Companies:
10,793
total market cap:
C$192.867 T
Sign In
๐บ๐ธ
EN
English
$ CAD
$
USD
๐บ๐ธ
โฌ
EUR
๐ช๐บ
โน
INR
๐ฎ๐ณ
ยฃ
GBP
๐ฌ๐ง
$
AUD
๐ฆ๐บ
$
NZD
๐ณ๐ฟ
$
HKD
๐ญ๐ฐ
$
SGD
๐ธ๐ฌ
Global ranking
Ranking by countries
America
๐บ๐ธ United States
๐จ๐ฆ Canada
๐ฒ๐ฝ Mexico
๐ง๐ท Brazil
๐จ๐ฑ Chile
Europe
๐ช๐บ European Union
๐ฉ๐ช Germany
๐ฌ๐ง United Kingdom
๐ซ๐ท France
๐ช๐ธ Spain
๐ณ๐ฑ Netherlands
๐ธ๐ช Sweden
๐ฎ๐น Italy
๐จ๐ญ Switzerland
๐ต๐ฑ Poland
๐ซ๐ฎ Finland
Asia
๐จ๐ณ China
๐ฏ๐ต Japan
๐ฐ๐ท South Korea
๐ญ๐ฐ Hong Kong
๐ธ๐ฌ Singapore
๐ฎ๐ฉ Indonesia
๐ฎ๐ณ India
๐ฒ๐พ Malaysia
๐น๐ผ Taiwan
๐น๐ญ Thailand
๐ป๐ณ Vietnam
Others
๐ฆ๐บ Australia
๐ณ๐ฟ New Zealand
๐ฎ๐ฑ Israel
๐ธ๐ฆ Saudi Arabia
๐น๐ท Turkey
๐ท๐บ Russia
๐ฟ๐ฆ South Africa
>> All Countries
Ranking by categories
๐ All assets by Market Cap
๐ Automakers
โ๏ธ Airlines
๐ซ Airports
โ๏ธ Aircraft manufacturers
๐ฆ Banks
๐จ Hotels
๐ Pharmaceuticals
๐ E-Commerce
โ๏ธ Healthcare
๐ฆ Courier services
๐ฐ Media/Press
๐ท Alcoholic beverages
๐ฅค Beverages
๐ Clothing
โ๏ธ Mining
๐ Railways
๐ฆ Insurance
๐ Real estate
โ Ports
๐ผ Professional services
๐ด Food
๐ Restaurant chains
โ๐ป Software
๐ Semiconductors
๐ฌ Tobacco
๐ณ Financial services
๐ข Oil&Gas
๐ Electricity
๐งช Chemicals
๐ฐ Investment
๐ก Telecommunication
๐๏ธ Retail
๐ฅ๏ธ Internet
๐ Construction
๐ฎ Video Game
๐ป Tech
๐ฆพ AI
>> All Categories
ETFs
๐ All ETFs
๐๏ธ Bond ETFs
๏ผ Dividend ETFs
โฟ Bitcoin ETFs
โข Ethereum ETFs
๐ช Crypto Currency ETFs
๐ฅ Gold ETFs & ETCs
๐ฅ Silver ETFs & ETCs
๐ข๏ธ Oil ETFs & ETCs
๐ฝ Commodities ETFs & ETNs
๐ Emerging Markets ETFs
๐ Small-Cap ETFs
๐ Low volatility ETFs
๐ Inverse/Bear ETFs
โฌ๏ธ Leveraged ETFs
๐ Global/World ETFs
๐บ๐ธ USA ETFs
๐บ๐ธ S&P 500 ETFs
๐บ๐ธ Dow Jones ETFs
๐ช๐บ Europe ETFs
๐จ๐ณ China ETFs
๐ฏ๐ต Japan ETFs
๐ฎ๐ณ India ETFs
๐ฌ๐ง UK ETFs
๐ฉ๐ช Germany ETFs
๐ซ๐ท France ETFs
โ๏ธ Mining ETFs
โ๏ธ Gold Mining ETFs
โ๏ธ Silver Mining ETFs
๐งฌ Biotech ETFs
๐ฉโ๐ป Tech ETFs
๐ Real Estate ETFs
โ๏ธ Healthcare ETFs
โก Energy ETFs
๐ Renewable Energy ETFs
๐ก๏ธ Insurance ETFs
๐ฐ Water ETFs
๐ด Food & Beverage ETFs
๐ฑ Socially Responsible ETFs
๐ฃ๏ธ Infrastructure ETFs
๐ก Innovation ETFs
๐ Semiconductors ETFs
๐ Aerospace & Defense ETFs
๐ Cybersecurity ETFs
๐ฆพ Artificial Intelligence ETFs
Watchlist
Account
PotlatchDeltic
PCH
#3914
Rank
C$4.47 B
Marketcap
๐บ๐ธ
United States
Country
C$57.75
Share price
0.00%
Change (1 day)
7.16%
Change (1 year)
๐ Real estate
๐ฐ Investment
๐๏ธ REITs
Categories
Market cap
Revenue
Earnings
Price history
P/E ratio
P/S ratio
More
Price history
P/E ratio
P/S ratio
P/B ratio
Operating margin
EPS
Stock Splits
Dividends
Dividend yield
Shares outstanding
Fails to deliver
Cost to borrow
Total assets
Total liabilities
Total debt
Cash on Hand
Net Assets
Annual Reports (10-K)
PotlatchDeltic
Quarterly Reports (10-Q)
Submitted on 2012-10-23
PotlatchDeltic - 10-Q quarterly report FY
Text size:
Small
Medium
Large
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
_____________________________________________________________
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)
x
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2012
Or
¨
Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 1-32729
_____________________________________________________________
POTLATCH CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
82-0156045
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
601 West First Avenue, Suite 1600
Spokane, Washington
99201
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
(509) 835-1500
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
_____________________________________________________________
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
x
No
¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
x
No
¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
x
Accelerated filer
o
Non-accelerated filer
o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes
¨
No
x
The number of shares of common stock of the registrant outstanding as of
October 12, 2012
was
40,373,461
.
POTLATCH CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
Index to Form 10-Q
Page Number
PART I.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1.
Financial Statements
Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011
2
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011
3
Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011
4
Consolidated Condensed Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011
5
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
6
ITEM 2.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
14
ITEM 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
22
ITEM 4.
Controls and Procedures
22
PART II.
OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1.
Legal Proceedings
23
ITEM 1A.
Risk Factors
23
ITEM 6.
Exhibits
23
SIGNATURES
24
EXHIBIT INDEX
25
Part I
ITEM 1.
Financial Statements
Potlatch Corporation and Consolidated Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Income
Unaudited (Dollars in thousands, except per-share amounts)
Quarter Ended
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
September 30,
2012
2011
2012
2011
Revenues
$
151,911
$
152,891
$
381,835
$
387,494
Costs and expenses:
Cost of goods sold
109,806
108,420
287,469
287,473
Selling, general and administrative expenses
13,342
7,837
35,994
28,469
Asset impairment charge
—
1,180
—
1,180
123,148
117,437
323,463
317,122
Operating income
28,763
35,454
58,372
70,372
Interest expense, net
(6,280
)
(6,632
)
(19,043
)
(21,123
)
Income before income taxes
22,483
28,822
39,329
49,249
Income tax provision
(3,884
)
(3,223
)
(10,599
)
(7,505
)
Net income
$
18,599
$
25,599
$
28,730
$
41,744
Net income per share:
Basic
$
0.46
$
0.64
$
0.71
$
1.04
Diluted
0.46
0.63
0.71
1.03
Distributions per share
$
0.31
$
0.51
$
0.93
$
1.53
Weighted-average shares outstanding (in thousands):
Basic
40,357
40,187
40,317
40,147
Diluted
40,571
40,380
40,503
40,360
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
2
Potlatch Corporation and Consolidated Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
Unaudited (Dollars in thousands)
Quarter Ended
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
September 30,
2012
2011
2012
2011
Net income
$
18,599
$
25,599
$
28,730
$
41,744
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
Defined benefit pension plans and other postretirement employee benefits:
Amortization of prior service credit included in net periodic cost, net of tax of $(836), $(765), $(2,548) and $(2,297)
(1,308
)
(1,198
)
(3,986
)
(3,592
)
Amortization of actuarial loss included in net periodic cost, net of tax of $1,801, $1,354, $5,405 and $4,061
2,819
2,117
8,457
6,351
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
1,511
919
4,471
2,759
Comprehensive income
$
20,110
$
26,518
$
33,201
$
44,503
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
3
Potlatch Corporation and Consolidated Subsidiaries
Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets
Unaudited (Dollars in thousands, except per-share amounts)
September 30,
2012
December 31,
2011
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash
$
9,033
$
7,819
Short-term investments
53,429
62,989
Receivables, net
24,532
13,533
Inventories
29,431
28,603
Deferred tax assets
11,909
11,909
Other assets
10,435
9,998
Total current assets
138,769
134,851
Property, plant and equipment, net
58,093
61,453
Timber and timberlands, net
455,415
459,687
Deferred tax assets
44,541
57,924
Other assets
11,898
32,305
$
708,716
$
746,220
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Current installments on long-term debt
$
8,413
$
21,661
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
67,046
55,948
Total current liabilities
75,459
77,609
Long-term debt
337,308
344,742
Liability for pensions and other postretirement employee benefits
135,854
163,116
Other long-term obligations
20,210
18,615
Stockholders’ equity
139,885
142,138
$
708,716
$
746,220
Shares outstanding (in thousands)
40,369
40,202
Stockholders’ equity per share
$
3.47
$
3.54
Working capital
$
63,310
$
57,242
Current ratio
1.8
1.7
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
4
Potlatch Corporation and Consolidated Subsidiaries
Consolidated Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
Unaudited (Dollars in thousands)
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
2012
2011
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income
$
28,730
$
41,744
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
19,271
22,916
Basis of real estate sold
1,623
10,053
Change in deferred taxes
10,539
7,506
Gain on disposition of property, plant and equipment
(1
)
(106
)
Employee benefit plans
3,001
(1,589
)
Equity-based compensation expense
3,057
3,144
Asset impairment
—
1,180
Proceeds from sales deposited with a like-kind exchange intermediary
(526
)
—
Funding of qualified pension plans
(21,630
)
(9,400
)
Working capital changes
(1,031
)
(3,342
)
Net cash provided by operating activities
43,033
72,106
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Decrease in short-term investments
9,560
10,559
Proceeds from company owned life insurance (COLI) loan
21,751
—
Additions to property, plant and equipment
(3,502
)
(4,163
)
Additions to timber and timberlands
(8,367
)
(7,915
)
Proceeds from disposition of property, plant and equipment
35
185
Other, net
(1,252
)
(1,564
)
Net cash provided by (used for) investing activities
18,225
(2,898
)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Distributions to common stockholders
(37,520
)
(61,458
)
Payments on long-term debt
(21,662
)
(5,011
)
Issuance of common stock
709
1,230
Change in book overdrafts
(29
)
(1,377
)
Deferred financing costs
(30
)
(343
)
Employee tax withholdings on equity-based compensation
(1,714
)
(1,610
)
Other, net
202
(15
)
Net cash used for financing activities
(60,044
)
(68,584
)
Increase in cash
1,214
624
Cash at beginning of period
7,819
5,593
Cash at end of period
$
9,033
$
6,217
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Cash paid (received) during the period for:
Interest, net of amount capitalized
$
13,171
$
13,974
Income taxes, net
(38
)
(5,977
)
Non-cash investing activity:
Additions to timber and timberlands
60
341
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
5
Potlatch Corporation and Consolidated Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Unaudited (Dollars in thousands)
NOTE 1.
Basis of Presentation
For purposes of this report, any reference to “Potlatch,” “the company,” “we,” “us,” and “our” means Potlatch Corporation and all of its wholly owned subsidiaries, except where the context indicates otherwise.
The accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income for the quarters and
nine
months ended
September 30, 2012
and
2011
, the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the quarters and
nine
months ended
September 30, 2012
and
2011
, the Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets at
September 30, 2012
and
December 31, 2011
and the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Cash Flows for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2012
and
2011
have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. We believe that all adjustments necessary for a fair statement of the results of such interim periods have been included.
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2011
, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
February 17, 2012
.
NOTE 2.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued Accounting Standard Update, or ASU, 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income, to increase the prominence of other comprehensive income in the financial statements. An entity has the option to present the components of net income and comprehensive income in either one or two consecutive financial statements. The new guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2011. We adopted this guidance and presented the components of net income and comprehensive income in two consecutive statements. The adoption of ASU 2011-05 did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
NOTE 3.
Income Taxes
As a real estate investment trust, or REIT, if we meet certain requirements we generally are not subject to federal and state corporate income taxes on our income from investments in real estate that we distribute to our shareholders. We are, however, subject to corporate taxes on income earned by our taxable REIT subsidiaries, or Potlatch TRS, and on built-in gains (the excess of fair market value at January 1, 2006 over tax basis on that date) with respect to the REIT's sale of any real property owned at such date within the first ten years following our conversion to a REIT, except for sales that occurred in 2011. The Small Business Jobs Act of 2010 modified the built-in gains provisions to exempt sales of real properties by a REIT in 2011, if five years of the recognition period had elapsed before January 1, 2011. The built-in gains tax is eliminated or deferred if sale proceeds are reinvested in like-kind property in accordance with the like-kind exchange provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. The built-in gains tax is not applicable to the sale of timber pursuant to a stumpage sale agreement or timber deed.
For the quarters ended
September 30, 2012
and
2011
, we recorded income tax provisions related to Potlatch TRS of
$3.9 million
and
$3.2 million
, respectively, due to pre-tax income. For the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2012
and
2011
, we recorded income tax provisions related to Potlatch TRS of
$10.5 million
and
$7.5 million
, respectively, due to pre-tax income. For the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2012
, we recorded income tax expense of
$0.1 million
related to the sale of REIT properties.
We reviewed our tax positions at
September 30, 2012
and determined that
no
uncertain tax positions were taken during the first
nine
months of
2012
, and that no new information was available that would require derecognition of previously taken positions.
We reflect accrued interest related to tax obligations, as well as penalties, in our provision for income taxes. During the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2012
and
2011
, amounts for interest and penalties included in our tax provision were insignificant. At
September 30, 2012
and
December 31, 2011
, we had
no
accrued interest or penalties related to income taxes.
6
NOTE 4.
Earnings per Share
The following table reconciles the number of shares used in calculating the basic and diluted earnings per share for the quarters and
nine
months ended
September 30
:
Quarter Ended
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
September 30,
(Dollars in thousands, except per-share amounts)
2012
2011
2012
2011
Net income
$
18,599
$
25,599
$
28,730
$
41,744
Basic weighted-average shares outstanding
40,356,512
40,187,334
40,316,957
40,147,133
Incremental shares due to:
Stock options
27,558
44,147
20,263
54,048
Performance shares
119,400
120,182
102,000
129,691
Restricted stock units
67,598
28,639
63,938
29,005
Diluted weighted-average shares outstanding
40,571,068
40,380,302
40,503,158
40,359,877
Basic net income per share
$
0.46
$
0.64
$
0.71
$
1.04
Diluted net income per share
$
0.46
$
0.63
$
0.71
$
1.03
Anti-dilutive shares excluded from the calculation:
Performance shares
—
77,767
—
77,767
Restricted stock units
—
—
1,000
2,700
Total anti-dilutive shares excluded from the calculation
—
77,767
1,000
80,467
NOTE 5.
Equity-Based Compensation
As of
September 30, 2012
, we had three stock incentive plans under which stock option, performance share or restricted stock unit, or RSU, grants were outstanding, with approximately
367,000
shares authorized for future use under the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan.
The following table details our compensation expense for the quarters and
nine
months ended
September 30
:
Quarter Ended
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
September 30,
(Dollars in thousands)
2012
2011
2012
2011
Employee equity-based compensation expense:
Performance shares
$
891
$
942
$
2,598
$
2,707
Restricted stock units
168
155
459
437
Total employee equity-based compensation expense
$
1,059
$
1,097
$
3,057
$
3,144
Related net income tax benefit
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
Director deferred compensation expense (income)
$
1,126
$
(373
)
$
1,553
$
484
There were
no
realized tax benefits related to the excess of the deductible amount over the compensation cost recognized in the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Cash Flows during any of the periods presented above.
7
STOCK OPTIONS
The following table summarizes outstanding stock options as of
September 30, 2012
and changes during the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2012
:
(Dollars in thousands, except exercise prices)
Shares
Weighted Avg.
Exercise Price
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at January 1
144,684
$
23.34
Shares exercised
(40,830
)
16.63
$
679
Shares canceled or expired
—
—
Outstanding and exercisable at September 30
103,854
25.68
1,214
There were
no
unvested stock options outstanding during the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2012
. The aggregate intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2011
was
$1.3 million
.
The following table summarizes outstanding stock options as of
September 30, 2012
:
Options Outstanding and Exercisable
Range of Exercise Prices
Outstanding
Weighted Avg.
Remaining
Contractual Life
Weighted Avg.
Exercise Price
$14.4398
11,545
0.17 years
$
14.44
$19.2569
30,340
1.17 years
19.26
$30.9204
61,969
2.17 years
30.92
$14.4398 to $30.9204
103,854
1.66 years
25.68
Cash received from stock option exercises for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2012
and
2011
was
$0.7 million
and
$1.2 million
, respectively.
No
actual tax benefits were realized for tax deductions from options exercised during either period.
PERFORMANCE SHARES
The following table presents the key inputs used in the Monte Carlo simulation method to calculate the fair value of the performance share awards in
2012
and
2011
, and the resulting fair values:
2012
2011
Shares granted
85,028
77,767
Stock price as of valuation date
$
31.11
$
39.10
Risk-free rate
0.40
%
1.26
%
Fair value of a performance share
$
34.24
$
55.84
The following table summarizes outstanding performance share awards as of
September 30, 2012
, and changes during the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2012
:
(Dollars in thousands, except grant date fair value)
Shares
Weighted Avg.
Grant Date
Fair Value
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
Unvested shares outstanding at January 1
154,594
$
50.54
Granted
85,028
34.24
Forfeited
(2,596
)
44.99
Unvested shares outstanding at September 30
237,026
44.76
$
8,657
As of
September 30, 2012
, there was
$4.2 million
of unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested performance share awards, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of
1.25
years.
8
RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS
The following table summarizes outstanding RSU awards as of
September 30, 2012
, and changes during the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2012
:
(Dollars in thousands, except grant date fair value)
Shares
Weighted Avg.
Grant Date
Fair Value
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
Unvested shares outstanding at January 1
36,359
$
35.60
Granted
19,725
31.38
Vested
(1,290
)
33.27
Forfeited
(1,504
)
33.36
Unvested shares outstanding at September 30
53,290
34.16
$
1,991
For RSU awards granted during the period, the fair value of each share was determined on the date of grant using the grant date market price. The total fair value of RSU awards vested during the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2012
was less than
$0.1 million
. As of
September 30, 2012
, there was
$0.8 million
of unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested RSU awards, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of
1.3
years.
NOTE 6.
Detail of Certain Balance Sheet Accounts
The following tables detail certain accounts as of the balance sheet dates:
(Dollars in thousands)
September 30, 2012
December 31, 2011
Inventories:
Lumber and other manufactured wood products
$
13,168
$
12,002
Logs
11,703
12,400
Materials and supplies
4,560
4,201
$
29,431
$
28,603
Current Other Assets:
Basis of real estate held for sale
$
7,433
$
7,433
Prepaid expenses
1,567
1,128
Deferred charges
1,435
1,437
$
10,435
$
9,998
Noncurrent Other Assets:
Developed land costs
$
3,626
$
3,635
Derivative asset associated with interest rate swap
3,170
2,409
Deferred charges
2,973
4,129
Noncurrent investments
1,496
22,043
Restricted cash
526
—
Other
107
89
$
11,898
$
32,305
The decrease in Noncurrent Other Assets - Noncurrent investments as of
September 30, 2012
from
December 31, 2011
was due to borrowing against our company owned life insurance, or COLI, plan, based on the cash surrender value that had accumulated over the years, to make a pension contribution.
9
NOTE 7.
Pension Plans and Other Postretirement Employee Benefits
The following tables detail the components of net periodic cost (benefit) of our pension plans and other postretirement employee benefits, or OPEB, for the quarters and
nine
months ended
September 30
:
Quarters ended
September 30
:
Pension Plans
Other Postretirement
Employee Benefits
(Dollars in thousands)
2012
2011
2012
2011
Service cost
$
1,309
$
1,114
$
71
$
112
Interest cost
4,997
5,331
620
871
Expected return on plan assets
(7,188
)
(7,951
)
—
—
Amortization of prior service cost (credit)
192
171
(2,336
)
(2,134
)
Amortization of actuarial loss
3,839
2,479
781
992
Net periodic cost (benefit)
$
3,149
$
1,144
$
(864
)
$
(159
)
Nine months ended September 30:
Pension Plans
Other Postretirement
Employee Benefits
(Dollars in thousands)
2012
2011
2012
2011
Service cost
$
3,928
$
3,342
$
213
$
335
Interest cost
14,990
15,994
1,859
2,614
Expected return on plan assets
(21,566
)
(23,853
)
—
—
Amortization of prior service cost (credit)
577
513
(7,111
)
(6,402
)
Amortization of actuarial loss
11,517
7,437
2,345
2,975
Net periodic cost (benefit)
$
9,446
$
3,433
$
(2,694
)
$
(478
)
Our minimum funding requirement for 2012 was
$9.7 million
. During the first quarter of
2012
, we borrowed against our COLI plan, based on the cash surrender value that had accumulated over the years, to make a
$21.6 million
pension contribution. We contributed
$9.3 million
to our qualified salaried pension plan,
$6.8 million
to our qualified hourly pension plan and
$5.5 million
to our qualified non-represented pension plan, with
$11.9 million
being discretionary funding. We do not anticipate additional contributions to any of our qualified pension plans in
2012
. During the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2012
, we made contributions of
$1.3 million
to our non-qualified supplemental pension plan.
The following table details the components of "Other comprehensive income, net of tax" on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income of our pension plans and OPEB for the quarters and
nine
months ended
September 30
:
Quarter Ended
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
September 30,
(Dollars in thousands)
2012
2011
2012
2011
Other comprehensive income, net of tax, related to:
Defined benefit pension plans
$
2,459
$
1,616
$
7,377
$
4,849
OPEB obligations
(948
)
(697
)
(2,906
)
(2,090
)
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
$
1,511
$
919
$
4,471
$
2,759
10
NOTE 8.
Financial Instruments
The following table presents the estimated fair values of our financial instruments as of the balance sheet dates:
September 30, 2012
December 31, 2011
(Dollars in thousands)
Carrying
Amount
Fair
Value
Carrying
Amount
Fair
Value
Cash, restricted cash and short-term investments (Level 1)
$
62,988
$
62,988
$
70,808
$
70,808
Net derivative asset related to interest rate swaps (Level 2)
3,170
3,170
2,409
2,409
Derivative asset related to lumber swap (Level 2)
—
—
480
480
Long-term debt, including current installments on long-term debt (including fair value adjustments related to fair value hedges) (Level 2)
345,721
361,111
366,403
373,791
FAIR VALUE HEDGES OF INTEREST RATE RISK
As of
September 30, 2012
, we had
six
separate interest rate swap agreements with notional amounts totaling
$46.75 million
, associated with our
$22.5 million
debentures and
$24.25 million
of our medium-term notes. The swaps convert interest payments with fixed rates between
6.95%
and
8.89%
to variable rates of three-month LIBOR plus spreads between
4.738%
and
6.518%
. The interest rate swaps terminate at various dates between
December 2015
and
February 2018
.
No
net unrealized gain or loss was recognized in income for all periods presented because we recognized
no
hedge ineffectiveness.
NON-DESIGNATED LUMBER SWAP
In
February 2012
, we entered into two commodity swap contracts for a total of
22,500
mbf (thousand board feet) of southern yellow pine, which settled during the second quarter of 2012. In
September 2011
, we entered into a commodity swap contract for
31,200
mbf of southern yellow pine with an effective date of
November 1, 2011
and a termination date of
February 29, 2012
. In
October 2010
, we entered into a commodity swap contract for
14,300
mbf of southern yellow pine, which settled in the first quarter of 2011. Changes in the fair value of derivatives not designated in hedging relationships are recorded directly in net income. As of
September 30, 2012
there were no outstanding lumber swap contracts.
The following table presents the fair values of derivative instruments as of the balance sheet dates:
(Dollars in thousands)
Balance Sheet Location
September 30,
2012
December 31,
2011
Fair Value of Derivative Assets:
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
Interest rate contracts
Other assets (non-current)
$
3,170
$
2,409
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments
$
3,170
$
2,409
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Lumber contracts
Receivables, net
$
—
$
480
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
$
—
$
480
There were no derivatives recorded as liabilities as of
September 30, 2012
or
December 31, 2011
.
11
The following table details the effect of derivatives on the Consolidated Statements of Income for the quarters and
nine
months ended
September 30
:
Location of Gain (Loss)
Recognized in Income
Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income
Quarter Ended
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
September 30,
(Dollars in thousands)
2012
2011
2012
2011
Derivatives designated in fair value hedging relationships:
Interest rate contracts
Realized gain on hedging instrument
(1)
Interest expense
$
213
$
255
$
646
$
791
Net gain recognized in income from fair value hedges
$
213
$
255
$
646
$
791
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Lumber contracts
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivative
Cost of goods sold
$
—
$
1,650
$
(480
)
$
4,401
Realized gain (loss) on derivative
Cost of goods sold
—
304
(396
)
553
Net gain (loss) recognized in income from derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
$
—
$
1,954
$
(876
)
$
4,954
(1)
Realized gain on hedging instrument consists of net cash settlements and interest accruals on the interest rate swaps during the periods.
NOTE 9.
Commitments and Contingencies
In
January 2007
, the Environmental Protection Agency, or EPA, notified us that we are a potentially responsible party under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, or CERCLA, and the Clean Water Act for cleanup of a site known as Avery Landing in northern Idaho. We own a portion of the land at the Avery Landing site, which we acquired in 1980 from the Milwaukee Railroad. The land we own at the site and adjacent properties were contaminated with petroleum as a result of the Milwaukee Railroad’s operations at the site prior to 1980. We entered into a consent order with the EPA in
August 2008
to conduct an Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, or EE/CA, study to determine the best means of addressing the contamination at the site. In
January 2010
, we submitted our draft EE/CA report to the EPA outlining various alternatives for addressing the contamination at the entire site. Ultimately, the EPA published a draft EE/CA report on
January 26, 2011
for public comment. The EPA’s report focused on a limited number of remedial alternatives which range in cost from approximately
$7.9 million
to
$10.5 million
. The public comment period closed
March 11, 2011
. On
July 5, 2011
, the EPA issued an Action Memorandum for the Avery Landing Site selecting contaminant extraction and off-site disposal as the remedial alternative at an estimated cost of approximately
$9.5 million
. On
April 12, 2012
, the EPA issued a unilateral administrative order requiring us to remediate the portion of the Avery Landing site that we own. On May 23, 2012, we signed a consent order with the EPA pursuant to which the EPA agreed to suspend the unilateral administrative order and we agreed to provide
1.75 million
in funding for EPA cleanup on a portion of our property (including the adjacent riverbank owned by the Idaho Department of Lands). The EPA may lift the suspension of the unilateral order at any time; however, we expect the suspension to be in effect until the end of 2012. As of
September 30, 2012
, after payment of
$1.75 million
to the EPA, we have accrued
$4.25 million
for this matter based upon the estimated cost of remediating the remainder of our property. We have reserved all of our rights to seek reimbursement for the costs of remediation from all parties potentially responsible.
12
NOTE 10.
Segment Information
The following table summarizes information by business segmen
t for the quarters and
nine
months ended
September 30
:
Quarter Ended
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
September 30,
(Dollars in thousands)
2012
2011
2012
2011
Revenues:
Resource
$
82,144
$
86,770
$
156,486
$
172,587
Real Estate
2,353
14,809
19,181
46,808
Wood Products
86,732
69,239
244,279
204,343
171,229
170,818
419,946
423,738
Elimination of intersegment revenues - Resource
(19,318
)
(17,927
)
(38,111
)
(36,244
)
Total consolidated revenues
$
151,911
$
152,891
$
381,835
$
387,494
Operating income:
Resource
$
23,631
$
25,598
$
39,011
$
47,208
Real Estate
1,255
9,929
14,256
29,295
Wood Products
15,232
2,896
31,948
8,548
Eliminations and adjustments
(1,178
)
1,634
(106
)
4,160
38,940
40,057
85,109
89,211
Corporate
(16,457
)
(11,235
)
(45,780
)
(39,962
)
Income before income taxes
$
22,483
$
28,822
$
39,329
$
49,249
Depreciation, depletion and amortization:
Resource
$
6,061
$
6,519
$
12,071
$
13,851
Real Estate
9
21
27
21
Wood Products
1,507
1,925
5,013
5,906
7,577
8,465
17,111
19,778
Corporate
725
627
2,160
3,138
Total depreciation, depletion and amortization
$
8,302
$
9,092
$
19,271
$
22,916
Basis of real estate sold:
Real Estate
$
397
$
2,714
$
1,806
$
13,287
Eliminations and adjustments
(16
)
(3,234
)
(183
)
(3,234
)
Total basis of real estate sold
$
381
$
(520
)
$
1,623
$
10,053
13
ITEM 2.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
This report contains, in addition to historical information, certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including without limitation, statements regarding recognition of compensation costs relating to our performance shares and RSUs, contributions to our qualified pension plans, U.S. housing market conditions, housing starts and recovery, harvest deferrals, 2012 harvest levels, log prices, lumber demand, sales volumes and prices, seasonal conditions, business conditions for our business segments, wood products industry recovery, demand for our properties, Resource segment results, Wood Products segment results, Real Estate segment results, closing of a conservation-related sale and similar matters. Words such as “anticipate,” “expect,” “will,” “intend,” “plan,” “target,” “project,” “believe,” “seek,” “schedule,” “estimate,” “could,” “can,” “may” and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements reflect our current views regarding future events based on estimates and assumptions and are therefore subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties and are not guarantees of future performance. Our actual results of operations could differ materially from our historical results or those expressed or implied by forward-looking statements contained in this report. For a nonexclusive listing of forward-looking statements and potential factors affecting our business, refer to
“Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information”
on page 1 and
“Risk Factors”
in Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2011
.
Forward-looking statements contained in this report present our views only as of the date of this report. Except as required under applicable law, we do not intend to issue updates concerning any future revisions of our views to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this report.
OVERVIEW
The operating results of our Resource, Real Estate and Wood Products business segments have been and will continue to be influenced by a variety of factors, including the cyclical nature of the forest products industry, which is largely dependent on the economy and U.S. housing starts, changes in timber prices and in harvest levels from our timberlands, competition, timberland valuations, demand for our non-strategic timberland for higher and better use purposes, the efficiency and level of capacity utilization of our wood products manufacturing operations, changes in our principal expenses such as log costs and fuel costs, asset dispositions or acquisitions, and other factors. The U.S. housing market remained weak going into the beginning of the year, with only slight improvements in housing starts expected through 2012. However, we are seeing and experiencing indications that the domestic housing market has finally bottomed and is headed toward a recovery.
Stronger than anticipated demand for manufactured wood products that began in the first quarter has continued to positively impact our operations through the third quarter, particularly in our Wood Products segment. Prices and sales volumes showed substantial improvement over the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2011. Lumber prices increased 21% and 13%, respectively, in the third quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2012 over the comparable 2011 periods. We increased our production and shipments in the first quarter to take advantage of the greater demand, and have continued operating at this higher level through the third quarter. This combination of factors resulted in our Wood Products segment having very strong operating results for both the third quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2012.
In late 2011 we announced a harvest deferral from 4.1 million tons to 3.5 million tons in 2012. As a result, total harvest volumes for the third quarter and first nine months of 2012 decreased 11% and 14%, respectively, from the comparable periods in 2011. Harvest volume variances and price changes vary between our Northern and Southern regions, and between sawlogs and pulpwood. As a result of the decreased harvest in 2012, there were reductions in depletion and logging and hauling expenses, but these were partially offset by the increased cost of fuel.
Our Real Estate segment had solid results for the first nine months of 2012, with a large number of rural real estate and higher and better use, or HBU, acres sold. The product type sales prices per acre were relatively consistent between periods for our rural real estate and HBU properties. Results decreased from comparable periods in 2011 because the product mix of real estate sales changed, away from the larger non-strategic timberland sales. However, the current product mix of sales represents a solid base for our Real Estate segment.
While the third quarter and year-to-date results from our Resource and Real Estate segments were below those of the comparable periods in 2011, they met or exceeded our expectations. In our Wood Products business, prices have begun their normal seasonal softening, but they remain well above the prices expected earlier in the year. We anticipate lumber prices will bottom out in the first half of the fourth quarter before beginning to climb again as we move closer to the end of the year. At this time we still expect our 2012 harvest to be approximately 3.5 million tons. Our Resource segment is beginning to benefit from the improved demand and higher lumber pricing in the wood products industry, particularly in Idaho. However, we expect
14
log prices to decrease slightly in the fourth quarter due to seasonal factors and product mix. Interest and demand for our rural real estate properties and non-strategic timberlands remain str
ong. We have an approximately 2,000-acre, $11 million conservation-related sale of HBU property scheduled before year-end, so w
e expect solid results from our Real Estate segment in the fourth quarter. Actual product-type mix and the mix among regions will continue to be large factors in the segment's operating results.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
We are a real estate investment trust, or REIT, with approximately 1.43 million acres of timberlands in Arkansas, Idaho and Minnesota. Through wholly owned taxable subsidiaries, which we refer to in this report as Potlatch TRS, we operate a real estate sales and development business and five manufacturing facilities that produce lumber and plywood.
Our business is organized into three reporting segments: Resource, Real Estate and Wood Products. Sales between segments are recorded as intersegment revenues based on prevailing market prices. Because our Resource segment supplies our Wood Products segment with a portion of its wood fiber needs, intersegment revenues can represent a significant portion of the Resource segment’s total revenues. Our other segments generally do not generate intersegment revenues.
In the period-to-period discussions of our results of operations below, when we discuss our consolidated revenues, contributions by each of the segments to our revenues are reported after elimination of intersegment revenues. In the “Discussion of Business Segments” sections below, segment revenues are presented before elimination of intersegment revenues.
Quarter Ended
September 30, 2012
Compared to Quarter Ended
September 30, 2011
The following table sets forth period-to-period changes in items included in our Consolidated Statements of Income for the quarters ended
September 30
:
(Dollars in thousands)
2012
2011
Increase
(Decrease)
Revenues
$
151,911
$
152,891
$
(980
)
Costs and expenses:
Cost of goods sold
109,806
108,420
1,386
Selling, general and administrative expenses
13,342
7,837
5,505
Asset impairment charge
—
1,180
(1,180
)
123,148
117,437
5,711
Operating income
28,763
35,454
(6,691
)
Interest expense, net
(6,280
)
(6,632
)
(352
)
Income before income taxes
22,483
28,822
(6,339
)
Income tax provision
(3,884
)
(3,223
)
661
Net income
$
18,599
$
25,599
$
(7,000
)
Revenues –
Revenues decreased
$1.0 million
, or
1%
, in the
third
quarter of
2012
from the same period in
2011
, as a result of decreased revenues from our Real Estate and Resource segments, primarily due to fewer acres of real estate sold and our planned harvest deferral, respectively, partially offset by increased sales in our Wood Products segment. A more detailed discussion of revenues follows in “Discussion of Business Segments.”
Cost of goods sold –
Cost of goods sold increased
$1.4 million
, or
1%
, in the
third
quarter of
2012
over the
third
quarter of
2011
, primarily due to increased log usage in the Wood Products segment due to increased production, partially offset by a lower basis of real estate sold and reduced logging and hauling costs and depletion resulting from the harvest deferral.
Selling, general and administrative expenses –
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased
$5.5 million
, or
70%
, in the
third
quarter of
2012
over the same period in
2011
, primarily due to higher pension and OPEB expenses related to our legacy plans of $1.6 million and non-cash mark to market adjustments in our deferred compensation plans of $2.6 million.
Asset impairment charge –
We recorded a $1.2 million asset impairment charge to reflect the markdown to fair value of a building that was listed for sale during the third quarter of 2011.
15
Interest expense, net –
Net interest expense decreased
$0.4 million
, or
5%
, in the
third
quarter of 2012 from the same period in
2011
, primarily due to reduced interest expense associated with the maturity and redemption of $21.7 million of debt in the first half of 2012.
Income tax provision –
For the quarters ended
September 30, 2012
and
2011
, we recorded income tax provisions related to Potlatch TRS of $3.9 million and $3.2 million, respectively, due to pre-tax income.
DISCUSSION OF BUSINESS SEGMENTS
Quarter Ended
September 30,
(Dollars in thousands)
2012
2011
Increase
(Decrease)
Segment Revenues:
Resource
$
82,144
$
86,770
$
(4,626
)
Real Estate
2,353
14,809
(12,456
)
Wood Products
86,732
69,239
17,493
Total segment revenues, before eliminations
$
171,229
$
170,818
$
411
Segment Operating Income:
Resource
$
23,631
$
25,598
$
(1,967
)
Real Estate
1,255
9,929
(8,674
)
Wood Products
15,232
2,896
12,336
Total segment operating income, before eliminations and adjustments, and corporate items
$
40,118
$
38,423
$
1,695
Resource Segment –
Revenues for the segment decreased
$4.6 million
, or
5%
, during the third quarter of 2012 from the third quarter of 2011. Total harvest volumes decreased 11% in the third quarter of 2012 compared to the same quarter in 2011, due to the planned harvest deferral, primarily in our Southern region. These reduced volumes accounted for negative $9.7 million of the revenue variance, while slightly higher prices offset the volume variance by positive $4.9 million.
In our Northern region, total harvest volumes decreased 4% in the third quarter of 2012 from the third quarter of 2011 primarily due to the harvest deferral in 2012 and higher than normal harvest levels in the third quarter of 2011 when a portion of the harvest was shifted from our Southern region into Idaho to capture better pricing opportunities. In addition, the late spring break-up in Idaho in the second quarter of 2011 pushed additional harvest volume into the third quarter of 2011. As a result, sawlog volumes decreased 5% in the third quarter of 2012 compared to the same quarter in 2011. Sawlog prices increased 3%, primarily due to improved lumber prices. Northern pulpwood volumes remained flat between the periods, with Idaho maximizing production during the quarter due to increased pricing, while production in Minnesota decreased due to increased harvesting in the second quarter of 2012 as a result of unusually good spring weather. Pulpwood prices increased 4% due to stronger demand in Idaho than in 2011, partially offset by weaker demand in Minnesota due to the increased harvesting in the second quarter of 2012.
In our Southern region, total harvest volumes decreased 25% in the third quarter of 2012 from the same period in 2011. Sawlog volume decreased 35% due to the harvest deferral in 2012. Sawlog prices increased 4% as a result of a shift in product mix to higher priced hardwoods. Southern pulpwood volumes decreased 14% between the periods due to the harvest deferral in 2012, as well as increased volumes in the third quarter of 2011 as thinning operations on our pine plantations resulted in increased pulpwood volumes. Pulpwood prices increased 12% primarily due to a shift in product mix to more hardwoods and increased prices for both pine and hardwoods.
Expenses for the segment decreased $2.6 million, or 4%, during the third quarter of 2012 from the third quarter of 2011, primarily related to lower logging and hauling costs and depletion due to the decreased harvest levels. Operating income for our Resource segment decreased
$2.0 million
, or
8%
, in the third quarter of 2012 from the same period in 2011.
16
The following table summarizes our harvest levels for the quarters ended
September 30
:
(Volume in tons)
2012
2011
Northern region
Sawlog
785,240
824,483
Pulpwood
123,420
122,947
Stumpage
6,717
6,063
Total
915,377
953,493
Southern region
Sawlog
161,274
247,253
Pulpwood
213,092
247,668
Stumpage
—
7,312
Total
374,366
502,233
Total harvest volume
1,289,743
1,455,726
Real Estate Segment –
Revenues decreased
$12.5 million
, expenses decreased $3.8 million and operating income decreased
$8.7 million
in the third quarter of 2012 compared to the same period in 2011 as a result of fewer acres sold and the mix of types of acres sold. Results for the third quarter of 2011 included the third and final phase of a large non-strategic timberland and rural real estate land sale transaction in Idaho.
The following table summarizes our real estate sales for the quarters ended
September 30
:
2012
2011
Acres Sold
Average
Price/Acre
Acres Sold
Average
Price/Acre
Higher and better use (HBU)
280
$
2,444
966
$
2,074
Rural real estate
674
1,146
3,663
1,221
Non-strategic timberland
1,231
728
5,612
1,485
Total
2,185
10,241
Wood Products –
Revenues for the segment increased
$17.5 million
, or
25%
, in the
third
quarter of
2012
over the same period in
2011
. Lumber prices and volumes increased 21% and 4%, respectively, over the previous year due to improved demand in the third quarter of 2012. Expenses for the segment increased $5.2 million, or 8%, in the third quarter of 2012 over the same quarter of 2011, primarily as a result of increased log usage, slightly higher log prices, and additional wages and benefits costs associated with increased production volume. There was no lumber hedge activity in the third quarter of 2012, but we recognized a benefit of $2.0 million from a mark to market adjustment in the third quarter of 2011. Operating income for the segment was
$15.2 million
for the third quarter of 2012 compared to
$2.9 million
in the third quarter of 2011.
17
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2012
Compared to
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2011
The following table sets forth period-to-period changes in items included in our Consolidated Statements of Income for the
nine
months ended
September 30
:
(Dollars in thousands)
2012
2011
Increase
(Decrease)
Revenues
$
381,835
$
387,494
$
(5,659
)
Costs and expenses:
Cost of goods sold
287,469
287,473
(4
)
Selling, general and administrative expenses
35,994
28,469
7,525
Asset impairment charge
—
1,180
(1,180
)
323,463
317,122
6,341
Operating income
58,372
70,372
(12,000
)
Interest expense, net
(19,043
)
(21,123
)
(2,080
)
Income before income taxes
39,329
49,249
(9,920
)
Income tax provision
(10,599
)
(7,505
)
3,094
Net income
$
28,730
$
41,744
$
(13,014
)
Revenues –
Revenues decreased
$5.7 million
, or
1%
, in the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2012
from the same period in
2011
, as a result of decreased revenues from our Real Estate and Resource segments, primarily due to fewer acres of real estate sold and our planned harvest deferral, respectively, partially offset by increased sales in our Wood Products segment. A more detailed discussion of revenues follows in “Discussion of Business Segments.”
Cost of goods sold –
Cost of goods sold was basically unchanged between the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2012
and 2011. In our Resource segment, logging and hauling costs and depletion decreased as a result of the harvest deferral, but were partially offset by higher fuel costs, and in our Real Estate segment, costs decreased due to a lower basis of real estate sold. These decreases were offset by increased log usage in the Wood Products segment due to increased production.
Selling, general and administrative expenses –
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased
$7.5 million
, or
26%
, in the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2012
over the same period in
2011
, primarily due to higher legacy employee compensation related expenses of $4.7 million and non-cash mark to market adjustments in our deferred compensation plans of $2.1 million.
Asset impairment charge –
We recorded a $1.2 million asset impairment charge to reflect the markdown to fair value of a building that was listed for sale during the third quarter of 2011.
Interest expense, net –
Net interest expense decreased
$2.1 million
, or
10%
, in the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2012
from the same period in
2011
, primarily due to a $1.2 million non-cash charge for deferred costs related to the reduction in our revolving credit facility in the first quarter of 2011 and reduced interest expense associated with the maturity and redemption of $21.7 million of debt in the first half of 2012.
Income tax provision –
For the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2012
and
2011
, we recorded income tax provisions related to Potlatch TRS of $10.5 million and $7.5 million, respectively, due to pre-tax income. For the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2012
, we recorded income tax expense of $0.1 million related to the sale of REIT properties.
18
DISCUSSION OF BUSINESS SEGMENTS
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
(Dollars in thousands)
2012
2011
Increase
(Decrease)
Segment Revenues:
Resource
$
156,486
$
172,587
$
(16,101
)
Real Estate
19,181
46,808
(27,627
)
Wood Products
244,279
204,343
39,936
Total segment revenues, before eliminations
$
419,946
$
423,738
$
(3,792
)
Segment Operating Income:
Resource
$
39,011
$
47,208
$
(8,197
)
Real Estate
14,256
29,295
(15,039
)
Wood Products
31,948
8,548
23,400
Total segment operating income, before eliminations and adjustments, and corporate items
$
85,215
$
85,051
$
164
Resource Segment –
Revenues for the segment decreased
$16.1 million
, or
9%
, during the first
nine
months of
2012
from the same period in
2011
, as total harvest volumes decreased 14% as a result of the harvest deferral, partially offset by increased prices. The reduced volumes accounted for a negative $23.0 million variance, offset by a positive pricing variance of $6.9 million.
In our Northern region, total harvest volumes decreased 6% in the first nine months of 2012 from the same period in 2011. Sawlog volumes decreased 7%, primarily due to the harvest deferral in 2012. Sawlog prices increased 2%, primarily due to improved lumber prices. Northern pulpwood prices increased 8% due to a general increase in demand, which resulted in a 1% increase in volumes.
In our Southern region, total harvest volumes decreased 25% in the first nine months of 2012 from the same period in 2011. Sawlog volumes and prices decreased 34% and 3%, respectively, primarily due to the harvest deferral. Southern pulpwood volumes decreased 14% between periods due to the harvest deferral, as well as increased volumes in the third quarter of 2011 as thinning operations on our pine plantations resulted in increased pulpwood volumes. A shift to higher priced hardwoods and increased prices for both pine and hardwoods resulted in a 6% increase in pulpwood prices.
Expenses for the segment decreased $7.9 million, or 6%, during the first nine months of 2012 compared to the same period of 2011, primarily related to lower logging and hauling costs and depletion due to the decreased harvest levels, partially offset by the increased cost of fuel. Operating income for our Resource segment decreased
$8.2 million
, or
17%
, in the first nine months of 2012 from the same period of 2011.
19
The following table summarizes our harvest levels for the
nine
months ended
September 30
:
(Volume in tons)
2012
2011
Northern region
Sawlog
1,445,772
1,546,925
Pulpwood
268,256
264,532
Stumpage
34,016
38,619
Total
1,748,044
1,850,076
Southern region
Sawlog
445,834
672,557
Pulpwood
517,215
600,043
Stumpage
—
15,006
Total
963,049
1,287,606
Total harvest volume
2,711,093
3,137,682
Real Estate Segment –
Revenues decreased
$27.6 million
, expenses decreased $12.6 million and operating income decreased
$15.0 million
in the first
nine
months of
2012
compared to the same period in
2011
as a result of fewer acres sold and the mix of types of acres sold. The results for the first nine months of 2011 included four large non-strategic timberland and rural real estate sales in Idaho. The product type sales prices per acre were relatively consistent between periods for HBU and rural real estate properties.
The following table summarizes our real estate sales for the
nine
months ended
September 30
:
2012
2011
Acres Sold
Average
Price/Acre
Acres Sold
Average
Price/Acre
Higher and better use (HBU)
4,238
$
1,985
2,126
$
2,031
Rural real estate
7,346
1,165
8,294
1,244
Non-strategic timberland
3,312
668
23,859
1,348
Total
14,896
34,279
Wood Products –
Revenues for the segment increased
$39.9 million
, or
20%
, in the first
nine
months of
2012
over the same period in
2011
as a result of both increased sales volumes and prices. Lumber prices and volumes increased 13% and 9%, respectively, over the previous year due to improved demand. Expenses for the segment increased $16.5 million, or 8%, in the first nine months of 2012 over the same period in 2011, primarily as a result of increased log usage, slightly higher log prices and additional wages and benefits costs associated with increased production volume. The net effect of our lumber hedge was $0.9 million of expense in the first nine months of 2012 compared to $5.0 million of income in the 2011 period. Operating income for the segment was
$31.9 million
for the first nine months of 2012 compared to
$8.5 million
in the first nine months of 2011.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
At
September 30, 2012
, our financial position included long-term debt of
$345.7 million
compared to
$366.4 million
at December 31, 2011.
Stockholders’ equity for the first
nine
months of 2012 decreased
$2.3 million
primarily due to the payment of our quarterly cash distributions to common stockholders totaling
$37.5 million
, partially offset by net income of
$28.7 million
. The ratio o
f long-term debt to stockholders’ equity was
2.5
to 1 at
September 30, 2012
compared to
2.6
to 1 at December 31, 2011.
20
Working capital totaled
$63.3 million
at
September 30, 2012
, an increase of $6.1 million from the December 31, 2011 balance of
$57.2 million
. The significant changes in the components of working capital are as follows:
•
The current portion of long-term debt decreased
$13.2 million
due to the maturity and redemption of $21.7 million of debt in the first half of 2012, partially offset by the scheduled maturity of $8.4 million of debt in August 2013.
•
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities increased $11.1 million as a result of higher trade payables due to increased logging activities, plus accruals for interest and non-income tax payments.
•
Receivables increased $11.0 million primarily due to increased trade receivables due to the seasonal effects in the Resource segment and increased Wood Products sales.
•
Cash and short-term investments decreased
$8.3 million
primarily due to the payment of our quarterly cash distributions to common stockholders totaling
$37.5 million
and the redemption of debt mentioned above, partially offset by the additional cash generated by our improved business results.
•
Inventories increased
$0.8 million
due to increased production of our manufactured wood products during the first nine months of 2012 that resulted in a $1.2 million increase in our lumber and manufactured wood products inventory, offset by a $0.7 million reduction in our log inventory.
Cash Flows Summary
The following table presents information regarding our cash flows for the
nine
months ended
September 30
:
(Dollars in thousands)
2012
2011
Net cash provided by operating activities
$
43,033
$
72,106
Net cash provided by (used for) investing activities
18,225
(2,898
)
Net cash used for financing activities
(60,044
)
(68,584
)
Increase in cash
1,214
624
Cash at beginning of period
7,819
5,593
Cash at end of period
$
9,033
$
6,217
Net cash provided by operating activities for the first nine months of 2012 totaled
$43.0 million
, compared to
$72.1 million
for the same period in 2011. The decrease between periods was primarily due to increased funding of our qualified pension plans, the decrease in cash generated from real estate sales and lower net income in the first nine months of 2012 compared to the same period in 2011.
Net cash provided by investing activities totaled
$18.2 million
for the first nine months of 2012. Net cash used for investing activities totaled
$2.9 million
for the first nine months of 2011. During the first nine months of 2012, we borrowed $21.8 million against our COLI plan, based on the cash surrender value that had accumulated over the years, to fund our 2012 pension contributions. In addition, a $9.6 million net decrease in short-term investments was partially offset by $11.9 million of capital expenditures. In the first nine months of 2011, $12.1 million of capital expenditures was partially offset by a $10.6 million net decrease in short-term investments. Capital expenditures in both periods were primarily for reforestation activities and routine general replacement projects associated with our wood products manufacturing facilities.
Net cash used for financing activities totaled
$60.0 million
and
$68.6 million
for the first nine months of 2012 and 2011, respectively. Net cash used for financing activities in the first nine months of 2012 was primarily for payment of our quarterly cash distributions to common stockholders of
$37.5 million
and debt maturities and redemptions of $21.7 million. Net cash used for financing activities in the first nine months of 2011 was primarily for payment of our quarterly cash distributions to common stockholders of $61.5 million and a debt maturity and redemption of $5.0 million.
As of
September 30, 2012
, there were no borrowings outstanding under the revolving line of credit, and approximately $1.9 million of the letter of credit subfacility was being used to support several outstanding letters of credit. Available borrowing capacity at
September 30, 2012
was $148.1 million.
21
The following table sets forth the most restrictive covenants in the bank credit facility and our status with respect to these covenants as of
September 30, 2012
:
Covenant Requirement
Actual at
September 30, 2012
Minimum Interest Coverage Ratio
2.00 to 1.00
3.38 to 1.00
Minimum Collateral Coverage Ratio
3.00 to 1.00
3.62 to 1.00
Maximum Funded Indebtedness to Capitalization Ratio
70.0%
55.5%
Minimum Liquidity Requirement
$60.0 million
$210.5 million
Our senior notes contain covenants that limit our ability to distribute cash to our shareholders, such as through the payment of dividends and repurchase of our capital stock, unless certain financial conditions are met. Our cumulative Funds Available for Distribution, or FAD, as defined in the covenant, less our dividends paid was $28.4 million at
September 30, 2012
. The remaining balance available for the payment of future dividends pursuant to the covenant was $90.1 million at
September 30, 2012
.
Contractual Obligations
There have been no material changes to our contractual obligations in the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2012
outside the ordinary course of business.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We currently are not a party to off-balance sheet arrangements that would require disclosure under this section.
ITEM 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
In February 2012, we entered into two lumber swap contracts to mitigate commodity price risk related to sales by our Wood Products segment. These contracts cash settled during the second quarter of 2012. See Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information about the lumber commodity swaps.
Other than for the lumber commodity swaps above, our exposures to market risk have not changed materially since December 31, 2011. For quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk, see Item 7A –
“Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk”
in our 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 4.
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We conducted an evaluation (pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act), under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e)) as of
September 30, 2012
. These disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports that are filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms. Our disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that this information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on the evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of
September 30, 2012
.
There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives.
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
In the
nine months ended September 30
,
2012
there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that would materially affect or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.
22
Part II
ITEM 1.
Legal Proceedings
Other than the environmental matter described in Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements included in this report, we believe there is no pending or threatened litigation that would have a material adverse effect on our financial position, operations or liquidity.
ITEM 1A.
Risk Factors
There have been no material changes in the risk factors previously disclosed in
“Risk Factors”
in Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2011
.
ITEM 6.
Exhibits
The exhibit index is located on page 25 of this Form 10-Q.
23
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
POTLATCH CORPORATION
(Registrant)
By
/s/ Eric J. Cremers
Eric J. Cremers
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Duly Authorized; Principal Financial Officer)
By
/s/ Terry L. Carter
Terry L. Carter
Controller and Treasurer
(Duly Authorized; Principal Accounting Officer)
Date:
October 23, 2012
24
POTLATCH CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
EXHIBIT INDEX
EXHIBIT
NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
(3)(a)*
Second Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant, effective February 3, 2006, filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Registrant on February 6, 2006.
(3)(b)*
Bylaws of the Registrant, as amended through February 18, 2009, filed as Exhibit (3)(b) to the Current Report on Form 8K filed by the Registrant on February 20, 2009.
(4)
Registrant undertakes to furnish to the Commission, upon request, any instrument defining the rights of holders of long-term debt.
(31)
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications.
(32)
Furnished statements of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer under 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
101
The following financial information from Potlatch Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2012, filed on October 23, 2012, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Statements of Income for the quarters and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the quarters and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, (iii) the Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, (iv) the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, and (v) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
* Incorporated by reference
25