Companies:
10,651
total market cap:
$139.941 T
Sign In
๐บ๐ธ
EN
English
$ USD
โฌ
EUR
๐ช๐บ
โน
INR
๐ฎ๐ณ
ยฃ
GBP
๐ฌ๐ง
$
CAD
๐จ๐ฆ
$
AUD
๐ฆ๐บ
$
NZD
๐ณ๐ฟ
$
HKD
๐ญ๐ฐ
$
SGD
๐ธ๐ฌ
Global ranking
Ranking by countries
America
๐บ๐ธ United States
๐จ๐ฆ Canada
๐ฒ๐ฝ Mexico
๐ง๐ท Brazil
๐จ๐ฑ Chile
Europe
๐ช๐บ European Union
๐ฉ๐ช Germany
๐ฌ๐ง United Kingdom
๐ซ๐ท France
๐ช๐ธ Spain
๐ณ๐ฑ Netherlands
๐ธ๐ช Sweden
๐ฎ๐น Italy
๐จ๐ญ Switzerland
๐ต๐ฑ Poland
๐ซ๐ฎ Finland
Asia
๐จ๐ณ China
๐ฏ๐ต Japan
๐ฐ๐ท South Korea
๐ญ๐ฐ Hong Kong
๐ธ๐ฌ Singapore
๐ฎ๐ฉ Indonesia
๐ฎ๐ณ India
๐ฒ๐พ Malaysia
๐น๐ผ Taiwan
๐น๐ญ Thailand
๐ป๐ณ Vietnam
Others
๐ฆ๐บ Australia
๐ณ๐ฟ New Zealand
๐ฎ๐ฑ Israel
๐ธ๐ฆ Saudi Arabia
๐น๐ท Turkey
๐ท๐บ Russia
๐ฟ๐ฆ South Africa
>> All Countries
Ranking by categories
๐ All assets by Market Cap
๐ Automakers
โ๏ธ Airlines
๐ซ Airports
โ๏ธ Aircraft manufacturers
๐ฆ Banks
๐จ Hotels
๐ Pharmaceuticals
๐ E-Commerce
โ๏ธ Healthcare
๐ฆ Courier services
๐ฐ Media/Press
๐ท Alcoholic beverages
๐ฅค Beverages
๐ Clothing
โ๏ธ Mining
๐ Railways
๐ฆ Insurance
๐ Real estate
โ Ports
๐ผ Professional services
๐ด Food
๐ Restaurant chains
โ๐ป Software
๐ Semiconductors
๐ฌ Tobacco
๐ณ Financial services
๐ข Oil&Gas
๐ Electricity
๐งช Chemicals
๐ฐ Investment
๐ก Telecommunication
๐๏ธ Retail
๐ฅ๏ธ Internet
๐ Construction
๐ฎ Video Game
๐ป Tech
๐ฆพ AI
>> All Categories
ETFs
๐ All ETFs
๐๏ธ Bond ETFs
๏ผ Dividend ETFs
โฟ Bitcoin ETFs
โข Ethereum ETFs
๐ช Crypto Currency ETFs
๐ฅ Gold ETFs & ETCs
๐ฅ Silver ETFs & ETCs
๐ข๏ธ Oil ETFs & ETCs
๐ฝ Commodities ETFs & ETNs
๐ Emerging Markets ETFs
๐ Small-Cap ETFs
๐ Low volatility ETFs
๐ Inverse/Bear ETFs
โฌ๏ธ Leveraged ETFs
๐ Global/World ETFs
๐บ๐ธ USA ETFs
๐บ๐ธ S&P 500 ETFs
๐บ๐ธ Dow Jones ETFs
๐ช๐บ Europe ETFs
๐จ๐ณ China ETFs
๐ฏ๐ต Japan ETFs
๐ฎ๐ณ India ETFs
๐ฌ๐ง UK ETFs
๐ฉ๐ช Germany ETFs
๐ซ๐ท France ETFs
โ๏ธ Mining ETFs
โ๏ธ Gold Mining ETFs
โ๏ธ Silver Mining ETFs
๐งฌ Biotech ETFs
๐ฉโ๐ป Tech ETFs
๐ Real Estate ETFs
โ๏ธ Healthcare ETFs
โก Energy ETFs
๐ Renewable Energy ETFs
๐ก๏ธ Insurance ETFs
๐ฐ Water ETFs
๐ด Food & Beverage ETFs
๐ฑ Socially Responsible ETFs
๐ฃ๏ธ Infrastructure ETFs
๐ก Innovation ETFs
๐ Semiconductors ETFs
๐ Aerospace & Defense ETFs
๐ Cybersecurity ETFs
๐ฆพ Artificial Intelligence ETFs
Watchlist
Account
Delta Air Lines
DAL
#565
Rank
$43.02 B
Marketcap
๐บ๐ธ
United States
Country
$65.89
Share price
-0.98%
Change (1 day)
-3.05%
Change (1 year)
โ๏ธ Airlines
๐ด Travel
๐ Transportation
Categories
Market cap
Revenue
Earnings
Price history
P/E ratio
P/S ratio
More
Price history
P/E ratio
P/S ratio
P/B ratio
Operating margin
EPS
Dividends
Dividend yield
Shares outstanding
Fails to deliver
Cost to borrow
Total assets
Total liabilities
Total debt
Cash on Hand
Net Assets
Annual Reports (10-K)
Delta Air Lines
Quarterly Reports (10-Q)
Financial Year FY2012 Q2
Delta Air Lines - 10-Q quarterly report FY2012 Q2
Text size:
Small
Medium
Large
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
R
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended
June 30, 2012
Or
o
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission File Number 001-5424
DELTA AIR LINES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
State of Incorporation: Delaware
I.R.S. Employer Identification No.: 58-0218548
Post Office Box 20706, Atlanta, Georgia 30320-6001
Telephone: (404) 715-2600
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes
R
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes
R
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer
R
Accelerated filer
o
Non-accelerated filer
o
Smaller reporting company
o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes
o
No
R
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.
Yes
R
No
o
Number of shares outstanding by each class of common stock, as of
June 30, 2012
:
Common Stock, $
0.0001
par value -
850,311,450
shares outstanding
This document is also available through our website at http://www.delta.com/about_delta/investor_relations.
Table of Contents
Page
Forward Looking Statements
1
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
2
Consolidated Balance Sheets
2
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss)
3
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
4
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
5
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
14
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
28
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
28
Part II. Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
30
Item 1A. Risk Factors
30
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
31
Item 6. Exhibits
31
Signature
32
Unless otherwise indicated, the terms “Delta,” “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to Delta Air Lines, Inc. and its subsidiaries.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Statements in this Form 10-Q (or otherwise made by us or on our behalf) that are not historical facts, including statements about our estimates, expectations, beliefs, intentions, projections or strategies for the future, may be “forward-looking statements” as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from historical experience or our present expectations. Known material risk factors applicable to Delta are described in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2011
(“Form 10-K”) and in "Part II, Item 1A. Risk Factors" in this Form 10-Q, other than risks that could apply to any issuer or offering. All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date made, and we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that may arise after the date of this report.
1
DELTA AIR LINES, INC.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Unaudited)
(in millions, except share data)
June 30,
2012
December 31,
2011
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
$
2,539
$
2,657
Short-term investments
959
958
Restricted cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments
368
305
Accounts receivable, net of an allowance for uncollectible accounts of $37 and $33
at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively
1,828
1,563
Expendable parts and supplies inventories, net of an allowance for obsolescence of $112 and $101
at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively
393
367
Deferred income taxes, net
488
461
Prepaid expenses and other
1,882
1,418
Total current assets
8,457
7,729
Property and Equipment, Net:
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization of $6,141 and $5,472
at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively
20,609
20,223
Other Assets:
Goodwill
9,794
9,794
Identifiable intangibles, net of accumulated amortization of $634 and $600
at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively
4,716
4,751
Other noncurrent assets
1,144
1,002
Total other assets
15,654
15,547
Total assets
$
44,720
$
43,499
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
Current Liabilities:
Current maturities of long-term debt and capital leases
$
1,779
$
1,944
Air traffic liability
5,006
3,480
Accounts payable
2,175
1,600
Frequent flyer deferred revenue
1,665
1,849
Accrued salaries and related benefits
1,229
1,367
Taxes payable
722
594
Fuel card obligation
476
318
Other accrued liabilities
1,641
1,549
Total current liabilities
14,693
12,701
Noncurrent Liabilities:
Long-term debt and capital leases
11,221
11,847
Pension, postretirement and related benefits
13,613
14,200
Frequent flyer deferred revenue
2,651
2,700
Deferred income taxes, net
2,071
2,028
Other noncurrent liabilities
1,606
1,419
Total noncurrent liabilities
31,162
32,194
Commitments and Contingencies
Stockholders' Deficit:
Common stock at $0.0001 par value; 1,500,000,000 shares authorized, 866,728,208 and 861,499,734
shares issued at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively
—
—
Additional paid-in capital
14,031
13,999
Accumulated deficit
(8,442
)
(8,398
)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
(6,490
)
(6,766
)
Treasury stock, at cost, 16,416,758 and 16,253,791 shares at June 30, 2012 and
December 31, 2011, respectively
(234
)
(231
)
Total stockholders' deficit
(1,135
)
(1,396
)
Total liabilities and stockholders' deficit
$
44,720
$
43,499
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
2
DELTA AIR LINES, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended June 30,
Six Months Ended June 30,
(in millions, except per share data)
2012
2011
2012
2011
Operating Revenue:
Passenger:
Mainline
$
6,644
$
6,204
$
12,306
$
11,334
Regional carriers
1,807
1,687
3,371
3,132
Total passenger revenue
8,451
7,891
15,677
14,466
Cargo
262
264
506
514
Other
1,019
998
1,962
1,920
Total operating revenue
9,732
9,153
18,145
16,900
Operating Expense:
Aircraft fuel and related taxes
3,305
2,663
5,538
4,829
Salaries and related costs
1,825
1,739
3,588
3,466
Contract carrier arrangements
1,416
1,410
2,791
2,710
Aircraft maintenance materials and outside repairs
548
485
1,109
970
Depreciation and amortization
388
381
774
757
Passenger commissions and other selling expenses
393
440
773
809
Contracted services
397
415
775
840
Landing fees and other rents
347
320
652
633
Passenger service
187
181
358
345
Aircraft rent
68
74
143
152
Profit sharing
135
8
135
8
Restructuring and other items
193
144
181
151
Other
396
412
812
841
Total operating expense
9,598
8,672
17,629
16,511
Operating Income
134
481
516
389
Other (Expense) Income:
Interest expense, net
(207
)
(233
)
(428
)
(454
)
Amortization of debt discount, net
(49
)
(46
)
(100
)
(93
)
Loss on extinguishment of debt
—
(13
)
—
(33
)
Miscellaneous, net
(42
)
6
(25
)
(4
)
Total other expense, net
(298
)
(286
)
(553
)
(584
)
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes
(164
)
195
(37
)
(195
)
Income Tax (Provision) Benefit
(4
)
3
(7
)
75
Net Income (Loss)
$
(168
)
$
198
$
(44
)
$
(120
)
Basic Earnings (Loss) per Share
$
(0.20
)
$
0.24
$
(0.05
)
$
(0.14
)
Diluted Earnings (Loss) per Share
$
(0.20
)
$
0.23
$
(0.05
)
$
(0.14
)
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
$
(140
)
$
8
$
232
$
(135
)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
DELTA AIR LINES, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
Six Months Ended June 30,
(in millions)
2012
2011
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
$
1,463
$
1,774
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:
Property and equipment additions:
Flight equipment, including advance payments
(609
)
(481
)
Ground property and equipment, including technology
(395
)
(172
)
Purchase of investments
(479
)
(479
)
Redemption of investments
514
250
Other, net
(32
)
8
Net cash used in investing activities
(1,001
)
(874
)
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:
Payments on long-term debt and capital lease obligations
(741
)
(2,394
)
Proceeds from long-term obligations
—
1,599
Debt issuance costs
—
(58
)
Restricted cash and cash equivalents
—
(84
)
Fuel card obligation, net
158
—
Other, net
3
—
Net cash used in financing activities
(580
)
(937
)
Net Decrease in Cash and Cash Equivalents
(118
)
(37
)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
2,657
2,892
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$
2,539
$
2,855
Non-cash transactions:
SkyMiles used pursuant to advance purchase under American Express Agreements
$
(167
)
$
—
JFK redevelopment project funded by third parties
154
43
Flight equipment under capital leases
—
89
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
DELTA AIR LINES, INC.
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2012
(Unaudited)
NOTE 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Delta Air Lines, Inc. and our wholly-owned subsidiaries. These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) for interim financial information. Consistent with these requirements, this Form 10-Q does not include all the information required by GAAP for complete financial statements. As a result, this Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying Notes in our Form 10-K.
Management believes the accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements reflect all adjustments, including normal recurring items and restructuring and other items, considered necessary for a fair statement of results for the interim periods presented.
Due to seasonal variations in the demand for air travel, the volatility of aircraft fuel prices, changes in global economic conditions and other factors, operating results for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2012
are not necessarily indicative of operating results for the entire year.
Recent Accounting Standards
In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued "Presentation of Comprehensive Income." The standard revises the presentation and prominence of the items reported in other comprehensive income and is effective retrospectively for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. We adopted this standard in the March 2012 quarter and have presented comprehensive income (loss) on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss).
NOTE 2. OIL REFINERY ACQUISITION
On
June 22, 2012
(the "Closing Date"), our wholly-owned subsidiary, Monroe Energy, LLC (“Monroe”), acquired an oil refinery located near Philadelphia, Pennsylvania from Phillips 66. Monroe invested
$180 million
to acquire the refinery and is expected to receive a
$30 million
grant from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and Delaware County that will be used to offset the purchase price of the acquisition.
The acquisition includes pipelines and transportation assets that will allow Monroe to supply jet fuel to Delta's operations throughout the Northeast, including our New York hubs at LaGuardia Airport ("LaGuardia") and John F. Kennedy International Airport ("JFK").
Monroe has entered into strategic agreements with BP and Phillips 66.
Under a three-year agreement, BP will supply crude oil to be refined at the facility.
Monroe will spend approximately
$100 million
to convert the facility to maximize jet fuel production and will sell the jet fuel produced to Delta for use in its operations in the Northeast.
In addition to jet fuel, the refining process will produce gas, diesel fuel, and other refined products ("non-jet fuel products").
Monroe will exchange these non-jet fuel products for jet fuel from Phillips 66 and BP to be used in Delta's operations throughout the U.S.
Jet fuel costs have continued to increase in recent years, making fuel expense our single largest expense.
Because global demand for jet fuel and related products is increasing at the same time that jet fuel refining capacity is decreasing in the U.S. (particularly in the Northeast), the refinery mark-up or margin reflected in the prices we pay for jet fuel has increased.
Our ability to acquire jet fuel from Monroe and the strategic agreements with BP and Phillips 66 are expected to reduce our fuel costs.
We accounted for the refinery acquisition as a business combination. The refinery, pipeline, and transportation assets acquired were recorded in property, plant, and equipment at
$180 million
based on our initial estimate of their respective fair values on the Closing Date. In connection with the closing, we also purchased
$50 million
of inventory, primarily crude oil, that was at the refinery on the Closing Date, which was recorded in prepaid expenses and other.
5
NOTE 3. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Assets (Liabilities) Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
(in millions)
June 30,
2012
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Cash equivalents
$
2,243
$
2,243
$
—
$
—
Short-term investments
959
959
—
—
Restricted cash equivalents and investments
382
382
—
—
Long-term investments
196
83
24
89
Hedge derivatives, net
Fuel hedge contracts
(253
)
28
(281
)
—
Interest rate contracts
(78
)
—
(78
)
—
Foreign currency exchange contracts
(6
)
—
(6
)
—
(in millions)
December 31, 2011
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Cash equivalents
$
2,357
$
2,357
$
—
$
—
Short-term investments
958
958
—
—
Restricted cash equivalents and investments
341
341
—
—
Long-term investments
188
55
24
109
Hedge derivatives, net
Fuel hedge contracts
70
—
70
—
Interest rate contracts
(91
)
—
(91
)
—
Foreign currency exchange contracts
(89
)
—
(89
)
—
Cash Equivalents, Short-term Investments and Restricted Cash Equivalents and Investments.
Cash equivalents and short-term investments generally consist of money market funds and treasury bills. Restricted cash equivalents and investments are primarily held to meet certain projected self-insurance obligations and generally consist of money market funds and time deposits. These investments
are recorded at cost, which approximates fair value. Fair value is based on the market approach using prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets.
Long-term Investments.
Our long-term investments are classified in other noncurrent assets and comprised of equity investments in GOL and Aeroméxico, auction rate securities and other long-term investments.
Hedge Derivatives.
Our derivative contracts are generally negotiated with counterparties without going through a public exchange. Accordingly, our fair value assessments give consideration to the risk of counterparty default (as well as our own credit risk).
•
Fuel Derivatives.
Our fuel hedge portfolio consists of call options; put options; combinations of two or more call options and put options; swap contracts; and futures contracts.
The products underlying the hedge contracts include heating oil, crude oil, jet fuel and diesel fuel, as these commodities are highly correlated with the price of jet fuel that we consume.
Option contracts are valued under the income approach using option pricing models based on data either readily observable in public markets, derived from public markets or provided by counterparties who regularly trade in public markets. Volatilities used in these valuations ranged from
14% to 44%
depending on the maturity dates, underlying commodities and strike prices of the option contracts. Swap contracts are valued under the income approach using a discounted cash flow model based on data either readily observable or derived from public markets. Discount rates used in these valuations vary with the maturity dates of the respective contracts and are based on LIBOR. Futures contracts and options on futures contracts are traded on a public exchange and are valued based on quoted market prices.
•
Interest Rate Derivatives.
Our interest rate derivatives consist of swap contracts and are valued primarily based on data readily observable in public markets.
6
•
Foreign Currency Derivatives.
Our foreign currency derivatives consist of Japanese yen and Canadian dollar forward contracts and are valued based on data readily observable in public markets.
NOTE 4. DERIVATIVES
Our results of operations are impacted by changes in aircraft fuel prices, interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. In an effort to manage our exposure to these risks, we enter into derivative contracts and adjust our derivative portfolio as market conditions change.
Aircraft Fuel Price Risk
Our results of operations are materially impacted by changes in aircraft fuel prices.
We actively manage our fuel price risk through a hedging program intended to generate a positive cash position to defray the cost of jet fuel purchases during upward fuel price movements, while preserving participation in downward price movements of jet fuel to the extent practical.
This fuel hedging program utilizes several different contract and commodity types, which are intended to create a risk mitigating hedge portfolio.
The economic effectiveness of this hedge portfolio is frequently tested against our financial targets.
The hedge portfolio is rebalanced from time to time according to market conditions, which may result in locking in gains or losses on hedge contracts prior to their settlement dates.
Effective June 2011, we stopped designating substantially all of our new fuel derivative contracts as accounting hedges and discontinued hedge accounting for our then existing fuel derivative contracts that previously had been designated as accounting hedges. As a result, we record market adjustments for changes in fair value to earnings in aircraft fuel and related taxes. Prior to this change in accounting designation, gains or losses on these contracts were deferred in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) ("AOCI") until contract settlement.
We anticipate that all amounts relating to our fuel derivative contracts in AOCI will be recognized by the end of 2012.
The following table shows the impact of fuel hedge gains (losses) for both designated and undesignated contracts on aircraft fuel and related taxes:
Three Months Ended June 30,
Six Months Ended June 30,
(in millions)
2012
2011
2012
2011
Market adjustments for changes in fair value
$
(718
)
$
33
$
(535
)
$
80
Effective portion reclassified from AOCI to earnings
2
74
15
134
(Loss) gain recorded in aircraft fuel and related taxes
$
(716
)
$
107
$
(520
)
$
214
As a result of the significant decline in fuel prices during the
June 2012
quarter, we recorded losses of
$718 million
due to changes in the fair value of our fuel hedge portfolio. The majority of these losses relate to mark-to-market adjustments for fuel hedges settling in future periods.
These adjustments are based on market prices as of the end of the reporting period and assumptions described in Note 3.
The following tables reflect the estimated fair value asset (liability) positions, notional balances and maturity dates of our hedge contracts:
Hedge Position as of
June 30, 2012
(in millions)
Notional Balance
Final Maturity Date
Prepaid Expenses and Other
Other Noncurrent Assets
Other Accrued Liabilities
Other Noncurrent Liabilities
Hedge Derivatives, net
Designated as hedges
Interest rate contracts (cash flow hedges)
$
906
U.S. dollars
May 2019
$
—
$
—
$
(26
)
$
(55
)
$
(81
)
Interest rate contracts (fair value hedges)
$
485
U.S. dollars
August 2022
—
5
(2
)
—
3
Foreign currency exchange contracts
102,599
Japanese yen
November 2014
8
7
(17
)
(4
)
(6
)
312
Canadian dollars
Not designated as hedges
Fuel hedge contracts
2,682
gallons - heating oil, crude oil, jet fuel and diesel
December 2013
541
125
(839
)
(80
)
(253
)
Total derivative contracts
$
549
$
137
$
(884
)
$
(139
)
$
(337
)
7
Hedge Position as of
December 31, 2011
(in millions)
Notional Balance
Final Maturity Date
Prepaid Expenses and Other
Other Noncurrent Assets
Other Accrued Liabilities
Other Noncurrent Liabilities
Hedge Derivatives, net
Designated as hedges
Interest rate contracts (cash flow hedges)
$
989
U.S. dollars
May 2019
$
—
$
—
$
(27
)
$
(57
)
$
(84
)
Interest rate contracts (fair value hedges)
$
500
U.S. dollars
August 2022
—
—
—
(7
)
(7
)
Foreign currency exchange contracts
126,993
Japanese yen
April 2014
7
5
(58
)
(43
)
(89
)
313
Canadian dollars
Not designated as hedges
Fuel hedge contracts
1,225
gallons - heating oil, crude oil, jet fuel and diesel
December 2012
570
—
(500
)
—
70
Total derivative contracts
$
577
$
5
$
(585
)
$
(107
)
$
(110
)
Hedge Gains (Losses)
Gains (losses) related to our designated hedge contracts, including those previously designated as accounting hedges, are as follows:
Effective Portion Reclassified from AOCI to Earnings
Effective Portion Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss)
(in millions)
2012
2011
2012
2011
Three Months Ended June 30
Fuel hedge contracts
$
2
$
74
$
(2
)
$
(154
)
Interest rate contracts
—
—
(3
)
(11
)
Foreign currency exchange contracts
—
(11
)
(40
)
(33
)
Total designated
$
2
$
63
$
(45
)
$
(198
)
Six Months Ended June 30
Fuel hedge contracts
$
15
$
134
$
(15
)
$
(66
)
Interest rate contracts
—
—
3
7
Foreign currency exchange contracts
(13
)
(22
)
83
26
Total designated
$
2
$
112
$
71
$
(33
)
Credit Risk
To manage credit risk associated with our aircraft fuel price, interest rate and foreign currency hedging programs, we select counterparties based on their credit ratings and limit our exposure to any one counterparty.
Our hedge contracts contain margin funding requirements.
The margin funding requirements may cause us to post margin to counterparties or may cause counterparties to post margin to us as market prices in the underlying hedged items change.
Due to the fair value position of our hedge contracts, we posted margin of
$350 million
and
$30 million
as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. These amounts are recorded in prepaid expenses and other.
8
NOTE 5. LONG-TERM DEBT
Fair Value of Debt
Market risk associated with our fixed and variable rate long-term debt relates to the potential reduction in fair value and negative impact to future earnings, respectively, from an increase in interest rates. In the table below, the aggregate fair value of debt was based primarily on reported market values, recently completed market transactions and estimates based on interest rates, maturities, credit risk and underlying collateral and is classified primarily as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy.
(in millions)
June 30,
2012
December 31,
2011
Total debt at par value
$
12,944
$
13,797
Unamortized discount, net
(625
)
(737
)
Net carrying amount
$
12,319
$
13,060
Fair value
$
13,100
$
13,600
Certificates
In July 2012, we completed a
$480 million
offering of Pass Through Certificates, Series 2012-1 ("2012-1 EETC") through a pass through trust. We plan to use the proceeds (currently held in escrow) primarily to refinance aircraft securing the Delta 2002-1 EETC, which matured on
July 2, 2012
, and the Northwest 2001-2 EETC, which is scheduled to mature in
August 2013
and is expected to be prepaid in the September 2012 quarter. The details of the offering are shown in the table below:
(in millions)
Total Principal
Fixed Interest Rate
Offering Completion Date
Final Maturity Date
Collateral
2012-1A
$
354
4.750%
July 2012
May 2020
31 aircraft
2012-1B
126
6.875%
July 2012
May 2019
31 aircraft
(1)
$
480
(1)
The B tranche is secured by the same aircraft that secure the A tranche.
Covenants
We were in compliance with all covenants in our financing agreements at June 30, 2012.
NOTE 6. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Aircraft Commitments
Future aircraft purchase commitments at
June 30, 2012
total approximately
$6.8 billion
and include
100
B-737-900ER aircraft,
18
B-787-8 aircraft and
11
previously owned MD-90 aircraft. We have obtained committed long-term financing for a substantial portion of the purchase price of these aircraft.
In July 2012, we finalized an agreement with Southwest Airlines and The Boeing Company to add
88
B-717-200 aircraft with deliveries beginning in
2013 and continuing through 2015
.
Legal Contingencies
We are involved in various legal proceedings related to employment practices, environmental issues, antitrust matters and other matters concerning our business. We record liabilities for losses from legal proceedings when we determine that it is probable that the outcome in a legal proceeding will be unfavorable and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. We cannot reasonably estimate the potential loss for certain legal proceedings because, for example, the litigation is in its early stages or the plaintiff does not specify the damages being sought. Although the outcome of the legal proceedings in which we are involved cannot be predicted with certainty, management believes that the resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
9
Other Contingencies
General Indemnifications
We are the lessee under many commercial real estate leases. It is common in these transactions for us, as the lessee, to agree to indemnify the lessor and the lessor's related parties for tort, environmental and other liabilities that arise out of or relate to our use or occupancy of the leased premises. This type of indemnity would typically make us responsible to indemnified parties for liabilities arising out of the conduct of, among others, contractors, licensees and invitees at, or in connection with, the use or occupancy of the leased premises. This indemnity often extends to related liabilities arising from the negligence of the indemnified parties, but usually excludes any liabilities caused by either their sole or gross negligence or their willful misconduct.
Our aircraft and other equipment lease and financing agreements typically contain provisions requiring us, as the lessee or obligor, to indemnify the other parties to those agreements, including certain of those parties' related persons, against virtually any liabilities that might arise from the use or operation of the aircraft or such other equipment.
We believe that our insurance would cover most of our exposure to liabilities and related indemnities associated with the commercial real estate leases and aircraft and other equipment lease and financing agreements described above. While our insurance does not typically cover environmental liabilities, we have certain insurance policies in place as required by applicable environmental laws.
Certain of our aircraft and other financing transactions include provisions that require us to make payments to preserve an expected economic return to the lenders if that economic return is diminished due to certain changes in law or regulations. In certain of these financing transactions, we also bear the risk of certain changes in tax laws that would subject payments to non-U.S. lenders to withholding taxes.
We cannot reasonably estimate our potential future payments under the indemnities and related provisions described above because we cannot predict (1) when and under what circumstances these provisions may be triggered and (2) the amount that would be payable if the provisions were triggered because the amounts would be based on facts and circumstances existing at such time.
Employees Under Collective Bargaining Agreements
At
June 30, 2012
, we had approximately
80,600
full-time equivalent employees. Approximately
15%
of these employees were represented by unions.
During the June 2012 quarter, we reached an agreement with the Air Line Pilots Association, International (“ALPA”) to modify the existing collective bargaining agreement, which covers approximately
10,700
Delta pilots. The agreement, which was ratified by the pilots in June 2012 and took effect on
July 1, 2012
, becomes amendable on
December 31, 2015
.
War-Risk Insurance Contingency
As a result of the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, aviation insurers significantly (1) reduced the maximum amount of insurance coverage available to commercial air carriers for liability to persons (other than employees or passengers) for claims from acts of terrorism, war or similar events and (2) increased the premiums for such coverage and for aviation insurance in general. Since September 24, 2001, the U.S. government has been providing U.S. airlines with war-risk insurance to cover losses, including those resulting from terrorism, to passengers, third parties (ground damage) and the aircraft hull. The U.S. Secretary of Transportation has extended coverage through September 30, 2013, and we expect the coverage to be further extended. The withdrawal of government support of airline war-risk insurance would require us to obtain war-risk insurance coverage commercially, if available. Such commercial insurance could have substantially less desirable coverage than currently provided by the U.S. government, may not be adequate to protect our risk of loss from future acts of terrorism, may result in a material increase to our operating expense or may not be obtainable at all, resulting in an interruption to our operations.
Other
We have certain contracts for goods and services that require us to pay a penalty, acquire inventory specific to us or purchase equipment specific to a contract, if we terminate this type of contract without cause prior to its expiration date. Because these obligations are contingent on our termination of a contract without cause prior to its expiration date, no obligation would exist unless such a termination occurs.
10
NOTE 7. RESTRUCTURING AND OTHER ITEMS
The following table shows amounts recorded in restructuring and other items on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss):
Three Months Ended June 30,
Six Months Ended June 30,
(in millions)
2012
2011
2012
2011
Severance and related costs
$
171
$
80
$
171
$
80
Facilities, fleet and other
22
64
49
71
Gain on slot exchange
—
—
(39
)
—
Total restructuring and other items
$
193
$
144
$
181
$
151
Severance and Related Costs.
During the March 2012 quarter, we announced voluntary workforce reduction programs primarily for eligible U.S. non-pilot employees. Approximately
2,000
employees enrolled in these programs in the June 2012 quarter and became eligible for retiree healthcare benefits. As a result, we recorded a
$171 million
charge for severance and related retiree healthcare costs, including
$104 million
of special termination benefits (see Note 8).
The following table shows the balances and activity for restructuring charges:
(in millions)
Severance and Related Costs
Lease Restructuring
Balance as of December 31, 2011
$
46
$
64
Additional costs and expenses
67
3
Payments
(28
)
(6
)
Balance as of June 30, 2012
$
85
$
61
Gain on Slot Exchange.
During December 2011, we closed transactions with US Airways where we received takeoff and landing rights (each a "slot pair") at LaGuardia in exchange for slot pairs at Reagan National.
In approving these transactions, the Department of Transportation restricted our use of the exchanged slots. We recorded a
$78 million
deferred gain in December 2011. We recognized
$39 million
of this deferred gain in the March 2012 quarter as half of the restrictions lapsed and will recognize the remainder of the deferred gain in the September 2012 quarter as the remaining restrictions lapsed on July 11, 2012.
11
NOTE 8. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
The following table shows the components of net periodic cost:
Pension Benefits
Other Postretirement and
Postemployment Benefits
(in millions)
2012
2011
2012
2011
Three Months Ended June 30
Service cost
$
—
$
—
$
14
$
13
Interest cost
232
242
41
45
Expected return on plan assets
(176
)
(181
)
(19
)
(22
)
Amortization of prior service benefit
—
—
(6
)
(1
)
Recognized net actuarial loss (gain)
36
14
6
(3
)
Special termination benefits
—
—
104
—
Net periodic cost
$
92
$
75
$
140
$
32
Six Months Ended June 30
Service cost
$
—
$
—
$
29
$
26
Interest cost
464
484
82
90
Expected return on plan assets
(352
)
(362
)
(38
)
(45
)
Amortization of prior service benefit
—
—
(9
)
(1
)
Recognized net actuarial loss (gain)
72
28
12
(6
)
Special termination benefits
—
—
104
—
Net periodic cost
$
184
$
150
$
180
$
64
During the six months ended June 30, 2012, we remeasured our postretirement healthcare obligation to account for changes to retiree medical benefits resulting from the final integration of wages and benefits following our merger with Northwest Airlines and the voluntary workforce reduction programs offered to eligible employees. As a result, we recorded
$104 million
of special termination benefits in restructuring and other items (see Note 7).
NOTE 9. INCOME TAXES
Valuation Allowance
We periodically assess whether it is more likely than not that we will generate sufficient taxable income to realize our deferred income tax assets. We establish valuation allowances if it is not likely we will realize our deferred income tax assets. In making this determination, we consider all available positive and negative evidence and make certain assumptions. We consider, among other things, our deferred tax liabilities, the overall business environment, our historical financial results, our industry's historically cyclical financial results and potential current and future tax planning strategies.
We recorded a full valuation allowance in 2004 due to our cumulative three year loss position at that time, compounded by the negative industry-wide business trends and outlook. At
June 30, 2012
, we had a
$10.6 billion
valuation allowance established against our deferred income tax assets, which represents a full valuation allowance against our net deferred income tax asset.
During the March 2012 quarter, we moved from a cumulative loss position over the previous three years to a cumulative income position for the first time since we established the full valuation allowance. We concluded that the valuation allowance was still needed on our net deferred tax assets based upon the weight of the factors described above. If our cumulative income position continues to increase and our future projections indicate sustained profitability, we will evaluate whether this profitability trend constitutes sufficient positive evidence to support a reversal of our valuation allowance (in full or in part).
12
Income Tax Allocation
We consider all income sources, including other comprehensive income, in determining the amount of tax benefit allocated to continuing operations (the "Income Tax Allocation"). During 2009, as a result of the Income Tax Allocation, we recorded a non-cash deferred income tax expense of
$321 million
on other comprehensive income as a result of hedge gains on fuel derivatives and an offsetting non-cash income tax expense of
$321 million
. This deferred income tax expense will remain in AOCI until all amounts in AOCI that relate to fuel derivatives which are designated as accounting hedges are recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.
We anticipate that all amounts relating to our fuel derivative contracts in AOCI will be recognized by the end of 2012.
As a result, a non-cash income tax expense of
$321 million
will be recognized in the December 2012 quarter unless we enter into and designate additional fuel derivative contracts as accounting hedges prior to the settlement date of the outstanding contracts.
NOTE 10. EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
We calculate basic earnings (loss) per share by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Shares issuable upon the satisfaction of certain conditions are considered outstanding and included in the computation of basic earnings (loss) per share. The following table shows the computation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share:
Three Months Ended June 30,
Six Months Ended June 30,
(in millions, except per share data)
2012
2011
2012
2011
Net income (loss)
$
(168
)
$
198
$
(44
)
$
(120
)
Basic weighted average shares outstanding
845
838
844
838
Dilutive effect of share based awards
—
6
—
—
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding
845
844
844
838
Basic earnings (loss) per share
$
(0.20
)
$
0.24
$
(0.05
)
$
(0.14
)
Diluted earnings (loss) per share
$
(0.20
)
$
0.23
$
(0.05
)
$
(0.14
)
Antidilutive common stock equivalents excluded from diluted earnings (loss) per share
23
25
23
31
13
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
June 2012
Quarter Financial Highlights
Our net loss for the June 2012 quarter was
$168 million
, or
$0.20
per diluted share. Total operating revenue increased
$579 million
, or
6%
, over the June 2011 quarter, primarily due to higher passenger revenue. This increase in revenue was offset by higher fuel expense, which includes market losses for fuel hedge contracts primarily settling in future periods, and a charge for severance and related retiree healthcare costs.
Passenger revenue increased
$560 million
due to a
7%
year over year improvement in passenger mile yield on flat traffic, while capacity declined
1%
. Passenger revenue per available seat mile ("PRASM") increased
8%
over the June 2011 quarter, reflecting fare increases and higher revenue under corporate travel contracts.
Total operating expense increased
$926 million
over the June 2011 quarter, driven primarily by higher fuel expense. Our fuel expense increased
$618 million
(including our contract carriers under capacity purchase agreements) compared to the June 2011 quarter despite declines in market fuel prices and a
2%
decrease in consumption. As a result of the significant decline in fuel prices during the
June 2012
quarter, we recorded losses of
$716 million
due to changes in the fair value of our fuel hedge portfolio. The majority of these losses relate to mark-to-market adjustments for fuel hedges settling in future periods.
Excluding mark-to-market adjustments recorded in periods other than the settlement period ("MTM adjustments"), our average fuel price for the quarter was
$3.37
per gallon, compared to
$3.22
per gallon for the June 2011 quarter. Operating expense excluding fuel increased $308 million over the June 2011 quarter, driven by increases in wages and benefits and maintenance costs. Additionally, during the June 2012 quarter, we recorded a
$171 million
charge for severance and related retiree healthcare costs. Our consolidated operating cost per available seat mile ("CASM") for the June 2012 quarter increased 12.1% to
16.16 cent
s from
14.42 cent
s in the June 2011 quarter, primarily reflecting the market loss on fuel hedges and a
1%
decline in capacity. For the June 2012 quarter, CASM-Ex was
8.77 cent
s, or
3.6%
higher than the June 2011 quarter. The non-GAAP financial measures used in this paragraph are defined in "Supplemental Information" below.
During the June 2012 quarter, we reduced our total debt and capital leases by $376 million and ended the quarter with
$5.3 billion
in unrestricted liquidity, consisting of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments and availability under credit facilities.
Oil Refinery Acquisition
On June 22, 2012, our wholly-owned subsidiary, Monroe Energy, LLC (“Monroe”), acquired an oil refinery located near Philadelphia, Pennsylvania from Phillips 66. Monroe invested
$180 million
to acquire the refinery and is expected to receive a
$30 million
grant from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and Delaware County that will be used to offset the purchase price of the acquisition.
The acquisition includes pipelines and transportation assets that will allow Monroe to supply jet fuel to Delta's operations throughout the Northeast, including our New York hubs at LaGuardia Airport ("LaGuardia") and John F. Kennedy International Airport ("JFK").
Monroe has entered into strategic agreements with BP and Phillips 66.
Under a three-year agreement, BP will supply crude oil to be refined at the facility.
Monroe will spend approximately
$100 million
to convert the facility to maximize jet fuel production and will sell the jet fuel produced to Delta for use in its operations in the Northeast.
In addition to jet fuel, the refining process will produce gas, diesel fuel, and other refined products ("non-jet fuel products").
Monroe will exchange these non-jet fuel products for jet fuel from Phillips 66 and BP to be used in Delta's operations throughout the U.S.
We expect that our modifications to maximize jet fuel production will be completed this year and we will begin producing jet fuel in the fall.
14
Jet fuel costs have continued to increase in recent years, making fuel expense our single largest expense.
Because global demand for jet fuel and related products is increasing at the same time that jet fuel refining capacity is decreasing in the U.S. (particularly in the Northeast), the refinery mark-up or margin reflected in the prices we pay for jet fuel has increased.
Our ability to acquire jet fuel from Monroe and the strategic agreements with BP and Phillips 66 are expected to reduce our fuel costs.
Pilot Agreement
During the
June 2012
quarter, we reached an agreement with the Air Line Pilots Association, International (“ALPA”) to modify the existing collective bargaining agreement covering Delta’s pilots. The agreement, which was ratified by the pilots in June 2012, provides career growth opportunities as well as pay and benefits improvements for our pilots including increases to base pay and changes to our profit sharing program. The agreement will also provide Delta with productivity gains and support our domestic fleet restructuring.
Domestic Fleet Restructuring
Our domestic fleet restructuring will focus on lowering unit costs while investing in our fleet to enhance the customer experience. As part of this effort, in July 2012, we finalized an agreement with Southwest Airlines and The Boeing Company ("Boeing") to add 88 B-717-200 aircraft to our fleet. Delivery of the aircraft will begin next year, with 16 scheduled to enter our fleet in 2013. We will receive 36 aircraft deliveries in each of 2014 and 2015. The B-717-200 aircraft will primarily replace small 50-seat regional jets on a capacity neutral basis. These 110-seat aircraft will feature new, fully upgraded interiors, with 12 First Class seats, 15 Economy Comfort seats and in-flight WiFi throughout the aircraft.
During 2011, we entered into an agreement with Boeing to purchase 100 new fuel efficient B-737-900ER aircraft. We will add these aircraft to our fleet between 2013 and 2018, primarily replacing older B-757 and B-767 aircraft. The state-of-the-art B-737-900ER will offer an industry leading customer experience, including expanded carry-on baggage space and a roomier cabin. Additionally, we continue to upgrade our fleet with the addition of previously owned MD-90 jets, retiring less efficient aircraft.
We continue to assess our fleet and expect to add the aircraft discussed above on a capacity neutral basis, as we retire older less efficient aircraft. We will evaluate older, retiring fleets and related equipment for changes in depreciable life and/or impairment. As a
result of adding the B-717-200 aircraft, we estimate that our total lease payments, including both capital and operating leases, will be approximately $1.6 billion in 2013, $1.6 billion in 2014, $1.5 billion in 2015, $1.4 billion in 2016 and $8.8 billion after 2016.
New York Strategy
Strengthening our position in New York City continues to be an important part of our network strategy. As discussed below, key components of this strategy are operating a domestic hub at LaGuardia and creating a state-of-the-art facility at JFK. In May 2012, we announced new and expanded service to 10 popular leisure destinations (in addition to the service expansion discussed below) in the Caribbean, Bermuda, and Florida from LaGuardia and JFK. These flights are expected to begin operating in late 2012 and 2013.
LaGuardia.
During December 2011, we closed transactions with US Airways where we received takeoff and landing rights (each a "slot pair") at LaGuardia in exchange for slot pairs at Reagan National.
This exchange allows us to operate a new domestic hub at LaGuardia.
We have increased service at LaGuardia by 60% from the prior year's summer schedule, adding 100 new flights and a total of 26 new destinations. The first phase of new flights began on March 25 and the second phase commenced on July 11. We currently operate about 260 daily flights between LaGuardia and 60 cities, which is more than any other airline. Our expanded schedule adds nonstop service to top U.S. business markets and additional frequencies to business markets currently served.
In addition, we are investing $160 million in a renovation and expansion project at LaGuardia to enhance the customer experience. In April 2012, we broke ground on the project, which includes a connector linking Terminals C and D, a new SkyClub in Terminal C and expanded security lanes in both terminals.
15
JFK.
While our expanded LaGuardia schedule is focused on providing industry-leading domestic service, we are optimizing our international and trans-continental flight schedule at JFK during 2012 to facilitate convenient connections for our passengers and improve coordination with our SkyTeam alliance partners.
At JFK, we currently operate domestic flights primarily at Terminal 2 and international flights at Terminal 3 and, to a lesser extent, Terminal 4. Our five-year $1.2 billion renovation project at JFK, which began in 2010, is on schedule. The expansion and enhancement of Terminal 4, which includes the construction of nine new international gates, commenced in 2011 and is expected to be open in the spring of 2013. Upon completion of the Terminal 4 expansion, we will relocate our operations from Terminal 3 to Terminal 4, proceed with the demolition of Terminal 3, and thereafter conduct coordinated flight operations from Terminals 2 and 4. Once our project is complete, we expect that passengers will benefit from an enhanced customer experience and improved operational performance, including reduced taxi times and better on-time performance.
Results of Operations -
June 2012
and
2011
Quarters
Operating Revenue
Three Months Ended June 30,
(in millions)
2012
2011
Increase
%
Increase
Passenger:
Mainline
$
6,644
$
6,204
$
440
7
%
Regional carriers
1,807
1,687
120
7
%
Total passenger revenue
8,451
7,891
560
7
%
Cargo
262
264
(2
)
(1
)%
Other
1,019
998
21
2
%
Total operating revenue
$
9,732
$
9,153
$
579
6
%
Increase (Decrease)
vs. three months ended June 30, 2011
(in millions)
Three Months Ended June 30, 2012
Passenger
Revenue
RPMs
(1)
(Traffic)
ASMs
(2)
(Capacity)
Passenger Mile
Yield
PRASM
(3)
Load
Factor
Domestic
$
3,727
7
%
1
%
(1
)%
6
%
8
%
1.2
pts
Atlantic
1,584
1
%
(5
)%
(7
)%
7
%
9
%
1.5
pts
Pacific
860
20
%
11
%
10
%
8
%
9
%
1.1
pts
Latin America
473
8
%
3
%
—
%
5
%
8
%
2.8
pts
Total Mainline
6,644
7
%
1
%
(1
)%
6
%
8
%
1.4
pts
Regional carriers
1,807
7
%
(2
)%
(3
)%
9
%
11
%
1.2
pts
Total passenger revenue
$
8,451
7
%
—
%
(1
)%
7
%
8
%
1.4
pts
(1)
Revenue passenger miles (“RPMs”)
(2)
Available seat miles (“ASMs”)
(3)
Passenger revenue per ASM (“PRASM”)
Passenger Revenue.
Passenger revenue increased
$560 million
, or
7%
, due to an improvement in the passenger mile yield of
7%
on flat traffic, despite a
1%
decline in capacity. Passenger mile yield and unit revenue increased due to fare increases, higher revenue under corporate travel contracts and improvements in our products and services.
International mainline passenger revenue increased due to increased fares, including fuel surcharges, and improved business and leisure travel demand. Atlantic PRASM was up
9%
, driven by a
7%
increase in yield and a
7%
reduction in capacity. In early 2011, we faced industry overcapacity in the transatlantic market and in connection with our joint venture partners, AirFrance-KLM and Alitalia, we have reduced capacity in underperforming markets. Pacific passenger revenue increased
20%
on a
10%
and
11%
increase in capacity and traffic, respectively. These results reflect higher yield and traffic, as demand returned to levels seen prior to the March 2011 earthquake and tsunami in Japan.
16
Operating Expense
Three Months Ended June 30,
Increase
(Decrease)
% Increase
(Decrease)
(in millions)
2012
2011
Aircraft fuel and related taxes
$
3,305
$
2,663
$
642
24
%
Salaries and related costs
1,825
1,739
86
5
%
Contract carrier arrangements
1,416
1,410
6
—
%
Aircraft maintenance materials and outside repairs
548
485
63
13
%
Depreciation and amortization
388
381
7
2
%
Passenger commissions and other selling expenses
393
440
(47
)
(11
)%
Contracted services
397
415
(18
)
(4
)%
Landing fees and other rents
347
320
27
8
%
Passenger service
187
181
6
3
%
Aircraft rent
68
74
(6
)
(8
)%
Profit sharing
135
8
127
NM
Restructuring and other items
193
144
49
34
%
Other
396
412
(16
)
(4
)%
Total operating expense
$
9,598
$
8,672
$
926
11
%
Fuel Expense.
Including contract carriers under capacity purchase agreements, fuel expense increased
$618 million
despite a
2%
decline in consumption. The table below presents fuel expense, gallons consumed, and our average price per fuel gallon, including the impact of fuel hedge losses of
$716 million
in the
June 2012
quarter:
Three Months Ended June 30,
Increase
(Decrease)
% Increase
(Decrease)
(in millions, except per gallon data)
2012
2011
Aircraft fuel and related taxes
(1)
$
3,305
$
2,663
$
642
Aircraft fuel and related taxes included within contract carrier arrangements
521
545
(24
)
Total fuel expense
$
3,826
$
3,208
$
618
19
%
Total fuel consumption (gallons)
968
992
(24
)
(2
)%
Average price per fuel gallon
$
3.95
$
3.23
$
0.72
22
%
(1)
Includes the impact of fuel hedge activity described further in the table below.
The table below shows the impact of hedging on fuel expense and average price per fuel gallon:
Average Price Per Gallon
Three Months Ended June 30,
Change
Three Months Ended June 30,
Change
(in millions, except per gallon data)
2012
2011
2012
2011
Fuel purchase cost
$
3,110
$
3,315
$
(205
)
$
3.21
$
3.34
$
(0.13
)
Fuel hedge losses (gains)
716
(107
)
823
0.74
(0.11
)
0.85
Total fuel expense
$
3,826
$
3,208
$
618
$
3.95
$
3.23
$
0.72
MTM adjustments
(561
)
(11
)
(550
)
(0.58
)
(0.01
)
(0.57
)
Total fuel expense, adjusted
$
3,265
$
3,197
$
68
$
3.37
$
3.22
$
0.15
Fuel expense increased due to fuel hedge losses recorded in the
June 2012
quarter, as significant fuel price declines in the
June 2012
quarter resulted in a decrease in the value of our fuel hedge portfolio. During the
three months ended June 30, 2012
, our fuel hedge losses of
$716 million
included
$561 million
in losses for MTM adjustments.
These adjustments are based on market prices as of the end of the reporting period and assumptions described in Note 3.
Such market prices are not necessarily indicative of the actual future value of the underlying hedge in the contract settlement period.
Therefore, we adjust fuel expense for these items to arrive at a more meaningful measure of fuel cost.
Our average price per fuel gallon, adjusted (a non-GAAP financial measure as defined in "Supplemental Information" below), was
$3.37
for the
June 2012
quarter.
17
Salaries and related costs
. The increase in salaries and related costs is primarily due to employee pay increases, increases in pension expense and other benefits, offset by a 2% decrease in staffing.
During the
June 2012
quarter, we reached an agreement with ALPA that increases pay and benefits for our pilots. Our pilots and substantially all other employees received base pay increases on July 1, 2012 and will receive additional increases on January 1, 2013. These increases are designed both to recognize the upcoming change to the profit sharing program described below and to accelerate the planned 2013 pay increase for non-pilot employees.
Aircraft maintenance and outside repairs.
Aircraft maintenance materials and outside repairs consists of costs associated with (1) maintenance of aircraft used in our operations and (2) maintenance sales to third parties by our MRO services business. The increase in aircraft maintenance materials and outside repairs is primarily due to the cyclical timing of maintenance events on our fleet.
Passenger commissions and other selling expenses.
The decrease in passenger commissions and other selling expenses is primarily due to lower credit card fees, booking fees and international commission rates, partially offset by increases in sales.
Profit sharing.
Our broad based employee profit sharing program provides that, for each year in which we have an annual pre-tax profit, as defined by the terms of the program, we will pay a specified portion of that profit to employees. In determining the amount of profit sharing, the terms of the program specify the exclusion of special items, such as MTM adjustments and restructuring and other items, from pre-tax profit. During the
June 2012
quarter, our profit sharing program was modified so that we will pay 10% of profits, on the first $2.5 billion of profits effective January 1, 2013 compared to paying 15% of profits for 2012. Under the program, we will continue to pay 20% of profits above $2.5 billion.
Restructuring and other items.
Due to the nature of amounts recorded within restructuring and other items, a year over year comparison is not meaningful. For a discussion of charges recorded in restructuring and other items, see Note 7 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
During the March 2012 quarter, we announced voluntary workforce reduction programs primarily for eligible U.S. non-pilot employees. Approximately 2,000 employees enrolled in these programs in the June 2012 quarter and became eligible for retiree healthcare benefits. As a result, we recorded a
$171 million
charge for severance and related retiree healthcare costs (see Note 7).
18
Results of Operations -
Six Months Ended June 30, 2012
and
2011
Operating Revenue
Six Months Ended June 30,
(in millions)
2012
2011
Increase
%
Increase
Passenger:
Mainline
$
12,306
$
11,334
$
972
9
%
Regional carriers
3,371
3,132
239
8
%
Total passenger revenue
15,677
14,466
1,211
8
%
Cargo
506
514
(8
)
(2
)%
Other
1,962
1,920
42
2
%
Total operating revenue
$
18,145
$
16,900
$
1,245
7
%
Increase (Decrease)
vs. six months ended June 30, 2011
(in millions)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2012
Passenger
Revenue
RPMs
(1)
(Traffic)
ASMs
(2)
(Capacity)
Passenger Mile
Yield
PRASM
(3)
Load
Factor
Domestic
$
6,921
8
%
1
%
(2
)%
7
%
10
%
2.0
pts
Atlantic
2,672
4
%
(4
)%
(8
)%
8
%
13
%
3.6
pts
Pacific
1,717
17
%
8
%
5
%
9
%
12
%
1.9
pts
Latin America
996
10
%
3
%
—
%
7
%
10
%
2.3
pts
Total Mainline
12,306
9
%
1
%
(2
)%
8
%
11
%
2.4
pts
Regional carriers
3,371
8
%
(1
)%
(3
)%
8
%
10
%
1.6
pts
Total passenger revenue
$
15,677
8
%
1
%
(2
)%
8
%
11
%
2.3
pts
(1)
Revenue passenger miles (“RPMs”)
(2)
Available seat miles (“ASMs”)
(3)
Passenger revenue per ASM (“PRASM”)
Passenger Revenue.
Passenger revenue increased
$1.2 billion
, or
8%
, due to an improvement in the passenger mile yield of
8%
, despite a
2%
decline in capacity. Passenger mile yield and unit revenue increased due to fare increases, higher revenue under corporate travel contracts and improvements in our products and services.
International mainline passenger revenue increased due to increased fares, including fuel surcharges, and improved business and leisure travel demand. Atlantic PRASM was up
13%
, driven by a
8%
increase in yield and a
8%
reduction in capacity. In early 2011, we faced industry overcapacity in the transatlantic market and in connection with our joint venture partners, AirFrance-KLM and Alitalia, we have reduced capacity in underperforming markets. Pacific passenger revenue increased
17%
on a
5%
and
8%
increase in capacity and traffic, respectively. These results reflect higher yield and traffic, as demand returned to levels seen prior to the March 2011 earthquake and tsunami in Japan.
19
Operating Expense
Six Months Ended June 30,
Increase (Decrease)
% Increase (Decrease)
(in millions)
2012
2011
Aircraft fuel and related taxes
$
5,538
$
4,829
$
709
15
%
Salaries and related costs
3,588
3,466
122
4
%
Contract carrier arrangements
2,791
2,710
81
3
%
Aircraft maintenance materials and outside repairs
1,109
970
139
14
%
Depreciation and amortization
774
757
17
2
%
Passenger commissions and other selling expenses
773
809
(36
)
(4
)%
Contracted services
775
840
(65
)
(8
)%
Landing fees and other rents
652
633
19
3
%
Passenger service
358
345
13
4
%
Aircraft rent
143
152
(9
)
(6
)%
Profit sharing
135
8
127
NM
Restructuring and other items
181
151
30
20
%
Other
812
841
(29
)
(3
)%
Total operating expense
$
17,629
$
16,511
$
1,118
7
%
Fuel Expense.
Including contract carriers under capacity purchase agreements, fuel expense increased
$748 million
despite a
3%
decline in consumption. The table below presents fuel expense, gallons consumed, and our average price per fuel gallon, including the impact of fuel hedge losses of
$520 million
during the
six months ended June 30, 2012
:
Six Months Ended June 30,
Increase
(Decrease)
% Increase
(Decrease)
(in millions, except per gallon data)
2012
2011
Aircraft fuel and related taxes
(1)
$
5,538
$
4,829
$
709
Aircraft fuel and related taxes included within contract carrier arrangements
1,047
1,008
39
Total fuel expense
$
6,585
$
5,837
$
748
13
%
Total fuel consumption (gallons)
1,854
1,911
(57
)
(3
)%
Average price per fuel gallon
$
3.55
$
3.05
$
0.50
16
%
(1)
Includes the impact of fuel hedge activity described further in the table below.
The table below shows the impact of hedging on fuel expense and average price per fuel gallon:
Average Price Per Gallon
Six Months Ended June 30,
Change
Six Months Ended June 30,
Change
(in millions, except per gallon data)
2012
2011
2012
2011
Fuel purchase cost
$
6,065
$
6,051
$
14
$
3.27
$
3.16
$
0.11
Fuel hedge losses (gains)
520
(214
)
734
0.28
(0.11
)
0.39
Total fuel expense
$
6,585
$
5,837
$
748
$
3.55
$
3.05
$
0.50
MTM adjustments
(410
)
18
(428
)
(0.22
)
0.01
(0.23
)
Total fuel expense, adjusted
$
6,175
$
5,855
$
320
$
3.33
$
3.06
$
0.27
Fuel expense increased primarily due to fuel hedge losses recorded in the
six months ended June 30, 2012
, as significant fuel price declines in the
June 2012
quarter
resulted in a decrease in the value of our fuel hedge portfolio.
During the
six months ended June 30, 2012
, our net fuel hedge losses of
$520 million
included
$410 million
in losses for MTM adjustments.
These adjustments are based on market prices as of the end of the reporting period and assumptions described in Note 3.
Such market prices are not necessarily indicative of the actual future value of the underlying hedge in the contract settlement period.
Therefore, we adjust fuel expense for these items to arrive at a more meaningful measure of fuel cost.
Our average price per fuel gallon, adjusted (a non-GAAP financial measure as defined in "Supplemental Information" below), was
$3.33
for the
six months ended June 30, 2012
quarter.
20
Salaries and related costs
. The increase in salaries and related costs is primarily due to employee pay increases, increases in pension expense and other benefits, offset by a 3% decrease in staffing.
Aircraft maintenance materials and outside repairs.
Aircraft maintenance materials and outside repairs consists of costs associated with (1) maintenance of aircraft used in our operations and (2) maintenance sales to third parties by our MRO services business. Costs associated with the maintenance of our fleet increased primarily to the cyclical timing of maintenance events on our fleet. Additionally, costs associated with our MRO services business increased year-over-year due primarily to increased sales, reflected in other revenue above.
Passenger commissions and other selling expenses.
The decrease in passenger commissions and other selling expenses is primarily due to lower credit card fees, booking fees and international commission rates, partially offset by increases in sales.
Contracted Services.
Contracted services expense improved year-over-year due primarily to the impact of severe winter storms on our operations in the March 2011 quarter.
Restructuring and other items.
Due to the nature of amounts recorded within restructuring and other items, a year over year comparison is not meaningful. For a discussion of charges recorded in restructuring and other items, see Note 7 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Non-Operating Results
The following table shows the components of other expense, net:
Three Months Ended June 30,
(Unfavorable) Favorable
Six Months Ended June 30,
(Unfavorable) Favorable
(in millions)
2012
2011
2012
2011
Interest expense, net
$
(207
)
$
(233
)
$
26
$
(428
)
$
(454
)
$
26
Amortization of debt discount, net
(49
)
(46
)
(3
)
(100
)
(93
)
(7
)
Loss on extinguishment of debt
—
(13
)
13
—
(33
)
33
Foreign currency exchange
(37
)
3
(40
)
(15
)
6
(21
)
Miscellaneous, net
(5
)
3
(8
)
(10
)
(10
)
—
Total other expense, net
$
(298
)
$
(286
)
$
(12
)
$
(553
)
$
(584
)
$
31
Income Taxes
The following table shows the components of our income tax (provision) benefit:
Three Months Ended June 30,
Six Months Ended June 30,
(in millions)
2012
2011
2012
2011
International and state income tax provision
$
(4
)
$
(3
)
$
(7
)
$
(3
)
Alternative minimum tax refunds and other
—
6
—
78
Income tax (provision) benefit
$
(4
)
$
3
$
(7
)
$
75
We consider all income sources, including other comprehensive income, in determining the amount of tax benefit allocated to continuing operations. During the
three and six months ended June 30, 2012
, we did not record an income tax provision for U.S. federal income tax purposes since our deferred tax assets are fully reserved by a valuation allowance. For a discussion of our valuation allowance, see Note 9 to the Notes of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
21
Operating Statistics
The following table sets forth our operating statistics:
Three Months Ended June 30,
Six Months Ended June 30,
Consolidated
(1)
2012
2011
2012
2011
Revenue passenger miles (millions)
50,520
50,366
93,871
93,295
Available seat miles (millions)
59,382
60,141
113,790
116,360
Passenger mile yield
16.73
¢
15.67
¢
16.70
¢
15.51
¢
Passenger revenue per available seat mile
14.23
¢
13.12
¢
13.78
¢
12.43
¢
Operating cost per available seat mile (CASM)
16.16
¢
14.42
¢
15.49
¢
14.19
¢
CASM-Ex
(2)
8.77
¢
8.46
¢
9.01
¢
8.70
¢
Passenger load factor
85.1
%
83.7
%
82.5
%
80.2
%
Fuel gallons consumed (millions)
968
992
1,854
1,911
Average price per fuel gallon
(3)
$
3.95
$
3.23
$
3.55
$
3.05
Average price per fuel gallon, adjusted
(2)
$
3.37
$
3.22
$
3.33
$
3.06
Full-time equivalent employees, end of period
80,646
82,347
(1)
Includes the operations of our contract carriers under capacity purchase agreements, except full-time equivalent employees which excludes employees of contract carriers that we do not own.
(2)
Non-GAAP financial measure as defined in "Supplemental Information" below.
(3)
Includes the impact of fuel hedge activity.
22
Fleet Information
Our operating aircraft fleet, commitments, and options at
June 30, 2012
are summarized in the following table:
Current Fleet
(1)
Aircraft Type
Owned
Capital
Lease
Operating
Lease
Total
Average
Age
Commitments
(2)
Options
B-737-700
10
—
—
10
3.4
—
—
B-737-800
73
—
—
73
11.4
—
—
B-737-900ER
—
—
—
—
—
100
30
B-747-400
4
8
3
15
19.0
—
—
B-757-200
89
34
34
157
19.1
—
—
B-757-300
16
—
—
16
9.3
—
—
B-767-300
10
2
4
16
21.4
—
—
B-767-300ER
50
4
4
58
16.3
—
4
B-767-400ER
21
—
—
21
11.3
—
7
B-777-200ER
8
—
—
8
12.4
—
—
B-777-200LR
10
—
—
10
3.2
—
12
B-787-8
—
—
—
—
—
18
—
A319-100
55
—
2
57
10.4
—
—
A320-200
41
—
28
69
17.3
—
—
A330-200
11
—
—
11
7.2
—
—
A330-300
21
—
—
21
6.8
—
—
MD-88
67
50
—
117
22.0
—
—
MD-90
36
8
—
44
15.4
11
—
DC9-50
19
—
—
19
34.1
—
—
CRJ-100
6
9
8
23
13.6
—
—
CRJ-700
15
—
—
15
1.3
—
—
CRJ-900
13
—
—
13
4.6
—
—
Embraer 175
—
—
—
—
—
—
36
Total
575
115
83
773
16.0
129
89
(1)
Excludes certain aircraft we own or lease which are operated by third party contract carriers on our behalf shown in the table below.
(2)
Excludes our orders for five A319-100 aircraft and two A320-200 aircraft because we have the right to cancel these orders.
In July 2012, we finalized an agreement with Southwest Airlines and Boeing to add 88 B-717-200 aircraft with deliveries beginning in 2013 and continuing through 2015.
The following table summarizes the aircraft fleet operated by third party contract carriers on our behalf at
June 30, 2012
:
Fleet Type
Carrier
CRJ-200
CRJ-700
CRJ-900
ERJ-145
Embraer 170
Embraer 175
Total
Pinnacle Airlines, Inc.
140
—
57
—
—
—
197
ExpressJet Airlines, Inc.
92
38
10
—
—
—
140
SkyWest Airlines, Inc.
63
17
21
—
—
—
101
Compass Airlines, Inc.
—
—
—
—
6
36
42
Shuttle America Corporation
—
—
—
—
14
16
30
Chautauqua Airlines, Inc.
—
—
—
24
—
—
24
GoJet Airlines, LLC
—
12
—
—
—
—
12
Total
295
67
88
24
20
52
546
Pinnacle Airlines Corp. ("Pinnacle") along with Pinnacle Airlines Inc. and other of its subsidiaries, filed for bankruptcy in April 2012. We do not believe that Pinnacle's bankruptcy filing will have a material effect on our operations or financial statements.
23
Financial Condition and Liquidity
We expect to meet our cash needs for the next 12 months from cash flows from operations, cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments and financing arrangements. As of
June 30, 2012
, we had
$5.3 billion
in unrestricted liquidity, including
$1.8 billion
in availability under credit facilities.
Debt and Capital Leases.
At
June 30, 2012
, total debt and capital leases, including current maturities, was
$13.0 billion
, a
$791 million
reduction from
December 31, 2011
. Our ability to obtain additional financing, if needed, on acceptable terms could be adversely affected by the fact that a significant portion of our assets are subject to liens.
In July 2012, we completed a
$480 million
offering of Pass Through Certificates, Series 2012-1 ("2012-1 EETC") through a pass through trust. The 2012-1 EETC has a weighted average interest rate of
5.31%
and matures in May 2020. We plan to use the proceeds (currently held in escrow) primarily to refinance aircraft securing the Delta 2002-1 EETC, which matured on July 2, 2012, and the Northwest 2001-2 EETC, which matures in August 2013 and is expected to be prepaid in the September 2012 quarter.
Pension Obligations.
We sponsor defined benefit pension plans for eligible employees and retirees. These plans are closed to new entrants and are frozen for future benefit accruals. During the
six months ended June 30, 2012
, we contributed
$678 million
to our defined benefit pension plans. As a result of these contributions, we satisfied, on an accelerated basis, the minimum required contributions for our defined benefit pension plans for 2012.
Sources and Uses of Cash
Cash flows from operating activities
Cash provided by operating activities totaled
$1.5 billion
and
$1.8 billion
for the
six months ended June 30, 2012
and
2011
, respectively, primarily reflecting advance ticket sales for peak season travel and net income after adjusting for items such as depreciation and amortization.
During the
six months ended June 30, 2012
, cash provided by operating activities was reduced by
$678 million
in pension funding,
$350 million
in posted hedge margin and $264 million in profit sharing payments for 2011. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, cash provided by operating activities was reduced by $312 million in pension funding and $313 million in profit sharing payments for 2010.
Cash flows from investing activities
The following table shows the components of net cash used in investing activities:
Six Months Ended June 30,
(in millions)
2012
2011
Flight equipment
$
(609
)
$
(481
)
Technology and facilities
(215
)
(172
)
Purchase of oil refinery (see Note 2)
(180
)
—
Net purchases of short-term investments and other
3
(221
)
Net cash used in investing activities
$
(1,001
)
$
(874
)
Flight equipment primarily includes (1) investments in full flat-bed seats in BusinessElite and other interior upgrades; (2) modifications of recently acquired MD-90s; and (3) other aircraft modifications and parts. Technology and facilities consists of improvements in delta.com and mobile apps and investments at our airports at LaGuardia and JFK. Net purchases of short-term investments and other in 2011 represents the purchase of treasury bills, which are reflected as short-term investments on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
24
Cash flows from financing activities
Cash used in financing activities totaled
$580 million
for the
six months ended June 30, 2012
, reflecting the repayment of
$741 million
in long-term debt and capital lease obligations, partially offset by a
$158 million
net increase in the fuel card obligation.
Cash used in financing activities totaled
$937 million
for the
six months ended June 30, 2011
, reflecting the repayment of $1.0 billion in long-term debt and capital lease obligations, partially offset by $245 million in proceeds from aircraft financing. We also refinanced the loans under the $2.5 billion senior secured exit financing facilities.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
For information regarding our Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates, see the “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” section of “Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our Form 10-K.
25
Supplemental Information
We sometimes use information ("non-GAAP financial measures") that is derived from the Consolidated Financial Statements, but that is not presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. (“GAAP”). Under the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission rules, non-GAAP financial measures may be considered in addition to results prepared in accordance with GAAP, but should not be considered a substitute for or superior to GAAP results. The tables below show reconciliations of non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures.
To determine our average price per fuel gallon, adjusted, we exclude mark-to-market adjustments on fuel hedges recorded in periods other than the settlement period ("MTM adjustments").
These adjustments are based on market prices as of the end of the reporting period and assumptions described in Note 3.
Such market prices are not necessarily indicative of the actual future value of the underlying hedge in the contract settlement period.
Therefore, we adjust fuel expense for these items to arrive at a more meaningful measure of fuel cost.
Three Months Ended June 30,
Six Months Ended June 30,
Consolidated
2012
2011
2012
2011
Average price per fuel gallon
(1)
$
3.95
$
3.23
$
3.55
$
3.05
MTM adjustments
(0.58
)
(0.01
)
(0.22
)
0.01
Average price per fuel gallon, adjusted
(2)
$
3.37
$
3.22
$
3.33
$
3.06
(1)
Includes fuel expense incurred under contract carriers arrangements and the impact of fuel hedge activity.
(2)
Includes the impact of fuel hedges settling during the period.
In addition to MTM adjustments, we exclude the following items from CASM to determine CASM-Ex:
•
Aircraft fuel and related taxes.
The volatility in fuel prices impacts the comparability of year-over-year financial performance. Management believes the exclusion of aircraft fuel and related taxes (including our contract carriers under capacity purchase arrangements) allows investors to better understand and analyze our non-fuel costs and our year-over-year financial performance.
•
Ancillary businesses
. Ancillary businesses are not related to the generation of a seat mile. These businesses include aircraft maintenance and staffing services we provide to third parties and our vacation wholesale operations.
•
Profit sharing.
Management believes the exclusion of this item provides a more meaningful comparison of our results to the airline industry and prior years' results.
•
Restructuring and other items.
Management believes the exclusion of this item is helpful to investors to evaluate our recurring core operational performance in the period shown.
Three Months Ended June 30,
Six Months Ended June 30,
2012
2011
2012
2011
CASM
16.16
¢
14.42
¢
15.49
¢
14.19
¢
Items excluded:
Aircraft fuel and related taxes
(5.49
)
(5.31
)
(5.42
)
(5.02
)
Ancillary businesses
(0.40
)
(0.38
)
(0.42
)
(0.35
)
Profit sharing
(0.23
)
(0.01
)
(0.12
)
(0.01
)
Restructuring and other items
(0.33
)
(0.24
)
(0.16
)
(0.13
)
MTM adjustments
(0.94
)
(0.02
)
(0.36
)
0.02
CASM-Ex
8.77
¢
8.46
¢
9.01
¢
8.70
¢
26
As discussed above, management believes the volatility in fuel prices impacts the comparability of year-over-year financial performance. The table below shows changes in operating expense excluding the impact of fuel.
Three Months Ended June 30,
(in millions)
2012
2011
Change
Operating expense
$
9,598
$
8,672
$
926
Items excluded:
Aircraft fuel and related taxes
(3,305
)
(2,663
)
(642
)
Aircraft fuel and related taxes included within contract carriers arrangements
(521
)
(545
)
24
Operating expense excluding fuel
$
5,772
$
5,464
$
308
27
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
There have been no material changes in market risk from the information provided in “Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” in our Form 10-K, other than those discussed below.
The following sensitivity analysis does not consider the effects of a change in demand for air travel, the economy as a whole or actions we may take to seek to mitigate our exposure to a particular risk. For these and other reasons, the actual results of changes in these prices or rates may differ materially from the following hypothetical results.
Aircraft Fuel Price Risk
Our results of operations are materially impacted by changes in aircraft fuel prices.
We actively manage our fuel price risk through a hedging program intended to generate a positive cash position to defray the cost of jet fuel purchases during upward fuel price movements, while preserving participation in downward price movements of jet fuel to the extent practical.
This fuel hedging program utilizes several different contract and commodity types, which are intended to create a risk mitigating hedge portfolio.
The economic effectiveness of this hedge portfolio is frequently tested against our financial targets.
The hedge portfolio is rebalanced from time to time according to market conditions, which may result in locking in gains or losses on hedge contracts prior to their settlement dates.
Our fuel hedge portfolio consists of call options; put options; combinations of two or more call options and put options; swap contracts; and futures contracts.
The products underlying the hedge contracts include heating oil, crude oil, jet fuel and diesel fuel, as these commodities are highly correlated with the price of jet fuel that we consume.
Our fuel hedge contracts contain margin funding requirements.
The margin funding requirements may cause us to post margin to counterparties or may cause counterparties to post margin to us as market prices in the underlying hedged items change.
If fuel prices decrease significantly from the levels existing at the time we enter into fuel hedge contracts, we may be required to post a significant amount of margin. We may adjust our hedge portfolio from time to time in response to margin posting requirements.
For the
six months ended June 30, 2012
, aircraft fuel and related taxes, including our contract carriers under capacity purchase agreements, accounted for
$6.6 billion
, or
37%
, of our total operating expense. We recognized
$520 million
of net fuel hedge losses during the
six months ended June 30, 2012
, including
$410 million
of mark-to-market losses primarily relating to hedge contracts settling in future periods.
The following table shows the projected cash impact to fuel cost assuming 10% and 20% increases or decreases in fuel prices. The hedge gain (loss) reflects the change in the projected cash settlement value of our open fuel hedge contracts at
June 30, 2012
based on their contract settlement dates, assuming the same 10% and 20% changes.
Six Months ending December 31, 2012
Fuel Hedge Margin (Posted to) Received from Counterparties
(in millions)
Decrease (Increase) to Unhedged Fuel Cost
(1)
Hedge Gain (Loss)
(2)
Net Impact
+ 20%
$
(1,040
)
$
250
$
(790
)
$
30
+ 10%
(520
)
150
(370
)
(20
)
- 10%
520
(220
)
300
(480
)
- 20%
1,040
(530
)
510
(920
)
(1)
Projections based upon the (increase) decrease to unhedged fuel cost as compared to the jet fuel price per gallon of $2.77, excluding transportation costs and taxes, at
June 30, 2012
and estimated fuel consumption of 1.9 billion gallons for the six months ending December 31, 2012.
(2)
Projections based on average futures prices by contract settlement month compared to futures prices at
June 30, 2012
.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, performed an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, which have been designed to permit us to effectively identify and timely disclose important information. Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, concluded that the controls and procedures were effective as of
June 30, 2012
to ensure that material information was accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
During the
June 2012
quarter, we did not make any changes in our internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
28
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Delta Air Lines, Inc.
We have reviewed the consolidated balance sheet of Delta Air Lines, Inc. (the Company) as of
June 30, 2012
, and the related condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) for the three-month and six-month periods ended
June 30, 2012
and
2011
, and the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the six-month periods ended
June 30, 2012
and
2011
. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.
We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of Delta Air Lines, Inc. as of
December 31, 2011
and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' deficit, and cash flows for the year ended
December 31, 2011
and in our report dated
February 10, 2012
, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
Atlanta, Georgia
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
July 25, 2012
29
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
“Item 3. Legal Proceedings” of our Form 10-K includes a discussion of other legal proceedings. There have been no material changes from the legal proceedings described in our Form 10-K.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
“Item 1A. Risk Factors” of our Form 10-K includes a discussion of our risk factors. The information below updates, and should be read in conjunction with, the risk factors and information disclosed in our Form 10-K. Except as presented below, there have been no material changes from the risk factors described in our Form 10-K.
Our business and results of operations are dependent on the price and availability of aircraft fuel. High fuel costs or cost increases could have a materially adverse effect on our operating results. Likewise, significant disruptions in the supply of aircraft fuel would materially adversely affect our operations and operating results.
Our operating results are significantly impacted by changes in the price and availability of aircraft fuel. Fuel prices have increased substantially since the middle part of the last decade and have been extremely volatile during the last several years. In 2011, our average fuel price per gallon was $3.06, a 31% increase from an average fuel price of $2.33 in 2010. In 2010, our average fuel price per gallon was $2.33, an 8% increase from an average fuel price of $2.15 in 2009. In 2008, our average fuel price per gallon was $3.16, a 41% increase from an average price of $2.24 in 2007, which in turn was significantly higher than fuel prices just a few years earlier. Fuel costs represented 36%, 30% and 29% of our operating expense in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Volatility in fuel costs has had a significant negative effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
Our ability to pass along the increased costs of fuel to our customers may be affected by the competitive nature of the airline industry. We often have not been able to increase our fares to offset fully the effect of increased fuel costs in the past and we may not be able to do so in the future. In addition, our aircraft fuel purchase contracts do not provide material protection against price increases or assure the availability of our fuel supplies. We purchase most of our aircraft fuel under contracts that establish the price based on various market indices. We also purchase aircraft fuel on the spot market, from offshore sources and under contracts that permit the refiners to set the price.
We are currently able to obtain adequate supplies of aircraft fuel, but it is impossible to predict the future availability or price of aircraft fuel. In the future, we expect to acquire a significant amount of jet fuel from our wholly-owned subsidiary, Monroe, and through strategic agreements that Monroe has with BP and Phillips 66. Weather-related events, natural disasters, political disruptions or wars involving oil-producing countries, changes in governmental policy concerning aircraft fuel production, transportation or marketing, environmental concerns and other unpredictable events may result in crude oil and fuel supply shortages and crude oil and fuel price increases in the future. Additional increases in fuel costs or disruptions in fuel supplies could have additional negative effects on us.
The operation of an oil refinery by our wholly-owned subsidiary may pose risks to our consolidated financial results of operations that are different from the risks associated with our airline operations.
Our wholly-owned subsidiary, Monroe, recently acquired an oil refinery complex located near Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Our ability to acquire jet fuel from Monroe and through strategic agreements with BP and Phillips 66 is expected to reduce our exposure to increases in fuel costs. Monroe's operation of the refinery, however, may pose risks to our consolidated financial results of operations that are different from the risks associated with our airline operations.
Operational.
Because we plan to acquire a large amount of our jet fuel from Monroe, the disruption or interruption of production at the refinery could have an impact on our ability to acquire all of the jet fuel needed for our operations. Disruptions or interruptions of production at the refinery could result from various sources including a major accident or mechanical failure, interruption of supply or delivery of crude oil, work stoppages relating to organized labor issues, or damage from severe weather or other natural or man-made disasters, including acts of terrorism. If the refinery were to experience an interruption in operations, the financial benefits we expect to achieve from buying fuel from Monroe could be materially adversely affected (to the extent not recoverable through insurance) because of lost production and repair costs.
Insurance
. Monroe's refining operations are subject to various hazards unique to refinery operations, including explosions, fires, toxic emissions and natural catastrophes. Monroe's insurance coverage does not cover all potential losses, costs or liabilities and Monroe could suffer losses for uninsurable or uninsured risks or in amounts greater than its insurance coverage.
30
In addition, Monroe's ability to obtain and maintain adequate insurance may be affected by conditions in the insurance market over which it has not control. If Monroe were to incur a significant liability for which it is not fully insured or for which insurance companies do not or are unable to provide coverage, this could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial results of operations.
Environmental.
Monroe's operations are subject to numerous environmental laws and extensive regulations, including those relating to the discharge of materials into the environment, waste management, pollution prevention measures, and greenhouse gas emissions. If Monroe violates or fails to comply with these laws and regulations, Monroe could be fined or otherwise sanctioned, which if significant could have a material adverse effect on our financial results. In addition, the enactment of new environmental laws and regulations, including any laws or regulations relating to greenhouse gas emissions, could significantly increase the level of expenditures required for environmental matters for Monroe.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
We withheld the following shares of common stock to satisfy tax withholding obligations during the
June 2012
quarter from the distributions described below. These shares may be deemed to be “issuer purchases” of shares that are required to be disclosed pursuant to this Item.
Period
Total Number of Shares Purchased
(1)
Average Price Paid per Share
Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs
(1)
Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plan or Programs
April 2012
12,167
$
9.97
12,167
(1)
May 2012
23,070
$
11.14
23,070
(1)
June 2012
2,787
$
11.45
2,787
(1)
Total
38,024
38,024
(1)
Shares were withheld from employees to satisfy certain tax obligations due in connection with grants of stock under the Delta Air Lines, Inc. 2007 Performance Compensation Plan (the "2007 Plan"). The 2007 Plan provides for the withholding of shares to satisfy tax obligations. It does not specify a maximum number of shares that can be withheld for this purpose.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
(a) Exhibits
10.1
Terms of 2012 Restricted Stock Awards for Non-Employee Directors
15
Letter from Ernst & Young LLP regarding unaudited interim financial information
31.1
Certification by Delta's Chief Executive Officer with respect to Delta's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
June 30, 2012
31.2
Certification by Delta's Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer with respect to Delta's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
June 30, 2012
32
Certification pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code by Delta's Chief Executive Officer and Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer with respect to Delta's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
June 30, 2012
101.INS
XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.DEF
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.CAL
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.LAB
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document
101.PRE
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
31
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Delta Air Lines, Inc.
(Registrant)
/s/ Michael O. Randolfi
Michael O. Randolfi
Senior Vice President - Finance and Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)
July 25, 2012
32