Bread Financial - 10-Q quarterly report FY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes þ     No  o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” inrule 12b-2of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer þ     Accelerated filer  o     Non-accelerated filer o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined inRule 12b-2of the Act).  Yes o     No þ

 

As of May 1, 2006, 81,212,893 shares of common stock were outstanding.

 

 

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

 

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

 

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

 

 

The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared by Alliance Data Systems Corporation (“ADSC” or, including its wholly owned subsidiaries, the “Company”), without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. However, the Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report filed onForm 10-K/Afor the year ended December 31, 2005.

 

The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included herein reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal, recurring adjustments) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to state fairly the results for the interim periods presented. The results of operations for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the operating results to be expected for any subsequent interim period or for the fiscal year.

 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

 

For purposes of comparability, certain prior period amounts, including marketing service revenue, have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. Such reclassifications have no impact on previously reported net income.

 

 

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income per share for the periods indicated:

 

 

 

 

 

In February 2006, the Company acquired Toronto-based iCom Information & Communications, Inc. (“ICOM”), a leading provider of targeted list, marketing data and communications solutions for the pharmaceutical industry in North America. Total consideration paid was approximately $35.6 million as of the closing date, including approximately $3.5 million which was placed in escrow for a period of up to 18 months to satisfy potential working capital adjustments and indemnification claims. As a result of this acquisition, the Company acquired approximately $10.8 million of customer contracts and $2.3 million of capitalized software. The results of operations for ICOM have been included since the date of acquisition and are reflected in our Marketing Services segment.

 

In April 2006, the Company acquired DoubleClick Email Solutions, one of the largest permission-based email marketing service providers, with operations across North America, Europe and Asia/Pacific. Total consideration paid was approximately $90.0 million.

 

 

Intangible assets consist of the following:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the three months ended March 31, 2006 are as follows:

 

 

Debt consists of the following:

 

 

As of March 31, 2006, the certificates of deposit had effective annual fixed rates ranging from 4.2% to 5.0%, and the credit facilities had a weighted average interest rate of 6.0%.

 

During January 2006, the Company entered into an additional credit agreement to increase its borrowing capacity by an incremental $300.0 million. The principal amount of all outstanding loans under this credit agreement, together with any accrued but unpaid interest, are due and payable on June 30, 2006, unless otherwise paid earlier pursuant to the terms of the credit agreement. This credit agreement includes usual and customary negative covenants for credit agreements of this type. Payment of amounts due under this credit agreement are secured by guaranties, pledges of the ownership interests of certain of the Company’s subsidiaries and pledges of certain intercompany promissory notes. On January 5, 2006, the Company borrowed $300.0 million under this credit agreement, which it is using for general corporate purposes, including other debt repayment, repurchases of its common stock in connection with its stock repurchase program, mergers and acquisitions, and working capital expenditures. The Company anticipates refinancing this facility prior to June 30, 2006.

 

On April 6, 2006, the Company amended its364-dayfacility to extend the maturity date from April 6, 2006 to April 5, 2007.

 

 

 

 

A reconciliation of deferred revenue for the AIR MILES Reward Program^®is as follows:

 

 

 

For the three months ended March 31, 2006, the Company has utilized an effective tax rate of 37.9% to calculate its provision for income taxes. In accordance with Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 28, Interim Financial Reporting, this effective tax rate is the Company’s expected annual effective tax rate for calendar year 2006 based on all known variables.

 

 

The components of comprehensive income, net of tax effect, are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consistent with prior periods, the Company classifies its businesses into three segments: Transaction Services, Credit Services and Marketing Services.

 

 

 

 

During the first quarter of 2006, the Company adopted the provisions of, and accounted for stock-based compensation in accordance with, Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS No. 123(R)”) which supersedes APB Opinion No. 25 “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” (“APB No. 25”). Under the fair value recognition provisions, stock-based compensation expense is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized ratably over the requisite service period. The Company elected the modified prospective method, under which prior periods are not revised for comparative purposes. The valuation provisions of SFAS No. 123(R) apply to new grants and to grants that were outstanding as of the effective date and are subsequently modified. Estimated compensation for grants that were outstanding as of the effective date will be recognized over the remaining service period using the compensation expense estimated for the SFAS No. 123 “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (“SFAS No. 123”) pro forma disclosures, as adjusted for forfeitures.

 

 

 

 

Total stock-based compensation expense recognized in the Company’s consolidated statements of income for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2006 respectively, is as follows:

 

 

As the amount of stock-based compensation expense recognized is based on awards ultimately expected to vest, the amount recognized in the Company’s results of operations has been reduced for estimated forfeitures. SFAS No. 123(R) requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. Forfeitures were estimated based on the Company’s historical experience. Prior to adoption, the Company accounted for forfeitures as they occurred in accordance with APB No. 25. As a result of the change in accounting principle, the Company recognized a reduction of stock-based compensation expense of $0.8 million, net of tax.

 

Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), the Company accounted for stock-based awards to employees using the intrinsic value method in accordance with APB No. 25. Under the intrinsic value method, no stock-based compensation expense for employee stock options was recognized in the Company’s results of operations as the exercise price equaled the fair market value of the underlying stock at the date of grant. In accordance with the modified prospective transition method, the Company’s prior year financial statements have not been restated to reflect the impact of the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R). The following table sets forth the pro forma amounts of net income and net income per share, for the three months ended March 31, 2005, that would have resulted if the Company had accounted for the stock-based awards under the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123:

 

 

As of March 31, 2006, there was $71.7 million of unrecognized expense, adjusted for estimated forfeitures, related to non-vested, stock-based equity awards granted to employees, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately two years.

 

 

 

 

 

Stock option awards are granted with an exercise price equal to the market price of the Company’s stock. Options typically vest ratably over three years and expire ten years after the date of grant. The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using a binomial lattice model. The following table indicates the assumptions used in estimating fair value for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and March 31, 2006:

 

 

The following table sets forth the summary of option activity under the Company’s stock option program for the three months ended March 31, 2006:

 

 

The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the three months ended March 31, 2006 was approximately $16.8 million.

 

The following table summarizes information concerning both outstanding and exercisable stock options at March 31, 2006:

 

 

 

 

 

The aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding and options exercisable as of March 31, 2006 was approximately $113.6 million and $84.6 million, respectively.

 

 

During the first quarter of 2006, the Company has awarded both time-based and performance-based restricted stock units. Fair value of the restricted stock is estimated on the date of grant. In accordance with SFAS No. 123(R), the Company will recognize the estimated stock-based compensation expense, net of estimated forfeitures; over the applicable service period.

 

Time-based restricted stock awards typically vest ratably over a three year period. Performance-based restricted stock awards vest if specified performance measures tied to the Company’s financial performance are met. Additionally, the vesting provisions of 86,314 performance-based restricted stock unit awards issued in 2006 to eight employees were modified in March 2006. The vesting provisions, which were dependent on the Company’s cash earnings per share (“EPS”) growth as compared to the S&P 500 EPS growth rate, were modified such that under the new terms, the vesting provisions are dependent on the Company’syear-over-yearcash EPS growth. The number of shares that vest may range from 0 to 200%. A minimum cash EPS growth rate of 10% is necessary for the minimum 50% vesting, 18% cash EPS growth for a 100% vesting, and 36% cash EPS growth (or more) for a maximum 200% vesting. The modification had no impact on the fair value of the award; however, it did result in a change in estimate of the most likely outcome of the number of shares to vest. The incremental stock-based compensation expense recorded as a result in the change in estimate was not material at March 31, 2006.

 

 

The weighted average grant-date fair value per share was $43.65 for restricted stock awards granted during the three months ended March 31, 2006.

 

 

The Company has an Amended and Restated Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”), which provides for three month offering periods, commencing on the first trading day of each calendar quarter and ending on the last trading day of each calendar quarter. The purchase price of the common stock is 85% of the fair market value of shares on the applicable purchase date as determined by averaging the high and low trading prices of the last trading day of each quarter. An employee may elect to pay the purchase price of such common stock through payroll deductions. The maximum number of shares that were reserved for issuance under the ESPP is 1,500,000 shares, subject to adjustment as provided in the ESPP. Effective July 1, 2005, employees are required to hold any stock purchased through the ESPP for 180 days prior to any sale or withdrawal of shares. In accordance with SFAS No. 123(R), the Company has recorded compensation expense for the difference between the fair value of the stock and the purchase price of the stock.

 

 

 

 

In April 2006, World Financial Network Credit Card Master Note Trust issued $395.0 million of Class ASeries 2006-Aasset backed notes that have an interest rate not to exceed one-month LIBOR plus 0.13% per year and that will mature in April 2013, $18.8 million of Class MSeries 2006-Aasset backed notes that have an interest rate not to exceed one-month LIBOR plus 0.21% per year that will mature in April 2013, $23.8 million of Class BSeries 2006-Aasset backed notes that have an interest rate not to exceed one-month LIBOR plus 0.35% per year that will mature in April 2013 and $62.5 million of Class CSeries 2006-Aasset backed notes that have an interest rate not to exceed one-month LIBOR plus 0.60% per year that will mature in April 2013.

 

The notes are rated AAA through BBB, or its equivalent, by each of Standard and Poor’s, Moody’s, and Fitch Ratings. In connection with the transaction, World Financial Network Credit Card Master Note Trust also entered into interest rate swaps that effectively fix the interest rate on the notes starting at 5.53% over the seven-year term of the interest rate swaps.

 

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto presented in this quarterly report and the notes thereto included in our Annual Report filed onForm 10-K/Afor the year ended December 31, 2005.

 

 

Our first quarter 2006 results included the following significant new and renewed agreements with significant clients and continued selective execution of our acquisition strategy:

 

 

 

There have been no material changes to our critical accounting policies and estimates from the information provided in Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in our Annual Report onForm 10-K/Afor the year ended December 31, 2005.

 

 

Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure equal to net income, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, plus stock compensation expense, provision for income taxes, interest expense, net, depreciation and other amortization and amortization of purchased intangibles. Operating EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure equal to adjusted EBITDA plus the change in deferred revenue less the change in redemption settlement assets. We have presented operating EBITDA because we use the financial measure as part of our monitoring of compliance with the financial covenants in our credit facilities. For the three months ended March 31, 2006, seniordebt-to-operatingEBITDA was 1.2x compared to a maximum ratio of 2.5x permitted in our credit facilities and operating EBITDA to interest expense was 17.9x compared to a minimum ratio of 3.5x permitted in our credit facilities. As discussed in more detail in the liquidity section of “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”, our credit facilities together with cash flow from operations are the two main sources of funding for our acquisition

strategy and for our future working capital needs and capital expenditures. As of March 31, 2006, we had borrowings of $547.1 million outstanding under these credit facilities and had approximately $267.9 million in unused borrowing capacity. During January 2006, we increased our borrowing capacity by an incremental $300.0 million through entering into an additional credit agreement. We were in compliance with our covenants at March 31, 2006, and we expect to be in compliance with these covenants under these credit facilities during the year ending December 31, 2006.

 

We use adjusted EBITDA as an integral part of our internal reporting to measure the performance of our reportable segments and to evaluate the performance of our senior management. Adjusted EBITDA is considered an important indicator of the operational strength of our businesses. Adjusted EBITDA eliminates the uneven effect across all business segments of considerable amounts of non-cash depreciation of tangible assets and amortization of certain intangible assets that were recognized in business combinations. A limitation of this measure, however, is that it does not reflect the periodic costs of certain capitalized tangible and intangible assets used in generating revenues in our businesses. Management evaluates the costs of such tangible and intangible assets, the impact of related impairments, as well as asset sales through other financial measures, such as capital expenditures, investment spending and return on capital. Adjusted EBITDA also eliminates the non-cash effect of stock compensation expense. Stock compensation expense is not included in the measurement of segment adjusted EBITDA provided to the chief operating decision maker for purposes of assessing segment performance and decision making with respect to resource allocations. Therefore, we believe that adjusted EBITDA provides useful information to our investors regarding our performance and overall results of operations. Adjusted EBITDA and operating EBITDA are not intended to be performance measures that should be regarded as an alternative to, or more meaningful than, either operating income or net income as an indicator of operating performance or to cash flows from operating activities as a measure of liquidity. In addition, adjusted EBITDA and operating EBITDA are not intended to represent funds available for dividends, reinvestment or other discretionary uses, and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with GAAP. The adjusted EBITDA and operating EBITDA measures presented in thisForm 10-Qmay not be comparable to similarly titled measures presented by other companies, and may not be identical to corresponding measures used in our various agreements.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenue.  Total revenue increased $101.3 million, or 27%, to $477.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006 from $375.9 million for the comparable period in 2005. The increase was due to a 14.3% increase in Transaction Services revenue, a 31.5% increase in Credit Services revenue, and a 28.5% increase in Marketing Services revenue as follows:

 

 

 

Excess spread, which represents interest and late fees collected from cardholders, other trust related fees, fair value changes related to the interest-only strips and charge-offs, increased due to lower charge-offs and higher collected fees from cardholders. Recently enacted bankruptcy reform legislation caused a sharp increase in credit losses in the fourth quarter of 2005 and an offsetting benefit in the first quarter of this year.

 

 

Operating Expenses.  Total operating expenses, excluding depreciation, amortization and stock compensation expense, increased $56.0 million, or 19.5%, to $343.0 million during the three months ended March 31, 2006 from $287.0 million during the comparable period in 2005. Total adjusted EBITDA margin increased to 28.1% for the three months ended March 31, 2006 from 23.6% for the comparable period in 2005 due to increased margins across Transaction Services and Credit Services, offset by a slight decrease in margin for Marketing Services.

 

 

 

Operating Income.  Operating income increased $37.2 million, or 59.7%, to $99.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006 from $62.2 million during the comparable period in 2005. Operating income increased due to the revenue and expense factors discussed above.

 

Interest Expense.  Interest expense increased $5.7 million, or 209.2%, to $8.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006 from $2.8 million for the comparable period in 2005. Interest on certificates of deposit increased $3.2 million due to an increase in on-balance sheet receivables of approximately $250 million. Core debt interest expense increased $3.4 million as a result of our stock repurchase program and the acquisition of ICOM.

 

Taxes.  Income tax expense increased $12.1 million to $34.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006 from $22.3 million in 2005 due to an increase in taxable income. Our effective tax rate increased to 37.9% in 2006 compared to 37.5% in 2005.

 

Our delinquency and net charge-off rates reflect, among other factors, the credit risk of our private label credit card receivables, the average age of our various private label credit card account portfolios, the success of our collection and recovery efforts, and general economic conditions. The average age of our private label credit card portfolio affects the stability of delinquency and loss rates of the portfolio. We continue to focus our resources on refining our credit underwriting standards for new accounts and on collections and post charge-off recovery efforts to minimize net losses.

 

An older private label credit card portfolio generally drives a more stable performance in the portfolio. At March 31, 2006, 58.5% of securitized accounts with balances and 62.4% of securitized receivables were for accounts with origination dates greater than 24 months old.

 

Delinquencies.  A credit card account is contractually delinquent if we do not receive the minimum payment by the specified due date on the cardholder’s statement. It is our policy to continue to accrue interest and fee income on all credit card accounts, except in limited circumstances, until the account balance and all related interest and other fees are charged off or paid beyond 90 days delinquent. When an account becomes delinquent, we print a message on the cardholder’s billing statement requesting payment. After an account becomes 30 days past due, a proprietary collection scoring algorithm automatically scores the risk of the account rolling to a more delinquent status. The collection system then recommends a collection strategy for the past due account based on the collection score and account balance and dictates the contact schedule and collections priority for the account. If we are unable to make a collection after exhausting all in-house efforts, we engage collection agencies and outside attorneys to continue those efforts.

 

The following table presents the delinquency trends of our managed credit card portfolio:

 

 

Net Charge-Offs.  Net charge-offs comprise the principal amount of losses from cardholders unwilling or unable to pay their account balances, as well as bankrupt and deceased cardholders, less current period recoveries. Net charge-offs exclude accrued finance charges and fees. The following table presents our net charge-offs for the periods indicated on a managed basis. Average managed receivables represents the average balance of the cardholder receivables at the beginning of each month in the period indicated.

 

 

Operating Activities.  We have historically generated cash flows from operations, although that amount may vary based on fluctuations in working capital and the timing of merchant settlement activity. Our operating cash flow is seasonal, with cash utilization peaking at the end of December due to increased activity in our Credit Services segment related to holiday retail sales.

 

 

We generated cash flow from operating activities before changes in merchant settlement activity of $56.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006 as compared to $86.6 million for the comparable period in 2005. The decrease in operating cash flows before changes in merchant settlement activity is related to unfavorable working capital movements offset in part by improved operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2006. Merchant settlement activity fluctuates significantly depending on the day in which the quarter ends. We utilize our cash flow from operations for ongoing business operations, acquisitions and capital expenditures.

 

Investing Activities.  Cash provided by investing activities was $46.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006 compared to $83.3 million of cash provided for the comparable period in 2005. Significant components of investing activities are as follows:

 

 

Financing Activities.  Cash used by financing activities was $3.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006 compared to a use of cash of $91.6 million in the comparable period in 2005. Our financing activities during the three months ended March 31, 2006 relate primarily to borrowings and repayments of debt and the repurchase of 670,200 shares of our common stock and the issuance and repayment of certificates of deposit.

 

Liquidity Sources.  In addition to cash generated from operating activities, we have four main sources of liquidity: securitization program, certificates of deposit issued by World Financial Network National Bank and World Financial Capital Bank, our credit facilities and issuances of equity securities. We believe that internally generated funds and existing sources of liquidity are sufficient to meet current and anticipated financing requirements during the next 12 months.

Securitization Program and Off-Balance Sheet Transactions.  Since January 1996, we have sold, sometimes through WFN Credit Company, LLC and WFN Funding Company II, LLC, substantially all of the credit card receivables owned by our credit card bank subsidiary, World Financial Network National Bank, to World Financial Network Credit Card Master Trust, World Financial Network Credit Card Master Note Trust, World Financial Network Credit Card Master Trust II and World Financial Network Credit Card Master Trust III, which we refer to as the WFN Trusts, as part of our securitization program. This securitization program is the primary vehicle through which we finance our private label credit card receivables.

 

In April 2006, World Financial Network Credit Card Master Note Trust issued $395.0 million of Class ASeries 2006-Aasset backed notes that have an interest rate not to exceed one-month LIBOR plus 0.13% per year and that will mature in April 2013, $18.8 million of Class MSeries 2006-Aasset backed notes that have an interest rate not to exceed one-month LIBOR plus 0.21% per year that will mature in April 2013, $23.8 million of Class BSeries 2006-Aasset backed notes that have an interest rate not to exceed one-month LIBOR plus 0.35% per year that will mature in April 2013 and $62.5 million of Class CSeries 2006-Aasset backed notes that have an interest rate not to exceed one-month LIBOR plus 0.60% per year that will mature in April 2013.

 

The notes are rated AAA through BBB, or its equivalent, by each of Standard and Poor’s, Moody’s, and Fitch Ratings. In connection with the transaction, World Financial Network Credit Card Master Note Trust also entered into interest rate swaps that effectively fix the interest rate on the notes starting at 5.53% over the seven-year term of the interest rate swaps.

 

As of March 31, 2006, the WFN Trusts had over $3.1 billion of securitized credit card receivables. Securitizations require credit enhancements in the form of cash, spread deposits and additional receivables. The credit enhancement is principally based on the outstanding balances of the series issued by the WFN Trusts and by the performance of the private label credit cards in the securitization trust. During the period from November to January, the WFN Trusts are required to maintain a credit enhancement level of between 6% and 10% of securitized credit card receivables. Certain of the WFN Trusts are required to maintain a level of between 4% and 9% for the remainder of the year.

 

If World Financial Network National Bank were not able to regularly securitize the receivables it originates, our ability to grow or even maintain our credit services business would be materially impaired as we would be severely limited in our financing ability. World Financial Network National Bank’s ability to effect securitization transactions is impacted by the following factors, some of which are beyond our control:

 

 

We believe that the conditions to securitize private label receivables are favorable for us. We plan to continue using our securitization program as our primary financing vehicle.

 

Once World Financial Network National Bank securitizes receivables, the agreement governing the transaction contains covenants that address the receivables’ performance and the continued solvency of the retailer where the underlying sales were generated. In the event one of those or other similar covenants is breached, an early amortization event could be declared, in which case the trustee for the securitization trust would retain World Financial Network National Bank’s interest in the related receivables, along with the excess interest income that would normally be paid to World Financial Network National Bank, until such time as the securitization investors are fully repaid. The occurrence of an early amortization event would significantly limit, or even negate, our ability to securitize additional receivables.

 

Certificates of Deposit.  We utilize certificates of deposit to finance the operating activities and fund securitization enhancement requirements of our credit card bank subsidiaries, World Financial Network

National Bank and World Financial Capital Bank. World Financial Network National Bank and World Financial Capital Bank issue certificates of deposit in denominations of $100,000 in various maturities ranging between three months and two years and with effective annual fixed rates ranging from 4.2% to 5.0%. As of March 31, 2006, we had $278.2 million of certificates of deposit outstanding. Certificate of deposit borrowings are subject to regulatory capital requirements.

 

Credit Facilities.  During January 2006, the Company entered into an additional credit agreement to increase its borrowing capacity by an incremental $300.0 million. The principal amount of all outstanding loans under this credit agreement, together with any accrued but unpaid interest, are due and payable on June 30, 2006, unless otherwise paid earlier pursuant to the terms of the credit agreement. This credit agreement includes usual and customary negative covenants for credit agreements of this type. Payment of amounts due under this credit agreement are secured by guaranties, pledges of the ownership interests of certain of the Company’s subsidiaries and pledges of certain intercompany promissory notes. On January 5, 2006, the Company borrowed $300.0 million under this credit agreement, which it is using for general corporate purposes, including other debt repayment, repurchases of its common stock in connection with its stock repurchase program, mergers and acquisitions, and working capital expenditures. The Company anticipates refinancing this facility prior to June 30, 2006. On April 6, 2006, the Company amended its364-dayfacility to extend the maturity date from April 6, 2006 to April 5, 2007.

 

Advances under all four of our credit facilities are in the form of either base rate loans or Eurodollar loans. The interest rate on base rate loans fluctuates based upon the higher of (1) the interest rate announced by the administrative agent as its “prime rate” and (2) the Federal funds rate plus 0.5%, in each case with no additional margin. The interest rate on Eurodollar loans fluctuates based upon the rate at which Eurodollar deposits in the London interbank market are quoted plus a margin of 0.5% to 1.0% based upon the ratio of total debt under the credit facilities to consolidated Operating EBITDA, as each term is defined in the credit facilities. All of our credit facilities are secured by pledges of stock of certain of the Company’s subsidiaries and pledges of certain intercompany promissory notes.

 

At March 31, 2006, we had borrowings of $547.1 million outstanding under our other three credit facilities (with an average interest rate of 6.0%), no letters of credit outstanding, and we had available unused borrowing capacity of approximately $267.9 million. These credit facilities limit our aggregate outstanding letters of credit to $50.0 million.

 

The Company utilizes its credit facilities and excess cash flows from operations to support its acquisition strategy and to fund working capital and capital expenditures. The Company was in compliance with its covenants under our credit facilities at March 31, 2006.

 

In February 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 155 (“SFAS No. 155”), “Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments” which amends Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133 (“SFAS No. 133”), “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 140 (“SFAS No. 140”), “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities.” SFAS No. 155 simplifies the accounting for certain derivatives embedded in other financial instruments by allowing them to be accounted for as a whole if the holder elects to account for the whole instrument on a fair value basis. SFAS No. 155 also clarifies and amends certain other provisions of SFAS No. 133 and SFAS No. 140. SFAS No. 155 is effective for all financial instruments acquired, issued or subject to a remeasurement event occurring in fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2006. Earlier adoption is permitted, provided we have not yet issued financial statements, including for interim periods, for that fiscal year. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 155 to have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

 

In March 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 156, “Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets” (“SFAS No. 156”). SFAS No. 156 amends SFAS No. 140 with respect to the accounting for separately-recognized servicing assets and liabilities. SFAS No. 156 addresses the recognition and measurement of separately-recognized servicing assets and liabilities and provides an approach to simplify efforts to obtain hedge-like (offset) accounting. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2006. Earlier adoption is permitted, provided we have not yet issued financial statements, including for interim periods, for that fiscal year. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 156 to have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

 

 

There has been no material change from our Annual Report onForm 10-K/Afor the year ended December 31, 2005 related to our exposure to market risk from off-balance sheet risk, interest rate risk, credit risk, and redemption reward risk.

 

Foreign Currency Exchange Risk.  We are exposed to fluctuations in the exchange rate between the U.S. and the Canadian dollar through our significant Canadian operations. We do not hedge our net investment exposure in our Canadian subsidiary.

 

 

 

As of March 31, 2006, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant toRule 13a-15of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that as of March 31, 2006, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective. Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information we are required to disclose in such reports is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

 

Our evaluation of and conclusion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005 did not include the internal controls of Epsilon Interactive and ICOM because of the timing of these acquisitions, which were completed in September 2005 and February 2006, respectively. As of December 31, 2005, these entities constituted $147.7 million of total assets and an immaterial amount of revenues and net income for the year then ended. In the fourth quarter of 2006, we will expand our evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal controls over financial reporting to include Epsilon Interactive. As part of our integration of Epsilon Interactive, we are in the process of converting their legacy general ledger platform to the platform used by our existing business units.

 

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

ThisForm 10-Qand the documents incorporated by reference herein contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Such statements may use words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “predict,” “project” and similar expressions as they relate to us or our management. When we make forward-looking statements, we are basing them on our management’s beliefs and assumptions, using information currently available to us. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, these forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions, including those discussed in the “Risk Factors” section in our Annual Report onForm 10-K/Afor the year ended December 31, 2005.

 

If one or more of these or other risks or uncertainties materialize, or if our underlying assumptions prove to be incorrect, actual results may vary materially from what we projected. Any forward-looking statements contained in this quarterly report reflect our current views with respect to future events and are subject to these and other risks, uncertainties and assumptions relating to our operations, results of operations, growth strategy and liquidity. We have no intention, and disclaim any obligation, to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future results or otherwise.

 

From time to time, we are involved in various claims and lawsuits arising in the ordinary course of our business that we believe will not have a material adverse affect on our business or financial condition, including claims and lawsuits alleging breaches of contractual obligations.

 

There have been no material changes to the Risk Factors previously disclosed in our Annual Report onForm 10-K/Afor the year ended December 31, 2005.

 

On June 8, 2005, our Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program to acquire up to an aggregate of $80.0 million of our outstanding common stock through June 2006. On October 27, 2005, our Board of Directors authorized a new stock repurchase program to acquire up to an additional $220.0 million of our outstanding common stock through October 2006. As of March 31, 2006, we have repurchased 4,612,300 shares of our common stock for approximately $178.4 million under these programs. Additionally, the administrator of our 401(k) and Retirement Savings Plan purchased shares of our common stock for the benefit of the employees who participated in that portion of the plan during the first quarter of 2006.

 

The following table presents information with respect to those purchases of our common stock made during the three months ended March 31, 2006: