UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For quarter ended June 30, 2003 Commission file number 1-6028 LINCOLN NATIONAL CORPORATION (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Indiana 35-1140070 (State of incorporation) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) 1500 Market Street, Suite 3900, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19102-2112 (Address of principal executive offices) Registrant's telephone number (215) 448-1400 Indicate the number of shares outstanding for each issurer's classes of common stock, as of the last applicable date: As of August 1, 2003 LNC had 177,728,818 shares of Common Stock outstanding. Indicate by check mark whether registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter periods that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [ X ] No [ ] Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [ X ] No The exhibit index to this report is located on page 66. PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION Item 1 Financial Statements LINCOLN NATIONAL CORPORATION CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS <TABLE> <CAPTION> June 30 December 31 (000s omitted) 2003 2002* -------------- ---- ---- ASSETS (Unaudited) <S> <C> <C> Investments: Securities available-for-sale, at fair value: Fixed maturity (cost 2003 - $32,256,822; 2002 - $31,103,146) $35,354,502 $32,767,465 Equity (cost 2003 - $244,287; 2002 - $334,493) 257,308 337,216 Mortgage loans on real estate 4,314,281 4,205,470 Real estate 240,328 279,702 Policy loans 1,919,586 1,945,626 Derivative instruments 104,976 86,236 Other investments 400,601 378,136 ----------- ----------- Total Investments 42,591,582 39,999,851 Cash and invested cash 1,945,847 1,690,534 Property and equipment 239,080 242,135 Deferred acquisition costs 2,697,078 2,970,866 Premiums and fees receivable 395,994 212,942 Accrued investment income 555,141 536,720 Assets held in separate accounts 39,942,847 36,178,336 Federal income taxes -- 317,726 Amounts recoverable from reinsurers 7,377,104 7,280,014 Goodwill 1,233,614 1,233,232 Other intangible assets 1,258,611 1,291,973 Other assets 1,295,902 1,230,316 ----------- ----------- Total Assets $99,532,800 $93,184,645 * Restated, see Note 2 - Change in Accounting Principle for more information. See notes to consolidated financial statements. </TABLE> <TABLE> <CAPTION> LINCOLN NATIONAL CORPORATION CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS - -CONTINUED- June 30 December 31 (000s omitted) 2003 2002* -------------- ---- ---- (Unaudited) LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY <S> <C> <C> Liabilities: Insurance and Investment Contract Liabilities: Insurance policy and claim reserves $23,918,880 $23,558,874 Contractholder funds 22,253,232 21,286,396 Liabilities related to separate accounts 39,942,847 36,178,336 ----------- ----------- Total Insurance and Investment Contract Liabilities 86,114,959 81,023,606 Federal Income Taxes 71,953 -- Short-term debt 83,399 153,045 Long-term debt 1,121,439 1,119,245 Company-obligated mandatorily redeemable preferred securities of subsidiary trusts holding solely junior subordinated debentures 397,150 392,658 Other liabilities 4,989,023 4,171,452 Deferred gain on indemnity reinsurance 938,938 977,149 ----------- ----------- Total Liabilities 93,716,861 87,837,155 Shareholders' Equity: Series A preferred stock-10,000,000 shares authorized (6/30/03 liquidation value - $1,528) 638 666 Common stock - 800,000,000 shares authorized 1,454,828 1,431,342 Retained earnings 3,244,339 3,180,928 Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss): Foreign currency translation adjustment 68,324 50,780 Net unrealized gain on securities available-for-sale 1,117,804 753,272 Net unrealized gain on derivative instruments 28,799 28,349 Minimum pension liability adjustment (98,793) (97,847) ----------- ----------- Total Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income 1,116,134 734,554 ----------- ----------- Total Shareholders' Equity 5,815,939 5,347,490 ----------- ----------- Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity $99,532,800 $93,184,645 * Restated, see Note 2 - Change in Accounting Principle for more information. See notes to consolidated financial statements. </TABLE> <TABLE> <CAPTION> LINCOLN NATIONAL CORPORATION CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME Six Months Ended Three Months Ended June 30 June 30 (000s omitted, except per share amounts) 2003 2002* 2003 2002* - ---------------------------------------- ---- ---- ---- ---- (Unaudited) (Unaudited) <S> <C> <C> Revenue: Insurance premiums $134,285 $154,119 $65,988 $76,999 Insurance fees 682,650 714,245 347,768 359,845 Investment advisory fees 93,537 95,766 49,353 47,756 Net investment income 1,314,867 1,312,205 660,219 657,407 Realized loss on investments and derivative instruments (net of amounts restored/(amortized) against balance sheet accounts, Note 4) (94,127) (184,403) (2,690) (81,060) Amortization of deferred gain on indemnity reinsurance 36,211 46,200 18,045 22,038 Other revenue and fees 145,056 145,298 74,470 74,494 ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- Total Revenue 2,312,479 2,283,430 1,213,153 1,157,479 Benefits and Expenses: Benefits 1,206,219 1,251,722 593,189 648,326 Underwriting, acquisition, insurance and other expenses 836,832 839,804 409,319 437,571 Interest and debt expense 46,301 49,455 22,966 24,649 ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- Total Benefits and Expenses 2,089,352 2,140,981 1,025,474 1,110,546 ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- Income before Federal Income Taxes 223,127 142,449 187,679 46,933 Federal income taxes 38,836 8,296 44,977 (1,615) ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- Net Income $184,291 $134,153 $142,702 $48,548 Net Income Per Common Share- Basic $1.04 $0.72 $0.81 $0.26 Net Income Per Common Share- Diluted $1.03 $0.71 $0.80 $0.26 *Restated, see Note 2- Change in Accounting Principle for more information. See notes to consolidated financial statements </TABLE> <TABLE> <CAPTION> LINCOLN NATIONAL CORPORATION CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY Six Months Ended June 30 Number of Shares Amounts (000s omitted from dollar amounts) 2003 2002 2003 2002* ------------------------------------------ ---- ---- ---- ---- (Unaudited) (Unaudited) <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> Series A Preferred Stock: Balance at beginning-of-year 20,118 23,034 $666 $762 Conversion into common stock (1,018) (2,464) (28) (81) ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- Balance at June 30 19,100 20,570 638 681 Common Stock: Balance at beginning-of-year 177,307,999 186,943,738 1,431,342 1,340,002 Conversion of series A preferred stock 16,288 39,424 28 81 Issued/forfeited under benefit plans 337,999 2,075,366 8,100 71,805 Additional paid-in capital - vesting of stock options granted 23,546 27,546 Additional paid-in capital - tax benefit on stock options (8,188) 2,486 Retirement of common stock -- (4,885,000) -- (27,079) ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- Balance at June 30 177,662,286 184,173,528 1,454,828 1,414,841 Retained Earnings: Balance at beginning-of-year 3,180,928 3,789,870 Comprehensive income 565,871 293,431 Less other comprehensive income (loss): Foreign currency translation adjustment 17,544 30,009 Net unrealized gain on securities available-for-sale 364,532 129,994 Net unrealized gain on derivative instruments 450 1,154 Minimum pension liability adjustment (946) (1,879) ----------- ----------- Net Income 184,291 134,153 Retirement of common stock -- (199,596) Dividends declared: Series A preferred ($1.50 per share) (30) (30) Common stock (2003-$0.67; 2002-$0.64) (120,850) (119,584) ----------- ----------- Balance at June 30 $3,244,339 $3,604,813 *Restated, see Note 2- Change in Accounting Principle for more information. See notes to consolidated financial statements. <CAPTION> LINCOLN NATIONAL CORPORATION CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (Continued) Six Months Ended June 30 Amounts (000s omitted from dollar amounts) 2003 2002* ---------------------------------------- ---- ---- (Unaudited) <S> <C> <C> Foreign Currency Translation Adjustment: Accumulated adjustment at beginning-of-year $50,780 $(8,062) Change during the period 17,544 30,009 ----------- ----------- Balance at June 30 68,324 21,947 ----------- ----------- Net Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Securities Available-for-Sale: Balance at beginning-of-year 753,272 195,681 Change during the period 364,532 129,994 ----------- ----------- Balance at June 30 1,117,804 325,675 ----------- ----------- Net Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Derivative Instruments: Balance at beginning-of-year 28,349 21,523 Change during the period 450 1,154 ----------- ----------- Balance at June 30 28,799 22,677 ----------- ----------- Minimum Pension Liability Adjustment: Balance at beginning-of-year (97,847) (35,959) Change during the period (946) (1,879) ----------- ----------- Balance at June 30 (98,793) (37,838) ----------- ----------- Total Shareholders' Equity at June 30 $5,815,939 $5,352,796 Common Stock at End of Quarter: Assuming conversion of preferred stock 177,967,886 184,502,648 Diluted basis 179,535,988 186,141,360 * Restated, see Note 2 - Change in Accounting Principle for more information. See notes to consolidated financial statements. </TABLE> <TABLE> <CAPTION> LINCOLN NATIONAL CORPORATION CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS Six Months Ended June 30 (000s omitted) 2003 2002* ---------------------------------------- ---- ---- <S> <C> <C> Cash Flows from Operating Activities: (Unaudited) Net income $184,291 $134,153 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities: Deferred acquisition costs (124,923) (145,091) Premiums and fees receivable (183,052) (61,322) Accrued investment income (18,421) 7,157 Policy liabilities and accruals (115,211) (38,478) Contractholder funds 627,485 485,650 Amounts recoverable from reinsurers (97,090) (479,566) Federal income taxes 151,437 67,583 Federal income taxes paid from proceeds of disposition -- (516,152) Stock-based compensation expense 23,546 27,546 Provisions for depreciation 26,268 24,946 Amortization of other intangible assets 40,266 57,484 Amortization of deferred gain (36,211) (46,200) Realized loss on investments and derivative instruments 94,127 184,403 Other (172,846) 258,310 ----------- ----------- Net Adjustments 215,375 (173,730) ----------- ----------- Net Cash Provided (Used in) by Operating Activities 399,666 (39,577) Cash Flows from Investing Activities: Securities-available-for-sale: Purchases (6,034,829) (6,851,274) Sales 3,326,550 4,316,833 Maturities 1,547,234 1,253,870 Purchase of other investments (657,178) (471,458) Sale or maturity of other investments 569,646 783,146 Increase (Decrease) in cash collateral on loaned securities 256,631 (105,800) Property and equipment purchases (66,992) (72,133) Property and equipment sales 49,823 57,452 Other 246,606 118,661 ----------- ----------- Net Cash Used in Investing Activities (762,509) (970,703) Cash Flows from Financing Activities: Retirement/call of preferred securities of subsidiary trusts -- (94,632) Issuance of long-term debt -- 248,990 Net decrease in short-term debt (69,645) (139,184) Universal life and investment contract deposits 2,334,640 2,541,811 Universal life and investment contract withdrawals (1,329,594) (1,711,976) Investment contract transfers (204,754) (264,000) Common stock issued for benefit plans 8,100 71,804 Retirement of common stock -- (223,116) Other liabilities - retirement of common stock -- (128,330) Dividends paid to shareholders (120,591) (121,123) ----------- ----------- Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities 618,156 180,244 ----------- ----------- Net Increase (decrease) in Cash and Invested Cash 255,313 (830,036) Cash and Invested Cash at Beginning-of-Year 1,690,534 3,095,480 ----------- ----------- Cash and Invested Cash at June 30 $1,945,847 $2,265,444 * Restated, see Note 2 - Change in Accounting Principle for more information. See notes to consolidated financial statements. </TABLE> LINCOLN NATIONAL CORPORATION NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) 1. Basis of Presentation The accompanying consolidated financial statements include Lincoln National Corporation ("LNC") and its majority-owned subsidiaries. Through subsidiary companies, LNC operates multiple insurance and investment management businesses. The collective group of companies uses "Lincoln Financial Group" as its marketing identity. Operations are divided into four business segments. Less than majority-owned entities in which LNC has at least a 20% interest are reported on the equity basis. These unaudited consolidated statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, except that they do not contain complete notes. However, in the opinion of management, these statements include all normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the results. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes incorporated by reference into LNC's latest annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002. Operating results for the six months ended June 30, 2003 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year ending December 31, 2003. 2. Change in Accounting Principle and New Accounting Pronouncements Accounting for Stock Compensation. Effective January 1, 2003, LNC adopted the fair value recognition method of accounting for its stock option incentive plans under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation" ("FAS 123"). On December 31, 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation -Transition and Disclosure" ("FAS 148"), which provides alternative methods of transition for entities that change to the fair value method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. In addition, FAS 148 amends the disclosure provisions of FAS 123 to require expanded and more prominent disclosure of the effects of an entity's accounting policy with respect to stock-based employee compensation on reported net income and earnings per share in annual and interim financial statements. LNC adopted the retroactive restatement method under FAS 148 which requires LNC to restate all prior periods presented to reflect stock-based employee compensation cost under the fair value accounting method in FAS 123 for all employee awards granted, modified or settled in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 1994. See LNC's Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 on file with the SEC. The earliest year for which the consolidated income statement will be presented in LNC's 2003 annual report on Form 10-K is 2001 and LNC elects not to restate earlier periods. Prior to January 1, 2003, LNC accounted for its stock option incentive plans using the intrinsic value method of accounting under the recognition and measurement provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees" ("APB 25"), and related Interpretations. No stock-based compensation cost for stock options was reflected in previously reported results. The effect of the accounting change on net income for 2002 is as follows: <TABLE> <CAPTION> Six Months Ended Three Months Ended June 30, June 30, (in millions except per share amounts) 2002 2002 ---- ---- <S> <C> <C> Net income as previously reported $153.9 $59.4 Adjustment for effect of change in accounting principle that is applied retroactively, net of tax effects (19.8) (10.9) -------- ------ Net income as adjusted $134.1 $48.5 Per share amounts: Earnings per common share - Basic: Net income as previously reported $0.83 $0.32 Adjustment for effect of change in accounting principle that is applied retroactively, net of tax effects (0.11) (0.06) -------- ------ Net income as adjusted $0.72 $0.26 Earnings per common share - Diluted: Net income as previously reported $0.81 $0.31 Adjustment for effect of change in accounting principle that is applied retroactively, net of tax effects (0.10) (0.05) -------- ------ Net income as adjusted $0.71 $0.26 Retained earnings at June 30, 2002: Retained earnings as previously reported $3,669.1 Cumulative adjustment for effect of change in accounting principle that is applied retroactively, net of tax effects (64.3) -------- Retained earnings as adjusted $3,604.8 </TABLE> Although LNC did not recognize compensation expense for stock options under the intrinsic value method of accounting in accordance with APB 25, a tax benefit was recognized in additional paid-in capital for stock options that were exercised through December 31, 2002. Because LNC elected not to restate periods prior to 2001 in the adoption of FAS 123, the tax benefit for options granted after December 31, 1994 and exercised prior to January 1, 2001 had to be determined under the fair value method and then compared to the tax benefit that was previously recorded in additional paid-in capital upon exercise. As of January 1, 2001, a tax benefit was calculated under the fair value method for outstanding stock options granted after December 31, 1994 that vested prior to January 1, 2001. An adjustment of $26.5 million was made to increase additional paid-in capital and the deferred tax asset as of January 1, 2001 for the adoption of FAS 123. Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities. In June 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 146, "Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities" ("FAS 146"), which addresses financial accounting and reporting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities and nullifies Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 94-3, "Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Action (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring)" ("Issue 94-3"). The principal difference between FAS 146 and Issue 94-3 is that FAS 146 requires that a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized when the liability is incurred, rather than at the date of an entity's commitment to an exit plan. FAS 146 is effective for exit or disposal activities after December 31, 2002. LNC adopted FAS 146 on January 1, 2003 and the adoption of the Statement will affect the timing of when an expense is recognized for restructuring activities. Accounting for Variable Interest Entities. In January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Interpretation No. 46, "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities" ("Interpretation 46"), which requires the consolidation of variable interest entities ("VIE") by an enterprise if that enterprise has a variable interest that will absorb a majority of the VIE's expected losses if they occur, receive a majority of the entity's expected residual returns if they occur, or both. If one enterprise will absorb a majority of a VIE's expected losses and another enterprise will receive a majority of that VIE's expected residual returns, the enterprise absorbing a majority of the losses shall consolidate the VIE. VIE refers to an entity in which equity investors do not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties. This Interpretation applies in the third quarter of 2003 to VIEs in which an enterprise holds a variable interest that is acquired before February 1, 2003. LNC intends to adopt this Interpretation prospectively with a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the beginning of the third quarter of 2003. As key guidance with respect to certain aspects of the new Interpretation is still emerging, LNC has not been able to finalize the expected effect of adoption. Among the matters that LNC is currently reviewing in connection with the third quarter 2003 effective date of Interpretation No. 46 to existing VIEs is the potential application to Collateralized Debt Obligation (CDO) pools that are managed by LNC. Because the fees earned by LNC for managing these CDOs are required to be included in the analysis of expected residual returns, it is likely that such CDO pools may fall under the consolidation requirements of Interpretation No. 46. If the invested assets within the CDO pools and the liabilities owed by the CDO pools to the third party investors are required to be brought onto LNC's consolidated balance sheet, LNC would disclose that the CDO pool liabilities are nonrecourse to LNC. Because the fair value of the underlying invested assets in the CDO pools is currently below amortized cost basis, if LNC is required to consolidate the CDO pools, the value of the assets recorded upon initial adoption of the new Interpretation will be less than the amount of nonrecourse debt. Based upon information currently available, LNC estimates that the fair value of the CDO pool assets is about $1.2 billion and that the nonrecourse debt would be recorded at about $1.5 billion. LNC has an investment of about $22.5 million in certain of the CDO pools that it manages; at June 30, 2003 these investments had a fair value of $21.5 million. So LNC does not bear the economic risk of the loss represented by the approximate $300 million difference between the value of all of the CDO pool assets and the total amount of CDO pool nonrecourse debt. Yet under this emerging guidance, at the time of adopting these new rules LNC's financial statements would not reflect the fact that it is the third party investor group, and not LNC, that bears the economic risk of these losses. To record the difference between the value of the CDO pool assets and the CDO pool nonrecourse debt on LNC's balance sheet upon the adoption of Interpretation 46, LNC would record a charge to equity through Other Comprehensive Income for the cumulative temporary declines in underlying investment asset values and LNC would record a charge to net income equal to the cumulative declines in value of the underlying investment assets that are considered other than temporary. While LNC has not been able to complete the analysis of all of the underlying investment assets held within these CDO pools in order to determine which of these investments have experienced declines in fair value that are other than temporary, based upon the analysis completed to date it appears likely that 50% or more of the cumulative declines in the fair value of the CDO pool assets may be determined to be other than temporary. In subsequent periods, when the underlying invested assets are sold and the proceeds are distributed to the investors, LNC would record gains associated with the extinguishment of nonrecourse debt. This reversal of the losses recorded upon the initial adoption of Interpretation 46 as the CDO pools liquidate reflects the fact that it is the third party investors, and not LNC, that ultimatley bears the risk of loss from these CDO pools. The Financial Accounting Standards Board is still considering important guidance relating to these types of investment pools. Until final guidance is issued, LNC is unable to finalize its review of these matters. In addition, LNC does not currently have access to all information necessary to determine the ultimate effects of such a required consolidation, because LNC is not the trustee or the administrator of the CDO pools. Accordingly, the estimated effects of the adoption of Interpretation 46 that are discussed in the preceding paragraphs are subject to change, pending the issuance of final guidance by the FASB and LNC's obtaining the necessary information from the CDO pool trustees and administrators. Since LNC's role of investment manager for the CDO pools does not expose LNC to risk of loss on the underlying invested assets, LNC management does not believe the accounting model imposed under Interpretation 46 is reflective of the true underlying economics for the investment manager of these types of CDO pool arrangements. However, based upon the current status of this emerging guidance, it appears that LNC may be required to apply this accounting model in order to comply with generally accepted accounting principles. Although LNC and the industry continue to review the new rules, at the present time LNC does not believe there are other significant VIEs that would result in consolidation with LNC, beyond the managed CDO pools discussed above. Accounting for Modified Coinsurance. In April 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board's ("FASB") Derivative Implementation Group issued Statement 133 Implementation Issue No. B36 ("DIG B36") addressing the accounting for modified coinsurance agreements ("Modco") and coinsurance with funds withheld ("CFW") reinsurance agreements. This implementation guidance concluded that Modco and CFW agreements contain embedded derivatives that must be accounted for separately from the underlying reinsurance agreements. In conjunction with the initial application of these new rules, companies that have ceded business and are holding invested assets under these types of reinsurance arrangements may reclassify available for sale invested assets to trading account classification, where such securities relate to the embedded derivatives in the reinsurance agreements. The effective date for implementation of DIG B36 for LNC will be the October 1, 2003 start date of the fourth quarter. Upon adoption, LNC will record the fair value of the applicable embedded derivatives in net income as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle. The new rules do not provide guidance with respect to a number of key implementation matters, presenting LNC and the life insurance industry with several challenging decisions and numerous alterative interpretations as to the application of the new rules. Accordingly, LNC is currently evaluating alternative interpretations, as well as potential changes in its reinsurance agreements, that could affect the amounts recorded at the time of adoption as well as the way changes in the fair values of invested assets and embedded derivatives associated with these reinsurance agreements will be reflected within LNC's financial statements on an ongoing basis. Among the matters LNC is currently evaluating is how to characterize the embedded derivatives in various Modco and CFW reinsurance agreements. Alternatives under consideration include viewing the embedded derivatives as total return swaps or credit default swaps. Once the characterizations of the various embedded derivatives are decided upon, LNC must then determine what methodologies to use to measure the fair value of the embedded derivatives. For instance, if LNC determines that characterization of an embedded derivative as a total return swap is appropriate for a particular agreement, LNC might look to the unrealized gains and losses included within the invested assets supporting the agreement as a means of measuring the fair value of the embedded derivative. In such circumstances, upon adoption of the new rules LNC may decide to reclassify that portion of the underlying invested assets that are currently classified as available for sale securities to trading account assets. To illustrate the potential effect that the initial adoption of these rules could have on LNC's financial statements, information relating to invested assets held by LNC at June 30, 2003 under Modco and CFW agreements is provided below. The actual effect of adoption will vary depending upon a number of factors, such as how the embedded derivatives are characterized, the valuation methodologies selected, whether the terms of the reinsurance agreements provide for a pass through of the total return of an identified investment portfolio or some other measure, whether or not invested assets within such reinsurance investment portfolios are reclassified from available for sale to trading account, the amount of unrealized gains or losses of the relevant invested assets at the adoption date, and any changes in the terms or structure of a large number of existing LNC Modco and CFW reinsurance agreements. At June 30, 2003, the fair value of LNC invested assets associated with Modco and CFW agreements totaled about $3.3 billion. The net unrealized pre-tax gain associated with these assets at June 30, 2003 was about $481 million. Included within that total net gain is about $450 million of net gain related to available for sale securities and $31 million of net gain related to other invested assets. If LNC should determine that the best characterization of the embedded derivatives associated with these various agreements is that of total return swaps, and if LNC determines that the unrealized gains and losses of the underlying invested asset portfolios can be used to measure the value of the embedded derivative, and provided further that there were no changes in the value of the underlying investment portfolios and that there are no changes in the reinsurance agreements between June 30, 2003 and October 1, 2003, then LNC would record a $481 million pre-tax loss in net income upon the initial adoption of the new rules to record the various embedded derivatives. LNC would also record a pre-tax increase in equity of $450 million to reverse the "shadow adjustment" entries previously recorded through Other Comprehensive Income. The shadow adjustments were previously recorded due to the fact that unrealized gains or losses on the reinsurance portfolios generally inure to the benefit or detriment of the assuming reinsurance company. The $31 million pretax net effect on LNC's equity of the initial adoption adjustments would reverse over the term of the reinsurance agreements, as the net unrealized gains associated with invested assets that are not classified as available-for-sale securities are realized in future periods. If LNC decided to concurrently reclassify all relevant available-for-sale invested assets to trading account assets upon the initial adoption of these new rules, LNC would record a pre-tax gain in net income of $450 million. However, LNC's equity would not be affected by this reclassification accounting, as the previously recorded increases to shareholder's equity booked in Other Comprehensive Income as a result of the available-for-sale classification of these investments would be reversed upon the reclassification of these invested assets from available-for-sale to trading account. On an ongoing basis, changes in the fair value of the embedded derivative would flow through net income, as would changes in the fair value of trading account assets. Changes in the fair value of other invested assets supporting these agreements would flow through net income as unrealized gains or losses on these assets are realized. Because the recognition of the fair value of embedded derivatives does not affect either the cash flows or the economic profits to be recognized over the life of the reinsurance agreement, it is expected that these new rules will only change the pattern of earnings associated with these reinsurance agreements. Importantly, it is expected that the new rules will not change the ultimate profit or loss that will be reported over the entire term of the reinsurance agreement. Not included in the above discussion are a number of reinsurance agreements where LNC accepts business as a reinsurer on a Modco basis and then cedes the business off on a Modco basis to Swiss Re. LNC does not hold the underlying invested assets under these agreements, and LNC has effectively transferred all underwriting and investment risks associated with these agreements. LNC is a party to a number of such reinsurance agreements, which at June 30, 2003 aggregated about $1.8 billion of business. While LNC continues to review the treatment of these Modco agreements under these new rules, it appears that the embedded derivatives associated with these agreements will be characterized as total return swaps. Based upon information available at this time and the preliminary conclusion that these embedded derivatives should be characterized as total return swaps, LNC expects that its position as an accepting reinsurer and a ceding company on the same business should result in equal and offsetting changes in the value of the embedded derivatives associated with these agreements. Accordingly, LNC would not expect that the embedded derivatives associated with these reinsurance agreements would create significant volatility in reported net income in future periods. In addition, LNC has acquired certain blocks of variable annuity and life business using Modco reinsurance structures. At June 30, 2003 there was about $336 million of business acquired in this manner. LNC continues to review whether the accounting for these agreements will change under the new rules; based upon information available at this time LNC does not believe there will be any new effects on net income created by the adoption of the new embedded derivative accounting rules for these agreements, given the fact that the assets and liabilities associated with these variable blocks of business are already reflected at fair value within LNC's financial statements. Statement of Position 03-1. In July 2003, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants issued Statement of Position 03-1, "Accounting and Reporting by Insurance Enterprises for Certain Nontraditional Long-Duration Contracts and for Separate Accounts" ("SOP 03-1"). SOP 03-1 provides guidance related to the reporting and disclosure of certain insurance contracts and separate accounts, including guidance for computing reserves for products with guaranteed benefits, such as guaranteed minimum death benefits ("GMDB"), and for products with annuitization benefits such as guaranteed minimum income benefits. In addition, SOP 03-1 addresses the presentation and reporting of separate accounts, as well as rules concerning the capitalization and amortization of sales inducements. Based upon a preliminary comparison of the requirements of SOP 03-1 to LNC's established practice of reserving for GMDB, the adoption of the GMDB reserving methodology under SOP 03-1 is not expected to have material effect on LNC's financial statements. In addition to GMDB reserving matters, LNC is also assessing the other requirements included in SOP 03-1. At this point, LNC has not had sufficient time to complete an estimate of the expected effect of these other SOP 03-01 requirements; however, based upon a preliminary review, LNC does not currently expect that the adoption of these new rules should have a material effect on LNC's financial statements. LNC expects to adopt SOP 03-1 in the first quarter of 2004. 3. Federal Income Taxes. The effective tax rate on net income is lower than the prevailing corporate federal income tax rate principally from tax-preferred investment income. LNC recorded a tax benefit on the income before federal income taxes for the three months ended June 30, 2002 due to the fact that LNC earns tax-preferred investment income that does not change proportionately with the overall change in earnings or losses before federal income taxes. 4. Preferred Securities of Subsidiary Trusts On June 24, 2003 LNC announced plans to redeem the $200 million 7.40% TOPrS issued by Lincoln Capital III and guaranteed by LNC. The redemption date was July 24, 2003. A loss of $3.6 million relating to unamortized issuance costs, will be reported in the third quarter of 2003 related to the redemption. 5. Supplemental Financial Data A roll forward of the balance sheet account, "Deferred Acquisition Costs," is as follows: Six Months Ended June 30 (in millions) 2003 2002 ---- ---- Balance at beginning-of-period $2,970.9 $2,885.3 Deferral 289.1 304.0 Amortization (164.1) (171.0) Adjustment related to realized losses on securities available-for-sale 38.3 74.3 Adjustments related to unrealized (gains) losses on securities available-for-sale (453.5) (37.2) Foreign currency translation adjustment -- 29.5 Other 16.4 (28.3) -------- -------- Balance at end-of-period $2,697.1 $3,056.6 Realized gains and losses on investments and derivative instruments on the Statements of Income for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 are net of amounts restored or (amortized) against deferred acquisition costs of $38.3 million and $74.3 million, respectively. In addition, realized gains and losses for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 are net of adjustments made to policyholder reserves of $44.8 million and $18.5 million, respectively. LNC has either a contractual obligation or has a consistent historical practice of making allocations of investment gains or losses to certain policyholders. Details underlying the income statement caption, "Underwriting, Acquisition, Insurance and Other Expenses," are as follows: <TABLE> <CAPTION> Six Months Ended Three Months Ended June 30 June 30 (in millions) 2003 2002* 2003 2002* - ------------- ----- ----- ----- ----- <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> Commissions $258.6 $292.8 $132.9 $148.6 Other volume related expenses 137.0 120.2 65.4 65.5 Operating and administrative expenses 453.2 440.1 235.4 219.4 Deferral of acquisition costs (289.1) (304.0) (140.6) (156.1) Amortization of deferred acquisition costs 164.1 171.0 64.0 100.5 Other intangibles amortization 4.0 4.2 2.0 2.0 Restructuring charges 19.0 1.6 13.5 1.6 Other 90.0 113.9 36.7 56.1 -------- ------- -------- ------- Total $836.8 $839.8 $409.3 $437.6 * 2002 amounts have been restated for the retroactive adoption of FAS 123. See Note 2 for additional information. </TABLE> The carrying amount of goodwill by reportable segment as of June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002 was as follows: (in millions) June 30, December 31, 2003 2002 ---- ---- Lincoln Retirement $64.1 $64.1 Life Insurance 855.1 855.1 Investment Management 300.7 300.7 Lincoln UK 13.7 13.3 -------- ------- Total $1,233.6 $1,233.2 The consolidated carrying value of goodwill as of June 30, 2003 changed from the balance as of December 31, 2002 as a result of the translation of the Lincoln UK balance from British pounds to U.S. dollars based on the prevailing exchange rate as of the balance sheet date. For intangible assets subject to amortization, the total gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization in total and for each major intangible asset class by segment are as follows: <TABLE> <CAPTION> As of June 30, 2003 As of December 31, 2002 (in millions) Gross Carrying Accumulated Gross Carrying Accumulated Amount Amortization Amount Amortization ------ ------------ ------ ------------ <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> Amortized Intangible Assets: Lincoln Retirement Segment: Present value of in-force $225.0 $106.7 $225.0 $102.3 Life Insurance Segment: Present value of in-force 1,254.2 398.8 1,254.2 364.1 Investment Management Segment: Client lists 103.6 65.7 103.6 61.8 Lincoln UK Segment: Present value of in-force* 354.0 107.0 344.2 106.8 -------- -------- -------- -------- Total $1,936.8 $678.2 $1,927.0 $635.0 </TABLE> * The gross carrying amount of the present value of in-force for the Lincoln UK segment changed from December 31, 2002 to June 30, 2003 due to the translation of the balances from British pounds to U.S. dollars based on the prevailing exchange rate as of the balance sheet dates. The aggregate amortization expense for other intangible assets for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 was $40.3 million and $57.5 million, respectively. The aggregate amortization expense for other intangible assets for the three months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 was $15.6 million and $33.9 million, respectively. Future estimated amortization of other intangible assets is as follows (in millions): 2003 - $43.8 2004 - $88.0 2005 - $86.3 2006 - $85.2 2007 - $84.8 Thereafter - $870.5 The 2003 amount shown above is the amortization expected for the remaining six months of 2003. 6. Restrictions, Commitments and Contingencies Statutory Restriction. LNC's insurance subsidiaries are subject to certain insurance department regulatory restrictions as to the transfer of funds and payment of dividends to the holding company. Generally, these restrictions pose no short-term liquidity concerns for the holding company. However, the acquisition of two blocks of business in 1998 resulted in negative statutory earned surplus for The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company ("LNL") which triggered certain approval requirements in order for LNL to declare and pay dividends to LNC. As a result of negative earned surplus, LNL was required to obtain the prior approval of the Indiana Insurance Commissioner ("Commissioner") before paying any dividends to LNC until its statutory earned surplus became positive. During the first quarter 2002, LNL received approval from the Commissioner to reclassify total dividends of $495 million paid to LNC in 2001 from LNL's earned surplus to paid-in-capital. This change plus the increase in statutory earned surplus from the indemnity reinsurance transaction with Swiss Re resulted in positive statutory earned surplus for LNL at December 31, 2001. In general, dividends are not subject to prior approval from the Commissioner provided LNL's statutory earned surplus is positive and such dividends do not exceed the standard limitation of the greater of 10% of total statutory earned surplus or the amount of statutory earnings in the prior calendar year. As a result of the payment of dividends and statutory losses in 2002, LNL's statutory earned surplus was negative as of December 31, 2002. The statutory losses resulted from realized losses on investments, the effect of the equity markets and the reserve strengthening in 2002 related to the reinsurance business sold to Swiss Re. Due to the negative statutory earned surplus as of December 31, 2002, any dividend(s) paid by LNL in 2003 will be subject to prior approval from the Commissioner. As occurred in 2001, dividends approved and paid while statutory earned surplus is negative are expected to be classified as a reduction to paid-in-capital. LNL is recognized as an accredited reinsurer in the state of New York, which effectively enables it to conduct reinsurance business with unrelated insurance companies that are domiciled in the state of New York. As a result, in addition to regulatory restrictions imposed by the state of Indiana, LNL is also subject to the regulatory requirements that the state of New York imposes upon accredited reinsurers. Reinsurance Contingencies. On December 7, 2001, Swiss Re acquired LNC's reinsurance operation. The transaction structure involved a series of indemnity reinsurance transactions combined with the sale of certain stock companies that comprised LNC's reinsurance operation. On October 29, 2002 LNC and Swiss Re settled disputed matters totaling about $770 million that had arisen in connection with the final closing balance sheets associated with Swiss Re's acquisition of LNC's reinsurance operations. The settlement provided for a payment by LNC of $195 million to Swiss Re, which was recorded by LNC as a reduction in deferred gain. As a result of additional information made available to LNC following the settlement with Swiss Re in the fourth quarter of 2002, LNC recorded a further reduction in the deferred gain of $51.6 million after-tax ($79.4 million pre-tax), as well as a $9.4 million after-tax ($8.3 million pre-tax) reduction in the gain on the sale of subsidiaries. As part of the dispute settlement, LNC also paid $100 million to Swiss Re in satisfaction of LNC's $100 million indemnification obligation with respect to personal accident business. As a result of this payment, LNC has no further underwriting risk with respect to the reinsurance business sold. However, because LNC has not been relieved of its legal liabilities to the underlying ceding companies with respect to the portion of the business reinsured by Swiss Re, under FAS 113, the reserves for the underlying reinsurance contracts as well as a corresponding reinsurance recoverable from Swiss Re will continue to be carried on LNC's balance sheet during the run-off period of the underlying reinsurance business. This is particularly relevant in the case of the exited personal accident and disability income reinsurance lines of business where the underlying reserves are based upon various estimates that are subject to considerable uncertainty. As a result of developments and information obtained during 2002 relating to personal accident and disability income matters, LNC increased these exited business reserves by $198.5 million after-tax ($305.4 million pre-tax). After giving effect to LNC's $100 million indemnification obligation, LNC recorded a $133.5 million after-tax ($205.4 million pre-tax) increase in reinsurance recoverable from Swiss Re with a corresponding increase in the deferred gain. Because of ongoing uncertainty related to personal accident and disability income businesses, the reserves related to these exited business lines carried on LNC's balance sheet at December 31, 2002 may ultimately prove to be either excessive or deficient. For instance, in the event that future developments indicate that these reserves should be increased, under FAS 113, LNC would record a current period non-cash charge to record the increase in reserves. Because Swiss Re is responsible for paying the underlying claims to the ceding companies, LNC would record a corresponding increase in reinsurance recoverable from Swiss Re. However, FAS 113 does not permit LNC to take the full benefit in earnings for the recording of the increase in the reinsurance recoverable in the period of the change. Rather, LNC would increase the deferred gain recognized upon the closing of the indemnity reinsurance transaction with Swiss Re and would report a cumulative amortization "catch-up" adjustment to the deferred gain balance as increased earnings recognized in the period of change. Any amount of additional increase to the deferred gain above the cumulative amortization "catch-up" adjustment must continue to be deferred and will be amortized into income in future periods over the remaining period of expected run-off of the underlying business. No cash would be transferred between LNC and Swiss Re as a result of these developments. Accordingly, even though LNC has no continuing underwriting risk, and no cash would be transferred between LNC and Swiss Re, in the event that future developments indicate LNC's June 30, 2003 personal accident or disability income reserves are deficient or redundant, FAS 113 requires LNC to adjust earnings in the period of change, with only a partial offset to earnings for the cumulative deferred gain amortization adjustment in the period of change. The remaining amount of increased gain would be amortized into earnings over the remaining run-off period of the underlying business. United Kingdom Selling Practices. Various selling practices of the Lincoln UK operations have come under scrutiny by the U.K. regulators. These include the sale and administration of individual pension products, mortgage endowments and the selling practices of City Financial Partners Limited ("CFPL"), a subsidiary company purchased in December 1997. Regarding the sale and administration of pension products to individuals, regulatory agencies have raised questions as to what constitutes appropriate advice to individuals who bought pension products as an alternative to participation in an employer-sponsored plan. In cases of alleged inappropriate advice, an extensive investigation has been or is being carried out and the individual put in a position similar to what would have been attained if the individual had remained in an employer-sponsored plan. Following allegations made by the U.K. Consumers' Association (an organization which acts on behalf of consumers of goods and services provided in the U.K.) concerning various selling practices of CFPL, LNC conducted an internal review of 5,000 ten-year savings plans sold by CFPL during the period September 1, 1998 to August 31, 2000 and, following discussions with the U.K. regulator, LNC extended this review to all customers with a ten-year savings plan sold by CFPL to determine whether the sales of those policies were appropriate. On April 16, 2003, the Financial Services Authority ("FSA") fined Lincoln UK $762,600 related to the ten-year savings plans sold by CFPL. This concluded the FSA investigation on this matter. At June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, the aggregate liability associated with Lincoln UK selling practices was $40.6 million and $82.2 million, respectively. The decrease in the aggregate liability was a result of redress payments and expenditures partially offset by exchange rate fluctuation. See discussion in LNC's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 for background on these matters including pension mis-selling, mortgage endowment and other Lincoln UK selling practice issues. The reserves for these issues are based on various estimates that are subject to considerable uncertainty. Accordingly, the aggregate liability may prove to be deficient or excessive. However, it is management's opinion that future developments regarding Lincoln UK selling practices will not materially affect the consolidated financial position of LNC. Marketing and Compliance Issues. Regulators continue to focus on market conduct and compliance issues. Under certain circumstances, companies operating in the insurance and financial services markets have been held responsible for providing incomplete or misleading sales materials and for replacing existing policies with policies that were less advantageous to the policyholder. LNC's management continues to monitor the company's sales materials and compliance procedures and is making an extensive effort to minimize any potential liability. Due to the uncertainty surrounding such matters, it is not possible to provide a meaningful estimate of the range of potential outcomes at this time; however, it is management's opinion that such future developments will not materially affect the consolidated financial position of LNC. Other Contingency Matters. LNC and its subsidiaries are involved in various pending or threatened legal proceedings, including purported class actions, arising from the conduct of business. In some instances, these proceedings include claims for unspecified or substantial punitive damages and similar types of relief in addition to amounts for alleged contractual liability or requests for equitable relief. After consultation with legal counsel and a review of available facts, it is management's opinion that these proceedings ultimately will be resolved without materially affecting the consolidated financial position of LNC. In 2001, LNL concluded the settlement of all class action lawsuits alleging fraud in the sale of LNL non-variable universal life and participating whole life policies issued between January 1, 1981 and December 31, 1998. Since 2001, LNL has reached settlements with a substantial number of the owners of policies that opted out of the class action settlement. LNL continues to defend a small number of opt out claims and lawsuits. While there is continuing uncertainty about the ultimate costs of settling the remaining opt out cases, it is management's opinion that established reserves are adequate and future developments will not materially affect the consolidated financial position of LNC. LNC and LNL have pursued claims with their liability insurance carriers for reimbursement of certain costs incurred in connection with the class action settlement and the settlement of claims and litigation brought by owners that opted out of the class action settlement. During the fourth quarter of 2002, LNC and LNL settled their claims against three liability carriers on a favorable basis. LNC and LNL continue to pursue similar claims against a fourth liability insurance carrier. State guaranty funds assess insurance companies to cover losses to policyholders of insolvent or rehabilitated companies. Mandatory assessments may be partially recovered through a reduction in future premium taxes in some states. LNC has accrued for expected assessments net of estimated future premium tax deductions. Guarantees. LNC has guarantees with off-balance-sheet risks whose contractual amounts represent credit exposure. Outstanding guarantees with off-balance sheet risks had contractual values of $21.5 million and $22.4 million at June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively. Certain subsidiaries of LNC have invested in real estate partnerships that use industrial revenue bonds to finance their projects. LNC has guaranteed the repayment of principal and interest on these bonds. Certain subsidiaries of LNC are also involved in other real estate partnerships that use conventional mortgage loans. In case of default by the partnerships, LNC has recourse to the underlying real estate. In some cases, the terms of these arrangements involve guarantees by each of the partners to indemnify the mortgagor in the event a partner is unable to pay its principal and interest payments. These guarantees expire in 2003 through 2012. In addition, certain subsidiaries of LNC have sold commercial mortgage loans through grantor trusts, which issued pass-through certificates. These subsidiaries have agreed to repurchase any mortgage loans which remain delinquent for 90 days at a repurchase price substantially equal to the outstanding principal balance plus accrued interest thereon to the date of repurchase. In case of default on the mortgage loans, LNC has recourse to the underlying real estate. It is management's opinion that the value of the properties underlying these commitments is sufficient that in the event of default, the impact would not be material to LNC. These guarantees expire in 2004 through 2009. Derivative Instruments. LNC maintains an overall risk management strategy that incorporates the use of derivative instruments to minimize significant unplanned fluctuations in earnings that are caused by interest rate risk, foreign currency risk, equity risk, and credit risk. LNC assesses these risks by continually identifying and monitoring changes in interest rate exposure, foreign currency exposure, equity market exposure, and credit exposure that may adversely impact expected future cash flows and by evaluating hedging opportunities. Derivative instruments that are currently used as part of LNC's interest rate risk management strategy include interest rate swaps, interest rate caps and swaptions. Derivative instruments that are used as part of LNC's foreign currency risk management strategy include foreign currency swaps and foreign exchange forwards. Call options on LNC stock are used as part of LNC's equity market risk management strategy. LNC also uses credit default swaps as part of its credit risk management strategy. By using derivative instruments, LNC is exposed to credit and market risk. If the counterparty fails to perform, credit risk is equal to the extent of the fair value gain in the derivative. When the fair value of a derivative contract is positive, this generally indicates that the counterparty owes LNC and, therefore, creates a payment risk for LNC. When the fair value of a derivative contract is negative, LNC owes the counterparty and therefore LNC has no payment risk. LNC minimizes the credit (or payment) risk in derivative instruments by entering into transactions with high quality counterparties that are reviewed periodically by LNC. LNC also maintains a policy of requiring that all derivative contracts be governed by an International Swaps and Derivatives Association ("ISDA") Master Agreement. LNC and LNL are required to maintain minimum ratings as a matter of routine practice in negotiating ISDA agreements. Under the majority of ISDA agreements and as a matter of policy, LNL has agreed to maintain financial strength or claims-paying ratings above S&P BBB and Moody's Baa2. LNC is required to maintain long-term senior debt ratings above S&P BBB and Moody's Baa2. A downgrade below these levels would result in termination of the derivatives contract at which time any amounts payable by LNC would be dependent on the market value of the underlying derivative contract. In certain transactions, LNC and the counterparty have entered into a collateral support agreement requiring LNC to post collateral upon significant downgrade. LNC also requires for its own protection minimum rating standards for counterparty credit protection. LNL is required to maintain financial strength or claims-paying ratings above S&P A- and Moody's A3 under certain ISDA agreements, which collectively do not represent material notional exposure. LNC does not believe the inclusion of termination or collateralization events pose any material threat to its liquidity position. Market risk is the adverse effect that a change in interest rates, currency rates, implied volatility rates, or a change in certain equity indexes or instruments has on the value of a financial instrument. LNC manages the market risk by establishing and monitoring limits as to the types and degree of risk that may be undertaken. LNC's derivative instruments are monitored by its risk management committee as part of that committee's oversight of LNC's derivative activities. LNC's derivative instruments committee is responsible for implementing various hedging strategies that are developed through its analysis of financial simulation models and other internal and industry sources. The resulting hedging strategies are then incorporated into LNC's overall risk management strategies. 7. Segment Disclosures LNC has four business segments: Lincoln Retirement (formerly known as the Annuities segment), Life Insurance, Investment Management and Lincoln UK. <TABLE> <CAPTION> The following tables show financial data by segment: Six Months Three Months Ended June 30 Ended June 30 (in millions) 2003 2002 (1) 2003 2002 (1) ------------- ---- ---- ---- ---- <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> Revenue: Lincoln Retirement $884.2 $895.6 $486.4 $442.6 Life Insurance 931.5 863.8 474.0 439.8 Investment Management (2) 218.5 213.4 116.4 106.1 Lincoln UK 129.1 133.6 60.2 80.5 Other operations 316.3 331.4 156.7 164.7 Consolidating adjustments (167.1) (154.4) (80.6) (76.2) -------- -------- -------- -------- Total $2,312.5 $2,283.4 $1,213.1 $1,157.5 Income (Loss) before Federal Income Taxes (Tax Benefits): Lincoln Retirement $85.7 $42.9 $99.0 $(2.2) Life Insurance 164.4 142.0 95.7 79.4 Investment Management 9.1 2.4 7.2 (1.0) Lincoln UK 29.7 18.8 19.0 9.0 Other operations (includes interest expense) (65.8) (63.7) (33.2) (38.3) Consolidating adjustments -- -- -- -- -------- -------- -------- -------- Total $223.1 $142.4 $187.7 $46.9 Federal Income Taxes (Tax Benefits): Lincoln Retirement $(2.9) $(12.8) $17.3 $(11.3) Life Insurance 50.3 41.8 30.1 22.7 Investment Management 3.5 1.1 2.6 (0.2) Lincoln UK 10.4 (0.7) 6.6 (0.3) Other operations (22.5) (21.1) (11.6) (12.5) Consolidating adjustments -- -- -- -- -------- -------- -------- -------- Total $38.8 $8.3 $45.0 $(1.6) Net Income (Loss): Lincoln Retirement $88.6 $55.7 $81.7 $9.2 Life Insurance 114.1 100.2 65.6 56.7 Investment Management 5.6 1.3 4.6 (0.8) Lincoln UK 19.3 19.5 12.4 9.2 Other operations (includes interest expense) (43.3) (42.5) (21.6) (25.8) Consolidating adjustments -- -- -- -- -------- -------- -------- -------- Total $184.3 $134.2 $142.7 $48.5 <CAPTION> June 30 December 31 (in millions) 2003 2002 (1) ------------- ---- ---- <S> <C> <C> Assets: Lincoln Retirement $56,669.9 $52,896.4 Life Insurance 20,583.5 19,591.6 Investment Management 1,481.1 1,461.4 Lincoln UK 7,735.8 7,327.1 Other operations 15,122.8 13,951.4 Consolidating adjustments (2,060.3) (2,043.3) -------- --------- Total $99,532.8 $93,184.6 (1) 2002 amounts have been restated for the retroactive adoption of FAS 123. See Note 2 for additional information. (2) Revenues for the Investment Management segment include inter-segment revenues for asset management services provided to the other segments of LNC. These inter-segment revenues totaled $49.6 million and $49.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, and $25.4 million and $24.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. </TABLE> 8. Earnings Per Share Per share amounts for net income are shown on the income statement using 1) an earnings per common share basic calculation and 2) an earnings per common share-assuming dilution calculation. Reconciliations of the factors used in the two calculations are as follows: <TABLE> <CAPTION> Six Months Three Months Ended June 30 Ended June 30 2003 2002 (1) 2003 2002 (1) ---- ---- ---- ---- <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> Numerator: [in millions] Net income, as used in basic calculation (1) $184.3 $134.2 $142.7 $48.5 Dividends on convertible preferred stock and adjustments for minority interests * * * * ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ Net income, as used in diluted calculation $184.3 $134.2 $142.7 $48.5 * Less than $100,000. Denominator: [number of shares] Weighted-average shares, as used in basic calculation 177,114,725 186,367,782 177,218,568 185,892,541 Shares to cover conversion of preferred stock 311,385 348,481 306,085 337,207 Shares to cover non-vested stock 73,141 40,455 95,636 34,619 Average stock options outstanding during the period 6,382,767 16,457,348 6,377,143 14,720,064 Assumed acquisition of shares with assumed proceeds and benefits from exercising stock options (at average market price during the period) (5,587,472) (13,383,816) (5,428,905) (12,117,474) Shares repurchaseable from measured but unrecognized stock option expense (448,845) (1,442,144) (291,655) (1,174,826) Average deferred compensation shares 934,302 836,765 934,669 835,836 Numerator: [in millions] ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ Weighted-average shares, as used in diluted calculation 178,780,003 189,224,871 179,211,541 188,527,967 (1) 2002 net income amounts have been restated for the retroactive adoption of FAS 123. See Note 2 for additional information. In the event the average market price of LNC's common stock exceeds the issue price of stock options, such options would be dilutive to LNC's earnings per share and will be shown in the table above. Participants in LNC's deferred compensation plans, who select LNC stock for measuring the investment return attributable to their deferral amounts, will be paid out in LNC stock. The obligation to satisfy these deferred compensation plan liabilities is dilutive and is shown in the table above. </TABLE> 9. Employee Benefit Plans Stock Compensation. Refer to Note 6 to the audited financial statements in LNC's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, for a detailed discussion of this matter. <TABLE> <CAPTION> LNC Stock Options Information with respect to the LNC incentive plans involving stock options is as follows: Options Outstanding Options Exercisable ------------------- ------------------- Weighted-Average Weighted-Average Shares Exercise Price Shares Exercise Price - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> Balance at December 31, 2002 18,608,009 $38.89 10,883,053 $38.87 Granted-original 410,896 25.41 Granted-reloads 94,436 31.30 Exercised (includes shares tendered) (466,839) 32.70 Forfeited (472,587) 41.78 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Balance at June 30, 2003 18,173,915 $38.84 13,568,082 $38.96 Total compensation expense for LNC incentive plans involving stock options for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 was $12.8 million after-tax ($18.0 million pre-tax) and $15.6 million after-tax ($21.6 million pre-tax), respectively. Total compensation expense for LNC incentive plans involving stock options for the three months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 was $6.9 million after-tax ($9.8 million pre-tax) and $8.6 million after-tax ($12.0 million pre-tax), respectively. </TABLE> Performance Vesting Awards Effective January 1, 2003, LNC's employee stock option compensation plan and long-term cash incentive compensation plan were revised and combined to provide for performance vesting, and to provide for awards that may be paid out in a combination of LNC stock options, performance shares of LNC stock and cash. The performance measures for the initial grant under the new plan will compare LNC's performance relative to a selected group of peer companies, over a three-year performance measurement period. Comparative performance measures for these initial awards are: relative growth in earnings per share, return on equity and total share performance. Certain participants in the new plans selected from various combinations of stock options, performance shares and cash in determining the form of their award. Other participants will have their award paid in performance shares. New grants of LNC option awards are expected to be made under the general terms of this new performance-vesting plan. However, the separate stock option incentive plans previously established by Delaware Investments U.S., Inc. ("DIUS") and DIAL Holding Company, Inc. ("DIAL"), both wholly-owned subsidiaries of Delaware Management Holdings, Inc., are expected to continue under their existing plan designs. See the information provided below under the caption "Delaware Investments U.S., Inc. ("DIUS") and DIAL Holding Company, Inc. ("DIAL") Plans. In the first six months of 2003, LNC granted a combination of performance vesting stock options, performance share units and performance vesting cash awards under the new plan. These awards consisted of 319,786 10-year LNC stock options, 756,737 performance share units that could result in the issuance of LNC shares, and cash awards. The ultimate amount of stock to be issued for either the stock option or performance share awards, or cash to be paid for the cash awards will be determined by the level of achievement on LNC's three performance measures over the three-year performance measurement period. Information with respect to the expenses recorded for awards under these programs is as follows: Periods Ended June 30, 2003 ----------------------------------------------- Six Months Three Months After-Tax Pre-Tax After-Tax Pre-Tax ----------------------------------------------- Stock Options $0.1 $0.2 $0.1 $0.1 Performance Shares 2.1 3.2 1.0 1.6 Cash Awards 0.3 0.4 0.1 0.2 The amount of stock option expense for the performance vesting awards is included in the total LNC stock option expense as discussed above under the caption "LNC Stock Options." All expense calculations for performance vesting stock options, performance shares, and performance vesting cash awards that were granted in the second quarter of 2003 have been based upon the current assumption that the actual performance achievement over the three-year performance measurement period will result in target levels of long-term incentive compensation payouts. As the three-year performance period progresses, LNC will continue to refine its estimate of the expense associated with these awards so that by the end of the three-year performance period, LNC's cumulative expense will reflect the actual level of awards that vest. Stock Appreciation Rights ("SARs") Information with respect to the LNC incentive plan involving SARs is as follows: <TABLE> <CAPTION> SARs Outstanding SARs Exercisable ---------------- ---------------- Weighted- Weighted- Average Average Shares Exercise Price Shares Exercise Price - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> Balance at December 31, 2002 1,382,248 $39.20 301,108 $32.06 Granted-original 326,650 25.27 Exercised (includes shares tendered) (29,200) 33.90 Forfeited (29,550) 38.74 -------- -------- Balance at June 30, 2003 1,650,148 $36.71 638,143 $35.85 Total compensation expense for the LNC incentive plan involving SARs for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 was $1.1 million after-tax ($1.7 million pre-tax) and $0.4 million after-tax ($0.6 million pre-tax), respectively. Total compensation expense (income) for the LNC incentive plan involving SARs for the three months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 was $1.6 million after-tax ($2.5 million pre-tax) and $(0.9) million after-tax ($(1.3) million pre-tax), respectively. As discussed in Note 6 to the audited financial statements in LNC's annual report on Form 10K, compensation expense (income) for the LNC incentive plan involving SARs represents the net amount of the mark-to-market adjustment for options to acquire LNC shares purchased at the time of the grants, combined with the change in LNC's stock price compared to the SAR's grant price. </TABLE> Delaware Investments U.S., Inc. ("DIUS") and DIAL Holding Company, Inc. ("DIAL") Plans At June 30, 2003, DIUS had 10,000,000 shares of common stock outstanding. Information with respect to the DIUS incentive plan involving stock options is as follows: <TABLE> <CAPTION> Options Options Outstanding Exercisable ------------------- ------------------- Weighted- Weighted- Average Average Shares Exercise Price Shares Exercise Price - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> Balance at December 31, 2002 1,087,996 $104.31 280,877 $103.61 Granted-original 277,200 98.71 Exercised (includes shares tendered) -- -- Forfeited (161,256) 104.68 -------- -------- Balance at June 30, 2003 1,203,940 $102.97 231,685 $104.24 </TABLE> At June 30, 2003, DIAL had 10,000,000 shares of common stock outstanding. Information with respect to the DIAL incentive plan involving stock options is as follows: <TABLE> <CAPTION> Options Options Outstanding Exercisable ------------------- ------------------- Weighted- Weighted- Average Average Shares Exercise Price Shares Exercise Price - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> Balance at December 31, 2002 1,088,010 $25.76 202,703 $25.47 Granted-original 583,579 26.79 Exercised (includes shares tendered) -- -- Forfeited (45,686) 25.76 -------- -------- Balance at June 30, 2003 1,625,903 $26.13 260,581 $25.76 Compensation expense for the DIUS and DIAL incentive plan involving stock options for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 totaled $4.6 million after-tax ($6.4 million pre-tax) and $4.1 million after-tax ($5.9 million pre-tax), respectively. Compensation expense for the DIUS and DIAL incentive plan involving stock options for the three months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 totaled $2.6 million after-tax ($3.7 million pre-tax) and $2.3 million after-tax ($3.3 million pre-tax), respectively. </TABLE> 10. Restructuring Charges Included in the discussion below are restructuring plans that were implemented during the years 1999 through 2002 that were not yet completed as of December 31, 2002. Any restructuring plans that were implemented during the years 1999 through 2001 that were completed as of December 31, 2002 are not included in the discussion below. For discussion of these completed plans, see Note 12 to the audited financial statements of LNC's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002. The aggregate charges associated with the restructuring plans were included in Underwriting, Acquisition, Insurance and Other Expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Income in the period incurred. 1999 Restructuring Plan During 1999, LNC implemented a restructuring plan relating to the streamlining of Lincoln UK's operations. The following table provides information about this restructuring plan. Lincoln UK (in millions) Plan ------------- ------- Employee severance and termination benefits $3.9 Other Costs- Rent on abandoned office space 6.1 ------- 1999 Restructuring Charge (pre-tax) 10.0 Amounts expended through December 31, 2002 7.5 Amounts reversed through December 31, 2002 -- ------- Restructuring reserve at December 31, 2002 2.5 Amounts expended in the first six months of 2003 0.9 Amounts reversed in the first six months of 2003 -- ------- Restructuring reserve at June 30, 2003 $1.6 ======= Positions to be eliminated under original plan 119 Actual positions eliminated through June 30, 2003 112 Expected completion date 2016 2000 Restructuring Plan During 2000, LNC implemented a restructuring plan relating to the exit of all direct sales and sales support operations of Lincoln UK and the consolidation of its Uxbridge home office with its Barnwood home office. The following table provides information about this restructuring plan. Lincoln UK (in millions) Plan ------------- ------- Employee severance and termination benefits $29.8 Write-off of impaired assets 39.2 Other Costs 30.4 ------- 2000 Restructuring Charge (pre-tax) 99.4 Amounts expended and written-off through December 31, 2002 88.0 Amounts reversed through December 31, 2002 1.7 ------- Restructuring reserve at December 31, 2002 9.7 Amounts expended in the first six months of 2003 1.0 Amounts reversed in the first six months of 2003 -- ------- Restructuring reserve at June 30, 2003 $8.7 ======= Positions to be eliminated under original plan 671 Actual positions eliminated through June 30, 2003 671 Expected completion date 2015 2001 Restructuring Plan During 2001, LNC implemented restructuring plans relating to 1) the elimination of duplicative functions in the Schaumburg, Illinois operations of First Penn-Pacific (FPP), and the absorption of these functions into the Lincoln Retirement and Life Insurance segment operations in Fort Wayne, Indiana and Hartford, Connecticut, respectively; 2) the planned consolidation of the Boston, Massachusetts investment and marketing office with the Philadelphia, Pennsylvania investment and marketing operations in order to eliminate redundant facilities and functions within the Investment Management segment; 3) the combination of LFD channel oversight, positioning of LFD to take better advantage of ongoing "marketplace consolidation" and expansion of the customer base of wholesalers in certain non-productive territories, recorded in "Other Operations"; and 4) the consolidation of operations and space in LNC's Fort Wayne, Indiana operations, recorded in "Other Operations". The following table provides information about these restructuring plans. <TABLE> <CAPTION> Schaumburg Boston Office LFD Plan- Fort Wayne (in millions) Plan Consolidation 4th Quarter Operations Total ------------- ---------- ------------- ----------- ---------- ----- <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> Employee severance and termination benefits $3.2 $-- $3.8 $0.3 $7.3 Write-off of impaired assets -- 0.1 - 3.2 3.3 Other Costs: Termination of equipment leases -- -- -- 1.4 1.4 Rent on abandoned office space 0.9 0.5 -- 19.5 20.9 ------- ------- ------- ------- ------ Total 2001 Restructuring Charges (pre-tax) 4.1 0.6 3.8 24.4 32.9 Amounts expended and written-off through Dec. 31, 2002 3.7 0.2 3.8 22.3 30.0 Amounts reversed through December 31, 2002 0.1 -- -- 1.5 1.6 ------- ------- ------- ------- ------ Restructuring reserve at December 31, 2002 0.3 0.4 -- 0.6 1.3 Amounts expended in the first six months of 2003 0.1 -- -- 0.4 0.5 Amounts reversed in the first six months of 2003 -- -- -- -- -- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------ Restructuring reserve at June 30, 2003 $0.2 $0.4 $-- $0.2 $0.8 ======= ======= ======= ======= ====== Positions to be eliminated under original plan 27 - 63 9 Actual positions eliminated through June 30, 2003 26 - 62 19 Expected completion date 1st Quarter 2004 4th Quarter 2005 Completed 2nd Quarter 2004 </TABLE> 2002 Restructuring Plan During the second quarter of 2002, Lincoln Retirement completed a review of its entire internal information technology organization. As a result of that review, Lincoln Retirement decided in the second quarter of 2002 to reorganize its IT organization in order to better align the activities and functions conducted within its own organization and its IT service providers. This change was made in order to focus Lincoln Retirement on its goal of achieving a common administrative platform for its annuities products, to better position the organization and its service providers to respond to changing market conditions, and to reduce overall costs in response to increased competitive pressures. The following table provides information about this restructuring plan. Lincoln Retirement (in millions) Plan ------------- ------- Employee severance and termination benefits $1.6 ------- 2002 Restructuring Charge (pre-tax) 1.6 Amounts expended through December 31, 2002 0.9 Amounts reversed through December 31, 2002 -- ------- Restructuring reserve at December 31, 2002 0.7 Amounts expended in the first six months of 2003 0.6 Amounts reversed in the first six months of 2003 -- ------- Restructuring reserve at June 30, 2003 $0.1 ======= Positions to be eliminated under original plan 49 Actual positions eliminated through June 30, 2003 49 Expected completion date Third quarter 2003 2003 Restructuring Plan In January 2003, the Life Insurance segment announced that it was realigning its operations in Hartford, Connecticut and Schaumburg, Illinois to enhance productivity, efficiency and scalability while positioning the segment for future growth. In February 2003, Lincoln Retirement announced plans to consolidate its fixed annuity operations in Schaumburg, Illinois into Fort Wayne, Indiana. In June 2003, LNC announced that it will combine its retirement and life insurance businesses into a single operating unit focused on providing wealth accumulation and protection, income distribution and wealth transfer products. The realigned organization is expected to significantly reduce operating expenses while positioning LNC for future growth and to take advantage of the recent market recovery. The following table provides information about these restructuring plans. <TABLE> <CAPTION> Retirement and Life Life Insurance Fixed Annuity Insurance Realignment Consolidation Combination (in millions) Jan 2003 Feb 2003 June 2003 Total ------------- ---------- ------------- ----------- ---------- <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> Employee severance and termination benefits $4.1 $1.0 $2.9 $8.0 Write-off of impaired assets 1.9 -- -- $1.9 Other Costs: Rent on abandoned office space 6.0 2.2 -- $8.2 Other 0.8 0.1 -- $0.9 ------- ------- ------- ------- Total 2003 Restructuring Charges (pre-tax) 12.8 3.3 2.9 $19.0 Amounts expended in the first six months of 2003 5.5 3.3 2.9 $11.7 Amounts reversed in the first six months of 2003 -- -- -- -- ------- ------- ------- ------- Restructuring reserve at June 30, 2003 $7.3 $-- $-- $7.3 ======= ======= ======= ======= Positions to be eliminated under original plan 147 64 To be determined Actual positions eliminated through June 30, 2003 135 52 3 Expected completion date Second Second Quarter 2006 Quarter 2006 To be determined </TABLE> 11. Subsequent Event On August 4, 2003, LNC announced that in addition to the previously announced realignment of LNC's life and annuity businesses (see 2003 Restructuring Plan within Note 9 above), it is taking further action to position LNC for future growth. The actions are expected to be impact all domestic operations. Charges of approximately $95 million are expected to be incurred during 2003, which includes $19 million incurred as restructuring charges through June 30, 2003. Item 2 Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Information - ------ Forward Looking Statements - Cautionary Language This report, among other things, reviews the results of operations of LNC Consolidated, LNC's four business segments and "Other Operations"; LNC's consolidated investments; and consolidated financial condition including liquidity, cash flows and capital resources. Historical financial information is presented and analyzed. This report and other written or oral statements made by LNC or on LNC's behalf may contain forward-looking statements. Where appropriate, factors that may affect future financial performance are identified and discussed. Certain statements made in this report are "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the "Act"). A forward-looking statement is any statement that is not a historical fact and, without limitation, includes any statement that may predict, forecast, indicate or imply future results, performance or achievements, and may contain words like: "believe", "anticipate", "expect", "estimate", "project", "will", "shall" and other words or phrases with similar meaning. LNC claims the protection afforded by the safe harbor for forward-looking statements provided by the Act. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from the results contained in the forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include, among others, subsequent significant changes in: * the Company (e.g., acquisitions and divestitures of legal entities and blocks of business - directly or by means of reinsurance transactions); * financial markets (e.g., interest rates and securities markets and stock and bond market performance); * the performance of the investment portfolios of LNC's subsidiaries and of the portfolios which they manage (both internal and external); * competitors and competing products and services; * LNC's ability to operate its businesses in a relatively normal manner; * legislation (e.g., corporate, individual, estate and product taxation) including the Bush Administration's tax proposals on dividends and retirement savings; * the price of LNC's stock; * accounting principles generally accepted in the United States; * regulations (e.g., insurance and securities regulations); * debt and claims-paying ratings issued by nationally recognized statistical rating organizations; and * the National Association of Insurance Commissioners' ("NAIC") capital requirements. * future interpretations of NAIC Actuarial Guidelines may require LNC to establish additional statutory reserves for guaranteed minimum death benefits under variable annuity contracts. Other risks and uncertainties include: * the risk that significant accounting, fraud or corporate governance issues may adversely affect the value of certain investments in the portfolios of LNC's companies; * the risk that the LNC could have to accelerate amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs if the market continues to deteriorate; * the risk that the LNC could have to write off investments in certain securities if the issuers' financial condition deteriorates; * the risks associated with having products with guaranteed benefits; * whether necessary regulatory approvals are obtained (e.g., insurance department, Hart-Scott-Rodino, etc.) and, if obtained, whether they are obtained on a timely basis; * whether proceeds from divestitures of legal entities and blocks of business can be used as planned; * risks associated with litigation, arbitration and other actions such as: (a) adverse decisions in significant actions including, but not limited to extra-contractual and class action damage cases; (b) new decisions which change the law; (c) unexpected trial court rulings; (d) unavailability of witnesses; (e) newly discovered evidence and (f) acts of God (e.g., hurricanes, earthquakes and storms); * whether there will be significant charges or benefits resulting from the contingencies described in the footnotes to LNC's consolidated financial statements; * risks associated with acts of terrorism or war; * the stability of governments in countries in which LNC's subsidiaries do business; and * other insurance risks (e.g., policyholder mortality and morbidity). The risks included here are not exhaustive. Other sections of this report, and LNC's annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and other documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission include additional factors which could impact LNC's business and financial performance. Moreover, LNC operates in a rapidly changing and competitive environment. New risk factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible for management to predict all such risk factors. Further, it is not possible to assess the impact of all risk factors on LNC's business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. Given these risks and uncertainties, investors should not place undo reliance on forward-looking statements as a prediction of actual results. In addition, LNC disclaims any obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that occur after the date of this report. Critical Accounting Policies Refer to Management's Discussion and Analysis of LNC's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, for a detailed discussion of LNC's critical accounting policies. Refer to the various sections captioned Critical Accounting Policy within the discussion that follows for updates to the information provided in the Form 10-K. All amounts stated in this "Management's Discussion and Analysis" are on an after-tax basis except where specifically noted as pre-tax. <TABLE> <CAPTION> RESULTS OF CONSOLIDATED OPERATIONS Summary Financial Results Six Months Ended Three Months Ended June 30 June 30 (in millions) 2003 2002 2003 2002 - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> Insurance premiums and fees $816.9 $868.3 $413.8 $436.8 Investment advisory fees 93.5 95.8 49.4 47.8 Net investment income 1,314.9 1,312.2 660.2 657.4 Realized loss on investments and derivative instruments (94.1) (184.4) (2.7) (81.0) Other revenue and fees 181.3 191.5 92.5 96.5 ------- ------- ------- ------- Total Revenue 2,312.5 2,283.4 1,213.2 1,157.5 Insurance benefits 1,206.2 1,251.7 593.2 648.3 Underwriting, acquisition, insurance and other expenses 836.9 839.8 409.3 437.6 Interest and debt expenses 46.3 49.4 23.0 24.7 ------- ------- ------- ------- Total Benefits and Expenses 2,089.4 2,140.9 1,025.5 1,110.6 Income Before Federal Income Taxes 223.1 142.5 187.7 46.9 Federal income taxes 38.8 8.3 45.0 (1.6) ------- ------- ------- ------- Net Income $184.3 $134.2 $142.7 $48.5 Items Included in Net Income: Realized Loss on Investments and Derivative Instruments (after-tax) $(61.2) $(119.9) $(1.7) $(52.4) Restructuring Charges (after-tax) (12.4) (1.0) (8.8) (1.0) Reserve Development on Business Sold Through Indemnity Reinsurance and Related Amortization of Deferred Gain (after-tax) $(0.2) $(14.4) $(0.1) $(14.4) </TABLE> LNC has the following business segments: Lincoln Retirement, Life Insurance, Investment Management and Lincoln UK. Operations not directly related to the business segments and unallocated corporate items (i.e., corporate investment income, interest expense on corporate debt, unallocated overhead expenses, the operations of Lincoln Financial Advisors ("LFA") and Lincoln Financial Distributors ("LFD") and the amortization of the deferred gain on the sale of Lincoln Re) are reported in "Other Operations". Stock-Based Compensation The periods presented for 2002 have been restated for the adoption of FAS 148. See the discussion under the topic "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation" presented in the Consolidated Results of Operations for further discussion of this matter. The effect of the adoption was a decrease in net income of $19.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002 and $10.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002 from previously reported amounts. Net Income Net income for the six months ended June 30, 2003 increased by $50.1 million, or 37%, compared to the same period in 2002. Net income for the three months ended June 30, 2003 increased by $94.2 million over the same period in 2002. Net realized losses on investments and derivative instruments were $58.7 million and $50.7 million lower in the six and three months ended June 30, 2003, respectively, than in the same periods of 2002. Net realized investment losses for the first six months of 2002 were largely due to sales and write-downs of investments in Worldcom, other telecommunications issuers and collateralized debt obligations. Write-downs for impairments were required for the six months ended June 30, 2003 for securities held within primarily the airline industry, electric utilities and asset-backed securities (ABS). For additional detail on realized losses see the discussion in the Consolidated Investment section. For the six months ended June 30, 2003, the equity markets experienced overall improvement as the S&P index at June 30, 2003 was 11% higher than December 31, 2002, with all of the improvement occurring in the three months ended June 30, 2003. The S&P index gained 15% in the second quarter of 2003, but ended the period 1.5% lower than June 30, 2002. The equity market improvement from December 31, 2002 increased LNC's overall results by $3.5 million in the first six months of 2003, and $25.4 million in the second quarter of 2003, primarily within the Lincoln Retirement segment. Excluding the $5.9 million impact of the No Change Effect on GMDB, the equity market impact in the second quarter of 2003 relative to the first quarter of 2003 was $31.3 million. The following table displays the impact of the improvement in the equity markets by segment for the first six months of 2003. Impact of the Equity Markets by Segment ($ Millions) <TABLE> <CAPTION> Segment --------------------------------------------- Lincoln Life Investment Retirement Insurance Management Lincoln UK LNC Total --------------------------------------------------------- <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> Fees- Lagging Effect of 4Q02 Market Changes on 1Q03 $(0.5) $-- $0.1 $(0.1) $(0.5) Fees- Lagging Effect of 1Q03 Market Changes on 2Q03 (0.8) -- (0.1) (0.1) (1.0) Fees- Current Effects in 1Q03 (1.0) -- (0.5) (0.5) (2.0) Fees- Current Effects in 2Q03 6.0 0.3 2.7 0.4 9.4 --------------------------------------------------------- Total Fee Income 3.7 0.3 2.2 (0.3) 5.9 Other 1.5 1.5 GMDB-No Change Effect 1Q03 (5.9) -- -- -- (5.9) GMDB-Market Change Effect 1Q03 (7.5) -- -- -- (7.5) GMDB-No Change Effect 2Q03 (5.9) -- -- -- (5.9) GMDB-Market Change Effect 2Q03 13.6 -- -- -- 13.6 --------------------------------------------------------- Total GMDB (5.7) -- -- -- (5.7) DAC/DFEL 1Q03 (1.8) (0.6) -- (3.6) (6.0) DAC/DFEL 2Q03 2.7 1.3 -- 3.8 7.8 --------------------------------------------------------- Total Effect $0.4 $1.0 $2.2 $(0.1) $3.5 </TABLE> The following table displays the impact of the improvement in the equity markets by segment for the second quarter of 2003. Impact of the Equity Markets by Segment ($ Millions) <TABLE> <CAPTION> Segment --------------------------------------------- Lincoln Life Investment Retirement Insurance Management Lincoln UK LNC Total --------------------------------------------------------- <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> Fees- Lagging Effect of 1Q03 Market Changes on 2Q03 $(0.8) $-- $(0.1) $(0.1) $(1.0) Fees- Current Effects in 2Q03 6.0 0.3 2.7 0.4 9.4 --------------------------------------------------------- Total Fee Income 5.2 0.3 2.6 0.3 8.4 Other 1.5 1.5 GMDB-No Change Effect 2Q03 (5.9) -- -- -- (5.9) GMDB-Market Change Effect 2Q03 13.6 -- -- -- 13.6 --------------------------------------------------------- Total GMDB 7.7 -- -- -- 7.7 DAC/DFEL 2Q03 2.7 1.3 -- 3.8 7.8 --------------------------------------------------------- Total Effect $17.1 $1.6 $2.6 $4.1 $25.4 </TABLE> See the discussion of results of operations for each business segment for additional details on the impact of the equity markets for the six and three months ended June 30, 2003. See the discussion presented below under the topic "Third Quarter 2003 Guidance for the Estimated Effect of Equity Market Volatility" for information regarding the factors that LNC uses to estimate the expected effect of equity market volatility for the upcoming quarter. Revenue Consolidated revenue increased primarily due to the declines in net realized investment losses for both the six month and three month periods ended June 30, 2003 compared to the same periods last year. Strong sales in the Life Insurance segment combined with growth in the Investment Management segment in assets under management resulting from favorable net flows and the effects of the equity markets also contributed to these increases. These improvements were partially offset by lower fee income in the Lincoln Retirement and Lincoln UK segments from the impact of declines in the equity markets from June 30, 2002 to June 30, 2003 on average variable annuities (Retirement) and unit-linked account values (Lincoln UK). Expenses Consolidated expenses were favorably affected by the improvement in the equity markets in the first six months of 2003, which resulted in positive unlocking of deferred acquisition costs ("DAC") and present value of in-force ("PVIF") in the Lincoln Retirement and Lincoln UK business segments, decreased reserves and payments for guaranteed minimum death benefits in the Lincoln Retirement segment. For further discussion of the results of operations see the discussion of the results of operations by segment. Consolidated Deposits and Net Flows LNC's domestic consolidated product deposits and net cash flows were as follows: <TABLE> <CAPTION> Periods ended June 30, Six Months Three Months (in billions) 2003 2002 2003 2002 - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> Deposits (1): Lincoln Retirement Segment $2.8 $3.3 $1.4 $1.6 Life Insurance Segment 1.0 1.0 0.5 0.6 Investment Management Segment (including both retail and institutional deposits) 4.3 5.2 2.1 2.6 Consolidating Adjustments (2) (0.3) (0.5) (0.2) (0.3) ---------------------------------------------------- Total Deposits $7.8 $9.0 $3.8 $4.5 Net Flows (1): Lincoln Retirement Segment $0.2 $0.3 $0.1 $0.2 Life Insurance Segment 0.6 0.6 0.3 0.4 Investment Management Segment (including both retail and institutional net flows) 0.9 1.4 0.6 0.6 Consolidating Adjustments (2) 0.2 -- -- -- ---------------------------------------------------- Total Net Flows $1.9 $2.3 $1.0 $1.2 (1) For additional detail of deposit and net flow information see the discussion of the Results of Operations by Segment. (2) Consolidating adjustments represent the elimination of deposits and net cash flows on products affecting more than one segment. </TABLE> Third Quarter 2003 Guidance for the Estimated Effect of Equity Market Volatility After the first quarter of 2003, Lincoln National Corporation ("LNC") provided guidance on the estimated effect of equity market volatility on its second quarter of 2003 results. The following guidance is being provided for purposes of modeling the expected effects of equity market volatility for the third quarter of 2003. As will be explained in greater detail below, the effects on LNC's results of significant volatility in equity markets are complex and are not expected to be proportional for market increases and market decreases. The third quarter of 2003 information provided below is based upon market conditions and LNC's mix of business as of the end of the second quarter of 2003. All amounts provided in this guidance are on an after-tax basis. This guidance can be expected to change as actual circumstances change. Although LNC believes this guidance provides reasonable estimates based upon conditions as of July 1, 2003, actual results may differ materially from those projected and LNC claims no responsibility for updating this forward-looking information (see Forward-Looking Statements - Cautionary Language at the beginning of Item 2.) This guidance is intended to provide a general indication of the expected effect of equity market volatility on LNC's fee income; deferred acquisition costs ("DAC") and present value of in-force ("PVIF") intangible assets; deferred front-end load revenue ("DFEL"); and guaranteed minimum death benefit ("GMDB") reserves. Excluded from this guidance is the effect that equity market changes may have upon LNC's realized and unrealized gains and losses on investments and intangible assets, other than DAC and PVIF. For example, write-downs for impairment of goodwill and deferred dealer commission assets may be necessary under certain market conditions. These matters are not included within the guidance provided in this document. Market Indices Used For Modeling LNC's Various Operating Segments In measuring the estimated effects of changes in equity markets on its Lincoln Retirement segment, LNC uses the S&P 500 index. LNC has generally found that the S&P 500 index is reasonably correlated to the effect of overall equity markets performance on this segment's account values. Because LNC's fee income earned on its variable annuity business is determined daily, the change in the S&P 500 on a daily average basis relative to the level of the S&P 500 at the beginning of each quarter provides a reasonable indication of the impact quarterly changes in equity markets have on Lincoln Retirement's fee income. Because end of period account values are used for computing DAC unlocking and for incurred GMDB costs, the end of period change in the S&P 500 is used in measuring the estimated market impact of DAC unlocking and for the impact associated with incurred GMDB costs. In addition, because DAC and GMDB calculations have an assumed 9% positive annual equity market return, or a 2.25% quarterly assumption, variances in actual market performance relative to these calculation assumptions will generate positive or negative DAC unlocking and GMDB adjustments. Further, the GMDB reserve adjustment results in an increase or decrease to actual gross profits and therefore has an inverse impact on DAC amortization. The interplay of GMDB reserve changes on DAC unlocking and DAC amortization is taken into consideration in the model. It is important to understand that the actual effect on fee income of market changes in the current quarter of an equity market change and the effect in the immediately following quarter will not be equal to a pro-rata 25% of the estimated annualized effect of the market change. This is due to the fact that the actual change in fee income in the immediate quarter during which the market changes is measured by the change in actual variable account values from the beginning of the quarter compared to the average balance of variable account values for the quarter. The change in fee income due to the change from average account values to ending account values does not occur in the immediate quarter of the market change; rather, that change in fee income will occur in the quarter following the market change. LNC estimates that this lagging effect for the second quarter of 2003 equity markets change will create an increase of $2.2 million in the third quarter of 2003 for the Lincoln Retirement segment, because average account values for the second quarter of 2003 were less than the level of ending account values at June 30, 2003. LNC also uses the S&P 500 index when describing the general effects of changes in equity markets for the Life Insurance segment. For the Lincoln UK segment, the FTSE 100 index provides a reasonable measure for approximating the effect of equity markets performance on earnings. LNC estimates that the lagging effect for the second quarter of 2003 equity markets change will create an increase of $0.1 million in fee income for Lincoln UK in the third quarter of 2003, because average account values for the second quarter of 2003 were less than the level of ending account values at June 30, 2003. Additional market indices are used in measuring the effects of the market on the results of LNC's Investment Management segment. All of the relevant equity market indices (S&P, NASDAQ and MSCI EAFE) increased during the second quarter of 2003, ranging from a 14.9% increase in the S&P 500 to a 21.0% NASDAQ increase. The ongoing effect of the second quarter equity markets change is expected to be a $0.6 million increase in the third quarter of 2003 fee income. Illustrative Scenarios The following discussion concerning the estimated effects of ongoing equity market volatility on LNC's earnings is intended to be illustrative. Actual effects may vary depending on a variety of factors, many of which are outside of LNC's control, such as changing customer behaviors that might result in changes in the mix of LNC's business between variable or fixed annuity contracts, switching between investment alternatives available within variable products, or changes in policy lapsation rates. The relative effects shown in the illustrative scenarios presented below should not be considered to be indicative of the proportional effects on earnings that more significant changes in equity markets may generate. Such non-proportional effects include those discussed earlier, such as incurred GMDB costs and DAC unlocking. Since the effects of continued equity market volatility are complex and subject to a variety of estimates and assumptions, such as assumed rates of long-term equity market performance, it is difficult to provide information that can be reliably applied to predict earnings effects over a broad range of equity markets performance alternatives. But in an effort to provide some insight into these matters, LNC has provided below illustrative examples of the effects that equity market volatility might be expected to have on LNC's earnings. The underlying assumptions regarding these illustrations are as follows: 1) The first scenario assumes that equity markets remain unchanged from their respective levels at June 30, 2003 through the third quarter of 2003. 2) The second scenario assumes that from June 30, 2003 through the end of the third quarter of 2003 equity markets increase smoothly by 2.5%. 3) The third scenario assumes that from June 30, 2003 through the end of the third quarter of 2003 equity markets decline smoothly by 2.5%. As the above assumptions indicate, actual equity market changes that may have occurred since June 30, 2003 up to the date of issuance of this guidance are not being considered; rather, the examples that follow are provided to illustrate the effects of a hypothetical change in equity markets from June 30, 2003. The following tables are examples of the estimated effects on earnings that might be expected for each of these scenarios. Scenario #1: No change in equity markets from June 30, 2003 through September 30, 2003. Estimated After-tax Effect on Third Quarter of 2003 Results (in millions): <TABLE> <CAPTION> Segment --------------------------------------------- Lincoln Life Investment Retirement Insurance Management Lincoln UK LNC Total --------------------------------------------------------- <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> Fees- Lagging Effect of 2Q03 Market Changes on 3Q03* $2.2 $-- $0.6 $0.1 $2.9 Fees- Current Effects in Third Quarter -- -- -- -- -- --------------------------------------------------------- Total Fee Income 2.2 -- 0.6 0.1 2.9 Other (0.3) -- -- -- (0.3) GMDB-No Change Effect (3.6) -- -- -- (3.6) GMDB-Market Change Effect -- -- -- -- -- --------------------------------------------------------- Total GMDB (3.6) -- -- -- (3.6) DAC/DFEL** -- (0.3) -- (0.8) (1.1) --------------------------------------------------------- Total Effect $(1.7) $(0.3) $0.6 $(0.7) $(2.1) </TABLE> * Differences exist in the market change effect on fee income for the current quarter, as compared to the ongoing quarterly effect, because the change in fee income in the immediate quarter is determined by the change in beginning variable account balances to average variable account balances for the current quarter. The change in fee income in the next subsequent quarter is determined by the change in average account values to ending variable account values that occurred due to the market changing in the preceding quarter. However, in all following quarters, the ongoing effect of changes in the market occurring in the current quarter will be determined by the difference in beginning of quarter to end of quarter variable account balances. For purposes of this guidance, the change in account values is assumed to correlate with the change in the relevant index. ** This amount includes the impact on DAC, DFEL and PVIF for the Life Insurance and Lincoln UK segments. Scenario #2: 2.5% increase in equity markets from June 30, 2003 to September 30, 2003 occurs smoothly during the quarter. Estimated After-tax Effect on Third Quarter of 2003 Results (in millions): <TABLE> <CAPTION> Segment --------------------------------------------- Lincoln Life Investment Retirement Insurance Management Lincoln UK LNC Total --------------------------------------------------------- <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> Fees- Lagging Effect of 2Q03 Market Changes on 3Q03* $2.2 $-- $0.6 $0.1 $2.9 Fees- Current Effects in Third Quarter 0.7 -- 0.4 0.1 1.2 --------------------------------------------------------- Total Fee Income 2.9 -- 1.0 0.2 4.1 Other -- -- -- -- -- GMDB-No Change Effect (3.6) -- -- -- (3.6) GMDB-Market Change Effect 3.0 -- -- -- 3.0 --------------------------------------------------------- Total GMDB (0.6) -- -- -- (0.6) DAC/DFEL** -- -- -- 0.1 0.1 --------------------------------------------------------- Total Effect $2.3 $-- $1.0 $0.3 $3.6 </TABLE> * See * under Scenario #1 for explanation. ** See ** under Scenario #1 for explanation. Scenario #3: 2.5% decline in equity markets from June 30, 2003 to September 30, 2003 occurs smoothly during the quarter. Estimated After-tax Effect on Third Quarter of 2003 Results (in millions): <TABLE> <CAPTION> Segment --------------------------------------------- Lincoln Life Investment Retirement Insurance Management Lincoln UK LNC Total --------------------------------------------------------- <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> Fees- Lagging Effect of 2Q03 Market Changes on 3Q03* $2.2 $-- $0.6 $0.1 $2.9 Fees- Current Effects in Third Quarter (0.7) -- (0.4) (0.1) (1.2) --------------------------------------------------------- Total Fee Income 1.5 -- 0.2 -- 1.7 Other (0.6) -- -- -- (0.6) GMDB-No Change Effect (3.6) -- -- -- (3.6) GMDB-Market Change Effect (3.5) -- -- -- (3.5) --------------------------------------------------------- Total GMDB (7.1) -- -- -- (7.1) DAC/DFEL** (1.4) (0.5) -- (1.7) (3.6) --------------------------------------------------------- Total Effect $(7.6) $(0.5) $0.2 $(1.7) $(9.6) </TABLE> * See * under Scenario #1 for explanation. ** See ** under Scenario #1 for explanation. Estimated Effect of Each One-Percent Change in Equity Markets The above examples are based upon the estimated annual after-tax effect on earnings for each one-percentage point change in relevant equity market indices. Taking one-fourth of this annual estimate will generate the expected effect of the equity market change on quarterly results, with the exception of DAC unlocking and GMDB incurred cost calculations where the effect is fully reflected in one quarter. The estimated annual effect in millions of dollars per one-percentage change and the changes in each of the relevant market indices used in the above examples, are listed in the following table. <TABLE> <CAPTION> 2.50% increase 2.50% decline No Change in Third in Third Segment and Effect* Relevant Measure in Market Quarter 2003 Quarter 2003 - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> Lincoln Retirement - Ave Daily Change in Fee Income S&P 500 $0.0 M x 0.0 $2.2 M x 1.25 $2.2 M x (1.25) - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Lincoln Retirement - Actual Change in Other Items S&P 500 vs. Expected $0.5 M x (2.25) $0.5 M x 0.25 $0.5 M x (4.75) - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Lincoln Retirement - Actual Change in GMDB Incurred Costs S&P 500 ($3.6M) ($3.6M)+ $1.2M x 2.5 ($3.6M) + $1.4 M x (2.5) - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Lincoln Retirement - Actual Change in DAC/DFEL S&P 500 vs. Expected $0.0 M* x (2.25) $0.1 M x 0.25 $0.3 M x (4.75) - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Life Insurance - Actual Change in DAC/DFEL/PVIF S&P 500 vs. Expected $0.11 M x (2.25) $0.11 M x 0.25 $0.11 M x (4.75) - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Investment Management - Blend of Fee Income Market Indices $0.6 M x 0.0 $0.6 M x 2.5 $0.6 M x (2.5) - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Investment Management - Blend of DAC** Market Indices $0.0 M x (2.25) $0.0 M x 0.25 $0.0 M x (4.75) - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Lincoln UK - Ave Daily Change Fee Income in FTSE 100 $0.2 M x 0.0 $0.2 M x 1.25 $0.2 M x (1.25) - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Lincoln UK - Actual Change in FTSE DAC/DFEL/PVIF 100 vs. Expected Change $0.35 M x (2.25) $0.35 M x 0.25 $0.35 M x (4.75) - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- </TABLE> * The factor for no change in market for Lincoln Retirement DAC is $0.0 M. This is because the GMDB reserve adjustment results in an increase or decrease to actual gross profits and therefore has an inverse impact on DAC amortization. The interplay of GMDB reserve changes on DAC unlocking and DAC amortization is taken into consideration in the model. ** The factors for a 1% change in the equity markets for the Investment Management segment DAC are noted as approximately $0.0 M on the above chart. This is because the trigger points for unlocking are beyond the percentage changes noted in the above scenarios. The trigger point for negative DAC unlocking in the third quarter of 2003 is an approximate 22% decline in the equity markets and the trigger point for positive unlocking in the third quarter is an approximate 24% increase in the equity markets. Sensitivity Factors for Retirement Segment As the above table indicates, the annual effect of a one percent change in equity markets varies depending upon the severity of the change. Presented below are estimated one million dollar effects for various market changes that are currently used by LNC in modeling the Lincoln Retirement segment. These estimated effects are subject to ongoing modification, as they are particularly sensitive to the mix of business and to the actual level of variable account balances. The following table provides the annual after-tax effect for changes in equity markets for the Lincoln Retirement segment related to fee income and other: <TABLE> <CAPTION> ($ Millions for each 1% Change in Relevant Market Index) - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 20% + 11 - 20% 6 - 10% 1 to 5% No 1 to 5% 6 - 10% 10%+ Decline Decline Decline Decline Change Increase Increase - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> Fee Income (1.8) (2.0) (2.1) (2.2) -- 2.2 2.3 2.4 Other (0.5) (0.5) (0.5) (0.5) -- 0.5 0.5 0.5 - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- </TABLE> The estimated annual effects indicated in the table above are applicable for the third quarter of 2003. For example, assume an estimate is being computed for the quarterly effect on Lincoln Retirement fee income due to a 2.5% increase in the markets occurring in the third quarter of 2003. In this example, the expected quarterly effect of a third quarter 2.5% increase is estimated as: ($2.2 x 1.25/4) = $0.69 million. The table provided below contains information for use in estimating the third quarter 2003 after-tax effect for changes in equity markets for the Lincoln Retirement segment related to GMDB and DAC. For GMDB, quarterly results will include a reserve adjustment. This is due to the fact that LNC has established the GMDB reserves net of anticipated future GMDB fee revenues. As a result, an adjustment will be required to increase GMDB reserves during periods where a GMDB Net Amount At Risk exists. Based upon the Net Amount At Risk for GMDB at June 30, 2003, the third quarter 2003 GMDB reserve adjustment is estimated at $3.6 million (included in the no change column in the table below). <TABLE> <CAPTION> ($ Millions for each 1% Change in Relevant Market Index) - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 20% + 11 - 20% 6 - 10% 1 to 5% No 1 to 5% 6 - 10% 10%+ Decline Decline Decline Decline Change Increase Increase - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> GMDB (2.2) (1.7) (1.5) (1.4) (3.6) 1.2 1.2 1.2 DAC (1.0) (0.6) (0.5) (0.3) -- 0.1 0.1 0.2 - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- </TABLE> The estimated quarterly effects indicated in the table above are applicable for the third quarter of 2003. For example, assume an estimate is being computed for the quarterly effect on Lincoln Retirement's GMDB reserve due to a 2.5% increase in the equity markets occurring in the third quarter of 2003. The estimated quarterly effect is calculated as follows: $(3.6) + $1.2 x 2.5 = $(0.6) million. Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities. In June 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 146, "Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities" ("FAS 146"), which addresses financial accounting and reporting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities and nullifies Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 94-3, "Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring)" ("Issue 94-3"). The principal difference between FAS 146 and Issue 94-3 is that FAS 146 requires that a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized when the liability is incurred, rather than at the date of an entity's commitment to an exit plan. FAS 146 is effective for exit or disposal activities after December 31, 2002. LNC adopted FAS 146 on January 1, 2003 and the adoption of the Statement affects the timing of when an expense is recognized for restructuring activities. Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. On December 31, 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation- Transition and Disclosure" ("FAS 148"), which provides alternative methods of transition for entities that change to the fair value method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. The three transition methods provided under FAS 148 are the prospective, the modified prospective and the retroactive restatement methods. LNC adopted the retroactive restatement method, which requires that companies restate all periods presented to reflect stock-based employee compensation cost under the fair value accounting method in FAS 123 for all employee awards granted, modified or settled in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 1994. LNC adopted the fair value method of accounting under FAS 123, as amended by FAS 148, as of January 1, 2003 and has restated financial statements for the years 2002 and 2001. Effective January 1, 2003, under LNC's Incentive Compensation Plan, LNC's employee stock option compensation program and long-term cash incentive compensation program were revised and combined to provide for performance vesting, and to provide for awards that may be paid out in a combination of stock options, performance shares of LNC stock and cash. The performance measures for the initial grant under the new plan will be calculated over a three-year period from grant date and will compare LNC's performance relative to a selected group of peer companies. Comparative performance measures will include relative growth in earnings per share, return on equity and total share performance. Certain participants in the new plans selected from seven different combinations of stock options, performance shares and cash in determining the form of their award. Other participants will have their award paid in performance shares. This plan replaces the current LNC stock option plan; however, the separate stock option incentive programs established by Delaware Investments U.S., Inc. ("DIUS") and DIAL Holding Company, Inc. ("DIAL"), both wholly-owned subsidiaries of Delaware Management Holdings, Inc., will continue. The following table provides the impact of the restatement for stock-based compensation for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001. For the effect of the restatement on the six and three months ended June 30, 2002, refer to Note 2 to the June 30, 2003 unaudited consolidated financial statements and the discussion of results of operations for each business segment. After-tax effect of the retroactive adoption of FAS 123 fair value method of accounting for stock options on previously reported Net Income for LNC's segments: Year Ended December 31, (in millions) 2002 2001 ------------------------------- Lincoln Retirement $(4.1) $(4.1) Life Insurance (2.9) (3.8) Investment Management (27.1) (20.7) Lincoln UK (2.3) (2.1) Other Operations (6.4) (13.9) ------- ------- Total $(42.8) $(44.6) ======= ======= Accounting for Variable Interest Entities. In January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Interpretation No. 46, "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities" ("Interpretation 46"), which requires the consolidation of variable interest entities ("VIE") by an enterprise if that enterprise has a variable interest that will absorb a majority of the VIE's expected losses if they occur, receive a majority of the entity's expected residual returns if they occur, or both. If one enterprise will absorb a majority of a VIE's expected losses and another enterprise will receive a majority of that VIE's expected residual returns, the enterprise absorbing a majority of the losses shall consolidate the VIE. VIE refers to an entity in which equity investors do not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties. This Interpretation applies in the third quarter of 2003 to VIEs in which an enterprise holds a variable interest that is acquired before February 1, 2003. LNC intends to adopt this Interpretation prospectively with a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the beginning of the third quarter of 2003. As key guidance with respect to certain aspects of the new Interpretation is still emerging, LNC has not been able to finalize the expected effect of adoption. Among the matters that LNC is currently reviewing in connection with the third quarter 2003 effective date of Interpretation No. 46 to existing VIEs is the potential application to Collateralized Debt Obligation (CDO) pools that are managed by LNC. Because the fees earned by LNC for managing these CDOs are required to be included in the analysis of expected residual returns, it is likely that such CDO pools may fall under the consolidation requirements of Interpretation No. 46. If the invested assets within the CDO pools and the liabilities owed by the CDO pools to the third party investors are required to be brought onto LNC's consolidated balance sheet, LNC would disclose that the CDO pool liabilities are nonrecourse to LNC. Because the fair value of the underlying invested assets in the CDO pools is currently below amortized cost basis, if LNC is required to consolidate the CDO pools, the value of the assets recorded upon initial adoption of the new Interpretation will be less than the amount of nonrecourse debt. Based upon information currently available, LNC estimates that the fair value of the CDO pool assets is about $1.2 billion and that the nonrecourse debt would be recorded at about $1.5 billion. LNC has an investment of about $22.5 million in certain of the CDO pools that it manages; at June 30, 2003 these investments had a fair value of $21.5 million. So LNC does not bear the economic risk of the loss represented by the approximate $300 million difference between the value of all of the CDO pool assets and the total amount of CDO pool nonrecourse debt. Yet under this emerging guidance, at the time of adopting these new rules LNC's financial statements would not reflect the fact that it is the third party investor group, and not LNC, that bears the economic risk of these losses. To record the difference between the value of the CDO pool assets and the CDO pool nonrecourse debt on LNC's balance sheet upon the adoption of Interpretation 46, LNC would record a charge to equity through Other Comprehensive Income for the cumulative temporary declines in underlying investment asset values and LNC would record a charge to net income equal to the declines in value of the underlying investment assets that are considered other than temporary. While LNC has not been able to complete the analysis of all of the underlying investment assets held within these CDO pools in order to determine which of these investments have experienced declines in fair value that are other than temporary, based upon the analysis completed to date it appears likely that 50% or more of the cumulative declines in the fair value of the CDO pool assets may be determined to be other than temporary. In subsequent periods, when the underlying invested assets are sold and the proceeds are distributed to the investors, LNC would record gains associated with the extinguishment of nonrecourse debt. This reversal of the losses recorded upon the initial adoption of Interpretation 46 as the CDO pools liquidate reflects the fact that it is the third party investors, and not LNC, that ultimatley bears the risk of loss from these CDO pools. The Financial Accounting Standards Board is still considering important guidance relating to these types of investment pools. Until final guidance is issued, LNC is unable to finalize its review of these matters. In addition, LNC does not currently have access to all information necessary to determine the ultimate effects of such a required consolidation, because LNC is not the trustee or the administrator of the CDO pools. Accordingly, the estimated effects of the adoption of Interpretation 46 that are discussed in the preceding paragraphs are subject to change, pending the issuance of final guidance by the FASB and LNC's obtaining the necessary information from the CDO pool trustees and administrators. Since LNC's role of investment manager for the CDO pools does not expose LNC to risk of loss on the underlying invested assets, LNC management does not believe the accounting model imposed under Interpretation 46 is reflective of the true underlying economics for the investment manager of these types of CDO pool arrangements. However, based upon the current status of this emerging guidance, it appears that LNC may be required to apply this accounting model in order to comply with generally accepted accounting principles. Although LNC and the industry continue to review the new rules, at the present time LNC does not believe there are other significant VIEs that would result in consolidation with LNC, beyond the managed CDO pools discussed above. Accounting for Modified Coinsurance. In April 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board's ("FASB") Derivative Implementation Group issued Statement 133 Implementation Issue No. B36 ("DIG B36") addressing the accounting for modified coinsurance agreements ("Modco") and coinsurance with funds withheld ("CFW") reinsurance agreements. This implementation guidance concluded that Modco and CFW agreements contain embedded derivatives that must be accounted for separately from the underlying reinsurance agreements. In conjunction with the initial application of these new rules, companies that have ceded business and are holding invested assets under these types of reinsurance arrangements may reclassify available for sale invested assets to trading account classification, where such securities relate to the embedded derivatives in the reinsurance agreements. The effective date for implementation of DIG B36 for LNC will be the October 1, 2003 start date of the fourth quarter. Upon adoption, LNC will record the fair value of the applicable embedded derivatives in net income as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle. The new rules do not provide guidance with respect to a number of key implementation matters, presenting LNC and the life insurance industry with several challenging decisions and numerous alterative interpretations as to the application of the new rules. Accordingly, LNC is currently evaluating alternative interpretations, as well as potential changes in its reinsurance agreements, that could affect the amounts recorded at the time of adoption as well as the way changes in the fair values of invested assets and embedded derivatives associated with these reinsurance agreements will be reflected within LNC's financial statements on an ongoing basis. Among the matters LNC is currently evaluating is how to characterize the embedded derivatives in various Modco and CFW reinsurance agreements. Alternatives under consideration include viewing the embedded derivatives as total return swaps or credit default swaps. Once the characterizations of the various embedded derivatives are decided upon, LNC must then determine what methodologies to use to measure the fair value of the embedded derivatives. For instance, if LNC determines that characterization of an embedded derivative as a total return swap is appropriate for a particular agreement, LNC might look to the unrealized gains and losses included within the invested assets supporting the agreement as a means of measuring the fair value of the embedded derivative. In such circumstances, upon adoption of the new rules LNC may decide to reclassify that portion of the underlying invested assets that are currently classified as available for sale securities to trading account assets. To illustrate the potential effect that the initial adoption of these rules could have on LNC's financial statements, information relating to invested assets held by LNC at June 30, 2003 under Modco and CFW agreements is provided below. The actual effect of adoption will vary depending upon a number of factors, such as how the embedded derivatives are characterized, the valuation methodologies selected, whether the terms of the reinsurance agreements provide for a pass through of the total return of an identified investment portfolio or some other measure, whether or not invested assets within such reinsurance investment portfolios are reclassified from available for sale to trading account, the amount of unrealized gains or losses of the relevant invested assets at the adoption date, and any changes in the terms or structure of a large number of existing LNC Modco and CFW reinsurance agreements. At June 30, 2003, the fair value of LNC invested assets associated with Modco and CFW agreements totaled about $3.3 billion. The net unrealized pre-tax gain associated with these assets at June 30, 2003 was about $481 million. Included within that total net gain is about $450 million of net gain related to available for sale securities and $31 million of net gain related to other invested assets. If LNC should determine that the best characterization of the embedded derivatives associated with these various agreements is that of total return swaps, and if LNC determines that the unrealized gains and losses of the underlying invested asset portfolios can be used to measure the value of the embedded derivative, and provided further that there were no changes in the value of the underlying investment portfolios and that there are no changes in the reinsurance agreements between June 30, 2003 and October 1, 2003, then LNC would record a $481 million pre-tax loss in net income upon the initial adoption of the new rules to record the various embedded derivatives. LNC would also record a pre-tax increase in equity of $450 million to reverse the "shadow adjustment" entries previously recorded through Other Comprehensive Income. The shadow adjustments were previously recorded due to the fact that unrealized gains or losses on the reinsurance portfolios generally inure to the benefit or detriment of the assuming reinsurance company. The $31 million pretax net effect on LNC's equity of the initial adoption adjustments would reverse over the term of the reinsurance agreements, as the net unrealized gains associated with invested assets that are not classified as available-for-sale securities are realized in future periods. If LNC decided to concurrently reclassify all relevant available-for-sale invested assets to trading account assets upon the initial adoption of these new rules, LNC would record a pre-tax gain in net income of $450 million. However, LNC's equity would not be affected by this reclassification accounting, as the previously recorded increases to shareholder's equity booked in Other Comprehensive Income as a result of the available-for-sale classification of these investments would be reversed upon the reclassification of these invested assets from available-for-sale to trading account. On an ongoing basis, changes in the fair value of the embedded derivative would flow through net income, as would changes in the fair value of trading account assets. Changes in the fair value of other invested assets supporting these agreements would flow through net income as unrealized gains or losses on these assets are realized. Because the recognition of the fair value of embedded derivatives does not affect either the cash flows or the economic profits to be recognized over the life of the reinsurance agreement, it is expected that these new rules will only change the pattern of earnings associated with these reinsurance agreements. Importantly, it is expected that the new rules will not change the ultimate profit or loss that will be reported over the entire term of the reinsurance agreement. Not included in the above discussion are a number of reinsurance agreements where LNC accepts business as a reinsurer on a Modco basis and then cedes the business off on a Modco basis to Swiss Re. LNC does not hold the underlying invested assets under these agreements, and LNC has effectively transferred all underwriting and investment risks associated with these agreements. LNC is a party to a number of such reinsurance agreements, which at June 30, 2003 aggregated about $1.8 billion of business. While LNC continues to review the treatment of these Modco agreements under these new rules, it appears that the embedded derivatives associated with these agreements will be characterized as total return swaps. Based upon information available at this time and the preliminary conclusion that these embedded derivatives should be characterized as total return swaps, LNC expects that its position as an accepting reinsurer and a ceding company on the same business should result in equal and offsetting changes in the value of the embedded derivatives associated with these agreements. Accordingly, LNC would not expect that the embedded derivatives associated with these reinsurance agreements would create significant volatility in reported net income in future periods. In addition, LNC has acquired certain blocks of variable annuity and life business using Modco reinsurance structures. At June 30, 2003 there was about $336 million of business acquired in this manner. LNC continues to review whether the accounting for these agreements will change under the new rules; based upon information available at this time LNC does not believe there will be any new effects on net income created by the adoption of the new embedded derivative accounting rules for these agreements, given the fact that the assets and liabilities associated with these variable blocks of business are already reflected at fair value within LNC's financial statements. Restructuring Charges In June 2003, LNC announced the realignment of its life insurance and annuity businesses into a single operating unit focused on providing wealth accumulation and protection; income distribution and wealth transfer products. On August 4, 2003, LNC announced that in addition to the previously announced realignment of LNC's life and annuity businesses it is taking further action to position LNC for future growth. The actions are expected to impact all domestic operations. In total, the planned actions, including the previously announced realignments, are expected to result in pre-tax savings of $25 million in 2003, $80 million in 2004 and $105 million in 2005. Offsetting these savings are related pre-tax charges estimated to be $135 million which are expected to occur over a three year period, with an estimated $95 million in 2003, $30 million in 2004 and $10 million in 2005. Also, offsetting the savings are pre-tax investments in business growth initiatives of which $15 million are expected to be recognized in 2003, $30 million in 2004 and $35 million in 2005. The after-tax impact to net income from the investments in business growth initiatives, expense savings and charges is estimated to result in a net charge of $55 million in 2003, net savings of $13 million in 2004 and net savings of $39 million in 2005. The number of job eliminations is expected to range between 800 and 1,000, including approximately 200 which have occurred during 2003. For an update on the status of restructuring plans implemented from 1999 through June 30, 2003, refer to Note 9 to the June 30, 2003 unaudited consolidated financial statements. RESULTS OF OPERATIONS BY SEGMENT Lincoln Retirement Results of Operations <TABLE> <CAPTION> Six Months Ended Three Months Ended June 30, June 30, 2003 2002 2003 2002 - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> Net Income (in millions) $88.6 $55.7 $81.7 $9.2 Items Included in Net Income: Realized Loss on Investments and Derivative Instruments (after-tax) $(50.9) $(69.4) $(0.4) $(36.5) Restructuring Charge (4.0) (1.0) (4.0) (1.0) Average Daily Variable Account Values (in billions) $29.2 $33.5 <CAPTION> June 30 (in billions) 2003 2002 - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- <S> <C> <C> Account Values Variable Annuities $30.5 $31.2 Fixed Annuities $20.9 $18.7 Reinsurance Ceded (2.2) (1.8) ------ ------ Total Fixed Annuities $18.7 $16.9 Total Account Values $49.2 $48.1 </TABLE> Net income increased $32.9 million and $72.5 million for the six and three months ended June 30, 2003, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2002. Stock-Based Compensation The periods presented for 2002 have been restated for the adoption of FAS 123 and FAS 148. See the discussion under the topic "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation" presented in the Consolidated Results of Operations for further discussion of this matter. The effect of adoption was a decrease of $2.1 million and $1.0 million in net income in the six and three months ended June 30, 2002, respectively, from previously reported amounts. Realized Losses on Investments and Derivative Instruments Realized losses on investments and derivative instruments for the Lincoln Retirement segment decreased $18.5 million and $36.1 million for the six and three months ended June 30, 2003, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2002. For additional detail on realized losses see the discussion in the Consolidated Investments section. Equity Market Impact The improvement in the equity markets favorably affected the segment's earnings through positive unlocking of deferred acquisition costs ("DAC") and the present value of in-force intangible ("PVIF"), a decrease in reserves and benefit payments for guaranteed minimum death benefits ("GMDB"), partially offset by lower fees resulting from lower average variable account values compared to the first six months of 2002. The increase in the equity markets positively affected earnings by $11.4 million in the six months ended June 30, 2003 and $35.9 million in the three months ended June 30, 2003 compared to the same periods in 2002. Average variable annuity account values were $5.9 billion and $4.3 billion lower for the six months and three months ended June 30, 2003 compared to the same periods in 2002, resulting in a reduction of fees, lowering earnings by $21.1 million and $7.4 million, respectively. The effect of equity market impact on DAC and PVIF unlocking and net changes in amortization increased earnings by $18.8 million and $18.6 million in the six months and three months ended June 30, 2003, respectively, compared to the same periods of 2002. Decreases in GMDB reserves and benefit payments resulted in a positive variance of $10.0 million and $21.0 million for the six and three months ended June 30, 2003, respectively, compared to 2002 periods. (See the section captioned "Critical Accounting Policy - Guaranteed Minimum Death Benefit Reserving for additional details.) In addition, there was a positive variance of $3.7 million for the six and three month 2003 periods related Lincoln Retirement's Separate Account Dividends Received Deduction ("DRD") tax benefit. Refer to the Third Quarter 2003 Guidance for Estimated Effect of Equity Market Volatility section for estimates of the effect of movements in the equity markets on Lincoln Retirement's earnings. Investment Margins Investment margins on fixed annuities were $7.0 million and $3.3 million higher in the six and three months ended June 30, 2003, respectively, compared to the same periods of 2002. The increase in margins was a result a reduction in crediting rates. (See further discussion on investment margins and the interest rate risk due to falling interest rates in Item 3, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.) Included in the investment margins variance were earnings from investment partnerships. The returns on the investment partnerships were below expected levels by $1.5 million and $2.0 million, respectively for the six and three months ended June 30, 2003 compared to the same periods of 2002. Net Flows - Fixed Annuities Average gross fixed annuity account values for the six months and three months ended June 30, 2003 were $2.3 billion higher than the same periods in 2002. This increase contributed additional earnings of $11.5 million and $6.0 million in the first six months and second quarter of 2003 compared to the same periods in 2002. The increase in fixed annuity account values was due to the positive net flows for fixed annuities. (See below for further discussion of net flows.) Restructuring Charges During the second quarter of 2003, the Lincoln Retirement segment completed the consolidation of its fixed annuity operations in Schaumburg, Illinois into Fort Wayne, Indiana. This resulted in expenses of $2.1 million in the second quarter of 2003. In addition, the Lincoln Retirement segment recognized $1.9 million of expenses in the second quarter of 2003 related to the combining of the Lincoln Retirement and Life Insurance operations announced in June of 2003. For further details refer to Note 9 to the June 30, 2003 unaudited consolidated financial statements. Critical Accounting Policy - Deferred Acquisition Costs Refer to Management's Discussion and Analysis of LNC's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, for a detailed discussion of this critical accounting policy. At June 30, 2003, Lincoln Retirement's reversion to the mean gross growth rate assumption for the equity markets was 6.9%, which compares to the assumption of 9% at December 31, 2002. The decrease in the growth rate was due to the increase in the equity markets in the second quarter of 2003. During the third quarter of 2003, the Lincoln Retirement segment expects to perform a comprehensive review of the assumptions underlying the amortization of the DAC asset. The review will encompass the fundamental assumptions including lapses, mortality, expenses, reinsurance and investment margins. Critical Accounting Policy - Guarantee Minimum Death Benefit Reserving Refer to Management's Discussion and Analysis of LNC's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, for a detailed discussion of this critical accounting policy. At June 30, 2003, Lincoln Retirement's net amount at risk ("NAR") was $3.0 billion and the GAAP reserve was $70.9 million. The reserve for statutory accounting was $90.7 million. The comparable amounts at December 31, 2002 were a NAR of $4.6 billion, GAAP reserve of $84.5 million and statutory reserve of $144.1 million. See the table below for additional statistics related to GMDB as of June 30, 2003: <TABLE> <CAPTION> Return of High Water Premium Mark Roll-Up No GMDB Total --------- ---------- ------- -------- -------- <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> Variable Annuity Account Value (billions) $22.6 $10.5 $0.3 $6.9 $40.3 % of Total Annuity Account Value 56.0% 26.0% 0.7% 17.3% 100.0% Average Account Value $32,461 $64,805 $98,566 $47,832 $41,392 Average NAR $7,992 $8,387 $16,254 N/A $8,167 GAAP Reserve (millions) $21.9 $48.5 $0.5 N/A $70.9 NAR (billions) $2.0 $1.0 $0.0 N/A $3.0 Average Age of Contract Holder 51 61 63 58 54 % of Contract Holders > 70 Years of Age 9.4% 25.5% 29.7% 21.3% 14.1% </TABLE> As described in LNC's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, LNC has variable annuity contracts containing GMDB's which have a dollar for dollar withdrawal feature. As of June 30, 2003, there were 503 contracts for which the death benefit to account value ratio was greater than ten to one. The NAR on these contracts was $34.7 million. Effective May of 2003, the GMDB feature offered on new sales will be a pro-rata GMDB feature whereby each dollar of withdrawal will reduce the GMDB benefit in proportion to the current GMDB to account value ratio. The IRS recently issued guidance permitting tax-free treatment for partial exchanges of non-qualified contracts. LNC has not previously allowed partial withdrawals on non-qualified contracts. In light of this new IRS guidance, LNC is considering changing its administrative procedures to permit partial withdrawals. If LNC decides to allow partial exchanges, LNC would treat a partial exchange as a tax-free partial surrender of a pro rata portion of the contract. The proportionate share of the contract value, contract holder's investment, death benefit and surrender charges would be allocated to the portion of the contract being surrendered. The pro rata amount of gain on the contract would not be reported as taxable income to the contract holder as it would be considered reinvested in a tax-free exchange for a new contract. However, to take advantage of the dollar for dollar feature discussed earlier, the contract holder must take a taxable withdrawal, and pay any applicable surrender charges. Such withdrawals would not qualify for tax-free partial exchange treatment. LNC reports the appropriate amount of withdrawals as taxable income to the IRS, as well as indicating whether or not tax penalties apply under the premature distribution rules. <TABLE> <CAPTION> Net Flows Six Months Ended Three Months Ended June 30, June 30, - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (in billions) 2003 2002 2003 2002 - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> Variable Portion of Annuity Deposits $1.2 $1.6 $0.6 $0.8 Variable Portion of Annuity Withdrawals (1.5) (1.8) (0.8) (0.9) ------- ------- ------- ------- Variable Portion of Variable Annuity Net Flows (0.3) (0.2) (0.2) (0.1) Fixed Portion of Variable Annuity Deposits 0.9 0.8 0.4 0.4 Fixed Portion of Variable Annuity Withdrawals (0.7) (0.5) (0.2) (0.3) ------- ------- ------- ------- Fixed Portion of Variable Annuity Net Flows 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.1 Fixed Annuity Deposits 0.7 0.9 0.3 0.4 Fixed Annuity Withdrawals (0.4) (0.7) (0.2) (0.2) ------- ------- ------- ------- Fixed Annuity Net Flows 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.2 Total Annuity Net Flows $0.2 $0.3 $0.1 $0.2 Incremental Deposits (1) $2.7 $3.2 $1.3 $1.6 (1) Incremental Deposits represent gross deposits reduced by transfers from other Lincoln annuity products. </TABLE> Net Flows and Product Sales With positive net flows in the second quarter of 2003, the Lincoln Retirement segment experienced positive net flows for the eighth consecutive quarter. Net flows for the first six months and second quarter of 2003 were $116 million and $124 million lower, respectively compared to the same periods in 2002. Although gross annuity deposits were down, the Lincoln Retirement segment experienced an improvement in persistency, as evidenced by lower withdrawals. Overall gross annuity deposits declined $567 million, or 17%, and $277 million, or 17%, in the first six months and second quarter of 2003, respectively compared to the same periods in 2002. The decline occurred with sales of both individual variable and fixed annuities. American Legacy Variable Annuity gross deposits were down $313 million, or 33%, and $136 million, or 29%, while Lincoln ChoicePlusSM gross variable and fixed annuity deposits were down $93 million, or 18%, and $25 million, or 11%, for the respective six-month and three-month periods. In order to improve sales of variable annuities, in June of 2003 the Lincoln Retirement segment introduced the Lincoln Principal SecuritySM feature which provides the contractholder with a guaranteed living benefit. This new feature is in response to growing consumer demand for guarantees in variable annuity products. The feature is available for an additional fee and provides a guarantee equal to the initial purchase payment (or contract value if elected after issue) as adjusted for subsequent purchase payments and withdrawals. It also allows investors to make annual withdrawals up to the amount of their original deposit, provided each annual withdrawal is less than seven percent of the initial deposit. LNC will waive fees for this feature after year five as long as withdrawal activity has been and remains minimal and the benefit has not been reset, an innovative element in the Guaranteed Minimum Withdrawal Benefit ("GMWB") market. In order to manage the equity market risk associated with this feature, the Lincoln Retirement segment implemented a hedging strategy. In addition to the introduction of the Lincoln Principal SecuritySM feature, Lincoln Financial Distributors ("LFD") expects to add new wholesalers to market variable annuity products. These wholesalers are expected to be in place during the third quarter of 2003. The increase in wholesalers is expected to strengthen LNC's penetration in the variable annuity market. Partially offsetting the decline in individual annuities product sales was an increase in employer-sponsored annuity product sales, which were up $142 million, or 14%, in the six months ended June 30, 2003 and were flat for the second quarter of 2003 compared to the same periods in 2002. The strong sales performance in 2003 within employer-sponsored annuities is a result of increased deposits in the Alliance program. Sales of the Alliance program were $531 million in the first six months of 2003, up from $280 million in the first six months of 2002. Alliance sales are expected to moderate over the remainder of 2003 as first quarter 2003 sales of $337 million benefited from the large number of enrollments from employer-sponsored plans. Life Insurance Results of Operations <TABLE> <CAPTION> Six Months Ended Three Months Ended June 30, June 30, 2003 2002 2003 2002 - --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> Net Income $114.1 $100.2 $65.6 $56.7 Items Included in Net Income: Realized Loss on Investments and Derivative Instruments (after-tax) $(10.0) $(43.1) $(1.5) $(16.1) Restructuring Charge (after-tax) (8.3) -- (4.7) -- First Year Premiums (by Product) Universal Life $273.4 $185.3 $142.7 $98.9 Variable Universal Life 38.5 81.4 14.1 42.4 Whole Life 13.5 11.6 7.1 6.4 Term 18.8 16.8 9.6 8.1 ------- ------- ------- ------- Total Retail 344.2 295.1 173.5 155.8 Corporate Owned Life Insurance ("COLI") 72.4 53.6 61.8 46.6 ------- ------- ------- ------- Total First Year Premiums $416.6 $348.7 $235.3 $202.4 <CAPTION> June 30 (in billions) 2003 2002 - --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <S> <C> <C> Account Values Universal Life $8.6 $7.8 Variable Universal Life 1.9 1.8 Interest-Sensitive Whole Life 2.2 2.2 ------- ------- Total Life Insurance Account Values $12.7 $11.8 In Force - Face Amount Universal Life and Other $127.3 $123.7 Term Insurance 139.2 121.1 ------- ------- Total In-Force $266.5 $244.8 </TABLE> Net income increased $13.9 million, or 14%, and $8.9 million, or 16%, for the six and three months ended June 30, 2003, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2002. Stock-Based Compensation The 2002 periods have been restated for the adoption of FAS 123 and FAS 148. See the discussion under the topic "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation" presented in the Consolidated Results of Operations for further discussion of this matter. The effect of adoption was a decrease of $1.4 million and $0.7 million to net income in the six and three months ended June 30, 2002, respectively, from previously reported amounts. Realized Losses on Investments and Derivative Instruments The Life Insurance segment had an improvement of $33.1 million and $14.6 million in realized investment losses, for the six and three months ended June 30, 2003, respectively, relative to the same periods of 2002. For additional detail on realized losses see the discussion in the Consolidated Investments section. Mortality Improved mortality margin (mortality assessments less net death benefits, net of DAC unlocking) resulted in a $4.6 million increase in earnings in the six months ended June 30, 2003 and a $2.3 million increase in the three months ended June 30, 2003 over the same periods in 2002. Investment Margins Lower investment margins reduced income by $2.5 million in the six months ended June 30, 2003 compared to the same period in 2002, primarily due to lower investment yields. This unfavorable variance is primarily related to traditional whole life insurance products and corporate account investments where LNC bears the risk for falling interest rates. For the three months ended June 30, 2003 investment margins improved $0.4 million compared to the same 2002 period, as the impact of lower yields was offset by lowering credited rates to the customers of universal life and interest sensitive whole life insurance products, (except for policies which were already at their guaranteed minimum interest rate). (See discussion on investment margins and the interest rate risk due to falling interest rates in Item 3, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.) Equity Market Impact The overall positive performance of the equity markets resulted in positive DAC unlocking of $0.7 million in the six months ended June 30, 2003 and $1.3 million in the three months ended June 30, 2003 compared to negative DAC unlocking of $1.4 million for the same periods in 2002. In addition to the unlocking impact, the down markets over the last twelve months have negatively impacted the Life Insurance segment's asset-based fee revenue on variable universal life ("VUL") insurance products (less than 15% of account values are VUL). Refer to the Third Quarter 2003 Guidance for Estimated Effect of Equity Market Volatility section for estimates of the effect of movements in the equity markets on the Life Insurance segment's earnings. Critical Accounting Policy - DAC and PVIF Refer to Management's Discussion and Analysis of LNC's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, for a detailed discussion of this critical accounting policy. In 2003, the Life Insurance segment experienced negative DAC unlocking of $8.9 million and $1.0 million in the first six months and second quarter, respectively, compared to positive unlocking of $1.3 million in the same periods of 2002. The DAC unlocking in 2003 related to items other than equity market performance primarily due to an increase in face amount reductions. The increase in face amount reductions has been driven by advanced sales design and clients requesting reductions as a result of a reduced need for life insurance coverage as their wealth has declined from the weakened economy. Included in the DAC unlocking was $5.5 million related to a change in future assumptions regarding face amount reductions (i.e. prospective unlocking). In addition to the DAC unlocking, the revised face amount reduction assumptions are expected to lower future gross profits resulting in an increase in DAC amortization. In the six and three months ended June 30, 2003, there was an increase of $3.6 million and $2.0 million, respectively, in the rate of amortization of the DAC asset compared to the same periods in 2002. During the third quarter of 2003, the Life Insurance segment expects to perform a comprehensive review of the assumptions underlying the amortization of the DAC asset. The review will encompass the fundamental assumptions including lapses, mortality, expenses, reinsurance and investment margins. Restructuring Charges In the first quarter of 2003, the Life Insurance segment announced it is realigning operations in Hartford, Connecticut and Schaumburg, Illinois to enhance productivity, efficiency and scalability while positioning the segment for future growth. In the first six months of 2003, the Life Insurance segment incurred restructuring charges of $8.3 million and other realignment related expenses of $1.2 million related to the realignment activities. In the second quarter of 2003, the Life Insurance segment incurred restructuring charges of $4.7 million and other realignment related expenses of $0.7 million. For further details refer to Note 9 to the June 30, 2003 unaudited consolidated financial statements. In-force and Product Sales As measured by life insurance in-force, the Life Insurance segment increased 9% from June 30, 2002 primarily due to strong growth in term life insurance in-force (up 15%). Account values increased $904 million, or 8%, from June 30, 2002. The drivers of this increase were positive net flows, net of policyholder assessments, of approximately $299 million across all products during the twelve months ended June 30, 2003, and interest earned on the fixed products. Total sales as measured by first year premiums were up $67.8 million, or 19%, and $32.9 million, or 16%, for the six months and three months of 2003 compared to prior year periods. Sales of retail life insurance products were up $49.0 million, or 17%, in the first six months of 2003 and $17.7 million, or 11%, in the second quarter of 2003. Sales of retail life insurance products through LNC's distribution organizations were mixed as sales through LNC's financial planning organization Lincoln Financial Advisors ("LFA") were flat for in the first six months of 2003 relative to the same period in 2002 and sales through Lincoln Financial Distributors ("LFD") were up 22%. Sales for LFA were flat, while sales for LFD increased 18% for the second quarter of 2003 compared to the second quarter of 2002. Within retail, sales of universal life ("UL") insurance products improved by $88.1 million, or 48%, in the first six months of 2003, and $43.8 million, or 44%, for the second quarter of 2003 compared to prior year periods. The increase in UL products was a result of the volatile equity markets and continued movement from variable life insurance products to interest-sensitive products. In contrast to the growth in UL sales, sales of variable universal life insurance ("VUL") were down $42.9 million, or 53%, during the first six months of 2003 from the prior year period. The decrease was $28.3 million, or 67%, during the second quarter of 2003 compared to the same period of 2002. Sales of Corporate Owned Life Insurance ("COLI") were up $18.9 million, or 35%, and $15.2 million, or 33%, in the six months and three months ended June 30, 2003 compared to the same periods in 2002. Sales of COLI products consist of very large cases resulting in fluctuations in first year premium from period to period. One such case, which contributed $33.2 million of premium in the second quarter of 2003, was sold through the M-Group Financial ("M-Group") relationship. This case is subject to the modified coinsurance arrangement and as such, profits will be shared 50/50 with M-Group Life Insurance Company. Investment Management Results of Operations <TABLE> <CAPTION> Six Months Ended Three Months Ended June 30, June 30, 2003 2002 2003 2002 - --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> Total Revenue $218.5 $213.4 $116.4 106.1 Total Investment Advisory Fees (Included in Total Revenue) 143.1 145.2 74.8 72.1 Net Income $5.6 $1.3 $4.6 $(0.8) Items Included in Net Income: Realized Gain (Loss) on Investments (after-tax) $(0.2) $(1.4) $0.1 $(0.4) </TABLE> Income Statement Reclassifications In 2003, certain reclassifications have been made in the prior periods to conform to the current year presentation. As a result, Investment Advisory fees for the six and three month periods ended June 30, 2002 were increased by $7.6 million, and $3.7 million, respectively, with corresponding increases in expenses for the same periods. In addition, foreign taxes of $2.8 million and $1.1 million for the six and three months ended June 30, 2002, respectively, were reclassified from operating expenses to the federal income tax line. Net Income Net income increased $4.3 million and $5.4 million in the six and three months ended June 30, 2003, respectively, from the same periods in 2002. Realized Losses on Investments and Derivative Instruments The Investment Management segment had an improvement of $1.2 million and $0.5 million in realized investment losses, for the six and three months ended June 30, 2003, respectively, relative to the same periods of 2002. For additional detail on realized losses see the discussion in the Consolidated Investments section. Equity Market Impact Institutional and Retail assets under management increased $3.7 billion from June 30, 2002 to June 30, 2003, with $1.3 billion of the increase due to increases in the equity markets. Of this increase, $6.1 billion occurred in the second quarter of 2003. As a result, earnings for the first six months of 2003 were negatively impacted by the decrease in the equity market through March 31, 2003, but the second quarter of 2003 earnings were higher relative to the second quarter of 2002. As a result of the improved equity markets in the second quarter of 2003, this segment had higher revenues due to higher assets. However, these increased revenues in the second quarter of 2003 were partially offset by the effect of the equity market increase on variable expenses. Positive net flows of $2.4 billion over the 12 months ended June 30, 2003 partially offset the decrease in equity markets on assets under managements from June 30, 2002 through March 31, 2003. Refer to the Third Quarter 2003 Guidance for Estimated Effect of Equity Market Volatility section for estimates of the effect of movements in the equity markets on the Investment Management segment's earnings. Stock-Based Compensation The 2002 periods have been restated for the adoption of FAS 123 and FAS 148. See the discussion under the topic "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation" presented in the Consolidated Results of Operations for further discussion of this matter. The effect of adoption was a decrease of $11.8 million and $6.9 million in net income for the six and three months ended June 30, 2002, respectively, from previously reported amounts. Critical Accounting Policy - Deferred Acquisition Costs In the first quarter of 2003, the Investment Management segment implemented a new system for calculating the amortization of deferred acquisition costs consistent with the system and methodology utilized by the Lincoln Retirement and Life Insurance segments. As a result, lower DAC amortization increased earnings by $2.8 million and $1.4 million in the six and three months ended June 30, 2003, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2002. Critical Accounting Policy - Deferred Dealer Commission Asset As discussed in the Management's Discussion and Analysis section of LNC's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, the Investment Management segment has a deferred dealer commission asset relating to upfront sales commissions paid to brokers for the sale of "Class B" shares of Delaware Investments retail mutual funds. At June 30, 2003, the deferred dealer commission asset was approximately $45 million. The improvement in the equity markets during the second quarter of 2003 has significantly reduced the risk of a loss for impairment of this asset. Assets Under Management and Net Flows The Investment Management segment's assets under management were as follows: June 30 (in billions) 2003 2002 - ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Assets Under Management Regular Operations: Retail-Equity $16.9 $16.6 Retail-Fixed 8.2 7.2 ------- ------- Total Retail $25.1 $23.8 Institutional-Equity $19.6 $18.1 Institutional-Fixed 7.7 6.8 ------- ------- Total Institutional $27.3 $24.9 Insurance Assets $43.9 $38.5 ------- ------- Total Assets Under Management $96.3 $87.2 The Investment Management segment's net flows were as follows: <TABLE> <CAPTION> Six Months Ended Three Months Ended June 30, June 30, (in billions) 2003 2002 2003 2002 - --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> Retail: Equity Sales $1.5 $2.0 $0.8 $1.1 Equity Redemptions and Transfers (1.5) (1.7) (0.6) (0.9) ------- ------- ------- ------- Net Flows -- 0.3 0.2 0.2 Fixed Sales 0.9 0.5 0.5 0.3 Fixed Redemptions and Transfers (0.6) (0.6) (0.4) (0.3) ------- ------- ------- ------- Net Flows 0.3 (0.1) 0.1 -- ------- ------- ------- ------- Total Retail Net Flows $0.3 $0.2 $0.3 $0.2 Institutional: Equity Inflows $1.2 $1.2 $0.7 $0.5 Equity Withdrawals and Transfers (0.8) (1.1) (0.3) (0.6) ------- ------- ------- ------- Net Flows 0.4 0.1 0.4 (0.1) Fixed Inflows 0.7 1.5 0.1 0.7 Fixed Withdrawals and Transfers (0.5) (0.4) (0.2) (0.2) ------- ------- ------- ------- Net Flows 0.2 1.1 (0.1) 0.5 ------- ------- ------- ------- Total Institutional Net Flows $0.6 $1.2 $0.3 $0.4 Total Retail and Institutional Net Flows $0.9 $1.4 $0.6 $0.6 </TABLE> Assets Under Management and Net Flows Assets under management increased $9.1 billion to $96.3 billion at June 30, 2003 compared to June 30, 2002. The increase was primarily the result of net flows of $2.4 billion and $1.3 billion in market appreciation in Institutional and Retail assets under management. In addition, Insurance assets (i.e. primarily general account assets of LNC's insurance subsidiaries) increased $5.4 billion for the period. Institutional assets under management increased $2.4 billion as a result of positive net inflows of $1.5 billion and market appreciation of $0.9 billion. Retail assets under management increased $1.3 billion as a result of positive flows of $0.9 billion and market appreciation of $0.4 billion. The Investment Management segment's net flows remained positive in the first six months and second quarter of 2003. However, total net flows for the six-month period were down approximately $0.5 billion compared to the same period in 2002, with the entire decline resulting from lower institutional net flows. The Investment Management segment retained institutional assets as evidenced by a lower level of withdrawals and transfers between periods, but institutional sales were down $0.8 billion. The decline in the institutional sales and net flows for the first six months ending June 30, 2003 compared to the same period in 2002 was due to a large funding of $0.7 billion in March 2002. Sales in the institutional business tend to fluctuate from period to period depending upon when large institutional mandates are received. Retail sales were down $0.1 billion in the six and three month periods ended June 30, 2003 compared to the same periods in 2002. The decline in sales was concentrated within the annuities products managed by the Investment Management segment. Sales of managed account products for the first six months of 2003 were up 15% over the same period of 2002, with substantially all the increase occurring in the first quarter of 2003 compared to the first quarter of 2002. However, full year 2003 managed account sales are expected to be lower than the full year of 2002 as sales in the third and fourth quarters of 2002 were higher than the previous quarters of the year as a result of events affecting key competitors (a group departure of investment professionals from one firm and a second firm temporarily closing for new business). Investment Performance Positive investment performance has been a key driver of the improvement in net flows. On the institutional side, for the twelve months ended June 30, 2003, 6 of the 8 largest product composites met or outperformed their respective indices and these 6 composites accounted for approximately 75% of institutional assets under management. This relative performance is above the results experienced for the year ended December 31, 2002, in which 4 of the 8 largest composites outperformed their respective indices. On the retail side, for the twelve months ended June 30, 2003, 68% of the 25 largest retail funds in the Delaware Investments Family of Funds (the Delaware Investments Family of Funds does not include mutual funds managed by Delaware for certain LNC affiliates) performed in the top half of their respective Lipper universes. These 17 funds represented 70% of assets under management of the largest 25 retail funds at June 30, 2003. At June 30, 2003, of the funds rated by Lipper, Delaware had 39 of its 50 retail funds labeled as a Lipper Leader in at least one category and 20 funds were selected in multiple categories. For the Managed Accounts, 3 of the 6 largest product composites outperformed their respective indices for the one-year period ending June 30, 2003. Lincoln UK Results of Operations <TABLE> <CAPTION> Six Months Ended Three Months Ended June 30, June 30, (in millions) 2003 2002 2003 2002 - --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> Net Income $19.3 $19.5 $12.4 $9.3 Items Included in Net Income: Realized Gain (Loss) on Investments (after-tax) $-- $(0.4) $-- $3.2 <CAPTION> June 30, (in billions) 2003 2002 - --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <S> <C> <C> Unit-Linked Assets $5.5 $5.5 Individual Life Insurance In-Force $19.1 $20.4 Exchange Rate Ratio - U.S. Dollars to Pounds Sterling Average for the Period 1.618 1.464 End of Period 1.656 1.532 </TABLE> Net income for the six months ended June 30, 2003 was level compared to the same 2002 period. Net income for the three months ended June 30, 2003 increased $3.1 million compared to the three months ended June 30, 2002. Stock-Based Compensation The 2002 periods have been restated for the adoption of FAS 123 and FAS 148. See the discussion under the topic "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation" presented in the Consolidated Results of Operations for further discussion of this matter. The effect of adoption was a decrease in net income for the six and three months ended June 30, 2002 of $1.2 million and $0.6 million, respectively, from previously reported amounts. Realized Losses on Investments There were no realized investment gains or losses for the six and three months ended June 30, 2003, compared to realized investment losses of $0.4 million for the six months and realized investment gains of $3.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002. Critical Accounting Policy - Equity Market Sensitivity The FTSE 100 index at June 30, 2003 increased 2.3% from December 31, 2002 and declined 13.4% from June 30, 2002. These movements in the UK equity markets resulted in lower fee income from unit-linked accounts of $4.0 million and $1.5 million for the six month and the three month periods ended June 30, 2003, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2002. The increase in the FTSE 100 for both the six and three month periods ended June 30, 2003 resulted in positive net unlocking of $11.8 million and $14.1 million, respectively for DAC and PVIF assets and deferred front end load revenue ("DFEL") compared the same periods in 2002. Refer to the Third Quarter 2003 Guidance for Estimated Effect of Equity Market Volatility section for estimates of the effect of movements in the equity markets on the segment's earnings. Taxes The Lincoln UK segment's effective tax rate increased in the six month and three month periods ended June 30, 2003 compared to the same periods in 2002. In 2002, the effective tax rate was lower than 35% due to the existence of excess foreign tax credits from years prior to 2002. Now that the foreign tax credits have been fully utilized, the effective tax rate is expected to be approximately 35%. The performance of the equity markets could result in future changes to the Lincoln UK segment's effective tax rate. The increase in the effective tax rate reduced earnings in the six and three months ended June 30, 2003 by $8.3 million and $4.0 million, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2002. Other Operations Results of Operations <TABLE> <CAPTION> Six Months Ended Three Months Ended June 30, June 30, (in millions) 2003 2002 2003 2002 - --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> Net Income (Loss) by Source: LFA $(17.8) $(18.8) $(7.4) $(8.7) LFD (18.8) (14.2) (10.7) (7.6) LNC Financing (29.7) (18.4) (14.4) (10.2) Other Corporate (0.5) (1.0) (0.9) 3.2 Amortization of Deferred Gain on Indemnity Reinsurance 23.8 30.0 11.9 14.4 Reserve Development on Business Sold Through Indemnity Reinsurance and Related Amortization of Deferred Gain (0.2) (14.4) (0.1) (14.4) Realized Loss on Investments and Derivatives (0.1) (5.7) -- (2.5) ------- ------- ------- ------- Net Loss $(43.3) $(42.5) $(21.6) $(25.8) </TABLE> The net loss reported within Other Operations for the six and three months ended June 30, 2003 increased $0.7 million and decreased $4.2 million, respectively, compared to same periods of 2002. The primary reasons behind the increased losses in 2003 amounts are described below. Stock-Based Compensation The 2002 periods have been restated for the adoption of FAS 123 and FAS 148. See the discussion under the topic "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation" presented in the Consolidated Results of Operations for further discussion of this matter. The effect of adoption was a decrease in net income of $1.9 million for LFA and $0.7 million for LFD in the first six months of 2002 and a decrease in net income of $1.0 million for LFA and $0.3 million for LFD in the second quarter of 2002 from previously reported amounts. Lincoln Financial Advisors ("LFA") LFA net losses for the six and three months ended June 30, 2003 decreased $1.0 million and $1.3 million, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2002. LFA's net revenues (gross revenues net of commissions) were down $5.6 million and $1.4 million as sales, particularly sales of variable products, have been negatively impacted by the equity markets. Sales by LFA of LNC's life insurance products, as measured by first year premiums, were $90.5 million for the first six months of 2003, about level with the same period in 2002, as sales of universal life insurance products were offset by lower sales of variable universal life insurance products. Sales by LFA of LNC's individual annuity products, as measured by deposits, were down $52.4 million, or 19%, and $16.1 million, or 11%, for the first six months and second quarter of 2003, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2003. Sales by LFA of Delaware retail mutual funds decreased 2% for the first six months of 2003 compared to the same period in 2002, but were up 28% in the second quarter of 2003 compared to the second quarter of 2002. Overall fees received for financial plans increased 10% in the first six months of 2003 and 13% in the second quarter of 2003 compared to the same periods of the prior year. The average fees per plan as calculated on a rolling twelve month average increased 5% for the twelve month period ending June 30, 2003 compared to the same period ending June 30, 2002. In addition, LFA continues to actively manage its expenses while continuing to focus on expansion of its planner base. The net number of planners (new planners joining LFA less planners leaving LFA) increased 1% at June 30, 2003 from June 30, 2002. Lincoln Financial Distributors ("LFD") LFD experienced an increase of $4.6 million in net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and an increase of $3.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003 compared to the same periods in 2002. LFD's net loss increased as lower sales reduced net revenues (gross revenues net of variable expenses). Although sales of Life Insurance and Investment products through LFD were up 27% and 6%, respectively, sales of annuity products were down 28% for the six months of 2003 compared to 2002. LNC Financing LNC Financing costs were $11.3 million higher in the six months ended June 30, 2003 and $4.2 million in the three months ended June 30, 2003 compared to the same periods in 2002. LNC Financing for the six and three month periods of 2002 included investment income of $14.1 million and $6.3 million, respectively, from the proceeds of the sale of LNC's reinsurance business to Swiss Re. During 2002, the proceeds were reduced by the repurchase of LNC stock and various financing activities. In December of 2002, the remaining proceeds were allocated to LNC's business units, primarily the Lincoln Retirement and Life Insurance segments. Excluding the investment income from the Swiss Re proceeds, LNC's financing costs declined due to lower interest rates and changes in LNC's debt structure, including the elimination of the outstanding commercial paper balance in the U.K. in the second quarter of 2002. Other Corporate Other Corporate had an improvement of $0.5 million in the first half of 2003 and a decrease of $4.1 million in the second quarter of 2003 compared to the same periods in 2002. In 2002, certain overhead expenses were not allocated to the business segments, but were reported within Other Corporate. There were various other accruals during the second quarter of 2002 that did not recur in 2003. Amortization of Deferred Gain The amortization of the deferred gain on the indemnity reinsurance transfer of LNC's reinsurance business to Swiss Re was lower for the six and three month periods ended June 30, 2003 compared to the same periods in 2002. Adjustments to the deferred gain resulting from the settlement with Swiss Re were recorded in the fourth quarter of 2002 resulting in lower amortization in 2003. In addition, in the first quarter of 2002, accelerated amortization of $1.3 million was recognized due to the novation of certain Canadian business to Swiss Re. Critical Accounting Policy - Personal Accident and Disability Income Reserves In the second quarter of 2002, LNC recognized a loss of $14.4 million resulting from an adjustment to certain reserves for disability income business sold to Swiss Re. There were no adjustments in 2003. Refer to Management's Discussion and Analysis of LNC's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, for a detailed discussion of this critical accounting policy. CONSOLIDATED INVESTMENTS (in billions) June 30, Dec 31, June 30, 2003 2000 2002 - --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assets Managed by Advisor Investment Management Segment (1): External Assets $52.4 $46.5 $48.7 Insurance Assets 43.9 41.1 38.5 Lincoln UK 6.7 6.4 6.7 Within Business Units (Policy Loans) 1.9 1.9 1.9 By Non-LNC Entities 22.5 20.0 23.7 ------- ------- -------- Total Assets Managed $127.4 $115.9 $119.5 Total Invested Assets $42.6 $40.0 $37.2 <TABLE> <CAPTION> Six Months Ended Three Months Ended June 30, June 30, (in millions) 2003 2002 2003 2002 - --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> Net Investment Income (pre-tax) $1,314.9 $1,312.2 $660.2 $657.4 Adjusted Net Investment Income (pre-tax) (2) 1,318.4 1,315.7 662.0 659.4 Mean Invested Assets (cost basis, in billions) $40.7 $38.2 $41.0 $38.2 Investment Yield (ratio of adjusted net investment income to mean invested assets) 6.49% 6.89% 6.46% 6.90% (1) See Investment Management segment data for additional detail. (2) Includes tax-exempt income on a tax equivalent basis. </TABLE> The total investment portfolio increased $2.6 billion in the first six months of 2003 from December 31, 2002, resulting from purchases of investments from cash flow generated by the business segments and an increase in the fair value of securities available-for-sale. LNC's insurance assets are invested primarily in high quality fixed maturity securities that are expected to generate cash flows that will enable LNC to meet the liability funding requirements of LNC's life insurance and annuity businesses. LNC has the ability to maintain its investment holdings throughout credit cycles because of its capital position, the long-term nature of its liabilities and matching of LNC's portfolios of investment assets with the liabilities of LNC's various products. The quality of LNC's fixed maturity securities portfolio, as measured by the percentage of fixed maturity securities invested in various ratings categories relative to the entire fixed maturity security portfolio, as of June 30, 2003 was as follows: Treasuries and AAA 19.5% BBB 35.9% AA 5.6% BB 3.9% A 32.4% Less than BB 2.7% The ratings data listed above have been determined by using the lowest of all publicly available ratings assigned to a particular fixed maturity security. If no public ratings exist, a rating is assigned based upon LNC's analysis of the inherent risks of the individual security. As of June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, $2.3 billion, or 6.6%, and $2.1 billion, or 6.6%, respectively, of all fixed maturity securities were invested in below investment grade securities (less than BBB). This represents 5.5% and 5.3% of the total investment portfolio at June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively. When viewed on a cost basis, below investment grade securities held at June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002 represented 7.5% and 8.4%, respectively, of fixed maturity securities. The rally in the credit markets continued through the second quarter of 2003 resulting in below investment grade securities, when measured on a market value basis, remaining at level consistent with December 31, 2002. When measured on cost basis, below investment grade securities showed a decrease from December 31, 2002 levels which resulted from asset sales, impairments and maturities. LNC's fixed maturity securities include residential and commercial mortgage-backed securities. Given that LNC's current product mix reflects an emphasis on fixed products, LNC has been relatively conservative in its asset allocation to residential mortgage-backed securities. LNC manages its prepayment risk on residential mortgage-backed securities by prudently limiting the portion of its fixed maturity portfolio that is invested in the asset class, by generally avoiding the purchase of securities with a cost that significantly exceeds par and by purchasing securities with no more prepayment sensitivity than the underlying collateral. LNC's investments in residential mortgage-backed securities at June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002 totaled $2.5 billion and $3.1 billion, respectively, representing 5.9% and 7.8% of total invested assets, respectively. Investments in commercial mortgage-backed securities at June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002 totaled $2.2 billion and $1.8 billion, respectively, representing 5.2% and 4.5%, respectively. The fair value of all private securities was $4.9 billion and $4.6 billion at June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively, representing about 11.5% of total invested assets for both periods. This excludes section 144 registered securities, which have fair values that are readily available for these publicly-traded securities. LNC's entire fixed maturity and equity securities portfolio is classified as "available-for-sale" and is carried at fair value. Changes in fair value, net of related deferred acquisition costs, amounts required to satisfy policyholder commitments and taxes, are charged or credited directly to shareholders' equity. Other than temporary changes in fair value are recorded as realized losses in the income statement. During the six and three months ended June 30, 2003, LNC sold securities at gains and at losses. In the process of evaluating whether a security with an unrealized loss reflects an other than temporary decline, LNC considers its ability and intent to hold the security until its value recovers. However, subsequent decisions on securities sales are made within the context of overall risk monitoring, assessing value relative to other comparable securities and overall portfolio maintenance. Although LNC's portfolio managers may, at a given point in time, believe that the preferred course of action is to hold securities with unrealized losses that are considered temporary until such losses are recovered, the dynamic nature of portfolio management may result in a subsequent decision to sell. These subsequent decisions are consistent with the classification of LNC's investment portfolio as available-for-sale. LNC expects to continue to manage all invested assets within its portfolios in a manner that is consistent with the available-for-sale classification. LNC is also considering whether to reclassify certain invested assets associated with reinsurance agreements as trading account assets. See discussion under "Accounting for Modified Coinsurance" for more information. Critical Accounting Policy - Realized Gain (Loss) on Investments Sales and Write-downs: LNC had net pre-tax realized losses on investments and derivatives of $94.1 million and $184.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, and $2.7 million and $81.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Prior to the amortization of acquisition costs, provision for policyholder commitments and investment expenses, net pre-tax realized losses were $172.3 million and $269.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, and $14.4 million and $119.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Gross realized gains on fixed maturity and equity securities were $124.9 million and $86.7 million, and gross realized losses on fixed maturity and equity securities were $256.9 million and $99.2 million for the six and three months ended June 30, 2003, respectively. The realized gains and losses exclude realized gains and losses on equity securities related to participating policies in the Lincoln UK segment. These realized gains and losses were credited to the policyholder and did not affect LNC's net income. Included within losses are write-downs for impairments of $174.1 million and $36.8 million in the six and three months ended June 30, 2003, respectively. While realized losses from sales and write-downs occurred in a number of sectors, approximately 61% of gross losses for the six months ended June 30, 2003, excluding the losses on equity securities in the Lincoln UK segment described above, were attributed to losses on sales and write-downs in airlines, electric utilities and asset-backed securities ("ABS") including ABS investments collateralized by manufactured housing receivables, as well as Collateralized Debt Obligations (CDOs). In the second quarter of 2003, approximately 36% of the gross losses were attributed to losses on sales and write-downs in ABS, mainly from CDOs, and electric utilities. The remaining gross realized losses were distributed among several sectors and industries, none of which represented more than 10% of total gross realized losses. The following discussion provides details relating to gross realized losses taken during the first six months and second quarter of 2003 in these sectors. LNC's exposure to the airline sector is primarily equipment trust certificates (ETCs) and enhanced equipment trust certificates (EETCs). Aircraft owned or operated by domestic air carriers collateralize these securities. The war in Iraq, continued weak economic data, intense competition in the industry and the sale of several aircraft by one domestic carrier all put downward pressure on valuations of securities issued by domestic carriers. The sale of aircraft in the first half of 2003 provided a market-clearing price for used aircraft at levels lower than what the market had previously anticipated. This resulted in a re-evaluation of the underlying collateral in ETC and EETC structures. The combination of these factors, along with increased concerns reflected in the market relating to the potential bankruptcy filing for AMR Corporation, resulted in a $48.6 million write-down on AMR Corporation's ETCs to current market fair value in the first quarter of 2003. There were no further losses reported on AMR in the second quarter of 2003. The change in valuation of the underlying aircraft and continued economic pressures on the sector also led to additional write-downs of UAL Corporation's ETCs/EETCs of $8.9 million and $3.3 million during the six and three months ended June 30, 2003, respectively. Electric utility sector losses were taken on selected issuers whose securities had not recovered with the rest of the electric utility issues in the market. The deterioration of these securities, along with a lack of improvement of the underlying credit, led to the determination that these securities were other than temporarily impaired. Losses taken in this sector totaled $40.5 million in the first six months of 2003 and $15.8 million in the second quarter of 2003. ABS secured by manufactured housing receivables have experienced deterioration in value, following the bankruptcy filing of a major servicer in the industry. This servicer was granted changes to the existing servicing agreements by the bankruptcy court. Servicing fees were increased and were moved to a more senior position in the capital structure. For those securities where the subordination was not at levels high enough to withstand this increase in fees without impairing value, write-downs of $14.1 million were recorded during the six months ended June 30, 2003, all of which occurred in the first quarter of 2003. Deterioration in the underlying collateral pools of other ABS investments during the first six months of 2003 led to decreased expectations of future cash flows. As a result, additional losses of $43.5 million and $20.0 million, respectively, on various ABS holdings, including CDOs, were also recorded during the six and three months ended June 30, 2003. Sales and write-downs have reduced LNC's CDO exposure from 1.6% of invested assets at December 31, 2002 to 1.3% of LNC's invested assets at June 30, 2003 as measured on a cost basis, with over 90% of the CDOs remaining investment grade. The unrealized loss position on the CDO portfolio has been reduced to approximately $26 million. Any further deterioration or additional realized losses in the CDO portfolio will depend on economic factors such as economic growth, corporate profitability and future asset default rates. Cash flow testing of the CDO portfolio as required under EITF 99-20 supports the conclusion that these unrealized losses are temporary. A full recovery of principal and interest is expected under the current economic environment. Following the strong rally in the credit markets that extended through the second quarter 2003, especially in the higher risks sectors of the market, several securities were liquidated in order to reposition the below investment grade and investment grade investments within selected portfolios. The sale of these higher risk securities resulted in a reduction of below investment grade securities as well as a repositioning of our investment grade holdings. Gross realized losses of $15.8 million in the electric utility sector as well as losses in industrials, pipelines, sovereigns and other sectors contributed to gross realized losses on sold securities of $63.9 million. Other than the losses discussed above, no sector or industry contributed more than $10 million to realized losses for the quarter. Both gains and losses were realized as a result of this asset repositioning. For additional information regarding LNC's process for determining whether declines in fair value of securities available-for-sale are other than temporary, see the discussion in LNC's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 under "Critical Accounting Policy Write-Downs and Allowances for Losses." Unrealized Gains and Losses: When considering unrealized gain and loss information, it is important to realize that the information relates to the status of securities at a particular point in time, and may not be indicative of the status of LNC's investment portfolios subsequent to the balance sheet date. Further, since the timing of the recognition of realized investment gains and losses through the selection of which securities are sold is largely at management's discretion, it is important to consider the information provided below within the context of the overall unrealized gain or loss position of LNC's investment portfolios. These are important considerations that should be included in any evaluation of the potential impact of unrealized loss securities upon LNC's future earnings. LNC had an overall net unrealized gain (after the amortization of acquisition costs, provision for policyholder commitments, investment expenses and taxes) on securities available-for-sale under FAS 115 of $1,117.8 million and $753.3 million at June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively. At June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, gross unrealized gains on securities available-for-sale were $3,405.1 million and $2,402.5 million, respectively, and gross unrealized losses on securities available-for-sale were $294.4 million and $735.4 million, respectively. At June 30, 2003, gross unrealized gains and gross unrealized losses on fixed maturity securities available-for-sale were $3,382.9 million and $285.3 million, respectively, and gross unrealized gains and losses on equity securities available-for-sale were $22.1 million and $9.1 million, respectively. At December 31, 2002, gross unrealized gains and gross unrealized losses on fixed maturity securities available-for-sale were $2,355.3 million and $690.9 million, respectively, and gross unrealized gains and losses on equity securities available-for-sale were $47.2 million and $44.5 million, respectively. Unrealized Losses on Securities Subject to Enhanced Analysis and Monitoring: Within the portfolio of securities with unrealized losses are certain securities that LNC has identified as exhibiting indications that the decline in fair value may be other than a temporary decline in value. Where detailed analysis by LNC credit analysts and investment portfolio managers leads to the conclusion that a security's decline in fair value is other than temporary, the security is written down to fair value. In instances where declines are considered temporary, the security will continue to be carefully monitored. The following information is applicable to unrealized loss securities that were subject to these enhanced analysis and monitoring processes. For traded and private securities held by LNC at June 30, 2003 that were subject to enhanced analysis and monitoring for potential changes in unrealized loss status, the fair value, amortized cost, unrealized loss and total time period that the security has been in an unrealized loss position are presented in the table below. <TABLE> <CAPTION> Unrealized Losses - Available-for-Sale Securities Subject to Enhanced Analysis and Monitoring June 30, 2003 % % % Fair Amortized Amortized Unrealized Unrealized (000s omitted) Fair Value Value Cost Cost Loss Loss - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <= 90 days $45,692 17.1% $48,095 14.5% $(2,403) 3.8% > 90 days but <= 180 days 41,135 15.4 50,132 15.2 (8,997) 14.1 > 180 days but <= 270 days 59,818 22.4 69,974 21.2 (10,156) 15.9 > 270 days but <= 1 year 10,595 4.0 10,595 3.2 -- -- > 1 year 109,616 41.1 151,757 45.9 (42,141) 66.2 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total $266,856 100.0% $330,553 100.0% $(63,697) 100.0% ============================================================================= LNC has no concentrations of issuers or guarantors of fixed maturity and equity securities. The composition by industry categories of securities subject to enhanced analysis and monitoring for potential changes in unrealized loss status held by LNC at June 30, 2003 is presented in the table below. </TABLE> <TABLE> <CAPTION> Unrealized Losses by Industry Sector - Available-for-Sale Securities Subject to Enhanced Analysis and Monitoring June 30, 2003 % % Fair Amortized % Amortized Unrealized Unrealized (000s omitted) Fair Value Value Cost Cost Loss Loss - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> Electric Utility $78,281 29.3% $104,371 31.6% $(26,090) 41.0% Asset-Backed Securities 83,516 31.3 100,504 30.4 (16,988) 26.7 Chemicals 21,000 7.9 30,000 9.1 (9,000) 14.1 Media Cable 18,466 6.9 24,424 7.4 (5,958) 9.3 Airlines 7,062 2.7 9,836 3.0 (2,774) 4.4 Consumer Non-Cyclical 7,488 2.8 9,386 2.8 (1,898) 3.0 CMBS 7,368 2.8 7,904 2.4 (536) 0.8 Consumer Cyclical 625 0.2 769 0.2 (144) 0.2 Oil Field Services 8,375 3.2 8,509 2.6 (134) 0.2 Consumer Services Cyclical 5,947 2.2 6,064 1.8 (117) 0.2 Textile 8,617 3.2 8,672 2.6 (55) 0.1 Other 20,111 7.5 20,114 6.1 (3) -- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ------------ ---------- Total $266,856 100.0% $330,553 100.0% $(63,697) 100.0% ========== ========== ========== ========== ============ ========== </TABLE> At June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, about 28% and 9%, respectively, of the traded and private securities held that were subject to enhanced analysis and monitoring for potential changes in unrealized loss status were rated as investment grade. The range of maturity dates for these securities varies, with about 35% of these securities maturing between 5 and 10 years, about 43% maturing in greater than 10 years and the remaining securities maturing in less than 5 years. Unrealized Loss on All Below-Investment-Grade Fixed Maturity Securities: Gross unrealized losses on all below-investment-grade securities were $168.4 million at June 30, 2003, representing 58.9% of total gross unrealized losses on all available-for-sale securities, excluding the available-for-sale securities in the Lincoln UK segment. Generally, below-investment-grade fixed maturity securities are more likely than investment-grade securities to develop credit concerns. The remaining $117.3 million or 41.1% of the gross unrealized losses relates to investment grade available-for-sale securities. The ratios of market value to amortized cost reflected in the table below are not necessarily indicative of the market value to amortized cost relationships for the securities throughout the entire time that the securities have been in an unrealized loss position nor are they necessarily indicative of these ratios subsequent to June 30, 2003. <TABLE> <CAPTION> Unrealized Losses Below-Investment-Grade Fixed Maturity Securities June 30, 2003 Aging Category (000s omitted) Bk Mkt Ratio Fair Value Amortized Cost Unrealized Loss - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <=90 days 70% to 100% $246,551 $256,718 $(10,167) 40% to 70% 1,425 3,360 (1,935) Below 40% -- 173 (173) ----------------------------------------------------------- <=90 days Total 247,976 260,251 (12,275) >90 days but <=180 days 70% to 100% 18,028 19,185 (1,157) 40% to 70% 300 500 (200) Below 40% -- -- -- ----------------------------------------------------------- >90 days but <=180 days Total 18,328 19,685 (1,357) >180 days but <=270 days 70% to 100% 213,415 241,683 (28,268) 40% to 70% 1,350 2,252 (902) Below 40% 42 107 (65) ----------------------------------------------------------- >180 days but <=270 days Total 214,807 244,042 (29,235) >270 days but <=1 year 70% to 100% 110,912 128,176 (17,264) 40% to 70% 9,989 14,270 (4,281) Below 40% -- -- -- ----------------------------------------------------------- >270 days but <=1 year Total 120,901 142,446 (21,545) >1 year 70% to 100% 447,607 508,902 (61,295) 40% to 70% 71,563 114,221 (42,658) Below 40% -- -- -- ----------------------------------------------------------- >1 year Total 519,170 623,123 (103,953) ----------------------------------------------------------- Total Below-Investment-Grade $1,121,182 $1,289,547 $(168,365) =========================================================== </TABLE> Unrealized Losses on All Securities: For total traded and private available-for-sale securities held by LNC at June 30, 2003 that are in unrealized loss status, the amortized cost, fair value, unrealized loss and total time period that the security has been in an unrealized loss position are presented in the table below. <TABLE> <CAPTION> Unrealized Losses - All Available-for-Sale Securities June 30, 2003 % % Fair Amortized % Amortized Unrealized Unrealized (000s omitted) Fair Value Value Cost Cost Loss Loss - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <= 90 days $1,643,386 44.3% $1,667,860 41.6% $(24,474) 8.3% > 90 days but <= 180 days 248,970 6.7 262,880 6.6 (13,910) 4.7 > 180 days but <= 270 days 521,339 14.0 569,212 14.2 (47,873) 16.3 > 270 days but <= 1 year 207,298 5.6 233,918 5.8 (26,620) 9.0 > 1 year 1,090,925 29.4 1,272,399 31.8 (181,474) 61.7 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total $3,711,918 100.0% $4,006,269 100.0% $(294,351) 100.0% =============================================================================== </TABLE> The composition by industry categories of total securities available-for-sale in unrealized loss status, held by LNC at June 30, 2003 is presented in the table below. Unrealized Losses by Industry Sector - All Available-for-Sale Securities June 30, 2003 <TABLE> <CAPTION> % % Fair Amortized % Amortized Unrealized Unrealized (000s omitted) Fair Value Value Cost Cost Loss Loss - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> Electric Utility $393,107 10.6% $453,901 11.3% $(60,794) 20.7% Airlines 188,494 5.1 237,356 5.9 (48,862) 16.6 Banking 370,130 10.0 410,446 10.3 (40,316) 13.7 Asset-Backed Securities 583,852 15.7 623,093 15.6 (39,241) 13.3 Sovereigns 192,857 5.2 205,008 5.1 (12,151) 4.1 Chemicals 55,557 1.5 66,741 1.7 (11,184) 3.8 Automotive 96,336 2.6 106,975 2.7 (10,639) 3.6 CMBS 69,129 1.9 79,735 2.0 (10,606) 3.6 Refining 16,835 0.5 23,400 0.6 (6,565) 2.2 Media Cable 23,746 0.6 29,790 0.7 (6,044) 2.1 Retailers 43,679 1.2 49,457 1.2 (5,778) 2.0 Industrial Other 27,623 0.8 31,523 0.8 (3,900) 1.3 Pipelines 41,993 1.1 45,010 1.1 (3,017) 1.0 Transportation Services 50,804 1.4 53,792 1.3 (2,988) 1.0 Utility Other 27,123 0.7 29,996 0.7 (2,873) 1.0 Wirelines 78,393 2.1 80,516 2.0 (2,123) 0.7 CMO 156,577 4.2 158,670 4.0 (2,093) 0.7 Consumer Non Cyclical 7,488 0.2 9,386 0.2 (1,898) 0.7 Metals and Mining 56,925 1.5 58,748 1.5 (1,823) 0.6 Mortgage 18,218 0.5 19,444 0.5 (1,226) 0.4 Media Non-Cable 15,273 0.4 16,495 0.4 (1,222) 0.4 Food and Beverage 14,058 0.4 15,149 0.4 (1,091) 0.4 Supermarkets 40,837 1.1 41,859 1.0 (1,022) 0.4 Industries with unrealized losses of < $1 million 939,995 25.3 948,240 23.7 (8,245) 2.8 Lincoln UK Fixed Maturity Securities 186,742 5.0 191,456 4.8 (4,714) 1.6 Lincoln UK Equity Securities 16,147 0.4 20,083 0.5 (3,936) 1.3 - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total $3,711,918 100.0% $4,006,269 100.0% $(294,351) 100.0% ================================================================================ </TABLE> At June 30, 2003, the range of maturity dates for total traded and private securities available-for-sale in unrealized loss status varies, with about 18% maturing between 5 and 10 years, 45% maturing after 10 years and the remaining securities maturing in less than 5 years. As of June 30, 2003, gross unrealized losses including assets held at Lincoln UK totaled $294.4 million, a 48% improvement over gross unrealized losses of $565.0 million at March 31, 2003. This improvement resulted from a strong recovery in market values of securities in high-risk sectors as well as sales of securities that participated in this rally. As of June 30, 2003 there were unrealized losses of $189.2 million in the electrical utility, airline, banking and ABS sectors, representing 64.3% of total unrealized losses. LNC's view of risk factors at June 30, 2003 with respect to these industries is presented below. The electric utility sector continues to be LNC's most significant unrealized loss sector with $60.8 million of unrealized losses at June 30, 2003. During the first half of 2003, several utilities were able to complete asset sales and secure the financing needed in order to weather the trough in the energy cycle. The market is now expecting those yet to secure financing will be able to do so at terms that are palatable. The announcement in the first quarter of 2003 of the settlement between the FERC and a large energy provider relieved some of the concerns regarding the future litigation risks of all energy providers in California. With the overhang of litigation and potentially debilitating settlements mitigated, valuations of utility paper are improving. LNC believes that as the over-capacity in the market for electricity is rectified by increased economic activity and as old, inefficient power plants are taken off-line, margins should begin to revert to mid-cycle valuations. As this cycle progresses, LNC expects to see further improvement in this sector and believes that the unrealized losses in this sector are temporary. Airline holdings ended the second quarter 2003 with an unrealized loss of $48.9 million, an improvement of $50.4 million over December 31, 2002 and $47.7 million over March 31, 2003. In contrast to the airline securities that were written down in the first quarter of 2003, the securities of relatively stronger carriers have improved in market value significantly during the second quarter. For these relatively stronger airlines, LNC believes that the unrealized loss positions at June 30, 2003 are temporary, and LNC expects an ultimate recovery of full principal and interest as these securities mature. All of LNC's airline holdings in an unrealized loss position are secured as either ETC or EETC structures. For the portion of the airline sector exposure that is invested in EETC structures, LNC holds securities that are enhanced through the liquidity facilities present in these securities and their relatively higher quality aircraft collateral pools. The majority of unrealized loss in the banking sector is economically offset by unrealized gain in the derivative portfolio for hedging that is related to these securities. Of the $40.3 million of unrealized loss in the banking industry, $30.6 million is related to securities with offsetting derivative gains. The unrealized gain on the derivative positions relating to these securities was $45.6 million at the end of the second quarter 2003. All the underlying credits that have been swapped have an average rating of A+ and LNC does not anticipate any credit-related losses on these securities. The asset-backed securities (ABS) exposure of the LNC portfolio ended the second quarter of 2003 with an unrealized loss of $39.2 million. Of this amount, $25.9 million relates to CDOs and $8.4 million relates to ABS secured by manufactured housing receivables. CDOs have experienced pressure due to the nature of the assets, poor collateral experience and the specific risk of downgrade for individual tranches held by LNC. LNC has performed the cash flow testing required by EITF 99-20 and, based on that analysis, anticipates full recovery of principal and interest. As a result, these unrealized losses are considered temporary. ABSs secured by manufactured housing receivables have experienced deterioration in value following the bankruptcy filing of a major servicer in the industry. This servicer was granted changes to the existing servicing agreements by the bankruptcy court. Servicing fees were increased and were moved to a more senior position in the capital structure. For those securities that were adversely affected by this change, LNC recorded write-downs in the first six months of 2003. Where LNC held positions that are not believed to be affected by the change in fee structure, LNC expects to fully recover principal and interest. Unrealized Loss on Fixed Maturity Securities Available-for-Sale in Excess of $10 million: As of June 30, 2003, LNC held fixed maturity securities available-for-sale with gross unrealized losses of $10 million, or greater, as discussed below. At June 30, 2003 there were no investment grade securities with gross unrealized losses of $10 million or greater. <TABLE> <CAPTION> Fixed Maturity Securities Unrealized Losses Greater Than $10 million June 30, 2003 Amortized Unrealized Length of Time (000s Omitted) Fair Value Cost Loss in a Loss Position - -------------- ------------------------------------------------------------- <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> Non-Investment-Grade -------------------- Power Generation Project Finance $33,750 $45,000 $(11,250) >180 days but <=270 days U.S. Utility Company 30,943 52,112 (21,169) >1 year U.S. Based International Airline 52,663 73,242 (20,579) >1 year U.S. Based International Airline 51,964 65,473 (13,509) >1 year ------------------------------ Total Non-Investment Grade $169,320 $235,827 $(66,507) ============================== </TABLE> The information presented above is subject to rapidly changing conditions. As such, LNC expects that the level of securities with overall unrealized gains and losses will fluctuate, as will the level of unrealized loss securities that are subject to enhanced analysis and monitoring. Mortgage Loans on Real Estate: As of June 30, 2003, mortgage loans on real estate and investments in real estate represented 10.1% and 0.6% of LNC's total investment portfolio, respectively. As of June 30, 2003, the underlying properties supporting the mortgage loans on real estate consisted of 38.7% in commercial office buildings, 22.4% in retail stores, 17.9% in industrial buildings, 10.0% in apartments, 7.4% in hotels/motels and 3.6% in other. In addition to the dispersion by property type, the mortgage loan portfolio is geographically diversified throughout the United States. The following summarizes key information on mortgage loans: June 30 December 31 (in millions) 2003 2002 -------------- -------- ----------- Total Portfolio (net of reserves) $4,314.3 $4,205.5 Impaired mortgage loans $75.5 $72.3 Impaired mortgage loans as a percentage of total mortgage loans 1.7% 1.7% Mortgage loans two or more payments delinquent (including in process of foreclosure) $33.3 $1.9 Restructured loans in good standing 3.4 4.6 Reserve for mortgage loans $12.1 $11.9 All mortgage loans that are impaired have an established allowance for credit loss. Changing economic conditions impact LNC's valuation of mortgage loans. Current market data, such as local vacancy, rental, discount and capitalization rates, are incorporated into the discounted cash flow analysis that LNC performs for monitored loans and may contribute to the establishment of (or an increase in) an allowance for credit losses. In addition, LNC continues to monitor its entire commercial mortgage portfolio to identify risks. Areas of current emphasis are the hotel mortgage loan portfolio and retail, office and industrial properties anchored by deteriorating credits or experienced debt coverage reduction. Where warranted, LNC has established or increased loss reserves based upon this analysis. Impaired mortgage loans as a percentage of total mortgage loans at June 30, 2003 have increased over the last year as a result of increased credit losses in the sectors noted above, but has remained at a level consistent with December 31, 2002. This percentage was 1.7%, 1.7%, 0.6%, 0.5%, 0.6%, 0.8%, 1.1%, 1.9% and 3.9% as of June, 30, 2003, December 31, 2002, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1998, 1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively. Fixed maturity securities available-for-sale, mortgage loans on real estate and real estate that were non-income producing for the six and three months ended June 30, 2003 were not significant. As of June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, the fair value of non-income producing securities was $82.3 million and $37.3 million, respectively. Net Investment Income Net investment income was flat in the six and three months ended June 30, 2003 when compared with the same periods of 2002. The overall yield on investments decreased to 6.49% from 6.89% for the six months ended June 30, 2003 compared to the same period in 2002. The decrease in the yield was primarily due to lower interest rates on new securities purchased along with additional security defaults during the last year. Mean invested assets increased 6.5% for the six months ended June 30, 2003 compared to the first six months of 2002. This increase was due primarily to positive fixed annuity flows and new life insurance business generated over the last year. REVIEW OF CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL CONDITION Liquidity, Cash Flow and Capital Resources Liquidity refers to the ability of an enterprise to generate adequate amounts of cash from its normal operations to meet cash requirements with a prudent margin of safety. Because of the interval of time from receipt of a deposit or premium until payment of benefits or claims, LNC and other insurers employ investment portfolios as an integral element of operations. By segmenting its investment portfolios along product lines, LNC enhances the focus and discipline it can apply to managing the liquidity as well as the interest rate and credit risk of each portfolio commensurate with the profile of the liabilities. For example, portfolios backing products with less certain cash flows and/or withdrawal provisions are kept more liquid than portfolios backing products with more predictable cash flows. The consolidated statements of cash flows in the June 30, 2003 unaudited consolidated financial statements indicates that operating activities provided cash of $399.7 million during the first six months of 2003. This statement also classifies the other sources and uses of cash by investing activities and financing activities and discloses the total amount of cash available to meet LNC's obligations. Although LNC generates adequate cash flow to meet the needs of its normal operations, periodically LNC may issue debt or equity securities to fund internal expansion, acquisitions, investment opportunities and the retirement of LNC's debt and equity. In July 2001, the LNC Board authorized the repurchase of $500 million of LNC's securities. On August 8, 2002, the LNC Board authorized the repurchase of up to an additional $600 million of LNC securities. The remaining amount under the combined repurchase authorization at June 30, 2003 was $675.1 million. On June 24, 2003 LNC announced plans to redeem the $200 million 7.40% TOPrS issued by Lincoln Capital III and guaranteed by LNC. The redemption date was July 24, 2003. A loss of $3.6 million related to unamortized issuance costs will be reported in the third quarter of 2003 related to the redemption. LNC's insurance subsidiaries are subject to certain insurance department regulatory restrictions as to the transfer of funds and payment of dividends to the holding company. Generally, these restrictions pose no short-term liquidity concerns for the holding company. However, the acquisition of two blocks of business in 1998 resulted in negative statutory earned surplus for LNL which triggered certain approval requirements in order for LNL to declare and pay dividends to LNC. As a result of negative earned surplus, LNL was required to obtain the prior approval of the Indiana Insurance Commissioner ("Commissioner") before paying any dividends to LNC until its statutory earned surplus became positive. During the first quarter 2002, LNL received approval from the Commissioner to reclassify total dividends of $495 million paid to LNC in 2001 from LNL's earned surplus to paid-in-capital. This change plus the increase in statutory earned surplus from the indemnity reinsurance transaction with Swiss Re resulted in positive statutory earned surplus for LNL at December 31, 2001. In general, dividends are not subject to prior approval from the Commissioner provided LNL's statutory earned surplus is positive and such dividends do not exceed the standard limitation of the greater of 10% of total statutory earned surplus or the amount of statutory earnings in the prior calendar year. As a result of the payment of dividends and statutory losses in 2002, LNL's statutory earned surplus was negative as of December 31, 2002. The statutory losses resulted from realized losses on investments, the effect of the equity markets and the reserve strengthening in 2002 related to the reinsurance business sold to Swiss Re. Due to the negative statutory earned surplus as of December 31, 2002, any dividend(s) paid by LNL in 2003 will be subject to prior approval from the Commissioner. As occurred in 2001, dividends approved and paid while statutory earned surplus is negative are expected to be classified as a reduction to paid-in-capital. LNL is recognized as an accredited reinsurer in the state of New York, which effectively enables it to conduct reinsurance business with unrelated insurance companies that are domiciled within the state of New York. As a result, in addition to regulatory restrictions imposed by the state of Indiana, LNL is also subject to the regulatory requirements that the state of New York imposes upon accredited reinsurers. A key component of managing LNC's overall liquidity and capital position is managing the capital of LNC's insurance subsidiaries. The level of capital maintained in the domestic insurance subsidiaries is subject to the requirements of the NAIC's risk based capital ("RBC"). While maintaining capital within the requirements of the NAIC RBC formula is a primary focus, LNC actively monitors similar capital quality measures produced by the rating agencies. These models are subject to adjustment from time-to-time and, together with potential NAIC RBC adjustments, could impact LNC's ongoing capital and liquidity management. As of June 30, 2003, LNC's senior debt ratings were Moody's at A3 ("Upper Medium Grade"), Standard and Poor's at A- ("Strong"), Fitch at A ("Strong") and A.M. Best at "a" ("Strong"), and LNC's commercial paper ratings included Moody's at P-2 ("Strong"), Standard and Poor's at A-2 ("Satisfactory") and Fitch at F-1 ("Very Strong"). Although there are less investors for A-2/P-2 commercial paper and there are periods in which there is weak investor interest in A-2/P-2 commercial paper, through June 30, 2003, liquidity has not been adversely impacted. LNC can draw upon alternative short-term borrowing facilities such as revolving bank lines of credit. On the average, LNC's commercial paper borrowing rates have increased 0.20% per annum since LNC was downgraded to an A-2/P-2 issuer. However, historically there have been times of greater volatility in commercial paper borrowing rates for an A-2/P-2 issuer with the spread above A-1/P-1 rates ranging from 0.10% to 0.50%. During such times of greater volatility, LNC may experience difficulty in placing longer-term commercial paper (defined as 30-90 day maturities), and as a result, experience increased short-term financing costs. Total shareholders' equity increased $468.5 million during the six months ended June 30, 2003. Accumulated other comprehensive income increased shareholders' equity by $381.6 million. The components of the changes to accumulated other comprehensive income were: $365.0 million related to the increase in the net unrealized gain on securities available-for-sale and derivative instruments, $17.5 million related to a change in the accumulated foreign exchange adjustment, and a decrease of $0.9 million related to the effect of foreign currency changes on the minimum pension liability adjustment. Excluding changes due to other comprehensive income, shareholders' equity increased $86.9 million. This increase is due to $184.3 million of net income, $8.1 million from the issuance/forfeiture of common stock under benefit plans and a $15.4 million net increase to additional paid-in to record stock-based compensation and decreases due to $120.9 million from the declaration of dividends to shareholders. Contingencies Refer to Note 5 to the June 30, 2003 unaudited consolidated financial statements for information regarding contingencies. Item 3 Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure of Market Risk - ------ LNC provided a discussion of its market risk in Item 7A of its 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002. During the first six months of 2003, there was no substantive change to LNC's market risk except for the items noted below: Interest Rate Risk - Falling Rates. As discussed in the Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk section of LNC's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, interest spreads would be at risk on LNC's fixed annuity and interest-sensitive whole life, universal life and fixed portion of variable universal life insurance policies if interest rates continued to fall and remained lower for a period of time. The following table provides detail on the difference between interest crediting rates and minimum guaranteed rates as of June 30, 2003. For example, at June 30, 2003, there are $5.276 billion of combined Retirement and Life Insurance account values where the excess of the crediting rate over contract minimums is between 1.01% and 1.50%. The analysis presented below ignores any non-guaranteed elements within the life insurance products such as cost of insurance or expense loads which, for many products, may be redetermined in the event that interest margins deteriorate below the level that would cause the credited rate to equal the minimum guaranteed rate. <TABLE> <CAPTION> Excess of Crediting Rates over Contract Minimums ----------------------------------------------------- As of June 30, 2003 (in millions) Retirement Life Total % - ---------------------------------- -------------- ---------- ----------- ------------ <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> CD and On-Benefit type annuities $4,577 $-- $4,577 14.6% Discretionary rate setting products* No difference 6,226 1,569 7,795 24.8% up to .1% 372 -- 372 1.2% ..11% to .20% 102 110 212 0.7% ..21% to .30% 92 -- 92 0.3% ..31% to .40% 132 991 1,123 3.6% ..41% to .50% 5,377 38 5,415 17.3% ..51% to .60% 537 -- 537 1.7% ..61% to .70% 55 59 114 0.4% ..71% to .80% 133 495 628 2.0% ..81% to .90% 89 111 200 0.6% ..91% to 1.0% 1,524 1,050 2,574 8.2% 1.01% to 1.50% 590 4,686 5,276 16.8% 1.51% to 2.00% 803 1,226 2,029 6.5% 2.01% to 2.50% 230 148 378 1.2% 2.51% to 3.00% 22 18 40 0.1% 3.01% and above 3 -- 3 0.0% - ---------------------------------- -------------- ---------- ----------- ------------ Total Discretionary rate setting products 16,287 10,501 26,788 85.4% - ---------------------------------- -------------- ---------- ----------- ------------ Grand Total $20,864 $10,501 $31,365 100.0% ============== ========== ========== ============ </TABLE> Equity Market Exposures. See the discussion captioned Third Quarter 2003 Guidance for the Estimated Effect of Equity Market Volatility for updated guidance for the estimated effect of equity market volatility. The following is a discussion of changes to LNC's derivative positions. Derivatives As discussed in Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2002, LNC has entered into derivative transactions to reduce its exposure to fluctuations in interest rates, the risk of changes in liabilities indexed to LNC stock, credit risk and foreign exchange risk. In addition, LNC is subject to risks associated with changes in the value of its derivatives; however, such changes in value are generally offset by changes in the value of the items being hedged by such contracts. Modifications to LNC's derivative strategy are initiated periodically upon review of the Company's overall risk assessment. During the first six months of 2003, the more significant changes in LNC's derivative positions are as follows: 1. Entered into 1.1 billion notional of interest rate cap agreements that are used to hedge its annuity business against the negative impact of a significant and sustained rise in interest rates. A total of 0.2 billion notional expired resulting in a total remaining 2.1 billion notional. The expiration in notional resulted in no gain or loss. 2. Decreased its use of swaptions that are used to hedge its annuity business against the negative impact of a significant and sustained rise in interest rates from 180.0 million notional to 30.0 million notional. The decrease in notional is a result of expirations and resulted in no gain or loss. 3. Entered into interest rate swap agreements hedging floating rate bond coupon payments in the amount of 40.0 million notional. A total of 13.6 million notional expired resulting in a total remaining 455.5 million notional. These interest rate swap agreements convert floating rate bond coupon payments into a fixed rate of return. No gain or loss was recognized as a result of the expirations. 4. Entered into foreign exchange forward contracts in the amount of 53.0 million notional that are hedging the foreign currency exposure of a portion of LNC's investment in its Lincoln UK subsidiary. A total of 54.9 million notional expired resulting in a total remaining 41.1 million notional. No gain or loss was recognized as a result of the expirations. 5. Decreased its use of credit default swaps from 26.0 million notional to 8.0 million notional. The decrease in notional is a result of expirations and resulted in no gain or loss. LNC uses credit default swaps to hedge against a drop in bond prices due to credit concerns of certain bond issuers. 6. Entered into 0.3 million call options on an equal number of shares of LNC stock, resulting in a total of 1.6 million call options on an equal number of shares of LNC stock. A total of 0.02 million call options were terminated, resulting in no gain or loss. These call options are hedging the increase in liabilities arising from stock appreciation rights granted on LNC stock. Additional stock appreciation rights were granted to LNC agents during the first quarter of 2003. LNC is exposed to credit loss in the event of non-performance by counterparties on various derivative contracts. However, LNC does not anticipate non-performance by any of the counterparties. The credit risk associated with such agreements is minimized by purchasing such agreements from financial institutions with long-standing superior performance records. Item 4 -- Controls and Procedures - ------ LNC maintains disclosure controls and procedures, which are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company's management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. An evaluation of the effectiveness of LNC's disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2003 was conducted under the supervision and with the participation of LNC's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Based on that evaluation, the LNC's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that LNC's disclosure controls and procedures were adequate and designed to ensure that material information relating to LNC and its consolidated subsidiaries would be made known to the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer by others within those entities, particularly during the periods when periodic reports under the Exchange Act are being prepared. Furthermore, there has been no change in the LNC's internal control over financial reporting, identified in connection with the evaluation of such control, that occurred during LNC's last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, LNC's internal control over financial reporting. Refer to the Certifications by the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer filed as exhibits to this report. PART II - OTHER INFORMATION AND EXHIBITS Items 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 of this Part II are either inapplicable or are answered in the negative and are omitted pursuant to the instructions to Part II. Item 4 Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders (a) The matters discussed below were submitted to and voted on by Shareholders of the Registrant at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Registrant on May 8, 2003. 1. To elect four directors for three year terms Jenne K. Britell M. Leanne Lachman Votes cast for = 149,900,171 Votes cast for = 148,171,078 Votes withheld = 4,435,208 Votes withheld = 6,164,321 Ron J. Ponder Jill S. Ruckelshaus Votes cast for = 151,772,215 Votes cast for = 151,416,370 Votes withheld = 2,563,184 Votes withheld = 2,919,029 Item 6 Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K (a) The following Exhibits of the Registrant are included in this report. (Note: The number preceding the exhibit corresponds to the specific number within Item 601 of Regulation S-K.) 10 (a) Agreement, Waiver and General Release Agreement between Lorry J. Stensrud and The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company on behalf of itself and Lincoln National Corporation, their affiliates and subsidiaries, dated July 7, 2003 12 Historical Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges 21 List of Subsidiaries of LNC 31 Additional Exhibit - Section 302 Certifications 32 Additional Exhibit - Section 906 Certifications (b) Reports on Form 8-K During the three months ended June 30, 2003, the following Current Reports on Form 8-K were filed or furnished by LNC: 1. Form 8-K dated May 9, 2003 under item 9 furnishing the Statistical Supplement for the quarter ended March 31, 2003. 2. Form 8-K dated June 6, 2003 under Item 5 containing a press release dated June 6, 2003, announcing the combination of life and annuity businesses into a single operating unit and related matters. SIGNATURE PAGE Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. LINCOLN NATIONAL CORPORATION By /S/ Richard C. Vaughan ---------------------- Richard C. Vaughan, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer By /S/ Casey J. Trumble ---------------------- Casey J. Trumble, Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer Date August 8 , 2003 LINCOLN NATIONAL CORPORATION Exhibit Index for the Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended June 30, 2003 Exhibit Number Description Page Number - -------------- ----------- ----------- 10 (a) Agreement, Waiver and General Release - Lorry J. Stensrud 67 12 Historical Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges 76 21 List of Subsidiaries of LNC 31 Additional Exhibit - Section 302 Certifications 77 32 Additional Exhibit - Section 906 Certifications 79 Note: This is an abbreviated version of the Lincoln National Corporation Form 10-Q. Copies of the exhibits (pages XX-XX) are not attached. Copies of these exhibits are available electronically at www.sec.gov or by writing to the Corporate Secretary at Lincoln National Corporation, Centre Square, 1500 Market Street, Suite 3900, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19102-2112