AT&T Inc. is a North American telecommunications company. In addition to telephone, data and video telecommunications, AT&T also provides mobile communications and internet services for companies, private customers and government organizations. AT&T has long had a monopoly in the United States and Canada.
United StatesSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWashington, D.C. 20549
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002
or
For the transition period from toCommission File Number 1-8610
Incorporated under the laws of the State of DelawareI.R.S. Employer Identification Number 43-1301883175 E. Houston, San Antonio, Texas 78205Telephone Number: (210) 821-4105
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No
At June 30, 2002, 3,325,083,647 common shares were outstanding.
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
SELECTED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA
*Amounts represent 100% of the customers of Cingular Wireless (Cingular). The 2001 amount also includes the customers of Cellular Communications of Puerto Rico, which was contributed by us to Cingular in September 2001.#The prior year employee count includes approximately 16,000 employees that became Cingular employees on or before December 31, 2001.
SBC COMMUNICATIONS INC.JUNE 30, 2002
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)Dollars in millions except per share amounts
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
2. DISPOSITION
3. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
4. EARNINGS PER SHARE
5. SEGMENT INFORMATION
Segment results, including a reconciliation to SBC consolidated results, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001 are as follows:
6. SUBSIDIARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
7. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsDollars in millions except per share amounts
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Throughout this document, SBC Communications Inc. is referred to as we or SBC. A reference to a Note in this section refers to the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Overview Our financial results in the second quarter and for the first six months of 2002 and 2001 are summarized as follows:
Our reported operating revenues were lower in the second quarter of 2002 primarily due to the weak United States (U.S.) economy and increased competition, including a significant increase in Unbundled Network Element-Platform (UNE-P) based competition, which also contributed to the decline in operating income. See Regulatory and Competitive Environment sections for further discussion of UNE-P. Reported revenues were also lower due to sales of nonstrategic assets during 2001, partially offset by changes in the timing of directory publications. Our reported operating expenses increased in the second quarter due to a force-reduction charge and additional reserves for bad debt as a result of the July 2002 WorldCom, Inc. (WorldCom) bankruptcy filing, both of which are described below, partially offset by the FAS 142 effect noted below. As a result, our operating income declined 26.6% in the second quarter, and excluding the FAS 142 impact, our operating income would have declined 27.9%.
The second quarter and first six months of 2001 include amortization expense related to goodwill and Federal Communications Commission (FCC) wireless licenses, which are no longer amortized under FAS 142. If applied retroactively, this accounting change would have decreased the second quarter and first six months of 2001 operating expenses by approximately $54 and $110, increased equity in net income of affiliates by approximately $88 and $174, and increased income before extraordinary item and cumulative effect of accounting change by approximately $115 and $232, or $0.04 and $0.07 per share.
Results Before Special Items
For internal management reporting purposes, we exclude (i.e., normalize) special items from our results and analyze them separately. The net effect of excluding the normalizing items was to increase net income by $186 in the second quarter and for the first six months of 2002, and to decrease net income by $6 in the second quarter and $131 for the first six months of 2001. In addition to the normalizing items, for internal management purposes, we include the 60% proportional consolidation of Cingular in our normalized results. The proportional consolidation of Cingular changes our normalized revenues, expenses, operating income and nonoperating items, but does not change our net income. The following table summarizes our normalized results for the second quarter and first six months of 2002 and 2001.
Normalized results for 2002 excluded the following special items:
Normalized results for 2001 excluded the following special items:
In addition, our normalized results in the second quarter and for the first six months of 2001 include amortization expense related to goodwill and FCC licenses which are no longer amortized under FAS 142. If applied retroactively, this accounting change would have decreased the second quarter and first six months of 2001 normalized operating expenses by approximately $87 and $178, increased equity in net income of affiliates by approximately $55 and $106, and increased income before extraordinary item and cumulative effect of accounting change by approximately $115 and $232, or $0.03 and $0.07 per share.
Normalized operating revenues decreased in the second quarter of 2002 due to the same factors that impacted reported operating revenues, partially offset by an increase in our proportionate share of Cingulars revenues. Normalized operating expenses decreased in the second quarter of 2002 primarily due to cost savings from employee reductions and the FAS 142 effect noted above.
Excluding the FAS 142 impact, our normalized diluted earnings per share, before extraordinary item and cumulative effect of accounting change in the second quarter and for the first six months of 2002 would have declined 4.7% and 6.7%, while normalized operating income would have declined 9.0% and 7.5%, in the same periods. Our normalized diluted earnings per share was favorably impacted by a decreasing effective tax rate and a decline in our weighted average common shares outstanding.
Segment Results
The following tables show components of normalized results of operations by segment. A discussion of significant segment results is also presented. Intercompany interest affects the segment results of operations but is not discussed as it is eliminated in consolidation. The consolidated results section discusses interest expense, interest income, other income (expense) - net and income taxes.
In the second quarter of 2002, we began reporting product-based revenue categories for this segment. The new categories, voice, data and long-distance voice, provide a simpler, clearer presentation of our revenues that is more closely aligned with how we currently manage the business.
We account for our 60% economic interest in Cingular under the equity method of accounting in our Consolidated Financial Statements. However, in the table above we use proportional consolidation in order to evaluate the results of Cingular for internal management purposes. We also include our proportionate share of depreciation and amortization expense from the Cingular-VoiceStream Wireless Corporation (VoiceStream) network sharing agreement, which Cingular accounts for on the equity method of accounting. The table above also includes our residual wireless properties that we hold which have not been contributed to Cingular.
Our other segment results in the second quarter and for the first six months of 2002 primarily consist of corporate and other operations. The second quarter and the first six months of 2001 primarily include the results of our Ameritech cable television operations prior to its November 2001 sale.
Consolidated Results
Interest expense decreased $85, or 20.0%, in the second quarter and $194, or 21.9%, for the first six months of 2002. Approximately one-half of the decrease was due to interest accrued in 2001 on payables of approximately $2,500 to Cingular. These payables were netted with our notes receivable from Cingular late in the second quarter of 2001. The remaining decrease was primarily related to lower composite rates on commercial paper.
Interest income decreased $45, or 23.3%, in the second quarter and $81, or 21.8%, for the first six months of 2002. The decrease was primarily related to lower income accrued on notes receivable from Cingular that were netted with notes payable to Cingular which is discussed in Interest Expense. The income accrued from Cingular does not have a material impact on our net income because the interest income is mostly offset when we record our share of equity income in Cingular.
Other income (expense) - net includes items that we normalized as previously described in the Overview section. These normalizing items totaled $173 in the second quarter and $187 for the first six months of 2002, and $265 in the second quarter and $295 for the first six months of 2001. In addition to those items, results in the second quarter and the first six months of 2002 included gains on the sale of investments of approximately $59 and $149, consisting of the sale of shares of Telmex, América Móvil S.A. de C.V. (América Móvil) and Amdocs Limited (Amdocs). These gains were partially offset by charges of approximately $12 in the second quarter and for the first six months related to the permanent declines in the value of cost investments and $75 for the first six months related to the decrease in value of our investment in Williams and a loss on the sale of our webhosting operations.
The second quarter and first six months of 2001 included gains on the sale of investments of approximately $95 and $224, consisting of the sale of Amdocs shares and other investments. These gains were partially offset by minority interest and dividends paid on preferred securities issued by Ameritech subsidiaries of approximately $26 in the second quarter and $47 for the first six months of 2001. The second quarter also included gains of approximately $46 recognized for market adjustments on shares of Amdocs, which were used for deferred compensation. An offsetting deferred compensation expense was recorded in operations and support expense. Additionally, in the first six months of 2001, we recognized an expense of approximately $581 related to an endowment of Amdocs shares to the SBC Foundation and income of approximately $575 from the related mark to market adjustment on the Amdocs shares, for a net expense of $6.
Income taxes decreased $263, or 23.0%, in the second quarter and $444, or 20.5%, for the first six months of 2002 and reflect the tax effect of normalizing items previously described in the Overview section. Income taxes were lower due primarily to lower income and a decrease in our effective tax rate. Our effective tax rate was 32.3% in the second quarter and 32.6% for the first six months in 2002, as compared to 35.5% in the second quarter and 35.4% for the first six months of 2001. This lower effective tax rate is primarily related to lower state taxes, increased realization of foreign tax credits and adoption of FAS 142, which eliminates the amortization of goodwill.
Extraordinary Item The second quarter of 2001 includes an extraordinary loss of $8, ($14 pre-tax, with taxes of $6) related to the early redemption of approximately $500 of our TOPrS. The first six months of 2001 includes an extraordinary loss of $18, ($28 pre-tax, with taxes of $10) related to the early redemption of approximately $1,000 of our TOPrS. See Note 1.
Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change On January 1, 2002, we adopted FAS 142. Adoption of FAS 142 means that we stop amortizing goodwill and at least annually, we must test the remaining book value of goodwill for impairment. Any future impairments will be recorded in operating expenses. During the first quarter of 2002 we performed the initial impairment test of goodwill under FAS 142 and determined that goodwill related to our investment in Sterling Commerce Inc. (Sterling) was impaired by $1,791. During the second quarter of 2002, Cingular completed their analyses of their goodwill and other unamortizable intangibles under FAS 142. They determined that an impairment existed. Our portion of the impairment was $19. As a result, our first-quarter 2002 net loss was changed from a net loss of $81, or $0.02 per share, to a net loss of $100, or $0.03 per share. We expect that our international holdings will complete their analysis later in the year. Any FAS 142 impairment resulting from that analyses will be reflected as a cumulative effect of accounting change at January 1, 2002 and will require us to change the first quarter of 2002 results. See Note 1.
COMPETITIVE AND REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT
Overview Passage of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 was intended to deregulate U.S. telecommunications markets. Despite passage of this Act, the telecommunications industry, particularly incumbent local exchange carriers such as our wireline subsidiaries, and advanced services including DSL, continue to operate under heavy regulation. The expected transition from an industry extensively regulated by multiple regulatory bodies to a market-driven industry monitored by state and federal agencies has not occurred as anticipated. Our wireline subsidiaries remain subject to extensive regulation by state regulatory commissions for intrastate services and by the FCC for interstate services. For example, certain state commissions, including those in California, Illinois, Michigan, Ohio and Indiana, have significantly lowered the rates we are allowed to charge competitors for leasing parts of our network (unbundled network elements, or UNEs). When UNEs are combined by incumbent local exchange carriers into a complete set capable of providing total local service to a customer, then they are referred to as an UNE-Platform, (UNE-P). These mandated rates, which are below our cost, are resulting in increased competition in some states, particularly for the most profitable customers, and significantly contributing to continuing declines in our access-line revenues and profitability. If this trend were to continue, we could experience additional and more significant declines in access-line revenues, which, in turn, could reduce returns on our invested capital and compel us to further reduce capital expenditures and employee levels.
This continuing difficult and uncertain regulatory environment combined with the downturn in the U.S. economy and increasing local competition from multiple wireline and wireless providers in various markets presents significant challenges for our business. A summary of significant second quarter 2002 regulatory developments follows.
Interconnection In May 2002, the United States Supreme Court (Supreme Court) upheld FCC UNE pricing rules that govern the rates incumbent local exchange carriers, such as our wireline subsidiaries, charge competitors for interconnection and for leasing portions of the incumbents telephone networks. The FCC rules require incumbents to charge competitors rates based on lower, hypothetical costs that competitors would incur for building a new, most efficient telephone network rather than on incumbents historical, incurred costs, which are higher. The Supreme Court also upheld FCC rules requiring incumbents to perform the functions necessary to combine unbundled network elements for competitors when they are unable to perform the combination themselves or unaware that they need to combine elements to provide a telecommunications service.
Unbundled Network Elements/Line Sharing In May 2002, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (Court of Appeals) granted petitions filed by several incumbents, including our wireline subsidiaries, and the United States Telecom Association to remand and vacate the FCCs UNE Remand and Line Sharing Orders. The UNE Remand Order expanded the definition of UNEs and required incumbents, such as our wireline subsidiaries, to lease a variety of UNEs to competitors. The Line Sharing Order required incumbents to share the high frequency portion of local telephone lines with competitors so that competitors could offer DSL services on a national basis. The Court of Appeals overturned the FCCs unbundling and line sharing rules. Specifically, the Court found that the FCC failed to properly apply the statutory necessary and impair requirement in deciding which UNEs needed to be unbundled and did not consider the costs of overly expansive unbundling requirements and the relevance of competition for broadband services from cable and, to a lesser extent, satellite offerings. While the FCC continues its triennial review of incumbent unbundling and line sharing obligations in light of this ruling and current marketplace conditions, which the FCC expects to complete by the end of the year, we have voluntarily committed to maintain our affected line sharing offerings at least until February 15, 2003. During this period, we have indicated a willingness to work with our wholesale customers to develop mutually acceptable market-based offerings and prices related to line sharing. These actions are intended to provide certainty to our wholesale line sharing customers while preserving our rights.
Texas Rate ReclassificationIn June 2002, the Texas Supreme Court ruled that a 1999 Texas Public Utility Commission (TPUC) order allows our Texas wireline subsidiary to reclassify 32 telephone exchanges (including Dallas, Fort Worth and Austin) to a higher rate group, effectively increasing customers monthly charges as access lines grow in those exchanges. We expect the TPUC to approve the reclassifications, possibly during the fourth quarter of 2002, with an estimated annual revenue increase of approximately $20. We also are entitled to recover the fees retroactively from the date of the TPUCs original 1999 order (estimated at a minimum of $110, including interest, at June 30, 2002) Based on the present value of this gross amount, discounted for collectibility, we recorded revenue of $47 during the second quarter. Our method of recovery is subject to approval by the TPUC.
California Long-Distance In July 2002, a California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) Administrative Law Judge issued a proposed decision conditionally approving our California wireline subsidiarys application to enter the long-distance market in California. The CPUC is expected to consider a final ruling on this draft decision by the end of August 2002. Upon approval by the CPUC we will then file for approval from the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) before providing long-distance service in California. The FCC must issue its decision within 90 days of our filing. At least until we receive long-distance relief, our competitive local service losses will continue at an increasing rate because of the abnormally low UNE-P rates in California.
California DSL SettlementIn settlement of a complaint and CPUC investigation regarding the billing practices of our California wireline subsidiary and advance services affiliates, in July 2002, our subsidiaries agreed to pay the state of California approximately $27 (fully accrued at June 30, 2002), improve billing practices and compensate customers for future billing errors. The agreement is pending CPUC approval, which is expected during the third quarter of 2002.
Ohio Service Quality Resolution In July 2002, the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (PUCO) concluded its investigation of our Ohio wireline subsidiary, restoring the subsidiarys ability to pay dividends to the parent company without prior PUCO approval.
OTHER BUSINESS MATTERS
New Accounting StandardsStatement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations, is effective January 1, 2003. The standard requires companies with legal obligations associated with the retirement of long-lived assets to recognize the fair value of the liability for these asset retirement obligations in the period in which the obligations are incurred and capitalize that amount as a part of the book value of the long-lived asset. We are currently evaluating the standard but do not expect it to have a material effect on our results of operations or financial position.
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 145, Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections is effective January 1, 2003. Among other things, this statement rescinds FASB Statement No. 4, Reporting Gains and Losses from Extinguishment of Debt which required all gains and losses from extinguishment of debt to be aggregated and, if material, classified as an extraordinary item, net of related income tax effect. We do not expect the standard to have a material effect on our results of operations or financial position.
Disposition See Note 2 for a discussion of our disposition of a portion of our interest in Bell Canada.
WorldCom Bankruptcy On July 21, 2002, WorldCom filed a petition for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. Our receivables from WorldCom as of the bankruptcy filing were approximately $325. At June 30, 2002, we had reserves of approximately $200 related to that filing. We plan to ask the federal bankruptcy court to utilize existing contract provisions to offset the amounts we have collected from WorldComs long-distance customers, in our role as a billing agent for WorldCom, against unpaid pre-bankruptcy charges WorldCom owes us. Additionally, we plan to ask the bankruptcy court to approve offset of other amounts we owe WorldCom for pre-bankruptcy periods against unpaid pre-bankruptcy charges. We will also seek assurance of payment of post-bankruptcy charges from the court, which we estimate at approximately $150 per month. We have not reserved for an adverse court decision. WorldComs bankruptcy proceeding is currently in its initial stages and the effect on our financial position or results of operations cannot be determined at this time.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
We had $543 in cash and cash equivalents available at June 30, 2002. During the first six months of 2002 and 2001 our primary source of funds continued to be cash provided by operating activities. As of June 30, 2002, we had entered into agreements with several banks for committed lines of credit totaling $3,700, all of which may be used to support commercial paper borrowings. We had no borrowings outstanding under these lines of credit as of June 30, 2002. Subsequently, we replaced these with new lines of credit which total $3,805 as of August 12, 2002. Drawdowns on these committed lines of credit must be repaid within one year and are conditioned on there being no material adverse change in our business, operations or financial condition.
Our commercial paper borrowings decreased $1,042 during the first six months of 2002, and at June 30, 2002, totaled $4,997, of which $4,710 was due within 90 days and $287 was due thereafter. In the first quarter of 2002 SBC International initiated a commercial paper borrowing program in order to simplify intercompany borrowing arrangements. Our total commercial paper borrowings include borrowings under this program of $2,949 at June 30, 2002. This is consistent with our current focus on replacing short-term debt with long-term debt.
Our investing activities during the first six months of 2002 consisted of $3,496 in construction and capital expenditures, primarily in the wireline segment. Investing activities during the first six months of 2002 also include proceeds of $93 relating to the sale of Amdocs shares and $197 related to the sale of Telmex and América Móvil L shares. Cash paid for asset acquisitions in 2002 include approximately $300 for our first-quarter 2002 Yahoo! investment and $106 in payments to América Móvil for our purchase of a 50% non-controlling interest in Cellular Communications of Puerto Rico. We currently expect our capital spending for 2002 to be less than $8,000, excluding Cingular, reflecting a previously announced reduction in order to reduce expenses in response to the U.S. economic decline and our lower revenue expectations.
In June 2002, we entered into an agreement to redeem a portion of our ownership in Bell Canada, representing approximately 4% of the company, for an $873 short-term note, resulting in a pre-tax gain of approximately $148. Under the terms of the agreement, on July 15, 2002 when we received the proceeds from the short-term note, we purchased approximately 9 million shares of BCE, the majority shareholder of Bell Canada, for approximately $164. We have also entered into an agreement that gives us the right to sell to BCE our remaining interest in Bell Canada, representing approximately 16% of the company, for a one-month period beginning on January 3, 2003. The same agreement also gives BCE the right to purchase our remaining interest for a one-month period beginning October 15, 2002. BCE has indicated that it is likely to exercise its right.
The agreement specifies a price of 4,990 Canadian Dollars (CAD) ($3,285 at June 30, 2002 exchange rates) to be paid by BCE with 1,548 CAD in cash and the remainder in a combination of cash, notes and BCE stock. The market price of BCE shares on June 30, 2002 was 26.39 CAD per share.
Upon the sale of our remaining interest in Bell Canada, BCE has the right to redeem notes held by us, at face value, for 314 CAD ($207 at June 30, 2002 exchange rates), plus accrued interest. Otherwise, the notes will mature on December 31, 2004. Our carrying value of the notes at June 30, 2002 was approximately $180.
Short-term borrowings with original maturities of three months or less increased $337 in the first six months of 2002 due to increased borrowing of shorter term commercial paper under our commercial paper borrowing program. However, total commercial paper decreased approximately $1,042 during the six month period. We also spent $1,223 in the first six months of 2002 on the repurchase of shares of our common stock under the repurchase plans announced in January 2000 and in November 2001. As of June 30, 2002, we had repurchased a total of approximately 131 million shares of our common stock of the 200 million shares authorized to be repurchased. Cash paid for dividends in the first six months of 2002 was $1,762, or 2.0% higher than in the first six months of 2001, due to an increase in dividends declared per share in 2002.
During the first quarter of 2002, we reclassified $1,000 of 20-year annual Puttable Reset Securities (PURS) from debt maturing within one year to long-term debt. The notes bear interest at approximately 4.30% annually until June 2003, at which time an investment bank has an option to require us to remarket or redeem the notes. If the option is exercised, the investment bank will reset the interest rate and remarket the notes for another 12-month term. If the bank does not exercise its option on that reset date, we will be required to redeem the notes at par. The company supports this long-term classification based on its intent and ability to refinance the PURS on a long-term basis under available lines of credit.
We also redeemed, prior to maturity, approximately $55 of debt obligations during June 2002. In February 2002, we issued approximately $1,000 of 10-year, 5.875%, global notes. Proceeds from this debt issuance were used for general corporate purposes. In March 2002, we issued approximately $1,000 of variable rate, one-year notes. The interest rate is based on the London Interbank Offer Rate (LIBOR). Proceeds from this debt issuance were used to refinance debt.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
There has been no material change in the disclosures about our sensitivities to market risks related to financial instruments since December 31, 2001.
CAUTIONARY LANGUAGE CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Information set forth in this report contains forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties. We claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements provided by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
The following factors could cause our future results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements:
Readers are cautioned that other factors discussed in this report, although not enumerated here, also could materially impact our future earnings.
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 2. Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds
During the second quarter of 2002, non-employee directors acquired from the Company shares of common stock pursuant to the Companys Non-Employee Director Stock and Deferral Plan. Under the plan, a director may make an annual election to receive all or part of his or her annual retainer or fees in the form of SBC shares or deferred stock units (DSUs) that are convertible into SBC shares. Each Director also receives an annual grant of DSUs. During this period, an aggregate of 65,511 SBC shares and DSUs were acquired by non-employee directors at prices ranging from $30.15 to $36.66, in each case the fair market value of the shares on the date of acquisition. The issuances of shares and DSUs were exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
Annual Meeting of Shareowners
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.