UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
________________
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2017
Commission File Number 1-8787
American International Group, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
13-2592361
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
175 Water Street, New York, New York
10038
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (212) 770-7000
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☑ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☑ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer ☑
Accelerated filer ☐
Non-accelerated filer ☐
Smaller reporting company ☐
Emerging growth company ☐
(Do not check if a
smaller reporting company)
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☑
As of May 1, 2017, there were 925,772,114 shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock.
ITEM 1
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
2
Note 1.
Basis of Presentation
7
Note 2.
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
8
Note 3.
Segment Information
11
Note 4.
Held-for-Sale Classification
13
Note 5.
Fair Value Measurements
14
Note 6.
Investments
27
Note 7.
Lending Activities
35
Note 8.
Variable Interest Entities
37
Note 9.
Derivatives and Hedge Accounting
38
Note 10.
Insurance Liabilities
42
Note 11.
Contingencies, Commitments and Guarantees
45
Note 12.
Equity
49
Note 13.
Earnings Per Share
52
Note 14.
Employee Benefits
53
Note 15.
Income Taxes
54
Note 16.
Information Provided in Connection with Outstanding Debt
56
Note 17.
Subsequent Events
60
ITEM 2
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
61
• Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information
• Use of Non-GAAP Measures
64
• Critical Accounting Estimates
66
• Executive Summary
67
• Consolidated Results of Operations
76
• Business Segment Operations
79
• Investments
105
• Insurance Reserves
122
• Liquidity and Capital Resources
129
• Enterprise Risk Management
141
• Regulatory Environment
146
• Glossary
147
• Acronyms
150
ITEM 3
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
151
ITEM 4
Controls and Procedures
Legal Proceedings
152
ITEM 1A
Risk Factors
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Mine Safety Disclosures
ITEM 6
Exhibits
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Part I – Financial Information
Item 1. | Financial Statements
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (unaudited)
March 31,
December 31,
(in millions, except for share data)
2017
2016
Assets:
Investments:
Fixed maturity securities:
Bonds available for sale, at fair value (amortized cost: 2017 - $220,629; 2016 - $232,241)
$
230,698
241,537
Other bond securities, at fair value (See Note 6)
13,605
13,998
Equity Securities:
Common and preferred stock available for sale, at fair value (cost: 2017 - $1,604; 2016 - $1,697)
2,099
2,078
Other common and preferred stock, at fair value (See Note 6)
500
482
Mortgage and other loans receivable, net of allowance (portion measured at fair value: 2017 - $11; 2016 - $11)
33,878
33,240
Other invested assets (portion measured at fair value: 2017 - $7,094; 2016 - $6,946)
23,652
24,538
Short-term investments (portion measured at fair value: 2017 - $2,453; 2016 - $3,341)
11,073
12,302
Total investments
315,505
328,175
Cash
1,918
1,868
Accrued investment income
2,386
2,495
Premiums and other receivables, net of allowance
11,130
10,465
Reinsurance assets, net of allowance
34,140
21,901
Deferred income taxes
20,881
21,332
Deferred policy acquisition costs
11,091
11,042
Other assets, including restricted cash of $213 in 2017 and $193 in 2016
(portion measured at fair value: 2017 - $1,247; 2016 - $1,809)
10,606
10,815
Separate account assets, at fair value
85,917
82,972
Assets held for sale
6,588
7,199
Total assets
500,162
498,264
Liabilities:
Liability for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses
76,050
77,077
Unearned premiums
19,840
19,634
Future policy benefits for life and accident and health insurance contracts
42,719
42,204
Policyholder contract deposits (portion measured at fair value: 2017 - $3,097; 2016 - $3,058)
132,639
132,216
Other policyholder funds (portion measured at fair value: 2017 - $5; 2016 - $5)
3,719
3,989
Other liabilities (portion measured at fair value: 2017 - $1,261; 2016 - $2,016)
28,093
26,296
Long-term debt (portion measured at fair value: 2017 - $3,151; 2016 - $3,428)
30,747
30,912
Separate account liabilities
Liabilities held for sale
5,771
6,106
Total liabilities
425,495
421,406
Contingencies, commitments and guarantees (see Note 11)
AIG shareholders’ equity:
Common stock, $2.50 par value; 5,000,000,000 shares authorized; shares issued: 2017 - 1,906,671,492 and
2016 - 1,906,671,492
4,766
Treasury stock, at cost; 2017 - 964,191,466 shares; 2016 - 911,335,651 shares of common stock
(44,915)
(41,471)
Additional paid-in capital
80,846
81,064
Retained earnings
29,591
28,711
Accumulated other comprehensive income
3,781
3,230
Total AIG shareholders’ equity
74,069
76,300
Non-redeemable noncontrolling interests
598
558
Total equity
74,667
76,858
Total liabilities and equity
See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) (unaudited)
Three Months Ended March 31,
(dollars in millions, except per share data)
Revenues:
Premiums
7,782
8,806
Policy fees
724
687
Net investment income
3,686
3,013
Net realized capital losses:
Total other-than-temporary impairments on available for sale securities
(39)
(209)
Portion of other-than-temporary impairments on available for sale
fixed maturity securities recognized in Other comprehensive income
(21)
Net other-than-temporary impairments on available for sale
securities recognized in net income (loss)
(60)
(202)
Other realized capital losses
(55)
(904)
Total net realized capital losses
(115)
(1,106)
Other income
555
379
Total revenues
12,632
11,779
Benefits, losses and expenses:
Policyholder benefits and losses incurred
6,047
6,387
Interest credited to policyholder account balances
910
950
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs
1,108
1,262
General operating and other expenses
2,443
3,003
Interest expense
298
306
(Gain) loss on extinguishment of debt
(1)
83
Net loss on sale of properties and divested businesses
100
Total benefits, losses and expenses
10,905
11,993
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income tax expense (benefit)
1,727
(214)
Income tax expense (benefit)
516
(58)
Income (loss) from continuing operations
1,211
(156)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income tax expense
-
(47)
Net income (loss)
(203)
Less:
Net income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to
noncontrolling interests
26
(20)
Net income (loss) attributable to AIG
1,185
(183)
Income per common share attributable to AIG:
Basic:
1.21
(0.12)
Loss from discontinued operations
(0.04)
(0.16)
Diluted:
1.18
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic
980,777,243
1,156,548,459
Diluted
1,005,315,030
Dividends declared per common share
0.320
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (unaudited)
(in millions)
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of fixed maturity securities on
which other-than-temporary credit impairments were recognized
114
(349)
Change in unrealized appreciation of all other investments
695
3,427
Change in foreign currency translation adjustments
(276)
(92)
Change in retirement plan liabilities adjustment
18
Other comprehensive income
551
2,988
Comprehensive income
1,762
2,785
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests
Comprehensive income attributable to AIG
1,736
2,805
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Equity (unaudited)
Non-
Accumulated
Total AIG
redeemable
Additional
Other
Share-
Common
Treasury
Paid-in
Retained
Comprehensive
holders'
controlling
Total
Stock
Capital
Earnings
Income
Interests
Three Months Ended March 31, 2017
Balance, beginning of year
Common stock issued under stock plans
139
(302)
(163)
Purchase of common stock
(3,585)
Net income attributable to AIG or
Dividends
(307)
Net increase due to acquisitions and consolidations
39
Contributions from noncontrolling interests
Distributions to noncontrolling interests
(37)
84
88
12
Balance, end of period
Three Months Ended March 31, 2016
(30,098)
81,510
30,943
2,537
89,658
552
90,210
(3,486)
Net loss attributable to AIG or
(363)
Other comprehensive income (loss)
Current and deferred income taxes
33
(2)
(97)
(98)
(100)
(33,584)
81,415
30,396
5,525
88,518
563
89,081
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net Income (loss)
47
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash used in operating activities:
Noncash revenues, expenses, gains and losses included in income (loss):
Net (gains) losses on sales of securities available for sale and other assets
(112)
204
Net loss on sale of divested businesses
(Gains) losses on extinguishment of debt
Unrealized (gains) losses in earnings - net
(226)
672
Equity in (income) loss from equity method investments, net of dividends or distributions
(119)
346
Depreciation and other amortization
1,012
1,197
Impairments of assets
173
450
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Insurance reserves
401
Premiums and other receivables and payables - net
(189)
(861)
Reinsurance assets and funds held under reinsurance treaties
(12,237)
(846)
Capitalization of deferred policy acquisition costs
(1,201)
(1,360)
Current and deferred income taxes - net
446
(109)
Other, net
383
(598)
Total adjustments
(11,570)
(812)
Net cash used in operating activities
(10,359)
(968)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Proceeds from (payments for)
Sales or distributions of:
Available for sale securities
15,307
5,710
Other securities
888
1,681
Other invested assets
1,826
1,649
Divested businesses, net
24
Maturities of fixed maturity securities available for sale
7,145
6,069
Principal payments received on and sales of mortgage and other loans receivable
1,543
1,133
Purchases of:
(10,028)
(12,454)
(185)
(173)
(783)
(743)
Mortgage and other loans receivable
(2,181)
(2,432)
Net change in restricted cash
(22)
(59)
Net change in short-term investments
1,250
(577)
(297)
581
Net cash provided by investing activities
14,487
385
Cash flows from financing activities:
Policyholder contract deposits
4,002
4,812
Policyholder contract withdrawals
(3,682)
(3,178)
Issuance of long-term debt
3,289
Repayments of long-term debt
(602)
(958)
Dividends paid
(25)
337
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
(4,048)
453
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
(82)
Net decrease in cash
(130)
Cash at beginning of year
1,629
Change in cash of businesses held for sale
Cash at end of period
1,499
Supplementary Disclosure of Condensed Consolidated Cash Flow Information
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest
354
362
Taxes
68
Non-cash investing/financing activities:
Interest credited to policyholder contract deposits included in financing activities
824
913
1. Basis of Presentation
American International Group, Inc. (AIG) is a leading global insurance organization serving customers in more than 80 countries and jurisdictions. AIG companies serve commercial and individual customers through one of the most extensive worldwide property‑casualty networks of any insurer. In addition, AIG companies are leading providers of life insurance and retirement services in the United States. AIG Common Stock, par value $2.50 per share (AIG Common Stock), is listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE: AIG) and the Tokyo Stock Exchange. Unless the context indicates otherwise, the terms “AIG,” “we,” “us” or “our” mean American International Group, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries and the term “AIG Parent” means American International Group, Inc. and not any of its consolidated subsidiaries.
These unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements do not include all disclosures that are normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP) and should be read in conjunction with the audited Consolidated Financial Statements and the related notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the 2016 Annual Report). The condensed consolidated financial information as of December 31, 2016 included herein has been derived from the audited Consolidated Financial Statements in the 2016 Annual Report.
Certain of our foreign subsidiaries included in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements report on different fiscal-period bases. The effect on our consolidated financial condition and results of operations of all material events occurring at these subsidiaries through the date of each of the periods presented in these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements has been considered for adjustment and/or disclosure. In the opinion of management, these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contain normal recurring adjustments, including eliminations of material intercompany accounts and transactions, necessary for a fair statement of the results presented herein.
Interim-period operating results may not be indicative of the operating results for a full year. We evaluated the need to recognize or disclose events that occurred subsequent to March 31, 2017 and prior to the issuance of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires the application of accounting policies that often involve a significant degree of judgment. Accounting policies that we believe are most dependent on the application of estimates and assumptions are considered our critical accounting estimates and are related to the determination of:
• income tax assets and liabilities, including recoverability of our net deferred tax asset and the predictability of future tax operating profitability of the character necessary to realize the net deferred tax asset;
• liability for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses (loss reserves);
• reinsurance assets;
• valuation of future policy benefit liabilities and timing and extent of loss recognition;
• valuation of liabilities for guaranteed benefit features of variable annuity products;
• estimated gross profits to value deferred policy acquisition costs for investment-oriented products;
• impairment charges, including other-than-temporary impairments on available for sale securities, impairments on other invested assets, including investments in life settlements, and goodwill impairment;
• liability for legal contingencies; and
• fair value measurements of certain financial assets and liabilities.
These accounting estimates require the use of assumptions about matters, some of which are highly uncertain at the time of estimation. To the extent actual experience differs from the assumptions used, our consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be materially affected.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Accounting Standards Adopted During 2017
Derivative Contract Novations
In March 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued an accounting standard that clarifies that a change in the counterparty (novation) to a derivative instrument that has been designated as a hedging instrument does not, in and of itself, require de-designation of that hedging relationship provided that all other hedge accounting criteria continue to be met.
We adopted the standard on its required effective date of January 1, 2017. The adoption of this standard did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Contingent Put and Call Options in Debt Instruments
In March 2016, the FASB issued an accounting standard that clarifies the requirements for assessing whether contingent call (put) options that can accelerate the payment of principal on debt instruments are clearly and closely related to their debt hosts. The standard requires an evaluation of embedded call (put) options solely on a four-step decision sequence that requires an entity to consider whether (1) the amount paid upon settlement is adjusted based on changes in an index, (2) the amount paid upon settlement is indexed to an underlying other than interest rates or credit risk, (3) the debt involves a substantial premium or discount and (4) the put or call option is contingently exercisable.
Simplifying the Transition to the Equity Method of Accounting
In March 2016, the FASB issued an accounting standard that eliminates the requirement that when an investment qualifies for use of the equity method as a result of an increase in the level of ownership interest or degree of influence, an investor must adjust the investment, results of operations, and retained earnings retroactively on a step-by-step basis as if the equity method had been in effect during all previous periods during which the investment had been held.
Interest Held through Related Parties that are under Common Control
In October 2016, the FASB issued an accounting standard that amends the consolidation analysis for a reporting entity that is the single decision maker of a variable interest entity (VIE). The new guidance will require the decision maker’s evaluation of its interests held through related parties that are under common control on a proportionate basis (rather than in their entirety) when determining whether it is the primary beneficiary of that VIE. The amendment does not change the characteristics of a primary beneficiary.
Future Application of Accounting Standards
Revenue Recognition
In May 2014, the FASB issued an accounting standard that supersedes most existing revenue recognition guidance. The standard excludes from its scope the accounting for insurance contracts, leases, financial instruments, and certain other agreements that are governed under other GAAP guidance, but could affect the revenue recognition for certain of our other activities.
The standard is effective on January 1, 2018 and may be applied retrospectively or through a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings at the date of adoption. Early adoption is permitted as of January 1, 2017, including interim periods. We are currently evaluating the impact to our revenue sources that are in scope of the standard. However, as the majority of our revenue sources are not in scope of the standard, we do not expect the adoption of the standard to have a material effect on our reported consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
In January 2016, the FASB issued an accounting standard that will require equity investments that do not follow the equity method of accounting or are not subject to consolidation to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in earnings, while financial liabilities for which fair value option accounting has been elected, changes in fair value due to instrument-specific credit risk will be presented separately in other comprehensive income. The standard allows the election to record equity investments without readily determinable fair values at cost, less impairment, adjusted for subsequent observable price changes with changes in the carrying value of the equity investments recorded in earnings. The standard also updates certain fair value disclosure requirements for financial instruments carried at amortized cost.
The standard is effective on January 1, 2018, with early adoption of certain provisions permitted. We are assessing the impact of the standard on our reported consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Leases
In February 2016, the FASB issued an accounting standard that will require lessees with lease terms of more than 12 months to recognize a right of use asset and a corresponding lease liability on their balance sheets. For income statement purposes, the FASB retained a dual model, requiring leases to be classified as either operating leases or finance leases.
The standard is effective on January 1, 2019, with early adoption permitted using a modified retrospective approach. We are assessing the impact of the standard on our reported consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. We are currently quantifying the expected gross up of our balance sheet for a right to use asset and a lease liability as required by the standard.
Financial Instruments - Credit Losses
In June 2016, the FASB issued an accounting standard that will change how entities account for credit losses for most financial assets, trade receivables and reinsurance receivables. The standard will replace the existing incurred loss impairment model with a new “current expected credit loss model” and will apply to financial assets subject to credit losses, those trade receivables measured at amortized cost, reinsurance receivables and certain off-balance sheet credit exposures. The impairment for available-for-sale debt securities, including purchase credit deteriorated securities, will be measured in a similar manner, except that losses will be recognized as allowances rather than reductions in the amortized cost of the securities. The standard will also require additional information to be disclosed in the footnotes.
The standard is effective on January 1, 2020, with early adoption permitted on January 1, 2019. We are assessing the impact of the standard on our reported consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows, but we expect an increase in our allowances for credit losses. The amount of the increase will be impacted by our portfolio composition and quality at the adoption date as well as economic conditions and forecasts at that time.
Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments
In August 2016, the FASB issued an accounting standard that addresses diversity in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. The amendments provide clarity on the treatment of eight specifically defined types of cash inflows and outflows. The standard is effective on January 1, 2018, with early adoption permitted as long as all amendments are included in the same period.
The standard addresses presentation in the statement of cash flows only and will have no effect on our reported consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other than Inventory
In October 2016, the FASB issued an accounting standard that will require an entity to recognize the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory when the transfer occurs, rather than when the asset is sold to a third party.
The standard is effective on January 1, 2018, with early adoption permitted. We are assessing the impact of the standard on our reported consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Restricted Cash
In November 2016, the FASB issued an accounting standard that provides guidance on the presentation of restricted cash in the Statement of Cash Flows. Entities will be required to explain the changes during a reporting period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows.
The standard is effective on January 1, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The standard addresses presentation of restricted cash in the Statement of Cash Flows only and will have no effect on our reported consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
Clarifying the Definition of a Business
In January 2017, the FASB issued an accounting standard that changes the definition of a business to assist entities with evaluating when a set of transferred assets and activities is a business. The new standard will require an entity to evaluate if substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired (or disposed of) is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar assets; if so, the set of transferred assets and activities is not a business. At a minimum, a set must include an input and a substantive process that together significantly contribute to the ability to create output.
The standard is effective on January 1, 2018, with early adoption permitted. We are assessing the impact of the standard on our reported consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Because the standard requires prospective adoption, the impact is dependent on future acquisitions, dispositions and those entities that we consolidate due to obtaining a controlling financial interest.
Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment
In January 2017, the FASB issued an accounting standard that eliminates the requirement to calculate the implied fair value of goodwill to measure a goodwill impairment charge. Instead, entities will record an impairment charge based on the excess of a reporting unit’s carrying amount over its fair value not to exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. An entity should also consider income tax effects from tax deductible goodwill on the carrying amount of the reporting unit when measuring the goodwill impairment loss, if applicable.
The standard is effective on January 1, 2020 with early adoption permitted on testing dates after January 1, 2017. We are currently reviewing the standard and assessing the impact of the standard on our reported consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets
In February 2017, the FASB issued an accounting standard that clarifies the scope and application of Other Income-Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets, to the sale or transfer of nonfinancial assets and in substance nonfinancial assets to noncustomers, including partial sales. The standard clarifies that a parent transferring its ownership interest in a consolidated subsidiary is within the scope of the accounting standard if substantially all of the fair value of the assets within that subsidiary are nonfinancial assets. The standard also clarifies that the derecognition of all businesses and nonprofit activities should be accounted for in accordance with the derecognition and deconsolidation guidance. The standard also eliminates the exception in the financial asset guidance for transfers of investments (including equity method investments) in real estate entities. An entity is required to apply the amendments in this update at the same time that it applies the amendments in revenues from contracts with customers.
The standard is effective on January 1, 2018 and may be applied retrospectively to each period presented or through a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings at the date of adoption (modified retrospective approach). Early adoption is permitted as of January 1, 2017, including interim periods. We are currently reviewing the standard and assessing the impact of the standard on our reported consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension and Postretirement Benefit Cost
In March 2017, the FASB issued an accounting standard that requires entities to report the service cost component of net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs in the same line item as other compensation costs arising from services rendered by the pertinent employees during the period. The other components of net periodic benefit costs are required to be separately presented in the income statement. The amendments also allow only the service cost component to be eligible for capitalization when applicable.
The standard is effective on January 1, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The amendments should be applied retrospectively for the presentation of the service cost and other components, and prospectively for the capitalization of the service cost component. The standard addresses presentation of net periodic benefit costs in the income statement and will have no effect on our reported consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities
In March 2017, the FASB issued an accounting standard that shortens the amortization period for certain callable debt securities held at a premium. Specifically, the standard requires the premium to be amortized to the earliest call date. The standard does not require an accounting change for securities held at a discount; the discount continues to be amortized to maturity.
The standard is effective January 1, 2018, with early adoption permitted as of January 1, 2017, including for interim periods. We are currently reviewing the standard and assessing the impact of the standard on our reported consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
3. Segment Information
We report our results of operations consistent with the manner in which our chief operating decision makers review the business to assess performance and allocate resources.
We report our results of operations as follows:
· Commercial Insurance business is presented as two operating segments:
- Liability and Financial Lines
- Property and Special Risks
· Consumer Insurance business is presented as four operating segments:
- Individual Retirement
- Group Retirement
- Life Insurance
- Personal Insurance
· The Other Operations category consists of:
- Institutional Markets
- Income from assets held by AIG Parent and other corporate subsidiaries
- General operating expenses not attributable to specific reporting segments
- Interest expense
- United Guaranty — The sale of this business was completed on December 31, 2016
- Fuji Life — On November 14, 2016, we entered into an agreement to sell our Japan life insurance business, AIG Fuji Life Insurance Company, Ltd. (Fuji Life), to FWD Group, the insurance arm of Pacific Century Group. The sale of this business was completed on April 30, 2017.
· The Legacy Portfolio segment consists of:
- Legacy Property and Casualty Run-Off Insurance Lines
- Legacy Life Insurance Run-Off Lines
- Legacy Investments
We evaluate segment performance based on operating revenues and pre-tax operating income (loss). Operating revenues and pre-tax operating income (loss) is derived by excluding certain items from total revenues and net income (loss) attributable to AIG, respectively. See the table below for the items excluded from operating revenues and pre-tax operating income (loss).
The following table presents AIG’s continuing operations by operating segment:
Pre-Tax
Operating
Revenues
Income (Loss)
Commercial Insurance
Liability and Financial Lines
2,848
574
3,311
569
Property and Special Risks
1,835
275
1,987
93
Total Commercial Insurance
4,683
849
5,298
662
Consumer Insurance
Individual Retirement
1,373
539
1,493
302
Group Retirement
718
243
629
191
Life Insurance
1,013
953
1
Personal Insurance
2,838
212
2,816
210
Total Consumer Insurance
5,942
1,048
5,891
704
Other Operations
1,090
(246)
998
(239)
Legacy Portfolio
1,084
342
681
AIG Consolidation and elimination
(64)
48
(131)
20
Total AIG Consolidated revenues and pre-tax operating income
12,735
2,041
12,737
945
Reconciling Items from revenues and pre-tax operating income to
revenues and pre-tax income (loss):
Changes in fair value of securities used to hedge guaranteed
living benefits
133
Changes in benefit reserves and DAC, VOBA and SIA related to
net realized capital gains
40
(Unfavorable) favorable prior year development and related amortization
changes ceded under retroactive reinsurance agreements
(14)
Gain (Loss) on extinguishment of debt
(83)
Net realized capital losses
Loss from divested businesses
Non-operating litigation reserves and settlements
10
6
34
31
Net loss reserve discount benefit (charge)
25
9
Restructuring and other costs
(181)
(188)
(9)
(19)
Revenues and Pre-tax income (loss)
4. Held-For-Sale Classification
Held-For-Sale Classification
We report a business as held-for-sale when management has approved the sale or received approval to sell the business and is committed to a formal plan, the business is available for immediate sale, the business is being actively marketed, the sale is anticipated to occur during the next 12 months and certain other specified criteria are met. A business classified as held-for-sale is recorded at the lower of its carrying amount or estimated fair value less cost to sell. If the carrying amount of the business exceeds its estimated fair value, a loss is recognized.
Assets and liabilities related to the businesses classified as held-for-sale are separately reported in our Consolidated Balance Sheets beginning in the period in which the business is classified as held-for-sale.
At March 31, 2017, the following businesses were reported as held-for-sale:
United Guaranty Asia
On August 15, 2016, we entered into a definitive agreement to sell our 100 percent interest in United Guaranty Corporation (UGC) and certain related affiliates to Arch Capital Group Ltd. (Arch). This transaction closed on December 31, 2016 and we received proceeds of approximately $3.3 billion, consisting of $2.2 billion of cash, and approximately $1.1 billion of newly issued Arch convertible non-voting common-equivalent preferred stock. We also received $261 million in pre-closing dividends from UGC in the fourth quarter of 2016. However, due to pending regulatory approvals, United Guaranty Asia was not included in the December 31, 2016 closing and $40 million of cash consideration was retained by Arch. The closing with respect to United Guaranty Asia is expected to occur prior to year-end 2017, at which time AIG will receive the remaining consideration.
Sale of Certain Insurance Subsidiary Operations to Fairfax
On October 18, 2016, we entered into agreements to sell certain insurance operations to Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited (Fairfax). The agreements include the sale of our subsidiary operations in Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Uruguay and Venezuela, as well as insurance operations in Turkey. Fairfax will also acquire renewal rights for the portfolios of local business written by our operations in Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania and Slovakia, and assume certain of our operating assets and employees. Total cash consideration to us is expected to be approximately $234 million. The closing of the sales in Czech Republic, Hungary and Slovakia occurred on April 30, 2017, and the sale of the operations in Turkey closed on May 2, 2017. The remaining sales are subject to obtaining the relevant regulatory approvals and other customary closing conditions.
AIG Fuji Life Insurance
On November 14, 2016, we entered into an agreement to sell Fuji Life to FWD Group, the insurance arm of Pacific Century Group. The transaction closed on April 30, 2017.
The following table summarizes the components of assets and liabilities held-for-sale on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016:
Fixed maturity securities
5,438
6,045
Equity securities
149
Mortgage and other loans receivable, net
121
137
244
Short-term investments
181
130
81
22
21
393
351
422
471
Other assets
264
273
Assets of businesses held for sale
7,193
7,720
Less: Loss Accrual
(605)
(521)
Total assets held for sale
489
402
333
297
4,140
4,579
Other policyholder funds
327
378
Long-term debt
108
Other liabilities
374
Total liabilities held for sale
5. Fair Value Measurements
Fair Value Measurements on a Recurring Basis
Assets and liabilities recorded at fair value in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets are measured and classified in accordance with a fair value hierarchy consisting of three “levels” based on the observability of valuation inputs:
• Level 1: Fair value measurements based on quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that we have the ability to access for identical assets or liabilities. Market price data generally is obtained from exchange or dealer markets. We do not adjust the quoted price for such instruments.
• Level 2: Fair value measurements based on inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, and inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, such as interest rates and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals.
• Level 3: Fair value measurements based on valuation techniques that use significant inputs that are unobservable. Both observable and unobservable inputs may be used to determine the fair values of positions classified in Level 3. The circumstances for using these measurements include those in which there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability. Therefore, we must make certain assumptions about the inputs a hypothetical market participant would use to value that asset or liability.
In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety.
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The following table presents information about assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis and indicates the level of the fair value measurement based on the observability of the inputs used:
March 31, 2017
Counterparty
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Netting(b)
Collateral
Bonds available for sale:
U.S. government and government sponsored entities
51
2,311
2,362
Obligations of states, municipalities and political subdivisions
17,662
19,703
Non-U.S. governments
183
14,108
16
14,307
Corporate debt
128,251
1,079
129,330
RMBS
18,800
16,487
35,287
CMBS
12,606
1,003
13,609
CDO/ABS
8,345
7,755
16,100
Total bonds available for sale
234
202,083
28,381
Other bond securities:
2,931
50
1,755
1,773
469
1,502
1,971
65
536
836
5,508
6,344
Total other bond securities
6,512
7,093
Equity securities available for sale:
Common stock
978
986
Preferred stock
825
Mutual funds
286
288
Total equity securities available for sale
2,089
Other equity securities
Other invested assets(a)
404
180
584
Derivative assets:
Interest rate contracts
2,349
Foreign exchange contracts
1,111
Equity contracts
274
111
62
447
Credit contracts
Other contracts
4
17
Counterparty netting and cash collateral
(1,269)
(1,414)
(2,683)
Total derivative assets
3,575
1,247
2,110
343
2,453
Separate account assets
80,323
5,594
85,530
218,513
35,754
337,114
3,072
3,097
5
Derivative liabilities:
2,481
32
2,515
1,099
1,105
317
(1,461)
(2,730)
Total derivative liabilities
3,590
361
1,261
3,093
58
3,151
6,708
3,491
7,514
December 31, 2016
63
1,929
1,992
22,732
2,040
24,772
14,466
14,535
131,047
132,180
20,468
16,906
37,374
12,231
14,271
8,578
7,835
16,413
115
211,451
29,971
2,939
1,772
420
1,605
2,025
448
155
603
905
5,703
6,608
6,518
7,480
1,056
1,065
752
260
261
2,068
205
2,328
1,320
188
59
305
(1,265)
(903)
(2,168)
3,713
1,809
2,660
3,341
77,318
5,654
82,831
228,028
37,742
346,433
3,033
3,058
3,039
3,077
1,358
1,369
19
331
(1,521)
(2,786)
4,405
2,016
3,357
71
3,428
7,787
3,489
8,507
(a) Excludes investments that are measured at fair value using the net asset value (NAV) per share (or its equivalent), which totaled $6.5 billion and $6.7 billion as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.
(b) Represents netting of derivative exposures covered by qualifying master netting agreements.
Transfers of Level 1 and Level 2 Assets and Liabilities
Our policy is to record transfers of assets and liabilities between Level 1 and Level 2 at their fair values as of the end of each reporting period, consistent with the date of the determination of fair value. Assets are transferred out of Level 1 when they are no longer transacted with sufficient frequency and volume in an active market. Conversely, assets are transferred from Level 2 to Level 1 when transaction volume and frequency are indicative of an active market.
During the three-month periods ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, we transferred $53 million and $83 million, respectively, of securities issued by Non-U.S. government entities from Level 1 to Level 2, as they are no longer considered actively traded. For similar reasons, during the three-month period ended March 31, 2017, we transferred $63 million of securities issued by the U.S. government and government sponsored entities from Level 1 to Level 2; there were no such transfers during the three-month period ended March 31, 2016. We had no material transfers from Level 2 to Level 1 during the three-month periods ended March 31, 2017 and 2016.
Changes in Level 3 Recurring Fair Value Measurements
The following tables present changes during the three-month periods ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 in Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, and the realized and unrealized gains (losses) related to the Level 3 assets and liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at March 31, 2017 and 2016:
Net
Changes in
Realized and
Purchases,
Unrealized Gains
Unrealized
Sales,
Reclassified
(Losses) Included
Fair Value
Gains (Losses)
Issues and
Gross
to Assets
in Income on
Beginning
Included
Settlements,
Transfers
Divested
Held for
End
Instruments Held
of Period
in Income
in
out
Businesses
Sale
at End of Period
Obligations of states,
municipalities and
political subdivisions
(4)
(18)
(3)
(13)
136
(170)
289
(858)
(348)
(699)
(102)
(32)
197
(1,301)
144
(928)
55
(125)
(33)
(17)
(73)
(368)
70
229
(510)
(106)
96
(5)
37,666
526
192
(1,820)
(1,035)
35,673
(Gains) Losses
to Liabilities
at End of
(45)
Derivative liabilities, net:
3
(11)
(62)
Commodity contracts
329
(15)
315
Total derivative liabilities, net(a)
309
(48)
280
Long-term debt(b)
3,413
(81)
78
3,410
2,124
2,196
30
1,370
(24)
29
(473)
1,024
16,537
245
(420)
(233)
16,162
2,585
(88)
(90)
2,368
6,169
(50)
438
23
6,592
28,817
300
(526)
167
177
(563)
28,372
1,581
1,513
193
170
7,055
(133)
(411)
6,576
(306)
8,846
(171)
(445)
8,277
(352)
15
332
(54)
263
38,020
(531)
(299)
242
(635)
36,938
2,289
845
117
3,251
(6)
(51)
505
490
556
57
617
(49)
184
3,028
904
120
4,052
(29)
(a) Total Level 3 derivative exposures have been netted in these tables for presentation purposes only.
(b) Includes guaranteed investment agreements (GIAs), notes, bonds, loans and mortgages payable.
Net realized and unrealized gains and losses included in income related to Level 3 assets and liabilities shown above are reported in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income as follows:
Net Realized
Investment
Bonds available for sale
Other bond securities
75
148
(34)
(137)
(38)
Derivative liabilities, net
(7)
(41)
The following table presents the gross components of purchases, sales, issues and settlements, net, shown above, for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 related to Level 3 assets and liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets:
Sales, Issues and
Purchases
Sales
Settlements
Settlements, Net(a)
339
(244)
(953)
(67)
(320)
428
(317)
(1,412)
98
(167)
(56)
(178)
(430)
Equity securities available for sale
535
(495)
(1,860)
503
(678)
102
(31)
(152)
(101)
1,203
(89)
(947)
(26)
(71)
(402)
124
(114)
(455)
(30)
1,350
(1,446)
(8)
(a) There were no issuances during the three-month periods ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
(b) Includes GIAs, notes, bonds, loans and mortgages payable.
Both observable and unobservable inputs may be used to determine the fair values of positions classified in Level 3 in the tables above. As a result, the unrealized gains (losses) on instruments held at March 31, 2017 and 2016 may include changes in fair value that were attributable to both observable (e.g., changes in market interest rates) and unobservable inputs (e.g., changes in unobservable long-dated volatilities).
Transfers of Level 3 Assets and Liabilities
We record transfers of assets and liabilities into or out of Level 3 classification at their fair values as of the end of each reporting period, consistent with the date of the determination of fair value. The Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) included in income or Other comprehensive income (loss) as shown in the table above excluded $8 million and $13 million of net losses related to assets and liabilities transferred into Level 3 during the three-month periods ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and included $1 million of net gains and $45 million of net losses related to assets and liabilities transferred out of Level 3 during the three-month periods ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Transfers of Level 3 Assets
During the three-month periods ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, transfers into Level 3 assets primarily included certain investments in private placement corporate debt, CDO/ABS and RMBS. Transfers of private placement corporate debt and certain ABS into Level 3 assets were primarily the result of limited market pricing information that required us to determine fair value for these securities based on inputs that are adjusted to better reflect our own assumptions regarding the characteristics of a specific security or associated market liquidity. The transfers of investments in RMBS and CDO and certain ABS into Level 3 assets were due to decreases in market transparency and liquidity for individual security types.
During the three-month periods ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, transfers out of Level 3 assets primarily included private placement and other corporate debt, CMBS, RMBS, CDO/ABS and certain investments in municipal securities. Transfers of certain investments municipal securities, corporate debt, RMBS, CMBS and CDO/ABS out of Level 3 assets were based on consideration of market liquidity as well as related transparency of pricing and associated observable inputs for these investments. Transfers of certain investments in private placement corporate debt and certain ABS out of Level 3 assets were primarily the result of using observable pricing information that reflects the fair value of those securities without the need for adjustment based on our own assumptions regarding the characteristics of a specific security or the current liquidity in the market.
Transfers of Level 3 Liabilities
There were no significant transfers of derivative or other liabilities into or out of Level 3 for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2017 and 2016.
Quantitative Information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements
The table below presents information about the significant unobservable inputs used for recurring fair value measurements for certain Level 3 instruments, and includes only those instruments for which information about the inputs is reasonably available to us, such as data from independent third-party valuation service providers and from internal valuation models. Because input information from third-parties with respect to certain Level 3 instruments (primarily CDO/ABS) may not be reasonably available to us, balances shown below may not equal total amounts reported for such Level 3 assets and liabilities:
Fair Value at
Valuation
Range
Technique
Unobservable Input(b)
(Weighted Average)
Obligations of states, municipalities
and political subdivisions
1,263
Discounted cash flow
Yield
3.97% - 5.06% (4.51%)
3.16% - 6.10% (4.63%)
RMBS(a)
16,780
Constant prepayment rate
1.81% - 9.65% (5.73%)
Loss severity
48.00% - 80.38% (64.19%)
Constant default rate
3.20% - 8.38% (5.79%)
3.17% - 5.73% (4.45%)
CDO/ABS(a)
4,699
3.38% - 5.68% (4.53%)
615
2.32% - 8.45% (5.38%)
Embedded derivatives within
Policyholder contract deposits:
Guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefits (GMWB)
1,671
Equity volatility
8.00% - 50.00%
Base lapse rate
0.50% - 20.00%
Dynamic lapse multiplier
30.00% - 170.00%
Mortality multiplier(c)
42.00% - 161.00%
Utilization
100.00%
Equity / interest-rate correlation
20.00% - 40.00%
Index Annuities
964
Lapse rate
1.00% - 66.00%
101.00% - 103.00%
Indexed Life
414
2.00% to 19.00%
Mortality rate
0.00% to 40.00%
1,248
4.12% - 4.91% (4.52%)
498
3.41% - 6.38% (4.90%)
17,412
3.95% - 6.54% (5.25%)
47.51% - 80.98% (64.24%)
3.28% - 8.64% (5.96%)
3.28% - 5.87% (4.57%)
4,368
3.67% - 5.85% (4.76%)
1,511
0.48% - 10.21% (5.34%)
GMWB
1,777
13.00% - 50.00%
859
381
2.00% - 19.00%
0.00% - 40.00%
(a) Information received from third-party valuation service providers. The ranges of the unobservable inputs for constant prepayment rate, loss severity and constant default rate relate to each of the individual underlying mortgage loans that comprise the entire portfolio of securities in the RMBS and CDO securitization vehicles and not necessarily to the securitization vehicle bonds (tranches) purchased by us. The ranges of these inputs do not directly correlate to changes in the fair values of the tranches purchased by us, because there are other factors relevant to the fair values of specific tranches owned by us including, but not limited to, purchase price, position in the waterfall, senior versus subordinated position and attachment points.
(b) Represents discount rates, estimates and assumptions that we believe would be used by market participants when valuing these assets and liabilities.
(c) Mortality inputs are shown as multipliers of the 2012 Individual Annuity Mortality Basic table for GMWB, and the 1975-1980 Modified Basic Table for index annuities.
The ranges of reported inputs for Obligations of states, municipalities and political subdivisions, Corporate debt, RMBS, CDO/ABS, and CMBS valued using a discounted cash flow technique consist of one standard deviation in either direction from the value‑weighted average. The preceding table does not give effect to our risk management practices that might offset risks inherent in these Level 3 assets and liabilities.
Sensitivity to Changes in Unobservable Inputs
We consider unobservable inputs to be those for which market data is not available and that are developed using the best information available to us about the assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability. Relevant inputs vary depending on the nature of the instrument being measured at fair value. The following paragraphs provide a general description of sensitivities of significant unobservable inputs along with interrelationships between and among the significant unobservable inputs and their impact on the fair value measurements. The effect of a change in a particular assumption in the sensitivity analysis below is considered independently of changes in any other assumptions. In practice, simultaneous changes in assumptions may not always have a linear effect on the inputs discussed below. Interrelationships may also exist between observable and unobservable inputs. Such relationships have not been included in the discussion below. For each of the individual relationships described below, the inverse relationship would also generally apply.
Obligations of States, Municipalities and Political Subdivisions
The significant unobservable input used in the fair value measurement of certain investments in obligations of states, municipalities and political subdivisions is yield. In general, increases in the yield would decrease the fair value of investments in obligations of states, municipalities and political subdivisions.
Corporate Debt
Corporate debt securities included in Level 3 are primarily private placement issuances that are not traded in active markets or that are subject to transfer restrictions. Fair value measurements consider illiquidity and non‑transferability. When observable price quotations are not available, fair value is determined based on discounted cash flow models using discount rates based on credit spreads, yields or price levels of publicly‑traded debt of the issuer or other comparable securities, considering illiquidity and structure. The significant unobservable input used in the fair value measurement of corporate debt is the yield. The yield is affected by the market movements in credit spreads and U.S. Treasury yields. In addition, the migration in credit quality of a given security generally has a corresponding effect on the fair value measurement of the security. For example, a downward migration of credit quality would increase spreads. Holding U.S. Treasury rates constant, an increase in corporate credit spreads would decrease the fair value of corporate debt.
RMBS and CDO/ABS
The significant unobservable inputs used in fair value measurements of RMBS and certain CDO/ABS valued by third‑party valuation service providers are constant prepayment rates (CPR), loss severity, constant default rates (CDR), and yield. A change in the assumptions used for the probability of default will generally be accompanied by a corresponding change in the assumption used for the loss severity and an inverse change in the assumption used for prepayment rates. In general, increases in CPR, loss severity, CDR, and yield, in isolation, would result in a decrease in the fair value measurement. Changes in fair value based on variations in assumptions generally cannot be extrapolated because the relationship between the directional change of each input is not usually linear.
The significant unobservable input used in fair value measurements for CMBS is the yield. Prepayment assumptions for each mortgage pool are factored into the yield. CMBS generally feature a lower degree of prepayment risk than RMBS because commercial mortgages generally contain a penalty for prepayment. In general, increases in the yield would decrease the fair value of CMBS.
Embedded derivatives within Policyholder contract deposits
Embedded derivatives reported within Policyholder contract deposits include guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefits (GMWB) within variable annuity products and interest crediting rates based on market indices within index annuities, indexed life and guaranteed investment contracts (GICs). For any given contract, assumptions for unobservable inputs vary throughout the period over which cash flows are projected for purposes of valuing the embedded derivative. The following unobservable inputs are used for valuing embedded derivatives measured at fair value:
• Long-term equity volatilities represent equity volatility beyond the period for which observable equity volatilities are available. Increases in assumed volatility will generally increase the fair value of both the projected cash flows from rider fees as well as the projected cash flows related to benefit payments. Therefore, the net change in the fair value of the liability may be either a decrease or an increase, depending on the relative changes in projected rider fees and projected benefit payments.
• Equity / interest rate correlation estimates the relationship between changes in equity returns and interest rates in the economic scenario generator used to value our GMWB embedded derivatives. In general, a higher positive correlation assumes that equity markets and interest rates move in a more correlated fashion, which generally increases the fair value of the liability.
• Base lapse rate assumptions are determined by company experience and are adjusted at the contract level using a dynamic lapse function, which reduces the base lapse rate when the contract is in-the-money (when the contract holder’s guaranteed value, as estimated by the company, is worth more than their underlying account value). Lapse rates are also generally assumed to be lower in periods when a surrender charge applies. Increases in assumed lapse rates will generally decrease the fair value of the liability, as fewer policyholders would persist to collect guaranteed withdrawal amounts, but in certain scenarios, increases in assumed lapse rates may increase the fair value of the liability.
• Mortality rate assumptions, which vary by age and gender, are based on company experience and include a mortality improvement assumption. Increases in assumed mortality rates will decrease the fair value of the liability, while lower mortality rate assumptions will generally increase the fair value of the liability, because guaranteed payments will be made for a longer period of time.
• Utilization assumptions estimate the timing when policyholders with a GMWB will elect to utilize their benefit and begin taking withdrawals. The assumptions may vary by the type of guarantee, tax-qualified status, the contract’s withdrawal history and the age of the policyholder. Utilization assumptions are based on company experience, which includes partial withdrawal behavior. Increases in assumed utilization rates will generally increase the fair value of the liability.
Investments in Certain Entities Carried at Fair Value Using Net Asset Value Per Share
The following table includes information related to our investments in certain other invested assets, including private equity funds, hedge funds and other alternative investments that calculate net asset value per share (or its equivalent). For these investments, which are measured at fair value on a recurring basis, we use the net asset value per share to measure fair value.
Using NAV
Per Share (or
Unfunded
Investment Category Includes
its equivalent)
Commitments
Investment Category
Private equity funds:
Leveraged buyout
Debt and/or equity investments made as part of a transaction in which assets of mature companies are acquired from the current shareholders, typically with the use of financial leverage
1,355
751
1,424
750
Real Estate /
Infrastructure
Investments in real estate properties and infrastructure positions, including power plants and other energy generating facilities
248
196
258
208
Venture capital
Early-stage, high-potential, growth companies expected to generate a return through an eventual realization event, such as an initial public offering or sale of the company
126
36
Distressed
Securities of companies that are in default, under bankruptcy protection, or troubled
123
43
44
Includes multi-strategy, mezzanine and other strategies
265
312
215
Total private equity funds
2,195
1,291
2,254
Hedge funds:
Event-driven
Securities of companies undergoing material structural changes, including mergers, acquisitions and other reorganizations
1,406
1,453
Long-short
Securities that the manager believes are undervalued, with corresponding short positions to hedge market risk
1,391
1,429
Macro
Investments that take long and short positions in financial instruments based on a top-down view of certain economic and capital market conditions
996
992
Securities of companies that are in default, under bankruptcy protection or troubled
324
416
Emerging markets
Investments in the financial markets of developing countries
Includes investments held in funds that are less liquid, as well as other strategies which allow for broader allocation between public and private investments
198
Total hedge funds
4,315
4,487
6,510
6,741
1,279
Private equity fund investments included above are not redeemable, because distributions from the funds will be received when underlying investments of the funds are liquidated. Private equity funds are generally expected to have 10-year lives at their inception, but these lives may be extended at the fund manager’s discretion, typically in one or two-year increments. At March 31, 2017, assuming average original expected lives of 10 years for the funds, 70 percent of the total fair value using net asset value per share (or its equivalent) presented above would have expected remaining lives of three years or less, 17 percent between four and six years and 13 percent between seven and 10 years.
The hedge fund investments included above, which are carried at fair value, are generally redeemable monthly (19 percent), quarterly (44 percent), semi-annually (11 percent) and annually (26 percent), with redemption notices ranging from one day to 180 days. At March 31, 2017, investments representing approximately 67 percent of the total fair value of these hedge fund investments had partial contractual redemption restrictions. These partial redemption restrictions are generally related to one or more investments held in the hedge funds that the fund manager deemed to be illiquid. The majority of these contractual restrictions, which may have been put in place at the fund’s inception or thereafter, have pre-defined end dates. The majority of these restrictions are generally expected to be lifted by the end of 2017.
Fair Value Option
The following table presents the gains or losses recorded related to the eligible instruments for which we elected the fair value option:
Gain (Loss)
Bond and equity securities
349
Alternative investments(a)
(247)
Other, including Short-term investments
(176)
Total gain (loss)
515
(373)
(a) Includes certain hedge funds, private equity funds and other investment partnerships.
(b) Includes GIAs, notes, bonds and mortgages payable.
We recognized gains of $3 million and $5 million during the three-month periods ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, attributable to the observable effect of changes in credit spreads on our own liabilities for which the fair value option was elected. We calculate the effect of these credit spread changes using discounted cash flow techniques that incorporate current market interest rates, our observable credit spreads on these liabilities and other factors that mitigate the risk of nonperformance such as cash collateral posted.
The following table presents the difference between fair values and the aggregate contractual principal amounts of mortgage and other loans receivable and long-term debt for which the fair value option was elected:
Outstanding
Principal Amount
Difference
Long-term debt*
2,370
781
2,628
800
* Includes GIAs, notes, bonds, loans and mortgages payable.
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS ON A NON-RECURRING BASIS
The following table presents assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis at the time of impairment and the related impairment charges recorded during the periods presented:
Assets at Fair Value
Impairment Charges
Non-Recurring Basis
Other investments
Investments in life settlements
41
157
Other assets*
159
364
736
1,102
* Impairments in 2017 included $35 million related to assets of $179 million that were reclassified to assets held for sale.
FAIR VALUE INFORMATION ABOUT FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS NOT MEASURED AT FAIR VALUE
The following table presents the carrying amounts and estimated fair values of our financial instruments not measured at fair value and indicates the level in the fair value hierarchy of the estimated fair value measurement based on the observability of the inputs used:
Estimated Fair Value
Carrying
Value
160
34,206
34,366
33,867
1,716
2,333
2,732
8,620
Policyholder contract deposits associated
with investment-type contracts
350
121,989
122,339
113,278
4,262
22,891
3,423
26,314
27,596
161
33,575
33,736
33,229
955
2,053
3,008
3,474
8,961
382
121,742
122,124
112,705
4,196
23,117
3,333
26,450
27,484
6. Investments
Securities Available for Sale
The following table presents the amortized cost or cost and fair value of our available for sale securities:
Other-Than-
Amortized
Temporary
Cost or
Fair
Impairments
Cost
Gains
Losses
in AOCI(a)
2,236
(23)
18,877
967
(141)
13,688
757
(138)
123,469
7,290
(1,429)
Mortgage-backed, asset-backed and collateralized:
33,042
2,648
(403)
1,317
13,374
392
(157)
15,943
(148)
Total mortgage-backed, asset-backed and collateralized
62,359
3,345
(708)
64,996
1,405
Total bonds available for sale(b)
220,629
12,508
(2,439)
1,407
605
386
749
250
1,604
501
222,233
13,009
(2,445)
232,797
1,870
24,025
1,001
(254)
14,018
773
(256)
126,648
7,271
(1,739)
35,311
2,541
(478)
1,212
14,054
409
(192)
16,315
278
(180)
65,680
3,228
(850)
68,058
1,296
232,241
12,421
(3,125)
1,265
708
369
(12)
748
241
1,697
396
233,938
12,817
(3,140)
243,615
(a) Represents the amount of other-than-temporary impairments recognized in Accumulated other comprehensive income. Amount includes unrealized gains and losses on impaired securities relating to changes in the fair value of such securities subsequent to the impairment measurement date.
(b) At March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, bonds available for sale held by us that were below investment grade or not rated totaled $32.8 billion and $33.6 billion, respectively.
Securities Available for Sale in a Loss Position
The following table summarizes the fair value and gross unrealized losses on our available for sale securities, aggregated by major investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position:
Less than 12 Months
12 Months or More
892
Obligations of states, municipalities and political
subdivisions
3,115
239
3,354
2,983
463
3,446
138
24,721
865
4,832
564
29,553
7,752
232
3,363
171
11,115
403
4,248
4,581
3,467
1,593
5,060
47,178
10,823
937
58,001
2,439
73
47,236
1,506
10,843
939
58,079
2,445
720
5,814
221
231
254
3,865
162
94
4,354
256
28,184
6,080
726
34,264
1,739
8,794
252
4,045
226
12,839
478
4,469
479
4,948
5,362
1,961
7,323
57,208
1,928
13,285
70,493
3,125
125
189
57,397
1,943
70,682
3,140
At March 31, 2017, we held 8,235 and 63 individual fixed maturity and equity securities, respectively, that were in an unrealized loss position, of which 1,478 and six individual fixed maturity and equity securities, respectively, were in a continuous unrealized loss position for 12 months or more. We did not recognize the unrealized losses in earnings on these fixed maturity securities at March 31, 2017 because we neither intend to sell the securities nor do we believe that it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell these securities before recovery of their amortized cost basis. For fixed maturity securities with significant declines, we performed fundamental credit analyses on a security-by-security basis, which included consideration of credit enhancements, expected defaults on underlying collateral, review of relevant industry analyst reports and forecasts and other available market data.
Contractual Maturities of Fixed Maturity Securities Available for Sale
The following table presents the amortized cost and fair value of fixed maturity securities available for sale by contractual maturity:
Total Fixed Maturity Securities
Fixed Maturity Securities in a Loss
Available for Sale
Position Available for Sale
Amortized Cost
Due in one year or less
7,064
7,266
572
566
Due after one year through five years
47,682
50,305
5,132
5,016
Due after five years through ten years
41,861
42,976
12,546
12,036
Due after ten years
61,663
65,155
20,726
19,627
Mortgage-backed, asset-backed and collateralized
21,464
20,756
60,440
7,796
7,994
604
49,200
51,958
6,002
5,841
43,308
44,226
16,045
15,332
66,257
69,301
25,007
23,629
25,960
25,110
73,618
Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because certain borrowers have the right to call or prepay certain obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.
The following table presents the gross realized gains and gross realized losses from sales or maturities of our available for sale securities:
Realized
178
187
549
194
219
557
For the three-month periods ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, the aggregate fair value of available for sale securities sold was $15.8 billion and $6.1 billion, respectively, which resulted in net realized capital gains (losses) of $156 million and $(338) million, respectively.
Other Securities Measured at Fair Value
The following table presents the fair value of other securities measured at fair value based on our election of the fair value option:
Percent
of Total
%
CDO/ABS and other collateralized*
8,851
9,236
Total fixed maturity securities
97
14,105
14,480
* Includes $353 million and $421 million of U.S. government agency-backed ABS at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.
Other Invested Assets
The following table summarizes the carrying amounts of other invested assets:
Alternative investments(a) (b)
12,712
13,379
Investment real estate(c)
7,057
6,900
Aircraft asset investments(d)
281
321
2,105
2,516
All other investments
1,497
1,422
(a) At March 31, 2017, includes hedge funds of $6.9 billion, private equity funds of $5.2 billion, and affordable housing partnerships of $578 million. At December 31, 2016, includes hedge funds of $7.2 billion, private equity funds of $5.5 billion, and affordable housing partnerships of $625 million.
(b) Approximately 64 percent and 21 percent of our hedge fund portfolio is available for redemption in 2017 and 2018, respectively, an additional 10 percent will be available between 2019 and 2024.
(c) Net of accumulated depreciation of $362 million and $451 million in March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.
(d) Consists of investments in aircraft equipment held in a consolidated trust.
Net Investment Income
The following table presents the components of Net investment income:
Fixed maturity securities, including short-term investments
2,801
2,936
Interest on mortgage and other loans
389
Alternative investments*
(366)
Real estate
116
Total investment income
3,812
3,127
Investment expenses
* Includes income from hedge funds, private equity funds and affordable housing partnerships. Hedge funds for which we elected the fair value option are recorded as of the balance sheet date. Other hedge funds are generally reported on a one-month lag, while private equity funds are generally reported on a one-quarter lag.
Net Realized Capital Gains and Losses
The following table presents the components of Net realized capital gains (losses):
Sales of fixed maturity securities
(362)
Sales of equity securities
Other-than-temporary impairments:
Severity
Change in intent
Foreign currency declines
(10)
Issuer-specific credit events
(57)
Adverse projected cash flows
(36)
Provision for loan losses
Foreign exchange transactions
(520)
Derivatives and hedge accounting
(376)
(72)
Impairments on investments in life settlements
Other*
* Includes $107 million of realized gains due to a purchase price adjustment on the sale of Class B shares of Prudential Financial, Inc. for the three months ended March 31, 2016.
Change in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) of Investments
The following table presents the increase (decrease) in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of our available for sale securities and other investments:
Increase (decrease) in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments:
4,778
(95)
Total increase (decrease) in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments*
833
4,535
* Excludes net unrealized losses attributable to businesses held for sale.
Evaluating Investments for Other-Than-Temporary Impairments
For a discussion of our policy for evaluating investments for other-than-temporary impairments, see Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the 2016 Annual Report.
Credit Impairments
The following table presents a rollforward of the cumulative credit losses in other-than-temporary impairments recognized in earnings for available for sale fixed maturity securities:
1,098
1,747
Increases due to:
Credit impairments on new securities subject to impairment losses
110
Additional credit impairments on previously impaired securities
Reductions due to:
Credit impaired securities fully disposed for which there was no
prior intent or requirement to sell
(150)
Accretion on securities previously impaired due to credit*
946
1,523
* Represents both accretion recognized due to changes in cash flows expected to be collected over the remaining expected term of the credit impaired securities and the accretion due to the passage of time.
Purchased Credit Impaired (PCI) Securities
We purchase certain RMBS securities that have experienced deterioration in credit quality since their issuance. We determine whether it is probable at acquisition that we will not collect all contractually required payments for these PCI securities, including both principal and interest. At acquisition, the timing and amount of the undiscounted future cash flows expected to be received on each PCI security is determined based on our best estimate using key assumptions, such as interest rates, default rates and prepayment speeds. At acquisition, the difference between the undiscounted expected future cash flows of the PCI securities and the recorded investment in the securities represents the initial accretable yield, which is accreted into Net investment income over their remaining lives on an effective yield basis. Additionally, the difference between the contractually required payments on the PCI securities and the undiscounted expected future cash flows represents the non-accretable difference at acquisition. The accretable yield and the non-accretable difference will change over time, based on actual payments received and changes in estimates of undiscounted expected future cash flows, which are discussed further below.
On a quarterly basis, the undiscounted expected future cash flows associated with PCI securities are re-evaluated based on updates to key assumptions. Declines in undiscounted expected future cash flows due to further credit deterioration as well as changes in the expected timing of the cash flows can result in the recognition of an other-than-temporary impairment charge, as PCI securities are subject to our policy for evaluating investments for other-than-temporary impairment. Changes to undiscounted expected future cash flows due solely to the changes in the contractual benchmark interest rates on variable rate PCI securities will change the accretable yield prospectively. Significant increases in undiscounted expected future cash flows for reasons other than interest rate changes are recognized prospectively as adjustments to the accretable yield.
The following tables present information on our PCI securities, which are included in bonds available for sale:
At Date of Acquisition
Contractually required payments (principal and interest)
36,159
Cash flows expected to be collected*
29,575
Recorded investment in acquired securities
19,884
* Represents undiscounted expected cash flows, including both principal and interest.
Outstanding principal balance
16,270
16,728
Amortized cost
11,649
11,987
Fair value
12,754
12,922
The following table presents activity for the accretable yield on PCI securities:
Balance, beginning of period
7,498
6,846
Newly purchased PCI securities
206
Disposals
Accretion
(210)
Effect of changes in interest rate indices
Net reclassification from (to) non-accretable difference,
including effects of prepayments
214
7,593
6,622
Pledged Investments
Secured Financing and Similar Arrangements
We enter into secured financing transactions whereby certain securities are sold under agreements to repurchase (repurchase agreements), in which we transfer securities in exchange for cash, with an agreement by us to repurchase the same or substantially similar securities. Our secured financing transactions also include those that involve the transfer of securities to financial institutions in exchange for cash (securities lending agreements). In all of these secured financing transactions, the securities transferred by us (pledged collateral) may be sold or repledged by the counterparties. These agreements are recorded at their contracted amounts plus accrued interest, other than those that are accounted for at fair value.
Pledged collateral levels are monitored daily and are generally maintained at an agreed-upon percentage of the fair value of the amounts borrowed during the life of the transactions. In the event of a decline in the fair value of the pledged collateral under these secured financing transactions, we may be required to transfer cash or additional securities as pledged collateral under these agreements. At the termination of the transactions, we and our counterparties are obligated to return the amounts borrowed and the securities transferred, respectively.
The following table presents the fair value of securities pledged to counterparties under secured financing transactions, including repurchase and securities lending agreements:
Fixed maturity securities available for sale
2,405
2,389
Other bond securities, at fair value
1,776
1,799
At March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, amounts borrowed under repurchase and securities lending agreements totaled $4.3 billion and $4.2 billion, respectively.
The following table presents the fair value of securities pledged under our repurchase agreements by collateral type and by remaining contractual maturity:
Remaining Contractual Maturity of the Agreements
Overnight and Continuous
up to 30 days
31 - 90 days
91 - 364 days
365 days or greater
377
791
1,725
842
163
860
725
1,748
776
The following table presents the fair value of securities pledged under our securities lending agreements by collateral type and by remaining contractual maturity:
439
1,598
316
2,353
368
1,466
2,257
812
1,577
We also enter into agreements in which securities are purchased by us under agreements to resell (reverse repurchase agreements), which are accounted for as secured financing transactions and reported as short-term investments or other assets, depending on their terms. These agreements are recorded at their contracted resale amounts plus accrued interest, other than those that are accounted for at fair value. In all reverse repurchase transactions, we take possession of or obtain a security interest in the related securities, and we have the right to sell or repledge this collateral received.
The following table presents information on the fair value of securities pledged to us under reverse repurchase agreements:
Securities collateral pledged to us
1,459
1,434
Amount sold or repledged by us
Insurance – Statutory and Other Deposits
Total carrying values of cash and securities deposited by our insurance subsidiaries under requirements of regulatory authorities or other insurance-related arrangements, including certain annuity-related obligations and certain reinsurance treaties, were $5.1 billion and $4.9 billion at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.
Other Pledges and Restrictions
Certain of our subsidiaries are members of Federal Home Loan Banks (FHLBs) and such membership requires the members to own stock in these FHLBs. We owned an aggregate of $116 million and $114 million of stock in FHLBs at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. In addition, our subsidiaries have pledged securities available for sale and residential loans associated with advances from FHLB, with a fair value of $4.5 billion and $116 million, respectively, at March 31, 2017 and $3.4 billion and $17 million, respectively, at December 31, 2016, associated with advances from the FHLBs.
Certain GIAs have provisions that require collateral to be posted or payments to be made by us upon a downgrade of our long-term debt ratings. The actual amount of collateral required to be posted to the counterparties in the event of such downgrades, and the aggregate amount of payments that we could be required to make, depend on market conditions, the fair value of outstanding affected transactions and other factors prevailing at and after the time of the downgrade. The fair value of securities pledged as collateral with respect to these obligations was approximately $2.2 billion at both March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016. This collateral primarily consists of securities of the U.S. government and government sponsored entities and generally cannot be repledged or resold by the counterparties.
Investments held in escrow accounts or otherwise subject to restriction as to their use were $545 million and $523 million, comprised of bonds available for sale and short term investments at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.
7. Lending Activities
The following table presents the composition of Mortgage and other loans receivable, net:
Commercial mortgages*
25,995
25,042
Residential mortgages
4,401
3,828
Life insurance policy loans
2,324
2,367
Commercial loans, other loans and notes receivable
1,447
2,300
Total mortgage and other loans receivable
34,167
33,537
Allowance for credit losses
(289)
* Commercial mortgages primarily represent loans for offices, apartments and retail properties, with exposures in New York and California representing the largest geographic concentrations (aggregating approximately 23 percent and 12 percent, respectively, at March 31, 2017, and 24 percent and 12 percent, respectively, at December 31, 2016).
Credit Quality of Commercial Mortgages
The following table presents debt service coverage ratios and loan-to-value ratios for commercial mortgages:
Debt Service Coverage Ratios(a)
>1.20X
1.00X - 1.20X
<1.00X
Loan-to-Value Ratios(b)
Less than 65%
15,636
1,309
230
17,175
65% to 75%
5,842
656
6,560
76% to 80%
881
82
1,096
Greater than 80%
496
538
1,164
Total commercial mortgages
22,855
2,636
504
1,694
15,924
5,946
575
6,583
1,246
174
1,467
1,068
21,661
2,835
546
(a) The debt service coverage ratio compares a property’s net operating income to its debt service payments, including principal and interest.
(b) The loan-to-value ratio compares the current unpaid principal balance of the loan to the estimated fair value of the underlying property collateralizing the loan.
The following table presents the credit quality performance indicators for commercial mortgages:
Number
of
Class
(dollars in millions)
Loans
Apartments
Offices
Retail
Industrial
Hotel
Others
Total(c)
Total $
Credit Quality Performance
Indicator:
In good standing
790
6,305
8,109
4,993
2,261
1,963
25,827
99
Restructured(a)
134
168
90 days or less delinquent
>90 days delinquent or in
process of foreclosure
Total(b)
794
8,243
5,011
2,277
Allowance for credit losses:
Specific
General
72
46
200
Total allowance for credit losses
77
207
784
6,005
7,830
5,179
1,898
2,373
1,589
24,874
788
7,964
5,197
(a) Loans that have been modified in troubled debt restructurings and are performing according to their restructured terms. For additional discussion of troubled debt restructurings, see Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the 2016 Annual Report.
(b) Does not reflect allowance for credit losses.
(c) 100 percent of the commercial mortgages held at such respective dates were current as to payments of principal and interest. There were no significant amounts of nonperforming commercial mortgages (defined as those loans where payment of contractual principal or interest is more than 90 days past due) during any of the periods presented.
Allowance for Credit Losses
See Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the 2016 Annual Report for a discussion of our accounting policy for evaluating Mortgage and other loans receivable for impairment.
The following table presents a rollforward of the changes in the allowance for losses on Mortgage and other loans receivable:
Commercial
Mortgages
Allowance, beginning of year
103
308
Loans charged off
Recoveries of loans previously charged off
Net charge-offs
Allowance, end of period
207 *
166 *
277
* Of the total allowance, $7 million and $12 million relate to individually assessed credit losses on $266 million and $298 million of commercial mortgages at March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
There were no loans modified in troubled debt restructurings during the three-month periods ended March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016.
8. Variable Interest Entities
We enter into various arrangements with VIEs in the normal course of business and consolidate the VIEs when we determine we are the primary beneficiary. This analysis includes a review of the VIE’s capital structure, related contractual relationships and terms, nature of the VIE’s operations and purpose, nature of the VIE’s interests issued and our involvement with the entity. When assessing the need to consolidate a VIE, we evaluate the design of the VIE as well as the related risks the entity was designed to expose the variable interest holders to.
The primary beneficiary is the entity that has both (1) the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly affect the entity’s economic performance and (2) the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits that could be potentially significant to the VIE. While also considering these factors, the consolidation conclusion depends on the breadth of our decision-making ability and our ability to influence activities that significantly affect the economic performance of the VIE.
Balance Sheet Classification and Exposure to Loss
The following table presents the total assets and total liabilities associated with our variable interests in consolidated VIEs, as classified in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets:
Real Estate and Investment Entities(d)
Securitization Vehicles(e)
Structured Investment
Vehicle
Affordable Housing Partnerships
9,534
4,751
5,019
1,328
1,029
3,118
4,452
Other (a)
1,158
436
90
Total assets(b)
1,273
17,052
322
3,554
119
22,320
682
1,880
3,053
Other (c)
217
522
897
2,097
3,617
10,233
4,858
266
5,129
1,442
104
1,547
1,052
2,821
28
4,222
365
1,104
384
92
1,995
1,418
17,958
3,205
23,126
444
771
1,696
2,973
Other(c)
224
203
211
677
668
974
1,907
3,650
(a) Comprised primarily of Short-term investments and Other assets at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016.
(b) The assets of each VIE can be used only to settle specific obligations of that VIE.
(c) Comprised primarily of Other liabilities and Derivative liabilities, at fair value, at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016.
(d) At March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, off-balance sheet exposure primarily consisting of commitments to real estate and investment entities was $93 million and $106 million, respectively.
(e) At March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, $17.0 billion and $17.3 billion, respectively, of the total assets of consolidated securitization vehicles were owed to AIG Parent or its subsidiaries.
We calculate our maximum exposure to loss to be (i) the amount invested in the debt or equity of the VIE, (ii) the notional amount of VIE assets or liabilities where we have also provided credit protection to the VIE with the VIE as the referenced obligation, and (iii) other commitments and guarantees to the VIE. Interest holders in VIEs sponsored by us generally have recourse only to the assets and cash flows of the VIEs and do not have recourse to us, except in limited circumstances when we have provided a guarantee to the VIE’s interest holders.
The following table presents total assets of unconsolidated VIEs in which we hold a variable interest, as well as our maximum exposure to loss associated with these VIEs:
Maximum Exposure to Loss
Total VIE
On-Balance
Off-Balance
Assets
Sheet(b)
Sheet
Real estate and investment entities(a)
401,264
10,517
2,072
12,589
Affordable housing partnerships
4,407
758
2,458
1,175
(c)
1,464
408,129
11,564
3,247
14,811
409,087
11,015
2,115
13,130
4,709
785
2,869
314
1,045
1,359
416,665
12,114
3,160
15,274
(a) Comprised primarily of hedge funds and private equity funds.
(b) At March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, $ 11.1 billion and $11.7 billion, respectively, of our total unconsolidated VIE assets were recorded as Other invested assets.
(c) These amounts represent our estimate of the maximum exposure to loss under certain insurance policies issued to VIEs if a hypothetical loss occurred to the extent of the full amount of the insured value. Our insurance policies cover defined risks and our estimate of liability is included in our insurance reserves on the balance sheet.
See Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the 2016 Annual Report for additional information on VIEs.
9. Derivatives and Hedge Accounting
We use derivatives and other financial instruments as part of our financial risk management programs and as part of our investment operations. See Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the 2016 Annual Report for a discussion of our accounting policies and procedures regarding derivatives and hedge accounting.
Our businesses use derivatives and other instruments as part of their financial risk management. Interest rate derivatives (such as interest rate swaps) are used to manage interest rate risk associated with embedded derivatives contained in insurance contract liabilities, fixed maturity securities, outstanding medium‑ and long‑term notes as well as other interest rate sensitive assets and liabilities. Foreign exchange derivatives (principally foreign exchange forwards and options) are used to economically mitigate risk associated with non‑U.S. dollar denominated debt, net capital exposures, and foreign currency transactions. Equity derivatives are used to mitigate financial risk embedded in certain insurance liabilities. The derivatives are effective economic hedges of the exposures that they are meant to offset.
In addition to hedging activities, we also enter into derivative instruments with respect to investment operations, which may include, among other things, CDSs and purchases of investments with embedded derivatives, such as equity‑linked notes and convertible bonds.
The following table presents the notional amounts of our derivatives and the fair value of derivative assets and liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets:
Gross Derivative Assets
Gross Derivative Liabilities
Notional
Amount
Derivatives designated as
hedging instruments:(a)
761
175
782
4,353
340
2,361
3,527
2,602
113
Derivatives not designated
as hedging instruments:(a)
59,814
2,348
27,134
2,504
51,030
44,211
3,066
6,383
9,268
1,034
9,468
935
7,674
21,506
2,703
14,060
8,633
Credit contracts(b)
861
Other contracts(c)
39,113
37,633
Total derivatives, gross
131,327
3,930
43,232
3,991
115,897
3,977
64,938
4,802
Counterparty netting(d)
Cash collateral(e)
Total derivatives on condensed
consolidated balance sheets(f)
(a) Fair value amounts are shown before the effects of counterparty netting adjustments and offsetting cash collateral.
(b) As of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, included CDSs on super senior multi-sector CDOs with a net notional amount of $774 million and $801 million (fair value liability of $299 million and $308 million), respectively. The expected weighted average maturity as of March 31, 2017 is six years. Because of long-term maturities of the CDSs in the portfolio, we are unable to make reasonable estimates of the periods during which any payments would be made. However, the net notional amount represents the maximum exposure to loss on the portfolio. As of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, there were no super senior corporate debt/CLOs remaining.
(c) Consists primarily of stable value wraps and contracts with multiple underlying exposures.
(d) Represents netting of derivative exposures covered by a qualifying master netting agreement.
(e) Represents cash collateral posted and received that is eligible for netting.
(f) Freestanding derivatives only, excludes Embedded derivatives. Derivative instrument assets and liabilities are recorded in Other Assets and Liabilities, respectively. Fair value of assets related to bifurcated Embedded derivatives was zero at both March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016. Fair value of liabilities related to bifurcated Embedded derivatives was $3.1 billion at both March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016. A bifurcated Embedded derivative is generally presented with the host contract in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Embedded derivatives are primarily related to guarantee features in variable annuity products, which include equity and interest rate components.
We engage in derivative transactions that are not subject to a clearing requirement directly with unaffiliated third parties, in most cases, under International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. (ISDA) Master Agreements. Many of the ISDA Master Agreements also include Credit Support Annex (CSA) provisions, which provide for collateral postings that may vary at various ratings and threshold levels. We attempt to reduce our risk with certain counterparties by entering into agreements that enable collateral to be obtained from a counterparty on an upfront or contingent basis. We minimize the risk that counterparties might be unable to fulfill their contractual obligations by monitoring counterparty credit exposure and collateral value and generally requiring additional collateral to be posted upon the occurrence of certain events or circumstances. In addition, certain derivative transactions have provisions that require collateral to be posted upon a downgrade of our long‑term debt ratings or give the counterparty the right to terminate the transaction. In the case of some of the derivative transactions, upon a downgrade of our long‑term debt ratings, as an alternative to posting collateral and subject to certain conditions, we may assign the transaction to an obligor with higher debt ratings or arrange for a substitute guarantee of our obligations by an obligor with higher debt ratings or take other similar action. The actual amount of collateral required to be posted to counterparties in the event of such downgrades, or the aggregate amount of payments that we could be required to make, depends on market conditions, the fair value of outstanding affected transactions and other factors prevailing at and after the time of the downgrade.
Collateral posted by us to third parties for derivative transactions was $3.6 billion and $4.5 billion at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. In the case of collateral posted under derivative transactions that are not subject to clearing, this collateral can generally be repledged or resold by the counterparties. Collateral provided to us from third parties for derivative transactions was $1.4 billion and $1.5 billion at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. In the case of collateral provided to us under derivative transactions that are not subject to clearing, we generally can repledge or resell collateral.
Offsetting
We have elected to present all derivative receivables and derivative payables, and the related cash collateral received and paid, on a net basis on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets when a legally enforceable ISDA Master Agreement exists between us and our derivative counterparty. An ISDA Master Agreement is an agreement governing multiple derivative transactions between two counterparties. The ISDA Master Agreement generally provides for the net settlement of all, or a specified group, of these derivative transactions, as well as transferred collateral, through a single payment, and in a single currency, as applicable. The net settlement provisions apply in the event of a default on, or affecting any, one derivative transaction or a termination event affecting all, or a specified group of, derivative transactions governed by the ISDA Master Agreement.
Hedge Accounting
We designated certain derivatives entered into with third parties as fair value hedges of available for sale investment securities held by our insurance subsidiaries. The fair value hedges include foreign currency forwards and cross currency swaps designated as hedges of the change in fair value of foreign currency denominated available for sale securities attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates. We also designated certain interest rate swaps entered into with third parties as fair value hedges of fixed rate GICs attributable to changes in benchmark interest rates.
We use foreign currency denominated debt and cross-currency swaps as hedging instruments in net investment hedge relationships to mitigate the foreign exchange risk associated with our non-U.S. dollar functional currency foreign subsidiaries. For net investment hedge relationships where issued debt is used as a hedging instrument, we assess the hedge effectiveness and measure the amount of ineffectiveness based on changes in spot rates. For net investment hedge relationships that use derivatives as hedging instruments, we assess hedge effectiveness and measure hedge ineffectiveness using changes in forward rates. For the three-month periods ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, we recognized losses of $42 million and $5 million, respectively, included in Change in foreign currency translation adjustment in Other comprehensive income related to the net investment hedge relationships.
A qualitative methodology is utilized to assess hedge effectiveness for net investment hedges, while regression analysis is employed for all other hedges.
The following table presents the gain (loss) recognized in earnings on our derivative instruments in fair value hedging relationships in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income:
Gains/(Losses) Recognized in Earnings for:
Including Gains/(Losses) Attributable to:
Hedging
Hedged
Hedge
Excluded
Derivatives(a)
Items
Ineffectiveness
Components
Other(b)
Interest rate contracts:
Realized capital gains/(losses)
Gain/(Loss) on extinguishment of debt
Foreign exchange contracts:
(42)
Equity contracts:
(a) The amounts presented do not include the periodic net coupon settlements of the derivative contract or the coupon income (expense) related to the hedged item.
(b) Represents accretion/amortization of opening fair value of the hedged item at inception of hedge relationship, amortization of basis adjustment on hedged item following the discontinuation of hedge accounting, and the release of debt basis adjustment following the repurchase of issued debt that was part of previously-discontinued fair value hedge relationship.
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
The following table presents the effect of derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income:
Recognized in Earnings
By Derivative Type:
770
(46)
(28)
(314)
Embedded derivatives
(772)
(333)
(139)
By Classification:
(384)
(35)
Other income (losses)
Policyholder benefits and claims incurred
Credit Risk-Related Contingent Features
The aggregate fair value of our derivative instruments that contain credit risk-related contingent features that were in a net liability position at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, was approximately $2.3 billion and $3.0 billion, respectively. The aggregate fair value of assets posted as collateral under these contracts at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, was approximately $3.0 billion and $4.0 billion, respectively.
We estimate that at March 31, 2017, based on our outstanding financial derivative transactions, a downgrade of our long-term senior debt ratings to BBB or BBB– by Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC, a subsidiary of S&P Global Inc., and/or a downgrade to Baa2 or Baa3 by Moody’s Investors’ Service, Inc. would permit counterparties to make additional collateral calls and permit certain counterparties to elect early termination of contracts, resulting in corresponding collateral postings and termination payments in the total amount of up to approximately $122 million.
Additional collateral postings upon downgrade are estimated based on the factors in the individual collateral posting provisions of the CSA with each counterparty and current exposure as of March 31, 2017. Factors considered in estimating the termination payments upon downgrade include current market conditions and the terms of the respective CSA provisions. Our estimates are also based on the assumption that counterparties will terminate based on their net exposure to us. The actual termination payments could differ from our estimates given market conditions at the time of downgrade and the level of uncertainty in estimating both the number of counterparties who may elect to exercise their right to terminate and the payment that may be triggered in connection with any such exercise.
Hybrid Securities with Embedded Credit Derivatives
We invest in hybrid securities (such as credit‑linked notes) with the intent of generating income, and not specifically to acquire exposure to embedded derivative risk. As is the case with our other investments in RMBS, CMBS, CDOs and ABS, our investments in these hybrid securities are exposed to losses only up to the amount of our initial investment in the hybrid security. Other than our initial investment in the hybrid securities, we have no further obligation to make payments on the embedded credit derivatives in the related hybrid securities.
We elect to account for our investments in these hybrid securities with embedded written credit derivatives at fair value, with changes in fair value recognized in Net investment income and Other income. Our investments in these hybrid securities are reported as Other bond securities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The fair values of these hybrid securities were $4.6 billion and $4.8 billion at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. These securities have par amounts of $9.9 billion and $10.1 billion at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, and have remaining stated maturity dates that extend to 2052.
10. Insurance Liabilities
Liability for Unpaid Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses (Loss Reserves)
Loss reserves represent the accumulation of estimates of unpaid claims, including estimates for claims incurred but not reported (IBNR) and loss adjustment expenses (LAE), less applicable discount. We regularly review and update the methods used to determine loss reserve estimates. Any adjustments resulting from this review are reflected currently in pre-tax income. Because these estimates are subject to the outcome of future events, changes in estimates are common given that loss trends vary and time is often required for changes in trends to be recognized and confirmed. Reserve changes that increase previous estimates of ultimate cost are referred to as unfavorable or adverse development or reserve strengthening. Reserve changes that decrease previous estimates of ultimate cost are referred to as favorable development.
Our gross loss reserves before reinsurance and discount are net of contractual deductible recoverable amounts due from policyholders of approximately $12.8 billion at both March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016. These recoverable amounts are related to certain policies with high deductibles (in excess of high dollar amounts retained by the insured through self-insured retentions, deductibles, retrospective programs, or captive arrangements, each referred to generically as “deductibles”), primarily for U.S. commercial casualty business. With respect to the deductible portion of the claim, we manage and pay the entire claim on behalf of the insured and are reimbursed by the insured for the deductible portion of the claim. Thus, these recoverable amounts represent a credit exposure to us. At March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, we held collateral of approximately $9.8 billion and $9.7 billion, respectively, for these deductible recoverable amounts, consisting primarily of letters of credit and funded trust agreements.
The following table presents the roll forward of activity in Loss Reserves:
Liability for unpaid loss and loss adjustment expenses, beginning of year
74,942
Reinsurance recoverable
(15,532)
(14,339)
Net Liability for unpaid loss and loss adjustment expenses, beginning of year
61,545
60,603
Foreign exchange effect
(105)
(160)
Dispositions(a)
Retroactive reinsurance adjustment (net of discount)(b)
(11,199)
50,241
60,443
Losses and loss adjustment expenses incurred:
Current year
4,300
4,912
Prior years, excluding discount
(66)
Prior years, discount charge (benefit)
Total losses and loss adjustment expenses incurred
4,837
Losses and loss adjustment expenses paid:
(571)
(580)
Prior years
(4,753)
(4,966)
Total losses and loss adjustment expenses paid
(5,324)
(5,546)
Reclassified to liabilities held for sale(c)
(87)
Liability for unpaid loss and loss adjustment expenses, end of period:
Net liability for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses
49,130
59,734
26,920
14,212
73,946
(a) Includes amounts related to dispositions through the date of disposition. Includes sale of UGC and Ascot.
(b) Includes discount on retroactive reinsurance in the amount of $1.7 billion.
(c) Represents change in loss reserves included in our pending sale of certain of our insurance operations to Fairfax for the three months ended March 31, 2017. Upon consummation of the sale, we may retain a portion of these reserves through reinsurance arrangements.
On January 20, 2017, we entered into an adverse development reinsurance agreement with NICO, a subsidiary of Berkshire, under which we transferred to NICO 80 percent of the reserve risk on substantially all of our U.S. Commercial long-tail exposures for accident years 2015 and prior. Under this agreement, we ceded to NICO 80 percent of the paid losses on subject business paid on or after January 1, 2016 in excess of $25 billion of net paid losses, up to an aggregate limit of $25 billion. At NICO’s 80 percent share, NICO’s limit of liability under the contract is $20 billion. We account for this transaction as retroactive reinsurance. We paid total consideration, including interest, of $10.2 billion. The consideration was placed into a collateral trust account as security for NICO’s claim payment obligations, and Berkshire has provided a parental guarantee to secure the obligations of NICO under the agreement.
Discounting of Loss Reserves
At March 31, 2017, the loss reserves reflect a net loss reserve discount of $1.9 billion, including tabular and non-tabular calculations based upon the following assumptions:
Certain asbestos claims are discounted when allowed by the regulator and when payments are fixed and determinable, based on the investment yields of the companies and the payout pattern for the claims. At December 31, 2016, the discount for asbestos reserves was fully amortized.
The tabular workers’ compensation discount is calculated based on a 3.5 percent interest rate and the mortality rate used in the 2007 U.S. Life Table.
The non-tabular workers’ compensation discount is calculated separately for companies domiciled in New York and Pennsylvania, and follows the statutory regulations (prescribed or permitted) for each state. For New York companies, the discount is based on a 5 percent interest rate and the companies’ own payout patterns. In 2012, for Pennsylvania companies, the statute has specified discount factors for accident years 2001 and prior, which are based on a 6 percent interest rate and an industry payout pattern. For accident years 2002 and subsequent, the discount is based on the payout patterns and investment yields of the companies.
In 2013, our Pennsylvania regulator approved use of a consistent discount rate (U.S. Treasury rate plus a liquidity premium) to all of our workers’ compensation reserves in our Pennsylvania-domiciled companies, as well as our use of updated payout patterns specific to our primary and excess workers compensation portfolios.
In the fourth quarter of 2016, our Pennsylvania and Delaware regulators approved an updated discount rate that we applied to our workers’ compensation loss reserves for the legal entities domiciled in those states.
The discount consists of $491 million of tabular discount and $1.5 billion of non-tabular discount for workers’ compensation. During the three-month periods ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, the benefit/(charge) from changes in discount of $25 million and $10 million, respectively, were recorded as part of the policyholder benefits and losses incurred in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income. For the three-month period ended March 31, 2017, the discount on workers’ compensation reserves decreased by $1.7 billion due to the impact of the adverse development reinsurance agreement with NICO.
During the first quarter of 2017, reserves were established for accident year 2017, which increased the discount by $32 million. In addition, the increase in the forward yield curve component of the discount rates resulted in a $57 million increase in the loss reserve discount. This increase was partially offset by a $64 million reduction for accident years 2016 and prior, primarily from accretion of discount on reserves for the first quarter of 2017. This resulted in an increase in the loss reserve discount of $25 million.
During the first quarter of 2016, reserves were established for accident year 2016, which increased the discount by $48 million. This increase was partially offset by a $27 million reduction for accident years 2015 and prior, primarily from accretion of discount on reserves for the first quarter of 2016. In addition, decreases in the forward yield curve component of the discount rates resulted in an $11 million decrease in the loss reserve discount, as Treasury rates generally decreased in the first quarter of 2016 along the payout pattern horizon as compared to the prior periods, partially offset by an increase in the credit spread. This resulted in an increase in the loss reserve discount of $10 million.
The following table presents the components of the loss reserve discount discussed above:
U.S. Liability
- Property and
and
Casualty run-off
Financial Lines
Insurance Lines
U.S. workers' compensation
2,606
989
3,595
2,583
987
3,570
Retroactive reinsurance
(1,655)
Total reserve discount
951
1,940
The following table presents the net loss reserve discount benefit (charge):
Current accident year
Accretion and other adjustments
to prior year discount
(16)
Effect of interest rate changes
Net reserve discount
benefit (charge)
Change in discount on loss reserves
ceded under retroactive reinsurance
Net change in total reserve
discount
(1,632)
(1,630)
Comprised of:
U.S. Workers' compensation
Asbestos
11. Contingencies, Commitments and Guarantees
In the normal course of business, various contingent liabilities and commitments are entered into by AIG and our subsidiaries. In addition, AIG Parent guarantees various obligations of certain subsidiaries.
Although AIG cannot currently quantify its ultimate liability for unresolved litigation and investigation matters, including those referred to below, it is possible that such liability could have a material adverse effect on AIG’s consolidated financial condition or its consolidated results of operations or consolidated cash flows for an individual reporting period.
Legal Contingencies
Overview. In the normal course of business, AIG and our subsidiaries are, like others in the insurance and financial services industries in general, subject to litigation, including claims for punitive damages. In our insurance operations, litigation arising from claims settlement activities is generally considered in the establishment of our loss reserves. However, the potential for increasing jury awards and settlements makes it difficult to assess the ultimate outcome of such litigation. AIG is also subject to derivative, class action and other claims asserted by its shareholders and others alleging, among other things, breach of fiduciary duties by its directors and officers and violations of insurance laws and regulations, as well as federal and state securities laws. In the case of any derivative action brought on behalf of AIG, any recovery would accrue to the benefit of AIG.
Various regulatory and governmental agencies have been reviewing certain transactions and practices of AIG and our subsidiaries in connection with industry-wide and other inquiries into, among other matters, certain business practices of current and former operating insurance subsidiaries. We have cooperated, and will continue to cooperate, in producing documents and other information in response to subpoenas and other requests.
AIG’s Subprime Exposure, AIGFP Credit Default Swap Portfolio and Related Matters
AIG, AIG Financial Products Corp. and related subsidiaries (collectively AIGFP), and certain directors and officers of AIG, AIGFP and other AIG subsidiaries have been named in various actions relating to our exposure to the U.S. residential subprime mortgage market, unrealized market valuation losses on AIGFP’s super senior credit default swap portfolio, losses and liquidity constraints relating to our securities lending program and related disclosure and other matters (Subprime Exposure Issues).
Consolidated 2008 Securities Litigation. On May 19, 2009, a consolidated class action complaint, resulting from the consolidation of eight purported securities class actions filed between May 2008 and January 2009, was filed against AIG and certain directors and officers of AIG and AIGFP, AIG’s outside auditors, and the underwriters of various securities offerings in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) in In re American International Group, Inc. 2008 Securities Litigation (the Consolidated 2008 Securities Litigation), asserting claims under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and claims under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), for allegedly materially false and misleading statements in AIG’s public disclosures from March 16, 2006 to September 16, 2008 relating to, among other things, the Subprime Exposure Issues.
In 2014, lead plaintiff, AIG and AIG’s outside auditor accepted mediators’ proposals to settle the Consolidated 2008 Securities Litigation against all defendants. On October 22, 2014, AIG paid the settlement amount of $960 million. On March 20, 2015, the Court issued an Order and Final Judgment approving the class settlement and dismissing the action with prejudice, and the AIG settlement became final on June 29, 2015.
Individual Securities Litigations. Between November 18, 2011 and February 9, 2015, eleven separate, though similar, securities actions (Individual Securities Litigations) were filed in or transferred to the SDNY, asserting claims substantially similar to those in the Consolidated 2008 Securities Litigation against AIG and certain directors and officers of AIG and AIGFP. Two of the actions were voluntarily dismissed. On September 10, 2015, the SDNY granted AIG’s motion to dismiss some of the claims in the Individual Securities Litigations in whole or in part. AIG has settled eight of the nine remaining actions. The remaining Individual Securities Litigation pending in the SDNY was brought by a series of institutional investor funds. After the court’s decision granting AIG’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s claims in part, the claims in the remaining action are limited to a claim under Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act for allegedly materially false and misleading statements in AIG’s public disclosures from February 8, 2008 to September 16, 2008 relating to, among other things, the Subprime Exposure Issues. On January 17, 2017, AIG filed a motion for summary judgment to dismiss the vast majority of the institutional investor funds’ remaining claims and a motion to stay the action pending the resolution of this motion. AIG has appealed a March 9, 2017 decision by the magistrate judge, denying AIG’s motion to stay.
On March 27, 2015, an additional securities action was filed in state court in Orange County, California asserting a claim against AIG pursuant to Section 11 of the Securities Act (the California Action) that is substantially similar to those in the Consolidated 2008 Securities Litigation and the Individual Securities Litigations. After denying AIG’s motion to remove the California Action to federal court and stay the action, the trial court overruled AIG’s demurrer to dismiss all of the claims asserted in the California Action, which is currently on appeal to the California Court of Appeals for the Fourth Appellate District.
We have accrued our current estimate of probable loss with respect to these litigations.
Starr International Litigation
On November 21, 2011, Starr International Company, Inc. (SICO) filed a complaint against the United States in the United States Court of Federal Claims (the Court of Federal Claims), bringing claims, both individually and on behalf of the classes defined below and derivatively on behalf of AIG (the SICO Treasury Action). The complaint challenges the government’s assistance of AIG, pursuant to which AIG entered into a credit facility with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (the FRBNY, and such credit facility, the FRBNY Credit Facility) and the United States received an approximately 80 percent ownership in AIG. The complaint alleges that the interest rate imposed on AIG and the appropriation of approximately 80 percent of AIG’s equity was discriminatory, unprecedented, and inconsistent with liquidity assistance offered by the government to other comparable firms at the time and violated the Equal Protection, Due Process, and Takings Clauses of the U.S. Constitution.
In the SICO Treasury Action, the only claims naming AIG as a party (as a nominal defendant) are derivative claims on behalf of AIG. On September 21, 2012, SICO made a pre‑litigation demand on our Board demanding that we pursue the derivative claims or allow SICO to pursue the claims on our behalf. On January 9, 2013, our Board unanimously refused SICO’s demand in its entirety and on January 23, 2013, counsel for the Board sent a letter to counsel for SICO describing the process by which our Board considered and refused SICO’s demand and stating the reasons for our Board’s determination.
On March 11, 2013, SICO filed a second amended complaint in the SICO Treasury Action alleging that its demand was wrongfully refused. On June 26, 2013, the Court of Federal Claims granted AIG’s and the United States’ motions to dismiss SICO’s derivative claims in the SICO Treasury Action due to our Board’s refusal of SICO’s demand and denied the United States’ motion to dismiss SICO’s direct, non-derivative claims.
On March 11, 2013, the Court of Federal Claims in the SICO Treasury Action granted SICO’s motion for class certification of two classes with respect to SICO’s non‑derivative claims: (1) persons and entities who held shares of AIG Common Stock on or before September 16, 2008 and who owned those shares on September 22, 2008 (the Credit Agreement Shareholder Class); and (2) persons and entities who owned shares of AIG Common Stock on June 30, 2009 and were eligible to vote those shares at AIG’s June 30, 2009 annual meeting of shareholders (the Reverse Stock Split Shareholder Class). SICO has provided notice of class certification to potential members of the classes, who, pursuant to a court order issued on April 25, 2013, had to return opt‑in consent forms by September 16, 2013 to participate in either class. 286,908 holders of AIG Common Stock during the two class periods have opted into the classes.
On June 15, 2015, the Court of Federal Claims issued its opinion and order in the SICO Treasury Action. The Court found that the United States exceeded its statutory authority by exacting approximately 80 percent of AIG’s equity in exchange for the FRBNY Credit Facility, but that AIG shareholders suffered no damages as a result. SICO argued during trial that the two classes are entitled to a total of approximately $40 billion in damages, plus interest. The Court also found that the United States was not liable to the Reverse Stock Split Class in connection with the reverse stock split vote at the June 30, 2009 annual meeting of shareholders.
On June 17, 2015, the Court of Federal Claims entered judgment stating that “the Credit Agreement Shareholder Class shall prevail on liability due to the Government's illegal exaction, but shall recover zero damages, and that the Reverse Stock Split Shareholder Class shall not prevail on liability or damages.” SICO filed a notice of appeal of the July 2, 2012 dismissal of SICO’s unconstitutional conditions claim, the June 26, 2013 dismissal of SICO’s derivative claims, the Court’s June 15, 2015 opinion and order, and the Court’s June 17, 2015 judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The United States filed a notice of cross appeal of the Court’s July 2, 2012 opinion and order denying in part its motion to dismiss, the Court’s June 26, 2013 opinion and order denying its motion to dismiss SICO’s direct claims, the Court’s June 15, 2015 opinion and order, and the Court’s June 17, 2015 judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
On August 25, 2015, SICO filed its appellate brief, in which it stated SICO does not appeal the dismissal of the derivative claims it asserted on behalf of AIG.
In the Court of Federal Claims, the United States has alleged, as an affirmative defense in its answer, that AIG is obligated to indemnify the FRBNY and its representatives, including the Federal Reserve Board of Governors and the United States (as the FRBNY’s principal), for any recovery in the SICO Treasury Action.
AIG believes that any indemnification obligation would arise only if: (a) SICO prevails on its appeal and ultimately receives an award of damages; (b) the United States then commences an action against AIG seeking indemnification; and (c) the United States is successful in such an action through any appellate process. If SICO prevails on its claims and the United States seeks indemnification from AIG, AIG intends to assert defenses thereto. A reversal of the Court of Federal Claim’s June 17, 2015 decision and judgment and a final determination that the United States is liable for damages, together with a final determination that AIG is obligated to indemnify the United States for any such damages, could have a material adverse effect on our business, consolidated financial condition and results of operations.
Regulatory and Related Matters
In April 2007, the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) formed a Settlement Review Working Group, directed by the State of Indiana, to review the Workers’ Compensation Residual Market Assessment portion of the settlement between AIG, the Office of the New York Attorney General, and the New York State Department of Insurance. In late 2007, the Settlement Review Working Group, under the direction of Indiana, Minnesota and Rhode Island, recommended that a multi-state targeted market conduct examination focusing on workers’ compensation insurance be commenced under the direction of the NAIC’s Market Analysis Working Group. AIG was informed of the multi-state targeted market conduct examination in January 2008. The lead states in the multi-state examination were Delaware, Florida, Indiana, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New York, Pennsylvania and Rhode Island. All other states (and the District of Columbia) agreed to participate in the multi-state examination. The examination focused on legacy issues related to certain AIG entities’ writing and reporting of workers compensation insurance between 1985 and 1996.
On December 17, 2010, AIG and the lead states reached an agreement to settle all regulatory liabilities arising out of the subjects of the multistate examination. This regulatory settlement agreement, which was agreed to by all 50 states and the District of Columbia, included, among other terms, (i) AIG’s payment of $100 million in regulatory fines and penalties; (ii) AIG’s payment of $46.5 million in outstanding premium taxes and assessments; (iii) AIG’s agreement to enter into a compliance plan describing agreed-upon specific steps and standards for evaluating AIG’s ongoing compliance with state regulations governing the setting of workers’ compensation insurance premium rates and the reporting of workers’ compensation premiums; and (iv) AIG’s agreement to pay up to $150 million in contingent fines in the event that AIG fails to comply substantially with the compliance plan requirements. In furtherance of the compliance plan, the agreement provided for a monitoring period from May 29, 2012 to May 29, 2014 leading up to a compliance plan examination. After the close of the monitoring period, as part of preparation for the actual conduct of the compliance plan examination, on or about October 1, 2014, AIG and the lead states agreed upon corrective action plans to address particular issues identified during the monitoring period. The compliance plan examination has concluded, and the compliance plan examination report did not impose any fines on AIG.
In connection with a multi‑state examination of certain accident and health products, including travel products, issued by National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. (National Union), AIG Property Casualty Inc. (formerly Chartis Inc.), on behalf of itself, National Union, and certain of AIG Property Casualty Inc.’s insurance and non‑insurance companies (collectively, the AIG PC parties) entered into a Regulatory Settlement Agreement with regulators from 50 U.S. jurisdictions effective November 29, 2012. Under the agreement, and without admitting any liability for the issues raised in the examination, the AIG PC parties (i) paid a civil penalty of $50 million, (ii) entered into a corrective action plan describing agreed‑upon specific steps and standards for evaluating the AIG PC parties’ ongoing compliance with laws and regulations governing the issues identified in the examination, and (iii) agreed to pay a contingent fine in the event that the AIG PC parties fail to satisfy certain terms of the corrective action plan. On May 23, 2016, the managing lead state in the multi-state examination ordered that the companies subject to the Regulatory Settlement Agreement have “complied with the terms” of the Regulatory Settlement Agreement and that no contingent fine or civil penalty would be due. On April 27, 2017, a court granted final approval of the settlement of civil litigation relating to the conduct of National Union’s and other AIG companies’ accident and health business. An objector has thirty days to appeal the grant of final approval. The settlement funds, previously placed into escrow, will be disbursed once the deadline for appeal has expired. We had previously accrued our estimate of loss with respect to this settlement.
Other Commitments
In the normal course of business, we enter into commitments to invest in limited partnerships, private equity funds and hedge funds and to purchase and develop real estate in the U.S. and abroad. These commitments totaled $3.1 billion at March 31, 2017.
Guarantees
Subsidiaries
We have issued unconditional guarantees with respect to the prompt payment, when due, of all present and future payment obligations and liabilities of AIGFP and of AIG Markets arising from transactions entered into by AIG Markets.
In connection with AIGFP’s business activities, AIGFP has issued, in a limited number of transactions, standby letters of credit or similar facilities to equity investors of structured leasing transactions in an amount equal to the termination value owing to the equity investor by the lessee in the event of a lessee default (the equity termination value). The total amount outstanding at March 31, 2017 was $139 million. In those transactions, AIGFP has agreed to pay such amount if the lessee fails to pay. The amount payable by AIGFP is, in certain cases, partially offset by amounts payable under other instruments typically equal to the present value of scheduled payments to be made by AIGFP. In the event that AIGFP is required to make a payment to the equity investor, the lessee is unconditionally obligated to reimburse AIGFP. To the extent that the equity investor is paid the equity termination value from the standby letter of credit and/or other sources, including payments by the lessee, AIGFP takes an assignment of the equity investor’s rights under the lease of the underlying property. Because the obligations of the lessee under the lease transactions are generally economically defeased, lessee bankruptcy is the most likely circumstance in which AIGFP would be required to pay without reimbursement.
Asset Dispositions
We are subject to financial guarantees and indemnity arrangements in connection with the completed sales of businesses pursuant to our asset disposition plan. The various arrangements may be triggered by, among other things, declines in asset values, the occurrence of specified business contingencies, the realization of contingent liabilities, developments in litigation or breaches of representations, warranties or covenants provided by us. These arrangements are typically subject to various time limitations, defined by the contract or by operation of law, such as statutes of limitation. In some cases, the maximum potential obligation is subject to contractual limitations, while in other cases such limitations are not specified or are not applicable.
We are unable to develop a reasonable estimate of the maximum potential payout under certain of these arrangements. Overall, we believe that it is unlikely we will have to make any material payments related to completed sales under these arrangements, and no material liabilities related to these arrangements have been recorded in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
• See Note 8 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion on commitments and guarantees associated with VIEs.
• See Note 9 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional disclosures about derivatives.
• See Note 16 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional disclosures about guarantees of outstanding debt.
12. Equity
Shares Outstanding
The following table presents a rollforward of outstanding shares:
Common Stock
Stock Issued
Shares, beginning of year
1,906,671,492
(911,335,651)
995,335,841
Shares issued
3,138,933
Shares repurchased
(55,994,748)
Shares, end of period
(964,191,466)
942,480,026
Payment of future dividends to our shareholders and repurchases of AIG Common Stock depends in part on the regulatory framework that we are currently subject to and that will ultimately be applicable to us, including as a nonbank systemically important financial institution under the Dodd‑Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and a global systemically important insurer. In addition, dividends are payable on AIG Common Stock only when, as and if declared by our Board of Directors in its discretion, from funds legally available for this purpose. In considering whether to pay a dividend or purchase shares of AIG Common Stock, our Board of Directors considers a number of factors, including, but not limited to: the capital resources available to support our insurance operations and business strategies, AIG’s funding capacity and capital resources in comparison to internal benchmarks, expectations for capital generation, rating agency expectations for capital, regulatory standards for capital and capital distributions, and such other factors as our Board of Directors may deem relevant.
On March 29, 2017, we paid a dividend of $0.32 per share on AIG Common Stock to shareholders of record on March 15, 2017. On March 28, 2016, we paid a dividend of $0.32 per share on AIG Common Stock to shareholders of record on March 14, 2016.
See Note 19 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the 2016 Annual Report for a discussion of restrictions on payments of dividends to AIG Parent by its subsidiaries.
Repurchase of AIG Common Stock
The following table presents repurchases of AIG Common Stock and warrants to purchase shares of AIG Common Stock:
Aggregate repurchases of common stock
3,585
3,486
Total number of common shares repurchased
Aggregate repurchases of warrants
Total number of warrants repurchased
Our Board of Directors has authorized the repurchase of shares of AIG Common Stock through a series of actions. On February 14, 2017, our Board of Directors authorized an additional increase of $3.5 billion to its previous share repurchase authorization. As of March 31, 2017, approximately $2.4 billion remained under our share repurchase authorization. Shares may be repurchased from time to time in the open market, private purchases, through forward, derivative, accelerated repurchase or automatic repurchase transactions or otherwise (including through the purchase of warrants). Certain of our share repurchases have been and may from time to time be effected through Exchange Act Rule 10b5-1 repurchase plans.
The timing of any future repurchases will depend on market conditions, our financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and other factors.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
The following table presents a rollforward of Accumulated other comprehensive income:
Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) of Fixed Maturity Securities on Which Other-Than- Temporary Credit Impairments Were Taken
Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) of All Other Investments
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments
Retirement Plan Liabilities Adjustment
Balance, December 31, 2016, net of tax
426
6,405
(2,629)
(972)
Change in unrealized appreciation of investments
143
690
Change in deferred policy acquisition costs adjustment and other*
Change in future policy benefits
(86)
(304)
Change in net actuarial loss
Change in prior service cost
Change in deferred tax asset (liability)
(61)
Total other comprehensive income (loss)
Noncontrolling interests
Balance, March 31, 2017, net of tax
540
7,100
(2,905)
(954)
Balance, December 31, 2015, net of tax
696
5,566
(2,879)
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments
(548)
5,083
Change in deferred policy acquisition costs adjustment and other
(360)
(345)
(728)
(132)
Change in prior service credit
(568)
(347)
Balance, March 31, 2016, net of tax
347
8,993
(2,971)
(844)
* Includes net unrealized gains attributable to businesses held for sale.
The following table presents the other comprehensive income reclassification adjustments for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively:
Unrealized Appreciation
(Depreciation) of Fixed
Maturity Investments
on Which Other-Than-
Appreciation
Foreign
Retirement
Temporary Credit
(Depreciation)
Currency
Plan
Impairments Were
of All Other
Translation
Liabilities
Recognized
Adjustments
Adjustment
Unrealized change arising during period
190
835
739
Less: Reclassification adjustments
included in net income
Total other comprehensive income (loss),
before income tax expense (benefit)
642
541
Less: Income tax expense (benefit)
(53)
net of income tax expense (benefit)
March 31, 2016
(458)
3,640
3,051
(355)
(284)
(533)
3,995
3,335
(184)
568
(40)
The following table presents the effect of the reclassification of significant items out of Accumulated other comprehensive income on the respective line items in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income:
Amount Reclassified
from Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Income
Affected Line Item in the
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of fixed maturity securities on which other-than-temporary credit impairments were recognized
Other realized capital gains
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of
all other investments
140
(413)
Deferred policy acquisition costs adjustment
Future policy benefits
Prior-service costs
*
Actuarial losses
Total reclassifications for the period
* These Accumulated other comprehensive income components are included in the computation of net periodic pension cost. See Note 14 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
13. Earnings Per Share (EPS)
The basic EPS computation is based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding, adjusted to reflect all stock dividends and stock splits. The diluted EPS computation is based on those shares used in the basic EPS computation plus shares that would have been outstanding assuming issuance of common shares for all dilutive potential common shares outstanding and adjusted to reflect all stock dividends and stock splits.
The following table presents the computation of basic and diluted EPS:
Numerator for EPS:
Less: Net income from continuing operations attributable to noncontrolling interests
Income (loss) attributable to AIG common shareholders from continuing operations
(136)
Net income (loss) attributable to AIG common shareholders
Denominator for EPS:
Weighted average shares outstanding — basic
Dilutive shares
24,537,787
Weighted average shares outstanding — diluted(a) (b)
Income (loss) attributable to AIG
(a) Shares in the diluted EPS calculation represent basic shares for the three-month period ended March 31, 2016 due to the net loss in that period.
(b) Dilutive shares include our share‑based employee compensation plans and a weighted average portion of the warrants issued to AIG shareholders as part of AIG’s recapitalization in January 2011. The number of shares excluded from diluted shares outstanding was 1.8 million and 0.6 million for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, because the effect of including those shares in the calculation would have been anti-dilutive.
14. Employee Benefits
We sponsor various defined benefit pension plans, post-retirement medical and life insurance plans for eligible employees and retirees in the U.S. and certain non-U.S. countries.
The following table presents the components of net periodic benefit cost with respect to pensions and other postretirement benefits:
Pension
Postretirement
U.S.
Non-U.S.
Plans
Components of net periodic benefit cost:
Service cost
Interest cost
Expected return on assets
(70)
Amortization of net loss
Net periodic benefit cost (credit)
(80)
Amortization of prior service credit
Curtailment gain
15. Income Taxes
Interim Tax Calculation Method
We use the estimated annual effective tax rate method in computing our interim tax provision. Certain items, including those deemed to be unusual, infrequent or that cannot be reliably estimated, are excluded from the estimated annual effective tax rate. In these cases, the actual tax expense or benefit is reported in the same period as the related item. Certain tax effects are also not reflected in the estimated annual effective tax rate, primarily certain changes in the realizability of deferred tax assets and uncertain tax positions.
Interim Tax Expense (Benefit)
For the three-month period ended March 31, 2017, the effective tax rate on income from continuing operations was 29.9 percent. The effective tax rate on income from continuing operations differs from the statutory tax rate of 35 percent primarily due to tax benefits associated with tax exempt income, reclassifications from accumulated other comprehensive income to income from continuing operations related to the disposal of available for sale securities and excess tax deductions related to share based compensation payments recorded through the income statement in accordance with ASU 2016-09, partially offset by tax charges related to the disposition of subsidiaries and non-deductible transfer pricing charges.
For the three-month period ended March 31, 2016, the effective tax rate on loss from continuing operations was 27.1 percent. The effective tax rate on loss from continuing operations differs from the statutory tax rate of 35 percent primarily due to tax charges and related interest associated with increases in uncertain tax positions related to cross border financing transactions, partially offset by tax benefits associated with the impact of an agreement reached with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) related to certain tax issues under audit, reclassifications from accumulated other comprehensive income to income from continuing operations related to the disposal of available for sale securities and a decrease in the deferred tax asset valuation allowances associated with certain foreign jurisdictions.
Assessment of Deferred Tax Asset Valuation Allowance
The evaluation of the recoverability of our deferred tax asset and the need for a valuation allowance requires us to weigh all positive and negative evidence to reach a conclusion that it is more likely than not that all or some portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. The weight given to the evidence is commensurate with the extent to which it can be objectively verified. The more negative evidence that exists, the more positive evidence is necessary and the more difficult it is to support a conclusion that a valuation allowance is not needed.
Our framework for assessing the recoverability of the deferred tax asset requires us to consider all available evidence, including:
• the nature, frequency, and amount of cumulative financial reporting income and losses in recent years;
• the sustainability of recent operating profitability of our subsidiaries;
• the predictability of future operating profitability of the character necessary to realize the net deferred tax asset;
• the carryforward period for the net operating loss, capital loss and foreign tax credit carryforwards, including the effect of reversing taxable temporary differences; and
• prudent and feasible actions and tax planning strategies that would be implemented, if necessary, to protect against the loss of the deferred tax asset.
In performing our assessment of the recoverability of the deferred tax asset under this framework, we consider tax laws governing the utilization of the net operating loss, capital loss and foreign tax credit carryforwards in each applicable jurisdiction. Under U.S. tax law, a company generally must use its net operating loss carryforwards before it can use its foreign tax credit carryforwards, even though the carryforward period for the foreign tax credit is shorter than for the net operating loss. Our U.S. federal consolidated income tax group includes both life companies and non-life companies. While the U.S. taxable income of our non-life companies can be offset by the net operating loss carryforwards, only a portion (no more than 35 percent) of the U.S. taxable income of our life companies can be offset by those net operating loss carryforwards. The remaining tax liability of our life companies can be offset by the foreign tax credit carryforwards. Accordingly, we utilize both the net operating loss and foreign tax credit carryforwards concurrently which enables us to realize our tax attributes prior to expiration. As of March 31, 2017, based on all available evidence, it is more likely than not that the U.S. net operating loss and foreign tax credit carryforwards will be utilized prior to expiration and, thus, no valuation allowance has been established.
Estimates of future taxable income, including income generated from prudent and feasible actions and tax planning strategies could change in the near term, perhaps materially, which may require us to consider any potential impact to our assessment of the recoverability of the deferred tax asset. Such potential impact could be material to our consolidated financial condition or results of operations for an individual reporting period.
For the three-month period ended March 31, 2017, recent changes in market conditions, including interest rate fluctuations, impacted the unrealized tax gains and losses in the U.S. Life Insurance Companies’ available for sale securities portfolio, resulting in a decrease to the net deferred tax asset related to net unrealized tax capital losses. As a result, for the three-month period ended March 31, 2017, we released $254 million of valuation allowance associated with the unrealized tax losses in the U.S. Life Insurance Companies’ available for sale securities portfolio, all of which was allocated to other comprehensive income.
For the three-month period ended March 31, 2017, recent changes in market conditions, including interest rate fluctuations, impacted the unrealized tax gains and losses in the non-life companies’ available for sale securities portfolio, resulting in a decrease to the net deferred tax asset related to net unrealized tax capital losses. As a result, we released $120 million of valuation allowance associated with the unrealized tax losses in the non-life companies’ available for sale securities portfolio, all of which was recognized in other comprehensive income.
As of March 31, 2017, based on all available evidence, we concluded that a valuation allowance of $354 million should remain on a portion of the deferred tax asset related to unrealized losses that are not more-likely-than-not to be realized.
During the three-month period ended March 31, 2017, we recognized a net decrease of $15 million in our deferred tax asset valuation allowance associated with certain foreign jurisdictions, primarily attributable to current year activity.
During the three-month period ended March 31, 2017, our deferred tax asset valuation allowance associated with certain state jurisdictions remained unchanged.
Tax Examinations and Litigation
On August 1, 2012, we filed a motion for partial summary judgment related to the disallowance of foreign tax credits associated with cross border financing transactions in the Southern District of New York. The Southern District of New York denied our summary judgment motion and upon AIG’s appeal, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (the Second Circuit) affirmed the denial. AIG’s petition for certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court from the decision of the Second Circuit was denied on March 7, 2016. As a result, the case has been remanded back to the Southern District of New York for a jury trial.
We will vigorously defend our position and continue to believe that we have adequate reserves for any liability that could result from these government actions. We continue to monitor legal and other developments in this area, including recent decisions affecting other taxpayers, and evaluate their effect, if any, on our position.
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
At both March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, our unrecognized tax benefits, excluding interest and penalties were $4.5 billion. At both March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, our unrecognized tax benefits related to tax positions that, if recognized, would not affect the effective tax rate because they relate to such factors as the timing, rather the permissibility, of the deduction were $0.1 billion. Accordingly, at both March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the amounts of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would favorably affect the effective tax rate were $4.4 billion.
Interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits are recognized in income tax expense. At March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, we had accrued liabilities of $1.3 billion and $1.2 billion, respectively, for the payment of interest (net of the federal benefit) and penalties. For the three-month periods ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, we accrued expense (benefit) of $17 million and $(51) million, respectively, for the payment of interest and penalties.
We regularly evaluate adjustments proposed by taxing authorities. At March 31, 2017, such proposed adjustments would not have resulted in a material change to our consolidated financial condition, although it is possible that the effect could be material to our consolidated results of operations for an individual reporting period. Although it is reasonably possible that a change in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits may occur within the next 12 months, based on the information currently available, we do not expect any change to be material to our consolidated financial condition.
16. Information Provided in Connection with Outstanding Debt
The following Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements reflect the results of AIG Life Holdings, Inc. (AIGLH), a holding company and a wholly owned subsidiary of AIG. AIG provides a full and unconditional guarantee of all outstanding debt of AIGLH.
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets
American
International
Reclassifications
Group, Inc.
Consolidated
(As Guarantor)
AIGLH
Eliminations
AIG
2,714
12,907
(4,548)
Other investments(a)
7,032
297,400
304,432
9,746
310,307
1,905
Loans to subsidiaries(b)
34,849
394
(35,243)
Investment in consolidated subsidiaries(b)
43,916
28,102
(72,018)
Other assets, including deferred income taxes
21,824
630
158,303
(4,606)
176,151
110,337
28,743
477,497
(116,415)
Insurance liabilities
274,967
21,471
8,634
Other liabilities, including intercompany balances(a)
14,402
571
108,364
(9,327)
114,010
Loans from subsidiaries(b)
395
34,848
36,268
1,213
432,584
(44,570)
27,530
44,315
(71,845)
44,913
4,424
13,218
(5,340)
7,154
308,719
315,873
11,578
321,937
1,832
34,692
576
(35,268)
42,582
27,309
(69,891)
24,099
140,743
(4,059)
161,022
112,953
27,582
472,287
(114,558)
275,120
21,405
8,865
14,671
103,975
(9,572)
109,268
577
34,691
36,653
428,757
(44,840)
26,746
42,972
(69,718)
43,530
(a) Includes intercompany derivative positions, which are reported at fair value before credit valuation adjustment.
(b) Eliminated in consolidation.
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Income
Equity in earnings of consolidated subsidiaries*
1,462
600
(2,062)
12,382
1,658
(2,008)
Expenses:
Gain on extinguishment of debt
Other expenses
335
10,325
10,608
Total expenses
10,370
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income tax
expense (benefit)
1,081
587
2,012
(1,953)
(104)
624
591
1,388
1,362
(944)
(1,683)
2,627
(63)
12,038
(201)
(1,007)
(1,678)
2,426
Loss on extinguishment of debt
11,605
(199)
11,604
512
11,660
(200)
(1,519)
(1,699)
2,626
(1,337)
1,285
(182)
(1,693)
(907)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
(933)
* Eliminated in consolidation.
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Comprehensive Income
4,660
(55,690)
Comprehensive income (loss)
5,251
52,418
(57,643)
Total comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to AIG
52,392
(474)
55,554
(55,080)
(2,167)
54,601
(52,454)
Total comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
54,621
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows
Subsidiaries*
Eliminations*
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities
651
(10,938)
Sales of investments
2,699
26,492
(2,482)
26,709
Sales of divested businesses, net
Purchase of investments
(890)
(14,769)
2,482
(13,177)
Loans to subsidiaries - net
(127)
Contributions from (to) subsidiaries - net
(206)
1,470
(220)
(292)
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
3,424
11,396
Intercompany loans - net
127
Cash dividends paid
89
295
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
(4,075)
Change in cash
1,483
(1,481)
(1,067)
17,004
(1,154)
16,242
(322)
(16,634)
1,154
(15,802)
880
(1,060)
644
(644)
(1,022)
445
1,644
(1,704)
2,986
303
(710)
(222)
(877)
1,060
(177)
1,067
1,500
(1,926)
(186)
2,771
1,479
1,456
Supplementary Disclosure of Condensed Consolidating Cash Flow Information
Cash (paid) received during the 2017 period for:
Interest:
Third party
(288)
(43)
(354)
Intercompany
Taxes:
Income tax authorities
(68)
(1,090)
Cash (paid) received during the 2016 period for:
(285)
182
American International Group, Inc. (As Guarantor) supplementary disclosure of non-cash activities:
Intercompany non-cash financing and investing activities:
Capital contributions
2,904
Dividends received in the form of securities
697
Fixed maturity securities received in exchange for equity securities
17. Subsequent Events
Dividends Declared and Increase in Share Repurchase Authorization
On May 3, 2017, our Board of Directors declared a cash dividend on AIG Common Stock of $0.32 per share, payable on June 28, 2017 to shareholders of record on June 14, 2017.
On May 3, 2017, our Board of Directors authorized an additional increase to its previous repurchase authorization of AIG Common Stock of $2.5 billion, resulting in an aggregate remaining authorization on such date of approximately $3.8 billion.
sales of businesses
See Note 4 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for details of recent transactions that have closed since March 31, 2017.
ITEM 2 | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Glossary and Acronyms of Selected Insurance Terms and References
Throughout this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A), we use certain terms and abbreviations, which are summarized in the Glossary and Acronyms.
American International Group, Inc. (AIG) has incorporated into this discussion a number of cross-references to additional information included throughout this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the 2016 Annual Report) to assist readers seeking additional information related to a particular subject.
In this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, unless otherwise mentioned or unless the context indicates otherwise, we use the terms “AIG,” the “Company,” “we,” “us” and “our” to refer to American International Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its consolidated subsidiaries. We use the term “AIG Parent” to refer solely to American International Group, Inc., and not to any of its consolidated subsidiaries.
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and other publicly available documents may include, and officers and representatives of AIG may from time to time make, projections, goals, assumptions and statements that may constitute “forward‑looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These projections, goals, assumptions and statements are not historical facts but instead represent only our belief regarding future events, many of which, by their nature, are inherently uncertain and outside our control. These projections, goals, assumptions and statements include statements preceded by, followed by or including words such as “will,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “focused on achieving,” “view,” “target,” "goal" or “estimate.” These projections, goals, assumptions and statements may address, among other things, our:
• exposures to subprime mortgages, monoline insurers, the residential and commercial real estate markets, state and municipal bond issuers, sovereign bond issuers, the energy sector and currency exchange rates;
• exposure to European governments and European financial institutions;
• strategy for risk management;
• actual and anticipated sales of businesses or asset divestitures or monetizations;
• restructuring of business operations, including anticipated restructuring charges and annual cost savings;
• generation of deployable capital;
• strategies to increase return on equity and earnings per share;
• strategies to grow net investment income, efficiently manage capital, grow book value per common share, and reduce expenses;
• anticipated organizational and business changes;
• strategies for customer retention, growth, product development, market position, financial results and reserves;
• segments’ revenues and combined ratios; and
• Chief Executive Officer succession and management retention plans.
It is possible that our actual results and financial condition will differ, possibly materially, from the results and financial condition indicated in these projections, goals, assumptions and statements. Factors that could cause our actual results to differ, possibly materially, from those in the specific projections, goals, assumptions and statements include:
• changes in market conditions;
• negative impacts on customers, business partners and other stakeholders;
• the occurrence of catastrophic events, both natural and man-made;
• significant legal proceedings;
• the timing and applicable requirements of any new regulatory framework to which we are subject as a nonbank systemically important financial institution (SIFI) and as a global systemically important insurer (G‑SII);
• concentrations in our investment portfolios;
• actions by credit rating agencies;
• judgments concerning casualty insurance underwriting and insurance liabilities;
• our ability to successfully manage Legacy portfolios;
• our ability to successfully reduce costs and expenses and make business and organizational changes without negatively impacting client relationships or our competitive position;
• our ability to successfully dispose of, or monetize, businesses or assets;
• judgments concerning the recognition of deferred tax assets;
• judgments concerning estimated restructuring charges and estimated cost savings; and
• such other factors discussed in:
– Part I, Item 2. MD&A of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q; and
– Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors and Part II, Item 7. MD&A of our 2016 Annual Report.
We are not under any obligation (and expressly disclaim any obligation) to update or alter any projections, goals, assumptions or other statements, whether written or oral, that may be made from time to time, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
INDEX TO ITEM 2
Page
Use of Non-GAAP Measures
Critical Accounting Estimates
Executive Summary
Overview
Financial Performance Summary
69
AIG's Outlook – Industry and Economic Factors
Consolidated Results of Operations
Business Segment Operations
80
Investment Highlights in the First Quarter of 2017
Investment Strategies
Credit Ratings
118
Insurance Reserves
Loss Reserves
Life and Annuity Reserves and DAC
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Analysis of Sources and Uses of Cash
131
Liquidity and Capital Resources of AIG Parent and Subsidiaries
132
Credit Facilities
Contractual Obligations
135
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Commercial Commitments
Debt
Financial Strength Ratings
Regulation and Supervision
Dividends and Repurchases of AIG Common Stock
Dividend Restrictions
Enterprise Risk Management
Credit Risk Management
Market Risk Management
142
Liquidity Risk Management
145
Regulatory Environment
Glossary
Acronyms
Throughout this MD&A, we present our financial condition and results of operations in the way we believe will be most meaningful and representative of our business results. Some of the measurements we use are “non‑GAAP financial measures” under Securities and Exchange Commission rules and regulations. GAAP is the acronym for “generally accepted accounting principles” in the United States. The non‑GAAP financial measures we present may not be comparable to similarly‑named measures reported by other companies.
Book value per common share, excluding accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI), Book value per common share, excluding AOCI and deferred tax assets (DTA) (Adjusted book value per common share) and Adjusted book value per common share, including dividend growth are used to show the amount of our net worth on a per-share basis. We believe these measures are useful to investors because they eliminate items that can fluctuate significantly from period to period, including changes in fair value of our available for sale securities portfolio, foreign currency translation adjustments and U.S. tax attribute deferred tax assets. These measures also eliminate the asymmetrical impact resulting from changes in fair value of our available for sale securities portfolio wherein there is largely no offsetting impact for certain related insurance liabilities. We exclude deferred tax assets representing U.S. tax attributes related to net operating loss carryforwards and foreign tax credits as they have not yet been utilized. Amounts for interim periods are estimates based on projections of full-year attribute utilization. As net operating loss carryforwards and foreign tax credits are utilized, the portion of the DTA utilized is included in these book value per common share metrics. Book value per common share excluding AOCI, is derived by dividing total AIG shareholders’ equity, excluding AOCI, by total common shares outstanding. Adjusted book value per common share is derived by dividing total AIG shareholders’ equity, excluding AOCI and DTA (Adjusted Shareholders’ Equity), by total common shares outstanding. Adjusted book value per common share including dividend growth is derived by dividing Adjusted Shareholders’ Equity, including growth in quarterly dividends above $0.125 per share to shareholders, by total common shares outstanding. The reconciliation to book value per common share, the most comparable GAAP measure, is presented in the Executive Summary section of this MD&A.
Return on equity – After-tax operating income excluding AOCI and DTA (Adjusted return on equity) is used to show the rate of return on shareholders’ equity. We believe this measure is useful to investors because it eliminates items that can fluctuate significantly from period to period, including changes in fair value of our available for sale securities portfolio, foreign currency translation adjustments and U.S. tax attribute deferred tax assets. This measure also eliminates the asymmetrical impact resulting from changes in fair value of our available for sale securities portfolio wherein there is largely no offsetting impact for certain related insurance liabilities. We exclude deferred tax assets representing U.S. tax attributes related to net operating loss carryforwards and foreign tax credits as they have not yet been utilized. Amounts for interim periods are estimates based on projections of full-year attribute utilization. As net operating loss carryforwards and foreign tax credits are utilized, the portion of the DTA utilized is included in Adjusted return on equity. Adjusted return on equity is derived by dividing actual or annualized after-tax operating income attributable to AIG by average Adjusted Shareholders’ Equity. The reconciliation to return on equity, the most comparable GAAP measure, is presented in the Executive Summary section of this MD&A.
After-tax operating income attributable to AIG is derived by excluding the tax effected pre-tax operating income (PTOI) adjustments described below and the following tax items from net income attributable to AIG:
• deferred income tax valuation allowance releases and charges; and
• uncertain tax positions and other tax items related to legacy matters having no relevance to our current businesses or operating performance.
General operating expenses, operating basis is derived by making the following adjustments to general operating and other expenses: include (i) certain loss adjustment expenses, reported as policyholder benefits and losses incurred and (ii) certain investment and other expenses reported as net investment income, and exclude (i) advisory fee expenses, (ii) non-deferrable insurance commissions, (iii) direct marketing and acquisition expenses, net of deferrals, (iv) non-operating litigation reserves and (v) other expense related to an asbestos retroactive reinsurance agreement. We use General operating expenses, operating basis, because we believe it provides a more meaningful indication of our ordinary course of business operating costs, regardless of within which financial statement line item these expenses are reported externally within our segment results. The majority of these expenses are employee-related costs. For example, Other acquisition expenses and Losses and loss adjustment expenses primarily represent employee-related costs in the underwriting and claims functions, respectively. Excluded from this measure are non-operating expenses (such as restructuring costs and litigation reserves), direct marketing expenses, insurance company assessments and non-deferrable commissions.
We use the following operating performance measures because we believe they enhance the understanding of the underlying profitability of continuing operations and trends of our business segments. We believe they also allow for more meaningful comparisons with our insurance competitors. When we use these measures, reconciliations to the most comparable GAAP measure are provided on a consolidated basis in the Results of Operations section of this MD&A.
Operating revenuesexclude Net realized capital gains (losses), income from non-operating litigation settlements (included in Other income for GAAP purposes) and changes in fair value of securities used to hedge guaranteed living benefits (included in Net investment income for GAAP purposes). Operating revenues is a GAAP measure for our operating segments.
Pre-tax operating income is derived by excluding the following items from income from continuing operations before income tax. This definition is consistent across our modules (including geography). These items generally fall into one or more of the following broad categories: legacy matters having no relevance to our current businesses or operating performance; adjustments to enhance transparency to the underlying economics of transactions; and measures that we believe to be common to the industry. PTOI is a GAAP measure for our operating segments.
• changes in fair value of securities used to hedge guaranteed living benefits;
• changes in benefit reserves and deferred policy acquisition costs (DAC), value of business acquired (VOBA), and sales inducement assets (SIA) related to net realized capital gains and losses;
• loss (gain) on extinguishment of debt;
• net realized capital gains and losses;
• non‑qualifying derivative hedging activities, excluding net realized capital gains and losses;
• income or loss from discontinued operations;
• net loss reserve discount benefit (charge);
• pension expense related to a one-time lump sum payment to former employees;
• income and loss from divested businesses;
• non-operating litigation reserves and settlements;
• reserve development related to non-operating run-off insurance business;
• restructuring and other costs related to initiatives designed to reduce operating expenses, improve efficiency and simplify our organization; and
• the portion of favorable or unfavorable prior year reserve development for which we have ceded the risk under retroactive reinsurance agreements and related changes in amortization of the deferred gain.
· Commercial Insurance: Liability and Financial Lines, Property and Special Risks; Consumer Insurance: Personal Insurance
– Ratios: We, along with most property and casualty insurance companies, use the loss ratio, the expense ratio and the combined ratio as measures of underwriting performance. These ratios are relative measurements that describe, for every $100 of net premiums earned, the amount of losses and loss adjustment expenses (which for Commercial Insurance excludes net loss reserve discount), and the amount of other underwriting expenses that would be incurred. A combined ratio of less than 100 indicates underwriting income and a combined ratio of over 100 indicates an underwriting loss. Our ratios are calculated using the relevant segment information calculated under GAAP, and thus may not be comparable to similar ratios calculated for regulatory reporting purposes. The underwriting environment varies across countries and products, as does the degree of litigation activity, all of which affect such ratios. In addition, investment returns, local taxes, cost of capital, regulation, product type and competition can have an effect on pricing and consequently on profitability as reflected in underwriting income and associated ratios.
– Accident year loss and combined ratios, as adjusted: both the accident year loss and combined ratios, as adjusted, exclude catastrophe losses and related reinstatement premiums, prior year development, net of premium adjustments, and the impact of reserve discounting. Natural catastrophe losses are generally weather or seismic events having a net impact on AIG in excess of $10 million each. Catastrophes also include certain man-made events, such as terrorism and civil disorders that meet the $10 million threshold. We believe the as adjusted ratios are meaningful measures of our underwriting results on an ongoing basis as they exclude catastrophes and the impact of reserve discounting which are outside of management’s control. We also exclude prior year development to provide transparency related to current accident year results.
· Consumer Insurance: Individual Retirement, Group Retirement, and Life Insurance; Other Operations: Institutional Markets
– Premiums and deposits:includes direct and assumed amounts received and earned on traditional life insurance policies, group benefit policies and life‑contingent payout annuities, as well as deposits received on universal life, investment‑type annuity contracts and mutual funds.
Results from discontinued operations are excluded from all of these measures.
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires the application of accounting policies that often involve a significant degree of judgment.
The accounting policies that we believe are most dependent on the application of estimates and assumptions, which are critical accounting estimates, are related to the determination of:
· loss reserves;
· reinsurance assets;
· valuation of future policy benefit liabilities and timing and extent of loss recognition;
· valuation of liabilities for guaranteed benefit features of variable annuity products;
· estimated gross profits to value deferred acquisition costs for investment-oriented products;
· impairment charges, including other-than-temporary impairments on available for sale securities, impairments on other invested assets, including investments in life settlements, and goodwill impairment;
· liability for legal contingencies;
· fair value measurements of certain financial assets and liabilities; and
· income tax assets and liabilities, including recoverability of our net deferred tax asset and the predictability of future tax operating profitability of the character necessary to realize the net deferred tax assets.
These accounting estimates require the use of assumptions about matters, some of which are highly uncertain at the time of estimation. To the extent actual experience differs from the assumptions used, our consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be materially affected. For a complete discussion of our critical accounting estimates, you should read Part II, Item 7. MD&A — Critical Accounting Estimates in the 2016 Annual Report.
This overview of the MD&A highlights selected information and may not contain all of the information that is important to current or potential investors in our securities. You should read this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, together with the 2016 Annual Report, in their entirety for a more detailed description of events, trends, uncertainties, risks and critical accounting estimates affecting us.
OUR MODULAR MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK
AIG’s operating model
Modules are designed to enhance transparency and accountability, which we anticipate will drive operating improvement and flexibility over time.
Our Core businesses include Commercial Insurance and Consumer Insurance, as well as Other Operations. Commercial Insurance includes two modules – Liability and Financial Lines and Property and Special Risks. Consumer Insurance is comprised of four modules – Individual Retirement, Group Retirement, Life Insurance and Personal Insurance. As we continue to focus on operating improvement, we are exiting certain lines of business and market regions that we consider non-core and unprofitable while still maintaining a global presence for our Core businesses. The Legacy Portfolio consists of our run-off insurance lines and legacy investments. Other Operations consists of businesses and items not attributed to our Commercial Insurance and Consumer Insurance modules or our Legacy Portfolio.
Our multinational capabilities provide a diverse mix of businesses through our global offices and branches in more than 80 countries and jurisdictions. Accordingly, we also review and assess the performance of our Core business through the broad locations of our insurance operations across three key geographic modules: the United States, Europe, and Japan. Our disclosure of geography is based on the significant legal entity insurance companies (including branches) operating in those geographic areas. The other geography includes AIG Parent, United Guaranty Residential Insurance Company (United Guaranty), AIG Fuji Life Insurance Company, Ltd. (Fuji Life), our insurance operations in remaining geographies around the globe and certain legal entities not deemed significant in the key geographic areas. Geography disclosures exclude our Legacy Portfolio.
Business Modules
Commercial Insurance is a leading provider of insurance products and services for commercial customers. It includes one of the world’s most far-reaching property casualty networks. Commercial Insurance offers a broad range of products to customers through a diversified, multichannel distribution network. Customers value Commercial Insurance’s strong capital position, extensive risk management and claims expertise, and its ability to be a market leader in critical lines of the insurance business.
Consumer Insurance is a unique franchise that brings together a broad portfolio of retirement, life insurance and personal insurance products offered through multiple distribution networks. It holds long-standing, leading market positions in many of its U.S. product lines, and its global footprint provides the opportunity to leverage its multinational servicing capabilities and pursue select opportunities in attractive markets. With its strong capital position, customer-focused service, innovative product development capabilities and deep distribution relationships across multiple channels, Consumer Insurance is well positioned to provide clients with valuable solutions, delivered through the channels they prefer.
Other Operations consists of businesses and items not attributed to our Commercial and Consumer modules or our Legacy Portfolio. It includes AIG Parent, Institutional Markets, United Guaranty(a), Fuji Life(b), deferred tax assets related to tax attributes and intercompany eliminations.
(a) United Guaranty was sold in December 31, 2016.
(b) Fuji Life was sold on April 30, 2017.
Legacy Portfolio includes Legacy Property and Casualty Run-Off Insurance Lines, Legacy Life Insurance Run-Off Lines and Legacy Investments.
Geography Modules
United States
includes the following major property and casualty and life insurance companies: National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. (National Union), American Home Assurance Company (American Home U.S.), Lexington Insurance Company (Lexington), American General Life Insurance Company (American General), The Variable Annuity Life Insurance Company (VALIC), and the United States Life Insurance Company in the City of New York (U.S. Life).
Europe
includes AIG Europe Limited and its branches, which are property and casualty companies.
Japan
includes the following major property and casualty insurance companies: Fuji Fire and Marine Insurance Company (Fuji Fire), AIUI Japan, and American Home Assurance Company, Ltd. (American Home Japan).
Net Income (Loss) Attributable To AIG
($ in millions)
2017 and 2016 Comparison
Increased due to improved income from insurance operations, reflecting higher net investment income and lower general operating and other expenses. Income from the Legacy Portfolio increased due to fair value gains on certain investments. In addition, net realized capital losses decreased significantly compared to the same period in the prior year.
See MD&A – Consolidated Results of Operations for further discussion.
Pre-Tax Operating Income(a)
Increased due to improved income from insurance operations, reflecting higher net investment income and lower general operating and other expenses. Income from the Legacy Portfolio increased due to fair value gains on certain investments.
See MD&A – Business Segment Operations for further discussion.
General Operating and Other Expenses
Declined $560 million, including an unfavorable foreign exchange impact of $12 million, divestitures of businesses, including United Guaranty and AIG Advisor Group, and lower employee-related expenses, rationalized employee benefits and professional fee reductions related to our ongoing efficiency program.
In keeping with our broad and on-going efforts to transform for long-term competitiveness, results for the first quarters of 2017 and 2016 included approximately $181 million and $188 million of pre-tax restructuring and other costs, respectively, which were primarily comprised of employee severance charges.
We continue to execute initiatives focused on organizational simplification, operational efficiency, and business rationalization, which are expected to result in aggregate pre-tax restructuring and other costs of approximately $1.44 billion (of which approximately $1.37 billion has been recognized since the third quarter of 2015) as well as generate pre-tax annualized savings of approximately $1.4 billion to $1.5 billion when fully implemented by 2018.
General Operating Expenses, Operating Basis(a)
Declined $343 million, including an unfavorable foreign exchange impact of $12 million, divestitures of businesses, including United Guaranty and AIG Advisor Group, lower employee-related expenses, rationalized employee benefits and professional fee reductions related to our ongoing efficiency program.
Capital Returned to Shareholders
($ in billions)
We have returned $17.0 billion in capital to our shareholders through dividends and share and warrant repurchases since January 1, 2016 through March 31, 2017 as part of our strategy to actively return capital to shareholders.
Return on Equity(b)
Adjusted Return on Equity(a)(b)
Book Value Per Common Share
Adjusted Book Value Per Common Share Including Dividend Growth(a)
(a) Non-GAAP measure – see Consolidated Results of Operations for reconciliation of Non-GAAP to GAAP measure.
(b) For the three-month periods ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, and year ended December 31, 2016.
AIG PRIORITIES FOR 2017
As previously disclosed in our 2016 Annual Report, our primary focus is growth in intrinsic value. We believe the following priorities for 2017 will help us to achieve our value creation goals.
• Improving our return on equity (ROE)
• Providing innovative solutions to most efficiently meet our clients’ needs
• Continuing to reduce general operating expenses
• Improving profitability of Commercial Insurance through underwriting actions and accident year loss ratio improvements
AIG’s Outlook – Industry and economic factors
Our business is affected by industry and economic factors such as interest rates, currency exchange rates, credit and equity market conditions, catastrophic claims events, regulation, tax policy, competition, and general economic, market and political conditions. We continued to operate under difficult market conditions in the first quarter of 2017, characterized by factors such as historically low interest rates, the Department of Labor’s (the DOL) final fiduciary duty rule (the DOL Fiduciary Rule), instability in the global equity markets, volatile energy markets, slowing growth in China and Euro-Zone economies, and the formal commencement of the United Kingdom’s (the UK) withdrawal from its membership in the European Union (the EU) (commonly referred to as Brexit). Brexit has also affected the U.S. dollar/British pound exchange rate, increased the volatility of exchange rates among the euro, British pound and the Japanese yen (the Major Currencies), and created volatility in the financial markets, which may continue for some time.
Impact of Changes in the Interest Rate Environment
Interest rates decreased marginally in the first quarter of 2017 and have remained at historically low levels. Certain markets in which we operate have experienced negative interest rates. A sustained low interest rate environment negatively affects sales of interest rate sensitive products in our industry and may negatively impact the profitability of our existing business as we reinvest cash flows from investments, including increased calls and prepayments of fixed maturity securities and mortgage loans, at rates below the average yield of our existing portfolios. We actively manage our exposure to the interest rate environment through portfolio selection and asset-liability management, including spread management strategies for our investment-oriented products and economic hedging of interest rate risk from guarantee features in our variable and fixed index annuities.
Annuity Sales and Surrenders
The sustained low interest rate environment has a significant impact on the annuity industry. Low long-term interest rates put pressure on investment returns, which may negatively affect sales of interest rate sensitive products and reduce future profits on certain existing fixed rate products. However, our disciplined rate setting has helped to mitigate some of the pressure on investment spreads. As long as the low interest rate environment continues, conditions will be challenging for the fixed annuity market. Rapidly rising interest rates could create the potential for increased sales, but may also drive higher surrenders. Customers are, however, currently buying fixed annuities with surrender periods of four to seven years in pursuit of higher returns, which may help mitigate the rate of increase in surrenders in a rapidly rising rate environment. In addition, older contracts that have higher minimum interest rates and continue to be attractive to the contract holders have driven better than expected persistency in Fixed Annuities, although the reserves for such contracts have continued to decrease over time in amount and as a percentage of the total annuity portfolio. We will closely monitor surrenders of Fixed Annuities as contracts with lower minimum interest rates come out of the surrender charge period in a more attractive rate environment. Low interest rates have also driven growth in our fixed index annuity products, which provide additional interest crediting tied to favorable performance in certain equity market indices and the availability of guaranteed living benefits. Changes in interest rates significantly impact the valuation of our liabilities for guaranteed products with income features and the value of the related hedging portfolio.
Reinvestment and Spread Management
We actively monitor fixed income markets, including the level of interest rates, credit spreads and the shape of the yield curve. We also frequently review our interest rate assumptions and actively manage the crediting rates used for new and in-force business. Business strategies continue to evolve to maintain profitability of the overall business in a historically low interest rate environment. The low interest rate environment makes it more difficult to profitably price many of our products and puts margin pressure on existing products, due to the challenge of investing recurring premiums and deposits and reinvesting investment portfolio cash flows in the low rate environment while maintaining satisfactory investment quality and liquidity. In addition, there is investment risk associated with future premium receipts from certain in‑force business. Specifically, the investment of these future premium receipts may be at a yield below that required to meet future policy liabilities.
The contractual provisions for renewal of crediting rates and guaranteed minimum crediting rates included in products may reduce spreads in a sustained low interest rate environment and thus reduce future profitability. Although this interest rate risk is partially mitigated through the asset‑liability management process, product design elements and crediting rate strategies, a sustained low interest rate environment may negatively affect future profitability.
The following table presents Fixed Annuities and Group Retirement base net investment spread:
Base net investment spread
Fixed Annuities
2.27
2.22
1.88
2.00
In Fixed Annuities and Group Retirement, average interest crediting rates decreased slightly in the first quarter of 2017 compared to the same period in the prior year due to disciplined pricing and active crediting rate management. Group Retirement’s base net investment spread decreased in the first quarter of 2017 compared to the same period in the prior year as a result of lower prepayment income received on commercial mortgage loans, which more than offset the decrease in crediting rate. See Investments for additional information on our investment and asset-liability management strategies.
For investment-oriented products in our Individual Retirement, Group Retirement, Life Insurance and Institutional Markets businesses, our spread management strategies include disciplined pricing and product design for new business, modifying or limiting the sale of products that do not achieve targeted spreads, using asset-liability management to match assets to liabilities to the extent practicable, and actively managing crediting rates to help mitigate some of the pressure on investment spreads. Renewal crediting rate management is done under contractual provisions that were designed to allow crediting rates to be reset at pre-established intervals in accordance with state and federal laws and subject to minimum crediting rate guarantees. We will continue to adjust crediting rates on in-force business to mitigate the pressure on spreads from declining base yields, but our ability to lower crediting rates may be limited by the competitive environment, contractual minimum crediting rates, and provisions that allow rates to be reset only at pre-established intervals. For example, competitors including private equity-held annuity writers are currently offering higher crediting rates. As a result, the timing and extent of crediting rate decreases may differ from the corresponding declines in investment yields, which could reduce our spreads and future profitability.
Of the aggregate fixed account values of our Individual Retirement and Group Retirement annuity products, 74 percent were crediting at the contractual minimum guaranteed interest rate at March 31, 2017. The percentage of fixed account values of our annuity products that are currently crediting at rates above one percent was 70 percent at both March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016. These businesses continue to focus on pricing discipline and strategies to reduce the minimum guaranteed interest crediting rates offered on new sales. In the core universal life business in our Life Insurance business, 72 percent of the account values were crediting at the contractual minimum guaranteed interest rate at March 31, 2017.
The following table presents fixed annuity and universal life account values of our Core Individual Retirement, Group Retirement and Life Insurance businesses by contractual minimum guaranteed interest rate and current crediting rates:
Current Crediting Rates
1-50 Basis
More than 50
Contractual Minimum Guaranteed
At Contractual
Points Above
Basis Points
Interest Rate
Minimum
Above Minimum
Guarantee
Individual Retirement*
1%
5,620
4,150
12,466
22,236
> 1% - 2%
1,674
9,117
> 2% - 3%
14,482
15,000
> 3% - 4%
10,659
> 4% - 5%
> 5% - 5.5%
Total Individual Retirement
38,512
4,477
14,635
57,624
Group Retirement*
1,284
2,488
6,217
6,367
665
7,175
15,513
169
15,682
919
7,130
Total Group Retirement
31,376
3,153
2,757
37,286
Universal life insurance
418
525
2,026
1,798
348
2,151
3,429
3,639
307
Total universal life insurance
6,132
1,260
1,157
8,549
76,020
8,890
18,549
103,459
Percentage of total
* Individual Retirement and Group Retirement amounts shown include fixed options within variable annuity products.
The impact of low interest rates on our Commercial Insurance segment is primarily on our long-tail Casualty line of business. We expect limited impacts on our existing long-tail Casualty business as the duration of our assets is slightly longer than that of our liabilities. We do expect sustained low interest rates will impact new and renewal business for the long-tail Casualty line as we may not be able to adjust our future pricing consistent with our profitability objectives to fully offset the impact of investing at lower rates. However, we will continue to maintain pricing discipline and risk selection.
In addition, for our Commercial Insurance segment and run-off insurance lines reported within the Legacy Portfolio, sustained low interest rates may unfavorably affect the net loss reserve discount for workers’ compensation, and to a lesser extent could favorably impact assumptions about future medical costs; the combined net effect of which could result in higher net loss reserves.
Additionally, sustained low interest rates on discounting of projected benefit cash flows for our pension plans may result in higher pension expense.
Department of Labor Fiduciary Rule
Our Individual Retirement and Group Retirement operating segments provide products and services to certain employee benefit plans that are subject to restrictions imposed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA) and the Internal Revenue Code, including the requirements of the Department of Labor’s (the DOL) final fiduciary duty rule (the DOL Fiduciary Rule), related exemption amendments, and subsequent interpretative guidance. We are prepared to implement the necessary adjustments to achieve compliance with the DOL Fiduciary Rule as it is phased in beginning June 9, 2017. Overall, the DOL Fiduciary Rule as currently promulgated would result in increased compliance costs and, as currently promulgated, may create increased exposure to legal claims under certain circumstances, including class actions.
On April 4, 2017, the DOL announced a 60-day extension of the applicability dates of the DOL Fiduciary Rule and related exemptions. This announcement followed a February 3, 2017, presidential memorandum that directed the DOL to review the DOL Fiduciary Rule and determine whether the DOL Fiduciary Rule will adversely impact the ability of retirement savers to access retirement information and financial advice. Under the terms of the DOL’s extension, the new definition of fiduciary and the impartial conduct standards under the DOL Fiduciary Rule will become effective beginning on June 9, 2017, rather than on April 10, 2017, as originally scheduled. Compliance with the remaining conditions and related exemptions is not required until January 1, 2018. The DOL also requested comments on the issues raised by the presidential memorandum, and noted its intent to complete its review and decide whether to make or propose further changes to the rule or associated exemptions in the interim. In the absence of further action by the DOL, full compliance with the DOL Fiduciary Rule will be required by January 1, 2018. We are closely following the DOL’s ongoing review and assessment of this rule.
Impact of Currency Volatility
Currency volatility remains acute, as the British pound weakened considerably against the U.S. dollar and the Japanese yen strengthened against the U.S. dollar. The euro also weakened modestly against the U.S. dollar. Such volatility affected line item components of income for those businesses with substantial international operations. In particular, growth trends in net premiums written reported in U.S. dollars can differ significantly from those measured in original currencies. The net effect on underwriting results, however, is significantly mitigated, as both revenues and expenses are similarly affected.
These currencies may continue to fluctuate, in either direction, especially as a result of the UK’s announced exit from the EU, and such fluctuations will affect net premiums written growth trends reported in U.S. dollars, as well as financial statement line item comparability.
Liability and Financial Lines, Property and Special Risks, International Life Insurance and Personal Insurance businesses are transacted in most major foreign currencies. The following table presents the average of the quarterly weighted average exchange rates of the Major Currencies, which have the most significant impact on our businesses:
Percentage
Rate for 1 USD
Change
Currency:
JPY
114.68
118.15
EUR
0.94
0.91
GBP
0.80
0.69
Unless otherwise noted, references to the effects of foreign exchange in the Commercial Insurance and Consumer Insurance discussion of results of operations are with respect to movements in the Major Currencies included in the preceding table.
The following section provides a comparative discussion of our Consolidated Results of Operations on a reported basis for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2017 and 2016. Factors that relate primarily to a specific business are discussed in more detail within the business segment operations section. For a discussion of the Critical Accounting Estimates that affect our results of operations, see the Critical Accounting Estimates section of this MD&A and Part II, Item 7. MD&A — Critical Accounting Estimates in the 2016 Annual Report.
The following table presents our consolidated results of operations and other key financial metrics:
NM
Income (loss) from continuing operations before
income tax expense (benefit)
Loss from discontinued operations,
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests
(in millions, except per share data)
Balance sheet data:
Book value per common share
78.59
76.66
Book value per common share, excluding AOCI
74.58
73.41
Adjusted book value per common share
59.10
58.57
Adjusted book value per common share, including dividend growth
60.59
59.79
The following table presents a reconciliation of Book value per common share to Book value per common share, excluding AOCI, Book value per common share, excluding AOCI and DTA (Adjusted book value per common share), and Adjusted book value per common share, including dividend growth, which are non-GAAP measures. See Use of Non‑GAAP Measures for additional information.
Total AIG shareholders' equity
Total AIG shareholders' equity, excluding AOCI
70,288
73,070
Deferred tax assets
14,585
14,770
Adjusted shareholders' equity
55,703
58,300
Add: Cumulative quarterly common stock dividends above $0.125 per share
1,216
Adjusted shareholders' equity, including dividend growth
57,108
59,516
Total common shares outstanding
The following table presents a reconciliation of Return on equity to Adjusted Return on equity, which is a non-GAAP measure. See Use of Non‑GAAP Measures for additional information.
Three Months Ended
Year Ended
Actual or annualized net income (loss) attributable to AIG
4,740
(732)
(849)
Actual or annualized after-tax operating income attributable to AIG
5,468
3,060
406
Average AIG Shareholders' equity
75,185
89,088
86,617
Average AOCI
3,506
4,031
5,722
Average AIG Shareholders' equity, excluding average AOCI
71,679
85,057
80,895
Average DTA
14,678
16,788
15,905
Average adjusted AIG Shareholders' equity
57,001
68,269
64,990
ROE
6.3
(0.8)
(1.0)
Adjusted Return on Equity
9.6
4.5
0.6
The following table presents a reconciliation of General operating and other expenses to General operating expense, operating basis, which is a Non-GAAP measure:
Other (income) expense related to retroactive reinsurance agreement
Pension expense related to a one-time lump sum payment to former employees
Non-operating litigation reserves
Total general operating and other expenses included in pre-tax operating income
2,258
2,819
Loss adjustment expenses, reported as policyholder benefits and losses incurred
304
341
Advisory fee expenses
(77)
Non-deferrable insurance commissions
(122)
Direct marketing and acquisition expenses, net of deferrals
(144)
Investment expenses reported as net investment income and other
Total general operating expenses, operating basis
2,249
2,592
The following table presents a reconciliation of pre-tax income/net income (loss) attributable to AIG to pre-tax operating income/after-tax operating income attributable to AIG:
Total Tax
(Benefit)
After
Pre-tax
Charge
Tax
Pre-tax income/net income (loss), including noncontrolling interests
1,206
Noncontrolling interest
Pre-tax income/net income (loss) attributable to AIG
Uncertain tax positions and other tax adjustments
(205)
Deferred income tax valuation allowance releases
Changes in fair value of securities used to hedge guaranteed living benefits
Changes in benefit reserves and DAC, VOBA and SIA related to net realized capital
gains (losses)
Unfavorable (favorable) prior year development and related amortization changes ceded
under retroactive reinsurance agreements
1,106
387
719
Noncontrolling interest on net realized capital losses
106
Pre-tax operating income/After-tax operating income
653
1,367
765
Weighted average diluted shares outstanding
1,005.3
1,156.5
Income (loss) per common share attributable to AIG (diluted)
After-tax operating income per common share attributable to AIG (diluted)*
1.36
0.64
* For the quarter ended March 31, 2016, because we reported a net loss, all common stock equivalents are anti-dilutive and are therefore excluded from the calculation of diluted shares and diluted per share amounts. However, because we reported after-tax operating income, the calculation of after-tax operating income per diluted share includes 29,585,064 dilutive shares.
first quarter pre-tax income (LOSS) Comparison for 2017 and 2016
Pre-tax results increased in the first quarter of 2017 compared to the same period in 2016 primarily due to:
• an increase in net investment income due to higher income on alternative investments, primarily in our hedge fund portfolio;
• lower general operating and other expenses reflecting strategic actions to reduce expenses;
• a decrease in net realized capital losses reflecting:
– foreign exchange losses in the first quarter of 2016 due to $483 million of remeasurement losses for a short-term intercompany balance;
– losses on sales of fixed maturity securities in the energy sector in the first quarter of 2016;
– higher other-than-temporary impairments in the first quarter of 2016;
– partially offset by derivative and hedge accounting losses in the first quarter of 2017, including losses from guaranteed living benefit embedded derivatives, net of hedging, primarily due to movement in the non-performance or “own credit “ spread adjustment (NPA), driven by tightening credit spreads;
• lower losses incurred in Commercial Insurance due to U.S. Casualty portfolio improvements and the effect of the reinsurance arrangement with Swiss Re Group; and
• higher Legacy Portfolio fair value gains on certain investments.
Income Tax expense analysis
Our business operations consist of Commercial Insurance, Consumer Insurance, Other Operations, and a Legacy Portfolio.
Commercial Insurance consists of two modules: Liability and Financial Lines and Property and Special Risks. Consumer Insurance consists of four modules: Group Retirement, Individual Retirement, Life Insurance and Personal Insurance. Other Operations consists of businesses and items not allocated to our other businesses, which are primarily AIG Parent, Institutional Markets, United Guaranty and Fuji Life. Our Legacy Portfolio consists of our Legacy Property and Casualty Run-Off Insurance Lines, Legacy Life Insurance Run-Off Lines and Legacy Investments.
The following table summarizes Pre-tax operating income from our business segment operations. See also Note 3 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Core business:
Total Core
1,651
1,127
Consolidations, eliminations and other adjustments
Pre-tax operating income
PRODUCTS AND DISTRIBUTION
Liability: Products include general liability, environmental, commercial automobile liability, workers’ compensation, excess casualty and crisis management insurance products. Casualty also includes risk- sharing and other customized structured programs for large corporate and multinational customers.
Financial Lines: Products include professional liability insurance for a range of businesses and risks, including directors and officers liability, mergers and acquisitions (M&A), fidelity, employment practices, fiduciary liability, cyber risk, kidnap and ransom, and errors and omissions insurance.
Property: Products include commercial, industrial and energy-related property insurance products and services that cover exposures to man-made and natural disasters, including business interruption.
Special Risks: Products include aerospace, political risk, trade credit, portfolio solutions, surety and marine insurance.
Distribution
Commercial Insurance products are primarily distributed through a network of independent retail and wholesale brokers.
BUSINESS STRATEGY
Customer: We provide commercial insurance solutions to the full spectrum of enterprises — from large, multinational, and mid-sized companies to small businesses, entrepreneurs, and non-profit organizations across the globe. We expect that investments in underwriting, claims services, client risk services, science and data will continue to differentiate us from our peers and drive a superior client experience.
Sharpen Commercial Focus: Create aleaner, more focused, and more profitable Commercial Insurance organization. Deliver a more competitive return on equity across our businesses primarily through improvements in our loss ratio. Optimize our business portfolio through risk selection by using enhanced data, analytics and the application of science to deliver superior risk-adjusted returns. Exit or remediate targeted sub-segments of underperforming portfolios or non-core businesses that do not meet our risk acceptance or profitability objectives. Maintain and grow profitable accounts and deliver a better client experience.
Drive Efficiency: Reorganized our operating model into “modular”, business units with greater end-to-end accountability, transparency, and strategic flexibility, enhancing decision making and driving performance improvement over time; increase capital fungibility and diversification; streamline our legal entity structure; optimize reinsurance; improve tax efficiency and reduce expenses.
Invest to Grow: Grow our higher-value businesses while investing in transformative opportunities, continuing initiatives to modernize our technology and infrastructure, advancing our engineering capabilities, innovating new products and client risk services and delivering a better client experience.
COMPETITION and challenges
Operating in a highly competitive industry, Commercial Insurance competes against several hundred companies, specialty insurance organizations, mutual companies and other underwriting organizations in the U.S. In international markets, we compete for business with the foreign insurance operations of large global insurance groups and local companies in specific market areas and product types. Insurance companies compete through a combination of risk acceptance criteria, product pricing, service and terms and conditions. Commercial Insurance seeks to distinguish itself in the insurance industry primarily based on its well-established brand, global franchise, multinational capabilities, financial and capital strength, innovative products, claims expertise to handle complex claims, expertise in providing specialized coverages and customer service.
We serve our business and individual customers on a global basis — from the largest multinational corporations to local businesses and individuals. Our clients benefit from our substantial underwriting expertise.
Our challenges include:
• information technology infrastructure modernization, which puts pressure on our efforts to reduce operating expenses;
• long-tail exposures that create added challenges to pricing and risk management;
• over capacity in certain lines of business that creates downward market pressure on pricing;
• tort environment volatility in certain jurisdictions and lines of business; and
• volatility in claims arising from natural and man-made catastrophes.
OUTLOOK—INDUSTRY AND ECONOMIC FACTORS
Below is a discussion of the industry and economic factors impacting our specific business:
The Liability and Financial Lines market remains challenging due to excess capacity, which is continuing to negatively affect the rate environment. Despite this, we continue to achieve rate increases in challenged areas of the portfolio, and more broadly across Casualty lines as we execute our portfolio optimization strategy. In the first quarter of 2017 we have continued to observe the trend of increasing frequency of severe losses, particularly in auto, which is impacting not only the primary books, but also having a leveraged impact on excess layers. Loss trends across most U.S. Casualty lines remain elevated.
Liability and Financial Lines has large international exposure within the total Commercial Insurance portfolio and will therefore remain sensitive to volatility in foreign currencies.
In the first quarter of 2017, Property and Special Risks experienced growth in certain of our targeted lines of business that led to positive results that met or exceeded our expectations and we expect such growth to continue throughout 2017. The U.S. large limit property business continues to be a strategic focus. Rates in more commoditized lines of business such as U.S. Excess and Surplus lines continue to be unsatisfactory and we intend to continue to reduce our net premiums written in these areas.
Overall, Property and Special Risks experienced rate pressure in the first quarter of 2017, which is expected to continue in the near term, particularly in the U.S. and Europe. Property and Special Risks continues to differentiate its underwriting capacity from its peers by leveraging its global footprint, diverse product offering, risk engineering expertise and significant underwriting experience.
Primarily due to reductions in the Property portfolio driven by actions to address accounts with inadequate price and/or terms and conditions, catastrophe exposures have declined.
COMMERCIAL INSURANCE RESULTS
3,752
4,745
931
553
Total operating revenues
Benefits and expenses:
2,697
3,216
General operating and other expenses(a)
709
885
Total operating expenses
3,834
4,636
Loss ratio(b)
71.9
67.8
4.1
Acquisition ratio
15.9
16.6
(0.7)
General operating expense ratio
14.4
13.3
1.1
Expense ratio
30.3
29.9
0.4
Combined ratio(b)
102.2
97.7
Adjustments for accident year loss ratio, as adjusted and
accident year combined ratio, as adjusted:
Catastrophe losses and reinstatement premiums
(5.4)
(4.6)
Prior year development net of premium adjustments
0.3
(1.3)
Accident year loss ratio, as adjusted
65.5
63.5
2.0
Accident year combined ratio, as adjusted
95.8
93.4
2.4
(a) Includes general operating expenses, commissions and other acquisition expenses.
(b) Consistent with our definition of PTOI, excludes net loss reserve discount and the portion of favorable or unfavorable prior year reserve development for which we have ceded the risk under retroactive reinsurance agreements and related changes in amortization of the deferred gain.
The following table presents Commercial Insurance net premiums written by module, showing change on both a reported and constant dollar basis:
Percentage Change in
U.S. dollars
Original Currency
2,216
2,509
1,413
1,866
Total net premiums written
3,629
4,375
The following tables present Commercial accident year catastrophes and severe losses by geography(a) and number of events:
Catastrophes(b)
# of
Events
Windstorms and hailstorms
Tropical cyclone
Total catastrophe-related charges
164
201
222
(a) Geography shown in the table represents where the ultimate liability resides, after intercompany reinsurance agreements, and is not necessarily indicative of where the catastrophe or severe loss events have occurred. This presentation follows our geography modules. See MD&A – Executive Summary for further discussion on our geography modules.
(b) Natural catastrophe losses are generally weather or seismic events having a net impact on AIG in excess of $10 million each. Catastrophes also include certain man-made events, such as terrorism and civil disorders that meet the $10 million threshold.
Severe Losses(c)
109
(c) Severe losses are defined as non-catastrophe individual first party losses and surety losses greater than $10 million, net of related reinsurance and salvage and subrogation.
Liability and Financial Lines Results
Underwriting results:
Net premiums written
(Increase) decrease in unearned premiums
325
Net premiums earned
2,157
2,834
Losses and loss adjustment expenses incurred
1,639
1,955
Acquisition expenses:
Other acquisition expenses
101
Total acquisition expenses
313
417
General operating expenses
370
Underwriting income (loss)
(117)
691
477
Loss ratio(a)
76.0
69.0
7.0
14.5
14.7
(0.2)
14.9
13.1
1.8
29.4
27.8
1.6
Combined ratio(a)
105.4
96.8
8.6
Adjustments for accident year loss ratio, as adjusted, and accident year combined ratio, as adjusted:
(3.5)
(0.1)
(3.4)
72.5
68.9
3.6
101.9
96.7
5.2
(a) Consistent with our definition of PTOI, excludes net loss reserve discount and the portion of favorable or unfavorable prior year reserve development for which we have ceded the risk under retroactive reinsurance agreements and related changes in amortization of the deferred gain.
Business and Financial Highlights
The net premiums written decrease in the first quarter of 2017 was driven by ongoing portfolio optimization efforts and execution on our pricing strategy, partially offset by growth in targeted lines of business. The decrease in losses and loss adjustment expenses incurred was driven by lower net losses incurred resulting primarily from U.S. Casualty portfolio improvements, the effect of the reinsurance arrangement with the Swiss Re Group and the recognition of the amortization of the deferred gain from the adverse development reinsurance agreement with NICO. These decreases were partially offset by the increase in our loss reserves due to the UK Ministry of Justice’s recent decision to significantly reduce the Ogden discount rate used for calculating lump sum awards in the UK bodily injury cases. The acquisition expense decrease was primarily related to the reinsurance arrangement with the Swiss Re Group. The general operating expense decrease was mainly driven by lower employee-related expenses and other expense savings initiatives. Higher net investment income was due to higher income on alternative investments partially offset by lower interest and dividends due to lower invested assets resulting from the funding of the adverse development reinsurance agreement with NICO.
We continue to reduce the relative size of our U.S. Casualty portfolio within Liability and Financial Lines and consequently expect net premiums written will continue to decline through 2017, in large part driven by the continued execution of our risk selection strategy alongside a disciplined underwriting approach.
Liability and Financial Lines Pre-Tax Operating Income
Pre-tax operating income increased slightly due to:
• higher net investment income due to higher income on alternative investments partially offset by lower interest and dividends due to lower invested assets resulting from funding the adverse development reinsurance agreement with NICO;
• lower losses and loss adjustment expenses incurred resulting primarily from U.S. Casualty portfolio improvements, the effect of the reinsurance arrangement with the Swiss Re Group and the amortization of the deferred gain from the adverse development reinsurance agreement with NICO, partially offset by the impact of the reduction in the Ogden discount rate;
• lower acquisition expenses primarily due to the ceding commissions related to the reinsurance arrangement with the Swiss Re Group; and
• lower general operating expenses primarily due to lower employee-related expenses and other expense reduction initiatives.
These increases were almost entirely offset by lower net premiums earned primarily driven by portfolio optimization and the effect of the reinsurance arrangement with the Swiss Re Group.
Liability and Financial Lines Net Premiums Written
Net premiums written decreased primarily due to:
• continued execution of our risk selection strategy within U.S. Casualty as we optimize our product portfolio; and
• lower new and renewal business reflecting efforts to further enhance underwriting discipline in the current competitive market environment.
The decrease in net premiums written was partially offset by growth in targeted lines of business such as Global Financial Lines and Cyber.
Liability and Financial Lines Combined Ratios
The increase in combined ratio reflected an increase in both the loss ratio and the expense ratio.
The increase in the loss ratio reflected higher current accident year loss ratios in certain U.S. Casualty lines, which increased commencing in the fourth quarter of 2016 due to higher loss trend emergence identified as part of our year-end 2016 conclusions about loss reserves, partially offset by changes in business mix.
The increase in the expense ratio reflected a higher general operating expense ratio due to a decrease in net premiums earned reflecting portfolio optimization, which more than offset expense reduction.
The increase was partially offset by a lower acquisition ratio driven by higher commission income through the reinsurance arrangement with the Swiss Re Group.
Property and Special Risks Results
Increase in unearned premiums
1,595
1,911
1,058
154
283
373
240
216
66.3
66.0
17.7
19.5
(1.8)
13.7
13.6
0.1
31.4
33.1
(1.7)
99.1
(1.4)
Adjustments for accident year loss ratio, as adjusted
and accident year combined ratio, as adjusted:
(12.6)
(11.6)
2.2
1.0
1.2
55.9
55.4
0.5
87.3
88.5
(1.2)
The net premiums written decrease in the first quarter of 2017 was driven by portfolio optimization and continued challenging market conditions. Changes made to our 2017 catastrophe reinsurance program, specifically the large North American occurrence cover, have also resulted in a reduction of net premiums written. Our sale of the Ascot business at the end of 2016 is expected to result in a decline in net premiums written in 2017, although the impact on the first quarter of 2017 was minimal due to seasonality. Losses and loss adjustment expenses incurred decreased mainly due to a reduction in severe loss activity and volume, partially offset by an increase in U.S. Property attritional losses. Overall expenses decreased due to lower acquisition costs from ongoing efficiency improvements and decreased production. Higher net investment income was due to higher income on alternative investments.
Property and Special Risks Pre-Tax Operating Income
Pre-tax operating income increased primarily due to:
• higher net investment income due to higher income on alternative investments;
• lower acquisition expenses driven by change in business mix, reduced production and increased efficiency;
• lower severe losses, partially offset by an increase in U.S. Property attritional losses; and
These increases were partially offset by lower net premiums earned driven by portfolio optimization and continued challenging market conditions.
Property and Special Risks Net Premiums Written
• continued execution of our strategy to optimize our portfolio mix;
• increases in rate pressure, significant competition and challenging market conditions;
• lower new and renewal business reflecting the continued adherence to our underwriting discipline in the current competitive environment; and
• changes made to the North America Catastrophe reinsurance cover for 2017.
The decrease in net premiums written was partially offset by growth in our targeted lines of business such as Global Credit Lines, U.S. Middle Market Property and U.S. Property Construction.
Property and Special Risks Combined Ratios
The decrease in the combined ratio was due to a decrease in the expense ratio partially offset by an increase in the loss ratio.
The decrease in the expense ratio reflected:
• a lower acquisition expense ratio driven by change in business mix, the sale of the Ascot business, reduced production and increased efficiency; and
• a flat general operating expense ratio due to lower employee-related expenses and other expense reduction initiatives offset by lower premiums.
The increase in loss ratio reflected higher attritional losses in the U.S. Property business that more than offset the reduction in severe losses.
Variable Annuities: Products include variable annuities that offer a combination of growth potential, death benefit features and income protection features. Variable annuities are distributed primarily through banks, wirehouses, and regional and independent broker-dealers.
Index Annuities: Products include fixed index annuities that provide growth potential based in part on the performance of a market index. Certain fixed index annuity products offer optional income protection features. Fixed index annuities are distributed primarily through banks, broker dealers, independent marketing organizations and independent insurance agents.
Fixed Annuities: Products include single premium fixed annuities, immediate annuities and deferred income annuities. The Fixed Annuities product line maintains its industry-leading position in the U.S. bank distribution channel by designing products collaboratively with banks and offering an efficient and flexible administration platform.
Retail Mutual Funds: Includes our mutual fund sales and related administration and servicing operations. Retail Mutual Funds are distributed primarily through broker-dealers.
Group Retirement: Products and services include group mutual funds, group fixed annuities, group variable annuities, individual annuity and investment products, and financial planning and advisory services.
Products and services are marketed by The VALIC under the VALIC brand and include investment offerings and plan administrative and compliance services. VALIC career financial advisors and independent financial advisors provide retirement plan participants with enrollment support and comprehensive financial planning services.
Life Insurance: In the U.S., primarily includes term life and universal life insurance. International operations include the distribution of life and health products in the UK and Ireland. Life products in the U.S. are primarily distributed through independent marketing organizations, independent insurance agents, financial advisors and direct marketing.
Individual: Products include personal auto and property in Japan and other selected international markets and insurance for high net worth individuals offered through AIG Private Client Group, including auto, homeowners, umbrella, yacht, fine art and collections insurance, with a focus on the U.S. and multi-national coverage offerings. Products are distributed through various channels, including agents and brokers.
Group: Products include voluntary and sponsor-paid personal accident and supplemental health products for individuals, employees, associations and other organizations, a broad range of travel insurance products and services for leisure and business travelers as well as extended warranty insurance covering electronics, appliances, and HVAC industries. Products are distributed through various channels, including agents, brokers, affinity partners, airlines and travel agents.
Customer: Strive to be our clients’ most valued insurer through our unique franchise, which brings together a broad portfolio of retirement, life insurance and personal insurance products offered through multiple distribution networks. Consumer Insurance focuses on ease of doing business, offering valuable solutions, and expanding and deepening its distribution relationships across multiple channels.
Sharpen Consumer Focus: Invest in areas where Consumer Insurance can grow profitability and sustainably, and achieve and maintain industry leading positions. Narrow Consumer Insurance’s footprint in less profitable markets with insufficient scale.
Individual Retirement will continue to capitalize on the opportunity to meet consumer demand for guaranteed income by maintaining innovative variable and index annuity products, while also managing risk from guarantee features through risk-mitigating product design and well-developed economic hedging capabilities.
Our fixed annuity products provide diversity in our annuity product suite by offering stable returns for retirement savings.
Group Retirement continues to enhance its technology platform to improve the customer experience for plan sponsors and individual participants. VALIC’s self-service tools paired with its career financial advisors provide a compelling service platform.
Life Insurance continues to invest to position itself for growth, while executing on strategies to enhance returns.
Life Insurance is focused on rationalizing its product portfolio, aligning distribution with its most productive channels, consolidating systems to state-of-the-art platforms, and employing innovative underwriting enhancements.
Personal Insurance aims toprovide clients with valuable solutions, delivered through the channels they prefer. We continue to focus and invest in the most profitable markets and segments, while narrowing our footprint where appropriate.
We are also leveraging our multinational capabilities to meet the increasing demand for cross-border coverage and services. Personal Insurance will continue to use our strong risk management and market expertise to foster growth by providing innovative and competitive solutions to its customers and distributors.
Operational Effectiveness: Simplify processes and enhance operating environments to increase competitiveness, improve service and product capabilities and facilitate delivery of our target customer experience. We continue to invest in technology to improve operating efficiency and ease of doing business for our distribution partners and customers. In the U.S. Life business, we are focused on leveraging our most efficient systems and increasing automation of our underwriting process. We believe that simplifying our operating models will enhance productivity and support further profitable growth.
Balance Sheet Management: Lead a rigorous product and portfolio approach with enhanced product design and high quality investments that match our asset and liability exposures and are designed to ensure our ability to meet cash and liquidity needs under all operating scenarios.
Value Creation and Capital Management: Strive to deliver solid earnings through disciplined pricing, sustainable underwriting improvements, expense reductions, and diversification of risk, while optimizing capital allocation and efficiency within insurance entities to enhance ROE.
Consumer Insurance operates in the highly competitive insurance and financial services industry in the U.S. and select international markets and competes against various financial services companies, including mutual funds, banks and other life and property casualty insurancecompanies. Competition is primarily based on product pricing and design, distribution, financial strength, customer service and ease of doing business.
Consumer Insurance remains competitive due to its long-standing market leading positions, innovative products, distribution relationships across multiple channels, customer-focused service, multi-national capabilities and strong financial ratings.
Our primary challenges include:
· a sustained low interest rate environment, which makes it difficult to profitably price new products and puts margin pressure on existing business due to lower reinvestment yields;
· increased competition in our primary markets, including aggressive pricing of annuities by private equity-backed annuity writers, increased competition and consolidation of employer groups in the group retirement planning market, and increased competition for auto and homeowners’ insurance in Japan;
· increasingly complex new and proposed regulatory requirements have created uncertainty that is affecting industry growth; and
· investments to upgrade our technology and underwriting processes challenge our management of general operating expenses.
Below is a discussion of the industry and economic factors impacting our specific modules:
Increasing life expectancy and reduced expectations for traditional retirement income from defined benefit programs and fixed income securities are leading Americans to seek additional financial security as they approach retirement. The strong demand for individual variable and fixed index annuities with guaranteed income features has attracted increased competition in thisproduct space. In response to the continued low interest rate environment, which has added pressure to profit margins, we have developed guaranteed income benefits for both variable and fixed index annuities with margins that are less sensitive to the level of interest rates.
Changes in the interest rate environment have a significant impact on sales, surrender rates, investment returns, guaranteed income features, and spreads in the annuity industry. See AIG’s Outlook – Industry and Economic Factors – Impact of Changes in the Interest Rate Environment for additional discussion of the impact of market interest rate movement on our Individual Retirement business.
Individual Retirement provides products and services to certain employee benefit plans that are subject to the requirements of the DOL Fiduciary Rule. For additional information on the DOL Fiduciary Rule, see Executive Summary – AIG’s Outlook – Industry and Economic Factors – Department of Labor Fiduciary Rule.
Group Retirement competes in the defined contribution market under the VALIC brand. VALIC is a leading retirement plan provider in the U.S. for K-12 schools and school districts, higher education, healthcare, government and other not-for-profit institutions. The defined contribution market is a highly efficient and competitive market that requires support for both plan sponsors and individual participants. To meet this challenge, VALIC is investing in a client-focused technology platform to support improved compliance andself-service functionality. VALIC’s service model pairs self-service tools with its career financial advisors who provide individual plan participants with enrollment support and comprehensive financial planning services.
Changes in the interest rate environment have a significant impact on sales, surrender rates, investment returns, guaranteed income features, and spreads in the annuity industry. See AIG’s Outlook –Industry and Economic Factors – Impact of Changes in the Interest Rate Environment for additional discussion of the impact of market interest rate movement on our Group Retirement business.
Group Retirement provides products and services to certain employee benefit plans that are subject to the requirements of the DOL Fiduciary Rule. For additional information on the DOL Fiduciary Rule, see Executive Summary – AIG’s Outlook – Industry and Economic Factors – Department of Labor Fiduciary Rule.
Consumers have a significant need for life insurance, whether it is used for income replacement for their surviving family, estate planning or wealth transfer. Additionally, consumers use life insurance to provide living benefits in case of chronic, critical or terminal illnesses, as well as to supplement retirement income.
In response to consumer needs and a sustained low interest rate environment, our Life Insurance product portfolio has been evolving. Our emphasis is shifting away from products with long-duration interest rate guarantees to a stronger focus on indexed universal life products. See AIG’s Outlook –Industry and Economic Factors – Impact of Changes in the Interest Rate Environment for additional discussion of the impact of market interest rate movement on our Life Insurance business.
As life insurance ownership remains at historical lows in the United States, efforts to expand the reach and increase the affordability of life insurance are critical. The industry is investing in consumer-centric efforts to reduce traditional barriers to securing life protection by simplifying the sales and service experience. Digitally-enabled processes and tools provide a fast, friendly and simple path to life insurance protection.
The need forfull life cycle products and coverage, increases inpersonal wealth accumulation, and awareness of insurance protection and risk management continue to support the growth ofthe Personal Insurance industry. Personal Insurance focuses on group andcorporate clients, together with individual customers within national markets. We expect the demandfor multinational cross-border coverage and services to increase due to the internationalization of clients and customers. We believe our global presence providesPersonal Insurance a distinct competitive advantage.
In Japan, the competition for auto insurance has intensified, in part driven by a decline in new car sales and the existence of fewer but larger insurers. In addition, the overall market size in homeowners insurancecontracted after the durationrestriction on long-term fire insurance became effective in October 2015. In the U.S., we compete in the high net worth market and will continue to expand our innovative products and services to distribution partners and clients. Outside of Japan and the U.S., Personal Insurance continues to invest selectively in markets that we believe have higher potential for sustainable profitability.
CONSUMER INSURANCE RESULTS
3,141
3,169
1,612
507
Total operating revenue
2,174
2,098
820
717
General operating and other expenses*
1,224
1,552
4,894
5,187
* Includes general operating expenses, non-deferrable commissions, other acquisition expenses, advisory fee expenses and other expenses.
Our insurance companies generate significant revenues from investment activities. As a result, the modules in Consumer Insurance are subject to variances in net investment income on the asset portfolios that support insurance liabilities and surplus. See Investments for additional information on our investment strategy, asset-liability management process and invested asset composition.
Individual Retirement Results
The following table presents individual retirement results:
185
1,007
839
Advisory fee and other income
153
440
(65)
415
443
Non deferrable insurance commissions
166
The market environment reflected continued uncertainty about the DOL Fiduciary Rule and interest rates which, while higher than a year ago, remained low relative to historical levels. As a result, deposits in first quarter 2017 were lower than the same period in the prior year in all product lines. Net investment income results included higher returns from alternative investments due to the improved equity market environment and higher gains on securities for which the fair value option was elected.
Individual Retirement Pre-Tax Operating Income
• higher net investment income reflecting higher returns on alternative investments from improved equity market performance and higher gains on securities for which the fair value option was elected;
• improved equity market performance also contributing to a decrease in policyholder benefit expense and DAC amortization; and
• higher policy fee income due to growth in annuity account values from improvement in the equity markets and positive net flows over the past twelve months.
The increase in Pre-tax operating income was partially offset by the sale of AIG Advisor Group in May 2016, which drove the decreases in advisory fee income, advisory expenses and general operating expenses, and resulted in a net $13 million decrease in pre-tax operating income.
Individual Retirement GAAP Premiums, Premiums and Deposits, Surrenders and Net Flows
For Individual Retirement, premiums primarily represent amounts received on life-contingent payout annuities. Premiums decreased in the first quarter of 2017 compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily due to lower sales of immediate annuities.
Premiums and deposits is a non‑GAAP financial measure that includes, in addition to direct and assumed premiums, deposits received on investment-type annuity contracts and mutual funds under administration.
Net flows for annuity products in Individual Retirement represent premiums and deposits less death, surrender and other withdrawal benefits. Net flows for mutual funds represent deposits less withdrawals.
The following table presents a reconciliation of Individual Retirement premiums and deposits to GAAP premiums:
Deposits
4,963
Premiums and deposits
3,382
5,010
Surrender Rates
The following table presents surrenders as a percentage of average reserves:
Surrenders as a percentage of average reserves
7.2
Variable and Index Annuities
6.0
4.8
The following table presents reserves for Fixed Annuities and Variable and Index Annuities by surrender charge category:
Variable
Fixed
and Index
Annuities
No surrender charge
34,146
16,097
34,674
15,338
Greater than 0% - 2%
1,251
4,810
857
4,558
Greater than 2% - 4%
2,013
6,414
2,221
5,741
Greater than 4%
12,698
35,406
12,599
34,966
Non-surrenderable
1,509
1,606
380
Total reserves
51,617
63,113
51,957
60,983
Individual Retirement annuities are typically subject to a four- to seven-year surrender charge period, depending on the product. For Variable and Index Annuities, the proportion of reserves subject to surrender charges at March 31, 2017 has decreased compared to December 31, 2016 due to normal aging of the business and slower sales, which were due in part to uncertainty around the implementation of the DOL Fiduciary Rule. The increase in reserves with no surrender charge contributed to the increase in the surrender rate in the first quarter of 2017 compared to the same period in the prior year.
A discussionof the significant variances in premiums and deposits and net flows for each product line follows:
Individual Retirement Premiums and Deposits (P&D) and Net Flows
• Fixed Annuities premiums and deposits were lower than the prior year due to stronger sales in the first quarter of 2016, when higher equity market volatility made fixed annuities attractive to customers seeking less volatile returns.
• Variable and Index Annuities premiums and deposits and net flows declined, reflecting lower sales of index annuities, along with a continued decrease in variable annuity industry sales due to uncertainty around the implementation of the DOL Fiduciary Rule. Lower sales combined with higher surrenders compared to the prior year period resulted in negative net flows for the variable annuity product line.
• Retail Mutual Fundshad negative net flows in the first quarter of 2017 compared to positive net flows in the first quarter of 2016, reflecting lower deposits due to overall industry trends in active management funds, uncertainty surrounding the DOL Fiduciary Rule and recent performance in the Focused Dividend Strategy Portfolio.
Group Retirement Results
91
279
Group Retirement had slightly higher premiums and growth of 10 percent in premiums and deposits in the first quarter of 2017 compared to the same period in the prior year, but higher surrenders resulted in negative net flows for the quarter, reflecting continued pressure from the consolidation of healthcare providers and other employers in our target markets. Low base net investment yields continued to pressure investment spreads, partially mitigated by crediting rate management. Net investment income results reflected improved returns from alternative investments.
Group Retirement Pre-Tax Operating Income
• higher net investment income reflecting higher returns on alternative investments, primarily from improved equity market performance and higher gains on securities for which the fair value option was elected; and
• higher policy fee income due to growth in account values from improvement in the equity markets.
Partially offsetting these increases were:
• lower base net investment spread primarily due to lower prepayments on commercial mortgage loans compared to the prior year, partially mitigated by effective crediting rate management;
• higher general operating expense due to higher spending in the first quarter of 2017 compared to the prior year to prepare for the implementation of the DOL Fiduciary Rule.
Group Retirement GAAP Premiums, Premiums and Deposits, Surrenders and Net Flows
For Group Retirement, premiums primarily represent amounts received on life-contingent payout annuities. Premiums in the first quarter of 2017, which primarily represent immediate annuities, increased slightly compared to the same period in the prior year.
Net flows for annuity products included in Group Retirement represent premiums and deposits less death, surrender and other withdrawal benefits. Net flows for mutual funds represent deposits less withdrawals.
The following table presents a reconciliation of Group Retirement premiums and deposits to GAAP premiums:
2,031
1,849
1,856
The following table presents Group Retirement surrenders as a percentage of average reserves and mutual funds under administration:
Surrenders as a percentage of average reserves and mutual funds
10.2
7.9
The following table presents reserves for Group Retirement annuities by surrender charge category:
(a)
No surrender charge(b)
65,793
64,160
906
1,395
5,274
5,434
411
73,770
72,312
(a) Excludes mutual fund assets under administration of $17.2 billion and $16.3 billion at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.
(b) Group Retirement amounts in this category include reserves of approximately $6.3 billion, at both March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, that are subject to 20 percent annual withdrawal limitations.
Group Retirement annuities are typically subject to a five- to seven-year surrender charge period, depending on the product. The increase in the amount and proportion of Group Retirement annuity reserves that have no surrender charge at March 31, 2017 compared to December 31, 2016 was primarily due to normal aging of this book of business, as well as lower than expected surrenders of older contracts with higher minimum interest rates on fixed account balances that have continued to be attractive to the contract holders in the low interest rate environment.
A discussion of the significant variances in premiums and deposits and net flows follows:
Group Retirement Premiums and Deposits and Net Flows
Premiums and deposits increased 10 percent, primarily driven by higher deposits from group acquisitions. The growth in sales was more than offset by surrenders, including group plan surrenders of approximately $350 million, which were within expectations but higher than in the prior year, resulting in net flows that were negative in the first quarter of 2017.
Life Insurance Results
359
360
345
593
95
Life Insurance new individual life sales in the first quarter of 2017 reflected higher sales of universal life products compared to the prior-year period. Life Insurance is focused on selling profitable new products through strategic channels to enhance future returns. Domestic general operating expenses decreased in the first quarter of 2017 compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily due to the strategic decision to refocus the group benefits business and other reductions in staffing.
Life Insurance Pre-Tax Operating Income
• higher net investment income reflecting higher returns on alternative investments primarily from improved equity market performance;
• higher policy fee income primarily from growth in universal life; and
• lower domestic general operating expenses primarily due to reductions in staffing.
Life Insurance GAAP Premiums and Premiums and Deposits
Premiums for Life Insurance represent amounts received on traditional life insurance policies, primarily term life, and group benefit policies. Premiums increased 8.5 percent in the first quarter of 2017 compared to the same period in the prior year, excluding the effect of foreign exchange, primarily due to growth in international operations.
Premiums and deposits for Life Insurance is a non-GAAP financial measure that includes direct and assumed premiums as well as deposits received on universal life insurance.
The following table presents a reconciliation of Life Insurance premiums and deposits to GAAP premiums:
158
A discussion of the significant variances in premiums and deposits follows:
Life Insurance Premiums and Deposits
Premiums and deposits grew by 8.2 percent, excluding the effect of foreign exchange, principally driven by growth in international life and health sales from AIG Life Limited and assumed premiums related to business distributed by Laya Healthcare.
Personal Insurance Results
2,668
2,809
2,720
2,756
1,452
481
475
220
236
701
711
Underwriting income
Loss ratio
56.0
52.7
3.3
25.8
14.8
16.1
40.6
41.9
Combined ratio
96.6
94.6
(1.1)
55.0
53.4
95.6
95.3
The following table presents Personal Insurance net premiums written, showing change on both reported and constant dollar basis:
The following tables present Personal Insurance accident year catastrophes and severe losses by geography(a) and the number of events:
Flooding
Wildfire
Earthquakes
Personal Insurance operating results increased slightly in the first quarter of 2017 compared to the same period in 2016. Personal insurance continued its effective execution of strategic and portfolio actions to reduce total expenses, while implementing underwriting actions and maintaining pricing discipline. Although market competition in the personal insurance industry has intensified, the accident year loss ratio, as adjusted, continued to reflect the underwriting quality, portfolio diversity, and low volatility of short-tailed risk in our Personal Insurance book.
Personal Insurance Pre-Tax Operating Income
• higher net investment income due to higher returns on alternative investments in hedge funds; and
• strategic actions to reduce expenses and refocus direct marketing activities.
Mostly offset by:
• slightly lower earned premium base; and
• higher accident losses, including lower net favorable prior year loss reserve development and one severe loss.
Personal Insurance Net Premiums Written
Net premiums written decreased both on a reported basis and after excluding the effect of foreign exchange. The decrease in net premiums written on a constant dollar basis reflected the following:
• growth in warranty service programs and AIG Private Client Group business; more than offset by:
• decreased production in Accident and Health primarily due to lower sales as a result of refocusing our direct marketing activities coupled with increased reinsurance purchases on certain blocks of business to manage aggregate exposure; and
• increased ceded premiums due to the lower attachment point on our corporate catastrophe reinsurance program.
Personal Insurance Combined Ratios
The increase in combined ratio reflected the combination of a higher loss ratio and lower expense ratio.
The increase in loss ratio was driven by:
• non-reoccurrence of net favorable prior year loss reserve development, partially offset by lower catastrophe losses;
• one severe loss; and
• a slightly lower attritional loss ratio in the first quarter of 2016 coupled with changes in product and geographic mix.
The decrease in expense ratio reflected continued strategic actions to reduce operating expenses.
The following table presents Other Operations results:
Pre-tax operating loss by activities:
United Guaranty
Institutional Markets
Fuji Life
Parent and Other:
Corporate General operating expenses
(191)
(243)
Other income, net
Total Parent and Other
(324)
(407)
Pre-tax operating loss before eliminations
Consolidation, eliminations and other adjustments
Pre-tax operating loss
(198)
(219)
Pre-tax operating loss before eliminations increased slightly, primarily driven by the sale of United Guaranty during the fourth quarter of 2016, partially offset by lower losses in Parent and Other.
Institutional Markets reported higher pre-tax operating income in the three-month period ended March 31, 2017 compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily due to higher net investment income on alternative investments.
Fuji Life pre-tax operating results increased primarily as a result of increases in underwriting income as a result of new products launched during 2016.
Parent and Other pre-tax operating loss decreased as a result of higher income from investments and lower general operating expenses, consistent with our strategy to reduce expenses.
Legacy Insurance Lines represent exited or discontinued product lines, policy forms or distribution channels.
Legacy Property and Casualty Run-Off Insurance Lines — include excess workers’ compensation, asbestos and environmental exposures.
Legacy Life Insurance Run-Off Lines — include whole life, long term care and exited Accident & Health product lines. Also includes certain structured settlement, terminal funding and single premium immediate annuities written prior to April 2012.
Legacy Investments —include investment classes that we have placed into run-off (life settlements, Legacy Global Real Estate and the Direct Investment book) and equity-like securities with high yield, high-risk characteristics.
For Legacy Insurance Lines, securing the interests of our policyholders and insureds is paramount. We have considered and continue to evaluate the following strategies for these lines:
• Third party and affiliated reinsurance and retrocessions to improve capital efficiency
• Commutations of assumed reinsurance and direct policy buy-backs
• Enhance insured policyholder options and claims resolution strategies
• Enhanced asset liability management and expense management
For Legacy Investments, our business strategy is to maximize liquidity to AIG Parent and minimize book value impairments while sourcing for our insurance companies attractive assets for their portfolios. Where the asset is under AIG’s sole control, we expect to achieve this through a combination of unaffiliated and affiliated sales and securitizations. Where the asset is not under AIG’s sole control, AIG has fewer options as we may, for example, have fiduciary duty obligations to joint venture partners (such as in our Legacy Global Real Estate book).
LEGACY PORTFOLIO RESULTS
The following table presents Legacy Portfolio results:
730
649
Other income (loss)
Policyholder benefits and losses and loss adjustment
expenses incurred
559
Total benefits and expenses
742
883
Pre-tax operating income (loss)
Pre-tax operating income (loss) by type:
Property and Casualty Run-Off Insurance Lines
87
Life Insurance Run-Off Lines
Legacy Investments
165
(269)
In the first quarter of 2017, the Legacy Investment portfolio executed on several transactions with external parties for total consideration of approximately $468 million, which included the sale on March 31, 2017 of a portion of our life settlements portfolio with a face value (death benefits) of approximately $1.4 billion, resulting in a loss on the sale of $89 million. The majority of the consideration received was used to pay down intercompany loans and notes with affiliated insurance companies. In addition, the Legacy Investment portfolio returned approximately $191 million of cash proceeds to AIG Parent in the first quarter of 2017 from the sale of an AIG sponsored fund that occurred in the fourth quarter of 2016.
Legacy Portfolio Pre-Tax Operating Income (Loss)
Pre-tax operating income increased due to:
• higher Legacy Life earnings due to improved returns on alternative investments as a result of improved equity market conditions;
• increased Legacy Property and Casualty pre-tax operating income due to lower current accident year losses; and
• increased Legacy Investment income in 2017 compared to losses in 2016 for portfolios on which the fair value option was elected.
Our investment strategies are tailored to the specific business needs of each operating unit. The investment objectives are driven by the respective business modules and AIG Parent. The primary objectives are generation of investment income, preservation of capital, liquidity management and growth of surplus to support the insurance products. The majority of assets backing our insurance liabilities consist of fixed maturity securities.
• Less credit market volatility in the first quarter of 2017 compared to the fourth quarter of 2016, with a marginal decrease in interest rates and narrowing of credit spreads resulted in a net unrealized gain in our investment portfolio. Net unrealized gains in our available for sale portfolio increased to approximately $10.6 billion as of March 31, 2017 from approximately $9.7 billion as of December 31, 2016.
• We continued to make investments in structured securities and other fixed maturity securities and increased lending activities in mortgage loans with favorable risk versus return characteristics to improve yields and increase net investment income.
• During the first quarter of 2017, we funded the adverse development reinsurance agreement entered into with NICO. The approximate $10.2 billion funding commitment was the primary reason for the decrease in the invested asset portfolio in the quarter.
• During the first quarter of 2017, we reduced our hedge fund portfolio by approximately $564 million as a result of redemptions consistent with our planned reduction of exposure. Our hedge fund portfolio experienced above average returns in the first quarter of 2017 due to higher equity market performance.
• Blended investment yields on new investments were lower than blended rates on investments that were sold, matured or called.
• Other-than-temporary impairments decreased due to lower impairments in our structured securities and corporate bond portfolios.
• The U.S. election and Brexit vote created increased volatility in credit markets and exchange rates as well as within the equity markets in 2016, which may continue for some time.
Investment strategies are based on considerations that include the local and general market conditions, liability duration and cash flow characteristics, rating agency and regulatory capital considerations, legal investment limitations, tax optimization and diversification.
Some of our key investment strategies are as follows:
• Fixed maturity securities held by the U.S. insurance companies included in Property Casualty Insurance Companies consist of a mix of instruments that meet our current risk-return, tax, liquidity, credit quality and diversification objectives.
• Outside of the U.S., fixed maturity securities held by Property Casualty Insurance Companies consist primarily of high-grade securities generally denominated in the currencies of the countries in which we operate.
• While more of a focus is placed on asset-liability management in Life Insurance Companies, our fundamental strategy across all of our investment portfolios is to optimize the duration characteristics of the assets within a target range based on comparable liability characteristics, to the extent practicable.
• AIG Parent, included in Other Operations, actively manages its assets and liabilities in terms of products, counterparties and duration. AIG Parent’s liquidity sources are held primarily in the form of cash, short-term investments and publicly traded, investment-grade rated fixed maturity securities. Based upon an assessment of its immediate and longer-term funding needs, AIG Parent purchases publicly traded, investment-grade rated fixed maturity securities that can be readily monetized through sales or repurchase agreements. These securities allow us to diversify sources of liquidity while reducing the cost of maintaining sufficient liquidity.
The following table presents the components of Net Investment Income:
Interest and dividends
3,063
3,243
Other investment income(b)
301
Total net investment income
(a) Includes income from hedge funds, private equity funds and affordable housing partnerships. Hedge funds for which we elected the fair value option are recorded as of the balance sheet date. Other hedge funds are generally reported on a one-month lag, while private equity funds are generally reported on a one-quarter lag.
(b) Primarily includes changes in fair value of certain fixed maturity securities where the fair value option has been elected and income on life settlements. For the quarters ended March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016, the investment income (loss) recorded on these securities was $127 million and $114 million, respectively, and on life settlements was $115 million and $126 million, respectively.
Net investment income in the first quarter of 2017 was higher than the same period in the prior year as higher income on alternative investments, primarily in our hedge fund portfolio, was partially offset by lower invested assets and blended investment yields on new investments that were lower than blended rates on investments that were sold, matured or called.
Attribution of Net Investment Income to Operating Modules
Net investment income is attributed to our businesses based on internal models consistent with the nature of the underlying businesses.
For Commercial Insurance — Liability and Financial Lines, Property and Special Risks and Consumer Insurance — Personal Insurance and Legacy Property Casualty Insurance Run-Off Lines, we estimate investable funds based primarily on loss reserves and unearned premiums. The allocation of net investment income of the Property Casualty Insurance Companies to modules is calculated based on these estimated investable funds, consistent with the approximate duration of the liabilities and the required economic capital allocation for each module.
For Consumer Insurance — Individual Retirement, Group Retirement, and Life Insurance, Other Operations — Institutional Markets and Legacy Life Insurance Run-Off Lines, net investment income is attributed based on invested assets from segregated product line portfolios held in our Life Insurance Companies. All invested assets of the Life Insurance Companies in excess of liabilities are allocated based on estimates of required economic capital allocation for each module.
Asset Liability Measurement
For the Property Casualty Insurance Companies, the duration of liabilities for long-tail casualty lines is greater than that of other lines. As a result, the investment strategy within the Property Casualty Insurance Companies focuses on growth of surplus and preservation of capital, subject to liability and other business considerations.
The Property Casualty Insurance Companies invest primarily in fixed maturity securities issued by corporations, municipalities and other governmental agencies and also invest in structured securities collateralized by, among other assets, residential and commercial real estate and commercial mortgage loans. While invested assets backing reserves of the Property Casualty Insurance Companies are primarily invested in conventional fixed maturity securities, we have continued to allocate a portion of our investment activity into asset classes that offer higher yields, particularly in the domestic operations. In addition, we continue to invest in both fixed rate and floating rate asset-backed investments for their risk-return attributes, as well as to manage our exposure to potential changes in interest rates. This asset diversification has maintained stable average yields while the overall credit ratings of our fixed maturity securities were largely unchanged. We expect to continue to pursue this investment strategy to meet the Property Casualty Insurance Companies’ liquidity, duration and credit quality objectives as well as current risk‑return and tax objectives.
In addition, the Property Casualty Insurance Companies seek to enhance returns through selective investments in a diversified portfolio of alternative investments. Although these alternative investments are subject to periodic earnings fluctuations, they have historically achieved yields in excess of the fixed maturity portfolio yields and have provided added diversification to the broader portfolio.
Fixed maturity securities of the Property Casualty Insurance Companies domestic operations, with an average duration of 4.2 years, are currently comprised primarily of tax-exempt securities, which provide attractive risk-adjusted after-tax returns, as well as taxable municipal bonds, government and agency bonds, and corporate bonds. The majority of these high quality investments are rated A or higher based on composite ratings.
Fixed maturity securities held in the Property Casualty Insurance Companies foreign operations are of high quality, primarily rated A or higher based on composite ratings, with an average duration of 3.6 years.
The investment strategy of the Life Insurance Companies is to maximize net investment income and portfolio value, subject to liquidity requirements, capital constraints, diversification requirements, asset‑liability management and available investment opportunities.
The Life Insurance Companies use asset‑liability management as a primary tool to monitor and manage risk in their businesses. The Life Insurance Companies' fundamental investment strategy is to maintain a diversified, high quality portfolio of fixed maturity securities that, to the extent practicable, complements the characteristics of liabilities, including duration, which is a measure of sensitivity to changes in interest rates. The investment portfolio of each product line is tailored to the specific characteristics of its insurance liabilities, and as a result, certain portfolios are shorter in duration and others are longer in duration. An extended low interest rate environment may result in a lengthening of liability durations from initial estimates, primarily due to lower lapses, which may require us to further extend the duration of the investment portfolio.
The Life Insurance Companies invest primarily in fixed maturity securities issued by corporations, municipalities and other governmental agencies; structured securities collateralized by, among other assets, residential and commercial real estate; and commercial mortgage loans.
In addition, the Life Insurance Companies seek to enhance returns through investments in a diversified portfolio of alternative investments. Although these alternative investments are subject to periodic earnings fluctuations, they have historically achieved yields in excess of the fixed maturity portfolio yields. While a diversified portfolio of alternative investments remains a fundamental component of the investment strategy of the Life Insurance Companies, we intend to reduce the overall size of the hedge fund portfolio, in light of changing market conditions and perceived market opportunities, and to continue reducing the size of the private equity portfolio.
Fixed maturity securities of the Life Insurance Companies domestic operations, with an average duration of 6.9 years, are comprised primarily of taxable corporate bonds, as well as taxable municipal and government bonds, and agency and non‑agency structured securities. The majority of these investments are held in the available for sale portfolio and are rated investment grade based on its composite ratings.
Fixed maturity securities held in the Life Insurance Companies foreign operations are of high quality, primarily rated A or higher based on composite ratings, with an average duration of 21.0 years.
NAIC Designations of Fixed Maturity Securities
The Securities Valuation Office (SVO) of the National Association of Insurance Companies (NAIC) evaluates the investments of U.S. insurers for statutory reporting purposes and assigns fixed maturity securities to one of six categories called ‘NAIC Designations.’ In general, NAIC Designations of ‘1’ highest quality, or ‘2’ high quality, include fixed maturity securities considered investment grade, while NAIC Designations of ‘3’ through ‘6’ generally include fixed maturity securities referred to as below investment grade. The NAIC has adopted revised rating methodologies for certain structured securities, including non-agency RMBS and CMBS, which are intended to enable a more precise assessment of the value of such structured securities and increase the accuracy in assessing expected losses to better determine the appropriate capital requirement for such structured securities. These methodologies result in an improved NAIC Designation for such securities compared to the rating typically assigned by the three major rating agencies. The following tables summarize the ratings distribution of U.S. Insurance Companies fixed maturity security portfolio by NAIC Designation, and the distribution by composite AIG credit rating, which is generally based on ratings of the three major rating agencies. See Investments – Credit Ratings herein for a full description of the composite AIG credit ratings.
The following table presents the fixed maturity security portfolio of U.S. Insurance Companies categorized by NAIC Designation, at fair value:
Below
NAIC Designation
Grade
Other fixed maturity securities
73,149
66,433
139,582
6,489
3,985
1,576
12,211
151,793
62,582
2,864
65,446
2,487
3,107
68,553
Total*
135,731
69,297
205,028
6,850
4,103
1,717
15,318
220,346
* Excludes $24.0 billion of fixed maturity securities for which no NAIC Designation is available because they are held in legal entities within U.S. Insurance Companies that do not require a statutory filing.
The following table presents the fixed maturity security portfolio of U.S. Insurance Companies categorized by composite AIG credit rating, at fair value:
CCC and
Composite AIG Credit Rating
AAA/AA/A
BBB
BB
B
Lower
74,355
65,828
140,183
5,883
4,178
1,549
11,610
40,603
4,911
45,514
20,929
23,039
114,958
70,739
185,697
7,148
5,023
22,478
34,649
At March 31, 2017, approximately 92 percent of our fixed maturity securities were held by our domestic entities. Approximately 17 percent of these securities were rated AAA by one or more of the principal rating agencies, and approximately 17 percent were rated below investment grade or not rated. Our investment decision process relies primarily on internally generated fundamental analysis and internal risk ratings. Third-party rating services’ ratings and opinions provide one source of independent perspective for consideration in the internal analysis.
Moody’s Investors’ Service Inc. (Moody’s), Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC, a subsidiary of S&P Global Inc. (S&P), or similar foreign rating services rate a significant portion of our foreign entities’ fixed maturity securities portfolio. Rating services are not available for some foreign-issued securities. Our Credit Risk Management department closely reviews the credit quality of the foreign portfolio’s non-rated fixed maturity securities. At March 31, 2017, approximately 24 percent of such investments were either rated AAA or, on the basis of our internal analysis, were equivalent from a credit standpoint to securities rated AAA, and approximately 8 percent were below investment grade or not rated. Approximately 39 percent of the foreign entities’ fixed maturity securities portfolio is comprised of sovereign fixed maturity securities supporting policy liabilities in the country of issuance.
Composite AIG Credit Ratings
With respect to our fixed maturity securities, the credit ratings in the table below and in subsequent tables reflect: (a) a composite of the ratings of the three major rating agencies, or when agency ratings are not available, the rating assigned by the NAIC SVO (over 99 percent of total fixed maturity securities), or (b) our equivalent internal ratings when these investments have not been rated by any of the major rating agencies or the NAIC. The “Non-rated” category in those tables consists of fixed maturity securities that have not been rated by any of the major rating agencies, the NAIC or us.
See Enterprise Risk Management herein for a discussion of credit risks associated with Investments.
The following table presents the composite AIG credit ratings of our fixed maturity securities calculated on the basis of their fair value:
Rating:
Other fixed maturity
securities
AAA
11,642
11,791
2,798
2,807
14,440
14,598
AA
30,028
33,647
251
30,279
33,897
A
42,532
45,619
44,144
47,231
67,928
68,700
68,004
68,776
Below investment grade
12,587
12,832
12,604
12,849
Non-rated
985
890
165,702
173,479
4,754
4,762
170,456
178,241
Mortgage-backed, asset-
backed and collateralized
26,647
28,593
1,103
1,055
27,750
29,648
6,018
6,114
714
6,680
6,828
8,396
8,504
8,647
8,811
4,697
4,996
4,942
5,299
19,224
19,838
6,543
6,790
25,767
26,628
73,847
77,294
38,289
40,384
3,901
3,862
42,190
44,246
36,046
39,761
36,959
40,725
50,928
54,123
1,863
1,919
52,791
56,042
72,625
73,696
72,946
74,075
31,811
32,670
6,807
38,371
39,477
999
903
1,046
970
244,303
255,535
Available‑for‑Sale Investments
The following table presents the fair value of our available‑for‑sale securities:
Total bonds available for sale*
* At March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the fair value of bonds available for sale held by us that were below investment grade or not rated totaled $32.8 billion and $33.6 billion, respectively.
The following table presents the fair value of our aggregate credit exposures to non-U.S. governments for our fixed maturity securities:
Germany
1,910
1,168
1,874
2,140
United Kingdom
1,070
815
Canada
1,040
1,115
Mexico
592
637
France
514
667
Norway
431
456
Netherlands
Indonesia
366
Singapore
344
5,848
6,433
14,357
14,586
The following table presents the fair value of our aggregate European credit exposures by major sector for our fixed maturity securities:
Financial
Structured
Sovereign
Institution
Corporates
Products
Euro-Zone countries:
156
1,821
3,889
3,227
1,031
1,916
3,461
3,788
698
1,155
2,658
Ireland
654
1,186
Belgium
837
1,047
1,075
Spain
874
934
918
Italy
85
786
Luxembourg
424
430
Finland
Austria
Other - EuroZone
705
227
965
Total Euro-Zone
3,735
2,238
8,560
15,321
15,598
Remainder of Europe
2,937
7,659
3,501
15,167
15,293
Switzerland
1,217
2,360
Sweden
400
680
550
582
Russian Federation
Other - Remainder of Europe
285
Total - Remainder of Europe
1,843
4,688
9,174
19,206
19,380
5,578
6,926
17,734
4,289
34,527
34,978
Investments in Municipal Bonds
At March 31, 2017, the U.S. municipal bond portfolio was composed primarily of essential service revenue bonds and high-quality tax-backed bonds with over 93 percent of the portfolio rated A or higher.
The following table presents the fair values of our available for sale U.S. municipal bond portfolio by state and municipal bond type:
State
Local
Obligation
Revenue
Total Fair Value
State:
New York
3,594
4,170
California
625
451
2,161
3,237
3,471
Texas
899
1,132
2,251
3,287
Massachusetts
606
1,169
1,396
Illinois
663
867
1,171
Florida
793
1,016
Virginia
628
673
789
Washington
353
652
1,059
Georgia
267
590
747
Washington D.C.
671
Pennsylvania
Ohio
437
Arizona
363
All other states(a)
762
2,832
3,987
5,182
Total(b)(c)
3,274
13,730
(a) We did not have material credit exposure to the government of Puerto Rico.
(b) Excludes certain university and not-for-profit entities that issue their bonds in the corporate debt market. Includes industrial revenue bonds.
(c) Includes $1.5 billion of pre-refunded municipal bonds.
Investments in Corporate Debt Securities
The following table presents the industry categories of our available for sale corporate debt securities:
Industry Category
Financial institutions:
Money Center /Global Bank Groups
8,675
8,892
Regional banks — other
586
Life insurance
3,175
3,100
Securities firms and other finance companies
391
Insurance non-life
4,926
5,213
Regional banks — North America
6,736
6,844
Other financial institutions
8,725
8,435
Utilities
17,331
17,938
Communications
9,774
10,025
Consumer noncyclical
14,862
Capital goods
7,899
8,339
Energy
13,498
13,618
Consumer cyclical
8,606
6,274
6,582
17,971
18,252
Total *
* At both March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, approximately 91 percent of these investments were rated investment grade.
Our investments in the energy category, as a percentage of total investments in available-for-sale fixed maturities, were 5.9 percent and 5.6 percent at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. While the energy investments are primarily investment grade and are actively managed, the category continues to experience volatility that could adversely affect credit quality and fair value.
Investments in RMBS
The following table presents AIG’s RMBS available for sale securities by year of vintage:
Total RMBS
3,541
4,464
2015
2,429
2,667
2014
882
943
2013
1,837
1,842
2012 and prior*
26,476
27,458
Agency RMBS
2,685
3,651
2,189
2,404
1,758
1,749
2012 and prior
4,888
5,225
Total Agency
12,416
13,854
Alt-A RMBS
12,106
12,371
Total Alt-A
12,122
12,387
Subprime RMBS
2,948
2,905
Total Subprime
Prime non-agency
738
6,236
6,651
Total Prime non-agency
7,017
7,422
Total Other housing related
806
* Includes approximately $12.8 billion and $12.9 billion at March 31, 2017, and December 31, 2016, respectively, of certain RMBS that had experienced deterioration in credit quality since their origination. See Note 6 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion on Purchased Credit Impaired (PCI) Securities.
The following table presents our RMBS available for sale securities by credit rating:
14,753
16,241
1,080
808
Below investment grade(a)
18,297
18,702
Total RMBS(b)
12,412
13,850
253
11,705
11,981
334
2,377
2,287
1,931
1,972
209
202
3,954
4,169
(a) Includes certain RMBS that had experienced deterioration in credit quality since their origination. See Note 6 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion on PCI Securities.
(b) The weighted average expected life was six years at both March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016.
Our underwriting practices for investing in RMBS, other asset‑backed securities (ABS) and CDOs take into consideration the quality of the originator, the manager, the servicer, security credit ratings, underlying characteristics of the mortgages, borrower characteristics, and the level of credit enhancement in the transaction.
Investments in CMBS
The following table presents our CMBS available for sale securities:
CMBS (traditional)
11,197
11,782
Agency
1,737
640
The following table presents the fair value of our CMBS available for sale securities by rating agency designation and by vintage year:
Non-Rated
Year:
1,421
2,120
1,136
2,350
1,495
1,740
2,474
399
2,966
2,073
483
461
4,307
8,610
2,034
1,240
936
779
1,420
2,357
235
1,858
2,527
3,017
2,227
517
635
731
947
5,067
8,943
1,899
1,292
1,150
977
The following table presents our CMBS available for sale securities by geographic region:
Geographic region:
3,372
3,479
1,332
1,357
787
467
New Jersey
421
434
356
287
310
223
Maryland
All Other*
5,455
5,766
* Includes Non-U.S. locations.
The following table presents our CMBS available for sale securities by industry:
Industry:
Office
4,232
4,390
3,684
3,853
Multi-family*
3,004
3,083
Lodging
925
1,017
971
957
* Includes Agency-backed CMBS.
The fair value of CMBS holdings remained stable during the first quarter of 2017. The majority of our investments in CMBS are in tranches that contain substantial protection features through collateral subordination. The majority of CMBS holdings are traditional conduit transactions, broadly diversified across property types and geographical areas.
Investments in CDOs
The following table presents our CDO available for sale securities by collateral type:
Fair value at
Collateral Type:
Bank loans (CLO)
8,086
8,548
8,203
8,677
The following table presents our CDO available for sale securities by credit rating:
2,997
3,112
2,244
Commercial Mortgage Loans
At March 31, 2017, we had direct commercial mortgage loan exposure of $26.0 billion, of which 100 percent of the loans were current.
The following table presents the commercial mortgage loan exposure by location and class of loan based on amortized cost:
532
5,998
944
863
107
1,590
1,101
466
407
1,063
1,041
650
627
Connecticut
513
Other states
270
1,305
1,315
1,637
534
5,546
864
499
476
537
973
4,208
6,015
282
870
2,925
255
1,515
408
1,014
529
355
993
473
578
269
1,239
1,670
560
199
5,458
707
596
3,770
* Does not reflect allowance for credit losses.
See Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the 2016 Annual Report for additional discussion on commercial mortgage loans.
The following table presents impairments by investment type:
Other-than-temporary Impairments:
Fixed maturity securities, available for sale
Equity securities, available for sale
Private equity funds and hedge funds
Subtotal
Other impairments:
Real estate*
* Impairments in 2017 included $35 million related to assets reclassified to assets held for sale.
Other-Than-Temporary Impairments
To determine other-than-temporary impairments, we use fundamental credit analyses of individual securities without regard to rating agency ratings. Based on this analysis, we expect to receive cash flows sufficient to cover the amortized cost of all below investment grade securities for which credit impairments were not recognized.
The following tables present other-than-temporary impairment charges recorded in earnings on fixed maturity securities, equity securities, private equity funds and hedge funds.
Other-than-temporary impairment charges by investment type and impairment type:
Other Fixed
Equities/Other
Maturity
Invested Assets*
Impairment Type:
* Includes other-than-temporary impairment charges on private equity funds, hedge funds and direct private equity investments.
Other-than-temporary impairment charges by investment type and credit rating:
We recorded other-than-temporary impairment charges in the first quarters of 2017 and 2016 related to:
• issuer-specific credit events;
• securities that we intend to sell or for which it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell;
• declines due to foreign exchange rates;
• adverse changes in estimated cash flows on certain structured securities; and
• securities that experienced severe market valuation declines.
In addition, impairments are recorded on real estate and investments in life settlements.
In periods subsequent to the recognition of an other-than-temporary impairment charge for available for sale fixed maturity securities that is not foreign-exchange related, we generally prospectively accrete into earnings the difference between the new amortized cost and the expected undiscounted recoverable value over the remaining life of the security. The accretion that was recognized for these securities in earnings was $188 million and $239 million in the three-month periods ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. See Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the 2016 Annual Report for a discussion of our other-than-temporary impairment accounting policy.
The following table shows the aging of the pre-tax unrealized losses of fixed maturity and equity securities, the extent to which the fair value is less than amortized cost or cost, and the number of respective items in each category:
Less Than or Equal
Greater Than 20%
Greater Than 50%
to 20% of Cost(b)
to 50% of Cost(b)
of Cost(b)
Aging(a)
Cost(c)
Loss
Items(e)
Loss(d)
Investment grade
bonds
0-6 months
39,645
1,078
4,542
39,745
1,110
4,557
7-11 months
5,365
712
5,372
311
12 months or more
5,518
367
6,028
686
50,528
1,754
5,905
51,145
5,960
Below investment
grade bonds
2,900
1,249
2,906
657
218
5,425
756
5,732
397
792
8,981
2,222
9,295
2,275
Total bonds
42,545
1,137
5,791
42,651
1,172
5,822
6,021
328
929
6,029
330
10,943
796
11,760
1,478
Total(e)
59,509
2,145
8,127
895
271
8,235
0-11 months
(a) Represents the number of consecutive months that fair value has been less than cost by any amount.
(b) Represents the percentage by which fair value is less than cost at March 31, 2017.
(c) For bonds, represents amortized cost.
(d) The effect on Net income of unrealized losses after taxes will be mitigated upon realization because certain realized losses will result in current decreases in the amortization of certain DAC.
(e) Item count is by CUSIP by subsidiary.
Change in Unrealized Gains and Losses on Investments
The change in net unrealized gains and losses on investments in the first quarter of each of 2017 and 2016 was primarily attributable to increases in the fair value of fixed maturity securities. For the first quarter of 2017 and 2016, net unrealized gains related to fixed maturity and equity securities increased by $0.9 billion and $4.7 billion, respectively, due primarily to a decrease in rates and a narrowing of credit spreads.
See also Note 6, Investments to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of our investment portfolio.
Net realized capital losses in the first quarter of 2017 decreased compared to the same period in the prior year. Net realized capital losses in the first quarter of 2017 were primarily related to derivative and hedge accounting losses, and impairments, which were higher than the foreign exchange gains and the gains recognized on the sales of securities.
Derivative and hedge accounting losses were primarily a result of the fair value changes in derivative instruments used to economically hedge market risk from variable annuities with guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefits (GMWB), which were impacted by interest rates and equity market performance in the first quarter of 2017. See Part II, Item 7. MD&A – Enterprise Risk Management – Insurance Risks – Life Insurance Companies Key Insurance Risks – Variable Annuity Risk Management and Hedging Programs in the 2016 Annual Report for additional discussion of market risk management related to these product features and Insurance Reserves – Life and Annuity Reserves and DAC – Variable Annuity Guaranteed Benefits and Hedging Results in this MD&A for more information on the economic hedging target and the impact to pre-tax income of this program.
Net realized capital losses on investments in the first quarter of 2016 were primarily driven by losses on sales of fixed maturity securities in the energy sector, other than temporary impairments, and foreign exchange losses, partially offset by gains realized on the sale of Class B shares of Prudential Financial, Inc. Foreign exchange losses were primarily due to $483 million of remeasurement losses for a short term intercompany balance that was matched with available for sale securities in fixed maturity securities denominated in the same foreign currencies.
See also Note 6 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of our investment portfolio.
Liability for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses (Loss Reserves)
The following table presents the components of our gross and net loss reserves by segment and major lines of business:
Net liability for
Reinsurance
Gross liability
Net liability
unpaid losses
recoverable on
for unpaid
and loss
unpaid losses and
losses and
adjustment
loss adjustment
expenses
Commercial Insurance:
Liability and Financial Lines:
U.S. Workers' Compensation*
(net of discount)
11,103
2,984
14,087
10,486
2,879
13,365
U.S. Excess Casualty
8,496
9,653
8,749
9,864
U.S. Other Casualty
9,619
3,329
12,948
8,746
3,209
11,955
U.S. Financial Lines
4,005
5,245
6,102
1,195
7,297
Europe Casualty and Financial Lines
5,556
1,231
6,787
5,587
1,313
Other product lines
2,210
968
3,178
2,279
3,265
(10,381)
10,381
Unallocated loss adjustment expenses
2,260
2,512
Total Liability and Financial Lines
32,941
21,559
54,500
44,209
10,949
55,158
Property and Special Risks:
U.S. and Europe
5,447
7,037
5,913
1,596
7,509
1,289
1,801
1,139
1,675
(706)
706
326
Total Property and Special Risks
2,857
9,162
7,331
2,179
9,510
39,246
24,416
63,662
51,540
13,128
64,668
Consumer Personal Insurance:
U.S. Europe and Japan
3,722
4,077
3,454
3,831
678
856
744
928
112
Total Consumer Personal Insurance
5,054
4,400
565
4,965
Legacy Portfolio - Run-off Property
and Casualty Insurance Lines:
U.S. Long Tail Insurance lines
6,516
6,544
6,659
Other run-off product lines
(1,664)
1,664
(1,679)
1,679
Unallocated loss adjusted expenses
Total Legacy Portfolio - Run-off Property
and Casualty Insurance Lines
5,344
1,855
5,487
1,839
7,326
15,532
* Includes loss reserve discount of $1.9 billion and $3.6 billion for the three-month period ended March 31, 2017 and year ended December 31, 2016, respectively. See Note 10 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for discussion of loss reserve discount.
PRIOR YEAR DEVELOPMENT
The following table summarizes incurred (favorable) unfavorable prior year development net of reinsurance by segment and major lines of business:
Consumer Personal Insurance
Legacy Portfolio - Property and Casualty Run off Insurance Lines
Total prior year (favorable) unfavorable development
Premium adjustments on U.S. loss sensitive business
Total prior year development, net of premium adjustments*
* Consistent with our definition of PTOI, excludes the portion of favorable or unfavorable prior year reserve development for which we have ceded the risk under retroactive reinsurance agreements and related changes in amortization of the deferred gain.
Net Loss Development
In the first quarter of 2017, we recognized adverse prior year loss reserve development of $10 million. We increased our loss reserves by $102 million as a result of the recent decision made by the UK Ministry of Justice to reduce the discount rate applied to lump-sum bodily injury payouts, known as the Ogden rate, to (0.75) percent. Our carried reserves at December 31, 2016 were estimated using our assumption that the Ogden rate would decline to 1.0 percent. This discount rate change primarily impacted the Europe Casualty and Financial Lines. This prior year loss reserve increase was almost entirely offset by the recognition of the amortization of the deferred gain from the adverse development reinsurance agreement with NICO of $41 million and favorable development from Property and Special Risks of $35 million as a result of a reduction in catastrophe losses.
In the first quarter of 2016, we recognized favorable prior year loss reserve development of $66 million. This was driven by favorable development from Consumer Personal Insurance primarily in the Japan region.
The following tables summarize incurred (favorable) or unfavorable prior year development net of reinsurance, by accident year groupings:
2016-11
2010-06
05 & Prior
Legacy Portfolio - Property and Casualty Run-off Insurance Lines
2015-11
For certain categories of claims (e.g., construction defect claims and environmental claims) and for reinsurance recoverable, losses may sometimes be reclassified to an earlier or later accident year as more information about the date of occurrence becomes available to us. These reclassifications are shown as development in the respective years in the tables above. This may affect the comparability of the data presented in our tables.
Significant Reinsurance Agreements
Effective January 1, 2016, we entered into a two-year reinsurance arrangement with the Swiss Reinsurance Company Ltd, under which we ceded a proportional share of our new and renewal U.S. Casualty portfolio in order to reduce the concentration of casualty business in our portfolio.
Our 2017 catastrophe reinsurance program includes coverage for natural catastrophes and some coverage for terrorism events. It consists of a large North American occurrence cover (without reinstatement) to protect against large North America losses and Japan cover to protect against losses in Japan. The attachment point for this reinsurance program is at $1.5 billion for the North American cover (down from $3.0 billion in 2016) and varies for the Japan cover.
On January 20, 2017, we entered into an adverse development reinsurance agreement (ADC) with NICO, a subsidiary of Berkshire, under which we transferred to NICO 80 percent of the reserve risk on substantially all of our U.S. Commercial long-tail exposures for accident years 2015 and prior. Under this agreement, we ceded to NICO 80 percent of the paid losses on subject business paid on or after January 1, 2016 in excess of $25 billion of net paid losses, up to an aggregate limit of $25 billion. At NICO’s 80 percent share, NICO’s limit of liability under the contract is $20 billion. We account for this transaction as retroactive reinsurance. We paid total consideration, including interest, of $10.2 billion. The consideration was placed into a collateral trust account as security for NICO’s claim payment obligations, and Berkshire has provided a parental guarantee to secure the obligations of NICO under the agreement.
The following table calculates the amount of the deferred gain recorded in the first quarter of 2017, on a nominal and net basis and showing the effect of discounting of loss reserves. The deferred gain will be amortized over the settlement period of the reinsured losses.
(in billions)
Nominal
Discount
Subject reserve, March 31, 2017
31.5
(2.1)
Subject losses paid inception to date
9.5
Total subject losses
41.0
38.9
Subject losses below the attachment point
25.0
24.9
Total subject losses above attachment point
16.0
(2.0)
14.0
Ceded reserves, March 31, 2017, at 80%
12.8
(1.6)
11.2
Consideration, including accrued interest through closing
Pre-tax gain at inception, deferred
2.6
The lines of business subject to this agreement have been the source of substantially all of the prior year adverse development charges over the past several years. The agreement resulted in lower capital charges for reserve risks at our U.S. insurance subsidiaries. Under U.S. GAAP, any potential future prior year development would be recognized immediately as losses are incurred; however, the related recoveries under the reinsurance agreement would be deferred and recognized over the expected recovery period. However, consistent with our definition of PTOI, excludes the portion of favorable or unfavorable prior year reserve development for which we have ceded the risk under retroactive reinsurance agreements and related changes in amortization of the deferred gain. In addition, amortization of the deferred gain is recognized in PTOI based on the original amortization schedule at the time we entered into the agreement.
See Part II, Item 7. MD&A – Enterprise Risk Management – Insurance Risks – Reinsurance Activities – Reinsurance Recoverable in our 2016 Annual Report for a summary of significant reinsurers.
LIFE AND ANNUITY reserves and dac
The following section provides discussion of life and annuity reserves and DAC.
Variable Annuity Guaranteed Benefits and Hedging Results
Our Individual Retirement and Group Retirement businesses offer variable annuity products with GMWB riders that provide guaranteed living benefit features. The liabilities for GMWB are accounted for as embedded derivatives measured at fair value. The fair value of the embedded derivatives may fluctuate significantly based on market interest rates, equity prices, credit spreads and market volatility.
In addition to risk-mitigating features in our variable annuity product design, we have an economic hedging program designed to manage market risk from GMWB, including exposures to changes in interest rates, equity prices, credit spreads and volatilities. The hedging program utilizes derivative instruments, including but not limited to equity options, futures contracts and interest rate swap and swaption contracts, as well as fixed maturity securities with a fair value election. See Part II, Item 7. MD&A – Enterprise Risk Management – Insurance Risks – Life Insurance Companies Key Insurance Risks – Variable Annuity Risk Management and Hedging Programs in our 2016 Annual Report for additional discussion of market risk management related to these product features.
Differences in Valuation of Embedded Derivatives and Economic Hedge Target
The variable annuity hedging program utilizes an economic hedge target, which represents an estimate of the underlying economic risks in our GMWB riders. The economic hedge target differs from the U.S. GAAP valuation of the GMWB embedded derivatives due to the following:
• The economic hedge target includes 100 percent of rider fees in present value calculations; the U.S. GAAP valuation reflects only those fees attributed to the embedded derivative such that the initial value at contract issue equals zero;
• The economic hedge target uses best estimate actuarial assumptions and excludes explicit risk margins used for U.S. GAAP valuation, such as margins for policyholder behavior, mortality, and volatility; and
• The economic hedge target excludes the non-performance or “own credit” risk adjustment (NPA) used in the U.S. GAAP valuation, which reflects a market participant’s view of our claims-paying ability by incorporating an additional spread (the NPA spread) to the swap curve used to discount projected benefit cash flows. See Note 5 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for more information on our valuation methodology for embedded derivatives within policyholder contract deposits. Because the discount rate includes the NPA spread and other explicit risk margins, the U.S. GAAP valuation is generally less sensitive to movements in interest rates and other market factors, and to changes from actuarial assumption updates, than the economic hedge target.
The market value of the hedge portfolio compared to the economic hedge target at any point in time may be different and is not expected to be fully offsetting. In addition to the derivatives held in conjunction with the variable annuity hedging program, the Life Insurance Companies have cash and invested assets available to cover future claims payable under these guarantees. The primary sources of difference between the change in the fair value of the hedging portfolio and the economic hedge target include:
• Basis risk due to the variance between expected and actual fund returns, which may be either positive or negative;
• Realized volatility versus implied volatility;
• Actual versus expected changes in the hedge target driven by assumptions not subject to hedging, particularly policyholder behavior; and
• Risk exposures that we have elected not to explicitly or fully hedge.
The following table presents a reconciliation between the fair value of the U.S. GAAP embedded derivatives and the value of our economic hedge target:
Reconciliation of embedded derivatives and economic hedge target:
Embedded derivative liability
Exclude non-performance risk adjustment (NPA)
(2,760)
(3,148)
Embedded derivative liability, excluding NPA
4,431
4,925
Adjustments for risk margins and differences in valuation
(2,080)
(2,251)
Economic hedge target liability
2,351
2,674
Impact on Pre-tax Income (Loss)
The impact on our pre-tax income (loss) of the variable annuity guaranteed living benefits and related hedging results includes changes in the fair value of the GMWB embedded derivatives, and changes in the fair value of related derivative hedging instruments, both of which are recorded in Other realized capital gains (losses). Realized capital gains (losses), as well as net investment income from changes in the fair value of fixed maturity securities used in the hedging program, are excluded from pre-tax operating income of Individual Retirement and Group Retirement.
The change in the fair value of the embedded derivatives and the change in the value of the hedging portfolio are not expected to be fully offsetting, primarily due to the differences in valuation between the economic hedge target, the U.S. GAAP embedded derivatives, and changes in the fair value of the hedging portfolio, as discussed above. When corporate credit spreads widen, the change in the NPA spread generally reduces the fair value of the embedded derivative liabilities, resulting in a gain, and when corporate credit spreads narrow or tighten, the change in the NPA spread generally increases the fair value of the embedded derivative liabilities, resulting in a loss. In addition to changes driven by credit market-related movements in the NPA spread, the NPA balance also reflects changes in business activity and in the net amount at risk from the underlying guaranteed living benefits.
The following table presents the net increase (decrease) to consolidated pre-tax income (loss) from changes in the fair value of the GMWB embedded derivatives and related hedges, excluding related DAC amortization:
Change in fair value of embedded derivatives, excluding NPA
(1,116)
Change in fair value of variable annuity hedging portfolio:
Interest rate derivative contracts
850
Equity derivative contracts
(409)
Change in fair value of variable annuity hedging portfolio
(581)
846
Change in fair value of embedded derivatives excluding NPA, net of hedging portfolio
(270)
Change in fair value of embedded derivatives due to NPA spread
Change in fair value of embedded derivatives due to change in NPA volume
Total change in NPA
(388)
358
Net impact on pre-tax income (loss)
(378)
The net impact on pre-tax income from the GMWB and related hedges in the first quarter of 2017 (excluding related DAC amortization) was primarily driven by losses on a U.S. GAAP basis from the impact of tightening credit spreads on the NPA spread, and the impact on the NPA (volume) of lower expected GMWB payments, driven by higher equity markets. In the first quarter of 2016, both components of the NPA adjustment had a positive impact on pre-tax income, primarily due to widening of spreads and declining interest rates. Fair value losses in the hedging portfolio are typically not fully offset by decreases in liabilities on a U.S. GAAP basis, due to the NPA and other risk margins used for U.S. GAAP valuation that cause the embedded derivatives to be less sensitive to changes in market rates than the hedge portfolio. On an economic basis, the changes in the fair value of the hedge portfolio were partially offset by the decrease in the economic hedge target, as discussed below.
Change in Economic Hedge Target
The decrease in the economic hedge target liability in the first quarter of 2017 was primarily due to positive equity markets and increases in market interest rates but was partially offset by lower credit spreads and equity volatility.
Change in Fair Value of the Hedging Portfolio
The changes in the fair value of the economic hedge target and, to a lesser extent, the embedded derivatives, were offset in part by the following changes in the fair value of the variable annuity hedging portfolio:
• Changes in the fair value of fixed maturity securities, primarily corporate bonds for which the fair value option has been elected, are used as a capital-efficient way to economically hedge interest rate and credit spread-related risk. The change in the fair value of the corporate bond hedging program in the first quarter of 2017 was a small gain, due to tightening of credit spreads, while the first quarter of 2016 included more significant gains, primarily due to decreases in market interest rates, partially offset by the impact of widening credit spreads. The change in the fair value of the hedging bonds, which is excluded from the pre-tax operating income of the Individual Retirement and Group Retirement segments, is reported in net investment income on the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss).
• Changes in the fair value of interest rate derivative contracts, which included swaps, swaptions and futures, resulted in net losses in the first quarter of 2017 from higher rates, compared to significant gains from interest rate declines in the first quarter of 2016.
• The change in the fair value of equity derivative contracts, which included futures and options, resulted in losses in the first quarter of 2017 and to a lesser extent in the first quarter of 2016, based on the relative change in equity market performance in the respective periods.
DAC
The following table summarizes the major components of the changes in DAC, including VOBA, within the life insurance companies, excluding DAC of Institutional Markets and Legacy Portfolio:
7,543
7,149
Acquisition costs deferred
238
Amortization expense:
Update of assumptions included in pre-tax operating income
Related to realized capital gains and losses
All other operating amortization
(227)
(242)
Increase (decrease) in DAC due to foreign exchange
Change related to unrealized depreciation (appreciation) of investments
Balance, end of period*
7,660
6,868
* DAC balance excluding the amount related to unrealized depreciation (appreciation) of investments was $8.4 billion and $9.1 billion at March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Estimated Gross Profits for Investment-Oriented Products
Policy acquisition costs and policy issuance costs that are incremental and directly related to the successful acquisition of new or renewal of existing contracts for investment-oriented products are deferred and amortized, with interest, in relation to the incidence of estimated gross profits to be realized over a period that approximates the estimated lives of the contracts. Estimated gross profits include net investment income and spreads, net realized capital gains and losses, fees, surrender charges, expenses, and mortality gains and losses. If the assumptions used for estimated gross profits change significantly, DAC and related reserves (which may include VOBA, SIA, guaranteed benefit reserves and unearned revenue reserve) are recalculated using the new assumptions, and any resulting adjustment is included in income. Updating such assumptions may result in acceleration of amortization in some products and deceleration of amortization in other products.
DAC and Reserves Related to Unrealized Appreciation of Investments
DAC for universal life and investment-type products (collectively, investment-oriented products) is adjusted at each balance sheet date to reflect the change in DAC as if securities available for sale had been sold at their stated aggregate fair value and the proceeds reinvested at current yields (shadow DAC). Shadow DAC generally moves in the opposite direction of the change in unrealized appreciation of the available for sale securities portfolio, reducing the reported DAC balance when market interest rates decline. Market interest rates decreased in the first quarter of 2017. As a result, the unrealized appreciation of fixed maturity securities held in the Life Insurance Companies that support the businesses at March 31, 2017 increased by $645 million compared to December 31, 2016, which resulted in a decrease in DAC to reflect the shadow DAC adjustment.
Reserves
The following table presents a rollforward of insurance reserves for Individual Retirement, Group Retirement and Life Insurance modules, including future policy benefits, policyholder contract deposits, other policy funds, and separate account liabilities, as well as Retail Mutual Funds and Group Retirement mutual fund assets under administration:
Balance at beginning of period, gross
129,321
121,474
Surrenders and withdrawals
(2,874)
(2,402)
Death and other contract benefits
(803)
(746)
(295)
1,862
Change in fair value of underlying assets and reserve accretion, net of
policy fees
1,338
Cost of funds*
Other reserve changes
(161)
Balance at end of period
131,624
125,221
Reserves related to unrealized appreciation of investments
Reinsurance ceded
(337)
(334)
Total Individual Retirement insurance reserves and mutual fund assets
131,287
124,887
88,622
84,145
(2,288)
(1,677)
(134)
(382)
2,444
90,958
84,695
Total Group Retirement insurance reserves and mutual fund assets
18,397
18,006
830
(158)
(129)
567
(204)
(267)
(273)
18,533
18,103
(1,074)
(1,114)
Total Life Insurance reserves
17,459
16,989
Total insurance reserves and mutual fund assets
236,340
223,625
6,278
7,696
(5,320)
(4,240)
(1,068)
(1,008)
(110)
2,448
4,617
1,301
775
(483)
241,115
228,019
(1,411)
(1,448)
239,704
226,571
* Excludes amortization of deferred sales inducements
Insurance reserves of Individual Retirement, Group Retirement and Life Insurance modules, and Retail Mutual Funds and Group Retirement mutual fund assets under administration, were comprised of the following balances:
7,318
7,380
120,095
119,644
Other policy funds
79,589
76,619
Total insurance reserves
207,370
204,021
Mutual fund assets
33,745
32,319
Liquidity refers to the ability to generate sufficient cash resources to meet our payment obligations. It is defined as cash and unencumbered assets that can be monetized in a short period of time at a reasonable cost. We manage our liquidity prudently through various risk committees, policies and procedures, and a stress testing and liquidity risk framework established by Enterprise Risk Management (ERM). Our liquidity risk framework is designed to manage liquidity at both AIG Parent and subsidiaries to meet our financial obligations for a minimum of six-months under a liquidity stress scenario. See Part II, Item 7. MD&A – Enterprise Risk Management — Risk Appetite, Limits, Identification, and Measurement in the 2016 Annual Report and Enterprise Risk Management — Liquidity Risk Management below for additional information.
Capital refers to the long-term financial resources available to support the operation of our businesses, fund business growth, and cover financial and operational needs that arise from adverse circumstances. Our primary source of ongoing capital generation is the profitability of our insurance subsidiaries. We must comply with numerous constraints on our minimum capital positions. These constraints drive the requirements for capital adequacy for both AIG and the individual businesses and are based on internally-defined risk tolerances, regulatory requirements, rating agency and creditor expectations and business needs. Actual capital levels are monitored on a regular basis, and using ERM’s stress testing methodology, we evaluate the capital impact of potential macroeconomic, financial and insurance stresses in relation to the relevant capital constraints of both AIG and our insurance subsidiaries.
We believe that we have sufficient liquidity and capital resources to satisfy future requirements and meet our obligations to policyholders, customers, creditors and debt-holders, including those arising from reasonably foreseeable contingencies or events.
Nevertheless, some circumstances may cause our cash or capital needs to exceed projected liquidity or readily deployable capital resources as was the case in 2008. Additional collateral calls, deterioration in investment portfolios or reserve strengthening affecting statutory surplus, higher surrenders of annuities and other policies, downgrades in credit ratings, or catastrophic losses may result in significant additional cash or capital needs and loss of sources of liquidity and capital. In addition, regulatory and other legal restrictions could limit our ability to transfer funds freely, either to or from our subsidiaries.
Depending on market conditions, regulatory and rating agency considerations and other factors, we may take various liability and capital management actions. Liability management actions may include, but are not limited to, repurchasing or redeeming outstanding debt, issuing new debt or engaging in debt exchange offers. Capital management actions may include, but are not limited to, paying dividends to our shareholders and share repurchases.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES ACTIVITY FOR the first quarter of 2017
Sources
AIG Parent Funding from Subsidiaries(a)
During the first quarter of 2017, AIG Parent received $177 million in dividends from subsidiaries. Of this amount, $150 million was dividends in the form of fixed maturity securities from our Property Casualty Insurance Companies, $25 million was cash dividends from our Life Insurance Companies and $2 million was cash dividends from AIG Federal Savings Bank.
AIG Parent also received $2.6 billion in tax sharing payments in the form of cash and fixed maturity securities from our insurance businesses in the first quarter of 2017, primarily from our Life Insurance Companies. The tax sharing payments may be subject to adjustment in future periods.
The dividends and tax sharing payments from our Life Insurance Companies resulted from and were funded, in part, by excess statutory capital released by a reinsurance agreement the Life Insurance Companies entered into effective December 31, 2016.
During the first quarter of 2017, we generated approximately $191 million in return of capital from Legacy Investments.
Uses
Debt Reduction
We made repurchases of and repayments on debt instruments of approximately $630 million during the first quarter of 2017. AIG Parent made interest payments on our debt instruments totaling $288 million during the first quarter of 2017.
Dividend
We paid a cash dividend of $0.32 per share on AIG Common Stock during the first quarter of 2017.
Repurchase of Common Stock(b)
We repurchased approximately 56 million shares of AIG Common Stock during the first quarter of 2017, for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $3.6 billion.
(a) In April 2017, we received approximately $387 million in additional dividends in the form of fixed maturity securities from our Life Insurance Companies. These dividends had been declared during the first quarter of 2017.
(b) Under Exchange Act Rule 10b5-1 repurchase plans, from April 1 to May 3, 2017, we repurchased approximately $1.1 billion of additional shares of AIG Common Stock. As of May 3, 2017, approximately $3.8 billion remained under our share repurchase authorization.
The following table presents selected data from AIG's Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows:
Sources:
Net cash provided by other investing activities
14,509
Changes in policyholder contract balances
320
1,634
Net cash provided by other financing activities
510
Total sources
14,980
5,877
Uses:
Change in restricted cash
Purchases of AIG Common Stock
Purchases of warrants
Net cash used in other financing activities
Total uses
(14,900)
(6,007)
Decrease in cash
The following table presents a summary of AIG’s Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows:
Summary:
Operating Cash Flow Activities
Insurance companies generally receive most premiums in advance of the payment of claims or policy benefits. The ability of insurance companies to generate positive cash flow is affected by the frequency and severity of losses under their insurance policies, policy retention rates and operating expenses.
Interest payments totaled $354 million in the first quarter of 2017 compared to $362 million in the same period in the prior year. Excluding interest payments, AIG had operating cash outflows of $10.0 billion in the first quarter of 2017 compared to operating cash outflows of $605 million in the first quarter of 2016. The operating cash outflow in the first quarter of 2017 was primarily due to payment for the adverse development reinsurance agreement entered into with NICO.
Investing Cash Flow Activities
Net cash provided by investing activities in the first quarter of 2017 was $14.5 billion compared to $385 million in the first quarter of 2016. The first quarter of 2017 included sales of certain investments to fund the adverse development reinsurance agreement entered into with NICO.
Financing Cash Flow Activities
Net cash used in financing activities in the first quarter of 2017 included:
• approximately $307 million in the aggregate to pay a dividend of $0.32 per share on AIG Common Stock;
• approximately $3.6 billion to repurchase approximately 56 million shares of AIG Common Stock; and
• approximately $602 million to repay long-term debt.
These items were partially offset by approximately $151 million in proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt.
Net cash used in financing activities in the first quarter of 2016 included:
• approximately $363 million to pay a dividend of $0.32 per share on AIG Common Stock;
• approximately $3.5 billion to repurchase approximately 63 million shares of AIG Common Stock;
• $173 million to repurchase 10 million warrants to purchase shares of AIG Common Stock; and
• approximately $958 million to repay long-term debt.
These items were partially offset by approximately $3.3 billion in proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt.
AIG Parent
As of March 31, 2017, AIG Parent had approximately $11.8 billion in liquidity sources. AIG Parent’s liquidity sources are primarily held in the form of cash, short-term investments and publicly traded, investment grade rated fixed maturity securities. Fixed maturity securities primarily include U.S. government and government sponsored entity securities, U.S. agency mortgage-backed securities, corporate and municipal bonds and certain other highly rated securities. AIG Parent actively manages its assets and liabilities in terms of products, counterparties and duration. Based upon an assessment of funding needs, the liquidity sources can be readily monetized through sales, repurchase agreements or contributed as admitted assets to regulated insurance companies. AIG Parent liquidity is monitored through the use of various internal liquidity risk measures. AIG Parent’s primary sources of liquidity are dividends, distributions, loans and other payments from subsidiaries and credit facilities. AIG Parent’s primary uses of liquidity are for debt service, capital and liability management, and operating expenses.
We believe that we have sufficient liquidity and capital resources to satisfy our reasonably foreseeable future requirements and meet our obligations to our creditors, debt-holders and insurance company subsidiaries. We expect to access the debt markets from time to time to meet funding requirements as needed.
We utilize our capital resources to support our businesses, with the majority of capital allocated to our insurance operations. Should we have or generate more capital than is needed to support our business strategies (including organic growth or acquisition opportunities) or mitigate risks inherent to our business, we may develop plans to distribute such capital to shareholders via dividends or share repurchase authorizations or deploy such capital towards liability management.
In the normal course, it is expected that a portion of the capital released by our insurance operations or through the utilization of AIG’s deferred tax assets may be available for distribution to shareholders. Additionally, it is expected that a portion of the capital associated with businesses or investments that do not directly support our insurance operations may be available for distribution to shareholders or deployment towards liability management upon its monetization.
In developing plans to distribute capital, AIG considers a number of factors, including, but not limited to: AIG’s business and strategic plans, expectations for capital generation and utilization, AIG’s funding capacity and capital resources in comparison to internal benchmarks, as well as rating agency expectations, regulatory standards and internal stress tests for capital.
The following table presents AIG Parent's liquidity sources:
As of
(In millions)
Cash and short-term investments(a)
3,950
Unencumbered fixed maturity securities(b)
4,991
4,470
Total AIG Parent liquidity
7,268
8,420
Available capacity under syndicated credit facility(c)
4,500
Total AIG Parent liquidity sources
11,768
12,920
(a) Cash and short-term investments include reverse repurchase agreements totaling $1.1 billion and $1.0 billion as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.
(b) Unencumbered securities consist of publicly traded, investment grade rated fixed maturity securities. Fixed maturity securities primarily include U.S. government and government sponsored entity securities, U.S. agency mortgage-backed securities, corporate and municipal bonds and certain other highly rated securities.
(c) For additional information relating to this syndicated credit facility, see Credit Facilities below.
Insurance Companies
We expect that our insurance companies will be able to continue to satisfy reasonably foreseeable future liquidity requirements and meet their obligations, including those arising from reasonably foreseeable contingencies or events, through cash from operations and, to the extent necessary, monetization of invested assets. Our insurance companies’ liquidity resources are primarily held in the form of cash, short-term investments and publicly traded, investment grade rated fixed maturity securities.
Each of our material insurance companies’ liquidity is monitored through various internal liquidity risk measures. The primary sources of liquidity are premiums, fees, reinsurance recoverables and investment income. The primary uses of liquidity are paid losses, reinsurance payments, benefit claims, surrenders, withdrawals, interest payments, dividends, expenses, investments and collateral requirements.
Our Property Casualty Insurance Companies may require additional funding to meet capital or liquidity needs under certain circumstances. Large catastrophes may require us to provide additional support to our affected operations. Downgrades in our credit ratings could put pressure on the insurer financial strength ratings of our subsidiaries, which could result in non‑renewals or cancellations by policyholders and adversely affect the subsidiary’s ability to meet its own obligations. Increases in market interest rates may adversely affect the financial strength ratings of our subsidiaries, as rating agency capital models may reduce the amount of available capital relative to required capital. Other potential events that could cause a liquidity strain include an economic collapse of a nation or region significant to our operations, nationalization, catastrophic terrorist acts, pandemics or other events causing economic or political upheaval.
On January 20, 2017, certain of our Property Casualty Insurance Companies entered into an adverse development reinsurance agreement with NICO under which they transferred to NICO 80 percent of reserve risk on substantially all of their U.S. Commercial long-tail exposures for accident years 2015 and prior. Under this agreement, these Property Casualty Insurance Companies ceded to NICO 80 percent of the paid losses on subject business paid on or after January 1, 2016 in excess of $25 billion of net paid losses, up to an aggregate limit of $25 billion. The total consideration paid, including interest, was $10.2 billion.
Management believes that because of the size and liquidity of our Life Insurance Companies’ investment portfolios, normal deviations from projected claim or surrender experience would not create significant liquidity risk. Furthermore, our Life Insurance Companies’ products contain certain features that mitigate surrender risk, including surrender charges. However, as we saw in 2008, in times of extreme capital markets disruption, liquidity needs could outpace resources. As part of their risk management framework, our Life Insurance Companies continue to evaluate and, where appropriate, pursue strategies and programs to improve their liquidity position and facilitate their ability to maintain a fully invested asset portfolio.
Certain of our U.S. insurance companies are members of the Federal Home Loan Banks (FHLBs) in their respective districts. Borrowings from the FHLBs are used to supplement liquidity or for other uses deemed appropriate by management. Our U.S. Property Casualty Insurance Companies had outstanding borrowings from the FHLBs in an aggregate amount of approximately $701 million and $733 million at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. The outstanding borrowings are being used primarily for interest rate risk management purposes in connection with certain reinsurance arrangements, and the balances are expected to decline as underlying premiums are collected. Our U.S. Life Insurance Companies had no outstanding borrowings in the form of cash advances from the FHLBs at March 31, 2017, and aggregate borrowings in the form of cash advances of approximately $2 million at December 31, 2016. In addition to borrowings in the form of cash advances outstanding, $553 million and $429 million were due to the FHLB of Dallas at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, under funding agreements issued by our Institutional Markets business, which were reported in Policyholder contract deposits.
Certain of our U.S. Life Insurance Companies have programs, which began in 2012, that lend securities from their investment portfolio to supplement liquidity or for other uses as deemed appropriate by management. Under these programs, these U.S. Life Insurance Companies lend securities to financial institutions and receive cash as collateral equal to 102 percent of the fair value of the loaned securities. Cash collateral received is invested in short-term investments. Additionally, the aggregate amount of securities that a Life Insurance Company is able to lend under its program at any time is limited to five percent of its general account statutory-basis admitted assets. Our U.S. Life Insurance Companies had $2.4 billion of securities subject to these agreements and $2.5 billion of liabilities to borrowers for collateral received at both March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016.
AIG generally manages capital between AIG Parent and our insurance companies through internal, Board-approved policies and limits, as well as management standards. In addition, AIG Parent has unconditional capital maintenance agreements (CMAs) in place with certain subsidiaries. Nevertheless, regulatory and other legal restrictions could limit our ability to transfer capital freely, either to or from our subsidiaries.
AIG Parent is party to a CMA with AGC Life Insurance Company. Among other things, the CMA provides that AIG Parent will maintain the total adjusted capital of AGC Life Insurance Company at or above a specified minimum percentage of its projected NAIC Company Action Level Risk-Based Capital (RBC). As of March 31, 2017, the specified minimum percentage under this CMA was 250 percent.
During 2016, we created a new Switzerland-domiciled international holding company, AIG International Holdings, GmbH (AIGIH), which is intended to be the ultimate holding company for all of our international entities. This international holding company structure is part of our ongoing efforts to simplify our organizational structure, and is expected to facilitate the optimization of our international capital strategy from both a regulatory and tax perspective. Through May 3, 2017, the following international operations have been transferred to AIGIH: Europe, Canada, Asia Pacific and Latin America/Caribbean.
In the first quarter of 2017, our Property Casualty Insurance Companies paid approximately $150 million in dividends in the form of fixed maturity securities to AIG Parent. The fixed maturity securities primarily included U.S. government and government-sponsored entity securities, U.S. agency mortgage-backed securities, corporate and municipal bonds and certain other highly rated securities.
In the first quarter of 2017, the Life Insurance Companies collectively declared a total of $1.3 billion of dividends and return of capital. Of this amount, $25 million was paid in the form of cash in the first quarter of 2017, $387 million was declared in the first quarter of 2017 and paid in April 2017 in the form of fixed maturity securities, and $890 million was retained at an intermediate life insurance holding company to fund tax sharing payments to AIG Parent related to the recapture of outstanding reserves as of December 31, 2016 under an affiliated reinsurance agreement, and cession by one of the Life Insurance Companies to an unaffiliated reinsurer, of certain term life and universal life businesses. The Life Insurance Companies made tax sharing payments to AIG Parent in the first quarter of 2017 totaling $2.6 billion in the form of cash and fixed maturity securities, primarily as a result of these reinsurance transactions. Fixed maturity securities used to fund dividends and tax sharing payments included U.S. government and government sponsored entity securities, U.S. agency mortgage-backed securities, corporate and municipal bonds and certain other highly rated securities.
We maintain a committed, revolving syndicated credit facility (the Facility) as a potential source of liquidity for general corporate purposes. The Facility provides for aggregate commitments by the bank syndicate to provide unsecured revolving loans and/or standby letters of credit of up to $4.5 billion without any limits on the type of borrowings and is scheduled to expire in November 2020.
As of March 31, 2017, a total of $4.5 billion remains available under the Facility. Our ability to borrow under the Facility is not contingent on our credit ratings. However, our ability to borrow under the Facility is conditioned on the satisfaction of certain legal, operating, administrative and financial covenants and other requirements contained in the Facility. These include covenants relating to our maintenance of a specified total consolidated net worth and total consolidated debt to total consolidated capitalization. Failure to satisfy these and other requirements contained in the Facility would restrict our access to the Facility and could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and liquidity. We expect to borrow under the Facility from time to time, and may use the proceeds for general corporate purposes.
The following table summarizes contractual obligations in total, and by remaining maturity:
Payments due by Period
Remainder
2018 -
2020 -
Payments
of 2017
2019
2021
2022
Thereafter
Insurance operations
Loss reserves
77,990
23,892
13,275
22,329
Insurance and investment contract liabilities
243,003
11,901
28,736
26,859
12,360
163,147
Borrowings
Interest payments on borrowings
Other long-term obligations
322,906
26,016
52,730
40,570
16,818
186,772
24,623
1,173
3,184
3,110
1,551
15,605
14,999
1,967
1,741
753
9,790
39,833
1,962
5,242
4,892
2,304
25,433
25,600
3,445
16,247
15,927
774
2,066
1,840
803
10,444
Other long-term obligations(a)
362,739
27,978
57,972
45,462
19,122
212,205
(a) Primarily includes contracts to purchase future services and other capital expenditures.
(b) Does not reflect unrecognized tax benefits of $4.5 billion, the timing of which is uncertain.
Loss reserves relate to our Property Casualty Insurance Companies and represent estimates of future loss and loss adjustment expense payments estimated based on historical loss development payment patterns. Due to the significance of the assumptions used, the payments by period presented above could be materially different from actual required payments. We believe that our Property Casualty Insurance Companies maintain adequate financial resources to meet the actual required payments under these obligations.
Insurance and Investment Contract Liabilities
Insurance and investment contract liabilities, including GIC liabilities, relate to our Life Insurance Companies. These liabilities include various investment-type products with contractually scheduled maturities, including periodic payments. These liabilities also include benefit and claim liabilities, of which a significant portion represents policies and contracts that do not have stated contractual maturity dates and may not result in any future payment obligations. For these policies and contracts (i) we are not currently making payments until the occurrence of an insurable event, such as death or disability, (ii) payments are conditional on survivorship or (iii) payment may occur due to a surrender or other non-scheduled event beyond our control.
We have made significant assumptions to determine the estimated undiscounted cash flows of these contractual policy benefits. These assumptions include mortality, morbidity, future lapse rates, expenses, investment returns and interest crediting rates, offset by expected future deposits and premiums on in-force policies. Due to the significance of the assumptions, the periodic amounts presented could be materially different from actual required payments. The amounts presented in this table are undiscounted and exceed the future policy benefits and policyholder contract deposits included in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
We believe that our Life Insurance Companies have adequate financial resources to meet the payments actually required under these obligations. These subsidiaries have substantial liquidity in the form of cash and short-term investments. In addition, our Life Insurance Companies maintain significant levels of investment grade rated fixed maturity securities, including substantial holdings in government and corporate bonds, and could seek to monetize those holdings in the event operating cash flows are insufficient. We expect liquidity needs related to GIC liabilities to be funded through cash flows generated from maturities and sales of invested assets.
Our borrowings exclude those incurred by consolidated investments and include hybrid financial instrument liabilities recorded at fair value. We expect to repay the long-term debt maturities and interest accrued on borrowings by AIG through maturing investments and dispositions of invested assets, future cash flows from operations, cash flows generated from invested assets, future debt issuance and other financing arrangements. Borrowings supported by assets of AIG include various notes and bonds payable as well as GIAs that are supported by cash and investments held by AIG Parent and certain non-insurance subsidiaries for the repayment of those obligations.
The following table summarizes Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Commercial Commitments in total, and by remaining maturity:
Amount of Commitment Expiring
Total Amounts
Committed
Guarantees:
Standby letters of credit
Guarantees of indebtedness
All other guarantees(a)
Commitments:
Investment commitments(b)
2,901
1,948
715
Commitments to extend credit
2,794
1,489
Letters of credit
5,956
3,658
1,641
Liquidity facilities(d)
74
All other guarantees
Commitments to extend credit(e)
Total(c)(f)
1,004
293
3,078
1,960
745
237
3,294
1,392
6,960
3,839
2,192
674
(a) Includes construction guarantees connected to affordable housing investments by our Life Insurance Companies. Excludes potential amounts for indemnification obligations included in asset sales agreements. See Note 11 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on indemnification obligations.
(b) Includes commitments to invest in private equity funds, hedge funds and other funds and commitments to purchase and develop real estate in the United States and abroad. The commitments to invest in private equity funds, hedge funds and other funds are called at the discretion of each fund, as needed for funding new investments or expenses of the fund. The expiration of these commitments is estimated in the table above based on the expected life cycle of the related fund, consistent with past trends of requirements for funding. Investors under these commitments are primarily insurance and real estate subsidiaries.
(c) Does not include guarantees, CMAs or other support arrangements among AIG consolidated entities.
(d) Primarily represents liquidity facilities provided in connection with certain municipal swap transactions and collateralized bond obligations.
(e) Includes a five-year senior unsecured revolving credit facility of up to $500 million between AerCap Ireland Capital Limited, as borrower, and AIG Parent, as lender (the AerCap Credit Facility) scheduled to mature in May 2019. The AerCap Credit Facility permits loans for general corporate purposes. At March 31, 2017, no amounts were outstanding under the AerCap Credit Facility.
(f) Excludes commitments with respect to pension plans. The remaining annual pension contribution for 2017 is expected to be approximately $52 million for U.S. and non-U.S. plans.
Arrangements with Variable Interest Entities
We enter into various arrangements with variable interest entities (VIEs) in the normal course of business, and we consolidate a VIE when we are the primary beneficiary of the entity. For a further discussion of our involvement with VIEs, see Note 8 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Indemnification Agreements
We are subject to financial guarantees and indemnity arrangements in connection with our sales of businesses. These arrangements may be triggered by declines in asset values, specified business contingencies, the realization of contingent liabilities, litigation developments, or breaches of representations, warranties or covenants provided by us. These arrangements are typically subject to time limitations, defined by contract or by operation of law, such as by prevailing statutes of limitation. Depending on the specific terms of the arrangements, the maximum potential obligation may or may not be subject to contractual limitations. For additional information regarding our indemnification agreements, see Note 11 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
We have recorded liabilities for certain of these arrangements where it is possible to estimate them. These liabilities are not material in the aggregate. We are unable to develop a reasonable estimate of the maximum potential payout under some of these arrangements. Overall, we believe that it is unlikely we will have to make any material payments under these arrangements.
The following table provides the rollforward of AIG’s total debt outstanding:
Balance at
Maturities
Effect of
Issuances
Repayments
Exchange
Changes
Debt issued or guaranteed by AIG:
AIG general borrowings:
Notes and bonds payable
19,432
19,460
Junior subordinated debt
843
847
AIG Japan Holdings Kabushiki Kaisha
AIGLH notes and bonds payable
AIGLH junior subordinated debt
Total AIG general borrowings
21,247
21,284
AIG borrowings supported by assets:(a)
MIP notes payable
Series AIGFP matched notes and bonds payable
GIAs, at fair value
2,934
(b)
2,923
Notes and bonds payable, at fair value
494
228
Total AIG borrowings supported by assets
4,559
4,316
Total debt issued or guaranteed by AIG
25,806
Debt not guaranteed by AIG:
Other subsidiaries' notes, bonds, loans and
mortgages payable(c)
735
Debt of consolidated investments(d)
4,371
(229)
(e) (f)
4,446
Total debt not guaranteed by AIG
5,106
(262)
5,147
Total debt
(630)
(a) AIG Parent guarantees all such debt, except for MIP notes payable and Series AIGFP matched notes and bonds payable, which are direct obligations of AIG Parent. Collateral posted to third parties was $2.3 billion and $2.2 billion at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. This collateral primarily consists of securities of the U.S. government and government sponsored entities and generally cannot be repledged or resold by the counterparties.
(b) Primarily represents adjustments to the fair value of debt.
(c) Includes primarily borrowings with Federal Home Loan Banks by our U.S. insurance companies. These borrowings are short term in nature and related activity is presented net of issuances and maturities and repayments.
(d) At March 31, 2017, includes debt of consolidated investment vehicles related to real estate investments of $1.8 billion, affordable housing partnership investments of $1.9 billion and other securitization vehicles of $761 million. At December 31, 2016, includes debt of consolidated investment vehicles related to real estate investments of $1.9 billion, affordable housing partnership investments of $1.7 billion and other securitization vehicles of $771 million.
(e) Includes the effect of consolidating previously unconsolidated partnerships.
(f) Includes $108 million related to certain real estate investments that were reclassified to Liabilities held for sale at March 31, 2017.
TOTAL DEBT OUTSTANDING
Debt Maturities
The following table summarizes maturing debt at March 31, 2017 of AIG (excluding $4.4 billion of borrowings of consolidated investments) for the next four quarters:
Second
Third
Fourth
First
Quarter
2018
AIG general borrowings
1,275
AIG borrowings supported by assets
1,032
mortgages payable
195
638
1,134
The following table presents maturities of long-term debt (including unamortized original issue discount, hedge accounting valuation adjustments and fair value adjustments, when applicable), excluding $4.4 billion in borrowings of debt of consolidated investments:
Year Ending
2020
997
1,343
1,503
12,847
1,714
14,336
AIG borrowings supported by assets:
768
Series AIGFP matched notes and
bonds payable
497
1,838
979
2,085
1,490
Other subsidiaries notes, bonds, loans
and mortgages payable
26,301
Credit ratings estimate a company’s ability to meet its obligations and may directly affect the cost and availability of financing to that company. The following table presents the credit ratings of AIG and certain of its subsidiaries as of April 28, 2017. Figures in parentheses indicate the relative ranking of the ratings within the agency’s rating categories; that ranking refers only to the major rating category and not to the modifiers assigned by the rating agencies.
Short-Term Debt
Senior Long-Term Debt
Moody’s
S&P
Moody’s(a)
S&P(b)
Fitch(c)
P-2 (2nd of 3)
A-2 (2nd of 8)
Baa 1 (4th of 9)
BBB+ (4th of 9)
Stable Outlook
Negative Outlook
AIG Financial Products Corp.(d)
P-2
A-2
Baa 1
BBB+
(a) Moody’s appends numerical modifiers 1, 2 and 3 to the generic rating categories to show relative position within the rating categories.
(b) S&P ratings may be modified by the addition of a plus or minus sign to show relative standing within the major rating categories.
(c) Fitch ratings may be modified by the addition of a plus or minus sign to show relative standing within the major rating categories.
(d) AIG guarantees all obligations of AIG Financial Products Corp.
These credit ratings are current opinions of the rating agencies. They may be changed, suspended or withdrawn at any time by the rating agencies as a result of changes in, or unavailability of, information or based on other circumstances. Ratings may also be withdrawn at our request.
We are party to some agreements that contain “ratings triggers.” Depending on the ratings maintained by one or more rating agencies, these triggers could result in (i) the termination or limitation of credit availability or a requirement for accelerated repayment, (ii) the termination of business contracts or (iii) a requirement to post collateral for the benefit of counterparties.
In the event of adverse actions on our long-term debt ratings by the major rating agencies, AIGFP and certain other AIG entities would be required to post additional collateral under some derivative transactions or could experience termination of the transactions. Such requirements and terminations could adversely affect our business, our consolidated results of operations in a reporting period or our liquidity. In the event of a further downgrade of AIG’s long-term senior debt ratings, AIGFP and certain other AIG entities would be required to post additional collateral, and certain of the counterparties of AIGFP or of such other AIG entities would be permitted to terminate their contracts early.
The actual amount of collateral that we would be required to post to counterparties in the event of such downgrades, or the aggregate amount of payments that we could be required to make, depends on market conditions, the fair value of outstanding affected transactions and other factors prevailing at the time of the downgrade.
For a discussion of the effects of downgrades in our credit ratings, see Note 9 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements herein and Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors – Liquidity, Capital and Credit in our 2016 Annual Report.
FINANCIAL STRENGTH Ratings
Financial Strength ratings estimate an insurance company’s ability to pay its obligations under an insurance policy. The following table presents the ratings of our significant insurance subsidiaries as of April 28, 2017.
A.M. Best
Fitch
National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa.
A+ / A-1+
A2
Lexington Insurance Company
A+
American Home Assurance Company (US)
American General Life Insurance Company
The Variable Annuity Life Insurance Company
United States Life Insurance Company in the City of New York
AIG Europe Limited
Fuji Fire and Marine Insurance Company
NR
AIU Insurance Company, Ltd.
These financial strength ratings are current opinions of the rating agencies. They may be changed, suspended or withdrawn at any time by the rating agencies as a result of changes in, or unavailability of, information or based on other circumstances.
For a discussion of the effects of downgrades in our financial strength ratings, see Note 9 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements herein and Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors – Liquidity, Capital and Credit in our 2016 Annual Report.
For a discussion of our regulation and supervision by different regulatory authorities in the United States and abroad, including with respect to our liquidity and capital resources, see Part 1, Item 1. Business — Regulation and Part 1, Item 1A. Risk Factors — Regulation in our 2016 Annual Report, and Part I, Item 2. MD&A – Regulatory Environment in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
On February 14, 2017, our Board of Directors declared a cash dividend on AIG Common Stock of $0.32 per share, payable on March 29, 2017 to shareholders of record on March 15, 2017. On May 3, 2017, our Board of Directors declared a cash dividend on AIG Common Stock of $0.32 per share, payable on June 28, 2017 to shareholders of record on June 14, 2017. The payment of any future dividends will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend on various factors, including the regulatory framework applicable to us, as discussed further in Note 12 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Our Board of Directors has authorized the repurchase of shares of AIG Common Stock through a series of actions. On May 3, 2017, our Board of Directors authorized an additional increase of $2.5 billion to the share repurchase authorization, resulting in an aggregate remaining authorization on such date of approximately $3.8 billion. Shares may be repurchased from time to time in the open market, private purchases, through forward, derivative, accelerated repurchase or automatic repurchase transactions or otherwise (including through the purchase of warrants). Certain of our share repurchases have been and may from time to time be effected through Exchange Act Rule 10b5-1 repurchase plans. The timing of any future share repurchases will depend on market conditions, our financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and other factors, including the regulatory framework applicable to us.
During the first quarter of 2017, we repurchased approximately 56 million shares of AIG Common Stock for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $3.6 billion pursuant to this authorization. Under Exchange Act Rule 10b5-1 repurchase plans, from April 1 to May 3, 2017, we repurchased approximately $1.1 billion of additional shares of AIG Common Stock.
Payments of dividends to AIG by its insurance subsidiaries are subject to certain restrictions imposed by regulatory authorities. See Note 19 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the 2016 Annual Report for a discussion of restrictions on payments of dividends by our subsidiaries.
Risk management includes the identification and measurement of various forms of risk, the establishment of risk thresholds and the creation of processes intended to maintain risks within these thresholds while optimizing returns. We consider risk management an integral part of managing our core businesses and a key element of our approach to corporate governance.
We have an integrated process for managing risks throughout our organization in accordance with our firm‑wide risk appetite. Our Board of Directors has oversight responsibility for the management of risk. Our Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Department supervises and integrates the risk management functions in each of our business units, providing senior management with a consolidated view of AIG’s major risk positions. Within each business unit, senior leaders and executives approve risk‑taking policies and targeted risk tolerance within the framework provided by ERM. ERM supports our businesses and management in the embedding of risk management in our key day-to-day business processes and in identifying, assessing, quantifying, managing, monitoring and reporting, and mitigating the risks taken by us and our businesses. Nevertheless, our risk management efforts may not always be successful and material adverse effects on our business, results of operations, cash flows, liquidity or financial condition may occur.
For a further discussion of AIG’s risk management program, see Part II, Item 7. MD&A ─ Enterprise Risk Management in the 2016 Annual Report.
Credit risk is defined as the risk that our customers or counterparties are unable or unwilling to repay their contractual obligations when they become due. Credit risk may also result from a downgrade of a counterparty’s credit ratings or a widening of its credit spreads.
We devote considerable resources to managing our direct and indirect credit exposures. These exposures may arise from, but are not limited to, fixed income investments, equity securities, deposits, commercial paper investments, reverse repurchase agreements and repurchase agreements, corporate and consumer loans, leases, reinsurance recoverables, counterparty risk arising from derivatives activities, collateral extended to counterparties, insurance risk cessions to third parties, financial guarantees and letters of credit.
We monitor and control our company-wide credit risk concentrations and attempt to avoid unwanted or excessive risk accumulations, whether funded or unfunded. To minimize the level of credit risk in some circumstances, we may require mitigants, such as third‑party guarantees, reinsurance or collateral, including commercial bank-issued letters of credit and trust collateral accounts. We treat these guarantees, reinsurance recoverables, and letters of credit as credit exposure and include them in our risk concentration exposure data. We also monitor closely the quality of any trust collateral accounts.
See Investments – Available for Sale Securities herein for further information on our credit concentrations and credit exposures.
Our credit risk management framework incorporates the following elements:
Risk Identification: including the ongoing capture and monitoring of all existing, contingent, potential and emerging credit risk exposures, whether funded or unfunded;
Risk Measurement: comprising risk ratings, default probabilities, loss given default and expected loss parameters, exposure calculations, stress testing and other risk analytics;
Risk Limits: including, but not limited to, a system of single obligor or risk group-based AIG-wide house limits and sub-limits for corporates, financial institutions, sovereigns and sub-sovereigns when appropriate and a defined process for identifying, evaluating, documenting and approving, if appropriate, breaches of and exceptions to such limits;
Risk Delegations: a comprehensive credit risk delegation framework from the AIG Chief Credit Officer (CCO) to authorized credit professionals throughout the company;
Risk Evaluation, Monitoring and Reporting: including the ongoing analysis and assessment of credit risks, trending of those risks and reporting of other key risk metrics and limits to the AIG CCO and senior management, as may be required; and
Credit Reserving: including but not limited to development of a proper framework, policies and procedures for establishing accurate identification of (i) Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses, and (ii) other-than-temporary impairments for securities portfolios.
Market risk is defined as the risk of adverse impact due to systemic movements in one or more of the following market risk drivers: equity and commodity prices, residential and commercial real estate values, interest rates, credit spreads, foreign exchange, inflation, and their levels of volatility.
We are engaged in a variety of insurance, investment and other financial services businesses that expose us to market risk, directly and indirectly. We are exposed to market risks primarily within our insurance and capital markets activities, on both the asset and liability side of our balance sheet through on and off-balance sheet exposures. The chief risk officer within each business is responsible for creating a framework to properly identify these risks, then ensuring that they are appropriately measured, monitored and managed in accordance with the risk governance framework established by the Chief Market Risk Officer (CMRO).
The scope and magnitude of our market risk exposures is managed under a robust framework that contains defined risk limits and minimum standards for managing market risk in a manner consistent with our risk appetite statement. Our market risk management framework focuses on quantifying the financial repercussions of changes in these broad market observables, as opposed to the idiosyncratic risks associated with individual assets that are addressed through our credit risk management function.
Risk Identification
Market risk focuses on quantifying the financial repercussions of changes in broad, external, predominantly market observable risks. Financial repercussions can include an adverse impact on results of operations, financial condition, liquidity and capital.
Each of the following systemic risks is considered a market risk:
Equity prices. We are exposed to changes in equity market prices affecting a variety of instruments. Changes in equity prices can affect the valuation of publicly-traded equity shares, investments in private equity, hedge funds and mutual funds, exchange-traded funds, and other equity-linked capital market instruments as well as equity-linked insurance products, including but not limited to index annuities, variable annuities, universal life insurance and variable universal life insurance.
Residential and commercial real estate values. Our investment portfolios are exposed to the risk of changing values in a variety of residential and commercial real estate investments. Changes in residential/commercial real estate prices can affect the valuation of residential/commercial mortgages, residential/commercial mortgage‑backed securities and other structured securities with underlying assets that include residential/commercial mortgages, trusts that include residential/commercial real estate and/or mortgages, residential mortgage insurance contracts and commercial real estate investments.
Interest rates. Interest rate risk can arise from a mismatch in the interest rate exposure of assets versus liabilities. Lower interest rates generally result in lower investment income and make some of our product offerings less attractive to investors. Conversely, higher interest rates are typically beneficial for the opposite reasons. However, when rates rise quickly, there can be a temporary asymmetric GAAP accounting effect where the existing securities lose market value, which is largely reported in Other comprehensive income, and the offsetting decrease in the value of related liabilities may not be recognized. Changes in interest rates can affect the valuation of fixed maturity securities, financial liabilities, insurance contracts including but not limited to fixed rate annuities, variable annuities and derivative contracts.
Credit spreads. Credit spreads measure an instrument’s risk premium or yield relative to that of a comparable duration, default‑free instrument. Changes in credit spreads can affect the valuation of fixed maturity securities, including but not limited to corporate bonds, ABS, mortgage-backed securities, AIG-issued debt obligations, credit derivatives and derivative credit valuation adjustments. Much like higher interest rates, wider credit spreads with unchanged default losses mean more investment income in the long‑term. In the short term, quickly rising spreads will cause a loss in the value of existing fixed maturity securities, which is largely reported in Other comprehensive income. A precipitous widening of credit spreads may also signal a fundamental weakness in the credit‑worthiness of bond obligors, potentially resulting in default losses.
Foreign exchange (FX) rates. We are a globally diversified enterprise with income, assets and liabilities denominated in, and capital deployed in, a variety of currencies. Changes in FX rates can affect the valuation of a broad range of balance sheet and income statement items as well as the settlement of cash flows exchanged in specific transactions.
Commodity Prices. Changes in commodity prices (the value of commodities) can affect the valuation of publicly‑traded commodities, commodity indices and derivatives on commodities and commodity indices. We are exposed to commodity prices primarily through their impact on the prices and credit quality of commodity producers’ debt and equity securities in our investment portfolio.
Inflation. Changes in inflation can affect the valuation of fixed maturity securities, including AIG-issued debt obligations, derivatives and other contracts explicitly linked to inflation indices, and insurance contracts where the claims are linked to inflation either explicitly, via indexing, or implicitly, through medical costs or wage levels.
Risk Measurement
Our market risk measurement framework was developed with the main objective of communicating the range and scale of our market risk exposures. At the firm‑wide level market risk is measured in a manner that is consistent with AIG’s risk appetite statement. This is designed to ensure that we remain within our stated risk tolerance levels and can determine how much additional market risk taking capacity is available within our framework. Our risk appetite is currently defined in terms of capital and liquidity levels. At the market risk level, the framework measures our overall exposure to each systemic market risk change on an economic basis.
In addition, we continue to use enhanced economic, GAAP accounting and statutory capital‑based risk measures at the market risk level, business‑unit level and firm‑wide levels. This process aims to ensure that we have a comprehensive view of the impact of our market risk exposures.
We use a number of approaches to measure our market risk exposure, including:
Sensitivity analysis. Sensitivity analysis measures the impact from a unit change in a market risk input. Examples of such sensitivities include a one basis point increase in yield on fixed maturity securities, a one basis point increase in credit spreads of fixed maturity securities, and a one percent increase in prices of equity securities.
Scenario analysis. Scenario analysis uses historical, hypothetical, or forward‑looking macroeconomic scenarios to assess and report exposures. Examples of hypothetical scenarios include a 100 basis point parallel shift in the yield curve or a 20 percent immediate and simultaneous decrease in world‑wide equity markets. Scenarios may also utilize a stochastic framework to arrive at a probability distribution of losses.
Stress testing. Stress testing is a special form of scenario analysis in which the scenarios are designed to lead to a material adverse outcome. Examples of such scenarios include the stock market crash of October 1987 or the widening of yields or spreads of RMBS or CMBS during 2008.
Market Risk Sensitivities
The following table provides estimates of our sensitivity to changes in yield curves, equity prices and foreign currency exchange rates:
Balance Sheet Exposure
Balance Sheet Effect
Sensitivity factor
100 bps parallel increase in all yield curves
Interest rate sensitive assets:
241,287
251,784
(14,082)
(14,745)
25,814
25,113
(1,417)
(1,352)
Total interest rate sensitive assets
267,115
276,914
(15,500)
(16,098)
20% decline in stock prices and value of
alternative investments
Equity and alternative investments exposure:
Real estate investments
(1,380)
Hedge funds
7,249
(1,450)
Private equity
5,812
6,130
(1,163)
(1,226)
Common equity
(263)
(274)
PICC Investment
Aircraft asset investments
Total equity and alternative investments
exposure
22,816
23,354
(4,563)
(4,671)
10% depreciation of all foreign currency
exchange rates against the U.S. dollar
Foreign currency-denominated net
asset position:
Great Britain pound
2,166
2,274
(217)
Euro
1,881
2,000
Japanese yen
1,682
2,345
(168)
(235)
All other foreign currencies
2,613
3,210
(261)
(321)
Total foreign currency-denominated net
asset position(b)
8,342
9,829
(834)
(983)
(a) At March 31, 2017, the analysis covered $267.1 billion of $281.6 billion interest-rate sensitive assets. Excluded were $8.1 billion of loans and $2.1 billion of investments in life settlements. In addition, $4.3 billion of assets across various asset categories were excluded due to modeling limitations. At December 31, 2016, the analysis covered $276.9 billion of $292.5 billion interest-rate sensitive assets. Excluded were $8.1 billion of loans and $2.5 billion of investments in life settlements. In addition, $5.0 billion of assets across various asset categories were excluded due to modeling limitations.
(b) The majority of the foreign currency exposure is reported on a one quarter lag.
Foreign currency-denominated net asset position reflects our consolidated non‑U.S. dollar assets less our consolidated non‑U.S dollar liabilities on a GAAP basis, with certain adjustments. We use a bottom-up approach in managing our foreign currency exchange rate exposures with the objective of protecting statutory capital at the regulated insurance entity level. At the AIG Parent level, we monitor our single foreign currency exposures and limit the risk of the aggregate currency portfolio.
Our foreign currency-denominated net asset position at March 31, 2017, decreased by $1.5 billion compared to December 31, 2016. The decrease was primarily due to a $663 million decrease in our Japanese yen position primarily due to unrealized depreciation of investments, and weakening of the yen against the U.S. dollar; a $188 million decrease in our Taiwan dollar position due to the sale of our Taiwan insurance unit; and a $119 million and $108 million decrease in our euro and British pound positions, respectively, due to the weakening of the euro and pound against the U.S. dollar.
For illustrative purposes, we modeled our sensitivities based on a 100 basis point increase in yield curves, a 20 percent decline in equities and alternative assets, and a 10 percent depreciation of all foreign currency exchange rates against the U.S. dollar. The estimated results presented in the table above should not be taken as a prediction, but only as a demonstration of the potential effects of such events.
Liquidity risk is defined as the risk that our financial condition will be adversely affected by the inability or perceived inability to meet our short-term cash, collateral or other financial obligations. Failure to appropriately manage liquidity risk can result in insolvency, reduced operating flexibility, increased costs, reputational harm and regulatory action.
AIG and its legal entities seek to maintain sufficient liquidity during both the normal course of business and under defined liquidity stress scenarios to ensure that sufficient cash will be available to meet the obligations as they come due.
AIG Parent liquidity risk tolerance levels are designed to allow us to meet our financial obligations for a minimum of six months under a liquidity stress scenario. We maintain liquidity limits and minimum coverage ratios designed to ensure that funding needs are met under varying market conditions. If we project that we will breach these tolerances, we will assess and determine appropriate liquidity management actions. However, the market conditions in effect at that time may not permit us to achieve an increase in liquidity sources or a reduction in liquidity requirements.
The following sources of liquidity and funding risks could impact our ability to meet short-term financial obligations as they come due.
• Market/Monetization Risk: Assets may not be readily transformed into cash due to unfavorable market conditions. Market liquidity risk may limit our ability to sell assets at reasonable values to meet liquidity needs.
• Cash Flow Mismatch Risk: Discrete and cumulative cash flow mismatches or gaps over short-term horizons under both expected and adverse business conditions may create future liquidity shortfalls.
• Event Funding Risk: Additional funding may be required as the result of a trigger event. Event funding risk comes in many forms and may result from a downgrade in credit ratings, a market event, or some other event that creates a funding obligation or limits existing funding options.
• Financing Risk: We may be unable to raise additional cash on a secured or unsecured basis due to unfavorable market conditions, AIG-specific issues, or any other issue that impedes access to additional funding.
Comprehensive cash flow projections under normal conditions are the primary component for identifying and measuring liquidity risk. We produce comprehensive liquidity projections over varying time horizons that incorporate all relevant liquidity sources and uses and include known and likely cash inflows and outflows. In addition, we perform stress testing by identifying liquidity stress scenarios and assessing the effects of these scenarios on our cash flow and liquidity.
We use a number of approaches to measure our liquidity risk exposure, including:
Minimum Liquidity Limits: Minimum Liquidity Limits specify the amount of assets required to be maintained in specific liquidity portfolios to meet obligations as they arise over a specified time horizon under stressed liquidity conditions.
Coverage Ratios: Coverage Ratios measure the adequacy of available liquidity sources, including the ability to monetize assets to meet the forecasted cash flows over a specified time horizon. The portfolio of assets is selected based on our ability to convert those assets into cash under the assumed market conditions and within the specified time horizon.
Cash Flow Forecasts: Cash Flow Forecasts measure the liquidity needed for a specific legal entity over a specified time horizon.
Stress Testing: Asset liquidity and Coverage Ratios are re-measured under defined liquidity stress scenarios that will impact net cash flows, liquid assets and/or other funding sources.
Relevant liquidity reporting is produced and reported regularly to AIG Parent and business unit risk committees. The frequency, content, and nature of reporting will vary for each business unit and legal entity, based on its complexity, risk profile, activities and size.
Our operations around the world are subject to regulation by many different types of regulatory authorities, including insurance, securities, derivatives, investment advisory and thrift regulators in the United States and abroad.
Our insurance subsidiaries are subject to regulation and supervision by the states and jurisdictions in which they do business. The insurance and financial services industries generally have been subject to heightened regulatory scrutiny and supervision in recent years.
On June 23, 2016, the UK held a referendum in which a majority voted for the UK to withdraw its membership in the EU, commonly referred to as Brexit. The terms of withdrawal are subject to a formal negotiation period which was initiated on March 29, 2017 through the invocation of Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union. Negotiations on Brexit could, by treaty, last up to two years. It is not clear at this stage (and may not be for some time) what form the UK’s future relationship with the remaining EU member states will take. We have significant operations and employees in the UK and other EU member states, including AIG Europe Ltd., which enjoys certain benefits based on the UK’s membership in the EU. In order to adapt to Brexit, on March 8, 2017, we announced plans to reorganize our operations and legal entity structure in the UK and the EU through the establishment of a new European subsidiary in Luxembourg. The reorganization is expected to be completed in the fourth quarter of 2018, subject to regulatory approvals.
For additional information about the DOL Fiduciary Rule, see Item 2. Executive Summary – Department of Labor Fiduciary Duty Rule.
In addition to the information set forth in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, our regulatory status is also discussed in Part I, Item 1. Business – Regulation, Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors – Regulation and Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the 2016 Annual Report.
Accident year The annual calendar accounting period in which loss events occurred, regardless of when the losses are actually reported, booked or paid.
Accident year combined ratio, as adjusted The combined ratio excluding catastrophe losses and related reinstatement premiums, prior year development, net of premium adjustments, and the impact of reserve discounting.
Accident year loss ratio, as adjusted The loss ratio excluding catastrophe losses and related reinstatement premiums, prior year development, net of premium adjustments, and the impact of reserve discounting.
Acquisition ratio Acquisition costs divided by net premiums earned. Acquisition costs are those costs incurred to acquire new and renewal insurance contracts and also include the amortization of VOBA and DAC. Acquisition costs vary with sales and include, but are not limited to, commissions, premium taxes, direct marketing costs and certain costs of personnel engaged in sales support activities such as underwriting.
Base Spread Net investment income excluding income from alternative investments and other enhancements, less interest credited excluding amortization of sales inducement assets.
Base Yield Net investment income excluding income from alternative investments and other enhancements, as a percentage of average base invested asset portfolio, which excludes alternative investments, other bond securities and certain other investments for which the fair value option has been elected.
Book value per common share, excluding accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI), Book value per common share, excluding AOCI and deferred tax assets (DTA) (Adjusted book value per common share) and Adjusted book value per common share, including dividend growth are non-GAAP measures and are used to show the amount of our net worth on a per-share basis. Book value per common share excluding AOCI is derived by dividing total AIG shareholders’ equity, excluding AOCI, by total common shares outstanding. Adjusted book value per common share is derived by dividing total AIG shareholders’ equity, excluding AOCI and DTA (Adjusted Shareholders’ Equity), by total common shares outstanding. Adjusted book value per common share, including dividend growth is derived by dividing Adjusted Shareholders’ Equity, including growth in quarterly dividends above $0.125 per share to shareholders, by total common shares outstanding.
Casualty insurance Insurance that is primarily associated with the losses caused by injuries to third persons, i.e., not the insured, and the legal liability imposed on the insured as a result.
Combined ratio Sum of the loss ratio and the acquisition and general operating expense ratios.
CSA Credit Support Annex A legal document generally associated with an ISDA Master Agreement that provides for collateral postings which could vary depending on ratings and threshold levels.
CVA Credit Valuation Adjustment The CVA adjusts the valuation of derivatives to account for nonperformance risk of our counterparty with respect to all net derivative assets positions. Also, the CVA reflects the fair value movement in AIGFP's asset portfolio that is attributable to credit movements only, without the impact of other market factors such as interest rates and foreign exchange rates. Finally, the CVA also accounts for our own credit risk in the fair value measurement of all derivative net liability positions and liabilities where AIG has elected the fair value option, when appropriate.
DAC Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs Deferred costs that are incremental and directly related to the successful acquisition of new business or renewal of existing business.
DAC Related to Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) of Investments An adjustment to DAC for investment-oriented products, equal to the change in DAC amortization that would have been recorded if fixed maturity and equity securities available for sale had been sold at their stated aggregate fair value and the proceeds reinvested at current yields (also referred to as “shadow DAC”).
Deferred Gain on Retroactive Reinsurance Retroactive reinsurance is a reinsurance contract in which an assuming entity agrees to reimburse a ceding entity for liabilities incurred as a result of past insurable events. If the amount of premium paid by the ceding reinsurer is less than the related ceded loss reserves, the resulting gain is deferred and amortized over the settlement period of the reserves. Any related development on the ceded loss reserves recoverable under the contract would increase the deferred gain if unfavorable, or decrease the deferred gain if favorable.
Expense ratio Sum of acquisition expenses and general operating expenses, divided by net premiums earned.
General operating expense ratio General operating expenses divided by net premiums earned. General operating expenses are those costs that are generally attributed to the support infrastructure of the organization and include but are not limited to personnel costs, projects and bad debt expenses. General operating expenses exclude losses and loss adjustment expenses incurred, acquisition expenses, and investment expenses.
GIC/GIA Guaranteed Investment Contract/Guaranteed Investment Agreement A contract whereby the seller provides a guaranteed repayment of principal and a fixed or floating interest rate for a predetermined period of time.
G-SII Global Systemically Important Insurer An insurer that is deemed globally systemically important (that is, of such size, market importance and global interconnectedness that the distress or failure of the insurer would cause significant dislocation in the global financial system and adverse economic consequences across a range of countries) by the Financial Stability Board, in consultation with and based on a methodology developed by the International Association of Insurance Supervisors.
IBNR Incurred But Not Reported Estimates of claims that have been incurred but not reported to us.
ISDA Master Agreement An agreement between two counterparties, which may have multiple derivative transactions with each other governed by such agreement, that generally provides for the net settlement of all or a specified group of these derivative transactions, as well as pledged collateral, through a single payment, in a single currency, in the event of a default on, or affecting any, one derivative transaction or a termination event affecting all, or a specified group of, derivative transactions.
LAE Loss Adjustment Expenses The expenses directly attributed to settling and paying claims of insureds and include, but are not limited to, legal fees, adjuster’s fees and the portion of general expenses allocated to claim settlement costs.
Life Insurance Companies include the following major operating companies: American General Life Insurance Company (American General Life), The Variable Annuity Life Insurance Company (VALIC) and The United States Life Insurance Company in the City of New York (U.S. Life).
Loss Ratio Losses and loss adjustment expenses incurred divided by net premiums earned.
Loss reserve development The increase or decrease in incurred losses and loss adjustment expenses related to prior years as a result of the re-estimation of loss reserves at successive valuation dates for a given group of claims.
Loss reserves Liability for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses. The estimated ultimate cost of settling claims relating to insured events that have occurred on or before the balance sheet date, whether or not reported to the insurer at that date.
Loan-to-Value Ratio Principal amount of loan amount divided by appraised value of collateral securing the loan.
Master netting agreement An agreement between two counterparties who have multiple derivative contracts with each other that provides for the net settlement of all contracts covered by such agreement, as well as pledged collateral, through a single payment, in a single currency, in the event of default on or upon termination of any one such contract.
Natural catastrophe losses are generally weather or seismic events having a net impact on AIG in excess of $10 million each. Catastrophes also include certain man-made events, such as terrorism and civil disorders that meet the $10 million threshold.
Net premiums written Represent the sales of an insurer, adjusted for reinsurance premiums assumed and ceded, during a given period. Net premiums earned are the revenue of an insurer for covering risk during a given period. Net premiums written are a measure of performance for a sales period, while Net premiums earned are a measure of performance for a coverage period.
Nonbank SIFI Nonbank Systemically Important Financial Institutions Financial institutions are deemed nonbank systemically important (that is, the failure of the financial institution could pose a threat to the financial stability of the United States) by the Financial Stability Oversight Council based on a three-stage analytical process.
Noncontrolling interest The portion of equity ownership in a consolidated subsidiary not attributable to the controlling parent company.
Operating revenue excludes Net realized capital gains (losses), income from non-operating litigation settlements (included in Other income for GAAP purposes) and changes in fair value of securities used to hedge guaranteed living benefits (included in Net investment income for GAAP purposes).
Policy fees An amount added to a policy premium, or deducted from a policy cash value or contract holder account, to reflect the cost of issuing a policy, establishing the required records, sending premium notices and other related expenses.
Pool A reinsurance arrangement whereby all of the underwriting results of the pool members are combined and then shared by each member in accordance with its pool participation percentage.
Premiums and deposits – Institutional Marketsinclude direct and assumed amounts received and earned on group benefit policies and life-contingent payout annuities, and deposits received on investment-type annuity contracts, including GICs.
Premiums and deposits – Individual Retirement and Group Retirement and – Life Insurance include direct and assumed amounts received on traditional life insurance policies and group benefit policies, and deposits on life-contingent payout annuities, as well as deposits received on universal life, investment-type annuity contracts and mutual funds.
Prior year development See Loss reserve development.
Property Casualty Insurance Companies include the following major operating companies: National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. (National Union); American Home Assurance Company (American Home); Lexington Insurance Company (Lexington); Fuji Fire and Marine Insurance Company Limited (Fuji Fire); American Home Assurance Company, Ltd. (American Home Japan); AIU Insurance Company, Ltd. (AIUI Japan); AIG Asia Pacific Insurance, Pte, Ltd.; and AIG Europe Limited.
RBC Risk-Based Capital A formula designed to measure the adequacy of an insurer’s statutory surplus compared to the risks inherent in its business.
Reinstatement premium Additional premiums payable to reinsurers to restore coverage limits that have been exhausted as a result of reinsured losses under certain excess of loss reinsurance treaties.
Reinsurance The practice whereby one insurer, the reinsurer, in consideration of a premium paid to that insurer, agrees to indemnify another insurer, the ceding company, for part or all of the liability of the ceding company under one or more policies or contracts of insurance which it has issued.
Retroactive Reinsurance See Deferred Gain on Retroactive Reinsurance.
Return on equity – After-tax operating income excluding AOCI and DTA (Adjusted Return on Equity) is a non-GAAP measure and is used to show the rate of return on shareholders’ equity. Adjusted Return on Equity is derived by dividing actual or annualized after-tax operating income attributable to AIG by average Adjusted Shareholders’ Equity.
Salvage The amount that can be recovered by an insurer for the sale of damaged goods for which a policyholder has been indemnified (and to which title was transferred).
Severe losses Individual non-catastrophe first party losses and surety losses greater than $10 million, net of related reinsurance and salvage and subrogation. Severe losses include claims related to satellite explosions, plane crashes, and shipwrecks.
SIA Sales Inducement Asset Represents enhanced crediting rates or bonus payments to contract holders on certain annuity and investment contract products that meet the criteria to be deferred and amortized over the life of the contract.
Solvency II Legislation in the European Union which reforms the insurance industry’s solvency framework, including minimum capital and solvency requirements, governance requirements, risk management and public reporting standards. The Solvency II Directive (2009/138/EEC) was adopted on November 25, 2009 and became effective on January 1, 2016.
Subrogation The amount of recovery for claims we have paid our policyholders, generally from a negligent third party or such party’s insurer.
Surrender charge A charge levied against an investor for the early withdrawal of funds from a life insurance or annuity contract, or for the cancellation of the agreement.
Surrender rate represents annualized surrenders and withdrawals as a percentage of average reserves and Group Retirement mutual fund assets under administration.
Unearned premium reserve Liabilities established by insurers and reinsurers to reflect unearned premiums, which are usually refundable to policyholders if an insurance or reinsurance contract is canceled prior to expiration of the contract term.
VOBA Value of Business Acquired Present value of projected future gross profits from in-force policies of acquired businesses.
A&HAccident and Health Insurance
GMWB Guaranteed Minimum Withdrawal Benefits
ABS Asset-Backed Securities
ISDA International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc.
CDO Collateralized Debt Obligations
Moody'sMoody's Investors’ Service Inc.
CDS Credit Default Swap
NAIC National Association of Insurance Commissioners
CMA Capital Maintenance Agreement
NM Not Meaningful
CMBS Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities
OTCOver-the-Counter
EGPs Estimated gross profits
OTTI Other-Than-Temporary Impairment
FASB Financial Accounting Standards Board
RMBS Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities
FRBNY Federal Reserve Bank of New York
S&P Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC
GAAP Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
SEC Securities and Exchange Commission
GMDB Guaranteed Minimum Death Benefits
URR Unearned revenue reserve
GMIB Guaranteed Minimum Income Benefits
VIE Variable Interest Entity
ITEM 3 | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Included in Part I, Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Enterprise Risk Management.
ITEM 4 |Controls and Procedures
Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. In connection with the preparation of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, an evaluation was carried out by AIG’s management, with the participation of AIG’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of AIG’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act). Based on that evaluation, AIG’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that AIG’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 31, 2017.
There has been no change in AIG’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the quarter ended March 31, 2017, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, AIG’s internal control over financial reporting.
Part II – Other Information
ITEM 1 | Legal Proceedings
For a discussion of legal proceedings, see Note 11 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, which is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 1A | Risk Factors
In addition to the other information set forth in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, you should carefully consider the risk factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors in our 2016 Annual Report.
ITEM 2 | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
The following table provides the information with respect to purchases made by or on behalf of AIG or any “affiliated purchaser” (as defined in Rule 10b‑18(a)(3) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) of AIG Common Stock and warrants to purchase AIG Common Stock during the three months ended March 31, 2017:
Total Number
Average
Total Number of Shares
Approximate Dollar Value of Shares
of Shares
Price Paid
Purchased as Part of Publicly
that May Yet Be Purchased Under the
Period
Repurchased
per Share
Announced Plans or Programs
Plans or Programs (in millions)
Janaury 1 – 31
11,555,539
66.13
February 1 – 28
17,900,976
64.07
4,129
March 1 – 31
26,538,233
63.06
2,401
55,994,748
64.02
* On May 3, 2017, our Board of Directors authorized an additional increase to the repurchase authorization of AIG Common Stock of $2.5 billion, resulting in an aggregate remaining authorization on such date of approximately $3.8 billion. Shares may be repurchased from time to time in the open market, private purchases, through forward, derivative, accelerated repurchase or automatic repurchase transactions or otherwise (including through the purchase of warrants). Certain of our share repurchases have been and may from time to time be effected through Exchange Act Rule 10b5-1 repurchase plans. The timing of any future share repurchases will depend on market conditions, our financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and other factors, including the regulatory framework applicable to us.
During the three-month period ended March 31, 2017, we repurchased approximately 56 million shares of AIG Common Stock under this authorization for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $3.6 billion. Pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 10b5-1 plans, from April 1, 2017 to May 3, 2017, we have repurchased approximately $1.1 billion of additional shares of AIG Common Stock.
ITEM 4 |Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
ITEM 6 | Exhibits
See accompanying Exhibit Index.
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC.
(Registrant)
/S/ SIDDHARTHA SANKARAN
Siddhartha Sankaran
Executive Vice President
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
/S/ ELIAS F. HABAYEB
Elias F. Habayeb
Senior Vice President,
Deputy Chief Financial Officer and
Group Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)
Dated: May 4, 2017
Exhibit Index
ExhibitNumber
Description
Location
(1) American International Group, Inc. Long Term Incentive Plan*
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to AIG’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 17, 2017 (File No. 1-8787).
(2) Form of AIG Long Term Incentive Award Agreement*
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to AIG’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 17, 2017 (File No. 1-8787).
(3) Letter Agreement between American International Group, Inc. and Peter D. Hancock, dated March 17, 2017*
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to AIG’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 17, 2017 (File No. 1-8787).
(4) Aggregate Excess of Loss Reinsurance Agreement, dated January 20, 2017, by and between AIG Assurance Company, AIG Property Casualty Company, AIG Specialty Insurance Company, AIU Insurance Company, American Home Assurance Company, Commerce and Industry Insurance Company, Granite State Insurance Company, Illinois National Insurance Co., Lexington Insurance Company, National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa., New Hampshire Insurance Company and The Insurance Company Of The State Of Pennsylvania and National Indemnity Company (portions of this exhibit have been redacted pursuant to confidential treatment granted by the SEC)
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to AIG’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 14, 2017 (File No. 1-8787).
(5) Trust Agreement, dated January 20, 2017, by and among National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa., National Indemnity Company, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (portions of this exhibit have been redacted pursuant to confidential treatment granted by the SEC)
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to AIG’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 14, 2017 (File No. 1-8787).
(6) Parental Guarantee Agreement, dated January 20, 2017, by Berkshire Hathaway Inc. in favor of National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to AIG’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 14, 2017 (File No. 1-8787).
(7) Letter Agreement, dated November 3, 2010, between AIG and Siddhartha Sankaran*
Filed herewith.
(8) Non-Competition, Non-Solicitation and Non-Disclosure Agreement, dated November 5, 2010, between AIG and Siddhartha Sankaran*
(9) Letter Agreement, dated July 22, 2015, between AIG and Douglas A. Dachille*
(10) Non-Solicitation and Non-Disclosure Agreement, dated July 22, 2015, between AIG and Douglas A. Dachille*
Statement re: Computation of Per Share Earnings
Included in Note 13 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications
Section 1350 Certifications**
Interactive data files pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T: (i) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, (iii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Equity for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, (iv) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, (v) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 and (vi) the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
* This exhibit is a management contract or a compensatory plan or arrangement.
** This information is furnished and not filed for purposes of Sections 11 and 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.