ScottsMiracle-Gro
SMG
#4222
Rank
โ‚น278.30 B
Marketcap
โ‚น4,780
Share price
-2.22%
Change (1 day)
-6.12%
Change (1 year)
The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company is an American multinational corporation that manufactures and sells consumer lawn, garden and pest control products.
Text size:
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)

( X ) ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15 (d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (FEE REQUIRED)

For the fiscal year ended September 30, 1996

OR

( ) TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (NO FEE REQUIRED)

For the transition period from to
---------------- --------------

Commission file number 1-11593
-------

The Scotts Company
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Ohio 31-1199481
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) (I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)

14111 Scottslawn Road, Marysville, Ohio 43041
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: 937-644-0011
------------
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of Each Class Name of Each Exchange On Which Registered
------------------- -----------------------------------------
9 7/8% Senior Subordinated Notes New York Stock Exchange
due August 1, 2004

Common Shares, Without Par Value (18,575,293
Common Shares outstanding at December 2, 1996) New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
----
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No
--- ---
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. (X)

The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the
registrant at December 2, 1996 was $ 330,616,046.20.
--------------
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
PORTIONS OF THE REGISTRANT'S ANNUAL REPORT TO SHAREHOLDERS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 ARE INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO PARTS I, II AND IV
HEREOF. PORTIONS OF THE PROXY STATEMENT FOR REGISTRANT'S 1997 ANNUAL MEETING OF
SHAREHOLDERS TO BE HELD MARCH 12, 1997, ARE INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO PART
III HEREOF.

This report contains 304 pages of which this is Page 1. The Index to Exhibits
begins at page 92.
PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS.

The Scotts Company ("Scotts"), through its wholly-owned subsidiaries,
Hyponex Corporation ("Hyponex"), Scotts-Sierra Horticultural Products Company
("Sierra"), Republic Tool and Manufacturing Corp. ("Republic"), Scotts'
Miracle-Gro Products, Inc. and their subsidiaries (collectively, the
"Company"), is one of the oldest and most widely recognized manufacturers of
products used to grow and maintain landscapes: lawns, gardens and golf
courses. The Company's Scotts-Registered Trademark-and Turf
Builder-Registered Trademark- (for consumer lawn care),
Miracle-Gro-Registered Trademark- and Miracid-Registered Trademark- (for
garden care), ProTurf-Registered Trademark- (for professional turf care) and
Osmocote-Registered Trademark- (for consumer garden and professional
horticulture) brands command market-leading shares more than double those of
the next ranked competitors, in the referenced consumer or professional
subgroup.
The Company's long history of technical innovation, its reputation for
quality and service and its marketing tailored to the needs of
do-it-yourselfers and professionals have enabled the Company to maintain
leadership in its markets while delivering consistent growth in the Company's
net sales. Do-it-yourselfers and professionals purchase through different
distribution channels and have different information and product needs.
Accordingly, the Company has historically had two business groups, Consumer
and Professional, to serve its domestic markets, as well as an International
Group to serve its markets outside of North America. For fiscal 1997, the
Company has reorganized into six business groups comprised of Consumer Lawns,
Consumer Gardens, Organics, Professional and International Groups, plus an
Operations Group.

On May 19, 1995, pursuant to the Amended and Restated Agreement and Plan of
Merger, dated as of May 19, 1995, amending and restating the original Agreement
and Plan of Merger, dated as of January 26, 1995 (as so amended and restated,
the "Merger Agreement"), the Company acquired Stern's Miracle-Gro Products, Inc.
("Miracle-Gro Products"), Miracle-Gro Products Limited ("Miracle-Gro UK"),
Miracle-Gro Lawn Products, Inc. ("Miracle-Gro Lawn Products") and the assets of
Stern's Nurseries, Inc. ("Nurseries") (collectively, the "Miracle-Gro
Companies"). The acquisition was structured as a merger of Scotts' wholly-owned
subsidiary, ZYX Corporation ("Merger Sub") into Miracle-Gro Products (the
"Merger"), with Miracle-Gro Products surviving, followed by stock transfers of
all of the outstanding capital stock of Miracle-Gro UK and Miracle-Gro Lawn
Products to Miracle-Gro Products (the "Subsequent Stock Transfers") and an asset
transfer of all of the assets, but none of the liabilities, of Nurseries to
Miracle-Gro Products (the "Asset Transfer" and, collectively with the Merger and
the Subsequent Stock Transfers, the "Merger Transactions"). Following the
Merger Transactions, Miracle-Gro Products was merged into its wholly-owned
subsidiary, Scotts' Miracle-Gro Products, Inc., which is the ultimate surviving
corporation of the Merger Transactions ("Scotts' Miracle-Gro"). Scotts'
Miracle-Gro markets the leading brands of garden plant foods, Miracle-Gro-
Registered Trademark- and Miracid-Registered Trademark-.

By operation of the Merger, each share of capital stock of Merger Sub was
converted into one share of the voting common stock of Miracle-Gro Products, and
the outstanding capital stock of Miracle-Gro Products was converted into the
right to receive Scotts' Class A Convertible Preferred Stock (the "Convertible
Preferred Stock") and warrants to acquire common shares of Scotts (the
"Warrants"), as described below. As a result of the Merger Transactions, Scotts
became the owner of all of the outstanding shares of common stock of the
surviving corporation, Miracle-Gro Products, and its wholly-owned subsidiaries,
Miracle-Gro UK and Miracle-Gro Lawn Products.

Prior to the Merger Transactions, the Miracle-Gro Companies were privately
held by: Horace Hagedorn, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Miracle-Gro
Products, individually; members of the Hagedorn family through Hagedorn
Partnership, L.P. (the "Hagedorn Partnership"); Community Funds, Inc., a New
York not-for-profit corporation (the "Charity"), as a result of a charitable
donation by Mr. Hagedorn on May 1, 1995; and John Kenlon, the President of
Scotts' Miracle-Gro.

As consideration for the Merger Transactions, Mr. Hagedorn, the Hagedorn
Partnership, the Charity and Mr. Kenlon received, in the aggregate, $195,000,000
face amount of Convertible Preferred Stock, convertible at $19 per share
(subject to adjustment) into approximately 35% of the total voting power of
Scotts, and Warrants to purchase, at prices ranging from $21 to $29 per share,
an additional

Page 2
3,000,000 common shares of Scotts, which, if exercised, would enable them to
exercise, together with the Convertible Preferred Stock, approximately 42% of
the total voting power of Scotts.

CONSUMER BUSINESS GROUP

PRODUCTS

The Company's consumer products include lawn fertilizers and lawn
fertilizer/control combination products, garden and indoor plant care products,
garden tools, potting soils and other organic products, grass seed and lawn
spreaders.

CONSUMER LAWNS PRODUCTS. Among the Company's most important consumer
products are lawn fertilizers, such as Scotts Turf Builder-Registered
Trademark-, and combination fertilizer/control products, such as Scotts Turf
Builder Plus 2-Registered Trademark- and Scotts Turf Builder Plus
Halts-Registered Trademark-. Typically, these are patented, homogeneous,
controlled-release products which provide complete controlled feeding for
consumers' lawns for up to two months without the risk of damage to the lawn
presented by less expensive controlled and non-controlled-release products.
Some of the Company's products are specially formulated for geographical
differences and some, such as Bonus-Registered Trademark- S (to control weeds
in Southern grasses), are distributed to limited areas. The Company's lawn
fertilizer and combination products are sold in dry, granular form. In 1996,
a granular lawn food product, along with a combination weed and feed lawn
product, were sold by the Company under the Miracle-Gro-Registered Trademark-
name nationwide.

Management estimates that in fiscal 1996, the Company's share of the U.S.
do-it-yourself consumer lawn chemicals products market was approximately 51%
(includes Miracle-Gro lawn products), more than double that of the second
leading brand.

The Company sells numerous varieties and blends of high quality grass seed,
many of them proprietary, designed for different uses and geographies.
Management estimates that the Company's share of the U.S. consumer grass seed
market (includes PatchMaster-Registered Trademark- products) was approximately
32% in fiscal 1996.

Because the Company's granular lawn care products perform best when applied
evenly and accurately, the Company sells a line of spreaders specifically
manufactured and developed for use with its products. This line includes the
SpeedyGreen-Registered Trademark- and EasyGreen-Registered Trademark- rotary
spreaders, the PrecisionGreen-Registered Trademark- and AccuGreen-Registered
Trademark- drop spreaders, and the HandyGreen-Registered Trademark- hand-held
rotary spreader, all marketed under the Scotts-Registered Trademark- brand name.

Since the acquisition of Republic in November 1992, the Company has
continued to market both its line of Scotts-Registered Trademark- spreaders and
Republic's E-Z line of spreaders and to integrate the manufacture of its
spreaders through Republic. Management estimates that the Company's share of
the U.S. market for lawn spreaders and garden carts was approximately 56% in
fiscal 1996.

The Company has a licensing agreement in place with Union Tools, Inc.
("Union") under which Union, in return for the payment of royalties, is granted
the right to produce and market a line of garden tools bearing the Scotts
trademark. The Company also is a party to a licensing agreement with American
Lawn Mower Company ("American") under which American, in return for the payment
of royalties, is granted the right to produce and market a line of push-type
reel lawn mowers bearing the Scotts trademark. In management's estimation, the
Company did not have a material share of the markets for these products in
fiscal 1996.

CONSUMER GARDENS PRODUCTS. The Company sells a complete line of water
soluble fertilizers under the Miracle-Gro-Registered Trademark- brand name.
These products are primarily used for garden fertilizer application. The
Company also produces and sells a line of boxed Scotts-Registered Trademark-
Plant Foods, garden and landscape fertilizers, Osmocote-Registered Trademark-
controlled-release garden fertilizers, and hose-end feeders.

Page 3
Scotts' Miracle-Gro markets and distributes the leading line of water-
soluble plant foods. These products are designed to be dissolved in water,
creating a dilute nutrient solution which is poured over plants and rapidly
absorbed by their roots and leaves.

Miracle-Gro-Registered Trademark- All-Purpose Water-Soluble Plant Food is
the leading product in the Miracle-Gro line. Other water-soluble plant foods in
the product line include Miracid-Registered Trademark- for acid loving plants,
Miracle-Gro-Registered Trademark- for Roses, and Miracle-Gro-Registered
Trademark- for Tomatoes. Scotts' Miracle-Gro also sells a line of hose-end
applicators for water-soluble plant foods, through the Miracle-Gro No-Clog-
Registered Trademark- Garden and Lawn Feeder line, which allow consumers to
apply water-soluble fertilizers to large areas quickly and easily with no mixing
or measuring required. Scotts' Miracle-Gro also markets a line of products for
houseplant use including Liquid Miracle-Gro-Registered Trademark-, African
Violet Food, Plant Food Spikes, Leaf Shine and Orchid Food (new in 1996).

Management estimates that in fiscal 1996, the Company's share of the garden
and indoor plant foods market was approximately 59% (includes Miracle-Gro
products).

ORGANICS PRODUCTS. The Company sells a broad line of organic products
under the Scotts-Registered Trademark-, Hyponex-Registered Trademark-, Peters-
Registered Trademark- Professional-Registered Trademark- and other labels,
including retail potting soils, topsoil, humus, peat, manures, soil
conditioners, bark and mulches. Management estimates that the Company's fiscal
1996 U.S. market share was approximately 45% in potting soils and other consumer
organic products.

CONSUMER BUSINESS GROUP STRATEGY

The Company believes that it has achieved its leading position in the do-
it-yourself lawn care and garden markets on the basis of its strong marketing
programs, its sophisticated technology, the superior quality and value of its
products, and the service it provides its customers. The Company seeks to
maintain and expand its market position by emphasizing these qualities and
taking advantage of the name and reputation of its many strong brands such as
Scotts-Registered Trademark-, Miracle-Gro-Registered Trademark- and Hyponex-
Registered Trademark-. Through its Scotts-Registered Trademark-, Peters-
Registered Trademark- and Hyponex-Registered Trademark- labels, the Company has
also focused on increasing sales of its higher margin organic products such as
potting soils.

The Company is the market leader in the lawn, garden and organics segments
of the growing lawn and garden market. Population trends indicate that the
consumer segment age of 40 and older, who represent the largest group of lawn
and garden product users, will grow by 30% from 1995 to 2010, a growth rate more
than twice that of the total population.

Drawing upon its strong research and development capabilities, the
Company intends to continue to develop and introduce new and innovative lawn
and garden products. The Company believes that its ability to introduce
successful new consumer products has been a key element in the Company's
growth. New consumer products in recent years include:
PatchMaster-Registered Trademark- (1992), a unique lawn repair product
containing seed, Scotts Starter-Registered Trademark-fertilizer and mulch; a
Poly-S-Registered Trademark- lawn fertilizer line(1993), which utilizes
Scotts proprietary controlled-release technology to provide a lower priced
product offering versus the premium Turf Builder-Registered Trademark- line;
new AccuGreen-Registered Trademark- and Speedy Green-Registered Trademark-
(1994) spreaders which are shipped and sold fully assembled; Scotts planting
soils (1994), a line of ready-to-use, value-added soils which help simplify
the do-it-yourself gardener's task and deliver superior growing performance;
Miracle-Gro-Registered Trademark- Quick Start, a liquid starter solution for
newly planted or young plants; GRUBEX-TM- (1995), providing season-long lawn
protection against grubs; YardAll-TM- (1995), an extra large lawn and garden
cart; flat-bottom, stand-up bags (1995) for soil products, which improve
merchandising for retail customers; the redesigned HandyGreen-Registered
Trademark- II (1996), a hand-held rotary spreader with an arm support;
Vegi-Gro-TM-(1996), a soil product specially formulated to grow larger
vegetables; and two new grass seed products, Mirage-TM- and Spring-Up-TM-,
grass seed blends for rapid seeding in the spring. In 1997, the Company
plans to introduce a new GRUBEX-TM- product, which provides lawn fertilizer
and season-long grub control in one application.

The Company also seeks to capitalize upon the competitive advantages
stemming from its position as the leading nationwide supplier of a full line of
consumer lawn and garden products. The

Page 4
Company believes that this gives it an advantage in selling to larger
retailers, who value the efficiency of dealing with a limited number of
suppliers.

The Company has developed a program to take advantage of Hyponex's
composting expertise and the increasing concern about landfill capacity by
entering into agreements with municipalities and waste haulers to compost yard
waste. The Company now has twelve compost facilities. In addition to service
fees, the Company substitutes the resulting compost for a portion of the raw
materials in Hyponex and other Company products.

MARKETING AND PROMOTION

The Company employs a 79-person direct sales force and numerous
distributors for its consumer lawn products to cover over 20,000 retail outlets
and headquarters of national, regional and local chains. For fiscal 1997, a
separate sales force has been established for the newly formed Organics business
group. For fiscal 1997, some of the Company's direct sales personnel will
supervise in-store retail merchandisers. The Company also plans to employ over
250 seasonal part-time merchandisers and in-store weekend counselors, in
connection with the Company's increased emphasis on in-store retail
merchandising. Most retail sales of the Company's lawn and garden products
occur on weekends during the months of early spring and summer. Most of the
Company's salespeople have college degrees and prior sales experience. In recent
years, the percentage of sales to mass merchandisers and home improvement
centers has increased. The top ten accounts (which include three buying groups
of independent retailers) represented 70% of the Consumer Business Group sales
in fiscal 1995 and 72% in 1996.

The Company continues to support its independent retailers. The Company
has developed a special line of products, marketed under the Lawn Pro-Registered
Trademark- name, which is sold by independent retailers. These products include
the 4-Step-TM- program, introduced in 1984, which encourages consumers to
purchase four products at one time (fertilizer plus crabgrass preventer,
fertilizer plus weed control, fertilizer plus insect control and a special
fertilizer for Fall application). The Company promotes the 4-Step-TM- program
as providing consumers with all their annual lawn care needs for, on average,
less than one-third of what a lawn care service would cost. The Company
believes the Lawn Pro-Registered Trademark- line has helped the Company maintain
its business with the independent retailers in the face of increasing
competition from mass merchandisers.

The Company supports its sales efforts with extensive advertising and
promotional programs. Because of the importance of the Spring sales season in
the marketing of consumer lawn and garden products, the Company focuses its
consumer promotional efforts on this period. Through advertising and other
promotional efforts, the Company seeks to encourage consumers to make the bulk
of their lawn and garden purchases in the early Spring. The Company believes
that its early season promotions moderate the risk to its consumer sales which
may result from bad weekend weather.

In 1995, the Company introduced a promotional allowance to retailers
designed to provide retailers with the ability to customize and differentiate
promotions of Scotts products. Also in 1995, the Company expanded a marketing
program originally begun in 1993, which provided incentives to retailers to
purchase a portion of their 1995 calendar fourth quarter and 1996 fertilizer
product requirements early, including extended payment terms consistent with the
anticipated pattern of sales to consumers. Please see the discussion in the
section of Scotts' Annual Report to Shareholders for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 1996 entitled "MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS -- Results of Operations --
Fiscal 1995 compared with fiscal 1994." The Company and retailers have
viewed these types of programs as important to the production, distribution
and marketing of these seasonal products. To improve trade margins and reduce
promotional costs for fiscal 1997, the Company has decided to replace the
pre-season incentive programs to retailers with more efficient promotional
allowances, increased consumer advertising and in-store merchandising support
in furtherance of the Company's new "pull" advertising strategy. Please see
the discussion in the section of Scotts' Annual Report to Shareholders for
the fiscal year ended

Page 5
September 30, 1996 entitled "MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS -- Outlook for 1997."

The fiscal 1997 marketing strategies for the Consumer Lawns Group are to
make additional efforts to improve Scotts' relationship with consumers,
including: carefully directed consumer research, to increase understanding
of its markets and the needs of consumers; substantially increased media
advertising; simplification of the product line; improvements in processing
and formulations of key lawn fertilizer items, to make them more effective
and easier to use; and increased use of retail merchandisers to enhance
communications with consumers at the point of sale. The fiscal 1997
marketing strategy for the Consumer Gardens Group is to consolidate certain
package sizes in the Miracle-Gro-Registered Trademark- and Scotts-Registered
Trademark-ornamental fertilizers product lines, implement packaging
improvements, continue cost-reduction and quality enhancement efforts
throughout all product lines, increase use of national network television
advertising, and use Scotts' Miracle-Gro's sales and distribution network for
Scotts-Registered Trademark-garden products. The strategy for the Organics
Group is to become the industry's lowest cost producer and to develop
national marketing programs, as the industry's only national competitor in
this industry class.

An important part of the Company's sales effort is its national toll-free
consumer hotline, on which its "lawn consultants" answer questions about the
Company's products and give general lawn care advice to consumers. The
Company's lawn consultants responded to approximately 440,000 telephone and
written inquiries in fiscal 1996 and have handled over 3,340,000 calls since the
inception of the consumer hotline in 1972.

Backing up the Company's marketing effort is its well-known "No Quibble"
guarantee, instituted in 1958, which promises consumers a full refund if for any
reason they are not satisfied with the results after using the Company's
products. Refunds under this guarantee have consistently amounted to less than
0.3% of net sales on an annual basis.

Consumer garden products are sold by a 14-person sales force to a network
of hardware and lawn and garden wholesale distributors, with certain sales made
directly to some retailers. The percentage of sales to mass merchandisers,
warehouse-type clubs and large buying groups has increased in recent years.

COMPETITION

The consumer lawn and garden market is highly competitive. The most
significant competitors for the consumer lawn care business are lawn care
service companies. At least one of these, Tru Green Company, which also owns
the ChemLawn-Registered Trademark- lawn care service business, operates
nationally and is significantly larger than the Company. In the do-it-yourself
segment, the Company's products compete primarily against regional products and
private label products produced by various suppliers and sold by such companies
as Kmart Corporation. These products compete across the entire range of the
Company's product line. In addition, certain of the Company's products compete
against branded fertilizers, pesticides and combination products marketed by
such companies as Monsanto Company (Ortho-Registered Trademark- and Greensweep-
Registered Trademark-), Lebanon Chemical Corp. (Greenview-Registered
Trademark-), United Industries Corporation (Peters-Registered Trademark- water
soluble fertilizers for the consumer market) and IMC Vigoro.

Most competitors, with the exception of lawn care service companies,
sell their products at prices lower than those of the Company. The Company
competes primarily on the basis of its strong brand names, consumer
advertising campaigns, quality, value, service and technological innovation.
The Company's competitive position is also supported by its national sales
force and its unconditional guarantee. There can be no assurance, however,
that additional competition from new or existing competitors will not erode
the Company's share of the consumer market or its profit margins. Home
Depot, one of the Company's large retail customers, has established a program
to feature Vigoro-Registered Trademark- brand lawn fertilizers. Home Depot
will also continue to feature Scotts-Registered Trademark- lawn fertilizer
products but a number of regional brands will no longer be offered at the
Home Depot stores. As of the date of this report, the

Page 6
Company is not able to determine the impact, if any, which the Vigoro program
will have on sales of Scotts-Registered Trademark- brand lawn fertilizers in
Home Depot stores.

The Company's lower-margin organics business faces primarily regional
competition, reflecting different soil conditions, raw materials and usage
patterns around the country. Customers require short lead-time deliveries, with
very high on-time and complete-fill rates.

BACKLOG

The majority of annual consumer product orders (other than Organics
products which are normally ordered in season on an "as needed" basis) are
received from retailers during the months of October through April and are
shipped during the months of January through April. As of December 2, 1996,
orders on hand for retailers totaled approximately $70 million compared to
approximately $62 million on the same date in 1995. All such orders are
expected to be filled in fiscal 1997.

PROFESSIONAL BUSINESS GROUP

THE MARKET

The Company sells its professional products to golf courses, commercial
nurseries and greenhouses, schools and sportsfields, multi-family housing
complexes, business and industrial sites, lawn and landscape services and
specialty crop growers. The Professional Group's two core businesses are
ProTurf-Registered Trademark-, the professionally managed turf market, and
Horticulture, the nursery and greenhouse markets. In 1996, the Professional
Business Group served such high profile golf courses as Augusta National
(Georgia), Cypress Point and Pebble Beach (California), Desert Mountain
(Arizona), Muirfield Village Golf Club (Ohio), Oakmont Country Club
(Pennsylvania), Colonial Country Club (Texas) and Medinah Country Club
(Illinois). Sports complexes such as Fenway Park, Camden Yard, Wrigley Field,
Yankee Stadium and the Rose Bowl are professional customers, as are major
commercial nursery/greenhouse operations such as Monrovia, Hines and Imperial.

Golf courses and highly visible turf areas accounted for approximately 54%
of the Company's professional sales in fiscal 1996. During 1996, the Company
sold products to approximately 53% of the over 14,500 golf courses in North
America, including 83 of GOLF DIGEST's top 100 U.S. courses. Management
estimates, based on an independent bi-annual market survey and other information
available to the Company, that the Company's share of the North American golf
course turf maintenance market was approximately 20% in 1996.

According to the National Golf Foundation, approximately 250 new golf
courses have been constructed annually during the last three years. Management
believes that the increase in the number of courses, the concentration of the
growth in the West/South with a longer growing/maintenance season, the
increasing playing time requiring more course maintenance and the trend toward
more highly maintained courses should contribute to sales growth in the golf
course business.

Horticulture sales accounted for approximately 46% of the Company's
professional sales in fiscal 1996. The Company sold products to thousands of
nursery, greenhouse and specialty crop growers through a network of over 100
horticultural distributors. The Company estimates that its leading share of the
North American horticultural segment was approximately 35% in 1996.

Management believes the increasing acceptance of controlled-release
fertilizers in horticultural/ agricultural applications due to performance
advantages, labor savings and water quality concerns should contribute to sales
growth in the horticulture market. However, other products and technologies may
also make inroads into this market as well as the turf market.

In January 1994, a new business unit under the ProGrow-Registered
Trademark-name was created to better serve the large, but highly fragmented,
lawn/landscape service market, in addition to schools and sportsfields,
multi-family housing complexes and business/industrial sites. Effective
October 1996, management

Page 7
consolidated this business unit within one division called ProTurf-Registered
Trademark-, to focus on direct sales to the professionally managed turf
market, including golf, sod and athletic fields.

PRODUCTS

The Company's professional products, marketed under such brand names as
ProTurf-Registered Trademark-, Osmocote-Registered Trademark-, Peters-
Registered Trademark-, Metro-Mix-Registered Trademark- and Terra-Lite-Registered
Trademark-, include a broad line of sophisticated controlled-release
fertilizers, water soluble fertilizers, control products (herbicides,
insecticides, fungicides and growth regulators), wetting agents, organic
products, grass seed and application devices. The fertilizer lines utilize a
range of proprietary controlled-release fertilizer technologies, including
Polyform-Registered Trademark-, Triaform-Registered Trademark-, Poly-S-
Registered Trademark-, Osmocote-Registered Trademark- and ScottKote-Registered
Trademark-, and proprietary water soluble fertilizer technologies, including
Peters-Registered Trademark- and Peters Excel-Registered Trademark-. The
Company applies these technologies to meet a wide range of professional customer
needs, ranging from quick release greenhouse fertilizers to controlled-release
fairway/greens fertilizers to extended release nursery fertilizers that last up
to a year or more.

The Company works very closely with basic pesticide manufacturers to secure
access to, and if possible, exclusive positions on, advanced control chemistry
which can be formulated on granular carriers, including fertilizers, or liquid
application. In 1996, at least seven professional products featured exclusive
control technologies, including such products as the TGR-Registered Trademark-
growth regulator line, Turplex-Registered Trademark- bioinsecticide, Prograss-
Registered Trademark- and Confront-Registered Trademark- herbicides, and
Talstar-Registered Trademark- and Astro-Registered Trademark- insecticides and
miticides. Liquid-applied fertilizers and control products numbered 38 in 1996.
Application devices include both rotary and drop action spreaders. Over 20
proprietary grass seed varieties are part of the professional line. The Sierra
acquisition in December 1993 added an established line of soil-less mixes in
which controlled-release and water soluble fertilizers, wetting agents and
control products can be incorporated to customize potting media for nurseries
and greenhouses.

BUSINESS STRATEGY

The Company's Professional Business Group focuses its sales efforts on the
middle and high end of the professional market and generally does not compete
for sales of commodity products. Demand for the Company's professional products
is primarily driven by product quality, performance and technical support. The
Company seeks to meet these needs with a range of sophisticated, specialized
products that are sold by a professional, agronomically-trained sales force.

A primary focus of the Professional Business Group's strategy is to provide
innovative high value new products to its professional customers. Products
introduced since 1990 accounted for over 45% of the Professional Business
Group's net sales in fiscal 1996.

The Company intends to take advantage of its strong position in the golf
course segment to increase sales of Sierra-Registered Trademark- products to
those users, and, conversely, to expand the distribution of Scotts-Registered
Trademark- nursery products in the commercial horticultural segment in which
Sierra has a strong position.

The Professional Business Group also is working to increase market coverage
by focusing on various professional market niches. In 1965, the Company
established its first specialized professional sales force, focusing on golf
courses. Since 1985, it has established separate sales forces and/or sales
managers for sports fields, golf course architects and construction companies,
and the international market of the Professional Business Group. In 1992, the
Company introduced a fairway application service for golf courses. This service
has been expanded and is now available in sixteen markets. In January 1995,
Scotts entered into a licensing agreement with a lawn care service company,
Emerald Green Lawn Service ("Emerald Green"), which allows Emerald Green to use
the Scotts name and logo in its marketing efforts. Emerald Green applies Scotts
products exclusively. Scotts has a 25% equity interest in Emerald Green.

Page 8
MARKETING AND PROMOTION

The Professional Business Group's sales force consists of 112 territory
managers. Many territory managers are experienced former golf course
superintendents or nursery managers and most have degrees in agronomy,
horticulture or similar disciplines. Territory managers work closely with golf
course and sports field superintendents, turf and nursery managers, and other
landscape professionals. In addition to marketing the Company's products, the
Company's territory managers provide consultation, testing services, and advice
regarding maintenance practices, including individualized comprehensive programs
incorporating various products for use at specified times throughout the year.
The professional grower business is served primarily through an extensive
network of distributors, all with substantial experience in the horticulture
market, with territory managers spending the majority of their time with
growers.

To reach potential purchasers, the Company uses trade advertising and
direct mail, publishes newsletters, and sponsors seminars throughout the
country. In addition, the Company maintains a special toll-free hotline for its
professional customers. The professional customer service department responded
to over 45,000 telephone inquiries in fiscal 1996.

COMPETITION

In the professional turf and nursery market, the Company faces a broad
range of competition from numerous companies ranging in size from multi-national
chemical and fertilizer companies such as Monsanto and DowElanco Company, to
smaller specialized companies such as Lesco, Inc. and Lebanon Chemical Corp., to
local fertilizer manufacturers and blenders. Portions of this market are served
by large agricultural fertilizer companies, while other segments are served by
specialized, research-oriented companies. In certain areas of the country,
particularly Florida, a number of companies have begun to offer turf care
services, including product application, to golf courses. In addition, the
higher margins available for sophisticated products to treat high value crops
continue to attract large and small chemical producers and formulators, some of
which have larger financial resources and research departments than the Company.
Also, the influence of mass merchandisers, with significant buying power, has
increased. While the Company believes that its reputation, turf and ornamental
market focus, expertise in product development and professional sales force
should enable it to continue to maintain and build its share of the
professional market, there can be no assurance that the Company's market
share or margins will not continue to be eroded in the future by new or
existing competitors.

BACKLOG

A large portion of professional product orders are received during the
months of August through November and are filled during the months of September
through November. As of December 2, 1996, orders on hand from professional
customers totaled approximately $10.4 million compared with $10.1 million on the
same date in 1995. All such orders are expected to be filled in fiscal 1997.

INTERNATIONAL

THE MARKET

The Company sells its products to both consumer and professional users in
over sixty-five countries. Growth potential exists in both markets. The
Company has established business entities in many of the markets with
significant potential.

Consumer lawn and garden products are sold under the Scotts-Registered
Trademark- label in Australia, Canada, the European Union and New Zealand. In
addition, products bearing the Miracle-Gro-Registered Trademark- trademark are
marketed in Canada, the Caribbean, Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom
(the "U.K."). The Company's Hyponex-Registered Trademark- line of products is
present in Japan as a result of a long-term agreement with Hyponex Japan
Corporation, Ltd., an unaffiliated entity.

Page 9
Professional markets include both the horticulture and turf industries.
The Company markets professional products in Australia, Canada, the Caribbean,
European Union, Japan, Latin America, Mexico, the Middle East, New Zealand, and
South East Asia. Horticultural products mainly carry the Scotts-Registered
Trademark-, Sierra-Registered Trademark-, Peters-Registered Trademark- and
Osmocote-Registered Trademark- labels. Turf products primarily use the Scotts-
Registered Trademark- trademark.

On December 31, 1994, the Garden and Professional Products Division of
Zeneca Garden Care was sold to Miracle Garden Care Limited ("Miracle Garden
Care"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Miracle Holdings Limited ("Miracle
Holdings"). Miracle Holdings was established by Miracle-Gro UK and certain
institutional investors, each of which is an affiliate of either Charterhouse
plc or Advent International plc, for the purpose of pursuing the lawn and garden
care business in the U.K. and elsewhere. Miracle-Gro UK received an approximate
32.3% equity interest in Miracle Holdings in return for its transfer to Miracle
Holdings of Miracle-Gro's UK and Ireland business and the grant to Miracle
Garden Care, pursuant to a license agreement, of rights to certain trademarks.
In addition, Miracle-Gro UK was granted certain rights to buy out substantially
all of the equity stakes of the other investors in Miracle Holdings at certain
future times. The option to buy out the other investors in Miracle Holdings now
extends to the Company. In November 1996, the Company executed a letter of
intent for the purchase of the other investors' interests in Miracle Holdings.

Miracle Garden Care has leading positions in the U.K. in a number of lawn
and garden market categories. Products are sold by a direct sales force to do-
it-yourself and gardening retailers.

BUSINESS STRATEGY

An increasing portion of the Company's sales and earnings is derived from
customers in foreign countries. The Company's managers travel abroad regularly
to visit its facilities, distributors and customers. The Company's own
employees manage its affairs in Europe, Australia, Malaysia, Mexico and the
Caribbean. The Company plans to expand its international business in both the
consumer and professional markets. The Company believes that the technology,
quality and value that are widely associated with its brands domestically can be
transferred to the global market place. The Company intends to continue to
market internationally through both direct sales and distributor arrangements.

Any significant changes in international economic conditions,
expropriations, changes in taxation and regulation by United States and/or
foreign governments could have a substantial effect upon the international
business of the Company. Management believes, however, that these risks are not
unreasonable in view of the opportunities for profit and growth available in
foreign markets. The Company's international earnings and cash flows are
subject to variations in currency exchange rates, which derive from sales and
purchases of the Company's products made in foreign currencies. In order to
minimize the impact of adverse exchange rate movements, the Company has
developed a program to manage and mitigate this risk. The risk management
program is designed to minimize impact on the cash value of the Company's
foreign currency payables and receivables. The Company continues to use forward
foreign exchange contracts and purchase currency options to lessen this risk.

COMPETITION

The Company's international consumer business faces strong competition in
the garden center market, particularly in Australia, Canada and the U.K.
Competitors in Australia include Chisso-Asahi, Phostrogen and Haifa Chemicals
Israel. Competitors in the U.K. include Levington, Solaris, Phostrogen, PBI and
various local companies. Competitors in Canada include Nu-Gro, So-Green and IMC
Vigoro. The Company has historically responded to competition with superior
technology, excellent trade relationships, competitive prices, broad
distribution and strong advertising and promotional programs.

The international professional products market is very competitive,
particularly in the controlled-release and water soluble fertilizer segments.
Numerous United States and European companies are pursuing these segments
internationally, including Pursell Industries, Lesco, Lebanon Chemical Corp.,
IMC Vigoro, Noram, BASF, Norsk Hydro, Haifa Chemicals Israel, Kemira and private
label companies. Historically, the Company's response to competition in the
professional markets has been to adapt its

Page 10
technology to solve specific user needs which are identified by developing
close working relationships with key users.

Management believes the Company is well-positioned to obtain an increased
share of the international market. The Company has a broad, diversified product
line made up of value added fertilizers which can be targeted to market segments
of consumer, turf, horticulture and high value agricultural crops. Also, the
Company has the capability to sell worldwide through its extensive distributor
network. However, there can be no assurance that the Company's market share or
margins will not be eroded by new or existing competitors.

MATTERS RELATING TO THE COMPANY GENERALLY

PATENTS, TRADEMARKS AND LICENSES

The "Scotts-Registered Trademark-", "Miracle-Gro-Registered Trademark-" and
"Hyponex-Registered Trademark-" brand names and logos, as well as a number of
product trademarks, including "Turf Builder-Registered Trademark-", "Lawn Pro-
Registered Trademark-", "ProTurf-Registered Trademark-", "Osmocote-Registered
Trademark-" and "Peters-Registered Trademark-" are federally and internationally
registered and are considered material to the Company's business. The Company
regularly monitors its trademark registrations, which are generally effective
for ten years, so that it can renew those nearing expiration. In 1989, the
Company assigned rights to certain Hyponex-Registered Trademark- trademarks to
Hyponex Japan Corporation, Ltd., an unaffiliated entity. In December 1994,
Miracle-Gro licensed exclusive rights to certain Miracle-Gro trademarks in the
U.K. and Ireland to Miracle Garden Care for terms ranging from five to twenty
years. In July 1995, Sierra granted a non-exclusive license to Peters
Acquisition Corporation, now owned by United Industries, to use the Peters-
Registered Trademark- trademark in the United States consumer market. In
October 1996, Scotts became the exclusive licensee of the trademark Nutralene-
Registered Trademark-, in connection with the marketing and sale of products
containing this nitrogen fertilizer.

As of September 30, 1996, the Company held over 100 patents on processes,
compositions, grasses, and mechanical spreaders and has several additional
patent applications pending. Patent protection generally extends seventeen
years, and many of the Company's patents extend well into the next decade. The
Company also holds exclusive and nonexclusive patent licenses from certain
chemical suppliers permitting the use and sale of patented pesticides.

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

The Company has a long history of innovation, and its research and
development successes can be measured in terms of sales of new products and by
the Company's patents. Most of the Company's fertilizer products, many of its
grasses and many of its mechanical devices are covered by one or more of over
100 U.S. and foreign patents owned by the Company.

The Company maintains a premier research and development organization
headquartered in the Dwight G. Scott Research Center in Marysville, Ohio
("Scotts Research"). The Company also operates three research field stations
located in Florida, Texas and Oregon. These field stations facilitate
evaluation of products in a variety of climatic conditions, an integral part
of the Company's product development, quality assurance and competitive
product analysis programs. Research to develop new and improved application
devices is conducted at Republic's manufacturing facility in Carlsbad,
California. Taken together, the research and development effort maintains a
focus on superior agronomic performance for lawn, turf and horticultural
applications through products which are cost effective and easy to use. The
knowledge and concepts used to formulate products for the professional turf
and plant production markets are also used to provide similar results for the
do-it-yourself market. In addition to the Marysville R&D organization, Scotts
Europe, B.V. (Netherlands) maintains an R&D facility devoted to the
Osmocote-Registered Trademark-controlled-release fertilizer line produced in
Heerlen, The Netherlands.

Since its introduction of the first home lawn fertilizer in 1928, the
Company has used its research and development strengths to build the do-it-
yourself market. Technology continues to be a Company hallmark. The Company's
introduction of the TGR-Registered Trademark- line in 1987 to control POA ANNUA
on golf courses is

Page 11
an example.  In 1992, the Company introduced Poly-S-Registered Trademark-, a
patented proprietary controlled-release fertilizer technology. In 1993,
ScottKote-Registered Trademark-, another controlled-release technology
primarily for the nursery market, was introduced. In addition, the Company
has modified its Marysville facility to utilize a new, patented production
process which is expected to reduce costs and improve product quality, while
increasing production capacity. (See "Production Facilities.") Since the
Hyponex acquisition in 1988, the Company's research and development
organization has worked to improve the quality and reduce the production cost
of branded organic products, in particular potting soils. One of the results
of this effort was the introduction, in 1994, of a line of value-added,
premium quality potting soils and planting mixes under the Scotts-Registered
Trademark- brand.

Through the acquisition of Sierra, Scotts sought to obtain patents for
technological advancements in water soluble fertilizers. In 1996, Scotts
secured a patent on the use of urea phosphate in water soluble fertilizers used
as the basis for the Peters Excel-Registered Trademark- brand of fertilizers,
having previously obtained a solution and method patent for such product line.
Also during fiscal 1996, the Company installed a dedicated turfgrass genetic
engineering laboratory in its existing Scotts Research facility, to research and
potentially develop turfgrass varieties with improved characteristics such as
resistance to disease, insects and herbicides. Also, research in fiscal 1996
focused on improving the quality and durability of the Company's consumer lawn
fertilizer packaging. The Company plans to phase in plastic packaging for all
consumer lawn products to be shipped in fiscal years 1997 and 1998.

Research has also been focused on durability, precision, and reduced
production costs of the Republic-produced spreaders. Recently, Republic
completely redesigned the major products within the Company's consumer spreader
line so that they are now completely preassembled and are distributed and
displayed using innovative packaging.

Sierra pioneered the use of controlled-release fertilizers for the
horticultural markets with the introduction of "Osmocote" in the 1960's. This
polymer-encapsulated technology has achieved a large share of the horticultural
markets due to its ability to meet the strict performance requirements of
professional growers. Scotts' and Sierra's research and development efforts
have been fully integrated and are focused on cost reduction and product/process
innovation.

During fiscal 1996, the Company developed new products in several branded
lines including Scotts-Registered Trademark- professional turf products;
Osmocote-Registered Trademark- controlled-release fertilizer; Miracle-Gro-
Registered Trademark- granular lawn food products; Scotts-Registered Trademark-
spreaders; Vegi-Gro-TM- potting soil; and PatchMaster-Registered Trademark-
flowering seed/fertilizer mix.

Combined Company research and development expenses were approximately $10.6
million (1.4% of net sales) for 1996 including environmental and regulatory
expenses. This compares to $10.4 million (1.5% of net sales) and $11.0 million
(1.5% of net sales) for 1994 and 1995, respectively.

PRODUCTION FACILITIES

The manufacturing plants for consumer and professional fertilizer products
marketed under the Scotts-Registered Trademark- label are located in Marysville,
Ohio. In 1995, a new facility opened for producing Poly-S-Registered
Trademark-, a proprietary controlled-release fertilizer. Continued demand
for "Turf Builder-Registered Trademark-" products resulted in the Company
developing the capability to expand operations of these product lines from
five days per week operations to continuous operation if necessary during
peak demand periods. The Company currently operates its plants five days per
week. The Sierra-Registered Trademark- controlled-release fertilizers are
produced in Charleston, South Carolina, Milpitas, California and Heerlen, The
Netherlands. At the Heerlen facility, expansion has been completed to permit
the blending of products which utilize both Scotts and Sierra proprietary
technology. The Company's Taylor Seed Packaging Plant, located on a separate
site in Marysville, was sold in November 1996, and seed blending and
packaging outsourced to various packaging companies located on the West Coast
near seed growers. Hyponex-Registered Trademark- organic products are
processed and packaged in over 22 locations throughout the United States.
The Company's lawn spreaders are produced at the Republic facility in
Carlsbad, California. Peters-Registered Trademark- water-soluble fertilizers
are produced in Allentown, Pennsylvania.

Page 12
With the sale of the Peters-Registered Trademark- consumer water-soluble
fertilizer ("CWSF") business in 1995, the Allentown facility has produced
CWSF products for the buyer under a long-term supply agreement. On July 27,
1995, the Company entered into a Long-Term Supply Agreement (the "Agreement")
with Peters Acquisition Co. ("PAC"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Alljack &
Company and Celex Corporation ("Alljack"). Pursuant to a subsequent stock and
asset sale, PAC is now owned by individuals associated with United Industries
Corporation ("United"). The initial term of the Agreement is two years
(beginning August 27, 1995 and ending August 26, 1997). The term has been
extended until August 26, 2000, and thereafter may be extended for one year
terms by mutual agreement. The Agreement required PAC to purchase from the
Company its entire requirements of Peters-Registered Trademark- CWSF products
until September 30, 1996, at a price based upon a negotiated formula which
applies during the initial term and any renewals. Since September 30, 1996,
PAC has had the authority to purchase quantities as desired and to develop
independent sources of supply, as required by the Federal Trade Commission.
United has given notice that it will likely make no purchases though
September 30, 1997.

Resin used for producing Osmocote-Registered Trademark- controlled-release
fertilizer is manufactured at Sierra Sunpol Resins, a joint venture company
which is 97% owned by Sierra. The Company operates twelve composting facilities
where yard waste (grass clippings, leaves, and twigs) is converted to raw
materials for the Company's organic products. Operations at these composting
facilities have been integrated with the Company's 22 organics facilities.

The Company's fertilizer processing and packaging facilities operate seven
days per week for three shifts, during peak production periods, generally from
October through May for Scotts' production. At other times, they operate from
five to seven days per week for three shifts. Production schedules at Sierra's
facilities vary to meet demand. Steps continue to integrate product
manufacturing between the Scotts and Sierra manufacturing locations.

Management believes that each of its facilities is well-maintained and
suitable for its purpose.

CAPITAL EXPENDITURES

The Company's Marysville facilities were substantially modified during
fiscal 1992 and 1993. The Company replaced one of the existing fertilizer
production lines with a line utilizing a new, patented process which it
developed. In addition, the Company erected a new physical-blend facility and
added equipment to apply polymer coating to fertilizer materials.

During 1994, approximately $13 million was spent to erect a new Poly-S-
Registered Trademark- fertilizer plant, an investment made necessary by strong
previously forecasted demand. Actual demand was approximately 10% below
forecast for 1995, and approximately 25% below forecast for 1996. Management
attributes the decline to the scaling back of low margin product lines, the
effects of greater than expected industry competition, and lower than expected
demand for Poly-S-Registered Trademark- products. Additionally, in 1995,
approximately $4.0 million was spent on improvements to Sierra plant facilities.
During 1995 and 1996, approximately $4.0 million was spent to condition, through
temperature and humidity control, two of the Company's major production lines.

Capital expenditures totaled $23.6 million and $18.2 million for the fiscal
years ended September 30, 1995 and 1996, respectively. The Company expects that
capital expenditures during fiscal 1997 will total approximately $20 million.
The Company is evaluating expansion of its Marysville distribution facility,
which could result in additional capital expenditures of up to $10 million.

PURCHASING

The key ingredients in the Company's fertilizer and control products are
various commodity and specialty chemicals including vermiculite, phosphates,
urea, potash, herbicides, insecticides and fungicides. The Company obtains its
raw materials from various sources, which the Company presently considers to be
adequate. No one source is considered to be essential to any of the Company's

Page 13
Consumer, Professional or International Business Groups, or to its business as a
whole. The Company has never experienced a significant interruption of supply.

Raw materials for Scotts' Miracle-Gro include phosphates, urea and potash.
The Company considers its sources of supply for these materials to be adequate.
All of the products sold by Scotts' Miracle-Gro (other than those produced by
Miracle Garden Care) are produced under contract by independent fertilizer
blending and packaging companies.

Sierra purchases granular, homogeneous fertilizer substrates to be coated,
and the resins for coating. These resins are primarily supplied domestically by
Sierra SunPol Resins, a 97%-owned subsidiary of Sierra.

Sphagnum peat, peat humus, vermiculite, manure and bark constitute
Hyponex's most significant raw materials. At current production levels, the
Company estimates Hyponex's peat reserves to be sufficient for its near-term
needs in all locations. Bark products are obtained from sawmills and other wood
residue producers and manure is obtained from a variety of sources, such as feed
lots, race tracks and mushroom growers. The Company is currently substituting
composted yard waste for some organic raw materials and continues to expand this
practice.

Raw materials for Republic include various engineered resins and metals,
all of which are available from a variety of vendors.

DISTRIBUTION

The primary distribution centers for the Company's Scotts-Registered
Trademark-products are located near the Company's headquarters in central Ohio.
The Company's products are shipped by rail and truck. While the majority of
truck shipments are made by contract carriers, a portion is made by the
Company's own fleet of leased trucks. Inventories are also maintained in field
warehouses located in major markets.

The products of Scotts' Miracle-Gro are warehoused and shipped from five
contract packagers located throughout the country. These contract packagers
ship full truckloads of product via common carrier to lawn and garden
distributors.

Most of Hyponex's organic products have low sales value per unit of weight,
making freight costs significant to profitability. Therefore, Hyponex has
located all of its 22 plant/distribution locations near large metropolitan areas
in order to minimize shipping costs. Hyponex uses its own fleet of
approximately 70 trucks as well as contract haulers to transport its products
from plant/distribution points to retail customers. A small private trucking
fleet is maintained at the organic facilities for direct shipment of custom
orders to customers. Inventories are also maintained in field warehouses.

Sierra's products are produced at three fertilizer and two organic
manufacturing facilities located in the United States and one fertilizer
manufacturing facility located in Heerlen, The Netherlands. The majority of
shipments are via common carriers to nearby distributors' warehouses.

Republic-produced, Scotts-Registered Trademark- branded spreaders are
shipped via common carrier to regional warehouses serving the Company's retail
network. A majority of Republic's E-Z spreader line and its private label lines
are sold free-on-board (FOB) Carlsbad with transportation arranged by the
customer.

SIGNIFICANT CUSTOMERS

Kmart Corporation and Home Depot represented approximately 13.9% and 15.1%
respectively, of the Company's sales in fiscal 1996 and 3.0% and 8.8%,
respectively, of the Company's outstanding trade accounts receivable at
September 30, 1996, which reflects their significant position in the retail lawn
and garden market. The loss of either of these customers or a substantial
decrease in the amount of their purchases could have a material adverse effect
on the Company's business.

Page 14
EMPLOYEES

The Company's corporate culture is a blend of the history, heritage and
cultures of The O.M. Scott & Sons Company and the companies Hyponex, Sierra,
Miracle-Gro, and Republic, all of which were acquired over the past seven years.
The Company provides a comprehensive benefit program to all full-time
associates. As of September 30, 1996, the Company employed approximately 2,250
full-time year-round workers in the United States (includes all subsidiaries).
An additional 156 full-time employees (including 12 temporary employees) are
located outside the United States. As of September 30, 1996, full-time workers
averaged approximately nine years employment with the Company or its
predecessors. During peak production periods, the Company engages as many as
750 temporary employees in the United States. The Company's employees are not
unionized, with the exception of twenty-one of Sierra's employees at its
Milpitas facility, who are represented by the International Chemical Workers
Union.

ENVIRONMENTAL AND REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS

Federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to environmental
matters affect the Company in several ways. All products containing pesticides
must be registered with the United States Environmental Protection Agency
("United States EPA") (and in many cases, similar state and foreign agencies)
before they can be sold. The inability to obtain or the cancellation of any
such registration could have an adverse effect on the Company's business. The
severity of the effect would depend on which products were involved, whether
another product could be substituted and whether the Company's competitors were
similarly affected. The Company attempts to anticipate regulatory developments
and maintain registrations of, and access to, substitute chemicals, but there
can be no assurance that it will continue to be able to avoid or minimize these
risks. Fertilizer and organic products (including manures) are also subject to
state labeling regulations.

In addition, the use of certain pesticide and fertilizer products is
regulated by various local, state, federal and foreign environmental and public
health agencies. These regulations may include requirements that only certified
or professional users apply the product or that certain products be used only on
certain types of locations (such as "not for use on sod farms or golf courses"),
may require users to post notices on properties to which products have been or
will be applied, may require notification of individuals in the vicinity that
products will be applied in the future or may ban the use of certain
ingredients. The Company has been successful in complying with these
regulations. Compliance with such regulations and the obtaining of
registrations does not assure, however, that the Company's products will not
cause injury to the environment or to people under all circumstances.

State and federal authorities generally require Hyponex to obtain permits
(sometimes on an annual basis) in order to harvest peat and to discharge water
run-off or water pumped from peat deposits. The state permits typically specify
the condition in which the property must be left after the peat is fully
harvested, with the residual use typically being natural wetland habitats
combined with open water areas. Hyponex is generally required by these permits
to limit its harvesting and to restore the property consistent with the intended
residual use. In some locations, Hyponex has been required to create water
retention ponds to control the sediment content of discharged water.

In July 1990, the Philadelphia district of the Army Corps of Engineers
directed that peat harvesting operations be discontinued at Hyponex's Lafayette,
New Jersey facility, and the Company complied. In May 1992, the Department of
Justice in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, filed suit
seeking a permanent injunction against such harvesting at that facility and
civil penalties. The Philadelphia District of the Corps has taken the position
that peat harvesting activities there require a permit under Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act. If the Corps' position is upheld, it is possible that further
harvesting of peat from this facility would be prohibited. The Company is
defending this suit and is asserting a right to recover its economic losses
resulting from the government's actions. Management does not believe that the
outcome of this case will have a material adverse effect on the Company's
operations or its financial condition. Furthermore, management believes the
Company has

Page 15
sufficient raw material supplies available such that service to
customers will not be adversely affected by continued closure of this peat
harvesting operation.

State, federal and local agencies regulate the disposal, handling and
storage of waste and air and water discharges from Company facilities. During
fiscal 1996, the Company had approximately $885,000 in environmental capital
expenditures and $357,000 in other environmental expenses, compared with
approximately $538,000 in environmental capital expenditures and $332,000 in
other environmental expenses in fiscal 1995. The Company has budgeted $485,000
in environmental capital expenditures and $320,000 in other environmental
expenses for fiscal 1997.

In September 1991, the Company was identified by the Ohio Environmental
Protection Agency (the "Ohio EPA") as a Potentially Responsible Party ("PRP")
with respect to a site in Union County, Ohio (the "Hershberger site") that has
allegedly been contaminated by hazardous substances whose transportation,
treatment or disposal the Company allegedly arranged. Pursuant to a consent
order with the Ohio EPA, the Company, together with four other PRPs identified
to date, investigated the extent of contamination in the Hershberger site and
remediation methods. The results of the investigation were that the site
presents a low degree of risk and that the chemical compounds which contribute
to the risk are not compounds generally used by the Company. However, due to
the fact that the Company was originally named as a PRP, and due to the
potential joint and several liability of PRPs, the Company may choose to
participate in voluntary remediation efforts which might occur at the site.
Management believes that obligations incurred through such participation will
not have a significant adverse effect on the Company's results of operations or
financial condition.

On January 30, 1996, Sierra was served with a Complaint and Notice of
Opportunity for Hearing in which the US EPA, Region 9 alleged certain labeling
violations under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act
("FIFRA"). The fines proposed for such alleged violations total $785,000 and
are based upon the maximum allowable penalties. Sierra has vigorously defended
this action and raised numerous defenses. Based on provisions in FIFRA which
allow for reductions of fines for good faith efforts at compliance, management
estimates Sierra's liability to be no more than $200,000, which has been accrued
in the financial statements.

In addition, Sierra is a defendant in a private cost-recovery action
relating to the Novak Sanitary Landfill, located near Allentown, Pennsylvania.
By agreement with W.R. Grace-Conn., Sierra's liability is limited to a maximum
of $200,000 with respect to this site. The Company's management does not
believe that the outcome of this proceeding will have a material adverse effect
on its financial condition or results of operations.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES.

The Company has fee or leasehold interests in approximately sixty (60)
facilities.

The Company owns approximately 829 acres at its Marysville, Ohio
headquarters. It owns three research facilities in Apopka, Florida; Cleveland,
Texas; and Gervais, Oregon. The Company leases one fertilizer warehouse in
Ohio. Republic leases its twenty (20) acre spreader facility in Carlsbad,
California.

The Company's 22 organics bagging facilities are located nationwide in
nineteen states. Twenty are owned by the Company. Most facilities include
production lines, warehouses, offices and field processing areas.

The Company operates 12 composting facilities whose operations have been
integrated with the Company's existing organics bagging facilities. Five of
these sites are leased and are located in California, Indiana, Oregon and
Illinois. Five other sites are utilized through agreements with the
municipalities of Greensboro, North Carolina; Shreveport, Louisiana; Spokane,
Washington; Independent Hill, Virginia; and Balls Ford, Virginia. Two other
sites are located at existing bagging facilities in Wisconsin and California.

Page 16
The Company owns two Sierra manufacturing facilities in Fairfield,
California and Heerlen, The Netherlands. It leases three Sierra manufacturing
facilities in Allentown, Pennsylvania; Milpitas, California; and North
Charleston, South Carolina.

The Company leases the land upon which Scotts' Miracle-Gro headquarters is
located.

It is the opinion of the Company's management that its facilities are
adequate to serve their intended purposes at this time and that its property
leasing arrangements are stable. Please also see the discussion of the
Company's production facilities in "ITEM 1. BUSINESS - Matters Relating to the
Company Generally -- Production Facilities" above, which discussion is
incorporated herein by this reference.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

As noted in the discussion of "Environmental and Regulatory Considerations"
in ITEM 1. BUSINESS, the Company is defending a suit filed by the United States
Department of Justice which seeks civil penalties and a permanent injunction
against peat harvesting at Hyponex's Lafayette, New Jersey facility. The
Company has asserted a right to recover its economic losses resulting from the
government's actions. The Company has proposed a remediation plan, which is
currently being reviewed by the government. The Company also is involved in
several other environmental matters, as set forth above in "Environmental and
Regulatory Considerations". Management does not believe the outcome of these
matters will have a material adverse effect on the Company's operations or its
financial condition.

The Company is involved in other lawsuits and claims which arise in the
normal course of its business. In the opinion of management, these claims
individually and in the aggregate are not expected to result in an adverse
effect on the Company's financial position or operations.

During 1993 and 1994, Miracle-Gro Products discussed with Pursell
Industries, Inc. ("Pursell") the feasibility of forming a joint venture to
produce and market a line of slow-release lawn food, and in October 1993, signed
a non-binding "heads of agreement". On March 2, 1995, Pursell Industries, Inc.
("Pursell") instituted an action in the United States District Court for the
Northern District of Alabama, PURSELL INDUSTRIES, INC. V. STERN'S MIRACLE-GRO
PRODUCTS, INC., CV-95-C-0524-S (the "Alabama Action"), alleging, among other
things, breach of an alleged joint venture contract with Miracle-Gro Products,
fraud and breach of an alleged fiduciary duty owed Pursell. On December 18,
1995, Pursell filed an amended complaint in which Scotts was named as an
additional party defendant, and which made similar allegations against Scotts'
Miracle-Gro. The amended complaint also alleged that Scotts intentionally
interfered with the alleged business relationship between Pursell and
Miracle-Gro Products (now Scotts' Miracle-Gro); that Miracle-Gro Products
wrongfully disclosed to Scotts alleged trade secret information of Pursell; that
Scotts and Miracle-Gro Products engaged in allegedly false and misleading
advertising; and that Scotts and Miracle-Gro Products allegedly misappropriated
Pursell's trade dress. The Alabama Action seeks compensatory damages in excess
of $10 million, punitive damages of $20 million, treble damages and injunctive
relief. The Company continues to vigorously defend the Alabama Action.

On April 14, 1996, in response to communications from the Company that the
Company believed Pursell was infringing the Company's Poly-S patents, Pursell
instituted a second action in the United States District Court for the Northern
District of Alabama, PURSELL INDUSTRIES, INC. V. THE SCOTTS COMPANY, CV-96-AR-
0931-S (the "Patent Action"). Pursell seeks a declaratory judgment that the
Company's patents are unenforceable as to Pursell and alleges that the Company
has engaged in unfair competition by allegedly mis-marking its patents on
various products. The Company has vigorously defended this action and believes
its patents to be enforceable.

Pursell and the Company have been engaged in settlement negotiations since
October, 1996 in an effort to settle both the Alabama Action and the Patent
Action.

Page 17
ITEM 4.  SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.

There were no matters submitted to a vote of the security holders during
the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this Report.

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF REGISTRANT

The executive officers of Scotts, their positions and, as of December 16,
1996, their ages and years with Scotts (and its predecessors) are set forth
below.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEARS WITH
THE COMPANY
(AND ITS
NAME AGE POSITION(S) HELD PREDECESSORS)
---- --- ---------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Charles M. Berger 60 Chairman of the Board, President 4 months
and Chief Executive Officer
Horace Hagedorn 81 Vice Chairman of the Board 47
James Hagedorn 41 Director and Executive Vice 9
President, U.S. Business
Groups
Paul D. Yeager 58 Executive Vice President and 22
Chief Financial Officer
Ronald E. Justice 51 Senior Vice President, 1
Operations
Michael P. Kelty, Ph.D. 46 Senior Vice President, 17
Professional Business Group
James L. Rogula 62 Senior Vice President, 1
Consumer Lawns Group
John Kenlon 65 President, Consumer Gardens 26
Group
Joseph M. Petite 46 Senior Vice President, Organics 8
Business Group
L. Robert Stohler 55 Senior Vice President, 1
International
Rosemary L. Smith 49 Vice President, Human Resources 23
Christiane W. Schmenk 37 Secretary and Director of Legal Affairs 3

</TABLE>

Executive officers serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors (and
in the case of Mr. Berger, Mr. Horace Hagedorn, Mr. James Hagedorn, and Mr.
Kenlon, pursuant to employment agreements).

The business experience of each of the persons listed above during the past
five years is as follows:

Mr. Berger was elected Chairman of the Board, President, and Chief
Executive Officer of Scotts in August, 1996. Mr. Berger came to Scotts from H.
J. Heinz Company, where he served as Chairman, President and Chief Executive
Officer of Weight Watchers International, a Heinz affiliate, from November 1978
to September 1994. From October 1994 to August 1996, he was Chairman and CEO of
Heinz India Pvt. Ltd. (Bombay), and he served as Managing Director and CEO of
Heinz-Italy (Milan), the largest Heinz profit center in Europe, from August 1975
to November 1978. During his 32-year career at Heinz, he also held the
positions of General Manager, Marketing, for all Heinz U.S. grocery products;
Marketing Director for Heinz UK (London) and Director of Corporate Planning at
Heinz World Headquarters. He is also a former director of Miracle-Gro Products.

Page 18
Mr. Horace Hagedorn was named Vice Chairman of the Board and Director of
Scotts, and Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Scotts'
Miracle-Gro, in May 1995. Mr. Hagedorn founded Miracle-Gro Products in 1950 and
served as Chief Executive Officer of Miracle-Gro Products from 1985 until May
1995. Horace Hagedorn is the father of James Hagedorn. Mr. Hagedorn's
recognitions include the "Man of the Year" award from the National Lawn and
Garden Distributors Association, and the Distinguished Service Medal from the
Garden Writers of America Association. He was elected New York Regional Area
"Entrepreneur of the Year" in 1993.

Mr. James Hagedorn was named Executive Vice President, U.S. Business
Groups, in October 1996. From May 1995 to October 1996, he served as Senior
Vice President, Consumer Gardens Group, of Scotts. Mr. Hagedorn has also
been Executive Vice President of Scotts' Miracle-Gro since May 1995. He was
Executive Vice President of Miracle-Gro Products from 1989 until May 1995. He
was previously an officer and an F-16 pilot in the United States Air Force.
James Hagedorn is the son of Horace Hagedorn.

Mr. Yeager has been an Executive Vice President of Scotts since 1991 and a
Vice President and the Chief Financial Officer of Scotts and its predecessors
since 1980. He was first Assistant Comptroller and then Comptroller of Scotts'
predecessor from 1974 to 1980. Mr. Yeager will cease active employment with the
Company and resign as an executive officer of Scotts December 31, 1996.

Mr. Justice was named Senior Vice President, Operations, of Scotts in
July 1995. From 1992 to 1995, he was Vice President of Operations for
Continental Baking, a producer of bread and cake bakery products and a
subsidiary of Ralston Purina Company. From 1991 to 1992, he served as Vice
President of Engineering for Frito-Lay, a snack food producer and a subsidiary
of Pepsico, Inc. From 1988 to 1991, he was Vice President of Manufacturing for
Frito-Lay's Central Division.

Dr. Kelty was named Senior Vice President, Professional Business Group, of
Scotts in July 1995. Dr. Kelty had been Senior Vice President, Technology and
Operations, of Scotts from 1994 to July 1995. From 1988 to 1994, he served
first as Director, then as Vice President, of Research and Development of
Scotts. Prior to that, Dr. Kelty was the Director of Advanced Technology,
Research of Scotts, and from 1983 to 1987, he was Director, Chemical Technology
Development, of Scotts and its predecessors.

Mr. Rogula was named Senior Vice President, Consumer Lawns Group, of Scotts
in October 1996. He served as Senior Vice President, Consumer Business Group,
of Scotts from January 1995 to October 1996. From May 1990 until the time he
joined Scotts, he was President of The American Candy Company, a producer of
non-chocolate candies. From January 1990 to May 1990, he was an independent
business consultant.

Mr. Kenlon was named President, Consumer Gardens Group, of Scotts in
December 1996. He remains Chief Operating Officer and President of Scotts'
Miracle-Gro, positions held since May 1995. Mr. Kenlon was the President of
Miracle-Gro Products from December 1985 until May 1995. Mr. Kenlon began his
association with the Miracle-Gro Companies in 1960.

Mr. Petite was named Senior Vice President, Organics Business Group, of
Scotts in December 1996. From July 1996 to December 1996, he served as Vice
President, Organics Business Group, of Scotts. From November 1995 to July 1996,
Mr. Petite served as Vice President, Strategic Planning of Scotts. From April
1989 to November 1995, he was Vice President of Marketing, Consumer Business
Group of Scotts.

Mr. Stohler was named Senior Vice President, International, of Scotts in
December 1996. From November 1995 to December 1996, he served as Vice
President, International of Scotts. From 1994 to 1995, he was President of
Rubbermaid Europe S.A., a marketer of plastic housewares, toys, office supplies
and janitorial and food service products. From 1992 to 1994, he was Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of Synthes (USA), a marketer and
manufacturer of implants and surgical instruments for orthopedic health care.
From 1979 to 1991, he held various positions with S. C. Johnson Wax, a

Page 19
marketer of consumer goods, institutional products and specialty chemicals,
including assignments in Asia/Pacific, Latin America and Europe.

Ms. Smith was named Vice President, Human Resources of Scotts in October
1996. From April 1991 to October 1996, she was Director, Human Resources, and
from January 1986 to March 1991, she was Director, Compensation & Benefits, of
Scotts. Ms. Smith first joined Scotts in 1973.

Ms. Schmenk was named Secretary of Scotts in December 1996. Ms. Schmenk
joined Scotts in November of 1993 as Associate General Counsel, and held that
position until January 1996 when she was appointed Director, Legal Affairs.
From February 1992 to November 1993, she was an associate attorney at the law
firm Buckley, King & Bluso, and from October 1989 to February 1992, she was an
associate attorney at the law firm Denmead, Blackburn & Brown.


PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.

In accordance with General Instruction G(2), the information contained
under the captions "NYSE Symbol," "Stock Price Performance," "Price Range,"
"Shareholders" and "Dividends" on the Inside Back Cover of the Registrant's
Annual Report to Shareholders for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1996,
is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.

In accordance with General Instruction G(2), the information contained
under the caption "Five Year Summary", at page 29 of the Registrant's
Annual Report to Shareholders for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1996, is
incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATION.

In accordance with General Instruction G(2), the information contained
under the caption "Management's Discussion and Analysis", at pages 30 through
36 of the Registrant's Annual Report to Shareholders for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 1996, is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.

The Consolidated Financial Statements included on pages 37 through 54
and the Report of Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P., Independent Auditors, thereon
included on page 55 of the Registrant's Annual Report to Shareholders for the
fiscal year ended September 30, 1996, are incorporated herein by reference.

The "Quarterly Consolidated Financial Information" included in Note 16 of
the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements on page 54 of the Registrant's
Annual Report to Shareholders for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1996, is
also incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.

None.

Page 20
PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT.

In accordance with General Instruction G(3), the information contained
under the captions "BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF SECURITIES OF THE COMPANY - Voting
Restrictions on the Miracle-Gro Shareholders" and "ELECTION OF DIRECTORS" in the
Registrant's definitive Proxy Statement for the 1997 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders to be held on March 12, 1997 to be filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A promulgated under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Proxy Statement"), is incorporated herein by
reference. The information regarding executive officers required by Item 401 of
Regulation S-K is included in Part I hereof under the caption "Executive
Officers of Registrant." The Registrant is not required to make any disclosure
pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

In accordance with General Instruction G(3), the information contained
under the captions "EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION" and "ELECTION OF DIRECTORS --
Compensation of Directors" in the Registrant's Proxy Statement, is incorporated
herein by reference. Neither the report of the Compensation and Organization
Committee of the Registrant's Board of Directors on executive compensation nor
the performance graph included in the Registrant's Proxy Statement shall be
deemed to be incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS
AND MANAGEMENT.

In accordance with General Instruction G(3), the information contained
under the caption "BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF SECURITIES OF THE COMPANY" in the
Registrant's definitive Proxy Statement, is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS.

In accordance with General Instruction G(3), the information contained
under the captions "BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF SECURITIES OF THE COMPANY" and
"CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS" in the Registrant's definitive
Proxy Statement, is incorporated herein by reference.


PART IV

ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K.

(a) DOCUMENTS FILED AS PART OF THIS REPORT

1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS:

The following Consolidated Financial Statements of The Scotts Company
and Report of Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P., Independent Auditors, are
incorporated by reference to pages 37 through 55 of the Registrant's
1996 Annual Report to Shareholders:

Consolidated Statements of Operations -- Fiscal Years Ended September 30,
1994, 1995 and 1996.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow -- Fiscal Years Ended September 30,
1994, 1995 and 1996.

Page 21
Consolidated Balance Sheets -- September 30, 1995 and 1996.

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity -- Fiscal
Years Ended September 30, 1994, 1995 and 1996.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Report of Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P., Independent Auditors


2. FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES:

The following financial statement schedule of The Scotts Company, for
the fiscal years ended September 30, 1996, 1995, and 1994 is filed as part
of this Report and should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated
Financial Statements of The Scotts Company.

Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts........ 89-91

Schedules not listed above have been omitted because they are not
applicable or are not required or the information required to be set forth
therein is included in the Consolidated Financial Statements or Notes thereto.


3. EXHIBITS:

Exhibits filed with this Annual Report on Form 10-K are attached hereto.
For a list of such exhibits, see "Index to Exhibits" beginning at page E-1 (page
92 as sequentially numbered). The following table provides certain
information concerning executive compensation plans and arrangements required to
be filed as exhibits to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Executive Compensatory Plans and Arrangements

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

EXHIBIT
--------
NO. DESCRIPTION LOCATION
--- ----------- --------
<S> <C> <C>
10(a) The Scotts Company Associates' Pages 125 through 176
Pension Plan as amended
effective January 1, 1989 and
December 31, 1995

10(b) Third Restatement of The Scotts Pages 177 through 217
Company Profit Sharing and
Savings Plan

10(c) Employment Agreement, dated as Incorporated herein by
of October 21, 1991, between reference to the Annual
Scotts (as successor to The O.M. Report on Form 10-K for
Scott & Sons Company ("OMS") the fiscal year ended
and Theodore J. Host September 30, 1993 of
The Scotts Company, a
Delaware corporation
("Scotts Delaware") (File
No. 0-19768)
[Exhibit 10(g)]

Page 22
10(d)       Stock Option Plan and Agreement,        Incorporated herein by
dated as of January 9, 1992, reference to Scotts'
between Scotts (as successor to Annual Report on
Scotts Delaware) and Theodore J. Form 10-K for the fiscal
Host year ended
September 30, 1994
(File No. 0-19768)
[Exhibit 10(f)]

10(e) The O.M. Scott & Sons Company Incorporated herein by
Excess Benefit Plan, effective reference to Scotts
October 1, 1993 Delaware's Annual
Report on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended
September 30, 1993
(File No. 0-19768)
[Exhibit 10(h)]

10(f) The Scotts Company 1992 Long Incorporated herein by
Term Incentive Plan reference to Scotts
Delaware's Registration
Statement on Form S-8
filed on March 26, 1993
(Registration
No. 33-60056)
[Exhibit 4(f)]

10(g) The Scotts Company 1996 Pages 218 through 220
Executive Annual Incentive Plan

10(h) Employment Agreement, dated as Incorporated herein by
of May 19, 1995, between Scotts reference to Scotts'
and James Hagedorn Annual Report on Form
10-K for the fiscal year
ended September 30,
1995 (File No. 1-11593)
[Exhibit 10(p)]

10(i) The Scotts Company 1996 Stock Pages 221 through 229
Option Plan (as amended through
December 16, 1996)

10(j) Employment Agreement, dated as Pages 230 through 243
of May 19, 1995, among Stern's
Miracle-Gro Products, Inc. (nka
Scotts' Miracle-Gro Products,
Inc.), Scotts and Horace Hagedorn

10(k) Employment Agreement, dated as Pages 244 through 257
of May 19, 1995, among Stern's
Miracle-Gro Products, Inc. (nka
Scotts' Miracle-Gro Products,
Inc.), Scotts and John Kenlon

Page 23
10(l)       Employment Agreement, dated as          Pages 258 through 268
of August 7, 1996, between Scotts
and Charles M. Berger

10(m) Stock Option Agreement, dated as Pages 269 through 276
of August 7, 1996, between Scotts
and Charles M. Berger

10(n) Stock Option Agreement, dated as Pages 277 through 283
of March 5, 1996, between Scotts
and Tadd C. Seitz

10(o) Letter Agreement, dated April 10, Pages 284 through 293
1996, between Theodore J. Host
and Scotts

10(p) Letter Agreement, dated January Pages 294 through 299
18, 1996, between Scotts and Paul
D. Yeager, and amendment dated
September 16, 1996

</TABLE>

(b) REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

The Registrant filed a Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 3, 1996, which
reported, as an "Other Event", that a letter was forwarded by Mr. Tadd C. Seitz,
then Chairman of the Board, Interim President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Registrant, to certain investors and analysts. No financial statements were
required to be filed with the Current Report on Form 8-K.

(c) EXHIBITS

See Item 14(a)(3) above.

(d) FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

The response to this portion of Item 14 is submitted as a separate section of
this Annual Report on Form 10-K. See Item 14(a)(2) above.

Page 24
SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

THE SCOTTS COMPANY


Dated: December 23, 1996 By /s/ Charles M. Berger
----------------------------------
Charles M. Berger, Chairman of the
Board, President and Chief Executive
Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
Report has been signed below by the following persons in the capacities and on
the dates indicated.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIGNATURE TITLE DATE
--------- ----- -----
<S> <C> <C>
/s/ James B Beard Director December 23, 1996
- -----------------------------------
James B Beard

/s/ Charles M. Berger Chairman of the Board/ December 23, 1996
- ----------------------------------- President/Chief Executive Officer
Charles M. Berger

/s/ John S. Chamberlin Director December 23, 1996
- -----------------------------------
John S. Chamberlin

/s/ Joseph P. Flannery Director December 23, 1996
- -----------------------------------
Joseph P. Flannery

/s/ Horace Hagedorn Vice Chairman/Director December 23, 1996
- -----------------------------------
Horace Hagedorn

/s/ James Hagedorn Executive Vice President/ December 23, 1996
- ----------------------------------- Director
James Hagedorn

/s/ John Kenlon Director December 23, 1996
- -----------------------------------
John Kenlon

/s/ Karen Gordon Mills Director December 23, 1996
- -----------------------------------
Karen Gordon Mills

/s/ Tadd C. Seitz Director December 23, 1996
- -----------------------------------
Tadd C. Seitz

/s/ Donald A. Sherman Director December 23, 1996
- -----------------------------------
Donald A. Sherman

/s/ John M. Sullivan Director December 23, 1996
- -----------------------------------
John M. Sullivan

/s/ L. Jack Van Fossen Director December 23, 1996
- -----------------------------------
L. Jack Van Fossen

/s/ Paul D. Yeager Executive Vice President/ December 23, 1996
- ----------------------------------- Chief Financial Officer/
Paul D. Yeager Principal Accounting Officer

Page 25
</TABLE>
FIVE-YEAR SUMMARY

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

THE SCOTTS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
For years ended September 30
(in thousands except share data) 1992 1993(1) 1994(2) 1995(3) 1996
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data

<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net sales $ 413,558 $ 466,043 $ 606,339 $ 732,837 $ 751,880
Cost of sales 213,133 244,218 319,730 394,369 414,075
Inventory writedown - - - - 3,084
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Gross profit 200,425 221,825 286,609 338,468 334,721
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Operating expenses:
Marketing 66,245 74,579 100,106 130,179 140,919
Distribution 61,051 67,377 84,407 104,513 95,181
General and administrative 24,759 27,688 30,189 28,672 34,266
Research and development 6,205 7,700 10,352 10,970 10,605
Amortization of goodwill and other intangibles 816 1,615 3,633 5,950 8,812
Other income, net (796) (955) (1,350) (163) (558)
Unusual (income) charges - - - (4,227) 17,703
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Total operating expenses 158,280 178,004 227,337 275,894 306,928
------- ------- ------- ------- -------

Income from operations 42,145 43,821 59,272 62,574 27,793
Interest expense 15,942 8,454 17,450 26,320 26,541
------- ------- ------- ------- -------

Income before income taxes, extraordinary
items and cumulative effect of accounting changes 26,203 35,367 41,822 36,254 1,252
Income taxes 11,124 14,320 17,947 13,898 3,782
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Income (loss) before extraordinary items and
cumulative effect of accounting changes 15,079 21,047 23,875 22,356 (2,530)
Extraordinary items:
Loss on early extinguishment of debt, net of tax (4,186) - (992) - -
Utilization of net operating loss carryforwards 4,699 - - - -
Cumulative effect of changes in accounting for
postretirement benefits, net of tax and
accounting for income taxes - (13,157) - - -
------- ------- ------- ------- -------

Net income (loss) 15,592 7,890 22,883 22,356 (2,530)

Preferred stock dividends - - - 3,559 9,750
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Income (loss) applicable to common shareholders $ 15,592 $ 7,890 $ 22,883 $ 18,797 $ (12,280)
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Net income (loss) per common share:
Income (loss) before extraordinary items and
cumulative effect of accounting changes $ 0.84 $ 1.07 $ 1.27 $ 0.99 $ (0.65)
Extraordinary items:
Loss on early extinguishment of debt, net of tax (0.23) - (0.05) - -
Utilization of net operating loss carryforwards 0.26 - - - -
Cumulative effect of changes in accounting for
postretirement benefits, net of tax and income taxes - (0.67) - - -
------- ------- ------- ------- -------

Net income (loss) per common share $ 0.87 $ 0.40 $ 1.22 $ 0.99 $ (0.65)
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
------- ------- ------- ------- -------

Common shares used in per share calculation 18,014,151 19,687,013 18,784,729 22,616,685 18,785,724

Consolidated Balance Sheets Data
Working capital $ 54,795 $ 88,526 $ 140,566 $ 226,998 $ 181,203
Capital investment 19,896 15,158 33,402 23,606 18,215
Property, plant and equipment, net 89,070 98,791 140,105 148,754 139,488
Total assets 268,021 321,590 528,584 809,045 731,685
Term debt, including current portion 31,897 92,524 223,885 272,446 223,325
Total shareholders' equity 175,929 143,013 168,160 380,790 364,301


</TABLE>

(1) Includes Republic Tool and Manufacturing Corp. ("Republic") from November
19, 1992
(2) Includes Scotts-Sierra Horticulture Products Company ("Sierra") from
December 16, 1993
(3) Includes Scotts' Miracle-Gro Products, Inc. and its subsidiaries
("Miracle-Gro Companies") from May 19, 1995
ITEM 7.  MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS.

The following discussion and analysis of the consolidated results of
operations for the fiscal years ended September 30, 1996, 1995 and 1994 and
the financial condition at September 30, 1996 should be read in conjunction
with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes included elsewhere in
this Report.

A merger and an acquisition in recent years have a significant impact on the
year-to-year comparisons of results of operations. Effective May 19, 1995,
The Scotts Company ("Scotts" or the "Company") merged with Stern's
Miracle-Gro Products, Inc. ("Miracle-Gro"); therefore, fiscal 1996 was the
first year Miracle-Gro's spring selling season was included in Scotts'
consolidated results of operations. Effective December 16, 1993, Scotts
completed its acquisition of Grace-Sierra Horticultural Products Company
("Sierra"). Pro forma discussions herein give effect to both of these
transactions as if they had occurred on October 1, 1993.

REVIEW OF FISCAL 1996
Fiscal 1996 was a significant and challenging financial year for Scotts. The
Company continued as the clear market leader in the U.S. consumer lawn and
garden industry, remained a leader in the U.S. professional turf and
horticulture management markets, and continued to grow its highly profitable
international business. During fiscal 1996, the Company reported record net
sales of $751.9 million. While management believes Scotts maintained and
expanded its key market positions in 1996, the Company made several decisions
that resulted in a significant reduction in income from operations and a $2.5
million net loss for the fiscal year.

Fiscal 1996 net sales were unfavorably impacted as the Company discontinued a
program encouraging retailers to build their consumer lawns products
inventories substantially in advance of the spring selling season. This
program was costly to Scotts as it included higher than normal discounting
and promotional allowances to retailers. Management estimates that retailers
had approximately $60 million in inventories related to this program at the
beginning of Scotts fiscal 1996. Marketing expense was higher in proportion
to sales in 1995 and 1996, due in part to the impact of the consumer lawns
retailer early purchase program.

The Company took additional steps toward long-term sustained profitability by
restructuring certain aspects of its business, resulting in $17.7 million of
unusual charges during 1996. These unusual charges were for severance costs
related to the termination of approximately 120 associates and for assets
whose book values were impaired as a result of operational and strategic
business changes.

The Company has also recently realigned its U.S. Consumer Business Group into
three smaller, more focused groups: Consumer Lawns, Consumer Gardens and
Organics. Management believes these newly established groups, in addition to
the previously existing Professional and International Business Groups,
provide the Company with a strategic organizational structure that is focused
on the opportunities associated with each business and the special
requirements of their customers, with the ultimate objective of maximizing
profitability and overall shareholder value.

The first major positive outcome of the discontinuance of the consumer lawns
retailer early purchase program was improved working capital management (that
contributed to operating cash flows of $82.3 million in 1996), which combined
with lower capital investments, generated approximately $51.9 million of free
cash flow (cash provided by operating activities less capital investment and
Preferred Stock dividends) during fiscal 1996, compared to negative free cash
flow of $20.3 million and $23.5 million in fiscal 1995 and 1994, respectively.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table sets forth the components of income and expense for the
three years ended September 30, 1996 on a percent-of-net sales basis:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
------------------------------
1994 1995 1996
-------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Net sales 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cost of sales 52.7 53.8 55.1
Inventory writedown - - 0.4
-------- -------- --------
Gross profit 47.3 46.2 44.5
-------- -------- --------

Operating expenses:
Marketing 16.5 17.8 18.7
Distribution 13.9 14.3 12.7
General and administrative 5.0 3.9 4.5
Research and development 1.7 1.5 1.4
Amortization of goodwill and other intangibles 0.6 0.8 1.2
Other income, net (0.2) - (0.1)
Unusual (income) charges - (0.6) 2.4
-------- -------- --------
Total operating expenses 37.5 37.7 40.8
-------- -------- --------

Income from operations 9.8 8.5 3.7
-------- -------- --------

Interest expense 2.9 3.6 3.5
-------- -------- --------

Income before income taxes and extraordinary item 6.9 4.9 0.2

Income taxes 3.0 1.9 0.5
-------- -------- --------

Income (loss) before extraordinary item 3.9 3.0 (0.3)
Extraordinary item:
Loss on early extinguishment of debt, net of tax (0.1) - -
-------- -------- --------

Net income (loss) 3.8 3.0 (0.3)
Preferred stock dividends - 0.5 1.3
-------- -------- --------

Income (loss) applicable to common shareholders 3.8% 2.5% (1.6)%
-------- -------- --------
-------- -------- --------
</TABLE>

FISCAL 1996 COMPARED WITH FISCAL 1995
Net sales for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1996 totaled $751.9
million, an increase of $19 million or 2.6% from the prior year. Compared to
fiscal 1995 pro forma net sales of $821.2 million, net sales decreased by
$69.3 million or 8.4%. Compared to 1995 pro forma, 1996 net sales declined
principally due to the discontinuance of a consumer lawns retailer early
purchase program, that encouraged retailers to build their inventories
substantially in advance of the spring selling season and had the impact of
increasing sales in the latter four months of fiscal 1995. Management
estimates that approximately $60 million (7.3%) of the 1996 net sales decline
from 1995 pro forma is a result of the discontinuance of this program. Sales
volumes (down 11.1% in total compared to 1995 pro forma) were also
unfavorably impacted by unusually poor spring weather conditions in North
America and Northern Europe. Net sales increased approximately 2.7% in 1996
compared to 1995 pro forma as a result of pricing.
Consumer Lawns Group net sales decreased $49.7 million or 18.0% ($54.1
million or 19.3% on a pro forma basis) to $225.9 million in 1996, primarily
as a result of the discontinuance of the retailer early purchase program
(approximately 21.4%). Consumer lawns 1996 sales were further negatively
impacted by poor spring weather in its major markets (6.0%), partially offset
by modest price increases (5.2%) and the impact of expanded distribution of
Miracle-Gro Extra Long Lasting Lawn Food (2.9%). Compared to 1995 actual,
Consumer Gardens Group net sales increased from $82.2 million to $115.3
million, primarily as a result of the inclusion of Miracle-Gro for the first
full fiscal year. On a pro forma basis, consumer gardens net sales decreased
1.5%, reflecting the integration of the Miracle-Gro and Scotts garden product
lines, resulting in the elimination of certain overlapping products (2.6%),
and the poor spring weather in 1996. Organics Business Group net sales
decreased by $6.7 million or 3.6% to $181.1 million in 1996, primarily due to
lower volume resulting from poor spring weather and the closure of several
composting facilities.

In 1996, Professional Business Group net sales were $154.5 million, a
decrease of $6.8 million or 4.2%, primarily as a result of poor spring and
summer weather, and the elimination of certain end of season discounting
programs in 1996 (together, 7.6%), partially offset by modest price increases
(3.3%). International Business Group net sales increased by $5.5 million or
8.0% to $75.1 million in 1996, principally due to strong sales gains in the
Asia/Pacific and Latin American regions, partially offset by poor spring
weather conditions in Northern Europe.

During 1995, the Peters-Registered Trademark- line of U.S. consumer
water-soluble fertilizer products ("CWSF") generated net sales of $5.4
million; this line was divested in 1995 under a Federal Trade Commission
consent order pursuant to the merger with Miracle-Gro.

Cost of sales were 55.5% of net sales in 1996, a 1.7 percentage point
increase compared to 53.8% of net sales in 1995. The increase resulted from
the inventory writedown for products that are being phased out as part of the
Company's plan to simplify its products lines, lower than planned production
volumes resulting in higher proportional manufacturing costs, and to a lesser
extent, unfavorable sales mix resulting from the discontinuance of the
consumer lawns retailer early purchase program.

Operating expenses increased $31 million or 11.3% to $306.9 million in 1996,
from $275.9 million in 1995. Operating expenses were 40.8% of net sales in
1996, compared to 37.7% in 1995. Excluding unusual (income) charges in both
years, operating expenses increased $9.1 million or 3.3% to $289.2 million,
from $280.1 million in 1995. Excluding unusual (income) charges, operating
expenses were 38.4% of net sales in 1996, compared to 38.3% of net sales in
1995. Excluding unusual (income) charges, operating expenses increased due to
the inclusion of Miracle-Gro for a full year in 1996 (7.7%), higher media
advertising of consumer lawns products (2.1%), expansion of the International
sales and marketing infrastructure (1.0%), and to a lesser extent, higher bad
debts, associate medical and dental expenses, and external legal costs.
These factors were partially offset by lower retailer promotional spending as
a result of the discontinuance of the consumer lawns retailer early purchase
program (3.8%), lower distribution costs on lower sales volumes (3.9%), and
to a lesser extent, a partial year impact of cost reduction programs.

During fiscal 1996, the Company recorded $17.7 million (2.4% of net sales) of
unusual charges resulting from initiatives designed to reduce costs, increase
operating efficiencies and return the Company to profitability. The unusual
charges were for severance costs associated with restructurings and
write-downs of various under-utilized or idle assets, including several plant
closings. In fiscal 1995, the Company recorded $4.2 million of unusual
income related to the divestiture of the Peters-Registered Trademark- line of
U.S. CWSF products, decreasing operating expenses by 0.6% of net sales.
Interest expense increased $0.2 million to $26.5 million in 1996.  The
increase was a result of higher average borrowings in the first eight months
of fiscal 1996, reflecting incremental receivables associated with the
consumer lawns retailer early purchase program and the first year impact of
Miracle-Gro's seasonal working capital requirements. Average borrowings
increased to approximately $317.5 million in 1996, $23.5 million higher than
1995. Higher average borrowings were partially offset by a decrease in the
average variable interest rate for the Company of approximately one-half of
one percent.

The Company's effective tax rate in 1996 was 302.3%, compared to 38.3% in
1995. Excluding unusual (income) charges in both years, the effective tax
rate would have been 52.4% in 1996 versus 43.4% in 1995. Including unusual
charges, the high effective tax rate in 1996 is attributable to non-tax
deductible amortization of goodwill and certain intangibles in the U.S.,
combined with the low level of reported pre-tax income. Additional
information on the effective tax rate is provided in Note 10 to the Company's
Consolidated Financial Statements.

During 1996, the Company reported a net loss of $2.5 million, compared to net
income of $22.4 million in 1995. Excluding unusual (income) charges and the
inventory writedown (approximately $13 million in 1996 and ($4.2) million
in 1995, on an after tax basis), Scotts would have reported net income of
approximately $10.5 million in 1996 versus net income of $18.2 million in
1995. The decline in net income before unusual items in 1996 is primarily due
to lower net sales as a result of the discontinuance of the consumer lawns
retailer early purchase program and poor spring weather impacting all
business groups, lower gross margins due to lower than planned manufacturing
volumes and unfavorable sales mix, and higher investment in consumer directed
media, partially offset by the positive impact from inclusion of Miracle-Gro
for a full year in fiscal 1996.

FISCAL 1995 COMPARED WITH FISCAL 1994
Net sales increased to $732.8 million, up approximately 20.9%, primarily due
to increased sales volume (14.5%), of which 5.2% resulted from a consumer
lawns early purchase program which encouraged retailers to start building
their inventories for the spring of 1996 in the latter four months of Scotts
fiscal 1995, while deferring payment to 1996. The increase in actual net
sales also reflects the inclusion of Sierra for the full year in 1995 (3.4%)
and Miracle-Gro from the merger date of May 19, 1995 (3.0%). On a pro forma
basis, net sales increased by $95 million or 13.1% to $821.2 million

Consumer Lawns Group net sales increased $54.1 million or 22.9% to $275.6
million. This increase resulted primarily from increased volume, of which
12.9% resulted from the retailer early purchase. Consumer Gardens Group net
sales increased $21 million to $33.1 million, reflecting the partial year
impact of the merger with Miracle-Gro on May 19, 1995. On a pro forma basis,
consumer gardens net sales increased $5.8 million or 5.2% to $117 million.
Organics Business Group net sales increased $17.5 million or 10.2% to $187.8
million, primarily as a result of volume increases.

Professional Business Group net sales of $161.3 million increased by 11.1%,
primarily due to the inclusion of Sierra for a full year in 1995 (8.0%) and
an increased demand for horticulture products (3.1%). International Business
Group sales increased by 43.7% to $69.6 million due to gains in these markets
combined with the positive impact resulting from the sale of Scotts products
in the Company's international distribution network (19.7%), the inclusion of
Sierra net sales for the full year (16.9%) and favorable exchange rates
(7.1%).
Cost of sales represented 53.8% of net sales in fiscal 1995, a 1.1 percentage
point increase compared to 52.7% of net sales in fiscal 1994. The increase
resulted from higher prices for urea (a primary source of nitrogen in most of
Company's fertilizer products), increased International sales of lower margin
U.S. produced products, increased sales of lower margin domestic products,
and to a lesser extent, pricing incentives to major consumer lawns and
professional customers.

Operating expenses increased $48.6 million or 21.4% to $275.9 million in
1995, from $227.3 million in 1994. Excluding unusual income in 1995,
operating expenses increased $52.8 million or 23.2%. Marketing expense
increased 30.0% due primarily to increased promotional allowances to
retailers (16.2%) and to a lesser extent increased sales, a higher proportion
of International sales which carry a higher ratio of marketing cost to sales,
and higher sales force incentives. Distribution expense increased 23.8% as a
result of higher sales volume, higher warehousing and storage costs as a
result of increased inventory levels, higher freight rates and a higher
proportion of the sales growth in lower value per pound products. These
increases were partially offset by a 5% decline in general and administrative
expense as a result of synergies achieved from the integration of Sierra,
cost controls and reduced management incentives. Amortization of goodwill and
other intangibles increased as a result of the merger with Miracle-Gro and
the first full year including Sierra. Other income, net decreased
principally as a result of the Company's portion of the loss from Miracle
Garden Care, Ltd ("MGC Ltd") and a reduction in royalty income.

Interest expense increased 50.8%. The increase was caused by higher interest
rates on the floating-rate bank debt and the 9 7/8% Senior Subordinated Notes
due August 1, 2004 (the "Notes") compared with the floating-rate bank debt
the Notes replaced (32.6%), a full year outstanding of the borrowings to fund
the Sierra acquisition (8.1%) and an increase in borrowing levels (10.1%)
principally to support higher working capital requirements and capital
investments.

The Company's effective tax rate decreased from 42.9% in 1994 to 38.3% in
1995. This decrease results primarily from the tax treatment of the
disposition of the Peters-Registered Trademark- line of CWSF products (3%)
and resolution of prior year tax contingencies (3.9%) offset by an increase
in non-tax deductible amortization of goodwill and intangible assets (1.3%).

Net income of $22.4 million decreased by $0.5 million from 1994. Among the
significant items impacting 1995 results were increased revenues and costs
from the Consumer Lawns retailer early purchase program, the gain from the
divestiture of the Peters-Registered Trademark- line of CWSF products, the
lower effective tax rate, and the higher cost of urea, each as discussed more
fully above and an extraordinary charge of $1 million, net of tax, in 1994
for the early extinguishment of debt.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Current assets of $292 million as of September 30, 1996, decreased by $58.9
million compared with the prior year end. The decrease was attributable to a
$66.1 million decrease in accounts receivable, partially offset by slightly
higher inventories and cash balances. Accounts receivable as of September
30, 1995 included approximately $60 million related to the consumer lawns
retailer early purchase program. This retailer early purchase program was
significantly modified for the spring 1997 selling season, eliminating the
majority of extended terms accounts receivable on September 30, 1996.

Current liabilities of $110.8 million as of September 30, 1996, decreased by
$13.1 million compared with the prior year end. The decrease was principally
attributable to lower trade payables as a result of lower fourth quarter 1996
manufacturing volumes, in line with the discontinuance of the retailer early
purchase program that increased fourth quarter 1995 sales and production
requirements.
Capital investments totaled approximately $18.2 million and $23.6 million for
the fiscal years ended September 30, 1996 and 1995, respectively, and are
expected to be approximately $20 million in fiscal 1997. In addition, the
Company is evaluating expansion of its Marysville distribution facility,
which is expected to generated annual distribution savings of at least $1.5
million. The proposed expansion could result in additional capital
investments of up to $10 million in 1997. The Company's Fourth Amended and
Restated Credit Agreement (the "Credit Agreement") restricts capital
investments to $50 million per fiscal year, with a one-year carryover
provision. These investments will be financed with cash provided by
operations and utilization of available credit facilities.

Long-term debt as of September 30, 1996 decreased $48.9 million compared with
September 30, 1995. The decrease in long-term debt is a direct result of
$82.3 million in cash provided by operating activities, less capital
investments of $18.2 million, cash paid for preferred stock dividends of
$12.2 million (higher than the $9.8 million annual dividend requirement due
to timing of payments around the end of fiscal 1995), and net common stock
repurchases of $2.3 million.

Shareholders' equity decreased by $16.5 million to $364.3 million as of
September 30, 1996. The decrease was due to the net loss of $2.5 million,
Convertible Preferred Stock dividends of $9.8 million, a net change in
treasury stock of $2.2 million and an unfavorable change in the cumulative
foreign currency adjustment of $1.9 million.

The primary sources of liquidity for the Company are funds generated by
operations and borrowings under the Company's Credit Agreement. The Credit
Agreement was amended and restated in March 1995. As amended, the Credit
Agreement is unsecured and provides up to $375 million through March 31,
2000, and does not contain a term loan facility. Additional information on
the Credit Agreement is described in Note seven to the Company's Consolidated
Financial Statements.

The Company has foreign exchange rate risk related to international
operations and cash flows. During fiscal 1995, a program was designed to
minimize the exposure to adverse currency impacts on the cash value of the
Company's non-local currency receivables and payables, as well as the
associated earnings impact. Since January 1995, the Company has entered into
forward foreign exchange contracts and purchase currency options tied to the
economic value of receivables and payables and expected cash flows
denominated in non-local foreign currencies. Management anticipates that
these financial instruments will act as an effective hedge against the
potential adverse impact of exchange rate fluctuations on the Company's
results of operations, financial condition and liquidity. It is recognized,
however, that the program will minimize but not completely eliminate the
Company's exposure to adverse currency movements.

As of September 30, 1996, the Company's European operations had foreign
exchange risk in various European currencies tied to the Dutch guilder. These
currencies include the Australian Dollar, Belgian Franc, German Mark, Spanish
Peseta, French Franc, British Pound, Italian Lire, and the U.S. Dollar. The
Company's U.S. operations had foreign exchange rate risk in the Canadian
Dollar, Dutch Guilder and the British Pound which are tied to the U.S.
Dollar. As of September 30, 1996, there were outstanding forward foreign
exchange contracts with a value of approximately $16.6 million. These
contracts had maturity dates ranging from October 29, 1996 to June 10, 1997.

In the opinion of the Company's management, cash flows from operations and
capital resources will be sufficient to meet debt service and working capital
needs during the 1997 fiscal year.
INFLATION
The Company is subject to the effects of changing prices. The Company has,
however, generally been able to pass along inflationary increases in its
costs by increasing the prices of its products.

ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS
The Company is subject to local, state, federal and foreign environmental
protection laws and regulations with respect to its business operations and
believes it is operating in substantial compliance with, or taking action
aimed at ensuring compliance with, such laws and regulations. The Company is
involved in several environmental related legal actions with various
governmental agencies. While it is difficult to quantify the potential
financial impact of actions involving environmental matters, particularly
remediation costs at waste disposal sites and future capital expenditures for
environmental control equipment, in the opinion of management, the ultimate
liability arising from such environmental matters, taking into account
established reserves, should not have a material adverse affect on the
Company's financial position; however, there can be no assurance that future
quarterly or annual operating results will not be materially affected by the
resolution of these matters. Additional information on environmental matters
affecting the Company is provided in Note 12 to the Company's Consolidated
Financial Statements and in the annual report on Form 10-K to the Securities
and Exchange Commission for the year ended September 30, 1996 under the
"Business" and "Legal Proceedings" sections.

ACCOUNTING ISSUES
During 1996, the Company adopted SFAS No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of," which
requires review for possible impairment whenever events or business
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be
recoverable. Although the Company's previous accounting policies were in
accordance with SFAS No. 121, the guidelines of this pronouncement were
applied in determining certain of the unusual charges recorded in fiscal 1996.

In October 1995, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 123
"Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation", effective for financial statements
for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 1995. SFAS No. 123 provides
for, but does not require, a fair value method of accounting for stock-based
compensation arrangements rather than the intrinsic value method previously
required. Alternatively, entities that retain the intrinsic value method are
required to disclose in the notes to the financial statements pro forma net
income and earnings per share information as if the fair value method had
been applied. The Company does not intend to adopt the fair value method of
SFAS No. 123; therefore, this standard will not have a material effect on the
Company's consolidated financial statements.

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
The Company has signed a letter of intent to acquire the remaining ownership
interests of the MGC Ltd business; Scotts currently owns approximately a
one-third interest in this business. MGC Ltd is principally engaged in the
manufacture and sale of consumer lawn and garden products in the United
Kingdom. Closing of this transaction is expected to occur during the second
quarter of fiscal 1997.

In connection with the pending MGC Ltd acquisition, the Company is seeking an
amendment to its Credit Agreement for the purpose of financing the
acquisition, refinancing MGC Ltd's existing debt and providing for MGC Ltd's
seasonal working capital needs. The proposed amendment provides for an
increase in the available line-of-credit from $375 million to $425 million,
and allows up to the equivalent of $100 million of the available credit to be
borrowed in British pounds sterling. Other terms of the Credit Agreement
will remain essentially unchanged.
OUTLOOK FOR 1997
Looking forward to 1997, management expects that the discontinuance of the
consumer lawns retailer early purchase program, the realignment of the
business groups designed to provide better focus on and accountability for
performance, and the positive impacts of the recent restructurings to return
the Company to profitability. However, these changes, along with inherent
risks of a seasonal business, present several challenges for 1997.

The Consumer Lawns Groups' marketing strategy has been refocused on consumer
directed, "pull" advertising and less on the retailer directed, "push"
promotional programs heavily relied upon in recent years. Although
presentations to retailers indicate encouraging acceptance of these new
marketing and promotional programs, the success thereof and the impact of the
change in the pre-season selling programs is unknown. On a pro forma basis,
the Company has historically generated 66% to 68% of its annual revenues in
its second and third fiscal quarters. Management expects this relationship
to continue or to become slightly more pronounced with the change in the
consumer lawns marketing and promotional programs. Spring weather conditions
in North America are also a significant factor impacting sales of the
Company's products, especially in the early spring selling season.

Management expects gross profit margins to improve in 1996 as a result of the
anticipated recovery of the relatively higher margin consumer lawns business,
higher volumes increasing manufacturing efficiencies, and stabilized raw
material prices. In particular, recent prices for urea have stabilized,
which combined with a long-term supply agreement, should keep the cost of
this key raw material in-line with 1996 levels. In the last quarter of 1997,
the Company plans to change over to plastic packaging for its key consumer
lawns products and update the technology of one of its key manufacturing
lines. These planned changes, along with the general direction toward
simplifying its product lines, may put temporary downward pressure on gross
profit margins during the transition period as new processes startup and old
products are phased out.

The Company expects a lower effective tax rate in 1997 in the range of 42% to
44%, principally as a result of the anticipated return to profitability.

SAFE HARBOR STATEMENT UNDER THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION ACT OF 1995.
The statements contained in this report which are not historical fact are
"forward looking statements" that involve various important risks,
uncertainties, and other factors which could cause the Company's actual
results for 1997 and beyond to differ materially from those expressed in such
forward looking statements. These important factors include, without
limitation, the risks and factors set forth above in "Outlook for 1997" as
well as other risks previously disclosed in the Company's securities filings.
THE SCOTTS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Operations
for the years ended September 30, 1994, 1995 and 1996
(in thousands except per share amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1994 1995 1996
-------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Net sales $606,339 $732,837 $751,880
Cost of sales 319,730 394,369 414,075
Inventory writedown - - 3,084
-------- -------- --------

Gross profit 286,609 338,468 334,721
-------- -------- --------

Marketing 100,106 130,179 140,919
Distribution 84,407 104,513 95,181
General and administrative 30,189 28,672 34,266
Research and development 10,352 10,970 10,605
Amortization of goodwill and other intangibles 3,633 5,950 8,812
Other income, net (1,350) (163) (558)
Unusual (income) charges - (4,227) 17,703
-------- -------- --------

Income from operations 59,272 62,574 27,793

Interest expense 17,450 26,320 26,541
-------- -------- --------

Income before income taxes and extraordinary item 41,822 36,254 1,252

Income taxes 17,947 13,898 3,782
-------- -------- --------

Income (loss) before extraordinary item 23,875 22,356 (2,530)

Extraordinary item:
Loss on early extinguishment of debt, net of tax (992) - -
-------- -------- --------

Net income (loss) 22,883 22,356 (2,530)

Preferred stock dividends - 3,559 9,750
-------- -------- --------

Income (loss) applicable to common shareholders $ 22,883 $ 18,797 $(12,280)
-------- -------- --------
-------- -------- --------

Net income (loss) per common share:
Income (loss) before extraordinary item $ 1.27 $ 0.99 $ (0.65)
Extraordinary item:
Loss on early extinguishment of debt, net of tax (.05) - -
-------- -------- --------

Net income (loss) per common share $ 1.22 $ 0.99 $ (0.65)
-------- -------- --------
-------- -------- --------

Common shares used in per share calculation 18,785 22,617 18,786
-------- -------- --------
-------- -------- --------
</TABLE>

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
THE SCOTTS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
for the years ended September 30, 1994, 1995 and 1996
<TABLE>

1994 1995 1996
---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income (loss) $ 22,883 $22,356 $ (2,530)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net
cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation 13,375 16,056 16,812
Amortization 8,562 9,599 12,473
Extraordinary loss on early extinguishment of debt 992 - -
Unusual (income) charges - (4,227) 15,052
Postretirement benefits 368 145 (2)
Deferred income taxes 5,378 (2,596) (5,728)
Loss (gain) on sale of equipment 29 (55) (93)
Equity in loss (income) of unconsolidated businesses - 1,216 (493)
Provision for losses on accounts receivable 1,974 1,533 3,363
Other 234 (309) (464)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable (33,846) (36,661) 62,736
Inventories (10,406) (22,984) (4,883)
Prepaid and other current assets (2,065) (2,119) 2,068
Accounts payable 6,400 12,049 (16,919)
Accrued liabilities 6,220 9,567 638
Other assets and liabilities (10,231) 906 312
------ ------ ------
Net cash provided by operating activities 9,867 4,476 82,342
------ ------ ------

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Investment in property, plant and equipment (33,402) (23,606) (18,215)
Proceeds from sale of equipment 384 718 834
Investment in affiliate - (250) -
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired (117,107) - -
Cash acquired in merger with Miracle-Gro - 6,449 -
Proceeds from Peters divestiture - 9,966 -
------ ------ ------
Net cash used in investing activities (150,125) (6,723) (17,381)
------ ------ ------

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Borrowings under term debt 289,215 - -
Payments on term and other debt (166,844) (27,127) -
Net borrowings (payments) under revolving credit 30,500 27,402 (48,553)
Net borrowings (payments) under bank line of credit 1,211 (1,819) 1,903
Deferred financing cost incurred (5,139) (486) -
Purchase of Common Shares - - (9,779)
Issuance of Common Shares 160 436 7,477
Dividends on Class A Convertible Preferred Stock - (1,122) (12,187)
------ ------ ------
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 149,103 (2,716) (61,139)
------ ------ ------

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash (473) 1,296 (252)
------ ------ ------

Net increase (decrease) in cash 8,372 (3,667) 3,570
Cash, beginning of period 2,323 10,695 7,028
------ ------ ------
Cash, end of period $ 10,695 $ 7,028 $ 10,598
------ ------ ------
------ ------ ------

SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Interest (net of amount capitalized) $ 10,965 $ 23,808 $ 25,483
Income taxes paid 20,144 11,339 4,420
Dividends declared not paid - 2,437 -
Businesses acquired:
Fair value of assets acquired 143,520 235,564
Liabilities assumed (26,413) (39,875)
Net cash paid for acquisition 117,107 -
Class A Convertible Preferred Stock issued 177,255
Warrants issued 14,434
</TABLE>
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
THE SCOTTS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Balance Sheets
September 30, 1995 and 1996
(in thousands)

ASSETS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1995 1996
---- ----
<S> <C> <C>
Current Assets:
Cash $ 7,028 $ 10,598
Accounts receivable, less allowance of $3,406 in 1995 and $4,114 in 1996 176,525 110,426
Inventories 143,953 148,836
Prepaid and other assets 23,354 22,101
--------- --------
Total current assets 350,860 291,961
--------- --------

Property, plant and equipment, net 148,754 139,488
Trademarks 89,250 86,997
Other intangibles 24,421 19,455
Goodwill 179,988 180,154
Other assets 15,772 13,630
--------- --------

Total Assets $809,045 $731,685
--------- --------
--------- --------

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY

Current Liabilities:
Revolving credit line $ 97 $ 2,000
Current portion of term debt 421 197
Accounts payable 63,207 46,288
Accrued liabilities 41,409 42,603
Accrued taxes 18,728 19,670
--------- --------
Total current liabilities 123,862 110,758
--------- --------

Term debt, less current portion 272,025 223,128
Postretirement benefits other than pensions 27,159 27,157
Other liabilities 5,209 6,341
--------- --------

Total Liabilities 428,255 367,384
--------- --------

Commitments and Contingencies

Shareholders' Equity:
Class A Convertible Preferred Stock, no par value 177,255 177,255
Common shares, $.01 stated value, issued 21,082 shares in 1995 and 1996 211 211
Capital in excess of par value 207,551 207,650
Retained earnings 32,672 20,392
Cumulative foreign currency translation adjustments 4,082 2,151
Treasury stock, 2,388 shares in 1995 and 2,507 shares in 1996, at cost (40,981) (43,358)
--------- --------
Total Shareholders' Equity 380,790 364,301
--------- --------

Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity $809,045 $731,685
--------- --------
--------- --------

</TABLE>
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

THE SCOTTS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity
for the years ended September 30, 1994, 1995 and 1996
(in thousands)
Total
Convertible Class A Share-
Preferred Stock Common Shares Capital in Retained Treasury Stock Cumulative holders'
------------------- ------------- excess of Earnings/ -------------- Translation Equity/
Shares Amount Shares Amount Par Value (Deficit) Shares Amount Gain(Loss) (Deficit)
------ ------ ------ ------ --------- --------- ------ ------- --------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>

Balance, September 30, 1993 21,073 $211 $193,263 $(9,008) (2,415) $(41,441) $(12) $143,013

Net income 22,883 22,883
Amortization of unearned
compensation 27 27
Foreign currency translation
adjustment 2,077 2,077

Issuance of common shares 9 160 160
------ ------ ------ ------ --------- --------- ------ ------- --------- ----------

Balance, September 30, 1994 21,082 211 193,450 13,875 (2,415) (41,441) 2,065 168,160

Net income 22,356 22,356
Dividends (3,559) (3,559)
Amortization of unearned
compensation 24 24
Foreign currency translation
adjustment 2,017 2,017
Issuance of common shares
held in treasury (24) 27 460 436
Issuance of Class A Convertible
Preferred Stock 195 $177,255 177,255
Issuance of warrants 14,434 14,434
Options outstanding (333) (333)
------ ------ ------ ------ --------- --------- ------ ------- --------- ----------

Balance, September 30, 1995 195 177,255 21,082 211 207,551 32,672 (2,388) (40,981) 4,082 380,790

Net loss (2,530) (2,530)
Dividends (9,750) (9,750)
Amortization of unearned
compensation 24 24
Foreign currency translation
adjustment (1,931) (1,931)
Issuance of common shares
held in treasury 75 431 7,402 7,477
Purchase of common shares (550) (9,779) (9,779)
------ ------ ------ ------ --------- --------- ------ ------- --------- ----------

Balance, September 30, 1996 195 $177,255 21,082 $211 $207,650 $20,392 (2,507) $(43,358) $2,151 $364,301
------ ------ ------ ------ --------- --------- ------ ------- --------- ----------
------ ------ ------ ------ --------- --------- ------ ------- --------- ----------

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
</TABLE>
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

NATURE OF OPERATIONS

The Scotts Company is engaged in the manufacture and sale of lawn care
and garden products. The Company's major customers include mass
merchandisers, home improvement centers, large hardware chains,
independent hardware stores, nurseries, garden centers, food and drug
stores, golf courses, professional sports stadiums, lawn and landscape
service companies, commercial nurseries and greenhouses, and specialty
crop growers. Scotts products are sold in the United States, Canada,
the United Kingdom, continental Europe, Southeast Asia, the Middle East,
Africa, Australia, New Zealand, and several Latin American countries.

BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of The Scotts
Company ("Scotts") and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Hyponex
Corporation ("Hyponex"), Republic Tool and Manufacturing Corp.
("Republic"), Scotts-Sierra Horticultural Products Company ("Sierra")
and Scotts' Miracle-Gro Products, Inc. ("Miracle-Gro"), (collectively,
the "Company"). All material intercompany transactions have been
eliminated.

USE OF ESTIMATES

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated
financial statements and accompanying disclosures. The most significant
of these estimates are related to the allowance for doubtful accounts,
inventory valuation reserves, marketing promotional and consumer rebate
liabilities, income taxes and contingencies. Although these estimates
are based on management's best knowledge of current events and actions
the Company may undertake in the future, actual results ultimately may
differ from the estimates.

ACCOUNTING CHANGES

In 1996, the Company adopted SFAS No. 121, "Accounting for the
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed
Of", which requires review for possible impairment whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset
may not be recoverable. Although the Company's previous policies were
in accordance with SFAS No. 121, the guidelines of this pronouncement
were applied in determining certain of the unusual charges recorded in
fiscal 1996; see Note 2.

INVENTORIES

Inventories are principally stated at the lower of cost or market,
determined by the FIFO method; certain inventories of Hyponex (primarily
organic products) are accounted for by the LIFO method. At September
30, 1995 and 1996, approximately 25% and 15% of inventories,
respectively, are valued at the lower of LIFO cost or market.
Inventories include the cost of raw materials, labor and manufacturing
overhead.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


The Company makes provisions for obsolete or slow-moving inventories as
necessary to properly reflect inventory value. Inventories, net of
provisions of $6,711,000 and $8,666,000 as of September 30, 1995 and 1996,
respectively, consisted of:

(in thousands) 1995 1996
---- ----

Finished Goods $ 72,551 $ 96,690
Raw Materials 71,624 51,942
------- -------
FIFO Cost 144,175 148,632

LIFO Reserve (222) 204
------- -------

$ 143,953 $ 148,836
------- -------
------- -------


REVENUE RECOGNITION

Revenue generally is recognized when products are shipped. For certain large
multi-location customers, revenue is recognized when products are shipped to
intermediate locations and ownership is acknowledged by the customer.

ADVERTISING, PROMOTION AND CONSUMER GUARANTEE

The Company advertises its branded products through national and regional
media, and through cooperative advertising programs with retailers. Retailers
are also offered pre-season stocking and in-store promotion allowances.
Certain products are also promoted with direct consumer rebate programs.
Costs for these advertising and promotion programs are charged to marketing
expense as incurred or expensed ratably over the year in relation to
revenues. Advertising and promotion costs were $38,341,000, $58,470,000 and
$64,930,000 in 1994, 1995 and 1996, respectively.

The Company expenses and establishes a liability for its consumer product "no
quibble" guarantee program by applying an experience rate to sales in the
period eligible product is shipped to retailers. Consumer guarantee costs
were $778,000, $920,000 and $1,227,000 in 1994, 1995 and 1996, respectively.

INVESTMENTS IN UNCONSOLIDATED BUSINESSES

The Company's investments in affiliated companies which are not majority
owned or controlled are accounted for using the equity method.

PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

Property, plant and equipment, including significant improvements, are stated
at cost. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to operating
expenses as incurred. When properties are retired, or otherwise disposed of,
the cost of the asset and the related accumulated depreciation are removed
from the accounts.

Depletion of applicable land is computed on the units-of-production method.
Depreciation of other property, plant and equipment is provided on the
straight-line method and is based on the estimated useful economic lives of
the assets as follows:

Land improvements 10-25 years
Buildings 10-40 years
Machinery and equipment 3-15 years
Furniture and fixtures 6-10 years
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


Property, plant and equipment at September 30, 1995 and 1996 consisted of
the following:

(in thousands)
1995 1996
--------- ---------
Land and improvements $ 27,796 $ 28,399
Buildings 45,032 44,327
Machinery and equipment 136,213 137,814
Furniture and fixtures 10,262 11,479
Software - 1,845
Construction in progress 11,916 10,433
------- -------
231,219 234,297
Less accumulated depreciation 82,465 94,809
------- -------
$ 148,754 $ 139,488
------- -------
------- -------

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

Significant costs are incurred each year in connection with research and
development programs that are expected to contribute to operating profits in
future years. All costs associated with research and development are charged
to expense as incurred.

INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Goodwill arising from business acquisitions is amortized over 40 years on a
straight-line basis. Other intangible assets consist primarily of patents
and debt issuance costs. Debt issuance costs are being amortized over the
terms of the corresponding agreements. Patents and trademarks are being
amortized on a straight-line basis over periods varying from 7 to 40 years.
Accumulated amortization at September 30, 1995 and 1996 was $52,182,000 and
$55,773,000, respectively.

During the year ended September 30, 1994, the Company capitalized $5,100,000
of debt issuance costs related to the issuance of Term Debt and 9 7/8% Senior
Subordinated Notes and recognized an extraordinary charge of $992,000, net of
income taxes of $662,000, for unamortized debt issuance costs in connection
with certain debt prepayments. During the year ended September 30, 1995, the
Company capitalized approximately $500,000 of debt issuance costs related to
its Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement.

Company management periodically assesses the recoverability of goodwill,
trademarks and other intangible assets by determining whether the
amortization of such assets over the remaining lives can be recovered through
projected undiscounted net cash flows generated by such assets. In 1995,
goodwill was reduced by $3,485,000 related to the disposition of the Peters
U.S. consumer water-soluble fertilizer ("CWSF") business.

FOREIGN CURRENCY

The Company enters into forward foreign exchange and currency options
contracts to hedge its exposure to fluctuation in foreign currency exchange
rates. These contracts generally involve the exchange of one currency for a
second currency at some future date. Counterparties to these contracts are
major financial institutions. Gains and losses on these contracts generally
offset gains and losses on the assets, liabilities and transactions being
hedged.

Realized and unrealized foreign exchange gains and losses are recognized and
offset foreign exchange gains or losses on the underlying exposures.
Unrealized gains and losses that are designated and effective as hedges on
such transactions are deferred and recognized in operations in the same
period as the hedged transactions.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


At September 30, 1996, the Company's European operations had foreign
exchange risk in various European currencies tied to the Dutch
guilder. These currencies are the Australian Dollar, Belgian Franc,
German Mark, Spanish Peseta, French Franc, British Pound, Italian
Lire and the U.S. Dollar. The Company's U.S. operations have
foreign exchange rate risk in the Canadian Dollar, the Dutch Guilder
and the British Pound which are tied to the U.S. Dollar. As of
September 30, 1996, the Company had outstanding forward foreign
exchange contracts with a contract value of approximately
$16,585,000. These contracts have maturity dates ranging from
October 29, 1996 to June 10, 1997.

All assets and liabilities in the balance sheets of foreign
subsidiaries whose functional currency is other than the U.S. dollar
are translated into United States dollar equivalents at year-end
exchange rates. Translation gains and losses are accumulated as a
separate component of shareholders' equity. Income and expense
items are translated at average monthly exchange rates. Cumulative
foreign currency translation gain was $4,082,000 and $2,151,000 as
of September 30, 1995 and 1996, respectively. Foreign currency
transaction gains and losses are included in determining net income.
In fiscal 1994, 1995 and 1996 the Company recorded foreign currency
transaction losses in other expenses of $168,000, $337,000 and
$1,249,000, respectively. The cash flows related to these gains and
losses are classified in the statement of cash flows, as part of
cash flows from operating activities.

INCOME TAXES

The Company uses the liability method of accounting for income taxes.
Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are
determined based on the difference between the financial statement
and tax bases of the assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates.

NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE

Net income (loss) per common share is based on the weighted-average
number of common shares and common share equivalents (dilutive stock
options, convertible preferred stock and warrants) outstanding each
period.

2. UNUSUAL (INCOME) CHARGES

During 1996, the Company recorded $17,703,000 of unusual,
non-recurring charges as part of management's plan to reduce costs,
improve operating efficiencies and return to future profitable
growth. This program was substantially completed as of September
30, 1996 and includes the cost of exiting certain facilities, asset
impairments due to production and product realignments, and employee
severance costs. These unusual charges included: (1) $4,898,000 for
severance costs related to the termination of 120 associates; (2)
$3,456,000 for previously deferred packaging costs for products that
are being eliminated or for planned packaging changes; and (3)
$9,349,000 related to the write-down of various under-utilized or
idle assets, including several plant closings. As of September 30,
1996 approximately $2,247,000 remained in accrued liabilities
related to these charges. It is anticipated the remaining balance
will be disbursed by the end of fiscal 1997.

In addition, the Company recorded inventory writedowns of $3,084,000
for products that are being phased out as part of the Company's plan
to simplify and rationalize its product lines.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

In the fourth quarter of 1995, the Company divested its Peters
CWSF business for approximately $9,966,000. The gain on the
divestiture was approximately $4,227,000. In connection with this
transaction, the Company entered into a supply agreement through
August 1997, in which the Company will produce all product
requirements for the buyer at cost plus an agreed upon profit
charge. The transaction was pursuant to a Federal Trade Commission
("FTC") consent order which the Company entered into in connection
with its merger transactions with the Miracle-Gro Companies.

3. MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS

SIERRA

Effective December 16, 1993, the Company completed the acquisition
of Grace-Sierra Horticultural Products Company (all further
references to Grace-Sierra, now known as Scotts-Sierra Horticultural
Products Company, will be made as "Sierra") for an aggregate
purchase price of approximately $121,221,000, including transaction
costs of $1,221,000. Additionally, the Company incurred $2,261,000
of deferred financing fees related to its financing of the
acquisition. Sierra is a leading international manufacturer and
marketer of specialty fertilizers and related products for the
nursery, greenhouse, golf course and consumer markets. Sierra
manufactures controlled-release fertilizers in the United States and
the Netherlands, as well as water-soluble fertilizers and specialty
organics in the United States. Approximately one-quarter of
Sierra's net sales are derived from European and other international
markets; approximately one-quarter of Sierra's assets are
internationally based.

The acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method.
Accordingly, the purchase price has been allocated to the assets
acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair
values at the date of acquisition. The excess of purchase price
over the estimated fair value of the net assets acquired
("goodwill") of approximately $65,755,000 is being amortized on a
straight-line basis over 40 years. Sierra's results of operations
have been included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations from
the acquisition date.

MIRACLE-GRO

Effective May 19, 1995, the Company completed merger transactions
with Stern's Miracle-Gro Products, Inc. ("Miracle-Gro Products") and
affiliated companies (the "Miracle-Gro Companies") for an aggregate
purchase price of approximately $195,689,000. The consideration was
comprised of $195,000,000 face amount of Class A Convertible
Preferred Stock of Scotts with a fair value of $177,255,000,
warrants to purchase 3,000,000 common shares of Scotts with a fair
value of $14,434,000 and approximately $4,000,000 of transaction
costs. The Preferred Stock has a dividend yield of 5.0% and is
convertible into common shares of Scotts at $19.00 per share. The
warrants are exercisable for 1,000,000 common shares at $21.00 per
share, 1,000,000 common shares at $25.00 per share and 1,000,000
common shares at $29.00 per share. The fair value of the warrants
has been included in capital in excess of par value in the Company's
Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The Miracle-Gro Companies are engaged in the marketing and
distribution of plant foods and lawn and garden products primarily
in the United States, Canada and Europe. On December 31, 1994,
Miracle-Gro Products Limited ("MG Limited"), a subsidiary of
Miracle-Gro, entered into an agreement to exchange its equipment and
a license for distribution of Miracle-Gro products in certain areas
of Europe for approximately a one-third equity interest in a U.K.
based garden products company. The initial period of the license is
five years and may be extended up to twenty years from January 1,
1995, under certain circumstances set forth in the license
agreement. MG Limited is entitled to annual royalties for the first
five years of the license.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


The FTC, in granting permission for the acquisition of the Miracle-Gro
Companies, required that the Company divest its Peters CWSF business.

The merger transactions with the Miracle-Gro Companies have been
accounted for using the purchase method. Accordingly, the purchase
price has been allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities
assumed based on their estimated fair values at the date of the
acquisition. The excess of purchase price over the estimated fair
values of the net assets acquired ("goodwill") of approximately
$87,182,000 and trademarks of $90,000,000 are being amortized on a
straight-line basis over 40 years. The Miracle-Gro Companies'
results of operations have been included in the Consolidated
Statements of Operations from the acquisition date of May 19, 1995.

The following pro forma results of operations give effect to the
above Miracle-Gro Companies merger transactions as if it had
occurred on October 1, 1994.

(in thousands, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)


Year ended
September 30,
1995
------------
Net sales $821,189
--------
--------
Net income $ 32,943
--------
--------

Net income per common share $ 1.13
--------
--------


For purposes of computing pro forma net income per common share, the
Class A Convertible Preferred Stock is considered a common share
equivalent. Pro forma primary net income per common share for the
year ended September 30, 1995 is calculated using the weighted
average common shares outstanding for Scotts of 22,617,000, and the
common shares that would have been issued assuming conversion of
Class A Convertible Preferred Stock at the beginning of the year to
10,263,000 common shares. The computation of pro forma primary net
income per common share assuming reduction of net income for
preferred dividends and no conversion of Class A Convertible
Preferred Stock was anti-dilutive.

The pro forma information provided does not purport to be
indicative of actual results of operations if the Miracle-Gro
Companies acquisition had occurred as of October 1, 1994 and is not
intended to be indicative of future results or trends.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



4. OTHER INCOME, NET

Other income, net consisted of the following:

(in thousands) Year ended September 30,
1994 1995 1996
---- ---- ----

Foreign currency loss $ 168 $ 337 $ 1,249
Royalty income (1,726) (857) (968)
Equity in (income) loss of
unconsolidated businesses - 1,216 (493)
Other 208 (859) (346)
--------- ------- --------
Total $ (1,350) $ (163) $ (558)
--------- ------- --------
--------- ------- --------

5. PENSION

Scotts and Sierra have defined benefit pension plans covering
substantially all full-time associates who have completed one year
of eligible service and reached the age of 21. The benefits under
these plans are based on years of service and the associates'
average final compensation for the Scotts plan and for Sierra
salaried employees and stated amounts for Sierra hourly employees.
The Company's funding policy, consistent with statutory requirements
and tax considerations, is based on actuarial computations using the
Projected Unit Credit method.

The following table sets forth the plans' funded status and the
related amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
<TABLE>
SEPTEMBER 30
------------------------------------
(in thousands) 1995 1996
-------------------- ----
Over- Under-
funded funded
Plans Plan
----- ------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Actuarial present value of benefit obligations:
Accumulated benefit obligation:
Vested benefits $(31,436) $(1,593) $(35,677)
Nonvested benefits (5,241) (496) (7,223)
Additional obligation for projected
compensation increases (6,669) (130) (9,358)
-------- ------- --------
Projected benefit obligation for service
rendered to date (43,346) (2,219) (52,258)
Plan assets at fair value, primarily corporate
bonds, U.S. bonds and cash equivalents 40,287 1,468 48,095
-------- ------- --------
Plan assets less than projected benefit
obligations (3,059) (751) (4,163)
Unrecognized net asset being amortized
over 11 1/2 years (297) 16 (157)
Unrecognized net loss 5,197 148 7,004
-------- ------- --------

Prepaid pension costs $ 1,841 $ (587) $ 2,684
-------- ------- --------
-------- ------- --------
</TABLE>

There were no underfunded plans as of September 30, 1996.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


Pension cost includes the following components:

YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30
-------------------------------
(in thousands) 1994 1995 1996
---- ---- ----

Service cost $ 1,685 $ 1,732 $ 1,849
Interest cost 2,968 3,280 3,777
Actual return on plan assets (3,092) (5,104) (4,316)
Net amortization and deferral (53) 2,046 582
-------- -------- --------

Net pension cost $ 1,508 $ 1,954 $ 1,892
-------- -------- --------
-------- -------- --------

The weighted average settlement rate used in determining the
actuarial present value of the projected benefit obligation was 8%
as of September 30, 1994, 1995 and 1996. Future compensation was
assumed to increase 4% annually for fiscal 1994, 1995 and 1996. The
expected long-term rate of return on plan assets was 9% in fiscal
1994, 1995 and 1996.

The Company has a non-qualified supplemental pension plan covering
certain employees, which provides for incremental pension payments
from the Company's funds so that total pension payments equal
amounts that would have been payable from the Company's pension
plans if it were not for limitations imposed by income tax
regulations. The projected benefit obligation relating to this
unfunded plan totaled $1,240,000 and $1,922,000 at September 30,
1995 and 1996, respectively. Pension expense for the plan was
$445,000 and $348,000 in 1995 and 1996, respectively.

6. ASSOCIATE BENEFITS

The Company provides comprehensive major medical benefits to some of
its retired associates and their dependents. Substantially all of
the Company's associates become eligible for these benefits if they
retire at age 55 or older with more than ten years of service. The
plan requires certain minimum contributions from retired associates
and includes provisions to limit the overall cost increases the
Company is required to cover. The Company funds its portion of
retiree medical benefits on a pay-as-you-go basis.

Prior to October 1, 1993, the Company effected several changes in
plan provisions, primarily related to current and ultimate levels of
retiree and dependent contributions. Current retirees will be
entitled to benefits existing prior to these plan changes. These
plan changes resulted in a reduction in unrecognized prior service
cost, which is being amortized over future years.

Net periodic postretirement benefit costs for fiscal 1995 and 1996
included the following components:

1995 1996
(in thousands) ---- ----

Service cost - benefits attributed to associate
service during the year $ 428 $ 433
Interest cost on accumulated postretirement
benefit obligation 1,446 1,478
Amortization of prior service costs and gains
from changes in assumptions (904) (904)
-------- -------
Net periodic postretirement benefit costs $ 970 $ 1,007
======== =======
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The following table sets forth the retiree medical plan status reconciled
to the amount included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, as of September
30, 1995 and 1996.

1995 1996
---- ----
(in thousands)

Accumulated postretirement benefit obligation:
Retirees $10,034 $10,589
Fully eligible active plan participants 395 187
Other active plan participants 9,071 7,296
------- -------
Total accumulated postretirement
benefit obligation 19,500 18,072
Unrecognized prior service cost 7,686 6,782
Unrecognized gain (loss) from
changes in assumptions (27) 2,303
------- -------
Accrued postretirement benefit cost $27,159 $27,157
======= =======

The discount rates used in determining the accumulated postretirement
benefit obligation were 8.0% in 1995 and 1996. For measurement purposes,
a 12% annual rate of increase in per capita cost of covered retiree medical
benefits was assumed for fiscal 1995 and a 9% annual rate for 1996; the rate
was assumed to decrease gradually to 5.5% through the year 2004 and remain
at that level thereafter. A 1% increase in the health care cost trend rate
assumptions would increase the aggregate of the service and interest cost
components of net periodic postretirement benefit costs by $123,000 and
increase the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation $1,193,000 as of
September 30, 1996.

Both Scotts and Hyponex have defined contribution profit sharing plans. Both
plans provide for associates to become participants following one year of
service. The Hyponex plan also requires associates to have reached the age
of 21 for participation. The plans provide for annual contributions which
are entirely at the discretion of the respective Board of Directors.

Contributions are allocated among the participants employed as of the last
day of the calendar year, based upon participants' earnings. Each
participant's share of the annual contributions vest according to the
provisions of the plans. The Company has provided a profit sharing provision
for the plans of $2,097,000, $1,498,000 and $930,000 for fiscal 1994, 1995
and 1996, respectively. The Company's policy is to deposit the contributions
with the trustee in the following year.

Sierra has a savings and investment plan ("401(k) Plan") for certain salaried
U.S. employees. Participants may make voluntary contributions to the plan
between 2% and 16% of their compensation. Sierra contributes the lesser of
50% of each participant's contribution or 3% of each participant's
compensation. Sierra's contribution for 1995 and 1996 were $70,000 and
$56,600, respectively.

The Company is self-insured for certain health benefits up to $200,000 per
occurrence per individual. The cost of such benefits is recognized as
expense in the period the claim is incurred. This cost was $6,177,000,
$7,861,000 and $9,385,000 in 1994, 1995 and 1996, respectively. The Company
is self-insured for State of Ohio workers' compensation up to $500,000 per
claim. The cost for workers' compensation was $297,000, $331,000 and
$193,000 in 1994, 1995 and 1996, respectively. Claims in excess of stated
limits of liability and claims for workers' compensation outside of the
State of Ohio are insured with commercial carriers.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

7. DEBT
(in thousands)
1995 1996
---- ----

Revolving credit lines $172,597 $125,750
9 7/8% Senior Subordinated Notes $100 million
face amount due 2004 99,307 99,378
Capital lease obligations and other 639 197
-------- --------
272,543 225,325
Less current portions 518 2,197
-------- --------
$272,025 $223,128
======== ========

Maturities of term debt for the next five calendar years are as follows:
(in thousands)
1997 $ 2,197
1998 -
1999 -
2000 123,750
2001 -
Thereafter 100,000

On March 17, 1995, the Company entered into the Fourth Amended and Restated
Credit Agreement ("Agreement") with Chemical Bank ("Chemical") and various
participating banks. The Agreement provides, on an unsecured basis, up to
$375,000,000 to the Company, comprised of an uncommitted advance facility
and a committed revolving credit facility through the scheduled termination
date of March 31, 2000. The Agreement contains a requirement limiting the
maximum amount borrowed to $225,000,000 million for a minimum of 30
consecutive days each fiscal year.

Interest pursuant to the commercial paper/competitive advance facility is
determined by auction. Interest pursuant to the revolving credit facility
is at a floating rate initially equal, at the Company's option, to the
Alternate Base Rate as defined in the Agreement without additional margin
or the Eurodollar Rate as defined in the Agreement plus a margin of .3125%
per annum, which margin may be decreased to .25% or increased up to .625%
based on the changes in the unsecured debt ratings of the Company.
Applicable interest rates for the various borrowing facilities ranged from
5.77% to 8.25% at September 30, 1996. The Agreement provides for the
payment of an annual administration fee of $100,000 and a facility fee of
.1875% per annum, which fee may be reduced to .15% or increased up to .375%
based on the unsecured debt ratings of the Company.

The Agreement contains certain financial and operating covenants, including
maintenance of interest coverage ratios, maintenance of consolidated net
worth, and restrictions on additional indebtedness and capital
expenditures. Dividends and stock repurchases are restricted only in the
event of default. The Company was not in compliance with one of the
financial covenants at September 30, 1996 and accordingly, has received a
waiver with respect to such covenant from its bank lenders, subject to
achievement of other minimum requirements, for applicable periods up to and
including December 28, 1996. In the opinion of management, the Company
will be in compliance with the covenant in the reporting period subsequent
to December 28, 1996; however, there can be no assurance that in the future
the Company will not require additional waivers or, if required, that the
lenders will grant them.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

At September 30, 1996, the Company also had an unsecured $2,000,000 line of
credit with a bank, renewable annually, with an interest rate of 8.25%, of
which $97,000 and $2,000,000 was outstanding at September 30, 1995 and
1996, respectively.

On July 19, 1994, the Company issued $100,000,000 9 7/8% Senior
Subordinated Notes. Net proceeds were $96,354,000, after original issue
discount of $788,000 and expenses of $2,858,000. The Notes are subject to
redemption, at the option of the Company, in whole or in part at any time
on or after August 1, 1999 at a declining premium to par until 2001 and at
par thereafter and are not subject to sinking fund requirements. The fair
market value of the 9 7/8% Senior Subordinated Notes, estimated based on
the quoted market prices for same or similar issues was approximately
$104,500,000 at September 30, 1996.

8. SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY

STOCK
-----
(in thousands) 1995 1996
---- ----
Class A Convertible Preferred Stock,
no par value:
Authorized 195,000 shares 195,000 shares
Issued 195,000 shares 195,000 shares
Common shares, no par value
Authorized 50,000 shares 50,000 shares
Issued 21,082 shares 21,082 shares

Effective with the Miracle-Gro Companies merger transactions, $195,000,000
face amount of Class A Convertible Preferred Stock was issued as part of
the purchase price. This Preferred Stock is convertible into 10,263,158
common shares at $19.00 per common share. Additionally, warrants to
purchase 3,000,000 common shares of Scotts were issued as part of the
purchase price. The warrants are exercisable for 1,000,000 common shares
at $21.00 per share, 1,000,000 common shares at $25.00 per share and
1,000,000 common shares at $29.00 per share. The exercise term for the
warrants expires September 2003. The fair value of the warrants has been
included in capital in excess of par value in the Company's Consolidated
Balance Sheets.

The Class A Convertible Preferred Stock has certain voting restrictions and
limits on the ability of the shareholders to acquire additional voting
securities of the Company. The Class A Convertible Preferred Stock is
subject to redemption five years from the date of issuance. Both the Class
A Convertible Preferred Stock and the warrants have limits on
transferability.

On November 4, 1992, Scotts adopted The Scotts Company 1992 Long Term
Incentive Plan (the "Plan"). The Plan was approved by the shareholders at
Scotts' annual meeting on February 25, 1993. Under the Plan, stock
options, stock appreciation rights and performance share awards may be
granted to officers and other key employees of the Company. The Plan also
provides for Board members, who are not Company associates to receive stock
options. The maximum number of common shares that may be issued under the
Plan is 1,700,000, plus the number of shares surrendered to exercise
options (other than director options) granted under the Plan, up to a
maximum of 1,000,000 surrendered shares.

On February 12, 1996, Scotts adopted The Scotts Company 1996 Stock Option
Plan (the "1996 Plan"). The 1996 Plan was approved by the shareholders at
Scotts annual meeting on April 6, 1996. Under the 1996 Plan, stock options
may be granted to officers, other key employees and non-employee Directors
of the Company. The maximum number of common shares that may be issued
under the 1996 Plan is 1,500,000.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



Aggregate stock option activity consists of the following:

YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
------------------------
1994 1995 1996
---- ---- ----
Options outstanding at October 1 586,289 1,364,589 1,662,125
Options granted 942,354 435,420 482,000
Options exercised (8,529) (26,870) (429,558)
Options canceled (155,525) (111,014) (168,551)
--------- --------- ---------
Options outstanding at
September 30 1,364,589 1,662,125 1,546,016
--------- --------- ---------
--------- --------- ---------
Options exercisable at
September 30 204,422 575,938 1,150,688
--------- --------- ---------
--------- --------- ---------
Option prices per share:
Granted $17.25-$19.375 $15.50-$21.375 $17.00-$22.00
============== ============== =============
Exercised $18.75 $16.25 $15.50-$17.625
============== ============== =============

During fiscal 1994, 117,220 of performance share awards were granted.
These awards entitle the grantee to receive shares or, at the grantee's
election, the equivalent value in cash or stock options, subject to stock
ownership requirements. These awards are conditioned on the attainment of
certain performance and other objectives established by the Compensation
and Organization Committee of Scotts' Board of Directors.

Compensation expense for certain stock options results from the difference
between the grant price and market price at the date of grant, and is
recognized over the vesting period of the options. Compensation expense
for performance share awards is initially measured at the grant date based
upon the current market value of the common shares, with adjustments made
quarterly for market price fluctuations. In 1995, the Plan was amended to
cancel outstanding performance share awards. Previously recognized
compensation of $300,000 was recognized as a reduction of compensation
expense.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


9. EARNINGS PER SHARE COMPUTATION

Net income per common share is based on the weighted average number of
common shares and common share equivalents (dilutive stock options,
convertible preferred stock and warrants) outstanding each period.

The following table presents information necessary to calculate net income
per common share.

YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
--------------------------------------
(in thousands) 1994 1995 1996
---- ---- ----
Net income (loss)
Net income (loss) before
extraordinary item $23,875 $22,356 $ (2,530)
Extraordinary item
Loss on early extinguishment
of debt, net of tax (992) - -
------- ------- --------
Net income (loss) 22,883 22,356 (2,530)
Class A Convertible Preferred
Stock dividends - - (9,750)
------- ------- --------
Income (loss) applicable to common
shareholders $22,883 $22,356 $(12,280)
------- ------- --------
------- ------- --------

Weighted average common shares
outstanding during the period 18,663 18,670 18,786
Assuming conversion of Class A
convertible Preferred Stock - 3,706 -
Assuming exercise of options
using the Treasury Stock Method 122 230
Assuming exercise of warrants
using the Treasury Stock Method - 11 -
------- ------- --------
Common shares used in per share
calculation 18,785 22,617 18,786
------- ------- --------
------- ------- --------

Net income (loss) per common share
Net income (loss) before
extraordinary item $ 1.27 $ 0.99 $ (0.65)
Extraordinary item:
Loss on early extinguishment
of debt, net of tax (0.05) - -
------- ------- -------
Net income (loss) per common
share $ 1.22 $ 0.99 $ (0.65)
------- ------- -------
------- ------- -------

The shares of Class A Convertible Preferred Stock were issued in connection
with Miracle-Gro merger transactions on May 19, 1995. These shares were
not considered in the earnings per share computation for the year ended
September 30, 1996 because they were antidilutive for such period.

For 1994, 1995 and 1996, fully diluted net income per common share is
considered to be the same as primary net income per common share as it was
not materially different from primary net income per common share.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


10. INCOME TAXES

The provision for income taxes consists of the following:

YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
--------------------------------------
(in thousands) 1994 1995 1996
---- ---- ----
Currently Payable:
Federal $ 7,400 $ 9,373 $ 4,218
State 2,131 2,634 2,533
Foreign 2,376 4,487 2,759
Deferred:
Federal 4,290 (2,220) (5,076)
State 1,088 (376) (652)
------- ------- -------

Income Tax Expense $17,285 $13,898 $ 3,782
------- ------- -------
------- ------- -------

Income tax expense is included in the financial statements as follows:

YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
(in thousands) 1994 1995 1996
---- ---- ----
Operations $17,947 $13,898 $3,782
Extraordinary items (662) - -
------- ------- ------

Income Tax Expense $17,285 $13,898 $3,782
------- ------- ------
------- ------- ------

Deferred income taxes for fiscal 1995 and 1996 reflect the impact of
differences between the amounts of assets and liabilities for financial
reporting purposes and such amounts as determined by tax regulations.

The components of the net deferred tax asset (liability) are as follows:

(in thousands) SEPTEMBER 30,
--------------------
1995 1996
---- ----
ASSETS
Accounts receivable $ 1,024 $ 1,023
Inventories 3,453 5,601
Accrued expenses 9,181 10,432
Postretirement benefits 10,633 10,727
Other 4,776 4,526
-------- --------

Gross deferred tax assets $ 29,067 $ 32,309
-------- --------

LIABILITIES
Property, plant and equipment (18,288) (19,114)
-------- --------

Net deferred tax asset $ 10,779 $ 13,195
-------- --------
-------- --------
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


The net current and non-current components of deferred income taxes
recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30 are:

(in thousands) 1995 1996
---- ----

Net current asset $14,563 $18,386
Net non-current liability (3,784) (5,191)
------- -------

Net asset $10,779 $13,195
------- -------

A reconciliation of the Federal corporate income tax rate and the effective
tax rate on income before income taxes is summarized below:

YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
--------------------------------------
1994 1995 1996
---- ---- ----

Statutory income tax rate 35.0% 35.0% 35.0%
Pension amortization 0.1 0.1 6.3
Meals and entertainment 0.5 0.9 17.6
Peters sale - (3.0) -
Goodwill amortization and other
permanent differences resulting
from purchase accounting 2.1 3.4 206.9
State taxes, net of federal benefit 5.6 4.4 97.6
Reversal of previous tax contingencies - (3.9) (42.0)
Equity income of affiliate - 0.7 (13.8)
Other (0.4) 0.7 (5.3)
---- ---- -----

Effective income tax rate 42.9% 38.3% 302.3%
---- ---- -----
---- ---- -----
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


11. OPERATING LEASES

The Company leases buildings, land and equipment under various
noncancellable lease agreements for periods of two to six years. The lease
agreements generally provide that the Company pay taxes, insurance and
maintenance expenses related to the leased assets. Certain lease
agreements contain purchase options. At September 30, 1996, future minimum
lease payments were as follows:

Year Ending Operating
September 30, Leases
(in thousands)
-------------- ---------

1997 $10,770
1998 8,664
1999 4,966
2000 2,745
2001 310
Thereafter 147
-------
Total minimum lease payments $27,602
-------
-------

The Company also leases transportation and production equipment under
various one-year operating leases, which provide for the extension of the
initial term on a monthly or annual basis. Total rental expenses for
operating leases were $12,914,000, $14,660,000 and $13,989,000 for fiscal
1994, 1995 and 1996, respectively.

12. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Seed production agreements obligate the Company to make future purchases
based on estimated yields. Seed purchases under production agreements for
fiscal 1994, 1995 and 1996 were approximately $6,508,000, $6,935,000 and
$11,401,000 respectively. At September 30, 1996, estimated annual
commitments were as follows:

Year Ending
September 30,
(in thousands)
--------------
1997 $16,246
1998 11,656
1999 6,089
2000 3,686
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The Company has entered into a long-term contract through 2000 for the
purchase of certain raw materials. Purchase commitments are approximately
$15 million annually.

Sierra has a supply agreement through 2000, subject to renewal thereafter,
under which Sierra is required to purchase, at prices determined by
formulas, 100% of its requirements for vermiculite.

Management continually evaluates the Company's contingencies, including
various lawsuits and claims which arise in the normal course of business.
In the opinion of management, its assessment of contingencies is reasonable
and related reserves, in the aggregate, are adequate, however, there can be
no assurance that future quarterly or annual operating results will not be
materially affected by final resolution of these matters. The following
details the more significant of the Company's identified contingencies.

In September 1991, the Company was identified by the Ohio Environmental
Protection Agency (the "Ohio EPA") as a Potentially Responsible Party
("PRP") with respect to a site in Union County, Ohio (the "Hershberger
site") that has allegedly been contaminated by hazardous substances whose
transportation, treatment of disposal the Company allegedly arranged.
Pursuant to a consent order with the Ohio EPA, the Company, together with
four other PRP's identified to date, investigated the extent of
contamination in the Hershberger site. The results of the investigation
were that the site presents a low degree of risk and that the chemical
compounds which contribute to the risk are not compounds used by the
Company. However, as a result of the joint and several liability of PRP's,
the Company may be subject to financial participation in the costs of the
remediation plan, if any. However, management does not believe any such
obligations would have a significant adverse effect on the Company's
results of operations or financial condition.

In July 1990, the Philadelphia district of the Army Corps of Engineers
directed that peat harvesting operations be discontinued at Hyponex's
Lafayette, New Jersey facility, and the Company complied. In May 1992, the
Department of Justice in the U.S. District Court for the District of New
Jersey, filed suit seeking a permanent injunction against such harvesting
at that facility and civil penalties. The Philadelphia District of the
Corps has taken the position that peat harvesting activities there require
a permit under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. If the Corps' position
is upheld, it is possible that further harvesting of peat from this
facility would be prohibited. The Company is defending this suit and is
asserting a right to recover its economic losses resulting from the
government's actions. Management does not believe that the outcome of this
case will have a material adverse effect on the Company's operations or its
financial condition. Furthermore, management believes the Company has
sufficient raw material supplies available such that service to customers
will not be adversely affected by continued closure of this peat harvesting
operation.

On January 30, 1996, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (the
"U.S. EPA") served a Complaint and Notice of Opportunity for Hearing upon
Sierra's wholly-owned subsidiary, Scotts-Sierra Crop Protection Company
("Crop Protection"). The Complaint alleged labeling violations under the
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act ("FIFRA") during 1992
and 1993 and proposed
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

penalties totaling $785,000, the maximum allowable under FIFRA according to
management's calculations. Presently pending is the U.S. EPA's Motion for
an Accelerated Decision. Based upon Crop Protection's good faith
compliance actions and FIFRA's provisions for "gravity-based" penalty
reductions, management believes Crop Protection's maximum liability in this
action to be $200,000. The Company does not believe that the outcome of
this proceeding will have a material adverse effect on its financial
condition or results of operations.

During 1993 and 1994, Stern's Miracle-Gro Products, Inc. ("Miracle-Gro
Products") discussed with Pursell Industries, Inc. ("Pursell") the
feasibility of forming a joint venture to produce and market a line of
slow-release lawn food, and in October 1993, signed a non-binding "heads of
agreement.". On March 2, 1995, Pursell instituted an action in the United
States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, PURSELL
INDUSTRIES, INC. V. STERN'S MIRACLE-GRO PRODUCTS, INC., (the "Alabama
Action"), alleging, among other things, that a joint venture was formed,
that Miracle-Gro Products breached an alleged joint venture contract,
committed fraud, and breached an alleged fiduciary duty owned Pursell by
not informing Pursell of negotiations concerning the merger transactions.
On December 18, 1995, Pursell filed an amended complaint in which Scotts
was named as an additional party defendant. The amended complaint contains
a number of allegations and seeks compensatory damages in excess of $10
million, punitive damages of $20 million, treble damages as allowed by law
and injunctive relief with respect to the advertising and trade dress
allegations. The Company does not believe that the amended complaint has
any merit and intends to vigorously defend that action.

On April 14, 1996, in response to communications from Scotts that Pursell
was infringing the Company's Poly-S patents, Pursell instituted a second
action in the United States District Court for the Northern District of
Alabama, PURSELL INDUSTRIES, INC. V. THE SCOTTS COMPANY, (the "Patent
Action"). The complaint seeks declaration that, among other things,
Scotts' patents are invalid and that Pursell has not infringed any of
Scotts' patents. Pursell also alleges unfair competition in relation to
Scotts' working of its products with its Poly-S patents. The Company does
not believe that this action has merit and has vigorously defended it,
adding counterclaims of infringement against Pursell.

Pursell and the Company have been engaged in settlement negotiations since
October , 1996 in an effort to settle both the Alabama Acton and the Patent
Action.

Management does not believe either the Alabama Action or the Patent Action
will have a significant adverse effect on the Company's results of
operation or financial condition.

13. SUBSEQUENT EVENT

The Company has signed a letter of intent to acquire the remaining
ownership interests of the Miracle Garden Care Ltd. ("MGC Ltd.") business;
Scotts currently owns approximately one-third interest in this business.
MGC Ltd. is principally engaged in the manufacture and sale of lawn and
garden products in the United Kingdom. Closing of this transaction is
expected to occur during the Company's second quarter of fiscal 1997.

14. CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK

Financial instruments which potentially subject the Company to
concentration of credit risk consist principally of trade accounts
receivable. The Company sells its consumer products to a wide variety of
retailers, including mass merchandisers, home centers, independent hardware
stores, nurseries, garden outlets, warehouse clubs and local and regional
chains. Professional products are sold to golf courses, schools and
sports fields, nurseries, lawn care service companies and growers of
specialty agriculture crops.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

In 1994, one customer accounted for 15.1% of consolidated net sales. In
1995 and 1996, two customers account for 14.4% and 13.1% and 15.1% and
13.9%, respectively, of consolidated net sales.

15. ACCOUNTING ISSUES

In October 1995, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No.
123 "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation", effective for financial
statements for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 1995. SFAS No.
123 provides for, but does not require, a fair value method of accounting
for stock-based compensation arrangements rather than the intrinsic value
method previously required. Alternatively, entities that retain the
intrinsic value method are required to disclose in the notes to the
financial statements pro forma net income and earnings per share
information as if the fair value method had been applied. The Company does
not intend to adopt the fair value method of SFAS No. 123; therefore, this
standard will not have a material effect on the Company's consolidated
financial statements.

16. QUARTERLY CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)

The following is a summary of the unaudited quarterly(2) results of
operations for fiscal 1995 and 1996 (in thousands except share data):

FISCAL 1995 (1) DECEMBER 31 APRIL 1 JULY 1 SEPTEMBER 30 FULL YEAR
- -------------- ----------- ------- ------ ------------ ---------
Net sales $ 98,019 $236,092 $229,028 $169,698 $732,837
Gross profit 44,499 112,202 108,513 73,254 338,468
Net income (loss) (4,598) 13,793 13,026 135 22,356
Net income (loss)
per common share (.25) .73 .55 (.12) 0.99

Common shares used
in per share
calculation 18,667 18,820 23,580 18,678 22,617


FISCAL 1996 (1) DECEMBER 30 MARCH 30 JUNE 29 SEPTEMBER 30 FULL YEAR
- -------------- ----------- -------- ------- ------------ ---------
Net sales $117,928 $251,224 $247,965 $134,763 $751,880
Gross profit 53,214 116,389 114,843 50,275 334,721
Net income (loss) (7,174) 10,630 7,606 (13,592) (2,530)
Net income (loss)
per common share (.51) .36 .26 (.86) (.65)

Common shares used
in per share
calculation 18,689 29,350 29,352 18,647 18,786



(1) Fiscal 1996 results of operations included $17.7 million of unusual charges
and a $3.1 million inventory writedown on a pretax basis or $13.0 million on
a combined after-tax basis. These items reduced after-tax earnings by $1.1
million, $1.7 million, $1.6 million and $8.6 million in the first, second,
third and fourth quarters, respectively. Fiscal 1995 fourth quarter results
of operations includes a $4.2 million after-tax gain on the divestiture of
the Peters line of U.S. Consumer water-soluble fertilizers. In addition,
fiscal 1995 includes Scotts Miracle-Gro Products and its subsidiaries
("Miracle-Gro Companies") from the merger date of May 19, 1995.

(2) The Company's business is highly seasonal with approximately 65% to 70% of
sales occurring in the second and third fiscal quarters.
REPORT OF MANAGEMENT


Management of The Scotts Company is responsible for the preparation, integrity
and objectivity of the financial information presented in this Annual Report.
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles appropriate in the circumstances and
accordingly, include some amounts that are based on management's best judgments
and estimates.

Management is responsible for maintaining a system of accounting and internal
controls which it believes is adequate to provide reasonable assurance that
assets are safeguarded against loss from unauthorized use or disposition and
that the financial records are reliable for preparing financial statements. The
selection and training of qualified personnel, the establishment and
communication of accounting and administrative policies and procedures, and a
program of internal audits are important elements of these control systems.

The financial statements have been audited by Coopers & Lybrand LLP, independent
accountants, selected by the Board of Directors. The independent accountants
conduct a review of internal accounting controls to the extent required by
generally accepted auditing standards and perform such tests and related
procedures as they deem necessary to arrive at an opinion on the fairness of the
financial statements.

The Board of Directors, through its Audit Committee consisting solely of
non-management directors, meets periodically with management, internal audit
and the independent accountants to discuss internal accounting controls and
auditing and financial reporting matters. The Committee reviews with the
independent auditors the scope and results of the audit effort. Both internal
audit and the independent accountants have free access to the Audit Committee
with or without the presence of management.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


To the Shareholders and Board of
Directors of The Scotts Company


We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of The Scotts
Company and Subsidiaries as of September 30, 1995 and 1996, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, cash flows and changes in shareholders'
equity for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 1996.
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based
on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the consolidated financial position of The Scotts Company
and Subsidiaries as of September 30, 1995 and 1996, and the consolidated results
of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the
period ended September 30, 1996, in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles.






Coopers & Lybrand L. L. P.
Columbus, Ohio

November 15, 1996
NYSE SYMBOL:

The common shares of The Scotts Company trade on The New York Stock Exchange
under the symbol "SMG."

STOCK PRICE PERFORMANCE:

The Scotts Company common stock has been publicly traded since January 31, 1992.
The initial public offering price per share was $19.00.

PRICE RANGE:

Fiscal year ended September 30, 1995

HIGH LOW
First Quarter 16 14 1/4
Second Quarter 19 3/8 15 7/8
Third Quarter 23 18 1/8
Fourth Quarter 23 7/8 20 3/4

Fiscal year ended September 30, 1996

HIGH LOW
First Quarter 21 7/8 18 7/8
Second Quarter 21 1/4 16 1/8
Third Quarter 18 3/4 16 1/2
Fourth Quarter 19 3/8 16 3/4

SHAREHOLDERS:

As of December 1, 1996 there were approximately 6,500 shareholders, including
holders of record and the Company's estimate of beneficial holders.

DIVIDENDS:

The Company has not paid any dividends since the initial public offering of its
common stock. The payment of any future dividends will be determined by the
Board of Directors of the Company in light of conditions then existing,
including the Company's earnings, financial condition and capital requirements,
restriction in financing agreements, business conditions and other factors.
To the Shareholders and Board of
Directors of The Scotts Company

Our report on the consolidated financial statements of The Scotts Company and
Subsidiaries has been incorporated by reference in this form 10-K from
page 55 of the 1996 Annual Report to Shareholders of The Scotts Company. In
connection with our audits of such financial statements, we have also audited
the financial statement schedules listed in the index on page 22 of this
Form 10-K.

In our opinion, the financial statement schedules referred to above, when
considered in relation to the consolidated financial statements taken as a
whole, present fairly, in all material respects, the information required to
be included therein.


Coopers & Lybrand, L.L.P.
Columbus, Ohio

November 15, 1996
THE SCOTTS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE II - VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
for the year ended September 30, 1994

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
COLUMN A COLUMN B COLUMN C COLUMN D COLUMN E
- ------------------------------------ ------------------- -------------------- ------------- -------------
BALANCE AT ADDITIONS CHARGED TO DEDUCTION BALANCE AT
CLASSIFICATION BEGINNING OF PERIOD COSTS AND EXPENSES FROM RESERVES END OF PERIOD
- ------------------------------------ ------------------- -------------------- ------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Valuation and qualifying accounts
deducted from the assets to which
they apply:

Inventory reserve $3,811,000 $2,987,000 $ 690,000 $6,108,000
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Allowance for doubtful accounts $2,511,000 $1,974,000 $1,552,000 $2,933,000
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Other valuation and qualifying account:

Product guarantee $ 130,000 $ 778,000 $ 789,000 $ 119,000
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
</TABLE>
THE SCOTTS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE II - VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
for the year ended September 30, 1995

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
COLUMN A COLUMN B COLUMN C COLUMN D COLUMN E
- ------------------------------------ ------------------- --------------------- ------------- -------------
BALANCE AT ADDITIONS: CHARGED TO DEDUCTION BALANCE AT
CLASSIFICATION BEGINNING OF PERIOD COSTS AND EXPENSES FROM RESERVES END OF PERIOD
- ------------------------------------ ------------------- -------------------- ------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>

Valuation and qualifying accounts
deducted from the assets to which
they apply:

Inventory reserve $6,108,000 $2,986,000 $2,383,000 $6,711,000
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Allowance for doubtful accounts $2,933,000 $2,033,000 $1,560,000 $3,406,000
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Other valuation and qualifying account:

Product guarantee $ 119,000 $ 920,000 $ 933,000 $ 106,000
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------

</TABLE>
THE SCOTTS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE II - VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
for the year ended September 30, 1996


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
COLUMN A COLUMN B COLUMN C COLUMN D COLUMN E
- ------------------------------------ ------------------- -------------------- ------------- -------------
BALANCE AT ADDITIONS CHARGED TO DEDUCTION BALANCE AT
CLASSIFICATION BEGINNING OF PERIOD COSTS AND EXPENSES FROM RESERVES END OF PERIOD
- ------------------------------------ ------------------- -------------------- ------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>

Valuation and qualifying accounts
deducted from the assets to which
they apply:

Inventory reserve $6,711,000 $7,986,000 $6,031,000 $8,666,000
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Allowance for doubtful accounts $3,406,000 $3,363,000 $2,655,000 $4,114,000
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Other valuation and qualifying account:

Product guarantee $ 106,000 $1,227,000 $1,075,000 $ 258,000
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
</TABLE>
THE SCOTTS COMPANY
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
FOR THE
FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996


INDEX TO EXHIBITS


Exhibit No. Description Location
- ---------- ----------- --------

2 Amended and Restated Agreement Incorporated herein by reference
and Plan of Merger, dated as of to the Registrant's Current
May 19, 1995, among Stern's Report on Form 8-K filed with
Miracle-Gro Products, Inc., the Securities and Exchange
Stern's Nurseries, Inc., Commission (the "SEC") on June
Miracle-Gro Lawn Products, Inc., 2, 1995 (File No. 0-19768)
Miracle-Gro Products Limited, [Exhibit 2(b)]
Hagedorn Partnership, L.P., the
general partners of Hagedorn
Partnership, L.P., Horace Hagedorn,
Community Funds, Inc., and John
Kenlon, the Registrant, and ZYX
Corporation

3(a) Amended Articles of Incorporation Incorporated herein by reference
of the Registrant as filed with to the Registrant's Annual Report
the Ohio Secretary of State on Report on Form 10-K for the
September 20, 1994 fiscal year ended September 30,
1994 (File No. 0-19768) [Exhibit
3(a)]

3(b) Certificate of Amendment by Incorporated herein by reference
Shareholders to the Articles of to the Registrant's Quarterly
Incorporation of the Registrant Report on Form 10-Q for the
as filed with the Ohio Secretary fiscal quarter ended April 1,
of State on May 4, 1995 1995 (File No. 0-19768)[Exhibit
4(b)]

3(c) Regulations of the Registrant Incorporated herein by reference
(reflecting amendments adopted by to the Registrant's Quarterly
the shareholders of the Registrant Report on Form 10-Q for the
on April 6, 1995) fiscal quarter ended April 1,
1995 (File No. 0-19768) [Exhibit
4(c)]

4(a) Form of Series A Warrant Included in Exhibit 2 above

4(b) Form of Series B Warrant Included in Exhibit 2 above

4(c) Form of Series C Warrant Included in Exhibit 2 above

4(d) Fourth Amended and Restated Incorporated herein by reference
Credit Agreement, dated as of to the Registrant's Quarterly
March 17, 1995, among the Report on Form 10-Q for the
Registrant, Chemical Bank, the fiscal quarter ended April 1,
lenders party thereto and 1995 (File No. 0-19768) [Exhibit
Chemical Bank, as agent (the 4(d)]
"Credit Agreement")

4(e) First Amendment and Consent, Pages 95 through 124
dated as of December 23, 1996,
to the Credit Agreement among
the Registrant, the lenders party
thereto and The Chase Manhattan
Bank (formerly Chemical Bank), as
agent

E-1
Exhibit No. Description                        Location
- ---------- ----------- --------

4(f) Subordinated Indenture, dated as Incorporated herein by reference
of June 1, 1994, among The Scotts to Scotts Delaware's Registration
Company, a Delaware Corporation Statement on Form S-3 filed with
("Scotts Delaware"), The O. M. the SEC on June 1, 1994
Scott & Sons Company ("OMS") and (Registration No. 33-53941)
Chemical Bank, as trustee [Exhibit 4(b)]

4(g) First Supplemental Indenture, Incorporated herein by reference
dated as of July 12, 1994, among to Scotts Delaware's Current
Scotts Delaware, OMS and Chemical Report on Form 8-K dated July 18,
Bank, as trustee 1994 (File No. 0-19768) [Exhibit
4.1]

4(h) Second Supplemental Indenture, Incorporated herein by reference
dated as of September 20, 1994, to the Registrant's Annual
among the Registrant, OMS, Scotts Report on Form 10-K for the
Delaware and Chemical Bank, as fiscal year ended September 30,
trustee 1994 (File No. 0-19768) [Exhibit
4(i)]

4(i) Third Supplemental Indenture, Incorporated herein by reference
dated as of September 30, 1994, to the Registrant's Annual Report
between the Registrant and on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
Chemical Bank, as trustee ended September 30, 1994 (File No.
0-19768) [Exhibit 4(j)]

10(a) The Scotts Company Associates' Pages 125 through 176
Pension Plan as amended
effective January 1, 1989 and
December 31, 1995

10(b) Third Restatement of The Scotts Pages 177 through 217
Company Profit Sharing and
Savings Plan

10(c) Employment Agreement, dated as Incorporated herein by reference
of October 21, 1991, between Report on Form 10-K for the
Scotts (as successor to The O.M. fiscal year ended September 30,
Scott & Sons Company ("OMS") 1993 of The Scotts Company, a
and Theodore J. Host to Annual Delaware corporation ("Scotts
Delaware") (File No. 0-19768)
[Exhibit 10(g)]

10(d) Stock Option Plan and Agreement, Incorporated herein by reference
dated as of January 9, 1992, to the Scott's Annual Report on
between Scotts (as successor to Form 10-K for the fiscal year
Scotts Delaware) and Theodore J. ended September 30, 1994 (File
Host No. 0-19768) [Exhibit 10(f)]

10(e) The O.M. Scott & Sons Company Incorporated herein by reference
Excess Benefit Plan, effective to Scotts Delaware's Annual
October 1, 1993 Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended September 30, 1988
(File No. 0-19768) [Exhibit 10(h)]

10(f) The Scotts Company 1992 Long Incorporated herein by reference
Term Incentive Plan to Scotts Delaware's Registration
Statement on Form S-8 filed with
the SEC on March 26, 1993
(Registration No. 33-60056)
[Exhibit 4(f)]

10(g) The Scotts Company 1996 Pages 218 through 220
Executive Annual Incentive
Plan

E-2
Exhibit No. Description                        Location
- ---------- ----------- --------

10(h) Employment Agreement, dated as Incorporated herein by reference
of May 19, 1995, between Scotts to Scotts' Annual Report on Form
and James Hagedorn 10-K for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 1995 (File No.
1-11593) [Exhibit 10(p)]

10(i) The Scotts Company 1996 Stock Pages 221 through 229
Option Plan (as amended through
December 16, 1996)

10(j) Employment Agreement, dated as Pages 230 through 243
of May 19, 1995, among Stern's
Miracle-Gro Products, Inc. (nka
Scotts' Miracle-Gro Products,
Inc.), Scotts and Horace Hagedorn

10(k) Employment Agreement, dated as Pages 244 through 257
May 19, 1995, among Stern's
Miracle-Gro Products, Inc. (nka
Scotts' Miracle-Gro Products,
Inc.), Scotts and John Kenlon

10(l) Employment Agreement, dated as Pages 258 through 268
of August 7, 1996, between Scotts
and Charles M. Berger

10(m) Stock Option Agreement, dated as Pages 269 through 276
of August 7, 1996, between Scotts
and Charles M. Berger

10(n) Stock Option Agreement, dated as Pages 277 through 283
of March 5, 1996, between Scotts
and Tadd C. Seitz

10(o) Letter Agreement, dated April Pages 284 through 293
10, 1996, between Theodore J.
Host and Scotts

10(p) Letter Agreement, dated January Pages 294 through 299
18, 1996, between Scotts and
Paul D. Yeager, and amendment
dated September 16, 1996

11(a) Computation of Net Income Per Page 300
Common Share

13 Registrant's Annual Report to Pages 26 through 87
Shareholders for this fiscal
year ended September 30, 1996
(not deemed filed except for
portions thereof which are
specifically incorporated by
reference into this Annual
Report on Form 10-K)

21 Subsidiaries of the Registrant Pages 301 and 302

23 Consent of Independent Page 303
Accountants

27 Financial Data Schedule Page 304


E-3