Tri Pointe Homes - 10-Q quarterly report FY2017 Q2

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

FORM 10-Q

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

(Mark One)



☒	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2017



☐	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number 1-35796

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

TRI Pointe Group, Inc.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

_____________________________________________________________________________________________



Delaware		61-1763235
(State or other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

19540 Jamboree Road, Suite 300

Irvine, California 92612

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (949) 438-1400

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.



Large accelerated filer	☒	Accelerated filer	☐
Non-accelerated filer	☐ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company	☐
		Emerging Growth Company	☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

151,338,386 shares of common stock were issued and outstanding as of July 17, 2017.

- 1 -

EXPLANATORY NOTE

As used in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, references to “TRI Pointe”, “the Company”, “we”, “us”, or “our” (including in the consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto in this report) refer to TRI Pointe Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“TRI Pointe Group”) and its subsidiaries.

- 2 -

TRI POINTE GROUP, INC.

FORM 10-Q

INDEX

June 30, 2017



		Page Number
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Financial Statements	3

	Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2017 (unaudited) and December 31, 2016	3

	Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 (unaudited)	4

	Consolidated Statements of Equity for the Year Ended December 31, 2016 and the Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 (unaudited)	5

	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 (unaudited)	6

	Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)	7

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	35

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	57

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	57

Part II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	58

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	58

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	58

Item 6.	Exhibits	59

SIGNATURES		60

- 2 -

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION


Item 1.	Financial Statements

TRI POINTE GROUP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except share amounts)



	June 30, 2017		December 31, 2016
	(unaudited)
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	114,945	$	208,657
Receivables	73,003		82,500
Real estate inventories	3,208,341		2,910,627
Investments in unconsolidated entities	18,787		17,546
Goodwill and other intangible assets, net	161,228		161,495
Deferred tax assets, net	117,582		123,223
Other assets	58,111		60,592
Total assets	$	3,751,997	$	3,564,640
Liabilities
Accounts payable	$	63,251	$	70,252
Accrued expenses and other liabilities	278,017		263,845
Unsecured revolving credit facility	150,000		200,000
Seller financed loan	—		13,726
Senior notes, net	1,467,861		1,168,307
Total liabilities	1,959,129		1,716,130

Commitments and contingencies (Note 13)

Equity
Stockholders’ Equity:
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively	—		—
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized; 151,320,521 and 158,626,229 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively	1,513		1,586
Additional paid-in capital	788,495		880,822
Retained earnings	987,946		947,039
Total stockholders’ equity	1,777,954		1,829,447
Noncontrolling interests	14,914		19,063
Total equity	1,792,868		1,848,510
Total liabilities and equity	$	3,751,997	$	3,564,640

See accompanying condensed notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

- 3 -

TRI POINTE GROUP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(unaudited)

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)



	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016			2017			2016
Homebuilding:
Home sales revenue	$	568,816		$	556,925		$	960,820		$	979,980
Land and lot sales revenue	865			67,314			1,443			67,669
Other operations revenue	600			604			1,168			1,184
Total revenues	570,281			624,843			963,431			1,048,833
Cost of home sales	454,241			432,738			772,645			757,237
Cost of land and lot sales	644			14,460			1,298			15,239
Other operations expense	591			583			1,151			1,149
Sales and marketing	32,330			32,448			59,030			58,769
General and administrative	33,688			30,484			68,337			59,015
Homebuilding income from operations	48,787			114,130			60,970			157,424
Equity in income of unconsolidated entities	1,508			215			1,646			201
Other income, net	44			151			121			266
Homebuilding income before income taxes	50,339			114,496			62,737			157,891
Financial Services:
Revenues	345			379			586			527
Expenses	77			53			151			111
Equity in income of unconsolidated entities	1,294			1,284			1,560			1,999
Financial services income before income taxes	1,562			1,610			1,995			2,415
Income before income taxes	51,901			116,106			64,732			160,306
Provision for income taxes	(19,098		)	(41,913		)	(23,712		)	(57,403		)
Net income	32,803			74,193			41,020			102,903
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests	(89		)	(267		)	(113		)	(427		)
Net income available to common stockholders	$	32,714		$	73,926		$	40,907		$	102,476
Earnings per share
Basic	$	0.21		$	0.46		$	0.26		$	0.63
Diluted	$	0.21		$	0.46		$	0.26		$	0.63
Weighted average shares outstanding
Basic	155,603,699			161,826,275			157,335,296			161,882,378
Diluted	156,140,543			162,259,283			157,924,561			162,245,399

See accompanying condensed notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

- 4 -

TRI POINTE GROUP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY

(unaudited)

(in thousands, except share amounts)



	Number of Shares of Common Stock (Note 1)		Common Stock			Additional Paid-in Capital			Retained Earnings		Total Stockholders' Equity			Noncontrolling Interests			Total Equity
Balance at December 31, 2015	161,813,750		$	1,618		$	911,197		$	751,868	$	1,664,683		$	21,780		$	1,686,463
Net income	—		—			—			195,171		195,171			962			196,133
Shares issued under share-based awards	373,332		4			583			—		587			—			587
Excess tax deficit of share-based awards, net	—		—			(165		)	—		(165		)	—			(165		)
Minimum tax withholding paid on behalf of employees for restricted stock units	—		—			(1,359		)	—		(1,359		)	—			(1,359		)
Stock-based compensation expense	—		—			12,612			—		12,612			—			12,612
Share repurchases	(3,560,853	)	(36		)	(42,046		)	—		(42,082		)	—			(42,082		)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests, net	—		—			—			—		—			(3,363		)	(3,363		)
Net effect of consolidations, de-consolidations and other transactions	—		—			—			—		—			(316		)	(316		)
Balance at December 31, 2016	158,626,229		1,586			880,822			947,039		1,829,447			19,063			1,848,510
Net income	—		—			—			40,907		40,907			113			41,020
Shares issued under share-based awards	713,297		7			2,442			—		2,449			—			2,449
Minimum tax withholding paid on behalf of employees for restricted stock units	—		—			(2,896		)	—		(2,896		)	—			(2,896		)
Stock-based compensation expense	—		—			7,744			—		7,744			—			7,744
Share repurchases	(8,019,005	)	(80		)	(99,617		)	—		(99,697		)	—			(99,697		)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests, net	—		—			—			—		—			(987		)	(987		)
Net effect of consolidations, de-consolidations and other transactions	—		—			—			—		—			(3,275		)	(3,275		)
Balance at June 30, 2017	151,320,521		$	1,513		$	788,495		$	987,946	$	1,777,954		$	14,914		$	1,792,868

See accompanying condensed notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

- 5 -

TRI POINTE GROUP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(unaudited)

(in thousands)



	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	41,020		$	102,903
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	1,698			1,457
Equity in income of unconsolidated entities, net	(3,206		)	(2,200		)
Deferred income taxes, net	5,641			13,957
Amortization of stock-based compensation	7,744			6,363
Charges for impairments and lot option abandonments	828			289
Excess tax deficit of share-based awards	—			(182		)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Real estate inventories	(298,007		)	(323,305		)
Receivables	9,717			9,199
Other assets	4,638			1,599
Accounts payable	(7,001		)	14,978
Accrued expenses and other liabilities	14,171			(14,871		)
Returns on investments in unconsolidated entities, net	2,057			3,617
Net cash used in operating activities	(220,700		)	(186,196		)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of property and equipment	(1,793		)	(1,123		)
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment	6			—
Investments in unconsolidated entities	(462		)	(32		)
Net cash used in investing activities	(2,249		)	(1,155		)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Borrowings from debt	450,000			392,758
Repayment of debt	(213,726		)	(276,826		)
Debt issuance costs	(5,906		)	(5,110		)
Net repayments of debt held by variable interest entities	—			(2,297		)
Contributions from noncontrolling interests	—			1,810
Distributions to noncontrolling interests	(987		)	(3,921		)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock under share-based awards	2,449			18
Minimum tax withholding paid on behalf of employees for share-based awards	(2,896		)	(1,359		)
Share repurchases	(99,697		)	(14,698		)
Net cash provided by financing activities	129,237			90,375
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	(93,712		)	(96,976		)
Cash and cash equivalents - beginning of period	208,657			214,485
Cash and cash equivalents - end of period	$	114,945		$	117,509

See accompanying condensed notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

- 6 -

TRI POINTE GROUP, INC.

CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited)


1.	Organization, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Organization

TRI Pointe Group is engaged in the design, construction and sale of innovative single-family attached and detached homes through its portfolio of six quality brands across eight states, including Maracay Homes in Arizona, Pardee Homes in California and Nevada, Quadrant Homes in Washington, Trendmaker Homes in Texas, TRI Pointe Homes in California and Colorado and Winchester Homes in Maryland and Virginia.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), as contained within the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”), for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. They should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016. In the opinion of management, all adjustments consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation with respect to interim financial statements, have been included. The results for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year due to seasonal variations and other factors.

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of TRI Pointe Group and its wholly owned subsidiaries, as well as other entities in which TRI Pointe Group has a controlling interest and variable interest entities (“VIEs”) in which TRI Pointe Group is the primary beneficiary. The noncontrolling interests as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 represent the outside owners’ interests in the Company’s consolidated entities and the net equity of the VIE owners. All significant intercompany accounts have been eliminated upon consolidation.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of our financial statements requires our management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosures of contingent liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from our estimates.

Reclassifications

Certain amounts in our consolidated financial statements for the prior year periods have been reclassified to conform to the presentation of the current year periods, including the Company's reclassification of restructuring charges, which was presented as a separate line item on the consolidated statement of operations in the prior year, and has been reclassified to general and administrative expense for both the current and prior years. This reclassification had no material impact on the Company's condensed consolidated financial statements.

- 7 -

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASU 2014-09”). The core principle of ASU 2014-09 is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. To achieve that core principle, an entity should apply the following steps: identify the contract(s) with a customer; identify the performance obligations in the contract; determine the transaction price; allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. ASU 2014-09 supersedes the revenue-recognition requirements in ASC Topic 605, Revenue Recognition, most industry-specific guidance throughout the industry topics of the accounting standards codification, and some cost guidance related to construction-type and production-type contracts. On July 9, 2015, the FASB voted to defer the effective date of ASU No. 2014-09 by one year and it is now effective for public entities for the annual periods ending after December 15, 2017, and for annual and interim periods thereafter. Companies may use either a full retrospective or a modified retrospective approach to adopt ASU 2014-09, and we expect to adopt the new standard under the modified retrospective approach. The Company's assessment efforts to date have included reviewing current accounting policies and processes, as well as assigning internal resources to assist in the process. Additionally, the Company has begun to review historical contracts and other arrangements to identify potential differences that could arise from the adoption of ASU 2014-09. We are still evaluating the accounting for marketing costs and it is possible that the adoption of ASU 2014-09 will impact the timing of recognition and classification in our consolidated financial statements of certain marketing costs that we incur to obtain sales contracts from our customers. For example, we currently capitalize and amortize various marketing costs with each home delivered in a community. Under the new guidance, these costs may need to be expensed when incurred. Although we are still evaluating our contracts, we do not believe the adoption of ASU 2014-09 will have a material impact on the amount or timing of our home sales revenue, but could impact the amount and timing of land and lot sales. We are continuing to evaluate the exact impact the new standard will have on recording revenue and our marketing costs in our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-02, (“ASU 2016-02”), Leases (Topic 842): Leases, which requires an entity to recognize assets and liabilities on the balance sheet for the rights and obligations created by leased assets and provide additional disclosures. ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2018, and, at that time, we will adopt the new standard using a modified retrospective approach. We are currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of ASU 2016-02 may have on our consolidated financial statements and disclosures.

In March 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-09, (“ASU 2016-09”), Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. On January 1, 2017, we adopted ASU 2016-09. This new guidance requires that we record excess tax benefit and tax deficiencies related to the settlement of employee stock-based compensation to the income tax expense line item on our consolidated statement of operations. We previously recorded the excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies to the additional paid-in capital line item on our consolidated balance sheets. Under the new guidance, the Company elected the option to no longer apply a forfeiture rate to our stock-based compensation expense, and to recognize forfeitures as they occur. The adoption of the aforementioned amendments in ASU 2016-09 were applied using the modified retrospective approach and did not have a material impact on our current or prior year financial statements, with no resulting cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings. The new guidance also requires excess tax benefits to be classified as an operating activity in the statement of cash flows rather than as a financing activity. Additionally, ASU 2016-09 requires that the minimum tax withholding paid on behalf of employees for share-based awards be classified as a financing activity in the statement of cash flows. Adoption of ASU 2016-09 did not result in any adjustments to prior period disclosures on the statement of cash flows.

In August 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-15, (“ASU 2016-15”), Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments, which provides guidance on how certain cash receipts and cash payments are to be presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-15 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact that adoption of ASU 2016-15 may have on our consolidated financial statements and disclosures, however we do not believe the guidance will have a material impact on our financial statements upon adoption.

- 8 -

In January 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2017-04, (“ASU 2017-04”), Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Accounting for Goodwill Impairment, which removes the requirement to perform a hypothetical purchase price allocation to measure goodwill impairment. A goodwill impairment will now be the amount by which a reporting unit’s carrying value exceeds its fair value, not to exceed the carrying amount of goodwill. ASU 2017-04 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted, and applied prospectively. We do not expect ASU 2017-04 to have a material impact on our financial statements.


2.	Segment Information

We operate two principal businesses: homebuilding and financial services.

Our homebuilding operations consist of six homebuilding brands that acquire and develop land and construct and sell single-family detached and attached homes. In accordance with ASC Topic 280, Segment Reporting, in determining the most appropriate reportable segments, we considered similar economic and other characteristics, including product types, average selling prices, gross profits, production processes, suppliers, subcontractors, regulatory environments, land acquisition results, and underlying demand and supply. Based upon the above factors, our homebuilding operations are comprised of the following six reportable segments: Maracay Homes, consisting of operations in Arizona; Pardee Homes, consisting of operations in California and Nevada; Quadrant Homes, consisting of operations in Washington; Trendmaker Homes, consisting of operations in Texas; TRI Pointe Homes, consisting of operations in California and Colorado; and Winchester Homes, consisting of operations in Maryland and Virginia.

Our financial services operation (“TRI Pointe Solutions”) is a reportable segment and is comprised of mortgage financing operations (“TRI Pointe Connect”) and title services operations (“TRI Pointe Assurance”). While our homebuyers may obtain financing from any mortgage provider of their choice, TRI Pointe Connect, which was formed as a joint venture with an established mortgage lender, can act as a preferred mortgage broker to our homebuyers in all of the markets in which we operate, providing mortgage originations that help facilitate the sale and closing process as well as generate additional fee income for us. TRI Pointe Assurance provides title examinations for our homebuyers in our Trendmaker Homes and Winchester Homes brands. TRI Pointe Assurance is a wholly owned subsidiary of TRI Pointe and acts as a title agency for First American Title Insurance Company.

Corporate is a non-operating segment that develops and implements company-wide strategic initiatives and provides support to our homebuilding reporting segments by centralizing certain administrative functions, such as marketing, legal, accounting, treasury, insurance, internal audit and risk management, information technology and human resources, to benefit from economies of scale. Our Corporate non-operating segment also includes general and administrative expenses related to operating our corporate headquarters. A portion of the expenses incurred by Corporate is allocated to the homebuilding reporting segments.

The reportable segments follow the same accounting policies as our consolidated financial statements described in Note 1, Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies. Operational results of each reportable segment are not necessarily indicative of the results that would have been achieved had the reportable segment been an independent, stand-alone entity during the periods presented.

- 9 -

Total revenues and income before income taxes for each of our reportable segments were as follows (in thousands):



	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016			2017			2016
Revenues
Maracay Homes	$	75,754		$	47,857		$	126,814		$	93,294
Pardee Homes	180,377			240,230			264,076			359,163
Quadrant Homes	40,266			59,163			80,818			105,221
Trendmaker Homes	65,466			64,472			117,828			108,258
TRI Pointe Homes	154,213			152,827			285,049			284,784
Winchester Homes	54,205			60,294			88,846			98,113
Total homebuilding revenues	570,281			624,843			963,431			1,048,833
Financial services	345			379			586			527
Total	$	570,626		$	625,222		$	964,017		$	1,049,360

Income (loss) before income taxes
Maracay Homes	$	6,241		$	2,523		$	7,998		$	5,159
Pardee Homes	36,270			96,079			46,163			128,210
Quadrant Homes	3,109			5,615			6,853			9,311
Trendmaker Homes	4,542			3,865			6,424			5,923
TRI Pointe Homes	8,958			12,213			15,397			22,928
Winchester Homes	2,219			3,992			2,619			4,653
Corporate	(11,000		)	(9,791		)	(22,717		)	(18,293		)
Total homebuilding income before income taxes	50,339			114,496			62,737			157,891
Financial services	1,562			1,610			1,995			2,415
Total	$	51,901		$	116,106		$	64,732		$	160,306

- 10 -

Total real estate inventories and total assets for each of our reportable segments, as of the date indicated, were as follows (in thousands):



	June 30, 2017		December 31, 2016
Real estate inventories
Maracay Homes	$	257,404	$	228,965
Pardee Homes	1,246,576		1,098,608
Quadrant Homes	270,416		221,386
Trendmaker Homes	212,917		211,035
TRI Pointe Homes	922,893		868,088
Winchester Homes	298,135		282,545
Total	$	3,208,341	$	2,910,627

Total assets
Maracay Homes	$	278,566	$	255,466
Pardee Homes	1,353,869		1,201,302
Quadrant Homes	286,542		242,208
Trendmaker Homes	227,390		225,025
TRI Pointe Homes	1,089,350		1,052,400
Winchester Homes	324,998		305,379
Corporate	182,680		275,923
Total homebuilding assets	3,743,395		3,557,703
Financial services	8,602		6,937
Total	$	3,751,997	$	3,564,640


3.	Earnings Per Share

The following table sets forth the components used in the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share (in thousands, except share and per share amounts):



	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017		2016		2017		2016
Numerator:
Net income available to common stockholders	$	32,714	$	73,926	$	40,907	$	102,476
Denominator:
Basic weighted-average shares outstanding	155,603,699		161,826,275		157,335,296		161,882,378
Effect of dilutive shares:
Stock options and unvested restricted stock units	536,844		433,008		589,265		363,021
Diluted weighted-average shares outstanding	156,140,543		162,259,283		157,924,561		162,245,399
Earnings per share
Basic	$	0.21	$	0.46	$	0.26	$	0.63
Diluted	$	0.21	$	0.46	$	0.26	$	0.63
Antidilutive stock options and unvested restricted stock not included in diluted earnings per share	3,889,923		5,929,877		3,862,763		5,123,183

- 11 -


4.	Receivables

Receivables consisted of the following (in thousands):



	June 30, 2017		December 31, 2016
Escrow proceeds and other accounts receivable, net	$	26,736	$	35,625
Warranty insurance receivable (Note 13)	46,267		46,875
Total receivables	$	73,003	$	82,500

Receivables are evaluated for collectability and allowances for potential losses are established or maintained on applicable receivables when collection becomes doubtful. Receivables were net of allowances for doubtful accounts of $286,000 as of both June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.


5.	Real Estate Inventories

Real estate inventories consisted of the following (in thousands):



	June 30, 2017		December 31, 2016
Real estate inventories owned:
Homes completed or under construction	$	1,039,687	$	659,210
Land under development	1,796,335		1,824,989
Land held for future development	135,695		226,915
Model homes	188,493		155,039
Total real estate inventories owned	3,160,210		2,866,153
Real estate inventories not owned:
Land purchase and land option deposits	33,231		26,174
Consolidated inventory held by VIEs	14,900		18,300
Total real estate inventories not owned	48,131		44,474
Total real estate inventories	$	3,208,341	$	2,910,627

Homes completed or under construction is comprised of costs associated with homes in various stages of construction and includes direct construction and related land acquisition and land development costs. Land under development primarily consists of land acquisition and land development costs, which include capitalized interest and real estate taxes, associated with land undergoing improvement activity. Land held for future development principally reflects land acquisition and land development costs related to land where development activity has not yet begun or has been suspended, but is expected to occur in the future.

Real estate inventories not owned represents deposits related to land purchase and land and lot option agreements as well as consolidated inventory held by variable interest entities. For further details, see Note 7, Variable Interest Entities.

During the quarter ended June 30, 2016, our Pardee Homes reporting segment sold two parcels, totaling 102 homebuilding lots, located in the Pacific Highlands Ranch community in San Diego, California. The land sold in this sale was classified as land under development and represented $61.6 million of land and lot sales revenue in the consolidated statements of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016.

- 12 -

Interest incurred, capitalized and expensed were as follows (in thousands):



	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016			2017			2016
Interest incurred	$	19,931		$	16,280		$	38,804		$	31,429
Interest capitalized	(19,931		)	(16,280		)	(38,804		)	(31,429		)
Interest expensed	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—
Capitalized interest in beginning inventory	$	166,515		$	146,630		$	157,329		$	140,311
Interest capitalized as a cost of inventory	19,931			16,280			38,804			31,429
Interest previously capitalized as a cost of inventory, included in cost of sales	(13,185		)	(11,563		)	(22,872		)	(20,393		)
Capitalized interest in ending inventory	$	173,261		$	151,347		$	173,261		$	151,347

Interest is capitalized to real estate inventory during development and other qualifying activities. Interest that is capitalized to real estate inventory is included in cost of home sales or cost of land and lot sales as related units or lots are delivered. Interest that is expensed as incurred is included in other income, net.

Real estate inventory impairments and land option abandonments

Real estate inventory impairments and land and lot option abandonments and pre-acquisition charges consisted of the following (in thousands):



	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017		2016		2017		2016
Real estate inventory impairments	$	234	$	—	$	267	$	—
Land and lot option abandonments and pre-acquisition charges	273		107		561		289
Total	$	507	$	107	$	828	$	289

Impairments of real estate inventory relate primarily to projects or communities that include homes completed or under construction. Within a project or community, there may be individual homes or parcels of land that are currently held for sale. Impairment charges recognized as a result of adjusting individual held-for-sale assets within a community to estimated fair value less cost to sell are also included in the total impairment charges.

In addition to owning land and residential lots, we also have option agreements to purchase land and lots at a future date. We have option deposits and capitalized pre-acquisition costs associated with the optioned land and lots. When the economics of a project no longer support acquisition of the land or lots under option, we may elect not to move forward with the acquisition. Option deposits and capitalized pre-acquisition costs associated with the assets under option may be forfeited at that time.

Real estate inventory impairments and land option abandonments are recorded in cost of home sales and cost of land and lot sales on the consolidated statements of operations.


6.	Investments in Unconsolidated Entities

As of June 30, 2017, we held equity investments in five active homebuilding partnerships or limited liability companies and one financial services limited liability company. Our participation in these entities may be as a developer, a builder, or an investment partner. Our ownership percentage varies from 7% to 55%, depending on the investment, with no controlling interest held in any of these investments.

- 13 -

Investments Held

Our cumulative investment in entities accounted for on the equity method, including our share of earnings and losses, consisted of the following (in thousands):



	June 30, 2017		December 31, 2016
Limited liability company interests	$	15,604	$	14,327
General partnership interests	3,183		3,219
Total	$	18,787	$	17,546

Unconsolidated Financial Information

Aggregated assets, liabilities and operating results of the entities we account for as equity-method investments are provided below. Because our ownership interest in these entities varies, a direct relationship does not exist between the information presented below and the amounts that are reflected on our consolidated balance sheets as our investments in unconsolidated entities or on our consolidated statements of operations as equity in income of unconsolidated entities.

Assets and liabilities of unconsolidated entities (in thousands):



	June 30, 2017		December 31, 2016
Assets
Cash	$	11,674	$	9,796
Receivables	5,254		10,203
Real estate inventories	97,800		97,402
Other assets	944		1,087
Total assets	$	115,672	$	118,488
Liabilities and equity
Accounts payable and other liabilities	$	9,107	$	12,844
Company’s equity	18,787		17,546
Outside interests' equity	87,778		88,098
Total liabilities and equity	$	115,672	$	118,488

Results of operations from unconsolidated entities (in thousands):



	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016			2017			2016
Net sales	$	5,228		$	4,688		$	10,318		$	7,897
Other operating expense	(3,579		)	(3,004		)	(6,182		)	(5,154		)
Other income	22			1			24			2
Net income	$	1,671		$	1,685		$	4,160		$	2,745
Company’s equity in income of unconsolidated entities	$	2,802		$	1,499		$	3,206		$	2,200


7.	Variable Interest Entities

In the ordinary course of business, we enter into land and lot option agreements in order to procure land and residential lots for future development and the construction of homes. The use of such land and lot option agreements generally allows us to reduce the risks associated with direct land ownership and development, and reduces our capital and financial commitments. Pursuant to these land and lot option agreements, we generally provide a deposit to the seller as consideration for the right to purchase land at different times in the future, usually at predetermined prices. Such deposits are recorded as land purchase and land option deposits under real estate inventories not owned in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

We analyze each of our land and lot option agreements and other similar contracts under the provisions of ASC 810 Consolidation to determine whether the land seller is a VIE and, if so, whether we are the primary beneficiary. Although we do not have legal title to the underlying land, if we are determined to be the primary beneficiary of the VIE, we will consolidate the VIE in our financial statements and reflect its assets as real estate inventory not owned included in our real estate

- 14 -

inventories, its liabilities as debt (nonrecourse) held by VIEs in accrued expenses and other liabilities and the net equity of the VIE owners as noncontrolling interests on our consolidated balance sheets. In determining whether we are the primary beneficiary, we consider, among other things, whether we have the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance. Such activities would include, among other things, determining or limiting the scope or purpose of the VIE, selling or transferring property owned or controlled by the VIE, or arranging financing for the VIE.

Creditors of the entities with which we have land and lot option agreements have no recourse against us. The maximum exposure to loss under our land and lot option agreements is limited to non-refundable option deposits and any capitalized pre-acquisition costs. In some cases, we have also contracted to complete development work at a fixed cost on behalf of the land owner and budget shortfalls and savings will be borne by us.

The following provides a summary of our interests in land and lot option agreements (in thousands):



	June 30, 2017						December 31, 2016
	Deposits		Remaining Purchase Price		Consolidated Inventory Held by VIEs		Deposits		Remaining Purchase Price		Consolidated Inventory Held by VIEs
Consolidated VIEs	$	675	$	14,225	$	14,900	$	400	$	17,900	$	18,300
Unconsolidated VIEs	6,375		145,232		N/A		2,375		49,016		N/A
Other land option agreements	26,856		264,060		N/A		23,799		246,658		N/A
Total	$	33,906	$	423,517	$	14,900	$	26,574	$	313,574	$	18,300

Unconsolidated VIEs represent land option agreements that were not consolidated because we were not the primary beneficiary. Other land option agreements were not considered VIEs.

In addition to the deposits presented in the table above, our exposure to loss related to our land and lot option contracts consisted of capitalized pre-acquisition costs of $4.4 million and $3.6 million as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. These pre-acquisition costs were included in real estate inventories as land under development on our consolidated balance sheets.


8.	Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, $139.3 million of goodwill is included in goodwill and other intangible assets, net on each of the consolidated balance sheets. The Company's goodwill balance is included in the TRI Pointe Homes reporting segment in Note 2, Segment Information.

We have two intangible assets as of June 30, 2017, comprised of an existing trade name from the acquisition of Maracay Homes in 2006, which has a 20 year useful life, and a TRI Pointe Homes trade name resulting from the acquisition of Weyerhaeuser Real Estate Company (“WRECO”) in 2014, which has an indefinite useful life.

Goodwill and other intangible assets consisted of the following (in thousands):



	June 30, 2017							December 31, 2016
	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization			Net Carrying Amount		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization			Net Carrying Amount
Goodwill	$	139,304	$	—		$	139,304	$	139,304	$	—		$	139,304
Trade names	27,979		(6,055		)	21,924		27,979		(5,788		)	22,191
Total	$	167,283	$	(6,055	)	$	161,228	$	167,283	$	(5,788	)	$	161,495

The remaining useful life of our amortizing intangible asset related to the Maracay Homes trade name was 8.7 and 9.2 years as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. Amortization expense related to this intangible asset was $134,000 for each of the three month periods ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and $267,000 for each of the six month periods ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Amortization of this intangible was charged to sales and marketing expense. Our $17.3 million indefinite life intangible asset related to the TRI Pointe Homes trade name is not amortizing. All trade names are evaluated for impairment on an annual basis or more frequently if indicators of impairment exist.

- 15 -

Expected amortization of our intangible asset related to Maracay Homes for the remainder of 2017, the next four years and thereafter is (in thousands):



Remainder of 2017	$	267
2018	534
2019	534
2020	534
2021	534
Thereafter	2,221
Total	$	4,624


9.	Other Assets

Other assets consisted of the following (in thousands):



	June 30, 2017		December 31, 2016
Prepaid expenses	$	19,562	$	24,495
Refundable fees and other deposits	17,398		17,731
Development rights, held for future use or sale	2,569		2,569
Deferred loan costs - unsecured revolving credit facility	3,904		2,101
Operating properties and equipment, net	11,010		10,884
Income tax receivable	1,336		—
Other	2,332		2,812
Total	$	58,111	$	60,592


10.	Accrued Expenses and Other Liabilities

Accrued expenses and other liabilities consisted of the following (in thousands):



	June 30, 2017		December 31, 2016
Accrued payroll and related costs	$	22,461	$	33,761
Warranty reserves(Note 13)	80,128		83,135
Estimated cost for completion of real estate inventories	77,802		59,531
Customer deposits	27,625		13,437
Income tax liability to Weyerhaeuser (Note 16)	8,610		8,589
Accrued income taxes payable	9,116		1,200
Accrued interest	3,143		11,570
Other tax liability	35,073		34,961
Other	14,059		17,661
Total	$	278,017	$	263,845

- 16 -


11.	Senior Notes, Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility and Seller Financed Loans

Senior Notes

The Senior Notes consisted of the following (in thousands):



	June 30, 2017			December 31, 2016
4.375% Senior Notes due June 15, 2019	$	450,000		$	450,000
4.875% Senior Notes due July 1, 2021	300,000			300,000
5.875% Senior Notes due June 15, 2024	450,000			450,000
5.250% Senior Notes due June 1, 2027	300,000			—
Discount and deferred loan costs	(32,139		)	(31,693		)
Total	$	1,467,861		$	1,168,307

In June 2017, TRI Pointe Group issued $300 million aggregate principal amount of 5.250% Senior Notes due 2027 (the "2027 Notes") at 100.00% of their aggregate principal amount. Net proceeds of this issuance were $296.3 million, after debt issuance costs and discounts. The 2027 Notes mature on June 1, 2027 and interest is paid semiannually in arrears on June 1 and December 1 of each year until maturity, beginning on December 1, 2017.

In May 2016, TRI Pointe Group issued $300 million aggregate principal amount of 4.875% Senior Notes due 2021 (the "2021 Notes") at 99.44% of their aggregate principal amount. Net proceeds of this issuance were $293.9 million, after debt issuance costs and discounts. The 2021 Notes mature on July 1, 2021 and interest is paid semiannually in arrears on January 1 and July 1.

TRI Pointe Group and its 100% owned subsidiary TRI Pointe Homes, Inc. ("TRI Pointe Homes") are co-issuers of the 4.375% Senior Notes due 2019 (the "2019 Notes") and the 5.875% Senior Notes due 2024 (the "2024 Notes"). The 2019 Notes were issued at 98.89% of their aggregate principal amount and the 2024 Notes were issued at 98.15% of their aggregate principal amount. The net proceeds from the offering were $861.3 million, after debt issuance costs and discounts. The 2019 Notes and 2024 Notes mature on June 15, 2019 and June 15, 2024, respectively. Interest is payable semiannually in arrears on June 15 and December 15.

As of June 30, 2017, no principal has been paid on the 2019 Notes, 2021 Notes, 2024 Notes and 2027 Notes (together, the "Senior Notes"), and there was $22.3 million of capitalized debt financing costs, included in senior notes, net on our consolidated balance sheet, related to the Senior Notes that will amortize over the lives of the Senior Notes. Accrued interest related to the Senior Notes was $3.0 million and $10.7 million as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility

Unsecured revolving credit facility consisted of the following (in thousands):



	June 30, 2017		December 31, 2016
Unsecured revolving credit facility	$	150,000	$	200,000

On June 20, 2017, the Company modified its existing unsecured revolving credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) to extend the maturity date by two years to May 18, 2021, while decreasing the total commitments under the Credit Facility to $600 million from $625 million. In addition, the Credit Facility was modified to give the Company the option to make offers to the lenders to extend the maturity date of the facility in twelve-month increments, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions. The Credit Facility contains a sublimit of $75 million for letters of credit. The Company may borrow under the Credit Facility in the ordinary course of business to fund its operations, including its land acquisition, land development and homebuilding activities. Borrowings under the Credit Facility will be governed by, among other things, a borrowing base. Interest rates on borrowings under the Credit Facility will be based on either a daily Eurocurrency base rate or a Eurocurrency rate, in either case, plus a spread ranging from 1.25% to 2.00%, depending on the Company’s leverage ratio. As of June 30, 2017, the outstanding balance under the Credit Facility was $150.0 million with an interest rate of 2.97% per annum and there was $442.2 million of availability after considering the borrowing base provisions and outstanding letters of credit. As of June 30, 2017 there was $3.9 million of capitalized debt financing costs, included in other assets on our consolidated balance

- 17 -

sheet, related to the Credit Facility that will amortize over the life of the Credit Facility, maturing on May 18, 2021. Accrued interest related to the Credit Facility was $216,000 and $658,000 as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

At June 30, 2017 we had outstanding letters of credit of $7.8 million. These letters of credit were issued to secure various financial obligations. We believe it is not probable that any outstanding letters of credit will be drawn upon.

Seller Financed Loans

Seller financed loans consisted of the following (in thousands):



	June 30, 2017		December 31, 2016
Seller financed loans	$	—	$	13,726

Accrued interest on a seller financed loan outstanding as of December 31, 2016 was $519,000.

Interest Incurred

During the three month periods ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company incurred interest of $19.9 million and $16.3 million, respectively, related to all debt during the period. Included in interest incurred was amortization of deferred financing and Senior Note discount costs of $1.8 million and $1.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. During the six month periods ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company incurred interest of $38.8 million and $31.4 million, respectively, related to all debt during the period. Included in interest incurred was amortization of deferred financing and Senior Notes discount costs of $3.7 million and $2.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Accrued interest related to all outstanding debt at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 was $3.1 million and $11.6 million, respectively.

Covenant Requirements

The Senior Notes contain covenants that restrict our ability to, among other things, create liens or other encumbrances, enter into sale and leaseback transactions, or merge or sell all or substantially all of our assets. These limitations are subject to a number of qualifications and exceptions.

Under the Credit Facility, the Company is required to comply with certain financial covenants, including but not limited to (i) a minimum consolidated tangible net worth; (ii) a maximum total leverage ratio; and (iii) a minimum interest coverage ratio.

The Company was in compliance with all applicable financial covenants as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.


12.	Fair Value Disclosures

Fair Value Measurements

ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, defines “fair value” as the price that would be received for selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at measurement date and requires assets and liabilities carried at fair value to be classified and disclosed in the following three categories:


•	Level 1—Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets


•	Level 2—Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are inactive; and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets at measurement date


•	Level 3—Valuations derived from techniques where one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable in active markets at measurement date

- 18 -

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

A summary of assets and liabilities at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, related to our financial instruments, measured at fair value on a recurring basis, is set forth below (in thousands):



		June 30, 2017				December 31, 2016
	Hierarchy	Book Value		Fair Value		Book Value		Fair Value
Senior Notes ⁽¹⁾	Level 2	$	1,490,190	$	1,551,750	$	1,189,180	$	1,219,125
Unsecured revolving credit facility ⁽²⁾	Level 2	$	150,000	$	148,765	$	200,000	$	177,410
Seller financed loan ⁽³⁾	Level 2	$	—	$	—	$	13,726	$	13,189

__________


⁽¹⁾	The book value of the Senior Notes is net of discounts, excluding deferred loan costs of $22.3 million and $20.9 million as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. The estimated fair value of the Senior Notes at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 is based on quoted market prices.


⁽²⁾	The estimated fair value of the Credit Facility at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 is based on a treasury curve analysis.


⁽³⁾	The estimated fair value of the seller financed loan at December 31, 2016 is based on a treasury curve analysis.

At June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the carrying value of cash and cash equivalents and receivables approximated fair value.

Fair Value of Nonfinancial Assets

Nonfinancial assets include items such as real estate inventories and long-lived assets that are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis when events and circumstances indicating the carrying value is not recoverable. The following table presents impairment charges and the remaining net fair value for nonfinancial assets that were measured during the periods presented (in thousands):



	Six Months Ended June 30, 2017				Year Ended December 31, 2016
	Impairment Charge		Fair Value Net of Impairment		Impairment Charge		Fair Value Net of Impairment
Real estate inventories⁽¹⁾	$	267	$	1,574	$	—	$	—

__________

⁽¹⁾Fair value of real estate inventories, net of impairment charges represents only those assets whose carrying values were adjusted to fair value in the respective periods presented. The fair value of these real estate inventories impaired was determined based on an analysis of future undiscounted net cash flows. In the case of lots for sale, fair value was determined based on recent land and lot sales for similar assets.


13.	Commitments and Contingencies

Legal Matters

Lawsuits, claims and proceedings have been and may be instituted or asserted against us in the normal course of business, including actions brought on behalf of various classes of claimants. We are also subject to local, state and federal laws and regulations related to land development activities, house construction standards, sales practices, employment practices, environmental protection and financial services. As a result, we are subject to periodic examinations or inquiry by agencies administering these laws and regulations.

We record a reserve for potential legal claims and regulatory matters when they are probable of occurring and a potential loss is reasonably estimable. We accrue for these matters based on facts and circumstances specific to each matter and revise these estimates when necessary. In view of the inherent difficulty of predicting outcomes of legal claims and related contingencies, we generally cannot predict their ultimate resolution, related timing or eventual loss. Accordingly, it is possible that the ultimate outcome of any matter, if in excess of a related accrual or if no accrual was made, could be material to our financial statements. For matters as to which the Company believes a loss is probable and reasonably estimable, we had legal reserves of $100,000 and $225,000 as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

- 19 -

On April 3, 2017, Pardee Homes was named as a defendant in a lawsuit filed in San Diego County Superior Court by Scripps Health (“Scripps”) related to the April 1989 sale by Pardee Homes of real property located in Carmel Valley, California to Scripps pursuant to a purchase agreement dated December 18, 1987 (as amended, the “Purchase Agreement”). In March 2003, Scripps contacted Pardee Homes and alleged Pardee Homes had breached a covenant in the Purchase Agreement by failing to record a restriction against the development of the surrounding property then owned by Pardee Homes for medical office use. In November 2003, the parties entered into a tolling agreement, pursuant to which the parties agreed to toll any applicable statutes of limitation from November 3, 2003 until the expiration of the agreement. The tolling agreement did not revive any cause of action already time barred by a statute of limitation as of November 3, 2003. The tolling agreement was terminated as of February 21, 2017. Pardee Homes became an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of TRI Pointe on July 7, 2014 in connection with TRI Pointe’s acquisition of WRECO.

We intend to vigorously defend the action, and intend to continue challenging Scripps' claims. Although we cannot predict or determine the timing or final outcome of the lawsuit or the effect that any adverse findings or determinations may have on us, we believe Scripps has no actionable claims against Pardee Homes and that this dispute will not have a material impact on our business, liquidity, financial condition and results of operations. An unfavorable determination could result in the payment by us of monetary damages, which could be significant. The complaint does not indicate the amount of relief sought, and an estimate of possible loss or range of loss cannot presently be made with respect to this matter. No reserve with respect to this matter has been recorded on our consolidated financial statements.

Warranty

Warranty reserves are accrued as home deliveries occur. Our warranty reserves on homes delivered will vary based on product type and geographic area and also depending on state and local laws. The warranty reserve is included in accrued expenses and other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets and represents expected future costs based on our historical experience over previous years. Estimated warranty costs are charged to cost of home sales in the period in which the related home sales revenue is recognized.

We maintain general liability insurance designed to protect us against a portion of our risk of loss from warranty and construction defect-related claims. We also generally require our subcontractors and design professionals to indemnify us for liabilities arising from their work, subject to various limitations. However, such indemnity is significantly limited with respect to certain subcontractors that are added to our general liability insurance policy.

Our warranty reserve and related estimated insurance recoveries are based on actuarial analysis that uses our historical claim and expense data, as well as industry data to estimate these overall costs and related recoveries. Key assumptions used in developing these estimates include claim frequencies, severities and resolution patterns, which can occur over an extended period of time. These estimates are subject to variability due to the length of time between the delivery of a home to a homebuyer and when a warranty or construction defect claim is made, and the ultimate resolution of such claim; uncertainties regarding such claims relative to our markets and the types of product we build; and legal or regulatory actions and/or interpretations, among other factors. Due to the degree of judgment involved and the potential for variability in these underlying assumptions, our actual future costs could differ from those estimated. There can be no assurance that the terms and limitations of the limited warranty will be effective against claims made by homebuyers, that we will be able to renew our insurance coverage or renew it at reasonable rates, that we will not be liable for damages, cost of repairs, and/or the expense of litigation surrounding possible construction defects, soil subsidence or building related claims or that claims will not arise out of uninsurable events or circumstances not covered by insurance and not subject to effective indemnification agreements with certain subcontractors.

We also record expected recoveries from insurance carriers based on actual insurance claims made and actuarially determined amounts that depend on various factors, including the above-described reserve estimates, our insurance policy coverage limits for the applicable policy years and historical recovery rates. Because of the inherent uncertainty and variability in these assumptions, our actual insurance recoveries could differ significantly from amounts currently estimated. Outstanding warranty insurance receivables were $46.3 million and $46.9 million as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. Warranty insurance receivables are recorded in receivables on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.

- 20 -

Warranty reserve activity consisted of the following (in thousands):



	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016			2017			2016
Warranty reserves, beginning of period⁽¹⁾	$	80,953		$	45,419		$	83,135		$	45,948
Warranty reserves accrued	3,794			2,971			5,674			5,044
Adjustments to pre-existing reserves	699			260			621			260
Warranty expenditures	(5,318		)	(3,378		)	(9,302		)	(5,980		)
Warranty reserves, end of period	$	80,128		$	45,272		$	80,128		$	45,272

__________

⁽¹⁾

Included in the 2017 opening balance is approximately $38.0 million of additional warranty liabilities estimated to be covered by our insurance policies that were adjusted to present the warranty reserves and related estimated warranty insurance receivable on a gross basis at December 31, 2016. Of the $38.0 million, approximately $36.5 million related to prior year estimated warranty insurance recoveries.

Performance Bonds

We obtain surety bonds in the normal course of business to ensure completion of certain infrastructure improvements of our projects. As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company had outstanding surety bonds totaling $503.7 million and $449.6 million, respectively. The beneficiaries of the bonds are various municipalities.

- 21 -


14.	Stock-Based Compensation

2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan

The Company’s stock compensation plan, the 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2013 Incentive Plan”), was adopted by TRI Pointe in January 2013 and amended, with the approval of our stockholders, in 2014 and 2015. In addition, our board of directors amended the 2013 Incentive Plan in 2014 to prohibit repricing (other than in connection with any equity restructuring or any change in capitalization) of outstanding options or stock appreciation rights without stockholder approval. The 2013 Incentive Plan provides for the grant of equity-based awards, including options to purchase shares of common stock, stock appreciation rights, bonus stock, restricted stock, restricted stock units and performance awards. The 2013 Incentive Plan will automatically expire on the tenth anniversary of its effective date. Our board of directors may terminate or amend the 2013 Incentive Plan at any time, subject to any requirement of stockholder approval required by applicable law, rule or regulation.

As amended, the number of shares of our common stock that may be issued under the 2013 Incentive Plan is 11,727,833 shares. To the extent that shares of our common stock subject to an outstanding option, stock appreciation right, stock award or performance award granted under the 2013 Incentive Plan are not issued or delivered by reason of the expiration, termination, cancellation or forfeiture of such award or the settlement of such award in cash, then such shares of our common stock generally shall again be available under the 2013 Incentive Plan. As of June 30, 2017 there were 6,207,889 shares available for future grant under the 2013 Incentive Plan.

Converted Awards

On July 16, 2014, the Company filed a registration statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-197461) to register 4,105,953 shares of common stock related to converted equity awards issued in connection with the Company's acquisition of WRECO. The converted awards have the same terms and conditions as the prior equity awards except that all performance share units were surrendered in exchange for time-vesting restricted stock units without any performance-based vesting conditions or requirements and the exercise price of each converted stock option is equal to the original exercise price divided by an exchange ratio of 2.1107, rounded down to the nearest whole number of shares of common stock. There will be no future grants under the WRECO equity incentive plans.

The following table presents compensation expense recognized related to all stock-based awards (in thousands):



	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017		2016		2017		2016
Total stock-based compensation	$	3,903	$	3,758	$	7,744	$	6,363

Stock-based compensation is charged to general and administrative expense on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. As of June 30, 2017, total unrecognized stock-based compensation related to all stock-based awards was $25.3 million and the weighted average term over which the expense was expected to be recognized was 1.9 years.

Summary of Stock Option Activity

The following table presents a summary of stock option awards for the six months ended June 30, 2017:



	Options		Weighted Average Exercise Price Per Share		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life	Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in thousands)
Options outstanding at December 31, 2016	2,971,370		$	13.12	4.4	$	1,568
Granted	—		—		—	—
Exercised	(234,219	)	10.46		—	—
Forfeited	(590,403	)	14.40		—	—
Options outstanding at June 30, 2017	2,146,748		13.27		5.1	2,555
Options exercisable at June 30, 2017	2,030,368		13.21		5.0	2,555

- 22 -

The intrinsic value of each stock option award outstanding or exercisable is the difference between the fair market value of the Company’s common stock at the end of the period and the exercise price of each stock option award to the extent it is considered “in-the-money”. A stock option award is considered to be “in-the-money” if the fair market value of the Company’s stock is greater than the exercise price of the stock option award. The aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding and options exercisable represents the value that would have been received by the holders of stock option awards had they exercised their stock option award on the last trading day of the period and sold the underlying shares at the closing price on that day.

Summary of Restricted Stock Unit Activity

The following table presents a summary of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) for the six months ended June 30, 2017:



	Restricted Stock Units		Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value Per Share		Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in thousands)
Nonvested RSUs at December 31, 2016	3,412,719		$	9.77	$	39,178
Granted	1,670,936		11.00		22,040
Vested	(714,612	)	12.34		—
Forfeited	(40,353	)	11.68		—
Nonvested RSUs at June 30, 2017	4,328,690		9.80		57,095

On March 1, 2016, the Company granted an aggregate of 1,120,677 time-vested RSUs to employees and officers. The RSUs granted vest in equal installments annually on the anniversary of the grant date over a three year period. The fair value of each RSU granted on March 1, 2016 was measured using a price of $10.49 per share, which was the closing stock price on the date of grant. Each award will be expensed on a straight-line basis over the vesting period.

On March 1, 2016, the Company granted 297,426, 285,986 and 125,834 performance-based RSUs to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, President, and Chief Financial Officer, respectively. The vesting, if at all, of these performance-based RSUs may range from 0% to 100% and will be based on the Company’s percentage attainment of specified threshold, target and maximum performance goals. The percentage of these performance-based RSUs that vest will be determined by comparing the Company’s total stockholder return (“TSR”) to the TSRs of a group of peer homebuilding companies. The performance period for these performance-based RSUs is January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2018. These performance-based RSUs will not vest if the Company’s total stockholder return from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2018 is not a positive number, provided that the executive will thereafter become vested in the award units, or portion thereof, that would have otherwise vested on December 31, 2018 if on any day after December 31, 2018 and on or before December 31, 2020, the Company’s total stockholder return is greater than zero and the executive is employed by the Company on that date. If the performance-based RSUs have not vested on or before December 31, 2020, such performance-based RSUs shall be cancelled and forfeited for no consideration. The fair value of these performance-based RSUs was determined to be $4.76 per share based on a Monte Carlo simulation. Each award will be expensed over the requisite service period.

On June 6, 2016, the Company granted an aggregate of 74,466 RSUs to the non-employee members of its board of directors. On March 27, 2017, 21,276 of these RSUs vested in their entirety and on May 25, 2017, 53,190 of these RSUs vested in their entirety. The fair value of each RSU granted on June 6, 2016 was measured using a price of $11.75 per share, which was the closing stock price on the date of grant. Each award was expensed on a straight-line basis over the vesting period.

On February 27, 2017, the Company granted an aggregate of 990,279 time-vested RSUs to employees and officers. The RSUs granted vest in equal installments annually on the anniversary of the grant date over a three year period. The fair value of each RSU granted on February 27, 2017 was measured using a price of $12.10 per share, which was the closing stock price on the date of grant. Each award will be expensed on a straight-line basis over the vesting period.

- 23 -

On February 27, 2017, the Company granted 257,851, 247,933 and 119,008 performance-based RSUs to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, President, and Chief Financial Officer, respectively. These performance-based RSUs are allocated in equal parts to two separate performance metrics: (1) TSR, with vesting based on the Company’s TSR relative to its peer-group homebuilders; and (2) earnings per share (“EPS”). The vesting, if at all, of these performance-based RSUs may range from 0% to 100% and will be based on the Company’s percentage attainment of specified threshold, target and maximum performance goals. The performance period for these performance-based RSUs is January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2019. The fair value of the performance-based RSUs related to the TSR metric was determined to be $6.16 per share based on a Monte Carlo simulation. The fair value of the performance-based RSUs related to the earnings per share goal was measured using a price of $12.10 per share, which was the closing stock price on the date of grant. Each award will be expensed over the requisite service period.

On May 30, 2017, the Company granted an aggregate of 55,865 RSUs to the non-employee members of its board of directors. These RSUs vest in their entirety on the day immediately prior to the Company's 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The fair value of each RSU granted on May 30, 2017 was measured using a price of $12.53 per share, which was the closing stock price on the date of grant. Each award will be expensed on a straight-line basis over the vesting period.

As RSUs vest for employees, a portion of the shares awarded is generally withheld to cover employee tax withholdings. As a result, the number of RSUs vested and the number of shares of TRI Pointe common stock issued will differ.


15.	Stock Repurchase Program

On February 23, 2017, our board of directors approved a new stock repurchase program, authorizing the repurchase of our common stock with an aggregate value of up to $100 million through March 31, 2018 (the “2017 Repurchase Program”). On July 25, 2017 our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to an additional $50 million of our common stock under the 2017 Repurchase Program, increasing the aggregate authorization from $100 million to $150 million. Purchases of common stock pursuant to the 2017 Repurchase Program may be made in open market transactions effected through a broker-dealer at prevailing market prices, in block trades, or by other means in accordance with federal securities laws, including pursuant to any trading plan that may be adopted in accordance with Rule 10b5-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). We are not obligated under the 2017 Repurchase Program to repurchase any specific number or amount of shares of common stock, and we may modify, suspend or discontinue the program at any time. Our management will determine the timing and amount of repurchase in its discretion based on a variety of factors, such as the market price of our common stock, corporate requirements, general market economic conditions and legal requirements. For the three months ended June 30, 2017, we repurchased and retired 7,979,618 shares of our common stock under the 2017 Repurchase Program at a weighted average price of $12.43 per share for a total cost of $99.2 million. For the six months ended June 30, 2017, we repurchased and retired 8,019,005 shares of our common stock under the 2017 Repurchase Program at a weighted average price of $12.43 per share for a total cost of $99.7 million.


16.	Income Taxes

We account for income taxes in accordance with ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes (“ASC 740”), which requires an asset and liability approach for measuring deferred taxes based on temporary differences between the financial statements and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates for the years in which taxes are expected to be paid or recovered. Each quarter we assess our deferred tax asset to determine whether all or any portion of the asset is more likely than not unrealizable under ASC 740. We are required to establish a valuation allowance for any portion of the asset we conclude is more likely than not to be unrealizable. Our assessment considers, among other things, the nature, frequency and severity of our current and cumulative losses, forecasts of our future taxable income, the duration of statutory carryforward periods and tax planning alternatives.

We had net deferred tax assets of $117.6 million and $123.2 million as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. We had a valuation allowance related to those net deferred tax assets of $323,000 as of both June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016. The Company will continue to evaluate both positive and negative evidence in determining the need for a valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets. Changes in positive and negative evidence, including differences between the Company's future operating results and the estimates utilized in the determination of the valuation allowance, could result in changes in the Company's estimate of the valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets. The accounting for deferred taxes is based upon estimates of future results. Differences between the anticipated and actual outcomes of these future results could have a material impact on the Company's consolidated results of operations or financial position. Also, changes in existing federal and state tax laws and tax rates could affect future tax results and the valuation allowance against the Company's deferred tax assets.

- 24 -

TRI Pointe has certain liabilities with Weyerhaeuser Company (“Weyerhaeuser”) related to a tax sharing agreement. As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, we had an income tax liability to Weyerhaeuser of $8.6 million, which is recorded in accrued expenses and other liabilities on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

Our provision for income taxes totaled $19.1 million and $41.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Our provision for income taxes totaled $23.7 million and $57.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The Company classifies any interest and penalties related to income taxes assessed by jurisdiction as part of income tax expense. The Company had no liabilities for uncertain tax positions recorded as of June 30, 2017 or December 31, 2016. The Company has not been assessed interest or penalties by any major tax jurisdictions related to prior years.


17.	Related Party Transactions

We had no related party transactions for the six months ended June 30, 2017.

In May of 2016, we entered into an agreement with an affiliate of Starwood Capital Group, a then greater than 5% holder of our common stock, to acquire 52 lots located in Azusa, California, for an aggregate purchase price of $18.4 million. In October of 2016, we acquired 27 of these lots for a purchase price of $9.6 million. Our former Chairman of the Board is also the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Starwood Capital Group. This acquisition was approved by our independent directors. In August of 2016, we entered into an agreement with an affiliate of Starwood Capital Group to purchase 257 lots located in Castle Rock, Colorado, for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $8.6 million. In October of 2016, we acquired 126 of these lots for a purchase price of $4.2 million. This acquisition was approved by our independent directors. As of March 27, 2017, Starwood Capital Group is no longer a related party.

In 2016, we acquired 93 lots located in Dublin, California, for a purchase price of approximately $25.5 million from an affiliate of BlackRock, Inc., a greater than 5% holder of our common stock. This acquisition was approved by the vote of our independent directors in accordance with the requirements of the Company’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.


18.	Supplemental Disclosure to Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

The following are supplemental disclosures to the consolidated statements of cash flows (in thousands):



	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest, net of amounts capitalized of $43,573 and $31,429 (Note 5)	$	—		$	—
Income taxes	$	10,950		$	55,270
Supplemental disclosures of noncash activities:
Amortization of senior note discount capitalized to real estate inventory	$	1,010		$	855
Amortization of deferred loan costs capitalized to real estate inventory	$	2,648		$	1,791
Effect of net consolidation and de-consolidation of variable interest entities:
Decrease in consolidated real estate inventory not owned	$	(3,275	)	$	(2,616	)
Decrease in noncontrolling interests	$	3,275		$	2,616

- 25 -


19.	Supplemental Guarantor Information

2021 Notes and 2027 Notes

On May 26, 2016, TRI Pointe Group issued the 2021 Notes. On June 5, 2017, TRI Pointe Group issued the 2027 Notes. All of TRI Pointe Group’s 100% owned subsidiaries that are guarantors (each a “Guarantor” and, collectively, the “Guarantors”) of the Credit Facility, including TRI Pointe Homes, are party to supplemental indentures pursuant to which they jointly and severally guarantee TRI Pointe Group’s obligations with respect to the 2021 Notes and the 2027 Notes. Each Guarantor of the 2021 Notes and the 2027 Notes is 100% owned by TRI Pointe Group, and all guarantees are full and unconditional, subject to customary exceptions pursuant to the indentures governing the 2021 Notes and the 2027 Notes, as described in the following paragraph. All of our non-Guarantor subsidiaries have nominal assets and operations and are considered minor, as defined in Rule 3-10(h) of Regulation S-X. In addition, TRI Pointe Group has no independent assets or operations, as defined in Rule 3-10(h) of Regulation S-X. There are no significant restrictions upon the ability of TRI Pointe Group or any Guarantor to obtain funds from any of their respective wholly owned subsidiaries by dividend or loan. None of the assets of our subsidiaries represent restricted net assets pursuant to Rule 4-08(e)(3) of Regulation S-X.

A Guarantor of the 2021 Notes and the 2027 Notes shall be released from all of its obligations under its guarantee if (i) all of the assets of the Guarantor have been sold; (ii) all of the equity interests of the Guarantor held by TRI Pointe Group or a subsidiary thereof have been sold; (iii) the Guarantor merges with and into TRI Pointe Group or another Guarantor, with TRI Pointe Group or such other Guarantor surviving the merger; (iv) the Guarantor is designated “unrestricted” for covenant purposes; (v) the Guarantor ceases to guarantee any indebtedness of TRI Pointe Group or any other Guarantor which gave rise to such Guarantor guaranteeing the 2021 Notes or the 2027 Notes; (vi) TRI Pointe Group exercises its legal defeasance or covenant defeasance options; or (vii) all obligations under the applicable supplemental indenture are discharged.

2019 Notes and 2024 Notes

TRI Pointe Group and TRI Pointe Homes are co-issuers of the 2019 Notes and the 2024 Notes. All of the Guarantors (other than TRI Pointe Homes) have entered into supplemental indentures pursuant to which they jointly and severally guarantee the obligations of TRI Pointe Group and TRI Pointe Homes with respect to the 2019 Notes and the 2024 Notes. Each Guarantor of the 2019 Notes and the 2024 Notes is 100% owned by TRI Pointe Group and TRI Pointe Homes, and all guarantees are full and unconditional, subject to customary exceptions pursuant to the indentures governing the 2019 Notes and the 2024 Notes, as described below.

A Guarantor of the 2019 Notes and the 2024 Notes shall be released from all of its obligations under its guarantee if (i) all of the assets of the Guarantor have been sold; (ii) all of the equity interests of the Guarantor held by TRI Pointe or a subsidiary thereof have been sold; (iii) the Guarantor merges with and into TRI Pointe or another Guarantor, with TRI Pointe or such other Guarantor surviving the merger; (iv) the Guarantor is designated “unrestricted” for covenant purposes; (v) the Guarantor ceases to guarantee any indebtedness of TRI Pointe or any other Guarantor which gave rise to such Guarantor guaranteeing the 2019 Notes and 2024 Notes; (vi) TRI Pointe exercises its legal defeasance or covenant defeasance options; or (vii) all obligations under the applicable indenture are discharged.

Presented below are the condensed consolidating balance sheets at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, condensed consolidating statements of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 and condensed consolidating statement of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016. Because TRI Pointe’s non-Guarantor subsidiaries are considered minor, as defined in Rule 3-10(h) of Regulation S-X, the non-Guarantor subsidiaries’ information is not separately presented in the tables below, but is included with the Guarantors. Additionally, because TRI Pointe Group has no independent assets or operations, as defined in Rule 3-10(h) of Regulation S-X, the condensed consolidated financial information of TRI Pointe Group and TRI Pointe Homes, the co-issuers of the 2019 Notes and 2024 Notes, is presented together in the column titled “Issuer”.

- 26 -

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet (in thousands):



	June 30, 2017
	Issuer		Guarantor Subsidiaries		Consolidating Adjustments			Consolidated TRI Pointe Group, Inc.
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	48,305	$	66,640	$	—		$	114,945
Receivables	16,436		56,567		—			73,003
Intercompany receivables	961,964		—		(961,964		)	—
Real estate inventories	922,893		2,285,448		—			3,208,341
Investments in unconsolidated entities	—		18,787		—			18,787
Goodwill and other intangible assets, net	156,604		4,624		—			161,228
Investments in subsidiaries	1,328,681		—		(1,328,681		)	—
Deferred tax assets, net	15,644		101,938		—			117,582
Other assets	8,127		49,984		—			58,111
Total Assets	$	3,458,654	$	2,583,988	$	(2,290,645	)	$	3,751,997

Liabilities
Accounts payable	$	8,208	$	55,043	$	—		$	63,251
Intercompany payables	—		961,964		(961,964		)	—
Accrued expenses and other liabilities	54,631		223,386		—			278,017
Unsecured revolving credit facility	150,000		—		—			150,000
Senior notes	1,467,861		—		—			1,467,861
Total Liabilities	1,680,700		1,240,393		(961,964		)	1,959,129

Equity
Total stockholders’ equity	1,777,954		1,328,681		(1,328,681		)	1,777,954
Noncontrolling interests	—		14,914		—			14,914
Total Equity	1,777,954		1,343,595		(1,328,681		)	1,792,868
Total Liabilities and Equity	$	3,458,654	$	2,583,988	$	(2,290,645	)	$	3,751,997

- 27 -

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet (in thousands):



	December 31, 2016
	Issuer		Guarantor Subsidiaries		Consolidating Adjustments			Consolidated TRI Pointe Group, Inc.
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	141,568	$	67,089	$	—		$	208,657
Receivables	26,692		55,808		—			82,500
Intercompany receivables	775,321		—		(775,321		)	—
Real estate inventories	868,088		2,042,539		—			2,910,627
Investments in unconsolidated entities	—		17,546		—			17,546
Goodwill and other intangible assets, net	156,604		4,891		—			161,495
Investments in subsidiaries	1,285,295		—		(1,285,295		)	—
Deferred tax assets, net	15,644		107,579		—			123,223
Other assets	11,401		49,191		—			60,592
Total Assets	$	3,280,613	$	2,344,643	$	(2,060,616	)	$	3,564,640

Liabilities
Accounts payable	$	20,637	$	49,615	$	—		$	70,252
Intercompany payables	—		775,321		(775,321		)	—
Accrued expenses and other liabilities	48,496		215,349		—			263,845
Unsecured revolving credit facility	200,000		—		—			200,000
Seller financed loans	13,726		—		—			13,726
Senior notes	1,168,307		—		—			1,168,307
Total Liabilities	1,451,166		1,040,285		(775,321		)	1,716,130

Equity
Total stockholders’ equity	1,829,447		1,285,295		(1,285,295		)	1,829,447
Noncontrolling interests	—		19,063		—			19,063
Total Equity	1,829,447		1,304,358		(1,285,295		)	1,848,510
Total Liabilities and Equity	$	3,280,613	$	2,344,643	$	(2,060,616	)	$	3,564,640

- 28 -

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations (in thousands):



	Three Months Ended June 30, 2017
	Issuer			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Consolidating Adjustments			Consolidated TRI Pointe Group, Inc.
Homebuilding:
Home sales revenue	$	154,212		$	414,604		$	—		$	568,816
Land and lot sales revenue	—			865			—			865
Other operations revenue	—			600			—			600
Total revenues	154,212			416,069			—			570,281
Cost of home sales	132,859			321,382			—			454,241
Cost of land and lot sales	—			644			—			644
Other operations expense	—			591			—			591
Sales and marketing	6,966			25,364			—			32,330
General and administrative	16,304			17,384			—			33,688
Homebuilding (loss) income from operations	(1,917		)	50,704			—			48,787
Equity in income of unconsolidated entities	—			1,508			—			1,508
Other income, net	9			35			—			44
Homebuilding (loss) income before income taxes	(1,908		)	52,247			—			50,339
Financial Services:
Revenues	—			345			—			345
Expenses	—			77			—			77
Equity in income of unconsolidated entities	—			1,294			—			1,294
Financial services income before income taxes	—			1,562			—			1,562
(Loss) income before income taxes	(1,908		)	53,809			—			51,901
Equity of net income of subsidiaries	34,415			—			(34,415		)	—
Benefit (provision) for income taxes	207			(19,305		)	—			(19,098		)
Net income	32,714			34,504			(34,415		)	32,803
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests	—			(89		)	—			(89		)
Net income available to common stockholders	$	32,714		$	34,415		$	(34,415	)	$	32,714

- 29 -

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations (in thousands):



	Three Months Ended June 30, 2016
	Issuer			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Consolidating Adjustments			Consolidated TRI Pointe Group, Inc.
Homebuilding:
Home sales revenue	$	152,827		$	404,098		$	—		$	556,925
Land and lot sales revenue	—			67,314			—			67,314
Other operations revenue	—			604			—			604
Total revenues	152,827			472,016			—			624,843
Cost of home sales	128,905			303,833			—			432,738
Cost of land and lot sales	—			14,460			—			14,460
Other operations expense	—			583			—			583
Sales and marketing	7,021			25,427			—			32,448
General and administrative	14,580			15,904			—			30,484
Homebuilding income from operations	2,321			111,809			—			114,130
Equity in income of unconsolidated entities	—			215			—			215
Other income, net	145			6			—			151
Homebuilding income before income taxes	2,466			112,030			—			114,496
Financial Services:
Revenues	—			379			—			379
Expenses	—			53			—			53
Equity in income of unconsolidated entities	—			1,284			—			1,284
Financial services income before income taxes	—			1,610			—			1,610
Income before income taxes	2,466			113,640			—			116,106
Equity of net income of subsidiaries	73,154			—			(73,154		)	—
Provision for income taxes	(1,694		)	(40,219		)	—			(41,913		)
Net income	73,926			73,421			(73,154		)	74,193
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests	—			(267		)	—			(267		)
Net income available to common stockholders	$	73,926		$	73,154		$	(73,154	)	$	73,926

- 30 -

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations (in thousands):



	Six Months Ended June 30, 2017
	Issuer			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Consolidating Adjustments			Consolidated TRI Pointe Group, Inc.
Homebuilding:
Home sales revenue	$	285,049		$	675,771		$	—		$	960,820
Land and lot sales revenue	—			1,443			—			1,443
Other operations revenue	—			1,168			—			1,168
Total revenues	285,049			678,382			—			963,431
Cost of home sales	245,117			527,528			—			772,645
Cost of land and lot sales	—			1,298			—			1,298
Other operations expense	—			1,151			—			1,151
Sales and marketing	13,449			45,581			—			59,030
General and administrative	33,553			34,784			—			68,337
Homebuilding income from operations	(7,070		)	68,040			—			60,970
Equity in income of unconsolidated entities	—			1,646			—			1,646
Other income, net	18			103			—			121
Homebuilding (loss) income before income taxes	(7,052		)	69,789			—			62,737
Financial Services:
Revenues	—			586			—			586
Expenses	—			151			—			151
Equity in income of unconsolidated entities	—			1,560			—			1,560
Financial services income before income taxes	—			1,995			—			1,995
(Loss) income before income taxes	(7,052		)	71,784			—			64,732
Equity of net income of subsidiaries	43,452			—			(43,452		)	—
Benefit (provision) for income taxes	4,507			(28,219		)				(23,712		)
Net income	40,907			43,565			(43,452		)	41,020
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests	—			(113		)	—			(113		)
Net income available to common stockholders	$	40,907		$	43,452		$	(43,452	)	$	40,907

- 31 -

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations (in thousands):



	Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
	Issuer			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Consolidating Adjustments			Consolidated TRI Pointe Group, Inc.
Homebuilding:
Home sales revenue	$	284,784		$	695,196		$	—		$	979,980
Land and lot sales revenue	—			67,669			—			67,669
Other operations revenue	—			1,184			—			1,184
Total revenues	284,784			764,049			—			1,048,833
Cost of home sales	239,357			517,880			—			757,237
Cost of land and lot sales	—			15,239			—			15,239
Other operations expense	—			1,149			—			1,149
Sales and marketing	13,085			45,684			—			58,769
General and administrative	27,792			31,223			—			59,015
Homebuilding income from operations	4,550			152,874			—			157,424
Equity in income of unconsolidated entities	—			201			—			201
Other income (loss), net	502			(236		)	—			266
Homebuilding income before income taxes	5,052			152,839			—			157,891
Financial Services:
Revenues	—			527			—			527
Expenses	—			111			—			111
Equity in income of unconsolidated entities	—			1,999			—			1,999
Financial services income before income taxes	—			2,415			—			2,415
Income before income taxes	5,052			155,254			—			160,306
Equity of net income of subsidiaries	100,385			—			(100,385		)	—
Provision for income taxes	(2,961		)	(54,442		)	—			(57,403		)
Net income	102,476			100,812			(100,385		)	102,903
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests	—			(427		)	—			(427		)
Net income available to common stockholders	$	102,476		$	100,385		$	(100,385	)	$	102,476

- 32 -

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows (in thousands):



	Six Months Ended June 30, 2017
	Issuer			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Consolidating Adjustments			Consolidated TRI Pointe Group, Inc.
Cash flows from operating activities
Net cash used in operating activities	$	(38,171	)	$	(182,529	)	$	—		$	(220,700	)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of property and equipment	(1,232		)	(561		)	—			(1,793		)
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment	—			6			—			6
Investments in unconsolidated entities	—			(462		)	—			(462		)
Intercompany	(184,084		)	—			184,084			—
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities	(185,316		)	(1,017		)	184,084			(2,249		)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Borrowings from debt	450,000			—			—			450,000
Repayment of debt	(213,726		)	—			—			(213,726		)
Debt issuance costs	(5,906		)	—			—			(5,906		)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests	—			(987		)	—			(987		)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock under share-based awards	2,449			—			—			2,449
Minimum tax withholding paid on behalf of employees for restricted stock units	(2,896		)	—			—			(2,896		)
Share repurchases	(99,697		)	—			—			(99,697		)
Intercompany	—			184,084			(184,084		)	—
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	130,224			183,097			(184,084		)	129,237
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	(93,263		)	(449		)	—			(93,712		)
Cash and cash equivalents - beginning of period	141,568			67,089			—			208,657
Cash and cash equivalents - end of period	$	48,305		$	66,640		$	—		$	114,945

- 33 -

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows (in thousands):



	Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
	Issuer			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Consolidating Adjustments			Consolidated TRI Pointe Group, Inc.
Cash flows from operating activities
Net cash used in operating activities	$	(149,745	)	$	(36,451	)	$	—		$	(186,196	)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of property and equipment	(372		)	(751		)	—			(1,123		)
Investments in unconsolidated entities	—			(32		)	—			(32		)
Distributions from unconsolidated entities	—			—						—
Intercompany	(39,469		)	—			39,469			—
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities	(39,841		)	(783		)	39,469			(1,155		)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Borrowings from notes payable	392,758			—			—			392,758
Repayment of notes payable	(276,426		)	(400		)	—			(276,826		)
Debt issuance costs	(5,110		)	—			—			(5,110		)
Net repayments of debt held by variable interest entities	—			(2,297		)	—			(2,297		)
Net proceeds of debt held by variable interest entities	—			—			—			—
Contributions from noncontrolling interests	—			1,810			—			1,810
Distributions to noncontrolling interests	—			(3,921		)	—			(3,921		)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock under share-based awards	18			—			—			18
Excess tax benefits of share-based awards	—			—			—			—
Minimum tax withholding paid on behalf of employees for restricted stock units	(1,359		)	—			—			(1,359		)
Share repurchases	(14,698		)	—			—			(14,698		)
Intercompany	—			39,469			(39,469		)	—
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	95,183			34,661			(39,469		)	90,375
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	(94,403		)	(2,573		)	—			(96,976		)
Cash and cash equivalents - beginning of period	147,771			66,714			—			214,485
Cash and cash equivalents - end of period	$	53,368		$	64,141		$	—		$	117,509

- 34 -


Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

CAUTIONARY NOTE CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains certain statements that are “forward-looking” statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. These forward-looking statements are based on our current intentions, beliefs, expectations and predictions for the future, and you should not place undue reliance on these statements. These statements use forward-looking terminology, are based on various assumptions made by us, and may not be accurate because of risks and uncertainties surrounding the assumptions that are made.

Factors listed in this section–as well as other factors not included–may cause actual results to differ significantly from the forward-looking statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. There is no guarantee that any of the events anticipated by the forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q will occur, or if any of the events occurs, there is no guarantee what effect it will have on our operations, financial condition, or share price.

We undertake no, and hereby disclaim any, obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, unless required by law. However, we reserve the right to make such updates or revisions from time to time by press release, periodic report, or other method of public disclosure without the need for specific reference to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. No such update or revision shall be deemed to indicate that other statements not addressed by such update or revision remain correct or create an obligation to provide any other updates or revisions.

Forward-Looking Statements

These forward-looking statements are generally accompanied by words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “goal,” “intend,” “may,” “might,” “plan,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “target,” “will,” “would,” or other words that convey the uncertainty of future events or outcomes. These forward-looking statements may include, but are not limited to, statements regarding our strategy, projections and estimates concerning the timing and success of specific projects and our future production, land and lot sales, the outcome of legal proceedings, operational and financial results, including our estimates for growth, financial condition, sales prices, prospects and capital spending.

Risks, Uncertainties and Assumptions

The major risks and uncertainties–and assumptions that are made–that affect our business and may cause actual results to differ from these forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to:


•	the effect of general economic conditions, including employment rates, housing starts, interest rate levels, availability of financing for home mortgages and strength of the U.S. dollar;


•	market demand for our products, which is related to the strength of the various U.S. business segments and U.S. and international economic conditions;


•	levels of competition;


•	the successful execution of our internal performance plans, including restructuring and cost reduction initiatives;


•	global economic conditions;


•	raw material prices;


•	oil and other energy prices;


•	the effect of weather, including the re-occurrence of drought conditions in California;


•	the risk of loss from earthquakes, volcanoes, fires, floods, droughts, windstorms, hurricanes, pest infestations and other natural disasters;


•	transportation costs;


•	federal and state tax policies;


•	the effect of land use, environment and other governmental laws and regulations;


•	legal proceedings or disputes and the adequacy of reserves;


•	risks relating to any unforeseen changes to or effects on liabilities, future capital expenditures, revenues, expenses, earnings, synergies, indebtedness, financial condition, losses and future prospects;


•	change in accounting principles;


•	risks related to unauthorized access to our computer systems, theft of our homebuyers’ confidential information or other forms of cyber-attack; and


•	other factors described in “Risk Factors.”

- 35 -

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related condensed notes thereto contained elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. The information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is not a complete description of our business or the risks associated with an investment in our securities. We urge investors to review and consider carefully the various disclosures made by us in this report and in our other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), including our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 and subsequent reports on Form 8-K, which discuss our business in greater detail. The section entitled “Risk Factors” set forth in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K, and similar disclosures in our other SEC filings, discuss some of the important risk factors that may affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. Investors should carefully consider those risks, in addition to the information in this report and in our other filings with the SEC, before deciding to invest in, or maintain an investment in, our common stock.

Overview and Outlook

We continue to be encouraged by the strength of the overall U.S. new-home market, which continues to be supported by strong general economic conditions, low unemployment levels, modest wage gains, low interest rates, and increasing consumer confidence combined with a limited supply of new and existing homes. We believe demand will continue to be strong across the U.S. in general and in a majority of the markets in which we operate over the next several years. Nevertheless, we continue to see variability from market to market with demand mostly driven by general local economic conditions. Homebuilding activity in many markets continues to be constrained by land and labor availability, as well as fee increases and delays imposed by local municipalities, which we expect will continue to constrict supply. We believe current demand and supply trends will result in a continued growth trajectory in the homebuilding market, with consumer, job and household formation growth serving as leading indicators of positive demand.

- 36 -

Consolidated Financial Data (in thousands, except per share amounts):



	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016			2017			2016
Homebuilding:
Home sales revenue	$	568,816		$	556,925		$	960,820		$	979,980
Land and lot sales revenue	865			67,314			1,443			67,669
Other operations revenue	600			604			1,168			1,184
Total revenues	570,281			624,843			963,431			1,048,833
Cost of home sales	454,241			432,738			772,645			757,237
Cost of land and lot sales	644			14,460			1,298			15,239
Other operations expense	591			583			1,151			1,149
Sales and marketing	32,330			32,448			59,030			58,769
General and administrative	33,688			30,484			68,337			59,015
Homebuilding income from operations	48,787			114,130			60,970			157,424
Equity in income of unconsolidated entities	1,508			215			1,646			201
Other income, net	44			151			121			266
Homebuilding income before income taxes	50,339			114,496			62,737			157,891
Financial Services:
Revenues	345			379			586			527
Expenses	77			53			151			111
Equity in income of unconsolidated entities	1,294			1,284			1,560			1,999
Financial services income before income taxes	1,562			1,610			1,995			2,415
Income before income taxes	51,901			116,106			64,732			160,306
Provision for income taxes	(19,098		)	(41,913		)	(23,712		)	(57,403		)
Net income	32,803			74,193			41,020			102,903
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests	(89		)	(267		)	(113		)	(427		)
Net income available to common stockholders	$	32,714		$	73,926		$	40,907		$	102,476
Earnings per share
Basic	$	0.21		$	0.46		$	0.26		$	0.63
Diluted	$	0.21		$	0.46		$	0.26		$	0.63

Three Months Ended June 30, 2017 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2016

Net New Home Orders, Average Selling Communities and Monthly Absorption Rates by Segment



	Three Months Ended June 30, 2017			Three Months Ended June 30, 2016			Percentage Change
	Net New Home Orders	Average Selling Communities	Monthly Absorption Rates	Net New Home Orders	Average Selling Communities	Monthly Absorption Rates	Net New Home Orders		Average Selling Communities		Monthly Absorption Rates
Maracay Homes	162	16.0	3.4	191	18.5	3.4	(15	)%	(14	)%	—	%
Pardee Homes	483	28.8	5.6	340	22.3	5.1	42	%	29	%	10	%
Quadrant Homes	107	6.8	5.2	92	9.0	3.4	16	%	(24	)%	53	%
Trendmaker Homes	129	31.7	1.4	133	28.0	1.6	(3	)%	13	%	(13	)%
TRI Pointe Homes	413	31.5	4.4	379	28.2	4.5	9	%	12	%	(2	)%
Winchester Homes	151	12.0	4.2	123	13.5	3.0	23	%	(11	)%	40	%
Total	1,445	126.8	3.8	1,258	119.5	3.5	15	%	6	%	9	%

- 37 -

Net new home orders for the three months ended June 30, 2017 increased by 187 orders, or 15%, to 1,445, compared to 1,258 during the prior year period. The increase in net new home orders was due to a 6% increase in average selling communities and a 9% increase in monthly absorption rates.

Maracay Homes reported a 15% decrease in net new home orders largely driven by a 14% decrease in average selling communities. The decrease in average selling communities was due to the timing of community openings and closings compared to the prior year period. Pardee Homes increased net new home orders by 42% due primarily to a 29% increase in average community count and a 10% increase in monthly absorption rate. The increase in monthly absorption rate was driven by strong demand for new community openings, particularly in the San Diego and Los Angeles markets. Net new home orders increased 16% at Quadrant Homes due primarily to a 53% increase in monthly absorption rate, which was partially offset by a 24% decrease in average selling communities. The increase in monthly absorption rate was the result of our well located communities and continued strong market fundamentals. Trendmaker Homes' net new home orders remained relatively flat due to a 13% increase in average selling communities, offset by a 13% decrease in monthly absorption rate. The Houston market continues to be challenged by the decrease in oil prices and the related impact on job growth. TRI Pointe Homes’ net new home orders increased 9% due primarily to a 12% increase in average selling communities, which was slightly offset by a 2% decrease in monthly absorption rate. Demand remains strong in the markets in which TRI Pointe Homes builds, as evidenced by a monthly absorption rate of 4.4 homes at average selling prices above the Company average. Winchester Homes experienced a 23% increase in net new home orders largely as a result of a 40% increase in monthly absorption rate, partially offset by an 11% decrease in average selling communities. The increase in monthly absorption rate was due to strong customer demand in some of our larger master plan communities.

Backlog Units, Dollar Value and Average Sales Price by Segment (dollars in thousands)



	As of June 30, 2017					As of June 30, 2016					Percentage Change
	Backlog Units	Backlog Dollar Value		Average Sales Price		Backlog Units	Backlog Dollar Value		Average Sales Price		Backlog Units		Backlog Dollar Value		Average Sales Price
Maracay Homes	311	$	156,611	$	504	360	$	153,107	$	425	(14	)%	2	%	19	%
Pardee Homes	553	369,021		667		401	236,903		591		38	%	56	%	13	%
Quadrant Homes	201	144,204		717		171	99,366		581		18	%	45	%	23	%
Trendmaker Homes	204	105,663		518		177	94,850		536		15	%	11	%	(3	)%
TRI Pointe Homes	613	428,281		699		516	330,262		640		19	%	30	%	9	%
Winchester Homes	226	135,437		599		173	111,731		646		31	%	21	%	(7	)%
Total	2,108	$	1,339,217	$	635	1,798	$	1,026,219	$	571	17	%	31	%	11	%

Backlog units reflect the number of homes, net of actual cancellations experienced during the period, for which we have entered into a sales contract with a homebuyer but for which we have not yet delivered the home. Homes in backlog are generally delivered within three to nine months, although we may experience cancellations of sales contracts prior to delivery. Our cancellation rate of homebuyers who contracted to buy a home but did not close escrow (as a percentage of overall orders) increased to 15% from 13% for the same period in 2016. The dollar value of backlog was approximately $1.3 billion as of June 30, 2017, an increase of $313.0 million, or 31%, compared to $1.0 billion as of June 30, 2016. This increase was due to an increase in backlog of 310 homes, or 17%, to 2,108 as of June 30, 2017, compared to 1,798 as of June 30, 2016 and an 11% increase in the average sales price of homes in backlog to $635,000 as of June 30, 2017, compared to $571,000 as of June 30, 2016.

Maracay Homes’ backlog dollar value increased 2% compared to the prior year due to a 19% increase in average sales price, offset by a 14% decrease in units. The increase in average sales price was due to a product mix shift that included a greater proportion of move-up product compared to the prior year. Pardee Homes' backlog dollar value increased 56% due to an increase in both backlog units and average selling price. The increase in backlog units was due to the 42% increase in orders during the quarter while the increase in average selling price was due to increased pricing power in our markets and a higher end product mix with higher price points. Quadrant Homes’ backlog dollar value increased 45% as a result of an increase in backlog units and average sales price. The increase in backlog units directly relates to the 16% increase in orders during the quarter and the increase in average sales price was related to a higher mix of homes in backlog from the core Seattle markets of King and Snohomish counties, which have higher price points. Trendmaker Homes' backlog dollar value increased 11% primarily due to a 15% increase in backlog units. The increase in backlog units was related to the 10% increase in net new home orders for the six months ended June 30, 2017. TRI Pointe Homes’ backlog dollar value increased 30% due to an increase in backlog units and average selling price. The increase in backlog units was the result of a 19% increase in orders for

- 38 -

the six month ended June 30, 2017. Winchester Homes’ backlog dollar value increased 21% largely driven by the increase in backlog units as a result of the 23% increase in orders during the quarter.

New Homes Delivered, Homes Sales Revenue and Average Sales Price by Segment (dollars in thousands)



	Three Months Ended June 30, 2017					Three Months Ended June 30, 2016					Percentage Change
	New Homes Delivered	Home Sales Revenue		Average Sales Price		New Homes Delivered	Home Sales Revenue		Average Sales Price		New Homes Delivered		Home Sales Revenue		Average Sales Price
Maracay Homes	164	$	75,754	$	462	120	$	47,857	$	399	37	%	58	%	16	%
Pardee Homes	372	180,377		485		318	178,602		562		17	%	1	%	(14	)%
Quadrant Homes	64	39,667		620		105	54,708		521		(39	)%	(27	)%	19	%
Trendmaker Homes	133	64,798		487		126	63,230		502		6	%	2	%	(3	)%
TRI Pointe Homes	243	154,212		635		217	152,827		704		12	%	1	%	(10	)%
Winchester Homes	95	54,008		569		108	59,701		553		(12	)%	(10	)%	3	%
Total	1,071	$	568,816	$	531	994	$	556,925	$	560	8	%	2	%	(5	)%

Home sales revenue increased $11.9 million, or 2%, to $568.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017. The increase was comprised of $43.1 million related to an increase in homes delivered to 1,071 for the three months ended June 30, 2017 from 994 in the prior year period, offset by a $29,000 or 5%, decrease in the average sales price of homes delivered to $531,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2017, from $560,000 in the prior year period.

Maracay Homes had a 58% increase in home sales revenue due to an increase in both new home deliveries and average sales price. The increase in new home deliveries was driven by higher backlog to start the quarter compared to the same period in the prior year. The increase in average sales price was due to a product mix shift that included a greater proportion of move-up product compared to the prior year. Pardee Homes’ home sales revenue remained relatively flat with an offsetting increase to new home deliveries and decrease in average sales price. Quadrant Homes decreased home sales revenue by 27% due to a 39% decrease in new homes delivered, partially offset by a 19% increase in average sales price. The large decrease in new homes delivered was due to a lower number of backlog units at the start of the quarter as compared to the prior year period largely due to a lower average selling communities count. The increase in average sales price was the result of delivering more units in the core Seattle markets of King and Snohomish counties, which have higher price points. Home sales revenue remained relatively flat at both Trendmaker Homes and TRI Pointe Homes due to offsetting increases to new home deliveries and decreases in average sales prices at each. Home sales revenue decreased at Winchester Homes by 10% largely due to a decrease in homes delivered. The decrease in homes delivered was primarily the result of the timing of deliveries.

Homebuilding Gross Margins (dollars in thousands)



	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2017			%		2016			%
Home sales revenue	$	568,816		100.0	%	$	556,925		100.0	%
Cost of home sales	454,241			79.9	%	432,738			77.7	%
Homebuilding gross margin	114,575			20.1	%	124,187			22.3	%
Add: interest in cost of home sales	13,145			2.3	%	11,438			2.1	%
Add: impairments and lot option abandonments	507			0.1	%	107			0.0	%
Adjusted homebuilding gross margin⁽¹⁾	$	128,227		22.5	%	$	135,732		24.4	%
Homebuilding gross margin percentage	20.1		%			22.3		%
Adjusted homebuilding gross margin percentage⁽¹⁾	22.5		%			24.4		%

__________


⁽¹⁾	Non-GAAP financial measure (as discussed below).

- 39 -

Our homebuilding gross margin percentage decreased to 20.1% for the three months ended June 30, 2017 as compared to 22.3% for the prior year period. The decrease in gross margin percentage was primarily due to the mix of deliveries, in particular a lower portion of overall deliveries were from our long-dated California communities, which produce gross margins above the Company average. The change in mix was primarily based on the timing of deliveries. Excluding interest and impairment and lot option abandonments in cost of home sales, adjusted homebuilding gross margin percentage was 22.5% for the three months ended June 30, 2017, compared to 24.4% for the prior year period.

Adjusted homebuilding gross margin is a non-GAAP financial measure. We believe this information is meaningful as it isolates the impact that leverage and noncash charges have on homebuilding gross margin and permits investors to make better comparisons with our competitors, who adjust gross margins in a similar fashion. Because adjusted homebuilding gross margin is not calculated in accordance with GAAP, it may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for, or superior to, financial measures prepared in accordance with GAAP. See the table above reconciling this non-GAAP financial measure to homebuilding gross margin, the nearest GAAP equivalent.

Land and Lot Gross Margins (dollars in thousands)



	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2017		%		2016		%
Land and lot sales revenue	$	865	100.0	%	$	67,314	100.0	%
Cost of land and lot sales	644		74.5	%	14,460		21.5	%
Land and lot gross margin	$	221	25.5	%	$	52,854	78.5	%

Our land and lot gross margin percentage decreased to 25.5% for the three months ended June 30, 2017 as compared to 78.5% for the prior year period. In June of 2016, Pardee Homes sold two parcels, comprised of 102 homebuilding lots in the Pacific Highlands Ranch community in San Diego, California. Pardee Homes received $61.6 million in cash proceeds from the sales. These sales resulted in significant gross margins due to the low land basis of the Pacific Highlands Ranch community, which was acquired in 1981. Land and lot sales gross margin percentage can vary significantly due to the type of land and its related cost basis.

Sales and Marketing, General and Administrative Expense (dollars in thousands)



	Three Months Ended June 30,				As a Percentage of Home Sales Revenue
	2017		2016		2017		2016
Sales and marketing	$	32,330	$	32,448	5.7	%	5.8	%
General and administrative (G&A)	33,688		30,484		5.9	%	5.5	%
Total sales and marketing and G&A	$	66,018	$	62,932	11.6	%	11.3	%

Sales and marketing expense as a percentage of home sales revenue decreased to 5.7% for the three month period ended June 30, 2017, compared to 5.8% for the prior year period. The decrease was the result of higher operating leverage on the fixed components of sales and marketing expenses as a result of the 2% increase in homes sales revenue and the slight decrease in total sales and marketing expense.

General and administrative (“G&A”) expenses as a percentage of home sales revenue increased to 5.9% of home sales revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2017 compared to 5.5% for the prior year period. G&A expenses increased to $33.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017 compared to $30.5 million in the prior year period primarily as a result of additional headcount to support future growth, along with our continued expansion into Austin, Texas and Los Angeles, California.

Total sales and marketing and G&A (“SG&A”) as a percentage of home sales revenue increased to 11.6% for the three month period ended June 30, 2017, compared to 11.3% in the prior year period. Total SG&A expense increased $3.1 million, to $66.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017 from $62.9 million in the prior year period.

- 40 -

Interest

Interest, which was incurred principally to finance land acquisitions, land development and home construction, totaled $19.9 million and $16.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. All interest incurred in both periods was capitalized. The increase in interest incurred during the three months ended June 30, 2017 as compared to the prior year period was primarily attributable to an increase in our debt balance and our weighted average interest rate as a result of the issuance of our 2021 Notes in May of 2016, along with our 2027 Notes in June of 2017.

Income Tax

For the three months ended June 30, 2017, we recorded a tax provision of $19.1 million based on an effective tax rate of 36.8%. For the three months ended June 30, 2016, we recorded a tax provision of $41.9 million based on an effective tax rate of 36.1%. The higher current year income tax rate is due to the expiration of federal energy tax credits in 2017. These federal energy tax credits favorably impacted the prior year income tax rate, with no comparable benefit in the current year period. The decrease in provision for income taxes is due to a decrease in income before income taxes of $64.2 million to $51.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $116.1 million for the prior year period.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2016

Net New Home Orders, Average Selling Communities and Monthly Absorption Rates by Segment



	Six Months Ended June 30, 2017			Six Months Ended June 30, 2016			Percentage Change
	Net New Home Orders	Average Selling Communities	Monthly Absorption Rates	Net New Home Orders	Average Selling Communities	Monthly Absorption Rates	Net New Home Orders		Average Selling Communities		Monthly Absorption Rates
Maracay Homes	346	16.1	3.6	392	18.3	3.6	(12	)%	(12	)%	—	%
Pardee Homes	861	28.6	5.0	653	22.7	4.8	32	%	26	%	4	%
Quadrant Homes	227	7.3	5.2	225	9.0	4.2	1	%	(19	)%	24	%
Trendmaker Homes	280	31.9	1.5	255	25.7	1.7	10	%	24	%	(12	)%
TRI Pointe Homes	766	30.7	4.2	644	26.8	4.0	19	%	15	%	5	%
Winchester Homes	264	12.0	3.7	238	13.4	3.0	11	%	(10	)%	23	%
Total	2,744	126.6	3.6	2,407	115.9	3.5	14	%	9	%	3	%

Net new home orders for the six months ended June 30, 2017 increased by 337 orders or 14% to 2,744, compared to 2,407 during the prior year period. The increase in net new home orders was due to a 9% increase in average selling communities and a 3% increase in monthly absorption rates.

Maracay Homes had a 12% decrease in net new home orders driven by a 12% decrease in average selling communities due to the timing of community openings and closings compared to the prior year period. Pardee Homes increased net new home orders by 32% largely due to a 26% increase in average selling communities and a strong absorption rate of 5.0 orders per community per month. Net new home orders increased slightly at Quadrant Homes due to a 24% increase in monthly absorption rate due to continued strong market fundamentals. This was offset by a 19% decrease in average selling communities due to the timing of new community openings and closings. Trendmaker Homes increased net new home orders by 10% primarily based on a 24% increase in average selling communities. Trendmaker Homes’ monthly absorption rate has been lower than the Company average due to the decrease in oil prices and the related impact on job growth in the Houston market. TRI Pointe Homes’ net new home orders increased 19% due to a 15% increase in average selling communities and a 5% increase in monthly absorption rate. Demand remains strong in the markets in which TRI Pointe Homes builds, as evidenced by a monthly absorption rate of 4.2 homes at average selling prices above the Company average. Winchester Homes experienced an 11% increase in net new home orders due to a 23% increase in monthly absorption rate, partially offset by a 10% decrease in average selling communities. The increase in monthly absorption rate was due to strong customer demand in some of our larger master plan communities.

- 41 -

New Homes Delivered, Homes Sales Revenue and Average Sales Price by Segment (dollars in thousands)



	Six Months Ended June 30, 2017					Six Months Ended June 30, 2016					Percentage Change
	New Homes Delivered	Home Sales Revenue		Average Sales Price		New Homes Delivered	Home Sales Revenue		Average Sales Price		New Homes Delivered		Home Sales Revenue		Average Sales Price
Maracay Homes	283	$	126,814	$	448	235	$	93,294	$	397	20	%	36	%	13	%
Pardee Homes	568	264,076		465		526	297,535		566		8	%	(11	)%	(18	)%
Quadrant Homes	127	79,550		626		197	100,186		509		(36	)%	(21	)%	23	%
Trendmaker Homes	239	116,737		488		214	107,015		500		12	%	9	%	(2	)%
TRI Pointe Homes	451	285,049		632		418	284,784		681		8	%	—	%	(7	)%
Winchester Homes	161	88,594		550		175	97,166		555		(8	)%	(9	)%	(1	)%
Total	1,829	960,820		$	525	1,765	$	979,980	$	555	4	%	(2	)%	(5	)%

Home sales revenue decreased $19.2 million, or 2%, to $960.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017. The decrease was comprised of: (i) $54.7 million related to a $30,000, or 5%, decrease in the average sales price of homes delivered to $525,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2017, from $555,000 in the prior year period, offset by (ii) an increase of $35.5 million related to the increase in homes delivered by 4%, or 64 homes, to 1,829 for the six months ended June 30, 2017, from 1,765 in the prior year period.

Maracay Homes had a 36% increase in home sales revenue due to increases in both new homes delivered and average sales price. The increase in new homes delivered was due to starting the year with more homes in backlog. The increase in average sales price was driven by a product mix shift that included a greater proportion of move-up product compared to the prior year period. Pardee Homes’ home sales revenue decreased by 11% largely due to an 18% decrease in average sales price. The decrease in average sales price was due to a lower mix of new homes delivered from its coastally located communities in San Diego, California, which have higher price points. This difference in product mix was due to the timing of deliveries compared to the prior year period. Quadrant Homes decreased home sales revenue by 21%, a result of a 36% decrease in new homes delivered, partially offset by a 23% increase in average sales price. The large decrease in new homes delivered was due to starting the year with a lower number of backlog units compared to the prior year period as a result of lower average selling communities. The large increase in average sales price was the result of delivering more homes in the core Seattle markets of King and Snohomish counties, which have higher price points. Home sales revenue increased 9% at Trendmaker Homes mainly due to a 12% increase in new homes delivered. The increase in new homes delivered was a result of a higher number of backlog units at the beginning of the year compared to the prior year period and the 19% increase in net new home orders during the current year period. Home sales revenue was relatively flat at TRI Pointe Homes with an offsetting 8% increase in new homes delivered and 7% decrease in average sales price. Home sales revenue decreased at Winchester Homes by 9% mainly due to an 8% decrease in new homes delivered due to the timing of deliveries.

Homebuilding Gross Margins (dollars in thousands)



	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017			%		2016			%
Home sales revenue	$	960,820		100.0	%	$	979,980		100.0	%
Cost of home sales	772,645			80.4	%	757,237			77.3	%
Homebuilding gross margin	188,175			19.6	%	222,743			22.7	%
Add: interest in cost of home sales	22,825			2.4	%	20,268			2.1	%
Add: impairments and lot option abandonments	795			0.1	%	289			—	%
Adjusted homebuilding gross margin⁽¹⁾	$	211,795		22.0	%	$	243,300		24.8	%
Homebuilding gross margin percentage	19.6		%			22.7		%
Adjusted homebuilding gross margin percentage⁽¹⁾	22.0		%			24.8		%

__________


⁽¹⁾	Non-GAAP financial measure (as discussed below).

- 42 -

Our homebuilding gross margin percentage decreased to 19.6% for the six months ended June 30, 2017 as compared to 22.7% for the prior year period. The decrease in gross margin percentage was primarily due to the mix of deliveries, in particular a lower portion of overall deliveries were from our long-dated California communities, which produce gross margins above the Company average. Excluding interest and impairment and lot option abandonments in cost of home sales, adjusted homebuilding gross margin percentage was 22.0% for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to 24.8% for the prior year period.

Sales and Marketing, General and Administrative Expense (dollars in thousands)



	Six Months Ended June 30,				As a Percentage of Home Sales Revenue
	2017		2016		2017		2016
Sales and marketing	$	59,030	$	58,769	6.1	%	6.0	%
General and administrative (G&A)	68,337		59,015		7.1	%	6.0	%
Total sales and marketing and G&A	$	127,367	$	117,784	13.3	%	12.0	%

Sales and marketing expense as a percentage of home sales revenue increased to 6.1% for the six month period ended June 30, 2017, compared to 6.0% for the prior year period. The increase was primarily the result of lower operating leverage on the fixed components of sales and marketing expenses as a result of the 2% decrease in homes sales revenue. Total sales and marketing expense increased by $261,000 to $59.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $58.8 million in the prior year period.

G&A expenses as a percentage of home sales revenue increased to 7.1% of home sales revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to 6.0% for the prior year period. The increase was due in part to decreased operating leverage resulting from the 2% decrease in home sales revenue. G&A expenses increased to $68.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to $59.0 million in the prior year period primarily as a result of additional headcount to support future growth, along with our continued expansion into Austin, Texas and Los Angeles, California.

SG&A as a percentage of home sales revenue increased to 13.3% for the six month period ended June 30, 2017, compared to 12.0% in the prior year period. Total SG&A expense increased $9.6 million, to $127.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 from $117.8 million in the prior year period.

Interest

Interest, which was incurred principally to finance land acquisitions, land development and home construction, totaled $38.8 million and $31.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. All interest incurred in both periods was capitalized. The increase in interest incurred during the six months ended June 30, 2017 as compared to the prior year period was primarily attributable to an increase in our debt balance and our weighted average interest rate as a result of the issuance of our 2021 Notes in May of 2016, along with our 2027 Notes in June of 2017.

Income Tax

For the six months ended June 30, 2017, we recorded a tax provision of $23.7 million based on an effective tax rate of 36.6%. For the six months ended June 30, 2016, we recorded a tax provision of $57.4 million based on an effective tax rate of 35.8%. The higher current year income tax rate is due to the expiration of federal energy tax credits in 2017. These federal energy tax credits favorably impacted the prior year income tax rate, with no comparable benefit in the current year period. The decrease in provision for income taxes is due to a decrease in income before income taxes of $95.6 million to $64.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $160.3 million for the prior year period.

- 43 -

Lots Owned or Controlled by Segment

Excluded from owned and controlled lots are those related to Note 6, Investments in Unconsolidated Entities. The table below summarizes our lots owned or controlled by segment as of the dates presented:



	June 30,		Increase (Decrease)
	2017	2016	Amount		%
Lots Owned
Maracay Homes	1,993	1,491	502		34	%
Pardee Homes	16,037	16,154	(117	)	(1	)%
Quadrant Homes	1,107	1,008	99		10	%
Trendmaker Homes	1,578	1,321	257		19	%
TRI Pointe Homes	2,921	3,007	(86	)	(3	)%
Winchester Homes	1,672	1,916	(244	)	(13	)%
Total	25,308	24,897	411		2	%
Lots Controlled⁽¹⁾
Maracay Homes	1,030	738	292		40	%
Pardee Homes	125	172	(47	)	(27	)%
Quadrant Homes	745	408	337		83	%
Trendmaker Homes	334	462	(128	)	(28	)%
TRI Pointe Homes	573	723	(150	)	(21	)%
Winchester Homes	777	280	497		178	%
Total	3,584	2,783	801		29	%
Total Lots Owned or Controlled⁽¹⁾	28,892	27,680	1,212		4	%

__________


⁽¹⁾	As of June 30, 2017 and 2016, lots controlled included lots that were under land or lot option contracts or purchase contracts.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Overview

Our principal uses of capital for the six months ended June 30, 2017 were operating expenses, land purchases, land development and home construction. We used funds generated by our operations and available borrowings to meet our short-term working capital requirements. We remain focused on generating positive margins in our homebuilding operations and acquiring desirable land positions in order to maintain a strong balance sheet and keep us poised for growth. As of June 30, 2017, we had $114.9 million of cash and cash equivalents. We believe we have sufficient cash and sources of financing to fund operations for at least the next twelve months.

Our board of directors will consider a number of factors when evaluating our level of indebtedness and when making decisions regarding the incurrence of new indebtedness, including the purchase price of assets to be acquired with debt financing, the estimated market value of our assets and the ability of particular assets, and our Company as a whole, to generate cash flow to cover the expected debt service. Our charter does not contain a limitation on the amount of debt we may incur and our board of directors may change our target debt levels at any time without the approval of our stockholders.

Senior Notes

In June 2017, TRI Pointe Group issued $300 million aggregate principal amount of 5.250% Senior Notes due 2027 (the “2027 Notes”) at 100.00% of their aggregate principal amount. Net proceeds of this issuance was $296.3 million, after debt issuance costs and discounts. The 2027 Notes mature on June 1, 2027 and interest is paid semiannually in arrears on June 1 and December 1.

- 44 -

In May 2016, TRI Pointe Group issued $300 million aggregate principal amount of 4.875% Senior Notes due 2021 (the “2021 Notes”) at 99.44% of their aggregate principal amount. Net proceeds of this issuance was $293.9 million, after debt issuance costs and discounts. The 2021 Notes mature on July 1, 2021 and interest is paid semiannually in arrears on January 1 and July 1.

TRI Pointe Group and TRI Pointe Homes are co-issuers of $450 million aggregate principal amount of 4.375% Senior Notes due 2019 (“2019 Notes”) and $450 million aggregate principal amount of 5.875% Senior Notes due 2024 (“2024 Notes”). The 2019 Notes were issued at 98.89% of their aggregate principal amount and the 2024 Notes were issued at 98.15% of their aggregate principal amount. The net proceeds from the offering were $861.3 million, after debt issuance costs and discounts. The 2019 Notes and 2024 Notes mature on June 15, 2019 and June 15, 2024. Interest is payable semiannually in arrears on June 15 and December 15.

Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility

On June 20, 2017, the Company modified its existing unsecured revolving credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) to extend the maturity date by two years to May 18, 2021, while decreasing the total commitments under the Credit Facility to $600 million from $625 million. In addition, the Credit Facility was modified to give the Company the option to make offers to the lenders to extend the maturity date of the facility in twelve-month increments, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions. The Credit Facility contains a sublimit of $75 million for letters of credit. The Company may borrow under the Credit Facility in the ordinary course of business to fund its operations, including its land development and homebuilding activities. Borrowings under the Credit Facility will be governed by, among other things, a borrowing base. The Credit Facility contains customary affirmative and negative covenants, including financial covenants relating to consolidated tangible net worth, leverage, and liquidity or interest coverage. Interest rates on borrowings will be based on either a daily Eurocurrency base rate or a Eurocurrency rate, in either case, plus a spread ranging from 1.25% to 2.00% depending on the Company’s leverage ratio. As of June 30, 2017, the outstanding balance under the Credit Facility was $150.0 million with an interest rate 2.97% per annum and $442.2 million of availability after considering the borrowing base provisions and outstanding letters of credit. At June 30, 2017, we had outstanding letters of credit of $7.8 million. These letters of credit were issued to secure various financial obligations. We believe it is not probable that any outstanding letters of credit will be drawn upon.

Stock Repurchase Program

On February 23, 2017, our board of directors approved the 2017 Repurchase Program. On July 25, 2017 our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to an additional $50 million of our common stock under the 2017 Repurchase Program, increasing the aggregate authorization from $100 million to $150 million. Purchases of common stock pursuant to the 2017 Repurchase Program may be made in open market transactions effected through a broker-dealer at prevailing market prices, in block trades, or by other means in accordance with federal securities laws, including pursuant to any trading plan that may be adopted in accordance with Rule 10b5-1 of the Exchange Act. We are not obligated under the 2017 Repurchase Program to repurchase any specific number or amount of shares of common stock, and we may modify, suspend or discontinue the program at any time. Our management will determine the timing and amount of repurchase in its discretion based on a variety of factors, such as the market price of our common stock, corporate requirements, general market economic conditions and legal requirements. For the three months ended June 30, 2017, we repurchased and retired 7,979,618 shares of our common stock under this program at a weighted average price of $12.43 per share for a total cost of $99.2 million. For the six months ended June 30, 2017, we repurchased and retired 8,019,005 shares of common stock under this program at a weighted average price of $12.43 per share, for a total cost of $99.7 million.

- 45 -

Covenant Compliance

Under our Credit Facility, we are required to comply with certain financial covenants, including, but not limited to, those set forth in the table below (dollars in thousands):



	Actual at June 30,			Covenant Requirement at June 30,
Financial Covenants	2017			2017
Consolidated Tangible Net Worth	$	1,616,726		$	1,116,357
(Not less than $1.1 billion plus 50% of net income and 50% of the net proceeds from equity offerings after March 31, 2017)
Leverage Test	48.6		%	≤55%
(Not to exceed 55%)
Interest Coverage Test	3.7			≥1.5
(Not less than 1.5:1.0)

As of June 30, 2017, we were in compliance with all of these financial covenants.

Leverage Ratios

We believe that our leverage ratios provide useful information to the users of our financial statements regarding our financial position and cash and debt management. The ratio of debt-to-capital and the ratio of net debt-to-net capital are calculated as follows (dollars in thousands):



	June 30, 2017			December 31, 2016
Unsecured revolving credit facility	$	150,000		$	200,000
Seller financed loans	—			13,726
Senior Notes	1,467,861			1,168,307
Total debt	1,617,861			1,382,033
Stockholders’ equity	1,777,954			1,829,447
Total capital	$	3,395,815		$	3,211,480
Ratio of debt-to-capital⁽¹⁾	47.6		%	43.0		%

Total debt	$	1,617,861		$	1,382,033
Less: Cash and cash equivalents	(114,945		)	(208,657		)
Net debt	1,502,916			1,173,376
Stockholders’ equity	1,777,954			1,829,447
Net capital	$	3,280,870		$	3,002,823
Ratio of net debt-to-net capital⁽²⁾	45.8		%	39.1		%

__________


⁽¹⁾	The ratio of debt-to-capital is computed as the quotient obtained by dividing total debt by the sum of total debt plus equity.

⁽²⁾

The ratio of net debt-to-net capital is a non-GAAP measure and is computed as the quotient obtained by dividing net debt (which is total debt less cash and cash equivalents) by the sum of net debt plus equity. The most directly comparable GAAP financial measure is the ratio of debt-to-capital. We believe the ratio of net debt-to-net capital is a relevant financial measure for investors to understand the leverage employed in our operations and as an indicator of our ability to obtain financing. See the table above reconciling this non-GAAP financial measure to the ratio of debt-to-capital. Because the ratio of net debt-to-net capital is not calculated in accordance with GAAP, it may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for, or superior to, financial measures prepared in accordance with GAAP.

- 46 -

Cash Flows—Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2016

For the six months ended June 30, 2017 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2016, the comparison of cash flows is as follows:

•

Net cash used in operating activities increased by $34.5 million to $220.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, from $186.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016. The change was comprised of offsetting activity, including (i) a decrease in net income of $61.9 million in 2017 compared to the prior year period, offset by (ii) an increase in real estate inventory of $298.0 million in 2017 compared to an increase of $323.3 million in 2016, and (iii) other offsetting activity including changes in other assets, receivables, accounts payable and accrued expenses.


•	Net cash used in investing activities was $2.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $1.2 million for the prior year period in 2016. The increase in cash used in investing activities was due mainly to increased purchases of property and equipment and investments in unconsolidated entities.

•

Net cash provided by financing activities increased to $129.2 million for the six months ending June 30, 2017, from $90.4 million for the same period in the prior year. The change was primarily a result of higher net borrowings from debt of $236.3 million during the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $115.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016, offset by higher cash used for share repurchases of $99.7 million during the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $14.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016.

As of June 30, 2017, our cash and cash equivalents balance was $114.9 million.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations

In the ordinary course of business, we enter into land and lot option contracts in order to procure lots for the construction of our homes. We are subject to customary obligations associated with entering into contracts for the purchase of land and improved lots. These purchase contracts typically require a cash deposit and the purchase of properties under these contracts is generally contingent upon satisfaction of certain requirements by the sellers, including obtaining applicable property and development entitlements. We also utilize option contracts with land sellers as a method of acquiring land in staged takedowns, to help us manage the financial and market risk associated with land holdings, and to reduce the use of funds from our corporate financing sources. Option contracts generally require a non-refundable deposit for the right to acquire land and lots over a specified period of time at pre-determined prices. We generally have the right, at our discretion, to terminate our obligations under both purchase contracts and option contracts by forfeiting our cash deposit with no further financial responsibility to the land seller. As of June 30, 2017, we had $33.9 million of cash deposits, the majority of which are non-refundable, pertaining to land and lot option contracts and purchase contracts with an aggregate remaining purchase price of $423.5 million (net of deposits).

Our utilization of land and lot option contracts is dependent on, among other things, the availability of land sellers willing to enter into option takedown arrangements, the availability of capital to finance the development of optioned land and lots, general housing market conditions, and local market dynamics. Options may be more difficult to procure from land sellers in strong housing markets and are more prevalent in certain geographic regions.

As of June 30, 2017, we had $442.2 million of availability under our Credit Facility after considering the borrowing base provisions and outstanding letters of credit.

Inflation

Our operations can be adversely impacted by inflation, primarily from higher land, financing, labor, material and construction costs. In addition, inflation can lead to higher mortgage rates, which can significantly affect the affordability of mortgage financing to homebuyers. While we attempt to pass on cost increases to customers through increased prices, when weak housing market conditions exist, we are often unable to offset cost increases with higher selling prices.

- 47 -

Seasonality

Historically, the homebuilding industry experiences seasonal fluctuations in quarterly operating results and capital requirements. We typically experience the highest new home order activity during the first and second quarters of our fiscal year, although this activity is also highly dependent on the number of active selling communities, timing of new community openings and other market factors. Since it typically takes three to nine months to construct a new home, the number of homes delivered and associated home sales revenue typically increases in the third and fourth quarters of our fiscal year as new home orders sold earlier in the year convert to home deliveries. Because of this seasonality, home starts, construction costs and related cash outflows have historically been highest in the second and third quarters of our fiscal year, and the majority of cash receipts from home deliveries occur during the second half of the year. We expect this seasonal pattern to continue over the long-term, although it may be affected by volatility in the homebuilding industry.

Description of Projects and Communities under Development

The following table presents project information relating to each of our markets as of June 30, 2017 and includes information on current projects under development where we are building and selling homes.

- 48 -

Maracay Homes



County, Project, City	Year of First Delivery⁽¹⁾	Total Number of Lots⁽²⁾	Cumulative Homes Delivered as of June 30, 2017	Lots Owned as of June 30, 2017⁽³⁾	Backlog as of June 30, 2017⁽⁴⁾⁽⁵⁾	Homes Delivered for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2017	Sales Price Range (in thousands)⁽⁶⁾
Phoenix, Arizona
City of Buckeye:
Verrado Palisades	2015	63	49	14	8	16	$301 - $374
Verrado Victory	2015	98	36	62	15	6	$359 - $394
City of Chandler:
Sendera Place	2015	79	75	4	4	17	$277 - $324
Hawthorn Manor	2017	84	—	84	31	—	$511 - $553
City of Gilbert:
Marquis at Morrison Ranch	2016	66	54	12	9	18	$414 - $501
Artisan at Morrison Ranch	2016	105	54	51	23	19	$334 - $387
The Preserve at Adora Trails	2017	82	1	81	31	1	$402 - $445
Marathon Ranch	2018	63	—	63	—	—	$486 - $535
Annecy	2019	216	—	216	—	—	$276 - $309
Lakeview Trails	2019	92	—	92	—	—	$451 - $511
City of Goodyear:
Rio Paseo Villages	2018	117	—	117	—	—	$218 - $232
Rio Paseo Cottages	2018	93	—	93	—	—	$253 - $271
City of Mesa:
Kinetic Point at Eastmark	2013	80	77	3	—	2	$288 - $367
Lumiere Garden at Eastmark	2013	85	77	8	6	2	$332 - $409
Aileron Square at Eastmark	2016	58	38	20	17	14	$332 - $409
Curie Court at Eastmark	2016	106	43	63	19	13	$289 - $368
Palladium Point	2016	53	16	37	19	12	$316 - $385
The Vista at Granite Crossing	2018	37	—	37	—	—	$400 - $475
Town of Peoria:
The Reserve at Plaza del Rio	2013	162	158	4	3	23	$227 - $270
Maracay at Northlands	2014	90	90	—	—	13	$330 - $411
Legacy at The Meadows	2017	74	14	60	12	14	$404 - $430
Estates at The Meadows	2017	272	17	255	30	17	$463 - $537
Meadows Enclave	2018	126	—	126	—	—	$377 - $471
City of Phoenix:
Navarro Groves	2018	54	—	54	—	—	$390 - $435
Vistal	2019	204	—	204	—	—	$350 - $567
Town of Queen Creek:
The Preserve at Hastings Farms	2014	89	89	—	—	1	$300 - $385
Villagio	2013	135	135	—	—	6	$291 - $352
Phoenix, Arizona Total	2018	2,783	1,023	1,760	227	194	$365 - $523
Tucson, Arizona
Marana:
Tortolita Vistas	2014	55	50	5	5	9	$458 - $515
Oro Valley:
Rancho del Cobre	2014	68	61	7	3	6	$410 - $478
Desert Crest - Center Pointe Vistoso	2016	103	27	76	17	14	$255 - $300
The Cove - Center Pointe Vistoso	2016	83	30	53	16	12	$338 - $398
Summit N & S - Center Pointe Vistoso	2016	88	42	46	18	19	$391 - $426
The Pinnacle - Center Pointe Vistoso	2016	69	45	24	11	23	$446 - $478
Tucson:
Ranches at Santa Catalina	2016	34	12	22	14	6	$414 - $460
Tucson, Arizona Total		500	267	233	84	89
Maracay Total		3,283	1,290	1,993	311	283

- 49 -

Pardee Homes



County, Project, City	Year of First Delivery⁽¹⁾	Total Number of Lots⁽²⁾	Cumulative Homes Delivered as of June 30, 2017	Lots Owned as of June 30, 2017⁽³⁾	Backlog as of June 30, 2017⁽⁴⁾⁽⁵⁾	Homes Delivered for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2017	Sales Price Range (in thousands)⁽⁶⁾
California
San Diego County:
Casabella	2015	139	128	11	11	28	$900 - $1,000
Casavia	2017	83	31	52	28	31	$980 - $1,030
Artesana	2017	56	—	56	39	—	$1,680 - $1,910
Almeria	2017	80	—	80	10	—	$1,440 - $1,530
Olvera	2017	84	—	84	20	—	$1,310 - $1,410
Pacific Highlands Ranch Future	TBD	605	—	605	—	—	TBD
Olive Hill Estate	2016	37	30	7	4	14	$650 - $770
Sandstone (Castlerock)	2018	81	—	81	—	—	$630 - $660
Castlerock 47x90	2018	63	—	63	—	—	TBD
Lake Ridge (Castlerock)	2018	129	—	129	—	—	$700 - $780
Castlerock - 42x63	2018	142	—	142	—	—	TBD
Meadowood	TBD	844	—	844	—	—	$290 - $590
Parkview Condos	2016	73	73	—	—	37	$435 - $515
Luna	2017	96	11	85	41	11	$370 - $450
Azul	2017	121	23	98	37	23	$360 - $450
Ocean View Hills Future	2017	691	—	691	—	—	TBD
South Otay Mesa	TBD	893	—	893	—	—	TBD
Los Angeles County:
Aliento - Verano	2017	95	—	95	5	—	$540 - $640
Aliento - Arista	2017	112	—	112	28	—	$695 - $760
Aliento - 55x100	2018	94	—	94	—	—	TBD
Aliento - 70x100	2018	67	—	67	—	—	TBD
Skyline Ranch	TBD	1,260	—	1,260	—	—	$550 - $810
Riverside County:					—
Meadow Glen	2014	142	142	—	—	2	$350 - $410
Senterra	2016	82	43	39	21	18	$400 - $480
Vantage	2016	83	30	53	12	15	$360 - $390
Viewpoint	2016	75	44	31	18	26	$295 - $330
Overlook	2016	112	47	65	20	23	$310 - $340
Aura	2017	79	21	58	15	21	$340 - $370
Starling	2018	107	—	107	8	—	$400 - $420
Canyon Hills Future 70 x 115	2018	125	—	125	—	—	TBD
Tournament Hills Future	TBD	268	—	268	—	—	TBD
Northstar	2015	102	87	15	9	21	$320 - $340
Skycrest	2015	115	86	29	11	18	$360 - $390
Flagstone	2,016	79	44	35	10	10	$420 - $450
Lunetta	2016	89	82	7	5	27	$290 - $320
Elara	2016	215	48	167	49	28	$270 - $310
Daybreak	2017	139	—	139	—	—	$325 - $340
Cascade	2017	105	—	105	—	—	$296 - $312
Sundance Future	TBD	1,012	—	1,012	—	—	TBD
Avena	2017	84	—	84	—	—	$390 - $430
Tamarack	2017	84	—	84	—	—	$430 - $460
Manifee Heights	TBD	359	—	359	—	—	$375 - $450
Banning	TBD	4,318	—	4,318	—	—	TBD
Sacramento County:					—
Natomas	TBD	120	—	120	—	—	TBD
San Joaquin County:					—
Bear Creek	TBD	1,252	—	1,252	—	—	TBD
California Total		14,991	970	14,021	401	353

- 50 -



Nevada
Clark County:
LivingSmart Sandstone	2013	145	145	—	—	1	$228 - $255
North Peak	2015	171	83	88	17	26	$290 - $350
Castle Rock	2015	188	85	103	15	24	$340 - $430
Camino	2016	86	67	19	15	44	$255 - $270
Solano	2014	132	131	1	—	14	$300 - $335
Alterra	2014	47	47	—	—	2	$425 - $505
Bella Verdi	2015	57	49	8	—	2	$400 - $440
Escala	2016	154	30	124	12	11	$515 - $590
Montero	2016	74	28	46	13	20	$420 - $500
Strada	2,017	116	2	114	24	2	$405 - $440
POD 5-1/2-2 Future	2017	23		23	—	—	TBD
Meridian	2016	62	25	37	11	5	$590 - $680
Encanto	2016	51	19	32	7	8	$470 - $525
Luma	2017	71	—	71	—	—	$470 - $526
Encanto Townhomes	2018	70	—	70	—	—	TBD
Horizon Terrace	2014	165	118	47	10	24	$410 - $465
Horizon Valle Verde	2018	53	—	53	—	—	$450 - $470
Summerglen	2014	140	138	2	2	25	$300 - $305
Keystone	2017	70	8	62	12	7	$450 - $540
Cobalt	2017	107	—	107	—	—	$350 - $420
Axis	2017	78	—	78	8	—	$825 - $1,035
The Canyons at MacDonald Ranch - R	2017	22	—	22	—	—	$515 - $585
Pivot	2017	88	—	88	4	—	$420 - $450
Strada at Pivot	2017	27	—	27	2	—	$440 - $475
Nova Ridge	2018	108	—	108	—	—	$620 - $760
Tera Luna	2017	116	—	116	—	—	$540 - $590
Azul at Skye Canyon	2018	88	—	88	—	—	$425 - $465
Tule Springs	TBD	339	—	339	—	—	TBD
Commerce & Deer Springs	TBD	143	—	143	—	—	TBD
Nevada Total		2,991	975	2,016	152	215
Pardee Total		17,982	1,945	16,037	553	568

- 51 -

Quadrant Homes



County, Project, City	Year of First Delivery⁽¹⁾	Total Number of Lots⁽²⁾	Cumulative Homes Delivered as of June 30, 2017	Lots Owned as of June 30, 2017⁽³⁾	Backlog as of June 30, 2017⁽⁴⁾⁽⁵⁾	Homes Delivered for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2017	Sales Price Range (in thousands)⁽⁶⁾
Washington
Snohomish County:
Evergreen Heights, Monroe	2016	71	27	44	34	24	$452 - $553
The Grove at Canyon Park, Bothell	2017	60	5	55	41	5	$645 - $780
Greenstone Heights, Bothell	2017	41	—	41	7	—	$920 - $1,060
King County:
Copperwood, Renton	2016	46	44	2	2	23	$770 - $772
Viscaia, Bellevue	2017	18	—	18	16	—	$750 - $880
Trailside, Redmond	2017	9	2	7	—	2	$955 - $1,180
Vareze, Kirkland	2019	82	—	82	—	—	$625 - $880
Parkwood Terrace, Woodinville	2017	15	—	15	12	—	$759 - $960
Hazelwood Ridge, Newcastle	2017	30	—	30	27	—	$805 - $1,025
Inglewood Landing, Sammamish	2018	21	—	21	—	—	$1,000 - $1,300
Jacobs Landing, Issaquah	2017	20	—	20	—	—	$1,160 - $1,280
Kirkwood Terrace, Sammamish	2018	12	—	12	—	—	$1,725 - $2,026
English Landing P2, Redmond	2017	25	—	25	—	—	$1,050 - $1,315
English Landing P1, Redmond	2018	51	1	50	—	—	$1,079 - $1,342
Heathers Ridge South, Redmond	2017	8	1	7	7	1	$725 - $1,008
Cedar Landing, North Bend	2018	138	—	138	—	—	$635 - $785
Monarch Ridge, Sammamish	2018	59	—	59	—	—	$900 - $1,050
Ray Meadows, Redmond	2018	27	—	27	—	—	$1,059 - $1,209
Wynstone, Federal Way	TBD	4	—	4	—	—	TBD
Breva, Bellevue	2017	29	—	29	6	—	$783 - $900
Canton Crossing, Maple Valley	2017	51	—	51	7	—	$575 - $660
Aurea, Sammamish	2018	41	—	41	—	—	$655 - $845
Aldea, Newcastle	2018	129	—	129	—	—	$559 - $835
Pierce County:
The Enclave at Harbor Hill, Gig Harbor	2016	33	32	1	1	15	$515
Harbor Hill S-2, Gig Harbor	2017	41	—	41	—	—	$425 - $463
Harbor Hill S-5/6, Gig Harbor	2017	72	—	72	16	—	$453 - $503
Kitsap County:
Mountain Aire, Poulsbo	2016	145	59	86	25	30	$412 - $473
Closed Communities	N/A	—	—	—	—	27	N/A
Washington Total		1,278	171	1,107	201	127
Quadrant Total		1,278	171	1,107	201	127

- 52 -

Trendmaker Homes



County, Project, City	Year of First Delivery⁽¹⁾	Total Number of Lots⁽²⁾	Cumulative Homes Delivered as of June 30, 2017	Lots Owned as of June 30, 2017⁽³⁾	Backlog as of June 30, 2017⁽⁴⁾⁽⁵⁾	Homes Delivered for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2017	Sales Price Range (in thousands)⁽⁶⁾
Texas
Brazoria County:
Sedona Lakes, Pearland	2014	34	25	9	6	4	$415 - $458
Pomona, Manvel	2015	39	12	27	10	7	$360 - $455
Rise Meridiana	2016	26	11	15	5	10	$300 - $339
Fort Bend County:
Cross Creek Ranch 60', Fulshear	2013	35	12	23	3	8	$370 - $465
Cross Creek Ranch 65', Fulshear	2013	61	42	19	5	9	$429 - $488
Cross Creek Ranch 70', Fulshear	2013	94	67	27	2	7	$485 - $548
Cross Creek Ranch 80', Fulshear	2013	68	58	10	4	5	$551 - $666
Cross Creek Ranch 90', Fulshear	2013	27	18	9	6	5	$654 - $718
Villas at Cross Creek Ranch, Fulshear	2013	101	101	—	—	1	$454 - $496
Fulshear Run, Richmond	2016	37	7	30	5	6	$562 - $668
Harvest Green 75', Richmond	2015	21	15	6	2	6	$426 - $500
Sienna Plantation 85', Missouri City	2015	39	19	20	2	9	$546 - $645
Villas at Sienna South, Missouri City	2015	19	12	7	3	3	$383 - $407
Lakes of Bella Terra, Richmond	2013	109	105	4	1	4	$465 - $553
Villas at Aliana, Richmond	2013	117	95	22	3	8	$399 - $451
Riverstone 55', Sugar Land	2013	97	96	1	1	—	$437 - $467
Riverstone Avanti at Avalon 100', Sugar Land	2015	5	4	1	1	—	$1,197
Harris County:
Towne Lake Living Views, Cypress	2013	122	122	—	—	4	$468 - $561
The Groves, Humble	2015	68	38	30	4	9	$323 - $524
Lakes of Creekside	2015	21	6	15	—	5	$512 - $585
Bridgeland '80, Cypress	2015	111	92	19	7	8	$522 - $611
Bridgeland Patio, Cypress	2017	26	6	20	9	5	$344 - $413
Elyson 70', Cypress	2017	16	2	14	5	2	$454 - $496
Hidden Arbor, Cypress	2015	129	53	76	30	29	$352 - $586
Clear Lake, Houston	2015	770	232	538	42	38	$350 - $650
Montgomery County:
Woodtrace, Woodtrace	2014	38	26	12	2	8	$438 - $480
Northgrove, Tomball	2015	25	5	20	1	4	$454 - $498
Bender's Landing Estates, Spring	2014	104	47	57	8	8	$468 - $563
The Woodlands, Creekside Park	2015	96	23	73	12	9	$410 - $624
Waller County:
Cane Island, Katy	2015	23	16	7	1	2	$525 - $634
Lakehouse	TBD	350	—	350	—	—	TBD
Williamson County:
Crystal Falls	2016	29	6	23	6	3	$460 - $535
Rancho Sienna 60'	2017	21	1	20	2	1	$370 - $422
Hays County:
Belterra 60', Austin	2017	22	3	19	3	3	$375 - $466
Belterra 80', Austin	2016	38	11	27	5	5	$535 - $603
Headwaters, Dripping Springs	2017	28	2	26	7	2	$420 - $479
Other:
Avanti Custom Homes	2007	125	123	2	1	2	$480 - $856
Texas Total		3,091	1,513	1,578	204	239
Trendmaker Homes Total		3,091	1,513	1,578	204	239

- 53 -

TRI Pointe Homes



County, Project, City	Year of First Delivery⁽¹⁾	Total Number of Lots⁽²⁾	Cumulative Homes Delivered as of June 30, 2017	Lots Owned as of June 30, 2017⁽³⁾	Backlog as of June 30, 2017⁽⁴⁾⁽⁵⁾	Homes Delivered for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2017	Sales Price Range (in thousands)⁽⁶⁾
Southern California
Orange County:
Messina, Irvine	2014	59	50	5	1	—	$1,565 - $1,710
Messina II, Irvine	2016	43	28	15	11	8	$1,515 - $1,695
Aria, Rancho Mission Viejo	2016	87	66	21	12	18	$623 - $683
Aria II, Rancho Mission Viejo	2017	64	—	64	5	—	$623 - $683
Aubergine, Rancho Mission Viejo	2016	66	31	35	20	8	$973 - $1,117
Aubergine II, Rancho Mission Viejo	2017	57	—	57	—	—	TBD
Carlisle 10-Pack Garden Court, Irvine	2017	74	—	74	24	—	$670 - $778
Sterling Row Townhomes, Irvine	2017	96	—	96	19	—	$572 - $739
Varenna at Orchard Hills, Irvine	2016	71	18	26	13	10	$1,165 - $1,235
Alston, Anaheim	2017	75	—	75	10	—	$795 - $850
StrataPointe, Buena Park	2017	149	—	149	40	—	$502 - $637
Riverside County:
Kite Ridge, Riverside	2014	87	85	2	2	23	$472 - $500
Serrano Ridge at Sycamore Creek, Riverside	2015	87	86	1	—	23	$403 - $429
Terrassa Court, Corona	2015	94	35	59	28	22	$414 - $464
Terrassa Villas, Corona	2015	52	14	38	—	8	$453 - $495
Los Angeles County:
Grayson at Five Knolls, Santa Clarita	2015	119	72	47	25	23	$552 - $583
Garvey Square, El Monte	2017	102	—	102	—	—	$446 - $537
Bradford @ Rosedale, Azusa	2017	52	—	27	9	—	$816 - $861
Golden Valley/ Lucera at Aliento	2017	67	—	67	16	—	$622 - $645
Golden Valley/Tierno at Aliento	2017	63	—	63	23	—	$667 - $695
San Bernardino County:
Sedona at Parkside, Ontario	2015	152	125	27	21	33	$405 - $443
Kensington at Park Place, Ontario	2015	67	66	1	1	21	$492 - $524
St. James at Park Place, Ontario	2015	57	51	6	—	—	$488 - $508
St. James II at Park Place, Ontario	2017	68	15	53	36	15	$493 - $513
Ventura County:
The Westerlies, Oxnard	2015	116	74	42	33	29	$430 - $547
Southern California Total		2,024	816	1,152	349	241
Northern California
Contra Costa County:
Berkshire at Barrington, Brentwood	2014	89	86	3	1	—	$508 - $587
Hawthorne at Barrington, Brentwood	2014	105	102	3	—	8	$572 - $620
Marquette at Barrington, Brentwood	2015	90	60	30	6	16	$480 - $730
Wynstone at Barrington, Brentwood	2017	92	3	89	23	3	$480 - $634
Penrose at Barrington, Brentwood	2016	34	34	—	—	14	$508 - $587
Santa Clara County:
Derose, Morgan Hill	2018	65	—	65	—	—	$600 - $820
Solano County:
Redstone, Vacaville	2015	141	75	66	24	15	$459 - $533
Green Valley-Lewis, Fairfield	2018	91	—	91	—	—	$499 - $535
Green Valley-Westgate, Fairfield	2018	56	—	56	—	—	$545 - $585
San Joaquin County:
Ventana, Tracy	2015	93	77	16	9	21	$457 - $557
Sundance, Mountain House	2015	113	89	24	18	15	$595 - $675
Sundance II, Mountain House	2018	138	—	138	—	—	$595 - $675
Alameda County:

- 54 -



Cadence, Alameda Landing	2015	91	68	23	16	6	$1,122 - $1,339
Linear, Alameda Landing	2015	106	64	42	8	—	$764 - $1,020
Symmetry, Alameda Landing	2016	56	35	21	11	9	$865 - $950
Commercial, Alameda Landing		2	—	2	—	—	$620
Parasol, Fremont	2016	39	35	4	—	11	$770 - $1,050
Blackstone at the Cannery, Hayward SFA	2016	105	32	73	30	8	$611 - $711
Blackstone at the Cannery, Hayward SFD	2016	52	36	16	6	17	$709 - $769
Coopers Place, Livermore	2017	31	—	31	8	—	$660 - $670
Slate at Jordan Ranch, Dublin	2017	56	—	56	7	—	$1,025 - $1,144
Onyx at Jordan Ranch, Dublin	2017	105	—	105	1	—	$885 - $945
Jordan Ranch II, Dublin	2018	45	—	45	—	—	$855 - $1,035
Mission Stevenson, Fremont	2018	77	—	77	—	—	$675 - $965
Palm Avenue, Fremont	2018	31	—	31	—	—	$2,030 - $2,175
Pleasant Hill	2018	44	—	44	—	—	TBD
Northern California Total		1,947	796	1,151	168	143
California Total		3,971	1,612	2,303	517	384
Colorado
Douglas County:
Terrain 4000 Series, Castle Rock	2013	149	147	2	—	5	$358 - $411
Terrain 3500 Series, Castle Rock	2015	67	64	3			$327 - $350
Terrain Ravenwood Village (3500)	2017	157	—	88	2	—	$379 - $426
Terrain Ravenwood Village (4000)	2017	100	—	38	—	—	$400 - $463
Jefferson County:
Leyden Rock 5000 Series, Arvada	2015	67	67	—	—	3	$454 - $509
Candelas 6000 Series, Arvada	2,015	76	37	39	21	16	$534 - $671
Candelas 3500 Series, Arvada	2,016	97	18	79	13	14	$405 - $467
Candelas 5000 Series, Arvada	2,017	62	—	62	8	—	$499 - $554
Crown Pointe, Westminster	2,018	64	—	64	—	—	$415 - $482
Larimer County:
Centerra 5000 Series, Loveland	2015	79	54	25	16	15	$411 - $469
Arapahoe County:
Whispering Pines, Aurora	2015	115	12	103	22	9	$572 - $648
Adams County:
Amber Creek, Thornton	2017	121	6	115	14	5	$386 - $468
Colorado Total		1,154	405	618	96	67
TRI Pointe Total		5,125	2,017	2,921	613	451

- 55 -

Winchester Homes



County, Project, City	Year of First Delivery⁽¹⁾	Total Number of Lots⁽²⁾	Cumulative Homes Delivered as of June 30, 2017	Lots Owned as of June 30, 2017⁽³⁾	Backlog as of June 30, 2017⁽⁴⁾⁽⁵⁾	Homes Delivered for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2017	Sales Price Range (in thousands)⁽⁶⁾
Maryland
Anne Arundel County:
Two Rivers Townhomes, Crofton	2017	36	—	36	12	—	$440 - $520
Two Rivers Cascades SFD, Crofton	2017	2	—	2	—	—	TBD
Watson's Glen, Millersville	2015	103	4	99	—	—	Closed
Frederick County:
Landsdale, Monrovia		—
Landsdale SFD	2015	222	54	168	30	14	$490 - $592
Landsdale Townhomes	2015	100	31	69	7	5	$315 - $373
Landsdale TND Neo SFD	2015	77	20	57	6	6	$440 - $473
Montgomery County:
Cabin Branch, Clarksburg:
Cabin Branch SFD	2014	359	110	249	35	19	$480 - $745
Cabin Branch Avenue Townhomes	TBD	121	—	121	5	—	$433 - $530
Cabin Branch Townhomes	2014	507	168	339	34	37	$389 - $432
Preserve at Stoney Spring	N/A	5	—	5	—	—	N/A
Poplar Run, Silver Spring:
Poplar Run SFD	2010	305	264	41	20	15	$435 - $781
Poplar Run Single Family Neos	2016	29	22	7	7	7	$545 - $635
Potomac Highlands, Potomac	2017	23	1	22	5	1	$1,191 - $1,289
Glenmont MetroCenter, Silver Spring	2016	171	17	154	10	10	$455 - $538
Twinbrook Metro, Rockville	2018	61	—	61	—	—	TBD
Closed Communities	N/A	—	—	—	—	1
Maryland Total		2,121	691	1,430	171	115
Virginia
Fairfax County:
Stuart Mill & Timber Lake, Oakton	2014	14	8	6	4	1	$1,363 - $1,675
Stuart Mill -Lots for Sale, Oakton	N/A	5	—	5	—	—	N/A
Prince William County:
Villages of Piedmont, Haymarket	2015	168	69	99	29	20	$370 - $431
Loudoun County:
Brambleton, Ashburn:
English Manor Villas	2014	58	57	1	—	8	$495 - $545
West Park SFD	2018	6	—	6	—	—	TBD
Vistas at Lansdowne, Lansdowne	2015	120	45	75	15	7	$569 - $670
Westgrove, Fairfax	2018	24	—	24	—	—	TBD
Willowsford Grant II, Aldie	2017	24	3	21	7	3	$1,200 - $1,326
Willowsford Greens, Aldie	2014	33	33	—	—	3	Closed
Willowsford Greens	N/A	5	—	5	—	—	N/A
Closed Communities	N/A	—	—	—	—	4
Virginia Total		457	215	242	55	46
Winchester Total		2,578	906	1,672	226	161

Combined Company Total		33,337	7,842	25,308	2,108	1,829

__________


⁽¹⁾	Year of first delivery for future periods is based upon management’s estimates and is subject to change.


⁽²⁾	The number of homes to be built at completion is subject to change, and there can be no assurance that we will build these homes.


⁽³⁾	Owned lots as of June 30, 2017 include owned lots in backlog as of June 30, 2017.


⁽⁴⁾	Backlog consists of homes under sales contracts that had not yet been delivered, and there can be no assurance that delivery of sold homes will occur.

- 56 -


⁽⁵⁾	Of the total homes subject to pending sales contracts that have not been delivered as of June 30, 2017, 1,386 homes are under construction, 239 homes have completed construction, and 483 homes have not started construction.


⁽⁶⁾	Sales price range reflects base price only and excludes any lot premium, buyer incentives and buyer-selected options, which may vary from project to project. Sales prices for homes required to be sold pursuant to affordable housing requirements are excluded from sales price range. Sales prices reflect current pricing and might not be indicative of past or future pricing.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based on our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contained elsewhere in this report, which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. Our condensed notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements contained elsewhere in this report and the audited financial statements contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 describe the significant accounting policies essential to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements. The preparation of our financial statements requires our management to make estimates, judgments and assumptions. We believe that the estimates, judgments and assumptions that we have used are appropriate and correct based on information available at the time they were made. These estimates, judgments and assumptions can affect our reported assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported revenues and expenses during the period presented. If there is a material difference between these estimates, judgments and assumptions and actual facts, our financial statements may be affected.

In many cases, the accounting treatment of a particular transaction is specifically dictated by GAAP and does not require our judgment in its application. There are areas in which our judgment in selecting among available alternatives would not produce a materially different result, but there are some areas in which our judgment in selecting among available alternatives would produce a materially different result. See the condensed notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements that contain additional information regarding our accounting policies and other disclosures.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

See Note 1, Organization, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, to the accompanying condensed notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.


Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

We are exposed to market risks related to fluctuations in interest rates on our outstanding debt. We did not utilize swaps, forward or option contracts on interest rates or commodities, or other types of derivative financial instruments as of or during the six months ended June 30, 2017. We did not enter into during the six months ended June 30, 2017, and currently do not hold, derivatives for trading or speculative purposes.


Item 4.	Controls and Procedures

We have established disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that information we are required to disclose in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer (the “Principal Executive Officer”) and Chief Financial Officer (the “Principal Financial Officer”), as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Under the supervision and with the participation of senior management, including our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, we evaluated our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Exchange Act. Based on this evaluation, our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2017.

Our management, including our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, has evaluated our internal control over financial reporting to determine whether any change occurred during the six months ended June 30, 2017 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. Based on that evaluation, there has been no such change during the six months ended June 30, 2017.

- 57 -

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION


Item 1.	Legal Proceedings

The information required with respect to this item can be found under Note 13, Commitments and Contingencies-Legal Matters, of the accompanying condensed notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and is incorporated by reference into this Item 1.


Item 1A.	Risk Factors

See Part I, Item 1A “Risk Factors,” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016. If any of the risks discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K or Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q occur, our business, prospects, liquidity, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected, in which case the trading price of our common stock could decline significantly and you could lose all or a part of your investment.


Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

On February 28, 2017, we announced that our board of directors approved the 2017 Repurchase Program, authorizing the repurchase of shares of common stock with an aggregate value of up to $100 million through March 31, 2018. On July 25, 2017 our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to an additional $50 million of our common stock under the 2017 Repurchase Program, increasing the aggregate authorization from $100 million to $150 million. Purchases of common stock pursuant to the 2017 Repurchase Program may be made in open market transactions effected through a broker-dealer at prevailing market prices, in block trades, or by other means in accordance with federal securities laws, including pursuant to any trading plan that may be adopted in accordance with Rule 10b5-1 of the Exchange Act. We are not obligated under the 2017 Repurchase Program to repurchase any specific number or amount of shares of common stock, and we may modify, suspend or discontinue the program at any time. Our management will determine the timing and amount of repurchase in its discretion based on a variety of factors, such as the market price of our common stock, corporate requirements, general market economic conditions and legal requirements.

During the three months ended June 30, 2017, we repurchased and retired the following shares pursuant to our 2017 Repurchase Program:



	Total number of shares purchased	Average price paid per share		Total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced program	Approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the program ⁽¹⁾
April 1, 2017 to April 30, 2017	1,166,557	$	12.35	1,166,557	$	85,103,380
May 1, 2017 to May 31, 2017	2,005,200	$	12.37	2,005,200	$	60,303,999
June 1, 2017 to June 30, 2017	4,807,861	$	12.48	4,807,861	$	303,199
Total	7,979,618	$	12.43	7,979,618

__________

⁽¹⁾ During the three months ended June 30, 2017, there was an aggregate of 7,979,618 shares of our common stock repurchased for $99,204,683.

- 58 -


Item 6.	Exhibits



Exhibit Number		Exhibit Description

3.1		Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of TRI Pointe Group, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K (filed July 7, 2015))

3.2		Amended and Restated Bylaws of TRI Pointe Group, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (filed October 27, 2016))

4.1		Specimen Common Stock Certificate of TRI Pointe Group, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (filed Dec. July 7, 2015))

4.2		Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 8, 2017, among TRI Pointe Group, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K (filed June 8, 2017))

4.3		Form of 5.25% Senior Note due 2027 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K (filed June 8, 2017))

10.1		Modification Agreement, dated as of June 20, 2017, among TRI Pointe Group, Inc., U.S. Bank National Association, d/b/a Housing Capital Company, and the lenders party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K (filed June 20, 2017))

10.2		Underwriting Agreement, dated as of June 5, 2017, among TRI Pointe Group, Inc. and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, as representative of the several underwriters named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K (filed June 8, 2017))

31.1		Chief Executive Officer Section 302 Certification of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2		Chief Financial Officer Section 302 Certification of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1		Chief Executive Officer Section 906 Certification of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.2		Chief Financial Officer Section 906 Certification of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

101		The following materials from TRI Pointe Group, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the six months ended June 30, 2017, formatted in eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iv) Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows, and (v) Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statement.

- 59 -

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



	TRI Pointe Group, Inc.

	By:	/s/ Douglas F. Bauer
		Douglas F. Bauer
		Chief Executive Officer
	By:	/s/ Michael D. Grubbs
		Michael D. Grubbs
Date: July 26, 2017		Chief Financial Officer

- 60 -

Tri Pointe Homes - 10-Q quarterly report FY2017 Q2

What is the market capitalization of a company?

DISCLAIMER

Contact

Links