UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
For the quarterly period ended May 31, 2010
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 001-33378
DISCOVER FINANCIAL SERVICES
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
2500 Lake Cook Road,
Riverwoods, Illinois 60015
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer x
Non-accelerated filer ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act.) Yes ¨ No x
As of June 30, 2010, there were 544,036,855 shares of the registrant’s Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, outstanding.
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended May 31, 2010
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Part I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Part II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Item 4. (Removed and Reserved)
Item 5. Other Information
Item 6. Exhibits
Except as otherwise indicated or unless the context otherwise requires, “Discover Financial Services,” “Discover,” “DFS,” “we,” “us,” “our,” and “the Company” refer to Discover Financial Services and its subsidiaries.
We own or have rights to use the trademarks, trade names and service marks that we use in conjunction with the operation of our business, including, but not limited to: Discover®, PULSE®, Cashback Bonus®, Discover®More® Card, Discover®MotivaSM Card, Discover® Open Road® Card, Discover® Network and Diners Club International®. All other trademarks, trade names and service marks included in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q are the property of their respective owners.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition
(unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except
per share amounts)
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents
Restricted cash—special dividend escrow
Restricted cash—for securitization investors
Other short-term investments
Investment securities:
Available-for-sale (amortized cost of $952,593 and $2,743,729 at May 31, 2010 and November 30, 2009, respectively)
Held-to-maturity (fair value of $85,103 and $1,953,990 at May 31, 2010 and November 30, 2009, respectively)
Total investments securities
Loan receivables:
Student loans held for sale
Loan portfolio:
Credit card—restricted for securitization investors
Other credit card
Total credit card loan receivables
Other
Total loan portfolio
Total loan receivables
Allowance for loan losses
Net loan receivables
Amounts due from asset securitization
Premises and equipment, net
Goodwill
Intangible assets, net
Other assets
Total assets
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Deposits:
Interest-bearing deposit accounts
Non-interest bearing deposit accounts
Total deposits
Long-term borrowings:
Long-term borrowings—owed to securitization investors
Other long-term borrowings
Total long-term borrowings
Special dividend—Morgan Stanley
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
Total liabilities
Commitments, contingencies and guarantees (Note 13)
Stockholders’ Equity:
Preferred stock, par value $.01 per share; 200,000,000 shares authorized, 0 and 1,224,558 shares issued and outstanding at May 31, 2010 and November 30, 2009, respectively
Common stock, par value $.01 per share; 2,000,000,000 shares authorized; 546,242,968 and 544,799,041 shares issued at May 31, 2010 and November 30, 2009, respectively
Additional paid-in capital
Retained earnings
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income
Treasury stock, at cost; 2,249,868 and 1,876,795 shares at May 31, 2010 and November 30, 2009, respectively
Total stockholders’ equity
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
See Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
1
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income
Interest income:
Credit card loans
Other loans
Investment securities
Other interest income
Total interest income
Interest expense:
Deposits
Short-term borrowings
Long-term borrowings
Total interest expense
Net interest income
Provision for loan losses
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
Other income:
Securitization income
Discount and interchange revenue
Fee products
Loan fee income
Transaction processing revenue
Merchant fees
Gain (loss) on investment securities
Antitrust litigation settlement
Other income
Total other income
Other expense:
Employee compensation and benefits
Marketing and business development
Information processing and communications
Professional fees
Premises and equipment
Other expense
Total other expense
Income before income tax expense
Income tax expense
Net income
Net income allocated to common stockholders
Basic earnings per share
Diluted earnings per share
Dividends paid per share of common stock
2
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity
Balance at November 30, 2008
Adoption of the measurement date provision of ASC 715 (FASB Statement No. 158), net of tax
Comprehensive income:
Adjustments related to investment securities, net of tax
Adjustment related to pension and postretirement benefits, net of tax
Other comprehensive income
Total comprehensive income
Purchase of treasury stock
Common stock issued under employee benefit plans
Common stock issued and stock-based compensation expense
Income tax deficiency on stock-based compensation plans
Issuance of preferred stock
Accretion of preferred stock discount
Dividends—preferred stock
Dividends paid—common stock
Balance at May 31, 2009
Balance at November 30, 2009
Adoption of ASC 810 (FASB Statement No. 167), net of tax
Adjustments related to pension and postretirement benefits, net of tax
Common stock issued and stock based compensation expense
Redemption of preferred stock
Balance at May 31, 2010
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(dollars in thousands)
Cash flows from operating activities
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Net principal disbursed on loans originated for sale
(Gain) loss on investment securities
Gain on disposal of equipment
Stock-based compensation expense
Income tax deficiency on stock-based compensation expense
Deferred income taxes
Depreciation and amortization on premises and equipment
Other depreciation and amortization
Amortization of deferred revenues
Changes in assets and liabilities:
(Increase) decrease in amounts due from asset securitization
(Increase) decrease in other assets
Increase (decrease) in accrued expenses and other liabilities
Net cash provided by operating activities
Cash flows from investing activities
Maturities of other short-term investments
Purchases of other short-term investments
Maturities of available-for-sale investment securities
Purchases of available-for-sale investment securities
Maturities of held-to-maturity investment securities
Purchases of held-to-maturity investment securities
Net principal disbursed on loans held for investment
Proceeds from securitization
Decrease (increase) in restricted cash—special dividend escrow
Decrease in restricted cash—for securitization investors
Proceeds from sale of equipment
Purchases of premises and equipment
Net cash provided by (used for) investing activities
Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock
Proceeds from issuance of warrant
Proceeds from issuance of securitized debt
Maturities of securitized debt
Proceeds from issuance of other long-term borrowings
Maturities of other long-term borrowings
Net increase in deposits
Proceeds from acquisition of deposits
Dividend paid to Morgan Stanley
Dividends paid on common and preferred stock
Excess tax benefits related to stock-based compensation
Net cash (used for) provided by financing activities
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents, at beginning of period
Cash and cash equivalents, at end of period
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest expense
Income taxes, net of income tax refunds
Non-cash transactions:
4
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Description of Business. Discover Financial Services (“DFS” or the “Company”) is a leading credit card issuer in the United States and an electronic payment services company. In March 2009, the Company became a bank holding company under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 and a financial holding company under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act. Therefore, the Company is now subject to oversight, regulation and examination by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve”). Through its Discover Bank subsidiary, a Delaware state-chartered bank, the Company offers its customers credit cards, other consumer loans and deposit products. Through its DFS Services LLC subsidiary and its subsidiaries, the Company operates the Discover Network, the PULSE Network (“PULSE”) and Diners Club International (“Diners Club”). The Discover Network provides credit card transaction processing for Discover card-branded and third-party issued credit cards. PULSE operates an electronic funds transfer network, providing financial institutions issuing debit cards on the PULSE network with access to ATMs domestically and internationally, as well as point of sale terminals at retail locations throughout the U.S. for debit card transactions. Diners Club is a global payments network that grants rights to licensees, which are generally financial institutions, to issue Diners Club branded credit cards and/or to provide card acceptance services. The Diners Club business also offers transaction processing and marketing services to licensees globally.
The Company’s business segments are Direct Banking and Payment Services. The Direct Banking segment includes Discover card-branded credit cards issued to individuals and small businesses on the Discover Network and other consumer products and services, including personal loans, student loans, prepaid cards and other consumer lending and deposit products offered through the Company’s Discover Bank subsidiary. The Payment Services segment includes PULSE, Diners Club and the Company’s third-party issuing business, which includes credit, debit and prepaid cards issued on the Discover Network by third parties.
Basis of Presentation. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete consolidated financial statements. In the opinion of management, the financial statements reflect all adjustments which are necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the quarter. All such adjustments are of a normal, recurring nature. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the condensed consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. These estimates are based on information available as of the date of the condensed consolidated financial statements. The Company believes that the estimates used in the preparation of the condensed consolidated financial statements are reasonable. Actual results could differ from these estimates. These interim condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s 2009 audited consolidated financial statements filed with the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 2009.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820): Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements. ASU 2010-06 revises two disclosure requirements concerning fair value measurements and clarifies two others. It requires separate presentation of significant transfers into and out of Levels 1 and 2 of the fair value hierarchy and disclosure of the reasons for such transfers. It will also require the presentation of purchases, sales, issuances and settlements within Level 3 on a gross basis rather than a net basis. The amendments also clarify that disclosures should be disaggregated by class of asset or liability and that disclosures about inputs and valuation techniques should be provided for both recurring and non-recurring fair value measurements. The Company’s disclosures about fair value measurements, including the new disclosures which are applicable to the Company beginning in the current period, are presented in Note 15: Fair Value Disclosures. The disclosures concerning gross presentation of Level 3 activity are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010.
5
In December 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 132(R)-1, Employers’ Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets (codified within Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 715, Compensation-Retirement Benefits). This standard provides guidance on an employer’s disclosures about plan assets of a defined benefit pension or other postretirement plan. Required disclosures include a description of how investment allocation decisions are made, the inputs and valuation techniques used to measure the fair value of plan assets and significant concentrations of risk. The standard is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009 and will first apply to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ending November 30, 2010. The application of this guidance will only affect disclosures and therefore will not impact the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
In June 2009, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets-an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140 (“Statement No. 166”, codified within ASC Topic 860, Transfers and Servicing) and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 167,Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (“Statement No. 167”, codified within ASC Topic 810, Consolidation).
Statement No. 166 amended the accounting for transfers of financial assets. Under Statement No. 166, the trusts used in the Company’s securitization transactions are no longer exempt from consolidation. Statement No. 167 prescribes an ongoing assessment of the Company’s involvement in the activities of the trusts and the Company’s rights or obligations to receive benefits or absorb losses of the trusts that could be potentially significant in order to determine whether those variable interest entities (“VIEs”) will be required to be consolidated in the Company’s financial statements. In accordance with Statement No. 167, the Company concluded it is the primary beneficiary of the Discover Card Master Trust I (“DCMT”) and the Discover Card Execution Note Trust (“DCENT”) (the “trusts”) and accordingly, the Company began consolidating the trusts on December 1, 2009. Using the carrying amounts of the trust assets and liabilities as prescribed by Statement No. 167, the Company recorded a $21.1 billion increase in total assets, a $22.4 billion increase in total liabilities and a $1.3 billion decrease in stockholders’ equity (comprised of a $1.4 billion decrease in retained earnings offset by a $0.1 billion increase in accumulated other comprehensive income). These amounts were comprised of the following transition adjustments, which were treated as noncash activities for purposes of preparing the condensed consolidated statement of cash flows:
Consolidation of $22.3 billion of securitized loan receivables and the related debt issued from the trusts to third-party investors;
Consolidation of $0.1 billion of cash collateral accounts and the associated debt issued from the trusts;
Reclassification of $2.3 billion of held-to-maturity investment securities to loan receivables;
Reclassification of $2.3 billion of available-for-sale investment securities to loan receivables and reversal of $0.1 billion, net of tax, of related unrealized losses previously recorded in other comprehensive income;
Recording of a $2.1 billion allowance for loan losses, not previously required under GAAP, for the newly consolidated and reclassified credit card loan receivables;
Reversal of all amounts recorded in amounts due from asset securitization through (i) derecognition of the remaining $0.1 billion value of the interest-only strip receivable, net of tax, (ii) reclassification of $0.8 billion of cash collateral accounts and $0.3 billion of accumulated collections to restricted cash, (iii) reclassification of $0.2 billion to unbilled accrued interest receivable, and (iv) reclassification of $0.3 billion of billed accrued interest receivable to loan receivables; and
Recording of net deferred tax assets of $0.8 billion, largely related to establishing an allowance for loan losses on the newly consolidated and reclassified credit card loan receivables.
6
The assets of the consolidated VIEs include restricted cash and certain credit card loan receivables, which are restricted to settle the obligations of those entities and are not expected to be available to the Company or its creditors. Liabilities of the consolidated VIEs include secured borrowings for which creditors or beneficial interest holders do not have recourse to the general credit of the Company.
The Company’s statements of income for the three months and six months ended May 31, 2010 no longer reflect securitization income, but instead report interest income, net charge-offs and certain other income associated with all securitized loan receivables, and interest expense associated with debt issued from the trusts to third-party investors, in the same line items in the Company’s statement of income as non-securitized credit card loan receivables and corporate debt. Additionally, the Company no longer records initial gains on new securitization activity since securitized credit card loans no longer receive sale accounting treatment. Also, there are no gains or losses recorded on the revaluation of the interest-only strip receivable as that asset is not recognizable in a transaction accounted for as a secured borrowing. Because the Company’s securitization transactions are accounted for under the new accounting rules as secured borrowings rather than asset sales, the cash flows from these transactions are presented as cash flows from financing activities rather than as cash flows from operating or investing activities.
The Company’s statement of income for the three and six months ended May 31, 2009 and its statement of financial condition as of November 30, 2009 have not been retrospectively adjusted to reflect the amendments to ASC 810 and ASC 860. Therefore, current period results and balances will not be comparable to prior period amounts, particularly with regard to the following (and their related subtotals):
Investment securities;
Loan receivables (and the related delinquencies, charge-offs, and allowance and provision for loan losses);
Certain securitization assets recorded under prior GAAP;
Long-term borrowings;
Interest income;
Interest expense;
Other income; and
Earnings per share.
The Company’s investment securities consist of the following (dollars in thousands):
U.S. Treasury securities(1)
States and political subdivisions of states
Other securities:
Certificated retained interests in DCENT and DCMT(2)
Credit card asset-backed securities of other issuers
Asset-backed commercial paper notes
Residential mortgage-backed securities
Other debt and equity securities
Total other securities
Total investment securities
7
The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, and fair value of available-for-sale and held-to-maturity investment securities are as follows (dollars in thousands):
At May 31, 2010
Available-for-Sale Investment Securities(1)
Equity securities
Total available-for-sale investment securities
Held-to-Maturity Investment Securities(2)
U.S. Treasury securities
Other debt securities(3)
Total held-to-maturity investment securities
At November 30, 2009
Certificated retained interests in DCENT
Certificated retained interests in DCENT and DCMT
8
At May 31, 2010, the Company had 27 investments in credit card asset-backed securities of other issuers and 5 investments in state and political subdivisions of states in an unrealized loss position. The following table provides information about investment securities with aggregate gross unrealized losses and the length of time that individual investment securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position as of May 31, 2010 and November 30, 2009 (dollars in thousands):
Available-for-Sale Investment Securities
Held-to-Maturity Investment Securities
State and political subdivisions of states
During the six months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company received $400.6 million and $80.0 million of proceeds related to maturities or redemptions of investment securities, respectively. During the same periods, the Company had no sales of investment securities.
The Company records gains and losses on investment securities in other income when investments are sold, when the Company believes an investment is other than temporarily impaired prior to the disposal of the investment, or in certain other circumstances. During the three and six months ended May 31, 2010, the Company realized a $0 million and $0.2 million gain on other debt securities. During the three and six months ended May 31, 2009, the Company realized $1.0 million and $1.8 million of other than temporary impairment (“OTTI”), which was recorded entirely in earnings, substantially all of which was related to debt and equity investments classified as available for sale. As of May 31, 2010 and November 30, 2009, no OTTI has been recorded in other comprehensive income.
The Company records unrealized gains on its available-for-sale investment securities in other comprehensive income. For the six months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company recorded net unrealized gains of $3.6 million ($2.2 million after tax) and $22.6 million ($14.0 million after tax), respectively, in other comprehensive income. For the six months ended May 31, 2009, other comprehensive income included the reversal of $0.8 million of unrealized losses that had been included in accumulated other comprehensive income at the end of the previous year, but were subsequently reclassified into earnings due to recognition of OTTI, as discussed above. Additionally, the Company eliminated a net unrealized loss of $125.0 million ($78.6 million after tax) upon consolidation of its securitization trusts in connection with the adoption of Statements No. 166 and 167 on December 1, 2009.
At May 31, 2010, the Company had $4.1 million of gross unrealized losses on its held-to-maturity investment securities in states and political subdivisions of states, compared to $6.2 million of gross unrealized losses at November 30, 2009. The Company believes the unrealized loss on these investments is the result of changes in interest rates subsequent to the Company’s acquisitions of these securities and that the reduction in value is temporary. The Company does not intend to sell these investments nor does it expect to be required to sell these investments before recovery of their amortized cost bases, but rather expects to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of these securities.
9
Maturities of available-for-sale debt securities and held-to-maturity debt securities at May 31, 2010 are provided in the table below (dollars in thousands):
Available-for-sale—Amortized Cost(1)
Held-to-maturity—Amortized Cost(2)
Other debt securities
Available-for-sale—Fair Values(1)
Held-to-maturity—Fair Values(2)
10
Loan receivables consist of the following (dollars in thousands):
Credit card loans:
Discover card(1) (2)
Discover business card
Total credit card loans
Other consumer loans:
Personal loans
Federal student loans(3)(4)
Private student loans(4)
Total other consumer loans
Allowance for loan losses(2)
Student loans held for sale represent certain eligible Federal Family Education Loan Program (“FFELP”) loans existing at May 31, 2010 which the Company intends to sell to the U.S. Department of Education (“DOE”) pursuant to a Master Loan Sale Agreement for the 2009-10 Loan Purchase Program under the Ensuring Continued Access to Student Loans Act of 2008 (“ECASLA”). Under the Master Loan Sale Agreement, the loans will be purchased by the DOE at an amount which approximates their book value. The loans are expected to be sold to the DOE on or before October 15, 2010.
11
The following table provides changes in the Company’s allowance for loan losses for the three and six months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009 (dollars in thousands):
Balance at beginning of period
Addition to allowance related to securitized receivables(1)
Additions:
Deductions:
Charge-offs:
Discover card
Federal student loans
Private student loans
Total charge-offs
Recoveries:
Total recoveries
Net charge-offs
Balance at end of period
The Company calculates its allowance for loan losses by estimating probable losses separately for segments of the loan portfolio with similar risk characteristics, which generally results in segmenting the portfolio by loan product type.
For its credit card loan receivables, the Company uses a migration analysis to estimate the likelihood that a loan receivable will progress through various stages of delinquency and eventually charge off. In the first quarter 2010, the Company developed analytics which provide a better understanding of the likelihood that current accounts, or those that are not delinquent, will eventually charge off. The Company used this information in combination with the migration analysis to determine its allowance for credit card loan losses at May 31, 2010. The Company does not identify individual loans for impairment, but instead estimates its allowance for credit card loan losses on a pooled basis, which includes loans that are delinquent and/or no longer accruing interest.
Loan receivables that have been modified under troubled debt restructurings are evaluated separately from the pool of receivables that is subject to the above analysis. Credit card loan receivables modified in a troubled
12
debt restructuring are recorded at their present values with impairment measured as the difference between the loan balance and the discounted present value of expected future cash flows expected to be received. Changes in the present value are recorded to the provision for loan losses.
For its other consumer loans, the Company considers historical and forecasted losses in estimating the related allowance for loan losses. In determining the proper level of the allowance for loan losses related to both credit card and other consumer loans, the Company may also consider other factors, such as current economic conditions, recent trends in delinquencies and bankruptcy filings, account collection management, policy changes, account seasoning, loan volume and amounts, payment rates and forecasting uncertainties.
Information regarding nonaccrual, past due and restructured loan receivables is as follows (dollars in thousands):
Loans not accruing interest
Loans over 90 days delinquent and accruing interest
Restructured loans(2)
As part of certain collection strategies, the Company may place a customer’s account in a permanent workout program under which the loan may be restructured, at which time the customer’s future borrowing privileges are suspended. Therefore, the Company has no commitments to lend additional funds to customers in a permanent workout program. Such modifications are accounted for in accordance with ASC 310-40, Troubled Debt Restructuring by Creditors, under which loan impairment is measured based on the discounted present value of cash flows expected to be collected. All of the Company’s permanent workout loans, which share common risk characteristics and are evaluated collectively on an aggregated basis, had a related allowance for loan losses.
At May 31, 2010 and November 30, 2009, the Company had included $99.8 million and $28.0 million, respectively, in its allowance for loan losses for loans in its permanent workout program. Interest income on these loans is accounted for in the same manner as other accruing loans. Cash collections on these loans are allocated according to the same payment hierarchy methodology applied to loans that are not in such programs. Additional information about loans in the Company’s permanent workout program is shown below (dollars in thousands):
Average recorded investment in loans
Interest income recognized during the time within the period these loans were impaired(2)
Gross interest income that would have been recorded in accordance with the original terms(3)
13
Information regarding net charge-offs of interest and fee revenues on credit card loans is as follows (dollars in thousands):
Interest accrued subsequently charged off, net of recoveries(recorded as a reduction of interest income)
Fees accrued subsequently charged off, net of recoveries(recorded as a reduction to other income)
The Company accesses the term asset securitization market through DCMT and DCENT, which are trusts into which credit card loan receivables are transferred (or, in the case of DCENT, into which beneficial interests in DCMT are transferred) and from which beneficial interests are issued to investors.
The DCMT debt structure consists of Class A, triple-A rated certificates and Class B, single-A rated certificates held by third parties. Credit enhancement is provided by the subordinated Class B certificates, cash collateral accounts, and more subordinated Series 2009-CE certificates that are held by a wholly-owned subsidiary of Discover Bank. The DCENT debt structure consists of four classes of securities (DiscoverSeries Class A, B, C and D notes), with the most senior class generally receiving a triple-A rating. In this structure, in order to issue senior, higher rated classes of notes, it is necessary to obtain the appropriate amount of credit enhancement, generally through the issuance of junior, lower rated or more highly subordinated classes of notes. The majority of these more highly subordinated classes of notes are held by subsidiaries of Discover Bank. In addition, there is another series of certificates (Series 2009-SD) issued by DCMT which provides increased excess spread levels to all other outstanding securities of the trusts. The Series 2009-SD certificates are held by a wholly-owned subsidiary of Discover Bank. In January 2010, the Company increased the size of the Class D (2009-1) note and Series 2009-CE certificate to further support the more senior securities of the trusts. The Company was not contractually required to provide this incremental level of credit enhancement but was permitted to do so pursuant to the trusts’ governing documents.
Subsequent to November 30, 2009, the Company’s securitizations are accounted for as secured borrowings and the trusts are treated as consolidated subsidiaries of the Company under ASC 810 and ASC 860. Accordingly, beginning on December 1, 2009, all of the assets and liabilities of the trusts are included directly on the Company’s consolidated statement of financial condition. Trust receivables underlying third-party investors’ interests are recorded in credit card loan receivables—restricted for securitization investors, and the related debt issued by the trusts is reported in long-term borrowings—owed to securitization investors. Additionally, beginning on December 1, 2009, certain other of the Company’s retained interests in the assets of the trusts, principally consisting of investments in DCMT certificates and DCENT notes held by subsidiaries of Discover Bank, now constitute intercompany positions, which are eliminated in the preparation of the Company’s consolidated statement of financial condition. Trust receivables underlying the Company’s various retained interests, including the seller’s interest in trust receivables, are recorded in credit card loan receivables—restricted for securitization investors.
Upon transfer of credit card loan receivables to the trust, the receivables and certain cash flows derived from them become restricted for use in meeting obligations to the trusts’ creditors. The trusts have ownership of cash balances that also have restrictions, the amounts of which are reported in restricted cash—for securitization investors. Investment of trust cash balances is limited to investments that are permitted under the governing documents of the trusts and which have maturities no later than the related date on which funds must be made
14
available for distribution to trust investors. With the exception of the seller’s interest in trust receivables, the Company’s interests in trust assets are generally subordinate to the interests of third-party investors and, as such, may not be realized by the Company if needed to absorb deficiencies in cash flows that are allocated to the investors in the trusts’ debt. The carrying values of these restricted assets, which are presented on the Company’s statement of financial condition as relating to securitization activities, are shown in the table below (dollars in thousands):
Cash collateral accounts
Collections and interest funding accounts
Investors’ interests held by third-party investors
Investors’ interests held by wholly owned subsidiaries of Discover Bank
Seller’s interest
Loan receivables—restricted for securitization investors(1)
Allowance for loan losses(1)
Carrying value of assets of consolidated variable interest entities
The debt securities issued by the consolidated VIEs are subject to credit, payment and interest rate risks on the transferred credit card loan receivables. To protect investors, the securitization structures include certain features that could result in earlier-than-expected repayment of the securities. The primary investor protection feature relates to the availability and adequacy of cash flows in the securitized pool of receivables to meet contractual requirements. Insufficient cash flows would trigger the early repayment of the securities. This is referred to as the “economic early amortization” feature.
Investors are allocated cash flows derived from activities related to the accounts comprising the securitized pool of receivables, the amounts of which reflect finance charges billed, certain fee assessments, allocations of merchant discount and interchange, and recoveries on charged-off accounts. From these cash flows, investors are reimbursed for charge-offs occurring within the securitized pool of receivables and receive a contractual rate of return and Discover Bank is paid a servicing fee as servicer. Any cash flows remaining in excess of these requirements are reported to investors as excess spread. An excess spread rate of less than 0% for a contractually specified period, generally a three-month average, would trigger an economic early amortization event. In such an event, the Company would be required to seek immediate sources of replacement funding. Apart from the restricted assets related to securitization activities, the investors and the securitization trusts have no recourse to the Company’s other assets or credit for a shortage in cash flows.
The Company is required to maintain a contractual minimum level of receivables in the trust in excess of the face value of outstanding investors’ interests. This excess is referred to as the minimum seller’s interest requirement. The required minimum seller’s interest in the pool of trust receivables, which is included in credit card loan receivables restricted for securitization investors, is set at approximately 7% in excess of the total investors’ interests (which includes interests held by third parties as well as those certificated interests held by the Company). If the level of receivables in the trust was to fall below the required minimum, the Company would be required to add receivables from the unrestricted pool of receivables, which would increase the amount of credit card loan receivables restricted for securitization investors. If the Company could not add enough
15
receivables to satisfy the requirement, an early amortization (or repayment) of investors’ interests would be triggered.
Another feature of the Company’s securitization structure that is designed to protect investors’ interests from loss, which is applicable only to the notes issued from DCENT, is a reserve account funding requirement in which excess cash flows generated by the transferred loan receivables are held at the trust. This funding requirement is triggered when DCENT’s three-month average excess spread rate decreases to below 4.50%, with increasing funding requirements as excess spread levels decline below preset levels to 0%.
In addition to performance measures associated with the transferred credit card loan receivables, there are other events or conditions which could trigger an early amortization event. As of May 31, 2010, no economic or other early amortization events have occurred.
The tables below provide information concerning investors’ interests and related excess spreads at May 31, 2010 (dollars in thousands):
Discover Card Master Trust I
Discover Card Execution Note Trust (DiscoverSeries notes)
Total investors’ interests
Group excess spread percentage
DiscoverSeries excess spread percentage
The Company continues to own and service the accounts that generate the loan receivables held by the trusts. Discover Bank receives servicing fees from the trusts based on a percentage of the monthly investor principal balance outstanding. Although the fee income to Discover Bank offsets the fee expense to the trusts and thus is eliminated in consolidation, failure to service the transferred loan receivables in accordance with contractual requirements could lead to a termination of the servicing rights and the loss of future servicing income.
16
The following disclosures apply to securitization activities of the Company prior to December 1, 2009, when transfers of receivables to the trusts were treated as sales in accordance with prior GAAP. At November 30, 2009, the Company’s retained interests in credit card securitizations were accounted for as follows (dollars in thousands):
Available-for-sale investment securities
Held-to-maturity investment securities
Loan receivables (seller’s interest)(1)
Amounts due from asset securitization:
Cash collateral accounts(2)
Accrued interest receivable
Interest-only strip receivable
Other subordinated retained interests
Total retained interests
Retained interests classified as available-for-sale investment securities at November 30, 2009 were carried at amounts that approximated fair value with changes in the fair value estimates recorded in other comprehensive income, net of tax. Retained interests classified as held-to-maturity investment securities were carried at amortized cost. All other retained interests in credit card asset securitizations were recorded in amounts due from asset securitization at amounts that approximated fair value.
17
Key estimates and sensitivities of fair values reported at November 30, 2009 of certain retained interests to immediate 10% and 20% adverse changes in those estimates were as follows (dollars in millions):
Interest-only receivable strip (carrying amount/fair value)
Weighted average life (in months)
Weighted average payment rate (rate per month)
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change
Weighted average principal charge-offs (rate per annum)
Weighted average discount rate (rate per annum)
Cash collateral accounts (carrying amount/fair value)
Certificated retained beneficial interests reported as available-for-sale investment securities (carrying amount/fair value)
The sensitivity analyses of the interest-only strip receivable, cash collateral accounts and certificated retained beneficial interests are hypothetical and should be used with caution. Changes in fair value based on a 10% or 20% variation in an estimate generally cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in the estimate to the change in fair value may not be linear. Also, the effect of a variation in a particular estimate on the fair value of the interest-only strip receivable, specifically, is calculated independent of changes in any other estimate; in practice, changes in one factor may result in changes in another (for example, increases in market interest rates may result in lower payments and increased charge-offs), which might magnify or counteract the sensitivities. In addition, the sensitivity analyses do not consider any action that the Company may take to mitigate the impact of any adverse changes in the key estimates.
During the three and six months ended May 31, 2009, the Company recognized a net revaluation of its subordinated retained interests, principally the interest-only strip receivable, consisting of losses of $93.0 million and $191.2 million, respectively, in securitization income in the condensed consolidated statements of income. For the three and six months ended May 31, 2009, the Company securitized $750 million of receivables, which resulted in an initial gain of $1.0 million.
18
The following table summarizes certain cash flow information related to the securitized pool of loan receivables (dollars in millions):
Proceeds from third-party investors in new credit card securitizations
Proceeds from collections reinvested in previous credit card securitizations
Contractual servicing fees received
Cash flows received from retained interests
Purchases of previously transferred credit card loan receivables (securitization maturities)
The tables below present quantitative information about delinquencies and net principal charge-offs of securitized and non-securitized credit card loans for periods in which transfers of receivables to the securitization trusts were accounted for as sales (dollars in millions):
Loans Outstanding:
Managed credit card loans
Less: Securitized credit card loans
Owned credit card loans
Loans Over 30 Days Delinquent:
Average Loans:
Net Principal Charge-offs:
The Company offers its deposit products, including certificates of deposit, money market accounts, online savings accounts and Individual Retirement Account (IRA) certificates of deposit to customers through two channels: (i) through direct marketing, internet origination and affinity relationships (“direct-to-consumer deposits”); and (ii) indirectly through contractual arrangements with brokerage firms (“brokered deposits”). During the three months ended May 31, 2010, the Company acquired approximately $1 billion of deposit accounts from a third party, which were considered to be direct-to-consumer deposits. As of May 31, 2010 and
19
November 30, 2009, the Company had approximately $17.5 billion and $12.6 billion, respectively, of direct-to-consumer deposits and approximately $17.4 billion and $19.5 billion, respectively, of brokered deposits.
A summary of interest-bearing deposit accounts is as follows (dollars in thousands):
Certificates of deposit in amounts less than $100,000(1)
Certificates of deposit in amounts of $100,000(1) or greater
Savings deposits, including money market deposit accounts
Total interest-bearing deposits
Average annual interest rate
At May 31, 2010, certificates of deposit maturing during the remainder of 2010, the next four years and thereafter were as follows (dollars in thousands):
Year
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
Thereafter
20
Long-term borrowings consist of borrowings and capital leases having original maturities of one year or more. The following table provides a summary of the Company’s long-term borrowings and weighted average interest rates on balances outstanding at period end (dollars in thousands):
Interest Rate
Terms
Maturity
Discover Card Master Trust I and Discover Card Execution Note Trust
Fixed rate asset-backed securities(1)
5.10% to
5.65% fixed
Floating rate asset-backed securities(1)
Floating rate asset-backed securities and other borrowings(1)
Total Long-Term Borrowings—owed to securitization investors
Discover Financial Services (Parent Company)
Floating rate senior notes
3-month LIBOR(2)
+ 53 basis points
Fixed rate senior notes due 2017
Fixed rate senior notes due 2019
Discover Bank
Subordinated bank notes due 2019
Subordinated bank notes due 2020
Floating rate secured borrowing-Cash collateral account(3)
Floating rate secured borrowing-Student loans(4)
Capital lease obligations
Total Other Long-Term Borrowings
The Company has an unsecured credit agreement that is effective through May 2012. The agreement provides for a revolving credit commitment of up to $2.4 billion (of which the Company may borrow up to 30% and Discover Bank may borrow up to 100% of the total commitment). As of May 31, 2010, the Company had no outstanding balances due under the facility. The credit agreement provides for a commitment fee on the unused portion of the facility, which can range from 0.07% to 0.175% depending on the index debt ratings. Loans outstanding under the credit facility bear interest at a margin above the Federal Funds rate, LIBOR, the EURIBOR or the Euro Reference rate. The terms of the credit agreement include various affirmative and negative covenants, including financial covenants related to the maintenance of certain capitalization and tangible net worth levels, and certain double leverage, delinquency and Tier 1 capital to managed loans ratios. The credit agreement also includes customary events of default with corresponding
21
grace periods, including, without limitation, payment defaults, cross-defaults to other agreements evidencing indebtedness for borrowed money and bankruptcy-related defaults. The commitment may be terminated upon an event of default.
The Company also has access to committed undrawn capacity through privately placed asset-backed conduits through bilateral agreements to support the funding of its credit card loan receivables. As of May 31, 2010, the total commitment of secured credit facilities through private providers was $3.8 billion, of which $0.3 billion had been used and was included in long-term borrowings—owed to securitization investors at May 31, 2010. The scheduled maturities as of May 31, 2010 are as follows; $1.5 billion in 2010, $0 in 2011, $0.5 billion in 2012 and $1.8 billion in 2013. Borrowings outstanding under each facility bear interest at a margin above asset-backed commercial paper costs of each individual conduit provider. The terms of each agreement provide for a commitment fee to be paid on the unused capacity, and include various affirmative and negative covenants, including performance metrics and legal requirements similar to those required to issue any term securitization transaction.
On April 21, 2010, the Company completed the repurchase of all the outstanding shares of the Company’s Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A (the “Preferred Stock”) issued to the U.S. Department of the Treasury under the Capital Purchase Program of the Troubled Asset Relief Program on March 13, 2009 for $1.2 billion.
The Preferred Stock was issued at a discount to reflect the value of the warrant (the “Warrant”) to purchase 20,500,413 shares of common stock of the Company issued to the U.S. Treasury in connection with the initial sale of the Preferred Stock. As a result of the repurchase of the Preferred Stock, at the redemption date the Company accelerated the accretion of the remaining discount of $61 million. At May 31, 2010, the Warrant remained outstanding.
The Company sponsors defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans for its eligible U.S. employees. However, as of December 31, 2008, the pension plans no longer provide for the accrual of future benefits. For more information, see the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 2009.
22
Net periodic benefit (income) cost expensed by the Company included the following components (dollars in thousands):
Service cost, benefits earned during the period
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation
Expected return on plan assets
Net amortization
Net settlements and curtailments
Net periodic benefit income
Net periodic benefit cost
Income tax expense consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):
Current:
U.S. federal
U.S. state and local
International
Total
Deferred:
23
The following table reconciles the Company’s effective tax rate to the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate:
U.S. federal statutory income tax rate
U.S. state and local income taxes and other, net of U.S. federal income tax benefits
Valuation allowance—capital loss
Non-deductible compensation
Effective income tax rate
The Company is under continuous examination by the IRS and the tax authorities for various states. The tax years under examination vary by jurisdiction; for example, the current IRS examination covers 1999 through 2005. The Company regularly assesses the likelihood of additional assessments in each of the taxing jurisdictions resulting from these and subsequent years’ examinations. A reserve has been established that the Company believes is adequate in relation to the potential for additional assessments.
As part of its audit of 1999-2005, the IRS has notified the Company of certain proposed adjustments. The Company intends to utilize the IRS administrative appeal process to protest the proposed adjustments. The outcome of any appeal is not certain and the matter is in a preliminary stage, but the Company expects that any federal income taxes or related interest due will not be materially in excess of the amounts already included in its reserve.
Effective December 1, 2009, the Company adopted new accounting guidance on earnings per share, which clarifies that unvested stock-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends are participating securities and should be included in computing earnings per share (“EPS”) using the two-class method. The Company grants restricted stock units (“RSUs”) to certain employees under its stock-based compensation programs, which entitle the recipients to receive nonforfeitable dividend equivalents in the same amount and at the same time as dividends paid to all common stockholders; these unvested awards meet the definition of participating securities. Under the two-class method, all earnings (distributed and undistributed) are allocated to each class of common stock and participating securities, based on their respective rights to receive dividends. Prior period EPS amounts have been restated to conform to current period presentation, although there was no material impact on the previously reported basic or diluted EPS.
24
The following table presents the calculation of basic and diluted EPS (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts):
Numerator:
Preferred stock dividends
Preferred stock discount accretion
Net income available to common stockholders
Income allocated to participating securities
Denominator:
Weighted average common shares outstanding
Effect of dilutive common stock equivalents
Weighted average common shares outstanding and common stock equivalents
The following securities were considered anti-dilutive and therefore were excluded from the computation of diluted EPS (shares in thousands):
Unexercised stock options
The Company is subject to capital adequacy guidelines of the Federal Reserve, and Discover Bank (the “Bank”), the Company’s main banking subsidiary, is subject to various regulatory capital requirements as administered by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”). Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can result in the initiation of certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the financial position and results of the Company and the Bank. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Company and the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items, as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors.
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Company and the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (as defined in the regulations) of total risk-based capital and Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets, and of Tier 1 capital to average assets. As of May 31, 2010, the Company and the Bank met all capital adequacy requirements to which they were subject.
Under regulatory capital requirements, the Company and the Bank must maintain minimum levels of capital that are dependent upon the risk-weighted amount or average level of the financial institution’s assets, specifically (a) 8% to 10% of total risk-based capital to risk-weighted assets (“total risk-based capital ratio”),
25
(b) 4% to 6% of Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets (“Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio”) and (c) 4% to 5% of Tier 1 capital to average assets (“Tier 1 leverage ratio”). To be categorized as “well-capitalized,” the Company and the Bank must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier 1 risk-based, and Tier 1 leverage ratios as set forth in the table below. As of May 31, 2010, the Company and the Bank met the requirements for well-capitalized status and there have been no conditions or events that management believes have changed the Company’s or the Bank’s category.
The following table shows the actual capital amounts and ratios of the Company and the Bank as of May 31, 2010 and November 30, 2009 and comparisons of each to the regulatory minimum and “well-capitalized” requirements (dollars in thousands):
May 31, 2010(1):
Total risk-based capital (to risk-weighted assets)
Discover Financial Services
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)
Tier 1 capital (to average assets)
November 30, 2009:
26
Lease commitments. The Company leases various office space and equipment under capital and non-cancelable operating leases which expire at various dates through 2018. At May 31, 2010, future minimum payments on leases with original terms in excess of one year consist of the following (dollars in thousands):
Total minimum lease payments
Less: Amount representing interest
Present value of net minimum lease payments
Unused commitments to extend credit. At May 31, 2010, the Company had unused commitments to extend credit for consumer and commercial loans of approximately $168 billion. Such commitments arise primarily from agreements with customers for unused lines of credit on certain credit cards and certain other consumer loan products, provided there is no violation of conditions in the related agreement. These commitments, substantially all of which the Company can terminate at any time and which do not necessarily represent future cash requirements, are periodically reviewed based on account usage and customer creditworthiness.
Secured Borrowing Representations and Warranties. As part of the Company’s financing activities, the Company provides representations and warranties that certain assets pledged as collateral in secured borrowing arrangements conform to specified guidelines. Due diligence is performed by the Company which is intended to ensure that asset guideline qualifications are met. If the assets pledged as collateral do not meet certain conforming guidelines, the Company may be required to replace, repurchase or sell such assets. In its credit card securitization activities, the Company would replace nonconforming receivables through the allocation of excess seller’s interest or from additional transfers from the unrestricted pool of receivables. If the Company could not add enough receivables to satisfy the requirement, an early amortization (or repayment) of investors’ interests would be triggered. The maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make would be equal to the current outstanding balances of third-party investor interests, which is already entirely reflected in long-term borrowings owed to securitization investors on the Company’s statement of financial condition. The Company has not recorded any incremental contingent liability associated with its secured borrowing representations and warranties. Management believes that the probability of having to replace, repurchase or sell assets pledged as collateral under secured borrowing arrangements, including an early amortization event, is low.
Guarantees. The Company has obligations under certain guarantee arrangements, including contracts and indemnification agreements, that contingently require the Company to make payments to the guaranteed party based on changes in an underlying asset, liability or equity security of a guaranteed party, rate or index. Also included as guarantees are contracts that contingently require the Company to make payments to a guaranteed party based on another entity’s failure to perform under an agreement. The Company’s use of guarantees is disclosed below by type of guarantee.
Counterparty Settlement Guarantees. Diners Club and DFS Services LLC, on behalf of PULSE, have various counterparty exposures, which are listed below.
Merchant Guarantee. Diners Club has entered into contractual relationships with certain international merchants, which generally include travel-related businesses, for the benefit of all Diners Club licensees. The licensees hold the primary liability to settle the transactions of their customers with these merchants. However, Diners Club retains a counterparty exposure if a licensee fails to meet its financial payment obligation to one of these merchants.
27
Inter-licensee Guarantee. Diners Club retains counterparty exposure if a licensee fails to settle amounts resulting from customer transactions processed in the territory of another licensee.
ATM Guarantee. PULSE entered into contractual relationships with certain international ATM acquirers in which DFS Services LLC retains counterparty exposure if an issuer fails to fulfill its settlement obligation.
The maximum potential amount of future payments related to such contingent obligations is dependent upon the transaction volume processed between the time a counterparty defaults on its settlement and the time at which the Company disables the settlement of any further transactions for the defaulting party, which could be three days to one month depending on the type of guarantee/counterparty. The actual amount of the potential exposure cannot be quantified as the Company cannot determine whether particular counterparties will fail to meet their settlement obligations. While the Company has contractual and/or regulatory remedies to offset these counterparty settlement exposures, in the event that all licensees and/or issuers were to become unable to settle their transactions, the Company estimates its maximum potential counterparty exposures to these settlement guarantees, based on historical transaction volume of up to one month, would be as follows:
Diners Club:
Merchant guarantee (in millions)
Inter-licensee guarantee (in millions)
PULSE:
ATM guarantee (in thousands)
With regard to the counterparty settlement guarantees discussed above, the Company believes that the estimated amounts of maximum potential future payments are not representative of the Company’s actual potential loss exposure given Diners Club’s and PULSE’s insignificant historical losses from these counterparty exposures. As of May 31, 2010, the Company had not recorded any contingent liability in the condensed consolidated financial statements for these counterparty exposures, and management believes that the probability of any payments under these arrangements is low.
The Company also retains counterparty exposure for the obligations of Diners Club licensees that participate in the Citishare network, an electronic funds processing network. Through the Citishare network, Diners Club customers are able to access certain ATMs directly connected to the Citishare network. The Company’s maximum potential future payment under this counterparty exposure is limited to $15 million, subject to annual adjustment based on actual transaction experience. However, as of May 31, 2010, the Company had not recorded any contingent liability in the condensed consolidated financial statements related to this counterparty exposure, and management believes that the probability of any payments under this arrangement is low.
Merchant Chargeback Guarantees. The Company issues credit cards and owns and operates the Discover Network. The Company is contingently liable for certain transactions processed on the Discover Network in the event of a dispute between the credit card customer and a merchant. The contingent liability arises if the disputed transaction involves a merchant or merchant acquirer with whom the Discover Network has a direct relationship. If a dispute is resolved in the customer’s favor, the Discover Network will credit or refund the disputed amount to the Discover Network card issuer, who in turn credits its customer’s account. The Discover Network will then charge back the transaction to the merchant or merchant acquirer. If the Discover Network is unable to collect the amount from the merchant or merchant acquirer, it will bear the loss for the amount credited or refunded to the customer. In most instances, a payment obligation by the Discover Network is unlikely to arise because most products or services are delivered when purchased, and credits are issued by merchants on returned items in a timely fashion. However, where the product or service is not scheduled to be provided to the customer until some later date following the purchase, the likelihood of a contingent payment obligation by the Discover Network increases. The maximum potential amount of future payments related to such contingent obligations is estimated
28
to be the portion of the total Discover Network transaction volume processed to date for which timely and valid disputes may be raised under applicable law and relevant issuer and customer agreements. However, the Company believes that such amount is not representative of the Company’s actual potential loss exposure based on the Company’s historical experience. The actual amount of the potential exposure cannot be quantified as the Company cannot determine whether the current or cumulative transaction volumes may include or result in disputed transactions.
The table below summarizes certain information regarding merchant chargeback guarantees:
Losses related to merchant chargebacks (in thousands)
Aggregate transaction volume(1) (in millions)(1)
The Company has not recorded any contingent liability in the condensed consolidated financial statements related to merchant chargeback guarantees at May 31, 2010 and November 30, 2009. The Company mitigates this risk by withholding settlement from merchants or obtaining escrow deposits from certain merchant acquirers or merchants that are considered higher risk due to various factors such as time delays in the delivery of products or services. The table below provides information regarding the settlement withholdings and escrow deposits, which are recorded in interest-bearing deposit accounts and accrued expenses and other liabilities on the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of financial condition (in thousands):
Settlement withholdings and escrow deposits
The Company filed a lawsuit captioned Discover Financial Services, Inc. v. Visa USA Inc., MasterCard Inc. et al. in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on October 4, 2004. Through this lawsuit the Company sought to recover substantial damages and other appropriate relief in connection with Visa’s and MasterCard’s illegal anticompetitive practices that, among other things, foreclosed the Company from the credit and debit network services markets. The Company executed an agreement to settle the lawsuit with MasterCard and Visa for up to $2.75 billion on October 27, 2008, which became effective on November 4, 2008 upon receipt of the approval of Visa’s Class B shareholders. At the time of the Company’s 2007 spin-off from Morgan Stanley, the Company entered into an agreement with Morgan Stanley regarding the manner in which the antitrust case against Visa and MasterCard was to be pursued and settled, and how proceeds of the litigation were to be shared (the “Special Dividend Agreement”).
On October 21, 2008, Morgan Stanley filed a lawsuit against the Company in New York Supreme Court for New York County seeking a declaration that Morgan Stanley did not breach the Special Dividend Agreement, did not interfere with any of the Company’s existing or prospective agreements for resolution of the antitrust case against Visa and MasterCard, and that Morgan Stanley is entitled to receive a portion of the settlement proceeds as set forth in the Special Dividend Agreement. On November 18, 2008, the Company filed its response to Morgan Stanley’s lawsuit, which included counterclaims against Morgan Stanley for interference with the Company’s efforts to resolve the antitrust lawsuit against Visa and MasterCard and willful and material breach of the Special Dividend Agreement, which expressly provided that the Company would have sole control over the investigation, prosecution and resolution of the antitrust lawsuit.
29
Subsequent to a ruling by the New York State Court, the Company estimated that the amount that was probable it would owe to Morgan Stanley was $837.7 million as of November 30, 2009. Of this amount, $808.8 million was recorded as Special dividend—Morgan Stanley in liabilities on the statement of financial condition with an offset to retained earnings and $28.9 million of interest related to delayed payment was recorded in other expense. On February 11, 2010, the Company entered into a Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release with Morgan Stanley, in which each party released and discharged the other party from claims related to the sharing of proceeds from the antitrust suit against Visa and MasterCard. On the same day, the Company entered into a First Amendment to the Separation and Distribution Agreement dated as of June 29, 2007 (the “First Amendment”) with Morgan Stanley. The First Amendment provides that payments that Morgan Stanley receives from the Company in connection with the settlement of the antitrust litigation with Visa and MasterCard shall not exceed a total of $775 million, inclusive of any accrued and unpaid interest and fees under the agreement. In addition, on the same day, the Company paid Morgan Stanley $775 million from restricted cash held in an escrow account in complete satisfaction of its obligations under the Special Dividend Agreement.
Upon payment of the $775 million on February 11, 2010, the Company reversed the $28.9 million that had been recorded in other expense in the fourth quarter 2009 and recorded a reduction to the liability attributable to the special dividend from $808.8 million to $775 million with an offsetting increase to retained earnings.
15. Fair Value Disclosures
The Company is required to disclose the fair value of financial instruments for which it is practical to estimate fair value. To obtain fair values, observable market prices are used if available. In some instances, observable market prices are not readily available and fair value is determined using present value or other techniques appropriate for a particular financial instrument. These techniques involve some degree of judgment and, as a result, are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Company would realize in a current market exchange. The use of different assumptions or estimation techniques may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.
30
The following table provides the estimated fair values of financial instruments (dollars in thousands):
Financial Assets
Restricted cash—for securitization investors(1)
Available-for-sale(1)
Held-to-maturity(1)
Net loan receivables(1)
Amounts due from asset securitization(1)
Financial Liabilities
Long-term borrowings—owed to securitization investors(1)
Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities Held at May 31, 2010. Below are descriptions of the techniques used to estimate the fair value of financial instruments on the Company’s statement of financial condition as of May 31, 2010.
Cash and cash equivalents. The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents approximates fair value due to the low level of risk these assets present to the Company as well as the relatively liquid nature of these assets, particularly given their short maturities.
Restricted cash. The carrying value of restricted cash approximates fair value due to the relatively liquid nature of these assets, particularly given the short maturities of the assets in which the restricted cash is invested.
Other short-term investments. The carrying value of other short-term investments approximates fair value due to the low level of risk these assets present to the Company as well as the relatively liquid nature of these assets, particularly given their maturities of less than one year.
Available-for-sale investment securities. Investment securities classified as available-for-sale consist of credit card asset-backed securities issued by other institutions and asset-backed commercial paper notes, the fair value estimate techniques of which are discussed below.
Held-to-maturity investment securities. Held-to-maturity investment securities are generally valued using the estimated fair values based on quoted market prices for the same or similar securities.
Net loan receivables. The Company’s loan receivables include credit card and installment loans to consumers and credit card loans to businesses. To estimate the fair value of loan receivables, loans are aggregated into pools of similar loan types, characteristics and expected repayment terms. The fair values of the loans are estimated by discounting expected future cash flows using a rate at which similar loans could be made under current market conditions.
Deposits. The carrying values of money market deposits, non-interest bearing deposits, interest-bearing demand deposits and savings deposits approximate their fair values due to the liquid nature of these deposits. For
31
time deposits for which readily available market rates do not exist, fair values are estimated by discounting expected future cash flows using market rates currently offered for deposits with similar remaining maturities.
Long-term borrowings—owed to securitization investors. Fair values of long-term borrowings owed to securitization investors are determined utilizing quoted market prices of the same or similar transactions.
Other long-term borrowings. Fair values of other long-term borrowings are determined utilizing current observable market prices for those transactions, if available. If there are no observable market transactions, then fair values are determined by discounting cash flows of future interest accruals at market rates currently offered for borrowings with similar remaining maturities and repricing terms.
Fair Value of Assets Held at November 30, 2009. Below are descriptions of the techniques used to calculate the fair value of financial instruments on the Company’s statements of financial condition as of November 30, 2009 which were subsequently derecognized, reclassified or eliminated in consolidation as a result of the adoption of Statements No. 166 and 167 on December 1, 2009.
Available-for-sale investment securities. Fair value of certain certificated subordinated interests issued by DCENT that were acquired by a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company were estimated utilizing discounted cash flow analyses, where estimated contractual principal and interest cash flows were discounted at current market rates for the same or comparable transactions, if available. If there was little or no market activity, discount rates were derived from indicative pricing observed in the most recent active market for such instruments, adjusted for changes reflective of incremental credit risk, liquidity risk, or both.
Held-to-maturity investment securities. The estimated fair values of certain certificated subordinated interests issued by DCENT and DCMT were derived utilizing a discounted cash flow analysis, where estimated contractual principal and interest cash flows were discounted at market rates for comparable transactions, if available. If there was little or no market activity on which to conclude an appropriate discount rate for similarly rated instruments, the discount rate is interpolated from recent pricing observed on similar asset classes, adjusted for incremental credit risk, liquidity risk, or both, to reflect, for example, the risk related to the lower rating on the instrument being valued than that which was observed. A substantial portion of these investment securities were zero coupon certificated retained interests in DCENT and DCMT, the aggregate carrying value, or amortized cost, exceeded fair value.
Amounts due from asset securitization. Carrying values of the portion of amounts due from asset securitization that were short term in nature approximated their fair values. Fair values of the remaining assets recorded in amounts due from asset securitization reflected the present value of estimated future cash flows utilizing management’s best estimate of key assumptions with regard to credit card loan receivable performance and interest rate environment projections.
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis. ASC 820 defines fair value, establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between valuations that are based on observable inputs from those based on unobservable inputs, and requires certain disclosures about those measurements. The table below presents information about the Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at May 31, 2010, and indicates the level within the fair value hierarchy with which each of those items is associated. In general, fair values determined by Level 1 inputs are defined as those that utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access. Fair values determined by Level 2 inputs are those that utilize inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active or inactive markets, quoted prices for the identical assets in an inactive market, and inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, such as interest rates and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals. Fair values determined by Level 3 inputs are those based on unobservable inputs, and include situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability being valued. In instances in which the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in
32
its entirety is classified is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.
Disclosures concerning assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are as follows (dollars in thousands):
The Company considers relevant and observable market prices in its fair value calculations, evaluating the frequency of transactions, the size of the bid-ask spread and the significance of adjustments made when considering transactions involving similar assets or liabilities to assess the relevance of those observed prices. If relevant and observable prices are available, the fair values of the related assets or liabilities would be classified as Level 2. If relevant and observable prices are not available, other valuation techniques would be used and the fair values of the financial instruments would be classified as Level 3. The Company may utilize both observable and unobservable inputs in determining the fair values of financial instruments classified within the Level 3 category. The level to which an asset or liability is classified is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. If the fair value of an asset or liability is measured based on observable inputs as well as unobservable inputs which contributed significantly to the determination of fair value, the asset or liability would be classified in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
At May 31, 2010, amounts reported in credit card asset-backed securities issued by other institutions reflected senior-rated Class A securities having a par value of $821 million and more junior-rated Class B and Class C securities with par values of $50 million and $42 million, respectively. The Class A securities had a weighted-average coupon of 2.32% and a weighted-average remaining maturity of 14 months, the Class B, 0.66% and 24 months, respectively, and the Class C, 0.80% and 19 months, respectively. The underlying loans for these securities are predominantly prime general-purpose credit card loan receivables. The Company utilizes an external pricing source for the reported fair value estimates of these securities. The expected cash flow models used by the pricing service utilize observable market data to the extent available and other valuation inputs such as benchmark yields, reported trades, broker quotes, issuer spreads, bids and offers, the priority of which may vary based on availability of information. We further assess the reasonableness of the price quotations received from the external pricing source by reference to indicative pricing from another independent, nationally recognized provider of capital markets information.
At May 31, 2010, the amounts reported in asset-backed commercial paper notes are mortgage-backed commercial paper notes of one issuer, Golden Key U.S. LLC (“Golden Key”). The notes are currently in default, and as such are not rated by a nationally recognized credit rating agency. The market value assessments for the notes are based on an estimate of an exit price for the collateral securities held by Golden Key, which consist of
33
U.S. residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”). In making the market value assessments, an RMBS modeling system is used that forecasts expected cash flows to be recovered from each of the collateral securities. These assessments consider structural features of the MBS securities, including any related credit enhancement, underlying mortgage type, demographic data such as geographic exposure, the impact of government intervention programs, and other market information.
The following tables provide changes in the Company’s Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis. Net transfers into and/or out of Level 3 are presented using beginning of the period fair values. The Company had no significant transfers between Levels 1, 2 or 3 during the three months ended May 31, 2010, the first effective period for the new disclosure requirements prescribed by ASU No. 2010-06.
Changes in Level 3 Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
For the Three Months Ended
May 31, 2010
For the Six Months Ended
Certificated retained interest in DCENT
34
May 31, 2009
The following are the amounts recognized in earnings and Other Comprehensive Income related to assets categorized as Level 3 during the respective periods (in thousands):
Interest income—interest accretion
Other income—gain (loss) on investment securities
Securitization income—net revaluation of retained interests
Amount recorded in earnings
Unrealized gains (losses) recorded in other comprehensive income, pre-tax
Total realized and unrealized gains (losses)
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis. The Company also has assets that under certain conditions are subject to measurement at fair value on a non-recurring basis. These assets include those associated with acquired businesses, including goodwill and other intangible assets. For these assets, measurement at fair value in periods subsequent to their initial recognition is applicable if one or more is determined to be impaired. During the six months ended May 31, 2010, the Company had no impairments related to these assets.
As of May 31, 2010, the Company had not made any fair value elections with respect to any of its eligible assets and liabilities as permitted under ASC 825-10-25.
The Company’s business activities are managed in two segments: Direct Banking and Payment Services.
Direct Banking. The Direct Banking segment includes Discover card-branded credit cards issued to individuals and small businesses on the Discover Network and other consumer products and services, including personal loans, student loans, prepaid cards and other consumer lending and deposit products offered through the Company’s Discover Bank subsidiary.
35
Payment Services. The Payment Services segment includes PULSE, an automated teller machine, debit and electronic funds transfer network; Diners Club, a global payments network; and the Company’s third-party issuing business, which includes credit, debit and prepaid cards issued on the Discover Network by third parties.
The business segment reporting provided to and used by the Company’s chief operating decision maker is prepared using the following principles and allocation conventions:
Prior to adoption of Statements 166 and 167, segment information was presented on a managed basis because management considered the performance of the entire managed loan portfolio in managing the business. A managed basis presentation, which is a non-GAAP presentation, involved reporting securitized loans with the Company’s owned loans and reporting the earnings on securitized loans in the same manner as the owned loans instead of as securitization income. Although similar, a managed basis presentation is not the same as presenting a full consolidation of the trusts, and therefore, certain information may not be comparable between current and prior periods, particularly related to net interest income, provision for loan losses and other income. Subsequent to the consolidation of securitized assets and liabilities in connection with the adoption of Statements No. 166 and 167, there is no distinction between securitized and non-securitized assets on a GAAP basis. See Note 2: Change in Accounting Principle for more information.
Other accounting policies applied to the operating segments are consistent with the accounting policies described in Note 2: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to the audited consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 2009.
Corporate overhead is not allocated between segments; all corporate overhead is included in the Direct Banking segment.
Through its operation of the Discover Network, the Direct Banking segment incurs fixed marketing, servicing and infrastructure costs that are not specifically allocated among the operating segments.
The assets of the Company are not allocated among the operating segments in the information reviewed by the Company’s chief operating decision maker.
Income taxes are not specifically allocated among the operating segments in the information reviewed by the Company’s chief operating decision maker.
36
The following tables present segment data on a GAAP basis for the three and six months ended May 31, 2010 and on a managed basis with a reconciliation to a GAAP presentation for the three and six months ended May 31, 2009 (dollars in thousands):
Interest income
Other income(2)
37
On July 7, 2010, the Company repurchased the warrant to purchase 20,500,413 shares of its common stock that it issued to the U.S. Treasury in connection with the issuance of its preferred stock under the Capital Purchase Program. The Company repurchased the warrant from the U.S. Treasury for $172 million.
The Company did not have any other subsequent events that would require recognition or disclosure in the financial statements and footnotes as of and for the three months ended May 31, 2010.
38
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this quarterly report. This quarterly report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements, which speak to our expected business and financial performance, among other matters, contain words such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “aim,” “will,” “may,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “likely,” and similar expressions. Such statements are based upon the current beliefs and expectations of our management and are subject to significant risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this quarterly report, and there is no undertaking to update or revise them as more information becomes available.
The following factors, among others, could cause actual results to differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements: changes in economic variables, such as the availability of consumer credit, the housing market, energy costs, the number and size of personal bankruptcy filings, the rate of unemployment and the levels of consumer confidence and consumer debt, and investor sentiment; the impact of current, pending and future legislation, regulation and regulatory and legal actions, including new laws and rules limiting or modifying certain credit card practices, new laws and rules affecting securitizations, new laws and rules related to financial regulatory reform, and bank holding company regulations and supervisory guidance; the restrictions on our operations resulting from financing transactions; the actions and initiatives of current and potential competitors; our ability to successfully achieve card acceptance across our networks and maintain relationships with network participants; our ability to manage our credit risk, market risk, liquidity risk, operational risk, legal and compliance risk, and strategic risk; the availability and cost of funding and capital; access to deposit, securitization, equity, debt and credit markets; the impact of rating agency actions; the level and volatility of equity prices, commodity prices and interest rates, currency values, investments, other market fluctuations and other market indices; losses in our investment portfolio; our ability to increase or sustain Discover card usage or attract new customers; our ability to attract new merchants and maintain relationships with current merchants; the effect of political, economic and market conditions, geopolitical events and unforeseen or catastrophic events; fraudulent activities or material security breaches of key systems; our ability to introduce new products and services; our ability to sustain our investment in new technology and manage our relationships with third-party vendors; our ability to collect amounts for disputed transactions from merchants and merchant acquirers; our ability to attract and retain employees; our ability to protect our reputation and our intellectual property; difficulty financing or integrating new businesses, products or technologies; and new lawsuits, investigations or similar matters or unanticipated developments related to current matters. In addition, we routinely evaluate and may pursue acquisitions of or investments in businesses, products, technologies, loan portfolios or deposits, which may involve payment in cash or our debt or equity securities, and which could cause actual results to differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements.
Additional factors that could cause our results to differ materially from those described below can be found in this section in this quarterly report and in “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 2009, filed with the SEC and available at the SEC’s internet site (http://www.sec.gov).
Introduction and Overview
Discover Financial Services is a leading credit card issuer in the United States and an electronic payment services company. Through our Discover Bank subsidiary, we offer our customers credit cards, other consumer loans and deposit products. Through our DFS Services LLC subsidiary and its subsidiaries, we operate the Discover Network, the PULSE Network (“PULSE”) and Diners Club International (“Diners Club”). The Discover Network provides credit card transaction processing for Discover card-branded and third-party issued credit cards. PULSE operates an electronic funds transfer network, providing financial institutions issuing debit cards on the PULSE Network with access to ATMs domestically and internationally, as well as point of sale
39
terminals at retail locations throughout the U.S. for debit card transactions. Diners Club is a global payments network that grants rights to licensees, which are generally financial institutions, to issue Diners Club branded credit cards and/or to provide card acceptance services. Our Diners Club business also offers transaction processing and marketing services to licensees globally. Our fiscal year ends on November 30 of each year.
Our primary revenues consist of interest income earned on loan receivables and fees earned from customers, merchants and issuers. The primary expenses required to operate our business include funding costs (interest expense), loan loss provisions, customer rewards, and expenses incurred to grow, manage and service our loan receivables and networks. Our business activities are funded primarily through the raising of consumer deposits, securitization of loan receivables and the issuance of both secured and unsecured debt.
Change in Accounting Principle Related to Off-Balance Sheet Securitizations
Beginning with the first quarter 2010, we have included the trusts used in our securitization activities in our consolidated financial results in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140(“Statement No. 166”) (codified under the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Section 860, Transfers and Servicing) and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretations No. 46(R) (“Statement No. 167”) (codified under ASC Section 810, Consolidation), which were effective for us at the beginning of our current fiscal year, December 1, 2009.
Under Statement No. 166, the trusts used in our securitization transactions are no longer exempt from consolidation. Statement No. 167 prescribes an ongoing assessment of our involvement in the activities of the trusts and our rights or obligations to receive benefits or absorb losses of the trusts that could be potentially significant in order to determine whether those entities will be required to be consolidated on our financial statements. Based on our assessment, we concluded that we are the primary beneficiary of the Discover Card Master Trust I (“DCMT”) and the Discover Card Execution Note Trust (“DCENT”) (the “trusts”) and accordingly, we began consolidating the trusts on December 1, 2009. Using the carrying amounts of the trust assets and liabilities as prescribed by Statement No. 167, we recorded a $21.1 billion increase in total assets, a $22.4 billion increase in total liabilities and a $1.3 billion decrease in stockholders’ equity (comprised of a $1.4 billion decrease in retained earnings offset by an increase of $0.1 billion in accumulated other comprehensive income). The significant adjustments to our statement of financial condition upon adoption of Statements No. 166 and 167 are outlined below:
Reclassification of $4.6 billion of certificated retained interests classified as investment securities to loan receivables;
Derecognition of the remaining $0.1 billion value of the interest-only strip receivable, net of tax, recorded in amounts due from asset securitization and reclassification of the remaining $1.6 billion of amounts due from asset securitization to restricted cash, loan receivables and other assets; and
Beginning with the first quarter 2010, our results of operations no longer reflect securitization income, but instead report interest income, net charge-offs and certain other income associated with all securitized loan receivables and interest expense associated with debt issued from the trusts to third-party investors in the same line items in our results of operations as non-securitized credit card loan receivables and corporate debt. Additionally, we no longer record initial gains on new securitization activity since securitized credit card loans
40
no longer receive sale accounting treatment. Also, there are no gains or losses on the revaluation of the interest-only strip receivable as that asset is not recognizable in a transaction accounted for as a secured borrowing. Because our securitization transactions are being accounted for under the new accounting rules as secured borrowings rather than asset sales, the cash flows from these transactions are presented as cash flows from financing activities rather than as cash flows from operating or investing activities. Notwithstanding this accounting treatment, our securitizations are structured to legally isolate the receivables from Discover Bank, and we would not expect to be able to access the assets of our securitization trusts, even in insolvency, receivership or conservatorship proceedings. We do, however, continue to have the rights associated with our retained interests in the assets of these trusts.
Reconciliations of GAAP to As Adjusted Data
We did not retrospectively adopt Statements No. 166 and 167 and, therefore, the condensed consolidated financial statements presented in this quarterly report as of and for the three and six months ended May 31, 2010 reflect the new accounting requirements, but the historical statement of financial condition as of November 30, 2009 and statement of income and statement of cash flows for the three and six months ended May 31, 2009 continue to reflect the accounting applicable prior to the adoption of the new accounting requirements.
To enable the reader to better understand our financial information by reflecting period-over-period data on a consistent basis, this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations presents our financial information as of and for the three and six months ended May 31, 2010 as compared to adjusted results of operations data for the three and six months ended May 31, 2009 and adjusted credit card loan receivables data as of November 30, 2009. Management reviews the as adjusted financial information in its decision-making and in evaluating the business. Therefore, management believes the adjusted financial information is useful to investors as it aligns with management’s view of the business. The as adjusted amounts:
show how our financial data would have been presented if the trusts used in our securitization activities were consolidated into our financial statements for such historical periods; and
remove the impact of income received in connection with the settlement of our antitrust litigation with Visa and MasterCard for such historical periods.
The impacts of Statements No. 166 and 167 on our earnings summary, detail of other income and Direct Banking segment information are reflected in two steps in the reconciliation of GAAP to as adjusted data in the tables below. First, we made securitization adjustments to reverse the effect of loan securitization by recharacterizing securitization income to report interest income, expense, provision for loan losses, discount and interchange revenue and loan fee income in the same line items as non-securitized loans. These adjustments result in a “managed basis” presentation, which we have historically included in our quarterly and annual reports to reflect the way in which our senior management evaluated our business performance and allocated resources.
Then, additional adjustments were made to reflect results as if the trusts used in our securitization activities had been fully consolidated in our historical results. These adjustments include:
Elimination of interest income and interest expense related to certificated retained interests classified as investment securities and associated intercompany debt;
An adjustment to the provision for loan losses for the change in securitized loan receivables;
Elimination of the revaluation gains or losses associated with the interest-only strip receivable, which was derecognized upon adoption; and
An adjustment to reflect the income tax effects related to these adjustments.
The impacts of Statements No. 166 and 167 on our effective tax rate, loan receivables and average balance sheet information are reflected in one step, rather than two, in the reconciliation of GAAP to as adjusted data in the tables below as there is no meaningful difference between such information on a historical managed basis as compared to an as adjusted basis.
41
Earnings Summary and Reconciliation
Income (loss) before income tax expense
Income tax expense (benefit)
Net income (loss)
42
Other Income and Reconciliation
Loss on investment securities
Effective Tax Rate and Reconciliation
GAAP
Adjustments
As Adjusted
43
Direct Banking Segment Summary and Reconciliation
44
Loan Receivables Data and Reconciliation
Loan receivables
Adjustments for Statement No. 167
Allowance for loan losses (beginning of period)
Charge-offs
Recoveries
Allowance for loan losses (end of period)
Net charge-offs %
Delinquency rate (Over 30 Days)
Delinquency rate (Over 90 Days)
45
Total Discover card loans
Credit Card Loans
Total Loans
Total loans
Net loans
Loans over 30 days delinquent
46
Average Balance Sheet Reconciliation
Average restricted cash
Average investment securities
Average credit card loan receivables
Average total loan receivables
Average other interest-earning assets
Average total interest-earning assets
Average allowance for loan losses
Average other assets (non-interest bearing)
Average total assets
Average securitized borrowings
Average total borrowings
Average total interest-bearing liabilities
47
(dollars in thousands,
except where noted)
Average other liabilities and stockholders’ equity (non-interest earning)
Average total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
Net interest margin
Interest rate spread
Amortization of balance transfer fees in interest income on credit card loans
(dollars in millions)
48
Highlights
Net income was $258 million in the second quarter 2010 as compared to an as adjusted net loss of $132 million in the second quarter 2009. During the second quarter 2010, we recorded $61 million of accelerated accretion related to our redemption of $1.2 billion of preferred stock that we previously issued to the U.S. Treasury under the Capital Purchase Program. Although this $61 million did not impact net income, together with preferred dividends and scheduled accretion, it reduced diluted earnings per share by $0.13 in the second quarter 2010.
Discover card sales volume increased 6% in the second quarter 2010 as compared to 2009, a continuation of the year-over-year growth seen since the fourth quarter 2009. At May 31, 2010, our total loan receivables were $50 billion, a 2% decline from the as adjusted balance at May 31, 2009, as higher sales volumes and growth in our student loan portfolio were more than offset by charge-offs and lower balance transfer activity.
In the second quarter 2010, our net charge-off rate was 7.97% and our over 30 days delinquency rate was 4.52%, decreases of 54 basis points and 53 basis points, respectively, as compared to the first quarter 2010. We reduced our allowance for loan losses by $277 million in the second quarter 2010.
Transaction volumes and pretax income in our Payments Services segment increased in the second quarter 2010 as compared to the second quarter 2009. Dollar volumes increased 1% as compared to the second quarter 2009 as higher Diners Club and third-party issuing volumes offset a slight decline in PULSE volumes. However, the number of transactions processed on the PULSE network increased 6% in the second quarter 2010 as compared to the second quarter 2009. Pretax income for the Payment Services segment was $36 million in the second quarter 2010, an increase of $10 million as compared to the second quarter 2009, due to higher margin transaction volume and lower expenses.
Direct-to-consumer deposits grew to $17.5 billion at May 31, 2010, an increase of $2.7 billion as compared to February 28, 2010, which was due in part to our acquisition of approximately $1 billion of deposit accounts from a third party during the quarter.
Outlook
During the second quarter 2010, we experienced improvement in our credit performance and continued year-over-year growth in sales volumes. Net charge-offs decreased in the second quarter 2010, and the 30-day delinquency rate decreased in the first and second quarters of 2010, in each case on a sequential quarter basis. We believe that credit performance may continue to improve into the second half of 2010.
We expect that credit card loan receivables may increase modestly during the remainder of 2010. However, student loan receivables, which represented 6% of our total loan receivables at the end of the second quarter, are expected to decline during the second half of 2010. Recent legislation requires all federal student loans to be made directly by the federal government starting July 2010, although we will continue to offer private student loans. In addition, we expect to sell up to $1.5 billion of federal student loans to the U.S. Department of Education on or before October 15, 2010, as further discussed in “—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Funding Sources—ECASLA.”
Interest yield on credit card loans for the second quarter 2010 increased to 12.93% from 12.70% for the first quarter 2010 largely as the result of a decline in finance charge charge-offs. We expect that the interest yield on credit card loans will decline during the remainder of 2010 as the impact of the implementation of the CARD Act provisions will more than offset any further benefit in 2010 from lower finance charge charge-offs. The impact of the implementation of the CARD Act provisions that become effective in August 2010 will reduce late and other penalty fee revenues.
In the second half of 2010, we will continue to emphasize growth in direct-to-consumer deposits, which represented approximately 33% of our total funding at May 31, 2010. At May 31, 2010, our funding mix also included approximately 33% of brokered deposits, 28% of asset-backed securities and 6% of other funding. We
49
anticipate that the percentage of funding we obtain from direct-to-consumer deposits will continue to rise during the remainder of the year. In the second half of 2010, we will have significantly lower maturities than we had in the first half of 2010 and, therefore, we anticipate that the level of our liquidity investment portfolio will also decline.
We plan to continue making investments to build our brand and global acceptance network for credit, debit, and cash access transactions. We expect that our strategic network alliances with key global card networks such as Korea’s BC Card, Japan’s JCB and China UnionPay, along with continued development of merchant acquirer relationships, will provide a foundation to drive global acceptance and volumes.
Recent Development
On April 21, 2010, we repurchased all of the outstanding shares of our preferred stock that we issued to the U.S. Treasury under the Capital Purchase Program on March 13, 2009 for $1.2 billion. On July 7, 2010, we repurchased the warrant to purchase 20,500,413 shares of our common stock that we issued to the U.S. Treasury in connection with the issuance of our preferred stock. We repurchased the warrant from the U.S. Treasury for $172 million.
Legislative and Regulatory Developments
Legislation Addressing Credit Card Practices
In May 2009, the CARD Act was enacted. The CARD Act made numerous changes to the Truth in Lending Act, affecting the marketing, underwriting, pricing, billing and other aspects of the consumer credit card business. Several provisions of the CARD Act became effective in August 2009, but most of the requirements became effective in February 2010 and others will become effective in August 2010. The CARD Act and its implementing regulations:
Prohibit interest rate increases on outstanding balances except under limited circumstances;
Prohibit interest rate increases on new balances during the first year an account is opened except under limited circumstances;
Require allocation of payments in excess of the required minimum payment to balances with the highest annual percentage rate (“APR”) before balances with a lower APR (for accounts with different APRs on different balances);
Restrict imposition of a default APR on existing balances unless an account is 60 days past due and require that the increased APR resulting from a default be reduced if payments are timely made for six months;
Generally require 45 days’ advance notice be provided prior to increasing any APR (as permitted by the CARD Act) or other significant changes to account terms. Except for certain changes, the notice must include a statement of the cardholder’s right to cancel the account prior to the effective date of the change;
Prohibit the use of the two-cycle average daily balance method of calculating interest and prohibit the assessment of interest on any portion of a balance that is repaid within the grace period;
Require penalty fees (e.g., late fees, returned payment fees and over-limit fees) to be “reasonable” and “proportional” to the total costs incurred by the card issuer or fall within the safe harbor of $25 for the first violation or $35 for subsequent violations of the same type within the next six billing cycles. In no event can the penalty fee exceed the amount associated with the violation;
Prohibit card issuers from imposing over-limit fees unless the cardholder has expressly opted-in to the issuer authorizing such over-limit transactions, and imposes other limits on such fees;
Require card issuers to review accounts at least every six months when an APR has been increased on or after January 1, 2009 to determine whether the APR should be reduced;
50
Prohibit issuance of a credit card to a consumer under the age of 21 unless there is a co-signer over the age of 21 who has a means to repay or the individual under the age of 21 has an independent means to repay; and
Require new billing statement disclosures, such as the length of time and cost of paying down the account balances if only minimum payments are made.
A number of the CARD Act’s requirements reflected our existing practices and did not or will not require modifications of policies or procedures. The CARD Act’s restrictions on risk management practices that have been commonplace in the industry have caused us to manage risk through more restrictive underwriting and credit line management, reduce promotional offers and increase annual percentage rates. Certain provisions of the CARD Act, such as those addressing limitations on interest rate increases, late and over-limit fees and payment allocation, have required and will require us to make additional fundamental changes to our current business practices and systems. For example, we are no longer charging over-limit fees, imposing fees for payments made over the telephone, or changing interest rates on existing balances when a customer’s payments are late.
We are making changes that the CARD Act requires to be implemented in a relatively short timeframe. We are continuing to evaluate appropriate modifications to products, pricing, marketing strategies and other business practices that will be in compliance with the law, will be attractive to consumers and will provide a good return for our stockholders. The full impact of the CARD Act on us is unknown at this time as we are currently evaluating the final rule issued in June 2010 by the Federal Reserve to implement the requirements that take effect in August 2010, which includes limitations on penalty fees and requires re-evaluation of APR increases. The restrictions on late and other penalty fees will reduce loan fee revenues and may impact our ability to deter late payments. The requirement to review APR increases since January 1, 2009 will reduce our interest income. The full impact of the CARD Act ultimately depends upon successful implementation of our strategies, consumer behavior, and the actions of our competitors, in addition to further Federal Reserve interpretation of the provisions.
The CARD Act also requires the Federal Reserve and the Government Accountability Office to conduct various studies, including a review of interchange fees, reasons for credit limit reductions and rate increases, “small business” cards, and credit card terms and disclosures. Based on the results of these studies, new requirements that negatively impact us may be introduced as future legislation or regulation.
Financial Regulatory Reform
The U.S. Congress is considering extensive changes to the laws regulating financial services firms. On June 30, 2010, the House approved the “Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act” (the “Reform Act”). The Senate is expected to vote on the Reform Act in mid-July and the President is expected to sign it into law shortly after final approval by the Senate. The Reform Act, as well as other legislative and regulatory changes, could have a significant impact on us by, for example, requiring us to change our business practices, requiring us to establish more stringent capital, liquidity and leverage ratio requirements, limiting our ability to pursue business opportunities, imposing additional costs on us, limiting fees we can charge for services, impacting the value of our assets, or otherwise adversely affecting our businesses.
The comprehensive Reform Act addresses risks to the economy and the payments system, especially those posed by large systemically significant financial firms (including bank holding companies with assets of at least $50 billion, which would include us). It does so through a variety of measures, including increased capital and liquidity requirements, limits on leverage, enhanced supervisory authority (including authority to limit activities and growth), regulatory oversight of nonbanking entities, resolution authority for failed financial firms (and the establishment of a mechanism to recover such costs through assessments on large financial firms), enhanced regulation of derivatives, restrictions on executive compensation, and oversight of credit rating agencies.
51
If enacted, the Reform Act will likely result in increased scrutiny and oversight of consumer financial services and products, primarily through the establishment of a new independent “Consumer Financial Protection Bureau” within the Federal Reserve. The Bureau would have broad rulemaking and enforcement authority over providers of credit, savings and payment services and products. The Bureau would be directed to prevent “unfair, deceptive or abusive practices” and ensure that all consumers have access to markets for consumer financial products and services, and that such markets are fair, transparent and competitive. The Bureau would have rulemaking and interpretive authority under existing and future consumer financial services laws and supervisory, examination and enforcement authority over institutions subject to its jurisdiction, which would include us. State officials would be authorized to enforce consumer protection rules issued by the Bureau.
In addition, the Reform Act authorizes the Federal Reserve to regulate interchange fees paid to banks on debit card transactions to ensure that they are “reasonable and proportional” to the cost of processing individual transactions, and prohibits debit card networks and issuers from requiring transactions to be processed on a single payment network. The Reform Act also prohibits credit/debit network rules that restrict merchants’ ability to offer discounts to customers in order to encourage them to use a particular form of payment, as long as such discounts do not discriminate against issuers or networks, and from setting minimum (or, with respect to government agencies and educational institutions, maximum) transaction amounts for credit cards. The impact of these provisions on the debit card market and the PULSE network is uncertain at this time and will depend upon Federal Reserve implementing regulations, the actions of our competitors and the behavior of other marketplace participants.
In addition, the Reform Act contains several provisions that could increase the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) deposit insurance premiums paid by Discover Bank, including a change in the assessment base for federal deposit insurance from the amount of insured deposits to consolidated assets less tangible equity and an increase in the minimum reserve ratio of the Deposit Insurance Fund from 1.15% to 1.35% of insured deposits (with the FDIC having until September 30, 2020 to meet the new minimum through assessments on insured depository institutions with assets of $10 billion or more). Various assessments and fees are also authorized in the legislation and others could be authorized in the future.
The Reform Act would also effect a number of significant changes relating to the asset-backed securities and structured finance markets, including a requirement that regulators jointly adopt regulations requiring securitizers to retain, subject to certain exemptions and exceptions, at least 5% unhedged credit risk on securitized exposures. The Reform Act would also require the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) to impose asset-level registration statement disclosure requirements if the data is necessary for investors to independently perform due diligence.
Many provisions of the Reform Act require the adoption of rules to implement. In addition, the Reform Act mandates multiple studies, which could result in additional legislative or regulatory action. The effect of the Reform Act and its implementing regulations on our business and operations could be significant. In addition, we may be required to invest significant management time and resources to address the various provisions of the Reform Act and the numerous regulations that are required to be issued under it. The Reform Act, any related legislation and any implementing regulations could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Other Credit Card and Student Loan Legislation
Congress may also consider other legislation affecting our business, such as a ceiling on the rate of interest that can be charged on credit cards. However, other legislative priorities and a shortened election-year Congressional session reduce the likelihood of enactment of such bills.
We currently offer both federal and private student loans. In March 2010, the President signed into law the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act (“HCERA”). HCERA requires all new federal student loans to be
52
made directly by the federal government starting July 2010, rather than by private institutions through the Federal Family Education Loan Program. Because HCERA allows financial institutions to continue offering private student loans, we do not currently expect HCERA to have a significant impact on our private student loan program. The Reform Act referenced above would provide for a study of private education loans and lenders, and would create a private education loan Ombudsman with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. The study could lead to additional legislation or regulation in the future.
Bankruptcy Legislation
A bill referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee would disallow claims in Chapter 7 bankruptcy based on “high cost” consumer debt and exclude consumers with such debt from the bankruptcy “means test.” The means test requires debtors who can afford to repay a portion of their debts through Chapter 13 repayment plan do so, rather than discharge all indebtedness under Chapter 7. The proposed legislation, if enacted, could increase the percentage of bankruptcy filers who obtain full debt discharges to the detriment of all unsecured lenders, and could result in increased charge-offs of our loan receivables. It is unclear whether this legislation will be enacted by Congress.
Congress also continues to consider legislation to allow bankruptcy courts to restructure first mortgage loans (e.g., by reducing the loan amount to the value of the collateral, a process referred to as “cramdown”). Such a change would likely increase the number of individuals who file for bankruptcy, which would adversely impact all creditors including us. While the House of Representatives approved a cramdown bill last year, the Senate did not. Prospects for the bill’s enactment this year do not appear to be strong.
Compensation Developments
In June 2010, the Federal Reserve, together with the FDIC and the other banking agencies, issued final guidance designed to ensure that incentive compensation practices of financial organizations take into account risk and are consistent with safety and soundness. The Federal Reserve recently conducted a special horizontal review of compensation practices at more than twenty large complex banking organizations, including us, with the expectation that incentive compensation practices appropriately balance risk and financial results and avoid creating incentives for employees to take imprudent risks.
The Reform Act described above under “—Financial Regulatory Reform” would impose additional disclosures and restrictions on compensation paid by financial institutions.
FDIC and SEC Rules Regarding Securitizations
While we have capacity to issue new asset-backed securities from our securitization trusts, there has been uncertainty in the securitization market recently as a result of revised accounting standards and related guidance from the FDIC. The ability of issuers of asset-backed securities to obtain necessary credit ratings for their issuances has been based, in part, on the FDIC’s safe-harbor rule entitled Treatment by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Conservator or Receiver of Financial Assets Transferred by an Insured Depository Institution in Connection with a Securitization or Participation, which provides that the FDIC, as conservator or receiver, will not, using its power to disaffirm or repudiate contracts, seek to reclaim or recover assets transferred in connection with a securitization, or recharacterize them as assets of the insured depository institution, provided such transfer meets the conditions for sale accounting treatment under GAAP. Pursuant to FASB guidance for transfers of financial assets, effective for us on December 1, 2009, certain transfers of assets to special purpose entities (including Discover Bank’s transfer of assets to the Discover Card Master Trust) no longer qualify for sale accounting treatment. Consequently, there has been uncertainty in the securitization market as to how the FDIC will treat assets transferred into securitization vehicles under the new FASB guidance. This uncertainty had made it difficult to obtain the necessary credit ratings for the issuances of asset-backed securities.
53
In November 2009, the FDIC issued an interim final rule that preserves the safe-harbor treatment applicable under the existing FDIC rule for beneficial interests in securitizations of revolving assets issued on or prior to March 31, 2010 so long as those securitizations would have complied with the original safe harbor under generally accepted accounting principles in effect prior to November 15, 2009. In March 2010, the FDIC published a final rule that preserves the safe-harbor treatment applicable under the existing FDIC rules for beneficial interests in securitizations of revolving assets issued on or prior to September 30, 2010 so long as those securitizations would have complied with the original safe harbor under generally accepted accounting principles in effect prior to November 15, 2009. Issuances after this date are subject to the final determination of the FDIC regarding the safe-harbor standard, the proposed framework of which is described in a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking issued by the FDIC in May 2010. Under such framework, availability of the new safe harbor would be conditioned on insured depository institution sponsors retaining 5% of each credit tranche of a securitization sold to investors (or a “representative sample of the securitized assets equal to not less than 5% of the principal amount of the financial assets at transfer”) on an unhedged basis and complying with numerous other requirements relating to capital structure, disclosure, documentation and recordkeeping, compensation, origination and other matters.
In April 2010, the SEC proposed revised rules for asset-backed securities offerings that, if adopted, would substantially change the disclosure, reporting and offering process for public and private offerings of asset-backed securities, including those offered under our securitization program. The proposed rules, if adopted in their current form, would, among other things, impose as a condition for the shelf registration of asset-backed securities a requirement that the sponsor of the asset-backed securities offering hold a minimum of 5% of the nominal amount of each of the tranches sold or transferred to investors (or, in the case of revolving master trusts, an originator’s interest of a minimum of 5% of the nominal amount of the securitization exposures) and not hedge those holdings. Issuers of publicly offered asset-backed securities would be required to disclose more information regarding the underlying assets and to file a computer program that demonstrates the effect of the transaction’s waterfall of distributions. In addition, the proposals would alter the safe-harbor standards for the private placement of asset-backed securities to impose informational requirements similar to those that would apply to registered public offerings of such securities.
As discussed above under “—Financial Regulatory Reform,” the Reform Act also contains numerous provisions with respect to securitizations. It remains to be seen whether and how the proposed FDIC and SEC rules with respect to securitizations will be reconciled with those called for in the Reform Act.
We are currently assessing the impact that these proposed rules and those that may be promulgated under the Reform Act would have on our securitization program. The form that these rules will ultimately take is uncertain at this time, but they may impact Discover Bank’s ability and/or desire to issue asset-backed securities in the future.
FDIC Initiatives Regarding Assessments
Market developments have significantly depleted the insurance fund of the FDIC and reduced the ratio of reserves to insured deposits. As a result, we may be required to pay significantly increased premiums or additional special assessments. In 2009, we paid $15.8 million for a special industry-wide FDIC deposit insurance assessment. The FDIC required banks to prepay their FDIC insurance premiums for the years 2010 through 2012. On December 30, 2009, we prepaid $185.5 million, which includes all of our quarterly assessments, typically paid one quarter in arrears, for the calendar quarters ending December 31, 2009 through December 31, 2012.
Additionally, in January 2010, the FDIC issued an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking seeking comment on ways that the FDIC’s risk-based deposit insurance assessment system could be changed to account for the risks posed by certain employee incentive compensation programs. The proposed rulemaking was subject to a public comment period, which has expired, but no final rule has been issued.
54
In May 2010, the FDIC issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking proposing to revise the deposit assessment system applicable to large institutions, which would include Discover Bank, to better align assessment rates with the risks of such institutions. New initial and total base assessment rates would be effective January 1, 2011. The proposal includes a larger assessment on deposits that are treated under applicable banking regulations as brokered deposits to the extent that brokered deposits exceed 10% of the total deposits of a bank, which would adversely affect the assessment paid by Discover Bank, assuming its current deposit level and composition. The proposed rulemaking was subject to a public comment period, which expired in early July 2010, but no final rule has been issued.
As discussed above under “—Financial Regulatory Reform,” the Reform Act will, if enacted, likely increase the amounts that we will have to pay to the FDIC for deposit insurance.
Regulatory Initiatives Related to Capital and Liquidity
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision released two consultative documents, which propose significant changes to bank capital and liquidity regulation, in December 2009. The capital proposals would, among other things, (i) re-emphasize that common equity is the predominant component of Tier 1 capital by adding a minimum common equity to risk-weighted assets ratio and requiring that goodwill, general intangibles and certain other items that currently must be deducted from Tier 1 capital instead be deducted from common equity as a component of Tier 1 capital, (ii) disqualify from Tier 1 status “innovative” and certain other capital instruments, including instruments (such as U.S.-style trust preferred securities and cumulative perpetual preferred stock) that effectively pay cumulative dividends, are dated or contain interest rate step-ups, (iii) strengthen the risk coverage of the capital framework, particularly with respect to counterparty credit risk exposures arising from derivatives, repos and securities financing activities, (iv) impose as an international standard a non-risk adjusted leverage ratio that could be more onerous than the one currently in effect in the United States, (v) implement measures to build up capital buffers in good times that can be drawn down in periods of stress, and (vi) require that an investment by a bank in the capital instruments of other unconsolidated banks, financial institutions or insurance companies be deducted from the same form of capital of the investing bank.
The capital proposals do not specify the percentage requirements for the new ratio of common equity to risk-weighted assets. In addition, they leave open the possibility that the Basel Committee will recommend changes to the minimum Tier 1 and total capital ratios, which currently are 4% and 8%, respectively.
The liquidity proposals have three main elements (i) a “liquidity coverage ratio” designed to ensure that a bank maintains an adequate level of unencumbered high-quality assets sufficient to meet the bank’s liquidity needs over a 30-day time horizon under an acute liquidity stress scenario, (ii) a “net stable funding ratio” designed to promote more medium and long-term funding of the assets and activities of banks over a one-year time horizon, and (iii) a set of monitoring tools that the Basel Committee indicates should be considered as the minimum types of information that banks should report to supervisors.
The comment period for the Basel Committee proposals has expired. The Basel Committee was scheduled to release a comprehensive set of proposals by December 31, 2010, with implementation of final provisions by December 31, 2012, but such schedule could be modified. Implementation of any final provisions in the United States will require implementing regulations and guidelines by the United States banking regulators, which could differ from the final provisions adopted by the Basel Committee.
Independently, the U.S. Treasury issued a policy statement titled Principles for Reforming the U.S. and International Regulatory Capital Framework for Banking Firms in September 2009 setting forth core principles intended to address many of the same substantive items as the Basel Committee capital proposals and specifically calling for increased capital requirements for financial institutions, and “substantially heightened” capital requirements for large financial institutions.
55
The Reform Act also includes provisions related to increased capital requirements and oversight, such as enhanced authority to limit activities and growth. See “—Financial Regulatory Reform” above. Such provisions would establish minimum leverage and risk-based capital requirements on a consolidated basis for all depository institution holding companies and insured depository institutions that cannot be less than the minimum currently in effect for depository institutions.
We are not able to predict at this time the content of capital and liquidity guidelines or regulations that may be adopted by regulatory agencies having authority over us and our subsidiaries or the impact that any changes in regulation would have on us. However, if new regulation requires us or our banking subsidiaries to maintain more capital, with common equity as a more predominant component, or manage the configuration of our assets and liabilities in order to comply with formulaic liquidity requirements, such regulation could significantly impact our return on equity, financial condition, operations, capital position and ability to pursue business opportunities.
* * *
The remaining discussion provides a summary of our results of operations for the three and six months ended May 31, 2010 compared to our results of operations for the three and six months ended May 31, 2009 as adjusted. It also provides information about our loan receivables as of May 31, 2010 as compared to November 30, 2009 as adjusted and May 31, 2009 as adjusted. For a reconciliation of GAAP to as adjusted financial data, see “—Reconciliation of GAAP to As Adjusted Data.”
Segments
We manage our business activities in two segments: Direct Banking and Payment Services. In compiling the segment results that follow, our Direct Banking segment bears all overhead costs that are not specifically associated with a particular segment and all costs associated with Discover Network marketing, servicing and infrastructure, with the exception of an allocation of direct and incremental costs driven by our Payment Services segment.
Direct Banking. Our Direct Banking segment includes Discover card-branded credit cards issued to individuals and small businesses that are accepted on the Discover Network and other consumer products and services, including personal loans, student loans, prepaid cards and other consumer lending and deposit products offered through our Discover Bank subsidiary.
Payment Services. Our Payment Services segment includes the PULSE Network, an automated teller machine, debit and electronic funds transfer network; Diners Club, a global payments network; and our third-party issuing business, which includes credit, debit and prepaid cards issued on the Discover Network by third parties.
56
The following table presents segment data (dollars in thousands):
Direct Banking(1)
Payment Services
Total income (loss) before income tax expense
The following table presents information on transaction volume (amounts in thousands):
Network Transaction Volume
PULSE Network
Third-Party Issuers
Diners Club
Total Payment Services
Discover Network—Proprietary(1)
Total Volume
Transactions Processed on Networks
Discover Network
Credit Card Volume
Discover Card Volume(2)
Discover Card Sales Volume(3)
57
Direct Banking
Our Direct Banking segment reported pretax income of $386 million and $178 million for the three and six months ended May 31, 2010, respectively, as compared to an as adjusted pretax loss of $185 million and $527 million for the three and six months ended May 31, 2009, respectively. The improvement in our pretax income for both periods was driven primarily by lower provision for loan losses and lower operating expenses, partially offset by a decline in net interest income and other income. Provision for loan losses decreased in both periods due to sustained improvement in credit performance over the first two quarters of 2010 as compared to 2009 as adjusted. For a more detailed discussion on provision for loan losses, see “—Loan Quality—Provision and Allowance for Loan Losses.” Other expense decreased in both periods reflecting the impact of cost containment initiatives. Additionally, the first quarter of 2010 benefited from a $29 million expense reversal related to the payment to Morgan Stanley under an amendment to the special dividend agreement, while the second quarter 2009 included a $20 million restructuring charge related to the reduction in force. Net interest income decreased for the three and six months ended May 31, 2010 compared to the three and six months ended May 31, 2009 as adjusted, largely due to a lower average level of loan receivables as well as a decline in the net yield on loan receivables. The net yield decreased from the prior year as adjusted due to an increase in lower rate student loan balances and higher funding costs, partially offset by a reduction in promotional rate credit card balances, higher interest rates on standard balances and lower interest charge-offs. Other income decreased in both periods from the prior year as adjusted primarily due to the discontinuance of overlimit fees on consumer credit card loans beginning in February 2010, partially offset by higher discount and interchange revenue resulting from higher sales volume.
Loan receivables totaled $50 billion at May 31, 2010, which was down from $51 billion at May 31, 2009 as adjusted, as a decline in credit card loans was partially offset by growth in both student and personal loans. The decline in credit card loans reflects lower balance transfer activity and higher charge-offs, partially offset by higher sales volume. Discover card sales volume was up in both the first and second quarters 2010 as compared to 2009 reflecting a general increase in consumer spending and higher gas prices.
At May 31, 2010, our over 30-days delinquency rate was 4.52% as compared to 5.08% at May 31, 2009 as adjusted, which is reflective of improved credit performance. Although credit conditions have improved during 2010, the levels of consumer bankruptcies and unemployment remain elevated as compared to 2009 levels, thus, the net charge-off rate rose to 7.97% and 8.24% for the three and six months ended May 31, 2010, respectively, up 18 and 110 basis points, respectively, from the three and six months ended May 31, 2009 as adjusted.
Our Payment Services segment reported pretax income of $36 million and $73 million for the three and six months ended May 31, 2010, respectively, which was 36% and 32% higher than it was for the three and six months ended May 31, 2009, respectively, due to higher revenues and lower expenses. Higher revenues in both periods reflected an increase in the number of transactions and higher margin volume on the PULSE network. Revenues also rose because of a lower level of incentive payments and higher Diners Club revenues. Lower expenses in both periods were primarily due to transaction processing cost reduction initiatives.
Transaction volume for the three and six months ended May 31, 2010 was $37 billion and $73 billion, respectively, an increase of 1% compared to both periods in 2009. For the three and six months ended May 31, 2010, higher transaction volume was driven by higher third-party issuer and Diners Club volumes, as compared to the three and six months ended May 31, 2009, partially offset by a slight decline in PULSE volume. However, the number of transactions processed on the PULSE Network from both new and existing clients increased by 6% and 5% for the three and six months ended May 31, 2010, respectively, as compared to 2009.
Critical Accounting Estimates
In preparing our condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP, management must make judgments and use estimates and assumptions about the effects of matters that are uncertain. For estimates
58
that involve a high degree of judgment and subjectivity, it is possible that different estimates could reasonably be derived for the same period. For estimates that are particularly sensitive to changes in economic or market conditions, significant changes to the estimated amount from period to period are also possible. Management believes the current assumptions and other considerations used to estimate amounts reflected in our condensed consolidated financial statements are appropriate. However, if actual experience differs from the assumptions and other considerations used in estimating amounts in our consolidated financial statements, the resulting changes could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations and, in certain cases, could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition. Management has identified the estimates related to our allowance for loan losses, the accrual of credit card customer rewards cost, the evaluation of goodwill and other nonamortizable intangible assets for potential impairment and the accrual of income taxes as critical accounting estimates.
These critical accounting estimates are discussed in greater detail in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 2009. That discussion can be found within “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” under the heading “Critical Accounting Estimates.” In the first quarter 2010, management enhanced its ability to estimate loan loss emergence, which results in the allowance for loan losses having approximately 12 months loss coverage. For additional information, see “—Loan Quality—Provision and Allowance for Loan Losses.” Excluding the elimination of estimates related to assets that were derecognized or reclassified upon adoption of Statements No. 166 and 167 and the change in the estimate related to our allowance for loan losses, there have not been any material changes in our critical accounting estimates from those discussed in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 2009.
Earnings Summary
The following table outlines changes in our condensed consolidated statements of income for the periods presented (dollars in thousands):
Net (loss) income
59
Net Interest Income
The tables that follow this section have been provided to supplement the discussion below and provide further analysis of net interest income, net interest margin and the impact of rate and volume changes on net interest income.
Net interest income represents the difference between interest income earned on our interest-earning assets and the interest expense incurred to finance those assets. Net interest margin represents interest income, net of interest expense, as a percentage of total interest-earning assets on an annualized basis. Our interest-earning assets consist of: (i) loan receivables, (ii) our liquidity investment portfolio, which includes amounts on deposit with the Federal Reserve, highly rated certificates of deposit, and triple-A rated government mutual funds, (iii) restricted cash and (iv) investment securities. Our interest-bearing liabilities consist primarily of deposits, both brokered and direct-to-consumer, and long-term borrowings, including securitized debt. Net interest income is influenced by the following:
The level and composition of loan receivables, including the proportion of credit card loans to other consumer loans, as well as the proportion of loan receivables bearing interest at promotional rates as compared to standard rates;
The credit performance of our loans, particularly with regard to charge-offs of finance charges, which reduce interest income;
The terms of long-term borrowings and certificates of deposit upon initial offering, including maturity and interest rate;
The level and composition of other interest-bearing assets and liabilities, including our liquidity investment portfolio; and
Changes in the interest rate environment, including the levels of interest rates and the relationship between interest rate indices, such as the prime rate, the federal funds rate and LIBOR.
Credit card interest income declined in both the three and six months ended May 31, 2010, as compared to the same periods ended May 31, 2009 as adjusted, largely due to a lower average level of credit card loan receivables. The level of average credit card loan receivables declined from prior year periods as adjusted because of reduced balance transfer activity and higher charge-offs, partially offset by higher sales volume. However, the unfavorable impact of the declining credit card loan receivables on interest income was partially offset by a higher interest rate earned on credit card loan receivables, which was driven by reduced promotional rate balances and higher interest rates on standard balances. Additionally, in the second quarter 2010, a lower level of finance charge-offs positively impacted net yield on credit card loan receivables.
Other loan receivables consist primarily of personal and student loans. In 2010, interest income on other loan receivables increased as compared to 2009 as a result of the increase in personal and student loan receivables outstanding, but was partially offset by a decline in the yield on such loans. The decline in the yield on other loan receivables was driven by the increase in student loans, which bear a lower interest rate than personal loans.
For the three and six months ended May 31, 2010, interest income on cash and cash equivalents declined as compared to the same periods in 2009. This is attributable to lower interest rates earned, partially offset by higher levels of liquidity. The lower interest rate environment had a favorable impact on cost of funds, particularly with regard to its impact on new deposit issuances. However, these benefits of lower interest rates on interest expense were largely offset by higher levels of deposit funding and higher interest rates on debt issued during second quarter of 2010.
60
Average Balance Sheet Analysis
Interest-earning assets:
Restricted cash
Loan receivables(2):
Credit card(3)
Other(4)
Total interest-earning assets
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing deposits:
Time deposits(5)
Money market deposits
Other interest-bearing deposits
Borrowings:
Securitized borrowings
Total borrowings
Total interest-bearing liabilities
Other liabilities and stockholders’ equity
Net interest margin(6)
Interest rate spread(7)
61
62
Rate/Volume Variance Analysis(1)
Increase (decrease) due to changes in:
Credit cards
Time deposits
Loan Quality
63
Provision and Allowance for Loan Losses
Provision for loan losses is the expense related to maintaining the allowance for loan losses at a level management believes is adequate to absorb the estimated probable losses in the loan portfolio at each period end date. Factors that influence the provision for loan losses include:
The impact of general economic conditions on the consumer, including unemployment levels, bankruptcy trends and interest rate movements;
Changes in consumer spending and payment behaviors;
Changes in our loan portfolio, including the overall mix of accounts, products and loan balances within the portfolio;
The level and direction of historical and anticipated loan delinquencies and charge-offs;
The credit quality of the loan portfolio, which reflects, among other factors, our credit granting practices and the effectiveness of our collection efforts; and
Regulatory changes or new regulatory guidance.
In calculating the allowance for loan losses, we estimate probable losses separately for segments of the loan portfolio that have similar risk characteristics, such as credit card and other consumer loans. For our credit card loans, we use a migration analysis to determine the likelihood that a loan receivable will progress through various stages of delinquency and eventually charge off. In the first quarter 2010, we developed analytics which provide us with a better understanding of the likelihood that non-delinquent accounts will eventually charge-off, thus broadening the identification of loss emergence. We used this information in combination with the migration analysis to determine our allowance for loan losses, which increased $305 million in the first quarter 2010 as compared to the allowance at November 30, 2009 as adjusted. After the first quarter 2010, we expect that the allowance for loan losses will rise or fall based on deterioration or improvements in delinquency rates and credit conditions, respectively, as well as changes in the level of outstanding loan receivables. In the second quarter 2010, as credit conditions improved and delinquency rates fell, we reduced our allowance for loan losses by $277 million.
For the three and six months ended May 31, 2010, the provision for loan losses decreased $578 million and $668 million, or 44% and 24% respectively, as compared to the three and six months ended May 31, 2009 as adjusted. This decrease was primarily attributable to the additions to the allowance for loan losses we had in both the first and second quarters of 2009 as adjusted because of then deteriorating credit conditions. Since that time, we have experienced improved credit performance. As a result, in the second quarter 2010, we reduced our allowance for loan losses; however, the allowance in the first half of 2010 increased $28 million as the impact of improved credit conditions was offset by the adjustment to the allowance for loan loss estimate to account for our broadened identification of loss emergence.
For our other consumer loans, we consider historical and forecasted losses in estimating the related allowance for loan losses. At May 31, 2010, the level of the allowance related to other consumer loans decreased $6 million as compared to November 30, 2009 largely due to a decline in the personal loan reserve rate.
64
The following table provides changes in our allowance for loan losses (dollars in thousands):
Balance at beginning of period, as adjusted
65
The following table presents a breakdown of the allowance for loan losses (dollars in thousands):
Total allowance for loan losses
Net Charge-offs
Our net charge-offs include the principal amount of losses charged off less principal recoveries and exclude charged-off interest and fees, recoveries of interest and fees and fraud losses. Charged-off and recovered interest and fees are recorded in interest and loan fee income for loan receivables while fraud losses are recorded in other expense. Credit card loan receivables are charged off at the end of the month during which an account becomes 180 days contractually past due. Closed-end consumer loan receivables are charged off at the end of the month during which an account becomes 120 days contractually past due, except for student loans that are guaranteed by the federal government. Generally, customer bankruptcies and probate accounts are charged off at the end of the month 60 days following the receipt of notification of the bankruptcy or death but not later than the 180-day or 120-day contractual time frame.
The following table presents amounts and rates of net charge-offs of loan receivables (dollars in thousands):
Other consumer loans
Total net charge-offs
In the second quarter 2010, the amount of net charge-offs on credit card loans decreased slightly from the second quarter 2009 as adjusted. However, the net charge-off rate for the second quarter 2010 rose to 8.56%, up from 7.99% for the second quarter 2009 as adjusted, largely as a result of the lower average level of credit card loans. For the six months ended May 31, 2010, the amount and rate of net charge-offs on credit card loans increased from the prior year as adjusted because of a higher level of bankruptcy and contractual charge-offs in the first quarter 2010 as compared to the first quarter 2009 as adjusted.
For the three and six months ended May 31, 2010, charge-offs relating to other consumer loans increased as compared to the three and six months ended May 31, 2009, due to the seasoning of the personal loan portfolio.
66
However, in both periods, the net charge-off rate on other consumer loans declined as compared to the same periods in 2009 because of the increase in the level of student loans, which have not yet entered into repayment and, thus, have minimal levels of net charge-offs.
Delinquencies
Delinquencies are an indicator of credit quality at a point in time. Loan balances are considered delinquent when contractual payments on the loan become 30 days past due. Credit card and closed-end consumer loan receivables are placed on non-accrual status upon receipt of notification of the bankruptcy or death of a customer, suspected fraudulent activity on an account, as part of certain collection management processes, and other instances in which management feels collectability is not assured. In some cases of suspected fraudulent activity, loan receivables may resume accruing interest upon completion of the fraud investigation.
The following table presents the amounts and delinquency rates of loan receivables over 30 days past due, loan receivables over 90 days delinquent and accruing interest and loan receivables that are not accruing interest, regardless of delinquency (dollars in thousands):
The delinquency rates of loans over 30 days delinquent and loans over 90 days delinquent and accruing interest decreased 79 basis points and 31 basis points, respectively, at May 31, 2010, as compared to November 30, 2009 as adjusted. The decrease in both measures is due to better credit trends and enhanced collection management and underwriting processes.
Modified and Restructured Loans
We hold various credit card loans for which the terms have been modified, including some that are accounted for as troubled debt restructurings. Our modified credit card loans include loans for which temporary hardship concessions have been granted and loans in permanent workout programs. Eligibility, frequency, duration and offer type for both of these programs are offered in compliance with stated regulatory guidelines.
Temporary hardship concessions primarily consist of a reduced minimum payment and an interest rate reduction, both lasting for a period no longer than twelve months. These short term concessions do not include the forgiveness of unpaid principal, but may involve the reversal of certain unpaid interest or fee assessments. At the end of the concession period, loan terms revert to standard rates. These arrangements are automatically terminated if the customer makes two consecutive late payments, at which time their account reverts back to its original terms. In assessing the appropriate allowance for loan loss, these loans are included in the general pool of credit cards with the allowance determined under the contingent loss model of ASC 450-20, Loss Contingencies (guidance formerly contained in FASB Statement No. 5). We do not consider these loans in the troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”) pool. If we applied accounting under ASC 310-40, Troubled Debt Restructurings by Creditors (guidance formerly contained in FASB Statement No. 114), to loans in this program, there would not be a material difference in the allowance. Loans for which temporary hardship concessions were granted comprised less than 1% of our total credit card loans at May 31, 2010 and November 30, 2009.
In contrast to temporary hardship concessions, our permanent workout programs entail more significant and permanent concessions including changing the structure of the loan to a fixed payment loan with a maturity no
67
longer than 60 months. The concessions associated with a permanent workout also include a significant reduction in interest rate and possible waivers of unpaid interest and fees. We account for permanent workout loans as TDRs and, as a result, we measure impairment of these loans based on the discounted present value of cash flows expected to be received on them. Loans in permanent workout programs comprised less than 1% of our total credit card loans at May 31, 2010 and November 30, 2009.
We also participate with consumer credit counseling agency (“CCCA”) programs in an effort to assist customers to proactively manage their credit card balances. The vast majority of loans entering CCCA programs are not delinquent at the time of enrollment, and our charge-off rate on these loans is comparable or less than the rate on our overall credit card receivables portfolio. These loans continue to meet original minimum payment terms and do not normally include waiver of unpaid principal, interest or fees. In assessing the appropriate allowance for loan loss, these loans are included in the general pool of credit card loans with the allowance determined under the contingent loss model. We do not consider these loans in the TDR pool. If we applied TDR accounting to loans in this program, there would not be a material difference in the allowance. Credit card loans modified under CCCA programs comprised approximately 1.7% of our total credit card loans at May 31, 2010 and November 30, 2009.
Other Income
The following table presents the components of other income (dollars in thousands):
Discount and interchange revenue(2)
Gain (loss) on investments
Total other income was relatively flat for the three and six months ended May 31, 2010 compared to the three and six months ended May 31, 2009 as adjusted, as higher revenues from discount and interchange and transaction processing were offset by lower loan fees and merchant fees.
Discount and interchange revenue includes discount revenue and acquirer interchange net of interchange paid to third-party issuers and is further reduced by the cost of rewards programs offered to our customers. We had higher sales volume in the first and second quarters of 2010, which contributed to the increase in discount and interchange revenue from both the first and second quarters 2009 as adjusted. Transaction processing revenue also rose in the same periods in 2010 as compared to 2009, due to higher PULSE revenues, reflecting an increase in the number of transactions, including higher margin volume, and lower incentive payments in 2010.
Loan fee income consists primarily of fees on credit card loans and includes late, over-limit, cash advance, pay-by-phone and other miscellaneous fees. However, effective February 2010, we no longer charge over-limit
68
or pay-by-phone fees on consumer credit card loans, which contributed to the decline in loan fee income for the first and second quarters of 2010 as compared to 2009 as adjusted. As we continue to seek to grow merchant acceptance, the number of merchants working with us through merchant acquirers has increased, which causes our direct fees from merchants to decline. Additionally, lower revenue from fewer referrals of declined applications to third-party issuers and lower gains on sales of merchant portfolios resulted in a decrease in other income for both the three and six months ended May 31, 2010, as compared to the three and six months ended May 31, 2009 as adjusted.
Other Expense
The following table represents the components of other expense for the periods presented (dollars in thousands):
Information processing and Communications
In the second quarter 2010, we continued to benefit from the cost containment initiatives undertaken in 2009, and thus total other expense continued to decrease in the first half of 2010 as compared to 2009. These cost containment initiatives led to lower headcount, reduced marketing efforts aimed at potential new customers, and negotiations to reduce costs related to ongoing information processing and communications contracts. As a result of the reduction in headcount in 2009, we incurred severance costs and a $20 million restructuring charge, which caused second quarter 2009 expenses related to employee compensation and benefits and other expense, respectively, to be higher than the second quarter 2010. In the first half of 2010, and particularly in the second quarter 2010, we increased our advertising and global expansion initiatives, which have offset some of the benefits from the previously mentioned cost containment initiatives. In addition to these ongoing efforts, the six months ended May 31, 2010 also contained a nonrecurring benefit related to the reversal of $29 million that had been recorded in other expense in the fourth quarter 2009 related to the payment to Morgan Stanley under an amendment to the special dividend agreement (see Note 14: Litigation in condensed consolidated financial statements).
Income Tax Expense
For the three and six months ended May 31, 2010, we had income tax expense of $164 million and $97 million, respectively, compared to an income tax benefit for the three and six months ended May 31, 2009 as adjusted of $26 million and $143 million, respectively, as a result of shifting from an as adjusted pretax loss position in 2009 to pretax income in 2010. The income tax benefit for both periods of 2009 as adjusted was partially offset by the impact of recording a valuation allowance on a tax benefit arising from the sale of the Goldfish business in 2008 that we no longer believed was realizable, as well as non-deductible stock-based compensation expense recorded in March 2009. As a result, our effective tax rate for the three and six months ended May 31, 2009 as adjusted was 16.3% and 30.3%, respectively.
69
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We seek to maintain diversified funding sources and a strong liquidity profile in order to fund our business and service our maturing obligations. In addition, we seek to achieve an appropriate maturity profile, to utilize a cost-effective mix of both long-term and short-term funding sources and to ensure the composition of our funding sources provides appropriate diversification. Our primary funding sources include deposits, sourced directly or through brokers, term asset-backed securitizations, asset-backed conduit financing and long-term borrowings.
Funding Sources
Deposits. Since 2009, deposits have become our largest source of funding. We offer deposit products, including certificates of deposit, money market accounts, online savings accounts and Individual Retirement Account (“IRA”) certificates of deposit, to customers through two channels: (i) through direct marketing, internet origination and affinity relationships (“direct-to-consumer deposits”); and (ii) indirectly through contractual arrangements with brokerage firms (“brokered deposits”).
In 2010, we continued to grow our direct-to-consumer deposits program, which became our single largest source of funding in the second quarter 2010 with $17.5 billion of such deposits at May 31, 2010. Since November 30, 2009, direct-to-consumer deposits have grown $5.0 billion, or 40%, which includes approximately $1 billion of deposit accounts acquired in March 2010. At May 31, 2010, we had $17.4 billion of brokered deposits, which decreased $2.1 billion, or 11%, since November 30, 2009. Maturities of our certificates of deposit range from one month to ten years, with a weighted average maturity of 22 months at May 31, 2010.
The following table summarizes deposits by maturity as of May 31, 2010 (dollars in thousands):
Securitization Financing. We use the securitization of credit card receivables as an additional source of funding. We access the asset-backed securitization market using the Discover Card Master Trust I (“DCMT”) and the Discover Card Execution Note Trust (“DCENT”), through which we issue asset-backed securities both publicly and through privately placed asset-backed conduit facilities, which may be fully or partially undrawn at closing.
The DCMT structure utilizes Class A and Class B certificates held by third parties, with credit enhancement provided by the subordinated Class B certificates, cash collateral account loans and the more subordinated Series 2009-CE. DCENT consists of four classes of securities (Class A, B, C and D), with credit enhancement provided by the subordinated classes of notes. Both DCMT and DCENT are further enhanced by Series 2009-SD through its provisions to reallocate principal cash flows, thereby enhancing the excess spread, discussed below, of both trusts.
70
The securitization structures include certain features designed to protect investors. The primary feature relates to the availability and adequacy of cash flows in the securitized pool of receivables to meet contractual requirements, the insufficiency of which triggers early repayment of the securities. We refer to this as “economic early amortization,” which is based on excess spread levels. Excess spread is the amount by which income received by a trust during a collection period, including interest collections, fees and interchange, as well as the amount of certain principal collections available to be reallocated from Series 2009-SD exceeds the fees and expenses of the trust during such collection period, including interest expense, servicing fees and charged-off receivables. In the event of an economic early amortization, which would occur if the excess spread falls below 0% for a contractually specified period, generally a three-month rolling average, we would be required to repay the affected outstanding securitized borrowings over a period of a few months. An early amortization event would negatively impact our liquidity, and require us to rely on alternative funding sources, which may or may not be available at the time. As of May 31, 2010, no economic early amortization events have occurred.
Another feature of our securitization structure, which is applicable only to the notes issued from DCENT, is a reserve account funding requirement in which excess cash flows generated by the transferred loan receivables are held at the trust. This funding requirement is triggered when DCENT’s three-month average excess spread rate decreases to below 4.50%, with increasing funding requirements as excess spread levels decline below preset levels to 0%. The reserve account funding requirement has been triggered only once, in August 2009, and the amount was released from the trust to us in the following month. See Note 5: Credit Card Securitization Activities for additional information regarding the structures of DCMT and DCENT, and for tables providing information concerning investors’ interests and related excess spreads at May 31, 2010.
At May 31, 2010, we had $14.8 billion of outstanding public asset-backed securities, $0.3 billion of outstanding private asset-backed conduit financings and $4.3 billion of outstanding asset-backed securities that had been issued to our wholly-owned subsidiaries. The following table summarizes expected maturities of the investors’ interests in securitizations excluding those that have been issued to our wholly-owned subsidiaries at May 31, 2010 (dollars in thousands):
Scheduled maturities of long-term borrowings—owed to securitization investors
The cash collateral account loans that provide credit enhancement to certain DCMT certificates were $511 million at May 31, 2010 and were recorded in restricted cash—for securitization investors in our condensed consolidated statement of financial condition. These cash collateral accounts were funded through a loan facility entered into between a consolidated special purpose subsidiary, DRFC Funding LLC, and third-party lenders. At May 31, 2010, $341 million of the DRFC Funding LLC facility was outstanding and was recorded in long-term borrowings in our condensed consolidated statement of financial condition. Repayment of this loan facility is secured by the cash collateral account loans, which were sold to DRFC Funding LLC and are not expected to be available to our creditors.
The following table summarizes estimated maturities of the cash collateral accounts at May 31, 2010 (dollars in thousands):
Scheduled maturities of cash collateral accounts
At May 31, 2010, we had capacity to issue up to $5.4 billion in triple-A rated asset-backed securities from DCENT without the issuance of additional Class B or Class C notes as subordination, which could include $3.5
71
billion in undrawn asset-backed conduit capacity. The triple-A rating of DCENT Class A Notes issued to date has been based, in part, on an FDIC rule which creates a safe harbor that provides that the FDIC, as conservator or receiver, will not, using its power to disaffirm or repudiate contracts, seek to reclaim or recover assets transferred in connection with a securitization, or recharacterize them as assets of the insured depository institution, provided such transfer meets the conditions for sale accounting treatment under GAAP. There has been uncertainty in both the public and private securitization markets as to whether the safe harbor rule will continue to apply to securitized receivables that are treated as secured borrowings rather than as sales in accordance with GAAP as amended by Statements No. 166 and 167. Any changes that may be made to the safe harbor rule are uncertain at this time, but such changes may impact our ability and/or desire to issue either public or private asset-backed securities in the future. Our ability and/or desire to issue asset-backed securities may also be impacted by other changes to laws and regulations governing the issuance of asset-backed securities. See “—Legislative and Regulatory Developments—FDIC and SEC Rules Regarding Securitizations” and “—Financial Regulatory Reform” for further discussion.
Short-Term Borrowings. In the past, we have accessed short-term borrowings through overnight Federal Funds purchased, and other short-term borrowings with original maturities of less than one year. However, we had no outstanding short-term borrowings at May 31, 2010.
Long-Term Borrowings and Subordinated Notes. At May 31, 2010, we had $1.2 billion senior unsecured notes outstanding, including $400 million in principal amount of floating rate senior unsecured notes, which mature in June 2010, and two separate issuances of $400 million each of fixed rate senior unsecured notes, one maturing in June 2017 and the other maturing in July 2019. As of May 31, 2010, Discover Bank had a total of $1.2 billion in principal amount of subordinated notes outstanding, which included $500 million due in April 2020 that were issued in the second quarter 2010. The remaining $700 million notes outstanding are due in November 2019.
ECASLA. The Ensuring Continued Access to Student Loans Act of 2008 (as amended, “ECASLA”) provides originators of Federal Family Education Loan Program (“FFELP”) loans with a cost-effective source of funding and liquidity with respect to qualifying FFELP loans. On April 12, 2010, Discover Bank financed $0.5 billion of eligible FFELP loans through an agreement with Straight-A Funding, LLC, an asset-backed commercial paper conduit sponsored by the U.S. Department of Education under ECASLA, which matures August 2013.
On March 29, 2010, the U.S. Department of Education approved Discover Bank’s Adoption Agreement in connection with the Master Loan Sale Agreement for the 2009-10 Loan Purchase Program under ECASLA. This will permit Discover Bank to sell to the U.S. Department of Education eligible FFELP loans in multiple sale transactions occurring on or prior to October 15, 2010, which is the final date for loan sales to occur. At May 31, 2010, we had classified $1.4 billion par value of FFELP loans as held for sale on our condensed consolidated statement of financial condition, although in total, we expect to sell up to $1.5 billion of FFELP loans, which includes scheduled future disbursements. Since the loans to be sold were originated in the 2009-10 academic year, these loans are not yet due and, thus, charge-off and delinquency statistics are not applicable. For the second quarter 2010, we earned an interest yield of approximately 1.4% on our federal student loan portfolio, which is based on rates published by the U.S. Department of Education.
Additional Funding Sources
Asset-Backed Conduit Funding Facilities. We have access to committed undrawn capacity through privately placed asset-backed conduits to support the funding of our credit card loan receivables. At May 31, 2010, we had used $0.3 billion of capacity under these conduits and had increased our undrawn capacity to $3.5 billion as a result of additional commitments obtained in the second quarter 2010. Our undrawn capacity at May 31, 2010 includes $1.5 billion, which is scheduled to expire in the third quarter 2010, although we may seek to renew or replace this contingent funding at that time. As with the publicly issued term asset-backed securities
72
transactions, these privately issued conduit transactions are subject to the FDIC rule, which preserves safe-harbor treatment for issuances on or prior to September 30, 2010. See “—Securitization Financing.” It is unclear at this time whether undrawn conduit facilities entered into on or before September 30, 2010 will be “grandfathered” under the FDIC rule. If they are not grandfathered, we will lose our access to these undrawn facilities unless they qualify for the new safe harbor rule or are drawn on or before September 30, 2010.
Unsecured Committed Credit Facility. Our unsecured committed credit facility of $2.4 billion is available through May 2012. This facility serves to diversify our funding sources and enhance our liquidity. This facility is provided by a group of major global banks, and is available to both Discover Financial Services and Discover Bank (Discover Financial Services may borrow up to 30% and Discover Bank may borrow up to 100% of the total commitment). The facility is available to support general liquidity needs and may be drawn to meet short-term funding needs from time to time. We have no outstanding balances due under the facility.
Federal Reserve. Discover Bank has access to the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia’s discount window. As of May 31, 2010, Discover Bank had $6.2 billion of available capacity through the discount window. We have no borrowings outstanding under the discount window.
Credit Ratings
Our borrowing costs and capacity in certain funding markets, including securitizations and senior and subordinated debt, may be affected by the credit ratings for Discover Financial Services, Discover Bank and the securitization trusts. A credit rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities, may be subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the assigning rating organization, and each rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating. The credit ratings are summarized in the following table:
Moody’s Investors Service
Standard & Poor’s
Fitch Ratings
Several rating agencies have announced that they will be evaluating the effects of the Reform Act, when enacted, in order to determine the extent (if any) to which financial institutions, including us, may be negatively impacted. While it is unlikely that any ratings action will take place until the Reform Act is enacted and the rating agencies complete their assessments, there is no assurance that our credit ratings could not be downgraded in the future as a result of any such reviews. See “—Legislative and Regulatory Developments—Financial Regulatory Reform” for information regarding the Reform Act.
Liquidity
We seek to ensure that we have adequate liquidity to sustain business operations, fund asset growth and satisfy debt obligations. In the assessment of our liquidity needs, we also evaluate a range of stress events that would impact our access to normal funding sources, cash needs and/or liquidity. We maintain contingent funding sources, including our liquidity investment portfolio, asset-backed conduit capacity, committed credit facility capacity and Federal Reserve discount window capacity, which we could seek to utilize to satisfy liquidity needs during such stress events. We expect to be able to satisfy all maturing obligations and fund business operations during the next 12 months by utilizing our deposit channels and our contingent funding sources.
Our liquidity investment portfolio is comprised of cash and cash equivalents and high quality, liquid, unencumbered investments. Cash and cash equivalents are invested primarily in deposits with the Federal
73
Reserve, certificates of deposit with highly-rated banks which had maturities of 90 days or less when purchased, and AAA rated government money market mutual funds. Investments include certificates of deposit with maturities greater than 90 days and credit card asset-backed securities of other issuers. The level of our liquidity investment portfolio may fluctuate based upon the level of expected maturities of our funding sources as well as operational requirements and market conditions.
At May 31, 2010, our liquidity investment portfolio was $10.9 billion, which was $3.6 billion lower than the balance at November 30, 2009 due to funding of maturities of primarily asset-backed securities in the first half 2010. Although cash declined in the first half 2010, we enhanced our contingent liquidity by $3.4 billion during the same period.
Liquidity investment portfolio
Cash and cash equivalents(1)
Other investments
Total liquidity investment portfolio
Undrawn credit facilities
Asset-backed conduit funding facilities
Committed unsecured credit facility
Federal Reserve discount window
Total undrawn credit facilities
Total liquidity investment portfolio and undrawn credit facilities
Capital
We seek to manage capital to levels and composition sufficient to support the risks of the business, meet regulatory requirements and rating agency guidelines, and support future business growth. Our primary sources of capital are from the earnings generated by the business and capital markets activity.
Under regulatory capital requirements adopted by the FDIC, the Federal Reserve and other bank regulatory agencies, we, along with Discover Bank, must maintain minimum levels of capital. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can result in the initiation of certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could limit our business activities and have a direct material effect on our financial position and results. We must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items, as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors.
Our capital adequacy assessment also includes tax and accounting considerations in accordance with regulatory guidance. We maintain a substantial deferred tax asset on our balance sheet, and we include this asset when calculating our regulatory capital levels. However, for regulatory capital purposes, deferred tax assets that are dependent on future taxable income are limited to the lesser of: (i) the amount of deferred tax assets we expect to realize within one year of the calendar quarter-end date, based on our projected future taxable income for that year; or (ii) 10% of the amount of our Tier 1 capital. At May 31, 2010, no portion of our deferred tax asset was disallowed for regulatory capital purposes.
At May 31, 2010, Discover Financial Services and Discover Bank met the requirements for well-capitalized status, exceeding the regulatory minimums to which they were subject. See Note 12: Capital Adequacy to our
74
condensed consolidated financial statements for quantitative disclosures of our capital ratios and levels. Recent regulatory initiatives may subject us to increased capital requirements in the future. See “—Legislative and Regulatory Developments—Regulatory Initiatives Related to Capital and Liquidity.”
Equity Capital. At May 31, 2010, equity was $6.0 billion as compared to $8.4 billion at November 30, 2009. The decline in equity is the result of adopting Statements No. 166 and 167 in the first quarter 2010, which reduced equity by $1.3 billion, and redeeming all outstanding shares of the preferred stock that had previously been issued to the U.S. Treasury under the Capital Purchase Program in the second quarter 2010, which reduced equity by $1.2 billion. On July 7, 2010, we repurchased the warrant to purchase 20,500,413 shares of our common stock that we issued to the U.S. Treasury in connection with the issuance of our preferred stock. We repurchased the warrant from the U.S. Treasury for $172 million.
Dividends. Our board of directors declared a common stock cash dividend of $.02 per share in June 2010, payable on July 22, 2010, to holders of record on July 7, 2010. The declaration and payment of future dividends, as well as the amount thereof, are subject to the discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon our results of operations, financial condition, capital levels, cash requirements, future prospects and other factors deemed relevant by our board of directors. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that we will declare and pay any dividends in the future. In addition, as a result of applicable banking law, regulations and guidance and provisions that may be contained in our borrowing agreements or the borrowing agreements of our subsidiaries, our ability to pay dividends to our stockholders may be further limited.
Also in second quarter of 2010, we recorded $8.5 million of dividends on our preferred stock issued under the Capital Purchase Program, which represents a rate of 5% per year.
Stock Repurchase Program. On December 3, 2007, we announced that our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to $1 billion of our outstanding shares of common stock. This share repurchase program expires on November 30, 2010, and may be terminated at any time. At May 31, 2010, we had not repurchased any stock under this program.
Guarantees
Guarantees are contracts or indemnification agreements that contingently require us to make payments to a guaranteed party based on changes in an underlying asset, liability, or equity security of a guaranteed party, rate or index. Also included in guarantees are contracts that contingently require the guarantor to make payments to a guaranteed party based on another entity’s failure to perform under an agreement. Our guarantees relate to transactions processed on the Discover Network and certain transactions processed by PULSE and Diners Club. See Note 13: Commitments, Contingencies and Guarantees to our condensed consolidated financial statements for further discussion regarding our guarantees.
Contractual Obligations and Contingent Liabilities and Commitments
In the normal course of business, we enter into various contractual obligations that may require future cash payments. Contractual obligations at May 31, 2010, which include deposits, securitized debt, long-term borrowings, operating and capital lease obligations and purchase obligations were $55 billion. Contractual obligations grew $19 billion from November 30, 2009, largely as a result of the consolidation of the liabilities of the variable interest entities used in our securitization activities and also due to the growth in our deposit funding. For more information, see “—Change in Accounting Principle Related to Off-Balance Sheet Securitizations.” For a description of our contractual obligations as of November 30, 2009, see our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 2009 under “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Contractual Obligations and Contingent Liabilities and Commitments.”
75
At May 31, 2010, we had extended credit for consumer and commercial loans of approximately $168 billion, primarily arising from agreements with customers for unused lines of credit on credit cards, subject to the customer’s compliance with the related cardmember agreement. These commitments, substantially all of which we can terminate at any time and which do not necessarily represent future cash requirements, are periodically reviewed based on account usage and customer creditworthiness. In addition, in the ordinary course of business, we guarantee payment on behalf of subsidiaries relating to contractual obligations with external parties. The activities of the subsidiaries covered by any such guarantees are included in our condensed consolidated financial statements.
Market risk refers to the risk that a change in the level of one or more market prices, rates, indices, correlations or other market factors will result in losses for a position or portfolio. We are exposed to market risk primarily from changes in interest rates.
Interest Rate Risk. Changes in interest rates impact interest-earning assets, principally loan receivables. Changes in interest rates also impact interest sensitive liabilities that finance these assets, including asset-backed securitizations, deposits, and short-term and long-term borrowings.
Our interest rate risk management policies are designed to measure and manage the potential volatility of earnings that may arise from changes in interest rates by having a financing portfolio that reflects the mix of variable and fixed rate assets. To the extent that asset and related financing repricing characteristics of a particular portfolio are not matched effectively, we may utilize interest rate derivative contracts, such as swap agreements, to achieve our objectives. Interest rate swap agreements effectively convert the underlying asset or financing from fixed to floating rate or from floating to fixed rate.
We use an interest rate sensitivity simulation to assess our interest rate risk exposure. For purposes of presenting the possible earnings effect of a hypothetical, adverse change in interest rates over the 12-month period from our reporting date, we assume that all interest rate sensitive assets and liabilities will be impacted by a hypothetical, immediate 100 basis point increase in interest rates as of the beginning of the period. The sensitivity is based upon the hypothetical assumption that all relevant types of interest rates that affect our results would increase instantaneously, simultaneously and to the same degree.
Our interest rate sensitive assets include our variable rate loan receivables and the assets that make up our liquidity investment portfolio. Although we have moved the majority of our credit card loans to variable rates, some of our loans are still at fixed rates. Due to new credit card legislation, we have restrictions on our ability to mitigate interest rate risk by adjusting rates on existing balances. Assets with rates that are fixed at period end but which will mature, or otherwise contractually reset to a market-based indexed rate or other fixed rate prior to the end of the 12-month period, are considered to be rate sensitive. The latter category includes certain credit card loans that may be offered at below-market rates for an introductory period, such as balance transfers and special promotional programs, after which the loans will contractually reprice in accordance with our normal market-based pricing structure. For purposes of measuring rate sensitivity for such loans, only the effect of the hypothetical 100 basis point change in the underlying market-based indexed rate or other fixed rate has been considered rather than the full change in the rate to which the loan would contractually reprice. For assets that have a fixed interest rate at the fiscal period end but which contractually will, or are assumed to, reset to a market-based indexed rate or other fixed rate during the next 12 months, earnings sensitivity is measured from the expected repricing date. In addition, for all interest rate sensitive assets, earnings sensitivity is calculated net of expected loan losses.
Interest rate sensitive liabilities are assumed to be those for which the stated interest rate is not contractually fixed for the next 12-month period. Thus, liabilities that vary with changes in a market-based index, such as Federal Funds or LIBOR, which will reset before the end of the 12-month period, or liabilities whose rates are
76
fixed at the fiscal period end but which will mature and are assumed to be replaced with a market-based indexed rate prior to the end of the 12-month period, also are considered to be rate sensitive. For these fixed rate liabilities, earnings sensitivity is measured from the expected repricing date. Assuming an immediate 100 basis point increase in the interest rates affecting all interest rate sensitive assets and liabilities at May 31, 2010, we estimate that net interest income over the following 12-month period would increase by approximately $89 million. Assuming an immediate 100 basis point increase in the interest rates affecting all interest rate sensitive assets and liabilities at November 30, 2009, we estimated that net interest income over the following 12-month period would increase by approximately $84 million. At May 31, 2010, there had been no material changes in our interest rate risk as compared to November 30, 2009 based on this sensitivity analysis. We have not provided an estimate of any impact on net interest income of a decrease in interest rates as many of our interest rate sensitive assets and liabilities are tied to interest rates that are already at or near their minimum levels and, therefore, could not materially decrease further.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)), which are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f)) that occurred during the quarter ended May 31, 2010 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
In the normal course of business, from time to time, we have been named as a defendant in various legal actions, including arbitrations, class actions, and other litigation, arising in connection with our activities. Certain of the actual or threatened legal actions include claims for substantial compensatory and/or punitive damages or claims for indeterminate amounts of damages. We have historically relied on the arbitration clause in our cardmember agreements, which has in some instances limited the costs of, and our exposure to, litigation, but there can be no assurance that we will continue to be successful in enforcing our arbitration clause in the future. Legal challenges to the enforceability of these clauses have led most card issuers and may cause us to discontinue their use, and there are bills pending in Congress to directly or indirectly prohibit the use of pre-dispute arbitration clauses. Further, we are involved in pending legal actions challenging our arbitration clause. We are also involved, from time to time, in other reviews, investigations and proceedings (both formal and informal) by governmental agencies regarding our business, including, among other matters, accounting, tax and operational matters, some of which may result in adverse judgments, settlements, fines, penalties, injunctions, or other relief. For example, we have received a notice from the IRS related to its audit of our 1999-2005 tax years as further discussed in Note 10: Income Taxes to the condensed consolidated financial statements. Litigation and regulatory actions could also adversely affect our reputation.
77
We contest liability and/or the amount of damages as appropriate in each pending matter. In view of the inherent difficulty of predicting the outcome of such matters, particularly in cases where claimants seek substantial or indeterminate damages or where investigations and proceedings are in the early stages, we cannot predict with certainty the loss or range of loss, if any, related to such matters, how such matters will be resolved, when they will ultimately be resolved, or what the eventual settlement, fine, penalty or other relief, if any, might be. Subject to the foregoing, we believe, based on current knowledge and after consultation with counsel, that the outcome of the pending matters will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, although the outcome of such matters could be material to our operating results and cash flows for a particular future period, depending on, among other things, our level of income for such period.
You should carefully consider the risks described below, which supplement the risks disclosed in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 2009, as well as the factors described at the beginning of “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” You should also consider all of the other risks disclosed in our annual report on Form 10-K in evaluating us. Our business, financial condition, cash flows and/or results of operations could be materially adversely affected by any of these risks. The trading price of our common stock could decline due to any of these risks.
Proposed legislative and regulatory reforms may have a significant impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
The U.S. Congress is considering extensive changes to the laws regulating financial services firms. On June 30, 2010, the House approved the “Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act” (the “Reform Act”). The Senate is expected to vote on the Reform Act in mid-July and the President is expected to sign it into law shortly after final approval by the Senate. The Reform Act, as well as other legislative and regulatory changes, could have a significant impact on us by, for example, requiring us to change our business practices, requiring us to establish more stringent capital, liquidity and leverage ratio requirements, limiting our ability to pursue business opportunities, imposing additional costs on us, limiting fees we can charge for services, impacting the value of our assets, or otherwise adversely affecting our businesses. A description of the Reform Act and other legislative and regulatory developments is contained in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Legislative and Regulatory Developments.”
If enacted, the Reform Act will likely result in increased scrutiny and oversight of consumer financial services and products, primarily through the establishment of a new independent “Consumer Financial Protection Bureau” within the Federal Reserve. The Bureau would have broad rulemaking and enforcement authority over providers of credit, savings and payment services and products. The Bureau would have rulemaking and interpretive authority under existing and future consumer financial services laws and supervisory, examination and enforcement authority over institutions subject to its jurisdiction, which would include us. State officials would be authorized to enforce consumer protection rules issued by the Bureau.
In addition, the Reform Act authorizes the Federal Reserve to regulate interchange fees paid to banks on debit card transactions to ensure that they are “reasonable and proportional” to the cost of processing individual transactions, and prohibits debit card networks and issuers from requiring transactions to be processed on a single payment network. The Reform Act also prohibits credit/debit network rules that restrict merchants’ ability to offer discounts to customers in order to encourage them to use a particular form of payment, as long as such discounts do not discriminate against issuers or networks. The impact of these provisions on the debit card market and the PULSE network is uncertain at this time and will depend upon Federal Reserve implementing regulations, the actions of our competitors and the behavior of other marketplace participants.
Many provisions of the Reform Act require the adoption of rules to implement. In addition, the Reform Act mandates multiple studies, which could result in additional legislative or regulatory action. The effect of the
78
Reform Act and its implementing regulations on our business and operations could be significant. In addition, we may be required to invest significant management time and resources to address the various provisions of the Reform Act and the numerous regulations that are required to be issued under it. The Reform Act, any related legislation and any implementing regulations could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The table below sets forth the information with respect to purchases of our common stock made by us or on our behalf during the three months ended May 31, 2010:
Period
March 1 – 31, 2009
Repurchase program(1)
Employee transactions(2)
April 1 – 31, 2010
May 1 – 28, 2010
None
See “Exhibit Index” for documents filed herewith and incorporated herein by reference.
79
Signature
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
(Registrant)
By:
/S/ ROY A. GUTHRIE
Roy A. Guthrie
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
Date: July 7, 2010
80
Exhibit Index
ExhibitNumber
Description