Companies:
10,652
total market cap:
$141.907 T
Sign In
๐บ๐ธ
EN
English
$ USD
โฌ
EUR
๐ช๐บ
โน
INR
๐ฎ๐ณ
ยฃ
GBP
๐ฌ๐ง
$
CAD
๐จ๐ฆ
$
AUD
๐ฆ๐บ
$
NZD
๐ณ๐ฟ
$
HKD
๐ญ๐ฐ
$
SGD
๐ธ๐ฌ
Global ranking
Ranking by countries
America
๐บ๐ธ United States
๐จ๐ฆ Canada
๐ฒ๐ฝ Mexico
๐ง๐ท Brazil
๐จ๐ฑ Chile
Europe
๐ช๐บ European Union
๐ฉ๐ช Germany
๐ฌ๐ง United Kingdom
๐ซ๐ท France
๐ช๐ธ Spain
๐ณ๐ฑ Netherlands
๐ธ๐ช Sweden
๐ฎ๐น Italy
๐จ๐ญ Switzerland
๐ต๐ฑ Poland
๐ซ๐ฎ Finland
Asia
๐จ๐ณ China
๐ฏ๐ต Japan
๐ฐ๐ท South Korea
๐ญ๐ฐ Hong Kong
๐ธ๐ฌ Singapore
๐ฎ๐ฉ Indonesia
๐ฎ๐ณ India
๐ฒ๐พ Malaysia
๐น๐ผ Taiwan
๐น๐ญ Thailand
๐ป๐ณ Vietnam
Others
๐ฆ๐บ Australia
๐ณ๐ฟ New Zealand
๐ฎ๐ฑ Israel
๐ธ๐ฆ Saudi Arabia
๐น๐ท Turkey
๐ท๐บ Russia
๐ฟ๐ฆ South Africa
>> All Countries
Ranking by categories
๐ All assets by Market Cap
๐ Automakers
โ๏ธ Airlines
๐ซ Airports
โ๏ธ Aircraft manufacturers
๐ฆ Banks
๐จ Hotels
๐ Pharmaceuticals
๐ E-Commerce
โ๏ธ Healthcare
๐ฆ Courier services
๐ฐ Media/Press
๐ท Alcoholic beverages
๐ฅค Beverages
๐ Clothing
โ๏ธ Mining
๐ Railways
๐ฆ Insurance
๐ Real estate
โ Ports
๐ผ Professional services
๐ด Food
๐ Restaurant chains
โ๐ป Software
๐ Semiconductors
๐ฌ Tobacco
๐ณ Financial services
๐ข Oil&Gas
๐ Electricity
๐งช Chemicals
๐ฐ Investment
๐ก Telecommunication
๐๏ธ Retail
๐ฅ๏ธ Internet
๐ Construction
๐ฎ Video Game
๐ป Tech
๐ฆพ AI
>> All Categories
ETFs
๐ All ETFs
๐๏ธ Bond ETFs
๏ผ Dividend ETFs
โฟ Bitcoin ETFs
โข Ethereum ETFs
๐ช Crypto Currency ETFs
๐ฅ Gold ETFs & ETCs
๐ฅ Silver ETFs & ETCs
๐ข๏ธ Oil ETFs & ETCs
๐ฝ Commodities ETFs & ETNs
๐ Emerging Markets ETFs
๐ Small-Cap ETFs
๐ Low volatility ETFs
๐ Inverse/Bear ETFs
โฌ๏ธ Leveraged ETFs
๐ Global/World ETFs
๐บ๐ธ USA ETFs
๐บ๐ธ S&P 500 ETFs
๐บ๐ธ Dow Jones ETFs
๐ช๐บ Europe ETFs
๐จ๐ณ China ETFs
๐ฏ๐ต Japan ETFs
๐ฎ๐ณ India ETFs
๐ฌ๐ง UK ETFs
๐ฉ๐ช Germany ETFs
๐ซ๐ท France ETFs
โ๏ธ Mining ETFs
โ๏ธ Gold Mining ETFs
โ๏ธ Silver Mining ETFs
๐งฌ Biotech ETFs
๐ฉโ๐ป Tech ETFs
๐ Real Estate ETFs
โ๏ธ Healthcare ETFs
โก Energy ETFs
๐ Renewable Energy ETFs
๐ก๏ธ Insurance ETFs
๐ฐ Water ETFs
๐ด Food & Beverage ETFs
๐ฑ Socially Responsible ETFs
๐ฃ๏ธ Infrastructure ETFs
๐ก Innovation ETFs
๐ Semiconductors ETFs
๐ Aerospace & Defense ETFs
๐ Cybersecurity ETFs
๐ฆพ Artificial Intelligence ETFs
Watchlist
Account
Illumina
ILMN
#1276
Rank
$18.33 B
Marketcap
๐บ๐ธ
United States
Country
$119.32
Share price
1.77%
Change (1 day)
13.65%
Change (1 year)
๐งฌ Biotech
๐ญ Manufacturing
๐งฌ Genomics
Categories
Market cap
Revenue
Earnings
Price history
P/E ratio
P/S ratio
More
Price history
P/E ratio
P/S ratio
P/B ratio
Operating margin
EPS
Stock Splits
Shares outstanding
Fails to deliver
Cost to borrow
Total assets
Total liabilities
Total debt
Cash on Hand
Net Assets
Annual Reports (10-K)
Illumina
Quarterly Reports (10-Q)
Financial Year FY2013 Q1
Illumina - 10-Q quarterly report FY2013 Q1
Text size:
Small
Medium
Large
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
þ
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the Quarterly Period Ended
March 31, 2013
¨
Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 001-35406
Illumina, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
33-0804655
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
5200 Illumina Way,
San Diego, CA
92122
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
(858) 202-4500
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
þ
No
¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
þ
No
¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.:
Large accelerated filer
þ
Accelerated filer
¨
Non-accelerated filer
¨
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company
¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes
¨
No
þ
As of
April 12, 2013
, there were
124,378,537
shares of the registrant’s Common Stock outstanding.
Table of Contents
ILLUMINA, INC.
INDEX
Page
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
3
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2013 (Unaudited) and December 30, 2012
3
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2013 and April 1, 2012 (Unaudited)
4
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2013 and April 1, 2012 (Unaudited)
5
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2013 and April 1, 2012 (Unaudited)
6
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
7
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
22
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
30
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
30
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
31
Item 1A. Risk Factors
31
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
31
Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities
32
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
32
Item 5. Other Information
32
Item 6. Exhibits
32
SIGNATURES
33
2
Table of Contents
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
ILLUMINA, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands)
March 31,
2013
December 30,
2012
(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
$
443,082
$
433,981
Short-term investments
624,388
916,223
Accounts receivable, net
210,831
214,975
Inventory
167,959
158,718
Deferred tax assets, current portion
73,988
30,451
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
30,525
32,700
Total current assets
1,550,773
1,787,048
Property and equipment, net
186,792
166,167
Goodwill
604,493
369,327
Intangible assets, net
307,214
130,196
Deferred tax assets, long-term portion
21,646
40,183
Other assets
73,270
73,164
Total assets
$
2,744,188
$
2,566,085
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable
$
76,627
$
65,727
Accrued liabilities
188,751
201,877
Accrued legal contingencies
106,922
—
Long-term debt, current portion
37,641
36,967
Total current liabilities
409,941
304,571
Long-term debt
813,741
805,406
Other long-term liabilities
206,195
134,369
Conversion option subject to cash settlement
2,484
3,158
Stockholders
’
equity:
Preferred stock
—
—
Common stock
1,711
1,703
Additional paid-in capital
2,463,555
2,419,831
Accumulated other comprehensive income
1,703
2,123
Retained earnings
59,960
82,547
Treasury stock, at cost
(1,215,102
)
(1,187,623
)
Total stockholders
’
equity
1,311,827
1,318,581
Total liabilities and stockholders
’
equity
$
2,744,188
$
2,566,085
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
ILLUMINA, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Three Months Ended
March 31,
2013
April 1,
2012
Revenue:
Product revenue
$
296,170
$
255,636
Service and other revenue
34,788
17,134
Total revenue
330,958
272,770
Cost of revenue:
Cost of product revenue
89,978
80,151
Cost of service and other revenue
15,138
8,565
Amortization of acquired intangible assets
6,550
3,043
Total cost of revenue
111,666
91,759
Gross profit
219,292
181,011
Operating expense:
Research and development
61,450
48,839
Selling, general and administrative
85,074
67,969
Legal contingencies
105,853
—
Unsolicited tender offer related expense
7,484
8,092
Acquisition related expense, net
3,821
1,737
Headquarter relocation expense
757
2,140
Restructuring charges
—
2,622
Total operating expense
264,439
131,399
Income (loss) from operations
(45,147
)
49,612
Other income (expense):
Cost-method investment related gain
6,113
—
Interest income
1,933
2,526
Interest expense
(9,747
)
(9,202
)
Other expense, net
(714
)
(2,663
)
Total other expense, net
(2,415
)
(9,339
)
Income (loss) before income taxes
(47,562
)
40,273
Provision for (benefit from) for income taxes
(24,975
)
14,071
Net income (loss)
$
(22,587
)
$
26,202
Net income (loss) per basic share
$
(0.18
)
$
0.21
Net income (loss) per diluted share
$
(0.18
)
$
0.20
Shares used in calculating basic net income (loss) per share
123,768
122,642
Shares used in calculating diluted net income (loss) per share
123,768
133,859
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
ILLUMINA, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
Three Months Ended
March 31,
2013
April 1,
2012
Net income (loss)
$
(22,587
)
$
26,202
Unrealized (loss) gain on available-for-sale securities, net of deferred tax
(420
)
145
Total comprehensive income (loss)
$
(23,007
)
$
26,347
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
ILLUMINA, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
Three Months Ended
March 31,
2013
April 1,
2012
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)
$
(22,587
)
$
26,202
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation expense
11,759
11,959
Amortization of intangible assets
8,772
3,468
Share-based compensation expense
24,219
23,029
Accretion of debt discount
9,009
8,599
Contingent compensation expense
1,393
2,921
Incremental tax benefit related to share-based compensation
(5,278
)
(9,494
)
Deferred income taxes
(36,704
)
(5,323
)
Change in fair value of contingent consideration
464
1,737
Cost-method investment related gain
(6,113
)
—
Other
4,107
3,341
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable
6,129
(29,158
)
Inventory
(8,266
)
159
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
1,536
1,231
Other assets
(2,088
)
(2,126
)
Accounts payable
8,459
10,259
Accrued liabilities
(15,267
)
14,223
Accrued legal contingencies
106,922
—
Other long-term liabilities
1,374
4,413
Net cash provided by operating activities
87,840
65,440
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of available-for-sale securities
(97,480
)
(331,652
)
Sales of available-for-sale securities
322,955
188,766
Maturities of available-for-sale securities
66,559
21,600
Net cash paid for acquisitions
(345,111
)
—
Purchases of strategic investments
—
(7,500
)
Proceeds from sale of strategic investment
9,998
—
Purchases of property and equipment
(21,441
)
(13,084
)
Cash paid for intangible assets
(501
)
—
Net cash used in investing activities
(65,021
)
(141,870
)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Payments on long-term financing obligation
(58
)
—
Payments on acquisition related contingent consideration liability
(3,985
)
—
Incremental tax benefit related to share-based compensation
5,278
9,494
Common stock repurchases
(25,011
)
—
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
10,770
24,122
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
(13,006
)
33,616
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
(712
)
30
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
9,101
(42,784
)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
433,981
302,978
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$
443,082
$
260,194
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
Table of Contents
Illumina, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Unless the context requires otherwise, references in this report to
“
Illumina,” “we,” “us,” the “Company,” and “our” refer to Illumina, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for interim financial information and the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. In management’s opinion, the accompanying financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, considered necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim periods presented.
Interim financial results are not necessarily indicative of results anticipated for the full year. These unaudited financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited financial statements and footnotes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 30, 2012, from which the balance sheet information herein was derived.
The preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Fiscal Year
The Company’s fiscal year consists of 52 or 53 weeks ending the Sunday closest to December 31, with quarters of 13 or 14 weeks ending the Sunday closest to March 31, June 30, September 30, and December 31. The
three
months ended
March 31, 2013
and
April 1, 2012
were both 13 weeks.
Reclassifications
Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.
Revenue Recognition
The Company’s revenue is generated primarily from the sale of products and services. Product revenue primarily consists of sales of instrumentation and consumables used in genetic analysis. Service and other revenue primarily consists of revenue received for performing genotyping and sequencing services, instrument service contract sales, and amounts earned under research agreements with government grants, which are recognized in the period during which the related costs are incurred.
The Company recognizes revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the seller’s price to the buyer is fixed or determinable, and collectibility is reasonably assured. In instances where final acceptance of the product or system is required, revenue is deferred until all the acceptance criteria have been met. All revenue is recorded net of any discounts.
Revenue from product sales is recognized generally upon transfer of title to the customer, provided that no significant obligations remain and collection of the receivable is reasonably assured. Revenue from instrument service contracts is recognized as the services are rendered, typically evenly over the contract term. Revenue from genotyping and sequencing services is recognized when earned, which is generally at the time the genotyping or sequencing analysis data is made available to the customer or agreed upon milestones are reached.
In order to assess whether the price is fixed or determinable, the Company evaluates whether refund rights exist. If there are refund rights or payment terms based on future performance, the Company defers revenue recognition until the price
7
Table of Contents
becomes fixed or determinable. The Company assesses collectibility based on a number of factors, including past transaction history with the customer and the creditworthiness of the customer. If the Company determines that collection of a payment is not reasonably assured, revenue recognition is deferred until receipt of payment.
The Company regularly enters into contracts where revenue is derived from multiple deliverables including any mix of products or services. These products or services are generally delivered within a short time frame, approximately
three
to
six months
, after the contract execution date. Revenue recognition for contracts with multiple deliverables is based on the individual units of accounting determined to exist in the contract. A delivered item is considered a separate unit of accounting when the delivered item has value to the customer on a stand-alone basis. Items are considered to have stand-alone value when they are sold separately by any vendor or when the customer could resell the item on a stand-alone basis. Consideration is allocated at the inception of the contract to all deliverables based on their relative selling price. The relative selling price for each deliverable is determined using vendor specific objective evidence (VSOE) of selling price or third-party evidence of selling price if VSOE does not exist. If neither VSOE nor third-party evidence exists, the Company uses its best estimate of the selling price for the deliverable.
In order to establish VSOE of selling price, the Company must regularly sell the product or service on a standalone basis with a substantial majority priced within a relatively narrow range. VSOE of selling price is usually the midpoint of that range. If there are not a sufficient number of standalone sales and VSOE of selling price cannot be determined, then the Company considers whether third party evidence can be used to establish selling price. Due to the lack of similar products and services sold by other companies within the industry, the Company has rarely established selling price using third-party evidence. If neither VSOE nor third party evidence of selling price exists, the Company determines its best estimate of selling price using average selling prices over a rolling 12-month period coupled with an assessment of current market conditions. If the product or service has no history of sales or if the sales volume is not sufficient, the Company relies upon prices set by the Company’s pricing committee adjusted for applicable discounts. The Company recognizes revenue for delivered elements only when it determines there are no uncertainties regarding customer acceptance.
In certain markets, the Company sells products and provides services to customers through distributors that specialize in life science products. In most sales through distributors, the product is delivered directly to customers. In cases where the product is delivered to a distributor, revenue recognition is deferred until acceptance is received from the distributor, and/or the end-user, if required by the applicable sales contract. The terms of sales transactions through distributors are consistent with the terms of direct sales to customers. These transactions are accounted for in accordance with the Company’s revenue recognition policy described herein.
Fair Value Measurements
The Company determines the fair value of its assets and liabilities based on the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The Company uses a fair value hierarchy with three levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable, to measure fair value:
•
Level 1 —
Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
•
Level 2 —
Inputs, other than Level 1, that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
•
Level 3 —
Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.
The carrying amounts of financial instruments such as cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, prepaid expenses and other current assets, accounts payable, and accrued liabilities, excluding acquisition related contingent consideration liabilities, approximate the related fair values due to the short-term maturities of these instruments.
Derivatives
The Company is exposed to foreign exchange rate risks in the normal course of business. To manage a portion of the accounting exposure resulting from changes in foreign currency exchange rates, the Company enters into foreign exchange contracts to hedge monetary assets and liabilities that are denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. These foreign exchange contracts are carried at fair value and are not designated as hedging instruments. Changes in the value of the
8
Table of Contents
derivative are recognized in other expense, net, along with an offsetting remeasurement gain or loss on the underlying foreign currency denominated assets or liabilities.
As of
March 31, 2013
, the Company had foreign exchange forward contracts in place to hedge exposures in the euro, Japanese yen, and Australian dollar. As of
March 31, 2013
and
December 30, 2012
, the total notional amount of outstanding forward contracts in place for foreign currency purchases were approximately
$48.0 million
and
$51.2 million
, respectively. Gains and losses related to the non-designated foreign exchange forward contracts for the
three
months ended
March 31, 2013
and
April 1, 2012
were immaterial.
Leases
Leases are reviewed and classified as capital or operating at their inception. For leases that contain rent escalations, the Company records rent expense on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease, which includes the construction build-out period and lease extension periods, if appropriate. The difference between rent payments and straight-line rent expense is recorded as deferred rent in accrued liabilities and other long-term liabilities. Landlord allowances are amortized on a straight-line basis over the lease term as a reduction to rent expense. The Company capitalizes leasehold improvements and amortizes them over the shorter of the lease term or their expected useful lives.
In 2012, the Company completed the relocation of its headquarters to another facility in San Diego, California. Headquarter relocation expenses consist of expenses such as accelerated depreciation expense, impairment of assets, additional rent expense during the transition period when both the new and former headquarter facilities are occupied, moving expenses, cease-use losses, and accretion of interest expense on lease exit liability. The Company recorded accelerated depreciation expense for leasehold improvements at its former headquarter facility based on the reassessed useful lives of less than a year. The Company recorded cease-use losses and the corresponding facility exit obligation upon vacating its former headquarters, calculated as the present value of the remaining lease obligation offset by estimated sublease rental receipts during the remaining lease period, adjusted for deferred items and estimated lease incentives. The key assumptions used in the calculation include the amount and timing of estimated sublease rental receipts, and the risk-adjusted discount rate. During the
three
months ended
March 31, 2013
, the Company entered into an agreement to sublease a section of its former headquarters. The sublease has an initial term of approximately
ten
years. Total minimum lease payments during the initial term of the sublease is expected to be
$18.7 million
. In conjunction with the sublease, the Company issued a letter of credit in the amount of
$6.0 million
, which will decrease ratably to zero over the term of the sublease.
Net Income (Loss) per Share
Basic net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the reporting period. Diluted net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the reporting period increased to include dilutive potential common shares calculated using the treasury stock method. Diluted net income (loss) per share reflects the potential dilution from outstanding stock options, restricted stock units, shares issuable under the employee stock purchase plan (ESPP), warrants, shares subject to forfeiture, and convertible senior notes. Under the treasury stock method, convertible senior notes will have a dilutive impact when the average market price of the Company’s common stock is above the applicable conversion price of the respective notes. In addition, the following amounts are assumed to be used to repurchase shares: the amount that must be paid to exercise stock options and warrants and purchase shares under the ESPP; the average amount of compensation expense for future services that the Company has not yet recognized for stock options, restricted stock units, ESPP shares, and shares subject to forfeiture; and the amount of tax benefits that will be recorded in additional paid-in capital when the expenses related to respective awards become deductible. In loss periods, basic net loss per share and diluted net loss per share are identical since the effect of otherwise dilutive potential common shares is anti-dilutive and therefore excluded.
9
Table of Contents
The following table presents the calculation of weighted average shares used to calculate basic and diluted net income (loss) per share (in thousands):
Three Months Ended
March 31,
2013
April 1,
2012
Weighted average shares outstanding
123,768
122,642
Effect of dilutive potential common shares from:
Convertible senior notes
—
991
Equity awards
—
4,060
Warrants sold in connection with convertible senior notes
—
6,166
Weighted average shares used in calculation of diluted net income (loss) per share
123,768
133,859
Potentially dilutive shares excluded from calculation due to anti-dilutive effect
32,942
2,538
2. Balance Sheet Account Details
Short-Term Investments
The following is a summary of short-term investments (in thousands):
March 31, 2013
December 30, 2012
Amortized
Cost
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Estimated
Fair Value
Amortized
Cost
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Estimated
Fair Value
Available-for-sale securities:
Debt securities in government sponsored entities
$
191,797
$
377
$
(12
)
$
192,162
$
314,638
$
251
$
(16
)
$
314,873
Corporate debt securities
367,323
386
(236
)
367,473
471,989
1,059
(187
)
472,861
U.S. Treasury securities
64,602
151
—
64,753
128,256
233
—
128,489
Total available-for-sale securities
$
623,722
$
914
$
(248
)
$
624,388
$
914,883
$
1,543
$
(203
)
$
916,223
As of
March 31, 2013
, the Company had
57
available-for-sale securities in a gross unrealized loss position, all of which had been in such position for less than twelve months. There were
no
impairments considered other-than-temporary as it is more likely than not the Company will hold the securities until maturity or until the cost basis is recovered.
The following table shows the fair values and the gross unrealized losses of the Company’s available-for-sale securities that were in an unrealized loss position as of
March 31, 2013
and
December 30, 2012
, aggregated by investment category (in thousands):
March 31, 2013
December 30, 2012
Fair Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Debt securities in government sponsored entities
$
47,752
$
(12
)
$
28,176
$
(16
)
Corporate debt securities
85,884
(236
)
130,224
(187
)
Total
$
133,636
$
(248
)
$
158,400
$
(203
)
Realized gains and losses are determined based on the specific identification method and are reported in interest income. Gross realized gains and losses on sales of available-for-sale securities for the
three
months ended
March 31, 2013
and
April 1, 2012
were immaterial.
10
Table of Contents
Contractual maturities of available-for-sale debt securities as of
March 31, 2013
were as follows (in thousands):
Estimated
Fair Value
Due within one year
$
187,606
After one but within five years
436,782
Total
$
624,388
Cost-Method Investments
As of
March 31, 2013
and
December 30, 2012
, the aggregate carrying amounts of the Company’s cost-method investments in non-publicly traded companies were
$52.4 million
and
$56.3 million
, respectively, which were included in other assets on the consolidated balance sheets. During the
three
months ended
March 31, 2013
, the Company sold a cost-method investment and recognized a
$6.1 million
gain. The Company assesses all cost-method investments for impairment quarterly.
No
impairment loss was recorded during the
three
months ended
March 31, 2013
or
April 1, 2012
. The Company does not reassess the fair value of cost-method investments if there are no identified events or changes in circumstances that may have a significant adverse effect on the fair value of the investments.
Headquarter Facility Exit Obligation
Changes in the Company’s facility exit obligation related to its former headquarters lease during the
three
months ended
March 31, 2013
are as follows (in thousands):
Balance as of December 30, 2012
$
45,352
Additional facility exit obligation accrued
286
Accretion of interest expense
471
Cash settlements
(2,201
)
Balance as of March 31, 2013
$
43,908
Warranties
Changes in the Company’s reserve for product warranties from
December 30, 2012
through
March 31, 2013
are as follows (in thousands):
Balance as of December 30, 2012
$
10,136
Additions charged to cost of revenue
5,421
Repairs and replacements
(4,751
)
Balance as of March 31, 2013
$
10,806
Inventory
Inventory consists of the following (in thousands):
March 31,
2013
December 30,
2012
Raw materials
$
66,589
$
61,665
Work in process
75,496
75,675
Finished goods
25,874
21,378
Total inventory
$
167,959
$
158,718
11
Table of Contents
Accrued Liabilities
Accrued liabilities consist of the following (in thousands):
March 31,
2013
December 30,
2012
Accrued compensation expenses
$
48,933
$
59,864
Deferred revenue, current portion
45,931
55,817
Accrued taxes payable
24,638
23,021
Customer deposits
17,468
13,765
Unsettled short-term investment purchase
11,050
9,154
Reserve for product warranties
10,806
10,136
Facility exit obligation, current portion
7,255
8,063
Acquisition related contingent liability, current portion
5,825
9,490
Accrued royalties
2,697
2,836
Other
14,148
9,731
Total accrued liabilities
$
188,751
$
201,877
3. Acquisitions
Current Period Acquisitions
On February 21, 2013, the Company acquired all of the outstanding capital stock of Verinata Health, Inc. (Verinata), a leading provider of non-invasive tests for the early identification of fetal chromosomal abnormalities. With this acquisition, the Company strengthened its reproductive health diagnostic portfolio by gaining access to Verinata's verifi® non-invasive prenatal test (NIPT) as well as what management believes to be the most comprehensive intellectual property portfolio in the NIPT industry.
The contractual price for the acquisition was
$350.0 million
, plus potential cash payments of up to
$100.0 million
based on the achievement of certain regulatory and revenue milestones. The aggregate purchase price was determined to be
$401.1 million
, including total cash payment of
$339.2 million
,
$61.1 million
in fair value of the contingent milestone payments,
$0.3 million
in fair value of converted stock options attributed to pre-combination services, and
$0.5 million
in loss realized on settlement of preexisting relationships. In connection with the transaction, the Company deposited into escrow
$30.0 million
of consideration otherwise payable to shareholders of Verinata. This amount is included in the aggregate consideration and will be held in escrow to cover indemnification claims under the acquisition agreement, if any, for a period of
1.5 years
following the completion of the acquisition. The Company’s consolidated financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2013 reflected revenue of
$0.9 million
and net loss of
$4.0 million
from Verinata since the acquisition date. During the three months ended March 31, 2013, transaction costs of
$3.2 million
were expensed as incurred in acquisition related expense, net.
In conjunction with the acquisition, the Company assumed the Verinata Health, Inc. 2008 Stock Plan and converted, as of the acquisition date, the unvested stock options outstanding under the plan, all of which were in the money, into
0.4 million
unvested stock options to purchase Illumina’s common stock, retaining the original vesting schedules. The fair value of all converted options was
$18.8 million
,
$0.3 million
of which was attributed to the pre-combination service period and was included in the calculation of purchase price. The remaining fair value will be recognized over the awards’ remaining vesting periods subsequent to the acquisition. The weighted-average acquisition-date fair value of the converted options was determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: (i) market price of
$48.36
per share, which was the closing price of Illumina's common stock on the acquisition date; (ii) weighted average expected term of
2.2 years
; (iii) weighted average risk-free interest rate of
0.29%
; (iv) weighted average annualized volatility of
42%
; and (v)
no
dividend yield. The weighted average acquisition-date fair value per share of the assumed stock options was
$42.59
.
On the acquisition date, a liability of
$61.1 million
was recorded for an estimate of the acquisition date fair value of the contingent consideration. Any change in the fair value of the contingent milestone consideration subsequent to the acquisition date was and will be recognized in the statements of operations. The fair value of the regulatory milestone payments was measured by the probability-weighted discounted cash flows and the fair value of the revenue milestone payments was measured using a risk-neutral option pricing model, which captures the present value of the expected payment and the probability of reaching the revenue targets. Key assumptions used in the fair value assessments included discount rates ranging
12
Table of Contents
from
6%
to
20%
, volatility of
50%
, risk-free rates of
0.26%
, revenue projections, and the probability of achieving regulatory milestones. This fair value measurement of the contingent consideration is based on significant inputs not observed in the market and thus represents a Level 3 measurement. Level 3 instruments are valued based on unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and reflect the Company's own assumptions in measuring fair value.
The allocation of the purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed was as follows (in thousands):
Allocation of purchase price
Cash and cash equivalents
$
9,151
Accounts receivable
3,452
Inventory
1,110
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
953
Property and equipment
12,369
Other assets
978
Intangible assets
170,190
Goodwill
229,120
Accounts payable
(2,539
)
Accrued liabilities
(3,670
)
Lease financing obligation
(9,416
)
Deferred tax liability
(10,572
)
Total purchase price
$
401,126
In conjunction with the acquisition, the Company assumed Verinata’s building lease, for which Verinata was considered the accounting owner of the leased building and as such, recorded the fair value of the building as an asset as of the acquisition date. The building is depreciated over a useful life of
30 years
. The Company also recorded the related lease financing obligation as a liability assumed, representing the present value of all remaining building lease payments and a balloon payment at the end of the lease for the value of the building to be transferred to the landlord. As of the acquisition date, total remaining payments under the lease was
$5.7 million
and the remaining lease term was
4.7 years
, with
two
three
-year renewal options.
The following table summarizes the fair value of identifiable intangible assets acquired (amounts in thousands):
Weighted Average Useful Lives (in years)
Fair Value
Developed technology
13
$
164,100
Customer relationships
5
4,690
Trade name
2
1,400
Total intangible assets acquired, excluding goodwill
$
170,190
The fair value of the developed technology and trade name was estimated using an income approach. Under the income approach, an intangible asset’s fair value is equal to the present value of future economic benefits to be derived from ownership of the asset. The estimated fair value was developed by discounting future net cash flows to their present value at market-based rates of return. The fair value of the customer relationships was developed using a cost approach by estimating the time and personnel effort in constructing the customer base. The useful life of the intangible assets for amortization purposes was determined by considering the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the intangible assets adjusted as appropriate for the entity-specific factors including legal, regulatory, contractual, competitive economic or other factors that may limit the useful life of intangible assets.
The excess of the fair value of the total consideration over the estimated fair value of the net assets was recorded as goodwill, which was primarily attributable to the synergies expected from combining the technologies of Illumina with those of Verinata, including complementary products that will enhance the Company’s overall product portfolio, and the value of the workforce that became our employees following the closing of the acquisitions. The goodwill recognized is not expected to be deductible for income tax purposes.
13
Table of Contents
As of March 31, 2013, the accounting for the Verinata acquisition had not been finalized due to pending items on the valuation of acquired assets and liabilities, including the valuation of certain deferred tax benefits. Based on a preliminary assessment, the Company recorded estimated amounts for these items in its condensed consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 2013. During the measurement period, the Company may record adjustments to the estimated amounts recorded.
In addition, the Company completed another acquisition of a development-stage company during the
three
months ended
March 31, 2013
. As a result of this transaction, the Company recorded goodwill of
$6.0 million
and developed technology of
$15.6 million
with a useful life of
five years
.
Pro Forma Information
The following unaudited pro forma information presents the consolidated results of operations of Illumina and Verinata as if the acquisition had occurred at the beginning of each period presented, with pro forma adjustments to give effect to inter-company transactions to be eliminated, amortization of intangible assets, share-based compensation, and transaction costs directly associated with the acquisition (in thousands, except per share amounts):
Three Months Ended
March 31, 2013
April 1, 2012
Net revenues
$
330,994
$
271,067
Net income (loss)
$
(31,256
)
$
14,959
Net income (loss) per share-basic
$
(0.25
)
$
0.12
Net income (loss) per share-diluted
$
(0.25
)
$
0.11
These unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial results have been prepared for illustrative purposes only and do not purport to be indicative of the results of operations that actually would have resulted had the acquisition occurred on the first day of the earliest period presented, or of the future results of the consolidated entities. The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial information does not reflect any operating efficiencies and cost savings that may be realized from the integration of the acquisition.
Prior Year Acquisitions
On September 19, 2012, the Company announced the acquisition of BlueGnome Ltd (BlueGnome), a provider of cytogenetics and in vitro fertilization screening products. Total consideration for the acquisition was
$95.5 million
, which included
$88.0 million
in initial cash payments and
$7.5 million
in fair value of contingent cash consideration of up to
$20.0 million
based on the achievement of certain revenue based milestones by December 28, 2014.
The Company estimated the fair value of contingent cash consideration using a probability weighted discounted cash flow approach, a Level 3 measurement based on unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and reflect the Company’s own assumptions in measuring fair value. The Company used a discount rate of
30%
in the assessment of the acquisition date fair value for the contingent cash consideration. Future changes in significant inputs such as the discount rate and estimated probabilities of milestone achievements could have a significant effect on the fair value of the contingent consideration.
In conjunction with the purchase transaction, the Company also agreed to pay up to
$20.0 million
to BlueGnome shareholders contingent upon the retention of certain key employees and certain other criteria. Such contingent payments will be recognized as contingent compensation expense over the retention period through December 28, 2014.
The Company allocated approximately
$11.2 million
of the total consideration to tangible assets, net of liabilities, and
$48.9 million
to identified intangible assets, including additional developed technologies of
$25.0 million
, customer relationships of
$16.8 million
, and a trade name of
$7.1 million
with average useful lives of
seven
,
five
, and
ten years
, respectively. The Company also recorded a
$12.1 million
deferred tax liability to reflect the tax impact of certain identified intangible assets, the amortization expenses for which are not tax deductible. The Company recorded the excess consideration of approximately
$47.5 million
as goodwill.
On
January 10, 2011
, the Company acquired Epicentre Technologies Corporation (Epicentre), a provider of nucleic acid sample preparation reagents and specialty enzymes used in sequencing and microarray applications. Total consideration for the acquisition was
$71.4 million
, which included
$59.4 million
in net cash payments made at closing,
$4.6 million
in the fair value
14
Table of Contents
of contingent consideration settled in stock that is subject to forfeiture if certain non-revenue based milestones are not met, and
$7.4 million
in the fair value of contingent cash consideration of up to
$15.0 million
based on the achievement of certain revenue based milestones by
January 10, 2013
.
The Company estimated the fair value of contingent stock consideration based on the closing price of its common stock as of the acquisition date. Approximately
229,000
shares of common stock were issued to Epicentre shareholders in connection with the acquisition, which shares are subject to forfeiture if certain non-revenue-based milestones are not met.
One third
of these shares issued with an assessed fair value of
$4.6 million
were determined to be part of the purchase price. The remaining shares with an assessed fair value of
$10.1 million
were determined to be compensation for post-acquisition service, the cost of which was recognized as contingent compensation expense over a period of
two years
in research and development expense or selling, general and administrative expense.
The Company estimated the fair value of contingent cash consideration using a probability weighted discounted cash flow approach, a Level 3 measurement based on unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and reflect the Company’s own assumptions in measuring fair value. The Company used a discount rate of
21%
in the assessment of the acquisition date fair value for the contingent cash consideration.
The Company allocated
$0.9 million
of the total consideration to tangible assets, net of liabilities, and
$26.9 million
to identified intangible assets, including additional developed technologies of
$23.3 million
, a trade name of
$2.5 million
, and customer relationships of
$1.1 million
, with weighted average useful lives of approximately
nine
,
ten
, and
three years
, respectively. The Company recorded the excess consideration of
$43.6 million
as goodwill.
Summary of Contingent Compensation Expenses
Adjustments related to contingent compensation recorded as a result of all acquisitions consist of the following (in thousands):
Three Months Ended
March 31,
2013
April 1,
2012
Contingent compensation, included in research and development expense
$
489
$
732
Contingent compensation, included in selling, general and administrative expense
2,929
2,360
Total contingent compensation expense
$
3,418
$
3,092
15
Table of Contents
4. Fair Value Measurements
The following table presents the Company’s hierarchy for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of
March 31, 2013
and
December 30, 2012
(in thousands):
March 31, 2013
December 30, 2012
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
Assets:
Money market funds (cash equivalents)
$
280,598
$
—
$
—
$
280,598
$
252,126
$
—
$
—
$
252,126
Debt securities in government-sponsored entities
—
192,162
—
192,162
—
314,873
—
314,873
Corporate debt securities
—
367,473
—
367,473
—
472,861
—
472,861
U.S. Treasury securities
64,753
—
—
64,753
128,489
—
—
128,489
Deferred compensation plan assets
—
15,690
—
15,690
—
13,626
—
13,626
Total assets measured at fair value
$
345,351
$
575,325
$
—
$
920,676
$
380,615
$
801,360
$
—
$
1,181,975
Liabilities:
Acquisition related contingent consideration liabilities
$
—
$
—
$
70,751
$
70,751
$
—
$
—
$
12,519
$
12,519
Deferred compensation liability
—
13,624
—
13,624
—
12,071
—
12,071
Total liabilities measured at fair value
$
—
$
13,624
$
70,751
$
84,375
$
—
$
12,071
$
12,519
$
24,590
The Company holds available-for-sale securities that consist of highly liquid, investment grade debt securities. The Company determines the fair value of its debt security holdings based on pricing from a service provider. The service provider values the securities based on “consensus pricing,” using market prices from a variety of industry-standard independent data providers. Such market prices may be quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 inputs) or pricing determined using inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly (Level 2 inputs), such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, yield curve, volatility factors, credit spreads, default rates, loss severity, current market and contractual prices for the underlying instruments or debt, broker and dealer quotes, as well as other relevant economic measures. The Company’s deferred compensation plan assets consist primarily of mutual funds. The Company performs certain procedures to corroborate the fair value of its holdings, including comparing prices obtained from service providers to prices obtained from other reliable sources.
The Company reassesses the fair value of contingent consideration to be settled in cash related to acquisitions on a quarterly basis using the income approach. This is a Level 3 measurement. Significant assumptions used in the measurement include probabilities of achieving the remaining milestones and the discount rates, which depend on the milestone risk profiles. The changes in the fair value of the contingent considerations during the three months ended March 31, 2013 were due to changes in the estimated payments and a shorter discounting period.
16
Table of Contents
Changes in estimated fair value of contingent consideration liabilities from
December 30, 2012
through
March 31, 2013
are as follows (in thousands):
Contingent
Consideration
Liability
(Level 3 Measurement)
Balance as of December 30, 2012
$
12,519
Additional liability recorded as a result of current period acquisitions
62,144
Change in estimated fair value, recorded in acquisition related expense, net
464
Cash settlements
(4,376
)
Balance as of March 31, 2013
$
70,751
5. Convertible Senior Notes
0.25% Convertible Senior Notes due 2016
In 2011, the Company issued
$920.0 million
aggregate principal amount of
0.25%
convertible senior notes due 2016 (2016 Notes) in an offering conducted in accordance with Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The 2016 Notes were issued at
98.25%
of par value. Debt issuance costs of approximately
$0.4 million
were primarily comprised of legal, accounting, and other professional fees, the majority of which were recorded in other noncurrent assets and are being amortized to interest expense over the
five
-year term of the 2016 Notes.
The 2016 Notes will be convertible into cash, shares of common stock, or a combination of cash and shares of common stock, at the Company’s election, based on an initial conversion rate, subject to adjustment, of
11.9687
shares per
$1,000
principal amount of the 2016 Notes (which represents an initial conversion price of approximately
$83.55
per share), only in the following circumstances and to the following extent:
(1) during the five business-day period after any 10 consecutive trading day period (the “measurement period”) in which the trading price per 2016 Note for each day of such measurement period was less than 98% of the product of the last reported sale price of the Company’s common stock and the conversion rate on each such day; (2) during any calendar quarter (and only during that quarter) after the calendar quarter ending March 31, 2011, if the last reported sale price of the Company’s common stock for 20 or more trading days in the period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the immediately preceding calendar quarter exceeds 130% of the applicable conversion price in effect on the last trading day of the immediately preceding calendar quarter; (3) upon the occurrence of specified events described in the indenture for the 2016 Notes; and (4) at any time on or after December 15, 2015 through the second scheduled trading day immediately preceding the maturity date.
As noted in the indenture for the 2016 Notes, it is the Company’s intent and policy to settle conversions through combination settlement, which essentially involves repayment of an amount of cash equal to the “principal portion” and delivery of the “share amount” in excess of the conversion value over the principal portion in shares of common stock. In general, for each
$1,000
in principal, the “principal portion” of cash upon settlement is defined as the lesser of
$1,000
, and the conversion value during the
20
-day observation period as described in the indenture for the 2016 Notes. The conversion value is the sum of the daily conversion value which is the product of the effective conversion rate divided by
20
days and the daily volume weighted average price (VWAP) of the Company’s common stock. The “share amount” is the cumulative “daily share amount” during the observation period, which is calculated by dividing the daily VWAP into the difference between the daily conversion value (i.e., conversion rate x daily VWAP) and
$1,000
.
The Company pays
0.25%
interest per annum on the principal amount of the 2016 Notes semiannually in arrears in cash on March 15 and September 15 of each year. The 2016 Notes mature on
March 15, 2016
. If a designated event, as defined in the indenture for the 2016 Notes, such as an acquisition, merger, or liquidation, occurs prior to the maturity date, subject to certain limitations, holders of the 2016 Notes may require the Company to repurchase all or a portion of their 2016 Notes for cash at a repurchase price equal to
100%
of the principal amount of the 2016 Notes to be repurchased, plus any accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the repurchase date.
The Company accounts separately for the liability and equity components of the 2016 Notes in accordance with authoritative guidance for convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash upon conversion. The guidance requires the carrying amount of the liability component to be estimated by measuring the fair value of a similar liability that does not have an associated conversion feature. Because the Company has no outstanding non-convertible public debt, the Company determined that senior, unsecured corporate bonds traded on the market represent a similar liability to the convertible senior
17
Table of Contents
notes without the conversion option. Based on market data available for publicly traded, senior, unsecured corporate bonds issued by companies in the same industry and with similar maturity, the Company estimated the implied interest rate of its 2016 Notes to be
4.5%
, assuming no conversion option. Assumptions used in the estimate represent what market participants would use in pricing the liability component, including market interest rates, credit standing, and yield curves, all of which are defined as Level 2 observable inputs. The estimated implied interest rate was applied to the 2016 Notes, which resulted in a fair value of the liability component of
$748.5 million
upon issuance, calculated as the present value of implied future payments based on the
$920.0 million
aggregate principal amount. The
$155.4 million
difference between the cash proceeds of
$903.9 million
and the estimated fair value of the liability component was recorded in additional paid-in capital as the 2016 Notes are not considered currently redeemable at the balance sheet date.
As a policy election under applicable guidance related to the calculation of diluted net income per share, the Company elected the combination settlement method as its stated settlement policy and applied the treasury stock method in the calculation of dilutive impact of the 2016 Notes. During the
three
months ended
March 31, 2013
and
April 1, 2012
, the 2016 Notes were not convertible and therefore not included in the calculation of weighted average shares outstanding. If the 2016 Notes were converted as of
March 31, 2013
, the if-converted value would not exceed the principal amount.
0.625% Convertible Senior Notes due 2014
In 2007, the Company issued
$400.0 million
principal amount of
0.625%
convertible senior notes due 2014 (2014 Notes). The Company pays
0.625%
interest per annum on the principal amount of the 2014 Notes semi-annually in arrears in cash on February 15 and August 15 of each year. The 2014 Notes mature on
February 15, 2014
. The effective interest rate of the liability component was estimated to be
8.3%
.
The Company entered into hedge transactions concurrently with the issuance of the 2014 Notes under which the Company is entitled to purchase up to approximately
18,322,000
shares of the Company’s common stock at a strike price of approximately
$21.83
per share, subject to adjustment. The convertible note hedge transactions had the effect of reducing dilution to the Company’s stockholders upon conversion of the 2014 Notes. Also concurrently with the issuance of the 2014 Notes, the Company sold to the hedge counterparties warrants exercisable, on a cashless basis, for up to approximately
18,322,000
shares of the Company’s common stock at a strike price of
$31.435
per share, subject to adjustment. The proceeds from these warrants partially offset the cost to the Company of the convertible note hedge transactions.
The 2014 Notes became convertible into cash and shares of the Company’s common stock in various prior periods and became convertible again from
April 1, 2012
through, and including,
June 30, 2013
. There were
no
conversions of the 2014 Notes during the
three
months ended
March 31, 2013
and the year ended December 30, 2012. During the year ended January 1, 2012, the principal amount of 2014 Notes converted was repaid with cash and the excess of the conversion value over the principal amount was paid in shares of common stock. The equity dilution resulting from the issuance of common stock related to the conversion of the 2014 Notes was offset by repurchase of the same amount of shares under the convertible note hedge transactions, which were automatically exercised in accordance with their terms at the time of each conversion. The balance of the convertible note hedge transactions with respect to approximately
$40.1 million
principal amount of the 2014 Notes (which are convertible for up to approximately
1,838,000
shares of the Company’s common stock) remained in place as of
March 31, 2013
. The warrants were not affected by the early conversions of the 2014 Notes and, as a result, warrants covering up to approximately
18,322,000
shares of common stock remained outstanding as of
March 31, 2013
. If the remaining 2014 Notes were converted as of
March 31, 2013
, the if-converted value would exceed the principal amount by
$58.3 million
.
18
Table of Contents
The following table summarizes information about the equity and liability components of the 2014 Notes and 2016 Notes (dollars in thousands). The fair values of the respective notes outstanding were measured based on quoted market prices.
March 31, 2013
December 30, 2012
2016 Notes
2014 Notes
2016 Notes
2014 Notes
Principal amount of convertible notes outstanding
$
920,000
$
40,125
$
920,000
$
40,125
Unamortized discount of liability component
(106,259
)
(2,484
)
(114,594
)
(3,158
)
Net carrying amount of liability component
813,741
37,641
805,406
36,967
Less: current portion
—
(37,641
)
—
(36,967
)
Long-term debt
$
813,741
$
—
$
805,406
$
—
Conversion option subject to cash settlement
—
$
2,484
—
$
3,158
Carrying value of equity component, net of debt issuance cost
$
155,366
$
112,143
$
155,366
$
111,470
Fair value of outstanding notes (Level 2 measurement)
$
887,878
$
99,546
$
892,446
$
101,470
Remaining amortization period of discount on the liability component
3.0 years
0.9 years
3.2 years
1.1 years
Contractual coupon interest expense and accretion of discount on the liability component recorded for the convertible senior notes during the
three
months ended
March 31, 2013
and
April 1, 2012
, respectively, were as follows (in thousands):
Three Months Ended
March 31,
2013
April 1,
2012
Contractual coupon interest expense
$
636
$
560
Accretion of discount on the liability component
$
9,009
$
8,599
6. Share-based Compensation Expense
Share-based compensation expense for all stock awards consists of the following (in thousands):
Three Months Ended
March 31,
2013
April 1,
2012
Cost of product revenue
$
1,442
$
1,812
Cost of service and other revenue
154
17
Research and development
8,006
7,427
Selling, general and administrative
14,617
13,773
Share-based compensation expense before taxes
24,219
23,029
Related income tax benefits
(7,565
)
(7,823
)
Share-based compensation expense, net of taxes
$
16,654
$
15,206
19
Table of Contents
The assumptions used for the specified reporting periods and the resulting estimates of weighted average fair value per share of options granted and for stock purchase rights granted under the ESPP for the
three
months ended
March 31, 2013
are as follows:
Stock Options
Employee Stock Purchase Rights
Risk-free interest rate
0.14 - 0.80%
0.11 - 0.15%
Expected volatility
30 - 44%
31
%
Expected term
0.8 - 4.7 years
0.5 - 1.0 year
Expected dividends
—
—
Weighted average fair value per share
$
42.14
$
13.11
As of
March 31, 2013
, approximately
$206.0 million
of unrecognized compensation cost related to stock options, restricted stock, performance stock, and ESPP shares is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately
2.3 years
.
7. Stockholders’ Equity
Stock Options
The Company’s stock option activity under all stock option plans during the
three
months ended
March 31, 2013
is as follows:
Options
(in thousands)
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
per Share
Outstanding as of December 30, 2012
8,351
$
32.10
Granted
451
7.08
Exercised
(301
)
20.86
Cancelled
(56
)
57.90
Outstanding as of March 31, 2013
8,445
$
31.00
At
March 31, 2013
, outstanding options to purchase approximately
6,707,000
shares were exercisable with a weighted average exercise price per share of
$29.41
. Grant activity during the current quarter was primarily attributable to the acquisition of Verinata and the related conversion of stock options to purchase Verinata common stock to stock options to purchase Illumina’s common stock.
Restricted Stock
A summary of the Company’s restricted stock activity and related information for the
three
months ended
March 31, 2013
is as follows:
Restricted
Stock
Weighted Average
Grant-Date Fair
Value per Share
(in thousands)
Outstanding at December 30, 2012
4,125
$
46.43
Awarded
421
50.94
Vested
(444
)
54.15
Cancelled
(96
)
48.93
Outstanding as of March 31, 2013
4,006
$
46.62
20
Table of Contents
Performance Stock Units
The Company issues performance stock units for which the number of shares issuable will range from
50%
and
150%
of the shares approved in the award, based on the Company’s performance relative to specified earnings per share targets at the end of a
three
-year performance period. A summary of the Company’s performance stock unit activity and related information for the
three
months ended
March 31, 2013
is as follows:
Performance
Stock
Weighted Average
Grant-Date Fair
Value per Share
(in thousands)
Outstanding at December 30, 2012
587
$
49.64
Awarded
438
50.33
Cancelled
(20
)
50.54
Outstanding as of March 31, 2013
1,005
$
49.92
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
The price at which common stock is purchased under the ESPP is equal to
85%
of the fair market value of the common stock on the first or last day of the offering period, whichever is lower. During the
three
months ended
March 31, 2013
, approximately
195,000
shares were issued under the ESPP. As of
March 31, 2013
, there were approximately
15,211,000
shares available for issuance under the ESPP.
Warrants
As of
March 31, 2013
, warrants exercisable, on a cashless basis, for up to approximately
18,322,000
shares of common stock were outstanding with an exercise price of
$31.435
. These warrants were sold to counterparties to the Company’s convertible note hedge transactions in connection with the offering of the 2014 Notes, with the proceeds of such warrants used by the Company to partially offset the cost of such hedging transactions. All outstanding warrants expire in equal installments during the
40
consecutive scheduled trading days beginning on May 16, 2014.
Share Repurchases
On April 18, 2012, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a
$250 million
stock repurchase program to be effected via a combination of Rule 10b5-1 and discretionary share repurchase programs. During the
three
months ended
March 31, 2013
, the Company repurchased approximately
489,000
shares for
$25.0 million
.
Stockholder Rights Plan
On January 25, 2012, the Company's Board of Directors declared a dividend of
one
preferred share purchase right (Right) for each outstanding share of the Company's common stock. During the
three
months ended
March 31, 2013
, the expiration date was amended to be
March 27, 2013
and the Rights expired accordingly.
8. Income Taxes
The Company’s effective tax rate may vary from the U.S statutory tax rate due to the change in the mix of earnings in tax jurisdictions with different statutory rates, benefits related to tax credits, and the tax impact of non-deductible expenses and other permanent differences between income before income taxes and taxable income. The effective tax rate for the
three
months ended
March 31, 2013
was
52.5%
. The variance from the U.S. federal statutory rate of
35%
was primarily attributable to the tax treatment of the Syntrix legal contingency, which was recorded as a discrete item during Q1 2013 and is nondeductible for tax purposes until paid. The retroactive reinstatement of the 2012 federal research and development credit as part of the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 that was enacted on January 2, 2013 increased the benefit from income taxes in Q1 2013 by approximately
$2.0 million
.
21
Table of Contents
9. Legal Proceedings
The Company is involved in various lawsuits and claims arising in the ordinary course of business, including actions with respect to intellectual property, employment, and contractual matters. In connection with these matters, the Company assesses, on a regular basis, the probability and range of possible loss based on the developments in these matters. A liability is recorded in the financial statements if it is believed to be probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Because litigation is inherently unpredictable and unfavorable resolutions could occur, assessing contingencies is highly subjective and requires judgments about future events. The Company regularly reviews outstanding legal matters to determine the adequacy of the liabilities accrued and related disclosures. The amount of ultimate loss may differ from these estimates. Each matter presents its own unique circumstances, and prior litigation does not necessarily provide a reliable basis on which to predict the outcome, or range of outcomes, in any individual proceeding. Because of the uncertainties related to the occurrence, amount, and range of loss on any pending litigation or claim, the Company is currently unable to predict their ultimate outcome, and, with respect to any pending litigation or claim where no liability has been accrued, to make a meaningful estimate of the reasonably possible loss or range of loss that could result from an unfavorable outcome. In the event that opposing litigants in outstanding litigations or claims ultimately succeed at trial and any subsequent appeals on their claims, any potential loss or charges in excess of any established accruals, individually or in the aggregate, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations, and/or cash flows in the period in which the unfavorable outcome occurs or becomes probable, and potentially in future periods.
On November 24, 2010, Syntrix Biosystems, Inc. filed suit against the Company in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington at Tacoma (Case No. C10-5870-BHS) alleging that the Company willfully infringed U.S. Patent No. 6,951,682 by selling its BeadChip array products, and that the Company misappropriated Syntrix’s trade secrets. In November and December 2012, the Company filed motions for summary judgment that the patent is not infringed and is invalid, and that Syntrix’s trade secrets claims are barred by various statutes of limitation. Syntrix filed a motion for summary judgment that the patent is valid. On January 30, 2013, the court granted the Company’s motion for summary judgment on Syntrix's trade secret claims, and dismissed those claims from the case. The court denied Syntrix's motion for summary judgment on validity, and denied the Company’s motion for summary judgment for non-infringement and invalidity. On March 14, 2013, a jury reached a verdict in favor of Syntrix, finding that Illumina's BeadChip kits infringe the Syntrix patent, that a reasonable royalty rate is
6%
, and that damages owed to Syntrix for the period from 2005 through September 2012 are approximately
$95.8 million
. During trial, the court dismissed Syntrix’s claim that the alleged infringement was willful. No final judgment has yet been entered. Prior to entry of judgment, additional damages and prejudgment interest will be calculated through the date of the verdict. The Company believes strongly that it did not infringe the Syntrix patent and that the patent is invalid. The Company intends to file a post-trial motion asking the trial court to enter a judgment in its favor as a matter of law or, alternatively, to grant a new trial. Issues also remain to be litigated regarding any future damages to which Syntrix might be entitled and/or injunctive relief. To date, Syntrix has not filed a motion seeking injunctive relief, and the Company believes that such a motion is unlikely to be granted by the trial court. In addition, if the Company’s post-trial motions are unsuccessful, the Company plans to file an appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit challenging the adverse verdict.
As a result of the jury verdict, the Company has recorded a legal contingency accrual of
$106.9 million
as of
March 31, 2013
, which includes the damages awarded to Syntrix, a preliminary estimate of prejudgment interest, and estimated additional damages through March 31, 2013. The accrued damages through the jury verdict date of
$105.9 million
was recorded within operating expenses as a separate line item, and the remainder, representing the royalty amount subsequent to the verdict date, was recorded to cost of sales. In addition, the Company will continue to accrue ongoing royalties on future sales at the royalty rate stated in the jury verdict. The Company may be required to secure the amount of the judgment during the appeals process.
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Our Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A) is provided in addition to the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements and notes to assist readers in understanding our results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows. This MD&A is organized as follows:
•
Business Overview and Outlook
. High level discussion of our operating results and significant known trends that affect our business.
•
Results of Operations
. Detailed discussion of our revenues and expenses.
•
Liquidity and Capital Resources
. Discussion of key aspects of our statements of cash flows, changes in our financial position, and our financial commitments.
22
Table of Contents
•
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
. We have no significant off-balance sheet arrangements.
•
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
. Discussion of significant changes since our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K that we believe are important to understanding the assumptions and judgments underlying our financial statements.
This MD&A discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Please see “Consideration Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” at the end of this MD&A section for additional factors relating to such statements. This MD&A should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included in this report and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 30, 2012
. Operating results are not necessarily indicative of results that may occur in future periods.
Business Overview and Outlook
This overview and outlook provides a high level discussion of our operating results and significant known trends that affect our business. We believe that an understanding of these trends is important to understanding our financial results for the periods being reported herein as well as our future financial performance. This summary is not intended to be exhaustive, nor is it intended to be a substitute for the detailed discussion and analysis provided elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
About Illumina
We are a leading developer, manufacturer, and marketer of life science tools and integrated systems for the analysis of genetic variation and function. Using our proprietary technologies, we provide a comprehensive line of genetic analysis solutions, with products and services that address a broad range of highly interconnected markets, including sequencing, genotyping, gene expression, and genomic-based diagnostics. Our customers include leading genomic research centers, academic institutions, government laboratories, and clinical research organizations, as well as pharmaceutical, biotechnology, agrigenomics, consumer genomics companies, and in vitro fertilization clinics.
Our broad portfolio of instruments, consumables, and analysis tools are designed to simplify and accelerate genetic analysis. This portfolio addresses the full range of genomic complexity, throughput, and price points, enabling researchers to select the best solution for their scientific challenge. These systems can be used to efficiently perform a range of nucleic acid (DNA, RNA) analyses on large numbers of samples. For more focused studies, our array-based solutions provide ideal tools to perform genome-wide association studies (GWAS) involving single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping and copy number variation (CNV) analyses, as well as gene expression profiling and other DNA, RNA, and protein studies.
In 2012 and early 2013, we took steps to support our goal of becoming a leader in genomic-based diagnostics by acquiring Verinata Health, Inc. (Verinata) in February 2013 and BlueGnome Ltd. (BlueGnome) in September 2012. With the Verinata acquisition, we further strengthened our reproductive health diagnostic portfolio by gaining access to Verinata’s verifi® non-invasive prenatal test (NIPT), as well as what we believe to be the most comprehensive intellectual property portfolio in the NIPT industry. BlueGnome is a leading provider of solutions for the screening of genetic abnormalities associated with developmental delay, cancer, and infertility, and BlueGnome’s offerings enhance our ability to establish integrated solutions in reproductive health and cancer. To further enhance our genetic analysis workflows, in 2011 we acquired Epicentre Technologies Corporation (Epicentre), a leading provider of nucleic acid sample preparation reagents and specialty enzymes for sequencing and microarray applications.
Our financial results have been, and will continue to be, impacted by several significant trends, which are described below. While these trends are important to understanding and evaluating our financial results, this discussion should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto in Item 1, Part I of this report, and the other transactions, events, and trends discussed in “Risk Factors” in Item 1A, Part II of this report and Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 30, 2012
.
Funding Environment
The level of global funding for government and academic research remains uncertain. While many of our customers receive funding from government agencies to purchase our products or services, we are lessening our dependency on government funding. In fiscal 2012, approximately 30% of our total revenue came from applied market customers including customers in the clinical, consumer, translational, and agriculture segments who are not reliant on government agencies for funding, and it is our strategy to diversify our customer base to increase further the portion of our revenue from applied market customers over time. However, we estimate that less than one-third of our total revenue is derived, directly or indirectly, from funding provided by the U.S. National Institute of Health (NIH). In fiscal 2012, the NIH budget increased 1% as compared to fiscal 2011 levels. NIH funding from October 1, 2012 to March 31, 2013 was subject to a continuing resolution while funding for the remainder of 2013 is subject to sequester provisions of the Budget Control Act of 2011, which includes a 5% reduction to the NIH budget. We believe that allocations within the NIH budget will continue to favor genetic analysis tools generally and, in particular, research programs that utilize next-generation sequencing.
Next-Generation Sequencing
Next-generation sequencing has become a core technology for modern life science research and is increasingly being used in the applied, molecular diagnostics, and translational markets. Over the next several years, expansion of the sequencing market, including an increase in the number of samples available and enhancements in our product portfolio will continue to drive demand for our next-generation sequencing technologies. Our sequencing instrument installed base continued to expand in Q1 2013. As a result, we believe that our sequencing consumable revenue will continue to grow in future periods.
Our sequencing instrument portfolio primarily includes the HiSeq product family and MiSeq. We began full commercial shipments of our HiSeq 2500 sequencing system in the fourth quarter of 2012. The HiSeq 2500 allows customers to sequence an entire human genome in approximately a day. Our MiSeq sequencing system is a low-cost personal sequencing system that provides individual researchers a desktop-sized platform with rapid turnaround time, high accuracy, and streamlined workflow. We believe our MiSeq systems will continue to be a competitive offering in the lower throughput sequencing market and help us expand our presence in this emerging market segment.
MicroArrays
As a complement to next-generation sequencing, we believe microarrays offer a less expensive, faster, and highly accurate technology for use when genetic content is already known. The information content of microarrays is fixed and reproducible. As such, microarrays provide repeatable, standardized assays for certain subsets of nucleotide bases within the overall genome. As the cost of sequencing continues to decrease, we believe that life science researchers will migrate certain whole genome array studies to sequencing; however, we expect this decline to be offset by demand from customers in applied, consumer, and translational markets.
Financial Overview
Financial highlights for
Q1 2013
include the following:
•
Net revenue
increased
by
21.3%
during
Q1 2013
compared to the same period in 2012. Our sales increased across our portfolio of products, including consumables, instruments, and services, which expanded in Q1 2013 to include revenue from NIPT. We believe our revenue will continue to grow in 2013.
•
Gross profit as a percentage of revenue (gross margin) was
66.3%
for
Q1 2013
, a decrease from
66.4%
for the same period in the prior year. Gross margin decreased in Q1 2013 due in large part to higher amortization of acquired intangible assets. We believe our gross margin in future periods will depend on several factors, including market conditions that may impact our pricing power, sales mix changes among consumable, instrument, and services, product mix changes between established products and new products in new markets, our cost structure for manufacturing operations, royalties, and our ability to create innovative and high premium products that meet or stimulate customer demand.
•
In
Q1 2013
, we incurred a loss from operations of
$45.1 million
compared to income from operations of
$49.6 million
during the same period in 2012. This was a result of higher operating expenses offsetting the increase in gross profit. During the current period, we recorded a
$105.9 million
legal contingency expense in operating expenses associated with the Syntrix patent litigation matter. See note “9. Legal Proceedings” in Part I, Item 1 of this form 10-Q. Additionally, our research and development expenses and selling, general and administrative expenses increased by
$12.6 million
and
$17.1 million
, respectively, from the same period in the prior year as we continue to invest in the growth of our business. We expect operating expenses to continue to grow. The consolidated financial results in Q1 2013 reflect a
$4.0 million
loss incurred by Verinata since the acquisition date.
•
Our effective tax rate was
52.5%
for
Q1 2013
. The variance from the U.S. statutory rate of 35% was primarily attributable to the tax treatment of the Syntrix legal contingency, which was recorded as a discrete item during Q1 2013 and is nondeductible for tax purposes until paid. Our future effective tax rate may vary from the U.S. statutory tax rate due to the mix of earnings in tax jurisdictions with different statutory tax rates and the other factors discussed in the risk factor “We are subject to risks related to taxation in multiple jurisdictions and the possible loss of the tax deduction on our outstanding convertible notes” in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 30, 2012. For the remainder of 2013 and beyond, we anticipate that our effective tax rate will trend lower than the U.S. federal statutory rate as the portion of our earnings subject to lower statutory tax rates increases.
The American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012, which was signed into law on January 2, 2013, included the retroactive reinstatement of the federal research and development credit, from January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2013. Our provision for income taxes for the year ended December 30, 2012 did not include the impact of the federal research credit generated in 2012 since the law was enacted subsequent to our 2012 reporting period. Instead, the retroactive reinstatement of the federal research credit generated in 2012 increased our benefit from income taxes for Q1 2013 by approximately $2.0 million.
•
We ended
Q1 2013
with cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments totaling
$1.07 billion
.
23
Table of Contents
Results of Operations
To enhance comparability, the following table sets forth our unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations for the specified reporting periods stated as a percentage of total revenue.
Q1 2013
Q1 2012
Revenue:
Product revenue
89.5
%
93.7
%
Service and other revenue
10.5
6.3
Total revenue
100.0
100.0
Cost of revenue:
Cost of product revenue
27.2
29.4
Cost of service and other revenue
4.5
3.1
Amortization of acquired intangible assets
2.0
1.1
Total cost of revenue
33.7
33.6
Gross profit
66.3
66.4
Operating expense:
Research and development
18.6
17.9
Selling, general and administrative
25.7
24.9
Legal contingencies
32.0
—
Unsolicited tender offer related expense
2.2
3.0
Acquisition related expense, net
1.2
0.6
Headquarter relocation expense
0.2
0.8
Restructuring charges
—
1.0
Total operating expense
79.9
48.2
Income (loss) from operations
(13.6
)
18.2
Other income (expense):
Cost-method investment gain
1.8
—
Interest income
0.6
0.9
Interest expense
(2.9
)
(3.4
)
Other expense, net
(0.2
)
(1.0
)
Total other expense, net
(0.7
)
(3.4
)
Income (loss) before income taxes
(14.3
)
14.8
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes
(7.5
)
5.2
Net income (loss)
(6.8
)%
9.6
%
Our fiscal year consists of 52 or 53 weeks ending the Sunday closest to December 31, with quarters of 13 or 14 weeks ending the Sunday closest to March 31, June 30, September 30, and December 31. The
three
month periods ended
March 31, 2013
and
April 1, 2012
were both 13 weeks.
Revenue
(Dollars in thousands)
Q1 2013
Q1 2012
Change
Percentage
Change
Product revenue
$
296,170
$
255,636
$
40,534
16
%
Service and other revenue
34,788
17,134
17,654
103
Total revenue
$
330,958
$
272,770
$
58,188
21
%
24
Table of Contents
Product revenue consists primarily of revenue from the sale of consumables and instruments. Service and other revenue consists primarily of instrument service contract revenue as well as sequencing and genotyping service revenue.
Consumables revenue
increased
$32.0 million
, or
19%
, to
$204.9 million
in
Q1 2013
compared to
$172.9 million
in the prior year period. The increase was primarily attributable to increased sales of sequencing consumables, driven by higher consumable sales per HiSeq instrument and the growth in both the HiSeq and MiSeq installed base.
Instrument revenue
increased
$8.5 million
, or
11%
, to
$88.1 million
in
Q1 2013
compared to
$79.6 million
in the prior year period, driven primarily by an increase in HiSeq shipments.
The increase in service and other revenue in
Q1 2013
compared to the prior year period was driven by an increase in both sequencing service revenue, as a result of an increased number of genomes sequenced, and instrument service contract revenue as a result of our growing installed base.
Gross Margin
(Dollars in thousands)
Q1 2013
Q1 2012
Change
Percentage
Change
Gross profit
$
219,292
$
181,011
$
38,281
21
%
Gross margin
66.3
%
66.4
%
Gross profit in
Q1 2013
increased in comparison to the prior year period, primarily due to the increase in revenue. Gross margin decreased in
Q1 2013
due in large part to an increase in amortization of acquired intangible assets and to a lesser degree, lower sales of our higher-margin consumables as a percentage of total sales, the combination of which more than offset the positive impact from operational efficiencies.
Operating Expense
(Dollars in thousands)
Q1 2013
Q1 2012
Change
Percentage
Change
Research and development
$
61,450
$
48,839
$
12,611
26
%
Selling, general and administrative
85,074
67,969
17,105
25
Legal contingencies
105,853
—
105,853
100
Unsolicited tender offer related expense
7,484
8,092
(608
)
(8
)
Acquisition related expense, net
3,821
1,737
2,084
120
Headquarter relocation expense
757
2,140
(1,383
)
(65
)
Restructuring charges
—
2,622
(2,622
)
(100
)
Total operating expense
$
264,439
$
131,399
$
133,040
101
%
Research and development expense increased by
$12.6 million
, or
26%
, in
Q1 2013
from the same period in the prior year, primarily due to increased headcount as we continue to increase our investment in the development of new products as well as enhancements to existing products.
Selling, general and administrative expense increased
$17.1 million
, or
25%
, in
Q1 2013
from the same period in the prior year. The increase is primarily driven by increased headcount to support the growth of our Company.
The increases in research and development expense and selling, general and administrative expense were also partially attributable to recently completed acquisitions.
During Q1 2013, we recorded a
$105.9 million
charge in legal contingency charge within operating expenses as a result of a jury verdict on the Syntrix litigation matter. The amount recorded in operating expenses included the damages awarded to Syntrix and estimated additional damages through March 14, 2013, the jury verdict date. See additional discussions on this matter in Part II of this Form 10-Q, under Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
25
Table of Contents
Acquisition related expense, net
in
Q1 2013
consisted of acquisition transaction costs of $3.4 million and changes in fair value of contingent considerations.
Acquisition related expense, net
in the prior year period consisted of changes in fair value of contingent considerations.
During
Q1 2013
, we recorded
$7.5 million
of expenses incurred in relation to an unsolicited tender offer in Q1 2012. The expenses consisted primarily of legal, advisory, and other professional fees.
We completed the relocation of our headquarters in 2012. During
Q1 2013
, we incurred
$0.8 million
in additional headquarter relocation expense, primarily consisting of accretion expense related to the facility exit obligation recorded upon vacating our former headquarters. Headquarter relocation expense recorded in
Q1 2012
consisted of the accretion expense related to the facility exit obligation, double rent expense during the transition to our new facility, and moving expenses.
In late 2011, we announced restructuring plans to reduce our global workforce and to consolidate certain facilities. As a result of the restructuring effort, we recorded restructuring charges of
$2.6 million
during
Q1 2012
, comprised primarily of severance pay and other employee separation costs.
Other Expense, Net
(Dollars in thousands)
Q1 2013
Q1 2012
Change
Percentage
Change
Cost-method investment related gain
$
6,113
$
—
$
6,113
100
%
Interest income
1,933
2,526
(593
)
(23
)
Interest expense
(9,747
)
(9,202
)
(545
)
6
Other expense, net
(714
)
(2,663
)
1,949
(73
)
Total other expense, net
$
(2,415
)
$
(9,339
)
$
6,924
(74
)%
During
Q1 2013
, the Company recognized a $6.1 million gain as a result of the sale of a cost-method investment.
Interest income primarily consists of realized gains from our investment portfolio. Interest income decreased in
Q1 2013
from the same period in 2012 as a result of a decrease in our investment portfolio balance as well as a decline in market interest rates. Interest expense in
Q1 2013
remained relatively consistent as compared to the same period in 2012, and consisted primarily of accretion of the discount on our convertible senior notes.
Other expense, net
, in
Q1 2013
and
Q1 2012
primarily consisted of foreign exchange losses.
Provision for (Benefit from) Income Taxes
(Dollars in thousands)
Q1 2013
Q1 2012
Change
Percentage
Change
Income (loss) before income taxes
$
(47,562
)
$
40,273
$
(87,835
)
(218
)%
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes
$
(24,975
)
$
14,071
$
(39,046
)
(277
)%
Effective tax rate
52.5
%
34.9
%
Our effective tax rate was
52.5%
for
Q1 2013
. The variance from the U.S. statutory rate of 35% was primarily attributable to the tax treatment of the Syntrix legal contingency, which was recorded as a discrete item during Q1 2013 and is nondeductible for tax purposes until paid. Our future effective tax rate may vary from the U.S. statutory tax rate due to the mix of earnings in tax jurisdictions with different statutory tax rates and the other factors discussed in the risk factor “We are subject to risks related to taxation in multiple jurisdictions and the possible loss of the tax deduction on our outstanding convertible notes” in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 30, 2012. The effective tax rate was
34.9%
for
Q1 2012
, which was slightly lower than the U.S. statutory rate.
26
Table of Contents
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At
March 31, 2013
, we had approximately
$443.1 million
in cash and cash equivalents, a
$9.1 million
increase from last year, due to the factors described in the “Cash Flow Summary” below. Our primary source of liquidity, other than our holdings of cash, cash equivalents and investments, has been cash flows from operations. Our ability to generate cash from operations provides us with the financial flexibility we need to meet operating, investing, and financing needs. Cash and cash equivalents held by our foreign subsidiaries at
March 31, 2013
were approximately
$311.1 million
. It is our intention to indefinitely reinvest all current and future foreign earnings in foreign subsidiaries.
Historically, we have liquidated our short-term investments and/or issued debt and equity securities to finance our business needs as a supplement to cash provided by operating activities. As of
March 31, 2013
, we had
$624.4 million
in short-term investments. Our short-term investments include marketable securities consisting of debt securities in government-sponsored entities, corporate debt securities, and U.S. Treasury notes.
Our primary short-term needs for capital, which are subject to change, include expenditures related to:
•
support of commercialization efforts related to our current and future products, including expansion of our direct sales force and field support resources both in the United States and abroad;
•
acquisitions of equipment and other fixed assets for use in our current and future manufacturing and research and development facilities;
•
repurchases of our outstanding common stock;
•
the continued advancement of research and development efforts;
•
potential strategic acquisitions and investments;
•
potential litigation; and
•
the expansion needs of our facilities, including costs of leasing additional facilities.
In Q1 2013, we acquired Verinata for
$401.1 million
, including
$339.2 million
in cash payments and
$61.1 million
in fair value of contingent cash consideration.
Our Board of Directors has authorized several common stock repurchase programs. In
Q1 2013
, we used
$25.0 million
to repurchase our outstanding shares under these programs. As of
March 31, 2013
, we had authorization from our Board of Directors to repurchase up to an additional
$142.5 million
of our common stock.
We expect that our revenue and the resulting operating income, as well as the status of each of our new product development programs, will significantly impact our cash management decisions.
We anticipate that our current cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments, together with cash provided by operating activities will be sufficient to fund our near term capital and operating needs for at least the next 12 months. Operating needs include the planned costs to operate our business, including amounts required to fund working capital and capital expenditures. Our future capital requirements and the adequacy of our available funds will depend on many factors, including:
•
our ability to successfully commercialize and further develop our technologies and create innovative products in our markets;
•
scientific progress in our research and development programs and the magnitude of those programs;
•
competing technological and market developments; and
•
the need to enter into collaborations with other companies or acquire other companies or technologies to enhance or complement our product and service offerings.
27
Table of Contents
Cash flow summary
(In thousands)
Q1 2013
Q1 2012
Net cash provided by operating activities
$
87,840
$
65,440
Net cash used in investing activities
(65,021
)
(141,870
)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
(13,006
)
33,616
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
(712
)
30
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
$
9,101
$
(42,784
)
Operating Activities
Cash provided by operating activities in
Q1 2013
consisted of net loss of
$22.6 million
plus net adjustments of
$11.6 million
in addition to net changes in operating assets and liabilities of
$98.8 million
. The primary non-cash expenses added back to net loss included share-based compensation of
$24.2 million
, depreciation and amortization expenses related to property and equipment and acquired intangible assets of
$20.5 million
, and the accretion of the debt discount of
$9.0 million
. These non-cash add-backs were partially offset by deferred income taxes of
$36.7 million
and
$5.3 million
in incremental tax benefit related to share-based compensation. The main driver in the change in net operating assets was an increase in accrued legal contingencies due to a patent litigation. Additionally, inventory, accounts payable, and accrued liabilities increased due to increased business activity.
Cash provided by operating activities in
Q1 2012
consisted of net income of
$26.2 million
plus net adjustments of
$40.2 million
offset by net changes in operating assets and liabilities of
$1.0 million
. The primary non-cash expenses added back to net income included share based compensation of
$23.0 million
, depreciation and amortization expenses related to property and equipment and intangible assets of
$15.4 million
, and accretion of the debt discount on our convertible notes totaling
$8.6 million
. These non-cash add-backs were partially offset by the
$9.5 million
incremental tax benefit related to share-based compensation.
Investing Activities
Cash used in investing activities totaled
$65.0 million
for
Q1 2013
. We purchased
$97.5 million
of available-for-sale securities and
$389.5 million
of our available-for-sale securities matured or were sold during the period. We used
$0.5 million
for purchases of intangible assets. We also paid net cash of
$345.1 million
for acquisitions, and invested
$21.4 million
in capital expenditures primarily associated with the purchase of manufacturing and servicing equipment, leasehold improvements, and information technology equipment and systems.
Cash used in investing activities totaled
$141.9 million
for
Q1 2012
. During the period, we purchased
$331.7 million
of available-for-sale securities, and
$210.4 million
of our available-for-sale securities matured or were sold. We used
$13.1 million
for capital expenditures primarily associated with the purchase of manufacturing and servicing equipment, leasehold improvements, and information technology equipment and systems.
Financing Activities
Cash used in financing activities totaled
$13.0 million
for
Q1 2013
. We received
$10.8 million
in proceeds from the issuance of our common stock through the exercise of stock options and warrants and the sale of shares under our employee stock purchase plan and used
$25.0 million
to repurchase our common stock. In addition, we received
$5.3 million
in incremental tax benefit related to share-based compensation.
Cash provided by financing activities totaled
$33.6 million
for
Q1 2012
. We received
$24.1 million
in proceeds from the issuance of our common stock through the exercise of stock options and warrants and sales of shares under our employee stock purchase plan. In addition, we received
$9.5 million
in incremental tax benefit related to share-based compensation.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not participate in any transactions that generate relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities, which would have been established for the
28
Table of Contents
purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. During
Q1 2013
, we were not involved in any “off-balance sheet arrangements” within the meaning of the rules of the SEC.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
In preparing our financial statements, we make estimates, assumptions and judgments that can have a significant impact on our net revenue, operating income (loss) and net income (loss), as well as on the value of certain assets and liabilities on our balance sheet. We believe that the estimates, assumptions and judgments involved in the accounting policies described in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 30, 2012
have the greatest potential impact on our financial statements, so we consider them to be our critical accounting policies and estimates. There were no material changes to our critical accounting policies and estimates during
Q1 2013
.
Consideration Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, such as statements of our plans, strategies, objectives, expectations, intentions, and adequacy of resources. Words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “continue,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” or similar words or phrases, or the negatives of these words, may identify forward-looking statements, but the absence of these words does not necessarily mean that a statement is not forward looking. Examples of forward-looking statements include, among others, statements regarding the integration of our acquired technologies with our existing technology, the commercial launch of new products, the entry into new business segments or markets, and the duration which our existing cash and other resources is expected to fund our operating activities.
Forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties and are based on potentially inaccurate assumptions that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expected or implied by the forward-looking statements. Among the important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in any forward-looking statements include the following:
•
reductions in the funding levels to our primary customers, including as a result of significant uncertainty concerning government and academic research funding worldwide;
•
our ability to develop and commercialize further our sequencing, array, PCR, and consumables technologies and to deploy new sequencing, genotyping, gene expression, and diagnostics products and applications for our technology platforms;
•
our ability to manufacture robust instrumentation and consumables;
•
our expectations and beliefs regarding future conduct and growth of the business;
•
our ability to maintain our revenue and profitability during periods of research funding reduction or uncertainty, adverse economic and business conditions, including as a result of slowing economic growth in the United States or worldwide;
•
the assumptions underlying our Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates, including our estimates regarding stock volatility and other assumptions used to estimate the fair value of share-based compensation; the fair value of goodwill; and expected future amortization of acquired intangible assets;
•
our belief that the investments we hold are not other-than-temporarily impaired;
•
our assessments and estimates that determine our effective tax rate;
•
our belief that our cash and cash equivalents, investments and cash generated from operations will be sufficient to meet our working capital, capital expenditures and other liquidity requirements for at least the next 12 months; and
•
our assessments and beliefs regarding the potential outcome of pending and future legal proceedings and the liability, if any, that Illumina may incur as a result of those proceeding.
The foregoing factors should be considered together with other factors detailed in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including our most recent filings on Forms 10-K and 10-Q, or in information disclosed in public conference calls, the date and time of which are released beforehand. We undertake no obligation, and do not intend, to update these forward-looking statements, to review or confirm analysts’ expectations, or to provide interim reports or updates on the progress of the current financial quarter. Accordingly, you should not unduly rely on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Additionally, our business is subject to various risks, including those described in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 30, 2012
, which we strongly encourage you to review.
29
Table of Contents
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
There were no substantial changes to our market risks in the
three
months ended
March 31, 2013
, when compared to the disclosures in Item 7A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 30, 2012
.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
We design our internal controls to provide reasonable assurance that (1) our transactions are properly authorized; (2) our assets are safeguarded against unauthorized or improper use; and (3) our transactions are properly recorded and reported in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. We also maintain internal controls and procedures to ensure that we comply with applicable laws and our established financial policies.
Based on management’s evaluation (under the supervision and with the participation of our chief executive officer (CEO) and chief financial officer (CFO)), as of the end of the period covered by this report, our CEO and CFO concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)), are effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms, and is accumulated and communicated to management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
During
Q1 2013
, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act) that materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect internal control over financial reporting.
An evaluation was also performed under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, of any change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
Q1 2013
and that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. The evaluation did not identify any such change.
30
Table of Contents
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
We are involved in various lawsuits and claims arising in the ordinary course of business, including actions with respect to intellectual property, employment, and contractual matters. In connection with these matters, we assess, on a regular basis, the probability and range of possible loss based on the developments in these matters. A liability is recorded in the financial statements if it is believed to be probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Because litigation is inherently unpredictable and unfavorable resolutions could occur, assessing contingencies is highly subjective and requires judgments about future events. We regularly review outstanding legal matters to determine the adequacy of the liabilities accrued and related disclosures. The amount of ultimate loss may differ from these estimates. Each matter presents its own unique circumstances, and prior litigation does not necessarily provide a reliable basis on which to predict the outcome, or range of outcomes, in any individual proceeding. Because of the uncertainties related to the occurrence, amount, and range of loss on any pending litigation or claim, we are currently unable to predict their ultimate outcome, and, with respect to any pending litigation or claim where no liability has been accrued, to make a meaningful estimate of the reasonably possible loss or range of loss that could result from an unfavorable outcome. In the event that opposing litigants in outstanding litigations or claims ultimately succeed at trial and any subsequent appeals on their claims, any potential loss or charges in excess of any established accruals, individually or in the aggregate, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and/or cash flows in the period in which the unfavorable outcome occurs or becomes probable, and potentially in future periods.
On November 24, 2010, Syntrix Biosystems, Inc. filed suit against us in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington at Tacoma (Case No. C10-5870-BHS) alleging that we willfully infringed U.S. Patent No. 6,951,682 by selling our BeadChip array products, and that we misappropriated Syntrix’s trade secrets. In November and December 2012, we filed motions for summary judgment that the patent is not infringed and is invalid, and that Syntrix's trade secrets claims are barred by various statutes of limitation. Syntrix filed a motion for summary judgment that the patent is valid. On January 30, 2013, the court granted our motion for summary judgment on Syntrix’s trade secret claims, and dismissed those claims from the case. The court denied Syntrix’s motion for summary judgment on validity, and denied our motion for summary judgment for non-infringement and invalidity. On March 14, 2013, a jury reached a verdict in favor of Syntrix, finding that Illumina's BeadChip kits infringe the Syntrix patent, that a reasonable royalty rate is 6%, and that damages owed to Syntrix for the period from 2005 through September 2012 are approximately $95.8 million. During trial, the court dismissed Syntrix’s claim that the alleged infringement was willful. No final judgment has yet been entered. Prior to entry of judgment, additional damages and prejudgment interest will be calculated through the date of the verdict. We believe strongly that we did not infringe the Syntrix patent and that the patent is invalid. We intend to file a post-trial motion asking the trial court to enter a judgment in our favor as a matter of law or, alternatively, to grant a new trial. Issues also remain to be litigated regarding any future damages to which Syntrix might be entitled and/or injunctive relief. To date, Syntrix has not filed a motion seeking injunctive relief, and we believe that such a motion is unlikely to be granted by the trial court. In addition, if our post-trial motions are unsuccessful, we plan to file an appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit challenging the adverse verdict.
As a result of the jury verdict, we have recorded a legal contingency accrual of
$106.9 million
as of March 31, 2013, which includes the damages awarded to Syntrix, our preliminary estimate of prejudgment interest, and estimated additional damages through March 31, 2013. The accrued damages through the jury verdict date of
$105.9 million
was recorded within operating expenses as a separate line item, and the remainder, representing the royalty amount subsequent to the verdict date, was recorded to cost of sales. In addition, we will continue to accrue ongoing royalties on future sales at the royalty rate stated in the jury verdict. We may be required to secure the amount of the judgment during the appeals process.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Our business is subject to various risks, including those described in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 30, 2012
, which we strongly encourage you to review. There have been no material changes from the risk factors disclosed in Item 1A of our Form 10-K.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities
None during the quarterly period ended
March 31, 2013
.
31
Table of Contents
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
On April 18, 2012, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a $250 million stock repurchase program to be effected via a combination of Rule 10b5-1 and discretionary share repurchase programs. The following table summarizes shares repurchased pursuant to these programs during the quarter ended
March 31, 2013
.
Period
Total Number of
Shares
Purchased (1)
Average Price
Paid per Share
Total Number of
Shares Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced
Programs
Approximate Dollar
Value of Shares
that May Yet Be
Purchased Under
the Programs
December 31, 2012 - January 27, 2013
195,427
$
51.17
195,427
$
157,519,240
January 28, 2013 - February 24, 2013
199,686
50.12
199,686
147,519,321
February 25 - March 31, 2013
93,895
53.25
93,895
142,519,346
Total
489,008
$
51.12
489,008
$
142,519,346
____________
(1)
All shares purchased during the three months ended
March 31, 2013
were made in open-market transactions.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
None.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.
Not applicable.
Item 5. Other Information.
None.
Item 6. Exhibits.
Exhibit Number
Description of Document
31.1
Certification of Jay T. Flatley pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2
Certification of Marc A. Stapley pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1
Certification of Jay T. Flatley pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2
Certification of Marc A. Stapley pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.INS
XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
101.CAL
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
101.LAB
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
101.PRE
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase
101.DEF
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase
32
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Illumina, Inc.
(registrant)
Date:
May 1, 2013
/s/ MARC A. STAPLEY
Marc A. Stapley
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
33