Companies:
10,762
total market cap:
C$185.204 T
Sign In
๐บ๐ธ
EN
English
$ CAD
$
USD
๐บ๐ธ
โฌ
EUR
๐ช๐บ
โน
INR
๐ฎ๐ณ
ยฃ
GBP
๐ฌ๐ง
$
AUD
๐ฆ๐บ
$
NZD
๐ณ๐ฟ
$
HKD
๐ญ๐ฐ
$
SGD
๐ธ๐ฌ
Global ranking
Ranking by countries
America
๐บ๐ธ United States
๐จ๐ฆ Canada
๐ฒ๐ฝ Mexico
๐ง๐ท Brazil
๐จ๐ฑ Chile
Europe
๐ช๐บ European Union
๐ฉ๐ช Germany
๐ฌ๐ง United Kingdom
๐ซ๐ท France
๐ช๐ธ Spain
๐ณ๐ฑ Netherlands
๐ธ๐ช Sweden
๐ฎ๐น Italy
๐จ๐ญ Switzerland
๐ต๐ฑ Poland
๐ซ๐ฎ Finland
Asia
๐จ๐ณ China
๐ฏ๐ต Japan
๐ฐ๐ท South Korea
๐ญ๐ฐ Hong Kong
๐ธ๐ฌ Singapore
๐ฎ๐ฉ Indonesia
๐ฎ๐ณ India
๐ฒ๐พ Malaysia
๐น๐ผ Taiwan
๐น๐ญ Thailand
๐ป๐ณ Vietnam
Others
๐ฆ๐บ Australia
๐ณ๐ฟ New Zealand
๐ฎ๐ฑ Israel
๐ธ๐ฆ Saudi Arabia
๐น๐ท Turkey
๐ท๐บ Russia
๐ฟ๐ฆ South Africa
>> All Countries
Ranking by categories
๐ All assets by Market Cap
๐ Automakers
โ๏ธ Airlines
๐ซ Airports
โ๏ธ Aircraft manufacturers
๐ฆ Banks
๐จ Hotels
๐ Pharmaceuticals
๐ E-Commerce
โ๏ธ Healthcare
๐ฆ Courier services
๐ฐ Media/Press
๐ท Alcoholic beverages
๐ฅค Beverages
๐ Clothing
โ๏ธ Mining
๐ Railways
๐ฆ Insurance
๐ Real estate
โ Ports
๐ผ Professional services
๐ด Food
๐ Restaurant chains
โ๐ป Software
๐ Semiconductors
๐ฌ Tobacco
๐ณ Financial services
๐ข Oil&Gas
๐ Electricity
๐งช Chemicals
๐ฐ Investment
๐ก Telecommunication
๐๏ธ Retail
๐ฅ๏ธ Internet
๐ Construction
๐ฎ Video Game
๐ป Tech
๐ฆพ AI
>> All Categories
ETFs
๐ All ETFs
๐๏ธ Bond ETFs
๏ผ Dividend ETFs
โฟ Bitcoin ETFs
โข Ethereum ETFs
๐ช Crypto Currency ETFs
๐ฅ Gold ETFs & ETCs
๐ฅ Silver ETFs & ETCs
๐ข๏ธ Oil ETFs & ETCs
๐ฝ Commodities ETFs & ETNs
๐ Emerging Markets ETFs
๐ Small-Cap ETFs
๐ Low volatility ETFs
๐ Inverse/Bear ETFs
โฌ๏ธ Leveraged ETFs
๐ Global/World ETFs
๐บ๐ธ USA ETFs
๐บ๐ธ S&P 500 ETFs
๐บ๐ธ Dow Jones ETFs
๐ช๐บ Europe ETFs
๐จ๐ณ China ETFs
๐ฏ๐ต Japan ETFs
๐ฎ๐ณ India ETFs
๐ฌ๐ง UK ETFs
๐ฉ๐ช Germany ETFs
๐ซ๐ท France ETFs
โ๏ธ Mining ETFs
โ๏ธ Gold Mining ETFs
โ๏ธ Silver Mining ETFs
๐งฌ Biotech ETFs
๐ฉโ๐ป Tech ETFs
๐ Real Estate ETFs
โ๏ธ Healthcare ETFs
โก Energy ETFs
๐ Renewable Energy ETFs
๐ก๏ธ Insurance ETFs
๐ฐ Water ETFs
๐ด Food & Beverage ETFs
๐ฑ Socially Responsible ETFs
๐ฃ๏ธ Infrastructure ETFs
๐ก Innovation ETFs
๐ Semiconductors ETFs
๐ Aerospace & Defense ETFs
๐ Cybersecurity ETFs
๐ฆพ Artificial Intelligence ETFs
Watchlist
Account
First Interstate BancSystem
FIBK
#3771
Rank
C$4.69 B
Marketcap
๐บ๐ธ
United States
Country
C$46.45
Share price
1.77%
Change (1 day)
17.34%
Change (1 year)
๐ฆ Banks
๐ณ Financial services
Categories
Market cap
Revenue
Earnings
Price history
P/E ratio
P/S ratio
More
Price history
P/E ratio
P/S ratio
P/B ratio
Operating margin
EPS
Dividends
Dividend yield
Shares outstanding
Fails to deliver
Cost to borrow
Total assets
Total liabilities
Total debt
Cash on Hand
Net Assets
Annual Reports (10-K)
First Interstate BancSystem
Quarterly Reports (10-Q)
Financial Year FY2013 Q2
First Interstate BancSystem - 10-Q quarterly report FY2013 Q2
Text size:
Small
Medium
Large
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
FORM 10-Q
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
ý
Quarterly report pursuant to section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended
June 30, 2013
OR
¨
Transition report pursuant to section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the transition period from
to
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 001-34653
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
First Interstate BancSystem, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Montana
81-0331430
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
(IRS Employer
Identification No.)
401 North 31st Street, Billings, MT
59116-0918
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: 406/255-5390
______________________________________________________________
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
ý
No
¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files.) Yes
ý
No
¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
¨
Accelerated filer
ý
Non-accelerated filer
¨
Smaller reporting company
¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes
¨
No
ý
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the Registrant’s classes of common stock:
June 30, 2013 – Class A common stock
18,952,123
June 30, 2013 – Class B common stock
24,883,758
FIRST INTERSTATE BANCSYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
Index
Page
Part I.
Financial Information
Item 1.
Financial Statements (unaudited)
Consolidated Balance Sheets - June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012
3
Consolidated Statements of Income - Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 and 2012
4
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income - Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 and 2012
5
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity - Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 and 2012
6
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 and 2012
7
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
9
Item 2.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
31
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
47
Item 4.
Controls and Procedures
47
Part II.
Other Information
Item 1.
Legal Proceedings
47
Item 1A .
Risk Factors
47
Item 2.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
47
Item 3.
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
48
Item 4.
Mine Safety Disclosures
49
Item 5.
Other Information
48
Item 6.
Exhibits
49
Signatures
50
2
Table of Contents
FIRST INTERSTATE BANCSYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share data)
(Unaudited)
June 30, 2013
December 31, 2012
Assets
Cash and due from banks
$
128,452
$
177,978
Federal funds sold
786
730
Interest bearing deposits in banks
238,979
622,624
Total cash and cash equivalents
368,217
801,332
Investment securities:
Available-for-sale
1,923,216
1,995,258
Held-to-maturity (estimated fair values of $219,028 and $218,933 at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively)
215,323
208,223
Total investment securities
2,138,539
2,203,481
Loans held for investment
4,223,078
4,157,470
Mortgage loans held for sale
74,286
66,442
Total loans
4,297,364
4,223,912
Less allowance for loan losses
98,528
100,511
Net loans
4,198,836
4,123,401
Premises and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation
181,940
187,565
Goodwill
183,673
183,673
Company-owned life insurance
77,602
76,729
Other real estate owned (“OREO”)
22,782
32,571
Accrued interest receivable
29,272
28,869
Mortgage servicing rights, net of accumulated amortization and impairment reserve
13,304
12,653
Deferred tax asset, net
15,397
2,597
Core deposit intangibles, net of accumulated amortization
5,228
5,937
Other assets
56,718
62,953
Total assets
$
7,291,508
$
7,721,761
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Deposits:
Non-interest bearing
$
1,393,732
$
1,495,309
Interest bearing
4,536,600
4,745,102
Total deposits
5,930,332
6,240,411
Securities sold under repurchase agreements
421,314
505,785
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
44,054
48,208
Accrued interest payable
6,236
6,502
Long-term debt
37,139
37,160
Other borrowed funds
2
32
Preferred stock pending redemption
—
50,000
Subordinated debentures held by subsidiary trusts
82,477
82,477
Total liabilities
6,521,554
6,970,575
Stockholders’ equity:
Nonvoting noncumulative preferred stock without par value; authorized 100,000 shares; no shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2013 and 5,000 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2012
—
—
Common stock
279,232
271,335
Retained earnings
499,761
463,860
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net
(9,039
)
15,991
Total stockholders’ equity
769,954
751,186
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
$
7,291,508
$
7,721,761
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
FIRST INTERSTATE BANCSYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended June 30,
Six Months Ended June 30,
2013
2012
2013
2012
Interest income:
Interest and fees on loans
$
54,853
$
58,084
$
110,346
$
115,994
Interest and dividends on investment securities:
Taxable
7,671
9,458
15,717
19,163
Exempt from federal taxes
1,215
1,240
2,441
2,444
Interest on deposits in banks
212
279
510
516
Interest on federal funds sold
5
6
9
7
Total interest income
63,956
69,067
129,023
138,124
Interest expense:
Interest on deposits
4,038
5,779
8,393
12,041
Interest on securities sold under repurchase agreements
74
152
174
308
Interest on long-term debt
483
495
963
993
Interest on preferred stock pending redemption
—
—
159
—
Interest on subordinated debentures held by subsidiary trusts
601
1,467
1,297
2,974
Total interest expense
5,196
7,893
10,986
16,316
Net interest income
58,760
61,174
118,037
121,808
Provision for loan losses
375
12,000
875
23,250
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
58,385
49,174
117,162
98,558
Non-interest income:
Income from the origination and sale of loans
10,043
9,420
20,718
17,804
Other service charges, commissions and fees
8,977
8,254
17,233
16,678
Service charges on deposit accounts
4,323
4,455
8,391
8,616
Wealth management revenues
4,020
3,815
8,154
7,098
Investment securities gains (losses), net
(12
)
198
(4
)
229
Other income
2,228
1,520
3,906
3,619
Total non-interest income
29,579
27,662
58,398
54,044
Non-interest expense:
Salaries and wages
23,470
21,640
46,875
43,204
Employee benefits
7,546
6,819
15,721
15,785
Occupancy, net
4,063
4,037
8,089
8,025
Furniture and equipment
3,163
3,189
6,215
6,327
Outsourced technology services
2,195
2,179
4,352
4,445
OREO expense, net of income
(915
)
1,806
981
2,911
FDIC insurance premiums
1,356
1,601
2,733
3,196
Professional fees
1,136
1,002
2,263
1,935
Mortgage servicing rights amortization
719
817
1,558
1,712
Mortgage servicing rights impairment (recovery)
(11
)
52
(59
)
(816
)
Core deposit intangibles amortization
355
355
709
710
Other expenses
11,943
13,802
22,268
27,305
Total non-interest expense
55,020
57,299
111,705
114,739
Income before income tax expense
32,944
19,537
63,855
37,863
Income tax expense
11,439
6,527
22,306
12,639
Net income
21,505
13,010
41,549
25,224
Preferred stock dividends
—
853
—
1,706
Net income available to common shareholders
$
21,505
$
12,157
$
41,549
$
23,518
Basic earnings per common share
$
0.49
$
0.28
$
0.96
$
0.55
Diluted earnings per common share
$
0.49
$
0.28
$
0.95
$
0.55
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
FIRST INTERSTATE BANCSYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended June 30,
Six Months Ended June 30,
2013
2012
2013
2012
Net income
$
21,505
$
13,010
$
41,549
$
25,224
Other comprehensive loss, before tax:
Investment securities available-for sale:
Change in net unrealized gains/losses during period
(35,625
)
(1,864
)
(41,342
)
(1,107
)
Reclassification adjustment for net losses (gains) included in income
12
(198
)
4
(229
)
Defined benefit post-retirement benefits plans:
Change in net actuarial loss
35
35
70
68
Other comprehensive loss, before tax
(35,578
)
(2,027
)
(41,268
)
(1,268
)
Deferred tax benefit related to other comprehensive loss
13,999
797
16,238
499
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax
(21,579
)
(1,230
)
(25,030
)
(769
)
Comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
$
(74
)
$
11,780
$
16,519
$
24,455
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
FIRST INTERSTATE BANCSYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
(Unaudited)
Preferred
stock
Common
stock
Retained
earnings
Accumulated
other
comprehensive
income (loss)
Total
stockholders’
equity
Balance at December 31, 2012
$
—
$
271,335
$
463,860
$
15,991
$
751,186
Comprehensive income:
Net income
—
—
41,549
—
41,549
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax benefit
—
—
—
(25,030
)
(25,030
)
Common stock transactions:
25,677 common shares purchased and retired
—
(448
)
—
—
(448
)
26,096 common shares issued
—
—
—
—
—
108,873 non-vested common shares issued
—
—
—
—
—
10,138 non-vested common shares forfeited
—
—
—
—
—
446,404 stock options exercised, net of 150,290 shares tendered in payment of option price and income tax withholding amounts
—
5,799
—
—
5,799
Tax benefit of stock-based compensation
—
524
—
—
524
Stock-based compensation expense
—
2,022
—
—
2,022
Cash dividends declared:
Common ($0.13 per share)
—
—
(5,648
)
—
(5,648
)
Balance at June 30, 2013
$
—
$
279,232
$
499,761
$
(9,039
)
$
769,954
Balance at December 31, 2011
$
50,000
$
266,842
$
435,144
$
19,034
$
771,020
Comprehensive income:
Net income
—
—
25,224
—
25,224
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax benefit
—
—
—
(769
)
(769
)
Common stock transactions:
17,981 common shares purchased and retired
—
(257
)
—
—
(257
)
23,973 common shares issued
—
—
—
—
—
122,912 non-vested common shares issued
—
—
—
—
—
3,193 non-vested common shares forfeited
—
—
—
—
—
118,865 stock options exercised, net of 39,667 shares tendered in payment of option price and income tax withholding amounts
—
1,263
—
—
1,263
Tax benefit of stock-based compensation
—
126
—
—
126
Stock-based compensation expense
—
1,724
—
—
1,724
Cash dividends declared:
Common ($0.24 per share)
—
—
(10,290
)
—
(10,290
)
Preferred (6.75% per share)
—
—
(1,706
)
—
(1,706
)
Balance at June 30, 2012
$
50,000
$
269,698
$
448,372
$
18,265
$
786,335
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
6
Table of Contents
FIRST INTERSTATE BANCSYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
Six Months Ended June 30,
2013
2012
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income
$
41,549
$
25,224
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Provision for loan losses
875
23,250
Net gain on disposal of property and equipment
(16
)
(501
)
Depreciation and amortization
8,298
8,568
Net premium amortization on investment securities
7,902
5,188
Net loss (gain) on investment securities transactions
4
(229
)
Net gain on sale of mortgage loans held for sale
(14,984
)
(12,423
)
Net loss (gain) on sale of OREO
(2,671
)
6
Write-down of OREO and other assets pending disposal
3,180
1,217
Net reversal of impairment of mortgage servicing rights
(59
)
(816
)
Net gain on sale of mortgage servicing rights
—
(19
)
Deferred income tax expense
3,456
5,030
Net increase in cash surrender value of company-owned life insurance policies
(873
)
(969
)
Stock-based compensation expense
2,022
1,724
Tax benefits from stock-based compensation expense
524
126
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation
(468
)
(108
)
Originations of mortgage loans held for sale, net of sales
4,991
(12,265
)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Decrease (increase) in interest receivable
(403
)
1,038
Decrease in other assets
7,004
1,754
Increase (decrease) in accrued interest payable
(266
)
92
Decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses
(4,112
)
(8,659
)
Net cash provided by operating activities
55,953
37,228
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of investment securities:
Held-to-maturity
(13,755
)
(19,104
)
Available-for-sale
(430,395
)
(439,614
)
Proceeds from maturities and pay-downs of investment securities:
Held-to-maturity
5,807
4,739
Available-for-sale
453,678
536,527
Capital distribution by unconsolidated subsidiary trust
—
1,238
Proceeds from sales of mortgage servicing rights
470
907
Extensions of credit to customers, net of repayments
(84,078
)
(29,736
)
Recoveries of loans charged-off
7,057
2,795
Proceeds from sales of OREO
18,464
15,674
Capital expenditures, net of sales
(1,886
)
(8,467
)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
$
(44,638
)
$
64,959
FIRST INTERSTATE BANCSYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (CONTINUED)
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
Six Months Ended June 30,
2013
2012
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net increase (decrease) in deposits
$
(310,079
)
$
74,408
Net decrease in repurchase agreements
(84,471
)
(60,250
)
Net decrease in other borrowed funds
(30
)
—
Repayment of junior subordinated debentures held by subsidiary trusts
—
(41,238
)
Repayments of long-term debt
(21
)
(19
)
Redemption of preferred stock
(50,000
)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
5,799
1,263
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation
468
108
Purchase and retirement of common stock
(448
)
(257
)
Dividends paid to common stockholders
(5,648
)
(10,290
)
Dividends paid to preferred stockholders
—
(1,706
)
Net cash used in financing activities
(444,430
)
(37,981
)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
(433,115
)
64,206
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
801,332
472,447
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$
368,217
$
536,653
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for income taxes
$
20,838
$
12,740
Cash paid during the period for interest expense
11,252
16,224
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
7
Table of Contents
FIRST INTERSTATE BANCSYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)
(1)
Basis of Presentation
In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) contain all adjustments (all of which are of a normal recurring nature) necessary to present fairly the financial position of the Company at
June 30, 2013
and
December 31, 2012
, and the results of operations for each of the
three
and
six
month periods ended
June 30, 2013
and
2012
and cash flows for the
six
months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The balance sheet information at
December 31, 2012
is derived from audited consolidated financial statements. Certain reclassifications, none of which were material, have been made to conform prior year financial statements to the
June 30, 2013
presentation. These reclassifications did not change previously reported net income or stockholders’ equity.
These unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2012
. Operating results for the
three
and
six
months ended
June 30, 2013
are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending
December 31, 2013
.
(2)
Investment Securities
The amortized cost and approximate fair values of investment securities are summarized as follows:
June 30, 2013
Amortized
Cost
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Estimated
Fair
Value
Available-for-Sale:
Obligations of U.S. government agencies
$
744,215
$
1,158
$
(11,559
)
$
733,814
U.S. agency residential mortgage-backed securities & collateralized mortgage obligations
1,190,975
15,783
(17,819
)
1,188,939
Private mortgage-backed securities
457
9
(3
)
463
Total
$
1,935,647
$
16,950
$
(29,381
)
$
1,923,216
June 30, 2013
Amortized
Cost
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Estimated
Fair
Value
Held-to Maturity:
State, county and municipal securities
$
197,193
$
5,730
$
(1,990
)
$
200,933
Corporate securities
18,130
64
(99
)
18,095
Total
$
215,323
$
5,794
$
(2,089
)
$
219,028
December 31, 2012
Amortized
Cost
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Estimated
Fair
Value
Available-for-Sale:
Obligations of U.S. government agencies
$
751,501
$
3,518
$
(163
)
$
754,856
U.S. agency residential mortgage-backed securities & collateralized mortgage obligations
1,214,377
27,000
(1,526
)
1,239,851
Private mortgage-backed securities
539
13
(1
)
551
Total
$
1,966,417
$
30,531
$
(1,690
)
$
1,995,258
8
Table of Contents
FIRST INTERSTATE BANCSYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)
December 31, 2012
Amortized
Cost
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Estimated
Fair
Value
Held-to Maturity:
State, county and municipal securities
$
192,875
$
10,835
$
(176
)
$
203,534
Corporate securities
14,975
64
(13
)
15,026
Other securities
373
—
—
373
Total
$
208,223
$
10,899
$
(189
)
$
218,933
Gross realized gains and losses from the disposition of investment securities are summarized in the following table:
Three Months Ended June 30,
Six Months Ended June 30,
2013
2012
2013
2012
Gross realized gains
$
4
$
201
$
12
$
232
Gross realized losses
16
3
16
3
The following tables show the gross unrealized losses and fair values of investment securities, aggregated by investment category, and the length of time individual investment securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, as of
June 30, 2013
and
December 31, 2012
Less than 12 Months
12 Months or More
Total
June 30, 2013
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Available-for-Sale:
Obligations of U.S. government agencies
$
442,307
$
(11,559
)
$
—
$
—
$
442,307
$
(11,559
)
U.S. agency residential mortgage-backed securities & collateralized mortgage obligations
742,630
(17,819
)
—
—
742,630
(17,819
)
Private mortgage-backed securities
—
—
112
(3
)
112
(3
)
Total
$
1,184,937
$
(29,378
)
$
112
$
(3
)
$
1,185,049
$
(29,381
)
Less than 12 Months
12 Months or More
Total
June 30, 2013
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Held-to-Maturity:
State, county and municipal securities
$
52,225
$
(1,963
)
$
504
$
(27
)
$
52,729
$
(1,990
)
Corporate securities
12,399
(99
)
—
—
12,399
(99
)
Total
$
64,624
$
(2,062
)
$
504
$
(27
)
$
65,128
$
(2,089
)
9
Table of Contents
FIRST INTERSTATE BANCSYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)
Less than 12 Months
12 Months or More
Total
December 31, 2012
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Available-for-Sale:
Obligations of U.S. government agencies
$
93,982
$
(163
)
$
—
$
—
$
93,982
$
(163
)
U.S. agency residential mortgage-backed securities & collateralized mortgage obligations
250,198
(1,526
)
—
—
250,198
(1,526
)
Private mortgage-backed securities
—
—
137
(1
)
137
(1
)
Total
$
344,180
$
(1,689
)
$
137
$
(1
)
$
344,317
$
(1,690
)
Less than 12 Months
12 Months or More
Total
December 31, 2012
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Held-to-Maturity:
State, county and municipal securities
$
19,389
$
(168
)
$
557
$
(8
)
$
19,946
$
(176
)
Corporate securities
9,312
(13
)
—
—
9,312
(13
)
Total
$
28,701
$
(181
)
$
557
$
(8
)
$
29,258
$
(189
)
The investment portfolio is evaluated quarterly for other-than-temporary declines in the market value of each individual investment security. The Company had
212
and
69
individual investment securities that were in an unrealized loss position as of
June 30, 2013
and
December 31, 2012
, respectively. Unrealized losses as of
June 30, 2013
and
December 31, 2012
related primarily to fluctuations in the current interest rates. The Company does not have the intent to sell any of the available-for-sale securities in the above table and it is not likely that the Company will have to sell any such securities before a recovery in cost. No impairment losses were recorded during the
three
or
six
months ended
June 30, 2013
and
2012
.
Maturities of investment securities at
June 30, 2013
are shown below. Maturities of mortgage-backed securities have been adjusted to reflect shorter maturities based upon estimated prepayments of principal. All other investment securities maturities are shown at contractual maturity dates.
Available-for-Sale
Held-to-Maturity
June 30, 2013
Amortized
Cost
Estimated
Fair Value
Amortized
Cost
Estimated
Fair Value
Within one year
$
328,967
$
328,602
$
4,898
$
4,935
After one year but within five years
944,490
940,392
57,519
58,058
After five years but within ten years
602,366
594,500
88,943
90,890
After ten years
59,824
59,722
63,963
65,145
Total
$
1,935,647
$
1,923,216
$
215,323
$
219,028
As of
June 30, 2013
, the Company had investment securities callable within one year with amortized costs and estimated fair values of $
403,826
and $
395,608
, respectively, including callable structured notes with amortized costs and estimated fair values of $
117,486
and $
115,366
, respectively. These investment securities are primarily classified as available-for-sale and included in the after one year but within five years category in the table above.
10
Table of Contents
FIRST INTERSTATE BANCSYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)
(3)
Loans
The following table presents loans by class as of the dates indicated:
June 30, 2013
December 31, 2012
Real estate loans:
Commercial
$
1,447,145
$
1,497,272
Construction:
Land acquisition & development
210,761
220,196
Residential
60,883
49,274
Commercial
65,567
65,059
Total construction loans
337,211
334,529
Residential
804,200
708,339
Agricultural
176,799
177,244
Total real estate loans
2,765,355
2,717,384
Consumer:
Indirect consumer
457,151
438,245
Other consumer
136,459
137,743
Credit card
59,334
60,806
Total consumer loans
652,944
636,794
Commercial
680,751
688,753
Agricultural
121,530
113,627
Other, including overdrafts
2,498
912
Loans held for investment
4,223,078
4,157,470
Mortgage loans held for sale
74,286
66,442
Total loans
$
4,297,364
$
4,223,912
11
Table of Contents
FIRST INTERSTATE BANCSYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)
Loans are considered past due if the required principal and interest payments have not been received as of the date such payments were due. The following tables present the contractual aging of the Company’s recorded investment in past due loans by class as of the dates indicated:
Total Loans
30 - 59
60 - 89
> 90
30 or More
Days
Days
Days
Days
Current
Non-accrual
Total
As of June 30, 2013
Past Due
Past Due
Past Due
Past Due
Loans
Loans
Loans
Real estate
Commercial
$
11,794
$
1,766
$
—
$
13,560
$
1,387,523
$
46,062
$
1,447,145
Construction:
Land acquisition & development
4,265
974
61
5,300
189,173
16,288
210,761
Residential
1,112
—
—
1,112
58,245
1,526
60,883
Commercial
—
—
—
—
59,375
6,192
65,567
Total construction loans
5,377
974
61
6,412
306,793
24,006
337,211
Residential
2,139
1,033
701
3,873
792,782
7,545
804,200
Agricultural
350
—
83
433
166,677
9,689
176,799
Total real estate loans
19,660
3,773
845
24,278
2,653,775
87,302
2,765,355
Consumer:
Indirect consumer
2,006
416
38
2,460
454,395
296
457,151
Other consumer
867
63
14
944
134,975
540
136,459
Credit card
301
275
487
1,063
58,250
21
59,334
Total consumer loans
3,174
754
539
4,467
647,620
857
652,944
Commercial
8,235
1,523
361
10,119
655,189
15,443
680,751
Agricultural
1,264
1,025
—
2,289
119,114
127
121,530
Other, including overdrafts
—
—
—
2,498
—
2,498
Loans held for investment
32,333
7,075
1,745
41,153
4,078,196
103,729
4,223,078
Mortgage loans originated for sale
—
—
—
—
74,286
—
74,286
Total loans
$
32,333
$
7,075
$
1,745
$
41,153
$
4,152,482
$
103,729
$
4,297,364
12
Table of Contents
FIRST INTERSTATE BANCSYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)
Total Loans
30 - 59
60 - 89
> 90
30 or More
Days
Days
Days
Days
Current
Non-accrual
Total
As of December 31, 2012
Past Due
Past Due
Past Due
Past Due
Loans
Loans
Loans
Real estate
Commercial
$
5,449
$
3,163
$
2
$
8,614
$
1,438,142
$
50,516
$
1,497,272
Construction:
Land acquisition & development
3,371
2,121
318
5,810
195,077
19,309
220,196
Residential
283
—
—
283
46,816
2,175
49,274
Commercial
—
—
—
—
56,933
8,126
65,059
Total construction loans
3,654
2,121
318
6,093
298,826
29,610
334,529
Residential
3,896
969
1,085
5,950
691,963
10,426
708,339
Agricultural
1,187
—
218
1,405
171,009
4,830
177,244
Total real estate loans
14,186
6,253
1,623
22,062
2,599,940
95,382
2,717,384
Consumer:
Indirect consumer
3,218
512
32
3,762
434,200
283
438,245
Other consumer
1,044
104
31
1,179
135,574
990
137,743
Credit card
409
278
392
1,079
59,704
23
60,806
Total consumer loans
4,671
894
455
6,020
629,478
1,296
636,794
Commercial
5,463
1,064
216
6,743
671,414
10,596
688,753
Agricultural
1,710
361
—
2,071
111,031
525
113,627
Other, including overdrafts
—
—
—
—
912
—
912
Loans held for investment
26,030
8,572
2,294
36,896
4,012,775
107,799
4,157,470
Mortgage loans originated for sale
—
—
—
—
66,442
—
66,442
Total loans
$
26,030
$
8,572
$
2,294
$
36,896
$
4,079,217
$
107,799
$
4,223,912
If interest on non-accrual loans had been accrued, such income would have been approximately $
318
and $
584
for the three months ended
June 30, 2013
and
2012
, respectively and approximately
$655
and
$1,272
for the
six
months ended
June 30, 2013
and
2012
, respectively.
13
Table of Contents
FIRST INTERSTATE BANCSYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)
The Company considers impaired loans to include all loans risk rated doubtful, loans placed on non-accrual status and loans renegotiated in troubled debt restructurings with the exception of consumer loans. The following tables present information on the Company’s recorded investment in impaired loans as of dates indicated:
As of June 30, 2013
Unpaid
Total
Principal
Balance
Recorded
Investment
With No
Allowance
Recorded
Investment
With
Allowance
Total
Recorded
Investment
Related
Allowance
Real estate:
Commercial
$
65,957
$
32,854
$
31,688
$
64,542
$
5,498
Construction:
Land acquisition & development
21,554
10,526
6,755
17,281
2,549
Residential
2,227
1,526
—
1,526
—
Commercial
8,374
5,944
248
6,192
63
Total construction loans
32,155
17,996
7,003
24,999
2,612
Residential
10,554
2,448
5,331
7,779
1,253
Agricultural
10,017
7,363
2,558
9,921
904
Total real estate loans
118,683
60,661
46,580
107,241
10,267
Commercial
17,776
6,792
9,918
16,710
5,205
Agricultural
191
117
22
139
22
Total
$
136,650
$
67,570
$
56,520
$
124,090
$
15,494
As of December 31, 2012
Unpaid
Total
Principal
Balance
Recorded
Investment
With No
Allowance
Recorded
Investment
With
Allowance
Total
Recorded
Investment
Related
Allowance
Real estate:
Commercial
$
84,300
$
39,049
$
34,774
$
73,823
$
4,112
Construction:
Land acquisition & development
28,558
15,891
7,173
23,064
1,457
Residential
3,018
1,976
710
2,686
251
Commercial
10,447
7,785
340
8,125
69
Total construction loans
42,023
25,652
8,223
33,875
1,777
Residential
13,271
6,152
4,495
10,647
1,677
Agricultural
5,559
1,834
3,227
5,061
784
Total real estate loans
145,153
72,687
50,719
123,406
8,350
Commercial
12,770
9,036
3,206
12,242
1,919
Agricultural
589
509
28
537
28
Total
$
158,512
$
82,232
$
53,953
$
136,185
$
10,297
14
Table of Contents
FIRST INTERSTATE BANCSYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)
The following tables present the average recorded investment in and income recognized on impaired loans for the periods indicated:
Three Months Ended June 30,
2013
2012
Average Recorded Investment
Income Recognized
Average Recorded Investment
Income Recognized
Real estate:
Commercial
$
67,605
$
272
$
87,135
$
320
Construction:
Land acquisition & development
19,007
15
51,949
30
Residential
1,569
—
3,637
—
Commercial
6,346
—
20,807
—
Total construction loans
26,922
15
76,393
30
Residential
8,311
5
14,726
12
Agricultural
8,255
4
6,816
—
Total real estate loans
111,093
296
185,070
362
Commercial
16,087
18
14,355
22
Agricultural
373
4
1,378
11
Total
$
127,553
$
318
$
200,803
$
395
Six Months Ended June 30,
2013
2012
Average Recorded Investment
Income Recognized
Average Recorded Investment
Income Recognized
Real estate:
Commercial
$
67,192
$
610
$
85,701
$
671
Construction:
Land acquisition & development
20,123
456
56,924
46
Residential
2,040
—
8,810
—
Commercial
7,118
—
22,536
—
Total construction loans
29,281
456
88,270
46
Residential
9,429
9
16,251
21
Agricultural
6,611
8
10,039
32
Total real estate loans
112,513
1,083
200,261
770
Commercial
14,484
36
16,195
44
Agricultural
502
8
1,246
15
Total
$
127,499
$
1,127
$
217,702
$
829
The amount of interest income recognized by the Company within the period that the loans were impaired was primarily related to loans modified in a troubled debt restructuring that remained on accrual status. Interest payments received on non-accrual impaired loans are applied to principal. Interest income is subsequently recognized only to the extent cash payments are received in excess of principal due. If interest on impaired loans had been accrued, interest income on impaired loans would have been approximately $
406
and $
580
for the three months ended
June 30, 2013
and
2012
, respectively, and approximately
$818
and
$1,263
for the
six
months ended
June 30, 2013
and
2012
, respectively.
Collateralized impaired loans are generally recorded at the fair value of the underlying collateral using discounted cash flows, independent appraisals and management estimates based upon current market conditions. For loans measured under the present value of cash flows method, the change in present value attributable to the passage of time, if applicable, is recognized in the provision for loan losses and thus no interest income is recognized.
15
Table of Contents
FIRST INTERSTATE BANCSYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)
Modifications of performing loans are made in the ordinary course of business and are completed on a case-by-case basis as negotiated with the borrower. Loan modifications typically include interest rate concessions, interest only periods of less than twelve months, short-term payment deferrals and extension of amortization periods to provide payment relief. A loan modification is considered a troubled debt restructuring if the borrower is experiencing financial difficulties and the Company, for economic or legal reasons, grants a concession to the borrower that it would not otherwise consider. Certain troubled debt restructurings are on non-accrual status at the time of restructuring and are typically returned to accrual status after considering the borrower's sustained repayment performance in accordance with the restructuring agreement for a period of at least six months and management is reasonably assured of future performance. If the troubled debt restructuring meets these performance criteria and the interest rate granted at the modification is equal to or greater than the rate that the Company was willing to accept at the time of the restructuring for a new loan with comparable risk, then the loan will return to performing status and the accrual of interest will resume.
The Company had loans renegotiated in troubled debt restructurings of $
67,939
as of
June 30, 2013
, of which $
44,533
were included in non-accrual loans and $
23,406
were on accrual status. The Company had loans renegotiated in troubled debt restructurings of $
76,597
as of
December 31, 2012
, of which $
44,665
were included in non-accrual loans and $
31,932
were on accrual status.
The following tables present information on the Company's troubled debt restructurings that occurred during the
three
and
six
months ended
June 30, 2013
:
Number of Notes
Type of Concession
Principal Balance at Restructure Date
Three Months Ended June 30, 2013
Interest only period
Extension of terms or maturity
Interest rate adjustment
Other (1)
Real estate:
Construction:
Land acquisition & development
1
$
—
$
334
$
—
$
—
$
334
Residential
2
—
408
—
—
408
Total construction loans
3
—
742
—
—
742
Residential
3
—
463
—
—
463
Total real estate loans
6
—
1,205
—
—
1,205
Total loans restructured during period
6
$
—
$
1,205
$
—
$
—
$
1,205
Number of Notes
Type of Concession
Principal Balance at Restructure Date
Six Months Ended June 30, 2013
Interest only period
Extension of terms or maturity
Interest rate adjustment
Other (1)
Real estate:
Commercial
10
$
—
$
389
$
5,345
$
183
$
5,917
Construction:
Land acquisition & development
2
120
334
—
—
454
Residential
2
—
408
—
—
408
Total construction loans
4
120
742
—
—
862
Residential
3
—
463
—
—
463
Total real estate loans
17
120
1,594
5,345
183
7,242
Commercial
4
50
178
265
87
580
Total loans restructured during period
21
$
170
$
1,772
$
5,610
$
270
$
7,822
(1) Other includes concessions that reduce or defer payments for a specified period of time and/or do not fit into other designated categories.
16
Table of Contents
FIRST INTERSTATE BANCSYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)
For troubled debt restructurings that were on non-accrual status or otherwise deemed impaired before the modification, a specific reserve may already be recorded. In periods subsequent to modification, the Company continues to evaluate all troubled debt restructurings for possible impairment and recognizes impairment through the allowance. Additionally these loans continue to work their way through the credit cycle through charge-off, pay-off or foreclosure. Financial effects of modifications of troubled debt restructurings may include principal loan forgiveness or other charge-offs directly related to the restructuring. The Company had no charge-offs directly related to modifying troubled debt restructurings during the
three
and
six
months ended
June 30, 2013
or
2012
.
The following table presents information on the Company's troubled debt restructurings during the previous 12 months for which there was a payment default during the periods indicated. The Company considers a payment default to occur on troubled debt restructurings when the loan is 90 days or more past due or was placed on non-accrual status after the modification.
Three Months Ended June 30, 2013
Six Months Ended June 30, 2013
Number of Notes
Balance
Number of Notes
Balance
Real estate:
Commercial
1
$
625
1
$
625
Construction:
Residential
—
—
1
278
Total real estate loans
1
625
2
903
Commercial
1
332
Total
1
$
625
3
$
1,235
At
June 30, 2013
, there were no material commitments to lend additional funds to borrowers whose existing loans have been renegotiated or are classified as non-accrual.
As part of the on-going and continuous monitoring of the credit quality of the Company’s loan portfolio, management tracks internally assigned risk classifications of loans. The Company adheres to a Uniform Classification System developed jointly by the various bank regulatory agencies to internally risk rate loans. The Uniform Classification System defines three broad categories of criticized assets, which the Company uses as credit quality indicators:
Other Assets Especially Mentioned
— includes loans that exhibit weaknesses in financial condition, loan structure or documentation, which if not promptly corrected, may lead to the development of abnormal risk elements.
Substandard
— includes loans that are inadequately protected by the current sound worth and paying capacity of the borrower. Although the primary source of repayment for a Substandard is not currently sufficient; collateral or other sources of repayment are sufficient to satisfy the debt. Continuance of a Substandard loan is not warranted unless positive steps are taken to improve the worthiness of the credit.
Doubtful
— includes loans that exhibit pronounced weaknesses to a point where collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions and values, is highly questionable and improbable. Doubtful loans are required to be placed on non-accrual status and are assigned specific loss exposure.
17
Table of Contents
FIRST INTERSTATE BANCSYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)
The following tables present the Company’s recorded investment in criticized loans by class and credit quality indicator based on the most recent analysis performed as of the dates indicated:
As of June 30, 2013
Other Assets
Especially
Mentioned
Substandard
Doubtful
Total
Criticized
Loans
Real estate:
Commercial
$
102,975
$
101,713
$
18,377
$
223,065
Construction:
Land acquisition & development
25,726
16,687
6,733
49,146
Residential
2,363
1,530
279
4,172
Commercial
—
485
5,707
6,192
Total construction loans
28,089
18,702
12,719
59,510
Residential
6,834
7,439
5,867
20,140
Agricultural
12,397
11,251
2,558
26,206
Total real estate loans
150,295
139,105
39,521
328,921
Consumer:
Indirect consumer
757
1,517
124
2,398
Other consumer
586
782
386
1,754
Credit card
—
450
2,291
2,741
Total consumer loans
1,343
2,749
2,801
6,893
Commercial
37,458
18,437
9,922
65,817
Agricultural
3,294
1,495
22
4,811
Total
$
192,390
$
161,786
$
52,266
$
406,442
As of December 31, 2012
Other Assets
Especially
Mentioned
Substandard
Doubtful
Total
Criticized
Loans
Real estate:
Commercial
$
101,936
$
135,282
$
15,173
$
252,391
Construction:
Land acquisition & development
28,137
25,884
4,739
58,760
Residential
2,531
2,427
1,143
6,101
Commercial
3,000
795
7,383
11,178
Total construction loans
33,668
29,106
13,265
76,039
Residential
9,542
11,680
4,511
25,733
Agricultural
18,490
6,737
3,228
28,455
Total real estate loans
163,636
182,805
36,177
382,618
Consumer:
Indirect consumer
793
1,764
114
2,671
Other consumer
684
1,395
628
2,707
Credit card
—
415
2,085
2,500
Total consumer loans
1,477
3,574
2,827
7,878
Commercial
42,223
27,184
3,428
72,835
Agricultural
2,596
1,625
28
4,249
Total
$
209,932
$
215,188
$
42,460
$
467,580
18
Table of Contents
FIRST INTERSTATE BANCSYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)
The Company maintains a credit review function, which is independent of the credit approval process, to assess assigned internal risk classifications and monitor compliance with internal lending policies and procedures. Written action plans with firm target dates for resolution of identified problems are maintained and reviewed on a quarterly basis for all categories of criticized loans.
(4)
Allowance For Loan Losses
The following tables present a summary of changes in the allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment for the periods indicated.
Three Months Ended June 30, 2013
Real Estate
Consumer
Commercial
Agriculture
Other
Total
Allowance for loan losses:
Beginning balance
$
71,666
$
7,088
$
18,652
$
480
$
18
$
97,904
Provision charged to operating expense
(1,009
)
579
763
27
15
375
Less loans charged-off
(2,027
)
(1,299
)
(569
)
—
—
(3,895
)
Add back recoveries of loans previously
charged-off
2,873
672
596
3
—
4,144
Ending balance
$
71,503
$
7,040
$
19,442
$
510
$
33
$
98,528
Six Months Ended June 30, 2013
Real Estate
Consumer
Commercial
Agriculture
Other
Total
Allowance for loan losses:
Beginning balance
$
75,782
$
7,140
$
17,073
$
504
$
12
$
100,511
Provision charged to operating expense
(2,044
)
1,116
1,778
4
21
875
Less loans charged-off
(6,170
)
(2,361
)
(1,380
)
(4
)
—
(9,915
)
Add back recoveries of loans previously
charged-off
3,935
1,145
1,971
6
—
7,057
Ending balance
$
71,503
$
7,040
$
19,442
$
510
$
33
$
98,528
As of June 30, 2013
Real Estate
Consumer
Commercial
Agriculture
Other
Total
Allowance for loan losses:
Loans individually evaluated for impairment
$
10,267
$
—
$
5,205
$
22
$
—
$
15,494
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment
61,236
7,040
14,237
488
33
83,034
Allowance for loan losses
$
71,503
$
7,040
$
19,442
$
510
$
33
$
98,528
As of June 30, 2013
Real Estate
Consumer
Commercial
Agriculture
Other
Total
Total loans:
Individually evaluated for impairment
$
107,241
$
—
$
16,710
$
139
$
—
$
124,090
Collectively evaluated for impairment
2,732,400
652,944
664,041
121,391
2,498
4,173,274
Total loans
$
2,839,641
$
652,944
$
680,751
$
121,530
$
2,498
$
4,297,364
19
Table of Contents
FIRST INTERSTATE BANCSYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)
Three Months Ended June 30, 2012
Real Estate
Consumer
Commercial
Agriculture
Other
Total
Allowance for loan losses:
Beginning balance
$
89,128
$
7,212
$
18,380
$
1,182
$
—
$
115,902
Provision charged to operating expense
10,419
784
866
(69
)
—
12,000
Less loans charged-off
(22,350
)
(1,210
)
(3,180
)
(5
)
—
(26,745
)
Add back recoveries of loans previously
charged-off
526
488
609
14
—
1,637
Ending balance
$
77,723
$
7,274
$
16,675
$
1,122
$
—
$
102,794
Six Months Ended June 30, 2012
Real Estate
Consumer
Commercial
Agriculture
Other
Total
Allowance for loan losses:
Beginning balance
$
87,396
$
8,594
$
15,325
$
1,266
$
—
$
112,581
Provision charged to operating expense
16,801
193
6,307
(51
)
—
23,250
Less loans charged-off
(27,506
)
(2,522
)
(5,692
)
(112
)
—
(35,832
)
Add back recoveries of loans previously
charged-off
1,032
1,009
735
19
—
2,795
Ending balance
$
77,723
$
7,274
$
16,675
$
1,122
$
—
$
102,794
As of June 30, 2012
Real Estate
Consumer
Commercial
Agriculture
Other
Total
Allowance for loan losses:
Loans individually evaluated for impairment
$
15,199
$
—
$
2,339
$
405
$
—
$
17,943
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment
62,524
7,274
14,336
717
—
84,851
Allowance for loan losses
$
77,723
$
7,274
$
16,675
$
1,122
$
—
$
102,794
As of June 30, 2012
Real Estate
Consumer
Commercial
Agriculture
Other
Total
Total loans:
Individually evaluated for impairment
$
150,026
$
—
$
11,974
$
500
$
—
$
162,500
Collectively evaluated for impairment
2,538,281
621,212
708,036
137,615
2,319
4,007,463
Total loans
$
2,688,307
$
621,212
$
720,010
$
138,115
$
2,319
$
4,169,963
The Company performs a quarterly assessment of the adequacy of its allowance for loan losses in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The methodology used to assess the adequacy is consistently applied to the Company's loan portfolio and consists of three elements: (1) specific valuation allowances based on probable losses on impaired loans; (2) historical valuation allowances based on loan loss experience for similar loans with similar characteristics and trends; and (3) general valuation allowances determined based on changes in the nature of the loan portfolio, overall portfolio quality, industry concentrations, delinquency trends, general economic conditions and other qualitative risk factors both internal and external to the Company.
Specific allowances are established for loans where management has determined that probability of a loss exists by analyzing the borrower’s ability to repay amounts owed, collateral deficiencies and any relevant qualitative or economic factors impacting the loan. Historical valuation allowances are determined by applying percentage loss factors to the credit exposures from outstanding loans. For commercial, agricultural and real estate loans, loss factors are applied based on the internal risk classifications of these loans. For consumer loans, loss factors are applied on a portfolio basis. For commercial, agriculture and real estate loans, loss factor percentages are based on a migration analysis of our historical loss experience, designed to account for credit deterioration. For consumer loans, loss factor percentages are based on a one-year loss history. General valuation allowances are determined by evaluating, on a quarterly basis,
20
Table of Contents
FIRST INTERSTATE BANCSYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)
changes in the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, overall portfolio quality, industry concentrations, current economic and regulatory conditions and the estimated impact of these factors on historical loss rates.
(5)
Other Real Estate Owned
Information with respect to the Company's other real estate owned follows:
Three Months Ended June 30,
Six Months Ended June 30,
2013
2012
2013
2012
Beginning balance
$
32,470
$
44,756
$
32,571
$
37,452
Additions
3,224
19,139
8,555
33,117
Capitalized improvements
3
406
13
75
Valuation adjustments
(259
)
(569
)
(2,564
)
(1,147
)
Dispositions
(12,656
)
(9,915
)
(15,793
)
(15,680
)
Ending balance
$
22,782
$
53,817
$
22,782
$
53,817
(6)
Capital Stock
The Company had
18,952,123
and
17,635,369
shares of Class A common stock outstanding as of
June 30, 2013
and
December 31, 2012
, respectively.
The Company had
24,883,758
and
25,654,954
shares of Class B common stock outstanding as of
June 30, 2013
and
December 31, 2012
, respectively.
On
December 31, 2012
, the Company provided notice to holders of the Series A noncumulative redeemable preferred stock ("Series A Preferred Stock") of its intention to redeem the Series A Preferred Stock on
January 18, 2013
. Upon notice to holders of the redemption, the Series A Preferred Stock was reclassified from stockholders' equity to a liability. The aggregate redemption price for the Series A Preferred Stock was
$50,150
.
(7)
Earnings per Common Share
Basic earnings per common share is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period presented, excluding unvested restricted stock. Diluted earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares determined for the basic earnings per share computation plus the dilutive effects of stock-based compensation using the treasury stock method.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the
three
and
six
month periods ended
June 30, 2013
and
2012
.
Three Months Ended June 30,
Six Months Ended June 30,
2013
2012
2013
2012
Net income
$
21,505
$
13,010
$
41,549
$
25,224
Less preferred stock dividends
—
853
—
1,706
Net income available to common shareholders, basic and diluted
$
21,505
$
12,157
$
41,549
$
23,518
Weighted average common shares outstanding for basic earnings per share computation
43,480,502
42,966,926
43,335,682
42,920,347
Dilutive effects of stock-based compensation
427,785
93,278
376,978
96,111
Weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted earnings per common share computation
43,908,287
43,060,204
43,712,660
43,016,458
Basic earnings per common share
$
0.49
$
0.28
$
0.96
$
0.55
Diluted earnings per common share
$
0.49
$
0.28
$
0.95
$
0.55
21
Table of Contents
FIRST INTERSTATE BANCSYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)
The Company had
976,063
and
2,828,234
stock options outstanding as of
June 30, 2013
and
2012
, respectively, that were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per common share because their effect would be anti-dilutive. The Company had
56,668
and
48,196
shares of unvested restricted stock as of
June 30, 2013
and
2012
, respectively, that were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per common share because performance conditions for vesting had not been met.
(8)
Regulatory Capital
The Company is subject to the regulatory capital requirements administered by federal banking regulators and the Federal Reserve. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Company must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Company’s assets, liabilities and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Company to maintain minimum amounts and ratios of total and tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets, and of tier 1 capital to average assets, as defined in the regulations. As of
June 30, 2013
and
December 31, 2012
, the Company exceeded all capital adequacy requirements to which it is subject.
Actual capital amounts and ratios and selected minimum regulatory thresholds for the Company and its bank subsidiary, First Interstate Bank (“FIB”), as of
June 30, 2013
and
December 31, 2012
are presented in the following tables:
Actual
Adequately Capitalized
Well Capitalized
Amount
Ratio
Amount
Ratio
Amount
Ratio
June 30, 2013
Total risk-based capital:
Consolidated
$
788,109
16.3
%
$
387,029
8.0
%
NA
NA
FIB
715,684
14.9
384,810
8.0
$
481,012
10.0
%
Tier 1 risk-based capital:
Consolidated
699,166
14.5
193,515
4.0
NA
NA
FIB
643,083
13.4
192,405
4.0
$
288,607
6.0
Leverage capital ratio:
Consolidated
699,166
9.7
287,443
4.0
NA
NA
FIB
643,083
9.0
286,562
4.0
$
358,203
5.0
Actual
Adequately Capitalized
Well Capitalized
Amount
Ratio
Amount
Ratio
Amount
Ratio
December 31, 2012
Total risk-based capital:
Consolidated
$
748,431
15.6
%
$
384,014
8.0
%
NA
NA
FIB
697,695
14.6
382,245
8.0
$
477,806
10.0
%
Tier 1 risk-based capital:
Consolidated
652,929
13.6
192,007
4.0
NA
NA
FIB
622,466
13.0
191,122
4.0
$
286,683
6.0
Leverage capital ratio:
Consolidated
652,929
8.8
296,559
4.0
NA
NA
FIB
622,466
8.4
296,061
4.0
$
370,077
5.0
22
Table of Contents
FIRST INTERSTATE BANCSYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)
(9)
Commitments and Contingencies
In the normal course of business, the Company is involved in various claims and litigation. In the opinion of management, following consultation with legal counsel, the ultimate liability or disposition thereof is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial condition, results of operations or liquidity of the Company.
The Company had commitments under construction agreements of
$6,430
as of
June 30, 2013
.
(10)
Financial Instruments with Off-Balance Sheet Risk
The Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the commitment contract. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. At
June 30, 2013
, commitments to extend credit to existing and new borrowers approximated $
1,110,057
which included $
287,147
on unused credit card lines and $
289,285
with commitment maturities beyond one year.
Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. At
June 30, 2013
, the Company had outstanding standby letters of credit of $
70,957
. The estimated fair value of the obligation undertaken by the Company in issuing the standby letters of credit is included in other liabilities in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet.
(11)
Supplemental Disclosures to Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
The Company transferred loans of $
8,555
and $
33,117
to OREO during the
six
months ended
June 30, 2013
and
2012
, respectively.
The Company transferred internally originated mortgage servicing rights of $
2,149
and $
2,061
from loans to mortgage servicing assets during the
six
months ended
June 30, 2013
and
2012
, respectively.
The Company reclassified tax credit investments with a carrying value of
$429
from held-to-maturity investment securities to other assets during the
six
months ended
June 30, 2013
.
The Company transferred bank buildings and land pending disposal with book values of
$1,448
and
$566
to other assets during the
six
months ended
June 30, 2013
and
2012
, respectively.
(12)
Other Comprehensive Income
The gross amounts of each component of other comprehensive income and the related tax effects are as follows:
Pre-tax
Tax Expense (Benefit)
Net of Tax
Three Months Ended June 30,
2013
2012
2013
2012
2013
2012
Investment securities available-for sale:
Change in net unrealized gains/losses
during period
$
(35,625
)
$
(1,864
)
$
(14,018
)
$
(733
)
$
(21,607
)
$
(1,131
)
Reclassification adjustment for net losses (gains) included in net income
12
(198
)
5
(78
)
7
(120
)
Defined benefits post-retirement benefit plan:
Change in net actuarial loss
35
35
14
14
21
21
Total other comprehensive loss
$
(35,578
)
$
(2,027
)
$
(13,999
)
$
(797
)
$
(21,579
)
$
(1,230
)
23
Table of Contents
FIRST INTERSTATE BANCSYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)
Pre-tax
Tax Expense (Benefit)
Net of Tax
Six Months Ended June 30,
2013
2012
2013
2012
2013
2012
Investment securities available-for sale:
Change in net unrealized gains/losses
during period
$
(41,342
)
$
(1,107
)
$
(16,268
)
$
(436
)
$
(25,074
)
$
(671
)
Reclassification adjustment for net losses (gains) included in net income
4
(229
)
2
(90
)
2
(139
)
Defined benefits post-retirement benefit plan:
Change in net actuarial loss
70
68
28
27
42
41
Total other comprehensive loss
$
(41,268
)
$
(1,268
)
$
(16,238
)
$
(499
)
$
(25,030
)
$
(769
)
The components of accumulated other comprehensive income, net of income taxes, are as follows:
June 30, 2013
December 31, 2012
Net unrealized gain (loss) on investment securities available-for-sale
$
(7,535
)
$
17,537
Net actuarial loss on defined benefit post-retirement benefit plans
(1,504
)
(1,546
)
Net accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
$
(9,039
)
$
15,991
(13)
Fair Value Measurements
Financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are as follows:
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
As of June 30, 2013
Balance
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
Significant Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Investment securities available-for-sale:
Obligations of U.S. government agencies
$
733,814
$
—
$
733,814
$
—
U.S. agencies mortgage-backed securities & collateralized mortgage obligations
1,188,939
—
1,188,939
—
Private mortgage-backed securities
463
—
463
—
Mortgage servicing rights
22,617
—
22,617
—
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
As of December 31, 2012
Balance
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
Significant Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Investment securities available-for-sale:
Obligations of U.S. government agencies
$
754,856
$
—
$
754,856
$
—
U.S. agencies mortgage-backed securities & collateralized mortgage obligations
1,239,851
—
1,239,851
—
Private mortgage-backed securities
551
—
551
—
Mortgage servicing rights
16,373
—
16,373
—
There were no transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy during the
six
months ended
June 30, 2013
or
2012
.
24
Table of Contents
FIRST INTERSTATE BANCSYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)
The methodologies used by the Company in determining the fair values of each class of financial instruments are based primarily on the use of independent, market-based data to reflect a value that would be reasonably expected in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The Company obtains fair value measurements for investment securities from an independent pricing service and evaluates mortgage servicing rights for impairment using an independent valuation service. The vendors chosen by the Company are widely recognized vendors whose evaluations support the pricing functions of financial institutions, investment and mutual funds, and portfolio managers. The Company has documented and evaluated the pricing methodologies used by the vendors and maintains internal processes that regularly test valuations. These internal processes include obtaining and reviewing available reports on internal controls, evaluating the prices for reasonableness given market changes, obtaining and evaluating the inputs used in the model for a sample of securities, investigating anomalies and confirming determinations through discussions with the vendor. For investment securities, if needed, a broker may be utilized to determine the reported fair value. Further details on the methods used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments above are discussed below:
Investment Securities Available-for-Sale
. The fair value measurements consider observable data that may include dealer quotes, market spreads, cash flows, the U.S. Treasury yield curve, live trading levels, trade execution data, market consensus prepayment speeds, credit information and the investment's terms and conditions, among other things.
Mortgage Servicing Rights.
Mortgage servicing rights are initially recorded at fair value based on comparable market quotes and are amortized in proportion to and over the period of estimated net servicing income. Mortgage servicing rights are evaluated quarterly for impairment using an independent valuation service. The valuation service utilizes discounted cash flow modeling techniques, which consider observable data that includes market consensus prepayment speeds and the predominant risk characteristics of the underlying loans including loan type, note rate and loan term. Management believes the significant inputs utilized in the valuation model are observable in the market.
Additionally, from time to time, certain assets are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis. Adjustments to fair value generally result from the application of lower-of-cost-or-market accounting or write-downs of individual assets due to impairment.
The following table presents information about the Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis.
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
As of June 30, 2013
Balance
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
Significant Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Impaired loans
$
63,233
$
—
$
—
$
63,233
Other real estate owned
8,238
—
—
8,238
Long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale
1,327
—
—
1,327
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
As of December 31, 2012
Balance
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
Significant Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Impaired loans
$
74,623
$
—
$
—
$
74,623
Other real estate owned
15,745
—
—
15,745
Long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale
496
—
—
496
25
Table of Contents
FIRST INTERSTATE BANCSYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)
Impaired Loans.
Collateralized impaired loans are reported at the fair value of the underlying collateral if repayment is expected solely from collateral. The impaired loans are reported at fair value through specific valuation allowance allocations. In addition, when it is determined that the fair value of an impaired loan is less than the recorded investment in the loan, the carrying value of the loan is adjusted to fair value through a charge to the allowance for loan losses. Collateral values are estimated using independent appraisals and management estimates of current market conditions. As of
June 30, 2013
, certain impaired loans with a carrying value of $
91,287
were reduced by specific valuation allowance allocations of $
15,494
and partial loan charge-offs of $
12,561
resulting in a reported fair value of $
63,232
. As of
December 31, 2012
, certain impaired loans with a carrying value of $
107,247
were reduced by specific valuation allowance allocations of $
10,297
and partial loan charge-offs of $
22,327
resulting in a reported fair value of $
74,623
.
OREO.
The fair values of OREO are estimated using independent appraisals and management estimates of current market conditions. Upon initial recognition, write-downs based on the foreclosed asset's fair value at foreclosure are reported through charges to the allowance for loan losses. Periodically, the fair value of foreclosed assets is remeasured with any subsequent write-downs charged to OREO expense in the period in which they are identified. Write-downs of $
2,564
during the
six
months ended
June 30, 2013
included
$196
directly related to receipt of updated appraisals and
$2,368
based on management estimates of the current fair value of properties. Write-downs of $
1,147
during the
six
months ended
June 30, 2012
included adjustments of $
625
directly related to receipt of updated appraisals and $
522
based on management estimates of the current fair value of properties.
Long-lived Assets to be Disposed of by Sale.
Long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale are carried at the lower of carrying value or fair value less estimated costs to sell. The fair values of long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale are based upon observable market data and management estimates of current market conditions. As of
June 30, 2013
, the Company had long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale with a carrying value of $
2,014
that had been reduced by write-downs of $
687
resulting in a reported fair value of $
1,327
. As of
December 31, 2012
, the Company had a long-lived asset to be disposed of by sale with a carrying value of
$566
that was reduced by write-downs of
$70
charged to other expense resulting in a fair value of
$496
.
In addition, mortgage loans held for sale are required to be measured at the lower of cost or fair value. The fair value of mortgage loans held for sale is based upon binding contracts or quotes or bids from third party investors. As of
June 30, 2013
and
December 31, 2012
, all mortgage loans held for sale were recorded at cost.
The Company is required to disclose the fair value of financial instruments for which it is practical to estimate fair value. The methodologies for estimating the fair value of financial instruments that are measured at fair value on a recurring or non-recurring basis are discussed above. The methodologies for estimating the fair value of other financial instruments are discussed below. For financial instruments bearing a variable interest rate where no credit risk exists, it is presumed that recorded book values are reasonable estimates of fair value.
Financial Assets.
Carrying values of cash, cash equivalents and accrued interest receivable approximate fair values due to the liquid and/or short-term nature of these instruments. Fair values for investment securities held-to-maturity are obtained from an independent pricing service, which considers observable data that may include dealer quotes, market spreads, cash flows, the U.S. Treasury yield curve, live trading levels, trade execution data, market consensus prepayment speeds, credit information and the investment’s terms and conditions, among other things. Fair values of fixed rate loans and variable rate loans that reprice on an infrequent basis are estimated by discounting future cash flows using current interest rates at which similar loans with similar terms would be made to borrowers of similar credit quality. Carrying values of variable rate loans that reprice frequently, and with no change in credit risk, approximate the fair values of these instruments.
26
Table of Contents
FIRST INTERSTATE BANCSYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)
Financial Liabilities.
The fair values of demand deposits, savings accounts, securities sold under repurchase agreements and accrued interest payable are the amounts payable on demand at the reporting date. The fair values of fixed-maturity certificates of deposit are estimated using external market rates currently offered for deposits with similar remaining maturities. The carrying values of the interest bearing demand notes to the United States Treasury are deemed an approximation of fair values due to the frequent repayment and repricing at market rates. The fixed and floating rate subordinated debentures, floating rate subordinated term loan, notes payable to the FHLB, fixed rate subordinated term debt, and capital lease obligation are estimated by discounting future cash flows using current rates for advances with similar characteristics. The carrying value of the preferred stock pending redemption approximated fair value due to the short-term nature of the instrument.
Commitments to Extend Credit and Standby Letters of Credit.
The fair value of commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit, based on fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, is not significant.
The estimated fair values of financial instruments that are reported in the Company's consolidated balance sheets, segregated by the level of the valuation inputs within the fair value hierarchy utilized to measure fair value, are as follows:
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
As of June 30, 2013
Carrying Amount
Estimated
Fair Value
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
Significant Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
$
368,217
$
368,217
$
—
$
368,217
$
—
Investment securities available-for-sale
1,923,216
1,923,216
—
1,923,216
—
Investment securities held-to-maturity
215,323
219,028
—
219,028
—
Accrued interest receivable
29,272
29,272
—
29,272
—
Mortgage servicing rights, net
13,304
22,617
—
22,617
—
Net loans
4,198,836
4,159,610
—
4,096,377
63,233
Total financial assets
$
6,748,168
$
6,721,960
$
—
$
6,658,727
$
63,233
Financial liabilities:
Total deposits, excluding time deposits
$
4,642,704
$
4,642,704
$
—
$
4,642,704
$
—
Time deposits
1,287,628
1,296,077
—
1,296,077
—
Securities sold under repurchase agreements
421,314
421,314
—
421,314
—
Other borrowed funds
2
2
—
2
—
Accrued interest payable
6,236
6,236
—
6,236
—
Long-term debt
37,139
34,962
—
34,962
—
Subordinated debentures held by subsidiary
trusts
82,477
69,951
—
69,951
—
Total financial liabilities
$
6,477,500
$
6,471,246
$
—
$
6,471,246
$
—
27
Table of Contents
FIRST INTERSTATE BANCSYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
As of December 31, 2012
Carrying Amount
Estimated
Fair Value
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
Significant Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
$
801,332
$
801,332
$
—
$
801,332
$
—
Investment securities available-for-sale
1,995,258
1,995,258
—
1,995,258
—
Investment securities held-to-maturity
208,223
218,933
—
218,933
—
Accrued interest receivable
28,869
28,869
—
28,869
—
Mortgage servicing rights, net
12,653
16,373
—
16,373
—
Net loans
4,123,401
4,142,426
—
4,067,803
74,623
Total financial assets
$
7,169,736
$
7,203,191
$
—
$
7,128,568
$
74,623
Financial liabilities:
Total deposits, excluding time deposits
$
4,854,927
$
4,854,927
$
—
$
4,854,927
$
—
Time deposits
1,385,484
1,394,403
—
1,394,403
—
Securities sold under repurchase agreements
505,785
505,785
—
505,785
—
Other borrowed funds
32
32
—
32
—
Accrued interest payable
6,502
6,502
—
6,502
—
Long-term debt
37,160
35,104
—
35,104
—
Preferred stock pending redemption
50,000
50,000
50,000
Subordinated debentures held by subsidiary
trusts
82,477
62,409
—
62,409
—
Total financial liabilities
$
6,922,367
$
6,909,162
$
—
$
6,909,162
$
—
(14)
Recent Authoritative Accounting Guidance
ASU 2011-11, “Balance Sheet (Topic 210) - Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities.”
ASU 2011-11 amends Topic 210-Balance Sheet to require an entity to disclose both gross and net information about financial instruments that are eligible for offset in the statement of financial position and/or subject to a master netting arrangement or similar agreement. In January 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued ASU 2013-01, "Clarifying the Scope and Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities," to clarify that the scope of ASU 2011-11 applies to derivatives accounted for in accordance with Topic 815, including bifurcated embedded derivatives, repurchase agreements and reverse repurchase agreements, and securities borrowing and securities lending transactions that are either offset or subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement or similar agreement. ASU 2013-01 also clarifies that other types of financial assets and financial liabilities subject to a master netting arrangement or similar agreement are not subject to the provisions of ASU 2011-11. ASU 2011-11 and ASU 2013-01 became effective for the Company on January 1, 2013, and did not have a significant impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements, results of operations or liquidity.
ASU 2013-02 “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220) - Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income.”
ASU 2013-02 requires entities to provide information about amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by component. The amendments in ASU 2013-02 require entities to present, either on the face of the income statement or in the notes significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by the respective line items of net income but only if the amount reclassified is required by U.S. GAAP to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period. For other amounts that are not required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified in their entirety to net income, entities are required to cross-reference to other disclosures required under U.S. GAAP that provide additional detail about those amounts. ASU 2013-02 became effective for the Company on January 1, 2013, and did not have a significant impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements, results of operations or liquidity.
28
Table of Contents
FIRST INTERSTATE BANCSYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)
ASU 2013-04 "Obligations Resulting from Joint and Several Liability Arrangements for Which the Total Amount of the Obligation is Fixed at the Reporting Date.
" ASU 2013-04 requires an entity to measure obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements for which the total amount of the obligation is fixed at the reporting date as the sum of (a) the amount the reporting entity agreed to pay on the basis of its arrangement among its co-obligors and (b) any additional amount the reporting entity expects to pay on behalf of its co-obligors. The amendments in ASU 2013-04 also requires an entity to disclose the nature, amount and other information about those obligations. ASU 2013-04 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013, and is applied retrospectively to all prior periods presented. The Company does not expect amendments in ASU 2013-04 to impact the Company's consolidated financial statements, results of operations or liquidity.
ASU 2013-07 "Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205): Liquidation Basis of Accounting.
" ASU 2013-07 clarifies when an entity should apply the liquidation basis of accounting. ASU 2013-07 also provides principles for the recognition and measurement of assets and liabilities and requirements for financial statements prepared using the liquidation basis of accounting. ASU 2013-07 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2013. The Company does not expect amendments in ASU 2013-07 to impact the Company's consolidated financial statements, results of operations or liquidity.
ASU 2013-10 "Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Inclusion of the Fed Funds Effective Swap Rate (or Overnight INdex Swap Rate) as a Benchmark INterest Rate for Hedge Accounting Purposes."
The amendments in ASU 2013-10 permit the Fed Funds Effective Swap Rate to be used as a U.S. benchmark interest rate for hedge accounting purposes, in addition to interest rates on direct treasury obligations of the United States and the London Interbank Offered Rate. ASU 2013-10 is effective prospectively for qualifying new or redesigned hedging relationships entered into on or after July 17, 2013. The Company does not currently engage in derivatives or hedging activities; therefore, the amendments in ASU 2013-10 will not impact the Company's consolidated financial statements, results of operations or liquidity.
(15)
Subsequent Events
Subsequent events have been evaluated for potential recognition and disclosure through the date financial statements were filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. On
July 25, 2013
, the Company's Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend to common shareholders of
$
0.14
per share, to be paid on
August 15, 2013
to shareholders of record as of
August 5, 2013
. No other events requiring recognition or disclosure were identified.
29
Table of Contents
Item 2.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, including the audited financial statements contained therein, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC.
When we refer to “we,” “our,” and “us” in this report, we mean First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. and our consolidated subsidiaries, unless the context indicates that we refer only to the parent company, First Interstate BancSystem, Inc.
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements and Factors that Could Affect Future Results
This report contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Rule 175 promulgated thereunder, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Rule 3b-6 promulgated thereunder, that involve inherent risks and uncertainties. Any statements about our plans, objectives, expectations, strategies, beliefs, or future performance or events constitute forward-looking statements. Such statements are identified as those that include words or phrases such as “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “trend,” “objective,” “continue” or similar expressions or future or conditional verbs such as “will,” “would,” “should,” “could,” “might,” “may” or similar expressions. Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, assumptions, estimates and other important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from any results, performance or events expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. The following factors, among others, may cause actual results to differ materially from current expectations in the forward-looking statements, including those set forth in this press release: continuing or worsening economic conditions, adverse economic conditions affecting Montana, Wyoming and western South Dakota, credit losses, concentrations of real estate loans, commercial loan risk, adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, impairment of goodwill, changes in interest rates, access to low-cost funding sources, increases in deposit insurance premiums, repurchases of mortgage loans from or reimbursements to investors due to contractual or warranty breach, inability to grow business, governmental regulation and changes in regulatory, tax and accounting rules and interpretations, sweeping changes in regulation of financial institutions due to passage of the Dodd-Frank Act, changes in or noncompliance with governmental regulations, effects of recent legislative and regulatory efforts to stabilize financial markets, dependence on the Company’s management team, ability to attract and retain qualified employees, failure of technology, reliance on external vendors, inability to meet liquidity requirements, lack of acquisition candidates, failure to manage growth, competition, inability to manage risks in turbulent and dynamic market conditions, ineffective internal operational controls, environmental remediation and other costs, litigation pertaining to fiduciary responsibilities, failure to effectively implement technology-driven products and services, capital required to support the Company’s bank subsidiary, soundness of other financial institutions, impact of proposed Basel III capital standards for U.S. banks, inability of our bank subsidiary to pay dividends, implementation of new lines of business or new product or service offerings, change in dividend policy, lack of public market for our Class A common stock, volatility of Class A common stock, voting control of Class B stockholders, decline in market price of Class A common stock, dilution as a result of future equity issuances, uninsured nature of any investment in Class A common stock, anti-takeover provisions, controlled company status and subordination of common stock to Company debt.
A more detailed discussion of each of the foregoing risks is included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, filed March 1, 2013. These factors and the other risk factors described in the Company's periodic and current reports filed with the SEC from time to time, however, are not necessarily all of the important factors that could cause the Company's actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed in or implied by any of the Company's forward-looking statements. Other unknown or unpredictable factors also could harm the Company's results. Investors and others are encouraged to read the more detailed discussion of the Company's risks contained in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.
All forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements set forth above. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made and we do not undertake or assume any obligation to update publicly any of these statements to reflect actual results, new information or future events, changes in assumptions or changes in other factors affecting forward-looking statements, except to the extent required by applicable laws. If we update one or more forward-looking statements, no inference should be drawn that we will make additional updates with respect to those or other forward-looking statements.
30
Table of Contents
Executive Overview
We are a financial and bank holding company headquartered in Billings, Montana. As of June 30, 2013, we had consolidated assets of
$7,292 million
, deposits of
$5,930 million
, loans of
$4,297 million
and total stockholders’ equity of
$770 million
. We currently operate 74 banking offices, including detached drive-up facilities, in 41 communities located in Montana, Wyoming and western South Dakota. Through the Bank, we deliver a comprehensive range of banking products and services to individuals, businesses, municipalities and other entities throughout our market areas. Our customers participate in a wide variety of industries, including energy, tourism, agriculture, healthcare, professional services, education, governmental services, construction, mining, retail and wholesale trade.
Our Business
Our principal business activity is lending to and accepting deposits from individuals, businesses, municipalities and other entities. We derive our income principally from interest charged on loans and, to a lesser extent, from interest and dividends earned on investments. We also derive income from non-interest sources such as fees received in connection with various lending and deposit services; trust, employee benefit, investment and insurance services; mortgage loan originations, sales and servicing; merchant and electronic banking services; and from time to time, gains on sales of assets. Our principal expenses include interest expense on deposits and borrowings, operating expenses, provisions for loan losses and income tax expense.
Our loan portfolio consists of a mix of real estate, consumer, commercial, agricultural and other loans, including fixed and variable rate loans. Our real estate loans comprise commercial real estate, construction (including residential, commercial and land development loans), residential, agricultural and other real estate loans. Fluctuations in the loan portfolio are directly related to the economies of the communities we serve. While each loan originated generally must meet minimum underwriting standards established in our credit policies, lending officers are granted discretion within pre-approved limits in approving and pricing loans to assure that the banking offices are responsive to competitive issues and community needs in each market area. We fund our loan portfolio primarily with the core deposits from our customers, generally without utilizing brokered deposits and with minimal reliance on wholesale funding sources.
Recent Trends and Developments
Basel III Regulatory Capital Rule Revision
On July 2, 2013, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Bank, or the Board, issued a final rule implementing a revised regulatory capital framework for U.S. banks in accordance with the Basel III international accord and satisfying related mandates under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. Under the final rule, minimum capital requirements will increase for both quantity and quality of capital held by banking organizations. The final rule includes a new common equity tier 1 minimum capital requirement of 4.5% of risk-weighted assets and increases the minimum tier 1 capital requirement from 4.0% to 6.0% of risk-weighted assets. The minimum total risk-based capital remains unchanged at 8.0% of total risk-weighted assets. In addition to the minimum common equity tier 1, tier 1 and total risk-based capital requirements, the final rule requires banking organizations to hold a buffer of common equity tier 1 capital in an amount above 2.5% of total risk-weighted assets to avoid restrictions on capital distributions and discretionary bonus payments to executive officers.
The final rule also establishes a standardized approach for determining risk-weighted assets. Under the final rule, risk weights for residential mortgage loans that apply under current capital rules will continue to apply and banking organizations with less than $15 billion in total assets may continue to include existing trust preferred securities as capital. The final rule allows banking organizations that are not subject to the advanced approaches rule, like us, to make a one-time election not to include most elements of accumulated other comprehensive income in regulatory capital and instead use the existing treatment under current capital rules.
The minimum regulatory capital requirements and compliance with a standardized approach for determining risk-weighted assets of the final rule are effective for us on January 1, 2015. The capital conservation buffer framework transition period begins January 1, 2016, with full implementation effective January 1, 2019. Our initial calculations indicate that as of June 30, 2013, we would meet all fully phased-in Basel III capital adequacy requirements.
The final rule also enhances the risk-sensitivity of the advanced approaches risk-based capital rule, including among others, revisions to better address counterparty credit risk and interconnectedness among financial institutions and incorporation of the Board's market risk rule into the integrated capital framework. These provisions of the final rule generally apply only to large, internationally active banking organizations or banking organizations with significant trading activity and do not directly impact us.
31
Table of Contents
Universal Shelf Registration Statement
On May 24, 2013, we filed a universal shelf registration statement on Form S-3 with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The registration statement is designed to provide us with greater flexibility to raise additional capital for general corporate purposes, including, but not limited to, repayment or refinancing of outstanding debt and the acquisition of additional businesses or technologies. The registration statement permits us to offer and sell up to $160 million of our Class A common shares in one or more future public offerings. At the present time, we have no specific use for proceeds or plans to offer any of the securities covered by the registration statement.
Asset Quality
Non-performing assets decreased to $128 million, or 2.97% of total loans and OREO, as of June 30, 2013, from $143 million, or 3.35% of total loans and OREO as of December 31, 2012, primarily due to the sale of OREO properties with carrying values aggregating $16 million and the movement of non-accrual loans out of the loan portfolio through pay-off, charge-off or foreclosure. During second quarter 2013, we had recoveries, net of charge-offs, of $249 thousand, compared to net charge-offs of $3 million during first quarter 2013 and $25 million during second quarter 2012.
The provision for loan losses decreased $11.6 million, or 96.9%, to $375 thousand for the three months ended June 30, 2013, as compared to $12.0 million for the same period in 2012, and $22.4 million, or 96.2%, to $875 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2013, as compared to $23.3 million during the same period in 2012. These decreases are reflective of improvement in local and national economic trends, continued improvement in and stabilization of credit quality as evidenced by continuing declining levels of non-performing assets and criticized loans and unusually high levels of recoveries of previously charged-off loans.
As of January 1, 2013, we no longer present accruing loans modified in troubled debt restructurings as non-performing loans. While still considered impaired under applicable accounting guidance, these loans are performing as agreed under their modified terms and management expects performance to continue. Prior period balances and ratios have been adjusted to reflect this change.
Primary Factors Used in Evaluating Our Business
As a banking institution, we manage and evaluate various aspects of both our financial condition and our results of operations. We monitor our financial condition and performance on a monthly basis at our holding company, at the Bank and at each banking office. We evaluate the levels and trends of the line items included in our balance sheet and statements of income, as well as various financial ratios that are commonly used in our industry. We analyze these ratios and financial trends against both our own historical levels and the financial condition and performance of comparable banking institutions in our region and nationally.
Results of Operations
Principal factors used in managing and evaluating our results of operations include return on average assets, net interest income, non-interest income, non-interest expense and net income. Net interest income is affected by the level of interest rates, changes in interest rates and changes in the volume and composition of interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities. The most significant impact on our net interest income between periods is derived from the interaction of changes in the rates earned or paid on interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities, which we refer to as interest rate spread. The volume of loans, investment securities and other interest earning assets, compared to the volume of interest bearing deposits and indebtedness, combined with the interest rate spread, produces changes in our net interest income between periods. Non-interest bearing sources of funds, such as demand deposits and stockholders’ equity, also support earning assets. The impact of free funding sources is captured in the net interest margin, which is calculated as net interest income divided by average earning assets. We evaluate our net interest income on factors that include the yields on our loans and other earning assets, the costs of our deposits and other funding sources, the levels of our net interest spread and net interest margin and the provisions for loan losses required to maintain our allowance for loan losses at an adequate level.
We seek to increase our non-interest income over time and we evaluate our non-interest income relative to the trends of the individual types of non-interest income in view of prevailing market conditions.
We manage our non-interest expenses in consideration of growth opportunities and our community banking model that emphasizes customer service and responsiveness. We evaluate our non-interest expense on factors that include our non-interest expense relative to our average assets, our efficiency ratio and the trends of the individual categories of non-interest expense.
32
Table of Contents
Finally, we seek to increase our net income and provide favorable shareholder returns over time, and we evaluate our net income relative to the performance of other bank holding companies on factors that include return on average assets, return on average equity, total shareholder return and growth in earnings.
Financial Condition
Principal areas of focus in managing and evaluating our financial condition include liquidity, the diversification and quality of our loans, the adequacy of our allowance for loan losses, the diversification and terms of our deposits and other funding sources, the re-pricing characteristics and maturities of our assets and liabilities, including potential interest rate exposure and the adequacy of our capital levels. We seek to maintain sufficient levels of cash and investment securities to meet potential payment and funding obligations, and we evaluate our liquidity on factors that include the levels of cash and highly liquid assets relative to our liabilities, the quality and maturities of our investment securities, the ratio of loans to deposits and any reliance on brokered certificates of deposit or other wholesale funding sources.
We seek to grow a diverse and high quality loan portfolio and evaluate our asset quality on factors that include the allocation of our loans among loan types, credit exposure to any single borrower or industry type, non-performing assets as a percentage of total loans and OREO, and loan charge-offs as a percentage of average loans. We seek to maintain our allowance for loan losses at a level adequate to absorb probable losses inherent in our loan portfolio at each balance sheet date, and we evaluate the level of our allowance for loan losses relative to our overall loan portfolio and the level of non-performing loans and potential charge-offs.
We seek to fund our assets primarily using core customer deposits spread among various deposit categories, and we evaluate our deposit and funding mix on factors that include the allocation of our deposits among deposit types, the level of our non-interest bearing deposits, the ratio of our core deposits to our total deposits and our reliance on brokered deposits or other wholesale funding sources, such as borrowings from other banks or agencies. We seek to manage the mix, maturities and re-pricing characteristics of our assets and liabilities to maintain relative stability of our net interest rate margin in a changing interest rate environment, and we evaluate our asset-liability management using models to evaluate the changes to our net interest income under different interest rate scenarios.
Finally, we seek to maintain adequate capital levels to absorb unforeseen operating losses and to help support the growth of our balance sheet. We evaluate our capital adequacy using the regulatory and financial capital ratios including leverage capital ratio, tier 1 risk-based capital ratio, total risk-based capital ratio, tangible common equity to tangible assets and tier 1 common capital to total risk-weighted assets.
Critical Accounting Estimates and Significant Accounting Policies
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and follow general practices within the industries in which we operate. Application of these principles requires management to make estimates, assumptions and judgments that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. The most significant accounting policies we follow are summarized in Notes 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.
Our critical accounting estimates are summarized below. Management considers an accounting estimate to be critical if: (1) the accounting estimate requires management to make particularly difficult, subjective and/or complex judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain and (2) changes in the estimate that are reasonably likely to occur from period to period, or the use of different estimates that management could have reasonably used in the current period, would have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements, results of operations or liquidity.
Allowance for Loan Losses
The provision for loan losses creates an allowance for loan losses known and inherent in the loan portfolio at each balance sheet date. The allowance for loan losses represents management’s estimate of probable credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio.
We perform a quarterly assessment of the risks inherent in our loan portfolio, as well as a detailed review of each significant loan with identified weaknesses. Based on this analysis, we record a provision for loan losses in order to maintain the allowance for loan losses at appropriate levels. In determining the allowance for loan losses, we estimate losses on specific loans, or groups of loans, where the probable loss can be identified and reasonably determined. Determining the amount of the allowance for loan losses is considered a critical accounting estimate because it requires significant judgment and the use of subjective measurements, including management’s assessment of the internal risk classifications of loans, historical loan loss rates, changes
33
Table of Contents
in the nature of the loan portfolio, overall portfolio quality, industry concentrations, delinquency trends and the impact of current local, regional and national economic factors on the quality of the loan portfolio. Changes in these estimates and assumptions are possible and may have a material impact on our allowance, and therefore our consolidated financial statements or results of operations. The allowance for loan losses is maintained at an amount we believe is sufficient to provide for estimated losses inherent in our loan portfolio at each balance sheet date, and fluctuations in the provision for loan losses result from management’s assessment of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. Management monitors qualitative and quantitative trends in the loan portfolio, including changes in the levels of past due, internally classified and non-performing loans. Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 describes the methodology used to determine the allowance for loan losses. A discussion of the factors driving changes in the amount of the allowance for loan losses is included herein under the heading “Asset Quality."
Goodwill
The excess purchase price over the fair value of net assets from acquisitions, or goodwill, is evaluated for impairment at least annually and on an interim basis if an event or circumstance indicates that it is likely impairment has occurred. In any given year, the Company may elect to perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is in excess of its carrying value. If it is not more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is in excess of the carrying value, or if the Company elects to bypass the qualitative assessment, a two-step quantitative impairment test is performed. In performing a quantitative test for impairment, the fair value of net assets is estimated based on an analysis of our market value, discounted cash flows and peer values. Determining the fair value of goodwill is considered a critical accounting estimate because of its sensitivity to market-based economics. In addition, any allocation of the fair value of goodwill to assets and liabilities requires significant management judgment and the use of subjective measurements. Variability in market conditions and key assumptions or subjective measurements used to estimate and allocate fair value are reasonably possible and could have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements or results of operations. Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 describes our accounting policy with regard to goodwill.
Our annual evaluation of goodwill for impairment is performed as of July 1st each year. Upon completion of the most recent evaluation, it was determined that the estimated fair value of net assets was greater than carrying value of the Company. We will continue to monitor our performance and evaluate our goodwill for impairment annually or more frequently as needed.
Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis is intended to provide greater details of the results of our operations and financial condition.
Net Interest Income.
During second quarter 2013, our net interest income on a fully-taxable equivalent, or FTE, basis decreased $2.5 million, or 4.0%, to $59.9 million, as compared to $62.4 million the same period in 2012, and and our net FTE interest margin ratio decreased 18 basis points to 3.56%, as compared to 3.74% during the same period in 2012. For the six months ended June 30, 2013, our net FTE interest income decreased $3.9 million, or 3.1%, to $120.3 million, as compared to $124.2 million during the same period in 2012, and our net FTE interest margin ratio decreased 18 basis points to 3.55%, as compared to 3.73% during the same period in 2012. Declines in yields earned on our loan and investment portfolios during the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 were partially offset by increases in average outstanding loans and investment securities, reductions in the cost of interest bearing liabilities and lower average outstanding interest bearing deposits in banks. Also offsetting the impact of lower asset yields during the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, as compared to the same period in 2012, was the December 2012 contractual repricing of $46 million of junior subordinated debentures from a weighted average fixed interest rate of 7.07% to variable rates averaging 2.60% over LIBOR.
34
Table of Contents
The following tables present, for the periods indicated, condensed average balance sheet information, together with interest income and yields earned on average interest earning assets and interest expense and rates paid on average interest bearing liabilities.
Average Balance Sheets, Yields and Rates
(Dollars in thousands)
Three Months Ended June 30,
2013
2012
Average
Balance
Interest
Average
Rate
Average
Balance
Interest
Average
Rate
Interest earning assets:
Loans (1) (2)
$
4,256,579
$
55,270
5.21
%
$
4,159,565
$
58,564
5.66
%
Investment securities (2)
2,153,342
9,588
1.79
2,094,148
11,414
2.19
Interest bearing deposits in banks
335,761
212
0.25
442,698
279
0.25
Federal funds sold
3,322
5
0.60
3,668
6
0.66
Total interest earnings assets
6,749,004
65,075
3.87
6,700,079
70,263
4.22
Non-earning assets
601,023
633,454
Total assets
$
7,350,027
$
7,333,533
Interest bearing liabilities:
Demand deposits
$
1,722,138
$
475
0.11
%
$
1,596,076
$
606
0.15
%
Savings deposits
1,544,648
598
0.16
1,482,986
934
0.25
Time deposits
1,312,863
2,965
0.91
1,496,597
4,239
1.14
Repurchase agreements
466,533
74
0.06
493,450
152
0.12
Other borrowed funds
10
—
—
33
—
—
Preferred stock pending redemption
—
—
—
—
—
—
Long-term debt
37,142
483
5.22
37,184
495
5.35
Subordinated debentures held by by subsidiary trusts
82,477
601
2.92
120,996
1,467
4.88
Total interest bearing liabilities
5,165,811
5,196
0.40
5,227,322
7,893
0.61
Non-interest bearing deposits
1,356,133
1,277,091
Other non-interest bearing liabilities
49,323
47,781
Stockholders’ equity
$
778,760
$
781,339
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
7,350,027
7,333,533
Net FTE interest income
59,879
62,370
Less FTE adjustments (2)
$
(1,119
)
$
(1,196
)
Net interest income from consolidated statements of income
58,760
61,174
Interest rate spread
3.47
%
3.61
%
Net FTE interest margin (3)
3.56
%
3.74
%
Cost of funds, including non-interest bearing demand deposits (4)
0.32
%
0.49
%
(1)
Average loan balances include non-accrual loans. Interest income on loans includes amortization of deferred loan fees net of deferred loan costs, which is not material.
(2)
Interest income and average rates for tax exempt loans and securities are presented on a FTE basis.
(3)
Net FTE interest margin during the period equals (i) the difference between annualized interest income on interest earning assets and the annualized interest expense on interest bearing liabilities, divided by (ii) average interest earning assets for the period.
(4)
Calculated by dividing total annualized interest on interest bearing liabilities by the sum of total interest bearing liabilities plus non-interest bearing deposits.
35
Table of Contents
Average Balance Sheets, Yields and Rates
(Dollars in thousands)
Six Months Ended June 30,
2013
2012
Average
Balance
Interest
Average
Rate
Average
Balance
Interest
Average
Rate
Interest earning assets:
Loans (1) (2)
$
4,236,866
$
111,184
5.29
%
$
4,162,384
$
116,938
5.65
%
Investment securities (2)
2,178,758
19,567
1.81
2,118,793
23,018
2.18
Interest bearing deposits in banks
405,919
510
0.25
408,799
516
0.25
Federal funds sold
2,924
9
0.62
2,139
7
0.66
Total interest earnings assets
6,824,467
131,270
3.88
6,692,115
140,479
4.22
Non-earning assets
599,661
626,295
Total assets
$
7,424,128
$
7,318,410
Interest bearing liabilities:
Demand deposits
$
1,725,457
$
949
0.11
%
$
1,589,440
$
1,253
0.16
%
Savings deposits
1,547,381
1,251
0.16
1,466,113
1,948
0.27
Time deposits
1,338,903
6,193
0.93
1,518,693
8,840
1.17
Repurchase agreements
489,230
174
0.07
503,428
308
0.12
Other borrowed funds
9
—
—
34
—
—
Long-term debt
37,148
963
5.23
37,189
993
5.37
Preferred stock pending redemption
4,696
159
6.83
—
—
—
Subordinated debentures held by by subsidiary trusts
82,477
1,297
3.17
122,356
2,974
4.89
Total interest bearing liabilities
5,225,301
10,986
0.42
5,237,253
16,316
0.63
Non-interest bearing deposits
1,377,374
1,254,983
Other non-interest bearing liabilities
51,554
48,926
Stockholders’ equity
$
769,899
$
777,248
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
7,424,128
7,318,410
Net FTE interest income
120,284
124,163
Less FTE adjustments (2)
$
(2,247
)
$
(2,355
)
Net interest income from consolidated statements of income
118,037
121,808
Interest rate spread
3.46
%
3.59
%
Net FTE interest margin (3)
3.55
%
3.73
%
Cost of funds, including non-interest bearing demand deposits (4)
0.34
%
0.51
%
(1)
Average loan balances include non-accrual loans. Interest income on loans includes amortization of deferred loan fees net of deferred loan costs, which is not material.
(2)
Interest income and average rates for tax exempt loans and securities are presented on a FTE basis.
(3)
Net FTE interest margin during the period equals (i) the difference between annualized interest income on interest earning assets and the annualized interest expense on interest bearing liabilities, divided by (ii) average interest earning assets for the period.
(4)
Calculated by dividing total annualized interest on interest bearing liabilities by the sum of total interest bearing liabilities plus non-interest bearing deposits.
36
Table of Contents
The table below sets forth, for the periods indicated, a summary of the changes in interest income and interest expense resulting from estimated changes in average asset and liability balances (volume) and estimated changes in average interest rates (rate). Changes which are not due solely to volume or rate have been allocated to these categories based on the respective percent changes in average volume and average rate as they compare to each other.
Analysis of Interest Changes Due to Volume and Rates
(Dollars in thousands)
Three Months Ended June 30, 2013
compared with
Three Months Ended June 30, 2012
Six Months Ended June 30, 2013
compared with
Six Months Ended June 30, 2012
Volume
Rate
Net
Volume
Rate
Net
Interest earning assets:
Loans (1)
$
1,366
$
(4,660
)
$
(3,294
)
$
2,092
$
(7,846
)
$
(5,754
)
Investment securities (1)
323
(2,149
)
(1,826
)
651
(4,102
)
(3,451
)
Interest bearing deposits in banks
(67
)
—
(67
)
(4
)
(2
)
(6
)
Federal funds sold
(1
)
—
(1
)
3
(1
)
2
Total change
1,621
(6,809
)
(5,188
)
2,742
(11,951
)
(9,209
)
Interest bearing liabilities:
Demand deposits
48
(179
)
(131
)
107
(411
)
(304
)
Savings deposits
39
(375
)
(336
)
108
(805
)
(697
)
Time deposits
(520
)
(754
)
(1,274
)
(1,047
)
(1,600
)
(2,647
)
Repurchase agreements
(8
)
(70
)
(78
)
(9
)
(125
)
(134
)
Long-term debt
(1
)
(11
)
(12
)
(1
)
(29
)
(30
)
Preferred stock pending redemption
—
—
—
—
159
159
Subordinated debentures
(467
)
(399
)
(866
)
(969
)
(708
)
(1,677
)
Total change
(909
)
(1,788
)
(2,697
)
(1,811
)
(3,519
)
(5,330
)
Increase (decrease) in FTE net interest income
$
2,530
$
(5,021
)
$
(2,491
)
$
4,553
$
(8,432
)
$
(3,879
)
(1)
Interest income for tax exempt loans and securities are presented on a FTE basis.
Provision for Loan Losses.
The provision for loan losses decreased $11.6 million, or 96.9%, to $375 thousand for the three months ended June 30, 2013, as compared to $12.0 million for the same period in 2012, and $22.4 million, or 96.2%, to $875 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2013, as compared to $23.3 million during the same period in 2012. These decreases are reflective of improvement in local and national economic trends, continued improvement in and stabilization of credit quality as evidenced by continuing declining levels of non-performing assets and criticized loans and unusually high levels of recoveries of previously charged-off loans. For information regarding our non-performing loans, see “Non-Performing Assets” included herein.
Non-interest Income.
Our principal sources of non-interest income include other service charges, commissions and fees; income from the origination and sale of loans; service charges on deposit accounts; and, wealth management revenues. Non-interest income increased $1.9 million, or 6.9%, to $29.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013, as compared to $27.7 million for the same period in 2012, and $4.4 million, or 8.1%, to $58.4 million during the six months ended June 30, 2013, as compared to $54.0 million during the same period in 2012. Significant components of these increases are discussed below.
Fluctuations in market interest rates have a significant impact on the level of income from the origination and sale of loans. Higher interest rates can reduce the demand for home loans and loans to refinance existing mortgages. Conversely, lower interest rates generally stimulate refinancing and home loan origination activity. Income from the origination and sale of loans increased $623 thousand, or 6.6%, to $10.0 million during the three months ended June 30, 2013, compared to $9.4 million during the same period in 2012, and $2.9 million, or 16.4%, to $20.7 million during the six months ended June 30, 2013, as compared to $17.8 million during the same period in 2012, primarily due to a continuing low interest rate environment. For the six months ended June 30, 2013, mortgage loan origination was flat, as compared to the same period in 2012, with loans originated for home purchases accounting for approximately 43% of the Company's mortgage loan production, compared to approximately 35% during the same period in 2012.
37
Table of Contents
Other service charges, commissions and fees primarily include debit and credit card interchange income, mortgage servicing fees, insurance and other commissions and ATM service charge revenues. Other service charges, commissions and fees increased $723 thousand, or 8.8%, to $9.0 million during the three months ended June 30, 2013, as compared to $8.3 million during the same period in 2012, primarily due to higher debit and credit card interchange revenue resulting from higher transaction volumes. Other service charges, commissions and fees increased $555 thousand, or 3.3%, to $17.2 million during the six months ended June 30, 2013, as compared to $16.7 million during the same period in 2012, primarily due to higher credit card interchange revenue resulting from higher transaction volumes.
Wealth management revenues are comprised principally of fees earned for management of trust assets and investment services revenues. Fees earned for management of trust assets are generally based on the market value of assets managed. Wealth management revenues increased $205 thousand, or 5.4%, to $4.0 million during the three months ended June 30, 2013, as compared to $3.8 million during the same period in 2012, and increased $1.1 million, or 14.9%, to $8.2 million during the six months ended June 30, 2013, as compared to $7.1 million during the same period in 2012. These increases were primarily due to the addition of new wealth management customers, increases in the market values of new and existing assets under trust management and increases in brokerage revenues.
Other income increased $708 thousand, or 46.6%, to $2.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013, compared to $1.5 million for the same period in 2012, and $287 thousand, or 7.9% to $3.9 million during the six months ended June 30, 2013, as compared to $3.6 million during the same period in 2012. Increases in other income during the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, as compared to the same periods in 2012, were primarily due to proceeds from company owned life insurance combined with increases in earnings on securities held under deferred compensation plans, which were partially offset by a $581 thousand gain on the sale of a bank building recorded during second quarter 2012.
Non-interest Expense.
Non-interest expense decreased $2.3 million, or 4.0%, to $55.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013, as compared to $57.3 million for the same period in 2012, and $3.0 million, or 2.6%, to $111.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, as compared to $114.7 million for the same period in 2012. Significant components of these decreases are discussed below.
Salaries and wages increased $1.8 million, or 8.5%, to $23.5 million during the three months ended June 30, 2013, as compared to $21.6 million during the same period in 2012, and $3.7 million, or 8.5%, to $46.9 million during the six months ended June 30, 2013, as compared to $43.2 million during the same period in 2012, primarily due to higher incentive bonus accruals reflective of our improved performance.
Employee benefits expense increased $727 thousand, or 10.7%, to $7.5 million during the three months ended June 30, 2013, as compared to $6.8 million during same period in 2012, primarily due to increases in the market value of securities held under deferred compensation plans. Employee benefits expense decreased $64 thousand, or less than 1.0%, to $15.7 million during the six months ended June 30, 2013, as compared to $15.8 million during the same period in 2012. During the six months ended June 30, 2013, as compared to the same period in 2012, increases in the market values of securities held under deferred compensation plans were more than offset by decreases in payroll taxes and a $500 thousand reduction in group health insurance expense reflective of favorable claims experience.
FDIC insurance premiums decreased $245 thousand, or 15.3%, to $1.4 million during the three months ended June 30, 2013, as compared to $1.6 million for the same period in 2012, and decreased $463 thousand, or 14.5%, to $2.7 million during the six months ended June 30, 2013, as compared to $3.2 million during the same period in 2012. These decreases were primarily due to lower assessment rates and a lower deposit insurance assessment base.
Variations in net OREO income or expense between periods were primarily due to fluctuations in write-downs of the estimated fair value of OREO properties, net gains and losses recorded on the sales of OREO properties and carrying costs and/or operating expenses of OREO properties. During the three months ended June 30, 2103, we recorded net OREO income of $915 thousand, as compared to net OREO expense of $1.8 million during the same period in 2012. The shift from net OREO expense during second quarter 2012 to net OREO income during second quarter 2013 was primarily due to increases in net gains recorded on the sale of OREO properties combined with decreases in operating costs. During second quarter 2013, we sold OREO properties with carrying values aggregating $13 million at a net gain of $1.9 million, compared to sales of OREO properties with carrying values aggregating $10 million at a net gain of $75 thousand during second quarter 2012.
38
Table of Contents
OREO expense, net of income, decreased $1.9 million, or 66.3%, to $981 thousand during the six months ended June 30, 2013, as compared to $2.9 million for the same period in 2012. Increases in write-downs of the estimated fair value of OREO properties during the six months ended June 30, 2013, as compared to the same period in 2012, were more than offset by higher gains recorded on the sale of OREO properties and decreases in operating expenses. During the six months ended June 30, 2013, net OREO expense included $1.1 million of net operating expenses, $2.6 million of fair value write-downs and net gains of $2.7 million on the sale of OREO properties. This compares to $1.8 million of net operating expenses, $1.1 million of fair value write-downs and net gains of $6 thousand during the same period in 2012.
Mortgage servicing rights are evaluated quarterly for impairment. Fluctuations in the fair value of mortgage servicing rights are primarily due to changes in assumptions regarding prepayments of the underlying mortgage loans, which typically correspond with changes in market interest rates. During second quarter 2013, we reversed impairment of $11 thousand, as compared to impairment charges of $52 thousand during second quarter 2012. During the six months ended June 30, 2013, we reversed impairment of $59 thousand, as compared to an impairment reversal of $816 thousand during the same period in 2012.
Other expenses primarily include advertising and public relations costs; office supply, postage, freight and telephone expenses; travel expense; donations expense; debit and credit card expenses; board of director fees; and other losses. Other expenses decreased $1.9 million, or 13.5%, to $11.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013, as compared to $13.8 million during the same period in 2012, and $5.0 million, or 18.4%, to $22.3 million during the six months ended June 30, 2013, as compared to $27.3 million during the same period in 2012. Increases in other expense due to the $616 thousand write-down in the carrying value of long-lived assets pending disposal recorded during second quarter 2013 were more than offset by non-recurring charges recorded during 2012. During second quarter 2012, we recorded donation expense of $1.5 million associated with the sale of a bank building to a charitable organization and wrote-off $428 thousand of unamortized issuance costs associated with redeemed junior subordinated debentures. In addition, during first quarter 2012, we accrued $3.0 million of collection and settlement costs related to one borrower.
Income Tax Expense.
Our effective federal income tax rate was 30.6% for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 28.8% for the six months ended June 30, 2012. State income tax applies primarily to pretax earnings generated within Montana and South Dakota. Our effective state tax rate was 4.3% for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 4.6% for the six months ended June 30, 2012. Changes in the effective federal income tax rates were primarily fluctuations in tax exempt interest income as a percentage of total income.
Financial Condition
Total assets decreased $430 million, or 5.6%, to $7,292 million as of June 30, 2013, from $7,722 million as of December 31, 2012.
Loans.
Total loans increased $73 million, or 1.7%, to $4,297 million as of June 30, 2013, from $4,224 million as of December 31, 2012, with the most notable growth occurring in residential real estate and consumer loans. Residential real estate loans increased to $804 million as of June 30, 2013, from $708 million as of December 31, 2012, due primarily to continued retention of certain residential loans with contractual terms of fifteen years or less.
Consumer loans grew to $653 million as of June 30, 2013, from $637 million as of December 31, 2012. Growth in consumer loans occurred primarily in indirect loans, which increased to $457 million as of June 30, 2013, from $438 million as of December 31, 2012, due to expansion of the Company's indirect lending program within its existing market areas.
Commercial and commercial real estate loans decreased as of June 30, 2103, as compared to December 31, 2012. Commercial loans decreased to $681 million as of June 30, 2013, from $689 million as of December 31, 2012, and commercial real estate loans decreased to $1,447 million as of June 30, 2013, from $1,497 million as of December 31, 2012, primarily due to weak loan demand combined with the movement of lower quality loans out of the portfolio through charge-off, pay-off and foreclosure.
39
Table of Contents
Non-performing Assets.
Non-performing assets include non-accrual loans, loans contractually past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest and OREO. The following table sets forth information regarding non-performing assets as of the dates indicated:
Nonperforming Assets
(Dollars in thousands)
June 30,
2013
March 31,
2013
December 31,
2012
September 30,
2012
June 30,
2012
Non-performing loans:
Non-accrual loans
$
103,729
$
98,594
$
107,799
$
122,931
$
129,923
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more
1,742
1,941
2,277
4,339
6,451
Total non-performing loans
105,471
100,535
110,076
127,270
136,374
OREO
22,782
32,470
32,571
39,971
53,817
Total non-performing assets
$
128,253
$
133,005
$
142,647
$
167,241
$
190,191
Non-performing loans to total loans
2.45
%
2.38
%
2.61
%
3.04
%
3.27
%
Non-performing assets to total loans and OREO
2.97
%
3.12
%
3.35
%
3.96
%
4.50
%
Non-performing assets to total assets
1.76
%
1.79
%
1.85
%
2.24
%
2.60
%
Non-performing loans
. Non-performing loans include non-accrual loans and loans contractually past due 90 days or more. We monitor and evaluate collateral values on non-performing loans quarterly. Appraisals are required on all non-performing loans every 18-24 months, or sooner as conditions necessitate. We monitor real estate values by market for our larger market areas. Based on trends in real estate values, adjustments may be made to the appraised value based on time elapsed between the appraisal date and the impairment analysis or a new appraisal may be ordered. Appraised values in our smaller market areas may be adjusted based on trends identified through discussions with local realtors and appraisers. Appraisals are also adjusted for selling costs. The adjusted appraised value is then compared to the loan balance and any resulting shortfall is recorded in the allowance for loan losses as a specific valuation allowance. Overall increases in specific valuation allowances will result in higher provisions for loan losses. Provisions for loan losses are also impacted by changes in the historical or general valuation elements of the allowance for loan losses as well.
The following table sets forth the allocation of our non-performing loans among our various loan categories as of the dates indicated:
Non-Performing Loans by Loan Type
(Dollars in thousands)
June 30, 2013
Percent
of Total
December 31,
2012
Percent
of Total
Real estate:
Commercial
$
46,062
43.7
%
$
50,517
45.8
%
Construction:
.
Land acquisition and development
16,349
15.5
%
19,628
17.8
%
Commercial
6,192
5.9
%
8,126
7.4
%
Residential
1,526
1.4
%
2,175
2.0
%
Total construction
24,067
22.8
%
29,929
27.2
%
Residential
8,246
7.8
%
11,511
10.5
%
Agricultural
9,773
9.3
%
5,048
4.6
%
Total real estate
88,148
83.6
%
97,005
88.1
%
Consumer
1,392
1.3
%
1,727
1.6
%
Commercial
15,804
15.0
%
10,812
9.8
%
Agricultural
127
0.1
%
525
0.5
%
Other
—
—
%
7
—
%
Total non-performing loans
$
105,471
100.0
%
$
110,076
100.0
%
40
Table of Contents
Non-accrual loans.
We generally place loans on non-accrual when they become 90 days past due, unless they are well secured and in the process of collection. When a loan is placed on non-accrual status, any interest previously accrued but not collected is reversed from income. If all loans on non-accrual had been current in accordance with their original terms, gross income of approximately $318 thousand and $584 thousand would have been accrued for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. If all loans on non-accrual had been current in accordance with their original terms, gross income of approximately $655 thousand and $1.2 million would have been accrued for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
Non-accrual loans, the largest component of non-performing loans, decreased $4 million, or 3.8%, to $104 million at June 30, 2013 from $108 million at December 31, 2012, primarily due to movement of non-accrual loans out of the loan portfolio due to pay-off, charge-off or foreclosure.
OREO
. OREO consists of real property acquired through foreclosure on the collateral underlying defaulted loans. We initially record OREO at fair value less estimated selling costs. Any excess of loan carrying value over the fair value of the real estate acquired is recorded as charge against the allowance for loan losses. Estimated losses that result from the ongoing periodic valuation of these properties are charged to earnings in the period in which they are identified. The fair values of OREO properties are estimated using appraisals and management estimates of current market conditions. OREO properties are appraised every 18-24 months unless deterioration in local market conditions indicates the need to obtain new appraisals sooner. OREO properties are evaluated by management quarterly to determine if additional write-downs are appropriate or necessary based on current market conditions. Quarterly evaluations include a review of the most recent appraisal of the property and reviews of recent appraisals and comparable sales data for similar properties in the same or adjacent market areas. Commercial and agricultural OREO properties are listed with unrelated third party professional real estate agents or brokers local to the areas where the marketed properties are located. Residential properties are typically listed with local realtors, after any redemption period has expired. We rely on these local real estate agents and/or brokers to list the properties on the local multiple listing system, to provide marketing materials and advertisements for the properties and to conduct open houses.
OREO decreased $10 million, or 30.1%, to $23 million as of June 30, 2013, from $33 million as of December 31, 2012. During the first half of 2013, we recorded additions to OREO of $9 million, wrote down the fair value of OREO properties by $3 million and sold OREO with a book value of $16 million at a net gain of $2.7 million, compared to additions of $33 million, fair value write-downs of $1 million and sales of $16 million at a net loss of $6 thousand during the same period in 2012. As of June 30, 2013, OREO was comprised 54% of land and land development properties, 26% of commercial properties and 20% of residential properties.
Allowance for Loan Losses.
The Company performs a quarterly assessment of the adequacy of its allowance for loan losses in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The methodology used to assess the adequacy is consistently applied to the Company's loan portfolio. The allowance for loan losses is established through a provision for loan losses based on our evaluation of known and inherent risk in our loan portfolio at each balance sheet date. In determining the allowance for loan losses, we estimate losses on specific loans, or groups of loans, where the probable loss can be identified and reasonably determined. The balance of the allowance for loan losses is based on internally assigned risk classifications of loans, historical loan loss rates, changes in the nature of the loan portfolio, overall portfolio quality, industry concentrations, delinquency trends, current economic factors and the estimated impact of current economic conditions on certain historical loan loss rates. See the discussion under “Critical Accounting Estimates and Significant Accounting Policies — Allowance for Loan Losses” above.
The allowance for loan losses is increased by provisions charged against earnings and reduced by net loan charge-offs. Loans, or portions thereof, are charged-off when management believes that the collectibility of the principal is unlikely or, with respect to consumer installment and credit card loans, according to established delinquency schedules.
The allowance for loan losses consists of three elements:
(1)
Specific valuation allowances associated with impaired loans. Specific valuation allowances are determined based on assessment of the fair value of the collateral underlying the loans as determined through independent appraisals, the present value of future cash flows, observable market prices and any relevant qualitative or environmental factors impacting the loan. No specific valuation allowances are recorded for impaired loans that are adequately secured.
41
Table of Contents
(2)
Historical valuation allowances based on loan loss experience for similar loans with similar characteristics and trends. Historical valuation allowances are determined by applying percentage loss factors to the credit exposures from outstanding loans. For commercial, agricultural and real estate loans, loss factors are applied based on the internal risk classifications of these loans. For consumer loans, loss factors are applied on a portfolio basis. For commercial, agriculture and real estate loans, loss factor percentages are based on a migration analysis of our historical loss
experience, designed to account for credit deterioration. For consumer loans, loss factor percentages are based on a one-year loss history.
(3) General valuation allowances determined based on changes in the nature of the loan portfolio, overall portfolio quality, industry concentrations, delinquency trends, general economic conditions and other qualitative risk factors both internal and external to us.
Based on the assessment of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, management records provisions for loan losses to maintain the allowance for loan losses at appropriate levels.
Loans, or portions thereof, are charged-off against the allowance for loan losses when management believes that the collectability of the principal is unlikely, or, with respect to consumer installment loans, according to an established delinquency schedule. Generally, loans are charged-off when (1) there has been no material principal reduction within the previous 90 days and there is no pending sale of collateral or other assets, (2) there is no significant or pending event which will result in principal reduction within the upcoming 90 days, (3) it is clear that we will not be able to collect all or a portion of the loan, (4) payments on the loan are sporadic, will result in an excessive amortization or are not consistent with the collateral held and (5) foreclosure or repossession actions are pending. Loan charge-offs do not directly correspond with the receipt of independent appraisals or the use of observable market data if the collateral value is determined to be sufficient to repay the principal balance of the loan.
If the impaired loan is adequately collateralized, a specific valuation allowance is not recorded. As such, significant changes in impaired and non-performing loans do not necessarily correspond proportionally with changes in the specific valuation component of the allowance for loan losses. Additionally, management expects the timing of charge-offs will vary between quarters and will not necessarily correspond proportionally to changes in the allowance for loan losses or changes in non-performing or impaired loans due to timing differences among the initial identification of an impaired loan, recording of a specific valuation allowance for the impaired loan and any resulting charge-off of uncollectible principal.
42
Table of Contents
The following table sets forth information regarding our allowance for loan losses as of and for the periods indicated.
Allowance for Loan Losses
(Dollars in thousands)
Three Months Ended
June 30,
March 31,
December 31,
September 30,
June 30,
2013
2013
2012
2012
2012
Balance at beginning of period
$
97,904
$
100,511
$
99,006
$
102,794
$
115,902
Provision charged to operating expense
375
500
8,000
9,500
12,000
Charge offs:
Real estate
Commercial
1,251
1,098
2,914
3,058
6,362
Construction
449
1,723
3,355
4,477
15,107
Residential
324
1,226
590
1,603
861
Agricultural
3
96
2
1
20
Consumer
1,299
1,062
1,458
1,340
1,210
Commercial
569
811
1,963
4,334
3,180
Agricultural
—
4
9
—
5
Total charge-offs
3,895
6,020
10,291
14,813
26,745
Recoveries:
Real estate
Commercial
2,140
714
318
24
483
Construction
593
325
1,443
260
13
Residential
134
22
59
102
30
Agricultural
6
1
—
2
—
Consumer
672
473
471
465
488
Commercial
596
1,375
1,504
665
609
Agricultural
3
3
1
7
14
Total recoveries
4,144
2,913
3,796
1,525
1,637
Net charge-offs
(249
)
3,107
6,495
13,288
25,108
Balance at end of period
$
98,528
$
97,904
$
100,511
$
99,006
$
102,794
Period end loans
$
4,297,364
$
4,224,559
$
4,223,912
$
4,180,051
$
4,169,963
Average loans
4,256,579
4,216,934
4,197,665
4,183,016
4,159,565
Net loans charged-off to average loans, annualized
(0.02
)%
0.30
%
0.62
%
1.26
%
2.43
%
Allowance to period end loans
2.29
%
2.32
%
2.38
%
2.37
%
2.47
%
Although we believe that we have established our allowance for loan losses in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and that the allowance for loan losses was adequate to provide for known and inherent losses in the portfolio at all times, future provisions will be subject to on-going evaluations of the risks in the loan portfolio. If the economy declines or asset quality deteriorates, material additional provisions could be required.
Investment Securities.
We manage our investment portfolio to obtain the highest yield possible, while meeting our risk tolerance and liquidity guidelines and satisfying the pledging requirements for deposits of state and political subdivisions and securities sold under repurchase agreements. Investment securities decreased $65 million, or 2.9%, to $2,139 million, or 29.3% of total assets, as of June 30, 2013, from $2,203 million, or 28.5% of total assets, as of December 31, 2012. Rising interest rates caused the estimated duration of our investment portfolio to extend to 3.6 years as of June 30, 2013, from to 2.5 years as of December 31, 2012.
We evaluate our investment portfolio quarterly for other-than-temporary declines in the market value of individual investment securities. This evaluation includes monitoring credit ratings; market, industry and corporate news; volatility in market prices; and, determining whether the market value of a security has been below its cost for an extended period of time. As of June 30, 2013, we had investment securities with fair values of $616 thousand that had been in a continuous loss position more than twelve months. Gross unrealized losses on these securities totaled $30 thousand as of June 30, 2013, and were attributable to changes in interest rates. No impairment losses were recorded during the three or six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.
43
Table of Contents
Cash and Cash Equivalents.
Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, amounts due from banks, federal funds sold for one day periods and interest bearing deposits in banks with original maturities of less than three months. Cash and cash equivalents decreased $433 million, or 54.0%, to $368 million as of June 30, 2013, from $801 million as of December 31, 2012. Fluctuations in cash and cash equivalents occurred during the normal course of business.
Deferred Tax Asset.
Our net deferred tax asset increased $13 million, or 492.9%, to $15 million as of June 30, 2013, from $3 million as of December 31, 2012, primarily due to increases in deferred tax assets related to net unrealized losses on available-for-sale investment securities.
Deposits.
Our deposits consist of non-interest bearing and interest bearing demand, savings, individual retirement and time deposit accounts. Total deposits decreased $98 million, or 1.6%, to $5,930 million as of June 30, 2013, from $6,028 million as of March 31, 2013 and $310 million, or 5.0%, from $6,240 million December 31, 2012, with a slight shift in the mix of deposits away from demand and time deposits to savings deposits. Total deposits were at a historically high level as of December 31, 2012 and returned to more normalized levels during first quarter 2013.
The following table summarizes our deposits as of the dates indicated:
Deposits
(Dollars in thousands)
June 30,
2013
Percent
of Total
December 31,
2012
Percent
of Total
Non-interest bearing demand
$
1,393,732
23.5
%
$
1,495,309
24.0
%
Interest bearing:
Demand
1,701,057
28.7
1,811,905
29.0
Savings
1,547,915
26.1
1,547,713
24.8
Time, $100 and over
535,337
9.0
594,712
9.5
Time, other (1)
752,291
12.7
790,772
12.7
Total interest bearing
4,536,600
76.5
4,745,102
76.0
Total deposits
$
5,930,332
100.0
%
$
6,240,411
100.0
%
(1)
Included in Time, other are Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service, or CDAR, deposits of $66 million as of June 30, 2013 and $72 million as of December 31, 2012.
Repurchase Agreements.
In addition to deposits, repurchase agreements with commercial depositors, which include municipalities, provide an additional source of funds. Under repurchase agreements, deposits balances are invested in short-term U.S. government agency securities overnight and are then repurchased the following day. All outstanding repurchase agreements are due in one day. Repurchase agreements decreased $84 million, or 16.7%, to $421 million as of June 30, 2013, from $506 million as of December 31, 2012, due to fluctuations in the liquidity of our customers.
Preferred Stock Redemption.
On January 18, 2013, we redeemed $50 million of outstanding 6.75% Series A noncumulative redeemable preferred stock, or preferred stock. The aggregate redemption price was $50 million, which represented par value plus unpaid and accrued dividends to the date of redemption. The preferred stock was reclassified from stockholders' equity to a liability upon notice of the redemption to preferred stockholders in December 2012.
Capital Resources and Liquidity Management
Stockholders’ equity is influenced primarily by earnings, dividends, changes in the unrealized holding gains or losses, net of taxes, on available-for-sale investment securities and sales and redemptions of common stock. Stockholders’ equity increased $19 million, or 2.5%, to $770 million as of June 30, 2013, from $751 million as of December 31, 2012, primarily due to the retention of earnings. This increase was partially offset by a shift in net unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale investment securities, net of tax, from a net gain of $18 million as of December 31, 2012, to a net loss of $8 million as of June 30, 2013.
During the six months ended June 30, 2013, we paid aggregate cash dividends of $5.6 million, or $0.13 per share, to common stockholders, as compared to aggregate cash dividends of $10.3 million, or $0.24 per share, to common shareholders during the same period in 2012. During fourth quarter 2012, we declared and paid an accelerated aggregate quarterly cash dividend of $5.6 million, or $0.13 per share, to common shareholders. This accelerated dividend, paid on December 17, 2012, was in lieu of the quarterly dividend which would have been declared and paid in January 2013. On July 25, 2013, we declared a quarterly dividend to common stockholders of $0.14 per share to be paid on August 15, 2013 to shareholders of record as of August 5, 2013.
44
Table of Contents
Pursuant to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act, the Federal Reserve and FDIC have adopted regulations setting forth a five-tier system for measuring the capital adequacy of the financial institutions they supervise. As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Bank had capital levels that, in all cases, exceeded the well-capitalized guidelines. As of June 30, 2013, we had consolidated leverage, tier 1 and total risk-based capital ratios of 9.73%, 14.45% and 16.29%, respectively, as compared to 8.81%, 13.60% and 15.59%, respectively, as of December 31, 2012. For additional information regarding our capital levels, see “Note 8 – Regulatory Capital” in the accompanying “Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements” included in this report.
On May 24, 2013, we filed a universal shelf registration statement with the SEC. The registration statement permits us to offer and sell up to $160 million of our Class A common shares in one or more future public offerings. At the present time, we have no specific use for proceeds or plans to offer any of the securities covered by the registration statement. For additional information regarding the registration statement, see "Recent Trends and Developments – Universal Shelf Registration Statement" included herein.
On July 2, 2013, the Board issued a final rule implementing a revised regulatory capital framework for U.S. banks in accordance with the Basel III international accord and satisfying related mandates under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. For additional information regarding the impact of this final rule, see "Recent Trends and Developments – Basel III Regulatory Capital Rule Revision" included herein.
Liquidity.
Liquidity measures our ability to meet current and future cash flow needs on a timely basis and at a reasonable cost. We manage our liquidity position to meet the daily cash flow needs of customers, while maintaining an appropriate balance between assets and liabilities to meet the return on investment objectives of our shareholders. Our liquidity position is supported by management of liquid assets and liabilities and access to alternative sources of funds. Liquid assets include cash, interest bearing deposits in banks, federal funds sold, available-for-sale investment securities and maturing or prepaying balances in our held-to-maturity investment and loan portfolios. Liquid liabilities include core deposits, federal funds purchased, securities sold under repurchase agreements and borrowings. Other sources of liquidity include the sale of loans, the ability to acquire additional national market, non-core deposits, the issuance of additional collateralized borrowings such as FHLB advances, the issuance of debt securities, additional borrowings through the Federal Reserve’s discount window and the issuance of preferred or common securities.
Our short-term and long-term liquidity requirements are primarily to fund on-going operations, including payment of interest on deposits and debt, extensions of credit to borrowers, capital expenditures and shareholder dividends. These liquidity requirements are met primarily through cash flow from operations, redeployment of prepaying and maturing balances in our loan and investment portfolios, debt financing and increases in customer deposits. For additional information regarding our operating, investing and financing cash flows, see the unaudited “Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows,” included in Part I, Item 1.
As a holding company, we are a corporation separate and apart from the Bank and, therefore, we provide for our own liquidity. Our main sources of funding include management fees and dividends declared and paid by the Bank and access to capital markets. There are statutory, regulatory and debt covenant limitations that affect the ability of our subsidiary bank to pay dividends to us. Management believes that such limitations will not impact our ability to meet our ongoing short-term cash obligations.
Management continuously monitors our liquidity position and adjustments are made to the balance between sources and uses of funds as deemed appropriate. Our management is not aware of any events that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our liquidity, capital resources or operations. In addition, our management is not aware of any regulatory recommendations regarding liquidity, which if implemented, would have a material adverse effect on us.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See “Note 14 – Recent Authoritative Accounting Guidance” in the accompanying “Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements” included in this report for details of recently issued accounting pronouncements and their expected impact on our financial statements.
45
Table of Contents
Item 3.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES
ABOUT MARKET RISK
As of June 30, 2013, there have been no material changes in the quantitative and qualitative information about market risk provided pursuant to Item 305 of Regulation S-K as presented in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.
Item 4.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective disclosure controls and procedures, as defined under Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act. As of June 30, 2013, an evaluation was performed, under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2013, were effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods required by the SEC’s rules and forms, and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting for the quarter ended June 30, 2013, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, such control.
Limitations on Controls and Procedures
The effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and our internal control over financial reporting is subject to various inherent limitations, including cost limitations, judgments used in decision making, assumptions about the likelihood of future events, the soundness of our systems, the possibility of human error, and the risk of fraud. Moreover, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions and the risk that the degree of compliance with policies or procedures may deteriorate over time. Because of these limitations, any system of disclosure controls and procedures or internal control over financial reporting may not be successful in preventing all errors or fraud or in making all material information known in a timely manner to the appropriate levels of management.
PART II.
OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.
Legal Proceedings
There have been no material changes in legal proceedings as described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
There have been no material changes in risk factors described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.
Item 2.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
(a) There were no unregistered sales of equity securities during the three months ended June 30, 2013.
(b) Not applicable.
46
Table of Contents
(c) No purchases were made by or on behalf of us or any “affiliated purchasers” (as defined in Rule 10b-18(a)(3) under the Exchange Act), of our common stock during the three months ended June 30, 2013.
Item 3.
Defaults upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4.
Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
Item 5.
Other Information
Not applicable or required.
Item 6. Exhibits
3.1
Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation dated March 5, 2010 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed on March 10, 2010)
3.2
Second Amended and Restated Bylaws dated January 27, 2011 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed on February 3, 2011)
4.1
Specimen of Series A preferred stock certificate of First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007)
10.1
Credit Agreement Re: Subordinated Term Note dated as of January 10, 2008, between First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. and First Midwest Bank (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.24 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 16, 2008)
10.2
Lease Agreement between Billings 401 Joint Venture and First Interstate Bank Montana dated September 20, 1985 and addendum thereto (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Company’s Post-Effective Amendment No. 3 to Registration Statement on Form S-1, No. 033-84540, filed on September 29, 1994)
10.3†
First Interstate BancSystem’s Deferred Compensation Plan dated December 1, 2006 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.9 of the Company’s Pre-Effective Amendment No. 3 to Registration Statement on Form S-1, No. 333-164380, filed on March 23, 2010)
10.4†
First Amendment to the First Interstate BancSystem’s Deferred Compensation Plan dated October 24, 2008 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.10 of the Company’s Pre-Effective Amendment No. 3 to Registration Statement on Form S-1, No. 333-164380, filed on March 23, 2010)
10.5†
2001 Stock Option Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.12 of the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8, No. 333-106495, filed on June 25, 2003)
10.6†
Second Amendment to 2001 Stock Option Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010)
10.7†
First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. 2006 Equity Compensation Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Appendix A of the Company’s 2006 Definitive Proxy Statement of Schedule 14A)
10.8†
Amendment to First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. 2006 Equity Compensation Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on
March 22, 2010)
10.9†
Second Amendment to First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. 2006 Equity Compensation Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.9 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010)
10.10†
Third Amendment to the First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. 2006 Equity Compensation Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.10 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 1, 2013)
10.11*†
Fourth Amendment to the First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. 2006 Equity Compensation Plan
10.12†
Form of First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. 2006 Equity Compensation Plan Restricted Stock Agreement (Time) for Certain Executive Officers, (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.13 of the Company's Annual Report on form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008)
47
Table of Contents
10.13†
Form of First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. 2006 Equity Compensation Plan Restricted Stock Agreement (Performance) for Certain Executive Officers, (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Current Report on form 8-K filed on February 13, 2013)
10.14
Trademark License Agreements between Wells Fargo & Company and First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.11 of the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, No. 333-25633 filed on April 22, 1997)
31.1*
Certification of Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by Chief Executive Officer
31.2*
Certification of Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by Chief Financial Officer
32*
Certification of Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101**
Interactive data file
†
Management contract or compensatory arrangement.
*
Filed herewith.
**
As provided in Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, this information is furnished and not filed for purposes of Sections 11 and 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
48
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
FIRST INTERSTATE BANCSYSTEM, INC.
Date: July 31, 2013
/
S
/ ED GARDING
Ed Garding
President and Chief Executive Officer
Date: July 31, 2013
/
S
/ TERRILL R. MOORE
Terrill R. Moore
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
49