SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWashington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2001
or
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission File Number 1-5424
DELTA AIR LINES, INC.
State of Incorporation: Delaware
IRS Employer Identification No.: 58-0218548
Hartsfield Atlanta International Airport, Atlanta, Georgia 30320
Telephone: (404) 715-2600
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]
Number of shares outstanding by each class of common stock,as of July 31, 2001:
Common Stock, $1.50 par value 123,071,622 shares outstanding
TABLE OF CONTENTS
FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
Statements in this Form 10-Q which are not purely historical facts, including statements about our estimates, expectations, beliefs, intentions or strategies for the future, may be forward-looking statements as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from historical experience or our present expectations.
Factors that could cause these differences include, but are not limited to, general economic conditions, including the extent of the current weakening in the U.S. economy and the related decline in business travel; competitive factors in our industry, including mergers and acquisitions; outcomes of negotiations on collective bargaining agreements and other labor matters; changes in aircraft fuel prices; disruptions to operations due to adverse weather conditions or air traffic control-related constraints; fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; governmental actions; the willingness of customers to travel generally and with us specifically; and the outcome of our litigation.
Caution should be taken not to place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements, which are current only as of the date of this Form 10-Q. More detailed information about risks and uncertainties as of other dates can be read in Deltas past and future Forms 10-K and 10-Q and certain Forms 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
CHANGE IN YEAR END
Effective December 31, 2000, Delta changed its year end from June 30 to December 31. This Form 10-Q includes Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2001 (unaudited) and December 31, 2000, unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000, and unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000.
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
DELTA AIR LINES, INC.Consolidated Balance Sheets(In Millions, Except Share Data)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
2
3
DELTA AIR LINES, INC.Consolidated Statements of Operations(Unaudited)(In Millions, Except Share Data)
4
DELTA AIR LINES, INC.Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows(Unaudited)(In Millions)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
DELTA AIR LINES, INC.Statistical Summary(Unaudited)
6
DELTA AIR LINES, INC.Notes to Consolidated Financial StatementsJune 30, 2001(Unaudited)
1. ACCOUNTING AND REPORTING POLICIES
2. SALE OF RECEIVABLES
7
3. MARKETABLE AND OTHER EQUITY SECURITIES
8
4. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS
9
5. AIRCRAFT FLEET AND PURCHASE COMMITMENTS
10
6. DEBT INSTRUMENTS
11
7. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
12
8. SHAREOWNERS EQUITY
13
9. GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
14
10. EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
15
11. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
16
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Business Environment
Our financial results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2001 were materially affected by the slowing U.S. economy and pilot labor issues at both Delta and Comair.
Economy. The slowing U.S. economy has reduced the demand for air travel among both business travelers and leisure passengers. This decline in demand has negatively impacted our passenger mile yield and traffic for the three and six months ended June 30, 2001. Based on current economic indicators, we believe these revenue pressures will continue at least through the end of calendar 2001.
Delta Pilot Labor Issues. In December 2000, we canceled a substantial number of flights due to a job action by some Delta pilots which significantly reduced pilot availability for overtime (or additional) flying. To provide more reliable service to our customers, we lowered the need for overtime flying by reducing Deltas mainline flight schedule from the previously planned levels by 2.7% for the March 2001 quarter and 2.4% for the June 2001 quarter.
Public concern over a possible strike by Delta pilots caused some customers to make reservations and travel with airlines other than Delta during the three and six months ended June 30, 2001. On June 20, 2001, Delta pilots ratified a new collective bargaining agreement, avoiding a possible strike.
Comair Pilot Labor Issues. Comair pilots ratified a new collective bargaining agreement on June 22, 2001, ending an 89-day strike. As a result of the strike, Comair suspended its operations between March 26 and July 1. We estimate that the Comair strike reduced our consolidated net income by approximately $195 million for the three months ended June 30, 2001.
Comair resumed partial service on July 2, 2001 and was operating at about 50% of pre-strike capacity by the end of July. We expect Comair to operate at approximately 80% of pre-strike capacity by September 30, 2001 and at about 90% of pre-strike capacity by December 31, 2001.
We believe the costs associated with restoring Comairs operations to pre-strike levels will negatively impact our financial performance during the remaining six months of calendar 2001. These costs include retraining pilots, rebuilding the Comair workforce and offering fare sales to attract customers.
17
Outlook for September 2001 Quarter
Delta has taken various actions which are intended to lessen the negative impact of the slowing U.S. economy on our future financial performance. These include adjusting fleet capacity and improving fleet efficiency by the early phase out of 19 aircraft from scheduled service beginning in September 2001 through 2002; instituting a hiring freeze; announcing plans to reallocate aircraft to reduce low yield flying; and reducing advertising, consulting and contractor costs. Notwithstanding these initiatives, we believe that the current economic environment and the costs associated with restoring Comairs operations to pre-strike levels will likely result in a reported loss for the September 2001 quarter.
Three Months Ended June 30, 2001 and 2000
Net Income (Loss) and Earnings (Loss) per Share
Our unaudited consolidated net loss was $90 million for the June 2001 quarter ($0.76 diluted loss per share), compared to net income of $460 million ($3.51 diluted earnings per share) in the June 2000 quarter.
Excluding the unusual items described below, our net loss was $123 million in the June 2001 quarter ($1.03 diluted loss per share), compared to net income of $374 million ($2.85 diluted earnings per share) in the June 2000 quarter.
Unusual Items
Our results of operations for the June 2001 and June 2000 quarters include the following items, which are collectively referred to as unusual items in this discussion of the three months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000.
June 2001 Quarter
18
June 2000 Quarter
Operating Revenues
Our operating revenues totaled $3.8 billion in the June 2001 quarter, a 16% decrease from $4.5 billion in the June 2000 quarter. Passenger revenue decreased 16% to $3.5 billion, reflecting an 8% decrease in revenue passenger miles and an 8% decrease in passenger mile yield. These decreases were primarily the result of the slowing U.S. economy and pilot labor issues at both Delta and Comair.
North American Passenger Revenues North American passenger revenues fell 19% to $2.9 billion for the June 2001 quarter. Revenue passenger miles decreased 11% on a capacity decrease of 5%, while passenger mile yield decreased 10%. The decline in North American passenger revenues and the passenger mile yield were the result of the slowing U.S. economy and pilot labor issues at both Delta and Comair.
International Passenger Revenues International passenger revenues increased 3% to $675 million during the June 2001 quarter. Revenue passenger miles remained flat while capacity increased 9%, reflecting our continued international expansion, particularly in Latin American markets. Passenger mile yield rose 3%.
Cargo and Other Revenues Cargo revenues fell $14 million, or 10%, in the June 2001 quarter primarily due to the slowing U.S. and Asian economies. Cargo ton miles decreased 13%, and the cargo ton mile yield increased 4%. Other revenues decreased $26 million, or 19%, primarily due to lower codeshare revenue, which is commensurate with the slowing economy.
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses for the June 2001 quarter totaled $3.9 billion, which were flat compared to the June 2000 quarter. Operating capacity decreased 2% to 38 billion available seat miles. Excluding unusual items, cost per available seat mile (CASM) increased 3.6% to 10.02¢, while non-fuel CASM grew 3.8% to 8.81¢. The increase in CASM is primarily related to a reduction in capacity from planned levels due to pilot labor issues at Delta and Comair, as well as an increase in salaries and related costs, during the June 2001 quarter.
Salaries and related costs totaled $1.6 billion in the June 2001 quarter, a 4% increase from $1.5 billion recorded in the June 2000 quarter. The increase in salaries and related costs was
19
driven primarily by higher pilot costs and an increase in aircraft maintenance technician headcount. These increases were partially offset by lower salaries at Comair due to the pilot strike and the related employee lay-offs.
Aircraft fuel expense during the June 2001 quarter remained flat compared to the June 2000 quarter. The average fuel price per gallon rose 9% to 67.95¢ and total gallons consumed decreased 8% due to the pilot strike at Comair and benefits from our fleet renewal efforts. Our fuel cost is shown net of fuel hedge gains of $102 million in the June 2001 quarter and $133 million in the June 2000 quarter. Prior to the adoption of SFAS 133 on July 1, 2000, the fuel hedge gains that were netted against fuel expense included the total fuel-related hedge premiums. Upon adoption of SFAS 133, we began including all changes in the time value component related to any fuel hedge premiums in the calculation of the ineffective portion of our hedge performance. These amounts are recorded in fair value adjustments of SFAS 133 derivatives in our Consolidated Statement of Operations. Approximately 60% and 79% of our aircraft fuel requirements were hedged during the June 2001 and 2000 quarters, respectively.
Depreciation and amortization expense rose 10% due to the acquisition of 79 new aircraft since June 30, 2000. Contracted services expense increased 8%, primarily a result of previously negotiated rate increases for ramp handling, cabin cleaning and security services. Landing fees and other rents and aircraft rental expense remained flat, and aircraft maintenance materials and outside repairs expense decreased 1%. Other selling expenses decreased 5% due primarily to the Comair strike.
Passenger commissions expense declined 18%, primarily as a result of lower passenger revenues combined with our customers increased use of lower cost distribution channels such as the Internet. Internet sales accounted for approximately 13% of passenger revenues in the June 2001 quarter (approximately half of which relates to revenues from delta.com) compared to 9% in the June 2000 quarter. Passenger service expense increased 12% as a result of higher food costs. Other operating expenses decreased 10%, primarily the result of lower fuel-related taxes and lower professional fees.
Operating Income and Operating Margin
We incurred an operating loss of $114 million for the June 2001 quarter, compared to operating income of $606 million in the June 2000 quarter. Operating margin, which is the ratio of operating income (loss) to operating revenues, was (3%) and 14% for the June 2001 and June 2000 quarters, respectively.
Other Income (Expense)
Other income in the June 2001 quarter was $15 million, compared to other income of $169 million in the June 2000 quarter. Interest expense, net increased $24 million, or 36%, primarily due to higher levels of debt outstanding. As discussed previously, the June 2001 quarter includes a $112 million non-cash gain for fair market value adjustments related to SFAS 133 and a $7 million gain on the sale of priceline common stock (see Notes 4 and 3, respectively, of the Notes
20
to Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q). The June 2000 quarter includes a $228 million non-cash gain from the exchange of priceline common stock for preferred stock.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2001 and 2000
Our unaudited consolidated net loss was $223 million for the six months ended June 30, 2001 ($1.87 diluted loss per share), compared to net income of $677 million ($5.11 diluted earnings per share) for the six months ended June 30, 2000.
Excluding the unusual items described below, our net loss was $246 million for the six months ended June 30, 2001 ($2.05 diluted loss per share), compared to net income of $546 million ($4.11 diluted earnings per share) for the six months ended June 30, 2000.
Our results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000 include the following items, which are collectively referred to as unusual items in this discussion of the six months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2001
Six Months Ended June 30, 2000
21
Our operating revenues totaled $7.6 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2001, a 9% decrease from $8.4 billion during the six months ended June 30, 2000. Passenger revenue decreased 9% to $7.1 billion, reflecting a 5% decrease in revenue passenger miles and a 5% decrease in passenger mile yield. These decreases were primarily the result of the slowing U.S. economy and pilot labor issues at both Delta and Comair.
North American Passenger Revenues North American passenger revenues fell 12% to $5.9 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2001. Revenue passenger miles decreased 8% on a capacity decrease of 4%, while passenger mile yield decreased 5%. The decline in North American passenger revenues and passenger mile yield were the result of the slowing U.S. economy and pilot labor issues at both Delta and Comair.
International Passenger Revenues International passenger revenues increased 10% to $1.2 billion during the six months ended June 30, 2001. Revenue passenger miles increased 4% on a capacity increase of 12%, reflecting our continuing international expansion, particularly in Latin American markets. Passenger mile yield rose 5%.
Cargo and Other Revenues Cargo revenues fell $15 million, or 5%, for the six months ended June 30, 2001 primarily due to the slowing U.S. and Asian economies. Cargo ton miles decreased 7%, and the cargo ton mile yield increased 2%. Other revenues decreased $26 million, or 11%, primarily due to lower codeshare revenues in the June 2001 quarter, which is commensurate with the slowing economy.
Operating expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2001 totaled $7.8 billion, rising 6% from the six months ended June 30, 2000. Operating capacity remained flat at 76 billion available seat miles. Excluding unusual items, CASM increased 6.4% to 10.25¢, while non-fuel CASM grew 6.0% to 8.96¢. The increase in CASM is primarily related to a reduction in capacity from planned levels due to pilot labor issues at Delta and Comair, as well as an increase in salaries and related costs, during the six months ended June 30, 2001.
Salaries and related costs totaled $3.2 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2001, an 8% increase from $2.9 billion recorded for the six months ended June 30, 2000. The increase in salaries and related costs primarily relates to increased pilot costs, a salary increase of 3% for most domestic non-union employees on April 1, 2000, and a 3% increase in average headcount.
22
Aircraft fuel expense increased 9% during the six months ended June 30, 2001. The average fuel price per gallon rose 14% to 70.91¢ and total gallons consumed decreased 5% due to the pilot strike at Comair and benefits from our fleet renewal efforts. Our fuel cost is shown net of fuel hedge gains of $208 million for the six months ended June 30, 2001 and $279 million for the six months ended June 30, 2000. Prior to the adoption of SFAS 133 on July 1, 2000, the fuel hedge gains that were netted against fuel expense included the total fuel-related hedge premiums. Upon adoption of SFAS 133, we began including all changes in the time value component related to any fuel hedge premiums in the calculation of the ineffective portion of our hedge performance. These amounts are recorded in fair value adjustments of SFAS 133 derivatives in our Consolidated Statement of Operations. Approximately 59% and 81% of our aircraft fuel requirements were hedged during the six months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
Depreciation and amortization expense rose 9% due to the acquisition of 79 new aircraft since June 30, 2000. Contracted services expense increased 10%, primarily as a result of previously negotiated rate increases for ramp handling, cabin cleaning and security services as well as higher maintenance and technology costs. Landing fees and other rents rose 4%, aircraft rent expense increased 1%, and aircraft maintenance materials and outside repairs expense grew 4%. Other selling expenses increased 3% due to higher advertising costs related to new service promotions and our sponsorship of the 2002 Winter Olympics, partially offset by the Comair strike.
Passenger commissions expense declined 17%, primarily as a result of lower passenger revenues combined with our customers increased use of lower cost distribution channels such as the Internet. Internet sales accounted for approximately 12% of passenger revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2001 compared to 8% for the six months ended June 30, 2000. Passenger service expense increased 13% as a result of higher food costs. Other operating expenses increased 2% primarily as a result of higher interrupted trip expense as well as the rollout of our new uniforms, partially offset by lower fuel-related taxes.
We incurred an operating loss of $229 million for the six months ended June 30, 2001, compared to operating income of $949 million for the six months ended June 30, 2000. Operating margin, which is the ratio of operating income (loss) to operating revenues, was (3%) and 11% for the six months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
Other expense for the six months ended June 30, 2001 was $92 million, compared to other income of $190 million for the six months ended June 30, 2000. Interest expense, net increased $41 million, or 30%, primarily due to higher levels of debt outstanding. As discussed previously, the six months ended June 30, 2001 includes a $95 million non-cash gain for fair market value adjustments related to SFAS 133 and a $7 million gain on the sale of priceline common stock (see Notes 4 and 3, respectively, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q). The six months ended June 30, 2000 includes a $73 million gain from our sale of priceline
23
common stock and a $228 million non-cash gain from the exchange of priceline common stock for preferred stock.
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments totaled $1.5 billion at June 30, 2001, compared to $1.6 billion at December 31, 2000. Our principal sources and uses of cash during the six months ended June 30, 2001 are summarized below:
Sources:
Uses:
Delta may prepay its long-term debt and repurchase its common stock from time to time. For information regarding our common stock repurchase authorization, see Note 14 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (page 32) in our Annual Report.
As of June 30, 2001, we had a negative working capital position of $3.2 billion, compared to negative working capital of $2.0 billion at December 31, 2000. The change in our working capital position during the six months ended June 30, 2001 was primarily the result of our $1.5 billion investment in capital assets and lower revenues due to the slowing U.S. economy and pilot labor issues. As discussed below, we borrowed $800 million under our 1997 Bank Credit Agreement, and that borrowing is included in current liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. A negative working capital position is normal for us, primarily due to our air traffic liability, and does not indicate a lack of liquidity. We expect to meet our obligations as they become due through available cash, short-term investments and internally generated funds, supplemented as necessary by borrowings and proceeds from sale and leaseback transactions.
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations (including current maturities) totaled $6.8 billion at June 30, 2001, compared to $6.0 billion at December 31, 2000. Shareowners equity was $5.0 billion at June 30, 2001 and $5.3 billion at December 31, 2000. Our net debt-to-capital position was 74% at June 30, 2001 and 71% at December 31, 2000.
24
2001 Bank Credit Agreement
On April 6, 2001, we entered into a credit agreement with a group of banks under which we may borrow up to $1 billion on an unsecured and revolving basis until April 4, 2003, subject to our compliance with certain conditions (2001 Bank Credit Agreement). We may borrow under this facility only to finance our liquidity and working capital needs in the event of an actual business interruption or if, in our reasonable judgment, there is the prospect of a business interruption, or to fund contingency plans in connection with such business interruption. The interest rate for borrowings under this facility is, at our option, (1) the base rate; or (2) LIBOR plus a margin that varies between 0.625% and 1.7% depending on our long-term senior unsecured debt ratings. As of June 30, 2001, there were no borrowings outstanding under the 2001 Bank Credit Agreement.
1997 Bank Credit Agreement
On April 30, 2001, we borrowed $800 million under our 1997 Bank Credit Agreement. Subject to our compliance with certain conditions, we may borrow up to a total of $1.25 billion under this facility on an unsecured and revolving basis until May 1, 2002. Borrowings under this facility are available for general corporate purposes, may be prepaid by us at any time without penalty and currently bear interest at LIBOR plus a margin of 0.375% (with the existing interest rate being 4.115%).
The 1997 Bank Credit Agreement contains certain negative covenants, including a negative covenant that provides that our consolidated Current Debt (as defined below) outstanding at any time may not exceed 100% of our consolidated accounts receivable outstanding as of the last day of the second calendar month next preceding the month in which the calculation of Current Debt is made (Current Debt Covenant). For purposes of this covenant, Current Debt means any obligation for borrowed money payable on demand or within a period of one year from its date of creation.
Our $800 million borrowing under the 1997 Bank Credit Agreement on April 30, 2001 enabled us to access this additional liquidity under the Current Debt Covenant. This borrowing is not treated as Current Debt for purposes of the Current Debt Covenant because it is not payable within one year from its date of creation. However, had this borrowing occurred after May 1, 2001, it would have constituted Current Debt under the Current Debt Covenant.
Our ability to incur additional indebtedness under the 1997 Bank Credit Agreement prior to its termination on May 1, 2002 will depend on the application of the Current Debt Covenant to us in the future. At June 30, 2001, our consolidated Current Debt (as defined above) and consolidated accounts receivable were $0 and $621 million, respectively.
25
At June 30, 2001, $800 million of borrowings were outstanding under the 1997 Bank Credit Agreement. This amount is included in current liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. For additional information about this facility and our long-term debt, see Note 7 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (pages 24-26) in our Annual Report.
Other Matters
At its meeting on July 26, 2001, our Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of 2.5 cents per common share, payable September 1, 2001, to shareowners of record on August 8, 2001.
We have entered into a development agreement with the Massachusetts Port Authority (Massport) and are negotiating the lease and financing arrangements for our redevelopment and expansion of Terminal A at Bostons Logan International Airport. We intend to fund the costs of design and construction of the terminal facility with the proceeds of approximately $500 million in bonds to be issued by Massport. We will guarantee the debt service on the bonds, which will be paid by Delta under a long-term lease between Delta and Massport. We expect the agreements with Massport to be finalized, and the sale of the bonds to be completed, on or about August 16, 2001. Because we will guarantee the debt service on the bonds, we are required to include the cash proceeds, as well as the related debt, in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. For additional information about this project, see Note 11 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q.
RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 141, Business Combinations and SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. SFAS 141 was effective June 30, 2001. SFAS 142 is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2001. Delta will adopt SFAS 142 on January 1, 2002. Goodwill is presented as cost in excess of net assets acquired in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
SFAS 141 requires all business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001 to be accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. It also requires that intangible assets be recognized apart from goodwill if the intangible asset arises from contractual or legal rights or if it is transferable or otherwise separable from the acquired business. We believe that adoption of SFAS 141 will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
SFAS 142 addresses financial accounting and reporting for goodwill and other intangible assets. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) currently requires that goodwill be amortized over its estimated useful life, not to exceed 40 years. SFAS 142 requires that goodwill no longer be amortized. Instead, we will be required to apply a fair market value based impairment test to our goodwill at least annually. The initial review of our goodwill, the benchmark, must be completed no later than June 30, 2002. SFAS 142 also redefines intangible assets and addresses
26
their related amortization. We are currently evaluating the impact of SFAS 142 on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
PERSONNEL MATTERS
Delta Pilot Contract
On April 22, 2001, Delta and the Air Line Pilots Association, International (ALPA), the collective bargaining representative of Deltas approximately 10,000 pilots, reached a tentative agreement on a new collective bargaining agreement to replace the existing pilot contract that became amendable on May 1, 2000. Delta pilots ratified the new agreement on June 20, 2001.
The new pilot contract will become amendable on May 1, 2005. Delta estimates that, for the period May 2, 2000 through May 1, 2005, the new agreement will increase its pilot costs by approximately $2.4 billion compared to the previous pilot contract. The new agreement provides for retroactive salary increases to May 2, 2000; Delta has accrued an amount equal to its retroactive obligation. Delta did not record any one-time charges in connection with the new contract.
Comair Pilot Contract
On June 14, 2001, Comair and ALPA, the union that represents Comairs approximately 1,300 pilots, reached a tentative agreement on a new collective bargaining agreement to replace the existing pilot contract that became amendable in June 1998. Comair pilots ratified the agreement on June 22, 2001, ending an 89-day strike. The new contract will become amendable in May 2006. Comair resumed partial service on July 2 and was operating at about 50% of its pre-strike capacity by the end of July. We expect Comair to operate at approximately 90% of pre-strike capacity by December 31, 2001.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Delta holds equity interests, including warrants and other similar rights, in certain companies, primarily priceline. Changes in the fair market value of our equity holdings could have a material impact on our earnings. For a discussion of changes in our equity interests in priceline during the June 2001 quarter, see Note 3 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q.
At June 30, 2001, the fair market value of our priceline Series B Preferred Stock was $55 million, the fair market value of our priceline 2001 Warrant was $113 million and the fair market value of our priceline Amended 1999 Warrant was $27 million (see Note 3 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q for further discussion). The fair market value of the warrants are primarily related to the price of the underlying common stock (see Equity Securities Risk on page 11 in our Annual Report for our equity risk exposure at December
27
31, 2000). A 10% decline in the price of priceline common stock would have had a $16.8 million impact on the fair market value of the warrants, which would be reflected in our non-operating earnings.
Delta is subject to price risk associated with its jet fuel purchases. We manage this risk with our fuel hedging program. At June 30, 2001, Delta held fuel hedge contracts covering 46% of our projected aircraft fuel requirements for the six months ended December 31, 2001 with an average hedge price of 55.33 cents per gallon. We do not enter into fuel hedge contracts for speculative purposes. For additional information regarding our fuel hedging program, see Note 3 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (pages 21-22) in the Annual Report.
Delta is also subject to foreign currency exchange risk because we have revenues and expenses denominated in foreign currencies primarily the Euro, the British Pound and the Japanese Yen. To manage exchange rate risk, we net foreign currency revenues and expenses to the extent practicable. From time to time, we may also enter into foreign currency options and forward contracts with maturities of up to 12 months. The estimated fair market value of our foreign currency hedging contracts was not material at June 30, 2001. We do not enter into foreign currency hedging contracts for speculative purposes.
For additional information regarding Deltas other exposures to market risks, see Market Risks Associated With Financial Instruments (pages 10-12), as well as Notes 2, 3 and 4 (pages 20-23) of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, in our Annual Report.
28
[LETTERHEAD OF ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP]REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
To Delta Air Lines, Inc.:
We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of DELTA AIR LINES, INC. (a Delaware corporation) AND SUBSIDIARIES as of June 30, 2001 and the related consolidated statements of operations for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2001 and 2000, and the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2001 and 2000. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management.
We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
-s- Arthur Andersen LLP
Atlanta, GeorgiaAugust 9, 2001
29
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 2. Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds
Under the Delta Air Lines, Inc. Directors Deferred Compensation Plan (Plan), members of our Board of Directors may defer, for a specified period, all or any part of their cash compensation earned as a director. A participating director may choose an investment return on the deferred amount from the investment return choices available under the Delta Family-Care Savings Plan, a qualified defined contribution pension plan for eligible Delta personnel. One of the investment return choices under the Delta Family-Care Savings Plan is the Delta Common Stock Fund, a fund invested primarily in Deltas common stock. During the quarter ended June 30, 2001, participants in the Plan deferred $33,612 in the Delta Common Stock Fund investment return choice, which is equivalent to 762 shares of Delta common stock at prevailing market prices. These transactions were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933 as amended, in reliance on Section 4(2) of that Act.
30
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
31
Item 5. Other Information
SkyTeam
Delta, Aeromexico, Air France, CSA Czech Airlines and Korean Airlines are members of SkyTeam, a global airline alliance that links the route networks of the member airlines and offers enhanced customer service through code sharing arrangements, reciprocal frequent flyer and lounge programs and coordinated cargo operations. On July 27, 2001, Alitalia agreed to join the SkyTeam global alliance.
Legal Proceedings
During the June 2001 quarter, Delta and the Delta Pilots Retirement Plan (Retirement Plan) were named as defendants in five purported class action lawsuits filed in federal district courts in California, Massachusetts, Ohio, New Mexico and New York. The Retirement Plan is sponsored and funded by Delta. These cases, which are substantially similar to the two pilot retirement benefits lawsuits discussed on page 14 of Deltas Form 10-K for the transition period from July 1, 2000 to December 31, 2000, (1) seek to assert claims on behalf of a class consisting of certain groups of retired and active Delta pilots; (2) allege that the calculation of the retirement benefits of the class violated the Retirement Plan and the Internal Revenue Code; and (3) seek unspecified damages. Delta intends to defend these matters vigorously.
32
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) Exhibits
12: Computation of ratio of earnings to fixed charges.
15: Letter from Arthur Andersen LLP regarding unaudited interim financial information.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
On June 15, 2001, Delta filed a Current Report on Form 8-K to file, under Item 9 Regulation FD, a letter from Delta to certain investors and analysts concerning Deltas expected financial performance for the June 2001 quarter, the then tentative pilot agreement at Comair, Inc. and the status of the ratification vote by Delta pilots on the new collective bargaining agreement.
On July 31, 2001, Delta filed a Current Report on Form 8-K reporting, under Item 5 Other Events, certain financial and labor-related information.
33
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
34