FORM 10-K SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. (Mark One) X ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1995 OR TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from ____________________ to ____________________ Commission file number 0-14714 ASTEC INDUSTRIES, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Tennessee 62-0873631 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) P. O. Box 72787, 4101 Jerome Avenue, Chattanooga, Tennessee 37407 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (423) 867-4210 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class NONE Name of each exchange on which registered NONE Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, $.20 par value (Title of class) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No Exhibit Index Appears at Page 49 (Form 10-K Cover Page - Continued) Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [ ] The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $68,094,670 based upon the closing sales price reported by the NASDAQ National Market on March 11, 1996, using beneficial ownership of stock rules adopted pursuant to Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to exclude voting stock owned by all directors and executive officers of the registrant, some of whom may not be held to be affiliates upon judicial determination. (APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE REGISTRANTS) Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: As of March 11, 1996 Common Stock, par value $.20 -- 10,037,199 shares DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE Portions of the following documents have been incorporated by reference into the Parts of this Annual Report on Form 10-K indicated: Document Form 10-K Proxy Statement relating to Part III Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on April 25, 1996 ASTEC INDUSTRIES, INC. 1995 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page PART I Item 1. Business Item 2. Properties Item 3. Legal Proceedings Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders Executive Officers of the Registrant PART II Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Shareholder Matters Item 6. Selected Financial Data Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure PART III Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant Item 11. Executive Compensation Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions PART IV Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K Appendix A SIGNATURES PART I Item 1. BUSINESS General Astec Industries, Inc. (the "Company") is a Tennessee corporation which was incorporated in 1972. The Company designs, engineers, manufactures and markets equipment and components used primarily in road building and related construction activities. The Company's products are used in each phase of road building, from quarrying and crushing the aggregate to application of the road surface. The Company also manufactures certain equipment and components unrelated to road construction, including trenching and excavating equipment, environmental remediation equipment, log loading and industrial heat transfer equipment. The Company holds over 70 United States and foreign patents, and has been responsible for many technological and engineering innovations in the industry. The Company currently manufactures over 135 different products which it markets both domestically and internationally. In addition to plant and equipment sales, the Company manufactures and sells replacement parts for equipment in each of its product lines. The distribution and sale of replacement parts is an integral part of the Company's business. The Company's six operating subsidiaries are: (i) Astec, Inc., which manufactures a line of hot mix asphalt plants, soil purification and environmental remediation equipment and related components; (ii) Telsmith, Inc., which manufactures aggregate processing equipment for the production and classification of sand, gravel and crushed stone for road and other construction applications; (iii) Heatec, Inc., which manufactures thermal oil heaters, asphalt heaters and other heat transfer equipment used in the Company's asphalt mixing plants and in other industries; (iv) Roadtec, Inc., which manufactures milling machines used to recycle asphalt and concrete, asphalt paving equipment and material transfer vehicles; (v) Trencor, Inc., which manufactures chain and wheel trenching equipment, excavating equipment and log loaders and; (vi) CEI Enterprises, Inc., which manufactures heat transfer equipment and recycled rubber blending systems for the hot mix asphalt industry. CEI was acquired in the first quarter of 1995. The Company's strategy is to become the high quality, low cost producer in each of its product lines while continuing to develop innovative new products for its customers. With the disposition of its foreign operations described below, management believes that the Company is well positioned to capitalize on the current need to rebuild and enhance roadway infrastructure both in the United States and abroad. Disposition of Foreign Operating Subsidiaries In 1993, the Company acquired a 50% ownership interest in Wibau-Astec Maschinenfabrik GmbH, a newly formed German limited liability company to engage in the manufacture and marketing of asphalt plants and certain related equipment in Granadau, Germany. The Company acquired the remaining 50% interest in Wibau-Astec in 1994, making it a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. In June 1995 the Company sold Wibau-Astec to Wirtgen Gesellschaft mit beschr*nkter Haftung, a German equipment manufacturer. See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company's Annual Report to Shareholders for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1995, which information is incorporated by reference under item 8 of this Report. In an unrelated transaction, the Company acquired Gibat Ohl Ingenieurgesellschaft fur Anlagentechnik mbH located in Hasselroth, Germany in October 1994. The Gibat Ohl name was changed to Astec-Europa in the third quarter of 1995. In connection with the sale of Wibau-Astec, the Company's technology was purchased by Astec- Europa which manufactured asphalt batch plants and certain related equipment. In February 1996, the Board of Directors of the Company decided to abandon the operations of Astec- Europa to avoid continuing losses related to its operations. As a result of the Company's decision, on February 9, 1996, the management of Astec-Europa filed a request for bankruptcy in Germany. Due to the abandonment of Astec- Europa, the Company will not recover any amounts related to Astec-Europa's assets nor does it expect to be required to liquidate any of Astec-Europa's liabilities, except to the extent such liabilities were guaranteed by the Company. Total losses recognized in 1995 related to Astec-Europa, including net losses from operations and the loss on abandonment, were approximately $9,945,000 before taxes and $6,037,000 after taxes. The Company does not expect to incur any additional losses related to this subsidiary. See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company's Annual Report to Shareholders for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1995, which information is incorporated by reference under item 8 of this Report. As a result of the disposition of Wibau-Astec and the abandonment of Astec-Europa, the Company no longer conducts foreign manufacturing operations and instead has decided to concentrate all of its manufacturing activities, whether or not related to international sales, with its more efficient domestic operations. Products The Company operates in a single business segment. In 1995 it manufactured and marketed products in five principal categories: (i) hot mix asphalt plants, soil purification and environmental remediation equipment and related components; (ii) mobile construction equipment, including asphalt pavers, milling machines and material transfer vehicles and other auxiliary equipment; (iii) hot oil heaters, asphalt heaters and other heat transfer equipment; (iv) aggregates processing equipment; and (v) chain and wheel trenching and excavating equipment. The following table shows the Company's sales for each product category which accounted for 10% or more of consolidated revenue for the periods indicated. Years Ended December 31 (in thousands) 1995 1994 1993 Asphalt plants and components $110,321 $100,514 $88,116 Mobile construction equipment 29,706 30,291 22,120 Aggregate processing equipment 46,586 38,823 40,108 Trenching and excavating equipment 21,110 25,867 16,535 Financial information in connection with the Company's international sales is included in Note 1 to "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - Segment Information", appearing at Page A-11 of this report. Hot Mix Asphalt Plants Astec, Inc. designs, engineers, manufactures and markets a complete line of portable, stationary and relocatable hot mix asphalt plants and related components under the "ASTEC" trademark. An asphalt mixing plant typically consists of heating and storage equipment for liquid asphalt (manufactured by Heatec), cold feed bins for storing aggregates, a drum mixer for drying, heating and mixing, a baghouse composed of air filters and other pollution control devices, hot storage bins or silos for temporary storage of hot mix asphalt and a control house. The Company introduced the concept of plant portability in 1979. Its current generation of portable asphalt plants is marketed as the "Six Pack" and consists of six portable components which can be disassembled and moved to the construction site to reduce relocation expenses. Plant portability represents an industry innovation developed and successfully marketed by the Company. The components in the Company's asphalt mixing plants are fully automated and use microprocessor based control systems for efficient operation. The plants are manufactured to meet or exceed federal and state clean air standards. The Company has also developed specialized asphalt recycling equipment for use with its hot mix asphalt plants. Many of the existing Astec products are suited for blending, vaporizing, drying and incinerating contaminated products. As a result, Astec, Inc. has developed a line of thermal purification equipment for the remediation of petroleum contaminated soil. Mobile Construction Equipment Roadtec, Inc. designs, engineers, manufactures and markets asphalt pavers, material transfer vehicles and milling machines. Roadtec engineers emphasize simplicity, productivity, versatility and accessibility in product design and use. Asphalt Pavers. Asphalt pavers are used in the application of hot mix asphalt to the road surface. Roadtec pavers have been designed to minimize maintenance costs while exceeding road surface smoothness requirements. In 1994, Roadtec introduced several new paver models, including one which must be used with a material transfer vehicle described below. Material Transfer Vehicles. The "Shuttle Buggy" is a mobile, self- propelled material transfer vehicle which allows continuous paving by separating truck unloading from the paving process while remixing the asphalt surface material. A typical asphalt paver must stop paving to permit truck unloading of asphalt mix. By permitting continuous paving, the "Shuttle Buggy" allows the asphalt paver to produce a smoother road surface. Certain states are now requiring the use of the "Shuttle Buggy" on their jobs. Milling Machines. Roadtec milling machines are designed to remove old asphalt from the road surface before new asphalt mix is applied. They are manufactured with a simplified control system, wide conveyors, direct drives and a wide range of horsepower and cutting capabilities to provide versatility in product application. Additional models were introduced in 1994 to meet contractor needs and additional upgrades and options have been added in 1995. Heat Transfer Equipment Heatec, Inc. designs, engineers, manufactures and markets a variety of heaters and heat transfer processing equipment under the "HEATEC" trade name for use in various industries including the asphalt industry. CEI Enterprises, Inc. ("CEI") designs, engineers, manufactures and markets heating equipment and storage tanks mainly for the asphalt paving industry. CEI located in Albuquerque, New Mexico was acquired by the Company in the first quarter of 1995. Asphalt Heating Equipment. Heatec manufactures a complete line of heating and liquid storage equipment for the asphalt paving industry. Heaters are offered in both direct-fired and helical coil models while CEI's heating equipment is hot oil, direct fired or electric. The equipment includes portable and stationary tank models with capacities up to 35,000 gallons each. Industrial Heating Equipment. Heatec builds a wide variety of industrial heaters to fit a broad range of applications, including equipment for emulsion plants, roofing material plants, refineries, chemical processing, rubber plants and the agribusiness. Heatec has the technical staff to custom design heating systems and has systems operating as large as 40,000,000 BTU's per hour. Aggregates Processing Equipment Founded in 1906, Telsmith, Inc. designs, engineers, manufactures and markets a wide range of portable and stationary equipment for the production and classification of sand, gravel, and quarried stone and recycled concrete and asphalt for road and other construction applications worldwide. Telsmith's products include jaw, cone and impact crushers; several types of feeders which transport virgin, recycled, or crushed material to primary, secondary, or tertiary crushing equipment; vibrating screens to separate the aggregate into various mixes; and washing and conveying equipment. Telsmith markets its products individually and as complete systems, incorporating microprocessor based automated controls for the efficient operation of its equipment. Trenching and Excavating Equipment Trencor, Inc. designs, engineers, manufactures and markets chain and wheel trenching equipment, canal excavators, rock saws, road miners and log loading equipment. In August 1994, Trencor acquired the product line and related manufacturing rights, trademarks, patents, intellectual property and engineering designs of Capitol Trencher Corporation ("CTC"), also a manufacturer of trenching and excavation equipment. This purchase excluded the manufacturing plant and equipment operated by CTC. The fabrication of the CTC product line has been relocated to Trencor's new facility in Grapevine, Texas. Chain Trenchers. Trencor chain trenching machines utilize a heavy duty chain (equipped with cutting teeth attached to steel plates) wrapped around a long moveable boom. These machines, with weights up to 400,000 pounds, are capable of cutting a trench up to eight feet wide and thirty feet deep through rock. Trencor also makes foundation trenchers used in areas where drilling and blasting are prohibited. Wheel Trenchers. Trencor wheel trenching machines are used in pipeline excavation in soil and soft rock. The wheel trenchers weigh up to 390,000 pounds and have a trench capacity of up to seven feet in width and ten feet in depth. Canal Excavator. Trencor canal excavators are used to make finished and trimmed trapezoidal canal excavations within close tolerances. The canals are primarily used for irrigation systems. Rock Saws. Trencor manufactures a rock saw which is utilized for laying water and gas lines, fiber optics cable, constructing highway drainage systems and for other applications. Roadminers. Trencor manufactures four "Road Miner" models weighing up to 400,000 pounds with an attachment which allows it to cut a path up to twelve and a half feet wide and five feet deep on a single pass. The Roadminer has applications in the road construction industry and in mining and aggregates processing operations. Log Loaders. Trencor also manufactures several different models of log loaders. Its products include mobile/truck mounted models, as well as track mounted and stationary models, each of which is used in harvesting and processing wood products. The equipment is sold under the Log-Hog name. Manufacturing The Company manufactures many of the component parts and related equipment for its products. In many cases, the Company designs, engineers and manufactures custom component parts and equipment to meet the particular needs of individual customers. Manufacturing operations during 1995 took place at seven separate locations. The Company's manufacturing operations consist primarily of fabricating steel components and the assembly and testing of its products to ensure quality control standards have been achieved. Marketing The Company markets its products both domestically and internationally. The principal purchasers of the Company's products include highway and heavy equipment contractors, utility contractors, pipeline contractors, open mine operators, quarry operators and foreign and domestic governmental agencies. Astec, Inc. sells directly to its customers with domestic, soil remediation and international sales departments. Astec, Inc. also has a branch in Chino, California to service customers in the western United States. Telsmith products are sold through two leased branch locations in San Francisco, California and Sharon, Massachusetts, as well as through a combination of direct sales, both domestic and international, and dealer sales. Heatec, CEI, Roadtec and Trencor products are marketed through a combination of direct sales and dealer sales. Approximately 18 manufacturers' representatives sell Heatec products for applications in industries other than the asphalt industry with such sales comprising approximately 30% of Heatec's sales volume during 1995. Direct sales employees are paid salaries and are generally entitled to commissions after obtaining certain sales quotas. See "Business - Properties" The Company's international sales efforts are decentralized with each subsidiary maintaining responsibility for its own international marketing efforts. Seminars and Technical Bulletins The Company periodically conducts technical and service seminars which are primarily for contractors, employees and owners of asphalt mixing plants. In 1995, approximately 290 representatives of contractors and owners of hot mix asphalt plants attended seminars held by the Company in Chattanooga, Tennessee. These seminars, which are taught by Company management and employees, cover a range of subjects including technological innovations in the hot mix asphalt business and other industry segments in which the Company manufactures products. In addition to the seminars, the Company published a number of detailed technical bulletins covering various technological and business issues relating to the asphalt industry. Patents and Trademarks The Company seeks to obtain patents to protect the novel features of its products. The Company and its subsidiaries hold 77 United States patents and 62 foreign patents. There are 16 United States and 16 foreign patent applications pending. The Company and its subsidiaries have approximately 40 trademarks registered in the United States, including logos for Astec, Telsmith, Roadtec and Trencor, and the names ASTEC, TELSMITH, HEATEC, LOG HOG, ROADTEC and TRENCOR. Many of these trademarks are also registered in foreign countries, including Canada, Great Britain, Mexico, Australia and Japan. The Company and its subsidiaries also license their technology to manufacturers. Engineering and Product Development The Company dedicates substantial resources to its engineering and product development. At December 31, 1995, the Company and its subsidiaries had 122 individuals employed domestically full-time in engineering and design capacities. Raw Materials Raw materials used by the Company in the manufacture of its products include carbon steel and various types of alloy steel which are normally purchased from steel mills and other sources. Seasonality and Backlog The Company's business is somewhat seasonal. The Company's sales tend to be stronger from January through June each year which is attributable largely to orders placed in the fourth quarter in anticipation of warmer summer months when most asphalt paving is done. As of December 31, 1995, the Company had a backlog for delivery of products at certain dates in the future of approximately $34,751,000 At December 31, 1994 the total backlog was approximately $50,465,000, excluding Wibau-Astec and Astec-Europa. The Company's backlog is subject to some seasonality as noted above. The Company's contracts reflected in the backlog are not, by their terms, subject to termination. Management believes that the Company is in substantial compliance with all manufacturing and delivery timetables relating to its products. Competition The Company faces strong competition in price, service and product performance in each product category. While the Company does not compete with any one manufacturer in all of its product lines, it competes as to certain products with both large publicly held companies with resources significantly greater than those of the Company and various smaller manufacturers. Hot mix asphalt plant competitors include CMI Corporation; Cedarapids, Inc., a division of Raytheon Company; and Gencor Industries, Inc. Paving equipment competitors include Caterpillar Paving Products Inc. (including the Company's former Barber-Greene product line), a subsidiary of Caterpillar Inc.; Blaw- Knox Construction Equipment Company, a subsidiary of Clark Equipment Co.; Ingersoll-Rand Company; and Cedarapids, Inc. The market for the Company's heat transfer equipment is diverse because of the multiple applications for such equipment. Its principal competitor is Gencor/Hyway Heat Systems. The Company's milling machine equipment competitors include Ingersoll-Rand Company; CMI Corporation; Cedarapids, Inc.; Caterpillar; and Wirtgen America, Inc. Aggregates processing equipment competitors include the Pioneer Division of Portec, Inc.; Nordberg, Inc.; Eagle Iron Works; Boliden Allis, a member of the Trelleborg Group; Cedarapids, Inc.; and other smaller manufacturers, both domestic and foreign. Competition for sales of trenching and excavating equipment includes Ditch Witch; J.I. Case; Vermeer and other smaller manufacturers in the small utility trencher market. As a whole, imports do not constitute significant competition in the United States; however, in international sales, the Company generally competes with foreign manufacturers which may have a local presence in the market the Company is attempting to penetrate. Asphalt and concrete are generally considered competitive products as a surface choice for new roads and highways. A portion of the interstate highway system is paved in concrete, but a majority of all surfaced roads in the United States are paved with asphalt. Although concrete is used for some new road surfaces, asphalt is used for virtually all resurfacing, even the resurfacing of most concrete roads. Management does not believe that concrete, as a competitive surface choice, materially impacts the Company's business prospects. Regulation The Company does not operate within a highly regulated industry. However, air pollution equipment manufactured by the Company principally for hot mix asphalt plants must comply with certain performance standards promulgated by the federal Environmental Protection Agency under the Clean Air Act applicable to "new sources" or new plants. Management believes that the Company's products meet all material requirements of such regulations and of applicable state pollution standards and environmental protection laws. In addition, due to the size and weight of certain equipment, the Company and its customers sometimes confront conflicting state regulations on maximum weights transportable on highways and roads. This problem occurs most frequently in the movement of portable asphalt mixing plants. Also, some states have regulations governing the operation of asphalt mixing plants and most states have regulations relating to the accuracy of weights and measures which affect some of the control systems manufactured by the Company. Employees On August 3, 1995, a union election was held at the Trencor plant in which a unit of Trencor production and maintenance employees voted to be represented by The United States Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO, CLC. Due to alleged improper activity and interference, Trencor has asserted that the election was illegal and has requested a new election. The proceeding is currently pending before the National Labor Relations Board. At December 31, 1995, the Company and its subsidiaries employed 1,402 persons, of which 1,048 were engaged in manufacturing operations, 122 in engineering and design functions and 232 in selling, administrative and management functions. Telsmith has a labor agreement expiring on October 14, 1998. Except as set forth above, none of the Company's other employees are covered by a collective bargaining agreement. Notwithstanding the current preceding before the National Labor Relations Board, the Company considers its employee relations to be good. Item 2. Properties The location, approximate square footage, acreage occupied and principal function of the properties owned or leased by the Company are set forth below: <TABLE> Approximate Approximate Principal Location Square Footage Acreage Function <CAPTION> <S> <C> <C> <C> <S> Chattanooga, Tennessee 361,000 56.6 Corporate and subsidiary offices, manufacturing - Astec Chattanooga, Tennessee 0 63.0 Storage yard - Astec Chattanooga, Tennessee 66,200 5.0 Offices, manufacturing - Heatec Chattanooga, Tennessee 125,000 13.6 Offices, manufacturing - Roadtec North Aurora, Illinois 16,700 3.5 Roadtec (sales and service office) San Francisco, California 5,000 1.0 Leased sales and service office and warehouse - Telsmith St. Charles, Illinois 300 0 Leased international sales office - Telsmith Chino, California 4,762 1.0 Leased parts warehouse - Astec Rossville, Georgia 40,500 2.6 Manufacturing and sales office facility - Astec Grapevine, Texas 175,000 51.67 Offices, manufacturing - Trencor Grand Prairie, Texas 83,000 6.1 Former offices, manufacturing - Trencor, Inc.(property for sale) Sharon, Massachusetts 4,000 1.0 Leased sales and service office - Telsmith Odessa, Texas 4,072 .8 Sales office and parts warehouse - Trencor, Inc. Inman, South Carolina 13,600 8.0 Leased with option to buy (office and warehouse of former Soil Purification of Carolina, Inc.) Houston, Texas 120 0 Leased sales office - Heatec Albuquerque, New Mexico 28,592 9.0 Leased - offices and plant - CEI Albuquerque, New Mexico 111,908 14.0 New plant and offices- CEI </TABLE> In 1995 significant office and plant improvements were made at Roadtec and Astec, Inc. Management believes that each of the Company's facilities provide office or manufacturing space suitable for its current needs and considers the terms under which it leases facilities to be reasonable. Item 3. Legal Proceedings The Company's subsidiary, Telsmith, was a defendant in a patent infringement action brought by Nordberg, Inc., a manufacturer of a competing line of rock crushing equipment, seeking monetary damages and an injunction to cease an alleged infringement of a patent on certain components used in the production of its rock crushing equipment. On March 30, 1995, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin issued a ruling in favor of the Company and entered a declaratory judgment in favor of Telsmith, and against Plaintiff Nordberg, Inc. declaring that claims 8 through 11 and 13 of Nordberg's United States patent No. 4,478,373, entitled "Conical Crusher" are invalid. The Court also entered judgment in favor of Telsmith, Inc. and against Nordberg, Inc. dismissing Nordberg's claim of infringement against Telsmith. The Company was pleased with the Court's decision, but has filed an appeal asking the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit to overturn the trial court's decision not to award Telsmith its attorney's fees in the case. Nordberg did not cross-appeal to the Federal Circuit on the Telsmith judgment. The time for doing so has now expired. The judgment has therefore become "final" as to those issues not raised by Telsmith on appeal. On October 28, 1993, the Company was also named as a defendant in a patent infringement action brought by Gencor, Inc., a manufacturer of a competing line of asphalt plants, seeking monetary damages and an injunction to cease an alleged infringement of a patent on certain components used in the production of its asphalt plant product line. This case was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Orlando Division, and went to trial on January 22, 1996. On February 3, 1996, the jury returned a verdict in the Company's favor holding that Astec's Double Barrel drum mixer does not infringe the Gencor patent in question. Judgment on that jury verdict was entered by the Court on February 5, 1996. It is anticipated that Gencor will appeal. Management believes that Gencor's anticipated appeal is without merit. During 1994, the United States Supreme Court refused to hear CMI Corporation's petition to overturn the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit's reversal of patent damages awarded to CMI Corporation and Robert L. Mendenhall by a lower court. As a result of the Supreme Court's refusal to grant certiorari, in 1994 the Company received $12,917,000 which was being held in escrow pending the Company's appeal of the two judgments. In addition, on December 31, 1994, the Company received $1,309,000 from CMI in satisfaction of the judgment entered in favor of the Company on its counterclaim against CMI. The receipt of these funds effectively concluded the litigation between the Company and CMI and Robert L. Mendenhall which had been pending for a number of years. As a result, in 1994 the Company reversed its accrued liability for patent damages. The reversal of $13,870,000 in accrued patent damages and the receipt of $1,309,000 in patent damages from CMI total $15,179,000 and are included in the Consolidated Statements of Income as Patent suit damages and expenses (net recoveries and accrual adjustments). Management has reviewed all claims and lawsuits and, upon the advice of counsel, has made provision for any estimable losses; however, the Company is unable to predict the ultimate outcome of the outstanding claims and lawsuits. Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders None. Executive Officers of the Registrant The name, title, ages and business experience of the executive officers of the Company are listed below. J. Don Brock has been President and a director of Astec since its incorporation in 1972 and assumed the additional position of Chairman of the Board in 1975. He was the Treasurer of the Company from 1972 until 1994. From 1969 to 1972, Dr. Brock was President of the Asphalt Division of CMI Corporation. Dr. Brock earned his Ph.D. degree in mechanical engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology. Dr. Brock and Thomas R. Campbell, President of Roadtec, are first cousins. Dr. Brock is 57. Albert E. Guth has been Chief Financial Officer of the Company since 1987, Senior Vice President since 1984, Secretary of the Company since 1972 and Treasurer since 1994. Mr. Guth, who has been a director since 1972, was the Vice President of the Company from 1972 until 1984. From 1969 to 1972, Mr. Guth was the Controller of the Asphalt Division of CMI Corporation. He is 56. F. McKamy Hall, a Certified Public Accountant, has served as Controller of the Company since May 1987. From 1985 to 1987, Mr. Hall was Vice President-Finance of Quadel Management Corporation, a company engaged in real estate management. He is 53. Thomas R. Campbell has served as President of Roadtec, Inc. since 1988. From 1981 to 1988 he served as Operations Manager of Roadtec. Mr. Campbell and J. Don Brock, President of the Company, are first cousins. Mr. Campbell is 46. W. Norman Smith has served as the President of Astec, Inc. since December 1, 1994. He formerly served as President of Heatec, Inc. from 1977 to 1994. From 1972 to 1977, Mr. Smith was a Regional Sales Manager with the Company. From 1969 to 1972, Mr. Smith was an engineer with the Asphalt Division of CMI Corporation. Mr. Smith has also served as a director of the Company since 1972. He is 56. Jerry F. Gilbert has served as President of Trencor, Inc. since 1981 and as a director of the Company since May, 1991. He is 50. Robert G. Stafford has served as President of Telsmith, Inc., formerly the Barber-Greene Company, since April 1991. Between January 1987 and January 1991, Mr. Stafford served as President of Telsmith, Inc., a subsidiary of Barber-Greene. From 1984 until the Company's acquisition of Barber- Greene in December 1986, Mr. Stafford was Vice President - Operations of Barber-Greene and General Manager of Telsmith. From 1979 to 1984 he served as Director-Engineering and Operations for Telsmith. He became a director of the Company in March 1988. He is 57. James G. May has served as President of Heatec, Inc. since December 1, 1994. From 1984 until 1994 he served as Vice President of Engineering of Astec, Inc. He is 51. M. Brent England has served as president of CEI Enterprises, Inc. since March 1995. Previously, Mr. England served as president of Trace Industries, Inc. d/b/a CEI Enterprises, since April 1992. Prior to joining CEI, Mr. England served as a trustee for the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for three years. Mr. England has also served as general manager of N.C. Ribble Company, a large construction equipment distributor, in Albuquerque, New Mexico. He is 63. PART II Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Shareholder Matters The Company's Common Stock is traded in the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotation System (NASDAQ) National Market under the symbol "ASTE". The Company has never paid any dividends on its Common Stock. The high and low sales prices of the Company's Common Stock as reported on the NASDAQ National Market for each quarter during the last two fiscal years, were as follows: Price Per Share 1995 High Low 1st Quarter 14 1/4 11 2nd Quarter 13 1/8 10 7/8 3rd Quarter 11 3/4 9 7/8 4th Quarter 12 1/4 9 3/4 Price Per Share 1994 High Low 1st Quarter 20 1/8 13 1/2 2nd Quarter 17 5/8 13 3rd Quarter 15 12 1/2 4th Quarter 15 7/8 11 5/8 The number of holders of record of the Company's Common Stock as of March 11, 1996, was 748. Item 6. Selected Financial Data Selected financial data appear on page A-1 of this Report. Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations appears on pages A-2 to A-5 of this Report. Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data Financial statements and supplementary financial information appear on pages A-6 to A-23 of this Report. Item 9. Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure None required to be reported in this item. PART III Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant Information regarding the Company's directors included under the caption "Election of Directors - Certain Information Concerning Nominees and Directors" in the Company's definitive Proxy Statement to be delivered to the shareholders of the Company in connection with the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on April 25, 1996 is incorporated herein by reference. Required information regarding the Company's executive officers is contained in Part I of this Report under the heading "Executive Officers of the Registrant". Information regarding compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act is included under "Election of Directors - Section 16(a) Filing Requirements" in the Company's definitive Proxy Statement which is incorporated herein by reference. Item 11. Executive Compensation Information included under the caption, "Election of Directors - Executive Compensation" in the Company's definitive Proxy Statement to be delivered to the shareholders of the Company in connection with the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on April 25, 1996 is incorporated herein by reference. Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management Information included under the captions "Election of Directors - Certain Information Concerning Nominees and Directors", "Election of Directors - Common Stock Ownership of Management" and "Election of Directors - Common Stock Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners" in the Company's definitive Proxy Statement to be delivered to the shareholders of the Company in connection with the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on April 25, 1996 is incorporated herein by reference. Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions On March 20, 1995, the Company acquired all of the issued and outstanding shares of Trace Industries, Inc., a New Mexico corporation doing business as CEI Enterprises ("CEI"), in exchange for $852,004 in cash and 87,333 shares of Company Common Stock. The deemed effective date of this transaction for financial reporting purposes was February 28, 1995. The purchase price was determined by the Senior Vice President of the Company based on his opinion of the fair market value of CEI following arm's length negotiation. Prior to this acquisition, CEI was a closely held company with four shareholders including Mr. Brent England, its President. In connection with this transaction, CEI was merged into a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company with Mr. England continuing to serve as President of the successor corporation and, as such, is now an executive officer of the Company. In lieu of providing registration rights to the former shareholders of CEI with respect to the shares of Company Common Stock being issued in this transaction, the Company granted each such shareholder the right to require the Company to redeem the shares at any time within two years of the closing date at a price of $12.00 per share. Mr. England received 23,333 shares of Company Common Stock in connection with this transaction and, consistent with the rights granted to each other former shareholder of CEI, has the right to require the redemption of such shares by the Company for $12.00 per share at any time on or before March 20, 1997. PART IV Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K (a)(1) The following financial statements and other information appear in Appendix "A" to this Report and are filed as a part hereof: . Selected Consolidated Financial Data. . Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. . Report of Independent Auditors. . Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 1995 and 1994. . Consolidated Statements of Income for the Years Ended December 31, 1995, 1994 and 1993. . Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 1995, 1994 and 1993. . Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 1995, 1994 and 1993. . Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. (a)(2) Other than as described below, Financial Statement Schedules are not filed with this Report because the Schedules are either inapplicable or the required information is presented in the Financial Statements or Notes thereto. The following Schedules appear in Appendix "A" to this Report and are filed as a part hereof: . Report of Independent Auditors. . Schedule VIII - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts. (a)(3) The following Exhibits* are incorporated by reference into or are filed with this Report: 2.2 Share Purchase and Transfer Agreement by and between the Company and Gibat Ohl Ingenieurgesellschaft fur Anlagentechnik mbH, dated as of October 5, 1994 (incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K dated November 7, 1994, File No. 0-14714). 3.1 Restated Charter of the Company (incorporated by reference to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1, effective June 18, 1986, File No. 33-5348). 3.2 Articles of Amendment to the Restated Charter of the Company, effective September 12, 1988 (incorporated by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1988, File No. 0-14714). 3.3 Articles of Amendment to the Restated Charter of the Company, effective June 8, 1989 (incorporated by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1989, File No. 0-14714). 3.4 Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company, adopted March 14, 1990 (incorporated by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1989, File No. 0-14714). 4.1 Trust Indenture between City of Mequon and Firstar Trust Company, as Trustee, dated as of February 1, 1994 (incorporated by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1993, File No. 0-14714). 4.2 Indenture of Trust, dated April 1, 1994, by and between Grapevine Industrial Development Corporation and Bank One, Texas, NA, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1993, File No. 0-14714). 4.3 Shareholder Protection Rights Agreement, dated December 22, 1995 (incorporated by reference to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 22, 1995, File No. 0-14714). 10.29 Lease Agreement, dated as of August 28, 1989, between Telsmith, Inc., and Pine Hill Developers (incorporated by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1989, File No. 0-14714). 10.57 License Agreement, dated July 2, 1992, between Telsmith, Inc. and Gerlach Industries (incorporated by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1992, File No. 0-14714). 10.75 Loan Agreement between City of Mequon, Wisconsin and Telsmith, Inc. dated as of February 1, 1994 (incorporated by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1993, File No. 0-14714). *The Exhibits are numbered in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K. Inapplicable Exhibits are not included in the list. 10.76 Credit Agreement by and between Telsmith, Inc. and M&I Marshall & Ilsley Bank, dated as of February 1, 1994 (incorporated by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1993, File No. 0-14714). 10.77 Security Agreement by and between Telsmith, Inc. and M&I Marshall & Ilsley Bank, dated as of February 1, 1994 (incorporated by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1993, File No. 0-14714). 10.78 Mortgage and Security Agreement and Fixture Financing Statement by and between Telsmith, Inc. and M&I Marshall & Ilsley Bank, dated as of February 1, 1994 (incorporated by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1993, File No. 0-14714). 10.79 Guarantee of Astec Industries, Inc. in favor of M&I Ilsley Bank, dated as of February 1, 1994 (incorporated by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1993, File No. 0-14714). 10.80 Guarantee of Wibau-Astec Maschinenfabrik GmbH in favor of Dresdner Bank Aktiengensellschaft, dated as of December 22, 1993 (incorporated by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994, File No. 0-14714). 10.81 Letter of Guarantee of Wibau-Astec Maschinenfabrik GmbH in favor of Berliner Hondels - und Frankfurter Bank, dated as of December 22, 1993 (incorporated by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994, File No. 0-14714). 10.82 Guarantee of Wibau-Astec Maschinenfabrik GmbH in favor of Bayerische Vereinsbank, dated as of December 22, 1993 (incorporated by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994, File No. 0-14714). 10.83 Loan Agreement dated as of April 1, 1994, between Grapevine Industrial Development Corporation and Trencor, Inc. (incorporated by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994, File No. 0-14714). 10.84 Letter of Credit Agreement, dated April 1, 1994, between The First National Bank of Chicago and Trencor, Inc. (incorporated by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994, File No. 0-14714). 10.85 Guaranty Agreement, dated April 1, 1994, between Astec Industries, Inc. and Bank One, Texas, NA, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994, File No. 0-14714). 10.86 Astec Guaranty, dated April 29, 1994, of debt of Trencor, Inc. in favor of The First National Bank of Chicago (incorporated by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994, File No. 0-14714). 10.87 Credit Agreement, dated as of July 20, 1994, between the Company and The First National Bank of Chicago (incorporated by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994, File No. 0- 14714). 10.88 Guarantee of Wibau-Astec Maschinenfabrik GmbH in favor of Bayerische Vereinsbank, dated as of January 16, 1995 (incorporated by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994, File No. 0-14714). 10.89 Waiver for December 31, 1994, dated February 24, 1995 with respect to the First National Bank of Chicago Credit Agreement dated July 20, 1994 (incorporated by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994, File No. 0-14714). 10.90 First Amendment to Guaranty of Payment, dated March 21, 1995 by and between Heatec, Inc.; Roadtec, Inc.; Trencor, Inc.; Telsmith, Inc.; Astec Transportation, Inc.; ACI, Inc.; Astec, Inc.; CEI Enterprises, Inc.; and The First National Bank of Chicago. 10.91 First Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated May 22, 1995 between the Company and The First National Bank of Chicago. 10.92 Second Amendment to Guaranty of Payment, dated May 22, 1995 by and between Heatec, Inc.; Roadtec, Inc.; Trencor, Inc.; Telsmith, Inc.; Astec Transportation, Inc.; ACI, Inc.; Astec, Inc.; CEI Enterprises, Inc.; and The First National Bank of Chicago. 10.93 Guaranty of all obligations of Astec-Europa Strassenbaumaschinen GmbH executed by the Company in favor of Bayerische Vereinsbank Aktiengesellschaft, dated December 6, 1995. 10.94 Guaranty of a DM3,000,000 credit facility to Gibat Ohl Ingenieurgesellschaft fur Anlagentechnik mbH executed by the Company in favor of Deutsche Bank AG, dated December 13, 1995. 10.95 Waiver for December 31, 1995, dated November 10, 1995 with respect to The First National Bank of Chicago Credit Agreement dated July 20, 1994, as amended. 10.96 English translation of Application for Commencement of Bankruptcy Proceedings filed on behalf of Astec-Europa Strassenbaumaschinen in Gelnhausen, Germany on February 9, 1996. 10.97 Limited Consent of The First National Bank of Chicago dated as of March 21, 1995 related to the acquisition of Trace Industries, Inc. and the assignment of certain assets to Astec, Inc. Executive Compensation Plans and Arrangements 10.98 Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, dated February 1, 1996 to be effective as of January 1, 1995. 10.99 Trust under Astec Industries, Inc. Supplemental Retirement Plan, dated January 1, 1996. 11 Statement Regarding Computation of Per Share Earnings. 22 Subsidiaries of the Registrant. 23 Consent of Independent Auditors (b) No reports on Form 8-K were filed in the fourth quarter. (c) The Exhibits to this Report are listed under Item 14(a)(3) above. (d) The Financial Statement Schedules to this Report are listed under Item 14(a)(2) above. APPENDIX "A" to ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K ITEMS 8 and 14(a)(1) and (2), (c) and (d) INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES ASTEC INDUSTRIES, INC. Contents Page Selected Consolidated Financial Data Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 1995 and 1994 Consolidated Statements of Income for the Years Ended December 31, 1995, 1994 and 1993 Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 1995, 1994 and 1993 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 1995, 1994 and 1993 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Report of Independent Auditors Schedule VIII - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS The Board of Directors and Shareholders Astec Industries, Inc. We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Astec Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1995. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 14(a). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Astec Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries at December 31, 1995 and 1994, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1995, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein. As discussed in Note 1, in 1995 the Company changed its method of accounting for the impairment of long-lived assets and for long-lived assets to be disposed of. /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP Chattanooga, Tennessee February 27, 1996 ASTEC INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES SCHEDULE (VIII) VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS FOR CONTINUING OPERATIONS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995, 1994 AND 1993 <TABLE> ADDITIONS CHARGES TO BEGINNING COSTS & OTHER <CAPTION> ENDING <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> DESCRIPTION BALANCE EXPENSES ADDITIONS DEDUCTIONS BALANCE December 31, 1995: Reserves deducted from assets to which they apply: Allowance for doubtful accounts $ 1,684,242 $ 533,136 $ 20,000 (3) $ 958,740 (1) $ 1,278,638 Reserve for inventory $ 4,994,035 $ 1,196,876 $ 0 $ 752,401 $ 5,438,510 Other Reserves: Product warranty$ 3,470,703 $ 3,194,240 $ 0 $ 4,194,168 (2) $ 2,470,775 December 31, 1994: Reserves deducted from assets to which they apply: Allowance for doubtful accounts $ 1,191,083 $ 362,089 $ 467,607 (3) $ 336,537 (1) $ 1,684,242 Reserve for inventory $6,494,533 $ 3,621,218 $ 0 $ 5,121,716 $ 4,994,035 Other Reserves: Product warranty $ 1,781,733 $ 2,616,565 $ 0 $ 927,595 (2) $ 3,470,703 Reserve for patent damages $ 13,250,048 $ 620,290 $ 0 $ 13,870,338 $ 0 December 31, 1993: Reserves deducted from assets to which they apply: Allowance for doubtful accounts $1,060,588 $742,752 $ 21,609 $ 633,866 (1) $ 1,191,083 Reserve for inventory $ 5,948,084 $ 2,952,918 $ 0 $ 2,406,469 $ 6,494,533 Other Reserves: Product warranty$1,551,850 $ 2,689,441 $ 0 $ 2,459,558 (2) $ 1,781,733 Reserve for patent damages $ 12,554,640 $ 695,408 $ 0 $ 0 $ 13,250,048 </TABLE> [FN] (1) Uncollectible accounts written off, net of recoveries. (2) Warranty costs charged to the reserve. (3) Represents reserve balances of subsidiaries acquired in the year. SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Astec Industries, Inc. has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. ASTEC INDUSTRIES, INC. BY: /s/ J. Don Brock J. Don Brock, Chairman of the Board and President (Principal Executive Officer) BY: /s/ Albert E. Guth Albert E. Guth, Senior Vice President Secretary and Treasurer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) Date: March 1, 1996 Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by a majority of the Board of Directors of the Registrant on the dates indicated: SIGNATURE TITLE DATE /s/ J. Don Brock Chairman of the Board March 1, 1996 J. Don Brock and President /s/ Albert E. Guth Senior Vice President, March 1, 1996 Albert E. Guth Secretary, Treasurer and Director /s/ W. Norman Smith President - Astec, Inc. March 1, 1996 W. Norman Smith and Director /s/ Robert G. Stafford President - Telsmith, Inc. March 1, 1996 Robert G. Stafford and Director /s/ Jerry F. Gilbert President - Trencor, Inc. March 1, 1996 Jerry F. Gilbert and Director SIGNATURE TITLE DATE /s/ E.D. Sloan Jr. Director March 1, 1996 E.D. Sloan, Jr. /s/ William B. Sansom Director March 1, 1996 William B. Sansom /s/ Joseph Martin, Jr. Director March 1, 1996 Joseph Martin, Jr. /s/ George C. Dillon Director March 1, 1996 George C. Dillon /s/ G.W. Jones Director March 1, 1996 G.W. Jones /s/ Daniel K. Frierson Director March 1, 1996 Daniel K. Frierson Commission File No. 0-14714 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 EXHIBITS FILED WITH ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995 ASTEC INDUSTRIES, INC. 4101 Jerome Avenue Chattanooga, Tennessee 37407 ASTEC INDUSTRIES, INC. FORM 10-K INDEX TO EXHIBITS Sequentially Exhibit Number Description Numbered Page Exhibit 10.90 First Amendment to Guaranty of Payment, dated March 21, 1995 by and between Heatec, Inc.; Roadtec, Inc.; Trencor, Inc.; Telsmith, Inc.; Astec Transportation, Inc.; ACI, Inc.; Astec, Inc.; CEI Enterprises, Inc.; and The First National Bank of Chicago. Exhibit 10.91 First Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated May 22, 1995 between the Company and The First Nationa Exhibit 10.92 Second Amendment to Guaranty of Payment, dated May 22, 1995 by and between Heatec, Inc.; Roadtec, Inc.; Trencor, Inc.; Telsmith, Inc.; Astec Transportation, Inc.; ACI, Inc.; Astec, Inc.; CEI Enterprises, Inc.; and The First National Bank of Chicago. Exhibit 10.93 Guaranty of all obligations of Astec-Europa Strassenbaumaschinen GmbH executed by the Company in favor of Bayerische Vereinsbank Aktiengesellschaft, dated December 6, 1995. Exhibit 10.94 Guaranty of a DM3,000,000 credit facility to Gibat Ohl Ingenieurgesellschaft fur Anlagentechnik mbH executed by the Company in favor of Deutsche Bank AG, dated December 13, 1995. Exhibit 10.95 Waiver for December 31, 1995, dated November 10, 1995 with respect to The First National Bank of Chicago Credit Agreement dated July 20, 1994, as amended. Exhibit 10.96 English translation of Application for Commencement of Bankruptcy Proceedings filed on behalf of Astec-Europa Strassenbaumaschinen in Gelnhausen, Germany on February 9, 1996. Exhibit 10.97 Limited Consent of The First National Bank of Chicago dated as of March 21, 1995 related to the acquisition of Trace Industries, Inc. and the assignment of certain assets to Astec, Inc. Executive Compensation Plans and Arrangements Exhibit 10.98 Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, dated February 1, 1996 to be effective as of January 1, 1995. Exhibit 10.99 Trust under Astec Industries, Inc. Supplemental Retirement Plan, dated January 1, 1996. Exhibit 11 Statement Regarding Computation of Per Share Earnings. Exhibit 22 Subsidiaries of the Registrant. Exhibit 23 Consent of Independent Auditors. For a list of certain Exhibits not filed with this Report that are incorporated by reference into this Report, see Item 14(a)(3).
EXHIBIT 11 Statement Regarding Computation of Per Share Earnings
ASTEC INDUSTRIES, INC. EXHIBIT (11) - COMPUTATIONS OF EARNINGS PER SHARE 12/31/95 (In Thousands) Shares for Earnings Per Share Computations Primary: Weighted average outstanding during year 10,072 Common Stock equivalent for stock options & warrants 124 TOTAL 10,196 Fully Diluted: Weighted average outstanding during year 10,072 Common Stock equivalent for stock options & warrants 125 TOTAL 10,197 Earnings Applicable to Common Stock: Income from continuing operations $ 4,560 Net Income $ 4,560 Earnings Per Common Share (Based on Weighted Average Number of Common and Uncommon Equivalent Shares Outstanding): Income from continuing operations $ .45 Net Income $ .45 Additional Computations of EPS: Fully Diluted: Income from continuing operations $ .45 Net Income $ .45
EXHIBIT 22 Subsidiaries of the Registrant LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES Jurisdiction of Name Owned Incorporation Astec, Inc. 100 Tennessee Astec Transportation, Inc. 100 Tennessee CEI Enterprises, Inc. 100 Tennessee Heatec, Inc. 100 Tennessee Roadtec, Inc. 100 Tennessee Telsmith, Inc. 100 Delaware Trencor, Inc. 100 Texas
Exhibit 23 Consent of Independent Auditors
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 33-14738 and 0-14714) pertaining to the Astec Industries, Inc. 1986 and 1992 Stock Option Plans of our report dated February 27, 1996, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Astec Industries, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1995. /s/ERNST & YOUNG LLP Chattanooga, Tennessee March 15, 1996
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA (in thousands, except as noted*) Consolidated Income Statement Data <TABLE> 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 <CAPTION> <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> Net sales $242,601 $ 213,806 $ 172,801 $ 149,133 $134,512 Selling, general and administrative expenses 34,326 31,142 28,624 23,969 20,456 Patent suit damages and expenses (net recoveries and accrual adjustments) 699 (14,947) 375 567 3,868 Research and development 5,128 3,166 2,923 2,580 2,503 Loss on abandonment of foreign subsidiary 7,037 Interest expense 2,125 713 1,788 3,241 4,597 Income from continuing operations 4,560 23,436 9,338 6,014 524 Discontinued operations 3,530 Net income 4,560 23,436 9,338 6,014 4,054 Income per common share from continuing operations*(1) .45 2.38 1.07 .82 .07 Consolidated Balance Sheet Data <CAPTION> Working capital $ 58,015 $ 53,000 $ 40,767 $ 33,641 $ 31,167 Total assets 154,356 155,964 102,967 87,885 90,989 Total short-term debt 774 8,573 10 3,103 4,862 Long-term debt, less current maturities 17,150 16,155 0 22,660 29,387 Shareholders' equity 95,901 90,373 64,105 27,631 21,279 Book value per common share at year-end*(1) 9.50 9.04 6.54 3.78 2.95 </TABLE> Quarterly Financial Highlight (Unaudited) First Second Third Fourth Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter 1995 Net sales $ 57,544 $ 70,368 $ 65,015 $ 49,674 Gross profit 13,637 14,011 13,298 8,811 Net income 2,516 4,730 2,768 (5,454) Net income per common share* .25 .47 .27 (.54) 1994 Net sales $ 46,226 $ 62,694 $ 49,021 $ 55,865 Gross profit 11,029 14,013 11,216 11,839 Net income 2,876 5,212 3,131 12,217 Net income per common share* .29 .53 .32 1.23 Common Stock Price* 1995 High 14-1/4 13-1/8 11-3/4 12-1/4 1995 Low 11 10-7/8 9-7/8 9-3/4 1994 High 20-1/8 17-5/8 15 15-7/8 1994 Low 13-1/2 13 12-1/2 11-5/8 The Company's common stock is traded on the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotation (NASDAQ) National Market under the symbol ASTE. Prices shown are the high and low bid prices as announced by NASDAQ. The Company has never paid any dividends on its common stock. The number of shareholders of record is approximately 750. (1) Restated to retroactively reflect the two-for-one stock split effected in the form of a dividend on August 12, 1993.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Results of Operations 1995 vs. 1994 Net income for 1995 was $4,560,000 or $.45 per share compared to net income of $23,436,000 or $2.38 per share in 1994. Net income for 1994 included $14,947,000 in non-recurring gains as a result of final judgments entered in connection with the CMI litigation. The decline in 1995 also reflects a $7,037,000 loss resulting from the abandonment of Astec-Europa, as well as continuing losses from foreign operations during 1995. Income before income taxes was $6,141,000 in 1995 compared to $25,737,000 in 1994. This is shown in the following table: Year Ended December 31, 1995 1994 Income before income taxes $ 6,141,000 $ 25,737,000 Patent suit recoveries - CMI litigation (14,947,000) Gain on sale of Wibau-Astec (2,449,000) Loss on abandonment of Astec-Europa 7,037,000 Loss from foreign subsidiaries 3,598,000 5,366,000 Adjusted pre-tax income from domestic operations 14,327,000 16,156,000 Income taxes for domestic operations (5,487,000) (916,000) Net income from domestic operations $ 8,840,000 $ 15,240,000 The decrease in adjusted pre-tax income for domestic operations of $1,829,000 in 1995 as compared to 1994 is the result of increased gross profit margin due to increased sales of domestic subsidiaries which were more than offset by increased interest, research and development expenses and a decrease in other income from domestic subsidiaries. Net sales for 1995 were $242,601,000, an increase of $28,795,000 or approximately 13.5% compared to 1994. Of this increase, $14,615,000 is attributable to the acquisition of Gibat Ohl and the acquisition of the remaining 50% interest in Wibau-Astec. CEI, which was acquired in 1995, accounted for $3,543,000 in sales. Excluding the increase from the German operations and the CEI acquisition, sales increased $10,637,000 or 5.2%. International sales by domestic subsidiaries were 24.3% of total sales in both 1995 and 1994. The net increase in sales reflects a strong sales increase in asphalt plants, heaters and rock crushing equipment, but reduced sales in mobile equipment and trenchers. The gross profit margin for 1995 was 20.5% compared to 22.5% for 1994. This decrease is primarily due to lower gross profit margins from our foreign operations which had gross profit margins of 3.4% in 1995 compared to 11.4% in 1994. Domestic operations gross profit margin for 1995 was 22.5% compared to 23.0% for 1994. In 1995, selling, general, and administrative expenses decreased to 14.1% of net sales from 14.6% in 1994. The Gencor patent litigation accounted for $699,000 of legal fees which are included in 1995 patent damages and expenses. Research and development expenses increased from 1.5% of net sales in 1994 to 2.1% in 1995 primarily due to foreign operations. As noted above, income from operations was significantly impacted by the losses of Astec-Europa in 1995. The total pre-tax loss, including the cost of abandonment, was approximately $9,945,000. Astec-Europa incurred pre- tax operating losses in 1995 of approximately $2,908,000. Due to Astec- Europa's poor operating results and its negative net worth at December 31, 1995, the Company declined to contribute additional capital to Astec- Europa, electing instead to abandon the subsidiary in accordance with German law. Astec-Europa management filed a request for bankruptcy in Germany on February 9, 1996. Consequently, the Company does not believe that it will be required to fund Astec-Europa's liabilities except for certain liabilities previously guaranteed by the Company. The loss on abandonment of approximately $7,037,000 includes the liabilities of Astec- Europa that were guaranteed by the Company and the remainder of the original investment recorded on the books of the Company. Interest expense for 1995 increased to .9% of net sales from .3% in 1994. The increase resulted from increased inventories in anticipation of sales which did not materialize and investment in capital expenditures of $15,160,000. Other income increased by approximately $722,000 or 36.7% in 1995, resulting primarily from Astec-Europa (formerly Gibat Ohl) receiving $1,430,000 to settle various claims related to Astec-Europa's business operations. The gain on sale of foreign subsidiary of $2,449,000 in 1995 is due to the sale of Wibau-Astec as described in Note 2 to Consolidated Financial Statements. Income tax expense for 1995 was $1,580,000 or approximately 25.7% of pre-tax income compared to $2,300,000 or approximately 8.9% of pre-tax income in 1994. The reason for the variance from the normal corporate tax rate in 1994 was the utilization of net operating loss carryforwards and establishment of a deferred tax benefit relative to net deductible temporary differences which could be recovered against future taxes or taxes previously paid. The variance in 1995 is primarily attributed to foreign operations. See Note 9 to Consolidated Financial Statements. Due to the utilization of the majority of its credit carryforwards, the Company's tax rate for 1996 and subsequent years will approximate the normal corporate rate. The backlog at December 31, 1995 is $34,751,000 compared to $50,465,000 at December 31, 1994 which represents a 31.1% decrease. The Company's backlog for 1994 was unusually large primarily due to the optimism of many of our major customers about the strength of the economy and increased demand resulting from the renewed emphasis to rebuild infrastructure. The Company's current backlog is more consistent with the historical trend experienced by the Company. Results of Operations 1994 vs. 1993 Net sales for 1994 increased $41,005,000 or approximately 23.7% compared to 1993. Of this increase, $10,133,000 was attributable to the acquisition of Gibat Ohl and the remaining 50% of Wibau-Astec. Excluding these acquisitions, sales increased $30,872,000 or 17.9%. International sales by domestic subsidiaries were 24.3% in 1994 and 17.2% in 1993. The increase in sales reflected the strength of our economy, the attitude of our customers toward the economy, expectations for infrastructure contracts and the quality, performance and competitiveness of our products as a result of many years of investment in research and development. The gross profit margin for 1994 was 22.5% compared to 24.2% for 1993. Domestic operations gross profit margin for 1994 was 23.0% compared to 24.2% for 1993. Foreign operations gross profit margin was 11.4% The domestic gross profit margin was negatively effected in 1994 for several reasons: 1) Telsmith's consolidation of plant operations with many inefficiencies involved. 2) Trencor's relocation to facilities in Grapevine, Texas from Grand Prairie, Texas. 3) Inefficiencies related to the training of a significant number of new manufacturing employees at Trencor and training of replacements for retirees at Telsmith. 4) Trencor's introduction of the Log Hog product line. Offsetting these negative factors were improved margins at Heatec and increased manufacturing efficiencies at Roadtec, both of which positively affected the gross profit margin. In 1994, selling, general, and administrative expenses decreased to 14.6% of net sales from 16.6% in 1993. The increase in sales was the primary reason for the percentage reduction. Research and development expense declined from 1.7% of net sales in 1993 to 1.5% in 1994, again, primarily due to the increase in sales. In October 1994, the decision by the United States Supreme Court to deny certiorari in connection with the appeal filed by CMI Corporation ("CMI") brought to a successful end the Company's long-standing patent litigation with CMI. The Supreme Court's actions effectively denied CMI's request to appeal a lower court ruling that found Astec did not have liability for infringement of CMI patents and left intact damages payable by CMI to Astec. As a result, previously established liabilities of $13,870,000, payable by the Company, were reversed and patent damages of $1,309,000 were received from CMI. These amounts are shown in Consolidated Statements of Income as net recoveries and accrual adjustments of patent damages. See "Contingencies" and Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Because our joint venture, Wibau-Astec, continued to be unprofitable, it became apparent that major changes were necessary and we began a plan of restructuring. Restructuring costs of $1,500,000 related to Wibau-Astec are discussed in Note 12 to Consolidated Financial Statements. The anticipated effect of the restructuring plan was reflected in the pro forma summary included in Note 2. Interest expense for 1994 decreased to 0.3% of net sales from 1.0% in 1993. This was due to a decrease in overall interest expense combined with the increase in sales. Plant expansion and improvements were financed by industrial revenue bonds at favorable interest rates. Other income decreased by approximately $371,000 or 15.9% in 1994. This was due to the fact that one international licensee that was not renewed for 1994 produced $665,000 in license fees in 1993. The equity in loss of joint venture of $3,177,000 reflects 50% of the losses from the joint venture for the ten months prior to the purchase of the remaining 50% interest in Wibau-Astec. Income tax expense for 1994 was $2,300,000 or approximately 8.9% of pre- tax income. The primary reasons for the variance from the normal corporate tax rate were the utilization of net operating loss carryforwards and establishment of a deferred tax benefit relative to net deductible temporary differences which could be recovered against future taxes or taxes previously paid. See Note 9 to Consolidated Financial Statements. In the first quarter of 1993, the Company adopted SFAS No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes". At December 31, 1994, there were net deferred tax assets of approximately $14,799,000, which were comprised of temporary differences, the tax benefit of net operating loss and credit carryforwards and foreign net operating loss carryforwards. Temporary differences related primarily to inventory reserves, warranty reserves and bad debt reserves. At December 31, 1994, a valuation allowance of approximately $10,070,000 was recorded. This valuation allowance offsets the deferred tax assets relative to net operating loss carryforwards. Both the net operating loss and credit carryforwards are SRLY carryforwards and can be used to offset only the income of a certain subsidiary of the Company. As a result, the Company determined that a valuation allowance was necessary for these items as well as the foreign net operating loss carryforward, the utilization of which was uncertain. The backlog at December 31, 1994 was $50,465,000 compared to $33,100,000 at December 31, 1993 which represents a 52.4% increase. The increase was primarily due to the optimism of our customers about the strength of the economy and the performance and competitiveness of our products. Liquidity and Capital Resources Working capital increased to $58,015,000 at December 31, 1995 from $53,000,000 at ResourcesDecember 31, 1994. The Company's debt to equity ratio was .19 to 1 at December 31, 1995 and .27 to 1 at December 31, 1994. The debt for foreign subsidiaries has been removed from the balance sheet as a result of the sale of Wibau-Astec and the abandonment of Astec- Europa. Total short-term borrowings, including current maturities of long-term debt, were $774,000 at December 31, 1995 and $8,573,000 at December 31, 1994. Long-term debt, less current maturities was $17,150,000 at December 31, 1995 and $16,155,000 at December 31, 1994. Capital expenditures of $15,160,000 were made in 1995 as compared to capital expenditures in 1994 of $21,886,000. The Company utilized industrial revenue bonds in 1994 in the amount of $8,000,000 to finance the Grapevine, Texas (Trencor) project which included improvements to the existing facility as well as additions of new equipment. Industrial bonds were issued in February 1994 in the amount of $6,000,000 to assist in financing the Telsmith expansion at Mequon, Wisconsin. The Company has an unsecured revolving credit loan agreement with The First National Bank of Chicago. The line of credit is $22,000,000. This credit facility expires June 30, 1997. At December 31, 1995, $4,150,000 of the line of credit was utilized. At December 31, 1995 the Company was in violation of the $10,000,000 limit on capital expenditures and has received a waiver for such violation. As a result of the Company's decision to abandon Astec-Europa (see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements), the Company will be required to pay approximately $2,116,000 for bank loans made to Astec-Europa that were guaranteed by the Company and $1,228,000 in warranties guaranteed by the Company. It is expected that these amounts will be funded from cash from operations or by use of the Company's line of credit. The guaranteed payments required for loans and warranties have been accrued and are included in other liabilities. For additional information on current and long-term debt, see Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Contingencies See Note 10 to Consolidated Financial Statements for information on certain pending litigation and contingent liabilities arising from recourse financing arrangements. Environmental Matters Based on information available from environmental consultants, the Company has no material reserve requirements for potential environmental liabilities. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET December 31, 1995 1994 Assets Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents note 1 $ 3,133,070 $ 10,471,444 Trade receivables less allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,279,000 in 1995 and $1,684,000 in 1994 27,075,401 29,852,180 Notes and other receivables 596,134 215,390 Inventories note 1,4 55,882,679 56,309,735 Prepaid expenses 894,593 2,149,795 Refundable income taxes 2,341,849 Deferred tax asset note 9 6,667,052 2,901,799 Other current assets 5,214 236,229 Total current assets 96,595,992 102,136,572 Property and equipment, net note 5 51,709,033 42,348,792 Other assets: Goodwill 4,066,152 8,370,662 Notes receivable 572,829 Deferred tax asset note 9 1,827,494 Other 1,412,326 1,280,069 Total other assets 6,051,307 11,478,225 Total $ 154,356,332 $ 155,963,589 Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity Current liabilities: Notes payable $ 3,249 $ 8,072,502 Current maturities of long-term debt note 7 771,025 500,000 Accounts payable 15,877,964 14,262,518 Customer deposits 4,989,557 6,301,481 Accrued product warranty 2,470,775 3,470,703 Income taxes payable note 9 1,987,511 Other accrued liabilities 14,468,042 14,541,920 Total current liabilities 38,580,612 49,136,635 Long-term debt, less current maturities note 7 17,150,000 16,155,000 Deferred tax liability note 9 2,351,283 Deferred retirement costs note 8 373,310 192,242 Other 106,716 Total liabilities 58,455,205 65,590,593 Shareholders' equity: note 1,11 Preferred stock - authorized 2,000,000 shares of $1.00 par value; none issued Common stock - authorized 20,000,000 shares of $.20 par value; issued and outstanding - 10,092,199 in 1995 and 10,001,831 in 1994 2,018,440 2,000,366 Additional paid-in-capital 51,940,580 50,900,908 Foreign currency translation adjustment 89,975 Retained earnings 41,942,107 37,381,747 Total shareholders' equity 95,901,127 90,372,996 Total $ 154,356,332 $ 155,963,589 See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME Year Ended December 31, 1995 1994 1993 Net sales $ 242,601,351 $ 213,806,411 $ 172,801,465 Cost of sales 192,844,160 165,709,245 130,906,009 Gross profit 49,757,191 48,097,166 41,895,456 Selling, general, and administrative expenses 34,325,974 31,142,335 28,624,179 Research and development expenses 5,128,495 3,165,795 2,922,921 Patent suit damages and expenses (net recoveries and accrual adjustments) note 10 699,222 (14,947,498) 374,740 Restructuring costs note 12 1,500,469 Loss on abandonment of foreign subsidiary note 3 7,037,105 Income from operations 2,566,395 27,236,065 9,973,616 Other income(expense): Interest expense (2,125,261) (712,853) (1,787,742) Loan prepayment penalty and expenses note 7 (544,783) Interest income 565,724 426,489 516,957 Other income - net 2,685,161 1,963,633 2,334,407 Gain on sale of foreign subsidiary note 2 2,448,551 Equity in loss of joint venture note 2 (3,176,834) (720,000) Income before income taxes 6,140,570 25,736,500 9,772,455 Income taxes note 9 1,580,210 2,300,126 434,246 Net income $ 4,560,360 $ 23,436,374 $ 9,338,209 Earnings per Common and Common Equivalent Share: Net income $ .45 $2.38 $ 1.07 Weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding note 1 10,071,930 9,843,980 8,694,478 See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY <TABLE> Common Stock note 1 Additional Foreign Currency Retained Shares Amount Paid-in Capital Translation Adjustment Earnings <CAPTION> Balance December 31, <CAPTION> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> 1992 3,658,634 $ 731,713 $ 22,291,705 $0 $ 4,607,164 Issuance of common stock 1,243,067 248,627 26,887,481 Stock dividend 4,893,701 978,740 (978,740) Net income 9,338,209 Balance December 31, 1993 9,795,402 1,959,080 48,200,446 13,945,373 Issuance of common stock 206,429 41,286 2,700,462 Change during year $ 89,975 Net income 23,436,374 Balance December 31, 1994 10,001,831 2,000,366 50,900,908 89,975 37,381,747 Issuance of common stock 90,368 18,074 1,039,672 Change during year (89,975) Net income 4,560,360 Balance December 31, 1995 10,092,199 $ 2,018,440 $ 51,940,580 $ 0 $ 41,942,107 </TABLE> See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS Year Ended December 31, 1995 1994 1993 Cash Flows From Operating Activities Net income $ 4,560,360 $ 23,436,374 $ 9,338,209 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: Depreciation and amortization 5,697,862 3,941,871 3,105,694 Provision for doubtful accounts 533,136 362,089 742,752 Provision for inventory reserves 1,196,876 3,621,218 2,952,918 Provision for warranty 3,194,240 2,616,565 2,689,441 Provision for patent damages (net recoveries and accrual adjustments) (13,250,048) 13,697 Foreign currency translation adjustment (74,519) 89,975 (Gain) loss on sale of fixed assets (263,195) 322,587 (19,976) Equity in loss of joint venture 3,176,834 720,000 Gain on sale of foreign subsidiary (2,448,551) Loss on abandonment of foreign subsidiary 7,037,105 (Increase) decrease in: Receivables (2,551,526) (7,660,990) (7,105,758) Inventories (5,921,052) (3,537,955) (2,988,734) Prepaid expenses (2,071,266) (803,177) (337,248) Patent damage escrow funds 12,309,420 (705,431) Deferred tax asset 413,524 (4,156,695) (572,598) Other assets (993,322) (1,916,921) (400,318) Increase (decrease) in: Accounts payable 6,062,733 2,138,449 1,054,970 Customer deposits (1,211,925) (1,738,643) 113,091 Accrued product warranty (3,433,374) (2,256,128) (2,459,558) Income taxes payable (1,117,518) 400,355 877,225 Reserve for patent damages 681,711 Other accrued liabilities (2,373,657) (947,201) 1,376,519 Total adjustments 1,675,571 (7,288,395) (261,603) Net cash provided by operating activities 6,235,931 16,147,979 9,076,606 Cash Flows From Investing Activities Proceeds from sale of property and equipment - net 953,766 307,099 74,284 Expenditures for property and equipment (15,159,921) (21,886,011) (8,767,135) Cash received in connection with sale of subsidiary (36,687) Cash balance abandoned with subsidiary (203,643) Repayments on notes receivable 95,256 600,499 47,672 Investment in joint venture (635,700) (589,900) Cash payments in connection with business combination, net of cash acquired (834,591) 1,447,965 Net cash (used by) investing activities (15,185,820) (20,166,148) (9,235,079) Cash Flows From Financing Activities Proceeds from industrial bonds 14,000,000 Proceeds form issuance of common stock 9,750 34,750 27,136,109 Net (repayments) borrowings under revolving credit loan 1,495,000 2,655,000 (4,675,000) Principal repayments of industrial bonds, loans and notes payable (1,523,213) (5,658,355) (21,078,374) Proceeds from debt and notes payable 1,629,978 Net cash provided by financing activities 1,611,515 11,031,395 1,382,735 Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents (7,338,374) 7,013,226 1,224,262 Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period 10,471,444 3,458,218 2,233,956 Cash and cash equivalents end of period $ 3,133,070 $ 10,471,444 $3,458,218 Supplemental Cash Flow Information Cash paid during the year for: Interest $ 1,800,598 $ 595,767 $ 2,600,688 Income taxes $ 5,088,465 $ 6,282,709 $ 176,021 Excluded from the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows were the following effects of non-cash investing and financing activities: Capital stock issued for purchase of subsidiary: Investment in subsidiary $ 1,047,996 $ 2,706,996 Capital stock (17,467) (39,871) Additional paid-in-capital (1,030,529) (2,667,125) Non-cash sale of assets by assumption of receivable: Property and equipment $ (8,244) Receivable - other 8,244 Non-cash transfer of assets: Trade receivables $ 90,435 Notes receivables (90,435) Non-cash purchase of assets: Property, plant and equipment $ 547,587 Accrued liability (547,587) Non-cash assets assumed in connection with recourse customer financing: Notes receivables $ 369,229 Inventory (369,229) See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 1. Summary of Significant Basis of Presentation - The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Accounting Policies Astec Industries, Inc. and its subsidiaries. The Company's wholly-owned subsidiaries at December 31, 1995 are as follows: Astec, Inc. Roadtec, Inc. CEI Enterprises, Inc. Telsmith, Inc. Heatec, Inc. Trencor, Inc During 1995 Wibau-Astec Maschinenfabrik GmbH ("Wibau-Astec") was sold and Gibat Ohl Ingenieurgesellschaft fur Anlagentechnik ("Gibat Ohl") was abandoned. See Notes 2 and 3. All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Use of Estimates - The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Segment Information - The Company operates in one industry segment. Its products are used predominately for road construction and for the manufacture and processing of construction aggregates. International sales by domestic subsidiaries were $58,965,000, $52,031,000, and $29,693,000 for the years ended December 31, 1995, 1994 and 1993, respectively. Net sales and net losses of foreign operations were $24,748,000 and $3,044,000 for the year ended December 31, 1995, and $10,133,000 and $5,394,000 for the year ended December 31, 1994. At December 31, 1994, assets of foreign subsidiaries were $23,953,000. See Notes 2 and 3. Cash Equivalents - The Company considers all highly liquid instruments purchased with a maturity of less than three months to be cash equivalents. Inventories - Inventories (excluding used equipment) are stated at the lower of first-in, first-out cost or market. Used equipment inventories are stated on the specific unit cost method, which in the aggregate is less than market. Property and Equipment - Property and equipment is stated at cost. Depreciation is computed generally on the straight-line method for financial reporting purposes at rates considered sufficient to amortize costs over estimated useful lives. Depreciation is computed generally on both accelerated and straight-line methods for tax reporting purposes. Maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. Goodwill - Goodwill represents the excess of cost over the fair value of net assets acquired. Goodwill amounts are being amortized using the straight- line method over twenty years. Additions to goodwill in 1995 reflect the purchase of CEI Enterprises, Inc. Product Warranty - The Company provides product warranties against defects in materials and workmanship for periods ranging from ninety days to one year following the date of sale. Estimated costs of product warranties are charged to cost of sales in the period of the sale. Revenue Recognition - A portion of the Company's equipment sales represents equipment produced in the Company's plants under short-term contracts for a specific customer project or equipment designed to meet a customer's specific requirements. Equipment revenues are recognized in compliance with the terms and conditions of each contract, which is ordinarily at the time the equipment is shipped. Certain contracts include terms and conditions through which the Company recognized revenues upon completion of equipment production which is subsequently stored at the Company's plant at the customer's request. Revenue is recorded on such contracts upon the customer's assumption of title and all risks of ownership. 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Foreign Currency Translation - The financial statements of foreign subsidiaries have been translated into U.S. Dollars in accordance with FASB Statement No. 52, "Foreign Currency Translation". All balance sheet accounts have been translated using the exchange rate in effect at the balance sheet date. Income statement amounts have been translated using average exchange rate for the year. The gains and losses resulting from the changes in exchange rates from year to year have been reported separately as a component of shareholders' equity. Stock Based Compensation - The Company grants stock options for a fixed number of shares to employees with an exercise price equal to the fair value of the shares at the date of grant. The Company accounts for stock options granted in accordance with APB Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees" and, accordingly, recognizes no compensation expense for the stock option grants. Earnings Per Share - Primary and fully diluted earnings per share are based on the weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding and include the potentially dilutive effects of the exercise of stock options in years where there are earnings. Fully diluted earnings per share are not presented for 1995, 1994, or 1993 since the dilution is not material. Earnings per share information has been restated to retroactively reflect the two-for-one stock split effected in the form of a dividend on August 12, 1993. Accounting Change - Effective, January 1, 1995, the Company adopted SFAS No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of". SFAS No. 121 requires impairment losses to be recorded on long-lived assets used in operations when indicators of impairment are present and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the assets' carrying amount. SFAS No. 121 also addresses the accounting for long-lived assets that are expected to be disposed of. During 1995, events and circumstances indicated that approximately $4,400,000 of assets of the Company's subsidiary, Astec-Europa might be impaired. As further discussed in Note 3, these assets were written off in connection with the abandonment of Astec-Europa. 2. Business Combinations On February 28, 1995, the Company acquired the operating assets and liabilities of Trace Industries, Inc., a New Mexico corporation doing business as CEI Enterprises ("CEI") in exchange for 87,333 shares of the Company's common stock and approximately $852,000 in cash. The operations of CEI are included in the consolidated statements of income from the effective date of acquisition. The transaction was accounted for as a purchase and the purchase price of approximately $1,900,000 was allocated to the net tangible assets acquired based on the estimated fair market values of the assets acquired. The excess of the purchase price over the fair market value of CEI's net tangible assets was recorded as goodwill and is being amortized using the straight-line method over 20 years. A summary of the net assets acquired is as follows: Current assets $ 1,035,148 Property, plant and equipment 243,877 Current liabilities (768,647) Other liabilities (39,683) Goodwill 1,411,892 Net assets acquired excluding cash 1,882,587 Cash 17,413 Net assets acquired $ 1,900,000 Effective July 1, 1993, the Company entered into a joint venture with Putzmeister-Werk Maschinenfabrik GmbH ("Putzmeister") to form a new German limited liability company, Wibau-Astec Maschinenfabrik GmbH ("Wibau-Astec"). Wibau-Astec designed, engineered, manufactured and marketed asphalt plants, stabilization plants, asphalt and thermal heaters, hot storage systems and soil remediation equipment. Putzmeister and the Company each owned 50% of Wibau- Astec. On November 7, 1994, the Company acquired the remaining shares of Wibau-Astec from Putzmeister for $67,400. The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase effective November 7, 1994 and accordingly, the results of operations and accounts of Wibau-Astec subsequent to November 7, 1994 are included in the Company's consolidated financial statements. The purchase price was allocated to the net tangible assets of Wibau-Astec based on the estimated fair market value of the assets acquired. As required by the purchase method of accounting, the excess amount of the purchase price over the fair value of Wibau-Astec's net tangible assets was recorded as goodwill and was being amortized using the straight-line method over 20 years. Subsequent to the acquisition of Wibau-Astec, the Company undertook a plan to restructure Wibau-Astec's operations. See Note 12 - Restructuring Costs. Effective June 30, 1995, the Company sold Wibau- Astec to Wirtgen Gesellschaft mit beschrankter Haftung for approximately $1,109,000. For the six months ended June 30, 1995, Wibau-Astec had a net loss of approximately $688,000. The Company realized a gain of approximately $2,449,000 on the sale of Wibau-Astec. Effective October 17, 1994, the Company acquired the operating assets and liabilities of Gibat Ohl Ingenieurgesellschaft fur Anlagentechnik ("Gibat Ohl") in exchange for 193,357 shares of the Company's common stock and approximately $2,760,000 in cash. The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase effective October 17, 1994, and accordingly, the results of operations and accounts of Gibat Ohl subsequent to October 17, 1994 are included in the Company's consolidated financial statements. The purchase price of approximately $5,460,000 was allocated to the net tangible assets of Gibat Ohl based on the estimated fair market value of the assets acquired. The excess of the purchase price over the fair market value of Gibat Ohl's net tangible assets was recorded as goodwill and was being amortized using the straight-line method over 20 years. During 1995, Gibat Ohl's name was changed to Astec-Europa and in February 1996, the Company abandoned Astec-Europa. See Note 3. A summary of the net assets acquired is as follows: Wibau-Astec Gibat Ohl Current assets $ 4,938,766 $ 11,007,164 Property, plant and equipment 412,193 300,657 Current liabilities (8,678,984) (10,029,223) Other liabilities (2,038,165) Goodwill 1,193,259 4,153,364 Net assets acquired excluding cash (4,172,931) 5,431,962 Cash 4,240,331 32,984 Net assets acquired $ 67,400 $ 5,464,946 The following unaudited pro forma summary presents the consolidated results of operations as if the acquisitions discussed above had occurred at the beginning of each of the periods presented. Pro forma adjustments have been made to 1994 and 1993 to reflect the restructuring of Wibau-Astec as described in Note 12. The pro forma results have been prepared for comparative purposes only and do not purport to be indicative of the results that would have incurred had the acquisition occurred at the beginning of the periods presented or of results which may occur in the future. Year Ended December 31, 1995 1994 1993 Net sales $ 243,493,000 $ 227,891,000 $ 188,823,000 Income from operations 6,213,000 28,814,000 10,576,000 Net income 4,619,000 24,863,000 9,638,000 Per common and common equivalent share: Net income $ .46 $ 2.53 $ 1.11 Prior to its acquisition of the remaining 50% interest in Wibau-Astec, the Company's investment in Wibau-Astec was accounted for by the equity method. Accordingly, net income as presented in the Consolidated Statements of Income for 1994 and 1993 includes the Company's share of Wibau-Astec's losses for periods prior to the acquisition of $3,177,000 and $720,000, respectively. 3. Abandonment of Foreign Subsidiary During 1995, the Company's subsidiary, Astec-Europa, incurred a net loss of approximately $2,354,000 and had a negative net worth at December 31, 1995. The Company determined that it would no longer support Astec-Europa and on February 9, 1996, Astec-Europa management filed a request for bankruptcy in Germany. Due to its decision to abandon Astec-Europa, the Company will not recover any amounts related to Astec- Europa's assets nor will it be required to liquidate Astec-Europa's liabilities except to the extent such liabilities were guaranteed by the Company. Accordingly, Astec-Europa's assets and liabilities at December 31, 1995 were adjusted to liquidation basis values. This, along with the write-off of the Company's investment in Astec-Europa and the remaining goodwill associated with Astec-Europa of approximately $3,911,000 resulted in a total write-off related to the abandonment of approximately $7,037,000 before tax and $3,683,000 after tax. Total losses recognized in 1995, including net loss from operations and the loss on abandonment, related to Astec-Europa were approximately $9,945,000 before tax or $6,037,000 after tax. 4. Inventories Inventories consisted of the following: December 31, 1995 1994 Raw materials and parts $ 23,709,839 $ 26,705,110 Work-in-process 10,384,847 14,380,192 Finished goods 14,583,127 7,745,709 Used equipment 7,204,866 7,478,724 Total $ 55,882,679 $ 56,309,735 5. Property and Equipment Property and equipment consisted of the following: December 31, 1995 1994 Land, land improvements, and buildings $ 35,220,996 $ 26,676,486 Equipment 39,322,961 37,497,348 Less accumulated depreciation (22,864,623) (21,880,823) Land, buildings, and equipment - net 51,679,334 42,293,011 Rental property: Equipment 122,347 1,703,608 Less accumulated depreciation (92,648) (1,647,827) Rental property - net 29,699 55,781 Total $ 51,709,033 $ 42,348,792 6. Leases The Company leases certain land, buildings and equipment which are used in its operations. Total rental expense charged to operations under operating leases was approximately $1,213,000, $615,000 and $427,000 for the years ended December 31, 1995, 1994 and 1993 respectively. Minimum rental commitments for all noncancelable operating leases at December 31, 1995 are as follows: 1996 $ 691,000 1997 444,000 1998 230,000 1999 122,000 2000 and beyond 100,000 The Company also leases equipment to customers under short-term contracts generally ranging from two months to six months. Rental income under such leases was $1,630,000, $1,394,000 and $1,719,000 for the years ended December 31, 1995, 1994 and 1993, respectively. 7. Long-term Debt Long-term debt consisted of the following: December 31, 1995 1994 Revolving credit loan of $22,000,000 at December 31, 1995 and $15,000,000 at December 31, 1994, available through June 30, 1997 at an interest rate of prime less a quarter, which was 8.25% at December 31, 1995 and 1994 $ 4,150,000 $ 2,655,000 Loans payable maturing at various dates through 1996 at interest rates from 8.5% to 9.25% 271,025 Industrial Development Revenue Bonds payable in annual installments through 2006 at weekly negotiated interest rates 5,500,000 6,000,000 Industrial Development Revenue Bonds due in 2019 at weekly negotiated interest rates 8,000,000 8,000,000 Total long-term debt 17,921,025 16,655,000 Less current maturities 771,025 500,000 Long-term debt less current maturities $ 17,150,000 $ 16,155,000 During 1995, the Company amended its unsecured revolving loan agreement negotiated in 1994 thereby increasing the line of credit to $22,000,000. The loan agreement contains certain restrictive covenants relative to operating ratios and capital expenditures and also restricts the payment of dividends. At December 31, 1995, the Company was in violation of the covenant relative to capital expenditures and has received a waiver for such violation. The aggregate of all maturities of long-term debt in each of the next five years is a follows: 1996 $ 771,025 1997 4,650,000 1998 500,000 1999 500,000 2000 and beyond 11,500,000 For 1995, the weighted average interest rate on short term borrowings, which include current maturities of Industrial Revenue Bonds and notes payable, were 4.16% and 8.62%, respectively. 8. Retirement Benefits A former subsidiary of the Company, the Barber-Greene Company, had defined benefit pension plans ("Barber-Greene Plans") covering substantially all of its employees. Non-union benefits were frozen as of September 1, 1986, and certain union benefits were frozen as of October 31, 1986. The Company retained responsibility for the Barber-Greene Plans when it sold the Barber-Greene Company in 1991. Telsmith, Inc. also sponsors a defined benefit pension plan covering certain employees hired prior to October 14, 1987 who have chosen not to participate in the Company's 401(k) savings plan. The benefit is based on years of benefit service multiplied by a monthly benefit as specified in the plan. The Company's funding policy for its pension plans is to make the minimum annual contributions required by applicable regulations. During 1994, the Company made the decision to terminate the Barber- Greene Plans and purchased annuities to fund the benefits provided for in the plans. In 1995, the Company received approval from the Internal Revenue Service to terminate the plans. As a result, the settlement loss of approximately $46,000 is included in Other income-net in 1995. A reconciliation of the funded status of the Plans, which is based on a valuation date of September 30, with amounts reported in the Company's consolidated balance sheets, is as follows: Year Ended December 31, 1995 1994 Actuarial present value of benefit obligations: Vested $ 2,991,159 $ 40,574,462 Nonvested 90,781 85,245 Accumulated benefit obligation $ 3,081,940 $ 40,659,707 Projected benefit obligation $ 3,081,940 $ 40,659,707 Plan assets at fair value 2,539,151 40,589,417 Projected benefit obligation in excess of plan assets 542,789 70,290 Unrecognized net gain 6,046 450,751 Prior service cost not yet recognized in net periodic pension cost (148,819) (320,665) Pension liability in the consolidated balance sheets $ 400,016 $ 200,376 Net periodic pension cost for 1995, 1994 and 1993 included the following components: Year Ended December 31, 1995 1994 1993 Service cost - benefits earned during the period $ 24,585 $ 31,503 $ 26,873 Interest cost on projected benefit obligation 219,465 2,565,355 2,754,319 Actual return on plan assets (238,493) 2,148,873 (12,318,009) Net amortization and deferral (6,682) (5,405,871) 9,345,175 Net (income) $ (1,125) $ (660,140) $ (191,642) The weighted average discount rate used in determining the actuarial present value of the projected benefit obligation was 7.5% and 8.5% at September 30, 1995 and 1994, respectively. The expected long-term rate of return on assets was 9.0% for the years ending September 30, 1995 and 1994. Plan assets are primarily comprised of corporate equity and corporate and U.S. Treasury debt securities. In 1987, the Company adopted deferred savings plan ("Savings Plans") under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code, under which substantially all employees of the Company and its subsidiaries are eligible. In 1991, the Savings Plans were consolidated and provide that the Company match an amount equal to 50% of employee savings subject to certain limitations. The total expense for such matching was approximately $777,000, $696,000, and $567,000 for the years ended December 31, 1995, 1994 and 1993 respectively. In addition to the retirement plans discussed above, the Company has an unfunded postretirement medical and life insurance plan covering employees of its Telsmith, Inc. subsidiary and retirees of its former Barber- Greene subsidiary. Effective January 1, 1993, the Company adopted SFAS No. 106, "Employers' Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other than Pensions". The accumulated postretirement benefit obligation ("APBO") at adoption was approximately $674,000 and is being amortized over 20 years. The accumulated postretirement benefit obligation and the amount recognized in the Company's consolidated balance sheets, is as follows: December 31, 1995 1994 Accumulated postretirement benefit obligation: Retirees $ 246,300 $ 130,600 Active employees 393,500 473,000 639,800 603,600 Unamortized transition obligation (571,900) (605,600) Unrecognized net gain 118,800 118,800 Accrued postretirement benefit cost $ 186,700 $ 116,800 Net periodic postretirement benefit cost included the following components: December 31, 1995 1994 Service cost $ 53,300 $ 53,500 Interest cost 50,200 42,900 Amortization of transition obligation 33,700 33,700 Amortization of net gain (1,900) Net expense $ 135,300 $ 130,100 A discount rate of 8.5% was used in calculating the APBO. The APBO assumes a 13.5% increase in per capita health care costs decreasing gradually to 5.8% for years 2012 and later. A 1% increase in the medical inflation rate would increase the APBO by approximately $29,400 and the expense by approximately $7,500. 9. Income Taxes Effective January 1, 1993, the Company adopted SFAS No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes". There was no cumulative effect on income from the adoption of SFAS No. 109. For financial reporting purposes, income before income taxes includes the following components: Year Ended December 31, 1995 1994 1993 United States $ 16,497,616 $ 30,726,395 $ 9,474,455 Foreign: License income 277,855 404,000 1,018,000 Equity in loss of joint venture (3,176,834) (720,000) Loss from foreign subsidiaries (3,597,796) (2,217,061) Loss on adandonment (7,037,105) Income before income taxes $ 6,140,570 $25,736,500 $ 9,772,455 The provision for income taxes consisted of the following: Year Ended December 31, 1995 1994 1993 Current $ 1,166,956 $ 7,029,419 $ 434,246 Deferred (benefit) 413,254 (4,729,293) Total provision for income taxes $ 1,580,210 $ 2,300,126 $ 434,246 A reconciliation of the provision for income taxes at the statutory rate to those provided is as follows: Year Ended December 31, 1995 1994 1993 Tax at statutory rates $ 2,087,794 $ 9,007,775 $ 3,322,635 Effect of utilization of net operating loss carryforwards net of alternative minimum tax (1,344,000) (3,008,000) (3,155,253) Effect of utilization of alternative minimum tax credits (382,000) Benefit from foreign sales corporation (327,000) (265,000) State taxes, net of federal income tax benefit 522,000 212,000 115,271 Income taxes of other countries (553,000) 27,000 151,593 Loss from foreign operations (413,000) 2,636,000 Recognition of deferred tax asset 1,827,000 (4,729,000) Reversal of prior temporary differences (1,937,000) Other items (219,584) 738,351 Income taxes $ 1,580,210 $ 2,300,126 $ 434,246 At December 31, 1995, the Company had investment tax and other credit carryforwards of approximately $98,000 expiring at various dates principally from 1995 through 1999. Utilization of these credits will be limited to use in offsetting only the taxable income of a subsidiary of the Company. As a result of utilizing the net operating loss carryforwards, net income from continuing operations increased by approximately $.13, $.31 and $.36 for the years ended December 31, 1995, 1994 and 1993, respectively. At December 31, 1995, the Company had deferred tax assets of approximately $6,889,000, and deferred tax liabilities of approximately $2,475,000, related to temporary differences and tax loss and credit carryforwards. At December 31, 1995, a valuation allowance of approximately $98,000 was recorded. This valuation allowance offsets the deferred tax assets relative to credit carryforwards. The credit carryforwards are SRLY carryforwards and can be used to offset only the income of a certain subsidiary. Due to this, the Company determined that a valuation allowance was necessary for these items. The change in valuation allowance in 1995 is due to the loss of foreign net operating loss carryforwards ($8,085,000) due to the sale of the subsidiary, expiration of ITC credit carryforwards ($543,000) and the utilization of operating loss carryforwards ($1,344,000). Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial statement purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Significant components of the Company's deferred tax liabilities and assets are as follows: Year Ended December 31, 1995 1994 Deferred tax assets: Inventory reserves $ 2,067,000 $ 1,753,000 Legal reserves 152,000 100,000 Pension expense 112,000 109,000 Investment in foreign joint venture 1,827,000 Other accrued expenses 3,076,000 3,002,000 Net operating loss carryforwards 1,344,000 Foreign net operating loss carryforwards 1,384,000 8,085,000 Other credit carryforwards 98,000 641,000 Total deferred tax assets 6,889,000 16,861,000 Deferred tax liabilities: Property and equipment 2,475,000 2,062,000 Total deferred tax liabilities 2,475,000 2,062,000 Net deferred tax assets 4,414,000 14,799,000 Valuation allowance (98,000) (10,070,000) Deferred tax asset $ 4,316,000 $ 4,729,000 10. Contingencies The Company's subsidiary, Telsmith, was a defendant in a patent infringement action brought by Nordberg, Inc., a manufacturer of a competing line of rock crushing equipment, seeking monetary damages and an injunction to cease an alleged infringement of a patent on certain components used in the production of its rock crushing equipment. On March 30, 1995, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin issued a ruling in favor of the Company and entered a declaratory judgment in favor of Telsmith, and against Plaintiff Nordberg, Inc. declaring that claims 8 through 11 and 13 of Nordberg's United States patent No. 4,478,373, entitled "Conical Crusher" are invalid. The Court also entered judgment in favor of Telsmith, Inc. and against Nordberg, Inc. dismissing Nordberg's claim of infringement against Telsmith. The Company was pleased with the Court's decision, but has filed an appeal asking the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit to overturn the trial court's decision not to award Telsmith its attorney's fees in the case. Nordberg did not cross-appeal to the Federal Circuit on the Telsmith judgment. The time for doing so has now expired. The judgment has therefore become "final" as to those issues not raised by Telsmith on appeal. On October 28, 1993, the Company was also named as a defendant in a patent infringement action brought by Gencor, Inc., a manufacturer of a competing line of asphalt plants, seeking monetary damages and an injunction to cease an alleged infringement of a patent on certain components used in the production of its asphalt plant product line. This case was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Orlando Division, and went to trial on January 22, 1996. On February 3, 1996, the jury returned a verdict in the Company's favor holding that Astec's Double Barrel drum mixer does not infringe the Gencor patent in question. Judgment on that jury verdict was entered by the Court on February 5, 1996. It is anticipated that Gencor will appeal. Management believes that Gencor's anticipated appeal is without merit. During 1994, the United States Supreme Court refused to hear CMI Corporation's petition to overturn the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit's reversal of patent damages awarded to CMI Corporation and Robert L. Mendenhall by a lower court. As a result of the Supreme Court's refusal to grant certiorari, the Company received $12,917,000 which was being held in escrow pending the Company's appeal of the two judgments. In addition, on December 31, 1994, the Company received $1,309,000 from CMI in satisfaction of the judgment entered in favor of the Company on its counterclaim against CMI. The receipt of these funds effectively concluded the litigation between the Company and CMI and Robert L. Mendenhall which had been pending for a number of years. As a result, in 1994 the Company reversed its accrued liability for patent damages. The reversal of $13,870,000 in accrued patent damages and the receipt of $1,309,000 in patent damages from CMI total $15,179,000 and are included in the Consolidated Statements of Income as Patent suit damages and expenses (net recoveries and accrual adjustments). Management has reviewed all claims and lawsuits and, upon the advice of counsel, has made provision for any estimable losses; however, the Company is unable to predict the ultimate outcome of the outstanding claims and lawsuits. Recourse Customer Financing - Certain customers have financed purchases of the Company's products through arrangements in which the Company is contingently liable for customer debt aggregating approximately $7,362,000 and $13,800,000 at December 31, 1995 and 1994, respectively. These obligations average five years in duration and have minimal risk. Other - The Company is contingently liable for letters of credit of approximately $3,390,000 issued for bid bonds and performance bonds. 11. Shareholders' Equity Stock options - The Company has reserved 300,000 shares of common stock under the 1986 Stock Option Plan and 500,000 shares of common stock under the 1992 Stock Option Plan for issuance upon exercise of nonqualified options, incentive options and stock appreciation rights to officers and employees of the Company and its subsidiaries at prices determined by the Board of Directors. At December 31, 1995, a total of 261,800 shares of common stock related to the 1992 Stock Option Plan are available for options to be granted. Nonqualified options are exercisable at a price not less than 85% of the Board of Directors' determination of the fair market value of the Company's common stock on the date of the grant. Nonqualified options are exercisable starting one year from the date of the grant and expire ten years after the date of the grant. Incentive stock options granted by the Board of Directors must be exercisable at a price not less than 100% of the fair market value of the Company's common stock on the date of grant. Incentive stock options are exercisable immediately after the date of the grant, except for certain officers of the Company, and expire ten years after the date of the grant. Stock appreciation rights may be granted by the Board of Directors in conjunction with the grant of an incentive or nonqualified option. A stock appreciation right permits a grantee to receive payment in either cash or shares of the Company's common stock equal to the difference between the fair market value of the common stock and the exercise price for the related option. The following is a summary of stock option information: Outstanding, December 31, 1992 257,000 $ 1.375 - 4.675 Exercised (87,000) 1.375 - 4.675 Outstanding, December 31, 1993 170,000 1.375 - 4.675 Granted 87,000 14.875 - 16.363 Exercised (13,000) 1.375 - 3.25 Outstanding, December 31, 1994 244,000 1.375 - 16.363 Granted 67,000 12.875 - 14.163 Exercised (3,000) 3.25 Outstanding, December 31, 1995 308,000 $ 1.375 - 16.363 On July 29, 1993, the Company's Board of Directors approved a two-for-one split of the Company's common stock in the form of a 100% stock dividend for shareholders of record as of August 12, 1993. A total of 4,893,701 shares of common stock were issued in connection with the split. The stated par value of each share was not changed. A total of $978,740 was reclassified from additional paid-in-capital to the Company's common stock account. All share and per share amounts for 1993 and prior years have been restated to retroactively reflect the stock split. The Company has adopted a Shareholder Protection Rights Agreement and declared a distribution of one right (the "Right") for each outstanding share of Company common stock, par value $0.20 per share (the "Common Stock"). Each Right entitles the registered holder to purchase from the Company one one-hundreth of a share (a "Unit") of Series A Participating Preferred Stock, par value $1.00 per share (the "Preferred Stock"), at a purchase price of $36.00 per Unit, subject to adjustment. The rights currently attach to the certificates representing shares of outstanding Company Common Stock, and no separate Rights certificates will be distributed. The Rights will separate from the Common Stock upon the earlier of ten business days (unless otherwise delayed by the Board) following the (i) public announcement that a person or group of affiliated or associated persons (the "Acquiring Person") has acquired, obtained the right to acquire, or otherwise obtained beneficial ownership of 15% or more of the then outstanding shares of Common Stock, or (ii) commencement of a tender offer or exchange offer that would result in an Acquiring Person beneficially owning 15% or more of the then outstanding shares of Common Stock. The Board of Directors may terminate the Rights without any payment to the holders thereof at any time prior to the close of business ten business days following announcement by the Company that a person has become an Acquiring Person. The Rights, which do not have voting power and are not entitled to dividends, expire on December 21, 2005. In the event of a merger, consolidation, statutory share exchange or other transaction in which shares of Common Stock are exchanged, each Unit of Preferred Stock will be entitled to receive the per share amount paid in respect of each share of Common Stock. 12. Restructuring Costs In the fourth quarter of 1994, the Company developed and implemented a plan to restructure the operations of Wibau-Astec. In connection with the restructuring, the Company accrued costs of $1,500,000 ($1,250,000, net of tax, or $0.12 per share). The plan included, among other things, the cessation of manufacturing operations at Wibau-Astec along with related personnel reductions as well as personnel reductions in engineering and administration. Total personnel reductions were approximately 150. The plan was communicated to employees and severance notices given during the fourth quarter of 1994. As of the end of 1994, the restructuring was substantially complete. Total costs incurred were for the write-down of certain assets to estimated fair market value, severance payments and lease termination expenses. Severance costs and exit costs incurred were approximately $1,137,000 and $363,000, respectively. Costs incurred during 1995 were substantially the same as the amounts accrued as of December 31, 1994. Wibau-Astec sold Astec asphalt plants either manufactured in the United States or subcontracted in Europe. Wibau- Astec also sold Wibau-Astec parts and serviced a large customer base and utilized subcontractors as needed for parts and/or manufacturing components in Europe. As described in Note 2, Wibau-Astec was sold in 1995. 13. Financial Instruments Credit Risk - The Company sells products to a wide variety of customers. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and generally does not require collateral. The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts at a level which management believes is sufficient to cover potential credit losses. As of December 31, 1995, concentrations of credit risk with respect to trade receivables are limited due to the wide variety of customers. Fair Value of Financial Instruments - The book value of the Company's financial instruments approximates their fair values. Financial instruments include cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and long and short-term debt. Substantially all of the Company's short and long-term debt is floating rate debt and, accordingly, book value approximates its fair value. REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS The Board of Directors and Shareholders Astec Industries, Inc. We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Astec Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1995 and 1994, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1995. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Astec Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries at December 31, 1995 and 1994, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1995, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. As discussed in Note 1, in 1995 the Company changed its method of accounting for the impairment of long-lived assets and for long-lived assets to be disposed of. /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP Chattanooga, Tennessee February 27, 1996 CORPORATE INFORMATION Corporate and Subsidiary Executive Officers J. Don Brock Chairman of the Board and President Thomas R. Campbell President, Roadtec, Inc. M. Brent England President, CEI Enterprises, Inc. Jerry F. Gilbert President, Trencor, Inc. Albert E. Guth Senior Vice President, Secretary and Treasurer F. McKamy Hall Corporate Controller James G. May President, Heatec, Inc. W. Norman Smith President, Astec, Inc. Robert G. Stafford President, Telsmith, Inc. Board of Directors J. Don Brock +#Chairman of the Board and President George C. Dillon *Former Chairman, Manville Corporation Daniel K. Frierson *Chairman and CEO, Dixie Yarns Inc. Jerry F. Gilbert President, Trencor, Inc. Albert E. Guth +Senior Vice President, Secretary and Treasurer G. W. Jones *Former President of APAC, Inc. Joseph Martin, Jr. *Partner, Martin and Lacy William B. Sansom *Chairman and CEO , The H.T. Hackney Co. E.D. Sloan, Jr. *Chairman of the Board, Nolas Trading Co, Inc. W. Norman Smith +#President, Astec, Inc. Robert G. Stafford #President, Telsmith, Inc. *Member of the Audit and Compensation Committees +Member of the Executive Committee #Member of the Technical Committee Subsidiaries Astec, Inc. Chattanooga, Tennessee Heatec, Inc. Chattanooga, Tennessee CEI Enterprises, Inc. Albuquerque, New Mexico Roadtec, Inc. Chattanooga, Tennessee Telsmith, Inc. Mequon, Wisconsin Trencor, Inc. Grapevine, Texas Transfer Agent Registrar Chemical Mellon Shareholder Services, L.L.C. Overpeck Centre 85 Challenger Road Ridgefield Park, NJ 07660 Stock Exchange NASDAQ National Market - ASTE Auditors Ernst & Young LLP Chattanooga, Tennessee General Counsel and Litigation Stophel & Stophel, P.C. Chattanooga, Tennessee Securities Counsel Alston & Bird Atlanta, Georgia Corporate Office Astec Industries, Inc. 4101 Jerome Avenue P.O. Box 72787 Chattanooga, Tennessee 37407 Telephone 423-867-4210 The Form 10-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, may be obtained at no cost by any shareholder upon written request to the Senior Vice President of Astec Industries, Inc. The Annual Meeting will be held at 10:00 a.m. on Thursday, April 25, 1996 in the Training Center at the Corporate office located at 4101 Jerome Avenue, Chattanooga, Tennessee.