Jack in the Box - 10-Q quarterly report FY

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended April 16, 2006

Commission File Number: 1-9390

JACK IN THE BOX INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


DELAWARE		95-2698708

(State of Incorporation)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)


9330 BALBOA AVENUE, SAN DIEGO, CA		92123

(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (858) 571-2121

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.


Large accelerated filer þ		Accelerated filer o		Non-accelerated filer o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes o No þ

Number of shares of common stock, $.01 par value, outstanding as of the close of business May 11, 2006 - 35,347,106.

JACK IN THE BOX INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

INDEX


	Page
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited):

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets		3

Consolidated Statements of Earnings		4

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows		5

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		6

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		17

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		25

Item 4. Controls and Procedures		25

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings		25

Item 1A. Risk Factors		26

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		26

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders		26

Item 6. Exhibits		27

Signature		29
EXHIBIT 31.1
EXHIBIT 31.2
EXHIBIT 32.1
EXHIBIT 32.2

2

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JACK IN THE BOX INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

(Unaudited)


	April 16,			October 2,
	2006			2005

ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents (includes restricted cash of $45,735 and $45,580, respectively)	$	159,134		$	103,708
Accounts and notes receivable, net		27,200			21,227
Inventories		39,789			40,007
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		23,487			24,945
Deferred income tax asset		38,340			38,340
Assets held for sale and leaseback		42,708			55,743

Total current assets		330,658			283,970


Property and equipment, at cost		1,442,801			1,423,548
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization		575,158			545,563

Property and equipment, net		867,643			877,985

Other assets, net		177,547			176,031

	$	1,375,848		$	1,337,986


LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Current liabilities:
Current maturities of long-term debt	$	7,884		$	7,788
Accounts payable		54,028			56,064
Accrued liabilities		210,466			211,438

Total current liabilities		272,378			275,290


Long-term debt, net of current maturities		285,937			290,213

Other long-term liabilities		158,356			148,251

Deferred income taxes		56,834			58,860

Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock $.01 par value, 15,000,000 authorized, none issued		—			—
Common stock $.01 par value, 75,000,000 authorized, 46,463,528 and 45,391,851 issued, respectively		465			454
Capital in excess of par value		410,818			380,161
Retained earnings		494,025			447,015
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net		(28,506	)		(29,563	)
Unearned compensation		—			(8,233	)
Treasury stock, at cost, 11,196,728 and 9,752,028 shares, respectively		(274,459	)		(224,462	)

Total stockholders’ equity		602,343			565,372

	$	1,375,848		$	1,337,986

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

3

JACK IN THE BOX INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS

(In thousands, except per share data)

(Unaudited)


	Twelve Weeks Ended				Twenty-Eight Weeks Ended
	April 16,		April 17,		April 16,		April 17,
	2006		2005		2006		2005
Revenues:
Restaurant sales	$	487,822	$	477,968	$	1,127,702	$	1,090,108
Distribution and other sales		108,122		73,886		248,083		166,926
Franchise rents and royalties		21,240		16,611		52,143		41,267
Gain on sale of company-operated restaurants and other		9,052		7,536		18,025		15,407

		626,236		576,001		1,445,953		1,313,708


Costs of revenues:
Restaurant costs of sales		151,569		150,355		355,514		343,353
Restaurant operating costs		250,418		245,711		581,566		564,977
Costs of distribution and other sales		107,134		72,963		245,292		165,068
Franchised restaurant costs		9,984		8,189		22,851		18,431

		519,105		477,218		1,205,223		1,091,829


Selling, general and administrative		69,131		64,040		158,681		143,598

Earnings from operations		38,000		34,743		82,049		78,281

Interest expense, net		3,440		2,478		7,430		6,451


Earnings before income taxes		34,560		32,265		74,619		71,830

Income taxes		12,773		11,588		27,609		25,723


Net earnings	$	21,787	$	20,677	$	47,010	$	46,107


Net earnings per share:
Basic	$	.63	$	.57	$	1.35	$	1.28
Diluted	$	.61	$	.55	$	1.31	$	1.23

Weighted-average shares outstanding:
Basic		34,482		36,092		34,766		36,013
Diluted		35,701		37,395		35,921		37,340

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

4

JACK IN THE BOX INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)


	Twenty-Eight Weeks Ended
	April 16,			April 17,
	2006			2005

Cash flows from operating activities:
Net earnings	$	47,010		$	46,107
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		47,198			45,931
Deferred finance cost amortization		599			487
Provision for deferred income taxes		(2,761	)		(216	)
Share-based compensation expense		6,566			1,856
Tax benefits from share-based compensation		(8,045	)		5,408
Pension and post retirement expense		13,327			9,643
Gains on cash surrender value of Company-owned life insurance		(2,015	)		(1,515	)
Gains on the sale of company-operated restaurants		(14,186	)		(12,523	)
Losses on the sale of property and equipment, net		4,480			5,251
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Increase in receivables		(2,194	)		(2,488	)
Decrease (increase) in inventories		218			(6,975	)
Decrease in prepaid expenses and other current assets		4,677			4,173
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable		(2,036	)		9,716
Pension contributions		(7,217	)		(653	)
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities		13,177			(18,124	)

Cash flows provided by operating activities		98,798			86,078


Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchase of property and equipment		(47,636	)		(50,361	)
Proceeds from the sale of property and equipment		702			1,979
Proceeds from the sale of company-operated restaurants		18,784			17,326
Proceeds from (purchase of) assets held for sale and leaseback, net		13,642			(8,747	)
Collections on notes receivable		395			491
Purchase of investments		(5,655	)		(4,690	)
Other		(674	)		(2,710	)

Cash flows used in investing activities		(20,442	)		(46,712	)


Cash flows from financing activities:
Principal payments on debt		(4,180	)		(4,670	)
Debt costs		(260	)		(343	)
Repurchase of common stock		(49,997	)		(64,159	)
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation arrangements		8,045			—
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		23,462			18,768

Cash flows used in financing activities		(22,930	)		(50,404	)

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	$	55,426		$	(11,038	)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

5

JACK IN THE BOX INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

1.		SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

		Nature of operations – Jack in the Box Inc. (the “Company”) operates and franchises Jack in the Box^{^®} quick-service restaurants and Qdoba Mexican Grill^{^®} fast-casual restaurants.

		Basis of presentation and fiscal year – The accompanying consolidated financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). In our opinion, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation of financial condition and results of operations for these interim periods have been included. Operating results for one interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results for any other interim period or for the fiscal year. Certain prior year amounts in the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation, including the reclassification of interest income from other revenues to interest expense, net.

		These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 2, 2005.

		Our fiscal year is 52 or 53 weeks ending the Sunday closest to September 30. Fiscal year 2006 and 2005 include 52 weeks. Our first quarter includes 16 weeks and each remaining quarter includes 12 weeks. All comparisons between 2006 and 2005 refer to the 12-week (“quarter”) and 28-week (“year-to-date”) periods ended April 16, 2006 and April 17, 2005, respectively, unless otherwise indicated.

		References to the Company throughout these notes to the consolidated financial statements are made using the first person notations of “we,” “us” and “our.”

		Estimations – In preparing the consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, management is required to make certain assumptions and estimates that affect reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and the disclosure of contingencies. In making these assumptions and estimates, management may from time to time seek advice from, and consider information provided by, actuaries and other experts in a particular area. Actual amounts could differ materially from these estimates.

		Restricted cash - To reduce our letter of credit fees incurred under the credit facility, we entered into a separate cash-collateralized letter of credit agreement in October 2004. At April 16, 2006, we had letters of credit outstanding under this agreement of $42,526, which were collateralized by approximately $45,735 of cash and cash equivalents. Although we intend to continue this agreement, we have the ability to terminate the cash-collateralized letter of credit agreement thereby eliminating restrictions on the $45,735 restricted cash and cash equivalent balance.

		Company-owned life insurance – We have elected to purchase company-owned life insurance policies. As of April 16, 2006 and October 2, 2005, the cash surrender values of these policies were $49,856 and $43,741, respectively, and are included in other assets, net in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. A portion of these policies reside in an umbrella trust for use only to pay plan benefits to participants, or to pay creditors if the Company becomes insolvent. The cash surrender values of those policies covered under the trust were $23,968 and $22,927 as of April 16, 2006 and October 2, 2005, respectively. The trust also includes cash of $826 and $831 as of April 16, 2006 and October 2, 2005, respectively.

		Share-based compensation – Effective October 3, 2005, we adopted the fair value recognition provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) 123R, Share-Based Payment,which generally requires, among other things, that all employee share-based compensation be measured using a fair value method and that the resulting compensation cost be recognized in the financial statements. The Company selected the modified prospective method of adoption. Under this method, compensation expense that we recognized in 2006 included: (a) all share-based payments granted prior to, but not yet vested as of, October 3, 2005, estimated in accordance with the original provisions of SFAS 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and (b) all share-based payments granted on or after October 3, 2005, estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123R. Results for prior periods have not been restated.

6

JACK IN THE BOX INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

1.		SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

		SFAS 123R requires the Company to estimate forfeitures in calculating the expense relating to share-based compensation as opposed to recognizing forfeitures as they occur. The adjustment to apply estimated forfeitures to previously recognized share-based compensation was considered immaterial and as such was not classified as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle. Furthermore, in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123R, on October 3, 2005, we reclassified the balance in unearned compensation to capital in excess of par value in our consolidated balance sheet.

		SFAS 123R also requires companies to calculate an initial “pool” of excess tax benefits available at the adoption date to absorb any tax deficiencies that may be recognized under SFAS 123R. The pool includes the net excess tax benefits that would have been recognized if the Company had adopted SFAS 123 for recognition purposes on its effective date.

		We have elected to calculate the pool of excess tax benefits under the alternative transition method described in Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Staff Position (“FSP”) FAS 123-3,Transition Election Related to Accounting for Tax Effects of Share-Based Payment Awards, which also specifies the method we must use to calculate excess tax benefits reported on the statement of cash flows. The excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements classified as financing cash flows for the twenty-eight weeks ended April 16, 2006 of $8,045 would not have been materially different if we had not adopted SFAS 123R; however, they would have been classified as operating cash flows rather than as financing cash flows.

		Compensation expense for the Company’s share-based compensation awards are generally recognized on a straight-line basis during the service period of the respective grant. Certain awards continue to vest upon the recipient’s retirement from the Company. In these cases, for awards granted prior to October 2, 2005, the Company will recognize compensation costs over the service period and accelerate any remaining unrecognized compensation when the employee retires. For awards granted after October 2, 2005, the Company will recognize compensation costs over the shorter of the vesting period or the period from the date of grant to the date the employee becomes eligible to retire. For awards granted prior to October 3, 2005, had the Company recognized compensation cost over the shorter of the vesting period or the period from the date of grant to becoming retirement eligible, compensation costs recognized under SFAS 123R would not have been materially different.

		In 2006, we recognized total share-based compensation expense and related tax benefits of $2,747 and $1,016, respectively, in the quarter and $6,567 and $2,430, respectively, year-to-date.

		The following table represents the impact to our fiscal 2006 statements of earnings due to the change in the stock option expensing requirements resulting from our adoption of SFAS 123R:


	Twelve		Twenty-Eight
	Weeks		Weeks
Reduction in earnings from operations	$	1,178	$	3,784
Reduction in earnings before income taxes		1,178		3,784
Reduction in net earnings		742		2,384

Reduction in net earnings per share:
Basic	$	.02	$	.07
Diluted	$	.02	$	.07

7

JACK IN THE BOX INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

1.		SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

		Prior to fiscal year 2006, stock awards were accounted for under Accounting Principles Board Opinion (“APB”) 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, using the intrinsic method, whereby compensation expense is recognized for the excess, if any, of the quoted market price of the Company’s stock at the date of grant over the exercise price. We applied the disclosure provisions of SFAS 123 as if the fair value based method had been applied in measuring compensation expense.

		In 2005, had compensation expense been recognized for our share-based compensation plans by applying the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123, we would have recorded net earnings and earnings per share for the periods ended April 17, 2005 as follows:


	Twelve			Twenty-Eight
	Weeks			Weeks

Net earnings, as reported	$	20,677		$	46,107
Add: Share-based employee compensation expense included in reported net earnings, net of taxes		677			1,181
Deduct: Total share-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of taxes		(1,876	)		(4,189	)

Pro forma net earnings	$	19,478		$	43,099


Net earnings per share:
Basic — as reported	$	.57		$	1.28
Basic — pro forma	$	.54		$	1.20

Diluted — as reported	$	.55		$	1.23
Diluted — pro forma	$	.52		$	1.15

		For the pro forma disclosure, the estimated fair values of options were amortized on a straight line basis over their respective vesting periods of up to five years.

		Gains on sale of company-operated restaurants and other revenues include gains from the sale of company-operated restaurants to franchisees of $7,472 and $14,186, respectively, in 2006 and $6,100 and $12,523, respectively, in 2005, as well as other franchise fees.

		New accounting pronouncements – In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS 151, Inventory Costs.SFAS 151 clarifies the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facilities expense, freight, handling costs and wasted material. SFAS 151 is effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. The adoption of this Statement did not have a material impact on our operating results or financial condition.

		In October 2005, the FASB issued Staff Position 13-1, Accounting for Rental Costs Incurred During a Construction Period (“FSP 13-1”). FSP 13-1 is effective for the first fiscal period beginning after December 15, 2005, and requires that rental costs associated with ground or building operating leases that are incurred during a construction period be recognized as rental expense. The adoption of this Staff Position did not have a material impact on our operating results or financial condition.

2.		CREDIT FACILITY AMENDMENT

		Our credit facility is comprised of: (i) a $200,000 revolving credit facility maturing on January 8, 2008 with an interest rate of London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus 2.25% and (ii) a $269,500 term loan maturing on January 8, 2011, with a rate of LIBOR plus 1.50%. Effective October 6, 2005, we amended our credit agreement to achieve a 25 basis point reduction in the term loan’s applicable margin to expand the categories of investments allowable

8

JACK IN THE BOX INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

2.		CREDIT FACILITY AMENDMENT (continue)

		under the credit agreement, and to provide for an aggregate amount of $200,000 for the acquisition of our common stock or the potential payment of cash dividends. Fees paid in connection with the repricing were customary for such arrangements of this type and were not material.

3.		RETIREMENT PLANS

		Defined Benefit Pension Plans – We have qualified and non-qualified defined benefit pension plans covering those employees meeting certain eligibility requirements. These plans are subject to modification at any time. The plans provide retirement benefits based on years of service and compensation. It is our practice to fund retirement costs as necessary.

		Net Periodic Pension Cost – The components of net periodic pension cost for each period are presented below:


	Twelve Weeks Ended						Twenty-Eight Weeks Ended
	April 16,			April 17,			April 16,			April 17,
	2006			2005			2006			2005

Service cost	$	3,043		$	2,086		$	6,726		$	4,866
Interest cost		3,383			2,791			7,558			6,513
Expected return on plan assets		(2,891	)		(2,178	)		(6,645	)		(5,082	)
Recognized actuarial loss		2,097			940			4,221			2,193
Net amortization		378			303			870			707

Net periodic pension cost	$	6,010		$	3,942		$	12,730		$	9,197

		Future Cash Flows – In 2006, we have contributed $6,000 to our qualified plan and $1,021 to our non-qualified plan. The total qualified and non-qualified plan pension benefits expected to be paid in the remainder of fiscal 2006 are approximately $9,000.

		Postretirement Benefit Plans – We also sponsor health care plans that provide postretirement medical benefits for employees who meet minimum age and service requirements. These plans are contributory, with retiree contributions adjusted annually, and contain other cost-sharing features such as deductibles and coinsurance. Our policy is to fund the cost of medical benefits in amounts determined at the discretion of management.

		Our postretirement health plans provide for prescription drug benefits. The Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (“Act”) was signed into law on December 8, 2003. On May 19, 2004, the FASB issued FSP 106-2, Accounting and Disclosure Requirements Related to the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003, which provides accounting guidance related to the Act. We adopted FSP 106-2 in fiscal year 2004 as required. The effect of the Medicare subsidy reduced service and interest costs, and increased net amortization by $8, $27 and $75, respectively, in the quarter and $18, $64, and $174, respectively, year-to-date.

		Net Periodic Pension Cost – The components of net periodic postretirement benefit cost for each period are presented below:


	Twelve Weeks Ended						Twenty-Eight Weeks Ended
	April 16,			April 17,			April 16,			April 17,
	2006			2005			2006			2005

Service cost	$	63		$	57		$	146		$	133
Interest cost		236			221			551			516
Net amortization		(43	)		(87	)		(100	)		(203	)

Net periodic postretirement benefit cost	$	256		$	191		$	597		$	446

9

JACK IN THE BOX INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

3.		RETIREMENT PLANS (continued)

		Future Cash Flows – In 2006, we have contributed $196 to our postretirement benefit plans. The future benefits expected to be paid and the Medicare subsidy expected to be received are as follows:


	Gross		Act
Fiscal year	Payments		Subsidy

2006	$	485	$	26
2007		562		33
2008		656		41
2009		740		50
2010		829		60
Thereafter		5,366		525

4.		INCOME TAXES

		The income tax provisions reflect tax rates of 37% in 2006 and 35.8% in 2005. The tax rate in 2005 reflects the benefit from the retroactive reinstatement of the Work Opportunity Tax Credit.

5.		STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

		Treasury Stock – Pursuant to a $150,000 stock repurchase program authorized by our Board of Directors in September 2005, the Company repurchased 1,444,700 shares of its common stock for approximately $50,000 during the first quarter of 2006. As of April 16, 2006, we had approximately $100,000 of repurchase availability remaining under this authorization.

		Comprehensive Income – The Company’s total comprehensive income, net of taxes, was as follows:


	Twelve Weeks Ended					Twenty-Eight Weeks Ended
	April 16,		April 17,			April 16,		April 17,
	2006		2005			2006		2005

Net earnings	$	21,787	$	20,677		$	47,010	$	46,107
Net unrealized gain (loss) related to cash flow hedges, net of taxes		817		(614	)		1,057		(614	)

Total comprehensive income	$	22,604	$	20,063		$	48,067	$	45,493

The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of taxes, were as follows:


	April 16,			October 2,
	2006			2005

Additional minimum pension liability adjustment	$	(29,980	)	$	(29,980	)
Net unrealized gain related to cash flow hedges		1,474			417

Accumulated other comprehensive loss	$	(28,506	)	$	(29,563	)

10

JACK IN THE BOX INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

6.		SHARE-BASED EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION

		Stock Incentive Plans – We offer share-based compensation plans to attract, retain, and motivate key officers, non-employee directors, and employees to work toward the financial success of the Company. The Company’s incentive plans are administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors and have been approved by the stockholders of the Company. Effective November 2005, the Amended and Restated 2004 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2004 Plan”) is the only plan under which new awards may be issued. The 2002 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2002 Plan”) was retired in November 2005.

		The 2004 Plan was adopted in February 2004 and amended in February 2005 to increase the share authorization. The 2004 plan provides for the issuance of up to 3,250,000 common shares in connection with the granting of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock purchase rights, restricted stock bonuses, restricted stock units or performance units to key employees and directors. No more than 650,000 shares may be granted under this plan as restricted stock or performance-based awards.

		There are four other plans under which we can no longer issue awards, although awards outstanding under these plans may still vest and be exercised: the 1992 Employee Stock Incentive Plan (the “1992 Plan”); the 1993 Stock Option Plan (the “1993 Plan”); the 2002 Plan; and the Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan (the “Director Plan”).

		In January 1992, we adopted the 1992 Plan, which allowed eligible employees to annually receive stock options, restricted stock and other various share-based awards. Subject to certain adjustments, up to a maximum of 3,775,000 shares of common stock may be sold or issued under the 1992 Plan.

		In August 1993, we adopted the 1993 Plan, which allowed eligible employees who did not receive stock options under the 1992 Plan to receive stock options with an aggregate exercise price equivalent to a percentage of their eligible earnings. Approximately 3,000,000 shares of common stock may be sold or issued under the 1993 Plan.

		In February 2002, we adopted the 2002 Plan, which allowed eligible officers and other key employees to receive stock options and incentive stock awards. Subject to certain adjustments, up to a maximum of 1,900,000 shares of common stock may be sold or issued under the 2002 Plan.

		In February 1995, we adopted the Director Plan, which allowed any eligible non-employee director of the Company to annually receive stock options. The actual number of shares that may be purchased under the option was based on the relationship of a portion of each director’s compensation to the fair market value of the common stock, but was limited to a maximum of 10,000 shares annually. Subject to certain adjustments, up to a maximum of 650,000 shares of common stock may be sold or issued under the Director Plan.

		The terms and conditions of the share-based awards under the plans are determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors on each award date, and may include provisions for the exercise price, expirations, vesting, restriction on sales and forfeitures, as applicable.

		As of April 16, 2006, 2,218,969 shares of common stock were available for future issuance under the Company’s stock incentive plans. We issue new shares to satisfy stock option exercises and other share-based award stock issuances.

		Non-Management Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan – We also maintain a deferred compensation plan for non-management directors under which those who are eligible to receive fees or retainers may choose to defer receipt of their compensation. The amounts deferred are converted into stock equivalents at the current market price of our common stock. For directors who elect to defer, we provide an additional credit equal to 25% of the compensation initially deferred. Upon separation from the Board of Directors, these liabilities are settled in cash based on the number of stock equivalents and by the then current market price of our common stock.

11

JACK IN THE BOX INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

6.		SHARE-BASED EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION (continued)

		Employee Stock Purchase Plan – In February 2006, the stockholders of the Company approved an employee stock purchase plan for all eligible employees to purchase shares of common stock at 95% of the fair market value on the last day of each six-month offering period. Employees may authorize the Company to withhold up to 15% of their base compensation during any offering period, subject to certain limitations. A maximum of 100,000 shares of common stock may be issued under the plan. As of April 16, 2006, no shares have been issued.

		Stock Options – Options granted generally have contractual terms up to 11 years and generally provide for an option exercise price of 100% of the quoted market value of the common stock at the date of grant. Furthermore, our options granted to employees generally vest over a four-year period, or sooner, for employees meeting certain age and years of service thresholds. Options issued to directors vest over a period of six months.

		The following is a summary of stock option activity for the year-to-date period ended April 16, 2006:


						Weighted-
				Weighted-		Average
				Average		Remaining		Aggregate
				Exercise		Contractual		Intrinsic
	Shares			Price		Term (Years)		Value

Options outstanding at October 2, 2005		4,473,700		$	23.56
Granted		72,400			31.38
Exercised		(1,118,427	)		20.97
Forfeited		(106,933	)		22.77
Expired		(9,005	)		20.55

Options outstanding at April 16, 2006		3,311,735			24.64		6.33	$	61,420


Options exercisable at April 16, 2006		2,271,146			23.79		5.52		44,055

Options exercisable and expected to vest at April 16, 2006		3,303,946			24.65		6.33		61,247

Effective in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005, we began utilizing a binomial-based model to determine the fair value of options granted. The fair value of all prior options granted has been estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected volatility of the stock price. The following weighted-average assumptions were used for stock option grants in each year:


	April 16,			April 17,
	2006			2005

Risk-free interest rate		4.01	%		3.73	%
Expected dividends yield		0.00	%		0.00	%
Expected stock price volatility		37.37	%		39.40	%
Expected life of options (in years)		5.92			5.87

		In 2006, the risk-free interest rate was determined by a yield curve of risk-free rates based on published U.S. Treasury spot rates in effect at the time of grant, and has a term equal to the expected life. In 2005, the risk-free rate was based on the grant date rate for zero coupon U.S. Government issues with a remaining term similar to the expected life. The dividend yield assumption is based on the Company’s history and expectations of dividend payouts.

		The expected stock price volatility in 2006 represents an average of the implied volatility and the Company’s long term mean reversion volatility. In 2005, prior to using a binomial-based model, the expected stock price volatility was based on the historical volatility of the Company’s stock for a period approximating the expected life.

		The expected life of the options represents the period of time the options are expected to be outstanding and is based on historical trends.

12

JACK IN THE BOX INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

6.		SHARE-BASED EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION (continued)




		There were no options granted in the second quarter of 2006 or 2005. The weighted-average fair value of options granted was $12.77 in 2006 and $15.21 in 2005. The intrinsic value of stock options is defined as the difference between the current market value and the grant price. In 2006 and 2005, the total intrinsic value of stock options exercised was $22,417 and $6,187, respectively, in the quarter and $24,851 and $15,810, respectively, year-to-date.

		For the quarter and year-to-date periods ended April 16, 2006, we expensed $1,178 and $3,784, respectively, in connection with the Company’s stock option awards. As of April 16, 2006, there was approximately $8,961 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to stock options granted under the Company’s stock incentive plans. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.10 years.

		Performance-Vested Stock Awards – In fiscal 2004, the use of performance-vested awards replaced stock option grants for certain employees. Performance awards represent a right to receive a certain number of shares of common stock upon satisfaction of performance goals at the end of a three-year period. The expected cost of the shares is being reflected over the performance period and is based on the fair value of the Company’s stock on the date of grant, reduced for estimated forfeitures. The following is a summary of performance-vested award activity for the year-to-date period ended April 16, 2006:


				Weighted-
				Average Grant
	Shares			Date Fair Value

Performance-vested awards outstanding at October 2, 2005		156,371		$	32.36
Forfeited		(7,797	)		32.17

Performance-vested awards outstanding at April 16, 2006		148,574			32.37


Vested at April 16, 2006		622			29.91

		In 2006 and 2005, the expense recognized in connection with these awards was $342 and $319, respectively, in the quarter and $674 and $627, respectively, year-to-date. As of April 16, 2006, there was approximately $3,429 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to performance-vested stock awards. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.89 years. In 2005, no performance-vested awards were granted and no common stock was issued in connection with these awards.

		Nonvested Stock Awards – During fiscal year 2003, the Company established share ownership guidelines for certain executives. To assist management in meeting these guidelines, in fiscal 2003, we began awarding shares of nonvested stock to certain executives. These nonvested stock awards vest upon retirement or termination based upon years of service as provided in the award agreement. These awards have been recognized as capital in excess of par value in stockholders’ equity based upon the fair value of the Company’s common stock on the award date. Capital in excess of par value is amortized to compensation expense over the estimated vesting period.

		The following is a summary of nonvested stock activity for the quarter ended April 16, 2006:


				Weighted-
				Average Grant
	Shares			Date Fair Value

Nonvested stock outstanding at October 2, 2005		345,470		$	23.72
Issued		(8,250	)		20.95
Forfeited		(46,750	)		20.95

Nonvested stock outstanding at April 16, 2006		290,470			24.24


Vested at April 16, 2006		56,280			20.21

In 2006 and 2005, expense recognized in connection with these nonvested awards was $180 and $140, respectively, in the quarter and $420 and $287, respectively, year-to-date. As of April 16, 2006, there was approximately $5,157 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested stock awards, which are expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 6.60 years. In 2006, the total fair value of shares issued was $288. In 2005, no shares of nonvested stock were granted or issued.

13

JACK IN THE BOX INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

6.		SHARE-BASED EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION (continued)

		Non-Management Directors’ Deferred Compensation – Under our deferred compensation plan for non-management directors, our liability is adjusted at the end of each reporting period to reflect the value of the directors’ stock equivalents at the then market price of our common stock. In 2006 and 2005, the amount deferred and the stock appreciation on the deferred compensation recognized was $1,046 and $604, respectively, in the quarter and $1,688 and $942, respectively, year-to-date. Cash used to settle directors’ compensation upon a director’s retirement from the Board in the quarter ending April 16, 2006 was $1,067.

		The following is a summary of the stock equivalent activity for the year-to-date period ended April 16, 2006:


				Weighted-
	Stocks			Average Grant
	Equivalents			Date Fair Value

Stock equivalents outstanding at October 2, 2005		123,083		$	18.22
Deferred directors’ compensation		8,265			42.57
Cash distribution		(27,410	)		38.92

Stock equivalents outstanding at April 16, 2006		103,938			20.79

7. AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING

The following table reconciles basic weighted-average shares outstanding to diluted weighted-average shares outstanding (in thousands):


	Twelve Weeks Ended				Twenty-Eight Weeks Ended
	April 16,		April 17,		April 16,		April 17,
	2006		2005		2006		2005

Weighted-average shares outstanding – basic		34,482		36,092		34,766		36,013
Assumed additional shares issued upon exercise of stock options, net of shares reacquired at the average market price		1,139		1,149		1,099		1,179
Assumed vesting of nonvested stock, net of shares reacquired at the average market price		80		154		56		148

Weighted-average shares outstanding – diluted		35,701		37,395		35,921		37,340


Stock options excluded (1)		325		—		329		—
Performance based awards excluded (2)		148		89		148		89


(1)		Excluded from diluted weighted-average shares outstanding because their exercise prices, unamortized compensation and tax benefits exceeded the average market price of common stock for the period.

(2)		Excluded from diluted weighted-average shares outstanding because the number of shares issued is contingent on performance achieved against metrics established for the performance period.

8.		COMMITMENTS, CONTINGENCIES AND LEGAL MATTERS

		Commitments – We are principally liable for lease obligations on various properties sub-leased to third parties. We are also obligated under a lease guarantee agreement associated with a Chi-Chi’s restaurant property. Due to the bankruptcy of the Chi-Chi’s restaurant chain, previously owned by the Company, we are obligated to perform in accordance with the terms of a guarantee agreement, as well as four other lease agreements which expire at various dates in 2010 and 2011. During fiscal year 2003, we established an accrual for these lease obligations and do not anticipate incurring any additional charges in future years related to Chi-Chi’s bankruptcy. As of April 16, 2006, our accrual for the lease guarantee was $998 and the maximum potential amount of future payments was $1,675.

14

JACK IN THE BOX INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

8.		COMMITMENTS, CONTINGENCIES AND LEGAL MATTERS (continued)

		Legal Proceedings – During the first quarter of fiscal year 2006, we recorded a $2,400 charge for a legal settlement related to a labor matter in California.

		We are also subject to normal and routine litigation. In the opinion of management, based in part on the advice of legal counsel, the ultimate liability from all other pending legal proceedings, asserted legal claims and known potential legal claims should not materially affect our operating results, financial position and liquidity.

9.		SEGMENT REPORTING

		The Company operates its business in two operating segments, Jack in theBox and Qdoba Mexican Grill (“Qdoba”), based on the Company’s management structure and internal method of reporting. Based upon certain quantitative thresholds, only Jack inthe Box is considered a reportable segment.

		Summarized financial information concerning our reportable segment is shown in the following table:


	Twelve Weeks Ended				Twenty-Eight Weeks Ended
	April 16,		April 17,		April 16,		April 17,
	2006		2005		2006		2005

Jack in the Box revenues	$	609,624	$	563,102	$	1,409,218	$	1,286,070
Jack in the Box earnings from operations		36,192		34,053		78,283		77,376

Interest expense and income taxes are not reported on an operating segment basis in accordance with the Company’s method of internal reporting.

A reconciliation of reportable segment revenues to consolidated revenues follows:


	Twelve Weeks Ended				Twenty-Eight Weeks Ended
	April 16,		April 17,		April 16,		April 17,
	2006		2005		2006		2005

Jack in the Box revenues.	$	609,624	$	563,102	$	1,409,218	$	1,286,070
Qdoba revenues		16,612		12,899		36,735		27,638

Consolidated revenues	$	626,236	$	576,001	$	1,445,953	$	1,313,708

A reconciliation of reportable segment earnings from operations to consolidated earnings from operations follows:


	Twelve Weeks Ended				Twenty-Eight Weeks Ended
	April 16,		April 17,		April 16,		April 17,
	2006		2005		2006		2005

Jack in the Box earnings from operations	$	36,192	$	34,053	$	78,283	$	77,376
Qdoba earnings from operations		1,808		690		3,766		905

Consolidated earnings from operations	$	38,000	$	34,743	$	82,049	$	78,281

10. SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION


	Twenty-Eight Weeks Ended
	April 16,		April 17,
	2006		2005

Cash paid during the year for:
Interest, net of amounts capitalized	$	11,241	$	7,916
Income tax payments		26,996		31,884
Capital lease obligations incurred		—		431
Restricted stock issued		—		626

15

JACK IN THE BOX INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

11.		RESTAURANT CLOSING, IMPAIRMENT CHARGES AND OTHER

		In 2006 and 2005, we recorded immaterial impairment charges related to the closure of certain company-operated restaurants. Total accrued restaurant closing costs, included in accrued expenses and other long-term liabilities, were $5,215 and $5,495 as of April 16, 2006 as of October 2, 2005, respectively. In 2006, lease exit costs of $139 resulting from revisions to certain sublease assumptions were charged to operations and cash payments of $419 were applied against the restaurant closing costs accrual.

12.		SUBSEQUENT EVENT

		Interest rate swaps – We are exposed to interest rate volatility with regard to existing variable rate debt. To reduce our exposure to rising interest rates, on April 24, 2006, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement that will effectively convert $60,000 of our variable rate term loan borrowings to a fixed rate basis beginning March 2008, concurrent with the end of our existing $60,000 interest rate swap, through April 2010. This agreement has been designated as cash flow hedge under the terms of SFAS 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, with effectiveness assessed based on changes in the present value of interest payments on the term loan.

13.		NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

		In March 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Interpretation No. 47, Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations—an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 143 (“FIN 47”). FIN 47 clarifies the term conditional asset retirement obligation and requires a liability to be recorded if the fair value of the obligation can be reasonably estimated. The types of asset retirement obligations that are covered by FIN 47 are those for which an entity has a legal obligation to perform an asset retirement activity; however, the timing and/or method of settling the obligation are contingent on a future event that may or may not be within the control of the entity. FIN 47 also clarifies when an entity would have sufficient information to reasonably estimate the fair value of an asset retirement obligation. FIN 47 is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2005. We expect the adoption of FIN 47 will not have a material impact on our operating results or financial condition.

		On June 1, 2005 the FASB issued SFAS 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections, which replaces APB 20, Accounting Changes, and SFAS 3, Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements. SFAS 154 applies to all voluntary changes in accounting principle, and changes the requirements of accounting for and reporting of a change in accounting principle. SFAS 154 requires retrospective application to prior periods’ financial statements of a voluntary change in accounting principle unless it is impractical. APB 20 previously required that most voluntary changes in accounting principle be recognized by including in net income of the period of the change the cumulative effect of changing to the new accounting principle. SFAS 154 is effective for accounting changes made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. Earlier application is permitted for accounting changes made in fiscal years beginning after June 1, 2005. We expect the adoption of this standard will not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

16

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Results of Operations

All comparisons under this heading between 2006 and 2005 refer to the 12-week (“quarter”) and 28-week (“year-to-date”) periods ended April 16, 2006 and April 17, 2005, respectively, unless otherwise indicated.

Overview

Jack in the Box Inc. (the “Company”) owns, operates and franchises Jack inthe Box^® quick-service restaurants and Qdoba Mexican Grill (“Qdoba”) fast-casual restaurants, primarily in the western and southern United States. As of April 16, 2006, the Company owned, operated and franchised 2,055 Jack in the Boxquick-service restaurants and 285 Qdoba fast-casual restaurants.

The Company’s primary source of revenue is from company-operated restaurants. The Company also derives revenue from distribution sales to Jack in the Box and Qdoba franchisees, retail sales from fuel and convenience stores (“Quick Stuff^®”),royalties from franchised restaurants, rents from real estate leased to certain franchisees, and initial franchise fees and development fees. The Company also recognized gains from the sale of company-operated restaurants to franchisees.

The quick-serve restaurant industry has remained complex and challenging in recent years. Challenges presently facing the sector include higher levels of consumer expectations, intense competition with respect to market share, restaurant locations, labor, menu and product development, the emergence of the fast-casual restaurant segment, changes in the economy and trends for healthier eating.

To address these challenges and others, and to support our goal of becoming a national restaurant company, management has developed a strategic plan focused on three key initiatives. The first initiative is a holistic reinvention of the Jack in the Boxbrand through menu innovation, upgrading guest service and re-imaging Jack in theBox restaurant facilities to reflect the personality of Jack – the chain’s fictional founder and popular spokesman. The second initiative is a multifaceted growth strategy that includes opening new locations and improving the unit economics of each concept. The third strategic initiative is to expand franchising – through new restaurant development and the sale of company restaurants to existing franchisees – to generate higher returns and higher margins, while mitigating business-cost and investment risks.

The following summarizes the most significant events occurring in fiscal year 2006:

	•		Restaurant Sales. Contributing to strong sales growth at Jack inthe Box restaurants were new product introductions, strong customer response to marketing messages promoting the chain’s premium products and value menu, general economic improvement in the retail sector and favorable weather in many of the Company’s major markets in the first quarter of the year. In fiscal 2006, this positive sales momentum resulted in an increase in sales at restaurants open more than one year (“same-store sales”) of 4.9% at Jack in theBox company-operated restaurants and 6.8% at Qdoba system restaurants. In fiscal 2006, we project same-store sales at Jack in the Boxcompany restaurants to increase 3.5% to 4.5% and 5.0% to 7.0% at Qdoba restaurants.

	•		Improved Service. We hosted a breakthrough three-day conference for all Jack in the Box company and franchise restaurant managers to engage them in the service vision and provide them tools for improving guest service at their restaurants.

	•		New Restaurant Designs. As planned in the second quarter, the Company expanded its new interior and exterior design test for its Jack in the Box restaurants to include an entire market in Waco, Texas. The comprehensive design enhancements are intended to promote more in-restaurant dining by creating an inviting atmosphere that reflects the personality of Jack.

	•		Repurchase of Common Stock. Pursuant to a stock repurchase program authorized by our Board of Directors, the Company repurchased approximately 1.4 million shares of its common stock in the first quarter for approximately $50 million.

17

The following table sets forth, unless otherwise indicated, the percentage relationship to total revenues of certain items included in the Company’s consolidated statements of earnings.

STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS DATA


	Twelve Weeks Ended						Twenty-Eight Weeks Ended
	April 16,			April 17,			April 16,			April 17,
	2006			2005			2006			2005
Revenues:
Restaurant sales		77.9	%		83.0	%		78.0	%		83.0	%
Distribution and other sales		17.3			12.8			17.2			12.7
Franchise rents and royalties		3.4			2.9			3.6			3.1
Gain on sale of company-operated restaurants and other		1.4			1.3			1.2			1.2

Total revenues		100.0			100.0			100.0			100.0

Costs of revenues:
Restaurant costs of sales (1)		31.1			31.5			31.5			31.5
Restaurant operating costs (1)		51.3			51.4			51.6			51.8
Costs of distribution and other sales (1)		99.1			98.8			98.8			98.9
Franchise restaurant costs (1)		47.0			49.3			43.8			44.7
Total costs of revenues		82.9			82.9			83.4			83.1
Selling, general and administrative		11.0			11.1			11.0			10.9
Earnings from operations		6.1			6.0			5.7			6.0


(1)		As a percentage of the related sales and/or revenues.

Effective October 3, 2005, we adopted the fair value recognition provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) 123R, Share-Based Payment, which generally requires, among other things, that all employee share-based compensation be measured using a fair value method and that the resulting compensation cost be recognized in the financial statements. The Company selected the modified prospective method of adoption. Under this method, compensation expense that we recognized in 2006 included: (a) compensation expense for all share-based payments granted prior to, but not yet vested as of, October 3, 2005, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the original provisions of SFAS 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and (b) compensation expense for all share-based payments granted on or after October 3, 2005, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123R. Results for prior periods have not been restated. The following tables summarize the impact of adopting SFAS 123R in 2006.


										Impact of Q2 2006
	2^nd Quarter									Option Expense
	2006		2005		$ Change		% Change			$ Amount		% Change

Total revenues	$	626,236	$	576,001	$	50,235		8.7	%	$	—		—	%
Costs of revenues		519,105		477,218		41,887		8.8			—		—
Selling, general and administrative		69,131		64,040		5,091		7.9			1,178		1.8
Earnings from operations		38,000		34,743		3,257		9.4			1,178		3.4
Net earnings		21,787		20,677		1,110		5.4			742		3.6
Basic net earnings per share	$	.63	$	.57	$	.06		10.5		$	.02		3.5
Diluted net earnings per share	$	.61	$	.55	$	.06		10.9		$	.02		3.6


										Impact of YTD 2006
	Year-to-Date									Option Expense
	2006		2005		$ Change		% Change			$ Amount		% Change

Total revenues	$	1,445,953	$	1,313,708	$	132,245		10.1	%	$	—		—	%
Costs of revenues		1,205,223		1,091,829		113,394		10.4			—		—
Selling, general and administrative		158,681		143,598		15,083		10.5			3,784		2.6
Earnings from operations		82,049		78,281		3,768		4.8			3,784		4.8
Net earnings		47,010		46,107		903		2.0			2,384		5.2
Basic net earnings per share	$	1.35	$	1.28	$	.07		5.5		$	.07		5.5
Diluted net earnings per share	$	1.31	$	1.23	$	.08		6.5		$	.07		5.7

18

The following table summarizes the number of systemwide restaurants:

SYSTEMWIDE RESTAURANT UNITS


	April 16,		October 2,		April 17,
	2006		2005		2005

Jack in theBox:
Company-operated		1,509		1,534		1,545
Franchised		546		515		479

Total system		2,055		2,049		2,024


Qdoba:
Company-operated		63		57		51
Franchised		222		193		164

Total system		285		250		215


Consolidated:
Company-operated		1,572		1,591		1,596
Franchised		768		708		643

Total system		2,340		2,299		2,239

Revenues

Restaurant sales increased $9.9 million and $37.6 million, respectively, to $487.8 million and $1,127.7 million in 2006 from $478.0 million and $1,090.1 million in 2005. This growth primarily reflects an increase in per store average (“PSA”) sales at Jack in theBox and Qdoba company-operated restaurants, partially offset by a decrease in the number of Jack in the Box company-operated restaurants. Same-store sales at Jack in the Box company-operated restaurants increased 4.0% in the quarter and 4.9% year-to-date compared with a year ago, with an increase in both average check and transactions. This increase is primarily due to the success of new product introductions, positive customer response to marketing messages promoting our premium and value menu, general economic improvement and favorable weather conditions in many of our major markets during the first quarter of the year.

Distribution and other sales, representing distribution sales to Jack in the Box and Qdoba franchisees, as well as Quick Stuff fuel and convenience store sales, increased $34.2 million and $81.2 million, respectively, to $108.1 million and $248.1 million in 2006 compared with 2005. Sales from our Quick Stuff locations increased due primarily to an increase in the number of locations to 47 at the end of the quarter from 35 a year ago, as well as higher retail prices per gallon of fuel. Distribution sales grew primarily due to an increase in the number of Jack in the Box and Qdoba franchised restaurants serviced by our distribution centers.

Franchise rents and royalties increased $4.6 million and $10.9 million, respectively, to $21.2 million and $52.1 million in 2006 compared with 2005, due primarily to an increase in the number of franchised restaurants. The number of franchised restaurants at the end of the quarter grew to 768 from 643 a year ago, primarily reflecting the franchising of company-operated restaurants and new restaurant development by franchisees.

Other revenues, principally gains and fees from the sale of company-operated restaurants to franchisees, increased to $9.1 million and $18.0 million, respectively, in 2006 from $7.5 million and $15.4 million in 2005, reflecting the sale of 13 and 30 Jack in the Boxrestaurants to franchisees compared with 13 and 26 restaurants a year ago. We continued our strategy of selectively selling Jack in the Box company-operated restaurants to franchisees with the goal of improving operating margins and accelerating cash flows, which enables us to develop new restaurants, reinvest in our restaurant re-image program and repurchase the Company’s common stock without incurring additional debt or diluting equity. In fiscal 2006, we expect other revenues to be approximately $32-34 million, primarily from the sale of 55-60 restaurants.

Costs and Expenses

Restaurant costs of sales, which include food and packaging costs, increased to $151.6 million and $355.5 million, respectively, in 2006 from $150.4 million and $343.4 million in 2005, primarily due to sales growth. As a percentage of restaurant sales, restaurant costs of sales were 31.1% and 31.5% of sales, respectively, in 2006 compared with 31.5% in both periods of 2005. In the quarter, favorable product mix changes and lower commodity costs,

19

principally pork, cheese and beef, contributed to the lower rate. Year-to-date, lower ingredient costs were offset by higher packaging costs and the promotion of our premium products and value menu, which have proportionately higher food costs but yield favorable profits. In fiscal 2005, beef costs were unfavorably impacted by the closing of the U.S. border to Canadian cattle.

Restaurant operating costs increased to $250.4 million and $581.6 million, respectively, in 2006. As a percentage of restaurant sales, operating costs improved to 51.3% and 51.6% of sales, respectively, in 2006 from 51.4% and 51.8% in 2005. The percentage improvement in 2006 is primarily due to fixed cost leverage on same-store sales growth and improved labor management, offset in part by higher costs for utilities. Furthermore, the second quarter of 2005 included a non-recurring expense associated with an arbitration award in connection with the cancellation of a utility contract.

Costs of distribution and other sales increased to $107.1 million and $245.3 million, respectively, in 2006 from $73.0 million and $165.1 million in 2005, primarily reflecting an increase in the related sales. As a percent of the related sales, these costs have increased in the quarter and decreased slightly year-to-date. In the quarter, the percentage increase is primarily attributable to higher distribution delivery costs compared with 2005. Year-to-date, these costs have decreased as a percentage of the related sales due primarily to the fixed cost leverage provided by higher retail prices per gallon of fuel.

Franchise restaurant costs, principally rents and depreciation on properties leased to Jack in the Box franchisees, increased to $10.0 million and $22.9 million, respectively, in 2006 from $8.2 million and $18.4 million in 2005, due primarily to an increase in the number of franchised restaurants. As a percentage of franchise rents and royalties, franchise restaurant costs decreased to 47.0% and 43.8%, respectively, in 2006 compared with 49.3% and 44.7%, respectively, in 2005. The percentage decrease in 2006 is primarily due to the leverage provided by higher royalties.

Selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) increased to $69.1 million and $158.7 million, respectively, in 2006 from $64.0 million and $143.6 million in 2005. As a percentage of revenues, SG&A expenses remained fairly consistent at 11.0% in both periods of 2006 compared with 11.1% and 10.9%, respectively, in 2005. In 2006, the leverage provided from higher revenues was offset by the inclusion of stock option expense of $1.2 million in the quarter and $3.8 million year-to-date, higher pension costs and a $2.4 million charge in the first quarter for a legal settlement related to a labor matter in California.

Interest expense, net was $3.4 million and $7.4 million, respectively, in 2006 compared with $2.5 million and $6.5 million in 2005. Interest income was $1.2 million and $2.9 million, respectively, in 2006 compared with $1.0 million and $1.9 million in 2005, reflecting higher interest rates on invested cash. The increase in interest income was offset by an increase in the average interest rates incurred on Company’s credit facility compared with a year ago.

The income tax provisions reflect year-to-date tax rates of 37.0% in 2006 and 35.8% in 2005. The lower tax rate in 2005 relates primarily to the retroactive reinstatement of the Work Opportunity Tax Credit. We expect the annual tax rate for fiscal year 2006 to be 37.0% — 37.5%. The final annual tax rate cannot be determined until the end of the fiscal year; therefore, the actual rate could differ from our current estimates.

Net Earnings

Net earnings were $21.8 million in the quarter, or $0.61 per diluted share, in 2006 compared to $20.7 million, or $0.55 per diluted share, in 2005. Year-to-date net earnings were $47.0 million, or $1.31 per diluted share, in 2006 compared to $46.1 million, or $1.23 per diluted share, in 2005. Qdoba was accretive to earnings as anticipated.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

General. Cash and cash equivalents increased $55.4 million to $159.1 million at April 16, 2006 from $103.7 million at the beginning of the fiscal year due primarily to cash flows provided by operating activities and proceeds from assets held for sale and leaseback, which offset the Company’s stock repurchase program. We generally reinvest available cash flows from operations to develop new or enhance existing restaurants and to repurchase shares of our common stock.

Financial Condition. The Company, and the restaurant industry in general, maintain relatively low levels of accounts receivable and inventories, and vendors grant trade credit for purchases such as food and supplies. We also continually invest in our business through the addition of new units and refurbishment of existing units, which are reflected as long-term assets and not as part of working capital.

20

Credit Facility. Our credit facility is comprised of (i) a $200 million revolving credit facility maturing on January 8, 2008 with an interest rate of London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus 2.25% and (ii) a $269.5 million term loan maturing on January 8, 2011 with a rate of LIBOR plus 1.50%. The credit facility requires the payment of an annual commitment fee based on the unused portion of the credit facility. The annual commitment rate and the credit facility’s interest rates are based on a financial leverage ratio, as defined in the credit agreement. The Company and certain of its subsidiaries granted liens in substantially all personal property assets to secure our respective obligations under the credit facility. Under certain circumstances, the Company and each of its certain subsidiaries may be required to grant liens in certain real property assets to secure their respective obligations under the credit facility. Additionally, certain of our real and personal property secure other indebtedness of the Company. At April 16, 2006, we had no borrowings under our revolving credit facility and had letters of credit outstanding against our credit facility of $0.3 million.

Effective October 6, 2005, we amended our credit facility to achieve a 25 basis points reduction in the term loan’s applicable margin, to expand the categories of investments allowable under the credit agreement, and to provide for an aggregate amount of $200 million for the acquisition of our common stock or the potential payment of cash dividends. Fees paid in connection with the repricing were customary for such arrangements of this type and were not material.

Letter of Credit Agreement — To reduce the Company’s letter of credit fees, the Company entered into a separate cash-collateralized letter of credit agreement in October 2004. At April 16, 2006, the Company had letters of credit outstanding under this agreement of $42.5 million, which were collateralized by approximately $45.7 million of cash and cash equivalents. Although the Company intends to continue this arrangement, it has the ability to terminate the cash-collateralized letter of credit agreement thereby eliminating restrictions on the $45.7 million cash and cash equivalent balance.

Interest Rate Swaps — To reduce the Company’s exposure to rising interest rates, in March 2005, the Company entered into two interest rate swap agreements that effectively converted $130 million of its variable rate term loan borrowings to a fixed rate basis through March 2008. The agreements have been designated as cash flow hedges under the terms of SFAS 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. Accordingly, changes in the fair value of the interest rate swap contracts are recorded, net of taxes, as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of April 16, 2006. These agreements effectively convert a portion of the Company’s variable rate bank debt to fixed rate debt and have an average pay rate of 4.28%, yielding a fixed rate of 5.78% including the term loan’s 1.50% applicable margin.

Subsequent to April 16, 2006, to further reduce our exposure, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement that will effectively convert $60,000 of our variable rate term loan borrowings to a fixed rate basis beginning March 2008, concurrent with the end our existing $60,000 interest rate swap, through April 2010. This agreement has also been designated as a cash flow hedge under the terms of SFAS 133, with effectiveness assessed based on changes in the present value of interest payments on the term loan.

We are subject to a number of covenants under our various debt instruments, including limitations on additional borrowings, acquisitions, loans to franchisees, capital expenditures, lease commitments and dividend payments, as well as requirements to maintain certain financial ratios, cash flows and net worth. As of April 16, 2006, we were in compliance with all debt covenants.

Total debt outstanding decreased to $293.8 million at April 16, 2006 from $298.0 million at the beginning of the fiscal year, due to scheduled debt repayments made during the year, including payments made on capital leases.

Sale of Company-Operated Restaurants. We have continued our strategy of selectively franchising Jack in the Box company-operated restaurants, selling 13 and 30 restaurants, respectively, in 2006 compared with 13 and 26 in 2005. Year-to-date proceeds from the sale of company-operated restaurants were $18.8 million in 2006 and $17.3 million in 2005.

Common Stock Repurchase Program. Pursuant to a $150 million stock repurchase program authorized by our Board of Directors in September 2005, the Company repurchased 1,444,700 shares of its common stock for approximately $50 million during the first quarter. This stock repurchase program is intended to increase shareholder value and offset the dilutive effect of stock option exercises.

Capital Expenditures. Cash flows used for additions to property and equipment decreased to $47.6 million in 2006 from $50.4 million in 2005, due primarily to a decrease in new site spending. In 2005, we also incurred capital lease obligations of $0.4 million. We expect capital expenditures to be $140-150 million in fiscal 2006.

21

Future Liquidity. We require capital principally to grow the business through new restaurant construction, as well as to maintain, improve and refurbish existing restaurants, and for general operating purposes. Our primary short-term and long-term sources of liquidity are expected to be cash flows from operations, the revolving bank credit facility, and the sale and leaseback of certain restaurant properties. Additional sources of liquidity include the sale of company-operated restaurants to franchisees as part of our franchising strategy. Based upon current levels of operations and anticipated growth, we expect that cash flows from operations, combined with other financing alternatives in place or available, will be sufficient to meet debt service, capital expenditure and working capital requirements.

Discussion of Critical Accounting Policies

We have identified the following as the Company’s most critical accounting policies, which are those that are most important to the portrayal of the Company’s financial condition and results and require management’s most subjective and complex judgments. Information regarding the Company’s other significant accounting policies are disclosed in Note 1 of our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).

Share-based Compensation – The Company accounts for share-based compensation in accordance with SFAS 123R. Under the provisions of SFAS 123R, share-based compensation cost is estimated at the grant date based on the award’s fair-value as calculated by a binomial-based option pricing model and is recognized as expense ratably over the requisite service period. The binomial model requires various highly judgmental assumptions including volatility, forfeiture rates, and expected option life. If any of the assumptions used in the model change significantly, share-based compensation expense may differ materially in the future from that recorded in the current period.

Retirement Benefits – The Company sponsors pension and other retirement plans in various forms covering those employees who meet certain eligibility requirements. Several statistical and other factors which attempt to anticipate future events are used in calculating the expense and liability related to the plans, including assumptions about the discount rate, expected return on plan assets and the rate of increase in compensation levels, as determined by the Company using specified guidelines. In addition, our outside actuarial consultants also use certain statistical factors such as turnover, retirement and mortality rates to estimate the Company’s future benefit obligations. The actuarial assumptions used may differ materially from actual results due to changing market and economic conditions, higher or lower turnover and retirement rates or longer or shorter life spans of participants. These differences may impact the amount of pension expense recorded by the Company. Due principally to decreases in discount rates, the pension expense in fiscal year 2006 is expected to be approximately $7.7 million higher than fiscal year 2005 pension expense.

Self Insurance – The Company is self-insured for a portion of its current and prior years’ losses related to its workers’ compensation, general liability, automotive, medical, and dental programs. In estimating the Company’s self insurance accruals, we use independent actuarial estimates of expected losses, which are based on statistical analyses of historical data. These assumptions are closely monitored and adjusted when warranted by changing circumstances. Should a greater amount of claims occur compared to what was estimated or costs increase beyond what was expected, accruals might not be sufficient, and additional expense may be recorded.

Long-lived Assets – Property, equipment and certain other assets, including amortized intangible assets, are reviewed for impairment when indicators of impairment are present. This review includes a market-level analysis and evaluations of restaurant operating performance from operations and marketing management. When indicators of impairment are present, we perform an impairment analysis on a restaurant-by-restaurant basis. If the sum of undiscounted future cash flows is less than the net carrying value of the asset, we recognize an impairment loss by the amount which the carrying value exceeds the fair value of the asset. Our estimates of future cash flows may differ from actual cash flows due to, among other things, economic conditions or changes in operating performance. In fiscal 2006, we recorded immaterial impairment charges related to certain restaurant closures and we noted no other indicators of impairment of our long-lived assets.

Goodwill and Other Intangibles – We also evaluate goodwill and intangible assets not subject to amortization annually or more frequently if indicators of impairment are present. If the determined fair values of these assets are less than the related carrying amounts, an impairment loss is recognized. The methods we use to estimate fair value include future cash flow assumptions, which may differ from actual cash flows due to, among other things, economic

22

conditions or changes in operating performance. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005, we reviewed the carrying value of our goodwill and indefinite life intangible assets and determined that no impairment existed as of October 2, 2005.

Allowances for Doubtful Accounts – Our trade receivables consist primarily of amounts due from franchisees for rents on subleased sites, royalties and distribution sales. In certain circumstances, we may also have receivables related to financing provided on the sale of company-operated restaurants to certain qualified franchisees. We continually monitor amounts due from franchisees and maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our franchisees to make required payments. This estimate is based on our assessment of the collectibility of specific franchisee accounts, as well as a general allowance based on historical trends, the financial condition of our franchisees, consideration of the general economy and the aging of such receivables. The Company has good relationships with its franchisees and high collection rates; however, if the future financial condition of our franchisees were to deteriorate, resulting in their inability to make specific required payments, additions to the allowance for doubtful accounts may be required.

Legal Accruals – The Company is subject to claims and lawsuits in the ordinary course of its business. A determination of the amount accrued, if any, for these contingencies is made after analysis of each matter. We continually evaluate such accruals and may increase or decrease accrued amounts as we deem appropriate.

Future Application of Accounting Principles

In March 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Interpretation No. 47, Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations—an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 143 (“FIN 47”). FIN 47 clarifies the term conditional asset retirement obligation and requires a liability to be recorded if the fair value of the obligation can be reasonably estimated. The types of asset retirement obligations that are covered by FIN 47 are those for which an entity has a legal obligation to perform an asset retirement activity; however, the timing and/or method of settling the obligation are contingent on a future event that may or may not be within the control of the entity. FIN 47 also clarifies when an entity would have sufficient information to reasonably estimate the fair value of an asset retirement obligation. FIN 47 is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2005. We expect the adoption of FIN 47 will not have a material impact on our operating results or financial condition.

On June 1, 2005 the FASB issued SFAS 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections, which replaces APB 20, Accounting Changes, and SFAS 3, Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements. SFAS 154 applies to all voluntary changes in accounting principle, and changes the requirements of accounting for and reporting of a change in accounting principle. SFAS 154 requires retrospective application to prior periods’ financial statements of a voluntary change in accounting principle unless it is impractical. APB 20 previously required that most voluntary changes in accounting principle be recognized by including in net income of the period of the change the cumulative effect of changing to the new accounting principle. SFAS 154 is effective for accounting changes made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. Earlier application is permitted for accounting changes made in fiscal years beginning after June 1, 2005. We expect the adoption of this standard will not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Cautionary Statements Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities law. These forward-looking statements are principally contained in the sections captioned, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and Management’s Discussion and Analysis. Forward-looking statements are generally identifiable by the use of the words “anticipate,” “assume,” “believe,” “strategy,” “estimate,” “seek,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “project,” “may,” “will,” “would,” and similar expressions. Forward-looking statements are based on management’s current plans and assumptions and are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties, which may cause actual results to differ materially from expectations. You should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. The following are some of the considerations and factors that could materially affect our results.

•

Whether new interior and exterior designs will foster increases in sales at re-imaged restaurants and yield the desired return on investment.

23

•

The risk of widespread negative publicity, whether or not based in fact, which affects consumer perceptions about the health, safety or quality of food and beverages served at our restaurants.

•

Costs may exceed projections, including costs for food ingredients, utilities, real estate, insurance, equipment, technology, construction of new and remodeled restaurants, and labor including increases in minimum wage, workers compensation and other insurance and healthcare. Increases in the cost of fuel may have an adverse effect upon the company’s results due to increases in the cost of food and packaging, cost of distribution and effect upon consumer spending patterns.

•

There can be no assurances that the Company’s growth objectives in the regional domestic markets in which it operates restaurants and convenience stores will be met or that the new facilities will be profitable. Anticipated and unanticipated delays in development, sales softness and restaurant closures may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations. The development and profitability of restaurants can be adversely affected by many factors, including the ability of the Company and its franchisees to select and secure suitable sites on satisfactory terms, costs of construction, the availability of financing and general business and economic conditions.

•

Aggressive competition from numerous and varied competitors (some with significantly greater financial resources) in all areas of business, including new concepts, facility design, competition for labor, new product introductions, promotions and discounting. Additionally, the trend toward convergence in grocery, deli and other types of food services may increase the number of our competitors.

•

The realization of gains from the sales of company-operated restaurants to existing and new franchisees depends upon various factors, including sales trends, the financing market and economic conditions. The number of franchises sold and the amount of gain realized from the sale of an on-going business may not be consistent from quarter-to-quarter and may not meet expectations.

•

The risks and costs of legal claims such as class actions involving employees, franchisees, shareholders or consumers, including costs related to potential settlement or judgments.

•

The impact on the Company’s financial results from changes in accounting standards, policies or practices or related interpretations by auditors or regulatory entities, including changes in tax accounting or tax laws.

•

Information security risks and the Company’s costs or exposures associated with maintaining the security of information and the use of cashless payments. Such risks include increased investment in technology and costs of compliance with consumer protection and other laws.

•

The risks, and potential impact upon sales and expenses, of significant demographic changes, adverse weather, work stoppages, economic conditions such as inflation or recession or political conditions such as terrorist activity or the effects of war, or other significant events, particularly in California and Texas where approximately 65% of Jack in the Box restaurants are located; new legislation and governmental regulation; the possibility of unforeseen events affecting the food service industry in general and other factors over which the Company has no control can adversely affect our results of operation.

This discussion of uncertainties is not exclusive. Additional risk factors associated with our business are mentioned earlier in Management’s Discussion and Analysis in this Form 10-Q, detailed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2005 filed with the SEC and will be described from time to time in our future reports filed with the SEC. Jack in the Box Inc. assumes no obligation and does not intend to update these forward-looking statements.

24

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISKS

Our primary exposure relating to financial instruments are changes in interest rates. The Company uses interest rate swap agreements to reduce exposure to interest rate fluctuations. At April 16, 2006, the Company had two interest rate swap agreements having an aggregate notional amount of $130 million expiring March 2008. These agreements effectively convert a portion of the Company’s variable rate bank debt to fixed rate debt and have an average pay rate of 4.28%, yielding a fixed rate of 5.78% including the term loan’s 1.50% applicable margin.

Our credit facility, which is comprised of a revolving credit facility and a term loan, bears interest at an annual rate equal to the prime rate or LIBOR plus an applicable margin based on a financial leverage ratio. As of April 16, 2006, the applicable margin for the LIBOR-based revolving loans and term loan were set at 2.25% and 1.50%, respectively. A hypothetical 100 basis point increase in short-term interest rates, based on the unhedged outstanding balance of our revolving credit facility and term loan at April 16, 2006, would result in an estimated increase of $1.4 million in annual interest expense.

Changes in interest rates also impact our pension expense, as do changes in the expected long-term rate of return on our pension plan assets. An assumed discount rate is used in determining the present value of future cash outflows currently expected to be required to satisfy the pension benefit obligation when due. Additionally, an assumed long-term rate of return on plan assets is used in determining the average rate of earnings expected on the funds invested or to be invested to provide the benefits to meet our projected benefit obligation. A hypothetical 25 basis point reduction in the assumed discount rate and expected long-term rate of return on plan assets would result in an estimated increase of $1.6 million and $0.3 million, respectively, in our future annual pension expense.

We are also exposed to the impact of commodity and utility price fluctuations related to unpredictable factors such as weather and various other market conditions outside our control. Our ability to recover increased costs through higher prices is limited by the competitive environment in which we operate. From time-to-time we enter into futures and option contracts to manage these fluctuations. Open commodity futures and option contracts at April 16, 2006 were not significant.

At April 16, 2006, we had no other material financial instruments subject to significant market exposure.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Rules 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report.

There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the period covered by this quarterly report on Form 10-Q that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

There is no information required to be reported for any items under Part II, except as follows:

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

The Company is subject to normal and routine litigation. In the opinion of management, based in part on the advice of legal counsel, the ultimate liability from all pending legal proceedings, asserted legal claims and known potential legal claims should not materially affect our operating results, financial position and liquidity.

25

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

There have been no material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended October 2, 2005. You should review the brief discussion of some of those risk factors appearing under the heading “Cautionary Statements Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” in Management’s Discussion and Analysis in this Form 10-Q.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

On September 16, 2005, the Board of Directors authorized a $150 million stock repurchase program through the end of fiscal year 2008 which was announced September 21, 2005. No treasury stock purchases were made by the Company under this authorization during the quarter ended April 16, 2006, and $100 million of repurchase availability remains as of April 16, 2006.

We did not pay any cash or other dividends during the last two fiscal years. Our credit agreement provides for an aggregate amount of $200 million for the acquisition of our common stock or the potential payment of cash dividends. However, we do not anticipate paying dividends in the foreseeable future.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

Our annual meeting of stockholders was held February 17, 2006, at which the following matters were voted as indicated:


	For		Withheld		Abstain
1. Election of the following directors to serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors are elected and qualified.

Michael E. Alpert		30,919,038		1,705,802		—
Anne B. Gust		31,884,222		740,618		—
Alice B. Hayes, Ph.D.		31,883,507		741,333		—
Murray H. Hutchison		32,115,523		509,317		—
Linda A. Lang		31,764,571		860,269		—
Michael W. Murphy		32,116,098		508,742		—
L. Robert Payne		31,764,151		860,689		—
David M. Tehle		32,115,738		509,102		—


							Broker
	For		Against		Abstain		Non-Votes
2. Approve an Employee Stock Purchase Plan		29,787,681		907,753		20,087		1,909,319

							Broker
	For		Against		Abstain		Non-Votes
3. Approve Amended and Restated Performance Bonus Plan		31,493,329		1,099,108		32,403		—

							Broker
	For		Against		Abstain		Non-Votes
4. Ratification of appointment of KPMG LLP as independent registered public accountants		32,123,228		493,631		7,981		—

26

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS


Number		Description
3.1		Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended(7)

3.2		Amended and Restated Bylaws(16)

3.2(a)		“Emergency” Bylaw Amendment(24) (The bylaw allows special procedures to call, provide notice of and establish a quorum at meetings of directors should they be needed in the event of an emergency as defined in Delaware Corporate Law.)

4.1		Indenture for the 8 3/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2008(6) (Instruments with respect to the registrant’s long-term debt not in excess of 10% of the total assets of the registrant and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis have been omitted. The registrant agrees to furnish supplementally a copy of any such instrument to the Commission upon request.)

4.2		Shareholder Rights Agreement(3)

10.1		Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of January 8, 2004 by and among Jack in the Box Inc. and the lenders named therein(13)

10.1.1		First Amendment dated as of June 18, 2004 to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement(14)

10.1.2		Second Amendment and Consent dated as of September 24, 2004 to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement(18)

10.1.3		Third Amendment dated as of January 31, 2005 to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement(20)

10.1.4		Fourth Amendment dated as of September 30, 2005 to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (25)

10.2		Purchase Agreements dated as of January 22, 1987 between Foodmaker, Inc. and FFCA/IIP1985 Property Company and FFCA/IIP1986 Property Company(1)

10.3		Land Purchase Agreements dated as of February 18, 1987 by and between Foodmaker, Inc. and FFCA/IPI 1984 Property Company and FFCA/IPI 1985 Property Company and Letter Agreement relating thereto(1)

10.4.1*		Amended and Restated 1992 Employee Stock Incentive Plan(4)

10.4.2*		Jack in the Box Inc. 2002 Stock Incentive Plan(9)

10.5*		Capital Accumulation Plan for Executives(8)

10.5.1*		First Amendment dated as of August 2, 2002 to the Capital Accumulation Plan for Executives(10)

10.6*		Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan(8)

10.6.1*		First Amendment dated as of August 2, 2002 to the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan(10)

10.7*		Amended and Restated Performance Bonus Plan( 26 )

10.7.1*		Bonus Program for Fiscal 2005 Under the Performance Bonus Plan(20)

10.8*		Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Management Directors(2)

10.9*		Amended and Restated Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan(7)

10.10*		Form of Compensation and Benefits Assurance Agreement for Executives(5)

10.11*		Form of Indemnification Agreement between Jack in the Box Inc. and certain officers and directors(10)

10.12		Consent Agreement(10)

10.13*		Executive Deferred Compensation Plan(11)

10.14*		Form of Restricted Stock Award for certain executives(11)

10.14.1*		Form of Restricted Stock Award for certain executives under the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan(22)

10.14(a)		Schedule of Restricted Stock Awards (25)

10.15*		Executive Agreement between Jack in the Box Inc. and Gary J. Beisler, President and Chief Executive Officer of Qdoba Restaurant Corporation(12)

10.16*		Amended and Restated 2004 Stock Incentive Plan(19)

10.17*		Form of Stock Option Awards(15)

10.18*		Retirement Agreement between Jack in the Box Inc. and John F. Hoffner, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(17)

10.19*		Principal Officer, Terms of Employment(21)

10.20		The Jack in the Box Inc. Non-Employee Director Stock Option Award Agreement under the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan(23)

10.21*		Executive Compensation – Base Salaries (25)

31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


*		Management contract or compensatory plan.

27

(1)		Previously filed and incorporated herein by reference from registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 33-10763) filed February 24, 1987.

(2)		Previously filed and incorporated herein by reference from registrant’s Definitive Proxy Statement dated January 17, 1995 for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders on February 17, 1995.

(3)		Previously filed and incorporated by reference from registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 1, 1996.

(4)		Previously filed and incorporated herein by reference from registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-26781) filed May 9, 1997.

(5)		Previously filed and incorporated herein by reference from registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 29, 1996.

(6)		Previously filed and incorporated herein by reference from registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 12, 1998.

(7)		Previously filed and incorporated herein by reference from registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 3, 1999.

(8)		Previously filed and incorporated herein by reference from registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2001.

(9)		Previously filed and incorporated herein by reference from the registrant’s Definitive Proxy Statement dated January 18, 2002 for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders’ on February 22, 2002.

(10)		Previously filed and incorporated herein by reference from registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 29, 2002.

(11)		Previously filed and incorporated herein by reference from registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 19, 2003.

(12)		Previously filed and incorporated herein by reference from registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 13, 2003.

(13)		Previously filed and incorporated herein by reference from the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 18, 2004.

(14)		Previously filed and incorporated herein by reference from the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 4, 2004.

(15)		Previously filed and incorporated herein by reference from the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 10, 2004.

(16)		Previously filed and incorporated herein by reference from the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 7, 2004.

(17)		Previously filed and incorporated herein by reference from the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 17, 2004.

(18)		Previously filed and incorporated herein by reference from registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 3, 2004.

(19)		Previously filed and incorporated herein by reference from the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 24, 2005.

(20)		Previously filed and incorporated herein by reference from the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 23, 2005.

(21)		Previously filed and incorporated herein by reference from the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 14, 2005.

(22)		Previously filed and incorporated herein by reference from the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 24, 2005.

(23)		Previously filed and incorporated herein by reference from the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 10, 2005.

(24)		Previously filed and incorporated herein by reference from the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 10, 2005.

(25)		Previously filed and incorporated herein by reference from registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 2, 2005.

(26)		Previously filed and incorporated herein by reference from the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 17, 2006.

28

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized and in the capacities indicated.


		JACK IN THE BOX INC.

		By:		/s/ JERRY P. REBEL

				Jerry P. Rebel
				Executive Vice President
				and Chief Financial Officer
				(Principal Financial Officer)
				(Duly Authorized Signatory)

Date: May 16, 2006

Jack in the Box - 10-Q quarterly report FY

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

What is the market capitalization of a company?

DISCLAIMER

Contact

Links