Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2021
Commission file number: 000-33063
SIERRA BANCORP
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
California
33-0937517
(State of Incorporation)
(IRS Employer Identification No)
86 North Main Street, Porterville, California 93257
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(559) 782-4900
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Not Applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class
Trading
Symbol(s)
Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, no par value
BSRR
The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large Accelerated Filer
☐
Accelerated Filer:
☒
Non-accelerated Filer:
Smaller Reporting Company:
Emerging Growth Company:
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the Registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
As of November 1, 2021, the registrant had 15,410,784 shares of common stock outstanding, including 109,839 shares of unvested restricted stock.
Page
Part I - Financial Information
1
Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of Income
2
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
3
Consolidated Statements of Changes In Shareholders’ Equity
4
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
6
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
7
Item 2. Management’s Discussion & Analysis of Financial Condition & Results of Operations
34
Forward-Looking Statements
Critical Accounting Policies
35
Overview of the Results of Operations and Financial Condition
Earnings Performance
40
Net Interest Income and Net Interest Margin
41
Provision for Loan and Lease Losses
46
Noninterest Income and Noninterest Expense
48
Provision for Income Taxes
50
Balance Sheet Analysis
Earning Assets
Investments
Loan and Lease Portfolio
52
Nonperforming Assets
53
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses
55
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
57
Other Assets
Deposits and Interest Bearing Liabilities
Deposits
Other Interest Bearing Liabilities
58
Noninterest Bearing Liabilities
59
Liquidity and Market Risk Management
Capital Resources
63
Item 3. Qualitative & Quantitative Disclosures about Market Risk
64
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Part II - Other Information
65
Item 1. - Legal Proceedings
Item 1A. - Risk Factors
Item 2. - Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Item 3. - Defaults upon Senior Securities
Item 4. - Mine Safety Disclosures
Item 5. - Other Information
66
Item 6. - Exhibits
67
Signatures
68
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1 – Financial Statements
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(dollars in thousands)
September 30, 2021
December 31, 2020
ASSETS
(unaudited)
(audited)
Cash and due from banks
$
66,178
67,908
Interest bearing deposits in banks
356,172
3,509
Total cash & cash equivalents
422,350
71,417
Securities available-for-sale
732,312
543,974
Loans and leases:
Gross loans and leases
2,139,826
2,463,111
Deferred loan and lease fees, net
(2,612)
(3,147)
Allowance for loan and lease losses
(15,617)
(17,738)
Net loans and leases
2,121,597
2,442,226
Foreclosed assets
93
971
Premises and equipment, net
24,490
27,505
Goodwill
27,357
Other intangible assets, net
3,527
4,307
Bank-owned life insurance
55,023
52,539
Other assets
55,990
50,446
Total assets
3,442,739
3,220,742
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Deposits:
Noninterest bearing
1,111,411
943,664
Interest bearing
1,709,235
1,680,942
Total deposits
2,820,646
2,624,606
Repurchase agreements
92,553
39,138
Short-term borrowings
—
142,900
Long-term debt
49,221
Subordinated debentures
35,258
35,124
Other liabilities
80,554
35,078
Total liabilities
3,078,232
2,876,846
Commitments and contingent liabilities (Note 7)
Shareholders' equity
Common stock, no par value; 24,000,000 shares authorized; 15,382,518 and 15,388,423 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively
114,096
113,384
Additional paid-in capital
3,710
3,736
Retained earnings
231,717
208,371
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net
14,984
18,405
Total shareholders' equity
364,507
343,896
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2021 AND 2020
(dollars in thousands, except per share data, unaudited)
Three months ended September 30,
Nine months ended September 30,
2021
2020
Interest and dividend income
Loans and leases, including fees
24,226
25,742
75,555
69,538
Taxable securities
1,679
1,832
4,835
6,542
Tax-exempt securities
1,578
1,467
4,539
4,246
Federal funds sold and other
146
250
155
Total interest income
27,629
29,043
85,179
80,481
Interest expense
591
641
1,818
3,368
70
127
145
281
258
774
965
Total interest expense
913
969
2,719
4,478
Net interest income
26,716
28,074
82,460
76,003
(Benefit) provision for loan losses
(600)
2,350
(2,450)
6,350
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
27,316
25,724
84,910
69,653
Noninterest income
Service charges on deposits
3,186
2,950
8,677
8,752
Other income
4,349
4,155
12,300
11,360
Total noninterest income
7,535
7,105
20,977
20,112
Noninterest expense
Salaries and employee benefits
10,618
9,698
32,194
29,136
Occupancy and equipment
2,359
2,559
7,472
7,390
Other
7,898
7,046
21,715
18,630
Total noninterest expense
20,875
19,303
61,381
55,156
Income before taxes
13,976
13,526
44,506
34,609
Provision for income taxes
3,371
3,170
11,115
8,144
Net income
10,605
10,356
33,391
26,465
PER SHARE DATA
Book value
23.70
21.92
Cash dividends
0.22
0.20
0.65
0.60
Earnings per share basic
0.70
0.68
2.19
1.74
Earnings per share diluted
0.69
2.17
1.73
Average shares outstanding, basic
15,257,367
15,192,838
15,247,477
15,215,167
Average shares outstanding, diluted
15,343,543
15,387,309
15,369,249
15,422,647
Total shareholders' equity (in thousands)
336,247
Shares outstanding
15,382,518
15,341,723
Dividends paid (in thousands)
3,374
3,039
9,842
9,136
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(dollars in thousands, unaudited)
Other comprehensive (loss) income, before tax:
Unrealized gains on securities:
Unrealized holding (loss) gain arising during period
(576)
1,867
(4,846)
16,806
Less: reclassification adjustment for (losses) gains included in net income (1)
(11)
(390)
Other comprehensive (loss) income, before tax
(587)
(4,857)
16,416
Income tax (expense) benefit related to items of other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax
174
(552)
1,436
(4,854)
Other comprehensive (loss) income
(413)
1,315
(3,421)
11,562
Comprehensive income
10,192
11,671
29,970
38,027
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2021 AND 2020
Accumulated
Additional
Common Stock
Paid In
Retained
Comprehensive
Shareholders'
Shares
Amount
Capital
Earnings
Income (Loss)
Equity
Balance, June 30, 2020
112,645
3,462
195,147
16,179
327,433
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
Unvested restricted stock issued
148,885
Stock compensation costs
182
Cash dividends - $0.20 per share
(3,039)
Balance, September 30, 2020
3,644
202,464
17,494
Balance, June 30, 2021
15,410,763
113,453
4,190
224,689
15,397
357,729
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax
Exercise of stock options
3,320
732
(692)
Stock based compensation expense
(19,443)
212
Stock repurchase
(12,122)
(89)
(203)
(292)
Cash dividends - $0.22 per share
(3,374)
Balance, September 30, 2021
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2021 AND 2020
Balance, December 31, 2019
15,284,538
113,179
3,307
186,867
5,932
309,285
20,350
295
(80)
215
417
(112,050)
(829)
(1,732)
(2,561)
Cash dividends - $0.60 per share
(9,136)
Balance, December 31, 2020
15,388,423
7,480
801
(707)
94
(1,263)
681
Cash dividends - $0.65 per share
(9,842)
5
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Cash flows from operating activities:
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Gain on sales of securities
Gain on disposal of fixed assets
(146)
Gain on sale on foreclosed assets
(141)
(10)
Writedowns on foreclosed assets
332
Depreciation and amortization
2,585
2,276
Net amortization on securities premiums and discounts
3,654
3,528
Accretion of discounts for loans acquired and net deferred loan fees
(365)
(502)
Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance policies
(2,445)
(1,997)
Amortization of core deposit intangible
779
806
Increase in interest receivable and other assets
(497)
(17,046)
Decrease in other liabilities
46,587
6,418
Deferred income tax benefit
(2,702)
(275)
Increase in value of restricted bank equity securities
(857)
(447)
Net amortization of partnership investment
503
1,287
Net cash provided by operating activities
78,740
27,212
Cash flows from investing activities:
Maturities and calls of securities available for sale
5,800
9,585
Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale
148
20,298
Purchases of securities available for sale
(288,552)
(71,065)
Principal pay downs on securities available for sale
85,767
77,980
Net purchases of FHLB stock
(1,666)
Loan originations and payments, net
323,351
(614,676)
Purchases of premises and equipment
(345)
(1,923)
Proceeds from sale premises and equipment
1,055
Proceeds from sales of foreclosed assets
938
238
Purchase of bank-owned life insurance
(39)
(196)
Liquidation of bank-owned life insurance
326
Proceeds from BOLI death benefit
274
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
126,457
(579,159)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Increase in deposits
196,040
423,339
(Decrease) increase in borrowed funds
(142,900)
138,000
Increase in repurchase agreements
53,415
10,946
Cash dividends paid
Repurchases of common stock
Stock options exercised
Proceeds from issuance of subordinated debt
Net cash provided by financing activities
145,736
560,803
Increase in cash and cash equivalents
350,933
8,856
Cash and cash equivalents
Beginning of period
80,077
End of period
88,933
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Interest paid
2,702
5,067
Income taxes paid
11,769
10,050
Supplemental noncash disclosures:
Real estate acquired through foreclosure
2,563
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 1 – The Business of Sierra Bancorp
Sierra Bancorp (the “Company”) is a California corporation headquartered in Porterville, California, and is a registered bank holding company under federal banking laws. The Company was formed to serve as the holding company for Bank of the Sierra (the “Bank”), and has been the Bank’s sole shareholder since August 2001. The Company exists primarily for the purpose of holding the stock of the Bank and of such other subsidiaries it may acquire or establish. As of September 30, 2021, the Company’s only other subsidiaries were Sierra Statutory Trust II, Sierra Capital Trust III, and Coast Bancorp Statutory Trust II, which were formed solely to facilitate the issuance of capital trust pass-through securities (“TRUPS”). Pursuant to the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) standard on the consolidation of variable interest entities, these trusts are not reflected on a consolidated basis in the Company’s financial statements. References herein to the “Company” include Sierra Bancorp and its consolidated subsidiary, the Bank, unless the context indicates otherwise.
Bank of the Sierra, a California state-chartered bank headquartered in Porterville, California, offers a wide range of retail and commercial banking services via branch offices located throughout California’s South San Joaquin Valley, the Central Coast, Ventura County, the Sacramento area, and neighboring communities. The Bank was incorporated in September 1977, and opened for business in January 1978 as a one-branch bank with $1.5 million in capital. Our growth in the ensuing years has largely been organic in nature, but includes four whole-bank acquisitions: Sierra National Bank in 2000, Santa Clara Valley Bank in 2014, Coast National Bank in 2016, and Ojai Community Bank in October 2017. As of the filing date of this report the Bank operates 35 full-service branches and an online branch, and maintains ATMs at all but one of our branch locations as well as seven non-branch locations. Moreover, the Bank has specialized lending units which focus on agricultural borrowers, SBA loans, and mortgage warehouse lending. In addition, in February 2020 the bank opened a loan production office which is currently located in Roseville, CA. The Company had total assets of $3.4 billion at September 30, 2021, and for a number of years we have claimed the distinction of being the largest bank headquartered in the South San Joaquin Valley. The Bank’s deposit accounts, which totaled $2.8 billion at September 30, 2021, are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) up to maximum insurable amounts.
Note 2 – Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in a condensed format, and therefore do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for complete financial statements. The information furnished in these interim statements reflects all adjustments that are, in the opinion of Management, necessary for a fair statement of the results for such periods. Such adjustments can generally be considered as normal and recurring unless otherwise disclosed in this Form 10-Q. In preparing the accompanying financial statements, Management has taken subsequent events into consideration and recognized them where appropriate. The results of operations in the interim statements are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any other quarter, or for the full year. Certain amounts reported for 2020 have been reclassified to be consistent with the reporting for 2021. The interim financial information should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).
Note 3 – Current Accounting Developments
In September 2016 the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, which eliminates the probable initial recognition threshold for credit losses in current U.S. GAAP, and instead requires an organization to record a current estimate of all expected credit losses over the contractual term for financial assets carried at amortized cost. This is commonly referred to as the current expected credit losses (“CECL”) methodology. Expected credit losses for financial assets held at the reporting date will be measured based on historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Another change
from existing U.S. GAAP involves the treatment of purchased credit deteriorated assets, which are more broadly defined than purchased credit impaired assets in current accounting standards. When such assets are purchased, institutions will estimate and record an allowance for credit losses that is added to the purchase price rather than being reported as a credit loss expense. Furthermore, ASU 2016-13 updates the measurement of credit losses on available-for-sale debt securities, by mandating that institutions record credit losses on available-for-sale debt securities through an allowance for credit losses rather than the current practice of writing down securities for other-than-temporary impairment. ASU 2016-13 will also require the enhancement of financial statement disclosures regarding estimates used in calculating credit losses. ASU 2016-13 does not change the existing write-off principle in U.S. GAAP or current nonaccrual practices, nor does it change accounting requirements for loans held for sale or certain other financial assets which are measured at the lower of amortized cost or fair value. As a public business entity that is an SEC filer, ASU 2016-13 was originally scheduled to become effective for the Company on January 1, 2020. In March 2020, the Company elected under Section 4014 of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act to defer the implementation of CECL until the earlier of when the national emergency related to the outbreak of COVID-19 ends or December 31, 2020. In December 2020, the Consolidated Appropriations Act 2021, extended the deferral of implementation of CECL from December 31, 2020, to the earlier of the first day of the fiscal year, beginning after the national emergency terminates or January 1, 2022. The Company will now continue to postpone implementation in order to provide additional time to assess better the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the expected lifetime credit losses. On the effective date, institutions will apply the new accounting standard as follows: for financial assets carried at amortized cost, a cumulative-effect adjustment will be recognized on the balance sheet for any change in the related allowance for loan and lease losses generated by the adoption of the new standard; financial assets classified as purchased credit impaired assets prior to the effective date will be reclassified as purchased credit deteriorated assets as of the effective date, and will be grossed up for the related allowance for expected credit losses created as of the effective date; and, debt securities on which other-than-temporary impairment had been recognized prior to the effective date will transition to the new guidance prospectively with no change in their amortized cost basis. The Company plans to implement CECL on January 1, 2022. As of September 30, 2021, we would expect the implementation adjustment to be approximately 50% to 75% of the current balance of the allowance for loan and lease losses. Changes in economic forecasts, or other key assumptions including qualitative factors, and refreshed regression data correlated to loss drivers prior to the implementation of CECL on January 1, 2022, could impact the magnitude of the implementation adjustment.
On March 22, 2020, a statement was issued by our banking regulators and titled the “Interagency Statement on Loan Modifications and Reporting for Financial Institutions Working with Customers Affected by the Coronavirus” (the “Interagency Statement”) that encourages financial institutions to work prudently with borrowers who are or may be unable to meet their contractual payment obligations due to the effects of COVID-19. Additionally, Section 4013 of the CARES Act, that passed on March 27, 2020, further provides that a qualified loan modification is exempt by law from classification as a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”) as defined by GAAP, from the period beginning March 1, 2020 until the earlier of December 31, 2020 or the date that is 60 days after the date on which the national emergency concerning the COVID-19 outbreak declared by the President of the United States under the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.) terminates. The Interagency Statement was subsequently revised in April 2020 to clarify the interaction of the original guidance with Section 4013 of the CARES Act, as well as setting forth the banking regulators’ views on consumer protection considerations. In late December 2020, Section 4013 of the CARES Act was extended through January 1, 2022 by the 2021 Consolidated Appropriations Act. In accordance with such guidance, we offered and continue to offer on a limited-basis, short-term modifications made in response to COVID-19 to borrowers who are current and otherwise not past due. These include short-term, 180 days or less, modifications in the form of payment deferrals, fee waivers, extensions of repayment terms, or other delays in payment that are insignificant. See Note 10 for further information on non-TDR loan modifications. The impact of the Interagency Guidance and Section 4013, as amended, on the Company’s financial statements has not been material through September 30, 2021, but the ultimate impact of the relief provided by these government loan modification provisions cannot be determined at this time.
Note 4 – Share Based Compensation
On March 16, 2017 the Company’s Board of Directors approved and adopted the 2017 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2017 Plan”), which became effective May 24, 2017, the date approved by the Company’s shareholders. The 2017 Plan replaced the Company’s 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2007 Plan”), which expired by its own terms on March 15,
8
2017. Options to purchase 193,609 shares that were granted under the 2007 Plan were still outstanding as of September 30, 2021 and remain unaffected by that plan’s expiration. The 2017 Plan provides for the issuance of both “incentive” and “nonqualified” stock options to officers and employees, and of “nonqualified” stock options to non-employee directors and consultants of the Company. The 2017 Plan also provides for the issuance of restricted stock awards to these same classes of eligible participants. The total number of shares of the Company’s authorized but unissued stock reserved for issuance pursuant to awards under the 2017 Plan was initially 850,000 shares, and the number remaining available for grant as of September 30, 2021 was 452,953. Options to purchase 254,681 shares granted under the 2017 Plan were outstanding as of September 30, 2021. The potential dilutive impact of unexercised stock options is discussed below in Note 5, Earnings per Share.
Pursuant to FASB’s standards on stock compensation, the value of each stock option and restricted stock award is reflected in our income statement as employee compensation or directors’ expense by amortizing its grant date fair value over the vesting period of the option or award. The Company utilizes a Black-Scholes model to determine grant date fair values for options, while the market price of the Company’s common stock at the date of grant is used for restricted stock awards. Forfeitures are reflected in compensation costs as they occur for both types of awards. A pre-tax charge of $0.2 million was reflected in the Company’s income statement during the third quarter of 2021 and $0.2 million was charged during the third quarter of 2020, as expense related to stock options and restricted stock awards. For the first nine months, the charges totaled $0.7 million in 2021 and $0.4 million in 2020.
Restricted Stock Grants
The Company’s Restricted Stock Awards are awards of time-vested, non-transferrable shares of common stock and are available to be granted to the Company’s employees and directors. The vesting period of Restricted Stock Awards is determined at the time the awards are issued, and different awards may have different vesting terms; provided, however, that no installment of any Restricted Stock Award shall become vested less than one year from the grant date. Restricted Stock Awards are valued utilizing the fair value of the Company’s stock at the grant date. During the first nine months of 2021 18,180 shares were granted to employees and directors of the Company. These awards are expensed on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. As of September 30, 2021, there was $2.0 million of unamortized compensation cost related to unvested Restricted Stock Awards granted under the 2017 plan. That cost is expected to be amortized over a weighted average period of 3.6 years.
The Company’s time-vested award activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020 is summarized below (unaudited):
Weighted Average Grant-Date Fair Value
Unvested shares, January 1,
18.00
Granted
18,180
25.30
Vested
(39,449)
Forfeited
(17,777)
Unvested shares September 30,
109,839
19.21
Stock Option Grants
The Company has issued equity instruments in the form of Incentive Stock Options and Nonqualified Stock Options to certain officers and directors and may continue to do so under the 2017 Plan. The exercise price of each stock option is determined at the time of the grant and may be no less than 100% of the fair market value of such stock at the time the option is granted.
9
The Company’s stock option activity during the nine months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020 are summarized below (dollars in thousands, except per share data, unaudited):
Weighted AverageExercise Price
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (in years)
AggregateIntrinsicValue (1)
Outstanding at January 1,
495,489
23.67
1,340
457,959
21.08
3,684
126,000
27.11
Exercised
(7,480)
12.59
91
(19,770)
10.87
267
Canceled
(39,719)
26.93
(16,400)
Outstanding at September 30,
448,290
23.57
5.92
1,302
547,789
22.66
6.47
612
Exercisable at September 30,
384,690
22.97
5.58
373,189
20.68
5.31
Note 5 – Earnings per Share
The computation of earnings per share, as presented in the Consolidated Statements of Income, is based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding during each period, excluding unvested restricted stock awards. There were 15,257,367 weighted average shares outstanding during the third quarter of 2021 and 15,192,838 during the third quarter of 2020, while there were 15,247,477 weighted average shares outstanding during the first nine months of 2021 and 15,215,167 during the first nine months of 2020.
Diluted earnings per share calculations include the effect of the potential issuance of common shares, which for the Company is limited to shares that would be issued on the exercise of “in-the-money” stock options, and unvested restricted stock awards. For the third quarter of 2021, calculations under the treasury stock method resulted in the equivalent of 86,176 shares being added to basic weighted average shares outstanding for purposes of determining diluted earnings per share, while a weighted average of 327,346 stock options were excluded from the calculation because they were underwater and thus anti-dilutive. For the third quarter of 2020 the equivalent of 45,586 shares were added in calculating diluted earnings per share, while 362,407 anti-dilutive stock options were not factored into the computation. Likewise, for the nine months of 2021 the equivalent of 121,772 shares were added to basic weighted average shares outstanding in calculating diluted earnings per share and a weighted average of 339,546 options that were anti-dilutive for the period were not included, compared to the addition of the equivalent of 58,595 shares and non-inclusion of 344,814 anti-dilutive options in calculating diluted earnings per share for first nine months of 2020.
Note 6 – Comprehensive Income
As presented in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, comprehensive income includes net income and other comprehensive income. The Company’s only source of other comprehensive income is unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale investment securities. Investment gains or losses that were realized and reflected in net income of the current period, which had previously been included in other comprehensive income as unrealized holding gains or losses in the period in which they arose, are considered to be reclassification adjustments that are excluded from other comprehensive income in the current period.
Note 7 – Commitments and Contingent Liabilities
The Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business. Those financial instruments currently consist of unused commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. They involve, to varying degrees, elements of risk in excess of the amount recognized in the balance sheet. The Company’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by counterparties for commitments to extend credit and letters of credit is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. The Company uses the same credit policies in
10
making commitments and issuing letters of credit as it does for originating loans included on the balance sheet. The following financial instruments represent off-balance-sheet credit risk (dollars in thousands):
Commitments to extend credit
532,891
441,816
Standby letters of credit
7,151
8,104
Commitments to extend credit consist primarily of the unused or unfunded portions of the following: home equity lines of credit; commercial real estate construction loans, where disbursements are made over the course of construction; commercial revolving lines of credit; mortgage warehouse lines of credit; unsecured personal lines of credit; and formalized (disclosed) deposit account overdraft lines. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the unused portions of committed amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. Standby letters of credit are issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party, and the credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as the risk involved in extending loans to customers.
At September 30, 2021, the Company was also utilizing a letter of credit in the amount of $105 million issued by the Federal Home Loan Bank on the Company’s behalf as security for certain deposits and to facilitate certain credit arrangements with the Company’s customers. That letter of credit is backed by loans which are pledged to the FHLB by the Company.
The Company is subject to loss contingencies, including claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business, which are recorded as liabilities when the likelihood of loss is probable, and an amount or range of loss can be reasonably estimated. Management does not believe there are such matters that will have a material effect on the financial statements.
Note 8 – Fair Value Disclosures and Reporting and Fair Value Measurements
FASB’s standards on financial instruments, and on fair value measurements and disclosures, require public business entities to disclose in their financial statement footnotes the estimated fair values of financial instruments. In addition to disclosure requirements, FASB’s standard on investments requires that our debt securities that are classified as available for sale and any equity securities which have readily determinable fair values be measured and reported at fair value in our statement of financial position. Certain impaired loans are also reported at fair value, as explained in greater detail below, and foreclosed assets are carried at the lower of cost or fair value. FASB’s standard on financial instruments permits companies to report certain other financial assets and liabilities at fair value, but the Company has not elected the fair value option for any of those financial instruments.
Fair value measurement and disclosure standards also establish a framework for measuring fair values. Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability, in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Further, the standards establish a fair value hierarchy that encourages an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and limit the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair values. The standards describe three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair values:
11
Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time based on relevant market data and information about the financial instruments. Fair value disclosures for deposits include demand deposits, which are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. Fair value calculations for loans and leases reflect exit pricing, and incorporate our assumptions with regard to the impact of prepayments on future cash flows and credit quality adjustments based on risk characteristics of various financial instruments, among other things. Since the estimates are subjective and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment they cannot be determined with precision, and changes in assumptions could significantly alter the fair values presented.
Estimated fair values for the Company’s financial instruments are as follows, as of the dates noted:
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Fair Value Measurements
CarryingAmount
Quoted Prices inActive Markets forIdentical Assets(Level 1)
SignificantObservableInputs(Level 2)
SignificantUnobservableInputs(Level 3)
Total
Financial assets:
Investment securities available for sale
Loans and leases, net held for investment
2,121,337
2,103,993
Collateral dependent impaired loans
260
114
374
Financial liabilities:
1,708,701
2,820,112
49,782
33,929
2,441,676
2,450,340
550
1,680,814
2,624,478
Short term borrowings
142,896
24,364
For financial asset categories that were carried on our balance sheet at fair value as of September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, the Company used the following methods and significant assumptions:
12
Assets reported at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below:
Fair Value Measurements – Recurring
Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2021, using
RealizedGain/(Loss)(Level 3)
Securities:
U.S. government agencies
1,693
Mortgage-backed securities
327,645
State and political subdivisions
292,079
Corporate bonds
16,307
Collateralized loan obligations
94,588
Total available-for-sale securities
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2020, using
1,800
314,435
227,739
13
Assets reported at fair value on a nonrecurring basis are summarized below:
Fair Value Measurements – Nonrecurring
SignificantObservable Inputs(Level 2)
SignificantUnobservable Inputs(Level 3)
Impaired loans
Real estate:
1-4 family residential construction
Other construction/land
1-4 family - closed-end
Equity lines
196
Multi-family residential
Commercial real estate - owner occupied
Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied
Farmland
Total real estate
Agricultural
Commercial and industrial
Consumer loans
Total impaired loans
Total assets measured on a nonrecurring basis
353
467
78
373
177
1,521
The table above includes collateral-dependent impaired loan balances for which a specific reserve has been established or on which a write-down has been taken. Information on the Company’s total impaired loan balances and specific loss reserves associated with those balances is included in Note 11 below.
14
The unobservable inputs are based on Management’s best estimates of appropriate discounts in arriving at fair market value. Adjusting any of those inputs could result in a significantly lower or higher fair value measurement. For example, an increase or decrease in actual loss rates would create a directionally opposite change in the fair value of unsecured impaired loans.
Note 9 – Investments
Investment Securities
Although the Company currently has the intent and the ability to hold the securities in its investment portfolio to maturity, the securities are all marketable and are classified as “available for sale” to allow maximum flexibility with regard to interest rate risk and liquidity management. Pursuant to FASB’s guidance on accounting for debt securities, available for sale securities are carried on the Company’s financial statements at their estimated fair market values, with monthly tax-effected “mark-to-market” adjustments made vis-à-vis accumulated other comprehensive income in shareholders’ equity.
The amortized cost and estimated fair value of available-for-sale investment securities are as follows:
Amortized Cost And Estimated Fair Value
AmortizedCost
GrossUnrealizedGains
GrossUnrealizedLosses
Estimated FairValue
1,644
49
320,919
7,236
(510)
277,690
14,597
(208)
16,195
133
(21)
94,591
(3)
Total securities
711,039
22,015
(742)
1,725
75
304,108
10,389
(62)
212,011
15,728
517,844
26,192
15
At September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, the Company had 58 securities and 2 securities, respectively, with gross unrealized losses. Management has evaluated those securities as of the respective dates, and does not believe that any of the unrealized losses are other than temporary. Gross unrealized losses on our investment securities as of the indicated dates are disclosed in the table below, categorized by investment type and by the duration of time that loss positions on individual securities have continuously existed (over or under twelve months).
Investment Portfolio - Unrealized Losses
Less than twelve months
Twelve months or more
Fair Value
(387)
72,050
(123)
2,869
28,844
1,255
8,297
(619)
110,446
4,286
The table below summarizes the Company’s gross realized gains and losses as well as gross proceeds from the sales of securities, for the periods indicated:
Investment Portfolio - Realized Gains/(Losses)
Proceeds from sales, calls and maturities of securities available for sale
1,948
3,390
5,948
29,883
Gross gains on sales, calls and maturities of securities available for sale
433
Gross losses on sales, calls and maturities of securities available for sale
(43)
Net gains on sale of securities available for sale
$11
390
16
The amortized cost and estimated fair value of investment securities available-for-sale at September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020 are shown below, grouped by the remaining time to contractual maturity dates. The expected life of investment securities may not be consistent with contractual maturity dates, since the issuers of the securities might have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without penalties.
Estimated Fair Value of Contractual Maturities
Amortized Cost
Maturing within one year
5,954
6,021
Maturing after one year through five years
21,474
21,786
Maturing after five years through ten years
30,722
32,313
Maturing after ten years
237,380
249,959
Securities not due at a single maturity date:
185,372
189,427
Collateralized mortgage obligations
135,546
138,218
3,812
3,857
9,475
9,732
27,250
28,745
173,199
187,205
157,201
163,029
146,907
151,406
At September 30, 2021, the Company’s investment portfolio included 398 “muni” bonds issued by 330 different government municipalities and agencies located within 32 different states, with an aggregate fair value of $292.1 million. The largest exposure to any single municipality or agency was a combined $4.0 million (fair value) in general obligation bonds issued by the Charter Township of Washington County (MI). In addition, the Company owned 14 subordinated debentures issued by bank holding companies totaling $16.3 million (fair value).
The Company’s investments in bonds issued by corporations, states, municipalities and political subdivisions are evaluated in accordance with Financial Institution Letter 48-2012, issued by the FDIC, “Revised Standards of Creditworthiness for Investment Securities,” and other regulatory guidance. Credit ratings are considered in our analysis only as a guide to the historical default rate associated with similarly-rated bonds. There have been no significant differences in our internal analyses compared with the ratings assigned by the third party credit rating agencies.
17
The following table summarizes the amortized cost and fair values of general obligation and revenue bonds in the Company’s investment securities portfolio at the indicated dates, identifying the state in which the issuing municipality or agency operates for our largest geographic concentrations:
Revenue and General Obligation Bonds by Location
Amortized
Fair Market
General obligation bonds
Cost
Value
State of issuance
Texas
101,560
106,865
76,794
82,888
47,884
49,793
31,122
33,100
Washington
24,029
26,011
22,896
25,072
Other (29 & 29 states, respectively)
66,515
69,853
51,827
55,352
Total general obligation bonds
239,988
252,522
182,639
196,412
Revenue bonds
6,970
7,441
7,023
7,516
3,353
3,491
2,249
2,406
1,335
1,358
363
379
Other (32 & 32 states, respectively)
26,044
27,267
19,737
21,026
Total revenue bonds
37,702
39,557
29,372
31,327
Total obligations of states and political subdivisions
The revenue bonds in the Company’s investment securities portfolios were issued by government municipalities and agencies to fund public services such as utilities (water, sewer, and power), educational facilities, and general public and economic improvements. The primary sources of revenue for these bonds are delineated in the table below, which shows the amortized cost and fair market values for the largest revenue concentrations as of the indicated dates.
Revenue Bonds by Type
Revenue source:
Water
13,551
14,109
12,609
Sewer
5,390
5,667
4,584
4,891
Lease
4,613
4,871
2,707
2,773
Sales tax
4,100
4,203
3,083
3,308
Other (10 and 8 sources, respectively)
10,047
10,707
6,389
6,829
Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (“LIHTC”) Fund Investments
The Company has the ability to invest in limited partnerships which own housing projects that qualify for federal and/or California state tax credits, by mandating a specified percentage of low-income tenants for each project. The primary investment return comes from tax credits that flow through to investors. Because rent levels are lower than standard market rents and the projects are generally highly leveraged, each project also typically generates tax-deductible operating losses that are allocated to the limited partners for tax purposes.
18
The Company made investment commitments to nine different LIHTC fund limited partnerships from 2001 through 2017, all of which were California-focused funds that help the Company meet its obligations under the Community Reinvestment Act. We utilize the cost method of accounting for our LIHTC fund investments, under which we initially record on our balance sheet an asset that represents the total cash expected to be invested over the life of the partnership. Any commitments or contingent commitments for future investment are reflected as a liability. The income statement reflects tax credits and any other tax benefits from these investments “below the line” within our income tax provision, while the initial book value of the investment is amortized on a straight-line basis as an offset to noninterest income, over the time period in which the tax credits and tax benefits are expected to be received.
As of September 30, 2021, our total LIHTC investment book balance was $3.1 million, which includes $0.1 million in remaining commitments for additional capital contributions. There were $0.4 million in tax credits derived from our LIHTC investments that were recognized during the nine months ended September 30, 2021, and amortization expense of $0.4 million associated with those investments was netted against pre-tax noninterest income for the same time period. Our LIHTC investments are evaluated annually for potential impairment, and we have concluded that the carrying value of the investments is stated fairly and is not impaired.
Note 10 – Credit Quality and Nonperforming Assets
Credit Quality Classifications
The Company monitors the credit quality of loans on a continuous basis using the regulatory and accounting classifications of pass, special mention, substandard and impaired to characterize the associated credit risk. Balances classified as “loss” are immediately charged off. The Company conforms to the following definitions for its risk classifications:
19
Credit quality classifications for the Company’s loan balances were as follows, as of the dates indicated:
Pass
SpecialMention
Substandard
Impaired
33,204
1,516
34,720
25,139
25,512
1-4 family - closed end
213,453
3,348
840
2,599
220,240
25,183
2,242
56
3,860
31,341
52,123
3,505
55,628
329,776
8,913
3,908
2,519
345,116
949,741
26,681
19,119
380
995,921
111,929
7,853
4,245
419
124,446
1,740,548
54,058
28,168
10,150
1,832,924
41,377
1,448
471
43,296
120,857
9,697
226
1,512
132,292
Mortgage warehouse
126,486
4,561
69
163
4,828
Total gross loans and leases
2,033,829
63,790
29,911
12,296
40,044
8,521
48,565
61,809
7,478
2,148
545
71,980
130,559
4,922
1,356
2,999
139,836
30,479
2,581
4,957
38,075
57,934
3,597
334
61,865
308,819
21,148
5,652
7,580
343,199
1,026,041
10,827
25,048
582
1,062,498
104,826
21,468
3,169
442
129,905
1,760,511
80,542
37,431
17,439
1,895,923
39,391
3,617
1,614
44,872
194,876
11,819
1,259
1,094
209,048
307,679
5,323
197
5,589
2,307,780
96,036
40,315
18,980
Past Due and Nonperforming Assets
Nonperforming assets are comprised of loans for which the Company is no longer accruing interest, and foreclosed assets. The Company’s foreclosed assets include OREO, which consists of commercial and/or residential real estate properties acquired by foreclosure or similar means that the Company is offering or will offer for sale. Foreclosed assets totaled $0.1 million at September 30, 2021, and $1.0 million at December 31, 2020. Gross nonperforming loans totaled $6.8 million at September 30, 2021 and $7.6 million at December 31, 2020. Loans and leases are classified as nonperforming when reasonable doubt surfaces with regard to the ability of the Company to collect all principal and interest. At that point, we stop accruing interest on the loan or lease in question and reverse any previously recognized
20
interest to the extent that it is uncollected or associated with interest-reserve loans. Any asset for which principal or interest has been in default for 90 days or more is also placed on non-accrual status even if interest is still being received, unless the asset is both well secured and in the process of collection. As of September 30, 2021, the Company had $10.4 million in loans with payment deferrals either under section 4013 of the CARES Act or the April 7, 2020 Interagency Statement.
An aging of the Company’s loan balances is presented in the following tables, by number of days past due as of the indicated dates:
Loan Portfolio Aging
30-59 DaysPast Due
60-89 DaysPast Due
90 Days OrMore Past Due(1)
TotalPast Due
Current
Total FinancingReceivables
Non-AccrualLoans(2)
219,861
1,418
1,962
698
99
797
344,319
1,251
1,077
1,176
1,831,748
5,050
305
42,991
206
488
695
131,597
1,245
Mortgage warehouse lines
Consumer
4,750
22
1,293
165
796
2,254
2,137,572
6,788
21
210
37
150
397
139,439
1,193
1,409
551
1,960
36,115
2,403
101
1,187
1,366
341,833
1,678
152
1,062,346
211
653
129,252
1,720
1,435
1,373
4,528
1,891,395
6,298
44,622
325
237
562
208,486
1,026
38
5,551
24
2,083
1,860
5,378
2,457,733
7,598
Troubled Debt Restructurings
A loan that is modified for a borrower who is experiencing financial difficulty is classified as a troubled debt restructuring (TDR) if the modification constitutes a concession, excluding loan modifications that are COVID-19 related and made in accordance with the interagency guidance and the CARES Act as described in Note 3, above. At September 30, 2021, the Company had a total of $7.8 million in TDRs, including $2.3 million in TDRs that were on non-accrual status. Generally, a non-accrual loan that has been modified as a TDR remains on non-accrual status for a period of at least six months to demonstrate the borrower’s ability to comply with the modified terms. However, performance prior to the modification, or significant events that coincide with the modification, could result in a loan’s return to accrual status after a shorter performance period or even at the time of loan modification. Regardless of the period of time that has elapsed, if the borrower’s ability to meet the revised payment schedule is uncertain, then the loan will be kept on non-accrual status.
The Company may agree to different types of concessions when modifying a loan or lease. The tables below summarize TDRs which were modified during the noted periods, by type of concession:
Troubled Debt Restructurings, by Type of Loan Modification
Three months ended September 30, 2021
Rate Modification
Term Modification
Interest Only Modification
Rate & Term Modification
Term & Interest Modification
1,000
Total real estate loans
Three months ended September 30, 2020
Interest OnlyModification
569
586
23
Nine months ended September 30, 2021
83
1,083
136
1,136
1,219
118
185
1,480
1,563
Nine months ended September 30, 2020
85
1,325
747
338
1,085
2,157
2,495
45
2,202
2,540
Pre-Modification
Post-Modification
Number ofLoans
OutstandingRecordedInvestment
ReserveDifference⁽¹⁾
Reserve
0
Outstanding RecordedInvestment
Outstanding Recorded Investment
Reserve Difference⁽¹⁾
25
137
(1)
1,220
116
47
1,564
86
2,496
2,541
60
The Company had no finance receivables modified as TDRs within the previous twelve months that defaulted or were charged off during the three- or nine-month periods ended September 30, 2021 and 2020.
26
Purchased Credit Impaired Loans
The Company may acquire loans which show evidence of credit deterioration since origination. These purchased credit impaired (“PCI”) loans are recorded at the amount paid, since there is no carryover of the seller’s allowance for loan losses. Potential losses on PCI loans subsequent to acquisition are recognized by an increase in the allowance for loan losses. PCI loans are accounted for individually or are aggregated into pools of loans based on common risk characteristics. The Company projects the amount and timing of expected cash flows, and expected cash receipts in excess of the amount paid for any such loans are recorded as interest income over the remaining life of the loan or pool of loans (accretable yield). The excess of contractual principal and interest over expected cash flows is not recorded (nonaccretable difference). Expected cash flows are periodically re-evaluated throughout the life of the loan or pool of loans. If the present value of the expected cash flows is determined at any time to be less than the carrying amount, a reserve is recorded. If the present value of the expected cash flows is greater than the carrying amount, it is recognized as part of future interest income.
Our acquisition of Santa Clara Valley Bank in 2014 included certain loans which have shown evidence of credit deterioration since origination, and for which it was probable at acquisition that all contractually required payments would not be collected. The carrying amount and unpaid principal balance of those PCI loans was as follows, as of the dates indicated:
Purchased Credit Impaired Loans:
Unpaid Principal Balance
Carrying Value
Real estate secured
Total purchased credit impaired loans
$78
There was no allowance for loan losses allocated for PCI loans as of September 30, 2021 or December 31, 2020. There was no discount accretion recorded on PCI loans during the nine months ended September 30, 2021.
Note 11 – Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses
The Company’s allowance for loan and lease losses, a contra-asset, is established through a provision for loan and lease losses. The allowance is maintained at a level that is considered adequate to absorb probable losses on certain specifically identified impaired loans, as well as probable incurred losses inherent in the remaining loan portfolio. Specifically identifiable and quantifiable losses are immediately charged off against the allowance; recoveries are generally recorded only when cash payments are received subsequent to the charge off. We employ a systematic methodology, consistent with FASB guidelines on loss contingencies and impaired loans, for determining the appropriate level of the allowance for loan and lease losses and adjusting it to that level at least quarterly. Pursuant to our methodology, impaired loans and leases are individually analyzed and a criticized asset action plan is completed specifying the financial status of the borrower and, if applicable, the characteristics and condition of collateral and any associated liquidation plan. A specific loss allowance is created for each impaired loan, if necessary.
The following tables disclose the unpaid principal balance, recorded investment, average recorded investment, and interest income recognized for impaired loans on our books as of the dates indicated. Balances are shown by loan type, and are further broken out by those that required an allowance and those that did not, with the associated allowance disclosed for those that required such. Included in the valuation allowance for impaired loans shown in the tables below are specific reserves allocated to TDRs, totaling $0.5 million at September 30, 2021 and $0.6 million at December 31, 2020.
27
Impaired Loans
Unpaid PrincipalBalance(1)
RecordedInvestment(2)
Related Allowance
AverageRecordedInvestment
Interest IncomeRecognized(3)
With an allowance recorded
90
382
1,422
39
1,459
125
1,991
156
2,058
130
Commercial real estate- owner occupied
1,268
1,286
120
Commercial real estate- non-owner occupied
126
400
5,434
5,585
452
244
247
995
1,072
36
28
Subtotal
6,836
1,061
7,081
516
With no related allowance recorded
1,190
1,177
1,244
1,881
1,869
1,945
1,371
1,297
429
4,861
4,716
4,915
227
275
517
619
30
5,635
5,460
5,809
12,471
12,890
526
RelatedAllowance
Average Recorded Investment
171
565
2,078
2,077
51
2,141
104
2,875
233
2,989
98
343
6,076
54
6,135
11,908
11,907
525
12,173
491
945
935
202
1,152
235
221
13,338
13,289
996
13,796
513
942
922
960
2,160
2,082
2,127
1,624
1,504
1,590
617
446
5,864
5,532
5,745
189
159
6,058
5,691
5,915
19,396
19,711
518
The specific loss allowance for an impaired loan generally represents the difference between the book value of the loan and either the fair value of underlying collateral less estimated disposition costs, or the loan’s net present value as determined by a discounted cash flow analysis. The discounted cash flow approach is typically used to measure impairment on loans for which it is anticipated that repayment will be provided from cash flows other than those generated solely by the disposition or operation of underlying collateral. However, historical loss rates may be used by the Company to determine a specific loss allowance if those rates indicate a higher potential reserve need than the discounted cash flow analysis. Any change in impairment attributable to the passage of time is accommodated by adjusting the loss allowance accordingly.
For loans where repayment is expected to be provided by the disposition or operation of the underlying collateral, impairment is measured using the fair value of the collateral. If the collateral value, net of the expected costs of disposition, is less than the loan balance, then a specific loss reserve is established for the shortfall in collateral coverage. If the discounted collateral value is greater than or equal to the loan balance, no specific loss reserve is required. At the time a collateral-dependent loan is designated as nonperforming, a new appraisal is ordered and typically received within 30 to 60 days if a recent appraisal is not already available. We use external appraisals to determine the fair value of the underlying collateral for nonperforming real estate loans. Until an updated appraisal is received, the Company uses the existing appraisal to determine the amount of the specific loss allowance that may be required. The specific loss
29
allowance is adjusted, as necessary, once a new appraisal is received. Updated appraisals are generally ordered at least annually for collateral-dependent loans that remain impaired, and current appraisals were available or in process for 71% of the Company’s impaired real estate loan balances at September 30, 2021. Furthermore, the Company analyzes collateral-dependent loans on at least a quarterly basis, to determine if any portion of the recorded investment in such loans can be identified as uncollectible and would therefore constitute a confirmed loss. All amounts deemed to be uncollectible are promptly charged off against the Company’s allowance for loan and lease losses, with the loan then carried at the fair value of the collateral, as appraised, less estimated costs of disposition if applicable. Once a charge-off or write-down is recorded, it will not be restored to the loan balance on the Company’s accounting books.
Our methodology also provides for the establishment of a “general” allowance for probable incurred losses inherent in loans and leases that are not impaired. Unimpaired loan balances are segregated by credit quality, and are then evaluated in pools with common characteristics. At the present time, pools are based on the same segmentation of loan types presented in our regulatory filings. While this methodology utilizes historical loss data and other measurable information, the credit classification of loans and the establishment of the allowance for loan and lease losses are both to some extent based on Management’s judgment and experience. Our methodology incorporates a variety of risk considerations, both quantitative and qualitative, in establishing an allowance for loan and lease losses that Management believes is appropriate at each reporting date. Quantitative information includes our historical loss experience, delinquency and charge-off trends, and current collateral values. Qualitative factors include the general economic environment in our markets and, in particular, the condition of the agricultural industry and other key industries. Lending policies and procedures (including underwriting standards), the experience and abilities of lending staff, the quality of loan review, credit concentrations (by geography, loan type, industry and collateral type), the rate of loan portfolio growth, and changes in legal or regulatory requirements are additional factors that are considered. The total general reserve established for probable incurred losses on unimpaired loans was $14.6 million at September 30, 2021.
There were no material changes to the methodology used to determine our allowance for loan and lease losses during the three months ended September 30, 2021, although as outlined in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements we will substantially update our methodology upon the implementation of the CECL accounting method under Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Update ASU 2016-13 and related amendments, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326) to the earlier of the first day of the fiscal year, beginning after the national emergency related to the outbreak of COVID-19 terminates or January 1, 2022. Moreover, we will continue to enhance our methodology as needed in order to comply with regulatory and accounting requirements, keep pace with the size and complexity of our loan and lease portfolio, and respond to pressures created by external forces. We engage outside firms on a regular basis to assess our methodology and perform independent credit reviews of our loan and lease portfolio.
The tables that follow detail the activity in the allowance for loan and lease losses for the periods noted:
Allowance for Credit Losses and Recorded Investment in Financing Receivables
Real Estate
Agricultural Products
Commercial and Industrial (1)
Unallocated
Allowance for credit losses:
Beginning balance
12,075
524
3,072
690
16,421
Charge-offs
(52)
(274)
(326)
Recoveries
(59)
170
122
(Benefit) provision
261
(930)
Ending balance
12,277
2,101
585
129
15,617
11,766
482
4,721
720
17,738
(245)
(50)
(129)
(606)
(1,030)
590
203
566
1,359
166
(2,694)
(95)
80
Reserves:
Specific
General
11,858
1,719
14,556
Loans evaluated for impairment:
Individually
Collectively
1,822,774
42,825
257,266
4,665
2,127,530
258,778
Year ended December 31, 2020
193
2,685
1,278
132
9,923
(436)
(1,397)
(1,833)
87
882
1,098
Provision (benefit)
6,044
289
2,343
(83)
8,550
11,241
232
4,519
701
16,742
1,878,484
515,633
5,392
2,444,131
516,727
31
(419)
(1,137)
(1,556)
708
869
5,047
283
1,133
(2)
(111)
10,760
476
3,482
847
15,586
552
344
88
1,234
10,208
3,138
759
14,352
13,150
1,239
255
14,894
1,810,731
45,532
503,501
5,642
2,365,406
1,823,881
45,782
504,740
5,897
2,380,300
Note 12 – Long-Term Debt
Long-Term Debt
Unamortized
Debt Issuance
Principal
Costs
Fixed - floating rate subordinated debentures, due 2031 (1)
50,000
(779)
Total long-term debt
Note 13 – Revenue Recognition
The Company utilizes the guidance found in ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASC 606), when accounting for certain noninterest income. The core principle of this guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Sufficient information should be provided to enable users of financial statements to understand the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. The Company’s revenue streams that are within the scope of and accounted for under Topic 606 include service charges on deposit accounts, debit card interchange fees, and fees levied for other services the Company provides its customers. The guidance does not apply to revenue associated with financial instruments such as loans and investments, and other noninterest income such as loan servicing fees and earnings on bank-owned life insurance, which are accounted for on an accrual basis under other provisions of GAAP.
32
All of the Company’s revenue from contracts within the scope of ASC 606 is recognized as noninterest income, except for gains on the sale of OREO which is classified as noninterest expense. The following table presents the Company’s sources of noninterest income for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2021 and 2020. Items outside the scope of ASC 606 are noted as such (dollars in thousands, unaudited).
For the three months ended September 30,
For the nine months ended September 30,
Returned item and overdraft fees
1,307
1,160
3,561
3,785
Other service charges on deposits
1,879
1,790
5,116
4,967
Debit card interchange income
2,192
1,828
6,321
5,183
Loss on limited partnerships(1)
(144)
(716)
(391)
(1,031)
Dividends on equity investments(1)
187
190
543
Unrealized gains recognized on equity investments(1)
857
447
Net gains on sale of securities(1)
Other(1)
2,103
2,853
4,959
5,847
Salaries and employee benefits (1)
Occupancy expense (1)
(Gain) loss on sale of OREO
(26)
(12)
Other (1)
7,924
7,058
21,856
18,640
Percentage of noninterest revenue not within scope of ASC 606.
28.63%
32.75%
28.50%
30.71%
With regard to noninterest income associated with customer contracts, the Company has determined that transaction prices are fixed, and performance obligations are satisfied as services are rendered, thus there is little or no judgment involved in the timing of revenue recognition under contracts that are within the scope of ASC 606.
Note 14 – Subsequent Events
On October 21, 2021 the Board approved the 2021 Share Repurchase Plan which authorizes 1,000,000 shares of common stock for repurchase. In conjunction with this action, the Board terminated the current Share Repurchase Plan which authorized 500,000 shares of common stock for repurchase. There were 268,301 shares remaining for repurchase under the current Share Repurchase Plan. Those remaining shares were rolled into the 2021 Share Repurchase Plan, which are included in the 1,000,000 shares authorized for repurchase. The Company plans to commence repurchases of shares in the fourth quarter of 2021.
33
ITEM 2
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Form 10-Q includes forward-looking statements that involve inherent risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements are within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 (“1933 Act”), as amended and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“1934 Act”), as amended. Those sections of the 1933 Act and 1934 Act provide a “safe harbor” for forward-looking statements in order to encourage companies to provide prospective information about their financial performance as long as important factors that could cause actual results to differ significantly from projected results are identified with meaningful cautionary statements. Words such as “expects”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “projects”, “intends”, and “estimates” or variations of such words and similar expressions, as well as future or conditional verbs preceded by “will”, “would”, “should”, “could” or “may” are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on certain underlying assumptions and are not guarantees of future performance, as they could be impacted by several potential risks and developments that cannot be predicted with any degree of certainty.
These statements are based on management’s current expectations regarding economic, legislative, regulatory and other environmental issues that may affect our earnings in future periods. Therefore, actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed, forecast in, or implied by such forward-looking statements.
A variety of factors could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations, and should be considered when evaluating the Company’s potential future financial performance. They include, but are not limited to:
Risk factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from results that might be implied by forward-looking statements include the risk factors detailed in the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 and in Item 1A, herein. We do not update forward-looking statements to reflect circumstances or events that occur after the date the forward-looking statements are made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The Company’s financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The financial information and disclosures contained within those statements are significantly impacted by Management’s estimates and judgments, which are based on historical experience and incorporate various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under current circumstances. Actual results may differ from those estimates under divergent conditions.
Critical accounting policies are those that involve the most complex and subjective decisions and assessments, and have the greatest potential impact on the Company’s stated results of operations. In Management’s opinion, the Company’s critical accounting policies deal with the following areas:
Critical accounting areas are evaluated on an ongoing basis to ensure that the Company’s financial statements incorporate our most recent expectations regarding those areas.
OVERVIEW OF THE RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
AND FINANCIAL CONDITION
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS SUMMARY
Third Quarter 2021 compared to Third Quarter 2020
Third quarter 2021 net income was $10.6 million, or $0.69 per diluted share, compared to $10.4 million, or $0.68 per diluted share in the third quarter of 2020. The Company’s annualized return on average equity was 11.62% and annualized return on average assets was 1.26% for the quarter ended September 30, 2021, compared to 12.34% and 1.34%, respectively, for the same quarter in 2020. The primary drivers behind the variance in third quarter net income are as follows:
Year-to-Date Changes 2021 compared to First Nine-Months of 2020
Net income for the first nine months of 2021 was $33.4 million, or $2.17 per diluted share, compared to $26.5 million, or $1.73 per diluted share for the same period in 2020. The Company’s annualized return on average equity was 12.60% and annualized return on average assets was 1.36% for the nine months ended September 30, 2021, compared to a return on equity of 10.90% and return on assets of 1.26% for the nine months ended September 30, 2020. The primary drivers behind the variance in year-to-date net income are as follows:
FINANCIAL CONDITION SUMMARY
September 30, 2021 relative to December 31, 2020
The Company’s assets totaled $3.4 billion at September 30, 2021 relative to $3.2 billion at December 31, 2020. The following provides a summary of key balance sheet changes during the first nine months of 2021:
IMPACT OF CORONAVIRUS DISEASE 2019 (COVID-19) PANDEMIC ON THE COMPANY’S OPERATIONS
Overview
On January 31, 2020, the United States Department of Health and Human Services declared a public health emergency with respect to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Subsequent to this date, federal, state, and local governmental agencies, regulatory agencies, and the Federal Reserve Board took actions impacting the Company including these more significant items:
Impact of COVID-19 on the Company’s Operations
EARNINGS PERFORMANCE
The Company earns income from two primary sources. The first is net interest income, which is interest income generated by earning assets less interest expense on deposits and other borrowed money. The second is noninterest income, which primarily consists of customer service charges and fees but also comes from non-customer sources such as bank-owned life insurance and certain non-debt investments. The majority of the Company’s noninterest expense is comprised of operating costs that facilitate offering a broad range of banking services to our customers.
NET INTEREST INCOME AND NET INTEREST MARGIN
Net interest income decreased $1.4 million to $26.7 million, for the third quarter of 2021 over the third quarter of 2020 and increased $6.5 million, or 8% to $82.5 million for the first nine months of 2021 in comparison to the first nine months of 2020.
For the third quarter of 2021 as compared to the same quarter in 2020, average loan balances decreased $161.9 million, or 7%, primarily due to $144.6 million, or a 55% decrease in the utilization of mortgage warehouse lines, and a $86.4 million, or 38% decrease in commercial loans, from the forgiveness of SBA PPP loans. These decreases were partially offset by a $75.4 million increase in real estate loan balances, primarily from the purchase of $121.6 million in mortgage loan pools, later in the third quarter of 2021. The average yield on the overall loan portfolio increased 5 basis points, while there was a 2 bps favorable decrease in the cost of interest-bearing liabilities for the third quarter of 2021 as compared to the same quarter in 2020.
For the first nine months of 2021 as compared to the same period in 2020, average loan balances increased $254.3 million or 13%, primarily due to increases in real estate loans of $301.7 million or 20%. The increase in the aforementioned average loan balances were the major driver in the increase in net interest income with a 18 bps decrease in loan yield partially offsetting the increase in volume. There was a 17 bps favorable decrease in the yield on interest bearing liabilities driven by an increase in lower or no cost core deposits and a decrease in higher cost time deposits for the first nine months of 2021 as compared to the same period in 2020.
The level of net interest income we recognize in any given period depends on a combination of factors including the average volume and yield for interest earning assets, the average volume and cost of interest-bearing liabilities, and the mix of products which comprise the Company’s earning assets, deposits, and other interest-bearing liabilities.
The following tables show average balances for significant balance sheet categories and the amount of interest income or interest expense associated with each category for the noted periods. The tables also display calculated yields on each major component of the Company’s investment and loan portfolios, average rates paid on each key segment of the Company’s interest-bearing liabilities, and our net interest margin for the noted periods.
Average Balances and Rates
For the three months ended
September 30, 2020
Assets
Average Balance (1)
Income/Expense
AverageRate/Yield (2)
AverageBalance (1)
Investments:
Interest-earning due from banks
379,597
0.15%
6,942
0.11%
Taxable
389,524
1.71%
366,046
1.99%
Non-taxable
259,996
3.05%
227,283
3.25%
Total investments
1,029,117
3,403
1.47%
600,271
3,301
2.45%
Loans and leases:(3)
Real estate
1,775,611
20,805
4.65%
1,700,241
20,467
4.79%
43,243
410
3.76%
47,733
435
3.63%
Commercial
140,105
1,796
5.09%
226,511
2,485
4.36%
4,862
205
16.73%
6,226
236
15.08%
118,036
982
3.30%
262,593
2,087
3.16%
1,463
7.59%
1,868
6.82%
Total loans and leases
2,083,320
4.61%
2,245,172
4.56%
Total interest earning assets (4)
3,112,437
3.58%
2,845,443
4.12%
Other earning assets
15,713
13,190
Non-earning assets
212,116
215,819
3,340,266
3,074,452
Liabilities and shareholders' equity
Interest bearing deposits:
Demand deposits
148,175
0.23%
140,634
0.21%
NOW
605,620
115
0.08%
516,915
89
0.07%
Savings accounts
443,406
0.06%
354,331
Money market
139,433
126,567
0.09%
Certificates of deposit, under $100,000
70,260
0.27%
76,000
0.34%
Certificates of deposit, $100,000 or more
223,119
201
0.36%
352,171
318
Brokered deposits
72,283
0.29%
29,696
0.20%
Total interest bearing deposits
1,702,296
0.14%
1,596,314
0.16%
Borrowed funds:
Federal funds purchased
0.00%
0.26%
78,965
39,268
0.41%
66,812
0.17%
3.95%
35,229
243
2.74%
35,052
2.93%
Total borrowed funds
118,173
322
1.08%
142,648
328
0.91%
Total interest bearing liabilities
1,785,240
1,738,962
0.22%
Demand deposits - noninterest bearing
1,104,506
958,233
53,134
43,521
362,157
333,736
Interest income/interest earning assets
Interest expense/interest earning assets
0.12%
Net interest income and margin(5)
3.46%
3.98%
42
(Dollars in Thousands, Unaudited)
For the nine months ended
255,962
0.13%
32,332
0.64%
351,109
1.84%
392,617
2.23%
241,866
3.18%
213,294
3.36%
848,937
9,624
638,243
10,943
2.53%
1,826,476
63,211
4.63%
1,524,821
57,544
5.04%
44,441
1,237
3.72%
48,022
1,470
4.09%
165,916
6,371
5.13%
168,574
4,661
3.69%
5,085
594
15.62%
6,822
831
16.27%
167,293
4,061
204,839
4,884
1,503
81
7.21%
3,302
5.99%
2,210,714
4.57%
1,956,380
4.75%
3,059,651
3.77%
2,594,623
4.20%
14,817
13,074
207,523
206,816
3,281,991
2,814,513
147,000
251
121,246
209
592,177
485,176
419,861
175
326,730
138,408
123,149
70,992
78,239
270
0.46%
276,261
0.32%
365,532
2,104
0.77%
88,132
176
30,135
219
0.97%
1,732,831
1,530,207
2,032
511
61,103
124
33,676
0.40%
4,846
28,299
43
1,285
35,186
736
2.80%
35,008
3.68%
104,452
901
1.15%
97,494
1,110
1.52%
1,802,097
1,627,701
0.37%
1,045,179
822,882
45,191
39,646
354,338
324,284
3.66%
3.97%
The Volume and Rate Variances table below sets forth the dollar difference for the comparative periods in interest earned or paid for each major category of interest earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, and the amount of such change attributable to fluctuations in average balances (volume) or differences in average interest rates. Volume variances are equal to the increase or decrease in average balances multiplied by prior period rates, and rate variances are equal to the change in rates multiplied by prior period average balances. Variances attributable to both rate and volume changes, calculated by multiplying the change in rates by the change in average balances, have been allocated to the rate variance.
Volume & Rate Variances
2021 over 2020
Increase (decrease) due to
Assets:
Volume
Rate
Net
Federal funds sold/due from time
107
144
(977)
95
(271)
(153)
(1,015)
(1,707)
(100)
111
(276)
293
Total investments (1)
436
(334)
102
949
(2,268)
(1,319)
907
(569)
11,384
(5,717)
(41)
(25)
(110)
(233)
(948)
259
(689)
(73)
1,783
1,710
(31)
(212)
(237)
(1,149)
44
(1,105)
(895)
72
(823)
(7)
(4)
(81)
(67)
Total loans and leases (1)
(1,290)
(226)
(1,516)
10,013
(3,996)
6,017
Total interest earning assets (1)
(854)
(560)
(1,414)
10,962
(6,264)
4,698
Liabilities
(28)
(5)
(15)
(13)
(18)
(125)
(117)
(514)
(937)
(1,451)
421
(464)
Total interest bearing deposits (1)
(65)
(1,602)
(1,550)
82
(29)
(36)
Subordinated debt
(16)
(234)
(229)
Total borrowed funds (1)
(17)
(6)
(263)
(209)
Total interest bearing liabilities (1)
(54)
(56)
106
(1,865)
(1,759)
Net interest income (1)
(800)
(558)
(1,358)
10,856
(4,399)
6,457
The volume variance calculated for the third quarter of 2021 relative to the third quarter of 2020 was an unfavorable $0.8 million due to lower average balances of interest earning assets, resulting from a decrease in mortgage warehouse line utilization coupled with a decrease in commercial loans, mostly from the forgiveness of SBA PPP loans, partially offset by an increase in real estate loans. There was an unfavorable rate variance of $0.6 million for the comparative quarters
since the weighted average yield on interest earning assets fell by 54 basis points and the weighted average cost of interest-bearing liabilities decreased by 2 basis points. The rate variance was negatively impacted by the following factors: high average balances of cash and due from banks earning on average 15 bps, new loans and investments having lower yields overall, including low-yielding 1-4 SFD mortgage loans and SBA PPP loans. These negative factors were slightly offset by an increase in lower costs of time-deposits and other interest-bearing liabilities. The average fees on the SBA PPP loans was approximately 5.5%. These fees, net of loan costs, are being accreted over the stated life of the loan (generally two years for PPP loans generated in 2020 and 5 years for PPP loans generated in 2021), net of loan costs. Our customers with an SBA PPP loan are generally eligible to apply for loan forgiveness after 24 weeks. After the 24-week covered period, PPP borrowers have ten months to apply for forgiveness. During this period, payments are not due on the loan. If a loan is forgiven, upon repayment of principal and interest by the SBA, any unaccreted fee income, net of unamortized costs, would be recognized as interest income at such time. The decrease in rate on interest earning assets was more than the net volume/rate decrease in interest bearing liabilities and resulted in an unfavorable $1.4 million net volume/rate difference. The Company’s net interest margin for the third quarter of 2021 was 3.46%, as compared to 3.98% for the third quarter of 2020.
The volume variance calculated for the first nine months of 2021 relative to the first nine months of 2020 reflects a favorable volume variance of $10.9 million and an unfavorable rate variance of $4.4 million, resulting from organic growth in commercial real estate loans. The growth in interest earning assets was partially offset by the 43 basis point decrease in yield while interest bearing liabilities increased $174.4 million with a 17 basis point drop in cost. Since the volume variances outweighed the declines in yield there was a favorable $6.5 million net volume/rate difference. The Company’s net interest margin for the first nine months of 2021 was 3.66%, as compared to 3.97% in the first nine months of 2020.
As described above, a lower rate environment precipitated by two interest rate cuts by the Federal Open Market Committee totaling 150 bps in March 2020 and other economic uncertainty negatively impacted our yield on existing adjustable and variable rate portfolio loans and created a lower initial interest rate for new loan volumes. At September 30, 2021, approximately 9% of our total portfolio, or $192.7 million, consists of variable rate loans. Of these variable rate loans, approximately $69.9 million have floors that limited the overall reduction in rates. At September 30, 2021, our outstanding fixed rate loans represented 22% of our loan portfolio. The remaining 69% of our loan portfolio at September 30, 2021 consists of adjustable-rate loans; 60% of these loans (approximately $883 million) will not begin adjusting for at least another 3 years, but up to 10 years. These loans are typically adjustable every five years after the initial adjustment. Approximately $54.3 million of these adjustable-rate loans have the ability to reprice next quarter.
Cash balances for the quarter and year to date comparisons continue to increase and have a negative impact on our net interest margin since cash balances earn considerably lower yields than other earning assets. Average cash and due from banks was $379.6 million, an increase of $372.7 million for the third quarter of 2021 as compared to the third quarter of 2020 and was $256.0 million, an increase of $223.6 million for the first nine months of 2021 as compared to the same period in 2020.
Overall average investment securities increased by $56.2 million for the third quarter of September 30, 2021 as compared to September 30, 2020 and decreased by $12.9 million for the first nine months of 2021 as compared to the same period in 2020. For the quarter ending September 30, 2021 over the same period for 2020, average non-taxable securities increased $32.7 million and taxable securities increased $23.5 million. For the first nine months of 2021 over the same period for 2020, average non-taxable securities increased $28.6 million and taxable securities decreased $41.5 million due mostly to prepayments on mortgage-backed securities. Partially offsetting the decrease to taxable securities were purchases of subordinated debentures of bank holding companies and collateralized loan obligations. The overall investment portfolio had a tax-equivalent yield of 2.44% at September 30, 2021, with an average life of 4.9 years.
Interest expense was $0.9 million in the third quarter of 2021, a decline of $0.1 million, or 6%, compared to the third quarter of 2020 and was $2.7 million in the first nine-months of 2021, a decline of $1.8 million or 39%. The decline in interest expense for both the quarter and the nine months is attributable to a favorable shift in deposit mix as average total time deposits declined by $134.8 million, or 31%, in the third quarter of 2021 as compared to the same quarter in 2020 and by $96.5 million, or 22% for the first nine months of 2021 as compared to the same period in 2020. The average cost of interest-bearing deposits declined by 2 basis points to 14 basis points for the third quarter of 2021
compared to the third quarter of 2020, and by 15 basis points to 14 basis points for the first nine-months of 2021 as compared to the same period in 2020. Non-interest bearing demand deposits increased $146.3 million or 15% for the third quarter of 2021 as compared to the third quarter of 2020 and increased $222.3 million or 27% for the first nine-months of 2021 as compared to the same period in 2020.
PROVISION FOR LOAN AND LEASE LOSSES
Credit risk is inherent in the business of making loans. The Company sets aside an allowance for loan and lease losses, a contra-asset account, through periodic charges to earnings which are reflected in the income statement as the provision for loan and lease losses. The Company recorded a net benefit related to loan and lease loss provision of $0.6 million in the third quarter of 2021 relative to a provision of $2.4 million in the third quarter of 2020, and a year-to-date net benefit for loan and lease loss provision of $2.5 million in 2021 as compared to $6.4 million loan and lease loss provision expense for the same period in 2020. The Company's $3.0 million, or 126%, favorable decline in provision for loan and lease losses in the third quarter of 2021 as compared to the third quarter of 2020, and the $8.8 million favorable decrease, or 139% in the first nine months of 2021 compared to the same period in 2020 is due mostly to lower historical loan loss rates, a decline in outstanding balances on loans, a change in the mix of loans, and net year-to-date 2021 recoveries of previously charged-off loan balances. During the first nine months of 2021, Management adjusted its qualitative risk factors under our current incurred loss model for improved economic conditions, improvements in the severity and volume of past due loans, and a reduction in the level of concentrations of credit in non-owner occupied real estate loans.
There was no provision for loan and lease losses, or related allowance for loan and leases losses, associated with the SBA PPP loans as those loans carry a full guarantee by the SBA, subject to the financial institution meetings its Bank Secrecy Act obligations and other diligence requirements in making such loans.
As described above, the Company was subject to the adoption in the first quarter of 2020 of the Current Expected Credit Loss ("CECL") accounting method under Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Update 2016-03 and related amendments, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326). Prior to the close of the first quarter of 2020, the Company elected under Section 4014 of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act to defer the implementation of CECL until the earlier of when the national emergency related to the outbreak of COVID-19 ends or December 31, 2020. Later in 2020, the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 extended the deferral of implementation of CECL to the earlier of the first day of the fiscal year, beginning after the national emergency terminates or January 1, 2022. The Company’s decision to defer the adoption of CECL was done primarily to provide additional time to better assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the expected lifetime credit losses. At the time the decision was made, there was a significant change in economic uncertainty on the local, regional, and national levels as a result of local and state stay-at-home orders, as well as relief measures provided at a national, state, and local level. Further, the Company has taken actions to serve our communities during the pandemic, including permitting short-term payment deferrals to current customers, as well as originating bridge loans and SBA PPP loans. Upon the adoption of CECL on January 1, 2022, the Company is expected to record the anticipated increase in the allowance for credit losses as an adjustment to equity, net of deferred taxes.
The Company has taken actions to mitigate the impact on credit losses including permitting short-term payment deferrals to current customers, as well as providing bridge loans and SBA PPP loans. As described below under Nonperforming Assets, since April 2020, the Company modified approximately $425.9 million of loans under either Section 4013 of the CARES Act or the April 7, 2020 Interagency statement that offered some practical expedients for loan modifications. These modifications generally provided for a six-month deferral of both interest and principal and the vast majority of the customers on deferral resumed making scheduled payments upon the expiration of the deferral. As of September, 30, 2021, the Company had $10.4 million in remaining loan modifications; all loans are fully secured by real estate. These deferrals had an impact on how the Company internally grades its loans and as such had an impact on the overall provision under the incurred loss method. The continued performance on these loans after the end of the deferral period could impact future provision.
Specifically identifiable and quantifiable loan losses are immediately charged off against the allowance, with subsequent recoveries reflected as an increase to the allowance. The Company recorded net charge-offs of $0.2 million in the third quarter of 2021 as compared to $0.3 million for the comparative period of 2020. For the first nine months of 2021, the Company recorded net recoveries of $0.3 million as compared to net charge-offs of $0.7 million for the same period of 2020.
The allowance for loan and lease losses is at a level that, in Management’s judgment, is adequate to absorb probable loan losses related to specifically identified impaired loans as well as probable incurred losses in the remaining loan portfolio.
The Company’s policies for monitoring the adequacy of the allowance, determining loan balances that should be charged off, and other detailed information with regard to changes in the allowance are discussed in Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements, and below, under “Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses.” The process utilized to establish an appropriate allowance for loan and lease losses can result in a high degree of variability in the Company’s loan loss provision, and consequently in our net earnings.
NONINTEREST INCOME AND NONINTEREST EXPENSE
The following table provides details on the Company’s noninterest income and noninterest expense for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2021 and 2020:
Noninterest Income/Expense
Noninterest income:
Service charges on deposit accounts
Other service charges and fees
2,900
2,511
8,511
7,418
Net gains on sale of securities available-for-sale
1,048
1,310
2,445
1,997
1,333
1,555
As a % of average interest earning assets (1)
0.96%
0.99%
0.92%
1.04%
Noninterest expense:
Occupancy costs
Furniture & equipment
406
498
1,312
1,581
Premises
1,953
2,061
6,160
Advertising and marketing costs
370
324
1,350
Data processing costs
4,409
3,365
Deposit services costs
2,402
2,236
6,752
6,261
Loan services costs
Loan processing
109
652
(19)
355
423
Other operating costs
Telephone & data communications
534
485
1,582
1,319
Postage & mail
253
264
470
1,269
1,090
Professional services costs
Legal & accounting
966
317
2,091
1,002
Other professional service
1,320
1,223
3,219
2,171
Stationery & supply costs
341
Sundry & tellers
117
478
392
2.66%
2.70%
2.68%
2.85%
Efficiency ratio (2)(3)
59.75%
53.74%
58.30%
56.64%
Noninterest Income:
Total noninterest income reflects increases of $0.4 million, or 6%, for the quarter ended September 30, 2021 as compared to the same quarter in 2020, and $0.9 million, or 4% for the year-to-date period ended September 30, 2021 as compared to the same period in 2020.
Service charges on deposit accounts increased by $0.2 million or 8%, for the quarterly comparison and decreased $0.1 million or 1%, for the year-to-date comparison. The variances for both periods were due to increases and decreases, respectively in overdraft fees, due to volume fluctuations.
Other service charges and fees increased $0.4 million or 15% for the third quarter of 2021 and $1.1 million or 15% for the first nine months of 2021 as compared to the same period in 2020. For both the quarter and the year-to-date comparisons the positive variance was due to increased check-card interchange fees due to increased usage of customer debit cards.
The Company recognized a $0.4 million gain from the sale of debt securities in the second quarter of 2020. The same gain in 2021 was very minor, thus resulting in a negative variance of $0.4 million for the first nine months of 2021 as compared to the same period in 2020.
BOLI income decreased by $0.3 million as compared to the third quarter of 2021 and increased $0.4 million for the first nine months of 2021 as compared to the same period in 2020. These variances are due mostly to fluctuations in underlying values of assets in the specific account BOLI policies that are designed to have similar assets to those in the deferred compensation plans. Thus, the higher quarterly and year-to-date values in BOLI policies are offset by higher deferred compensation expense reflected primarily in director fees expense. At September 30, 2021, there was $44.0 million in BOLI policies and $11.0 million in separate account BOLI policies associated with the deferred compensation plans.
In the “other” category of noninterest income the Company reflected a $0.1 million increase in the third quarter of 2021 as compared to the third quarter of 2020 and a $0.2 million decrease in the first nine months of 2021 as compared to the same period in 2020. The quarterly comparison includes a $0.8 million non-recurring gain resulting from the wrap-up of a low-income housing tax credit fund investment in the third quarter of 2020, partially offset by a $0.6 million favorable change in costs of the same low-income housing tax credit fund investment. A recovery of legal expenses from a prior year for $0.2 million also was recorded in the third quarter of 2021. The year-to-date comparisons were impacted by a $0.6 million favorable variance in low-income housing tax credit fund investments offset by $1.5 million in non-recurring gains in the first nine months of 2020 from the wrap up of low-income housing tax credit fund investments. The year-to-date comparison was also favorably impacted by a $0.4 million increase in the valuation of the Company’s equity investment in Pacific Coast Bankers’ Bank.
Noninterest Expense:
Total noninterest expense increased by $1.6 million, or 8%, in the third quarter of 2021 relative to the third quarter of 2020, and by $6.2 million, or 11%, in the first nine months of 2021 as compared to the same period in 2020. Noninterest expense dropped to 2.66% of average earning assets in the third quarter of 2021 down from 2.70% for the third quarter of 2020 and was 2.67% of average earning assets for the first nine months of 2021 relative to 2.85% for the same period in 2020. The tax-equivalent efficiency ratio was 59.75% in the third quarter of 2021 as compared to 53.74% in the same quarter of 2020 and was 58.30% for the first nine months of 2021 as compared to 56.64% for the same period in 2020. The efficiency ratio represents total noninterest expense divided by the sum of fully tax-equivalent net interest and noninterest income; the provision for loan losses and investment gains/losses are excluded from the equation. The Company continues to actively consider a wide variety of operational efficiency opportunities, and noninterest income enhancements, however challenges in net interest income from softening loan demand make it difficult to predict further improvements of the efficiency ratio.
Salaries and Benefits were $0.9 million, or 9%, higher in the third quarter of 2021 as compared to the third quarter of 2020 and $3.1 million, or 10%, higher for the first nine months of 2021 compared to the same period in 2020. Salary
expense deferrals related to the decrease in loan originations were primarily responsible for the negative variance; there was a decrease in salary deferrals of $0.5 million for the quarterly comparison and $2.2 million for the year-to-date comparison. There were 482 full-time equivalent employees at September 30, 2021 as compared to 491 at September 30, 2020.
Occupancy expenses were $0.2 million lower for the third quarter of 2021 as compared to the same quarter in 2020 and $0.1 million higher for the first nine months of 2021 as compared to the same period in 2020. The primary reason for decrease in the quarterly comparison was the closure of five branch facilities earlier in the year, which included the early termination of two leases immediately. The acceleration of leasehold improvements was responsible for the slight increase in the year-to-date comparison.
Other noninterest expense increased $0.9 million, or 12% for the third quarter 2021 as compared to the third quarter in 2020, and increased $3.1 million, or 17% for the first nine months of 2021 as compared to the same period in 2020. The variance for the third quarter of 2021 compared to the same period in 2020 was primarily driven by an increase of $0.6 million in legal and accounting costs due mostly to an increase in litigation costs. Additionally, there were increases of $0.3 million in data processing costs resulting from increases in core banking system expenses, and $0.4 million in increase in checkcard processing costs due to higher debit card usage. These higher costs were partially offset by a $0.4 million decrease in foreclosed assets costs, due to the sale of all but two bank owned properties. For the year-over-year comparison the categories of increase were the same as with the quarterly comparison, along with a $0.3 million increase in FDIC assessments and a $0.3 million increase in deferred compensation expense for directors, which is linked to the changes in BOLI income.
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
The Company sets aside a provision for income taxes on a monthly basis. The amount of that provision is determined by first applying the Company’s statutory income tax rates to estimated taxable income, which is pre-tax book income adjusted for permanent differences, and then subtracting available tax credits. Permanent differences include but are not limited to tax-exempt interest income, BOLI income, and certain book expenses that are not allowed as tax deductions. Our tax credits consist primarily of those generated by investments in low-income housing tax credit funds. The Company's provision for income taxes was 24.1% of pre-tax income in the third quarter of 2021 relative to 23.4% in the third quarter of 2020, and 25.0% of pre-tax income for the first nine months of 2021 relative to 23.5% for the same period in 2020. The increase in effective tax rate in the third quarter of 2021 is due to tax credits and tax-exempt income representing a smaller percentage of total taxable income.
BALANCE SHEET ANALYSIS
EARNING ASSETS
The Company’s interest earning assets are comprised of loans and investments, including overnight investments and surplus balances held in interest earning accounts in our Federal Reserve Bank account. The composition, growth characteristics, and credit quality of both of those components are significant determinants of the Company’s financial condition. Investments are analyzed in the section immediately below, while the loan and lease portfolio and other factors affecting earning assets are discussed in the sections following investments.
INVESTMENTS
The Company’s investments may at any given time consist of debt securities and marketable equity securities (together, the “investment portfolio”), investments in the time deposits of other banks, surplus interest earning balances in our
Federal Reserve Bank account, and overnight fed funds sold. The Company’s investments can serve several purposes, including the following: 1) they can provide liquidity for potential funding needs; 2) they provide a source of pledged assets for securing public deposits, bankruptcy deposits and certain borrowed funds which require collateral; 3) they constitute a large base of assets with structural characteristics that can be changed more readily than loan or deposit portfolios, as might be required for interest rate risk management purposes; 4) they are another interest earning option for the placement of surplus funds when loan demand is light; and 5) they can provide partially tax exempt income.
The investment portfolio is reflected on the balance sheet as investment securities and totaled $732.3 million, or 21% of total assets at September 30, 2021, and $544.0 million, or 17% of total assets at December 31, 2020. In addition, within the Cash and Due from Banks account on the balance sheet was $356.2 million of surplus interest earning balances in our Federal Reserve Bank account at September 30, 2021, as compared to $3.5 million at December 31, 2020. Surplus balances in our Federal Reserve Bank account and fed funds sold to correspondent banks typically represent the temporary investment of excess liquidity.
The Company carries investments at their fair market values. We currently have the intent and ability to hold our investment securities to maturity, but the securities are all marketable and are classified as “available for sale” to allow maximum flexibility with regard to interest rate risk and liquidity management. The expected average life for bonds in our investment portfolio was 4.9 years and their average effective duration was 3.2 years at September 30, 2021, up from an expected average life of 4.2 years and an average effective duration of 2.4 years at year-end 2020.
The following table sets forth the amortized cost and fair market value of Company’s investment portfolio by investment type as of the dates noted:
Investment Portfolio
Available for Sale
The net unrealized gain on our investment portfolio, or the amount by which aggregate fair market values exceeded amortized cost, was $21.3 million at September 30, 2021, a $4.9 million decrease relative to the net unrealized gain of $26.1 million at December 31, 2020. The change was caused by increased long-term market interest rates on fixed-rate bond values.
Municipal bond balances comprise 40% of our total securities portfolio (fair value) at September 30, 2021, and 42% at December 31, 2020. Municipal bonds purchased have strong underlying ratings, and we review all municipal bonds in our portfolio every quarter for potential impairment.
The corporate bonds purchased in 2021 are exclusively subordinated debentures of bank holding companies. These bonds were subject to a credit review by the credit administration department prior to their purchase and are subject to quarterly potential impairment reviews.
The purchases of collateralized loan obligations (“CLOs”) in the third quarter of 2021 is were exclusively AAA and AA rated tranches. Each purchase is subject to a credit and structure review by the credit administration department prior to their purchase and are subject to quarterly potential impairment reviews. The AAA and AA-rated CLO purchases were primarily a balance sheet diversification strategy as management continues to utilize available liquidity. In addition to
providing asset class diversification given the high level of real estate backed earning assets on the balance sheet, these floating rate CLOs are more asset sensitive which complements the longer-term fixed-rate earning assets.
Investment securities that were pledged as collateral for borrowings and/or potential borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank and the Federal Reserve Bank, customer repurchase agreements, and other purposes as required or permitted by law totaled $148.2 million at September 30, 2021 and $232.0 million at December 31, 2020, leaving $584.1 million in unpledged debt securities at September 30, 2021 and $312.0 million at December 31, 2020. Securities that were pledged in excess of actual pledging needs and were thus available for liquidity purposes, if needed, totaled $43.2 million at September 30, 2021 and $52.9 million at December 31, 2020.
LOAN AND LEASE PORTFOLIO
A distribution of the Company’s loans showing the balance and percentage of loans by type is presented for the noted periods in the table below. The balances in the table are before deferred or unamortized loan origination, extension, or commitment fees, and deferred origination costs. While not reflected in the loan totals and not currently comprising a material segment of our lending activities, the Company also occasionally originates and sells, or participates out portions of, loans to non-affiliated investors.
Loan and Lease Distribution
Percentage of Total Loans and Leases
1.62%
1.97%
1.19%
2.92%
10.29%
5.68%
1.46%
1.55%
2.60%
2.51%
16.13%
13.93%
46.54%
43.14%
5.82%
5.27%
85.65%
76.97%
2.03%
1.82%
6.18%
8.49%
5.91%
12.49%
100.00%
Gross loans and leases at $2.1 billion, reflected a decrease of $323.3 million, or 13%, at September 30, 2021 from $2.5 billion at December 31, 2020 due mostly to declines in commercial real estate and construction loan balances, outstanding balances on mortgage warehouse lines, as well as the forgiveness of SBA PPP loans.
Balances on mortgage warehouse lines were down $181.2 million or 59% during the first nine months of 2021. Mortgage warehouse utilization was 33% at September 30, 2021, as compared to 71% at December 31, 2020. Utilization of mortgage warehouse lines in the future could be impacted by fluctuations in interest rates, seasonality, and other factors affecting home purchasing or refinancing demand including economic uncertainty.
There was a net decrease of $63.0 million in real estate secured loans, primarily from construction and other commercial real estate loans as the Company strategically lowered its regulatory commercial real estate concentration ratio from 378% at December 31, 2020 to 308% at September 30, 2021, although it is expected to moderately increase this concentration ratio during the fourth quarter of 2021 and into 2022. At September 30, 2021 we have concluded that we have an acceptable and well-managed concentration in CRE lending as defined in the Interagency Guidance dated December 12, 2006. The overall decline in real estate secured loans during 2021 was partially offset by an increase of $80.4 million in 1-4 family residential real estate loans due to the $121.6 million purchase of high quality jumbo mortgage loans during the third quarter of 2021. These loan purchases were designed as a bridge to organic loan growth as the Bank’s core loan pipeline continues to improve and the hiring of one or more loan teams that is expected to occur during the fourth quarter of 2021. If successfully hired, the loan teams are anticipated to further diversify the loan portfolio by specializing in various categories of commercial and industrial loans.
The 37% decrease in Commercial and Industrial loans from $209.0 million at December 31, 2020 to $132.3 million at September 30, 2021 was primarily driven by loan forgiveness precipitated by the Company’s participation in the Small Business Administration’s PPP as authorized by the CARES Act. The Company began accepting and funding loans under this program in April 2020. There were 642 loans for $50.7 million outstanding at September 30, 2021, compared to 1,274 loans for $117.2 million at December 31, 2020. During the first nine months of 2021, the SBA forgave $117.9 million of PPP loans. The Company is working to buildout a more robust Commercial and Industrial loan origination group and platform, including small business loans, in order to complement its commitment to serving its commercial real estate customers.
NONPERFORMING ASSETS
Nonperforming assets are comprised of loans for which the Company is no longer accruing interest, in addition to foreclosed assets which is primarily OREO, but can included other foreclosed assets.
If the Company grants a concession to a borrower in financial difficulty, the loan falls into the category of a TDR, unless the modification was granted under section 4013 of the CARES Act or the April 7, 2020 Interagency Statement. TDRs may be classified as either nonperforming or performing loans depending on their underlying characteristics and
circumstances. The following table presents comparative data for the Company’s nonperforming assets and performing TDRs as of the dates noted:
Nonperforming assets and performing troubled debt restructurings
NON-ACCRUAL LOANS:
975
1,537
2,364
602
464
TOTAL REAL ESTATE
5,942
Agriculture
988
TOTAL NONPERFORMING LOANS
7,186
2,970
Total nonperforming assets
6,881
8,569
10,156
Performing TDRs (1)
5,509
11,382
7,708
Nonperforming loans as a % of total gross loans and leases
0.31%
0.30%
Nonperforming assets as a % of total gross loans and leases and foreclosed assets
0.35%
0.43%
Total nonperforming assets decreased by $1.7 million, or 20%, to $6.9 million during the first nine months of 2021. The Company's ratio of nonperforming loans to gross loans increased to 0.32% at September 30, 2021 from 0.31% at December 31, 2020; this was due to a decrease in the gross loan and lease portfolio, since nonperforming loans decreased $0.8 million during the same period. All of the Company's impaired assets are periodically reviewed and are either well-reserved based on current loss expectations or are carried at the fair value of the underlying collateral, net of expected disposition costs.
As shown in the table, we also had $5.5 million in loans classified as performing TDRs on which we were still accruing interest as of September 30, 2021, a decrease of $5.9 million, or 52%, relative to December 31, 2020.
Foreclosed assets had a carrying value of $0.1 million at September 30, 2021 comprised of 2 properties classified as OREO as compared to 7 properties for $1.0 million at December 31, 2020. All foreclosed assets are periodically evaluated and written down to their fair value less expected disposition costs, if lower than the then-current carrying value.
An action plan is in place for each of our non-accruing loans and foreclosed assets and they are all being actively managed. Collection efforts are continuously pursued for all nonperforming loans, but we cannot provide assurance that they will be resolved in a timely manner or that nonperforming balances will not increase.
The Company had $1.3 million in loans past due 30-59 days at September 30, 2021. This is a decrease of $0.8 million over the balance at December 31, 2020. All of these past due loans are under management supervision and every effort is being taken to assist the borrowers and manage credit risk in this regard.
As described above, the Company is providing loan modifications to certain customers and taking advantage of either Section 4013 of the CARES Act or the April 7, 2020 Interagency Statement, which provides that such modifications do not result in treatment of such loan as a TDR. Since April 2020, the Company modified approximately $426 million of its loans under this guidance. For the Company, these modifications typically provided a deferral of both principal and interest for 180 days. Interest continues to accrue during the deferral period. At the end of the deferral period, for term loans, payments will be applied to accrued interest first and after the accrued interest is paid in full, the loan will be re-amortized with the maturity extended. For lines of credit, the borrower must repay the accrued interest at the end of the deferral period or take out a second credit facility to repay the accrued interest. As of September 30, 2021, the Company had $10.4 million for one customer relationship remaining in loan modifications under Section 4013 of the CARES Act. The $10.4 million remaining on deferral is fully secured by real estate collateral. We monitor these loans during the deferral period and if circumstances change, we may downgrade the loan to a criticized asset. An additional modification, if necessary, could also result in the loan being treated as a TDR or classified asset. If some of the customers are not able to resume payments after the deferral period, it likely could result in higher classified and/or nonperforming assets, reversals of interest income, and/or higher charge-offs. At September 30, 2021, all of the $10.4 million in outstanding modifications already are internally graded as classified assets.
ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN AND LEASE LOSSES
The allowance for loan and lease losses, a contra-asset, is established through periodic provisions for loan and lease losses. It is maintained at a level that is considered adequate to absorb probable losses on specifically identified impaired loans, as well as probable incurred losses inherent in the remaining loan portfolio. Specifically identifiable and quantifiable losses are immediately charged off against the allowance; recoveries are generally recorded only when sufficient cash payments are received subsequent to the charge off.
As described above, the Company elected under Section 4014 of the CARES Act to defer the implementation of CECL until January 1, 2022. The Company made this election as it believed that the deferral provided additional time to better assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and related stimulus and relief efforts on the expected lifetime credit losses.
The Company’s allowance for loan and lease losses was $15.6 million at September 30, 2021, a decrease of $2.1 million, or 12%, relative to December 31, 2020 resulting from a $2.5 million loan loss benefit recorded during the first nine months of 2021, plus a $0.3 million in net recoveries during the same period. The loan loss benefit in the first nine months of 2021 was precipitated primarily by the decrease in loan balances, the impact of loan recoveries and improved historical loan loss rates.
No allowance for loan and lease losses was considered necessary for the SBA PPP loans as those loans carry a 100% guarantee under the “Paycheck Protection Program”, subject to certain diligence requirements by the issuing financial institution. For further information regarding the Company's decision to defer the implementation of CECL under Section 4014 of the CARES Act, as well as further detail on the decrease in the provision for loan and lease losses during the first nine months of 2021, please see the discussion above under Provision for Loan and Lease Losses.
The allowance for loan and lease losses was 0.73% of total loans at September 30, 2021, 0.72% at December 31, 2020 and 0.65% at September 30, 2020. The ratio of the allowance for loan and lease losses to nonperforming loans was 230.1% at September 30, 2021, relative to 233.5% at December 31, 2020 and 216.9% for September 30, 2020. Management's detailed analysis indicates that the Company's allowance for loan and lease losses should be sufficient to cover credit losses inherent in loan and lease balances outstanding as of September 30, 2021, but no assurance can be given that the Company will not experience substantial future losses relative to the size of the allowance.
A separate allowance of $0.2 million for potential losses inherent in unused commitments is included in other liabilities at September 30, 2021, as compared to $0.3 million at December 31, 2020 and September 30, 2020.
The following table summarizes activity in the allowance for loan and lease losses for the noted periods:
For the threemonths ended
For the ninemonths ended
For the year ended
September 30,
December 31,
Balances:
Average gross loans and leases outstanding during period (1)
2,068,690
Gross loans and leases outstanding at end of period
Allowance for loan and lease losses:
Balance at beginning of period
13,560
Provision charged to expense
245
327
234
606
1,137
1,397
561
1,030
1,556
1,833
(84)
(78)
198
Net loan (recoveries) charge offs
204
(329)
687
735
Balance at end of period
RATIOS
Net (recoveries) charge-offs to average loans and leases (annualized)
0.04%
(0.02)%
0.05%
Allowance for loan losses to gross loans and leases at end of period
0.73%
0.65%
0.72%
Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans
230.07%
216.89%
233.46%
Net loan (recoveries) charge-offs to allowance for loan losses at end of period
1.31%
2.08%
(2.11)%
4.41%
4.14%
Net loan (recoveries) charge-offs to provision for loan losses
(34.00)%
13.79%
13.43%
10.82%
8.60%
The Company’s allowance for loan and lease losses at September 30, 2021 represents Management’s best estimate of probable losses in the loan portfolio as of that date, but no assurance can be given that the Company will not experience substantial losses relative to the size of the allowance. Furthermore, fluctuations in credit quality, changes in economic
conditions, updated accounting or regulatory requirements, and/or other factors could induce us to augment or reduce the allowance.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
The Company maintains commitments to extend credit in the normal course of business, as long as there are no violations of conditions established in the outstanding contractual arrangements. It is unlikely that all unused commitments will ultimately be drawn down. Unused commitments to extend credit, which included standby letters of credit, totaled $540.0 million at September 30, 2021 and $449.9 million at December 31, 2020, representing approximately 25% of gross loans outstanding at September 30, 2021 and 18% at December 31, 2020. The increase in unused commitments is due in large part to the increase in unfunded commitments on mortgage warehouse lines. The Company also had undrawn FHLB letters of credit issued to customers totaling $4.9 million at both September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020. The effect on the Company’s revenues, expenses, cash flows and liquidity from the unused portion of commitments to provide credit cannot be reasonably predicted because there is no guarantee that the lines of credit will ever be used. However, the “Liquidity” section in this Form 10-Q outlines resources available to draw upon should we be required to fund a significant portion of unused commitments.
In addition to unused commitments to provide credit, the Company is utilizing a $100 million letter of credit issued by the Federal Home Loan Bank on the Company’s behalf as security for certain local agency deposits which totaled $76.2 million at September 30, 2021. That letter of credit is backed by loans that are pledged to the FHLB by the Company. For more information on the Company’s off-balance sheet arrangements, see Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements located elsewhere herein.
OTHER ASSETS
Interest earning cash balances were discussed above in the “Investments” section, but the Company also maintains a certain level of cash on hand in the normal course of business as well as non-earning deposits at other financial institutions. Our balance of cash and due from banks depends on the timing of collection of outstanding cash items (checks), the amount of cash held at our branches, and our reserve requirement among other things, and it is subject to significant fluctuations in the normal course of business. While cash flows are normally predictable within limits, those limits are fairly broad and the Company manages its short-term cash position through the utilization of overnight loans to, and borrowings from, correspondent banks, including the Federal Reserve Bank and the Federal Home Loan Bank. Should a large “short” overnight position persist for any length of time, the Company typically raises money through focused retail deposit gathering efforts or by adding brokered time deposits. If a “long” position is prevalent, we could let brokered deposits or other wholesale borrowings roll off as they mature, or we might invest excess liquidity into investments or loans, subject to the bank’s risk tolerances. The Company’s balance of non-earning cash and due from banks was $66.2 million at September 30, 2021 relative to $67.9 million at December 31, 2020.
Foreclosed assets are discussed above in the section titled “Nonperforming Assets.” Net premises and equipment decreased by $3.0 million during the first nine months of 2021, to $24.5 million. This decline was primarily a result of the closure of five branch locations in the second quarter of 2021. Goodwill was $27 million at September 30, 2021, unchanged during the first nine months of 2021. As mentioned above, the Company performed a qualitative assessment of goodwill impairment during the fourth quarter 2020 and determined that a quantitative analysis was not required. There have been no triggering events in the first nine months of 2021 that would require the Company to perform a Goodwill impairment test, however the Company will continue to monitor its Goodwill for potential impairment. Bank-owned life insurance, with a balance of $55.0 million at September 30, 2021, is discussed in detail above in the “Noninterest Income and Noninterest Expense” section.
DEPOSITS AND INTEREST BEARING LIABILITIES
DEPOSITS
Deposits represent another key balance sheet category impacting the Company’s net interest income and profitability metrics. Deposits provide liquidity to fund growth in earning assets, and the Company’s net interest margin is improved
to the extent that growth in deposits is concentrated in less volatile and typically less costly non-maturity accounts such as demand deposit accounts, NOW accounts, savings accounts, and money market demand accounts. Information concerning average balances and rates paid by deposit type is included in the Average Balances and Rates tables appearing above, in the section titled “Net Interest Income and Net Interest Margin.” A distribution of the Company’s deposits by type, showing the period-end balance and percentage of total deposits, is presented as of the dates indicated in the following table.
Deposit Distribution
Noninterest bearing demand deposits
Interest bearing demand deposits
154,773
109,938
611,050
558,407
Savings
451,248
368,420
141,348
131,232
Time
290,816
412,945
60,000
100,000
Percentage of Total Deposits
39.40%
35.95%
5.49%
4.19%
21.66%
21.28%
16.00%
14.04%
5.01%
5.00%
10.31%
15.73%
2.13%
3.81%
Deposit balances reflect net growth of $196.0 million, or 7%, during the first nine months of 2021. Time deposits were $290.8 million at September 30, 2021 as compared to $412.9 million at December 31, 2020. Brokered deposits decreased $40.0 million at September 30, 2021 to $60.0 million as compared to $100.0 million at December 31, 2020. Time deposits declined $122.1 million for the first nine months of 2021 due mostly to the non-renewal of $120.0 million in public time deposits. Non-maturity deposit growth of $358.2 million for the first nine months of 2021 was primarily the result of increases in balances of existing customers as the total number of customers was relatively unchanged.
Management is of the opinion that a relatively high level of core customer deposits is one of the Company’s key strengths, and we continue to strive for core deposit retention and growth. In particular, the Company’s ratio of noninterest-bearing deposits to total deposits was 39.4% at September 30, 2021 as compared to 36.0% at December 31, 2020.
OTHER INTEREST-BEARING LIABILITIES
The Company’s non-deposit borrowings may, at any given time, include fed funds purchased from correspondent banks, borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank, advances from the Federal Reserve Bank, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, and/or junior subordinated debentures. The Company uses short-term FHLB advances and fed funds purchased on uncommitted lines to support liquidity needs created by seasonal deposit flows, to temporarily satisfy funding needs from increased loan demand, and for other short-term purposes. The FHLB line is committed, but the amount of available credit depends on the level of pledged collateral.
Total non-deposit interest-bearing liabilities decreased by $40.1 million, or 18%, during the first nine months of 2021 primarily due to a decrease in federal funds purchased and borrowings from the FHLB. Repurchase agreements totaled $92.6 million at September 30, 2021 relative to a balance of $39.1 million at year-end 2020. Repurchase agreements
represent “sweep accounts”, where certain customers have elected to have their commercial deposit balances above a specified threshold transferred at the close of each business day into non-deposit investments accounts. The balance in the investment account is used to have the customer purchase securities or a perfected interest in specifically identified pledged securities from the bank, which are then repurchased by the bank from the customer the next business day.
Long term debt increased to $49.2 million from the issuance of $50 million in 3.25% fixed – floating subordinated debt with a ten-year maturity in the third quarter of 2021. The Company’s Board approved a $25 million contribution of additional capital to the Bank in the fourth quarter of 2021. The Company plans to utilize the remainder of the funds for general corporate purposes, which may include repurchasing shares, among other things.
The Company had junior subordinated debentures totaling $35.3 million and $35.1 million at September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively, in the form of long-term borrowings from trust subsidiaries formed specifically to issue trust preferred securities.
OTHER NONINTEREST BEARING LIABILITIES
Other liabilities are principally comprised of operating lease right-of-use liabilities, accrued interest payable, other accrued but unpaid expenses, and certain clearing amounts. The Company’s balance of other liabilities was $80.6 million at September 30, 2021 as compared to $35.1 million at December 31, 2020. The $45.5 million increase in the first nine months of 2021 was attributed to a forward settling investment securities accrual.
LIQUIDITY AND MARKET RISK MANAGEMENT
LIQUIDITY
Liquidity management refers to the Company’s ability to maintain cash flows that are adequate to fund operations and meet other obligations and commitments in a timely and cost-effective manner. Detailed cash flow projections are reviewed by Management on a monthly basis, with various stress scenarios applied to assess our ability to meet liquidity needs under unusual or adverse conditions. Liquidity ratios are also calculated and reviewed on a regular basis. While those ratios are merely indicators and are not measures of actual liquidity, they are closely monitored, and we are committed to maintaining adequate liquidity resources to draw upon should unexpected needs arise.
The Company, on occasion, experiences cash needs as the result of loan growth, deposit outflows, asset purchases or liability repayments. To meet these short-term needs, we can borrow overnight funds from other financial institutions, draw advances via Federal Home Loan Bank lines of credit, or solicit brokered deposits if customer deposits are not immediately obtainable from local sources.
At September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, the Company had the following sources of primary and secondary liquidity ($ in thousands):
Primary and secondary liquidity sources
Unpledged investment securities
584,066
311,983
Excess pledged securities
43,246
52,892
FHLB borrowing availability
773,125
535,404
Unsecured lines of credit
305,000
230,000
Funds available through fed discount window
61,867
58,127
Totals
2,189,654
1,259,823
In addition to the above sources, the Company could obtain brokered deposits, obtain deposits via deposit listing services, or offer higher rate time deposits within our market.
The significant increase in cash and cash equivalents during 2021 is due mostly to continued deposit growth coupled with decreases in loans, but partially offset by increases in investments. Utilization of this excess liquidity is expected to
come from a combination of new loans, including loan purchases, and new investment purchases. In addition, it is possible that a portion of the deposits built-up during the COVID-19 pandemic could be withdrawn by customers. When looking to reduce these low-yielding cash balances with earning assets, management considers interest rate risk, including duration and extension risk; credit risk; and the liquidity risk of such alternative assets.
The Company performs regular stress tests on its liquidity and at this time, believes that we have sufficient primary and secondary liquidity sources for operations.
The Company has a higher level of actual balance sheet liquidity than might otherwise be the case, since we utilize a letter of credit from the FHLB rather than investment securities for certain pledging requirements. That letter of credit, which is backed by loans pledged to the FHLB by the Company, totaled $100 million at September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020. Other sources of liquidity include the brokered deposit market, deposit listing services, and the ability to offer local time-deposit campaigns. Management is of the opinion that available investments and other potentially liquid assets, along with standby funding sources it has arranged, are more than sufficient to meet the Company’s current and anticipated short-term liquidity needs and that its liquidity has not been adversely impacted by COVID-19.
The Company’s net loans to assets and available investments to assets ratios were 62.08% and 28.57%, respectively, at September 30, 2021, as compared to internal policy guidelines of “less than 78%” and “greater than 3%.” Other liquidity ratios reviewed periodically by Management and the Board include net loans to total deposits and wholesale funding to total assets, including ratios and sub-limits for the various components comprising wholesale funding, which were all well within policy guidelines at September 30, 2021. The Company has been able to maintain a robust liquidity position in recent periods, but no assurance can be provided that our liquidity position will continue at current strong levels.
The holding company’s primary uses of funds include operating expenses incurred in the normal course of business, interest on trust preferred securities and subordinated debt, shareholder dividends, and share repurchases. Its primary source of funds is dividends from the Bank, since the holding company does not conduct regular banking operations, however the holding company did raise $50 million in cash from the issuance of subordinated debt in the third quarter of 2021. As of September 30, 2021, the holding company maintained a cash balance of $53.7 million, but expects to contribute $25.0 million in capital to the Bank in the fourth quarter of 2021. Management anticipates that with the available cash on hand remaining after the capital infusion to the Bank, the holding company still has sufficient liquidity to meet its funding requirements for the foreseeable future. Both the holding company and the Bank are subject to legal and regulatory limitations on dividend payments, as outlined in Item 5(c) Dividends in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020 which was filed with the SEC.
INTEREST RATE RISK MANAGEMENT
Market risk arises from changes in interest rates, exchange rates, commodity prices and equity prices. The Company does not engage in the trading of financial instruments, nor does it have exposure to currency exchange rates. Our market risk exposure is primarily that of interest rate risk, and we have established policies and procedures to monitor and limit our earnings and balance sheet exposure to changes in interest rates. The principal objective of interest rate risk management is to manage the financial components of the Company’s balance sheet in a manner that will optimize the risk/reward equation for earnings and capital under a variety of interest rate scenarios.
To identify areas of potential exposure to interest rate changes, we utilize commercially available modeling software to perform monthly earnings simulations and calculate the Company’s market value of portfolio equity under varying interest rate scenarios. The model imports relevant information for the Company’s financial instruments and incorporates Management’s assumptions on pricing, duration, and optionality for anticipated new volumes. Various rate scenarios consisting of key rate and yield curve projections are then applied in order to calculate the expected effect of a given interest rate change on interest income, interest expense, and the value of the Company’s financial instruments. The rate projections can be shocked (an immediate and parallel change in all base rates, up or down), ramped (an incremental increase or decrease in rates over a specified time period), economic (based on current trends and econometric models) or stable (unchanged from current actual levels).
In addition to a stable rate scenario, which presumes that there are no changes in interest rates, we typically use at least eight other interest rate scenarios in conducting our rolling 12-month net interest income simulations: upward shocks of 100, 200, 300, and 400 basis points, and downward shocks of 100, 200, and 300 basis points. Those scenarios may be supplemented, reduced in number, or otherwise adjusted as determined by Management to provide the most meaningful simulations considering economic conditions and expectations at the time. Given the current near zero interest rate environment it is unlikely that rates could decline much further beyond the downward shock of 100 basis points, therefore the downward shock scenarios of 200, 300, and 400 basis points are temporarily being suspended after concurrence by the Company’s Board of Directors. Pursuant to policy guidelines, we generally attempt to limit the projected decline in net interest income relative to the stable rate scenario to no more than 5% for a 100 basis point (bp) interest rate shock, 10% for a 200 bp shock, 15% for a 300 bp shock, and 20% for a 400 bp shock.
The Company had the following estimated net interest income sensitivity profiles over one-year, without factoring in any potential negative impact on spreads resulting from competitive pressures or credit quality deterioration:
Immediate change in Interest Rates (basis points)
% Change in Net Interest Income
$ Change in Net Interest Income
+400
16.1%
17,379
(0.4)%
(367)
+300
13.2%
14,317
0.1%
131
+200
9.8%
10,592
0.7%
677
+100
5.7%
6,188
0.9%
968
Base
-100
(11.0)%
(11,936)
(5.8)%
(5,948)
For the period ended September 30, 2021, management believes that the Company was asset sensitive, with net income increasing in a rising rate environment in all scenarios but declining considerably in the down shocks. For period ended September 30, 2020, management believed that the Company was generally asset sensitive, with overall sensitivity declining with larger rate shocks and declining overall in the down shock and up 400 basis point shock. The change in the magnitude of the Company’s asset sensitivity based on its interest rate risk model at September 30, 2021 as compared to September 30, 2020, is due mostly to the level of overnight cash held as an interest bearing deposit at the Federal Reserve Bank. At September 30, 2021, the Company had $356.2 million in overnight cash with the Federal Reserve Bank compared to $3.5 million at September 30, 2020. As this cash is held overnight, any change in interest rate in the model would increase the yield on such overnight cash immediately, therefore, increasing the Company’s asset sensitivity.
The simulation for the period ending September 30, 2021 indicates that the Company’s net interest income will increase over the next 12 months in a rising rate environment in all scenarios, but a continued drop in interest rates could have a substantial negative impact. As described above, the rate of increase is significantly greater than the September 30, 2020 scenario due to considerably more cash on hand, and to a lesser extent the impact of interest rate increases on loans with variable and adjustable-rate characteristics. In the up 400 basis point shock scenario, expected net interest income over the next twelve months increases $17.4 million, or 16%, to $125.5 million at September 30, 2021 compared to a 0.4% decrease or $0.4 million for the same period in 2020. The reason that the modeled asset level of asset sensitivity declined at September 30, 2020 with each increase in the parallel rate shock is because of the level of overnight borrowing at such date. With each subsequently larger rate shock, the cost of overnight borrowing increased more than the modeled increase in earning asset rates which caused the level of sensitivity to decline as the rate shocks increased in magnitude at September 30, 2020.
Over the next twelve months, surplus cash is projected to decline due to expected earning asset purchases and core loan growth as our pipelines begin to increase. Further, a portion of the significant increase in deposits during the COVID-19 pandemic could be withdrawn by customers. These expected changes in earnings assets, including overnight cash, are not modeled in the immediate rate shock model described above. Although the cost of interest-bearing liabilities will also increase in a rate shock, the deposit betas utilized in the interest rate model mitigate the magnitude of a deposit rate increase.
61
If there was an immediate downward adjustment, it is anticipated that interest income would decline. The reason for the drop in net interest income is because most deposit products are at or below their modeled floors of 0.10% and cannot be re-priced lower, while non-floored interest earning assets such as loans and securities can theoretically still be re-priced lower in a falling rate environment. Due to the historically low current rate environment, we view any material interest rate reductions as unlikely in the near term. However, the potential percentage drop in net interest income in the “down 100 basis points” interest rate scenario exceeds our internal policy guidelines and we will continue to monitor our interest rate risk profile and implement remedial changes if deemed appropriate.
If there was an immediate downward adjustment of 100 basis points in interest rates, net interest income would drop $8.3 million or a negative variance of 8%. The reason for the drop in net interest income is, most deposit products are at their floors of 0.10% and cannot be re-priced lower, while non-floored interest earning assets such as loans and securities can theoretically still be re-priced lower in a falling rate environment. Due to the historically low current rate environment, we view any material interest rate reductions as unlikely in the near term. However, the potential percentage drop in net interest income in the “down 100 basis points” interest rate scenario exceeds our internal policy guidelines and we will continue to monitor our interest rate risk profile and implement remedial changes if deemed appropriate.
In addition to the net interest income simulations shown above, we run stress scenarios for the unconsolidated Bank where we model the possibility of no balance sheet growth, the potential runoff of “surge” core deposits which flowed into the Bank in the most recent economic cycle, and unfavorable movement in deposit rates relative to yields on earning assets (i.e., higher deposit betas). When a static balance sheet and a stable interest rate environment are assumed, projected annual net interest income is $13.4 million lower than in our standard simulation.
The modeled economic value (or “fair value”) of financial instruments on the Company’s balance sheet will also vary under the interest rate scenarios previously discussed. The difference between the projected fair value of the Company’s financial assets and the fair value of its financial liabilities is referred to as the economic value of equity (“EVE”), and changes in EVE under different interest rate scenarios are effectively a gauge of the Company’s longer-term exposure to interest rate fluctuations. Fair values for financial instruments are estimated by discounting projected cash flows (principal and interest) at anticipated replacement interest rates for each account type, while the fair value of non-financial accounts is assumed to equal their book value for all rate scenarios. An economic value simulation is a static measure utilizing balance sheet accounts at a given point in time, and the measurement can change substantially over time, as is evident in the tables below for the periods ending September 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively, as the Company’s balance sheet evolves and interest rate and yield curve assumptions are updated.
The change in economic value under different interest rate scenarios depends on the characteristics of each class of financial instrument, including stated interest rates or spreads relative to current or projected market-level interest rates or spreads, the likelihood of principal prepayments, whether contractual interest rates are fixed or floating, and the average remaining time to maturity. As a general rule, fixed-rate financial assets become more valuable in declining rate scenarios and less valuable in rising rate scenarios, while fixed-rate financial liabilities gain in value as interest rates rise and lose value as interest rates decline. The longer the duration of the financial instrument, the greater the impact a rate change will have on its value. In our economic value simulations, estimated prepayments are factored in for financial instruments with stated maturity dates, and decay rates for non-maturity deposits are projected based on historical patterns and Management’s best estimates.
Our EVE increased in the past twelve months due to asset and deposit growth. The tables below show estimated changes in the Company’s EVE as modeled under different interest rate scenarios relative to a base case of current interest rates:
% Change in Fair Value of Equity
$ Change in Fair Value of Equity
38.1%
218,354
33.5%
175,998
35.7%
204,153
30.1%
158,018
29.9%
171,390
24.2%
127,038
17.6%
100,607
14.4%
75,619
(23.1)%
(132,270)
(7.9)%
(41,602)
The table shows that our EVE is modeled to deteriorate in moderate declining rate scenarios but should benefit from a parallel shift upward in the yield curve. The rate of increase in EVE accelerates the higher interest rates rise. This increase in sensitivity is caused by the increase in gross deposits, namely, an increase in noninterest bearing deposits. We also run stress scenarios for the unconsolidated Bank’s EVE to simulate the possibility of adverse movement in loan prepayment rates, unfavorable changes in deposit rates, and higher deposit decay rates. Model results are highly sensitive to changes in assumed decay rates for non-maturity deposits, in particular, with material unfavorable variances occurring relative to the standard simulations shown above as decay rates are increased. Furthermore, while not as
62
extreme as the variances produced by increasing non-maturity deposit decay rates, EVE also displays a relatively high level of sensitivity to unfavorable changes in deposit rate betas in rising interest rate scenarios.
CAPITAL RESOURCES
The Company had total shareholders’ equity of $364.5 million at September 30, 2021, comprised of $114.1 million in common stock, $3.7 million in additional paid-in capital, $231.7 million in retained earnings, and accumulated other comprehensive income of $15.0 million. At the end of 2020, total shareholders’ equity was $343.9 million. The increase during the first nine months of 2021 is due to the addition of capital from net income, stock options exercised and restricted stock accrued. These positive changes were partially offset by a $3.4 million unfavorable swing in accumulated other comprehensive income, net and the impact of cash dividends paid. The Company approved a new share repurchase program (the 2021 Share Repurchase Plan) on October 21, 2021 and authorized one million shares to be repurchased under this plan. The previous 2003 Share Repurchase Plan was cancelled and the 268,301 shares remaining in that plan were incorporated into the 2021 Share Repurchase Plan. No shares have been repurchased year-to-date under either plan.
The Company uses a variety of measures to evaluate its capital adequacy, including the leverage ratio which is calculated separately for the Company and the Bank. Management reviews these capital measurements on a quarterly basis and takes appropriate action to help ensure that they meet or surpass established internal and external guidelines. As permitted by the regulators for financial institutions that are not deemed to be “advanced approaches” institutions, the Company has elected to opt out of the Basel III requirement to include accumulated other comprehensive income in risk-based capital. The following table sets forth the Bank’s regulatory capital ratios as of the dates indicated.
Regulatory Capital Ratios
Minimum
Requirement
Required
to be
Community Bank
Well Capitalized (2)
Leverage Ratio (1) (3)
Bank of the Sierra
Tier 1 Capital to Adjusted Average Assets ("Leverage Ratio")
10.66
%
10.12
5.00
8.50
The federal banking agencies published a final rule on November 13, 2019, that provided a simplified measure of capital adequacy for qualifying community banking organizations. A qualifying community banking organization that opts into the community bank leverage ratio framework and maintains a leverage ratio greater than 9 percent will be considered to have met the minimum capital requirements, the capital ratio requirements for the well capitalized category under the Prompt Corrective Action framework, and any other capital or leverage requirements to which the qualifying banking organization is subject. A qualifying community banking organization with a leverage ratio of greater than 9 percent may opt into the community bank leverage ratio framework if has average consolidated total assets of less than $10 billion, has off-balance-sheet exposures of 25% or less of total consolidated assets, and has total trading assets and trading liabilities of 5 percent or less of total consolidated assets. Further, the bank must not be an advance approaches banking organization.
The final rule became effective January 1, 2020 and banks that meet the qualifying criteria can elect to use the community bank leverage framework starting with the quarter ended March 31, 2020. The CARES Act reduced the required community bank leverage ratio to 8% until the earlier of December 31, 2020, or the national emergency is declared over. Beginning in 2021 the CBLR was increased to 8.5% for the calendar year with the CBLR increasing to 9% on January 1, 2022. The federal bank regulatory agencies adopted an interim final rule to implement this change from the CARES Act. At September 30, 2021, the Company and the Bank met the criteria outlined in the final rule and the interim final rule and elected to measure capital adequacy under the CBLR framework.
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 3
QUALITATIVE & QUANTITATIVE DISCLOSURES
ABOUT MARKET RISK
The information concerning quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk is included in Part I, Item 2 above. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Liquidity and Market Risk Management.”
Item 4
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer, after evaluating the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this report (the “Evaluation Date”) have concluded that as of the Evaluation Date, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were adequate and effective to ensure that material information relating to the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries would be made known to them by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report was being prepared.
Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our Management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure, and that such information is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified by the SEC.
Changes in Internal Controls
There were no significant changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting that occurred in the first nine months of 2021 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1: LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Company and the Bank are defendants, from time to time, in legal proceedings in various points of the legal process arising from transactions conducted in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of Management, in consultation with legal counsel, it is not probable that current legal actions will results in an unfavorable outcome that has a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial condition, results of operations. Comprehensive income, or cash flows. In the event that such legal action results in an unfavorable outcome, the resulting liability could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations, comprehensive income, or cash flows.
ITEM 1A: RISK FACTORS
There were no material changes from the risk factors disclosed in the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020.
ITEM 2: UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
(c) Stock Repurchases
In October 2021 the Board approved the 2021 Share Repurchase Plan by authorizing 1,000,000 shares of common stock for repurchase. In conjunction with this action, the Board terminated the current Share Repurchase Plan which authorized 500,000 shares of common stock for repurchase. There were 268,301 shares remaining for repurchase under the current Share Repurchase Plan. Those remaining shares were rolled into the 2021 Share Repurchase Plan. There have been no stock repurchase transactions since March 2020, however under the new 2021 Share Repurchase Plan the Company plans to commence repurchases of shares in the fourth quarter of 2021.
The following table provides information concerning the Company’s stock repurchase transactions during the third quarter of 2021:
Stock Repurchases
July 31, 2021
August 31, 2021
Total shares repurchased (1)
12,122
Average per share price
N/A
24.12
Number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announced plan or program
Maximum number of shares remaining for purchase under a plan or program
268,301
ITEM 3: DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
Not applicable
ITEM 4: MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
ITEM 5: OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 6: EXHIBITS
Exhibit #
Description
3.1
Restated Articles of Incorporation of Sierra Bancorp (1)
3.2
Amended and Restated By-laws of Sierra Bancorp (2)
4.1
Description of Securities (3)
4.2
3.25% Fixed to Floating Subordinated Debt issued September 24, 2021 (4)
10.1
Salary Continuation Agreement for Kenneth R. Taylor (5)*
10.2
Split Dollar Agreement for Kenneth R. Taylor (6)*
10.3
Director Retirement and Split dollar Agreements Effective October 1, 2002, for Albert Berra, Morris Tharp, and Gordon Woods (6)*
10.4
401 Plus Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan (6)*
10.5
Indenture dated as of March 17, 2004 between U.S. Bank N.A., as Trustee, and Sierra Bancorp, as Issuer (7)
10.6
Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust of Sierra Statutory Trust II, dated as of March 17, 2004 (7)
10.7
Indenture dated as of June 15, 2006 between Wilmington Trust Co., as Trustee, and Sierra Bancorp, as Issuer (8)
10.8
Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust of Sierra Capital Trust III, dated as of June 15, 2006 (8)
10.9
2007 Stock Incentive Plan (9)
10.10
Sample Retirement Agreement Entered into with Each Non-Employee Director Effective January 1, 2007 (10)*
10.11
Salary Continuation Agreement for Kevin J. McPhaill (10)*
First Amendment to the Salary Continuation Agreement for Kenneth R. Taylor (10)*
10.13
Second Amendment to the Salary Continuation Agreement for Kenneth R. Taylor (11)*
10.14
First Amendment to the Salary Continuation Agreement for Kevin J. McPhaill (12)*
10.15
Indenture dated as of September 20, 2007 between Wilmington Trust Co., as Trustee, and Coast Bancorp, as Issuer (13)
10.16
Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust of Coast Bancorp Statutory Trust II, dated as of September 20, 2007 (13)
10.17
First Supplemental Indenture dated as of July 8, 2016, between Wilmington Trust Co. as Trustee, Sierra Bancorp as the “Successor Company”, and Coast Bancorp (13)
10.18
2017 Stock Incentive Plan (14)*
10.19
Employment agreements dated as of December 27, 2018 for Kevin McPhaill, CEO and Michael Olague, Chief Banking Officer (15)*
10.20
Employment agreement dated as of March 15, 2019 for Matthew Macia, Chief Risk Officer (16)*
10.21
Employment agreement dated as of November 15, 2019 for Christopher Treece, Chief Financial Officer (17)*
10.22
Employment agreement dated as of January 17, 2020 for Jennifer Johnson, Chief Administrative Officer (18)*
10.23
Employment agreement dated as of December 14, 2020 for Hugh Boyle, Chief Credit Officer (19)*
10.24
Form Indemnification Agreement dated as of January 28, 2021 for Directors and Executive Officers (20)*
31.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer (Section 302 Certification)
31.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer (Section 302 Certification)
Certification of Periodic Financial Report (Section 906 Certification)
101.INS
XBRL Instance Document - the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.
101.SCH
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
Cover Page Interactive Data File - The cover page interactive data file does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.
*Indicates management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized:
November 4, 2021
/s/ Kevin J. McPhaill
Date
Kevin J. McPhaill
President & Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ Christopher G. Treece
Christopher G. Treece
Chief Financial Officer
/s/ Cindy L. Dabney
Cindy L. Dabney
Principal Accounting Officer