollars, except shares June 30,
    2010
     December 31,
    2009
     
     
     (Unaudited)
      
     

    Assets

           

    Cash and due from banks

      $20,128  $20,246 

    Deposits with banks

       132,946   154,372 

    Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell

       29,174   31,434 

    Trading account assets (including $785 and $914 pledged to creditors at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively)

       143,568   156,380 

    Investments (including $5,238 and $3,849 pledged to creditors at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively)

       255,468   233,086 

    Loans, net of unearned income

       477,897   477,974 

    Allowance for loan losses

       (20,872)  (22,685)
          

    Total loans, net

      $457,025  $455,289 

    Goodwill

       9,839   10,200 

    Intangible assets, including MSRs

       6,237   8,243 

    Premises and equipment, net

       4,496   4,832 

    Interest and fees receivable

       6,353   6,840 

    Other assets

       92,643   80,439 
          

    Total assets

      $1,157,877  $1,161,361 
          

            The following table presents certain assets of consolidated VIEs, which are included in the Consolidated Balance Sheet above. The assets in the table below include only those assets that can be used to settle obligations of consolidated VIEs on the following page, and are in excess of those obligations.

     
     June 30, 2010  

    Assets of consolidated VIEs that can only be used to settle obligations of consolidated VIEs

        

    Cash and due from banks (including segregated cash and other deposits)

      $2,228 

    Trading account assets

       32 

    Investments

       8,914 

    Loans, net of unearned income

        
     

    Consumer (including $2,590 at fair value)

       41,892 
     

    Corporate (including $392 at fair value)

       21,593 
        

    Loans, net of unearned income

      $63,485 
     

    Allowance for loan losses

       (303)
        

    Total loans, net

      $63,182 

    Other assets

       1,775 
        

    Total assets of consolidated VIEs that can only be used to settle obligations of consolidated VIEs

      $76,131 
        

    [Statement continues on the following page]

    99


    Table of Contents

    CITIBANK, N.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES

    CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
    (Continued)

     
     Citibank, N.A. and Subsidiaries
     
    In millions of dollars, except shares June 30,
    2010
     December 31,
    2009
     
     
     (Unaudited)
      
     

    Liabilities

           

    Non-interest-bearing deposits in U.S. offices

      $66,524  $76,729 

    Interest-bearing deposits in U.S. offices

       188,010   176,149 

    Non-interest-bearing deposits in offices outside the U.S. 

       42,256   39,414 

    Interest-bearing deposits in offices outside the U.S. 

       474,629   479,350 
          

    Total deposits

      $771,419  $771,642 

    Trading account liabilities

       58,703   52,010 

    Purchased funds and other borrowings

       63,156   89,503 

    Accrued taxes and other expenses

       8,277   9,046 

    Long-term debt and subordinated notes

       92,394   82,086 

    Other liabilities

       41,206   39,181 
          

    Total liabilities

      $1,035,155  $1,043,468 
          

    Citibank stockholder's equity

           

    Capital stock ($20 par value) outstanding shares: 37,534,553 in each period

      $751  $751 

    Surplus

       109,099   107,923 

    Retained earnings

       23,975   19,457 

    Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)(1)

       (12,227)  (11,532)
          

    Total Citibank stockholder's equity

      $121,598  $116,599 

    Noncontrolling interest

       1,124   1,294 
          

    Total equity

      $122,722  $117,893 
          

    Total liabilities and equity

      $1,157,877  $1,161,361 
          

    (1)
    Amounts at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 include the after-tax amounts for net unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities of $(2.948) billion and $(4.735) billion, respectively, for foreign currency translation of $(5.963) billion and $(3.255) billion, respectively, for cash flow hedges of $(2.141) billion and $(2.367) billion, respectively, and for pension liability adjustments of $(1.175) billion and $(1.175) billion, respectively.

    See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.


            The following table presents certain liabilities of consolidated VIEs, which are included in the Consolidated Balance Sheet above. The liabilities in the table below include third-party liabilities of consolidated VIEs only, and exclude intercompany balances that eliminate in consolidation. The liabilities also exclude amounts where creditors or beneficial interest holders have recourse to the general credit of Citigroup.

     
     June 30, 2010  

    Liabilities of consolidated VIEs for which creditors or beneficial interest holders do not have recourse to the general credit of Citigroup:

        

    Short-term borrowings

      $28,258 

    Long-term debt (including $2,766 at fair value)

       35,862 

    Other liabilities

       2,928 
        

    Total liabilities of consolidated VIEs for which creditors or beneficial interest holders do not have recourse to the general credit of Citigroup

      $67,048 
        

    100


    CITIGROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

    NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

    1.    BASIS OF PRESENTATION

            The accompanying unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements as of June 30, 2010 and for the three- and six-month period ended June 30, 2010 include the accounts of Citigroup Inc. (Citigroup) and its subsidiaries (collectively, the Company). In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation have been reflected. The accompanying Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes included in Citigroup's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, Citigroup's updated 2009 historical financial statements and notes filed on Form 8-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on June 25, 2010 and Citigroup's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010.

            Certain financial information that is normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, but is not required for interim reporting purposes, has been condensed or omitted.

            Management must make estimates and assumptions that affect the Consolidated Financial Statements and the related footnote disclosures. While management makes its best judgment, actual results could differ from those estimates. Current market conditions increase the risk and complexity of the judgments in these estimates.

            Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior-period's financial statements to conform to the current period's presentation.

            As noted above, the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are unaudited.

    Citibank, N.A.

            Citibank, N.A. is a commercial bank and wholly owned subsidiary of Citigroup Inc. Citibank's principal offerings include consumer finance, mortgage lending, and retail banking products and services; investment banking, commercial banking, cash management, trade finance and e-commerce products and services; and private banking products and services.

            The Company includes a balance sheet and statement of changes in stockholder's equity for Citibank, N.A. to provide information about this entity to shareholders of Citigroup and international regulatory agencies (see Note 21 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion).

    Significant Accounting Policies

            The Company's accounting policies are fundamental to understanding management's discussion and analysis of results of operations and financial condition. The Company has identified six policies as being significant because they require management to make subjective and/or complex judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain. These policies relate to Valuations of Financial Instruments, Allowance for Credit Losses, Securitizations, Goodwill, Income Taxes and Legal Reserves. The Company, in consultation with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, has reviewed and approved these significant accounting policies, which are further described in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.

            A detailed discussion of the Company's accounting policies is included in Citigroup's updated 2009 historical financial statements and notes filed on Form 8-K with the SEC on June 25, 2010.

    Principles of Consolidation

            The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Company. The Company consolidates subsidiaries in which it holds, directly or indirectly, more than 50% of the voting rights or where it exercises control. Entities where the Company holds 20% to 50% of the voting rights and/or has the ability to exercise significant influence, other than investments of designated venture capital subsidiaries, or investments accounted for at fair value under the fair value option, are accounted for under the equity method, and the pro rata share of their income (loss) is included in Other revenue. Income from investments in less than 20%-owned companies is recognized when dividends are received. As discussed below, Citigroup consolidates entities deemed to be variable interest entities when Citigroup is determined to be the primary beneficiary. Gains and losses on the disposition of branches, subsidiaries, affiliates, buildings, and other investments and charges for management's estimate of impairment in their value that is other than temporary, such that recovery of the carrying amount is deemed unlikely, are included in Other revenue.

    101


    ACCOUNTING CHANGES

    Change in Accounting for Embedded Credit Derivatives

            In March 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-11, Scope Exception Related to Embedded Credit Derivatives. The ASU clarifies that certain embedded derivatives, such as those contained in certain securitizations, CDOs and structured notes, should be considered embedded credit derivatives subject to potential bifurcation and separate fair value accounting. The ASU allows any beneficial interest issued by a securitization vehicle to be accounted for under the fair value option at transition on July 1, 2010.

            The Company has elected to account for the following beneficial interests issued by securitization vehicles under the fair value option. Beneficial interests previously classified as held-to-maturity (HTM) were reclassified to available-for-sale (AFS) on June 30, 2010, because as of that reporting date, the Company did not have the intent to hold the beneficial interests until maturity.

            The following table also shows the gross gains and gross losses that make up the cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings for reclassified beneficial interests, recorded on July 1, 2010:

     
      
     July 1, 2010   
     
     
      
     Cumulative effect adjustment to Retained earnings   
     
    In millions of dollars at June 30, 2010 Amortized cost  Gross unrealized losses
    recognized in AOCI(1)
     Gross unrealized gains
    recognized in AOCI
     Fair Value  

    Mortgage-backed securities

                 
     

    Prime

     $390 $ $49 $439 
     

    Alt-A

      550    54  604 
     

    Subprime

      221    6  227 
     

    Non-U.S. residential

      2,244    38  2,282 
              
     

    Total mortgage-backed securities

     $3,405 $ $147 $3,552 
              

    Asset-backed securities

                 
     

    Auction rate securities

     $4,463 $401 $48 $4,110 
     

    Other asset-backed

      3,990    160  4,150 
              

    Total asset-backed securities

     $8,453 $401 $208 $8,260 
              

    Total reclassified debt securities

     $11,858 $401 $355 $11,812 
              

    (1)
    All reclassified debt securities with gross unrealized losses were assessed for other-than-temporary-impairment as of June 30, 2010, including an assessment of whether the Company intends to sell the security. For securities that the Company intends to sell, impairment charges of $176 million were recorded in earnings in the second quarter of 2010. Refer to Note 10 for more details on the total other-than-temporary-impairments recognized during the 3 months and 6 months ended June 30, 2010.

            Beginning July 1, 2010, the Company elected to account for these beneficial interests under the fair value option for various reasons, including:

      To reduce the operational burden of assessing beneficial interests for bifurcation under the guidance in the ASU;

      Where bifurcation would otherwise be required under the ASU, to avoid the complicated operational requirements of bifurcating the embedded derivatives from the host contracts and accounting for each separately. The Company reclassified substantially all beneficial interests where bifurcation would otherwise be required under the ASU; and

      To permit more economic hedging strategies without generating volatility in reported earnings.

    Additional Disclosures Regarding Fair Value Measurements

            In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-06, Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements. The ASU requires disclosing the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and 2 of the fair value hierarchy and describing the reasons for the transfers. The disclosures are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009. The Company adopted ASU 2010-06 as of January 1, 2010. The required disclosures are included in Note 16. Additionally, disclosures of the gross purchases, sales, issuances and settlements activity in Level 3 of the fair value measurement hierarchy will be required for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010.

    102


    Elimination of Qualifying Special Purpose Entities (QSPEs) and Changes in the Consolidation Model for VIEs

            In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140 (SFAS 166, now incorporated into ASC Topic 860) and SFAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (SFAS 167, now incorporated into ASC Topic 810). Citigroup adopted both standards on January 1, 2010. Citigroup has elected to apply SFAS 166 and SFAS 167 prospectively. Accordingly, prior periods have not been restated.

            SFAS 166 eliminates QSPEs. SFAS 167 details three key changes to the consolidation model. First, former QSPEs are now included in the scope of SFAS 167. Second, the FASB has changed the method of analyzing which party to a VIE should consolidate the VIE (known as the primary beneficiary) to a qualitative determination of which party to the VIE has "power," combined with potentially significant benefits or losses, instead of the previous quantitative risks and rewards model. The party that has "power" has the ability to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE's economic performance. Third, the new standard requires that the primary beneficiary analysis be re-evaluated whenever circumstances change. The previous rules required reconsideration of the primary beneficiary only when specified reconsideration events occurred.

            As a result of implementing these new accounting standards, Citigroup consolidated certain of the VIEs and former QSPEs with which it currently has involvement. Further, certain asset transfers, including transfers of portions of assets, that would have been considered sales under SFAS 140, are considered secured borrowings under the new standards.

            In accordance with SFAS 167, Citigroup employed three approaches for newly consolidating certain VIEs and former QSPEs as of January 1, 2010. The first approach requires initially measuring the assets, liabilities, and noncontrolling interests of the VIEs and former QSPEs at their carrying values (the amounts at which the assets, liabilities, and noncontrolling interests would have been carried in the Consolidated Financial Statements, if Citigroup had always consolidated these VIEs and former QSPEs). The second approach measures assets at their unpaid principal amount, and is applied where using carrying values is not practicable. The third approach is to elect the fair value option, in which all of the financial assets and liabilities of certain designated VIEs and former QSPEs are recorded at fair value upon adoption of SFAS 167 and continue to be marked-to-market thereafter, with changes in fair value reported in earnings.

            Citigroup consolidated all required VIEs and former QSPEs, as of January 1, 2010, at carrying values or unpaid principal amounts, except for certain private label residential mortgage and mutual fund deferred sales commissions VIEs, for which the fair value option was elected. The following tables present the impact of adopting these new accounting standards applying these approaches.

            The incremental impact of these changes on GAAP assets and resulting risk-weighted assets for those VIEs and former QSPEs that were consolidated or deconsolidated for accounting purposes as of January 1, 2010 was as follows:

     
     Incremental  
    In billions of dollars GAAP
    assets
     Risk-
    weighted
    assets(3)
     

    Impact of consolidation

           

    Credit cards

      $86.3  $0.8 

    Commercial paper conduits

       28.3   13.0 

    Student loans

       13.6   3.7 

    Private label consumer mortgages

       4.4   1.3 

    Municipal tender option bonds

       0.6   0.1 

    Collateralized loan obligations

       0.5   0.5 

    Mutual fund deferred sales commissions

       0.5   0.5 
          
     

    Subtotal

      $134.2  $19.9 
          

    Impact of deconsolidation

           

    Collateralized debt obligations(1)

      $1.9  $3.6 

    Equity-linked notes(2)

       1.2   0.5 
          

    Total

      $137.3  $24.0 
          

    (1)
    The implementation of SFAS 167 resulted in the deconsolidation of certain synthetic and cash collateralized debt obligation (CDO) VIEs that were previously consolidated under the requirements of ASC 810 (FIN 46(R)). Due to the deconsolidation of these synthetic CDOs, Citigroup's Consolidated Balance Sheet now reflects the recognition of current receivables and payables related to purchased and written credit default swaps entered into with these VIEs, which had previously been eliminated in consolidation. The deconsolidation of certain cash CDOs has a minimal impact on GAAP assets, but causes a sizable increase in risk-weighted assets. The impact on risk-weighted assets results from replacing, in Citigroup's trading account, largely investment grade securities owned by these VIEs when consolidated, with Citigroup's holdings of non-investment grade or unrated securities issued by these VIEs when deconsolidated.

    (2)
    Certain equity-linked note client intermediation transactions that had previously been consolidated under the requirements of ASC 810 (FIN 46 (R)) because Citigroup had repurchased and held a majority of the notes issued by the VIE were deconsolidated with the implementation of SFAS 167, because Citigroup does not have the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE's economic performance. Upon deconsolidation, Citigroup's Consolidated Balance Sheet reflects both the equity-linked notes issued by the VIEs and held by Citigroup as trading assets, as well as related trading liabilities in the form of prepaid equity derivatives. These trading assets and trading liabilities were formerly eliminated in consolidation.

    (3)
    The net increase in risk-weighted assets (RWA) was $10 billion, principally reflecting the deduction from gross RWA of $13 billion of loan loss reserves (LLR) recognized from the adoption of SFAS 166/167, which exceeded the 1.25% limitation on LLRs includable in Tier 2 Capital.

    103


            The following table reflects the incremental impact of adopting SFAS 166/167 on Citigroup's GAAP assets, liabilities, and stockholders' equity.

    In billions of dollars January 1,
    2010
     

    Assets

        

    Trading account assets

      $(9.9)

    Investments

       (0.6)

    Loans

       159.4 
     

    Allowance for loan losses

       (13.4)

    Other assets

       1.8 
        

    Total assets

      $137.3 
        

    Liabilities

        

    Short-term borrowings

      $58.3 

    Long-term debt

       86.1 

    Other liabilities

       1.3 
        

    Total liabilities

      $145.7 
        

    Stockholders' equity

        

    Retained earnings

      $(8.4)
        

    Total stockholders' equity

       (8.4)
        

    Total liabilities and stockholders' equity

      $137.3 
        

            The preceding tables reflect: (i) the portion of the assets of former QSPEs to which Citigroup, acting as principal, had transferred assets and received sales treatment prior to January 1, 2010 (totaling approximately $712.0 billion), and (ii) the assets of significant VIEs as of January 1, 2010 with which Citigroup is involved (totaling approximately $219.2 billion) that were previously unconsolidated and are required to be consolidated under the new accounting standards. Due to the variety of transaction structures and the level of Citigroup involvement in individual former QSPEs and VIEs, only a portion of the former QSPEs and VIEs with which the Company is involved were required to be consolidated.

            In addition, the cumulative effect of adopting these new accounting standards as of January 1, 2010 resulted in an aggregate after-tax charge to Retained earnings of $8.4 billion, reflecting the net effect of an overall pretax charge to Retained earnings (primarily relating to the establishment of loan loss reserves and the reversal of residual interests held) of $13.4 billion and the recognition of related deferred tax assets amounting to $5.0 billion.

            The impact on certain of Citigroup's regulatory capital ratios of adopting these new accounting standards, reflecting immediate implementation of the recently issued final risk-based capital rules regarding SFAS 166/167, was as follows:

     
     As of January 1, 2010
     
     Impact

    Tier 1 Capital

      (141) bps

    Total Capital

      (142) bps
       

    Non-consolidation of Certain Investment Funds

            The FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-10, Consolidation (Topic 810), Amendments for Certain Investment Funds (ASU 2010-10) in the first quarter of 2010. ASU 2010-10 provides a deferral to the requirements of SFAS 167 where the following criteria are met:

      The entity being evaluated for consolidation is an investment company, as defined, or an entity for which it is acceptable based on industry practice to apply measurement principles that are consistent with an investment company;

      The reporting enterprise does not have an explicit or implicit obligation to fund losses of the entity that could potentially be significant to the entity; and

      The entity being evaluated for consolidation is not:

        A securitization entity;

        An asset-backed financing entity;

        An entity that was formerly considered a qualifying special-purpose entity.

    The Company has determined that a majority of the investment vehicles managed by Citigroup are provided a deferral from the requirements of SFAS 167, because they meet these criteria. These vehicles continue to be evaluated under the requirements of ASC 810-10, prior to the implementation of SFAS 167 (FIN 46(R)).

            Where the Company has determined that certain investment vehicles are subject to the consolidation requirements of SFAS 167, the consolidation conclusions reached upon initial application of SFAS 167 are consistent with the consolidation conclusions reached under the requirements of ASC 810-10, prior to the implementation of SFAS 167.

    104


    Investments in Certain Entities that Calculate Net Asset Value per Share

            As of December 31, 2009, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2009-12, Investments in Certain Entities that Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or its Equivalent), which provides guidance on measuring the fair value of certain alternative investments. The ASU permits entities to use net asset value as a practical expedient to measure the fair value of their investments in certain investment funds. The ASU also requires additional disclosures regarding the nature and risks of such investments and provides guidance on the classification of such investments as Level 2 or Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. This ASU did not have a material impact on the Company's accounting for its investments in alternative investment funds.

    Multiple Foreign Exchange Rates

            In May 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-19, Foreign Currency Issues: Multiple Foreign Currency Exchange Rates. The ASU requires certain disclosure in situations when an entity's reported balances in U.S. dollar monetary assets held by its foreign entities differ from the actual U.S. dollar-denominated balances due to different foreign exchange rates used in remeasurement and translation. The ASU also clarifies the reporting for the difference between the reported balances and the U.S. dollar-denominated balances upon the initial adoption of highly inflationary accounting. The ASU does not have a material impact on the Company's accounting.

    FUTURE APPLICATIONS OF ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

    Loss-Contingency Disclosures

            In July 2010, the FASB issued a second exposure draft proposing expanded disclosures regarding loss contingencies. This proposal increases the number of loss contingencies subject to disclosure and requires substantial quantitative and qualitative information to be provided about those loss contingencies. The proposal will have no impact on the Company's accounting for loss contingencies.

    Credit Quality and Allowance for Credit Losses Disclosures

            In July 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-20, Disclosures about Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and Allowance for Credit Losses. The ASU requires a greater level of disaggregated information about the allowance for credit losses and the credit quality of financing receivables. The period-end balance disclosure requirements for loans and the allowance for loans losses will be effective for reporting periods ending on or after December 15, 2010, while disclosures for activity during a reporting period that occurs in the loan and allowance for loan losses accounts will be effective for reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2010.

    Effect of a Loan Modification When the Loan is Part of a Pool Accounted for as a Single Asset (ASU No. 2010-18)

            In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-18, Effect of a Loan Modification When the Loan is Part of a Pool Accounted for as a Single Asset. As a result of the amendments in this ASU, modifications of loans that are accounted for within a pool do not result in the removal of those loans from the pool, even if the modification of those loans would otherwise be considered a troubled debt restructuring. An entity will continue to be required to consider whether the pool of assets in which the loan is included is impaired if expected cash flows for the pool change. The ASU will be effective for reporting periods ending on or after July 15, 2010. The ASU will have no material effect on the Company's financial statements.

    Potential Amendments to Current Accounting Standards

            The FASB is currently working on amendments to existing accounting standards governing financial instruments and lease accounting. Upon completion of the standards, the Company will need to re-evaluate its accounting and disclosures. The FASB is proposing sweeping changes to the classification and measurement of financial instruments, hedging and impairment guidance. The FASB is also working on a project that would require all leases to be capitalized on the balance sheet. These projects will have significant impacts for the Company. However, due to ongoing deliberations of the standard-setters, the Company is currently unable to determine the effect of future amendments or proposals at this time.

    105


    Investment Company Audit Guide (SOP 07-1)

            In July 2007, the AICPA issued Statement of Position 07-1, "Clarification of the Scope of the Audit and Accounting Guide for Investment Companies and Accounting by Parent Companies and Equity Method Investors for Investments in Investment Companies" (SOP 07-1) (now incorporated into ASC 946-10, Financial Services-Investment Companies), which was expected to be effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2007. However, in February 2008, the FASB delayed the effective date indefinitely by issuing an FSP SOP 07-1-1, "Effective Date of AICPA Statement of Position 07-1." This statement sets forth more stringent criteria for qualifying as an investment company than does the predecessor Audit Guide. In addition, ASC 946-10 (SOP 07-1) establishes new criteria for a parent company or equity method investor to retain investment company accounting in their consolidated financial statements. Investment companies record all their investments at fair value with changes in value reflected in earnings. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of adopting the SOP.

    106



    2.    DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

    Sale of Nikko Cordial

            On October 1, 2009, the Company announced the successful completion of the sale of Nikko Cordial Securities to Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation. The transaction had a total cash value to Citi of 776 billion yen (U.S. $8.7 billion at an exchange rate of 89.60 yen to U.S. $1.00 as of September 30, 2009). The cash value is composed of the purchase price for the transferred business of 545 billion yen, the purchase price for certain Japanese-listed equity securities held by Nikko Cordial Securities of 30 billion yen, and 201 billion yen of excess cash derived through the repayment of outstanding indebtedness to Citi. After considering the impact of foreign exchange hedges of the proceeds of the transaction, the sale resulted in an immaterial gain in 2009. A total of about 7,800 employees are included in the transaction.

            The Nikko Cordial operations had total assets and total liabilities of approximately $24 billion and $16 billion, respectively, at the time of sale, which were reflected in Citi Holdings prior to the sale.

      Results for all of the Nikko Cordial businesses sold are reported as Discontinued operations for all periods presented.

            Summarized financial information for Discontinued operations, including cash flows, related to the sale of Nikko Cordial is as follows:

     
     Three Months
    June 30,
     Six Months
    Ended June 30,
     
    In millions of dollars 2010  2009  2010  2009  

    Total revenues, net of interest expense

      $  $112  $92  $380 
              

    Income (loss) from discontinued operations

      $  $(248) $(7) $(382)

    Gain on sale

           94   

    Benefit for income taxes and noncontrolling interest, net of taxes

         (83)  (122)  (133)
              

    Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes

      $  $(165) $209  $(249)
              

     

     
     Six Months
    June 30,
     
    In millions of dollars 2010  2009  

    Cash flows from operating activities

      $(134) $(1,194)

    Cash flows from investing activities

       185   1,667 

    Cash flows from financing activities

         
          

    Net cash provided by discontinued operations

      $51  $473 
          

    Combined Results for Discontinued Operations

            The following is summarized financial information for the Nikko Cordial business, German retail banking operations and CitiCapital business. The German retail banking operation, which was sold on December 5, 2008, and the Citi Capital business, which was sold on July 31, 2008, continue to have minimal residual costs associated with the sales. Additionally, contingency consideration payments received during the first quarter of 2009 of $29 million pretax ($19 million after-tax) related to the sale of Citigroup's Asset Management business, which was sold in December 2005, is also included in these balances.

     
     Three Months
    Ended June 30,
     Six Months
    Ended June 30,
     
    In millions of dollars 2010  2009  2010  2009  

    Total revenues, net of interest expense

      $18  $163  $135  $446 
              

    Income (loss) from discontinued operations

      $(3) $(279) $(8) $(431)

    Gain on sale

         14   94   2 

    Benefit for income taxes and noncontrolling interest, net of taxes

         (123)  (122)  (170)
              

    Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes

      $(3) $(142) $208  $(259)
              

    Cash flows from discontinued operations

     
     Six Months
    Ended June 30,
     
    In millions of dollars 2010  2009  

    Cash flows from operating activities

      $(132) $(1,175)

    Cash flows from investing activities

       186   1,686 

    Cash flows from financing activities

       (3)  (9)
          

    Net cash provided by discontinued operations

      $51  $502 
          

    107



    3.    BUSINESS SEGMENTS

            The following table presents certain information regarding the Company's operations by segment:

     
     Revenues, net
    of interest expense(1)
     Provision (benefit)
    for income taxes
     Income (loss) from
    continuing operations(1)(2)
     Identifiable assets  
     
     Three Months Ended June 30,   
      
     
    In millions of dollars, except
    identifiable assets in billions
     Jun. 30,
    2010
     Dec. 31,
    2009
     
     2010  2009  2010  2009  2010  2009  

    Regional Consumer Banking

      $8,032  $6,201  $336  $7  $1,177  $424  $309  $257 

    Institutional Clients Group

       8,457   9,184   940   1,143   2,619   2,812   902   882 
                      
     

    Subtotal Citicorp

       16,489   15,385   1,276   1,150   3,796   3,236   1,211   1,139 

    Citi Holdings

       4,919   15,325   (646)  789   (1,197)  1,182   465   487 

    Corporate/Other

       663   (741)  182   (1,032)  129   (31)  262   231 
                      

    Total

      $22,071  $29,969  $812  $907  $2,728  $4,387  $1,938  $1,857 
                      

     

     
     Revenues, net
    of interest expense(1)
     Provision (benefit)
    for income taxes
     Income (loss) from
    continuing operations(1)(2)
     
     
     Six Months Ended June 30,  
     
     2010  2009  2010  2009  2010  2009  

    Regional Consumer Banking

      $16,114  $12,554  $563  $163  $2,191  $1,215 

    Institutional Clients Group

       18,897   23,758   2,770   4,361   6,766   9,852 
                  
     

    Subtotal Citicorp

       35,011   36,312   3,333   4,524   8,957   11,067 

    Citi Holdings

       11,469   18,419   (1,592)  (2,799)  (2,073)  (4,303)

    Corporate/Other

       1,012   (241)  107   17   93   (683)
                  

    Total

      $47,492  $54,490  $1,848  $1,742  $6,977  $6,081 
                  

    (1)
    Includes Citicorp total revenues, net of interest expense, in North America of $7.0 billion and $4.6 billion; in EMEA of $3.0 billion and $3.8 billion; in Latin America of $3.0 billion and $3.3 billion; and in Asia of $3.5 billion and $3.7 billion for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Includes Citicorp total revenues, net of interest expense, in North America of $14.9 billion and $12.7 billion; in EMEAof $6.7 billion and $9.2 billion; in Latin America of $6.1 billion and $6.4 billion; and in Asia of $7.3 billion and $8.0 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Regional numbers exclude Citi Holdings and Corporate/Other, which largely operate within the U.S.

    (2)
    Includes pretax provisions (credits) for credit losses and for benefits and claims in the Regional Consumer Banking results of $2.5 billion and $2.1 billion; in the ICG results of $(210) million and $864 million; and in the Citi Holdings results of $4.3 billion and $9.7 billion for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Includes pretax provisions (credits) for credit losses and for benefits and claims in the Regional Consumer Banking results of $5.4 billion and $4.0 billion; in the ICGresults of $(295) million and $1.3 billion; and in the Citi Holdings results of $10.1 billion and $17.7 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

    108



    4.    INTEREST REVENUE AND EXPENSE

            For the three- and six- month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, interest revenue and expense consisted of the following:

     
     Three Months
    Ended June 30,
     Six Months
    Ended June 30,
     
    In millions of dollars 2010  2009  2010  2009  

    Interest revenue

                 

    Loan interest, including fees

      $14,227  $11,929  $28,900  $24,784 

    Deposits with banks

       291   377   581   813 

    Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell

       781   794   1,533   1,679 

    Investments, including dividends

       2,986   3,435   6,095   6,611 

    Trading account assets(1)

       2,011   2,921   3,883   5,872 

    Other interest

       122   215   278   495 
              

    Total interest revenue

      $20,418  $19,671  $41,270  $40,254 
              

    Interest expense

                 

    Deposits(2)

      $2,036  $2,840  $4,116  $5,688 

    Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase

       797   931   1,451   2,035 

    Trading account liabilities(1)

       106   69   169   177 

    Short-term borrowings

       215   315   491   778 

    Long-term debt

       3,225   2,687   6,443   5,821 
              

    Total interest expense

      $6,379  $6,842  $12,670  $14,499 
              

    Net interest revenue

      $14,039  $12,829  $28,600  $25,755 

    Provision for loan losses

       6,523   12,233   14,889   22,148 
              

    Net interest revenue after provision for loan losses

      $7,516  $596  $13,711  $3,607 
              

    (1)
    Interest expense on Trading account liabilities of ICG is reported as a reduction of interest revenue from Trading account assets.

    (2)
    Includes FDIC deposit insurance fees and charges of $242 million and $670 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009, and $465 million and $969 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009, respectively. The 2009 periods' FDIC insurance fees include the one-time FDIC special assessment of $333 million.

    109



    5.    COMMISSIONS AND FEES

            Commissions and fees revenue includes charges to customers for credit and bank cards, including transaction-processing fees and annual fees; advisory and equity and debt underwriting services; lending and deposit-related transactions, such as loan commitments, standby letters of credit and other deposit and loan servicing activities; investment management-related fees, including brokerage services and custody and trust services; and insurance fees and commissions.

            The following table presents commissions and fees revenue for the three and six months ended June 30:

     
     Three Months
    Ended June 30,
     Six Months
    Ended June 30,
     
    In millions of dollars 2010  2009  2010  2009  

    Credit cards and bank cards

      $999  $1,000  $1,964  $1,977 

    Investment banking

       473   1,061   1,318   1,875 

    Smith Barney

         321     836 

    ICG trading-related

       512   514   1,002   898 

    Transaction services

       364   328   711   644 

    Other consumer

       305   370   630   611 

    Checking-related

       260   248   533   512 

    Other ICG

       88   80   177   188 

    Primerica-related (prior to March 2010)

         76   91   149 

    Loan servicing(1)

       143   14   282   26 

    Corporate finance

       87   171   183   421 

    Other

       (2)  (99)  (17)  (69)
              

    Total commissions and fees

      $3,229  $4,084  $6,874  $8,068 
              

    (1)
    Beginning in the second quarter of 2010, for clarity purposes, Citigroup has reclassified the mortgage servicing rights (MSRs) Mark-to-market and MSR hedging activities from multiple income statement lines together into Other revenue. All periods presented reflect this reclassification.

    110



    6.    PRINCIPAL TRANSACTIONS

            Principal transactions revenue consists of realized and unrealized gains and losses from trading activities. Trading activities include revenues from fixed income, equities, credit and commodities products, as well as foreign exchange transactions. Not included in the table below is the impact of net interest revenue related to trading activities, which is an integral part of trading activities' profitability. The following tables present principal transactions revenue for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30:

     
     Three Months
    Ended June 30,
     Six Months
    Ended June 30,
     
    In millions of dollars 2010(1)  2009(1)  2010(1)  2009(1)  

    Regional Consumer Banking

      $79  $654  $249  $945 

    Institutional Clients Group

       1,632   880   4,976   7,830 
              
     

    Subtotal Citicorp

      $1,711  $1,534  $5,225  $8,775 

    Local Consumer Lending

       (19)  3   (154)  528 

    Brokerage and Asset Management

       (3)  41   (28)  24 

    Special Asset Pool

       604   (206)  1,750   (4,247)
              
     

    Subtotal Citi Holdings

      $582  $(162) $1,568  $(3,695)

    Corporate/Other

       (76)  416   (423)  621 
              

    Total Citigroup

      $2,217  $1,788  $6,370  $5,701 
              

     

     
     Three Months
    Ended June 30,
     Six Months
    Ended June 30,
     
    In millions of dollars 2010(1)  2009(1)  2010(1)  2009(1)  

    Interest rate contracts(2)

      $2,231  $1,613  $3,642  $6,453 

    Foreign exchange contracts(3)

       262   858   503   1,864 

    Equity contracts(4)

       (250)  (175)  315   903 

    Commodity and other contracts(5)

       121   130   230   827 

    Credit derivatives(6)

       (147)  (638)  1,680   (4,346)
              

    Total Citigroup

      $2,217  $1,788  $6,370  $5,701 
              

    (1)
    Beginning in the second quarter of 2010, for clarity purposes, Citigroup has reclassified the MSR mark-to-market and MSR hedging activities from multiple income statement lines together into Other Revenue. All periods presented reflect this reclassification.

    (2)
    Includes revenues from government securities and corporate debt, municipal securities, preferred stock, mortgage securities and other debt instruments. Also includes options on fixed income securities, interest rate swaps, swap options, caps and floors, financial futures, over-the-counter (OTC) options and forward contracts on fixed income securities.

    (3)
    Includes revenues from foreign exchange spot, forward, option and swap contracts, as well as translation gains and losses.

    (4)
    Includes revenues from common, preferred and convertible preferred stock, convertible corporate debt, equity-linked notes, and exchange-traded and OTC equity options and warrants.

    (5)
    Primarily includes revenues from crude oil, refined oil products, natural gas, and other commodities trades.

    (6)
    Includes revenues from structured credit products.

    111



    7.    RETIREMENT BENEFITS AND INCENTIVE PLANS

            The Company has several non-contributory defined benefit pension plans covering certain U.S. employees and has various defined benefit pension and termination indemnity plans covering employees outside the United States. The U.S. qualified defined benefit plan provides benefits under a cash balance formula. However, employees satisfying certain age and service requirements remain covered by a prior final average pay formula under that plan. Effective January 1, 2008, the U.S. qualified pension plan was frozen for most employees. Accordingly, no additional compensation-based contributions have been credited to the cash balance plan for existing plan participants after December 31, 2007. However, certain employees still covered under the prior final pay plan will continue to accrue benefits. The Company also offers postretirement health care and life insurance benefits to certain eligible U.S. retired employees, as well as to certain eligible employees outside the United States.

            The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (collectively, the "Act") were signed into law in the U.S. in March 2010. One provision of the Act that impacts Citigroup is the elimination of the tax deductibility for benefits paid that are related to the retiree Medicare Part D subsidy starting in 2013. Citigroup is required to recognize the full accounting impact in the period in which the Act is signed, which resulted in a $45 million reduction in deferred tax assets with a corresponding charge to income from continuing operations in the first quarter of 2010. The other provisions of the Act are not expected to have a significant impact on Citigroup's pension and post-retirement plans.

            The following tables summarize the components of net (benefit) expense recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Income for the Company's U.S. qualified pension plan, post-retirement plans and plans outside the United States. The Company uses a December 31 measurement date for the U.S. plans, as well as the plans outside the United States.


    Net (Benefit) Expense

     
     Three Months Ended June 30,  
     
     Pension Plans  Postretirement Benefit Plans  
     
     U.S. plans(1)  Non-U.S. plans  U.S. plans  Non-U.S. plans  
    In millions of dollars 2010  2009  2010  2009  2010  2009  2010  2009  

    Benefits earned during the period

      $5  $6  $41  $34  $  $  $6  $6 

    Interest cost on benefit obligation

       160   163   86   74   15   15   26   22 

    Expected return on plan assets

       (212)  (229)  (93)  (84)  (2)  (3)  (25)  (20)

    Amortization of unrecognized:

                             
     

    Net transition obligation

             (1)        
     

    Prior service cost (benefit)

       (1)  (2)  1   2   2       
     

    Net actuarial loss

       11   2   14   18   1     5   5 
                      
     

    Net (benefit) expense

      $(37) $(60) $49  $43  $16  $12  $12  $13 
                      

    (1)
    The U.S. plans exclude nonqualified pension plans, for which the net expense was $11 million and $9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

     
     Six Months Ended June 30,  
     
     Pension Plans  Postretirement Benefit Plans  
     
     U.S. plans(1)  Non-U.S. plans  U.S. plans  Non-U.S. plans  
    In millions of dollars 2010  2009  2010  2009  2010  2009  2010  2009  

    Benefits earned during the period

      $9  $12  $82  $71  $  $   12  $13 

    Interest cost on benefit obligation

       319   326   170   144   29   30   52   43 

    Expected return on plan assets

       (423)  (458)  (187)  (162)  (4)  (5)  (50)  (38)

    Amortization of unrecognized:

                             
     

    Net transition obligation

           (1)  (1)        
     

    Prior service cost (benefit)

       (1)  (1)  2   2   2       
     

    Net actuarial loss

       22   2   28   33   2   1   10   9 
                      

    Net (benefit) expense

      $(74) $(119) $94  $87  $29  $26   24  $27 
                      

    (1)
    The U.S. plans exclude nonqualified pension plans, for which the net expense was $22 million and $19 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

    112



    Employer Contributions

            Citigroup's pension funding policy for U.S. plans and non-U.S. plans is generally to fund to applicable minimum funding requirements, rather than to the amounts of accumulated benefit obligations. For the U.S. qualified pension plan, the Company may increase its contributions above the minimum required contribution under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, if appropriate to its tax and cash position and the plan's funded position. There were no minimum required cash contributions for the U.S. plans at June 30, 2010. For the non-U.S. pension plans, the Company contributed $58 million as of June 30, 2010 and expects to contribute an additional $103 million in 2010. The Company also expects to contribute $34 million of benefits to be paid directly by the Company on behalf of the non-U.S. pension plans. For the non-U.S. postretirement benefit plans, expected cash contributions for 2010 are $75 million, which includes $3 million of benefits to be paid directly by the Company. These estimates are subject to change, since contribution decisions are affected by various factors, such as market performance and regulatory requirements; in addition, management has the ability to change funding policy.


    Stock-Based Incentive Compensation

            The Company recognized compensation expense related to incentive plans of $269 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010, and $654 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The Company granted 353 million shares as equity awards in the second quarter, of which 346 million shares were issued in settlement of Common Stock Equivalent (CSE) awards, as approved by shareholders at the 2010 annual meeting. CSEs were awarded in the first quarter of 2010 as part of incentive compensation for the 2009 performance year in accordance with the terms of Citi's TARP repayment program. These awards were accrued for in 2009, and are not reflected in the expense numbers presented for 2010. The number of shares delivered to recipients was equal to their individual CSE award value divided by the fair market value of Citi common stock determined as of the grant date ($4.93), less shares withheld for taxes, as applicable. In accordance with the terms of the shareholder-approved program, the CSE awards were settled by new issues of common stock. Traditionally, Citi has settled equity award transactions by delivering shares from treasury stock.

            On April 20, 2010, 39 million stock options were issued to certain employees. The stock options issued vest one-third each on October 29, 2010, 2011, and 2012. The strike price of these options is $4.88 per share.

    113



    8.    EARNINGS PER SHARE

            The following is a reconciliation of the income and share data used in the basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) computations for the three and six months ended June 30:

     
     Three Months Ended June 30,  Six Months Ended June 30,  
    In millions, except per-share amounts 2010  2009  2010  2009  

    Income before attribution of noncontrolling interests

      $2,728  $4,387  $6,977  $6,081 

    Noncontrolling interests

       28   (34)  60   (50)
              

    Net income from continuing operations (for EPS purposes)

      $2,700  $4,421  $6,917  $6,131 

    Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes

       (3)  (142)  208   (259)
              

    Citigroup's net income (loss)

      $2,697  $4,279  $7,125  $5,872 

    Preferred dividends

         (1,495)    (2,716)

    Impact of the conversion price reset related to the $12.5 billion convertible preferred stock private issuance

             (1,285)

    Preferred stock Series H discount accretion

         (54)    (107)
              

    Net income (loss) available to common shareholders

      $2,697  $2,730  $7,125  $1,764 

    Dividends and undistributed earnings allocated to participating securities

       26   105   57   69 
              

    Net income (loss) allocated to common shareholders for basic EPS

      $2,671  $2,625  $7,068  $1,695 

    Effect of dilutive securities

         270     540 
              

    Net income (loss) allocated to common shareholders for diluted EPS

      $2,671  $2,895  $7,068  $2,235 
              

    Weighted-average common shares outstanding applicable to basic EPS

       28,849.4   5,399.5   28,646.9   5,392.3 

    Effect of dilutive securities

                 
     

    TDECs

       876.2     879.5   
     

    Other employee plans

       22.8     14.2   
     

    Convertible securities

       0.7   568.3   0.7   568.3 
     

    Options

       3.5     1.8   
              

    Adjusted weighted-average common shares outstanding applicable to diluted EPS

       29,752.6   5,967.8   29,543.1   5,960.6 
              

    Basic earnings per share

                 

    Income (loss) from continuing operations

      $0.09  $0.51  $0.24  $0.36 

    Discontinued operations

         (0.02)  0.01   (0.05)
              

    Net income (loss)

      $0.09  $0.49  $0.25  $0.31 
              

    Diluted earnings per share

                 

    Income (loss) from continuing operations

      $0.09  $0.51  $0.23  $0.36 

    Discontinued operations

         (0.02)  0.01   (0.05)
              

    Net income (loss)

      $0.09  $0.49  $0.24  $0.31 
              

            During the second quarters of 2010 and 2009, weighted-average options to purchase 98.1 million and 117.2 million shares of common stock, respectively, were outstanding but not included in the computation of earnings per common share, because the weighted-average exercise prices of $28.35 and $40.19, respectively, were greater than the average market price of the Company's common stock.

            Warrants issued to the U.S. Treasury as part of the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) and the loss-sharing agreement, with exercise prices of $17.85 and $10.61 for approximately 210 million and 255 million shares of common stock, respectively, were not included in the computation of earnings per common share in 2010 and 2009, because they were anti-dilutive.

            Equity awards granted under the Management Committee Long-Term Incentive Plan (MC LTIP) were not included in the 2009 computation of earnings per common share, because the performance targets under the terms of the awards were not met and, as a result, the awards expired in the first quarter of 2010. In addition, other performance-based equity awards of approximately 5 million shares were not included in the second quarter 2010 earnings per share computation, because the performance targets under the terms of the awards were not met.

            Equity units convertible into approximately 177 million shares and 235 million shares of Citigroup common stock held by the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority (ADIA) were not included in the computation of earnings per common share in the second quarters of 2010 and 2009, respectively, because the exercise price of $31.83 was greater than the average market price of the Company's common stock.

    114



    9.    TRADING ACCOUNT ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

            Trading account assets and Trading account liabilities, at fair value, consisted of the following at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:

    In millions of dollars June 30,
    2010
     December 31,
    2009
     

    Trading account assets

           

    Mortgage-backed securities(1)

           
     

    U.S. government agency guaranteed

      $24,911  $20,638 
     

    Prime

       1,663   1,156 
     

    Alt-A

       1,399   1,229 
     

    Subprime

       2,511   9,734 
     

    Non-U.S. residential

       2,378   2,368 
     

    Commercial

       3,229   3,455 
          

    Total mortgage-backed securities(1)

      $36,091  $38,580 
          

    U.S. Treasury and federal agencies

           
     

    U.S. Treasuries

      $21,641  $28,938 
     

    Agency and direct obligations

       4,184   2,041 
          

    Total U.S. Treasury and federal agencies

      $25,825  $30,979 
          

    State and municipal securities

       6,646  $7,147 

    Foreign government securities

       80,504   72,769 

    Corporate

       49,132   51,985 

    Derivatives(2)

       56,521   58,879 

    Equity securities

       34,720   46,221 

    Asset-backed securities(1)

       5,952   4,089 

    Other debt securities

       14,021   32,124 
          

    Total trading account assets

      $309,412  $342,773 
          

    Trading account liabilities

           

    Securities sold, not yet purchased

      $71,728  $73,406 

    Derivatives(2)

       59,273   64,106 
          

    Total trading account liabilities

      $131,001  $137,512 
          

    (1)
    The Company invests in mortgage-backed securities and asset-backed securities. Mortgage securitizations are generally considered variable interest entities (VIEs). The Company's maximum exposure to loss from these VIEs is equal to the carrying amount of the securities, which is reflected in the table above. For mortgage-backed and asset-backed securitizations in which the Company has other involvement, information is provided in Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

    (2)
    Presented net, pursuant to master netting agreements. See Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion regarding the accounting and reporting for derivatives.

    115



    10.    INVESTMENTS

    In millions of dollars June 30,
    2010
     December 31,
    2009
     

    Securities available-for-sale

      $270,913  $239,599 

    Debt securities held-to-maturity(1)

       31,283   51,527 

    Non-marketable equity securities carried at fair value(2)

       6,698   6,830 

    Non-marketable equity securities carried at cost(3)

       8,172   8,163 
          

    Total investments

      $317,066  $306,119 
          

    (1)
    Recorded at amortized cost, less impairment on securities that have credit-related impairment.

    (2)
    Unrealized gains and losses for non-marketable equity securities carried at fair value are recognized in earnings.

    (3)
    Non-marketable equity securities carried at cost primarily consist of shares issued by the Federal Reserve Bank, Federal Home Loan Bank, foreign central banks and various clearing houses of which Citigroup is a member.

    Securities Available-for-Sale

            The amortized cost and fair value of securities available-for-sale (AFS) at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 were as follows:

     
     June 30, 2010  December 31, 2009  
    In millions of dollars Amortized
    cost
     Gross
    unrealized
    gains
     Gross
    unrealized
    Losses
     Fair
    value
     Amortized
    cost
     Gross
    unrealized
    gains
     Gross
    unrealized
    losses
     Fair
    value
     

    Debt securities AFS

                             

    Mortgage-backed securities(1)

                             
     

    U.S. government-agency guaranteed

      $19,706  $693  $1  $20,398  $20,625  $339  $50  $20,914 
     

    Prime

       6,453   57   852   5,658   7,291   119   932   6,478 
     

    Alt-A

       655   56   1   710   538   93   4   627 
     

    Subprime

       117   6     123   1       1 
     

    Non-U.S. residential

       2,426   42   7   2,461   258     3   255 
     

    Commercial

       670   25   56   639   883   10   100   793 
                      

    Total mortgage-backed securities

      $30,027  $879  $917  $29,989  $29,596  $561  $1,089  $29,068 

    U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities

                             
     

    U.S. Treasury

       39,058   602     39,660   26,857   36   331   26,562 
     

    Agency obligations

       44,050   521   1   44,570   27,714   46   208   27,552 
                      

    Total U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities

      $83,108  $1,123  $1  $84,230  $54,571  $82  $539  $54,114 

    State and municipal

       17,555   150   2,131   15,574   16,677   147   1,214   15,610 

    Foreign government

       97,653   1,382   164   98,871   101,987   860   328   102,519 

    Corporate

       16,146   412   63   16,495   20,024   435   146   20,313 

    Asset-backed securities(1)

       18,157   240   445   17,952   10,089   50   93   10,046 

    Other debt securities

       2,229   30   65   2,194   2,179   21   77   2,123 
                      

    Total debt securities AFS

      $264,875  $4,216  $3,786  $265,305  $235,123  $2,156  $3,486  $233,793 
                      

    Marketable equity securities AFS

      $3,958  $1,911  $261  $5,608  $4,089  $1,929  $212  $5,806 
                      

    Total securities AFS

      $268,833  $6,127  $4,047  $270,913  $239,212  $4,085  $3,698  $239,599 
                      

    (1)
    The Company invests in mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities. These securitizations are generally considered VIEs. The Company's maximum exposure to loss from these VIEs is equal to the carrying amount of the securities, which is reflected in the table above. For mortgage-backed and asset-backed securitizations in which the Company has other involvement, information is provided in Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

            As discussed in more detail below, the Company conducts and documents periodic reviews of all securities with unrealized losses to evaluate whether the impairment is other-than-temporary. Any credit-related impairment related to debt securities the Company does not intend to sell and is not likely to be required to sell is recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Income, with the non-credit-related impairment recognized in OCI. For other impaired debt securities that the Company intends to sell, the entire impairment is recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Income.

    116


            The table below shows the fair value of investments in AFS securities that have been in an unrealized loss position for less than 12 months or for 12 months or longer as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:

     
     Less than 12 months  12 months or longer  Total  
    In millions of dollars Fair
    value
     Gross
    unrealized
    losses
     Fair
    value
     Gross
    unrealized
    losses
     Fair
    value
     Gross
    unrealized
    losses
     

    June 30, 2010

                       

    Securities AFS

                       

    Mortgage-backed securities

                       
     

    U.S. government-agency guaranteed

      $225 $1 $23 $ $248 $1 
     

    Prime

       96  6  4,532  846  4,628  852 
     

    Alt-A

          7  1  7  1 
     

    Subprime

                 
     

    Non-U.S. residential

          413  7  413  7 
     

    Commercial

       70  17  39  39  109  56 
                  

    Total mortgage-backed securities

      $391 $24 $5,014 $893 $5,405 $917 

    U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities

                       
     

    U.S. Treasury

       200        200   
     

    Agency obligations

       1,317  1      1,317  1 
                  

    Total U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities

      $1,517 $1 $ $ $1,517 $1 

    State and municipal

       208  21  9,640  2,110  9,848  2,131 

    Foreign government

       29,732  72  2,994  92  32,726  164 

    Corporate

       913  35  406  28  1,319  63 

    Asset-backed securities

       1,125  357  5,220  88  6,345  445 

    Other debt securities

          526  65  526  65 

    Marketable equity securities AFS

       89  3  2,255  258  2,344  261 
                  

    Total securities AFS

      $33,975 $513 $26,055 $3,534 $60,030 $4,047 
                  

    December 31, 2009

                       

    Securities AFS

                       

    Mortgage-backed securities

                       
     

    U.S. government-agency guaranteed

     $6,793 $47 $263 $3 $7,056 $50 
     

    Prime

      5,074  905  228  27  5,302  932 
     

    Alt-A

      106    35  4  141  4 
     

    Subprime

                 
     

    Non-U.S. residential

      250  3      250  3 
     

    Commercial

      93  2  259  98  352  100 
                  

    Total mortgage-backed securities

     $12,316 $957 $785 $132 $13,101 $1,089 

    U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities

                       
     

    U.S. Treasury

      23,378  224  308  107  23,686  331 
     

    Agency obligations

      17,957  208  7    17,964  208 
                  

    Total U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities

     $41,335 $432 $315 $107 $41,650 $539 

    State and municipal

      754  97  10,630  1,117  11,384  1,214 

    Foreign government

      39,241  217  10,398  111  49,639  328 

    Corporate

      1,165  47  907  99  2,072  146 

    Asset-backed securities

      627  4  986  89  1,613  93 

    Other debt securities

      28  2  647  75  675  77 

    Marketable equity securities AFS

      102  4  2,526  208  2,628  212 
                  

    Total securities AFS

     $95,568 $1,760 $27,194 $1,938 $122,762 $3,698 
                  

    117


            The following table presents the amortized cost and fair value of debt securities available-for-sale by contractual maturity dates as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:

     
     June 30, 2010  December 31, 2009  
    In millions of dollars Amortized
    Cost
     Fair
    value
     Amortized
    cost
     Fair
    value
     

    Mortgage-backed securities(1)

                 

    Due within 1 year

      $  $  $2  $3 

    After 1 but within 5 years

       9   9   16   16 

    After 5 but within 10 years

       519   506   626   597 

    After 10 years(2)

       29,499   29,474   28,952   28,452 
              

    Total

      $30,027  $29,989  $29,596  $29,068 
              

    U.S. Treasury and federal agencies

                 

    Due within 1 year

      $11,011  $11,033  $5,357  $5,366 

    After 1 but within 5 years

       56,288   56,913   35,912   35,618 

    After 5 but within 10 years

       13,170   13,534   8,815   8,773 

    After 10 years(2)

       2,639   2,750   4,487   4,357 
              

    Total

      $83,108  $84,230  $54,571  $54,114 
              

    State and municipal

                 

    Due within 1 year

      $14  $14  $7  $8 

    After 1 but within 5 years

       145   152   119   129 

    After 5 but within 10 years

       209   215   340   359 

    After 10 years(2)

       17,187   15,193   16,211   15,114 
              

    Total

      $17,555  $15,574  $16,677  $15,610 
              

    Foreign government

                 

    Due within 1 year

      $35,137  $35,221  $32,223  $32,365 

    After 1 but within 5 years

       54,865   55,652   61,165   61,426 

    After 5 but within 10 years

       6,855   7,061   7,844   7,845 

    After 10 years(2)

       796   937   755   883 
              

    Total

      $97,653  $98,871  $101,987  $102,519 
              

    All other(3)

                 

    Due within 1 year

      $2,821  $2,830  $4,243  $4,244 

    After 1 but within 5 years

       20,087   20,247   14,286   14,494 

    After 5 but within 10 years

       3,182   3,380   9,483   9,597 

    After 10 years(2)

       10,442   10,184   4,280   4,147 
              

    Total

      $36,532  $36,641  $32,292  $32,482 
              

    Total debt securities AFS

      $264,875  $265,305  $235,123  $233,793 
              

    (1)
    Includes mortgage-backed securities of U.S. federal agencies.

    (2)
    Investments with no stated maturities are included as contractual maturities of greater than 10 years. Actual maturities may differ due to call or prepayment rights.

    (3)
    Includes corporate securities and other debt securities.

            The following tables present interest and dividends on all investments for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009:

     
     Three months ended  Six months ended  
    In millions of dollars June 30,
    2010
     June 30,
    2009
     June 30,
    2010
     June 30,
    2009
     

    Taxable interest

      $2,675  $3,115  $5,543 $6,128 

    Interest exempt from U.S. federal income tax

       197   247   370  365 

    Dividends

       114   73   182  118 
              

    Total interest and dividends

      $2,986  $3,435  $6,095 $6,611 
              

    118


            The following table presents realized gains and losses on all investments for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009. The gross realized investment losses exclude losses from other-than-temporary impairment:

     
     Three months ended  Six months ended  
    In millions of dollars June 30,
    2010
     June 30,
    2009
     June 30,
    2010
     June 30,
    2009
     

    Gross realized investment gains

      $554  $577  $1,147 $1,358 

    Gross realized investment losses(1)

       (31)  (42)  (86) (66)
              

    Net realized gains

      $523  $535  $1,061 $1,292 
              

    (1)
    During the first quarter of 2010, the Company sold four corporate debt securities that were classified as held-to-maturity. These sales were in response to a significant deterioration in the creditworthiness of the issuers. The securities sold had a carrying value of $413 million, and the Company recorded a realized loss of $49 million.

    Debt Securities Held-to-Maturity

            The carrying value and fair value of securities held-to-maturity (HTM) at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 were as follows:

    In millions of dollars Amortized
    cost(1)
     Net unrealized
    loss
    recognized in
    AOCI
     Carrying
    value(2)
     Gross
    unrecognized
    gains
     Gross
    unrecognized
    losses
     Fair
    value
     

    June 30, 2010

                       

    Debt securities HTM(3)

                       

    Mortgage-backed securities

                       
     

    Prime

      $5,154  $919  $4,235  $191  $4  $4,422 
     

    Alt-A

       12,843   3,472   9,371   304   139   9,536 
     

    Subprime

       880   121   759   29   41   747 
     

    Non-U.S. residential

       5,030   786   4,244   307   77   4,474 
     

    Commercial

       1,090   26   1,064     138   926 
                  
     

    Total mortgage-backed securities

      $24,997  $5,324  $19,673  $831  $399  $20,105 

    State and municipal

       2,688   147   2,541   89   80   2,550 

    Corporate

       6,528   182   6,346   456   184   6,618 

    Asset-backed securities(3)

       2,798   75   2,723   26   158   2,591 

    Other debt securities

                 
                  

    Total debt securities HTM

      $37,011  $5,728  $31,283  $1,402  $821  $31,864 
                  

    December 31, 2009

                       

    Debt securities HTM(3)

                       

    Mortgage-backed securities

                       
     

    Prime

     $6,118 $1,151 $4,967 $317 $5 $5,279 
     

    Alt-A

      14,710  4,276  10,434  905  243  11,096 
     

    Subprime

      1,087  128  959  77  100  936 
     

    Non-U.S. residential

      9,002  1,119  7,883  469  134  8,218 
     

    Commercial

      1,303  45  1,258  1  208  1,051 
                  
     

    Total mortgage-backed securities

     $32,220 $6,719 $25,501 $1,769 $690 $26,580 

    State and municipal

      3,067  147  2,920  92  113  2,899 

    Corporate

      7,457  264  7,193  524  182  7,535 

    Asset-backed securities(3)

      16,348  435  15,913  567  496  15,984 

    Other debt securities

                 
                  

    Total debt securities HTM

     $59,092 $7,565 $51,527 $2,952 $1,481 $52,998 
                  

    (1)
    For securities transferred to HTM from Trading account assets, amortized cost is defined as the fair value amount of the securities at the date of transfer plus any accretion income and less any impairments recognized in earnings subsequent to transfer. For securities transferred to HTM from AFS, amortized cost is defined as the original purchase cost, plus or minus any accretion or amortization of a purchase discount or premium, less any impairment recognized in earnings.

    (2)
    HTM securities are carried on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at amortized cost and the changes in the value of these securities, other than impairment charges, are not reported on the financial statements.

    (3)
    The Company invests in mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities. These securitizations are generally considered variable interest entities (VIEs). The Company's maximum exposure to loss from these VIEs is equal to the carrying amount of the securities, which is reflected in the table above. For mortgage-backed and asset-backed securitizations in which the Company has other involvement, information is provided in Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

    119


            The net unrealized losses classified in AOCI relate to debt securities reclassified from AFS investments to HTM investments. Additionally, for HTM securities that have suffered credit impairment, declines in fair value for reasons other than credit losses are recorded in AOCI. The AOCI balance was $5.7 billion as of June 30, 2010, compared to $7.6 billion as of December 31, 2009. The AOCI balance for HTM securities is amortized over the remaining life of the related securities as an adjustment of yield in a manner consistent with the accretion of discount on the same debt securities. This will have no impact on the Company's net income because the amortization of the unrealized holding loss reported in equity will offset the effect on interest income of the accretion of the discount on these securities.

            The credit-related impairment on HTM securities is recognized in earnings.

    120


            The table below shows the fair value of investments in HTM that have been in an unrecognized loss position for less than 12 months or for 12 months or longer as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:

     
     Less than 12 months  12 months or longer  Total  
    In millions of dollars Fair
    value
     Gross
    unrecognized
    losses
     Fair
    value
     Gross
    unrecognized
    losses
     Fair
    value
     Gross
    unrecognized
    losses
     

    June 30, 2010

                       

    Debt securities HTM

                       

    Mortgage-backed securities

      $76  $14  $14,048  $385  $14,124  $399 

    State and municipal

       505   38   165   42   670   80 

    Corporate

           3,091   184   3,091   184 

    Asset-backed securities

           1,071   158   1,071   158 

    Other debt securities

                 
                  

    Total debt securities HTM

      $581  $52  $18,375  $769  $18,956  $821 
                  

    December 31, 2009

                       

    Debt securities HTM

                       

    Mortgage-backed securities

     $ $ $16,923 $690 $16,923 $690 

    State and municipal

      755  79  713  34  1,468  113 

    Corporate

          1,519  182  1,519  182 

    Asset-backed securities

      348  18  5,460  478  5,808  496 

    Other debt securities

                 
                  

    Total debt securities HTM

     $1,103 $97 $24,615 $1,384 $25,718 $1,481 
                  

            Excluded from the gross unrecognized losses presented in the above table are the $5.7 billion and $7.6 billion of gross unrealized losses recorded in AOCI mainly related to the HTM securities that were reclassified from AFS investments as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. Virtually all of these unrealized losses relate to securities that have been in a loss position for 12 months or longer at both June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.

            The following table presents the carrying value and fair value of HTM debt securities by contractual maturity dates as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:

     
     June 30, 2010  December 31, 2009  
    In millions of dollars Carrying value  Fair value  Carrying value  Fair value  

    Mortgage-backed securities

                 

    Due within 1 year

      $  $  $1  $1 

    After 1 but within 5 years

       301   269   466   385 

    After 5 but within 10 years

       551   481   697   605 

    After 10 years(1)

       18,821   19,355   24,337   25,589 
              

    Total

      $19,673  $20,105  $25,501  $26,580 
              

    State and municipal

                 

    Due within 1 year

      $19  $20  $6  $6 

    After 1 but within 5 years

       52   54   53   79 

    After 5 but within 10 years

       88   89   99   99 

    After 10 years(1)

       2,382   2,387   2,762   2,715 
              

    Total

      $2,541  $2,550  $2,920  $2,899 
              

    All other(2)

                 

    Due within 1 year

      $1,187  $1,193  $4,652  $4,875 

    After 1 but within 5 years

       1,247   1,330   3,795   3,858 

    After 5 but within 10 years

       4,766   4,937   6,240   6,526 

    After 10 years(1)

       1,869   1,749   8,419   8,260 
              

    Total

      $9,069  $9,209  $23,106  $23,519 
              

    Total debt securities HTM

      $31,283  $31,864  $51,527  $52,998 
              

    (1)
    Investments with no stated maturities are included as contractual maturities of greater than 10 years. Actual maturities may differ due to call or prepayment rights.

    (2)
    Includes asset-backed securities and all other debt securities.

    121


    Evaluating Investments for Other-Than-Temporary Impairments

            The Company conducts and documents periodic reviews of all securities with unrealized losses to evaluate whether the impairment is other than temporary. Prior to January 1, 2009, these reviews were conducted pursuant to FASB Staff Position No. FAS 115-1, The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and its Application to Certain Investments (now incorporated into ASC 320-10-35, Investments—Debt and Equity Securities—Subsequent Measurement). Any unrealized loss identified as other-than-temporary was recorded directly in the Consolidated Statement of Income. As of January 1, 2009, the Company adopted FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 (now incorporated into ASC 320-10-35-34, Investments—Debt and Equity Securities: Recognition of an Other-Than-Temporary Impairment). This guidance amends the impairment model for debt securities; the impairment model for equity securities was not affected.

            Under the guidance for debt securities, other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) is recognized in earnings for debt securities which the Company has an intent to sell or which the Company believes it is more-likely-than-not that it will be required to sell prior to recovery of the amortized cost basis. For those securities which the Company does not intend to sell or expect to be required to sell, credit-related impairment is recognized in earnings, with the non-credit-related impairment recorded in AOCI.

            An unrealized loss exists when the current fair value of an individual security is less than its amortized cost basis. Unrealized losses that are determined to be temporary in nature are recorded, net of tax, in AOCI for AFS securities, while such losses related to HTM securities are not recorded, as these investments are carried at their amortized cost. For securities transferred to HTM from Trading account assets, amortized cost is defined as the fair value of the securities at the date of transfer, plus any accretion income and less any impairment recognized in earnings subsequent to transfer. For securities transferred to HTM from AFS, amortized cost is defined as the original purchase cost, plus or minus any accretion or amortization of a purchase discount or premium, less any impairment recognized in earnings subsequent to transfer.

            Regardless of the classification of the securities as AFS or HTM, the Company has assessed each position for impairment.

            Factors considered in determining whether a loss is temporary include:

      the length of time and the extent to which fair value has been below cost;

      the severity of the impairment;

      the cause of the impairment and the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer;

      activity in the market of the issuer which may indicate adverse credit conditions; and

      the Company's ability and intent to hold the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery.

            The Company's review for impairment generally entails:

      identification and evaluation of investments that have indications of possible impairment;

      analysis of individual investments that have fair values less than amortized cost, including consideration of the length of time the investment has been in an unrealized loss position and the expected recovery period;

      discussion of evidential matter, including an evaluation of factors or triggers that could cause individual investments to qualify as having other-than-temporary impairment and those that would not support other-than-temporary impairment; and

      documentation of the results of these analyses, as required under business policies.

            For equity securities, management considers the various factors described above, including its intent and ability to hold the equity security for a period of time sufficient for recovery to cost. Where management lacks that intent or ability, the security's decline in fair value is deemed to be other than temporary and is recorded in earnings. AFS equity securities deemed other-than-temporarily impaired are written down to fair value, with the full difference between fair value and cost recognized in earnings.

            For debt securities that are not deemed to be credit impaired, management assesses whether it intends to sell or whether it is more-likely-than-not that it would be required to sell the investment before the expected recovery of the amortized cost basis. In most cases, management has asserted that it has no intent to sell and that it believes it is not likely to be required to sell the investment before recovery of its amortized cost basis. Where such an assertion has not been made, the security's decline in fair value is deemed to be other-than-temporary and is recorded in earnings.

            For debt securities, a critical component of the evaluation for OTTI is the identification of credit impaired securities, where management does not expect to receive cash flows sufficient to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the security. For securities purchased and classified as AFS with the expectation of receiving full principal and interest cash flows, this analysis considers the likelihood of receiving all contractual principal and interest. For securities reclassified out of the trading category in the fourth quarter of 2008, the analysis considers the likelihood of receiving the expected principal and interest cash flows anticipated as of the date of reclassification in the fourth quarter of 2008. The extent of the Company's analysis regarding credit quality and the stress on assumptions used in the analysis have been refined for securities where the current fair value or other characteristics of the security warrant. The paragraphs below describe the Company's process for identifying credit impairment in security types with the most significant unrealized losses as of June 30, 2010.

    122


    Mortgage-backed securities

            For U.S. mortgage-backed securities (and in particular for Alt-A and other mortgage-backed securities that have significant unrealized losses as a percentage of amortized cost), credit impairment is assessed using a cash flow model that estimates the cash flows on the underlying mortgages, using the security-specific collateral and transaction structure. The model estimates cash flows from the underlying mortgage loans and distributes those cash flows to various tranches of securities, considering the transaction structure and any subordination and credit enhancements that exist in that structure. The cash flow model incorporates actual cash flows on the mortgage-backed securities through the current period and then projects the remaining cash flows using a number of assumptions, including default rates, prepayment rates, and recovery rates (on foreclosed properties).

            Management develops specific assumptions using as much market data as possible and includes internal estimates as well as estimates published by rating agencies and other third-party sources. Default rates are projected by considering current underlying mortgage loan performance, generally assuming the default of (1) 10% of current loans, (2) 25% of 30-59 day delinquent loans, (3) 70% of 60-90 day delinquent loans and (4) 100% of 91+ day delinquent loans. These estimates are extrapolated along a default timing curve to estimate the total lifetime pool default rate. Other assumptions used contemplate the actual collateral attributes, including geographic concentrations, rating agency loss projections, rating actions and current market prices.

            The key assumptions for mortgage-backed securities as of June 30, 2010 are in the table below:

     
     June 30, 2010  

    Prepayment rate

       3-8 CRR 

    Loss severity(1)

       45%–75% 

    Unemployment rate

       9.8% 
        

    (1)
    Loss severity rates are estimated considering collateral characteristics and generally range from 45%-55% for prime bonds, 50%-75% for Alt-A bonds, and 65%-75% for subprime bonds.

            The valuation as of June 30, 2010 assumes that U.S. housing prices are unchanged for the remainder of 2010, increase 0.6% in 2011, increase 1.4% in 2012, increase 2.2% in 2013 and increase 3% per year from 2014 onwards.

            In addition, cash flow projections are developed using more stressful parameters, and management assesses the results of those stress tests (including the severity of any cash shortfall indicated and the likelihood of the stress scenarios actually occurring based on the underlying pool's characteristics and performance) to assess whether management expects to recover the amortized cost basis of the security. If cash flow projections indicate that the Company does not expect to recover its amortized cost basis, the Company recognizes the estimated credit loss in earnings.

    State and municipal securities

            Citigroup's AFS state and municipal bonds consist mainly of bonds that are financed through Tender Option Bond programs. The process for identifying credit impairment for bonds in this program as well as for bonds that were previously financed in this program is largely based on third-party credit ratings. Individual bond positions must meet minimum ratings requirements, which vary based on the sector of the bond issuer.

            Citigroup monitors the bond issuer and insurer ratings on a daily basis. The average portfolio rating, ignoring any insurance, is Aa3/AA-. In the event of a downgrade of the bond below the Aa3/AA-, the subject bond is specifically reviewed for potential shortfall in contractual principal and interest. Citigroup has not recorded any credit impairments on bonds held as part of the Tender Option Bond program or on bonds that were previously held as part of the Tender Option Bond program.

            The remainder of Citigroup's AFS state and municipal bonds, outside of the above, are specifically reviewed for credit impairment based on instrument-specific estimates of cash flows, probability of default and loss given default.

    Recognition and Measurement of OTTI

            The following table presents the total OTTI recognized in earnings during the three months and six months ended June 30, 2010:

    OTTI on Investments  Three months ended June 30, 2010  Six months ended June 30, 2010  
    In millions of dollars AFS  HTM  Total  AFS  HTM  Total  

    Impairment losses related to securities which the Company does not intend to sell nor will likely be required to sell:

                       

    Total OTTI losses recognized during the periods ended June 30, 2010

      $39  $217  $256  $236  $549  $785 

    Less: portion of OTTI loss recognized in AOCI (before taxes)

       3     3   6   40   46 
                  

    Net impairment losses recognized in earnings for securities that the Company does not intend to sell nor will likely be required to sell

      $36  $217  $253  $230  $509  $739 

    OTTI losses recognized in earnings for securities that the Company intends to sell or more-likely-than-not will be required to sell before recovery

       201     201   222     222 
                  

    Total impairment losses recognized in earnings

      $237  $217  $454  $452  $509  $961 
                  

    123


            The following is a 3-month roll-forward of the credit-related position recognized in earnings for AFS and HTM debt securities held as of June 30, 2010:

     
     Cumulative OTTI Credit Losses Recognized in Earnings  
    In millions of dollars March 31, 2010
    balance
     Credit impairments
    recognized in
    earnings on
    securities not
    previously impaired
     Credit impairments
    recognized in
    earnings on
    securities that have
    been previously
    impaired
     Reductions due to
    sales of credit
    impaired
    securities sold or
    matured
     June 30, 2010
    balance
     

    AFS debt securities

                    

    Mortgage-backed securities

                    
     

    Prime

     $254 $ $26 $ $280 
     

    Alt-A

      2        2 
     

    Commercial real estate

      2        2 
                
     

    Total mortgage-backed securities

     $258 $ $26 $ $284 

    State and municipal

        3      3 

    U.S. Treasury

      35  1      36 

    Foreign government

      154  5      159 

    Corporate

      146  1      147 

    Asset-backed securities

      9        9 

    Other debt securities

      52        52 
                

    Total OTTI credit losses recognized for AFS debt securities

     $654 $10 $26 $ $690 
                

    HTM debt securities

                    

    Mortgage-backed securities

                    
     

    Prime

     $246 $51 $ $ $297 
     

    Alt-A

      2,749  131  6    2,886 
     

    Subprime

      213        213 
     

    Non-U.S. residential

      96        96 
     

    Commercial real estate

      9  1      10 
                
     

    Total mortgage-backed securities

     $3,313 $183 $6 $ $3,502 

    State and municipal

      7        7 

    Corporate

      351        351 

    Asset-backed securities

      81  8  19    108 

    Other debt securities

      4    1    5 
                

    Total OTTI credit losses recognized for HTM debt securities

     $3,756 $191 $26 $ $3,973 
                

    124


            The following is a 6-month roll-forward of the credit-related position recognized in earnings for AFS and HTM debt securities held as of June 30, 2010:

     
     Cumulative OTTI Credit Losses Recognized in Earnings  
    In millions of dollars  December 31, 2009
    balance
     Credit impairments
    recognized in
    earnings on
    securities not
    previously impaired
     Credit impairments
    recognized in
    earnings on
    securities that have
    been previously
    impaired
     Reductions due to
    sales of credit
    impaired
    securities sold or
    matured
     June 30, 2010
    balance
     

    AFS debt securities

                    

    Mortgage-backed securities

                    
     

    Prime

     $242 $12 $26 $ $280 
     

    Alt-A

      1  1      2 
     

    Commercial real estate

      2        2 
                
     

    Total mortgage-backed securities

     $245 $13 $26 $ $284 

    State and municipal

        3      3 

    U.S. Treasury

        36      36 

    Foreign government

      20  139      159 

    Corporate

      137  5  5    147 

    Asset-backed securities

      9        9 

    Other debt securities

      49  3      52 
                

    Total OTTI credit losses recognized for AFS debt securities

     $460 $199 $31 $ $690 
                

    HTM debt securities

                    

    Mortgage-backed securities

                    
     

    Prime

     $170 $126 $1 $ $297 
     

    Alt-A

      2,569  309  8    2,886 
     

    Subprime

      210  1  2    213 
     

    Non-U.S. residential

      96        96 
     

    Commercial real estate

      9  1      10 
                
     

    Total mortgage-backed securities

     $3,054 $437 $11 $ $3,502 

    State and municipal

      7        7 

    Corporate

      351        351 

    Asset-backed securities

      48  41  19    108 

    Other debt securities

      4    1    5 
                

    Total OTTI credit losses recognized for HTM debt securities

     $3,464 $478 $31 $ $3,973 
                

    125


    Investments in Alternative Investment Funds that Calculate Net Asset Value per Share

            The Company holds investments in certain alternative investment funds that calculate net asset value (NAV) per share, including hedge funds, private equity funds, fund of funds and real estate funds. The Company's investments include co-investments in funds that are managed by the Company and investments in funds that are managed by third parties. Investments in funds are generally classified as non-marketable equity securities carried at fair value.

            The fair values of these investments are estimated using the NAV per share of the Company's ownership interest in the funds, where it is not probable that the Company will sell an investment at a price other than NAV.

    In millions of dollars at June 30, 2010  Fair
    value
     Unfunded commitments  Redemption frequency
    (if currently eligible)
     Redemption notice
    period
     

    Hedge funds

      $1,044  $16   Monthly, quarterly, annually   10-95 days 

    Private equity funds(1)(2)

       3,721   1,828     

    Real estate funds(3)

       373   188     
              

    Total

      $5,138(4) $2,032       
              

    (1)
    Includes investments in private equity funds of $749 million for which the Company has entered into an agreement to sell, where fair value has been measured at the estimated transaction price. Also includes investments in private equity funds carried at cost with a carrying value of $268 million.

    (2)
    Private equity funds include funds that invest in infrastructure, leveraged buyout transactions, emerging markets and venture capital.

    (3)
    This category includes several real estate funds that invest primarily in commercial real estate in the U.S., Europe and Asia. These investments can never be redeemed with the funds. Distributions from each fund will be received as the underlying investments in the funds are liquidated. It is estimated that the underlying assets of the fund will be liquidated over a period of several years as market conditions allow. While certain assets within the portfolio may be sold, no specific assets have been identified for sale. Because it is not probable that any individual investment will be sold, the fair value of each individual investment has been estimated using the NAV of the Company's ownership interest in the partners' capital. There is no standard redemption frequency nor is a prior notice period required. The investee fund's management must approve of the buyer before the sale of the investments can be completed.

    (4)
    Includes $1.7 billion of funds where the NAV is provided by third party asset managers.

    126



    11.    GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS

    Goodwill

            The changes in Goodwill during the first six months of 2010 were as follows:

    In millions of dollars 

    Balance at December 31, 2009

      $25,392 
        

    Foreign exchange translation

       294 

    Smaller acquisitions/divestitures, purchase accounting adjustments and other

       (24)
        

    Balance at March 31, 2010

      $25,662 
        

    Foreign exchange translation

       (442)

    Smaller acquisitions/divestitures, purchase accounting adjustments and other

       (19)
        

    Balance at June 30, 2010

      $25,201 
        

            During the first six months of 2010, no goodwill was written off due to impairment. Goodwill is tested for impairment annually during the third quarter at the reporting unit level and between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. During the second quarter, the Company reviewed the current conditions for all of its reporting units and determined that an interim goodwill impairment test was required for its Brokerage and Asset Management and Local Consumer Lending—Cards reporting units. The valuations were updated for these particular businesses and the results of the review showed no goodwill impairment for these reporting units or any of the other reporting units as of June 30, 2010. Additionally, the fair value of the Asia Regional Consumer Banking, Securities and Banking and Transaction Services reporting units substantially exceeded their respective carrying value.

            Citigroup engaged the services of an independent valuation specialist to assist in the updated valuation of its Local Consumer Lending—Cards reporting unit, which considered the impact of the recent penalty fee provision associated with the Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009 (CARD Act). The fair value as a percentage of allocated book value for Local Consumer Lending—Cards and Brokerage and Asset Management is 115% and 105%, respectively. If economic conditions deteriorate or other events adversely impact the business models and the related assumptions including the discount rate, expected recovery, and expected loss rates used to value this reporting unit, the Company could potentially experience future impairment charges with respect to the $4,593 million and $65 million of goodwill remaining in its Local Consumer Lending—Cards and Brokerage and Asset Management reporting units. Any such charges, by themselves, would not negatively affect the Company's Tier 1 Common, Tier 1 Capital or Total Capital regulatory ratios, its Tangible Common Equity or the Company's liquidity position. The Company will continue to monitor these reporting units as the goodwill in these reporting units may be particularly sensitive to further deterioration in economic conditions.

            The following tables present the Company's goodwill balances by reporting unit and by segment at June 30, 2010:

    In millions of dollars  
    Reporting unit(1)  Goodwill  

    North America Regional Consumer Banking

     $2,465 

    EMEA Regional Consumer Banking

      284 

    Asia Regional Consumer Banking

      5,638 

    Latin America Regional Consumer Banking

      1,683 

    Securities and Banking

      8,926 

    Transaction Services

      1,547 

    Brokerage and Asset Management

      65 

    Local Consumer Lending—Cards

      4,593 
        

    Total

      $25,201 
        

    By Segment

        

    Regional Consumer Banking

     $10,070 

    Institutional Clients Group

      10,473 

    Citi Holdings

      4,658 
        

    Total

      $25,201 
        

    (1)
    Local Consumer Lending—Other is excluded from the table as there is no goodwill allocated to it.

    127


    Intangible Assets

            The components of intangible assets were as follows:

     
     June 30, 2010  December 31, 2009  
    In millions of dollars Gross
    carrying
    amount
     Accumulated
    amortization
     Net
    carrying
    amount
     Gross
    carrying
    amount
     Accumulated
    amortization
     Net
    carrying
    amount
     

    Purchased credit card relationships

      $7,915  $4,950  $2,965  $8,148  $4,838  $3,310 

    Core deposit intangibles

       1,402   875   527   1,373   791   582 

    Other customer relationships

       677   185   492   675   176   499 

    Present value of future profits

       239   107   132   418   280   138 

    Indefinite-lived intangible assets

       522     522   569     569 

    Other(1)

       4,722   1,492   3,230   4,977   1,361   3,616 
                  

    Intangible assets (excluding MSRs)

      $15,477  $7,609  $7,868  $16,160  $7,446  $8,714 

    MSRs

       4,894     4,894   6,530     6,530 
                  

    Total intangible assets

      $20,371  $7,609  $12,762  $22,690  $7,446  $15,244 
                  

    (1)
    Includes contract-related intangible assets.

            The changes in intangible assets during the first six months of 2010 were as follows:

    In millions of dollars Net carrying
    amount at
    December 31,
    2009
     Acquisitions/
    divestitures
     Amortization  Impairments  FX
    and
    other(1)
     Net carrying
    amount at
    June 30,
    2010
     

    Purchased credit card relationships

      $3,310  $(53) $(251) $(39) $(2) $2,965 

    Core deposit intangibles

       582     (55)      527 

    Other customer relationships

       499     (27)    20   492 

    Present value of future profits

       138     (7)    1   132 

    Indefinite-lived intangible assets

       569   (46)      (1)  522 

    Other

       3,616     (158)  (32)  (196)  3,230 
                  

    Intangible assets (excluding MSRs)

      $8,714  $(99) $(498) $(71) $(178) $7,868 

    MSRs(2)

       6,530               4,894 
                      

    Total intangible assets

      $15,244              $12,762 
                      

    (1)
    Includes foreign exchange translation and purchase accounting adjustments.

    (2)
    See Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the roll-forward of MSRs.

    128



    12.    DEBT

    Short-Term Borrowings

            Short-term borrowings consist of commercial paper and other borrowings as follows:

    In millions of dollars June 30,
    2010
     December 31,
    2009
     

    Commercial paper

           

    Bank

      $25,170  $ 

    Other Non-bank

       11,193   10,223 

      $36,363  $10,223 

    Other short-term borrowings(1)

       56,389   58,656 
          

    Total short-term borrowings(2)

      $92,752  $68,879 
          

    (1)
    At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, collateralized advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank were $12 billion and $23 billion, respectively.

    (2)
    June 30, 2010 includes $25.2 billion of commercial paper related to VIEs consolidated effective January 1, 2010 with the adoption of SFAS 166/167.

            Borrowings under bank lines of credit may be at interest rates based on LIBOR, CD rates, the prime rate or bids submitted by the banks. Citigroup pays commitment fees for its lines of credit.

            Some of Citigroup's non-bank subsidiaries have credit facilities with Citigroup's subsidiary depository institutions, including Citibank, N.A. Borrowings under these facilities must be secured in accordance with Section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act.

            Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc. (CGMHI) has substantial borrowing agreements consisting of facilities that CGMHI has been advised are available, but where no contractual lending obligation exists. These arrangements are reviewed on an ongoing basis to ensure flexibility in meeting CGMHI's short-term requirements.


    Long-Term Debt

    In millions of dollars  June 30,
    2010
     December 31,
    2009
     

    Citigroup parent company

      $189,110  $197,804 

    Bank

       148,531   78,857 

    Other Non-bank

       75,656   87,358 
          

    Total long-term debt(1)(2)(3)

      $413,297  $364,019 
          

    (1)
    At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, collateralized advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank were $18.6 billion and $24.1 billion, respectively.

    (2)
    Includes Principal-Protected Trust Securities (Safety First Trust Securities) with carrying values of $451 million issued by Safety First Trust Series 2006-1, 2007-1, 2007-2, 2007-3, 2007-4, 2008-1, 2008-2, 2008-3, 2008-4, 2008-5, 2008-6, 2009-1, 2009-2, and 2009-3 (collectively, the "Safety First Trusts") at June 30, 2010 and $528 million issued by Safety First Trust Series 2006-1, 2007-1, 2007-2, 2007-3, 2007-4, 2008-1, 2008-2, 2008-3, 2008-4, 2008-5, 2008-6, 2009-1, 2009-2, and 2009-3 at December 31, 2009. CFI owns all of the voting securities of the Safety First Trusts. The Safety First Trusts have no assets, operations, revenues or cash flows other than those related to the issuance, administration and repayment of the Safety First Trust Securities and the Safety First Trusts' common securities. The Safety First Trusts' obligations under the Safety First Trust Securities are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by CFI, and CFI's guarantee obligations are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Citigroup.

    (3)
    June 30, 2010 includes $101.0 billion related to VIEs consolidated effective January 1, 2010 with the adoption of SFAS 166/167.

            CGMHI has committed long-term financing facilities with unaffiliated banks. At June 30, 2010, CGMHI had drawn down the full $900 million available under these facilities, of which $150 million is guaranteed by Citigroup. Generally, a bank can terminate these facilities by giving CGMHI one-year prior notice.

            The Company issues both fixed and variable rate debt in a range of currencies. It uses derivative contracts, primarily interest rate swaps, to effectively convert a portion of its fixed rate debt to variable rate debt and variable rate debt to fixed rate debt. The maturity structure of the derivatives generally corresponds to the maturity structure of the debt being hedged. In addition, the Company uses other derivative contracts to manage the impact of FX translation on certain debt issuances.

            Long-term debt at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 includes $20.2 billion and $19.3 billion, respectively, of junior subordinated debt. The Company formed statutory business trusts under the laws of the state of Delaware. The trusts exist for the exclusive purposes of (1) issuing trust securities representing undivided beneficial interests in the assets of the trust; (2) investing the gross proceeds of the trust securities in junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures (subordinated debentures) of its parent; and (3) engaging in only those activities necessary or incidental thereto. Upon approval from the Federal Reserve Board, Citigroup has the right to redeem these securities.

            Citigroup has contractually agreed not to redeem or purchase (i) the 6.50% Enhanced Trust Preferred Securities of Citigroup Capital XV before September 15, 2056, (ii) the 6.45% Enhanced Trust Preferred Securities of Citigroup Capital XVI before December 31, 2046, (iii) the 6.35% Enhanced Trust Preferred Securities of Citigroup Capital XVII before March 15, 2057, (iv) the 6.829% Fixed Rate/Floating Rate Enhanced Trust Preferred Securities of Citigroup Capital XVIII before June 28, 2047, (v) the 7.250% Enhanced Trust Preferred Securities of Citigroup Capital XIX before August 15, 2047, (vi) the 7.875% Enhanced Trust Preferred Securities of Citigroup Capital XX before December 15, 2067, and (vii) the 8.300% Fixed Rate/Floating Rate Enhanced Trust Preferred Securities of Citigroup Capital XXI before December 21, 2067, unless certain conditions, described in Exhibit 4.03 to Citigroup's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 18, 2006, in Exhibit 4.02 to Citigroup's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 28, 2006, in Exhibit 4.02 to Citigroup's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 8, 2007, in Exhibit 4.02 to Citigroup's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 2, 2007, in Exhibit 4.02 to Citigroup's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 17, 2007, in Exhibit 4.2 to Citigroup's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 27, 2007, and in Exhibit 4.2 to Citigroup's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 21, 2007, respectively, are met. These agreements are for the benefit of the holders of Citigroup's 6.00% Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debentures due 2034.

    129


            Citigroup owns all of the voting securities of these subsidiary trusts. These subsidiary trusts have no assets, operations, revenues or cash flows other than those related to the issuance, administration and repayment of the subsidiary trusts and the subsidiary trusts' common securities. These subsidiary trusts' obligations are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Citigroup.

            The following table summarizes the financial structure of each of the Company's subsidiary trusts at June 30, 2010:

     
      
      
      
      
      
     Junior subordinated debentures
    owned by trust
     
    Trust securities with distributions guaranteed byCitigroup
    In millions of dollars, except share amounts
     Issuance
    date
     Securities
    issued
     Liquidation
    value
     Coupon
    rate
     Common
    shares issued
    to parent
     Amount(1)  Maturity  Redeemable
    by issuer
    beginning
     

    Citigroup Capital III

      Dec. 1996  194,053 $194  7.625% 6,003 $200  Dec. 1, 2036  Not redeemable 

    Citigroup Capital VII

      July 2001  35,885,898  897  7.125% 1,109,874  925  July 31, 2031  July 31, 2006 

    Citigroup Capital VIII

      Sept. 2001  43,651,597  1,091  6.950% 1,350,050  1,125  Sept. 15, 2031  Sept. 17, 2006 

    Citigroup Capital IX

      Feb. 2003  33,874,813  847  6.000% 1,047,675  873  Feb. 14, 2033  Feb. 13, 2008 

    Citigroup Capital X

      Sept. 2003  14,757,823  369  6.100% 456,428  380  Sept. 30, 2033  Sept. 30, 2008 

    Citigroup Capital XI

      Sept. 2004  18,387,128  460  6.000% 568,675  474  Sept. 27, 2034  Sept. 27, 2009 

    Citigroup Capital XII

      Mar. 2010  92,000,000  2,300  8.500% 25  2,300  Mar. 30, 2040  Mar. 30, 2015 

    Citigroup Capital XIV

      June 2006  12,227,281  306  6.875% 40,000  307  June 30, 2066  June 30, 2011 

    Citigroup Capital XV

      Sept. 2006  25,210,733  630  6.500% 40,000  631  Sept. 15, 2066  Sept. 15, 2011 

    Citigroup Capital XVI

      Nov. 2006  38,148,947  954  6.450% 20,000  954  Dec. 31, 2066  Dec. 31, 2011 

    Citigroup Capital XVII

      Mar. 2007  28,047,927  701  6.350% 20,000  702  Mar. 15, 2067  Mar. 15, 2012 

    Citigroup Capital XVIII

      June 2007  99,901  150  6.829% 50  150  June 28, 2067  June 28, 2017 

    Citigroup Capital XIX

      Aug. 2007  22,771,968  569  7.250% 20,000  570  Aug. 15, 2067  Aug. 15, 2012 

    Citigroup Capital XX

      Nov. 2007  17,709,814  443  7.875% 20,000  443  Dec. 15, 2067  Dec. 15, 2012 

    Citigroup Capital XXI

      Dec. 2007  2,345,801  2,346  8.300% 500  2,346  Dec. 21, 2077  Dec. 21, 2037 

    Citigroup Capital XXXI

      Nov. 2007  1,875,000  1,875  6.700% 10  1,875  Mar. 15, 2042  Mar. 15, 2014 

    Citigroup Capital XXXII

      Nov. 2007  1,875,000  1,875  6.935% 10  1,875  Sept. 15, 2042  Sept. 15, 2014 

    Citigroup Capital XXXIII

      July 2009  5,259,000  5,259  8.000% 100  5,259  July 30, 2039  July 30, 2014 

    Adam Capital Trust III

      Dec. 2002  17,500  18  3 mo. LIB
    +335 bp.
      542  18  Jan. 7, 2033  Jan. 7, 2008 

    Adam Statutory Trust III

      Dec. 2002  25,000  25  3 mo. LIB
    +325 bp.
      774  26  Dec. 26, 2032  Dec. 26, 2007 

    Adam Statutory Trust IV

      Sept. 2003  40,000  40  3 mo. LIB
    +295 bp.
      1,238  41  Sept. 17, 2033  Sept. 17, 2008 

    Adam Statutory Trust V

      Mar. 2004  35,000  35  3 mo. LIB
    +279 bp.
      1,083  36  Mar. 17, 2034  Mar. 17, 2009 
                            

    Total obligated

            $21,384        $21,510       
                            

    (1)
    Represents the proceeds received from the Trust at the date of issuance.

            In each case, the coupon rate on the debentures is the same as that on the trust securities. Distributions on the trust securities and interest on the debentures are payable quarterly, except for Citigroup Capital III, Citigroup Capital XVIII and Citigroup Capital XXI, on which distributions are payable semiannually.

            During the second quarter of 2010 Citigroup exchanged Citigroup Capital Trust XXX for $1.875 billion of senior notes with a coupon of 6% payable semi-annually. The senior notes mature on December 13, 2013.

    130



    13.    CHANGES IN ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

            The following table shows the changes in each component of "Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)" for the first and second quarters of 2010:

    In millions of dollars Net unrealized
    gains (losses) on
    investment
    securities
     Foreign
    currency
    translation
    adjustment,
    net of hedges
     Cash flow
    hedges
     Pension
    liability
    adjustments
     Accumulated other
    comprehensive
    income (loss)
     

    Balance, December 31, 2009

      $(4,347) $(7,947) $(3,182) $(3,461) $(18,937)

    Change in net unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities, net of taxes

      1,210        1,210 

    Reclassification adjustment for net gains included in net income, net of taxes

      (28)       (28)

    Foreign currency translation adjustment, net of taxes(1)

        (279)     (279)

    Cash flow hedges, net of taxes(2)

          223    223 

    Pension liability adjustment, net of taxes(3)

            (48) (48)
                

    Change

     $1,182 $(279)$223 $(48)$1,078 
                

    Balance, March 31, 2010

      $(3,165) $(8,226) $(2,959) $(3,509) $(17,859)

    Change in net unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities, net of taxes(4)

      967        967 

    Reclassification adjustment for net gains included in net income, net of taxes

      (61)       (61)

    Foreign currency translation adjustment, net of taxes(1)

        (2,036)     (2,036)

    Cash flow hedges, net of taxes(2)

          (225)   (225)

    Pension liability adjustment, net of taxes(3)

            44  44 
                

    Change

     $906 $(2,036)$(225)$44 $(1,311)
                

    Balance, June 30, 2010

      $(2,259) $(10,262) $(3,184) $(3,465) $(19,170)
                

    (1)
    Primarily impacted by the movements in the British pound, Euro, Japanese yen, Korean won and Mexican peso against the U.S. dollar, and changes in related tax effects and hedges.

    (2)
    Primarily driven by Citigroup's pay fixed/receive floating interest rate swap programs that are hedging the floating rates on deposits and long-term debt.

    (3)
    Reflects adjustments to the funded status of pension and postretirement plans, which is the difference between the fair value of the plan assets and the projected benefit obligation.

    (4)
    Primarily impacted by increases in unrealized gains on mortgage-backed and U.S. treasury securities, partially offset by higher unrealized losses on state and municipal securities. See Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements

    131



    14.    SECURITIZATIONS AND VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES

    Overview

            Citigroup and its subsidiaries are involved with several types of off-balance sheet arrangements, including special purpose entities (SPEs). See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of changes to the accounting for transfers and servicing of financial assets and consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (VIEs), including the elimination of Qualifying SPEs (QSPEs).

    Uses of SPEs

            An SPE is an entity designed to fulfill a specific limited need of the company that organized it. The principal uses of SPEs are to obtain liquidity and favorable capital treatment by securitizing certain of Citigroup's financial assets, to assist clients in securitizing their financial assets, and to create investment products for clients. SPEs may be organized in many legal forms including trusts, partnerships or corporations. In a securitization, the company transferring assets to an SPE converts all (or a portion) of those assets into cash before they would have been realized in the normal course of business, through the SPE's issuance of debt and equity instruments, certificates, commercial paper and other notes of indebtedness, which are recorded on the balance sheet of the SPE and not reflected in the transferring company's balance sheet, assuming applicable accounting requirements are satisfied. Investors usually have recourse to the assets in the SPE and often benefit from other credit enhancements, such as a collateral account or over-collateralization in the form of excess assets in the SPE, a line of credit, or from a liquidity facility, such as a liquidity put option or asset purchase agreement. The SPE can typically obtain a more favorable credit rating from rating agencies than the transferor could obtain for its own debt issuances, resulting in less expensive financing costs than unsecured debt. The SPE may also enter into derivative contracts in order to convert the yield or currency of the underlying assets to match the needs of the SPE investors or to limit or change the credit risk of the SPE. Citigroup may be the provider of certain credit enhancements as well as the counterparty to any related derivative contracts. Since QSPEs were eliminated, most of Citigroup's SPEs are now VIEs.

    Variable Interest Entities

            VIEs are entities that have either a total equity investment that is insufficient to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support or whose equity investors lack the characteristics of a controlling financial interest (i.e., ability to make significant decisions through voting rights, and right to receive the expected residual returns of the entity or obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity). Investors that finance the VIE through debt or equity interests or other counterparties that provide other forms of support, such as guarantees, subordinated fee arrangements, or certain types of derivative contracts, are variable interest holders in the entity. Since January 1, 2010, the variable interest holder, if any, that has a controlling financial interest in a VIE is deemed to be the primary beneficiary and must consolidate the VIE. Citigroup would be deemed to have a controlling financial interest if it has both of the following characteristics:

      1.
      Power to direct activities of a VIE that most significantly impact the entity's economic performance; and

      2.
      Obligation to absorb losses of the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE or right to receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE.

            The Company must evaluate its involvement in each VIE and understand the purpose and design of the entity, the role the Company had in the entity's design, and its involvement in its ongoing activities. The Company then must evaluate which activities most significantly impact the economic performance of the VIE and who has the power to direct such activities.

            For those VIEs where the Company determines that it has the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the VIE's economic performance, the Company then must evaluate its economic interests, if any, and determine whether it could absorb losses or receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the VIE. When evaluating whether the Company has an obligation to absorb losses that could potentially be significant, it considers the maximum exposure to such loss without consideration of probability. Such obligations could be in various forms, including but not limited to, debt and equity investments, guarantees, liquidity agreements, and certain derivative contracts.

            Prior to January 1, 2010, the variable interest holder, if any, that would absorb a majority of the entity's expected losses, receive a majority of the entity's residual returns or both was deemed to be the primary beneficiary and consolidated the VIE. Consolidation of the VIE was determined based primarily on the variability generated in scenarios that are considered most likely to occur, rather than on scenarios that are considered more remote. In many cases, a detailed quantitative analysis was required to make this determination.

            In various other transactions, the Company may act as a derivative counterparty (for example, interest rate swap, cross-currency swap, or purchaser of credit protection under a credit default swap or total return swap where the Company pays the total return on certain assets to the SPE); may act as underwriter or placement agent; may provide administrative, trustee, or other services; or may make a market in debt securities or other instruments issued by VIEs. The Company generally considers such involvement, by itself, not to be variable interests and thus not an indicator of power or potentially significant benefits or losses.

    132


            Citigroup's involvement with consolidated and unconsolidated VIEs with which the Company holds significant variable interests as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 is presented below:

    As of June 30, 2010  
     
      
      
      
     Maximum exposure to loss in significant unconsolidated VIEs(1)  
     
      
      
      
     Funded exposures(2)  Unfunded exposures(3)  Total  
     
     Total
    involvement
    with SPE
    assets
      
      
     
    In millions of dollars Consolidated
    VIE / SPE
    assets(4)
     Significant
    unconsolidated
    VIE assets(4)(5)
     Debt
    investments
     Equity
    investments
     Funding
    commitments
     Guarantees
    and
    derivatives
     Total  

    Citicorp

                             

    Credit card securitizations

      $64,560  $64,560  $  $  $  $  $  $ 

    Mortgage securitizations(6)

       175,625   2,100   173,525   1,937       30   1,967 

    Citi-administered asset-backed commercial paper conduits (ABCP)

       29,066   21,483   7,583       7,583     7,583 

    Third-party commercial paper conduits

       4,275     4,275   259     342     601 

    Collateralized debt obligations (CDOs)

       5,762     5,762   132         132 

    Collateralized loan obligations (CLOs)

       7,392     7,392   86         86 

    Asset-based financing

       26,037   1,218   24,819   7,362   12   1,144   13   8,531 

    Municipal securities tender option bond trusts (TOBs)

       19,761   10,306   9,455       6,408   588   6,996 

    Municipal investments

       12,673   241   12,432   750   2,409   545     3,704 

    Client intermediation

       6,280   1,170   5,110   1,583   8       1,591 

    Investment funds

       3,479   124   3,355   2   48       50 

    Trust preferred securities

       21,627     21,627     128       128 

    Other

       5,625   863   4,762   759     119   241   1,119 
                      

    Total

      $382,162  $102,065  $280,097  $12,870  $2,605  $16,141  $872  $32,488 
                      

    Citi Holdings

                             

    Credit card securitizations

      $35,511  $35,511  $  $  $  $  $  $ 

    Mortgage securitizations(6)

       278,462   3,719   274,743   2,777       119   2,896 

    Student loan securitizations

       35,081   35,081             

    Auto loan securitizations

       2,196   2,196             

    Citi-administered asset-backed commercial paper conduits (ABCP)

       100   100             

    Third-party commercial paper conduits

       3,282     3,282       252     252 

    Collateralized debt obligations (CDOs)

       9,372   709   8,663   389       143   532 

    Collateralized loan obligations (CLOs)

       14,209   490   13,719   1,503     59   371   1,933 

    Asset-based financing

       46,634   3   46,631   14,680   4   925     15,609 

    Municipal securities tender option bond trusts (TOBs)

       631   631             

    Municipal investments

       4,638     4,638   124   195   124     443 

    Client intermediation

       696   215   481   62       347   409 

    Investment funds

       4,731   1,138   3,593     83   403     486 

    Other

       2,166   483   1,683   215   118   181     514 
                      

    Total

      $437,709  $80,276  $357,433  $19,750  $400  $1,944  $980  $23,074 
                      

    Total Citigroup

      $819,871  $182,341  $637,530  $32,620  $3,005  $18,085  $1,852  $55,562 
                      

    (1)
    The definition of maximum exposure to loss is included in the text that follows.

    (2)
    Included in Citigroup's June 30, 2010 Consolidated Balance Sheet.

    (3)
    Not included in Citigroup's June 30, 2010 Consolidated Balance Sheet.

    (4)
    Due to the adoption of ASC 810, Consolidation (formerly FASB Interpretation No. 46(R), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities) on January 1, 2010, the previously disclosed assets of former QSPEs are now included in either the "Consolidated VIE / SPE assets" or the "Significant unconsolidated VIE assets" columns for the June 30, 2010 period.

    (5)
    A significant unconsolidated VIE is an entity where the Company has any variable interest considered to be significant, regardless of the likelihood of loss or the notional amount of exposure.

    (6)
    A significant portion of the Company's securitized mortgage portfolio was transferred from Citi Holdings to Citicorp during the first quarter of 2010.

    133


     
      
      
      
     As of December 31, 2009  
    In millions of dollars Total
    involvement
    with SPE assets
     QSPE
    assets
     Consolidated
    VIE assets
     Significant
    unconsolidated
    VIE assets(1)
     Maximum exposure to
    loss in significant
    unconsolidated VIEs(2)
     

    Citicorp

                    

    Credit card securitizations

     $78,833 $78,833 $ $ $ 

    Mortgage securitizations

      264,949  264,949       

    Citi-administered asset-backed commercial paper conduits (ABCP)

      36,327      36,327  36,326 

    Third-party commercial paper conduits

      3,718      3,718  353 

    Collateralized debt obligations (CDOs)

      2,785      2,785  21 

    Collateralized loan obligations (CLOs)

      5,409      5,409  120 

    Asset-based financing

      19,612    1,279  18,333  5,221 

    Municipal securities tender option bond trusts (TOBs)

      19,455  705  9,623  9,127  6,841 

    Municipal investments

      10,906    11  10,895  2,370 

    Client intermediation

      8,607    2,749  5,858  881 

    Investment funds

      93    39  54  10 

    Trust preferred securities

      19,345      19,345  128 

    Other

      7,380  1,808  1,838  3,734  446 
                

    Total

     $477,419 $346,295 $15,539 $115,585 $52,717 
                

    Citi Holdings

                    

    Credit card securitizations

     $42,274 $42,274 $ $ $ 

    Mortgage securitizations

      308,504  308,504       

    Student loan securitizations

      14,343  14,343       

    Citi-administered asset-backed commercial paper conduits (ABCP)

      98    98     

    Third-party commercial paper conduits

      5,776      5,776  439 

    Collateralized debt obligations (CDOs)

      24,157    7,614  16,543  1,158 

    Collateralized loan obligations (CLOs)

      13,515    142  13,373  1,658 

    Asset-based financing

      52,598    370  52,228  18,385 

    Municipal securities tender option bond trusts (TOBs)

      1,999    1,999     

    Municipal investments

      5,364    882  4,482  375 

    Client intermediation

      675    230  445  396 

    Investment funds

      10,178    1,037  9,141  268 

    Other

      3,732  610  1,472  1,650  604 
                

    Total

     $483,213 $365,731 $13,844 $103,638 $23,283 
                

    Total Citigroup

     $960,632 $712,026 $29,383 $219,223 $76,000 
                

    (1)
    A significant unconsolidated VIE is an entity where the Company has any variable interest considered to be significant, regardless of the likelihood of loss or the notional amount of exposure.

    (2)
    The definition of maximum exposure to loss is included in the text that follows.

    Reclassified to conform to the current period's presentation.

    134


            The previous table does not include:

      certain venture capital investments made by some of the Company's private equity subsidiaries, as the Company accounts for these investments in accordance with the Investment Company Audit Guide;

      certain limited partnerships that are investment funds that qualify for the deferral from the requirements of SFAS 167 where the Company is the general partner and the limited partners have the right to replace the general partner or liquidate the funds;

      certain investment funds for which the Company provides investment management services and personal estate trusts for which the Company provides administrative, trustee and/or investment management services;

      VIEs structured by third parties where the Company holds securities in inventory. These investments are made on arm's-length terms; and

      certain positions in mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities held by the Company, which are classified as Trading account assets or Investments, where the Company has no other involvement with the related securitization entity. For more information on these positions, please see Notes 9 and 10 to the consolidated financial statements.

            Prior to January 1, 2010, the table did not include:

      assets transferred to a VIE where the transfer did not qualify as a sale and where the Company did not have any other involvement that is deemed to be a variable interest with the VIE. These transfers are accounted for as secured borrowings by the Company.

            The asset balances for consolidated VIEs represent the carrying amounts of the assets consolidated by the Company. The carrying amount may represent the amortized cost or the current fair value of the assets depending on the legal form of the asset (e.g., security or loan) and the Company's standard accounting policies for the asset type and line of business.

            The asset balances for unconsolidated VIEs where the Company has significant involvement represent the most current information available to the Company. In most cases, the asset balances represent an amortized cost basis without regard to impairments in fair value, unless fair value information is readily available to the Company. For VIEs that obtain asset exposures synthetically through derivative instruments (for example, synthetic CDOs), the table includes the full original notional amount of the derivative as an asset.

            The maximum funded exposure represents the balance sheet carrying amount of the Company's investment in the VIE. It reflects the initial amount of cash invested in the VIE plus any accrued interest and is adjusted for any impairments in value recognized in earnings and any cash principal payments received. The maximum exposure of unfunded positions represents the remaining undrawn committed amount, including liquidity and credit facilities provided by the Company, or the notional amount of a derivative instrument considered to be a variable interest, adjusted for any declines in fair value recognized in earnings. In certain transactions, the Company has entered into derivative instruments or other arrangements that are not considered variable interests in the VIE (e.g., interest rate swaps, cross-currency swaps, or where the Company is the purchaser of credit protection under a credit default swap or total return swap where the Company pays the total return on certain assets to the SPE). Receivables under such arrangements are not included in the maximum exposure amounts.

    Funding Commitments for Significant Unconsolidated VIEs—Liquidity Facilities and Loan Commitments

            The following table presents the notional amount of liquidity facilities and loan commitments that are classified as funding commitments in the SPE table as of June 30, 2010:

    In millions of dollars Liquidity Facilities  Loan Commitments  

    Citicorp

           

    Citi-administered asset-backed commercial paper conduits (ABCP)

      $7,583  $ 

    Third-party commercial paper conduits

       342   

    Asset-based financing

       5   1,139 

    Municipal securities tender option bond trusts (TOBs)

       6,408   

    Municipal investments

         545 

    Other

         119 
          

    Total Citicorp

      $14,338  $1,803 
          

    Citi Holdings

           

    Third-party commercial paper conduits

      $252  $ 

    Collateralized loan obligations (CLOs)

         59 

    Asset-based financing

         925 

    Municipal investments

         124 

    Investment Funds

       15   388 

    Other

         181 
          

    Total Citi Holdings

      $267  $1,677 
          

    Total Citigroup funding commitments

      $14,605  $3,480 
          

    135


    Citicorp & Citi Holdings Consolidated VIEs

            The following table presents the carrying amounts and classifications of consolidated assets that are collateral for consolidated VIE and SPE obligations.

            The Company engages in on-balance-sheet securitizations which are securitizations that do not qualify for sales treatment; thus, the assets remain on the Company's balance sheet. The consolidated VIEs included in the tables below represent hundreds of separate entities with which the Company is involved. In general, the third-party investors in the obligations of consolidated VIEs have legal recourse only to the assets of the VIEs and do not have such recourse to the Company, except where the Company has provided a guarantee to the investors or is the counterparty to certain derivative transactions involving the VIE. In addition, the assets are generally restricted only to pay such liabilities. Thus, the Company's maximum legal exposure to loss related to consolidated VIEs is significantly less than the carrying value of the consolidated VIE assets due to outstanding third-party financing. Intercompany assets and liabilities are excluded from the table. All assets are restricted from being sold or pledged as collateral. The cash flows from these assets are the only source used to pay down the associated liabilities, which are non-recourse to the Company's general assets.

     
     June 30, 2010  December 31, 2009  
    In billions of dollars Citicorp  Citi Holdings  Citigroup  Citicorp  Citi Holdings  Citigroup  

    Cash

      $0.8  $1.9  $2.7  $  $1.4  $1.4 

    Trading account assets

       2.1   2.1   4.2   3.7   9.5   13.2 

    Investments

       10.5   0.7   11.2   9.8   2.8   12.6 

    Total loans, net

       86.8   72.4   159.2   0.1   25.0   25.1 

    Other

       1.8   3.2   5.0   1.9   1.3   3.2 
                  

    Total assets

      $102.0  $80.3  $182.3  $15.5  $40.0  $55.5 
                  

    Short-term borrowings

      $35.0  $2.3  $37.3  $9.5  $2.6  $12.1 

    Long-term debt

       49.7   51.3   101.0   4.6   21.2   25.8 

    Other liabilities

       1.7   3.0   4.7   0.1   3.6   3.7 
                  

    Total liabilities

      $86.4  $56.6  $143.0  $14.2  $27.4  $41.6 
                  

    Citicorp & Citi Holdings Significant Interests in Unconsolidated VIEs—Balance Sheet Classification

            The following tables present the carrying amounts and classification of significant interests in unconsolidated VIEs:

     
     June 30, 2010  December 31, 2009  
    In billions of dollars Citicorp  Citi Holdings  Citigroup  Citicorp  Citi Holdings  Citigroup  

    Trading account assets

      $4.1  $2.9  $7.0  $3.2  $3.1  $6.3 

    Investments

       2.9   6.9   9.8   2.0   7.3   9.3 

    Loans

       6.0   8.8   14.8   2.3   10.5   12.8 

    Other

       2.4   2.4   4.8   0.5   0.1   0.6 
                  

    Total assets

      $15.4  $21.0  $36.4  $8.0  $21.0  $29.0 
                  

    Long-term debt

      $0.5  $  $0.5  $0.5  $  $0.5 

    Other liabilities

       0.4     0.4   0.3   0.2   0.5 
                  

    Total liabilities

      $0.9  $  $0.9  $0.8  $0.2  $1.0 
                  

    136


    Credit Card Securitizations

            The Company securitizes credit card receivables through trusts that are established to purchase the receivables. Citigroup transfers receivables into the trusts on a non-recourse basis. Credit card securitizations are revolving securitizations; that is, as customers pay their credit card balances, the cash proceeds are used to purchase new receivables and replenish the receivables in the trust. Prior to 2010, such transfers were accounted for as sale transactions under SFAS 140 and, accordingly, the sold assets were removed from the consolidated balance sheet and a gain or loss was recognized in connection with the transaction. With the adoption of SFAS 166 and SFAS 167, beginning in 2010 the trusts are treated as consolidated entities, because, as servicer, Citigroup has power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the trusts and also holds a seller's interest and certain securities issued by the trusts, and provides liquidity facilities to the trusts, which could result in potentially significant losses or benefits from the trusts. Accordingly, the transferred credit card receivables are required to remain on the Consolidated Balance Sheet with no gain or loss recognized. The debt issued by the trusts to third parties is included in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

            The Company relies on securitizations to fund a significant portion of its credit card businesses in North America. The following table reflects amounts related to the Company's securitized credit card receivables:

     
     Citicorp  Citi Holdings  
    In billions of dollars June 30,
    2010
     December 31,
    2009
     June 30,
    2010
     December 31,
    2009
     

    Principal amount of credit card receivables in trusts

      $70.8  $78.8  $36.5  $42.3 
              

    Ownership interests in principal amount of trust credit card receivables

                 
     

    Sold to investors via trust-issued securities

       49.1   66.5   18.2   28.2 
     

    Retained by Citigroup as trust-issued securities

       4.4   5.0   7.6   10.1 
     

    Retained by Citigroup via non-certificated interests

       17.3   7.3   10.7   4.0 
              

    Total ownership interests in principal amount of trust credit card receivables

      $70.8  $78.8  $36.5  $42.3 
              

    Other amounts recorded on the balance sheet related to interests retained in the trusts

                 
     

    Other retained interests in securitized assets

       NA  $1.4   NA  $1.6 
     

    Residual interest in securitized assets(1)

       NA   0.3   NA   1.2 
     

    Amounts payable to trusts

       NA   1.2   NA   0.8 
              

    (1)
    December 31, 2009 balances include net unbilled interest of $0.3 billion for Citicorp and $0.4 billion for Citi Holdings.

    Credit Card Securitizations—Citicorp

            The Company recorded net gains (losses) from securitization of credit card receivables of $51 million and $151 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2009. Net gains (losses) reflect the following:

      incremental gains (losses) from new securitizations;

      the reversal of the allowance for loan losses associated with receivables sold;

      net gains on replenishments of the trust assets offset by other-than-temporary impairments; and

      changes in fair value for the portion of the residual interest classified as trading assets.

    137


            The following table summarizes selected cash flow information related to Citicorp's credit card securitizations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009:

     
     Three months ended
    June 30,
     
    In billions of dollars 2010  2009  

    Proceeds from new securitizations

      $  $5.9 

    Pay down of maturing notes

       (6.9)  N/A 

    Proceeds from collections reinvested in new receivables

       N/A   36.1 

    Contractual servicing fees received

       N/A   0.3 

    Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows

       N/A   0.7 
          

    N/A—Not applicable due to the adoption of SFAS 166/167

     
     Six months ended
    June 30,
     
    In billions of dollars 2010  2009  

    Proceeds from new securitizations

      $  $10.6 

    Pay down of maturing notes

       (17.4)  N/A 

    Proceeds from collections reinvested in new receivables

       N/A   71.5 

    Contractual servicing fees received

       N/A   0.6 

    Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows

       N/A   1.6 
          

    N/A—Not applicable due to the adoption of SFAS 166/167

    Managed Loans

            As previously mentioned, prior to 2010, securitized receivables were treated as sold and removed from the balance sheet. Beginning in 2010, all securitized credit card receivables are included in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Accordingly, the Managed-basis (Managed) presentation is only relevant prior to 2010.

            After securitization of credit card receivables, the Company continues to maintain credit card customer account relationships and provides servicing for receivables transferred to the trusts. As a result, the Company considers the securitized credit card receivables to be part of the business it manages.

            Managed-basis presentations are non-GAAP financial measures. Managed presentations include results from both the on-balance-sheet loans and off-balance-sheet loans, and exclude the impact of card securitization activity. Managed presentations assume that securitized loans have not been sold and present the results of the securitized loans in the same manner as Citigroup's owned loans. Citigroup's management believes that Managed presentations provide a greater understanding of ongoing operations and enhance comparability of those results in prior periods as well as demonstrating the effects of unusual gains and charges in the current period. Management further believes that a meaningful analysis of the Company's financial performance requires an understanding of the factors underlying that performance and that investors find it useful to see these non-GAAP financial measures to analyze financial performance without the impact of unusual items that may obscure trends in Citigroup's underlying performance.

    Managed Loans—Citicorp

            The following tables present a reconciliation between the Managed basis and on-balance-sheet credit card portfolios and the related delinquencies (loans which are 90 days or more past due) and credit losses, net of recoveries.

    In millions of dollars, except loans in billions June 30,
    2010
     December 31,
    2009
     

    Loan amounts, at period end

           

    On balance sheet

      $109.5  $44.8 

    Securitized amounts

         72.6 
          

    Total managed loans

      $109.5  $117.4 
          

    Delinquencies, at period end

           

    On balance sheet

      $2,690  $1,165 

    Securitized amounts

         2,121 
          

    Total managed delinquencies

      $2,690  $3,286 
          

     

    Credit losses, net of recoveries, for the
    three months ended June 30,
     2010  2009  

    On balance sheet

      $2,620  $978 

    Securitized amounts

         1,838 
          

    Total managed

      $2,620  $2,816 
          

     

    Credit losses, net of recoveries, for the
    six months ended June 30,
     2010  2009  

    On balance sheet

      $5,368  $1,815 

    Securitized amounts

         3,329 
          

    Total managed

      $5,368  $5,144 
          

    Credit Card SecuritizationsCiti Holdings

            The Company recorded net losses from securitization of Citi Holdings' credit card receivables of $(612) million and $(676) million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009.

            The following table summarizes selected cash flow information related to Citi Holdings' credit card securitizations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009:

     
     Three months ended
    June 30,
     
    In billions of dollars 2010  2009  

    Proceeds from new securitizations

      $2.1  $10.6 

    Pay down of maturing notes

       (4.0)  N/A 

    Proceeds from collections reinvested in new receivables

       N/A   13.6 

    Contractual servicing fees received

       N/A   0.2 

    Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows

       N/A   0.6 
          

    N/A—Not applicable due to the adoption of SFAS 166/167

     
     Six months ended
    June 30,
     
    In billions of dollars 2010  2009  

    Proceeds from new securitizations

      $3.8  $18.7 

    Pay down of maturing notes

       (13.8)  N/A 

    Proceeds from collections reinvested in new receivables

       N/A   25.8 

    Contractual servicing fees received

       N/A   0.4 

    Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows

       N/A   1.2 
          

    N/A—Not applicable due to the adoption of SFAS 166/167

    138


    Managed Loans—Citi Holdings

            The following tables present a reconciliation between the Managed basis and on-balance-sheet credit card portfolios and the related delinquencies (loans which are 90 days or more past due) and credit losses, net of recoveries.

    In millions of dollars, except loans in billions June 30,
    2010
     December 31,
    2009
     

    Loan amounts, at period end

           

    On balance sheet

      $56.6  $27.0 

    Securitized amounts

         38.8 
          

    Total managed loans

      $56.6  $65.8 
          

    Delinquencies, at period end

           

    On balance sheet

      $1,895  $1,250 

    Securitized amounts

         1,326 
          

    Total managed delinquencies

      $1,895  $2,576 
          

     

    Credit losses, net of recoveries, for the
    three months ended June 30,
     2010  2009  

    On balance sheet

      $1,951  $1,155 

    Securitized amounts

         1,277 
          

    Total managed credit losses

      $1,951  $2,432 
          

     

    Credit losses, net of recoveries, for the
    six months ended June 30,
     2010  2009  

    On balance sheet

      $4,077  $2,260 

    Securitized amounts

         2,335 
          

    Total managed credit losses

      $4,077  $4,595 
          

    Funding, Liquidity Facilities and Subordinated Interests

            Citigroup securitizes credit card receivables through three securitization trusts—Citibank Credit Card Master Trust ("Master Trust"), which is part of Citicorp, and the Citibank OMNI Master Trust ("Omni Trust") and Broadway Credit Card Trust ("Broadway Trust"), which are part of Citi Holdings.

            Master Trust issues fixed- and floating-rate term notes as well as commercial paper. Some of the term notes are issued to multi-seller commercial paper conduits. In 2009, the Master Trust issued $4.3 billion of notes that are eligible for the Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility (TALF) program, where investors can borrow from the Federal Reserve using the trust securities as collateral. The weighted average maturity of the term notes issued by the Master Trust was 3.7 years as of June 30, 2010 and 3.6 years as of December 31, 2009. Beginning in 2010, the liabilities of the trusts are included in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

    Master Trust liabilities (at par value)

    In billions of dollars June 30,
    2010
     December 31,
    2009
     

    Term notes issued to multi- seller CP conduits

      $0.2  $0.8 

    Term notes issued to third parties

       43.9   51.2 

    Term notes retained by Citigroup affiliates

       4.4   5.0 

    Commercial paper

       5.0   14.5 
          

    Total Master Trust liabilities

      $53.5  $71.5 
          

            Both Omni and Broadway Trusts issue fixed- and floating-rate term notes, some of which are purchased by multi-seller commercial paper conduits. The Omni Trust also issues commercial paper. During 2009, a portion of the Omni Trust commercial paper had been purchased by the Federal Reserve's Commercial Paper Funding Facility (CPFF). In addition, some of the multi-seller conduits that hold Omni Trust term notes had placed commercial paper with CPFF. No Omni trust liabilities were funded through CPFF as of June 30, 2010. The total amount of Omni Trust liabilities funded directly or indirectly through the CPFF was $2.5 billion at December 31, 2009.

            The weighted average maturity of the third-party term notes issued by the Omni Trust was 2.2 years as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009. The weighted average maturity of the third-party term notes issued by the Broadway Trust was 2.0 years as of June 30, 2010 and 2.5 years as of December 31, 2009.

    Omni Trust liabilities (at par value)

    In billions of dollars June 30,
    2010
     December 31,
    2009
     

    Term notes issued to multi- seller commercial paper conduits

      $7.4  $13.1 

    Term notes issued to third parties

       9.2   9.2 

    Term notes retained by Citigroup affiliates

       7.4   9.8 

    Commercial paper

         4.4 
          

    Total Omni Trust liabilities

      $24.0  $36.5 
          

    Broadway Trust liabilities (at par value)

    In billions of dollars June 30,
    2010
     December 31,
    2009
     

    Term notes issued to multi-seller commercial paper conduits

      $0.5  $0.5 

    Term notes issued to third parties

       1.0   1.0 

    Term notes retained by Citigroup affiliates

       0.3   0.3 
          

    Total Broadway Trust liabilities

      $1.8  $1.8 
          

            Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. is the sole provider of full liquidity facilities to the commercial paper programs of the Master and Omni Trusts. Both of these facilities, which represent contractual obligations on the part of Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. to provide liquidity for the issued commercial paper, are made available on market terms to each of the trusts. The liquidity facilities require Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. to purchase the commercial paper issued by each trust at maturity, if the commercial paper does not roll over, as long as there are available credit enhancements outstanding, typically in the form of subordinated notes. As there was no Omni trust commercial paper outstanding as of June 30, 2010, there was no liquidity commitment at that time. The liquidity commitment related to the Omni Trust commercial paper programs amounted to $4.4 billion at December 31, 2009. The liquidity commitment related to the Master Trust commercial paper program amounted to $5.0

    139


    billion at June 30, 2010 and $14.5 billion at December 31, 2009. As of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, none of the Master Trust liquidity commitment was drawn.

            In addition, Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. had provided liquidity to a third-party, non-consolidated multi-seller commercial paper conduit, which is not a VIE. The commercial paper conduit had acquired notes issued by the Omni Trust. The liquidity commitment to the third-party conduit was $2.5 billion at December 31, 2009, of which none was drawn.

            During 2009, all three of Citigroup's primary credit card securitization trusts—Master Trust, Omni Trust, and Broadway Trust—had bonds placed on ratings watch with negative implications by rating agencies. As a result of the ratings watch status, certain actions were taken by Citi with respect to each of the trusts. In general, the actions subordinated certain senior interests in the trust assets that were retained by Citi, which effectively placed these interests below investor interests in terms of priority of payment.

            As a result of these actions, based on the applicable regulatory capital rules, Citigroup began including the sold assets for all three of the credit card securitization trusts in its risk-weighted assets for purposes of calculating its risk-based capital ratios during 2009. The increase in risk-weighted assets occurred in the quarter during 2009 in which the respective actions took place. The effect of these changes increased Citigroup's risk-weighted assets by approximately $82 billion, and decreased Citigroup's Tier 1 Capital ratio by approximately 100 basis points each as of March 31, 2009, with respect to the Master and Omni Trusts. The inclusion of the Broadway Trust increased Citigroup's risk-weighted assets by an additional approximately $900 million at June 30, 2009. With the consolidation of the trusts, beginning in 2010 the credit card receivables that had previously been considered sold under SFAS 140 are now included in the Consolidated Balance Sheet and accordingly these assets continue to be included in Citigroup's risk-weighted assets. All bond ratings for each of the trusts have been affirmed by the rating agencies and no downgrades have occurred as of June 30, 2010.

    Mortgage Securitizations

            The Company provides a wide range of mortgage loan products to a diverse customer base.

            Once originated, the Company often securitizes these loans through the use of SPEs, which prior to 2010 were QSPEs. These SPEs are funded through the issuance of Trust Certificates backed solely by the transferred assets. These certificates have the same average life as the transferred assets. In addition to providing a source of liquidity and less expensive funding, securitizing these assets also reduces the Company's credit exposure to the borrowers. These mortgage loan securitizations are primarily non-recourse, thereby effectively transferring the risk of future credit losses to the purchasers of the securities issued by the trust. However, the Company's Consumer business generally retains the servicing rights and in certain instances retains investment securities, interest-only strips and residual interests in future cash flows from the trusts. Securities and Banking and Special Asset Poolretain servicing for a limited number of their mortgage securitizations.

            The Company securitizes mortgage loans generally through either a government-sponsored agency, such as Ginnie Mae, FNMA or Freddie Mac (U.S. agency—sponsored mortgages), or private label (Non-agency-sponsored mortgages) securitization. The Company is not the primary beneficiary of its U.S. agency-sponsored mortgage securitizations, because Citigroup does not have the power to direct the activities of the SPE that most significantly impact the entity's economic performance. Therefore, Citi does not consolidate these U.S. agency-sponsored mortgage securitizations. In certain instances, the Company has (1) the power to direct the activities and (2) the obligation to either absorb losses or right to receive benefits that could be potentially significant to its non-agency-sponsored mortgage securitizations and therefore, is the primary beneficiary and consolidates the SPE.

    Mortgage SecuritizationsCiticorp

            The following tables summarize selected cash flow information related to mortgage securitizations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009:

     
     Three months ended June 30,  
     
     2010  2009  
    In billions of dollars U.S. agency-
    sponsored
    mortgages
     Non-agency-
    sponsored
    mortgages
     Agency- and non-agency-
    sponsored
    mortgages
     

    Proceeds from new securitizations

      $11.4  $0.6  $5.6 

    Contractual servicing fees received

       0.1     

    Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows

           
            

     

     
     Six months ended June 30,  
     
     2010  2009  
    In billions of dollars U.S. agency-
    sponsored
    mortgages
     Non-agency-
    sponsored
    mortgages
     Agency- and non-agency-
    sponsored
    mortgages
     

    Proceeds from new securitizations

      $23.2  $1.1  $6.9 

    Contractual servicing fees received

       0.3     

    Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows

           
            

    140


            Gains (losses) recognized on the securitization of U.S. agency-sponsored mortgages were $1 million and $4 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, losses recognized on the securitization of non-agency-sponsored mortgages were $(2) million and $(1) million, respectively.

            Agency and non-agency mortgage securitization losses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 were $(15) million and $(11) million, respectively.

            Key assumptions used in measuring the fair value of retained interests at the date of sale or securitization of mortgage receivables for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 are as follows:

     
     June 30, 2010  June 30, 2009
     
     U.S. agency-
    sponsored
    mortgages
     Non-agency-
    sponsored
    mortgages
     Agency- and non-agency-
    sponsored mortgages

    Discount rate

      0.9% to 37.4%  2.4% to 39.8%  0.7% to 39.3%

    Constant prepayment rate

      3.7% to 25.0%  3.0% to 5.0%  3.0% to 45.5%

    Anticipated net credit losses

      NM  40.0% to 75.0%  0.0% to 80.0%
           

    NM    Not meaningful. Anticipated net credit losses are not meaningful due to U.S. agency guarantees.

            The range in the key assumptions is due to the different characteristics of the interests retained by the Company. The interests retained range from highly rated and/or senior in the capital structure to unrated and/or residual interests.

            The effect of adverse changes of 10% and 20% in each of the key assumptions used to determine the fair value of retained interests is disclosed below. The negative effect of each change is calculated independently, holding all other assumptions constant. Because the key assumptions may not in fact be independent, the net effect of simultaneous adverse changes in the key assumptions may be less than the sum of the individual effects shown below.

    141


            At June 30, 2010, the key assumptions used to value retained interests and the sensitivity of the fair value to adverse changes of 10% and 20% in each of the key assumptions were as follows:

     
     June 30, 2010
     
     U.S. agency-
    sponsored
    mortgages
     Non-agency-
    sponsored
    mortgages

    Discount rate

      0.9% to 37.4%  2.4% to 39.8%

    Constant prepayment rate

      3.7% to 25.0%  3.0% to 25.8%

    Anticipated net credit losses

      NM  40.0% to 75.0%
         

    NM    Not meaningful. Anticipated net credit losses are not meaningful due to U.S. agency guarantees.

    In millions of dollars U.S. agency-
    sponsored
    mortgages
     Non-agency-
    sponsored
    mortgages
     

    Carrying value of retained interests

      $2,514  $730 
          

    Discount rates

           
     

    Adverse change of 10%

      $(70) $(19)
     

    Adverse change of 20%

       (136)  (38)
          

    Constant prepayment rate

           
     

    Adverse change of 10%

      $(130) $(15)
     

    Adverse change of 20%

       (251)  (28)
          

    Anticipated net credit losses

           
     

    Adverse change of 10%

      $(1) $(44)
     

    Adverse change of 20%

       (2)  (80)
          

    Mortgage Securitizations—Citi Holdings

            The following tables summarize selected cash flow information related to Citi Holdings mortgage securitizations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009:

     
     Three months ended June 30,  
     
     2010  2009  
    In billions of dollars U.S. agency-
    sponsored
    mortgages
     Non-agency-
    sponsored
    mortgages
     Agency- and Non-agency-
    sponsored
    mortgages
     

    Proceeds from new securitizations

      $  $  $25.0 

    Contractual servicing fees received

       0.2   0.1   0.3 

    Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows

       0.1     0.1 
            

     

     
     Six months ended June 30,  
     
     2010  2009  
    In billions of dollars U.S. agency-
    sponsored
    mortgages
     Non-agency-
    sponsored
    mortgages
     Agency- and Non-agency-
    sponsored
    Mortgages
     

    Proceeds from new securitizations

      $  $  $45.1 

    Contractual servicing fees received

       0.4   0.1   0.7 

    Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows

       0.1     0.3 
            

            The Company did not recognize gains (losses) on the securitization of U.S. agency- and non-agency-sponsored mortgages in the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.

            Key assumptions used in measuring the fair value of retained interests at the date of sale or securitization of mortgage receivables for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 are as follows:

     
     Three months ended June 30,
     
     2010  2009
     
     U.S. agency-
    sponsored
    mortgages
     Non-agency-
    sponsored
    mortgages
     Agency- and Non-agency-
    sponsored
    mortgages

    Discount rate

      N/A  N/A  7.9% to 8.6%

    Constant prepayment rate

      N/A  N/A  2.8% to 5.1%

    Anticipated net credit losses

      N/A  N/A 
           

    N/A    Not applicable

    142


            The range in the key assumptions is due to the different characteristics of the interests retained by the Company. The interests retained range from highly rated and/or senior in the capital structure to unrated and/or residual interests.

            The effect of adverse changes of 10% and 20% in each of the key assumptions used to determine the fair value of retained interests is disclosed below. The negative effect of each change is calculated independently, holding all other assumptions constant. Because the key assumptions may not in fact be independent, the net effect of simultaneous adverse changes in the key assumptions may be less than the sum of the individual effects shown below.

            At June 30, 2010, the key assumptions used to value retained interests and the sensitivity of the fair value to adverse changes of 10% and 20% in each of the key assumptions were as follows:

     
     June 30, 2010
     
     U.S. agency-
    sponsored mortgages
     Non-agency-
    sponsored mortgages

    Discount rate

      12.8%  2.4% to 39.8%

    Constant prepayment rate

      24.6%  5.0% to 23.2%

    Anticipated net credit losses

      NM  0.1% to 70.0%

    Weighted average life

      5.0 years  5.2 years
         

     

    In millions of dollars U.S. agency-
    sponsored mortgages
     Non-agency-
    sponsored mortgages
     

    Carrying value of retained interests

      $2,662  $541 
          

    Discount rates

           
     

    Adverse change of 10%

      $(96) $(27)
     

    Adverse change of 20%

       (186)  (53)
          

    Constant prepayment rate

           
     

    Adverse change of 10%

      $(215) $(43)
     

    Adverse change of 20%

       (412)  (82)
          

    Anticipated net credit losses

           
     

    Adverse change of 10%

      $(7) $(40)
     

    Adverse change of 20%

       (14)  (76)
          

    NM    Not meaningful. Anticipated net credit losses are not meaningful due to U.S. agency guarantees.

    Mortgage Servicing Rights

            In connection with the securitization of mortgage loans, the Company's U.S. Consumer mortgage business retains the servicing rights, which entitle the Company to a future stream of cash flows based on the outstanding principal balances of the loans and the contractual servicing fee. Failure to service the loans in accordance with contractual requirements may lead to a termination of the servicing rights and the loss of future servicing fees.

            The fair value of capitalized mortgage servicing rights (MSRs) was $4.9 billion and $6.7 billion at June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The MSRs correspond to principal loan balances of $509 billion and $586 billion as of June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The following table summarizes the changes in capitalized MSRs for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009:

     
     Three months ended
    June 30,
     
    In millions of dollars 2010  2009  

    Balance, as of March 31

      $6,439  $5,481 

    Originations

       117   391 

    Changes in fair value of MSRs due to changes in inputs and assumptions

       (1,384)  1,343 

    Other changes(1)

       (278)  (445)
          

    Balance, as of June 30

      $4,894  $6,770 
          

     

     
     Six months ended
    June 30,
     
    In millions of dollars 2010  2009  

    Balance, as of the beginning of year

      $6,530  $5,657 

    Originations

       269   626 

    Changes in fair value of MSRs due to changes in inputs and assumptions

       (1,294)  1,517 

    Other changes(1)

       (611)  (1,030)
          

    Balance, as of June 30

      $4,894  $6,770 
          

    (1)
    Represents changes due to customer payments and passage of time.

            The market for MSRs is not sufficiently liquid to provide participants with quoted market prices. Therefore, the Company uses an option-adjusted spread valuation approach to determine the fair value of MSRs. This approach consists of projecting servicing cash flows under multiple interest rate scenarios and discounting these cash flows using risk-adjusted discount rates. The key assumptions used in the valuation of MSRs include mortgage prepayment speeds and discount rates. The model assumptions and the MSRs' fair value estimates are compared to observable trades of similar MSR portfolios and interest-only security portfolios, as available, as well as to MSR broker valuations and industry surveys. The cash flow model and underlying prepayment and interest rate models used to value these MSRs are subject to validation in accordance with the Company's model validation policies.

            The fair value of the MSRs is primarily affected by changes in prepayments that result from shifts in mortgage interest rates. In managing this risk, the Company economically hedges a significant portion of the value of its MSRs through the use of interest rate derivative contracts, forward purchase commitments of mortgage-backed securities and purchased securities classified as trading.

            The Company receives fees during the course of servicing previously securitized mortgages. The amounts of these fees for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 were as follows:

     
     Three months ended
    June 30,
     Six months ended
    June 30,
     
    In millions of dollars 2010  2009  2010  2009  

    Servicing fees

      $344  $429  $713  $858 

    Late fees

       21   23   44   48 

    Ancillary fees

       53   22   92   42 
              

    Total MSR fees

      $418  $474  $849  $948 
              

            These fees are classified in the Consolidated Statement of Income as Commissions and fees.

    143


    Student Loan Securitizations

            The Company indirectly owns, through Citibank, N.A., 80% of the outstanding common stock of The Student Loan Corporation (SLC), which is located within Citi Holdings—Local Consumer Lending. Through this business, the Company maintains programs to securitize certain portfolios of student loan assets. Under these securitization programs, loans are sold to VIEs (some of them being former QSPEs), which are funded through the issuance of pass-through term notes collateralized solely by the trust assets.

            The Company has (1) the power to direct the activities of these VIEs that most significantly impact their economic performance and (2) the obligation to either absorb losses or the right to receive benefits that could be potentially significant to the VIEs.

            As a result of the adoption of SFAS 166 and SFAS 167, the Company consolidated all student loan trusts that were formerly QSPEs, as well as newly created securitization VIEs, as the primary beneficiary. Prior to the adoption of SFAS 166 and SFAS 167, the student loan securitizations through QSPEs were accounted for as off-balance-sheet securitizations, with the Company generally retaining interests in the form of subordinated residual interests (i.e., interest only strips) and servicing rights.

            Under terms of the trust arrangements, the Company has no obligation to provide financial support and has not provided such support. A substantial portion of the credit risk associated with the securitized loans has been transferred to third-party guarantors or insurers either under the Federal Family Education Loan Program (FFEL Program), authorized by the U.S. Department of Education under the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended, or through private credit insurance. On March 30, 2010, the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 was signed into law, which eliminated new FFEL Program loan originations. Effective July 1, 2010, in compliance with this regulatory change, SLC ceased originating new FFEL Program loans. This change is not currently anticipated to materially impact the Company's financial statements.

            The following tables summarize selected cash flow information related to student loan securitizations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009:

     
     Three months ended
    June 30,
     
    In billions of dollars 2010  2009  

    Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows

     $ $ 
          

     

     
     Six months ended
    June 30,
     
    In billions of dollars 2010  2009  

    Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows

     $ $0.1 
          

    Citi-Administered Asset-Backed Commercial Paper Conduits

            The Company is active in the asset-backed commercial paper conduit business as administrator of several multi-seller commercial paper conduits, and also as a service provider to single-seller and other commercial paper conduits sponsored by third parties.

            The multi-seller commercial paper conduits are designed to provide the Company's clients access to low-cost funding in the commercial paper markets. The conduits purchase assets from or provide financing facilities to clients and are funded by issuing commercial paper to third-party investors. The conduits generally do not purchase assets originated by the Company. The funding of the conduit is facilitated by the liquidity support and credit enhancements provided by the Company.

            As administrator to the conduits, the Company is generally responsible for selecting and structuring assets purchased or financed by the conduits, making decisions regarding the funding of the conduits, including determining the tenor and other features of the commercial paper issued, monitoring the quality and performance of the conduits' assets, and facilitating the operations and cash flows of the conduits. In return, the Company earns structuring fees from customers for individual transactions and earns an administration fee from the conduit, which is equal to the income from client program and liquidity fees of the conduit after payment of interest costs and other fees. This administration fee is fairly stable, since most risks and rewards of the underlying assets are passed back to the clients and, once the asset pricing is negotiated, most ongoing income, costs and fees are relatively stable as a percentage of the conduit's size.

            The conduits administered by the Company do not generally invest in liquid securities that are formally rated by third parties. The assets are privately negotiated and structured transactions that are designed to be held by the conduit, rather than actively traded and sold. The yield earned by the conduit on each asset is generally tied to the rate on the commercial paper issued by the conduit, thus passing interest rate risk to the client. Each asset purchased by the conduit is structured with transaction-specific credit enhancement features provided by the third-party client seller, including over collateralization, cash and excess spread collateral accounts, direct recourse or third-party guarantees. These credit enhancements are sized with the objective of approximating a credit rating of A or above, based on the Company's internal risk ratings.

            Substantially all of the funding of the conduits is in the form of short-term commercial paper, with a weighted average life generally ranging from 30 to 45 days. As of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the weighted average lives of the commercial paper issued by consolidated and unconsolidated conduits were approximately 37 days and 43 days, respectively.

            The primary credit enhancement provided to the conduit investors is in the form of transaction-specific credit enhancement described above. In addition, there are generally two additional forms of credit enhancement that protect the commercial paper investors from defaulting assets. First, the subordinate loss notes issued by each conduit absorb any credit losses up to their full notional amount. Second, each conduit has obtained a letter of credit from the Company, which is generally 8-10% of the conduit's assets. The letters of credit provided by the Company to the consolidated conduits total approximately $3.4 billion. The net result across all multi-seller conduits administered by the Company is that, in the event defaulted assets exceed the transaction-specific credit enhancement described above, any losses in each conduit are allocated in the following order:

      subordinate loss note holders,

      the Company, and

    144


      the commercial paper investors.

            The Company also provides the conduits with two forms of liquidity agreements that are used to provide funding to the conduits in the event of a market disruption, among other events. Each asset of the conduit is supported by a transaction-specific liquidity facility in the form of an asset purchase agreement (APA). Under the APA, the Company has agreed to purchase non-defaulted eligible receivables from the conduit at par. Any assets purchased under the APA are subject to increased pricing. The APA is not designed to provide credit support to the conduit, as it generally does not permit the purchase of defaulted or impaired assets and generally reprices the assets purchased to consider potential increased credit risk. The APA covers all assets in the conduits and is considered in the Company's maximum exposure to loss. In addition, the Company provides the conduits with program-wide liquidity in the form of short-term lending commitments. Under these commitments, the Company has agreed to lend to the conduits in the event of a short-term disruption in the commercial paper market, subject to specified conditions. The total notional exposure under the program-wide liquidity agreement for the Company's unconsolidated administered conduit as of June 30, 2010, is $0.6 billion and is considered in the Company's maximum exposure to loss. The Company receives fees for providing both types of liquidity agreement and considers these fees to be on fair market terms.

            Finally, the Company is one of several named dealers in the commercial paper issued by the conduits and earns a market-based fee for providing such services. Along with third-party dealers, the Company makes a market in the commercial paper and may from time to time fund commercial paper pending sale to a third party. On specific dates with less liquidity in the market, the Company may hold in inventory commercial paper issued by conduits administered by the Company, as well as conduits administered by third parties. The amount of commercial paper issued by its administered conduits held in inventory fluctuates based on market conditions and activity. As of June 30, 2010, the Company owned none of the commercial paper issued by its unconsolidated administered conduit.

            Upon adoption of SFAS 167 on January 1, 2010, with the exception of the government-guaranteed loan conduit described below, the asset-backed commercial paper conduits were consolidated by the Company. The Company determined that through its role as administrator it had the power to direct the activities that most significantly impacted the entities' economic performance. These powers included its ability to structure and approve the assets purchased by the conduits, its ongoing surveillance and credit mitigation activities, and its liability management. In addition, as a result of all the Company's involvement described above, it was concluded that the Company had an economic interest that could potentially be significant. However, the assets and liabilities of the Conduits are separate and apart from those of Citigroup. No assets of any Conduit are available to satisfy the creditors of Citigroup or any of its other subsidiaries.

            The Company administers one conduit that originates loans to third-party borrowers and those obligations are fully guaranteed primarily by AAA-rated government agencies that support export and development financing programs. The economic performance of this government-guaranteed loan conduit is most significantly impacted by the performance of its underlying assets. The guarantors must approve each loan held by the entity and the guarantors have the ability (through establishment of the servicing terms to direct default mitigation and to purchase defaulted loans) to manage the conduit's loans that become delinquent to improve the economic performance of the conduit. Because the Company does not have the power to direct the activities of this government-guaranteed loan conduit that most significantly impact the economic performance of the entity, it was concluded that the Company should not consolidate the entity. As of June 30, 2010, this unconsolidated government-guaranteed loan conduit held assets of approximately $7.6 billion.

            Prior to January 1, 2010, the Company was required to analyze the expected variability of the conduit quantitatively to determine whether the Company is the primary beneficiary of the conduit. The Company performed this analysis on a quarterly basis. For conduits where the subordinate loss notes or third-party guarantees were sufficient to absorb a majority of the expected loss of the conduit, the Company did not consolidate. In circumstances where the subordinate loss notes or third-party guarantees were insufficient to absorb a majority of the expected loss, the Company consolidated the conduit as its primary beneficiary due to the additional credit enhancement provided by the Company. In conducting this analysis, the Company considers three primary sources of variability in the conduit: credit risk, interest rate risk and fee variability.

    Third-Party Commercial Paper Conduits

            The Company also provides liquidity facilities to single- and multi-seller conduits sponsored by third parties. These conduits are independently owned and managed and invest in a variety of asset classes, depending on the nature of the conduit. The facilities provided by the Company typically represent a small portion of the total liquidity facilities obtained by each conduit, and are collateralized by the assets of each conduit. As of June 30, 2010, the notional amount of these facilities was approximately $853 million, of which $259 million was funded under these facilities. The Company is not the party that has the power to direct the activities of these conduits that most significantly impact their economic performance and thus does not consolidate them.

    Collateralized Debt and Loan Obligations

            A securitized collateralized debt obligation (CDO) is an SPE that purchases a pool of assets consisting of asset-backed securities and synthetic exposures through derivatives on asset-backed securities and issues multiple tranches of equity and notes to investors. A third-party asset manager is typically retained by the CDO to select the pool of assets and manage those assets over the term of the CDO. The Company earns fees for warehousing assets prior to the creation of a CDO, structuring CDOs and placing debt securities with investors. In addition, the Company has retained interests in many of the CDOs it has structured and makes a market in those issued notes.

            A cash CDO, or arbitrage CDO, is a CDO designed to take advantage of the difference between the yield on a portfolio of selected assets, typically residential mortgage-backed securities, and the cost of funding the CDO through the sale of notes to investors. "Cash flow" CDOs are vehicles in which the CDO

    145


    passes on cash flows from a pool of assets, while "market value" CDOs pay to investors the market value of the pool of assets owned by the CDO at maturity. Both types of CDOs are typically managed by a third-party asset manager. In these transactions, all of the equity and notes issued by the CDO are funded, as the cash is needed to purchase the debt securities. In a typical cash CDO, a third-party investment manager selects a portfolio of assets, which the Company funds through a warehouse financing arrangement prior to the creation of the CDO. The Company then sells the debt securities to the CDO in exchange for cash raised through the issuance of notes. The Company's continuing involvement in cash CDOs is typically limited to investing in a portion of the notes or loans issued by the CDO and making a market in those securities, and acting as derivative counterparty for interest rate or foreign currency swaps used in the structuring of the CDO.

            A synthetic CDO is similar to a cash CDO, except that the CDO obtains exposure to all or a portion of the referenced assets synthetically through derivative instruments, such as credit default swaps. Because the CDO does not need to raise cash sufficient to purchase the entire referenced portfolio, a substantial portion of the senior tranches of risk is typically passed on to CDO investors in the form of unfunded liabilities or derivative instruments. Thus, the CDO writes credit protection on select referenced debt securities to the Company or third parties and the risk is then passed on to the CDO investors in the form of funded notes or purchased credit protection through derivative instruments. Any cash raised from investors is invested in a portfolio of collateral securities or investment contracts. The collateral is then used to support the obligations of the CDO on the credit default swaps written to counterparties. The Company's continuing involvement in synthetic CDOs generally includes purchasing credit protection through credit default swaps with the CDO, owning a portion of the capital structure of the CDO in the form of both unfunded derivative positions (primarily super-senior exposures discussed below) and funded notes, entering into interest-rate swap and total-return swap transactions with the CDO, lending to the CDO, and making a market in those funded notes.

            A securitized collateralized loan obligation (CLO) is substantially similar to the CDO transactions described above, except that the assets owned by the SPE (either cash instruments or synthetic exposures through derivative instruments) are corporate loans and to a lesser extent corporate bonds, rather than asset-backed debt securities.

            Where a CDO vehicle issues preferred shares, the preferred shares generally represent an insufficient amount of equity (less than 10%) and create the presumption that the preferred shares are insufficient to finance the entity's activities without subordinated financial support. In addition, although the preferred shareholders generally have full exposure to expected losses on the collateral and uncapped potential to receive expected residual rewards, it is not always clear whether they have the ability to make decisions about the entity that have a significant effect on the entity's financial results because of their limited role in making day-to-day decisions and their limited ability to remove the third-party asset manager. Because one or both of the above conditions will generally be met, we have assumed that, even where a CDO vehicle issued preferred shares, the vehicle should be classified as a VIE.

    Consolidation and subsequent deconsolidation of CDOs

            Substantially all of the CDOs that the Company is involved with are managed by a third-party asset manager. In general, the third-party asset manager, through its ability to purchase and sell assets or, where the reinvestment period of a CDO has expired, the ability to sell assets, will have the power to direct the activities of the vehicle that most significantly impact the economic performance of the CDO. However, where a CDO has experienced an event of default, the activities of the third-party asset manager may be curtailed and certain additional rights will generally be provided to the investors in a CDO vehicle, including the right to direct the liquidation of the CDO vehicle.

            The Company has retained significant portions of the "super-senior" positions issued by certain CDOs. These positions are referred to as "super-senior" because they represent the most senior positions in the CDO and, at the time of structuring, were senior to tranches rated AAA by independent rating agencies. These positions include facilities structured in the form of short-term commercial paper, where the Company wrote put options ("liquidity puts") to certain CDOs. Under the terms of the liquidity puts, if the CDO was unable to issue commercial paper at a rate below a specified maximum (generally LIBOR + 35 bps to LIBOR + 40 bps), the Company was obligated to fund the senior tranche of the CDO at a specified interest rate. As of June 30, 2010, the Company no longer had exposure to this commercial paper as all of the underlying CDOs had been liquidated.

            Since the inception of many CDO transactions, the subordinate tranches of the CDOs have diminished significantly in value and in rating. The declines in value of the subordinate tranches and in the super-senior tranches indicate that the super-senior tranches are now exposed to a significant portion of the expected losses of the CDOs, based on current market assumptions.

            The Company does not generally have the power to direct the activities of the vehicle that most significantly impact the economic performance of the CDOs as this power is held by the third-party asset manager of the CDO. As such, certain synthetic and cash CDOs that were consolidated under ASC 810, were deconsolidated upon the adoption of SFAS 167. The deconsolidation of certain synthetic CDOs resulted in the recognition of current receivables and payables related to purchased and written credit default swaps entered into by Citigroup with the CDOs, which had previously been eliminated upon consolidation of these vehicles.

            Where: (i) an event of default has occurred for a CDO vehicle, (ii) the Company has the unilateral ability to remove the third-party asset manager without cause or liquidate the CDO, and (iii) the Company has exposure to the vehicle that is potentially significant to the vehicle, the Company will consolidate the CDO. In addition, where the Company is the asset manager of the CDO vehicle and has exposure to the vehicle that is potentially significant, the Company will generally consolidate the CDO.

            The net impact of adopting SFAS 167 for CDOs was an increase in the Company's assets of $1.9 billion and liabilities of $1.9 billion as of January 1, 2010. The Company continues to monitor its involvement in unconsolidated CDOs. If the Company were to acquire additional interests in these vehicles, be provided the right to direct the activities of a CDO (if the Company obtains the unilateral ability to remove

    146


    the third-party asset manager without cause or liquidate the CDO), or if the CDOs' contractual arrangements were to be changed to reallocate expected losses or residual returns among the various interest holders, the Company may be required to consolidate the CDOs. For cash CDOs, the net result of such consolidation would be to gross up the Company's balance sheet by the current fair value of the subordinate securities held by third parties, whose amounts are not considered material. For synthetic CDOs, the net result of such consolidation may reduce the Company's balance sheet by eliminating intercompany derivative receivables and payables in consolidation.

    Key Assumptions and Retained Interests—Citi Holdings

            The key assumptions, used for the securitization of CDOs and CLOs during the quarter ended June 30, 2010, in measuring the fair value of retained interests at the date of sale or securitization are as follows:

     
     CDOs  CLOs

    Discount rate

      37.2% to 40.6%  4.9% to 5.4%
         

            The effect of two negative changes in discount rates used to determine the fair value of retained interests is disclosed below.

    In millions of dollars CDOs  CLOs  

    Carrying value of retained interests

      $308  $673 
          

    Discount rates

           
     

    Adverse change of 10%

      $(23) $(9)
     

    Adverse change of 20%

       (44)  (18)
          

    Asset-Based Financing

            The Company provides loans and other forms of financing to VIEs that hold assets. Those loans are subject to the same credit approvals as all other loans originated or purchased by the Company. Financings in the form of debt securities or derivatives are, in most circumstances, reported in Trading account assets and accounted for at fair value through earnings. The Company does not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact these VIEs' economic performance and thus it does not consolidate them.

    Asset-Based Financing—Citicorp

            The primary types of Citicorp's asset-based financing, total assets of the unconsolidated VIEs with significant involvement and the Company's maximum exposure to loss at June 30, 2010 are shown below. For the Company to realize that maximum loss, the VIE (borrower) would have to default with no recovery from the assets held by the VIE.

    In billions of dollars Total assets  Maximum
    exposure
     

    Type

           

    Commercial and other real estate

      $9.0  $0.5 

    Hedge funds and equities

       5.7   3.1 

    Airplanes, ships and other assets

       10.1   4.9 
          

    Total

      $24.8  $8.5 
          

    Asset-Based Financing—Citi Holdings

            The primary types of Citi Holdings' asset-based financing, total assets of the unconsolidated VIEs with significant involvement and the Company's maximum exposure to loss at June 30, 2010 are shown below. For the Company to realize that maximum loss, the VIE (borrower) would have to default with no recovery from the assets held by the VIE.

    In billions of dollars Total
    assets
     Maximum
    exposure
     

    Type

           

    Commercial and other real estate

      $31.2  $5.8 

    Hedge funds and equities

       1.9   0.7 

    Corporate loans

       7.6   6.5 

    Airplanes, ships and other assets

       5.9   2.6 
          

    Total

      $46.6  $15.6 
          

            The following table summarizes selected cash flow information related to asset-based financing for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009:

     
     Three months ended
    June 30,
     
    In billions of dollars 2010  2009  

    Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows

      $0.4  $0.1 
          

     

     
     Six months ended
    June 30,
     
    In billions of dollars 2010  2009  

    Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows

      $0.9  $2.0 
          

    147


            The effect of two negative changes in discount rates used to determine the fair value of retained interests is disclosed below.

    In millions of dollars Asset-based
    financing
     

    Carrying value of retained interests

      $6,487 

    Value of underlying portfolio

        
     

    Adverse change of 10%

     $ 
     

    Adverse change of 20%

      (153)
        

    Municipal Securities Tender Option Bond (TOB) Trusts

            The Company sponsors TOB trusts that hold fixed- and floating-rate, tax-exempt securities issued by state or local municipalities. The trusts are typically single-issuer trusts whose assets are purchased from the Company and from the market. The trusts are referred to as Tender Option Bond trusts because the senior interest holders have the ability to tender their interests periodically back to the issuing trust, as described further below.

            The TOB trusts fund the purchase of their assets by issuing long-term senior floating rate notes (Floaters) and junior residual securities (Residuals). The Floaters and the Residuals have a tenor equal to the maturity of the trust, which is equal to or shorter than the tenor of the underlying municipal bond. Residuals are frequently less than 1% of a trust's total funding and entitle their holder to the residual cash flows from the issuing trust. The Residuals are generally rated based on the long-term rating of the underlying municipal bond. The Floaters bear interest rates that are typically reset weekly to a new market rate (based on the SIFMA index: a seven day high grade market index of tax exempt, variable rate municipal bonds). Floater holders have an option to tender their Floaters back to the trust periodically. The Floaters have a long-term rating based on the long-term rating of the underlying municipal bond, including any credit enhancement provided by monoline insurance companies, and a short-term rating based on that of the liquidity provider to the trust.

            The Company sponsors two kinds of TOB trusts: customer TOB trusts and proprietary TOB trusts. Customer TOB trusts are trusts through which customers finance investments in municipal securities. The Residuals are held by customers, and the Floaters by third-party investors. Proprietary TOB trusts are trusts through which the Company finances its own investments in municipal securities. The Company holds the Residuals in proprietary TOB trusts.

            The Company serves as remarketing agent to the trusts, facilitating the sale of the Floaters to third parties at inception and facilitating the reset of the Floater coupon and tenders of Floaters. If Floaters are tendered and the Company (in its role as remarketing agent) is unable to find a new investor within a specified period of time, it can declare a failed remarketing (in which case the trust is unwound) or it may choose to buy the Floaters into its own inventory and may continue to try to sell them to a third-party investor. While the level of the Company's inventory of Floaters fluctuates, the Company held none of the Floater inventory related to the customer or proprietary TOB programs as of June 30, 2010.

            Approximately $1.3 billion of the municipal bonds owned by TOB trusts have a credit guarantee provided by the Company. In all other cases, the assets are either unenhanced or are insured with a monoline insurance company. While the trusts have not encountered any adverse credit events as defined in the underlying trust agreements, certain monoline insurance companies have experienced downgrades. In these cases, the Company has proactively managed the TOB programs by applying additional insurance on the assets or proceeding with orderly unwinds of the trusts.

            If a trust is unwound early due to an event other than a credit event on the underlying municipal bond, the underlying municipal bond is sold in the market. If there is an accompanying shortfall in the trust's cash flows to fund the redemption of the Floaters after the sale of the underlying municipal bond, the trust draws on a liquidity agreement in an amount equal to the shortfall. Liquidity agreements are generally provided to the trust directly by the Company. For customer TOBs where the Residual is less than 25% of the trust's capital structure, the Company has a reimbursement agreement with the Residual holder under which the Residual holder reimburses the Company for any payment made under the liquidity arrangement. Through this reimbursement agreement, the Residual holder remains economically exposed to fluctuations in value of the municipal bond. These reimbursement agreements are actively margined based on changes in value of the underlying municipal bond to mitigate the Company's counterparty credit risk. In cases where a third party provides liquidity to a proprietary TOB trust, a similar reimbursement arrangement is made whereby the Company (or a consolidated subsidiary of the Company) as Residual holder absorbs any losses incurred by the liquidity provider. As of June 30, 2010, liquidity agreements provided with respect to customer TOB trusts totaled $6.3 billion, offset by reimbursement agreements in place with a notional amount of $4.8 billion. The remaining exposure relates to TOB transactions where the Residual owned by the customer is at least 25% of the bond value at the inception of the transaction and no reimbursement agreement is executed. In addition, the Company has provided liquidity arrangements with a notional amount of $0.1 billion for other non-consolidated proprietary TOB trusts described below.

            The Company considers the customer and proprietary TOB trusts to be VIEs. Customer TOB trusts were not consolidated by the Company in prior periods and remain unconsolidated upon the Company's adoption of SFAS 167. Because third-party investors hold the Residual and Floater interests in the customer TOB trusts, the Company's involvement includes only its role as remarketing agent and liquidity provider. The Company has concluded that the power over customer TOB trusts is primarily held by the customer Residual holder, who may unilaterally cause the sale of the trust's bonds. Because the Company does not hold the Residual interest and thus does not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the trust's economic performance, it does not consolidate the customer TOB trusts under SFAS 167.

            Proprietary TOB trusts generally were consolidated in prior periods. They remain consolidated upon the Company's adoption of SFAS 167. The Company's involvement with the Proprietary TOB trusts includes holding the Residual interests as well as the remarketing and liquidity agreements with the trusts. Similar to customer TOB trusts, the Company has concluded that the power over the proprietary TOB trusts is primarily held by the Residual holder, who may unilaterally cause the sale of the trust's bonds. Because the Company holds the Residual interest, and thus has the power to direct

    148


    the activities that most significantly impact the trust's economic performance, it continues to consolidate the proprietary TOB trusts under SFAS 167.

            Prior to 2010, certain TOB trusts met the definition of a QSPE and were not consolidated in prior periods. Upon the Company's adoption of SFAS 167, former QSPE trusts have been consolidated by the Company as Residual interest holders and are presented as proprietary TOB trusts.

            Total assets in proprietary TOB trusts also include $0.7 billion of assets where the Residuals are held by hedge funds that are consolidated and managed by the Company. The assets and the associated liabilities of these TOB trusts are not consolidated by the hedge funds (and, thus, are not consolidated by the Company) under the application of ASC 946, Financial Services—Investment Companies, which precludes consolidation of owned investments. The Company consolidates the hedge funds, because the Company holds controlling financial interests in the hedge funds. Certain of the Company's equity investments in the hedge funds are hedged with derivatives transactions executed by the Company with third parties referencing the returns of the hedge fund. The Company's accounting for these hedge funds and their interests in the TOB trusts is unchanged by the Company's adoption of SFAS 167.

    Municipal Investments

            Municipal investment transactions are primarily interests in partnerships that finance the construction and rehabilitation of low-income housing, facilitate lending in new or underserved markets, or finance the construction or operation of renewable municipal energy facilities. The Company generally invests in these partnerships as a limited partner and earns a return primarily through the receipt of tax credits and grants earned from the investments made by the partnership. These entities are generally considered VIEs. The power to direct the activities of these entities is typically held by the general partner. Accordingly, these entities have remained unconsolidated by the Company upon adoption of SFAS 167.

    Client Intermediation

            Client intermediation transactions represent a range of transactions designed to provide investors with specified returns based on the returns of an underlying security, referenced asset or index. These transactions include credit-linked notes and equity-linked notes. In these transactions, the SPE typically obtains exposure to the underlying security, referenced asset or index through a derivative instrument, such as a total-return swap or a credit-default swap. In turn the SPE issues notes to investors that pay a return based on the specified underlying security, referenced asset or index. The SPE invests the proceeds in a financial asset or a guaranteed insurance contract (GIC) that serves as collateral for the derivative contract over the term of the transaction. The Company's involvement in these transactions includes being the counterparty to the SPE's derivative instruments and investing in a portion of the notes issued by the SPE. In certain transactions, the investor's maximum risk of loss is limited and the Company absorbs risk of loss above a specified level. The Company does not have the power to direct the activities of the VIEs which most significantly impact their economic performance and thus it does not consolidate them.

            The Company's maximum risk of loss in these transactions is defined as the amount invested in notes issued by the SPE and the notional amount of any risk of loss absorbed by the Company through a separate instrument issued by the SPE. The derivative instrument held by the Company may generate a receivable from the SPE (for example, where the Company purchases credit protection from the SPE in connection with the SPE's issuance of a credit-linked note), which is collateralized by the assets owned by the SPE. These derivative instruments are not considered variable interests and any associated receivables are not included in the calculation of maximum exposure to the SPE.

    Structured Investment Vehicles

            Structured Investment Vehicles (SIVs) are SPEs that issue junior notes and senior debt (medium-term notes and short-term commercial paper) to fund the purchase of high quality assets. The Company acts as manager for the SIVs.

            In order to complete the wind-down of the SIVs, the Company purchased the remaining assets of the SIVs in November 2008. The Company funded the purchase of the SIV assets by assuming the obligation to pay amounts due under the medium-term notes issued by the SIVs as the medium-term notes mature.

    Investment Funds

            The Company is the investment manager for certain investment funds that invest in various asset classes including private equity, hedge funds, real estate, fixed income and infrastructure. The Company earns a management fee, which is a percentage of capital under management, and may earn performance fees. In addition, for some of these funds the Company has an ownership interest in the investment funds. The Company has also established a number of investment funds as opportunities for qualified employees to invest in private equity investments. The Company acts as investment manager to these funds and may provide employees with financing on both recourse and non-recourse bases for a portion of the employees' investment commitments.

            The Company has determined that a majority of the investment vehicles managed by Citigroup are provided a deferral from the requirements of SFAS 167, because they meet the criteria in Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-10, Consolidation (Topic 810), Amendments for Certain Investment Funds (ASU 2010-10) (see Note 1). These vehicles continue to be evaluated under the requirements of ASC 810-10, prior to the implementation of SFAS 167 (FIN 46(R)).

            Where the Company has determined that certain investment vehicles are subject to the consolidation requirements of SFAS 167, the consolidation conclusions reached upon initial application of SFAS 167 are consistent with the consolidation conclusions reached under the requirements of ASC 810-10, prior to the implementation of SFAS 167.

    Trust Preferred Securities

            The Company has raised financing through the issuance of trust preferred securities. In these transactions, the Company forms a statutory business trust and owns all of the voting equity shares of the trust. The trust issues preferred equity securities to third-party investors and invests the gross

    149


    proceeds in junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures issued by the Company. These trusts have no assets, operations, revenues or cash flows other than those related to the issuance, administration and repayment of the preferred equity securities held by third-party investors. These trusts' obligations are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by the Company.

            Because the sole asset of the trust is a receivable from the Company and the proceeds to the Company from the receivable exceed the Company's investment in the VIE's equity shares, the Company is not permitted to consolidate the trusts, even though the Company owns all of the voting equity shares of the trust, has fully guaranteed the trusts' obligations, and has the right to redeem the preferred securities in certain circumstances. The Company recognizes the subordinated debentures on its Consolidated Balance Sheet as long-term liabilities.

    150



    15.    DERIVATIVES ACTIVITIES

            In the ordinary course of business, Citigroup enters into various types of derivative transactions. These derivative transactions include:

      Futures and forward contracts which are commitments to buy or sell at a future date a financial instrument, commodity or currency at a contracted price and may be settled in cash or through delivery.

      Swap contracts which are commitments to settle in cash at a future date or dates that may range from a few days to a number of years, based on differentials between specified financial indices, as applied to a notional principal amount.

      Option contracts which give the purchaser, for a fee, the right, but not the obligation, to buy or sell within a limited time a financial instrument, commodity or currency at a contracted price that may also be settled in cash, based on differentials between specified indices or prices.

            Citigroup enters into these derivative contracts relating to interest rate, foreign currency, commodity, and other market/credit risks for the following reasons:

      Trading Purposes—Customer Needs:  Citigroup offers its customers derivatives in connection with their risk-management actions to transfer, modify or reduce their interest rate, foreign exchange and other market/credit risks or for their own trading purposes. As part of this process, Citigroup considers the customers' suitability for the risk involved and the business purpose for the transaction. Citigroup also manages its derivative-risk positions through offsetting trade activities, controls focused on price verification, and daily reporting of positions to senior managers.

      Trading Purposes—Own Account:  Citigroup trades derivatives for its own account and as an active market maker. Trading limits and price verification controls are key aspects of this activity.

      Hedging:  Citigroup uses derivatives in connection with its risk-management activities to hedge certain risks or reposition the risk profile of the Company. For example, Citigroup may issue fixed-rate long-term debt and then enter into a receive-fixed, pay-variable-rate interest rate swap with the same tenor and notional amount to convert the interest payments to a net variable-rate basis. This strategy is the most common form of an interest rate hedge, as it minimizes interest cost in certain yield curve environments. Derivatives are also used to manage risks inherent in specific groups of on-balance-sheet assets and liabilities, including investments, corporate and consumer loans, deposit liabilities, as well as other interest-sensitive assets and liabilities. In addition, foreign-exchange contracts are used to hedge non-U.S.-dollar-denominated debt, foreign-currency-denominated available-for-sale securities, net capital exposures and foreign-exchange transactions.

            Derivatives may expose Citigroup to market, credit or liquidity risks in excess of the amounts recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Market risk on a derivative product is the exposure created by potential fluctuations in interest rates, foreign-exchange rates and other factors and is a function of the type of product, the volume of transactions, the tenor and terms of the agreement, and the underlying volatility. Credit risk is the exposure to loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the transaction where the value of any collateral held is not adequate to cover such losses. The recognition in earnings of unrealized gains on these transactions is subject to management's assessment as to collectability. Liquidity risk is the potential exposure that arises when the size of the derivative position may not be able to be rapidly adjusted in periods of high volatility and financial stress at a reasonable cost.

            Information pertaining to the volume of derivative activity is provided in the tables below. The notional amounts, for both long and short derivative positions, of Citigroup's derivative instruments as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 are presented in the table below.

    151


    Derivative Notionals

     
     Hedging instruments under
    ASC 815 (SFAS 133)(1)(2)
     Other derivative instruments  
     
      
      
     Trading derivatives  Management hedges(3)  
    In millions of dollars  June 30,
    2010
     December 31,
    2009
     June 30,
    2010
     December 31,
    2009
     June 30,
    2010
     December 31,
    2009
     

    Interest rate contracts

                       
     

    Swaps

      $155,838  $128,797  $25,017,918  $20,571,814  $115,879  $107,193 
     

    Futures and forwards

           4,884,162   3,366,927   53,896   65,597 
     

    Written options

           3,370,356   3,616,240   8,510   11,050 
     

    Purchased options

           3,034,676   3,590,032   21,720   28,725 
                  

    Total interest rate contract notionals

      $155,838  $128,797  $36,307,112  $31,145,013  $200,005  $212,565 
                  

    Foreign exchange contracts

                       
     

    Swaps

      $27,335  $42,621  $937,613  $855,560  $24,428  $24,044 
     

    Futures and forwards

       96,204   76,507   2,138,152   1,946,802   38,252   54,249 
     

    Written options

       1,973   4,685   527,410   409,991   2,958   9,305 
     

    Purchased options

       10,157   22,594   503,129   387,786   3,465   10,188 
                  

    Total foreign exchange contract notionals

      $135,669  $146,407  $4,106,304  $3,600,139  $69,103  $97,786 
                  

    Equity contracts

                       
     

    Swaps

      $  $  $72,298  $59,391  $  $ 
     

    Futures and forwards

           15,839   14,627     
     

    Written options

           533,403   410,002     
     

    Purchased options

           430,167   377,961     275 
                  

    Total equity contract notionals

      $  $  $1,051,707  $861,981  $  $275 
                  

    Commodity and other contracts

                       
     

    Swaps

      $  $  $28,410  $25,956  $  $ 
     

    Futures and forwards

           119,638   91,582     
     

    Written options

           51,099   37,952     
     

    Purchased options

           75,468   40,321   2   3 
                  

    Total commodity and other contract notionals

      $  $  $274,615  $195,811  $2  $3 
                  

    Credit derivatives(4)

                       
     

    Protection sold

      $  $  $1,181,324  $1,214,053  $  $ 
     

    Protection purchased

       6,836   6,981   1,232,277   1,325,981   51,366   
                  

    Total credit derivatives

      $6,836  $6,981  $2,413,601  $2,540,034  $51,366  $ 
                  

    Total derivative notionals

      $298,343  $282,185  $44,153,339  $38,342,978  $320,476  $310,629 
                  

    (1)
    The notional amounts presented in this table do not include derivatives in hedge accounting relationships under ASC 815 (SFAS 133), where Citigroup is hedging the foreign currency risk of a net investment in a foreign operation by issuing a foreign currency denominated debt instrument. The notional amount of such debt is $9,579 million and $7,442 million at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.

    (2)
    Derivatives in hedge accounting relationships accounted for under ASC 815 (SFAS 133) are recorded in either Other assets/liabilities or Trading account assets/liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

    (3)
    Management hedges represent derivative instruments used in certain economic hedging relationships that are identified for management purposes, but for which hedge accounting is not applied. These derivatives are recorded in Other assets/liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

    (4)
    Credit derivatives are arrangements designed to allow one party (protection buyer) to transfer the credit risk of a "reference asset" to another party (protection seller). These arrangements allow a protection seller to assume the credit risk associated with the reference asset without directly purchasing that asset. The Company has entered into credit derivatives positions for purposes such as risk management, yield enhancement, reduction of credit concentrations and diversification of overall risk.

    152


    Derivative Mark-to-Market (MTM) Receivables/Payables

     
     Derivatives classified in trading
    account assets/liabilities(1)
     Derivatives classified in other
    assets/liabilities
     
    In millions of dollars at June 30, 2010  Assets  Liabilities  Assets  Liabilities  

    Derivative instruments designated as ASC 815 (SFAS 133) hedges

                 

    Interest rate contracts

      $826  $99  $7,308  $2,366 

    Foreign exchange contracts

       1,737   231   1,582   3,058 
              

    Total derivative instruments designated as ASC 815 (SFAS 133) hedges

      $2,563  $330  $8,890  $5,424 
              

    Other derivative instruments

                 

    Interest rate contracts

      $589,370  $583,964  $3,154  $3,034 

    Foreign exchange contracts

       80,421   85,219   1,042   2,052 

    Equity contracts

       20,426   38,337     

    Commodity and other contracts

       12,999   13,107     

    Credit derivatives(2)

       84,987   77,390   467   277 
              

    Total other derivative instruments

      $788,203  $798,017  $4,663  $5,363 
              

    Total derivatives

      $790,766  $798,347  $13,553  $10,787 

    Cash collateral paid/received

       49,035   39,216   619   5,012 

    Less: Netting agreements and market value adjustments

       (783,280)  (778,290)  (1,576)  (1,576)
              

    Net receivables/payables

      $56,521  $59,273  $12,596  $14,223 
              

    (1)
    The trading derivatives fair values are presented in Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

    (2)
    The credit derivatives trading assets are composed of $69,439 million related to protection purchased and $15,548 million related to protection sold as of June 30, 2010. The credit derivatives trading liabilities are composed of $15,603 million related to protection purchased and $61,787 million related to protection sold as of June 30, 2010.

     
     Derivatives classified in trading
    account assets/liabilities(1)
     Derivatives classified in other
    assets/liabilities
     
    In millions of dollars at December 31, 2009  Assets  Liabilities  Assets  Liabilities  

    Derivative instruments designated as ASC 815 (SFAS 133) hedges

                 

    Interest rate contracts

      $304  $87  $4,267  $2,898 

    Foreign exchange contracts

       753   1,580   3,599   1,416 
              

    Total derivative instruments designated as ASC 815 (SFAS 133) hedges

      $1,057  $1,667  $7,866  $4,314 
              

    Other derivative instruments

                 

    Interest rate contracts

      $454,974  $449,551  $2,882  $3,022 

    Foreign exchange contracts

       71,005   70,584   1,498   2,381 

    Equity contracts

       18,132   40,612   6   5 

    Commodity and other contracts

       16,698   15,492     

    Credit derivatives(2)

       92,792   82,424     
              

    Total other derivative instruments

      $653,601  $658,663  $4,386  $5,408 
              

    Total derivatives

      $654,658  $660,330  $12,252  $9,722 

    Cash collateral paid/received

       48,561   38,611   263   4,950 

    Less: Netting agreements and market value adjustments

       (644,340)  (634,835)  (4,224)  (4,224)
              

    Net receivables/payables

      $58,879  $64,106  $8,291  $10,448 
              

    (1)
    The trading derivatives fair values are presented in Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

    (2)
    The credit derivatives trading assets are composed of $68,558 million related to protection purchased and $24,234 million related to protection sold as of December 31, 2009. The credit derivatives trading liabilities are composed of $24,162 million related to protection purchased and $58,262 million related to protection sold as of December 31, 2009.

            All derivatives are reported on the balance sheet at fair value. In addition, where applicable, all such contracts covered by master netting agreements are reported net. Gross positive fair values are netted with gross negative fair values by counterparty pursuant to a valid master netting agreement. In addition, payables and receivables in respect of cash collateral received from or paid to a given counterparty are included in this netting. However, non-cash collateral is not included.

            The amount of payables in respect of cash collateral received that was netted with unrealized gains from derivatives was $36 billion and $30 billion as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. The amount of receivables in respect of cash collateral paid that was netted with unrealized losses from derivatives was $41 billion as of June 30, 2010 as well as December 31, 2009.

            The amounts recognized in Principal transactions in the Consolidated Statement of Income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009 related to derivatives not designated in a qualifying hedging relationship as well as the underlying non-derivative instruments are included in the table below. Citigroup has elected to present this disclosure by business classification, showing derivative gains and losses related to its trading activities together with gains and losses related to non-derivative instruments within the same trading portfolios, as this better represents the way these portfolios are risk managed.

    153


     
     Three Months Ended June 30,  Six Months Ended June 30,  
    In millions of dollars  2010  2009  2010  2009  

    Interest rate contracts

      $2,231  $1,613  $3,642  $6,453 

    Foreign exchange contracts

       262   858   503   1,864 

    Equity contracts

       (250)  (175)  315   903 

    Commodity and other contracts

       121   130   230   827 

    Credit derivatives

       (147)  (638)  1,680   (4,346)
              

    Total Citigroup(1)

      $2,217  $1,788  $6,370  $5,701 
              

    (1)
    Also see Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

            The amounts recognized in Other revenue in the Consolidated Statement of Income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009 relate to derivatives not designated in a qualifying hedging relationship and not recorded within Trading account assets or Trading account liabilitiesare shown below. The table below does not include the offsetting gains/losses on the hedged items, which amounts are also recorded in Other revenue.

     
     Three Months Ended June 30,  Six Months Ended June 30,  
    In millions of dollars  2010  2009  2010  2009  

    Interest rate contracts

      $(205) $(460) $(299) $(449)

    Foreign exchange contracts

       (3,008)  3,464   (5,825)  2,468 

    Equity contracts

             

    Commodity and other contracts

             

    Credit derivatives

       141     141   
              

    Total Citigroup(1)

      $(3,072) $3,004  $(5,983) $2,019 
              

    (1)
    Non-designated derivatives are derivative instruments not designated in qualifying hedging relationships.

    Accounting for Derivative Hedging

            Citigroup accounts for its hedging activities in accordance with ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging (formerly SFAS 133). As a general rule, hedge accounting is permitted where the Company is exposed to a particular risk, such as interest-rate or foreign-exchange risk, that causes changes in the fair value of an asset or liability or variability in the expected future cash flows of an existing asset, liability or a forecasted transaction that may affect earnings.

            Derivative contracts hedging the risks associated with the changes in fair value are referred to as fair value hedges, while contracts hedging the risks affecting the expected future cash flows are called cash flow hedges. Hedges that utilize derivatives or debt instruments to manage the foreign exchange risk associated with equity investments in non-U.S.-dollar functional currency foreign subsidiaries (net investment in a foreign operation) are called net investment hedges.

            If certain hedging criteria specified in ASC 815 are met, including testing for hedge effectiveness, special hedge accounting may be applied. The hedge effectiveness assessment methodologies for similar hedges are performed in a similar manner and are used consistently throughout the hedging relationships. For fair value hedges, the changes in value of the hedging derivative, as well as the changes in value of the related hedged item due to the risk being hedged, are reflected in current earnings. For cash flow hedges and net investment hedges, the changes in value of the hedging derivative are reflected in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in Citigroup's stockholders' equity, to the extent the hedge is effective. Hedge ineffectiveness, in either case, is reflected in current earnings.

            For asset/liability management hedging, the fixed-rate long-term debt may be recorded at amortized cost under current U.S. GAAP. However, by electing to use ASC 815 (SFAS 133) hedge accounting, the carrying value of the debt is adjusted for changes in the benchmark interest rate, with any such changes in value recorded in current earnings. The related interest-rate swap is also recorded on the balance sheet at fair value, with any changes in fair value reflected in earnings. Thus, any ineffectiveness resulting from the hedging relationship is recorded in current earnings. Alternatively, an economic hedge, which does not meet the ASC 815 hedging criteria, would involve recording only the derivative at fair value on the balance sheet, with its associated changes in fair value recorded in earnings. The debt would continue to be carried at amortized cost and, therefore, current earnings would be impacted only by the interest rate shifts and other factors that cause the change in the swap's value and the underlying yield of the debt. This type of hedge is undertaken when hedging requirements cannot be achieved or management decides not to apply ASC 815 hedge accounting. Another alternative for the Company would be to elect to carry the debt at fair value under the fair value option. Once the irrevocable election is made upon issuance of the debt, the full change in fair value of the debt would be reported in earnings. The related interest rate swap, with changes in fair value, would also be reflected in earnings, and provides a natural offset to the debt's fair value change. To the extent the two offsets would not be exactly equal, the difference would be reflected in current earnings. This type of economic hedge is undertaken when the Company prefers to follow this simpler method that achieves generally similar financial statement results to an ASC 815 fair value hedge.

            Key aspects of achieving ASC 815 hedge accounting are documentation of hedging strategy and hedge effectiveness at the hedge inception and substantiating hedge effectiveness on an ongoing basis. A derivative must be highly effective in

    154


    accomplishing the hedge objective of offsetting either changes in the fair value or cash flows of the hedged item for the risk being hedged. Any ineffectiveness in the hedge relationship is recognized in current earnings. The assessment of effectiveness excludes changes in the value of the hedged item that are unrelated to the risks being hedged. Similarly, the assessment of effectiveness may exclude changes in the fair value of a derivative related to time value that, if excluded, are recognized in current earnings.

    Fair Value Hedges

    Hedging of benchmark interest rate risk

            Citigroup hedges exposure to changes in the fair value of outstanding fixed-rate issued debt and certificate of deposit. The fixed cash flows from those financing transactions are converted to benchmark variable-rate cash flows by entering into receive-fixed, pay-variable interest rate swaps. Most of these fair value hedge relationships use dollar-offset ratio analysis to determine whether the hedging relationships are highly effective at inception and on an ongoing basis, while others use regression.

            Citigroup also hedges exposure to changes in the fair value of fixed-rate assets, including available-for-sale debt securities and loans. The hedging instruments used are receive-variable, pay-fixed interest rate swaps. Most of these fair value hedging relationships use dollar-offset ratio analysis to determine whether the hedging relationships are highly effective at inception and on an ongoing basis, while certain others use regression analysis.

    Hedging of foreign exchange risk

            Citigroup hedges the change in fair value attributable to foreign-exchange rate movements in available-for-sale securities that are denominated in currencies other than the functional currency of the entity holding the securities, which may be within or outside the U.S. The hedging instrument employed is a forward foreign-exchange contract. In this type of hedge, the change in fair value of the hedged available-for-sale security attributable to the portion of foreign exchange risk hedged is reported in earnings and not Accumulated other comprehensive income—a process that serves to offset substantially the change in fair value of the forward contract that is also reflected in earnings. Citigroup considers the premium associated with forward contracts (differential between spot and contractual forward rates) as the cost of hedging; this is excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness and reflected directly in earnings. Dollar-offset method is used to assess hedge effectiveness. Since that assessment is based on changes in fair value attributable to changes in spot rates on both the available-for-sale securities and the forward contracts for the portion of the relationship hedged, the amount of hedge ineffectiveness is not significant.

            The following table summarizes the gains (losses) on the Company's fair value hedges for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009:

     
     Gains (losses) on fair value hedges(1)  
     
     Three Months ended June 30,  Six Months ended June 30,  
    In millions of dollars 2010  2009  2010  2009  

    Gain (loss) on fair value designated and qualifying hedges

                 

    Interest rate contracts

      $1,509  $(3,178) $2,342  $(4,921)

    Foreign exchange contracts

       1,916   1,653   1,674   1,625 
              

    Total gain (loss) on fair value designated and qualifying hedges

      $3,425  $(1,525) $4,016  $(3,296)
              

    Gain (loss) on the hedged item in designated and qualifying fair value hedges

                 

    Interest rate hedges

      $(1,543) $2,953  $(2,448) $4,948 

    Foreign exchange hedges

       (1,860)  (1,877)  (1,591)  (1,434)
              

    Total gain (loss) on the hedged item in designated and qualifying fair value hedges

      $(3,403) $1,076  $(4,039) $3,514 
              

    Hedge ineffectiveness recognized in earnings on designated and qualifying fair value hedges

                 

    Interest rate hedges

      $8  $(120) $(67) $216 

    Foreign exchange hedges

       25   (108)  26   40 
              

    Total hedge ineffectiveness recognized in earnings on designated and qualifying fair value hedges

      $33  $(228) $(41) $256 
              

    Net gain (loss) excluded from assessment of the effectiveness of fair value hedges

                 

    Interest rate contracts

      $(42) $(105) $(39) $(189)

    Foreign exchange contracts

       31   (116)  57   151 
              

    Total net gain (loss) excluded from assessment of the effectiveness of fair value hedges

      $(11) $(221) $18  $(38)
              

    (1)
    Amounts are included in Other revenue on the Consolidated Statement of Income. The accrued interest income on fair value hedges is recorded in Net interest revenue and is excluded from this table.

    155


    Cash Flow Hedges

    Hedging of benchmark interest rate risk

            Citigroup hedges variable cash flows resulting from floating-rate liabilities and roll-over (re-issuance) of short-term liabilities. Variable cash flows from those liabilities are converted to fixed-rate cash flows by entering into receive-variable, pay-fixed interest-rate swaps and receive-variable, pay-fixed forward-starting interest-rate swaps. These cash-flow hedging relationships use either regression analysis or dollar-offset ratio analysis to assess whether the hedging relationships are highly effective at inception and on an ongoing basis. Since efforts are made to match the terms of the derivatives to those of the hedged forecasted cash flows as closely as possible, the amount of hedge ineffectiveness is not significant.

    Hedging of foreign exchange risk

            Citigroup locks in the functional currency equivalent of cash flows of various balance sheet liability exposures, including short-term borrowings and long-term debt (and the forecasted issuances or rollover of such items) that are denominated in a currency other than the functional currency of the issuing entity. Depending on the risk-management objectives, these types of hedges are designated as either cash-flow hedges of only foreign exchange risk or cash-flow hedges of both foreign-exchange and interest rate risk, and the hedging instruments used are foreign-exchange forward contracts, cross-currency swaps and foreign-currency options. For some hedges, Citigroup matches all terms of the hedged item and the hedging derivative at inception and on an ongoing basis to eliminate hedge ineffectiveness. Citigroup does not exclude any terms from consideration when applying the matched terms method. To the extent all terms are not perfectly matched, any ineffectiveness is measured using the "hypothetical derivative method" from FASB Derivative Implementation Group Issue G7 (now ASC 815-30-35-12 through 35-32). Efforts are made to match up the terms of the hypothetical and actual derivatives used as closely as possible. As a result, the amount of hedge ineffectiveness is not significant even when the terms do not match perfectly.

    Hedging total return

            Citigroup generally manages the risk associated with highly leveraged financing it has entered into by seeking to sell a majority of its exposures to the market prior to or shortly after funding. The portion of the highly leveraged financing that is retained by Citigroup is hedged with a total return swap.

            The amount of hedge ineffectiveness on the cash flow hedges recognized in earnings for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009 is not significant.

            The pretax change in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) from cash flow hedges for three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009 is presented below:

     
     Three Months ended June 30,  Six Months ended June 30,  
    In millions of dollars 2010  2009  2010  2009  

    Effective portion of cash flow hedges included in AOCI

                 

    Interest rate contracts

      $(384) $402  $(625) $570 

    Foreign exchange contracts

       (398)  233   (389)  633 

    Credit Derivatives

         (1,135)    358 
              

    Total effective portion of cash flow hedges included in AOCI

      $(782) $(500) $(1,014) $1,561 
              

    Effective portion of cash flow hedges reclassified from AOCI to earnings

                 

    Interest rate contracts

       (364) $(445) $(734) $(857)

    Foreign exchange contracts

       (103)  (65)  (281)  21 
              

    Total effective portion of cash flow hedges reclassified from AOCI to earnings(1)

      $(467) $(510) $(1,015) $(836)
              

    (1)
    Included primarily in Other revenue and Net interest revenueon the Consolidated Income Statement.

            For cash flow hedges, any changes in the fair value of the end-user derivative remaining in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) on the Consolidated Balance Sheet will be included in earnings of future periods to offset the variability of the hedged cash flows when such cash flows affect earnings. The net loss associated with cash flow hedges expected to be reclassified from Accumulated other comprehensive income within 12 months of June 30, 2010 is approximately $1.5 billion. The maximum length of time over which forecasted cash flows are hedged is 10 years.

            The impact of cash flow hedges on AOCI is also shown in Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

    156


    Net Investment Hedges

            Consistent with ASC 830-20, Foreign Currency Matters—Foreign Currency Transactions (formerly SFAS 52, Foreign Currency Translation), ASC 815 allows hedging of the foreign-currency risk of a net investment in a foreign operation. Citigroup uses foreign-currency forwards, options and swaps and foreign-currency-denominated debt instruments to manage the foreign-exchange risk associated with Citigroup's equity investments in several non-U.S. dollar functional currency foreign subsidiaries. Citigroup records the change in the carrying amount of these investments in the Cumulative translation adjustmentaccount within Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Simultaneously, the effective portion of the hedge of this exposure is also recorded in the Cumulative translation adjustment account and the ineffective portion, if any, is immediately recorded in earnings.

            For derivatives used in net investment hedges, Citigroup follows the forward-rate method from FASB Derivative Implementation Group Issue H8 (now ASC 815-35-35-16 through 35-26), "Foreign Currency Hedges: Measuring the Amount of Ineffectiveness in a Net Investment Hedge." According to that method, all changes in fair value, including changes related to the forward-rate component of the foreign-currency forward contracts and the time-value of foreign-currency options, are recorded in the foreign currency.

            Cumulative translation adjustment account. For foreign-currency denominated debt instruments that are designated as hedges of net investments, the translation gain or loss that is recorded in the foreign-currency translation adjustment account is based on the spot exchange rate between the functional currency of the respective subsidiary and the U.S. dollar, which is the functional currency of Citigroup. To the extent the notional amount of the hedging instrument exactly matches the hedged net investment and the underlying exchange rate of the derivative hedging instrument relates to the exchange rate between the functional currency of the net investment and Citigroup's functional currency (or, in the case of a non-derivative debt instrument, such instrument is denominated in the functional currency of the net investment), no ineffectiveness is recorded in earnings.

            The pretax gain (loss) recorded in foreign-currency translation adjustment within Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), related to the effective portion of the net investment hedges, is $666 million and $476 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and $(3,894) million and $(3,017) million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively.

    Credit Derivatives

            A credit derivative is a bilateral contract between a buyer and a seller under which the seller agrees to provide protection to the buyer against the credit risk of a particular entity ("reference entity" or "reference credit"). Credit derivatives generally require that the seller of credit protection make payments to the buyer upon the occurrence of predefined credit events (commonly referred to as "settlement triggers"). These settlement triggers are defined by the form of the derivative and the reference credit and are generally limited to the market standard of failure to pay on indebtedness and bankruptcy of the reference credit and, in a more limited range of transactions, debt restructuring. Credit derivative transactions referring to emerging market reference credits will also typically include additional settlement triggers to cover the acceleration of indebtedness and the risk of repudiation or a payment moratorium. In certain transactions, protection may be provided on a portfolio of referenced credits or asset-backed securities. The seller of such protection may not be required to make payment until a specified amount of losses has occurred with respect to the portfolio and/or may only be required to pay for losses up to a specified amount.

            The Company makes markets in and trades a range of credit derivatives, both on behalf of clients as well as for its own account. Through these contracts, the Company either purchases or writes protection on either a single name or a portfolio of reference credits. The Company uses credit derivatives to help mitigate credit risk in its corporate and consumer loan portfolios and other cash positions, to take proprietary trading positions, and to facilitate client transactions.

    157


            The range of credit derivatives sold includes credit default swaps, total return swaps and credit options.

            A credit default swap is a contract in which, for a fee, a protection seller agrees to reimburse a protection buyer for any losses that occur due to a credit event on a reference entity. If there is no credit default event or settlement trigger, as defined by the specific derivative contract, then the protection seller makes no payments to the protection buyer and receives only the contractually specified fee. However, if a credit event occurs as defined in the specific derivative contract sold, the protection seller will be required to make a payment to the protection buyer.

            A total return swap transfers the total economic performance of a reference asset, which includes all associated cash flows, as well as capital appreciation or depreciation. The protection buyer receives a floating rate of interest and any depreciation on the reference asset from the protection seller and, in return, the protection seller receives the cash flows associated with the reference asset plus any appreciation. Thus, according to the total return swap agreement, the protection seller will be obligated to make a payment anytime the floating interest rate payment and any depreciation of the reference asset exceed the cash flows associated with the underlying asset. A total return swap may terminate upon a default of the reference asset subject to the provisions of the related total return swap agreement between the protection seller and the protection buyer.

            A credit option is a credit derivative that allows investors to trade or hedge changes in the credit quality of the reference asset. For example, in a credit spread option, the option writer assumes the obligation to purchase or sell the reference asset at a specified "strike" spread level. The option purchaser buys the right to sell the reference asset to, or purchase it from, the option writer at the strike spread level. The payments on credit spread options depend either on a particular credit spread or the price of the underlying credit-sensitive asset. The options usually terminate if the underlying assets default.

            A credit-linked note is a form of credit derivative structured as a debt security with an embedded credit default swap. The purchaser of the note writes credit protection to the issuer, and receives a return which will be negatively affected by credit events on the underlying reference credit. If the reference entity defaults, the purchaser of the credit-linked note may assume the long position in the debt security and any future cash flows from it, but will lose the amount paid to the issuer of the credit-linked note. Thus the maximum amount of the exposure is the carrying amount of the credit-linked note. As of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the amount of credit-linked notes held by the Company in trading inventory was immaterial.

    158


            The following tables summarize the key characteristics of the Company's credit derivative portfolio as protection seller as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:

    In millions of dollars as of
    June 30, 2010
     Maximum potential
    amount of
    future payments
     Fair value
    payable(1)
     

    By industry/counterparty

           

    Bank

      $772,889  $37,164 

    Broker-dealer

       298,884   16,649 

    Non-financial

       368   50 

    Insurance and other financial institutions

       109,183   7,924 
          

    Total by industry/counterparty

      $1,181,324  $61,787 
          

    By instrument

           

    Credit default swaps and options

      $1,180,087  $61,612 

    Total return swaps and other

       1,237   175 
          

    Total by instrument

      $1,181,324  $61,787 
          

    By rating

           

    Investment grade

      $526,043   11,143 

    Non-investment grade

       543,407   38,857 

    Not rated

       111,874   11,787 
          

    Total by rating

      $1,181,324  $61,787 
          

    By maturity:

           

    Within 1 year

      $137,914  $1,291 

    From 1 to 5 years

       832,146   33,800 

    After 5 years

       211,264   26,696 
          

    Total by maturity

      $1,181,324  $61,787 
          

    (1)
    In addition, fair value amounts receivable under credit derivatives sold were $15,548 million.

    In millions of dollars as of
    December 31, 2009
     Maximum potential
    amount of
    future payments
     Fair value
    payable(1)
     

    By industry/counterparty

           

    Bank

     $807,484 $34,666 

    Broker-dealer

      340,949  16,309 

    Monoline

      33   

    Non-financial

      623  262 

    Insurance and other financial institutions

      64,964  7,025 
          

    Total by industry/counterparty

     $1,214,053 $58,262 
          

    By instrument

           

    Credit default swaps and options

     $1,213,208 $57,987 

    Total return swaps and other

      845  275 
          

    Total by instrument

     $1,214,053 $58,262 
          

    By rating

           

    Investment grade

     $576,930  9,632 

    Non-investment grade

      339,920  28,664 

    Not rated

      297,203  19,966 
          

    Total by rating

     $1,214,053 $58,262 
          

    By maturity:

           

    Within 1 year

     $165,056 $873 

    From 1 to 5 years

      806,143  30,181 

    After 5 years

      242,854  27,208 
          

    Total by maturity

     $1,214,053 $58,262 
          

    (1)
    In addition, fair value amounts receivable under credit derivatives sold were $24,234 million.

            Citigroup evaluates the payment/performance risk of the credit derivatives to which it stands as a protection seller based on the credit rating which has been assigned to the underlying referenced credit. Where external ratings by nationally recognized statistical rating organizations (such as Moody's and S&P) are used, investment grade ratings are considered to be Baa/BBB or above, while anything below is considered non-investment grade. The Citigroup internal ratings are in line with the related external credit rating system. On certain underlying reference credits, mainly related to over-the-counter credit derivatives, ratings are not available, and these are included in the not-rated category. Credit derivatives written on an underlying non-investment grade reference credit represent greater payment risk to the Company. The non-investment grade category in the table above primarily includes credit derivatives where the underlying referenced entity has been downgraded subsequent to the inception of the derivative.

            The maximum potential amount of future payments under credit derivative contracts presented in the table above is based on the notional value of the derivatives. The Company believes that the maximum potential amount of future payments for credit protection sold is not representative of the actual loss exposure based on historical experience. This amount has not been reduced by the Company's rights to the underlying assets and the related cash flows. In accordance with most credit derivative contracts, should a credit event (or settlement trigger) occur, the Company is usually liable for the difference between the protection sold and the recourse it holds in the value of the underlying assets. Thus, if the reference entity defaults, Citi will generally have a right to collect on the underlying reference credit and any related cash flows, while being liable for the full notional amount of credit protection sold to the buyer. Furthermore, this maximum potential amount of future payments for credit protection sold has not been reduced for any cash collateral paid to a given counterparty, as such payments would be calculated after netting all derivative exposures, including any credit derivatives with that counterparty in accordance with a related master netting agreement. Due to such netting processes, determining the amount of collateral that corresponds to credit derivative exposures only is not possible. The Company actively monitors open credit risk exposures, and manages this exposure by using a variety of strategies including purchased credit derivatives, cash collateral or direct holdings of the referenced assets. This risk mitigation activity is not captured in the table above.

    Credit-Risk-Related Contingent Features in Derivatives

            Certain derivative instruments contain provisions that require the Company to either post additional collateral or immediately settle any outstanding liability balances upon the occurrence of a specified credit-risk-related event. These events, which are defined by the existing derivative contracts, are primarily downgrades in the credit ratings of the Company and its affiliates. The fair value of all derivative instruments with credit-risk-related contingent features that are in a liability position at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 is $28 billion and $17 billion, respectively. The Company has posted $21 billion and $11 billion as collateral for this exposure in the normal course of business as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. Each downgrade would trigger additional collateral requirements for the Company and its affiliates. In the event that each legal entity was downgraded a single notch as of June 30, 2010, the Company would be required to post additional collateral of $2.1 billion.

    159



    16.    FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT

            SFAS 157 (now ASC 820-10) defines fair value, establishes a consistent framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure requirements about fair value measurements. Among other things, the standard requires the Company to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. In addition, it precludes the use of block discounts when measuring the fair value of instruments traded in an active market, and requires recognition of trade-date gains related to certain derivative transactions whose fair value has been determined using unobservable market inputs.

            This standard also requires that the impact of Citigroup's own credit risk on derivatives and other liabilities measured at fair value be factored into the valuation.

    Fair Value Hierarchy

            ASC 820-10 specifies a hierarchy of valuation techniques based on whether the inputs to those valuation techniques are observable or unobservable. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect the Company's market assumptions. These two types of inputs have created the following fair-value hierarchy:

      Level 1: Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets.

      Level 2: Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets.

      Level 3: Valuations derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable.

            This hierarchy requires the use of observable market data when available. The Company considers relevant and observable market prices in its valuations where possible. The frequency of transactions, the size of the bid-ask spread and the amount of adjustment necessary when comparing similar transactions are all factors in determining the liquidity of markets and the relevance of observed prices in those markets.

            The Company's policy with respect to transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy is to recognize transfers into and out of each level as of the end of the reporting period.

    Determination of Fair Value

            For assets and liabilities carried at fair value, the Company measures such value using the procedures set out below, irrespective of whether these assets and liabilities are carried at fair value as a result of an election or whether they were previously carried at fair value.

            When available, the Company generally uses quoted market prices to determine fair value and classifies such items as Level 1. In some cases where a market price is available, the Company will make use of acceptable practical expedients (such as matrix pricing) to calculate fair value, in which case the items are classified as Level 2.

            If quoted market prices are not available, fair value is based upon internally developed valuation techniques that use, where possible, current market-based or independently sourced market parameters, such as interest rates, currency rates, option volatilities, etc. Items valued using such internally generated valuation techniques are classified according to the lowest level input or value driver that is significant to the valuation. Thus, an item may be classified in Level 3 even though there may be some significant inputs that are readily observable.

            Where available, the Company may also make use of quoted prices for recent trading activity in positions with the same or similar characteristics to that being valued. The frequency and size of transactions and the amount of the bid-ask spread are among the factors considered in determining the liquidity of markets and the relevance of observed prices from those markets. If relevant and observable prices are available, those valuations would be classified as Level 2. If prices are not available, other valuation techniques would be used and the item would be classified as Level 3.

            Fair value estimates from internal valuation techniques are verified, where possible, to prices obtained from independent vendors or brokers. Vendors and brokers' valuations may be based on a variety of inputs ranging from observed prices to proprietary valuation models.

            The following section describes the valuation methodologies used by the Company to measure various financial instruments at fair value, including an indication of the level in the fair value hierarchy in which each instrument is generally classified. Where appropriate, the description includes details of the valuation models, the key inputs to those models as well as any significant assumptions.

    Securities purchased under agreements to resell and securities sold under agreements to repurchase

            No quoted prices exist for such instruments and so fair value is determined using a discounted cash-flow technique. Cash flows are estimated based on the terms of the contract, taking into account any embedded derivative or other features. Expected cash flows are discounted using market rates appropriate to the maturity of the instrument as well as the nature and amount of collateral taken or received. Generally, such instruments are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy as the inputs used in the fair valuation are readily observable.

    160


    Trading account assets and liabilities—trading securities and trading loans

            When available, the Company uses quoted market prices to determine the fair value of trading securities; such items are classified as Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. Examples include some government securities and exchange-traded equity securities.

            For bonds and secondary market loans traded over the counter, the Company generally determines fair value utilizing internal valuation techniques. Fair value estimates from internal valuation techniques are verified, where possible, to prices obtained from independent vendors. Vendors compile prices from various sources and may apply matrix pricing for similar bonds or loans where no price is observable. If available, the Company may also use quoted prices for recent trading activity of assets with similar characteristics to the bond or loan being valued. Trading securities and loans priced using such methods are generally classified as Level 2. However, when less liquidity exists for a security or loan, a quoted price is stale or prices from independent sources vary, a loan or security is generally classified as Level 3.

            Where the Company's principal market for a portfolio of loans is the securitization market, the Company uses the securitization price to determine the fair value of the portfolio. The securitization price is determined from the assumed proceeds of a hypothetical securitization in the current market, adjusted for transformation costs (i.e., direct costs other than transaction costs) and securitization uncertainties such as market conditions and liquidity. As a result of the severe reduction in the level of activity in certain securitization markets since the second half of 2007, observable securitization prices for certain directly comparable portfolios of loans have not been readily available. Therefore, such portfolios of loans are generally classified as Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. However, for other loan securitization markets, such as those related to conforming prime fixed-rate and conforming adjustable-rate mortgage loans, pricing verification of the hypothetical securitizations has been possible, since these markets have remained active. Accordingly, these loan portfolios are classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.

    Trading account assets and liabilities—derivatives

            Exchange-traded derivatives are generally fair valued using quoted market (i.e., exchange) prices and so are classified as Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.

            The majority of derivatives entered into by the Company are executed over the counter and so are valued using internal valuation techniques as no quoted market prices exist for such instruments. The valuation techniques and inputs depend on the type of derivative and the nature of the underlying instrument. The principal techniques used to value these instruments are discounted cash flows, Black-Scholes and Monte Carlo simulation. The fair values of derivative contracts reflect cash the Company has paid or received (for example, option premiums paid and received).

            The key inputs depend upon the type of derivative and the nature of the underlying instrument and include interest rate yield curves, foreign-exchange rates, the spot price of the underlying volatility and correlation. The item is placed in either Level 2 or Level 3 depending on the observability of the significant inputs to the model. Correlation and items with longer tenors are generally less observable.

    Subprime-related direct exposures in CDOs

            The valuation of the high-grade and mezzanine ABS CDO positions uses trader prices based on the underlying assets of each high-grade and mezzanine ABS CDO. The high-grade and mezzanine positions are now largely hedged through the ABX and bond short positions, which are trader priced. This results in closer symmetry in the way these long and short positions are valued by the Company. Citigroup intends to use trader marks to value this portion of the portfolio going forward so long as it remains largely hedged.

            For most of the lending and structuring direct subprime exposures, fair value is determined utilizing observable transactions where available, other market data for similar assets in markets that are not active and other internal valuation techniques.

    Investments

            The investments category includes available-for-sale debt and marketable equity securities, whose fair value is determined using the same procedures described for trading securities above or, in some cases, using vendor prices as the primary source.

            Also included in investments are nonpublic investments in private equity and real estate entities held by the S&B business. Determining the fair value of nonpublic securities involves a significant degree of management resources and judgment as no quoted prices exist and such securities are generally very thinly traded. In addition, there may be transfer restrictions on private equity securities. The Company uses an established process for determining the fair value of such securities, using commonly accepted valuation techniques, including the use of earnings multiples based on comparable public securities, industry-specific non-earnings-based multiples and discounted cash flow models. In determining the fair value of nonpublic securities, the Company also considers events such as a proposed sale of the investee company, initial public offerings, equity issuances, or other observable transactions.

            Private equity securities are generally classified as Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

    Short-term borrowings and long-term debt

            Where fair value accounting has been elected, the fair value of non-structured liabilities is determined by discounting expected cash flows using the appropriate discount rate for the applicable maturity. Such instruments are generally classified as Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy as all inputs are readily observable.

    161


            The Company determines the fair value of structured liabilities (where performance is linked to structured interest rates, inflation or currency risks) and hybrid financial instruments (performance linked to risks other than interest rates, inflation or currency risks) using the appropriate derivative valuation methodology (described above) given the nature of the embedded risk profile. Such instruments are classified as Level 2 or Level 3 depending on the observability of significant inputs to the model.

    Market valuation adjustments

            Liquidity adjustments are applied to items in Level 2 and Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy to ensure that the fair value reflects the price at which the entire position could be liquidated. The liquidity reserve is based on the bid-offer spread for an instrument, adjusted to take into account the size of the position.

            Counterparty credit-risk adjustments are applied to derivatives, such as over-the-counter derivatives, where the base valuation uses market parameters based on the LIBOR interest rate curves. Not all counterparties have the same credit risk as that implied by the relevant LIBOR curve, so it is necessary to consider the market view of the credit risk of a counterparty in order to estimate the fair value of such an item.

            Bilateral or "own" credit-risk adjustments are applied to reflect the Company's own credit risk when valuing derivatives and liabilities measured at fair value. Counterparty and own credit adjustments consider the expected future cash flows between Citi and its counterparties under the terms of the instrument and the effect of credit risk on the valuation of those cash flows, rather than a point-in-time assessment of the current recognized net asset or liability. Furthermore, the credit-risk adjustments take into account the effect of credit-risk mitigants, such as pledged collateral and any legal right of offset (to the extent such offset exists) with a counterparty through arrangements such as netting agreements.

    Auction rate securities

            Auction rate securities (ARS) are long-term municipal bonds, corporate bonds, securitizations and preferred stocks with interest rates or dividend yields that are reset through periodic auctions. The coupon paid in the current period is based on the rate determined by the prior auction. In the event of an auction failure, ARS holders receive a "fail rate" coupon, which is specified by the original issue documentation of each ARS.

            Where insufficient orders to purchase all of the ARS issue to be sold in an auction were received, the primary dealer or auction agent would traditionally have purchased any residual unsold inventory (without a contractual obligation to do so). This residual inventory would then be repaid through subsequent auctions, typically in a short timeframe. Due to this auction mechanism and generally liquid market, ARS have historically traded and were valued as short-term instruments.

            Citigroup acted in the capacity of primary dealer for approximately $72 billion of ARS and continued to purchase residual unsold inventory in support of the auction mechanism until mid-February 2008. After this date, liquidity in the ARS market deteriorated significantly, auctions failed due to a lack of bids from third-party investors and Citigroup ceased to purchase unsold inventory. Following a number of ARS refinancings, at June 30, 2010, Citigroup continued to act in the capacity of primary dealer for approximately $25.9 billion of outstanding ARS.

            The Company classifies its ARS as held-to-maturity, available-for-sale and trading securities.

            Prior to the Company's first auction's failing in the first quarter of 2008, Citigroup valued ARS based on observation of auction market prices, because the auctions had a short maturity period (7, 28 and 35 days). This generally resulted in valuations at par. Once the auctions failed, ARS could no longer be valued using observation of auction market prices. Accordingly, the fair value of ARS is currently estimated using internally developed discounted cash flow valuation techniques specific to the nature of the assets underlying each ARS.

            For ARS with U.S. municipal securities as underlying assets, future cash flows are estimated based on the terms of the securities underlying each individual ARS and discounted at an estimated discount rate in order to estimate the current fair value. The key assumptions that impact the ARS valuations are estimated prepayments and refinancings, estimated fail rate coupons (i.e., the rate paid in the event of auction failure, which varies according to the current credit rating of the issuer) and the discount rate used to calculate the present value of projected cash flows. The discount rate used for each ARS is based on rates observed for straight issuances of other municipal securities. In order to arrive at the appropriate discount rate, these observed rates were adjusted upward to factor in the specifics of the ARS structure being valued, such as callability, and the illiquidity in the ARS market.

            For ARS with student loans as underlying assets, future cash flows are estimated based on the terms of the loans underlying each individual ARS, discounted at an appropriate rate in order to estimate the current fair value. The key assumptions that impact the ARS valuations are the expected weighted average life of the structure, estimated fail rate coupons, the amount of leverage in each structure and the discount rate used to calculate the present value of projected cash flows. The discount rate used for each ARS is based on rates observed for basic securitizations with similar maturities to the loans underlying each ARS being valued. In order to arrive at the appropriate discount rate, these observed rates were adjusted upward to factor in the specifics of the ARS structure being valued, such as callability, and the illiquidity in the ARS market.

            The majority of ARS continue to be classified as Level 3.

    Alt-A mortgage securities

            The Company classifies its Alt-A mortgage securities as held-to-maturity, available-for-sale and trading investments. The securities classified as trading and available-for-sale are recorded at fair value with changes in fair value reported in current earnings and AOCI, respectively. For these purposes, Alt-A mortgage securities are non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) where (1) the underlying collateral has weighted average FICO scores between 680 and 720 or (2) for instances where FICO scores are greater than 720, RMBS have 30% or less of the underlying collateral composed of full documentation loans.

            Similar to the valuation methodologies used for other trading securities and trading loans, the Company generally

    162


    determines the fair value of Alt-A mortgage securities utilizing internal valuation techniques. Fair-value estimates from internal valuation techniques are verified, where possible, to prices obtained from independent vendors. Vendors compile prices from various sources. Where available, the Company may also make use of quoted prices for recent trading activity in securities with the same or similar characteristics to that being valued.

            The internal valuation techniques used for Alt-A mortgage securities, as with other mortgage exposures, consider estimated housing price changes, unemployment rates, interest rates and borrower attributes. They also consider prepayment rates as well as other market indicators.

            Alt-A mortgage securities that are valued using these methods are generally classified as Level 2. However, Alt-A mortgage securities backed by Alt-A mortgages of lower quality or more recent vintages are mostly classified as Level 3 due to the reduced liquidity that exists for such positions, which reduces the reliability of prices available from independent sources.

    Commercial real estate exposure

            Citigroup reports a number of different exposures linked to commercial real estate at fair value with changes in fair value reported in earnings, including securities, loans and investments in entities that hold commercial real estate loans or commercial real estate directly. The Company also reports securities backed by commercial real estate as available-for-sale investments, which are carried at fair value with changes in fair-value reported in AOCI.

            Similar to the valuation methodologies used for other trading securities and trading loans, the Company generally determines the fair value of securities and loans linked to commercial real estate utilizing internal valuation techniques. Fair-value estimates from internal valuation techniques are verified, where possible, to prices obtained from independent vendors. Vendors compile prices from various sources. Where available, the Company may also make use of quoted prices for recent trading activity in securities or loans with the same or similar characteristics to those being valued. Securities and loans linked to commercial real estate valued using these methodologies are generally classified as Level 3 as a result of the reduced liquidity currently in the market for such exposures.

            The fair value of investments in entities that hold commercial real estate loans or commercial real estate directly is determined using a similar methodology to that used for other non-public investments in real estate held by the S&B business. The Company uses an established process for determining the fair value of such securities, using commonly accepted valuation techniques, including the use of earnings multiples based on comparable public securities, industry-specific non-earnings-based multiples and discounted cash flow models. In determining the fair value of such investments, the Company also considers events, such as a proposed sale of the investee company, initial public offerings, equity issuances, or other observable transactions. Such investments are generally classified as Level 3 of the fair-value hierarchy.

    163


    Items Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

            The following tables present for each of the fair-value hierarchy levels the Company's assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The Company often hedges positions that have been classified in the Level 3 category with financial instruments that have been classified as Level 1 or Level 2. In addition, the Company also hedges items classified in the Level 3 category with instruments classified in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. The effects of these hedges are presented gross in the following tables, as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:

    In millions of dollars at June 30, 2010  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3  Gross
    inventory
     Netting(1)  Net
    balance
     

    Assets

                       

    Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell

      $ $128,112 $6,518 $134,630 $(36,531)$98,099 

    Trading securities

                       
     

    Trading mortgage-backed securities

                       
      

    U.S. government sponsored

      $ $24,153 $758 $24,911 $ $24,911 
      

    Prime

        1,053  610  1,663    1,663 
      

    Alt-A

        948  451  1,399    1,399 
      

    Subprime

        626  1,885  2,511    2,511 
      

    Non-U.S. residential

        2,144  234  2,378    2,378 
      

    Commercial

        1,045  2,184  3,229    3,229 
                  
     

    Total trading mortgage-backed securities

      $ $29,969 $6,122 $36,091 $ $36,091 
                  
     

    U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

                       
      

    U.S. Treasury

      $21,129 $512 $ $21,641 $ $21,641 
      

    Agency obligations

        4,184    4,184    4,184 
                  
     

    Total U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

      $21,129 $4,696 $ $25,825 $ $25,825 
                  
     

    State and municipal

      $ $6,589 $57 $6,646 $ $6,646 
     

    Foreign government

       62,605  17,513  386  80,504    80,504 
     

    Corporate

        42,921  6,211  49,132    49,132 
     

    Equity securities

       26,665  7,522  533  34,720    34,720 
     

    Asset-backed securities

        1,750  4,202  5,952     5,952 
     

    Other debt securities

        12,974  1,047  14,021    14,021 
                  
     

    Total trading securities

      $110,399 $123,934 $18,558 $252,891 $ $252,891 
                  
     

    Derivatives

                       
      

    Interest rate contracts

      $614 $586,605 $2,977 $590,196       
      

    Foreign exchange contracts

       4  81,275  879  82,158       
      

    Equity contracts

       3,030  15,429  1,967  20,426       
      

    Commodity and other contracts

       581  11,519  899  12,999       
      

    Credit derivatives

        70,544  14,443  84,987       
                    
     

    Total gross derivatives

      $4,229 $765,372 $21,165 $790,766       
     

    Cash collateral paid

               49,035       
     

    Netting agreements and market value adjustments

                 $(783,280)   
                  
     

    Total derivatives

      $4,229 $765,372 $21,165 $839,801 $(783,280)$56,521 
                  

    Investments

                       
     

    Mortgage-backed securities

                       
      

    U.S. government sponsored

      $82 $20,315 $1 $20,398 $ $20,398 
      

    Prime

        4,886  772  5,658    5,658 
      

    Alt-A

        505  205  710    710 
      

    Subprime

        109  14  123    123 
      

    Non-U.S. residential

        1,647  814  2,461    2,461 
      

    Commercial

        81  558  639    639 
                  
     

    Total investment mortgage-backed securities

     $82 $27,543 $2,364 $29,989 $ $29,989 
                  
     

    U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities

                       
      

    U.S. Treasury

     $12,938 $26,722 $ $39,660 $ $39,660 
      

    Agency obligations

        44,551  19  44,570     44,570 
                  
     

    Total U.S. Treasury and federal agency

     $12,938 $71,273 $19 $84,230 $ $84,230 
                  

    164


    In millions of dollars at June 30, 2010  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3  Gross
    inventory
     Netting(1)  Net
    balance
     
     

    State and municipal

      $  $15,117  $457  $15,574    $15,574 
     

    Foreign government

       51,467   47,122   282   98,871     98,871 
     

    Corporate

         15,224   1,271   16,495     16,495 
     

    Equity securities

       3,190   180   2,238   5,608     5,608 
     

    Asset-backed securities

         5,649   12,303   17,952     17,952 
     

    Other debt securities

         1,303   891   2,194     2,194 
     

    Non-marketable equity securities

         137   6,561   6,698     6,698 
                  

    Total investments

      $67,677  $183,548  $26,386  $277,611    $277,611 
                  

    Loans(2)

      $   1,310  $3,668   4,978    $4,978 

    MSRs

           4,894   4,894     4,894 

    Other financial assets measured on a recurring basis

         17,203   3,089   20,292   (1,576)  18,716 
                  

    Total assets

      $182,305  $1,219,479  $84,278  $1,535,097  $(821,387) $713,710 

    Total as a percentage of gross assets(3)

       12.3%  82.1%  5.6%  100.0%      
                  

    Liabilities

                       

    Interest-bearing deposits

      $  $1,204  $183  $1,387  $  $1,387 

    Federal funds purchased and securities loaned
    or sold under agreements to repurchase

         154,722   1,091   155,813   (36,531)  119,282 

    Trading account liabilities

                       
     

    Securities sold, not yet purchased

       57,025   14,082   621   71,728     71,728 
     

    Derivatives

                       
      

    Interest rate contracts

       569   581,092   2,402   584,063       
      

    Foreign exchange contracts

       18   84,803   629   85,450       
      

    Equity contracts

       3,406   31,731   3,200   38,337       
      

    Commodity and other contracts

       505   11,179   1,423   13,107       
      

    Credit derivatives

         65,020   12,370   77,390       
                    
     

    Total gross derivatives

      $4,498  $773,825  $20,024  $798,347       
     

    Cash collateral received

                39,216       
     

    Netting agreements and market value adjustments

                   (778,290)   
                  
     

    Total derivatives

      $4,498  $773,825  $20,024  $837,563  $(778,290) $59,273 

    Short-term borrowings

         1,205   445   1,650      1,650 

    Long-term debt

         15,117   10,741   25,858      25,858 

    Other financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis

       1   12,773   7   12,781   (1,576)  11,205 
                  

    Total liabilities

      $61,524  $972,928  $33,112  $1,106,780  $(816,397) $290,383 

    Total as a percentage of gross liabilities(3)

       5.8%  91.1%  3.1%  100.0%      
                  

    (1)
    Represents netting of: (i) the amounts due under securities purchased under agreements to resell and the amounts owed under securities sold under agreements to repurchase, and (ii) derivative exposures covered by a qualifying master netting agreement, cash collateral and the market value adjustment.

    (2)
    There is no allowance for loan losses recorded for loans reported at fair value.

    (3)
    Percentage is calculated based on total assets and liabilities excluding collateral received/paid on derivatives.

    165


    In millions of dollars at December 31, 2009  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3  Gross
    inventory
     Netting(1)  Net
    balance
     

    ASSETS

                       

    Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or
    purchased under agreements to resell

      $  $138,550  $  $138,550  $(50,713) $87,837 

    Trading securities

                       
     

    Trading mortgage-backed securities

                       
      

    U.S. government-sponsored agency guaranteed

      $  $19,666  $972  $20,638  $  $20,638 
      

    Prime

         772   384   1,156     1,156 
      

    Alt-A

         842   387   1,229     1,229 
      

    Subprime

         736   8,998   9,734     9,734 
      

    Non-U.S. residential

         1,796   572   2,368     2,368 
      

    Commercial

         1,004   2,451   3,455     3,455 
                  
     

    Total trading mortgage-backed securities

      $  $24,816  $13,764  $38,580  $  $38,580 
                  
     

    U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

                       
      

    U.S. Treasury

      $27,943  $995  $  $28,938  $  $28,938 
      

    Agency obligations

         2,041    $2,041     2,041 
                  
     

    Total U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

      $27,943  $3,036  $  $30,979  $  $30,979 
                  
     

    Other trading securities

                       
     

    State and municipal

      $  $6,925  $222  $7,147  $  $7,147 
     

    Foreign government

       59,229   13,081   459   72,769     72,769 
     

    Corporate

         43,365   8,620   51,985     51,985 
     

    Equity securities

       33,754   11,827   640   46,221     46,221 
     

    Other debt securities

         19,976   16,237   36,213     36,213 
                  

    Total trading securities

      $120,926  $123,026  $39,942  $283,894  $  $283,894 
                  

    Total derivatives(2)

      $4,002  $671,532  $27,685  $703,219  $(644,340) $58,879 
                  

    Investments

                       
     

    Mortgage-backed securities

                       
      

    U.S. government-sponsored agency guaranteed

      $89  $20,823  $2  $20,914  $  $20,914 
      

    Prime

         5,742   736   6,478     6,478 
      

    Alt-A

         572   55   627     627 
      

    Subprime

           1   1     1 
      

    Non-U.S. residential

         255     255     255 
      

    Commercial

         47   746   793     793 
                  
     

    Total investment mortgage-backed securities

      $89  $27,439  $1,540  $29,068  $  $29,068 
                  
     

    U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities

                       
      

    U.S. Treasury

      $5,943  $20,619  $  $26,562  $  $26,562 
      

    Agency obligations

         27,531   21   27,552     27,552 
                  
     

    Total U.S. Treasury and federal agency

      $5,943  $48,150  $21  $54,114  $  $54,114 
                  
     

    State and municipal

      $  $15,393  $217  $15,610  $  $15,610 
     

    Foreign government

       60,484   41,765   270   102,519     102,519 
     

    Corporate

         19,056   1,257   20,313     20,313 
     

    Equity securities

       3,056   237   2,513   5,806     5,806 
     

    Other debt securities

         3,337   8,832   12,169     12,169 
     

    Non-marketable equity securities

         77   6,753   6,830     6,830 
                  

    Total investments

      $69,572  $155,454  $21,403  $246,429  $  $246,429 
                  

    Loans(3)

      $  $1,226  $213  $1,439  $  $1,439 

    MSRs

           6,530   6,530     6,530 

                       

    166


    In millions of dollars at December 31, 2009  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3  Gross
    inventory
     Netting(1)  Net
    balance
     

    Other financial assets measured on a recurring basis

         15,787   1,101   16,888   (4,224)  12,664 
                  

    Total assets

      $194,500  $1,105,575  $96,874  $1,396,949  $(699,277) $697,672 

       13.9%  79.2%  6.9%  100.0%      
                  

    In millions of dollars at December 31, 2009  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3  Gross
    inventory
     Netting(1)  Net
    balance
     

    LIABILITIES

                       

    Interest-bearing deposits

      $  $1,517  $28  $1,545  $  $1,545 

    Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase

         152,687   2,056   154,743   (50,713)  104,030 

    Trading account liabilities

                       
     

    Securities sold, not yet purchased

       52,399   20,233   774   73,406     73,406 
     

    Derivatives(2)

       4,980   669,384   24,577   698,941   (634,835)  64,106 

    Short-term borrowings

         408   231   639     639 

    Long-term debt

         16,288   9,654   25,942     25,942 

    Other financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis

         15,753   13   15,766   (4,224)  11,542 
                  

    Total liabilities

      $57,379  $876,270  $37,333  $970,982  $(689,772) $281,210 

       5.9%  90.2%  3.8%  100.0%      
                  

    (1)
    Represents netting of: (i) the amounts due under securities purchased under agreements to resell and the amounts owed under securities sold under agreements to repurchase, and (ii) derivative exposures covered by a qualifying master netting agreement, cash collateral, and the market value adjustment.

    (2)
    Cash collateral paid/received is included in Level 2 derivative assets/liabilities, as it is primarily related to derivative positions classified in Level 2.

    (3)
    There is no allowance for loan losses recorded for loans reported at fair value.

    167



    Changes in Level 3 Fair-Value Category

            The following tables present the changes in the Level 3 fair-value category. The Company classifies financial instruments in Level 3 of the fair-value hierarchy when there is reliance on at least one significant unobservable input to the valuation model. In addition to these unobservable inputs, the valuation models for Level 3 financial instruments typically also rely on a number of inputs that are readily observable either directly or indirectly. Thus, the gains and losses presented below include changes in the fair value related to both observable and unobservable inputs.

            The Company often hedges positions with offsetting positions that are classified in a different level. For example, the gains and losses for assets and liabilities in the Level 3 category presented in the tables below do not reflect the effect of offsetting losses and gains on hedging instruments that have been classified by the Company in the Level 1 and Level 2 categories. In addition, the Company hedges items classified in the Level 3 category with instruments also classified in Level 3 of the fair-value hierarchy. The effects of these hedges are presented gross in the following tables.

     
      
     Net realized/ unrealized
    gains (losses) included in
      
      
      
      
     
     
      
     Transfers
    in and/or
    out of
    Level 3
     Purchases,
    issuances
    and
    settlements
      
     Unrealized
    gains
    (losses)
    still held(3)
     
    In millions of dollars March 31,
    2010
     Principal
    transactions
     Other(1)(2)  June 30,
    2010
     

    Assets

                          

    Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell

     $1,907 $446 $ $4,165 $ $6,518 $ 

    Trading securities

                          
     

    Trading mortgage-backed securities

                          
       

    U.S. government sponsored

     $947 $(107)$ $71 $(153)$758 $(123)
       

    Prime

      399  (2)   67  146  610  (20)
       

    Alt-A

      321  15    100  15  451  45 
       

    Subprime

      6,525  (697)   126  (4,069) 1,885  (1,890)
       

    Non-U.S. residential

      243  14    20  (43) 234  (4)
       

    Commercial

      2,215  1    (142) 110  2,184  2 
                    
     

    Total trading mortgage-backed securities

     $10,650 $(776)$ $242 $(3,994)$6,122 $(1,990)
                    
     

    State and municipal

     $453 $8 $ $(129)$(275)$57 $ 
     

    Foreign government

      644  (15)   11  (254) 386  (20)
     

    Corporate

      7,950  (74)   (144) (1,521) 6,211  (114)
     

    Equity securities

      905  10    (338) (44) 533  26 
     

    Asset-backed securities

      4,200  (16)   74  (56) 4,202  (242)
     

    Other debt securities

      1,129  (72)   (48) 38  1,047  (4)
                    

    Total trading securities

     $25,931 $(935)$ $(332)$(6,106)$18,558 $(2,344)
                    

    Derivatives, net(4)

                          
      

    Interest rate contracts

     $339 $190 $ $(175)$221 $575 $481 
      

    Foreign exchange contracts

      33  206    (1) 12  250  249 
      

    Equity contracts

      (1,420) (48)   (51) 286  (1,233) (307)
      

    Commodity and other contracts

      (645) 85    38  (2) (524) 22 
      

    Credit derivatives

      5,029  (1,421)   (358) (1,177) 2,073  (1,546)
                    

    Total derivatives, net(4)

     $3,336 $(988)$ $(547)$(660)$1,141 $(1,101)
                    

    Investments

                          
     

    Mortgage-backed securities

                          
       

    U.S. government-sponsored agency guaranteed

     $1 $ $ $ $ $1 $ 
       

    Prime

      276    (16) 575  (63) 772  (2)
       

    Alt-A

      30      190  (15) 205   
       

    Subprime

      1    (1) 14    14   
       

    Non-U.S. Residential

            814    814  5 
       

    Commercial

      546    13  1  (2) 558   
                    
     

    Total investment mortgage-backed debt securities

     $854 $ $(4)$1,594 $(80)$2,364 $3 
                    

    U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

                          
     

    Agency obligations

     $19 $ $ $ $ $19 $ 
                    

    Total U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

     $19 $ $ $ $ $19 $ 
                    
     

    State and municipal

     $262 $ $6 $233 $(44)$457 $ 
     

    Foreign government

      287    (1) (27) 23  282  (14)
     

    Corporate

      1,062    (5) 295  (81) 1,271  (8)
     

    Equity securities

      2,468    14  1  (245) 2,238   
     

    Asset-backed securities

      7,936    (6) 4,802  (429) 12,303  (41)
     

    Other debt securities

      1,007    20  (42) (94) 891  31 
     

    Non-marketable equity securities

      8,613    (2) (2,077) 27  6,561  (60)
                    

    Total investments

     $22,508 $ $22 $4,779 $(923)$26,386 $(89)
                    

     

    168


     
      
     Net realized/ unrealized
    gains (losses) included in
      
      
      
      
     
     
      
     Transfers
    in and/or
    out of
    Level 3
     Purchases,
    issuances
    and
    settlements
      
     Unrealized
    gains
    (losses)
    still held(3)
     
    In millions of dollars March 31,
    2010
     Principal
    transactions
     Other(1)(2)  June 30,
    2010
     

    Loans

     $4,395 $ $(296)$(5)$(426)$3,668 $(288)

    MSRs

      6,439    (1,342)   (203) 4,894  (1,342)

    Other financial assets measured on a recurring basis

      907    (35) 1,996  221  3,089  (35)
                    

    Liabilities

                          

    Interest-bearing deposits

     $158 $ $(4)$(4)$25 $183 $36 

    Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase

      975  (99)   76  (59) 1,091  (110)

    Trading account liabilities

                          
     

    Securities sold, not yet purchased

      148  33    509  (3) 621  103 

    Short-term borrowings

      258  18    12  193  445  (13)

    Long-term debt

      12,836  126  290  (150) (1,529) 10,741  184 

    Other financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis

      2    (14)   (9) 7  (7)
                    

     

     
      
     Net realized/ unrealized
    gains (losses) included in
      
      
      
      
     
     
      
     Transfers
    in and/or
    out of
    Level 3
     Purchases,
    issuances
    and
    settlements
      
     Unrealized
    gains
    (losses)
    still held(3)
     
    In millions of dollars December 31,
    2009
     Principal
    transactions
     Other(1)(2)  June 30,
    2010
     

    Assets

                          

    Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell

     $ $509 $ $5,217 $792 $6,518 $ 

    Trading securities

                          
     

    Trading mortgage-backed securities

                          
       

    U.S. government sponsored

     $972 $(158)$ $169 $(225)$758 $(120)
       

    Prime

      384  33    150  43  610  (7)
       

    Alt-A

      387  30    160  (126) 451  54 
       

    Subprime

      8,998  36    (625) (6,524) 1,885  (1,861)
       

    Non-U.S. residential

      572  (27)   (259) (52) 234  1 
       

    Commercial

      2,451  (11)   (183) (73) 2,184  48 
                    
     

    Total trading mortgage-backed securities

     $13,764 $(97)$ $(588)$(6,957)$6,122 $(1,885)
                    
     

    State and municipal

     $222 $11 $ $56  (232)$57 $ 
     

    Foreign government

      459  11    (186) 102  386  (5)
     

    Corporate

      8,620  (75)   (483) (1,851) 6,211  (107)
     

    Equity securities

      640  16    (12) (111) 533  50 
     

    Asset-backed securities

      3,006  (77)   44  1,229  4,202  (266)
     

    Other debt securities

      13,231  23    (255) (11,952) 1,047  (3)
                    

    Total trading securities

     $39,942 $(188)$ $(1,424)$(19,771)$18,558 $(2,216)
                    

    Derivatives, net(4)

                          
      

    Interest rate contracts

     $(374)$665 $ $337 $(53)$575 $447 
      

    Foreign exchange contracts

      (38) 344    (98) 42  250  362 
      

    Equity contracts

      (1,110) (227)   (282) 386  (1,233) (558)
      

    Commodity and other contracts

      (529) (116)   68  53  (524) (444)
      

    Credit derivatives

      5,159  (1,275)   (875) (936) 2,073  (1,922)
                    

    Total derivatives, net(4)

     $3,108 $(609)$ $(850)$(508)$1,141 $(2,115)
                    

    Investments

                          
     

    Mortgage-backed securities

                          
       

    U.S. government-sponsored agency guaranteed

     $2 $ $(1)$ $ $1 $ 
       

    Prime

      736    (113) 70  79  772  23 
       

    Alt-A

      55    (23) 190  (17) 205  17 
       

    Subprime

      1    (1) 14    14   
       

    Non-U.S. Residential

             814    814  8 
       

    Commercial

      746    (449) 2  259  558   
                    
     

    Total investment mortgage-backed debt securities

     $1,540 $ $(587)$1,090 $321 $2,364 $48 
                    

     

    169


     
      
     Net realized/ unrealized
    gains (losses) included in
      
      
      
      
     
     
      
     Transfers
    in and/or
    out of
    Level 3
     Purchases,
    issuances
    and
    settlements
      
     Unrealized
    gains
    (losses)
    still held(3)
     
    In millions of dollars December 31,
    2009
     Principal
    transactions
     Other(1)(2)  June 30,
    2010
     

    U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

                          
     

    Agency obligations

     $21 $ $(21)$ $19 $19 $(1)
                    

    Total U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

     $21 $ $(21)$ $19 $19 $(1)
                    
     

    State and municipal

     $217 $ $7 $233 $ $457 $ 
     

    Foreign government

      270    7  (10) 15  282  2 
     

    Corporate

      1,257    (79) 236  (143) 1,271  20 
     

    Equity securities

      2,513    26  90  (391) 2,238   
     

    Asset-backed securities

      8,272    (36) 4,818  (751) 12,303  (95)
     

    Other debt securities

      560    27  (36) 340  891  40 
     

    Non-marketable equity securities

      6,753    15  (108) (99) 6,561  (53)
                    

    Total investments

     $21,403 $ $(641)$6,313 $(689)$26,386 $(39)
                    

    Loans

     $213 $ $(140)$615 $2,980 $3,668 $(144)

    MSRs

      6,530    (1,198)   (438) 4,894  (1,198)

    Other financial assets measured on a recurring basis

      1,101    (27) 1,983  32  3,089  (27)
                    

    Liabilities

                          

    Interest-bearing deposits

     $28 $ $2 $(6)$163 $183 $(13)

    Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase

      2,056  (98)   (976) (87) 1,091  (166)

    Trading account liabilities

                          
     

    Securities sold, not yet purchased

      774  52    (69) (32) 621  56 

    Short-term borrowings

      231  8    (106) 328  445  14 

    Long-term debt

      9,654  272  145  332  1,172  10,741  74 

    Other financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis

      13    (19)   (25) 7  (7)
                    

     

     
      
     Net realized/ unrealized
    gains (losses) included in
      
      
      
      
     
     
      
     Transfers
    in and/or
    out of
    Level 3
     Purchases,
    issuances
    and
    settlements
      
     Unrealized
    gains
    (losses)
    still held(3)
     
    In millions of dollars March 31,
    2009
     Principal
    transactions
     Other(1)(2)  June 30,
    2009
     

    Assets

                          

    Trading securities

                          
     

    Trading mortgage-backed securities

                          
      

    U.S. government sponsored

     $1,316 $244 $ $ $(316)$1,244 $268 
      

    Prime

      582  (20)     61  623  (20)
      

    Alt-A

      1,250  (50)     (423) 777  (49)
      

    Subprime

      10,386  667      (1,052) 10,001  645 
      

    Non-U.S. residential

      325  (42)     62  345  (34)
      

    Commercial

      2,883  5      (80) 2,808  (26)
                    
     

    Total trading mortgage-backed securities

     $16,742 $804 $ $ $(1,748)$15,798 $784 
                    
     

    U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

                          
      

    U.S. Treasury

     $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 
      

    Agency obligations

      51      (3) 1  49   
                    
     

    Total U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

     $51 $ $ $(3)$1 $49 $ 
                    
     

    State and municipal

     $198 $(23)$ $(136)$70 $109 $(23)
     

    Foreign government

      1,011  60    (390) (91) 590  20 
     

    Corporate

      9,382  221    249  (417) 9,435  245 
     

    Equity securities

      1,740  112    104  (90) 1,866  174 
     

    Other debt securities

      13,746  338    109  2,653  16,846  222 
                    

    Total trading securities

     $42,870 $1,512 $ $(67)$378 $44,693 $1,422 
                    

    Derivatives, net(4)

     $3,539 $(2,492)$ $364 $(231)$1,180 $(2,678)
                    

    Investments

                          
     

    Mortgage-backed securities

                          
      

    U.S. government sponsored

     $ $ $ $75 $3 $78 $(2)
      

    Prime

      1,125    159  (171) (338) 775  109 

     

    170


     
      
     Net realized/ unrealized
    gains (losses) included in
      
      
      
      
     
     
      
     Transfers
    in and/or
    out of
    Level 3
     Purchases,
    issuances
    and
    settlements
      
     Unrealized
    gains
    (losses)
    still held(3)
     
    In millions of dollars March 31,
    2009
     Principal
    transactions
     Other(1)(2)  June 30,
    2009
     
      

    Alt-A

      177    40  55  (1) 271  29 
      

    Subprime

      12    (3) (10) 18  17  (3)
      

    Commercial

      469    28  (61) 283  719  28 
                    
     

    Total investment mortgage-backed debt securities

     $1,783 $ $224 $(112)$(35)$1,860 $161 
                    
     

    U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

                          
      

    U.S. Treasury

     $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 
      

    Agency obligations

            9    9   
                    
     

    Total U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

     $ $ $ $9 $ $9 $ 
                    
     

    State and municipal

     $207 $ $ $45 $ $252 $ 
     

    Foreign government

      643      (474) (1) 168   
     

    Corporate

      992    67  (99) 728  1,688  35 
     

    Equity securities

      2,849    49  (7) (73) 2,818  49 
     

    Other debt securities

      8,742    1,243  (386) (1,170) 8,429  1,261 
     

    Non-marketable equity securities

      7,479    21  619  (319) 7,800  21 
                    

    Total investments

     $22,695 $ $1,604 $(405)$(870)$23,024 $1,527 
                    

    Loans

     $171 $ $24 $ $1 $196 $25 

    MSRs

      5,481    1,310    (21) 6,770  1,310 

    Other financial assets measured on a recurring basis

      2,515    (1,107) 329  (92) 1,645 $(1,107)
                    

    Liabilities

                          

    Interest-bearing deposits

     $41 $ $(63)$ $8 $112 $(63)

    Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase

      10,732  276    (3,391) 139  7,204  264 

    Trading account liabilities

                          
     

    Securities sold, not yet purchased

      1,311  8    (434) 92  961  8 

    Short-term borrowings

      1,030  43    (49) (561) 377  43 

    Long-term debt

      10,438  (412)   51  300  11,201  (376)

    Other financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis

      1    (42)   (24) 19  (19)
                    

     

     
      
     Net realized/ unrealized
    gains (losses) included in
      
      
      
      
     
     
      
     Transfers
    in and/or
    out of
    Level 3
     Purchases,
    issuances
    and
    settlements
      
     Unrealized
    gains
    (losses)
    still held(3)
     
    In millions of dollars December 31,
    2008
     Principal
    transactions
     Other(1)(2)  June 30,
    2009
     

    Assets

                          

    Trading securities

                          
     

    Trading mortgage-backed securities

                          
      

    U.S. government sponsored

     $1,325 $216 $ $10 $(307)$1,244 $245 
      

    Prime

      147  (55)   439  92  623  15 
      

    Alt-A

      1,153  (119)   (187) (70) 777  (119)
      

    Subprime

      13,844  (1,696)   (710) (1,437) 10,001  (1,648)
      

    Non-U.S. residential

      858  (74)   (490) 51  345  (58)
      

    Commercial

      2,949  (195)   159  (105) 2,808  (220)
                    
     

    Total trading mortgage-backed securities

     $20,276 $(1,923)$ $(779)$(1,776)$15,798 $(1,785)
                    
     

    U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

                          
      

    U.S. Treasury

     $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 
      

    Agency obligations

      59  (9)   (3) 2  49   
                    
     

    Total U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

     $59 $(9)$ $(3)$2 $49 $ 
                    
     

    State and municipal

     $233 $(22)$ $(80)$(22)$109 $(23)
     

    Foreign government

      1,261  96    (367) (400) 590  82 
     

    Corporate

      13,027  (703)   (792) (2,097) 9,435  221 
     

    Equity securities

      1,387  91    121  267  1,866  222 
     

    Other debt securities

      14,530  11    (1,198) 3,503  16,846  336 
                    

    Total trading securities

     $50,773 $(2,459)$ $(3,098)$(523)$44,693 $(947)
                    

    Derivatives, net(4)

     $3,586 $(2,376)$ $(717)$687 $1,180 $(2,376)
                    

    Investments

                          
     

    Mortgage-backed securities

                          

     

    171


     
      
     Net realized/ unrealized
    gains (losses) included in
      
      
      
      
     
     
      
     Transfers
    in and/or
    out of
    Level 3
     Purchases,
    issuances
    and
    settlements
      
     Unrealized
    gains
    (losses)
    still held(3)
     
    In millions of dollars December 31,
    2008
     Principal
    transactions
     Other(1)(2)  June 30,
    2009
     
      

    U.S. government sponsored

     $ $ $ $75 $3 $78 $ 
      

    Prime

      1,163    161  33  (582) 775  161 
      

    Alt-A

      111    33  63  64  271  22 
      

    Subprime

      25    (9) (10) 11  17   
      

    Commercial

      964    9  (463) 209  719  (4)
                    
     

    Total investment mortgage-backed debt securities

     $2,263 $ $194 $(302)$(295)$1,860 $179 
                    
     

    U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

                          
      

    U.S. Treasury

     $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 
      

    Agency obligations

            9    9   
                    
     

    Total U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

     $ $ $ $9 $ $9 $ 
                    
     

    State and municipal

     $222 $ $ $30 $ $252 $ 
     

    Foreign government

      571      (402) (1) 168   
     

    Corporate

      1,019    44  654  (29) 1,688  35 
     

    Equity securities

      3,807    (480) (130) (379) 2,818  (480)
     

    Other debt securities

      11,324    (427) (948) (1,520) 8,429  (427)
     

    Non-Marketable equity securities

      9,067    (706) (239) (322) 7,800  (779)
                    

    Total investments

     $28,273 $ $(1,375)$(1,328)$(2,546)$23,024 $(1,472)
                    

    Loans

      160    19    17  196  19 

    Mortgage servicing rights

      5,657    1,440    (327) 6,770  1,440 

    Other financial assets measured on a recurring basis

      359    552  756  (22) 1,645  552 
                    

    Liabilities

                          

    Interest-bearing deposits

     $54 $ $(59)$ $(1)$112 $(94)

    Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase

      11,167  308    (3,720) 65  7,204  301 

    Trading account liabilities

                          
     

    Securities sold, not yet purchased

      653  44    (15) 367  961  43 

    Short-term borrowings

      1,329  (65)   (746) (271) 377  (65)

    Long-term debt

      11,198  36    (326) 365  11,201  (50)

    Other financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis

      1    (43)   (25) 19  (43)
                    

    (1)
    Changes in fair value for available-for-sale investments (debt securities) are recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive income, while gains and losses from sales are recorded in Realized gains (losses) from sales of investments on the Consolidated Statement of Income.

    (2)
    Unrealized gains (losses) on MSRs are recorded in Other revenue on the Consolidated Statement of Income.

    (3)
    Represents the amount of total gains or losses for the period, included in earnings (and Accumulated other comprehensive income for changes in fair value for available-for-sale investments), attributable to the change in fair value relating to assets and liabilities classified as Level 3 that are still held at June 30, 2010 and 2009.

    (4)
    Total Level 3 derivative assets and liabilities have been netted in these tables for presentation purposes only.

    172


            The following is a discussion of the changes to the Level 3 balances for each of the roll-forward tables presented above.

    The significant changes from March 31, 2010 to June 30, 2010 in Level 3 assets and liabilities are due to:

      A net increase in Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell of $4.6 billion, which included transfers from Level 2 to Level 3 of $4.2 billion, due to an increase in the expected maturities on these instruments.

      A net decrease in trading securities of $7.4 billion that was mainly driven by:

      A decrease of $4.6 billion in subprime trading mortgage-backed securities, due primarily to the liquidation of super-senior subprime exposures during the second quarter of 2010.

      A decrease of $1.7 billion in corporate trading debt securities, primarily due to paydowns and sales of $1.5 billion.

      The decrease in derivatives of $2.2 billion includes a decrease in credit derivatives of $3 billion. Losses of $1.4 billion on Level 3 credit derivatives during the second quarter relate to the unwind of CDS hedging high grade mezzanine synthetic CDOs, which were terminated during the second quarter, and for which an offsetting gain was recognized upon the release of related CVA. Settlements of $1.2 billion related to the unwind of these contracts.

      The increase in Investments of $3.9 billion included transfers to Level 3 of asset-backed securities of $6.1 billion, related to the transfer of securities from HTM to AFS at June 30, 2010, relating to the adoption of ASU 2010-11.

      The decrease in MSRs of $1.5 billion is due to losses of $1.3 billion during the second quarter, due to a reduction in interest rates.

      The decrease in Long-term debt of $2.1 billion is due primarily to paydowns and maturities during the second quarter of 2010.

    The significant changes from December 31, 2009 to June 30, 2010 in Level 3 assets and liabilities are due to:

      A net increase in Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell of $6.5 billion, due to transfers from Level 2 to Level 3.

      A net decrease in trading securities of $21.4 billion that was mainly driven by:

      A decrease of $7.1 billion in subprime trading mortgage-backed securities, due primarily to the liquidation of super-senior subprime exposures, as discussed above.

      A decrease of $12.2 billion in other debt trading securities, due primarily to the impact of the consolidation of the credit card securitization trusts by the Company upon the adoption of SFAS 166/167 on January 1, 2010. Upon consolidation of the trusts, the Company's investments in the trusts and other intercompany balances are eliminated. At January 1, 2010, the Company's investment in these newly consolidated VIEs included certificates issued by the trusts of $11.1 billion that were classified as Level 3. The impact of the elimination of these certificates has been reflected as net settlements in the Level 3 roll-forward above.

      The increase in Investments of $5.0 billion included transfers to Level 3 of asset-backed securities of $6.1 billion, related to the transfer of securities from HTM to AFS at June 30, 2010.

      The increase in Loans of $3.5 billion is due primarily to the Company's consolidation of certain VIEs upon the adoption of SFAS 166/167 on January 1, 2010, for which the fair value option was elected. The impact from consolidation of these VIEs on Level 3 loans has been reflected as purchases in the roll-forward table above.

      The decrease in Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase of $1.0 billion is due primarily to net transfers to Level 2.

      The increase in Long-term debt of $1.1 billion is due to the impact of the consolidation of certain VIEs upon the adoption of SFAS 166/167 on January 1, 2010, partially offset by paydowns and maturities.

            The significant changes from March 31, 2009 to June 30, 2009 Level 3 assets and liabilities are due to:

      A net increase in trading securities of $1.8 billion that was driven by net realized/unrealized gains of $1.5 billion recorded in Principal transactions, composed mainly of gains on subprime mortgage-backed securities, U.S. government sponsored mortgage-backed securities, corporate debt securities and other debt securities;

      A net decrease in trading derivatives which was driven by net realized/unrealized losses of $2.5 billion recorded in Principal transactions, mainly on complex derivative contracts, such as those linked to credit and equity exposures. These losses are partially offset by gains recognized on instruments that have been classified in Levels 1 and 2.

    The significant changes from December 31, 2008 to June 30, 2009 Level 3 assets and liabilities are due to:

      A net decrease in trading securities of $6.1 billion that was mainly driven by:

      (1)
      Net realized/unrealized losses of $2.4 billion recorded in Principal transactions, mainly composed of write-downs on subprime mortgage-backed securities;

      (2)
      Net transfers of $3.1 billion to Level 2 inventory as a result of better vendor pricing coverage for corporate debt.

      A decrease in investments of $5.3 billion that primarily resulted from:

      Net realized / unrealized losses recorded in other income of $1.4 billion mainly driven by $1.6 billion in losses on hedged senior debt securities retained from the sale of a portfolio of highly leveraged loans;

    173


        as well as losses on private equity investments and real estate fund investments. Offsetting this loss on the retained highly leveraged debt securities is a gain on the corresponding cash flow hedge that is reflected in AOCI and on the line Other financial assets measured on a recurring basis within the fair value hierarchy table presented above as a Level 3 asset.

      Net settlements of investment securities of $2.5 billion mainly due to pay-downs during the quarter.

      Net transfers of $1.4 billion of investments to Level 2.

      A decrease in trading derivatives was driven by net realized and unrealized losses of $2.4 billion recorded in Principal transactions, mainly on complex derivative contracts such as those linked to credit and equity exposures. These losses are partially offset by gains recognized on instruments that have been classified in Levels 1 and 2.

    Transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the Fair Value Hierarchy

            The Company did not have any significant transfers of assets or liabilities between Levels 1 and 2 of the fair value hierarchy during the second quarter of 2010.

    Items Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

            Certain assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis and therefore are not included in the tables above.

            These include assets measured at cost that have been written down to fair value during these periods as a result of an impairment. In addition, these assets include loans held-for-sale (HFS) that are measured at lower of cost or market (LOCOM), that were recognized at fair value below cost at the end of the period.

            The fair value of loans measured on a LOCOM basis is determined where possible using quoted secondary-market prices. Such loans are generally classified as Level 2 of the fair-value hierarchy given the level of activity in the market and the frequency of available quotes. If no such quoted price exists, the fair value of a loan is determined using quoted prices for a similar asset or assets, adjusted for the specific attributes of that loan.

            The following table presents all loans HFS that are carried at LOCOM as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 (in billions):

     
     Aggregate
    cost
     Fair value  Level 2  Level 3  

    June 30, 2010

      $1.5 $1.4 $0.4 $1.0 
              

    December 31, 2009

     $2.5 $1.6 $0.3 $1.3 
              

    174



    17.    FAIR VALUE ELECTIONS

            The Company may elect to report most financial instruments and certain other items at fair value on an instrument-by-instrument basis with changes in fair value reported in earnings. The election is made upon the acquisition of an eligible financial asset, financial liability or firm commitment or when certain specified reconsideration events occur. The fair-value election may not be revoked once an election is made. The changes in fair value are recorded in current earnings. Additional discussion regarding the applicable areas in which fair value elections were made is presented in Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

            All servicing rights must now be recognized initially at fair value. The Company has elected fair-value accounting for its mortgage and student loan classes of servicing rights. See Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussions regarding the accounting and reporting of MSRs.

            The following table presents, as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the fair value of those positions selected for fair-value accounting, as well as the changes in fair value for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009:

     
     Fair value at  Changes in fair value gains
    (losses) for the six months ended
    June 30,
     
    In millions of dollars June 30,
    2010
     December 31,
    2009(1)
     2010  2009(1)  

    Assets

                 

    Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell Selected portfolios of securities purchased under agreements to resell, securities borrowed(2)

      $98,099  $87,837  $528  $(1,256)
              

    Trading account assets

      $13,329  $16,725  $17  $5,278 
              

    Investments

      $437  $574  $(9) $(129)
              

    Loans

                 
     

    Certain corporate loans(3)

      $2,358  $1,405  $(137) $42 
     

    Certain consumer loans(3)

       2,620   34   70   (4)
              

    Total loans

      $4,978  $1,439  $(67) $38 
              

    Other assets

                 
     

    MSRs

      $4,894  $6,530  $(1,198) $1,440 
     

    Certain mortgage loans (HFS)

       3,834   3,338   147   27 
     

    Certain equity method investments

       657   598   (31)  94 
              

    Total other assets

      $9,385  $10,466  $(1,082) $1,561 
              

    Total assets

      $126,228  $117,041  $(613) $5,492 
              

    Liabilities

                 

    Interest-bearing deposits

      $1,387  $1,545  $2  $21 
              

    Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase

                 
     

    Selected portfolios of securities sold under agreements to repurchase, securities loaned(2)

      $119,282  $104,030  $91  $215 
              

    Trading account liabilities

      $4,200  $5,325  $145  $(735)
              

    Short-term borrowings

      $1,650  $639  $57  $22 
              

    Long-term debt

      $25,858  $25,942  $(3) $(40)
              

    Total

      $152,377  $137,481  $292  $(517)
              

    (1)
    Reclassified to conform to current period's presentation.

    (2)
    Reflects netting of the amounts due from securities purchased under agreements to resell and the amounts owed under securities sold under agreements to repurchase.

    (3)
    Includes mortgage loans held by mortgage loan securitization VIEs consolidated upon the adoption of SFAS 166/167 on January 1, 2010.

    175


    Own Credit Valuation Adjustment

            The fair value of debt liabilities for which the fair value option is elected (other than non-recourse and similar liabilities) is impacted by the narrowing or widening of the Company's credit spreads. The estimated change in the fair value of these debt liabilities due to such changes in the Company's own credit risk (or instrument-specific credit risk) was a $455 million gain and a $1.608 billion loss for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and a gain of $450 million and a loss of $1.429 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Changes in fair value resulting from changes in instrument-specific credit risk were estimated by incorporating the Company's current observable credit spreads into the relevant valuation technique used to value each liability as described above.

    The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities

    Selected portfolios of securities purchased under agreements to resell, securities borrowed, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, securities loaned and certain non-collateralized short-term borrowings

            The Company elected the fair value option for certain portfolios of fixed-income securities purchased under agreements to resell and fixed-income securities sold under agreements to repurchase (and certain non-collateralized short-term borrowings) on broker-dealer entities in the United States, United Kingdom and Japan. In each case, the election was made because the related interest-rate risk is managed on a portfolio basis, primarily with derivative instruments that are accounted for at fair value through earnings.

            Changes in fair value for transactions in these portfolios are recorded in Principal transactions. The related interest revenue and interest expense are measured based on the contractual rates specified in the transactions and are reported as interest revenue and expense in the Consolidated Statement of Income.

    Selected letters of credit and revolving loans hedged by credit default swaps or participation notes

            The Company has elected the fair value option for certain letters of credit that are hedged with derivative instruments or participation notes. Citigroup elected the fair value option for these transactions because the risk is managed on a fair value basis and mitigates accounting mismatches.

            The notional amount of these unfunded letters of credit was $1.8 billion as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009. The amount funded was insignificant with no amounts 90 days or more past due or on non-accrual status at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.

            These items have been classified in Trading account assets or Trading account liabilitieson the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Changes in fair value of these items are classified in Principal transactions in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income.

    Certain loans and other credit products

            Citigroup has elected the fair value option for certain originated and purchased loans, including certain unfunded loan products, such as guarantees and letters of credit, executed by Citigroup's trading businesses. None of these credit products is a highly leveraged financing commitment. Significant groups of transactions include loans and unfunded loan products that are expected to be either sold or securitized in the near term, or transactions where the economic risks are hedged with derivative instruments such as purchased credit default swaps or total return swaps where the Company pays the total return on the underlying loans to a third party. Citigroup has elected the fair value option to mitigate accounting mismatches in cases where hedge accounting is complex and to achieve operational simplifications. Fair value was not elected for most lending transactions across the Company, including where management objectives would not be met.

    176


            The following table provides information about certain credit products carried at fair value at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:

     
     June 30, 2010  December 31, 2009  
    In millions of dollars Trading
    assets
     Loans  Trading
    assets
     Loans  

    Carrying amount reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheet

      $13,299  $1,258  $14,338  $945 

    Aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value

       697   (62)  390   (44)

    Balance of non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due

       220     312   

    Aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due

       270     267   
              

            In addition to the amounts reported above, $416 million and $200 million of unfunded loan commitments related to certain credit products selected for fair value accounting was outstanding as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.

            Changes in fair value of funded and unfunded credit products are classified in Principal transactions in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income. Related interest revenue is measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as Interest revenue on Trading account assets or loan interest depending on the balance sheet classifications of the credit products. The changes in fair value for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 due to instrument-specific credit risk totaled to a gain of $27 million and a loss of $48 million, respectively.

    Certain investments in private equity and real estate ventures and certain equity method investments

            Citigroup invests in private equity and real estate ventures for the purpose of earning investment returns and for capital appreciation. The Company has elected the fair value option for certain of these ventures, because such investments are considered similar to many private equity or hedge fund activities in Citi's investment companies, which are reported at fair value. The fair value option brings consistency in the accounting and evaluation of certain of these investments. All investments (debt and equity) in such private equity and real estate entities are accounted for at fair value. These investments are classified as Investments on Citigroup's Consolidated Balance Sheet.

            Citigroup also holds various non-strategic investments in leveraged buyout funds and other hedge funds for which the Company elected fair value accounting to reduce operational and accounting complexity. Since the funds account for all of their underlying assets at fair value, the impact of applying the equity method to Citigroup's investment in these funds was equivalent to fair value accounting. These investments are classified as Other assets on Citigroup's Consolidated Balance Sheet.

            Changes in the fair values of these investments are classified in Other revenue in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income.

    Certain mortgage loans (HFS)

            Citigroup has elected the fair value option for certain purchased and originated prime fixed-rate and conforming adjustable-rate first mortgage loans HFS. These loans are intended for sale or securitization and are hedged with derivative instruments. The Company has elected the fair value option to mitigate accounting mismatches in cases where hedge accounting is complex and to achieve operational simplifications.

    177


            The following table provides information about certain mortgage loans HFS carried at fair value at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:

    In millions of dollars June 30, 2010  December 31, 2009  

    Carrying amount reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheet

      $3,834  $3,338 

    Aggregate fair value in excess of unpaid principal balance

       172   55 

    Balance of non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due

       2   4 

    Aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due

         3 
          

            The changes in fair values of these mortgage loans are reported in Other revenue in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income. The changes in fair value during the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 due to instrument-specific credit risk resulted in a $3 million loss and $10 million loss, respectively. Related interest income continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the Consolidated Statement of Income.

    Certain Consolidated VIEs

            The Company has elected the fair value option for all qualified assets and liabilities of certain VIEs that were consolidated upon the adoption of SFAS 166/167 on January 1, 2010, including certain private label mortgage securitizations, mutual fund deferred sales commissions and collateralized loan obligation VIEs. The Company elected the fair value option for these VIEs as the Company believes this method better reflects the economic risks, since substantially all of the Company's retained interests in these entities are carried at fair value.

            With respect to the consolidated mortgage VIEs, the Company determined the fair value for the mortgage loans and long-term debt utilizing internal valuation techniques. The fair value of the long-term debt measured using internal valuation techniques is verified, where possible, to prices obtained from independent vendors. Vendors compile prices from various sources and may apply matrix pricing for similar securities when no price is observable. Security pricing associated with long-term debt that is verified is classified as Level 2 and non-verified debt is classified as Level 3. The fair value of mortgage loans of each VIE is derived from the security pricing. When substantially all of the long-term debt of a VIE is valued using Level 2 inputs, the corresponding mortgage loans are classified as Level 2. Otherwise, the mortgage loans of a VIE are classified as Level 3.

            With respect to the consolidated mortgage VIEs for which the fair value option was elected, the mortgage loans are classified as Loans on Citigroup's Consolidated Balance Sheet. The changes in fair value of the loans are reported as Other revenue in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income. Related interest revenue is measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as Interest revenue in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income. Information about these mortgage loans is included in the table below. The change in fair value of these loans due to instrument-specific credit risk was a loss of $180 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010.

            The debt issued by these consolidated VIEs is classified as long-term debt on Citigroup's Consolidated Balance Sheet. The changes in fair value for the majority of these liabilities are reported in Other revenue in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income. Related interest expense is measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the Consolidated Statement of Income. The aggregate unpaid principal balance of long-term debt of these consolidated VIEs exceeded the aggregate fair value by $1.6 billion as of June 30, 2010.

            The following table provides information about corporate and consumer loans of consolidated VIEs carried at fair value:

     
     June 30, 2010  
    In millions of dollars Corporate
    Loans
     Consumer
    Loans
     

    Carrying amount reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheet

      $680  $2,590 

    Aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value

       495   973 

    Balance of non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due

       95   269 

    Aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due

       148   261 
          

    Mortgage servicing rights

            The Company accounts for mortgage servicing rights (MSRs) at fair value. Fair value for MSRs is determined using an option-adjusted spread valuation approach. This approach consists of projecting servicing cash flows under multiple interest-rate scenarios and discounting these cash flows using risk-adjusted rates. The model assumptions used in the valuation of MSRs include mortgage prepayment speeds and discount rates. The fair value of MSRs is primarily affected by changes in prepayments that result from shifts in mortgage interest rates. In managing this risk, the Company hedges a significant portion of the values of its MSRs through the use of interest-rate derivative contracts, forward-purchase commitments of mortgage-backed securities, and purchased securities classified as trading. See Note14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussions regarding the accounting and reporting of MSRs.

            These MSRs, which totaled $4.894 billion and $6.530 billion as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, are classified as Mortgage servicing rights on Citigroup's Consolidated Balance Sheet. Changes in fair value of MSRs are recorded in Other revenue in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income.

    178


    Certain structured liabilities

            The Company has elected the fair value option for certain structured liabilities whose performance is linked to structured interest rates, inflation, currency, equity, referenced credit or commodity risks (structured liabilities). The Company elected the fair value option, because these exposures are considered to be trading-related positions and, therefore, are managed on a fair value basis. These positions will continue to be classified as debt, deposits or derivatives (Trading account liabilities) on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet according to their legal form.

            The change in fair value for these structured liabilities is reported in Principal transactions in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income. Changes in fair value for structured debt with embedded equity, referenced credit or commodity underlyings includes an economic component for accrued interest. For structured debt that contains embedded interest rate, inflation or currency risks, related interest expense is measured based on the contracted interest rates and reported as such in the Consolidated Statement of Income.

    Certain non-structured liabilities

            The Company has elected the fair value option for certain non-structured liabilities with fixed and floating interest rates (non-structured liabilities). The Company has elected the fair value option where the interest-rate risk of such liabilities is economically hedged with derivative contracts or the proceeds are used to purchase financial assets that will also be accounted for at fair value through earnings. The election has been made to mitigate accounting mismatches and to achieve operational simplifications. These positions are reported in Short-term borrowings and Long-term debt on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet. The change in fair value for these non-structured liabilities is reported in Principal transactions in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income.

            Related interest expense continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the Consolidated Statement of Income.

            The following table provides information about long-term debt, excluding the debt issued by the consolidated VIEs, carried at fair value at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:

    In millions of dollars June 30, 2010  December 31, 2009  

    Carrying amount reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheet

      $20,440  $25,942 

    Aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value

       2,815   3,399 

            The following table provides information about short-term borrowings carried at fair value:

    In millions of dollars June 30, 2010  December 31, 2009  

    Carrying amount reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheet

      $1,650  $639 

    Aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value

       155   53 

    179


    18.   FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

    Estimated Fair Value of Financial Instruments

            The table below presents the carrying value and fair value of Citigroup's financial instruments. The disclosure excludes leases, affiliate investments, pension and benefit obligations and insurance policy claim reserves. In addition, contract-holder fund amounts exclude certain insurance contracts. Also as required, the disclosure excludes the effect of taxes, any premium or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time the entire holdings of a particular instrument, excess fair value associated with deposits with no fixed maturity and other expenses that would be incurred in a market transaction. In addition, the table excludes the values of non-financial assets and liabilities, as well as a wide range of franchise, relationship and intangible values (but includes mortgage servicing rights), which are integral to a full assessment of Citigroup's financial position and the value of its net assets.

            The fair value represents management's best estimates based on a range of methodologies and assumptions. The carrying value of short-term financial instruments not accounted for at fair value, as well as receivables and payables arising in the ordinary course of business, approximates fair value because of the relatively short period of time between their origination and expected realization. Quoted market prices are used when available for investments and for both trading and end-user derivatives, as well as for liabilities, such as long-term debt, with quoted prices. For performing loans not accounted for at fair value, contractual cash flows are discounted at quoted secondary market rates or estimated market rates if available. Otherwise, sales of comparable loan portfolios or current market origination rates for loans with similar terms and risk characteristics are used. For loans with doubt as to collectability, expected cash flows are discounted using an appropriate rate considering the time of collection and the premium for the uncertainty of the cash flows. The value of collateral is also considered. For liabilities such as long-term debt not accounted for at fair value and without quoted market prices, market borrowing rates of interest are used to discount contractual cash flows.

     
     June 30, 2010  December 31, 2009  
    In billions of dollars Carrying
    value
     Estimated
    fair value
     Carrying
    value
     Estimated
    fair value
     

    Assets

                 

    Investments

      $317.1  $317.6  $306.1  $307.6 

    Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell

       230.8   230.8   222.0   222.0 

    Trading account assets

       309.4   309.4   342.8   342.8 

    Loans(1)

       643.5   632.5   552.5   542.8 

    Other financial assets(2)

       286.6   286.6   290.9   290.9 
              

     

     
     June 30, 2010  December 31, 2009  
    In billions of dollars Carrying
    value
     Estimated
    fair value
     Carrying
    value
     Estimated
    fair value
     

    Liabilities

                 

    Deposits

      $814.0  $812.2  $835.9  $834.5 

    Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase

       196.1   196.1   154.3   154.3 

    Trading account liabilities

       131.0   131.0   137.5   137.5 

    Long-term debt

       413.3   408.8   364.0   354.8 

    Other financial liabilities(3)

       192.6   192.6   175.8   175.8 
              

    (1)
    The carrying value of loans is net of the Allowance for loan losses of $46.2 billion and $36.0 billion for June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. In addition, the carrying values exclude $2.5 billion and $2.9 billion of lease finance receivables at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.

    (2)
    Includes cash and due from banks, deposits with banks, brokerage receivables, reinsurance recoverable, MSRs, separate and variable accounts and other financial instruments included in Other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, for all of which the carrying value is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

    (3)
    Includes brokerage payables, separate and variable accounts, short-term borrowings and other financial instruments included in Other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, for all of which the carrying value is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

            Fair values vary from period to period based on changes in a wide range of factors, including interest rates, credit quality, and market perceptions of value and as existing assets and liabilities run off and new transactions are entered into.

            The estimated fair values of loans reflect changes in credit status since the loans were made, changes in interest rates in the case of fixed-rate loans, and premium values at origination of certain loans. The carrying values (reduced by the Allowance for loan losses) exceeded the estimated fair values of Citigroup's loans, in aggregate, by $11.0 billion and $9.7 billion at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. At June 30, 2010, the carrying values, net of allowances, exceeded the estimated values by $9.1 billion and $1.9 billion for consumer loans and corporate loans, respectively.

            The estimated fair values of the Company's corporate unfunded lending commitments at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 were $5.4 billion and $5.0 billion, respectively. The Company does not estimate the fair values of consumer unfunded lending commitments, which are generally cancellable by providing notice to the borrower.

    180


    19.   GUARANTEES

            The Company provides a variety of guarantees and indemnifications to Citigroup customers to enhance their credit standing and enable them to complete a wide variety of business transactions. For certain contracts meeting the definition of a guarantee, the guarantor must recognize, at inception, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee.

            In addition, the guarantor must disclose the maximum potential amount of future payments the guarantor could be required to make under the guarantee, if there were a total default by the guaranteed parties. The determination of the maximum potential future payments is based on the notional amount of the guarantees without consideration of possible recoveries under recourse provisions or from collateral held or pledged. Such amounts bear no relationship to the anticipated losses, if any, on these guarantees.

            The following tables present information about the Company's guarantees at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:

     
     Maximum potential amount of future payments  
    In billions of dollars at June 30,
    except carrying value in millions
     Expire within
    1 year
     Expire after
    1 year
     Total amount
    outstanding
     Carrying value
    (in millions)
     

    2010

                 

    Financial standby letters of credit

      $35.8  $49.0  $84.8  $280.6 

    Performance guarantees

       8.6   4.3   12.9   27.5 

    Derivative instruments considered to be guarantees

       3.0   4.3   7.3   954.9 

    Loans sold with recourse

         0.3   0.3   75.0 

    Securities lending indemnifications(1)

       68.9     68.9   

    Credit card merchant processing(1)

       61.1     61.1   

    Custody indemnifications and other

         35.2   35.2   275.7 
              

    Total

      $177.4  $93.1  $270.5  $1,613.7 
              

    (1)
    The carrying values of guarantees of collections of contractual cash flows, securities lending indemnifications and credit card merchant processing are not material, as the Company has determined that the amount and probability of potential liabilities arising from these guarantees are not significant.

     
     Maximum potential amount of future payments  
    In billions of dollars at December 31,
    except carrying value in millions
     Expire within
    1 year
     Expire after
    1 year
     Total amount
    outstanding
     Carrying value
    (in millions)
     

    2009

                 

    Financial standby letters of credit

     $41.4 $48.0 $89.4 $438.8 

    Performance guarantees

      9.4  4.5  13.9  32.4 

    Derivative instruments considered to be guarantees

      4.1  3.6  7.7  569.2 

    Loans sold with recourse

        0.3  0.3  76.6 

    Securities lending indemnifications(1)

      64.5    64.5   

    Credit card merchant processing(1)

      59.7    59.7   

    Custody indemnifications and other

        33.5  33.5  121.4 
              

    Total

     $179.1 $89.9 $269.0 $1,238.4 
              

    (1)
    The carrying values of guarantees of collections of contractual cash flows, securities lending indemnifications and credit card merchant processing are not material, as the Company has determined that the amount and probability of potential liabilities arising from these guarantees are not significant.

    181


    Financial standby letters of credit

            Citigroup issues standby letters of credit which substitute its own credit for that of the borrower. If a letter of credit is drawn down, the borrower is obligated to repay Citigroup. Standby letters of credit protect a third party from defaults on contractual obligations. Financial standby letters of credit include guarantees of payment of insurance premiums and reinsurance risks that support industrial revenue bond underwriting and settlement of payment obligations to clearing houses, and also support options and purchases of securities or are in lieu of escrow deposit accounts. Financial standbys also backstop loans, credit facilities, promissory notes and trade acceptances.

    Performance guarantees

            Performance guarantees and letters of credit are issued to guarantee a customer's tender bid on a construction or systems-installation project or to guarantee completion of such projects in accordance with contract terms. They are also issued to support a customer's obligation to supply specified products, commodities, or maintenance or warranty services to a third party.

    Derivative instruments considered to be guarantees

            Derivatives are financial instruments whose cash flows are based on a notional amount or an underlying instrument, where there is little or no initial investment, and whose terms require or permit net settlement. Derivatives may be used for a variety of reasons, including risk management, or to enhance returns. Financial institutions often act as intermediaries for their clients, helping clients reduce their risks. However, derivatives may also be used to take a risk position.

            The derivative instruments considered to be guarantees, which are presented in the tables above, include only those instruments that require Citi to make payments to the counterparty based on changes in an underlying that is related to an asset, a liability, or an equity security held by the guaranteed party. More specifically, derivative instruments considered to be guarantees include certain over-the-counter written put options where the counterparty is not a bank, hedge fund or broker-dealer (such counterparties are considered to be dealers in these markets and may therefore not hold the underlying instruments). However, credit derivatives sold by the Company are excluded from this presentation, as they are disclosed separately in Note 15. In addition, non-credit derivative contracts that are cash settled and for which the Company is unable to assert that it is probable the counterparty held the underlying instrument at the inception of the contract also are excluded from the disclosure above.

            In instances where the Company's maximum potential future payment is unlimited, the notional amount of the contract is disclosed.

    Loans sold with recourse

            Loans sold with recourse represent the Company's obligations to reimburse the buyers for loan losses under certain circumstances. Recourse refers to the clause in a sales agreement under which a lender will fully reimburse the buyer/investor for any losses resulting from the purchased loans. This may be accomplished by the seller's taking back any loans that become delinquent.

    Securities lending indemnifications

            Owners of securities frequently lend those securities for a fee to other parties who may sell them short or deliver them to another party to satisfy some other obligation. Banks may administer such securities lending programs for their clients. Securities lending indemnifications are issued by the bank to guarantee that a securities lending customer will be made whole in the event that the security borrower does not return the security subject to the lending agreement and collateral held is insufficient to cover the market value of the security.

    Credit card merchant processing

            Credit card merchant processing guarantees represent the Company's indirect obligations in connection with the processing of private label and bankcard transactions on behalf of merchants.

            Citigroup's primary credit card business is the issuance of credit cards to individuals. In addition, the Company provides transaction processing services to various merchants with respect to bankcard and private-label cards. In the event of a billing dispute with respect to a bankcard transaction between a merchant and a cardholder that is ultimately resolved in the cardholder's favor, the third party holds the primary contingent liability to credit or refund the amount to the cardholder and charge back the transaction to the merchant. If the third party is unable to collect this amount from the merchant, it bears the loss for the amount of the credit or refund paid to the cardholder.

            The Company continues to have the primary contingent liability with respect to its portfolio of private-label merchants. The risk of loss is mitigated as the cash flows between the third party or the Company and the merchant are settled on a net basis and the third party or the Company has the right to offset any payments with cash flows otherwise due to the merchant. To further mitigate this risk, the third party or the Company may require a merchant to make an escrow deposit, delay settlement, or include event triggers to provide the third party or the Company with more financial and operational control in the event of the financial deterioration of the merchant, or require various credit enhancements (including letters of credit and bank guarantees). In the unlikely event that a private-label merchant is unable to deliver products, services or a refund to its private-label cardholders, Citigroup is contingently liable to credit or refund cardholders. In addition, although a third party holds the primary contingent liability with respect to the processing of bankcard transactions, in the event that the third party does not have sufficient collateral from the merchant or sufficient financial resources of its own to provide the credit or refunds to the cardholders, Citigroup would be liable to credit or refund the cardholders.

            The Company's maximum potential contingent liability related to both bankcard and private-label merchant processing services is estimated to be the total volume of credit card transactions that meet the requirements to be valid chargeback transactions at any given time. At June 30, 2010 and

    182


    December 31, 2009, this maximum potential exposure was estimated to be $61 billion and $60 billion, respectively.

            However, the Company believes that the maximum exposure is not representative of the actual potential loss exposure based on the Company's historical experience and its position as a secondary guarantor (in the case of bankcards). In most cases, this contingent liability is unlikely to arise, as most products and services are delivered when purchased, and amounts are refunded when items are returned to merchants. The Company assesses the probability and amount of its contingent liability related to merchant processing based on the financial strength of the primary guarantor (in the case of bankcards) and the extent and nature of unresolved chargebacks and its historical loss experience. At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the estimated losses incurred and the carrying amounts of the Company's contingent obligations related to merchant processing activities were immaterial.

    Custody indemnifications

            Custody indemnifications are issued to guarantee that custody clients will be made whole in the event that a third-party subcustodian or depository institution fails to safeguard clients' assets.

    Other

            Citigroup has an accrual related to certain of Visa USA's litigation matters. As of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the carrying value of the accrual was $276 million and $121 million, respectively, and the amount is included in Other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

    Other guarantees and indemnifications

            The Company, through its credit card business, provides various cardholder protection programs on several of its card products, including programs that provide insurance coverage for rental cars, coverage for certain losses associated with purchased products, price protection for certain purchases and protection for lost luggage. These guarantees are not included in the table, since the total outstanding amount of the guarantees and the Company's maximum exposure to loss cannot be quantified. The protection is limited to certain types of purchases and certain types of losses and it is not possible to quantify the purchases that would qualify for these benefits at any given time. The Company assesses the probability and amount of its potential liability related to these programs based on the extent and nature of its historical loss experience. At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the actual and estimated losses incurred and the carrying value of the Company's obligations related to these programs were immaterial.

            In the normal course of business, the Company provides standard representations and warranties to counterparties in contracts in connection with numerous transactions and also provides indemnifications that protect the counterparties to the contracts in the event that additional taxes are owed due either to a change in the tax law or an adverse interpretation of the tax law. Counterparties to these transactions provide the Company with comparable indemnifications. While such representations, warranties and tax indemnifications are essential components of many contractual relationships, they do not represent the underlying business purpose for the transactions. The indemnification clauses are often standard contractual terms related to the Company's own performance under the terms of a contract and are entered into in the normal course of business based on an assessment that the risk of loss is remote. Often these clauses are intended to ensure that terms of a contract are met at inception (for example, that loans transferred to a counterparty in a sales transaction did in fact meet the conditions specified in the contract at the transfer date). No compensation is received for these standard representations and warranties, and it is not possible to determine their fair value because they rarely, if ever, result in a payment. In many cases, there are no stated or notional amounts included in the indemnification clauses and the contingencies potentially triggering the obligation to indemnify have not occurred and are not expected to occur. These indemnifications are not included in the table above.

            In addition, the Company is a member of or shareholder in hundreds of value-transfer networks (VTNs) (payment clearing and settlement systems as well as securities exchanges) around the world. As a condition of membership, many of these VTNs require that members stand ready to backstop the net effect on the VTNs of a member's default on its obligations. The Company's potential obligations as a shareholder or member of VTN associations are excluded from the scope of FIN 45, since the shareholders and members represent subordinated classes of investors in the VTNs. Accordingly, the Company's participation in VTNs is not reported in the table and there are no amounts reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2010 or December 31, 2009 for potential obligations that could arise from the Company's involvement with VTN associations.

            In the sale of an insurance subsidiary, the Company provided an indemnification to an insurance company for policyholder claims and other liabilities relating to a book of long-term care (LTC) business (for the entire term of the LTC policies) that is fully reinsured by another insurance company. The reinsurer has funded two trusts with securities whose fair value (approximately $3.8 billion and $3.3 billion at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively) is designed to cover the insurance company's statutory liabilities for the LTC policies. The assets in these trusts are evaluated and adjusted periodically to ensure that the fair value of the assets continues to cover the estimated statutory liabilities related to the LTC policies, as those statutory liabilities change over time. If the reinsurer fails to perform under the reinsurance agreement for any reason, including insolvency, and the assets in the two trusts are insufficient or unavailable to the ceding insurance company, then Citigroup must indemnify the ceding insurance company for any losses actually incurred in connection with the LTC policies. Since both events would have to occur before Citi would become responsible for any payment to the ceding insurance company pursuant to its indemnification obligation and the likelihood of such events occurring is currently not probable, there is no liability reflected in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 related to this indemnification.

    183


            At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the total carrying amounts of the liabilities related to the guarantees and indemnifications included in the table amounted to approximately $1.6 billion and $1.2 billion, respectively. The carrying value of derivative instruments is included in either Trading account liabilities or Other liabilities, depending upon whether the derivative was entered into for trading or non-trading purposes. The carrying value of financial and performance guarantees is included in Other liabilities. For loans sold with recourse, the carrying value of the liability is included in Other liabilities. In addition, at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, Other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet include an allowance for credit losses of $1.054 billion and $1.122 billion relating to letters of credit and unfunded lending commitments, respectively.

    Collateral

            Cash collateral available to the Company to reimburse losses realized under these guarantees and indemnifications amounted to $33 billion and $31 billion at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. Securities and other marketable assets held as collateral amounted to $45 billion and $43 billion, respectively, the majority of which collateral is held to reimburse losses realized under securities lending indemnifications. Additionally, letters of credit in favor of the Company held as collateral amounted to $1.6 billion at June 30, 2010 and $1.4 billion at December 31, 2009. Other property may also be available to the Company to cover losses under certain guarantees and indemnifications; however, the value of such property has not been determined.

    Performance risk

            Citigroup evaluates the performance risk of its guarantees based on the assigned referenced counterparty internal or external ratings. Where external ratings are used, investment-grade ratings are considered to be Baa/BBB and above, while anything below is considered non-investment grade. The Citigroup internal ratings are in line with the related external rating system. On certain underlying referenced credits or entities, ratings are not available. Such referenced credits are included in the not rated category. The maximum potential amount of the future payments related to guarantees and credit derivatives sold is determined to be the notional amount of these contracts, which is the par amount of the assets guaranteed.

            Presented in the tables below are the maximum potential amounts of future payments classified based upon internal and external credit ratings as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009. As previously mentioned, the determination of the maximum potential future payments is based on the notional amount of the guarantees without consideration of possible recoveries under recourse provisions or from collateral held or pledged. Such amounts bear no relationship to the anticipated losses, if any, on these guarantees.

     
     Maximum potential amount of future payments  
    In billions of dollars as of June 30, 2010 Investment
    grade
     Non-investment
    grade
     Not rated  Total  

    Financial standby letters of credit

      $47.7  $14.3  $22.8  $84.8 

    Performance guarantees

       6.4   3.6   2.9   12.9 

    Derivative instruments deemed to be guarantees

           7.3   7.3 

    Loans sold with recourse

           0.3   0.3 

    Securities lending indemnifications

           68.9   68.9 

    Credit card merchant processing

           61.1   61.1 

    Custody indemnifications and other

       29.2   6.0     35.2 
              

    Total

      $83.3  $23.9  $163.3  $270.5 
              

     

     
     Maximum potential amount of future payments  
    In billions of dollars as of December 31, 2009 Investment
    grade
     Non-investment
    grade
     Not rated  Total  

    Financial standby letters of credit

     $49.2 $13.5 $26.7 $89.4 

    Performance guarantees

      6.5  3.7  3.7  13.9 

    Derivative instruments deemed to be guarantees

          7.7  7.7 

    Loans sold with recourse

          0.3  0.3 

    Securities lending indemnifications

          64.5  64.5 

    Credit card merchant processing

          59.7  59.7 

    Custody indemnifications and other

      27.7  5.8    33.5 
              

    Total

     $83.4 $23.0 $162.6 $269.0 
              

    184


    Credit Commitments and Lines of Credit

            The table below summarizes Citigroup's credit commitments as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:

    In millions of dollars U.S.  Outside of
    U.S.
     June 30,
    2010
     December 31,
    2009
     

    Commercial and similar letters of credit

      $1,484  $6,930  $8,414  $7,211 

    One- to four-family residential mortgages

       1,026   315   1,341   1,070 

    Revolving open-end loans secured by one- to four-family residential properties

       19,240   2,717   21,957   23,916 

    Commercial real estate, construction and land development

       1,872   316   2,188   1,704 

    Credit card lines

       596,701   123,501   720,202   785,495 

    Commercial and other consumer loan commitments

       118,533   79,290   197,823   257,342 
              

    Total

      $738,856  $213,069  $951,925  $1,076,738 
              

            The majority of unused commitments are contingent upon customers' maintaining specific credit standards. Commercial commitments generally have floating interest rates and fixed expiration dates and may require payment of fees. Such fees (net of certain direct costs) are deferred and, upon exercise of the commitment, amortized over the life of the loan or, if exercise is deemed remote, amortized over the commitment period.

    Commercial and similar letters of credit

            A commercial letter of credit is an instrument by which Citigroup substitutes its credit for that of a customer to enable the customer to finance the purchase of goods or to incur other commitments. Citigroup issues a letter on behalf of its client to a supplier and agrees to pay the supplier upon presentation of documentary evidence that the supplier has performed in accordance with the terms of the letter of credit. When a letter of credit is drawn, the customer is then required to reimburse Citigroup.

    One- to four-family residential mortgages

            A one- to four-family residential mortgage commitment is a written confirmation from Citigroup to a seller of a property that the bank will advance the specified sums enabling the buyer to complete the purchase.

    Revolving open-end loans secured by one- to four-family residential properties

            Revolving open-end loans secured by one- to four-family residential properties are essentially home equity lines of credit. A home equity line of credit is a loan secured by a primary residence or second home to the extent of the excess of fair market value over the debt outstanding for the first mortgage.

    Commercial real estate, construction and land development

            Commercial real estate, construction and land development include unused portions of commitments to extend credit for the purpose of financing commercial and multifamily residential properties as well as land development projects. Both secured-by-real-estate and unsecured commitments are included in this line, as well as undistributed loan proceeds, where there is an obligation to advance for construction progress payments. However, this line only includes those extensions of credit that, once funded, will be classified as Total loans, net on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

    Credit card lines

            Citigroup provides credit to customers by issuing credit cards. The credit card lines are unconditionally cancellable by the issuer.

    Commercial and other consumer loan commitments

            Commercial and other consumer loan commitments include overdraft and liquidity facilities, as well as commercial commitments to make or purchase loans, to purchase third-party receivables, to provide note issuance or revolving underwriting facilities and to invest in the form of equity. Amounts include $79 billion and $126 billion with an original maturity of less than one year at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.

            In addition, included in this line item are highly leveraged financing commitments, which are agreements that provide funding to a borrower with higher levels of debt (measured by the ratio of debt capital to equity capital of the borrower) than is generally considered normal for other companies. This type of financing is commonly employed in corporate acquisitions, management buy-outs and similar transactions.

    185


    20.   CONTINGENCIES

            In accordance with ASC 450 (formerly SFAS 5), Citigroup establishes accruals for litigation and regulatory matters when it is probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Once established, accruals are adjusted from time to time, as appropriate, in light of additional information. In view of the inherent unpredictability of litigation and regulatory matters, particularly where the damages sought are substantial or indeterminate, the investigations or proceedings are in the early stages, or the matters involve novel legal theories or a large number of parties, Citigroup cannot at this time estimate the possible loss or range of loss, if any, in excess of the amounts accrued for these matters or predict the timing of their eventual resolution, and the actual costs of resolving litigation and regulatory matters may be substantially higher or lower than the amounts accrued for those matters.

            Subject to the foregoing, it is the opinion of Citigroup's management, based on current knowledge and after taking into account available insurance coverage and its current accruals, that the eventual outcome of these matters would not be likely to have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial condition of Citi. Nonetheless, given the inherent unpredictability of litigation and the substantial or indeterminate amounts sought in certain of these matters, an adverse outcome in certain of these matters could, from time to time, have a material adverse effect on Citi's consolidated results of operations or cash flows in particular quarterly or annual periods.

    186


    Table of Contents


    21.    CITIBANK, N.A. STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY

    Statement of Changes in Stockholder's Equity

     
     Citibank, N.A. and Subsidiaries 
     
     Six Months Ended June 30,  
    In millions of dollars, except shares 2010  2009  

    Common stock ($20 par value)

           

    Balance, beginning of period—shares: 37,534,553 in 2010 and 2009

      $751  $751 
          

    Balance, end of period

      $751  $751 
          

    Surplus

           

    Balance, beginning of period

      $107,923  $74,767 

    Capital contribution from parent company

       810   27,481 

    Employee benefit plans

       366   15 
          

    Balance, end of period

      $109,099  $102,263 
          

    Retained earnings

           

    Balance, beginning of period

      $19,457  $21,735 

    Adjustment to opening balance, net of taxes(1)(2)

       (411)  402 
          

    Adjusted balance, beginning of period

      $19,046  $22,137 

    Net income

       4,920   (1,477)

    Dividends(3)

       9   3 

    Other(4)

         117 
          

    Balance, end of period

      $23,975  $20,780 
          

    Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

           

    Balance, beginning of period

      $(11,532) $(15,895)

    Adjustment to opening balance, net of taxes(1)

         (402)
          

    Adjusted balance, beginning of period

      $(11,532) $(16,297)

    Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities available-for-sale, net of taxes

       1,787   1,731 

    Net change in foreign currency translation adjustment, net of taxes

       (2,708)  (164)

    Net change in cash flow hedges, net of taxes

       226   737 

    Pension liability adjustment, net of taxes

         29 
          

    Net change in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

      $(695) $2,333 
          

    Balance, end of period

      $(12,227) $(13,964)
          

    Total Citibank stockholder's equity

      $121,598  $109,830 
          

    Noncontrolling interest

           

    Balance, beginning of period

      $1,294  $1,082 

    Initial origination of a noncontrolling interest

       (75)  

    Transactions between noncontrolling interest and the related consolidating subsidiary

       (1)  

    Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest shareholders

       48   23 

    Dividends paid to noncontrolling interest shareholders

       (1)  (16)

    Accumulated other comprehensive income—Net change in unrealized gains and losses on investment securities, net of tax

       6   1 

    Accumulated other comprehensive income—Net change in FX translation adjustment, net of tax

       (105)  (40)

    All other

       (42)  (153)
          

    Net change in noncontrolling interest

      $(170) $(185)
          

    Balance, end of period

      $1,124  $897 
          

    Total equity

      $122,722  $110,727 
          

    Comprehensive income (loss)

           

    Net income (loss) before attribution of noncontrolling interest

      $4,968  $(1,454)

    Net change in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

       (794)  2,294 
          

    Total comprehensive income (loss)

      $4,174  $840 

    Comprehensive income attributable to the noncontrolling interest

       (51)  (16)
          

    Comprehensive income attributable to Citibank

      $4,225  $856 
          

    (1)
    The adjustment to the opening balances for Retained earnings and Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in 2009 represents the cumulative effect of initially adopting ASC 320-10-35-34 (FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2).

    (2)
    The adjustment to the opening balance for Retained earnings in 2010 represents the cumulative effect of initially adopting ASC 810, Consolidation (formerly FASB Interpretation No. 46(R), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities). See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

    (3)
    Includes common dividends related to forfeitures of previously issued but unvested employee stock awards.

    (4)
    Represents the accounting for the transfers of assets and liabilities between Citibank, N.A. and other affiliates under the common control of Citigroup.

    187


    Table of Contents


    22.    SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

            The Company has evaluated subsequent events through August 6, 2010, which is the date its Consolidated Financial Statements were issued.


    23.    CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SCHEDULES

            These condensed Consolidating Financial Statements schedules are presented for purposes of additional analysis but should be considered in relation to the Consolidated Financial Statements of Citigroup taken as a whole.

    Citigroup Parent Company

            The holding company, Citigroup Inc.

    Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc. (CGMHI)

            Citigroup guarantees various debt obligations of CGMHI as well as all of the outstanding debt obligations under CGMHI's publicly issued debt.

    Citigroup Funding Inc. (CFI)

            CFI is a first-tier subsidiary of Citigroup, which issues commercial paper, medium-term notes and structured equity-linked and credit-linked notes, all of which are guaranteed by Citigroup.

    CitiFinancial Credit Company (CCC)

            An indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Citigroup. CCC is a wholly owned subsidiary of Associates. Citigroup has issued a full and unconditional guarantee of the outstanding indebtedness of CCC.

    Associates First Capital Corporation (Associates)

            A wholly owned subsidiary of Citigroup. Citigroup has issued a full and unconditional guarantee of the outstanding long-term debt securities and commercial paper of Associates. In addition, Citigroup guaranteed various debt obligations of Citigroup Finance Canada Inc. (CFCI), a wholly owned subsidiary of Associates. CFCI continues to issue debt in the Canadian market supported by a Citigroup guarantee. Associates is the immediate parent company of CCC.

    Other Citigroup Subsidiaries

            Includes all other subsidiaries of Citigroup, intercompany eliminations, and income/loss from discontinued operations.

    Consolidating Adjustments

            Includes Citigroup parent company elimination of distributed and undistributed income of subsidiaries, investment in subsidiaries and the elimination of CCC, which is included in the Associates column.

    188


    Table of Contents

    Condensed Consolidating Statements of Income

     
     Three Months Ended June 30, 2010  
    In millions of dollars Citigroup
    parent
    company
     CGMHI  CFI  CCC  Associates  Other
    Citigroup
    subsidiaries,
    eliminations
    and income
    from
    discontinued
    operations
     Consolidating
    adjustments
     Citigroup
    consolidated
     

    Revenues

                             

    Dividends from subsidiary banks and bank holding companies

     $8,827 $ $ $ $ $ $(8,827)$ 

    Interest revenue

      68 $1,561 $ $1,329 $1,523 $17,266 $(1,329)$20,418 

    Interest revenue—intercompany

      539  431  813  20  95  (1,878) (20)  

    Interest expense

      2,163  575  467  23  53  3,121  (23) 6,379 

    Interest expense—intercompany

      (206) 410  74  508  332  (610) (508)  
                      

    Net interest revenue

     $(1,350)$1,007 $272 $818 $1,233 $12,877 $(818)$14,039 
                      

    Commissions and fees

     $ $925 $ $12 $42 $2,262 $(12)$3,229 

    Commissions and fees—intercompany

        23    37  42  (65) (37)  

    Principal transactions

      48  2,226  212    (4) (265)   2,217 

    Principal transactions—intercompany

      1  (1,277) 116    (105) 1,265     

    Other income

      (1,357) 49  200  111  232  3,462  (111) 2,586 

    Other income—intercompany

      1,330  (25) (218) (1) 7  (1,094) 1   
                      

    Total non-interest revenues

     $22 $1,921 $310 $159 $214 $5,565 $(159)$8,032 
                      

    Total revenues, net of interest expense

     $7,499 $2,928 $582 $977 $1,447 $18,442 $(9,804)$22,071 
                      

    Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

     $ $23 $ $618 $702 $5,940 $(618)$6,665 
                      

    Expenses

                             

    Compensation and benefits

     $(2)$1,367 $ $158 $209 $4,387 $(158)$5,961 

    Compensation and benefits—intercompany

      1  52    33  33  (86) (33)  

    Other expense

      65  1,023    123  167  4,650  (123) 5,905 

    Other expense—intercompany

      91  (49) 2  141  153  (197) (141)  
                      

    Total operating expenses

     $155 $2,393 $2 $455 $562 $8,754 $(455)$11,866 
                      

    Income (loss) before taxes and equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries

     $7,344 $512 $580 $(96)$183 $3,748 $(8,731)$3,540 

    Income taxes (benefits)

      (406) 165  199  (30) 47  807  30  812 

    Equities in undistributed income of subsidiaries

      (5,053)           5,053   
                      

    Income (loss) from continuing operations

     $2,697 $347 $381 $(66)$136 $2,941 $(3,708)$2,728 

    Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes

                (3)   (3)
                      

    Net income (loss) before attrition of noncontrolling interest

     $2,697 $347 $381 $(66)$136 $2,938 $(3,708)$2,725 
                      

    Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

        2        26    28 
                      

    Citigroup's net income (loss)

     $2,697 $345 $381 $(66)$136 $2,912 $(3,708)$2,697 
                      

    189


    Table of Contents

    Condensed Consolidating Statements of Income

     
     Six Months Ended June 30, 2010  
    In millions of dollars Citigroup
    parent
    company
     CGMHI  CFI  CCC  Associates  Other
    Citigroup
    subsidiaries,
    eliminations
    and income
    from
    discontinued
    operations
     Consolidating
    adjustments
     Citigroup
    consolidated
     

    Revenues

                             

    Dividends from subsidiary banks and bank holding companies

     $11,604 $ $ $ $ $ $(11,604)$ 

    Interest revenue

     $143 $3,051 $ $2,728 $3,129 $34,947 $(2,728)$41,270 

    Interest revenue—intercompany

      1,047  996  1,637  40  191  (3,871) (40)  

    Interest expense

      4,351  1,097  1,266  47  147  5,809  (47) 12,670 

    Interest expense—intercompany

      (405) 1,076  (208) 1,025  640  (1,103) (1,025)  
                      

    Net interest revenue

     $(2,756)$1,874 $579 $1,696 $2,533 $26,370 $(1,696)$28,600 
                      

    Commissions and fees

     $ $2,212 $ $23 $75 $4,587 $(23)$6,874 

    Commissions and fees—intercompany

        81    77  86  (167) (77)  

    Principal transactions

      (69) 6,047  501    (6) (103)   6,370 

    Principal transactions—intercompany

      (3)$(2,945) (157)   (123) 3,228     

    Other income

      (338) 401    214  373  5,212  (214) 5,648 

    Other income—intercompany

      505  5      16  (526)    
                      

    Total non-interest revenues

     $95 $5,801 $344 $314 $421 $12,231 $(314)$18,892 
                      

    Total revenues, net of interest expense

     $8,943 $7,675 $923 $2,010 $2,954 $38,601 $(13,614)$47,492 
                      

    Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

     $ $27 $ $1,303 $1,452 $13,804 $(1,303)$15,283 
                      

    Expenses

                             

    Compensation and benefits

     $100 $2,863 $ $284 $389 $8,771 $(284)$12,123 

    Compensation and benefits—intercompany

      3  106    67  67  (176) (67)  

    Other expense

      205  1,517    235  319  9,220  (235) 11,261 

    Other expense—intercompany

      155  192  4  320  340  (691) (320)  
                      

    Total operating expenses

     $463 $4,678 $4 $906 $1,115 $17,124 $(906)$23,384 
                      

    Income (loss) before taxes and equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries

     $8,480 $2,970 $919 $(199)$387 $7,673 $(11,405)$8,825 

    Income taxes (benefits)

      (1,476) 985  318  (72) 114  1,907  72  1,848 

    Equities in undistributed income of subsidiaries

      (2,831)           2,831   
                      

    Income (loss) from continuing operations

     $7,125 $1,985 $601 $(127)$273 $5,766 $(8,646)$6,977 

    Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes

                208    208 
                      

    Net income (loss) before attrition of noncontrolling interest

     $7,125 $1,985 $601 $(127)$273 $5,974 $(8,646)$7,185 
                      

    Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

        16        44    60 
                      

    Citigroup's net income (loss)

     $7,125 $1,969 $601 $(127)$273 $5,930 $(8,646)$7,125 
                      

    190


    Table of Contents

    Condensed Consolidating Statements of Income

     
     Three Months Ended June 30, 2009  
    In millions of dollars Citigroup
    parent
    company
     CGMHI  CFI  CCC  Associates  Other
    Citigroup
    subsidiaries,
    eliminations
     Consolidating
    adjustments
     Citigroup
    consolidated
     

    Revenues

                             

    Dividends from subsidiary banks and bank holding companies

     $16 $ $ $ $ $ $(16)$ 

    Interest revenue

     $57 $1,930 $1 $1,573 $1,795 $15,888 $(1,573)$19,671 

    Interest revenue—intercompany

      554  1,461  1,030  (1,653) 113  (3,158) 1,653   

    Interest expense

      1,988  725  449  21  117  3,563  (21) 6,842 

    Interest expense—intercompany

      (294) 701  260  (1,111) 395  (1,062) 1,111   
                      

    Net interest revenue

     $(1,083)$1,965 $322 $1,010 $1,396 $10,229 $(1,010)$12,829 
                      

    Commissions and fees

     $ $1,829 $ $11 $29 $2,226 $(11)$4,084 

    Commissions and fees—intercompany

        26    16  23  (49) (16)  

    Principal transactions

      474  575  (1,245)   2  1,982    1,788 

    Principal transactions—intercompany

      (364) 772  614    (76) (946)    

    Other income

      1,150  11,918  115  107  199  (2,114) (107) 11,268 

    Other income—intercompany

      (2,022) (53) (91) 2  8  2,158  (2)  
                      

    Total non-interest revenues

     $(762)$15,067 $(607)$136 $185 $3,257 $(136)$17,140 
                      

    Total revenues, net of interest expense

     $(1,829)$17,032 $(285)$1,146 $1,581 $13,486 $(1,162)$29,969 
                      

    Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

     $ $14 $ $982 $1,118 $11,544 $(982)$12,676 
                      

    Expenses

                             

    Compensation and benefits

     $5 $1,816 $ $139 $187 $4,351 $(139)$6,359 

    Compensation and benefits— intercompany

      1  142    71  34  (177) (71)  

    Other expense

      180  669    80  115  4,676  (80) 5,640 

    Other expense—intercompany

      (12) 334  2  107  152  (476) (107)  
                      

    Total operating expenses

     $174 $2,961 $2 $397 $488 $8,374 $(397)$11,999 
                      

    Income (loss) before taxes and equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries

     $(2,003)$14,057 $(287)$(233)$(25)$(6,432)$217 $5,294 

    Income taxes (benefits)

      (1,696) 5,472  (117) (89) (17) (2,735) 89  907 

    Equities in undistributed income of subsidiaries

      4,586            (4,586)  
                      

    Income (loss) from continuing operations

     $4,279 $8,585 $(170)$(144)$(8)$(3,697)$(4,458)$4,387 

    Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes

                (142)   (142)
                      

    Net income (loss) before attribution of noncontrolling interests

     $4,279 $8,585 $(170)$(144)$(8)$(3,839)$(4,458)$4,245 
                      

    Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

        (50)       16    (34)
                      

    Citigroup's net income (loss)

     $4,279 $8,635 $(170)$(144)$(8)$(3,855)$(4,458)$4,279 
                      

    191


    Table of Contents

    Condensed Consolidating Statements of Income

     
     Six Months Ended June 30, 2009  
    In millions of dollars Citigroup
    parent
    company
     CGMHI  CFI  CCC  Associates  Other
    Citigroup
    subsidiaries,
    eliminations
     Consolidating
    adjustments
     Citigroup
    consolidated
     

    Revenues

                             

    Dividends from subsidiary banks and bank holding companies

     $35 $ $ $ $ $ $(35)$ 

    Interest revenue

     $177 $4,199 $1 $3,206 $3,659 $32,218 $(3,206)$40,254 

    Interest revenue—intercompany

      1,356  2,169  2,090  (1,643) 229  (5,844) 1,643   

    Interest expense

      4,212  1,416  965  46  219  7,687  (46) 14,499 

    Interest expense—intercompany

      (530) 1,800  439  (535) 865  (2,574) 535   
                      

    Net interest revenue

     $(2,149)$3,152 $687 $2,052 $2,804 $21,261 $(2,052)$25,755 
                      

    Commissions and fees

     $ $3,482 $ $22 $59 $4,527 $(22)$8,068 

    Commissions and fees—intercompany

        59    35  44  (103) (35)  

    Principal transactions

      117  (1,129) (259)     6,972    5,701 

    Principal transactions—intercompany

      (221) 3,910  (59)   (86) (3,544)    

    Other income

      4,672  12,620  75  209  347  (2,748) (209) 14,966 

    Other income—intercompany

      (4,391) (35) (61) 2  32  4,455  (2)  
                      

    Total non-interest revenues

     $177 $18,907 $(304)$268 $396 $9,559 $(268)$28,735 
                      

    Total revenues, net of interest expense

     $(1,937)$22,059 $383 $2,320 $3,200 $30,820 $(2,355)$54,490 
                      

    Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

     $ $38 $ $1,938 $2,169 $20,776 $(1,938)$22,983 
                      

    Expenses

                             

    Compensation and benefits

     $(45)$3,673 $ $259 $335 $8,631 $(259)$12,594 

    Compensation and benefits— intercompany

      3  335    71  71  (409) (71)  

    Other expense

      408  1,328  1  189  262  9,091  (189) 11,090 

    Other expense—intercompany

      97  340  5  273  305  (747) (273)  
                      

    Total operating expenses

     $463 $5,676 $6 $792 $973 $16,566 $(792)$23,684 
                      

    Income (loss) before taxes and equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries

     $(2,400)$16,345 $377 $(410)$58 $(6,522)$375 $7,823 

    Income taxes (benefits)

      (1,045) 6,164  115  (148) 15  (3,507) 148  1,742 

    Equities in undistributed income of subsidiaries

      7,227            (7,227)  
                      

    Income (loss) from continuing operations

     $5,872 $10,181 $262 $(262)$43 $(3,015)$(7,000)$6,081 

    Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes

                (259)   (259)
                      

    Net income (loss) before attribution of noncontrolling interests

     $5,872 $10,181 $262 $(262)$43 $(3,274)$(7,000)$5,822 
                      

    Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

        (51)       1    (50)
                      

    Citigroup's net income (loss)

     $5,872 $10,232 $262 $(262)$43 $(3,275)$(7,000)$5,872 
                      

    192


    Table of Contents


    Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet

     
     June 30, 2010  
    In millions of dollars Citigroup
    parent
    company
     CGMHI  CFI  CCC  Associates  Other
    Citigroup
    subsidiaries
    and
    eliminations
     Consolidating
    adjustments
     Citigroup
    consolidated
     

    Assets

                             

    Cash and due from banks

      $  $2,011  $  $202  $268  $22,430  $(202) $24,709 

    Cash and due from banks—intercompany

       6   2,816   1   144   168   (2,991)  (144)  

    Federal funds sold and resale agreements

         187,987         42,797     230,784 

    Federal funds sold and resale agreements—intercompany

         17,696         (17,696)    

    Trading account assets

       18   138,077       18   171,299     309,412 

    Trading account assets—intercompany

       58   7,312   31       (7,401)    

    Investments

       10,413   198     2,455   2,550   303,905   (2,455)  317,066 

    Loans, net of unearned income

         396     35,996   41,219   650,551   (35,996)  692,166 

    Loans, net of unearned income—intercompany

           82,130   3,525   7,992   (90,122)  (3,525)  

    Allowance for loan losses

         (42)    (3,468)  (3,818)  (42,337)  3,468   (46,197)
                      

    Total loans, net

      $  $354  $82,130  $36,053  $45,393  $518,092  $(36,053) $645,969 

    Advances to subsidiaries

       137,718           (137,718)    

    Investments in subsidiaries

       205,029             (205,029)  

    Other assets

       18,353   70,693   683   9,127   10,068   309,919   (9,127)  409,716 

    Other assets—intercompany

       13,807   33,963   2,292   6   1,718   (51,780)  (6)  
                      

    Total assets

      $385,402  $461,107  $85,137  $47,987  $60,183  $1,150,856  $(253,016) $1,937,656 
                      

    Liabilities and equity

                             

    Deposits

      $  $  $  $  $  $813,951  $  $813,951 

    Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold

         151,947         44,165     196,112 

    Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold—intercompany

       185   7,204         (7,389)    

    Trading account liabilities

         78,199   94       52,708     131,001 

    Trading account liabilities—intercompany

       56   5,249   174       (5,479)    

    Short-term borrowings

       19   3,388   11,730     656   76,959     92,752 

    Short-term borrowings—intercompany

         56,938   17,240   8,297   2,941   (77,119)  (8,297)  

    Long-term debt

       188,756   10,352   51,975   1,297   4,724   157,490   (1,297)  413,297 

    Long-term debt—intercompany

       354   58,205   1,829   29,512   42,499   (102,887)  (29,512)  

    Advances from subsidiaries

       26,590           (26,590)    

    Other liabilities

       7,756   60,507   336   3,034   3,007   61,607   (3,034)  133,213 

    Other liabilities—intercompany

       6,880   12,904   117   1,031   490   (20,391)  (1,031)  
                      

    Total liabilities

      $230,596  $444,893  $83,495  $43,171  $54,317  $967,025  $(43,171) $1,780,326 
                      

    Citigroup stockholders' equity

       154,806   15,785   1,642   4,816   5,866   181,736   (209,845)  154,806 

    Noncontrolling interest

         429         2,095     2,524 
                      

    Total equity

      $154,806  $16,214  $1,642  $4,816  $5,866  $183,831  $(209,845) $157,330 
                      

    Total liabilities and equity

      $385,402  $461,107  $85,137  $47,987  $60,183  $1,150,856  $(253,016) $1,937,656 
                      

    193


    Table of Contents

    Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet

     
     December 31, 2009  
    In millions of dollars
     Citigroup
    parent
    company
     CGMHI  CFI  CCC  Associates  Other
    Citigroup
    subsidiaries
    and
    eliminations
     Consolidating
    adjustments
     Citigroup
    consolidated
     

    Assets

                             

    Cash and due from banks

      $  $1,801  $  $198  $297  $23,374  $(198) $25,472 

    Cash and due from banks—intercompany

       5   3,146   1   145   168   (3,320)  (145)  

    Federal funds sold and resale agreements

         199,760         22,262     222,022 

    Federal funds sold and resale agreements—intercompany

         20,626         (20,626)    

    Trading account assets

       26   140,777   71     17   201,882     342,773 

    Trading account assets—intercompany

       196   6,812   788       (7,796)    

    Investments

       13,318   237     2,293   2,506   290,058   (2,293)  306,119 

    Loans, net of unearned income

         248     42,739   48,821   542,435   (42,739)  591,504 

    Loans, net of unearned income—intercompany

           129,317   3,387   7,261   (136,578)  (3,387)  

    Allowance for loan losses

         (83)    (3,680)  (4,056)  (31,894)  3,680   (36,033)
                      

    Total loans, net

      $  $165  $129,317  $42,446  $52,026  $373,963  $(42,446) $555,471 

    Advances to subsidiaries

       144,497           (144,497)    

    Investments in subsidiaries

       210,895             (210,895)  

    Other assets

       14,196   69,907   1,186   6,440   7,317   312,183   (6,440)  404,789 

    Other assets—intercompany

       10,412   38,047   3,168   47   1,383   (53,010)  (47)  
                      

    Total assets

      $393,545  $481,278  $134,531  $51,569  $63,714  $994,473  $(262,464) $1,856,646 
                      

    Liabilities and equity

                             

    Deposits

      $  $  $  $  $  $835,903  $  $835,903 

    Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold

         124,522         29,759     154,281 

    Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold—intercompany

       185   18,721         (18,906)    

    Trading account liabilities

         82,905   115       54,492     137,512 

    Trading account liabilities—intercompany

       198   7,495   1,082       (8,775)    

    Short-term borrowings

       1,177   4,593   10,136     379   52,594     68,879 

    Short-term borrowings—intercompany

         69,306   62,336   3,304   33,818   (165,460)  (3,304)  

    Long-term debt

       197,804   13,422   55,499   2,893   7,542   89,752   (2,893)  364,019 

    Long-term debt—intercompany

       367   62,050   1,039   37,600   14,278   (77,734)  (37,600)  

    Advances from subsidiaries

       30,275           (30,275)    

    Other liabilities

       5,985   70,477   585   1,772   1,742   62,290   (1,772)  141,079 

    Other liabilities—intercompany

       4,854   7,911   198   1,080   386   (13,349)  (1,080)  
                      

    Total liabilities

      $240,845  $461,402  $130,990  $46,649  $58,145  $810,291  $(46,649) $1,701,673 
                      

    Citigroup stockholders' equity

       152,700   19,448   3,541   4,920   5,569   182,337   (215,815)  152,700 

    Noncontrolling interest

         428         1,845     2,273 
                      

    Total equity

      $152,700  $19,876  $3,541  $4,920  $5,569  $184,182  $(215,815) $154,973 
                      

    Total liabilities and equity

      $393,545  $481,278  $134,531  $51,569  $63,714  $994,473  $(262,464) $1,856,646 
                      

    194


    Table of Contents


    Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows

     
     Six Months Ended June 30, 2010  
    In millions of dollars Citigroup
    parent
    company
     CGMHI  CFI  CCC  Associates  Other
    Citigroup
    subsidiaries
    and
    eliminations
     Consolidating
    adjustments
     Citigroup
    Consolidated
     

    Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

     $3,845 $20,709 $1,277 $(3,652)$(3,356)$19,126 $3,652 $41,601 
                      

    Cash flows from investing activities

                             

    Change in loans

     $ $32 $47,497 $7,382 $8,040 $(255)$(7,382)$55,314 

    Proceeds from sales and securitizations of loans

        68    126  126  3,558  (126) 3,752 

    Purchases of investments

      (2,796) (4)   (342) (348) (197,699) 342  (200,847)

    Proceeds from sales of investments

      874  32    109  220  77,857  (109) 78,983 

    Proceeds from maturities of investments

      5,079      143  152  90,575  (143) 95,806 

    Changes in investments and advances—intercompany

      2,643  3,475    (138) (731) (5,387) 138   

    Business acquisitions

      (20)         20     

    Other investing activities

        588        6,682    7,270 
                      

    Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

     $5,780 $4,191 $47,497 $7,280 $7,459 $(24,649)$(7,280)$40,278 
                      

    Cash flows from financing activities

                             

    Dividends paid

     $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 

    Dividends paid-intercompany

        (5,500) (1,500)     7,000     

    Issuance of common stock

                     

    Issuance of preferred stock

                     

    Treasury stock acquired

      (5)             (5)

    Proceeds/(Repayments) from issuance of long-term debt—third-party, net

      (6,821) (2,065) (3,773) (530) (1,752) (14,201) 530  (28,612)

    Proceeds/(Repayments) from issuance of long-term debt-intercompany, net

        (3,882)   (8,088) (2,279) 6,161  8,088   

    Change in deposits

                (21,952)   (21,952)

    Net change in short-term borrowings and other investment banking and brokerage borrowings—third-party

      11  (1,205) 1,734    277  (34,044)   (33,227)

    Net change in short-term borrowings and other advances—intercompany

      (3,960) (12,368) (45,235) 4,993  (377) 61,940  (4,993)  

    Capital contributions from parent

                     

    Other financing activities

      1,151              1,151 
                      

    Net cash used in financing activities

     $(9,624)$(25,020)$(48,774)$(3,625)$(4,131)$4,904 $3,625 $(82,645)
                      

    Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and due from banks

     $ $ $ $ $ $(48)$ $(48)
                      

    Net cash provided by discontinued operations

     $ $ $ $ $ $51 $ $51 
                      

    Net increase (decrease) in cash and due from banks

     $1 $(120)$ $3 $(28)$(616)$(3)$(763)

    Cash and due from banks at beginning of period

      5  4,947  1  343  464  20,055  (343) 25,472 
                      

    Cash and due from banks at end of period

     $6 $4,827 $1 $346 $436 $19,439 $(346)$24,709 
                      

    Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information

                             

    Cash paid during the year for:

                             

    Income taxes

     $(308)$117 $259 $(142)$181 $2,520 $142 $2,769 

    Interest

      4,703  2,430  642  1,145  781  3,545  (1,145) 12,101 

    Non-cash investing activities:

                             

    Transfers to repossessed assets

     $ $193 $ $683 $714 $591 $(683)$1,498 
                      

    195


    Table of Contents

    Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows

     
     Six Months Ended June 30, 2009  
    In millions of dollars Citigroup
    parent
    company
     CGMHI  CFI  CCC  Associates  Other
    Citigroup
    subsidiaries
    and
    eliminations
     Consolidating
    adjustments
     Citigroup
    Consolidated
     

    Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities

     $(3,928)$21,483 $2,262 $2,226 $2,008 $(42,252)$(2,226)$(20,427)
                      

    Cash flows from investing activities

                             

    Change in loans

     $ $ $(11,257)$1,081 $1,175 $(76,652)$(1,081)$(86,734)

    Proceeds from sales and securitizations of loans

        163        126,871    127,034 

    Purchases of investments

      (12,895) (13)   (401) (431) (107,022) 401  (120,361)

    Proceeds from sales of investments

      6,892      159  191  40,358  (159) 47,441 

    Proceeds from maturities of investments

      19,559      185  216  37,761  (185) 57,536 

    Changes in investments and advances—intercompany

      (12,386)     (1,960) 4,374  8,012  1,960   

    Business acquisitions

                     

    Other investing activities

        (4,104)       (4,355)   (8,459)
                      

    Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

     $1,170 $(3,954)$(11,257)$(936)$5,525 $24,973 $936 $16,457 
                      

    Cash flows from financing activities

                             

    Dividends paid

     $(2,539)$ $ $ $ $ $  (2,539)

    Dividends paid-intercompany

      (119)         119     

    Issuance of common stock

                     

    Issuance of preferred stock

                     

    Treasury stock acquired

      (2)             (2)

    Proceeds/(Repayments) from issuance of long-term debt—third-party, net

      4,231  (1,515) 6,975  (450) (1,416) (14,722) 450  (6,447)

    Proceeds/(Repayments) from issuance of long-term debt-intercompany, net

        (14,241)   (7,242) (1,994) 16,235  7,242   

    Change in deposits

                30,552    30,552 

    Net change in short-term borrowings and other investment banking and brokerage borrowings—third-party

        (4,099) (2,372) 6,406  (152) (13,874) (6,406) (20,497)

    Net change in short-term borrowings and other advances—intercompany

      1,304  1,617  4,397    (3,974) (3,344)    

    Capital contributions from parent

                     

    Other financing activities

      (108)   (5)     5    (108)
                      

    Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

     $2,767 $(18,238)$8,995 $(1,286)$(7,536)$14,971 $1,286 $959 
                      

    Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and due from banks

     $         $171   $171 
                      

    Net cash provided by discontinued operations

     $         $502   $502 
                      

    Net increase (decrease) in cash and due from banks

     $9 $(709)$ $4 $(3)$(1,635)$(4)$(2,338)

    Cash and due from banks at beginning of period

      13  4,557  1  290  396  24,286  (290) 29,253 
                      

    Cash and due from banks at end of period

     $22 $3,848 $1 $294 $393 $22,651 $(294)$26,915 
                      

    Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information

                             

    Cash paid during the year for:

                             

    Income taxes

     $(36)$(522)$280 $(172)$193 $(500)$172 $(585)

    Interest

      4,282  4,448  1,641  1,893  408  4,305  (1,893) 15,084 

    Non-cash investing activities:

                             

    Transfers to repossessed assets

     $ $ $ $779 $806 $557 $(779)$1,363 
                      

    196


    Table of Contents


    PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

    Item 1.    Legal Proceedings

            The following information supplements and amends our discussion set forth under Part I, Item 3 "Legal Proceedings" in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 (2009 Form 10-K), as updated by our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010.

    Credit-Crisis-Related Litigation and Other Matters

            As discussed at pages 263-265 of our 2009 Form 10-K, Citigroup and its affiliates continue to defend lawsuits and arbitrations asserting claims for damages and other relief for losses arising from the global financial credit and subprime-mortgage crisis that began in 2007. These actions, which assert a variety of claims under federal and state law, include, among other matters, class actions brought on behalf of putative classes of investors in various securities issued by Citigroup as well as actions asserted by individual investors and counterparties to various transactions, and are pending in various state and federal courts as well as before arbitration tribunals. These actions are at various procedural stages of litigation.

            In addition to these litigations and arbitrations, Citigroup continues to cooperate fully in response to subpoenas and requests for information from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and other government agencies in connection with various formal and informal inquiries concerning Citigroup's subprime-mortgage-related conduct and business activities, as well as other business activities affected by the credit crisis. On July 29, 2010, the SEC announced the settlement of an investigation into certain of Citigroup's 2007 disclosures concerning its subprime-related business activities. In connection with the settlement, Citigroup agreed to pay a civil penalty in the amount of $75 million. The settlement is subject to court approval.

            In accordance with ASC 450 (formerly SFAS 5), Citigroup establishes accruals for all litigation and regulatory matters, including matters related to the credit crisis, when it is probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Once established, accruals are adjusted from time to time, as appropriate, in light of additional information. The amount of loss ultimately incurred in relation to those matters may be substantially higher or lower than the amounts accrued for those matters.

            Certain of these matters assert claims for substantial or indeterminate damages. The claims asserted in these matters typically are broad, often spanning a multi-year period and sometimes a wide range of business activities, and the plaintiffs' alleged damages typically are not quantified or factually supported in the complaint. The most significant of these matters remains in very preliminary stages, with few or no substantive legal decisions by the court or tribunal defining the scope of the claims, the class (if any), or the potentially available damages, and fact discovery is still in progress or not yet begun. In many of these matters, Citigroup has not yet answered the complaint or asserted its defenses. For all these reasons, Citigroup cannot at this time estimate the possible loss or range of loss, if any, for these matters or predict the timing of their eventual resolution.

            Subject to the foregoing, it is the opinion of Citigroup's management, based on current knowledge and after taking into account available insurance coverage and its current accruals, that the eventual outcome of these matters would not be likely to have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial condition of Citi. Nonetheless, given the inherent unpredictability of litigation and the substantial or indeterminate amounts sought in certain of these matters, an adverse outcome in certain of these matters could, from time to time, have a material adverse effect on Citi's consolidated results of operations or cash flows in particular quarterly or annual periods.

    Subprime-Mortgage-Related Litigation and Other Matters

            Securities Actions:    On July 12, 2010, the district court issued an order and opinion granting in part and denying in part defendants' motion to dismiss the consolidated class action complaint in IN RE CITIGROUP INC. BOND LITIGATION. In this action, lead plaintiffs assert claims on behalf of a putative class of purchasers of forty-eight corporate debt securities, preferred stock, and interests in preferred stock issued by Citigroup and related issuers over a two-year period from 2006 to 2008. The court's order, among other things, dismissed plaintiffs' claims under Section 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 but denied defendants' motion to dismiss certain claims under Section 11 of that Act. A motion for partial reconsideration of the latter ruling is pending. Fact discovery has not yet begun, a class certification motion has not yet been filed, and plaintiffs have not yet quantified the putative class's alleged damages. Because of the preliminary stage of the proceedings, Citigroup cannot at this time estimate the possible loss or range of loss, if any, for this action or predict the timing of its eventual resolution. Additional information relating to this action is publicly available in court filings under the consolidated lead docket number 08 Civ. 9522 (S.D.N.Y.) (Stein, J.).

            Subprime Counterparty and Investor Actions:    On June 7, 2010, in connection with a global settlement agreement between Ambac and Citigroup, the parties stipulated to a discontinuation with prejudice of a lawsuit brought by Ambac Credit Products LLC.

    Lehman Structured Notes Matters

            In Turkey, Hungary and Greece, Citigroup has made a settlement offer to all eligible purchasers of notes distributed by Citigroup in those countries. A significant majority of the eligible purchasers have accepted this offer.

            In Belgium, the criminal trial against a Citigroup subsidiary, two current employees and one former employee has been completed. The court is scheduled to deliver its judgment on December 1, 2010. The Public Prosecutor seeks a monetary penalty of approximately 132 million Euro.

    Research Analyst Litigation

            On June 23, 2010, the Second Circuit affirmed the dismissal of the remaining claims in HOLMES v. GRUBMAN.

    197


    Table of Contents

    Cash Balance Plan Litigation

            On June 28, 2010, the Supreme Court denied plaintiffs' petition for a writ of certiorari seeking review of the Second Circuit's decision.

    Terra Firma Litigation

            Plaintiffs, general partners of two related private equity funds, filed a complaint in New York state court against certain Citigroup entities in December 2009, alleging that 21/2 years earlier, during the May 2007 auction of the music company EMI, Citigroup, as advisor to EMI and as a potential lender to plaintiffs' acquisition vehicle Maltby, fraudulently or negligently orally misrepresented the intentions of another potential bidder regarding the auction. Plaintiffs allege that but for the oral misrepresentations Maltby would not have acquired EMI for approximately £4 billion. Plaintiffs further allege that, following the acquisition of EMI, certain Citigroup entities have tortiously interfered with plaintiffs' business relationship with EMI. Plaintiffs seek billions of dollars in damages. Citigroup believes it has strong factual and legal defenses to the claims asserted by plaintiffs, including that no misrepresentation occurred, plaintiffs did not rely on the alleged misrepresentation in making their multi-billion-dollar investment in EMI, Citigroup has properly exercised its legal rights as a lender in relation to the approximately £2.5 billion of financing it provided Maltby, and plaintiffs suffered no damages. Because, among other reasons, the parties have widely divergent views of the merits, and they have not yet briefed either summary judgment motions that may resolve the matter in whole or significant part or motions in limine that may limit the testimony a jury would hear at trial, including as to damages, Citigroup cannot at this time estimate the possible loss or range of loss, if any, for this action. The case, captioned TERRA FIRMA INVESTMENTS (GP) 2 LIMITED, et al., v. CITIGROUP, INC., et al., was removed to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, where it is currently pending under docket number 09-cv-10459 (JSR). Additional information regarding the action is publicly available in court filings under that docket number. Trial is scheduled for October 2010.

    Asset Repurchase Matters

            Beginning in March 2010, various regulators have made inquiries regarding the accounting treatment of certain repurchase transactions. Citigroup is cooperating fully with these inquiries.



            Payments required in settlement agreements described above have been made or are covered by existing accruals. Additional lawsuits containing claims similar to those described above may be filed in the future.

    198


    Table of Contents

    Item 1A.    Risk Factors

            For a discussion of the risk factors affecting Citigroup, see "Risk Factors" in Part I, Item 1A of Citi's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.

    199


    Table of Contents

    Item 2.    UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

    Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities

            None.

    Share Repurchases

            Under its long-standing repurchase program, Citigroup may buy back common shares in the market or otherwise from time to time. This program is used for many purposes, including offsetting dilution from stock-based compensation programs.

            The following table summarizes Citigroup's share repurchases during the first six months of 2010:

    In millions, except per share amounts Total shares
    purchased(1)
     Average
    price paid
    per share
     Approximate dollar
    value of shares that
    may yet be purchased
    under the plan or
    programs
     

    First quarter 2010

              
     

    Open market repurchases(1)

        $  $6,739 
     

    Employee transactions(2)

       12.5   3.57   N/A 
            

    Total first quarter 2010

       12.5  $3.57  $6,739 
            

    April 2010

              
     

    Open market repurchases(1)

        $  $6,739 
     

    Employee transactions(2)

       120.9   4.93   N/A 

    May 2010

              
     

    Open market repurchases(1)

        $  $6,739 
     

    Employee transactions(2)

           N/A 

    June 2010

              
     

    Open market repurchases(1)

        $  $6,739 
     

    Employee transactions(2)

       0.3   4.09   N/A 
            

    Second quarter 2010

              
     

    Open market repurchases(1)

        $  $6,739 
     

    Employee transactions(2)

       121.2   4.93   N/A 
            

    Total second quarter 2010

       121.2  $4.93  $6,739 
            

    Year-to-date 2010

              
            
     

    Open market repurchases(1)

        $  $6,739 
            
     

    Employee transactions(2)

       133.7   4.80   N/A 
            

    Total year-to-date 2010

       133.7  $4.80  $6,739 
            

    (1)
    Open market repurchases would be transacted under an existing authorized share repurchase plan. Since 2000, the Board of Directors has authorized the repurchase of shares in the aggregate amount of $40 billion under Citi's existing share repurchase plan.

    (2)
    Consists of shares added to treasury stock related to activity on employee stock option program exercises, where the employee delivers existing shares to cover the option exercise, or under Citi's employee restricted or deferred stock program, where shares are withheld to satisfy tax requirements.

    N/A    Not applicable

            For so long as the U.S. government holds any Citigroup common stock or trust preferred securities, Citigroup has generally agreed not to acquire, repurchase or redeem any Citigroup equity or trust preferred securities, other than pursuant to administrating its employee benefit plans or other customary exceptions, or with the consent of the U.S. government.

    200


    Table of Contents

    Item 6.    Exhibits

            See Exhibit Index.

    201


    Table of Contents


    SIGNATURES

            Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on the 6th day of August, 2010.


     

     

    CITIGROUP INC.
        (Registrant)

     

     

    By

     

    /s/ JOHN C. GERSPACH

    John C. Gerspach
    Chief Financial Officer
    (Principal Financial Officer)

     

     

    By

     

    /s/ JEFFREY R. WALSH

    Jeffrey R. Walsh
    Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
    (Principal Accounting Officer)

    202


    Table of Contents


    EXHIBIT INDEX

     2.01 Amended and Restated Joint Venture Contribution and Formation Agreement, dated May 29, 2009, by and among Citigroup Inc. (the Company), Morgan Stanley and Morgan Stanley Smith Barney Holdings LLC, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 3, 2009 (File No. 1-9924).

     

    2.02

     

    Share Purchase Agreement, dated May 1, 2009, by and among Nikko Citi Holdings Inc., Nikko Cordial Securities Inc., Nikko Citi Business Services Inc., Nikko Citigroup Limited, and Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.02 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2009 (File No. 1-9924).

     

    2.03

     

    Share Purchase Agreement, dated July 11, 2008, by and between Citigroup Global Markets Finance Corporation & Co. Beschrankt Haftende KG, CM Akquisitions GmbH, and Banque Federative du Credit Mutuel S.A., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.01 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2008 (File No. 1-9924).

     

    3.01

     

    Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.01 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2009 (File No. 1-9924).

     

    3.02

     

    By-Laws of the Company, as amended, effective December 15, 2009, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 16, 2009 (File No. 1-9924).

     

    4.01

     

    Warrant, dated October 28, 2008, issued by the Company to the United States Department of the Treasury (the UST), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 30, 2008 (File No. 1-9924).

     

    4.02

     

    Warrant, dated December 31, 2008, issued by the Company to the UST, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 31, 2008 (File No. 1-9924).

     

    4.03

     

    Warrant, dated January 15, 2009, issued by the Company to the UST, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 16, 2009 (File No. 1-9924).

     

    4.04

     

    Tax Benefits Preservation Plan, dated June 9, 2009, between the Company and Computershare Trust Company, N.A., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 10, 2009 (File No. 1-9924).

     

    4.05

     

    Capital Securities Guarantee Agreement, dated as of July 30, 2009, between the Company, as Guarantor, and The Bank of New York Mellon, as Guarantee Trustee, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.03 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 30, 2009 (File No. 1-9924).

     

    10.01

     

    Equity Distribution Agreement, dated April 26, 2010, among the Company, the UST and Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 26, 2010 (File No. 1-9924).

     

    10.02

     

    Citigroup 2009 Stock Incentive Plan (as amended and restated effective April 20, 2010), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed April 22, 2010 (No. 333-166242).

     

    10.03

     

    Letter Agreement, dated April 5, 2010, between the Company and Dr. Robert L. Joss, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.03 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2010 (File No. 1-9924).

     

    12.01

    +

    Calculation of Ratio of Income to Fixed Charges.

     

    12.02

    +

    Calculation of Ratio of Income to Fixed Charges (including preferred stock dividends).

     

    31.01

    +

    Certification of principal executive officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

     

    31.02

    +

    Certification of principal financial officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

     

    32.01

    +

    Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

     

    101.01

    +

    Financial statements from the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Citigroup Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, filed on August 6, 2010, formatted in XBRL: (i) the Consolidated Statement of Income, (ii) the Consolidated Balance Sheet, (iii) the

     

     

     

     

    203


    Table of Contents

       Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity, (iv) the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows and (v) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

    The total amount of securities authorized pursuant to any instrument defining rights of holders of long-term debt of the Company does not exceed 10% of the total assets of the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries. The Company will furnish copies of any such instrument to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.

    +
    Filed herewith

    204