Companies:
10,651
total market cap:
โน12824.362 T
Sign In
๐บ๐ธ
EN
English
โน INR
$
USD
๐บ๐ธ
โฌ
EUR
๐ช๐บ
ยฃ
GBP
๐ฌ๐ง
$
CAD
๐จ๐ฆ
$
AUD
๐ฆ๐บ
$
NZD
๐ณ๐ฟ
$
HKD
๐ญ๐ฐ
$
SGD
๐ธ๐ฌ
Global ranking
Ranking by countries
America
๐บ๐ธ United States
๐จ๐ฆ Canada
๐ฒ๐ฝ Mexico
๐ง๐ท Brazil
๐จ๐ฑ Chile
Europe
๐ช๐บ European Union
๐ฉ๐ช Germany
๐ฌ๐ง United Kingdom
๐ซ๐ท France
๐ช๐ธ Spain
๐ณ๐ฑ Netherlands
๐ธ๐ช Sweden
๐ฎ๐น Italy
๐จ๐ญ Switzerland
๐ต๐ฑ Poland
๐ซ๐ฎ Finland
Asia
๐จ๐ณ China
๐ฏ๐ต Japan
๐ฐ๐ท South Korea
๐ญ๐ฐ Hong Kong
๐ธ๐ฌ Singapore
๐ฎ๐ฉ Indonesia
๐ฎ๐ณ India
๐ฒ๐พ Malaysia
๐น๐ผ Taiwan
๐น๐ญ Thailand
๐ป๐ณ Vietnam
Others
๐ฆ๐บ Australia
๐ณ๐ฟ New Zealand
๐ฎ๐ฑ Israel
๐ธ๐ฆ Saudi Arabia
๐น๐ท Turkey
๐ท๐บ Russia
๐ฟ๐ฆ South Africa
>> All Countries
Ranking by categories
๐ All assets by Market Cap
๐ Automakers
โ๏ธ Airlines
๐ซ Airports
โ๏ธ Aircraft manufacturers
๐ฆ Banks
๐จ Hotels
๐ Pharmaceuticals
๐ E-Commerce
โ๏ธ Healthcare
๐ฆ Courier services
๐ฐ Media/Press
๐ท Alcoholic beverages
๐ฅค Beverages
๐ Clothing
โ๏ธ Mining
๐ Railways
๐ฆ Insurance
๐ Real estate
โ Ports
๐ผ Professional services
๐ด Food
๐ Restaurant chains
โ๐ป Software
๐ Semiconductors
๐ฌ Tobacco
๐ณ Financial services
๐ข Oil&Gas
๐ Electricity
๐งช Chemicals
๐ฐ Investment
๐ก Telecommunication
๐๏ธ Retail
๐ฅ๏ธ Internet
๐ Construction
๐ฎ Video Game
๐ป Tech
๐ฆพ AI
>> All Categories
ETFs
๐ All ETFs
๐๏ธ Bond ETFs
๏ผ Dividend ETFs
โฟ Bitcoin ETFs
โข Ethereum ETFs
๐ช Crypto Currency ETFs
๐ฅ Gold ETFs & ETCs
๐ฅ Silver ETFs & ETCs
๐ข๏ธ Oil ETFs & ETCs
๐ฝ Commodities ETFs & ETNs
๐ Emerging Markets ETFs
๐ Small-Cap ETFs
๐ Low volatility ETFs
๐ Inverse/Bear ETFs
โฌ๏ธ Leveraged ETFs
๐ Global/World ETFs
๐บ๐ธ USA ETFs
๐บ๐ธ S&P 500 ETFs
๐บ๐ธ Dow Jones ETFs
๐ช๐บ Europe ETFs
๐จ๐ณ China ETFs
๐ฏ๐ต Japan ETFs
๐ฎ๐ณ India ETFs
๐ฌ๐ง UK ETFs
๐ฉ๐ช Germany ETFs
๐ซ๐ท France ETFs
โ๏ธ Mining ETFs
โ๏ธ Gold Mining ETFs
โ๏ธ Silver Mining ETFs
๐งฌ Biotech ETFs
๐ฉโ๐ป Tech ETFs
๐ Real Estate ETFs
โ๏ธ Healthcare ETFs
โก Energy ETFs
๐ Renewable Energy ETFs
๐ก๏ธ Insurance ETFs
๐ฐ Water ETFs
๐ด Food & Beverage ETFs
๐ฑ Socially Responsible ETFs
๐ฃ๏ธ Infrastructure ETFs
๐ก Innovation ETFs
๐ Semiconductors ETFs
๐ Aerospace & Defense ETFs
๐ Cybersecurity ETFs
๐ฆพ Artificial Intelligence ETFs
Watchlist
Account
T-Mobile US
TMUS
#75
Rank
โน20.339 T
Marketcap
๐บ๐ธ
United States
Country
โน18,073
Share price
4.19%
Change (1 day)
-10.06%
Change (1 year)
๐ก Telecommunication
Categories
Market cap
Revenue
Earnings
Price history
P/E ratio
P/S ratio
More
Price history
P/E ratio
P/S ratio
P/B ratio
Operating margin
EPS
Stock Splits
Dividends
Dividend yield
Shares outstanding
Fails to deliver
Cost to borrow
Total assets
Total liabilities
Total debt
Cash on Hand
Net Assets
Annual Reports (10-K)
T-Mobile US
Quarterly Reports (10-Q)
Financial Year FY2016 Q3
T-Mobile US - 10-Q quarterly report FY2016 Q3
Text size:
Small
Medium
Large
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2016
or
¨
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 1-33409
T-MOBILE US, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE
20-0836269
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
12920 SE 38th Street, Bellevue, Washington
98006-1350
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
(425) 378-4000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
x
No
¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
x
No
¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
x
Accelerated filer
¨
Non-accelerated filer
¨
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company
¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes
¨
No
x
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Class
Shares Outstanding as of October 20, 2016
Common Stock, $0.00001 par value per share
824,015,429
T-Mobile US, Inc.
Form 10-Q
For the Quarter Ended
September 30, 2016
Table of Contents
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.
Financial Statements
3
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
3
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
4
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
5
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
6
Item 2.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
28
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
44
Item 4.
Controls and Procedures
44
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.
Legal Proceedings
44
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
44
Item 2.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
44
Item 3.
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
44
Item 4.
Mine Safety Disclosures
44
Item 5.
Other Information
44
Item 6.
Exhibits
45
SIGNATURE
46
2
Table of Contents
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
T-Mobile US, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Unaudited)
(in millions, except share and per share amounts)
September 30,
2016
December 31,
2015
Assets
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents
$
5,352
$
4,582
Short-term investments
—
2,998
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $111 and $116
1,885
1,788
Equipment installment plan receivables, net
1,669
2,378
Accounts receivable from affiliates
46
36
Inventories
1,039
1,295
Asset purchase deposit
2,203
—
Other current assets
1,336
1,813
Total current assets
13,530
14,890
Property and equipment, net
20,574
20,000
Goodwill
1,683
1,683
Spectrum licenses
26,590
23,955
Other intangible assets, net
431
594
Equipment installment plan receivables due after one year, net
839
847
Other assets
625
444
Total assets
$
64,272
$
62,413
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Current liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
$
6,146
$
8,084
Payables to affiliates
313
135
Short-term debt
325
182
Deferred revenue
980
717
Other current liabilities
355
410
Total current liabilities
8,119
9,528
Long-term debt
21,825
20,461
Long-term debt to affiliates
5,600
5,600
Tower obligations
2,629
2,658
Deferred tax liabilities
4,648
4,061
Deferred rent expense
2,591
2,481
Other long-term liabilities
1,007
1,067
Total long-term liabilities
38,300
36,328
Commitments and contingencies (Note 7)
Stockholders' equity
5.50% Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock Series A, par value $0.00001 per share, 100,000,000 shares authorized; 20,000,000 and 20,000,000 shares issued and outstanding; $1,000 and $1,000 aggregate liquidation value
—
—
Common Stock, par value $0.00001 per share, 1,000,000,000 shares authorized; 825,422,350 and 819,773,724 shares issued, 824,010,863 and 818,391,219 shares outstanding
—
—
Additional paid-in capital
38,853
38,666
Treasury stock, at cost, 1,411,487 and 1,382,505 shares issued
(1
)
—
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
1
(1
)
Accumulated deficit
(21,000
)
(22,108
)
Total stockholders' equity
17,853
16,557
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity
$
64,272
$
62,413
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
T-Mobile US, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended September 30,
Nine Months Ended September 30,
(in millions, except share and per share amounts)
2016
2015
2016
2015
Revenues
Branded postpaid revenues
$
4,647
$
4,197
$
13,458
$
12,046
Branded prepaid revenues
2,182
1,894
6,326
5,597
Wholesale revenues
238
170
645
492
Roaming and other service revenues
66
41
170
130
Total service revenues
7,133
6,302
20,599
18,265
Equipment revenues
1,948
1,416
5,987
5,182
Other revenues
165
131
481
359
Total revenues
9,246
7,849
27,067
23,806
Operating expenses
Cost of services, exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below
1,436
1,378
4,286
4,170
Cost of equipment sales
2,539
1,985
7,532
7,325
Selling, general and administrative
2,898
2,624
8,419
7,434
Depreciation and amortization
1,568
1,157
4,695
3,319
Cost of MetroPCS business combination
15
193
110
355
Gains on disposal of spectrum licenses
(199
)
(1
)
(835
)
(24
)
Total operating expenses
8,257
7,336
24,207
22,579
Operating income
989
513
2,860
1,227
Other income (expense)
Interest expense
(376
)
(262
)
(1,083
)
(780
)
Interest expense to affiliates
(76
)
(121
)
(248
)
(277
)
Interest income
62
109
198
335
Other expense, net
(1
)
(1
)
(6
)
(8
)
Total other expense, net
(391
)
(275
)
(1,139
)
(730
)
Income before income taxes
598
238
1,721
497
Income tax expense
(232
)
(100
)
(651
)
(61
)
Net income
366
138
1,070
436
Dividends on preferred stock
(13
)
(13
)
(41
)
(41
)
Net income attributable to common stockholders
$
353
$
125
$
1,029
$
395
Net income
$
366
$
138
$
1,070
$
436
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
Unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities, net of tax effect of $1, $(1), $1 and $(2)
2
(2
)
2
(2
)
Other comprehensive income (loss)
2
(2
)
2
(2
)
Total comprehensive income
$
368
$
136
$
1,072
$
434
Earnings per share
Basic
$
0.43
$
0.15
$
1.25
$
0.49
Diluted
$
0.42
$
0.15
$
1.24
$
0.48
Weighted average shares outstanding
Basic
822,998,697
815,069,272
821,626,675
811,783,620
Diluted
832,257,819
822,017,220
831,241,027
820,514,748
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
T-Mobile US, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended September 30,
Nine Months Ended September 30,
(in millions)
2016
2015
2016
2015
Operating activities
Net income
$
366
$
138
$
1,070
$
436
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities
Depreciation and amortization
1,568
1,157
4,695
3,319
Stock-based compensation expense
59
42
171
153
Deferred income tax expense
219
134
623
82
Bad debt expense
118
172
358
384
Losses from sales of receivables
59
26
157
139
Deferred rent expense
32
43
97
131
Gains on disposal of spectrum licenses
(199
)
(1
)
(835
)
(24
)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
Accounts receivable
(155
)
(48
)
(462
)
(156
)
Equipment installment plan receivables
104
229
556
(350
)
Inventories
301
(915
)
(497
)
(973
)
Deferred purchase price from sales of receivables
(16
)
(34
)
(199
)
(46
)
Other current and long-term assets
(98
)
(184
)
31
(58
)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
(731
)
582
(1,568
)
36
Other current and long-term liabilities
112
92
326
2
Other, net
1
98
10
106
Net cash provided by operating activities
1,740
1,531
4,533
3,181
Investing activities
Purchases of property and equipment
(1,159
)
(1,120
)
(3,843
)
(3,293
)
Purchases of spectrum licenses and other intangible assets, including deposits
(705
)
(94
)
(3,544
)
(1,938
)
Sales of short-term investments
—
—
2,998
—
Other, net
5
5
3
(7
)
Net cash used in investing activities
(1,859
)
(1,209
)
(4,386
)
(5,238
)
Financing activities
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
—
—
997
—
Repayments of capital lease obligations
(54
)
(13
)
(133
)
(24
)
Repayments of short-term debt for purchases of inventory, property and equipment, net
—
(315
)
(150
)
(563
)
Repayments of long-term debt
(5
)
—
(15
)
—
Tax withholdings on share-based awards
(3
)
(2
)
(52
)
(100
)
Dividends on preferred stock
(13
)
(13
)
(41
)
(41
)
Other, net
8
12
17
103
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
(67
)
(331
)
623
(625
)
Change in cash and cash equivalents
(186
)
(9
)
770
(2,682
)
Cash and cash equivalents
Beginning of period
5,538
2,642
4,582
5,315
End of period
$
5,352
$
2,633
$
5,352
$
2,633
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information
Interest payments, net of amounts capitalized
$
478
$
348
$
1,292
$
969
Income tax payments
4
8
23
41
Changes in accounts payable for purchases of property and equipment
(79
)
267
(307
)
94
Leased devices transferred from inventory to property and equipment
234
854
1,175
854
Returned leased devices transferred from property and equipment to inventory
(186
)
(32
)
(422
)
(32
)
Issuance of short-term debt for financing of property and equipment
—
—
150
500
Assets acquired under capital lease obligations
384
119
679
309
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
T-Mobile US, Inc.
Index for Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1
Basis of Presentation
7
Note 2
Significant Transactions
9
Note 3
Sales of Certain Receivables
10
Note 4
Equipment Installment Plan Receivables
13
Note 5
Fair Value Measurements
14
Note 6
Earnings Per Share
15
Note 7
Commitments and Contingencies
16
Note 8
Income Taxes
17
Note 9
Guarantor Financial Information
17
6
Table of Contents
T-Mobile US, Inc.
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 – Basis of Presentation
The unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements
of T-Mobile US, Inc. (“T-Mobile,” “we,” “our,” “us” or the “Company”) include all adjustments of a normal recurring nature necessary for the fair presentation of the results for the interim periods presented. The results for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of those for the full year. The
condensed consolidated financial statements
should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2015
.
The
condensed consolidated financial statements
include the balances and results of operations of T-Mobile and our consolidated subsidiaries. We consolidate majority-owned subsidiaries over which we exercise control, as well as variable interest entities (“VIE”) where we are deemed to be the primary beneficiary and VIEs, which cannot be deconsolidated, such as those related to Tower obligations. Intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
Certain prior period amounts relating to the adoption of Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2015-03 “Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs,” have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation. See “Accounting Pronouncements Adopted During the Current Year” below.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with United States (“U.S.”) generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) requires our management to make estimates and assumptions which affect the financial statements and accompanying notes. Estimates are based on historical experience, where applicable, and other assumptions which our management believes are reasonable under the circumstances. These estimates are inherently subject to judgment and actual results could differ from those estimates.
Revenue Recognition
We offer products and services to customers through bundled arrangements, which may be comprised of multiple contracts entered into with a customer at or near the same time. We assess such agreements as a single bundled arrangement that may involve multiple deliverables, which include wireless devices, wireless services or a combination thereof. For multiple deliverable arrangements revenue is allocated between the separate units of accounting based on such components’ relative selling prices on a standalone basis.
In June 2016, we introduced #GetThanked, which offers eligible customers the following free promotional items as part of their T-Mobile service:
•
T-Mobile stock - A share of T-Mobile stock to eligible new (through December 31, 2016) or existing (as of June 6, 2016) customers. Shares issued to customers under this promotion are purchased by an independent third-party broker in the open market on behalf of eligible customers. The associated cost, which is paid by T-Mobile, is recorded as a reduction of service revenue for existing customers and as a reduction of equipment revenue for new customers in our
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
. Through December 31, 2016, existing eligible customers can also receive a share of T-Mobile stock (subject to a maximum of
100
shares in a calendar year) for every new active account they refer, purchased by the third-party broker and paid for by T-Mobile. The cost of shares issued under this refer-a-friend program are included in
Selling, general and administrative
expense in our
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
;
•
Weekly surprise items - Each Tuesday, eligible customers who download the T-Mobile Tuesday app are informed about and can redeem products and services offered by participating business partners. The associated cost is included in
Selling, general and administrative
expense in our
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
; and
•
In-flight Wi-Fi - A full hour of in-flight Wi-Fi free to eligible customers on their smartphone on all Gogo-equipped domestic flights. The associated cost, which is paid by T-Mobile, is included in Cost of services in our
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
.
7
Table of Contents
Accounting Pronouncements Adopted During the Current Year
In April 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued ASU 2015-03, “Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs.” The standard requires debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected. We adopted this new guidance in the first quarter of 2016 and applied the changes retrospectively. The implementation of this standard did not have a significant impact on our
condensed consolidated financial statements
.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, “Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting,” which simplifies several aspects of the accounting for shared-based payment transactions, including income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. We elected to adopt this standard as of January 1, 2016, as permitted. The impacts on our
condensed consolidated financial statements
from the adoption of this standard are as follows:
•
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
- A
$38 million
decrease to the January 1, 2016
Accumulated deficit
balance from the recognition, on a modified retrospective basis, of all previously unrecognized income tax attributes related to share-based payments;
•
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
- On a prospective basis, all excess tax benefits and deficiencies related to share-based payments will be recognized through
Income tax expense
. Prior period amounts were not adjusted; and
•
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
- On a prospective basis, as permitted, excess tax benefits related to share-based payments will be presented as operating activities. Prior period amounts were not adjusted.
Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (“ASU 2014-09”), and has since modified the standard with ASU 2015-14, “Revenue From Contracts With Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date,” ASU 2016-08, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net),” ASU 2016-10, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing” and ASU 2016-12, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients.” The standard requires entities to recognize revenue through the application of a five-step model, which includes identification of the contract, identification of the performance obligations, determination of the transaction price, allocation of the transaction price to the performance obligations and recognition of revenue as the entity satisfies the performance obligations. We plan to adopt the standard when it becomes effective beginning January 1, 2018; however, early adoption with the original effective date for periods beginning January 1, 2017 is permitted. Under ASU 2014-09, two adoption methods are allowed. Under one method, a company may apply the rules to contracts in all reporting periods presented, subject to certain allowable exceptions. Under the other method, a company may apply the rules to all contracts existing as of January 1, 2018 (provided early adoption is not elected), recognizing an adjustment to retained earnings for the cumulative effect of the change and providing additional disclosures comparing results to previous rules. We continue to evaluate the impact of the new standard and available adoption methods on our consolidated financial statements and believe the standard will result in the implementation of new revenue accounting systems, processes and internal controls over revenue recognition.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases.” The standard requires all lessees to report a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for most leases. The income statement recognition is similar to existing lease accounting and is based on lease classification. The standard requires lessees and lessors to classify most leases using principles similar to existing lease accounting, but eliminates the “bright line” classification tests. For lessors, the standard modifies the classification criteria and the accounting for sales-type and direct financing leases. The standard will become effective for us beginning January 1, 2019 and will require recognizing and measuring leases at the beginning of the earliest period presented using a modified retrospective approach. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the standard and the timing of adoption but expect that it will have a material impact on our
consolidated financial statements
.
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, “Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments.” The standard requires a financial asset (or a group of financial assets) measured at amortized cost basis to be presented at the net amount expected to be collected. The measurement of expected credit losses is based on relevant information about past events, including historical experience, current conditions and reasonable and supportable
8
Table of Contents
forecasts that affect the collectibility of the reported amount. The standard will become effective for us beginning January 1, 2020 and will require a cumulative-effect adjustment to
Accumulated deficit
as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is effective (that is, a modified-retrospective approach). Early adoption is permitted for us as of January 1, 2019. We are currently evaluating the impact this guidance will have on our
consolidated financial statements
and the timing of adoption.
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments.” The standard provides guidance on how certain cash receipts and payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows, including beneficial interests in securitization, which would impact the presentation of the deferred purchase price from sales of receivables. The standard is intended to reduce current diversity in practice. The standard will become effective for us beginning January 1, 2018 and will require a retrospective approach. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. We are currently evaluating the impact this guidance will have on our
consolidated financial statements
and the timing of adoption.
Note 2 – Significant Transactions
Spectrum License Transactions
The following table summarizes our spectrum license activity:
(in millions)
Spectrum Licenses
Balance at December 31, 2015
$
23,955
Spectrum license acquisitions
2,914
Spectrum licenses transferred to held for sale
(323
)
Costs to clear spectrum
44
Balance at September 30, 2016
$
26,590
We had the following spectrum license transactions during the
nine months ended
September 30, 2016
:
•
We closed on the agreement with AT&T Inc. for the acquisition and exchange of certain spectrum licenses. Upon closing of the transaction during the first quarter of
2016
, we recorded the spectrum licenses received at their estimated fair value of approximately
$1.2 billion
and recognized a gain of
$636 million
included in
Gains on disposal of spectrum licenses
in our
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
.
•
We closed on agreements with multiple third parties for the purchase and exchange of certain spectrum licenses for
$1.3 billion
in cash. Upon closing of the transactions during the
nine months ended
September 30, 2016
, we recorded spectrum licenses received at their estimated fair values totaling approximately
$1.7 billion
and recognized gains of
$199 million
included in
Gains on disposal of spectrum licenses
in our
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
.
•
We entered into an agreement with a third party for the exchange of certain spectrum licenses, which is expected to close in the first quarter of 2017. Our spectrum licenses to be transferred as part of the exchange transaction were reclassified as assets held for sale and were included in
Other current assets
in our
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
at their carrying value of
$86 million
as of
September 30, 2016
.
•
We entered into an agreement with a third party for the purchase of certain spectrum licenses covering approximately
11 million
people for approximately
$420 million
. The transaction is expected to close in the fourth quarter of 2016, subject to regulatory approval and other customary closing conditions.
Debt
In March
2016
, T-Mobile USA, Inc. (“T-Mobile USA”), a subsidiary of T-Mobile US, Inc., and certain of its affiliates, as guarantors, entered into a purchase agreement with Deutsche Telekom AG (“Deutsche Telekom”), our majority stockholder, under which T-Mobile USA may, at its option, issue and sell to Deutsche Telekom
$2.0 billion
of
5.300%
Senior Notes due 2021 (the “
5.300%
Senior Notes”) for an aggregate purchase price of
$2.0 billion
. If T-Mobile USA does not elect to issue the
5.300%
Senior Notes on or prior to November 30, 2016, the commitment under the purchase agreement terminates and T-Mobile USA must reimburse Deutsche Telekom for the cost of its hedging arrangements (if any) related to the transaction. As
9
Table of Contents
of
September 30, 2016
, if the commitment under this purchase agreement was terminated, the reimbursement amount due to Deutsche Telekom would not be significant.
In April
2016
, T-Mobile USA and certain of its affiliates, as guarantors, (i) issued
$1.0 billion
of public
6.000%
Senior Notes due 2024, (ii) entered into a purchase agreement with Deutsche Telekom, under which T-Mobile USA may, at its option, issue and sell to Deutsche Telekom up to
$1.35 billion
of
6.000%
Senior Notes due 2024 and (iii) entered into another purchase agreement with Deutsche Telekom, under which T-Mobile USA may, at its option, issue and sell up to an additional
$650 million
of
6.000%
Senior Notes due 2024.
The purchase price for the
6.000%
Senior Notes that may be issued under the
$1.35 billion
purchase agreement will be approximately
103.316%
of the outstanding principal balance of the notes issued. If T-Mobile USA does not elect to issue the
6.000%
Senior Notes under the
$1.35 billion
purchase agreement on or prior to November 5, 2016 or elects to issue less than
$1.35 billion
of
6.000%
Senior Notes, any unused portion of the commitment under the purchase agreement terminates and T-Mobile USA must reimburse Deutsche Telekom for the cost of its hedging arrangements (if any) related to the transaction. As of
September 30, 2016
, if the commitment under this purchase agreement was terminated, the reimbursement amount due to Deutsche Telekom would not be significant.
The purchase price for the
6.000%
Senior Notes that may be issued under the
$650 million
purchase agreement will be approximately
104.047%
of the outstanding principal balance of the notes issued. If T-Mobile USA does not elect to issue the
6.000%
Senior Notes under the
$650 million
purchase agreement on or prior to November 5, 2016 or elects to issue less than
$650 million
of
6.000%
Senior Notes, any unused portion of the commitment under the purchase agreement terminates and T-Mobile USA must reimburse Deutsche Telekom for the cost of its hedging arrangements (if any) related to the transaction. As of
September 30, 2016
, if the commitment under this purchase agreement was terminated, the reimbursement amount due to Deutsche Telekom would not be significant.
In addition to the new debt issued, and purchase commitments with Deutsche Telekom, the supplemental indentures governing the Senior Reset Notes to affiliates provided for the adjustment of the interest rates on such Notes at various reset dates to rates determined in accordance with the applicable supplemental indenture. In April
2016
, the interest rate on the
$600 million
of Senior Reset Notes to affiliates due 2023 was adjusted from
5.950%
to
9.332%
.
Other
In June 2016, a refundable deposit of
$2.2 billion
was made to a third party in connection with a potential asset purchase. The deposit is included in
Asset purchase deposit
in our
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
.
During the quarter ended and subsequent to September 30, 2016, a handset Original Equipment Manufacturer (“OEM”) announced recalls on certain of its smartphone devices. As a result, we recorded no revenue associated with the device sales to customers and impaired the devices to their net realizable value. The OEM has agreed to reimburse T-Mobile, as such, we have recorded an amount due from the OEM as an offset to the loss recorded in Cost of equipment sales in our
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
and a reduction to
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
in our
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
.
Note 3 – Sales of Certain Receivables
We have entered into transactions to sell certain service and Equipment Installment Plan (“EIP”) accounts receivables. The transactions, including our continuing involvement with the sold receivables and the respective impacts to our financial statements, are described below.
Sales of Service Receivables
Overview of the Transaction
In 2014, we entered into an arrangement to sell certain service accounts receivables on a revolving basis with a current maximum funding commitment of
$750 million
and scheduled expiration date in
March 2017
(the “service receivable sale arrangement”). The service receivable sale arrangement provided funding of
$750 million
as of
September 30, 2016
and
December 31, 2015
. Sales of receivables occur daily and are settled on a monthly basis. The receivables consist of service charges currently due from customers and are short-term in nature.
10
Table of Contents
In connection with the service receivable sale arrangement, we formed a wholly-owned subsidiary, which qualifies as a bankruptcy remote entity to sell service accounts receivables (“Service BRE”). Service BRE does not qualify as a Variable Interest Entity (“VIE”), and due to the significant level of control we exercise over the entity, it is consolidated. Pursuant to the arrangement, certain of our wholly-owned subsidiaries transfer selected receivables to Service BRE. Service BRE then sells the receivables to an unaffiliated entity (“Service VIE”), which was established to facilitate the sale of beneficial ownership interests in the receivables to certain third parties.
Variable Interest Entity
We determined that Service VIE qualifies as a VIE as it lacks sufficient equity to finance its activities. We have a variable interest in Service VIE, but are not the primary beneficiary as we lack the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact Service VIE’s economic performance. Those activities include committing Service VIE to legal agreements to purchase or sell assets, selecting which receivables are purchased in the service receivable sale arrangement, determining whether Service VIE will sell interests in the purchased service receivables to other parties, funding of the entities and servicing of receivables. We do not hold the power to direct the key decisions underlying these activities. For example, while we act as the servicer of the sold receivables, which is considered a significant activity of the VIE, we are acting as an agent in our capacity as the servicer and the counterparty to the service receivable sale arrangement has the ability to remove us as the servicing agent of the receivables at will with no recourse available to us. As we have determined we are not the primary beneficiary, the results of Service VIE are not consolidated into our
condensed consolidated financial statements
.
The following table summarizes the carrying amounts and classification of assets (primarily the deferred purchase price) and liabilities included in our
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
that relate to our variable interest in Service VIE:
(in millions)
September 30,
2016
December 31,
2015
Other current assets
$
167
$
206
Other current liabilities
57
73
Sales of EIP Receivables
Overview of the Transaction
In 2015, we entered into an arrangement to sell certain EIP accounts receivables on a revolving basis with a maximum funding commitment of
$800 million
(the “EIP sale arrangement”). In June 2016, the EIP sale arrangement was amended to increase the maximum funding commitment to
$1.3 billion
with a scheduled expiration date in
November 2017
. As of
September 30, 2016
and
December 31, 2015
, the EIP sale arrangement provided funding of
$1.2 billion
and
$800 million
, respectively. Sales of EIP receivables occur daily and are settled on a monthly basis. The receivables consist of customer EIP balances, which require monthly customer payments for up to 24 months.
In connection with this EIP sale arrangement, we formed a wholly-owned subsidiary, which qualifies as a bankruptcy remote entity (“EIP BRE”). Pursuant to the EIP sale arrangement, our wholly-owned subsidiary transfers selected receivables to EIP BRE. EIP BRE then sells the receivables to a non-consolidated and unaffiliated third-party entity for which we do not exercise any level of control, nor does the entity qualify as a VIE.
Variable Interest Entity
We determined that EIP BRE is a VIE as its equity investment at risk lacks the obligation to absorb a certain portion of its expected losses. We have a variable interest in EIP BRE and determined that we are the primary beneficiary based on our ability to direct the activities which most significantly impact EIP BRE’s economic performance. Those activities include selecting which receivables are transferred into EIP BRE and sold in the EIP sale arrangement and funding of EIP BRE. Additionally, our equity interest in EIP BRE obligates us to absorb losses and gives us the right to receive benefits from the EIP BRE that could potentially be significant to EIP BRE. Accordingly, we determined that we are the primary beneficiary, and include the balances and results of operations of EIP BRE in our
condensed consolidated financial statements
.
11
Table of Contents
The following table summarizes the carrying amounts and classification of assets (primarily the deferred purchase price) and liabilities included in our
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
that relate to our EIP BRE:
(in millions)
September 30,
2016
December 31,
2015
Other current assets
$
350
$
164
Other assets
73
44
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
—
14
Other long-term liabilities
5
3
In addition, EIP BRE is a separate legal entity with its own separate creditors who will be entitled, prior to any liquidation of EIP BRE, to be satisfied prior to any value in EIP BRE becoming available to us. Accordingly, the assets of EIP BRE may not be used to settle our general obligations and creditors of EIP BRE have limited recourse to our general credit.
Sales of Receivables
The transfers of service receivables and EIP receivables to the non-consolidated entities are accounted for as sales of financial assets. Once identified for sale, the receivable is recorded at the lower of cost or fair value. Upon sale, we derecognize the net carrying amount of the receivables. We recognize the net cash proceeds in Net cash provided by operating activities in our
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
.
The proceeds are net of the deferred purchase price, consisting of a receivable from the purchasers that entitles us to certain collections on the receivables. We recognize the collection of the deferred purchase price in Net cash provided by operating activities as it is dependent on collection of the customer receivables and is not subject to significant interest rate risk. The deferred purchase price represents a financial asset that is primarily tied to the creditworthiness of the customers and which can be settled in such a way that we may not recover substantially all of our recorded investment, due to default by the customers on the underlying receivables. We elected, at inception, to measure the deferred purchase price at fair value with changes in fair value included in
Selling, general and administrative
expense in our
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
. The fair value of the deferred purchase price is determined based on a discounted cash flow model which uses primarily unobservable inputs (Level 3 inputs), including customer default rates. As of
September 30, 2016
and
December 31, 2015
, our deferred purchase price related to the sales of service receivables and EIP receivables was
$588 million
and
$389 million
, respectively.
The following table summarizes the impacts of the sale of certain service receivables and EIP receivables in our
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
:
(in millions)
September 30,
2016
December 31,
2015
Derecognized net service receivables and EIP receivables
$
2,379
$
1,850
Other current assets
517
370
of which, deferred purchase price
515
345
Other long-term assets
73
44
of which, deferred purchase price
73
44
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
—
14
Other current liabilities
57
73
Other long-term liabilities
5
3
Net cash proceeds since inception
1,863
1,494
Of which:
Net cash proceeds during the year-to-date period
369
884
Net cash proceeds funded by reinvested collections
1,494
610
We recognized losses from sales of receivables of
$59 million
and
$26 million
for the
three months ended
September 30, 2016
and
2015
, respectively, and
$157 million
and
$139 million
for the
nine months ended
September 30, 2016
and
2015
, respectively. These losses from sales of receivables were recognized in
Selling, general and administrative
expense in our
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
. Losses from sales of receivables include adjustments to the receivables’ fair values and changes in fair value of the deferred purchase price.
12
Table of Contents
Continuing Involvement
Pursuant to the sale arrangements described above, we have continuing involvement with the service receivables and EIP receivables we sell as we service the receivables and are required to repurchase certain receivables, including ineligible receivables, aged receivables and receivables where write-off is imminent. We continue to service the customers and their related receivables, including facilitating customer payment collection, in exchange for a monthly servicing fee. As the receivables are sold on a revolving basis, the customer payment collections on sold receivables may be reinvested in new receivable sales. While servicing the receivables, we apply the same policies and procedures to the sold receivables as we apply to our owned receivables, and we continue to maintain normal relationships with our customers. Pursuant to the EIP sale arrangement, under certain circumstances, we are required to deposit cash or replacement EIP receivables for contracts terminated by customers under our JUMP! Program.
In addition, we have continuing involvement with the sold receivables as we may be responsible for absorbing additional credit losses pursuant to the sale arrangements. Our maximum exposure to loss related to the involvement with the service receivables and EIP receivables sold under the sale arrangements was
$1.1 billion
as of
September 30, 2016
. The maximum exposure to loss, which is a required disclosure under GAAP, represents an estimated loss that would be incurred under severe, hypothetical circumstances whereby we would not receive the deferred purchase price portion of the contractual proceeds withheld by the purchasers and would also be required to repurchase the maximum amount of receivables pursuant to the sale arrangements without consideration for any recovery. As we believe the probability of these circumstances occurring is remote, the maximum exposure to loss is not an indication of our expected loss.
Note 4 – Equipment Installment Plan Receivables
We offer certain retail customers the option to pay for their devices and other purchases in installments over a period of up to
24
months using an EIP.
The following table summarizes the EIP receivables:
(in millions)
September 30,
2016
December 31,
2015
EIP receivables, gross
$
2,795
$
3,558
Unamortized imputed discount
(154
)
(185
)
EIP receivables, net of unamortized imputed discount
2,641
3,373
Allowance for credit losses
(133
)
(148
)
EIP receivables, net
$
2,508
$
3,225
Classified on the balance sheet as:
Equipment installment plan receivables, net
$
1,669
$
2,378
Equipment installment plan receivables due after one year, net
839
847
EIP receivables, net
$
2,508
$
3,225
We use a proprietary credit scoring model that measures the credit quality of a customer at the time of application for mobile communications service using several factors, such as credit bureau information, consumer credit risk scores and service plan characteristics. Based upon customer credit profiles, we classify EIP receivables into the credit categories of “Prime” and “Subprime.” Prime customer receivables are those with lower delinquency risk and Subprime customer receivables are those with higher delinquency risk. Subprime customers may be required to make a down payment on their equipment purchases. In addition, certain customers within the Subprime category are required to pay an advance deposit.
EIP receivables for which invoices have not yet been generated for the customer are classified as Unbilled. EIP receivables for which invoices have been generated but which are not past the contractual due date are classified as Billed – Current. EIP receivables for which invoices have been generated and the payment is past the contractual due date are classified as Billed – Past Due.
13
Table of Contents
The balance and aging of the EIP receivables on a gross basis by credit category were as follows:
September 30, 2016
December 31, 2015
(in millions)
Prime
Subprime
Total
Prime
Subprime
Total
Unbilled
$
1,084
$
1,501
$
2,585
$
1,593
$
1,698
$
3,291
Billed – Current
54
80
134
77
91
168
Billed – Past Due
26
50
76
37
62
99
EIP receivables, gross
$
1,164
$
1,631
$
2,795
$
1,707
$
1,851
$
3,558
The increase in subprime EIP receivables as a percentage of total EIP receivables is primarily due to the EIP sale arrangement funding increase during the
nine months ended
September 30, 2016
.
Activity for the
nine months ended
September 30, 2016
and
2015
in the unamortized imputed discount and allowance for credit losses balances for the EIP receivables was as follows:
(in millions)
September 30,
2016
September 30,
2015
Imputed discount and allowance for credit losses, beginning of period
$
333
$
448
Bad debt expense
185
269
Write-offs, net of recoveries
(201
)
(248
)
Change in imputed discount on short-term and long-term EIP receivables
103
(47
)
Impacts from sales of EIP receivables
(133
)
—
Imputed discount and allowance for credit losses, end of period
$
287
$
422
The EIP receivables had weighted average effective imputed interest rates of
9.2%
and
8.8%
as of
September 30, 2016
and
December 31, 2015
, respectively.
Note 5 – Fair Value Measurements
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The carrying amounts and fair values of our short-term investments and long-term debt included in our
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
were as follows:
September 30, 2016
December 31, 2015
(in millions)
Carrying Amount
Fair Value
Carrying Amount
Fair Value
Assets:
Short-term investments
$
—
$
—
$
2,998
$
2,998
Liabilities:
Senior Notes to third parties
$
18,600
$
19,805
$
17,600
$
18,098
Senior Reset Notes to affiliates
5,600
5,930
5,600
6,072
Senior Secured Term Loans
1,985
2,014
2,000
1,990
Short-term Investments
The fair value of our short-term investments as of
December 31, 2015
, which consisted of U.S. Treasury securities, was determined based on quoted market prices in active markets, and therefore was classified as Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy. We did not have any short-term investments as of
September 30, 2016
.
Long-term Debt
The fair value of our Senior Notes to third parties was determined based on quoted market prices in active markets, and therefore was classified as Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy. The fair value of the Senior Secured Term Loans and Senior Reset Notes to affiliates was determined based on a discounted cash flow approach using quoted prices of instruments with similar terms and maturities and an estimate for the stand-alone credit risk of T-Mobile. Accordingly, our Senior Secured Term Loans and Senior Reset Notes to affiliates were classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.
14
Table of Contents
Although we have determined the estimated fair values using available market information and commonly accepted valuation methodologies, considerable judgment was required in interpreting market data to develop fair value estimates for the Senior Secured Term Loans and Senior Reset Notes to affiliates. The fair value estimates were based on information available as of
September 30, 2016
and
December 31, 2015
. As such, our estimates are not necessarily indicative of the amount we could realize in a current market exchange.
Deferred Purchase Price Assets
In connection with the sales of certain service and EIP receivables pursuant to the sale arrangements, we have deferred purchase price assets measured at fair value that are based on a discounted cash flow model using unobservable Level 3 inputs, including customer default rates. There were no significant changes in fair value for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2016
. See
Note 3 – Sales of Certain Receivables
for further information.
Guarantee Liabilities
We offer a device trade-in program, Just Upgrade My Phone (“JUMP!”), which provides eligible customers a specified-price trade-in right to upgrade their device. For customers who enroll in the device trade-in program, we defer the portion of equipment revenues which represents the estimated fair value of the specified-price trade-in right guarantee incorporating the expected probability and timing of the handset upgrade and the estimated fair value of the used handset which is returned. Accordingly, our guarantee liabilities were classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. When customers upgrade their device, the difference between the trade-in credit to the customer and the fair value of the returned device is recorded against the guarantee liabilities. Guarantee liabilities were
$140 million
and
$163 million
as of
September 30, 2016
and
December 31, 2015
, respectively, and are included in
Other current liabilities
in our
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
.
The total estimated remaining gross EIP receivable balances of all enrolled handset upgrade program customers, which are the remaining EIP amounts underlying the JUMP! guarantee, including EIP receivables that have been sold, was
$2.0 billion
as of
September 30, 2016
. This is not an indication of our expected loss exposure as it does not consider the expected fair value of the used handset or the probability and timing of the trade-in.
Note 6 – Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share amounts are computed by dividing net income, after the deduction of preferred stock dividends declared by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share amounts assume the issuance of common stock for potentially dilutive share equivalents outstanding.
The computation of basic and diluted earnings per share was as follows:
Three Months Ended September 30,
Nine Months Ended September 30,
(in millions, except shares and per share amounts)
2016
2015
2016
2015
Net income
$
366
$
138
$
1,070
$
436
Less: Dividends on mandatory convertible preferred stock
(13
)
(13
)
(41
)
(41
)
Net income attributable to common stockholders - basic and diluted
$
353
$
125
$
1,029
$
395
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic
822,998,697
815,069,272
821,626,675
811,783,620
Effect of dilutive securities:
Outstanding stock options and unvested stock awards
9,259,122
6,947,948
9,614,352
8,731,128
Weighted average shares outstanding - diluted
832,257,819
822,017,220
831,241,027
820,514,748
Earnings per share - basic
$
0.43
$
0.15
$
1.25
$
0.49
Earnings per share - diluted
$
0.42
$
0.15
$
1.24
$
0.48
Potentially dilutive securities:
Outstanding stock options and unvested stock awards
278,675
576,408
287,375
1,289,514
Mandatory convertible preferred stock
32,237,266
32,237,266
32,237,266
32,237,266
Potentially dilutive securities were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share if to do so would have been anti-dilutive.
15
Table of Contents
Note 7 – Commitments and Contingencies
Commitments
Operating Leases and Purchase Commitments
Future minimum payments for non-cancelable operating leases and purchase commitments are summarized below:
(in millions)
Operating Leases
Purchase Commitments
Year Ending September 30,
2017
$
2,429
$
3,360
2018
2,246
957
2019
2,064
857
2020
1,898
719
2021
1,579
627
Thereafter
5,345
1,116
Total
$
15,561
$
7,636
In May
2016
, we entered into a purchase agreement with a third party for the acquisition of certain spectrum licenses for
$420 million
. See
Note 2 – Significant Transactions
for further information.
Related-Party Commitments
In March
2016
, T-Mobile USA entered into a purchase agreement with Deutsche Telekom under which T-Mobile USA may, at its option, issue and sell to Deutsche Telekom
$2.0 billion
of
5.300%
Senior Notes due 2021 for an aggregate purchase price of
$2.0 billion
.
In April
2016
, T-Mobile USA entered into a purchase agreement with Deutsche Telekom under which T-Mobile USA may, at its option, issue and sell to Deutsche Telekom up to
$1.35 billion
of
6.000%
Senior Notes due 2024. The purchase price for the
6.000%
Senior Notes to be issued under this purchase agreement will be approximately
103.316%
of the outstanding principal balance of the notes issued.
In April
2016
, T-Mobile USA entered into a purchase agreement with Deutsche Telekom under which T-Mobile USA may, at its option, issue and sell to Deutsche Telekom up to
$650 million
of
6.000%
Senior Notes due 2024. The purchase price for the
6.000%
Senior Notes will be approximately
104.047%
of the outstanding principal balance of the notes issued.
See
Note 2 – Significant Transactions
-
Debt
for further information.
Contingencies and Litigation
T-Mobile is involved in various lawsuits, claims, government agency investigations and enforcement actions, and other proceedings (“Litigation Matters”) that arise in the ordinary course of business, which include numerous court actions alleging that T-Mobile is infringing various patents. Virtually all of the patent infringement cases are brought by non-practicing entities and effectively seek only monetary damages, although they occasionally seek injunctive relief as well. The Litigation Matters described above have progressed to various stages and some of them may proceed to trial, arbitration, hearing or other adjudication that could include an award of monetary or injunctive relief in the coming 12 months, if they are not otherwise resolved. T-Mobile has established an accrual with respect to certain of these matters, where appropriate, which is reflected in the
condensed consolidated financial statements
but that T-Mobile does not consider, individually or in the aggregate, material. An accrual is established when T-Mobile believes it is both probable that a loss has been incurred and an amount can be reasonably estimated. For other matters, where the Company has not determined that a loss is probable or because the amount of loss cannot be reasonably estimated, the Company has not recorded an accrual due to various factors typical in contested proceedings, including but not limited to: uncertainty concerning legal theories and their resolution by courts or regulators; uncertain damage theories and demands; and a less than fully developed factual record. While T-Mobile does not expect that the ultimate resolution of these proceedings, individually or in the aggregate will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, an unfavorable outcome of some or all of these proceedings could have a material adverse impact on results of operations or cash flows for a particular period. This assessment is based on T-Mobile’s current
16
Table of Contents
understanding of relevant facts and circumstances. As such, T-Mobile’s view of these matters is subject to inherent uncertainties and may change in the future.
On April 4, 2012, T-Mobile was sued in a patent infringement case by Prism Technologies LLC (“Prism”) in federal court in Nebraska. After a jury trial resulted in a defense verdict, the court entered judgment in favor of T-Mobile. Both parties have appealed. Absent a significant adverse change in the status of the case, the Company does not expect that the ultimate resolution of this case will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Note 8 – Income Taxes
Income tax expense was
$232 million
and
$100 million
for the
three months ended
September 30, 2016
and
2015
, respectively, and
$651 million
and
$61 million
for the
nine months ended September 30, 2016
and
2015
, respectively. The effective tax rate was
38.8%
and
42.0%
for the
three months ended
September 30, 2016
and
2015
, respectively, and
37.8%
and
12.3%
for the
nine months ended September 30, 2016
and
2015
, respectively. The lower effective income tax rate for the
three months ended
September 30, 2016
compared to the same period in
2015
resulted primarily from the increase in income before income taxes and the resulting decrease in the impact of unfavorable tax items. The higher effective income tax rate for the
nine months ended September 30, 2016
compared to the same period in
2015
resulted from income tax benefits for discrete income tax items recognized in
2015
that did not impact
2016
, including certain changes in state and local income tax laws and the recognition of certain federal tax credits. The increase in the effective income tax rate for the
nine months ended September 30, 2016
was partially offset by the recognition of
$24 million
of excess tax benefits related to share-based payments in
Income tax expense
resulting from the adoption of ASU 2016-09 as of January 1, 2016. See
Note 1 – Basis of Presentation
for further information.
Note 9 – Guarantor Financial Information
Pursuant to the applicable indentures and supplemental indentures, the long-term debt to affiliates and third parties, excluding Senior Secured Term Loans and capital leases, issued by T-Mobile USA (“Issuer”) is fully and unconditionally guaranteed, jointly and severally, on a senior unsecured basis by T-Mobile (“Parent”) and certain of the Issuer’s
100%
owned subsidiaries (“Guarantor Subsidiaries”).
In April
2016
, T-Mobile USA and certain of its affiliates, as guarantors, issued
$1.0 billion
of public
6.000%
Senior Notes due 2024.
The guarantees of the Guarantor Subsidiaries are subject to release in limited circumstances only upon the occurrence of certain customary conditions. The indentures governing the long-term debt contain covenants that, among other things, limit the ability of the Issuer and the Guarantor Subsidiaries to: incur more debt; pay dividends and make distributions; make certain investments; repurchase stock; create liens or other encumbrances; enter into transactions with affiliates; enter into transactions that restrict dividends or distributions from subsidiaries; and merge, consolidate, or sell, or otherwise dispose of, substantially all of their assets. Certain provisions of each of the indentures and the supplemental indentures relating to the long-term debt restrict the ability of the Issuer to loan funds or make payments to Parent. However, the Issuer and Guarantor Subsidiaries are allowed to make certain permitted payments to the Parent under the terms of the indentures and the supplemental indentures.
Presented below is the condensed consolidating financial information as of
September 30, 2016
and
December 31, 2015
and for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2016
and
2015
.
17
Table of Contents
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet Information
September 30, 2016
(in millions)
Parent
Issuer
Guarantor Subsidiaries
Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries
Consolidating and Eliminating Adjustments
Consolidated
Assets
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents
$
366
$
2,599
$
2,365
$
22
$
—
$
5,352
Accounts receivable, net
—
—
1,653
232
—
1,885
Equipment installment plan receivables, net
—
—
1,669
—
—
1,669
Accounts receivable from affiliates
—
6
40
—
—
46
Inventories
—
—
1,039
—
—
1,039
Asset purchase deposit
—
—
2,203
—
—
2,203
Other current assets
—
—
839
497
—
1,336
Total current assets
366
2,605
9,808
751
—
13,530
Property and equipment, net
(1)
—
—
20,179
395
—
20,574
Goodwill
—
—
1,683
—
—
1,683
Spectrum licenses
—
—
26,590
—
—
26,590
Other intangible assets, net
—
—
431
—
—
431
Investments in subsidiaries, net
17,293
34,387
—
—
(51,680
)
—
Intercompany receivables
194
7,282
—
—
(7,476
)
—
Equipment installment plan receivables due after one year, net
—
—
839
—
—
839
Other assets
—
6
562
246
(189
)
625
Total assets
$
17,853
$
44,280
$
60,092
$
1,392
$
(59,345
)
$
64,272
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Current liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
$
—
$
303
$
5,588
$
255
$
—
$
6,146
Payables to affiliates
—
178
135
—
—
313
Short-term debt
—
20
305
—
—
325
Deferred revenue
—
—
980
—
—
980
Other current liabilities
—
—
280
75
—
355
Total current liabilities
—
501
7,288
330
—
8,119
Long-term debt
—
20,755
1,070
—
—
21,825
Long-term debt to affiliates
—
5,600
—
—
—
5,600
Tower obligations
(1)
—
—
405
2,224
—
2,629
Deferred tax liabilities
—
—
4,837
—
(189
)
4,648
Deferred rent expense
—
—
2,591
—
—
2,591
Negative carrying value of subsidiaries, net
—
—
537
—
(537
)
—
Intercompany payables
—
—
7,286
190
(7,476
)
—
Other long-term liabilities
—
131
872
4
—
1,007
Total long-term liabilities
—
26,486
17,598
2,418
(8,202
)
38,300
Total stockholders' equity
17,853
17,293
35,206
(1,356
)
(51,143
)
17,853
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity
$
17,853
$
44,280
$
60,092
$
1,392
$
(59,345
)
$
64,272
(1)
Assets and liabilities for Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries are primarily included in VIEs related to the 2012 Tower Transaction. See Note 9 – Tower Obligations included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2015
.
18
Table of Contents
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet Information
December 31, 2015
(in millions)
Parent
Issuer
Guarantor Subsidiaries
Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries
Consolidating and Eliminating Adjustments
Consolidated
Assets
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents
$
378
$
1,767
$
2,364
$
73
$
—
$
4,582
Short-term investments
—
1,999
999
—
—
2,998
Accounts receivable, net
—
—
1,574
214
—
1,788
Equipment installment plan receivables, net
—
—
2,378
—
—
2,378
Accounts receivable from affiliates
—
—
36
—
—
36
Inventories
—
—
1,295
—
—
1,295
Other current assets
—
—
1,413
400
—
1,813
Total current assets
378
3,766
10,059
687
—
14,890
Property and equipment, net
(1)
—
—
19,546
454
—
20,000
Goodwill
—
—
1,683
—
—
1,683
Spectrum licenses
—
—
23,955
—
—
23,955
Other intangible assets, net
—
—
594
—
—
594
Investments in subsidiaries, net
16,184
32,280
—
—
(48,464
)
—
Intercompany receivables
—
6,130
—
—
(6,130
)
—
Equipment installment plan receivables due after one year, net
—
—
847
—
—
847
Other assets
—
5
387
219
(167
)
444
Total assets
$
16,562
$
42,181
$
57,071
$
1,360
$
(54,761
)
$
62,413
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Current liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
$
—
$
368
$
7,496
$
220
$
—
$
8,084
Payables to affiliates
—
70
65
—
—
135
Short-term debt
—
20
162
—
—
182
Deferred revenue
—
—
717
—
—
717
Other current liabilities
—
—
327
83
—
410
Total current liabilities
—
458
8,767
303
—
9,528
Long-term debt
—
19,797
664
—
—
20,461
Long-term debt to affiliates
—
5,600
—
—
—
5,600
Tower obligations
(1)
—
—
411
2,247
—
2,658
Deferred tax liabilities
—
—
4,228
—
(167
)
4,061
Deferred rent expense
—
—
2,481
—
—
2,481
Negative carrying value of subsidiaries, net
—
—
628
—
(628
)
—
Intercompany payables
5
—
5,959
166
(6,130
)
—
Other long-term liabilities
—
142
922
3
—
1,067
Total long-term liabilities
5
25,539
15,293
2,416
(6,925
)
36,328
Total stockholders' equity
16,557
16,184
33,011
(1,359
)
(47,836
)
16,557
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity
$
16,562
$
42,181
$
57,071
$
1,360
$
(54,761
)
$
62,413
(1)
Assets and liabilities for Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries are primarily included in VIEs related to the 2012 Tower Transaction. See Note 9 – Tower Obligations included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2015
.
19
Table of Contents
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Comprehensive Income Information
Three Months Ended September 30, 2016
(in millions)
Parent
Issuer
Guarantor Subsidiaries
Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries
Consolidating and Eliminating Adjustments
Consolidated
Revenues
Service revenues
$
—
$
—
$
6,822
$
520
$
(209
)
$
7,133
Equipment revenues
—
—
2,049
—
(101
)
1,948
Other revenues
—
—
121
48
(4
)
165
Total revenues
—
—
8,992
568
(314
)
9,246
Operating expenses
Cost of services, exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below
—
—
1,430
6
—
1,436
Cost of equipment sales
—
—
2,340
300
(101
)
2,539
Selling, general and administrative
—
—
2,884
227
(213
)
2,898
Depreciation and amortization
—
—
1,549
19
—
1,568
Cost of MetroPCS business combination
—
—
15
—
—
15
Gains on disposal of spectrum licenses
—
—
(199
)
—
—
(199
)
Total operating expenses
—
—
8,019
552
(314
)
8,257
Operating income
—
—
973
16
—
989
Other income (expense)
Interest expense
—
(303
)
(26
)
(47
)
—
(376
)
Interest expense to affiliates
—
(76
)
—
—
—
(76
)
Interest income
—
7
55
—
—
62
Other expense, net
—
—
(1
)
—
—
(1
)
Total other income (expense), net
—
(372
)
28
(47
)
—
(391
)
Income (loss) before income taxes
—
(372
)
1,001
(31
)
—
598
Income tax (expense) benefit
—
—
(242
)
10
—
(232
)
Earnings (loss) of subsidiaries
366
738
(4
)
—
(1,100
)
—
Net income (loss)
366
366
755
(21
)
(1,100
)
366
Dividends on preferred stock
(13
)
—
—
—
—
(13
)
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders
$
353
$
366
$
755
$
(21
)
$
(1,100
)
$
353
Net Income (loss)
$
366
$
366
$
755
$
(21
)
$
(1,100
)
$
366
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
2
2
2
2
(6
)
2
Total comprehensive income (loss)
$
368
$
368
$
757
$
(19
)
$
(1,106
)
$
368
20
Table of Contents
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Comprehensive Income Information
Three Months Ended September 30, 2015
(in millions)
Parent
Issuer
Guarantor Subsidiaries
Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries
Consolidating and Eliminating Adjustments
Consolidated
Revenues
Service revenues
$
—
$
—
$
6,029
$
428
$
(155
)
$
6,302
Equipment revenues
—
—
1,546
—
(130
)
1,416
Other revenues
—
—
92
42
(3
)
131
Total revenues
—
—
7,667
470
(288
)
7,849
Operating expenses
Cost of services, exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below
—
—
1,372
6
—
1,378
Cost of equipment sales
—
—
1,928
188
(131
)
1,985
Selling, general and administrative
—
—
2,601
180
(157
)
2,624
Depreciation and amortization
—
—
1,137
20
—
1,157
Cost of MetroPCS business combination
—
—
193
—
—
193
Gains on disposal of spectrum licenses
—
—
(1
)
—
—
(1
)
Total operating expenses
—
—
7,230
394
(288
)
7,336
Operating income
—
—
437
76
—
513
Other income (expense)
Interest expense
—
(205
)
(10
)
(47
)
—
(262
)
Interest expense to affiliates
—
(121
)
—
—
—
(121
)
Interest income
—
—
109
—
—
109
Other expense, net
—
(1
)
—
—
—
(1
)
Total other income (expense), net
—
(327
)
99
(47
)
—
(275
)
Income (loss) before income taxes
—
(327
)
536
29
—
238
Income tax expense
—
—
(82
)
(18
)
—
(100
)
Earnings (loss) of subsidiaries
138
465
(10
)
—
(593
)
—
Net income
138
138
444
11
(593
)
138
Dividends on preferred stock
(13
)
—
—
—
—
(13
)
Net income attributable to common stockholders
$
125
$
138
$
444
$
11
$
(593
)
$
125
Net income
$
138
$
138
$
444
$
11
$
(593
)
$
138
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax
(2
)
(2
)
(2
)
—
4
(2
)
Total comprehensive income
$
136
$
136
$
442
$
11
$
(589
)
$
136
21
Table of Contents
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Comprehensive Income Information
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016
(in millions)
Parent
Issuer
Guarantor Subsidiaries
Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries
Consolidating and Eliminating Adjustments
Consolidated
Revenues
Service revenues
$
—
$
—
$
19,683
$
1,500
$
(584
)
$
20,599
Equipment revenues
—
—
6,328
—
(341
)
5,987
Other revenues
—
—
349
145
(13
)
481
Total revenues
—
—
26,360
1,645
(938
)
27,067
Operating expenses
Cost of services, exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below
—
—
4,268
18
—
4,286
Cost of equipment sales
—
—
7,104
768
(340
)
7,532
Selling, general and administrative
—
—
8,372
645
(598
)
8,419
Depreciation and amortization
—
—
4,636
59
—
4,695
Cost of MetroPCS business combination
—
—
110
—
—
110
Gains on disposal of spectrum licenses
—
—
(835
)
—
—
(835
)
Total operating expenses
—
—
23,655
1,490
(938
)
24,207
Operating income
—
—
2,705
155
—
2,860
Other income (expense)
Interest expense
—
(881
)
(61
)
(141
)
—
(1,083
)
Interest expense to affiliates
—
(248
)
—
—
—
(248
)
Interest income
—
23
175
—
—
198
Other expense, net
—
—
(6
)
—
—
(6
)
Total other income (expense), net
—
(1,106
)
108
(141
)
—
(1,139
)
Income (loss) before income taxes
—
(1,106
)
2,813
14
—
1,721
Income tax expense
—
—
(643
)
(8
)
—
(651
)
Earnings (loss) of subsidiaries
1,070
2,176
(15
)
—
(3,231
)
—
Net income
1,070
1,070
2,155
6
(3,231
)
1,070
Dividends on preferred stock
(41
)
—
—
—
—
(41
)
Net income attributable to common stockholders
$
1,029
$
1,070
$
2,155
$
6
$
(3,231
)
$
1,029
Net Income
$
1,070
$
1,070
$
2,155
$
6
$
(3,231
)
$
1,070
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
2
2
2
2
(6
)
2
Total comprehensive income
$
1,072
$
1,072
$
2,157
$
8
$
(3,237
)
$
1,072
22
Table of Contents
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Comprehensive Income Information
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015
(in millions)
Parent
Issuer
Guarantor Subsidiaries
Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries
Consolidating and Eliminating Adjustments
Consolidated
Revenues
Service revenues
$
—
$
—
$
17,470
$
1,227
$
(432
)
$
18,265
Equipment revenues
—
—
5,507
—
(325
)
5,182
Other revenues
—
—
243
126
(10
)
359
Total revenues
—
—
23,220
1,353
(767
)
23,806
Operating expenses
Cost of services, exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below
—
—
4,152
18
—
4,170
Cost of equipment sales
—
—
7,120
531
(326
)
7,325
Selling, general and administrative
—
—
7,347
528
(441
)
7,434
Depreciation and amortization
—
—
3,256
63
—
3,319
Cost of MetroPCS business combination
—
—
355
—
—
355
Gains on disposal of spectrum licenses
—
—
(24
)
—
—
(24
)
Total operating expenses
—
—
22,206
1,140
(767
)
22,579
Operating income
—
—
1,014
213
—
1,227
Other income (expense)
Interest expense
—
(606
)
(33
)
(141
)
—
(780
)
Interest expense to affiliates
—
(277
)
—
—
—
(277
)
Interest income
—
—
335
—
—
335
Other income (expense), net
—
(9
)
1
—
—
(8
)
Total other income (expense), net
—
(892
)
303
(141
)
—
(730
)
Income (loss) before income taxes
—
(892
)
1,317
72
—
497
Income tax expense
—
—
(33
)
(28
)
—
(61
)
Earnings (loss) of subsidiaries
436
1,328
(35
)
—
(1,729
)
—
Net income
436
436
1,249
44
(1,729
)
436
Dividends on preferred stock
(41
)
—
—
—
—
(41
)
Net income attributable to common stockholders
$
395
$
436
$
1,249
$
44
$
(1,729
)
$
395
Net income
$
436
$
436
$
1,249
$
44
$
(1,729
)
$
436
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax
(2
)
(2
)
(2
)
—
4
(2
)
Total comprehensive income
$
434
$
434
$
1,247
$
44
$
(1,725
)
$
434
23
Table of Contents
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows Information
Three Months Ended September 30, 2016
(in millions)
Parent
Issuer
Guarantor Subsidiaries
Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries
Consolidating and Eliminating Adjustments
Consolidated
Operating activities
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
$
1
$
(84
)
$
1,850
$
8
$
(35
)
$
1,740
Investing activities
Purchases of property and equipment
—
—
(1,159
)
—
—
(1,159
)
Purchases of spectrum licenses and other intangible assets, including deposits
—
—
(705
)
—
—
(705
)
Other, net
—
—
5
—
—
5
Net cash used in investing activities
—
—
(1,859
)
—
—
(1,859
)
Financing activities
Repayments of capital lease obligations
—
—
(54
)
—
—
(54
)
Repayments of long-term debt
—
—
(5
)
—
—
(5
)
Tax withholdings on share-based awards
—
—
(3
)
—
—
(3
)
Intercompany dividend paid
—
—
—
(35
)
35
—
Dividends on preferred stock
(13
)
—
—
—
—
(13
)
Other, net
11
—
(3
)
—
—
8
Net cash used in financing activities
(2
)
—
(65
)
(35
)
35
(67
)
Change in cash and cash equivalents
(1
)
(84
)
(74
)
(27
)
—
(186
)
Cash and cash equivalents
Beginning of period
367
2,683
2,439
49
—
5,538
End of period
$
366
$
2,599
$
2,365
$
22
$
—
$
5,352
24
Table of Contents
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows Information
Three Months Ended September 30, 2015
(in millions)
Parent
Issuer
Guarantor Subsidiaries
Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries
Consolidating and Eliminating Adjustments
Consolidated
Operating activities
Net cash provided by operating activities
$
2
$
18
$
1,519
$
32
$
(40
)
$
1,531
Investing activities
Purchases of property and equipment
—
—
(1,120
)
—
—
(1,120
)
Purchases of spectrum licenses and other intangible assets, including deposits
—
—
(94
)
—
—
(94
)
Other, net
—
—
5
—
—
5
Net cash used in investing activities
—
—
(1,209
)
—
—
(1,209
)
Financing activities
Repayments of capital lease obligations
—
—
(13
)
—
—
(13
)
Repayments of short-term debt for purchases of inventory, property and equipment, net
—
—
(315
)
—
—
(315
)
Tax withholdings on share-based awards
—
—
(2
)
—
—
(2
)
Intercompany dividend paid
—
—
—
(40
)
40
—
Dividends on preferred stock
(13
)
—
—
—
—
(13
)
Other, net
8
—
4
—
—
12
Net cash used in financing activities
(5
)
—
(326
)
(40
)
40
(331
)
Change in cash and cash equivalents
(3
)
18
(16
)
(8
)
—
(9
)
Cash and cash equivalents
Beginning of period
393
870
1,316
63
—
2,642
End of period
$
390
$
888
$
1,300
$
55
$
—
$
2,633
25
Table of Contents
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows Information
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016
(in millions)
Parent
Issuer
Guarantor Subsidiaries
Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries
Consolidating and Eliminating Adjustments
Consolidated
Operating activities
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
$
4
$
(2,165
)
$
6,745
$
59
$
(110
)
$
4,533
Investing activities
Purchases of property and equipment
—
—
(3,843
)
—
—
(3,843
)
Purchases of spectrum licenses and other intangible assets, including deposits
—
—
(3,544
)
—
—
(3,544
)
Sales of short-term investments
—
2,000
998
—
—
2,998
Other, net
—
—
3
—
—
3
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
—
2,000
(6,386
)
—
—
(4,386
)
Financing activities
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
—
997
—
—
—
997
Repayments of capital lease obligations
—
—
(133
)
—
—
(133
)
Repayments of short-term debt for purchases of inventory, property and equipment, net
—
—
(150
)
—
—
(150
)
Repayments of long-term debt
—
—
(15
)
—
—
(15
)
Tax withholdings on share-based awards
—
—
(52
)
—
—
(52
)
Intercompany dividend paid
—
—
—
(110
)
110
—
Dividends on preferred stock
(41
)
—
—
—
—
(41
)
Other, net
25
—
(8
)
—
—
17
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
(16
)
997
(358
)
(110
)
110
623
Change in cash and cash equivalents
(12
)
832
1
(51
)
—
770
Cash and cash equivalents
Beginning of period
378
1,767
2,364
73
—
4,582
End of period
$
366
$
2,599
$
2,365
$
22
$
—
$
5,352
26
Table of Contents
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows Information
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015
(in millions)
Parent
Issuer
Guarantor Subsidiaries
Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries
Consolidating and Eliminating Adjustments
Consolidated
Operating activities
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
$
(2
)
$
(3,263
)
$
6,485
$
106
$
(145
)
$
3,181
Investing activities
Purchases of property and equipment
—
—
(3,293
)
—
—
(3,293
)
Purchases of spectrum licenses and other intangible assets, including deposits
—
—
(1,938
)
—
—
(1,938
)
Investment in subsidiaries
(1,905
)
—
—
—
1,905
—
Other, net
—
—
(7
)
—
—
(7
)
Net cash used in investing activities
(1,905
)
—
(5,238
)
—
1,905
(5,238
)
Financing activities
Proceeds from capital contribution
—
1,905
—
—
(1,905
)
—
Repayments of capital lease obligations
—
—
(24
)
—
—
(24
)
Repayments of short-term debt for purchases of inventory, property and equipment, net
—
—
(563
)
—
—
(563
)
Tax withholdings on share-based awards
—
—
(100
)
—
—
(100
)
Intercompany dividend paid
—
—
—
(145
)
145
—
Dividends on preferred stock
(27
)
—
(14
)
—
—
(41
)
Other, net
46
—
57
—
—
103
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
19
1,905
(644
)
(145
)
(1,760
)
(625
)
Change in cash and cash equivalents
(1,888
)
(1,358
)
603
(39
)
—
(2,682
)
Cash and cash equivalents
Beginning of period
2,278
2,246
697
94
—
5,315
End of period
$
390
$
888
$
1,300
$
55
$
—
$
2,633
27
Table of Contents
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
(“
Form 10-Q
”) includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements, other than statements of historical fact, including information concerning our future results of operations, are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are generally identified by the words “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “could” or similar expressions. Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and assumptions, which are subject to risks and uncertainties and may cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements. The following important factors, along with the Risk Factors included in Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, could affect future results and cause those results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements:
•
adverse conditions in the U.S. and international economies or disruptions to the credit and financial markets;
•
competition in the wireless services market;
•
challenges in implementing our business strategies or funding our wireless operations, including payment for additional spectrum, network upgrades and technological advancements;
•
the possibility that we may be unable to renew our spectrum licenses on attractive terms or acquire new spectrum licenses at reasonable costs and terms;
•
difficulties in managing growth in wireless data services, including network quality;
•
material changes in available technology;
•
the timing, scope and financial impact of our deployment of advanced network and business technologies;
•
the impact on our networks and business from major technology equipment failures;
•
breaches of our and/or our third party vendors’ networks, information technology and data security;
•
natural disasters, terrorist attacks or similar incidents;
•
existing or future litigation;
•
any changes in the regulatory environments in which we operate, including any increase in restrictions on the ability to operate our networks;
•
any disruption of our key suppliers’ provisioning of products or services;
•
material adverse changes in labor matters, including labor negotiations or additional organizing activity, and any resulting financial and/or operational impact;
•
the ability to make payments on our debt or to repay our existing indebtedness when due;
•
adverse change in the ratings of our debt securities by nationally accredited rating organizations or adverse conditions in the credit markets affecting the cost, including interest rates, and/or availability of further financing;
•
changes in accounting assumptions that regulatory agencies, including the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), may require or that result from changes in the accounting rules or their application, which could result in an impact on earnings; and,
•
changes in tax laws, regulations and existing standards and the resolution of disputes with any taxing jurisdictions.
Given these risks and uncertainties, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to revise or publicly release the results of any revision to these forward-looking statements, except as required by law. In this
Form 10-Q
, unless the context indicates otherwise, references to “T-Mobile,” “T-Mobile US,” “our Company,” “the Company,” “we,” “our,” and “us” refer to T-Mobile US, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its wholly-owned subsidiaries.
Investors and others should note that we announce material financial and operational information to our investors using our investor relations website, press releases, SEC filings and public conference calls and webcasts. T-Mobile intends to also use the @TMobileIR Twitter account (https://twitter.com/TMobileIR) and the @JohnLegere Twitter (https://twitter.com/JohnLegere), Facebook and Periscope accounts, which Mr. Legere also uses as means for personal communications and observations, as means of disclosing information about the Company, its services and other matters and for complying with its disclosure obligations under Regulation FD. The information we post through these social media channels may be deemed material. Accordingly, investors should monitor these social media channels in addition to following the Company’s press releases, SEC filings and public conference calls and webcasts. The social media channels that T-Mobile intends to use as a means of disclosing the information described above may be updated from time to time as listed on the Company’s investor relations website.
28
Table of Contents
Overview
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) is intended to provide a reader of our consolidated financial statements with a narrative explanation from the perspective of management of our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, liquidity and certain other factors that may affect future results. The MD&A is provided as a supplement to, and should be read in conjunction with, our unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements
included in
Part I, Item 1
of this
Form 10-Q
and audited Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015. Unless expressly stated otherwise, the comparisons presented in this MD&A refer to the same period in the prior year.
Business Overview
In June 2016, we introduced #GetThanked, a history-making move dedicated exclusively to saying “thank you” to our customers. This program, offered to our customers as part of their T-Mobile service: (i) offers eligible new (through December 31, 2016) or existing (as of June 6, 2016) customers ownership in the Company with a free share of T-Mobile stock or an additional share of T-Mobile stock for every new active account each customer refers through December 31, 2016, subject to a maximum of 100 shares in a calendar year, (ii) enables eligible customers who download the T-Mobile Tuesday app to be informed about and to redeem products and services offered by participating business partners each Tuesday and (iii) offers eligible customers a full hour of free in-flight Wi-Fi on their smartphone on all Gogo-equipped domestic flights.
In September 2016, we introduced the latest in our Un-carrier initiatives, T-Mobile ONE and T-Mobile ONE Plus, a move that gives our customers unlimited calls, unlimited text, and unlimited high-speed 4G Long Term Evolution (LTE) data. On T-Mobile ONE, video typically streams at DVD (480p) quality and tethering is at maximum 3G speeds. Customers on T-Mobile ONE Plus plans also receive unlimited high-speed 4G LTE mobile hotspot data, unlimited High Definition Day Passes, and up to two times faster speeds when traveling abroad in 140+ countries and destinations.
On September 1, 2016, we sold our marketing and distribution rights to certain existing T-Mobile co-branded customers to a current Mobile Virtual Network Operator (“MVNO”) partner for nominal consideration (the “MVNO Transaction”). Upon the sale, the MVNO Transaction resulted in a transfer of
1,365,000
branded postpaid phone customers and
326,000
branded prepaid customers to wholesale customers. Prospectively from September 1, 2016, revenue for these customers is recorded within wholesale revenues in our
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
. Additionally, the impact of the MVNO Transaction resulted in improvements to branded postpaid phone churn for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2016
.
During the quarter ended and subsequent to September 30, 2016, a handset Original Equipment Manufacturer (“OEM”) announced recalls on certain of its smartphone devices. As a result, we recorded no revenue associated with the device sales to customers and impaired the devices to their net realizable value. The OEM has agreed to reimburse T-Mobile, as such, we have recorded an amount due from the OEM as an offset to the loss recorded in
Cost of equipment sales
in our
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
and a reduction to
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
in our
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
.
Results of Operations
Highlights for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2016
•
Total revenues of
$9.2 billion
for the
three months ended September 30, 2016
increased
$1.4 billion
, or
18%
, compared to the same period in
2015
. Total revenues of
$27.1 billion
for the
nine months ended September 30, 2016
increased
$3.3 billion
, or
14%
, compared to the same period in
2015
. The
increases
were primarily from growth in service and equipment revenues as discussed below.
•
Service revenues of
$7.1 billion
for the
three months ended September 30, 2016
increased
$831 million
, or
13%
, compared to the same period in
2015
. Service revenues of
$20.6 billion
for the
nine months ended September 30, 2016
increased
$2.3 billion
, or
13%
, compared to the same period in
2015
. The
increases
were primarily due to growth in our average branded customer base as a result of the strong customer response to our Un-carrier initiatives and the success of our MetroPCS brand promotional activities and continued growth in new markets.
•
Equipment revenues of
$1.9 billion
for the
three months ended September 30, 2016
increased
$532 million
, or
38%
, compared to the same period in
2015
. Equipment revenues of
$6.0 billion
for the
nine months ended September 30, 2016
increased
$805 million
, or
16%
, compared to the same period of
2015
. The increases were primarily due to
29
Table of Contents
higher lease revenues and an increase in the number of devices sold. The increase for the
nine months ended September 30, 2016
was partially offset by a lower average revenue per device sold.
•
Branded postpaid phone churn of
1.32%
for the
three months ended September 30, 2016
decreased
14
basis points, compared to the same period in
2015
. Branded postpaid phone churn of
1.30%
for the
nine months ended September 30, 2016
decreased
6
basis points, compared to the same period in
2015
. The improvements in branded postpaid phone churn for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2016
was primarily the result of the MVNO Transaction and increased customer satisfaction and loyalty from ongoing improvements to network quality, customer service and the overall value of our offerings in the marketplace.
•
Operating income of
$1.0 billion
for the
three months ended September 30, 2016
increased
$476 million
, compared to the same period in
2015
. Operating income of
$2.9 billion
for the
nine months ended September 30, 2016
increased
$1.6 billion
, compared to the same period in
2015
. The
increases
were primarily due to higher total revenues, partially offset by an increase in depreciation and amortization primarily related to devices leased under our JUMP! On Demand Program, higher costs to support customer growth and retention initiatives and higher cost of equipment sales resulting from increases in the number of devices sold. An additional factor driving the
increases
for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2016
included gains on disposal of spectrum licenses of
$199 million
and
$835 million
, respectively, compared to
$1 million
and
$24 million
, for the same periods in
2015
.
•
Net income of
$366 million
for the
three months ended September 30, 2016
increased
$228 million
, or
165%
, compared to the same period in
2015
. Net income of
$1.1 billion
for the
nine months ended September 30, 2016
increased
$634 million
, or
145%
, compared to the same period in
2015
. The increases were primarily a result of higher operating income driven by the factors described above, partially offset by higher interest expense related to higher average debt and higher income tax expense. The
three and nine months ended September 30, 2016
included
$122 million
and
$511 million
of net, after-tax gains on disposal of spectrum licenses, respectively.
•
Adjusted EBITDA (see “Performance Measures”), a non-GAAP financial measure, of
$2.6 billion
for the
three months ended September 30, 2016
increased
$722 million
, or
38%
, compared to the same period in
2015
. Adjusted EBITDA of
$7.8 billion
for the
nine months ended September 30, 2016
increased
$2.7 billion
, or
53%
, compared to the same period in
2015
. These
increases
were primarily due to higher service revenues and gains on disposal of spectrum licenses, partially offset by increases in selling, general and administrative expenses. An additional factor driving the
increase
for the
nine months ended September 30, 2016
included lower losses on equipment primarily due to the impact of customers leasing devices with JUMP! On Demand.
•
Net cash provided by operating activities of
$1.7 billion
for the
three months ended September 30, 2016
increased
$209 million
, or
14%
, compared to the same period in
2015
. Net cash provided by operating activities of
$4.5 billion
for the
nine months ended September 30, 2016
increased
$1.4 billion
, or
43%
, compared to the same period in
2015
. The
increases
were primarily due to an increase in net non-cash income and expenses included in Net income primarily due to changes in Depreciation and Amortization, Gains on disposal of spectrum licenses and Deferred income tax expense as well as an increase in Net income. The
increases
were partially offset by an increase in net cash outflows from changes in working capital.
•
Free Cash Flow (see “Performance Measures”), a non-GAAP financial measure, of
$581 million
for the
three months ended September 30, 2016
increased
$170 million
, or
41%
, compared to the same period in
2015
. Free Cash Flow of
$690 million
for the
nine months ended September 30, 2016
increased
$802 million
, or
716%
, compared to the same period in
2015
. The
increases
were primarily from higher net cash provided by operating activities as discussed above, partially offset by higher purchases of property and equipment from the build-out of our LTE network.
30
Table of Contents
Set forth below is a summary of consolidated results:
Three Months Ended September 30,
Change
Nine Months Ended September 30,
Change
(in millions)
2016
2015
$
%
2016
2015
$
%
Revenues
Branded postpaid revenues
$
4,647
$
4,197
$
450
11
%
$
13,458
$
12,046
$
1,412
12
%
Branded prepaid revenues
2,182
1,894
288
15
%
6,326
5,597
729
13
%
Wholesale revenues
238
170
68
40
%
645
492
153
31
%
Roaming and other service revenues
66
41
25
61
%
170
130
40
31
%
Total service revenues
7,133
6,302
831
13
%
20,599
18,265
2,334
13
%
Equipment revenues
1,948
1,416
532
38
%
5,987
5,182
805
16
%
Other revenues
165
131
34
26
%
481
359
122
34
%
Total revenues
9,246
7,849
1,397
18
%
27,067
23,806
3,261
14
%
Operating expenses
Cost of services, exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below
1,436
1,378
58
4
%
4,286
4,170
116
3
%
Cost of equipment sales
2,539
1,985
554
28
%
7,532
7,325
207
3
%
Selling, general and administrative
2,898
2,624
274
10
%
8,419
7,434
985
13
%
Depreciation and amortization
1,568
1,157
411
36
%
4,695
3,319
1,376
41
%
Cost of MetroPCS business combination
15
193
(178
)
(92
)%
110
355
(245
)
(69
)%
Gains on disposal of spectrum licenses
(199
)
(1
)
(198
)
NM
(835
)
(24
)
(811
)
NM
Total operating expenses
8,257
7,336
921
13
%
24,207
22,579
1,628
7
%
Operating income
989
513
476
93
%
2,860
1,227
1,633
NM
Other income (expense)
Interest expense
(376
)
(262
)
(114
)
44
%
(1,083
)
(780
)
(303
)
39
%
Interest expense to affiliates
(76
)
(121
)
45
(37
)%
(248
)
(277
)
29
(10
)%
Interest income
62
109
(47
)
(43
)%
198
335
(137
)
(41
)%
Other expense, net
(1
)
(1
)
—
NM
(6
)
(8
)
2
(25
)%
Total other expense, net
(391
)
(275
)
(116
)
42
%
(1,139
)
(730
)
(409
)
56
%
Income before income taxes
598
238
360
151
%
1,721
497
1,224
246
%
Income tax expense
(232
)
(100
)
(132
)
132
%
(651
)
(61
)
(590
)
967
%
Net income
$
366
$
138
$
228
165
%
$
1,070
$
436
$
634
145
%
Net cash provided by operating activities
$
1,740
$
1,531
$
209
14
%
$
4,533
$
3,181
$
1,352
43
%
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
Adjusted EBITDA
$
2,630
$
1,908
$
722
38
%
$
7,843
$
5,113
$
2,730
53
%
Free Cash Flow
581
411
170
41
%
690
(112
)
802
716
%
NM – Not Meaningful
Revenues
Branded postpaid revenues
increased
$450 million
, or
11%
, for the
three months ended
and
$1.4 billion
, or
12%
, for the
nine months ended September 30, 2016
, compared to the same periods in
2015
, primarily due to a
13%
and
15%
increase, respectively, in the number of average branded postpaid phone and mobile broadband customers, driven by strong customer response to our Un-carrier initiatives and promotions for services and devices. The growth in our customer base also drove increases in our device insurance program revenues for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2016
. The increase for the
three months ended September 30, 2016
was partially offset by an increase in the non-cash net revenue deferral for Data Stash and from the impact of the MVNO Transaction. Higher regulatory program revenues also contributed to the increase for the
nine months ended September 30, 2016
, partially offset by lower branded postpaid phone average revenue per user (“ARPU”) primarily due to an increase in the non-cash net revenue deferral for Data Stash.
Branded prepaid revenues
increased
$288 million
, or
15%
, for the
three months ended
and
$729 million
, or
13%
, for the
nine months ended September 30, 2016
, compared to the same periods in
2015
, primarily due to growth in the number of average branded prepaid customers driven by the success of our MetroPCS brand promotional activities and continued growth in new markets.
31
Table of Contents
Wholesale revenues
increased
$68 million
, or
40%
, for the
three months ended
and
$153 million
, or
31%
, for the
nine months ended September 30, 2016
, compared to the same periods in
2015
, primarily due to an increase in data usage per customer and growth in customers of certain MVNO partners, including the impact of the MVNO Transaction.
Roaming and other service revenues
increased
$25 million
, or
61%
, for the
three months ended
and
$40 million
, or
31%
, for the
nine months ended September 30, 2016
, compared to the same periods in
2015
, primarily due to higher international roaming revenues driven by an increase in inbound roaming volumes.
Equipment revenues
increased
$532 million
, or
38%
, for the
three months ended
and
$805 million
, or
16%
, for the
nine months ended September 30, 2016
, compared to the same periods in
2015
, primarily due to the following:
•
Increases of
$323 million
and
$1.0 billion
in lease revenues for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2016
, respectively, which are recognized over the lease term, resulting from the launch of our JUMP! On Demand program at the end of the second quarter of
2015
;
•
An
increase
of
$209 million
in device sales revenues for the
three months ended September 30, 2016
, primarily due to a
19%
increase
in the number of devices sold. Device sales revenue is recognized at the time of sale.
•
A
decline
of
$227 million
in device sales revenues for the
nine months ended September 30, 2016
primarily due to a lower average revenue per device sold resulting from promotions for devices and the impact of our JUMP! On Demand program launched at the end of the second quarter of 2015, partially offset by a
5%
increase
in the number of devices sold as well as an increase in the number of accessories sold.
During the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2016
, we provided
$1.4 billion
and
$4.2 billion
, respectively, in gross equipment installment plan (“EIP”) device financing to our customers, which
increased
by
$265 million
and
decreased
by
$107 million
, respectively, compared to the same periods in
2015
. The
increase
for the
three months ended September 30, 2016
was primarily due to an increase in devices financed through EIP due to focus on devices financed on EIP in the third quarter of 2016, compared to focus on devices financed on JUMP! On Demand in the third quarter of
2015
. The
decrease
for the
nine months ended September 30, 2016
was primarily due to a decline in devices financed through EIP.
Other revenues
increased
$34 million
, or
26%
, for the
three months ended
and
$122 million
, or
34%
, for the
nine months ended September 30, 2016
, compared to the same periods in
2015
, primarily due to higher revenue from revenue share agreements with third parties. Higher lease income associated with reciprocal spectrum license lease agreements also contributed to the increase for the
nine months ended September 30, 2016
.
Operating Expenses
Cost of services
increased
$58 million
, or
4%
, for the
three months ended
and
$116 million
, or
3%
, for the
nine months ended September 30, 2016
, compared to the same periods in
2015
, primarily due to higher regulatory program costs and expenses associated with network expansion and the build-out of our network to utilize our 700 MHz A-Block spectrum licenses, including higher employee-related costs. The
increases
for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2016
were partially offset by synergies realized from the decommissioning of the MetroPCS Code Division Multiple Access (“CDMA”) network and lower long distance and toll costs. In addition, higher lease expense associated with reciprocal spectrum license lease agreements contributed to the
increase
for the
nine months ended September 30, 2016
.
Cost of equipment sales
increased
$554 million
, or
28%
, for the
three months ended
and
$207 million
, or
3%
, for the
nine months ended September 30, 2016
, compared to the same periods in
2015
.
•
The
increase
for the
three months ended September 30, 2016
was primarily due to a
19%
increase
in the number of devices sold and a higher average cost per device sold;
•
The
increase
for the
nine months ended September 30, 2016
was primarily due to a
5%
increase
in the number of devices sold as well as an increase in the number of accessories sold, partially offset by a lower average cost per device sold primarily due to the impact of our JUMP! On Demand program launched at the end of the second quarter of 2015. The impact from returned and purchased leased devices and an increase in insurance claims costs also contributed to the
increase
for the
nine months ended September 30, 2016
. With JUMP! On Demand, the cost of the leased wireless device is capitalized and recognized as depreciation expense over the term of the lease rather than recognized as cost of equipment sales when the device is delivered to the customer.
32
Table of Contents
Selling, general and administrative
increased
$274 million
, or
10%
, for the
three months ended
and
$985 million
, or
13%
, for the
nine months ended September 30, 2016
, compared to the same periods in
2015
, primarily attributable to strategic investments to support our growing customer base, including higher employee-related costs, higher commissions driven by an increase in branded customer additions and higher promotional costs.
Depreciation and amortization
increased
$411 million
, or
36%
, for the
three months ended
and
$1.4 billion
, or
41%
, for the
nine months ended September 30, 2016
, compared to the same periods in
2015
, primarily due to
$367 million
and
$1.2 billion
, respectively, in depreciation expense related to devices leased under our JUMP! On Demand program launched at the end of the second quarter of
2015
, as well as
increases
resulting from the build-out of our LTE network. With JUMP! On Demand, the cost of a leased wireless device is depreciated over the lease term to its estimated residual value.
Cost of MetroPCS business combination
of
$15 million
for the
three months ended
and
$110 million
for the
nine months ended September 30, 2016
, primarily reflects network decommissioning costs associated with the business combination. We do not expect to incur significant additional network decommissioning costs as cell site assets are removed in 2016.
Gains on disposal of spectrum licenses
of
$199 million
for the
three months ended September 30, 2016
consisted of gains from spectrum license transactions during the
third quarter of
2016
.
Gains on disposal of spectrum licenses
of
$835 million
for the
nine months ended September 30, 2016
also included a gain of
$636 million
from a spectrum license transaction with AT&T Inc. recorded in the first quarter of
2016
. Gains on disposal of spectrum licenses of
$24 million
for the
nine months ended September 30, 2015
primarily consisted of a gain from a spectrum license transaction with Verizon recorded in the second quarter of
2015
. See
Note 2 – Significant Transactions
of the
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
.
Other Income (Expense)
Interest expense
increased
$114 million
, or
44%
, for the
three months ended
and
$303 million
, or
39%
, for the
nine months ended September 30, 2016
, compared to the same periods in
2015
, primarily due to higher debt balances with third parties for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2016
, compared to the same periods in
2015
, as well as lower capitalized interest costs associated with the build out of our network to utilize our 700 MHz A-Block spectrum licenses.
Interest expense to affiliates
decreased
$45 million
, or
37%
, for the
three months ended
and
$29 million
, or
10%
, for the
nine months ended September 30, 2016
, compared to the same periods in
2015
, primarily due to changes in the fair value of embedded derivative instruments associated with Senior Reset Notes issued to Deutsche Telekom AG (“Deutsche Telekom”) in 2015. The
decreases
for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2016
were partially offset by an increase in interest rates on certain Senior Reset Notes issued to Deutsche Telekom, which were adjusted at reset dates in the
second quarter of
2016
and in
2015
, as well as lower capitalized interest costs associated with the build out of our network to utilize our 700 MHz A-Block spectrum licenses.
Interest income
decreased
$47 million
, or
43%
, for the
three months ended
and
$137 million
, or
41%
, for the
nine months ended September 30, 2016
, compared to the same periods in
2015
, primarily due to a decline in imputed interest income associated with devices financed through EIP resulting from sales of certain EIP receivables pursuant to our EIP receivables sales arrangement and following the launch of our JUMP! On Demand program at the end of the
second quarter of
2015
. Interest associated with EIP receivables, which is imputed at the time of a device sale and then recognized over the financed installment term, was
$59 million
and
$189 million
for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2016
, respectively, compared to
$108 million
and
$331 million
for the same periods in
2015
. See
Note 4 – Equipment Installment Plan Receivables
of the
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
.
Income Taxes
Income tax expense
was
$232 million
and
$100 million
for the
three months ended
September 30, 2016
and
2015
, respectively, and
$651 million
and
$61 million
for the
nine months ended September 30, 2016
and
2015
, respectively. The effective tax rate was
38.8%
and
42.0%
for the
three months ended
September 30, 2016
and
2015
, respectively, and
37.8%
and
12.3%
for the
nine months ended September 30, 2016
and
2015
, respectively. The lower effective income tax rate for the three months ended September 30, 2016 compared to the same period in 2015 resulted primarily from the increase in income before income taxes and the resulting decrease in the impact of unfavorable tax items. The higher effective income tax rate for the
nine months ended September 30, 2016
compared to the same period in
2015
resulted from income tax benefits for discrete income tax items recognized in
2015
that did not impact
2016
, including certain changes in state and local income tax laws and
33
Table of Contents
the recognition of certain federal tax credits. The increase in the effective income tax rate for the
nine months ended September 30, 2016
was partially offset by the recognition of
$24 million
of excess tax benefits related to share-based payments in
Income tax expense
resulting from the adoption of ASU 2016-09 as of January 1, 2016. See
Note 1 – Basis of Presentation
of the
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
.
Net Income
Net income
increased
$228 million
, or
165%
, for the
three months ended
and
$634 million
, or
145%
, for the
nine months ended September 30, 2016
, compared to the same periods in
2015
, as a result of the factors described above. The
three and nine months ended September 30, 2016
included
$122 million
and
$511 million
of net, after-tax gains on disposal of spectrum licenses, respectively.
Guarantor Subsidiaries
The financial condition and results of operations of the Parent, Issuer and Guarantor Subsidiaries is substantially similar to the Company’s consolidated financial condition.
The most significant components of the financial condition of our Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries were as follows:
September 30,
2016
December 31,
2015
Change
(in millions)
$
%
Other current assets
$
497
$
400
$
97
24
%
Property and equipment, net
395
454
(59
)
(13
)%
Tower obligations
2,224
2,247
(23
)
(1
)%
Total stockholders' deficit
(1,356
)
(1,359
)
3
—
%
The most significant components of the results of operations of our Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries were as follows:
Three Months Ended September 30,
Change
Nine Months Ended September 30,
Change
(in millions)
2016
2015
$
%
2016
2015
$
%
Service revenues
$
520
$
428
$
92
21
%
$
1,500
$
1,227
$
273
22
%
Cost of equipment sales
300
188
112
60
%
768
531
237
45
%
Selling, general and administrative
227
180
47
26
%
645
528
117
22
%
Total comprehensive income (loss)
(19
)
11
(30
)
(273
)%
8
44
(36
)
(82
)%
The increases in Service revenues, Cost of equipment sales and Selling, general and administrative were primarily the result of an increase in activity of the non-guarantor subsidiary that provides device insurance, primarily driven by growth in our customer base. All other results of operations of the Parent, Issuer and Guarantor Subsidiaries are substantially similar to the Company’s consolidated results of operations. See
Note 9 – Guarantor Financial Information
of the
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
.
Performance Measures
In managing our business and assessing financial performance, we supplement the information provided by our financial statements with other operating or statistical data and non-GAAP financial measures. These operating and financial measures are utilized by our management to evaluate our operating performance and, in certain cases, our ability to meet liquidity requirements. Although companies in the wireless industry may not define each of these measures in precisely the same way, we believe that these measures facilitate comparisons with other companies in the wireless industry on key operating and financial measures.
Total Customers
A customer is generally defined as a SIM card with a unique T-Mobile identity number which is associated with an account that generates revenue. Branded customers generally include customers that are qualified either for postpaid service utilizing phones or mobile broadband devices (including tablets), where they generally pay after receiving service, or prepaid service, where they generally pay in advance. Wholesale customers include Machine-to-Machine (“M2M”) and MVNO customers that operate on our network, but are managed by wholesale partners.
34
Table of Contents
The following table sets forth the number of ending customers:
September 30,
2016
September 30,
2015
Change
(in thousands)
#
%
Customers, end of period
Branded postpaid phone customers
30,364
28,438
1,926
7
%
Branded postpaid mobile broadband customers
2,866
1,965
901
46
%
Total branded postpaid customers
33,230
30,403
2,827
9
%
Branded prepaid customers
19,272
17,162
2,110
12
%
Total branded customers
52,502
47,565
4,937
10
%
Wholesale customers
16,852
13,655
3,197
23
%
Total customers, end of period
69,354
61,220
8,134
13
%
The following table sets forth the number of net customer additions:
Three Months Ended September 30,
Change
Nine Months Ended September 30,
Change
(in thousands)
2016
2015
#
%
2016
2015
#
%
Net customer additions
Branded postpaid phone customers
851
843
8
1
%
2,374
2,594
(220
)
(8
)%
Branded postpaid mobile broadband customers
118
242
(124
)
(51
)%
526
624
(98
)
(16
)%
Total branded postpaid customers
969
1,085
(116
)
(11
)%
2,900
3,218
(318
)
(10
)%
Branded prepaid customers
684
595
89
15
%
1,967
846
1,121
NM
Total branded customers
1,653
1,680
(27
)
(2
)%
4,867
4,064
803
20
%
Wholesale customers
317
632
(315
)
(50
)%
1,205
2,138
(933
)
(44
)%
Total net customer additions
1,970
2,312
(342
)
(15
)%
6,072
6,202
(130
)
(2
)%
Transfer from branded postpaid phone customers
(1,365
)
—
(1,365
)
100
%
(1,365
)
—
(1,365
)
100
%
Transfer from branded prepaid customers
(326
)
—
(326
)
100
%
(326
)
—
(326
)
100
%
Transfer to wholesale customers
1,691
—
1,691
100
%
1,691
—
1,691
100
%
NM – Not Meaningful
Net customer additions were
1,970,000
for the
three months ended
September 30, 2016
, compared to
2,312,000
for the same period in
2015
. Net customer additions were
6,072,000
for the
nine months ended
September 30, 2016
, compared to
6,202,000
for the same period in
2015
. At
September 30, 2016
, we had
69.4 million
total customers, a
13%
increase
from the total as of
September 30, 2015
, as a result of growth in the customer categories described below. The MVNO Transaction resulted in a transfer of
1,365,000
branded postpaid phone customers and
326,000
branded prepaid customers to wholesale customers on September 1, 2016. Prospectively from September 1, 2016, net customer additions for these customers are included within Wholesale customers. Ending customers as of September 30, 2016 reflect the transfers in connection with the MVNO Transaction.
Branded Customers
Total branded net customer additions
decreased
27,000
, or
2%
, for the
three months ended
September 30, 2016
, compared to the same period in
2015
, primarily due to the following:
•
Lower branded postpaid mobile broadband net customer additions primarily due to higher deactivations resulting from a growing branded postpaid mobile broadband customer base; partially offset by
•
Higher branded prepaid net customer additions primarily due to the success of our MetroPCS brand promotional activities and continued growth in new markets, partially offset by an increase in the number of qualified branded prepaid customers migrating to branded postpaid plans; and
•
Higher branded postpaid phone net customer additions primarily due to an increase in the number of qualified branded prepaid customers migrating to branded postpaid plans, partially offset by lower gross customer additions primarily due to an increase in competitive activity.
35
Table of Contents
Total branded net customer additions
increased
803,000
, or
20%
, for the
nine months ended
September 30, 2016
, compared to the same period in
2015
, primarily due to the following:
•
Higher branded prepaid net customer additions primarily due to the success of our MetroPCS brand promotional activities and continued growth in new markets; partially offset by an increase in the number of qualified branded prepaid customers migrating to branded postpaid plans;
•
Lower branded postpaid phone net customer additions primarily due to higher deactivations resulting from a growing branded postpaid phone customer base, partially offset by lower branded postpaid phone churn as well as an increase in the number of qualified branded prepaid customers migrating to branded postpaid plans; and
•
Lower branded postpaid mobile broadband net customer additions primarily due to higher deactivations resulting from a growing branded postpaid mobile broadband customer base, partially offset by higher gross customer additions.
Wholesale
Wholesale net customer additions
decreased
315,000
, or
50%
, for the
three months ended
September 30, 2016
, compared to the same period in
2015
, primarily due to lower gross customer additions.
Wholesale net customer additions
decreased
933,000
, or
44%
, for the
nine months ended
September 30, 2016
, compared to the same period in
2015
, primarily due to higher deactivations resulting from a growing customer base and lower gross customer additions.
Customers Per Account
Customers per account is calculated by dividing the number of branded postpaid customers as of the end of the period by the number of branded postpaid accounts as of the end of the period. An account may include branded postpaid phone and mobile broadband customers. We believe branded postpaid customers per account provides management with useful information to evaluate our branded postpaid customer base on a per account basis.
September 30,
2016
September 30,
2015
Change
#
%
Branded postpaid customers per account
2.78
2.48
0.30
12
%
Branded postpaid customers per account
increased
primarily due to ongoing service promotions targeting families, increased penetration of mobile broadband devices and the impact of the MVNO Transaction.
Churn
Churn represents the number of customers whose service was disconnected as a percentage of the average number of customers during the specified period. The number of customers whose service was disconnected is presented net of customers that subsequently have their service restored within a certain period of time. We believe that churn provides management with useful information to evaluate customer retention and loyalty.
Three Months Ended September 30,
Bps Change
Nine Months Ended September 30,
Bps Change
2016
2015
2016
2015
Branded postpaid phone churn
1.32
%
1.46
%
-14 bps
1.30
%
1.36
%
-6 bps
Branded prepaid churn
3.82
%
4.09
%
-27 bps
3.86
%
4.54
%
-68 bps
Branded postpaid phone churn
decreased
14
basis points for the
three months ended
and
6
basis point for the
nine months ended
September 30, 2016
, compared to the same periods in
2015
, and was primarily impacted by the MVNO Transaction, which had a higher rate of branded postpaid phone churn and increased customer satisfaction and loyalty from ongoing improvements to network quality, customer service and the overall value of our offerings in the marketplace. If the MVNO transaction had occurred on July 1, 2016, reported postpaid phone churn would have been 12 basis points lower at 1.20% for the three months ended September 30, 2016.
Branded prepaid churn
decreased
27
basis points for the
three months ended
and
68
basis points for the
nine months ended
September 30, 2016
, compared to the same periods in
2015
, and was primarily impacted by a decrease in certain customers,
36
Table of Contents
which had a higher rate of branded prepaid churn, as well as strong performance of the MetroPCS brand. Additionally, branded prepaid churn for the
nine months ended September 30, 2016
was impacted by a methodology change in the third quarter of
2015
that had no impact on our reported branded prepaid ending customers or net customer additions, but resulted in computationally lower branded prepaid gross customer additions and deactivations. Revision of prior periods in
2015
was not practicable because certain historical data was no longer available.
Average Revenue Per User, Average Billings Per User
ARPU represents the average monthly service revenue earned from customers. We believe ARPU provides management, investors and analysts with useful information to assess and evaluate our service revenue realization per customer and assist in forecasting our future service revenues generated from our customer base. Branded postpaid phone ARPU excludes mobile broadband customers and related revenues.
Average Billings Per User (“ABPU”) represents the average monthly customer billings, including monthly lease revenues and EIP billings, per customer. We believe branded postpaid ABPU provides management, investors and analysts with useful information to evaluate average branded postpaid customer billings as it is indicative of estimated cash collections, including device financing payments, from our customers each month.
The following tables illustrate the calculation of our operating measures ARPU and ABPU and reconcile these measures to the related service revenues:
(in millions, except average number of customers, ARPU and ABPU)
Three Months Ended September 30,
Change
Nine Months Ended September 30,
Change
2016
2015
#
%
2016
2015
#
%
Calculation of Branded Postpaid Phone ARPU
Branded postpaid service revenues
$
4,647
$
4,197
$
450
11
%
$
13,458
$
12,046
$
1,412
12
%
Less: Branded postpaid mobile broadband revenues
(193
)
(165
)
(28
)
17
%
(568
)
(409
)
(159
)
39
%
Branded postpaid phone service revenues
$
4,454
$
4,032
$
422
10
%
$
12,890
$
11,637
$
1,253
11
%
Divided by: Average number of branded postpaid phone customers (in thousands) and number of months in period
30,836
28,003
2,833
10
%
30,364
27,189
3,175
12
%
Branded postpaid phone ARPU
$
48.15
$
47.99
$
0.16
NM
$
47.17
$
47.55
$
(0.38
)
(1
)%
Calculation of Branded Postpaid ABPU
Branded postpaid service revenues
$
4,647
$
4,197
$
450
11
%
$
13,458
$
12,046
$
1,412
12
%
EIP billings
1,394
1,409
(15
)
(1
)%
4,062
4,094
(32
)
(1
)%
Lease revenues
353
30
323
NM
1,062
30
1,032
NM
Total billings for branded postpaid customers
$
6,394
$
5,636
$
758
13
%
$
18,582
$
16,170
$
2,412
15
%
Divided by: Average number of branded postpaid customers (in thousands) and number of months in period
33,632
29,838
3,794
13
%
32,966
28,784
4,182
15
%
Branded postpaid ABPU
$
63.38
$
62.96
$
0.42
1
%
$
62.63
$
62.42
$
0.21
NM
Calculation of Branded Prepaid ARPU
Branded prepaid service revenues
$
2,182
$
1,894
$
288
15
%
$
6,326
$
5,597
$
729
13
%
Divided by: Average number of branded prepaid customers (in thousands) and number of months in period
19,134
16,853
2,281
14
%
18,586
16,496
2,090
13
%
Branded prepaid ARPU
$
38.01
$
37.46
$
0.55
1
%
$
37.82
$
37.70
$
0.12
NM
NM – Not Meaningful
Branded postpaid phone ARPU
increased
$0.16
, or flat, for the
three months ended
and
decreased
$0.38
, or
1%
, for the
nine months ended
September 30, 2016
, compared to the same periods in
2015
, primarily due to an increase in the non-cash net revenue deferrals for Data Stash and dilution from continued growth of customers on promotions targeting families, partially offset by continued growth of our insurance programs and higher data attach rates. The transfer of customers as part of the MVNO transaction contributed to the increase for the three months ended September 30, 2016. Higher regulatory program revenues also contributed to an increase for the
nine months ended September 30, 2016
.
37
Table of Contents
Branded postpaid ABPU
increased
$0.42
, or
1%
, for the
three months ended
and
$0.21
, or flat, for the
nine months ended
September 30, 2016
, compared to the same periods in
2015
, primarily due to
increases
in lease revenues and the impact from the transfer of customers as part of the MVNO Transaction, partially offset by lower EIP billings, an increase in the non-cash net revenue deferrals for Data Stash, dilution from continued growth of customers on promotions targeting families and increased penetration of mobile broadband devices. The
decreases
in EIP billings were primarily due to the impact of our JUMP! On Demand program launched at the end of the second quarter of
2015
.
Branded prepaid ARPU
increased
$0.55
, or
1%
, for the
three months ended
and
$0.12
, or flat, for the
nine months ended
September 30, 2016
, compared to the same periods in
2015
, primarily due to a decrease in certain customers that had lower average branded prepaid ARPU, as well as higher data attach rates. The
increases
were partially offset by dilution from growth of customers on rate plan promotions.
Adjusted EBITDA
Adjusted EBITDA represents earnings before interest expense, net of Interest income, Income tax expense, Depreciation and amortization, non-cash Stock-based compensation and certain expenses not reflective of T-Mobile’s operating performance. Net income margin represents Net income divided by Service revenues. Adjusted EBITDA margin represents Adjusted EBITDA divided by Service revenues.
Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure utilized by our management to monitor the financial performance of our operations. We use Adjusted EBITDA internally as a metric to evaluate and compensate our personnel and management for their performance, and as a benchmark to evaluate our operating performance in comparison to our competitors. Management believes analysts and investors use Adjusted EBITDA as a supplemental measure to evaluate overall operating performance and facilitate comparisons with other wireless communications companies because it is indicative of our ongoing operating performance and trends by excluding the impact of interest expense from financing, non-cash depreciation and amortization from capital investments as well as non-cash stock-based compensation and certain other nonrecurring expenses. Adjusted EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for income from operations, net income or any other measure of financial performance reported in accordance with GAAP.
The following table illustrates the calculation of Adjusted EBITDA and reconciles Adjusted EBITDA to Net income, which we consider to be the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure:
Three Months Ended September 30,
Change
Nine Months Ended September 30,
Change
(in millions)
2016
2015
$
%
2016
2015
$
%
Net income
$
366
$
138
$
228
165
%
$
1,070
$
436
$
634
145
%
Adjustments:
Interest expense
376
262
114
44
%
1,083
780
303
39
%
Interest expense to affiliates
76
121
(45
)
(37
)%
248
277
(29
)
(10
)%
Interest income
(62
)
(109
)
47
(43
)%
(198
)
(335
)
137
(41
)%
Other expense, net
1
1
—
NM
6
8
(2
)
(25
)%
Income tax expense
232
100
132
132
%
651
61
590
967
%
Operating income
989
513
476
93
%
2,860
1,227
1,633
NM
Depreciation and amortization
1,568
1,157
411
36
%
4,695
3,319
1,376
41
%
Cost of MetroPCS business combination
15
193
(178
)
(92
)%
110
355
(245
)
(69
)%
Stock-based compensation
(1)
57
43
14
33
%
171
170
1
1
%
Other, net
1
2
(1
)
(50
)%
7
42
(35
)
(83
)%
Adjusted EBITDA
$
2,630
$
1,908
$
722
38
%
$
7,843
$
5,113
$
2,730
53
%
Net income margin (Net income divided by service revenues)
5
%
2
%
300 bps
5
%
2
%
300 bps
Adjusted EBITDA margin (Adjusted EBITDA divided by service revenues)
37
%
30
%
700 bps
38
%
28
%
1000 bps
NM – Not Meaningful
(1)
Stock-based compensation includes payroll tax impacts and may not agree to stock-based compensation expense in the condensed consolidated financial statements.
38
Table of Contents
Adjusted EBITDA
increased
$722 million
, or
38%
, for the
three months ended
and
$2.7 billion
, or
53%
, for the
nine months ended
September 30, 2016
, compared to the same periods in
2015
, primarily due to the following:
•
Increased branded postpaid and prepaid service revenues primarily due to strong customer response to our Un-carrier initiatives and the ongoing success of our promotional activities;
•
Higher gains on disposal of spectrum licenses;
•
Lower losses on equipment for the
nine months ended
September 30, 2016
primarily due to the impact of customers leasing devices with JUMP! On Demand, as the costs of leased devices, which are capitalized and depreciated over the lease term, are excluded from Adjusted EBITDA. In connection with JUMP! On Demand, we had lease revenues of
$353 million
and
$1.1 billion
for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2016
, respectively, and depreciation expense of
$367 million
and
$1.2 billion
related to leased wireless devices for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2016
, respectively; and
•
Focused cost control and synergies realized from the MetroPCS business combination, primarily in cost of services; partially offset by
•
Higher selling, general and administrative expenses primarily attributable to strategic investments to support our growing customer base, including higher employee-related costs, higher commissions driven by an increase in branded customer additions and higher promotional costs.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our principal sources of liquidity are our cash and cash equivalents and cash generated from operations, proceeds from issuance of long-term debt, capital leases, common and preferred stock, the sale of certain receivables, financing arrangements of vendor payables which effectively extend payment terms and an unsecured revolving credit facility with Deutsche Telekom.
Cash Flows
The following is an analysis of our year-to-date cash flows:
Nine Months Ended September 30,
Change
(in millions)
2016
2015
$
%
Net cash provided by operating activities
$
4,533
$
3,181
$
1,352
43
%
Net cash used in investing activities
(4,386
)
(5,238
)
852
16
%
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
623
(625
)
1,248
NM
NM – Not Meaningful
Operating Activities
Cash provided by operating activities
increased
$1.4 billion
, or
43%
, primarily due to the following:
•
$986 million
increase in net non-cash income and expenses included in net income primarily due to changes in
Depreciation and amortization
,
Gains on disposal of spectrum licenses
and
Deferred income tax expense
;
•
$634 million
increase in net income; partially offset by
•
$268 million
increase in net cash outflows from changes in working capital primarily due to changes in
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
,
Equipment installment plan receivables
, including inflows from the EIP sale arrangement funding increase and
Inventories
.
Investing Activities
Cash used in investing activities
decreased
$852 million
, or
16%
, to a use of
$4.4 billion
primarily due to the following:
•
$3.8 billion
for the purchase of property and equipment primarily related to the build out of our LTE network;
•
$3.5 billion
for the purchase of spectrum licenses and other intangible assets, including a
$2.2 billion
deposit made to a third party in connection with a potential asset purchase; partially offset by
•
$3.0 billion
in sales of short-term investments.
39
Table of Contents
Financing Activities
Cash provided by financing activities
increased
$1.2 billion
to inflow of
$623 million
primarily due to the following:
•
$997 million
from the issuance of long-term debt; partially offset by
•
$150 million
for repayments of short-term debt for purchases of inventory, property and equipment, net and
•
$133 million
for repayments of capital lease obligations.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
As of
September 30, 2016
, our cash and cash equivalents were
$5.4 billion
.
Free Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow represents net cash provided by operating activities less payments for purchases of property and equipment. Free Cash Flow is a non-GAAP financial measure utilized by our management, investors and analysts of T-Mobile’s financial information to evaluate cash available to pay debt and provide further investment in the business.
The following table illustrates the calculation of Free Cash Flow and reconciles Free Cash Flow to Net cash provided by operating activities, which we consider to be the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure:
Three Months Ended September 30,
Change
Nine Months Ended September 30,
Change
(in millions)
2016
2015
$
%
2016
2015
$
%
Net cash provided by operating activities
$
1,740
$
1,531
$
209
14
%
$
4,533
$
3,181
$
1,352
43
%
Cash purchases of property and equipment
(1,159
)
(1,120
)
(39
)
3
%
(3,843
)
(3,293
)
(550
)
17
%
Free Cash Flow
$
581
$
411
$
170
41
%
$
690
$
(112
)
$
802
716
%
Free Cash Flow
increased
$170 million
for the
three months ended
and
$802 million
for the
nine months ended
September 30, 2016
, compared to the same periods in
2015
. These
increases
were primarily due to higher net cash provided by operating activities, partially offset by higher purchases of property and equipment from the build-out of our LTE network, as described above.
Debt
As of
September 30, 2016
, our total debt was
$27.8 billion
, excluding our tower obligations, of which
$27.4 billion
was classified as long-term debt. Significant debt-related activity during 2016 included:
•
In March
2016
, T-Mobile USA, Inc. (“T-Mobile USA”), a subsidiary of T-Mobile US, Inc., and certain of its affiliates, as guarantors, entered into a purchase agreement with Deutsche Telekom AG (“Deutsche Telekom”), our majority stockholder, under which T-Mobile USA may, at its option, issue and sell to Deutsche Telekom
$2.0 billion
of
5.300%
Senior Notes due 2021 (the “
5.300%
Senior Notes”) for an aggregate purchase price of
$2.0 billion
. If T-Mobile USA does not elect to issue the
5.300%
Senior Notes on or prior to November 30, 2016, the commitment under the purchase agreement terminates and T-Mobile USA must reimburse Deutsche Telekom for the cost of its hedging arrangements (if any) related to the transaction.
•
In April
2016
, T-Mobile USA issued
$1.0 billion
of public
6.000%
Senior Notes due
2024
.
•
In April
2016
, T-Mobile USA entered into a purchase agreement with Deutsche Telekom, under which T-Mobile USA may, at its option, issue and sell to Deutsche Telekom up to
$1.35 billion
of
6.000%
Senior Notes due
2024
and (iii) entered into another purchase agreement with Deutsche Telekom, under which T-Mobile USA may, at its option, issue and sell to Deutsche Telekom up to an additional
$650 million
of
6.000%
Senior Notes due
2024
.
•
The purchase price for the
6.000%
Senior Notes that may be issued under the
$1.35 billion
purchase agreement will be approximately
103.316%
of the outstanding principal balance of the notes issued. If T-Mobile USA does not elect to issue the
6.000%
Senior Notes under the
$1.35 billion
purchase agreement on or prior to November 5, 2016 or elects to issue less than
$1.35 billion
of
6.000%
Senior Notes, any unused portion of the commitment under the purchase
40
Table of Contents
agreement terminates and T-Mobile USA must reimburse Deutsche Telekom for the cost of its hedging arrangements (if any) related to the transaction.
•
In April
2016
, T-Mobile USA entered into another purchase agreement with Deutsche Telekom, in which T-Mobile USA may, at its option, issue and sell to Deutsche Telekom up to an additional
$650 million
of
6.000%
Senior Notes due 2024. The purchase price for the
6.000%
Senior Notes that may be issued under the
$650 million
purchase agreement will be approximately
104.047%
of the outstanding principal balance of the notes issued. If T-Mobile USA does not elect to issue the
6.000%
Senior Notes under the
$650 million
purchase agreement on or prior to November 5, 2016 or elects to issue less than
$650 million
Senior Notes, any unused portion of the commitment under the purchase agreement terminates and T-Mobile USA must reimburse Deutsche Telekom for the cost of its hedging arrangements (if any) related to the transaction.
•
We have entered into uncommitted capital lease facilities with certain partners, which provide us with the ability to enter into capital leases for network equipment and services. As of
September 30, 2016
, we have committed to
$1.1 billion
of capital leases under these capital lease facilities, of which
$679 million
was executed during the
nine months ended September 30, 2016
. We expect to enter into up to an additional
$121 million
in capital lease commitments during
2016
.
•
As of
September 30, 2016
, there was no outstanding balance on our unsecured revolving credit facility with Deutsche Telekom that allows for up to
$500 million
in borrowings.
See
Note 2 – Significant Transactions
of the
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
for additional details.
We could seek additional sources of liquidity, including through the issuance of additional long-term debt in 2016, to continue to opportunistically acquire spectrum licenses in private party transactions and future FCC spectrum license auctions, including the broadcast incentive auction in 2016, or for the refinancing of existing long-term debt on an opportunistic basis. Excluding any additional liquidity needed to acquire spectrum, we expect our principal sources of funding to be sufficient to meet our anticipated liquidity requirements in the next 12 months and intend to use our principal sources of funding for general corporate purposes, including capital investments other than spectrum licenses, and enhancing our financial flexibility.
We determine future liquidity requirements, for both operations and capital expenditures, based in large part upon projected financial and operating performance, and opportunities to acquire additional spectrum. We regularly review and update these projections for changes in current and projected financial and operating results, general economic conditions, the competitive landscape and other factors. There are a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause our financial and operating results and capital requirements to differ materially from our projections, which could cause future liquidity to differ materially from our assessment.
The indentures and credit facilities governing our long-term debt to affiliates and third parties, excluding capital leases, contain covenants that, among other things, limit the ability of the Issuer and the Guarantor Subsidiaries to: incur more debt; pay dividends and make distributions on our common stock; make certain investments; repurchase stock; create liens or other encumbrances; enter into transactions with affiliates; enter into transactions that restrict dividends or distributions from subsidiaries; and merge, consolidate, or sell, or otherwise dispose of, substantially all of their assets. Certain provisions of each of the credit facilities, indentures and supplemental indentures relating to the long-term debt to affiliates and third parties restrict the ability of the Issuer to loan funds or make payments to the Parent. However, the Issuer is allowed to make certain permitted payments to the Parent under the terms of each of the credit facilities, indentures and supplemental indentures relating to the long-term debt to affiliates and third parties. We were in compliance with all restrictive debt covenants as of
September 30, 2016
.
Capital Expenditures
Our liquidity requirements have been driven primarily by capital expenditures for spectrum licenses and the construction, expansion and upgrading of our network infrastructure. Property and equipment capital expenditures primarily relate to our network modernization, including the build out of LTE 700 MHz A-Block spectrum licenses. We expect cash capital expenditures for property and equipment to be in the range of
$4.5 billion
to
$4.7 billion
in
2016
. This does not include property and equipment obtained through capital lease agreements, leased wireless devices transferred from inventory or purchases of spectrum licenses.
41
Table of Contents
Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations and borrowings as of
September 30, 2016
and the timing and effect that such commitments are expected to have on our liquidity and capital requirements in future periods:
(in millions)
Less Than 1 Year
1 - 3 Years
4 - 5 Years
More Than 5 Years
Total
Long-term debt
(1)
$
20
$
3,040
$
7,790
$
15,335
$
26,185
Interest on long-term debt
1,681
3,310
2,746
2,110
9,847
Capital lease obligations, including interest
361
638
350
227
1,576
Tower obligations
(2)
181
363
365
1,193
2,102
Operating leases
2,429
4,310
3,477
5,345
15,561
Purchase obligations
(3)
3,360
1,814
1,346
1,116
7,636
Network decommissioning
(4)
117
191
89
55
452
Total contractual obligations
$
8,149
$
13,666
$
16,163
$
25,381
$
63,359
(1)
Represents principal amounts of long-term debt to affiliates and third parties at maturity, excluding unamortized premium from purchase price allocation fair value adjustment, capital lease obligations and vendor financing arrangements.
(2)
Future minimum payments, including principal and interest payments and imputed lease rental income, related to the tower obligations.
(3)
T-Mobile calculated the minimum obligation for certain agreements to purchase goods or services based on termination fees that can be paid to exit the contract. Termination penalties are included in the above table as payments due in less than one year, as this is the earliest T-Mobile could exit these contracts. For certain contracts that include fixed volume purchase commitments and fixed prices for various products, the purchase obligations are calculated using fixed volumes and contractually fixed prices for the products that are expected to be purchased. This table does not include open purchase orders as of
September 30, 2016
under normal business purposes.
(4)
Represents future undiscounted cash flows related to decommissioned MetroPCS CDMA network and certain other redundant cell sites as of
September 30, 2016
.
Certain commitments and obligations are included in the table based on the year of required payment or an estimate of the year of payment. Other long-term liabilities, excluding network decommissioning, have been omitted from the table above due to the uncertainty of the timing of payments, combined with the absence of historical trending to be used as a predictor of such payments. In addition, because dividends on preferred stock are subject to approval by our Board of Directors, amounts are not included in the preceding table unless such authorization has occurred and the dividend has not been paid.
The purchase obligations reflected in the table above are primarily commitments to purchase handsets and accessories, equipment, software, programming and network services, and marketing activities, which will be used or sold in the ordinary course of business. These amounts do not represent T-Mobile’s entire anticipated purchases in the future, but represent only those items for which T-Mobile is contractually committed. Where T-Mobile is committed to make a minimum payment to the supplier regardless of whether it takes delivery, T-Mobile has included only that minimum payment as a purchase obligation. Additionally, included within purchase obligations are amounts for the acquisition of spectrum licenses, which are subject to regulatory approval and other customary closing conditions.
Spectrum License Agreement
In May
2016
, we entered into an agreement with a third party for the purchase of certain spectrum licenses covering approximately
11 million
people for approximately
$420 million
. The transaction is expected to close in the fourth quarter of 2016, subject to regulatory approval and other customary closing conditions.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
In 2015, we entered into an arrangement, as amended, to sell certain EIP accounts receivable on a revolving basis through November 2017 as an additional source of liquidity. In June 2016, the arrangement was amended to increase the maximum funding commitment to
$1.3 billion
with a scheduled expiration date in
November 2017
. In 2014, we entered into an arrangement, as amended, to sell certain service accounts receivable on a revolving basis through
March 2017
as an additional source of liquidity. As of
September 30, 2016
, T-Mobile derecognized net receivables of
$2.4 billion
upon sale through these arrangements. See
Note 3 – Sales of Certain Receivables
of the
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
.
42
Table of Contents
Related-Party Transactions
In March
2016
, T-Mobile USA entered into a purchase agreement with Deutsche Telekom under which T-Mobile USA may, at its option, issue and sell to Deutsche Telekom
$2.0 billion
of
5.300%
Senior Notes due 2021 for an aggregate purchase price of
$2.0 billion
.
In April
2016
, T-Mobile USA entered into a purchase agreement with Deutsche Telekom under which T-Mobile USA may, at its option, issue and sell to Deutsche Telekom up to
$1.35 billion
of
6.000%
Senior Notes due
2024
. The purchase price for the
6.000%
Senior Notes that may be issued under the
$1.35 billion
purchase agreement will be approximately
103.316%
of the outstanding principal balance of the notes issued.
In April
2016
, T-Mobile USA entered into a purchase agreement with Deutsche Telekom under which T-Mobile USA may, at its option, issue and sell to Deutsche Telekom up to
$650 million
of
6.000%
Senior Notes due
2024
. The purchase price for the 6.000% Senior Notes that may be issued under the
$650 million
purchase agreement will be approximately
104.047%
of the outstanding principal balance of the notes issued.
See
Note 2 – Significant Transactions
of the
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
.
Disclosure of Iranian Activities under Section 13(r) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Section 219 of the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012 added Section 13(r) to the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”). Section 13(r) requires an issuer to disclose in its annual or quarterly reports, as applicable, whether it or any of its affiliates knowingly engaged in certain activities, transactions or dealings relating to Iran or with designated natural persons or entities involved in terrorism or the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. Disclosure is required even where the activities, transactions or dealings are conducted outside the U.S. by non-U.S. affiliates in compliance with applicable law, and whether or not the activities are sanctionable under U.S. law.
As of the date of this report, we are not aware of any activity, transaction or dealing by us or any of our affiliates for the
three months ended
September 30, 2016
that requires disclosure in this report under Section 13(r) of the Exchange Act, except as set forth below with respect to affiliates that we do not control and that are our affiliates solely due to their common control with Deutsche Telekom. We have relied upon Deutsche Telekom for information regarding their activities, transactions and dealings.
Deutsche Telekom, through certain of its non-U.S. subsidiaries, is party to roaming and interconnect agreements with the following mobile and fixed line telecommunication providers in Iran, some of which are or may be government-controlled entities: Gostaresh Ertebatat Taliya, Irancell Telecommunications Services Company (“MTN Irancell”), Telecommunication Kish Company, Mobile Telecommunication Company of Iran, and Telecommunication Infrastructure Company of Iran. For the
three months ended
September 30, 2016
, gross revenues of all Deutsche Telekom affiliates generated by roaming and interconnection traffic with Iran were less than
$1.0 million
and estimated net profits were less than
$1.0 million
.
In addition, Deutsche Telekom, through certain of its non-U.S. subsidiaries, operating a fixed line network in their respective European home countries (in particular Germany), provides telecommunications services in the ordinary course of business to the Embassy of Iran in those European countries. Gross revenues and net profits recorded from these activities for the
three months ended
September 30, 2016
were less than
$0.1 million
. We understand that Deutsche Telekom intends to continue these activities.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Preparation of our consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of certain assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, as well as related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. There have been no material changes to the critical accounting policies and estimates as previously disclosed in Part II, Item 8 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
See
Note 1 – Basis of Presentation
of the
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
.
43
Table of Contents
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
There have been no material changes to the interest rate risk as previously disclosed in Part II, Item 7A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure information required to be disclosed in our periodic reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Our disclosure controls are also designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, we carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective, as of the end of the period covered by this report.
The certifications required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 are filed as Exhibits
31.1
and
31.2
, respectively, to this
Form 10-Q
.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act, during our most recently completed fiscal quarter that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
See
Note 7 – Commitments and Contingencies
of the
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes in our risk factors as previously disclosed in Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
None.
Item 5. Other Information
None.
44
Table of Contents
Item 6. Exhibits
Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit No.
Exhibit Description
Form
Date of First Filing
Exhibit Number
Filed Herein
4.1
Eleventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 30, 2016, by and among T-Mobile USA, Inc., the other guarantors party thereto, and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee.
X
4.2
Eighth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 30, 2016, by and among T-Mobile USA, Inc., the other guarantors party thereto, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee.
X
4.3
Twenty-Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 30, 2016, by and among T-Mobile USA, Inc., T-Mobile US, Inc., the other guarantors party thereto and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee.
X
10.1
First Amendment, dated as of July 27, 2016, to the Amended and Restated Receivables Purchase and Administration Agreement, dated as of June 6, 2016, by and among T-Mobile Handset Funding LLC, as transferor, T-Mobile Financial LLC, as servicer, T-Mobile US, Inc., as performance guarantor, Royal Bank of Canada, as administrative agent, and certain financial institutions party thereto.
X
31.1
Certifications of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
X
31.2
Certifications of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
X
32.1*
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2*
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.INS
XBRL Instance Document.
X
101.SCH
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
X
101.CAL
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
X
101.DEF
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
X
101.LAB
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
X
101.PRE
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.
X
*
Furnished herein.
45
Table of Contents
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
T-MOBILE US, INC.
October 24, 2016
/s/ J. Braxton Carter
J. Braxton Carter
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
46