Darden Restaurants
DRI
#972
Rank
$25.15 B
Marketcap
$216.27
Share price
1.27%
Change (1 day)
9.44%
Change (1 year)
Darden Restaurants, Inc. is a an American restaurant chain company that operates chains such as Red Lobster, Olive Garden and Bahama Breeze.

Darden Restaurants - 10-Q quarterly report FY


Text size:
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

------------

FORM 10-Q

------------

(Mark One)
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended November 27,
2005

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ............... to ..................

1-13666
Commission File Number

---------------------------------

DARDEN RESTAURANTS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Florida 59-3305930
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
incorporation or organization)

5900 Lake Ellenor Drive,
Orlando, Florida 32809
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

407-245-4000
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Not Applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year,
if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days.
[X] Yes [ ] No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as
defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
[X] Yes [ ] No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as
defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
[ ] Yes [X] No

Number of shares of common stock outstanding as of December 27, 2005:
151,168,712 (excluding 122,336,429 shares held in our treasury).


- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DARDEN RESTAURANTS, INC.


TABLE OF CONTENTS



Page

Part I - Financial Information

Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited) 3

Consolidated Statements of Earnings 3

Consolidated Balance Sheets 4

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders'
Equity and Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
(Loss) 5

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows 6

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 7

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations 13

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About
Market Risk 22

Item 4. Controls and Procedures 22

Part II - Other Information

Item 1. Legal Proceedings 23

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and
Use of Proceeds 24

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders 25

Item 5. Other Information 25

Item 6. Exhibits 25

Signatures 26

Index to Exhibits 27


2
PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DARDEN RESTAURANTS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
(In thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)


Quarter Ended Six Months Ended
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
November 27, November 28, November 27, November 28,
2005 2004 2005 2004
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Sales.................................................. $1,325,093 $1,229,373 $2,734,260 $2,508,017
Costs and expenses:
Cost of sales:
Food and beverage................................. 389,575 368,036 808,770 759,457
Restaurant labor.................................. 440,956 400,714 890,115 806,530
Restaurant expenses............................... 215,081 202,287 429,775 397,304
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------
Total cost of sales, excluding restaurant
depreciation and amortization of $50,600,
$49,486, $101,020 and $98,705, respectively... $1,045,612 $ 971,037 $2,128,660 $1,963,291
Selling, general and administrative................. 132,181 130,785 265,216 245,365
Depreciation and amortization....................... 54,761 53,176 108,899 105,936
Interest, net....................................... 11,670 11,007 22,618 21,971
---------- ----------- ---------- ----------
Total costs and expenses........................ $1,244,224 $1,166,005 $2,525,393 $2,336,563
---------- ----------- ---------- ----------

Earnings before income taxes........................... 80,869 63,368 208,867 171,454
Income taxes........................................... (25,812) (20,393) (68,296) (57,467)
---------- ----------- ---------- ----------

Net earnings........................................... $ 55,057 $ 42,975 $ 140,571 $ 113,987
========== =========== ========== ==========

Net earnings per share:
Basic.............................................. $ 0.37 $ 0.27 $ 0.93 $ 0.73
========== =========== ========== ==========
Diluted............................................ $ 0.35 $ 0.26 $ 0.89 $ 0.70
========== =========== =========== ==========

Average number of common shares outstanding:
Basic.............................................. 149,600 156,800 151,400 157,200
========== =========== ========== ===========
Diluted............................................ 156,200 163,400 158,300 163,400
========== =========== ========== ===========


- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.




3
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

DARDEN RESTAURANTS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)



- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
November 27, 2005 May 29, 2005
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents................................. $ 72,536 $ 42,801
Short-term investments.................................... 10,000 --
Receivables............................................... 38,066 36,510
Inventories............................................... 247,353 235,444
Prepaid expenses and other current assets................. 31,723 28,927
Deferred income taxes..................................... 63,613 63,584
------------ ------------
Total current assets.................................. $ 463,291 $ 407,266
Land, buildings and equipment, net........................... 2,404,948 2,351,454
Other assets................................................. 187,270 179,051
------------ ------------

Total assets.......................................... $ 3,055,509 $ 2,937,771
============ ============

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable.......................................... $ 209,767 $ 191,197
Accrued payroll........................................... 102,637 114,602
Accrued income taxes...................................... 43,993 52,404
Other accrued taxes....................................... 41,558 43,825
Unearned revenues......................................... 81,086 88,472
Current portion of long-term debt......................... 149,988 299,929
Other current liabilities................................. 259,522 254,178
------------ ------------
Total current liabilities............................. $ 888,551 $ 1,044,607
Long-term debt, less current portion......................... 645,830 350,318
Deferred income taxes........................................ 103,821 114,846
Deferred rent................................................ 134,841 130,872
Other liabilities............................................ 27,676 24,109
------------ ------------
Total liabilities..................................... $ 1,800,719 $ 1,664,752
------------ ------------

Stockholders' equity:
Common stock and surplus.................................. $ 1,758,851 $ 1,703,336
Retained earnings......................................... 1,516,471 1,405,754
Treasury stock............................................ (1,968,849) (1,784,835)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)............. (1,911) (8,876)
Unearned compensation..................................... (49,283) (41,685)
Officer notes receivable.................................. (489) (675)
------------ ------------
Total stockholders' equity............................ $ 1,254,790 $ 1,273,019
------------ ------------

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity............ $ 3,055,509 $ 2,937,771
============ ============

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

4
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

DARDEN RESTAURANTS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY AND
ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
For the six months ended November 27, 2005 and November 28, 2004
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Common Accumulated
Stock Other Officer Total
and Retained Treasury Comprehensive Unearned Notes Stockholders'
Surplus Earnings Stock Income (Loss) Compensation Receivable Equity
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance at May 29, 2005.......... $1,703,336 $1,405,754 $(1,784,835) $ (8,876) $(41,685) $ (675) $1,273,019
Comprehensive income:
Net earnings.................. -- 140,571 -- -- -- -- 140,571
Other comprehensive income
(loss):
Foreign currency
adjustment................. -- -- -- 2,163 -- -- 2,163
Change in fair value of
derivatives, net of tax
of $2,646.................. -- -- -- 4,802 -- -- 4,802
------------
Total comprehensive
income................. 147,536
Cash dividends declared.......... -- (29,854) -- -- -- -- (29,854)
Stock option exercises (1,888
shares)........................ 25,644 -- 3,472 -- -- -- 29,116

Issuance of restricted stock
(403 shares), net of forfeiture
adjustments.................... 12,735 -- -- -- (12,735) -- --
Earned compensation.............. -- -- -- -- 2,962 -- 2,962
ESOP note receivable repayments.. -- -- -- -- 2,175 -- 2,175
Income tax benefits credited to
equity......................... 13,788 -- -- -- -- -- 13,788
Purchases of common stock for
treasury(5,839 shares)........... -- -- (188,270) -- -- -- (188,270)
Issuance of treasury stock under
Employee Stock Purchase and
other plans (122 shares)....... 3,348 -- 784 -- -- -- 4,132
Repayment of officer notes....... -- -- -- -- -- 186 186
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance at November 27, 2005 $1,758,851 $1,516,471 $(1,968,849) $ (1,911) $(49,283) $ (489) $1,254,790
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Common Accumulated
Stock Other Officer Total
and Retained Treasury Comprehensive Unearned Notes Stockholders'
Surplus Earnings Stock Income (Loss) Compensation Receivable Equity
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Balance at May 30, 2004.......... $1,584,115 $1,127,653 $(1,483,768) $ (10,173) $(41,401) $ (1,138) $1,175,288
Comprehensive income:
Net earnings.................. -- 113,987 -- -- -- -- 113,987
Other comprehensive income
(loss):
Foreign currency
adjustment................ -- -- -- 3,344 -- -- 3,344
Change in fair value of
derivatives, net of
tax of $1,308............. -- -- -- (650) -- -- (650)
-----------
Total comprehensive
income................ 116,681
Cash dividends declared.......... -- (6,251) -- -- -- -- (6,251)
Stock option exercises (2,667
shares)........................ 24,357 -- 3,599 -- -- -- 27,956
Issuance of restricted stock
(360 shares), net of forfeiture
adjustments.................... 8,281 -- -- -- (8,281) -- --
Earned compensation.............. -- -- -- -- 3,411 -- 3,411
ESOP note receivable repayments.. -- -- -- -- 990 -- 990
Income tax benefits credited to
equity......................... 13,704 -- -- -- -- -- 13,704
Purchases of common stock for
treasury(3,179 shares)......... -- -- (68,743) -- -- -- (68,743)
Issuance of treasury stock under
Employee Stock Purchase and
other plans (163 shares)....... 2,176 -- 1,153 -- -- -- 3,329
Repayment of officer notes, net.. -- -- -- -- -- 354 354
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance at November 28, 2004 $1,632,633 $1,235,389 $(1,547,759) $ (7,479) $(45,281) $ (784) $1,266,719
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

5
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

DARDEN RESTAURANTS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)

Quarter Ended Six Months Ended
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
November 27, November 28, November 27, November 28,
2005 2004 2005 2004
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Cash flows--operating activities
Net earnings................................................. $ 55,057 $ 42,975 $ 140,571 $ 113,987
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to cash flows:
Depreciation and amortization.............................. 54,761 53,176 108,899 105,936
Asset impairment charge (credit), net...................... 1,305 (108) 1,369 (113)
Amortization of unearned compensation and loan costs....... 2,524 2,648 4,746 5,199
Non-cash compensation expense.............................. 1,086 945 1,220 973
Change in current assets and liabilities................... (78,125) 9,931 (23,171) (4,959)
Contributions to defined benefit pension plans and
postretirement plan...................................... (68) (45) (194) (151)
Loss on disposal of land, buildings and equipment.......... 939 153 1,561 307
Change in cash surrender value of trust owned life
insurance................................................ (2,234) (3,485) (3,410) (3,214)
Deferred income taxes...................................... (3,920) (6,503) (13,700) (10,229)
Change in deferred rent.................................... 1,714 2,461 3,969 4,522
Change in other liabilities ............................... 2,790 2,009 3,761 2,561
Income tax benefits credited to equity..................... 4,496 9,177 13,788 13,704
Other, net................................................. 1,726 556 7,693 (1,776)
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Net cash provided by operating activities................ $ 42,051 $ 113,890 $ 247,102 $ 226,747
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------

Cash flows--investing activities
Sales (purchases) of short term investments.................. 90,000 -- (10,000) --
Purchases of land, buildings and equipment................... (85,071) (84,117) (166,172) (146,782)
Proceeds from disposal of land, buildings and equipment ..... 6,254 4,020 6,254 5,204
Increase in other assets..................................... (3,446) (1,931) (6,022) (2,250)
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities...... $ 7,737 $ (82,028) $(175,940) $(143,828)
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Cash flows--financing activities
Proceeds from issuance of common stock....................... 13,013 20,797 32,028 30,312
Dividends paid............................................... (29,854) (6,251) (29,854) (6,251)
Purchases of treasury stock.................................. (55,132) (6,780) (188,270) (68,743)
Decrease in short-term debt.................................. -- (17,800) -- (14,500)
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt..................... -- -- 294,669 --
ESOP note receivable repayment............................... 1,187 240 2,175 990
Repayment of long-term debt.................................. (151,187) (240) (152,175) (990)
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Net cash used in financing activities.................... $(221,973) $ (10,034) $ (41,427) $(59,182)
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------

(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents................ (172,185) 21,828 29,735 23,737
Cash and cash equivalents - beginning of period................. 244,721 38,603 42,801 36,694
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------

Cash and cash equivalents - end of period....................... $ 72,536 $ 60,431 $ 72,536 $ 60,431
========== ========== ========== ==========

Cash flow from changes in current assets and liabilities
Receivables.................................................. 2,003 (5,383) (1,556) (647)
Inventories.................................................. (21,636) (18,452) (11,909) (37,660)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets.................... 3,283 5,049 (3,787) 2,562
Accounts payable............................................. (19,224) (2,899) 18,570 (12,825)
Accrued payroll.............................................. 3,332 3,173 (11,965) (10,727)
Accrued income taxes......................................... (46,779) 13,407 (8,411) 42,742
Other accrued taxes.......................................... (5,567) (4,190) (2,267) (2,357)
Unearned revenues............................................ 4,525 6,063 (7,386) (4,359)
Other current liabilities.................................... 1,938 13,163 5,540 18,312
---------- ---------- ----------- ----------
Change in current assets and liabilities................. $ (78,125) $ 9,931 $ (23,171) $ (4,959)
========== ========== =========== ==========
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

6
DARDEN RESTAURANTS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

Note 1. Background

Darden Restaurants, Inc. ("we, "our" or the "Company") owns and operates
casual dining restaurants in the United States and Canada under the trade names
Red Lobster(R), Olive Garden(R), Bahama Breeze(R), Smokey Bones Barbeque &
Grill(R) and Seasons 52(R). We have prepared these consolidated financial
statements pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "SEC"). They do not include certain information and footnotes
required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America for complete financial statements. However, in the opinion of
management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation have
been included and are of a normal recurring nature. Operating results for the
quarter and six months ended November 27, 2005 are not necessarily indicative of
the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending May 28, 2006.

These statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated
financial statements and related notes to consolidated financial statements
included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 29,
2005. The accounting policies used in preparing these consolidated financial
statements are the same as those described in our Form 10-K. The preparation of
financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Note 2. Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

During the quarter and six months ended November 27, 2005, we paid $10,798
and $18,415, respectively, for interest (net of amounts capitalized) and $71,888
and $75,957, respectively, for income taxes. Interest income of $1,332 and
$2,484 associated with our cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments
was recognized in earnings as a component of interest, net, during the quarter
and six months ended November 27, 2005. During the quarter and six months ended
November 28, 2004, we paid $12,584 and $20,022, respectively, for interest (net
of amounts capitalized) and $3,657 and $10,357, respectively, for income taxes.
Interest income of $328 and $537 associated with our cash and cash equivalents
was recognized in earnings as a component of interest, net, during the quarter
and six months ended November 28, 2004.

Note 3. Stock-Based Compensation

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 123, "Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation," encourages the use of a fair-value method of
accounting for stock-based awards under which the fair value of stock options is
determined on the date of grant and expensed over the vesting period. As allowed
by SFAS No. 123, we have elected to account for our stock-based compensation
plans under an intrinsic value method that requires compensation expense to be
recorded only if, on the date of grant, the current market price of our common
stock exceeds the exercise price the employee must pay for the stock. Our policy
is to grant stock options at the fair market value of our underlying stock at
the date of grant. Accordingly, no compensation expense has been recognized for
stock options granted under any of our stock plans because the exercise price of
all options granted was equal to the current market value of our stock on the
grant date. Had we determined compensation expense for

7
our stock options based on the fair value at the grant date as prescribed  under
SFAS No. 123, our net earnings and net earnings per share would have been
reduced to the pro forma amounts indicated below:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Quarter Ended Six Months Ended
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
November 27, November 28, November 27, November 28,
2005 2004 2005 2004
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net earnings, as reported $ 55,057 $ 42,975 $ 140,571 $ 113,987
Add: Stock-based compensation expense
included in reported net earnings, net
of related tax effects 1,676 1,569 2,552 2,629
Deduct: Total stock-based compensation
expense determined under fair value based
method for all awards, net of related tax
effects (5,018) (5,584) (10,424) (10,612)
----------------------------------------------------------------
$ 51,715 $ 38,960 $ 132,699 $ 106,004
================================================================
Basic net earnings per share
As reported $ 0.37 $ 0.27 $ 0.93 $ 0.73
Pro forma $ 0.35 $ 0.25 $ 0.88 $ 0.67
Diluted net earnings per share
As reported $ 0.35 $ 0.26 $ 0.89 $ 0.70
Pro forma $ 0.33 $ 0.24 $ 0.84 $ 0.65
=================================================================================================================
</TABLE>

Note 4. Short-Term Investments

Short-term investments consist of investment grade auction rate securities,
which have been classified as available-for-sale and reported at fair value.
Interest rates for our investments in auction rate securities are reset through
an auction process at predetermined periods ranging from 28 to 35 days. Despite
the long-term nature of their stated contractual maturities, there is a readily
liquid market for these securities and failed auctions rarely occur. Due to the
reset feature and their carrying value equaling their fair value, there are no
gross realized and unrealized gains or losses from these short-term investments.
As of November 27, 2005 and May 29, 2005, we held approximately $10,000 and $0,
respectively, in short-term investments.

Note 5. Long-Term Debt

On July 29, 2005, we filed a registration statement with the SEC to
register an additional $475,000 of debt securities using a shelf registration
process as well as to carry forward the $125,000 of debt securities available
under our prior registration statement. Under this registration statement, which
became effective on August 5, 2005, we may offer, from time to time, up to
$600,000 of our debt securities. On August 12, 2005, we issued $150,000 of
unsecured 4.875 percent senior notes due in August 2010 and $150,000 of
unsecured 6.000 percent senior notes due in August 2035 under the registration
statement. Discount and issuance costs, which were $2,430 and $2,901,
respectively, are being amortized over the terms of the senior notes using the
effective interest rate method. A portion of the proceeds from these issuances
was used to repay at maturity our outstanding $150,000 of 8.375 percent senior
notes on September 15, 2005. We intend to use the remaining proceeds from the
issuance to repay at maturity our outstanding $150,000 of 6.375 percent notes
due February 1, 2006.

We also maintain a credit facility, dated August 16, 2005, with a
consortium of banks under which we can borrow up to $500,000. As part of this
credit facility, we may request issuance of up to $100,000 in letters of credit.
The credit facility allows us to borrow at interest rates that vary based on a
spread over (i) LIBOR or (ii) a base rate that is the higher of the prime rate
or one-half of one percent above the federal funds rate, at our option. The
interest rate spread over LIBOR is determined by our debt rating. We may also
request that loans be made at interest rates offered by one or more of the
banks, which may vary from the LIBOR or base rate. The credit facility supports
our commercial paper borrowing program and expires on August 15, 2010. We are
required to pay a facility fee of 10.0 basis points per annum on the average
daily amount of loan commitments by the consortium. The amount of interest and
annual facility fee are subject to change based on our maintenance of certain
debt ratings and financial ratios, such as maximum debt to capital ratios.
Advances under the credit facility are unsecured. As of November 27, 2005 and
May 29, 2005, no borrowings were outstanding.

8
Note 6.  Net Earnings per Share

Outstanding stock options and restricted stock granted by us represent the
only dilutive effect reflected in diluted weighted average shares outstanding.
Options and restricted stock do not impact the numerator of the diluted net
earnings per share computation.

Options to purchase 1,953,883 and 2,674,182 shares of common stock were
excluded from the calculation of diluted net earnings per share for the quarters
ended November 27, 2005 and November 28, 2004, respectively, because their
exercise prices exceeded the average market price of common shares for the
period. Options to purchase 1,941,383 and 3,539,251 shares of common stock were
excluded from the calculation of diluted net earnings per share for the six
months ended November 27, 2005 and November 28, 2004, respectively, for the same
reason.

Note 7. Stockholders' Equity

Pursuant to the authorization of our Board of Directors to repurchase up to
137,400,000 shares in accordance with applicable securities regulations, we
repurchased 1,785,181 and 5,839,255 shares of our common stock for $55,132 and
$188,270 during the quarter and six months ended November 27, 2005,
respectively, resulting in a cumulative repurchase of 126,424,126 shares as of
November 27, 2005.

Note 8. Food and Beverage Costs

Food and beverage costs include inventory, warehousing and related
purchasing and distribution costs. Vendor allowances received in connection with
the purchase of a vendor's products are recognized as a reduction of the related
food and beverage costs as earned. Advance payments are made by the vendors
based on estimates of volume to be purchased from the vendors and the terms of
the agreement. As we make purchases from the vendors each period, we recognize
the pro rata portion of allowances earned as a reduction of food and beverage
costs for that period. Differences between estimated and actual purchases are
settled in accordance with the terms of the agreements. Vendor agreements are
generally for a period of one year or more and payments received are initially
recorded as long-term liabilities. Amounts which are expected to be earned
within one year are recorded as a current liability.

Note 9. Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

During the first quarter of fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005, we entered into
equity forward contracts to hedge the risk of changes in future cash flows
associated with the unvested unrecognized Darden stock units granted during the
first quarter of fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005. The equity forward contracts will
be settled at the end of the vesting periods of their underlying Darden stock
units, which range between four and five years. The equity forward contracts,
which are indexed to 330,000 shares of our common stock, have an $8,264 notional
amount and can only be net settled in cash. The equity forward contracts are
used to hedge the variability in cash flows associated with the unvested
unrecognized Darden stock units. To the extent the equity forward contracts are
effective in offsetting the variability of the hedged cash flows, changes in the
fair value of the equity forward contracts are not included in current earnings
but are reported as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). A deferred
gain of $2,693 related to the equity forward contracts was recognized in
accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) at November 27, 2005. As the
Darden stock units vest, we will effectively de-designate that portion of the
equity forward contract that no longer qualifies for hedge accounting, and
changes in fair value associated with that portion of the equity forward
contract will be recognized in current earnings. A gain of $420 and $102 was
recognized in earnings as a component of restaurant labor during the quarters
ended November 27, 2005 and November 28, 2004, respectively. A gain of $511 and
$116 was recognized in earnings as a component of restaurant labor during the
six months ended November 27, 2005 and November 28, 2004, respectively.


9
During  fiscal 2005 and fiscal  2004,  we entered into  interest  rate swap
agreements ("swaps") to hedge the risk of changes in interest rates on the cost
of a future issuance of fixed-rate debt. The swaps, which had a $100,000
notional principal amount of indebtedness, were used to hedge a portion of the
interest payments associated with $150,000 of unsecured 4.875 percent senior
notes due in August 2010, which were issued in August 2005. The interest rate
swaps were settled at the time of the related debt issuance with a net loss of
$1,177 being recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). The
net loss on the interest rate swaps is being amortized into earnings as an
adjustment to interest expense over the same period in which the related
interest costs on the new debt issuance are being recognized in earnings. A loss
of $59 was recognized in earnings during the quarter ended November 27, 2005 as
an adjustment to interest expense.

Note 10. Retirement Plans

Components of net periodic benefit cost are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Defined Benefit Plans Postretirement Benefit Plan
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quarter Ended Quarter Ended
November November 28, November 27, November 28,
27, 2005 2004 2005 2004
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Service cost $ 1,321 $ 1,217 $ 159 $ 176
Interest cost 2,016 1,829 233 251
Expected return on plan assets (3,264) (3,210) -- --
Amortization of unrecognized prior service cost 21 (87) -- --
Recognized net actuarial loss 1,374 1,248 49 86
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net periodic benefit cost $ 1,468 $ 997 $ 441 $ 513
=======================================================================================================================

Defined Benefit Plans Postretirement Benefit Plan
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Six Months Ended Six Months Ended
November November 28, November 27, November 28,
27, 2005 2004 2005 2004
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Service cost $ 2,621 $ 2,434 $ 340 $ 350
Interest cost 4,032 3,657 466 502
Expected return on plan assets (6,534) (6,420) -- --
Amortization of unrecognized prior service cost 42 (174) -- --
Recognized net actuarial loss 2,748 2,496 98 173
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net periodic benefit cost $ 2,909 $ 1,993 $ 904 $ 1,025
=======================================================================================================================
</TABLE>

Note 11. Commitments and Contingencies

As collateral for performance on other contracts and as credit guarantees
to banks and insurers, we are contingently liable pursuant to guarantees of
subsidiary obligations under standby letters of credit. As of November 27, 2005,
and May 29, 2005, we had $64,556 and $72,677, respectively, of standby letters
of credit related to workers' compensation and general liabilities accrued in
our consolidated financial statements. As of November 27, 2005 and May 29, 2005,
we also had $14,377 and $13,829, respectively, of standby letters of credit
related to contractual operating lease obligations and other payments. All
standby letters of credit are renewable annually.

As of November 27, 2005 and May 29, 2005, we had $1,519 and $1,768,
respectively, of guarantees associated with properties that have been assigned
to third parties. These amounts represent the maximum potential amount of future
payments under the guarantees. The fair value of these potential payments,
discounted at our pre-tax cost of capital, at November 27, 2005 and May 29, 2005
amounted to $1,212 and $1,395, respectively. We have not accrued for the
guarantees, as we believe the likelihood of the third parties defaulting on the
assignment agreements is improbable. In the event of default by a third party,
the indemnity and default clauses in our assignment agreements govern our
ability to pursue and recover from the third party for damages incurred as a
result of its default. We do not hold any third-party assets as collateral
related to these assignment agreements, except to the extent the assignment
allows us to repossess the building and personal property. The guarantees expire
over their respective lease terms, which range from fiscal 2007 through fiscal
2012.


10
We are subject to private lawsuits,  administrative  proceedings and claims
that arise in the ordinary course of our business. A number of these lawsuits,
proceedings and claims may exist at any given time. These matters typically
involve claims from guests, employees and others related to operational issues
common to the restaurant industry and can also involve infringement of, or
challenges to, our trademarks. While the resolution of a lawsuit, proceeding or
claim may have an impact on our financial results for the period in which it is
resolved, we believe that the final disposition of the lawsuits, proceedings and
claims in which we are currently involved, either individually or in the
aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position,
results of operations or liquidity.

Like other restaurant companies and retail employers, we have been faced in
a few states with allegations of purported class-wide wage and hour violations.
The following is a brief description of the more significant of these matters.
In view of the inherent uncertainties of litigation, the outcome of any
unresolved matter described below cannot be predicted at this time, nor can the
amount of any potential loss be reasonably estimated.

In March 2003 and March 2002, two purported class action lawsuits were
brought against us in the Superior Court of Orange County, California by three
current and former hourly restaurant employees alleging violations of California
labor laws with respect to providing meal and rest breaks. Although we continue
to believe we provided the required meal and rest breaks to our employees, to
avoid potentially costly and protracted litigation, we agreed during the second
quarter of fiscal 2005 to settle both lawsuits and a similar case filed in
Sacramento County for approximately $9,500. Terms of the settlement, which do
not include any admission of liability by us, have received preliminary judicial
approval, and claims administration is underway. During the quarter ended
November 27, 2005, we paid $3,720 towards the settlement of these claims. The
remaining $5,780 was paid in December 2005 and is included in other current
liabilities at November 27, 2005.

In August 2003, three former employees in Washington filed a similar
purported class action in Washington State Superior Court in Spokane County
alleging violations of Washington labor laws with respect to providing rest
breaks. The Court stayed the action and ordered the plaintiffs into our
mandatory arbitration program. The plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration was
not granted; their appeal of the denial of reconsideration was also not granted,
and plaintiffs subsequently filed a demand for arbitration. We believe we
provided the required meal and rest breaks to our employees, and we intend to
vigorously defend our position in this case.

Beginning in 2002, a total of five purported class action lawsuits were
filed in Superior Courts of California (two each in Los Angeles County and
Orange County, and one in Sacramento County) in which the plaintiffs allege that
they and other current and former service managers, beverage and hospitality
managers and culinary managers were improperly classified as exempt employees
under California labor laws. The plaintiffs seek unpaid overtime wages and
penalties. Two of the cases have been removed to arbitration under our mandatory
arbitration program, one has been stayed to allow consideration of judicial
coordination with the other cases, one is proceeding as an individual claim, and
one remains a purported class action litigation matter. We believe we properly
classified these employees as exempt under California law, and we intend to
vigorously defend against all claims in these lawsuits.

Note 12. Future Application of Accounting Standards

In November 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued
SFAS No. 151, "Inventory Costs," which clarifies the accounting for abnormal
amounts of idle facilities expense, freight, handling costs and wasted material.
SFAS No. 151 is effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years
beginning after June 15, 2005. We do not believe the adoption of SFAS No. 151
will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, "Exchanges of Non-Monetary
Assets." SFAS No. 153 eliminates the exception for non-monetary exchanges of
similar productive assets and replaces it with a general exception for exchanges
of non-monetary assets that do not have commercial substance. SFAS No. 153 is
effective for non-monetary asset exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning
after June 15, 2005. We do not believe the adoption of SFAS No. 153 will have a
material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

11
In December  2004,  the FASB issued  SFAS No. 123  (Revised),  "Share-Based
Payment." SFAS No. 123R revises SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation" and generally requires the cost associated with employee services
received in exchange for an award of equity instruments to be measured based on
the grant-date fair value of the award and recognized in the financial
statements over the period during which employees are required to provide
service in exchange for the award. SFAS No. 123R also provides guidance on how
to determine the grant-date fair value for awards of equity instruments as well
as alternative methods of adopting its requirements. SFAS No. 123R is effective
for annual reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2005. As disclosed in Note
3, based on the current assumptions and calculations used, had we recognized
compensation expense based on the fair value of awards of equity instruments,
net earnings would have been reduced by approximately $3,342 and $7,872 for the
quarter and six months ended November 27, 2005, respectively, and $4,015 and
$7,983 for the quarter and six months ended November 28, 2004, respectively. We
have not yet determined the method of adoption or the effect of adopting SFAS
No. 123R and have not determined whether the adoption will result in future
amounts similar to the current pro forma disclosures under SFAS No. 123.

In June 2005, the FASB's Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") reached a
consensus on Issue No. 05-6, "Determining the Amortization Period for Leasehold
Improvements" ("EITF 05-6"). EITF 05-6 requires that leasehold improvements
acquired in a business combination or purchased subsequent to the inception of a
lease be amortized over the lesser of the useful life of the assets or a term
that includes renewals that are reasonably assured at the date of the business
combination or purchase. The guidance is effective for periods beginning after
June 29, 2005. The adoption of EITF 05-6 did not have a material impact on our
consolidated financial statements.

In October 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Staff
Position No. 13-1, "Accounting for Rental Costs Incurred During a Construction
Period" ("FSP No. 13-1"). FSP No. 13-1 is effective for the first reporting
period beginning after December 15, 2005 and requires that rental costs
associated with ground or building operating leases that are incurred during a
construction period be recognized as rental expense. Adoption of FSP No. 13-1
will not have a material impact on our financial statements as our existing
accounting policies are in compliance with FSP No. 13-1.


12
Item 2. Management's  Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations

The discussion and analysis below for the Company should be read in
conjunction with the financial statements and the notes to such financial
statements included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q. The following table sets forth
selected operating data as a percent of sales for the periods indicated. All
information is derived from the consolidated statements of earnings for the
quarters and six months ended November 27, 2005 and November 28, 2004.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Quarter Ended Six Months Ended
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
November 27, November 28, November 27, November 28,
2005 2004 2005 2004
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Sales .................................................... 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Costs and expenses:
Cost of sales:
Food and beverage.................................... 29.4 29.9 29.6 30.3
Restaurant labor..................................... 33.3 32.6 32.6 32.2
Restaurant expenses.................................. 16.2 16.5 15.7 15.8
----- ------ ------ -----
Total cost of sales, excluding restaurant
depreciation and amortization of 3.8%,
4.0%, 3.7% and 3.9%, respectively............... 78.9% 79.0% 77.9% 78.3%
Selling, general and administrative.................... 10.0 10.6 9.7 9.8
Depreciation and amortization.......................... 4.1 4.3 4.0 4.2
Interest, net.......................................... 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.9
----- ------ ------ -----
Total costs and expenses......................... 93.9% 94.8% 92.4% 93.2%
----- ------ ------ -----

Earnings before income taxes.............................. 6.1 5.2 7.6 6.8
Income taxes.............................................. (1.9) (1.7) (2.5) (2.3)
----- ------ ------ -----

Net earnings.............................................. 4.2% 3.5% 5.1% 4.5%
===== ====== ====== =====

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>

OVERVIEW OF OPERATIONS

Our sales were $1.33 billion and $2.73 billion for the second quarter and
first six months of fiscal 2006 compared to $1.23 billion and $2.51 billion for
the second quarter and first six months of fiscal 2005. The 7.8 percent and 9.0
percent increases in sales for the second quarter and first six months of fiscal
2006, respectively, were driven primarily by increased U.S. same-restaurant
sales at Olive Garden and Red Lobster and a net increase of 55 company-owned
restaurants since the second quarter of fiscal 2005. For the second quarter of
fiscal 2006, our net earnings were $55 million compared to $43 million for the
second quarter of fiscal 2005, a 28.1 percent increase, and our diluted net
earnings per share were $0.35 for the second quarter of fiscal 2006 compared to
$0.26 for the second quarter of fiscal 2005, a 34.6 percent increase. For the
first six months of fiscal 2006, our net earnings were $141 million compared to
$114 million for the first six months of fiscal 2005, a 23.3 percent increase,
and our diluted net earnings per share were $0.89 for the first six months of
fiscal 2006 compared to $0.70 for the first six months of fiscal 2005, a 27.1
percent increase.

Olive Garden reported its 45th consecutive quarter of U.S. same-restaurant
sales growth during the second quarter of fiscal 2006 with a 6.4 percent
increase. Olive Garden continues to focus on providing an excellent guest
experience, and laying the foundation for accelerated new restaurant growth. Red
Lobster's U.S. same-restaurant sales for the second quarter of fiscal 2006
increased for the fifth consecutive quarter with a 2.7 percent increase. During
the second quarter of fiscal 2006, Red Lobster continued to focus on its "Simply
Great" operating discipline, which has helped improve its consistency of
execution while also reducing unnecessary costs. As a result, Red Lobster has
improved its guest satisfaction results to record levels and increased
same-restaurant sales. Bahama Breeze's same-restaurant sales increased 1.9
percent in the second quarter of fiscal 2006 while it continues to focus on
improving the guest experience and introducing several new approachable but
distinctive dishes. Smokey Bones same-restaurant sales decreased 8.5 percent in
the second quarter of fiscal 2006. Smokey Bones operated 34 more

13
restaurants  than the prior year's  second  quarter,  including  seven that were
opened during the second quarter of fiscal 2006. Smokey Bones continues to focus
on broadening its appeal through menu enhancements and increasing guest
frequency while lowering its cost of sales. In addition, recent softening of
sales at Smokey Bones has lead us to reevaluate our new restaurant opening
strategy. We expect to focus future openings in the geographic areas where
Smokey Bones has demonstrated business strength in order to ensure an
appropriate return on capital. We also expect to slow the pace of new restaurant
openings for Smokey Bones from 25 to 30 in fiscal 2006 to approximately 10 to 15
new restaurants in fiscal 2007.

Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, which occurred in the second quarter of fiscal
2006, had a minimal direct effect on our fiscal second quarter 2006 sales and
net earnings. There are currently two restaurants (one Olive Garden and one Red
Lobster) that are closed indefinitely, and one Red Lobster that is closed
temporarily, as a result of Hurricane Katrina. Decisions regarding rebuilding
and reopening are pending clean-up and recovery efforts in Louisiana and
Mississippi.

SALES

Sales were $1.33 billion and $1.23 billion for the quarters ended November
27, 2005 and November 28, 2004, respectively. The 7.8 percent increase in sales
for the second quarter of fiscal 2006 was primarily due to increased U.S.
same-restaurant sales at Olive Garden and Red Lobster and a net increase of 55
company-owned restaurants since the second quarter of fiscal 2005. Red Lobster
sales of $589 million were 3.4 percent above last year's second quarter, which
resulted primarily from a 2.7 percent increase in U.S. same-restaurant sales.
The increase in U.S. same-restaurant sales resulted primarily from a 1.4 percent
increase in same-restaurant guest counts and a 1.3 percent increase in average
check. Olive Garden's sales of $618 million were 9.6 percent above last year's
second quarter, driven primarily by a 6.4 percent increase in U.S.
same-restaurant sales and its 21 net new restaurants in operation since the
second quarter of last year. Olive Garden achieved its 45th consecutive quarter
of U.S. same-restaurant sales growth primarily as a result of a 4.7 percent
increase in same-restaurant guest counts and a 1.7 percent increase in average
check. Bahama Breeze sales of $36 million were 1.9 percent above last year's
second quarter, primarily as a result of higher same-restaurant guest counts.
Smokey Bones sales of $77 million were 31 percent above last year's second
quarter primarily as a result of its 34 net new restaurants in operation since
the second quarter of last year. Same restaurant sales decreased 8.5 percent
compared the second quarter of last year.

Sales were $2.73 billion and $2.51 billion for the six months ended
November 27, 2005 and November 28, 2004, respectively. The 9.0 percent increase
in sales for the first six months of fiscal 2006 was primarily due to increased
U.S. same-restaurant sales at Olive Garden and Red Lobster and a net increase of
55 company-owned restaurants since the second quarter of fiscal 2005. Red
Lobster sales of $1.22 billion were 5.1 percent above last year, which resulted
primarily from a 4.2 percent increase in U.S. same-restaurant sales. The
increase in U.S. same-restaurant sales resulted primarily from a 2.2 percent
increase in same-restaurant guest counts and a 2.0 percent increase in average
check. Olive Garden's sales of $1.26 billion were 10.2 percent above last year,
driven primarily by a 7.0 percent increase in U.S. same-restaurant sales and its
21 net new restaurants in operation since the second quarter of last year. The
increase in U.S. same-restaurant sales resulted primarily from a 4.9 percent
increase in same-restaurant guest counts and a 2.1 percent increase in average
check. Bahama Breeze sales of $82 million were 0.4 percent above last year.
Smokey Bones sales of $159 million were 38.5 percent above last year primarily
as a result of its 34 net new restaurants in operation since the second quarter
of last year.

COSTS AND EXPENSES

Total costs and expenses were $1.24 billion and $1.17 billion for the
quarters ended November 27, 2005 and November 28, 2004, respectively. As a
percent of sales, total costs and expenses decreased from 94.8 percent in the
second quarter of fiscal 2005 to 93.9 percent in the second quarter of fiscal
2006.

Food and beverage costs increased $22 million, or 5.9 percent, from $368
million to $390 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2006 compared to the
second quarter of fiscal 2005. As a percent of sales, food and beverage costs
decreased in the second quarter of fiscal 2006 primarily as a result of lower
seafood costs and cost savings initiatives. Food and beverage costs, as a
percent of sales, also decreased as a result of the larger contribution by Olive
Garden, which has historically had lower food and beverage costs, to our overall
sales and operating results. Restaurant labor increased $40 million, or 10
percent, from $401 million to $441 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2006
compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2005. As a percent of sales, restaurant
labor increased in the second quarter of fiscal 2006 primarily as a result of an
increase in wage rates and benefit costs and

14
higher restaurant-level  bonuses, which were partially offset by increased sales
leverage at Olive Garden and Red Lobster. Restaurant labor, as a percent of
sales, also increased as a result of the larger contribution by Olive Garden,
which has historically had higher restaurant labor costs, to our overall sales
and operating results. Restaurant expenses (which include lease, property tax,
credit card, utility, workers' compensation, insurance, new restaurant
pre-opening and other restaurant-level operating expenses) increased $13
million, or 6.3 percent, from $202 million to $215 million in the second quarter
of fiscal 2006 compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2005. As a percent of
sales, restaurant expenses decreased in the second quarter of fiscal 2006
primarily as a result of increased sales leverage at Olive Garden and Red
Lobster and lower workers' compensation and general liability expenses, which
were partially offset by higher utility and pre-opening expenses at Olive Garden
and Red Lobster. The decrease in our workers' compensation and general liability
expenses resulted primarily from safety initiatives which have continued to
provide reductions in the frequency rate of claims.

Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $1 million, or 1.1
percent, from $131 million to $132 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2006
compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2005. As a percent of sales, selling,
general and administrative expenses decreased in the second quarter of fiscal
2006 primarily as a result of increased sales leverage at Olive Garden and Red
Lobster.

Depreciation and amortization expense increased $2 million, or 3.0 percent,
from $53 million to $55 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2006 compared to
the second quarter of fiscal 2005. As a percent of sales, depreciation and
amortization expense decreased in the second quarter of fiscal 2006 primarily as
a result of increased sales leverage at Olive Garden and Red Lobster, which was
partially offset by new restaurant activity.

Net interest expense in the second quarter of fiscal 2006 was comparable to
the second quarter of fiscal 2005. Although interest expense increased as a
result of the issuance of additional long-term debt in August 2005, this
increase was offset by the interest income associated with the investment of
proceeds from the issuance of the long-term debt.

Total costs and expenses were $2.53 billion and $2.34 billion for the
six months ended November 27, 2005 and November 28, 2004, respectively. As a
percent of sales, total costs and expenses decreased from 93.2 percent for the
first six months of fiscal 2005 to 92.4 percent for the first six months of
fiscal 2006.

Food and beverage costs increased $49 million, or 6.5 percent, from $759
million to $809 million in the first six months of fiscal 2006 compared to the
first six months of fiscal 2005. As a percent of sales, food and beverage costs
decreased in the first six months of fiscal 2006 primarily as a result of cost
savings initiatives. Food and beverage costs, as a percent of sales, also
decreased as a result of the larger contribution by Olive Garden, which has
historically had lower food and beverage costs, to our overall sales and
operating results. Restaurant labor increased $84 million, or 10.4 percent, from
$807 million to $890 million in the first six months of fiscal 2006 compared to
the first six months of fiscal 2005. As a percent of sales, restaurant labor
increased in the first six months of fiscal 2006 primarily as a result of an
increase in wage rates and higher restaurant-level bonuses, which was partially
offset by increased sales leverage at Olive Garden and Red Lobster. Restaurant
labor, as a percent of sales, also increased as a result of the larger
contribution by Olive Garden, which has historically had higher restaurant labor
costs, to our overall sales and operating results. Restaurant expenses increased
$32 million, or 8.2 percent, from $397 million to $430 million in the first six
months of fiscal 2006 compared to the first six months of fiscal 2005. As a
percent of sales, restaurant expenses decreased in the first six months of
fiscal 2006 primarily as a result of increased sales leverage at Olive Garden
and Red Lobster and lower workers' compensation and general liability expenses,
which were partially offset by higher utility and pre-opening expenses at Olive
Garden and Red Lobster.

Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $20 million, or 8.1
percent, from $245 million to $265 million in the first six months of fiscal
2006 compared to the first six months of fiscal 2005. As a percent of sales,
selling, general and administrative expenses decreased in the first six months
of fiscal 2006 primarily as a result of increased sales leverage at Olive Garden
and Red Lobster.

Depreciation and amortization expense increased $3 million, or 2.8 percent,
from $106 million to $109 million in the first six months of fiscal 2006
compared to the first six months of fiscal 2005. As a percent of sales,
depreciation and amortization expense decreased in the first six months of
fiscal 2006 primarily as a result of increased sales leverage at Olive Garden
and Red Lobster, which was partially offset by new restaurant activity.

15
Net interest expense increased $1 million, or 2.9 percent, from $22 million
to $23 million in the first six months of fiscal 2006 compared to the first six
months of fiscal 2005. As a percent of sales, net interest expense decreased in
the first six months of fiscal 2006 primarily as a result increased sales
leverage at Olive Garden and Red Lobster.

INCOME TAXES

The effective income tax rate for the second quarter and first six months
of fiscal 2006 was 31.9 percent and 32.7 percent, respectively, compared to an
effective income tax rate of 32.2 percent and 33.5 in the second quarter and
first six months of fiscal 2005, respectively. The rate decrease in fiscal 2006
was primarily due to an increase in FICA tax credits for employee reported tips
that we expect to receive for fiscal 2006.

NET EARNINGS AND NET EARNINGS PER SHARE

For the second quarter of fiscal 2006, our net earnings were $55 million
compared to $43 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2005, a 28.1 percent
increase, and our diluted net earnings per share were $0.35 compared to $0.26 in
the second quarter of fiscal 2005, a 34.6 percent increase. At Red Lobster,
increased sales and lower food and beverage costs, restaurant expenses, selling,
general and administrative expenses and depreciation expenses as a percent of
sales more than offset higher restaurant labor costs as a percent of sales. As a
result, Red Lobster had a strong double-digit operating profit increase in the
second quarter of fiscal 2006 compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2005. At
Olive Garden, increased sales and lower food and beverage costs, selling,
general and administrative expenses and depreciation expenses as a percent of
sales more than offset increased restaurant labor costs and restaurant expenses
as a percent of sales, resulting in record second quarter operating profit for
Olive Garden in fiscal 2006 and a double-digit operating profit increase over
the same period in fiscal 2005. The increase in both our net earnings and
diluted net earnings per share for the second quarter of fiscal 2006 was
primarily due to increased U.S. same-restaurant sales at Olive Garden and Red
Lobster, new restaurant growth and decreases in our consolidated food and
beverage costs, restaurant expenses, selling, general and administrative
expenses and depreciation expenses as a percent of sales, which more than offset
increased restaurant labor expenses as a percent of sales.

For the first six months of fiscal 2006, our net earnings were $141 million
compared to $114 million for the first six months of fiscal 2005, a 23.3 percent
increase, and our diluted net earnings per share were $0.89 compared to $0.70 in
the first six months of fiscal 2005, a 27.1 percent increase. At Red Lobster,
increased sales and lower food and beverage costs, restaurant expenses, selling,
general and administrative expenses and depreciation expenses as a percent of
sales more than offset higher restaurant labor expenses as a percent of sales.
As a result, Red Lobster had a strong double-digit operating profit increase in
the first six months of fiscal 2006 compared to the first six months of fiscal
2005. At Olive Garden, increased sales and lower food and beverage costs,
restaurant expenses and depreciation expenses as a percent of sales more than
offset increased restaurant labor costs, and selling, general and administrative
expenses as a percent of sales, resulting in a double-digit operating profit
increase over the first six months of fiscal 2005. The increase in both our net
earnings and diluted net earnings per share for the first six months of fiscal
2006 was primarily due to increased U.S. same-restaurant sales at Olive Garden
and Red Lobster, new restaurant growth and decreases in our consolidated food
and beverage costs, restaurant expenses, selling, general and administrative
expenses and depreciation expenses as a percent of sales, which more than offset
increased restaurant labor expenses as a percent of sales.

SEASONALITY

Our sales volumes fluctuate seasonally. During fiscal 2005, our sales were
highest in the spring and winter, followed by the summer, and lowest in the
fall. During fiscal 2004 and 2003, our sales were highest in the spring, lowest
in the fall, and comparable during winter and summer. Holidays, severe weather
and similar conditions may impact sales volumes seasonally in some operating
regions. Because of the seasonality of our business, results for any quarter are
not necessarily indicative of the results that may be achieved for the full
fiscal year.

16
NUMBER OF RESTAURANTS

The following table details the number of restaurants open at the end of
the second quarter of fiscal 2006, compared with the number open at the end of
fiscal 2005 and the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2005.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
November 27, 2005 May 29, 2005 November 28, 2004
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

<S> <C> <C> <C>
Red Lobster - USA.................. 647 648 649
Red Lobster - Canada............... 31 31 31
------ ------ ------
Total......................... 678 679 680
------ ------ ------

Olive Garden - USA................. 562 557 541
Olive Garden - Canada.............. 6 6 6
------- ------ ------
Total......................... 568 563 547
------- ------ ------

Bahama Breeze...................... 32 32 32
Smokey Bones ...................... 117 104 83
Seasons 52......................... 3 3 1
------- ------ ------
Total......................... 1,398 1,381 1,343
======= ====== ======

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Cash flows generated from operating activities provide us with a
significant source of liquidity, which we use to finance the purchases of land,
buildings and equipment, to pay dividends and to repurchase shares of our common
stock. Since substantially all of our sales are for cash and cash equivalents
and accounts payable are generally due in five to 30 days, we are able to carry
current liabilities in excess of current assets. In addition to cash flows from
operations, we use a combination of long-term and short-term borrowings to fund
our capital needs.

Our commercial paper program serves as our primary source of short-term
financing. As of November 27, 2005, no commercial paper was outstanding under
the program. To support our commercial paper program, we have a credit facility
under a Credit Agreement dated August 16, 2005, with a consortium of banks,
under which we can borrow up to $500 million. As part of this credit facility,
we may request issuance of up to $100 million in letters of credit. The
borrowings and letters of credit obtained under the Credit Agreement may be
denominated in U.S. dollars or other currencies approved by the banks. The
Credit Agreement allows us to borrow at interest rates that vary based on a
spread over (i) LIBOR or (ii) a base rate that is the higher of the prime rate
or one-half of one percent above the federal funds rate, at our option. The
interest rate spread over LIBOR is determined by our debt rating. We may also
request that loans be made at interest rates offered by one or more of the
banks, which may vary from the LIBOR or base rate. The credit facility expires
on August 15, 2010, and contains various restrictive covenants, including a
leverage test that requires us to maintain a ratio of consolidated total debt to
consolidated total capitalization of less than 0.65 to 1.00 and a limitation on
secured debt and debt owed by subsidiaries, subject to certain exceptions, of 10
percent of our consolidated tangible net worth. The credit facility does not,
however, contain a prohibition on borrowing in the event of a ratings downgrade
or a Material Adverse Effect, as defined in the Credit Agreement. None of these
covenants is expected to limit our liquidity or capital resources. As of
November 27, 2005, we were in compliance with all covenants under the Credit
Agreement.

At November 27, 2005, our long-term debt consisted principally of: (1) $150
million of unsecured 5.75 percent medium-term notes due in March 2007, (2) $75
million of unsecured 7.45 percent medium-term notes due in April 2011, (3) $100
million of unsecured 7.125 percent debentures due in February 2016, (4) $150
million of unsecured 4.875 percent senior notes due in August 2010, (5) $150
million of unsecured 6.000 percent senior notes due in August 2035 and (6) an
unsecured, variable rate $24 million commercial bank loan due in December 2018
that is used to support two loans from us to the Employee Stock Ownership Plan
portion of the Darden Savings Plan. We also have $150 million of unsecured 6.375
percent notes due in February 2006 included in current liabilities at November
27, 2005. In September 2005, we used a portion of the proceeds from our issuance
of the 4.875 percent and 6.000 percent senior notes, which were issued in August
2005, to repay $150 million of unsecured 8.375 percent senior notes at maturity.
We intend to use the remaining proceeds from the senior notes issued in August
2005 to repay at maturity the $150 million of unsecured 6.375 percent notes due
February 1, 2006. The proceeds from the issuance of the senior notes in August
2005 and the repayment of the $150 million of senior notes in September 2005

17
are included in net cash flows used in financing  activities for the quarter and
six months ended November 27, 2005. Through a shelf registration on file with
the SEC, we may issue up to an additional $300 million of unsecured debt
securities from time to time. The debt securities may bear interest at either
fixed or floating rates and will have such other terms as determined at the time
of any issuance.

Our Board of Directors has authorized us to repurchase up to an aggregate
of 137.4 million shares of our common stock. Net cash flows used in financing
activities included our repurchase of 1.8 million shares of our common stock for
$55 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2006, compared to 0.3 million shares
for $7 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2005. For the first six months of
fiscal 2006, net cash flows used by financing activities included our repurchase
of 5.8 million shares of our common stock for $188 million compared to 3.2
million shares for $69 million for the first six months of 2005. As of November
27, 2005, we have repurchased a total of 126.4 million shares of our common
stock. The repurchased common stock is reflected as a reduction of stockholders'
equity.

Net cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities included
capital expenditures incurred principally for building new restaurants,
replacing equipment and remodeling existing restaurants. Capital expenditures
were $85 million and $166 million in the second quarter and first six months of
fiscal 2006, respectively, compared to $84 million and $147 million in the
second quarter and first six months of fiscal 2005, respectively. The increased
expenditures in the second quarter and first six months of fiscal 2006 resulted
primarily from increased spending associated with building new restaurants.

Net cash flows used in financing activities included $30 million in
dividends paid in the second quarter and first six months of fiscal 2006,
compared to $6 million for the same periods in fiscal 2005. On September 22,
2005, the Board of Directors declared an increase in the cash dividend to twenty
cents per share to be paid on November 1, 2005 to all shareholders of record as
of the close of business on October 10, 2005. Based on this twenty cent
semi-annual dividend declaration, our indicated annual dividend is forty cents
per share. Previously, we had paid a semi-annual dividend of four cents per
share.

Net cash flows provided by operating activities included $72 million and
$76 million in income taxes paid in the second quarter and first six months of
fiscal 2006, compared to $4 million and $10 million for the same periods in
fiscal 2005. The increase in tax payments in fiscal 2006 resulted primarily from
accelerated deductions allowable for depreciation of certain capital
expenditures during the first six months of fiscal 2005, which lowered our
income tax payments in those periods. These accelerated deductions were not
available for fiscal 2006 expenditures. The increase in tax payments in the
first six months of fiscal 2006 compared to the first six months of fiscal 2005
is also due to the tax payment extension provided by the Internal Revenue
Service ("IRS") in the second quarter of fiscal 2005. This extension was
provided to all Florida taxpayers in the disaster area counties struck by
tropical storm Bonnie and hurricanes Charley and Frances in August and September
2005. Tax payments due in the second quarter of fiscal 2005 were remitted to the
IRS in the third quarter of fiscal 2005.

A table of our contractual obligations and other commercial commitments as
of May 29, 2005 was included in Item 7, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations" of our Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended May 29, 2005. During the quarter ended August 28,
2005, the issuance of our unsecured senior notes in August 2005 increased the
amount of payments due in respect of long-term debt. During the quarter ended
November 27, 2005, the repayment of unsecured senior notes at maturity in
September 2005 decreased the amount of payments due in respect of long-term
debt. At November 27, 2005, the amount of payments due in respect of long-term
debt in the less than one year period was $195.7 million, in the 1-3 year period
was $221.1 million, in the 3-5 year period was $216.7 million, and in the more
than 5 year period was $632.4 million. There were no other significant changes
to our contractual obligations and other commercial commitments during the six
months ended November 27, 2005.

We are not a party to any off-balance sheet arrangements that have, or are
reasonably likely to have, a current or future material effect on our financial
condition, changes in financial condition, sales or expenses, results of
operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources. We are not
aware of any trends or events that would materially affect our capital
requirements or liquidity. We believe that our internal cash generating
capabilities and borrowings available under our shelf registration statement for
unsecured debt securities and short-term commercial paper program will be
sufficient to finance our capital expenditures, dividends, stock repurchase
program and other operating activities through fiscal 2006.

18
FINANCIAL CONDITION

Our current assets totaled $463 million at November 27, 2005, compared to
$407 million at May 29, 2005. The increase resulted primarily from an increase
of $30 million in cash and cash equivalents and $10 million in short-term
investments. These increases are primarily due to the portion of the proceeds
remaining from the issuance of $300 million of senior notes in August 2005.
Inventories of $247 million at November 27, 2005, increased from $235 million at
May 29, 2005, principally due to seasonality.

Our current liabilities totaled $889 million at November 27, 2005, compared
to $1.04 billion at May 29, 2005. Accounts payable of $210 million at November
27, 2005, increased from $191 million at May 29, 2005, principally due to the
timing and terms of inventory purchases, capital expenditures and related
payments. Accrued payroll of $103 million at November 27, 2005, decreased from
$115 million at May 29, 2005, principally due to the payout of the fiscal 2005
incentive compensation during the first quarter of fiscal 2006, which is
partially offset by the amounts accrued for fiscal 2006 incentive compensation.
Current portion of long-term debt decreased from $300 million to $150 million
due to the repayment of $150 million of unsecured 8.375 percent senior notes at
maturity in September 2005. Long-term debt of $646 million at November 27, 2005,
increased from $350 million at May 29, 2005, primarily from the issuance of $300
million of senior notes in August 2005.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

We prepare our consolidated financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The
preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements, and the reported amounts of sales and expenses during the reporting
period (see Note 1, "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" under Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8, "Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data" of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
May 29, 2005). Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Critical accounting policies are those we believe are both most important
to the portrayal of our financial condition and operating results and require
our most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of the
need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently
uncertain. Judgments and uncertainties affecting the application of those
policies may result in materially different amounts being reported under
different conditions or using different assumptions. We consider the following
policies to be most critical in understanding the judgments that are involved in
preparing our consolidated financial statements.

Land, Buildings and Equipment

Land, buildings and equipment are recorded at cost less accumulated
depreciation. Building components are depreciated over estimated useful lives
ranging from seven to 40 years using the straight-line method. Leasehold
improvements, which are reflected on our consolidated balance sheets as a
component of buildings, are amortized over the lesser of the expected lease
term, including cancelable option periods, or the estimated useful lives of the
related assets using the straight-line method. Equipment is depreciated over
estimated useful lives ranging from two to 10 years, also using the
straight-line method. Accelerated depreciation methods are generally used for
income tax purposes.

Our accounting policies regarding land, buildings and equipment, including
leasehold improvements, include our judgments regarding the estimated useful
lives of these assets, the residual values to which the assets are depreciated
or amortized, the determination of what constitutes expected lease term and the
determination as to what constitutes enhancing the value of or increasing the
life of existing assets. These judgments and estimates could produce materially
different amounts of reported depreciation and amortization expense if different
assumptions were used. As discussed further below, these judgments may also
impact our need to recognize an impairment charge on the carrying amount of
these assets as the cash flows associated with the assets are realized.

Leases

We are obligated under various lease agreements for certain restaurants. We
recognize rent expense on a straight-line basis over the expected lease term,
including cancelable option periods as described below. Within the provisions of
certain of our leases, there are rent holidays and/or escalations in payments
over the base lease term, as well as renewal periods. The effects of the
holidays and escalations have been reflected in rent expense on a

19
straight-line  basis over the expected  lease term,  which  includes  cancelable
option periods when it is deemed to be reasonably assured that we would incur an
economic penalty for not exercising the option. The lease term commences on the
date when we have the right to control the use of the leased property, which is
typically before rent payments are due under the terms of the lease. Many of our
leases have renewal periods totaling five to 20 years, exercisable at our option
and require payment of property taxes, insurance and maintenance costs in
addition to the rent payments. The consolidated financial statements reflect the
same lease term for amortizing leasehold improvements as we use to determine
capital versus operating lease classifications and in calculating straight-line
rent expense for each restaurant. Percentage rent expense is generally based
upon sales levels and is accrued at the point in time we determine that it is
probable that such sales levels will be achieved.

Our judgments related to the probable operating term for each restaurant
affect the classification and accounting for leases as capital versus operating,
the rent holidays and escalation in payments that are included in the
calculation of straight-line rent and the term over which leasehold improvements
for each restaurant facility are amortized. These judgments may produce
materially different amounts of depreciation, amortization and rent expense than
would be reported if different assumed lease terms were used.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

Land, buildings and equipment and certain other assets, including
capitalized software costs and liquor licenses, are reviewed for impairment
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of
an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is
measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of the assets to the future
undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the assets. Identifiable
cash flows are measured at the lowest level for which they are largely
independent of the cash flows of other groups of assets and liabilities,
generally at the restaurant level. If these assets are determined to be
impaired, the amount of impairment recognized is the amount by which the
carrying amount of the assets exceeds their fair value. Fair value is generally
determined by appraisals or sales prices of comparable assets. Restaurant sites
and certain other assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of their
carrying amount or fair value, less estimated costs to sell. Restaurant sites
and certain other assets to be disposed of are included in assets held for sale
when certain criteria are met. These criteria include the requirement that the
likelihood of disposing of these assets within one year is probable. Assets
whose disposal is not probable within one year remain in land, buildings and
equipment until their disposal is probable within one year.

The judgments we make related to the expected useful lives of long-lived
assets and our ability to realize undiscounted cash flows in excess of the
carrying amounts of these assets are affected by factors such as the ongoing
maintenance and improvements of the assets, changes in economic conditions and
changes in usage or operating performance. As we assess the ongoing expected
cash flows and carrying amounts of our long-lived assets, significant adverse
changes in these factors could cause us to realize a material impairment charge.
During fiscal 2005, we recognized asset impairment charges of $6 million ($4
million after-tax) for the write-down of two Olive Garden restaurants, one Red
Lobster restaurant and one Smokey Bones restaurant based on an evaluation of
expected cash flows. These restaurants were closed in fiscal 2006.

Insurance Accruals

Through the use of insurance program deductibles and self-insurance, we
retain a significant portion of expected losses under our workers' compensation,
employee medical and general liability programs. However, we carry insurance for
individual claims that generally exceed $0.25 million for workers' compensation
and general liability claims. Accrued liabilities have been recorded based on
our estimates of the anticipated ultimate costs to settle all claims, both
reported and not yet reported.

Our accounting policies regarding these insurance programs include our
judgments and independent actuarial assumptions regarding economic conditions,
the frequency or severity of claims and claim development patterns and claim
reserve, management and settlement practices. Unanticipated changes in these
factors may produce materially different amounts of reported expense under these
programs.

20
Income Taxes

We estimate certain components of our provision for income taxes. These
estimates include, among other items, depreciation and amortization expense
allowable for tax purposes, allowable tax credits for items such as taxes paid
on reported employee tip income, effective rates for state and local income
taxes and the tax deductibility of certain other items.

Our estimates are based on the best available information at the time
that we prepare the provision. We generally file our annual income tax returns
several months after our fiscal year-end. Income tax returns are subject to
audit by federal, state and local governments, generally years after the returns
are filed. These returns could be subject to material adjustments or differing
interpretations of the tax laws.

FUTURE APPLICATION OF ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (Revised), "Share-Based
Payment." SFAS No. 123R revises SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation" and generally requires the cost associated with employee services
received in exchange for an award of equity instruments to be measured based on
the grant-date fair value of the award and recognized in the financial
statements over the period during which employees are required to provide
service in exchange for the award. SFAS No. 123R also provides guidance on how
to determine the grant-date fair value for awards of equity instruments as well
as alternative methods of adopting its requirements. SFAS No. 123R is effective
for annual reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2005. As disclosed in Note
3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, based on the current assumptions and
calculations used, had we recognized compensation expense based on the fair
value of awards of equity instruments, net earnings would have been reduced by
approximately $3 million and $8 million for quarter and six months ended
November 27, 2005, respectively, and $4 million and $8 million for the quarter
and six months ended November 28, 2004, respectively. We have not yet determined
the method of adoption or the effect of adopting SFAS No. 123R and have not
determined whether the adoption will result in future amounts similar to the
current pro forma disclosures under SFAS No. 123.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain statements included in this report and other materials filed or to
be filed by us with the SEC (as well as information included in oral or written
statements made or to be made by us) may contain statements that are
forward-looking within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform
Act of 1995, as codified in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
"Exchange Act"). Words or phrases such as "believe," "plan," "will," "expect,"
"intend," "estimate," and "project," and similar expressions are intended to
identify forward-looking statements. All of these statements, and any other
statements in this report that are not historical facts, are forward-looking.
Examples of forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to,
projections regarding: our growth plans and the number and type of expected new
restaurant openings and related capital expenditures; same-restaurant sales
growth; expected diluted net earnings per share growth; expected trends that
might impact capital requirements and liquidity; expected contributions to our
defined benefit pension plans; and the impact of litigation on our financial
position; and the impact of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita on our fiscal 2006 sales
and net earnings. These forward-looking statements are based on assumptions
concerning important factors, risks and uncertainties that could significantly
affect anticipated results in the future and, accordingly, could cause the
actual results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking
statements. These factors, risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited
to:

o intense competition, especially with respect to pricing, service, location,
personnel and type and quality of food;
o economic and business factors, both specific to the restaurant industry and
general economic factors, including changes in consumer preferences,
demographic trends, severe weather, a protracted economic slowdown or
worsening economy, industry-wide cost pressures, public safety conditions,
including actual or threatened armed conflicts or terrorist attacks, and
public health conditions, including an actual or potential avian flu
pandemic;
o the price and availability of food, ingredients and utilities, including
the general risk of inflation;
o labor and insurance costs, including increased labor costs as a result of
federal and state-mandated increases in minimum wage rates and increased
insurance costs as a result of increases in our current insurance premiums;
o increased advertising and marketing costs;
o higher-than-anticipated costs to open, close, relocate or remodel
restaurants;

21
o    litigation  by employees,  consumers,  suppliers,  shareholders  or others,
regardless of whether the allegations made against us are valid or we are
ultimately found liable;
o unfavorable publicity relating to food safety or other concerns;
o a lack of suitable new restaurant locations or a decline in the quality of
the locations of our current restaurants;
o government regulations, including federal, state and local laws and
regulations relating to our relationships with our employees, zoning, land
use, environmental matters and liquor licenses; and
o a failure to achieve growth objectives, including lower-than-expected sales
and profitability of newly-opened restaurants, our expansion of newer
concepts that have not yet proven their long-term viability, our ability to
develop new concepts, risks associated with growth through acquisitions and
our ability to manage risks relating to the opening of new restaurants,
including real estate development and construction activities, union
activities, the issuance and renewal of licenses and permits, the
availability of funds to finance growth and our ability to hire and train
qualified personnel.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

We are exposed to a variety of market risks, including fluctuations in
interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and commodity prices. To manage
this exposure, we periodically enter into interest rate, foreign currency
exchange and commodity instruments for other than trading purposes.

We use the variance/covariance method to measure value at risk, over time
horizons ranging from one week to one year, at the 95 percent confidence level.
As of November 27, 2005, our potential losses in future net earnings resulting
from changes in foreign currency exchange rate instruments, commodity
instruments and floating rate debt interest rate exposures were approximately $8
million over a period of one year. The value at risk from an increase in the
fair value of all of our long-term fixed rate debt, over a period of one year,
was approximately $51 million. The fair value of our long-term fixed rate debt
during the first six months of fiscal 2006 averaged $775 million, with a high of
$967 million and a low of $651 million. The increase in the fair value of our
long-term fixed rate debt is primarily due to the issuance of $300 million of
senior notes in August 2005. A portion of the proceeds from this issuance was
used to repay at maturity our outstanding $150 million of 8.375 percent senior
notes on September 15, 2005. We intend to use the remaining proceeds from the
issuance to repay at maturity our outstanding $150 million of 6.375 percent
notes due February 1, 2006.

Our interest rate risk management objective is to limit the impact of
interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows by targeting an appropriate mix
of variable and fixed rate debt.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management,
including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, we
evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as
of November 27, 2005, the end of the period covered by this report. Based on
that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of
November 27, 2005.

During the fiscal quarter ended November 27, 2005, there was no change in
our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f)
under the Exchange Act) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

22
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

We are subject to private lawsuits, administrative proceedings and claims
that arise in the ordinary course of our business. A number of these lawsuits,
proceedings and claims may exist at any given time. These matters typically
involve claims from guests, employees and others related to operational issues
common to the restaurant industry, and can also involve infringement of, or
challenges to, our trademarks. While the resolution of a lawsuit, proceeding or
claim may have an impact on our financial results for the period in which it is
resolved, we believe that the final disposition of the lawsuits, proceedings and
claims in which we are currently involved, either individually or in the
aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position,
results of operations or liquidity.

Like other restaurant companies and retail employers, we have been faced in
a few states with allegations of purported class-wide wage and hour violations.
The following is a brief description of the more significant of these matters.
In view of the inherent uncertainties of litigation, the outcome of any
unresolved matter described below cannot be predicted at this time, nor can the
amount of any potential loss be reasonably estimated.

In March 2003 and March 2002, two purported class action lawsuits were
brought against us in the Superior Court of Orange County, California by three
current and former hourly restaurant employees alleging violations of California
labor laws with respect to providing meal and rest breaks. Although we continue
to believe we provided the required meal and rest breaks to our employees, to
avoid potentially costly and protracted litigation, we agreed during the second
quarter of fiscal 2005 to settle both lawsuits and a similar case filed in
Sacramento County for approximately $9.5 million. Terms of the settlement, which
do not include any admission of liability by us, have received preliminary
judicial approval, and claims administration is underway. During the quarter
ended November 27, 2005, we paid $3.7 million towards the settlement of these
claims. The remaining $5.8 million was paid in December 2005 and is included in
other current liabilities at November 27, 2005.

In August 2003, three former employees in Washington filed a similar
purported class action in Washington State Superior Court in Spokane County
alleging violations of Washington labor laws with respect to providing rest
breaks. The Court stayed the action and ordered the plaintiffs into our
mandatory arbitration program. The plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration was
not granted; their appeal of the denial of reconsideration was also not granted,
and the plaintiffs subsequently filed a demand for arbitration. We believe we
provided the required meal and rest breaks to our employees, and we intend to
vigorously defend our position in this case.

Beginning in 2002, a total of five purported class action lawsuits were
filed in Superior Courts of California (two each in Los Angeles County and
Orange County, and one in Sacramento County) in which the plaintiffs allege that
they and other current and former service managers, beverage and hospitality
managers and culinary managers were improperly classified as exempt employees
under California labor laws. The plaintiffs seek unpaid overtime wages and
penalties. Two of the cases have been removed to arbitration under our mandatory
arbitration program, one has been stayed to allow consideration of judicial
coordination with the other cases, one is proceeding as an individual claim, and
one remains a purported class action litigation matter. We believe we properly
classified these employees as exempt under California law, and we intend to
vigorously defend against all claims in these lawsuits.

23
Item 2.   Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

The table below provides information concerning our repurchase of shares of
our common stock during the quarter ended November 27, 2005. Since commencing
repurchases in December 1995, we have repurchased a total of 126.4 million
shares under authorizations from our Board of Directors to repurchase an
aggregate of 137.4 million shares.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

- ---------------------------------- ------------------- -------------- ----------------------- -----------------------
Total Number of Maximum Number of
Shares Purchased as Shares that
Total Number Average Part of Publicly May Yet be Purchased
of Shares Price Paid Announced Plans or Under the Plans or
Period Purchased (1) per Share Programs Programs (2)
- ---------------------------------- ------------------- -------------- ----------------------- -----------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
August 29, 2005 through October
2, 2005 1,785,051 $30.88 1,785,051 10,976,004
- ---------------------------------- ------------------- -------------- ----------------------- -----------------------
October 3, 2005 through
October 30, 2005 -- -- -- 10,976,004
- ---------------------------------- ------------------- -------------- ----------------------- -----------------------
October 31, 2005 through
November 27, 2005 130 $33.28 130 10,975,874
- ---------------------------------- ------------------- -------------- ----------------------- -----------------------
Total 1,785,181 $30.88 1,785,181 10,975,874
- ---------------------------------- ------------------- -------------- ----------------------- -----------------------
</TABLE>

(1) All of the shares purchased during the quarter ended November 27, 2005 were
purchased as part of our repurchase program, the authority for which was
increased to an aggregate of 137.4 million shares by our Board of Directors
on September 28, 2004, and announced publicly in a press release issued the
same day. There is no expiration date for our program. The number of shares
purchased includes shares withheld for taxes on vesting of restricted stock
and shares delivered or deemed to be delivered to us on tender of stock in
payment for the exercise price of options. These shares are included as
part of our repurchase program and deplete the repurchase authority granted
by our Board. The number of shares repurchased excludes shares we
reacquired pursuant to tax withholding on option exercises or forfeiture of
restricted stock.
(2) Repurchases are subject to prevailing market prices, may be made in open
market or private transactions and may occur or be discontinued at any
time. There can be no assurance that we will repurchase any shares.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

(a) Our Annual Meeting of Shareholders was held on September 21,
2005.

(b) The name of each director elected at the meeting is provided in
Item 4(c) of this report. There are no other directors with a
term of office that continued after the Annual Meeting.

(c) At the Annual Meeting, the shareholders took the following
actions:

(i) Elected the following fourteen directors:

For Withheld
----------- -------------
Leonard L. Berry 129,416,206 4,272,746
Odie C. Donald 128,403,759 5,285,193
David H. Hughes 128,336,833 5,352,119
Charles A. Ledsinger, Jr. 131,116,719 2,572,233
Joe R. Lee* 122,737,587 10,951,365
William M. Lewis, Jr. 132,342,827 1,346,125
Senator Connie Mack,III 127,979,614 5,709,338
Andrew H. Madsen 129,436,253 4,252,699
Clarence Otis, Jr. 129,417,682 4,271,270
Michael D. Rose 126,043,862 7,645,091
Maria A. Sastre 128,285,308 5,403,644
Jack A. Smith 128,223,447 5,465,505
Blaine Sweatt, III 129,387,049 4,301,903
Rita P. Wilson 129,442,175 4,246,777

24
* Mr. Lee  retired as  Chairman  of the  Company's  Board of
Directors, and was succeeded as Chairman by Clarence Otis,
Jr., effective November 29, 2005.

(ii) Ratified the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent
registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending
May 28, 2006.

For 123,306,660
Against 9,002,075
Abstain 1,380,217

Item 5. Other Information

In accordance with expectations disclosed in our Current Report on Form 8-K
filed August 11, 2004, our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
August 29, 2004, and our Proxy Statement dated August 9, 2005, Joe R. Lee
retired as Chairman of our Board of Directors effective November 29, 2005, and
Clarence Otis, Jr., our Chief Executive Office, became Chairman at that time.
Mr. Lee is no longer an officer or director of the Company, and Mr. Otis is our
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.


Item 6. Exhibits

Exhibit 10 Darden Restaurants, Inc. Director Compensation Program,
effective as of October 1, 2005 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10 to our Current Report on Form
8-K filed December 15, 2005).

Exhibit 12 Computation of Ratio of Consolidated Earnings to Fixed
Charges.

Exhibit 31(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Exhibit 31(b) Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Exhibit 32(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Exhibit 32(b) Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

25
SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


DARDEN RESTAURANTS, INC.


Dated: January 5, 2006 By: /s/Paula J. Shives
------------------------------
Paula J. Shives
Senior Vice President,
General Counsel and Secretary



Dated: January 5, 2006 By: /s/Linda J. Dimopoulos
------------------------------
Linda J. Dimopoulos
Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer (Principal
financial officer)


26
INDEX TO EXHIBITS


Exhibit
Number Exhibit Title

10 Darden Restaurants, Inc. Director Compensation Program, effective as of
October 1, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10 to our Current
Report on Form 8-K filed December 15, 2005).

12 Computation of Ratio of Consolidated Earnings to Fixed Charges.

31(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31(b) Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32(b) Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


27