UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2015
OR
¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
Commission File Number 1-11758
(Exact Name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
1585 Broadway
New York, NY 10036
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
36-3145972
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
(212) 761-4000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large Accelerated Filer x
Non-Accelerated Filer ¨
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
As of October 30, 2015, there were 1,936,223,959 shares of the Registrants Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, outstanding.
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
For the quarter ended September 30, 2015
Part IFinancial Information
Item 1.
Financial Statements (unaudited)
Condensed Consolidated Statements of IncomeThree and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 and 2014
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive IncomeThree and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 and 2014
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial ConditionSeptember 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Total EquityNine Months Ended September 30, 2015 and 2014
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash FlowsNine Months Ended September 30, 2015 and 2014
1. Introduction and Basis of Presentation
2. Significant Accounting Policies
3. Fair Values
4. Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
5. Investment Securities
6. Collateralized Transactions
7. Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses
8. Equity Method Investments
9. Deposits
10. Long-Term Borrowings and Other Secured Financings
11. Commitments, Guarantees and Contingencies
12. Variable Interest Entities and Securitization Activities
13. Regulatory Requirements
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Item 4.
Controls and Procedures
Financial Data Supplement (unaudited)
Part IIOther Information
Legal Proceedings
Item 2.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Item 5.
Other Information
Item 6.
Exhibits
AVAILABLE INFORMATION
Morgan Stanley files annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC). You may read and copy any document we file with the SEC at the SECs public reference room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for information on the public reference room. The SEC maintains an internet site that contains annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy and information statements and other information that issuers (including Morgan Stanley) file electronically with the SEC. Morgan Stanleys electronic SEC filings are available to the public at the SECs internet site, www.sec.gov.
Morgan Stanleys internet site is www.morganstanley.com. You can access Morgan Stanleys Investor Relations webpage at www.morganstanley.com/about-us-ir. Morgan Stanley makes available free of charge, on or through its Investor Relations webpage, its proxy statements, Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. Morgan Stanley also makes available, through its Investor Relations webpage, via a link to the SECs internet site, statements of beneficial ownership of Morgan Stanleys equity securities filed by its directors, officers, 10% or greater shareholders and others under Section 16 of the Exchange Act.
Morgan Stanley has a Corporate Governance webpage. You can access information about Morgan Stanleys corporate governance atwww.morganstanley.com/about-us-governance. Morgan Stanley posts the following on its Corporate Governance webpage:
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation;
Amended and Restated Bylaws;
Charters for its Audit Committee; Operations and Technology Committee; Compensation, Management Development and Succession Committee; Nominating and Governance Committee; and Risk Committee;
Corporate Governance Policies;
Policy Regarding Communication with the Board of Directors;
Policy Regarding Director Candidates Recommended by Shareholders;
Policy Regarding Corporate Political Activities;
Policy Regarding Shareholder Rights Plan;
Code of Ethics and Business Conduct;
Code of Conduct; and
Integrity Hotline information.
Morgan Stanleys Code of Ethics and Business Conduct applies to all directors, officers and employees, including its Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Deputy Chief Financial Officer. Morgan Stanley will post any amendments to the Code of Ethics and Business Conduct and any waivers that are required to be disclosed by the rules of either the SEC or the New York Stock Exchange LLC (NYSE) on its internet site. You can request a copy of these documents, excluding exhibits, at no cost, by contacting Investor Relations, 1585 Broadway, New York, NY 10036 (212-761-4000). The information on Morgan Stanleys internet site is not incorporated by reference into this report.
Part IFinancial Information.
MORGAN STANLEY
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income
(dollars in millions, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)
Revenues:
Investment banking
Trading
Investments
Commissions and fees
Asset management, distribution and administration fees
Other
Total non-interest revenues
Interest income
Interest expense
Net interest
Net revenues
Non-interest expenses:
Compensation and benefits
Occupancy and equipment
Brokerage, clearing and exchange fees
Information processing and communications
Marketing and business development
Professional services
Total non-interest expenses
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
Provision for income taxes
Income from continuing operations
Discontinued operations:
Income (loss) from discontinued operations before income taxes
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
Net income
Net income applicable to nonredeemable noncontrolling interests
Net income applicable to Morgan Stanley
Preferred stock dividends and other
Earnings applicable to Morgan Stanley common shareholders
Earnings per basic common share:
Earnings per basic common share
Earnings per diluted common share:
Earnings per diluted common share
Dividends declared per common share
Average common shares outstanding:
Basic
Diluted
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(dollars in millions)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Foreign currency translation adjustments(1)
Change in net unrealized gains (losses) on available for sale securities(2)
Pension, postretirement and other(3)
Total other comprehensive income (loss)
Comprehensive income
Other comprehensive income (loss) applicable to nonredeemable noncontrolling interests
Comprehensive income applicable to Morgan Stanley
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition
(dollars in millions, except share data)
Assets
Cash and due from banks ($13 and $45 at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively, related to consolidated variable interest entities, generally not available to the Company)
Interest bearing deposits with banks
Cash deposited with clearing organizations or segregated under federal and other regulations or requirements ($165 and $149 at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively, related to consolidated variable interest entities, generally not available to the Company)
Trading assets, at fair value ($129,632 and $127,342 were pledged to various parties at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively) ($834 and $966 at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively, related to consolidated variable interest entities, generally not available to the Company)
Investment securities (includes $61,159 and $69,216 at fair value at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively)
Securities received as collateral, at fair value
Securities purchased under agreements to resell (includes $809 and $1,113 at fair value at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively)
Securities borrowed
Customer and other receivables
Loans:
Held for investment (net of allowances of $173 and $149 at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively)
Held for sale
Other investments ($364 and $467 at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively, related to consolidated variable interest entities, generally not available to the Company)
Premises, equipment and software costs (net of accumulated depreciation of $6,906 and $6,219 at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively) ($187 and $191 at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively, related to consolidated variable interest entities, generally not available to the Company)
Goodwill
Intangible assets (net of accumulated amortization of $2,050 and $1,824 at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively) (includes $5 and $6 at fair value at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively)
Other assets ($57 and $59 at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively, related to consolidated variable interest entities, generally not available to the Company)
Total assets
Liabilities
Deposits
Short-term borrowings (includes $1,768 and $1,765 at fair value at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively)
Trading liabilities, at fair value
Obligation to return securities received as collateral, at fair value
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase (includes $597 and $612 at fair value at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively)
Securities loaned
Other secured financings (includes $3,450 and $4,504 at fair value at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively) ($456 and $348 at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively, related to consolidated variable interest entities, generally non-recourse to the Company)
Customer and other payables
Other liabilities and accrued expenses ($3 and $72 at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively, related to consolidated variable interest entities, generally non-recourse to the Company)
Long-term borrowings (includes $31,387 and $31,774 at fair value at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively)
Total liabilities
Commitments and contingent liabilities (see Note 11)
Equity
Morgan Stanley shareholders equity:
Preferred stock (see Note 14)
Common stock, $0.01 par value:
Shares authorized: 3,500,000,000 at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014;
Shares issued: 2,038,893,979 at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014;
Shares outstanding: 1,938,069,312 and 1,950,980,142 at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively
Additional paid-in capital
Retained earnings
Employee stock trusts
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
Common stock held in treasury, at cost, $0.01 par value:
Shares outstanding: 100,824,667 and 87,913,837 at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively
Common stock issued to employee stock trusts
Total Morgan Stanley shareholders equity
Nonredeemable noncontrolling interests
Total equity
Total liabilities and equity
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Total Equity
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 and 2014
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2014
Dividends
Shares issued under employee plans and related tax effects
Repurchases of common stock and employee tax withholdings
Net change in Accumulated other comprehensive income
Issuance of preferred stock
Deconsolidation of certain legal entities associated with a real estate fund
Other net decreases
BALANCE AT SEPTEMBER 30, 2015
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2013
BALANCE AT SEPTEMBER 30, 2014
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used for) operating activities:
Income from equity method investments
Compensation payable in common stock and options
Depreciation and amortization
Net gain on sale of available for sale securities
Impairment charges
Provision for credit losses on lending activities
Other operating activities
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Cash deposited with clearing organizations or segregated under federal and other regulations or requirements
Trading assets, net of Trading liabilities
Customer and other receivables and other assets
Customer and other payables and other liabilities
Securities purchased under agreements to resell
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from (payments for):
Premises, equipment and software, net
Business dispositions, net of cash disposed
Purchases, net of proceeds from sales
Originations, net of repayments
Investment securities:
Purchases
Proceeds from sales
Proceeds from paydowns and maturities
Other investing activities
Net cash used for investing activities
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Net proceeds from (payments for):
Short-term borrowings
Other secured financings
Proceeds from:
Excess tax benefits associated with stock-based awards
Derivatives financing activities
Issuance of preferred stock, net of issuance costs
Issuance of long-term borrowings
Payments for:
Long-term borrowings
Cash dividends
Net cash provided by financing activities
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents, at beginning of period
Cash and cash equivalents, at end of period
Cash and cash equivalents include:
Cash and due from banks
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Cash payments for interest were $1,456 million and $2,116 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
Cash payments for income taxes were $541 million and $620 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
The Company.
Morgan Stanley, a financial holding company, is a global financial services firm that maintains significant market positions in each of its business segmentsInstitutional Securities, Wealth Management and Investment Management. Morgan Stanley, through its subsidiaries and affiliates, provides a wide variety of products and services to a large and diversified group of clients and customers, including corporations, governments, financial institutions and individuals. Unless the context otherwise requires, the terms Morgan Stanley or the Company mean Morgan Stanley (the Parent) together with its consolidated subsidiaries.
For a summary of the activities of each of the Companys business segments, see Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 (the 2014 Form 10-K).
Basis of Financial Information.
The Companys condensed consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP), which require the Company to make estimates and assumptions regarding the valuations of certain financial instruments, the valuation of goodwill and intangible assets, compensation, deferred tax assets, the outcome of legal and tax matters, allowance for credit losses and other matters that affect its condensed consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. The Company believes that the estimates utilized in the preparation of its condensed consolidated financial statements are prudent and reasonable. Actual results could differ materially from these estimates. Intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Companys consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the 2014 Form 10-K. Certain footnote disclosures included in the 2014 Form 10-K have been condensed or omitted from the condensed consolidated financial statements as they are not required for interim reporting under U.S. GAAP. The condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments of a normal recurring nature that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for the fair presentation of the results for the interim period. The results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results for the entire year.
Consolidation.
The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, its wholly owned subsidiaries and other entities in which the Company has a controlling financial interest, including certain variable interest entities (VIE) (see Note 12). For consolidated subsidiaries that are less than wholly owned, the third-party holdings of equity interests are referred to as noncontrolling interests. The net income attributable to noncontrolling interests for such subsidiaries is presented as Net income (loss) applicable to nonredeemable noncontrolling interests in the Companys condensed consolidated statements of income. The portion of shareholders equity of such subsidiaries that is attributable to noncontrolling interests for such subsidiaries is presented as Nonredeemable noncontrolling interests, a component of total equity, in the Companys condensed consolidated statements of financial condition.
For a discussion of the Companys VIEs and its significant regulated U.S. and international subsidiaries, see Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements in the 2014 Form 10-K.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)(Continued)
Income Statement Presentation.
The Company, through its subsidiaries and affiliates, provides a wide variety of products and services to a large and diversified group of clients and customers, including corporations, governments, financial institutions and individuals. In connection with the delivery of the various products and services to clients, the Company manages its revenues and related expenses in the aggregate. As such, when assessing the performance of its businesses, primarily in its Institutional Securities business segment, the Company considers its trading, investment banking, commissions and fees, and interest income, along with the associated interest expense, as one integrated activity.
Statements of Cash Flows Presentation.
During 2015, the Company deconsolidated approximately $191 million in net assets previously attributable to nonredeemable noncontrolling interests that were related to a real estate fund sponsored by the Company. The deconsolidation resulted in a non-cash reduction of assets of $169 million. During 2014, the Company deconsolidated approximately $1.6 billion in net assets previously attributable to nonredeemable noncontrolling interests related to certain legal entities associated with another real estate fund sponsored by the Company. The deconsolidation resulted in a non-cash reduction of assets of $1.3 billion.
Global Oil Merchanting Business.
As a result of entering into a definitive agreement to sell the global oil merchanting unit of the commodities division to Castleton Commodities International LLC, on May 11, 2015, the Company recognized an impairment charge of $10 million and $69 million in Other revenues in the Companys condensed consolidated statements of income in the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively, to reduce the carrying amount of the unit to its estimated fair value less costs to sell. The Company closed the transaction on November 1, 2015. The transaction does not meet the criteria for discontinued operations and is not expected to have a material impact on the Companys financial results (see Note 3).
TransMontaigne.
On July 1, 2014, the Company completed the sale of its ownership stake in TransMontaigne Inc. (TransMontaigne), a U.S.-based oil storage, marketing and transportation company, as well as related physical inventory and the assumption of the Companys obligations under certain terminal storage contracts, to NGL Energy Partners LP. The gain on sale, which was included in continuing operations, was approximately $101 million for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2014.
CanTerm.
On March 27, 2014, the Company completed the sale of Canterm Canadian Terminals Inc. (CanTerm), a public storage terminal operator for refined products with two distribution terminals in Canada. As a result of the Companys level of continuing involvement with CanTerm, the results of CanTerm are reported as a component of continuing operations within the Companys Institutional Securities business segment for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. The gain on sale was approximately $45 million and is included in the condensed consolidated statement of income for the nine months ended September 30, 2014.
For a detailed discussion about the Companys significant accounting policies, see Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements in the 2014 Form 10-K.
During the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2015, other than the following, there were no significant updates made to the Companys significant accounting policies.
Accounting Standards Adopted.
Repurchase-to-Maturity Transactions, Repurchase Financings, and Disclosures.
In June 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the FASB) issued an accounting update requiring repurchase-to-maturity transactions be accounted for as secured borrowings consistent with the accounting for other repurchase agreements. This accounting update also requires separate accounting for a transfer of a financial asset executed contemporaneously with a repurchase agreement with the same counterparty (a repurchase financing), which will result in secured borrowing accounting for the repurchase agreement. This guidance became effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2015. In addition, new disclosures are required for sales of financial assets where the Company retains substantially all the exposure throughout the term and for the collateral pledged and remaining maturity of repurchase and securities lending agreements, which were effective January 1, 2015, and April 1, 2015, respectively. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Companys condensed consolidated financial statements. For further information on the adoption of this guidance, see Notes 6 and 12.
Disclosures for Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent).
In May 2015, the FASB issued an accounting update that removes the requirement to categorize within the fair value hierarchy all investments for which fair value is measured at net asset value (NAV) per share, or its equivalent using the practical expedient. The Company adopted this guidance retrospectively during the second quarter of 2015, as early adoption is permitted. For further information on the adoption of this guidance, see Note 3.
Goodwill.
The Company completed its annual goodwill impairment testing at July 1, 2015. The Companys impairment testing did not indicate any goodwill impairment, as each of the Companys reporting units with goodwill had a fair value that was substantially in excess of its carrying value. However, adverse market or economic events could result in impairment charges in future periods.
Fair Value Measurements.
For a description of the valuation techniques applied to the Companys major categories of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, see Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements in the 2014 Form 10-K.
The following fair value hierarchy tables present information about the Companys assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014.
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis.
At September 30, 2015.
Assets at Fair Value
Trading assets:
U.S. government and agency securities:
U.S. Treasury securities
U.S. agency securities
Total U.S. government and agency securities
Other sovereign government obligations
Corporate and other debt:
State and municipal securities
Residential mortgage-backed securities
Commercial mortgage-backed securities
Asset-backed securities
Corporate bonds
Collateralized debt and loan obligations
Loans and lending commitments
Other debt
Total corporate and other debt
Corporate equities(1)
Derivative and other contracts:
Interest rate contracts
Credit contracts
Foreign exchange contracts
Equity contracts
Commodity contracts
Netting(2)
Total derivative and other contracts
Investments:
Investments measured at NAV(3)
Principal investments
Total investments
Physical commodities
Total trading assets
AFS securities
Securities received as collateral
Intangible assets(4)
Total assets measured at fair value
Liabilities at Fair Value
Trading liabilities:
Lending commitments
Total trading liabilities
Obligation to return securities received as collateral
Total liabilities measured at fair value
AFSavailable for sale
At December 31, 2014.
Equity contracts(2)
Netting(3)
Investments measured at NAV(4)
Intangible assets(5)
Changes in Level 3 Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis.
The following tables present additional information about Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the quarters and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Level 3 instruments may be hedged with instruments classified in Level 1 and Level 2. As a result, the realized and unrealized gains (losses) for assets and liabilities within the Level 3 category presented in the tables below do not reflect the related realized and unrealized gains (losses) on hedging instruments that have been classified by the Company within the Level 1 and/or Level 2 categories.
Additionally, both observable and unobservable inputs may be used to determine the fair value of positions that the Company has classified within the Level 3 category. As a result, the unrealized gains (losses) during the period for assets and liabilities within the Level 3 category presented in the tables below may include changes in fair value during the period that were attributable to both observable (e.g., changes in market interest rates) and unobservable (e.g., changes in unobservable long-dated volatilities) inputs.
For assets and liabilities that were transferred into Level 3 during the period, gains (losses) are presented as if the assets or liabilities had been transferred into Level 3 at the beginning of the period; similarly, for assets and liabilities that were transferred out of Level 3 during the period, gains (losses) are presented as if the assets or liabilities had been transferred out at the beginning of the period.
Three Months Ended September 30, 2015.
Corporate equities
Net derivative and other contracts(4):
Total net derivative and other contracts
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015.
Equity contracts(5)
Three Months Ended September 30, 2014.
Collateralized debt obligations
Intangible assets
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014.
Quantitative Information about and Sensitivity of Significant Unobservable Inputs Used in Recurring Level 3 Fair Value Measurements.
The disclosures below provide information on the valuation techniques, significant unobservable inputs, and their ranges and averages for each major category of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis with a significant Level 3 balance. The level of aggregation and breadth of products cause the range of inputs to be wide and not evenly distributed across the inventory. Further, the range of unobservable inputs may differ across firms in the financial services industry because of diversity in the types of products included in each firms inventory. The following disclosures also include qualitative information on the sensitivity of the fair value measurements to changes in the significant unobservable inputs.
At September 30, 2015
Valuations Technique(s) /
Significant Unobservable Input(s) /
Sensitivity of the Fair Value toChanges in the Unobservable Inputs
Comparable bond price / (A)
Correlation model:
Credit correlation / (B)
Credit spread / (C)
Margin loan model:
Credit spread / (C)(D)
Volatility skew / (C)(D)
Discount rate / (C)(D)
Option model:
Volatility skew / (C)
Comparable pricing(3):
Comparable loan price / (A)
Discounted cash flow:
Implied weighted average cost of capital / (C)(D)
Capitalization rate / (C)(D)
Comparable pricing:
At the money volatility / (A)
Margin loan model(3):
Discount rate / (C)
Comparable price / (A)
Comparable equity price / (A)
Market approach:
EBITDA multiple / (A)(D)
Price / Book ratio / (A)(D)
Net derivative and othercontracts(4):
Interest rate volatility concentration liquidity multiple / (C)(D)
Interest rate - Foreign exchange correlation / (C)(D)
Interest rate volatility skew / (A)(D)
Interest rate quanto correlation / (A)(D)
Interest rate curve correlation / (C)(D)
Inflation volatility / (A)(D)
Interest rate - Inflationcorrelation / (A)(D)
Cash synthetic basis / (C)(D)
Comparable bond price / (C)(D)
Correlation model(3):
Foreign exchange contracts(6)
Interest rate curve / (A)(D)
Equity contracts(6)
At the money volatility / (A)(D)
Volatility skew / (A)(D)
Equity - Equity correlation / (C)(D)
Equity - Foreign exchange correlation / (A)(D)
Equity - Interest rate correlation / (C)(D)
Forward power price / (C)(D)
Commodity volatility / (A)(D)
Cross commodity correlation / (C)(D)
Exit multiple / (A)(D)
Equity discount rate / (C)(D)
Market approach(3):
Forward capacity price / (A)(D)
EBITDA multiple / (A)
Funding spread / (A)
Discounted cash flow(3):
Option model(3):
At the money volatility / (C)(D)
Equity - Equity correlation / (A)(D)
Equity - Foreign exchangecorrelation / (C)(D)
Equity alpha / (A)
Valuation Technique(s) / SignificantUnobservable Input(s) / Sensitivity ofthe Fair Value toChanges in the Unobservable Inputs
Corporate loan model:
Net asset value:
Discount to net asset value / (C)
Interest rate - Foreign exchange correlation / (A)(D)
Interest rate curve correlation / (A)(D)
Interest rate - Inflation correlation / (A)(D)
Foreign exchangecontracts(6)
Interest rate - Credit spread correlation / (A)(D)
Equity contracts(6)(7)
Equity - Foreign exchange correlation / (C)(D)
Equity discount rate / (C)
Price / Earnings ratio / (A)(D)
EBITDAEarnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization
Sensitivity of the fair value to changes in the unobservable inputs:
For a description of the Companys significant unobservable inputs included in the September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 tables above for all major categories of assets and liabilities, see Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements in the 2014 Form 10-K.
During the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2015, there were no significant updates made to the Companys significant unobservable inputs.
Fair Value of Investments that are Measured at Net Asset Value.
For a description of the Companys investments in private equity funds, real estate funds and hedge funds measured at fair value based on NAV, see Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements in the 2014 Form 10-K. The following tables present information solely about the Companys investments in private equity funds, real estate funds and hedge funds measured at fair value using the NAV per share, or its equivalent, at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014:
Private equity funds
Real estate funds
Hedge funds(1):
Long-short equity hedge funds
Fixed income/credit-related hedge funds
Event-driven hedge funds
Multi-strategy hedge funds
Total
Private Equity Funds and Real Estate Funds.
Investments in these funds generally are not redeemable due to the closed-ended nature of these funds. Instead, distributions from each fund will be received as the underlying investments of the funds are disposed and monetized. The following table presents information about the fair value of the funds estimated to be liquidated over time:
Fund Type
Hedge Funds.
Investments in hedge funds may be subject to initial period lock-up restrictions or gates. A hedge fund lock-up provision is a provision that provides that, during a certain initial period, an investor may not make a withdrawal from the fund. The purpose of a gate is to restrict the level of redemptions that an investor in a particular hedge fund can demand on any redemption date. The following table presents information about lock-up restrictions and gates by hedge fund type:
Hedge Fund Type
Long-short equity(1)(2)
Fixed income/credit-related(1)
Event-driven(1)
Multi-strategy(1)(2)
N/ANot Applicable.
Fair Value Option.
The Company elected the fair value option for certain eligible instruments that are risk managed on a fair value basis to mitigate income statement volatility caused by measurement basis differences between the elected instruments and their associated risk management transactions or to eliminate complexities of applying certain accounting models. The following table presents net gains (losses) due to changes in fair value for items measured at fair value pursuant to the fair value option election for the quarters and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively:
Three Months Ended September 30, 2015
Short-term borrowings(1)
Long-term borrowings(1)
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015
Three Months Ended September 30, 2014
Short-term borrowings(2)
Long-term borrowings(2)
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014
In addition to the amounts in the above table, as discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements in the 2014 Form 10-K, all of the instruments within Trading assets or Trading liabilities are measured at fair value, either through the election of the fair value option or as required by other accounting guidance. The amounts in the above table are included within Net revenues and do not reflect gains or losses on related hedging instruments, if any.
The Company hedges the economics of market risk for short-term and long-term borrowings (i.e., risks other than that related to the credit quality of the Company) as part of its overall trading strategy and manages the market risks embedded within the issuance by the related business unit as part of the business units portfolio. The gains and losses on related economic hedges are recorded in Trading revenues and largely offset the gains and losses on short-term and long-term borrowings attributable to market risk.
At September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, a breakdown of the short-term and long-term borrowings measured at fair value on a recurring basis by business unit responsible for risk-managing each borrowing is shown in the table below.
Business Unit
Interest rates
Credit and foreign exchange
Commodities
The following tables present information on the Companys short-term and long-term borrowings (primarily structured notes), and loans and lending commitments for which the fair value option was elected:
Gains (Losses) due to Changes in Instrument-Specific Credit Risk.
Short-term and long-term borrowings(1)
Loans and other debt(2)
Lending commitments(3)
Net Difference between Contractual Principal Amount and Fair Value.
Loans and other debt(1)
Loans 90 or more days past due and/or on nonaccrual status(1)(2)
Short-term and long-term borrowings(3)
The tables above exclude non-recourse debt from consolidated VIEs, liabilities related to failed sales of financial assets, pledged commodities and other liabilities that have specified assets attributable to them.
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Non-recurring Basis.
Certain assets and liabilities were measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis and are not included in the tables above. These assets and liabilities may include loans, other investments, premises, equipment and software costs, intangible assets and lending commitments.
The following tables present, by caption on the Companys condensed consolidated statements of financial condition, the fair value hierarchy for those assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis for which the Company recognized a non-recurring fair value adjustment for the quarters and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014.
Three Months and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015.
Assets:
Loans(3)
Other investments(4)
Premises, equipment and software costs(5)
Liabilities:
Other liabilities and accrued expenses(3)
Three Months and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014.
Other assets(5)
In addition to the table above, as a result of entering into an agreement to sell the global oil merchanting unit of the commodities division, the Company recognized an impairment charge of $10 million and $69 million in Other revenues in the Companys condensed consolidated statements of income in the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively, to reduce the carrying amount of the unit to its estimated fair value less costs to sell.
There were no significant liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis during the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2014.
Financial Instruments Not Measured at Fair Value.
The tables below present the carrying value, fair value and fair value hierarchy category of certain financial instruments that are not measured at fair value in the Companys condensed consolidated statements of financial condition. The tables below exclude certain financial instruments such as equity method investments and all non-financial assets and liabilities such as the value of the long-term relationships with our deposit customers.
For a further discussion of the Companys financial instruments not measured at fair value, see Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements in 2014 Form 10-K.
Financial Assets:
Investment securitiesHTM securities
Customer and other receivables(1)
Loans(2)
Financial Liabilities:
Customer and other payables(1)
HTMheld to maturity
The fair value of the Companys lending commitments, primarily related to corporate lending in the Companys Institutional Securities business segment, that are not carried at fair value at September 30, 2015 was $1,807 million, of which $1,544 million and $263 million would have been categorized in Level 2 and Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, respectively. The notional amount of these commitments was $109.8 billion.
The fair value of the Companys lending commitments, primarily related to corporate lending in the Companys Institutional Securities business segment, that are not carried at fair value at December 31, 2014 was $1,178 million, of which $928 million and $250 million would have been categorized in Level 2 and Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, respectively. The notional amount of these commitments was $86.8 billion.
The Company trades and makes markets globally in listed futures, over-the-counter (OTC) swaps, forwards, options and other derivatives referencing, among other things, interest rates, currencies, investment grade and non-investment grade corporate credits, loans, bonds, U.S. and other sovereign securities, emerging market bonds and loans, credit indices, asset-backed security indices, property indices, mortgage-related and other asset-backed securities, and real estate loan products. The Company uses these instruments for trading, foreign currency exposure management, and asset and liability management.
The Company manages its trading positions by employing a variety of risk mitigation strategies. These strategies include diversification of risk exposures and hedging. Hedging activities consist of the purchase or sale of positions in related securities and financial instruments, including a variety of derivative products (e.g., futures, forwards, swaps and options). The Company manages the market risk associated with its trading activities on a Company-wide basis, on a worldwide trading division level and on an individual product basis.
Offsetting of Derivative Instruments.
In connection with its derivative activities, the Company generally enters into master netting agreements and collateral agreements with its counterparties. For a further discussion of these agreements, see Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements in the 2014 Form 10-K. The following tables present information about the offsetting of derivative instruments and related collateral amounts. See information related to offsetting of certain collateralized transactions in Note 6.
Derivative assets
Bilateral OTC
Cleared OTC(3)
Exchange traded
Total derivative assets
Derivative liabilities
Total derivative liabilities
The Company incurs credit risk as a dealer in OTC derivatives. Credit risk with respect to derivative instruments arises from the failure of a counterparty to perform according to the terms of the contract. The Companys exposure to credit risk at any point in time is represented by the fair value of the derivative contracts reported as assets. The fair value of a derivative represents the amount at which the derivative could be exchanged in an orderly transaction between market participants and is further described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements in the 2014 Form 10-K and Note 3.
OTC Derivative ProductsTrading Assets.
The tables below present a summary by counterparty credit rating and remaining contract maturity of the fair value of OTC derivatives in a gain position at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014. Fair value is presented in the final column, net of collateral received (principally cash and U.S. government and agency securities):
Credit Rating(2)
AAA
AA
A
BBB
Non-investment grade
For a discussion of hedge accounting, fair value hedgesinterest rate risk and net investment hedges, see Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements in the 2014 Form 10-K.
Fair Value and Notional of Derivative Instruments.
The following tables summarize the fair value of derivative instruments designated as accounting hedges and the fair value of derivative instruments not designated as accounting hedges by type of derivative contract and the platform on which these instruments are traded or cleared on a gross basis. Fair values of derivative contracts in an asset position are included in Trading assets, and fair values of derivative contracts in a liability position are reflected in Trading liabilities in the Companys condensed consolidated statements of financial condition (see Note 3):
Derivatives designated as accounting hedges:
Total derivatives designated as accounting hedges
Derivatives not designated as accounting hedges(2):
Total derivatives not designated as accounting hedges
Total derivatives
Cash collateral netting
Counterparty netting
Derivatives not designated as accounting hedges(3):
At September 30, 2015, cash collateral payables of $3 million and at December 31, 2014, cash collateral receivables and payables of $21 million and $30 million, respectively, were not offset against certain contracts that did not meet the definition of a derivative. The Company had no cash collateral receivable at September 30, 2015 that was not offset against certain contracts that did not meet the definition of a derivative.
Derivatives Designated as Fair Value Hedges.
The following table presents gains (losses) reported on interest rate derivative instruments designated and qualifying as accounting hedges and the related hedged item as well as the hedge ineffectiveness included in Interest expense in the Companys condensed consolidated statements of income:
Product Type
Derivatives
Borrowings
Derivatives Designated as Net Investment Hedges.
The following table presents gains (losses) reported on derivative instruments designated and qualifying as accounting hedges:
Foreign exchange contracts(1)
Derivatives Not Designated as Accounting Hedges.
The following table summarizes gains (losses) on derivative instruments not designated as accounting hedges:
Other contracts
Total derivative instruments
The Company also has certain embedded derivatives that have been bifurcated from the related structured borrowings. Such derivatives are classified in Long-term borrowings and had a net fair value of $19 million and $10 million at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively, and a notional value of $2,069 million at both September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014. The Company recognized a loss of $6 million and a gain of $10 million related to changes in the fair value of its bifurcated embedded derivatives for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively. The Company recognized a gain of $5 million and a loss of $23 million related to changes in the fair value of its bifurcated embedded derivatives for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively.
Credit Risk-Related Contingencies.
In connection with certain OTC trading agreements, the Company may be required to provide additional collateral or immediately settle any outstanding liability balances with certain counterparties in the event of a credit rating downgrade of the Company. The following table presents the aggregate fair value of certain derivative contracts that contain credit risk-related contingent features that are in a net liability position for which the Company has posted collateral in the normal course of business.
Net derivative liabilities
Collateral posted
The additional collateral or termination payments which may be called in the event of a future credit rating downgrade vary by contract and can be based on ratings by either or both of Moodys Investors Service, Inc. (Moodys) and Standard & Poors Ratings Services (S&P). At September 30, 2015, for such OTC trading agreements, the future potential collateral amounts and termination payments that could be called or required by counterparties or exchange and clearing organizations in the event of one-notch or two-notch downgrade scenarios based on the relevant contractual downgrade triggers were as follows:
Incremental collateral or termination payments upon potential future ratings downgrade(1):
One-notch downgrade
Two-notch downgrade
Credit Derivatives and Other Credit Contracts.
The Company enters into credit derivatives, principally through credit default swaps, under which it receives or provides protection against the risk of default on a set of debt obligations issued by a specified reference entity or entities. A majority of the Companys counterparties are banks, broker-dealers, insurance and other financial institutions, and monoline insurers.
The tables below summarize the notional and fair value of protection sold and protection purchased through credit default swaps:
Single name credit default swaps
Index and basket credit default swaps
Tranched index and basket credit default swaps
The tables below summarize the credit ratings of the reference obligation and maturities of protection sold through credit default swaps and other credit contracts:
Credit Ratings of the Reference Obligation
Single name credit default swaps:
Index and basket credit default swaps:
Total credit default swaps sold
Other credit contracts(3)
Total credit derivatives and other credit contracts
Single Name Credit Default Swaps.
A credit default swap protects the buyer against the loss of principal on a bond or loan in case of a default by the issuer. The protection buyer pays a periodic premium (generally quarterly) over the life of the contract and is protected for the period. The Company in turn will have to perform under a credit default swap if a credit event as defined under the contract occurs. Typical credit events include bankruptcy, dissolution or insolvency of the referenced entity, failure to pay and restructuring of the obligations of the referenced entity. In order to provide an indication of the current payment status or performance risk of the credit default swaps, a breakdown by credit ratings is provided. Agency ratings, if available, are used for this purpose; otherwise the Companys internal ratings are used.
Index and Basket Credit Default Swaps.
Index and basket credit default swaps are products where credit protection is provided on a portfolio of single name credit default swaps. Generally, in the event of a default on one of the underlying names, the Company will have to pay a pro rata portion of the total notional amount of the credit default swap.
The Company also enters into tranched index and basket credit default swaps where credit protection is provided on a particular portion of the portfolio loss distribution. The most junior tranches cover initial defaults, and once losses exceed the notional of the tranche, they are passed on to the next most senior tranche in the capital structure.
In order to provide an indication of the current payment status or performance risk of the credit default swaps, a breakdown by the Companys internal credit ratings is provided. Effective January 1, 2015, the Company utilized its internal credit ratings as compared with December 31, 2014 where external agency ratings, if available, were utilized. The change in the rating methodology did not have a significant impact on investment grade versus non-investment grade classifications or the fair values of tranched and non-tranched index and basket products in the above table.
Credit Protection Sold through CLNs and CDOs.
The Company has invested in CLNs and CDOs, which are hybrid instruments containing embedded derivatives, in which credit protection has been sold to the issuer of the note. If there is a credit event of a reference entity underlying the instrument, the principal balance of the note may not be repaid in full to the Company.
Purchased Credit Protection with Identical Underlying Reference Obligations.
For single name credit default swaps and non-tranched index and basket credit default swaps, the Company has purchased protection with a notional amount of approximately $668 billion and $731 billion at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively, compared with a notional amount of approximately $721 billion and $805 billion at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively, of credit protection sold with identical underlying reference obligations. In order to identify purchased protection with the same underlying reference obligations, the notional amount for individual reference obligations within non-tranched indices and baskets was determined on a pro rata basis and matched off against single name and non-tranched index and basket credit default swaps where credit protection was sold with identical underlying reference obligations.
The purchase of credit protection does not represent the sole manner in which the Company risk manages its exposure to credit derivatives. The Company manages its exposure to these derivative contracts through a variety of risk mitigation strategies, which include managing the credit and correlation risk across single name, non-tranched indices and baskets, tranched indices and baskets, and cash positions. Aggregate market risk limits have been established for credit derivatives, and market risk measures are routinely monitored against these limits. The Company may also recover amounts on the underlying reference obligation delivered to the Company under credit default swaps where credit protection was sold.
The following tables present information about the Companys AFS securities, which are carried at fair value, and HTM securities, which are carried at amortized cost. The net unrealized gains or losses on AFS securities are reported on an after-tax basis as a component of Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (AOCI).
AFS debt securities:
U.S. agency securities(1)
Commercial mortgage-backed securities:
Agency
Non-agency
Auto loan asset-backed securities
Collateralized loan obligations
FFELP student loan asset-backed securities(2)
Total AFS debt securities
AFS equity securities
Total AFS securities
HTM securities:
U.S. government securities:
Total HTM securities
Total Investment securities
The following tables present the fair value of Investment securities that are in an unrealized loss position:
FFELP student loan asset-backed securities
As discussed in Note 2 to the Companys consolidated financial statements in the 2014 Form 10-K, AFS and HTM securities with a current fair value less than their amortized cost are analyzed as part of the Companys ongoing assessment of temporary versus other-than-temporarily impaired at the individual security level. The net unrealized losses on AFS debt securities reported in the table above are primarily due to higher interest rates since those securities were purchased. The risk of credit loss on securities in an unrealized loss position is considered minimal because all of the Companys agency securities as well as the Companys asset-backed securities, commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS) and collateralized loan obligations (CLOs) are highly rated and because the Companys corporate bonds are all investment grade. The Company does not intend to sell and is not likely to be required to sell its AFS debt securities prior to recovery of its amortized cost basis. The Company does not expect to experience a credit loss on its AFS debt securities or HTM securities based on consideration of the relevant information (as discussed in Note 2 to the Companys consolidated financial statements in the 2014 Form 10-K), including for U.S. government and agency securities, the existence of an explicit and implicit guarantee provided by the U.S. government. The Company believes that its AFS debt securities in an unrealized loss position were not other-than-temporarily impaired at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014.
For AFS equity securities in an unrealized loss position, the Company does not intend to sell these securities or expect to be required to sell these securities prior to the recovery of the cost basis and the Company believes that these securities were not other-than-temporarily impaired at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014.
The following table presents the amortized cost, fair value and annualized average yield of Investment securities by contractual maturity dates at September 30, 2015:
U.S. Treasury securities:
After 1 year through 5 years
After 5 years through 10 years
U.S. agency securities:
After 10 years
Agency:
Due within 1 year
Non-agency:
Auto loan asset-backed securities:
Corporate bonds:
Collateralized loan obligations:
FFELP student loan asset-backed securities:
See Note 12 for additional information on securities issued by VIEs, including U.S. agency mortgage-backed securities, non-agency CMBS, auto loan asset-backed securities, CLO and FFELP student loan asset-backed securities.
The following table presents information pertaining to gross realized gains and losses on sales of AFS securities within the Companys Investment securities portfolio during the quarters and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014:
Gross realized gains
Gross realized (losses)
Gross realized gains and losses are recognized in Other revenues in the Companys condensed consolidated statements of income.
The Company enters into reverse repurchase agreements, repurchase agreements, securities borrowed and securities loaned transactions to, among other things, acquire securities to cover short positions and settle other securities obligations, to accommodate customers needs and to finance the Companys inventory positions.
The Company manages credit exposure arising from such transactions by, in appropriate circumstances, entering into master netting agreements and collateral agreements with counterparties that provide the Company, in the event of a counterparty default (such as bankruptcy or a counterpartys failure to pay or perform), with the right to net a counterpartys rights and obligations under such agreement and liquidate and set off collateral held by the Company against the net amount owed by the counterparty.
The Companys policy is generally to take possession of securities purchased under agreements to resell and securities borrowed, and to receive securities and cash posted as collateral (with rights of rehypothecation). In certain cases, the Company may agree for such collateral to be posted to a third-party custodian under a tri-party arrangement that enables the Company to take control of such collateral in the event of a counterparty default. The Company also monitors the fair value of the underlying securities as compared with the related receivable or payable, including accrued interest, and, as necessary, requests additional collateral as provided under the applicable agreement to ensure such transactions are adequately collateralized. The risk related to a decline in the market value of collateral (pledged or received) is managed by setting appropriate market-based haircuts. Increases in collateral margin calls on secured financing due to market value declines may be mitigated by increases in collateral margin calls on reverse repurchase agreements and securities borrowed transactions with similar quality collateral. Additionally, the Company may request lower quality collateral pledged be replaced with higher quality collateral through collateral substitution rights in the underlying agreements.
The Company actively manages its secured financing in a manner that reduces the potential refinancing risk of secured financing for less liquid assets. The Company considers the quality of collateral when negotiating collateral eligibility with counterparties, as defined by the Companys fundability criteria. The Company utilizes shorter-term secured financing for highly liquid assets and has established longer tenor limits for less liquid assets, for which funding may be at risk in the event of a market disruption.
Offsetting of Certain Collateralized Transactions.
The following tables present information about the offsetting of these instruments and related collateral amounts. For information related to offsetting of derivatives, see Note 4.
Secured Financing TransactionsMaturities and Collateral Pledged.
The following tables present gross obligations for repurchase agreements, securities loaned transactions and obligations to return securities received as collateral by remaining contractual maturity and class of collateral pledged.
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase(1)
Securities loaned(1)
Gross amount of secured financing included in the above offsetting disclosure
Secured Financing by the Class of Collateral Pledged
U.S. government and agency securities
Corporate and other debt
Total securities sold under agreements to repurchase
Total securities loaned
Total obligation to return securities received as collateral
Trading Assets Pledged.
The Company pledges its trading assets to collateralize repurchase agreements and other secured financings. Pledged financial instruments that can be sold or repledged by the secured party are identified as Trading assets (pledged to various parties) in the Companys condensed consolidated statements of financial condition. At September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the carrying value of Trading assets by the Company that have been loaned or pledged to counterparties where those counterparties do not have the right to sell or repledge the collateral were $43.1 billion and $31.3 billion, respectively.
Collateral Received.
The Company receives collateral in the form of securities in connection with reverse repurchase agreements, securities borrowed and derivative transactions, customer margin loans and securities-based lending. In many cases, the Company is permitted to sell or repledge these securities held as collateral and use the securities to secure repurchase agreements, to enter into securities lending and derivative transactions or for delivery to counterparties to cover short positions. The Company additionally receives securities as collateral in connection with certain securities-for-securities transactions in which the Company is the lender. In instances where the Company is permitted to sell or repledge these securities, the Company reports the fair value of the collateral received and the related obligation to return the collateral in its condensed consolidated statements of financial condition. At September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the total fair value of financial instruments received as collateral where the Company is permitted to sell or repledge the securities was $593 billion and $546 billion, respectively, and the fair value of the portion that had been sold or repledged was $438 billion and $403 billion, respectively.
Other.
The Company also engages in margin lending to clients that allows the client to borrow against the value of qualifying securities and is included within Customer and other receivables in the Companys condensed consolidated statements of financial condition. For a further discussion of the Companys margin lending activities, see Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements in the 2014 Form 10-K. At September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, there were approximately $25.7 billion and $29.0 billion, respectively, of customer margin loans outstanding.
Other secured financings include the liabilities related to transfers of financial assets that are accounted for as financings rather than sales, consolidated VIEs where the Company is deemed to be the primary beneficiary, and certain equity-linked notes and other secured borrowings. These liabilities are generally payable from the cash flows of the related assets accounted for as Trading assets (see Notes 10 and 12).
At September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, cash and securities deposited with clearing organizations or segregated under federal and other regulations or requirements were as follows:
Cash deposited with clearing organizations or segregated under federal and other regulations or requirements(1)
Securities(2)
Loans.
The Companys loans held for investment are recorded at amortized cost, and its loans held for sale are recorded at lower of cost or fair value in the Companys condensed consolidated statements of financial condition.
The Companys outstanding loans at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 included the following:
Loans by Product Type
Corporate loans
Consumer loans
Residential real estate loans
Wholesale real estate loans
Total loans, gross of allowance for loan losses
Allowance for loan losses
Total loans, net of allowance for loan losses
The above table does not include Loans and lending commitments held at fair value of $11,334 million and $11,962 million that were recorded as Trading assets in the Companys condensed consolidated statement of financial condition at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. At September 30, 2015, Loans and lending commitments held at fair value consisted of $6,762 million of corporate loans, $1,933 million of residential real estate loans and $2,639 million of wholesale real estate loans. At December 31, 2014, Loans and lending commitments held at fair value consisted of $7,093 million of corporate loans, $1,682 million of residential real estate loans and $3,187 million of wholesale real estate loans. See Note 3 for further information regarding Loans and lending commitments held at fair value.
Credit Quality.
For a discussion about the Companys evaluation of credit transactions and monitoring, see Note 8 to the Companys consolidated financial statements in the 2014 Form 10-K.
The Company utilizes the following credit quality indicators which are consistent with U.S. banking regulators definitions of criticized exposures, in its credit monitoring process for loans held for investment.
Pass. A credit exposure rated pass has a continued expectation of timely repayment, all obligations of the borrower are current, and the obligor complies with material terms and conditions of the lending agreement.
Special Mention. Extensions of credit that have potential weakness that deserve managements close attention, and if left uncorrected may, at some future date, result in the deterioration of the repayment prospects or collateral position.
Substandard. Obligor has a well-defined weakness that jeopardizes the repayment of the debt and has a high probability of payment default with the distinct possibility that the Company will sustain some loss if noted deficiencies are not corrected.
Doubtful. Inherent weakness in the exposure makes the collection or repayment in full, based on existing facts, conditions and circumstances, highly improbable, and the amount of loss is uncertain.
Loss. Extensions of credit classified as loss are considered uncollectible and are charged off.
Loans considered as doubtful or loss are considered impaired. Substandard loans are regularly reviewed for impairment. When a loan is impaired the impairment is measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loans effective interest rate or as a practical expedient the observable market price of the loan or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. For further information, see Note 2 to the Companys consolidated financial statements in the 2014 Form 10-K.
The following tables present credit quality indicators for the Companys loans held for investment, gross of allowance for loan losses, by product type.
Loans by Credit Quality Indicators
Pass
Special mention
Substandard
Doubtful
Total loans
Allowance for Credit Losses and Impaired Loans.
For factors considered by the Company in determining the allowance for loan losses and impairments, see Notes 2 and 8 to the Companys consolidated financial statements in the 2014 Form 10-K.
The tables below provide details on impaired and past due loans for the Companys loans held for investment.
Impaired loans with allowance
Impaired loans without allowance(1)
Impaired loans unpaid principal balance
Past due 90 days loans and on nonaccrual
Loans by Region
Impaired loans
EMEAEurope, Middle East and Africa.
The table below summarizes information about the allowance for loan losses, loans by impairment methodology, the allowance for lending commitments and lending commitments by impairment methodology.
Allowance for loan losses:
Balance at December 31, 2014
Gross charge-offs
Gross recoveries
Net recoveries/(charge-offs)
Provision for loan losses(1)
Other(2)
Balance at September 30, 2015
Allowance for loan losses by impairment methodology:
Inherent
Specific
Total allowance for loan losses at September 30, 2015
Loans evaluated by impairment methodology(3):
Total loans evaluated at September 30, 2015
Allowance for lending commitments:
Provision for lending commitments(4)
Allowance for lending commitments by impairment methodology:
Total allowance for lending commitments at September 30, 2015
Lending commitments evaluated by impairment methodology(3):
Total lending commitments evaluated at September 30, 2015
Balance at December 31, 2013
Net charge-offs
Provision (release) for loan losses(1)
Balance at September 30, 2014
Total allowance for loan losses at September 30, 2014
Total loan evaluated at September 30, 2014
Total allowance for lending commitments at September 30, 2014
Total lending commitments evaluated at September 30, 2014
Employee Loans.
Employee loans are granted primarily in conjunction with a program established in the Companys Wealth Management business segment to retain and recruit certain employees. These loans are recorded in Customer and other receivables in the Companys condensed consolidated statements of financial condition. These loans are full recourse, generally require periodic payments and have repayment terms ranging from one to twelve years. The Company establishes an allowance for loan amounts it does not consider recoverable, which is recorded in Compensation and benefits expense. At September 30, 2015, the Company had $4,887 million of employee loans, net of an allowance of approximately $121 million. At December 31, 2014, the Company had $5,130 million of employee loans, net of an allowance of approximately $116 million.
Equity Method Investments.
The Company has investments accounted for under the equity method of accounting (see Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements in the 2014 Form 10-K) of $3,244 million and $3,332 million at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively, included in Other investments in the Companys condensed consolidated statements of financial condition. Income from equity method investments was $35 million and $32 million for the quarters ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and $118 million and $108 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and is included in Other revenues in the Companys condensed consolidated statements of income. Income from the Companys equity method investments for the quarters and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 was primarily related to the Companys 40% stake in Mitsubishi UFJ Morgan Stanley Securities Co., Ltd. (MUMSS), as described below.
Japanese Securities Joint Venture.
The Company holds a 40% voting interest and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. holds a 60% voting interest in MUMSS. The Company accounts for its interest in MUMSS as an equity method investment within the Companys Institutional Securities business segment. During the quarters ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company recorded income of $54 million and $55 million, respectively, and income of $194 million and $146 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, within Other revenues in the Companys condensed consolidated statements of income, arising from the Companys 40% stake in MUMSS.
In June 2015 and 2014, MUMSS paid a dividend of approximately $291 million and $594 million, respectively, of which the Company received approximately $116 million and $238 million, respectively, for its proportionate share of MUMSS.
The Companys deposits, which were primarily in the U.S., were as follows:
Savings and demand deposits
Time deposits
Interest-bearing deposits at September 30, 2015 included $143,528 million of saving deposits payable upon demand, and $2,437 million of time deposits maturing in 2015, $1,053 million of time deposits maturing in 2016, $180 million of time deposits maturing in 2017 and $13 million of time deposits maturing in 2018.
The vast majority of deposits in Morgan Stanley Bank, N.A. (MSBNA) and Morgan Stanley Private Bank, National Association (MSPBNA) (collectively, U.S. Bank Subsidiaries) are sourced from the Companys retail brokerage accounts. Concurrent with the acquisition of the remaining 35% stake in the purchase of the retail securities joint venture between the Company and Citigroup Inc. (Citi) (the Wealth Management JV) in 2013, the deposit sweep agreement between Citi and the Company was terminated (see Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements in the 2014 Form 10-K). The transfer of deposits previously held by Citi to the Companys depository institutions relating to the Companys customer accounts was completed at June 30, 2015. During 2015, $8.7 billion of deposits were transferred by Citi to the Companys depository institutions.
Long-Term Borrowings.
The Companys long-term borrowings included the following components:
Senior debt
Subordinated debt
Junior subordinated debentures
During the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company issued notes with a principal amount of approximately $30.2 billion and $26.5 billion, respectively, and approximately $17.6 billion and $24.7 billion, respectively, in aggregate long-term borrowings matured or were retired.
The weighted average maturity of the Companys long-term borrowings, based upon stated maturity dates, was approximately 5.9 years for both September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014.
During May of 2015, Morgan Stanley Capital Trusts VI and VII redeemed all of their issued and outstanding 6.60% Capital Securities, respectively.
Other Secured Financings.
Other secured financings include the liabilities related to transfers of financial assets that are accounted for as financings rather than sales, consolidated VIEs where the Company is deemed to be the primary beneficiary, pledged commodities, certain equity-linked notes and other secured borrowings. See Note 12 for further information on Other secured financings related to VIEs and securitization activities.
The Companys Other secured financings consisted of the following:
Secured financings with original maturities greater than one year
Secured financings with original maturities one year or less
Failed sales(1)
Commitments.
The Companys commitments associated with outstanding letters of credit and other financial guarantees obtained to satisfy collateral requirements, investment activities, corporate lending, securities financing arrangements, mortgage lending, underwriting commitments and other financing arrangements at September 30, 2015 are summarized below by years to maturity. Since commitments associated with these instruments may expire unused, the amounts shown do not necessarily reflect the actual future cash funding requirements:
Letters of credit and other financial guarantees obtained to satisfy collateral requirements
Investment activities
Primary lending commitmentsinvestment grade(1)
Primary lending commitmentsnon-investment grade(1)
Secondary lending commitments
Commitments for secured lending transactions
Forward starting reverse repurchase agreements and securities borrowing agreements(2)(3)
Commercial and residential mortgage-related commitments
Other lending commitments
For a further description of these commitments, refer to Note 13 to the Companys consolidated financial statements in the 2014 Form 10-K.
The Company sponsors several non-consolidated investment funds for third-party investors where the Company typically acts as general partner of, and investment advisor to, these funds and typically commits to invest a minority of the capital of such funds, with subscribing third-party investors contributing the majority. The Companys employees, including its senior officers, as well as the Companys Directors, may participate on the same terms and conditions as other investors in certain of these funds that the Company forms primarily for client investment, except that the Company may waive or lower applicable fees and charges for its employees. The Company has contractual capital commitments, guarantees, lending facilities and counterparty arrangements with respect to these investment funds.
Guarantees.
The table below summarizes certain information regarding the Companys obligations under guarantee arrangements at September 30, 2015:
Type of Guarantee
Credit derivative contracts(1)
Other credit contracts
Non-credit derivative contracts(1)
Standby letters of credit and other financial guarantees issued(2)
Market value guarantees
Liquidity facilities
Whole loan sales guarantees
Securitization representations and warranties
General partner guarantees
For a further description of these guarantees, refer to Note 13 to the Companys consolidated financial statements in the 2014 Form 10-K.
The Company has obligations under certain guarantee arrangements, including contracts and indemnification agreements, that contingently require a guarantor to make payments to the guaranteed party based on changes in an underlying measure (such as an interest or foreign exchange rate, security or commodity price, an index, or the occurrence or non-occurrence of a specified event) related to an asset, liability or equity security of a guaranteed party. Also included as guarantees are contracts that contingently require the guarantor to make payments to the guaranteed party based on another entitys failure to perform under an agreement, as well as indirect guarantees of the indebtedness of others. The Companys use of guarantees is described in Note 13 to the Companys consolidated financial statements in the 2014 Form 10-K.
Other Guarantees and Indemnities.
In the normal course of business, the Company provides guarantees and indemnifications in a variety of commercial transactions. These provisions generally are standard contractual terms. Certain of these guarantees and indemnifications related to trust preferred securities, indemnities, exchange/clearinghouse member guarantees and merger and acquisition guarantees are described in Note 13 to the Companys consolidated financial statements in the 2014 Form 10-K.
In the ordinary course of business, the Company guarantees the debt and/or certain trading obligations (including obligations associated with derivatives, foreign exchange contracts and the settlement of physical commodities) of certain subsidiaries. These guarantees generally are entity or product specific and are required by investors or trading counterparties. The activities of the Companys subsidiaries covered by these guarantees (including any related debt or trading obligations) are included in the Companys condensed consolidated financial statements.
Contingencies.
Legal. In the normal course of business, the Company has been named, from time to time, as a defendant in various legal actions, including arbitrations, class actions and other litigation, arising in connection with its activities as a global diversified financial services institution. Certain of the actual or threatened legal actions include claims for substantial compensatory and/or punitive damages or claims for indeterminate amounts of damages. In some cases, the entities that would otherwise be the primary defendants in such cases are bankrupt or are in financial distress. These actions have included, but are not limited to, residential mortgage and credit crisis related matters. Over the last several years, the level of litigation and investigatory activity (both formal and informal) by governmental and self-regulatory agencies has increased materially in the financial services industry. As a result, the Company expects that it may become the subject of increased claims for damages and other relief and, while the Company has identified below any individual proceedings where the Company believes a material loss to be reasonably possible and reasonably estimable, there can be no assurance that material losses will not be incurred from claims that have not yet been asserted or are not yet determined to be probable or possible and reasonably estimable losses.
The Company contests liability and/or the amount of damages as appropriate in each pending matter. Where available information indicates that it is probable a liability had been incurred at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the Company can reasonably estimate the amount of that loss, the Company accrues the estimated loss by a charge to income. The Company expects future litigation accruals in general to continue to be elevated and the changes in accruals from period to period may fluctuate significantly, given the current environment regarding government investigations and private litigation affecting global financial services firms, including the Company.
The Company incurred legal expenses of $320 million and $555 million in the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively, and $66 million and $256 million in the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively, within Other non-interest expenses.
In many proceedings and investigations, however, it is inherently difficult to determine whether any loss is probable or even possible or to estimate the amount of any loss. In addition, even where a loss is possible or an exposure to loss exists in excess of the liability already accrued with respect to a previously recognized loss contingency, it is not always possible to reasonably estimate the size of the possible loss or range of loss.
For certain legal proceedings and investigations, the Company cannot reasonably estimate such losses, particularly for proceedings and investigations where the factual record is being developed or contested or where plaintiffs or governmental entities seek substantial or indeterminate damages, restitution, disgorgement or penalties. Numerous issues may need to be resolved, including through potentially lengthy discovery and determination of important factual matters, determination of issues related to class certification and the
calculation of damages or other relief, and by addressing novel or unsettled legal questions relevant to the proceedings or investigations in question, before a loss or additional loss or range of loss or additional loss can be reasonably estimated for a proceeding or investigation.
For certain other legal proceedings and investigations, the Company can estimate reasonably possible losses, additional losses, ranges of loss or ranges of additional loss in excess of amounts accrued, but does not believe, based on current knowledge and after consultation with counsel, that such losses will have a material adverse effect on the Companys consolidated financial statements as a whole, other than the matters referred to in the following paragraphs.
On July 15, 2010, China Development Industrial Bank (CDIB) filed a complaint against the Company, styled China Development Industrial Bank v. Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated et al., which is pending in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County (Supreme Court of NY). The complaint relates to a $275 million credit default swap referencing the super senior portion of the STACK 2006-1 CDO. The complaint asserts claims for common law fraud, fraudulent inducement and fraudulent concealment and alleges that the Company misrepresented the risks of the STACK 2006-1 CDO to CDIB, and that the Company knew that the assets backing the CDO were of poor quality when it entered into the credit default swap with CDIB. The complaint seeks compensatory damages related to the approximately $228 million that CDIB alleges it has already lost under the credit default swap, rescission of CDIBs obligation to pay an additional $12 million, punitive damages, equitable relief, fees and costs. On February 28, 2011, the court denied the Companys motion to dismiss the complaint. Based on currently available information, the Company believes it could incur a loss of up to approximately $240 million plus pre- and post-judgment interest, fees and costs.
On April 25, 2012, The Prudential Insurance Company of America and certain affiliates filed a complaint against the Company and certain affiliates in the Superior Court of the State of New Jersey, styled The Prudential Insurance Company of America, et al. v. Morgan Stanley, et al. On October 16, 2012, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint which alleges that defendants made untrue statements and material omissions in connection with the sale to plaintiffs of certain mortgage pass-through certificates backed by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans. The total amount of certificates allegedly sponsored, underwritten and/or sold by the Company was approximately $1.073 billion. The amended complaint raises claims under the New Jersey Uniform Securities Law, as well as common law claims of negligent misrepresentation, fraud, fraudulent inducement, equitable fraud, aiding and abetting fraud, and violations of the New Jersey RICO statute, and includes a claim for treble damages. On April 26, 2013, the defendants filed an answer to the amended complaint. On January 2, 2015, the court denied defendants renewed motion to dismiss the amended complaint. At September 25, 2015, the current unpaid balance of the mortgage pass-through certificates at issue in this action was approximately $581 million, and the certificates had not yet incurred actual losses. Based on currently available information, the Company believes it could incur a loss in this action up to the difference between the $581 million unpaid balance of these certificates (plus any losses incurred) and their fair market value at the time of a judgment against the Company, or upon sale, plus pre- and post-judgment interest, fees and costs. The Company may be entitled to be indemnified for some of these losses and to an offset for interest received by the plaintiff prior to a judgment.
On August 7, 2012, U.S. Bank, in its capacity as Trustee, filed a complaint on behalf of Morgan Stanley Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-4SL and Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-4SL (together, the Trust) against the Company. The matter is styled Morgan Stanley Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-4SL, et al. v. Morgan Stanley Mortgage Capital Inc. and is pending in the Supreme Court of NY. The complaint asserts claims for breach of contract and alleges, among other things, that the loans in the trust, which had an original principal balance of approximately $303 million, breached various representations and warranties. The complaint seeks,
among other relief, rescission of the mortgage loan purchase agreement underlying the transaction, specific performance and unspecified damages and interest. On August 8, 2014, the court granted in part and denied in part the Companys motion to dismiss. On September 3, 2014, the Company filed its answer to the complaint. Based on currently available information, the Company believes that it could incur a loss in this action of up to approximately $149 million, the total original unpaid balance of the mortgage loans for which the Company received repurchase demands that it did not repurchase, plus pre- and post-judgment interest, fees and costs, but plaintiff is seeking to expand the number of loans at issue and the possible range of loss could increase.
On August 8, 2012, U.S. Bank, in its capacity as Trustee, filed a complaint on behalf of Morgan Stanley Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-14SL, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-14SL, Morgan Stanley Mortgage Loan Trust 2007-4SL and Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-4SL against the Company. The complaint is styled Morgan Stanley Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-14SL, et al. v. Morgan Stanley Mortgage Capital Holdings LLC, as successor in interest to Morgan Stanley Mortgage Capital Inc. and is pending in the Supreme Court of NY. The complaint asserts claims for breach of contract and alleges, among other things, that the loans in the trusts, which had original principal balances of approximately $354 million and $305 million respectively, breached various representations and warranties. On August 16, 2013, the court granted in part and denied in part the Companys motion to dismiss the complaint. On September 17, 2013, the Company filed its answer to the complaint. On September 26, 2013, and October 7, 2013, the Company and the plaintiff, respectively, filed notices of appeal with respect to the courts August 16, 2013 decision. The plaintiff is seeking, among other relief, rescission of the mortgage loan purchase agreements underlying the transactions, specific performance and unspecified damages and interest. Based on currently available information, the Company believes that it could incur a loss in this action of up to approximately $527 million, the total original unpaid balance of the mortgage loans for which the Company received repurchase demands that it did not repurchase, plus pre- and post-judgment interest, fees and costs, but plaintiff is seeking to expand the number of loans at issue and the possible range of loss could increase.
On September 28, 2012, U.S. Bank, in its capacity as Trustee, filed a complaint on behalf of Morgan Stanley Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-13ARX against the Company styled Morgan Stanley Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-13ARX v. Morgan Stanley Mortgage Capital Holdings LLC, as successor in interest to Morgan Stanley Mortgage Capital Inc., pending in the Supreme Court of NY. U.S. Bank filed an amended complaint on January 17, 2013, which asserts claims for breach of contract and alleges, among other things, that the loans in the trust, which had an original principal balance of approximately $609 million, breached various representations and warranties. The amended complaint seeks, among other relief, declaratory judgment relief, specific performance and unspecified damages and interest. On September 25, 2014, the court granted in part and denied in part the Companys motion to dismiss. Based on currently available information, the Company believes that it could incur a loss in this action of up to approximately $170 million, the total original unpaid balance of the mortgage loans for which the Company received repurchase demands that it did not repurchase, plus pre- and post-judgment interest, fees and costs, but plaintiff is seeking to expand the number of loans at issue and the possible range of loss could increase.
On January 10, 2013, U.S. Bank, in its capacity as Trustee, filed a complaint on behalf of Morgan Stanley Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-10SL and Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-10SL against the Company. The complaint is styled Morgan Stanley Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-10SL, et al. v. Morgan Stanley Mortgage Capital Holdings LLC, as successor in interest to Morgan Stanley Mortgage Capital Inc. and is pending in the Supreme Court of NY. The complaint asserts claims for breach of contract and alleges, among other things, that the loans in the trust, which had an original principal balance of approximately $300 million, breached various representations and warranties. The complaint seeks, among other relief, an order requiring the Company to comply with the loan breach remedy procedures in the transaction documents, unspecified damages,
and interest. On August 8, 2014, the court granted in part and denied in part the Companys motion to dismiss. On September 3, 2014, the Company filed its answer to the complaint. Based on currently available information, the Company believes that it could incur a loss in this action of up to approximately $197 million, the total original unpaid balance of the mortgage loans for which the Company received repurchase demands that it did not repurchase, plus pre- and post-judgment interest, fees and costs, but plaintiff is seeking to expand the number of loans at issue and the possible range of loss could increase.
On May 3, 2013, plaintiffs in Deutsche Zentral-Genossenschaftsbank AG et al. v. Morgan Stanley et al. filed a complaint against the Company, certain affiliates, and other defendants in the Supreme Court of NY. The complaint alleges that defendants made material misrepresentations and omissions in the sale to plaintiffs of certain mortgage pass-through certificates backed by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans. The total amount of certificates allegedly sponsored, underwritten and/or sold by the Company to plaintiff currently at issue in this action was approximately $644 million. The complaint alleges causes of action against the Company for common law fraud, fraudulent concealment, aiding and abetting fraud, negligent misrepresentation, and rescission and seeks, among other things, compensatory and punitive damages. On September 12, 2014, the Company filed a notice of appeal from the June 10, 2014 denial of the defendants motion to dismiss. On January 12, 2015, the Company filed an amended answer to the complaint. At September 25, 2015, the current unpaid balance of the mortgage pass-through certificates at issue in this action was approximately $277 million, and the certificates had incurred actual losses of approximately $81 million. Based on currently available information, the Company believes it could incur a loss in this action up to the difference between the $277 million unpaid balance of these certificates (plus any losses incurred) and their fair market value at the time of a judgment against the Company, or upon sale, plus pre- and post-judgment interest, fees and costs. The Company may be entitled to be indemnified for some of these losses.
On September 23, 2013, the plaintiff in National Credit Union Administration Board v. Morgan Stanley & Co. Inc., et al. filed a complaint against the Company and certain affiliates in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (SDNY). The complaint alleges that defendants made untrue statements of material fact or omitted to state material facts in the sale to the plaintiff of certain mortgage pass-through certificates issued by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans. The total amount of certificates allegedly sponsored, underwritten and/or sold by the Company to plaintiffs was approximately $417 million. The amended complaint, filed November 17, 2014, alleges causes of action against the Company for violations of the Texas Securities Act and the Illinois Securities Law of 1953 and seeks, among other things, rescissory and compensatory damages. On December 15, 2014, defendants answered the amended complaint. At September 25, 2015, the current unpaid balance of the mortgage pass-through certificates at issue in this action was approximately $194 million, and the certificates had incurred actual losses of $31 million. Based on currently available information, the Company believes it could incur a loss in this action up to the difference between the $194 million unpaid balance of these certificates (plus any losses incurred) and their fair market value at the time of a judgment against the Company, or upon sale, plus pre- and post-judgment interest, fees and costs. The Company may be entitled to be indemnified for some of these losses and to an offset for interest received by the plaintiff prior to a judgment.
On April 28, 2014, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, in its capacity as trustee for Morgan Stanley Structured Trust I 2007-1, filed a complaint against the Company. The matter is styled Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Morgan Stanley Mortgage Capital Holdings LLC and is pending in the SDNY. The complaint asserts claims for breach of contract and alleges, among other things, that the loans in the trust, which had an original principal balance of approximately $735 million, breached various representations and warranties. The complaint seeks, among other relief, specific performance of the loan breach remedy procedures in the transaction documents, unspecified compensatory and/or rescissory damages, interest and costs. On April 3, 2015, the court granted in part and denied in part the Companys motion to dismiss. On April 17, 2015, the
Company filed its answer to the complaint. Based on currently available information, the Company believes that it could incur a loss in this action of up to approximately $292 million, the total original unpaid balance of the mortgage loans for which the Company received repurchase demands that it did not repurchase, plus pre- and post-judgment interest, fees and costs, but plaintiff is seeking to expand the number of loans at issue and the possible range of loss could increase.
On July 8, 2013, U.S. Bank National Association, in its capacity as trustee for Morgan Stanley Mortgage Loan Trust 2007-2AX, filed a complaint against the Company. The matter is styled U.S. Bank National Association, solely in its capacity as Trustee of the Morgan Stanley Mortgage Loan Trust 2007-2AX (MSM 2007-2AX) v. Morgan Stanley Mortgage Capital Holdings LLC, as Successor-by-Merger to Morgan Stanley Mortgage Capital Inc. and GreenPoint Mortgage Funding, Inc. and is pending in the Supreme Court of NY. The complaint asserts claims for breach of contract and alleges, among other things, that the loans in the trust, which had an original principal balance of approximately $650 million, breached various representations and warranties. The complaint seeks, among other relief, specific performance of the loan breach remedy procedures in the transaction documents, unspecified damages and interest. On August 22, 2013, the Company filed a motion to dismiss the complaint, which was granted in part and denied in part on November 24, 2014. The Company filed its answer on December 12, 2014. Based on currently available information, the Company believes that it could incur a loss in this action of up to approximately $240 million, the total original unpaid balance of the mortgage loans for which the Company received repurchase demands that it did not repurchase, plus pre- and post-judgment interest, fees and costs, but plaintiff is seeking to expand the number of loans at issue and the possible range of loss could increase.
On January 23, 2015, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, in its capacity as trustee for Morgan Stanley ABS Capital I Inc. Trust 2007-NC4, filed a complaint against the Company. The matter is styled Deutsche Bank National Trust Company solely in its capacity as Trustee of the Morgan Stanley ABS Capital I Inc. Trust 2007-NC4 v. Morgan Stanley Mortgage Capital Holdings LLC as Successor-by-Merger to Morgan Stanley Mortgage Capital Inc., and Morgan Stanley ABS Capital I Inc. and is pending in the Supreme Court of NY. The complaint asserts claims for breach of contract and alleges, among other things, that the loans in the trust, which had an original principal balance of approximately $1.05 billion, breached various representations and warranties. The complaint seeks, among other relief, specific performance of the loan breach remedy procedures in the transaction documents, compensatory, consequential, rescissory, equitable and punitive damages, attorneys fees, costs and other related expenses, and interest. On October 20, 2015, the court granted in part and denied in part the Companys motion to dismiss. Based on currently available information, the Company believes that it could incur a loss in this action of up to approximately $277 million, the total original unpaid balance of the mortgage loans for which the Company received repurchase demands from a certificate holder and a monoline insurer that the Company did not repurchase, plus pre- and post-judgment interest, fees and costs, but plaintiff is seeking to expand the number of loans at issue and the possible range of loss could increase.
The Company is involved with various special purpose entities (SPE) in the normal course of business. In most cases, these entities are deemed to be VIEs. The Companys transactions with VIEs primarily include securitizations, municipal tender option bond trusts, credit protection purchased through credit-linked notes, other structured financings, collateralized loan and debt obligations, equity-linked notes, managed real estate partnerships and asset management investment funds. The Companys continuing involvement in VIEs that it does not consolidate can include ownership of retained interests in Company-sponsored transactions, interests purchased in the secondary market (both for Company-sponsored transactions and transactions sponsored by third parties), and
derivatives with securitization SPEs (primarily interest rate derivatives in commercial mortgage and residential mortgage securitizations and credit derivatives in which the Company has purchased protection in synthetic CDOs).
For a further discussion on the Companys VIEs, the determination and structure of VIEs and securitization activities, see Note 7 to the Companys consolidated financial statements in the 2014 Form 10-K.
Consolidated VIEs.
Except for consolidated VIEs included in other structured financings and managed real estate partnerships in the tables below, the Company accounts for the assets held by the entities primarily in Trading assets and the liabilities of the entities in Other secured financings in its condensed consolidated statements of financial condition. For consolidated VIEs included in other structured financings, the Company accounts for the assets held by the entities primarily in Premises, equipment and software costs, and Other assets in its condensed consolidated statements of financial condition. For consolidated VIEs included in managed real estate partnerships, the Company accounts for the assets held by the entities primarily in Trading assets in its condensed consolidated statements of financial condition. Except for consolidated VIEs included in other structured financings, the assets and liabilities are measured at fair value, with changes in fair value reflected in earnings.
The assets owned by many consolidated VIEs cannot be removed unilaterally by the Company and are not generally available to the Company. The related liabilities issued by many consolidated VIEs are non-recourse to the Company. In certain other consolidated VIEs, the Company either has the unilateral right to remove assets or provide additional recourse through derivatives such as total return swaps, guarantees or other forms of involvement.
The following table presents information at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 about VIEs that the Company consolidates. Consolidated VIE assets and liabilities are presented after intercompany eliminations and include assets financed on a non-recourse basis:
Mortgage- and asset-backed securitizations
Managed real estate partnerships(1)
Other structured financings
Credit linked notes and Other
In general, the Companys exposure to loss in consolidated VIEs is limited to losses that would be absorbed on the VIEs assets recognized in its financial statements, net of losses absorbed by third-party holders of the VIEs liabilities. At September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, managed real estate partnerships reflected nonredeemable noncontrolling interests in the Companys condensed consolidated financial statements of $59 million and $240 million, respectively. The Company also had additional maximum exposure to losses of approximately $69 million and $105 million at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively, primarily related to certain derivatives, commitments, guarantees and other forms of involvement.
Non-Consolidated VIEs.
The following tables present information about certain non-consolidated VIEs in which the Company had variable interests at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014. The tables include all VIEs in which the Company has determined that its maximum exposure to loss is greater than specific thresholds or meets certain other criteria. Most of the VIEs included in the tables below are sponsored by unrelated parties; the Companys involvement generally is the result of the Companys secondary market-making activities and securities held in its Investment securities portfolio (see Note 5):
VIE assets that the Company does not consolidate (unpaid principal balance)(1)
Maximum exposure to loss:
Debt and equity interests(2)
Derivative and other contracts
Commitments, guarantees and other
Total maximum exposure to loss
Carrying value of exposure to lossAssets:
Total carrying value of exposure to lossAssets
Carrying value of exposure to lossLiabilities:
Total carrying value of exposure to lossLiabilities
VIE assets that the Company does not consolidate (unpaid principal balance)(3)
Debt and equity interests(4)
The Companys maximum exposure to loss often differs from the carrying value of the variable interests held by the Company. The maximum exposure to loss is dependent on the nature of the Companys variable interest in the VIEs and is limited to the notional amounts of certain liquidity facilities, other credit support, total return swaps, written put options, and the fair value of certain other derivatives and investments the Company has made in the VIEs. Liabilities issued by VIEs generally are non-recourse to the Company. Where notional amounts are utilized in quantifying maximum exposure related to derivatives, such amounts do not reflect fair value write-downs already recorded by the Company.
The Companys maximum exposure to loss does not include the offsetting benefit of any financial instruments that the Company may utilize to hedge these risks associated with the Companys variable interests. In addition, the Companys maximum exposure to loss is not reduced by the amount of collateral held as part of a transaction with the VIE or any party to the VIE directly against a specific exposure to loss.
Securitization transactions generally involve VIEs. Primarily as a result of its secondary market-making activities, the Company owned additional securities issued by securitization SPEs for which the maximum exposure to loss is less than specific thresholds. These additional securities totaled $13.7 billion and $14.0 billion at September 30, 2015, and December 31, 2014, respectively. These securities were either retained in connection with transfers of assets by the Company, acquired in connection with secondary market-making activities or held as AFS securities in the Companys Investment securities portfolio (see Note 5). At September 30, 2015, and December 31, 2014, these securities consisted of securities backed by residential mortgage loans, commercial mortgage loans or other consumer loans, such as credit card receivables, automobile loans and student loans, and CDOs or CLOs. The Companys primary risk exposure is to the securities issued by the SPE owned by the Company, with the risk highest on the most subordinate class of beneficial interests. These securities generally are included in Trading assetsCorporate and other debt or AFS securities within the Companys Investment securities portfolio and are measured at fair value (see Note 3). The Company does not provide additional support in these transactions through contractual facilities, such as liquidity facilities, guarantees or similar derivatives. The Companys maximum exposure to loss generally equals the fair value of the securities owned.
Transfers of Assets with Continuing Involvement.
The following tables present information at September 30, 2015, and December 31, 2014, respectively, regarding transactions with SPEs in which the Company, acting as principal, transferred financial assets with continuing involvement and received sales treatment:
SPE assets (unpaid principal balance)(2)
Retained interests (fair value):
Investment grade
Total retained interests (fair value)
Interests purchased in the secondary market (fair value):
Total interests purchased in the secondary market (fair value)
Derivative assets (fair value)
Derivative liabilities (fair value)
Transferred assets are carried at fair value prior to securitization, and any changes in fair value are recognized in the Companys condensed consolidated statements of income. The Company may act as underwriter of the beneficial interests issued by these securitization vehicles. Investment banking underwriting net revenues are recognized in connection with these transactions. The Company may retain interests in the securitized financial assets as one or more tranches of the securitization. These retained interests are included in the Companys condensed consolidated statements of financial condition at fair value. Any changes in the fair value of such retained interests are recognized in the Companys condensed consolidated statements of income.
Net gains on sale of assets in securitization transactions at the time of the sale were not material for the quarters and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014.
For the quarters and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, proceeds from new securitization transactions and proceeds from retained interests in securitization transactions received by the Company were as follows:
Proceeds received from new securitization transactions
Proceeds from retained interests in securitization transactions
The Company has provided, or otherwise agreed to be responsible for, representations and warranties regarding certain assets transferred in securitization transactions sponsored by the Company (see Note 11).
In connection with its underwriting of CLO transactions for unaffiliated sponsors, the Company received proceeds from the sale of corporate loans sold to those SPEs as follows:
Proceeds from sale of corporate loans sold to those SPEs
Net gains on sale of corporate loans to CLO transactions at the time of sale were not material for the quarters and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014.
The Company also enters into transactions in which it sells equity securities and contemporaneously enters into bilateral OTC equity derivatives with the purchasers of the securities, through which derivatives it retains the exposure to the securities. For transactions where the derivatives were outstanding at September 30, 2015, the carrying value of assets derecognized at the time of sale and the gross cash proceeds were $7.7 billion. In addition, the fair value at September 30, 2015 of the assets sold was $7.4 billion while the fair value of derivative assets and derivative liabilities recognized in the Companys condensed consolidated statement of financial condition at September 30, 2015 was $39.5 million and $225 million, respectively (see Note 4).
Failed Sales.
In order to be treated as a sale of assets for accounting purposes, a transaction must meet all of the criteria stipulated in the accounting guidance for the transfer of financial assets. A transfer that fails to meet these criteria is treated as a failed sale. In such cases, the Company continues to recognize the assets in Trading assets, and the Company recognizes the associated liabilities in Other secured financings in its condensed consolidated statements of financial condition (see Note 10).
The assets transferred to unconsolidated VIEs in transactions accounted for as failed sales cannot be removed unilaterally by the Company and are not generally available to the Company. The related liabilities are also non-recourse to the Company. In certain other failed sale transactions, the Company has the right to remove assets or provide additional recourse through derivatives such as total return swaps, guarantees or other forms of involvement.
The following table presents information about the carrying value (equal to fair value) of assets and liabilities resulting from transfers of financial assets treated by the Company as secured financings:
Failed sales
Regulatory Capital Framework.
For a discussion of the Companys regulatory capital framework, see Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements in the 2014 Form 10-K.
Calculation of Risk-Based Capital Ratios.
The Company is required to calculate and hold capital against credit, market and operational risk-weighted assets (RWAs). For a further discussion of the Companys RWAs, see Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements in the 2014 Form 10-K.
As a U.S. Basel III Advanced Approach banking organization, the Company is subject to a permanent capital floor based on the lower of the risk-based capital ratios calculated using (i) standardized approaches for calculating credit risk RWAs and market risk RWAs (the Standardized Approach); and (ii) an advanced
internal ratings-based approach for calculating credit risk RWAs, an advanced measurement approach for calculating operational risk RWAs, and an advanced approach for calculating market risk RWAs (the Advanced Approach) under the U.S. revised risk-based and leverage capital framework, referred to herein as U.S. Basel III. The capital floor applies to the calculation of the minimum risk-based capital requirements and, when in effect, the capital conservation buffer, the countercyclical capital buffer (if deployed by banking regulators), and the global systemically important bank (G-SIB) capital surcharge.
The methods for calculating each of the Companys risk-based capital ratios will change through January 1, 2022 as aspects of U.S. Basel III are phased in. These ongoing methodological changes may result in differences in the Companys reported capital ratios from one reporting period to the next that are independent of changes to the Companys capital base, asset composition, off-balance sheet exposures or risk profile.
The Companys Regulatory Capital and Capital Ratios.
Beginning on January 1, 2015, the risk-based capital ratios for regulatory purposes of the Company and its U.S. Bank Subsidiaries are the lower of each ratio calculated using RWAs under the Advanced Approach or the Standardized Approach under U.S. Basel III, in both cases subject to transitional provisions. In 2014, the Companys binding risk-based capital ratios were the lower of its ratios computed under the Advanced Approach or U.S. banking regulators U.S. Basel I-based rules (U.S. Basel I) as supplemented by rules that implemented the Basel Committees market risk capital framework amendment, commonly referred to as Basel 2.5. At September 30, 2015, the Companys risk-based capital ratios were lower under the Advanced Approach transitional rules; however, the risk-based capital ratios for its U.S. Bank Subsidiaries were lower under the Standardized Approach transitional rules.
The following table presents the Companys capital measures under the U.S. Basel III Advanced Approach transitional rules and the minimum regulatory capital ratios.
Regulatory capital and capital ratios:
Common Equity Tier 1 capital
Tier 1 capital
Total capital
Tier 1 leverage
RWAs
Adjusted average assets(2)
The Companys U.S. Bank Subsidiaries.
The Companys U.S. Bank Subsidiaries are subject to similar regulatory capital requirements as the Company. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Companys U.S. Bank Subsidiaries financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, each of the Companys U.S. Bank Subsidiaries must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of its assets, liabilities and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices.
The following table sets forth the capital information for MSBNA:
The following table sets forth the capital information for MSPBNA:
Under regulatory capital requirements adopted by the U.S. federal banking agencies, U.S. depository institutions, in order to be considered well-capitalized, must maintain certain minimum capital ratios. Each U.S. depository institution subsidiary of the Company must be well-capitalized in order for the Company to continue to qualify as a financial holding company and to continue to engage in the broadest range of financial activities permitted for financial holding companies. At September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Companys U.S. Bank Subsidiaries maintained capital at levels in excess of the universally mandated well-capitalized requirements. The Companys U.S. Bank Subsidiaries maintained capital at levels sufficiently in excess of these well capitalized requirements to address any additional capital needs and requirements identified by the U.S. federal banking regulators.
MS&Co. and Other Broker-Dealers.
Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC (MS&Co.) is a registered broker-dealer and registered futures commission merchant and, accordingly, is subject to the minimum net capital requirements of the SEC and the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). MS&Co. has consistently operated with capital in excess of its regulatory capital requirements. MS&Co.s net capital totaled $9,533 million and $6,593 million at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively, which exceeded the amount required by $7,784 million and $4,928 million, respectively. MS&Co. is required to hold tentative net capital in excess of $1 billion and net capital in excess of $500 million in accordance with the market and credit risk standards of Appendix E of SEC Rule 15c3-1. MS&Co. is also required to notify the SEC in the event that its tentative net capital is less than $5 billion. At September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, MS&Co. had tentative net capital in excess of the minimum and the notification requirements.
Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC (MSSB LLC) is a registered broker-dealer and introducing broker for the futures business and, accordingly, is subject to the minimum net capital requirements of the SEC and the CFTC. MSSB LLC has consistently operated with capital in excess of its regulatory capital requirements. MSSB LLCs net capital totaled $4,452 million and $4,620 million at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively, which exceeded the amount required by $4,295 million and $4,460 million, respectively.
Morgan Stanley & Co. International plc (MSIP), a London-based broker-dealer subsidiary, is subject to the capital requirements of the Prudential Regulation Authority, and Morgan Stanley MUFG Securities Co., Ltd. (MSMS), a Tokyo-based broker-dealer subsidiary, is subject to the capital requirements of the Financial Services Agency. MSIP and MSMS have consistently operated with capital in excess of their respective regulatory capital requirements.
Other Regulated Subsidiaries.
Certain other U.S. and non-U.S. subsidiaries of the Company are subject to various securities, commodities and banking regulations, and capital adequacy requirements promulgated by the regulatory and exchange authorities of the countries in which they operate. These subsidiaries have consistently operated with capital in excess of their local capital adequacy requirements.
Morgan Stanley Derivative Products Inc. (MSDP), a derivative products subsidiary rated A1 by Moodys and AA- by S&P, maintains certain operating restrictions that have been reviewed by Moodys and S&P. MSDP is operated such that creditors of the Company should not expect to have any claims on the assets of MSDP, unless and until the obligations to its own creditors are satisfied in full. Creditors of MSDP should not expect to have any claims on the assets of the Company or any of its affiliates, other than the respective assets of MSDP.
Dividends and Share Repurchases.
In March 2015, the Company received no objection from the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the Federal Reserve) to its 2015 capital plan. The capital plan included a share repurchase of up to $3.1 billion of the Companys outstanding common stock that began in the second quarter of 2015 through the end of the second quarter of 2016. Additionally, the capital plan included an increase in the Companys quarterly common stock dividend to $0.15 per share from $0.10 per share that began with the dividend declared on April 20, 2015. During the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Company repurchased approximately $625 million and $1,500 million, respectively. During the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2014, the Company repurchased approximately $195 million and $629 million, respectively, of the Companys outstanding common stock as part of its share repurchase program.
Pursuant to the share repurchase program, the Company considers, among other things, business segment capital needs as well as equity-based compensation and benefit plan requirements. Share repurchases under the Companys program will be exercised from time to time at prices the Company deems appropriate subject to various factors, including the Companys capital position and market conditions. The share repurchases may be effected through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions, including through Rule 10b5-1 plans, and may be suspended at any time. Share repurchases by the Company are subject to regulatory approval.
Preferred Stock.
Series J Preferred Stock.
On March 19, 2015, the Company issued 1,500,000 Depositary Shares, for an aggregate price of $1,500 million. Each Depositary Share represents a 1/25th interest in a share of perpetual Fixed-to-Floating Rate Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series J, $0.01 par value (Series J Preferred Stock). The Series J Preferred Stock is redeemable at the Companys option, (i) in whole or in part, from time to time, on any dividend payment date on or after July 15, 2020 or (ii) in whole but not in part at any time within 90 days following a regulatory capital treatment event (as described in the terms of that series), in each case at a redemption price of $25,000 per share (equivalent to $1,000 per Depositary Share), plus any declared and unpaid dividends up to, but excluding, the date fixed for redemption, without accumulation of any undeclared dividends. The Series J Preferred Stock also has a preference over the Companys common stock upon liquidation. The Series J Preferred Stock offering (net of related issuance costs) resulted in proceeds of approximately $1,493 million.
For a description of Series A through Series I preferred stock issuances, see Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements in the 2014 Form 10-K.
The Company is authorized to issue 30 million shares of preferred stock. At September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Companys preferred stock outstanding consisted of the following (dollars in millions, except per share data):
Series
C
E
F
G
H
I
J
The Companys preferred stock qualifies as Tier 1 capital in accordance with regulatory capital requirements (see Note 13).
During the quarters ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, dividends declared on the Companys outstanding preferred stock were $78 million and $62 million, respectively. During the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, dividends declared on the Companys outstanding preferred stock were $297 million and $192 million, respectively.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss).
The following tables present changes in AOCI by component, net of noncontrolling interests, during the quarters ended September 30, 2015 and 2014:
Balance at June 30, 2015
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications
Amounts reclassified from AOCI
Net other comprehensive income (loss) during the period
Balance at June 30, 2014
The Company had no significant reclassifications out of AOCI during the quarters ended September 30, 2015 and 2014.
The following table presents changes in AOCI by component, net of noncontrolling interests, during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014:
The Company had no significant reclassifications out of AOCI during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014.
Nonredeemable Noncontrolling Interests.
Nonredeemable noncontrolling interests were $1,133 million and $1,204 million at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. The reduction in nonredeemable noncontrolling interests was primarily due to the deconsolidation of certain legal entities associated with real estate funds sponsored by the Company in the second quarters of 2015 and 2014.
Basic earnings per common share (EPS) is computed by dividing earnings applicable to Morgan Stanley common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Common shares outstanding include common stock and vested restricted stock units (RSUs) where recipients have satisfied either the explicit vesting terms or retirement eligibility requirements. Diluted EPS reflects the assumed conversion of all dilutive securities. The Company calculates EPS using the two-class method, which allocates a portion of the Companys earnings to instruments granted in share-based payment transactions that are considered participating securities (see Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements in the 2014 Form 10-K). The following table presents the calculation of basic and diluted EPS (in millions, except for per share data):
Basic EPS:
Less: Preferred dividends
Less: Allocation of (earnings) loss to participating RSUs(1):
From continuing operations
Weighted average common shares outstanding
Diluted EPS:
Effect of dilutive securities:
Stock options and RSUs(1)
Weighted average common shares outstanding and common stock equivalents
The following securities were considered antidilutive and, therefore, were excluded from the computation of diluted EPS:
Number of Antidilutive Securities Outstanding at End of Period:
Stock options
RSUs and performance-based stock units
Details of Interest income and Interest expense were as follows:
Interest income(1):
Trading assets(2)
Investment securities
Loans
Securities purchased under agreements to resell and Securities borrowed(3)
Customer receivables and Other(4)
Total interest income
Interest expense(1):
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase and Securities loaned(5)
Customer payables and Other(6)
Total interest expense
The Company sponsors various pension plans for the majority of its U.S. and non-U.S. employees. The Company provides certain other postretirement benefits, primarily health care and life insurance, to eligible U.S. employees. The Company also provides certain postemployment benefits to certain former employees or inactive employees prior to retirement.
The components of the Companys net periodic benefit expense for its pension and postretirement plans were as follows:
Service cost, benefits earned during the period
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation
Expected return on plan assets
Net amortization of prior service cost (credit)
Net amortization of actuarial loss
Curtailment loss
Net periodic benefit expense
The Company is under continuous examination by the Internal Revenue Service (the IRS) and other tax authorities in certain countries, such as Japan and the United Kingdom (U.K.), and in states in which the Company has significant business operations, such as New York. The Company is currently at various levels of field examination with respect to audits by the IRS, as well as New York State and New York City, for tax years 20092012 and 20072009, respectively. The IRS has substantially completed the field examination for the audit of tax years 20062008. The Company believes that the resolution of these tax matters will not have a material effect on the Companys condensed consolidated statements of financial condition, although a resolution could have a material impact on the Companys condensed consolidated statements of income for a particular future period and on the effective tax rate for any period in which such resolution occurs.
During the third quarter of 2015, the IRS completed an Appeals Office review of matters from tax years 1999-2005 and submitted a final report to the Congressional Joint Committee on Taxation for approval. The Company has reserved the right to contest certain items, the resolution of which is not expected to have a material impact on the effective tax rate or the Companys condensed consolidated financial statements.
During 2016, the Company expects to reach a conclusion with the U.K. tax authorities on substantially all issues through tax year 2010, the resolution of which is not expected to have a material impact on the effective tax rate or the Companys condensed consolidated financial statements.
The Company has established a liability for unrecognized tax benefits that the Company believes is adequate in relation to the potential for additional assessments. Once established, the Company adjusts unrecognized tax benefits only when more information is available or when an event occurs necessitating a change.
It is reasonably possible that significant changes in the gross balance of unrecognized tax benefits may occur within the next 12 months related to certain tax authority examinations referred to above. At this time, however, it is not possible to reasonably estimate the expected change to the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits and impact on the Companys effective tax rate over the next 12 months.
The Companys effective tax rate from continuing operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 included a net discrete tax benefit of $564 million. This net discrete tax benefit was primarily associated with the repatriation of non-U.S. earnings at a cost lower than originally estimated due to an internal restructuring to simplify the Companys legal entity organization in the U.K.
The Companys effective tax rate from continuing operations for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2014 included a net discrete tax benefit of $237 million primarily associated with the repatriation of non-U.S. earnings at a cost lower than originally estimated. Additionally, the Companys effective tax rate from continuing operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 included a net discrete tax benefit of $609 million principally associated with remeasurement of reserves and related interest due to new information regarding the status of the IRS field examination referred to above.
Segment Information.
For a discussion about the Companys business segments, see Note 21 to the consolidated financial statements in the 2014 Form 10-K.
Selected financial information for the Companys business segments is presented below:
Total non-interest revenues(1)(2)
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
Income (loss) from continuing operations
Net income (loss)
Net income (loss) applicable to Morgan Stanley
Total non-interest revenues(1)(4)(5)
Provision for income taxes(6)
Total Assets(1)
At December 31, 2014
Geographic Information.
For a discussion about the Companys geographic net revenues, see Note 21 to the consolidated financial statements in the 2014 Form 10-K.
Net Revenues
Americas
EMEA
Asia-Pacific
The Company has evaluated subsequent events for adjustment to or disclosure in its condensed consolidated financial statements through the date of this report, and has not identified any recordable or disclosable events, not otherwise reported in these condensed consolidated financial statements or the notes thereto, except for the following:
The Company closed the sale of its global oil merchanting unit of the commodities division to Castleton Commodities International LLC on November 1, 2015.
Common Stock Dividend.
On October 19, 2015, the Company announced that its Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend per common share of $0.15. The dividend is payable on November 13, 2015 to common shareholders of record on October 30, 2015 (see Note 14).
Subsequent to September 30, 2015 and through October 30, 2015, the Companys long-term borrowings decreased by approximately $2.3 billion, net of issuances.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Morgan Stanley:
We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of financial condition of Morgan Stanley and subsidiaries (the Company) as of September 30, 2015, and the related condensed consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, and the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows and changes in total equity for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2015 and 2014. These interim condensed consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the management of the Company.
We conducted our reviews in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to such condensed consolidated financial statements for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated statement of financial condition of the Company as of December 31, 2014, and the consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, cash flows and changes in total equity for the year then ended (not presented herein) included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K; and in our report dated March 2, 2015, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of financial condition as of December 31, 2014 is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated statement of financial condition from which it has been derived.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
New York, New York
November 3, 2015
Introduction.
A brief summary of the activities of each of the Companys business segments is as follows:
Institutional Securities provides financial advisory and capital-raising services, including: advice on mergers and acquisitions, restructurings, real estate and project finance; corporate lending; sales, trading, financing and market-making activities in equity and fixed income securities and related products, including foreign exchange and commodities; and investment activities.
Wealth Management provides brokerage and investment advisory services to individual investors and small-to-medium sized businesses and institutions covering various investment alternatives; financial and wealth planning services; annuity and other insurance products; credit and other lending products; cash management services; and retirement services; and engages in fixed income trading, which primarily facilitates clients trading or investments in such securities.
Investment Management provides a broad array of investment strategies that span the risk/return spectrum across geographies, asset classes, and public and private markets to a diverse group of clients across the institutional and intermediary channels as well as high net worth clients.
The results of operations in the past have been, and in the future may continue to be, materially affected by many factors, including: the effect of economic and political conditions and geopolitical events; sovereign risk; the effect of market conditions, particularly in the global equity, fixed income, currency, credit and commodities markets, including corporate and mortgage (commercial and residential) lending and commercial real estate markets and energy markets; the impact of current, pending and future legislation (including the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the Dodd-Frank Act)), regulation (including capital, leverage and liquidity requirements), policies (including fiscal and monetary), and legal and regulatory actions in the United States of America (U.S.) and worldwide; the level and volatility of equity, fixed income and commodity prices (including oil prices), interest rates, currency values and other market indices; the availability and cost of both credit and capital as well as the credit ratings assigned to the Companys unsecured short-term and long-term debt; investor, consumer and business sentiment and confidence in the financial markets; the performance of the Companys acquisitions, divestitures, joint ventures, strategic alliances or other strategic arrangements; the Companys reputation and the general perception of the financial services industry; inflation, natural disasters, pandemics and acts of war or terrorism; the actions and initiatives of current and potential competitors as well as governments, regulators and self-regulatory organizations; the effectiveness of the Companys risk management policies; technological changes and risks and cybersecurity risks (including cyber attacks and business continuity risks); or a combination of these or other factors. In addition, legislative, legal and regulatory developments related to the Companys businesses are likely to increase costs, thereby affecting results of operations. These factors also may have an adverse impact on the Companys ability to achieve its strategic objectives. For a further discussion of these and other important factors that could affect the Companys business, see BusinessCompetition and BusinessSupervision and Regulation in Part I, Item 1, Risk Factors in Part I, Item 1A of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 (the 2014 Form 10-K) and Liquidity and Capital ResourcesRegulatory Requirements herein.
The discussion of the Companys results of operations below may contain forward-looking statements. These statements, which reflect managements beliefs and expectations, are subject to risks and uncertainties that may
cause actual results to differ materially. For a discussion of the risks and uncertainties that may affect the Companys future results, see Forward-Looking Statements immediately preceding Part I, Item 1, BusinessCompetition and BusinessSupervision and Regulation in Part I, Item 1, Risk Factors in Part I, Item 1A of the 2014 Form 10-K and Liquidity and Capital ResourcesRegulatory Requirements herein.
Executive Summary.
Overview of Financial Results.
Consolidated Results for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2015.
The Company reported net revenues of $7,767 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2015 (current quarter) compared with $8,907 million in the quarter ended September 30, 2014 (prior year quarter). Net revenues in the current quarter included positive revenues due to the impact of debt valuation adjustment (DVA) of $435 million compared with positive revenues of $215 million in the prior year quarter. For the current quarter, net income applicable to Morgan Stanley was $1,018 million, or $0.48 per diluted common share, compared with net income of $1,693 million, or $0.83 per diluted common share, for the prior year quarter. The earnings for the prior year quarter included a net discrete tax benefit of $237 million or $0.12 per diluted common share, primarily associated with the repatriation of non-U.S. earnings at a cost lower than originally estimated.
Excluding DVA, net revenues for the current quarter were $7,332 million compared with $8,692 million in the prior year quarter. Excluding DVA and the net discrete tax benefit in the prior year quarter, net income applicable to Morgan Stanley was $740 million, or $0.34 per diluted common share in the current quarter, compared with $1,319 million, or $0.64 per diluted common share in the prior year quarter.
Net revenues of $7,767 million were 13% lower than the prior year quarter. Institutional Securities net revenues were $3,904 million in the current quarter, down 14% compared with $4,516 million in the prior year quarter, primarily as a result of lower underwriting revenues, lower fixed income product sales and trading net revenues and lower Other revenues. Wealth Management net revenues of $3,640 million in the current quarter decreased 4% from $3,773 million in the prior year quarter, primarily as a result of lower transactional revenues and lower Other revenues, partially offset by an increase in net interest income. Investment Management net revenues were $274 million in the current quarter, down 59% from $667 million in the prior year quarter, primarily reflecting the reversal of previously accrued carried interest associated with Asia private equity and lower results in the Traditional Asset Management business.
Total non-interest expenses of $6,293 million in the current quarter were down 6% compared to the prior year quarter. Compensation expenses of $3,437 million in the current quarter decreased 18% from $4,214 million in the prior year quarter. The decrease was due to a combination of a decrease in discretionary incentive compensation driven by lower revenues, a decrease in amortization due to accelerated vesting of certain awards during the fourth quarter of 2014 and a decrease in fair value of deferred compensation plan referenced investments and carried interest, partially offset by a reduction of average deferral rates for discretionary incentive based awards. Non-compensation expenses were $2,856 million during the current quarter, compared with $2,473 million in the prior year quarter, representing a 15% increase primarily as a result of an increase in Other non-interest expenses related to the settlement of a credit default swap (CDS) antitrust litigation matter in the Companys Institutional Securities business segment and other matters.
The annualized return on average common equity from continuing operations was 5.6% in the current quarter, or 3.9% excluding DVA. The annualized return on average common equity from continuing operations for the prior year quarter was 9.9%, or 8.9% excluding DVA, and 7.5% excluding DVA and the net discrete tax benefit.
Consolidated Results for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Company reported net revenues of $27,417 million compared with $26,511 million in the prior year period. Net revenues in the current nine-month period included
positive revenues due to the impact of DVA of $742 million compared with positive revenues of $428 million in the prior year period. For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, net income applicable to Morgan Stanley was $5,219 million, or $2.51 per diluted common share, compared with net income applicable to Morgan Stanley of $5,097 million, or $2.49 per diluted common share, in the prior year period. The earnings for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 included a net discrete tax benefit of $564 million or $0.29 per diluted common share, associated with the repatriation of non-U.S. earnings at a cost lower than originally estimated. The earnings for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 included a net discrete tax benefit of $846 million or $0.43 per diluted common share, composed of a net discrete tax benefit primarily associated with the repatriation of non-U.S. earnings at a cost lower than originally estimated and a net discrete tax benefit principally associated with remeasurement of reserves and related interest due to new information regarding the status of a multi-year tax authority examination.
Excluding DVA, net revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 were $26,675 million compared with $26,083 million in the prior year period. Excluding DVA and the net discrete tax benefit in each period, net income applicable to Morgan Stanley was $4,178 million, or $1.98 per diluted common share for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, compared with $3,978 million, or $1.92 per diluted common share in the prior year period.
Net revenues of $27,417 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 were up 3% compared to the prior year period. Institutional Securities net revenues were $14,534 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, up 8% compared with $13,441 million in the prior year period, resulting primarily from higher sales and trading net revenues for equity products. Wealth Management net revenues of $11,349 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 increased 2% from $11,084 million a year ago as a result of an increase in net interest income and higher asset management revenues, partially offset by lower transactional revenues. Investment Management net revenues were $1,694 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, down 20% from $2,124 million in the prior year period, primarily reflecting the reversal of previously accrued carried interest and markdowns on principal investments in the Companys Merchant Banking and Real Estate Investing businesses and lower net investment gains in the Traditional Asset Management business.
Total non-interest expenses of $20,361 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 were up 2% compared to the prior year period. Compensation expenses of $12,366 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 decreased 3% from $12,720 million in the prior year period primarily due to a decrease in amortization resulting from accelerated vesting of certain awards during the fourth quarter of 2014 and a decrease in the fair value of deferred compensation plan referenced investments and carried interest, partially offset by an increase in discretionary incentive compensation driven by higher revenues and a reduction of average deferral rates for discretionary incentive based awards. Non-compensation expenses were $7,995 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, compared with $7,269 million in the prior year period, representing a 10% increase due to higher Other non-interest expenses and higher Professional services expenses.
The annualized return on average common equity from continuing operations was 9.9% for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, or 8.8% excluding DVA and 7.7% excluding DVA and the net discrete tax benefit. The annualized return on average common equity from continuing operations for the prior year period was 10.1%, or 9.4% excluding DVA, and 7.7% excluding DVA and the net discrete tax benefit.
Financial Information and Statistical Data (dollars in millions, except where noted and per share amounts).
Net revenues:
Institutional Securities
Wealth Management(1)
Investment Management(1)
Intersegment Eliminations
Consolidated net revenues
Income (loss) from continuing operations applicable to Morgan Stanley:
Institutional Securities(2)
Investment Management(1)(2)
Income from continuing operations applicable to Morgan Stanley
Income (loss) from discontinued operations applicable to Morgan Stanley
Preferred stock dividend and other
Earnings per basic common share(3)
Earnings per diluted common share(3)
Regional net revenues(4):
Effective income tax rate from continuing operations
Total loans(5)
Global Liquidity Reserve managed by bank and non-bank legal entities(6):
Bank legal entities
Non-bank legal entities
Total deposits
Maturities of long-term borrowings outstanding (next 12 months)
Book value per common share(7)
Capital ratios (Advanced/Transitional)(8):
Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio
Tier 1 capital ratio
Total capital ratio
Tier 1 leverage ratio(9)
Assets under management or supervision (dollars in billions)(1)(10)(11):
Wealth Management
Investment Management
Worldwide employees
Selected Non-GAAP Financial Information (dollars in millions, except where noted and per share amounts)(12).
Pre-tax profit margin(13):
Consolidated
Average common equity (dollars in billions)(14):
Parent capital
Consolidated average common equity
Return on average common equity from continuing operations(15):
Average tangible common equity (dollars in billions)(16)
Return on average tangible common equity from continuing operations(17)
Selected financial measures excluding DVA:
Return on average common equity from continuing operations(15)
Tangible book value per common share(18)
Reconciliation of selected financial measures from a non-GAAP to a U.S. GAAP basis (dollars in millions, except per share amounts)(12).
Net revenuesnon-GAAP
Impact of DVA
Net revenuesU.S. GAAP
Net income applicable to Morgan Stanley, excluding DVA and net discrete tax benefitnon-GAAP
Impact of net discrete tax benefit
Net income applicable to Morgan Stanley, excluding DVAnon-GAAP
Net income applicable to Morgan StanleyU.S. GAAP
Earnings per diluted common share, excluding DVA and net discrete tax benefitnon-GAAP
Earnings per diluted common share, excluding DVAnon-GAAP
Earnings per diluted common shareU.S. GAAP
Effective income tax rate from continuing operationsnon-GAAP
Effective income tax rate from continuing operationsU.S. GAAP
Return on average common equity, excluding DVA and net discrete tax benefit(15)
Return on average common equity, excluding DVA(15)
Return on average common equity(15)
U.S. GAAPAccounting principles generally accepted in the U.S.
DVADebt Valuation Adjustment represents the change in the fair value of certain of the Companys long-term and short-term borrowings resulting from the fluctuation in the Companys credit spreads and other credit factors.
N/MNot Meaningful.
Return on Equity Goal.
The Company is aiming to improve its returns to shareholders with a goal of achieving a sustainable 10% or more return on average common equity excluding DVA (Return on Equity) over time, subject to the successful execution of its strategic objectives. For further information on the Companys Return on Equity goal, see Other MattersReturn on Equity Goal in Part II, Item 7 of the 2014 Form 10-K.
Global Market and Economic Conditions.
Global economic growth decelerated during the third quarter 2015 as a result of slower growth in emerging market (EM) economies, including a deceleration in China and recessions in Brazil and Russia. Growth in major developed market (DM) economies held up better than the EM economies, which were supported by continued easing of monetary policy, but were affected by weaker EM growth and weaker EM currencies. The consumer price indexes (CPI) in the largest DM economies remained near or below zero in September of 2015 following renewed weakness in energy prices during the third quarter of 2015. China continued to experience entrenched producer price index deflation, while other EM economies showed mixed inflation trends, high inflation in commodity export EMs facing deteriorating terms of trade and weaker currencies and low inflation in commodity import EMs. Global equity markets declined substantially in the aggregate during the third quarter of 2015, driven in part by the devaluation of the Chinese currency and concerns surrounding the timing of a potential increase of U.S. interest rates.
In the U.S., a 3.9% annualized increase in real gross domestic product (GDP) in the second quarter of 2015 following a 0.6% gain in the first quarter, resulted in an annualized GDP growth rate of 2.3% for the first half of 2015. Economic growth in the third quarter of 2015 slowed to a 1.5% annualized rate, as a slowdown in the buildup of business inventory and a deceleration in exports from a strong dollar was offset by solid gains in
consumer spending. The unemployment rate fell to 5.1% in September 2015 from 5.3% in June 2015. As of September 30, 2015, the federal funds rate target range remained between 0.00% and 0.25%, while the discount rate remained at 0.75%, unchanged from June 30, 2015. The S&P 500 stock index declined 6.9%, the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 7.6%, and the NASDAQ Composite index fell by 7.4% during the third quarter of 2015. The 10-year Treasury note yield declined to 2.06% at September 30, 2015 from 2.35% at June 30, 2015. The Federal Reserve Boards nominal broad dollar index rose 4.6% from June 30, 2015 to September 30, 2015.
In Europe, the cyclical recovery continued with a 0.4% gain in euro area GDP growth in the second quarter of 2015 after a 0.5% rise in the first quarter of 2015, aided in part by the European Central Banks (ECB) quantitative easing programs support for credit availability. Monthly economic data in the third quarter of 2015 showed resilience following the resolution to the Greek debt crisis in July 2015. However, the drag from external conditions, lower commodity prices, and rising uncertainty about global economic growth led the ECB to describe risks to the euro zone economic growth and inflation outlook as tilted to the downside at its September 3, 2015 policy meeting. As of September 30, 2015, the ECBs deposit facility rate was at negative 0.20% and the benchmark interest rate was at 0.05%, both unchanged from June 30, 2015. ECB asset purchases continued at a 60 billion per month pace and were confirmed to continue at least through September 2016. The STOXX Europe 600 index fell 8.8% in the third quarter of 2015 after falling 4.0% in the second quarter of 2015, reversing most of a 16.0% gain during the first quarter of 2015. The 10-year German Bund yield fell to 0.59% on September 30, 2015 from 0.76% on June 30, 2015. In the United Kingdom (U.K.), annual inflation fell back slightly below zero in September 2015, as weakness in externally-driven goods inflation offset firmer services inflation supported by tightening labor markets. In the U.K., GDP accelerated to 0.7% in the second quarter of 2015 from 0.4% in the first quarter of 2015. The Bank of Englands benchmark interest rate remained at 0.50% as of September 30, 2015, unchanged from June 30, 2015. The FTSE 100 index declined 7.0% from June 30, 2015 to September 30, 2015, and the 10-year gilt yield fell to 1.79% from 2.16% over this period.
In Japan, declines in industrial production in July and August of 2015 pointed to a second straight quarterly drop in the third quarter of 2015. Nationwide CPI was at 0.2% on a year over year basis in August of 2015. In the policy statement released after its September 14-15, 2015 policy meeting, the Bank of Japan announced that inflation expectations appear to be rising on the whole and highlighted a drag on exports and production from EM economies. The NIKKEI 225 equity index fell 14.1% from June 30, 2015 to September 30, 2015 and the 10-year Japanese government bond yield fell to 0.35% from 0.45% over this period.
Economic growth in EM economies, particularly in China, in aggregate remained challenged during the third quarter of 2015 by cyclical and structural headwinds. Cyclical headwinds included slower economic growth in China, lower commodity prices, and risks looking ahead to the expected start of U.S. monetary policy normalization, while structural headwinds included demographic challenges and high debt levels. In China, GDP grew to 6.9% during the third quarter of 2015. The producer price index registered a 5.9% year over year decline in September 2015, continuing entrenched deflation at the producer level. The Peoples Bank of China (PBOC) reduced its 1-year lending rate by 25 basis points to 4.60% effective August 26, 2015, bringing the cumulative reduction in the past year to 140 basis points. The PBOC also announced a 2% lower daily fixing in Chinese renminbi versus the U.S. dollar on August 11, 2015 and a shift in regime to adjusting the daily central parity fixing. The Shanghai Stock Exchange Composite Index fell 28.6% between June 30, 2015 and September 30, 2015, and the Chinese renminbi per U.S. dollar exchange rate moved to 6.36 from 6.20 over that period.
Business Segments.
Substantially all of the Companys operating revenues and operating expenses are directly attributable to its business segments. Certain revenues and expenses have been allocated to each business segment, generally in proportion to its respective net revenues, non-interest expenses or other relevant measures.
As a result of treating certain intersegment transactions as transactions with external parties, the Company includes an Intersegment Eliminations category to reconcile the business segment results to the Companys consolidated results. Intersegment Eliminations also reflect the effect of fees paid by the Companys Institutional Securities business segment to the Companys Wealth Management business segment related to the bank deposit program.
Net Revenues.
For a discussion of the Companys net revenues, see Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A)Business SegmentsNet Revenues in Part II, Item 7 of the 2014 Form 10-K.
Compensation Expense.
For a discussion of the Companys compensation expense, see MD&ABusiness SegmentsCompensation Expense in Part II, Item 7 of the 2014 Form 10-K.
INSTITUTIONAL SECURITIES
INCOME STATEMENT INFORMATION
Non-compensation expenses
Income (losses) from discontinued operations
Amounts applicable to Morgan Stanley:
Investment Banking Revenues.
Investment banking revenues are composed of fees from advisory services and revenues from the underwriting of securities offerings and syndication of loans, net of syndication expenses.
Investment banking revenues were as follows:
Advisory revenues
Underwriting revenues:
Equity underwriting revenues
Fixed income underwriting revenues
Total underwriting revenues
Total investment banking revenues
The following table presents the Companys volumes of announced and completed mergers and acquisitions, equity and equity-related offerings, and fixed income offerings:
Announced mergers and acquisitions(2)
Completed mergers and acquisitions(2)
Equity and equity-related offerings(3)
Fixed income offerings(4)
Investment banking revenues during the current quarter decreased 12% from the prior year quarter reflecting decreases in equity and fixed income underwriting, partially offset by higher advisory revenues. Advisory revenues from announced merger, acquisition and restructuring transactions (M&A) were $557 million during the current quarter, an increase of 42% from the prior year quarter, driven by increased M&A activity primarily in the Americas. Underwriting revenues of $624 million decreased 34% from the prior year quarter. Equity underwriting revenues decreased 46% to $250 million for the current quarter reflecting a decrease in initial public offering revenues. Fixed income underwriting revenues of $374 million decreased 23% from the prior year quarter, primarily driven by lower debt underwriting volumes.
Investment banking revenues during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 decreased 3% from the comparable period in 2014 driven by lower underwriting revenues partially offset by higher advisory revenues. Advisory revenues increased 27% led by M&A activity primarily in the Americas. Underwriting revenues during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 decreased 15% to $2,343 million from the comparable period of
2014. Equity underwriting revenues decreased 18% to $1,046 million reflecting decreases in initial public offering volumes. Fixed income underwriting revenues decreased 13% to $1,297 million, primarily driven by lower non-investment grade bond and loan revenues.
Sales and Trading Net Revenues.
Sales and trading net revenues are composed of Trading revenues; Commissions and fees; Asset management, distribution and administration fees; and Net interest income (expenses). For a discussion of the Companys Net revenues, see MD&ABusiness SegmentsNet Revenues in Part II, Item 7 of the 2014 Form 10-K. For additional information on the Companys Institutional Securities sales and trading net revenues, see MD&ABusiness SegmentsInstitutional SecuritiesSales and Trading Net Revenues in Part II, Item 7 of the 2014 Form 10-K. See also Note 4 to the Companys condensed consolidated financial statements in Item 1 for further information related to gains (losses) on derivative instruments.
Sales and trading net revenues were as follows:
Total sales and trading net revenues
Sales and trading net revenues by business were as follows:
Fixed income and commodities
Other(1)
The following sales and trading net revenues results exclude the impact of DVA. The reconciliation of sales and trading, including equity sales and trading and fixed income and commodities sales and trading net revenues, from a non-GAAP to a GAAP basis is as follows:
Total sales and trading net revenuesnon-GAAP(1)
Equity sales and trading net revenuesnon-GAAP(1)
Equity sales and trading net revenues
Fixed income and commodities sales and trading net revenuesnon-GAAP(1)
Fixed income and commodities sales and trading net revenues
Sales and Trading Net Revenues during the Quarter Ended September 30, 2015. Total sales and trading net revenues decreased 7% to $2,722 million during the current quarter from $2,913 million during the prior year quarter.
Equity. Equity sales and trading net revenues was essentially unchanged at $1,869 million during the current quarter from $1,867 million in the prior year quarter. Equity sales and trading net revenues, excluding the impact of DVA, decreased 1% to $1,769 million during the current quarter from $1,784 million in the prior year quarter, primarily reflecting lower revenues from cash equities products offset by solid results in derivatives products and prime brokerage. The decline in cash equities reflected a challenging market environment during the current quarter. The improved results in derivatives primarily reflected increased client activity, while the increase in prime brokerage results was driven by higher client balances and increased client activity across regions.
Fixed Income and Commodities. Fixed income and commodities sales and trading net revenues decreased 19% to $918 million during the current quarter from $1,129 million during the prior year quarter. Excluding the impact of DVA, fixed income and commodities sales and trading net revenues decreased 42% to $583 million during the current quarter from $997 million during the prior year quarter primarily reflecting lower fixed income product net revenues which were partially offset by higher commodity net revenues. Fixed income product net revenues, excluding the impact of DVA, during the current quarter decreased 55% from the prior year quarter reflecting lower revenues across all major product lines. Difficult market conditions resulted in lower revenues due to the widening of credit spreads in securitized products and distressed debt, and lower client activity in structured credit and interest rate products. Commodity net revenues, excluding the impact of DVA, during the current quarter improved from the prior year quarter, as a result of improved client flow and oil market volatility.
Fixed income and commodities sales and trading net revenues during the current quarter included losses of $56 million, net of hedges, related to credit valuation adjustments (CVA) and funding valuation adjustments (FVA) as a result of changes in the fair value of net derivative and certain other contracts attributable to counterparties CDS spreads and the Companys CDS spreads and other factors compared with gains of $68 million, net of hedges, during the prior year quarter. The Company began incorporating FVA into the fair value measurements of over-the-counter (OTC) uncollateralized and certain other derivatives during the fourth quarter of 2014.
Other. During the current quarter, other sales and trading reflected negative net revenues of $65 million compared with negative net revenues of $83 million during the prior year quarter. Losses related to negative carry, losses related to investments associated with certain employee deferred compensation plans, and losses on economic hedges and other costs related to the Companys long-term borrowings, partially offset by net revenues from corporate loans and lending commitments and related hedges.
Sales and Trading Net Revenues during the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015. Total sales and trading net revenues increased 17% to $10,309 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 from $8,800 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2014.
Equity. Equity sales and trading net revenues increased 19% to $6,504 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 from the comparable period in 2014. Equity sales and trading net revenues, excluding the impact of DVA, increased 19% to $6,307 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 from the comparable period in 2014, reflecting strong results in prime brokerage and derivatives products. Improved results in derivatives reflected favorable market conditions and increased client activity, while higher client balances primarily drove the increase in prime brokerage results.
Fixed Income and Commodities. Fixed income and commodities sales and trading net revenues increased 10% to $4,298 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 from $3,920 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2014. Excluding the impact of DVA, fixed income and commodities sales and trading net revenues increased 2% to $3,753 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 from $3,662 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2014. Fixed income product net revenues, excluding the impact of DVA, during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 increased 1% from the comparable period of 2014 as higher revenues in interest rate and foreign exchange products were partially offset by lower results in credit and securitized products. Commodity net revenues, excluding the impact of DVA, during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 increased from the comparable period of 2014, primarily reflecting increased structured client activity. The net improvement was partially offset by the absence of revenues from TransMontaigne Inc. (TransMontaigne), which was sold on July 1, 2014.
Fixed income and commodities sales and trading net revenues during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 included gains of $54 million, net of hedges, related to CVA and FVA as a result of changes in the fair value of net derivative and certain other contracts attributable to counterparties CDS spreads and the Companys CDS spreads and other factors compared with gains of $18 million, net of hedges, during the nine months ended September 30, 2014. The Company began incorporating FVA into the fair value measurements of OTC uncollateralized and certain other derivatives during the fourth quarter of 2014.
Other. During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, other sales and trading reflected negative net revenues of $493 million compared with negative net revenues of $568 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2014. Results in both periods included losses related to negative carry, losses related to investments associated with certain employee deferred compensation plans and losses on economic hedges and other costs related to the Companys long-term borrowings, partially offset by net revenues from corporate loans and lending commitments and related hedges.
Investments Revenues.
Net investment gains of $113 million and $241 million were recognized during the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively, compared with net investment gains of $39 million and $210 million for the comparable periods in 2014. The increases in both periods were driven by gains on business related investments.
Other Revenues.
Negative revenues of $112 million were recognized in Other revenues during the current quarter compared with revenues of $224 million for the prior year quarter, reflecting primarily write-downs on held for sale loans and lending commitments. The results for the prior year quarter also included a $101 million gain on the sale of the Companys stake in TransMontaigne and a gain on the sale of a retail property space of $84 million.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, Other revenues were $190 million compared with $523 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2014. The decrease was primarily due to write-downs on held for sale loans and lending commitments. The results for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 also included a $101 million gain on the sale of the Companys stake in TransMontaigne, an $84 million gain on sale of a retail property space and a $45 million gain on the sale of Canterm Canadian Terminals Inc. which was completed on March 27, 2014 (see Note 1 to the Companys condensed consolidated financial statements in Item 1).
Non-interest Expenses.
Non-interest expenses decreased 2% during the current quarter from the prior year quarter. The decrease in the current quarter was primarily due to lower Compensation and benefits expenses partially offset by an increase in Non-compensation expenses. Compensation and benefits expenses decreased 26% during the current quarter compared with prior year quarter. The decrease was due to the combination of a decrease in discretionary incentive compensation driven by lower revenues, a decrease in amortization due to accelerated vesting of certain awards during the fourth quarter of 2014 and a decrease in fair value of deferred compensation plan referenced investments, partially offset by the reduction of average deferral rates for discretionary incentive based awards. Non-compensation expenses increased 26% during the current quarter compared with the prior year quarter, primarily as a result of an increase in Other non-interest expenses, related to an increase in a reserve for the settlement of a CDS antitrust litigation and other matters (see Legal Proceedings in Part II, Item 1).
During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, Non-interest expenses increased 6% from the comparable period in 2014. The increase in the nine months ended September 30, 2015 was primarily due to higher Non-compensation expenses, which was partially offset by lower Compensation and benefits expenses. Compensation and benefits expenses decreased 2% during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 from the comparable period in 2014. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in amortization resulting from accelerated vesting of certain awards during the fourth quarter of 2014 and a decrease in the fair value of deferred compensation plan referenced investments, partially offset by an increase in discretionary incentive compensation driven by higher revenues and the reduction of average deferral rates for discretionary incentive based awards. Non-compensation expenses during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 increased 15%, due to higher litigation reserves and higher Professional services expenses.
Nonredeemable noncontrolling interests primarily relate to Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.s interest in Morgan Stanley MUFG Securities Co., Ltd. (see Note 8 to the Companys condensed consolidated financial statements in Item 1).
As a result of entering into a definitive agreement to sell the global oil merchanting unit of the commodities division to Castleton Commodities International LLC, on May 11, 2015, the Company recognized an impairment charge of $10 million and $69 million in Other revenues in the Companys condensed consolidated statements of income in the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively, to reduce the carrying amount of the unit to its estimated fair value less costs to sell. The Company closed the transaction on November 1, 2015. The transaction does not meet the criteria for discontinued operations and is not expected to have a material impact on the Companys financial results for 2015.
WEALTH MANAGEMENT
Financial Information and Statistical Data (dollars in billions, except where noted).
Client assets
Fee-based client assets(1)
Fee-based client assets as a percentage of total client assets(1)
Client liabilities
Bank deposit program(2)
Investment securities portfolio
Wealth Management representatives
Retail locations
Annualized revenues per representative (dollars in thousands)(4)
Client assets per representative (dollars in millions)(5)
Fee-based asset flows(6)
Wealth Management earns fees based on a contractual percentage of fee-based client assets related to certain account types, which are offered to Wealth Management clients. These fees, which the Company records in the Asset management, distribution and administrative fees line on its income statement, are earned based on the client assets in the specific account types in which the client participates and are generally not driven by asset class. For most account types, fees are billed in the first month of each quarter based on the related client assets as of the end of the prior quarter. Across the account types, the fees will vary based on both the distinct services provided within each account type and on the level of household assets under supervision in Wealth Management. The following tables present fee-based client assets activity and average fee rate by account type in the Companys Wealth Management business segment for the quarters and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014.
Separately managed accounts(5)(6)
Unified managed accounts(7)
Mutual fund advisory(8)
Representative as advisor(9)
Representative as portfoliomanager(10)
Subtotal
Cash management(11)
Total fee-based client assets
Representative as portfolio manager(10)
BPSBasis points
The Companys Wealth Management business segments net revenues are composed of Transactional, Asset management, Net interest and Other revenues. Transactional revenues include Investment banking, Trading, and Commissions and fees. Asset management revenues include Asset management, distribution and administration fees, and referral fees related to the bank deposit program. Net interest income includes interest related to the bank deposit program, interest on available for sale (AFS) securities and held to maturity (HTM) securities, interest on lending activities and other net interest. Other revenues include revenues from AFS securities, customer account services fees, other miscellaneous revenues and revenues from Investments.
Asset management
Transactional
Transactional.
Investment Banking. Investment banking revenues decreased 38% to $140 million and decreased 16% to $518 million in the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively, from the comparable periods of 2014, primarily due to lower revenues from the distribution of underwritten offerings.
Trading. Trading revenues decreased 75% to $47 million and decreased 35% to $475 million in the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively, from the comparable periods of 2014, primarily due to losses related to investments associated with certain employee deferred compensation plans and lower revenues from fixed income products.
Commissions and Fees. Commissions and fees revenues decreased 8% to $465 million and decreased 5% to $1,481 million in the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively, from the comparable periods of 2014, primarily due to lower revenues from equity, mutual fund and annuity products, partially offset by higher revenues from alternatives asset classes.
Asset Management.
Asset Management, Distribution and Administration Fees. Asset management, distribution and administration fees increased 2% to $2,182 million and increased 4% to $6,471 million in the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively, from the comparable periods of 2014, primarily due to higher fee-based revenues due to positive flows and market conditions, partially offset by lower revenues from referral fees from the bank deposit program, reflecting the transfer of deposits to the Company from Citi.
Balances in the bank deposit program were $139 billion at September 30, 2015 and $137 billion at December 31, 2014, which included deposits held by the Companys U.S. Bank Subsidiaries of $139 billion at September 30, 2015 and $128 billion at December 31, 2014.
Client assets in fee-based accounts decreased to $770 billion and represented 40% of total client assets at September 30, 2015 compared with $785 billion and 39% at December 31, 2014, respectively. Total client asset balances decreased to $1,925 billion at September 30, 2015 from $2,025 billion at December 31, 2014, primarily due to the impact of market conditions, partially offset by favorable asset flows. Fee-based client asset flows for the current quarter were $7.7 billion compared with $6.5 billion in the prior year quarter.
Other revenues were $52 million and $209 million in the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively, compared with $112 million and $253 million in the comparable periods of 2014, respectively, primarily due to a $40 million gain on sale of a retail property space in the prior year periods. The decrease in the current quarter also reflected lower gains on sales of AFS securities and the decrease in the nine months ended September 30, 2015 was partially offset by higher gains on sales of AFS securities.
Net Interest.
Net interest increased 25% to $751 million and increased 27% to $2,177 million in the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2015 from the comparable periods of 2014, primarily due to higher balances in the bank deposit program and growth in loans and lending commitments. Total client liability balances, which include margin lending, increased to $61 billion at September 30, 2015 from $51 billion at December 31, 2014, primarily due to higher growth from Portfolio Loan Account (PLA) and Liquidity Access Line (LAL) securities-based lending products and residential real estate loans. The loans and lending commitments in the Companys Wealth Management business segment have grown in the nine months ended September 30, 2015, and the Company expects this trend to continue. See Supplemental Financial Information and DisclosuresU.S. Bank Subsidiaries Lending Activities herein and Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market RiskCredit RiskLending Activities in Item 3.
Non-interest expenses decreased 5% and 1% in the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively, from the comparable periods of 2014. Compensation and benefits expenses decreased 7% in the current quarter from the prior year quarter, primarily due to a decrease in the fair value of deferred compensation plan referenced investments and a lower formulaic payout to Wealth Management representatives linked to lower net revenues. Compensation and benefits expenses decreased 1% in the nine months ended September 30, 2015 from the comparable period of 2014, primarily due to a decrease in the fair value of deferred compensation plan referenced investments and a decrease in amortization, partially offset by a higher formulaic payout to Wealth Management representatives linked to higher net revenues. Non-compensation expenses were essentially unchanged in the current quarter from the prior year quarter. Non-compensation expenses increased 2% in the nine months ended September 30, 2015 from the comparable period of 2014, primarily due to an increase in Professional services, resulting from consulting and legal fees, partially offset by a provision related to a rescission offer in the prior year period, see Supplemental Financial Information and DisclosuresProspectus Delivery herein.
INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT
Income from discontinued operations before income taxes
Income from discontinued operations
Statistical Data.
Activity in the Companys Investment Management business segments assets under management or supervision and the average fee rate by asset class, during the quarters and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 was as follows:
Traditional Asset Management:
Fixed income
Liquidity
Alternatives(8)(9)
Managed Futures(10)
Total Traditional Asset Management
Merchant Banking and RealEstate Investing(9)
Total assets under management or supervision
Shares of minority stake assets(11)
Merchant Banking and Real Estate Investing(9)
ManagedFutures(10)
Trading.
Trading losses were $3 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared with losses of $22 million in the comparable period of 2014, primarily reflected lower losses related to the deconsolidation of certain real estate funds sponsored by the Company in the second quarters of 2015 and 2014.
Investments.
Net investment losses were $235 million in the current quarter compared with gains of $97 million in the prior year quarter. The Company recorded a net investment gain of $149 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2015, compared with a gain of $506 million in the comparable period of 2014. The decrease in the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2015 reflected the reversal of previously accrued carried interest associated with Asia private equity, markdowns on principal investments in the Companys Merchant Banking and Real Estate Investing businesses and lower net investment gains in the Traditional Asset Management business.
Asset Management, Distribution and Administration Fees.
Asset management, distribution and administration fees decreased 3% to $511 million in the current quarter compared with the prior year quarter, primarily due to a shift in our asset class mix. Asset management, distribution and administration fees were $1,547 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2015, essentially unchanged with the comparable period of 2014. The Companys average assets under management increased $15 billion from $390 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 to $405 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, reflecting positive net flows, partially offset by the impact of market conditions and foreign currency.
Other revenues were $1 million and $15 million in the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively, compared with $38 million and $104 million in the comparable periods of 2014. The results included lower revenues associated with the Companys minority investment in certain third-party investment managers in the current year periods and a $17 million gain on sale of a retail property space in the prior year periods.
Non-interest expenses decreased 34% and 9% in the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively, compared with the comparable periods of 2014. Compensation and benefits expenses decreased 62% and 19% in the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively, primarily due to the decrease in deferred compensation associated with carried interest and a decrease in amortization attributed to the accelerated vesting of certain awards during the fourth quarter of 2014. The decrease in the nine months ended September 30, 2015 was partially offset by an increase in discretionary incentive compensation due to a reduction of average deferral rates for discretionary incentive based awards. Non-compensation expenses decreased 2% in the current quarter compared with the prior year quarter, primarily due to lower other expenses as a result of accruals for litigation and settlements in the prior year period. Non-compensation expenses increased 4% in the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared with the comparable period of 2014, primarily due to higher Professional services expenses.
Nonredeemable noncontrolling interests are primarily related to the consolidation of certain real estate funds sponsored by the Company. Investment gains (losses) associated with noncontrolling interests in these consolidated funds were $(1) million and $12 million in the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively, compared with gains of $17 million and $94 million in the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively. Nonredeemable noncontrolling interests decreased in the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2015 primarily due to the deconsolidation of certain legal entities associated with real estate funds sponsored by the Company in the second quarters of 2015 and 2014.
Supplemental Financial Information and Disclosures.
U.S. Bank Subsidiaries.
The Company provides loans to a variety of customers, from large corporate and institutional clients to high net worth individuals, primarily through the Companys U.S. Bank Subsidiaries. The Companys lending activities in its Institutional Securities business segment primarily include corporate lending activities, in which the Company provides loans or lending commitments to certain corporate clients. In addition to corporate lending activities, the Institutional Securities business segment engages in other lending activities. The Companys lending activities in its Wealth Management business segment primarily include securities-based lending that allows clients to borrow money against the value of qualifying securities and also include residential real estate loans. The Company expects its lending activities to continue to grow through further penetration of the Companys Institutional Securities and Wealth Management business segments client base. For a further discussion of the Companys credit risks, see Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market RiskCredit Risk in Item 3. Also see Notes 7 and 11 to the Companys condensed consolidated financial statements in Item 1 for additional information about the Companys loans and lending commitments, respectively.
The following table presents the Companys U.S. Bank Subsidiaries supplemental financial information included in its condensed consolidated statements of financial condition and amounts presented below exclude transactions with affiliated entities:
U.S. Bank Subsidiaries assets
U.S. Bank Subsidiaries investment securities portfolio(1)
Wealth Management U.S. Bank Subsidiaries data:
Securities-based lending and other loans
Institutional Securities U.S. Bank Subsidiaries data:
Corporate Lending
Other lending(2):
Wholesale real estate loans and other loans
Total other loans
Income Tax Matters.
The Companys effective tax rate from continuing operations was 28.7% and 24.1% for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively. The Companys effective tax rate from continuing operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 included a net discrete tax benefit of $564 million associated with the repatriation of non-U.S. earnings at a cost lower than originally estimated due to an internal restructuring to simplify the Companys legal entity organization in the U.K. Excluding this net discrete tax benefit, the effective tax rate from continuing operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 would have been 32.1%.
The Companys effective tax rate from continuing operations was 20.9% and 19.4% for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively. The Companys effective tax rate from continuing operations for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2014 included a net discrete tax benefit of $237 million primarily associated with the repatriation of non-U.S. earnings at a cost lower than originally estimated. Additionally, the Companys effective tax rate from continuing operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 included a net discrete tax benefit of $609 million principally associated with remeasurement of reserves and related interest due to new information regarding the status of a multi-year tax authority examination. Excluding these net discrete tax benefits, the effective tax rate from continuing operations for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2014 would have been 31.5% and 32.3%, respectively.
The effective tax rates excluding the net discrete tax benefits for the quarters and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 are reflective of the geographic mix of earnings.
Prospectus Delivery.
Other expenses for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2014 included $50 million (reported within Non-compensation expenses in the Companys Wealth Management business segment) related to a rescission offer to Wealth Management clients who may not have received a prospectus for certain securities transactions, for which delivery of a prospectus was required.
Accounting Development Updates.
During 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the FASB) issued the following accounting updates:
Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments. The guidance is effective for the Company prospectively beginning January 1, 2016. Early adoption is permitted.
Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs. The guidance is effective for the Company retrospectively beginning January 1, 2016. Early adoption is permitted.
Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis. The guidance is effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2016. Early adoption is permitted.
The above accounting updates issued in 2015 are not expected to have a material impact on the Companys condensed consolidated financial statements.
During 2014, the FASB issued the following accounting updates:
Determining Whether the Host Contract in a Hybrid Financial Instrument Issued in the Form of a Share Is More Akin to Debt or to Equity. The guidance is effective for the Company beginning on January 1, 2016 and must be applied on a modified retrospective basis. The guidance may be applied on a full retrospective basis to all relevant prior periods and early adoption is permitted.
Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entitys Ability to Continue as a Going Concern. The guidance is effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2017. Early adoption is permitted.
Measuring the Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities of a Consolidated Collateralized Financing Entity. The guidance is effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2016. Early adoption is permitted.
Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period. The guidance is effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2016. Early adoption is permitted.
The above accounting updates issued in 2014 are not expected to have a material impact on the Companys condensed consolidated financial statements.
During 2014, the FASB also issued the following accounting update:
Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The guidance is effective for the Company beginning on January 1, 2018, with early adoption permitted beginning on January 1, 2017.
The above accounting update issued in 2014 is currently being evaluated to determine the potential impact of adoption.
Critical Accounting Policies.
The Companys condensed consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP, which require the Company to make estimates and assumptions (see Note 1 to the Companys condensed consolidated financial statements in Item 1). The Company believes that of its significant accounting policies (see Note 2 to the Companys consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of the 2014 Form 10-K and Note 2 to the Companys condensed consolidated financial statements in Item 1), the fair value, goodwill and intangible assets, legal and regulatory contingencies and income taxes policies involve a higher degree of judgment and complexity. For a further discussion about the Companys critical accounting policies, see MD&ACritical Accounting Policies in Part II, Item 7, of the 2014 Form 10-K.
Liquidity and Capital Resources.
The Companys senior management establishes liquidity and capital policies. Through various risk and control committees, the Companys senior management reviews business performance relative to these policies, monitors the availability of alternative sources of financing, and oversees the liquidity, interest rate and currency sensitivity of the Companys asset and liability position. The Companys Treasury Department, Firm Risk Committee, Asset and Liability Management Committee, and other committees and control groups assist in evaluating, monitoring and controlling the impact that the Companys business activities have on its condensed consolidated statements of financial condition, liquidity and capital structure. Liquidity and capital matters are reported regularly to the Boards Risk Committee.
The Balance Sheet.
The Company monitors and evaluates the composition and size of its balance sheet on a regular basis. The Companys balance sheet management process includes quarterly planning, business-specific limits, monitoring of business-specific usage versus limits, key metrics and new business impact assessments.
The Company establishes balance sheet limits at the consolidated, business segment and business unit levels. The Company monitors balance sheet usage versus limits and reviews variances resulting from business activity or market fluctuations. On a regular basis, the Company reviews current performance versus limits and assesses the need to re-allocate limits based on business unit needs. The Company also monitors key metrics, including asset and liability size, composition of the balance sheet, limit utilization and capital usage.
The tables below summarize total assets for the Companys business segments at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014:
Cash and cash equivalents(1)
Trading assets
Investment securities(2)
Loans, net of allowance(3)
Other assets(4)
A substantial portion of the Companys total assets consists of liquid marketable securities and short-term receivables arising principally from sales and trading activities in the Companys Institutional Securities business segment. The liquid nature of these assets provides the Company with flexibility in managing the size of its balance sheet. The Companys total assets increased to $834 billion at September 30, 2015 from $802 billion at December 31, 2014. The increase in total assets was primarily due to increases in Securities purchased under agreements to resell, Loans, Securities borrowed, and Interest bearing deposits with banks, partially offset by decreases in Trading assets, Securities received as collateral, Investment securities, and Cash deposited with clearing organizations or segregated under federal and other regulations or requirements.
The Companys assets and liabilities include significant balances related to transactions attributable to sales and trading and securities financing activities. The following table summarizes the Companys assets and liabilities held against securities financing transactions:
Securities financing transactions(1)
Securities borrowed or securities purchased under agreements to resell and securities loaned or securities sold under agreements to repurchase are treated as collateralized financings (see Notes 2 and 6 to the Companys condensed consolidated financial statements in Item 1). The following table presents collateralized financing transactions at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 and the average balance for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014:
Securities purchased under agreements to resell and Securities borrowed
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase and Securities loaned
Securities purchased under agreements to resell and Securities borrowed period-end balances at September 30, 2015 were higher than the average balances during 2015 driven by a reduction in inventory and an increase in highly liquid collateral. Securities sold under agreements to repurchase and Securities loaned period-end balances at September 30, 2015 were lower than the average balances during 2015 driven by a reduction in secured financing requirements.
Securities financing assets and liabilities also include matched book transactions with minimal market, credit and/or liquidity risk. Matched book transactions accommodate customers, as well as obtain securities for the settlement and financing of inventory positions. The customer receivable portion of the securities financing transactions includes customer margin loans, collateralized by customer-owned securities, and customer cash, which is segregated in accordance with regulatory requirements. The customer payable portion of the securities financing transactions primarily includes customer payables to the Companys prime brokerage customers. The Companys risk exposure on these transactions is mitigated by collateral maintenance policies that limit the Companys credit exposure to customers. Included within securities financing assets were $9 billion at September 30, 2015 and $21 billion at December 31, 2014, recorded in accordance with accounting guidance for the transfer of financial assets that represented offsetting assets and liabilities for fully collateralized non-cash loan transactions.
Investment SecuritiesAvailable for Sale and Held to Maturity.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company reported unrealized gains of $72 million and $134 million, net of tax, respectively, on its AFS securities portfolio. Unrealized gains (losses) in the AFS securities portfolio are included in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for all periods presented. The net unrealized gains (losses) for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 primarily reflected changes in interest rates. During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, the net unrealized (losses) in the Companys HTM securities portfolio were $(2) million. The Company held $3,530 million in HTM securities at September 30, 2015 and expects to grow its HTM securities portfolio. The Company did not own any HTM securities at September 30, 2014.
Liquidity Risk Management Framework.
The primary goal of the Companys liquidity risk management framework is to ensure that the Company has access to adequate funding across a wide range of market conditions. The framework is designed to enable the Company to fulfill its financial obligations and support the execution of the Companys business strategies.
The following principles guide the Companys liquidity risk management framework:
Sufficient liquid assets should be maintained to cover maturing liabilities and other planned and contingent outflows;
Maturity profile of assets and liabilities should be aligned, with limited reliance on short-term funding;
Source, counterparty, currency, region, and term of funding should be diversified; and
Contingency Funding Plan (CFP) should anticipate, and account for, periods of limited access to funding.
The core components of the Companys liquidity risk management framework are the CFP, Liquidity Stress Tests and the Global Liquidity Reserve, which support the Companys target liquidity profile. For a further discussion about the Companys CFP and Liquidity Stress Tests, see MD&ALiquidity and Capital ResourcesLiquidity Risk Management Framework in Part II, Item 7 of the 2014 Form 10-K.
Liquidity Stress Tests.
At September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Company maintained sufficient liquidity to meet current and contingent funding obligations as modeled in its Liquidity Stress Tests.
Global Liquidity Reserve.
The Company maintains sufficient liquidity reserves (Global Liquidity Reserve) to cover daily funding needs and to meet strategic liquidity targets sized by the CFP and Liquidity Stress Tests. For further discussion of the Companys Global Liquidity Reserve, see MD&ALiquidity and Capital ResourcesLiquidity Risk Management FrameworkGlobal Liquidity Reserve in Part II, Item 7 of the 2014 Form 10-K.
Global Liquidity Reserve by Type of Investment. The table below summarizes the Companys Global Liquidity Reserve by type of investment:
Cash deposits with banks
Cash deposits with central banks
Unencumbered highly liquid securities:
U.S. government obligations
U.S. agency and agency mortgage-backed securities
Non-U.S. sovereign obligations(1)
Investments in money market funds
Other investment grade securities
Global Liquidity Reserve
Global Liquidity Reserve Managed by Bank and Non-Bank Legal Entities. The table below summarizes period-end and average balances of the Companys Global Liquidity Reserve managed by bank and non-bank legal entities:
Bank legal entities:
Domestic
Foreign
Total Bank legal entities
Non-Bank legal entities(2):
Total Non-Bank legal entities
Regulatory Framework for Liquidity Risk Measurement.
The U.S. banking agencies and the Basel Committee have adopted, or are in the process of considering liquidity standards. The Basel Committee has developed two standards intended for use in liquidity risk supervision: the Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) and the Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR).
For a discussion of the Companys LCR and NSFR, see MD&ALiquidity and Capital ResourcesLiquidity Risk Management FrameworkBasel Liquidity FrameworkLiquidity Coverage Ratio and Net Stable Funding Ratio in Part II, Item 7 of the 2014 Form 10-K.
Funding Management.
The Company manages its funding in a manner that reduces the risk of disruption to the Companys operations. The Company pursues a strategy of diversification of secured and unsecured funding sources (by product, by investor and by region) and attempts to ensure that the tenor of the Companys liabilities equals or exceeds the expected holding period of the assets being financed.
The Company funds its balance sheet on a global basis through diverse sources. These sources may include the Companys equity capital, long-term debt, repurchase agreements, securities lending, deposits, commercial paper, letters of credit and lines of credit. The Company has active financing programs for both standard and structured products targeting global investors and currencies.
Secured Financing.
For a discussion of the Companys secured financing activities, see MD&ALiquidity and Capital ResourcesFunding ManagementSecured Financing in Part II, Item 7 of the 2014 Form 10-K.
At September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the weighted average maturity of the Companys secured financing against less liquid assets was greater than 120 days.
Unsecured Financing.
For a discussion of the Companys unsecured financing activities, see MD&ALiquidity and Capital ResourcesFunding ManagementUnsecured Financing in Part II, Item 7 of the 2014 Form 10-K. When appropriate, the Company may use derivative products to conduct asset and liability management and to make adjustments to the Companys interest rate and structured borrowings risk profile (see Note 4 to the Companys condensed consolidated financial statements in Item 1).
Deposits.
Available funding sources to the Companys bank subsidiaries include time deposits, money market deposit accounts, demand deposit accounts, repurchase agreements, federal funds purchased, commercial paper and Federal Home Loan Bank advances. The vast majority of deposits in the Companys U.S. Bank Subsidiaries are sourced from the Companys retail brokerage accounts and are considered to have stable, low-cost funding characteristics. The transfer of deposits previously held by Citi to the Companys depository institutions relating to the Companys customer accounts from its acquisition of the Wealth Management JV (see Note 3 to the Companys consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of the 2014 Form 10-K) was completed at June 30, 2015. During 2015, $8.7 billion of deposits were transferred by Citi to the Companys depository institutions.
Deposits were as follows:
Short-Term Borrowings.
The Companys unsecured Short-term borrowings may consist of bank loans, bank notes, commercial paper and structured notes with maturities of twelve months or less at issuance. At September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Company had approximately $1,982 million and $2,261 million, respectively, in Short-term borrowings.
The Company believes that accessing debt investors through multiple distribution channels helps provide consistent access to the unsecured markets. In addition, the issuance of long-term debt allows the Company to reduce reliance on short-term credit sensitive instruments (e.g., commercial paper and other unsecured short-term borrowings). Long-term borrowings are generally managed to achieve staggered maturities, thereby mitigating refinancing risk, and to maximize investor diversification through sales to global institutional and retail clients across regions, currencies and product types. Availability and cost of financing to the Company can vary depending on market conditions, the volume of certain trading and lending activities, the Companys credit ratings and the overall availability of credit.
The Company may engage in various transactions in the credit markets (including, for example, debt retirements) that it believes are in the best interests of the Company and its investors.
Long-term borrowings by maturity profile at September 30, 2015 consisted of the following:
Due in 2015
Due in 2016
Due in 2017
Due in 2018
Due in 2019
Thereafter
During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Company issued notes with a principal amount of approximately $30.2 billion. In connection with these note issuances, the Company generally enters into certain transactions to obtain floating interest rates. The weighted average maturity of the Companys long-term borrowings, based upon stated maturity dates, was approximately 5.9 years at September 30, 2015. During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, approximately $17.6 billion in aggregate long-term borrowings matured or were retired. Subsequent to September 30, 2015 and through October 30, 2015, the Companys long-term borrowings decreased by approximately $2.3 billion, net of issuances. For a further discussion of the Companys long-term borrowings, including the amount of senior debt outstanding at September 30, 2015, see Note 10 to the Companys condensed consolidated financial statements in Item 1.
Capital Covenants.
In April 2007, the Company executed replacement capital covenants in connection with an offering by Morgan Stanley Capital Trust VIII Capital Securities, which become effective after the scheduled redemption date in 2046. Under the terms of the replacement capital covenants, the Company has agreed, for the benefit of certain specified holders of debt, to limitations on its ability to redeem or repurchase any of the Capital Securities for specified periods of time. For a complete description of the Capital Securities and the terms of the replacement capital covenants, see the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 26, 2007.
Credit Ratings.
The Company relies on external sources to finance a significant portion of its day-to-day operations. The cost and availability of financing generally are impacted by, among other things, the Companys credit ratings. In addition, the Companys credit ratings can have an impact on certain trading revenues, particularly in those businesses where longer-term counterparty performance is a key consideration, such as OTC derivative transactions, including credit derivatives and interest rate swaps. Rating agencies consider company-specific factors; other industry factors such as regulatory or legislative changes; the macroeconomic environment; and perceived levels of government support, among other things.
Some rating agencies have stated that they currently incorporate various degrees of credit rating uplift from external sources of potential support, as well as perceived government support of systemically important banks, including the credit ratings of the Company. Rating agencies continue to monitor the progress of U.S. financial reform legislation and regulations to assess whether the possibility of extraordinary government support for the financial system in any future financial crises is negatively impacted. Legislative and rulemaking outcomes may lead to reduced uplift assumptions for U.S. banks and, thereby, place downward pressure on credit ratings. At the same time, proposed and final U.S. financial reform legislation and attendant rulemaking, such as higher standards for capital and liquidity levels, also have positive implications for credit ratings. The net result on credit ratings and the timing of any change in rating agency views on changes in potential government support and financial reform efforts are currently uncertain.
At November 2, 2015, the Parents and MSBNAs senior unsecured ratings were as set forth below:
DBRS, Inc.
Fitch Ratings, Inc.(1)
Moodys Investors Service(2)
Rating and Investment Information, Inc.
Standard & Poors Ratings Services(3)
In connection with certain OTC trading agreements and certain other agreements where the Company is a liquidity provider to certain financing vehicles associated with the Companys Institutional Securities business segment, the Company may be required to provide additional collateral or immediately settle any outstanding liability balances with certain counterparties or pledge additional collateral to certain exchanges and clearing organizations in the event of a future credit rating downgrade irrespective of whether the Company is in a net asset or net liability position.
The additional collateral or termination payments that may be called in the event of a future credit rating downgrade vary by contract and can be based on ratings by either or both of Moodys and S&P. At September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the future potential collateral amounts and termination payments that could be called or required by counterparties or exchanges and clearing organizations in the event of one-notch or two-notch downgrade scenarios, from the lowest of Moodys or S&P ratings, based on the relevant contractual downgrade triggers were as follows:
Incremental collateral or terminating payments upon potential future ratings downgrade:
While certain aspects of a credit rating downgrade are quantifiable pursuant to contractual provisions, the impact it will have on the Companys business and results of operation in future periods is inherently uncertain and will depend on a number of interrelated factors, including, among others, the magnitude of the downgrade, the rating relative to peers, the rating assigned by the relevant agency pre-downgrade, individual client behavior and future mitigating actions the Company may take. The liquidity impact of additional collateral requirements is included in the Companys Liquidity Stress Tests.
Capital Management.
The Companys senior management views capital as an important source of financial strength. The Company actively manages its consolidated capital position based upon, among other things, business opportunities, risks, capital availability and rates of return together with internal capital policies, regulatory requirements and rating agency guidelines and, therefore, in the future may expand or contract its capital base to address the changing needs of its businesses. The Company attempts to maintain total capital, on a consolidated basis, at least equal to the sum of its operating subsidiaries required equity.
In March 2015, the Company received no objection from the Federal Reserve to its 2015 capital plan. The capital plan included a share repurchase of up to $3.1 billion of the Companys outstanding common stock that began in the second quarter of 2015 through the end of the second quarter of 2016. Additionally, the capital plan included an increase in the Companys quarterly common stock dividend to $0.15 per share from $0.10 per share, that began with the dividend declared on April 20, 2015. During the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2015 the Company repurchased approximately $625 million and $1,500 million, respectively, of the Companys outstanding common stock as part of its share repurchase program. During the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2014, the Company repurchased approximately $195 million and $629 million, respectively, of the Companys outstanding common stock as part of its share repurchase program (see Note 14 to the Companys condensed consolidated financial statements in Item 1).
Pursuant to the share repurchase program, the Company considers, among other things, business segment capital needs as well as equity-based compensation and benefit plan requirements. Share repurchases under the Companys program will be exercised from time to time at prices the Company deems appropriate subject to various factors, including the Companys capital position and market conditions. The share repurchases may be effected through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions, including through Rule 10b5-1 plans, and may be suspended at any time. Share repurchases by the Company are subject to regulatory approval (see also Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Uses of Proceeds in Part II, Item 2).
The Companys Board of Directors determines the declaration and payment of dividends on a quarterly basis. On October 19, 2015, the Company announced that its Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend per common share of $0.15. The dividend is payable on November 13, 2015 to common shareholders of record on October 30, 2015 (see Note 20 to the Companys condensed consolidated financial statements in Item 1).
Issuance of Preferred Stock.
Series J Preferred Stock. On March 19, 2015, the Company issued 1,500,000 Depositary Shares for an aggregate price of $1,500 million. Each Depositary Share represents a 1/25th interest in a share of perpetual Fixed-to-Floating Rate Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series J, $0.01 par value (Series J Preferred Stock). The Series J Preferred Stock is redeemable at the Companys option (i) in whole or in part, from time to time, on any dividend payment date on or after July 15, 2020 or (ii) in whole but not in part at any time within 90 days following a regulatory capital treatment event (as described in the terms of that series), in each case at a redemption price of $25,000 per share (equivalent to $1,000 per Depositary Share), plus any declared and unpaid dividends to, but excluding, the date fixed for redemption, without accumulation of any undeclared dividends. The Series J Preferred Stock also has a preference over the Companys common stock upon liquidation. The Series J Preferred Stock offering (net of related issuance costs) resulted in proceeds of approximately $1,493 million.
On September 15, 2015, the Company announced that its Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend for preferred stock shareholders of record on September 30, 2015, that was paid on October 15, 2015 as follows:
Preferred Stock Description
QuarterlyDividend
Per Share(1)
Tangible Equity.
The following table sets forth tangible Morgan Stanley shareholders equity and tangible common equity at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 and average tangible Morgan Stanley shareholders equity and average tangible common equity for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014:
Common equity
Preferred equity
Morgan Stanley shareholders equity
Junior subordinated debentures issued to capital trusts
Less: Goodwill and net intangible assets(2)
Tangible Morgan Stanley shareholders equity(3)
Tangible common equity(3)
Regulatory Requirements.
The Company is a financial holding company under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (the BHC Act), and is subject to the regulation and oversight of the Federal Reserve. The Federal Reserve establishes capital requirements for the Company, including well-capitalized standards, and evaluates the Companys compliance with such capital requirements. The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) establishes similar capital requirements and standards for the Companys U.S. Bank Subsidiaries.
Implementation of U.S. Basel III.
The U.S. banking regulators have comprehensively revised their risk-based and leverage capital framework to implement many aspects of the Basel III capital standards established by the Basel Committee. The U.S. banking regulators revised capital framework is referred to herein as U.S. Basel III. The Company and its U.S. Bank Subsidiaries became subject to U.S. Basel III on January 1, 2014. Aspects of U.S. Basel III, such as the minimum risk-based capital ratio requirements, new capital buffers, and certain deductions from and adjustments to capital, will be phased in over several years.
Regulatory Capital. Under U.S. Basel III, new items (including certain investments in the capital instruments of unconsolidated financial institutions) are deducted from the respective tiers of regulatory capital, and certain existing regulatory deductions and adjustments are modified or are no longer applicable. The majority of these capital deductions are subject to a phase-in schedule and will be fully phased in by 2018. Unrealized gains and losses on AFS securities are reflected in Common Equity Tier 1 capital, subject to a phase-in schedule. The percentage of the regulatory deductions and adjustments to Common Equity Tier 1 capital that applied to the Company at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 ranged from 20% to 100%, depending on the specific item.
In addition, U.S. Basel III narrows the eligibility criteria for regulatory capital instruments. Existing trust preferred securities will be fully phased-out of the Companys Tier 1 capital by January 1, 2016. Thereafter, existing trust preferred securities that do not satisfy U.S. Basel IIIs eligibility criteria for Tier 2 capital will be phased out of the Companys regulatory capital by January 1, 2022.
In addition, beginning with the third quarter of 2015, the required deductions under the new restrictions on activities and investments imposed by a section of the BHC Act added by the Dodd-Frank Act, referred to as the Volcker Rule, are reflected in the relevant regulatory capital tiers and ratios (see Activities Restrictions under the Volcker Rule herein).
Risk-Weighted Assets. The Company is required to calculate and hold capital against credit, market and operational risk RWAs. RWAs reflect both on- and off-balance sheet risk of the Company. Credit risk RWAs reflect capital charges attributable to the risk of loss arising from a borrower or counterparty failing to meet its financial obligations. Market risk RWAs reflect capital charges attributable to the risk of loss resulting from adverse changes in market prices and other factors. For a further discussion of the Companys market and credit risks, see Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk in Item 3. Operational risk RWAs reflect capital charges attributable to the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed processes, people and systems or from external events (e.g., fraud, theft, legal and compliance risks or damage to physical assets). The Company may incur operational risks across the full scope of its business activities, including revenue-generating activities (e.g., sales and trading) and control groups (e.g., information technology and trade processing). In addition, given the evolving regulatory and litigation environment across the financial services industry and that operational risk RWAs incorporate the impact of such related matters, operational risk RWAs may increase in future periods.
The Basel Committee is in the process of considering revisions to various provisions of the Basel III framework that, if adopted by the U.S. banking agencies, could result in substantial changes to U.S. Basel III. In particular, the Basel Committee has finalized a new methodology for calculating counterparty credit risk exposures, the
standardized approach for measuring counterparty credit risk exposures; has also finalized a revised framework establishing capital requirements for securitizations; and has proposed revisions to various regulatory capital standards, including for trading and banking book exposures, interest rate risk in the banking book, the credit valuation adjustment, the credit risk framework, operational risk and capital floors. In each case, the impact of these revised standards on the Company and its U.S. Bank Subsidiaries is uncertain and depends on future rulemakings by the U.S. banking agencies.
Calculation of Risk-Based Capital Ratios. As a U.S. Basel III Advanced Approach banking organization, the Company is subject to a permanent capital floor based on the lower of the risk-based capital ratios calculated using (i) standardized approaches for calculating credit risk RWAs and market risk RWAs (the Standardized Approach); and (ii) an advanced internal ratings-based approach for calculating credit risk RWAs, an advanced measurement approach for calculating operational risk RWAs, and an advanced approach for calculating market risk RWAs (the Advanced Approach) under U.S. Basel III. The capital floor applies to the calculation of the minimum risk-based capital requirements and, when in effect, the capital conservation buffer, the countercyclical capital buffer (if deployed by banking regulators), and the global systemically important bank (G-SIB) capital surcharge.
For information on the basis for the calculation of the Companys U.S. Basel III capital ratios, on a transitional and fully phased-in basis, see MD&ALiquidity and Capital ResourcesRegulatory RequirementsImplementation of U.S. Basel IIICalculation of Risk-Based Capital Ratios in Part II, Item 7 of the 2014 Form 10-K.
Regulatory Capital Ratios. The Company is required to calculate capital ratios under both the Advanced Approach and the Standardized Approach, in both cases subject to transitional provisions. The following table presents the Companys regulatory capital ratios at September 30, 2015, as well as the minimum required regulatory capital ratios applicable under U.S. Basel III in 2015.
Tier 1 leverage ratio(3)
Beginning on January 1, 2015, for the Company to remain a financial holding company, its U.S. Bank Subsidiaries must qualify as well-capitalized under the higher capital requirements of U.S. Basel III by maintaining a total risk-based capital ratio (total capital to risk-weighted assets) of at least 10%, a Tier 1 risk-
based capital ratio of at least 8%, a Common Equity Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of at least 6.5%, and a Tier 1 leverage ratio of at least 5%. The Federal Reserve has not yet revised the well-capitalized standard for financial holding companies to reflect the higher capital standards in U.S. Basel III. Assuming that the Federal Reserve would apply the same or very similar well-capitalized standards to financial holding companies, each of the Companys risk-based capital ratios and Tier 1 leverage ratio at September 30, 2015 would have exceeded the revised well-capitalized standard. The Federal Reserve may require the Company and its peer financial holding companies to maintain risk- and leverage-based capital ratios substantially in excess of mandated minimum levels, depending upon general economic conditions and a financial holding companys particular condition, risk profile and growth plans.
At September 30, 2015, the Companys capital ratios calculated under the U.S. Basel III Advanced Approach were lower than those calculated under the U.S. Basel III Standardized Approach and therefore are the binding ratios for the Company as a result of the capital floor. At December 31, 2014, the Companys capital ratios calculated under the U.S. Basel III Advanced Approach were lower than those calculated under the Standardized Approach, represented as the U.S. banking regulators U.S. Basel I-based rules (U.S. Basel I) as supplemented by rules that implemented the Basel Committees market risk capital framework amendment, commonly referred to as Basel 2.5. The table below presents the Companys RWAs and regulatory capital ratios under the U.S. Basel III Advanced Approach transitional rules at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014.
RWAs:
Credit risk
Market risk
Operational risk
Total RWAs
Capital ratios:
Common Equity Tier 1 ratio
Tier 1 leverage ratio
Adjusted average assets(1)
The following table represents a roll-forward of the Companys Common Equity Tier 1 capital, Additional Tier 1 capital and Tier 2 capital calculated under the U.S. Basel III Advanced Approach transitional rules from December 31, 2014 to September 30, 2015 (dollars in millions).
Common Equity Tier 1 capital:
Common Equity Tier 1 capital at December 31, 2014
Change related to the following items:
Value of shareholders common equity
Net goodwill
Net intangible assets (other than goodwill and mortgage servicing assets)
Credit spread premium over risk-free rate for derivative liabilities
Net deferred tax assets
Debt valuation adjustment
Adjustments related to accumulated other comprehensive income
Expected credit loss that exceeds eligible credit reserves
Other deductions and adjustments
Common Equity Tier 1 capital at September 30, 2015
Additional Tier 1 capital:
Additional Tier 1 capital at December 31, 2014
New issuance of qualifying preferred stock
Trust preferred securities
Other adjustments and deductions
Additional Tier 1 capital at September 30, 2015
Tier 1 capital (Common Equity Tier 1 capital plus Additional Tier 1 capital) at September 30, 2015
Tier 2 capital:
Tier 2 capital at December 31, 2014
Tier 2 capital at September 30, 2015
Total capital at September 30, 2015
The following table summarizes the Companys Common Equity Tier 1 capital, Additional Tier 1 capital and Tier 2 capital calculated under the U.S. Basel III Advanced Approach transitional rules at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014:
Common stock and surplus
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss)
Regulatory adjustments and deductions:
Expected credit loss over eligible credit reserves
Total Common Equity Tier 1 capital
Preferred stock
Additional Tier 1 capital
Total Tier 1 capital
Other qualifying amounts
Regulatory adjustments and deductions
Total Tier 2 capital
The following table represents a roll-forward of the Companys RWAs calculated under the U.S. Basel III Advanced Approach transitional rules from December 31, 2014 to September 30, 2015. The RWAs for each category in the table reflect both on- and off-balance sheet exposures, where appropriate (dollars in millions).
Credit risk RWAs:
Securities financing transactions
Other counterparty credit risk
Securitizations
Credit valuation adjustment
Cash
Equity investments
Other credit risk(1)
Total change in credit risk RWAs
Market risk RWAs:
Regulatory VaR
Regulatory stressed VaR
Incremental risk charge
Comprehensive risk measure
Specific risk:
Non-securitizations
Total change in market risk RWAs
Operational risk RWAs:
Changes during the period(2)
VaRValue-at-Risk.
Pro Forma Regulatory Capital Ratios. The following table presents the Companys pro forma estimates under the fully phased-in U.S. Basel III Advanced and Standardized Approaches at September 30, 2015:
These fully phased-in basis pro forma estimates are based on the Companys current understanding of U.S. Basel III and other factors, which may be subject to change as the Company receives additional clarification and implementation guidance from the Federal Reserve relating to U.S. Basel III and as the interpretation of the regulation evolves over time. The fully phased-in basis pro forma Common Equity Tier 1 capital, RWAs and Common Equity Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio estimates are non-GAAP financial measures that the Company considers to be useful measures for evaluating compliance with new regulatory capital requirements that were not yet effective at September 30, 2015. These preliminary estimates are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially and should not be taken as a projection of what the Companys capital ratios, RWAs, earnings or other results will actually be at future dates. See Risk Factors in Part I, Item 1A of the 2014 Form 10-K for a discussion of risks and uncertainties that may affect the future results of the Company.
As of January 1, 2015, the Company is subject to the following minimum capital ratios under U.S. Basel III: Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 4.5%; Tier 1 capital ratio of 6.0%; Total capital ratio of 8.0%; and Tier 1 leverage ratio of 4.0%. As of January 1, 2018, the Company will be subject to a supplementary leverage ratio requirement of at least 5.0%, which includes a Tier 1 supplementary leverage capital buffer of at least 2.0% in addition to the 3.0% minimum supplementary leverage ratio (see Supplementary Leverage Ratio herein). In addition, on a fully phased-in basis by 2019, the Company will be subject to a greater than 2.5% Common Equity Tier 1 capital conservation buffer and, if deployed by banking regulators, up to a 2.5% Common Equity Tier 1 countercyclical buffer. The capital conservation buffer and countercyclical capital buffer, if any, apply over each of the Companys Common Equity Tier 1, Tier 1 and Total risk-based capital ratios. Failure to maintain such buffers will result in restrictions on the Companys ability to make capital distributions, including the payment of dividends and the repurchase of stock, and to pay discretionary bonuses to executive officers. In July 2015, the Federal Reserve issued a final rule imposing risk-based capital surcharges, which augment the capital conservation buffer, on U.S. bank holding companies that are identified as G-SIBs (see G-SIB Capital Surcharge herein).
G-SIB Capital Surcharge.
In July 2015, the Federal Reserve issued a final rule imposing risk-based capital surcharges on U.S. bank holding companies that are identified as G-SIBs, which include the Company. Under the final rule, a G-SIB must calculate its G-SIB capital surcharge under two methods and use the higher of the two surcharges. The first method considers the G-SIBs size, interconnectedness, cross-jurisdictional activity, substitutability and complexity, which is generally consistent with the methodology developed by the Basel Committee. The second method uses similar inputs, but replaces substitutability with the use of short-term wholesale funding and generally results in higher surcharges than the first method. Under the final rule, the G-SIB capital surcharge must be satisfied using Common Equity Tier 1 capital and will function as an extension of the capital conservation buffer. The Federal Reserve has stated that, under the final rule and using the most recent available data, the estimated G-SIB surcharges will range from 1.0% to 4.5% of a GSIBs RWAs. Under the Federal Reserves calculation for the Company, the Companys G-SIB surcharge would be 3%. The surcharge will be phased in between January 1, 2016 and January 1, 2019.
Total Loss-Absorbing Capacity.
On October 30, 2015, the Federal Reserve issued a proposal for top-tier bank holding companies of U.S. G-SIBs (covered BHCs), including the Company, which establishes external total loss-absorbing capacity (TLAC) requirements. The proposal contains various definitions and restrictions, such as requiring eligible long-term debt to be unsecured, to have a maturity greater than one year, and not include certain debt with derivative-linked features, such as certain structured notes. Under the proposal, a covered BHC would be required to maintain a minimum external TLAC of the greater of 16% of RWAs, excluding regulatory buffers, and 9.5% of the denominator of its U.S. Basel III total leverage exposure by January 1, 2019, increasing to the greater of 18% of RWAs, excluding regulatory buffers, and 9.5% of the denominator of its U.S. Basel III total leverage exposure
by January 1, 2022. In addition, covered BHCs must meet the external TLAC requirement with minimum eligible long-term debt equal to the greater of 6% of RWAs plus the G-SIB capital surcharge, and 4.5% of the denominator of its U.S. Basel III total leverage exposure. The proposal would also impose restrictions on other liabilities that covered BHCs incur or have outstanding, as well as require all U.S. banking organizations supervised by the Federal Reserve with assets of at least $1 billion to make certain deductions from capital for their investments in unsecured debt issued by covered BHCs. The Company is currently reviewing the proposal and evaluating the potential impact of these proposed requirements.
Capital Plans and Stress Tests.
Pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act, the Federal Reserve has adopted capital planning and stress test requirements for large bank holding companies, including the Company, which form part of the Federal Reserves annual Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR) framework. Under the Federal Reserves capital plan rule, the Company must submit an annual capital plan to the Federal Reserve, taking into account the results of separate stress tests designed by the Company and the Federal Reserve, so that the Federal Reserve may assess the Companys systems and processes that incorporate forward-looking projections of revenues and losses to monitor and maintain its internal capital adequacy. The capital plan rule requires that such companies receive no objection from the Federal Reserve before making a capital distribution. In addition, even with an approved capital plan, a large bank holding company must seek the approval of the Federal Reserve before making a capital distribution if, among other reasons, it would not meet its regulatory capital requirements after making the proposed capital distribution. In addition, the Federal Reserves final rule on stress testing under the Dodd-Frank Act requires the Company to conduct semi-annual company-run stress tests. The rule also subjects the Company to an annual supervisory stress test conducted by the Federal Reserve.
The Company submitted its 2015 annual capital plan to the Federal Reserve in January 2015 and received no objection to the plan (see Capital Management herein). In March 2015, the Federal Reserve published summary results of the Dodd-Frank Act and CCAR supervisory stress tests of each large bank holding company, including the Company. As required, the Company disclosed a summary of the results of its company-run stress tests on March 11, 2015. In July 2015, the Company submitted its 2015 semi-annual stress test to the Federal Reserve.
The final rule also requires Advanced Approach banking organizations that have exited from the parallel run, including the Company, to incorporate the Advanced Approach into their capital planning and company-run stress tests beginning with the January 1, 2016 cycle. However, in July 2015, the Federal Reserve issued proposed revisions to its capital plan and stress test rules that would, among other things, indefinitely defer the use of the Advanced Approach, remove the Tier 1 common ratio requirement, and delay the incorporation of the supplementary leverage ratio until the 2017 cycle. In addition, the Federal Reserve has indicated that it is considering whether and, if so, how to incorporate the G-SIB capital surcharge in the CCAR and Dodd-Frank Act stress tests. In October 2014, the Federal Reserve revised its capital planning and stress testing regulations to, among other things, generally limit a large bank holding companys ability to make capital distributions (other than scheduled payments on Additional Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital instruments) if the bank holding companys net capital issuances are less than the amount indicated in its capital plan, and to shift the start and submission dates of the capital plan and stress test cycles beginning with the 2016 cycle.
The Dodd-Frank Act also requires each of the Companys U.S. Bank Subsidiaries to conduct an annual stress test. MSBNA submitted its 2015 annual company-run stress tests to the OCC in January 2015 and MSPBNA submitted its annual company-run stress tests to the OCC in March 2015. MSBNA published a summary of its stress test results on March 11, 2015, and MSPBNA published a summary of its stress test results on June 15, 2015. In June 2014, the OCC issued a proposed rule, among other things, to shift the timing of the annual stress testing cycle that applies to the Companys U.S. Bank Subsidiaries beginning with the 2016 cycle.
Supplementary Leverage Ratio.
Beginning on January 1, 2015, the Company and its U.S. Bank Subsidiaries are required to publicly disclose their U.S. Basel III supplementary leverage ratio, which will become effective as a capital standard on January 1, 2018. By January 1, 2018, the Company must also maintain a Tier 1 supplementary leverage capital buffer of at least 2% in addition to the 3% minimum supplementary leverage ratio (for a total of at least 5%), in order to avoid limitations on capital distributions, including dividends and stock repurchases, and discretionary bonus payments to executive officers. In addition, beginning in 2018, the Companys U.S. Bank Subsidiaries must maintain a supplementary leverage ratio of 6% to be considered well-capitalized.
The following table presents the Companys total consolidated assets and consolidated daily average assets under U.S. GAAP, its total supplementary leverage exposure and its supplementary leverage ratio disclosures on a transitional basis under the U.S. Basel III rules:
Consolidated daily average assets(1)
Adjustment for derivative exposures(2)
Adjustment for repo-style transactions(2)
Adjustment for off-balance sheet exposures(2)
Other adjustments(3)
Supplementary leverage exposure
Supplementary leverage ratio(4)
The supplementary leverage exposure (noted in the above table) represents the Companys consolidated daily average assets under U.S. GAAP as adjusted, among other items, by: (i) the addition of the potential future
exposure for derivative contracts (including derivatives that are centrally cleared for clients), the gross-up of cash collateral netting where certain qualifying criteria are not met, and the effective notional principal amount of sold credit protection offset by certain qualifying purchased credit protection; (ii) the counterparty credit risk associated with repo-style transactions; (iii) the credit equivalent amount of off-balance sheet exposures, which is computed by applying the relevant credit conversion factors; and (iv) certain amounts deducted or adjusted from Tier 1 capital under U.S. Basel III. The supplementary leverage exposure and supplementary leverage ratio are non-GAAP financial measures that the Company considers to be useful measures for evaluating compliance with new regulatory capital requirements that have not yet become effective.
The Company estimates its pro forma fully phased-in supplementary leverage ratio to be approximately 5.5% at September 30, 2015. This estimate utilizes a fully phased-in U.S. Basel III Tier 1 capital numerator and a denominator of approximately $1.12 trillion. The Companys estimates are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from estimates based on these regulations. Further, these expectations should not be taken as projections of what the Companys supplementary leverage ratios, earnings, assets or exposures will actually be at future dates. See Risk Factors in Part I, Item 1A of the 2014 Form 10-K for a discussion of risks and uncertainties that may affect the future results of the Company.
Required Capital.
The Companys required capital (Required Capital) estimation is based on the Required Capital framework, an internal capital adequacy measure. This framework is a risk-based and leverage use-of-capital measure, which is compared with the Companys regulatory capital to ensure that the Company maintains an amount of going concern capital after absorbing potential losses from extreme stress events, where applicable, at a point in time. The Company defines the difference between its regulatory capital and aggregate Required Capital as Parent capital. Average Common Equity Tier 1 capital, aggregate Required Capital and Parent capital for the quarter ended September 30, 2015 were approximately $58.8 billion, $38.4 billion and $20.4 billion, respectively. The Company generally holds Parent capital for prospective regulatory requirements, including for example, supplementary leverage ratio and U.S. Basel III transitional deductions and adjustments expected to reduce the Companys capital through 2018. The Company also holds Parent capital for organic growth, acquisitions and other capital needs.
Common Equity Tier 1 capital and common equity attribution to the business segments is based on capital usage calculated by the Required Capital framework as well as each business segments relative contribution to the Companys total Required Capital. Required Capital is assessed at each business segment and further attributed to product lines. This process is intended to align capital with the risks in each business segment in order to allow senior management to evaluate returns on a risk-adjusted basis. The Required Capital framework will evolve over time in response to changes in the business and regulatory environment and to incorporate enhancements in modeling techniques. The Company will continue to evaluate the framework with respect to the impact of future regulatory requirements, as appropriate.
The following table presents the Companys business segments and the Parents average Common Equity Tier 1 capital and average common equity, which were calculated on a monthly basis:
Activities Restrictions under the Volcker Rule.
In December 2013, U.S. regulators issued final regulations to implement the Volcker Rule. The Volcker Rule prohibits banking entities, including the Company and its affiliates, from engaging in certain prohibited proprietary trading activities, as defined in the Volcker Rule, subject to exemptions for underwriting, market making-related activities, risk-mitigating hedging and certain other activities. The Volcker Rule also prohibits certain investments and relationships by banking entities with covered funds, as defined in the Volcker Rule, subject to certain exemptions and exclusions. Banking entities were required to bring all of their activities and investments into conformance with the Volcker Rule by July 21, 2015, subject to certain extensions. In addition, the Volcker Rule requires banking entities to have comprehensive compliance programs reasonably designed to ensure and monitor compliance with the Volcker Rule.
The Volcker Rule also requires that deductions be made from a bank holding companys Tier 1 capital for certain permissible investments in covered funds. Beginning with the third quarter of 2015, the required deductions are reflected in the relevant regulatory capital tiers and ratios.
Resolution and Recovery Planning.
Pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act, the Company is required to submit to the Federal Reserve and the FDIC an annual resolution plan that describes its strategy for a rapid and orderly resolution under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code in the event of material financial distress or failure of the Company. The Company submitted its 2015 resolution plan in July 2015. In addition, MSBNA is required to submit to the FDIC an annual resolution plan that describes MSBNAs strategy for a rapid and orderly resolution in the event of a material financial distress or failure of MSBNA. MSBNA submitted its 2015 resolution plan in September 2015. For further information on the Companys resolution and recovery planning, see BusinessSupervision and RegulationResolution and Recovery Planning in Part I, Item 1 of the 2014 Form 10-K.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements with Unconsolidated Entities.
The Company enters into various arrangements with unconsolidated entities, including variable interest entities, primarily in connection with its Institutional Securities and Investment Management business segments. See Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements with Unconsolidated Entities included in Part II, Item 7 of the 2014 Form 10-K and Note 12 to the condensed consolidated financial statements in Item 1 for further information.
See Note 11 to the condensed consolidated financial statements in Item 1 for information on guarantees.
The Companys commitments associated with outstanding letters of credit and other financial guarantees obtained to satisfy collateral requirements, investment activities, corporate lending, securities financing arrangements, mortgage lending, underwriting commitments and other financing arrangements at September 30, 2015 were approximately $188 billion. See Note 11 to the condensed consolidated financial statements in Item 1 for further information on commitments.
Effects of Inflation and Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates.
To the extent that an increased inflation outlook results in rising interest rates or has negative impacts on the valuation of financial instruments that exceed the impact on the value of the Companys liabilities, it may adversely affect the Companys financial position and profitability. A significant portion of the Companys business is conducted in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, and changes in foreign exchange rates relative to the U.S. dollar, therefore, can affect the value of non-U.S. dollar net assets, revenues and expenses. For a further discussion of the effects of inflation and changes in foreign exchange rates on the Companys business and financial results and strategies to mitigate potential exposures see MD&ALiquidity and Capital ResourcesEffects of Inflation and Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates in Part II, Item 7 of the 2014 Form 10-K.
Market Risk.
Market risk refers to the risk that a change in the level of one or more market prices, rates, indices, implied volatilities (the price volatility of the underlying instrument imputed from option prices), correlations or other market factors, such as market liquidity, will result in losses for a position or portfolio. Generally, the Company incurs market risk as a result of trading, investing and client facilitation activities, principally within the Companys Institutional Securities business segment where the substantial majority of the Companys Value-at-Risk (VaR) for market risk exposures is generated. In addition, the Company incurs trading-related market risk within its Wealth Management business segment. The Companys Investment Management business segment incurs principally Non-trading market risk primarily from capital investments in real estate funds and investments in private equity vehicles. For a further discussion of the Companys Market Risk, see Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market RiskRisk Management in Part II, Item 7A of the 2014 Form 10-K.
VaR.
The Company uses the statistical technique known as VaR as one of the tools used to measure, monitor and review the market risk exposures of its trading portfolios. The Companys Market Risk Department calculates and distributes daily VaR-based risk measures to various levels of management.
VaR Methodology, Assumptions and Limitations. For information regarding the Companys VaR methodology, assumptions and limitations, see Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market RiskRisk ManagementMarket RiskVaR Methodology, Assumptions and Limitations in Part II, Item 7A of the 2014 Form 10-K.
The Company utilizes the same VaR model for risk management purposes as well as for regulatory capital calculations. The Companys VaR model has been approved by the Companys regulators for use in regulatory capital calculations.
The portfolio of positions used for the Companys VaR for risk management purposes (Management VaR) differs from that used for regulatory capital requirements (Regulatory VaR), as Management VaR contains certain positions that are excluded from Regulatory VaR. Examples include counterparty Credit Valuation Adjustments (CVA) and related hedges, as well as loans that are carried at fair value and associated hedges.
Table 1 below presents the Management VaR for the Companys Trading portfolio, on a period-end, quarterly average and quarterly high and low basis. To further enhance the transparency of the Companys traded market risk, the Credit Portfolio VaR has been disclosed as a separate category from the Primary Risk Categories. The Credit Portfolio includes counterparty CVA and related hedges, as well as loans that are carried at fair value and associated hedges.
Trading Risks.
The table below presents the Companys 95%/one-day Management VaR:
Market Risk Category
Interest rate and credit spread
Equity price
Foreign exchange rate
Commodity price
Less: Diversification benefit(1)(2)
Primary Risk Categories
Credit Portfolio
Total Management VaR
N/ANot Applicable
The Companys average Total Management VaR for the quarter ended September 30, 2015 was $53 million compared with $54 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2015. This decrease was driven by reduced trading risks offset by higher market volatility.
Distribution of VaR Statistics and Net Revenues for the quarter ended September 30, 2015. One method of evaluating the reasonableness of the Companys VaR model as a measure of the Companys potential volatility of net revenues is to compare VaR with actual trading revenues. Assuming no intraday trading, for a 95%/one-day VaR, the expected number of times that trading losses should exceed VaR during the year is 13, and, in general, if trading losses were to exceed VaR more than 21 times in a year, the adequacy of the VaR model would be questioned. The Company evaluates the reasonableness of its VaR model by comparing the potential declines in portfolio values generated by the model with actual trading results for the Company, as well as individual business units. For days where losses exceed the VaR statistic, the Company examines the drivers of trading losses to evaluate the VaR models accuracy relative to realized trading results.
The distribution of VaR Statistics and Net Revenues is presented in the histograms below for both the Primary Risk Categories and the Total Trading populations.
Primary Risk Categories. As shown in Table 1, the Companys average 95%/one-day Primary Risk Categories VaR for the quarter ended September 30, 2015 was $50 million. The histogram below presents the distribution of the Companys daily 95%/one-day Primary Risk Categories VaR for the quarter ended September 30, 2015, which was in a range between $45 million and $54 million for approximately 97% of the trading days during the quarter.
The histogram below shows the distribution for the quarter ended September 30, 2015 of daily net trading revenues, including profits and losses from positions included in VaR for the Companys businesses that comprise the Primary Risk Categories. Daily net trading revenues also include intraday trading activities but exclude certain items not captured in the VaR model, such as fees, commissions and net interest income. Daily net trading revenues differ from the definition of revenues required for Regulatory VaR backtesting, which further excludes intraday trading. During the quarter ended September 30, 2015, the Companys businesses that comprise the Primary Risk Categories experienced net trading losses on 11 days, of which no day was in excess of the 95%/one-day Primary Risk Categories VaR.
Total TradingIncluding the Primary Risk Categories and the Credit Portfolio. As shown in Table 1, the Companys average 95%/one-day Total Management VaR, which includes the Primary Risk Categories and the Credit Portfolio, for the quarter ended September 30, 2015 was $53 million. The histogram below presents the distribution of the Companys daily 95%/one-day Total Management VaR for the quarter ended September 30, 2015, which was in a range between $49 million and $57 million for approximately 95% of trading days during the quarter.
The histogram below shows the distribution for the quarter ended September 30, 2015 of daily net trading revenues, including profits and losses from Primary Risk Categories, Credit Portfolio positions and intraday trading activities, for the Companys Trading businesses. Daily net trading revenues also include intraday trading activities but exclude certain items not captured in the VaR model, such as fees, commissions and net interest income. Daily net trading revenues differ from the definition of revenues required for Regulatory VaR backtesting, which further excludes intraday trading. During the quarter ended September 30, 2015, the Company experienced net trading losses on 13 days, of which no day was in excess of the 95%/one-day Total Management VaR.
Non-trading Risks.
The Company believes that sensitivity analysis is an appropriate representation of the Companys non-trading risks. Reflected below is this analysis covering substantially all of the non-trading risk in the Companys portfolio.
Counterparty Exposure Related to the Companys Own Credit Spread. The credit spread risk sensitivity of the counterparty exposure related to the Companys own credit spread corresponded to an increase in value of approximately $6 million for each 1 basis point widening in the Companys credit spread level at both September 30, 2015 and June 30, 2015.
Funding Liabilities. The credit spread risk sensitivity of the Companys mark-to-market funding liabilities corresponded to an increase in value of approximately $10 million and $11 million for each 1 basis point widening in the Companys credit spread level at September 30, 2015 and June 30, 2015, respectively.
Interest Rate Risk Sensitivity. The table below presents the estimated impact of selected hypothetical instantaneous upward and downward parallel interest rate shocks on net interest income over the next 12 months for the Companys U.S. Bank Subsidiaries. These shocks are applied to the Companys 12-month forecast for its U.S. Bank Subsidiaries, which incorporates market expectations of interest rates and the Companys forecasted business activity, including its deposit deployment strategy and asset-liability management hedges. Thus, the impacts are incremental to that forecast, and additionally, do not reflect the impact of the repricing of assets and liabilities beyond 12 months. The Company does not manage to any single rate scenario, but rather manages net interest income in its U.S. Bank Subsidiaries to optimize across a range of possible outcomes.
Impact on the Companys U.S. Bank Subsidiaries net interest income:
At June 30, 2015
Investments. The Company makes investments in both public and private companies. These investments are predominantly equity positions with long investment horizons, the majority of which are for business facilitation purposes. The market risk related to these investments is measured by estimating the potential reduction in net income associated with a 10% decline in investment values and related impact on performance fees.
Investments related to Investment Management activities:
Private equity and infrastructure funds
Hedge fund investments
Other investments:
Mitsubishi UFJ Morgan Stanley Securities Co., Ltd.
Other Company investments
Equity Market Sensitivity. In the Companys Wealth Management and Investment Management business segments, certain fee-based revenue streams are driven by the value of clients equity holdings. The overall level of revenues for these streams also depends on multiple additional factors that include, but are not limited to, the level and duration of the equity market decline, price volatility, the geographic and industry mix of client assets, the rate and magnitude of client investments and redemptions, and the impact of such market decline and price volatility on client behavior. Therefore, overall revenues do not correlate completely with changes in the equity markets.
Credit Risk.
Credit risk refers to the risk of loss arising when a borrower, counterparty or issuer does not meet its financial obligations to the Company. For a further discussion of the Companys credit risks, see Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market RiskRisk ManagementCredit Risk in Part II, Item 7A of the 2014 Form 10-K. Also, see Notes 7 and 11 to the condensed consolidated financial statements in Item 1 for additional information about the Companys loans and lending commitments, respectively.
Lending Activities.
The Company provides loans to a variety of customers, from large corporate and institutional clients to high net worth individuals. In addition, the Company purchases loans in the secondary market. Loans held for investment and loans held for sale are classified in Loans, and loans held at fair value are classified in Trading assets in the Companys condensed consolidated statements of financial condition. See Notes 3 and 7 to the Companys condensed consolidated financial statements in Item 1 for further information.
The following tables present the Companys loan portfolio by loan type within its Institutional Securities and Wealth Management business segments at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014.
Loans held for investment, net of allowance
Loans held for sale
Loans held at fair value
Total loans(4)
At September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the allowance for loan losses related to loans that were accounted for as held for investment was $173 million and $149 million, respectively, and the allowance for commitment losses related to lending commitments that were accounted for as held for investment was $161 million and $149 million, respectively. The aggregate allowance for loan and commitment losses for loans and lending commitments, respectively, increased over the nine months ended September 30, 2015 due primarily to the growth in the portfolios, and reflected the high quality of the Companys lending portfolios resulting from strong credit risk management. See Note 7 to the Companys condensed consolidated financial statements in Item 1 for further information.
Institutional Securities Corporate Lending Activities.
For a discussion of the Companys Institutional Securities corporate lending activities, see Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market RiskRisk ManagementCredit RiskInstitutional Securities Corporate Lending Activities in Part II, Item 7A of the 2014 Form 10-K.
The Companys credit exposure from its corporate lending positions and lending commitments are measured in accordance with the Companys internal risk management standards. Lending commitments represent legally binding obligations to provide funding to clients for all lending transactions. Since commitments associated with these business activities may expire unused or may not be utilized to full capacity, they do not necessarily reflect the actual future cash funding requirements.
The following tables present the Companys Institutional Securities Corporate Lending Commitments and Loans at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014.
Credit Rating(1)
At September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the aggregate amount of investment grade loans was $5.7 billion and $6.3 billion, respectively, and the aggregate amount of non-investment grade loans was $9.6 billion and $9.9 billion, respectively. In connection with the Companys lending activities (which include both loans and lending commitments), the Company had hedges (which included single name, sector and index hedges) with a notional amount of $14.1 billion related to the total corporate lending exposure of $115.9 billion at September 30, 2015 and with a notional amount of $12.9 billion related to the total corporate lending exposure of $98.0 billion at December 31, 2014. At September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, there were no significant loans and lending commitments held for investment under non-accrual status within Corporate Lending, as no significant loans or lending commitments were past due or had payments that were in doubt.
Event-Driven Loans and Lending Commitments. Included in the total corporate lending exposure amounts in the table above at September 30, 2015 were event-driven exposures of $30.4 billion composed of loans of $4.2 billion and lending commitments of $26.2 billion. Included in the event-driven exposure at September 30, 2015 were $15.8 billion of loans and lending commitments to non-investment grade borrowers. The maturity profile of these event-driven loans and lending commitments at September 30, 2015 were as follows: 31% will mature in less than 1 year, 19% will mature within 1 to 3 years, 20% will mature within 3 to 5 years and 30% will mature in over 5 years.
Industry ExposureCorporate Lending. The Company also monitors its credit exposure to individual industries for credit exposure arising from corporate loans and lending commitments as discussed below.
The following table presents the Companys Institutional Securities credit exposure from its primary Corporate Lending Commitments and Loans by industry:
Industry(1)
Energy
Utilities
Healthcare
Information technology
Consumer discretionary
Industrials
Funds, exchanges and other financial services(2)
Consumer staples
Materials
Real Estate
Telecommunications services
Insurance
Institutional Securities Other Lending Activities.
In addition to the primary corporate lending activities described above, the Companys Institutional Securities business segment engages in other lending activities. These activities include commercial and residential mortgage lending, asset-backed lending, corporate loans purchased in the secondary market, financing extended to equities and commodities customers, and loans to municipalities. At September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, there were no significant loans and lending commitments held for investment under non-accrual status as no significant loans or lending commitments were past due or had payments that were in doubt.
The following tables present the Companys Institutional Securities business segments other loans by remaining contract maturity:
Institutional Securities Lending Exposures Related to the Energy Industry. At September 30, 2015, Institutional Securities loans and lending commitments related to the energy industry were $17.2 billion ($15.9 billion for Corporate Lending and $1.3 billion for Other Lending activities), which were relatively unchanged from June 30, 2015. Approximately two thirds of these energy industry loans and lending commitments were to investment grade counterparties. The energy industry portfolio included $1.5 billion in loans and $2.7 billion in lending commitments to Oil and Gas Exploration and Production (E&P) companies. The E&P loans were principally to non-investment grade counterparties, while the E&P lending commitments were essentially split between investment grade and non-investment grade counterparties. Such loans and lending commitments to non-investment grade counterparties are subject to semi-annual borrowing base reassessments based on the value of the underlying oil and gas reserves pledged as collateral.
Margin Lending. In addition, Institutional Securities other lending activities include margin lending, which allows the client to borrow against the value of qualifying securities. At September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, Institutional Securities margin lending of $11.0 billion and $15.3 billion, respectively, were classified within Customer and other receivables in the Companys condensed consolidated statements of financial condition.
Wealth Management Lending Activities.
The principal Wealth Management lending activities include securities-based lending and residential real estate loans. The following tables present the Companys Wealth Management business segment lending activities by remaining contract maturity:
Securities-based lending provided to the Companys retail clients is primarily conducted through the Companys PLA and LAL platforms which had an outstanding loan balance of $23.8 billion and $19.1 billion at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. These loans allow the client to borrow money against the value of qualifying securities for any purpose other than purchasing securities. For a further discussion on the Companys credit lines against the value of qualifying securities see Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market RiskRisk ManagementCredit RiskWealth Management Lending Activities in Part II, Item 7A of the 2014 Form 10-K.
Residential real estate loans consist of first and second lien mortgages, including home equity lines of credit (HELOC) loans. The vast majority of mortgage and HELOC loans are held for investment in the Companys Wealth Management business segments loan portfolio. For a discussion of the Companys residential real estate loan evaluation process see Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market RiskRisk ManagementCredit RiskWealth Management Lending Activities in Part II, Item 7A of the 2014 Form 10-K.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, loans and lending commitments associated with the Companys Wealth Management business segment lending activities increased by approximately 22%, mainly due to growth in PLA, LAL and residential real estate loans. At September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, approximately 99.9% of the Companys Wealth Management business segment lending activities held for investment were current; while approximately 0.1% were on non-accrual status because the loans were past due for a period of 90 days or more or payment of principal or interest was in doubt.
The Companys Wealth Management business segment also provides margin lending to clients and had an outstanding balance of $14.7 billion and $13.7 billion at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively, which were classified within Customer and other receivables within the Companys condensed consolidated statements of financial condition.
In addition, the Companys Wealth Management business segment has employee loans that are granted primarily in conjunction with programs established by the Company to recruit and retain certain employees. These loans, recorded in Customer and other receivables in the Companys condensed consolidated statements of financial condition, are full recourse, require periodic payments and have repayment terms ranging from 2 to 12 years. The Company establishes an allowance for loan amounts it does not consider recoverable from terminated employees, which is recorded in Compensation and benefits expense.
Credit ExposureDerivatives.
For a discussion of the Companys credit exposure to derivative contracts, see Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market RiskRisk ManagementCredit RiskCredit ExposureDerivatives in Part II, Item 7A of the 2014 Form 10-K.
The following tables summarize the key characteristics of the Companys credit derivative portfolio by counterparty type at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014. The fair values shown are before the application of contractual netting or collateral. For additional credit exposure information on the Companys credit derivative portfolio, see Note 4 to the Companys condensed consolidated financial statements in Item 1.
Banks and securities firms
Insurance and other financial institutions
Non-financial entities
Industry ExposureOTC Derivative Products.
The Company also monitors its credit exposure to individual industries for current exposure arising from the Companys OTC derivative contracts.
The following table shows the Companys OTC derivative products at fair value, net of collateral, by industry:
Regional governments
Not-for-profit organizations
Special purpose vehicles
Sovereign governments
Real estate
Total(3)
In addition to the activities noted above, there are other credit risks managed by the Companys Credit Risk Management Department and various business areas within the Companys Institutional Securities business segment. The Company participates in securitization activities whereby it extends short-term or long-term funding to clients through loans and lending commitments that are secured by the assets of the borrower and generally provide for over-collateralization, including commercial real estate loans, loans secured by loan pools, commercial company loans, and secured lines of revolving credit. Credit risk with respect to these loans and lending commitments arises from the failure of a borrower to perform according to the terms of the loan agreement or a decline in the underlying collateral value. See Note 12 to the Companys condensed consolidated financial statements in Item 1 for information about the Companys securitization activities. In addition, a collateral management group monitors collateral levels against requirements and oversees the administration of the collateral function. See Note 6 to the Companys condensed consolidated financial statements in Item 1 for additional information about the Companys collateralized transactions.
Country Risk Exposure.
Country risk exposure is the risk that uncertainties arising from the economic, social, security and political conditions within a foreign country (any country other than the U.S.) will adversely affect the ability of the sovereign government and/or obligors within the country to honor their obligations to the Company. The Company actively manages country risk exposure through a comprehensive risk management framework that combines credit and market fundamentals and allows the Company to effectively identify, monitor and limit country risk. For a further discussion of the Companys country risk exposure see Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market RiskRisk ManagementCredit Risk Country Risk Exposure in Part II, Item 7A of the 2014 Form 10-K.
The Companys sovereign exposures consist of financial instruments entered into with sovereign and local governments. Its non-sovereign exposures consist of exposures to primarily corporations and financial institutions. The following table shows the Companys ten largest non-U.S. country risk net exposures at September 30, 2015. Index credit derivatives are included in the Companys country risk exposure tables. Each reference entity within an index is allocated to that reference entitys country of risk. Index exposures are allocated to the underlying reference entities in proportion to the notional weighting of each reference entity in the index, adjusted for any fair value receivable/payable for that reference entity. Where credit risk crosses multiple jurisdictions, for example, a CDS purchased from an issuer in a specific country that references bonds issued by an entity in a different country, the fair value of the CDS is reflected in the Net Counterparty Exposure column based on the country of the CDS issuer. Further, the notional amount of the CDS adjusted for the fair value of the receivable/payable is reflected in the Net Inventory column based on the country of the underlying reference entity.
Country
United Kingdom:
Sovereigns
Non-sovereigns
France:
Brazil:
Germany:
China:
Canada:
Singapore:
Australia:
Netherlands:
Italy:
Country Risk Exposures Related to Brazil and China.
At September 30, 2015, the Companys country risk exposures in Brazil included net exposures of $4,670 million (shown in the above table). The Companys sovereign net exposures in Brazil were principally in the form of local-currency government bonds held onshore to support client activity. The $1,110 million (shown in the above table) of exposures to non-sovereigns were diversified across both names and sectors. The Companys net exposure in Brazil increased from June 30, 2015, reflecting changes in local currency bond positions resulting primarily from changes in client activity.
At September 30, 2015, the Companys country risk exposures in China included net exposures of $3,560 million (shown in the above table) and overnight deposits with international banks of $1,411 million. The $2,971 million (shown in the above table) of exposures to non-sovereigns were diversified across both names and sectors and were primarily concentrated in high quality positions with negligible direct exposure to onshore equities. The Companys net exposure in China declined from June 30, 2015, reflecting a combination of repayments and return of collateral, a reduction of positions in government and quasi-government bonds, and increased hedging.
Under the supervision and with the participation of the Companys management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)). Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.
No change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act) occurred during the period covered by this report that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
FINANCIAL DATA SUPPLEMENT (Unaudited)
Average Balances and Interest Rates and Net Interest Income
Interest earning assets:
Trading assets(1):
U.S.
Non-U.S.
Interest bearing deposits with banks:
Securities purchased under agreements to resell and Securities borrowed(2):
Customer receivables and Other(3):
Non-interest earning assets
Liabilities and Equity
Interest bearing liabilities:
Deposits:
Short-term borrowings(4):
Long-term borrowings(4):
Trading liabilities(1):
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase and Securities loaned(5):
Customer payables and Other(6):
Non-interest bearing liabilities and equity
Net interest income and net interest rate spread
FINANCIAL DATA SUPPLEMENT (Unaudited)(Continued)
Rate/Volume Analysis
The following tables set forth an analysis of the effect on net interest income of volume and rate changes:
Interest earning assets
Trading Assets:
Securities purchased under agreements to resell and Securities borrowed:
Customer receivables and Other:
Change in interest income
Interest bearing liabilities
Short-term borrowings:
Long-term borrowings:
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase and Securities loaned:
Customer payables and Other:
Change in interest expense
Change in net interest income
Part IIOther Information.
The following new matters and developments have occurred since previously reporting certain matters in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 (the Form 10-K) and the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2015 (the First Quarter Form 10-Q) and June 30, 2015 (the Second Quarter Form 10-Q). See also the disclosures set forth under Legal Proceedings in Part I, Item 3 of the Form 10-K and Part II, Item 1 of the First Quarter Form 10-Q and Second Quarter Form 10-Q.
Residential Mortgage and Credit Crisis Related Matters.
Other Litigation.
On August 12, 2015, the plaintiff in Bank Hapoalim B.M. v. Morgan Stanley et al. filed a stipulation of discontinuance with prejudice.
On August 17, 2015, the parties in Commerzbank AG London Branch v. UBS AG et al. filed a stipulation of discontinuance with prejudice.
On August 19, 2015, the Company filed a Notice of Appeal of the courts decision in HSH Nordbank AG et al. v. Morgan Stanley et al. on the Companys motion to dismiss the complaint, and on August 20, 2015, the plaintiffs filed a Notice of Cross-Appeal. On August 25, 2015, the plaintiffs filed a motion for leave to amend their complaint.
On October 2, 2015, the defendants in Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Colonial Bank v. Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC et al. filed a motion for summary judgment with respect to the plaintiffs claims in their entirety.
On October 20, 2015, the court in Deutsche Bank National Trust Company solely in its capacity as Trustee of the Morgan Stanley ABS Capital I Inc. Trust 2007-NC4 v. Morgan Stanley Mortgage Capital Holdings LLC as Successor-by-Merger to Morgan Stanley Mortgage Capital Inc., and Morgan Stanley ABS Capital I Inc. granted in part and denied in part the Companys motion to dismiss.
Matters Related to the CDS Market.
On September 30, 2015, the Company reached an agreement with plaintiffs in In Re: Credit Default Swaps Antitrust Litigation to settle the litigation. The settlement is subject to court approval.
Currency Related Matters.
Class Action Litigation.
On September 11, 2015, several foreign exchange dealers (including the Company and an affiliate) were named as defendants in a purported class action filed in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice styled Christopher Staines v. Royal Bank of Canada, et al. The plaintiff has made allegations similar to those in the In Re Foreign Exchange Benchmark Rates Antitrust Litigation and seeks C$1 billion as well as C$50 million in punitive damages. On September 16, 2015, a parallel proceeding was initiated in Quebec Superior Court styled Christine Beland v. Royal Bank of Canada, et al. based on similar allegations and seeking C$100 million as well as C$50 million in punitive damages.
Wealth Management Related Matters.
The Company is currently defending itself in an ongoing arbitration styled Lynnda L. Speer, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Roy M. Speer, et al. v. Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC, et al., which is pending before a Financial Industry Regulatory Authority arbitration panel in the state of Florida. Plaintiffs assert claims for excessive trading, unauthorized use of discretion, undue influence, negligence and negligent supervision, constructive fraud, abuse of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment and violations of several Florida statutes in connection with brokerage accounts owned by a former high-net worth wealth management client who is now deceased. Plaintiffs are seeking disgorgement, compensatory damages, statutory damages, punitive damages and treble damages under various factual and legal theories.
The table below sets forth the information with respect to purchases made by or on behalf of the Company of its common stock during the quarterly period ended September 30, 2015.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
(dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
Period
Month #1
(July 1, 2015July 31, 2015)
Share Repurchase Program(A)
Employee Transactions(B)
Month #2
(August 1, 2015August 31, 2015)
Month #3
(September 1, 2015September 30, 2015)
On November 3, 2015, the Compensation, Management Development and Succession Committee of the Board of Directors (the Committee) approved an amendment of the Companys Directors and Officers allowance program for members of the Companys Operating Committee who are identified as Code Staff, including the Companys President of Institutional Securities. The amendment, which was made at the direction of the Companys regulators in the U.K. and will have effect as of November 3, 2015, provides for payment of a Code Staff employees annual Director and Officer allowance on a pro-rated basis for the period during the year for which he or she performed his or her Director and Officer role should his or her employment terminate or role cease for any reason.
An exhibit index has been filed as part of this Report on Page E-1.
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
(Registrant)
Jonathan Pruzan
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
Paul C. Wirth
Deputy Chief Financial Officer
Date: November 3, 2015
EXHIBIT INDEX
Quarter Ended September 30, 2015
Exhibit No.
Description