Distribution Solutions Group - 10-K annual report

“Safe Harbor” Statement under the Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995: This Annual Report onForm 10-Kcontains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that involve risks and uncertainties. The terms “may,” “should,” “could,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “continues,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “objective,” “plan,” “potential,” “project” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. These statements are based on management’s current expectations, intentions or beliefs and are subject to a number of factors, assumptions and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences or that might otherwise impact the business include the risk factors set forth in Item 1A of thisForm 10-K.

The Company undertakes no obligation to update any such factor or to publicly announce the results of any revisions to any forward-looking statements contained herein whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Lawson Products, Inc. (“Lawson”, the “Company”, “we” or “us”) was incorporated in Illinois in 1952, and reincorporated in Delaware in 1982. Lawson is a North American distributor and marketer of systems, services and products to the industrial, commercial, institutional, and governmental maintenance repair and operations (“MRO”) marketplace. The Company also manufactures, sells and distributes production and specialized component parts to the original equipment marketplace (“OEM”) including the automotive, appliance, aerospace, construction, and transportation industries. Please see Note O “Segment Reporting” in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, included elsewhere in this Annual Report onForm 10-K,for further information regarding financial results related to the Company’s geographical and business segments. (Such information is incorporated herein by reference.)

The MRO industry consists of companies that buy and stock products in bulk and supply these products to customers on an as needed basis. The customer benefits from lower costs and convenience of ordering. We estimate the MRO industry in North America to exceed $100 billion in revenues.

We encounter intense competition from several national distributors and manufacturers and a large number of regional and local distributors. Some competitors have greater financial and personnel resources, handle more extensive lines of merchandise, operate larger facilities and price some merchandise more competitively than we do. We compete for business delivering on our proposition of vendor managed inventory, technical expertise and highly engineered products.

We participate in the MRO industry through our Lawson Products business unit and through our Rutland Tools subsidiary (“Rutland”) which together represented 83% of our overall net sales for the year ended December 31, 2008.

The majority of our sales are generated through a network of approximately 1,500 independent sales agents. These agents deliver value to the customer by offering vendor managed inventory, technical expertise and highly engineered products. Sales agents receive education in the best uses of our products enabling them to provide solutions customized to our customers needs. This includeson-sitevisits to help manage customer inventories, introducing cost savings and improving their profitability. Regular inventory analysis and replenishment is conducted to prevent unnecessary purchases and unplanned downtime. Additionally, we provide customized storage systems for improved organization and a more efficient workflow. Product demonstrations that can improve our customers’ productivity are regularly given by our agents.

We distribute printed catalogs to two primary markets. One is the retail market where business is done with the end user of the product. The other is the wholesale market where the distributor resells our product to an end customer. In 2008, we delivered printed catalogs to approximately 70,000 retail customers and approximately 62,000 wholesale customers. We also have showrooms located in Whittier, California; City of Industry, California; San Jose, California; Santa Ana, California; Chatsworth, California; Phoenix, Arizona; and Houston, Texas.

We receive product orders in various ways. Customers can place orders with our customer service team via fax or phone, orders can be placed directly through the on-line catalog on our web site and agents enter orders directly into an electronic ordering system.

Our engineering department provides technical support as part of our value proposition for our extensive product line andon-siteproblem solving. Material Safety Data Sheets are maintained electronically and are available to our customers seven days a week, 24 hours a day. Additionally, product certifications and material test

We sell products in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and Canada. An important factor in attracting and retaining customers is our ability to process orders promptly. We normally ship to customers within one to two days of order placement. This rapid shipment is facilitated by automated order entry and inventory control systems. Products are stocked in and processed from strategically placed general distribution centers in Des Plaines, Illinois; Addison, Illinois; Vernon Hills, Illinois; Reno, Nevada; Fairfield, New Jersey; Dallas, Texas; Suwanee, Georgia; and Mississauga, Ontario.

We carry a significant amount of inventories to ensure product availability and rapid processing of customer orders. We depend on accurate forecasting of customer demand to establish the proper level of inventory for each product. Inventory levels need to be sufficient to meet customer demand while avoiding the costs of stocking excess items. Technology is critical to provide management with timely information related to our current inventory on hand in relation to customer demand, vendor pricing and purchase lead times to order the replenishment of the optimal number of parts at the proper time at the best price. We are seeking to improve and upgrade the quality of our information technology to maximize the efficiency of our supply chain.

We offer approximately 240,000 different products for sale of which approximately 180,000 products are maintained in inventory. Sales percentages by broad categories of our product mix are as follows:

Substantially all of our products are manufactured by others, purchased in bulk and repackaged in smaller quantities for sale to our customers. During 2008, our Lawson Products business unit purchased products from over 1,100 suppliers and our Rutland business unit purchased products from approximately 600 suppliers. We generally do not engage in long-term or fixed-price contracts. No single supplier accounted for more than three percent of our purchases in 2008 and we believe that the loss of any single supplier would not significantly affect our operations.

We actively participate in the design and development of products with our manufacturers. Technology has helped us to develop new items that are application specific. We review applications and recommend alternative products that could prove beneficial to the customer. Our quality control department tests our product offerings to assure they meet our specifications. We also conduct failure analysis and recommend solutions to help customers maximize product performance and avoid costly product failures. To promote brand loyalty, we sell products using various private labels and tradenames including Lawson Products, Kent Automotive, Cronatron, and Drummond, among others.

Our customers include a wide range of purchasers of industrial supply products from small repair shops to large national and governmental accounts. Our customers operate in a wide variety of industries including

During 2008, our Lawson Products business unit sold products to approximately 140,000 customers and our Rutland business unit sold products to approximately 30,000 customers. No customer accounted for more than two percent of net sales. In 2008, 94% of our net sales came from customers in the United States and 6% came from customers in Canada.

Two of our subsidiaries, Assembly Component Systems (“ACS”) and Automatic Screw Machine Parts Company (“ASMP”) compete in the OEM marketplace. The OEM marketplace generally consists of large manufacturing companies with multiple supply chain needs. ACS and ASMP accounted for 13% and 4% of the Company’s net sales for the year ended December 31, 2008.

ACS specializes in providing OEM manufacturers withjust-in-timedelivery of fasteners, components and fittings to maximize the efficiency of the customers’ supply chain. ACS seeks long-term agreements with companies to identify product needs and parameters of use, offer engineering expertise, provide product sourcing and manage inventory replenishment. Sales support and dedicated warehousing is provided, enabling partnered companies to focus on manufacturing operations while affording them a reduction in financial obligations associated with inventory housing and usage. ACS operates a distribution network that includes Des Plaines, Illinois; Lenexa, Kansas; Cincinnati, Ohio; and Memphis, Tennessee. Inventory supply rooms staffed by dedicated ACS sales personnel located close to, or within a company’s operating space, are used to facilitate the selection and transfer of goods that are called for during a production schedule. Additional sales support is available through sales calls, special needs requests, and pre-determined replenishment schedules.

ASMP manufactures and distributes components, fasteners and fittings for use by OEM manufacturers. Based in Decatur, Alabama, ASMP manufactures components specific to the customer’s production needs including various nondependent or interdependent components. ASMP seeks to obtain long-term commitments to enable proper support of the customers’ supply chain. ASMP manufactures products developed for high strength critical applications and also sources externally produced items if applications call for such goods.

As of December 31, 2008, we employed approximately 1,350 full time workers, consisting of approximately 340 sales and marketing employees, 760 operations and distribution employees and 250 management and administrative staff. Approximately 12% of our workforce is represented by four collective bargaining agreements. We believe that our relations with our employees and their collective bargaining organizations are good.

Additionally, sales in our MRO segment are made primarily through a network of approximately 1,500 independent sales agents. Independent sales agents are compensated on a commission only basis and are responsible for repayment of commissions on any uncollectible accounts.

We file or furnish annual reports onForm 10-K,quarterly reports onForm 10-Q,current reports onForm 8-Kand file or furnish amendments to those reports pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act and Section 16 reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The public can obtain copies of these materials by visiting the Commission’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington DC 20549, by accessing the SEC’s website athttp://www.sec.gov.In addition, as soon as reasonably practicable after such materials are filed with or furnished to the Commission, we make copies available to the public free of charge on or through our website at www.lawsonproducts.com. Information on our website is not incorporated by reference into this report.

The executive officers of Lawson as of December 31, 2008 were as follows.

Biographical information for the past five years relating to each of our executive officers is set forth below.

Mr. Neri was elected Chief Executive Officer in April 2007. Mr. Neri was elected to the Board of Directors in December 2007. Mr. Neri was elected President and Chief Operating Officer in January 2007. Mr. Neri was elected Executive Vice President, Finance, Planning and Corporate Development; Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer in 2004. Mr. Neri joined the Company in October 2003 as Executive Vice President, Finance and Corporate Planning.

Mr. Blanchard was elected Chief Financial Officer effective June 30, 2008. Mr. Blanchard has been a partner in the executive services firm Tatum, LLC (“Tatum”) since 2006, where he has served as Interim Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer for Dura Automotive Systems, Inc., as Senior Financial Officer for Hyperfeed Technologies, Inc. and in a financial consultation role for Zimmer Holdings, Inc. Mr. Blanchard served from 1999 to 2006 in various management positions with Florsheim Group Inc., including as President and Chief Financial Officer, Vice President, Finance and Vice President and Controller. Florsheim Group Inc. filed a petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code on March 4, 2002.

Mr. Jenkins was elected Executive Vice President; Secretary and General Counsel in 2004. From 2000 to 2003 Mr. Jenkins served as Secretary and Corporate Counsel of the Company.

Mr. Dochelli was elected Executive Vice President Sales and Marketing effective April 2008. Previously, Mr. Dochelli served as Executive Vice President, North America Contract Sales for OfficeMax from 2007 until 2008, Executive Vice President of U.S. Operations for OfficeMax/Boise Cascade Office Solutions from 2005 to 2007 and in various other management positions with OfficeMax/Boise Cascade Office Solutions from 1987 to 2005.

Mr. Holmes was elected Vice President and Treasurer effective January 2006. From 2001 through 2005 Mr. Holmes was Vice President and Assistant Treasurer of the Company.

Mr. Howley was elected Senior Vice President Strategic Business Development effective April 2008. Mr. Howley served as Chief Marketing Officer from December 2005 until May 2008. From August 2002 through December 2005, he was Director of Strategic Business Development with Home Depot Supply.

Ms. Russell was elected Senior Vice President Operations and Supply Chain Management in August 2007. Ms. Russell served as Chief Ethics and Compliance Officer from April 2006 until August 2007 and in a consulting capacity from November 2005 through March 2006. Prior to this Ms. Russell held the role of Vice President of Operations at Associated Materials from 2001 until 2005.

Ms. Schopp was elected Senior Vice President, Human Resources in 2007. Prior to this Ms. Schopp held the role of Vice President, Human Resources at ConAgra Foods, Inc. from 2003 until 2006.

In addition to the other information in this Annual Report onForm 10-Kfor the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, the following factors should be considered in evaluating Lawson’s business. Our operating results depend upon many factors and are subject to various risks and uncertainties. The material risks and uncertainties known to us which may cause the operating results to vary from anticipated results or which may negatively affect our operating results are as follows:

In late 2007, the U.S. and world economies entered into a severe economic recession due to the effects of the subprime lending crisis, general credit market crisis, collateral effects on the finance and banking industries, volatile energy and commodity costs, concerns about inflation, slower economic activity, decreased consumer confidence, reduced corporate profits and capital spending, adverse business conditions and liquidity concerns. These conditions make it difficult for our customers and us to accurately forecast and plan future business activities, and have caused U.S. and foreign businesses to slow spending on products throughout our industry, which adversely impacts our revenues and our ability to manage inventory levels, collect customer receivables and ultimately our profitability. We cannot predict the duration of the recession or the timing or strength of a subsequent economic recovery. Additionally, our stock price could decrease if investors have concerns that our business, financial condition, results of operations and capital requirements will be negatively impacted by a continued worldwide recession. A decrease in our stock price reduces the market value of the Company compared to the book value of our net assets, which may lead to further impairment of our assets.

We entered into a Deferred Prosecution Agreement (the “DPA”) in August 2008 with the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Illinois (the “U.S. Attorney’s Office), which provides for the payment of $30.0 million in penalties to resolve our liability for the actions of our representatives in improperly providing gifts or awards to purchasing agents through our then-existing customer loyalty programs. The signing of the DPA may negatively affect our ability to do business with certain customers (both government and non-government customers). In addition, under the terms of the DPA, if it is determined that we deliberately gave false, incomplete or misleading information under the DPA or have committed any federal crimes subsequent to the DPA, or otherwise knowingly, intentionally, and materially violated any provision of the DPA, we may be subject to prosecution for any federal criminal violation of which the U.S. Attorney’s Office has knowledge. We cannot predict the impact, if any, of the signing of the DPA on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and stock price.

Our business strategy requires us to carry a significant amount of inventory in order to meet rapid processing of customer orders. If our inventory forecasting and production planning processes result in inventory levels exceeding the levels demanded by customers, our operating results could be adversely affected due to costs of carrying the inventory and additional inventory write-downs for excess and obsolete inventory.

Our ability to rapidly process customer orders is an integral component of our overall business strategy. Disruptions at transportation centers or shipping ports, due to events such as severe weather or labor interruptions or other events, affect both our ability to maintain core products in inventory and deliver products to our customers on a

From time to time, we have experienced changes in product mix and inventory costs. When our product mix changes, there can be no assurance that we will be able to maintain our historical gross profit margins. Changes in our customers, product mix, or the volume of orders could cause our gross profit margin percentage to decline.

Increases in the cost of raw materials used in our products (e.g., steel) and energy costs raise the production costs of our vendors. Those vendors typically look to pass the higher costs along to us through price increases. If we are unable to fully pass these increased prices and costs through to our customers or to modify our activities, the impact would have an adverse effect on our operating profit margins.

We depend on our information systems to process orders, to manage inventory and accounts receivable collections, to purchase, sell and ship products, to maintain cost-effective operations, and to service customers. Disruptions in the operation of information systems can occur due to a variety of factors including power outages, computer bugs and human error. Any disruption in the operation of our information systems whether over a short or an extended period of time or affecting one or multiple distribution centers could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

As of January 31, 2009, members of the Port family collectively beneficially owned 55.3% of the outstanding shares of common stock. This share ownership would permit these stockholders, if they chose to act together, to exert significant influence over the outcome of stockholder votes, including votes concerning the election of directors, by-law amendments, possible mergers, corporate control contests and other significant corporate transactions. The interests of the Port family may differ from those of other stockholders.

Our marketplace, although consolidating, still includes large, fragmented industries that are highly competitive. We believe that customers and competitors may continue to consolidate over the next few years, which may make the industry even more competitive. Our current or future competitors include companies with similar or greater market presence, name recognition, and financial, marketing, and other resources, and we believe they will continue to challenge the marketplace with their product selection, financial resources, and services.

We anticipate that we may, from time to time, selectively acquire additional businesses or assets. Acquisitions are accompanied by risks, such as potential exposure to unknown liabilities of acquired companies and the possible loss of key employees and customers of the acquired business. In addition, we may not obtain the expected benefits or cost savings from acquisitions. Acquisitions are subject to risks associated with financing the acquisition and integrating the operations and personnel of the acquired businesses or assets. If any of these risks materialize, they may result in disruptions to our business and the diversion of management time and attention, which could increase the costs of operating our existing or acquired businesses or negate the expected benefits of the acquisitions.

We sell to numerous government and tax supported entities. Any situation that impacts these funded entities or our ability to sell to these entities could have a material adverse effect on the Company.

None.

Our headquarters is located in Des Plaines, Illinois and we conduct our business from owned or leased facilities at the following locations.

The location and operation of our facilities is frequently reviewed to determine whether they meet the strategic needs of our business. We believe that our current facilities are adequate to meet our needs.

There is no material pending litigation to which the Company, or any of its subsidiaries, is a party or to which any of their property is subject.

In December 2005, the FBI executed a search warrant for records at the Company’s offices and informed the Company that it was conducting an investigation as to whether any of the Company’s representatives improperly provided gifts or awards to purchasing agents (including government purchasing agents) through the Company’s customer loyalty programs (the “investigation”). The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Illinois (the “U.S. Attorney’s Office”) subsequently issued a subpoena for documents in connection with the investigation.

In April 2007, thirteen people, including seven former sales agents of the Company, were indicted on federal criminal charges, including mail fraud, in connection with the investigation. These indictments alleged that, under the Company’s customer loyalty programs, sales agents would provide cash gift certificates to individuals purchasing Company merchandise on behalf of their employers as a way to increase their commissions and prices paid by customers. All of the cases involved commissioned sales agents of the Company. All seven of the indicted former sales agents have entered guilty pleas to federal criminal charges.

On August 11, 2008, in connection with the investigation, the Company entered into a Deferred Prosecution Agreement (the “DPA”) with the U.S. Attorney’s Office. An additional three people, including a former sales manager and a former sales agent were indicted on August 11, 2008 and have since pled guilty. Under the terms of the DPA, the U.S. Attorney’s Office filed a one count criminal Information charging the Company with mail fraud in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, but agreed to defer prosecution of such charge for three years. If the Company abides by the terms and conditions of the DPA, the U.S. Attorney’s Office will seek dismissal with prejudice of the Information within 30 days of the expiration of the three-year period.

Pursuant to the DPA, the Company agreed to a $30.0 million penalty, which includes $0.8 million of restitution, and recorded a charge of $30.0 million in the second quarter of 2008. The penalty is payable in three equal installments. The first $10.0 million payment was made in August 2008. The remaining $10.0 million payments are due in August 2009 and in August 2010. If a controlling interest in the Company is sold, any unpaid amounts shall due at the closing of the sale.

Under the DPA, the Company agreed to make restitution payments to certain customers that employed individuals who received over ten thousand dollars in payments through the Winners Choice incentive program, that employed individuals who have been or later are convicted of mail fraud as a result of Winners Choice payments, or that purchased Company merchandise from sales agents who have been or later are convicted of mail fraud for providing checks to the customer’s employees. Restitution payments were made to these customers from the Company’s first installment payment.

In conjunction with the Company’s internal investigation, several customer loyalty programs were terminated because the Company believes that these programs provided or had the potential of providing promotional considerations, such as gifts and awards, to purchasing agents that the Company deemed inappropriate. The Company has modified another customer loyalty program to limit the amount and nature of customer gifts distributed under the program. In addition, twenty-three independent agents have been terminated, a number have resigned and the Company has terminated four employees. The Company has also implemented a compliance and ethics program to prevent future abuses. Under the terms of the DPA, the Company agreed to continue to implement its compliance and ethics program.

No matter was submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this Report.

The Company’s Common Stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol of “LAWS.” The following table sets forth the high and low closing sale prices as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market along with cash dividends declared for each outstanding share during the last two years for the periods presented.

On March 5, 2009 the closing sales price of our common stock was $14.33 and the number of stockholders of record was 609.

Set forth below is a line graph comparing the yearly change in the cumulative total stockholder return on the Company’s common stock against the cumulative total return of the S&P SmallCap 600 Index and a peer group (the “Peer Group”) of the Company for the five prior years. The Peer Group consists of Barnes Group Inc., Fastenal Company and MSC Industrial Direct. The Company believes that the Peer Group is representative of the markets it services in terms of product sales and customers. The chart below represents the cumulative return of a hypothetical $100 invested on December 31, 2003 in stock or index, including reinvestment of dividends.

The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company and Notes thereto included elsewhere in this Annual Report. The income statement data and balance sheet data are for, and as of the end of each of, the years in the five-year period ended December 31, 2008, and are derived from the audited Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company.

The two principal factors affecting our 2008 results were the one-time $30.0 million DPA settlement penalty and the global economic recession and contraction in the credit markets that led to decreased customer demand throughout our industry. The duration of the recession is uncertain and industry demand is expected to continue to decline and create downward pressure on sales volume in 2009. Despite the negative effects of the economy, we were able to take steps to improve our financial condition during 2008. Operationally, we made progress in integrating previously separate businesses to allow our customers access to an expanded range of products from a single point of contact. We were able to generate cash by reducing our working capital requirements primarily through initiatives taken to improve inventory management. Additionally, the settlement with the United States Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Illinois substantially brings to a close the uncertainty created by the investigation initiated in 2005.

Sales and gross profit results for the years ending December 31, 2008 and 2007 were as follows:

The 5.3% decrease in net sales to $485.2 million in 2008 compared to $512.5 million in 2007 resulted from decreases in both the MRO and OEM segments as our businesses were negatively impacted by the slowdown in the global economy. Net sales of our MRO business experienced a severe decline of 14.3% in the fourth quarter of 2008 compared to 2007 as our customers, affected by overall weakness in the economy and a much more restrictive credit environment, reduced their purchasing requirements. We expect the demand level to continue to deteriorate until the credit markets recover and the global economic environment improves. Sales were also negatively impacted by a net reduction of over 100 sales agents in 2008 compared to 2007. Net sales of our OEM segment decreased $1.4 million due to customer losses and the economic slowdown in the fourth quarter, partially offset by increased sales generated from some of our current customers.

Gross profit decreased $24.8 million to $279.0 million in 2008 primarily due to the reduction in net sales and a decline of 1.8 percentage points as a percent of sales. The decline was primarily attributable to higher product and commodity costs.

Selling, general and administrative costs declined by 3.5% to $256.0 million in 2008 compared to $265.3 million in 2007 primarily due to decreases in sales commissions and compensation expenses. Selling, general and administrative costs as a percent of sales increased 1.0 percentage points to 52.8% in 2008 as fixed costs were not reduced in direct proportion to the overall decrease in net sales.

Settlement costs relate to the investigation by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Illinois as to whether our sales representatives provided improper gifts or awards to purchasing agents (including government purchasing agents) through our customer loyalty programs. In August 2008, in connection with the investigation, we entered into the DPA with the U.S. Attorney’s Office and agreed to pay a $30.0 million penalty. In addition to the penalty, we incurred legal and other expenses of $1.7 million in 2008 and $5.8 million in 2007 in connection with the investigation.

In 2008, the Company recorded $9.3 million of severance and other charges. Of this amount, $5.4 million related to severance costs associated with the departure of certain executives and operational efficiency improvement initiatives and $3.9 million related to unclaimed property liabilities primarily associated with years prior to 2003. During 2007, the Company implemented several initiatives designed to improve operating efficiencies. As a result of these initiatives, certain positions and departments were eliminated and restructured, resulting in $12.3 million of severance costs and other charges.

Annually, we assess the fair value of our goodwill for impairment. Our 2008 review resulted in a $2.3 million non-cash charge to reflect the impairment of goodwill recorded in our OEM segment related to ACS.

Other expense, net of $0.5 million in 2008 was relatively unchanged compared to 2007. A $0.2 million decrease in interest income was somewhat offset by a $0.1 million decrease in interest expense.

The effective tax rates for continuing operations for 2008 and 2007 were (30.7)% and 43.5%, respectively. The 2008 effective tax rate reflects the effect of $29.2 million related to the penalty under the DPA which was non-deductible and a $6.1 million non-deductible expense related to a decline in the cash value of life insurance. Excluding these items, the 2008 effective tax rate would have been 43.7%.

Sales and gross profit results for the years ending December 31, 2007 and 2006 were as follows:

The decrease in net sales to $512.5 million in 2007 compared to $514.3 million in 2006 resulted from decreases in both the MRO and OEM segments. The sales decrease for MRO businesses was primarily driven by lower sales of metalworking products due to order fulfillment problems encountered during the Reno, Nevada distribution facility expansion which was completed in December 2007. OEM sales decreased primarily due to the loss of some customer contracts.

Gross profit decreased $2.9 million to $303.8 million in 2007 compared to $306.7 million in 2006 primarily due to lower overall sales in 2007. As a percent of sales, gross profit declined by 0.3 percentage points to 59.3% in 2007 from

MRO gross profit margins declined slightly to 66.3% in 2007 from 66.5% in 2006. The gross profit margins for the OEM segment decreased 1.0 percentage points to 23.2% in 2007 from 24.2% in 2006, principally, due to increased product costs.

Selling, general and administrative costs declined by 4.8% to $265.3 million in 2007 compared to $278.5 million in 2006. As a percent of sales selling, general and administrative costs declined 2.4 percentage points to 51.8% in 2007 compared to 54.2% in 2006 primarily due to several initiatives undertaken during 2007 designed to improve operating efficiencies. The initiatives included the elimination of certain positions and restructuring of departments.

The Company incurred legal and other expenses of $5.8 million in 2007 and $3.2 million in 2006 in connection with the investigation by the U.S. Attorney’s office for the Northern District of Illinois related to whether Company sales representatives provided improper gifts or awards to purchasing agents (including government purchasing agents) through the Company’s customer loyalty programs.

The Company implemented several initiatives during 2007 designed to improve operating efficiencies. As a result of these initiatives, certain positions and departments were eliminated and restructured, resulting in $12.3 million of severance costs and other charges. The Company incurred $1.2 million of severance and other charges in 2006.

The Company recorded $0.4 million of other expense, net in 2007 compared to $2.2 million of other income, net, in 2006. The $2.6 million increase in other expense, net was primarily due to a higher average balance on our revolving line of credit which increased our interest expense in 2007 and lower foreign currency gains realized in 2007 compared to 2006.

The effective tax rates for continuing operations for 2007 and 2006 were 43.5% and 45.5%, respectively. The higher effective tax rate in 2006 primarily reflects adjustments related to the deductibility of the Company’s customer loyalty programs in its MRO business for tax years 2005, 2004 and 2003. Many of the customer loyalty and promotion programs in place for these years were terminated or replaced early in 2006.

Cash provided by operating activities for 2008, 2007 and 2006 was $15.7 million, $11.6 million and $19.9 million, respectively. The $4.1 million increase in 2008 compared to 2007 was primarily due to improved working capital utilization which was mostly offset by a decrease in net income and the $10.0 million payment related to the DPA penalty. The $8.3 million decline in 2007 cash provided by operating activities from 2006 was due primarily to lower net income and increases in inventories, prepaid expenses and miscellaneous receivables.

Working capital at December 31, 2008 and 2007 was $90.0 million and $99.1 million, respectively. The $9.1 million decrease in working capital is primarily attributable to a $10.4 million reduction in inventory, and a $10.3 million reduction in accounts receivable, partially offset by decreases in other liabilities. Initiatives taken to improve the inventory management process led to the lower inventory balance, while increased attention to collections and a reduction in sales during the fourth quarter led to the decrease in the amount of outstanding accounts receivable.

Cash used to purchase property plant and equipment was $3.5 million in 2008 compared to $17.7 million in 2007 and $5.3 million in 2006. 2007 included $12.1 million related to the Reno, Nevada facility expansion. Capital spending was reduced in 2008 in response to the economic downturn that began in the second half of 2008.

Financing activities included a $3.3 million paydown of our line of credit in 2008 compared to $11.0 million borrowed from the line of credit in 2007. The Company paid dividends of $6.8 million, $6.8 million and $7.2 million to shareholders of its common stock in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

In October 2006, we purchased 486,493 of our common shares in a “Dutch Auction” tender offer at a cost of $20.9 million. We did not purchase any of our common stock in 2008 or 2007. At December 31, 2008, 202,780 shares remained available for purchase pursuant to the 2004 authorization by our Board of Directors to purchase up to 500,000 shares of our common stock.

In November 2008, we entered into a First Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Credit Facility”) with Bank of America, N.A. The Credit Facility provides for a total commitment of $75 million in the form of revolving loans and letters of credit and matures on November 7, 2011. The interest rate for the Credit Facility bears interest at either, LIBOR plus 0.625%, or the prime rate minus 1.0%, as elected by us. The interest rate may be adjusted based on the ratio of consolidated total debt to EBITDA calculated on the basis of our most recent annual or quarterly financial statements. We had $7.7 million outstanding as of December 31, 2008 under the Credit Facility. The weighted average interest rate was 3.2% for the year ended December 31, 2008. The Credit Facility specifies certain financial covenants, including a fixed charge coverage and total debt to equity and minimum net worth calculations which must be met as of the end of each fiscal quarter. At December 31, 2008 we were in compliance with all covenants.

In March 2009 we amended the Credit Facility (the “Amended Credit Facility”), reducing the amount of the facility, adjusting the covenants and providing additional security to Bank of America, N.A. The Amended Credit Facility provides for a total commitment of $55 million. The maturity date remains November 7, 2011. The interest rate is LIBOR plus a margin of 2.0% to 3.5%, based on the ratio of total debt to EBITDA. The Amended Credit Facility contains covenants for adjusted EBITDA, as defined in the agreement, for each quarter through September 30, 2009. Commencing with the quarter ending December 31, 2009, additional covenants will be in place, including fixed charge coverage, total debt to equity and minimum net worth, as defined in the credit agreement. The Amended Credit Facility places a restriction on quarterly dividends of $0.26 million, or $1.04 million on an annual basis. The Amended Credit Facility is secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company, excluding real property and the capital stock of the Company’s subsidiaries, except for the stock of Lawson Canada. The Company paid an amendment fee of $0.1 million.

We believe that cash provided by operations and the $55 million revolving line of credit will be sufficient to fund our operating requirements, cash dividends and capital improvements for the upcoming fiscal year.

Contractual obligations that will require payment over future periods are as follows:

We have not entered into any off-balance sheet arrangements.

The Company has disclosed its significant accounting policies in Note B to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The following provides supplemental information to these accounting policies as well as information on the accounts requiring more significant estimates.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts Methodology — We evaluate the collectibility of accounts receivable based on a combination of factors. In circumstances where we are aware of a specific customer’s inability to meet its financial obligations (e.g., bankruptcy filings, substantial down-grading of credit ratings), a specific reserve for bad debts is recorded against amounts due to reduce the receivable to the amount we believe will be collected. For all other customers, we recognize reserves for bad debts based on our historical experience of bad debt write-offs as a percent of accounts receivable outstanding. If circumstances change (i.e., higher than expected defaults or an unexpected material adverse change in a major customer’s ability to meet its financial obligations), the estimates of the recoverability of amounts due to us could be revised by a material amount. In 2008, we recorded an allowance reserve equal to 3% of our trade receivables outstanding. A hypothetical change of one percent to our reserve allowance would have affected our annual doubtful accounts expense by approximately $0.5 million.

Inventory Reserves — We carry a significant amount of inventory as part of our strategy to fulfill the vast majority of our customers’ orders the same day received. However, this strategy increases the chance that portions of the inventory have lost value through obsolescence or becoming slow-moving or excess. To reduce inventory to a lower of cost or market value, we record a reserve for slow-moving and obsolete inventory. Obsolete and slow-moving inventory is monitored by examining reports of parts which have not been sold for extended periods. If experience or market conditions change, estimates of the reserves needed could be revised by a material amount. In 2008, we have an allowance reserve of $10.1 million equal to approximately 10% of our total inventory. A hypothetical change of one percent to our reserve allowance would have affected our selling, general and administrative expenses by approximately $1.0 million.

Income Taxes — Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the financial statements and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the

Through one of our subsidiaries, we distribute products in Canada. The functional currency of this subsidiary is the Canadian dollar which is translated into U.S. dollars when included in our consolidated financial statements. Therefore, we are exposed to market risk relating to the change in the value of the Canadian dollar relative to the U.S. dollar. A hypothetical 10% change in the Canadian foreign currency exchange rate would have affected our 2008 net sales by $3.2 million and total assets by $2.0 million.

We are exposed to investment market risk relating to changes in the value of the $18.0 million cash value of life insurance asset. This exposure is mostly offset by the $10.8 million value of the deferred compensation liability. A hypothetical 10% increase or decrease in the investment portfolios of both the cash value of life insurance asset and the deferred compensation liability would have affected our net income by $0.7 million.

At December 31, 2008, we had a $7.7 million outstanding balance on our revolving line of credit. The market risk of a one percentage point change in the LIBOR or Prime interest rates would be immaterial to our operating results.

We are exposed to market risk relating to increased commodity and energy costs affecting the production costs of our vendors. Those vendors typically look to pass their increased costs along to us and if we are unable to fully pass these costs through to our customers or to modify our activities, the impact would have an adverse effect on our operating profit margins.

The following information is presented in this item:

The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined inRules 13a-15(f)under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All internal control systems have inherent limitations, regardless of how well-designed they are. Therefore, an effective internal control over financial reporting system provides only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance with respect to the preparationand/orpresentation of the financial statements.

The Company’s management conducted an evaluation, with the participation of the Company’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer, of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008 based on the framework in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”).

Based on the evaluation described above and using the COSO criteria, the Company’s management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2008.

Ernst & Young LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, has audited the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report onForm 10-Kand, as part of its audit, has issued an attestation report, which is included herein, on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008.

We have audited Lawson Products, Inc.’s (the “Company”) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008 based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the “COSO” criteria). Lawson Products, Inc.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that the transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. In our opinion, Lawson Products, Inc. maintained in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Lawson Products, Inc. as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2008 and our report dated March 11, 2009 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Lawson Products, Inc. as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2008. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements and schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Lawson Products, Inc. at December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2008, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Lawson Products, Inc’s. internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated March 11, 2009, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.