QCR Holdings - 10-Q quarterly report FY2012 Q1

U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

[ X ] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ending March 31, 2012

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ________ to ________

Commission file number 0-22208

QCR HOLDINGS, INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	42-1397595
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer ID Number)

3551 7th Street, Moline, Illinois 61265

(Address of principal executive offices)

(309) 743-7761

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for past 90 days.

Yes [ X ] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Date File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes [ X ] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “accelerated filer,” “large accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer [ ] Accelerated filer [ ] Non-accelerated filer [ ] Smaller reporting company [ X ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).

Yes [ ] No [ X ]

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock as of the latest practicable date: As of May 1, 2012, the Registrant had outstanding 4,836,171 shares of common stock, $1.00 par value per share.

QCR HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

INDEX

			Page Number(s)
Part I	FINANCIAL INFORMATION

	Item 1.	Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

		Consolidated Balance Sheets	2
		As of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011

		Consolidated Statements of Income	3
		For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011

		Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income	4
		For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011

		Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders' Equity	5
		For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011

		Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	6
		For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011

		Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements	7-26

	Item 2.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and	27-51
		Results of Operations

	Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	52-53

	Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	54



Part II	OTHER INFORMATION

	Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	55

	Item 1.A.	Risk Factors	55

	Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	55

	Item 3.	Defaults upon Senior Securities	55

	Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	55

	Item 5.	Other Information	55

	Item 6.	Exhibits	56

Signatures			57

QCR HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)

As of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011

	March 31, 2012			December 31, 2011
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks	$	39,239,858		$	53,136,710
Federal funds sold		-			20,785,000
Interest-bearing deposits at financial institutions		25,488,213			26,750,602

Securities held to maturity, at amortized cost		200,000			200,000
Securities available for sale, at fair value		616,190,515			565,029,291
Total securities		616,390,515			565,229,291

Loans receivable held for sale		3,330,110			3,832,760
Loans/leases receivable held for investment		1,208,399,321			1,196,912,737
Gross loans/leases receivable		1,211,729,431			1,200,745,497
Less allowance for estimated losses on loans/leases		(19,006,644	)		(18,789,262	)
Net loans/leases receivable		1,192,722,787			1,181,956,235

Premises and equipment, net		31,689,186			31,740,751
Goodwill		3,222,688			3,222,688
Accrued interest receivable		6,886,434			6,510,021
Bank-owned life insurance		42,449,683			42,011,281
Prepaid FDIC insurance		3,369,151			3,683,406
Restricted investment securities		15,109,000			15,253,600
Other real estate owned, net		8,172,171			8,385,758
Other assets		8,258,507			7,944,711

Total assets	$	1,992,998,193		$	1,966,610,054

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
LIABILITIES
Deposits:
Noninterest-bearing	$	385,806,452		$	357,183,481
Interest-bearing		910,942,681			848,274,307
Total deposits		1,296,749,133			1,205,457,788

Short-term borrowings		149,900,500			213,536,450
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		203,750,000			204,750,000
Other borrowings		136,233,688			136,231,663
Junior subordinated debentures		36,085,000			36,085,000
Other liabilities		24,512,698			26,116,451
Total liabilities		1,847,231,019			1,822,177,352

STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Preferred stock, $1 par value; shares authorized 250,000, March 2012 and December 31, 2011 - 65,090 shares issued and outstanding		65,090			65,090
Common stock, $1 par value; shares authorized 20,000,000, March 2012 - 4,944,672 shares issued and 4,823,426 outstanding, December 2011 - 4,879,435 shares issued and 4,758,189 outstanding		4,944,672			4,879,435
Additional paid-in capital		90,026,845			89,702,533
Retained earnings		46,884,095			44,585,902
Accumulated other comprehensive income		3,237,479			4,754,714
Noncontrolling interests		2,215,503			2,051,538
Less treasury stock, March 2012 and December 2011 - 121,246 common shares, at cost		(1,606,510	)		(1,606,510	)
Total stockholders' equity		145,767,174			144,432,702
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	1,992,998,193		$	1,966,610,054

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

QCR HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (UNAUDITED)

Three Months Ended March 31,

	2012			2011
Interest and dividend income:
Loans/leases, including fees	$	15,970,837		$	15,734,640
Securities:
Taxable		2,805,814			2,336,239
Nontaxable		395,826			239,346
Interest-bearing deposits at financial institutions		120,005			111,149
Restricted investment securities		81,322			163,520
Federal funds sold		-			66,338
Total interest and dividend income		19,373,804			18,651,232

Interest expense:
Deposits		1,715,740			2,425,554
Short-term borrowings		64,944			113,666
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		1,864,321			2,143,376
Other borrowings		1,257,393			1,279,179
Junior subordinated debentures		267,953			480,655
Total interest expense		5,170,351			6,442,430

Net interest income		14,203,453			12,208,802

Provision for loan/lease losses		780,446			1,067,664
Net interest income after provision for loan/lease losses		13,423,007			11,141,138

Noninterest income:
Trust department fees		883,732			950,802
Investment advisory and management fees, gross		521,462			531,218
Deposit service fees		904,406			872,672
Gains on sales of loans, net		399,090			759,693
Securities gains		-			880,312
Losses on sales of other real estate owned, net		(189,204	)		(25,098	)
Earnings on bank-owned life insurance		438,402			344,411
Credit card issuing fees, net of processing costs		127,015			141,160
Other		871,975			601,954
Total noninterest income		3,956,878			5,057,124

Noninterest expense:
Salaries and employee benefits		8,124,680			7,473,503
Occupancy and equipment expense		1,352,263			1,289,455
Professional and data processing fees		1,150,190			1,124,522
FDIC and other insurance		580,856			882,730
Loan/lease expense		218,734			276,228
Advertising and marketing		276,016			224,729
Postage and telephone		288,240			230,185
Stationery and supplies		142,966			134,643
Bank service charges		199,729			161,178
Prepayment fees on Federal Home Loan Bank advances		-			832,099
Other		404,406			382,999
Total noninterest expense		12,738,080			13,012,271

Net income before income taxes		4,641,805			3,185,991
Federal and state income tax expense		1,238,956			954,507
Net income	$	3,402,849		$	2,231,484
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		166,031			106,524
Net income attributable to QCR Holdings, Inc.	$	3,236,818		$	2,124,960

Less: Preferred stock dividends and discount accretion		938,625			1,032,371
Net income attributable to QCR Holdings, Inc. common stockholders		2,298,193		$	1,092,589

Earnings per common share attributable to QCR Holdings, Inc. common shareholders
Basic	$	0.48		$	0.23
Diluted	$	0.48		$	0.23

Weighted average common shares outstanding		4,800,407			4,671,715
Weighted average common and common equivalent shares outstanding		4,833,399			4,683,717

Cash dividends declared per common share	$	-		$	-

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

QCR HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (UNAUDITED)

Three Months Ended March 31,

	2012			2011
Net income	$	3,402,849		$	2,231,484

Other comprehensive loss:
Unrealized gains (losses) on securities available for sale:
Unrealized holding losses arising during the period before tax		(2,460,571	)		(3,060,851	)
Less reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income before tax		-			880,312
		(2,460,571	)		(2,180,539	)
Tax benefit		(943,336	)		(834,985	)
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax		(1,517,235	)		(1,345,554	)

Comprehensive income attributable to QCR Holdings, Inc.	$	1,885,614		$	885,930

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

QCR HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (UNAUDITED)

Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011

	Preferred Stock		Common Stock			Additional Paid-In Capital			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income			Noncontrolling Interests			Treasury Stock			Total
Balance December 31, 2011	$	65,090	$	4,879,435		$	89,702,533		$	44,585,902		$	4,754,714		$	2,051,538		$	(1,606,510	)	$	144,432,702
Comprehensive income:
Net income		-		-			-			3,236,818			-			166,031			-			3,402,849
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax		-		-			-			-			(1,517,235	)		-			-			(1,517,235	)
Comprehensive income																						1,885,614
Preferred cash dividends declared		-		-			-			(938,625	)		-			-			-			(938,625	)
Proceeds from issuance of 7,767 shares of common stock as a result of stock purchase under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan		-		7,767			55,566			-			-			-			-			63,333
Proceeds from issuance of 276 shares of common stock as a result of stock options exercised		-		276			2,374			-			-			-			-			2,650
Exchange of 576 shares of common stock in connection with payroll taxes for restricted stock		-		(576	)		(2,103	)		-			-			-			-			(2,679	)
Stock compensation expense		-		-			326,245															326,245
Restricted stock awards		-		57,770			(57,770	)		-			-			-			-			-
Distributions to noncontrolling interests		-		-			-			-			-			(2,066	)		-			(2,066	)
Balance March 31, 2012	$	65,090	$	4,944,672		$	90,026,845		$	46,884,095		$	3,237,479		$	2,215,503		$	(1,606,510	)	$	145,767,174

	Preferred Stock		Common Stock			Additional Paid-In Capital			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Noncontrolling Interests			Treasury Stock			Total
Balance December 31, 2010	$	63,237	$	4,732,428		$	86,478,269		$	40,550,900		$	704,165		$	1,648,219		$	(1,606,510	)	$	132,570,708
Comprehensive income:
Net income		-		-			-			2,124,960			-			106,524			-			2,231,484
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax		-		-			-			-			(1,345,554	)		-			-			(1,345,554	)
Comprehensive income																						885,930
Preferred cash dividends declared		-		-			-			(915,462	)		-			-			-			(915,462	)
Discount accretion on cumulative preferred stock		-		-			116,909			(116,909	)		-			-			-			-
Proceeds from issuance of 9,081 shares of common stock as a result of stock purchase under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan		-		9,081			49,249			-			-			-			-			58,330
Proceeds from issuance of 24,300 shares of common stock as a result of stock options exercised		-		24,300			146,067			-			-			-			-			170,367
Exchange of 2,171 shares of common stock in connection with stock options exercised		-		(2,171	)		(14,070	)		-			-			-			-			(16,241	)
Stock compensation expense		-		-			206,569															206,569
Restricted stock awards		-		69,924			(69,924	)		-			-			-			-			-
Distributions to noncontrolling interests		-		-			-			-			-			(2,065	)		-			(2,065	)
Balance March 31, 2011	$	63,237	$	4,833,562		$	86,913,069		$	41,643,489		$	(641,389	)	$	1,752,678		$	(1,606,510	)	$	132,958,136

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

QCR HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)

Three Months Ended March 31,

	2012			2011
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income	$	3,402,849		$	2,231,484
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation		591,465			595,249
Provision for loan/lease losses		780,446			1,067,664
Amortization of offering costs on subordinated debentures		3,579			3,579
Stock-based compensation expense		326,245			246,074
Losses on sales of other real estate owned, net		189,204			25,098
Amortization of premiums on securities, net		983,617			888,895
Securities gains		-			(880,312	)
Loans originated for sale		(24,070,517	)		(20,240,641	)
Proceeds on sales of loans		24,972,257			33,816,963
Gains on sales of loans, net		(399,090	)		(759,693	)
Prepayment fees on Federal Home Loan Bank advances		-			832,099
Increase in accrued interest receivable		(376,413	)		(99,677	)
Decrease in prepaid FDIC insurance		314,255			621,382
Increase in cash value of bank-owned life insurance		(438,402	)		(344,411	)
Decrease in other assets		623,895			1,114,324
Decrease in other liabilities		(1,327,767	)		(2,002,950	)
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	5,575,623		$	17,115,127

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Net decrease (increase) in federal funds sold		20,785,000			(7,300,000	)
Net decrease in interest-bearing deposits at financial institutions		1,262,389			11,370,983
Proceeds from sales of other real estate owned		209,383			1,850,360
Activity in securities portfolio:
Purchases		(159,077,553	)		(168,245,889	)
Calls, maturities and redemptions		98,751,724			61,590,000
Paydowns		5,720,417			361,643
Sales		-			37,394,079
Activity in restricted investment securities:
Purchases		(189,400	)		-
Redemptions		334,000			1,247,300
Net (increase) decrease in loans/leases originated and held for investment		(12,234,648	)		1,553,348
Purchase of premises and equipment		(539,900	)		(328,656	)
Net cash used in investing activities	$	(44,978,588	)	$	(60,506,832	)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Net increase in deposit accounts		91,291,345			80,042,029
Net decrease in short-term borrowings		(63,635,950	)		(6,282,756	)
Activity in Federal Home Loan Bank advances:
Advances		4,000,000			-
Calls and maturities		(5,000,000	)		(13,500,000	)
Prepayments		-			(15,832,099	)
Net increase (decrease) in other borrowings		2,025			(6,440,937	)
Payment of cash dividends on common and preferred stock		(1,214,611	)		(1,098,883	)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net		63,304			212,456
Net cash provided by financing activities	$	25,506,113		$	37,099,810

Net decrease in cash and due from banks		(13,896,852	)		(6,291,895	)
Cash and due from banks, beginning		53,136,710			42,030,806
Cash and due from banks, ending	$	39,239,858		$	35,738,911

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information, cash payments for:
Interest	$	5,141,834		$	6,590,262

Income/franchise taxes	$	591,000		$	368,270

Supplemental schedule of noncash investing activities:
Change in accumulated other comprehensive income, unrealized gains (losses) on securities available for sale, net	$	(1,517,235	)	$	(1,345,554	)

Transfers of loans to other real estate owned	$	185,000		$	1,698,351

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Part I

Item 1

QCR HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

March 31, 2012

NOTE 1 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of presentation: The interim unaudited consolidated financial statements contained herein should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, including QCR Holdings, Inc.’s (the “Company”) Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 8, 2012. Accordingly, footnote disclosures, which would substantially duplicate the disclosures contained in the audited consolidated financial statements, have been omitted.

The financial information of the Company included herein has been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial reporting and has been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations for reporting on Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Such information reflects all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and results of operations for the periods presented. Any differences appearing between the numbers presented in financial statements and management’s discussion and analysis are due to rounding. The results of the interim period ended March 31, 2012, are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the year ending December 31, 2012.

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries which include three state-chartered commercial banks: Quad City Bank & Trust Company (“QCBT”), Cedar Rapids Bank & Trust Company (“CRBT”), and Rockford Bank & Trust Company (“RB&T”). The Company also engages in direct financing lease contracts through the 80% equity investment by QCBT in m2 Lease Funds, LLC (“m2 Lease Funds”), and in real estate holdings through its 91% equity investment in Velie Plantation Holding Company, LLC (“VPHC”). All material intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

Recent accounting developments: In April 2011, Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU No. 2011-03, Transfers and Servicing (Topic 860) - Reconsideration of Effective Control for Repurchase Agreements. ASU 2011-03 is intended to improve financial reporting of repurchase agreements and other agreements that both entitle and obligate a transferor to repurchase or redeem financial assets before their maturity. ASU 2011-03 removes from the assessment of effective control (i) the criterion requiring the transferor to have the ability to repurchase or redeem the financial assets on substantially the agreed terms, even in the event of default by the transferee, and (ii) the collateral maintenance guidance related to that criterion. ASU 2011-03 was effective for the Company on January 1, 2012 and did not have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Part I

Item 1

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)-continued

In May 2011, FASB issued ASU 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820) - Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurements and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS. ASU 2011-04 amends Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, to converge the fair value measurement guidance in U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and International Financial Reporting Standards. ASU 2011-04 clarifies the application of existing fair value measurement requirements, changes certain principles in Topic 820 and requires additional fair value disclosures. ASU 2011-04 was effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011, and did not have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In June 2011, FASB issued ASU 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220) - Presentation of Comprehensive Income. ASU 2011-05 amends Topic 220, Comprehensive Income, to require that all nonowner changes in stockholders’ equity be presented in either a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. Additionally, ASU 2011-05 requires entities to present, on the face of the financial statements, reclassification adjustments for items that are reclassified from other comprehensive income to net income in the statement or statements where the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income are presented. The option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity was eliminated. ASU 2011-05 was effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. Additionally, in December 2011, FASB issued ASU 2011-12, Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in ASU No. 2011-05. ASU 2011-12 defers the effective date for the changes in ASU 2011-05 that specifically refer to the presentation of the effects of reclassifications adjustments out of accumulated other comprehensive income on the components of net income and other comprehensive income on the face of the financial statements for all periods presented. ASU 2011-12 reinstates the requirements of the presentation of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income that were in place before the issuance of ASU 2011-05. ASU 2011-12 and 2011-05 were both effective for the Company for the quarter ending March 31, 2012. See new separate consolidated statements of comprehensive income within the consolidated financial statements.

In September 2011, FASB issued ASU 2011-08, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other: Testing Goodwill for Impairment. ASU 2011-08 allows the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining the need to perform step one of the annual test for goodwill impairment. ASU 2011-08 was effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. ASU 2011-08 did not have any effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In December 2011, FASB issued ASU 2011-11, Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities. ASU 2011-11 requires entities to disclose both gross information and net information about both instruments and transactions eligible for offset in the balance sheet, and instruments and transactions subject to an agreement similar to a master netting arrangement. ASU 2011-11 is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods. Adoption is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Part I

Item 1

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)-continued

NOTE 2 – INVESTMENT SECURITIES

The amortized cost and fair value of investment securities as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 are summarized as follows:

	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized (Losses)			Fair Value
March 31, 2012:
Securities held to maturity, other bonds	$	200,000	$	-	$	-		$	200,000

Securities available for sale:
U.S. govt. sponsored agency securities	$	431,920,359	$	1,625,404	$	(1,376,270	)	$	432,169,493
Residential mortgage-backed and related securities		125,034,762		3,561,180		(63,353	)		128,532,589
Municipal securities		52,549,973		1,630,825		(368,975	)		53,811,823
Trust preferred securities		86,200		17,800		-			104,000
Other securities		1,364,286		246,616		(38,292	)		1,572,610
	$	610,955,580	$	7,081,825	$	(1,846,890	)	$	616,190,515

December 31, 2011:
Securities held to maturity, other bonds	$	200,000	$	-	$	-		$	200,000

Securities available for sale:
U.S. govt. sponsored agency securities	$	426,581,913	$	2,428,994	$	(55,687	)	$	428,955,220
Residential mortgage-backed and related securities		105,373,614		3,488,350		(8,215	)		108,853,749
Municipal securities		23,937,118		1,752,246		-			25,689,364
Trust preferred securities		86,200		-		(5,400	)		80,800
Other securities		1,354,940		140,022		(44,804	)		1,450,158
	$	557,333,785	$	7,809,612	$	(114,106	)	$	565,029,291

The Company’s residential mortgage backed and related securities portfolio consists entirely of government sponsored or government guaranteed securities. The Company currently has no commercial mortgage-backed securities or pooled trust preferred investments.

Part I

Item 1

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)-continued

Gross unrealized losses and fair value, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, are summarized as follows:

	Less than 12 Months					12 Months or More					Total
	Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses
March 31, 2012:
Securities available for sale:
U.S. govt. sponsored agency securities	$	187,572,041	$	(1,376,270	)	$	-	$	-		$	187,572,041	$	(1,376,270	)
Residential mortgage-backed and related securities		13,484,869		(63,353	)		-		-			13,484,869		(63,353	)
Municipal securities		21,942,002		(368,975	)		-		-			21,942,002		(368,975	)
Other securities		201,875		(38,292	)		-		-			201,875		(38,292	)
	$	223,200,787	$	(1,846,890	)	$	-	$	-		$	223,200,787	$	(1,846,890	)

December 31, 2011:
Securities available for sale:
U.S. govt. sponsored agency securities	$	59,979,620	$	(55,687	)	$	-	$	-		$	59,979,620	$	(55,687	)
Residential mortgage-backed and related securities		4,906,398		(8,215	)		-		-			4,906,398		(8,215	)
Trust preferred securities		-		-			80,800		(5,400	)		80,800		(5,400	)
Other securities		251,957		(44,332	)		2,778		(472	)		254,735		(44,804	)
	$	65,137,975	$	(108,234	)	$	83,578	$	(5,872	)	$	65,221,553	$	(114,106	)

At March 31, 2012, the investment portfolio included 360 securities. Of this number, 99 securities had current unrealized losses with aggregate depreciation less than 1% from the amortized cost basis. Of these 99, none had unrealized losses for twelve months or more. All of the debt securities in unrealized loss positions are considered acceptable credit risks. Based upon an evaluation of the available evidence, including the recent changes in market rates, credit rating information and information obtained from regulatory filings, management believes the declines in fair value for these debt securities are temporary. In addition, the Company does not intend to sell these securities and it is not more-likely-than-not that the Company will be required to sell these debt securities before their anticipated recovery. At March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, equity securities represented less than 1% of the total portfolio.

The Company did not recognize other-than-temporary impairment on any debt or equity securities for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011.

Part I

Item 1

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)-continued

All sales of securities, as applicable, for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, were from securities identified as available for sale. Information on proceeds received, as well as pre-tax gross gains from sales of those securities is as follows:

	Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2012		March 31, 2011

Proceeds from sales of securities	$	-	$	37,394,079
Pre-tax gross gains from sales of securities		-		880,312

The amortized cost and fair value of securities as of March 31, 2012 by contractual maturity are shown below. A portion of the Company’s U.S. government sponsored agency securities contain call options which allow the issuer, at its discretion, to call the security at predetermined dates prior to the contractual maturity date. Expected maturities of residential mortgage-backed and related securities may differ from contractual maturities because the residential mortgages underlying the residential mortgage-backed and related securities may be called or prepaid without any penalties. Therefore, these securities are not included in the maturity categories in the following table. “Other securities” are excluded from the maturity categories as there is no fixed maturity date.

	Amortized Cost		Fair Value
Securities held to maturity:
Due in one year or less	$	50,000	$	50,000
Due after one year through five years		100,000		100,000
Due after five years		50,000		50,000
	$	200,000	$	200,000

Securities available for sale:
Due in one year or less	$	2,195,161	$	2,218,532
Due after one year through five years		63,858,017		64,143,310
Due after five years		418,503,354		419,723,474
	$	484,556,532	$	486,085,316
Residential mortgage-backed and related securities		125,034,762		128,532,589
Other securities		1,364,286		1,572,610
	$	610,955,580	$	616,190,515

Part I

Item 1

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)-continued

NOTE 3 – LOANS/LEASES RECEIVABLE

The composition of the loan/lease portfolio as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 is presented as follows:

	As of March 31, 2012			As of December 31, 2011

Commercial and industrial loans	$	352,748,727		$	350,794,278
Commercial real estate loans
Owner-occupied commercial real estate		182,274,459			167,790,621
Commercial construction, land development, and other land		50,706,381			60,384,738
Other non owner-occupied commercial real estate		347,964,861			349,628,491
		580,945,701			577,803,850

Direct financing leases *		96,314,214			93,212,362
Residential real estate loans **		103,527,892			98,107,051
Installment and other consumer loans		75,546,187			78,223,080
		1,209,082,721			1,198,140,621
Plus deferred loan/lease orgination costs, net of fees		2,646,710			2,604,876
		1,211,729,431			1,200,745,497
Less allowance for estimated losses on loans/leases		(19,006,644	)		(18,789,262	)
	$	1,192,722,787		$	1,181,956,235


* Direct financing leases:
Net minimum lease payments to be received	$	109,729,721		$	106,389,988
Estimated unguaranteed residual values of leased assets		1,110,604			1,043,326
Unearned lease/residual income		(14,526,111	)		(14,220,952	)
		96,314,214			93,212,362
Plus deferred lease origination costs, net of fees		3,404,964			3,217,011
		99,719,178			96,429,373
Less allowance for estimated losses on leases		(1,366,529	)		(1,339,496	)
	$	98,352,649		$	95,089,877

**Includes residential real estate loans held for sale totaling $3,330,110 and $3,832,760 as of March 31, 2012, and December 31, 2011, respectively.

Management performs an evaluation of the estimated unguaranteed residual values of leased assets on an annual basis, at a minimum. The evaluation consists of discussions with reputable and current vendors and management’s expertise and understanding of the current states of particular industries to determine informal valuations of the equipment. As necessary and where available, management will utilize valuations by independent appraisers. The large majority of leases with residual values contain a lease options rider which requires the lessee to pay the residual value directly, finance the payment of the residual value, or extend the lease term to pay the residual value. In these cases, the residual value is protected and the risk of loss is minimal.

Part I

Item 1

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)-continued

For the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, there were no losses on residual values. At March 31, 2012, the Company had 38 leases remaining with residual values totaling $1,110,604 that were not protected with a lease end options rider. At December 31, 2011, the Company had 39 leases remaining with residual values totaling $1,043,326 that were not protected with a lease end options rider. Management has performed specific evaluations of these residual values and determined that the valuations are appropriate.

The aging of the loan/lease portfolio by classes of loans/leases as of March 31, 2012 is presented as follows:

Classes of Loans/Leases	Current			30-59 Days Past Due			60-89 Days Past Due			Accruing Past Due 90 Days or More			Nonaccrual Loans/Leases			Total

Commercial and Industrial	$	349,266,599		$	279,066		$	685,751		$	120,000		$	2,397,311		$	352,748,727
Commercial Real Estate
Owner-Occupied Commercial Real Estate		181,555,172			-			-			-			719,287			182,274,459
Commercial Construction, Land Development, and Other Land		46,183,612			-			1,037,225			-			3,485,544			50,706,381
Other Non Owner-Occupied Commercial Real Estate		329,018,336			2,321,894			6,398,902			548,566			9,677,163			347,964,861
Direct Financing Leases		94,594,385			876,827			122,271			-			720,731			96,314,214
Residential Real Estate		101,992,447			559,933			-			-			975,512			103,527,892
Installment and Other Consumer		73,959,016			301,889			195,397			51,967			1,037,918			75,546,187
	$	1,176,569,567		$	4,339,609		$	8,439,546		$	720,533		$	19,013,466		$	1,209,082,721

As a percentage of total loan/lease portfolio		97.31	%		0.36	%		0.70	%		0.06	%		1.57	%		100.00	%

The aging of the loan/lease portfolio by classes of loans/leases as of December 31, 2011 is presented as follows:

Classes of Loans/Leases	Current			30-59 Days Past Due			60-89 Days Past Due			Accruing Past Due 90 Days or More			Nonaccrual Loans/Leases			Total

Commercial and Industrial	$	347,417,683		$	226,394		$	239,991		$	120,000		$	2,790,210		$	350,794,278
Commercial Real Estate
Owner-Occupied Commercial Real Estate		166,632,318			146,847			-			-			1,011,456			167,790,621
Commercial Construction, Land Development, and Other Land		55,741,827			211,878			486,802			968,919			2,975,312			60,384,738
Other Non Owner-Occupied Commercial Real Estate		336,080,128			522,323			3,732,935			-			9,293,105			349,628,491
Direct Financing Leases		91,273,406			826,187			396,344			-			716,425			93,212,362
Residential Real Estate		95,456,433			1,127,465			389,678			-			1,133,475			98,107,051
Installment and Other Consumer		76,376,399			737,543			12,122			22,160			1,074,856			78,223,080
	$	1,168,978,194		$	3,798,637		$	5,257,872		$	1,111,079		$	18,994,839		$	1,198,140,621

As a percentage of total loan/lease portfolio		97.57	%		0.32	%		0.44	%		0.09	%		1.59	%		100.00	%

Part I

Item 1

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)-continued

Nonperforming loans/leases by classes of loans/leases as of March 31, 2012 is presented as follows:

Classes of Loans/Leases	Accruing Past Due 90 Days or More		Nonaccrual Loans/Leases *		Troubled Debt Restructurings - Accruing		Total Nonperforming Loans/Leases		Percentage of Total Nonperforming Loans/Leases

Commercial and Industrial	$	120,000	$	2,397,311	$	186,359	$	2,703,670		8.83	%
Commercial Real Estate
Owner-Occupied Commercial Real Estate		-		719,287		-		719,287		2.35	%
Commercial Construction, Land Development, and Other Land		-		3,485,544		4,213,314		7,698,858		25.16	%
Other Non Owner-Occupied Commercial Real Estate		548,566		9,677,163		6,284,647		16,510,376		53.95	%
Direct Financing Leases		-		720,731		-		720,731		2.36	%
Residential Real Estate		-		975,512		167,739		1,143,251		3.74	%
Installment and Other Consumer		51,967		1,037,918		16,043		1,105,928		3.61	%
	$	720,533	$	19,013,466	$	10,868,102	$	30,602,101		100.00	%

*Nonaccrual loans/leases includes $8,777,102 of troubled debt restructurings, including $178,386 in commercial and industrial loans, $8,255,316 in commercial real estate loans, $64,726 in direct financing leases, and $278,674 in installment loans.

Nonperforming loans/leases by classes of loans/leases as of December 31, 2011 is presented as follows:

Classes of Loans/Leases	Accruing Past Due 90 Days or More		Nonaccrual Loans/Leases **		Troubled Debt Restructurings - Accruing		Total Nonperforming Loans/Leases		Percentage of Total Nonperforming Loans/Leases

Commercial and Industrial	$	120,000	$	2,790,210	$	187,407	$	3,097,617		9.68	%
Commercial Real Estate
Owner-Occupied Commercial Real Estate		-		1,011,456		-		1,011,456		3.16	%
Commercial Construction, Land Development, and Other Land		968,919		2,975,312		6,076,143		10,020,374		31.30	%
Other Non Owner-Occupied Commercial Real Estate		-		9,293,105		5,049,795		14,342,900		44.81	%
Direct Financing Leases		-		716,425		590,238		1,306,663		4.08	%
Residential Real Estate		-		1,133,475		-		1,133,475		3.54	%
Installment and Other Consumer		22,160		1,074,856		-		1,097,016		3.43	%
	$	1,111,079	$	18,994,839	$	11,903,583	$	32,009,501		100.00	%

**Nonaccrual loans/leases includes $8,622,874 of troubled debt restructurings, including $198,697 in commercial and industrial loans, $8,074,777 in commercial real estate loans, $64,726 in direct financing leases, and $284,674 in installment loans.

Part I

Item 1

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)-continued

Changes in the allowance for estimated losses on loans/leases by portfolio segment for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, are presented as follows:

	Three Months Ended March 31, 2012

	Commercial and Industrial			Commercial Real Estate		Direct Financing Leases			Residential Real Estate			Installment and Other Consumer			Total

Balance, beginning	$	4,878,006		$	10,596,958	$	1,339,496		$	704,946		$	1,269,856		$	18,789,262
Provisions charged to expense		(90,900	)		257,864		315,446			262,968			35,068			780,446
Loans/leases charged off		(376,408	)		-		(315,721	)		(4,757	)		(127,866	)		(824,752	)
Recoveries on loans/leases previously charged off		174,769			620		27,307			-			58,992			261,688
Balance, ending	$	4,585,467		$	10,855,442	$	1,366,528		$	963,157		$	1,236,050		$	19,006,644

	Three Months Ended March 31, 2011

	Commercial and Industrial			Commercial Real Estate			Direct Financing Leases			Residential Real Estate			Installment and Other Consumer			Total

Balance, beginning	$	7,548,922		$	9,087,315		$	1,530,572		$	748,028		$	1,449,819		$	20,364,656
Provisions charged to expense		991,519			(472,152	)		180,664			(41,723	)		409,356			1,067,664
Loans/leases charged off		(196,716	)		(130	)		(243,446	)		-			(440,635	)		(880,927	)
Recoveries on loans/leases previously charged off		110,374			16,666			144			-			51,439			178,623
Balance, ending	$	8,454,099		$	8,631,699		$	1,467,934		$	706,305		$	1,469,979		$	20,730,016

The allowance for estimated losses on loans/leases by impairment evaluation and by portfolio segment as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 is presented as follows:

	As of March 31, 2012
	Commercial and Industrial			Commercial Real Estate			Direct Financing Leases			Residential Real Estate			Installment and Other Consumer			Total

Allowance for loans/leases individually evaluated for impairment	$	371,974		$	3,824,121		$	35,000		$	155,102		$	19,911		$	4,406,108
Allowance for loans/leases collectively evaluated for impairment		4,213,493			7,031,321			1,331,528			808,055			1,216,139			14,600,536
	$	4,585,467		$	10,855,442		$	1,366,528		$	963,157		$	1,236,050		$	19,006,644


Loans/leases individually evaluated for impairment	$	1,799,183		$	24,246,328		$	720,731		$	1,143,251		$	971,342		$	28,880,835
Loans/leases collectively evaluated for impairment		350,949,544			556,699,373			95,593,483			102,384,641			74,574,845			1,180,201,886
	$	352,748,727		$	580,945,701		$	96,314,214		$	103,527,892		$	75,546,187		$	1,209,082,721


Allowance as a percentage of loans/leases individually evaluated for impairment		20.67	%		15.77	%		4.86	%		13.57	%		2.05	%		15.26	%
Allowance as a percentage of loans/leases collectively evaluated for impairment		1.20	%		1.26	%		1.39	%		0.79	%		1.63	%		1.24	%
		1.30	%		1.87	%		1.42	%		0.93	%		1.64	%		1.57	%

	As of December 31, 2011
	Commercial and Industrial			Commercial Real Estate			Direct Financing Leases			Residential Real Estate			Installment and Other Consumer			Total

Allowance for loans/leases individually evaluated for impairment	$	903,187		$	4,297,738		$	66,675		$	55,884		$	22,819		$	5,346,303
Allowance for loans/leases collectively evaluated for impairment		3,974,819			6,299,220			1,272,821			649,062			1,247,037			13,442,959
	$	4,878,006		$	10,596,958		$	1,339,496		$	704,946		$	1,269,856		$	18,789,262

Loans/leases individually evaluated for impairment	$	2,152,855		$	24,281,365		$	1,306,663		$	1,133,474		$	984,806		$	29,859,163
Loans/leases collectively evaluated for impairment		348,641,423			553,522,485			91,905,699			96,973,577			77,238,274			1,168,281,458
	$	350,794,278		$	577,803,850		$	93,212,362		$	98,107,051		$	78,223,080		$	1,198,140,621

Allowance as a percentage of loans/leases individually evaluated for impairment		41.95	%		17.70	%		5.10	%		4.93	%		2.32	%		17.91	%
Allowance as a percentage of loans/leases collectively evaluated for impairment		1.14	%		1.14	%		1.38	%		0.67	%		1.61	%		1.15	%
		1.39	%		1.83	%		1.44	%		0.72	%		1.62	%		1.56	%

Part I

Item 1

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)-continued

Information for impaired loans/leases is presented in the tables below. The recorded investment represents customer balances net of any partial charge-offs recognized on the loan/lease. The unpaid principal balance represents the recorded balance outstanding on the loan/lease prior to any partial charge-offs.

Information for impaired loans/leases by classes of financing receivable as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2012 is as follows:

Classes of Loans/Leases	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized		Interest Income Recognized for Cash Payments Received

Impaired Loans/Leases with No Specific Allowance Recorded:
Commercial and Industrial	$	358,028	$	1,005,019	$	-	$	396,127	$	-	$	-
Commercial Real Estate
Owner-Occupied Commercial Real Estate		581,747		581,747		-		637,245		-		-
Commercial Construction, Land Development, and Other Land		337,500		337,500		-		112,500		2,168		2,168
Other Non Owner-Occupied Commercial Real Estate		3,735,092		3,735,092		-		4,367,673		894		894
Direct Financing Leases		602,456		602,456		-		922,197		-		-
Residential Real Estate		676,244		676,244		-		815,292		1,673		1,673
Installment and Other Consumer		951,431		951,431		-		950,111		23		23
	$	7,242,498	$	7,889,489	$	-	$	8,201,145	$	4,758	$	4,758

Impaired Loans/Leases with Specific Allowance Recorded:
Commercial and Industrial	$	1,441,155	$	1,791,155	$	371,974	$	1,648,384	$	1,980	$	1,980
Commercial Real Estate
Owner-Occupied Commercial Real Estate		199,427		199,427		30,279		199,427		-		-
Commercial Construction, Land Development, and Other Land		7,941,358		7,941,358		2,166,666		7,891,719		-		-
Other Non Owner-Occupied Commercial Real Estate		11,451,204		11,951,204		1,627,176		11,496,658		67,551		67,551
Direct Financing Leases		118,275		118,275		35,000		91,501		-		-
Residential Real Estate		467,007		467,007		155,102		383,095		-		-
Installment and Other Consumer		19,911		19,911		19,911		20,021		-		-
	$	21,638,337	$	22,488,337	$	4,406,108	$	21,730,805	$	69,531	$	69,531

Total Impaired Loans/Leases:
Commercial and Industrial	$	1,799,183	$	2,796,174	$	371,974	$	2,044,511	$	1,980	$	1,980
Commercial Real Estate
Owner-Occupied Commercial Real Estate		781,174		781,174		30,279		836,672		-		-
Commercial Construction, Land Development, and Other Land		8,278,858		8,278,858		2,166,666		8,004,219		2,168		2,168
Other Non Owner-Occupied Commercial Real Estate		15,186,296		15,686,296		1,627,176		15,864,331		68,445		68,445
Direct Financing Leases		720,731		720,731		35,000		1,013,698		-		-
Residential Real Estate		1,143,251		1,143,251		155,102		1,198,387		1,673		1,673
Installment and Other Consumer		971,342		971,342		19,911		970,132		23		23
	$	28,880,835	$	30,377,826	$	4,406,108	$	29,931,950	$	74,289	$	74,289

Impaired loans/leases for which no allowance has been provided have adequate collateral, based on management’s current estimates.

Part I

Item 1

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)-continued

Information for impaired loans/leases by classes of financing receivable for the three months ended March 31, 2011 is as follows:

Classes of Loans/Leases	Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized		Interest Income Recognized for Cash Payments Received

Impaired Loans/Leases with No Specific Allowance Recorded:
Commercial and Industrial	$	1,729,347	$	-	$	-
Commercial Real Estate
Owner-Occupied Commercial Real Estate		1,316,373		-		-
Commercial Construction, Land Development, and Other Land		1,797,506		-		-
Other Non Owner-Occupied Commercial Real Estate		1,361,650		-		-
Direct Financing Leases		912,337		-		-
Residential Real Estate		1,012,629		-		-
Installment and Other Consumer		998,891		-		-
	$	9,128,733	$	-	$	-

Impaired Loans/Leases with Specific Allowance Recorded:
Commercial and Industrial	$	7,184,670	$	14,256	$	14,256
Commercial Real Estate
Owner-Occupied Commercial Real Estate		627,335		24,260		24,260
Commercial Construction, Land Development, and Other Land		3,828,871		-		-
Other Non Owner-Occupied Commercial Real Estate		12,500,772		-		-
Direct Financing Leases		784,398		-		-
Residential Real Estate		496,979		-		-
Installment and Other Consumer		48,652		-		-
	$	25,471,677	$	38,516	$	38,516

Total Impaired Loans/Leases:
Commercial and Industrial	$	8,914,017	$	14,256	$	14,256
Commercial Real Estate
Owner-Occupied Commercial Real Estate		1,943,708		24,260		24,260
Commercial Construction, Land Development, and Other Land		5,626,377		-		-
Other Non Owner-Occupied Commercial Real Estate		13,862,422		-		-
Direct Financing Leases		1,696,735		-		-
Residential Real Estate		1,509,608		-		-
Installment and Other Consumer		1,047,543		-		-
	$	34,600,410	$	38,516	$	38,516

Impaired loans/leases for which no allowance has been provided have adequate collateral, based on management’s current estimates.

Part I

Item 1

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)-continued

Information for impaired loans/leases by classes of financing receivable as of December 31, 2011 is as follows:

Classes of Loans/Leases	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance

Impaired Loans/Leases with No Specific Allowance Recorded:
Commercial and Industrial	$	360,947	$	979,901	$	-
Commercial Real Estate
Owner-Occupied Commercial Real Estate		736,610		736,610		-
Commercial Construction, Land Development, and Other Land		-		-		-
Other Non Owner-Occupied Commercial Real Estate		3,936,826		3,986,820		-
Direct Financing Leases		1,094,178		1,094,178		-
Residential Real Estate		788,685		862,298		-
Installment and Other Consumer		593,987		593,987		-
	$	7,511,233	$	8,253,794	$	-

Impaired Loans/Leases with Specific Allowance Recorded:
Commercial and Industrial	$	1,791,908	$	1,791,908	$	903,187
Commercial Real Estate
Owner-Occupied Commercial Real Estate		217,059		217,059		47,911
Commercial Construction, Land Development, and Other Land		9,051,455		9,051,455		3,002,450
Other Non Owner-Occupied Commercial Real Estate		10,339,415		10,839,415		1,247,377
Direct Financing Leases		212,485		212,485		66,675
Residential Real Estate		344,789		344,789		55,884
Installment and Other Consumer		390,819		390,819		22,819
	$	22,347,930	$	22,847,930	$	5,346,303

Total Impaired Loans/Leases:
Commercial and Industrial	$	2,152,855	$	2,771,809	$	903,187
Commercial Real Estate
Owner-Occupied Commercial Real Estate		953,669		953,669		47,911
Commercial Construction, Land Development, and Other Land		9,051,455		9,051,455		3,002,450
Other Non Owner-Occupied Commercial Real Estate		14,276,241		14,826,235		1,247,377
Direct Financing Leases		1,306,663		1,306,663		66,675
Residential Real Estate		1,133,474		1,207,087		55,884
Installment and Other Consumer		984,806		984,806		22,819
	$	29,859,163	$	31,101,724	$	5,346,303

Impaired loans/leases for which no allowance has been provided have adequate collateral, based on management’s current estimates.

Part I

Item 1

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)-continued

For each class of financing receivable, the following presents the recorded investment by credit quality indicator as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

	As of March 31, 2012
			Commercial Real Estate
					Non Owner-Occupied
Internally Assigned Risk Rating	Commercial and Industrial		Owner-Occupied Commercial Real Estate		Commercial Construction, Land Development, and Other Land		Other Commercial Real Estate		Total

Pass (Ratings 1 through 5)	$	328,755,702	$	174,905,504	$	39,557,845	$	308,585,328	$	851,804,379
Special Mention (Rating 6)		5,039,559		4,744,199		647,499		10,643,329		21,074,586
Substandard (Rating 7)		18,953,466		2,624,756		10,501,037		28,736,204		60,815,463
Doubtful (Rating 8)		-		-		-		-		-
	$	352,748,727	$	182,274,459	$	50,706,381	$	347,964,861	$	933,694,428

	As of March 31, 2012
Delinquency Status *	Direct Financing Leases		Residential Real Estate		Installment and Other Consumer		Total

Performing	$	95,593,483	$	102,384,641	$	74,440,259	$	272,418,383
Nonperforming		720,731		1,143,251		1,105,928		2,969,910
	$	96,314,214	$	103,527,892	$	75,546,187	$	275,388,293

*Performing = loans/leases accruing and less than 90 days past due. Nonperforming = loans/leases on nonaccrual, accruing loans/leases that are greater than or equal to 90 days past due, and accruing troubled debt restructurings.

	As of December 31, 2011
			Commercial Real Estate
					Non Owner-Occupied
Internally Assigned Risk Rating	Commercial and Industrial		Owner-Occupied Commercial Real Estate		Commercial Construction, Land Development, and Other Land		Other Commercial Real Estate		Total

Pass (Ratings 1 through 5)	$	324,225,905	$	158,955,618	$	46,268,554	$	310,401,972	$	839,852,049
Special Mention (Rating 6)		8,814,497		2,700,496		764,586		13,754,798		26,034,377
Substandard (Rating 7)		17,753,876		6,134,507		13,351,598		25,471,721		62,711,702
Doubtful (Rating 8)		-		-		-		-		-
	$	350,794,278	$	167,790,621	$	60,384,738	$	349,628,491	$	928,598,128

	As of December 31, 2011
Delinquency Status *	Direct Financing Leases		Residential Real Estate		Installment and Other Consumer		Total

Performing	$	91,905,699	$	96,973,576	$	77,126,064	$	266,005,339
Nonperforming		1,306,663		1,133,475		1,097,016		3,537,154
	$	93,212,362	$	98,107,051	$	78,223,080	$	269,542,493

Part I

Item 1

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)-continued

For commercial and industrial and commercial real estate loans, the Company’s credit quality indicator is internally assigned risk ratings. Each commercial loan is assigned a risk rating upon origination. The risk rating is reviewed every 15 months, at a minimum, and on an as needed basis depending on the specific circumstances of the loan.

For direct financing leases, residential real estate loans, and installment and other consumer loans, the Company’s credit quality indicator is performance determined by delinquency status. Delinquency status is updated daily by the Company’s loan system.

As of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, troubled debt restructurings totaled $19,645,204 and $20,526,457, respectively.

For each class of financing receivable, the following presents the number and recorded investment of troubled debt restructurings, by type of concession, that were restructured during the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011.

	For the three months ended March 31, 2012								For the three months ended March 31, 2011
Classes of Loans/Leases	Number of Loans / Leases		Pre-Modification Recorded Investment		Post-Modification Recorded Investment		Specific Allowance		Number of Loans / Leases		Pre-Modification Recorded Investment		Post-Modification Recorded Investment		Specific Allowance

CONCESSION - Significant payment delay
Commercial and Industrial		-	$	-	$	-	$	-		4	$	1,175,819	$	1,175,819	$	-
Commercial Construction, Land Development, and Other Land		2		200,000		200,000		144,000		-		-		-		-
		2	$	200,000	$	200,000	$	144,000		4	$	1,175,819	$	1,175,819	$	-

CONCESSION - Interest rate adjusted below market
Commercial Construction, Land Development, and Other Land		1	$	337,500	$	337,500	$	-		-	$	-	$	-	$	-
Residential Real Estate		1		167,739		167,739		-		-		-		-		-
Installment and Other Consumer		1		16,043		16,043		-		-		-		-		-
		3	$	521,282	$	521,282	$	-		-	$	-	$	-	$	-

TOTAL		5	$	721,282	$	721,282	$	144,000		4	$	1,175,819	$	1,175,819	$	-

Of the troubled debt restructurings reported above, two with post-modification recorded investments totaling $200,000 were on nonaccrual as of March 31, 2012. None of the troubled debt restructurings reported above had partial charge-offs.

For the three months ended March 31, 2012, none of the Company’s troubled debt restructurings has redefaulted within 12 months subsequent to restructure where default is defined as delinquency of 90 days or more and/or placement on nonaccrual status.

Part I

Item 1

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)-continued

NOTE 4 - EARNINGS PER SHARE

The following information was used in the computation of earnings per share on a basic and diluted basis:

	Three months ended March 31,
	2012		2011

Net income	$	3,402,849	$	2,231,484
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		166,031		106,524
Net income attributable to QCR Holdings, Inc.	$	3,236,818	$	2,124,960

Less: Preferred stock dividends and discount accretion		938,625		1,032,371
Net income attributable to QCR Holdings, Inc. common stockholders	$	2,298,193	$	1,092,589

Earnings per common share attributable to QCR Holdings, Inc. common stockholders
Basic	$	0.48	$	0.23
Diluted	$	0.48	$	0.23

Weighted average common shares outstanding		4,800,407		4,671,715
Weighted average common shares issuable upon exercise of stock options and under the employee stock purchase plan		32,992		12,002
Weighted average common and common equivalent shares outstanding		4,833,399		4,683,717

NOTE 5 – BUSINESS SEGMENT INFORMATION

Selected financial and descriptive information is required to be disclosed for reportable operating segments, applying a “management perspective” as the basis for identifying reportable segments. The management perspective is determined by the view that management takes of the segments within the Company when making operating decisions, allocating resources, and measuring performance. The segments of the Company have been defined by the structure of the Company’s internal organization, focusing on the financial information that the Company’s operating decision-makers routinely use to make decisions about operating matters.

The Company’s primary segment, Commercial Banking, is geographically divided by markets into the secondary segments which are the three subsidiary banks wholly-owned by the Company: QCBT, CRBT, and RB&T. Each of these secondary segments offer similar products and services, but are managed separately due to different pricing, product demand, and consumer markets. Each offers commercial, consumer, and mortgage loans and deposit services.

The Company’s Wealth Management segment represents the trust and asset management and investment management and advisory services offered at the Company’s three subsidiary banks in aggregate. This segment generates income primarily from fees charged based on assets under administration for corporate and personal trusts, custodial services, and investments managed. No assets of the subsidiary banks have been allocated to the Wealth Management segment.

Part I

Item 1

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)-continued

The Company’s All Other segment includes the operations of all other consolidated subsidiaries and/or defined operating segments that fall below the segment reporting thresholds. This segment includes the corporate operations of the parent company and the 91% owned real estate holding operations of VPHC.

Selected financial information on the Company’s business segments is presented as follows for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011.

	Commercial Banking
	Quad City Bank & Trust		Cedar Rapids Bank & Trust		Rockford Bank & Trust		Wealth Management		All Other			Intercompany Eliminations			Consolidated Total
Three Months Ended March 31, 2012
Total revenue	$	12,265,033	$	6,586,149	$	3,120,795	$	1,405,194	$	4,611,992		$	(4,658,481	)	$	23,330,682
Net interest income	$	8,389,042	$	3,767,999	$	2,432,706	$	-	$	(386,294	)	$	-		$	14,203,453
Net income attributable to QCR Holdings, Inc.	$	2,689,684	$	1,267,266	$	393,475	$	159,883	$	3,296,364		$	(4,569,854	)	$	3,236,818
Total assets	$	1,114,376,297	$	566,158,474	$	312,595,782	$	-	$	198,977,794		$	(199,110,154	)	$	1,992,998,193
Provision for loan/lease losses	$	395,446	$	350,000	$	35,000	$	-	$	-		$	-		$	780,446
Goodwill	$	3,222,688	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-		$	-		$	3,222,688

Three Months Ended March 31, 2011
Total revenue	$	11,955,808	$	7,062,606	$	3,281,980	$	1,482,020	$	3,518,243		$	(3,592,301	)	$	23,708,356
Net interest income	$	6,996,360	$	3,762,123	$	2,078,105	$	-	$	(627,786	)	$	-		$	12,208,802
Net income attributable to QCR Holdings, Inc.	$	1,663,305	$	1,234,424	$	223,131	$	291,388	$	2,184,258		$	(3,471,546	)	$	2,124,960
Total assets	$	1,045,160,644	$	557,998,653	$	272,274,718	$	-	$	184,352,751		$	(186,092,652	)	$	1,873,694,114
Provision for loan/lease losses	$	439,664	$	375,000	$	253,000	$	-	$	-		$	-		$	1,067,664
Goodwill	$	3,222,688	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-		$	-		$	3,222,688

NOTE 6 – FAIR VALUE

The measurement of fair value under U.S. GAAP uses a hierarchy intended to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. This hierarchy includes three levels and is based upon the valuation techniques used to measure assets and liabilities. The three levels are as follows:

Level 1 – Inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in markets;

Level 2 – Inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument; and

Level 3 – Inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.

There were no transfers of assets or liabilities between Levels 1, 2, and 3 of the fair value hierarchy for the three months ended March 31, 2012 or 2011.

Part I

Item 1

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)-continued

Assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis comprise the following at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

			Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
	Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)

March 31, 2012:
Securities available for sale:
U.S. govt. sponsored agency securities	$	432,169,493	$	-	$	432,169,493	$	-
Residential mortgage-backed and related securities		128,532,589		-		128,532,589		-
Municipal securities		53,811,823		-		53,811,823		-
Trust preferred securities		104,000		-		104,000		-
Other securities		1,572,610		221,798		1,350,812		-
	$	616,190,515	$	221,798	$	615,968,717	$	-

December 31, 2011:
Securities available for sale:
U.S. govt. sponsored agency securities	$	428,955,220	$	-	$	428,955,220	$	-
Residential mortgage-backed and related securities		108,853,749		-		108,853,749		-
Municipal securities		25,689,364		-		25,689,364		-
Trust preferred securities		80,800		-		80,800		-
Other securities		1,450,158		191,506		1,258,652		-
	$	565,029,291	$	191,506	$	564,837,785	$	-

A small portion of the securities available for sale portfolio consists of common stock issued by various unrelated bank holding companies. The fair values used by the Company are obtained from an independent pricing service and represent quoted market prices for the identical securities (Level 1 inputs).

The large majority of the securities available for sale portfolio consists of U.S. government sponsored agency securities for which the Company obtains fair values from an independent pricing service. The fair values are determined by pricing models that consider observable market data, such as interest rate volatilities, LIBOR yield curve, credit spreads and prices from market makers and live trading systems (Level 2 inputs).

Part I

Item 1

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)-continued

Certain financial assets are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis; that is, the assets are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis but are subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances (for example, when there is evidence of impairment).

Assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis comprise the following at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

			Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
	Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
March 31, 2012:
Impaired loans/leases	$	18,610,807	$	-	$	-	$	18,610,807
Other real estate owned		8,825,945		-		-		8,825,945
	$	27,436,752	$	-	$	-	$	27,436,752

December 31, 2011:
Impaired loans/leases	$	18,361,757	$	-	$	-	$	18,361,757
Other real estate owned		9,056,619		-		-		9,056,619
	$	27,418,376	$	-	$	-	$	27,418,376

Impaired loans/leases are evaluated and valued at the time the loan/lease is identified as impaired, at the lower of cost or fair value and are classified as a Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. Fair value is measured based on the value of the collateral securing these loans/leases. Collateral may be real estate and/or business assets, including equipment, inventory and/or accounts receivable, and is determined based on appraisals by qualified licensed appraisers hired by the Company. Appraised and reported values may be discounted based on management’s historical knowledge, changes in market conditions from the time of valuation, and/or management’s expertise and knowledge of the client and client’s business.

Other real estate owned in the table above consists of property acquired through foreclosures and settlements of loans. Property acquired is carried at the lower of the principal amount of loans outstanding, or the estimated fair value of the property, less disposal costs, and is classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.

For the impaired loans/leases and other real estate owned, the Company records carrying value at fair value less disposal or selling costs. The amounts reported in the tables above are fair values before the adjustment for disposal or selling costs.

There have been no changes in valuation techniques used for any assets measured at fair value during the three months ended March 31, 2012 or 2011.

Part I

Item 1

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)-continued

The following table presents the carrying values and estimated fair values of financial assets and liabilities carried on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets, including those financial assets and liabilities that are not measured and reported at fair value on a recurring basis or non-recurring basis:

	As of March 31, 2012				As of December 31, 2011
	Carrying Value		Estimated Fair Value		Carrying Value		Estimated Fair Value

Cash and due from banks	$	39,239,858	$	39,239,858	$	53,136,710	$	53,136,710
Federal funds sold		-		-		20,785,000		20,785,000
Interest-bearing deposits at financial institutions		25,488,213		25,488,213		26,750,602		26,750,602
Investment securities:
Held to maturity		200,000		200,000		200,000		200,000
Available for sale		616,190,515		616,190,515		565,029,291		565,029,291
Loans/leases receivable, net		1,192,722,787		1,212,237,000		1,181,956,235		1,202,817,000
Accrued interest receivable		6,886,434		6,886,434		6,510,021		6,510,021
Deposits		1,296,749,133		1,300,317,000		1,205,457,788		1,209,197,000
Short-term borrowings		149,900,500		149,900,500		213,536,450		213,536,450
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		203,750,000		221,454,000		204,750,000		223,678,000
Other borrowings		136,233,688		151,306,000		136,231,663		151,813,000
Junior subordinated debentures		36,085,000		18,637,000		36,085,000		18,444,000
Accrued interest payable		1,580,359		1,580,359		1,551,842		1,551,842

The methodologies for estimating the fair value of financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring or non-recurring basis are discussed above. For certain financial assets and liabilities, carrying value approximates fair value due to the nature of the financial instrument. These instruments include: cash and due from banks, federal funds sold, interest-bearing deposits at financial institutions, accrued interest receivable and payable, demand and other non-maturity deposits, and short-term borrowings. The Company used the following methods and assumptions in estimating the fair value of the following instruments:

Loans/leases receivable: The fair values for variable rate loans equal their carrying values. The fair values for all other types of loans/leases are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, using interest rates currently being offered for loans/leases with similar terms to borrowers with similar credit quality. The fair value of loans held for sale is based on quoted market prices of similar loans sold on the secondary market. All of the above is classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy as presented in the table below.

Deposits: The fair values disclosed for demand and other non-maturity deposits equal their carrying amounts, which represent the amount payable on demand. Fair values for time deposits are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered on time deposits to a schedule of aggregate expected monthly maturities on time deposits, and are classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy as presented in the table below.

Part I

Item 1

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)-continued

Federal Home Loan Bank advances and junior subordinated debentures: The fair value of these instruments is estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, based on the Company’s current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements, and are classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy as presented in the table below.

Other borrowings: The fair value for the wholesale repurchase agreements and fixed rate other borrowings is estimated using rates currently available for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities. The fair value for variable rate other borrowings is equal to its carrying value. All of the above are classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy as presented in the table below.

Commitments to extend credit: The fair value of these instruments is not material.

The following table presents the level in the fair value hierarchy for the estimated fair values of only the Company’s financial instruments that are not already on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at fair value at March 31, 2012.

	Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3


Loans/leases receivable, net *	$	1,193,626,193	$	-	$	1,193,626,193	$	-
Time deposits		353,462,000		-		353,462,000		-
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		221,454,000		-		221,454,000		-
Other borrowings		151,306,000		-		151,306,000		-
Junior subordinated debentures		18,637,000		-		18,637,000		-

*Excludes impaired loans/leases totaling $18,610,807 measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis and reported separately.

Part I

Item 2

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

GENERAL

QCR Holdings, Inc. is the parent company of Quad City Bank & Trust, Cedar Rapids Bank & Trust, and Rockford Bank & Trust.

Quad City Bank & Trust and Cedar Rapids Bank & Trust are Iowa-chartered commercial banks, and Rockford Bank & Trust is an Illinois-chartered commercial bank. All are members of the Federal Reserve System with depository accounts insured to the maximum amount permitted by law by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”).

Quad City Bank & Trust commenced operations in 1994 and provides full-service commercial and consumer banking, and trust and asset management services, to the Quad City area and adjacent communities through its five offices that are located in Bettendorf and Davenport, Iowa and Moline, Illinois. Quad City Bank & Trust also provides leasing services through its 80%-owned subsidiary, m2 Lease Funds, located in Brookfield, Wisconsin. In addition, Quad City Bank & Trust owns 100% of Quad City Investment Advisors, LLC (formerly known as CMG Investment Advisors, LLC), which is an investment management and advisory company.

Cedar Rapids Bank & Trust commenced operations in 2001 and provides full-service commercial and consumer banking, and trust and asset management services, to Cedar Rapids, Iowa and adjacent communities through its main office located on First Avenue in downtown Cedar Rapids, Iowa and its branch facility located on Council Street in northern Cedar Rapids. Cedar Rapids Bank & Trust also provides residential real estate mortgage lending services through its 50%-owned joint venture, Cedar Rapids Mortgage Company.

Rockford Bank & Trust commenced operations in January 2005 and provides full-service commercial and consumer banking, and trust and asset management services, to Rockford, Illinois and adjacent communities through its main office located in downtown Rockford and its branch facility on Guilford Road at Alpine Road in Rockford.

The Company engages in real estate holdings through its 91% equity investment in Velie Plantation Holding Company, LLC, based in Moline, Illinois.

Part I

Item 2

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – continued

OVERVIEW

The Company recognized net income of $3.4 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2012, and net income attributable to QCR Holdings, Inc. of $3.2 million, which excludes the net income attributable to noncontrolling interests of $166 thousand. After preferred stock dividends of $939 thousand, the Company reported net income attributable to common stockholders of $2.3 million, or diluted earnings per common share of $0.48. By comparison, for the quarter ended December 31, 2011, the Company recognized net income of $2.9 million and net income attributable to QCR Holdings, Inc. of $2.7 million, which excludes the net income attributable to noncontrolling interests of $130 thousand. After preferred stock dividends of $1.0 million, the Company reported net income attributable to common stockholders of $1.7 million, or diluted earnings per common share of $0.35. For the first quarter of 2011, the Company recognized net income of $2.2 million and net income attributable to QCR holdings, Inc. of $2.1 million, which excludes the net income attributable to noncontrolling interests of $106 thousand. After preferred stock dividends and discount accretion of $1.0 million, the Company reported net income attributable to common stockholders of $1.1 million, or diluted earnings per common share of $0.23.

Following is a table that represents the various net income measurements for the three months ended March 31, 2012, December 31, 2011, and March 31, 2011, respectively.

	For the three months ended
	March 31, 2012		December 31, 2011		March 31, 2011

Net income	$	3,402,849	$	2,858,570	$	2,231,484
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		166,031		130,006		106,524
Net income attributable to QCR Holdings, Inc.	$	3,236,818	$	2,728,564	$	2,124,960

Less: Preferred stock dividends and discount accretion		938,625		1,027,714		1,032,371
Net income attributable to QCR Holdings, Inc. common stockholders	$	2,298,193	$	1,700,850	$	1,092,589

Diluted earnings per common share	$	0.48	$	0.35	$	0.23

Weighted average common and common equivalent shares outstanding		4,833,399		4,856,296		4,683,717

Following is a table that represents the major income and expense categories.

	For the three months ended
	March 31, 2012			December 31, 2011			March 31, 2011

Net interest income	$	14,203,453		$	14,156,295		$	12,208,802
Provision for loan/lease losses		(780,446	)		(1,419,164	)		(1,067,664	)
Noninterest income		3,956,878			3,896,066			5,057,124
Noninterest expense		(12,738,080	)		(12,651,685	)		(13,012,271	)
Federal and state income tax		(1,238,956	)		(1,122,942	)		(954,507	)
Net income	$	3,402,849		$	2,858,570		$	2,231,484

Part I

Item 2

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – continued

NET INTEREST INCOME

Net interest income, on a tax equivalent basis, increased $2.1 million, or 17%, to $14.4 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2012, from $12.3 million for the same period of 2011. For the first quarter of 2012, average earning assets increased $97.8 million, or 6%, while average interest-bearing liabilities grew slightly, when compared with average balances for the first quarter of 2011. Primarily funding the growth in average earnings assets, average noninterest-bearing deposits grew $96.7 million, or 33%, from the first quarter 2011 to the same period of 2012. A comparison of yields, spread and margin from the first quarter of 2012 to the first quarter of 2011 is as follows (on a tax equivalent basis):

The average yield on interest-earning assets decreased 3 basis points.

The average cost of interest-bearing liabilities decreased 35 basis points.

The net interest spread improved 32 basis points from 2.44% to 2.76%.

The net interest margin improved 31 basis points from 2.78% to 3.09%.

Although net interest margin grew sharply over the year and despite a slight increase in net interest income quarter-over-quarter, net interest margin is down 9 basis points from 3.18% for the quarter ended December 31, 2011. The quarter-over-quarter decline in net interest margin was primarily the result of carrying higher levels of excess liquidity as deposit growth continued to outpace loan growth.

The Company’s management closely monitors and manages net interest margin. From a profitability standpoint, an important challenge for the Company’s subsidiary banks and majority-owned leasing company is the improvement of their net interest margins. Management continually addresses this issue with pricing and other balance sheet management strategies. Over the past year, the Company’s management has emphasized shifting its funding mix by reducing its reliance on wholesale funding which tends to be at a higher cost than deposits. In addition, with loan growth continuing to be modest, the Company’s management has focused on growing and diversifying its securities portfolio.

The Company’s average balances, interest income/expense, and rates earned/paid on major balance sheet categories, as well as the components of change in net interest income, are presented in the following tables:

Part I

Item 2

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – continued

	For the three months ended March 31,
	2012								2011
	Average Balance			Interest Earned or Paid		Average Yield or Cost			Average Balance			Interest Earned or Paid		Average Yield or Cost
	(dollars in thousands)
ASSETS
Interest earning assets:
Federal funds sold	$	-		$	-		0.00	%	$	120,474		$	66		0.22	%
Interest-bearing deposits at financial institutions		84,367			120		0.57	%		39,339			111		1.13	%
Investment securities (1)		576,530			3,391		2.37	%		447,352			2,693		2.41	%
Restricted investment securities		15,280			81		2.13	%		16,260			164		4.03	%
Gross loans/leases receivable (2) (3) (4)		1,198,047			15,971		5.36	%		1,152,997			15,735		5.46	%

Total interest earning assets	$	1,874,224			19,563		4.20	%	$	1,776,422			18,769		4.23	%

Noninterest-earning assets:
Cash and due from banks	$	41,021							$	38,685
Premises and equipment		31,670								30,959
Less allowance for estimated losses on loans/leases		(18,911	)							(20,508	)
Other		76,738								66,302

Total assets	$	2,004,742							$	1,891,860

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing demand deposits	$	500,234			737		0.59	%	$	475,355			970		0.82	%
Savings deposits		41,002			7		0.07	%		36,577			15		0.16	%
Time deposits		345,800			972		1.13	%		368,701			1,440		1.56	%
Short-term borrowings		178,981			65		0.15	%		144,537			114		0.32	%
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		206,137			1,864		3.64	%		225,894			2,143		3.79	%
Junior subordinated debentures		36,085			268		2.99	%		36,085			481		5.33	%
Other borrowings (4)		135,898			1,257		3.72	%		148,592			1,279		3.44	%

Total interest-bearing liabilities	$	1,444,137			5,170		1.44	%	$	1,435,741			6,442		1.79	%

Noninterest-bearing demand deposits	$	390,021							$	293,285
Other noninterest-bearing liabilities		26,761								31,536
Total liabilities	$	1,860,919							$	1,760,562

Stockholders' equity		143,823								131,298

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	2,004,742							$	1,891,860

Net interest income				$	14,393							$	12,327

Net interest spread							2.76	%							2.44	%

Net interest margin							3.09	%							2.78	%

Ratio of average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities		129.78	%							123.73	%

(1) Interest earned and yields on nontaxable investment securities are determined on a tax equivalent basis using a 34% tax rate for each period presented.

(2) Loan/lease fees are not material and are included in interest income from loans/leases receivable in accordance with accounting and regulatory guidance.

(3) Non-accrual loans/leases are included in the average balance for gross loans/leases receivable in accordance with accounting and regulatory guidance.

(4) In accordance with ASC 860, effective January 1, 2010, the Company accounts for some participations sold, including sales of SBA-guaranteed portions of loans during the recourse period, as secured borrowings. As such, these amounts are included in the average balance for gross loans/leases receivable and other borrowings. For the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, this totaled $0.0 million and $8.5 million, respectively. During the second quarter of 2011, SBA removed the recourse provision for sales which allowed for sale accounting treatment at the time of sale; thus, the decline in average balance.

Part I

Item 2

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – continued

Analysis of Changes of Interest Income/Interest Expense

For the three months ended March 31, 2012

	Inc./(Dec.)			Components
	from			of Change (1)
	Prior Period			Rate			Volume
	2012 vs. 2011
	(dollars in thousands)
INTEREST INCOME
Federal funds sold	$	(66	)	$	(33	)	$	(33	)
Interest-bearing deposits at financial institutions		9			(303	)		312
Investment securities (2)		698			(316	)		1,014
Restricted investment securities		(83	)		(73	)		(10	)
Gross loans/leases receivable (3) (4) (5)		236			(1,465	)		1,701

Total change in interest income	$	794		$	(2,190	)	$	2,984

INTEREST EXPENSE
Interest-bearing demand deposits	$	(233	)	$	(537	)	$	304
Savings deposits		(8	)		(18	)		10
Time deposits		(468	)		(382	)		(86	)
Short-term borrowings		(49	)		(185	)		136
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		(279	)		(90	)		(189	)
Junior subordinated debentures		(213	)		(213	)		-
Other borrowings (5)		(22	)		413			(435	)

Total change in interest expense	$	(1,272	)	$	(1,012	)	$	(260	)

Total change in net interest income	$	2,066		$	(1,178	)	$	3,244

(1) The column "Inc./(Dec.) from Prior Period" is segmented into the changes attributable to variations in volume and the changes attributable to changes in interest rates. The variations attributable to simultaneous volume and rate changes have been proportionately alloctaed to rate and volume.

(2) Interest earned and yields on nontaxable investment securities are determined on a tax equivalent basis using a 34% tax rate for each period presented.

(3) Loan/lease fees are not material and are included in interest income from loans/leases receivable in accordance with accounting and regulatory guidance.

(4) Non-accrual loans/leases are included in the average balance for gross loans/leases receivable in accordance with accounting and regulatory guidance.

(5) In accordance with ASC 860, effective January 1, 2010, the Company accounts for some participations sold, including sales of SBA-guaranteed portions of loans during the recourse period, as secured borrowings. As such, these amounts are included in the average balance for gross loans/leases receivable and other borrowings. For the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, this totaled $0.0 million and $8.5 million, respectively. During the second quarter of 2011, SBA removed the recourse provision for sales which allowed sale accounting treatment at the time of sale; thus, the decline in average balance.

Part I

Item 2

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – continued

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The Company’s financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The financial information contained within these statements is, to a significant extent, financial information that is based on approximate measures of the financial effects of transactions and events that have already occurred.

Based on its consideration of accounting policies that involve the most complex and subjective decisions and assessments, management has identified its most critical accounting policy to be that related to the allowance for estimated losses on loans/leases. The Company’s allowance for estimated losses on loans/leases methodology incorporates a variety of risk considerations, both quantitative and qualitative, in establishing an allowance for estimated losses on loans/leases that management believes is appropriate at each reporting date. Quantitative factors include the Company’s historical loss experience, delinquency and charge-off trends, collateral values, changes in nonperforming loans/leases, and other factors. Quantitative factors also incorporate known information about individual loans/leases, including borrowers’ sensitivity to interest rate movements. Qualitative factors include the general economic environment in the Company’s markets, including economic conditions throughout the Midwest, and in particular, the state of certain industries. Size and complexity of individual credits in relation to loan/lease structure, existing loan/lease policies and pace of portfolio growth are other qualitative factors that are considered in the methodology. Management may report a materially different amount for the provision for loan/lease losses in the statement of operations to change the allowance for estimated losses on loans/leases if its assessment of the above factors were different. This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the Company’s financial statements and the accompanying notes presented elsewhere herein, as well as the portion in the section entitled “Financial Condition” of this Management’s Discussion and Analysis that discusses the allowance for estimated losses on loans/leases. Although management believes the level of the allowance as of March 31, 2012 is adequate to absorb losses inherent in the loan/lease portfolio, a decline in local economic conditions, or other factors, could result in increasing losses that cannot be reasonably predicted at this time.

The Company’s assessment of other-than-temporary impairment of its available-for-sale securities portfolio is another critical accounting policy as a result of the level of judgment required by management. Available-for-sale securities are evaluated to determine whether declines in fair value below their cost are other-than-temporary. In estimating other-than-temporary impairment losses, management considers a number of factors including, but not limited to, (1) the length of time and extent to which the fair value has been less than amortized cost, (2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, (3) the current market conditions, and (4) the intent of the Company to not sell the security prior to recovery and whether it is not more-likely-than-not that the Company will be required to sell the security prior to recovery. The discussion regarding the Company’s assessment of other-than-temporary impairment should be read in conjunction with the Company’s financial statements and the accompanying notes presented elsewhere herein.

Part I

Item 2

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – continued

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

INTEREST INCOME

Interest income grew $722 thousand, or 4%, from $18.7 million for the first quarter of 2011 to $19.4 million for the first quarter of 2012. Growth in loans/leases and securities more than offset the effect of declines in yields. Specifically, over the year, the average balance for loans/leases grew $45.1 million, or 4%, while loan yields declined 10 basis points. Considering the challenging economic and competitive lending landscape, these results are favorable. As deposit growth continues to outpace loan growth, the Company has focused on growing and diversifying its securities portfolio, including increasing its portfolio of agency-sponsored mortgage-backed securities as well as investing in municipalities. As a result, over the year, the average balance for securities grew $129.2 million, or 29%, while yields declined modestly by 4 basis points. With the extended historical low interest rate environment, management’s execution on diversification of the securities portfolio helped limit the yield fluctuation to only a modest decline.

Interest income for the current quarter fell slightly from the prior quarter. Loan yields declined 10 basis points quarter-over-quarter which offset modest loan growth as well as the impact of continued growth and diversification of the securities portfolio. Management understands the importance of quality, well-priced loan/lease growth and has worked hard to grow assets in a prudent and sustainable manner.

INTEREST EXPENSE

Interest expense for the first quarter of 2012 declined $314 thousand, or 6%, from prior quarter, and fell significantly by $1.3 million, or 20%, from the first quarter of 2011. The average balances of interest-bearing deposits were relatively flat over the year, while the cost of deposits fell from 1.10% for the first quarter of 2011 to 0.90% for the fourth quarter of 2011, and down further to 0.78% for the first quarter of 2012. As the Company continues to grow noninterest bearing deposits (the average balances increased $96.7 million, or 33%, over the year), this has provided management increased flexibility to manage down pricing on its interest-bearing deposits. Also contributing to the decline in interest expense, the Company has been successful in managing down the cost of borrowings. Management has placed a strong focus on reducing the reliance on wholesale funding as it tends to be higher cost than deposits. Over the year, the majority of maturing wholesale funds have not been replaced, or, to a lesser extent, have been replaced at significantly reduced cost. In addition, management executed on two separate strategies during 2011 which strongly contributed to the declining borrowing costs:

During the first quarter of 2011, QCBT utilized excess liquidity and prepaid $15.0 million of FHLB advances with a weighted average interest rate of 4.87% and a weighted average maturity of May 2012.

The Company modified $33.4 million ($20.4 million in first quarter of 2011 and $13.0 million in the fourth quarter of 2011) of fixed rate FHLB advances into new fixed rate FHLB advances at significantly reduced interest rates and extended maturities.

Part I

Item 2

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – continued

PROVISION FOR LOAN/LEASE LOSSES

The provision for loan/lease losses is established based on a number of factors, including the Company’s historical loss experience, delinquencies and charge-off trends, the local and national economy and risk associated with the loans/leases in the portfolio as described in more detail in the “Critical Accounting Policies” section.

The Company’s provision for loan/lease losses totaled $780 thousand for the first quarter of 2012, a decline of $639 thousand over the prior quarter, and a decline of $288 thousand from the first quarter of 2011. The declines were the result of the following:

The Company continued to experience improving loan quality as evidenced by the declining trend in the level of classified and criticized loans (see table and further discussion in the “Financial Condition” section). This trend translated over to nonperforming loans/leases as the Company’s level of nonperforming loans/leases declined from $35.7 million at March 31, 2011 down to $32.0 million at December 31, 2011, and down further to $30.6 million at March 31, 2012.

The Company experienced modest growth and a slight shift in mix in its loan/lease portfolio. Specifically, loans/leases grew $56.0 million, or 5%, with approximately half of the growth in residential real estate loans and direct financing leases, which have smaller average balances and are historically less risky than the Company’s commercial loan portfolio.

With net charge-offs totaling $563 thousand more than offset by provision for loan/lease losses of $780 thousand, the Company’s allowance for estimated losses on loan/lease losses to total loans/leases increased to 1.57% at March 31, 2012 from 1.56% at December 31, 2011. A more detailed discussion of the Company’s allowance for estimated losses on loans/leases can be found in the “Financial Condition” section of this report.

Part I

Item 2

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – continued

NONINTEREST INCOME

The following tables set forth the various categories of noninterest income for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011.

	Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2012			March 31, 2011			$ Change			% Change

Trust department fees	$	883,732		$	950,802		$	(67,070	)		(7.1	) %
Investment advisory and management fees, gross		521,462			531,218			(9,756	)		(1.8	)
Deposit service fees		904,406			872,672			31,734			3.6
Gains on sales of loans, net		399,090			759,693			(360,603	)		(47.5	)
Securities gains		-			880,312			(880,312	)		(100.0	)
Losses on sales of other real estate owned, net		(189,204	)		(25,098	)		(164,106	)		653.9
Earnings on bank-owned life insurance		438,402			344,411			93,991			27.3
Credit card fees, net of processing costs		127,015			141,160			(14,145	)		(10.0	)
Other		871,975			601,954			270,021			44.9
	$	3,956,878		$	5,057,124		$	(1,100,246	)		(21.8	) %

Trust department fees continue to be a significant contributor to noninterest income. Trust department fees declined 7% from the first quarter of 2011 to the first quarter of 2012. Comparing the first quarter of 2012 to the fourth quarter of 2011, trust department fees grew 16%. The majority of the trust department fees are determined based on the value of the investments within the managed trusts. As markets have experienced volatility with the national economy’s recovery from recession, the Company’s fee income has experienced similar volatility and fluctuation. In recent years, the Company has been successful in expanding its customer base which has helped to offset some of the volatility.

Over the past year, the Company has placed a stronger emphasis on growing its investment advisory and management services. Fee income for investment advisory and management services was relatively flat comparing first quarter of 2011 to the same quarter of 2012, and increased 9% from the fourth quarter of 2011 to the current quarter. Similar to trust department fees, these fees are largely determined based on the value of the investments managed. And, similar to the trust department, the Company has had some success in expanding its customer base which has helped to offset the market volatility affecting asset values as the national economy continues to slowly recover.

Deposit service fees have increased over the past several years. The Company has placed an emphasis on shifting the mix of deposits from brokered and retail time deposits to non-maturity demand deposits. With this shift in mix, the Company has increased the number of demand deposit accounts which tend to be lower in interest cost and higher in service fees. The Company plans to continue this shift in mix and to focus on growing deposit service fees.

Part I

Item 2

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – continued

Gains on sales of loans, net, declined 48% from first quarter of 2011 to the same period in 2012. This consists of sales of residential mortgages and the government guaranteed portions of small business loans. Following is the breakdown of the gains recognized for these types of sales for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011.

	For the three months ended
	March 31, 2012		March 31, 2011
Gains on sales of residential mortgages	$	291,433	$	132,229
Gains on sales of government guaranteed portions of loans		107,657		627,464
	$	399,090	$	759,693

Regarding sales of residential mortgages, the sales volume was relatively flat comparing the first quarter of 2012 to the same period in 2011. It appears the real estate markets are slowly recovering as buying and selling activity has increased which has offset the declining refinancing activity. This shift in mix is favorable as the Company typically earns higher premiums on the former. In addition, the Company has focused on improving its premiums per transaction with careful selection and negotiation with its portfolio of investors (purchasers of the residential mortgages) without sacrificing quality or increasing recourse exposure. Despite the decline in gains on sales of government guaranteed portions of loans from the first quarter of 2011 to the first quarter of 2012, the Company continues to place a strong focus on small business lending by taking advantage of programs offered by the Small Business Administration and United States Department of Agriculture. In some cases, it is more beneficial for the Company to sell the government guaranteed portion at a premium. The Company will continue to focus on growing small business lending and selling the government guaranteed portion as it continues to be beneficial.

During the first quarter of 2011, in an effort to offset the $832 thousand of fees for prepaying $15.0 million of FHLB advances, QCBT sold $37.4 million of government agency securities for a pre-tax gain totaling $880 thousand.

Included in ‘other’ noninterest income, CRBT recognized $207 thousand of fee income for the execution of interest rate swaps related to two commercial loans during the first quarter of 2012. The interest rate swaps allow the commercial borrowers to pay a fixed interest rate while CRBT receives a variable interest rate. Management believes that these swaps help position CRBT better for rising rate environments.

Part I

Item 2

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – continued

NONINTEREST EXPENSE

The following table sets forth the various categories of noninterest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011.

	Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2012		March 31, 2011		$ Change			% Change

Salaries and employee benefits	$	8,124,680	$	7,473,503	$	651,177			8.7	%
Occupancy and equipment expense		1,352,263		1,289,455		62,808			4.9
Professional and data processing fees		1,150,190		1,124,522		25,668			2.3
FDIC and other insurance		580,856		882,730		(301,874	)		(34.2	)
Loan/lease expense		218,734		276,228		(57,494	)		(20.8	)
Advertising and marketing		276,016		224,729		51,287			22.8
Postage and telephone		288,240		230,185		58,055			25.2
Stationery and supplies		142,966		134,643		8,323			6.2
Bank service charges		199,729		161,178		38,551			23.9
Prepayment fees on Federal Home Loan Bank advances		-		832,099		(832,099	)		(100.0	)
Other		404,406		382,999		21,407			5.6
	$	12,738,080	$	13,012,271	$	(274,191	)		(2.1	) %

Salaries and employee benefits, which is the largest component of noninterest expense, increased $651 thousand, or 9%, from the first quarter of 2011 to the same quarter of 2012. This increase is largely the result of:

Customary annual salary and benefits increases for the majority of the Company’s employee base in 2012.

Continued increases in health insurance-related employee benefits for the majority of the Company’s employee base.

Higher accrued incentive compensation based on improved performance for the first quarter of 2012.

An increase in the Company’s employee base as full-time equivalents increased from 347 at March 31, 2011 to 349 at March 31, 2012. Specifically, the Company added three business development officers in the Wealth Management division in an effort to continue to grow market share.

FDIC and other insurance expense decreased 34% from the first quarter of 2011 to the first quarter of 2012. FDIC insurance premiums are calculated using a variety of factors, including, but not limited to, balance sheet levels, funding mix, and regulatory compliance. The subsidiary banks have been successful in managing these factors and driving down FDIC insurance cost. In addition, the FDIC modified the calculation for premiums effective during the second quarter of 2011. The modification was favorable for the Company’s subsidiary banks.

Loan/lease expense declined $57 thousand, or 21%, from the first quarter of 2011 to the first quarter of 2012. Generally, loan/lease expense has a direct relationship with the level of nonperforming loans/leases; however, it may deviate as it depends upon the individual nonperforming loans/leases. Over the past few years, the Company has experienced elevated levels of loan/lease expense.

Part I

Item 2

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – continued

The Company incurred additional expenses for advertising and marketing in the first quarter of 2012. Specifically, the subsidiary banks and the leasing company are pursuing opportunities to reach new customers in their respective markets as a result of the continued uncertainty with some of their competition.

Bank service charges, which include costs incurred to provide services to QCBT’s correspondent banking customer portfolio, have increased over the year. The increase is due, in large part, to the success QCBT has had in growing its correspondent banking customer portfolio over the past year.

In an effort to utilize some of its excess liquidity and improve net interest margin by eliminating some of its higher cost wholesale funding, QCBT prepaid $15.0 million of FHLB advances during the first quarter of 2011. As a result, QCBT incurred a prepayment fee totaling $832 thousand. To offset these fees, QCBT sold $37.4 million of government sponsored agency securities for a pre-tax gain totaling $880 thousand.

INCOME TAXES

The provision for income taxes totaled $1.2 million, or an effective tax rate of 27%, for the first quarter of 2012 compared to $955 thousand, or an effective tax rate of 30%, for the same quarter in 2011. The increase in provision for income taxes is the result of significant growth in income before taxes which is discussed previously throughout this Management’s Discussion and Analysis. Regarding the decline in the effective tax rate, this is primarily the result of the following:

The continued application of tax credits that were acquired in the third quarter of 2011.

The increase in tax-exempt municipal securities during the first quarter of 2012. Specifically, the Company grew its municipal securities portfolio from $25.7 million at December 31, 2011 to $53.8 million at March 31, 2012.

Part I

Item 2

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – continued

FINANCIAL CONDITION

Following is a table that represents the major categories of the Company’s balance sheet.

	As of
	March 31, 2012					December 31, 2011					March 31, 2011

	(dollars in thousands)

	Amount		%			Amount		%			Amount		%
Cash, federal funds sold, and interest-bearing deposits	$	64,728		3	%	$	100,673		5	%	$	133,374		7	%
Securities		616,391		31	%		565,229		29	%		491,558		26	%
Net loans/leases		1,192,723		60	%		1,181,956		60	%		1,135,038		61	%
Other assets		119,156		6	%		118,752		6	%		113,724		6	%
Total assets	$	1,992,998		100	%	$	1,966,610		100	%	$	1,873,694		100	%

Total deposits	$	1,296,749		65	%	$	1,205,458		61	%	$	1,194,858		64	%
Total borrowings		525,970		26	%		590,603		30	%		524,837		28	%
Other liabilities		24,512		1	%		26,116		1	%		21,041		1	%
Total stockholders' equity		145,767		7	%		144,433		7	%		132,958		7	%
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	1,992,998		100	%	$	1,966,610		100	%	$	1,873,694		100	%

During the first quarter of 2012, the Company’s total assets increased 1% from $1.97 billion at December 31, 2011 to $1.99 billion at March 31, 2012. The Company continued to grow its securities portfolio with 9% growth during the current quarter. Additionally, the Company experienced net growth of loan/leases in the amount of $10.8 million, or 1%, over the first quarter of 2012. The growth was partially offset by a decline in federal funds sold and interest-bearing deposits at financial institutions as the Company invested some of its excess liquidity. The net increase in assets during the first quarter of 2012 was funded by strong and continued growth of the Company’s deposit portfolio as balances grew $91.3 million, or 8%.

The composition of the Company’s securities portfolio is managed to meet liquidity needs while prioritizing the impact on asset-liability position and maximizing return. With the strong growth in deposits and the continued weak loan demand, the Company has grown and diversified its securities portfolio, including increasing the portfolio of agency-sponsored mortgage-backed securities as well as more than doubling the portfolio of municipalities. As the portfolio has grown over the recent years, management has elevated its focus on maximizing return while minimizing credit and interest rate risk.

Part I

Item 2

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – continued

Following is a breakdown of the Company’s securities portfolio by type:

	As of
	March 31, 2012					December 31, 2011					March 31, 2011
	Amount		%			Amount		%			Amount		%
	(dollars in thousands)
U.S. govt. sponsored agency securities	$	432,169		70	%	$	428,955		76	%	$	388,459		79	%
Residential mortgage-backed and related securities		128,533		21	%		108,854		19	%		73,180		15	%
Municipal securities		53,813		9	%		25,689		5	%		27,922		6	%
Other securities, including held-to-maturity		1,876		0	%		1,731		0	%		1,997		0	%
	$	616,391		100	%	$	565,229		100	%	$	491,558		100	%

The Company has not invested in commercial mortgage-backed securities or pooled trust preferred securities.

See Note 2 for additional information regarding the Company’s investment securities.

Total loans/leases grew $10.9 million, or 1%, during the first quarter of 2012. Although the growth continues to be modest, this marked the fourth consecutive quarter of net loan/lease growth. The mix of the loan/lease types within the Company’s loan/lease portfolio is presented in the following table.

	As of
	March 31, 2012						December 31, 2011						March 31, 2011
	Amount			%			Amount			%			Amount			%

	(dollars in thousands)

Commercial and industrial loans	$	352,749			29	%	$	350,794			29	%	$	357,471			31	%
Commercial real estate loans		580,946			48	%		577,804			48	%		549,771			48	%
Direct financing leases		96,314			8	%		93,212			8	%		83,994			7	%
Residential real estate loans		103,528			9	%		98,107			8	%		79,708			7	%
Installment and other consumer loans		75,546			6	%		78,223			7	%		82,855			7	%

Total loans/leases	$	1,209,083			100	%	$	1,198,140			100	%	$	1,153,799			100	%

Plus deferred loan/lease origination costs, net of fees		2,647						2,605						1,969
Less allowance for estimated losses on loans/leases		(19,007	)					(18,789	)					(20,730	)

Net loans/leases	$	1,192,723					$	1,181,956					$	1,135,038

Regarding the Company’s levels of qualified small business lending as defined by the U.S. Treasury as part of the Company’s participation in the Small Business Lending Fund (“SBLF”), see the discussion later in this section of the Management’s Discussion and Analysis.

Part I

Item 2

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – continued

As commercial real estate loans are the largest portfolio segment, management places a strong emphasis on monitoring the composition of the Company’s commercial real estate loan portfolio. Management tracks the level of owner-occupied commercial real estate loans versus non owner-occupied loans. Owner-occupied loans are generally considered to have less risk. As of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, approximately 31% and 29%, respectively, of the commercial real estate loan portfolio was owner-occupied. Although the net growth of commercial real estate loans was modest for the first quarter of 2012, there was a favorable shift in mix as owner-occupied grew $14.5 million, or 9%, while non owner-occupied (including commercial construction and land development) declined $11.3 million, or 3%.

Following is a listing of significant industries within the Company’s commercial real estate loan portfolio as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

	As of March 31, 2012					As of December 31, 2011
	Amount		%			Amount		%

	(dollars in thousands)

Lessors of Nonresidential Buildings	$	169,886		29	%	$	179,511		31	%
Lessors of Residential Buildings		48,919		8	%		50,029		9	%
Land Subdivision		33,486		6	%		33,252		6	%
Hotels		23,700		4	%		19,061		3	%
New Car Dealers		21,817		4	%		25,223		4	%
Lessors of Other Real Estate Property		15,115		3	%		15,830		3	%
Other *		268,023		46	%		254,898		44	%

Total Commercial Real Estate Loans	$	580,946		100	%	$	577,804		100	%

* “Other” consists of all other industries. None of these had concentrations greater than $15 million, or 2.6% of total commercial real estate loans.

The Company’s residential real estate loan portfolio consists of the following:

Certain loans that do not meet the criteria for sale into the secondary market. These are often structured as adjustable rate mortgages with maturities ranging from three to seven years to avoid the long-term interest rate risk.

A limited amount of 15-year fixed rate residential real estate loans that met certain credit guidelines.

The remaining residential real estate loans originated by the Company were sold on the secondary market to avoid the interest rate risk associated with longer term fixed rate loans. Loans originated for this purpose were classified as held for sale and are included in the residential real estate loans above. In addition, the Company has not originated any subprime, Alt-A, no documentation, or stated income residential real estate loans throughout its history.

See Note 3 for additional information regarding the Company’s loan/lease portfolio.

Part I

Item 2

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – continued

Changes in the allowance for estimated losses on loans/leases for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 are presented as follows:

	Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2012			March 31, 2011

Balance, beginning	$	18,789,262		$	20,364,656
Provisions charged to expense		780,446			1,067,664
Loans/leases charged off		(824,752	)		(880,927	)
Recoveries on loans/leases previously charged off		261,688			178,623
Balance, ending	$	19,006,644		$	20,730,016

The allowance for estimated losses on loans/leases was $19.0 million at March 31, 2012 compared to $18.8 million at December 31, 2011 and $20.7 million at March 31, 2011. The allowance for estimated losses on loans/leases was determined based on factors that included the overall composition of the loan/lease portfolio, types of loans/leases, past loss experience, loan/lease delinquencies, potential substandard and doubtful credits, economic conditions, collateral positions, governmental guarantees and other factors that, in management’s judgment, deserved evaluation. To ensure that an adequate allowance was maintained, provisions were made based on a number of factors, including the increase/decrease in loans/leases and a detailed analysis of the loan/lease portfolio. The loan/lease portfolio was reviewed and analyzed monthly with specific detailed reviews completed on all loans risk-rated worse than “fair quality” and carrying aggregate exposure in excess of $100 thousand. The adequacy of the allowance for estimated losses on loans/leases was monitored by the loan review staff and reported to management and the board of directors.

The Company continued to strengthen its core loan portfolio as the levels of criticized and classified loans declined further in the first quarter of 2012, as reported in the following table.

	As of
Internally Assigned Risk Rating *	March 31, 2012		December 31, 2011		December 31, 2010

	(dollars in thousands)

Special Mention (Rating 6)	$	21,075	$	26,034	$	43,551
Substandard (Rating 7) - Performing		34,457		36,278		42,498
Substandard (Rating 7) - Nonperforming		26,358		26,434		32,612
Doubtful (Rating 8)		-		-		21
	$	81,890	$	88,746	$	118,682


Criticized Loans **	$	81,890	$	88,746	$	118,682
Classified Loans ***	$	60,815	$	62,712	$	75,131

* Amounts above exclude the government guaranteed portion, if any. The Company assigns internal risk ratings of Pass (Rating 2) for the government guaranteed portion.

** Criticized loans are defined as commercial and industrial and commercial real estate loans with internally assigned risk ratings of 6, 7, or 8, regardless of performance.

*** Classified loans are defined as commercial and industrial and commercial real estate loans with internally assigned risk ratings of 7 or 8, regardless of performance.

Part I

Item 2

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – continued

The declining trend in criticized and classified loans over the past several quarters translated to a reduction in nonperforming loans/leases and that trend continued during the first quarter as nonperforming loans/leases fell $1.4 million, or 4%. Furthermore, nonperforming loans/leases have declined $16.7 million, or 35%, from their peak at September 30, 2010. As a direct result, the level of allowance has declined. Notably, the decline in nonperforming loans/leases has outpaced the decline in allowance for estimated losses on loans/leases and strengthened the Company’s allowance to nonperforming loans/leases. The following table summarizes the trend in allowance as a percentage of gross loans/leases and as a percentage of nonperforming loans/leases as of March 31, 2012, December 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010.

	As of
	March 31, 2012			December 31, 2011			December 31, 2010


Allowance / Gross Loans/Leases		1.57	%		1.56	%		1.74	%
Allowance / Nonperforming Loans/Leases *		62.11	%		58.70	%		49.49	%

*Nonperforming loan/leases consist of nonaccrual loans/leases, accruing loans/leases past due 90 days or more, and accruing troubled debt restructurings.

Although management believes that the allowance for estimated losses on loans/leases at March 31, 2012 was at a level adequate to absorb losses on existing loans/leases, there can be no assurance that such losses will not exceed the estimated amounts or that the Company will not be required to make additional provisions for loan/lease losses in the future. Unpredictable future events could adversely affect cash flows for both commercial and individual borrowers, which could cause the Company to experience increases in problem assets, delinquencies and losses on loans/leases, and require further increases in the provision. Asset quality is a priority for the Company and its subsidiaries. The ability to grow profitably is in part dependent upon the ability to maintain that quality. The Company continually focuses efforts at its subsidiary banks and leasing company with the intention to improve the overall quality of the Company’s loan/lease portfolio.

See Note 3 for additional information regarding the Company’s allowance for estimated losses on loans/leases.

Part I

Item 2

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – continued

The table below presents the amounts of nonperforming assets.

	As of March 31, 2012			As of December 31, 2011			As of March 31, 2011			As of December 31, 2010

	(dollars in thousands)

Nonaccrual loans/leases (1) (2)	$	19,013		$	18,995		$	32,156		$	37,427
Accruing loans/leases past due 90 days or more		721			1,111			123			320
Troubled debt restructures - accruing		10,868			11,904			3,379			3,405
Other real estate owned		8,172			8,386			8,358			8,535
Other repossessed assets		125			109			219			366
	$	38,899		$	40,505		$	44,235		$	50,053

Nonperforming loans/leases to total loans/leases		2.53	%		2.67	%		3.09	%		3.51	%
Nonperforming assets to total loans/leases plus reposessed property		3.19	%		3.35	%		3.80	%		4.24	%
Nonperforming assets to total assets		1.95	%		2.06	%		2.36	%		2.73	%
Texas ratio (3)		24.34	%		25.58	%		29.61	%		33.57	%

(1)

Includes government guaranteed portion of loan.

(2)

Includes troubled debt restructurings of $8.8 million at March 31, 2012, $8.6 million at December 31, 2011, $8.4 million at March 31, 2011, and $12.6 million at December 31, 2010.

(3)

Texas Ratio = Nonperforming Assets (excluding Other Repossessed Assets) / Tangible Equity plus Allowance for Estimated Losses on Loans/Leases. Texas Ratio is a non-GAAP financial measure. Management included this ratio as this is considered to be a critical metric with which to analyze and evaluate asset quality. Other companies may calculate this ratio differently.

The large majority of the nonperforming assets consist of nonaccrual loans/leases, accruing troubled debt restructurings, and other real estate owned. For nonaccrual loans/leases and accruing troubled debt restructurings, management has thoroughly reviewed these loans/leases and has provided specific allowances as appropriate. Other real estate owned is carried at the fair value less costs to sell.

Nonperforming assets at March 31, 2012 were $38.9 million which is a decline of $1.6 million, or 4%, from December 31, 2011. Further, nonperforming assets have declined $20.5 million, or 35%, from their peak position of $59.4 million at September 30, 2010. A combination of improved performance ($781 thousand) and charge-offs ($825 thousand) contributed to the decline during the first quarter of 2012.

Part I

Item 2

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – continued

Deposits grew $91.3 million, or 8%, during the first quarter of 2012. The table below presents the composition of the Company’s deposit portfolio.

	As of
	March 31, 2012					December 31, 2011					March 31, 2011

	(dollars in thousands)

	Amount		%			Amount		%			Amount		%
Noninterest bearing demand deposits	$	385,806		30	%	$	357,184		30	%	$	281,237		24	%
Interest bearing demand deposits		519,732		40	%		470,807		39	%		521,042		44	%
Savings deposits		41,317		3	%		39,981		3	%		37,689		3	%
Time deposits		297,737		23	%		292,575		24	%		307,151		26	%
Brokered time deposits		52,157		4	%		44,911		4	%		47,739		4	%
	$	1,296,749		100	%	$	1,205,458		100	%	$	1,194,858		100	%

The Company has been successful in growing its noninterest bearing deposit portfolio over the past few years and this continued into the first quarter of 2012 with an increase of $28.6 million, or 8%. Most of this growth continues to derive from QCBT’s correspondent banking business. The continued strength of the noninterest bearing deposit portfolio has provided flexibility to manage down deposit pricing and reduce reliance on higher cost wholesale funds which has helped drive down the Company’s interest expense.

The subsidiary banks offer short-term repurchase agreements to some of their significant customers. Also, the subsidiary banks purchase federal funds for short-term funding needs from the Federal Reserve Bank or from their correspondent banks. The table below presents the composition of the Company’s short-term borrowings.

	As of
	March 31, 2012		December 31, 2011		March 31, 2011

	(dollars in thousands)

Overnight repurchase agreements with customers	$	107,910	$	110,236	$	117,901
Federal funds purchased		41,990		103,300		16,971
	$	149,900	$	213,536	$	134,872

The Company’s federal funds purchased position was temporarily elevated at December 31, 2011, as a result of short-term fluctuations in noninterest bearing correspondent deposit balances for several customers over the end of the year.

As a result of their memberships in either the FHLB of Des Moines or Chicago, the subsidiary banks have the ability to borrow funds for short or long-term purposes under a variety of programs. FHLB advances are utilized for loan matching as a hedge against the possibility of rising interest rates, and when these advances provide a less costly or more readily available source of funds than customer deposits. FHLB advances decreased slightly by $1.0 million during the first quarter of 2012.

Part I

Item 2

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – continued

Other borrowings consist largely of structured wholesale repurchase agreements which are utilized as an alternative funding source to FHLB advances and customer deposits. The table below presents the composition of the Company’s other borrowings.

	As of
	March 31, 2012		December 31, 2011		March 31, 2011

	(dollars in thousands)

Wholesale repurchase agreements	$	130,000	$	130,000	$	135,000
364-day revolving note		3,600		3,600		2,500
Series A subordinated notes		2,634		2,632		2,626
Other		-		-		3,504
	$	136,234	$	136,232	$	143,630

It is management’s intention to continue to reduce the reliance on wholesale funding, including FHLB advances, wholesale structured repurchase agreements, and brokered time deposits. Replacement of this funding with core deposits helps to reduce interest expense as the wholesale funding tends to be higher funding cost.

The table below presents the composition of the Company’s stockholders’ equity, including the common and preferred equity components.

	As of
	March 31, 2012						December 31, 2011						March 31, 2011
	Amount			%			Amount			%			Amount			%

	(dollars in thousands)

Common stock	$	4,945					$	4,879					$	4,834
Additional paid in capital - common		26,705						26,381						24,644
Retained earnings		46,884						44,586						41,644
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		3,237						4,755						(641	)
Noncontrolling interests		2,216						2,052						1,753
Less: Treasury stock		(1,606	)					(1,606	)					(1,606	)
Total common stockholders' equity		82,381			57	%		81,047			56	%		70,628			53	%

Preferred stock		65						65						63
Additional paid in capital - preferred		63,321						63,321						62,267
Total preferred stockholders' equity		63,386			43	%		63,386			44	%		62,330			47	%

Total stockholders' equity	$	145,767			100	%	$	144,433			100	%	$	132,958			100	%

Tangible common equity* / total tangible assets		3.86	%					3.85	%					3.51	%

*Tangible common equity is defined as total common stockholders’ equity excluding equity of noncontrolling interests and excluding goodwill and other intangibles. This ratio is a non-GAAP financial measure. Management included this ratio as it is considered by many investors and analysts to be a metric with which to analyze and evaluate the equity composition. Other companies may calculate this ratio differently.

Part I

Item 2

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – continued

The following table presents the details of the preferred stock issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2012.

	Date Issued	Aggregate Purchase Price		Stated Dividend Rate			Annual Dividend

Series E Non-Cumulative Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock	June 2010	$	25,000,000		7.00	%	$	1,750,000
Series F Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock	September 2011		40,090,000		5.00	%		2,004,500
		$	65,090,000				$	3,754,500

Regarding the Series F Preferred Stock, non-cumulative dividends are payable quarterly, and the dividend rate is based on changes in the level of “Qualified Small Business Lending” or “QSBL” by the Company’s wholly owned bank subsidiaries, QCBT, CRBT and RB&T. Based upon the change in the banks’ level of QSBL over the baseline level (defined below), the dividend rate remained at 5% through the first quarter of 2012.

As of March 31, 2012, the Company reported its QSBL in accordance with SBLF guidelines and calculated a net decline from the baseline of $69.5 million, or 15%. SBLF defines the baseline as the average of the Company’s QSBL for the last two quarters of 2009 and the first two quarters of 2010. As a result of the decline, the dividend rate on the Series F Preferred Stock remains at 5%. Although the Company grew business loans modestly during the first quarter of 2012, some of these loans didn’t meet the SBLF’s specific definition for QSBL. Although the Company continues to experience a net decline in QSBL since the baseline, it continues to supportsmall businesses in its communities. One example of this support is through its significant participation in the SBA and USDA lending programs. Notably, for 2011, all three of the subsidiary banks were ranked in the top 10 in their respective states for SBA lending volume. CRBT was ranked first in the state of Iowa for both SBA and USDA lending volume. The government guaranteed portions of these loans (typically 70% to 85% of the total principal balance) do not qualify as QSBL, as defined by SBLF guidelines. Through continued participation in these programs and the efforts of the Company’s experienced small business bankers, the Company is well positioned to continue to support the lending needs of small businesses in the communities it serves.

Stockholders’ equity increased $1.3 million, or 1%, during the first quarter of 2012. Net income of $3.4 million grew retained earnings; however, this was partially offset by declaration of preferred stock dividends totaling $939 thousand ($438 thousand for Series E Preferred Stock, and $501 thousand for Series F Preferred Stock). Lastly, the available for sale portion of the securities portfolio experienced a decline in fair value of $1.5 million, net of tax, for the first quarter of 2012 as a result of increases in certain market interest rates.

Part I

Item 2

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – continued

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Liquidity measures the ability of the Company to meet maturing obligations and its existing commitments, to withstand fluctuations in deposit levels, to fund its operations, and to provide for customers’ credit needs. The Company monitors liquidity risk through contingency planning stress testing on a regular basis. The Company seeks to avoid over concentration of funding sources and to establish and maintain contingent funding facilities that can be drawn upon if normal funding sources become unavailable. One source of liquidity is cash and short-term assets, such as interest-bearing deposits in other banks and federal funds sold, which averaged $125.4 million for the first quarter of 2012 and $112.9 million for the fourth quarter of 2011.

The Company has a variety of sources of short-term liquidity available, including federal funds purchased from correspondent banks, FHLB advances, structured wholesale repurchase agreements, brokered certificates of deposit, lines of credit, borrowing at the Federal Reserve Discount Window, sales of securities available for sale, and loan/lease participations or sales. The Company also generates liquidity from the regular principal payments and prepayments made on its loan/lease portfolio, and on the regular monthly payments on its residential mortgage-backed securities portfolio. At March 31, 2012, the subsidiary banks had 26 lines of credit totaling $281.3 million, of which $65.3 million was secured and $216.0 million was unsecured. At March 31, 2012, all of the $281.3 million was available. Additionally, the Company has a single $20.0 million secured revolving line of credit with a maturity date of April 1, 2013. As of March 31, 2012, the Company had $16.4 million available as the line of credit carried an outstanding balance of $3.6 million.

Throughout its history, the Company has secured additional capital through various resources, including the issuance of preferred stock (discussed above) and the issuance of trust preferred securities. Trust preferred securities are reported on the Company’s balance sheet as liabilities, but do qualify for treatment as regulatory capital.

The following table presents the details of the trust preferred securities issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2012.

Name	Date Issued	Amount Issued	Interest Rate	Interest Rate as of 3/31/12	Interest Rate as of 12/31/11

QCR Holdings Statutory Trust II	February 2004	$12,372,000	2.85% over 3-month LIBOR	3.43%	3.22%
QCR Holdings Statutory Trust III	February 2004	8,248,000	2.85% over 3-month LIBOR	3.43%	3.22%
QCR Holdings Statutory Trust IV	May 2005	5,155,000	1.80% over 3-month LIBOR	2.37%	2.20%
QCR Holdings Statutory Trust V	February 2006	10,310,000	1.55% over 3-month LIBOR	2.12%	1.95%
		$36,085,000	Weighted Average Rate	2.90%	2.71%

Part I

Item 2

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – continued

The Company (on a consolidated basis) and the subsidiary banks are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company and subsidiary banks’ financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Company and the subsidiary banks must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of their assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors. Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Company and the subsidiary banks to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the following table) of total and Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets and of Tier 1 capital to average assets, each as defined by regulation. Management believes, as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, that the Company and the subsidiary banks met all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject.

Under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, to be categorized as “well capitalized,” an institution must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier 1 risk-based and Tier 1 leverage ratios as set forth in the following tables. The Company and the subsidiary banks’ actual capital amounts and ratios as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 are also presented in the following table (dollars in thousands). As of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the subsidiary banks met the requirements to be “well capitalized”.

	Actual					For Capital Adequacy Purposes					To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions
	Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio
As of March 31, 2012:
Company:
Total risk-based capital	$	194,560		13.87	%	$	112,187	>	8.0	%		N/A		N/A
Tier 1 risk-based capital		172,052		12.27	%		56,094	>	4.0	%		N/A		N/A
Tier 1 leverage		172,052		8.60	%		80,059	>	4.0	%		N/A		N/A
Quad City Bank & Trust:
Total risk-based capital	$	101,596		13.27	%	$	61,260	>	8.0	%	$	76,575	>	10.00	%
Tier 1 risk-based capital		93,403		12.20	%		30,630	>	4.0			45,945	>	6.00	%
Tier 1 leverage		93,403		8.25	%		45,266	>	4.0			56,582	>	5.00	%
Cedar Rapids Bank & Trust:
Total risk-based capital	$	57,647		14.62	%	$	31,542	>	8.0	%	$	47,312	>	10.00	%
Tier 1 risk-based capital		52,696		13.37	%		15,771	>	4.0			23,656	>	6.00	%
Tier 1 leverage		52,696		9.13	%		23,088	>	4.0			28,860	>	5.00	%
Rockford Bank & Trust:
Total risk-based capital	$	36,642		15.14	%	$	19,366	>	8.0	%	$	24,207	>	10.00	%
Tier 1 risk-based capital		33,603		13.88	%		9,683	>	4.0			14,524	>	6.00	%
Tier 1 leverage		33,603		11.01	%		12,207	>	4.0			15,259	>	5.00	%

Part I

Item 2

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – continued

	Actual					For Capital Adequacy Purposes					To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions
	Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio
As of December 31, 2011:
Company:
Total risk-based capital	$	191,419		13.84	%	$	110,686	>	8.0	%		N/A		N/A
Tier 1 risk-based capital		169,360		12.24	%		55,343	>	4.0	%		N/A		N/A
Tier 1 leverage		169,360		8.70	%		77,857	>	4.0	%		N/A		N/A
Quad City Bank & Trust:
Total risk-based capital	$	98,382		13.03	%	$	60,391	>	8.0	%	$	75,488	>	10.00	%
Tier 1 risk-based capital		90,336		11.97	%		30,195	>	4.0			45,293	>	6.00	%
Tier 1 leverage		90,336		8.21	%		44,009	>	4.0			55,012	>	5.00	%
Cedar Rapids Bank & Trust:
Total risk-based capital	$	56,312		14.44	%	$	31,198	>	8.0	%	$	38,998	>	10.00	%
Tier 1 risk-based capital		51,415		13.18	%		15,599	>	4.0			23,399	>	6.00	%
Tier 1 leverage		51,415		9.02	%		22,807	>	4.0			28,509	>	5.00	%
Rockford Bank & Trust:
Total risk-based capital	$	36,259		15.27	%	$	19,001	>	8.0	%	$	23,752	>	10.00	%
Tier 1 risk-based capital		33,277		14.01	%		9,501	>	4.0			14,251	>	6.00	%
Tier 1 leverage		33,277		11.31	%		11,770	>	4.0			14,713	>	5.00	%

Part I

Item 2

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – continued

SPECIAL NOTE CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Safe Harbor Statement Under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. This document (including information incorporated by reference) contains, and future oral and written statements of the Company and its management may contain, forward-looking statements, within the meaning of such term in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, with respect to the financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance and business of the Company. Forward-looking statements, which may be based upon beliefs, expectations and assumptions of the Company’s management and on information currently available to management, are generally identifiable by the use of words such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “bode,” “predict,” “suggest,” “project,” “appear,” “plan,” “intend,” “estimate,” “may,” “will,” “would,” “could,” “should,” “likely,” or other similar expressions. Additionally, all statements in this document, including forward-looking statements, speak only as of the date they are made, and the Company undertakes no obligation to update any statement in light of new information or future events.

The Company’s ability to predict results or the actual effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. The factors which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s operations and future prospects are detailed in the “Risk Factors” section included under Item 1.A. of Part I of the Company’s Form 10-K. In addition to the risk factors described in that section, there are other factors that may impact any public company, including the Company, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s operations and future prospects of the Company and its subsidiaries.

These risks and uncertainties should be considered in evaluating forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements.

Part I

Item 3

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATVE DISCUSSION ABOUT MARKET RISK

The Company, like other financial institutions, is subject to direct and indirect market risk. Direct market risk exists from changes in interest rates. The Company’s net income is dependent on its net interest income. Net interest income is susceptible to interest rate risk to the degree that interest-bearing liabilities mature or reprice on a different basis than interest-earning assets. When interest-bearing liabilities mature or reprice more quickly than interest-earning assets in a given period, a significant increase in market rates of interest could adversely affect net interest income. Similarly, when interest-earning assets mature or reprice more quickly than interest-bearing liabilities, falling interest rates could result in a decrease in net interest income.

In an attempt to manage the Company’s exposure to changes in interest rates, management monitors the Company’s interest rate risk. Each subsidiary bank has an asset/liability management committee of the board of directors that meets quarterly to review the bank’s interest rate risk position and profitability, and to make or recommend adjustments for consideration by the full board of each bank. Internal asset/liability management teams consisting of members of the subsidiary banks’ management meet weekly to manage the mix of assets and liabilities to maximize earnings and liquidity and minimize interest rate and other risks. Management also reviews the subsidiary banks’ securities portfolios, formulates investment strategies, and oversees the timing and implementation of transactions to assure attainment of the board's objectives in the most effective manner. Notwithstanding the Company’s interest rate risk management activities, the potential for changing interest rates is an uncertainty that can have an adverse effect on net income.

In adjusting the Company’s asset/liability position, the board of directors and management attempt to manage the Company’s interest rate risk while maintaining or enhancing net interest margins. At times, depending on the level of general interest rates, the relationship between long-term and short-term interest rates, market conditions and competitive factors, the board of directors and management may decide to increase the Company’s interest rate risk position somewhat in order to increase its net interest margin. The Company’s results of operations and net portfolio values remain vulnerable to increases in interest rates and to fluctuations in the difference between long-term and short-term interest rates.

One method used to quantify interest rate risk is a short-term earnings at risk summary, which is a detailed and dynamic simulation model used to quantify the estimated exposure of net interest income to sustained interest rate changes. This simulation model captures the impact of changing interest rates on the interest income received and interest expense paid on all interest sensitive assets and liabilities reflected on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet. This sensitivity analysis demonstrates net interest income exposure annually over a five-year horizon, assuming no balance sheet growth and various interest rate scenarios including no change in rates; 200, 300, 400, and 500 basis point upward shifts; and a 100 basis point downward shift in interest rates, where interest-bearing assets and liabilities reprice at their earliest possible repricing date. The model assumes parallel and pro rata shifts in interest rates over a twelve-month period for the 200 basis point upward shift and 100 basis point downward shift. For the 400 basis point upward shift, the model assumes a parallel and pro rata shift in interest rates over a twenty-four month period. For the 500 basis point upward shift, the model assumes a flattening and pro rata shift in interest rates over a twelve-month period where the short-end of the yield curve shifts upward greater than the long-end of the yield curve. Effective with the modeling for the second quarter of 2010, the Company added an interest rate scenario where interest rates experience a parallel and instantaneous shift upward 300 basis points. The asset/liability management committee of the board of directors has established policy limits of a 10% decline in net interest income for the 200 and the newly added 300 basis point upward shifts and the 100 basis point downward shift.

Part I

Item 3

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATVE DISCUSSION ABOUT MARKET RISK

Application of the simulation model analysis at the most recent quarter-end available demonstrated the following:

	NET INTEREST INCOME EXPOSURE in YEAR 1
INTEREST RATE SCENARIO	As of December 31, 2011			As of March 31, 2011			As of December 31, 2010

100 basis point downward shift		-1.5	%		-1.8	%		-1.9	%
200 basis point upward shift		-3.1	%		-3.6	%		-3.0	%
300 basis point upward shift		-4.2	%		-4.1	%		-1.6	%

The simulation is within the board-established policy limit of a 10% decline in net interest income for all three scenarios.

Interest rate risk is considered to be one of the most significant market risks affecting the Company. For that reason, the Company engages the assistance of a national consulting firm and its risk management system to monitor and control the Company’s interest rate risk exposure. Other types of market risk, such as foreign currency exchange rate risk and commodity price risk, do not arise in the normal course of the Company’s business activities.

Part I

Item 4

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Exchange Act) as of March 31, 2012. Based on that evaluation, the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports filed and submitted under the Exchange Act was recorded, processed, summarized and reported as and when required.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. There have been no significant changes to the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Part II

QCR HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1 Legal Proceedings

There are no material pending legal proceedings to which the Company or any of its subsidiaries is a party other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to their respective businesses.

Item 1.A. Risk Factors

There have been no material changes in the risk factors applicable to the Company from those disclosed in Part I, Item 1.A. “Risk Factors,” in the Company’s 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Please refer to that section of the Company’s Form 10-K for disclosures regarding the risks and uncertainties related to the Company’s business.

Item 2 Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

None

Item 3 Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None

Item 4 Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable

Item 5 Other Information

None

Part II

QCR HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION - continued

Item 6 Exhibits

31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a).

31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a).

32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101*

Interactive data files pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011; (ii) Consolidated Statements of Income for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and March 31, 2011; (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and March 31, 2011; (iv) Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and March 31, 2011; (v) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and March 31, 2011; and (vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of text.

* As provided in Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, this information shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Sections 11 and 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to liability under those sections.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

QCR HOLDINGS, INC.

(Registrant)

Date May 7, 2012		/s/ Douglas M. Hultquist
		Douglas M. Hultquist, President Chief Executive Officer


Date May 7, 2012		/s/ Todd A. Gipple
		Todd A. Gipple, Executive Vice President Chief Operating Officer Chief Financial Officer

QCR Holdings - 10-Q quarterly report FY2012 Q1

What is the market capitalization of a company?

DISCLAIMER

Contact

Links