Forrester Research
FORR
#9277
Rank
$0.10 B
Marketcap
$5.48
Share price
1.67%
Change (1 day)
-40.56%
Change (1 year)

Forrester Research - 10-K annual report


Text size:
 
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 
 
Form 10-K
   
(Mark One)  
 
þ
 ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
  For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009
or
o
 TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
  For the transition period from          to          
 
Commission File Number000-21433
 
 
 
 
Forrester Research, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 
   
Delaware
 04-2797789
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 (I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
400 Technology Square
 02139
Cambridge, Massachusetts
(Address of principal executive offices)
 (Zip Code)
 
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:
(617) 613-6000
 
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
 
   
Title of Each Class
 
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
 
Common Stock, $.01 Par Value
 Nasdaq Global Select Market
 
Securities to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
 
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  Yes o     No þ
 
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.  Yes o     No þ
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirement for the past 90 days.  Yes þ     No o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 ofRegulation S-Tduring the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files.)  Yes o     No o     
 
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 ofRegulation S-K(§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of thisForm 10-Kor any amendment to thisForm 10-K.þ
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
 
       
Large accelerated filer o
 Accelerated filer þ Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
 Smaller reporting company o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined inRule 12b-2of the Act).  Yes o     No þ
 
The aggregate market value of the registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2009 (based on the closing price as quoted by the Nasdaq National Market as of such date) was approximately $360,000,000.
 
As of March 10, 2010, 22,449,868 shares of the registrant’s common stock were outstanding.
 
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
 
Portions of the registrant’s Proxy Statement related to its 2010 Annual Stockholders’ Meeting to be filed subsequently — Part III of thisForm 10-K.
 


 

 
This Annual Report onForm 10-Kcontains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “estimates,” or similar expressions are intended to identify these forward-looking statements. Reference is made in particular to our statements about possible acquisitions, our plans for international expansion and the adequacy of our cash, marketable investments and cash flows to satisfy our working capital and capital expenditures. These statements are based on our current plans and expectations and involve risks and uncertainties. Important factors that could cause actual future activities and results of operations to be materially different from those set forth in the forward-looking statements are discussed below under “Risk Factors.” We undertake no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.
 
PART I
 
General
 
Forrester Research, Inc. is an independent research company that provides pragmatic and forward-thinking advice to global leaders in business and technology. Our products and services are targeted to 19 specific roles, including senior management in business strategy, marketing and information technology at $1 billion-plus (revenue) companies who collaborate with us to accelerate achievement of their business goals.
 
Research serves as the foundation for all our solutions and consists primarily of annual memberships to our RoleViewtmsyndicated research offerings that provide access to our core research on a wide range of business and technology issues critical to the success of the individuals in the roles we serve. In addition to our RoleView offerings, we also provide a portfolio of products and services that allow our clients to interact directly with analysts and their peers and explore in greater detail the issues and topics covered by RoleView research on a role and client-specific basis.
 
We were incorporated in Massachusetts on July 7, 1983 and reincorporated in Delaware on February 16, 1996.
 
Our Internet address is www.forrester.com. We make available free of charge, on or through the investor information section of our website, annual reports onForm 10-K,quarterly reports onForm 10-Q,and current reports onForm 8-Kand amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC.
 
Industry Background
 
Technology plays a central role in companies’ and their employees’ efforts to remain both competitive and cost-efficient in an increasingly complex global business environment. Developing comprehensive and coordinated business strategies is difficult because as the economy and technology change, consumers and businesses adopt new methods of buying and selling, and markets grow increasingly dynamic.
 
Consequently, companies and the professionals who are in the roles we serve rely on external sources of expertise that provide independent business advice spanning a variety of areas including but not limited to technology, business strategy, and customer behavior. We believe there is a need for objective research that is thematic, prescriptive, and executable, and that provides a comprehensive perspective on the knowledge and skills required to succeed in today’s rapidly changing business environment.
 
Forrester’s Strategy
 
In 2007, Forrester accelerated execution of a role-based strategy to focus attention on serving leaders in key roles across its client base. Forrester’s role-centric solutions provide clients with more relevant insight, allowing them to make better informed and justified decisions faster.


2


 

We seek to maintain and enhance our position as a leading independent technology and market research firm and to capitalize on demand for our offerings by:
 
Identifying and Defining New Business Models, Technologies, and Markets.  We seek to differentiate ourselves from other research firms by delivering pragmatic and forward-thinking research and analysis on the impact of technology on business models, business practices, and technology infrastructure. We believe that our research methodology and our creative culture allow us to identify and analyze rapid shifts in business and consumer use of technology before these changes appear on the horizons of most users, vendors, and other research firms. Our early identification of these shifts enables us to help our clients capitalize on emerging business models and technologies.
 
Leveraging our RoleView Research.  Our business model, technology platform, and research methodologies allow us to sell existing products and to rapidly introduce new products and services without incurring significant incremental costs. We intend to continue to use our business model, technology platform, and research methodologies to both increase sales of our existing RoleView research products and introduce innovative new products. Our other offerings complement, enhance and supplement our RoleView research offerings, and many are designed to address the specific needs and problems of our clients and the professionals in the roles we serve. We also may acquire, through acquisition or license from third parties, new products and services that complement and support our strategy and existing offerings. In July 2008, we acquired JupiterResearch, LLC to enhance our offerings to marketing and strategy professionals. In December 2009 we acquired the business of New Strategic Oxygen, LLC whose products and services and decision tools enhance our offerings to technology product management & marketing professionals.
 
Using Targeted, Global Client-Centric Sales Channels.  Our business is organized into three principal global client groups that support our role-based strategy and are closely aligned with our client base: the Information Technology Client Group, the Marketing & Strategy Client Group, and the Technology Industry Client Group. Effective January 2010, we appointed senior role managers within our three principal client groups to better focus on creating and delivering relevant research and related products and services to the professional roles we serve. We sell our products and services directly through a global sales force with sales personnel focusing on the needs of professionals within each of the three principal client groups. Our sales force operates out of various locations in North America, Europe, and Australia. We also sell our products and services through independent sales representatives in select international locations.
 
Growing Our Client Base Worldwide and Increasing Sales to Existing Clients.  We believe that our products and services can be successfully marketed and sold to new client companies worldwide and to new roles and additional units and divisions within our existing client companies. We believe that within our client base of over 2,500 client companies as of December 31, 2009 there is opportunity both to sell additional products and services to current users as well as to deliver our RoleView research and product portfolio to a greater number of professionals in our targeted roles. In addition, we intend to expand our international presence as the growing impact of technology on business innovation creates demand for external sources of objective research.
 
Developing and Retaining Outstanding Research Professionals.  The knowledge and experience of our analysts are critical elements of our ability to provide high-quality products and services. We employ outstanding research professionals from varied backgrounds and a wide range of industries. We believe that our culture, which emphasizes quality, cooperation, and creativity, helps us to develop and retain high-caliber research professionals. We provide a competitive compensation structure, as well as recognition and rewards for excellent individual and team performance.


3


 

Forrester’s Solution
 
Our broad range of expertise on business and the impact of technology enables us to offer our clients the best available and most relevant research on changing business models, best practices, technology investments, implementation advice, and customer trends. Our solution provides our clients with:
 
A Unified Set of Services to Help our Clients and to Make their Leaders Successful in their Roles.  We offer clients a comprehensive set of products and services to obtain access to the research, data, analysts, and peer insights they need to be successful in their professional roles, including, for example, to:
 
  • Assess potential new markets, competitors, products, and services, andgo-to-marketstrategies.
 
  • Anticipate technology-driven business model shifts.
 
  • Understand trends in consumer behavior and how to capitalize on those trends for marketing and sales purposes.
 
  • Educate, inform, and align strategic decision-makers in their organizations.
 
  • Navigate technology purchase and implementation challenges and optimize technology investments.
 
  • Capitalize on emerging technologies.
 
Expertise on Emerging Technologies.  We started our business in 1983 and have a long history of, and extensive experience in, identifying trends and providing research and executable advice on the impact of technology on business. Our research analysts have many years of industry experience, are frequent speakers at business and technology conferences, and are often quoted in the media. They enjoy direct access to the leaders and decision-makers within large enterprises and technology vendors. We provide our research analysts with training to ensure that they have the skills to challenge conventional viewpoints and provide prescriptive, executable insight and research to our clients.
 
Products and Services
 
We offer our clients a selection of engagement opportunities that are organized for and directed toward the multiple professional roles we cover.
 
RoleviewtmResearch
 
Our primary syndicated research product, RoleView, provides clients with access to our core syndicated research designed to inform their strategic decision-making. Our various RoleView research offerings, including IT View, M&S View, TI View, each consists of a library of cross-linked documents that interconnect our reports, data, product rankings, best practices, evaluation tools, and research archives. RoleView research access is provided through role-based websites that facilitate client access to research and tools that are most relevant to their professional roles, including community tools that allow interaction between and among clients and our analysts. Through this access structure, each of our RoleView research offerings addresses the interplay of an individual client’s responsibilities and goals, business demands, and organizational and technology capabilities.
 
Our RoleView research products include The Forrester Wavetm. The Forrester Wave provides a detailed analysis of vendors’ technologies and services based on transparent, fully accessible criteria, and measurement of characteristics weighted by us. The Forrester Wave includes an Excel spreadsheet that allows clients to compare products and get in-depth data and analysis about each one and tools to develop a custom shortlist based on the client’s unique requirements. The Forrester Wave is our primary mechanism for evaluating enterprise technologies.
 
Clients subscribing to our RoleView research products may choose between two membership levels:
 
  • RoleView Member Licenses.  RoleView Member Licenses include access to the written research, as well as Inquiry with analysts, one Event seat, and access to Forrester Teleconferences. Inquiry enables clients to contact our analysts for quick feedback on projects they may have underway, to discuss ideas and models in the research, or for answers to questions about unfolding industry events. Typically, Inquiry sessions are30-minutephone calls, scheduled upon client request, ore-mailresponses coordinated through our research


4


 

 specialists. Events bring together executives and other participants for one ormulti-dayconferences to network with their peers and to hear business leaders discuss the issues and solutions most pertinent to their roles and responsibilities. Forrester Teleconferences are hour-long audio conferences on selected topics of interest to particular professional roles that typically are held several times a week. They consist of an analyst-led presentation followed by questions from participants. Members may access the analyst Web presentation and participate in the subsequent forum for questions and discussion among all attendees. Teleconferences are also made available for member download.
 
  • RoleView Reader Licenses.  RoleView Reader Licenses provide access to our written research.
 
Both Member and Reader clients receive access to our research specialists, who provide additional information about our research, methodologies, coverage areas, and sources. The research specialists are available to help clients navigate our website, find relevant information, and put clients in contact with the appropriate analyst for inquiries.
 
Forrester Leadership Boards
 
Our Forrester Leadership Boards are exclusive offerings for executives and other key employees at large companies worldwide. Clients may choose to participate in one or more Forrester Leadership Boards. Memberships are available in the Chief Information Officer (CIO) Group and the Chief Marketing Officer (CMO) Group and in a number of additional IT, marketing, and executive programs and councils addressing issues of interest to the professional roles we cover. In addition to a Member license to access the appropriate RoleView research offering, members of our Forrester Leadership Boards receive access to the following:
 
  • Advisors to assist members with individual research-related questions, and topics of specific relevance to the challenges these clients face.
 
  • Membership-directed research which includes comprehensive coverage of industry trends and best practices.
 
  • Exclusive industry-specific benchmark data.
 
  • Peer-to-peernetworking through premier event meetings and group audio-conferences, individual member to member conversations, and virtual community activities.
 
Data Products & Services
 
Our Data products and services focus on consumers’ and business users’ attitudes about and behavior toward technology, including ownership, future purchases, and adoption trends. These products incorporate extensive survey research designed and analyzed by our staff. Clients can leverage our data products and services or choose to have us conduct data analysis on their behalf. Our data products and services include:
 
  • Consumer Technographics®Data & Services.  Consumer Technographics delivers both primary data and quantitative research, based on surveys of over 250,000 households and individuals in North America, Europe and Asia Pacific, and Latin America. Marketing and strategy professionals rely on our Consumer Technographics data for unique insights into how technology impacts the way consumers select, purchase, use, and communicate about products and services. We combine respondent data sets from our Consumer Technographics surveys into four offerings: North American Consumer Technographics, European Consumer Technographics, Asia Pacific Consumer Technographics and Latin America Consumer Technographics. Additionally, clients have access to a Technographics data specialist to help them use the data effectively to meet their specific business needs.
 
  • Business Data Services.  Our Business Data Services is an ongoing quantitative research program that provides comprehensive, in-depth assessments of what motivates businesses to choose certain technologies and vendors over others. We annually survey more than 18,000 business and IT executives at North American, European, and other global large enterprises and small and midsize businesses. Our surveys reveal these firms’ technology adoption trends, budgets, business organization, decision processes, purchase plans, and brand preferences. Business Data and Services clients also have access to a data specialist.


5


 

 
Forrester Consulting
 
Our research-based advisory and project consulting services leverage our RoleView research offerings and our data products and services to deliver focused insights and recommendations to assist clients in developing and executing technology and business strategy, informing critical decisions and reducing business risk, and making large technology investments. For example, we help IT professionals with vendor selection, compare best practices, analyze whether outsourcing is advisable, and validate technology infrastructure; marketing and strategy professionals with consumer product strategy, direct marketing technology investments, eBusiness strategy, and interactive marketing strategy, including Web 2.0; and technology industry professionals with market and competitive assessments,go-to-marketstrategy, custom market research, and product development.
 
Our consulting services include Website Reviews that provide targeted, action-oriented assessments of clients’ websites, extranets, or intranets. Feedback is based on a comprehensive examination of the clients’ website and web strategies as well as reviews and comparisons with competitors’ websites, other channels and industry benchmarks.
 
Forrester Events
 
We host multiple Events in various locations in North America and Europe throughout the year. Events build upon our research and data products and services to bring together executives and other participants serving or interested in the particular professional role(s) in which an event focuses. Event participants come together to network with their peers, meet with Forrester analysts, and to hear business leaders discuss business and technology issues of interest or significance to the professional roles in attendance and the impact of technology on the professionals and their businesses.
 
Sales and Marketing
 
Our business is organized into three principal global client groups that support our role-based strategy and closely align with our client base: the IT Client Group, the Marketing & Strategy Client Group, and the Technology Industry Client Group. We sell our products and services through each client group’s direct sales force in various locations in North America, Europe, and Australia. We also sell our products and services through independent sales representatives in select international locations. We employed 315 salespersons as of December 31, 2009, a decrease of 11% from 353 as of December 31, 2008. We also sell certain of our research products directly online through our website.
 
For information on our operating segments and our international operations, see Note 11 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included herein.
 
Our marketing activities are designed to increase awareness of the Forrester brand and further our reputation as a leader in role-based business and technology research. We actively promote brand awareness via our website, Forrester Events, extensive worldwide press relations, and direct mail campaigns. We also employ an integrated direct marketing strategy that uses Internet, mail, and telephone channels for identifying and attracting high-quality sales leads. We encourage our analysts to increase our visibility by having their research ideas selectively distributed through various Internet, print, and television outlets.
 
As of December 31, 2009, our research was delivered to more than 2,500 client companies. No single client company accounted for more than 2% of our 2009 revenues.
 
Pricing and Contracts
 
We report our revenue from client contracts in two categories of revenue: (1) research services and (2) advisory services and other. Research offerings principally generate research revenues, and Consulting offerings consist solely of advisory services revenues. We classify revenue from our Consumer Technographics Data & Services and Business Data Services as research services revenue. Revenue from memberships to the Forrester Leadership Boards is classified as research services revenue, and revenue from Forrester Events is classified as other revenue in our advisory services and other revenue classification.
 
Contract pricing for annual memberships for research only is principally a function of the number of licensed users at the client. Pricing of contracts for research and advisory services is a function of the number of licensed


6


 

users, and the amount and type of advisory services. We track the agreement value of contracts to purchase research and advisory services as a significant business indicator. We calculate agreement value as the total revenues recognizable from all research and advisory service contracts in force at a given time (but not including advisory-only contracts), without regard to how much revenue has already been recognized. Agreement value decreased 12% to $194.8 million at December 31, 2009 from $222.5 million at December 31, 2008.
 
Research Analysts and Methodology
 
We employ a structured methodology in our research that enables us to identify and analyze technology trends, markets, and audiences and ensures consistent research quality and recommendations across all coverage areas. We seek to provide relevant research that will contribute to the success of our clients in their professional roles.
 
We ascertain the issues important to our clients and technology users through thousands of interactions and surveys with vendors and business, marketing, and IT professionals, and accordingly, the majority of our research is focused on the issues our clients face each day. We use the following primary research inputs:
 
  • Confidential interviews with early adopters and mainstream users of new technologies.
 
  • In-depth interviews with technology vendors and suppliers of related services.
 
  • Ongoing briefings with vendors to review current positions and future directions.
 
  • Continuous dialogue with our clients to identify technology issues in the marketplace.
 
Our Consumer Technographics®and Business Data Services research combines our qualitative research methodology with traditional survey research methodologies such as correlation, frequency distribution, cross-tabulation, and multivariate statistics to produce research reports, quantitative survey data, and data briefs. Third-party data vendors are frequently used for data collection and tabulation.
 
The Forrester Wavetmcombines in-depth product test results and user interviews with market and strategic analysis to score attributes of emerging technologies. We then apply this research and strategic analysis to determine the weighting of each attribute and create interactive spreadsheets, databases, and reports.
 
Collaboration among analysts is an integral part of our process, leading to higher-quality research and a unified perspective. All RoleView research begins either with a client or vendor catalyst or with discussion sessions among analysts to generate ideas for research. Analysts test ideas throughout the research process at both informal and weekly research meetings and using social media technologies. Our reports are consistent in format, and we require our analysts to write in a structure that combines graphics witheasy-to-readtext to deliver concise, decisive, relevant, and objective research to our clients.
 
Competition
 
We believe that the principal competitive factors in our industry include the following:
 
  • Quality of research and analysis and related services.
 
  • The ability to offer products and services that meet the changing needs of organizations and executives for research and analysis.
 
  • Customer service.
 
  • Independent analysis and opinions.
 
  • Timely delivery of information.
 
  • The ability to leverage new technologies.
 
  • Price.
 
We believe that we compete favorably with respect to each of these factors. We believe that our role-based strategy and focus on emerging technologies are significant competitive advantages. Additionally, we believe that


7


 

our role-based strategy, research methodology,easy-to-readformats, and portfolio of complementary product offerings distinguish us from our competitors.
 
We compete principally in the market for research and advisory services about and relating to technology and its impact on business. Our principal direct competitors include other providers of similar services, such as Gartner, as well as providers of peer networking services and Internet and digital media measurement services. In addition, our indirect competitors include the internal planning and marketing staffs of our current and prospective clients, as well as other information providers such as electronic and print publishing companies, survey-based general market research firms, and general business consulting firms. Our indirect competitors could choose to compete directly against us in the future. In addition, there are relatively few barriers to entry into our market, and new competitors could readily seek to compete against us in one or more market segments addressed by our research. Increased competition could adversely affect our operating results through pricing pressure and loss of market share. There can be no assurance that we will be able to continue to compete successfully against existing or new competitors.
 
Employees
 
As of December 31, 2009, we employed a total of 947 persons, including 362 research staff and 315 sales personnel.
 
Our culture emphasizes certain key values — including client service, quality, and creativity — that we believe are critical to our future growth. We promote these values through training and frequent recognition for achievement. We encourage teamwork and promote and recognize individuals who foster these values. New employees participate in athree-daytraining process that focuses on our role-based strategy, our products and services, corporate culture, values and goals.
 
Item 1A.  Risk Factors
 
We are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual future activities and results of operations to be materially different from those set forth in forward-looking statements made by us. These risks and uncertainties include:
 
Our Business may be Adversely Affected by the Current Economic Environment.  Our business is in part dependent on technology spending and is impacted by economic conditions. The current global credit crisis and economic environment may materially and adversely affect demand for our products and services. If current conditions in the United States and global economy were to lead to a further decrease in technology spending, or in demand for our research and advisory services, this could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
 
Our international operations expose us to a variety of operational risks which could negatively impact our results of operations.  We have clients in over 60 countries and approximately 30% of our revenue comes from international sales. Our operating results are subject to the risks inherent in international business activities, including challenges in staffing and managing foreign operations, changes in regulatory requirements, compliance with numerous foreign laws and regulations, differences between U.S. and foreign tax rates and laws, and the difficulty of enforcing client agreements, collecting accounts receivable and protecting intellectual property rights in international jurisdictions. Furthermore, we rely on local independent sales representatives in some international locations. If any of these arrangements are terminated by our representative or us, we may not be able to replace the arrangement on beneficial terms or on a timely basis, or clients of the local sales representative may not want to continue to do business with us or our new representative.
 
A Decline in Renewals for Our Membership-Based Research Services.  Our success depends in large part upon retaining (on both a client company and dollar basis) and enriching existing memberships for our research products and services. Our client and dollar retention rate and enrichment rate (see Item 7 — Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations — Overview) declined in 2008 as compared with 2007. Our client and dollar retention rate increased in 2009 as compared with 2008 however our enrichment rate continued to decline in 2009 as compared to 2008. Future declines in client retention, dollar retention, and enrichment could have an adverse effect on our results of operations.


8


 

Ability To Develop and Offer New Products And Services.  Our future success will depend in part on our ability to offer new products and services. These new products and services must successfully gain market acceptance by anticipating and identifying changes in client requirements and changes in the technology industry and by addressing specific industry and business organization sectors. The process of internally researching, developing, launching and gaining client acceptance of a new product or service, or assimilating and marketing an acquired product or service, is risky and costly. We may not be able to introduce new, or assimilate acquired, products or services successfully. Our failure to do so would adversely affect our ability to maintain a competitive position in our market and continue to grow our business.
 
Loss of Key Management.  Our future success will depend in large part upon the continued services of a number of our key management employees. The loss of any one of them, in particular George F. Colony, our founder, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, could adversely affect our business.
 
The Ability To Attract and Retain Qualified Professional Staff.  Our future success will depend in large measure upon the continued contributions of our senior management team, research analysts, and experienced sales and marketing personnel. Thus, our future operating results will be largely dependent upon our ability to retain the services of these individuals and to attract additional professionals from a limited pool of qualified candidates. We experience competition in hiring and retaining professionals from developers of Internet and emerging-technology products, other research firms, management consulting firms, print and electronic publishing companies and financial services companies, many of which have substantially greater ability, either through cash or equity, to attract and compensate professionals. If we lose professionals or are unable to attract new talent, we will not be able to maintain our position in the market or grow our business.
 
Failure To Anticipate and Respond To Market Trends.  Our success depends in part upon our ability to anticipate rapidly changing technologies and market trends and to adapt our research to meet the changing information needs of our clients. The technology and commerce sectors that we analyze undergo frequent and often dramatic changes. The environment of rapid and continuous change presents significant challenges to our ability to provide our clients with current and timely analysis, strategies and advice on issues of importance to them. Meeting these challenges requires the commitment of substantial resources. Any failure to continue to provide insightful and timely analysis of developments, technologies, and trends in a manner that meets market needs could have an adverse effect on our market position and results of operations.
 
Competition.  We compete in the market for research products and services with other independent providers of similar services. We may also face increased competition from Internet-based research firms. Some of our competitors have substantially greater financial, information-gathering, and marketing resources than we do. In addition, our indirect competitors include the internal planning and marketing staffs of our current and prospective clients, as well as other information providers such as electronic and print publishing companies, survey-based general market research firms and general business consulting firms. Our indirect competitors may choose to compete directly against us in the future. In addition, there are relatively few barriers to entry into our market, and new competitors could readily seek to compete against us in one or more market segments addressed by our products and services. Increased competition could adversely affect our operating results through pricing pressure and loss of market share.
 
Fluctuations in Our Operating Results.  Our revenues and earnings may fluctuate from quarter to quarter based on a variety of factors, many of which are beyond our control, and which may affect our stock price. These factors include, but are not limited to:
 
  • Trends in technology spending in the marketplace and general economic conditions.
 
  • The timing and size of new and renewal memberships for our research services from clients.
 
  • The utilization of our advisory services by our clients.
 
  • The timing of revenue-generating Events sponsored by us.
 
  • The introduction and marketing of new products and services by us and our competitors.
 
  • The hiring and training of new analysts and sales personnel.


9


 

 
  • Changes in demand for our research and advisory services.
 
As a result, our operating results in future quarters may be below the expectations of securities analysts and investors, which could have an adverse effect on the market price for our common stock. Factors such as announcements of new products, services, offices, acquisitions or strategic alliances by us, our competitors, or in the technologies services industry generally may have a significant impact on the market price of our common stock. The market price for our common stock may also be affected by movements in prices of stocks in general.
 
We may realize losses on our investments or be unable to liquidate these investments at desired times and in desired amounts.  At December 31, 2009, we had approximately $10.0 million of long-term marketable investments in municipal notes with an auction reset feature (“auction rate securities” or “ARS”). In February 2008, auctions had begun to fail for these securities, which means that the parties wishing to sell securities could not. Based on current market conditions, it is likely that auction failures will continue and as a result, our ability to liquidate our investment and fully recover the carrying value of our investment in the near term may be limited or not exist.
 
Item 1B.  Unresolved Staff Comments
 
We have not received written comments from the Securities and Exchange Commission that remain unresolved.
 
Item 2.  Properties
 
Our headquarters are located in approximately 145,000 square feet of office space in Cambridge, Massachusetts, substantially all of which is currently occupied by the Company. This facility accommodates research, marketing, sales, technology, and operations personnel. The lease term of this facility expires in September 2011. We have the option to extend this lease for an additional five-year term.
 
On September 29, 2009, we entered into abuild-to-suitnet lease (“Lease”) with BHX, LLC, as trustee of Acorn Park I Realty Trust and predecessor to 200 Discovery Park, LLC (“Landlord”) pursuant to which the Landlord will build a new corporate headquarters building for our Company in an office park in the Alewife section of Cambridge, Massachusetts. Pursuant to the Lease, as amended, the Landlord will construct an approximately 190,000 square foot building (“Building”) and lease the Building and parcel to us to be used as our new corporate headquarters. During construction, we will continue to occupy our current corporate headquarters in Cambridge, Massachusetts under the existing lease for such premises. The commencement date under the Lease is presently expected to be on or about September 1, 2011.
 
We also rent office space in Foster City and San Francisco, California, New York City, Dallas, McLean Virginia, Austin, Texas, Amsterdam, Frankfurt, London and Paris. We also lease office space on a relatively short-term basis in various other locations in the North America, Europe and Asia.
 
We believe that our existing facilities are adequate for our current needs and that additional facilities are available for lease to meet future needs.
 
Item 3.  Legal Proceedings
 
We are not currently a party to any material legal proceedings.


10


 

PART II
 
Item 5.  Market For Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
 
Our common stock is listed on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol “FORR.” We did not declare or pay any dividends during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2008 and 2009. We anticipate that future earnings, if any, will be retained for the development of our business, and we do not presently intend to pay cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future.
 
As of March 10, 2010 there were approximately 44 stockholders of record of our common stock. On March 10, 2010 the closing price of our common stock was $31.63 per share.
 
The following table represents the ranges of high and low sale prices of our common stock for the years ended December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2009:
 
                 
  2008 2009
  High Low High Low
 
First Quarter
 $28.39  $23.60  $28.14  $16.49 
Second Quarter
 $32.23  $25.03  $25.44  $19.41 
Third Quarter
 $35.66  $28.57  $26.64  $21.59 
Fourth Quarter
 $28.63  $19.55  $27.66  $24.70 
 
Through 2009, our Board of Directors has authorized an aggregate $200.0 million to purchase common stock under the stock repurchase program. During the quarter ended December 31, 2009, we purchased the following shares of our common stock under the stock repurchase program:
 
             
        Maximum Dollar
 
        Value that May
 
        Yet be Purchased
 
  Total Number of
  Average Price
  Under the Stock
 
Period
 Shares Purchased(1)  Paid per Share  Repurchase Program 
        (In thousands) 
 
October 1 — October 31
    $  $63,919 
November 1 — November 30
  134,538  $25.28  $60,518 
December 1 — December 31
  69,495  $25.41  $58,752 
   204,033  $25.32  $58,752 
 
 
(1) All purchases of our common stock were made under the previously announced stock repurchase program.


11


 

 
The following graph contains the cumulative stockholder return on our common stock during the period from December 31, 2004 through December 31, 2009 with the cumulative return during the same period for the Nasdaq Stock Market (U.S. Companies) and the Russell 2000, and assumes that the dividends, if any, were reinvested.
 
(PERFORMANCE GRAPH)
 
 
                         
  Cumulative Total Return
  12/31/2004 12/31/2005 12/31/2006 12/31/2007 12/31/2008 12/31/2009
Forrester Research
  100.00   104.52   151.11   156.19   157.25   144.65 
                         
Nasdaq Stock Market (US Companies)
  100.00   102.13   112.19   121.68   58.64   84.28 
                         
Russell 2000
  100.00   103.32   120.89   117.57   76.65   95.98 
                         


12


 

Item 6.  Selected Consolidated Financial Data
 
The selected financial data presented below is derived from our consolidated financial statements and should be read in connection with those statements.
 
                     
  Years Ended December 31,
  2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
  (In thousands, except per share amounts)
 
Consolidated Statement of Income Data
                    
Research services
 $96,699  $114,876  $131,163  $155,339  $157,726 
Advisory services and other
  54,700   66,597   80,893   85,536   75,626 
                     
Total revenue
  151,399   181,473   212,056   240,875   233,352 
Operating income
  14,783   20,042   22,651   37,964   32,420 
Other income, net
  4,722   6,052   7,353   6,846   1,315 
Income from continuing operations
 $12,262  $16,057  $18,943  $29,215  $18,866 
Basic income per common share from continuing operations
 $0.57  $0.72  $0.82  $1.27  $0.83 
Diluted income per common share from continuing operations
 $0.56  $0.70  $0.80  $1.24  $0.82 
Basic weighted average shares outstanding
  21,413   22,195   23,074   23,062   22,645 
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding
  21,876   22,973   23,729   23,585   22,884 
 
                     
  As of December 31,
  2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
  (In thousands)
 
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data
                    
Cash, cash equivalents and marketable investments
 $132,268  $207,833  $248,974  $259,929  $259,792 
Working capital
  99,005   166,274   209,527   166,001   190,667 
Total assets
  308,342   384,143   426,357   454,951   470,196 
Deferred revenue
  86,663   99,875   111,418   113,844   117,888 
Total liabilities
  118,995   139,238   151,341   151,454   158,251 
 
The following items impact the comparability of our consolidated data:
 
  • The results of JupiterResearch, LLC, and its parent company, JUPR Holdings, Inc. (“JupiterResearch”) are included in our consolidated results beginning July 31, 2008, the date of acquisition. See Note 2 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
  • The 2008 other income amount includes a net foreign exchange loss of approximately $1.6 million ($1.2 million after tax) resulting primarily from the remeasurement of certain intercompany payables and receivables. Of the net $1.6 million loss, approximately $1.9 million related to periods prior to 2008.
 
  • Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted a new accounting standard update requiring the recognition of stock-based compensation expense in our Consolidated Statements of Income based upon the fair value of the award recognized over the related service period. During the years ended December 31, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009, we recognized approximately $7.2 million, $8.3 million, $5.4 million and $6.1 million of stock-based compensation expense, respectively.
 
  • The 2009 operating income amount includes a $5.4 million reorganization charge for facility consolidations and areduction-in-forceof approximately 50 employees. See Note 10 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.


13


 

 
Item 7.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
 
Overview
 
We derive revenues from memberships to our research products and from our advisory services and events. We offer contracts for our research products that are typically renewable annually and payable in advance. Research revenues are recognized as revenue ratably over the term of the contract. Accordingly, a substantial portion of our billings are initially recorded as deferred revenue. Clients purchase advisory services independentlyand/or to supplement their memberships to our research. Billings attributable to advisory services are initially recorded as deferred revenue and are recognized as revenue when the services are performed. Event billings are also initially recorded as deferred revenue and are recognized as revenue upon completion of each event.
 
Our primary operating expenses consist of cost of services and fulfillment, selling and marketing expenses and general and administrative expenses. Cost of services and fulfillment represents the costs associated with the production and delivery of our products and services, including salaries, bonuses, employee benefits and stock-based compensation expense for research personnel and all associated editorial, travel, and support services. Selling and marketing expenses include salaries, bonuses, employee benefits, stock-based compensation expense, travel expenses, promotional costs, sales commissions, and other costs incurred in marketing and selling our products and services. General and administrative expenses include the costs of the technology, operations, finance, and strategy groups and our other administrative functions, including salaries, bonuses, employee benefits, and stock-based compensation expense. Overhead costs such as facilities are allocated to these categories according to the number of employees in each group.
 
Deferred revenue, agreement value, client retention, dollar retention and enrichment are metrics we believe are important to understanding our business. We believe that the amount of deferred revenue, along with the agreement value of contracts to purchase research and advisory services, provide a significant measure of our business activity. Deferred revenue reflects billings in advance of revenue recognition as of the measurement date. We calculate agreement value as the total revenues recognizable from all research and advisory service contracts in force at a given time (but not including advisory-only contracts), without regard to how much revenue has already been recognized. No single client accounted for more than 2% of agreement value at December 31, 2009. We calculate client retention as the percentage of client companies with memberships expiring during the most recent twelve-month period who renewed one or more of those memberships during that same period. We calculate dollar retention as a percentage of the dollar value of all client membership contracts renewed during the most recent twelve-month period to the total dollar value of all client membership contracts that expired during the period. We calculate enrichment as a percentage of the dollar value of client membership contracts renewed during the period to the dollar value of the corresponding expiring contracts. Client retention, dollar retention, and enrichment are not necessarily indicative of the rate of future retention of our revenue base. A summary of our key metrics is as follows:
 
                 
  Years Ended
 Absolute
 Percentage
  December 31, Increase
 Increase
  2008 2009 (Decrease) (Decrease)
 
Deferred revenue (in millions at year-end)
 $113.8  $117.9  $4.1   3.6%
Agreement value (in millions at year-end)
 $222.5  $194.8  $(27.7)  (12.4)%
Client retention
  73%  74%  1   1.4%
Dollar retention
  84%  86%  2   2.4%
Enrichment
  102%  96%  (6)  (5.9)%
Number of clients (at year-end)
  2,643   2,519   (124)  (4.7)%
 


14


 

                 
  Years Ended
 Absolute
 Percentage
  December 31, Increase
 Increase
  2007 2008 (Decrease) (Decrease)
 
Deferred revenue (in millions at year-end)
 $111.4  $113.8  $2.4   2%
Agreement value (in millions at year-end)
 $197.2  $222.5  $25.3   13%
Client retention
  75%  73%  (2)  (3)%
Dollar retention
  85%  84%  (1)  (1)%
Enrichment
  105%  102%  (3)  (3)%
Number of clients (at year-end)
  2,468   2,643   175   7%
 
The increase in deferred revenue from 2008 to 2009 is primarily due to increased demand for our products due to the improvement in the economy in the fourth quarter of 2009 compared to 2008 and well as the effect of the JupiterResearch and Strategic Oxygen acquisitions completed in July 2008 and December 2009, respectively. See Note 2 — Acquisitions in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The decrease in agreement value from 2008 to 2009 is reflective of the economic downturn in the second half of 2008 through the majority of 2009 which resulted in a lower number of clients and lower enrichment rates in 2009 compared to 2008 and also is due to the exclusion in 2009 of agreement value in excess of the first year value for multiple year contracts signed in 2009. Client and dollar retention amounts were essentially flat in 2009 compared to 2008.
 
The increase in deferred revenue from 2007 to 2008 is primarily due to the acquisition of JupiterResearch. The increase in agreement value from 2007 to 2008 is primarily due to an increase in the average contract size and to the acquisition of JupiterResearch. The acquisition of JupiterResearch accounted for $13.3 million of agreement value at December 31, 2008. Client retention, dollar retention and enrichment all declined slightly year over year primarily due to the effects of a global economic downturn in the second half of 2008.
 
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
 
Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our policies and estimates, including but not limited to, those related to our revenue recognition, stock-based compensation, allowance for doubtful accounts, non-marketable investments, goodwill and intangible assets, income taxes and valuation and impairment of marketable investments. Management bases its estimates on historical experience, data available at the time the estimates are made and various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
 
We consider the following accounting policies to be those that require the most subjective judgment or that involve uncertainty that could have a material impact on our financial statements. If actual results differ significantly from management’s estimates and projections, there could be a material effect on our financial statements. This is not a comprehensive list of all of our accounting policies. In many cases, the accounting treatment of a particular transaction is specifically dictated by GAAP, with no need for management’s judgment in its application. There are also areas in which management’s judgment in selecting any available alternative would not produce a materially different result. For a discussion of our other accounting policies, see Note 1 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements beginning onpage F-6.
 
  • Revenue Recognition.  We generate revenues from licensing our research, performing advisory services and consulting projects, hosting events and conducting teleconferences. We execute contracts that govern the terms and conditions of each arrangement. Revenues from contracts that contain multiple deliverables are allocated among the separate units based on their relative fair values; however, the amount recognized is limited to the amount that is not contingent on future performance conditions. Research service revenues are

15


 

 recognized ratably over the term of the agreement. Advisory service revenues are recognized during the period in which the customer receives the agreed upon deliverable and consulting project revenues are recognized as the services are provided. Forrester Teleconferences revenue and reimbursedout-of-pocketexpenses are recorded as advisory service revenues. Events revenues are recognized upon completion of the event. Annual memberships, which include access to our research, unlimited phone or email analyst inquiry, unlimited participation in Forrester Teleconferences, and the right to attend one event, are accounted for as one unit of accounting and recognized ratably as research services revenue over the membership period. We offer our clients a service guarantee, which gives them the right to cancel their contracts prior to the end of the contract term and receive a refund for unused products or services. Furthermore, our revenue recognition determines the timing of commission expenses, which are deferred and recognized as expense as the related revenue is recognized. We evaluate the recoverability of deferred commissions at each balance sheet date.
 
  • Stock-Based Compensation.  Stock-based compensation is recognized as an expense based upon the fair value of the award at the time of grant. The determination of the fair value of stock-based compensation requires significant judgment and the use of estimates, particularly surrounding assumptions such as stock price volatility, expected option lives and forfeiture rates. These estimates involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management judgment. As a result, if circumstances change and we use different assumptions, our stock-based compensation expense could be materially different in the future.
 
The development of an expected life assumption involves projecting employee exercise behaviors (expected period between stock option vesting dates and stock option exercise dates). We are also required to estimate future forfeitures of stock-based awards for recognition of compensation expense. We will record additional expense if the actual forfeitures are lower than estimated and will record a recovery of prior recognized expense if the actual forfeitures are higher than estimated. In addition, for our performance-vested options and restricted stock units, we make estimates of the performance outcome at each period end in order to estimate the actual number of shares that will be earnedand/or the vesting period of the award. The actual expense recognized over the vesting period will only be for those awards that vest. If our actual forfeiture rate or performance outcomes are materially different from our estimate, the actual stock-based compensation expense could be significantly different from what we have recorded in the current period.
 
  • Non-Marketable Investments.  We hold minority interests in technology-related investment funds. These investment funds are not publicly traded, and, therefore, because no established market for these securities exists, the estimate of the fair value of our investments requires significant judgment. Investments that are accounted for using the cost method are valued at cost unless another-than-temporaryimpairment in their value occurs or the investment is liquidated. For investments that are accounted for using the equity method, we record our share of the investee’s operating results each period. We review the fair value of our investments on a regular basis to evaluate whether another-than-temporaryimpairment in the investment has occurred. We record impairment charges when we believe that an investment has experienced a decline in value that isother-than-temporary.Future adverse changes in market conditions or poor operating results of underlying investments could result in losses or an inability to recover the carrying value of the investments that may not be reflected in an investment’s current carrying value, thereby possibly requiring an impairment charge in the future.
 
  • Goodwill, Intangible Assets and Other Long-Lived Assets.  As of December 31, 2009, we had $80.4 million of goodwill and intangible assets with finite lives recorded on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Goodwill is required to be measured for impairment at least annually or whenever events indicate that there may be an impairment. In order to determine if an impairment exists, we compare each of our reporting unit’s carrying value to the reporting unit’s fair value. Determining the reporting unit’s fair value requires us to make estimates on market conditions and operational performance. Absent an event that indicates a specific impairment may exist, we have selected November 30th as the date to perform the annual goodwill impairment test. Future events could cause us to conclude that impairment indicators exist and that goodwill associated with our acquired businesses is impaired. Any resulting impairment loss could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations.


16


 

 
Intangible assets with finite lives consist of acquired customer relationships, technology, research content and trademarks and are valued according to the future cash flows they are estimated to produce. These assigned values are amortized on a basis which best matches the periods in which the economic benefits are expected to be realized. Tangible assets with finite lives consist of property and equipment, which are depreciated and amortized over their estimated useful lives. We continually evaluate whether events or circumstances have occurred that indicate that the estimated remaining useful life of our intangible and long-lived tangible assets may warrant revision or that the carrying value of these assets may be impaired. To compute whether intangible assets have been impaired, the estimated undiscounted future cash flows for the estimated remaining useful life of the assets are compared to the carrying value. To the extent that the future cash flows are less than the carrying value, the assets are written down to their estimated fair value.
 
  • Income Taxes.  We have deferred tax assets related to temporary differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities as well as operating loss carryforwards (primarily from acquisitions). Such amounts are adjusted as appropriate to reflect changes in the tax rates expected to be in effect when the temporary differences reverse. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible and before the carryforwards expire. A valuation allowance is established for any deferred income tax asset for which realization is less than likely.
 
We record accruals for income taxes and associated interest that may become payable in future years as a result of audits by tax authorities. We recognize tax benefits when it is more likely than not (likelihood of greater than 50%), based on technical merits, that the position will be sustained upon examination. Tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not threshold are measured and recorded, using a probability weighted approach, as the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon settlement. Whether the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold is met for a tax position is a matter of judgment based on the individual facts and circumstances of that position, evaluated in light of all available evidence.
 
  • Valuation and Impairment of Marketable Investments.  Our investment portfolio may at any time contain investments in U.S. Treasury and U.S. government agency securities, taxableand/or tax exempt municipal notes (some of which may have an auction reset feature), corporate notes and bonds, commercial paper and money market funds. The assessment of the fair value of certain of the debt securities can be difficult and subjective due in part to limited trading activity of certain of these debt instruments.
 
We conduct periodic reviews to identify and evaluate each investment that has an unrealized loss, in accordance with the meaning ofother-than-temporaryimpairment and its application to certain investments, as required under current accounting standards. An unrealized loss exists when the current fair value of an individual security is less than its amortized cost basis. Unrealized losses onavailable-for-salesecurities that are determined to be temporary, and not related to credit loss, are recorded, net of tax, in accumulated other comprehensive loss.
 
Foravailable-for-saledebt securities with unrealized losses, management performs an analysis to assess whether we intend to sell or whether we would more likely than not be required to sell the security before the expected recovery of the amortized cost basis. Where we intend to sell a security, or may be required to do so, the security’s decline in fair value would be deemed to beother-than-temporaryand the full amount of the unrealized loss would be recorded within earnings as an impairment loss. Regardless of our intent to sell a security, we perform additional analysis on all securities with unrealized losses to evaluate losses associated with the creditworthiness of the security. Credit losses are identified where we do not expect to receive cash flows sufficient to recover the amortized cost basis of a security.
 
As of December 31, 2009, we held municipal bonds with a fair value of $39.5 million ($42.7 million at par value) with an auction reset feature (“auction rate securities” or “ARS”) with two investment advisors. The fair value of the ARS was determined by utilizing a discounted cash flow approach. The assumptions used in preparing the discounted cash flow model include estimates, based on data available at December 31, 2009,


17


 

of interest rates, timing and amount of cash flows, credit and liquidity premiums, and expected holding periods of the ARS. The assumptions used in valuing the ARS are volatile and subject to change as the underlying sources of these assumptions and market conditions change, which may lead us in the future to take an impairment charge for these securities.
 
In November 2008, we accepted an offer (the “Right”) from UBS AG (“UBS”), one of our investment advisors, entitling us to sell at par value auction-rate securities originally purchased from UBS (approximately $31.7 million, par value) at anytime during a two-year period from June 30, 2010 through July 2, 2012 (“UBS ARS”). Although the Company expects to sell its UBS ARS under the Right, if the Right is not exercised before July 2, 2012, it will expire and UBS will have no further rights or obligation to buy the Company’s UBS ARS. UBS’s obligations under the Right are not secured by its assets and do not require UBS to obtain any financing to support its performance obligations under the Right. If UBS has insufficient funding to buy back the UBS ARS and the auction process continues to fail, we may incur further losses on the carrying value of the UBS ARS.
 
The Right is recognized as a freestanding instrument that is accounted for at fair value separately from the underlying UBS ARS investment. We valued the Right using a discounted cash flow approach including estimates of interest rates and timing and amount of cash flow, based on data available at December 31, 2009 and adjusted for any bearer risk associated with UBS’s financial ability to repurchase the ARS beginning June 30, 2010. These assumptions are volatile and subject to change as the underlying sources of these assumptions and market conditions change and any change in these assumptions and market conditions would affect the value of this Right. The value of the Right of $2.1 million, which largely offsets the unrealized loss on the UBS ARS securities subject to the Right, is included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2009 within marketable securities and changes in its value are included in the Consolidated Statements of Income, together with the change in the unrealized loss on the UBS ARS subject to the Right for the year ended December 31, 2008 and 2009, as other income, net. We believe that any subsequent changes in the value of the Right will largely offset any fair value changes of the UBS ARS, subject to the continued expected performance by the financial institution of its obligations under the agreement.
 
Our remaining ARS are held by another investment advisor, who has not made an offer similar to UBS. We continue to classify the non-UBS ARS as long-termavailable-for-salesecurities. Accordingly, any change in associated market value has been recorded in other comprehensive loss in the Consolidated Balance Sheets during the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2009. If the market conditions deteriorate further, we may be required to record unrealized losses in other comprehensive loss or impairment charges within the Consolidated Statements of Income. We may not be able to liquidate these investments unless the issuer calls the security, a successful auction occurs, a buyer is found outside of the auction process, or the security matures.
 
Results of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009
 
The following table sets forth our Consolidated Statements of Income as a percentage of total revenues for the years noted.
 
             
  Years Ended
  December 31,
  2007 2008 2009
 
Revenues:
            
Research services
  62%  64%  68%
Advisory services and other
  38   36   32 
             
Total revenues
  100   100   100 


18


 

             
  Years Ended
  December 31,
  2007 2008 2009
 
Operating expenses:
            
Cost of services and fulfillment
  38   36   36 
Selling and marketing
  34   33   33 
General and administrative
  14   12   12 
Depreciation
  2   2   2 
Amortization of intangible assets
  1   1   1 
Reorganization costs
        2 
             
Income from operations
  11   16   14 
Other income, net
  4   2   1 
Gains (losses) on investments, net
  (1)  1   (1)
             
Income before income taxes
  14   19   14 
Income tax provision
  5   7   6 
             
Net income
  9%  12%  8%
             
 
2009 compared to 2008
 
Revenues
 
                 
      Absolute
 Percentage
      Increase
 Increase
  2008 2009 (Decrease) (Decrease)
 
Revenues (dollars in millions)
 $240.9  $233.4  $(7.5)  (3)%
Revenues from research services (dollars in millions)
 $155.4  $157.7  $2.3   1%
Revenues from advisory services and other (dollars in millions)
 $85.5  $75.6  $(9.9)  (12)%
Revenues attributable to customers outside of the US (dollars in millions)
 $67.9  $69.3  $1.4   2%
Percentage of revenue attributable to customers outside of the US
  28%  30%  2   7%
Number of clients (at end of period)
  2,643   2,519   (124)  (5)%
Number of research employees (at end of period)
  409   362   (47)  (11)%
Number of events
  14   14       
 
The decrease in total revenues in 2009 is primarily attributable to lower demand for our advisory and other services and the adverse effect of foreign exchange during 2009. The effects of foreign exchange resulted in an approximate 2% decrease in total revenues during 2009. The increase in revenue from research services in 2009 is due in part to our objective to drive a higher percentage of our revenue from research services, which was accomplished in part through greater alignment of our sales compensation plan with this objective, as well as the acquisition of JupiterResearch in July 2008. These increases were offset in part by a decline in the number of clients in 2009 due to the global economic slowdown. The decrease in advisory services and other revenue is reflective of the global economic slowdown in 2009 as well as our objective to drive a higher percentage of revenue from research services. No single client company accounted for more than 2% of revenues during 2008 or 2009.

19


 

Cost of Services and Fulfillment
 
                 
      Absolute
 Percentage
      Increase
 Increase
  2008 2009 (Decrease) (Decrease)
 
Cost of services and fulfillment (dollars in millions)
 $87.8  $84.3  $(3.5)  (4)%
Cost of services and fulfillment as a percentage of total revenues
  36%  36%      
Number of research and fulfillment employees (at end of period)
  495   441   (54)  (11)%
 
The decrease in the dollar amount of cost of services and fulfillment in 2009 is largely due to lower salary and benefit costs resulting from a lower number of employees in 2009, a decrease in discretionary spending due to management’s focus on expense management in light of the global economic downturn, a decrease in outsourced costs and a general freeze in salary increases in 2009. We expect to reinstate salary merit increases in 2010.
 
Selling and Marketing
 
                 
      Absolute
 Percentage
      Increase
 Increase
  2008 2009 (Decrease) (Decrease)
 
Selling and marketing expenses (dollars in millions)
 $79.9  $76.1  $(3.8)  (5)%
Selling and marketing expenses as a percentage of total revenues
  33%  33%      
Selling and marketing employees (at end of period)
  403   358   (45)  (11)%
 
The decrease in the dollar amount of selling and marketing expenses in 2009 is primarily due to a decrease in compensation resulting from lower headcount and lower sales commissions due to lower sales volume in 2009, reduced discretionary spending and a general salary freeze in 2009. In 2010, we expect to increase sales headcount by 15% to 20% and resume salary merit increases.
 
General and Administrative
 
                 
      Absolute
 Percentage
      Increase
 Increase
  2008 2009 (Decrease) (Decrease)
 
General and administrative expenses (dollars in millions)
 $29.7  $28.5  $(1.2)  (4)%
General and administrative expenses as a percentage of total revenues
  12%  12%      
General and administratvie employees (at end of period)
  150   148   (2)  (1)%
 
The decrease in the dollar amount of general and administrative expenses in 2009 is primarily due to a decrease in professional services fees as approximately $0.9 million of fees were incurred in 2008 related to our historical stock option investigation. The decrease in 2009 is also attributable to lower discretionary spending, lower hiring costs and a general salary freeze in 2009. We expect to reinstate salary merit increases in 2010.
 
Depreciation
 
                 
      Absolute
 Percentage
      Increase
 Increase
  2008 2009 (Decrease) (Decrease)
 
Depreciation expense (dollars in millions)
 $4.0  $4.4  $0.4   10%
Depreciation expense as a percentage of total revenues
  2%  2%      
 
The increase in depreciation expense in 2009 is primarily attributable to leasehold improvements completed in 2009.


20


 

Amortization of Intangible Assets
 
                 
      Absolute
 Percentage
      Increase
 Increase
  2008 2009 (Decrease) (Decrease)
 
Amortization expense (dollars in millions)
 $1.4  $2.3  $0.9   64%
Amortization expense as a percentage of total revenues
  1%  1%      
 
The increase in amortization expense in 2009 is primarily attributable to amortization of intangible assets from the acquisition of JupiterResearch on July 31, 2008 and Strategic Oxygen on December 1, 2009, partially offset by a decrease in amortization from an acquisition in 2003 that became fully amortized in 2008.
 
Reorganization Costs
 
                 
      Absolute
 Percentage
      Increase
 Increase
  2008 2009 (Decrease) (Decrease)
 
Reorganization costs (dollars in millions)
 $  $5.4  $5.4   N/A 
Reorganization costs as a percentage of total revenues
     2%  2   N/A 
 
Reorganization costs in 2009 consist of $3.1 million incurred in the first quarter of 2009 primarily for severance and related benefit costs in connection with the termination of approximately 50 positions and approximately $2.3 million incurred in the fourth quarter of 2009 for costs related to facility consolidations primarily in Cambridge, Massachusetts.
 
Other Income, Net
 
                 
      Absolute
 Percentage
      Increase
 Increase
  2008 2009 (Decrease) (Decrease)
 
Other income, net (dollars in millions)
 $5.4  $2.3  $(3.1)  (57)%
Other income, net as a percentage of total revenues
  2%  1%  (1)  50%
 
Other income, net, which consists primarily of interest income and foreign exchange gains and losses, declined in 2009 primarily due to a decline interest income resulting from a significant decrease in the rates of return on our investments.
 
Gains (Losses) on Investments
 
                 
      Absolute
 Percentage
      Increase
 Increase
  2008 2009 (Decrease) (Decrease)
 
Gain (losses) on investments, net (dollars in millions)
 $1.5  $(1.0) $(2.5)  (165)%
Gains (losses) on investments, net as a percentage of total revenues
  1%  (1)%  (2)  (200)%
 
In 2008 we sold the remainder of our investment in comScore, Inc. and received proceeds of approximately $2.3 million resulting in a gain of approximately $2.0 million. In 2008 and 2009, we recognized net losses from our non-marketable investments of approximately $0.6 million and $1.0 million, respectively.
 
Provision for Income Taxes
 
                 
      Absolute
 Percentage
      Increase
 Increase
  2008 2009 (Decrease) (Decrease)
 
Provision for income taxes (dollars in millions)
 $15.6  $14.9  $(0.7)  (4)%
Effective tax rate
  35%  44%  9   26%
 
The increase in our effective tax rate in 2009 is primarily due to an increase in state taxes, an increase in non-deductible expenses including stock-based compensation and a non-cash foreign exchange loss on the


21


 

remeasurement of a euro-denominated deferred tax liability. In addition, the 2008 effective tax rate was reduced by a reduction in a valuation allowance on foreign deferred tax assets that did not recur in 2009.
 
2008 compared to 2007
 
Revenues
 
                 
      Absolute
 Percentage
      Increase
 Increase
  2007 2008 (Decrease) (Decrease)
 
Revenues (dollars in millions)
 $212.1  $240.9  $28.8   14%
Revenues from research services (dollars in millions)
 $131.2  $155.4  $24.2   18%
Revenues from advisory services and other (dollars in millions)
 $80.9  $85.5  $4.6   6%
Revenues attributable to customers outside of the US (dollars in millions)
 $62.3  $67.9  $5.6   9%
Percentage of revenue attributable to customers outside of the US
  29%  28%  (1)  (3)%
Number of clients (at end of period)
  2,468   2,643   175   7%
Number of research employees (at end of period)
  336   409   73   22%
Number of events
  13   14   1   8%
 
The increase in total revenues, research services revenues and international revenues in 2008 is primarily due to an increase in the number of clients, which resulted primarily from an increase in sales personnel, the acquisition of JupiterResearch, favorable exchange rates, reduced discounting and increased prices. Of the 14% increase in revenues, the acquisition of JupiterResearch accounted for 3% and the impact of exchange rates accounted for 1%. The increase in advisory services and other revenues is primarily attributable to an increased demand for these services and an increase in research personnel available to deliver such services. No single client company accounted for more than 2% of revenues during 2007 or 2008.
 
The decrease in international revenues as a percentage of total revenues is primarily attributable to demand for our products and services growing at a faster rate domestically than internationally.
 
Research services revenues as a percentage of total revenues increased from 62% in 2007 to 64% in 2008 as a result of our objective to drive a higher percentage of our total revenue from research services. In 2008 we modified our sales compensation plan for greater alignment with this objective.
 
Cost of Services and Fulfillment
 
                 
      Absolute
 Percentage
      Increase
 Increase
  2007 2008 (Decrease) (Decrease)
 
Cost of services and fulfillment (dollars in millions)
 $81.6  $87.8  $6.2   8%
Cost of services and fulfillment as a percentage of total revenues
  38%  36%  (2)  (5)%
Number of research and fulfillment employees (at end of period)
  412   495   83   20%
 
The increase in cost of services and fulfillment in dollars is primarily attributable to increased compensation and benefits costs resulting from an increase in the number of research and fulfillment employees, both as a result of the acquisition of JupiterResearch and organically, partially offset by a decrease in stock-based compensation. The acquisition of JupiterResearch resulted in additional cost of services and fulfillment expense of $3.3 million. The decrease in cost of services and fulfillment as a percentage of total revenues is primarily attributable to an increased revenue base and the focus on expense management in the second half of 2008 in light of the global economic downturn.


22


 

Selling and Marketing
 
                 
      Absolute
 Percentage
      Increase
 Increase
  2007 2008 (Decrease) (Decrease)
 
Selling and marketing expenses (dollars in millions)
 $71.8  $79.9  $8.1   11%
Selling and marketing expenses as a percentage of total revenues
  34%  33%  (1)  (3)%
Selling and marketing employees (at end of period)
  357   403   46   13%
 
The increase in selling and marketing expenses in dollars is primarily attributable to increased compensation and benefits costs resulting from an increase in the number of selling and marketing employees, including as a result of the acquisition of JupiterResearch. The acquisition of JupiterResearch resulted in additional selling and marketing expense of $1.4 million. The decrease in selling and marketing expenses as a percentage of total revenues is primarily attributable to an increased revenue base and the focus on expense management in the second half of 2008 in light of the global economic downturn.
 
General and Administrative
 
                 
      Absolute
 Percentage
      Increase
 Increase
  2007 2008 (Decrease) (Decrease)
 
General and administrative expenses (dollars in millions)
 $30.7  $29.7  $(1.0)  (3)%
General and administrative expenses as a percentage of total revenues
  14%  12%  (2)  (14)%
General and administratvie employees (at end of period)
  134   150   16   12%
 
The decrease in general and administrative expenses in dollars and as a percentage of total revenues is primarily attributable to decreased professional services costs associated with the historical stock option investigation offset by increased compensation and benefits costs resulting from an increase in the number of general and administrative employees, including those added as a result of the acquisition of JupiterResearch. The acquisition of JupiterResearch resulted in additional general and administrative expense of $0.4 million.
 
Depreciation
 
Depreciation expense remained consistent at $4.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 compared to the year ended December 31, 2007.
 
Amortization of Intangible Assets
 
                 
      Absolute
 Percentage
      Increase
 Increase
  2007 2008 (Decrease) (Decrease)
 
Amortization expense (dollars in millions)
 $1.2  $1.4  $0.2   17%
Amortization expense as a percentage of total revenues
  1%  1%      
 
The increase in amortization expense is primarily attributable to amortization of intangible assets from the acquisition of JupiterResearch on July 31, 2008, offset by a decrease in the amortization of the intangible assets from an acquisition in 2003 that became fully amortized in 2008.
 
Other Income, Net
 
Other income, net decreased 36% to $5.4 million in 2008 from $8.4 million in 2007. The decrease is primarily due to a net foreign exchange loss of $1.6 million resulting primarily from the remeasurement of certain intercompany payables and receivables. Of the loss recognized, $1.9 million related to periods prior to 2008. Also contributing to the decrease in other income was lower interest income primarily attributable to lower returns on invested capital.


23


 

Gains (Losses) on Investments
 
In 2007, we sold approximately 20,000 shares of comScore, Inc., receiving proceeds of approximately $0.7 million and recognizing a gain of approximately $0.6 million related to the sale. In 2008, we sold the remaining 106,000 shares of comScore, receiving proceeds of approximately $2.3 million and recording a gain of approximately $2.0 million related to the sale. In 2007 and 2008, we recognized net losses from our non-marketable investments of approximately $1.6 million and $0.6 million, respectively.
 
Provision for Income Taxes
 
                 
      Absolute
 Percentage
      Increase
 Increase
  2007 2008 (Decrease) (Decrease)
 
Provision for income taxes (dollars in millions)
 $11.1  $15.6  $4.5   41%
 
During 2008, our effective tax rate was 35% compared to 37% in 2007. The decrease in our effective tax rate for 2008 resulted primarily from a decrease in a valuation allowance against foreign deferred tax assets and a decrease in nondeductible expenses including nondeductible stock compensation, partially offset by a decrease in tax exempt investment income.
 
Liquidity and Capital Resources
 
We have financed our operations primarily through funds generated from operations. Memberships for research services, which constituted approximately 68% of our revenues during 2009, are annually renewable and are generally payable in advance. We generated cash from operating activities of $43.1 million during 2009 and $43.7 million during 2008. The slight decrease in cash provided from operations is primarily attributable to a $10.3 million decrease in net income in 2009 that was almost completely offset by changes in working capital and an increase in non-cash depreciation and amortization charges in 2009.
 
During 2009, we used $59.5 million of cash in investing activities, consisting primarily of $33.5 million used for net purchases of marketable investments and a $16.8 million increase in restricted cash. The restricted cash was comprised of $14.8 million placed in escrow under a lease signed in 2009 for leasehold improvements for our new headquarters to be constructed in Cambridge, Massachusetts, as well as $2.0 million of the purchase price placed in escrow in connection our acquisition of Strategic Oxygen in December 2009. Investing activities in 2009 also included $5.6 million for acquisitions of businesses and $4.3 million for purchases of property and equipment. During 2008, we generated $38.6 million of cash from investing activities, consisting primarily of $63.7 million generated from net sales of marketable investments, partially offset by $22.4 million for the acquisition of JupiterResearch and $3.7 million for the purchase of property and equipment. We regularly invest excess funds in short and intermediate-term interest-bearing obligations of investment grade.
 
Our financing activities principally consist of repurchases of our common stock and the issuance of stock under our equity incentive and employee stock purchase plans. During 2009, we used $20.4 million to repurchase stock and received approximately $4.3 million of proceeds from exercises of stock options and our employee stock purchase plan. During 2008, we used $30.4 million to repurchase stock and received approximately $27.1 million of proceeds from exercises of stock options and our employee stock purchase plan. Our Board of Directors has authorized an aggregate $200.0 million to purchase our common stock under a stock repurchase program. As of December 31, 2009, we had cumulatively repurchased approximately 7.0 million shares of common stock at an aggregate cost of approximately $141.3 million. We plan to continue to repurchase our common stock during 2010.
 
As of December 31, 2009, we held approximately $39.5 million ($42.7 million at par value) of state and municipal bonds with an auction reset feature (auction rate securities or “ARS”) whose underlying assets are generally student loans which are substantially backed by the federal government or municipalities. In February 2008, auctions began to fail for these securities. Throughout 2009 auction failures continued and, as a result, our ability to liquidate our investment and fully recover the carrying value of our investment in the near term may be limited or not exist. In November 2008, we accepted an offer (the “Right”) from UBS AG (“UBS”), one of our investment advisors, entitling us to sell at par ARS originally purchased from UBS (approximately $31.7 million, par value) at anytime during a two-year period from June 30, 2010 — July 2, 2012 (“UBS ARS”). We currently


24


 

intend to sell our UBS ARS, valued at $29.6 million at December 31, 2009, to UBS under the Right during the second half of 2010. Based on our expected operating cash flows and our cash resources, we do not anticipate the current lack of liquidity on our ARS investments will affect our ability to execute our current business plan.
 
As of December 31, 2009, we had cash and cash equivalents of $97.8 million and marketable investments of $162.0 million. We do not have a line of credit and do not presently anticipate the need to access a line of credit in the foreseeable future. We plan to continue to introduce new products and services and expect to make the requisite investments in our infrastructure during the next 12 months. We believe that our current cash balance, marketable investments, and cash flows from operations will satisfy working capital, financing activities, and capital expenditure requirements for at least the next two years.
 
As of December 31, 2009, we had future contractual obligations as follows:
 
                             
Contractual
              
Obligations
 Total 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Thereafter
      (In thousands)    
 
Operating leases
 $107,598  $9,487  $7,010  $6,785  $6,391  $6,286  $71,639 
 
Under abuild-to-suitlease entered into on September 29, 2009, whereby the landlord will build a new corporate headquarters for us in Cambridge, Massachusetts, we have committed to construct approximately $14.8 million of leasehold improvements in the building under the terms of the lease. Due to the uncertainty regarding the timing and final amount of the payments, the above table does not include the $14.8 million of future leaseholds. We expect to incur the majority of these costs in 2011. The funding for the leasehold improvements has been placed in an escrow account and is included in restricted cash on the Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2009. The $14.8 million in escrow will be increased or decreased based upon the final estimate of construction costs and will be released from escrow as the leasehold improvements are constructed.
 
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
 
We do not maintain any off-balance sheet financing arrangements.
 
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
 
See Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a full description of recent accounting pronouncements including the respective expected dates of adoption and effects on results of operations and financial condition.
 
Item 7A.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
 
The following discussion about our market risk disclosures involves forward-looking statements. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. We are exposed to market risk related to changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. We do not use derivative financial instruments.
 
The primary objective of our investment activities is to preserve principal while at the same time maximizing the income we receive from our investments without significantly increasing risk. To achieve this objective, we maintain our portfolio of cash equivalents and marketable investments in a variety of securities, including U.S. government agencies, municipal notes which may have an auction reset feature (“auction rate securities” or “ARS”), corporate notes and bonds, commercial paper, and money market funds. The securities, other than money market funds, and the ARS for which we have accepted the Right from UBS, are classified asavailable-for-saleand consequently are recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value with unrealized gains or losses reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. If interest rates rise, the market value of our investments may decline, which could result in a realized loss if we are forced to sell an investment before its scheduled maturity. We have the ability to hold our fixed income investments until maturity (without giving effect to any future acquisitions or mergers). Therefore, we would not expect our operating results or cash flows to be affected to any significant degree by a sudden change in market interest rates on our securities portfolio.


25


 

At December 31, 2009, we held approximately $39.5 million ($42.7 million at par value) of ARS. In February 2008, auctions for these securities began to fail and continued to fail throughout 2009. The Right from UBS, one of our investment advisors, entitles us to sell at par value auction-rate securities originally purchased from UBS at anytime during a two-year period from June 30, 2010 through July 2, 2012 (“UBS ARS”). At December 31, 2009, ARS subject to the Right had a fair value and par value of $29.6 million and $31.7 million, respectively. In accepting the Right, we granted UBS the authority to sell or auction the UBS ARS at par at any time up until the expiration date of the offer and released UBS from any claims relating to the marketing and sale of the UBS ARS. Although we expect to sell our UBS ARS under the Right, if the Right is not exercised before July 2, 2012 it will expire and UBS will have no further rights or obligation to buy our ARS. In lieu of our acceptance of the Right, the UBS ARS will continue to accrue and pay interest as determined by the auction process or the terms specified in the prospectus of the UBS ARS if the auction process fails. The value of the Right may largely offset the decline in fair value of the UBS ARS. We valued the Right as a put option asset using a discounted cash flow approach including estimates of interest rates, timing and amount of cash flow, adjusted for any bearer risk associated with UBS’s financial ability to repurchase the UBS ARS beginning June 30, 2010. The combined fair value of the right and the UBS ARS is equal to the par value of the UBS ARS. The assumptions used in valuing both the UBS ARS and the put option are volatile and subject to change as the underlying sources of these assumptions and market conditions change, which could result in significant changes to their fair value. The remaining $9.9 million ($11.0 at par value) of ARS may not be accessible for in excess of twelve months because of continued failed auctions and have been classified in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as long-term marketable investments as of December 31, 2009. Based on current market conditions, it is likely that auction failures will continue and as a result, our ability to liquidate our investment and fully recover the carrying value of our investment in the near term may be limited or not exist. If the issuers are unable to successfully close future auctions and their credit ratings deteriorate, we may in the future be required to record an impairment charge on these investments. We valued the ARS using a discounted cash flow model. The assumptions used in preparing the discounted cash flow model include estimates of interest rates, timing and amount of cash flows, credit and liquidity premiums, and expected holding periods of the ARS, based on data available at December 31, 2009. The assumptions used in valuing these ARS are volatile and subject to change as the underlying sources of these assumptions and market conditions change, which could result in significant changes to the fair value of these ARS
 
The following table provides information about our investment portfolio (excluding the value of the Right of $2.1 million). For investment securities, the table presents principal cash flows and related weighted-average interest rates by expected maturity dates.
 
Principal amounts by expected maturity or auction reset dates in U.S. dollars (dollars in thousands):
 
             
  Years Ended
 
  December 31, 
  2010  2011  2012 
 
State and municipal agency obligations
 $69,301  $16,096  $ 
Federal agency and corporate obligations
  34,827   30,047   9,616 
             
Total investments
 $104,128  $46,143  $9,616 
Weighted average interest rates
  1.63%  1.56%  1.77%
 
Foreign Currency Exchange.  On a global level, we face exposure to movements in foreign currency exchange rates. This exposure may change over time as business practices evolve and could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations. To date, the effect of changes in currency exchange rates has not had a significant impact on our financial position or our results of operations. Accordingly, we have not entered into any hedging agreements. However, we may enter into hedging agreements in the future to attempt to mitigate the financial effect of future fluctuations in the euro or other foreign currencies. As of December 31, 2009, the total assets, excluding goodwill and intangible assets, related tonon-U.S. dollardenominated currencies were approximately $66.2 million.


26


 

Item 8.  Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
 
The financial statements listed in the following Index to Financial Statements are filed as a part of this 2009 Annual Report onForm 10-K.
 
FORRESTER RESEARCH, INC.
 
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
     
  Page
 
  F-1 
  F-2 
  F-3 
  F-4 
  F-5 
  F-6 


27


 

 
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
Board of Directors and Shareholders
Forrester Research, Inc.
Cambridge, MA
 
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Forrester Research, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
 
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
 
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Forrester Research, Inc. and subsidiaries at December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
 
As described in Note 6 of the consolidated financial statements, effective January 1, 2007, the company adopted accounting standards related to uncertainty in income taxes.
 
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) and our report dated March 12, 2010 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
 
/s/  BDO Seidman, LLP
 
Boston, Massachusetts
March 12, 2010


F-1


 

FORRESTER RESEARCH, INC.
 
 
         
  December 31, 
  2008  2009 
  (In thousands, except
 
  per share data) 
 
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
        
Cash and cash equivalents
 $129,478  $97,805 
Marketable investments (Note 4)
  83,951   152,037 
Accounts receivable, net (Note 12)
  64,226   67,436 
Deferred income taxes (Note 6)
  7,947   5,276 
Deferred commissions
  9,749   9,631 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
  15,553   8,616 
         
Total current assets
  310,904   340,801 
Long-term marketable securities (Note 4)
  46,500   9,950 
Restricted cash (Notes 2 and 7)
     16,770 
Property and equipment, net (Note 12)
  6,759   5,823 
Deferred income taxes (Note 6)
  8,523   10,323 
Goodwill (Note 3)
  67,424   68,314 
Intangible assets, net (Note 3)
  7,138   12,108 
Non-marketable investments (Note 5)
  7,000   5,546 
Other assets
  703   561 
         
Total assets
 $454,951  $470,196 
         
 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
        
Accounts payable
 $3,532  $2,078 
Accrued expenses (Note 12)
  27,527   30,168 
Deferred revenue
  113,844   117,888 
         
Total current liabilities
  144,903   150,134 
Non-current liabilities
  6,551   8,117 
         
Total liabilities
  151,454   158,251 
         
COMMITMENTS (NOTE 7)
        
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (NOTE 8):
        
Preferred stock, $.01 par value
        
Authorized — 500 shares, issued and outstanding — none
      
Common stock, $.01 par value
        
Authorized — 125,000 shares
        
Issued — 29,146 and 29,362 in 2008 and 2009, respectively
        
Outstanding — 23,045 and 22,334 in 2008 and 2009, respectively
  291   294 
Additional paid-in capital
  315,149   325,207 
Retained earnings
  110,693   129,559 
Treasury stock — 6,101 and 7,028 in 2008 and 2009 respectively, at cost
  (120,851)  (141,250)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
  (1,785)  (1,865)
         
Total stockholders’ equity
  303,497   311,945 
         
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
 $454,951  $470,196 
         
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


F-2


 

FORRESTER RESEARCH, INC.
 
 
             
  Years Ended December 31, 
  2007  2008  2009 
  (In thousands, except per share data) 
 
REVENUES:
            
Research services
 $131,163  $155,339  $157,726 
Advisory services and other
  80,893   85,536   75,626 
             
Total revenues
  212,056   240,875   233,352 
             
OPERATING EXPENSES:
            
Cost of services and fulfillment
  81,608   87,802   84,266 
Selling and marketing
  71,830   79,944   76,094 
General and administrative
  30,749   29,723   28,461 
Depreciation
  3,986   4,007   4,380 
Amortization of intangible assets
  1,232   1,435   2,290 
Reorganization costs
        5,441 
             
Total operating expenses
  189,405   202,911   200,932 
             
Income from operations
  22,651   37,964   32,420 
Other income, net
  8,372   5,373   2,297 
Gains (losses) on investments, net
  (1,019)  1,473   (982)
             
Income before income taxes
  30,004   44,810   33,735 
Income tax provision
  11,061   15,595   14,869 
             
Net income
 $18,943  $29,215  $18,866 
             
Basic income per common share
 $0.82  $1.27  $0.83 
             
Diluted income per common share
 $0.80  $1.24  $0.82 
             
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding
  23,074   23,062   22,645 
             
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding
  23,729   23,585   22,884 
             
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


F-3


 

FORRESTER RESEARCH, INC.
 
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
 
                                     
                    Accumulated
       
  Common Stock  Additional
     Treasury Stock  Other
  Total
    
  Number of
  $.01 Par
  Paid-in
  Retained
  Number of
     Comprehensive
  Stockholders’
  Comprehensive
 
  Shares  Value  Capital  Earnings  Shares  Cost  (Loss)  Equity  Income 
  (In thousands) 
 
Balance, December 31, 2006
  27,884  $279  $270,306  $62,766   4,839  $(85,834) $(2,612) $244,905     
Cumulative effect of adoption of accounting for uncertain tax positions
           (231)           (231)    
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of options and under stock purchase plan, including tax benefit
  281   3   5,800               5,803     
Stock-based compensation expense
        8,325               8,325     
Purchase of common stock
              172   (4,594)     (4,594)    
Net income
           18,943            18,943  $18,943 
Unrealized gain on marketable investments, net of tax
                    2,196   2,196   2,196 
Cumulative translation adjustment
                    (331)  (331)  (331)
                                     
Total comprehensive income
                                 $20,808 
                                     
Balance, December 31, 2007
  28,165   282   284,431   81,478   5,011   (90,428)  (747)  275,016     
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of options and under stock purchase plan, including tax benefit
  981   9   25,429               25,438     
Stock-based compensation expense
        5,289               5,289     
Purchase of common stock
              1,090   (30,423)     (30,423)    
Net income
           29,215            29,215  $29,215 
Unrealized loss on marketable investments, net of tax
                    (1,724)  (1,724)  (1,724)
Cumulative translation adjustment
                    686   686   686 
                                     
Total comprehensive income
                                 $28,177 
                                     
Balance, December 31, 2008
  29,146   291   315,149   110,693   6,101   (120,851)  (1,785)  303,497     
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of options and under stock purchase plan, including tax benefit
  216   3   4,013               4,016     
Stock-based compensation expense
        6,045               6,045     
Purchase of common stock
              927   (20,399)     (20,399)    
Net income
           18,866            18,866  $18,866 
Unrealized loss on marketable investments, net of tax
                    (440)  (440)  (440)
Cumulative translation adjustment
                    360   360   360 
                                     
Total comprehensive income
                                 $18,786 
                                     
Balance, December 31, 2009
  29,362  $294  $325,207  $129,559   7,028  $(141,250) $(1,865) $311,945     
                                     
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


F-4


 

FORRESTER RESEARCH, INC.
 
 
             
  Years Ended December 31, 
  2007  2008  2009 
  (In thousands) 
 
Cash flows from operating activities:
            
Net income
 $18,943  $29,215  $18,866 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
            
Depreciation and asset write-offs
  3,986   4,007   5,278 
Amortization of intangible assets
  1,232   1,435   2,290 
Net losses (gains) from investments
  1,019   (1,473)  982 
Deferred income taxes
  6,878   1,503   1,943 
Stock-based compensation
  8,326   5,358   6,111 
Amortization of premium on investments
  607   870   1,167 
Foreign currency losses
     1,611   1,107 
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions
            
Accounts receivable
  (9,486)  7,400   (2,090)
Deferred commissions
  (514)  881   119 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
  (3,552)  (4,184)  7,092 
Accounts payable
  1,171   (893)  (2,342)
Accrued expenses
  (315)  (2,289)  (69)
Deferred revenue
  9,841   211   2,645 
             
Net cash provided by operating activities
  38,136   43,652   43,099 
             
Cash flows from investing activities:
            
Acquisitions
     (22,406)  (5,592)
Purchases of property and equipment
  (5,106)  (3,698)  (4,284)
Purchases of marketable investments
  (1,240,584)  (1,224,793)  (645,312)
Proceeds from sales and maturities of marketable investments
  1,217,367   1,288,532   611,859 
Increase in restricted cash
        (16,770)
Other investing activity
  3,036   937   558 
             
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
  (25,287)  38,572   (59,541)
             
Cash flows from financing activities:
            
Proceeds from issuance of common stock under employee equity incentive plans and employee stock purchase plan
  4,896   18,577   4,282 
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation
  101   8,476    
Repurchases of common stock
  (4,594)  (30,423)  (20,399)
             
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
  403   (3,370)  (16,117)
             
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
  754   (2,539)  886 
             
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
  14,006   76,315   (31,673)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year
  39,157   53,163   129,478 
             
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year
 $53,163  $129,478  $97,805 
             
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
            
Cash paid for taxes
 $3,719  $7,992  $10,945 
             
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


F-5


 

 
FORRESTER RESEARCH, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009
 
(1)  Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
 
Basis of Presentation
 
Principles of Consolidation
 
Forrester Research, Inc. (“Forrester” or “the Company”) conducts independent research and provides pragmatic and forward-thinking advice to global leaders in business and technology. Forrester’s products and services are targeted to specific roles, including principally senior management, business strategists, and marketing and technology professionals at $1 billion-plus revenue companies who collaborate with Forrester to align their technology investments with their business goals. The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Forrester and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
 
Management Estimates
 
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Forrester considers the more significant of these estimates to be revenue recognition, stock-based compensation, allowance for doubtful accounts, non-marketable investments, goodwill and intangible assets, income taxes and valuation and impairment of marketable investments. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates its estimates. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
 
Reclassifications
 
Certain items in the prior year’s consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.
 
Fair Value Measurements
 
Effective January 1, 2009, the Company adopted a newly issued accounting standard for fair value measurements of all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities not recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis. The adoption of the accounting standard for these assets and liabilities did not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
 
Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted a newly issued accounting standard for fair value measurements for our financial assets and liabilities that are re-measured and reported at fair value at each reporting period, and non-financial assets and liabilities that are re-measured and reported at fair value at least annually. The adoption of the accounting standard did not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
 
The Company has certain financial assets recorded at fair value which have been classified as Level 1, 2 or 3 within the fair value hierarchy as described in the accounting standards for fair value measurements.
 
Level 1 — Fair value based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
 
Level 2 — Fair value based on inputs other than Level 1 inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
 
Level 3 — Fair value based on unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and such inputs are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.


F-6


 

 
FORRESTER RESEARCH, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
The carrying amounts reflected in the Consolidated Balance Sheets for cash, cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and accrued expenses approximate fair value due to their short-term maturities.
 
Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Marketable Investments
 
Forrester considers all short-term, highly liquid investments with original maturities at the time of purchase of 90 days or less to be cash equivalents. The Company’s investments with an auction reset feature and for which the Company does not have the ability to sell within one year from the balance sheet date are classified as long-term investments.
 
The Company’s investments are comprised of securities of U.S. government agencies, municipal notes some of which mature on auction reset feature (Auction Rate Securities or ARS), corporate notes and bonds, commercial paper and money market funds meeting certain criteria. Forrester accounts for all marketable investments, except for ARS subject to the right offering with UBS as discussed further in Note 4, asavailable-for-salesecurities and as such are carried at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses (not related to credit losses) recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Realized gains and losses on securities are included in earnings and are determined using the specific identification method. The Company conducts periodic reviews to identify and evaluate each investment that has an unrealized loss, in accordance with the meaning ofother-than-temporaryimpairment and its application to certain investments, as required under current accounting standards. An unrealized loss exists when the current fair value of an individual security is less than its amortized cost basis. Unrealized losses onavailable-for-salesecurities that are determined to be temporary, and not related to credit loss, are recorded, net of tax, in accumulated other comprehensive loss. The determination of whether a loss is considered temporary is based in part on whether the Company intends to sell the security or whether the Company would more likely than not be required to sell the security before the expected recovery of the amortized cost basis. During the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009 the Company did not record anyother-than-temporaryimpairment charges on itsavailable-for-salesecurities.
 
During the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company reclassified ARS held by UBS fromavailable-for-saleto trading securities. Investments that the Company designates as trading assets are reported at fair value, with gains or losses resulting from changes in fair value recognized in other income, net, in the Consolidated Statements of Income. See Note 4.
 
Concentrations of Credit Risk
 
Forrester has no significant off-balance sheet or concentration of credit risk such as foreign exchange contracts, option contracts, or other foreign hedging arrangements. Financial instruments that potentially subject Forrester to concentrations of credit risk are principally cash equivalents, marketable investments, and accounts receivable. Forrester places its investments in highly rated securities. No single customer accounted for greater than 2% of revenues or accounts receivable in any of the periods presented.
 
Deferred Commissions
 
Commissions incurred in acquiring new or renewing existing contracts are deferred and expensed to operations as the related revenue is recognized. Forrester evaluates the recoverability of deferred commissions at each balance sheet date.
 
Goodwill
 
Goodwill is not amortized; however, it is required to be tested for impairment annually using a fair value approach at the reporting unit level. Furthermore, testing for impairment is required on an interim basis if an event or circumstance indicates that it is more likely than not an impairment loss has been incurred. An impairment loss shall be recognized to the extent that the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value. Absent an event that indicates a specific impairment may exist, the Company has selected November 30th as the date for performing the annual goodwill impairment test. Goodwill impairment charges have not been required for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009.


F-7


 

 
FORRESTER RESEARCH, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
Impairment of Other Long-Lived Tangible and Intangible Assets
 
Forrester continually evaluates whether events or circumstances have occurred that indicate that the estimated remaining useful life of long-lived assets and intangible assets may warrant revision or if events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of these assets may be impaired. To compute whether assets have been impaired, the estimated undiscounted future cash flows for the estimated remaining useful life of the assets are compared to the carrying value. To the extent that the future cash flows are less than the carrying value, the assets are written down to the estimated fair value of the asset.
 
Foreign Currency
 
The functional currency of the majority of Forrester’s wholly-owned subsidiaries is their respective local currencies. These subsidiary financial statements are translated to United States dollars using period-end exchange rates for assets and liabilities and average exchange rates during the corresponding period for revenues and expenses, with translation gains and losses accumulated as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss. Gains and losses related to the remeasurement of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in a currency other than an entity’s functional currency (principally certain intercompany payables and receivables) are included in other income, net in the Consolidated Statements of Income. Forrester recorded net foreign exchange losses in other income, net related to remeasurement of intercompany transactions of $1.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2008, of which $1.9 million related to prior years. For the year ended December 31, 2009, Forrester recorded $1.1 million of foreign exchange losses in other income, net. In addition, Forrester’s German holding companies, for which the functional currency is the United States dollar, recognized $0.8 million, $0.6 million and $(0.6) million of remeasurement gains (losses) on its deferred tax liability in income tax expense for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively.
 
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
 
The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss as of December 31, 2008 and 2009 are as follows (in thousands):
 
         
  2008  2009 
 
Net unrealized gain (loss) on marketable investments, net of taxes
 $365  $(75)
Cumulative translation adjustment
  (2,150)  (1,790)
         
Total accumulated other comprehensive loss
 $(1,785) $(1,865)
         
 
The components of comprehensive income are as follows (in thousands):
 
             
  Years Ended December 31, 
  2007  2008  2009 
 
Net income
 $18,943  $29,215  $18,866 
Cumulative translation adjustment
  (331)  686   360 
Unrealized gain (loss) on marketable investments:
            
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on marketable investments, net of taxes
  2,552   (4,699)  (440)
Reclassification adjustment for realized gains in net income, net of taxes
  (356)  (1,095)   
Reclassification adjustment for realized loss from transfer of ARS fromavailable-for-salesecurities to trading securities, net of taxes
     4,070    
             
Total comprehensive income
 $20,808  $28,177  $18,786 
             


F-8


 

 
FORRESTER RESEARCH, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
Revenue Recognition
 
Forrester generates revenues from licensing research, performing advisory services and consulting projects, hosting events and conducting teleconferences. Forrester executes contracts that govern the terms and conditions of each arrangement. Revenues from contracts that contain multiple deliverables are allocated among the separate units based on their relative fair values; however, the amount recognized is limited to the amount that is not contingent on future performance conditions. Research service revenues are recognized ratably over the term of the agreement. Advisory service revenues are recognized during the period in which the customer receives the agreed upon deliverable and consulting project revenues, which are short-term in nature and based upon fixed-fee agreements, are recognized as the services are provided. Losses on consulting project contracts are recognized in the period in which the loss first becomes probable and reasonably estimable. Forrester teleconferences revenue and reimbursedout-of-pocketexpenses are recorded as advisory service revenues. Events revenues are recognized upon completion of the event. Annual memberships that include access to research, unlimited phone or email analyst inquiry, unlimited participation in Forrester teleconferences, and the right to attend one event, are accounted for as one unit of accounting and recognized ratably as research services revenue over the membership period. Clients are offered a service guarantee, which gives them the right to cancel their contracts prior to the end of the contract term and receive a refund for unused products or services.
 
Stock-Based Compensation
 
Forrester recognizes the fair value of stock-based compensation in net income over the requisite service period of the individual grantee, which generally equals the vesting period. Cash flows resulting from the tax benefits of tax deductions in excess of the compensation expense recognized for stock-based awards are classified as financing cash flows. The Company is required to estimate future forfeitures of stock-based awards for recognition of compensation expense. The Company will record additional expense if the actual forfeitures are lower than estimated and will record a recovery of prior recognized expense if the actual forfeitures are higher than estimated. The actual expense recognized over the vesting period will only be for those awards that vest.
 
Forrester recorded approximately $8.3 million, $5.4 million and $6.1 million of stock-based compensation expense in the following expense categories for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively, (in thousands):
 
             
  Year Ended
  Year Ended
  Year Ended
 
  December 31,
  December 31,
  December 31,
 
  2007  2008  2009 
 
Cost of services and fulfillment
 $4,245  $2,776  $2,961 
Selling and marketing
  1,730   988   1,123 
General and administrative
  2,351   1,594   2,027 
             
Total
 $8,326  $5,358  $6,111 
             
 
The options granted under the equity incentive plans and shares subject to the employee stock purchase plan were valued utilizing the Black Scholes model using the following assumptions and had the following fair values:
 
                     
  Years Ended December 31, 
  2007  2008  2009 
  Equity Incentive
  Equity Incentive
  Employee Stock
  Equity Incentive
  Employee Stock
 
  Plans  Plans  Purchase Plan  Plans  Purchase Plan 
 
Average risk-free interest rate
  4.50%  2.59%  2.41%  1.85%  0.29%
Expected dividend yield
  None   None   None   None   None 
Expected life
  3.24 Years   3.5 Years   0.5 Years   3.5 Years   0.5 Years 
Expected volatility
  35%  35%  35%  44%  44%
Weighted average fair value
 $8.28  $8.00  $7.27  $8.38  $6.81 


F-9


 

 
FORRESTER RESEARCH, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
No shares under the employee stock purchase plan were issued in 2007. The dividend yield of zero is based on the fact that Forrester had never paid cash dividends and had no intention to pay regular cash dividends as of the grant date. Expected volatility is based, in part, on the historical volatility of Forrester’s common stock as well as management’s expectations of future volatility over the expected term of the awards granted. The risk-free interest rate used is based on the U.S. Treasury Constant Maturity rate with an equivalent remaining term. Where the expected term of a stock-based award does not correspond with a term for which the interest rates are quoted, Forrester uses the rate with the maturity closest to the award’s expected term. The expected term calculation is based upon Forrester’s historical experience of exercise patterns. The unamortized fair value of stock-based awards as of December 31, 2009 was $4.6 million, with a weighted average remaining recognition period of 1.55 years.
 
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
 
Forrester maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our customers to make contractually obligated payments. When evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts, the Company makes judgments regarding the collectability of accounts receivable by specifically analyzing historical bad debts, customer concentrations, current economic trends, and changes in the customer payment terms. If the financial condition of the Company’s customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required and if the financial condition of the Company’s customers were to improve, the allowances may be reduced accordingly.
 
Depreciation and Amortization
 
Forrester provides for depreciation and amortization of property and equipment, computed using the straight-line method, over estimated useful lives of assets as follows:
 
   
  Estimated
  
Useful Life
 
Computers and equipment
 2 to 5 Years
Computer software
 3 Years
Furniture and fixtures
 7 Years
Leasehold improvements
 Shorter of life of the asset or term of lease
 
Forrester provides for amortization of intangible assets, computed using an accelerated method according to the expected cash flows to be received from the underlying assets over the respective lives as follows:
 
   
  Estimated
  Useful
  
Life
 
Customer relationships
 5 to 11 Years
Research content
 1 to 2 Years
Registered trademarks
 1 Year
Technology
 7 Years
 
Income Taxes
 
Forrester recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial statements and tax basis of assets and liabilities as well as operating loss carryforwards.
 
Forrester’s provision for income taxes is comprised of a current and a deferred provision for federal, state and foreign jurisdictions. The current provision is calculated as the estimated taxes payable or refundable on tax returns for the current year. The deferred income tax provision is calculated as the net change during the year in deferred tax


F-10


 

 
FORRESTER RESEARCH, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
assets and liabilities. Valuation allowances are provided if, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized.
 
Forrester accounts for uncertain tax positions using a “more-likely-than-not” threshold for recognizing and resolving uncertain tax positions. The evaluation of uncertain tax positions is based on factors including, but not limited to, changes in tax law, the measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in tax returns, the effective settlement of matters subject to audit, new audit activity, and changes in facts or circumstances related to a tax position. The Company evaluates these tax positions on a quarterly basis. The Company also accrues for potential interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense.
 
Net Income Per Common Share
 
Basic income per common share is computed by dividing net income by the basic weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per common share is computed by dividing net income by the diluted weighted average number of common shares and common equivalent shares outstanding during the period. The weighted average number of common equivalent shares outstanding has been determined in accordance with the treasury-stock method. Common stock equivalents consist of common stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding stock options.
 
Basic and diluted weighted average common shares are as follows:
 
             
  Years Ended December 31, 
  2007  2008  2009 
  (In thousands) 
 
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding
  23,074   23,062   22,645 
Weighted average common equivalent shares
  655   523   239 
             
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding
  23,729   23,585   22,884 
             
 
As of December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009, options to purchase approximately 1.3 million, 1.5 million and 2.0 million shares, respectively, were outstanding but not included in the diluted weighted average common share calculation as the effect would have been anti-dilutive.
 
New Accounting Pronouncements
 
In September 2009, the FASB issued UpdateNo. 2009-13,“Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements — a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force” (ASU2009-13). It updates the existing multiple-element revenue arrangements guidance currently included under ASC605-25,which originated primarily from the guidance in EITF IssueNo. 00-21,“Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables”(EITF 00-21).The revised guidance primarily provides two significant changes: 1) eliminates the need for objective and reliable evidence of the fair value for the undelivered element in order for a delivered item to be treated as a separate unit of accounting, and 2) eliminates the residual method to allocate the arrangement consideration. In addition, the guidance also expands the disclosure requirements for revenue recognition. ASU2009-13 will be effective for the first annual reporting period beginning on or after June 15, 2010, with early adoption permitted provided that the revised guidance is retroactively applied to the beginning of the year of adoption. The Company is currently assessing the future impact of this new accounting update to its consolidated financial statements.
 
(2)  Acquisitions
 
Effective January 1, 2009, the Company adopted a new accounting standard update regarding business combinations. This update requires an entity to recognize the assets acquired, liabilities assumed, contractual contingencies, and contingent consideration at their fair value on the acquisition date. It further requires that acquisition-related costs be recognized separately from the acquisition and expensed as incurred; that restructuring


F-11


 

 
FORRESTER RESEARCH, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
costs generally be expensed in periods subsequent to the acquisition date; and that changes in accounting for deferred tax asset valuation allowances and acquired income tax uncertainties after the measurement period be recognized as a component of provision for taxes. The adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
 
Strategic Oxygen
 
On December 1, 2009, Forrester acquired the Strategic Oxygen business to further support Forrester’s syndicated business model and the Company’s role-based strategy. The total purchase price was approximately $7.3 million, of which approximately $4.6 million was paid on the acquisition date, $0.5 million was paid in February 2010 and $0.4 million is payable in June 2011 subject to reduction for indemnification claims. The remaining purchase price of $1.8 million represented contingent purchase price valued as of December 1, 2009, which was subject to adjustment based on the achievement of certain financial metrics related to the acquired business. Of the $1.8 million contingent purchase price, $0.2 million was paid in December 2009 and $1.2 million was paid by February 2010 as full consideration. At December 31, 2009, the Company maintained approximately $2.0 million in an escrow account classified as restricted cash in the Consolidated Balance Sheets related to the contingent purchase price. The results of Strategic Oxygen, which were not material to the consolidated financial statements, have been included in Forrester’s consolidated financial statements since December 1, 2009 in the Technology Industry Client Group segment. Pro forma financial information has not been provided as it is not material to the consolidated results of operations.
 
Forrester Middle East FZ-LLC
 
On January 22, 2009, Forrester acquired all of the outstanding share capital of Forrester Middle East FZ-LLC (FME), a Dubai, UAE based reseller of Forrester’s products that also offered consulting services to local customers, to expand the Company’s direct geographical presence in the area. The total purchase price was approximately $1.1 million of which approximately $0.6 million was paid on the acquisition date, $0.2 million was paid in the three months ended June 30, 2009 and $0.3 million was contingent upon the acquired company meeting certain financial metrics, which were not met and accordingly the final $0.3 million was not required to be paid by Forrester. The results of FME’s operations, which were not material to the consolidated financial statements, have been included in Forrester’s consolidated financial statements since January 22, 2009, with the revenue included within the client group segment to which it relates. Pro forma financial information has not been provided as it is not material to the consolidated results of operations.


F-12


 

 
FORRESTER RESEARCH, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
A summary of the purchase price allocation for Strategic Oxygen and FME is as follows (in thousands):
 
     
Assets:
    
Accounts receivable
 $1,972 
Prepaid expenses
  33 
Property and equipment
  26 
Goodwill
  1,409 
Intangible assets
  7,261 
     
Total assets
  10,701 
     
Liabilities:
    
Accounts payable
  387 
Accrued expenses
  1,471 
Deferred revenue
  450 
     
Total liabilities
  2,308 
     
Net assets acquired
 $8,393 
     
 
A portion of the goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes.
 
Intangible assets are amortized according to the expected cash flows to be received. The following are the identifiable intangible assets acquired and their respective weighted average lives (dollars in thousands):
 
         
     Useful
 
  Assigned
  Life
 
  Value  (In Years) 
 
Customer relationships
 $2,958   10 
Technology
  1,507   7 
Research content
  2,500   1 
Trademarks and other
  296   1 
         
  $7,261     
         
 
On July 31, 2008, Forrester acquired all of the outstanding capital stock of JUPR Holdings, Inc., (“Holdings”) the parent company of JupiterResearch, LLC (“JupiterResearch”). JupiterResearch provided business professionals with syndicated research, analysis, and advice backed by proprietary data. The acquisition supported the Company’s role-based strategy and added greater depth and breadth to the marketing and strategy syndicated product offering, increased the number of client companies and was expected to reduce operating expenses of the combined entity through economies of scale. The total consideration was $22.0 million which consisted of initial cash consideration of $23.0 million less a working capital adjustment of $1.0 million which was received in the fourth quarter of 2008. The aggregate purchase price of $22.6 million consisted of $22.0 million for the acquisition of all outstanding shares of Holdings common stock, $0.4 million of direct acquisition costs and $0.2 million for severance related to 14 employees of JupiterResearch terminated as a result of the acquisition. The results of JupiterResearch’s operations have been included in Forrester’s consolidated financial statements since July 31, 2008 in the Marketing and Strategy Client Group segment. Pro forma financial information has not been provided as it is not material to the consolidated results of operations.


F-13


 

 
FORRESTER RESEARCH, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
A summary of the purchase price allocation for JupiterResearch is as follows (in thousands):
 
     
Assets:
    
Accounts receivable
 $2,636 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
  500 
Property and equipment, net
  398 
Deferred tax asset, net
  1,738 
Goodwill
  14,807 
Intangible assets
  8,267 
     
Total assets
  28,346 
     
Liabilities:
    
Accounts payable
  419 
Accrued expenses
  996 
Deferred revenue
  4,378 
     
Total liabilities
  5,793 
     
Net assets acquired
 $22,553 
     
 
A portion of the goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes.
 
(3)  Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
 
A summary of the goodwill by segment and the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the Information Technology Client Group (“IT”), Technology Industry Client Group (“TI”), Marketing and Strategy Client Group (“M&S”) and Events segments is as follows (in thousands):
 
                     
  IT  TI  M&S  Events  Total 
 
Balance, December 31, 2007
 $23,001  $24,104  $4,598  $1,974  $53,677 
Acquisition of JupiterResearch
        15,404      15,404 
Purchase accounting adjustments(1)
  (472)  (494)  (94)  (40)  (1,100)
Translation adjustments
  (238)  (250)  (48)  (21)  (557)
                     
Balance, December 31, 2008
  22,291   23,360   19,860   1,913   67,424 
Acquistions
  7   1,395   6   1   1,409 
Purchase accounting adjustments(2)
        (597)     (597)
Translation adjustments
  26   27   23   2   78 
                     
Balance, December 31, 2009
 $22,324  $24,782  $19,292  $1,916  $68,314 
                     
 
 
(1) The Company reduced goodwill for the utilization or anticipated utilization of acquired net operating losses for which a valuation allowance was recorded at the acquisition date.
 
(2) Adjustments relate to the finalization of the JupiterResearch acquisition on July 31, 2009, primarily relating to tax attributes that were finalized in the first quarter of 2009.
 
As of December 31, 2009, the Company had no accumulated goodwill impairment losses.


F-14


 

 
FORRESTER RESEARCH, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
A summary of Forrester’s intangible assets as of December 31, 2008 and 2009 is as follows:
 
             
  December 31, 2008 
  Gross
     Net
 
  Carrying
  Accumulated
  Carrying
 
  Amount  Amortization  Amount 
  (In thousands) 
 
Amortizable intangible assets:
            
Customer relationships
 $27,239  $20,862  $6,377 
Research content
  3,560   2,909   651 
Trademarks
  802   692   110 
             
Total
 $31,601  $24,463  $7,138 
             
 
             
  December 31, 2009 
  Gross
     Net
 
  Carrying
  Accumulated
  Carrying
 
  Amount  Amortization  Amount 
  (In thousands) 
 
Amortizable intangible assets:
            
Customer relationships
 $30,478  $22,398  $8,080 
Research content
  6,060   3,727   2,333 
Technology
  1,507   16   1,491 
Trademarks
  876   808   68 
Other
  223   87   136 
             
Total
 $39,144  $27,036  $12,108 
             
 
Amortization expense related to intangible assets was approximately $1.2 million, $1.4 million and $2.3 million during the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively. Estimated amortization expense related to intangible assets that will continue to be amortized is as follows (in thousands):
 
     
Year ending December 31, 2010
 $3,622 
Year ending December 31, 2011
  1,773 
Year ending December 31, 2012
  1,241 
Year ending December 31, 2013
  1,128 
Year ending December 31, 2014
  1,034 
Thereafter
  3,310 
     
Total
 $12,108 
     


F-15


 

 
FORRESTER RESEARCH, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
 
(4)  Marketable Investments
 
The following table summarizes the Company’s marketable investments (in thousands):
 
                 
     Gross
  Gross
    
  Amortized
  Unrealized
  Unrealized
  Market
 
  Cost  Gains  Losses  Value 
 
December 31, 2008
                
Available-for-salesecurities
                
State and municipal obligations
 $70,455  $701  $  $71,156 
Federal agency and corporate obligations(1)
  83,550   64   (86)  83,528 
                 
Total short-termavailable-for-salesecurities
  154,005   765   (86)  154,684 
Non-UBS ARS, long-term
  11,000         11,000 
                 
Totalavailable-for-salesecurities
  165,005   765   (86)  165,684 
Trading securities
                
UBS ARS
  35,500      (6,887)  28,613 
UBS Right
     6,887      6,887 
                 
Total securities
 $200,505  $7,652  $(6,973) $201,184 
                 
 
                 
     Gross
  Gross
    
  Amortized
  Unrealized
  Unrealized
  Market
 
  Cost  Gains  Losses  Value 
 
December 31, 2009
                
Available-for-salesecurities
                
State and municipal obligations
 $45,392  $482  $(2) $45,872 
Federal agency and corporate obligations
  73,992   498      74,490 
                 
Total short-termavailable-for-salesecurities
  119,384   980   (2)  120,362 
Non-UBS ARS
  11,000      (1,050)  9,950 
                 
Totalavailable-for-salesecurities
  130,384   980   (1,052)  130,312 
Trading securities
                
UBS ARS
  31,675      (2,100)  29,575 
UBS Right
     2,100      2,100 
                 
Total securities
 $162,059  $3,080  $(3,152) $161,987 
                 
 
 
(1) $70.7 million of marketable investments with an original maturity of less than 90 days is included in cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 2008.
 
In 2007, Forrester owned an approximate 1.2% ownership interest in comScore, Inc. (“comScore”), a provider of infrastructure services which utilizes proprietary technology to accumulate comprehensive information on consumer buying behavior. In June 2007, comScore (NASDAQ: SCOR) completed an initial public offering in which Forrester’s ownership interest was converted to approximately 126,000 shares. In December 2007, Forrester sold approximately 20,000 shares for proceeds of approximately $0.7 million and recognized a gain of approximately $0.6 million. In 2008, Forrester sold the remaining 106,000 shares of comScore for proceeds of approximately $2.3 million and recognized a gain of approximately $2.0 million.


F-16


 

 
FORRESTER RESEARCH, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
The following table summarizes the maturity periods of the marketable securities in the Company’s portfolio as of December 31, 2009. In February 2008, certain ARS that Forrester held experienced failed auctions that limited the liquidity of these securities. These auction failures have continued throughout 2009 and based on current market conditions, it is likely that auction failures will continue. The following table reflects the ARS at their current auction reset dates. The actual contractual maturities of these investments were they not to reset would occur at various dates between 2016 and 2041 with $0.3 million maturing in five to ten years and $39.2 million maturing after ten years.
 
                 
  FY 2010  FY 2011  FY2012  Total 
  (In thousands) 
 
Federal agency and corporate obligations
 $34,827  $30,047  $9,616  $74,490 
Non-ARS state and municipal obligations
  29,776   16,096      45,872 
UBS ARS
  29,575         29,575 
Non-UBS ARS
  9,950         9,950 
UBS Right
  2,100         2,100 
                 
Total
 $106,228  $46,143  $9,616  $161,987 
                 
 
The following table shows the gross unrealized losses and market value of Forrester’savailable-for-saleinvestments with unrealized losses that are not deemed to beother-than-temporarilyimpaired, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position (in thousands):
 
                 
  As of December 31, 2008 
  Less Than 12 Months  12 Months or Greater 
  Market
  Unrealized
  Market
  Unrealized
 
  Value  Losses  Value  Losses 
 
Federal agency and corporate obligations
 $8,533  $86  $  $ 
                 
 
                 
  As of December 31, 2009 
  Less Than 12 Months  12 Months or Greater 
  Market
  Unrealized
  Market
  Unrealized
 
  Value  Losses  Value  Losses 
 
State and municipal bonds
 $1,148  $2  $  $ 
Non-UBS ARS
  11,000   1,050       
                 
Total
 $12,148  $1,052  $  $ 
                 
 
In November 2008, the Company accepted an offer (the “Right”) from UBS AG (“UBS”), one of its investment advisors, entitling the Company to sell at par value auction-rate securities originally purchased from UBS ($29.6 million fair value and $31.7 million par value at December 31, 2009) at any time during a two-year period from June 30, 2010 through July 2, 2012 (“UBS ARS”). In accepting the Right, the Company also granted UBS the authority to sell or auction the UBS ARS at par at any time up until the expiration date of the offer and released UBS from any claims relating to the marketing and sale of the UBS ARS. Although the Company expects to sell its UBS ARS under the Right, if the Right is not exercised before July 2, 2012, it will expire and UBS will have no further rights or obligation to buy the Company’s UBS ARS. As the Company intends to exercise the Right during 2010, it has classified the UBS ARS in current assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. If the Company does not exercise the Right, the UBS ARS will continue to accrue interest as determined by the auction process or the terms outlined in the prospectus of the UBS ARS if the auction process fails. UBS’s obligations under the Right are not secured by its assets and do not require UBS to obtain any financing to support its performance obligations under the Right. UBS has disclaimed any assurance that it will have sufficient financial resources to satisfy its obligations under the Right.
 
The enforceability of the Right results in a put option that is recognized as a separate freestanding asset and is accounted for separately from the ARS investment. As of December 31, 2009, the fair value of the Right was


F-17


 

 
FORRESTER RESEARCH, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
approximately $2.1 million, which is classified as a marketable investment in current assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company made an election to measure the Right at fair value in order to match the changes in the fair value of the ARS. The Company valued the Right using a discounted cash flow approach including estimates of interest rates and timing and amount of cash flow, based on data available as of December 31, 2009 and adjusted for any bearer risk associated with UBS’s financial ability to repurchase the UBS ARS beginning June 30, 2010. These assumptions are volatile and subject to change as the underlying sources of these assumptions and market conditions change.
 
Prior to accepting the UBS offer, the Company classified its ARS asavailable-for-saleinvestments, and therefore recorded resulting unrealized gains or losses, net of tax, in accumulated other comprehensive loss on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. In connection with the acceptance of the UBS offer in November 2008, the Company reclassified its ARS subject to the Right fromavailable-for-saleto trading securities. The transfer to trading securities reflects the Company’s intent to exercise its put option during the period June 30, 2010 to July 3, 2012. Prior to its agreement with UBS, the Company’s intent was to hold the UBS ARS until the earlier of an anticipated recovery in market value or maturity. Upon transfer to trading securities, the Company recognized an unrealized loss of approximately $6.9 million, included in other income, net for the year ended December 31, 2008, for the amount of the unrealized loss not previously recognized in earnings. This amount offset a $6.9 million gain recognized for the initial value of the Right for the year ended December 31, 2008.
 
The Company holds additional ARS ($10.0 million fair value and $11.0 million par value at December 31, 2009) with another investment advisor who has not made an offer similar to UBS. These ARS will continue to be held asavailable-for-saleand are classified as a long-term asset in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company intends to retain its investment in the issuer of these ARS until the earlier of an anticipated recovery in market value or maturity and as a result has not recorded another-than-temporaryloss on these ARS.
 
There were no gross realized gains or losses on sales of the Company’s federal obligations, state and municipal bonds and corporate bonds for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 or 2009.
 
The following table represents the Company’s fair value hierarchy for its financial assets (cash equivalents and marketable investments) measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2008 and 2009 (in thousands):
 
                 
  As of December 31, 2008 
  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3  Total 
 
Money market funds(1)
 $14,529  $  $  $14,529 
Federal agency and corporate obligations(2)
     83,528      83,528 
State and municipal obligations
     71,156   39,613   110,769 
UBS Right
        6,887   6,887 
                 
Total
 $14,529  $154,684  $46,500  $215,713 
                 
 
                 
  As of December 31, 2009 
  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3  Total 
 
Money market funds(1)
 $50,472  $  $  $50,472 
Federal agency and corporate obligations
     74,490      74,490 
State and municipal obligations
     45,872   39,525   85,397 
UBS Right
        2,100   2,100 
                 
Total
 $50,472  $120,362  $41,625  $212,459 
                 
 
 
(1) included in cash and cash equivalents.
 
(2) $70.7 million included in cash and cash equivalents.


F-18


 

 
FORRESTER RESEARCH, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
 
Prior to 2008, the fair value of the ARS investments approximated par value due to the frequent resets through the auction process. While the Company continues to earn interest on its ARS investment at the contractual rate, these investments trade infrequently and therefore do not have a readily determinable market value. Accordingly, the estimated fair value of the ARS no longer approximates par value. At December 31, 2009, the Company held ARS with two investment advisors, both of which provided a valuation of Level 3 inputs for the ARS investments. One investment advisor utilized a discounted cash flow approach to arrive at this valuation, which was corroborated by a separate and comparable discounted cash flow analysis prepared by the Company. The assumptions used in preparing the discounted cash flow model include estimates, based on data available at December 31, 2009, of interest rates, timing and amount of cash flows, credit and liquidity premiums, and expected holding periods of the ARS. The discounted cash flow technique was used to value the ARS investments that were principally backed by student loans, which has had virtually no market activity since the auction failures began in 2008. The Company valued the Right as a put option asset using a discounted cash flow approach including estimates of interest rates, timing and amount of cash flow, adjusted for any bearer risk associated with UBS’s financial ability to repurchase the ARS beginning June 30, 2010, based on Level 3 data available at December 31, 2009. The combined fair value of the Right and the UBS ARS is equal to the par value of the UBS ARS. The other investment advisor provided a valuation at par value based on the limited market activity, which Forrester considered to be a Level 3 input, in addition to the underlying credit rating of the ARS, which was generally related to municipalities. In addition to the valuation provided by the investment advisor, Forrester completed a valuation of the securities using a discounted cash flow model that included estimates of interest rates, timing and amount of cash flows, credit and liquidity premiums and expected holding periods of the securities. Forrester relied most heavily on its own valuation, based primarily on the lack of market activity in these securities, which resulted in an unrealized loss recorded in other comprehensive loss in the Consolidated Balance Sheets of $1.1 million. The Company believes that the loss is temporary due to the underlying credit rating of the securities and the fact that the Company has the intent and ability to hold the securities until a full recovery has occurred. The assumptions used in valuing both the ARS and the Right are volatile and subject to change as the underlying sources of these assumptions and market conditions change.
 
The following table provides a summary of changes in fair value of the Company’s Level 3 financial assets as of December 31, 2008 and 2009 (in thousands):
 
         
  UBS
    
  Right  ARS 
 
Balance at December 31, 2007
 $  $ 
Transferred to Level 3
      120,200 
Sales/Maturities
     (73,700)
Issuance of Right
  6,887     
Total loss included in earnings
     (6,887)
         
Balance at December 31, 2008
  6,887   39,613 
Sales/Maturities
     (3,825)
Total gains (losses):
        
Included in other comprehensive loss
     (1,050)
Included in earnings
  (4,787)  4,787 
         
Balance at December 31, 2009
 $2,100  $39,525 
         
 
(5)  Non-Marketable Investments
 
At December 31, 2008 and 2009, the carrying value of the Company’s non-marketable investments, which were comprised primarily of interests in private equity funds, were $7.0 million and $5.5 million, respectively.
 
One of the Company’s investments, with a book value of $2.5 million and $1.9 million at December 31, 2008 and 2009, respectively, is being accounted for using the cost method and, accordingly, is valued at cost unless an


F-19


 

 
FORRESTER RESEARCH, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
other-than-temporaryimpairment in its value occurs or the investment is liquidated. The other investments are being accounted for using the equity method as the investments are limited partnerships and Forrester has an ownership interest in excess of 5% and, accordingly, Forrester records its share of the investee’s operating results each period. During the years ended December 2007, 2008 and 2009, the Company recorded losses of approximately $1.6 million, $0.6 million and $1.0 million, respectively, which are included in investment gains (losses) in the Consolidated Statements of Income. During the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009, gross distributions of $1.9 million, $0.6 million and $0.1 million, respectively, were received from the funds.
 
(6)  Income Taxes
 
Income from continuing operations before income tax provision for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009 consists of the following (in thousands):
 
             
  2007  2008  2009 
 
Domestic
 $25,886  $40,076  $33,094 
Foreign
  4,118   4,734   641 
             
Total
 $30,004  $44,810  $33,735 
             
 
The components of the income tax provision for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009 are as follows (in thousands):
 
             
  2007  2008  2009 
 
Current:
            
Federal
 $334  $9,238  $8,853 
State
  2,238   3,325   3,488 
Foreign
  1,611   1,515   585 
             
   4,183   14,078   12,926 
Deferred:
            
Federal
  7,513   2,059   1,774 
State
  151   (43)  (346)
Foreign
  (786)  (499)  515 
             
   6,878   1,517   1,943 
             
Income tax provision
 $11,061  $15,595  $14,869 
             
 
A reconciliation of the federal statutory rate to Forrester’s effective tax rate for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009 is as follows:
 
             
  2007  2008  2009 
 
Income tax provision at federal statutory rate
  35.0%  35.0%  35.0%
Increase (decrease) in tax resulting from:
            
State tax provision, net of federal benefit
  6.2   4.7   6.1 
Non-deductible expenses
  1.5   0.4   0.7 
Tax-exempt interest income
  (8.1)  (3.8)  (3.0)
Stock option compensation deduction
  2.7   (0.3)  1.1 
Other, net
  4.1   1.6   3.0 
Change in tax rate
  (5.8)      
Exchange rate (gain) loss
  (1.9)  (1.7)  1.8 
Change in valuation allowance
  3.2   (1.1)  (0.6)
             
Effective tax rate
  36.9%  34.8%  44.1%
             


F-20


 

 
FORRESTER RESEARCH, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
The components of deferred income taxes as of December 31, 2008 and 2009 are as follows (in thousands):
 
         
  2008  2009 
 
Non-deductible reserves and accruals
 $3,645  $4,469 
Stock compensation
  3,996   5,542 
Depreciation and amortization
  820   1,727 
Net operating loss and other carryforwards
  22,072   19,445 
         
Gross deferred tax asset
  30,533   31,183 
Less — valuation allowance
  (10,922)  (11,672)
         
Sub-total
  19,611   19,511 
Goodwill amortization
  (5,291)  (6,930)
Deferred commissions
  (3,831)  (3,912)
         
Net deferred tax asset
 $10,489  $8,669 
         
 
The Company considers all available evidence, both positive and negative, to determine whether, based on the weight of that evidence, a valuation allowance is needed for some portion or all of a net deferred income tax asset. Judgment is used in considering the relative impact of negative and positive evidence. In arriving at these judgments, the weight given to the potential effect of negative and positive evidence is commensurate with the extent to which it can be objectively verified. Although realization is not assured, based upon projections of Forrester’s future taxable income over the periods during which the deferred tax assets are deductible and the carryforwards expire, management believes it is more likely than not that Forrester will realize the benefits of these deductible differences, net of the existing valuation allowances.
 
As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company maintained a valuation allowance of approximately $11.7 million and $10.9 million, respectively, which primarily relates to foreign NOL carryforwards from a prior acquisition, foreign tax credit carryforwards and domestic capital losses.
 
As of December 31, 2009, the Company had federal NOL carryforwards of approximately $21.5 million. If unused, the NOL carryforwards would expire on various dates from 2013 through 2028. The use of these NOL carryforwards may be limited pursuant to Internal Revenue Code Section 382 as a result of future ownership changes.
 
As of December 31, 2009 the Company had federal and state capital loss carryforwards of $1.0 million that expire in 2013 and had foreign tax credit carryforwards of $0.8 million that expire between 2012 and 2018.
 
The Company also has foreign net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $35.1 million, which can be carried forward indefinitely. Approximately $6.7 million of the foreign net operating loss carryforwards relate to a prior acquisition, the utilization of which is subject to limitation under the tax law of the United Kingdom.
 
Upon the adoption of a newly issued accounting standard as of January 1, 2009 with respect to accounting for acquisitions, changes in deferred tax asset valuation allowances and income tax uncertainties after the acquisition date generally will affect income tax expense, including charges and uncertainties associated with acquisitions that closed prior to January 1, 2009.
 
During the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2008, the Company recognized approximately $0.1 million and $8.5 million, respectively, of tax benefits from excess tax deductions resulting from employee stock option exercises. The tax benefit was recorded as an increase to additionalpaid-in-capital.Excess tax benefits from share-based payments are recognized in the year that the deduction reduces the amount of cash payable for taxes. No such tax benefits were recognized in the year ended December 31, 2009.
 
As of December 31, 2009, the Company has not provided for U.S. deferred income taxes on undistributed earnings of approximately $11.3 million for its foreign subsidiaries, since these earnings are to be indefinitely reinvested. Determination of the amount of U.S. income tax liability that would be incurred is not practicable.


F-21


 

 
FORRESTER RESEARCH, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
Effective January 1, 2007, the Company adopted a new accounting standard concerning the accounting for income tax contingencies. This standard clarified the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements and prescribed a two step process for the measurement of uncertain tax positions that have been taken or are expected to be taken in a tax return. The first step is a determination of whether the tax position should be recognized in the financial statements. The second step determines the measurement of the tax position. The standard also provides guidance on derecognition of such tax positions, classification, potential interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods and disclosure. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.
 
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of our unrecognized tax benefits is summarized as follows:
 
             
  2007  2008  2009 
 
Unrecognized tax benefits at January 1
 $1,110  $1,409  $1,222 
Gross increases for tax positions of prior years
  320   398    
Gross decreases for tax positions of prior years
     (12)  (19)
Settlements
     (320)   
Lapse of applicable statute of limitations
  (21)  (253)  (284)
             
Unrecognized tax benefits at December 31
 $1,409  $1,222  $919 
             
 
The Company and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the United States and various state and international jurisdictions. Major taxing jurisdictions include the U.S., the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. The Company is no longer subject to U.S. state or local andnon-U.S. incometax examinations by tax authorities in its major jurisdictions for years before 2002, except to the extent of net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards from those years.
 
The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense and such amounts were not material in the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009. As of December 31, 2008 and 2009, the Company had approximately $0.2 million and $0.2 million, respectively, of accrued interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions.
 
Total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that would affect the effective tax rate if recognized is $0.9 million as of December 31, 2008 and $0.5 million as of December 31, 2009. It is reasonably possible that the gross unrecognized benefits will be decreased by a range of zero to $0.4 million within the next twelve months due primarily to the expiration of the relevant statutes of limitations.
 
(7)  Commitments
 
As of December 31, 2009, Forrester had future contractual obligations as follows for operating leases (in thousands):
 
     
2010
 $9,487 
2011
  7,010 
2012
  6,785 
2013
  6,391 
2014
  6,286 
Thereafter
  71,639 
     
Total minimum lease payments
 $107,598 
     
 
On September 29, 2009, the Company entered into abuild-to-suitnet lease (“Lease”) pursuant to which the landlord will build a new corporate headquarters building for the Company in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Pursuant to the Lease, as amended, the landlord will construct an approximately 190,000 square foot building (“Building”) and lease the Building and parcel to the Company to be used as its new corporate headquarters. During construction, the Company will continue to occupy its current corporate headquarters in Cambridge, Massachusetts under the existing lease for such premises. In accordance with the Lease, the Company placed $14.8 million in escrow for


F-22


 

 
FORRESTER RESEARCH, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
leasehold improvements for the Building, which is classified as restricted cash on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The $14.8 million in escrow will be increased or decreased based upon the final estimate of construction costs and will be released from escrow as the leasehold improvements are constructed.
 
Aggregate rent expenses, net of sublease income, were approximately $9.4 million, $9.4 million and $10.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008, and 2009, respectively.
 
(8)  Stockholders’ Equity
 
Preferred Stock
 
Forrester has authorized 500,000 shares of $.01 par value preferred stock. The Board of Directors has full authority to issue this stock and to fix the voting powers, preferences, rights, qualifications, limitations, or restrictions thereof, including dividend rights, conversion rights, redemption privileges and liquidation preferences and the number of shares constituting any series or designation of such series.
 
Treasury Stock
 
Forrester’s Board of Directors has authorized an aggregate $200 million to purchase common stock under the stock repurchase program. The shares repurchased may be used, among other things, in connection with Forrester’s equity incentive and purchase plans. As of December 31, 2009, Forrester had repurchased approximately 7.0 million shares of common stock at an aggregate cost of $141.3 million, including commissions paid for the acquisition of the common stock.
 
Equity Plans
 
Forrester maintains the following four equity compensation plans: the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2006 Plan”), the Amended and Restated 1996 Equity Incentive Plan (the “1996 Plan”), the 2006 Stock Option Plan for Directors’ (the “2006 Directors’ Plan”) and the 1996 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors (the “1996 Directors’ Plan”). Upon approval of the 2006 Plan and the 2006 Directors Plan by stockholders, no future awards under the 1996 Plan and 1996 Directors Plan could be granted or issued.
 
In May 2006, the 2006 Plan was approved by the stockholders of the Company. The 2006 Plan provides for the issuance of stock-based awards, including incentive stock options (“ISOs”), non-qualified stock options (“NSOs”), and restricted stock units (“RSUs”) to purchase up to 4,350,000 shares authorized in the 2006 Plan plus up to 2,500,000 shares returned from the 1996 Plan. Under the terms of the 2006 Plan, ISOs may not be granted at less than fair market value on the date of grant (and in no event less than par value). Options generally vest annually over two to four years and expire after 10 years and RSUs generally vest over three years, in each case sometimes subject to performance conditions in addition to the passage of time. Options and RSUs granted under the 2006 Plan immediately vest upon certain events, as described in the 2006 Plan. As of December 31, 2009, approximately 3.3 million shares were available for future grant of awards under the 2006 Plan.
 
The 1996 Plan provided for the issuance of stock-based awards, including ISOs and NSOs, to purchase up to 13,500,000 shares of common stock. Under the terms of the 1996 Plan, ISOs were not granted at less than fair market value on the date of grant (and in no event less than par value). ISO grants to holders of 10% of the combined voting power of all classes of Forrester stock were required to be granted at an exercise price not less than 110% of the fair market value at the date of grant. Options generally vest ratably over two to four years and expire after 10 years and are sometimes subject to performance conditions in addition to the passage of time. Options granted under the 1996 Plan immediately vest upon certain events, as described in the 1996 Plan.
 
In May 2006, the 2006 Directors’ Plan was approved by the stockholders of the Company. The 2006 Directors’ Plan provides for the issuance of options to purchase up to 450,000 shares of common stock. Under the 2006 Directors’ Plan, each non-employee director shall be awarded an option to purchase 6,000 shares of common stock, at an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the common stock upon his or her election as a director. These options vest in four equal annual installments, with the first installment vested on the date of grant. In


F-23


 

 
FORRESTER RESEARCH, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
addition, each non-employee director will also receive an option to purchase 12,500 shares of common stock, at an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the common stock on the grant date, each year immediately following Forrester’s annual stockholders’ meeting. These options vest in four equal installments on the first, second, third, and fourth anniversaries of the date of grant. Options granted under the 2006 Directors’ Plan immediately vest upon certain events, as described in the 2006 Directors’ Plan. As of December 31, 2009, approximately 0.2 million shares were available for future grant of awards under the 2006 Directors Plan.
 
The 1996 Directors’ Plan provided that each non-employee director shall be awarded an option to purchase 6,000 shares of common stock, at an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the common stock upon his or her election as a director. These options vest in four equal annual installments, with the first installment vested on the date of grant. In addition, the 1996 Directors’ Plan provided that each non-employee director will also receive an option to purchase 12,500 shares of common stock, at an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the common stock at time of grant, each year immediately following Forrester’s annual stockholders’ meeting. These options vest in four equal installments on the first, second, third, and fourth anniversaries of the date of grant. Options granted under the 1996 Directors’ Plan immediately vest upon certain events, as described in the 1996 Directors’ Plan.
 
Stock Options
 
Stock option activity for the year ended December 31, 2009 is presented below (in thousands, except per share data):
 
                 
     Weighted-
  Weighted -
    
     Average
  Average
    
     Exercise
  Remaining
  Aggregate
 
  Number
  Price Per
  Contractual
  Intrinsic
 
  of Shares  Share  Term (In Years)  Value 
 
Outstanding at December 31, 2008
  2,934  $25.16         
Granted
  460   24.80         
Exercised
  (134)  19.08         
Forfeited
  (170)  28.60         
                 
Outstanding at December 31, 2009
  3,090  $25.18   6.30  $8,734 
                 
Exercisable at December 31, 2009
  2,096  $24.67   5.26  $7,988 
                 
Vested and expected to vest at December 31, 2009
  2,975  $25.16   6.30  $8,625 
                 
 
The total intrinsic value of options exercised during 2007, 2008 and 2009 was $2.5 million, $10.4 million and $0.7 million, respectively.
 
On April 3, 2006, Forrester issued to its employees options to purchase 587,500 shares of common stock. These options were subject to performance criteria and would vest only if certain pro forma operating margin targets related to full year 2006 performance were achieved. The vesting of these options was over 24 or 36 months, or the options could be forfeited, depending on the actual pro forma operating margin achieved for 2006. During 2006, operating performance was expected to result in the options vesting over 36 months and expense was recognized assuming that vesting period. The actual pro forma operating margin for 2006 resulted in accelerated vesting of the options over 24 months and the compensation expense associated with the accelerated vesting was recognized on a prospective basis through the remainder of the vesting period. The expense related to these options was recognized on a graded basis.
 
On April 2, 2007, Forrester issued to its employees options to purchase 293,600 shares of common stock. These options were subject to performance criteria and would vest only if certain pro forma operating margin targets related to full year 2007 performance were achieved. The vesting of these options was over 24 or 36 months,


F-24


 

 
FORRESTER RESEARCH, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
or the options could be forfeited, depending on the actual pro forma operating margin achieved for 2007. During 2007, operating performance was expected to result in the options vesting over 36 months and expense was recognized assuming that vesting period. The actual pro forma operating margin for 2007 resulted in the options vesting over 36 months and the expense related to these options is being recognized on a graded basis.
 
On April 1, 2008, Forrester issued to its employees options to purchase 370,000 shares of common stock. These options were subject to performance criteria and would vest only if certain pro forma operating profit targets related to full year 2008 performance were achieved. The vesting of these options was over 24, 36 or 48 months, or the options could be forfeited, depending on the actual pro forma operating profit achieved for 2008. During 2008, operating performance was expected to result in the options vesting over 48 months and expense was recognized assuming that vesting period. The actual pro forma operating profit targets for 2008 resulted in accelerated vesting of the options over 24 months and the compensation expense associated with the accelerated vesting will be recognized on a prospective basis through the remainder of the vesting period. The expense related to these options is being recognized on a graded basis.
 
Terminated employees have three months from date of termination to exercise their vested options. During 2007, following the Company’s conclusion that its historical financial statements could no longer be relied upon, the registration statement covering the offer and sale of stock upon the exercise of stock options was not available. As a result, no option holders were able to exercise their options and terminated employees faced the prospect of having their options expire before being able to exercise them. Because the suspension of the registration statement was not anticipated, the Company modified vested options held by terminated employees to extend their expiration dates to 30 days after the date the suspension was lifted, but no later than December 31, 2007 (tolled stock options). Options for terminated employees that were tolled before March 14, 2007 were accounted for as liability awards because the option holders were no longer employees at the time of the modification and because of the Company’s inability to provide shares upon exercise. When the Company’s registration statement covering the offer and sale of stock became available, these awards were reclassified as equity awards. Options that were tolled after March 14, 2007 were accounted for as equity awards because the options were tolled in conjunction with the employee’s termination. A summary of the options tolled during 2007 is as follows:
 
             
        Total
 
  Number of
  Number of
  Expense
 
  Individuals  Shares  (in 000’s) 
 
Amount related to the modification of previously issued stock options
  16   76,800  $533 
Tolled stock options accounted for as liability awards and related fair market value adjustments
  8   66,588   478 
             
   24   143,388  $1,011 
             
 
During 2007, the Board of Directors approved a tender offer to amend or replace certain previously granted stock options that had exercise prices less than the market value of the Company’s common stock on the correct measurement date and therefore would have been subject to tax under Internal Revenue Code Section 409A. In the tender offer, the Company adjusted the exercise prices of the affected options to the same prices used to calculate compensation expense in the consolidated financial statements. The Company agreed to compensate the employees who elected to participate in the tender offer by paying to each such person in January 2008 an amount equal to 105% of the difference between the original exercise price and the corrected exercise price for each affected option. In total, 117 employees had options to purchase approximately 213,000 shares modified in December 2007 in connection with the tender offer. The total incremental cost of the modification was approximately $0.4 million.
 
Restricted Stock Units
 
In 2009, Forrester issued to its employees 95,496 performance-based restricted stock units (“RSUs”). Each RSU represents the right to receive one share of Forrester common stock when the restrictions lapse and the vesting


F-25


 

 
FORRESTER RESEARCH, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
conditions are met. The vesting of the RSUs is subject to performance criteria and will vest at 100% or 40% on April 1, 2012, or the RSUs could be forfeited, depending on whether specified revenue growth and pro forma operating targets related to full year 2011 performance are achieved. Compensation expense in 2009 was recognized based on the assumption of 100% vesting of the RSUs.
 
RSU activity for the year ended December 31, 2009 is presented below (in thousands, except per share data):
 
         
     Weighted-
 
     Average
 
     Grant Date
 
  RSUs  Fair Value 
 
Unvested at December 31, 2008
    $ 
Granted
  95,496   25.21 
Vested or settled
      
Forfeited
  (1,294)  25.25 
         
Unvested at December 31, 2009
  94,202  $25.21 
         
 
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
 
In September 1996, Forrester adopted the 1996 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Stock Purchase Plan”). The Stock Purchase Plan, as amended and restated in 2009, provides for the issuance of up to 1.5 million shares of common stock and as of December 31, 2009 approximately 0.6 million shares remain available for issuance. With certain limited exceptions, all employees of Forrester who have completed six months or more of continuous service in the employ of Forrester and whose customary employment is more than 20 hours per week, including officers and directors who are employees, are eligible to participate in the Stock Purchase Plan. Purchase periods under the Stock Purchase Plan are generally six months in length and commence on each successive January 1 and July 1. During each purchase period under the Stock Purchase Plan, the maximum number of shares of common stock that may be purchased by an employee is limited to the number of shares equal to $12,500 divided by the fair market value of a share of common stock on the first day of the purchase period. An employee may elect to have up to 10% deducted from his or her compensation for the purpose of purchasing shares under the Stock Purchase Plan. The price at which the employee’s shares are purchased is the lower of: a) 85% of the closing price of the common stock on the day that the purchase period commences, or b) 85% of the closing price of the common stock on the day that the purchase period terminates. The Company did not have purchase periods during 2007. Shares purchased by employees under the Stock Purchase Plan are as follows:
 
         
  Shares
 Purchase
Purchase Period Ended
 Purchased Price
 
June 30, 2008
  32,356  $23.38 
December 31, 2008
  35,598  $23.98 
June 30, 2009
  43,174  $20.87 
December 31, 2009
  38,212  $21.46 
 
(9)  Employee Pension Plans
 
Forrester sponsors several defined contribution plans for eligible employees. Generally, the defined contribution plans have funding provisions which, in certain situations, require contributions based upon formulas relating to employee wages or the level of elective participant contributions, as well as allow for additional discretionary contributions. Further, certain plans contain vesting provisions. Forrester’s contributions to these plans totaled approximately $2.0 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008, and 2009.


F-26


 

 
FORRESTER RESEARCH, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
 
(10)  Reorganization
 
During the first quarter of 2009, Forrester announced a reduction of its workforce by approximately 50 positions in response to conditions and demands of the market and a slower economy. Additionally, Forrester identified certain leased office space that was no longer required to support the ongoing business. As a result, Forrester recorded a reorganization charge of approximately $3.1 million in the three months ended March 31, 2009. Approximately 44% of the terminated employees were members of the sales force, while 38% and 18% held research and administrative roles, respectively. In addition, during the fourth quarter of 2009, Forrester incurred additional reorganization costs of $2.3 million related to facility consolidations primarily in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Of the $2.3 million fourth quarter charge, approximately $1.4 million relates to future lease payments through September 2011 and $0.9 million relates to the write-off of leasehold improvements.
 
The activity related to the reorganization during the year ended December 31, 2009 is as follows (in thousands):
 
             
  Workforce
  Facility
    
  Reduction  Consolidation  Total 
 
Total charge
 $2,872  $2,569  $5,441 
Cash payments
  (2,774)  (84)  (2,858)
Non-cash portion of charge
     (898)  (898)
             
Accrual at December 31, 2009
 $98  $1,587  $1,685 
             
 
The costs accrued at December 31, 2009 are expected to be paid in the amount of $1.3 million in 2010 and $0.4 million in 2011.
 
(11)  Operating Segment and Enterprise Wide Reporting
 
Forrester is organized into three client groups with each client group responsible for writing relevant research for the roles within the client organizations on a worldwide basis. The three client groups are: Information Technology (“IT”), Technology Industry (“TI”), and Marketing and Strategy (“M&S”). All of the client groups generate revenues through sales of research and advisory and other service offerings targeted at specific roles within their targeted clients. Each of the client groups consists of sales personnel responsible for selling to clients within the client group’s target client base and research personnel focused primarily on issues relevant to particular roles and to theday-to-dayresponsibilities of persons within the roles. Amounts included in the “Events” segment relate to the operations of the events sales and production departments. Revenue reported in the Events segment consists primarily of sponsorships and event tickets to Forrester events.
 
Forrester evaluates reportable segment performance and allocates resources based on direct margin. Direct margin, as presented below, is defined as operating income excluding certain selling and marketing expenses, client services, stock-based compensation expense, general and administrative expenses, depreciation expense, amortization of intangible assets and reorganization costs. The accounting policies used by the reportable segments are the same as those used in the consolidated financial statements.
 
Forrester does not identify or allocate assets, including capital expenditures, by operating segment. Accordingly, assets are not being reported by segment because the information is not available by segment and is not reviewed in the evaluation of performance or making decisions in the allocation of resources.


F-27


 

 
FORRESTER RESEARCH, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
The following tables present information about reportable segments (in thousands).
 
                     
  IT  TI  M&S  Events  Consolidated 
 
Year ended December 31, 2007
                    
Revenue
 $89,818  $64,936  $46,351  $10,951  $212,056 
Direct margin
  39,238   34,279   16,090   4,074   93,681 
Corporate expenses
                  (69,798)
Amortization of intangible assets
                  (1,232)
                     
Income from operations
                 $22,651 
                     
Year ended December 31, 2008
                    
Revenue
 $99,869  $69,621  $58,773  $12,612  $240,875 
Direct margin
  44,904   35,877   20,244   5,397   106,422 
Corporate expenses
                  (67,023)
Amortization of intangible assets
                  (1,435)
                     
Income from operations
                 $37,964 
                     
Year ended December 31, 2009
                    
Revenue
 $92,950  $66,848  $63,910  $9,644  $233,352 
Direct margin
  43,497   34,408   22,970   3,183   104,058 
Corporate expenses
                  (63,807)
Amortization of intangible assets
                  (2,290)
Reorganization costs
                  (5,541)
                     
Income from operations
                 $32,420 
                     
 
Net long-lived tangible assets by location as of December 31, 2008 and 2009 are as follows (in thousands):
 
         
  2008  2009 
 
United States
 $5,447  $4,793 
Europe (excluding United Kingdom)
  934   765 
United Kingdom
  370   258 
Other
  8   7 
         
  $6,759  $5,823 
         
 
Net revenues by geographic destination and as a percentage of total revenues for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008, and 2009 are as follows (in thousands):
 
             
  2007  2008  2009 
 
United States
 $149,745  $172,973  $164,031 
Europe (excluding United Kingdom)
  25,328   31,179   31,011 
United Kingdom
  16,348   14,294   15,200 
Canada
  11,731   13,267   13,706 
Other
  8,904   9,162   9,404 
             
  $212,056  $240,875  $233,352 
             
 


F-28


 

 
FORRESTER RESEARCH, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
             
  2007  2008  2009 
 
United States
  71%  72%  70%
Europe (excluding United Kingdom)
  12%  13%  13%
United Kingdom
  8%  6%  7%
Canada
  6%  6%  6%
Other
  3%  3%  4%
             
   100%  100%  100%
             
 
(12)  Certain Balance Sheet Accounts
 
Property and Equipment:
 
Property and equipment as of December 31, 2008 and 2009 consist of the following (in thousands):
 
         
  2008  2009 
 
Computers and equipment
 $10,787  $10,758 
Computer software
  10,155   10,828 
Furniture and fixtures
  3,909   4,653 
Leasehold improvements
  5,975   6,043 
         
Total property and equipment
  30,826   32,282 
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
  24,067   26,459 
         
  $6,759  $5,823 
         
 
Accrued Expenses:
 
Accrued expenses as of December 31, 2008 and 2009 consist of the following (in thousands):
 
         
  2008  2009 
 
Payroll and related
 $9,873  $16,153 
Taxes
  7,805   2,896 
Other
  9,849   11,119 
         
  $27,527  $30,168 
         
 
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts:
 
A roll-forward of the allowance for doubtful accounts as of and for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008, and 2009 is as follows (in thousands):
 
             
  2007  2008  2009 
 
Balance, beginning of year
 $717  $727  $485 
Provision for doubtful accounts
  480   594   490 
Additions from acquisition
     107    
Write-offs
  (470)  (943)  (569)
             
Balance, end of year
 $727  $485  $406 
             

F-29


 

 
FORRESTER RESEARCH, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
 
(13)  Summary Selected Quarterly Financial Data (unaudited)
 
The following is a summary of selected quarterly financial data for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2009 (in thousands, except per share data):
 
                                 
  Unaudited Consolidated Statement of Income Data for the
  Three Months Ended
  March 31,
 June 30,
 September 30,
 December 31,
 March 31,
 June 30,
 September 30,
 December 31,
  2008 2008 2008 2008 2009 2009 2009 2009
 
Total revenues
 $54,974  $63,474  $59,506  $62,921  $56,407  $61,578  $53,881  $61,486 
Income from operations
 $6,543  $10,430  $8,595  $12,396  $3,185  $12,218  $7,950  $9,067 
Net income
 $5,028  $8,645  $6,388  $9,154  $2,631  $6,152  $4,300  $5,783 
Basic income per common share
 $0.22  $0.38  $0.28  $0.40  $0.11  $0.27  $0.19  $0.26 
Diluted income per common share
 $0.21  $0.37  $0.27  $0.39  $0.11  $0.27  $0.19  $0.26 
 
The Company recorded $1.4 million of net foreign exchange losses related to the remeasurement of intercompany transactions in the fourth quarter of 2008, of which, $1.9 million related to prior years.


F-30


 

Item 9.  Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
 
Not Applicable.
 
Item 9A.  Controls and Procedures
 
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
 
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inRule 13a-15(e)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on the evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2009.
 
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
 
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined inRule 13a-15(f)and15d-15(f)under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). Internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that: 1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; 2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and 3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
 
Because of its inherent limitations, a system of internal control over financial reporting can provide only reasonable assurance and may not prevent or detect material misstatements. Further, because of changes in conditions, effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting may vary over time.
 
Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009. In making its assessment, management used the criteria set forth in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (“COSO”) of the Treadway Commission. Based on this assessment, management believes that as of December 31, 2009, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria.
 
The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009 has been audited by BDO Seidman, LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report, which appears on page 29 of this Annual Report onForm 10-K.
 
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
 
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting in the quarter ending December 31, 2009 that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.


28


 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM ON
INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
 
Board of Directors and Shareholders
Forrester Research, Inc.
Cambridge, MA
 
We have audited Forrester Research, Inc. (the “Company”) and subsidiaries internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Item 9A, Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
 
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
 
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
 
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
 
In our opinion, Forrester Research, Inc. and subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on the COSO criteria.
 
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Forrester Research, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009 and our report dated March 12, 2010 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
 
/s/  BDO Seidman, LLP
 
Boston, Massachusetts
March 12, 2010


29


 

PART III
 
Item 10.  Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
 
Executive Officers
 
The following table sets forth information about our executive officers as of March 1, 2010.
 
       
Name
 
Age
 
Position
 
George F. Colony
  56  Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer
Michael A. Doyle
  54  Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Dwight Griesman
  52  Chief Marketing Officer
Elizabeth Lemons
  53  Chief People Officer
Gail S. Mann, Esq. 
  58  Chief Legal Officer and Secretary
Julie Meringer
  41  Managing Director, Information Technology Client Group
Mark R. Nemec
  40  Managing Director, Technology Industry Client Group
Gregory Nelson
  37  Chief Sales Officer
George Orlov
  52  Chief Information Officer and Chief Technology Officer
Charles Rutstein
  37  Chief Operating Officer
Dennis van Lingen
  45  Managing Director, Marketing & Strategy Client Group; Chief EMEA (Europe, Middle East, and Africa) Officer
 
George F. Colony, Forrester’s founder, has served as Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer since the Company’s inception in July 1983, and as President since September 2001 and from1983-2000.
 
Michael A. Doyle began serving as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer in September 2007. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Doyle was Chief Financial Officer of Easylink Services Corporation, a publicly traded telecommunications messaging provider, since 2004. Prior to joining Easylink, Mr. Doyle was the Chief Financial Officer for North America of Dun & Bradstreet Corporation from 2002 to 2004, and from 1997 to 2002, he held various senior financial and marketing positions with Cendant Corporation.
 
Dwight Griesman became Forrester’s Chief Marketing Officer in August 2008. Mr. Griesman joined the Company in 2005 as Vice President and Practice Leader, Forrester Leadership Boards. Previously, he was Managing Director at the Forbes Consulting Group Quantitative Analytics Division from 2001-2004.
 
Elizabeth Lemons became Forrester’s Chief People Officer in March 2007. Ms. Lemons joined the Company in June 2006 as Vice President, Strategic Growth for the Americas. Previously, she was Director of Human Resources at the Joslin Diabetes Center from 2005 to June 2006 and Vice President and Partner at Executive Destinations Inc., an executive career management firm, from1997-2005.
 
Gail S. Mann, Esq. became Forrester’s Chief Legal Officer and Secretary in February 2004. Ms. Mann previously was of counsel to the law firm of Morse, Barnes-Brown & Pendleton, P.C. from 2002 until joining Forrester. Prior to 2002 Ms. Mann was Vice President and Associate General Counsel of Harcourt General, Inc., a global multimedia publishing company, and its affiliate, The Neiman Marcus Group, a high end specialty retailer, from1999-2001,and Vice President and Assistant General Counsel of Digital Equipment Corporation from 1994 to 1998.
 
Julie Meringer became Managing Director of Forrester’s Information Technology Client Group in January 2007. Ms. Meringer joined Forrester in 1991. From 2005 until 2007, Ms. Meringer served as Vice President of Forrester’s consulting group and previously was a Vice President for our CIO Group, one of the Forrester Leadership Boards, from 2002 to 2004. Prior to 2002, Ms. Meringer held various leadership roles in our London office and research organization.
 
Gregory Nelson became Chief Sales Officer in August 2009. Previously, he served as Vice President of Sales for our Information Technology Client Group — EMEA region from September 2007 to August 2009. From January 2004 to September 2007 Mr. Nelson served as a regional sales director for the Company, and


30


 

prior to that, he held sales positions with the Company and with Giga Information Group, Inc., which we acquired in 2003.
 
Mark R. Nemec, Ph.D. became Managing Director of Forrester’s Technology Industry Client Group in January 2007. Previously, Mr. Nemec was Vice President, Forrester Leadership Boards in 2006, and prior to that, Vice President, Council Manager. Prior to joining Forrester in 2005, Mr. Nemec was a senior director at the Advisory Board Company, a research consultancy based in Washington, D.C from 2000 to 2005. Previously, Mr. Nemec was on the faculty of Davidson College from 1999 to 2000.
 
George M. Orlov became Forrester’s Chief Information Officer and Chief Technology Officer in December 2004. Prior to joining Forrester, Mr. Orlov was Chief Information Officer and Chief Technology Officer for Callisma, Inc., a professional services firm focused on technology infrastructure that was acquired by SBC Communications in 2003. Prior to 2003, Mr. Orlov served as Vice President and Chief Information Officer at Pacific Gas & Electric from 1998 to 2000, and prior thereto, he held the same position with Commonwealth Edison Company from 1996 to 1998.
 
Charles Rutstein became Forrester’s Chief Operating Officer effective January 1, 2007. Mr. Rutstein joined Forrester in 1999. In 2006, Mr. Rutstein served as President, Forrester Americas. In 2005, he served as our Vice President, Community and previously was our Vice President of Consulting from 2003 to 2005. Prior to 2003, Mr. Rutstein held various leadership positions in our research organization. Before joining Forrester, Mr. Rutstein served as a principal consultant with Price Waterhouse Management Consulting Services.
 
Dennis van Lingen became Managing Director of our Marketing and Strategy Client Group in January 2007. Mr. Van Lingen also serves as Forrester’s Chief Europe, Middle East, and Africa (EMEA) Officer. He was formerly President of EMEA from May 2006 to December 2006 and Vice President of Marketing for the Americas from January 2004 to May 2006. Mr. Van Lingen joined Forrester in 2000 as Director of Marketing for Europe. Before joining Forrester, Mr. Van Lingen worked as a senior manager in the marketing and public relations divisions of Nissan Europe for 10 years.
 
Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics covers all employees, officers and directors, including our principal executive, financial and accounting officers. A copy of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics can be found on our web site,www.forrester.com.
 
We intend to satisfy the disclosure requirements under Item 5.05 ofForm 8-Kregarding an amendment to, or waiver from, a provision of the Company’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, and that relates to a substantive amendment or material departure from a provision of the Code, by posting such information on our Internet website at www.forrester.com. We also intend to satisfy the disclosure requirements of the Nasdaq Stock Market regarding waivers of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics by posting such information on our Internet website atwww.forrester.com.
 
The remainder of the response to this item is contained in our Proxy Statement for our 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “2010 Proxy Statement”) under the captions “Election of Directors” and “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance”, all of which is incorporated herein by reference.
 
Item 11.  Executive Compensation
 
The response to this item is contained in the 2010 Proxy Statement under the captions “Directors’ Compensation” and “Executive Compensation” and is incorporated herein by reference.
 
Item 12.  Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
 
The response to this item is contained in the 2010 Proxy Statement under the caption “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” and is incorporated herein by reference.


31


 

The following table summarizes, as of December 31, 2009, the number of options issued under our equity compensation plans and the number of shares available for future issuance under these plans:
 
             
  (a)
     (c)
 
  Number of Securities
  (b)
  Number of Securities Remaining
 
  to be Issued Upon Exercise
  Weighted Average Exercise
  Available for Future Issuance Under
 
  of Outstanding Options,
  Price of Outstanding options,
  Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding
 
Plan Category
 Warrants and Rights  Warrants and Rights  Securities Reflected in Column (a)(1) 
 
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders(1)
  3,183,756  $25.18   4,056,054 
Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders
  N/A   N/A   N/A 
             
Total
  3,183,756  $25.18   4,056,054 
 
 
(1) Column (c) includes, as of December 31, 2009, 3,273,116 shares available for issuance under our 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, 200,000 shares under our 2006 Director’s Stock Option Plan, and 582,938 shares that are available for issuance under our Amended and Restated Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
 
The shares available under out 2006 Equity Incentive Plan are available to be awarded as restricted or unrestricted stock or stock units.
 
Item 13.  Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
 
The response to this item is contained in the Company’s 2010 Proxy Statement under the captions “Information with respect to Board of Directors”, “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions”, and “Related Person Transactions” and is incorporated herein by reference.
 
Item 14.  Principal Accounting Fees and Services
 
The response to this item is contained in the Company’s 2010 Proxy Statement under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” and is incorporated herein by reference.
 
PART IV
 
Item 15.  Exhibits, Financial Statements Schedules.
 
a. Financial Statements.  See Index on page 27.
 
b. Financial Statement Schedules.  None.
 
c. Exhibits.  A complete listing of exhibits required is given in the Exhibit Index that precedes the exhibits filed with this report on page 33 hereof.


32


 

EXHIBIT INDEX
 
   
Exhibit No.
 
Description
 
2.1(1)
 Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of January 20, 2003 between Forrester Research, Inc., Whitcomb Acquisition Corp. and Giga Information Group, Inc.
3.1(2)
 Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Forrester Research, Inc.
3.2(3)
 Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation of Forrester Research, Inc.
3.3(4)
 Bylaws of Forrester Research, Inc., as amended
4(3)
 Specimen Certificate for shares of Common Stock, $.01 par value, of Forrester Research, Inc.
10.1+(3)
 Registration Rights and Non-Competition Agreement
10.2+(5)
 1996 Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan, as amended
10.3+(16)
 Amended and Restated Employee Stock Purchase Plan
10.4+(6)
 1996 Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors
10.5+(7)
 2006 Equity Incentive Plan
10.6+(7)
 2006 Stock Option Plan for Directors
10.7+(8)
 Form of Stock Option Certificate (1996 Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan)
10.8+(9)
 Form of Performance-Based Option Certificate (1996 Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan)
10.9+(10)
 Form of Director’s Option Certificate (1996 Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors)
10.10+(11)
 Form of Incentive Stock Option Certificate (2006 Equity Incentive Plan)
10.11+(11)
 Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Certificate (2006 Equity Incentive Plan)
10.12+(12)
 Form of Performance-Based Option Certificate (2006 Equity Incentive Plan)
10.13+(17)
 Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (2006 Equity Incentive Plan)
10.14+(12)
 Form of Director’s Option Certificate (2006 Stock Option Plan for Directors)
10.15+(13)
 Description of Matrix Bonus Plan
10.16+(18)
 Executive Cash Incentive Plan
10.17+(12)
 Employment Offer Letter from Company to Michael A. Doyle dated July 24, 2007
10.18+(14)
 Employment Agreement between Forrester Research B.V. and Dennis Van Lingen dated as of June 20, 2000, and Addendum thereto dated May 21, 2001
10.19(19)
 Lease dated May 6, 1999 between Technology Square LLC and the Company for the premises located at 400 Technology Square, Cambridge, Massachusetts
10.20(5)
 Fifth Amendment to Lease dated as of January 1, 2005 between Technology Square Finance, LLC and the Company for the premises located at 400 Technology Square, Cambridge, Massachusetts
10.21(14)
 Sixth Amendment to Lease date as of April 22, 2008 between ARE-Tech Square, LLC and Forrester Research, Inc. for the premises located at 400 Technology Square, Cambridge, Massachusetts
10.22(20)
 Lease of Premises at Cambridge Discovery Park, Cambridge, Massachusetts dated as of September 29, 2009 from BHX, LLC, as Trustee of Acorn Park I Realty Trust to the Company
10.23(15)
 First Amendment of Lease dated as of December 21, 2009 by 200 Discovery Park, LLC, successor to BHX, LLC, as Trustee of Acorn Park I Realty Trust, and the Company
10.24(20)
 Agreement Regarding Project Rights dated as of September 29, 2009, by BHX, LLC, a Massachusetts limited liability company, as Trustee of Acorn Park I Realty Trust, a Massachusetts nominee trust, and the Company
14.1(12)
 Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
21(15)
 Subsidiaries of the Registrant
23.1(15)
 Consent of BDO Seidman, LLP
31.1(15)
 Certification of the Principal Executive Officer
31.2(15)
 Certification of the Principal Financial Officer


33


 

   
Exhibit No.
 
Description
 
32.1(15)
 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2(15)
 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
+ Denotes management contract or compensation arrangements.
 
(1) Filed as an Exhibit to Forrester’s Current Report onForm 8-Kfiled on January 22, 2003 (FileNo. 000-21433)and incorporated herein by reference.
 
(2) Filed as an Exhibit to Forrester’s Registration Statement onForm S-1filed on September 26, 1996 (FileNo. 333-12761)and incorporated by reference herein.
 
(3) Filed as an Exhibit to Forrester’s Annual Report onForm 10-Kfor the year ended December 31, 1999 (FileNo. 000-21433)and incorporated by reference herein.
 
(4) Filed as an exhibit to Forrester’s Current Report onForm 8-Kfiled on February 4, 2010 (FileNo. 000-21433)and incorporated herein by reference.
 
(5) Filed as an Exhibit to Forrester’s Annual Report on10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 (FileNo. 000-21433)and incorporated herein by reference.
 
(6) Filed as an Exhibit to Forrester’s Quarterly Report onForm 10-Qfor the quarterly period ended March 31, 2002 (FileNo. 000-21433)and incorporated herein by reference.
 
(7) Filed as an exhibit to Forrester’s Quarterly Report onForm 10-Qfor the quarter ended June 30, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference.
 
(8) Filed as an Exhibit to Forrester’s Quarterly Report onForm 10-Qfor the quarter ended September 30, 2004 (FileNo. 000-21433)and incorporated herein by reference.
 
(9) Filed as an Exhibit to Forrester’s Quarterly Report onForm 10-Qfor the quarter ended March 31, 2005 (FileNo. 000-21433)and incorporated herein by reference.
 
(10) Filed as an Exhibit to Forrester’s Quarterly Report onForm 10-Qfor the quarter ended June 30, 2005 (FileNo. 000-21433)and incorporated herein by reference.
 
(11) Filed as an exhibit to Forrester’s Quarterly Report onForm 10-Qfor the quarter ended September 30, 2006 (FileNo. 000-21433)and incorporated herein by reference.
 
(12) Filed as an Exhibit to Forrester’s Annual Report onForm 10-Kfor the year ended December 31, 2006 (FileNo. 000-21433)and incorporated herein by reference.
 
(13) Included in Forrester’s Current Report onForm 8-Kfiled on January 24, 2007 (File No.000-21433)and incorporated herein by reference.
 
(14) Filed as an Exhibit to Forrester’s Quarterly Report onForm 10-Qfor the quarter ended March 31, 2008 (FileNo. 000-21433)and incorporated herein by reference.
 
(15) Filed herewith.
 
(16) Included as Exhibit A in Forrester’s Proxy Statement for its 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders filed on April 3, 2009 (FileNo. 000-21433)and incorporated herein by reference.
 
(17) Filed as an exhibit to Forrester’s Quarterly Report onForm 10-Qfor the quarter ended June 30, 2009 (FileNo. 000-21433)and incorporated herein by reference.
 
(18) Filed as an exhibit to Forrester’s Current Report onForm 8-Kfiled on February 17, 2010 (FileNo. 000-21433)and incorporated herein by reference.
 
(19) Filed as an exhibit to Forrester’s Quarterly Report onForm 10-Qfor the quarter ended June 30, 1999 (FileNo. 000-21433)and incorporated herein by reference.
 
(20) Filed as an exhibit to Forrester’s Quarterly Report onForm 10-Qfor the quarter ended September 30, 2009 (File No000-21433)and incorporated herein by reference.


34


 

SIGNATURES
 
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
FORRESTER RESEARCH, INC.
 
  By: 
/s/  GEORGE F. COLONY
George F. Colony
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
 
Date: March 12, 2010
 
Pursuant to the requirement of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the registrant in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
 
       
Signature
 
Capacity In Which Signed
 
Date
 
     
/s/  GEORGE F. COLONY

George F. Colony
 Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) March 12, 2010
     
/s/  MICHAEL A. DOYLE

Michael A. Doyle
 Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) March 12, 2010
     
/s/  SCOTT R. CHOUINARD

Scott R. Chouinard
 Chief Accounting Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) March 12, 2010
     
/s/  HENK W. BROEDERS

Henk W. Broeders
 Member of the Board of Directors March 12, 2010
     
/s/  ROBERT M. GALFORD

Robert M. Galford
 Member of the Board of Directors March 12, 2010
     
/s/  GEORGE R. HORNIG

George R. Hornig
 Member of the Board of Directors March 12, 2010
     
/s/  GRETCHEN TEICHGRAEBER

Gretchen Teichgraeber
 Member of the Board of Directors March 12, 2010
     
/s/  MICHAEL H. WELLES

Michael H. Welles
 Member of the Board of Directors March 12, 2010


35