First Mid Bancshares
FMBH
#5791
Rank
$1.29 B
Marketcap
$48.52
Share price
-1.46%
Change (1 day)
36.91%
Change (1 year)

First Mid Bancshares - 10-Q quarterly report FY


Text size:
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006
Or

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _____________ to ______________

Commission file number 0-13368


FIRST MID-ILLINOIS BANCSHARES, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware 37-1103704
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. employer identification no.)
incorporation or organization)

1515 Charleston Avenue,
Mattoon, Illinois 61938 61938
Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(217) 234-7454
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)


Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of "accelerated
filer and large accelerated filer" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check
one):

Large accelerated filer[ ] Accelerated filer[X] Non-accelerated filer [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in
Rule 12b-2 of the Act). [ ] Yes [X] No

As of August 8, 2006, 4,330,325 common shares, $4.00 par value, were
outstanding.
PART I

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


Consolidated Balance Sheets (unaudited) June 30, December 31,
------------- --------------
(In thousands, except share data) 2006 2005
------------- --------------
Assets
Cash and due from banks:
Non-interest bearing $ 21,502 $ 19,131
Interest bearing 586 426
Federal funds sold 1,822 -
------------- --------------
Cash and cash equivalents 23,910 19,557
Investment securities:
Available-for-sale, at fair value 191,874 155,841
Held-to-maturity, at amortized cost (estimated
fair value of $1,364 and $1,442 at June 30,
2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively) 1,343 1,412
Loans held for sale 2,653 1,778
Loans 715,533 636,355
Less allowance for loan losses (6,223) (4,648)
------------- --------------
Net loans 709,310 631,707
Interest receivable 6,731 6,410
Premises and equipment, net 16,607 15,168
Goodwill, net 17,366 9,034
Intangible assets, net 5,581 2,778
Other assets 7,138 6,888
------------- --------------
Total assets $982,513 $850,573
============= ==============
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Deposits:
Non-interest bearing $113,106 $ 95,305
Interest bearing 667,279 553,764
------------- --------------
Total deposits 780,385 649,069
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase 52,578 67,380
Interest payable 2,507 1,717
Other borrowings 50,000 44,500
Junior subordinated debentures 20,620 10,310
Other liabilities 3,931 5,271
------------- --------------
Total liabilities 910,021 778,247
------------- --------------
Stockholders' Equity
Common stock, $4 par value; authorized 18,000,000
shares; issued 5,662,115 shares in 2006 and
5,633,621 shares in 2005 22,699 22,534
Additional paid-in capital 20,745 19,439
Retained earnings 64,665 60,867
Deferred compensation 2,584 2,440
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (1,603) (739)
Less treasury stock at cost, 1,344,378 shares
in 2006 and 1,241,359 shares in 2005 (36,598) (32,215)
------------- --------------
Total stockholders' equity 72,492 72,326
------------- --------------
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $982,513 $850,573
============= ==============

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
Consolidated Statements of Income (unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share data)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Three months ended June 30, Six months ended June 30,
2006 2005 2006 2005
------------------ ---------------- ---------------- ---------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Interest income:
Interest and fees on loans $11,514 $ 9,290 $21,800 $18,072
Interest on investment securities 2,031 1,560 3,584 3,123
Interest on federal funds sold 88 15 105 84
Interest on deposits with other financial institutions 18 8 21 18
------------------ ---------------- ---------------- ---------------
Total interest income 13,651 10,873 25,510 21,297
Interest expense:
Interest on deposits 4,381 2,636 7,830 5,151
Interest on securities sold under agreements
to repurchase 530 336 1,011 619
Interest on other borrowings 671 526 1,270 937
Interest on subordinated debentures 304 153 494 293
------------------ ---------------- ---------------- ---------------
Total interest expense 5,886 3,651 10,605 7,000
------------------ ---------------- ---------------- ---------------
Net interest income 7,765 7,222 14,905 14,297
Provision for loan losses 211 150 404 337
------------------ ---------------- ---------------- ---------------
Net interest income after provision for loan losses 7,554 7,072 14,501 13,960
Other income:
Trust revenues 600 572 1,209 1,208
Brokerage commissions 204 115 296 212
Insurance commissions 498 401 1,074 912
Service charges 1,334 1,153 2,484 2,187
Securities gains (losses), net - 81 (1) 254
Mortgage banking revenue, net 94 168 161 321
Other 685 578 1,325 1,150
------------------ ---------------- ---------------- ---------------
Total other income 3,415 3,068 6,548 6,244
Other expense:
Salaries and employee benefits 3,884 3,406 7,447 6,880
Net occupancy and equipment expense 1,198 1,044 2,334 2,080
Amortization of intangible assets 191 145 329 287
Stationery and supplies 130 125 265 264
Legal and professional 344 472 631 858
Marketing and promotion 244 228 420 351
Other 1,146 1,074 2,240 2,080
------------------ ---------------- ---------------- ---------------
Total other expense 7,137 6,494 13,666 12,800
------------------ ---------------- ---------------- ---------------
Income before income taxes 3,832 3,646 7,383 7,404
Income taxes 1,310 1,284 2,457 2,607
------------------ ---------------- ---------------- ---------------
Net income $ 2,522 $ 2,362 $ 4,926 $ 4,797
================== ================ ================ ===============

Per share data:
Basic earnings per share $ 0.58 $ 0.53 $ 1.13 $ 1.08
Diluted earnings per share $ 0.57 $ 0.52 $ 1.11 $ 1.06
Cash dividends per share $ 0.26 $ 0.24 $ 0.26 $ 0.24
</TABLE>

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited)
(In thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Six months ended June 30,
2006 2005
------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C>
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income $ 4,926 $ 4,797
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities:
Provision for loan losses 404 337
Depreciation, amortization and accretion, net 853 749
92 -
Stock-based compensation expense
(Gain) loss on sale of securities, net 1 (254)
Loss on sale of other real property owned, net 38 108
Gain on sale of loans held for sale, net (197) (378)
Origination of loans held for sale (14,864) (29,543)
Proceeds from sale of loans held for sale 14,186 27,769
Decrease in other assets 584 200
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities (36) 43
------------ ------------
Net cash provided by operating activities 5,987 3,828
------------ ------------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Proceeds from sales of securities available-for-sale 5,336 38,702
Proceeds from maturities of securities available-for-sale 35,139 58,456
roceeds from maturities of securities held-to-maturity 120 120
Purchases of securities available-for-sale (24,981) (76,685)
Purchases of securities held-to-maturity - (145)
Net increase in loans (23,642) (17,660)
Purchases of premises and equipment (753) (522)
Proceeds from sales of other real property owned 274 511
Payment related to acquisition, net of cash and
cash equivalents acquired (12,060) -
------------ ------------
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities (20,567) 2,777
------------ ------------
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net increase (decrease) in deposits 23,202 (12,848)
Decrease in repurchase agreements (14,802) (9,630)
Proceeds from short term FHLB advances 65,600 7,000
Proceeds from long term FHLB advances 10,000 12,000
Repayment of short term FHLB advances (79,600) (7,300)
Proceeds from short term debt 500 3,500
Proceeds from long term debt 15,000 -
Repayment of short term debt (6,000) (2,100)
Issuance of junior subordinated debentures 10,310 -
Proceeds from issuance of common stock 475 653
Purchase of treasury stock (4,238) (3,303)
Dividends paid on common stock (1,514) (1,431)
------------ ------------
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 18,933 (13,459)
------------ ------------
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 4,353 (6,854)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 19,557 23,554
------------ ------------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $23,910 $16,700
============ ============

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest $9,815 $7,000
Income taxes 2,360 2,809
Supplemental disclosures of noncash investing and
financing activities
Loans transferred to real estate owned 346 50
Dividends reinvested in common stock 757 699
Net tax benefit related to option and deferred
compensation plans 147 118
</TABLE>

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)

Basis of Accounting and Consolidation

The unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of First
Mid-Illinois Bancshares, Inc. ("Company") and its wholly-owned subsidiaries:
Mid-Illinois Data Services, Inc. ("MIDS"), The Checkley Agency, Inc.
("Checkley"), Mansfield Bancorp, Inc. ("Mansfield") and its wholly-owned
subsidiary Peoples State Bank of Mansfield ("Peoples State Bank") and First
Mid-Illinois Bank & Trust, N.A. ("First Mid Bank"). All significant intercompany
balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The financial
information reflects all adjustments which, in the opinion of management, are
necessary for a fair presentation of the results of the interim periods ended
June 30, 2006 and 2005, and all such adjustments are of a normal recurring
nature. Certain amounts in the prior year's consolidated financial statements
have been reclassified to conform to the June 30, 2006 presentation and there
was no impact on net income or stockholders' equity. The results of the interim
period ended June 30, 2006 are not necessarily indicative of the results
expected for the year ending December 31, 2006. The Company operates as a
one-segment entity for financial reporting purposes.

The 2005 year-end consolidated balance sheet data was derived from audited
financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by generally
accepted accounting principles.

The unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance
with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X and do not
include all of the information required by U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles for complete financial statements and related footnote disclosures
although the Company believes that the disclosures made are adequate to make the
information not misleading. These financial statements should be read in
conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto
included in the Company's 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K.


Website

The Company maintains a website at www.firstmid.com. All periodic and current
reports of the Company and amendments to these reports filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission ("SEC") can be accessed, free of charge, through this
website as soon as reasonably practicable after these materials are filed with
the SEC.


Comprehensive Income

The Company's comprehensive income for the three and six-month periods ended
June 30, 2006 and 2005 was as follows (in thousands):


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Three months ended Six months ended
June 30, June 30,
------------------------- --------------------------
2006 2005 2006 2005
------------ ------------ ------------ -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net income $2,522 $2,362 $4,926 $4,797
Other comprehensive income:
Unrealized loss during the period (1,174) 805 (1,417) (636)
Less realized (gain) loss during the period - (81) 1 (254)
Tax effect 458 (282) 552 347
------------ ------------ ------------ -------------
Total other comprehensive loss (716) 442 (864) (543)
------------ ------------ ------------ -------------
Comprehensive income $1,806 $2,804 $4,062 $4,254
============ ============ ============ =============
</TABLE>


New Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 155 (FAS 155), "Accounting for
Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments: an amendment of FASB Statements No. 133
and 140." FAS 155 permits fair value re-measurement for any hybrid financial
instrument that contains an embedded derivative that otherwise would require
bifurcation, clarifies which interest-only strips and principal-only strips are
not subject to the requirements of Statement 133, establishes a requirement to
evaluate interests in securitized financial assets to identify interests that
are freestanding derivatives or that are hybrid financial instruments that
contain an embedded derivative requiring bifurcation, clarifies that
concentrations of credit risk in the form of subordination are not embedded
derivatives, and amends Statement 140 to eliminate the prohibition on a
qualifying special purpose entity from holding a derivative financial instrument
that pertains to a beneficial interest other than another derivative financial
instrument. FAS 155 is effective for all financial instruments acquired or
issued after the beginning of an entity's first fiscal year that begins after
September 15, 2006. The Company does not expect the adoption of FAS 155 to have
a material effect on the results of operations or the statement of condition.


In March 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
156 (FAS 156), "Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets: an amendment of
FASB Statement No. 140. ". FAS 140 establishes, among other things, the
accounting for all separately recognized servicing assets and servicing
liabilities. This Statement amends FAS 140 to require that all separately
recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities be initially measured at
fair value, if practicable. This Statement permits, but does not require, the
subsequent measurement of separately recognized servicing assets and servicing
liabilities at fair value. Under this Statement, an entity can elect subsequent
fair value measurement to account for its separately recognized servicing assets
and servicing liabilities. Adoption of this Statement is required as of the
beginning of the first fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006. The
Company does not expect the adoption of FAS 156 to have a material effect on the
results of operations or the statement of condition.

In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48), "Accounting
for Uncertainty in Income Taxes - an Interpretation of FASB Statement 109,"
which provides guidance on the measurement, recognition, and disclosure of tax
positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The Interpretation also
provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, and
disclosure. FIN 48 prescribes that a tax position should only be recognized if
it is more-likely-than-not that the position will be sustained upon examination
by the appropriate taxing authority. A tax position that meets this threshold is
measured as the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely
of being realized upon ultimate settlement. The cumulative effect of applying
the provisions of FIN 48 is to be reported as an adjustment to the beginning
balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption. FIN 48 is effective for
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company is currently
assessing the impact, if any, that the adoption of this Interpretation will have
on its financial statements.


Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share ("EPS") is calculated as net income divided by the
weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted EPS is computed
using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding, increased by the
assumed conversion of the Company's stock options, unless anti-dilutive. The
components of basic and diluted earnings per common share for the three and
six-month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 were as follows:


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Three months ended Six months ended
June 30, June 30,
------------------------------ ------------------------------
2006 2005 2006 2005
--------------- -------------- -------------- ---------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Basic Earnings per Share:
Net income $2,522,000 $2,362,000 $4,926,000 $4,797,000
Weighted average common shares outstanding 4,338,642 4,431,866 4,361,079 4,441,062
--------------- -------------- -------------- ---------------
Basic earnings per common share $ .58 $ .53 $1.13 $1.08
=============== ============== ============== ===============
Diluted Earnings per Share:
Weighted average common shares outstanding 4,338,642 4,431,866 4,361,079 4,441,062
Assumed conversion of stock options 86,827 90,799 87,850 91,957
--------------- -------------- -------------- ---------------
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding 4,425,469 4,522,665 4,448,929 4,533,019
--------------- -------------- -------------- ---------------
Diluted earnings per common share $ .57 $ .52 $1.11 $1.06
=============== ============== ============== ===============
</TABLE>

Stock options for 72,000 shares of common stock were not considered in computing
diluted earnings per share for 2006 and 2005 because they were anti-dilutive.


Acquisition

On May 1, 2006, the Company completed the acquisition, for $24 million in cash,
of all of the outstanding common stock of Mansfield Bancorp, Inc. ("Mansfield"),
and its wholly-owned subsidiary, People State Bank of Mansfield ("Peoples"),
located in Mansfield, Mahomet and Weldon, Illinois, in order to expand its
market presence in this area. The Company financed the purchase price through a
dividend of $5 million from First Mid Bank, an issuance of $10 million of trust
preferred securities and a $9.5 million draw on the Company's line of credit
with The Northern Trust Company. Following the completion of the acquisition,
the Company filed certain regulatory applications related to the planned
post-completion mergers of Mansfield into Peoples and Peoples into First Mid
Bank. Following the completion of these mergers, Mansfield and Peoples will
cease to exist and Peoples' current operations will be merged into First Mid
Bank's. These mergers are scheduled for completion in the third quarter of 2006.

The transaction has been accounted for as a purchase, and the results of
operations of Mansfield and Peoples since the acquisition date have been
included in the consolidated financial statements. The following table
summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities
assumed at the date of this transaction (in thousands):


Cash and cash equivalents $12,193
Investment securities 52,740
Loans 55,770
Less allowance for loan losses (1,405)
Premises and equipment 1,465
Goodwill 8,332
Core deposit intangibles 3,132
Other asset 1,627
-------------
Total assets acquired 133,854
-------------
Deposits 108,114
Deferred income taxes 865
Other liabilities 622
-------------
Total liabilities assumed 109,601
-------------
Net assets acquired $ 24,253
=============


Transaction costs related to the completion of the transaction were
approximately $253,000. The fair value of deposits acquired in the transaction
exceeded the book value, resulting in a core deposit intangible asset of
$3,132,000, which is being amortized over 10 years. The total fair value of the
assets and liabilities acquired exceeded the book value, resulting in goodwill
of $8,332,000, which is not subject to amortization. The core deposit
intangibles and goodwill are not deductible for tax purposes.

The following unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information
presents the results of operations of the Company, including the effects of the
purchase accounting adjustments, issuance of trust preferred securities and bank
loan, had the acquisition taken place at the beginning of each period (in
thousands):


For the period For the period
ended ended
June 30, 2006 June 30, 2005
--------------- ---------------
Net interest income $15,871 $15,941
Provision for loan losses 444 397
Non-interest income 6,773 6,728
Non-interest expense 14,574 14,291
--------------- ---------------
Income before income taxes 7,626 7,981
Income tax expense 2,659 2,705
--------------- ---------------
Net income $ 4,967 $ 5,276
=============== ===============

Earnings per share
Basic $1.14 $1.19
Diluted $ 1.12 $1.16
Basic weighted average shares outstanding 4,361,079 4,441,062
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding 4,448,929 4,533,019



The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements do not reflect
any anticipated cost savings and revenue enhancements. Additionally, the income
statement for the first six months of 2006 includes merger-related expenses.
Accordingly, the pro forma results of operations of the Company as of and after
the merger may not be indicative of the results that actually would have
occurred if the merger had been in effect during the periods presented or of the
results that may be attained in the future.


Goodwill and Intangible Assets

The Company has goodwill from business combinations, intangible assets from
branch acquisitions, identifiable intangible assets assigned to core deposit
relationships and customer lists of Checkley, and intangible assets arising from
the rights to service mortgage loans for others.

The following table presents gross carrying value and accumulated amortization
by major intangible asset class as of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 (in
thousands):


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
June 30, 2006 December 31, 2005
-------------------------- ------------------------
Gross Gross
Carrying Accumulated Carrying Accumulated
Value Amortization Value Amortization
---------- --------------- ---------- --------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Goodwill not subject to amortization
(effective 1/1/02) $21,126 $3,760 $12,794 $3,760
Intangibles from branch acquisition 3,015 1,860 3,015 1,760
Core deposit intangibles 5,937 2,574 2,805 2,440
Mortgage servicing rights 608 608 608 608
Customer list intangibles 1,904 841 1,904 746
---------- --------------- ---------- --------------
$32,590 $9,643 $21,126 $9,314
========== =============== ========== ==============
</TABLE>


The following table provides a reconciliation of the purchase price paid for the
Mansfield acquisition and the amount of goodwill recorded (in thousands):

Purchase price $24,000
Less: Mansfield equity (14,927)
---------
9,073
Direct acquisition costs 253
Less purchase accounting adjustments:
Investments $993
Fixed assets 69
Existing goodwill 211
Core deposit intangible (3,132)
--------
(1,859)
Deferred taxes on purchase accounting adjustments 865
---------
Resulting goodwill from Mansfield acquisition $8,332
=========



Total amortization expense for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 was
as follows (in thousands):

June 30,
2006 2005
-------------- -------------
Intangibles from branch acquisition $100 $100
Core deposit intangibles 134 82
Mortgage servicing rights - 10
Customer list intangibles 95 95
-------------- -------------
$329 $287
============== =============


Aggregate amortization expense for the current year and estimated amortization
expense for each of the five succeeding years is shown in the table below (in
thousands):

Aggregate amortization expense:
For period ended 6/30/06 $329

Estimated amortization expense:
For period 07/01/06-12/31/06 $433
For year ended 12/31/07 $812
For year ended 12/31/08 $765
For year ended 12/31/09 $730
For year ended 12/31/10 $704
For year ended 12/31/11 $704


In accordance with the provisions of SFAS 142, the Company performed testing of
goodwill for impairment as of September 30, 2005, and determined that, as of
that date, goodwill was not impaired. Management also concluded that the
remaining amounts and amortization periods were appropriate for all intangible
assets.


Stock Incentive Plan

Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company accounted for its Stock Incentive Plan
("Plan") under the recognition and measurement provisions of APB Opinion No. 25,
"Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees" ("APB No. 25"), and related
Interpretations, as permitted by Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB")
Statement No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation" ("SFAS No. 123").
No stock option compensation cost was recognized in the Statement of Income as
all options granted had an exercise price equal to the market value of the
underlying common stock on the grant date.

In December 2004, the FASB issued Statement No. 123 (revised 2004), "Share-Based
Payment" ("SFAS No. 123R"), which requires the cost resulting from stock options
be measured at fair value and recognized in earnings. This Statement replaces
SFAS No. 123 and supercedes APB No. 25 which permitted the recognition of
compensation expense using the intrinsic value method.

Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the fair value recognition
provisions of SFAS 123R using the modified prospective application method. Under
this method, the Statement applies to new awards and to awards modified,
repurchased or cancelled after the effective date. Additionally, compensation
cost for a portion of awards for which requisite services have not been rendered
that are outstanding as of the effective date shall be recognized as the
requisite service is rendered or after the effective date. As a result of this
adoption, the Company's income before income taxes and net income for the six
months ended June 30, 2006 have included stock option compensation cost of
$92,000 and $88,000, respectively, which represents $.02 impact on basic and
diluted earnings per share for the period. The following table illustrates the
effect on net income and earnings per share if the Company had applied the fair
value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 on stock-based employee
compensation for the three and six- month periods ended June 30, 2005.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Three months ended Six months ended
June 30, 2005 June 30, 2005
------------------- --------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Net income, as reported $2,362 $4,797
Stock based compensation expense determined
under fair value based method, net of
related tax effect (87) (183)
------------------- --------------------
Pro forma net income $2,275 $4,614
=================== ====================
Basic Earnings Per Share:
As reported $.53 $ 1.08
Pro forma .51 1.04
Diluted Earnings Per Share:
As reported $.52 $ 1.06
Pro forma .50 1.02
</TABLE>
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S  DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis is intended to provide a better
understanding of the consolidated financial condition and results of operations
of the Company and its subsidiaries as of, and for the periods ended, June 30,
2006 and 2005. This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with
the consolidated financial statements, related notes and selected financial data
appearing elsewhere in this report.


Forward-Looking Statements

This report contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, such as discussions of the
Company's pricing and fee trends, credit quality and outlook, liquidity, new
business results, expansion plans, anticipated expenses and planned schedules.
The Company intends such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe
harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and is including this statement for
purposes of these safe harbor provisions. Forward-looking statements, which are
based on certain assumptions and describe future plans, strategies and
expectations of the Company, are identified by use of the words "believe",
"expect", "intend", "anticipate", "estimate", "project", or similar expressions.
Actual results could differ materially from the results indicated by these
statements because the realization of those results is subject to many
uncertainties including: changes in interest rates, general economic conditions,
legislative/regulatory changes, monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S.
government, including policies of the U.S. Treasury and the Federal Reserve
Board, the quality or composition of the loan or investment portfolios, demand
for loan products, deposit flows, competition, demand for financial services in
the Company's market area and accounting principles, policies and guidelines.
These risks and uncertainties should be considered in evaluating forward-looking
statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. Further
information concerning the Company and its business, including additional
factors that could materially affect the Company's financial results, is
included in the Company's 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K under the headings
"Item 1. Business and "Item 1A. Risk Factors."


New Accounting Standards Adopted During 2006

Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company accounted for its Stock Incentive Plan
("Plan") under the recognition and measurement provisions of APB No. 25, and
related Interpretations, as permitted by SFAS No. 123. No stock option
compensation cost was recognized in the Statement of Income as all options
granted had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common
stock on the grant date.

Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the fair value recognition
provisions of SFAS 123R using the modified prospective application method. Under
this method, the Statement applies to new awards and to awards modified,
repurchased or cancelled after the effective date. Additionally, compensation
cost for a portion of awards for which requisite services have not been rendered
that are outstanding as of the effective date shall be recognized as the
requisite service is rendered or after the effective date. As a result of this
adoption, the Company's income before income taxes and net income for the three
months ended June 30, 2006 have included stock option compensation cost of
$43,000 and $41,000, respectively, which represents $.01 impact on basic and
diluted earnings per share for the period. The Company's income before income
taxes and net income for the six months ended June 30, 2006 have included stock
option compensation cost of $92,000 and $88,000, respectively, which represents
$.02 impact on basic and diluted earnings per share for the period. As of June
30, 2006, there was approximately $194,000 of total unrecognized compensation
cost related to nonvested options under the Plan. The Company expects to
recognize that cost over a weighted average period of less than four years.


Overview

This overview of management's discussion and analysis highlights selected
information in this document and may not contain all of the information that is
important to you. For a more complete understanding of trends, events,
commitments, uncertainties, liquidity, capital resources, and critical
accounting estimates, you should carefully read this entire document. These have
an impact on the Company's financial condition and results of operations.

Net income was $4,926,000 and $4,797,000 and diluted earnings per share was
$1.11 and $1.06 for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005. The following
table shows the Company's annualized performance ratios for the six months ended
June 30, 2006 and 2005, compared to the performance ratios for the year ended
December 31, 2005:


Six months ended Year ended
June 30, June 30, December 31,
2006 2005 2005
------------ ---------- ------------
Return on average assets 1.10% 1.17% 1.18%
Return on average equity 13.42% 13.64% 13.64%
Average equity to average assets 8.23% 8.54% 8.64%


Total assets at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 were $982.5 million and
$850.6 million, respectively. The increase in net assets was due to assets
acquired of $133.9 million in the acquisition of Mansfield. Total assets
excluding acquired assets decreased slightly as the result of a decrease in
available-for-sale securities that matured during the first six months of 2006
and were not replaced and seasonal declines in cash and cash equivalents which
were offset by an increase in loan balances, primarily residential and
commercial real estate. Net loan balances were $709.3 million at June 30, 2006,
an increase of $77.6 million, or 12.2%, from $631.7 million at December 31,
2005, primarily due to loans acquired in the acquisition of Mansfield and also
increases in residential and commercial real estate loans. Total deposit
balances increased to $780.4 million at June 30, 2006 from $649.1 million at
December 31, 2005.

Net interest margin, defined as net interest income divided by average
interest-earning assets, was 3.58% for the six months ended June 30, 2006, down
from 3.73% for the same period in 2005. The decrease in the net interest margin
is attributable to a greater increase in borrowing and deposit rates compared to
the increase in interest-earning asset rates. Net interest income before the
provision for loan losses was $14.9 million with growth in average earning
assets of $63.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 compared to net
interest income of $14.3 million for the same period in 2005.

Noninterest income increased $304,000, or 4.9%, to $6.5 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2006 compared to $6.2 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2005. In addition to increased income due to the acquisition of
Mansfield, the primary reason for this increase was an increase in ATM and
bankcard service fees, service charges for overdrafts and insurance commissions
during the first six months of 2006 compared to the same period in 2005.

Noninterest expense increased 6.8%, or $866,000, to $13.7 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2006 compared to $12.8 million during the same period in
2005. In addition to increases in noninterest expense due to the acquisition of
Mansfield, the primary factor in the expense increase was increased salaries and
benefits expense that resulted from merit increases for continuing employees,
additional compensation expense recorded in accordance with the provisions of
SFAS 123R, and an increase in occupancy expense for a new office location for
Checkley.

Following is a summary of the factors that contributed to the changes
in net income (in thousands):


2006 versus 2005
Three months ended Six months ended
June 30 June 30
------------------- ------------------

Net interest income $ 543 $ 608
Provision for loan losses (61) (67)
Other income, including securities
transactions 347 304
Other expenses (643) (866)
Income taxes (26) 150
------------------- ------------------
Increase in net income $160 $129
=================== ==================


Credit quality is an area of importance to the Company. Total nonperforming
loans were $3.7 million at June 30, 2006, compared to $3.7 million at June 30,
2005 and $3.5 million at December 31, 2005. The Company's provision for loan
loss for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 was $404,000 and $337,000,
respectively. At June 30, 2006, the composition of the loan portfolio remained
similar to the same period last year. During the six months ended June 30, 2006,
net charge-offs were .07% of average loans compared to .09% for the same period
in 2005. Loans secured by both commercial and residential real estate comprised
70% and 72% of the loan portfolio as of June 30, 2006 and 2005.

The Company's capital position remains strong and the Company has consistently
maintained regulatory capital ratios above the "well-capitalized" standards. The
Company's Tier 1 capital to risk weighted assets ratio calculated under the
regulatory risk-based capital requirements at June 30, 2006 and 2005 was 9.72%
and 11.13%, respectively. The Company's total capital to risk weighted assets
ratio calculated under the regulatory risk-based capital requirements at June
30, 2006 and 2005 was 10.49% and 11.90%, respectively.

The Company's liquidity position remains sufficient to fund operations and meet
the requirements of borrowers, depositors, and creditors. The Company maintains
various sources of liquidity to fund its cash needs. See discussion under the
heading "Liquidity" for a full listing of sources and anticipated significant
contractual obligations. The Company enters into financial instruments with
off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing
needs of its customers. These financial instruments include lines of credit,
letters of credit and other commitments to extend credit. The total outstanding
commitments at June 30, 2006 and 2005 were $118.8 million and $114.4 million,
respectively. This increase is primarily attributable to the Mansfield
acquisition.


Critical Accounting Policies

The Company has established various accounting policies that govern the
application of U.S. generally accepted accounting principles in the preparation
of the Company's financial statements. The significant accounting policies of
the Company are described in the footnotes to the consolidated financial
statements included in the Company's 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Certain
accounting policies involve significant judgments and assumptions by management
that have a material impact on the carrying value of certain assets and
liabilities; management considers such accounting policies to be critical
accounting policies. The judgments and assumptions used by management are based
on historical experience and other factors, which are believed to be reasonable
under the circumstances. Because of the nature of the judgments and assumptions
made by management, actual results could differ from these judgments and
assumptions, which could have a material impact on the carrying values of assets
and liabilities and the results of operations of the Company.

The Company believes the allowance for loan losses is the critical accounting
policy that requires the most significant judgments and assumptions used in the
preparation of its consolidated financial statements. In estimating the
allowance for loan losses, management utilizes historical experience, as well as
other factors, including the effect of changes in the local real estate market
on collateral values, the effect on the loan portfolio of current economic
indicators and their probable impact on borrowers, and increases or decreases in
nonperforming and impaired loans. Changes in these factors may cause
management's estimate of the allowance for loan losses to increase or decrease
and result in adjustments to the Company's provision for loan losses. See
heading "Loan Quality and Allowance for Loan Losses" for a more detailed
description of the Company's estimation process and methodology related to the
allowance for loan losses.
Results of Operations

Net Interest Income

The largest source of revenue for the Company is net interest income. Net
interest income represents the difference between total interest income earned
on earning assets and total interest expense paid on interest-bearing
liabilities. The amount of interest income is dependent upon many factors,
including the volume and mix of earning assets, the general level of interest
rates and the dynamics of changes in interest rates. The cost of funds necessary
to support earning assets varies with the volume and mix of interest-bearing
liabilities and the rates paid to attract and retain such funds. The Company's
average balances, interest income and expense and rates earned or paid for major
balance sheet categories are set forth in the following table (dollars in
thousands):

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Six months ended Six months ended
June 30, 2006 June 30, 2005
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average Average Average Average
Balance Interest Rate Balance Interest Rate
------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
ASSETS
Interest-bearing deposits $ 978 $ 21 4.33% $1,432 $ 18 2.50%
Federal funds sold 6,340 105 3.34% 7,166 84 2.34%
Investment securities
Taxable 150,221 3,225 4.29% 145,833 2,659 3.65%
Tax-exempt (1) 16,659 359 4.31% 20,959 464 4.43%
Loans (2)(3) 661,783 21,800 6.64% 596,951 18,072 6.11%
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total earning assets 835,981 25,510 6.15% 772,341 21,297 5.55%
Cash and due from banks 17,635 18,180
Premises and equipment 15,702 15,093
Other assets 28,041 22,302
Allowance for loan losses (5,247) (4,737)
------------ ---------------
Total assets $892,112 $823,179
============ ===============

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Interest-bearing deposits
Demand deposits $233,133 $ 2,213 1.91% $228,689 $1,203 1.06%
Savings deposits 61,252 143 .47% 61,537 119 .39%
Time deposits 298,978 5,474 3.69% 261,010 3,829 2.96%
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase 50,906 1,011 4.00% 59,608 619 2.09%
FHLB advances 42,321 954 4.55% 32,453 807 5.01%
Federal funds purchased 5,851 95 3.27% 635 10 3.23%
Junior subordinated debt 14,069 494 7.08% 10,310 293 5.74%
Other debt 7,392 221 6.03% 5,901 120 4.10%
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total interest-bearing liabilities 713,902 10,605 3.00% 660,143 7,000 2.14%
Non interest-bearing demand deposits 98,897 87,828
Other liabilities 5,913 4,873
Stockholders' equity 73,400 70,335
------------ ---------------
Total liabilities & equity $892,112 $823,179
============ ===============
Net interest income $14,905 $14,297
============ ===========
Net interest spread 3.15% 3.41%
Impact of non-interest bearing funds .43% .32%
------------ ------------
Net yield on interest- earning assets 3.58% 3.73%
============ ============
</TABLE>

(1) The tax-exempt income is not recorded on a tax equivalent basis.
(2)Nonaccrual loans have been included in the average balances.
(3) Includes loans held for sale.

Changes in net interest income may also be analyzed by segregating the volume
and rate components of interest income and interest expense. The following table
summarizes the approximate relative contribution of changes in average volume
and interest rates to changes in net interest income for the six months ended
June 30, 2006, compared to the same period in 2005 (in thousands):



For the six months ended June 30,
2006 compared to 2005
Increase / (Decrease)
Total
Change Volume (1) Rate (1)
----------------------------------------
Earning Assets:
Interest-bearing deposits $ 3 $ (15) $ 18
Federal funds sold 21 (26) 47
Investment securities:
Taxable 566 83 483
Tax-exempt (2) (105) (93) (12)
Loans (3) 3,728 2,073 1,655
----------------------------------------
Total interest income 4,213 2,022 2,191
-----------------------------------------

Interest-Bearing Liabilities:
Interest-bearing deposits
Demand deposits 1,010 24 986
Savings deposits 24 (1) 25
Time deposits 1,645 610 1,035
Securities sold under
agreements to repurchase 392 (260) 652
FHLB advances 147 342 (195)
Federal funds purchased 85 85 -
Junior subordinated debt 201 123 78
Other debt 101 35 66
----------------------------------------
Total interest expense 3,605 958 2,647
----------------------------------------
Net interest income $ 608 $ 1,064 $(456)
========================================

(1) Changes attributable to the combined impact of volume and rate have been
allocated proportionately to the change due to volume and the change due to
rate.

(2) The tax-exempt income is not recorded on a tax-equivalent basis.

(3) Nonaccrual loans have been included in the average balances.


Net interest income increased $608,000, or 4.3% to $14.9 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2006, from $14.3 million for the same period in 2005. The
increase in net interest income was due to an increase in rates and growth in
earning assets, primarily composed of loan growth, which was largely offset by
an increase in the cost of interest-bearing liabilities.

For the six months ended June 30, 2006, average earning assets increased by
$63.6 million, or 8.2%, and average interest-bearing liabilities increased $53.8
million, or 8.1%, compared with average balances for the same period in 2005.
The changes in average balances for these periods are shown below:

o Average loans increased by $64.8 million or 10.9%.

o Average securities increased by $.1 million or 0.1%.

o Average interest-bearing deposits increased by $42.1 million or 7.6%.

o Average securities sold under agreements to repurchase decreased by
$8.7 million or 14.6%.

o Average borrowings and other debt increased by $20.3 million or 41.2%.

o Net interest margin decreased to 3.58% for the first six months of
2006 from 3.73% for the first six months of 2005.

To compare the tax-exempt yields on interest-earning assets to taxable yields,
the Company also computes non-GAAP net interest income on a tax equivalent basis
(TE) where the interest earned on tax-exempt securities is adjusted to an amount
comparable to interest subject to normal income taxes assuming a federal tax
rate of 34% (referred to as the tax equivalent adjustment). The net yield on
interest-earning assets (TE) was 3.62% for the first six months of 2006 and
3.78% for the first six months of 2005. The TE adjustments to net interest
income for June 30, 2006 and 2005 were $185,000 and $239,000, respectively.

Provision for Loan Losses

The provision for loan losses for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005
was $404,000 and $337,000, respectively. Nonperforming loans were $3.7 million
as of June 30, 2006 and 2005. Net charge-offs were $234,000 for the six months
ended June 30, 2006 compared to $271,000 during the same period in 2005. For
information on loan loss experience and nonperforming loans, see discussion
under the "Nonperforming Loans" and "Loan Quality and Allowance for Loan Losses"
sections below.

Other Income

An important source of the Company's revenue is derived from other income. The
following table sets forth the major components of other income for the three
months and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 (in thousands):



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Three months ended June 30, Six months ended June 30,
2006 2005 $ Change 2006 2005 $ Change
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Trust $600 $572 $ 28 $1,209 $1,208 $ 1
Brokerage 204 115 89 296 212 84
Insurance commissions 498 401 97 1,074 912 162
Service charges 1,334 1,153 181 2,484 2,187 297
Security gains (losses) - 81 (81) (1) 254 (255)
Mortgage banking 94 168 (74) 161 321 (160)
Other 685 578 107 1,325 1,150 175
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Total other income $3,415 $3,068 $ 347 $6,548 $6,244 $ 304
============= ============= ============= ============= ============= =============
</TABLE>


Following are explanations for the three months ended June 30, 2006 compared to
the same period in 2005:

o Trust revenues increased $28,000 or 4.9% to $600,000 from $572,000.
Trust assets, at market value, were $410 million at June 30, 2006
compared to $390 million at June 30, 2005. The increase in trust
revenues was due to non-recurring executor and sales fees received in
the second quarter of 2006 that were not received in 2005.

o Revenues from brokerage increased $89,000 or 77.4% to $204,000 from
$115,000 due to greater commissions received on sales of annuities.

o Insurance commissions increased $97,000 or 24.2% to $498,000 from
$401,000 due to an increase in commissions received on sales of
business property and casualty insurance.

o Fees from service charges increased $181,000 or 15.7% to $1,334,000
from $1,153,000. This was primarily the result of an increase in the
number of overdrafts and an increase in the per overdraft fee to $25
from $22.50.

o The sale of securities during the three months ended June 30, 2006
resulted in no net securities gains or losses compared to the three
months ended June 30, 2005 which resulted in securities gains of
$81,000.

o Mortgage banking income decreased $74,000 or 44.0% to $94,000 from
$168,000. This decrease was due to the decreased volume of fixed rate
loans originated and sold by First Mid Bank. Loans sold balances were
as follows:

o $7.9 million (representing 76 loans) for the second quarter of
2006.
o $13.8 million (representing 139 loans) for the second quarter of
2005.

First Mid Bank generally releases the servicing rights on loans sold
into the secondary market.

o Other income increased $107,000 or 18.5% to $685,000 from $578,000.
This increase was primarily due to increased ATM service fees.


Following are explanations for the six months ended June 30, 2006 compared to
the same period in 2005:

o Trust revenues increased $1,000 or .1% to $1,209,000 from $1,208,000.
Trust assets, at market value, were $410 million at June 30, 2006
compared to $390 million at June 30, 2005.

o Revenues from brokerage increased $84,000 or 39.6% to $296,000 from
$212,000 due to greater commissions received on sales of annuities.

o Insurance commissions increased $162,000 or 17.8% to $1,074,000 from
$912,000 due to an increase in commissions received on sales of
business property and casualty insurance.

o Fees from service charges increased $297,000 or 13.6% to $2,484,000
from $2,187,000. This was primarily the result of an increase in the
number of overdrafts and an increase in the per overdraft fee to $25
from $22.50.

o The sale of securities during the six months ended June 30, 2006
resulted in net securities losses of $1,000 compared to the six months
ended June 30, 2005 which resulted in securities gains of $254,000.

o Mortgage banking income decreased $160,000 or 49.8% to $161,000 from
$321,000. This decrease was due to the decreased volume of fixed rate
loans originated and sold by First Mid Bank. Loans sold balances were
as follows:

o $14.0 million (representing 138 loans) for the first six months
of 2006.

o $27.4 million (representing 268 loans) for the first six months
of 2005.

First Mid Bank generally releases the servicing rights on loans sold
into the secondary market.

o Other income increased $175,000 or 15.2% to $1,325,000 from
$1,150,000. This increase was primarily due to increased ATM service
fees.


Other Expense

The major categories of other expense include salaries and employee benefits,
occupancy and equipment expenses and other operating expenses associated with
day-to-day operations. The following table sets forth the major components of
other expense for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005
(in thousands):

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Three months ended June 30, Six months ended June 30,
2006 2005 $ Change 2006 2005 $ Change
------------ ------------- ------------- ----------- ------------ -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Salaries and benefits $ 3,884 $ 3,406 $ 478 $ 7,447 $ 6,880 $ 567
Occupancy and equipment 1,198 1,044 154 2,334 2,080 254
Amortization of intangibles 191 145 46 329 287 42
Stationery and supplies 130 125 5 265 264 1
Legal and professional fees 344 472 (128) 631 858 (227)
Marketing and promotion 244 228 16 420 351 69
Other operating expenses 1,146 1,074 72 2,240 2,080 160
------------ ------------- ------------- ----------- ------------ -------------
Total other expense $ 7,137 $ 6,494 $ 643 $13,666 $12,800 $ 866
============ ============= ============= =========== ============ =============
</TABLE>

Following are explanations for the three months ended June 30, 2006 compared to
the same period in 2005:

o Salaries and employee benefits, the largest component of other
expense, increased $478,000 or 14.0% to $3,884,000 from $3,406,000.
This increase is due to additional expense as a result of the
acquisition of Mansfield, merit increases for continuing employees and
$43,000 of additional compensation expense recorded in accordance with
the provisions of SFAS 123R. There were 349 full-time equivalent
employees at June 30, 2006 compared to 317 at June 30, 2005.

o Occupancy and equipment expense increased $154,000 or 14.8% to
$1,198,000 from $1,044,000 due to an increase in occupancy expenses
for Mansfield, the new office location of Checkley and the Highland
branch facility that were opened in 2005.

o Expense for amortization of intangible assets increased $46,000 or
31.7% to $191,000 from $145,000 due to the additional core deposit
intangible amortization expense resulting from the acquisition of
Mansfield.

o Other operating expenses increased $72,000 or 6.7% to $1,146,000 in
2006 from $1,074,000 in 2005 due to increases in various expenses
including ATM and bankcard expenses.

o All other categories of operating expenses decreased a net of $107,000
or 13.0% to $718,000 from $825,000. The decrease was primarily due to
decreases in various professional fees.

Following are explanations for the six months ended June 30, 2006 compared to
the same period in 2005:

o Salaries and employee benefits, the largest component of other
expense, increased $567,000 or 8.2% to $7,447,000 from $6,880,000.
This increase is due to additional expense as a result of the
acquisition of Mansfield, merit increases for continuing employees and
$92,000 of additional compensation expense recorded in accordance with
the provisions of SFAS 123R. There were 349 full-time equivalent
employees at June 30, 2006 compared to 317 at June 30, 2005.

o Occupancy and equipment expense increased $254,000 or 12.2% to
$2,334,000 from $2,080,000 due to an increase in occupancy expenses
for Mansfield, for the new office location of Checkley and the
Highland branch facility that were opened in 2005.

o Expense for amortization of intangible assets increased $42,000 or
14.6% to $329,000 from $287,000 due to the additional core deposit
intangible amortization expense resulting from the acquisition of
Mansfield.

o Other operating expenses increased $160,000 or 7.7% to $2,240,000 in
2006 from $2,080,000 in 2005 due to increases in various expenses
including ATM and bankcard expenses.

o All other categories of operating expenses decreased a net of $157,000
or 10.7% to $1,316,000 from $1,473,000. The decrease was primarily due
to decreases in various professional fees.


Income Taxes

Total income tax expense amounted to $2,457,000 (33.3% effective tax rate) for
the six months ended June 30, 2006, compared to $2,607,000 (35.2% effective tax
rate) for the same period in 2005. The change in the effective tax rate in 2006
is due to a $142,000 reduction in the state tax expense accrual as a result of
amending the 2004 state income tax return for a greater deduction in enterprise
zone interest filed during the first quarter of 2006. This resulted in a $92,000
net reduction in tax expense. Additional reduction in state tax expense for 2006
resulted from an increase in deductible enterprise zone loans.
Analysis of Balance Sheets

Loans

The loan portfolio (net of unearned interest) is the largest category of the
Company's earning assets. The following table summarizes the composition of the
loan portfolio, including loans held for sale, as of June 30, 2006 and December
31, 2005 (in thousands):


June 30, December 31,
2006 2005
---------------- --------------
Real estate - residential $148,359 $117,204
Real estate - agricultural 57,114 50,730
Real estate - commercial 299,511 282,501
---------------- --------------
Total real estate - mortgage 504,984 450,435
Commercial and agricultural 167,478 150,598
Installment 41,568 34,385
Other 4,156 2,715
--------------- ---------------
Total loans $718,186 $638,133
================ ==============


Overall loans increased $80.1 million, or 12.5%. The acquisition of Mansfield
resulted in an increase of approximately $55.8 million in overall loans. The
remaining increase was primarily a result of an increase in residential and
commercial real estate loans. Total real estate mortgage loans have averaged
approximately 71% of the Company's total loan portfolio for the past several
years. This is the result of the Company's focus on commercial real estate
lending and long-term commitment to residential real estate lending. The balance
of real estate loans held for sale amounted to $2,653,000 and $1,778,000 as of
June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively.

At June 30, 2006, the Company had loan concentrations in agricultural industries
of $93.9 million, or 13%, of outstanding loans and $92.3 million, or 14.5%, at
December 31, 2005. In addition, the Company had loan concentrations in the
following industries as of June 30, 2006 compared to December 31, 2005 (dollars
in thousands):


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
June 30, 2006 December 31, 2005
Principal % Outstanding Principal % Outstanding
balance loans Balance loans
---------------- --------------- ----------------- ---------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Operators of non-residential $28,500 3.97% $22,446 3.52%
buildings
Apartment building owners 35,414 4.93% 40,843 6.40%
Motels, hotels & tourist courts 28,920 4.03% 28,054 4.40%
Subdividers & developers 27,923 3.89% 26,397 4.14%
</TABLE>


The Company had no further loan concentrations in excess of 25% of total
risk-based capital.

The following table presents the balance of loans outstanding as of June 30,
2006, by maturities (in thousands):


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Maturity (1)
Over 1
One year through Over
or less (2) 5 years 5 years Total
----------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Real estate - residential $ 61,213 $ 70,521 $ 16,625 $148,359
Real estate - agricultural 12,738 36,572 7,804 57,114
Real estate - commercial 71,937 204,007 23,567 299,511
----------------------------------------------------------------
Total real estate - mortgage 145,888 311,100 47,996 504,984
Commercial and agricultural 112,684 51,281 3,513 167,478
Installment 20,321 20,960 287 41,568
Other 926 2,206 1,024 4,156
----------------------------------------------------------------
Total loans $279,819 $385,547 $ 52,820 $718,186
================================================================
</TABLE>

(1) Based on scheduled principal repayments.

(2) Includes demand loans, past due loans and overdrafts.


As of June 30, 2006, loans with maturities over one year consisted of
approximately $363 million fixed rate loans and $75 million in variable rate
loans. The loan maturities noted above are based on the contractual provisions
of the individual loans. Rollovers and borrower requests are handled on a
case-by-case basis.

Nonperforming Loans

Nonperforming loans are defined as: (a) loans accounted for on a nonaccrual
basis; (b) accruing loans contractually past due ninety days or more as to
interest or principal payments; and (c) loans not included in (a) and (b) above
which are defined as "renegotiated loans". The Company's policy is to cease
accrual of interest on all loans that become ninety days past due as to
principal or interest. Nonaccrual loans are returned to accrual status when, in
the opinion of management, the financial position of the borrower indicates
there is no longer any reasonable doubt as to the timely collection of interest
or principal.

The following table presents information concerning the aggregate amount of
nonperforming loans at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 (in thousands):



June 30, December 31,
2006 2005
--------------- --------------
Nonaccrual loans $3,660 $3,458
Renegotiated loans which are performing
in accordance with revised terms - -
--------------- --------------
Total nonperforming loans $3,660 $3,458
=============== ==============


The $202,000 increase in nonaccrual loans during the six months ended June 30,
2006 resulted from the net of $180,000 of loans added to nonaccrual through
acquisition of Mansfield, $1,201,000 of additional loans put on nonaccrual
status, $882,000 of loans brought current or paid-off, $127,000 of loans
transferred to other real estate owned and $170,000 of loans charged-off.

Interest income that would have been reported if nonaccrual and renegotiated
loans had been performing totaled $73,000 and $60,000 for the periods ended June
30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

Loan Quality and Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses represents management's estimate of the reserve
necessary to adequately account for probable losses that could ultimately be
realized from current loan exposures. The provision for loan losses is the
charge against current earnings that is determined by management as the amount
needed to maintain an adequate allowance for loan losses. In determining the
adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, and therefore the provision to be
charged to current earnings, management relies predominantly on a disciplined
credit review and approval process that extends to the full range of the
Company's credit exposure. The review process is directed by overall lending
policy and is intended to identify, at the earliest possible stage, borrowers
who might be facing financial difficulty. Once identified, the magnitude of
exposure to individual borrowers is quantified in the form of specific
allocations of the allowance for loan losses. Management considers collateral
values and guarantees in the determination of such specific allocations.
Additional factors considered by management in evaluating the overall adequacy
of the allowance include historical net loan losses, the level and composition
of nonaccrual, past due and renegotiated loans, trends in volumes and terms of
loans, effects of changes in risk selection and underwriting standards or
lending practices, lending staff changes, concentrations of credit, industry
conditions and the current economic conditions in the region where the Company
operates. Management considers the allowance for loan losses a critical
accounting policy.

Management recognizes there are risk factors that are inherent in the Company's
loan portfolio. All financial institutions face risk factors in their loan
portfolios because risk exposure is a function of the business. The Company's
operations (and therefore its loans) are concentrated in east central Illinois,
an area where agriculture is the dominant industry. Accordingly, lending and
other business relationships with agriculture-based businesses are critical to
the Company's success. At June 30, 2006, the Company's loan portfolio included
$93.9 million of loans to borrowers whose businesses are directly related to
agriculture. The balance increased $1.6 million from $92.3 million at December
31, 2005. While the Company adheres to sound underwriting practices, including
collateralization of loans, any extended period of low commodity prices,
significantly reduced yields on crops and/or reduced levels of government
assistance to the agricultural industry could result in an increase in the level
of problem agriculture loans and potentially result in loan losses within the
agricultural portfolio.

In addition, the Company has $28.9 million of loans to motels, hotels and
tourist courts. The performance of these loans is dependent on borrower specific
issues as well as the general level of business and personal travel within the
region. While the Company adheres to sound underwriting standards, a prolonged
period of reduced business or personal travel could result in an increase in
non-performing loans to this business segment and potentially in loan losses.
The Company also has $28.5 million of loans to operators of non-residential
buildings, $35.4 million of loans to apartment building owners and $27.9 million
of loans to subdividers and developers. A significant widespread decline in real
estate values could result in an increase in non-performing loans to this
segment and potentially in loan losses. Analysis of the allowance for loan
losses as of June 30, 2006 and 2005, and of changes in the allowance for the
three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, is as follows
(dollars in thousands):

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Three months ended June 30, Six months ended June 30,
2006 2005 2006 2005
---------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Average loans outstanding, net of unearned income $687,923 $604,329 $661,783 $596,951
Allowance-beginning of period $ 4,729 $ 4,737 $ 4,648 $ 4,621
Allowance of Mansfield acquired in business
combination 1,405 - 1,405
Charge-offs:
Real estate-mortgage 24 130 48 130
Commercial, financial & agricultural 60 21 183 118
Installment 23 39 27 89
Other 45 23 75 23
---------------------------------------------------------------
Total charge-offs 152 213 333 360
Recoveries:
Real estate-mortgage 2 - 4 -
Commercial, financial & agricultural - 5 21 66
Installment 4 5 14 20
Other 24 3 60 3
---------------------------------------------------------------
Total recoveries 30 13 99 89
---------------------------------------------------------------
Net charge-offs (recoveries) 122 200 234 271
Provision for loan losses 211 150 404 337
---------------------------------------------------------------
Allowance-end of period $ 6,223 $ 4,687 $ 6,223 $ 4,687
===============================================================
Ratio of annualized net charge-offs
to average loans .07% .13% .07% .09%
===============================================================
Ratio of allowance for loan losses to
loans outstanding(less unearned interest
at end of period) .87% .76% .87% .76%
===============================================================
Ratio of allowance for loan losses to
nonperforming loans 170.0% 126.6% 170.0% 126.6%
===============================================================
</TABLE>

During the first six months of 2006, the Company had charge-offs of $142,000 on
commercial loans of two borrowers. During the first six months of 2005, the
Company had charge-offs of $53,000 on two agricultural loans of a single
borrower and a charge-off of $44,000 on a commercial loan of a single borrower
and a charge-off of $113,000 on a loan secured by residential real estate of a
single borrower.

The Company minimizes credit risk by adhering to sound underwriting and credit
review policies. Management and the board of directors of the Company review
these policies at least annually. Senior management is actively involved in
business development efforts and the maintenance and monitoring of credit
underwriting and approval. The loan review system and controls are designed to
identify, monitor and address asset quality problems in an accurate and timely
manner. On a quarterly basis, the board of directors and management review the
status of problem loans and determine a best estimate of the allowance. In
addition to internal policies and controls, regulatory authorities periodically
review asset quality and the overall adequacy of the allowance for loan losses.

Securities

The Company's overall investment objectives are to insulate the investment
portfolio from undue credit risk, maintain adequate liquidity, insulate capital
against changes in market value and control excessive changes in earnings while
optimizing investment performance. The types and maturities of securities
purchased are primarily based on the Company's current and projected liquidity
and interest rate sensitivity positions.

The following table sets forth the amortized cost of the securities as of June
30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 (dollars in thousands):


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
June 30, 2006 December 31, 2005
----------------------------- ---------------------------
Weighted Weighted
Amortized Average Amortized Average
Cost Yield Cost Yield
-------------- -------------- ------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of
U.S. government corporations and agencies $137,250 4.62% $108,506 3.74%
Obligations of states and political 20,568 4.30% 16,829 4.54%
subdivisions
Mortgage-backed securities 25,061 4.86% 20,046 4.34%
Other securities 12,965 6.35% 13,083 6.21%
-------------- -------------- ------------- -------------
Total securities $195,844 4.73% $158,464 4.10%
============== ============== ============= =============
</TABLE>


At June 30, 2006, the Company's investment portfolio showed an increase of $37.4
million from 2005 due to securities acquired in the acquisition of Mansfield
offset by various securities that matured during the first quarter of 2006 and
were not immediately replaced. The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and
losses and estimated fair values for available-for-sale and held-to-maturity
securities by major security type at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 were as
follows (in thousands):


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Gross Gross Estimated
Amortized Unrealized Unrealized Fair
Cost Gains (Losses) Value
----------- ----------- ------------ ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
June 30, 2006
Available-for-sale:
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations
of U.S. government corporations & agencies $137,250 $ - $(2,331) $134,919
Obligations of states and political subdivisions 19,225 149 (135) 19,239
Mortgage-backed securities 25,061 19 (793) 24,287
Federal Home Loan Bank stock 4,523 - - 4,523
Other securities 8,442 465 (1) 8,906
----------- ----------- ------------ ----------
Total available-for-sale $194,501 $ 633 $(3,260) $191,874
=========== =========== ============ ==========
Held-to-maturity:
Obligations of states and political subdivisions $ 1,343 $ 21 $ - $1,364
=========== =========== ============ ==========

December 31, 2005
Available-for-sale:
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations
of U.S. government corporations & agencies $ 108,506 $ 31 $(1,500) $ 107,037
Obligations of states and political subdivisions 15,417 239 (50) 15,606
Mortgage-backed securities 20,046 25 (442) 19,629
Federal Home Loan Bank stock 5,557 - - 5,557
Other securities 7,526 486 - 8,012
----------- ----------- ------------ ----------
Total available-for-sale $157,052 $ 781 $(1,992) $155,841
=========== =========== ============ ==========
Held-to-maturity:
Obligations of states and political subdivisions $ 1,412 $ 30 $ - $ 1,442
=========== =========== ============ ==========
</TABLE>


At June 30, 2006, there were six mortgage-backed securities with a fair value of
$15,004,000 and an unrealized loss of $687,000, and eight obligations of U.S.
government agencies with a fair value of $43,568,000 and an unrealized loss of
$1,349,000, in a continuous unrealized loss position for twelve months or more.
At June 30, 2005, there was one mortgage-backed security with a fair value of
$2,730,000 and an unrealized loss of $26,000, and five obligations of U.S.
government agencies with a fair value of $21,369,000 and an unrealized loss of
$276,000, in a continuous unrealized loss position for twelve months or more.
This position is due to short-term and intermediate rates increasing since the
purchase of these securities resulting in the market value of the security being
lower than book value. Management does not believe any individual unrealized
loss as of June 30, 2006 or December 31, 2005 represents an other than temporary
impairment.

The following table indicates the expected maturities of investment securities
classified as available-for-sale and held-to-maturity, presented at amortized
cost, at June 30, 2006 and the weighted average yield for each range of
maturities. Mortgage-backed securities are included based on their weighted
average life. All other securities are shown at their contractual maturity
(dollars in thousands).


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
One year After 1 through After 5 through After ten
or less 5 years 10 years years Total
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Available-for-sale:
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of
U.S. government corporations and agencies $19,420 $ 94,261 $23,569 $ - $137,250
Obligations of state and
political subdivisions 1,989 7,447 6,215 3,574 19,225
Mortgage-backed securities 949 16,643 7,469 - 25,061
Federal Home Loan Bank stock - - - 4,523 4,523
Other securities 500 - 2,500 5,442 8,442
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total investments $22,858 $118,351 $39,753 $13,539 $194,501
================================================================================
Weighted average yield 4.26% 4.53% 5.25% 5.69% 4.72%
Full tax-equivalent yield 4.44% 4.65% 5.55% 6.21% 4.91%
================================================================================
Held-to-maturity:
Obligations of state and
political subdivisions $ 145 $ 505 $ 191 $ 502 $ 1,343
================================================================================
Weighted average yield 5.36% 5.54% 5.48% 5.35% 5.44%
Full tax-equivalent yield 7.89% 8.16% 7.82% 7.88% 7.98%
================================================================================
</TABLE>

The weighted average yields are calculated on the basis of the amortized cost
and effective yields weighted for the scheduled maturity of each security.
Tax-equivalent yields have been calculated using a 34% tax rate. With the
exception of obligations of the U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government agencies
and corporations, there were no investment securities of any single issuer, the
book value of which exceeded 10% of stockholders' equity at June 30, 2006.

Investment securities carried at approximately $133,354,000 and $136,787,000 at
June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively, were pledged to secure public
deposits and repurchase agreements and for other purposes as permitted or
required by law.

Deposits

Funding of the Company's earning assets is substantially provided by a
combination of consumer, commercial and public fund deposits. The Company
continues to focus its strategies and emphasis on retail core deposits, the
major component of funding sources. The following table sets forth the average
deposits and weighted average rates for the three months ended June 30, 2006 and
for the year ended December 31, 2005 (dollars in thousands):


June 30, 2006 December 31, 2005
-----------------------------------------------------
Weighted Weighted
Average Average Average Average
Balance Rate Balance Rate
-----------------------------------------------------
Demand deposits:
Non-interest-bearing $ 98,897 - $ 89,593 -
Interest-bearing 233,133 1.91% 229,532 1.30%
Savings 61,252 .47% 59,830 .41%
Time deposits 298,978 3.69% 271,161 3.13%
-----------------------------------------------------
Total average deposits $692,260 2.28% $650,116 1.80%
=====================================================


June 30, December 31,
(dollars in thousands) 2006 2005
------------------------------------------ --------------- --------------
High month-end balances of total deposits $788,122 $677,872
Low month-end balances of total deposits 651,392 627,107


The following table sets forth the maturity of time deposits of $100,000 or more
at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 (in thousands):


June 30, December 31,
2006 2005
----------------------------
3 months or less $35,547 $ 15,947
Over 3 through 6 months 39,623 23,593
Over 6 through 12 months 22,425 34,944
Over 12 months 39,274 28,950
----------------------------
Total $136,869 $103,434
============================


During the first six months of 2006, the balance of time deposits of $100,000 or
more increased by approximately $33.4 million. The increase in balances was
primarily attributable to time deposits acquired in the acquisition of
Mansfield, an increase in brokered CD balances and to a promotion run in the
first quarter of 2006.

Balances of time deposits of $100,000 or more include brokered CDs, time
deposits maintained for public fund entities, and consumer time deposits. The
balance of brokered CDs was $46.1 million and $38.4 million as of June 30, 2006
and December 31, 2005, respectively. The Company also maintained time deposits
for the State of Illinois with balances of $3.1 million and $3.4 million as of
June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively. The State of Illinois
deposits are subject to bid annually and could increase or decrease in any given
year.

Repurchase Agreements and Other Borrowings

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase are short-term obligations of
First Mid Bank. First Mid Bank collateralizes these obligations with certain
government securities that are direct obligations of the United States or one of
its agencies. First Mid Bank offers these retail repurchase agreements as a cash
management service to its corporate customers. Other borrowings consist of
Federal Home Loan Bank ("FHLB") advances, federal funds purchased and loans
(short-term or long-term debt) that the Company has outstanding and junior
subordinated debentures.

Information relating to securities sold under agreements to repurchase and other
borrowings as of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 is presented below (dollars
in thousands):

June 30, December 31,
2006 2005
-------------- -------------
Federal funds purchased $ 4,000 $ 4,000
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase 52,578 67,380
Federal Home Loan Bank advances:
Overnight 1,000 12,000
Fixed term - due in one year or less 7,000 3,000
Fixed term - due after one year 23,000 20,000
Debt:
Loans due in one year or less - 5,500
Loans due after one year 15,000 -
Junior subordinated debentures 20,620 10,310
-------------- -------------
Total $123,198 $122,190
============== =============
Average interest rate at end of period 4.79% 4.27%

Maximum outstanding at any month-end
Federal funds purchased $ 4,000 $ 4,000
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase 56,536 67,380
Federal Home Loan Bank advances:
Overnight 19,500 12,014
Fixed term - due in one year or less 7,000 20,000
Fixed term - due after one year 30,000 20,000
Debt:
Loans due in one year or less 4,500 6,200
Loans due after one year 15,000 200
Junior subordinated debentures 20,620 10,310

Averages for the period (YTD)
Federal funds purchased $ 5,851 $ 874
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase 50,906 57,799
Federal Home Loan Bank advances:
Overnight 11,647 2,447
Fixed term - due in one year or less 5,000 13,575
Fixed term - due after one year 25,674 15,523
Debt:
Loans due in one year or less 2,005 5,607
Loans due after one year 5,387 104
Junior subordinated debentures 14,069 10,310
-------------- -------------
Total $ 120,539 $106,239
============== =============
Average interest rate during the period 4.61% 3.74%


FHLB advances represent borrowings by First Mid Bank to economically fund loan
demand. The fixed term advances consist of $30 million as follows:

o $7 million advance at 4.00% with a 2-year maturity, due April 15, 2007
o $5 million advance at 4.58% with a 5-year maturity, due March 22, 2010
o $5 million advance at 4.00% with a 5-year maturity, due January 5,
2011
o $5 million advance at 4.03% with a 5-year maturity, due January 20,
2011
o $3 million advance at 5.98% with a 10-year maturity, due March 1,
2011, callable quarterly
o $5 million advance at 4.33% with a 10-year maturity, due November 23,
2011, five year lockout, one time call November 23, 2006

At June 30, 2006, outstanding debt balances include $15,000,000 on a revolving
credit agreement with The Northern Trust Company. This loan was renegotiated on
April 24, 2006 in conjunction with obtaining financing for the acquisition of
Mansfield. The revolving credit agreement has a maximum available balance of
$22.5 million with a term of 3 years from the date of closing. The interest rate
(6.27% as of June 30, 2006) is floating at 1.25% over the federal funds rate
when the ratio of senior debt to Tier 1 capital is equal to or below 35% as of
the end of the previous quarter and 1.50% over the federal funds rate when the
ratio of senior debt to Tier 1 capital is above 35%. The loan is secured by the
common stock of First Mid Bank and subject to a borrowing agreement containing
requirements for the Company and First Mid Bank similar to those of the prior
agreement including requirements for operating and capital ratios. The Company
and is subsidiary banks were in compliance with the existing covenants at June
30, 2006 and 2005 and December 31, 2005.

On February 27, 2004, the Company completed the issuance and sale of $10 million
of floating rate trust preferred securities through First Mid-Illinois Statutory
Trust I ("Trust I"), a statutory business trust and wholly-owned unconsolidated
subsidiary of the Company, as part of a pooled offering. The Company established
Trust I for the purpose of issuing the trust preferred securities. The $10
million in proceeds from the trust preferred issuance and an additional $310,000
for the Company's investment in common equity of Trust I, a total of $10,310
000, was invested in junior subordinated debentures of the Company. The
underlying junior subordinated debentures issued by the Company to Trust I
mature in 2034, bear interest at nine-month London Interbank Offered Rate
("LIBOR") plus 280 basis points, reset quarterly, and are callable, at the
option of the Company, at par on or after April 7, 2009 (7.87% and 6.95% at June
30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively).The Company used the proceeds of
the offering for general corporate purposes.

On April 26, 2006, the Company completed the issuance and sale of $10 million of
fixed/floating rate trust preferred securities through First Mid-Illinois
Statutory Trust II ("Trust II"), a statutory business trust and wholly-owned
unconsolidated subsidiary of the Company, as part of a pooled offering. The
Company established Trust II for the purpose of issuing the trust preferred
securities. The $10 million in proceeds from the trust preferred issuance and an
additional $310,000 for the Company's investment in common equity of Trust II, a
total of $10,310 000, was invested in junior subordinated debentures of the
Company. The underlying junior subordinated debentures issued by the Company to
Trust II mature in 2036, bear interest at a fixed rate of 6.98% (three-month
LIBOR plus 160 basis points) paid quarterly and converts to floating rate (LIBOR
plus 160 basis points) after June 15, 2011. The net proceeds to the Company were
used for general corporate purposes, including the Company's acquisition of
Mansfield.

The trust preferred securities issued by Trust I and Trust II are included as
Tier 1 capital of the Company for regulatory capital purposes. On March 1, 2005,
the Federal Reserve Board adopted a final rule that allows the continued limited
inclusion of trust preferred securities in the calculation of Tier 1 capital for
regulatory purposes. The final rule provides a five-year transition period,
ending June 30, 2009, for application of the quantitative limits. The Company
does not expect the application of the quantitative limits to have a significant
impact on its calculation of Tier 1 capital for regulatory purposes or its
classification as well-capitalized.


Interest Rate Sensitivity

The Company seeks to maximize its net interest margin while maintaining an
acceptable level of interest rate risk. Interest rate risk can be defined as the
amount of forecasted net interest income that may be gained or lost due to
changes in the interest rate environment, a variable over which management has
no control. Interest rate risk, or sensitivity, arises when the maturity or
repricing characteristics of interest-bearing assets differ significantly from
the maturity or repricing characteristics of interest-bearing liabilities.

The Company monitors its interest rate sensitivity position to maintain a
balance between rate sensitive assets and rate sensitive liabilities. This
balance serves to limit the adverse effects of changes in interest rates. The
Company's asset liability management committee (ALCO) oversees the interest rate
sensitivity position and directs the overall allocation of funds.

In the banking industry, a traditional way to measure potential net interest
income exposure to changes in interest rates is through a technique known as
"static GAP" analysis which measures the cumulative differences between the
amounts of assets and liabilities maturing or repricing at various intervals. By
comparing the volumes of interest-bearing assets and liabilities that have
contractual maturities and repricing points at various times in the future,
management can gain insight into the amount of interest rate risk embedded in
the balance sheet.

The following table sets forth the Company's interest rate repricing GAP for
selected maturity periods at June 30, 2006 (dollars in thousands):

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Rate Sensitive Within
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fair
1 year 1-2 years 2-3 years 3-4 years 4-5 years Thereafter Total Value
----------- ------------ ------------ ----------- ----------- ------------ ---------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Interest-earning assets:
Federal funds sold and other
interest-bearing deposits $ 2,408 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,408 $ 2,408
Taxable investment securities 25,456 35,184 23,704 15,489 18,087 54,716 172,636 172,636
Nontaxable investment
securities 2,139 2,067 1,983 2,284 1,646 10,462 20,581 20,603
Loans 322,271 115,620 139,777 70,303 45,977 24,238 718,186 699,270
----------- ------------ ------------ ----------- ----------- ------------ ---------- -----------
Total $352,274 $152,871 $165,464 $88,076 $65,710 $89,416 $913,811 $894,917
=========== ============ ============ =========== =========== ============ ========== ===========
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Savings and N.O.W. accounts $ 35,370 $ 11,988 $ 12,515 $ 18,311 $ 18,935 $113,565 $210,684 $214,691
Money market accounts 72,109 2,503 2,573 3,338 3,407 18,010 101,940 103,167
Other time deposits 211,711 119,416 8,161 7,432 7,606 329 354,655 353,128
Short-term borrowings/debt 79,578 - - - - - 79,578 75,357
Long-term borrowings/debt - - 15,000 5,000 23,620 - 43,620 43,701
----------- ------------ ------------ ----------- ----------- ------------ ---------- -----------
Total $398,768 $133,907 $38,249 $34,081 $ 53,568 $ 131,904 $790,477 $790,044
=========== ============ ============ =========== =========== ============ ========== ===========
Rate sensitive assets -
rate sensitive liabilities $(46,494) $ 18,964 $ 127,215 $53,995 $ 12,142 $(42,488) $123,334
Cumulative GAP $(46,494) $(27,530) $ 99,685 $153,680 $165,822 $123,334

Cumulative amounts as % of
total rate sensitive assets -5.1% 2.1% 13.9% 5.9% 1.3% -4.6%
Cumulative Ratio -5.1% -3.0% 10.9% 16.8% 18.1% 13.5%
</TABLE>


The static GAP analysis shows that at June 30, 2006, the Company was liability
sensitive, on a cumulative basis, through the twelve-month time horizon. This
indicates that future increases in interest rates, if any, could have an adverse
effect on net interest income. Conversely, future decreases in interest rates
could have a positive effect on net interest income.

There are several ways the Company measures and manages the exposure to interest
rate sensitivity, including static GAP analysis. The Company's ALCO also uses
other financial models to project interest income under various rate scenarios
and prepayment/extension assumptions consistent with First Mid Bank's historical
experience and with known industry trends. ALCO meets at least monthly to review
the Company's exposure to interest rate changes as indicated by the various
techniques and to make necessary changes in the composition terms and/or rates
of the assets and liabilities. Based on all information available, management
does not believe that changes in interest rates, which might reasonably be
expected to occur in the next twelve months, will have a material adverse effect
on the Company's net interest income.

Capital Resources

At June 30, 2006, the Company's stockholders' equity had increased $166,000 or
..2% to $72,492,000 from $72,326,000 as of December 31, 2005. During the first
six months of 2006, net income contributed $4,926,000 to equity before the
payment of dividends to common stockholders. The change in market value of
available-for-sale investment securities decreased stockholders' equity by
$864,000, net of tax. Additional purchases of treasury stock (103,019 shares at
an average cost of $41.14 per share) decreased stockholders' equity by
approximately $4,238,000.

The Company is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered
by the federal banking agencies. Bank holding companies follow minimum
regulatory requirements established by the Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System ("Federal Reserve System"), and First Mid Bank follows similar
minimum regulatory requirements established for national banks by the Office of
the Comptroller of the Currency ("OCC"). Failure to meet minimum capital
requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional
discretionary action by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct
material effect on the Company's financial statements.

Quantitative measures established by each regulatory agency to ensure capital
adequacy require the reporting institutions to maintain a minimum total
risk-based capital ratio of 8% and a minimum leverage ratio of 3% for the most
highly rated banks that do not expect significant growth. All other institutions
are required to maintain a minimum leverage ratio of 4%. Management believes
that, as of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, the Company and First Mid Bank
met all capital adequacy requirements.

The trust preferred securities issued by Trust I and Trust II are included as
Tier 1 capital of the Company for regulatory capital purposes. On March 1, 2005,
the Federal Reserve Board adopted a final rule that allows the continued limited
inclusion of trust preferred securities in the calculation of Tier 1 capital for
regulatory purposes. The final rule provides a five-year transition period,
ending June 30, 2009, for application of the quantitative limits. The Company
does not expect the application of the quantitative limits to have a significant
impact on its calculation of Tier 1 capital for regulatory purposes or its
classification as well-capitalized.

As of June 30, 2006, First Mid Bank had capital ratios that qualified it for
treatment as well-capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt
corrective action. To be categorized as well-capitalized, minimum total
risk-based, Tier 1 risk-based and Tier 1 leverage ratios must be maintained as
set forth in the following table (dollars in thousands).


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
To Be Well-
Capitalized Under
For Capital Prompt Corrective
Actual Adequacy Purposes Action Provisions
-------------------------- ------------------------- -------------------------
Amount Ratio Amount Ratio Amount Ratio
------------- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
June 30, 2006
Total Capital (to risk-weighted assets)
Company $76,840 10.49% $58,583 > 8.00% N/A N/A
-
First Mid Bank 71,745 10.94% 52,475 > 8.00% $65,593 >10.00%
- -
Tier 1 Capital (to risk-weighted assets)
Company 71,149 9.72% 29,292 > 4.00% N/A N/A
-
First Mid Bank 66,947 10.21% 26,237 > 4.00% 39,356 > 6.00%
- -
Tier 1 Capital (to average assets)
Company 71,149 7.72% 36,880 > 4.00% N/A N/A
-
First Mid Bank 66,947 8.03% 33,331 > 4.00% 41,664 > 5.00%
- -
December 31, 2005
Total Capital (to risk-weighted assets)
Company $75,901 11.87% $ 51,163 > 8.00% N/A N/A
-
First Mid Bank 73,913 11.66 50,726 > 8.00% $63,407 >10.00%
- -
Tier 1 Capital (to risk-weighted assets)
Company 71,253 11.14 25,581 > 4.00% N/A N/A
-
First Mid Bank 69,265 10.92 25,363 > 4.00% 38,044 > 6.00%
- -
Tier 1 Capital (to average assets)
Company 71,253 8.55 33,330 > 4.00% N/A N/A
-
First Mid Bank 69,265 8.36 33,152 > 4.00% 41,440 > 5.00%
- -
</TABLE>


Banks and financial holding companies are expected to operate at or above the
minimum capital requirements. These ratios are in excess of regulatory minimums
and allow the Company to operate without capital adequacy concerns. The Company
expects to continue to have capital ratios meeting regulatory requirements for
treatment as well-capitalized following the acquisition of Mansfield Bancorp,
Inc.


Stock Plans

Participants may purchase Company stock under the following four plans of the
Company: the Deferred Compensation Plan, the First Retirement and Savings Plan,
the Dividend Reinvestment Plan, and the Stock Incentive Plan. For more detailed
information on these plans, refer to the Company's 2005 Annual Report on Form
10-K.

On August 5, 1998, the Company announced a stock repurchase program for up to 3%
of its common stock. In March 2000, the Board of directors approved the
repurchase of an additional 5% of the Company's common stock. In September 2001,
the Board of directors approved the repurchase of $3 million of additional
shares of the Company's common stock and in August 2002, the Board of directors
approved the repurchase of $5 million of additional shares of the Company's
common stock. In September 2003, the Board of directors approved the repurchase
of $10 million of additional shares of the Company's common stock. On April 27,
2004, the Board of directors approved the repurchase of an additional $5 million
shares of the Company's common stock. On August 23, 2005 the Board of directors
approved the repurchase of an additional $5 million shares of the Company's
common stock, bringing the aggregate total on June 30, 2006 to 8% of the
Company's common stock plus $28 million of additional shares.

During the six-month period ending June 30, 2006, the Company repurchased
103,019 shares at a total cost of approximately $4,238,000. Since 1998, the
Company has repurchased a total of 1,339,878 shares at a total price of
approximately $33,989,000. As of June 30, 2006, the Company was authorized per
all repurchase programs to purchase $218,000 in additional shares.


Liquidity

Liquidity represents the ability of the Company and its subsidiaries to meet all
present and future financial obligations arising in the daily operations of the
business. Financial obligations consist of the need for funds to meet extensions
of credit, deposit withdrawals and debt servicing. The Company's liquidity
management focuses on the ability to obtain funds economically through assets
that may be converted into cash at minimal costs or through other sources. The
Company's other sources of cash include overnight federal fund lines, Federal
Home Loan Bank advances, deposits of the State of Illinois, the ability to
borrow at the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, and the Company's operating line
of credit with The Northern Trust Company. Details for the sources include:

o First Mid Bank has $22.5 million available in overnight federal fund
lines, including $10 million from Harris Trust and Savings Bank of
Chicago and $12.5 million from The Northern Trust Company.
Availability of the funds is subject to First Mid Bank meeting minimum
regulatory capital requirements for total capital to risk-weighted
assets and Tier 1 capital to total average assets. As of June 30,
2006, First Mid Bank's ratios of total capital to risk-weighted assets
of 10.94% and Tier 1 capital to total average assets of 8.03% met
regulatory requirements. Peoples State Bank also has $1 million
available in overnight federal funds from Illinois Bankers' Bank.

o First Mid Bank and Peoples can also borrow from the Federal Home Loan
Bank as a source of liquidity. Availability of the funds is subject to
the pledging of collateral to the Federal Home Loan Bank. Collateral
that can be pledged includes one-to-four family residential real
estate loans and securities. At June 30, 2006, the excess collateral
at the Federal Home Loan Bank will support approximately $73.5 million
and $11 million, for First Mid Bank and Peoples respectively, of
additional advances.

o First Mid Bank also receives deposits from the State of Illinois. The
receipt of these funds is subject to competitive bid and requires
collateral to be pledged at the time of placement.

o First Mid Bank and Peoples State Bank are also members of the Federal
Reserve System and can borrow funds provided that sufficient
collateral is pledged.

o In addition, as of June 30, 2006, the Company had a revolving credit
agreement in the amount of $22.5 million with The Northern Trust
Company with an outstanding balance of $15,000,000 and $7,500,000 in
available funds.


Management monitors its expected liquidity requirements carefully, focusing
primarily on cash flows from:

o lending activities, including loan commitments, letters of credit and
mortgage prepayment assumptions;

o deposit activities, including seasonal demand of private and public
funds;

o investing activities, including prepayments of mortgage-backed
securities and call provisions on U.S. treasury and government agency
securities; and

o operating activities, including scheduled debt repayments and
dividends to stockholders.


The following table summarizes significant contractual obligations and other
commitments at June 30, 2006 (in thousands):



Less than More than
Total 1 year 1-3 years 3-5 years 5 years
---------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------
Time deposits
$354,655 $211,657 $127,631 $15,038 $ 329
Debt 35,620 - 15,000 - 20,620
Other borrowings 83,578 60,578 - 18,000 5,000
Operating leases 3,951 432 844 783 1,892
Supplemental retirement 782 50 100 100 532
---------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------
$478,586 $272,717 $ 143,575 $33,921 $28,373
========== =========== =========== =========== ==========


For the six-month period ended June 30, 2006, net cash of $6.0 million and $18.9
million was provided from operating activities and financing activities,
respectively, while investing activities used net cash of $20.6 million. In
total, cash and cash equivalents increased by $4.3 million since year-end 2005.

The Company has also issued $10 million of floating rate trust preferred
securities through each of Trust I and Trust II. See heading "Repurchase
Agreements and Other Borrowings" for a more detailed description.


Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

First Mid Bank enters into financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in
the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers.
These financial instruments include lines of credit, letters of credit and other
commitments to extend credit. Each of these instruments involves, to varying
degrees, elements of credit, interest rate and liquidity risk in excess of the
amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets. The Company uses the same
credit policies and requires similar collateral in approving lines of credit and
commitments and issuing letters of credit as it does in making loans. The
exposure to credit losses on financial instruments is represented by the
contractual amount of these instruments. However, the Company does not
anticipate any losses from these instruments.

The off-balance sheet financial instruments whose contract amounts represent
credit risk at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 were as follows (in
thousands):

June 30, December 31,
2006 2005
-------------- --------------
Unused commitments, including lines of credit:
Commercial real estate $ 27,682 $ 28,745
Commercial operating 43,510 46,012
Home equity 17,592 16,160
Other 25,690 23,178
-------------- --------------
Total $114,474 $114,095
============== ==============
Standby letters of credit $ 4,281 $ 3,694
============== ==============


Commitments to originate credit represent approved commercial, residential real
estate and home equity loans that generally are expected to be funded within
ninety days. Lines of credit are agreements by which the Company agrees to
provide a borrowing accommodation up to a stated amount as long as there is no
violation of any condition established in the loan agreement. Both commitments
to originate credit and lines of credit generally have fixed expiration dates or
other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the
lines and some commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the
total amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.

Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Company to
guarantee the financial performance of customers to third parties. Standby
letters of credit are primarily issued to facilitate trade or support borrowing
arrangements and generally expire in one year or less. The credit risk involved
in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in
extending credit facilities to customers. The maximum amount of credit that
would be extended under letters of credit is equal to the total off-balance
sheet contract amount of such instrument.


ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

There has been no material change in the market risk faced by the Company since
December 31, 2005. For information regarding the Company's market risk, refer to
the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.


ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

The Company's management, with the participation of the Company's Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of
the Company's "disclosure controls and procedures" (as such term is defined in
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the "Exchange Act")), as of the end of the period covered by this
report. Based on such evaluation, such officers have concluded that, as of the
end of the period covered by this report, the Company's disclosure controls and
procedures are effective in bringing to their attention on a timely basis
material information relating to the Company (including its consolidated
subsidiaries) required to be included in the Company's periodic filings under
the Exchange Act. Further, there have been no changes in the Company's internal
control over financial reporting during the last fiscal quarter that have
materially affected or that are reasonably likely to affect materially the
Company's internal control over financial reporting.
PART II

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Since First Mid Bank acts as a depository of funds, it is named from time to
time as a defendant in lawsuits (such as garnishment proceedings) involving
claims as to the ownership of funds in particular accounts. Management believes
that all such litigation as well as other pending legal proceedings in which the
Company is involved constitute ordinary, routine litigation incidental to the
business of the Company and that such litigation will not materially adversely
affect the Company's consolidated financial condition.


ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

Various risks and uncertainties, some of which are difficult to predict and
beyond the Company's control, could negatively impact the Company. As a
financial institution, the Company is exposed to interest rate risk, liquidity
risk, credit risk, operational risk, risks from economic or market conditions,
and general business risks among others. Adverse experience with these or other
risks could have a material impact on the Company's financial condition and
results of operations, as well as the value of its common stock. There has been
no material change to the risk factors described in the Company's Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.


ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(d) Approximate Dollar
(c) Total Number of Shares Value of Shares that
Purchased as Part of May Yet Be Purchased
(a) Total Number of (b) Average Price Publicly Announced Plans Under the Plans or
Period Shares Purchased Paid per Share or Programs Programs
- ---------------------- --------------------- ----------------------- ---------------------------- -------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
April 1, 2006 -
April 30, 2006 - - - $1,149,000
May 1, 2006 -
May 31, 2006 1,580 $40.93 1,580 $1,084,000
June 1, 2006 -
June 30, 2006 21,408 $40.48 21,408 $ 217,000
--------------------- ----------------------- ---------------------------- -------------------------
Total 22,988 $40.51 22,988 $217,000
===================== ======================= ============================ =========================
</TABLE>


See heading "Stock Plans" for more information regarding stock purchases.


ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.


ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

The Annual Meeting of Stockholders was held May 24, 2006. At the meeting, Joseph
R. Dively, Sara J. Preston, and William S. Rowland were elected to serve as
Class II directors with terms expiring in 2009. Continuing Class I directors
(terms expiring 2008) are Kenneth R. Diepholz, Steven L. Grissom, and Gary W.
Melvin and continuing Class III directors (terms expiring 2007) are Charles A.
Adams, Daniel E. Marvin, Jr. and Ray Anthony Sparks.

There were 4,340,725 issued and outstanding shares of common stock at the time
of the Annual Meeting. The voting at the meeting, on the matter listed above,
was as follows:

Election of Directors:
For Withheld
Joseph R. Dively 3,790,817 19,327
Sara J. Preston 3,794,747 15,937
William S. Rowland 3,796,041 14,103



ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

None.


ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

The exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K and filed herewith are
listed in the Exhibit Index that follows the Signature Page and that immediately
precedes the exhibits filed.
SIGNATURES



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.




FIRST MID-ILLINOIS BANCSHARES, INC.
(Registrant)

Date: August 8, 2006


/s/ William S. Rowland

William S. Rowland
President and Chief Executive Officer


/s/ Michael L. Taylor

Michael L. Taylor
Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit Index to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
Exhibit
Number Description and Filing or Incorporation Reference
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4.1 The Registrant agrees to furnish to the Commission, upon request, a
copy of each instrument with respect to issues of long-term debt
involving a total amount which does not exceed 10% of the total
assets of the Registrant and its subsidiaries on a consolidated
basis

11.1 Statement re: Computation of Earnings Per Share
(Filed herewith on page 7)

31.1 Certification pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

31.2 Certification pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

32.1 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.2 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Exhibit 31.1
Certification pursuant to section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, William S. Rowland, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of First
Mid-Illinois Bancshares, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal
control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or
caused such internal control over financial reporting to be
designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting.


Date: August 8, 2006

By: /s/ William S. Rowland

William S. Rowland, President and
Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.2
Certification pursuant to section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


I, Michael L. Taylor, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of First Mid-Illinois
Bancshares, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal
control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or
caused such internal control over financial reporting to be
designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting.



Date: August 8, 2006

By: /s/ Michael L. Taylor

Michael L. Taylor, Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1




Certification pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Mid-Illinois Bancshares, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
William S. Rowland, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.







Date: August 8, 2006

/s/ William S. Rowland

William S. Rowland
President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2




Certification pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Mid-Illinois Bancshares, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Michael L. Taylor, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.







Date: August 8, 2006

/s/ Michael L. Taylor

Michael L. Taylor
Chief Financial Officer