COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 0-50189
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No __
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). Yes X No __
There were 166,121,922 shares of Common Stock outstanding as of April 30, 2005.
Crown Holdings, Inc.
FORM 10-QFOR QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2005
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
CONDENSED COMBINING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
For the three months ended March 31, 2005(in millions)
13
For the three months ended March 31, 2004(in millions)
14
CONDENSED COMBINING BALANCE SHEET
As of March 31, 2005(in millions)
15
As of December 31, 2004(in millions)
16
CONDENSED COMBINING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Introduction
The following discussion presents managements analysis of the results of operations for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 compared to the corresponding period in 2004 and the changes in financial condition and liquidity from December 31, 2004. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 along with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included in and referred to within this report.
Executive Overview
The Companys principal areas of focus include improving segment income, reducing debt and reducing asbestosrelated costs. Segment income is defined by the Company as net sales less cost of products sold, depreciation and amortization, selling and administrative expenses and provision for restructuring.
Improving segment income is primarily dependent on the Companys ability to increase revenues and manage costs. Key strategies for building and expanding the business include targeting geographic markets with strong growth potential, such as Asia, Latin America and southern and central Europe, improving selling prices in certain product lines and developing innovative packaging products using proprietary technology. The Companys cost control efforts focus on improving operating efficiencies and managing material and labor costs, including pension and benefit costs. The Company operates globally and has significant revenues, income, cash flow and debt denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar.
The reduction of debt remains a principal strategic goal of the Company and is primarily dependent upon the Companys ability to generate cash flow from operations. In addition, the Company may consider divestitures from time to time. The Companys total debt of $4,023 at March 31, 2005 decreased $19 from $4,042 at March 31, 2004, and included an increase of $65 for that period due to currency exchange rates.
The Company seeks to reduce its asbestosrelated costs through prudent case management. Asbestosrelated payments were $41 in 2004 and $2 for the first quarter of 2005, and the Company expects to pay approximately $40 for the full year of 2005.
Results of Operations
Net Sales
Net sales in the first quarter of 2005 were $1,703, an increase of $80 or 4.9% compared to net sales of $1,623 for the same period in 2004. Sales from U.S. operations accounted for 28.7% of consolidated net sales in the first quarter of 2005 compared to 29.4% for the same period in 2004. Sales of beverage cans and ends accounted for 36.5% and sales of food cans and ends accounted for 30.2% of consolidated net sales in the first quarter of 2005 compared to 35.6% and 31.6%, respectively, in 2004.
An analysis of comparative segment net sales follows:
25
Net sales in the Americas segment for the first quarter of 2005 were $669, an increase of $29 or 4.5% compared to net sales of $640 in the first quarter of 2004. The increase in net sales for the first quarter of 2005 was primarily due to the passthrough of raw material costs to customers and currency translation of $10. The effect of currency translation was primarily due to the strengthening of the Canadian dollar against the U.S. dollar.
Net sales in the European segment for the first quarter of 2005 were $929, an increase of $30 or 3.3% compared to net sales of $899 in the first quarter of 2004. The increase in net sales for the first quarter of 2005 was primarily due to the favorable impact of currency translation from the strengthening of the euro and pound sterling against the U.S. dollar.
Net sales in the AsiaPacific segment for the first quarter of 2005 were $105, an increase of $21 or 25.0% compared to net sales of $84 in the first quarter of 2004. The increase in net sales for the first quarter of 2005 was primarily due to increased beverage can volumes in China.
Cost of Products Sold (Excluding Depreciation and Amortization)
Cost of products sold, excluding depreciation and amortization, was $1,424 for the first quarter of 2005, an increase of $63 compared to $1,361 for the same period in 2004. The increases were primarily due to the impact of currency translation of approximately $39 for the quarter and higher material costs for aluminum and steel.
As a percentage of net sales, cost of products sold, excluding depreciation and amortization, was 83.6% for the first quarter of 2005 compared to 83.9% for the same period in 2004.
As a result of steel price increases, the Company in 2005 has implemented significant price increases in all of its steel product categories. To date, the impact on the Companys earnings has not been material as a result of the passthrough of increased costs to customers. However, there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to fully recover from its customers the impact of steel surcharges or price increases. In addition, if the Company is unable to purchase steel for a significant period of time, the Companys steel-consuming operations would be disrupted. The Company is continuing to monitor this situation and the effect on its operations.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization was $72 in the first quarter of 2005, decreases of $5 and 6.5% from the prior year period. The decreases were primarily due to lower capital spending in recent years, offset by increases of $2 due to currency translation for the first quarter of 2005. The effect of currency translation was primarily due to the strengthening of the euro and pound sterling against the U.S. dollar.
Selling and Administrative Expense
Selling and administrative expense was $96 in the first quarter of 2005 compared to $92 for the same period in 2004. The increase was primarily due to increased compensation costs and $1 of currency translation in Europe from the strengthening of the euro and pound sterling against the U.S. dollar. As a percentage of net sales, selling and administrative expense was 5.6% for the first quarter of 2005 compared to 5.7% for the same period in 2004.
Segment Income
Note M to the consolidated financial statements provides a reconciliation of consolidated segment income (net sales less cost of products sold, depreciation and amortization, selling and administrative expense and provision for restructuring) to consolidated loss before income taxes, minority interests and equity earnings.
Consolidated segment income was $111 in the first quarter of 2005 compared to $93 in the first quarter of 2004. As a percentage of consolidated net sales, segment income was 6.5% in the first quarter of 2005 compared to 5.7% for the same period in 2004.
26
An analysis of segment income follows:
Americas segment income, as a percentage of net sales, was 6.3% in the first quarter of 2005 compared to 4.2% for the same period in 2004. The increases in segment income and percentage margin in 2005 were primarily due to cost reduction efforts.
European segment income, as a percentage of net sales, was 8.6% in the first quarter of 2005 compared to 8.9% for the same period in 2004. Increases of $3 due to foreign currency translation and $2 due to lower depreciation were offset by lower overall volumes.
Asia-Pacific segment income was $14 in the first quarter of 2005 compared to $12 for the same period in 2004. The increase in segment income was primarily due to increased beverage can volumes in China.
Loss From Early Extinguishments of Debt
During the first quarter of 2004, the Company recognized a loss of $4 before tax, primarily in Europe, in connection with the repurchase of certain unsecured notes
Interest Expense
Interest expense increased $4 for the first quarter of 2005 versus the same period in 2004 primarily due to increased borrowing rates on the Companys floating rate debt compared to 2004.
Translation and Exchange Adjustments
The results for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 included net foreign exchange losses of $30 compared to net losses of $4 for the same period in 2004. These losses primarily arose from unhedged foreign currency exposures created when the majority of U.S. dollar debt from the Companys 2003 refinancing was issued by its European subsidiaries. These currency exposures may continue to result in future foreign exchange gains or losses. The Company may hedge a portion of these exposures in the future through derivative instruments or intercompany loans. Further discussion of the potential impact on earnings from the 2003 refinancing is provided in Item 3, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk of this Quarterly Report on Form 10Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005.
Taxes on Income
The first quarter of 2005 included net tax charges of $0 on pre-tax losses of $6. The difference of $2 between the pre-tax loss at the U.S. statutory rate of 35% or a benefit of $2, and the tax charge of $0 was primarily due to (i) charges of $7 for valuation allowance adjustments, primarily due to U.S. losses, and $2 for withholding taxes, offset by (ii) benefits from lower non-U.S. tax rates in certain jurisdictions.
27
The first quarter of 2004 included a tax charge of $8 on a pre-tax loss of $3. The difference of $9 between the pre-tax loss at the U.S. statutory rate of 35%, or a benefit of $1, and the tax charge of $8 was primarily due to charges of $12 for valuation allowance adjustments where tax benefits were not recorded on pre-tax losses.
Minority Interests, Net of Equity Earnings
The charge for minority interests, net of equity earnings, decreased $1 in the first quarter of 2005 compared to the same period of 2004. The decrease for the first quarter of 2005 was primarily due to increased equity earnings in the beverage can joint ventures in the Middle East.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash from Operations
Cash of $281 was used by operating activities in the first quarter of 2005 compared to $197 used by operations during the same period in 2004. The increase of $84 in cash used by operating activities was primarily due to an increase of $100 in cash used for working capital. The increase in working capital was primarily due to increased raw material prices in 2005.
Investing Activities
Investing activities used cash of $41 during the first quarter of 2005 compared to cash used of $47 in the prior year period. Primary investing activities were capital expenditures of $36 and $38 in 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Financing Activities
Financing activities provided cash of $198 during the first quarter of 2005 compared to cash provided of $86 during the same period in 2004. The increase in cash from financing activities compared to 2004 was used to fund the increased working capital in 2005 compared to 2004.
During the first quarter of 2005, the Company repurchased approximately 500,000 shares of its common stock for $8.
Refinancings
On February 26, 2003, the Company completed a refinancing consisting of the sale of $1,085 of 9.5% second priority senior secured notes due 2011, 285 of 10.25% second priority senior secured notes due in 2011, $725 of 10.875% third priority senior secured notes due in 2013, $504 of first priority term loans due in 2008 and a $550 first priority revolving credit facility due in 2006. Proceeds were used to repay the Companys previous credit facility, repurchase and repay a portion of the Companys outstanding unsecured notes and pay fees and expenses associated with the refinancing.
In September 2004, the Company completed an additional refinancing consisting of the sale of 350 of 6.25% first priority senior secured notes due 2011 and a new $625 senior secured credit facility. The new facility included a $400 revolving credit facility, a $100 standby letter of credit facility due in 2010 and a $125 term loan facility due in 2011. In October 2004, the Company completed an addon issuance of 110 of 6.25% first priority senior secured notes due 2011, bringing the total of the two issuances to 460. The 350 of proceeds from the first issuance combined with the new $625 senior secured credit facility was used to refinance the existing credit and term loan facilities entered into in February, 2003, and to pay fees and expenses associated with the refinancing. The 110 of proceeds from the second issuance was used to repay the $125 term loan from September 2004 and to pay expenses associated with the issuance.
As of March 31, 2005, the Company had $260 of borrowing capacity available under its revolving credit facility, equal to the total facility of $400 less $140 of borrowings. The Company also has $27 of standby letters of credit capacity equal to $100 less $73 of standby letters of credit outstanding.
28
In April 2005, the Company repurchased $35 aggregate principal of its 7.0% senior notes due 2006 at a premium of 3.0% to principal, and will recognize a loss of $1 from the early extinguishments of debt during the second quarter of 2005.
Further information relating to the Companys liquidity and capital resources is set forth under Note Fto the consolidated financial statements, which information is incorporated herein by reference.
Contractual Obligations
Purchase obligations, covering new agreements for raw materials and energy, increased by $96 in 2005 and $48 in 2006 above the amounts provided within Part I, Item 7, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, including, but not limited to, in the Liquidity and Capital Resources section of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.
Commitments and Contingent Liabilities
Information regarding the Companys commitments and contingent liabilities appear in Part I within Item 1 of this report under Note J, entitled Commitments and Contingent Liabilities, to the consolidated financial statements, which information is incorporated herein by reference.
Critical Accounting Policies
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States which require that management make numerous estimates and assumptions. Actual results could differ from these estimates and assumptions, impacting the reported results of operations and financial condition of the Company. Managements Discussion and Analysis and Note A to the consolidated financial statements contained in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 describe the significant accounting estimates and policies used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements. There have been no significant changes in the Companys critical accounting policies during the first three months of 2005.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2004, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123 (revised 2004) (FAS 123(R)), ShareBased Payment. FAS 123(R) replaces SFAS No. 123 (FAS 123), Accounting for StockBased Compensation and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. FAS 123(R) requires that the cost of sharebased payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, be recognized in the financial statements based on their grantdate fair values. The pro forma disclosures previously permitted under FAS 123 will no longer be an alternative to financial statement recognition. Under FAS 123(R), the Company must select an appropriate valuation model to calculate the fair value of its sharebased payments for awards made subsequent to adoption of the standard, and a transition method for recognizing compensation expense. Valuations of awards granted prior to adoption of the standard have been and will be calculated using the BlackScholes Option Pricing model. Upon adoption of the standard, these prior valuations will not be reassessed. The transition methods provided in the standard include modified prospective and retrospective options. Under the modified prospective method, compensation expense for all unvested stock awards, measured by the grantdate fair value of the awards, will be charged to earnings prospectively over the remaining vesting period, based on the estimated number of awards that are expected to vest. Under the retrospective method, prior reporting periods back to the date of issuance of FAS 123 may be restated. The restatement of prior periods under the retrospective method will be based on the amounts previously recognized in the pro forma disclosures required by the original provisions of FAS 123. The Company is currently evaluating the requirements of FAS 123(R) and intends to adopt the new standard on January 1, 2006, the amended effective date set for public companies by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
29
In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151 (FAS 151), Inventory Costs An Amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4. FAS 151 amends the guidance in ARB No. 43 to clarify that abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs and material spoilage should be expensed as incurred and not included in overhead. Additionally, FAS 151 requires that the allocation of fixed production overheads to the costs of conversion should be based on normal capacity of the production facilities. FAS 151 is effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. As required, the Company will prospectively adopt the standard at the beginning of 2006. The Company is currently evaluating the effect that the adoption of FAS 151 will have, but does not expect that it will have a material impact on its consolidated results of operations and financial condition.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153 (FAS 153), Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets An Amendment of APB Opinion No. 29. FAS 153 eliminates the exception from fair value measurement for nonmonetary exchanges of similar productive assets in paragraph 21(b) of APB 29 and replaces it with an exception for exchanges that do not have commercial substance. FAS 153 specifies that a nonmonetary exchange has commercial substance if the future cash flows of the entity are expected to change significantly as a result of the exchange. The provisions of FAS 153 are effective for nonmonetary asset exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company will prospectively adopt the new standard in 2006.
Forward Looking Statements
Statements included herein in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, including, but not limited to, in the Cost of Products Sold section and in the discussions of asbestos in Note I, commitments and contingencies in Note J and pension and other postretirement benefits in Note L to the consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10Q and also in Part I, Item 1: Business and Item 3: Legal Proceedings and in Part II, Item 7: Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, within the Companys Annual Report on Form 10K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, which are not historical facts (including any statements concerning plans and objectives of management for future operations or economic performance, or assumptions related thereto), are forwardlooking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. In addition, the Company and its representatives may from time to time, make oral or written statements which are also forwardlooking statements.
These forwardlooking statements are made based upon managements expectations and beliefs concerning future events impacting the Company and, therefore, involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Management cautions that forwardlooking statements are not guarantees and that actual results could differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forwardlooking statements.
While the Company periodically reassesses material trends and uncertainties affecting the Companys results of operations and financial condition in connection with the preparation of Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and certain other sections contained in the Companys quarterly, annual or other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Company does not intend to review or revise any particular forwardlooking statement in light of future events.
A discussion of important factors that could cause the actual results of operations or financial condition of the Company to differ from expectations has been set forth in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10K for the year ended December 31, 2004 within Part II, Item 7: Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations under the caption Forward Looking Statements and is incorporated herein by reference. Some of the factors are also discussed elsewhere in this Form 10Q and in prior Company filings with the SEC. In addition, other factors have been or may be discussed from time to time in the Companys SEC filings.
30
Following its refinancing in 2003, the Company has significant U.S. dollar exposure in Europe which may result in future material foreign exchange adjustments to earnings. As of March 31, 2005, the Company had approximately $1.3 billion of net U.S. dollardenominated liability exposure in its European subsidiaries, including approximately $0.9 billion in subsidiaries with the euro as their functional currency and approximately $0.4 billion in subsidiaries with the pound sterling as their functional currency. In addition, a euro functional currency subsidiary had a Canadian dollar asset exposure of approximately $0.5 billion from an intercompany loan. Based on the exposures at March 31, 2005, a one percentage change in the functional currencies against the exposure would result in an exchange gain or loss of approximately $8 million before tax.
As of March 31, 2005, the Company had approximately $0.8 billion principal floating interest rate debt, including $0.5 billion from outstanding interest rate swaps as discussed inNote G to the consolidated financial statements, which information is incorporated herein by reference. A change of .25% in these floating interest rates would change annual interest expense by approximately $2 million before tax.
As of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10Q, management, including the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon that evaluation, and as of the end of the quarter for which this report is made, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective, in all material respects, to ensure that information to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files and submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported as and when required.
There has been no change in internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended March 31, 2005, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
31
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
32
33
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Date: May 4, 2005
34