Teleflex - 10-Q quarterly report FY

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange ActRule 12b-2).

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined inRule 12b-2of the Act).

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of Common Stock, as of July 19, 2006:

Teleflex Incorporated (the “Company”) is a diversified industrial company specializing in the design, manufacture and distribution of specialty-engineered products. The Company serves a wide range of customers in niche segments of the commercial, medical and aerospace industries. The Company’s products include: driver controls, motion controls, power and vehicle management systems and fluid management systems for commercial industries; disposable medical products, surgical instruments, medical devices and specialty devices for hospitals and health-care providers; and repair products and services, precision-machined components and cargo-handling systems for commercial and military aviation as well as other industrial markets.

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and in accordance with the instructions forForm 10-QandRule 10-01ofRegulation S-X.Accordingly, they do not include all information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements.

The accompanying financial information is unaudited; however, in the opinion of the Company’s management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments and accruals) necessary for a fair statement of the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods reported have been included. The results of operations for the periods reported are not necessarily indicative of those that may be expected for a full year.

This quarterly report should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements presented in the Company’s Annual Report onForm 10-Kfor the fiscal year ended December 25, 2005 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

During the second quarter of 2006, the Company determined that variousout-of-periodadjustments were required to correct errors in its financial statements. These errors related to (1) tax balance sheet accounts that were incorrectly stated as a result of discrete errors in the Company’s tax accounting analyses and computations in prior periods; (2) overstatement of inventory balances at one of the Company’s facilities identified during a physical inventory at that location; and (3) customer funded tooling that was not appropriately expensed in prior periods. Correction of these errors increased Materials, labor and other product costs by $2,508 and decreased Taxes on income from continuing operations by $7,327. As a result, the Company recorded an increase in Income from continuing operations for the quarter of $4,819 to correct these errors. Based on the Company’s analysis of these matters, the Company has concluded that these matters are not material on a quantitative or qualitative basis.

The Company has revised its condensed consolidated statements of cash flows to attribute cash flows from discontinued operations to each of operating, financing and investing activities. Previously, the Company reported cash flows from discontinued operations as one line item. The Company has also revised its condensed consolidated statements of cash flows to attribute payments to minority interest shareholders as cash flows from financing activities of continuing operations. Previously, the Company reported these cash flows as part of cash flows from operating activities of continuing operations. The Company revised its 2005 condensed consolidated balance sheet to adjust for the netting of non-current deferred tax assets and liabilities. In addition, certain reclassifications have been made to the prior year condensed consolidated financial statements to conform to current period presentation. Certain financial information is presented on a rounded basis, which may cause minor differences.

Stock-based compensation:  On December 26, 2005, the Company adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment,” which requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all stock-based awards made to employees based on estimated fair values. SFAS No. 123(R) supersedes previous accounting under Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” for periods beginning in fiscal 2006. In March 2005, the SEC

SFAS No. 123(R) requires companies to estimate the fair value of stock-based awards on the date of grant using an option pricing model. The value of the portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as expense over the requisite service periods. The Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R) using the modified prospective application method, which requires the application of the standard starting from December 26, 2005, the first day of the Company’s 2006 fiscal year. The Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements for the three and six months ended June 25, 2006 reflect the impact of SFAS No. 123(R).

Stock-based compensation expense related to employee stock options recognized under SFAS No. 123(R) for the three and six months ended June 25, 2006 was $1,658 and $3,305, respectively, and is included in selling, engineering and administrative expenses. The total income tax benefit recognized for share-based compensation arrangements for the three and six months ended June 25, 2006 was $300 and $622, respectively. As of June 25, 2006, total unamortized stock-based compensation cost related to non-vested stock options was $11,938, net of expected forfeitures, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.2 years.

Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), the Company accounted for stock-based awards to employees using the intrinsic value method in accordance with APB No. 25, as allowed under SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.” Under the intrinsic value method, no stock-based compensation expense for employee stock options had been recognized in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations because the exercise price of the Company’s stock options granted to employees equaled the fair market value of the underlying stock at the date of grant. In accordance with the modified prospective transition method the Company used in adopting SFAS No. 123(R), the Company’s results of operations prior to fiscal 2006 have not been restated to reflect, and do not include, the impact of SFAS No. 123(R).

Stock-based compensation expense recognized during a period is based on the value of the portion of stock-based awards that is ultimately expected to vest during the period. Stock-based compensation expense recognized in the three and six months ended June 25, 2006 included compensation expense for (1) stock-based awards granted prior to, but not yet vested as of December 25, 2005, based on the fair value on the grant date estimated in accordance with the pro forma provisions of SFAS No. 123 and (2) compensation expense for the stock-based awards granted subsequent to December 25, 2005, based on the fair value on the grant date estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R). As stock-based compensation expense recognized for the second quarter and first six months of fiscal 2006 is based on awards ultimately expected to vest, it has been reduced for estimated forfeitures. SFAS No. 123(R) requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates.

The following table illustrates the pro forma net income and earnings per share for the three and six months ended June 26, 2005 as if compensation expense for stock options issued to employees had been determined consistent with SFAS No. 123:

Stock-based compensation expense is measured using a multiple point Black-Scholes option pricing model that takes into account highly subjective and complex assumptions. The expected life of options granted is derived from the vesting period of the award, as well as historical exercise behavior, and represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding. Expected volatilities are based on a blend of historical volatility and implied volatility derived from publicly traded options to purchase the Company’s common stock, which the Company believes is more reflective of the market conditions and a better indicator of expected volatility than solely using historical volatility. The risk-free interest rate is the implied yield currently available on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues with a remaining term equal to the expected life of the option.

The fair value for options granted in 2006 was estimated at the date of grant using a multiple point Black-Scholes option pricing model. The fair value for options granted in 2005 was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The following weighted-average assumptions were used:

On November 10, 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) No. FAS 123(R)-3, “Transition Election Related to Accounting for Tax Effects of Share-Based Payment Awards,” that allows for a simplified method to establish the beginning balance of the additional paid-in capital pool (“APIC Pool”) related to the tax effects of employee stock-based compensation and to determine the subsequent impact on the APIC Pool and consolidated statements of cash flows of the tax effects of employee stock-based compensation awards that are outstanding upon adoption of SFAS No. 123(R). During the second quarter of 2006, the Company elected to adopt the simplified method.

See Note 9 for additional information regarding the Company’s stock compensation plans.

Inventory Costs:  In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, “Inventory Costs, an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4,” which clarifies the types of costs that should be expensed rather than capitalized as inventory. This statement also clarifies the circumstances under which fixed overhead costs associated with operating facilities involved in inventory processing should be capitalized. The provisions of SFAS No. 151 are effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company adopted the provisions of this statement on December 26, 2005 and it did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Stock-Based Compensation:  In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment,” which establishes accounting standards for transactions in which an entity receives employee services in exchange for (a) equity instruments of the entity or (b) liabilities that are based on the fair value of the entity’s equity instruments or that may be settled by the issuance of equity instruments. SFAS No. 123(R) requires an entity to recognize the grant-date fair value of stock options and other equity-based compensation issued to employees in the statement of income. The statement also requires that such transactions be accounted for using thefair-value-basedmethod, thereby eliminating use of the intrinsic value method of accounting in APB No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” which was permitted under Statement 123, as originally issued. SFAS No. 123(R) is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company adopted the provisions of this statement on December 26, 2005 using modified prospective application. See the “Stock-based compensation” section of Note 1 above for the effect of adoption on the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

Accounting Changes and Error Corrections:  In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections.” SFAS No. 154 replaces APB Opinion No. 20, “Accounting Changes” and SFAS No. 3, “Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements” and changes the requirements of the accounting for and reporting of a change in accounting principle. SFAS No. 154 also provides guidance on the accounting for and reporting of error corrections. The provisions of this statement are applicable for accounting changes and error corrections made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. The Company adopted the provisions of this statement on December 26, 2005 and it did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments:  In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155, “Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments.” SFAS No. 155 provides entities with relief from having to separately determine the fair value of an embedded derivative that would otherwise be required to be bifurcated from its host contract in accordance with SFAS No. 133. SFAS No. 155 allows an entity to make an irrevocable election to measure such a hybrid financial instrument at fair value in its entirety, with changes in fair value recognized in earnings. The election may be made on aninstrument-by-instrumentbasis and can be made only when a hybrid financial instrument is initially recognized or when certain events occur that constitute a remeasurement (i.e., new basis) event for a previously recognized hybrid financial instrument. An entity must document its election to measure a hybrid financial instrument at fair value, either concurrently or via a preexisting policy for automatic election. Once the fair value election has been made, that hybrid financial instrument may not be designated as a hedging instrument pursuant to SFAS No. 133. Additionally, SFAS No. 155 requires that interests in securitized financial assets be evaluated to identify whether they are freestanding derivatives or hybrid financial instruments containing an embedded derivative that requires bifurcation (previously, these were exempt from SFAS No. 133). When determining whether an interest in securitized financial assets is a hybrid financial instrument, SFAS No. 155 does not consider a concentration of credit risk, in the form of subordination of one interest in securitized assets to another, to be an embedded derivative. The provisions of this statement are applicable for all financial instruments acquired, issued or subject to a remeasurement (new basis) event occurring in fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2006. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of SFAS No. 155 on the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

Uncertain Tax Positions:  In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation (“FIN”) No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109.” FIN No. 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” FIN No. 48 requires that the impact of a tax position be recognized in the financial statements if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on tax audit, based on the technical merits of the position. FIN No. 48 also provides guidance on derecognition of tax positions that do not meet the “more likely than not” standard, classification of tax assets and liabilities, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. The provisions of FIN No. 48 are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company will evaluate over the remainder of 2006 the impact of FIN No. 48 on the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

In connection with the acquisition of Hudson Respiratory Care Inc. (“HudsonRCI”) in July 2004, the Company formulated a plan related to the future integration of the acquired entity. The Company finalized the integration plan during the second quarter of 2005 and the integration activities are ongoing as of June 25, 2006. The Company has accrued estimates for certain costs, related primarily to personnel reductions and facility closings and the termination of certain distribution agreements at the date of acquisition, in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) IssueNo. 95-3,“Recognition of Liabilities in Connection with a Purchase Business Combination.” As of June 25, 2006, the Company determined that the remaining integration cost accrual exceeded the total amount of the remaining estimated integration costs and therefore adjusted the accrual with a corresponding reduction to goodwill. Set forth below is a reconciliation of the Company’s future integration cost accrual:

In June 2006, the Company began certain restructuring initiatives that affect all three of the Company’s operating segments. These initiatives involve the consolidation of operations and a related reduction in workforce at several of the Company’s facilities in Europe and North America. The Company has determined to undertake these initiatives as a means to improving operating performance and to better leverage the Company’s existing resources.

For the three months ended June 25, 2006, the charges associated with the 2006 restructuring program by segment that are included in restructuring and impairment charges were as follows:

Termination benefits are comprised of severance-related payments for all employees terminated in connection with the 2006 restructuring program. Other restructuring costs include expenses primarily related to the consolidation of operations and the reorganization of administrative functions.

As of June 25, 2006, the Company expects to incur the following future restructuring costs associated with the 2006 restructuring program in its Commercial, Medical and Aerospace segments over the next four quarters:

At June 25, 2006, the accrued liability associated with the 2006 restructuring program consisted of the following and was entirely due within twelve months:

During the second quarter of 2006, the Company determined that a minority held investment was impaired and recorded a charge of $3,868, which is included in restructuring and impairment charges.

During the first quarter of 2006, the Company began a restructuring activity in its Aerospace Segment. The planned actions relate to the closure of a manufacturing facility, termination of employees and relocation of operations. For the three and six months ended June 25, 2006, the Company recorded $107 and $306, respectively, of termination benefits that are included in restructuring and impairment charges. As of June 25, 2006, the accrued liability associated with this activity was $306 and was entirely due within twelve months. The Company expects to incur future restructuring costs associated with this activity of approximately $1,200 during the remainder of 2006.

During the fourth quarter of 2004, the Company announced and commenced implementation of a restructuring and divestiture program designed to improve future operating performance and position the Company for future earnings growth. The actions have included exiting or divesting non-core or low performing businesses, consolidating manufacturing operations and reorganizing administrative functions to enable businesses to share services.

For the three and six months ended June 25, 2006 and the three and six months ended June 26, 2005, the charges, including changes in estimates, associated with the 2004 restructuring and divestiture program by segment that are included in restructuring and impairment charges were as follows:

Termination benefits are comprised of severance-related payments for all employees terminated in connection with the 2004 restructuring and divestiture program. Contract termination costs relate primarily to the termination of leases in conjunction with the consolidation of facilities in the Company’s Medical Segment and in 2005 also include a $531 reduction in the estimated cost associated with a lease termination in conjunction with the consolidation of manufacturing facilities in the Company’s Commercial Segment. Asset impairments relate primarily to machinery and equipment associated with the consolidation of manufacturing facilities. Other restructuring costs include expenses primarily related to the consolidation of manufacturing operations and the reorganization of administrative functions.

As of June 25, 2006, the Company expects to incur the following future restructuring costs associated with the 2004 restructuring and divestiture program in its Medical Segment during the remainder of 2006:

At June 25, 2006, the accrued liability associated with the 2004 restructuring and divestiture program consisted of the following and was entirely due within twelve months:

Inventories consisted of the following:

Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill, by operating segment, for the six months ended June 25, 2006 are as follows:

Intangible assets consisted of the following:

Amortization expense related to intangible assets was $3,196 and $6,671 for the three and six months ended June 25, 2006, respectively, and $3,583 and $7,368 for the three and six months ended June 26, 2005, respectively. Estimated annual amortization expense for each of the five succeeding years is as follows:

The following table summarizes the components of comprehensive income:

Set forth below is a reconciliation of the Company’s issued common shares:

On July 25, 2005, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $140 million of outstanding Teleflex common stock over twelve months ended July 2006. In June 2006, the Company’s Board of Directors extended for an additional six months, until January 2007, its authorization for the repurchase of shares. Under the approved plan, the Company repurchased (in thousands) a total of 1,056 shares on the open market during 2005 and the first six months of 2006 for an aggregate purchase price of $69,129, with 86 shares repurchased during

Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed in the same manner except that the weighted average number of shares is increased for dilutive securities. The difference between basic and diluted weighted average common shares results from the assumption that dilutive stock options were exercised. A reconciliation of basic to diluted weighted average shares outstanding is as follows:

Weighted average stock options (in thousands) that were antidilutive and therefore not included in the calculation of earnings per share were 263 and 237 for the three and six months ended June 25, 2006, respectively, and 213 and 387 for the three and six months ended June 26, 2005, respectively.

The Company has stock-based compensation plans that provide for the granting of incentive and non-qualified options to officers and key employees to purchase up to 4,000,000 shares of common stock at the market price of the stock on the dates options are granted. Outstanding options generally are exercisable three to five years after the date of the grant and expire no more than ten years after the grant.

The following table summarizes the option activity as of June 25, 2006 and changes during the six months then ended:

As of June 25, 2006, 889,098 shares were available for future grant under the plans.

The weighted average grant-date fair value was $14.94 and $14.33 for options granted during the three and six months ended June 25, 2006, respectively, and $12.10 and $12.25 for options granted during the three and six months ended June 26, 2005, respectively. The total intrinsic value of options exercised was $1,779 and $3,349 during the three and six months ended June 25, 2006, respectively, and $2,183 and $3,906 during the three and six months ended June 26, 2005, respectively.

The Company has a number of defined benefit pension and postretirement plans covering eligible U.S. andnon-U.S. employees.The defined benefit pension plans are primarily noncontributory. The benefits under these plans are based primarily on years of service and employees’ pay near retirement. The Company’s funding policy for U.S. plans is to contribute annually, at a minimum, amounts required by applicable laws and regulations. Obligations undernon-U.S. plansare systematically provided for by depositing funds with trustees or by book reserves.

The Company and certain of its subsidiaries provide medical, dental and life insurance benefits to pensioners and survivors. The associated plans are unfunded and approved claims are paid from Company funds.

Net benefit cost of pension and postretirement benefit plans consisted of the following:

Product warranty liability:  The Company warrants to the original purchaser of certain of its products that it will, at its option, repair or replace, without charge, such products if they fail due to a manufacturing defect. Warranty periods vary by product. The Company has recourse provisions for certain products that would enable recovery from third parties for amounts paid under the warranty. The Company accrues for product warranties when, based on available information, it is probable that customers will make claims under warranties relating to products that have been sold, and a reasonable estimate of the costs (based on historical claims experience relative to sales) can be made. Set forth below is a reconciliation of the Company’s estimated product warranty liability for the six months ended June 25, 2006:

Operating leases:  The Company uses various leased facilities and equipment in its operations. The terms for these leased assets vary depending on the lease agreement. The Company also has synthetic lease programs that are used primarily for plant and equipment. In connection with the synthetic and other leases, the Company had residual value guarantees in the amount of $6,859 at June 25, 2006. The Company’s future payments cannot exceed the minimum rent obligation plus the residual value guarantee amount. The guarantee amounts are tied to the unamortized lease values of the assets under synthetic lease, and are due should the Company decide neither to renew these leases, nor to exercise its purchase option. At June 25, 2006, the Company had no liabilities recorded

Accounts receivable securitization program:  The Company uses an accounts receivable securitization program to gain access to enhanced credit markets and reduce financing costs. As currently structured, the Company sells certain trade receivables on a non-recourse basis to a consolidated special purpose entity, which in turn sells an interest in those receivables to a commercial paper conduit. The conduit issues notes secured by that interest to third party investors. The assets of the special purpose entity are not available to satisfy the obligations of the Company. In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities,” transfers of assets under the program qualify as sales of receivables and accordingly, $40,068 of accounts receivable and the related amounts previously recorded in notes payable were removed from the condensed consolidated balance sheet as of both June 25, 2006 and December 25, 2005.

Environmental:  The Company is subject to contingencies pursuant to environmental laws and regulations that in the future may require the Company to take further action to correct the effects on the environment of prior disposal practices or releases of chemical or petroleum substances by the Company or other parties. Much of this liability results from the U.S. Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), often referred to as Superfund, the U.S. Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (“RCRA”) and similar state laws. These laws require the Company to undertake certain investigative and remedial activities at sites where the Company conducts or once conducted operations or at sites where Company-generated waste was disposed.

Remediation activities vary substantially in duration and cost from site to site. These activities, and their associated costs, depend on the mix of unique site characteristics, evolving remediation technologies, diverse regulatory agencies and enforcement policies, as well as the presence or absence of potentially responsible parties. At June 25, 2006, the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheet included an accrued liability of $6,215 relating to these matters. Considerable uncertainty exists with respect to these costs and, under adverse changes in circumstances, potential liability may exceed the amount accrued as of June 25, 2006. The time-frame over which the accrued amounts may be paid out, based on past history, is estimated to be 15-20 years.

Litigation:  The Company is a party to various lawsuits and claims arising in the normal course of business. These lawsuits and claims include actions involving product liability, intellectual property, employment and environmental matters. Based on information currently available, advice of counsel, established reserves and other resources, the Company does not believe that any such actions are likely to be, individually or in the aggregate, material to its business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. However, in the event of unexpected further developments, it is possible that the ultimate resolution of these matters, or other similar matters, if unfavorable, may be materially adverse to the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. Legal costs such as outside counsel fees and expenses are charged to expense in the period incurred.

In February 2004, a jury verdict of $34,800 was rendered against one of the Company’s subsidiaries in a trademark infringement action. In February 2005, the trial judge entered an order rejecting the jury award in its entirety. Both parties have filed notice to appeal on various grounds. While the Company cannot predict the outcome of the appeals, it will continue to vigorously contest this litigation. No accrual has been recorded in the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

Other:  The Company has various purchase commitments for materials, supplies and items of permanent investment incident to the ordinary conduct of business. In the aggregate, such commitments are not at prices in excess of current market.

Information about continuing operations by business segment is as follows:

During the second quarter of 2006, the Company recognized a $900 reduction in the carrying value of a small medical business to the estimated fair value of the business less costs to sell. Also during the second quarter of 2006, the Company recognized a pre-tax gain of $917 related to the first quarter 2005 divestiture of Sermatech International.

During the second quarter of 2005, the Company adopted a plan to sell a small medical business. The Company recognized a loss of $3,100 based upon the excess of the carrying value of the business as compared to the estimated fair value of the business less costs to sell. Also during the second quarter of 2005, the Company recognized a further pre-tax gain on sale of assets of $1,687 related to the first quarter 2005 divestiture of Sermatech International and recognized an $8,000 reduction in the carrying value of its Tier 1 automotive pedal systems business to the estimated fair value of the business less costs to sell.

For financial statement purposes, the assets, liabilities, results of operations and cash flows of these businesses have been segregated from those of continuing operations and are presented in the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements as discontinued operations and assets and liabilities held for sale.

Revenues of discontinued operations were $1,234 and $2,527 for the three and six months ended June 25, 2006, respectively, and $39,416 and $95,051 for the three and six months ended June 26, 2005, respectively. Operating income (loss) from discontinued operations was $304 and $449 for the three and six months ended June 25, 2006, respectively, and $(13,424) and $7,944 for the three and six months ended June 26, 2005, respectively.

As part of the Company’s 2006 restructuring program, the Company determined that assets totaling $4,062 met the criteria for held for sale classification during the second quarter of 2006. The assets are comprised primarily of land and a building that are no longer being used in the Company’s operations. The Company determined that the carrying value of each asset held for sale did not exceed the estimated fair value of the asset less costs to sell and therefore did not adjust the carrying value of the asset in the second quarter. During the second quarter of 2006, the Company sold certain assets and recognized a loss on this sale of $1,828. The Company is actively marketing its remaining assets held for sale.

Assets and liabilities held for sale are comprised of the following:

All statements made in this Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q,other than statements of historical fact, are forward-looking statements. The words “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “will,” “would,” “should,” “guidance,” “potential,” “continue,” “project,” “forecast,” “confident,” “prospects,” and similar expressions typically are used to identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are based on the then-current expectations, beliefs, assumptions, estimates and forecasts about our business and the industry and markets in which we operate. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions which are difficult to predict. Therefore, actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements due to a number of factors, including changes in business relationships with and purchases by or from major customers or suppliers, including delays or cancellations in shipments; demand for and market acceptance of new and existing products; our ability to integrate acquired businesses into our operations, realize planned synergies and operate such businesses profitably in accordance with expectations; our ability to effectively execute our restructuring programs; competitive market conditions and resulting effects on revenues and pricing; increases in raw material costs that cannot be recovered in product pricing; and global economic factors, including currency exchange rates and interest rates; difficulties entering new markets; and general economic conditions. For a further discussion of the risks that our business is subject to, see Item 1A of our Annual Report onForm 10-Kfor the fiscal year ended December 25, 2005. We expressly disclaim any intent or obligation to update these forward-looking statements, except as otherwise specifically stated by us.

We are focused on achieving consistent and sustainable growth through the continued development of our core businesses and carefully selected acquisitions. Our internal growth initiatives include the development of new products, moving existing products into market adjacencies in which we already participate with other products and the expansion of market share. Our core revenue growth in the second quarter of 2006 as compared to 2005, excluding the impacts of currency, acquisitions and divestitures, was 4%. Core growth was strongest in our Commercial Segment, which grew 8%, and weakest in our Medical Segment, which was flat year over year.

Total operating profit declined 3% in the second quarter of 2006 and includes $3.3 million of stock-based compensation expense, recognized in connection with our adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards, or SFAS, No. 123(R) in the first quarter of 2006. The second quarter was also negatively impacted by $1.0 million of legal and accounting costs related to a proposed acquisition that we decided not to pursue and a slower than expected recovery in our Medical Segment performance.

Discussion of growth from acquisitions reflects the impact of a purchased company up to twelve months beyond the date of acquisition. Activity beyond the initial twelve months is considered core growth. Core growth excludes the impact of translating the results of international subsidiaries at different currency exchange rates from year to year and the comparable activity of divested companies within the most recent twelve-month period. The following comparisons exclude the impact of the automotive pedal systems business, Sermatech International business, European medical product sterilization business and small medical business, which have been presented in our condensed consolidated financial results as discontinued operations.

Revenues increased 4% in the second quarter of 2006 to $682.6 million from $657.0 million in the second quarter of 2005. This increase was due principally to core growth. Revenues increased 3% in the first six months of 2006 to $1.31 billion from $1.28 billion in the first six months of 2005. This increase was due to an increase of 4% from core growth, offset, in part, by a decrease of 1% from currency. The Commercial, Medical and Aerospace segments comprised 49%, 32% and 19% of our revenues, respectively, for both the second quarter and first six months of 2006.

Materials, labor and other product costs as a percentage of revenues improved slightly to 70.3% in the second quarter of 2006 from 71.0% in the second quarter of 2005. Materials, labor and other product costs as a percentage of revenues improved to 70.6% in the first six months of 2006 from 71.6% in the first six months of 2005, due primarily to the benefits of our restructuring initiatives and other cost reduction efforts and the impact in the first six months of 2005 of certain inventory adjustments resulting from the 2004 restructuring and divestiture program. Selling, engineering and administrative expenses (operating expenses) as a percentage of revenues increased to 19.0% and 19.2% in the second quarter and first six months of 2006, respectively, compared with 17.7% and 18.2% in the second quarter and first six months of 2005, respectively, due primarily to costs associated with the initial phases of an information systems implementation program in our Medical Segment, the impact of $1.0 million of legal and accounting costs related to a proposed acquisition that we decided not to pursue, a slower than expected recovery in our Medical Segment performance and the impact of expensing stock options under SFAS No. 123(R).

Interest expense declined in the second quarter and first six months of 2006 principally as a result of lower debt balances. Interest income increased in the second quarter and first six months of 2006 primarily due to higher average cash balances and more favorable interest rates compared to the prior periods. The effective income tax rate was 21.20% and 24.48% in the second quarter and first six months of 2006, respectively, compared with 23.73% and 23.93% in the second quarter and first six months of 2005, respectively. During the second quarter of 2006, we decreased taxes on income from continuing operations by $7.3 million, of which $6.4 million related to tax balance sheet accounts that were incorrectly stated as a result of discrete errors in our tax accounting analyses and computations in prior periods. For a more complete discussion, see Note 1 to our condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q.Minority interest in consolidated subsidiaries increased $0.8 million and $1.7 million in the second quarter and first six months of 2006, respectively, due to increased profits from our entities that are not wholly-owned. Net income for the second quarter of 2006 was $36.6 million, an increase of 26% from the second quarter of 2005, due primarily to the lower effective tax rate in the second quarter of 2006 and the loss from discontinued operations in the second quarter of 2005. Net income for the first six months of 2006 was $65.7 million, a decline of 3% from the first six months of 2005, due primarily to the impact of the gain on the sale of the Sermatech business in the first six months of 2005, offset, in part, by the lower effective tax rate in the first six months of 2006. Diluted earnings per share increased 27% to $0.90 for the second quarter of 2006 and declined 2% to $1.62 for the first six months of 2006.

On December 26, 2005, we adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment,” which requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all stock-based awards made to employees based on estimated fair values. SFAS No. 123(R) supersedes previous accounting under Accounting Principles Board, or APB, Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” for periods beginning in fiscal 2006. In March 2005, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin, or SAB, No. 107, providing supplemental implementation guidance for SFAS 123(R). We have applied the provisions of SAB No. 107 in our adoption of SFAS No. 123(R).

SFAS No. 123(R) requires companies to estimate the fair value of stock-based awards on the date of grant using an option pricing model. The value of the portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as expense over the requisite service periods. We adopted SFAS No. 123(R) using the modified prospective application method, which requires the application of the standard starting from December 26, 2005, the first day of our 2006 fiscal year. Our condensed consolidated financial statements for the second quarter and first six months of 2006 reflect the impact of SFAS No. 123(R).

Stock-based compensation expense related to employee stock options recognized under SFAS No. 123(R) for the second quarter and first six months of 2006 was $1.7 million and $3.3 million, respectively, and is included in selling, engineering and administrative expenses. The total income tax benefit recognized for share-based compensation arrangements for the second quarter and first six months of 2006 was $0.3 million and $0.6 million, respectively. As of June 25, 2006, total unamortized stock-based compensation cost related to non-vested stock options was $11.9 million, net of expected forfeitures, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.2 years.

Additional information regarding stock-based compensation and our stock compensation plans is presented in Notes 1 and 9 to our condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q.

In June 2006, we began certain restructuring initiatives that affect all three of our operating segments. These initiatives involve the consolidation of operations and a related reduction in workforce at several of our facilities in Europe and North America. We have determined to undertake these initiatives as a means to improving operating performance and to better leverage our existing resources. The charges associated with the 2006 restructuring program that are included in restructuring and impairment charges during the second quarter of 2006 totaled $1.8 million, of which 27% and 73% were attributable to our Commercial and Medical segments, respectively. As of June 25, 2006, we expect to incur future restructuring costs associated with our 2006 restructuring program of between $6.4 million and $8.3 million in our Commercial, Medical and Aerospace segments over the next four quarters. During the second quarter of 2006, we determined that a minority held investment was impaired and recorded a charge of $3.9 million, which is included in restructuring and impairment charges.

During the first quarter of 2006, we began a restructuring activity in our Aerospace Segment. The planned actions relate to the closure of a manufacturing facility, termination of employees and relocation of operations. For the second quarter and first six months of 2006, we recorded $0.1 million and $0.3 million, respectively, of termination benefits that are included in restructuring and impairment charges. We expect to incur future restructuring costs associated with this activity of approximately $1.2 million during the remainder of 2006.

During the fourth quarter of 2004, we announced and commenced implementation of a restructuring and divestiture program designed to improve future operating performance and position us for future earnings growth. The actions have included exiting or divesting non-core or low performing businesses, consolidating manufacturing operations and reorganizing administrative functions to enable businesses to share services. The charges, including changes in estimates, associated with the 2004 restructuring and divestiture program for continuing operations that are included in restructuring and impairment charges during the second quarter and first six months of 2006 totaled $2.7 million and $7.0 million, respectively, and were attributable to our Medical Segment. The charges, including changes in estimates, associated with the 2004 restructuring and divestiture program for continuing operations that are included in restructuring and impairment charges during the second quarter and first six months of 2005 totaled $6.7 million and $13.9 million, respectively. Of the $6.7 million and $13.9 million, 25%, 69% and 6% and 15%, 63% and 22% were attributable to our Commercial, Medical and Aerospace segments, respectively. As of June 25, 2006, we expect to incur future restructuring costs associated with our 2004 restructuring and divestiture program of between $6.0 million and $8.0 million in our Medical Segment during the remainder of 2006.

For a more complete discussion of our restructuring programs, see Note 4 to our condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q.

The following is a discussion of our segment operating results.

Commercial Segment revenues increased 7% in the second quarter of 2006 to $337.2 million from $314.7 million in the second quarter of 2005. The increase was due to an 8% increase in core growth, offset, in part, by a 1% decrease from currency. Commercial Segment revenues increased 4% in the first six months of 2006 to $641.7 million from $618.5 million in the first six months of 2005. The increase was due to a 6% increase from core growth, offset, in part, by a decrease of 2% from currency. The segment benefited from increased sales of alternative fuel systems and auxiliary power systems, sales of heavy-duty rigging and cable used in marine construction and the securing of oil platforms and sales of automotive driver control products related to new platforms in the North American and Asian markets.

Commercial Segment operating profit declined 2% in the second quarter of 2006 to $25.0 million from $25.4 million in the second quarter of 2005 and declined 10% in the first six months of 2006 to $45.3 million from $50.2 million in the first six months of 2005. Weaker marine aftermarket sales and a $2.0 million charge related to an inventory shortfall at a facility negatively impacted the second quarter of 2006, while the less favorable product

Medical Segment revenues remained flat and were $217.8 million in the second quarter of 2006 compared to $218.0 million in the second quarter of 2005. Medical Segment revenues declined 2% in the first six months of 2006 to $420.9 million from $427.9 million in the first six months of 2005. The segment benefited from new product sales and sales of diagnostic and therapeutic device products sold to medical device manufacturers, offset by a decline in sales of orthopedic specialty devices sold to medical device manufacturers and lower volume for surgical instruments for the hospital market. The segment was also negatively impacted by currency translation.

Medical Segment operating profit declined 13% in the second quarter of 2006 to $37.3 million from $43.1 million in the second quarter of 2005 and declined 11% in the first six months of 2006 to $67.6 million from $75.9 million in the first six months of 2005. These declines were primarily the result of the impact of costs associated with operational inefficiencies resulting from consolidation of facilities and distribution centers and activities to support future growth, including the initial phases of an information systems implementation program and expanding Medical OEM capacity. Operating profit as a percent of revenues declined to 17.1% in the second quarter of 2006 from 19.8% in the second quarter of 2005 and declined to 16.1% in the first six months of 2006 from 17.7% in the first six months of 2005.

Aerospace Segment revenues increased 3% in the second quarter of 2006 to $127.7 million from $124.3 million in the second quarter of 2005. This increase was due to increases of 2% from core growth and 1% from acquisitions. Core growth primarily in repair products and services and cargo handling was partially offset by the phase out of our industrial gas turbine aftermarket services business in 2005. Aerospace Segment revenues increased 8% in the first six months of 2006 to $252.2 million from $234.2 million in the first six months of 2005. This increase was due to increases of 8% from core growth and 1% from acquisitions, offset, in part, by a 1% decrease from currency. All three principal businesses in the segment experienced core growth which was partially offset by the phase out of our industrial gas turbine business in 2005.

Aerospace Segment operating profit increased 73% in the second quarter of 2006 to $11.4 million from $6.6 million in the second quarter of 2005 and increased 167% in the first six months of 2006 to $22.8 million from $8.5 million in the first six months of 2005. Operating profit increased as a result of higher volume levels across the segment and the benefits of restructuring actions taken in 2005. Operating profit as a percent of revenues increased to 8.9% in the second quarter of 2006 from 5.3% in the second quarter of 2005 and increased to 9.0% in the first six months of 2006 from 3.6% in the first six months of 2005.

Operating activities from continuing operations provided net cash of $132.4 million during the first six months of 2006. Changes in our operating assets and liabilities during the first six months of 2006 resulted in a net cash outflow of $1.7 million, the most significant of which were a decrease in income taxes payable and deferred income taxes and an increase in inventories, offset, in part, by a decrease in accounts receivable. Our financing activities from continuing operations during the first six months of 2006 consisted primarily of a decrease in notes payable and current borrowings of $47.0 million, purchases of treasury stock of $22.6 million and payment of dividends of $21.6 million. Our investing activities from continuing operations during the first six months of 2006 consisted primarily of capital expenditures of $28.1 million. During the first six months of 2006, we also made a $5.6 million payment in connection with a post-closing purchase price adjustment based on working capital for a divested business and a $4.3 million deferred payment related to a prior period acquisition. Net cash provided by discontinued operations was $0.8 million in the first six months of 2006.

We use an accounts receivable securitization program to gain access to enhanced credit markets and reduce financing costs. As currently structured, we sell certain trade receivables on a non-recourse basis to a consolidated special purpose entity, which in turn sells an interest in those receivables to a commercial paper conduit. The conduit issues notes secured by that interest to third party investors. The assets of the special purpose entity are not available to satisfy our obligations. In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities,” transfers of assets under the program qualify as sales of receivables and accordingly, $40.1 million of accounts receivable and the related amounts previously recorded in notes payable were removed from the condensed consolidated balance sheet as of both June 25, 2006 and December 25, 2005.

On July 25, 2005, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $140 million of outstanding Teleflex common stock over twelve months ended July 2006. In June 2006, our Board of Directors extended for an additional six months, until January 2007, its authorization for the repurchase of shares. Under the approved plan, we repurchased a total of 1,055,600 shares on the open market during 2005 and the first six months of 2006 for an aggregate purchase price of $69.1 million, with 365,500 shares repurchased during the first six months of 2006 for an aggregate purchase price of $22.6 million. During July 2006, we repurchased 257,200 shares on the open market for an aggregate purchase price of $13.5 million.

The following table provides our net debt to total capital ratio:

The decline in our percent of net debt to total capital for June 25, 2006 as compared to December 25, 2005 is primarily due to the repayment of current and long-term borrowings during the first six months of 2006.

We believe that our cash flow from operations and our ability to access additional funds through credit facilities will enable us to fund our operating requirements, capital expenditures and additional acquisition opportunities.

There have been no significant changes in market risk for the quarter ended June 25, 2006. See the information set forth in Part II, Item 7A of the Company’s Annual Report onForm 10-Kfor the fiscal year ended December 25, 2005.

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report are functioning effectively to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and (ii) accumulated and communicated to our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure. A controls system cannot provide absolute assurance that the objectives of the controls system are met, and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been detected.

(b) Change in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

No change in our internal control over financial reporting occurred during our most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

We are a party to various lawsuits and claims arising in the normal course of business. These lawsuits and claims include actions involving product liability, intellectual property, employment and environmental matters. Based on information currently available, advice of counsel, established reserves and other resources, we do not believe that any such actions are likely to be, individually or in the aggregate, material to our business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. However, in the event of unexpected further developments, it is possible that the ultimate resolution of these matters, or other similar matters, if unfavorable, may be materially adverse to our business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

In February 2004, a jury verdict of $34.8 million was rendered against one of our subsidiaries in a trademark infringement action. In February 2005, the trial judge entered an order rejecting the jury award in its entirety. Both parties have filed notice to appeal on various grounds. While we cannot predict the outcome of the appeals, we will continue to vigorously contest this litigation.

There have been no significant changes in risk factors for the quarter ended June 25, 2006. See the information set forth in Part I, Item 1A of the Company’s Annual Report onForm 10-Kfor the fiscal year ended December 25, 2005.