Companies:
10,785
total market cap:
$133.897 T
Sign In
๐บ๐ธ
EN
English
$ USD
โฌ
EUR
๐ช๐บ
โน
INR
๐ฎ๐ณ
ยฃ
GBP
๐ฌ๐ง
$
CAD
๐จ๐ฆ
$
AUD
๐ฆ๐บ
$
NZD
๐ณ๐ฟ
$
HKD
๐ญ๐ฐ
$
SGD
๐ธ๐ฌ
Global ranking
Ranking by countries
America
๐บ๐ธ United States
๐จ๐ฆ Canada
๐ฒ๐ฝ Mexico
๐ง๐ท Brazil
๐จ๐ฑ Chile
Europe
๐ช๐บ European Union
๐ฉ๐ช Germany
๐ฌ๐ง United Kingdom
๐ซ๐ท France
๐ช๐ธ Spain
๐ณ๐ฑ Netherlands
๐ธ๐ช Sweden
๐ฎ๐น Italy
๐จ๐ญ Switzerland
๐ต๐ฑ Poland
๐ซ๐ฎ Finland
Asia
๐จ๐ณ China
๐ฏ๐ต Japan
๐ฐ๐ท South Korea
๐ญ๐ฐ Hong Kong
๐ธ๐ฌ Singapore
๐ฎ๐ฉ Indonesia
๐ฎ๐ณ India
๐ฒ๐พ Malaysia
๐น๐ผ Taiwan
๐น๐ญ Thailand
๐ป๐ณ Vietnam
Others
๐ฆ๐บ Australia
๐ณ๐ฟ New Zealand
๐ฎ๐ฑ Israel
๐ธ๐ฆ Saudi Arabia
๐น๐ท Turkey
๐ท๐บ Russia
๐ฟ๐ฆ South Africa
>> All Countries
Ranking by categories
๐ All assets by Market Cap
๐ Automakers
โ๏ธ Airlines
๐ซ Airports
โ๏ธ Aircraft manufacturers
๐ฆ Banks
๐จ Hotels
๐ Pharmaceuticals
๐ E-Commerce
โ๏ธ Healthcare
๐ฆ Courier services
๐ฐ Media/Press
๐ท Alcoholic beverages
๐ฅค Beverages
๐ Clothing
โ๏ธ Mining
๐ Railways
๐ฆ Insurance
๐ Real estate
โ Ports
๐ผ Professional services
๐ด Food
๐ Restaurant chains
โ๐ป Software
๐ Semiconductors
๐ฌ Tobacco
๐ณ Financial services
๐ข Oil&Gas
๐ Electricity
๐งช Chemicals
๐ฐ Investment
๐ก Telecommunication
๐๏ธ Retail
๐ฅ๏ธ Internet
๐ Construction
๐ฎ Video Game
๐ป Tech
๐ฆพ AI
>> All Categories
ETFs
๐ All ETFs
๐๏ธ Bond ETFs
๏ผ Dividend ETFs
โฟ Bitcoin ETFs
โข Ethereum ETFs
๐ช Crypto Currency ETFs
๐ฅ Gold ETFs & ETCs
๐ฅ Silver ETFs & ETCs
๐ข๏ธ Oil ETFs & ETCs
๐ฝ Commodities ETFs & ETNs
๐ Emerging Markets ETFs
๐ Small-Cap ETFs
๐ Low volatility ETFs
๐ Inverse/Bear ETFs
โฌ๏ธ Leveraged ETFs
๐ Global/World ETFs
๐บ๐ธ USA ETFs
๐บ๐ธ S&P 500 ETFs
๐บ๐ธ Dow Jones ETFs
๐ช๐บ Europe ETFs
๐จ๐ณ China ETFs
๐ฏ๐ต Japan ETFs
๐ฎ๐ณ India ETFs
๐ฌ๐ง UK ETFs
๐ฉ๐ช Germany ETFs
๐ซ๐ท France ETFs
โ๏ธ Mining ETFs
โ๏ธ Gold Mining ETFs
โ๏ธ Silver Mining ETFs
๐งฌ Biotech ETFs
๐ฉโ๐ป Tech ETFs
๐ Real Estate ETFs
โ๏ธ Healthcare ETFs
โก Energy ETFs
๐ Renewable Energy ETFs
๐ก๏ธ Insurance ETFs
๐ฐ Water ETFs
๐ด Food & Beverage ETFs
๐ฑ Socially Responsible ETFs
๐ฃ๏ธ Infrastructure ETFs
๐ก Innovation ETFs
๐ Semiconductors ETFs
๐ Aerospace & Defense ETFs
๐ Cybersecurity ETFs
๐ฆพ Artificial Intelligence ETFs
Watchlist
Account
First Bancorp
FNLC
#7911
Rank
$0.31 B
Marketcap
๐บ๐ธ
United States
Country
$28.03
Share price
-0.67%
Change (1 day)
16.69%
Change (1 year)
๐ฆ Banks
๐ณ Financial services
Categories
Market cap
Revenue
Earnings
Price history
P/E ratio
P/S ratio
More
Price history
P/E ratio
P/S ratio
P/B ratio
Operating margin
EPS
Stock Splits
Dividends
Dividend yield
Shares outstanding
Fails to deliver
Cost to borrow
Total assets
Total liabilities
Total debt
Cash on Hand
Net Assets
Annual Reports (10-K)
First Bancorp
Quarterly Reports (10-Q)
Financial Year FY2015 Q3
First Bancorp - 10-Q quarterly report FY2015 Q3
Text size:
Small
Medium
Large
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
[X] Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2015
Commission File Number 0-26589
THE FIRST BANCORP, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
MAINE
01-0404322
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
MAIN STREET, DAMARISCOTTA, MAINE
04543
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip code)
(207) 563-3195
Registrant's telephone number, including area code
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes [X] No[_]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site,
if any, every,Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405
of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes [X] No[_]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of "accelerated filer and large accelerated filer" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer [_] Accelerated filer [X] Non-accelerated filer [_]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
Yes [_] No [X]
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant's classes of common stock as of
November 2, 2015
Common Stock: 10,751,035 shares
Table of Contents
Part I. Financial Information
Page 1
Selected Financial Data (Unaudited)
Page 1
Item 1 – Financial Statements
Page 2
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Page 2
Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)
Page 3
Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income
(Unaudited)
Page 4
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity (Unaudited)
Page 5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
Page 6
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Page 7
Note 1 – Basis of Presentation
Page 7
Note 2 –Investment Securities
Page 7
Note 3 – Loans
Page 11
Note 4 – Allowance for Loan Losses
Page 21
Note 5 – Stock Options and Stock Based Compensation
Page 28
Note 6 – Preferred and Common Stock
Page 29
Note 7 – Earnings Per Share
Page 30
Note 8 – Employee Benefit Plans
Page 31
Note 9 - Other Comprehensive Income
(Loss)
Page 33
Note 10 – Acquisitions and Intangible Assets
Page 34
Note 11 – Mortgage Servicing Rights
Page 34
Note 12 – Income Taxes
Page 35
Note 13 - Certificates of Deposit
Page 35
Note 14 – Reclassifications
Page 35
Note 15 – Fair Value Disclosures
Page 35
Note 16 – Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Standards
Page 41
Item 2 – Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Page 43
Forward-Looking Statements
Page 43
Critical Accounting Policies
Page 43
Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures
Page 44
Executive Summary
Page 45
Net Interest Income
Page 46
Average Daily Balance Sheets
Page 49
Non-Interest Income
Page 50
Non-Interest Expense
Page 50
Income Taxes
Page 50
Investments
Page 50
Impaired Securities
Page 52
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock
Page 54
Loans and Loans Held for Sale
Page 54
Credit Risk Management and Allowance for Loan Losses
Page 56
Non-Performing Loans and Troubled Debt Restructured
Page 59
Impaired Loans
Page 62
Past Due Loans
Page 62
Potential Problem Loans and Loans in Process of Foreclosure
Page 62
Other Real Estate Owned
Page 63
Liquidity Management
Page 64
Deposits
Page 65
Borrowed Funds
Page 65
Shareholders' Equity
Page 65
Off-Balance-Sheet Financial Instruments and Contractual Obligations
Page 66
Item 3 – Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Page 67
Market-Risk Management
Page 67
Asset/Liability Management
Page 67
Interest Rate Risk Management
Page 68
Item 4 - Controls and Procedures
Page 68
Part II. Other Information
Page 70
Item 1 – Legal Proceedings
Page 70
Item 1a – Risk Factors
Page 70
Item 2 – Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Page 70
Item 3 – Default Upon Senior Securities
Page 70
Item 4 – Other Information
Page 70
Item 5 – Exhibits
Page 71
Signatures
Page 73
Part I. Financial Information
Selected Financial Data (Unaudited)
The First Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Dollars in thousands,
As of and for the nine months ended September 30,
As of and for the quarters ended September 30,
except for per share amounts
2015
2014
2015
2014
Summary of Operations
Interest Income
$
37,772
$
38,232
$
12,833
$
12,869
Interest Expense
7,481
8,682
2,322
2,865
Net Interest Income
30,291
29,550
10,511
10,004
Provision for Loan Losses
1,100
850
200
350
Non-Interest Income
9,467
8,446
2,975
3,656
Non-Interest Expense
21,952
22,345
7,707
7,802
Net Income
12,437
11,283
4,188
4,108
Per Common Share Data
Basic Earnings per Share
$
1.17
$
1.06
$
0.39
$
0.39
Diluted Earnings per Share
1.16
1.05
0.39
0.38
Cash Dividends Declared
0.650
0.620
0.220
0.210
Book Value per Common Share
15.55
14.85
15.55
14.85
Tangible Book Value per Common Share
2
12.75
12.03
12.75
12.03
Market Value
19.10
16.67
19.10
16.67
Financial Ratios
Return on Average Equity
1
10.05
%
9.68
%
9.97
%
10.20
%
Return on Average Tangible Common Equity
1,2
12.29
%
12.02
%
12.18
%
12.60
%
Return on Average Assets
1
1.11
%
1.02
%
1.09
%
1.09
%
Average Equity to Average Assets
11.05
%
10.52
%
10.88
%
10.70
%
Average Tangible Equity to Average Assets
2
9.03
%
8.47
%
8.92
%
8.66
%
Net Interest Margin Tax-Equivalent
1,2
3.09
%
3.10
%
3.11
%
3.07
%
Dividend Payout Ratio
55.56
%
58.49
%
56.41
%
53.85
%
Allowance for Loan Losses/Total Loans
1.00
%
1.28
%
1.00
%
1.28
%
Non-Performing Loans to Total Loans
0.83
%
1.30
%
0.83
%
1.30
%
Non-Performing Assets to Total Assets
0.65
%
1.10
%
0.65
%
1.10
%
Efficiency Ratio
2
53.76
%
56.35
%
53.88
%
58.03
%
At Period End
Total Assets
$
1,539,672
$
1,488,637
$
1,539,672
$
1,488,637
Total Loans
963,151
908,115
963,151
908,115
Total Investment Securities
475,167
486,572
475,167
486,572
Total Deposits
1,058,365
1,055,322
1,058,365
1,055,322
Total Shareholders' Equity
167,141
159,190
167,141
159,190
1
Annualized using a 365-day basis for both years.
2
These ratios use non-GAAP financial measures. See Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for additional disclosures and information.
Page 1
Item 1 – Financial Statements
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
The First Bancorp, Inc.
We have reviewed the accompanying interim consolidated financial information of The First Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary as of
September 30, 2015
and
2014
and for the three-month and nine-month periods then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.
We conducted our reviews in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which is to express an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying interim consolidated financial statements for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
/s/ Berry Dunn McNeil & Parker, LLC
Bangor, Maine
November 6, 2015
Page 2
Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)
The First Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
September 30,
2015
December 31, 2014
September 30,
2014
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents
$
19,169,000
$
13,057,000
$
17,167,000
Interest bearing deposits in other banks
301,000
3,559,000
773,000
Securities available for sale
215,933,000
185,261,000
190,920,000
Securities to be held to maturity (fair value of $248,344,000 at September 30, 2015, $279,704,000 at December 31, 2014 and $280,779,000 at September 30, 2014)
245,322,000
275,919,000
281,740,000
Restricted equity securities, at cost
13,912,000
13,912,000
13,912,000
Loans held for sale
200,000
—
383,000
Loans
963,151,000
917,564,000
908,115,000
Less allowance for loan losses
9,677,000
10,344,000
11,641,000
Net loans
953,474,000
907,220,000
896,474,000
Accrued interest receivable
5,189,000
4,748,000
5,141,000
Premises and equipment, net
21,704,000
22,619,000
22,721,000
Other real estate owned
1,916,000
3,785,000
4,557,000
Goodwill
29,805,000
29,805,000
29,805,000
Other assets
32,747,000
22,246,000
25,044,000
Total assets
$
1,539,672,000
$
1,482,131,000
$
1,488,637,000
Liabilities
Demand deposits
$
128,555,000
$
113,133,000
$
119,512,000
NOW deposits
246,155,000
199,977,000
213,694,000
Money market deposits
95,217,000
98,607,000
99,260,000
Savings deposits
199,131,000
165,601,000
159,080,000
Certificates of deposit
389,307,000
447,501,000
463,776,000
Total deposits
1,058,365,000
1,024,819,000
1,055,322,000
Borrowed funds – short term
152,233,000
189,775,000
168,493,000
Borrowed funds – long term
145,136,000
90,141,000
90,143,000
Other liabilities
16,797,000
15,842,000
15,489,000
Total liabilities
1,372,531,000
1,320,577,000
1,329,447,000
Shareholders' equity
Common stock, one cent par value per share
107,000
107,000
107,000
Additional paid-in capital
59,667,000
59,282,000
59,053,000
Retained earnings
105,273,000
99,816,000
98,643,000
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
Net unrealized gain on securities available for sale
2,318,000
2,522,000
1,227,000
Net unrealized loss on securities transferred from available for sale to held to maturity
(99,000
)
(48,000
)
(28,000
)
Net unrealized gain (loss) on postretirement benefit costs
(125,000
)
(125,000
)
188,000
Total shareholders' equity
167,141,000
161,554,000
159,190,000
Total liabilities & shareholders' equity
$
1,539,672,000
$
1,482,131,000
$
1,488,637,000
Common Stock
Number of shares authorized
18,000,000
18,000,000
18,000,000
Number of shares issued and outstanding
10,747,495
10,724,359
10,717,787
Book value per common share
$
15.55
$
15.06
$
14.85
Tangible book value per common share
$
12.75
$
12.25
$
12.03
See Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
Page 3
Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income (Unaudited)
The First Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
For the nine months ended September 30,
For the quarters ended September 30,
2015
2014
2015
2014
Interest income
Interest and fees on loans (includes tax-exempt income of $434,000 as of September 30, 2015 and $452,000 as of September 30, 2014)
$
27,247,000
$
26,120,000
$
9,235,000
$
8,900,000
Interest on deposits with other banks
16,000
4,000
3,000
1,000
Interest and dividends on investments (includes tax-exempt income of $3,891,000 as of September 30, 2015 and $4,498,000 as of September 30, 2014)
10,509,000
12,108,000
3,595,000
3,968,000
Total interest income
37,772,000
38,232,000
12,833,000
12,869,000
Interest expense
Interest on deposits
3,995,000
5,406,000
1,236,000
1,777,000
Interest on borrowed funds
3,486,000
3,276,000
1,086,000
1,088,000
Total interest expense
7,481,000
8,682,000
2,322,000
2,865,000
Net interest income
30,291,000
29,550,000
10,511,000
10,004,000
Provision for loan losses
1,100,000
850,000
200,000
350,000
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
29,191,000
28,700,000
10,311,000
9,654,000
Non-interest income
Investment management and fiduciary income
1,706,000
1,619,000
548,000
517,000
Service charges on deposit accounts
1,801,000
1,899,000
564,000
598,000
Net securities gains
1,396,000
1,145,000
1,000
1,105,000
Mortgage origination and servicing income, net of amortization
1,093,000
610,000
388,000
256,000
Other operating income
3,471,000
3,173,000
1,474,000
1,180,000
Total non-interest income
9,467,000
8,446,000
2,975,000
3,656,000
Non-interest expense
Salaries and employee benefits
10,944,000
11,268,000
3,784,000
4,048,000
Occupancy expense
1,772,000
1,688,000
556,000
517,000
Furniture and equipment expense
2,324,000
2,124,000
772,000
752,000
FDIC insurance premiums
667,000
764,000
221,000
245,000
Amortization of identified intangibles
47,000
245,000
11,000
82,000
Other operating expense
6,198,000
6,256,000
2,363,000
2,158,000
Total non-interest expense
21,952,000
22,345,000
7,707,000
7,802,000
Income before income taxes
16,706,000
14,801,000
5,579,000
5,508,000
Income tax expense
4,269,000
3,518,000
1,391,000
1,400,000
NET INCOME
$
12,437,000
$
11,283,000
$
4,188,000
$
4,108,000
Basic earnings per common share
$
1.17
$
1.06
$
0.39
$
0.39
Diluted earnings per common share
$
1.16
$
1.05
$
0.39
$
0.38
Other comprehensive income (loss) net of tax
Net unrealized gain (loss) on securities available for sale
(204,000
)
7,818,000
1,330,000
(319,000
)
Net unrealized loss on securities transferred from available for sale to held to maturity, net of amortization
(51,000
)
(28,000
)
(15,000
)
(28,000
)
Other comprehensive income (loss)
(255,000
)
7,790,000
1,315,000
(347,000
)
Comprehensive income
$
12,182,000
$
19,073,000
$
5,503,000
$
3,761,000
See Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
Page 4
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity (Unaudited)
The First Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Common stock and
additional paid-in capital
Retained
earnings
Accumulated
other
comprehensive
income (loss)
Total
shareholders'
equity
Shares
Amount
Balance at December 31, 2013
10,671,192
$
58,501,000
$
94,000,000
$
(6,403,000
)
$
146,098,000
Net income
—
—
11,283,000
—
11,283,000
Net unrealized gain on securities available for sale, net of tax
—
—
—
7,818,000
7,818,000
Net unrealized loss on securities transferred from available for sale to held to maturity, net of tax
—
—
—
(28,000
)
(28,000
)
Comprehensive income
—
—
11,283,000
7,790,000
19,073,000
Cash dividends declared ($0.62 per share)
—
—
(6,640,000
)
—
(6,640,000
)
Equity compensation expense
—
317,000
—
—
317,000
Issuance of restricted stock
25,843
—
—
—
—
Proceeds from sale of common stock
20,752
342,000
—
—
342,000
Balance at September 30, 2014
10,717,787
$
59,160,000
$
98,643,000
$
1,387,000
$
159,190,000
Balance at December 31, 2014
10,724,359
$
59,389,000
$
99,816,000
$
2,349,000
$
161,554,000
Net income
—
—
12,437,000
—
12,437,000
Net unrealized loss on securities available for sale, net of tax
—
—
—
(204,000
)
(204,000
)
Net unrealized loss on securities transferred from available for sale to held to maturity, net of tax
—
—
—
(51,000
)
(51,000
)
Comprehensive income
—
—
12,437,000
(255,000
)
12,182,000
Cash dividends declared ($0.65 per share)
—
—
(6,980,000
)
—
(6,980,000
)
Equity compensation expense
—
222,000
—
—
222,000
Payment for repurchase of common stock
(10,138
)
(180,000
)
—
—
(180,000
)
Issuance of restricted stock
13,650
—
—
—
—
Proceeds from sale of common stock
19,624
343,000
—
—
343,000
Balance at September 30, 2015
10,747,495
$
59,774,000
$
105,273,000
$
2,094,000
$
167,141,000
See Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
Page 5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
The First Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
For the nine months ended
September 30, 2015
September 30, 2014
Cash flows from operating activities
Net income
$
12,437,000
$
11,283,000
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities
Depreciation
1,276,000
1,243,000
Change in deferred taxes
334,000
(457,000
)
Provision for loan losses
1,100,000
850,000
Loans originated for resale
(23,504,000
)
(14,827,000
)
Proceeds from sales and transfers of loans
23,794,000
14,823,000
Net gain on sales of loans
(490,000
)
(296,000
)
Net gain on sale or call of securities
(1,396,000
)
(1,145,000
)
Net amortization of premiums on investments
634,000
739,000
Net (gain) loss on sale of other real estate owned
2,000
(28,000
)
Provision for losses on other real estate owned
236,000
376,000
Equity compensation expense
222,000
317,000
Net increase in other assets and accrued interest
(1,486,000
)
(1,847,000
)
Net increase in other liabilities
978,000
1,054,000
Net loss on disposal of premises and equipment
—
5,000
Amortization of investment in limited partnership
199,000
427,000
Net acquisition amortization
47,000
245,000
Net cash provided by operating activities
14,383,000
12,762,000
Cash flows from investing activities
Decrease in interest-bearing deposits in other banks
3,258,000
1,789,000
Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale
35,466,000
15,557,000
Proceeds from maturities, payments and calls of securities available for sale
25,481,000
22,810,000
Proceeds from maturities, payments and calls of securities to be held to maturity
36,367,000
12,255,000
Proceeds from sales of other real estate owned
2,587,000
1,768,000
Purchases of securities available for sale
(91,297,000
)
(909,000
)
Purchases of securities to be held to maturity
(5,644,000
)
(34,881,000
)
Investment in bank-owned life insurance
(10,000,000
)
—
Net increase in loans
(48,310,000
)
(34,337,000
)
Capital expenditures
(371,000
)
(1,590,000
)
Proceeds from disposal of premises and equipment
10,000
1,237,000
Net cash used by investing activities
(52,453,000
)
(16,301,000
)
Cash flows from financing activities
Net increase in demand, savings, and money market accounts
91,740,000
98,266,000
Net decrease in certificates of deposit
(58,194,000
)
(67,343,000
)
Net increase (decrease) in short-term borrowings
2,453,000
(15,489,000
)
Advances on long-term borrowings
55,000,000
—
Repayment on long-term borrowings
(40,000,000
)
(5,000,000
)
Payment to repurchase common stock
(180,000
)
—
Proceeds from sale of common stock
343,000
342,000
Dividends paid
(6,980,000
)
(6,640,000
)
Net cash provided by financing activities
44,182,000
4,136,000
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
6,112,000
597,000
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
13,057,000
16,570,000
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$
19,169,000
$
17,167,000
Interest paid
$
7,564,000
$
8,705,000
Income taxes paid
2,915,000
3,555,000
Non-cash transactions
Net transfer from loans to other real estate owned
$
956,000
$
1,866,000
Transfer of securities from available for sale to held to maturity
$
—
$
89,757,000
Page 6
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
The First Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Note 1 – Basis of Presentation
The First Bancorp, Inc. ("the Company") is a financial holding company that owns all of the common stock of The First, N.A. ("the Bank"). The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP") for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of Management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. All significant intercompany transactions and balances are eliminated in consolidation. The income reported for the
2015
period is not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending
December 31, 2015
. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and notes included in the Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2014
.
Subsequent Events
Events occurring subsequent to
September 30, 2015
, have been evaluated as to their potential impact to the financial statements.
Note 2 – Investment Securities
The following table summarizes the amortized cost and estimated fair value of investment securities at
September 30, 2015
:
Amortized
Cost
Unrealized Gains
Unrealized Losses
Fair Value (Estimated)
Securities available for sale
Mortgage-backed securities
$
184,865,000
$
2,921,000
$
(276,000
)
$
187,510,000
State and political subdivisions
24,372,000
1,104,000
(186,000
)
25,290,000
Other equity securities
3,129,000
40,000
(36,000
)
3,133,000
$
212,366,000
$
4,065,000
$
(498,000
)
$
215,933,000
Securities to be held to maturity
U.S. Government-sponsored agencies
$
75,991,000
$
22,000
$
(1,571,000
)
$
74,442,000
Mortgage-backed securities
45,287,000
1,744,000
(53,000
)
46,978,000
State and political subdivisions
123,744,000
3,031,000
(151,000
)
126,624,000
Corporate securities
300,000
—
—
300,000
$
245,322,000
$
4,797,000
$
(1,775,000
)
$
248,344,000
Restricted equity securities
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock
$
12,875,000
$
—
$
—
$
12,875,000
Federal Reserve Bank Stock
1,037,000
—
—
1,037,000
$
13,912,000
$
—
$
—
$
13,912,000
Page 7
The following table summarizes the amortized cost and estimated fair value of investment securities at
December 31, 2014
:
Amortized
Cost
Unrealized Gains
Unrealized Losses
Fair Value (Estimated)
Securities available for sale
Mortgage-backed securities
$
149,796,000
$
2,637,000
$
(578,000
)
$
151,855,000
State and political subdivisions
29,094,000
1,865,000
(104,000
)
30,855,000
Other equity securities
2,490,000
65,000
(4,000
)
2,551,000
$
181,380,000
$
4,567,000
$
(686,000
)
$
185,261,000
Securities to be held to maturity
U.S. Government-sponsored agencies
$
92,341,000
$
54,000
$
(2,066,000
)
$
90,329,000
Mortgage-backed securities
57,003,000
1,830,000
(116,000
)
58,717,000
State and political subdivisions
126,275,000
4,114,000
(31,000
)
130,358,000
Corporate securities
300,000
—
—
300,000
$
275,919,000
$
5,998,000
$
(2,213,000
)
$
279,704,000
Restricted equity securities
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock
$
12,875,000
$
—
$
—
$
12,875,000
Federal Reserve Bank Stock
1,037,000
—
—
1,037,000
$
13,912,000
$
—
$
—
$
13,912,000
The following table summarizes the amortized cost and estimated fair value of investment securities at
September 30, 2014
:
Amortized
Cost
Unrealized Gains
Unrealized Losses
Fair Value (Estimated)
Securities available for sale
Mortgage-backed securities
$
157,420,000
$
2,109,000
$
(1,779,000
)
$
157,750,000
State and political subdivisions
29,099,000
1,785,000
(265,000
)
30,619,000
Other equity securities
2,514,000
53,000
(16,000
)
2,551,000
$
189,033,000
$
3,947,000
$
(2,060,000
)
$
190,920,000
Securities to be held to maturity
U.S. Government-sponsored agencies
$
92,332,000
$
2,000
$
(5,271,000
)
$
87,063,000
Mortgage-backed securities
61,138,000
1,695,000
(587,000
)
62,246,000
State and political subdivisions
127,970,000
3,238,000
(38,000
)
131,170,000
Corporate securities
300,000
—
—
300,000
$
281,740,000
$
4,935,000
$
(5,896,000
)
$
280,779,000
Restricted equity securities
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock
$
12,875,000
$
—
$
—
$
12,875,000
Federal Reserve Bank Stock
1,037,000
—
—
1,037,000
$
13,912,000
$
—
$
—
$
13,912,000
Page 8
The following table summarizes the contractual maturities of investment securities at
September 30, 2015
:
Securities available for sale
Securities to be held to maturity
Amortized
Cost
Fair Value (Estimated)
Amortized
Cost
Fair Value (Estimated)
Due in 1 year or less
$
926,000
$
937,000
$
1,362,000
$
1,378,000
Due in 1 to 5 years
8,867,000
9,077,000
6,861,000
7,140,000
Due in 5 to 10 years
9,459,000
9,872,000
49,095,000
50,778,000
Due after 10 years
189,985,000
192,914,000
188,004,000
189,048,000
Equity securities
3,129,000
3,133,000
—
—
$
212,366,000
$
215,933,000
$
245,322,000
$
248,344,000
The following table summarizes the contractual maturities of investment securities at
December 31, 2014
:
Securities available for sale
Securities to be held to maturity
Amortized
Cost
Fair Value (Estimated)
Amortized
Cost
Fair Value (Estimated)
Due in 1 year or less
$
2,309,000
$
2,329,000
$
1,693,000
$
1,713,000
Due in 1 to 5 years
15,200,000
15,499,000
8,467,000
8,702,000
Due in 5 to 10 years
18,547,000
19,124,000
50,629,000
52,717,000
Due after 10 years
142,834,000
145,758,000
215,130,000
216,572,000
Equity securities
2,490,000
2,551,000
—
—
$
181,380,000
$
185,261,000
$
275,919,000
$
279,704,000
The following table summarizes the contractual maturities of investment securities at
September 30, 2014
:
Securities available for sale
Securities to be held to maturity
Amortized
Cost
Fair Value (Estimated)
Amortized
Cost
Fair Value (Estimated)
Due in 1 year or less
$
2,502,000
$
2,533,000
$
1,778,000
$
1,792,000
Due in 1 to 5 years
16,076,000
16,399,000
9,380,000
9,669,000
Due in 5 to 10 years
17,710,000
17,991,000
51,620,000
53,271,000
Due after 10 years
150,231,000
151,446,000
218,962,000
216,047,000
Equity securities
2,514,000
2,551,000
—
—
$
189,033,000
$
190,920,000
$
281,740,000
$
280,779,000
At
September 30, 2015
, securities with a fair value of
$221,072,000
were pledged to secure public deposits, repurchase agreements, and for other purposes as required by law. This compares to securities with a fair value of
$164,919,000
as of
December 31, 2014
and
$181,441,000
at
September 30, 2014
, pledged for the same purposes.
Page 9
Gains and losses on the sale of securities available for sale are computed by subtracting the amortized cost at the time of sale from the security's selling price, net of accrued interest to be received. The following table shows securities gains and losses for the
nine months
and quarters ended
September 30, 2015
and
2014
:
For the nine months ended September 30,
For the quarters ended September 30,
2015
2014
2015
2014
Proceeds from sales of securities
$
35,466,000
$
15,557,000
$
1,000
$
15,557,000
Gross realized gains
1,396,000
1,145,000
1,000
1,105,000
Gross realized losses
—
—
—
—
Net gain
$
1,396,000
$
1,145,000
$
1,000
$
1,105,000
Related income taxes
$
489,000
$
401,000
$
—
$
387,000
Management reviews securities with unrealized losses for other than temporary impairment. As of
September 30, 2015
, there were
88
securities with unrealized losses held in the Company's portfolio. These securities were temporarily impaired as a result of changes in interest rates reducing their fair value, of which
14
had been temporarily impaired for
12
months or more. At the present time, there have been no material changes in the credit quality of these securities resulting in other than temporary impairment, and in Management's opinion, no additional write-down for other-than-temporary impairment is warranted. Information regarding securities temporarily impaired as of
September 30, 2015
is summarized below:
Less than 12 months
12 months or more
Total
Fair Value (Estimated)
Unrealized Losses
Fair Value (Estimated)
Unrealized Losses
Fair Value (Estimated)
Unrealized Losses
U.S. Government-sponsored agencies
$
46,621,000
$
(1,015,000
)
$
17,444,000
$
(556,000
)
$
64,065,000
$
(1,571,000
)
Mortgage-backed securities
30,713,000
(266,000
)
989,000
(63,000
)
31,702,000
(329,000
)
State and political subdivisions
14,417,000
(207,000
)
2,374,000
(130,000
)
16,791,000
(337,000
)
Other equity securities
264,000
(34,000
)
51,000
(2,000
)
315,000
(36,000
)
$
92,015,000
$
(1,522,000
)
$
20,858,000
$
(751,000
)
$
112,873,000
$
(2,273,000
)
As of
December 31, 2014
, there were
56
securities with unrealized losses held in the Company's portfolio. These securities were temporarily impaired as a result of changes in interest rates reducing their fair value, of which
36
had been temporarily impaired for
12 months
or more. Information regarding securities temporarily impaired as of
December 31, 2014
is summarized below:
Less than 12 months
12 months or more
Total
Fair Value (Estimated)
Unrealized Losses
Fair Value (Estimated)
Unrealized Losses
Fair Value (Estimated)
Unrealized Losses
U.S. Government-sponsored agencies
$
—
$
—
$
79,444,000
$
(2,066,000
)
$
79,444,000
$
(2,066,000
)
Mortgage-backed securities
13,878,000
(40,000
)
29,182,000
(654,000
)
43,060,000
(694,000
)
State and political subdivisions
3,352,000
(31,000
)
3,017,000
(104,000
)
6,369,000
(135,000
)
Other equity securities
68,000
(3,000
)
51,000
(1,000
)
119,000
(4,000
)
$
17,298,000
$
(74,000
)
$
111,694,000
$
(2,825,000
)
$
128,992,000
$
(2,899,000
)
Page 10
As of
September 30, 2014
, there were
76
securities with unrealized losses held in the Company's portfolio. These securities were temporarily impaired as a result of changes in interest rates reducing their fair value, of which
47
had been temporarily impaired for
12 months
or more. Information regarding securities temporarily impaired as of
September 30, 2014
is summarized below:
Less than 12 months
12 months or more
Total
Fair Value (Estimated)
Unrealized Losses
Fair Value (Estimated)
Unrealized Losses
Fair Value (Estimated)
Unrealized Losses
U.S. Government-sponsored agencies
$
4,985,000
$
(15,000
)
$
81,253,000
$
(5,256,000
)
$
86,238,000
$
(5,271,000
)
Mortgage-backed securities
52,644,000
(736,000
)
32,009,000
(1,630,000
)
84,653,000
(2,366,000
)
State and political subdivisions
3,880,000
(27,000
)
5,878,000
(276,000
)
9,758,000
(303,000
)
Other equity securities
142,000
(15,000
)
52,000
(1,000
)
194,000
(16,000
)
$
61,651,000
$
(793,000
)
$
119,192,000
$
(7,163,000
)
$
180,843,000
$
(7,956,000
)
During the third quarter of 2014, the Company transferred securities with a total amortized cost of
$89,780,000
with a corresponding fair value of
$89,757,000
from available for sale to held to maturity. The net unrealized loss, net of taxes, on these securities at the date of the transfer was
$15,000
. The net unrealized holding loss at the time of transfer continues to be reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax and is amortized over the remaining lives of the securities as an adjustment of the yield. The amortization of the net unrealized loss reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) will offset the effect on interest income of the discount for the transferred securities. The remaining unamortized balance of the net unrealized losses for the securities transferred from available for sale to held to maturity was
$99,000
at
September 30, 2015
. These securities were transferred as a part of the Company's overall investment and balance sheet strategies.
The Bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank ("FHLB") of Boston, a cooperatively owned wholesale bank for housing and finance in the
six
New England States. As a requirement of membership in the FHLB, the Bank must own a minimum required amount of FHLB stock, calculated periodically based primarily on its level of borrowings from the FHLB. The Bank uses the FHLB for much of its wholesale funding needs. As of
September 30, 2015
, and
2014
, and
December 31, 2014
, the Bank's investment in FHLB stock totaled
$12,875,000
. FHLB stock is a non-marketable equity security and therefore is reported at cost, which equals par value. The Company periodically evaluates its investment in FHLB stock for impairment based on, among other factors, the capital adequacy of the FHLB and its overall financial condition. No impairment losses have been recorded through
September 30, 2015
. The Bank will continue to monitor its investment in FHLB stock.
Note 3 – Loans
The following table shows the composition of the Company's loan portfolio as of
September 30, 2015
and
2014
and at
December 31, 2014
:
September 30, 2015
December 31, 2014
September 30, 2014
Commercial
Real estate
$
268,741,000
27.9
%
$
242,311,000
26.4
%
$
243,936,000
26.8
%
Construction
23,624,000
2.5
%
30,932,000
3.4
%
26,954,000
3.0
%
Other
119,097,000
12.4
%
104,531,000
11.4
%
97,651,000
10.8
%
Municipal
21,377,000
2.2
%
20,424,000
2.2
%
20,722,000
2.3
%
Residential
Term
385,145,000
39.9
%
384,032,000
41.9
%
386,768,000
42.6
%
Construction
12,029,000
1.2
%
12,160,000
1.3
%
12,253,000
1.3
%
Home equity line of credit
109,390,000
11.4
%
103,521,000
11.3
%
101,094,000
11.1
%
Consumer
23,748,000
2.5
%
19,653,000
2.1
%
18,737,000
2.1
%
Total
$
963,151,000
100.0
%
$
917,564,000
100.0
%
$
908,115,000
100.0
%
Loan balances include net deferred loan costs of
$3,452,000
as of
September 30, 2015
,
$2,729,000
as of
December 31, 2014
, and
$2,568,000
as of
September 30, 2014
. Pursuant to collateral agreements, qualifying first mortgage loans, which
Page 11
totaled
$281,925,000
at
September 30, 2015
,
$266,716,000
at
December 31, 2014
, and
$279,150,000
at
September 30, 2014
, were used to collateralize borrowings from the FHLB. In addition, commercial, construction and home equity loans totaling
$251,937,000
at
September 30, 2015
,
$240,943,000
at
December 31, 2014
, and
$245,950,000
at
September 30, 2014
, were used to collateralize a standby line of credit at the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston that is currently unused.
For all loan classes, loans over 30 days past due are considered delinquent. Information on the past-due status of loans by class of financing receivable as of
September 30, 2015
, is presented in the following table:
30-59 Days
Past Due
60-89 Days
Past Due
90+ Days
Past Due
All
Past Due
Current
Total
90+ Days
& Accruing
Commercial
Real estate
$
193,000
$
863,000
—
$
1,056,000
$
267,685,000
$
268,741,000
$
—
Construction
—
31,000
208,000
239,000
23,385,000
23,624,000
—
Other
10,000
—
—
10,000
119,087,000
119,097,000
—
Municipal
—
—
—
—
21,377,000
21,377,000
—
Residential
Term
982,000
3,012,000
2,956,000
6,950,000
378,195,000
385,145,000
—
Construction
—
—
—
—
12,029,000
12,029,000
—
Home equity line of credit
577,000
—
618,000
1,195,000
108,195,000
109,390,000
—
Consumer
146,000
52,000
110,000
308,000
23,440,000
23,748,000
109,000
Total
$
1,908,000
$
3,958,000
$
3,892,000
$
9,758,000
$
953,393,000
$
963,151,000
$
109,000
Information on the past-due status of loans by class of financing receivable as of
December 31, 2014
, is presented in the following table:
30-59 Days
Past Due
60-89 Days
Past Due
90+ Days
Past Due
All
Past Due
Current
Total
90+ Days
& Accruing
Commercial
Real estate
$
346,000
$
107,000
$
407,000
$
860,000
$
241,451,000
$
242,311,000
$
—
Construction
—
41,000
208,000
249,000
30,683,000
30,932,000
—
Other
336,000
543,000
314,000
1,193,000
103,338,000
104,531,000
—
Municipal
—
—
—
—
20,424,000
20,424,000
—
Residential
Term
1,140,000
2,118,000
3,745,000
7,003,000
377,029,000
384,032,000
101,000
Construction
—
—
—
—
12,160,000
12,160,000
—
Home equity line of credit
621,000
769,000
732,000
2,122,000
101,399,000
103,521,000
—
Consumer
303,000
53,000
80,000
436,000
19,217,000
19,653,000
80,000
Total
$
2,746,000
$
3,631,000
$
5,486,000
$
11,863,000
$
905,701,000
$
917,564,000
$
181,000
Page 12
Information on the past-due status of loans by class of financing receivable as of
September 30, 2014
, is presented in the following table:
30-59 Days
Past Due
60-89 Days
Past Due
90+ Days
Past Due
All
Past Due
Current
Total
90+ Days
& Accruing
Commercial
Real estate
$
—
$
116,000
$
1,220,000
$
1,336,000
$
242,600,000
$
243,936,000
$
—
Construction
—
—
208,000
208,000
26,746,000
26,954,000
—
Other
109,000
34,000
476,000
619,000
97,032,000
97,651,000
—
Municipal
—
—
—
—
20,722,000
20,722,000
—
Residential
Term
725,000
2,317,000
3,868,000
6,910,000
379,858,000
386,768,000
380,000
Construction
—
—
—
—
12,253,000
12,253,000
—
Home equity line of credit
603,000
107,000
649,000
1,359,000
99,735,000
101,094,000
—
Consumer
49,000
68,000
71,000
188,000
18,549,000
18,737,000
72,000
Total
$
1,486,000
$
2,642,000
$
6,492,000
$
10,620,000
$
897,495,000
$
908,115,000
$
452,000
For all classes, loans are placed on non-accrual status when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement or when principal and interest is 90 days or more past due unless the loan is both well secured and in the process of collection (in which case the loan may continue to accrue interest in spite of its past due status). A loan is "well secured" if it is secured (1) by collateral in the form of liens on or pledges of real or personal property, including securities, that have a realizable value sufficient to discharge the debt (including accrued interest) in full, or (2) by the guarantee of a financially responsible party. A loan is "in the process of collection" if collection of the loan is proceeding in due course either (1) through legal action, including judgment enforcement procedures, or, (2) in appropriate circumstances, through collection efforts not involving legal action which are reasonably expected to result in repayment of the debt or in its restoration to a current status in the near future.
Cash payments received on non-accrual loans, which are included in impaired loans, are applied to reduce the loan's principal balance until the remaining principal balance is deemed collectible, after which interest is recognized when collected. As a general rule, a loan may be restored to accrual status when payments are current for a substantial period of time, generally six months, and repayment of the remaining contractual amounts is expected or when it otherwise becomes well secured and in the process of collection. Information on nonaccrual loans as of
September 30, 2015
and
2014
and at
December 31, 2014
is presented in the following table:
September 30, 2015
December 31, 2014
September 30, 2014
Commercial
Real estate
$
1,220,000
$
2,088,000
$
2,866,000
Construction
208,000
208,000
208,000
Other
114,000
935,000
1,800,000
Municipal
—
—
—
Residential
Term
5,491,000
6,421,000
6,166,000
Construction
—
—
—
Home equity line of credit
948,000
832,000
759,000
Consumer
—
26,000
26,000
Total
$
7,981,000
$
10,510,000
$
11,825,000
Impaired loans include troubled debt restructured and loans placed on non-accrual. These loans are measured at the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan's effective interest rate or at the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. If the measure of an impaired loan is lower than the recorded investment in the loan and estimated selling costs, a specific reserve is established for the difference, or, in certain situations, if the measure of an impaired loan is lower than the recorded investment in the loan and estimated selling costs, the difference is written off.
Page 13
A breakdown of impaired loans by class of financing receivable as of and for the period ended
September 30, 2015
, is presented in the following table:
For the nine months ended September 30, 2015
For the quarter ended September 30, 2015
Recorded Investment
Unpaid Principal Balance
Related Allowance
Average Recorded Investment
Recognized Interest Income
Average Recorded Investment
Recognized Interest Income
With No Related Allowance
Commercial
Real estate
$
7,976,000
$
8,444,000
$
—
$
9,410,000
$
247,000
$
8,310,000
$
65,000
Construction
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Other
1,660,000
1,728,000
—
2,077,000
76,000
1,698,000
34,000
Municipal
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Residential
Term
10,096,000
11,006,000
—
10,482,000
268,000
9,852,000
95,000
Construction
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Home equity line of credit
1,484,000
2,135,000
—
1,383,000
36,000
1,498,000
21,000
Consumer
—
—
—
56,000
3,000
62,000
—
$
21,216,000
$
23,313,000
$
—
$
23,408,000
$
630,000
$
21,420,000
$
215,000
With an Allowance Recorded
Commercial
Real estate
$
3,252,000
$
3,332,000
$
71,000
$
2,969,000
$
108,000
$
3,294,000
$
37,000
Construction
996,000
996,000
282,000
1,206,000
38,000
996,000
13,000
Other
76,000
83,000
8,000
317,000
4,000
152,000
—
Municipal
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Residential
Term
5,180,000
5,485,000
435,000
5,375,000
166,000
5,429,000
46,000
Construction
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Home equity line of credit
66,000
67,000
30,000
227,000
2,000
67,000
—
Consumer
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
$
9,570,000
$
9,963,000
$
826,000
$
10,094,000
$
318,000
$
9,938,000
$
96,000
Total
Commercial
Real estate
$
11,228,000
$
11,776,000
$
71,000
$
12,379,000
$
355,000
$
11,604,000
$
102,000
Construction
996,000
996,000
282,000
1,206,000
38,000
996,000
13,000
Other
1,736,000
1,811,000
8,000
2,394,000
80,000
1,850,000
34,000
Municipal
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Residential
Term
15,276,000
16,491,000
435,000
15,857,000
434,000
15,281,000
141,000
Construction
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Home equity line of credit
1,550,000
2,202,000
30,000
1,610,000
38,000
1,565,000
21,000
Consumer
—
—
—
56,000
3,000
62,000
—
$
30,786,000
$
33,276,000
$
826,000
$
33,502,000
$
948,000
$
31,358,000
$
311,000
Substantially all interest income recognized on impaired loans for all classes of financing receivables was recognized on a cash basis as received.
Page 14
A breakdown of impaired loans by class of financing receivable as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2014
, is presented in the following table:
Recorded Investment
Unpaid Principal Balance
Related Allowance
Average Recorded Investment
Recognized Interest Income
With No Related Allowance
Commercial
Real estate
$
11,687,000
$
12,423,000
$
—
$
11,080,000
$
488,000
Construction
—
—
—
30,000
—
Other
2,616,000
3,407,000
—
3,853,000
156,000
Municipal
—
—
—
—
—
Residential
Term
10,820,000
11,824,000
—
10,505,000
402,000
Construction
—
—
—
—
—
Home equity line of credit
1,164,000
1,395,000
—
1,447,000
29,000
Consumer
26,000
28,000
—
11,000
3,000
$
26,313,000
$
29,077,000
$
—
$
26,926,000
$
1,078,000
With an Allowance Recorded
Commercial
Real estate
$
1,617,000
$
1,789,000
$
346,000
$
3,040,000
$
62,000
Construction
1,380,000
1,380,000
413,000
1,279,000
56,000
Other
326,000
338,000
129,000
1,103,000
13,000
Municipal
—
—
—
—
—
Residential
Term
5,303,000
5,513,000
519,000
5,738,000
239,000
Construction
—
—
—
—
—
Home equity line of credit
923,000
929,000
396,000
318,000
17,000
Consumer
—
—
—
—
—
$
9,549,000
$
9,949,000
$
1,803,000
$
11,478,000
$
387,000
Total
Commercial
Real estate
$
13,304,000
$
14,212,000
$
346,000
$
14,120,000
$
550,000
Construction
1,380,000
1,380,000
413,000
1,309,000
56,000
Other
2,942,000
3,745,000
129,000
4,956,000
169,000
Municipal
—
—
—
—
—
Residential
Term
16,123,000
17,337,000
519,000
16,243,000
641,000
Construction
—
—
—
—
—
Home equity line of credit
2,087,000
2,324,000
396,000
1,765,000
46,000
Consumer
26,000
28,000
—
11,000
3,000
$
35,862,000
$
39,026,000
$
1,803,000
$
38,404,000
$
1,465,000
Page 15
A breakdown of impaired loans by class of financing receivable as of and for the period ended
September 30, 2014
, is presented in the following table:
For the nine months ended September 30, 2014
For the quarter ended September 30, 2014
Recorded Investment
Unpaid Principal Balance
Related Allowance
Average Recorded Investment
Recognized Interest Income
Average Recorded Investment
Recognized Interest Income
With No Related Allowance
Commercial
Real estate
$
12,509,000
$
13,064,000
$
—
$
10,700,000
$
362,000
$
11,183,000
$
123,000
Construction
—
—
—
40,000
—
—
—
Other
3,029,000
3,255,000
—
4,221,000
125,000
3,071,000
66,000
Municipal
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Residential
Term
9,777,000
10,488,000
—
10,478,000
286,000
9,746,000
107,000
Construction
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Home equity line of credit
1,134,000
1,366,000
—
1,549,000
21,000
1,140,000
7,000
Consumer
26,000
28,000
—
6,000
2,000
18,000
2,000
$
26,475,000
$
28,201,000
$
—
$
26,994,000
$
796,000
$
25,158,000
$
305,000
With an Allowance Recorded
Commercial
Real estate
$
1,909,000
$
2,071,000
$
1,041,000
$
3,517,000
$
67,000
$
3,354,000
$
24,000
Construction
1,380,000
1,380,000
411,000
1,245,000
42,000
1,455,000
14,000
Other
863,000
953,000
660,000
1,252,000
38,000
1,028,000
29,000
Municipal
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Residential
Term
6,119,000
6,351,000
661,000
5,831,000
193,000
5,793,000
62,000
Construction
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Home equity line of credit
250,000
255,000
70,000
266,000
2,000
276,000
1,000
Consumer
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
$
10,521,000
$
11,010,000
$
2,843,000
$
12,111,000
$
342,000
$
11,906,000
$
130,000
Total
Commercial
Real estate
$
14,418,000
$
15,135,000
$
1,041,000
$
14,217,000
$
429,000
$
14,537,000
$
147,000
Construction
1,380,000
1,380,000
411,000
1,285,000
42,000
1,455,000
14,000
Other
3,892,000
4,208,000
660,000
5,473,000
163,000
4,099,000
95,000
Municipal
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Residential
Term
15,896,000
16,839,000
661,000
16,309,000
479,000
15,539,000
169,000
Construction
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Home equity line of credit
1,384,000
1,621,000
70,000
1,815,000
23,000
1,416,000
8,000
Consumer
26,000
28,000
—
6,000
2,000
18,000
2,000
$
36,996,000
$
39,211,000
$
2,843,000
$
39,105,000
$
1,138,000
$
37,064,000
$
435,000
Page 16
Troubled Debt Restructured
A troubled debt restructured ("TDR") constitutes a restructuring of debt if the Company, for economic or legal reasons related to the borrower's financial difficulties, grants a concession to the borrower that it would not otherwise consider. To determine whether or not a loan should be classified as a TDR, Management evaluates a loan based upon the following criteria:
•
The borrower demonstrates financial difficulty; common indicators include past due status with bank obligations, substandard credit bureau reports, or an inability to refinance with another lender, and
•
The Company has granted a concession; common concession types include maturity date extension, interest rate adjustments to below market pricing, and deferment of payments.
As of
September 30, 2015
, the Company had
88
loans with a value of
$24,715,000
that have been classified as TDRs. This compares to
94
loans with a value of
$27,214,000
and
96
loans with a value of
$27,877,000
classified as TDRs as of
December 31, 2014
and
September 30, 2014
, respectively. The impairment carried as a specific reserve in the allowance for loan losses is calculated by present valuing the expected cash flows on the loan at the original interest rate, or, for collateral-dependent loans, using the fair value of the collateral less costs to sell.
The following table shows TDRs by class and the specific reserve as of
September 30, 2015
:
Number of Loans
Balance
Specific Reserves
Commercial
Real estate
16
$
10,696,000
$
69,000
Construction
1
788,000
76,000
Other
13
1,621,000
1,000
Municipal
—
—
—
Residential
Term
53
10,837,000
378,000
Construction
—
—
—
Home equity line of credit
5
773,000
—
Consumer
—
—
—
88
$
24,715,000
$
524,000
The following table shows TDRs by class and the specific reserve as of
December 31, 2014
:
Number of Loans
Balance
Specific Reserves
Commercial
Real estate
19
$
12,282,000
$
267,000
Construction
1
1,172,000
207,000
Other
15
2,007,000
—
Municipal
—
—
—
Residential
Term
54
10,932,000
373,000
Construction
—
—
—
Home equity line of credit
5
821,000
21,000
Consumer
—
—
—
94
$
27,214,000
$
868,000
Page 17
The following table shows TDRs by class and the specific reserve as of
September 30, 2014
:
Number of Loans
Balance
Specific Reserves
Commercial
Real estate
20
$
12,809,000
$
696,000
Construction
1
1,172,000
204,000
Other
16
2,092,000
—
Municipal
—
—
—
Residential
Term
54
10,978,000
390,000
Construction
—
—
—
Home equity line of credit
5
826,000
21,000
Consumer
—
—
—
96
$
27,877,000
$
1,311,000
As of
September 30, 2015
,
10
of the loans classified as TDRs with a total balance of
$1,593,000
were more than
30
days past due. None of these loans had been placed on TDR status in the previous 12 months. The following table shows these TDRs by class and the associated specific reserves included in the allowance for loan losses as of
September 30, 2015
:
Number of Loans
Balance
Specific Reserves
Commercial
Real estate
—
$
—
$
—
Construction
—
—
—
Other
—
—
—
Municipal
—
—
—
Residential
Term
10
1,593,000
96,000
Construction
—
—
—
Home equity line of credit
—
—
—
Consumer
—
—
—
10
$
1,593,000
$
96,000
Page 18
As of
September 30, 2014
,
11
of the loans classified as TDRs with a total balance of
$1,987,000
were more than
30
days past due. Of these loans,
three
loans with an outstanding balance of
$416,000
had been placed on TDR status in the previous 12 months. The following table shows these TDRs by class and the associated specific reserves included in the allowance for loan losses as of
September 30, 2014
:
Number of Loans
Balance
Specific Reserves
Commercial
Real estate
1
$
519,000
$
519,000
Construction
—
—
—
Other
—
—
—
Municipal
—
—
—
Residential
Term
9
1,267,000
48,000
Construction
—
—
—
Home equity line of credit
1
201,000
21,000
Consumer
—
—
—
11
$
1,987,000
$
588,000
For the
nine months ended September 30, 2015
,
one
loan was placed on TDR status with a post-modification outstanding balance of
$108,000
. This compares to
six
loans placed on TDR status with a post-modification outstanding balance of
$832,000
for the
nine months ended September 30, 2014
. These were considered TDRs because concessions had been granted to borrowers experiencing financial difficulties. Concessions include reductions in interest rates, principal and/or interest forbearance, payment extensions, or combinations thereof.
The following table shows loans placed on TDR status in the
nine months ended September 30, 2015
, by class of loan and the associated specific reserve included in the allowance for loan losses as of
September 30, 2015
:
For the nine months ended September 30, 2015
Number of Loans
Pre-Modification
Outstanding
Recorded Investment
Post-Modification Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
Specific Reserves
Commercial
Real estate
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
Construction
—
—
—
—
Other
—
—
—
—
Municipal
—
—
—
—
Residential
Term
1
111,000
108,000
—
Construction
—
—
—
—
Home equity line of credit
—
—
—
—
Consumer
—
—
—
—
1
$
111,000
$
108,000
$
—
Page 19
The following table shows loans placed on TDR status in the
nine months ended September 30, 2014
, by class of loan and the associated specific reserve included in the allowance for loan losses as of
September 30, 2014
:
For the nine months ended September 30, 2014
Number of Loans
Pre-Modification
Outstanding
Recorded Investment
Post-Modification Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
Specific Reserves
Commercial
Real estate
2
$
290,000
$
290,000
$
—
Construction
—
—
—
—
Other
—
—
—
—
Municipal
—
—
—
—
Residential
Term
4
602,000
542,000
23,000
Construction
—
—
—
—
Home equity line of credit
—
—
—
—
Consumer
—
—
—
—
6
$
892,000
$
832,000
$
23,000
For the quarter ended
September 30, 2015
one
loan was placed on TDR status with a post-modification outstanding balance of
$108,000
. This compares to
three
loans placed on TDR status with a post-modification outstanding balance of
$545,000
for the quarter ended
September 30, 2014
. These were considered TDRs because concessions had been granted to borrowers experiencing financial difficulties. Concessions include reductions in interest rates, principal and/or interest forbearance, payment extensions, or combinations thereof.
The following table shows loans placed on TDR status in the three months ended September 30, 2015, by class of loan and the associated specific reserve included in the allowance for loan losses as of September 30, 2015:
For the quarter ended September 30, 2015
Number of Loans
Pre-Modification
Outstanding
Recorded Investment
Post-Modification Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
Specific Reserves
Commercial
Real estate
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
Construction
—
—
—
—
Other
—
—
—
—
Municipal
—
—
—
—
Residential
Term
1
111,000
108,000
—
Construction
—
—
—
—
Home equity line of credit
—
—
—
—
Consumer
—
—
—
—
1
$
111,000
$
108,000
$
—
Page 20
The following table shows loans placed on TDR status in the three months ended September 30, 2014, by class of loan and
the associated specific reserve included in the allowance for loan losses as of September 30, 2014:
For the quarter ended September 30, 2014
Number of Loans
Pre-Modification
Outstanding
Recorded Investment
Post-Modification Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
Specific Reserves
Commercial
Real estate
2
$290,000
$290,000
$—
Construction
—
—
—
—
Other
—
—
—
—
Municipal
—
—
—
—
Residential
Term
1
255,000
255,000
8,000
Construction
—
—
—
—
Home equity line of credit
—
—
—
—
Consumer
—
—
—
—
3
$545,000
$545,000
$8,000
As of
September 30, 2015
, Management is aware of
eight
loans classified as TDRs that are involved in bankruptcy with an outstanding balance of
$1,153,000
. There were also
14
loans with an outstanding balance of
$1,913,000
that were classified as TDRs and on non-accrual status.
Three
loans with an outstanding balance of
$265,000
, that were classified as TDRs, were in the process of foreclosure.
Residential Mortgage Loans in Process of Foreclosure
As of
September 30, 2015
, there were
18
mortgage loans collateralized by residential real estate in the process of foreclosure with a total balance of $
2,038,000
.
Note 4. Allowance for Loan Losses
The Company provides for loan losses through the establishment of an allowance for loan losses which represents an estimated reserve for existing losses in the loan portfolio. A systematic methodology is used for determining the allowance that includes a quarterly review process, risk rating changes, and adjustments to the allowance. The loan portfolio is classified in eight classes and credit risk is evaluated separately in each class. The appropriate level of the allowance is evaluated continually based on a review of significant loans, with a particular emphasis on nonaccruing, past due, and other loans that may require special attention. Other factors include general conditions in local and national economies; loan portfolio composition and asset quality indicators; and internal factors such as changes in underwriting policies, credit administration practices, experience, ability and depth of lending management, among others. The allowance consists of four elements: (1) specific reserves for loans evaluated individually for impairment; (2) general reserves for each portfolio segment based on historical loan loss experience, (3) qualitative reserves judgmentally adjusted for local and national economic conditions, concentrations, portfolio composition, volume and severity of delinquencies and nonaccrual loans, trends of criticized and classified loans, changes in credit policies and underwriting standards, credit administration practices, and other factors as applicable for each portfolio segment; and (4) unallocated reserves. All outstanding loans are considered in evaluating the appropriateness of the allowance.
Page 21
A breakdown of the allowance for loan losses as of
September 30, 2015
,
December 31, 2014
, and
September 30, 2014
, by class of financing receivable and allowance element, is presented in the following tables:
As of September 30, 2015
Specific Reserves on Loans Evaluated Individually for Impairment
General Reserves on Loans Based on Historical Loss Experience
Reserves for Qualitative Factors
Unallocated
Reserves
Total Reserves
Commercial
Real estate
$
71,000
$
1,094,000
$
1,986,000
$
—
$
3,151,000
Construction
282,000
98,000
178,000
—
558,000
Other
8,000
486,000
882,000
—
1,376,000
Municipal
—
—
16,000
—
16,000
Residential
Term
435,000
300,000
430,000
—
1,165,000
Construction
—
9,000
13,000
—
22,000
Home equity line of credit
30,000
530,000
341,000
—
901,000
Consumer
—
346,000
216,000
—
562,000
Unallocated
—
—
—
1,926,000
1,926,000
$
826,000
$
2,863,000
$
4,062,000
$
1,926,000
$
9,677,000
As of December 31, 2014
Specific Reserves on Loans Evaluated Individually for Impairment
General Reserves on Loans Based on Historical Loss Experience
Reserves for Qualitative Factors
Unallocated
Reserves
Total Reserves
Commercial
Real estate
$
346,000
$
1,444,000
$
1,742,000
$
—
$
3,532,000
Construction
413,000
186,000
224,000
—
823,000
Other
129,000
624,000
752,000
—
1,505,000
Municipal
—
—
15,000
—
15,000
Residential
Term
519,000
297,000
369,000
—
1,185,000
Construction
—
9,000
11,000
—
20,000
Home equity line of credit
396,000
376,000
288,000
—
1,060,000
Consumer
—
346,000
196,000
—
542,000
Unallocated
—
—
—
1,662,000
1,662,000
$
1,803,000
$
3,282,000
$
3,597,000
$
1,662,000
$
10,344,000
Page 22
As of September 30, 2014
Specific Reserves on Loans Evaluated Individually for Impairment
General Reserves on Loans Based on Historical Loss Experience
Reserves for Qualitative Factors
Unallocated
Reserves
Total Reserves
Commercial
Real estate
$
1,041,000
$
1,409,000
$
1,771,000
$
—
$
4,221,000
Construction
411,000
158,000
198,000
—
767,000
Other
660,000
568,000
714,000
—
1,942,000
Municipal
—
—
15,000
—
15,000
Residential
Term
661,000
296,000
363,000
—
1,320,000
Construction
—
9,000
11,000
—
20,000
Home equity line of credit
70,000
381,000
284,000
—
735,000
Consumer
—
314,000
194,000
—
508,000
Unallocated
—
—
—
2,113,000
2,113,000
$
2,843,000
$
3,135,000
$
3,550,000
$
2,113,000
$
11,641,000
Qualitative adjustment factors are taken into consideration when determining reserve estimates. These adjustment factors are based upon our evaluation of various current conditions, including those listed below.
•
General economic conditions.
•
Credit quality trends with emphasis on loan delinquencies, nonaccrual levels and classified loans.
•
Recent loss experience in particular segments of the portfolio.
•
Loan volumes and concentrations, including changes in mix.
•
Other factors, including changes in quality of the loan origination; loan policy changes; changes in credit risk management processes; Bank regulatory and external loan review examination results.
The qualitative portion of the allowance for loan losses was
0.42%
and
0.39%
of related loans as of
September 30, 2015
and
December 31, 2014
, respectively. The qualitative portion increased
$465,000
between
December 31, 2014
and
September 30, 2015
due to an increase in loans outstanding.
The unallocated component of the allowance totaled
$1,926,000
at
September 30, 2015
, or
19.9%
of the total reserve. This compares to
$1,662,000
or
16.1%
as of
December 31, 2014
. The increase in the unallocated portion is due to increased loan demand in comparison to previous years. Management feels the increase in the unallocated portion is directionally consistent with this change in demand.
The allowance for loan losses as a percent of total loans stood at
1.00%
as of
September 30, 2015
. This compares to
1.13%
of total loans as of
December 31, 2014
and
1.28%
of total loans as of
September 30, 2014
.
Commercial loans are comprised of three major classes, commercial real estate loans, commercial construction loans and other commercial loans. Commercial real estate is primarily comprised of loans to small businesses collateralized by owner-occupied real estate, while other commercial is primarily comprised of loans to small businesses collateralized by plant and equipment, commercial fishing vessels and gear, and limited inventory-based lending. Commercial real estate loans typically have a maximum loan-to-value of
80%
based upon current appraisal information at the time the loan is made. Municipal loans are comprised of loans to municipalities in Maine for capitalized expenditures, construction projects or tax-anticipation notes. All municipal loans are considered general obligations of the municipality and as such are collateralized by the taxing ability of the municipality for repayment of debt.
Construction, land and land development loans, both commercial and residential, comprise a small portion of the portfolio, and at
25.0%
of capital are well under the regulatory guidance of
100.0%
of capital at
September 30, 2015
. Construction loans and non-owner-occupied commercial real estate loans are at
99.1%
of total capital, well under regulatory guidance of
300.0%
of capital at
September 30, 2015
.
The process of establishing the allowance with respect to the commercial loan portfolio begins when a loan officer initially assigns each loan a risk rating, using established credit criteria. Approximately
50%
of the outstanding loans and commitments are subject to review and validation annually by an independent consulting firm, as well as periodically by the Company's internal credit review function. The methodology employs Management's judgment as to the level of losses on existing loans based on internal review of the loan portfolio, including an analysis of a borrower's current financial position, and the consideration of current and anticipated economic conditions and their potential effects on specific borrowers and or lines of business. In
Page 23
determining the Company's ability to collect certain loans, Management also considers the fair value of underlying collateral. The risk rating system has eight levels, defined as follows:
1
Strong
Credits rated "1" are characterized by borrowers fully responsible for the credit with excellent capacity to pay principal and interest. Loans rated "1" may be secured with acceptable forms of liquid collateral.
2
Above Average
Credits rated "2" are characterized by borrowers that have better than average liquidity, capitalization, earnings and/or cash flow with a consistent record of solid financial performance.
3
Satisfactory
Credits rated "3" are characterized by borrowers with favorable liquidity, profitability and financial condition with adequate cash flow to pay debt service.
4
Average
Credits rated "4" are characterized by borrowers that present risk more than 1, 2 and 3 rated loans and merit an ordinary level of ongoing monitoring. Financial condition is on par or somewhat below industry averages while cash flow is generally adequate to meet debt service requirements.
5
Watch
Credits rated "5" are characterized by borrowers that warrant greater monitoring due to financial condition or unresolved and identified risk factors.
6
Other Assets Especially Mentioned (OAEM)
Loans in this category are currently protected but are potentially weak and constitute an undue and unwarranted credit risk, but not to the point of justifying a classification of substandard. OAEM have potential weaknesses which may, if not checked or corrected, weaken the asset or inadequately protect the Company's credit position at some future date.
7
Substandard
Loans in this category are inadequately protected by the paying capacity of the borrower or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans so classified have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. Substandard loans are characterized by the distinct possibility that the Company may sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.
8
Doubtful
Loans classified "Doubtful" have the same weaknesses as those classified substandard with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, based on currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable. The possibility of loss is high, but because of certain important and reasonably specific pending factors which may work to the advantage and strengthening of the asset, its classification as an estimated loss is deferred until its more exact status may be determined.
The following table summarizes the risk ratings for the Company's commercial real estate, commercial construction, commercial other, and municipal loans as of
September 30, 2015
:
Commercial
Real Estate
Commercial
Construction
Commercial
Other
Municipal
Loans
All Risk-
Rated Loans
1 Strong
$
8,000
$
—
$
788,000
$
—
$
796,000
2 Above Average
26,881,000
58,000
8,753,000
19,892,000
55,584,000
3 Satisfactory
50,944,000
2,389,000
29,253,000
1,485,000
84,071,000
4 Average
127,903,000
16,711,000
55,625,000
—
200,239,000
5 Watch
36,213,000
3,749,000
19,457,000
—
59,419,000
6 OAEM
8,477,000
—
1,836,000
—
10,313,000
7 Substandard
18,315,000
717,000
3,385,000
—
22,417,000
8 Doubtful
—
—
—
—
—
Total
$
268,741,000
$
23,624,000
$
119,097,000
$
21,377,000
$
432,839,000
Page 24
The following table summarizes the risk ratings for the Company's commercial real estate, commercial construction, commercial other, and municipal loans as of
December 31, 2014
:
Commercial
Real Estate
Commercial
Construction
Commercial
Other
Municipal
Loans
All Risk-
Rated Loans
1 Strong
$
12,000
$
—
$
330,000
$
—
$
342,000
2 Above Average
12,668,000
771,000
7,210,000
18,789,000
39,438,000
3 Satisfactory
50,275,000
1,983,000
24,232,000
1,635,000
78,125,000
4 Average
108,719,000
23,345,000
44,895,000
—
176,959,000
5 Watch
36,974,000
1,567,000
18,171,000
—
56,712,000
6 OAEM
9,846,000
2,519,000
1,970,000
—
14,335,000
7 Substandard
23,817,000
747,000
7,723,000
—
32,287,000
8 Doubtful
—
—
—
—
—
Total
$
242,311,000
$
30,932,000
$
104,531,000
$
20,424,000
$
398,198,000
The following table summarizes the risk ratings for the Company's commercial real estate, commercial construction, commercial other, and municipal loans as of
September 30, 2014
:
Commercial
Real Estate
Commercial
Construction
Commercial
Other
Municipal
Loans
All Risk-
Rated Loans
1 Strong
$
14,000
$
—
$
300,000
$
—
$
314,000
2 Above Average
11,646,000
1,189,000
7,246,000
19,034,000
39,115,000
3 Satisfactory
50,554,000
1,042,000
22,174,000
1,688,000
75,458,000
4 Average
108,835,000
19,445,000
39,653,000
—
167,933,000
5 Watch
32,963,000
1,946,000
17,174,000
—
52,083,000
6 OAEM
13,578,000
2,555,000
2,211,000
—
18,344,000
7 Substandard
25,827,000
777,000
8,893,000
—
35,497,000
8 Doubtful
519,000
—
—
—
519,000
Total
$
243,936,000
$
26,954,000
$
97,651,000
$
20,722,000
$
389,263,000
Commercial loans are generally charged off when all or a portion of the principal amount is determined to be uncollectible. This determination is based on circumstances specific to a borrower including repayment ability, analysis of collateral and other factors as applicable.
Residential loans are comprised of two classes: term loans, which include traditional amortizing home mortgages, and construction loans, which include loans for owner-occupied residential construction. Residential loans typically have a
75%
to
80%
loan to value based upon current appraisal information at the time the loan is made. Home equity loans and lines of credit are typically written to the same underwriting standards. Consumer loans are primarily amortizing loans to individuals collateralized by automobiles, pleasure craft and recreation vehicles, typically with a maximum loan to value of
80%
to
90%
of the purchase price of the collateral. Consumer loans also include a small amount of unsecured short-term time notes to individuals.
Residential loans, consumer loans and home equity lines of credit are segregated into homogeneous pools with similar risk characteristics. Trends and current conditions are analyzed and historical loss experience is adjusted accordingly. Quantitative and qualitative adjustment factors for these segments are consistent with those for the commercial and municipal classes. Certain loans in the residential, home equity lines of credit and consumer classes identified as having the potential for further deterioration are analyzed individually to confirm impairment status, and to determine the need for a specific reserve; however there is no formal rating system used for these classes. Consumer loans greater than
120
days past due are generally charged off. Residential loans
90
days or more past due are placed on non-accrual status unless the loans are both well secured and in the process of collection. One- to four-family residential real estate loans and home equity loans are written down or charged-off no later than 180 days past due, or for residential real estate secured loans having a borrower in bankruptcy, within 60 days of receipt of notification of filing from the bankruptcy court, whichever is sooner. This is subject to completion of a current assessment of the value of the collateral with any outstanding loan balance in excess of the fair value of the property, less costs to sell, written down or charged-off.
There were no changes to the Company's accounting policies or methodology used to estimate the allowance for loan losses during the
nine months ended September 30, 2015
.
Page 25
The following table presents allowance for loan losses activity by class for the
nine months
and quarter ended
September 30, 2015
, and allowance for loan loss balances by class and related loan balances by class as of
September 30, 2015
:
Commercial
Municipal
Residential
Home Equity Line of Credit
Consumer
Unallocated
Total
Real Estate
Construction
Other
Term
Construction
For the nine months ended September 30, 2015
Beginning balance
$
3,532,000
$
823,000
$
1,505,000
$
15,000
$
1,185,000
$
20,000
$
1,060,000
$
542,000
$
1,662,000
$
10,344,000
Charge offs
254,000
9,000
732,000
—
187,000
—
532,000
282,000
—
1,996,000
Recoveries
1,000
—
66,000
—
37,000
—
31,000
94,000
—
229,000
Provision (credit)
(128,000
)
(256,000
)
537,000
1,000
130,000
2,000
342,000
208,000
264,000
1,100,000
Ending balance
$
3,151,000
$
558,000
$
1,376,000
$
16,000
$
1,165,000
$
22,000
$
901,000
$
562,000
$
1,926,000
$
9,677,000
For the three months ended September 30, 2015
Beginning balance
$
2,943,000
$
705,000
$
1,671,000
$
16,000
$
1,184,000
$
27,000
$
918,000
$
580,000
$
1,864,000
$
9,908,000
Charge offs
132,000
—
246,000
—
38,000
—
24,000
77,000
—
517,000
Recoveries
1,000
—
51,000
—
4,000
—
1,000
29,000
—
86,000
Provision (credit)
339,000
(147,000
)
(100,000
)
—
15,000
(5,000
)
6,000
30,000
62,000
200,000
Ending balance
$
3,151,000
$
558,000
$
1,376,000
$
16,000
$
1,165,000
$
22,000
$
901,000
$
562,000
$
1,926,000
$
9,677,000
Allowance for loan losses as of September 30, 2015
Ending balance specifically evaluated for impairment
$
71,000
$
282,000
$
8,000
$
—
$
435,000
$
—
$
30,000
$
—
$
—
$
826,000
Ending balance collectively evaluated for impairment
$
3,080,000
$
276,000
$
1,368,000
$
16,000
$
730,000
$
22,000
$
871,000
$
562,000
$
1,926,000
$
8,851,000
Related loan balances as of September 30, 2015
Ending balance
$
268,741,000
$
23,624,000
$
119,097,000
$
21,377,000
$
385,145,000
$
12,029,000
$
109,390,000
$
23,748,000
$
—
$
963,151,000
Ending balance specifically evaluated for impairment
$
11,228,000
$
996,000
$
1,736,000
$
—
$
15,276,000
$
—
$
1,550,000
$
—
$
—
$
30,786,000
Ending balance collectively evaluated for impairment
$
257,513,000
$
22,628,000
$
117,361,000
$
21,377,000
$
369,869,000
$
12,029,000
$
107,840,000
$
23,748,000
$
—
$
932,365,000
Page 26
The following table presents allowance for loan losses activity by class for the year-ended
December 31, 2014
and allowance for loan loss balances by class and related loan balances by class as of
December 31, 2014
:
Commercial
Municipal
Residential
Home Equity Line of Credit
Consumer
Unallocated
Total
Real Estate
Construction
Other
Term
Construction
For the year ended December 31, 2014
Beginning balance
$
4,602,000
$
575,000
$
2,276,000
$
15,000
$
1,099,000
$
21,000
$
675,000
$
573,000
$
1,678,000
$
11,514,000
Charge offs
1,205,000
—
989,000
—
699,000
—
153,000
449,000
—
3,495,000
Recoveries
144,000
—
758,000
—
36,000
25,000
16,000
196,000
—
1,175,000
Provision (credit)
(9,000
)
248,000
(540,000
)
—
749,000
(26,000
)
522,000
222,000
(16,000
)
1,150,000
Ending balance
$
3,532,000
$
823,000
$
1,505,000
$
15,000
$
1,185,000
$
20,000
$
1,060,000
$
542,000
$
1,662,000
$
10,344,000
Allowance for loan losses as of December 31, 2014
Ending balance specifically evaluated for impairment
$
346,000
$
413,000
$
129,000
$
—
$
519,000
$
—
$
396,000
$
—
$
—
$
1,803,000
Ending balance collectively evaluated for impairment
$
3,186,000
$
410,000
$
1,376,000
$
15,000
$
666,000
$
20,000
$
664,000
$
542,000
$
1,662,000
$
8,541,000
Related loan balances as of December 31, 2014
Ending balance
$
242,311,000
$
30,932,000
$
104,531,000
$
20,424,000
$
384,032,000
$
12,160,000
$
103,521,000
$
19,653,000
$
—
$
917,564,000
Ending balance specifically evaluated for impairment
$
13,304,000
$
1,380,000
$
2,942,000
$
—
$
16,123,000
$
—
$
2,087,000
$
26,000
$
—
$
35,862,000
Ending balance collectively evaluated for impairment
$
229,007,000
$
29,552,000
$
101,589,000
$
20,424,000
$
367,909,000
$
12,160,000
$
101,434,000
$
19,627,000
$
—
$
881,702,000
Page 27
The following table presents allowance for loan losses activity by class for the
nine months
and quarter ended
September 30, 2014
, and allowance for loan loss balances by class and related loan balances by class as of
September 30, 2014
:
Commercial
Municipal
Residential
Home Equity Line of Credit
Consumer
Unallocated
Total
Real Estate
Construction
Other
Term
Construction
For the nine months ended September 30, 2014
Beginning balance
$
4,602,000
$
575,000
$
2,276,000
$
15,000
$
1,099,000
$
21,000
$
675,000
$
573,000
$
1,678,000
$
11,514,000
Charge offs
530,000
—
244,000
—
446,000
—
153,000
390,000
—
1,763,000
Recoveries
108,000
—
736,000
—
32,000
—
15,000
149,000
—
1,040,000
Provision (credit)
41,000
192,000
(826,000
)
—
635,000
(1,000
)
198,000
176,000
435,000
850,000
Ending balance
$
4,221,000
$
767,000
$
1,942,000
$
15,000
$
1,320,000
$
20,000
$
735,000
$
508,000
$
2,113,000
$
11,641,000
For the three months ended September 30, 2014
Beginning balance
$
4,236,000
$
700,000
$
2,143,000
$
16,000
$
1,264,000
$
23,000
$
753,000
$
582,000
$
1,927,000
$
11,644,000
Charge offs
215,000
—
69,000
—
108,000
—
—
171,000
—
563,000
Recoveries
106,000
—
31,000
—
24,000
—
13,000
36,000
—
210,000
Provision (credit)
94,000
67,000
(163,000
)
(1,000
)
140,000
(3,000
)
(31,000
)
61,000
186,000
350,000
Ending balance
$
4,221,000
$
767,000
$
1,942,000
$
15,000
$
1,320,000
$
20,000
$
735,000
$
508,000
$
2,113,000
$
11,641,000
Allowance for loan losses as of September 30, 2014
Ending balance specifically evaluated for impairment
$
1,041,000
$
411,000
$
660,000
$
—
$
661,000
$
—
$
70,000
$
—
$
—
$
2,843,000
Ending balance collectively evaluated for impairment
$
3,180,000
$
356,000
$
1,282,000
$
15,000
$
659,000
$
20,000
$
665,000
$
508,000
$
2,113,000
$
8,798,000
Related loan balances as of September 30, 2014
Ending balance
$
243,936,000
$
26,954,000
$
97,651,000
$
20,722,000
$
386,768,000
$
12,253,000
$
101,094,000
$
18,737,000
$
—
$
908,115,000
Ending balance specifically evaluated for impairment
$
14,418,000
$
1,380,000
$
3,892,000
$
—
$
15,896,000
$
—
$
1,384,000
$
26,000
$
—
$
36,996,000
Ending balance collectively evaluated for impairment
$
229,518,000
$
25,574,000
$
93,759,000
$
20,722,000
$
370,872,000
$
12,253,000
$
99,710,000
$
18,711,000
$
—
$
871,119,000
Note 5 – Stock Options and Stock-Based Compensation
At the 2010 Annual Meeting, shareholders approved the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan (the "2010 Plan"). This reserves
400,000
shares of common stock for issuance in connection with stock options, restricted stock awards and other equity based awards to attract and retain the best available personnel, provide additional incentive to officers, employees and non-employee Directors and promote the success of our business. Such grants and awards will be structured in a manner that does not encourage the recipients to expose the Company to undue or inappropriate risk. Options issued under the 2010 Plan will qualify for treatment as incentive stock options for purposes of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code. Other compensation under the 2010 Plan will qualify as performance-based for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, and will satisfy NASDAQ guidelines relating to equity compensation.
Page 28
As of
September 30, 2015
,
86,336
shares of restricted stock had been granted under the 2010 Plan, of which
66,644
shares remain restricted as of
September 30, 2015
as detailed in the following table:
Year
Granted
Vesting Term
(In Years)
Shares
Remaining Term
(In Years)
2011
5.0
5,500
0.3
2012
4.0
2,704
0.4
2012
5.0
7,996
1.4
2013
3.0
3,808
0.3
2013
5.0
14,776
2.3
2014
2.0
7,786
0.3
2014
5.0
10,422
3.3
2015
1.0
2,156
0.3
2015
5.0
11,496
4.3
66,644
2.0
The compensation cost related to these restricted stock grants is
$1,079,000
and will be recognized over the vesting terms of each grant. In the
nine months ended September 30, 2015
,
$222,000
of expense was recognized for these restricted shares, leaving
$419,000
in unrecognized expense as of
September 30, 2015
. In the
nine months ended September 30, 2014
,
$317,000
of expense was recognized for restricted shares, leaving
$526,000
in unrecognized expense as of
September 30, 2014
.
The Company established a shareholder-approved stock option plan in 1995 (the "1995 Plan"), under which the Company granted options to employees for
600,000
shares of common stock. Only incentive stock options were granted under the 1995 Plan. The option price of each option grant was determined by the Options Committee of the Board of Directors, and in no instance was less than the fair market value on the date of the grant. An option's maximum term was ten years from the date of grant, with
50%
of the options granted vesting
two years
from the date of grant and the remaining
50%
vesting
five years
from the date of grant. As of January 16, 2005, all options under the 1995 Plan had been granted.
The Company applies the fair value recognition provisions of the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 718 "Compensation – Stock Compensation", to stock-based employee compensation. As of
September 30, 2015
, all outstanding options were fully vested and all compensation cost for options had been recognized. A summary of the status of outstanding stock options as of
September 30, 2015
and changes during the
nine months
then ended, is presented below.
Number of Shares
Weighted Average Exercise Price
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (In years)
Aggregate Intrinsic Value
(In thousands)
Outstanding at December 31, 2014
42,000
$
18.00
Granted in 2015
—
—
—
Exercised in 2015
—
—
—
Expired unexercised in 2015
42,000
18.00
—
Outstanding at September 30, 2015
—
$
—
—
—
Exercisable at September 30, 2015
—
$
—
—
—
Page 29
Note 6 – Preferred and Common Stock
Preferred Stock
On January 9, 2009, the Company issued
$25,000,000
in Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A, by the U.S. Treasury ("Treasury') under the Capital Purchase Program ("the CPP Shares"). The CPP Shares qualified as Tier 1 capital on the Company's books for regulatory purposes and ranked senior to the Company's common stock and senior or at an equal level in the Company's capital structure to any other shares of preferred stock the Company may issue in the future. In three separate transactions in 2012 and 2013, the Company repurchased all of the CPP shares from the Treasury.
Incident to such issuance of the CPP shares, the Company issued to the Treasury warrants (the "Warrants") to purchase up to
225,904
shares of the Company's common stock at a price per share of
$16.60
(subject to adjustment). The Warrants (and any shares of common stock issuable pursuant to the Warrants) are freely transferable by Treasury to third parties. The Warrants have a term of ten years and could be exercised by Treasury or a subsequent holder at any time or from time to time during their term. To the extent they had not previously been exercised, the Warrants will expire after ten years. The Warrants were unchanged as a result of the CPP Shares repurchase transactions.
In May 2015, the Treasury sold the entire number of Warrants to private parties. In accordance with the contractual terms of the Warrants, the number of shares and strike price were adjusted at the time of the sale. As a result of this transaction, the number of shares under the Warrants now stands at
226,819
shares with a strike price of
$16.53
.
Common Stock
On March 28, 2013, the Company consummated a fully underwritten offering for
760,771
shares of the Company's common stock, with net proceeds of
$11,649,000
. The Company used these proceeds to repurchase the remaining
$10,000,000
of CPP Shares on May 8, 2013. Proceeds from sale of common stock totaled
$343,000
and
$342,000
for the
nine months
ended
September 30, 2015
and
2014
, respectively.
Note 7 – Earnings Per Share
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) for the
nine months ended September 30, 2015
and
2014
:
Income (Numerator)
Shares (Denominator)
Per-Share Amount
For the nine months ended September 30, 2015
Net income as reported
$
12,437,000
Basic EPS: Income available to common shareholders
12,437,000
10,671,573
$
1.17
Effect of dilutive securities: restricted stock and warrants
80,706
Diluted EPS: Income available to common shareholders plus assumed conversions
$
12,437,000
10,752,279
$
1.16
For the nine months ended September 30, 2014
Net income as reported
$
11,283,000
Basic EPS: Income available to common shareholders
11,283,000
10,634,945
$
1.06
Effect of dilutive securities: restricted stock
68,803
Diluted EPS: Income available to common shareholders plus assumed conversions
$
11,283,000
10,703,748
$
1.05
Page 30
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted EPS for the quarters ended
September 30, 2015
and
2014
.
Income (Numerator)
Shares (Denominator)
Per-Share Amount
For the quarter ended September 30, 2015
Net income as reported
$
4,188,000
Basic EPS: Income available to common shareholders
4,188,000
10,677,922
$
0.39
Effect of dilutive securities: restricted stock and warrants
95,278
Diluted EPS: Income available to common shareholders plus assumed conversions
$
4,188,000
10,773,200
$
0.39
For the quarter ended September 30, 2014
Net income as reported
$
4,108,000
Basic EPS: Income available to common shareholders
4,108,000
10,642,382
$
0.39
Effect of dilutive securities: restricted stock
74,439
Diluted EPS: Income available to common shareholders plus assumed conversions
$
4,108,000
10,716,821
$
0.38
All earnings per share calculations have been made using the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. The potentially dilutive securities are incentive stock options, unvested shares of restricted stock granted to certain key members of Management and the warrants. The number of dilutive shares is calculated using the treasury method, assuming that all options and warrants were exercisable at the end of each period. Options and warrants that are out-of-the-money are not considered in the calculation of dilutive earnings per share as the effect would be anti-dilutive.
The following table presents the number of options and warrants outstanding as of
September 30, 2015
and
2014
and the amount for which the average market price at period end is above or below the strike price:
Outstanding
In-the-Money
Out-of-the-Money
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015
Incentive stock options
—
—
—
Warrants to private parties
226,819
226,819
—
Total dilutive securities
226,819
226,819
—
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014
Incentive stock options
42,000
—
42,000
Warrants issued to Treasury
225,904
—
225,904
Total dilutive securities
267,904
—
267,904
Note 8 – Employee Benefit Plans
401(k) Plan
The Bank has a defined contribution plan available to substantially all employees who have completed
3 months
of service. Employees may contribute up to Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") determined limits and the Bank may match employee contributions not to exceed
3.0%
of compensation depending on contribution level. Subject to a vote of the Board of Directors, the Bank may also make a profit-sharing contribution to the Plan. Such contribution equaled
2.0%
of each eligible employee's compensation in
2014
. The amount for
2015
has not been established. The expense related to the 401(k) plan was
$333,000
and
$327,000
for the
nine months ended September 30, 2015
and
2014
, respectively.
Page 31
Deferred Compensation and Supplemental Retirement Benefits
The Bank also provides unfunded, non-qualified deferred compensation payable over
two years
, as well as unfunded supplemental retirement benefits for certain officers, payable in installments over
20
years upon retirement or death. The agreements consist of individual contracts with differing characteristics that, when taken together, do not constitute a postretirement plan. The costs for these benefits are recognized over the service periods of the participating officers in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 712 "Compensation – Nonretirement Postemployment Benefits". The expense of these supplemental retirement benefits was
$234,000
for the
nine months ended September 30, 2015
and
$629,000
for the same period in
2014
. As of
September 30, 2015
, the associated accrued liability included in other liabilities in the balance sheet was
$3,074,000
compared to
$2,999,000
and
$2,920,000
at
December 31, 2014
and
September 30, 2014
, respectively.
Post-Retirement Benefit Plans
The Bank sponsors
two
post-retirement benefit plans. One plan currently provides a subsidy for health insurance premiums to certain retired employees and a future subsidy for
seven
active employees who were age
50
and over in 1996. These subsidies are based on years of service and range between
$40
and
$1,200
per month per person. The other plan provides life insurance coverage to certain retired employees and health insurance for retired directors. None of these plans are pre-funded. The Company utilizes FASB ASC Topic 712 "Compensation – Nonretirement Postemployment Benefits" to recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan as an asset or liability in its balance sheet and to recognize changes in the funded status in the year in which the changes occur through comprehensive income. The following table sets forth the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation and funded status:
At or for the nine months ended September 30,
2015
2014
Change in benefit obligation
Benefit obligation at beginning of year
$
1,928,000
$
1,479,000
Service cost
—
15,000
Interest cost
54,000
66,000
Benefits paid
(78,000
)
(78,000
)
Benefit obligation at end of period
$
1,904,000
$
1,482,000
Funded status
Benefit obligation at end of period
$
(1,904,000
)
$
(1,482,000
)
Unamortized (gain) loss
192,000
(289,000
)
Accrued benefit cost at end of period
$
(1,712,000
)
$
(1,771,000
)
The following table sets forth the net periodic pension cost:
For the nine months ended September 30,
For the quarters ended September 30,
2015
2014
2015
2014
Components of net periodic benefit cost
Service cost
$
—
$
15,000
$
—
$
5,000
Interest cost
54,000
66,000
18,000
22,000
Net periodic benefit cost
$
54,000
$
81,000
$
18,000
$
27,000
Amounts not yet reflected in net periodic benefit cost and included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) are as follows:
September 30,
2015
December 31, 2014
September 30,
2014
Unamortized net actuarial gain (loss)
$
(192,000
)
$
(192,000
)
$
289,000
Deferred tax (expense) benefit at 35%
67,000
67,000
(101,000
)
Net unrecognized postretirement benefits included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
$
(125,000
)
$
(125,000
)
$
188,000
Page 32
A weighted average discount rate of
4.25%
was used in determining the accumulated benefit obligation and the net periodic benefit cost. The assumed health care cost trend rate is
7.0%
. The measurement date for benefit obligations was as of year-end for prior years presented. The expected benefit payments for the third quarter of
2015
are
$30,000
and the expected benefit payments for all of
2015
are
$120,000
. Plan expense for
2015
is estimated to be
$80,000
. A 1% change in trend assumptions would create an approximate change in the same direction of
$100,000
in the accumulated benefit obligation,
$7,000
in the interest cost and
$1,000
in the service cost.
Note 9 - Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
The following table summarizes activity in the unrealized gain or loss on available for sale securities included in other comprehensive income (loss) for the
nine months
and quarters ended
September 30, 2015
and
2014
.
For the nine months ended September 30,
For the quarters ended September 30,
2015
2014
2015
2014
Balance at beginning of period
$
2,522,000
$
(6,591,000
)
$
988,000
$
1,546,000
Unrealized gains arising during the period
1,082,000
13,172,000
2,047,000
614,000
Reclassification of realized gains during the period
(1,396,000
)
(1,145,000
)
(1,000
)
(1,105,000
)
Related deferred taxes
110,000
(4,209,000
)
(716,000
)
172,000
Net change
(204,000
)
7,818,000
1,330,000
(319,000
)
Balance at end of period
$
2,318,000
$
1,227,000
$
2,318,000
$
1,227,000
The reclassification of realized gains is included in the net securities gains line of the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income and the tax effect is included in the income tax expense line of the same statement.
The following table summarizes activity in the unrealized loss on securities transferred from available for sale to held to maturity included in other comprehensive income (loss) for the
nine months
and quarters ended
September 30, 2015
and
2014
.
For the nine months ended September 30,
For the quarters ended September 30,
2015
2014
2015
2014
Balance at beginning of period
$
(48,000
)
$
—
$
(84,000
)
$
—
Net unrealized losses transferred during the period
—
(23,000
)
—
(23,000
)
Amortization of net unrealized losses
(78,000
)
(19,000
)
(51,000
)
(19,000
)
Related deferred taxes
27,000
14,000
36,000
14,000
Net change
(51,000
)
(28,000
)
(15,000
)
(28,000
)
Balance at end of period
$
(99,000
)
$
(28,000
)
$
(99,000
)
$
(28,000
)
The following table summarizes activity in the unrealized gain or loss on postretirement benefits included in other comprehensive income (loss) for the
nine months
and quarters ended
September 30, 2015
and
2014
.
For the nine months ended September 30,
For the quarters ended September 30,
2015
2014
2015
2014
Unrecognized postretirement benefits at beginning of period
$
(125,000
)
$
188,000
$
(125,000
)
$
188,000
Amortization of unrecognized transition obligation
—
—
—
—
Change in unamortized net actuarial gain (loss)
—
—
—
—
Related deferred taxes
—
—
—
—
Unrecognized postretirement benefits at end of period
$
(125,000
)
$
188,000
$
(125,000
)
$
188,000
Page 33
Note 10 - Acquisitions and Intangible Assets
On October 26, 2012, the Bank completed the purchase of a branch at 63 Union Street in Rockland, Maine, from Camden National Bank that was formerly operated by Bank of America. As part of the transaction, the Bank acquired approximately
$32,300,000
in deposits as well as a small volume of loans.
The purchase premium of
$2,553,000
was allocated to assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on estimates of fair value at the date of acquisition. The fair value of the deposit accounts assumed was compared to the carrying amounts received and the difference of
$432,000
was recorded as core deposit intangible. The core deposit intangible is subject to amortization over the estimated
ten
-year average life of the acquired core deposit base and will be evaluated for impairment periodically. The amortization expense is included in noninterest expense in the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income and is deductible for tax purposes.
The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and the amount allocated for core deposit intangible totaled
$2,121,000
and was recorded as goodwill. The goodwill is not amortizable for GAAP but is amortizable for tax purposes.
On January 14, 2005, the Company acquired FNB Bankshares (“FNB”) of Bar Harbor, Maine, and its subsidiary, The First National Bank of Bar Harbor. The total value of the transaction was
$47,955,000
, and all of the voting equity interest of FNB was acquired in the transaction. The transaction was accounted for as a purchase and the excess of purchase price over the fair value of net identifiable assets acquired equaled
$27,559,000
and was recorded as goodwill, none of which was deductible for tax purposes. The portion of the purchase price related to the core deposit intangible is being amortized over its expected economic life.
Goodwill is evaluated annually for possible impairment under the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 350, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other”. As of
December 31, 2014
, in accordance with Topic 350, the Company completed its annual review of goodwill and determined there has been no impairment. The Bank also carries
$125,000
in goodwill for a de minimus transaction in 2001.
As of
December 31, 2014
, the amortization expense related to the core deposit intangible, absent any future impairment, is expected to be as follows:
2015
$
57,000
2016
43,000
2017
43,000
2018
43,000
2019
43,000
Thereafter
131,000
Total
$
360,000
Note 11 – Mortgage Servicing Rights
FASB ASC Topic 860 "Transfers and Servicing" requires all separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities to be initially measured at fair value, if practicable. The Company's servicing assets and servicing liabilities are reported using the amortization method and carried at the lower of amortized cost or fair value by strata. In evaluating the carrying values of mortgage servicing rights, the Company obtains third party valuations based on loan level data including note rate, type and term of the underlying loans. The model utilizes several assumptions, the most significant of which is loan prepayments, calculated using a three-month moving average of weekly prepayment data published by the Public Securities Association (PSA) and modeled against the serviced loan portfolio, and the discount rate to discount future cash flows. As of
September 30, 2015
, the prepayment assumption using the PSA model was
169
, which translates into an anticipated prepayment rate of
10.14%
. The discount rate is the quarterly average
10
year U.S. Treasury plus
5.00%
. Other assumptions include delinquency rates, foreclosure rates, servicing cost inflation, and annual unit loan cost. All assumptions are adjusted periodically to reflect current circumstances. Amortization of mortgage servicing rights, as well as write-offs due to prepayments of the related mortgage loans, are recorded as a charge against mortgage servicing fee income.
For the
nine months ended September 30, 2015
and
2014
, servicing rights capitalized totaled
$358,000
and
$233,000
, respectively. Servicing rights capitalized for the three-month periods ended
September 30, 2015
and
2014
, were
$131,000
and
$103,000
, respectively. Servicing rights amortized for the
nine months
ended
September 30, 2015
and
2014
, were
$337,000
and
$327,000
, respectively. The fair value of servicing rights was
$2,014,000
,
$2,088,000
and
$2,135,000
at
September 30, 2015
,
December 31, 2014
and
September 30, 2014
, respectively. The Bank serviced loans for others totaling
$218,624,000
,
$214,086,000
and
$210,755,000
at
September 30, 2015
,
December 31, 2014
, and
September 30, 2014
, respectively.
Page 34
Mortgage servicing rights are included in other assets and detailed in the following table:
September 30,
2015
December 31,
2014
September 30,
2014
Mortgage servicing rights
$
6,398,000
$
6,039,000
$
5,928,000
Accumulated amortization
(5,287,000
)
(4,949,000
)
(4,848,000
)
Impairment reserve
(16,000
)
(4,000
)
(2,000
)
$
1,095,000
$
1,086,000
$
1,078,000
Note 12 – Income Taxes
FASB ASC Topic 740 "Income Taxes" defines the criteria that an individual tax position must satisfy for some or all of the benefits of that position to be recognized in a company's financial statements. Topic 740 prescribes a recognition threshold of more-likely-than-not, and a measurement attribute for all tax positions taken or expected to be taken on a tax return, in order for those tax positions to be recognized in the financial statements. The Company is currently open to audit under the statute of limitations by the IRS for the years ended December 31, 2012 through 2014.
Note 13 - Certificates of Deposit
The following table represents the breakdown of certificates of deposit at
September 30, 2015
and
2014
, and at
December 31, 2014
:
September 30, 2015
December 31, 2014
September 30, 2014
Certificates of deposit < $100,000
$
141,946,000
$
184,471,000
$
208,972,000
Certificates $100,000 to $250,000
204,707,000
221,892,000
210,042,000
Certificates $250,000 and over
42,654,000
41,138,000
44,762,000
$
389,307,000
$
447,501,000
$
463,776,000
Note 14 – Reclassifications
Certain items from the prior year were reclassified in the financial statements to conform with the current year presentation. These do not have a material impact on the consolidated balance sheet or statement of income and comprehensive income presentations.
Note 15 – Fair Value
Certain assets and liabilities are recorded at fair value to provide additional insight into the Company's quality of earnings. Some of these assets and liabilities are measured on a recurring basis while others are measured on a nonrecurring basis, with the determination based upon applicable existing accounting pronouncements. For example, securities available for sale are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Other assets, such as, other real estate owned and impaired loans, are recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis using the lower of cost or market methodology to determine impairment of individual assets. The Company groups assets and liabilities which are recorded at fair value in three levels, based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value. A financial instrument's level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement (with level 1 considered highest and level 3 considered lowest). A brief description of each level follows.
Level 1
- Valuation is based upon quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets.
Level 2
- Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market.
Level 3
- Valuation is generated from model-based techniques that use at least one significant assumption not observable in the market. These unobservable assumptions reflect estimates that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Valuation includes use of discounted cash flow models and similar techniques.
The fair value methods and assumptions for the Company's financial instruments and other assets measured at fair value are set forth below.
Page 35
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Interest-Bearing Deposits in Other Banks
The carrying values of cash equivalents, due from banks and federal funds sold approximate their relative fair values. As such, the Company classifies these financial instruments as Level 1.
Investment Securities
The fair values of investment securities are estimated by independent providers using a market approach with observable inputs, including matrix pricing and recent transactions. In obtaining such valuation information from third parties, the Company has evaluated their valuation methodologies used to develop the fair values in order to determine whether the valuations are representative of an exit price in the Company's principal markets. The Company's principal markets for its securities portfolios are the secondary institutional markets, with an exit price that is predominantly reflective of bid level pricing in those markets. Fair values are calculated based on the value of one unit without regard to any premium or discount that may result from concentrations of ownership of a financial instrument, possible tax ramifications, or estimated transaction costs. If these considerations had been incorporated into the fair value estimates, the aggregate fair value could have been changed. The carrying values of restricted equity securities approximate fair values. As such, the Company classifies investment securities as Level 2.
Loans Held for Sale
Loans held for sale are recorded at the lower of carrying value or fair value. The fair value of mortgage loans held for sale is based on what secondary markets are currently offering for portfolios with similar characteristics. As such, the Company classifies mortgage loans held for sale as Level 2.
Loans
Fair values are estimated for portfolios of loans with similar financial characteristics. The fair values of performing loans are calculated by discounting scheduled cash flows through the estimated maturity using estimated market discount rates that reflect the credit and interest risk inherent in the loan. The estimates of maturity are based on the Company's historical experience with repayments for each loan classification, modified, as required, by an estimate of the effect of current economic and lending conditions, and the effects of estimated prepayments. Assumptions regarding credit risk, cash flows, and discount rates are judgmentally determined using available market information and specific borrower information. Management has made estimates of fair value using discount rates that it believes to be reasonable. However, because there is no market for many of these financial instruments, Management has no basis to determine whether the fair value presented above would be indicative of the value negotiated in an actual sale. As such, the Company classifies loans as Level 3, except for certain collateral-dependent impaired loans. Fair values of impaired loans are based on estimated cash flows and are discounted using a rate commensurate with the risk associated with the estimated cash flows, or if collateral dependent, discounted to the appraised value of the collateral as determined by reference to sale prices of similar properties, less costs to sell. As such, the Company classifies collateral dependent impaired loans for which a specific reserve or partial charge off results in a fair value measure as Level 2. All other impaired loans are classified as Level 3.
Other Real Estate Owned
Real estate acquired through foreclosure is initially recorded at fair value. The fair value of other real estate owned is based on property appraisals and an analysis of similar properties currently available. As such, the Company records other real estate owned as nonrecurring Level 2.
Mortgage Servicing Rights
Mortgage servicing rights represent the value associated with servicing residential mortgage loans. Servicing assets and servicing liabilities are reported using the amortization method and compared to fair value for impairment. In evaluating the fair values of mortgage servicing rights, the Company obtains third party valuations based on loan level data including note rate, type and term of the underlying loans. As such, the Company classifies mortgage servicing rights as Level 2.
Accrued Interest Receivable
The fair value estimate of this financial instrument approximates the carrying value as this financial instrument has a short maturity. It is the Company's policy to stop accruing interest on loans for which it is probable that the interest is not collectible. Therefore, this financial instrument has been adjusted for estimated credit loss. As such, the Company classifies accrued interest receivable as Level 2.
Deposits
The fair value of deposits is based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows. The discount rate is estimated using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities. As such, the Company classifies deposits as Level 2.
Page 36
The fair value estimates do not include the benefit that results from the low-cost funding provided by the deposits compared to the cost of borrowing funds in the market. If that value were considered, the fair value of the Company's net assets could increase.
Borrowed Funds
The fair value of borrowed funds is based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows. The discount rate is estimated using the rates currently available for borrowings of similar remaining maturities. As such, the Company classifies borrowed funds as Level 2.
Accrued Interest Payable
The fair value estimate approximates the carrying amount as this financial instrument has a short maturity. The Company classifies accrued interest payable as Level 2.
Off-Balance-Sheet Instruments
Off-balance-sheet instruments include loan commitments. Fair values for loan commitments have not been presented as the future revenue derived from such financial instruments is not significant.
Limitations
Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market information and information about the financial instrument. These values do not reflect any premium or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time the Company's entire holdings of a particular financial instrument. Because no market exists for a significant portion of the Company's financial instruments, fair value estimates are based on Management's judgments regarding future expected loss experience, current economic conditions, risk characteristics of various financial instruments, and other factors. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and therefore cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates. Fair value estimates are based on existing on- and off-balance-sheet financial instruments without attempting to estimate the value of anticipated future business and the value of assets and liabilities that are not considered financial instruments. Other significant assets and liabilities that are not considered financial instruments include the deferred tax asset, premises and equipment, and other real estate owned. In addition, tax ramifications related to the realization of the unrealized gains and losses can have a significant effect on fair value estimates and have not been considered in any of the estimates.
Assets and Liabilities Recorded at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The following tables present the balances of assets and liabilities that were measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of
September 30, 2015
,
December 31, 2014
and
September 30, 2014
.
At September 30, 2015
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
Securities available for sale
Mortgage-backed securities
$
—
$
187,510,000
$
—
$
187,510,000
State and political subdivisions
—
25,290,000
—
25,290,000
Other equity securities
—
3,133,000
—
3,133,000
Total assets
$
—
$
215,933,000
$
—
$
215,933,000
At December 31, 2014
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
Securities available for sale
Mortgage-backed securities
$
—
$
151,855,000
$
—
$
151,855,000
State and political subdivisions
—
30,855,000
—
30,855,000
Other equity securities
—
2,551,000
—
2,551,000
Total assets
$
—
$
185,261,000
$
—
$
185,261,000
Page 37
At September 30, 2014
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
Securities available for sale
Mortgage-backed securities
$
—
$
157,750,000
$
—
$
157,750,000
State and political subdivisions
—
30,619,000
—
30,619,000
Other equity securities
—
2,551,000
—
2,551,000
Total assets
$
—
$
190,920,000
$
—
$
190,920,000
Assets and Liabilities Recorded at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis
The following tables include assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis that have had a fair value adjustment since their initial recognition. Other real estate owned is presented net of an allowance of
$409,000
,
$654,000
and
$533,000
at
September 30, 2015
,
December 31, 2014
, and
September 30, 2014
, respectively. Only collateral-dependent impaired loans with a related specific allowance for loan losses or a partial charge off are included in impaired loans for purposes of fair value disclosures. Impaired loans below are presented net of specific allowances of
$394,000
,
$1,074,000
and
$2,165,000
at
September 30, 2015
,
December 31, 2014
, and
September 30, 2014
, respectively.
At September 30, 2015
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
Other real estate owned
$
—
$
1,916,000
$
—
$
1,916,000
Impaired loans
—
1,413,000
—
1,413,000
Total assets
$
—
$
3,329,000
$
—
$
3,329,000
At December 31, 2014
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
Other real estate owned
$
—
$
3,785,000
$
—
$
3,785,000
Impaired loans
—
1,909,000
—
1,909,000
Total assets
$
—
$
5,694,000
$
—
$
5,694,000
At September 30, 2014
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
Other real estate owned
$
—
$
4,557,000
$
—
$
4,557,000
Impaired loans
—
2,465,000
—
2,465,000
Total assets
$
—
$
7,022,000
$
—
$
7,022,000
Page 38
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
FASB ASC Topic 825 "Financial Instruments" requires disclosures of fair value information about financial instruments, whether or not recognized in the balance sheet, if the fair values can be reasonably determined. Fair value is best determined based upon quoted market prices. However, in many instances, there are no quoted market prices for the Company's various financial instruments. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques using observable inputs when available. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. Accordingly, the fair value estimates may not be realized in an immediate settlement of the instrument. Topic 825 excludes certain financial instruments and all nonfinancial instruments from its disclosure requirements. Accordingly, the aggregate fair value amounts presented may not necessarily represent the underlying fair value of the Company.
The carrying amount and estimated fair values for financial instruments as of
September 30, 2015
were as follows:
Carrying value
Estimated fair value
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Financial assets
Cash and cash equivalents
$
19,169,000
$
19,169,000
$
19,169,000
$
—
$
—
Interest bearing deposits in other banks
301,000
301,000
301,000
—
—
Securities available for sale
215,933,000
215,933,000
—
215,933,000
—
Securities to be held to maturity
245,322,000
248,344,000
—
248,344,000
—
Restricted equity securities
13,912,000
13,912,000
—
13,912,000
—
Loans held for sale
200,000
200,000
—
200,000
—
Loans (net of allowance for loan losses)
Commercial
Real estate
264,807,000
262,197,000
—
—
262,197,000
Construction
22,927,000
22,701,000
—
—
22,701,000
Other
117,379,000
117,427,000
—
—
117,427,000
Municipal
21,357,000
21,907,000
—
21,907,000
Residential
Term
383,691,000
390,392,000
—
1,413,000
388,979,000
Construction
12,002,000
11,960,000
—
—
11,960,000
Home equity line of credit
108,265,000
107,589,000
—
—
107,589,000
Consumer
23,046,000
23,117,000
—
—
23,117,000
Total loans
953,474,000
957,290,000
—
1,413,000
955,877,000
Mortgage servicing rights
1,095,000
2,014,000
—
2,014,000
—
Accrued interest receivable
5,189,000
5,189,000
—
5,189,000
—
Financial liabilities
Demand deposits
$
128,555,000
$
124,979,000
$
—
$
124,979,000
$
—
NOW deposits
246,155,000
230,680,000
—
230,680,000
—
Money market deposits
95,217,000
84,535,000
—
84,535,000
—
Savings deposits
199,131,000
176,791,000
—
176,791,000
—
Local certificates of deposit
195,607,000
196,663,000
—
196,663,000
—
National certificates of deposit
193,700,000
193,774,000
—
193,774,000
—
Total deposits
1,058,365,000
1,007,422,000
—
1,007,422,000
—
Repurchase agreements
100,498,000
95,078,000
—
95,078,000
—
Federal Home Loan Bank advances
196,871,000
197,795,000
—
197,795,000
—
Total borrowed funds
297,369,000
292,873,000
—
292,873,000
—
Accrued interest payable
499,000
499,000
—
499,000
—
Page 39
The carrying amounts and estimated fair values for financial instruments as of
December 31, 2014
were as follows:
Carrying value
Estimated fair value
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Financial assets
Cash and cash equivalents
$
13,057,000
$
13,057,000
$
13,057,000
$
—
$
—
Interest bearing deposits in other banks
3,559,000
3,559,000
3,559,000
—
—
Securities available for sale
185,261,000
185,261,000
—
185,261,000
—
Securities to be held to maturity
275,919,000
279,704,000
—
279,704,000
—
Restricted equity securities
13,912,000
13,912,000
—
13,912,000
—
Loans (net of allowance for loan losses)
Commercial
Real estate
238,104,000
236,368,000
—
431,000
235,937,000
Construction
29,951,000
29,733,000
—
—
29,733,000
Other
102,738,000
102,858,000
—
—
102,858,000
Municipal
20,406,000
20,833,000
—
—
20,833,000
Residential
Term
382,620,000
389,200,000
—
990,000
388,210,000
Construction
12,136,000
12,123,000
—
—
12,123,000
Home equity line of credit
102,258,000
101,733,000
—
488,000
101,245,000
Consumer
19,007,000
19,207,000
—
—
19,207,000
Total loans
907,220,000
912,055,000
—
1,909,000
910,146,000
Mortgage servicing rights
1,086,000
2,088,000
—
2,088,000
—
Accrued interest receivable
4,748,000
4,748,000
—
4,748,000
—
Financial liabilities
Demand deposits
$
113,133,000
$
109,973,000
$
—
$
109,973,000
$
—
NOW deposits
199,977,000
186,490,000
—
186,490,000
—
Money market deposits
98,607,000
83,837,000
—
83,837,000
—
Savings deposits
165,601,000
146,936,000
—
146,936,000
—
Local certificates of deposit
205,072,000
205,360,000
—
205,360,000
—
National certificates of deposit
242,429,000
242,824,000
—
242,824,000
—
Total deposits
1,024,819,000
975,420,000
—
975,420,000
—
Repurchase agreements
74,725,000
70,783,000
—
70,783,000
—
Federal Home Loan Bank advances
205,191,000
208,259,000
—
208,259,000
—
Total borrowed funds
279,916,000
279,042,000
—
279,042,000
—
Accrued interest payable
521,000
521,000
—
521,000
—
Page 40
The carrying amount and estimated fair values for financial instruments as of
September 30, 2014
were as follows:
Carrying value
Estimated fair value
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Financial assets
Cash and cash equivalents
$
17,167,000
$
17,167,000
$
17,167,000
$
—
$
—
Interest bearing deposits in other banks
773,000
773,000
773,000
—
—
Securities available for sale
190,920,000
190,920,000
—
190,920,000
—
Securities to be held to maturity
281,740,000
280,779,000
—
280,779,000
—
Restricted equity securities
13,912,000
13,912,000
—
13,912,000
—
Loans held for sale
383,000
383,000
—
383,000
—
Loans (net of allowance for loan losses)
Commercial
Real estate
238,779,000
237,103,000
—
353,000
236,750,000
Construction
26,017,000
25,834,000
—
—
25,834,000
Other
95,278,000
95,470,000
—
162,000
95,308,000
Municipal
20,704,000
20,947,000
—
—
20,947,000
Residential
Term
385,155,000
390,586,000
—
1,770,000
388,816,000
Construction
12,229,000
12,205,000
—
—
12,205,000
Home equity line of credit
100,196,000
99,701,000
—
180,000
99,521,000
Consumer
18,116,000
18,337,000
—
—
18,337,000
Total loans
896,474,000
900,183,000
—
2,465,000
897,718,000
Mortgage servicing rights
1,078,000
2,135,000
—
2,135,000
—
Accrued interest receivable
5,141,000
5,141,000
—
5,141,000
—
Financial liabilities
Demand deposits
$
119,512,000
$
113,930,000
$
—
$
113,930,000
$
—
NOW deposits
213,694,000
195,698,000
—
195,698,000
—
Money market deposits
99,260,000
82,678,000
—
82,678,000
—
Savings deposits
159,080,000
138,305,000
—
138,305,000
—
Local certificates of deposit
210,332,000
210,696,000
—
210,696,000
—
National certificates of deposit
253,444,000
254,176,000
—
254,176,000
—
Total deposits
1,055,322,000
995,483,000
—
995,483,000
—
Repurchase agreements
86,908,000
81,704,000
—
81,704,000
—
Federal Home Loan Bank advances
171,728,000
175,189,000
—
175,189,000
—
Total borrowed funds
258,636,000
256,893,000
—
256,893,000
—
Accrued interest payable
535,000
535,000
—
535,000
—
Note 16 – Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In January 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-01, Accounting for Investments in Qualified Affordable Housing Projects. The amendments in this Update permit entities to make accounting policy elections to account for their investments in qualified affordable housing projects using the proportional amortization method if certain conditions are met. Under the proportional amortization method, an entity amortizes the initial cost of the investment in proportion to the tax credits and other tax benefits received and recognizes the net investment performance in the income statement as a component of income tax expense (benefit). For those investments in qualified affordable housing projects not accounted for using the proportional amortization method, the ASU requires the investment to be accounted for as an equity method investment or a cost method investment. The amendments in this Update should be applied retrospectively to all periods presented. A reporting entity that uses the effective yield method to account for its investments in qualified affordable housing projects before the date of adoption may continue to apply the effective yield method for those preexisting investments. The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual periods and interim reporting periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2014. The ASU did not have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
Page 41
In January 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-04, Reclassification of Residential Real Estate Collateralized Consumer Mortgage Loans upon Foreclosure. The amendments in this Update clarify that an in-substance repossession or foreclosure occurs, and a creditor is considered to have received physical possession of residential real estate property collateralizing a consumer mortgage loan, upon either (1) the creditor obtaining legal title to the residential real estate property upon completion of a foreclosure or (2) the borrower conveying all interest in the residential real estate property to the creditor to satisfy that loan through completion of a deed in lieu of foreclosure or through a similar legal agreement. Additionally, the amendments require disclosure of both (1) the amount of foreclosed residential real estate property held by the creditor and (2) the recorded investment in consumer mortgage loans collateralized by residential real estate property that are in the process of foreclosure. The amendments in this Update are effective for annual periods and interim reporting periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2014. The ASU did not have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
In May 2014, the FASB Issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The ASU was issued to clarify the principles for recognizing revenue and to develop a common revenue standard for U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. The ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of the ASU on its consolidated financial statements.
In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-11, Transfers and Servicing: Repurchase-to-Maturity Transactions, Repurchase Financings, and Disclosures. The ASU was issued to respond to concerns about current accounting and disclosures for repurchase agreements and similar transactions. The concern was that under current accounting guidance there is an unnecessary distinction between the accounting for different types of repurchase agreements. Under current guidance, the repurchase-to-maturity transactions are accounted for as sales with forward agreements, whereas repurchase agreements that settle before the maturity of the transferred financial asset are accounted for as secured borrowings. The ASU amendments require new disclosures for repurchase agreements, securities lending transactions, and repurchase-to-maturity transactions accounted for as secured borrowings. The ASU is effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2014. The ASU did not have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-12, Compensation - Stock Compensation: Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period. The ASU was issued because current U.S. GAAP does not contain explicit guidance on how to account for share-based payments when a performance target could be achieved after the requisite service period. The ASU is effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. The ASU will not have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-14, Receivables - Troubled Debt Restructurings by Creditors: Classification of Certain Government-Guaranteed Mortgage Loans upon Foreclosure. The ASU was issued to provide specific guidance on how to classify or measure foreclosed mortgage loans that are government guaranteed. The ASU is effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2014. The ASU did not have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
Page 42
Item 2 – Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations
The First Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Forward-Looking Statements
This report contains statements that are "forward-looking statements." We may also make written or oral forward-looking statements in other documents we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), in our annual reports to shareholders, in press releases and other written materials, and in oral statements made by our officers, directors or employees. You can identify forward-looking statements by the use of the words "believe," "expect," "anticipate," "intend," "estimate," "assume," "outlook," "will," "should," and other expressions that predict or indicate future events and trends and which do not relate to historical matters. You should not rely on forward-looking statements, because they involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, some of which are beyond the control of the Company. These risks, uncertainties and other factors may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from the anticipated future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements.
Some of the factors that might cause these differences include the following: changes in general national, regional or international economic conditions or conditions affecting the banking or financial services industries or financial capital markets, volatility and disruption in national and international financial markets, government intervention in the U.S. financial system, reductions in net interest income resulting from interest rate volatility as well as changes in the balance and mix of loans and deposits, reductions in the market value of wealth management assets under administration, changes in the value of securities and other assets, reductions in loan demand, changes in loan collectability, default and charge-off rates, changes in the size and nature of the Company's competition, changes in legislation or regulation and accounting principles, policies and guidelines, and changes in the assumptions used in making such forward-looking statements. In addition, the factors described under "Risk Factors" in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2014
, as filed with the SEC, may result in these differences. You should carefully review all of these factors, and you should be aware that there may be other factors that could cause these differences. These forward-looking statements were based on information, plans and estimates at the date of this quarterly report, and we assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect changes in underlying assumptions or factors, new information, future events or other changes.
Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, actual results may differ materially from the results discussed in these forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. The Company undertakes no obligation to republish revised forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. Readers are also urged to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made by the Company, which attempt to advise interested parties of the facts that affect the Company's business.
Critical Accounting Policies
Management's discussion and analysis of the Company's financial condition is based on the consolidated financial statements which are prepared in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of such financial statements requires Management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, Management evaluates its estimates, including those related to the allowance for loan losses, goodwill, the valuation of mortgage servicing rights, and other-than-temporary impairment on securities. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis in making judgments about the carrying values of assets that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results could differ from the amount derived from Management's estimates and assumptions under different assumptions or conditions.
Allowance for Loan Losses.
Management believes the allowance for loan losses requires the most significant estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements. The allowance for loan losses is based on Management's evaluation of the level of the allowance required in relation to the estimated loss exposure in the loan portfolio. Management believes the allowance for loan losses is a significant estimate and therefore regularly evaluates it to determine the appropriate level by taking into consideration factors such as prior loan loss experience, the character and size of the loan portfolio, business and economic conditions and Management's estimation of potential losses. The use of different estimates or assumptions could produce different provisions for loan losses.
Goodwill.
Management utilizes numerous techniques to estimate the value of various assets held by the Company, including methods to determine the appropriate carrying value of goodwill as required under FASB ASC Topic 350 "Intangibles – Goodwill and Other." In addition, goodwill from a purchase acquisition is subject to ongoing periodic impairment tests, which include an evaluation of the ongoing assets, liabilities and revenues from the acquisition and an estimation of the impact of business conditions.
Page 43
Mortgage Servicing Rights.
The valuation of mortgage servicing rights is a critical accounting policy which requires significant estimates and assumptions. The Bank often sells mortgage loans it originates and retains the ongoing servicing of such loans, receiving a fee for these services, generally 0.25% of the outstanding balance of the loan per annum. Mortgage servicing rights are recognized at fair value when they are acquired through the sale of loans, and are reported in other assets. They are amortized into non-interest income in proportion to, and over the period of, the estimated future net servicing income of the underlying financial assets. The rights are subsequently carried at the lower of amortized cost or fair value. Management uses an independent firm which specializes in the valuation of mortgage servicing rights to determine the fair value which is recorded on the balance sheet. The most important assumption is the anticipated loan prepayment rate, and increases in prepayment speed results in lower valuations of mortgage servicing rights. The valuation also includes an evaluation for impairment based upon the fair value of the rights, which can vary depending upon current interest rates and prepayment expectations, as compared to amortized cost. Impairment is determined by stratifying rights by predominant characteristics, such as interest rates and terms. The use of different assumptions could produce a different valuation. All of the assumptions are based on standards the Company believes would be utilized by market participants in valuing mortgage servicing rights and are consistently derived and/or benchmarked against independent public sources.
Other-Than-Temporary Impairment on Securities.
One of the significant estimates related to investment securities is the evaluation of other-than-temporary impairments. The evaluation of securities for other-than-temporary impairments is a quantitative and qualitative process, which is subject to risks and uncertainties and is intended to determine whether declines in the fair value of investments should be recognized in current period earnings. The risks and uncertainties include changes in general economic conditions, the issuer's financial condition and/or future prospects, the effects of changes in interest rates or credit spreads and the expected recovery period of unrealized losses. Securities that are in an unrealized loss position are reviewed at least quarterly to determine if other-than-temporary impairment is present based on certain quantitative and qualitative factors and measures. The primary factors considered in evaluating whether a decline in value of securities is other-than-temporary include: (a) the length of time and extent to which the fair value has been less than cost or amortized cost and the expected recovery period of the security, (b) the financial condition, credit rating and future prospects of the issuer, (c) whether the debtor is current on contractually obligated interest and principal payments, (d) the volatility of the securities' market price, (e) the intent and ability of the Company to retain the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for recovery, which may be at maturity and (f) any other information and observable data considered relevant in determining whether other-than-temporary impairment has occurred, including the expectation of receipt of all principal and interest when due.
Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures
Certain information in Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and elsewhere in this Report contains financial information determined by methods other than in accordance with GAAP. Management uses these "non-GAAP" measures in its analysis of the Company's performance and believes that these non-GAAP financial measures provide a greater understanding of ongoing operations and enhance comparability of results with prior periods as well as demonstrating the effects of significant gains and charges in the current period. The Company believes that a meaningful analysis of its financial performance requires an understanding of the factors underlying that performance. Management believes that investors may use these non-GAAP financial measures to analyze financial performance without the impact of unusual items that may obscure trends in the Company's underlying performance. These disclosures should not be viewed as a substitute for operating results determined in accordance with GAAP, nor are they necessarily comparable to non-GAAP performance measures that may be presented by other companies.
In several places net interest income is presented on a fully taxable-equivalent basis. Specifically included in interest income was tax-exempt interest income from certain investment securities and loans. An amount equal to the tax benefit derived from this tax exempt income has been added back to the interest income total which, as adjusted, increased net interest income accordingly. Management believes the disclosure of tax-equivalent net interest income information improves the clarity of financial analysis, and is particularly useful to investors in understanding and evaluating the changes and trends in the Company's results of operations. Other financial institutions commonly present net interest income on a tax-equivalent basis. This adjustment is considered helpful in the comparison of one financial institution's net interest income to that of another, as each will have a different proportion of tax-exempt interest from its earning assets. Moreover, net interest income is a component of a second financial measure commonly used by financial institutions, net interest margin, which is the ratio of net interest income to average earning assets. For purposes of this measure as well, other financial institutions generally use tax-equivalent net interest income to provide a better basis of comparison from institution to institution. The Company follows these practices. The following table provides a reconciliation of tax-equivalent financial information to the Company's consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP. A 35.0% tax rate was used in both
2015
and
2014
.
Page 44
For the nine months ended September 30,
For the quarters ended September 30,
Dollars in thousands
2015
2014
2015
2014
Net interest income as presented
$
30,291
$
29,550
$
10,511
$
10,004
Effect of tax-exempt income
2,332
2,668
775
844
Net interest income, tax equivalent
$
32,623
$
32,218
$
11,286
$
10,848
The Company presents its efficiency ratio using non-GAAP information. The GAAP-based efficiency ratio is noninterest expenses divided by net interest income plus noninterest income from the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income (Loss). The non-GAAP efficiency ratio excludes securities losses and other-than-temporary impairment charges from noninterest expenses, excludes securities gains from noninterest income, and adds the tax-equivalent adjustment to net interest income. The following table provides a reconciliation between the GAAP and non-GAAP efficiency ratio:
For the nine months ended September 30,
For the quarters ended September 30,
Dollars in thousands
2015
2014
2015
2014
Non-interest expense, as presented
$
21,952
$
22,345
$
7,707
$
7,802
Net interest income, as presented
30,291
29,550
10,511
10,004
Effect of tax-exempt income
2,332
2,668
775
844
Non-interest income, as presented
9,467
8,446
2,975
3,656
Effect of non-interest tax-exempt income
136
136
45
45
Net securities gains
(1,396
)
(1,145
)
(1
)
(1,105
)
Adjusted net interest income plus non-interest income
$
40,830
$
39,655
$
14,305
$
13,444
Non-GAAP efficiency ratio
53.76
%
56.35
%
53.88
%
58.03
%
GAAP efficiency ratio
55.21
%
58.81
%
57.15
%
57.12
%
The Company presents certain information based upon average tangible shareholders' common equity instead of total average shareholders' equity. The difference between these measures is the Company's intangible assets, specifically goodwill from prior acquisitions. Management, banking regulators and many stock analysts use the tangible common equity ratio and the tangible book value per common share in conjunction with more traditional bank capital ratios to compare the capital adequacy of banking organizations with significant amounts of goodwill or other intangible assets, typically stemming from the use of the purchase accounting method in accounting for mergers and acquisitions. The following table provides a reconciliation of average tangible shareholders' common equity to the Company's consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP:
For the nine months ended September 30,
For the quarters ended September 30,
Dollars in thousands
2015
2014
2015
2014
Average shareholders' equity as presented
$
165,421
$
155,917
$
166,572
$
159,717
Less intangible assets
(30,137
)
(30,379
)
(30,125
)
(30,379
)
Average tangible shareholders' common equity
$
135,284
$
125,538
$
136,447
$
129,338
Executive Summary
Net income for the
nine months ended September 30, 2015
was
$12.4 million
,
up
$1.2 million
or
10.2%
from the same period in
2014
. Earnings per common share on a fully diluted basis were
$1.16
for the
nine months ended September 30, 2015
,
up
$0.11
or
10.5%
from the
$1.05
posted for the same period in
2014
. For the quarter ended
September 30, 2015
, net income was
$4.2 million
,
up
$80,000
or
1.9%
from the same period in
2014
. Earnings per common share on a fully diluted basis were
$0.39
for the quarter ended
September 30, 2015
,
up
$0.01
or
2.6%
from the
$0.38
posted in
2014
. Compared to the previous quarter, net income was
up
$114,000
or
2.8%
and earnings per common share on a fully diluted basis were
up
$0.01
or
2.6%
.
This was another excellent quarter for The First Bancorp, Inc. with the best quarter in the Company's history and the third consecutive quarter with net income above $4.0 million. Higher net interest income driven by asset growth and lower operating costs are the major factors in our strong performance in 2015. We also maintained the quarterly dividend at 22 cents per share in the third quarter after increasing it by one cent in the second quarter.
Page 45
Net interest income on a tax-equivalent basis was
up
$405,000
or
1.3%
in the
nine months ended September 30, 2015
compared to the same period in
2014
. A $1.1 million increase in loan income and a $1.2 million decrease in funding cost more than offset the $1.9 million drop in investment income resulting from a smaller investment portfolio.
For the quarter ended
September 30, 2015
, net interest income on a tax-equivalent basis
increased
$438,000
or
4.0%
compared to the same period in
2014
. Compared to the previous quarter, net interest income on a tax-equivalent basis was
up
$434,000
or
4.0%
.
Non-interest income for the
nine months ended September 30, 2015
was
$1.0 million
or
12.1%
higher
than in the
nine months ended September 30, 2014
. This was primarily due to an increase in other operating income as well as strong mortgage origination and servicing income. Non-interest expense for the
nine months ended September 30, 2015
was
$393,000
or
1.8%
lower
than in the same period in
2014
, due to lower employee costs.
The other driver of our performance, credit quality, continues on the path of significant improvement that we have seen for the past several quarters. Non-performing assets stood at
0.65%
of total assets as of
September 30, 2015
- the lowest level seen since the second quarter of 2008, well below the
1.10%
of total assets as of
September 30, 2014
and down from
0.97%
as of
December 31, 2014
. Total past-due loans were
1.01%
of total loans as of
September 30, 2015
, compared to
1.29%
of total loans as of
December 31, 2014
, and
1.17%
as of
September 30, 2014
.
The provision for loan losses for the first
nine months
of
2015
was
$1.1 million
,
$250,000
or
29.4%
higher
than in the same period in
2014
. In the third quarter of 2015, however, we provisioned only $200,000 compared to $350,000 in the third quarter of 2014. Net loan chargeoffs for the
nine months ended September 30, 2015
were
$1.8 million
or
0.25%
of average loans on an annualized basis. This was up
$1.0 million
from net chargeoffs of
$723,000
or
0.11%
of average loans on an annualized basis for the
nine months ended September 30, 2014
. In early 2014 we had a large recovery which significantly reduced the amount provisioned, as well as net chargeoffs the first half of 2014. The allowance for loan losses
decreased
$667,000
between
December 31, 2014
and
September 30, 2015
, and is
1.00%
of loans outstanding as of
September 30, 2015
, down from
1.13%
at
December 31, 2014
and from
1.28%
a year ago.
Total assets have
increased
$57.5 million
or
3.9%
year-to-date. The loan portfolio
increased
$45.6 million
in the
nine months ended September 30, 2015
and
$55.0 million
from a year ago. The investment portfolio has
increased
$75,000
year-to-date and
decreased
$11.4 million
or
2.3%
from a year ago. On the liability side of the balance sheet, low-cost deposits have
increased
$95.1 million
or
19.9%
year-to-date and increased
$81.6 million
or
16.6%
over the past year. The year-to-date increase is in line with our normal seasonal fluctuation. Local certificates of deposit (CDs) decreased
$14.6 million
and wholesale CDs decreased
$59.8 million
over the past year.
Remaining well capitalized remains a top priority for The First Bancorp, Inc. Since December 31, 2008, the Company's total risk-based capital ratio has increased from 11.13% to
16.10%
, well above the well-capitalized threshold of 10.50% set by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
The Company's operating ratios remain good, with a return on average tangible common equity of
12.29%
for the
nine months ended September 30, 2015
compared to
12.02%
for the same period in
2014
. Based upon June 30, 2015 data, our return on average tangible common equity was in the top 23% of all banks in the UBPR peer group, which had an average return on equity of 9.49%. Our efficiency ratio continues to be an important component in our overall performance and
dropped
over 2.50% to
53.76%
for the
nine months ended September 30, 2015
, from
56.35%
for the same period in
2014
. This ratio remains well below the UBPR peer group average of 65.56% as of June 30, 2015.
Net Interest Income
Total interest income of
$37.8 million
for the
nine months ended September 30, 2015
was a
decrease
of
$460,000
or
1.2%
compared to total interest income of
$38.2 million
for the same period of
2014
. Total interest expense of
$7.5 million
for the
nine months ended September 30, 2015
is a
$1.2 million
or
13.8%
decrease
from total interest expense of
$8.7 million
for the
nine months ended September 30, 2014
. As a result, net interest income of
$30.3 million
for the
nine months ended September 30, 2015
was
an increase
of
$741,000
or
2.5%
compared to net interest income of
$29.6 million
for the same period ended
September 30, 2014
. The Company's net interest margin on a tax-equivalent basis
decreased
from
3.10%
for the
nine months ended September 30, 2014
to
3.09%
for the
nine months ended September 30, 2015
. Tax-exempt interest income amounted to
$4.3 million
for the
nine months ended September 30, 2015
and
$4.9 million
for the same period of
2014
.
Total interest income of
$12.8 million
for the quarter ended
September 30, 2015
is a
0.3%
decrease
from total interest income of
$12.9 million
in the comparable period of
2014
. Total interest expense of
$2.3 million
for the quarter ended
September 30, 2015
is a
19.0%
decrease
from total interest expense of
$2.9 million
for the comparable period of
2014
. As a result, net interest income
increased
5.1%
or
$507,000
to
$10.5 million
for the quarter ended
September 30, 2015
, from the
$10.0 million
reported for the same period in
2014
. The Company's net interest margin on a tax-equivalent basis
increased
from
3.07%
for the quarter ended
September 30, 2014
to
3.11%
for the quarter ended
September 30, 2015
. Tax-exempt interest income amounted to
$1.4 million
and
$1.6 million
for the quarters ended
September 30, 2015
and
2014
, respectively.
Page 46
The following tables present the amount of interest earned or paid, as well as the average yield or rate on an annualized basis, for each major category of assets or liabilities for the
nine months
and quarters ended
September 30, 2015
and
2014
. Tax-exempt income is calculated on a tax-equivalent basis, using a 35.0% tax rate in
2015
and
2014
.
For the nine months ended
September 30, 2015
September 30, 2014
Dollars in thousands
Amount of
interest
Average
Yield/Rate
Amount of interest
Average
Yield/Rate
Interest on earning assets
Interest-bearing deposits
$
16
0.25
%
$
4
0.26
%
Investments
12,607
3.71
%
14,533
3.87
%
Loans held for sale
12
3.71
%
8
3.88
%
Loans
27,469
3.88
%
26,355
3.98
%
Total interest income
40,104
3.80
%
40,900
3.93
%
Interest expense
Deposits
3,995
0.58
%
5,406
0.76
%
Other borrowings
3,486
1.62
%
3,276
1.65
%
Total interest expense
7,481
0.83
%
8,682
0.96
%
Net interest income
$
32,623
$
32,218
Interest rate spread
2.97
%
2.97
%
Net interest margin
3.09
%
3.10
%
For the quarters ended
September 30, 2015
September 30, 2014
Dollars in thousands
Amount of
interest
Average
Yield/Rate
Amount of
interest
Average
Yield/Rate
Interest on earning assets
Interest-bearing deposits
$
3
0.29
%
$
1
0.21
%
Investments
4,290
3.58
%
4,733
3.77
%
Loans held for sale
5
3.71
%
3
3.43
%
Loans
9,310
3.84
%
8,976
3.95
%
Total interest-earning assets
13,608
3.74
%
13,713
3.88
%
Interest expense
Deposits
1,236
0.52
%
1,777
0.75
%
Other borrowings
1,086
1.51
%
1,088
1.64
%
Total interest expense
2,322
0.75
%
2,865
0.94
%
Net interest income
$
11,286
$
10,848
Interest rate spread
2.99
%
2.94
%
Net interest margin
3.11
%
3.07
%
Page 47
The following tables present changes in interest income and expense attributable to changes in interest rates and volume for interest-earning assets and liabilities for the
nine months
and quarters ended
September 30, 2015
compared to
2014
. Tax-exempt income is calculated on a tax-equivalent basis, using a 35.0% tax rate in
2015
and
2014
.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to 2014
Dollars in thousands
Volume
Rate
Rate/Volume
1
Total
Interest on earning assets
Interest-bearing deposits
$
13
$
—
$
(1
)
$
12
Investment securities
(1,390
)
(593
)
57
(1,926
)
Loans held for sale
4
—
—
4
Loans
1,837
(675
)
(48
)
1,114
Change in interest income
464
(1,268
)
8
(796
)
Interest expense
Deposits
(151
)
(1,296
)
36
(1,411
)
Other borrowings
290
(74
)
(6
)
210
Change in interest expense
139
(1,370
)
30
(1,201
)
Change in net interest income
$
325
$
102
$
(22
)
$
405
1
Represents the change attributable to a combination of change in rate and change in volume.
For the quarter ended September 30, 2015 compared to 2014
Dollars in thousands
Volume
Rate
Rate/Volume
1
Total
Interest on earning assets
Interest-bearing deposits
$
2
$
—
$
—
$
2
Investment securities
(213
)
(241
)
11
(443
)
Loans held for sale
2
—
—
2
Loans
596
(246
)
(16
)
334
Change in interest income
387
(487
)
(5
)
(105
)
Interest expense
Deposits
(3
)
(539
)
1
(541
)
Other borrowings
95
(89
)
(8
)
(2
)
Change in interest expense
92
(628
)
(7
)
(543
)
Change in net interest income
$
295
$
141
$
2
$
438
Page 48
Average Daily Balance Sheets
The following table shows the Company's average daily balance sheets for the
nine months
and quarters ended
September 30, 2015
and
2014
.
For the nine months ended
For the quarters ended
Dollars in thousands
September 30,
2015
September 30,
2014
September 30,
2015
September 30,
2014
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents
$
14,907
$
15,837
$
15,736
$
17,177
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks
8,610
2,032
4,061
1,930
Securities available for sale
182,944
285,514
214,641
242,175
Securities to be held to maturity
257,306
202,767
247,373
242,230
Restricted equity securities, at cost
13,912
13,912
13,912
13,912
Loans held for sale
432
276
535
347
Loans
947,209
885,503
961,192
901,355
Allowance for loan losses
(10,066
)
(11,818
)
(9,841
)
(11,865
)
Net loans
937,143
873,685
951,351
889,490
Accrued interest receivable
5,083
5,265
4,963
4,997
Premises and equipment
22,197
22,572
21,922
22,265
Other real estate owned
2,565
4,853
2,273
4,793
Goodwill
29,805
29,805
29,805
29,805
Other assets
22,757
24,985
23,803
23,655
Total Assets
$
1,497,661
$
1,481,503
$
1,530,375
$
1,492,776
Liabilities & Shareholders' Equity
Demand deposits
$
110,420
$
101,787
$
122,999
$
113,941
NOW deposits
211,070
168,313
224,913
191,221
Money market deposits
100,649
91,266
100,668
97,288
Savings deposits
182,108
152,500
195,028
156,071
Certificates of deposit
426,089
534,249
420,333
497,990
Total deposits
1,030,336
1,048,115
1,063,941
1,056,511
Borrowed funds – short term
143,077
168,494
152,233
172,892
Borrowed funds – long term
145,136
96,263
133,762
90,143
Dividends payable
1,093
1,001
1,146
1,051
Other liabilities
12,598
11,713
12,722
12,462
Total Liabilities
1,332,240
1,325,586
1,363,804
1,333,059
Shareholders' Equity:
Common stock
107
107
107
107
Additional paid-in capital
59,361
58,679
59,548
58,898
Retained earnings
104,137
97,536
105,742
99,235
Net unrealized gain (loss) on securities available-for-sale
2,014
(590
)
1,388
1,299
Net unrealized loss on securities transferred from available for sale to held to maturity
(73
)
(3
)
(89
)
(10
)
Net unrealized gain (loss) on postretirement benefit costs
(125
)
188
(125
)
188
Total Shareholders' Equity
165,421
155,917
166,571
159,717
Total Liabilities & Shareholders' Equity
$
1,497,661
$
1,481,503
$
1,530,375
$
1,492,776
Page 49
Non-Interest Income
Non-interest income of
$9.5 million
for the
nine months ended September 30, 2015
is
an increase
of
$1.0 million
compared to the same period in
2014
. This was attributable to an increase in other operating income as well as strong mortgage origination and servicing income. Non-interest income was
$3.0 million
for the quarter ended
September 30, 2015
,
a decrease
of
18.6%
from the
$3.7 million
reported for the quarter ended
September 30, 2014
. This decrease was attributable to a decrease in net securities gains.
Non-Interest Expense
Non-interest expense of
$22.0 million
for the
nine months ended September 30, 2015
is
a decrease
of
1.8%
or
$393,000
compared to non-interest expense of
$22.3 million
for the same period in
2014
. This decrease was primarily due to lower employee costs. The Company's efficiency ratio has
dropped
more than 2.50% to
53.76%
for the
nine months ended September 30, 2015
from
56.35%
for the same period in
2014
. Noninterest expense of
$7.7 million
for the quarter ended
September 30, 2015
is
a decrease
of
1.2%
compared to non-interest expense of
$7.8 million
for the same period in
2014
due to the reason mentioned above.
Income Taxes
Income taxes on operating earnings were
$4.3 million
for the
nine months ended September 30, 2015
,
up
$751,000
from the same period in
2014
. This is in line with the increase in the Company's level of income before taxes.
Investments
The Company's investment portfolio
increased
by
$75,000
between
December 31, 2014
, and
September 30, 2015
. As of
September 30, 2015
, mortgage-backed securities had a carrying value of
$232.8 million
and a fair value of
$234.5 million
. Of this total, securities with a fair value of
$142.2
million or
60.6%
of the mortgage-backed portfolio were issued by the Government National Mortgage Association and securities with a fair value of
$92.3
million or
39.4%
of the mortgage-backed portfolio were issued by the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and the Federal National Mortgage Association.
The Company's investment securities are classified into two categories: securities available for sale and securities to be held to maturity. Securities available for sale consist primarily of debt securities which Management intends to hold for indefinite periods of time. They may be used as part of the Company's funds management strategy, and may be sold in response to changes in interest rates, prepayment risk and liquidity needs, to increase capital ratios, or for other similar reasons. Securities to be held to maturity consist primarily of debt securities that the Company has acquired solely for long-term investment purposes, rather than potential future sale. For securities to be categorized as held to maturity Management must have the intent and the Company must have the ability to hold such investments until their respective maturity dates. The Company does not hold trading account securities.
All investment securities are managed in accordance with a written investment policy adopted by the Board of Directors. It is the Company's general policy that investments for either portfolio be limited to government debt obligations, time deposits, and corporate bonds or commercial paper with one of the three highest ratings given by a nationally recognized rating agency. The portfolio is currently invested primarily in U.S. Government agency securities and tax-exempt obligations of states and political subdivisions. The individual securities have been selected to enhance the portfolio's overall yield while not materially adding to the Company's level of interest rate risk.
During the third quarter of 2014, the Company transferred securities with a total amortized cost of $89,780,000 and a corresponding fair value of $89,757,000 from available for sale to held to maturity. The net unrealized loss, net of taxes, on these securities at the date of the transfer was $15,000. The net unrealized holding loss at the time of transfer continues to be reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax and is amortized over the remaining lives of the securities as an adjustment of the yield. The amortization of the net unrealized loss reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) will offset the effect on interest income of the discount for the transferred securities. The remaining unamortized balance of the net unrealized losses for the securities transferred from available for sale to held to maturity was
$99,000
at
September 30, 2015
. These securities were transferred as a part of the Company's overall investment and balance sheet strategies.
Page 50
The following table sets forth the Company's investment securities at their carrying amounts as of
September 30, 2015
and
2014
and
December 31, 2014
.
Dollars in thousands
September 30,
2015
December 31,
2014
September 30,
2014
Securities available for sale
Mortgage-backed securities
$
187,510
$
151,855
$
157,750
State and political subdivisions
25,290
30,855
30,619
Other equity securities
3,133
2,551
2,551
$
215,933
$
185,261
$
190,920
Securities to be held to maturity
U.S. government-sponsored agencies
$
75,991
$
92,341
$
92,332
Mortgage-backed securities
45,287
57,003
61,138
State and political subdivisions
123,744
126,275
127,970
Corporate securities
300
300
300
$
245,322
$
275,919
$
281,740
Restricted equity securities
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock
$
12,875
$
12,875
$
12,875
Federal Reserve Bank Stock
1,037
1,037
1,037
$
13,912
$
13,912
$
13,912
Total securities
$
475,167
$
475,092
$
486,572
Page 51
The following table sets forth yields and contractual maturities of the Company's investment securities as of
September 30, 2015
. Yields on tax-exempt securities have been computed on a tax-equivalent basis using a tax rate of 35%. Mortgage-backed securities are presented according to their final contractual maturity date, while the calculated yield takes into effect the intermediate cash flows from repayment of principal which results in a much shorter average life.
Available For Sale
Held to Maturity
Dollars in thousands
Fair
Value
Yield to maturity
Amortized Cost
Yield to maturity
U.S. Government-Sponsored Agencies
Due in 1 year or less
$
—
0.00
%
$
—
0.00
%
Due in 1 to 5 years
—
0.00
%
—
0.00
%
Due in 5 to 10 years
—
0.00
%
5,355
2.43
%
Due after 10 years
—
0.00
%
70,636
3.27
%
Total
—
0.00
%
75,991
3.21
%
Mortgage-Backed Securities
Due in 1 year or less
937
3.64
%
—
0.00
%
Due in 1 to 5 years
8,745
2.88
%
513
6.08
%
Due in 5 to 10 years
7,360
3.18
%
20,785
2.63
%
Due after 10 years
170,468
2.58
%
23,989
3.76
%
Total
187,510
2.63
%
45,287
3.27
%
State & Political Subdivisions
Due in 1 year or less
—
0.00
%
1,362
6.70
%
Due in 1 to 5 years
332
6.31
%
6,048
6.33
%
Due in 5 to 10 years
2,512
6.26
%
22,955
6.15
%
Due after 10 years
22,446
5.77
%
93,379
5.04
%
Total
25,290
5.82
%
123,744
5.33
%
Corporate Securities
Due in 1 year or less
—
0.00
%
—
0.00
%
Due in 1 to 5 years
—
0.00
%
300
1.00
%
Due in 5 to 10 years
—
0.00
%
—
0.00
%
Due after 10 years
—
0.00
%
—
0.00
%
Total
—
0.00
%
300
1.00
%
Equity Securities
3,133
1.14
%
—
0.00
%
$
215,933
2.98
%
$
245,322
4.29
%
Impaired Securities
The securities portfolio contains certain securities that the amortized cost of which exceeds fair value, which at
September 30, 2015
amounted to
$2.3
million, or
0.50%
of the amortized cost of the total securities portfolio. At
December 31, 2014
this amount was
$2.9 million
, or
0.63%
of the amortized cost of total securities portfolio. As a part of the Company's ongoing security monitoring process, the Company identifies securities in an unrealized loss position that could potentially be other-than-temporarily impaired. If a decline in the fair value of a debt security is judged to be other-than-temporary, the decline related to credit loss is recorded in net realized securities losses while the decline attributable to other factors is recorded in other comprehensive income or loss.
The Company's evaluation of securities for impairment is a quantitative and qualitative process intended to determine whether declines in the fair value of investment securities should be recognized in current period earnings. The primary factors considered in evaluating whether a decline in the fair value of securities is other-than-temporary include: (a) the length of time and extent to which the fair value has been less than cost or amortized cost and the expected recovery period of the security, (b) the financial condition, credit rating and future prospects of the issuer, (c) whether the debtor is current on contractually obligated interest and principal payments, (d) the volatility of the securities market price, (e) the intent and ability of the Company to retain the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for recovery, which may be at maturity, and (f) any other information and observable data considered relevant in determining whether other-than-temporary impairment has occurred.
Page 52
The Company's best estimate of cash flows uses severe economic recession assumptions due to market uncertainty. The Company's assumptions include but are not limited to delinquencies, foreclosure levels and constant default rates on the underlying collateral, loss severity ratios, and constant prepayment rates. If the Company does not expect to receive 100% of future contractual principal and interest, an other-than-temporary impairment charge is recognized. Estimating future cash flows is a quantitative and qualitative process that incorporates information received from third party sources along with certain internal assumptions and judgments regarding the future performance of the underlying collateral.
As of
September 30, 2015
, the Company had temporarily impaired securities with a fair value of
$112.9 million
and unrealized losses of
$2.3 million
, as identified in the table below. This was down from
December 31, 2014
as a result of a shift in the yield curve and a corresponding increase in value of investment securities. Securities in a continuous unrealized loss position more than twelve months amounted to
$20.9 million
as of
September 30, 2015
, compared with
$111.7
million at
December 31, 2014
. The Company has concluded that these securities were not other-than-temporarily impaired. This conclusion was based on the issuer's continued satisfaction of the securities obligations in accordance with their contractual terms and the expectation that the issuer will continue to do so, Management's intent and ability to hold these securities for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value which may be at maturity, the expectation that the Company will receive 100% of future contractual cash flows, as well as the evaluation of the fundamentals of the issuer's financial condition and other objective evidence. The following table summarizes temporarily impaired securities and their approximate fair values at
September 30, 2015
:
Less than 12 months
12 months or more
Total
Dollars in thousands
Fair
Value (Estimated)
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value (Estimated)
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value (Estimated)
Unrealized
Losses
U.S. Government-sponsored agencies
$
46,621
$
(1,015
)
$
17,444
$
(556
)
$
64,065
$
(1,571
)
Mortgage-backed securities
30,713
(266
)
989
(63
)
31,702
(329
)
State and political subdivisions
14,417
(207
)
2,374
(130
)
16,791
(337
)
Other equity securities
264
(34
)
51
(2
)
315
(36
)
$
92,015
$
(1,522
)
$
20,858
$
(751
)
$
112,873
$
(2,273
)
For securities with unrealized losses, the following information was considered in determining that the securities were not other-than-temporarily impaired:
Securities issued by U.S. Government-sponsored agencies and enterprises.
As of
September 30, 2015
, there were
$1.6 million
of unrealized losses on these securities compared to
$2.1 million
unrealized losses as of
December 31, 2014
. All of these securities were credit rated "AAA" or "AA+" by the major credit rating agencies. Management believes that securities issued by U.S. Government-sponsored agencies and enterprises have minimal credit risk, as these agencies and enterprises play a vital role in the nation's financial markets and does not consider these securities to be other-than-temporarily impaired at
September 30, 2015
.
Mortgage-backed securities issued by U.S. Government agencies and U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises.
As of
September 30, 2015
, there were
$329,000
of unrealized losses on these securities compared with
$694,000
at
December 31, 2014
. All of these securities were credit rated "AAA" or "AA+" by the major credit rating agencies. Management believes that securities issued by U.S. Government agencies bear no credit risk because they are backed by the full faith and credit of the United States and that securities issued by U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises have minimal credit risk, as these agencies and enterprises play a vital role in the nation's financial markets. Management believes that the unrealized losses at
September 30, 2015
were attributable to changes in current market yields and spreads since the date the underlying securities were purchased, and does not consider these securities to be other-than-temporarily impaired at
September 30, 2015
. The Company also has the ability and intent to hold these securities until a recovery of their amortized cost, which may be at maturity.
Obligations of state and political subdivisions.
As of
September 30, 2015
, the total unrealized losses on municipal securities amounted to
$337,000
, compared with
$135,000
at
December 31, 2014
. Municipal securities are supported by the general taxing authority of the municipality and, in the cases of school districts, are generally supported by state aid. At
September 30, 2015
, all municipal bond issuers were current on contractually obligated interest and principal payments. The Company attributes the unrealized losses at
September 30, 2015
to changes in prevailing market yields and pricing spreads since the date the underlying securities were purchased, combined with current market liquidity conditions and the disruption in the financial markets in general. Accordingly, the Company does not consider these municipal securities to be other-than-temporarily impaired at
September 30, 2015
. The Company also has the ability and intent to hold these securities until a recovery of their amortized cost, which may be at maturity.
Page 53
Corporate securities.
There were no unrealized losses on corporate securities as of
September 30, 2015
, or at
December 31, 2014
. Corporate securities are dependent on the operating performance of the issuers. At
September 30, 2015
, all corporate bond issuers were current on contractually obligated interest and principal payments.
Other equity securities
. As of
September 30, 2015
, the total unrealized losses on other equity securities amounted to
$36,000
compared with
$4,000
at
December 31, 2014
. Other equity securities is comprised of common and preferred stock holdings. The unrealized losses were the result of normal market fluctuations for equity securities. Accordingly, the Company does not consider other equity securities to be other-than-temporarily impaired at
September 30, 2015
.
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock
The Bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank ("FHLB") of Boston, a cooperatively owned wholesale bank for housing and finance in the six New England States. As a requirement of membership in the FHLB, the Bank must own a minimum required amount of FHLB stock, calculated periodically based primarily on its level of borrowings from the FHLB. The Bank uses the FHLB for much of its wholesale funding needs. As of
September 30, 2015
and
December 31, 2014
, the Bank's investment in FHLB stock totaled
$12.9 million
. FHLB stock is a non-marketable equity security and therefore is reported at cost, which equals par value. The Company periodically evaluates its investment in FHLB stock for impairment based on, among other factors, the capital adequacy of the FHLB and its overall financial condition. No impairment losses have been recorded through
September 30, 2015
. The Bank will continue to monitor its investment in FHLB stock.
Loans Held for Sale
Loans held for sale are carried at the lower of cost or market value. As of
September 30, 2015
, the Bank had
$200,000
in loans held for sale. This compares to no loans at
December 31, 2014
and
$383,000
at
September 30, 2014
. The Bank participates in FHLB's Mortgage Partnership Finance Program ("MPF"), selling loans with recourse. The volume of loans sold to date through the MPF program is de minimis; therefore, there was minimum impact on the reserve.
Loans
The loan portfolio
increased
during the first
nine months
of
2015
, with total loans at
$963.2 million
at
September 30, 2015
,
up
$45.6 million
or
5.0%
from total loans of
$917.6 million
at
December 31, 2014
. Commercial loans
increased
$33.7 million
or
8.9%
between
December 31, 2014
and
September 30, 2015
, municipal loans
increased
$1.0 million
or
4.7%
, residential term loans
increased
$1.1 million
or
0.3%
and home equity lines of credit
increased
$5.9 million
or
5.7%
.
Commercial loans are comprised of three major classes, commercial real estate loans, commercial construction loans and other commercial loans. Commercial real estate is primarily comprised of loans to small businesses collateralized by owner-occupied real estate, while other commercial is primarily comprised of loans to small businesses collateralized by plant and equipment, commercial fishing vessels and gear, and limited inventory-based lending.Commercial real estate loans typically have a maximum loan-to-value of 80% based upon current appraisal information at the time the loan is made. Land and land development loans typically have a maximum loan-to-value of 65% to 75% based upon current appraisal information at the time the loan is made. Construction, land and land improvement loans, both commercial and residential, comprise a small portion of the portfolio, and at
25.0%
of capital are well under the regulatory guidance of 100.0% of capital. Construction loans and non-owner-occupied commercial real estate loans are at
99.1%
of total capital, well under the regulatory guidance of 300.0% of capital. Municipal loans are comprised of loans to municipalities in the State of Maine for capitalized expenditures, construction projects or tax-anticipation notes. All municipal loans are considered general obligations of the municipality and as such are collateralized by the taxing ability of the municipality for repayment of debt.
Residential loans are also comprised of two classes, term loans, which include traditional amortizing home mortgages, and construction loans, which include loans for owner-occupied residential construction. Residential loans typically have a 75% to 80% loan to value based upon current appraisal information at the time the loan is made. Consumer loans are primarily amortizing loans to individuals collateralized by automobiles, pleasure craft and recreation vehicles, typically with a maximum loan to value of 80% to 90% of the purchase price of the collateral. Consumer loans also include a small amount of unsecured short-term time notes to individuals.
Page 54
The following table summarizes the loan portfolio, by class, at
September 30, 2015
and
2014
and
December 31, 2014
.
Dollars in thousands
September 30, 2015
December 31, 2014
September 30, 2014
Commercial
Real estate
$
268,741
27.9
%
$
242,311
26.4
%
$
243,936
26.8
%
Construction
23,624
2.5
%
30,932
3.4
%
26,954
3.0
%
Other
119,097
12.4
%
104,531
11.4
%
97,651
10.8
%
Municipal
21,377
2.2
%
20,424
2.2
%
20,722
2.3
%
Residential
Term
385,145
39.9
%
384,032
41.9
%
386,768
42.6
%
Construction
12,029
1.2
%
12,160
1.3
%
12,253
1.3
%
Home equity line of credit
109,390
11.4
%
103,521
11.3
%
101,094
11.1
%
Consumer
23,748
2.5
%
19,653
2.1
%
18,737
2.1
%
Total loans
$
963,151
100.0
%
$
917,564
100.0
%
$
908,115
100.0
%
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the contractual maturities of the Bank's loan portfolio as of
September 30, 2015
.
Dollars in thousands
< 1 Year
1 - 5 Years
5 - 10 Years
> 10 Years
Total
Commercial
Real estate
$
11,144
$
11,153
$
23,552
$
222,892
$
268,741
Construction
957
3,709
3,118
15,840
23,624
Other
6,931
38,938
23,898
49,330
119,097
Municipal
4,895
3,907
6,623
5,952
21,377
Residential
Term
1,320
6,530
14,661
362,634
385,145
Construction
897
557
—
10,575
12,029
Home equity line of credit
487
281
1,837
106,785
109,390
Consumer
7,262
5,226
2,332
8,928
23,748
Total loans
$
33,893
$
70,301
$
76,021
$
782,936
$
963,151
The following table provides a listing of loans by class, between variable and fixed rates as of
September 30, 2015
.
Fixed-Rate
Adjustable-Rate
Total
Dollars in thousands
Amount
% of total
Amount
% of total
Amount
% of total
Commercial
Real estate
$
35,821
3.7
%
$
232,920
24.2
%
$
268,741
27.9
%
Construction
2,755
0.3
%
20,869
2.2
%
23,624
2.5
%
Other
41,717
4.3
%
77,380
8.1
%
119,097
12.4
%
Municipal
19,310
2.0
%
2,067
0.2
%
21,377
2.2
%
Residential
Term
254,427
26.4
%
130,718
13.5
%
385,145
39.9
%
Construction
10,295
1.0
%
1,734
0.2
%
12,029
1.2
%
Home equity line of credit
1,171
0.1
%
108,219
11.3
%
109,390
11.4
%
Consumer
18,938
2.0
%
4,810
0.5
%
23,748
2.5
%
Total loans
$
384,434
39.8
%
$
578,717
60.2
%
$
963,151
100.0
%
Loan Concentrations
As of
September 30, 2015
, the Bank did not have any concentration of loans in one particular industry that exceeded 10% of its total loan portfolio.
Page 55
Credit Risk Management and Allowance for Loan Losses
Credit risk is the risk of loss arising from the inability of a borrower to meet its obligations. We manage credit risk by evaluating the risk profile of the borrower, repayment sources, the nature of the underlying collateral, and other support given current events, conditions, and expectations. We attempt to manage the risk characteristics of our loan portfolio through various control processes, such as credit evaluation of borrowers, establishment of lending limits, and application of lending procedures, including the holding of adequate collateral and the maintenance of compensating balances. However, we seek to rely primarily on the cash flow of our borrowers as the principal source of repayment. Although credit policies and evaluation processes are designed to minimize our risk, Management recognizes that loan losses will occur and the amount of these losses will fluctuate depending on the risk characteristics of our loan portfolio, as well as general and regional economic conditions.
We provide for loan losses through the establishment of an allowance for loan losses which represents an estimated reserve for existing losses in the loan portfolio. We deploy a systematic methodology for determining our allowance that includes a quarterly review process, risk rating, and adjustment to our allowance. We classify our portfolios as either commercial or residential and consumer and monitor credit risk separately as discussed below. We evaluate the appropriateness of our allowance continually based on a review of all significant loans, with a particular emphasis on nonaccruing, past due, and other loans that we believe require special attention.
The allowance consists of four elements: (1) specific reserves for loans evaluated individually for impairment; (2) general reserves for types or portfolios of loans based on historical loan loss experience; (3) qualitative reserves judgmentally adjusted for local and national economic conditions, concentrations, portfolio composition, volume and severity of delinquencies and nonaccrual loans, trends of criticized and classified loans, changes in credit policies, and underwriting standards, credit administration practices, and other factors as applicable; and (4) unallocated reserves. All outstanding loans are considered in evaluating the appropriateness of the allowance.
Appropriateness of the allowance for loan losses is determined using a consistent, systematic methodology, which analyzes the risk inherent in the loan portfolio. In addition to evaluating the collectability of specific loans when determining the appropriateness of the allowance for loan losses, Management also takes into consideration other factors such as changes in the mix and size of the loan portfolio, historic loss experience, the amount of delinquencies and loans adversely classified, economic trends, changes in credit policies, and experience, ability and depth of lending management. The appropriateness of the allowance for loan losses is assessed by an allocation process whereby specific reserve allocations are made against certain adversely classified loans, and general reserve allocations are made against segments of the loan portfolio which have similar attributes. The Company's historical loss experience, industry trends, and the impact of the local and regional economy on the Company's borrowers, are considered by Management in determining the appropriateness of the allowance for loan losses.
The allowance for loan losses is increased by provisions charged against current earnings. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when Management believes that the collectability of the loan principal is unlikely. Recoveries on loans previously charged off are credited to the allowance. While Management uses available information to assess possible losses on loans, future additions to the allowance may be necessary based on increases in non-performing loans, changes in economic conditions, growth in loan portfolios, or for other reasons. Any future additions to the allowance would be recognized in the period in which they were determined to be necessary. In addition, various regulatory agencies periodically review the Company's allowance for loan losses as an integral part of their examination process. Such agencies may require the Company to record additions to the allowance based on judgments different from those of Management.
Commercial
Our commercial portfolio includes all secured and unsecured loans to borrowers for commercial purposes, including commercial lines of credit and commercial real estate. Our process for evaluating commercial loans includes performing updates on loans that we have rated for risk. Our non-performing commercial loans are generally reviewed individually to determine impairment, accrual status, and the need for specific reserves. Our methodology incorporates a variety of risk considerations, both qualitative and quantitative. Quantitative factors include our historical loss experience by loan type, collateral values, financial condition of borrowers, and other factors. Qualitative factors include judgments concerning general economic conditions that may affect credit quality, credit concentrations, the pace of portfolio growth, and delinquency levels; these qualitative factors are also considered in connection with our unallocated portion of our allowance for loan losses.
The process of establishing the allowance with respect to our commercial loan portfolio begins when a loan officer initially assigns each loan a risk rating, using established credit criteria. Approximately 50% of our outstanding loans and commitments are subject to review and validation annually by an independent consulting firm, as well as periodically by our internal credit review function. Our methodology employs Management's judgment as to the level of losses on existing loans based on our internal review of the loan portfolio, including an analysis of the borrowers' current financial position, and the consideration of current and anticipated economic conditions and their potential effects on specific borrowers and or lines of business. In determining our ability to collect certain loans, we also consider the fair value of any underlying collateral. We also evaluate
Page 56
credit risk concentrations, including trends in large dollar exposures to related borrowers, industry and geographic concentrations, and economic and environmental factors.
Residential, Home Equity and Consumer
Consumer, home equity and residential mortgage loans are generally segregated into homogeneous pools with similar risk characteristics. Trends and current conditions in these pools are analyzed and historical loss experience is adjusted accordingly. Quantitative and qualitative adjustment factors for the consumer, home equity and residential mortgage portfolios are consistent with those for the commercial portfolios. Certain loans in the consumer and residential portfolios identified as having the potential for further deterioration are analyzed individually to confirm the appropriate risk status and accrual status, and to determine the need for a specific reserve. Consumer loans that are greater than 120 days past due are generally charged off. Residential loans and home equity lines of credit that are greater than 90 days past due are evaluated for collateral adequacy and if deficient are placed on non-accrual status.
Unallocated
The unallocated portion of the allowance is intended to provide for losses that are not identified when establishing the specific and general portions of the allowance and is based upon Management's evaluation of various conditions that are not directly measured in the determination of the portfolio and loan specific allowances. Such conditions may include general economic and business conditions affecting our lending area, credit quality trends (including trends in delinquencies and nonperforming loans expected to result from existing conditions), loan volumes and concentrations, duration of the current business cycle, bank regulatory examination results, findings of external loan review examiners, and Management's judgment with respect to various other conditions including loan administration and management and the quality of risk identification systems. Management reviews these conditions quarterly. We have risk management practices designed to ensure timely identification of changes in loan risk profiles; however, undetected losses may exist inherently within the loan portfolio. The judgmental aspects involved in applying the risk grading criteria, analyzing the quality of individual loans, and assessing collateral values can also contribute to undetected, but probable, losses. The increase in the unallocated portion is due to increased loan demand in comparison to previous years. Management feels the increase in the unallocated portion is directionally consistent with this change in demand.
The allowance for loan losses includes reserve amounts assigned to individual loans on the basis of loan impairment. Certain loans are evaluated individually and are judged to be impaired when Management believes it is probable that the Company will not collect all of the contractual interest and principal payments as scheduled in the loan agreement. Under this method, loans are selected for evaluation based on internal risk ratings or non-accrual status. A specific reserve is allocated to an individual loan when that loan has been deemed impaired and when the amount of a probable loss is estimable on the basis of its collateral value, the present value of anticipated future cash flows, or its net realizable value. At
September 30, 2015
, impaired loans with specific reserves totaled
$9.6 million
and the amount of such reserves was
$826,000
. This compares to impaired loans with specific reserves of
$9.5 million
at
December 31, 2014
and the amount of such reserves was
$1.8 million
.
All of these analyses are reviewed and discussed by the Directors' Loan Committee, and recommendations from these processes provide Management and the Board of Directors with independent information on loan portfolio condition. Our total allowance at
September 30, 2015
is considered by Management to be appropriate to address the credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio at that date. Management views the level of the allowance for loan losses as appropriate. However, our determination of the appropriate allowance level is based upon a number of assumptions we make about future events, which we believe are reasonable, but which may or may not prove valid. Thus, there can be no assurance that our charge-offs in future periods will not exceed our allowance for loan losses or that we will not need to make additional increases in our allowance for loan losses.
Page 57
The following table summarizes our allocation of allowance by loan class as of
September 30, 2015
and
2014
and
December 31, 2014
. The percentages are the portion of each loan class to total loans.
Dollars in thousands
September 30, 2015
December 31, 2014
September 30, 2014
Commercial
Real estate
$
3,151
27.9
%
$
3,532
26.4
%
$
4,221
26.8
%
Construction
558
2.5
%
823
3.4
%
767
3.0
%
Other
1,376
12.4
%
1,505
11.4
%
1,942
10.8
%
Municipal
16
2.2
%
15
2.2
%
15
2.3
%
Residential
Term
1,165
39.9
%
1,185
41.9
%
1,320
42.6
%
Construction
22
1.2
%
20
1.3
%
20
1.3
%
Home equity line of credit
901
11.4
%
1,060
11.3
%
735
11.1
%
Consumer
562
2.5
%
542
2.1
%
508
2.1
%
Unallocated
1,926
—
%
1,662
—
%
2,113
—
%
Total
$
9,677
100.0
%
$
10,344
100.0
%
$
11,641
100.0
%
The allowance for loan losses totaled
$9.7 million
at
September 30, 2015
, compared to
$10.3 million
as of
December 31, 2014
and
$11.6 million
as of
September 30, 2014
. Management's ongoing application of methodologies to establish the allowance include an evaluation of impaired loans for specific reserves. These specific reserves decreased
$977,000
in the first
nine months
of
2015
from
$1.8 million
at
December 31, 2014
to
$0.8 million
at
September 30, 2015
. The specific loans that make up those categories change from period to period. Impairment on those loans, which would be reflected in the allowance for loan losses, might or might not exist, depending on the specific circumstances of each loan. The portion of the reserve based upon homogeneous pools of loans decreased by
$419,000
in the first
nine months
of
2015
. This decline was due to a reduction in classified pool balances from
December 31, 2014
and a lower level of historical loss averages. The portion of the reserve based on qualitative factors increased by
$465,000
in the first
nine months
of
2015
as a result of adjustments for several qualitative factors. After consideration of the shifts in specific, pooled and qualitative reserves, Management determined that market trends and other internal factors warranted the
$264,000
increase in unallocated reserves in the first
nine months
of
2015
from
$1.7 million
at
December 31, 2014
to
$1.9 million
at
September 30, 2015
.
A breakdown of the allowance for loan losses as of
September 30, 2015
, by loan class and allowance element, is presented in the following table:
Dollars in thousands
Specific Reserves on Loans Evaluated Individually for Impairment
General Reserves on Loans Based on Historical Loss Experience
Reserves for Qualitative Factors
Unallocated
Reserves
Total Reserves
Commercial
Real estate
$
71
$
1,094
$
1,986
$
—
$
3,151
Construction
282
98
178
—
558
Other
8
486
882
—
1,376
Municipal
—
—
16
—
16
Residential
Term
435
300
430
—
1,165
Construction
—
9
13
—
22
Home equity line of credit
30
530
341
—
901
Consumer
—
346
216
—
562
Unallocated
—
—
—
1,926
1,926
$
826
$
2,863
$
4,062
$
1,926
$
9,677
Based upon Management's evaluation, provisions are made to maintain the allowance as a best estimate of inherent losses within the portfolio. The provision for loan losses to maintain the allowance was
$1,100,000
for the first
nine months
of
2015
,
an increase
of
$250,000
from the first
nine months
of
2014
. Net chargeoffs were
$1,767,000
in the first
nine months
of
2015
Page 58
compared to net chargeoffs of
$723,000
in the first
nine months
of
2014
. Our allowance as a percentage of outstanding loans was
1.00%
as of
September 30, 2015
, down from
1.13%
at
December 31, 2014
, and down from
1.28%
a year ago.
The following table summarizes the activities in our allowance for loan losses for the
nine months
ended
September 30, 2015
and
2014
and for the year ended
December 31, 2014
:
Dollars in thousands
September 30, 2015
December 31, 2014
September 30, 2014
Balance at beginning of year
$
10,344
$
11,514
$
11,514
Loans charged off:
Commercial
Real estate
254
1,205
530
Construction
9
—
—
Other
732
989
244
Municipal
—
—
—
Residential
Term
187
699
446
Construction
—
—
—
Home equity line of credit
532
153
153
Consumer
282
449
390
Total
1,996
3,495
1,763
Recoveries on loans previously charged off
Commercial
Real estate
1
144
108
Construction
—
—
—
Other
66
758
736
Municipal
—
—
—
Residential
—
Term
37
36
32
Construction
—
25
—
Home equity line of credit
31
16
15
Consumer
94
196
149
Total
229
1,175
1,040
Net loans charged off
1,767
2,320
723
Provision for loan losses
1,100
1,150
850
Balance at end of period
$
9,677
$
10,344
$
11,641
Ratio of net loans charged off to average loans outstanding
1
0.25
%
0.26
%
0.11
%
Ratio of allowance for loan losses to total loans outstanding
1.00
%
1.13
%
1.28
%
1
Ratios for both years have been annualized on a 365-day basis.
Management believes the allowance for loan losses is appropriate as of
September 30, 2015
. In Management's opinion, the level of the provision for loan losses is directionally consistent with the overall credit quality of our loan portfolio and corresponding levels of nonperforming loans, as well as with the performance of the national and local economies, higher levels of unemployment and the outlook for slow economic conditions continuing for some time to come.
Nonperforming Loans
Nonperforming loans are comprised of loans, for which based on current information and events, it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement or when principal and interest is 90 days or more past due unless the loan is both well secured and in the process of collection (in which case the loan may continue to accrue interest in spite of its past due status). A loan is "well secured" if it is secured (1) by collateral in the form of liens on
Page 59
or pledges of real or personal property, including securities, that have a realizable value sufficient to discharge the debt (including accrued interest) in full, or (2) by the guarantee of a financially responsible party. A loan is "in the process of collection" if collection of the loan is proceeding in due course either (1) through legal action, including judgment enforcement procedures, or, (2) in appropriate circumstances, through collection efforts not involving legal action which are reasonably expected to result in repayment of the debt or in its restoration to a current status in the near future.
When a loan becomes nonperforming (generally 90 days past due), it is evaluated for collateral dependency based upon the most recent appraisal or other evaluation method. If the collateral value is lower than the outstanding loan balance plus accrued interest and estimated selling costs, the loan is placed on non-accrual status, all accrued interest is reversed from interest income, and a specific reserve is established for the difference between the loan balance and the collateral value less selling costs, or, in certain situations, the difference between the loan balance and the collateral value less selling costs is written off. Concurrently, a new appraisal or valuation may be ordered, depending on collateral type, currency of the most recent valuation, the size of the loan, and other factors appropriate to the loan. Upon receipt and acceptance of the new valuation, the loan may have an additional specific reserve or write down based on the updated collateral value. On an ongoing basis, appraisals or valuations may be done periodically on collateral dependent non-performing loans and an additional specific reserve or write down will be made, if appropriate, based on the new collateral value.
Once a loan is placed on nonaccrual, it remains in nonaccrual status until the loan is current as to payment of both principal and interest and the borrower demonstrates the ability to pay and remain current. All payments made on nonaccrual loans are applied to the principal balance of the loan.
Nonperforming loans, expressed as a percentage of total loans, totaled
0.83%
at
September 30, 2015
compared to
1.15%
at
December 31, 2014
and
1.30%
at
September 30, 2014
. The following table shows the distribution of nonperforming loans by class as of
September 30, 2015
and
2014
and
December 31, 2014
:
Dollars in thousands
September 30,
2015
December 31,
2014
September 30,
2014
Commercial
Real estate
$
1,220
$
2,088
$
2,866
Construction
208
208
208
Other
114
935
1,800
Municipal
—
—
—
Residential
Term
5,491
6,421
6,166
Construction
—
—
—
Home equity line of credit
948
832
759
Consumer
—
26
26
Total nonperforming loans
$
7,981
$
10,510
$
11,825
Total nonperforming loans does not include loans 90 or more days past due and still accruing interest. These are loans for which we expect to collect all amounts due, including past-due interest. As of
September 30, 2015
, loans 90 or more days past due and still accruing interest totaled
$109,000
, compared to
$181,000
at
December 31, 2014
and
$452,000
at
September 30, 2014
.
Troubled Debt Restructured
A troubled debt restructured ("TDR") constitutes a restructuring of debt if the Bank, for economic or legal reasons related to the borrower's financial difficulties, grants a concession to the borrower that it would not otherwise consider. To determine whether or not a loan should be classified as a TDR, Management evaluates a loan based upon the following criteria:
•
The borrower demonstrates financial difficulty; common indicators include past due status with bank obligations, substandard credit bureau reports, or an inability to refinance with another lender, and
•
The Bank has granted a concession; common concession types include maturity date extension, interest rate adjustments to below market pricing, and deferment of payments.
Our overall level of TDRs
decreased
during the first
nine months
of
2015
. As of
September 30, 2015
, we had
88
loans with a value of
$24.7 million
that have been restructured. This compares to
94
loans with a value of
$27.2 million
and
96
loans with a value of
$27.9 million
classified as TDRs as of
December 31, 2014
and
September 30, 2014
, respectively.
Page 60
The following table shows the activity in loans classified as TDRs between
December 31, 2014
and
September 30, 2015
:
Balance in Thousands of Dollars
Number of Loans
Aggregate Balance
Total at December 31, 2014
94
$
27,214
Added in 2015
1
108
Removed in 2015
(7
)
(1,574
)
Repayments in 2015
—
(1,033
)
Total at September 30, 2015
88
$
24,715
As of
September 30, 2015
,
71
loans with an aggregate balance of
$21.9 million
were performing under the modified terms,
three
loans with an aggregate balance of
$887,000
were more than 30 days past due and accruing and
14
loans with an aggregate balance of
$1.9 million
were on nonaccrual. As a percentage of aggregate outstanding balance,
88.7%
were performing under the modified terms,
3.6%
were more than 30 days past due and accruing and
7.7%
were on nonaccrual. The performance status of all TDRs as of
September 30, 2015
, as well as the associated specific reserve in the allowance for loan losses, is summarized by type of loan in the following table.
In thousands of dollars
Performing
As Modified
30+ Days Past Due
and Accruing
On
Nonaccrual
All
TDRs
Commercial
Real estate
$
10,007
$
—
$
689
$
10,696
Construction
788
—
—
788
Other
1,621
—
—
1,621
Municipal
—
—
—
—
Residential
Term
8,897
887
1,053
10,837
Construction
—
—
—
—
Home equity line of credit
602
—
171
773
Consumer
—
—
—
—
$
21,915
$
887
$
1,913
$
24,715
Percent of balance
88.7
%
3.6
%
7.7
%
100.0
%
Number of loans
71
3
14
88
Associated specific reserve
$
372
$
93
$
59
$
524
Residential TDRs (including home equity lines of credit) as of
September 30, 2015
included 58 loans with an aggregate balance of $11.6 million, and the modifications granted fell into five major categories. Loans totaling $7.1 million had an extension of term, allowing the borrower to repay over an extended number of years and lowering the monthly payment to a level the borrower can afford. Loans totaling $4.0 million had interest capitalized, allowing the borrower to become current after unpaid interest was added to the balance of the loan and re-amortized over the remaining life of the loan. Loans with an aggregate balance of $618,000 were converted from interest-only to regular principal-and-interest payments based on the borrowers' ability to service the higher payment amount. Short-term rate concessions were granted on loans totaling $1.9 million, with a rate concession typically of 1.0% or less. Loans with an aggregate balance of $2.6 million were involved in bankruptcy. Certain residential TDRs had more than one modification.
Commercial TDRs as of
September 30, 2015
were comprised of 30 loans with a balance of $13.1 million. Of this total, 19 loans with an aggregate balance of $9.3 million had an extended period of interest-only payments, deferring the start of principal repayment. Six loans with an aggregate balance of $2.3 million had an extension of term, allowing the borrower to repay over an extended number of years and lowering the monthly payment to a level the borrower can afford. The remaining five loans with an aggregate balance of $1.5 million had several different modifications.
In each case when a loan was modified, Management determined it was in the Bank's best interest to work with the borrower with modified terms rather than to proceed to foreclosure. Once a loan is classified as a TDR, however, it remains classified as such until the balance is fully repaid, despite whether the loan is performing under the modified terms. As of
September 30, 2015
, Management is aware of
eight
loans classified as TDRs that are involved in bankruptcy with an outstanding balance of
$1.2 million
. There were also
14
loans with an outstanding balance of
$1.9 million
that were classified as TDRs and on non-accrual status.
Three
loans with an outstanding balance of
$265,000
, were in the process of foreclosure.
Page 61
Impaired Loans
Impaired loans include restructured loans and loans placed on non-accrual status. These loans are measured at the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan's effective interest rate or at the fair value of the collateral less estimated selling costs if the loan is collateral dependent. If the measure of an impaired loan is lower than the recorded investment in the loan, a specific reserve is established for the difference. Impaired loans totaled
$30.8 million
at
September 30, 2015
, and have decreased
$5.1 million
from
December 31, 2014
. The number of loans decreased by
31
from
181
to
150
during the same period. Impaired commercial loans decreased
$3.7 million
between
December 31, 2014
and
September 30, 2015
. The specific allowance for impaired commercial loans decreased from
$888,000
at
December 31, 2014
to
$361,000
as of
September 30, 2015
, which represented the fair value deficiencies for loans where the fair value of the collateral or net present value of expected cash flows was estimated at less than our carrying amount of the loan. From
December 31, 2014
to
September 30, 2015
, impaired residential loans decreased
$847,000
and impaired home equity lines of credit decreased
$537,000
.
The following table sets forth impaired loans as of
September 30, 2015
and
2014
and
December 31, 2014
:
Dollars in thousands
September 30,
2015
December 31,
2014
September 30,
2014
Commercial
Real estate
$
11,228
$
13,304
$
14,418
Construction
996
1,380
1,380
Other
1,736
2,942
3,892
Municipal
—
—
—
Residential
Term
15,276
16,123
15,896
Construction
—
—
—
Home equity line of credit
1,550
2,087
1,384
Consumer
—
26
26
Total
$
30,786
$
35,862
$
36,996
Past Due Loans
The Bank's overall loan delinquency ratio was
1.01%
at
September 30, 2015
compared to
1.29%
at
December 31, 2014
and
1.17%
at
September 30, 2014
. Loans 90 days delinquent and accruing decreased from
$181,000
at
December 31, 2014
to
$109,000
as of
September 30, 2015
. The following table sets forth loan delinquencies as of
September 30, 2015
and
2014
and
December 31, 2014
:
Dollars in thousands
September 30,
2015
December 31,
2014
September 30,
2014
Commercial
Real estate
$
1,056
$
860
$
1,336
Construction
239
249
208
Other
10
1,193
619
Municipal
—
—
—
Residential
Term
6,950
7,003
6,910
Construction
—
—
—
Home equity line of credit
1,195
2,122
1,359
Consumer
308
436
188
Total
$
9,758
$
11,863
$
10,620
Loans 30-89 days past due to total loans
0.61
%
0.69
%
0.45
%
Loans 90+ days past due and accruing to total loans
0.01
%
0.02
%
0.05
%
Loans 90+ days past due on non-accrual to total loans
0.39
%
0.58
%
0.67
%
Total past due loans to total loans
1.01
%
1.29
%
1.17
%
Page 62
Potential Problem Loans and Loans in Process of Foreclosure
Potential problem loans consist of classified accruing commercial and commercial real estate loans that were between 30 and 89 days past due. Such loans are characterized by weaknesses in the financial condition of borrowers or collateral deficiencies. Based on historical experience, the credit quality of some of these loans may improve due to improvements in the economy as well as changes in collateral values or the financial condition of the borrowers, while the credit quality of other loans may deteriorate, resulting in some amount of loss. At
September 30, 2015
, there were
four
potential problem loans with a balance of
$0.9 million
or
0.09%
of total loans. This compares to
three
loans with a balance of
$387,000
or
0.04%
of total loans at
December 31, 2014
.
As of
September 30, 2015
, there were
25
loans in the process of foreclosure with a total balance of
$2.6
million. The Bank's foreclosure process begins when a loan becomes 45 days past due at which time a preliminary foreclosure letter is sent to the borrower. If the loan becomes 80 days past due, copies of the promissory note and mortgage deed are forwarded to the Bank's attorney for review and an affidavit for a Motion for Summary Judgment is then prepared. An authorized Bank officer signs the affidavit certifying the validity of the documents and verification of the past due amount which is then forwarded to the court. Once a Motion for Summary Judgment is granted, a Period of Redemption (POR) begins which gives the customer 90 days to cure the default. A foreclosure auction date is then set 30 days from the POR expiration date if the default is not cured.
In July 2015, the Bank conducted a self-audit of its loans in foreclosure and its foreclosure process and found there were no deficiencies or areas to improve.
For loans sold to the secondary market on which servicing is retained, the Bank follows Freddie Mac's and Fannie Mae's published guidelines and regularly reviews these guidelines for updates and changes to process. All secondary market loans have been sold without recourse in a non-securitized, one-on-one basis. As a result, the Bank has no liability for these loans in the event of a foreclosure.
Other Real Estate Owned
Other real estate owned and repossessed assets ("OREO") are comprised of properties or other assets acquired through a foreclosure proceeding, or acceptance of a deed or title in lieu of foreclosure. Real estate acquired through foreclosure is carried at the lower of fair value less estimated cost to sell or the cost of the asset and is not included as part of the allowance for loan loss totals. At
September 30, 2015
, there were
17
properties owned with a net OREO balance of
$1.9 million
, net of an allowance for losses of
$409,000
, compared to
December 31, 2014
when there were
28
properties owned with a net OREO balance of
$3.8 million
, net of an allowance for losses of
$654,000
and
September 30, 2014
when there were
30
properties owned with a net OREO balance of
$4.6 million
, net of an allowance for losses of
$533,000
.
Page 63
The following table presents the composition of other real estate owned:
Dollars in thousands
September 30,
2015
December 31,
2014
September 30,
2014
Carrying Value
Commercial
Real estate
$
—
$
145
$
145
Construction
81
151
176
Other
931
888
716
Municipal
—
—
—
Residential
Term
1,313
3,255
4,053
Construction
—
—
—
Home equity line of credit
—
—
—
Consumer
—
—
—
Total
$
2,325
$
4,439
$
5,090
Related Allowance
Commercial
Real estate
$
—
$
75
$
75
Construction
45
17
8
Other
67
170
156
Municipal
—
—
—
Residential
Term
297
392
294
Construction
—
—
—
Home equity line of credit
—
—
—
Consumer
—
—
—
Total
$
409
$
654
$
533
Net Value
Commercial
Real estate
$
—
$
70
$
70
Construction
36
134
168
Other
864
718
560
Municipal
—
—
—
Residential
Term
1,016
2,863
3,759
Construction
—
—
—
Home equity line of credit
—
—
—
Consumer
—
—
—
Total
$
1,916
$
3,785
$
4,557
Liquidity Management
As of
September 30, 2015
, the Bank had primary sources of liquidity of
$301.1 million
. It is Management's opinion this is sufficient to meet liquidity needs under a broad range of scenarios. The Bank has an additional
$295.4 million
in contingent sources of liquidity, including the Federal Reserve Borrower in Custody program, municipal and corporate securities, and correspondent bank lines of credit. The Asset/Liability Committee ("ALCO") establishes guidelines for liquidity in its Asset/Liability policy and monitors internal liquidity measures to manage liquidity exposure. Based on its assessment of the liquidity considerations described above, Management believes the Company's sources of funding will meet anticipated funding needs.
Liquidity is the ability of a financial institution to meet maturing liability obligations and customer loan demand. The Bank's primary source of liquidity is deposits, which funded
68.8%
of total average assets in the first
nine months
of
2015
. While the generally preferred funding strategy is to attract and retain low-cost deposits, the ability to do so is affected by competitive interest rates and terms in the marketplace. Other sources of funding include discretionary use of purchased liabilities (e.g., FHLB term advances and other borrowings), cash flows from the securities portfolios and loan repayments.
Page 64
Securities designated as available for sale may also be sold in response to short-term or long-term liquidity needs although Management has no intention to do so at this time.
The Bank has a detailed liquidity funding policy and a contingency funding plan that provide for the prompt and comprehensive response to unexpected demands for liquidity. Management has developed quantitative models to estimate needs for contingent funding that could result from unexpected outflows of funds in excess of "business as usual" cash flows. In Management's estimation, risks are concentrated in two major categories: runoff of in-market deposit balances and the inability to renew wholesale sources of funding. Of the two categories, potential runoff of deposit balances would have the most significant impact on contingent liquidity. Our modeling attempts to quantify deposits at risk over selected time horizons. In addition to these unexpected outflow risks, several other "business as usual" factors enter into the calculation of the adequacy of contingent liquidity including payment proceeds from loans and investment securities, maturing debt obligations and maturing time deposits. The Bank has established collateralized borrowing capacity with the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston and also maintains additional collateralized borrowing capacity with the FHLB in excess of levels used in the ordinary course of business as well as Fed Funds lines with three correspondent banks and availability through the Federal Reserve Bank Borrower in Custody program.
Deposits
During the first
nine months
of
2015
, total deposits
increased
by
$33.5 million
or
3.3%
from
December 31, 2014
levels. Low-cost deposits (demand, NOW, and savings accounts)
increased
by
$95.1 million
or
19.9%
in the first
nine months
of
2015
, money market deposits
decreased
$3.4 million
or
3.4%
, and certificates of deposit
decreased
$58.2 million
or
13.0%
. Between
September 30, 2014
and
September 30, 2015
, total deposits
increased
by
$3.0 million
or
0.3%
. Low-cost deposits
increased
by
$81.6 million
or
16.6%
, money market accounts
decreased
$4.0 million
or
4.1%
, and certificates of deposit
decreased
$74.5 million
or
16.1%
. The increase in low-cost deposits both year-to-date and year-over-year is the result of normal seasonal fluctuation as well as organic growth throughout our branch network. The majority of the change in certificates of deposit year-to-date was primarily from a shift in funding between borrowed funds and certificates of deposit.
Borrowed Funds
The Company uses funding from the FHLB of Boston, the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston and repurchase agreements enabling it to grow its balance sheet and its revenues. This funding may also be used to balance seasonal deposit flows or to carry out interest rate risk management strategies, and is increased to replace or supplement other sources of funding, including core deposits and certificates of deposit. During the
nine months
ended
September 30, 2015
, borrowed funds
increased
$17.5 million
or
6.2%
from
December 31, 2014
. Between
September 30, 2014
and
September 30, 2015
, borrowed funds
increased
by
$38.7 million
or
15.0%
. This is due to the above mentioned shift in funding strategy between borrowed funds and certificates of deposit.
Shareholders' Equity
Shareholders' equity as of
September 30, 2015
was
$167.1 million
, compared to
$161.6 million
as of
December 31, 2014
and
$159.2 million
as of
September 30, 2014
. The Company's earnings in the first
nine months
of
2015
, net of dividends paid, added to shareholders' equity. The net unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities, presented in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 740 "Investments – Debt and Equity Securities",
decreased
by
$204,000
from
December 31, 2014
and now stands at a
$2,318,000
.
A cash dividend of
$0.22
per share was declared in the
third quarter
of
2015
. This is equal to what was paid in the second quarter of 2015. The dividend payout ratio, which is calculated by dividing dividends declared per share by diluted earnings per share, was
55.56%
for the first
nine months
of
2015
compared to
58.49%
for the same period in
2014
. In determining future dividend payout levels, the Board of Directors carefully analyzes capital requirements and earnings retention, as set forth in the Company's Dividend Policy. The ability of the Company to pay cash dividends to its shareholders depends on receipt of dividends from its subsidiary, the Bank. The subsidiary may pay dividends to its parent out of so much of its net profits as the Bank's directors deem appropriate, subject to the limitation that the total of all dividends declared by the Bank in any calendar year may not exceed the total of its net profits of that year combined with its retained net profits of the preceding two years. The amount available for dividends in
2015
is this year's net income plus
$12.3 million
.
On January 9, 2009 the Company issued $25 million in Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A, by the U.S. Treasury under the Capital Purchase Program ("the CPP Shares"). The CPP Shares qualified as Tier 1 capital on the Company's books for regulatory purposes and ranked senior to the Company's common stock and senior or at an equal level in the Company's capital structure to any other shares of preferred stock the Company may issue in the future. In three separate transactions in 2012 and 2013, the Company repurchased all of the CPP shares from the Treasury.
Incident to such issuance of the CPP shares, the Company issued to the Treasury warrants (the "Warrants") to purchase up to 225,904 shares of the Company's common stock at a price per share of $16.60 (subject to adjustment). The Warrants (and any shares of common stock issuable pursuant to the Warrants) are freely transferable by Treasury to third parties. The Warrants have a term of ten years and could be exercised by Treasury or a subsequent holder at any time or from time to time during
Page 65
their term. To the extent they had not previously been exercised, the Warrants will expire after ten years. The Warrants were unchanged as a result of the CPP Shares repurchase transactions.
In May 2015, the Treasury sold the entire number of Warrants to private parties. In accordance with the contractual terms of the Warrants, the number of shares and strike price were adjusted at the time of the sale. As a result of this transaction, the number of shares under the Warrants now stands at
226,819
shares with a strike price of
$16.53
.
Financial institution regulators have established guidelines for minimum capital ratios for banks and bank holding companies. The net unrealized gain or loss on available-for-sale securities is generally not included in computing regulatory capital. During the first quarter of 2015, the Company adopted the new Basel III regulatory capital framework as approved by the federal banking agencies. The adoption of this new framework modified the calculation of the various capital ratios, added a new ratio, common equity tier 1, and revised the adequately and well capitalized thresholds. Additionally, under the new rule, in order to avoid limitations on capital distributions, including dividend payments, the Company must hold a capital conservation buffer above the adequately capitalized risk-based capital ratios. The capital conservation buffer is being phased in from 0.0% for 2015 to 2.50% by 2019. The amounts shown below as the adequately capitalized ratio plus capital conservation buffer includes the fully phased-in 2.50% buffer.
The Company met each of the well-capitalized ratio guidelines at
September 30, 2015
. The following tables indicate the capital ratios for the Bank and the Company at
September 30, 2015
and
December 31, 2014
.
As of September 30, 2015
Leverage
Tier 1
Common Equity Tier 1
Total Risk-Based
Bank
8.86
%
14.53
%
14.53
%
15.60
%
Company
9.00
%
15.03
%
15.03
%
16.10
%
Adequately capitalized ratio
4.00
%
6.00
%
4.50
%
8.00
%
Adequately capitalized ratio plus capital conservation buffer
4.00
%
8.50
%
7.00
%
10.50
%
Well capitalized ratio (Bank only)
5.00
%
8.00
%
6.50
%
10.00
%
As of December 31, 2014
Leverage
Tier 1
Common Equity Tier 1
Total Risk-Based
Bank
8.77
%
14.87
%
N/A
%
16.09
%
Company
8.88
%
15.06
%
N/A
%
16.27
%
Adequately capitalized ratio
4.00
%
4.00
%
N/A
%
8.00
%
Well capitalized ratio (Bank only)
5.00
%
6.00
%
N/A
%
10.00
%
Off-Balance Sheet Financial Instruments
No material off-balance sheet risk exists that requires a separate liability presentation.
Contractual Obligations
The following table sets forth the contractual obligations of the Company as of
September 30, 2015
:
Dollars in thousands
Total
Less than 1 year
1-3 years
3-5 years
More than 5 years
Borrowed funds
$
297,369
$
152,233
$
90,000
$
55,000
$
136
Operating leases
522
146
231
90
55
Certificates of deposit
389,307
267,768
46,397
75,142
—
Total
$
687,198
$
420,147
$
136,628
$
130,232
$
191
Total loan commitments and unused lines of credit
$
143,066
$
143,066
$
—
$
—
$
—
Page 66
Item 3 – Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Market-Risk Management
Market risk is the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in the fair value of financial instruments due to changes in interest rates. The First Bancorp, Inc.'s market risk is composed primarily of interest rate risk. The Bank's Asset/Liability Committee (ALCO) is responsible for reviewing the interest rate sensitivity position of the Company and establishing policies to monitor and limit exposure to interest rate risk. All guidelines and policies established by ALCO have been approved by the Board of Directors.
Asset/Liability Management
The primary goal of asset/liability management is to maximize net interest income within the interest rate risk limits set by ALCO. Interest rate risk is monitored through the use of two complementary measures: static gap analysis and earnings simulation modeling. While each measurement has limitations, taken together they represent a reasonably comprehensive view of the magnitude of interest rate risk in the Company, the level of risk through time, and the amount of exposure to changes in certain interest rate relationships.
Static gap analysis measures the amount of repricing risk embedded in the balance sheet at a point in time. It does so by comparing the differences in the repricing characteristics of assets and liabilities. A gap is defined as the difference between the principal amount of assets and liabilities that reprice within a specified time period. The Company's cumulative one-year gap at
September 30, 2015
was +
8.23%
of total assets compared to +
0.05%
of total assets at
December 31, 2014
. Core deposits with non-contractual maturities are presented based upon historical patterns of balance attrition and pricing behavior, which are reviewed at least annually.
The gap repricing distributions include principal cash flows from residential mortgage loans and mortgage-backed securities in the time frames in which they are expected to be received. Mortgage prepayments are estimated by applying industry median projections of prepayment speeds to portfolio segments based on coupon range and loan age.
A summary of the Company's static gap, as of
September 30, 2015
, is presented in the following table:
0-90
90-365
1-5
5+
Dollars in thousands
Days
Days
Years
Years
Investment securities at amortized cost
$
25,107
$
59,067
$
172,341
$
201,173
Restricted stock, at cost
12,875
—
—
1,037
Loans held for sale
—
—
—
200
Loans
386,687
154,668
316,900
104,896
Other interest-earning assets
—
21,360
—
—
Non-rate-sensitive assets
11,122
—
—
72,239
Total assets
435,791
235,095
489,241
379,545
Interest-bearing deposits
289,682
94,620
120,493
425,015
Borrowed funds
152,233
—
145,000
136
Non-rate-sensitive liabilities and equity
1,900
5,700
32,350
272,543
Total liabilities and equity
443,815
100,320
297,843
697,694
Period gap
$
(8,024
)
$
134,775
$
191,398
$
(318,149
)
Percent of total assets
(0.52
)
%
8.75
%
12.43
%
(20.66
)
%
Cumulative gap (current)
$
(8,024
)
$
126,751
$
318,149
$
—
Percent of total assets
(0.52
)
%
8.23
%
20.66
%
—
%
The earnings simulation model forecasts capture the impact of changing interest rates on one-year and two-year net interest income. The modeling process calculates changes in interest income received and interest expense paid on all interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities reflected on the Company's balance sheet. None of the assets used in the simulation are held for trading purposes. The modeling is done for a variety of scenarios that incorporate changes in the absolute level of interest rates as well as basis risk, as represented by changes in the shape of the yield curve and changes in interest rate relationships. Management evaluates the effects on income of alternative interest rate scenarios against earnings in a stable interest rate environment. This analysis is also most useful in determining the short-run earnings exposures to changes in customer behavior involving loan payments and deposit additions and withdrawals.
Page 67
The Company's most recent simulation model projects net interest income would decrease by approximately
0.99%
of stable-rate net interest income if short-term rates affected by Federal Open Market Committee actions fall gradually by one percentage point over the next year, and decrease by approximately
2.93%
if rates rise gradually by two percentage points. Both scenarios are well within ALCO's policy limit of a decrease in net interest income of no more than 10.0% given a 2.0% move in interest rates, up or down. Management believes this reflects a reasonable interest rate risk position. In year two, and assuming no additional movement in rates, the model forecasts that net interest income would be lower than that earned in a stable rate environment by
2.84%
in a falling-rate scenario, and lower than that earned in a stable rate environment by
1.27%
in a rising rate scenario, when compared to the year-one base scenario. A summary of the Bank's interest rate risk simulation modeling, as of
September 30, 2015
and
December 31, 2014
is presented in the following table:
Changes in Net Interest Income
September 30, 2015
December 31, 2014
Year 1
Projected change if rates decrease by 1.0%
-0.99
%
-1.47%
Projected change if rates increase by 2.0%
-2.93
%
-2.95%
Year 2
Projected change if rates decrease by 1.0%
-2.84
%
-3.00%
Projected change if rates increase by 2.0%
-1.27
%
-3.42%
This dynamic simulation model includes assumptions about how the balance sheet is likely to evolve through time and in different interest rate environments. Loans and deposits are projected to maintain stable balances. All maturities, calls and prepayments in the securities portfolio are assumed to be reinvested in similar assets. Mortgage loan prepayment assumptions are developed from industry median estimates of prepayment speeds for portfolios with similar coupon ranges and seasoning. Non-contractual deposit volatility and pricing are assumed to follow historical patterns. The sensitivities of key assumptions are analyzed annually and reviewed by ALCO.
This sensitivity analysis does not represent a Company forecast and should not be relied upon as being indicative of expected operating results. These hypothetical estimates are based upon numerous assumptions including, among others, the nature and timing of interest rate levels, yield curve shape, prepayments on loans and securities, pricing decisions on loans and deposits, and reinvestment/ replacement of asset and liability cash flows. While assumptions are developed based upon current economic and local market conditions, the Company cannot make any assurances as to the predictive ability of these assumptions, including how customer preferences or competitor influences might change.
Interest Rate Risk Management
A variety of financial instruments can be used to manage interest rate sensitivity. These may include investment securities, interest rate swaps, and interest rate caps and floors. Frequently called interest rate derivatives, interest rate swaps, caps and floors have characteristics similar to securities but possess the advantages of customization of the risk-reward profile of the instrument, minimization of balance sheet leverage and improvement of liquidity. As of
September 30, 2015
, the Company was using no interest rate derivatives for interest rate risk management.
The Company engages an independent consultant to periodically review its interest rate risk position, as well as the effectiveness of simulation modeling and reasonableness of assumptions used. As of
September 30, 2015
, there were no significant differences between the views of the independent consultant and Management regarding the Company's interest rate risk exposure. As a result of recent statements made by the Federal Open Market Committee, Management expects that short-term interest rates may increase sometime in the next one-to-three quarters and believes that the current level of interest rate risk is acceptable.
Page 68
Item 4: Controls and Procedures
As required by Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as of
September 30, 2015
, the end of the quarter covered by this report, the Company carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of the Company's management, including the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures. In designing and evaluating the Company's disclosure controls and procedures, the Company and its management recognize that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and the Company's management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating and implementing possible controls and procedures. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms. There was no change in the Company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended
September 30, 2015
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting. The Company reviews its disclosure controls and procedures, which may include its internal controls over financial reporting on an ongoing basis, and may from time to time make changes aimed at enhancing their effectiveness and to ensure that the Company's systems evolve with its business.
Page 69
Part II – Other Information
Item 1 – Legal Proceedings
The Company was not involved in any legal proceedings requiring disclosure under Item 103 of Regulation S-K during the reporting period.
Item 1A – Risk Factors
There have been no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2014
.
Item 2 – Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
a. None
b. None
c. None
Item 3 – Default Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4 – Other Information
A. None.
B. None.
Page 70
Item 5 – Exhibits
Exhibit 2.1 Agreement and Plan of Merger With FNB Bankshares Dated August 25, 2004, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company's Form 8-K dated August 25, 2004, filed under item 1.01 on August 27, 2004.
Exhibit 3.1 Conformed Copy of the Registrant's Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Form 8-K filed under item 5.03 on October 7, 2004).
Exhibit 3.2 Amendment to the Registrant's Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Form 8-K filed under item 5.03 on May 1, 2008).
Exhibit 3.3 Amendment to the Registrant's Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to the Definitive Proxy Statement for the Company's 2008 Annual Meeting filed on March 14, 2008).
Exhibit 3.4 Amendment to the Registrant's Articles of Incorporation authorizing issuance of preferred stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 29, 2008).
Exhibit 3.5 Conformed Copy of the Company's Bylaws (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Form 8-K filed under item 5.03 on October 31, 2012).
Exhibit 10.1(a) Specimen Split Dollar Agreement entered into with Mr. McKim with a death benefit of $250,000. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3(a) to the Company's Form 8-K filed under item 1.01 on January 14, 2005.
Exhibit 10.1(b) Specimen Amendment to Split Dollar Agreement entered into with Mr. McKim, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3(b) to the Company's Form 8-K filed under item 1.01 on January 14, 2005.
Exhibit 10.2 Specimen Amendment to Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan entered into with Messrs. Daigneault and Ward changing the normal retirement age to receive the full benefit under the Plan from age 65 to age 63, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Form 8-K filed under item 1.01 on December 30, 2008.
Exhibit 10.3 Purchase and Assumption Agreement between the Bank and Camden National Bank for the purchase of a bank branch, loans and deposits at 63 Union Street in Rockland, Maine, attached as Exhibit 10.5 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 9, 2012.
Exhibit 10.4 Purchase and Sale Agreement between the Bank and Camden National Bank for the purchase of a bank building at 145 Exchange Street in Bangor, Maine, attached as Exhibit 10.6 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 9, 2012.
Exhibit 10.5 Underwriting agreement for a public common stock offering between the Company and Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc., a Stifel Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1 to the Company's Form 8-K filed under item 1.01 on March 26, 2013.
Exhibit 10.6 Letter Agreement between the Company and the United States Treasury, dated March 27, 2013, to repurchase $2.5 million of the Company's Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Form 8-K filed under item 1.01 on March 28, 2013.
Exhibit 10.7 Letter Agreement between the Company and the United States Treasury, dated May 8, 2013, to repurchase $10.0 million of the Company's Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Form 8-K filed under item 1.01 on March 28, 2013.
Exhibit 10.8 Specimen Deferred Compensation Agreement entered into with Mr. Daigneault, referenced in the Company's Form 8-K filed under item 5.02 on September 30, 2014.
Exhibit 14.1 Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers, adopted by the Board of Directors on September 19, 2003. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 14.1 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 15, 2006.
Exhibit 14.2 Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, adopted by the Board of Directors on April 15, 2004. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 14.2 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 15, 2006.
Exhibit 31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13A-14(A) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Exhibit 31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13A-14(A) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Exhibit 32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Exhibit 32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Exhibit 101.INS XBRL Instance Document
Exhibit 101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
Exhibit 101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
Exhibit 101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
Page 71
Exhibit 101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
Exhibit 101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definitions Linkbase
Page 72
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
THE FIRST BANCORP, INC.
/s/ Tony C. McKim
Tony C. McKim
President & Chief Executive Officer
Date:
November 6, 2015
/s/ F. Stephen Ward
F. Stephen Ward
Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
Date:
November 6, 2015
Page 73