Companies:
10,660
total market cap:
$138.088 T
Sign In
๐บ๐ธ
EN
English
$ USD
โฌ
EUR
๐ช๐บ
โน
INR
๐ฎ๐ณ
ยฃ
GBP
๐ฌ๐ง
$
CAD
๐จ๐ฆ
$
AUD
๐ฆ๐บ
$
NZD
๐ณ๐ฟ
$
HKD
๐ญ๐ฐ
$
SGD
๐ธ๐ฌ
Global ranking
Ranking by countries
America
๐บ๐ธ United States
๐จ๐ฆ Canada
๐ฒ๐ฝ Mexico
๐ง๐ท Brazil
๐จ๐ฑ Chile
Europe
๐ช๐บ European Union
๐ฉ๐ช Germany
๐ฌ๐ง United Kingdom
๐ซ๐ท France
๐ช๐ธ Spain
๐ณ๐ฑ Netherlands
๐ธ๐ช Sweden
๐ฎ๐น Italy
๐จ๐ญ Switzerland
๐ต๐ฑ Poland
๐ซ๐ฎ Finland
Asia
๐จ๐ณ China
๐ฏ๐ต Japan
๐ฐ๐ท South Korea
๐ญ๐ฐ Hong Kong
๐ธ๐ฌ Singapore
๐ฎ๐ฉ Indonesia
๐ฎ๐ณ India
๐ฒ๐พ Malaysia
๐น๐ผ Taiwan
๐น๐ญ Thailand
๐ป๐ณ Vietnam
Others
๐ฆ๐บ Australia
๐ณ๐ฟ New Zealand
๐ฎ๐ฑ Israel
๐ธ๐ฆ Saudi Arabia
๐น๐ท Turkey
๐ท๐บ Russia
๐ฟ๐ฆ South Africa
>> All Countries
Ranking by categories
๐ All assets by Market Cap
๐ Automakers
โ๏ธ Airlines
๐ซ Airports
โ๏ธ Aircraft manufacturers
๐ฆ Banks
๐จ Hotels
๐ Pharmaceuticals
๐ E-Commerce
โ๏ธ Healthcare
๐ฆ Courier services
๐ฐ Media/Press
๐ท Alcoholic beverages
๐ฅค Beverages
๐ Clothing
โ๏ธ Mining
๐ Railways
๐ฆ Insurance
๐ Real estate
โ Ports
๐ผ Professional services
๐ด Food
๐ Restaurant chains
โ๐ป Software
๐ Semiconductors
๐ฌ Tobacco
๐ณ Financial services
๐ข Oil&Gas
๐ Electricity
๐งช Chemicals
๐ฐ Investment
๐ก Telecommunication
๐๏ธ Retail
๐ฅ๏ธ Internet
๐ Construction
๐ฎ Video Game
๐ป Tech
๐ฆพ AI
>> All Categories
ETFs
๐ All ETFs
๐๏ธ Bond ETFs
๏ผ Dividend ETFs
โฟ Bitcoin ETFs
โข Ethereum ETFs
๐ช Crypto Currency ETFs
๐ฅ Gold ETFs & ETCs
๐ฅ Silver ETFs & ETCs
๐ข๏ธ Oil ETFs & ETCs
๐ฝ Commodities ETFs & ETNs
๐ Emerging Markets ETFs
๐ Small-Cap ETFs
๐ Low volatility ETFs
๐ Inverse/Bear ETFs
โฌ๏ธ Leveraged ETFs
๐ Global/World ETFs
๐บ๐ธ USA ETFs
๐บ๐ธ S&P 500 ETFs
๐บ๐ธ Dow Jones ETFs
๐ช๐บ Europe ETFs
๐จ๐ณ China ETFs
๐ฏ๐ต Japan ETFs
๐ฎ๐ณ India ETFs
๐ฌ๐ง UK ETFs
๐ฉ๐ช Germany ETFs
๐ซ๐ท France ETFs
โ๏ธ Mining ETFs
โ๏ธ Gold Mining ETFs
โ๏ธ Silver Mining ETFs
๐งฌ Biotech ETFs
๐ฉโ๐ป Tech ETFs
๐ Real Estate ETFs
โ๏ธ Healthcare ETFs
โก Energy ETFs
๐ Renewable Energy ETFs
๐ก๏ธ Insurance ETFs
๐ฐ Water ETFs
๐ด Food & Beverage ETFs
๐ฑ Socially Responsible ETFs
๐ฃ๏ธ Infrastructure ETFs
๐ก Innovation ETFs
๐ Semiconductors ETFs
๐ Aerospace & Defense ETFs
๐ Cybersecurity ETFs
๐ฆพ Artificial Intelligence ETFs
Watchlist
Account
Valero Energy
VLO
#395
Rank
$60.30 B
Marketcap
๐บ๐ธ
United States
Country
$194.14
Share price
-1.06%
Change (1 day)
40.45%
Change (1 year)
๐ข Oil&Gas
โก Energy
Categories
Market cap
Revenue
Earnings
Price history
P/E ratio
P/S ratio
More
Price history
P/E ratio
P/S ratio
P/B ratio
Operating margin
EPS
Stock Splits
Dividends
Dividend yield
Shares outstanding
Fails to deliver
Cost to borrow
Total assets
Total liabilities
Total debt
Cash on Hand
Net Assets
Annual Reports (10-K)
Valero Energy
Quarterly Reports (10-Q)
Financial Year FY2017 Q2
Valero Energy - 10-Q quarterly report FY2017 Q2
Text size:
Small
Medium
Large
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
þ
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended
June 30, 2017
OR
o
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from _______________ to _______________
Commission File Number 1-13175
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
74-1828067
(State or other jurisdiction of
(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)
Identification No.)
One Valero Way
San Antonio, Texas
(Address of principal executive offices)
78249
(Zip Code)
(210) 345-2000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
þ
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
þ
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
þ
Accelerated filer
o
Non-accelerated filer
o
Smaller reporting company
o
Emerging growth company
o
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes
o
No
þ
The number of shares of the registrant’s only class of common stock, $0.01 par value, outstanding as of
July 31, 2017
was
441,663,968
.
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016
1
Consolidated Statements of Income
for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016
2
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016
3
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016
4
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
5
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
29
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
60
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
62
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
63
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
64
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
64
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
65
SIGNATURE
66
i
Table of Contents
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(millions of dollars, except par value)
June 30,
2017
December 31,
2016
(unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and temporary cash investments
$
5,207
$
4,816
Receivables, net
4,573
5,901
Inventories
5,674
5,709
Prepaid expenses and other
277
374
Total current assets
15,731
16,800
Property, plant, and equipment, at cost
38,979
37,733
Accumulated depreciation
(11,925
)
(11,261
)
Property, plant, and equipment, net
27,054
26,472
Deferred charges and other assets, net
3,189
2,901
Total assets
$
45,974
$
46,173
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Current portion of debt and capital lease obligations
$
121
$
115
Accounts payable
5,456
6,357
Accrued expenses
955
694
Taxes other than income taxes
1,076
1,084
Income taxes payable
75
78
Total current liabilities
7,683
8,328
Debt and capital lease obligations, less current portion
8,366
7,886
Deferred income taxes
7,254
7,361
Other long-term liabilities
1,906
1,744
Commitments and contingencies
Equity:
Valero Energy Corporation stockholders’ equity:
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 1,200,000,000 shares authorized;
673,501,593 and 673,501,593 shares issued
7
7
Additional paid-in capital
7,096
7,088
Treasury stock, at cost;
231,498,415 and 222,000,024 common shares
(12,660
)
(12,027
)
Retained earnings
26,603
26,366
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
(1,123
)
(1,410
)
Total Valero Energy Corporation stockholders’ equity
19,923
20,024
Noncontrolling interests
842
830
Total equity
20,765
20,854
Total liabilities and equity
$
45,974
$
46,173
See Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
1
Table of Contents
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(millions of dollars, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)
Three Months Ended
June 30,
Six Months Ended
June 30,
2017
2016
2017
2016
Operating revenues (a)
$
22,254
$
19,584
$
44,026
$
35,298
Costs and expenses:
Cost of sales (excluding the lower of cost or market inventory
valuation adjustment)
19,609
17,120
39,037
30,627
Lower of cost or market inventory valuation adjustment
—
(454
)
—
(747
)
Operating expenses
1,097
1,001
2,214
2,031
General and administrative expenses
178
159
368
315
Depreciation and amortization expense
499
471
999
956
Asset impairment loss
—
56
—
56
Total costs and expenses
21,383
18,353
42,618
33,238
Operating income
871
1,231
1,408
2,060
Other income, net
16
14
33
23
Interest and debt expense, net of capitalized interest
(119
)
(111
)
(240
)
(219
)
Income before income tax expense
768
1,134
1,201
1,864
Income tax expense
196
291
308
508
Net income
572
843
893
1,356
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
24
29
40
47
Net income attributable to Valero Energy Corporation stockholders
$
548
$
814
$
853
$
1,309
Earnings per common share
$
1.23
$
1.74
$
1.90
$
2.79
Weighted-average common shares outstanding (in millions)
444
467
446
468
Earnings per common share – assuming dilution
$
1.23
$
1.73
$
1.90
$
2.78
Weighted-average common shares outstanding –
assuming dilution (in millions)
446
470
448
471
Dividends per common share
$
0.70
$
0.60
$
1.40
$
1.20
_______________________________________________
Supplemental information:
(a) Includes excise taxes on sales by certain of our international
operations
$
1,384
$
1,470
$
2,656
$
2,865
See Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
2
Table of Contents
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(millions of dollars)
(unaudited)
Three Months Ended
June 30,
Six Months Ended
June 30,
2017
2016
2017
2016
Net income
$
572
$
843
$
893
$
1,356
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Foreign currency translation adjustment
208
(202
)
282
(80
)
Net gain on pension and other postretirement
benefits
4
3
7
6
Other comprehensive income (loss) before
income tax expense (benefit)
212
(199
)
289
(74
)
Income tax expense (benefit) related to
items of other comprehensive income (loss)
1
1
2
(6
)
Other comprehensive income (loss)
211
(200
)
287
(68
)
Comprehensive income
783
643
1,180
1,288
Less: Comprehensive income attributable
to noncontrolling interests
24
29
40
48
Comprehensive income attributable to
Valero Energy Corporation stockholders
$
759
$
614
$
1,140
$
1,240
See Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
Table of Contents
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(millions of dollars)
(unaudited)
Six Months Ended
June 30,
2017
2016
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income
$
893
$
1,356
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization expense
999
956
Lower of cost or market inventory valuation adjustment
—
(747
)
Asset impairment loss
—
56
Deferred income tax expense
24
195
Changes in current assets and current liabilities
859
1,130
Changes in deferred charges and credits and
other operating activities, net
10
13
Net cash provided by operating activities
2,785
2,959
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures
(572
)
(610
)
Deferred turnaround and catalyst costs
(308
)
(325
)
Investment in joint venture
(222
)
—
Acquisition of undivided interest in crude system assets
(72
)
—
Other investing activities, net
—
4
Net cash used in investing activities
(1,174
)
(931
)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from debt issuances or borrowings
—
197
Repayments of debt and capital lease obligations
(11
)
(24
)
Purchase of common stock for treasury
(660
)
(665
)
Common stock dividends
(627
)
(564
)
Proceeds from issuance of Valero Energy Partners LP common units
36
—
Distributions to noncontrolling interests
(public unitholders) of Valero Energy Partners LP
(18
)
(14
)
Distributions to other noncontrolling interests
(27
)
(33
)
Other financing activities, net
(21
)
(134
)
Net cash used in financing activities
(1,328
)
(1,237
)
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash
108
20
Net increase
in cash and temporary cash investments
391
811
Cash and temporary cash investments at beginning of period
4,816
4,114
Cash and temporary cash investments at end of period
$
5,207
$
4,925
See Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
Table of Contents
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1.
BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation
General
As used in this report, the terms “Valero,” “we,” “us,” or “our” may refer to Valero Energy Corporation, one or more of its consolidated subsidiaries, or all of them taken as a whole.
These unaudited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with United States (U.S.) generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by U.S.
GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature unless disclosed otherwise. Operating results for the
six
months ended
June 30, 2017
are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2017.
The balance sheet as of
December 31, 2016
has been derived from our audited financial statements as of that date. For further information, refer to our financial statements and notes thereto included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2016
.
Reclassifications
Effective January 1, 2017, we revised our reportable segments to reflect a new reportable segment — VLP. The results of the VLP segment include the results of Valero Energy Partners LP (VLP), our majority-owned master limited partnership. Our prior period segment information has been retrospectively adjusted to reflect our current segment presentation. See
Note 10
for additional information.
Certain amounts reported for the
six
months ended
June 30, 2016
have been reclassified to conform with the 2017 presentation.
Significant Accounting Policies
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S.
GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. On an ongoing basis, we review our estimates based on currently available information. Changes in facts and circumstances may result in revised estimates.
Accounting Pronouncements Adopted During the Period
In July 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2015-11, “Inventory (Topic 330),” to simplify the measurement of inventory measured using the first-in, first-out or average cost methods. The provisions of this ASU require the inventory to be measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value rather than the lower of cost or market. Net realizable value is defined as the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. The provisions of this ASU are to be applied prospectively and are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim reporting periods within those annual periods, with early adoption permitted. Our adoption of this ASU effective January 1,
5
Table of Contents
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
2017 did not affect our financial position or results of operations since the majority of our inventory is stated at last-in, first-out (LIFO).
In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-16, “Income Taxes (Topic 740),” to improve the accounting for the income tax consequences of intra-entity transfers of assets other than inventory. The provisions of this ASU require an entity to recognize the income tax consequences of intra-entity transfers of assets other than inventory immediately when the transfer occurs. These provisions are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim reporting periods within those annual periods, with early adoption permitted. The provisions should be applied on a modified retrospective basis with a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption to recognize the income tax consequences of intra-entity transfers of assets that occurred before the adoption date. Our early adoption of this ASU using the modified retrospective method effective January 1, 2017 did not have a material affect on our financial position or results of operations. Adoption of this guidance more accurately reflects the economics of an intra-entity asset transfer when it occurs by eliminating the previous exception that prohibited the recognition of the income tax consequences of an intra-entity asset transfer until the asset had been sold to an outside party.
In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-17, “Consolidation (Topic 810),” to provide guidance on how a reporting entity that is a single decision maker of a variable interest entity (VIE) should treat indirect interests in the entity held through related parties that are under common control with the reporting entity when determining whether it is the primary beneficiary. The provisions of this ASU are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim reporting periods within those annual periods, with early adoption permitted. The provisions should be applied on a retrospective basis to all relevant prior periods beginning with the fiscal year in which the VIE guidance was adopted with a cumulative-effect adjustment directly to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption. Our adoption of this ASU effective January 1, 2017 did not affect our financial position or results of operations.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, “Business Combinations (Topic 805),” to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. The provisions of this ASU provide a more robust framework to use in determining when a set of assets and activities is a business by clarifying the requirements related to inputs, processes, and outputs. These provisions are to be applied prospectively and are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. Our early adoption of this ASU effective January 1, 2017 did not have an effect on our financial position or results of operations. However, more of our future acquisitions may be accounted for as asset acquisitions.
Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606),” to clarify the principles for recognizing revenue. This new standard is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods within those annual periods. We recently completed our evaluation of the provisions of this standard and concluded that our adoption will not materially change the amount or timing of revenues recognized by us, nor will it materially affect our financial position. The majority of our revenues are generated from the sale of refined petroleum products and ethanol. These revenues are largely based on the current spot (market) prices of the products sold, which represents consideration specifically allocable to the products being sold on a given day, and we recognize
6
Table of Contents
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
those revenues upon delivery and transfer of title to the products to our customers. The time at which delivery and transfer of title occurs is the point when our control of the products is transferred to our customers and when our performance obligation to our customers is fulfilled. We will adopt this new standard effective January 1, 2018, and we expect to use the modified retrospective method of adoption as permitted by the standard. Under that method, the cumulative effect of initially applying the standard is recognized as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings, and revenues reported in the periods prior to the date of adoption are not changed. During 2017, we are developing our revenue disclosures and enhancing our accounting systems.
In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, “Financial Instruments—Overall (Subtopic 825-10),” to enhance the reporting model for financial instruments regarding certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure. The provisions of this ASU are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim reporting periods within those annual periods. This ASU is to be applied using a cumulative-effect adjustment to the balance sheet as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. The adoption of this ASU effective January 1, 2018 will not affect our financial position or results of operations, but will result in revised disclosures.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842),” to increase the transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. The new standard is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim reporting periods within those annual periods, with early adoption permitted. We will adopt this new standard on January 1, 2019 and we expect to use the modified retrospective method of adoption as permitted by the standard. We are developing enhanced contracting and lease evaluation processes and information systems to support such processes, as well as new and enhanced accounting systems to account for our leases and support the required disclosures. We continue to evaluate the effect that adopting this standard will have on our financial statements and related disclosures.
In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-07, “Compensation—Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost.” The provisions of this ASU require that an employer report the service cost component in the same line item as other compensation costs arising from services rendered by the pertinent employees during the period. It also requires the other components of net periodic pension cost and net periodic postretirement benefit cost to be presented in the income statement separately from the service cost component and outside a subtotal of income from operations. This ASU is to be applied retrospectively for income statement items and prospectively for any capitalized benefit costs. The provisions of this ASU are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim reporting periods within those annual periods, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of this ASU effective January 1, 2018 is not expected to materially affect our financial position or results of operations.
In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, “Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718),” to reduce diversity in practice, as well as reduce cost and complexity regarding a change to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award. The provisions of this ASU are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim reporting periods within those annual periods, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of this ASU effective January 1, 2018 will not have an immediate effect on our
7
Table of Contents
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
financial position or results of operations as it will be applied prospectively to an award modified on or after adoption.
2.
ARUBA DISPOSITION
Prior to the Aruba Disposition discussed below, we recognized an asset impairment loss of
$56 million
in June 2016 representing all of the remaining carrying value of our long-lived assets in Aruba. These assets were primarily related to our crude oil and refined petroleum products terminal and transshipment facility in Aruba (collectively, the Aruba Terminal), which were included in our refining segment. We recognized the impairment loss at that time because we concluded that it was more likely than not that we would ultimately transfer ownership of these assets to the Government of Aruba (GOA) as a result of agreements entered into in June 2016 between the GOA, CITGO Aruba Refining N.V. (CAR), and CITGO Petroleum Corporation (together with CAR and certain other affiliates, collectively, CITGO) providing for, among other things, the GOA’s lease of those assets to CITGO. (See
Note 12
for disclosure related to the method to determine fair value.)
Effective October 1, 2016, we (i) transferred ownership of all of our assets in Aruba, other than certain hydrocarbon inventories and working capital, to Refineria di Aruba N.V., an entity wholly-owned by the GOA, (ii) settled our obligations under various agreements with the GOA, including agreements that required us to dismantle our leasehold improvements under certain conditions, and (iii) sold the working capital of our Aruba operations, including hydrocarbon inventories, to the GOA and CITGO. We refer to this transaction as the “Aruba Disposition.” The agreements associated with the Aruba Disposition were finalized in September 2016, including approval of such agreements by the Aruba Parliament. We no longer own any assets or have any operations in Aruba.
3.
INVENTORIES
Inventories consisted of the following (in millions):
June 30,
2017
December 31,
2016
Refinery feedstocks
$
2,254
$
2,068
Refined petroleum products and blendstocks
2,941
3,153
Ethanol feedstocks and products
227
238
Materials and supplies
252
250
Inventories
$
5,674
$
5,709
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market. As of
December 31, 2015
, we had a valuation reserve of
$766 million
in order to state our inventories at market. We recorded a change in our lower of cost or market inventory valuation reserve that resulted in a net
benefit to our results of operations of
$454 million
and
$747 million
for the three and
six
months ended
June 30, 2016
, respectively.
As of
June 30, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
, the replacement cost (market value) of LIFO inventories exceeded their LIFO carrying amounts by
$1.1 billion
and
$1.9 billion
, respectively. As of
June 30, 2017
8
Table of Contents
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
and
December 31, 2016
, our non-LIFO inventories accounted for
$421 million
and
$641 million
, respectively, of our total inventories.
4.
DEBT AND CAPITAL LEASE OBLIGATIONS
Debt
There was no significant activity related to our debt during the six months ended
June 30, 2017
.
During the six months ended June 30, 2016, the following activity occurred related to our debt:
•
VLP borrowed
$139 million
under its
$750 million
senior unsecured revolving credit facility (the VLP Revolver) in connection with VLP’s acquisition from us of the McKee Terminal Services Business in
April 2016
, and
•
one of our consolidated joint ventures entered into a
C$72 million
senior secured credit facility.
We had outstanding borrowings, letters of credit issued, and availability under our credit facilities as follows (in millions):
June 30, 2017
Facility
Amount
Maturity Date
Outstanding
Borrowings
Letters of
Credit Issued
Availability
Committed facilities:
Valero Revolver
$
3,000
November 2020
$
—
$
150
$
2,850
VLP Revolver
$
750
November 2020
$
30
$
—
$
720
Canadian Revolver
C$
25
November 2017
C$
—
C$
10
C$
15
Accounts receivable
sales facility (a)
$
1,300
July 2017
$
100
n/a
$
999
Letter of credit facility
$
100
November 2017
n/a
$
—
$
100
Uncommitted facilities:
Letter of credit facilities
n/a
n/a
n/a
$
202
n/a
___________________
(a)
As of June 30, 2017, the actual availability under the accounts receivable sales facility fell below the facility borrowing capacity to
$1.1 billion
due to a decrease in eligible trade receivables. In July 2017, we amended this facility to extend the maturity date from
July 2017
to
July 2018
.
In
June 2017
, one of our committed letter of credit facilities with a borrowing capacity of
$125 million
expired and was not renewed.
As of
June 30, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
, the weighted-average interest rate on the VLP Revolver was
2.5625
percent and
2.3125
percent, respectively. As of
June 30, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
, the weighted-average interest rate on the accounts receivable sales facility was
1.7249
percent and
1.3422
percent, respectively.
9
Table of Contents
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Other Disclosures
Interest and debt expense, net of capitalized interest is comprised of the following (in millions):
Three Months Ended
June 30,
Six Months Ended
June 30,
2017
2016
2017
2016
Interest and debt expense
$
134
$
130
$
268
$
258
Less capitalized interest
15
19
28
39
Interest and debt expense, net of
capitalized interest
$
119
$
111
$
240
$
219
Capital Leases
In January 2017, we recognized capital lease assets and related obligations totaling approximately
$490 million
for the lease of storage tanks located at three of our refineries. These lease agreements have initial terms of
10
years each with successive
10
-year automatic renewals.
5.
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Environmental Matters
We are involved, together with several other companies, in an environmental cleanup in the Village of Hartford, Illinois (the Village) and during 2015, one of these companies assumed the ongoing remediation in the Village pursuant to a federal court order. We had previously conducted an initial response in the Village, along with other companies, pursuant to an administrative order issued by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The parties involved in the initial response may have further claims among themselves for costs already incurred. We also continue to be engaged in site assessment and interim measures at the adjacent shutdown refinery site, which we acquired as part of an acquisition in 2005, and we are in litigation with other potentially responsible parties and the Illinois EPA relating to the remediation of the site. In each of these matters, we have various defenses, limitations, and potential rights for contribution from the other responsible parties. We have recorded a liability for our expected contribution obligations. However, because of the unpredictable nature of these cleanups, the methodology for allocation of liabilities, and the State of Illinois’ failure to directly sue third parties responsible for historic contamination at the site, it is reasonably possible that we could incur a loss in a range of
$0
to
$200 million
in excess of the amount of our accrual to ultimately resolve these matters. Factors underlying this estimated range are expected to change from time to time, and actual results may vary significantly from this estimate.
Litigation Matters
We are party to claims and legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. We have not recorded a loss contingency liability with respect to some of these matters because we have determined that it is remote that a loss has been incurred. For other matters, we have recorded a loss contingency liability where we have determined that it is probable that a loss has been incurred and that the loss is reasonably estimable. These loss contingency liabilities are not material to our financial position. We re-evaluate and update our loss contingency liabilities as matters progress over time, and we believe that any changes to the recorded liabilities will not be material to our financial position, results of operations, or liquidity.
10
Table of Contents
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
6.
EQUITY
Reconciliation of Balances
The following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of equity attributable to our stockholders, equity attributable to noncontrolling interests, and total equity (in millions):
Six Months Ended June 30,
2017
2016
Valero
Stockholders’
Equity
Non-
controlling
Interests (a)
Total
Equity
Valero
Stockholders’
Equity
Non-
controlling
Interests (a)
Total
Equity
Balance as of
beginning of period
$
20,024
$
830
$
20,854
$
20,527
$
827
$
21,354
Net income
853
40
893
1,309
47
1,356
Dividends
(627
)
—
(627
)
(564
)
—
(564
)
Stock-based
compensation expense
25
—
25
23
—
23
Stock purchases
in connection with
stock-based
compensation plans
(13
)
—
(13
)
(43
)
—
(43
)
Stock purchases under
purchase program
(649
)
—
(649
)
(610
)
—
(610
)
Distributions to
noncontrolling interests
—
(45
)
(45
)
—
(47
)
(47
)
Other
23
17
40
3
—
3
Other comprehensive
income (loss)
287
—
287
(69
)
1
(68
)
Balance as of end of period
$
19,923
$
842
$
20,765
$
20,576
$
828
$
21,404
___________________
(a)
The noncontrolling interests relate to third-party ownership interests in VIEs for which we are the primary beneficiary and therefore consolidate. See
Note 7
for information about our consolidated VIEs.
Share Activity
There was no significant share activity during the
six
months ended
June 30, 2017
and
2016
.
Common Stock Dividends
On
July 20, 2017
, our board of directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of
$0.70
per common share payable on
September 7, 2017
to holders of record at the close of business on
August 9, 2017
.
11
Table of Contents
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
Changes in accumulated other comprehensive loss by component, net of tax, were as follows (in millions):
Six Months Ended June 30,
2017
2016
Foreign
Currency
Translation
Adjustment
Defined
Benefit
Plans
Items
Total
Foreign
Currency
Translation
Adjustment
Defined
Benefit
Plans
Items
Total
Balance as of
beginning of period
$
(1,021
)
$
(389
)
$
(1,410
)
$
(605
)
$
(328
)
$
(933
)
Other comprehensive income (loss)
before reclassifications
282
—
282
(81
)
8
(73
)
Amounts reclassified from
accumulated other
comprehensive loss
—
5
5
—
4
4
Net other comprehensive income (loss)
282
5
287
(81
)
12
(69
)
Balance as of end of period
$
(739
)
$
(384
)
$
(1,123
)
$
(686
)
$
(316
)
$
(1,002
)
7.
VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES
Overview
In the normal course of business, we have financial interests in certain entities that have been determined to be VIEs. We consolidate a VIE when we have a variable interest in an entity for which we are the primary beneficiary such that we have (a) the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance and (b) the obligation to absorb losses of or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. In order to make this determination, we evaluated our contractual arrangements with the VIEs, including arrangements for the use of assets, purchases of products and services, debt, equity, or management of operating activities.
Our significant VIE’s include:
•
VLP, a publicly traded master limited partnership formed to own, operate, develop, and acquire crude oil and refined petroleum products pipelines, terminals, and other transportation and logistics assets; and
•
Diamond Green Diesel Holdings LLC (DGD), a joint venture formed to construct and operate a biodiesel plant that processes animal fats, used cooking oils, and other vegetable oils into renewable green diesel.
The VIEs’ assets can only be used to settle their own obligations and the VIEs’ creditors have no recourse to our assets. We do not provide financial guarantees to our VIEs. Although we have provided credit facilities to the VIEs in support of their construction or acquisition activities, these transactions are eliminated in consolidation. Our financial position, results of operations, and cash flows are impacted by our consolidated VIEs’ performance, net of intercompany eliminations, to the extent of our ownership interest in each VIE.
12
Table of Contents
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following tables present summarized balance sheet information for the significant assets and liabilities of our VIEs, which are included in our balance sheets (in millions).
June 30, 2017
VLP
DGD
Other
Total
Assets
Cash and temporary cash investments
$
88
$
155
$
12
$
255
Other current assets
1
55
—
56
Property, plant, and equipment, net
945
371
130
1,446
Liabilities
Current liabilities
$
14
$
17
$
6
$
37
Debt and capital lease obligations,
less current portion
525
—
45
570
December 31, 2016
VLP
DGD
Other
Total
Assets
Cash and temporary cash investments
$
71
$
167
$
15
$
253
Other current assets
3
87
—
90
Property, plant, and equipment, net
865
355
133
1,353
Liabilities
Current liabilities
$
15
$
17
$
7
$
39
Debt and capital lease obligations,
less current portion
525
—
46
571
13
Table of Contents
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
8.
EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
The components of net periodic benefit cost related to our defined benefit plans were as follows (in millions):
Pension Plans
Other Postretirement
Benefit Plans
2017
2016
2017
2016
Three months ended June 30:
Service cost
$
30
$
28
$
2
$
1
Interest cost
22
21
2
3
Expected return on plan assets
(38
)
(34
)
—
—
Amortization of:
Net actuarial (gain) loss
14
12
(1
)
—
Prior service credit
(5
)
(5
)
(4
)
(4
)
Net periodic benefit cost (credit)
$
23
$
22
$
(1
)
$
—
Six months ended June 30:
Service cost
$
61
$
56
$
3
$
3
Interest cost
43
42
5
6
Expected return on plan assets
(75
)
(69
)
—
—
Amortization of:
Net actuarial (gain)
loss
27
24
(2
)
—
Prior service credit
(10
)
(10
)
(8
)
(8
)
Net periodic benefit cost (credit)
$
46
$
43
$
(2
)
$
1
We contributed
$14 million
and
$14 million
, respectively, to our pension plans and
$13 million
and
$8 million
, respectively, to our other postretirement benefit plans during the
six
months ended
June 30, 2017
and
2016
.
Management has elected to increase the discretionary contributions to our pension plans by
$80 million
in the third quarter of 2017, resulting in expected contributions to our pension plans of
$108 million
for 2017. Our anticipated contributions to our other postretirement benefit plans during 2017 have not changed from the amount previously disclosed in our financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2016
.
14
Table of Contents
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
9.
EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
Earnings per common share were computed as follows (dollars and shares in millions, except per share amounts):
Three Months Ended June 30,
2017
2016
Participating
Securities
Common
Stock
Participating
Securities
Common
Stock
Earnings per common share:
Net income attributable to Valero stockholders
$
548
$
814
Less dividends paid:
Common stock
311
281
Participating securities
1
1
Undistributed earnings
$
236
$
532
Weighted-average common shares outstanding
2
444
1
467
Earnings per common share:
Distributed earnings
$
0.70
$
0.70
$
0.60
$
0.60
Undistributed earnings
0.53
0.53
1.14
1.14
Total earnings per common share
$
1.23
$
1.23
$
1.74
$
1.74
Earnings per common share –
assuming dilution:
Net income attributable to Valero stockholders
$
548
$
814
Weighted-average common shares outstanding
444
467
Common equivalent shares
2
3
Weighted-average common shares outstanding –
assuming dilution
446
470
Earnings per common share – assuming dilution
$
1.23
$
1.73
15
Table of Contents
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Six Months Ended June 30,
2017
2016
Participating
Securities
Common
Stock
Participating
Securities
Common
Stock
Earnings per common share:
Net income attributable to Valero stockholders
$
853
$
1,309
Less dividends paid:
Common stock
625
562
Participating securities
2
2
Undistributed earnings
$
226
$
745
Weighted-average common shares outstanding
2
446
1
468
Earnings per common share:
Distributed earnings
$
1.40
$
1.40
$
1.20
$
1.20
Undistributed earnings
0.50
0.50
1.59
1.59
Total earnings per common share
$
1.90
$
1.90
$
2.79
$
2.79
Earnings per common share –
assuming dilution:
Net income attributable to Valero stockholders
$
853
$
1,309
Weighted-average common shares outstanding
446
468
Common equivalent shares
2
3
Weighted-average common shares outstanding –
assuming dilution
448
471
Earnings per common share – assuming dilution
$
1.90
$
2.78
Participating securities include restricted stock and performance awards granted under our 2011 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan.
16
Table of Contents
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
10.
SEGMENT INFORMATION
Effective January 1, 2017, we revised our reportable segments to align with certain changes in how our chief operating decision maker manages and allocates resources to our business. Accordingly, we created a new reportable segment — VLP. The results of the VLP segment, which include the results of our majority-owned master limited partnership referred to by the same name, were transferred from the refining segment. Our prior period segment information has been retrospectively adjusted to reflect our current segment presentation.
As a result, we have
three
reportable segments as follows:
•
Refining segment
includes our refining operations, the associated marketing activities, and certain logistics assets that support our refining operations that are not owned by VLP;
•
Ethanol segment
includes our ethanol operations, the associated marketing activities, and logistics assets that support our ethanol operations; and
•
VLP segment
includes the results of VLP, which provides transportation and terminaling services in support of our refining segment.
Operations that are not included in any of the reportable segments are included in the corporate category.
Our reportable segments are strategic business units that offer different products and services. They are managed separately as each business requires unique technologies and marketing strategies. Performance is evaluated based on segment operating income, which includes revenues and expenses that are directly attributable to the management of the respective segment. Intersegment sales are generally derived from transactions made at prevailing market rates.
17
Table of Contents
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table reflects activity related to our reportable segments (in millions):
Refining
Ethanol
VLP
Corporate
and
Eliminations
Total
Three months ended June 30, 2017:
Operating revenues:
Operating revenues from external customers
$
21,415
$
839
$
—
$
—
$
22,254
Intersegment revenues
—
28
110
(138
)
—
Total operating revenues
21,415
867
110
(138
)
22,254
Costs and expenses:
Cost of sales:
Cost of sales from external customers
18,899
710
—
—
19,609
Intersegment cost of sales
138
—
—
(138
)
—
Total cost of sales
19,037
710
—
(138
)
19,609
Operating expenses
965
107
27
(2
)
1,097
General and administrative expenses
—
—
—
178
178
Depreciation and amortization expense
454
19
12
14
499
Total costs and expenses
20,456
836
39
52
21,383
Operating income (loss)
$
959
$
31
$
71
$
(190
)
$
871
Three months ended June 30, 2016:
Operating revenues:
Operating revenues from external customers
$
18,664
$
920
$
—
$
—
$
19,584
Intersegment revenues
—
45
87
(132
)
—
Total operating revenues
18,664
965
87
(132
)
19,584
Costs and expenses:
Cost of sales (excluding the lower of cost or
market inventory valuation adjustment):
Cost of sales from external customers
16,322
798
—
—
17,120
Intersegment cost of sales
132
—
—
(132
)
—
Total cost of sales (excluding the lower
of cost or market inventory
valuation adjustment)
16,454
798
—
(132
)
17,120
Lower of cost or market inventory
valuation adjustment
(434
)
(20
)
—
—
(454
)
Operating expenses (a)
878
99
24
—
1,001
General and administrative expenses
—
—
—
159
159
Depreciation and amortization expense (a)
430
19
11
11
471
Asset impairment loss
56
—
—
—
56
Total costs and expenses
17,384
896
35
38
18,353
Operating income (loss)
$
1,280
$
69
$
52
$
(170
)
$
1,231
___________________
(a)
The VLP segment information for the three months ended
June 30, 2016
has been retrospectively adjusted for VLP’s acquisitions that occurred subsequent to
June 30, 2016
.
18
Table of Contents
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Refining
Ethanol
VLP
Corporate
and
Eliminations
Total
Six months ended June 30, 2017:
Operating revenues:
Operating revenues from external customers
$
42,302
$
1,724
$
—
$
—
$
44,026
Intersegment revenues
—
88
216
(304
)
—
Total operating revenues
42,302
1,812
216
(304
)
44,026
Costs and expenses:
Cost of sales:
Cost of sales from external customers
37,540
1,497
—
—
39,037
Intersegment cost of sales
304
—
—
(304
)
—
Total cost of sales
37,844
1,497
—
(304
)
39,037
Operating expenses
1,949
216
51
(2
)
2,214
General and administrative expenses
—
—
—
368
368
Depreciation and amortization expense
903
46
24
26
999
Total costs and expenses
40,696
1,759
75
88
42,618
Operating income (loss)
$
1,606
$
53
$
141
$
(392
)
$
1,408
Six months ended June 30, 2016:
Operating revenues:
Operating revenues from external customers
$
33,584
$
1,714
$
—
$
—
$
35,298
Intersegment revenues
—
79
166
(245
)
—
Total operating revenues
33,584
1,793
166
(245
)
35,298
Costs and expenses:
Cost of sales (excluding the lower of cost or
market inventory valuation adjustment):
Cost of sales from external customers
29,121
1,506
—
—
30,627
Intersegment cost of sales
245
—
—
(245
)
—
Total cost of sales (excluding the lower
of cost or market inventory
valuation adjustment)
29,366
1,506
—
(245
)
30,627
Lower of cost or market inventory
valuation adjustment
(697
)
(50
)
—
—
(747
)
Operating expenses (a)
1,785
198
48
—
2,031
General and administrative expenses
—
—
—
315
315
Depreciation and amortization expense (a)
879
31
23
23
956
Asset impairment loss
56
—
—
—
56
Total costs and expenses
31,389
1,685
71
93
33,238
Operating income (loss)
$
2,195
$
108
$
95
$
(338
)
$
2,060
___________________
(a)
The VLP segment information for the
six
months ended
June 30, 2016
has been retrospectively adjusted for VLP’s acquisitions that occurred subsequent to
June 30, 2016
.
19
Table of Contents
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Total assets by reportable segment were as follows (in millions):
June 30,
2017
December 31,
2016
Refining
$
37,401
$
38,095
Ethanol
1,314
1,316
VLP
1,072
972
Corporate
6,187
5,790
Total assets
$
45,974
$
46,173
11.
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION
In order to determine net cash provided by operating activities, net income is adjusted by, among other things, changes in current assets and current liabilities as follows (in millions):
Six Months Ended
June 30,
2017
2016
Decrease (increase) in current assets:
Receivables, net
$
1,396
$
(467
)
Inventories
123
422
Income taxes receivable
45
169
Prepaid expenses and other
41
14
Increase (decrease) in current liabilities:
Accounts payable
(942
)
1,090
Accrued expenses
262
(113
)
Taxes other than income taxes
(41
)
7
Income taxes payable
(25
)
8
Changes in current assets and current liabilities
$
859
$
1,130
Noncash investing and financing activities during the
six
months ended
June 30, 2017
included the recognition of a capital lease asset and related obligation associated with an agreement for storage tanks near three of our refineries. This noncash transaction is further described in
Note 4
. There were no significant noncash investing or financing activities during the
six
months ended
June 30, 2016
.
Cash flows reflected as “other financing activities, net” for the six months ended
June 30, 2016
included the payment of a long-term liability of
$137 million
owed to a joint venture partner associated with an owner-method joint venture investment.
20
Table of Contents
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Cash flows related to interest and income taxes were as follows (in millions):
Six Months Ended
June 30,
2017
2016
Interest paid in excess of amount capitalized
$
235
$
213
Income taxes paid, net
263
137
12.
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Recurring Fair Value Measurements
The tables below present information (in millions) about our assets and liabilities recognized at their fair values in our balance sheets categorized according to the fair value hierarchy of the inputs utilized by us to determine the fair values as of
June 30, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
.
We have elected to offset the fair value amounts recognized for multiple similar derivative contracts executed with the same counterparty, including any related cash collateral assets or obligations as shown below; however, fair value amounts by hierarchy level are presented in the tables below on a gross basis. We have no derivative contracts that are subject to master netting arrangements that are reflected gross on the balance sheet.
June 30, 2017
Total
Gross
Fair
Value
Effect of
Counter-
party
Netting
Effect of
Cash
Collateral
Netting
Net
Carrying
Value on
Balance
Sheet
Cash
Collateral
Paid or
Received
Not Offset
Fair Value Hierarchy
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Assets:
Commodity derivative
contracts
$
650
$
12
$
—
$
662
$
(612
)
$
(5
)
$
45
$
—
Investments of certain
benefit plans
59
—
11
70
n/a
n/a
70
n/a
Total
$
709
$
12
$
11
$
732
$
(612
)
$
(5
)
$
115
Liabilities:
Commodity derivative
contracts
$
605
$
14
$
—
$
619
$
(612
)
$
(7
)
$
—
$
(68
)
Environmental credit
obligations
—
274
—
274
n/a
n/a
274
n/a
Physical purchase
contracts
—
4
—
4
n/a
n/a
4
n/a
Foreign currency
contracts
10
—
—
10
n/a
n/a
10
n/a
Total
$
615
$
292
$
—
$
907
$
(612
)
$
(7
)
$
288
21
Table of Contents
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2016
Total
Gross
Fair
Value
Effect of
Counter-
party
Netting
Effect of
Cash
Collateral
Netting
Net
Carrying
Value on
Balance
Sheet
Cash
Collateral
Paid or
Received
Not Offset
Fair Value Hierarchy
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Assets:
Commodity derivative
contracts
$
874
$
38
$
—
$
912
$
(875
)
$
—
$
37
$
—
Foreign currency
contracts
3
—
—
3
n/a
n/a
3
n/a
Investments of certain
benefit plans
58
—
11
69
n/a
n/a
69
n/a
Total
$
935
$
38
$
11
$
984
$
(875
)
$
—
$
109
Liabilities:
Commodity derivative
contracts
$
872
$
23
$
—
$
895
$
(875
)
$
(20
)
$
—
$
(88
)
Environmental credit
obligations
—
188
—
188
n/a
n/a
188
n/a
Physical purchase
contracts
—
5
—
5
n/a
n/a
5
n/a
Total
$
872
$
216
$
—
$
1,088
$
(875
)
$
(20
)
$
193
A description of our assets and liabilities recognized at fair value along with the valuation methods and inputs we used to develop their fair value measurements are as follows:
•
Commodity derivative contracts consist primarily of exchange-traded futures and swaps, and as disclosed in
Note 13
, some of these contracts are designated as hedging instruments. These contracts are measured at fair value using the market approach. Exchange-traded futures are valued based on quoted prices from the exchange and are categorized in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. Swaps are priced using third-party broker quotes, industry pricing services, and exchange-traded curves, with appropriate consideration of counterparty credit risk, but because they have contractual terms that are not identical to exchange-traded futures instruments with a comparable market price, these financial instruments are categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
•
Physical purchase contracts represent the fair value of fixed-price corn purchase contracts. The fair values of these purchase contracts are measured using a market approach based on quoted prices from the commodity exchange or an independent pricing service and are categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
•
Investments of certain benefit plans consist of investment securities held by trusts for the purpose of satisfying a portion of our obligations under certain U.S. nonqualified benefit plans. The assets categorized in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy are measured at fair value using a market approach based on quoted prices from national securities exchanges. The assets categorized in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy represent insurance contracts, the fair value of which is provided by the insurer.
22
Table of Contents
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
•
Foreign currency contracts consist of foreign currency exchange and purchase contracts entered into for our international operations to manage our exposure to exchange rate fluctuations on transactions denominated in currencies other than the local (functional) currencies of those operations. These contracts are valued based on quoted prices from the exchange and are categorized in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.
•
Environmental credit obligations represent our liability for the purchase of (i) biofuel credits (primarily Renewable Identification Numbers (RINs) in the U.S.) needed to satisfy our obligation to blend biofuels into the products we produce and (ii) emission credits under the
California Global Warming Solutions Act
(the California cap-and-trade system, also known as AB 32), Quebec’s
Environmental Quality Act
(the Quebec cap-and-trade system), and Ontario’s
Climate Change Mitigation and Low-Carbon Economy Act
(the Ontario cap-and-trade system), (collectively, the cap-and-trade systems). To the degree we are unable to blend biofuels (such as ethanol and biodiesel) at percentages required under the biofuel programs, we must purchase biofuel credits to comply with these programs. Under the cap-and-trade systems, we must purchase emission credits to comply with these systems. These programs are further described in
Note 13
under “Environmental Compliance Program Price Risk.” The liability for environmental credits is based on our deficit for such credits as of the balance sheet date, if any, after considering any credits acquired or under contract, and is equal to the product of the credits deficit and the market price of these credits as of the balance sheet date. The environmental credit obligations are categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy and are measured at fair value using the market approach based on quoted prices from an independent pricing service.
There were no transfers between levels for assets and liabilities held as of
June 30, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
that were measured at fair value on a recurring basis.
There was
no
activity during the three and
six
months ended
June 30, 2017
and
2016
related to the fair value amounts categorized in Level 3 as of
June 30, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
.
Nonrecurring Fair Value Measurements
As discussed in
Note 2
, we concluded that the Aruba Terminal was impaired as of June 30, 2016, which resulted in an asset impairment loss of
$56 million
that was recorded in June 2016. The fair value of the Aruba Terminal was determined using an income approach and was classified in Level 3. We employed a probability-weighted approach to possible future cash flow scenarios, including transferring ownership of the business to the GOA or continuing to operate.
There were
no
assets or liabilities that were measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of
June 30, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
.
23
Table of Contents
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Other Financial Instruments
Financial instruments that we recognize in our balance sheets at their carrying amounts are shown in the table below along with their associated fair values (in millions):
June 30, 2017
December 31, 2016
Carrying
Amount
Fair
Value
Carrying
Amount
Fair
Value
Financial assets:
Cash and temporary cash investments
$
5,207
$
5,207
$
4,816
$
4,816
Financial liabilities:
Debt (excluding capital leases)
7,928
9,129
7,926
8,882
The methods and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value of these financial instruments are as follows:
•
The fair value of cash and temporary cash investments approximates the carrying value due to the low level of credit risk of these assets combined with their short maturities and market interest rates (Level 1).
•
The fair value of debt is determined primarily using the market approach based on quoted prices provided by third-party brokers and vendor pricing services (Level 2).
13.
PRICE RISK MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
We are exposed to market risks primarily related to the volatility in the price of commodities, and foreign currency exchange rates, and the price of credits needed to comply with various government and regulatory programs. We enter into derivative instruments to manage some of these risks, including derivative instruments related to the various commodities we purchase or produce, and foreign currency exchange and purchase contracts, as described below under
“Risk Management Activities by Type of Risk.”
These derivative instruments are recorded as either assets or liabilities measured at their fair values (see
Note 12
), as summarized below under
“Fair Values of Derivative Instruments,”
with changes in fair value recognized currently in income. The effect of these derivative instruments on our income is summarized below under
“Effect of Derivative Instruments on Income.”
Risk Management Activities by Type of Risk
Commodity Price Risk
We are exposed to market risks related to the volatility in the price of crude oil, refined petroleum products (primarily gasoline and distillate), grain (primarily corn), soybean oil, and natural gas used in our operations. To reduce the impact of price volatility on our results of operations and cash flows, we use commodity derivative instruments, including futures, swaps, and options. We use the futures markets for the available liquidity, which provides greater flexibility in transacting our hedging and trading operations. We use swaps primarily to manage our price exposure. Our positions in commodity derivative instruments are monitored and managed on a daily basis by our risk control group to ensure compliance with our stated risk management policy that has been approved by our board of directors.
24
Table of Contents
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
To manage commodity price risk, we use economic hedges, which are not designated as fair value or cash flow hedges, and we use fair value and cash flow hedges from time to time. We also enter into certain commodity derivative instruments for trading purposes. Our objectives for entering into hedges or trading derivatives are described below.
•
Economic Hedges
– Economic hedges represent commodity derivative instruments that are used to manage price volatility in certain (i) feedstock and refined petroleum product inventories, (ii) fixed-price purchase contracts, and (iii) forecasted feedstock, refined petroleum product or natural gas purchases and refined petroleum product sales. The objectives of our economic hedges are to hedge price volatility in certain feedstock and refined petroleum product inventories and to lock in the price of forecasted feedstock, refined petroleum product, or natural gas purchases or refined petroleum product sales at existing market prices that we deem favorable. Economic hedges are not designated as fair value or cash flow hedges for accounting purposes, usually due to the difficulty of establishing the required documentation at the date the derivative instrument is entered into for them to qualify as hedging instruments for accounting purposes.
As of
June 30, 2017
, we had the following outstanding commodity derivative instruments that were used as economic hedges, as well as commodity derivative instruments related to the physical purchase of corn at a fixed price. The information presents the notional volume of outstanding contracts by type of instrument and year of maturity (volumes in thousands of barrels, except those identified as corn contracts that are presented in thousands of bushels and soybean oil contracts that are presented in thousands of pounds).
Notional Contract Volumes by
Year of Maturity
Derivative Instrument
2017
2018
Crude oil and refined petroleum products:
Swaps – long
14,194
—
Swaps – short
14,479
—
Futures – long
69,198
7,005
Futures – short
72,906
6,982
Corn:
Futures – long
35,610
5
Futures – short
64,260
4,545
Physical contracts – long
28,720
4,573
Soybean oil:
Futures – long
168,178
—
Futures – short
246,957
—
25
Table of Contents
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
•
Trading Derivatives
– Our objective for entering into commodity derivative instruments for trading purposes is to take advantage of existing market conditions for crude oil and refined petroleum products.
As of
June 30, 2017
, we had the following outstanding commodity derivative instruments that were entered into for trading purposes. The information presents the notional volume of outstanding contracts by type of instrument and year of maturity (volumes represent thousands of barrels, except those identified as natural gas contracts that are presented in billions of British thermal units and corn contracts that are presented in thousands of bushels).
Notional Contract Volumes by
Year of Maturity
Derivative Instrument
2017
2018
Crude oil and refined
petroleum
products:
Swaps – long
2,070
—
Swaps – short
2,070
—
Futures – long
53,842
20,816
Futures – short
52,419
21,091
Options – long
75,375
102,300
Options – short
75,577
102,300
Natural gas:
Futures – long
2,500
—
Futures – short
1,750
—
Corn:
Futures – long
2,500
—
Futures – short
2,500
—
We had no commodity derivative contracts outstanding as of
June 30, 2017
and
2016
or during the
six
months ended
June 30, 2017
and
2016
that were designated as fair value or cash flow hedges.
Foreign Currency Risk
We are exposed to exchange rate fluctuations on transactions entered into by our international operations that are denominated in currencies other than the local (functional) currencies of those operations. To manage our exposure to these exchange rate fluctuations, we use foreign currency exchange and purchase contracts. These contracts are not designated as hedging instruments for accounting purposes and therefore are classified as economic hedges. As of
June 30, 2017
, we had forward contracts to purchase
$424 million
of U.S. dollars. These commitments matured on or before
July 31, 2017
.
Environmental Compliance Program Price Risk
We are exposed to market risk related to the volatility in the price of credits needed to comply with various governmental and regulatory environmental compliance programs. To manage this risk, we enter into contracts to purchase these credits when prices are deemed favorable. Some of these contracts are derivative instruments; however, we elect the normal purchase exception and do not record these contracts at their fair values. Certain of these programs require us to blend biofuels into the products we produce, and we are
26
Table of Contents
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
subject to such programs in most of the countries in which we operate. These countries set annual quotas for the percentage of biofuels that must be blended into the motor fuels consumed in these countries. As a producer of motor fuels from petroleum, we are obligated to blend biofuels into the products we produce at a rate that is at least equal to the applicable quota. To the degree we are unable to blend at the applicable rate, we must purchase biofuel credits (primarily RINs in the U.S.). We are exposed to the volatility in the market price of these credits, and we manage that risk by purchasing biofuel credits when prices are deemed favorable. The cost of meeting our obligations under these compliance programs was
$255 million
and
$173 million
for the three months ended
June 30, 2017
and
2016
, respectively, and
$401 million
and
$334 million
for the
six
months ended
June 30, 2017
and
2016
, respectively. These amounts are reflected in cost of sales.
We are subject to additional requirements under greenhouse gas (GHG) emission programs, including the cap-and-trade systems, as discussed in
Note 12
. Under these cap-and-trade systems, we purchase various GHG emission credits available on the open market. Therefore, we are exposed to the volatility in the market price of these credits. The cost to implement certain provisions of the cap-and-trade systems are significant; however, we recovered the majority of these costs from our customers for the three and
six
months ended
June 30, 2017
and
2016
and expect to continue to recover the majority of these costs in the future. For the three and
six
months ended
June 30, 2017
and
2016
, the net cost of meeting our obligations under these compliance programs was immaterial.
Fair Values of Derivative Instruments
The following tables provide information about the fair values of our derivative instruments as of
June 30, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
(in millions) and the line items in the balance sheets in which the fair values are reflected. See
Note 12
for additional information related to the fair values of our derivative instruments.
As indicated in
Note 12
, we net fair value amounts recognized for multiple similar derivative contracts executed with the same counterparty under master netting arrangements, including cash collateral assets and obligations. The tables below, however, are presented on a gross asset and gross liability basis, which results in the reflection of certain assets in liability accounts and certain liabilities in asset accounts.
Balance Sheet
Location
June 30, 2017
Asset
Derivatives
Liability
Derivatives
Derivatives not designated as
hedging instruments
Commodity contracts:
Futures
Receivables, net
$
650
$
605
Swaps
Receivables, net
8
12
Options
Receivables, net
4
2
Physical purchase contracts
Inventories
—
4
Foreign currency contracts
Accrued expenses
—
10
Total
$
662
$
633
27
Table of Contents
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Balance Sheet
Location
December 31, 2016
Asset
Derivatives
Liability
Derivatives
Derivatives not designated as
hedging instruments
Commodity contracts:
Futures
Receivables, net
$
874
$
872
Swaps
Receivables, net
32
21
Options
Receivables, net
6
2
Physical purchase contracts
Inventories
—
5
Foreign currency contracts
Receivables, net
3
—
Total
$
915
$
900
Market Risk
Our price risk management activities involve the receipt or payment of fixed price commitments into the future. These transactions give rise to market risk, which is the risk that future changes in market conditions may make an instrument less valuable. We closely monitor and manage our exposure to market risk on a daily basis in accordance with policies approved by our board of directors. Market risks are monitored by our risk control group to ensure compliance with our stated risk management policy. We do not require any collateral or other security to support derivative instruments into which we enter. We also do not have any derivative instruments that require us to maintain a minimum investment-grade credit rating.
Effect of Derivative Instruments on Income
The following tables provide information about the gain or loss recognized in income on our derivative instruments and the income statement line items in which such gains and losses are reflected (in millions).
Derivatives Designated as
Economic Hedges
Location of Gain (Loss)
Recognized in Income
on Derivatives
Three Months Ended
June 30,
Six Months Ended
June 30,
2017
2016
2017
2016
Commodity contracts
Cost of sales
$
25
$
(113
)
$
(72
)
$
(252
)
Foreign currency contracts
Cost of sales
(20
)
4
(26
)
1
Trading Derivatives
Location of Gain (Loss)
Recognized in Income
on Derivatives
Three Months Ended
June 30,
Six Months Ended
June 30,
2017
2016
2017
2016
Commodity contracts
Cost of sales
$
(3
)
$
(3
)
$
(2
)
$
38
28
Table of Contents
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE OF SAFE HARBOR PROVISIONS OF THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995
This Form 10-Q, including without limitation our disclosures below under the heading “OVERVIEW AND OUTLOOK
,
” includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. You can identify our forward-looking statements by the words “anticipate,” “believe,” “expect,” “plan,” “intend,” “estimate,” “project,” “projection,” “predict,” “budget,” “forecast,” “goal,” “guidance,” “target,” “could,” “should,” “may,” and similar expressions.
These forward-looking statements include, among other things, statements regarding:
•
future refining margins, including gasoline and distillate margins;
•
future ethanol margins;
•
expectations regarding feedstock costs, including crude oil differentials, and operating expenses;
•
anticipated levels of crude oil and refined petroleum product inventories;
•
our anticipated level of capital investments, including deferred costs for refinery turnarounds and catalyst, capital expenditures for environmental and other purposes, and joint venture investments, and the effect of those capital investments on our results of operations;
•
anticipated trends in the supply of and demand for crude oil and other feedstocks and refined petroleum products in the regions where we operate, as well as globally;
•
expectations regarding environmental, tax, and other regulatory initiatives; and
•
the effect of general economic and other conditions on refining, ethanol, and midstream industry fundamentals.
We based our forward-looking statements on our current expectations, estimates, and projections about ourselves and our industry. We caution that these statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks, uncertainties, and assumptions that we cannot predict. In addition, we based many of these forward-looking statements on assumptions about future events that may prove to be inaccurate. Accordingly, our actual results may differ materially from the future performance that we have expressed or forecast in the forward-looking statements. Differences between actual results and any future performance suggested in these forward-looking statements could result from a variety of factors, including the following:
•
acts of terrorism aimed at either our facilities or other facilities that could impair our ability to produce or transport refined petroleum products or receive feedstocks;
•
political and economic conditions in nations that produce crude oil or consume refined petroleum products;
•
demand for, and supplies of, refined petroleum products such as gasoline, diesel, jet fuel, petrochemicals, and ethanol;
•
demand for, and supplies of, crude oil and other feedstocks;
•
the ability of the members of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries to agree on and to maintain crude oil price and production controls;
•
the level of consumer demand, including seasonal fluctuations;
•
refinery overcapacity or undercapacity;
•
our ability to successfully integrate any acquired businesses into our operations;
29
Table of Contents
•
the actions taken by competitors, including both pricing and adjustments to refining capacity in response to market conditions;
•
the level of competitors’ imports into markets that we supply;
•
accidents, unscheduled shutdowns, or other catastrophes affecting our refineries, machinery, pipelines, equipment, and information systems, or those of our suppliers or customers;
•
changes in the cost or availability of transportation for feedstocks and refined petroleum products;
•
the price, availability, and acceptance of alternative fuels and alternative-fuel vehicles;
•
the levels of government subsidies for alternative fuels;
•
the volatility in the market price of biofuel credits (primarily RINs needed to comply with the U.S. federal Renewable Fuel Standard) and GHG emission credits needed to comply with the requirements of various GHG emission programs;
•
delay of, cancellation of, or failure to implement planned capital projects and realize the various assumptions and benefits projected for such projects or cost overruns in constructing such planned capital projects;
•
earthquakes, hurricanes, tornadoes, and irregular weather, which can unforeseeably affect the price or availability of natural gas, crude oil, grain and other feedstocks, and refined petroleum products and ethanol;
•
rulings, judgments, or settlements in litigation or other legal or regulatory matters, including unexpected environmental remediation costs, in excess of any reserves or insurance coverage;
•
legislative or regulatory action, including the introduction or enactment of legislation or rulemakings by governmental authorities, including tax and environmental regulations, such as those implemented under the California Global Warming Solutions Act (also known as AB 32), the Quebec cap-and-trade system, the Ontario cap-and-trade system, and the U.S. EPA’s regulation of GHGs, which may adversely affect our business or operations;
•
changes in the credit ratings assigned to our debt securities and trade credit;
•
changes in currency exchange rates, including the value of the Canadian dollar, the pound sterling, and the euro relative to the U.S. dollar;
•
overall economic conditions, including the stability and liquidity of financial markets; and
•
other factors generally described in the “Risk Factors” section included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2016
that is incorporated by reference herein.
Any one of these factors, or a combination of these factors, could materially affect our future results of operations and whether any forward-looking statements ultimately prove to be accurate. Our forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, and actual results and future performance may differ materially from those suggested in any forward-looking statements. We do not intend to update these statements unless we are required by the securities laws to do so.
All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the foregoing. We undertake no obligation to publicly release any revisions to any such forward-looking statements that may be made to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this report or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
This Form 10-Q includes references to financial measures that are not defined under U.S.
GAAP. These non-GAAP financial measures include adjusted net income attributable to Valero stockholders, gross margin, and adjusted operating income. We have included these non-GAAP financial measures to help facilitate the comparison of operating results between periods. See the accompanying financial tables in “RESULTS OF OPERATIONS” and note (d) to the accompanying tables for reconciliations of these non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP financial measures. Also in note (d), we disclose the reasons why we believe our use of the non-GAAP financial measures provides useful information.
30
Table of Contents
OVERVIEW AND OUTLOOK
Overview
Second Quarter Results
In the
second quarter
of
2017
, we reported net income attributable to Valero stockholders of
$548 million
compared to
$814 million
in the
second quarter
of
2016
, which represents a decrease of
$266 million
. This decrease is primarily due to lower operating income between the periods (net of the resulting decrease of
$95 million
in income tax expense). Operating income was $
871 million
in the
second quarter
of
2017
compared to $
1.2 billion
in the
second quarter
of
2016
, which represents a decrease of $
360 million
.
Operating income and net income attributable to Valero stockholders in the
second quarter
of
2016
were positively impacted by a noncash benefit from a lower of cost or market inventory valuation adjustment, partially offset by a noncash charge from an impairment loss related to our Aruba Terminal. By excluding these items, adjusted operating income was
$833 million
and adjusted net income attributable
to Valero stockholders was
$503 million
for the
second quarter
of
2016
. Compared to these adjusted amounts, operating income and net income attributable to Valero stockholders in the
second quarter
of
2017
increased by
$38 million
and
$45 million
, respectively.
The
$38 million
increase in adjusted operating income
is due primarily to the following:
•
Refining segment.
Refining segment operating income increased by $
57 million
due to higher margins on refined petroleum products and higher throughput volumes, partially offset by lower discounts on sour crude oils, higher cost of biofuel credits, an increase in charges from the VLP segment related to additional transportation and terminaling services provided by that segment to the refining segment, and higher operating expenses. This is more fully described on pages
40
through
42
.
•
Ethanol segment.
Ethanol segment operating income decreased by $
18 million
due to lower ethanol and corn related co-product prices and higher operating expenses, partially offset by lower corn prices. This is more fully described on page
42
.
•
VLP segment.
VLP segment operating income increased by
$19 million
primarily due to incremental revenues generated from transportation and terminaling services provided to the refining segment associated with businesses acquired from Valero in
2016
and the acquisition of an undivided interest in crude system assets in January
2017
. This is more fully described on pages
42
and
43
.
•
General and administrative expenses.
General and administrative expenses increased by
$19 million
primarily due to an increase in legal and environmental reserves and charitable contributions.
First Six Months Results
In the first
six
months of
2017
, we reported net income attributable to Valero stockholders of
$853 million
compared to
$1.3 billion
in the first
six
months of
2016
, which represents a decrease of
$456 million
. This decrease is primarily due to lower operating income between the periods (net of the resulting decrease of $200 million in income tax expense). Operating income was $
1.4 billion
in the first six months of
2017
compared to $
2.1 billion
in the first six months of
2016
, which represents a decrease of
$652 million
.
Operating income and net income attributable to Valero stockholders in the first
six
months of
2016
were positively impacted by a noncash benefit from a lower of cost or market inventory valuation adjustment, partially offset by a noncash charge from an impairment loss related to our Aruba Terminal. By excluding
31
Table of Contents
these items, adjusted operating income was
$1.4 billion
and adjusted net income attributable
to Valero stockholders was
$786 million
for the first six months of
2016
. Compared to these adjusted amounts, operating income and net income attributable to Valero stockholders in the first six months of
2017
increased by $39 million and
$67 million
, respectively.
The $39 million increase in adjusted operating income
is due primarily to the following:
•
Refining segment.
Refining segment operating income increased by
$52 million
due to higher margins on refined petroleum products and higher throughput volumes, partially offset by lower discounts on sour crude oils, higher cost of biofuel credits, an increase in charges from the VLP segment related to additional transportation and terminaling services provided by that segment to the refining segment, and higher operating expenses. This is more fully described on pages
51
through
53
.
•
Ethanol segment.
Ethanol segment operating income decreased by
$5 million
due to lower corn-related co-product prices and higher operating expenses, partially offset by higher ethanol prices and lower corn prices. This is more fully described on pages
53
and
54
.
•
VLP segment.
VLP segment operating income increased by
$46 million
due to incremental revenues generated from transportation and terminaling services provided to the refining segment associated with businesses acquired from Valero in
2016
and the acquisition of an undivided interest in crude system assets in January
2017
. This is more fully described on page
54
.
•
General and administrative expenses.
General and administrative expenses increased by
$53 million
primarily due to an increase in legal and environmental reserves and charitable contributions.
Additional details and analysis of the changes in operating income and adjusted operating income
for our business segments and other components of net income and adjusted net income attributable to Valero stockholders, including a reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures used in this Overview to their most comparable measures reported under U.S.
GAAP, are provided below under “RESULTS OF OPERATIONS” beginning on page
34
.
Effective January 1,
2017
, we revised our reportable segments to reflect a new reportable segment — VLP. The results of operations of the VLP segment were previously included in the refining segment. Our prior period segment information has been retrospectively adjusted to reflect our current segment presentation. See
Note 10
of Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional segment information.
32
Table of Contents
Outlook
Below are several factors that have impacted or may impact our results of operations during the third quarter of
2017
:
•
Product margins are expected to continue to be supported by strong domestic and export demand.
•
Medium and heavy sour crude oil discounts are expected to remain narrower than their five-year averages as supplies of sour crude oils in the market remain suppressed.
•
Sweet crude oil discounts are expected to widen slightly as increased supplies from the Permian Basin are delivered into U.S. Gulf Coast markets.
•
Ethanol margins are expected to remain weak as domestic inventory levels remain at seasonal highs.
33
Table of Contents
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following tables highlight our results of operations, our operating performance, and market prices that directly impact our operations. In addition, these tables include financial measures that are not defined under U.S. GAAP and represent non-GAAP financial measures. These non-GAAP financial measures are reconciled to their most comparable U.S. GAAP financial measures and include adjusted net income attributable to Valero stockholders, adjusted operating income, and gross margin. In note (d) to these tables, we disclose the reasons why we believe our use of non-GAAP financial measures provides useful information.
Effective January 1, 2017, we revised our reportable segments to align with certain changes in how our chief operating decision maker manages and allocates resources to our business. Accordingly, we created a new reportable segment — VLP. The results of the VLP segment, which include the results of our majority-owned master limited partnership referred to by the same name, were transferred from the refining segment. Our prior period segment information has been retrospectively adjusted to reflect our current segment presentation. The narrative following these tables provides an analysis of our results of operations.
Second Quarter Results -
Financial Highlights By Segment and Total Company
(millions of dollars)
Three Months Ended June 30, 2017
Refining
Ethanol
VLP
Corporate
and
Eliminations
Total
Company
Operating revenues:
Operating revenues from external customers
$
21,415
$
839
$
—
$
—
$
22,254
Intersegment revenues
—
28
110
(138
)
—
Total operating revenues
21,415
867
110
(138
)
22,254
Costs and expenses:
Cost of sales:
Cost of sales from external customers
18,899
710
—
—
19,609
Intersegment cost of sales
138
—
—
(138
)
—
Total cost of sales
19,037
710
—
(138
)
19,609
Operating expenses
965
107
27
(2
)
1,097
General and administrative expenses
—
—
—
178
178
Depreciation and amortization expense
454
19
12
14
499
Total costs and expenses
20,456
836
39
52
21,383
Operating income (loss)
$
959
$
31
$
71
$
(190
)
871
Other income, net
16
Interest and debt expense, net of capitalized interest
(119
)
Income before income tax expense
768
Income tax expense
196
Net income
572
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling
interests
24
Net income attributable to
Valero Energy Corporation stockholders
$
548
34
Table of Contents
Second Quarter Results -
Financial Highlights By Segment and Total Company (continued)
(millions of dollars)
Three Months Ended June 30, 2016
Refining
Ethanol
VLP
Corporate
and
Eliminations
Total
Company
Operating revenues:
Operating revenues from external customers
$
18,664
$
920
$
—
$
—
$
19,584
Intersegment revenues
—
45
87
(132
)
—
Total operating revenues
18,664
965
87
(132
)
19,584
Costs and expenses:
Cost of sales (excluding the lower of cost or
market inventory valuation adjustment):
Cost of sales from external customers
16,322
798
—
—
17,120
Intersegment cost of sales
132
—
—
(132
)
—
Total cost of sales (excluding the lower of cost
or market inventory valuation adjustment)
16,454
798
—
(132
)
17,120
Lower of cost or market inventory valuation
adjustment (a)
(434
)
(20
)
—
—
(454
)
Operating expenses (b)
878
99
24
—
1,001
General and administrative expenses
—
—
—
159
159
Depreciation and amortization expense (b)
430
19
11
11
471
Asset impairment loss (c)
56
—
—
—
56
Total costs and expenses
17,384
896
35
38
18,353
Operating income (loss)
$
1,280
$
69
$
52
$
(170
)
1,231
Other income, net
14
Interest and debt expense, net of capitalized interest
(111
)
Income before income tax expense
1,134
Income tax expense
291
Net income
843
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling
interests
29
Net income attributable to
Valero Energy Corporation stockholders
$
814
___________________
See note references on pages
49
through
51
.
35
Table of Contents
Second Quarter Results -
Financial Highlights By Segment and Total Company (continued)
(millions of dollars)
Three Months Ended June 30, 2016
Refining
Ethanol
VLP
Corporate
and
Eliminations
Total
Company
Reconciliation of actual (U.S. GAAP) to
adjusted (non-GAAP) amounts (d)
Actual and adjusted operating income (loss)
Operating income (loss)
$
1,280
$
69
$
52
$
(170
)
$
1,231
Exclude adjustments:
Lower of cost or market inventory valuation
adjustment (a)
434
20
—
—
454
Asset impairment loss (c)
(56
)
—
—
—
(56
)
Adjusted operating income (loss)
$
902
$
49
$
52
$
(170
)
$
833
Actual and adjusted net income attributable to
Valero Energy Corporation stockholders
Net income attributable to
Valero Energy Corporation stockholders
$
814
Exclude adjustments:
Lower of cost or market inventory valuation
adjustment (a)
454
Income tax expense related to lower of cost or
market inventory valuation adjustment
(87
)
Lower of cost or market inventory valuation
adjustment, net of taxes
367
Asset impairment loss (c)
(56
)
Total adjustments
311
Adjusted net income attributable to
Valero Energy Corporation stockholders
$
503
___________________
See note references on pages
49
through
51
.
36
Table of Contents
Second Quarter Results -
Refining Segment Operating Highlights
(millions of dollars, except per barrel amounts)
Three Months Ended June 30,
2017
2016
Change
Throughput volumes (thousand barrels per day)
Feedstocks:
Heavy sour crude oil
517
380
137
Medium/light sour crude oil
508
505
3
Sweet crude oil
1,308
1,196
112
Residuals
228
272
(44
)
Other feedstocks
142
170
(28
)
Total feedstocks
2,703
2,523
180
Blendstocks and other
316
304
12
Total throughput volumes
3,019
2,827
192
Yields (thousand barrels per day)
Gasolines and blendstocks
1,458
1,408
50
Distillates
1,167
1,071
96
Other products (e)
434
379
55
Total yields
3,059
2,858
201
Operating statistics
Gross margin (d)
$
2,378
$
2,210
$
168
Adjusted operating income (d)
$
959
$
902
$
57
Throughput volumes (thousand barrels per day)
3,019
2,827
192
Throughput margin per barrel (f)
$
8.66
$
8.59
$
0.07
Operating costs per barrel:
Operating expenses
3.51
3.41
0.10
Depreciation and amortization expense
1.66
1.67
(0.01
)
Total operating costs per barrel
5.17
5.08
0.09
Adjusted operating income per barrel (g)
$
3.49
$
3.51
$
(0.02
)
___________________
See note references on pages
49
through
51
.
37
Table of Contents
Second Quarter Results -
Ethanol Segment Operating Highlights
(millions of dollars, except per gallon amounts)
Three Months Ended June 30,
2017
2016
Change
Operating statistics
Gross margin (d)
$
157
$
167
$
(10
)
Adjusted operating income (d)
$
31
$
49
$
(18
)
Production volumes (thousand gallons per day)
3,775
3,826
(51
)
Gross margin per gallon of production (f)
$
0.46
$
0.48
$
(0.02
)
Operating costs per gallon of production:
Operating expenses
0.31
0.28
0.03
Depreciation and amortization expense
0.06
0.06
—
Total operating costs per gallon of production
0.37
0.34
0.03
Adjusted operating income per gallon of production (g)
$
0.09
$
0.14
$
(0.05
)
Second Quarter Results -
VLP Segment Operating Highlights
(millions of dollars, except per barrel amounts)
Three Months Ended June 30,
2017
2016
Change
Volumes (thousand barrels per day)
Pipeline transportation throughput
1,003
851
152
Terminaling throughput
2,853
2,146
707
Operating statistics
Pipeline transportation revenue
$
25
$
19
$
6
Pipeline transportation revenue per barrel (f)
$
0.27
$
0.25
$
0.02
Terminaling revenue
$
84
$
68
$
16
Terminaling revenue per barrel (f)
$
0.33
$
0.35
$
(0.02
)
Storage and other revenue
$
1
$
—
$
1
Total operating revenues
$
110
$
87
$
23
___________________
See note references on pages
49
through
51
.
38
Table of Contents
Second Quarter Results -
Average Market Reference Prices and Differentials
(dollars per barrel, except as noted)
Three Months Ended June 30,
2017
2016
Change
Feedstocks
Brent crude oil
$
50.91
$
46.94
$
3.97
Brent less West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil
2.67
1.47
1.20
Brent less Alaska North Slope (ANS) crude oil
0.22
1.22
(1.00
)
Brent less Louisiana Light Sweet (LLS) crude oil
0.60
(0.39
)
0.99
Brent less Argus Sour Crude Index (ASCI) crude oil (h)
3.94
5.01
(1.07
)
Brent less Maya crude oil
7.03
9.21
(2.18
)
LLS crude oil
50.31
47.33
2.98
LLS less ASCI crude oil (h)
3.34
5.40
(2.06
)
LLS less Maya crude oil
6.43
9.60
(3.17
)
WTI crude oil
48.24
45.47
2.77
Natural gas (dollars per million British thermal units (MMBtu))
3.14
2.08
1.06
Products
U.S. Gulf Coast:
CBOB gasoline less Brent
10.38
11.13
(0.75
)
Ultra-low-sulfur diesel less Brent
10.99
9.47
1.52
Propylene less Brent
0.04
(11.79
)
11.83
CBOB gasoline less LLS
10.98
10.74
0.24
Ultra-low-sulfur diesel less LLS
11.59
9.08
2.51
Propylene less LLS
0.64
(12.18
)
12.82
U.S. Mid-Continent:
CBOB gasoline less WTI
14.16
13.77
0.39
Ultra-low-sulfur diesel less WTI
14.60
11.72
2.88
North Atlantic:
CBOB gasoline less Brent
12.57
14.63
(2.06
)
Ultra-low-sulfur diesel less Brent
12.21
11.17
1.04
U.S. West Coast:
CARBOB 87 gasoline less ANS
23.01
21.56
1.45
CARB diesel less ANS
14.32
14.71
(0.39
)
CARBOB 87 gasoline less WTI
25.46
21.81
3.65
CARB diesel less WTI
16.77
14.96
1.81
New York Harbor corn crush (dollars per gallon)
0.26
0.23
0.03
___________________
See note references on pages
49
through
51
.
39
Table of Contents
Total Company, Corporate, and Other
Operating revenues increased $
2.7 billion
and cost of sales increased $
2.5 billion
in the
second quarter
of
2017
compared to the
second quarter
of
2016
due primarily to increases in refined petroleum product prices and crude oil feedstock costs, respectively, associated with our refining segment, reflecting improved product margins of $181 million. This $181 million margin improvement, along with the positive effect of the
$56 million
asset impairment loss related to our Aruba Terminal in the
second quarter
of
2016
, was more than offset by the negative effect of the $
454 million
lower of cost or market inventory valuation adjustment in the
second quarter
of
2016
, as well as increases in operating expenses, general and administrative expenses, and depreciation and amortization expense of $
96 million
, $
19 million
, and $
28 million
, respectively, resulting in a decrease in operating income of
$360 million
. This decrease in operating income is the primary driver of the
$266 million
decrease in net income attributable to Valero stockholders from
$814 million
in the
second quarter
of
2016
to
$548 million
in the
second quarter
of
2017
.
Excluding the
$454 million
benefit from the lower of cost or market inventory valuation adjustment and the asset impairment loss of
$56 million
related to our Aruba Terminal, adjusted operating income for the
second quarter
of
2016
was
$833 million
. Compared to this adjusted amount, operating income increased by
$38 million
in the
second quarter
of
2017
to
$871 million
, with improved product margins being partially offset by the increased costs discussed above. Details regarding changes in product margins, operating expenses, and depreciation and amortization expense are discussed by segment in the individual segment analysis below.
General and administrative expenses increased
$19 million
in the
second quarter
of
2017
compared to the
second quarter
of
2016
primarily due to an increase in legal and environmental reserves and charitable contributions.
Income tax expense decreased
$95 million
from the
second quarter
of
2016
to the
second quarter
of
2017
primarily as a result of lower income before income tax expense. The effective tax rate of
26
percent in both the
second quarter
of
2017
and the
second quarter
of
2016
is lower than the U.S. statutory rate of 35 percent primarily because income from our international operations is taxed at statutory rates that are lower than in the U.S. The effective tax rate for the
second quarter
of
2017
was also impacted by the favorable resolution of an income tax audit.
Refining Segment Results
Refining segment operating revenues increased
$2.8 billion
and cost of sales increased
$2.6 billion
in the
second quarter
of
2017
compared to the
second quarter
of
2016
primarily due to an increase in refined petroleum product prices and crude oil feedstock costs, respectively, reflecting improved product margins (refining gross margin) of
$168 million
. This
$168 million
margin improvement, along with the positive effect of the
$56 million
impairment loss related to our Aruba Terminal in the
second quarter
of
2016
, was more than offset by the negative effect of the
$434 million
lower of cost or market inventory valuation adjustment in the
second quarter
of
2016
, as well as increases in operating expenses and depreciation and amortization expense of
$87 million
and
$24 million
, respectively, resulting in a decrease in operating income of
$321 million
. Excluding the
$434 million
benefit from the lower of cost or market inventory valuation adjustment and the asset impairment loss of
$56 million
related to our Aruba Terminal,
second quarter
2016
adjusted operating income for the refining segment was
$902 million
. Compared to this adjusted amount, operating income increased by
$57 million
in the
second quarter
of
2017
to
$959 million
, with the
$168 million
increase in refining gross margin being partially offset by the
$87 million
increase in operating expenses and the
$24 million
increase in depreciation and amortization expense.
40
Table of Contents
Refining gross margin increased
$168 million
(a
$0.07
per barrel increase) in the
second quarter
of
2017
compared to the
second quarter
of
2016
, primarily due to the following:
•
Increase in distillate margins.
We experienced an increase in distillate margins throughout all of our regions in the
second quarter
of
2017
compared to the
second quarter
of
2016
. For example, the Brent-based benchmark reference margin for U.S. Gulf Coast ultra-low-sulfur diesel was
$10.99
per barrel in the
second quarter
of
2017
compared to
$9.47
per barrel in the
second quarter
of
2016
, representing a favorable increase of
$1.52
per barrel. Another example is the Brent-based benchmark reference margin for North Atlantic ultra-low-sulfur diesel that was
$12.21
per barrel in the
second quarter
of
2017
compared to
$11.17
per barrel in the
second quarter
of
2016
, representing a favorable increase of
$1.04
per barrel. We estimate that the increase in distillate margins in the
second quarter
of
2017
compared to the
second quarter
of
2016
had a favorable impact to our refining margin of approximately $195 million.
•
Higher throughput volumes.
Refining throughput volumes increased by
192,000
barrels per day in the
second quarter
of
2017
. We estimate that the increase in refining throughput volumes had a positive impact on our refining margin of approximately $151 million.
•
Lower discounts on sour crude oils.
The market prices of refined products generally track the price of Brent crude oil, which is a benchmark sweet crude oil, and we benefit when we process crude oils that are priced at a discount to Brent crude oil when pricing terms are favorable. For example, ASCI crude oil sold at a discount of
$3.94
per barrel to Brent crude oil in the second quarter of 2017 compared to a discount of
$5.01
per barrel in the second quarter of 2016, representing an unfavorable decrease of
$1.07
per barrel. Another example is Maya crude oil that sold at a discount of
$7.03
per barrel to Brent crude oil in the second quarter of 2017 compared to a discount of
$9.21
per barrel in the second quarter of 2016, representing a decrease of
$2.18
per barrel. While we benefitted from processing these sour crudes oils in the
second quarter
of
2017
, that benefit declined compared to the
second quarter
of
2016
. We estimate that the reduction in the discounts for sour crude oils that we processed in the second quarter of 2017 had an unfavorable impact to our refining margin of approximately $105 million.
•
Higher costs of biofuel credits.
As more fully described in
Note 13
of Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, we must purchase biofuel credits in order to meet our biofuel blending obligation under various government and regulatory compliance programs, and the cost of these credits (primarily RINs in the U.S.) increased by $82 million from $173 million in the
second quarter
of
2016
to $255 million in the
second quarter
of
2017
.
•
Increase in charges from VLP.
Charges from the VLP segment for transportation and terminaling services increased $23 million in the
second quarter
of
2017
compared to the
second quarter
of
2016
primarily due to new charges from businesses acquired by VLP after the
second quarter
of
2016
. Details regarding the increase in charges from VLP are discussed in the VLP segment analysis below.
The increase of
$87 million
in refining segment operating expenses was primarily due to a $68 million increase in energy costs driven by higher natural gas prices ($
3.14
per MMBtu in the
second quarter
of
2017
compared to $
2.08
per MMBtu in the
second quarter
of
2016
).
The increase of
$24 million
in depreciation and amortization expense was primarily due to an increase of $23 million in refinery turnaround and catalyst amortization expense primarily due to costs incurred in the
41
Table of Contents
latter part of 2016 in connection with significant turnaround projects at our Port Arthur and Texas City Refineries.
Ethanol Segment Results
Ethanol segment operating revenues decreased
$98 million
and cost of sales decreased
$88 million
in the
second quarter
of
2017
compared to the
second quarter
of
2016
primarily due to a decrease in both ethanol prices and corn costs, respectively, reflecting lower product margins (ethanol gross margin) of
$10 million
. This
$10 million
decrease, along with the negative effect of the
$20 million
lower of cost or market inventory valuation adjustment in the
second quarter
of
2016
, and an increase in operating expenses of
$8 million
, resulted in a total decrease in operating income of
$38 million
. Excluding the
$20 million
benefit from the lower of cost or market inventory valuation adjustment,
second quarter
2016
adjusted operating income for the ethanol segment was
$49 million
. Compared to this adjusted amount, operating income decreased by
$18 million
in the
second quarter
of
2017
to
$31 million
.
Ethanol segment gross margin decreased
$10 million
(a
$0.02
per gallon decrease) in the
second quarter
of
2017
compared to the
second quarter
of
2016
primarily due to the following:
•
Lower ethanol prices
. Ethanol prices were slightly lower in the
second quarter
of
2017
compared to the
second quarter
of
2016
primarily due to higher industry production, which resulted in excess domestic inventories. For example, the New York Harbor ethanol price was $1.59 per gallon in the
second quarter
of
2017
compared to $1.65 per gallon in the
second quarter
of
2016
. We estimate this decrease had an unfavorable impact to our ethanol segment margins of $20 million.
•
Lower co-product prices.
A decrease in export demand for corn related co-products, primarily distillers grains, had an unfavorable effect on the prices we received. We estimate that the decrease in corn-related co-product prices had an unfavorable impact to our ethanol margin of $27 million.
•
Lower corn prices.
Corn prices were lower in the
second quarter
of
2017
compared to the
second quarter
of
2016
primarily due to ample corn supplies. For example, the Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT) corn price was $3.68 per bushel in the
second quarter
of
2017
compared to $3.91 per bushel in the
second quarter
of
2016
. We estimate that the decrease in the price of corn had a favorable impact to our ethanol margin of $40 million.
The increase of
$8 million
in ethanol segment operating expenses was primarily due to an increase in energy costs driven by higher natural gas prices ($
3.14
per MMBtu in the
second quarter
of
2017
compared to $
2.08
per MMBtu in the
second quarter
of
2016
).
VLP Segment Results
VLP segment operating revenues increased
$23 million
in the
second quarter
of
2017
compared to the
second quarter
of
2016
primarily due to incremental revenues generated from transportation and terminaling services provided to the refining segment associated with businesses and assets acquired after the
second quarter
of
2016
, as discussed below. This
$23 million
increase in revenues was partially offset by an increase in operating expenses and depreciation and amortization expense of $3 million and $1 million, respectively, resulting in an increase in operating income of
$19 million
.
42
Table of Contents
VLP segment operating revenues increased
$23 million
in the
second quarter
of
2017
compared to the
second quarter
of
2016
, primarily due to the following:
•
Incremental terminaling throughput from acquired business.
VLP experienced a 16 percent increase in terminaling revenues in the
second quarter
of 2017 compared to the
second quarter
of
2016
generated by contributions from the Meraux and Three Rivers Terminal Services Business, which was acquired by VLP from Valero in the third quarter of
2016
. The incremental throughput volumes generated by this business had a favorable impact to VLP’s operating revenues of $14 million.
•
Incremental operating revenues from acquired crude system assets.
Incremental throughput volumes related to the crude system assets that were acquired by VLP in January 2017 had a favorable impact to VLP’s operating revenues of $3 million.
First Six Months Results -
Financial Highlights By Segment and Total Company
(millions of dollars)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2017
Refining
Ethanol
VLP
Corporate
and
Eliminations
Total
Company
Operating revenues:
Operating revenues from external customers
$
42,302
$
1,724
$
—
$
—
$
44,026
Intersegment revenues
—
88
216
(304
)
—
Total operating revenues
42,302
1,812
216
(304
)
44,026
Costs and expenses:
Cost of sales:
Cost of sales from external customers
37,540
1,497
—
—
39,037
Intersegment cost of sales
304
—
—
(304
)
—
Total cost of sales
37,844
1,497
—
(304
)
39,037
Operating expenses
1,949
216
51
(2
)
2,214
General and administrative expenses
—
—
—
368
368
Depreciation and amortization expense
903
46
24
26
999
Total costs and expenses
40,696
1,759
75
88
42,618
Operating income (loss)
$
1,606
$
53
$
141
$
(392
)
1,408
Other income, net
33
Interest and debt expense, net of capitalized interest
(240
)
Income before income tax expense
1,201
Income tax expense
308
Net income
893
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling
interests
40
Net income attributable to
Valero Energy Corporation stockholders
$
853
43
Table of Contents
First Six Months Results -
Financial Highlights By Segment and Total Company (continued)
(millions of dollars)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
Refining
Ethanol
VLP
Corporate
and
Eliminations
Total
Company
Operating revenues:
Operating revenues from external customers
$
33,584
$
1,714
$
—
$
—
$
35,298
Intersegment revenues
—
79
166
(245
)
—
Total operating revenues
33,584
1,793
166
(245
)
35,298
Costs and expenses:
Cost of sales (excluding the lower of cost or
market inventory valuation adjustment):
Cost of sales from external customers
29,121
1,506
—
—
30,627
Intersegment cost of sales
245
—
—
(245
)
—
Total cost of sales (excluding the lower of cost
or market inventory valuation adjustment)
29,366
1,506
—
(245
)
30,627
Lower of cost or market inventory valuation
adjustment (a)
(697
)
(50
)
—
—
(747
)
Operating expenses (b)
1,785
198
48
—
2,031
General and administrative expenses
—
—
—
315
315
Depreciation and amortization expense (b)
879
31
23
23
956
Asset impairment loss (c)
56
—
—
—
56
Total costs and expenses
31,389
1,685
71
93
33,238
Operating income (loss)
$
2,195
$
108
$
95
$
(338
)
2,060
Other income, net
23
Interest and debt expense, net of capitalized interest
(219
)
Income before income tax expense
1,864
Income tax expense
508
Net income
1,356
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling
interests
47
Net income attributable to
Valero Energy Corporation stockholders
$
1,309
___________________
See note references on pages
49
through
51
.
44
Table of Contents
First Six Months Results -
Financial Highlights By Segment and Total Company (continued)
(millions of dollars)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
Refining
Ethanol
VLP
Corporate
and
Eliminations
Total
Company
Reconciliation of actual (U.S. GAAP) to
adjusted (non-GAAP) amounts (d)
Actual and adjusted operating income (loss)
Operating income (loss)
$
2,195
$
108
$
95
$
(338
)
$
2,060
Exclude adjustments:
Lower of cost or market inventory valuation
adjustment (a)
697
50
—
—
747
Asset impairment loss (c)
(56
)
—
—
—
(56
)
Adjusted operating income (loss)
$
1,554
$
58
$
95
$
(338
)
$
1,369
Actual and adjusted net income attributable to
Valero Energy Corporation stockholders
Net income attributable to
Valero Energy Corporation stockholders
$
1,309
Exclude adjustments:
Lower of cost or market inventory valuation
adjustment (a)
747
Income tax expense related to lower of cost or
market inventory valuation adjustment
(168
)
Lower of cost or market inventory valuation
adjustment, net of taxes
579
Asset impairment loss (c)
(56
)
Total adjustments
523
Adjusted net income attributable to
Valero Energy Corporation stockholders
$
786
___________________
See note references on pages
49
through
51
.
45
Table of Contents
First Six Months Results -
Refining Segment Operating Highlights
(millions of dollars, except per barrel amounts)
Six Months Ended June 30,
2017
2016
Change
Throughput volumes (thousand barrels per day)
Feedstocks:
Heavy sour crude oil
483
404
79
Medium/light sour crude oil
482
519
(37
)
Sweet crude oil
1,277
1,184
93
Residuals
231
281
(50
)
Other feedstocks
145
152
(7
)
Total feedstocks
2,618
2,540
78
Blendstocks and other
311
313
(2
)
Total throughput volumes
2,929
2,853
76
Yields (thousand barrels per day)
Gasolines and blendstocks
1,409
1,393
16
Distillates
1,129
1,069
60
Other products (e)
429
425
4
Total yields
2,967
2,887
80
Operating statistics
Gross margin (d)
$
4,458
$
4,218
$
240
Adjusted operating income (d)
$
1,606
$
1,554
$
52
Throughput volumes (thousand barrels per day)
2,929
2,853
76
Throughput margin per barrel (f)
$
8.41
$
8.12
$
0.29
Operating costs per barrel:
Operating expenses
3.68
3.44
0.24
Depreciation and amortization expense
1.70
1.69
0.01
Total operating costs per barrel
5.38
5.13
0.25
Adjusted operating income per barrel (g)
$
3.03
$
2.99
$
0.04
___________________
See note references on pages
49
through
51
.
46
Table of Contents
First Six Months Results -
Ethanol Segment Operating Highlights
(millions of dollars, except per gallon amounts)
Six Months Ended June 30,
2017
2016
Change
Operating statistics
Gross margin (d)
$
315
$
287
$
28
Adjusted operating income (d)
$
53
$
58
$
(5
)
Production volumes (thousand gallons per day)
3,908
3,783
125
Gross margin per gallon of production (f)
$
0.45
$
0.42
$
0.03
Operating costs per gallon of production:
Operating expenses
0.31
0.29
0.02
Depreciation and amortization expense
0.06
0.05
0.01
Total operating costs per gallon of production
0.37
0.34
0.03
Adjusted operating income per gallon of production (g)
$
0.08
$
0.08
$
—
First Six Months Results -
VLP Segment Operating Highlights
(millions of dollars, except per barrel amounts)
Six Months Ended June 30,
2017
2016
Change
Volumes (thousand barrels per day)
Pipeline transportation throughput
983
885
98
Terminaling throughput
2,794
1,998
796
Operating statistics
Pipeline transportation revenue
$
48
$
39
$
9
Pipeline transportation revenue per barrel (f)
$
0.27
$
0.25
$
0.02
Terminaling revenue
$
167
$
127
$
40
Terminaling revenue per barrel (f)
$
0.33
$
0.35
$
(0.02
)
Storage and other revenue
$
1
$
—
$
1
Total operating revenues
$
216
$
166
$
50
___________________
See note references on pages
49
through
51
.
47
Table of Contents
First Six Months Results -
Average Market Reference Prices and Differentials
(dollars per barrel, except as noted)
Six Months Ended June 30,
2017
2016
Change
Feedstocks
Brent crude oil
$
52.78
$
41.04
$
11.74
Brent less WTI crude oil
2.74
1.68
1.06
Brent less ANS crude oil
0.52
0.96
(0.44
)
Brent less LLS crude oil
0.86
(0.17
)
1.03
Brent less ASCI crude oil (h)
4.50
5.19
(0.69
)
Brent less Maya crude oil
8.48
9.15
(0.67
)
LLS crude oil
51.92
41.21
10.71
LLS less ASCI crude oil (h)
3.64
5.36
(1.72
)
LLS less Maya crude oil
7.62
9.32
(1.70
)
WTI crude oil
50.04
39.36
10.68
Natural gas (dollars per MMBtu)
3.05
2.01
1.04
Products
U.S. Gulf Coast:
CBOB gasoline less Brent
9.58
9.47
0.11
Ultra-low-sulfur diesel less Brent
11.06
8.70
2.36
Propylene less Brent
0.63
(7.09
)
7.72
CBOB gasoline less LLS
10.44
9.30
1.14
Ultra-low-sulfur diesel less LLS
11.92
8.53
3.39
Propylene less LLS
1.49
(7.26
)
8.75
U.S. Mid-Continent:
CBOB gasoline less WTI
13.44
11.89
1.55
Ultra-low-sulfur diesel less WTI
14.30
11.38
2.92
North Atlantic:
CBOB gasoline less Brent
10.63
12.47
(1.84
)
Ultra-low-sulfur diesel less Brent
12.14
10.35
1.79
U.S. West Coast:
CARBOB 87 gasoline less ANS
19.89
19.45
0.44
CARB diesel less ANS
14.58
12.95
1.63
CARBOB 87 gasoline less WTI
22.11
20.17
1.94
CARB diesel less WTI
16.80
13.67
3.13
New York Harbor corn crush (dollars per gallon)
0.26
0.18
0.08
___________________
See note references on pages
49
through
51
.
48
Table of Contents
The following notes relate to references on pages
34
through
39
and
43
through
48
.
(a)
During the three months ended
June 30, 2016
, we recorded a change in our lower of cost or market inventory valuation reserve that was established on
December 31, 2015
, resulting in a noncash benefit of
$454 million
(
$434 million
and
$20 million
attributable to our refining and ethanol segments, respectively). During the
six
months ended
June 30, 2016
, we recorded a change in our lower of cost or market inventory valuation reserve that was established on
December 31, 2015
, resulting in a noncash benefit of
$747 million
(
$697 million
and
$50 million
attributable to our refining and ethanol segments, respectively). This adjustment is further discussed in
Note 3
of Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
(b)
The VLP segment information for the three and
six
months ended
June 30, 2016
has been retrospectively adjusted for VLP’s acquisitions that occurred subsequent to
June 30, 2016
.
(c)
Effective October 1, 2016, we (i) transferred ownership of all of our assets in Aruba, other than certain hydrocarbon inventories and working capital, to Refineria di Aruba N.V., an entity wholly-owned by the GOA, (ii) settled our obligations under various agreements with the GOA, including agreements that required us to dismantle our leasehold improvements under certain conditions, and (iii) sold the working capital of our Aruba operations, including hydrocarbon inventories, to the GOA, CITGO Aruba Refining N.V. (CAR), and CITGO Petroleum Corporation (together with CAR and certain other affiliates, collectively, CITGO). We refer to this transaction as the “Aruba Disposition.”
In June 2016, we recognized an asset impairment loss of
$56 million
representing all of the remaining carrying value of the long-lived assets of our crude oil and refined petroleum products terminal and transshipment facility in Aruba (collectively, the Aruba Terminal). We recognized the impairment loss at that time because we concluded that it was more likely than not that we would ultimately transfer ownership of these assets to the GOA as a result of agreements entered into in June 2016 between the GOA and CITGO providing for, among other things, the GOA’s lease of those assets to CITGO.
(d)
We use certain financial measures (as noted below) that are not defined under U.S.
GAAP and are considered to be non-GAAP measures.
We have defined these non-GAAP measures and believe they are useful to the external users of our financial statements, including industry analysts, investors, lenders, and rating agencies. We believe these measures are useful to assess our ongoing financial performance because, when reconciled to their most comparable U.S.
GAAP measures, they provide improved comparability between periods through the exclusion of certain items that we believe are not indicative of our core operating performance and that may obscure our underlying business results and trends. These non-GAAP measures should not be considered as alternatives to their most comparable U.S.
GAAP measures nor should they be considered in isolation or as a substitute for an analysis of our results of operations as reported under U.S.
GAAP. In addition, these non-GAAP measures may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies because we may define them differently, which diminishes the utility of these measures.
Non-GAAP measures are as follows:
◦
Adjusted net income attributable to Valero Energy Corporation stockholders
is defined as net income attributable to Valero Energy Corporation stockholders excluding the lower of cost or market inventory valuation adjustment and its related income tax effect, and the asset impairment loss.
49
Table of Contents
◦
Gross margin for the refining and ethanol segments
is defined as operating income excluding the lower of cost or market inventory valuation adjustment, operating expenses, depreciation and amortization expense, and the asset impairment loss as shown below:
Three Months Ended June 30,
2017
2016
Refining
Ethanol
Refining
Ethanol
Reconciliation of operating income
to gross margin
Operating income
$
959
$
31
$
1,280
$
69
Add back:
Lower of cost or market inventory
valuation adjustment (a)
—
—
(434
)
(20
)
Operating expenses
965
107
878
99
Depreciation and amortization expense
454
19
430
19
Asset impairment loss
—
—
56
—
Gross margin
$
2,378
$
157
$
2,210
$
167
Six Months Ended June 30,
2017
2016
Refining
Ethanol
Refining
Ethanol
Reconciliation of operating income
to gross margin
Operating income
$
1,606
$
53
$
2,195
$
108
Add back:
Lower of cost or market inventory
valuation adjustment (a)
—
—
(697
)
(50
)
Operating expenses
1,949
216
1,785
198
Depreciation and amortization expense
903
46
879
31
Asset impairment loss
—
—
56
—
Gross margin
$
4,458
$
315
$
4,218
$
287
◦
Adjusted operating income
is defined as operating income excluding the lower of cost or market inventory valuation adjustment and asset impairment loss.
(e)
Other products primarily include petrochemicals, gas oils, No. 6 fuel oil, petroleum coke, sulfur, and asphalt.
(f)
Throughput margin per barrel represents gross margin (as defined in (d) above) for our refining segment divided by throughput volumes. Gross margin per gallon of production represents gross margin (as defined in (d) above) for our ethanol segment divided by production volumes. Pipeline transportation revenue per barrel and terminaling revenue per barrel represents pipeline transportation revenue and terminaling revenue for our VLP segment divided by pipeline transportation throughput and terminaling throughput volumes, respectively. Throughput and production volumes are calculated by multiplying throughput and production volumes per day (as provided in the accompanying tables) by the number of days in the applicable period.
(g)
Adjusted operating income per barrel represents adjusted operating income (defined in (d) above) for our refining segment divided by throughput volumes. Adjusted operating income per gallon of production represents adjusted operating income (defined in (d) above) for our ethanol segment divided by production volumes. Throughput and
50
Table of Contents
production volumes are calculated by multiplying throughput and production volumes per day (as provided in the accompanying tables) by the number of days in the applicable period.
(h)
Average market reference price differentials to Mars crude oil have been replaced by average market reference price differentials to ASCI crude oil. Mars crude oil is one of the three grades of sour crude oil used to create ASCI crude oil, and therefore, ASCI crude oil is a more comprehensive price marker for medium sour crude oil. Accordingly, the price differentials for ASCI crude oil for the three and
six
months ended
June 30, 2016
are included to conform to the current presentation.
Total Company, Corporate, and Other
Operating revenues increased
$8.7 billion
and cost of sales increased
$8.4 billion
in the first
six
months of
2017
compared to the first
six
months of
2016
due primarily to increases in refined petroleum product prices associated with our refining segment, reflecting improved product margins of
$318 million
. This
$318 million
margin improvement, along with the positive effect of the
$56 million
asset impairment loss related to our Aruba Terminal in the second quarter of
2016
, was more than offset by the negative effect of the $
747 million
lower of cost or market inventory valuation adjustment in the first
six
months of
2016
, as well as increases in operating expenses, general and administrative expenses, and depreciation and amortization expense of
$183 million
,
$53 million
, and
$43 million
, respectively, resulting in a decrease in operating income of
$652 million
. This decrease in operating income is the primary driver of the
$456 million
decrease in net income attributable to Valero stockholders from
$1.3 billion
in the first
six
months of
2016
to
$853 million
in the first
six
months of
2017
.
Excluding the
$747 million
benefit from the lower of cost or market inventory valuation adjustment and the asset impairment loss of
$56 million
related to our Aruba Terminal, adjusted operating income for the first
six
months of
2016
was
$1.4 billion
. Compared to this adjusted amount, operating income increased by $39 million in the first
six
months of
2017
to
$1.4 billion
, with improved product margins being partially offset by the increased costs discussed above. Details regarding changes in product margins, operating expenses, and depreciation and amortization expense are discussed by segment in the individual segment analysis below.
General and administrative expenses increased
$53 million
in the first
six
months of
2017
compared to the first
six
months of
2016
primarily due to an increase in legal and environmental reserves and charitable contributions.
Income tax expense decreased
$200 million
from the first
six
months of
2016
to the first
six
months of
2017
primarily as a result of lower income before income tax expense. The effective tax rates of
26
percent in the first
six
months of
2017
and
27
percent in the first
six
months of
2016
are lower than the U.S. statutory rate of 35 percent primarily because income from our international operations is taxed at statutory rates that are lower than in the U.S. The effective tax rate in the first
six
months of
2017
was lower than the rate in the first
six
months of
2016
primarily due to the favorable resolution of an income tax audit.
Refining Segment Results
Refining segment operating revenues increased
$8.7 billion
and cost of sales increased
$8.5 billion
in the first
six
months of
2017
compared to the first
six
months of
2016
primarily due to an increase in refined petroleum product prices and crude oil feedstock costs, respectively, reflecting improved product margins (refining gross margin) of
$240 million
. This
$240 million
margin improvement, along with the positive effect of the
$56 million
asset impairment loss related to our Aruba Terminal in the second quarter of 2016, was more than offset by the negative effect of the
$697 million
lower of cost or market inventory valuation adjustment in the first
six
months of
2016
, as well as increases in operating expenses and depreciation and amortization expense of $
164 million
and
$24 million
, respectively, resulting in a decrease in operating
51
Table of Contents
income of $
589 million
. Excluding the $
697 million
benefit from the lower of cost or market inventory valuation adjustment and the asset impairment loss of
$56 million
related to our Aruba Terminal, adjusted operating income for the refining segment in the first
six
months of
2016
was $
1.6 billion
. Compared to this adjusted amount, operating income increased by $
52 million
in the first
six
months of
2017
to $
1.6 billion
, with the
$240 million
increase in refining gross margin being partially offset by the $
164 million
increase in operating expenses and the
$24 million
increase in depreciation and amortization expense.
Refining gross margin increased
$240 million
(a
$0.29
per barrel increase) in the first
six
months of
2017
compared to the first
six
months of
2016
, primarily due to the following:
•
Increase in distillate margins.
We experienced an increase in distillate margins throughout all of our regions in the first
six
months of
2017
compared to the first
six
months of
2016
. For example, the Brent-based benchmark reference margin for U.S. Gulf Coast ultra-low-sulfur diesel was
$11.06
per barrel in the first
six
months of
2017
compared to
$8.70
per barrel in the first
six
months of
2016
, representing a favorable increase of
$2.36
per barrel. Another example is the Brent-based benchmark reference margin for North Atlantic ultra-low-sulfur diesel that was
$12.14
per barrel in the first
six
months of
2017
compared to
$10.35
per barrel in the first
six
months of
2016
, representing a favorable increase of
$1.79
per barrel. We estimate that the increase in distillate margins in the first
six
months of
2017
compared to the first
six
months of
2016
had a favorable impact to our refining margin of approximately $445 million.
•
Higher throughput volumes.
Refining throughput volumes increased by
76,000
barrels per day in the first
six
months of
2017
. We estimate that the increase in refining throughput volumes had a positive impact on our refining margin of approximately $116 million.
•
Lower discounts on other feedstocks.
In addition to crude oil, we utilize other feedstocks, such as residuals, in certain of our refining processes. We benefit when we process these other feedstocks that are priced at a discount to Brent crude oil when pricing terms are favorable. While we benefitted from processing these types of feedstocks in the first
six
months of
2017
, that benefit declined compared to the first
six
months of
2016
. We estimate that the reduction in the discounts for the other feedstocks that we processed in the first
six
months of
2017
had an unfavorable impact to our refining margin of approximately $120 million.
•
Lower discounts on sour crude oils.
The market prices of refined products generally track the price of Brent crude oil, which is a benchmark crude oil, and we benefit when we process crude oils that are priced at a discount to Brent crude oil when pricing terms are favorable. For example, ASCI crude oil processed in our U.S. Gulf Coast region sold at a discount of
$4.50
per barrel to Brent crude oil in the first
six
months of
2017
compared to a discount of
$5.19
per barrel in the first
six
months of
2016
, representing an unfavorable decrease of
$0.69
per barrel. Another example is Maya crude oil, which sold at a discount of
$8.48
per barrel to Brent crude oil in in the first
six
months of
2017
compared to
$9.15
per barrel in the first
six
months of
2016
, representing an unfavorable decrease of
$0.67
per barrel. While we benefitted from processing these sour crude oils in the first
six
months of
2017
, that benefit declined compared to the first
six
months of
2016
. We estimate that the reduction in the discounts for sour crude oils that we processed in the first
six
months of
2017
had an unfavorable impact to our refining margins of $71 million.
•
Higher costs of biofuel credits.
As more fully described in
Note 13
of Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, we must purchase biofuel credits in order to meet our biofuel blending obligation under various government and regulatory compliance programs, and the cost
52
Table of Contents
of these credits (primarily RINs in the U.S.) increased by $67 million from
$334 million
in the first
six
months of
2016
to $401 million in the first
six
months of
2017
.
•
Increase in charges from VLP.
Charges from the VLP segment for transportation and terminaling services increased $50 million in the first
six
months of
2017
compared to the first
six
months of
2016
primarily due to new charges from businesses acquired by VLP in
2016
. Details regarding the increase in charges from VLP are discussed in the VLP segment analysis below.
The increase of
$164 million
in refining segment operating expenses was primarily due to a $106 million
increase in energy costs driven by higher natural gas prices ($
3.05
per MMBtu in the first
six
months of
2017
compared to $
2.01
per MMBtu in the first
six
months of
2016
) and a $33 million increase in costs associated with maintenance activities.
The increase of
$24 million
in depreciation and amortization expense was primarily due to an increase of $35 million in refinery turnaround and catalyst amortization expense primarily due to costs incurred in the latter part of 2016 in connection with significant turnaround projects at our Port Arthur and Texas City Refineries, partially offset by the effect of a $16 million write-off of a cancelled project, which increased depreciation and amortization expense in 2016.
Ethanol Segment Results
Ethanol segment operating revenues increased
$19 million
and cost of sales decreased
$9 million
in the first
six
months of
2017
compared to the first
six
months of
2016
primarily due to an increase in ethanol and corn-related co-product prices and a decrease in corn costs, reflecting improved product margins (ethanol gross margin) of
$28 million
. This
$28 million
margin improvement was more than offset by the negative effect of the
$50 million
lower of cost or market inventory valuation adjustment in the first
six
months of
2016
, as well as increases in operating expenses and depreciation and amortization expense of
$18 million
and
$15 million
, respectively, resulting in a decrease in operating income of
$55 million
. Excluding the
$50 million
benefit from the lower of cost or market inventory valuation adjustment, adjusted operating income for the ethanol segment in the first
six
months of
2016
was
$58 million
. Compared to this adjusted amount, operating income decreased by
$5 million
in the first
six
months of
2017
to
$53 million
, with the increase in ethanol gross margin being offset by the
$18 million
increase in operating expenses and the
$15 million
increase in depreciation and amortization expense.
Ethanol segment gross margin increased
$28 million
(a
$0.03
per gallon increase) in the
six
months of
2017
compared to the first
six
months of
2016
primarily due to the following:
•
Lower corn prices.
Corn prices were lower in the first
six
months of
2017
compared to the first
six
months of
2016
due to higher domestic corn supply. For example, the CBOT corn price was $3.66 per bushel in the first
six
months of
2017
compared to $3.77 per bushel in the first
six
months of
2016
. We estimate that the decrease in the price of corn had a favorable impact to our ethanol margin of $48 million.
•
Higher ethanol prices.
Ethanol prices were slightly higher in the first
six
months of
2017
compared to the first
six
months of
2016
primarily due to increased ethanol demand, partially offset by the impact of excess domestic inventories. For example, the New York Harbor ethanol price was $1.59 per gallon in the first
six
months of
2017
compared to $1.55 per gallon in the first
six
months of
2016
. We estimate that the increase in the price of ethanol had a favorable impact to our ethanol margin of $15 million.
53
Table of Contents
•
Increased production volumes.
Ethanol margin was favorably impacted by increased production volumes of
125,000
gallons per day in the first
six
months of
2017
compared to the first
six
months of
2016
due to improved operating efficiencies and mechanical reliability. We estimate that the increase in production volumes had a positive impact to our ethanol margin of $11 million.
•
Lower co-product prices.
A decrease in export demand for corn-related co-products, primarily distillers grains, had an unfavorable effect on the prices we received. We estimate that the decrease in corn-related co-product prices had an unfavorable impact to our ethanol margin of $46 million.
The increase of
$18 million
in ethanol segment operating expenses was primarily due to an increase in energy costs driven by higher natural gas prices ($
3.05
per MMBtu in the first
six
months of
2017
compared to $
2.01
per MMBtu in the first
six
months of
2016
).
The increase of
$15 million
in ethanol segment depreciation and amortization expense was primarily due to write-offs of assets that were idled in the first
six
months of
2017
.
VLP Segment Results
VLP segment operating revenues increased
$50 million
in the first
six
months of
2017
compared to the first
six
months of
2016
primarily due to incremental revenues generated from transportation and terminaling services provided to the refining segment associated with businesses and assets acquired in
2016
, as discussed below. This
$50 million
increase in revenues was partially offset by higher operating expenses and depreciation and amortization expense of $3 million and $1 million, respectively, resulting in an increase in operating income of
$46 million
.
VLP segment operating revenues increased
$50 million
in the first
six
months of
2017
compared to the first
six
months of
2016
, primarily due to the following:
•
Incremental terminaling throughput from acquired businesses.
VLP experienced a 22 percent increase in terminaling revenues in the first
six
months of
2017
compared to the first
six
months of
2016
generated by contributions from the McKee Terminal Services Business and the Meraux and Three Rivers Terminal Services Business, which were acquired by VLP from Valero in the second and third quarters of 2016, respectively. The incremental throughput volumes generated by these businesses had a favorable impact to VLP’s operating revenues of $37 million.
•
Incremental operating revenues from acquired crude system assets.
Incremental throughput volumes related to the crude system assets that were acquired by VLP in January 2017 had a favorable impact to VLP’s operating revenues of $5 million.
54
Table of Contents
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash Flows for the
Six Months Ended June 30,
2017
Our operations generated
$2.8 billion
of cash in the first
six
months of
2017
, driven primarily by net income of
$893 million
, noncash charges to income of
$999 million
related to depreciation and amortization expense, and a positive change in working capital of
$859 million
. See “RESULTS OF OPERATIONS” for further discussion of our operations. The change in our working capital is further detailed in
Note 11
of Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. This source of cash mainly resulted from:
•
a decrease in receivables, partially offset by a decrease in accounts payable, primarily as a result of the timing of collections of receivables and payments of invoices, respectively, combined with a decrease in commodity prices;
•
an increase in accrued expenses mainly due to the timing of payments on our environmental compliance program obligations; and
•
a decrease in inventory volumes held.
The
$2.8 billion
of cash generated by our operations, along with (i) net proceeds of
$36 million
from VLP’s sale of common units representing limited partner interests to the public and (ii)
$108 million
from a favorable foreign exchange rate change on cash, were used mainly to:
•
fund
$1.1 billion
in capital investments, which include capital expenditures, deferred turnaround and catalyst costs, and equity-method joint venture investments;
•
acquire an undivided interest in crude system assets for
$72 million
;
•
purchase common stock for treasury of
$660 million
;
•
pay common stock dividends of
$627 million
;
•
pay distributions to noncontrolling interests of
$45 million
; and
•
increase available cash on hand by
$391 million
.
Cash Flows for the
Six Months Ended June 30,
2016
Our operations generated
$3.0 billion
of cash in the first
six
months of
2016
, driven primarily by net income of
$1.4 billion
, noncash charges to income of
$460 million
, and a positive change in working capital of
$1.1 billion
. Noncash charges included
$956 million
of depreciation and amortization expense,
$56 million
for the asset impairment loss associated with our Aruba Terminal, and
$195 million
of deferred income tax expense, partially offset by a benefit of
$747 million
from a lower of cost or market inventory valuation adjustment. See “RESULTS OF OPERATIONS” for further discussion of our operations. The change in our working capital is further detailed in
Note 11
of Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. This source of cash mainly resulted from:
•
an increase in accounts payable, partially offset by an increase in receivables, primarily as a result of increasing commodity prices; and
•
the partial liquidation of our inventories.
The
$3.0 billion
of cash generated by our operations, along with debt borrowings of
$197 million
(primarily $139 million under the VLP Revolver, as discussed in
Note 4
of Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements), were used mainly to:
•
fund $940 million in capital investments, which include capital expenditures, deferred turnaround and catalyst costs, and equity-method joint venture investments;
55
Table of Contents
•
pay a long-term liability of
$137 million
owed to a joint venture partner for an owner-method joint venture investment;
•
purchase common stock for treasury of
$665 million
;
•
pay common stock dividends of
$564 million
;
•
pay distributions to noncontrolling interests of
$47 million
; and
•
increase available cash on hand by
$811 million
.
Capital Investments
For
2017
, we expect to incur approximately $2.7 billion for capital investments, including capital expenditures, deferred turnaround and catalyst costs, and equity-method joint venture investments. This consists of approximately $1.6 billion for stay-in-business capital and $1.1 billion for growth strategies, including our investment in Diamond Pipeline LLC (Diamond Pipeline) described below. This capital investment estimate excludes potential strategic acquisitions. We continuously evaluate our capital budget and make changes as conditions warrant.
We hold equity-method investments in joint ventures and we invest in these joint ventures or enter into new joint venture arrangements to enhance our operations. We have a 50 percent interest in Diamond Pipeline, which was formed by Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. (Plains) to construct and operate a 440-mile, 20-inch crude oil pipeline with a capacity of up to 200,000 barrels per day. The pipeline will deliver domestic sweet crude oil from the Plains’ Cushing, Oklahoma terminal to our Memphis Refinery and will have the ability to connect into the Capline Pipeline. The pipeline is expected to be completed in December 2017 for an estimated cost of $925 million. We have made cumulative cash contributions of $352 million into Diamond Pipeline through June 2017 and expect to contribute $111 million during the remainder of 2017.
Contractual Obligations
As of
June 30, 2017
, our contractual obligations included debt, capital lease obligations, operating leases, purchase obligations, and other long-term liabilities. There were no material changes outside the ordinary course of business with respect to these contractual obligations during the
six
months ended
June 30, 2017
. However, in the ordinary course of business, we recognized capital lease assets and related obligations totaling approximately
$490 million
in January 2017 for the lease of storage tanks located at three of our refineries. These lease agreements have initial terms of
10
years each with successive
10
-year automatic renewals.
In July 2017, we entered into long-term agreements with Infraestructura Energetica Nova, S.A.B. de C.V. (IEnova) for the receipt, storage, and delivery of refined petroleum products at three terminals, including a marine terminal at the Port of Veracruz, Mexico and two inland terminals near Puebla and Mexico City, Mexico. IEnova plans to construct and operate the terminals, with completion of the Veracruz terminal expected in late 2018 and completion of the Puebla and Mexico City terminals expected in early 2019. The Veracruz, Puebla, and Mexico City terminals are expected to have storage capacity of approximately 1.4 million barrels, 500,000 barrels, and 800,000 barrels, respectively. In addition to our commitments to use these terminals, we also hold options to acquire a 50 percent equity interest in each terminal.
56
Table of Contents
Our debt and financing agreements do not have rating agency triggers that would automatically require us to post additional collateral. However, in the event of certain downgrades of our senior unsecured debt by the ratings agencies, the cost of borrowings under some of our bank credit facilities and other arrangements would increase. All of our ratings on our senior unsecured debt are at or above investment grade level as follows:
Rating
Rating Agency
Valero
VLP
Moody’s Investors Service
Baa2 (stable outlook)
Baa3 (stable outlook)
Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services
BBB (stable outlook)
BBB- (stable outlook)
Fitch Ratings
BBB (stable outlook)
BBB- (stable outlook)
We cannot provide assurance that these ratings will remain in effect for any given period of time or that one or more of these ratings will not be lowered or withdrawn entirely by a rating agency. We note that these credit ratings are not recommendations to buy, sell, or hold our securities and may be revised or withdrawn at any time by the rating agency. Each rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating. Any future reduction below investment grade or withdrawal of one or more of our credit ratings could have a material adverse impact on our ability to obtain short- and long-term financing and the cost of such financings.
Summary of Credit Facilities
We had outstanding borrowings, letters of credit issued, and availability under our credit facilities as follows (in millions):
June 30, 2017
Facility
Amount
Maturity Date
Outstanding
Borrowings
Letters of
Credit Issued
Availability
Committed facilities:
Valero Revolver
$
3,000
November 2020
$
—
$
150
$
2,850
VLP Revolver
$
750
November 2020
$
30
$
—
$
720
Canadian Revolver
C$
25
November 2017
C$
—
C$
10
C$
15
Accounts receivable
sales facility (a)
$
1,300
July 2017
$
100
n/a
$
999
Letter of credit facility
$
100
November 2017
n/a
$
—
$
100
Uncommitted facilities:
Letter of credit facilities
n/a
n/a
n/a
$
202
n/a
___________________
(a)
As of June 30, 2017, the actual availability under the accounts receivable sales facility fell below the facility borrowing capacity to
$1.1 billion
due to a decrease in eligible trade receivables. In July 2017, we amended this facility to extend the maturity date from July 2017 to
July 2018
.
Letters of credit issued as of
June 30, 2017
expire at various times in 2017 through 2018.
Other Matters Impacting Liquidity and Capital Resources
Stock Purchase Program
On
September 21, 2016
, our board of directors authorized our purchase of up to an additional
$2.5 billion
of our outstanding common stock (the 2016 program) with no expiration date. This authorization was in addition to the remaining amount available under a
$2.5 billion
program authorized on
July 13, 2015
(the 2015 program). During the first quarter of 2017, we completed our purchases under the 2015 program. As
57
Table of Contents
of
June 30, 2017
, we had approximately
$1.9 billion
remaining available under the 2016 program. We have no obligation to make purchases under this program.
Pension Plan Funding
As further discussed in
Note 8
of Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, management has elected to increase the discretionary contributions to our pension plans by
$80 million
in the third quarter of 2017, resulting in expected contributions to our pension plans of
$108 million
for 2017. Our plan to contribute approximately
$19 million
to our other postretirement benefit plans during
2017
remains unchanged.
Environmental Matters
Our operations are subject to extensive environmental regulations by governmental authorities relating to the discharge of materials into the environment, waste management, pollution prevention measures, GHG emissions, and characteristics and composition of gasolines and distillates. Because environmental laws and regulations are becoming more complex and stringent and new environmental laws and regulations are continuously being enacted or proposed, the level of future expenditures required for environmental matters could increase in the future as previously discussed above in “OUTLOOK.” In addition, any major upgrades in any of our operating facilities could require material additional expenditures to comply with environmental laws and regulations. See
Note 5
of Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a further discussion of our environmental matters.
Tax Matters
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has ongoing tax audits related to our U.S. federal income tax returns from 2010 through 2015, and we have received Revenue Agent Reports (RARs) in connection with the 2010 and 2011 audit. We are contesting certain tax positions and assertions included in the RARs and continue to make progress in resolving certain of these matters with the IRS. We believe that the ultimate settlement of these audits will not be material to our financial position, results of operations, or liquidity.
Cash Held by Our International Subsidiaries
We operate in countries outside the U.S. through subsidiaries incorporated in these countries, and the earnings of these subsidiaries are taxed by the countries in which they are incorporated. We intend to reinvest these earnings indefinitely in our international operations even though we are not restricted from repatriating such earnings to the U.S. in the form of cash dividends. Should we decide to repatriate such earnings, we would incur and pay taxes on the amounts repatriated. In addition, such repatriation could cause us to record deferred tax expense that could significantly impact our results of operations. We believe, however, that a substantial portion of our international cash can be returned to the U.S. without significant tax consequences through means other than a repatriation of earnings. As of
June 30, 2017
,
$2.7 billion
of our cash and temporary cash investments was held by our international subsidiaries.
Concentration of Customers
Our operations have a concentration of customers in the refining industry and customers who are refined petroleum product wholesalers and retailers. These concentrations of customers may impact our overall exposure to credit risk, either positively or negatively, in that these customers may be similarly affected by changes in economic or other conditions. However, we believe that our portfolio of accounts receivable is sufficiently diversified to the extent necessary to minimize potential credit risk. Historically, we have not had any significant problems collecting our accounts receivable.
58
Table of Contents
Sources of Liquidity
We believe that we have sufficient funds from operations and, to the extent necessary, from borrowings under our credit facilities, to fund our ongoing operating requirements. We expect that, to the extent necessary, we can raise additional funds from time to time through equity or debt financings in the public and private capital markets or the arrangement of additional credit facilities. However, there can be no assurances regarding the availability of any future financings or additional credit facilities or whether such financings or additional credit facilities can be made available on terms that are acceptable to us.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S.
GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in our financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. As of
June 30, 2017
, there were no significant changes to our critical accounting policies since the date our annual report on Form 10‑K for the year ended
December 31, 2016
was filed.
59
Table of Contents
ITEM 3.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
COMMODITY PRICE RISK
We are exposed to market risks related to the volatility in the price of crude oil, refined petroleum products (primarily gasoline and distillate), grain (primarily corn), soybean oil, and natural gas used in our operations. To reduce the impact of price volatility on our results of operations and cash flows, we use commodity derivative instruments, including swaps, futures, and options to manage the volatility of:
•
inventories and firm commitments to purchase inventories generally for amounts by which our current year inventory levels (determined on a LIFO basis) differ from our previous year-end LIFO inventory levels, and
•
forecasted feedstock and refined petroleum product purchases, refined petroleum product sales, natural gas purchases, and corn purchases to lock in the price of those forecasted transactions at existing market prices that we deem favorable.
We use the futures markets for the available liquidity, which provides greater flexibility in transacting our price risk activities. We use swaps primarily to manage our price exposure. We also enter into certain commodity derivative instruments for trading purposes to take advantage of existing market conditions related to future results of operations and cash flows.
Our positions in commodity derivative instruments are monitored and managed on a daily basis by our risk control group to ensure compliance with our stated risk management policy that has been approved by our board of directors.
The following sensitivity analysis includes all positions at the end of the reporting period with which we have market risk (in millions):
Derivative Instruments Held For
Non-Trading
Purposes
Trading
Purposes
June 30, 2017:
Gain (loss) in fair value resulting from:
10% increase in underlying commodity prices
$
(29
)
$
3
10% decrease in underlying commodity prices
29
(8
)
December 31, 2016:
Gain (loss) in fair value resulting from:
10% increase in underlying commodity prices
61
(22
)
10% decrease in underlying commodity prices
(61
)
11
See
Note 13
of Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for notional volumes associated with these derivative contracts as of
June 30, 2017
.
60
Table of Contents
COMPLIANCE PROGRAM PRICE RISK
We are exposed to market risk related to the volatility in the price of biofuel credits and GHG emission credits needed to comply with various governmental and regulatory programs. To manage these risks, we enter into contracts to purchase these credits when prices are deemed favorable. Some of these contracts are derivative instruments; however, we elect the normal purchase exception and do not record these contracts at their fair values. As of
June 30, 2017
, there was an immaterial amount of gain or loss in the fair value of derivative instruments that would result from a 10 percent increase or decrease in the underlying price of the contracts. See
Note 13
of Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion about these compliance programs.
INTEREST RATE RISK
The following table provides information about our debt instruments (dollars in millions), the fair values of which are sensitive to changes in interest rates. Principal cash flows and related weighted-average interest rates by expected maturity dates are presented.
June 30, 2017
Expected Maturity Dates
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
There-
after
Total (a)
Fair
Value
Fixed rate
$
—
$
—
$
750
$
850
$
—
$
6,224
$
7,824
$
8,949
Average interest rate
—
%
—
%
9.4
%
6.1
%
—
%
5.6
%
6.0
%
Floating rate (b)
$
103
$
5
$
6
$
35
$
6
$
25
$
180
$
180
Average interest rate
1.8
%
3.4
%
3.4
%
2.7
%
3.4
%
3.4
%
2.3
%
December 31, 2016
Expected Maturity Dates
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
There-
after
Total (a)
Fair
Value
Fixed rate
$
—
$
—
$
750
$
850
$
—
$
6,224
$
7,824
$
8,701
Average interest rate
—
%
—
%
9.4
%
6.1
%
—
%
5.6
%
6.0
%
Floating rate (b)
$
105
$
5
$
5
$
35
$
5
$
26
$
181
$
181
Average interest rate
1.4
%
3.4
%
3.4
%
2.5
%
3.4
%
3.4
%
2.1
%
________________________
(a)
Excludes unamortized discounts and debt issuance costs.
(b)
As of
June 30, 2017
and December 31, 2016, we had an interest rate swap associated with $50 million and $51 million, respectively, of our floating rate debt resulting in an effective interest rate of 3.85 percent as of each of those reporting dates. The fair value of the swap was immaterial for all periods presented.
FOREIGN CURRENCY RISK
As of
June 30, 2017
, we had commitments to purchase
$424 million
of U.S. dollars. Our market risk was minimal on these contracts, as all of them matured on or before
July 31, 2017
.
61
Table of Contents
ITEM 4.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a)
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.
Our management has evaluated, with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of the end of the period covered by this report, and has concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of
June 30, 2017
.
(b)
Changes in internal control over financial reporting.
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
62
Table of Contents
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The information below describes new proceedings or material developments in proceedings that we previously reported in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2016
.
Litigation
We incorporate by reference into this Item our disclosures made in Part I, Item 1 of this report included in
Note 5
of Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under the caption
“Litigation Matters.”
Environmental Enforcement Matters
While it is not possible to predict the outcome of the following environmental proceedings, if any one or more of them were decided against us, we believe that there would be no material effect on our financial position, results of operations, or liquidity. We are reporting these proceedings to comply with SEC regulations, which require us to disclose certain information about proceedings arising under federal, state, or local provisions regulating the discharge of materials into the environment or protecting the environment if we reasonably believe that such proceedings will result in monetary sanctions of $100,000 or more.
Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD)
(Benicia Refinery). We currently have multiple outstanding Violation Notices (VNs) issued by the BAAQMD from 2013 to the present. These VNs are for alleged reporting violations and excess emissions at our Benicia Refinery and asphalt plant. We are working with the BAAQMD to resolve these VNs.
63
Table of Contents
ITEM 1A.
RISK FACTORS
There have been no changes from the risk factors disclosed in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2016
.
ITEM 2.
UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
(a)
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities
. Not applicable.
(b)
Use of Proceeds
. Not applicable.
(c)
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
. The following table discloses purchases of shares of our common stock made by us or on our behalf during the
second quarter
of
2017
.
Period
Total Number
of Shares
Purchased
Average
Price Paid
per Share
Total Number of
Shares Not
Purchased as Part of
Publicly Announced
Plans or Programs (a)
Total Number of
Shares Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced Plans or
Programs
Approximate Dollar
Value of Shares that
May Yet Be Purchased
Under the Plans or
Programs (b)
April 2017
49,835
$
65.22
49,835
—
$2.2 billion
May 2017
2,728,943
$
64.72
9,645
2,719,298
$2.1 billion
June 2017
2,584,584
$
64.52
184
2,584,400
$1.9 billion
Total
5,363,362
$
64.63
59,664
5,303,698
$1.9 billion
___________________
(a)
The shares reported in this column represent purchases settled in the
second quarter
of
2017
relating to (i) our purchases of shares in open-market transactions to meet our obligations under stock-based compensation plans and (ii) our purchases of shares from our employees and non-employee directors in connection with the exercise of stock options, the vesting of restricted stock, and other stock compensation transactions in accordance with the terms of our stock-based compensation plans.
(b)
On
September 21, 2016
, we announced that our board of directors authorized our purchase of up to
$2.5 billion
of our outstanding common stock (the 2016 program) with no expiration date, which was in addition to the remaining amount available under our
$2.5 billion
program previously authorized on
July 13, 2015
(the 2015 program). During the first quarter of 2017, we completed our purchases under the 2015 program. As of
June 30, 2017
, we had
$1.9 billion
remaining available for purchase under the 2016 program.
64
Table of Contents
ITEM 6.
EXHIBITS
Exhibit
No.
Description
*31.01
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification (under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) of principal executive officer.
*31.02
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification (under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) of principal financial officer.
**32.01
Section 1350 Certifications (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002).
***101
Interactive Data Files
___________________
*
Filed herewith.
**
Furnished herewith.
***
Submitted electronically herewith.
65
Table of Contents
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION
(Registrant)
By:
/s/ Michael S. Ciskowski
Michael S. Ciskowski
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Duly Authorized Officer and Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer)
Date:
August 7, 2017
66