Companies:
10,652
total market cap:
$139.938 T
Sign In
๐บ๐ธ
EN
English
$ USD
โฌ
EUR
๐ช๐บ
โน
INR
๐ฎ๐ณ
ยฃ
GBP
๐ฌ๐ง
$
CAD
๐จ๐ฆ
$
AUD
๐ฆ๐บ
$
NZD
๐ณ๐ฟ
$
HKD
๐ญ๐ฐ
$
SGD
๐ธ๐ฌ
Global ranking
Ranking by countries
America
๐บ๐ธ United States
๐จ๐ฆ Canada
๐ฒ๐ฝ Mexico
๐ง๐ท Brazil
๐จ๐ฑ Chile
Europe
๐ช๐บ European Union
๐ฉ๐ช Germany
๐ฌ๐ง United Kingdom
๐ซ๐ท France
๐ช๐ธ Spain
๐ณ๐ฑ Netherlands
๐ธ๐ช Sweden
๐ฎ๐น Italy
๐จ๐ญ Switzerland
๐ต๐ฑ Poland
๐ซ๐ฎ Finland
Asia
๐จ๐ณ China
๐ฏ๐ต Japan
๐ฐ๐ท South Korea
๐ญ๐ฐ Hong Kong
๐ธ๐ฌ Singapore
๐ฎ๐ฉ Indonesia
๐ฎ๐ณ India
๐ฒ๐พ Malaysia
๐น๐ผ Taiwan
๐น๐ญ Thailand
๐ป๐ณ Vietnam
Others
๐ฆ๐บ Australia
๐ณ๐ฟ New Zealand
๐ฎ๐ฑ Israel
๐ธ๐ฆ Saudi Arabia
๐น๐ท Turkey
๐ท๐บ Russia
๐ฟ๐ฆ South Africa
>> All Countries
Ranking by categories
๐ All assets by Market Cap
๐ Automakers
โ๏ธ Airlines
๐ซ Airports
โ๏ธ Aircraft manufacturers
๐ฆ Banks
๐จ Hotels
๐ Pharmaceuticals
๐ E-Commerce
โ๏ธ Healthcare
๐ฆ Courier services
๐ฐ Media/Press
๐ท Alcoholic beverages
๐ฅค Beverages
๐ Clothing
โ๏ธ Mining
๐ Railways
๐ฆ Insurance
๐ Real estate
โ Ports
๐ผ Professional services
๐ด Food
๐ Restaurant chains
โ๐ป Software
๐ Semiconductors
๐ฌ Tobacco
๐ณ Financial services
๐ข Oil&Gas
๐ Electricity
๐งช Chemicals
๐ฐ Investment
๐ก Telecommunication
๐๏ธ Retail
๐ฅ๏ธ Internet
๐ Construction
๐ฎ Video Game
๐ป Tech
๐ฆพ AI
>> All Categories
ETFs
๐ All ETFs
๐๏ธ Bond ETFs
๏ผ Dividend ETFs
โฟ Bitcoin ETFs
โข Ethereum ETFs
๐ช Crypto Currency ETFs
๐ฅ Gold ETFs & ETCs
๐ฅ Silver ETFs & ETCs
๐ข๏ธ Oil ETFs & ETCs
๐ฝ Commodities ETFs & ETNs
๐ Emerging Markets ETFs
๐ Small-Cap ETFs
๐ Low volatility ETFs
๐ Inverse/Bear ETFs
โฌ๏ธ Leveraged ETFs
๐ Global/World ETFs
๐บ๐ธ USA ETFs
๐บ๐ธ S&P 500 ETFs
๐บ๐ธ Dow Jones ETFs
๐ช๐บ Europe ETFs
๐จ๐ณ China ETFs
๐ฏ๐ต Japan ETFs
๐ฎ๐ณ India ETFs
๐ฌ๐ง UK ETFs
๐ฉ๐ช Germany ETFs
๐ซ๐ท France ETFs
โ๏ธ Mining ETFs
โ๏ธ Gold Mining ETFs
โ๏ธ Silver Mining ETFs
๐งฌ Biotech ETFs
๐ฉโ๐ป Tech ETFs
๐ Real Estate ETFs
โ๏ธ Healthcare ETFs
โก Energy ETFs
๐ Renewable Energy ETFs
๐ก๏ธ Insurance ETFs
๐ฐ Water ETFs
๐ด Food & Beverage ETFs
๐ฑ Socially Responsible ETFs
๐ฃ๏ธ Infrastructure ETFs
๐ก Innovation ETFs
๐ Semiconductors ETFs
๐ Aerospace & Defense ETFs
๐ Cybersecurity ETFs
๐ฆพ Artificial Intelligence ETFs
Watchlist
Account
Entergy
ETR
#560
Rank
$43.29 B
Marketcap
๐บ๐ธ
United States
Country
$96.94
Share price
1.52%
Change (1 day)
20.69%
Change (1 year)
๐ Electricity
๐ฐ Utility companies
โก Energy
Categories
Market cap
Revenue
Earnings
Price history
P/E ratio
P/S ratio
More
Price history
P/E ratio
P/S ratio
P/B ratio
Operating margin
EPS
Dividends
Dividend yield
Shares outstanding
Fails to deliver
Cost to borrow
Total assets
Total liabilities
Total debt
Cash on Hand
Net Assets
Annual Reports (10-K)
Entergy
Quarterly Reports (10-Q)
Financial Year FY2015 Q2
Entergy - 10-Q quarterly report FY2015 Q2
Text size:
Small
Medium
Large
Table of Contents
__________________________________________________________________________________________
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
X
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2015
OR
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13
OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ____________ to ____________
Commission
File Number
Registrant, State of Incorporation or Organization, Address of Principal Executive Offices, Telephone Number, and IRS Employer Identification No.
Commission
File Number
Registrant, State of Incorporation or Organization, Address of Principal Executive Offices, Telephone Number, and IRS Employer Identification No.
1-11299
ENTERGY CORPORATION
(a Delaware corporation)
639 Loyola Avenue
New Orleans, Louisiana 70113
Telephone (504) 576-4000
72-1229752
1-31508
ENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, INC.
(a Mississippi corporation)
308 East Pearl Street
Jackson, Mississippi 39201
Telephone (601) 368-5000
64-0205830
1-10764
ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC.
(an Arkansas corporation)
425 West Capitol Avenue
Little Rock, Arkansas 72201
Telephone (501) 377-4000
71-0005900
1-35747
ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, INC.
(a Louisiana corporation)
1600 Perdido Street
New Orleans, Louisiana 70112
Telephone (504) 670-3700
72-0273040
0-20371
ENTERGY GULF STATES LOUISIANA, L.L.C.
(a Louisiana limited liability company)
4809 Jefferson Highway
Jefferson, Louisiana 70121
Telephone (504) 576-4000
74-0662730
1-34360
ENTERGY TEXAS, INC.
(a Texas corporation)
9425 Pinecroft
The Woodlands, Texas 77380
Telephone (409) 981-2000
61-1435798
1-32718
ENTERGY LOUISIANA, LLC
(a Texas limited liability company)
4809 Jefferson Highway
Jefferson, Louisiana 70121
Telephone (504) 576-4000
75-3206126
1-09067
SYSTEM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.
(an Arkansas corporation)
Echelon One
1340 Echelon Parkway
Jackson, Mississippi 39213
Telephone (601) 368-5000
72-0752777
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Table of Contents
Indicate by check mark whether the registrants (1) have filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrants were required to file such reports), and (2) have been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
R
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrants have submitted electronically and posted on Entergy’s corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
R
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Large
accelerated
filer
Accelerated
filer
Non-
accelerated
filer
Smaller
reporting
company
Entergy Corporation
ü
Entergy Arkansas, Inc.
ü
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, L.L.C.
ü
Entergy Louisiana, LLC
ü
Entergy Mississippi, Inc.
ü
Entergy New Orleans, Inc.
ü
Entergy Texas, Inc.
ü
System Energy Resources, Inc.
ü
Indicate by check mark whether the registrants are shell companies (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes
o
No
R
Common Stock Outstanding
Outstanding at July 31, 2015
Entergy Corporation
($0.01 par value)
179,528,314
Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Inc., Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, L.L.C., Entergy Louisiana, LLC, Entergy Mississippi, Inc., Entergy New Orleans, Inc., Entergy Texas, Inc., and System Energy Resources, Inc. separately file this combined Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Information contained herein relating to any individual company is filed by such company on its own behalf. Each company reports herein only as to itself and makes no other representations whatsoever as to any other company. This combined Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q supplements and updates the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the calendar year ended December 31, 2014 and the Quarterly Report for Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2015, filed by the individual registrants with the SEC, and should be read in conjunction therewith.
Table of Contents
ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX TO QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
June 30, 2015
Page Number
Forward-looking information
iii
Definitions
v
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis
1
Consolidated Income Statements
20
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
21
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
22
Consolidated Balance Sheets
24
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity
26
Selected Operating Results
27
Notes to Financial Statements
28
Part 1. Item 4. Controls and Procedures
91
Entergy Arkansas, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis
92
Consolidated Income Statements
100
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
101
Consolidated Balance Sheets
102
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Common Equity
104
Selected Operating Results
105
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, L.L.C.
Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis
106
Income Statements
115
Statements of Comprehensive Income
116
Statements of Cash Flows
117
Balance Sheets
118
Statements of Changes in Equity
120
Selected Operating Results
121
Entergy Louisiana, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis
122
Consolidated Income Statements
131
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
132
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
133
Consolidated Balance Sheets
134
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity
136
Selected Operating Results
137
Entergy Mississippi, Inc.
Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis
138
Income Statements
145
Statements of Cash Flows
147
Balance Sheets
148
i
Table of Contents
ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX TO QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
June 30, 2015
Page Number
Statements of Changes in Common Equity
150
Selected Operating Results
151
Entergy New Orleans, Inc.
Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis
152
Income Statements
158
Statements of Cash Flows
159
Balance Sheets
160
Statements of Changes in Common Equity
162
Selected Operating Results
163
Entergy Texas, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis
164
Consolidated Income Statements
172
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
173
Consolidated Balance Sheets
174
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Common Equity
176
Selected Operating Results
177
System Energy Resources, Inc.
Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis
178
Income Statements
181
Statements of Cash Flows
183
Balance Sheets
184
Statements of Changes in Common Equity
186
Part II. Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
187
Item 1A. Risk Factors
187
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
187
Item 5. Other Information
188
Item 6. Exhibits
192
Signature
195
ii
Table of Contents
FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
In this combined report and from time to time, Entergy Corporation and the Registrant Subsidiaries each makes statements as a registrant concerning its expectations, beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, strategies, and future events or performance. Such statements are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Words such as “may,” “will,” “could,” “project,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “expect,” “estimate,” “continue,” “potential,” “plan,” “predict,” “forecast,” and other similar words or expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements but are not the only means to identify these statements. Although each of these registrants believes that these forward-looking statements and the underlying assumptions are reasonable, it cannot provide assurance that they will prove correct. Any forward-looking statement is based on information current as of the date of this combined report and speaks only as of the date on which such statement is made. Except to the extent required by the federal securities laws, these registrants undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.
Forward-looking statements involve a number of risks and uncertainties. There are factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements, including those factors discussed or incorporated by reference in (a) Item 1A. Risk Factors in the Form 10-K, (b) Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis in the Form 10-K and in this report, and (c) the following factors (in addition to others described elsewhere in this combined report and in subsequent securities filings):
•
resolution of pending and future rate cases and negotiations, including various performance-based rate discussions, Entergy’s utility supply plan, and recovery of fuel and purchased power costs;
•
the termination of Entergy Arkansas’s participation in the System Agreement, which occurred in December 2013, the termination of Entergy Mississippi’s participation in the System Agreement in November 2015, the termination of Entergy Texas’s, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana’s, and Entergy Louisiana’s participation in the System Agreement after expiration of the proposed 60-month notice period or such other period as approved by the FERC;
•
regulatory and operating challenges and uncertainties and economic risks associated with the Utility operating companies’ move to MISO, which occurred in December 2013, including the effect of current or projected MISO market rules and system conditions in the MISO markets, the allocation of MISO system transmission upgrade costs, and the effect of planning decisions that MISO makes with respect to future transmission investments by the Utility operating companies;
•
changes in utility regulation, including the beginning or end of retail and wholesale competition, the ability to recover net utility assets and other potential stranded costs, and the application of more stringent transmission reliability requirements or market power criteria by the FERC;
•
changes in the regulation or regulatory oversight of Entergy’s nuclear generating facilities and nuclear materials and fuel, including with respect to the planned or potential shutdown of nuclear generating facilities owned or operated by Entergy Wholesale Commodities, and the effects of new or existing safety or environmental concerns regarding nuclear power plants and nuclear fuel;
•
resolution of pending or future applications, and related regulatory proceedings and litigation, for license renewals or modifications or other authorizations required of nuclear generating facilities;
•
the performance of and deliverability of power from Entergy’s generation resources, including the capacity factors at its nuclear generating facilities;
•
Entergy’s ability to develop and execute on a point of view regarding future prices of electricity, natural gas, and other energy-related commodities;
•
prices for power generated by Entergy’s merchant generating facilities and the ability to hedge, meet credit support requirements for hedges, sell power forward or otherwise reduce the market price risk associated with those facilities, including the Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear plants;
•
the prices and availability of fuel and power Entergy must purchase for its Utility customers, and Entergy’s ability to meet credit support requirements for fuel and power supply contracts;
•
volatility and changes in markets for electricity, natural gas, uranium, emissions allowances, and other energy-related commodities, and the effect of those changes on Entergy and its customers;
iii
Table of Contents
FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION (Concluded)
•
changes in law resulting from federal or state energy legislation or legislation subjecting energy derivatives used in hedging and risk management transactions to governmental regulation;
•
changes in environmental, tax, and other laws, including requirements for reduced emissions of sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxide, greenhouse gases, mercury, and other regulated air and water emissions, and changes in costs of compliance with environmental and other laws and regulations;
•
uncertainty regarding the establishment of interim or permanent sites for spent nuclear fuel and nuclear waste storage and disposal and the level of spent fuel disposal fees charged by the U.S. government related to such sites;
•
variations in weather and the occurrence of hurricanes and other storms and disasters, including uncertainties associated with efforts to remediate the effects of hurricanes, ice storms, or other weather events and the recovery of costs associated with restoration, including accessing funded storm reserves, federal and local cost recovery mechanisms, securitization, and insurance;
•
effects of climate change;
•
changes in the quality and availability of water supplies and the related regulation of water use and diversion;
•
Entergy’s ability to manage its capital projects and operation and maintenance costs;
•
Entergy’s ability to purchase and sell assets at attractive prices and on other attractive terms;
•
the economic climate, and particularly economic conditions in Entergy’s Utility service area and the Northeast United States and events and circumstances that could influence economic conditions in those areas, and the risk that anticipated load growth may not materialize;
•
the effects of Entergy’s strategies to reduce tax payments;
•
changes in the financial markets, particularly those affecting the availability of capital and Entergy’s ability to refinance existing debt, execute share repurchase programs, and fund investments and acquisitions;
•
actions of rating agencies, including changes in the ratings of debt and preferred stock, changes in general corporate ratings, and changes in the rating agencies’ ratings criteria;
•
changes in inflation and interest rates;
•
the effect of litigation and government investigations or proceedings;
•
changes in technology, including with respect to new, developing, or alternative sources of generation;
•
the potential effects of threatened or actual terrorism, cyber attacks or data security breaches, including increased security costs, and war or a catastrophic event such as a nuclear accident or a natural gas pipeline explosion;
•
Entergy’s ability to attract and retain talented management and directors;
•
changes in accounting standards and corporate governance;
•
declines in the market prices of marketable securities and resulting funding requirements for Entergy’s defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans;
•
future wage and employee benefit costs, including changes in discount rates and returns on benefit plan assets;
•
changes in decommissioning trust fund values or earnings or in the timing of or cost to decommission nuclear plant sites;
•
the implementation of the shutdown of Vermont Yankee and the related decommissioning of Vermont Yankee;
•
the effectiveness of Entergy’s risk management policies and procedures and the ability and willingness of its counterparties to satisfy their financial and performance commitments;
•
factors that could lead to impairment of long-lived assets; and
•
the ability to successfully complete merger, acquisition, or divestiture plans, regulatory or other limitations imposed as a result of merger, acquisition, or divestiture, and the success of the business following a merger, acquisition, or divestiture.
iv
Table of Contents
DEFINITIONS
Certain abbreviations or acronyms used in the text and notes are defined below:
Abbreviation or Acronym
Term
AFUDC
Allowance for Funds Used During Construction
ALJ
Administrative Law Judge
ANO 1 and 2
Units 1 and 2 of Arkansas Nuclear One (nuclear), owned by Entergy Arkansas
APSC
Arkansas Public Service Commission
ASLB
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board, the board within the NRC that conducts hearings and performs other regulatory functions that the NRC authorizes
ASU
Accounting Standards Update issued by the FASB
Board
Board of Directors of Entergy Corporation
Cajun
Cajun Electric Power Cooperative, Inc.
capacity factor
Actual plant output divided by maximum potential plant output for the period
City Council or Council
Council of the City of New Orleans, Louisiana
D.C. Circuit
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
DOE
United States Department of Energy
Entergy
Entergy Corporation and its direct and indirect subsidiaries
Entergy Corporation
Entergy Corporation, a Delaware corporation
Entergy Gulf States, Inc.
Predecessor company for financial reporting purposes to Entergy Gulf States Louisiana that included the assets and business operations of both Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Texas
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, L.L.C., a company formally created as part of the jurisdictional separation of Entergy Gulf States, Inc. and the successor company to Entergy Gulf States, Inc. for financial reporting purposes. The term is also used to refer to the Louisiana jurisdictional business of Entergy Gulf States, Inc., as the context requires.
Entergy Texas
Entergy Texas, Inc., a company formally created as part of the jurisdictional separation of Entergy Gulf States, Inc. The term is also used to refer to the Texas jurisdictional business of Entergy Gulf States, Inc., as the context requires.
Entergy Wholesale
Commodities
Entergy’s non-utility business segment primarily comprised of the ownership, operation, and decommissioning of nuclear power plants, the ownership of interests in non-nuclear power plants, and the sale of the electric power produced by its operating power plants to wholesale customers
EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
FASB
Financial Accounting Standards Board
FERC
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
FitzPatrick
James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant (nuclear), owned by an Entergy subsidiary in the Entergy Wholesale Commodities business segment
Form 10-K
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the calendar year ended December 31, 2014 filed with the SEC by Entergy Corporation and its Registrant Subsidiaries
FTR
Financial transmission right
Grand Gulf
Unit No. 1 of Grand Gulf Nuclear Station (nuclear), 90% owned or leased by System Energy
GWh
Gigawatt-hour(s), which equals one million kilowatt-hours
Independence
Independence Steam Electric Station (coal), owned 16% by Entergy Arkansas, 25% by Entergy Mississippi, and 7% by Entergy Power, LLC
Indian Point 2
Unit 2 of Indian Point Energy Center (nuclear), owned by an Entergy subsidiary in the Entergy Wholesale Commodities business segment
Indian Point 3
Unit 3 of Indian Point Energy Center (nuclear), owned by an Entergy subsidiary in the Entergy Wholesale Commodities business segment
v
Table of Contents
DEFINITIONS (Concluded)
Abbreviation or Acronym
Term
IRS
Internal Revenue Service
ISO
Independent System Operator
kW
Kilowatt, which equals one thousand watts
kWh
Kilowatt-hour(s)
LPSC
Louisiana Public Service Commission
MISO
Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc., a regional transmission organization
MMBtu
One million British Thermal Units
MPSC
Mississippi Public Service Commission
MW
Megawatt(s), which equals one thousand kilowatts
MWh
Megawatt-hour(s)
Net debt to net capital ratio
Gross debt less cash and cash equivalents divided by total capitalization less cash and cash equivalents
Net MW in operation
Installed capacity owned and operated
NRC
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
NYPA
New York Power Authority
Palisades
Palisades Power Plant (nuclear), owned by an Entergy subsidiary in the Entergy Wholesale Commodities business segment
Pilgrim
Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station (nuclear), owned by an Entergy subsidiary in the Entergy Wholesale Commodities business segment
PPA
Purchased power agreement or power purchase agreement
PUCT
Public Utility Commission of Texas
Registrant Subsidiaries
Entergy Arkansas, Inc., Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, L.L.C., Entergy Louisiana, LLC, Entergy Mississippi, Inc., Entergy New Orleans, Inc., Entergy Texas, Inc., and System Energy Resources, Inc.
River Bend
River Bend Station (nuclear), owned by Entergy Gulf States Louisiana
RTO
Regional transmission organization
SEC
Securities and Exchange Commission
System Agreement
Agreement, effective January 1, 1983, as modified, among the Utility operating companies relating to the sharing of generating capacity and other power resources. Entergy Arkansas terminated its participation in the System Agreement effective December 18, 2013.
System Energy
System Energy Resources, Inc.
TWh
Terawatt-hour(s), which equals one billion kilowatt-hours
Unit Power Sales Agreement
Agreement, dated as of June 10, 1982, as amended and approved by FERC, among Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, and System Energy, relating to the sale of capacity and energy from System Energy’s share of Grand Gulf
Utility
Entergy’s business segment that generates, transmits, distributes, and sells electric power, with a small amount of natural gas distribution
Utility operating companies
Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, and Entergy Texas
Vermont Yankee
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station (nuclear), owned by an Entergy subsidiary in the Entergy Wholesale Commodities business segment, which ceased power production in December 2014
Waterford 3
Unit No. 3 (nuclear) of the Waterford Steam Electric Station, 100% owned or leased by Entergy Louisiana
weather-adjusted usage
Electric usage excluding the effects of deviations from normal weather
White Bluff
White Bluff Steam Electric Generating Station, 57% owned by Entergy Arkansas
vi
Table of Contents
ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Entergy operates primarily through two business segments: Utility and Entergy Wholesale Commodities.
•
The
Utility
business segment includes the generation, transmission, distribution, and sale of electric power in portions of Arkansas, Mississippi, Texas, and Louisiana, including the City of New Orleans; and operation of a small natural gas distribution business.
•
The
Entergy Wholesale Commodities
business segment includes the ownership, operation, and decommissioning of nuclear power plants located in the northern United States and the sale of the electric power produced by its operating plants to wholesale customers. Entergy Wholesale Commodities also provides services to other nuclear power plant owners and owns interests in non-nuclear power plants that sell the electric power produced by those plants to wholesale customers.
Results of Operations
Second Quarter
2015
Compared to
Second Quarter
2014
Following are income statement variances for Utility, Entergy Wholesale Commodities, Parent & Other, and Entergy comparing the
second quarter
2015
to the
second quarter
2014
showing how much the line item increased or (decreased) in comparison to the prior period:
Utility
Entergy
Wholesale
Commodities
Parent &
Other (a)
Entergy
(In Thousands)
2nd Quarter 2014 Consolidated Net Income (Loss)
$212,134
$26,463
($44,316
)
$194,281
Net revenue (operating revenue less fuel expense, purchased power, and other regulatory charges/credits)
70,002
(120,622
)
(745
)
(51,365
)
Other operation and maintenance
55,441
(47,189
)
4,678
12,930
Asset write-off, impairments, and related charges
—
(1,667
)
—
(1,667
)
Taxes other than income taxes
2,232
1,676
(266
)
3,642
Depreciation and amortization
16,170
(7,100
)
(458
)
8,612
Other income
2,882
12,856
(4,160
)
11,578
Interest expense
6,873
2,560
(5,428
)
4,005
Other expenses
5,353
(3,141
)
—
2,212
Income taxes
(5,086
)
(22,897
)
(979
)
(28,962
)
2nd Quarter 2015 Consolidated Net Income (Loss)
$204,035
($3,545
)
($46,768
)
$153,722
(a)
Parent & Other includes eliminations, which are primarily intersegment activity.
Refer to “
ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES -
SELECTED OPERATING RESULTS
” for further information with respect to operating statistics.
1
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Net Revenue
Utility
Following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing the
second quarter
2015
to the
second quarter
2014
:
Amount
(In Millions)
2014 net revenue
$1,418
Retail electric price
44
Volume/weather
31
Other
(5
)
2015 net revenue
$1,488
The retail electric price variance is primarily due to:
•
formula rate plan increases at Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana, as approved by the LPSC, effective December 2014 and January 2015;
•
an annual net rate increase at Entergy Mississippi of $16 million, effective February 2015, as a result of the MPSC order in the June 2014 rate case; and
•
an increase in energy efficiency rider revenue primarily due to an increase in the energy efficiency rider at Entergy Arkansas, as approved by the APSC, effective July 2014 and new energy efficiency riders at Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, and Entergy Mississippi that began in the fourth quarter 2014. Energy efficiency revenues are largely offset by costs included in other operation and maintenance expenses and have a minimal effect on net income.
See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for a discussion of rate proceedings.
The volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of weather on residential and commercial sales and an increase in unbilled sales volume, partially offset by a decrease in industrial usage. The decrease in industrial usage is primarily due to extended seasonal outages for existing large refinery customers, partially offset by new customers and expansion projects primarily in the chemicals industry. See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
Critical Accounting Estimates
- Unbilled Revenue
” in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues.
Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing the
second quarter
2015
to the
second quarter
2014
:
Amount
(In Millions)
2014 net revenue
$471
Vermont Yankee shutdown in December 2014
(55
)
Nuclear realized price changes
(48
)
Nuclear volume, excluding Vermont Yankee
(25
)
Other
7
2015 net revenue
$350
2
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
As shown in the table above, net revenue for Entergy Wholesale Commodities decreased by $121 million in the
second quarter
2015
compared to the
second quarter
2014
primarily due to:
•
a decrease in net revenue as a result of Vermont Yankee ceasing power production in December 2014;
•
lower realized wholesale energy prices and lower capacity prices; and
•
lower volume in the Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear fleet resulting from more refueling and unplanned outage days in the second quarter 2015 as compared to the second quarter 2014.
Following are key performance measures for Entergy Wholesale Commodities for the
second quarter
2015
and
2014
:
2015
2014
Owned capacity (MW) (a)
5,463
6,068
GWh billed
9,578
11,533
Average revenue per MWh
$45.87
$49.75
Entergy Wholesale Commodities Nuclear Fleet
Capacity factor
89%
95%
GWh billed
8,555
10,588
Average revenue per MWh
$45.84
$49.79
Refueling Outage Days:
Pilgrim
34
—
(a)
The reduction in owned capacity is due to the retirement of the 605 MW Vermont Yankee plant in December 2014.
Revenue per MWh for Entergy Wholesale Commodities Nuclear Plants
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –
Results of Operations
-
Realized Revenue per MWh for Entergy Wholesale Commodities Nuclear Plants
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the effects of sustained low natural gas prices and power market structure challenges on market prices for electricity in the New York and New England power regions over the past few years. As shown in the contracted sale of energy table in “
Market and Credit Risk Sensitive Instruments
,” Entergy Wholesale Commodities has sold forward 88% of its planned nuclear energy output for the second half of 2015 for an expected average contracted energy price of $44 per MWh based on market prices at June 30, 2015. In addition, Entergy Wholesale Commodities has sold forward 81% of its planned nuclear energy output for 2016 for an expected average contracted energy price of $47 per MWh based on market prices at June 30, 2015.
The market price trend presents a challenging economic situation for the Entergy Wholesale Commodities plants. The challenge is greater for some of these plants based on a variety of factors such as their market for both energy and capacity, their size, their contracted positions, and the amount of investment required to continue to operate and maintain the safety and integrity of the plants, including the estimated asset retirement costs. In addition, currently the market structure in which the plants operate does not adequately compensate merchant nuclear plants for their environmental and fuel diversity benefits in the region. If, in the future, economic conditions or regulatory activity no longer support the continued operation or recovery of the costs of a plant it could adversely affect Entergy’s results of operations through loss of revenue, impairment charges, increased depreciation rates, transitional costs, or accelerated decommissioning costs.
Impairment of long-lived assets and nuclear decommissioning costs, and the factors that influence these items, are both discussed in the Form 10-K in “
Critical Accounting Estimates
.”
3
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Other Income Statement Items
Utility
Other operation and maintenance expenses increased from $556 million for the
second quarter
2014
to $612 million for the
second quarter
2015
primarily due to:
•
an increase of $27 million in nuclear generation expenses primarily due to higher labor costs, including contract labor, and an increase in regulatory compliance costs. The increase in regulatory compliance costs is primarily related to additional NRC inspection activities in second quarter 2015 as a result of the NRC’s March 2015 decision to move ANO into the “multiple/repetitive degraded cornerstone column” of the NRC’s reactor oversight process action matrix. See “
ANO Damage, Outage, and NRC Reviews
” below and in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the ANO stator incident and subsequent NRC reviews;
•
an increase of $9 million in transmission expenses primarily due to an increase in the amount of transmission costs allocated by MISO. The net income effect is partially offset due to the method of recovery of these costs in certain jurisdictions. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further information on the recovery of these costs;
•
an increase of $9 million in distribution expenses primarily due to vegetation maintenance;
•
an increase of $8 million in energy efficiency costs. These costs are recovered through energy efficiency riders and have a minimal effect on net income;
•
an increase of $6 million in fossil-fueled generation expenses primarily due to an increase in scope of work during second quarter 2015 compared to second quarter 2014; and
•
an increase of $5 million due to the timing of annual Nuclear Electric Insurance Limited distributions received in 2015 as compared to 2014.
The increase was partially offset by a decrease of $7 million related to incentives recognized as a result of participation in energy efficiency programs and a decrease of $5 million in storm damage accruals primarily at Entergy Mississippi. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of storm cost recovery.
Depreciation and amortization expenses increased primarily due to additions to plant in service, including the Ninemile Unit 6 project which was placed in service in December 2014.
Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Other operation and maintenance expenses decreased from $259 million for the
second quarter
2014
to $212 million for the
second quarter
2015
primarily due to the shutdown of Vermont Yankee, which ceased power production in December 2014.
Depreciation and amortization expenses decreased primarily due to decreases in depreciable asset balances as a result of the shutdown of Vermont Yankee, which ceased power production in December 2014. See Note 1 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of impairment of long-lived assets.
Other income increased primarily due to realized decommissioning trust gains in the second quarter 2015 that resulted from portfolio reallocations for the Vermont Yankee nuclear decommissioning trust funds.
Income Taxes
The effective income tax rate was 39.4% for the second quarter 2015. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the second quarter 2015 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% was primarily due to state income taxes and certain book and tax differences related to utility plant items, partially offset by book and tax differences related to the allowance for equity funds used during construction.
4
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
The effective income tax rate was 39.9% for the second quarter 2014. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the second quarter 2014 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% was primarily due to state income taxes, the provision for uncertain tax positions, and certain book and tax differences related to utility plant items.
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2015
Compared to
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2014
Following are income statement variances for Utility, Entergy Wholesale Commodities, Parent & Other, and Entergy comparing the
six months ended
June 30, 2015
to the
six months ended
June 30, 2014
showing how much the line item increased or (decreased) in comparison to the prior period:
Utility
Entergy
Wholesale
Commodities
Parent &
Other (a)
Entergy
(In Thousands)
2014 Consolidated Net Income (Loss)
$417,574
$268,933
($86,173
)
$600,334
Net revenue (operating revenue less fuel expense, purchased power, and other regulatory charges/credits)
143,119
(342,060
)
(1,659
)
(200,600
)
Other operation and maintenance
113,630
(67,486
)
1,186
47,330
Asset write-off, impairments, and related charges
—
(3,937
)
—
(3,937
)
Taxes other than income taxes
12,430
(5,944
)
211
6,697
Depreciation and amortization
27,903
(14,984
)
(1,044
)
11,875
Other income
17,222
35,797
(9,263
)
43,756
Interest expense
12,731
3,414
(7,451
)
8,694
Other expenses
8,334
3,303
—
11,637
Income taxes
(28,899
)
(71,583
)
5,025
(95,457
)
2015 Consolidated Net Income (Loss)
$431,786
$119,887
($95,022
)
$456,651
(a)
Parent & Other includes eliminations, which are primarily intersegment activity.
Refer to “
ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES -
SELECTED OPERATING RESULTS
” for further information with respect to operating statistics.
Net Revenue
Utility
Following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing the
six months ended
June 30, 2015
to the
six months ended
June 30, 2014
:
Amount
(In Millions)
2014 net revenue
$2,755
Retail electric price
112
Volume/weather
40
MISO deferral
(19
)
Other
10
2015 net revenue
$2,898
5
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
The retail electric price variance is primarily due to:
•
formula rate plan increases at Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana, as approved by the LPSC, effective December 2014 and January 2015;
•
an annual net rate increase at Entergy Mississippi of $16 million, effective February 2015, as a result of the MPSC order in the June 2014 rate case; and
•
an increase in energy efficiency rider revenue primarily due to an increase in the energy efficiency rider at Entergy Arkansas, as approved by the APSC, effective July 2014 and new energy efficiency riders at Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, and Entergy Mississippi that began in the fourth quarter 2014. Energy efficiency revenues are largely offset by costs included in other operation and maintenance expenses and have a minimal effect on net income.
See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for a discussion of rate proceedings.
The volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase in unbilled sales volume and an increase in industrial usage. The increase in industrial usage is primarily due to new customers and expansion projects primarily in the chemicals industry, partially offset by extended seasonal outages for existing large refinery customers and in the industrial gases industry. See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
Critical Accounting Estimates
- Unbilled Revenue
” in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues.
The MISO deferral variance is primarily due to the deferral in 2014 of non-fuel MISO-related charges, as approved by the LPSC and the MPSC. The deferral of non-fuel MISO-related charges is partially offset in other operation and maintenance expenses. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the recovery of non-fuel MISO-related charges.
Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing the
six months ended
June 30, 2015
to the
six months ended
June 30, 2014
:
Amount
(In Millions)
2014 net revenue
$1,219
Vermont Yankee shutdown in December 2014
(209
)
Nuclear realized price changes
(147
)
Mark-to-market, excluding Vermont Yankee
(52
)
Nuclear volume, excluding Vermont Yankee
42
Other
24
2015 net revenue
$877
As shown in the table above, net revenue for Entergy Wholesale Commodities decreased by $342 million in the
six months ended
June 30, 2015
compared to the
six months ended
June 30, 2014
primarily due to:
•
a decrease in net revenue as a result of Vermont Yankee ceasing power production in December 2014;
•
lower realized wholesale energy prices and lower capacity prices; and
•
mark-to-market activity, which was negative for the six months ended June 30, 2015. In the fourth quarter 2014, Entergy Wholesale Commodities entered into electricity derivative instruments that were not designated as hedges, including additional financial power sales to lock in margins on some in-the-money purchased call options. When these positions settled, the turnaround of the positive year-end 2014 mark contributed to the negative mark-to-market variance for the six months ended June 30, 2015. In the fourth quarter 2013, Entergy
6
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Wholesale Commodities also entered into similar transactions. The effect of increases in forward prices resulted in negative mark-to-market activity in fourth quarter 2013. The turnaround of the negative year-end 2013 mark resulted in a positive mark in the six months ended June 30, 2014, which also contributed to the negative mark-to-market variance for the six months ended June 30, 2015. See Note 16 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K and Note 8 to the financial statements herein for discussion of derivative instruments.
The decrease was partially offset by higher volume in the Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear fleet resulting from fewer refueling outage days in the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2014 and larger exercise of resupply options in the six months ended June 30, 2014 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2015, partially offset by more unplanned outage days in the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2014.
Following are key performance measures for Entergy Wholesale Commodities for the
six months ended
June 30, 2015
and
2014
:
2015
2014
Owned capacity (MW) (a)
5,463
6,068
GWh billed
19,170
21,547
Average revenue per MWh
$56.44
$68.77
Entergy Wholesale Commodities Nuclear Fleet
Capacity factor
89%
89%
GWh billed
17,173
19,667
Average revenue per MWh
$55.85
$67.83
Refueling Outage Days:
Indian Point 2
—
24
Indian Point 3
23
—
Palisades
—
56
Pilgrim
34
—
(a)
The reduction in owned capacity is due to the retirement of the 605 MW Vermont Yankee plant in December 2014.
Other Income Statement Items
Utility
Other operation and maintenance expenses increased from $1,054 million for the
six months ended
June 30, 2014
to $1,167 million for the
six months ended
June 30, 2015
primarily due to:
•
an increase of $39 million in nuclear generation expenses primarily due to an increase in regulatory compliance costs, higher labor costs, including contract labor, and an overall higher scope of work done in 2015 as compared to the same period in 2014. The increase in regulatory compliance costs is primarily related to additional NRC inspection activities in 2015 as a result of the NRC’s March 2015 decision to move ANO into the “multiple/repetitive degraded cornerstone column” of the NRC’s reactor oversight process action matrix. See “
ANO Damage, Outage, and NRC Reviews
” below and in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the ANO stator incident and subsequent NRC reviews;
•
an increase of $23 million in fossil-fueled generation expenses primarily due to an overall higher scope of work done in 2015 as compared to the same period in 2014 and higher long-term service agreement costs as a result of increased operation of certain plants;
7
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
•
an increase of $16 million in transmission expenses primarily due to an increase in the amount of transmission costs allocated by MISO. The net income effect is partially offset due to the method of recovery of these costs in certain jurisdictions. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further information on the recovery of these costs;
•
an increase of $15 million in energy efficiency costs, including the effects of true-ups to the energy efficiency filings for fixed costs to be collected from customers. These costs are recovered through energy efficiency riders and have a minimal effect on net income; and
•
an increase of $12 million in distribution expenses primarily due to vegetation maintenance.
Taxes other than income taxes increased primarily due to increases in payroll taxes and ad valorem taxes.
Depreciation and amortization expenses increased primarily due to additions to plant in service, including the Ninemile Unit 6 project which was placed in service in December 2014.
Other income increased primarily due to:
•
an increase in realized gains on decommissioning trust fund investments in the six months ended June 30, 2015 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2014. There is no effect on net income as the trust fund realized gains are offset by a corresponding amount of regulatory charges; and
•
an increase in income earned on preferred membership interests purchased from Entergy Holdings Company with the proceeds received in August 2014 from the Act 55 storm cost financing. The distributions on preferred membership interests are eliminated in consolidation and have no effect on Entergy’s net income because the investment is in another Entergy subsidiary. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the Act 55 storm cost financing.
The increase was partially offset by a decrease in allowance for equity funds used during construction due to a higher construction work in progress balance in 2014, which included the Ninemile Unit 6 project which was placed in service in December 2014.
Interest expense increased primarily due to net debt issuances in the fourth quarter 2014 by certain Utility operating companies including the issuance by Entergy Louisiana in November 2014 of $250 million of 4.95% Series first mortgage bonds due January 2045 and the issuance by Entergy Arkansas in December 2014 of $250 million of 4.95% Series first mortgage bonds due December 2044.
Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Other operation and maintenance expenses decreased from $492 million for the
six months ended
June 30, 2014
to $425 million for the
six months ended
June 30, 2015
primarily due to the shutdown of Vermont Yankee, which ceased power production in December 2014. The decrease was partially offset by lower deferral of costs for future amortization as a result of fewer refueling outage days.
Depreciation and amortization expenses decreased primarily due to decreases in depreciable asset balances as a result of the shutdown of Vermont Yankee, which ceased power production in December 2014. See Note 1 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of impairment of long-lived assets.
Other income increased primarily due to higher realized gains on decommissioning trust fund investments in 2015 as compared to 2014, including portfolio reallocations for the Vermont Yankee nuclear decommissioning trust funds.
8
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Income Taxes
The effective income tax rate was 35.4% for the six months ended June 30, 2015. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2015 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% was primarily due to state income taxes and certain book and tax differences related to utility plant items, partially offset by the reversal of a portion of the provision for uncertain tax positions resulting from the receipt of finalized tax and interest computations for the 2006-2007 audit from the IRS and book and tax differences related to the allowance for equity funds used during construction. See Note 10 to the financial statements for a discussion of the finalized tax and interest computations for the 2006-2007 IRS audit.
The effective income tax rate was 36.5% for the six months ended June 30, 2014. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2014 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% was primarily due to the provision for uncertain tax positions and certain book and tax differences related to utility plant items, partially offset by book and tax differences related to the allowance for equity funds used during construction and from a deferred state income tax reduction related to a New York tax law change. See Note 3 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the New York tax law change.
Entergy Wholesale Commodities Authorizations to Operate Its Nuclear Power Plants
See the Form 10-K for a discussion of the NRC operating licenses for Indian Point 2 and Indian Point 3 and the NRC license renewal joint application in process for these plants. Following are updates to the discussion regarding the NRC and related proceedings.
In March 2015 the NRC resolved the remaining appeals from the ASLB’s Track 1 decisions in favor of Entergy and NRC staff. Those appeals addressed electrical transformers and environmental justice. All filings in response to the NRC’s request for additional information on Severe Accident Mitigation Alternatives (SAMA) issues raised by the pending two SAMA-related appeals have been completed. There is no deadline for the NRC to act on the SAMA-related appeals.
In March 2015 the ASLB granted New York State’s motions to amend and update two of the remaining three previously-admitted Track 2 contentions. The ASLB scheduled Track 2 hearings for November 2015.
As discussed in the Form 10-K, independent of the ASLB process, the NRC staff has performed its technical and environmental reviews of the Indian Point 2 and Indian Point 3 license renewal application. In June 2015 the NRC staff advised the ASLB that the schedule for issuance of a further Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (FSEIS) supplement to address new information would be postponed by six months. Under the updated schedule, the new final FSEIS supplement is expected to be issued in September 2016.
In March 2015 the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) staff withdrew from consideration at trial before the ALJs its proposal for annual fish protection outages of 92 days. NYSDEC staff and Riverkeeper continue to advance other annual outage proposals. NYSDEC staff also withdrew from further consideration a $24 million annual interim payment that had been proposed as a condition of the draft water pollution control permit.
In March 2015, New York State Department of State’s (NYSDOS) motion for reargument or, alternatively, for leave to appeal the December 2014 Coastal Zone Management Act grandfathering decision to the New York State Court of Appeals was denied by the Appellate Division. In April 2015, as permitted by New York rules, NYSDOS filed a separate motion directly with the State Court of Appeals requesting leave to appeal that decision. The State Court of Appeals granted NYSDOS’s motion for leave to appeal in June 2015 and scheduled briefing on the appeal through January 2016.
9
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
In June 2015, Entergy and NYSDOS executed an agreement extending their agreement intended to preserve the parties’ respective positions on the effectiveness of Entergy’s November 2014 notice withdrawing the Indian Point consistency certification. Under the extension agreement, if NYSDOS is correct that withdrawal was not effective, the parties will be deemed to have agreed to a stay until September 28, 2015, thus making the deemed deadline for decision on the 2012 consistency certification October 5, 2015.
ANO Damage, Outage, and NRC Reviews
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
ANO Damage, Outage, and NRC Reviews
”
in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the ANO stator incident and subsequent NRC reviews.
As discussed in the Form 10-K, in January 2015 the NRC issued its final risk significance determination for the flood barrier violation originally cited in the September 2014 report. The NRC’s final risk significance determination was classified as “yellow with substantial safety significance.” In March 2015 the NRC issued a letter notifying Entergy of its decision to move ANO into the “multiple/repetitive degraded cornerstone column” of the NRC’s reactor oversight process action matrix. Placement into this column will require significant additional NRC inspection activities at the ANO site, including a review of the site’s root cause evaluation associated with the flood barrier and stator issues, an assessment of the effectiveness of the site’s corrective action program, an additional design basis inspection, a safety culture assessment, and possibly other inspection activities consistent with the NRC’s Inspection Procedure. Excluding remediation and response costs that may result from the additional NRC inspection activities, Entergy Arkansas expects to incur incremental costs of approximately $50 million in 2015, of which $18 million has been incurred as of June 30, 2015, and approximately $35 million in 2016 to prepare for the NRC inspection expected to occur in early 2016.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
Liquidity and Capital Resources
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy’s capital structure, capital expenditure plans and other uses of capital, and sources of capital. Following are updates to that discussion.
Capital Structure
Entergy’s capitalization is balanced between equity and debt, as shown in the following table.
June 30, 2015
December 31,
2014
Debt to capital
57.0
%
57.6
%
Effect of excluding the securitization bonds
(1.4
%)
(1.4
%)
Debt to capital, excluding securitization bonds (a)
55.6
%
56.2
%
Effect of subtracting cash
(1.7
%)
(2.8
%)
Net debt to net capital, excluding securitization bonds (a)
53.9
%
53.4
%
(a)
Calculation excludes the Arkansas, Louisiana, and Texas securitization bonds, which are non-recourse to Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, and Entergy Texas, respectively.
Net debt consists of debt less cash and cash equivalents. Debt consists of notes payable and commercial paper, capital lease obligations, and long-term debt, including the currently maturing portion. Capital consists of debt, common shareholders’ equity, and subsidiaries’ preferred stock without sinking fund. Net capital consists of capital less cash and cash equivalents. Entergy uses the debt to capital ratios excluding securitization bonds in analyzing its financial condition and believes they provide useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating Entergy’s financial condition because the securitization bonds are non-recourse to Entergy, as more fully described in Note 5 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K. Entergy also uses the net debt to net capital ratio excluding securitization bonds in analyzing its financial condition and believes it provides useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating
10
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Entergy’s financial condition because net debt indicates Entergy’s outstanding debt position that could not be readily satisfied by cash and cash equivalents on hand.
Entergy Corporation has in place a credit facility that has a borrowing capacity of $3.5 billion and expires in March 2019. Entergy Corporation also has the ability to issue letters of credit against 50% of the total borrowing capacity of the credit facility. The commitment fee is currently 0.275% of the undrawn commitment amount. Commitment fees and interest rates on loans under the credit facility can fluctuate depending on the senior unsecured debt ratings of Entergy Corporation. The weighted average interest rate for the
six months ended June 30, 2015
was
1.94%
on the drawn portion of the facility. Following is a summary of the borrowings outstanding and capacity available under the facility as of
June 30, 2015
:
Capacity
Borrowings
Letters
of Credit
Capacity
Available
(In Millions)
$3,500
$271
$9
$3,220
A covenant in Entergy Corporation’s credit facility requires Entergy to maintain a consolidated debt ratio of 65% or less of its total capitalization. The calculation of this debt ratio under Entergy Corporation’s credit facility is different than the calculation of the debt to capital ratio above. Entergy is currently in compliance with the covenant. If Entergy fails to meet this ratio, or if Entergy or one of the Utility operating companies (except Entergy New Orleans) defaults on other indebtedness or is in bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings, an acceleration of the facility’s maturity date may occur. See Note 4 to the financial statements herein for additional discussion of the Entergy Corporation credit facility and discussion of the Registrant Subsidiaries’ credit facilities.
In January 2015, Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee entered into a credit facility with a borrowing capacity of $60 million and an uncommitted credit facility with a borrowing capacity of $85 million. Both facilities are guaranteed by Entergy Corporation and will expire in January 2018. As of
June 30, 2015
, no amounts were outstanding under these facilities. See Note 4 to the financial statements herein for additional discussion of these facilities.
Entergy Corporation has a commercial paper program with a Board-approved program limit of up to $1.5 billion. As of
June 30, 2015
, Entergy Corporation had $895 million of commercial paper outstanding. The weighted-average interest rate for the six months ended June 30, 2015 was 0.89%.
Capital Expenditure Plans and Other Uses of Capital
See the table and discussion in the Form 10-K under “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
Liquidity and Capital Resources
- Capital Expenditure Plans and Other Uses of Capital
,” that sets forth the amounts of planned construction and other capital investments by operating segment for 2015 through 2017. Following are updates to the discussion in the Form 10-K.
Union Power Station Purchase Agreement
As discussed in the Form 10-K, in December 2014, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, and Entergy Texas entered into an asset purchase agreement to acquire the Union Power Station. The Union Power Station is a 1,980 MW (summer rating) power generation facility that consists of four power blocks, each rated at 495 MW. The purchase of the Union Power Station is contingent upon, among other things, obtaining necessary approvals, including cost recovery, from various federal and state regulatory and permitting agencies.
In December 2014, Entergy Texas filed its application for Certificate of Convenience and Necessity (CCN) with the PUCT seeking one of the two necessary PUCT approvals of the acquisition. In April 2015 intervenors, the Office of Public Utility Counsel, the Texas Industrial Energy Consumers, and the East Texas Electric Cooperative each
11
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
filed testimony opposing the transaction. In May 2015, PUCT staff filed testimony opposing the transaction. The PUCT held a hearing in June 2015 on Entergy Texas’s CCN application, resulting in a PUCT request for additional testimony, which Entergy Texas and intervenors filed in June and July 2015. In a separate proceeding initiated in June 2015, Entergy Texas filed a rate application to seek cost recovery of its power block acquisition costs and other costs. In July 2015 the PUCT requested briefing on legal and policy issues related to post-test year adjustments and other rate-recovery issues in Entergy Texas’s base rate case. Based on the opposition to the acquisition of the power block, Entergy Texas determined it was appropriate to seek to dismiss the CCN filing and withdraw the rate case. In July 2015, Entergy Texas withdrew the rate case and, together with other parties, filed a motion with the PUCT to dismiss Entergy Texas’s CCN application. On July 30, 2015, the PUCT granted the motion to dismiss the CCN case. The power block originally allocated to Entergy Texas will be acquired by Entergy New Orleans, subject to City Council approval and the satisfaction of other conditions to close the transaction. The acquisition by Entergy New Orleans would replace the power purchase agreement with Entergy Gulf States Louisiana that the City Council approved in June 2015. Entergy New Orleans will file an application for authorization to proceed with the acquisition and plans to seek City Council resolution by a date that would support closing the transaction by the end of 2015.
In January 2015, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana filed its application with the LPSC for approval of the acquisition and cost recovery. In May 2015 the LPSC staff and intervenors filed testimony. The LPSC staff supports the transaction. In June 2015, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana filed rebuttal testimony. Supplemental testimony was submitted in July 2015 explaining the reallocation of one of the power blocks to Entergy New Orleans. A hearing is scheduled in September 2015 with a decision expected in fourth quarter 2015.
In January 2015, Entergy Arkansas filed its application with the APSC for approval of the acquisition and cost recovery. The APSC staff and the Arkansas Attorney General filed testimony stating that the acquisition is in the public interest. Only one party intervened opposing the acquisition. In July 2015, Entergy Arkansas filed rebuttal testimony. A hearing is scheduled in September 2015 with a decision expected in November 2015.
In February 2015, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, and Entergy Texas filed a notification and report form pursuant to the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act (HSR Act) with the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) and Federal Trade Commission with respect to their planned acquisition of the Union Power Station. Union Power Partners, L.P. (UPP), the seller, also filed a notification and report form in February 2015. In March 2015 the DOJ requested additional information and documentary material from each of the purchasing companies and UPP. Also in March 2015, UPP, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, and Entergy Texas filed an application with the FERC requesting authorization for the transaction. In April 2015, Entergy Texas and Entergy Gulf States Louisiana made a filing with the FERC to request authorization to recover their portions of the expected positive acquisition adjustment associated with the acquisition of the Union Power Station. Also in April 2015, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, and Entergy Texas made a filing with the FERC for approval of their proposed accounting treatment of the amortization expenses relating to the acquisition adjustment. Closing is targeted to occur in late-2015.
Dividends
Declarations of dividends on Entergy’s common stock are made at the discretion of the Board. Among other things, the Board evaluates the level of Entergy’s common stock dividends based upon Entergy’s earnings, financial strength, and future investment opportunities. At its July 2015 meeting, the Board declared a dividend of $0.83 per share, which is the same quarterly dividend per share that Entergy has paid since the second quarter 2010.
Sources of Capital
In July 2015, Entergy Corporation issued $650 million of 4.0% Series senior notes due July 2022. Entergy Corporation will use the proceeds to pay, at maturity, its $550 million of 3.625% Series senior notes due September 2015, to repay a portion of its commercial paper outstanding, and to repay borrowings under the Entergy Corporation credit facility.
12
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Hurricane Isaac
See the Form 10-K for a discussion of damages caused by Hurricane Isaac in August 2012. In May 2015, the City Council issued a financing order authorizing the issuance of securitization bonds to recover Entergy New Orleans’s Hurricane Isaac storm restoration costs of $31.8 million, including carrying costs, the costs of funding and replenishing the storm recovery reserve in the amount of $63.9 million, and approximately $3 million for estimated up-front financing costs associated with the securitization. See Note 4 to the financial statements herein for a discussion of the July 2015 issuance of the securitization bonds.
Cash Flow Activity
As shown in Entergy’s Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, cash flows for the
six months ended
June 30, 2015
and
2014
were as follows:
2015
2014
(In Millions)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
$1,422
$739
Cash flow provided by (used in):
Operating activities
1,338
1,529
Investing activities
(1,370
)
(1,391
)
Financing activities
(480
)
(227
)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
(512
)
(89
)
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$910
$650
Operating Activities
Net cash flow provided by operating activities decreased $191 million for the
six months ended
June 30, 2015
compared to the
six months ended
June 30, 2014
primarily due to:
•
lower Entergy Wholesale Commodities net revenues in 2015 as compared to the same period in 2014, as discussed previously;
•
an increase in income tax payments of $71 million primarily due to payments made in 2015 for the final settlement of amounts outstanding associated with the 2006-2007 IRS audit. See Note 10 to the financial statements for a discussion of the finalized tax and interest computations for the 2006-2007 IRS audit;
•
an increase in spending of $50 million in 2015 related to Vermont Yankee, including severance and retention payments accrued in 2014 and defueling activities that took place after the plant ceased power production in December 2014;
•
an increase of $28 million in interest paid in 2015 compared to the same period in 2014 primarily due to an increase in interest paid on the Grand Gulf sale-leaseback obligation. See Note 10 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for details of the Grand Gulf sale-leaseback obligation; and
•
an increase of $26 million in pension contributions in 2015. See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –
Critical Accounting Estimates
–
Qualified Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits
” in the Form 10-K and Note 6 to the financial statements herein for a discussion of qualified pension and other postretirement benefits funding.
The decrease was partially offset by:
•
increased recovery of fuel costs in 2015 as compared to the same period in 2014;
•
higher Utility net revenues in 2015 as compared to the same period in 2014, as discussed above;
13
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
•
a decrease of $32 million in storm restoration spending in 2015 as compared to the same period in 2014; and
•
a decrease of $24 million in spending on nuclear refueling outages in 2015 as compared to the same period in 2014.
Investing Activities
Net cash flow used in investing activities decreased $21 million for the
six months ended
June 30, 2015
compared to the
six months ended
June 30, 2014
primarily due to:
•
deposit of Entergy Louisiana bond proceeds with a trustee in June 2014. Entergy Louisiana issued $170 million of 5.0% Series first mortgage bonds in June 2014 and used the proceeds, in July 2014, to redeem, prior to maturity, its $70 million of 6.4% Series first mortgage bonds due October 2034 and its $100 million of 6.3% Series first mortgage bonds due September 2035;
•
a decrease in nuclear fuel purchases due to variations from year to year in the timing and pricing of fuel reload requirements, material and services deliveries, and the timing of cash payments during the nuclear fuel cycle; and
•
disbursements from the Vermont Yankee decommissioning trust funds.
The decrease was partially offset by:
•
an increase in construction expenditures primarily due to an overall higher scope of work on various projects, compliance with NRC post-Fukushima requirements, and a higher scope of work during plant outages in 2015 as compared to the same period in 2014, partially offset by a decrease in storm restoration spending and a decrease in spending on the Ninemile Unit 6 self-build project;
•
a change in collateral deposit activity, reflected in the “Increase in other investments” line on the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows, as certain Utility operating companies posted cash collateral of $54 million to support their obligations to MISO and Entergy Wholesale Commodities received net deposits of $28 million in 2014. Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ forward sales contracts are discussed in the “
Market and Credit Risk Sensitive Instruments
” section below;
•
a decrease of $15 million in insurance proceeds primarily due to $13 million received in the first quarter 2015 related to the Baxter Wilson plant event and $24 million received in the first quarter 2014 for property damages related to the generator stator incident at ANO. See Note 1 to the financial statements herein and Note 8 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the Baxter Wilson plant event and the ANO stator incident; and
•
proceeds from the sale of aircraft in first quarter 2014.
Financing Activities
Net cash flow used in financing activities increased $253 million for the
six months ended
June 30, 2015
compared to the
six months ended
June 30, 2014
primarily due to:
•
long-term debt activity using approximately $519 million of cash in 2015 compared to providing $7 million of cash in 2014. Included in the long-term debt activity is $424 million in 2015 and $60 million in 2014 for the repayment of borrowings on the Entergy Corporation long-term credit facility;
•
a net decrease of $199 million in 2015 in short-term borrowings by the nuclear fuel company variable interest entities; and
•
a decrease of $57 million in treasury stock issuances in 2015 primarily due to a larger amount of previously repurchased Entergy Corporation stock issued in 2014 to satisfy stock option exercises.
14
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
The increase was partially offset by net issuances of $411 million of commercial paper in 2015 compared to net repayments of $136 million of commercial paper in 2014.
For details of long-term debt activity and Entergy’s commercial paper program in 2015, see Note 4 to the financial statements herein and Note 5 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K.
Rate, Cost-recovery, and Other Regulation
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
Rate, Cost-recovery, and Other Regulation
” in the Form 10-K for discussions of rate regulation, federal regulation, and related regulatory proceedings.
State and Local Rate Regulation and Fuel-Cost Recovery
See Note 2 to the financial statements herein for updates to the discussion in the Form 10-K regarding these proceedings.
Federal Regulation
See the Form 10-K for a discussion of federal regulatory proceedings.
Entergy’s Integration Into the MISO Regional Transmission Organization
See the Form 10-K for a discussion of pending FERC proceedings regarding Entergy’s integration into the MISO RTO. The following is an update to that discussion.
In May 2015, several parties filed a complaint against MISO related to certain charges for transmission service provided by MISO to them when their point-to-point service under the Entergy open access transmission tariff was transitioned to the MISO tariff in December 2013. The complainants request that the FERC order refunds for alleged overcharges since December 2013, or alternatively that the FERC institute a proceeding under Section 206 of the Federal Power Act to address the legality of transmission applicable rates and establish a different fifteen-month refund period from the period established in the FERC’s February 2014 order. In June 2015, another party filed a similar complaint against MISO. MISO filed answers to both complaints asking the FERC to dismiss the complaints and Entergy filed protests in support of MISO’s answers. Also in June 2015, the FERC issued an order denying rehearing of certain determinations in the February 2014 order regarding MISO’s regional through and out rates.
Market and Credit Risk Sensitive Instruments
Commodity Price Risk
Power Generation
As a wholesale generator, Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ core business is selling energy, measured in MWh, to its customers. Entergy Wholesale Commodities enters into forward contracts with its customers and also sells energy in the day ahead or spot markets. In addition to selling the energy produced by its plants, Entergy Wholesale Commodities sells unforced capacity, which allows load-serving entities to meet specified reserve and related requirements placed on them by the ISOs in their respective areas. Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ forward physical power contracts consist of contracts to sell energy only, contracts to sell capacity only, and bundled contracts in which it sells both capacity and energy. While the terminology and payment mechanics vary in these contracts, each of these types of contracts requires Entergy Wholesale Commodities to deliver MWh of energy, make capacity available, or both. In addition to its forward physical power contracts, Entergy Wholesale Commodities also uses a combination of financial contracts, including swaps, collars, and options, to manage forward commodity price risk. Certain hedge volumes have price downside and upside relative to market price movement. The contracted minimum, expected value,
15
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
and sensitivities are provided in the table below to show potential variations. The sensitivities may not reflect the total maximum upside potential from higher market prices. The information contained in the following table represents projections at a point in time and will vary over time based on numerous factors, such as future market prices, contracting activities, and generation. Following is a summary of Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ current forward capacity and generation contracts as well as total revenue projections based on market prices as of
June 30, 2015
(
2015
represents the remainder of the year):
Entergy Wholesale Commodities Nuclear Portfolio
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Energy
Percent of planned generation under contract (a):
Unit-contingent (b)
41%
32%
14%
14%
16%
Unit-contingent with availability guarantees (c)
22%
17%
18%
3%
3%
Firm LD (d)
43%
32%
7%
—%
—%
Offsetting positions (e)
(18%)
—%
—%
—%
—%
Total
88%
81%
39%
17%
19%
Planned generation (TWh) (f) (g)
18
36
35
35
36
Average revenue per MWh on contracted volumes:
Minimum
$43
$45
$48
$56
$57
Expected based on market prices as of June 30, 2015
$44
$47
$50
$56
$57
Sensitivity: -/+ $10 per MWh market price change
$43-$45
$46-$48
$49-$52
$56
$57
Capacity
Percent of capacity sold forward (h):
Bundled capacity and energy contracts (i)
17%
17%
18%
18%
18%
Capacity contracts (j)
45%
16%
16%
16%
7%
Total
62%
33%
34%
34%
25%
Planned net MW in operation (g)
4,406
4,406
4,406
4,406
4,406
Average revenue under contract per kW per month
(applies to capacity contracts only)
$5.8
$3.4
$5.6
$9.4
$11.1
Total Nuclear Energy and Capacity Revenues
Expected sold and market total revenue per MWh
$48
$49
$48
$49
$51
Sensitivity: -/+ $10 per MWh market price change
$47-$51
$46-$52
$42-$55
$41-$57
$43-$59
16
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Entergy Wholesale Commodities Non-Nuclear Portfolio
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Energy
Percent of planned generation under contract (a):
Cost-based contracts (k)
34%
36%
34%
34%
34%
Firm LD (d)
17%
7%
7%
7%
7%
Total
51%
43%
41%
41%
41%
Planned generation (TWh) (f) (l)
3
6
6
6
6
Capacity
Percent of capacity sold forward (h):
Cost-based contracts (k)
24%
24%
26%
26%
26%
Bundled capacity and energy contracts (i)
8%
8%
8%
8%
8%
Capacity contracts (j)
53%
53%
57%
57%
24%
Total
85%
85%
91%
91%
58%
Planned net MW in operation (l)
1,052
1,052
977
977
977
(a)
Percent of planned generation output sold or purchased forward under contracts, forward physical contracts, forward financial contracts, or options that mitigate price uncertainty that may require regulatory approval or approval of transmission rights. Positions that are not classified as hedges are netted in the planned generation under contract.
(b)
Transaction under which power is supplied from a specific generation asset; if the asset is not operating, the seller is generally not liable to buyer for any damages.
(c)
A sale of power on a unit-contingent basis coupled with a guarantee of availability provides for the payment to the power purchaser of contract damages, if incurred, in the event the seller fails to deliver power as a result of the failure of the specified generation unit to generate power at or above a specified availability threshold. All of Entergy’s outstanding guarantees of availability provide for dollar limits on Entergy’s maximum liability under such guarantees.
(d)
Transaction that requires receipt or delivery of energy at a specified delivery point (usually at a market hub not associated with a specific asset) or settles financially on notional quantities; if a party fails to deliver or receive energy, defaulting party must compensate the other party as specified in the contract, a portion of which may be capped through the use of risk management products. This also includes option transactions that may expire without being exercised.
(e)
Transactions for the purchase of energy, generally to offset a Firm LD transaction.
(f)
Amount of output expected to be generated by Entergy Wholesale Commodities resources considering plant operating characteristics, outage schedules, and expected market conditions that affect dispatch.
(g)
Assumes NRC license renewals for plants whose current licenses expire within five years, and uninterrupted normal operation at all operating plants. NRC license renewal applications are in process for two units, as follows (with current license expirations in parentheses): Indian Point 2 (September 2013 and now operating under its period of extended operations while its application is pending) and Indian Point 3 (December 2015). For a discussion regarding the license renewals for Indian Point 2 and Indian Point 3, see “
Entergy Wholesale Commodities Authorizations to Operate Its Nuclear Power Plants
” above and in the Form10-K.
(h)
Percent of planned qualified capacity sold to mitigate price uncertainty under physical or financial transactions.
(i)
A contract for the sale of installed capacity and related energy, priced per megawatt-hour sold.
(j)
A contract for the sale of an installed capacity product in a regional market.
(k)
Contracts priced in accordance with cost-based rates, a ratemaking concept used for the design and development of rate schedules to ensure that the filed rate schedules recover only the cost of providing the service; these contracts are on owned non-utility resources located within Entergy’s Utility service area and were executed
17
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
prior to receiving market-based rate authority under MISO. The percentage sold assumes completion of the necessary transmission upgrades required for the approved transmission rights.
(l)
Non-nuclear planned generation and net MW in operation include purchases from affiliated and non-affiliated counterparties under long-term contracts and exclude energy and capacity from Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ wind investment. The decrease in planned net MW in operation beginning in 2017 is due to the expiration of a non-affiliated 75 MW contract.
Entergy estimates that a positive $10 per MWh change in the annual average energy price in the markets in which the Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear business sells power, based on
June 30, 2015
market conditions, planned generation volumes, and hedged positions, would have a corresponding effect on pre-tax net income of $24 million for the remainder of 2015. As of
June 30, 2014
, a positive $10 per MWh change would have had a corresponding effect on pre-tax income of $126 million for the remainder of 2014. A negative $10 per MWh change in the annual average energy price in the markets based on
June 30, 2015
market conditions, planned generation volumes, and hedged positions, would have a corresponding effect on pre-tax net income of ($24) million for the remainder of 2015. As of
June 30, 2014
, a negative $10 per MWh change would have had a corresponding effect on pre-tax income of ($55) million for the remainder of 2014.
Some of the agreements to sell the power produced by Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ power plants contain provisions that require an Entergy subsidiary to provide collateral to secure its obligations under the agreements. The Entergy subsidiary is required to provide collateral based upon the difference between the current market and contracted power prices in the regions where Entergy Wholesale Commodities sells power. The primary form of collateral to satisfy these requirements is an Entergy Corporation guaranty. Cash and letters of credit are also acceptable forms of collateral. At
June 30, 2015
, based on power prices at that time, Entergy had liquidity exposure of $154 million under the guarantees in place supporting Entergy Wholesale Commodities transactions and $12 million of posted cash collateral. In the event of a decrease in Entergy Corporation’s credit rating to below investment grade, based on power prices as of
June 30, 2015
, Entergy would have been required to provide approximately $55 million of additional cash or letters of credit under some of the agreements. As of
June 30, 2015
, the liquidity exposure associated with Entergy Wholesale Commodities assurance requirements, including return of previously posted collateral from counterparties, would increase by $36 million for a $1 per MMBtu increase in gas prices in both the short-and long-term markets.
As of June 30, 2015, credit exposure related to the planned energy output under contract for Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear plants through 2019 is with counterparties or their guarantors that have public investment grade credit ratings.
Nuclear Matters
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –
Nuclear Matters
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of nuclear matters.
Critical Accounting Estimates
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
Critical Accounting Estimates
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the estimates and judgments necessary in Entergy’s accounting for nuclear decommissioning costs, unbilled revenue, impairment of long-lived assets and trust fund investments, qualified pension and other postretirement benefits, and other contingencies. Following are updates to that discussion.
Nuclear Decommissioning Costs
In the second quarter 2015, Entergy Wholesale Commodities recorded a revision to its estimated decommissioning cost liability for a nuclear site as a result of a revised decommissioning cost study. The revised estimate resulted in a $77.6 million reduction in the decommissioning cost liability, along with a corresponding reduction in the related asset retirement cost asset.
18
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
New Accounting Pronouncements
The accounting standard-setting process, including projects between the FASB and the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) to converge U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards, is ongoing and the FASB and the IASB are each currently working on several projects. Final pronouncements that result from these projects could have a material effect on Entergy’s future net income, financial position, or cash flows.
In February 2015 the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-02, “Consolidation (Topic 810): Amendments to Consolidation Analysis” which changes the analysis that a reporting entity must perform to determine whether it should consolidate certain types of legal entities. The ASU affects (1) limited partnerships and similar legal entities, (2) evaluating fees paid to a decision maker or a service provider as a variable interest, (3) the effect of fee arrangements on the primary beneficiary determination, (4) the effect of related parties on the primary beneficiary determination, and (5) certain investment funds. ASU 2015-02 is effective for Entergy for the first quarter 2016. Entergy does not expect ASU 2015-02 to affect materially its results of operations, financial position, or cash flows.
In April 2015 the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03, “Interest-Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs.” The ASU states that debt issuance costs shall be reported in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the associated debt liability. ASU 2015-03 is effective for Entergy for the first quarter 2016. Entergy does not expect ASU 2015-03 to affect materially its results of operations, financial position, or cash flows.
In May 2015 the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-07, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosures for Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent).” The ASU removes the requirements to categorize within the fair value hierarchy all investments for which fair value is measured using the net asset value per share practical expedient. The ASU also removes the requirement to make certain disclosures for all investments that are eligible to be measured at fair value using the net asset value per share practical expedient. The disclosures are limited to investments for which the entity has elected to measure the fair value using that practical expedient. ASU 2015-07 is effective for Entergy for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Entergy does not expect ASU 2015-03 to affect materially its results of operations, financial position, or cash flows.
In July 2015 the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-11, “Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying the Subsequent Measurement of Inventory.” The ASU does not apply to inventory that is measured using last-in, first-out or the retail inventory method. It applies to all other inventory, which includes inventory that is measured using first-in, first-out or average cost. The ASU changes the measurement principle for inventory within the scope of this ASU from the lower of cost or market to lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal and transportation. ASU 2015-11 is effective for Entergy for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Entergy does not expect ASU 2015-11 to affect materially its results of operations, financial position, or cash flows.
19
Table of Contents
ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended
Six Months Ended
2015
2014
2015
2014
(In Thousands, Except Share Data)
OPERATING REVENUES
Electric
$2,246,148
$2,373,842
$4,464,137
$4,600,306
Natural gas
27,777
35,469
87,288
113,689
Competitive businesses
439,306
587,339
1,081,896
1,491,498
TOTAL
2,713,231
2,996,650
5,633,321
6,205,493
OPERATING EXPENSES
Operation and Maintenance:
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
549,702
604,081
1,180,156
1,147,910
Purchased power
322,929
517,898
664,951
1,092,525
Nuclear refueling outage expenses
67,129
66,497
131,998
126,041
Other operation and maintenance
827,872
814,942
1,597,983
1,550,653
Asset write-offs, impairments, and related charges
—
1,667
—
3,937
Decommissioning
68,830
67,250
138,729
133,049
Taxes other than income taxes
156,378
152,736
313,901
307,204
Depreciation and amortization
340,354
331,742
672,340
660,465
Other regulatory charges (credits)
2,654
(14,640
)
13,111
(10,645
)
TOTAL
2,335,848
2,542,173
4,713,169
5,011,139
OPERATING INCOME
377,383
454,477
920,152
1,194,354
OTHER INCOME
Allowance for equity funds used during construction
11,974
14,788
23,712
29,917
Interest and investment income
39,705
24,245
107,839
59,493
Miscellaneous - net
(15,743
)
(14,675
)
(24,764
)
(26,379
)
TOTAL
35,936
24,358
106,787
63,031
INTEREST EXPENSE
Interest expense
165,860
164,327
332,197
326,877
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction
(6,044
)
(8,516
)
(12,161
)
(15,535
)
TOTAL
159,816
155,811
320,036
311,342
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES
253,503
323,024
706,903
946,043
Income taxes
99,781
128,743
250,252
345,709
CONSOLIDATED NET INCOME
153,722
194,281
456,651
600,334
Preferred dividend requirements of subsidiaries
4,879
4,898
9,759
9,777
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO ENTERGY CORPORATION
$148,843
$189,383
$446,892
$590,557
Earnings per average common share:
Basic
$0.83
$1.06
$2.49
$3.30
Diluted
$0.83
$1.05
$2.48
$3.29
Dividends declared per common share
$0.83
$0.83
$1.66
$1.66
Basic average number of common shares outstanding
179,521,276
179,354,103
179,589,748
179,077,503
Diluted average number of common shares outstanding
180,119,837
180,045,432
180,298,233
179,547,020
See Notes to Financial Statements.
20
Table of Contents
ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended
Six Months Ended
2015
2014
2015
2014
(In Thousands)
Net Income
$153,722
$194,281
$456,651
$600,334
Other comprehensive income (loss)
Cash flow hedges net unrealized gain (loss)
(net of tax expense (benefit) of $20,706, ($3,772), $4,808, and $3,453)
38,696
(6,744
)
9,366
7,010
Pension and other postretirement liabilities
(net of tax expense of $4,165, $1,822, $7,340, and $19,583)
7,438
3,459
15,886
(9,237
)
Net unrealized investment gains (losses)
(net of tax expense (benefit) of ($30,292), $29,580, ($26,626), and $35,328)
(33,880
)
39,235
(29,877
)
62,224
Foreign currency translation
(net of tax expense of $359, $172, $62, and $213)
667
320
116
395
Other comprehensive income (loss)
12,921
36,270
(4,509
)
60,392
Comprehensive Income
166,643
230,551
452,142
660,726
Preferred dividend requirements of subsidiaries
4,879
4,898
9,759
9,777
Comprehensive Income Attributable to Entergy Corporation
$161,764
$225,653
$442,383
$650,949
See Notes to Financial Statements.
21
Table of Contents
ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014
(Unaudited)
2015
2014
(In Thousands)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Consolidated net income
$456,651
$600,334
Adjustments to reconcile consolidated net income to net cash flow provided by operating activities:
Depreciation, amortization, and decommissioning, including nuclear fuel amortization
1,069,888
1,041,970
Deferred income taxes, investment tax credits, and non-current taxes accrued
180,006
357,571
Changes in working capital:
Receivables
(100,168
)
(47,120
)
Fuel inventory
(3,748
)
32,125
Accounts payable
(104,595
)
46,697
Taxes accrued
(19,027
)
(39,317
)
Interest accrued
(18,984
)
1,508
Deferred fuel costs
72,449
(237,726
)
Other working capital accounts
(124,146
)
(115,605
)
Changes in provisions for estimated losses
(6,987
)
4,314
Changes in other regulatory assets
124,785
26,070
Changes in other regulatory liabilities
(15,059
)
89,860
Changes in pensions and other postretirement liabilities
(116,896
)
(128,922
)
Other
(55,808
)
(103,196
)
Net cash flow provided by operating activities
1,338,361
1,528,563
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Construction/capital expenditures
(1,095,926
)
(959,618
)
Allowance for equity funds used during construction
25,165
31,577
Nuclear fuel purchases
(165,704
)
(236,296
)
Proceeds from sale of assets
—
10,100
Insurance proceeds received for property damages
12,745
28,226
Changes in securitization account
6,604
6,987
NYPA value sharing payment
(70,790
)
(72,000
)
Payments to storm reserve escrow account
(3,689
)
(3,624
)
Increase in other investments
(54,022
)
(140,772
)
Proceeds from nuclear decommissioning trust fund sales
948,542
981,530
Investment in nuclear decommissioning trust funds
(973,016
)
(1,036,770
)
Net cash flow used in investing activities
(1,370,091
)
(1,390,660
)
See Notes to Financial Statements.
22
Table of Contents
ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014
(Unaudited)
2015
2014
(In Thousands)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from the issuance of:
Long-term debt
865,634
1,232,161
Treasury stock
23,897
81,358
Retirement of long-term debt
(1,384,658
)
(1,224,733
)
Repurchase of common stock
(25,078
)
(18,259
)
Changes in credit borrowings and commercial paper - net
341,578
(7,538
)
Other
6,719
17,030
Dividends paid:
Common stock
(298,259
)
(297,228
)
Preferred stock
(9,759
)
(9,752
)
Net cash flow used in financing activities
(479,926
)
(226,961
)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
(511,656
)
(89,058
)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
1,422,026
739,126
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$910,370
$650,068
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest - net of amount capitalized
$340,993
$312,747
Income taxes
$90,767
$19,505
See Notes to Financial Statements.
23
Table of Contents
ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014
(Unaudited)
2015
2014
(In Thousands)
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents:
Cash
$60,004
$131,327
Temporary cash investments
850,366
1,290,699
Total cash and cash equivalents
910,370
1,422,026
Accounts receivable:
Customer
636,610
596,917
Allowance for doubtful accounts
(38,398
)
(35,663
)
Other
191,932
220,342
Accrued unbilled revenues
400,219
321,659
Total accounts receivable
1,190,363
1,103,255
Deferred fuel costs
98,196
155,140
Accumulated deferred income taxes
15,580
27,783
Fuel inventory - at average cost
209,182
205,434
Materials and supplies - at average cost
941,422
918,584
Deferred nuclear refueling outage costs
273,060
214,188
Prepayments and other
446,877
343,223
TOTAL
4,085,050
4,389,633
OTHER PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS
Investment in affiliates - at equity
34,634
36,234
Decommissioning trust funds
5,389,376
5,370,932
Non-utility property - at cost (less accumulated depreciation)
217,115
213,791
Other
409,860
405,169
TOTAL
6,050,985
6,026,126
PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT
Electric
45,613,586
44,881,419
Property under capital lease
945,119
945,784
Natural gas
384,748
377,565
Construction work in progress
1,349,863
1,425,981
Nuclear fuel
1,480,973
1,542,055
TOTAL PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT
49,774,289
49,172,804
Less - accumulated depreciation and amortization
20,916,387
20,449,858
PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT - NET
28,857,902
28,722,946
DEFERRED DEBITS AND OTHER ASSETS
Regulatory assets:
Regulatory asset for income taxes - net
791,580
836,064
Other regulatory assets (includes securitization property of $677,089 as of June 30, 2015 and $724,839 as of December 31, 2014)
4,858,300
4,968,553
Deferred fuel costs
238,771
238,102
Goodwill
377,172
377,172
Accumulated deferred income taxes
56,566
48,351
Other
949,325
920,907
TOTAL
7,271,714
7,389,149
TOTAL ASSETS
$46,265,651
$46,527,854
See Notes to Financial Statements.
24
Table of Contents
ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014
(Unaudited)
2015
2014
(In Thousands)
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Currently maturing long-term debt
$794,777
$899,375
Notes payable and commercial paper
939,985
598,407
Accounts payable
1,013,026
1,166,431
Customer deposits
417,296
412,166
Taxes accrued
109,081
128,108
Accumulated deferred income taxes
124,598
38,039
Interest accrued
187,026
206,010
Deferred fuel costs
107,776
91,602
Obligations under capital leases
2,606
2,508
Pension and other postretirement liabilities
57,666
57,994
Other
244,534
248,251
TOTAL
3,998,371
3,848,891
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accumulated deferred income taxes and taxes accrued
9,190,368
9,133,161
Accumulated deferred investment tax credits
249,345
247,521
Obligations under capital leases
28,382
29,710
Other regulatory liabilities
1,338,598
1,383,609
Decommissioning and asset retirement cost liabilities
4,486,356
4,458,296
Accumulated provisions
411,157
418,128
Pension and other postretirement liabilities
3,521,728
3,638,295
Long-term debt (includes securitization bonds of $733,828 as of June 30, 2015 and $784,862 as of December 31, 2014)
12,092,042
12,500,109
Other
486,348
557,649
TOTAL
31,804,324
32,366,478
Commitments and Contingencies
Subsidiaries' preferred stock without sinking fund
210,760
210,760
EQUITY
Common Shareholders' Equity:
Common stock, $.01 par value, authorized 500,000,000 shares; issued 254,752,788 shares in 2015 and in 2014
2,548
2,548
Paid-in capital
5,362,333
5,375,353
Retained earnings
10,318,290
10,169,657
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
(46,816
)
(42,307
)
Less - treasury stock, at cost (75,227,174 shares in 2015 and 75,512,079 shares in 2014)
5,478,159
5,497,526
Total common shareholders' equity
10,158,196
10,007,725
Subsidiaries' preferred stock without sinking fund
94,000
94,000
TOTAL
10,252,196
10,101,725
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
$46,265,651
$46,527,854
See Notes to Financial Statements.
25
Table of Contents
ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014
(Unaudited)
Common Shareholders’ Equity
Subsidiaries’ Preferred Stock
Common
Stock
Treasury
Stock
Paid-in
Capital
Retained Earnings
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Total
(In Thousands)
Balance at December 31, 2013
$94,000
$2,548
($5,533,942
)
$5,368,131
$9,825,053
($29,324
)
$9,726,466
Consolidated net income (a)
9,777
—
—
—
590,557
—
600,334
Other comprehensive income
—
—
—
—
—
60,392
60,392
Common stock repurchases
—
—
(18,259
)
—
—
—
(18,259
)
Common stock issuances related to stock plans
—
—
104,276
(9,736
)
—
—
94,540
Common stock dividends declared
—
—
—
—
(297,228
)
—
(297,228
)
Preferred dividend requirements of subsidiaries (a)
(9,777
)
—
—
—
—
—
(9,777
)
Balance at June 30, 2014
$94,000
$2,548
($5,447,925
)
$5,358,395
$10,118,382
$31,068
$10,156,468
Balance at December 31, 2014
$94,000
$2,548
($5,497,526
)
$5,375,353
$10,169,657
($42,307
)
$10,101,725
Consolidated net income (a)
9,759
—
—
—
446,892
—
456,651
Other comprehensive loss
—
—
—
—
—
(4,509
)
(4,509
)
Common stock repurchases
—
—
(25,078
)
—
—
—
(25,078
)
Common stock issuances related to stock plans
—
—
44,445
(13,020
)
—
—
31,425
Common stock dividends declared
—
—
—
—
(298,259
)
—
(298,259
)
Preferred dividend requirements of subsidiaries (a)
(9,759
)
—
—
—
—
—
(9,759
)
Balance at June 30, 2015
$94,000
$2,548
($5,478,159
)
$5,362,333
$10,318,290
($46,816
)
$10,252,196
See Notes to Financial Statements.
(a) Consolidated net income and preferred dividend requirements of subsidiaries for 2015 and 2014 include $6.4 million and $6.4 million, respectively, of preferred dividends on subsidiaries’ preferred stock without sinking fund that is not presented within equity.
26
Table of Contents
ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
SELECTED OPERATING RESULTS
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended
Increase/
Description
2015
2014
(Decrease)
%
(Dollars in Millions)
Utility Electric Operating Revenues:
Residential
$733
$765
($32
)
(4
)
Commercial
597
627
(30
)
(5
)
Industrial
591
708
(117
)
(17
)
Governmental
55
57
(2
)
(4
)
Total retail
1,976
2,157
(181
)
(8
)
Sales for resale
86
53
33
62
Other
184
164
20
12
Total
$2,246
$2,374
($128
)
(5
)
Utility Billed Electric Energy Sales (GWh):
Residential
7,364
7,266
98
1
Commercial
6,904
6,762
142
2
Industrial
10,737
10,902
(165
)
(2
)
Governmental
602
587
15
3
Total retail
25,607
25,517
90
—
Sales for resale
3,138
2,048
1,090
53
Total
28,745
27,565
1,180
4
Entergy Wholesale Commodities:
Operating Revenues
$439
$578
($139
)
(24
)
Billed Electric Energy Sales (GWh)
9,578
11,533
(1,955
)
(17
)
Six Months Ended
Increase/
Description
2015
2014
(Decrease)
%
(Dollars in Millions)
Utility Electric Operating Revenues:
Residential
$1,615
$1,669
($54
)
(3
)
Commercial
1,180
1,204
(24
)
(2
)
Industrial
1,167
1,263
(96
)
(8
)
Governmental
107
110
(3
)
(3
)
Total retail
4,069
4,246
(177
)
(4
)
Sales for resale
146
172
(26
)
(15
)
Other
249
182
67
37
Total
$4,464
$4,600
($136
)
(3
)
Utility Billed Electric Energy Sales (GWh):
Residential
16,796
17,293
(497
)
(3
)
Commercial
13,625
13,563
62
—
Industrial
21,144
21,015
129
1
Governmental
1,194
1,170
24
2
Total retail
52,759
53,041
(282
)
(1
)
Sales for resale
4,949
4,282
667
16
Total
57,708
57,323
385
1
Entergy Wholesale Commodities:
Operating Revenues
$1,082
$1,490
($408
)
(27
)
Billed Electric Energy Sales (GWh)
19,170
21,547
(2,377
)
(11
)
27
Table of Contents
ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTE 1. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy)
Entergy and the Registrant Subsidiaries are involved in a number of legal, regulatory, and tax proceedings before various courts, regulatory commissions, and governmental agencies in the ordinary course of business. While management is unable to predict the outcome of such proceedings, management does not believe that the ultimate resolution of these matters will have a material adverse effect on Entergy’s results of operations, cash flows, or financial condition, except as otherwise discussed in the Form 10-K or in this report. Entergy discusses regulatory proceedings in Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K and herein and discusses tax proceedings in Note 3 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K and Note 10 to the financial statements herein.
ANO Damage, Outage, and NRC Reviews
See Note 8 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the ANO stator incident and subsequent NRC reviews.
As discussed in the Form 10-K, in January 2015 the NRC issued its final risk significance determination for the flood barrier violation originally cited in the September 2014 report. The NRC’s final risk significance determination was classified as “yellow with substantial safety significance.” In March 2015 the NRC issued a letter notifying Entergy of its decision to move ANO into the “multiple/repetitive degraded cornerstone column” of the NRC’s reactor oversight process action matrix. Placement into this column will require significant additional NRC inspection activities at the ANO site, including a review of the site’s root cause evaluation associated with the flood barrier and stator issues, an assessment of the effectiveness of the site’s corrective action program, an additional design basis inspection, a safety culture assessment, and possibly other inspection activities consistent with the NRC’s Inspection Procedure. Excluding remediation and response costs that may result from the additional NRC inspection activities, Entergy Arkansas expects to incur incremental costs of approximately
$50 million
in 2015, of which
$18 million
had been incurred as of June 30, 2015, and approximately
$35 million
in 2016 to prepare for the NRC inspection expected to occur in early 2016.
Baxter Wilson Plant Event
See Note 8 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the Baxter Wilson plant event. During the first quarter 2015, Entergy Mississippi received
$27.8 million
of previously-accrued insurance proceeds with
$12.7 million
allocated to capital spending and
$15.1 million
allocated to operation and maintenance expenses.
Nuclear Fuel Enrichment Contracts
Entergy subsidiaries are parties to two contracts with American Centrifuge Enrichment, LLC (ACE) under which these subsidiaries purchase nuclear fuel enrichment services. The term of each contract is from 2011 to 2022; however, each contract provided for cancellation of the parties’ purchase and sale obligations for 2016-2022 if, by August 1, 2014, ACE’s planned Advanced Centrifuge Plant was not in commercial operation and ACE did not identify to Entergy’s reasonable satisfaction how it would meet its contractual delivery obligations through output from ACE. In August 2014, Entergy sent notice to ACE that the 2016-2022 obligations were canceled by the operation of this contractual provision. United States Enrichment Corporation (USEC), ACE’s affiliate to which ACE assigned the contracts, has filed a demand for arbitration with the American Arbitration Association, claiming damages of approximately
$165 million
. In July 2015 the parties reached an agreement resolving the dispute that resulted in the dismissal of USEC’s claims. The resolution of the dispute does not have a material effect on Entergy’s results of operations, financial position, or cash flows.
28
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
Nuclear Insurance
See Note 8 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for information on nuclear liability and property insurance associated with Entergy’s nuclear power plants.
Conventional Property Insurance
See Note 8 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for information on Entergy’s non-nuclear property insurance program.
Employment Litigation
See Note 8 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for information on Entergy’s employment and labor-related proceedings.
Asbestos Litigation
(Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy New Orleans, and Entergy Texas)
See Note 8 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for information regarding asbestos litigation at Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy New Orleans, and Entergy Texas.
NOTE 2. RATE AND REGULATORY MATTERS
(Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy)
Regulatory Assets and Regulatory Liabilities
See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for information regarding regulatory assets and regulatory liabilities in the Utility business presented on the balance sheets of Entergy and the Registrant Subsidiaries. The following are updates to that discussion.
Fuel and purchased power cost recovery
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana
In July 2014 the LPSC authorized its staff to initiate an audit of Entergy Gulf States Louisiana’s fuel adjustment clause filings. The audit includes a review of the reasonableness of charges flowed by Entergy Gulf States Louisiana through its fuel adjustment clause for the period from 2010 through 2013. Discovery commenced in July 2015.
In July 2014 the LPSC authorized its staff to initiate an audit of Entergy Louisiana’s fuel adjustment clause filings. The audit includes a review of the reasonableness of charges flowed by Entergy Louisiana through its fuel adjustment clause for the period from 2010 through 2013. Discovery commenced in July 2015.
Entergy Mississippi
Entergy Mississippi had a deferred fuel over-recovery balance of
$58.3 million
as of May 31, 2015, along with an under-recovery balance of
$12.3 million
under the power management rider. Pursuant to those tariffs, in July 2015, Entergy Mississippi filed for interim adjustments under both the energy cost recovery rider and the power management rider to flow through to customers the approximately
$46 million
net over-recovery over a six-month period.
29
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
Mississippi Attorney General Complaint
The Mississippi attorney general filed a complaint in state court in December 2008 against Entergy Corporation, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy Services, and Entergy Power alleging, among other things, violations of Mississippi statutes, fraud, and breach of good faith and fair dealing, and requesting an accounting and restitution. The complaint is wide ranging and relates to tariffs and procedures under which Entergy Mississippi purchases power not generated in Mississippi to meet electricity demand. Entergy believes the complaint is unfounded. In December 2008 the defendant Entergy companies removed the Attorney General’s lawsuit to U.S. District Court in Jackson, Mississippi. The Mississippi attorney general moved to remand the matter to state court. In August 2012 the District Court issued an opinion denying the Attorney General’s motion for remand, finding that the District Court has subject matter jurisdiction under the Class Action Fairness Act.
The defendant Entergy companies answered the complaint and filed a counterclaim for relief based upon the Mississippi Public Utilities Act and the Federal Power Act. In May 2009 the defendant Entergy companies filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings asserting grounds of federal preemption, the exclusive jurisdiction of the MPSC, and factual errors in the Attorney General’s complaint. In September 2012 the District Court heard oral argument on Entergy’s motion for judgment on the pleadings.
In January 2014 the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in which it held that cases brought by attorneys general as the sole plaintiff to enforce state laws were not considered “mass actions” under the Class Action Fairness Act, so as to establish federal subject matter jurisdiction. One day later the Attorney General renewed his motion to remand the Entergy case back to state court, citing the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision. The defendant Entergy companies responded to that motion reiterating the additional grounds asserted for federal question jurisdiction, and the District Court held oral argument on the renewed motion to remand in February 2014. In April 2015 the District Court entered an order denying the renewed motion to remand, holding that the District Court has federal question subject matter jurisdiction. The Attorney General appealed to the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals the denial of the motion to remand. In July 2015 the Fifth Circuit issued an order denying the appeal, and the Attorney General subsequently filed a petition for rehearing of the request for interlocutory appeal. The case remains pending in federal district court, awaiting a ruling on the Entergy companies’ motion for judgment on the pleadings.
Entergy New Orleans
In February 2015, Entergy New Orleans filed an application with the City Council seeking authorization to enter into a power purchase agreement, subject to certain conditions, with Entergy Gulf States Louisiana to purchase on a life-of-unit basis
20%
of the capacity and related energy of the two power blocks of the Union Power Station that Entergy Gulf States Louisiana is seeking to purchase. In the application, Entergy New Orleans sought authorization from the City Council for full and timely cost recovery in rates for all costs associated with the power purchase agreement. In June 2015 the parties filed a settlement agreement regarding the power purchase agreement, and the settlement agreement was approved by a City Council resolution in June 2015. The City Council’s resolution approves, subject to certain conditions, the Union power purchase agreement as prudent and in the public interest and deems the costs of that power purchase agreement as eligible for recovery, with capacity costs being recoverable through a rider and energy-related costs being recoverable through the fuel adjustment clause. Long-term service agreement costs are recoverable through the fuel adjustment clause initially, but are subject to possible realignment to base rates in the next base rate case. The City Council approval also requires Entergy New Orleans to credit customer bills
$4.8 million
annually once the deactivation of Michoud Units 2 and 3 occurs.
In July 2015, Entergy Texas, together with other parties, filed a motion with the PUCT to dismiss Entergy Texas’s CCN application to acquire one of the four 495 MW power blocks at the Union Power Station. On July 30, 2015, the PUCT granted the motion to dismiss the CCN case. The power block originally allocated to Entergy Texas will be acquired by Entergy New Orleans, subject to City Council approval and the satisfaction of other conditions to close the transaction. The acquisition by Entergy New Orleans would replace the power purchase agreement with Entergy Gulf States Louisiana that the City Council approved in June 2015. Entergy New Orleans will file an application
30
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
for authorization to proceed with the acquisition and plans to seek City Council resolution by a date that would support closing the transaction by the end of 2015.
Entergy Texas
In August 2014, Entergy Texas filed an application seeking PUCT approval to implement an interim fuel refund of approximately
$24.6 million
for over-collected fuel costs incurred during the months of November 2012 through April 2014. This refund resulted from the net of Entergy Texas’s then current fuel balance, bandwidth remedy payments that Entergy Texas received in May 2014 related to the June - December 2005 period, and bandwidth remedy payments that Entergy Texas made related to calendar year 2013 production costs. Also in August 2014, Entergy Texas filed an unopposed motion for interim rates to implement this refund for most customers over a two-month period commencing with September 2014. The PUCT issued its order approving the interim relief in August 2014 and Entergy Texas completed the refunds in October 2014. Parties intervened in this matter, and all parties agreed that the proceeding should be bifurcated such that the proposed interim refund would become final in a separate proceeding, which refund was approved by the PUCT in March 2015. In July 2015 certain parties filed briefs in the current proceeding asserting that Entergy Texas should refund to retail customers an additional
$10.9 million
in bandwidth remedy payments Entergy Texas received related to calendar year 2006 production costs. The current proceeding is pending.
Retail Rate Proceedings
See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for detailed information regarding retail rate proceedings involving the Utility operating companies. The following are updates to that information.
Filings with the APSC
In April 2015, Entergy Arkansas filed with the APSC for a general change in rates, charges, and tariffs. The filing notifies the APSC of Entergy Arkansas’s intent to implement a formula rate review mechanism pursuant to Arkansas legislation passed in 2015, and requests a retail rate increase of
$268.4
million, with a net increase in revenue of
$167
million. The filing requests a
10.2%
return on common equity. In May 2015 the APSC issued an order suspending the proposed rates and tariffs filed by Entergy Arkansas and establishing a procedural schedule to complete its investigation of Entergy Arkansas’s application. A public evidentiary hearing is scheduled to begin in January 2016.
Filings with the LPSC
Retail Rates - Gas
(Entergy Gulf States Louisiana)
In January 2015, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana filed with the LPSC its gas rate stabilization plan for the test year ended September 30, 2014. The filing showed an earned return on common equity of
7.20%
, which results in a
$706
thousand rate increase. In April 2015 the LPSC issued findings recommending two adjustments to Entergy Gulf States Louisiana’s as-filed results, and an additional recommendation that does not affect current year results. The LPSC staff’s recommended adjustments increase the earned return on equity for the test year to
7.24%
. Entergy Gulf States Louisiana accepted the LPSC staff’s recommendations and a revenue increase of
$688
thousand will be required as opposed to the $706 thousand requested by Entergy Gulf States Louisiana. The resulting change was implemented with the first billing cycle of May 2015.
Filings with the PUCT
In June 2015, Entergy Texas filed a rate case requesting a
$75 million
increase in its base rates and rider rates. The rate case reflected a
10.2%
return on common equity and was based on calendar year 2014 as the test year including pro forma adjustments to reflect the acquisition of Union Power Station Power Block 1, which is one of four units that comprise the Union Power Station near El Dorado, Arkansas. The rate case also included a limited-term rate case
31
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
expense rider to recover over a three-year period the deferred rate case expenses associated with this rate case. In July 2015 the PUCT requested briefing on legal and policy issues related to, among other things, the propriety of rate recovery for the Union Power transaction given the uncertainty of the actual closing date of the transaction and the commencement of the rate year, as well as Entergy Texas’s requirement for acceptable rate treatment as a condition to closing the transaction. Also in July 2015, in connection with the requested briefing, the PUCT staff and certain parties filed briefs concluding that Entergy Texas should not be permitted recovery for the Union Power Station purchase in the rate case. In July 2015, Entergy Texas filed its notice of withdrawal of its base rate case and the ALJs in the case dismissed the case from the dockets of the State Office of Administrative Hearings and the PUCT.
Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Gulf States Louisiana Business Combination
As discussed in the Form 10-K, Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Gulf States Louisiana filed an application with the LPSC in September 2014 seeking authorization to undertake the transactions that would result in the combination of Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Gulf States Louisiana into a single public utility. In the application, Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Gulf States Louisiana identified potential benefits, including enhanced economic and customer diversity, enhanced geographic and supply diversity, and greater administrative efficiency. In the initial proceedings with the LPSC, Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Gulf States Louisiana estimated that the business combination could produce up to $128 million in measurable customer benefits including proposed guaranteed customer credits of $97 million in the first ten years. In April 2015 the LPSC staff and intervenors filed testimony in the LPSC business combination proceeding. The testimony recommended an extensive set of conditions that would be required in order to recommend that the LPSC find that the business combination is in the public interest. The LPSC staff’s primary concern appeared to be potential shifting in fuel costs between legacy Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Gulf States Louisiana customers. In May 2015, Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Gulf States Louisiana filed rebuttal testimony. After the testimony was filed with the LPSC, the parties engaged in settlement discussions that ultimately led to the execution of an uncontested stipulated settlement (“stipulated settlement”), which was filed with the LPSC in July 2015. Through the stipulated settlement, the parties agreed to terms upon which to recommend that the LPSC find that the business combination is in the public interest. The stipulated settlement, which was either joined or unopposed by all parties to the LPSC proceeding, represents a compromise of stakeholder positions and was the result of an extensive period of analysis, discovery, and negotiation. The stipulated settlement provides $107 million in guaranteed customer benefits. Additionally, the combined company will honor the 2013 Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Gulf States Louisiana rate case settlements, including the commitments that (1) there will be no rate increase for legacy Entergy Gulf States Louisiana customers for the 2014 test year, and (2) through the 2016 test year formula rate plan, Entergy Louisiana (as a combined entity) will not raise rates by more than
$30 million
, net of the
$10 million
rate increase included in the Entergy Louisiana legacy formula rate plan. The stipulated settlement also describes the process for implementing a fuel tracker mechanism that is designed to address potential effects arising from the shifting of fuel costs between legacy Entergy Louisiana and legacy Entergy Gulf States Louisiana customers as a result of the combination of those companies’ fuel adjustment clauses by reallocating such cost shifts as between customers on an after-the-fact basis. The calculation of the fuel tracker will be submitted annually in a compliance filing. The stipulated settlement also provides that Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana are permitted to defer certain external costs that were incurred to achieve the business combination’s customer benefits. The deferred amount, which shall not exceed
$25 million
, will be subject to a prudence review and amortized over a 10-year period. A hearing on the stipulated settlement in the LPSC proceeding was held in July 2015. Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Gulf States Louisiana have requested that the LPSC issue its decision regarding the business combination in August 2015.
Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Gulf States Louisiana filed applications with the FERC requesting authorization for the business combination and Entergy Louisiana and Entergy New Orleans filed applications with the FERC requesting authorization of the Algiers asset transfer. The FERC has issued orders authorizing the business combination and the Algiers asset transfer.
32
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
Algiers Asset Transfer
(Entergy Louisiana and Entergy New Orleans)
As discussed in the Form 10-K, in October 2014 Entergy Louisiana and Entergy New Orleans filed an application with the City Council seeking authorization to undertake a transaction that would result in the transfer from Entergy Louisiana to Entergy New Orleans of certain assets that currently serve Entergy Louisiana’s customers in Algiers. In April 2015 the FERC issued an order approving the Algiers assets transfer. In May 2015 the parties filed a settlement agreement authorizing the Algiers assets transfer and the settlement agreement was approved by a City Council resolution in May 2015. Entergy Louisiana expects to transfer the Algiers assets to Entergy New Orleans in September 2015.
System Agreement Cost Equalization Proceedings
See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the proceedings regarding the System Agreement, including the FERC’s October 2011 order that concluded the FERC did have the authority to order refunds, but decided that it would exercise its equitable discretion and not require refunds for the 20-months period from September 13, 2001 - May 2, 2003. Because the ruling on refunds relied on findings in the interruptible load proceeding, the FERC concluded that the refund ruling will be held in abeyance pending the outcome of the rehearing requests in that proceeding. In March 2015, in light of the December 2014 decision by the D.C. Circuit in the interruptible load proceeding, Entergy filed with the FERC a motion to establish briefing schedule on refund issues and an initial brief addressing refund issues. The initial brief argued that the FERC, in response to the D.C. Circuit decision, should clarify its policy on refunds and find that refunds are not required in this proceeding.
Rough Production Cost Equalization Rates
2007 Rate Filing Based on Calendar Year 2006 Production Costs
See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of this proceeding. In March 2015 the D.C. Circuit issued an unpublished order dismissing in part and denying in part the petition for review by the LPSC and denying the petition for review by Entergy.
2008 Rate Filing Based on Calendar Year 2007 Production Costs
See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of this proceeding. In April 2015, after issuance of the March 2015 unpublished opinion of the D.C. Circuit related to the 2007 rate proceeding, as discussed above, Entergy filed an unopposed motion for voluntary dismissal of the petition for review of the FERC’s interest determination. In May 2015 the U.S. Supreme Court denied the LPSC’s petition for a writ of certiorari of the Fifth Circuit’s decision.
2009 Rate Filing Based on Calendar Year 2008 Production Costs
See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of this proceeding. In May 2015 the U.S. Supreme Court denied the LPSC’s petition for a writ of certiorari of the Fifth Circuit’s decision.
Comprehensive Bandwidth Recalculation for 2007, 2008, and 2009 Rate Filing Proceedings
See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of this proceeding. In May 2015 the FERC accepted the 2007 and 2008 comprehensive recalculation compliance filings. As a result, the 2007 and 2008 rate filing proceedings have concluded. The 2009 rate filing proceeding is still pending at FERC.
33
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
2011 Rate Filing Based on Calendar Year 2010 Production Costs
See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of this proceeding. In May 2015, Entergy filed direct testimony in the consolidated rate filings and the LPSC filed direct testimony concerning its complaint proceeding that is consolidated with the rate filings, challenging certain components of the pending bandwidth calculations for prior years. In July 2015 the parties filed direct and answering testimony. Among other issues with the pending bandwidth calculations, the LPSC challenged the administration of the accounting for joint account sales of energy in the intra-system bill.
2012 Rate Filing Based on Calendar Year 2011 Production Costs
See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of this proceeding. In May 2015, Entergy filed direct testimony in the consolidated rate filings and the LPSC filed direct testimony concerning its complaint proceeding that is consolidated with the rate filings, challenging certain components of the pending bandwidth calculations for prior years. In July 2015 the parties filed direct and answering testimony. Among other issues with the pending bandwidth calculations, the LPSC challenged the administration of the accounting for joint account sales of energy in the intra-system bill.
2013 Rate Filing Based on Calendar Year 2012 Production Costs
See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of this proceeding. In May 2015, Entergy filed direct testimony in the consolidated rate filings and the LPSC filed direct testimony concerning its complaint proceeding that is consolidated with the rate filings, challenging certain components of the pending bandwidth calculations for prior years. In July 2015 the parties filed direct and answering testimony. Among other issues with the pending bandwidth calculations, the LPSC challenged the administration of the accounting for joint account sales of energy in the intra-system bill.
2014 Rate Filing Based on Calendar Year 2013 Production Costs
See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of this proceeding. In May 2015, Entergy filed direct testimony in the consolidated rate filings and the LPSC filed direct testimony concerning its complaint proceeding that is consolidated with the rate filings, challenging certain components of the pending bandwidth calculations for prior years. In July 2015 the parties filed direct and answering testimony. Among other issues with the pending bandwidth calculations, the LPSC challenged the administration of the accounting for joint account sales of energy in the intra-system bill.
2015 Rate Filing Based on Calendar Year 2014 Production Costs
In May 2015, Entergy filed with the FERC the 2015 rates in accordance with the FERC’s orders in the System Agreement proceeding. The filing shows that no payments and receipts are required in 2015 to implement the FERC’s remedy based on calendar year 2014 production costs. Several parties intervened in the proceeding and the LPSC and City Council intervened and filed comments.
Interruptible Load Proceeding
As discussed in the
Form 10-K, in May 2013 the LPSC filed a petition for review with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit seeking review of FERC prior orders in the interruptible load proceeding that concluded that the FERC would exercise its discretion and not order refunds in this proceeding. In December 2014 the D.C. Circuit issued an order on the LPSC’s appeal and remanded the case back to the FERC. The D.C. Circuit rejected the LPSC’s argument that there is a presumption in favor of refunds, but it held that the FERC had not adequately explained its decision to deny refunds and directed the FERC “to consider the relevant factors and weigh them against one another.” In March 2015, Entergy filed with the FERC a motion to establish a briefing schedule on remand and an
34
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
initial brief on remand to address the December 2014 decision by the D.C. Circuit. The initial brief on remand argued that the FERC, in response to the D.C. Circuit decision, should clarify its policy on refunds and find that refunds are not required in the interruptible load proceeding.
Storm Cost Recovery Filings with Retail Regulators
Entergy New Orleans
As discussed in the Form 10-K, in January 2015, Entergy New Orleans filed with the City Council an application requesting that the City Council grant a financing order authorizing the securitization of Entergy New Orleans’s storm costs, storm reserves, and issuance costs pursuant to Louisiana Act 64. In April 2015 the City Council’s Utility advisors filed direct testimony recommending that the proposed securitization be approved subject to certain limited modifications, and Entergy New Orleans filed rebuttal testimony later in April 2015. In May 2015 the parties entered into an agreement in principle and the City Council issued a financing order authorizing Entergy New Orleans to issue storm recovery bonds in the aggregate amount of
$98.7 million
, including
$31.8 million
for recovery of Entergy New Orleans’s Hurricane Isaac storm recovery costs, including carrying costs,
$63.9 million
to fund and replenish Entergy New Orleans’s storm reserve, and approximately
$3 million
for estimated up-front financing costs associated with the securitization. See Note 4 to the financial statements herein for discussion of the issuance of the securitization bonds in July 2015.
Texas Power Price Lawsuit
See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of this lawsuit. In May 2015 the Court of Appeals granted plaintiffs’ motion for rehearing, withdrew its prior opinion, and set the case for resubmission in June 2015. In July 2015 the Court of Appeals issued a new opinion again finding that the plaintiffs’ claims fall within the exclusive jurisdiction of the FERC and, therefore, the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the case. The Court of Appeals ordered that the state district court dismiss all claims against the Entergy defendants.
NOTE 3. EQUITY (Entergy Corporation, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, and Entergy Louisiana)
Common Stock
Earnings per Share
The following table presents Entergy’s basic and diluted earnings per share calculations included on the consolidated income statements:
For the Three Months Ended June 30,
2015
2014
(In Millions, Except Per Share Data)
Basic earnings per share
Income
Shares
$/share
Income
Shares
$/share
Net income attributable to Entergy Corporation
$148.8
179.5
$0.83
$189.4
179.4
$1.06
Average dilutive effect of:
Stock options
0.2
—
0.2
—
Other equity plans
0.4
—
0.4
(0.01
)
Diluted earnings per share
$148.8
180.1
$0.83
$189.4
180.0
$1.05
The number of stock options not included in the calculation of diluted common shares outstanding due to their antidilutive effect was approximately
5.1 million
for the
three months ended June 30, 2015
and approximately
5.2 million
for the
three months ended June 30, 2014
.
35
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
For the Six Months Ended June 30,
2015
2014
(In Millions, Except Per Share Data)
Basic earnings per share
Income
Shares
$/share
Income
Shares
$/share
Net income attributable to Entergy Corporation
$446.9
179.6
$2.49
$590.6
179.1
$3.30
Average dilutive effect of:
Stock options
0.4
(0.01
)
0.1
—
Other equity plans
0.3
—
0.3
(0.01
)
Diluted earnings per share
$446.9
180.3
$2.48
$590.6
179.5
$3.29
The number of stock options not included in the calculation of diluted common shares outstanding due to their antidilutive effect was approximately
4.3 million
for the
six months ended June 30, 2015
and approximately
7.4 million
for the
six months ended June 30, 2014
.
Entergy’s stock options and other equity compensation plans are discussed in Note 5 to the financial statements herein and in Note 12 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K.
Treasury Stock
During the
six months ended June 30, 2015
, Entergy Corporation issued
610,305
shares of its previously repurchased common stock to satisfy stock option exercises, vesting of shares of restricted stock, and other stock-based awards. During the
six months ended June 30, 2015
, Entergy Corporation repurchased
325,400
shares of its common stock for a total purchase price of
$25.1 million
.
Retained Earnings
On July 31, 2015, Entergy Corporation’s Board of Directors declared a common stock dividend of
$0.83
per share, payable on September 1, 2015 to holders of record as of August 13, 2015.
Comprehensive Income
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) is included in the equity section of the balance sheets of Entergy, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, and Entergy Louisiana. The following table presents changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for Entergy for the
three months ended June 30, 2015
by component:
Cash flow
hedges
net
unrealized
gain (loss)
Pension
and
other
postretirement
liabilities
Net
unrealized
investment
gain (loss)
Foreign
currency
translation
Total
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
(In Thousands)
Beginning balance, March 31, 2015
$68,788
($561,341
)
$430,698
$2,118
($59,737
)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications
88,796
—
(25,108
)
667
64,355
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
(50,100
)
7,438
(8,772
)
—
(51,434
)
Net other comprehensive income (loss) for the period
38,696
7,438
(33,880
)
667
12,921
Ending balance, June 30, 2015
$107,484
($553,903
)
$396,818
$2,785
($46,816
)
36
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
The following table presents changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for Entergy for the three months ended June 30, 2014 by component:
Cash flow
hedges
net
unrealized
gain (loss)
Pension
and
other
postretirement
liabilities
Net
unrealized
investment
gain (loss)
Foreign
currency
translation
Total
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
(In Thousands)
Beginning balance, March 31, 2014
($68,023
)
($300,919
)
$360,245
$3,495
($5,202
)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications
(7,245
)
—
40,807
320
33,882
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
501
3,459
(1,572
)
—
2,388
Net other comprehensive income (loss) for the period
(6,744
)
3,459
39,235
320
36,270
Ending balance, June 30, 2014
($74,767
)
($297,460
)
$399,480
$3,815
$31,068
The following table presents changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for Entergy for the six months ended June 30, 2015 by component:
Cash flow
hedges
net
unrealized
gain (loss)
Pension
and
other
postretirement
liabilities
Net
unrealized
investment
gain (loss)
Foreign
currency
translation
Total
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
(In Thousands)
Beginning balance, December 31, 2014
$98,118
($569,789
)
$426,695
$2,669
($42,307
)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications
67,900
13
(12,450
)
116
55,579
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
(58,534
)
15,873
(17,427
)
—
(60,088
)
Net other comprehensive income (loss) for the period
9,366
15,886
(29,877
)
116
(4,509
)
Ending balance, June 30, 2015
$107,484
($553,903
)
$396,818
$2,785
($46,816
)
37
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
The following table presents changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for Entergy for the six months ended June 30, 2014 by component:
Cash flow
hedges
net
unrealized
gain (loss)
Pension
and
other
postretirement
liabilities
Net
unrealized
investment
gain (loss)
Foreign
currency
translation
Total
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
(In Thousands)
Beginning balance, December 31, 2013
($81,777
)
($288,223
)
$337,256
$3,420
($29,324
)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications
(120,177
)
—
65,530
395
(54,252
)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
127,187
(9,237
)
(3,306
)
—
114,644
Net other comprehensive income (loss) for the period
7,010
(9,237
)
62,224
395
60,392
Ending balance, June 30, 2014
($74,767
)
($297,460
)
$399,480
$3,815
$31,068
The following table presents changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana for the three months ended June 30, 2015:
Pension and Other
Postretirement Liabilities
Entergy
Gulf States
Louisiana
Entergy
Louisiana
(In Thousands)
Beginning balance March 31, 2015
($52,925
)
($25,918
)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss)
438
(26
)
Net other comprehensive income (loss) for the period
438
(26
)
Ending balance, June 30, 2015
($52,487
)
($25,944
)
The following table presents changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana for the three months ended June 30, 2014:
Pension and Other
Postretirement Liabilities
Entergy
Gulf States
Louisiana
Entergy
Louisiana
(In Thousands)
Beginning balance March 31, 2014
($28,080
)
($9,937
)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss)
137
(287
)
Net other comprehensive income (loss) for the period
137
(287
)
Ending balance, June 30, 2014
($27,943
)
($10,224
)
38
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
The following table presents changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana for the six months ended June 30, 2015:
Pension and Other
Postretirement Liabilities
Entergy
Gulf States
Louisiana
Entergy
Louisiana
(In Thousands)
Beginning balance, December 31, 2014
($53,347
)
($25,876
)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss)
860
(68
)
Net other comprehensive income (loss) for the period
860
(68
)
Ending balance, June 30, 2015
($52,487
)
($25,944
)
The following table presents changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana for the six months ended June 30, 2014:
Pension and Other
Postretirement Liabilities
Entergy
Gulf States
Louisiana
Entergy
Louisiana
(In Thousands)
Beginning balance, December 31, 2013
($28,202
)
($9,635
)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss)
259
(589
)
Net other comprehensive income (loss) for the period
259
(589
)
Ending balance, June 30, 2014
($27,943
)
($10,224
)
39
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
Total reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (AOCI) for Entergy for the three months ended June 30, 2015 are as follows:
Amounts
reclassified
from
AOCI
Income Statement Location
(In Thousands)
Cash flow hedges net unrealized gain (loss)
Power contracts
$77,587
Competitive business operating revenues
Interest rate swaps
(510
)
Miscellaneous - net
Total realized gain (loss) on cash flow hedges
77,077
(26,977
)
Income taxes
Total realized gain (loss) on cash flow hedges (net of tax)
$50,100
Pension and other postretirement liabilities
Amortization of prior-service credit
$5,985
(a)
Amortization of loss
(17,588
)
(a)
Total amortization
(11,603
)
4,165
Income taxes
Total amortization (net of tax)
($7,438
)
Net unrealized investment gain (loss)
Realized gain (loss)
$17,201
Interest and investment income
(8,429
)
Income taxes
Total realized investment gain (loss) (net of tax)
$8,772
Total reclassifications for the period (net of tax)
$51,434
(a)
These accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) components are included in the computation of net periodic pension and other postretirement cost. See Note 6 to the financial statements herein for additional details.
40
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
Total reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (AOCI) for Entergy for the three months ended June 30, 2014 are as follows:
Amounts
reclassified
from
AOCI
Income Statement Location
(In Thousands)
Cash flow hedges net unrealized gain (loss)
Power contracts
($672
)
Competitive business operating revenues
Interest rate swaps
(99
)
Miscellaneous - net
Total realized gain (loss) on cash flow hedges
(771
)
270
Income taxes
Total realized gain (loss) on cash flow hedges (net of tax)
($501
)
Pension and other postretirement liabilities
Amortization of prior-service credit
$5,075
(a)
Amortization of loss
(8,970
)
(a)
Settlement loss
(1,386
)
(a)
Total amortization
(5,281
)
1,822
Income taxes
Total amortization (net of tax)
($3,459
)
Net unrealized investment gain (loss)
Realized gain (loss)
$3,083
Interest and investment income
(1,511
)
Income taxes
Total realized investment gain (loss) (net of tax)
$1,572
Total reclassifications for the period (net of tax)
($2,388
)
(a)
These accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) components are included in the computation of net periodic pension and other postretirement cost. See Note 6 to the financial statements herein for additional details.
41
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
Total reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (AOCI) for Entergy for the six months ended June 30, 2015 are as follows:
Amounts
reclassified
from
AOCI
Income Statement Location
(In Thousands)
Cash flow hedges net unrealized gain (loss)
Power contracts
$91,109
Competitive business operating revenues
Interest rate swaps
(1,056
)
Miscellaneous - net
Total realized gain (loss) on cash flow hedges
90,053
(31,519
)
Income taxes
Total realized gain (loss) on cash flow hedges (net of tax)
$58,534
Pension and other postretirement liabilities
Amortization of prior-service credit
$11,971
(a)
Amortization of loss
(35,176
)
(a)
Total amortization
(23,205
)
7,332
Income taxes
Total amortization (net of tax)
($15,873
)
Net unrealized investment gain (loss)
Realized gain (loss)
$34,171
Interest and investment income
(16,744
)
Income taxes
Total realized investment gain (loss) (net of tax)
$17,427
Total reclassifications for the period (net of tax)
$60,088
(a)
These accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) components are included in the computation of net periodic pension and other postretirement cost. See Note 6 to the financial statements herein for additional details.
42
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
Total reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (AOCI) for Entergy for the six months ended June 30, 2014 are as follows:
Amounts
reclassified
from
AOCI
Income Statement Location
(In Thousands)
Cash flow hedges net unrealized gain (loss)
Power contracts
($195,275
)
Competitive business operating revenues
Interest rate swaps
(397
)
Miscellaneous - net
Total realized gain (loss) on cash flow hedges
(195,672
)
68,485
Income taxes
Total realized gain (loss) on cash flow hedges (net of tax)
($127,187
)
Pension and other postretirement liabilities
Amortization of prior-service credit
$10,153
(a)
Amortization of loss
(17,951
)
(a)
Settlement loss
(2,548
)
(a)
Total amortization
(10,346
)
19,583
Income taxes
Total amortization (net of tax)
$9,237
Net unrealized investment gain (loss)
Realized gain (loss)
$6,483
Interest and investment income
(3,177
)
Income taxes
Total realized investment gain (loss) (net of tax)
$3,306
Total reclassifications for the period (net of tax)
($114,644
)
(a)
These accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) components are included in the computation of net periodic pension and other postretirement cost. See Note 6 to the financial statements herein for additional details.
43
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
Total reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (AOCI) for Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana for the three months ended June 30, 2015 are as follows:
Amounts reclassified
from AOCI
Entergy
Gulf States
Louisiana
Entergy
Louisiana
Income Statement Location
(In Thousands)
Pension and other postretirement liabilities
Amortization of prior-service credit
$1,021
$845
(a)
Amortization of loss
(1,733
)
(802
)
(a)
Total amortization
(712
)
43
274
(17
)
Income tax expense (benefit)
Total amortization (net of tax)
(438
)
26
Total reclassifications for the period (net of tax)
($438
)
$26
(a)
These accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) components are included in the computation of net periodic pension and other postretirement cost. See Note 6 to the financial statements herein for additional details.
Total reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (AOCI) for Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana for the three months ended June 30, 2014 are as follows:
Amounts reclassified
from AOCI
Entergy
Gulf States
Louisiana
Entergy
Louisiana
Income Statement Location
(In Thousands)
Pension and other postretirement liabilities
Amortization of prior-service credit
$559
$845
(a)
Amortization of loss
(781
)
(378
)
(a)
Total amortization
(222
)
467
85
(180
)
Income tax expense (benefit)
Total amortization (net of tax)
(137
)
287
Total reclassifications for the period (net of tax)
($137
)
$287
(a)
These accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) components are included in the computation of net periodic pension and other postretirement cost. See Note 6 to the financial statements herein for additional details.
44
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
Total reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (AOCI) for Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana for the six months ended June 30, 2015 are as follows:
Amounts reclassified
from AOCI
Entergy
Gulf States
Louisiana
Entergy
Louisiana
Income Statement Location
(In Thousands)
Pension and other postretirement liabilities
Amortization of prior-service credit
$2,043
$1,690
(a)
Amortization of loss
(3,466
)
(1,604
)
(a)
Total amortization
(1,423
)
86
563
(18
)
Income tax expense (benefit)
Total amortization (net of tax)
(860
)
68
Total reclassifications for the period (net of tax)
($860
)
$68
(a)
These accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) components are included in the computation of net periodic pension and other postretirement cost. See Note 6 to the financial statements herein for additional details.
Total reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (AOCI) for Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana for the six months ended June 30, 2014 are as follows:
Amounts reclassified
from AOCI
Entergy
Gulf States
Louisiana
Entergy
Louisiana
Income Statement Location
(In Thousands)
Pension and other postretirement liabilities
Amortization of prior-service credit
$1,118
$1,689
(a)
Amortization of loss
(1,563
)
(756
)
(a)
Total amortization
(445
)
933
186
(344
)
Income tax expense (benefit)
Total amortization (net of tax)
(259
)
589
Total reclassifications for the period (net of tax)
($259
)
$589
(a)
These accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) components are included in the computation of net periodic pension and other postretirement cost. See Note 6 to the financial statements herein for additional details.
45
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
NOTE 4. REVOLVING CREDIT FACILITIES, LINES OF CREDIT, SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS, AND LONG-TERM DEBT
(Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy)
Entergy Corporation has in place a credit facility that has a borrowing capacity of
$3.5 billion
and expires in March 2019. Entergy Corporation also has the ability to issue letters of credit against
50%
of the total borrowing capacity of the credit facility. The commitment fee is currently
0.275%
of the undrawn commitment amount. Commitment fees and interest rates on loans under the credit facility can fluctuate depending on the senior unsecured debt ratings of Entergy Corporation. The weighted average interest rate for the
six months ended June 30, 2015
was
1.94%
on the drawn portion of the facility. Following is a summary of the borrowings outstanding and capacity available under the facility as of
June 30, 2015
.
Capacity
Borrowings
Letters
of Credit
Capacity
Available
(In Millions)
$3,500
$271
$9
$3,220
Entergy Corporation’s facility requires it to maintain a consolidated debt ratio of
65%
or less of its total capitalization. Entergy is in compliance with this covenant. If Entergy fails to meet this ratio, or if Entergy Corporation or one of the Utility operating companies (except Entergy New Orleans) defaults on other indebtedness or is in bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings, an acceleration of the facility maturity date may occur.
Entergy Corporation has a commercial paper program with a Board-approved program limit of up to
$1.5 billion
. At
June 30, 2015
, Entergy Corporation had
$895 million
of commercial paper outstanding. The weighted-average interest rate for the
six months ended June 30, 2015
was
0.89%
.
Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, and Entergy Texas each had credit facilities available as of
June 30, 2015
as follows:
Company
Expiration
Date
Amount of
Facility
Interest Rate (a)
Amount Drawn
as of
June 30, 2015
Entergy Arkansas
April 2016
$20 million (b)
1.69%
$—
Entergy Arkansas
March 2019
$150 million (c)
1.69%
$—
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana
March 2019
$150 million (d)
1.44%
$—
Entergy Louisiana
March 2019
$200 million (e)
1.44%
$—
Entergy Mississippi
May 2016
$37.5 million (f)
1.69%
$—
Entergy Mississippi
May 2016
$35 million (f)
1.69%
$—
Entergy Mississippi
May 2016
$20 million (f)
1.69%
$—
Entergy Mississippi
May 2016
$10 million (f)
1.69%
$—
Entergy New Orleans
November 2015
$25 million
1.94%
$—
Entergy Texas
March 2019
$150 million (g)
1.69%
$—
(a)
The interest rate is the rate as of
June 30, 2015
that would most likely apply to outstanding borrowings under the facility.
(b)
Borrowings under the Entergy Arkansas credit facility may be secured by a security interest in its accounts receivable at Entergy Arkansas’s option.
(c)
The credit facility allows Entergy Arkansas to issue letters of credit against
50%
of the borrowing capacity of the facility. As of
June 30, 2015
, no letters of credit were outstanding.
(d)
The credit facility allows Entergy Gulf States Louisiana to issue letters of credit against
50%
of the borrowing capacity of the facility. As of
June 30, 2015
, no letters of credit were outstanding.
46
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
(e)
The credit facility allows Entergy Louisiana to issue letters of credit against
50%
of the borrowing capacity of the facility. As of
June 30, 2015
,
$3 million
in letters of credit were outstanding.
(f)
Borrowings under the Entergy Mississippi credit facilities may be secured by a security interest in its accounts receivable at Entergy Mississippi’s option.
(g)
The credit facility allows Entergy Texas to issue letters of credit against
50%
of the borrowing capacity of the facility. As of
June 30, 2015
,
$1.3 million
in letters of credit were outstanding.
The commitment fees on the credit facilities range from
0.125%
to
0.275%
of the undrawn commitment amount. Each of the credit facilities requires the Registrant Subsidiary borrower to maintain a debt ratio of
65%
or less of its total capitalization. Each Registrant Subsidiary is in compliance with this covenant.
In addition, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, and Entergy Texas each entered into one or more uncommitted standby letter of credit facilities as a means to post collateral to support its obligations related to MISO. Following is a summary of the uncommitted standby letter of credit facilities as of
June 30, 2015
:
Company
Amount of Uncommitted Facility
Letter of Credit Fee
Letters of Credit
Issued as of
June 30, 2015 (a)
Entergy Arkansas
$25 million
0.70
%
$2 million
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana
$75 million
0.70
%
$16.6 million
Entergy Louisiana
$50 million
0.70
%
$1 million
Entergy Mississippi
$40 million
0.70
%
$6.5 million
Entergy Mississippi
$40 million
1.50
%
$—
Entergy New Orleans
$15 million
0.75
%
$9.7 million
Entergy Texas
$50 million
0.70
%
$14.5 million
(a)
The amount for Entergy Texas includes
$0.6 million
related to FTR exposure. See Note 8 to the financial statements herein for discussion of FTRs.
The short-term borrowings of the Registrant Subsidiaries are limited to amounts authorized by the FERC. The current FERC-authorized limits are effective through October 31, 2015. In addition to borrowings from commercial banks, these companies are authorized under a FERC order to borrow from the Entergy System money pool. The money pool is an inter-company borrowing arrangement designed to reduce the Utility subsidiaries’ dependence on external short-term borrowings. Borrowings from the money pool and external short term borrowings combined may not exceed the FERC-authorized limits. The following are the FERC-authorized limits for short-term borrowings and the outstanding short-term borrowings as of
June 30, 2015
(aggregating both money pool and external short-term borrowings) for the Registrant Subsidiaries:
Authorized
Borrowings
(In Millions)
Entergy Arkansas
$250
$—
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana
$200
$—
Entergy Louisiana
$250
$—
Entergy Mississippi
$175
$—
Entergy New Orleans
$100
$—
Entergy Texas
$200
$—
System Energy
$200
$—
47
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee Credit Facilities
In January 2015, Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee entered into a credit facility guaranteed by Entergy Corporation with a borrowing capacity of
$60 million
which expires in January 2018. Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee does not have the ability to issue letters of credit against this facility. This facility provides working capital to Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee for general business purposes including, without limitation, the decommissioning of Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee’s nuclear facilities. As of
June 30, 2015
, no amounts were outstanding under the facility. The commitment fee is currently
0.25%
of the undrawn commitment amount. The rate as of
June 30, 2015
that would most likely apply to outstanding borrowings under the facility was
1.94%
on the drawn portion of the facility.
Also in January 2015, Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee entered into an uncommitted credit facility guaranteed by Entergy Corporation with a borrowing capacity of
$85 million
which expires in January 2018. Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee does not have the ability to issue letters of credit against this facility. This facility provides an additional funding source to Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee for general business purposes including, without limitation, the decommissioning of Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee’s nuclear facilities. As of
June 30, 2015
, no amounts were outstanding under the facility. The rate as of
June 30, 2015
that would most likely apply to outstanding borrowings under the facility was
1.94%
on the drawn portion of the facility.
Variable Interest Entities
(Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, and System Energy)
See Note 18 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the consolidation of the nuclear fuel company variable interest entities (VIE). The nuclear fuel company variable interest entities have credit facilities and also issue commercial paper to finance the acquisition and ownership of nuclear fuel as follows as of
June 30, 2015
:
Company
Expiration
Date
Amount
of
Facility
Weighted
Average
Interest
Rate on Borrowings (a)
Amount
Outstanding as of June 30, 2015
(Dollars in Millions)
Entergy Arkansas VIE
June 2016
$85
n/a
$—
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana VIE
June 2016
$100
1.38%
$32.9
Entergy Louisiana VIE
June 2016
$90
1.51%
$7.4
System Energy VIE
June 2016
$125
1.64%
$37.5
(a)
Includes letter of credit fees and bank fronting fees on commercial paper issuances by the nuclear fuel company variable interest entities for Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, and System Energy. The nuclear fuel company variable interest entity for Entergy Gulf States Louisiana does not issue commercial paper, but borrows directly on its bank credit facility.
Amounts outstanding on the Entergy Gulf States Louisiana nuclear fuel company variable interest entity’s credit facility, if any, are included in long-term debt on its balance sheet and commercial paper outstanding for the other nuclear fuel company variable interest entities is classified as a current liability on the respective balance sheets. The commitment fees on the credit facilities are
0.10%
of the undrawn commitment amount for the Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Gulf States Louisiana VIEs and
0.125%
of the undrawn commitment amount for the Entergy Arkansas and System Energy VIEs. Each credit facility requires the respective lessee of nuclear fuel (Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, or Entergy Corporation as guarantor for System Energy) to maintain a consolidated debt ratio of
70%
or less of its total capitalization.
48
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
The nuclear fuel company variable interest entities had notes payable that are included in debt on the respective balance sheets as of
June 30, 2015
as follows:
Company
Description
Amount
Entergy Arkansas VIE
3.23% Series J due July 2016
$55 million
Entergy Arkansas VIE
2.62% Series K due December 2017
$60 million
Entergy Arkansas VIE
3.65% Series L due July 2021
$90 million
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana VIE
3.25% Series Q due July 2017
$75 million
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana VIE
3.38% Series R due August 2020
$70 million
Entergy Louisiana VIE
3.30% Series F due March 2016
$20 million
Entergy Louisiana VIE
3.25% Series G due July 2017
$25 million
Entergy Louisiana VIE
3.92% Series H due February 2021
$40 million
System Energy VIE
4.02% Series H due February 2017
$50 million
System Energy VIE
3.78% Series I due October 2018
$85 million
In accordance with regulatory treatment, interest on the nuclear fuel company variable interest entities’ credit facilities, commercial paper, and long-term notes payable is reported in fuel expense.
Debt Issuances and Redemptions
(Entergy Corporation)
In July 2015, Entergy Corporation issued
$650 million
of
4.0%
Series senior notes due July 2022. Entergy Corporation will use the proceeds to pay, at maturity, its
$550 million
of
3.625%
Series senior notes due September 2015, to repay a portion of its commercial paper outstanding, and to repay borrowings under the Entergy Corporation credit facility.
(Entergy New Orleans)
In May 2015, the City Council issued a financing order authorizing the issuance of securitization bonds to recover Entergy New Orleans’s Hurricane Isaac storm restoration costs of
$31.8 million
, including carrying costs, the costs of funding and replenishing the storm recovery reserve in the amount of
$63.9 million
, and approximately
$3 million
of up-front financing costs associated with the securitization. In July 2015, Entergy New Orleans Storm Recovery Funding I, L.L.C., a company wholly owned and consolidated by Entergy New Orleans, issued
$98.7 million
of storm cost recovery bonds. The bonds have a coupon of
2.67%
and an expected maturity date of June 2024. Although the principal amount is not due until the date given above, Entergy New Orleans Storm Recovery Funding expects to make principal payments on the bonds over the next five years in the amounts of
$11.4 million
for 2016,
$10.6 million
for 2017,
$11 million
for 2018,
$11.2 million
for 2019, and
$11.6 million
for 2020. With the proceeds, Entergy New Orleans Storm Recovery Funding purchased from Entergy New Orleans the storm recovery property, which is the right to recover from customers through a storm recovery charge amounts sufficient to service the securitization bonds. The storm recovery property will be reflected as a regulatory asset on the consolidated Entergy New Orleans balance sheet. The creditors of Entergy New Orleans do not have recourse to the assets or revenues of Entergy New Orleans Storm Recovery Funding, including the storm recovery property, and the creditors of Entergy New Orleans Storm Recovery Funding do not have recourse to the assets or revenues of Entergy New Orleans. Entergy New Orleans has no payment obligations to Entergy New Orleans Storm Recovery Funding except to remit storm recovery charge collections.
49
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
(Entergy Texas)
In May 2015, Entergy Texas issued
$250 million
of
5.15%
Series first mortgage bonds due June 2045. Entergy Texas used the proceeds to pay, at maturity, its
$200 million
of
3.60%
Series first mortgage bonds due June 2015 and for general corporate purposes.
(System Energy)
In April 2015, the System Energy nuclear fuel company variable interest entity redeemed, at maturity, its
$60 million
of
5.33%
Series G notes.
In May 2015, System Energy redeemed
$35 million
of its
$216 million
of
5.875%
Series governmental bonds due in 2022.
Fair Value
The book value and the fair value of long-term debt for Entergy Corporation and the Registrant Subsidiaries as of
June 30, 2015
are as follows:
Book Value
of Long-Term Debt
Fair Value
of Long-Term Debt (a) (b)
(In Thousands)
Entergy
$12,886,819
$12,963,574
Entergy Arkansas
$2,664,952
$2,501,634
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana
$1,655,841
$1,722,029
Entergy Louisiana
$3,331,389
$3,360,897
Entergy Mississippi
$1,058,900
$1,086,306
Entergy New Orleans
$225,877
$224,803
Entergy Texas
$1,493,432
$1,627,335
System Energy
$604,533
$573,247
(a)
The values exclude lease obligations of
$112 million
at Entergy Louisiana and
$39 million
at System Energy, long-term DOE obligations of
$181 million
at Entergy Arkansas, and the note payable to NYPA of
$81 million
at Entergy, and include debt due within one year.
(b)
Fair values are classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy discussed in Note 8 to the financial statements and are based on prices derived from inputs such as benchmark yields and reported trades.
50
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
The book value and the fair value of long-term debt for Entergy Corporation and the Registrant Subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2014
were as follows:
Book Value
of Long-Term Debt
Fair Value
of Long-Term Debt (a) (b)
(In Thousands)
Entergy
$13,399,484
$13,607,242
Entergy Arkansas
$2,671,343
$2,517,633
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana
$1,622,817
$1,743,143
Entergy Louisiana
$3,356,579
$3,447,404
Entergy Mississippi
$1,058,838
$1,102,741
Entergy New Orleans
$225,866
$226,349
Entergy Texas
$1,478,931
$1,629,124
System Energy
$710,806
$677,475
(a)
The values exclude lease obligations of
$128 million
at Entergy Louisiana and
$51 million
at System Energy, long-term DOE obligations of
$181 million
at Entergy Arkansas, and the note payable to NYPA of
$80 million
at Entergy, and include debt due within one year.
(b)
Fair values are classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy discussed in Note 8 to the financial statements and are based on prices derived from inputs such as benchmark yields and reported trades.
NOTE 5. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION (Entergy Corporation)
Entergy grants stock awards, which are described more fully in Note 12 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K. Awards under Entergy’s plans generally vest over three years.
Stock Options
Entergy granted
456,100
stock options during the first quarter 2015 with a weighted-average fair value of
$11.41
per option. At
June 30, 2015
, there are
7,402,520
stock options outstanding with a weighted-average exercise price of
$84.18
. The intrinsic value, which has no effect on net income, of the outstanding stock options is calculated by the difference in the weighted average exercise price of the stock options granted and Entergy Corporation’s common stock price as of
June 30, 2015
. Because Entergy’s stock price at
June 30, 2015
is less than the weighted average exercise price, the aggregate intrinsic value of the stock options outstanding as of
June 30, 2015
is zero. The intrinsic value of “in the money” stock options is
$8.1 million
as of
June 30, 2015
.
The following table includes financial information for stock options for the
three months ended June 30,
2015 and
2014
:
2015
2014
(In Millions)
Compensation expense included in Entergy’s net income
$1.0
$0.8
Tax benefit recognized in Entergy’s net income
$0.4
$0.3
Compensation cost capitalized as part of fixed assets and inventory
$0.2
$0.1
51
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
The following table includes financial information for stock options for the
six months ended June 30, 2015
and
2014
:
2015
2014
(In Millions)
Compensation expense included in Entergy’s net income
$2.1
$2.1
Tax benefit recognized in Entergy’s net income
$0.8
$0.8
Compensation cost capitalized as part of fixed assets and inventory
$0.4
$0.3
Other Equity Plans
In January 2015 the Board approved and Entergy granted
292,750
restricted stock awards and
156,017
long-term incentive awards under the 2011 Equity Ownership and Long-term Cash Incentive Plan. The restricted stock awards were made effective as of January 29, 2015 and were valued at
$89.90
per share, which was the closing price of Entergy’s common stock on that date. One-third of the restricted stock awards will vest upon each anniversary of the grant date. The long-term incentive awards are granted in the form of performance units, which are equal to the cash value of shares of Entergy Corporation at the end of the performance period, which is the last day of the year. The performance units were made effective as of January 29, 2015 and were valued at
$99.02
per share. Entergy considers various factors, primarily market conditions, in determining the value of the performance units. Shares of the restricted stock awards have the same dividend and voting rights as other common stock, are considered issued and outstanding shares of Entergy upon vesting, and are expensed ratably over the
3
-year vesting period. Shares of the performance units have the same dividend rights as other common stock, are considered issued and outstanding shares of Entergy upon vesting, and are expensed ratably over the
3
-year vesting period.
The following table includes financial information for other equity plans for the
three months ended June 30,
2015
and
2014
:
2015
2014
(In Millions)
Compensation expense included in Entergy’s net income
$8.0
$7.7
Tax benefit recognized in Entergy’s net income
$3.1
$3.0
Compensation cost capitalized as part of fixed assets and inventory
$1.6
$1.2
The following table includes financial information for other equity plans for the
six months ended
June 30, 2015
and
2014
:
2015
2014
(In Millions)
Compensation expense included in Entergy’s net income
$16.1
$15.1
Tax benefit recognized in Entergy’s net income
$6.2
$5.9
Compensation cost capitalized as part of fixed assets and inventory
$3.1
$2.3
52
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
NOTE 6. RETIREMENT AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS (Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy)
Components of Qualified Net Pension Cost
Entergy’s qualified pension cost, including amounts capitalized, for the second quarters of 2015 and 2014, included the following components:
2015
2014
(In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned during the period
$43,762
$35,109
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation
75,694
72,519
Expected return on assets
(98,655
)
(90,366
)
Amortization of prior service cost
390
400
Amortization of loss
58,981
36,274
Net pension costs
$80,172
$53,936
Entergy’s qualified pension cost, including amounts capitalized, for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, included the following components:
2015
2014
(In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned during the period
$87,524
$70,218
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation
151,388
145,038
Expected return on assets
(197,310
)
(180,732
)
Amortization of prior service cost
780
800
Amortization of loss
117,962
72,548
Special termination benefit
76
—
Net pension costs
$160,420
$107,872
The Registrant Subsidiaries’ qualified pension cost, including amounts capitalized, for their employees for the second quarters of 2015 and 2014, included the following components:
2015
Entergy
Arkansas
Entergy
Gulf States
Louisiana
Entergy
Louisiana
Entergy
Mississippi
Entergy
New Orleans
Entergy
Texas
System
Energy
(In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned
during the period
$6,661
$3,821
$4,778
$1,982
$849
$1,645
$1,957
Interest cost on projected
benefit obligation
15,471
7,428
9,939
4,502
2,108
4,354
3,493
Expected return on assets
(20,026
)
(10,160
)
(12,541
)
(6,105
)
(2,725
)
(6,222
)
(4,568
)
Amortization of loss
13,564
5,775
9,176
3,724
2,013
3,238
3,264
Net pension cost
$15,670
$6,864
$11,352
$4,103
$2,245
$3,015
$4,146
53
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
2014
Entergy
Arkansas
Entergy
Gulf States
Louisiana
Entergy
Louisiana
Entergy
Mississippi
Entergy
New Orleans
Entergy
Texas
System
Energy
(In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned
during the period
$5,023
$2,881
$3,546
$1,523
$666
$1,285
$1,446
Interest cost on projected
benefit obligation
14,884
7,278
9,467
4,318
2,041
4,437
3,390
Expected return on assets
(18,305
)
(9,488
)
(11,449
)
(5,698
)
(2,505
)
(5,931
)
(4,155
)
Amortization of loss
8,989
3,981
6,131
2,354
1,449
2,339
2,375
Net pension cost
$10,591
$4,652
$7,695
$2,497
$1,651
$2,130
$3,056
The Registrant Subsidiaries’ qualified pension cost, including amounts capitalized, for their employees for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, included the following components:
2015
Entergy
Arkansas
Entergy
Gulf States
Louisiana
Entergy
Louisiana
Entergy
Mississippi
Entergy
New Orleans
Entergy
Texas
System
Energy
(In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned
during the period
$13,322
$7,642
$9,556
$3,964
$1,698
$3,290
$3,914
Interest cost on projected
benefit obligation
30,942
14,856
19,878
9,004
4,216
8,708
6,986
Expected return on assets
(40,052
)
(20,320
)
(25,082
)
(12,210
)
(5,450
)
(12,444
)
(9,136
)
Amortization of loss
27,128
11,550
18,352
7,448
4,026
6,476
6,528
Net pension cost
$31,340
$13,728
$22,704
$8,206
$4,490
$6,030
$8,292
2014
Entergy
Arkansas
Entergy
Gulf States
Louisiana
Entergy
Louisiana
Entergy
Mississippi
Entergy
New Orleans
Entergy
Texas
System
Energy
(In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned
during the period
$10,046
$5,762
$7,092
$3,046
$1,332
$2,570
$2,892
Interest cost on projected
benefit obligation
29,768
14,556
18,934
8,636
4,082
8,874
6,780
Expected return on assets
(36,610
)
(18,976
)
(22,898
)
(11,396
)
(5,010
)
(11,862
)
(8,310
)
Amortization of loss
17,978
7,962
12,262
4,708
2,898
4,678
4,750
Net pension cost
$21,182
$9,304
$15,390
$4,994
$3,302
$4,260
$6,112
Non-Qualified Net Pension Cost
Entergy recognized
$4.5 million
and
$9.1 million
in pension cost for its non-qualified pension plans in the
second
quarters of
2015
and
2014
, respectively. Reflected in the pension cost for non-qualified pension plans in the
second
quarter of 2014 is a
$4.8 million
settlement charge related to the payment of lump sum benefits out of the plan. Entergy recognized
$8.9 million
and
$19.1 million
in pension cost for its non-qualified pension plans for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Reflected in the pension costs for non-qualified pension plans for the six months ended June 30, 2014 is a
$10.2 million
settlement charge related to the payment of lump sum benefits out of the plan.
54
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
The Registrant Subsidiaries recognized the following pension cost for their employees for their non-qualified pension plans in the second quarters of 2015 and 2014:
Entergy
Arkansas
Entergy
Gulf States
Louisiana
Entergy
Louisiana
Entergy
Mississippi
Entergy
New Orleans
Entergy
Texas
(In Thousands)
Non-qualified pension cost
second quarter 2015
$113
$65
$3
$59
$16
$149
Non-qualified pension cost
second quarter 2014
$119
$33
$1
$48
$24
$119
The Registrant Subsidiaries recognized the following pension cost for their employees for their non-qualified pension plans for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014:
Entergy
Arkansas
Entergy
Gulf States
Louisiana
Entergy
Louisiana
Entergy
Mississippi
Entergy
New Orleans
Entergy
Texas
(In Thousands)
Non-qualified pension cost
six months ended
June 30, 2015
$226
$130
$6
$118
$32
$298
Non-qualified pension cost
six months ended
June 30, 2014
$280
$66
$2
$96
$47
$244
Reflected in Entergy Arkansas’s non-qualified pension costs in the second quarter 2014 is
$11 thousand
in settlement charges related to the payment of lump sum benefits out of the plan. Reflected in Entergy Arkansas’s and Entergy Texas’s non-qualified pension costs for the six months ended June 30, 2014 are
$62 thousand
and
$6 thousand
, respectively, in settlement charges related to the payment of lump sum benefits out of the plan.
Components of Net Other Postretirement Benefit Cost
Entergy’s other postretirement benefit cost, including amounts capitalized, for the second quarters of 2015 and 2014, included the following components:
2015
2014
(In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned during the period
$11,326
$10,873
Interest cost on accumulated postretirement benefit obligation (APBO)
17,984
17,960
Expected return on assets
(11,344
)
(11,197
)
Amortization of prior service credit
(9,320
)
(7,898
)
Amortization of loss
7,893
2,786
Net other postretirement benefit cost
$16,539
$12,524
55
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
Entergy’s other postretirement benefit cost, including amounts capitalized, for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, included the following components:
2015
2014
(In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned during the period
$22,652
$21,746
Interest cost on accumulated postretirement benefit obligation (APBO)
35,968
35,920
Expected return on assets
(22,688
)
(22,394
)
Amortization of prior service credit
(18,640
)
(15,796
)
Amortization of loss
15,786
5,572
Net other postretirement benefit cost
$33,078
$25,048
The Registrant Subsidiaries’ other postretirement benefit cost, including amounts capitalized, for their employees for the second quarters of 2015 and 2014, included the following components:
2015
Entergy
Arkansas
Entergy
Gulf States
Louisiana
Entergy
Louisiana
Entergy
Mississippi
Entergy
New Orleans
Entergy
Texas
System
Energy
(In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned
during the period
$1,739
$1,247
$1,227
$507
$205
$500
$470
Interest cost on APBO
3,130
2,062
2,016
859
652
1,342
628
Expected return on assets
(4,798
)
—
—
(1,542
)
(1,201
)
(2,588
)
(911
)
Amortization of prior service
credit
(610
)
(1,022
)
(845
)
(229
)
(177
)
(681
)
(366
)
Amortization of loss
1,339
977
803
215
118
685
300
Net other postretirement
benefit cost
$800
$3,264
$3,201
($190
)
($403
)
($742
)
$121
2014
Entergy
Arkansas
Entergy
Gulf States
Louisiana
Entergy
Louisiana
Entergy
Mississippi
Entergy
New Orleans
Entergy
Texas
System
Energy
(In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned
during the period
$1,489
$1,224
$1,130
$475
$217
$595
$515
Interest cost on APBO
3,065
2,095
2,066
914
701
1,413
653
Expected return on assets
(4,784
)
—
—
(1,443
)
(1,119
)
(2,590
)
(932
)
Amortization of prior service
credit
(610
)
(559
)
(844
)
(229
)
(177
)
(325
)
(206
)
Amortization of loss
317
303
378
37
14
200
111
Net other postretirement
benefit cost
($523
)
$3,063
$2,730
($246
)
($364
)
($707
)
$141
56
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
The Registrant Subsidiaries’ other postretirement benefit cost, including amounts capitalized, for their employees for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, included the following components:
2015
Entergy
Arkansas
Entergy
Gulf States
Louisiana
Entergy
Louisiana
Entergy
Mississippi
Entergy
New Orleans
Entergy
Texas
System
Energy
(In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned
during the period
$3,478
$2,494
$2,454
$1,014
$410
$1,000
$940
Interest cost on APBO
6,260
4,124
4,032
1,718
1,304
2,684
1,256
Expected return on assets
(9,596
)
—
—
(3,084
)
(2,402
)
(5,176
)
(1,822
)
Amortization of prior service
credit
(1,220
)
(2,044
)
(1,690
)
(458
)
(354
)
(1,362
)
(732
)
Amortization of loss
2,678
1,954
1,606
430
236
1,370
600
Net other postretirement
benefit cost
$1,600
$6,528
$6,402
($380
)
($806
)
($1,484
)
$242
2014
Entergy
Arkansas
Entergy
Gulf States
Louisiana
Entergy
Louisiana
Entergy
Mississippi
Entergy
New Orleans
Entergy
Texas
System
Energy
(In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned
during the period
$2,978
$2,448
$2,260
$950
$434
$1,190
$1,030
Interest cost on APBO
6,130
4,190
4,132
1,828
1,402
2,826
1,306
Expected return on assets
(9,568
)
—
—
(2,886
)
(2,238
)
(5,180
)
(1,864
)
Amortization of prior service
credit
(1,220
)
(1,118
)
(1,688
)
(458
)
(354
)
(650
)
(412
)
Amortization of loss
634
606
756
74
28
400
222
Net other postretirement
benefit cost
($1,046
)
$6,126
$5,460
($492
)
($728
)
($1,414
)
$282
57
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
Reclassification out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
Entergy and the Registrant Subsidiaries reclassified the following costs out of accumulated other comprehensive income (before taxes and including amounts capitalized) for the second quarters of 2015 and 2014:
2015
Qualified
Pension
Costs
Other
Postretirement
Costs
Non-Qualified
Pension Costs
Total
(In Thousands)
Entergy
Amortization of prior service (cost)/credit
($389
)
$6,482
($108
)
$5,985
Amortization of loss
(12,627
)
(4,409
)
(552
)
(17,588
)
($13,016
)
$2,073
($660
)
($11,603
)
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana
Amortization of prior service (cost)/credit
$—
$1,022
($1
)
$1,021
Amortization of loss
(751
)
(977
)
(5
)
(1,733
)
($751
)
$45
($6
)
($712
)
Entergy Louisiana
Amortization of prior service credit
$—
$845
$—
$845
Amortization of loss
—
(802
)
—
(802
)
$—
$43
$—
$43
2014
Qualified
Pension
Costs
Other
Postretirement
Costs
Non-Qualified
Pension Costs
Total
(In Thousands)
Entergy
Amortization of prior service (cost)/credit
($389
)
$5,570
($106
)
$5,075
Amortization of loss
(6,734
)
(1,673
)
(563
)
(8,970
)
Settlement loss
—
—
(1,386
)
(1,386
)
($7,123
)
$3,897
($2,055
)
($5,281
)
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana
Amortization of prior service credit
$—
$559
$—
$559
Amortization of loss
(477
)
(303
)
(1
)
(781
)
($477
)
$256
($1
)
($222
)
Entergy Louisiana
Amortization of prior service credit
$—
$845
$—
$845
Amortization of loss
—
(378
)
—
(378
)
$—
$467
$—
$467
58
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
Entergy and the Registrant Subsidiaries reclassified the following costs out of accumulated other comprehensive income (before taxes and including amounts capitalized) for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014:
2015
Qualified
Pension
Costs
Other
Postretirement
Costs
Non-Qualified
Pension Costs
Total
(In Thousands)
Entergy
Amortization of prior service (cost)/credit
($778
)
$12,964
($215
)
$11,971
Amortization of loss
(25,254
)
(8,818
)
(1,104
)
(35,176
)
($26,032
)
$4,146
($1,319
)
($23,205
)
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana
Amortization of prior service (cost)/credit
$—
$2,044
($1
)
$2,043
Amortization of loss
(1,502
)
(1,954
)
(10
)
(3,466
)
($1,502
)
$90
($11
)
($1,423
)
Entergy Louisiana
Amortization of prior service credit
$—
$1,690
$—
$1,690
Amortization of loss
—
(1,604
)
—
(1,604
)
$—
$86
$—
$86
2014
Qualified
Pension
Costs
Other
Postretirement
Costs
Non-Qualified
Pension Costs
Total
(In Thousands)
Entergy
Amortization of prior service (cost)/credit
($778
)
$11,141
($210
)
$10,153
Amortization of loss
(13,468
)
(3,346
)
(1,137
)
(17,951
)
Settlement loss
—
—
(2,548
)
(2,548
)
($14,246
)
$7,795
($3,895
)
($10,346
)
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana
Amortization of prior service credit
$—
$1,118
$—
$1,118
Amortization of loss
(955
)
(606
)
(2
)
(1,563
)
($955
)
$512
($2
)
($445
)
Entergy Louisiana
Amortization of prior service credit
$—
$1,689
$—
$1,689
Amortization of loss
—
(756
)
—
(756
)
$—
$933
$—
$933
59
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
Employer Contributions
Based on current assumptions, Entergy expects to contribute
$396 million
to its qualified pension plans in 2015. As of
June 30, 2015
, Entergy had contributed
$164.2 million
to its pension plans. Based on current assumptions, the Registrant Subsidiaries expect to contribute the following to qualified pension plans for their employees in
2015
:
Entergy
Arkansas
Entergy
Gulf States
Louisiana
Entergy
Louisiana
Entergy
Mississippi
Entergy
New Orleans
Entergy
Texas
System
Energy
(In Thousands)
Expected 2015 pension contributions
$92,458
$32,471
$56,986
$22,473
$10,918
$17,167
$20,796
Pension contributions made through June 2015
$38,419
$13,207
$23,579
$9,249
$4,509
$7,042
$8,726
Remaining estimated pension contributions to be made in 2015
$54,039
$19,264
$33,407
$13,224
$6,409
$10,125
$12,070
NOTE 7. BUSINESS SEGMENT INFORMATION (Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy)
Entergy Corporation
Entergy’s reportable segments as of
June 30, 2015
are Utility and Entergy Wholesale Commodities. Utility includes the generation, transmission, distribution, and sale of electric power in portions of Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas, and natural gas utility service in portions of Louisiana. Entergy Wholesale Commodities includes the ownership, operation, and decommissioning of nuclear power plants located in the northern United States and the sale of the electric power produced by its operating plants to wholesale customers. Entergy Wholesale Commodities also includes the ownership of interests in non-nuclear power plants that sell the electric power produced by those plants to wholesale customers. “All Other” includes the parent company, Entergy Corporation, and other business activity.
Entergy’s segment financial information for the
second
quarters of
2015
and
2014
is as follows:
Utility
Entergy
Wholesale
Commodities*
All Other
Eliminations
Entergy
(In Thousands)
2015
Operating revenues
$2,273,945
$439,306
$—
($20
)
$2,713,231
Income taxes
$117,798
($3,300
)
($14,717
)
$—
$99,781
Consolidated net income (loss)
$204,035
($3,545
)
($14,870
)
($31,898
)
$153,722
2014
Operating revenues
$2,409,396
$577,891
$726
$8,637
$2,996,650
Income taxes
$122,884
$19,597
($13,738
)
$—
$128,743
Consolidated net income (loss)
$212,134
$26,463
($17,614
)
($26,702
)
$194,281
60
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
Entergy’s segment financial information for the
six months ended
June 30, 2015
and
2014
is as follows:
Utility
Entergy
Wholesale
Commodities*
All Other
Eliminations
Entergy
(In Thousands)
2015
Operating revenues
$4,551,455
$1,081,896
$—
($30
)
$5,633,321
Income taxes
$209,048
$66,891
($25,687
)
$—
$250,252
Consolidated net income (loss)
$431,786
$119,887
($31,224
)
($63,798
)
$456,651
2014
Operating revenues
$4,714,100
$1,490,013
$1,487
($107
)
$6,205,493
Income taxes
$237,947
$138,474
($30,712
)
$—
$345,709
Consolidated net income (loss)
$417,574
$268,933
($33,076
)
($53,097
)
$600,334
Businesses marked with * are sometimes referred to as the “competitive businesses.” Eliminations are primarily intersegment activity. Almost all of Entergy’s goodwill is related to the Utility segment.
Registrant Subsidiaries
Each of the Registrant Subsidiaries has one reportable segment, which is an integrated utility business, except for System Energy, which is an electricity generation business. Each of the Registrant Subsidiaries’ operations is managed on an integrated basis by that company because of the substantial effect of cost-based rates and regulatory oversight on the business process, cost structures, and operating results.
NOTE 8. RISK MANAGEMENT AND FAIR VALUES (Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy)
Market Risk
In the normal course of business, Entergy is exposed to a number of market risks. Market risk is the potential loss that Entergy may incur as a result of changes in the market or fair value of a particular commodity or instrument. All financial and commodity-related instruments, including derivatives, are subject to market risk including commodity price risk, equity price, and interest rate risk. Entergy uses derivatives primarily to mitigate commodity price risk, particularly power price and fuel price risk.
The Utility has limited exposure to the effects of market risk because it operates primarily under cost-based rate regulation. To the extent approved by their retail regulators, the Utility operating companies use derivative instruments to hedge the exposure to price volatility inherent in their purchased power, fuel, and gas purchased for resale costs that are recovered from customers.
As a wholesale generator, Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ core business is selling energy, measured in MWh, to its customers. Entergy Wholesale Commodities enters into forward contracts with its customers and also sells energy and capacity in the day ahead or spot markets. In addition to its forward physical power and gas contracts, Entergy Wholesale Commodities also uses a combination of financial contracts, including swaps, collars, and options, to mitigate commodity price risk. When the market price falls, the combination of instruments is expected to settle in gains that offset lower revenue from generation, which results in a more predictable cash flow.
61
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
Entergy’s exposure to market risk is determined by a number of factors, including the size, term, composition, and diversification of positions held, as well as market volatility and liquidity. For instruments such as options, the time period during which the option may be exercised and the relationship between the current market price of the underlying instrument and the option’s contractual strike or exercise price also affects the level of market risk. A significant factor influencing the overall level of market risk to which Entergy is exposed is its use of hedging techniques to mitigate such risk. Hedging instruments and volumes are chosen based on ability to mitigate risk associated with future energy and capacity prices; however, other considerations are factored into hedge product and volume decisions including corporate liquidity, corporate credit ratings, counterparty credit risk, hedging costs, firm settlement risk, and product availability in the marketplace. Entergy manages market risk by actively monitoring compliance with stated risk management policies as well as monitoring the effectiveness of its hedging policies and strategies. Entergy’s risk management policies limit the amount of total net exposure and rolling net exposure during the stated periods. These policies, including related risk limits, are regularly assessed to ensure their appropriateness given Entergy’s objectives.
Derivatives
Some derivative instruments are classified as cash flow hedges due to their financial settlement provisions while others are classified as normal purchase/normal sale transactions due to their physical settlement provisions. Normal purchase/normal sale risk management tools include power purchase and sales agreements, fuel purchase agreements, capacity contracts, and tolling agreements. Financially-settled cash flow hedges can include natural gas and electricity swaps and options and interest rate swaps. Entergy may enter into financially-settled swap and option contracts to manage market risk that may or may not be designated as hedging instruments.
Entergy enters into derivatives to manage natural risks inherent in its physical or financial assets or liabilities. Electricity over-the-counter instruments that financially settle against day-ahead power pool prices are used to manage price exposure for Entergy Wholesale Commodities generation. The maximum length of time over which Entergy is currently hedging the variability in future cash flows with derivatives for forecasted power transactions at
June 30, 2015
is approximately
3
years. Planned generation currently under contract from Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear power plants is
88%
for the remainder of
2015
, of which approximately
65%
is sold under financial derivatives and the remainder under normal purchase/normal sale contracts. Total planned generation for the remainder of
2015
is
18
TWh.
Entergy may use standardized master netting agreements to help mitigate the credit risk of derivative instruments. These master agreements facilitate the netting of cash flows associated with a single counterparty and may include collateral requirements. Cash, letters of credit, and parental/affiliate guarantees may be obtained as security from counterparties in order to mitigate credit risk. The collateral agreements require a counterparty to post cash or letters of credit in the event an exposure exceeds an established threshold. The threshold represents an unsecured credit limit, which may be supported by a parental/affiliate guaranty, as determined in accordance with Entergy’s credit policy. In addition, collateral agreements allow for termination and liquidity of all positions in the event of a failure or inability to post collateral.
Certain of the agreements to sell the power produced by Entergy Wholesale Commodities power plants contain provisions that require an Entergy subsidiary to provide collateral to secure its obligations when the current market prices exceed the contracted power prices. The primary form of collateral to satisfy these requirements is an Entergy Corporation guarantee. As of
June 30, 2015
, derivative contracts with one counterparty were in a liability position (approximately
$5 million
total). In addition to the corporate guarantee,
$8 million
in cash collateral was required to be posted and
$20 million
was required to be held. As of
June 30, 2014
, derivative contracts with ten counterparties were in a liability position (approximately
$93 million
total) and, in addition to the corporate guarantee,
$13 million
in cash collateral was required to be posted. If the Entergy Corporation credit rating falls below investment grade, the effect of the corporate guarantee is typically ignored and Entergy would have to post collateral equal to the estimated outstanding liability under the contract at the applicable date.
62
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
Entergy manages fuel price volatility for its Louisiana jurisdictions (Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, and Entergy New Orleans) and Entergy Mississippi through the purchase of short-term natural gas swaps that financially settle against NYMEX futures. These swaps are marked-to-market through fuel expense with offsetting regulatory assets or liabilities. All benefits or costs of the program are recorded in fuel costs. The notional volumes of these swaps are based on a portion of projected annual exposure to gas for electric generation and projected winter purchases for gas distribution at Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy New Orleans. The total volume of natural gas swaps outstanding as of
June 30, 2015
is
27,620,000
MMBtu for Entergy,
10,870,000
MMBtu for Entergy Gulf States Louisiana,
11,820,000
MMBtu for Entergy Louisiana,
4,630,000
MMBtu for Entergy Mississippi, and
300,000
MMBtu for Entergy New Orleans. Credit support for these natural gas swaps is covered by master agreements that do not require collateralization based on mark-to-market value, but do carry adequate assurance language that may lead to collateralization requests.
During the second quarter 2015, Entergy participated in the annual FTR auction process for the MISO planning year of June 1, 2015 through May 31, 2016. FTRs are derivative instruments which represent economic hedges of future congestion charges that will be incurred in serving Entergy’s customer load. They are not designated as hedging instruments. Entergy initially records FTRs at their estimated fair value and subsequently adjusts the carrying value to their estimated fair value at the end of each accounting period prior to settlement. Unrealized gains or losses on FTRs held by Entergy Wholesale Commodities are included in operating revenues. The Utility operating companies recognize regulatory liabilities or assets for unrealized gains or losses on FTRs. The total volume of FTRs outstanding as of
June 30, 2015
is 106,735 GWh for Entergy, including 21,817 GWh for Entergy Arkansas, 19,918 GWh for Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, 27,839 GWh for Entergy Louisiana, 15,560 GWh for Entergy Mississippi, 7,718 GWh for Entergy New Orleans, and 11,647 GWh for Entergy Texas. Credit support for FTRs held by the Utility operating companies is covered by cash and/or letters of credit issued by each Utility operating company as required by MISO. Credit support for FTRs held by Entergy Wholesale Commodities is covered by cash.
63
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
The fair values of Entergy’s derivative instruments in the consolidated balance sheet as of
June 30, 2015
are shown in the table below. Certain investments, including those not designated as hedging instruments, are subject to master netting arrangements and are presented in the balance sheet on a net basis in accordance with accounting guidance for derivatives and hedging.
Instrument
Balance Sheet Location
Fair Value (a)
Offset (b)
Net (c) (d)
Business
(In Millions)
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments
Assets:
Electricity swaps and options
Prepayments and other (current portion)
$160
($49)
$111
Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Electricity swaps and options
Other deferred debits and other assets (non-current portion)
$47
$—
$47
Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Liabilities:
Electricity swaps and options
Other current liabilities
(current portion)
$10
($10)
$—
Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
Assets:
Electricity swaps and options
Prepayments and other (current portion)
$62
($11)
$51
Entergy Wholesale Commodities
FTRs
Prepayments and other
$68
($1)
$67
Utility and Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Liabilities:
Electricity swaps and options
Other current liabilities(current portion)
$54
($49)
$5
Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Natural gas swaps
Other current liabilities
$9
$—
$9
Utility
64
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
The fair values of Entergy’s derivative instruments in the consolidated balance sheet as of
December 31, 2014
are shown in the table below. Certain investments, including those not designated as hedging instruments, are subject to master netting arrangements and are presented in the balance sheet on a net basis in accordance with accounting guidance for derivatives and hedging.
Instrument
Balance Sheet Location
Fair Value (a)
Offset (b)
Net (c) (d)
Business
(In Millions)
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments
Assets:
Electricity swaps and options
Prepayments and other (current portion)
$149
($53)
$96
Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Electricity swaps and options
Other deferred debits and other assets (non-current portion)
$48
$—
$48
Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Liabilities:
Electricity swaps and options
Other current liabilities (current portion)
$24
($24)
$—
Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
Assets:
Electricity swaps and options
Prepayments and other (current portion)
$97
($25)
$72
Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Electricity swaps and options
Other deferred debits and other assets (non-current portion)
$9
($8)
$1
Entergy Wholesale Commodities
FTRs
Prepayments and other
$50
($3)
$47
Utility and Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Liabilities:
Electricity swaps and options
Other current liabilities (current portion)
$57
($55)
$2
Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Electricity swaps and options
Other non-current liabilities (non-current portion)
$8
($8)
$—
Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Natural gas swaps
Other current liabilities
$20
$—
$20
Utility
(a)
Represents the gross amounts of recognized assets/liabilities
(b)
Represents the netting of fair value balances with the same counterparty
(c)
Represents the net amounts of assets /liabilities presented on the Entergy Consolidated Balance Sheets
(d)
Excludes cash collateral in the amounts of
$7 million
posted and
$19 million
held as of
June 30, 2015
and
$25 million
held as of
December 31, 2014
. Also excludes letters of credit in the amount of
$1 million
posted and
$1 million
held as of June 30, 2015.
65
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
The effect of Entergy’s derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges on the consolidated income statements for the three months ended
June 30, 2015
and
2014
is as follows:
Instrument
Amount of gain (loss)
recognized in other
comprehensive income
Income Statement location
Amount of gain
reclassified from
AOCI into income (a)
(In Millions)
(In Millions)
2015
Electricity swaps and options
$137
Competitive businesses operating revenues
$78
2014
Electricity swaps and options
($11)
Competitive businesses operating revenues
($1)
(a) Before taxes of
$27 million
for the three months ended June 30, 2015
The effect of Entergy’s derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges on the consolidated income statements for the six months ended
June 30, 2015
and
2014
is as follows:
Instrument
Amount of gain (loss) recognized in other
comprehensive income
Income Statement location
Amount of gain (loss)
reclassified from
AOCI into income (a)
(In Millions)
(In Millions)
2015
Electricity swaps and options
$105
Competitive businesses operating revenues
$91
2014
Electricity swaps and options
($185)
Competitive businesses operating revenues
($195)
(a)
Before taxes (benefit) of
$32 million
and
($68) million
for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively
At each reporting period, Entergy measures its hedges for ineffectiveness. Any ineffectiveness is recognized in earnings during the period. The ineffective portion of cash flow hedges is recorded in competitive business operating revenues. The change in fair value of Entergy’s cash flow hedges due to ineffectiveness during the
three months ended June 30, 2015
and
2014
was
$2 million
and
$0.8 million
, respectively. The change in fair value of Entergy’s cash flow hedges due to ineffectiveness during the
six months ended June 30, 2015
and
2014
was
$1 million
and
$1.8 million
, respectively.
Based on market prices as of
June 30, 2015
, unrealized gains (losses) recorded in AOCI on cash flow hedges relating to power sales totaled
$170 million
of net unrealized gains (losses). Approximately
$131 million
is expected to be reclassified from AOCI to operating revenues in the next twelve months. The actual amount reclassified from AOCI, however, could vary due to future changes in market prices.
Entergy may effectively liquidate a cash flow hedge instrument by entering into a contract offsetting the original hedge, and then de-designating the original hedge in this situation. Gains or losses accumulated in other comprehensive
66
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
income prior to de-designation continue to be deferred in other comprehensive income until they are included in income as the original hedged transaction occurs. From the point of de-designation, the gains or losses on the original hedge and the offsetting contract are recorded as assets or liabilities on the balance sheet and offset as they flow through to earnings.
The effect of Entergy’s derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments on the consolidated income statements for the three months ended
June 30, 2015
and
2014
is as follows:
Instrument
Amount of loss
recognized in AOCI
Income Statement
location
Amount of gain (loss)
recorded in the income statement
(In Millions)
(In Millions)
2015
Natural gas swaps
—
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
(a)
$3
FTRs
—
Purchased power expense
(b)
$46
Electricity swaps and options de-designated as hedged items
($3)
Competitive business operating revenues
($5)
2014
Natural gas swaps
—
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
(a)
$4
FTRs
—
Purchased power expense
(b)
$89
Electricity swaps and options de-designated as hedged items
($14)
Competitive business operating revenues
$4
The effect of Entergy’s derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments on the consolidated income statements for the six months ended
June 30, 2015
and
2014
is as follows:
Instrument
Amount of gain recognized in AOCI
Income Statement
location
Amount of gain (loss)
recorded in the income statement
(In Millions)
(In Millions)
2015
Natural gas swaps
—
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
(a)
($16)
FTRs
—
Purchased power expense
(b)
$79
Electricity swaps and options de-designated as hedged items
$1
Competitive business operating revenues
($39)
2014
Natural gas swaps
—
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
(a)
$21
FTRs
—
Purchased power expense
(b)
$135
Electricity swaps and options de-designated as hedged items
$7
Competitive business operating revenues
$25
67
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
(a)
Due to regulatory treatment, the natural gas swaps are marked-to-market through fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale and then such amounts are simultaneously reversed and recorded as an offsetting regulatory asset or liability. The gains or losses recorded as fuel expenses when the swaps are settled are recovered or refunded through fuel cost recovery mechanisms.
(b)
Due to regulatory treatment, the changes in the estimated fair value of FTRs for the Utility operating companies are recorded through purchased power expense and then such amounts are simultaneously reversed and recorded as an offsetting regulatory asset or liability. The gains or losses are recorded as purchased power expense when the FTRs for the Utility operating companies settle and are recovered or refunded through fuel cost recovery mechanisms.
The fair values of the Registrant Subsidiaries’ derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments on their balance sheets as of
June 30, 2015
are as follows:
Instrument
Balance Sheet Location
Fair Value (a)
Registrant
(In Millions)
Assets:
FTRs
Prepayments and other
$9.1
Entergy Arkansas
FTRs
Prepayments and other
$17.8
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana
FTRs
Prepayments and other
$19.5
Entergy Louisiana
FTRs
Prepayments and other
$4.9
Entergy Mississippi
FTRs
Prepayments and other
$6.7
Entergy New Orleans
FTRs
Prepayments and other
$7.9
Entergy Texas
Liabilities:
Natural gas swaps
Other current liabilities
$3.2
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana
Natural gas swaps
Other current liabilities
$3.8
Entergy Louisiana
Natural gas swaps
Other current liabilities
$1.5
Entergy Mississippi
The fair values of the Registrant Subsidiaries’ derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments on their balance sheets as of
December 31, 2014
are as follows:
Instrument
Balance Sheet Location
Fair Value (a)
Registrant
(In Millions)
Assets:
FTRs
Prepayments and other
$0.7
Entergy Arkansas
FTRs
Prepayments and other
$14.4
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana
FTRs
Prepayments and other
$11.1
Entergy Louisiana
FTRs
Prepayments and other
$3.4
Entergy Mississippi
FTRs
Prepayments and other
$4.1
Entergy New Orleans
FTRs
Prepayments and other
$12.3
Entergy Texas
Liabilities:
Natural gas swaps
Other current liabilities
$8.2
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana
Natural gas swaps
Other current liabilities
$7.6
Entergy Louisiana
Natural gas swaps
Other current liabilities
$2.8
Entergy Mississippi
Natural gas swaps
Other current liabilities
$0.9
Entergy New Orleans
(a)
Excludes letters of credit in the amount of
$0.6 million
posted by Entergy Texas as of June 30, 2015. No cash collateral was required to be posted as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014.
68
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
The effects of the Registrant Subsidiaries’ derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments on their income statements for the three months ended
June 30, 2015
and
2014
are as follows:
Instrument
Income Statement Location
Amount of gain
recorded
in the income statement
Registrant
(In Millions)
2015
Natural gas swaps
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
$0.7
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana
Natural gas swaps
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
$1.8
Entergy Louisiana
Natural gas swaps
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
$0.6
Entergy Mississippi
FTRs
Purchased power expense
$19.6
Entergy Arkansas
FTRs
Purchased power expense
$8.7
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana
FTRs
Purchased power expense
$8.6
Entergy Louisiana
FTRs
Purchased power expense
$3.9
Entergy Mississippi
FTRs
Purchased power expense
$4.5
Entergy New Orleans
FTRs
Purchased power expense
$1.2
Entergy Texas
2014
Natural gas swaps
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
$1.4
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana
Natural gas swaps
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
$2.2
Entergy Louisiana
Natural gas swaps
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
$0.6
Entergy Mississippi
FTRs
Purchased power expense
$6.7
Entergy Arkansas
FTRs
Purchased power expense
$26.1
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana
FTRs
Purchased power expense
$12.4
Entergy Louisiana
FTRs
Purchased power expense
$4.5
Entergy Mississippi
FTRs
Purchased power expense
$3.3
Entergy New Orleans
FTRs
Purchased power expense
$33.4
Entergy Texas
69
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
The effects of the Registrant Subsidiaries’ derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments on their income statements for the six months ended
June 30, 2015
and
2014
are as follows:
Instrument
Income Statement Location
Amount of gain
(loss) recorded
in the income statement
Registrant
(In Millions)
2015
Natural gas swaps
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
($7.2)
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana
Natural gas swaps
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
($6.3)
Entergy Louisiana
Natural gas swaps
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
($2.4)
Entergy Mississippi
Natural gas swaps
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
($0.5)
Entergy New Orleans
FTRs
Purchased power expense
$34.7
Entergy Arkansas
FTRs
Purchased power expense
$16.1
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana
FTRs
Purchased power expense
$15.6
Entergy Louisiana
FTRs
Purchased power expense
$7.2
Entergy Mississippi
FTRs
Purchased power expense
$6.0
Entergy New Orleans
FTRs
Purchased power expense
($0.2)
Entergy Texas
2014
Natural gas swaps
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
$8.2
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana
Natural gas swaps
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
$10.2
Entergy Louisiana
Natural gas swaps
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
$2.2
Entergy Mississippi
Natural gas swaps
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
$0.7
Entergy New Orleans
FTRs
Purchased power expense
$11.8
Entergy Arkansas
FTRs
Purchased power expense
$35.1
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana
FTRs
Purchased power expense
$20.4
Entergy Louisiana
FTRs
Purchased power expense
$12.3
Entergy Mississippi
FTRs
Purchased power expense
$6.3
Entergy New Orleans
FTRs
Purchased power expense
$46.2
Entergy Texas
Fair Values
The estimated fair values of Entergy’s financial instruments and derivatives are determined using historical prices, bid prices, market quotes, and financial modeling. Considerable judgment is required in developing the estimates of fair value. Therefore, estimates are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that Entergy could realize in a current market exchange. Gains or losses realized on financial instruments other than those instruments held by the Entergy Wholesale Commodities business are reflected in future rates and therefore do not affect net income. Entergy considers
70
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
the carrying amounts of most financial instruments classified as current assets and liabilities to be a reasonable estimate of their fair value because of the short maturity of these instruments.
Accounting standards define fair value as an exit price, or the price that would be received to sell an asset or the amount that would be paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between knowledgeable market participants at the date of measurement. Entergy and the Registrant Subsidiaries use assumptions or market input data that market participants would use in pricing assets or liabilities at fair value. The inputs can be readily observable, corroborated by market data, or generally unobservable. Entergy and the Registrant Subsidiaries endeavor to use the best available information to determine fair value.
Accounting standards establish a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. The hierarchy establishes the highest priority for unadjusted market quotes in an active market for the identical asset or liability and the lowest priority for unobservable inputs. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are:
•
Level 1 - Level 1 inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the entity has the ability to access at the measurement date. Active markets are those in which transactions for the asset or liability occur in sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis. Level 1 primarily consists of individually owned common stocks, cash equivalents (temporary cash investments, securitization recovery trust account, and escrow accounts), debt instruments, and gas hedge contracts. Cash equivalents includes all unrestricted highly liquid debt instruments with an original maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase.
•
Level 2 - Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are, either directly or indirectly, observable for the asset or liability at the measurement date. Assets are valued based on prices derived by independent third parties that use inputs such as benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes, and issuer spreads. Prices are reviewed and can be challenged with the independent parties and/or overridden by Entergy if it is believed such would be more reflective of fair value. Level 2 inputs include the following:
- quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets;
- quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in inactive markets;
- inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability; or
-
inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.
Level 2 consists primarily of individually-owned debt instruments or shares in common trusts. Common trust funds are stated at estimated fair value based on the fair market value of the underlying investments.
•
Level 3 - Level 3 inputs are pricing inputs that are generally less observable or unobservable from objective sources. These inputs are used with internally developed methodologies to produce management’s best estimate of fair value for the asset or liability. Level 3 consists primarily of FTRs and derivative power contracts used as cash flow hedges of power sales at merchant power plants.
The values for power contract assets or liabilities are based on both observable inputs including public market prices and interest rates, and unobservable inputs such as implied volatilities, unit contingent discounts, expected basis differences, and credit adjusted counterparty interest rates. They are classified as Level 3 assets and liabilities. The valuations of these assets and liabilities are performed by the Entergy Wholesale Commodities Risk Control group and the Entergy Wholesale Commodities Accounting Policy and External Reporting group. The primary functions of the Entergy Wholesale Commodities Risk Control group include: gathering, validating and reporting market data, providing market risk analyses and valuations in support of Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ commercial transactions, developing and administering protocols for the management of market risks, and implementing and maintaining controls around changes to market data in the energy trading and risk management system. The Risk Control group is also
71
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
responsible for managing the energy trading and risk management system, forecasting revenues, forward positions and analysis. The Entergy Wholesale Commodities Accounting Policy and External Reporting group performs functions related to market and counterparty settlements, revenue reporting and analysis and financial accounting. The Entergy Wholesale Commodities Risk Control group reports to the Vice President and Treasurer while the Entergy Wholesale Commodities Accounting Policy and External Reporting group reports to the Vice President, Accounting Policy and External Reporting.
The amounts reflected as the fair value of electricity swaps are based on the estimated amount that the contracts are in-the-money at the balance sheet date (treated as an asset) or out-of-the-money at the balance sheet date (treated as a liability) and would equal the estimated amount receivable to or payable by Entergy if the contracts were settled at that date. These derivative contracts include cash flow hedges that swap fixed for floating cash flows for sales of the output from the Entergy Wholesale Commodities business. The fair values are based on the mark-to-market comparison between the fixed contract prices and the floating prices determined each period from quoted forward power market prices. The differences between the fixed price in the swap contract and these market-related prices multiplied by the volume specified in the contract and discounted at the counterparties’ credit adjusted risk free rate are recorded as derivative contract assets or liabilities. For contracts that have unit contingent terms, a further discount is applied based on the historical relationship between contract and market prices for similar contract terms.
The amounts reflected as the fair values of electricity options are valued based on a Black Scholes model, and are calculated at the end of each month for accounting purposes. Inputs to the valuation include end of day forward market prices for the period when the transactions will settle, implied volatilities based on market volatilities provided by a third party data aggregator, and US Treasury rates for a risk-free return rate. As described further below, prices and implied volatilities are reviewed and can be adjusted if it is determined that there is a better representation of fair value.
On a daily basis, Entergy Wholesale Commodities Risk Control group calculates the mark-to-market for electricity swaps and options. Entergy Wholesale Commodities Risk Control group also validates forward market prices by comparing them to other sources of forward market prices or to settlement prices of actual market transactions. Significant differences are analyzed and potentially adjusted based on these other sources of forward market prices or settlement prices of actual market transactions. Implied volatilities used to value options are also validated using actual counterparty quotes for Entergy Wholesale Commodities transactions when available, and uses multiple sources of market implied volatilities. Moreover, on at least a monthly basis, the Office of Corporate Risk Oversight confirms the mark-to-market calculations and prepares price scenarios and credit downgrade scenario analysis. The scenario analysis is communicated to senior management within Entergy and within Entergy Wholesale Commodities. Finally, for all proposed derivative transactions, an analysis is completed to assess the risk of adding the proposed derivative to Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ portfolio. In particular, the credit and liquidity effects are calculated for this analysis. This analysis is communicated to senior management within Entergy and Entergy Wholesale Commodities.
The values of FTRs are based on unobservable inputs, including estimates of future congestion costs in MISO between applicable generation and load pricing nodes based on prices published by MISO. They are classified as Level 3 assets and liabilities. The valuations of these assets and liabilities are performed by the Entergy Wholesale Commodities Risk Control group for the unregulated business and by the System Planning and Operations Risk Control group for the Utility operating companies. Entergy’s Accounting Policy group reviews these valuations for reasonableness, with the assistance of others within the organization with knowledge of the various inputs and assumptions used in the valuation. The System Planning and Operations Risk Control group reports to the Vice President and Treasurer. The Accounting Policy group reports to the Vice President, Accounting Policy and External Reporting.
72
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
The following tables set forth, by level within the fair value hierarchy, Entergy’s assets and liabilities that are accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of
June 30, 2015
and
December 31, 2014
. The assessment of the significance of a particular input to a fair value measurement requires judgment and may affect their placement within the fair value hierarchy levels.
2015
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
(In Millions)
Assets:
Temporary cash investments
$850
$—
$—
$850
Decommissioning trust funds (a):
Equity securities
478
2,796
—
3,274
Debt securities
891
1,224
—
2,115
Power contracts
—
—
209
209
Securitization recovery trust account
38
—
—
38
Escrow accounts
366
—
—
366
FTRs
—
—
67
67
$2,623
$4,020
$276
$6,919
Liabilities:
Power contracts
$—
$—
$5
$5
Gas hedge contracts
9
—
—
9
$9
$—
$5
$14
2014
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
(In Millions)
Assets:
Temporary cash investments
$1,291
$—
$—
$1,291
Decommissioning trust funds (a):
Equity securities
452
2,834
—
3,286
Debt securities
880
1,205
—
2,085
Power contracts
—
—
217
217
Securitization recovery trust account
44
—
—
44
Escrow accounts
362
—
—
362
FTRs
—
—
47
47
$3,029
$4,039
$264
$7,332
Liabilities:
Power contracts
$—
$—
$2
$2
Gas hedge contracts
20
—
—
20
$20
$—
$2
$22
(a)
The decommissioning trust funds hold equity and fixed income securities. Equity securities are held to approximate the returns of major market indices. Fixed income investments are held in various governmental and corporate securities. See Note 9 to the financial statements herein for additional information on the investment portfolios.
73
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
The following table sets forth a reconciliation of changes in the net assets (liabilities) for the fair value of derivatives classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy for the
three months ended June 30, 2015
and
2014
:
2015
2014
Power Contracts
FTRs
Power Contracts
FTRs
(In Millions)
Balance as of April 1,
$145
$15
($86
)
$25
Total gains (losses) for the period (a)
Included in earnings
22
—
6
—
Included in OCI
131
—
(57
)
—
Included as a regulatory liability/asset
—
18
—
86
Issuances of FTRs
—
80
—
121
Purchases
4
—
3
—
Settlements
(98
)
(46
)
46
(88
)
Balance as of June 30,
$204
$67
($88
)
$144
(a)
Change in unrealized gains or losses for the period included in earnings for derivatives held at the end of the reporting period is
($1) million
for the three months ended June 30, 2015 and
$34 million
for the three months ended June 30, 2014
The following table sets forth a reconciliation of changes in the net assets (liabilities) for the fair value of derivatives classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy for the
six months ended
June 30, 2015
and
2014
:
2015
2014
Power Contracts
FTRs
Power Contracts
FTRs
(In Millions)
Balance as of January 1,
$215
$47
($133
)
$34
Total gains (losses) for the period (a)
Included in earnings
(13
)
(1
)
27
—
Included in OCI
105
—
(219
)
—
Included as a regulatory liability/asset
—
20
—
123
Issuances of FTRs
—
80
—
121
Purchases
14
—
8
—
Settlements
(117
)
(79
)
229
(134
)
Balance as of June 30,
$204
$67
($88
)
$144
(a)
Change in unrealized gains or losses for the period included in earnings for derivatives held at the end of the reporting period is
($7) million
for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and
$86 million
for the six months ended June 30, 2014
74
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
The
following
table sets forth a description of the types of transactions classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy and significant unobservable inputs to each which cause that classification as of
June 30, 2015
:
Transaction Type
Fair Value
as of
June 30,
2015
Significant
Unobservable Inputs
Range
from
Average
%
Effect on
Fair Value
(In Millions)
(In Millions)
Electricity swaps
$135
Unit contingent discount
+/-
3%
$8
Electricity options
$69
Implied volatility
+/-
63%
$40
The following table sets forth an analysis of each of the types of unobservable inputs impacting the fair value of items classified as Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy, and the sensitivity to changes to those inputs:
Significant
Unobservable
Input
Transaction Type
Position
Change to Input
Effect on
Fair Value
Unit contingent discount
Electricity swaps
Sell
Increase (Decrease)
Decrease (Increase)
Implied volatility
Electricity options
Sell
Increase (Decrease)
Increase (Decrease)
Implied volatility
Electricity options
Buy
Increase (Decrease)
Increase (Decrease)
The following table sets forth, by level within the fair value hierarchy, the Registrant Subsidiaries’ assets that are accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of
June 30, 2015
and
December 31, 2014
. The assessment of the significance of a particular input to a fair value measurement requires judgment and may affect its placement within the fair value hierarchy levels.
Entergy Arkansas
2015
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
(In Millions)
Assets:
Temporary cash investments
$90.6
$—
$—
$90.6
Decommissioning trust funds (a):
Equity securities
2.8
472.3
—
475.1
Debt securities
104.9
196.7
—
301.6
Securitization recovery trust account
4.2
—
—
4.2
Escrow accounts
12.2
—
—
12.2
FTRs
—
—
9.1
9.1
$214.7
$669.0
$9.1
$892.8
2014
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
(In Millions)
Assets:
Temporary cash investments
$208.0
$—
$—
$208.0
Decommissioning trust funds (a):
Equity securities
7.2
480.1
—
487.3
Debt securities
72.2
210.4
—
282.6
Securitization recovery trust account
4.1
—
—
4.1
Escrow accounts
12.2
—
—
12.2
FTRs
—
—
0.7
0.7
$303.7
$690.5
$0.7
$994.9
75
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana
2015
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
(In Millions)
Assets:
Temporary cash investments
$77.3
$—
$—
$77.3
Decommissioning trust funds (a):
Equity securities
12.3
391.0
—
403.3
Debt securities
77.3
164.0
—
241.3
Escrow accounts
90.1
—
—
90.1
FTRs
—
—
17.8
17.8
$257.0
$555.0
$17.8
$829.8
Liabilities:
Gas hedge contracts
$3.2
$—
$—
$3.2
2014
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
(In Millions)
Assets:
Temporary cash investments
$109.6
$—
$—
$109.6
Decommissioning trust funds (a):
Equity securities
10.5
385.4
—
395.9
Debt securities
81.9
159.9
—
241.8
Escrow accounts
90.1
—
—
90.1
FTRs
—
—
14.4
14.4
$292.1
$545.3
$14.4
$851.8
Liabilities:
Gas hedge contracts
$8.2
$—
$—
$8.2
Entergy Louisiana
2015
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
(In Millions)
Assets:
Temporary cash investments
$215.3
$—
$—
$215.3
Decommissioning trust funds (a):
Equity securities
5.1
238.4
—
243.5
Debt securities
67.7
79.0
—
146.7
Escrow accounts
200.1
—
—
200.1
Securitization recovery trust account
3.1
—
—
3.1
FTRs
—
—
19.5
19.5
$491.3
$317.4
$19.5
$828.2
Liabilities:
Gas hedge contracts
$3.8
$—
$—
$3.8
76
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
2014
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
(In Millions)
Assets:
Temporary cash investments
$157.1
$—
$—
$157.1
Decommissioning trust funds (a):
Equity securities
4.8
234.8
—
239.6
Debt securities
68.7
75.3
—
144.0
Escrow accounts
200.1
—
—
200.1
Securitization recovery trust account
3.1
—
—
3.1
FTRs
—
—
11.1
11.1
$433.8
$310.1
$11.1
$755.0
Liabilities:
Gas hedge contracts
$7.6
$—
$—
$7.6
Entergy Mississippi
2015
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
(In Millions)
Assets:
Temporary cash investments
$113.3
$—
$—
$113.3
Escrow accounts
41.8
—
—
41.8
FTRs
—
—
4.9
4.9
$155.1
$—
$4.9
$160.0
Liabilities:
Gas hedge contracts
$1.5
$—
$—
$1.5
2014
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
(In Millions)
Assets:
Temporary cash investments
$60.4
$—
$—
$60.4
Escrow accounts
41.8
—
—
41.8
FTRs
—
—
3.4
3.4
$102.2
$—
$3.4
$105.6
Liabilities:
Gas hedge contracts
$2.8
$—
$—
$2.8
Entergy New Orleans
2015
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
(In Millions)
Assets:
Temporary cash investments
$28.5
$—
$—
$28.5
Escrow accounts
21.6
—
—
21.6
FTRs
—
—
6.7
6.7
$50.1
$—
$6.7
$56.8
77
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
2014
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
(In Millions)
Assets:
Temporary cash investments
$41.4
$—
$—
$41.4
Escrow accounts
18.0
—
—
18.0
FTRs
—
—
4.1
4.1
$59.4
$—
$4.1
$63.5
Liabilities:
Gas hedge contracts
$0.9
$—
$—
$0.9
Entergy Texas
2015
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
(In Millions)
Assets
:
Temporary cash investments
$33.1
$—
$—
$33.1
Securitization recovery trust account
30.5
—
—
30.5
FTRs
—
—
7.9
7.9
$63.6
$—
$7.9
$71.5
2014
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
(In Millions)
Assets
:
Temporary cash investments
$28.7
$—
$—
$28.7
Securitization recovery trust account
37.2
—
—
37.2
FTRs
—
—
12.3
12.3
$65.9
$—
$12.3
$78.2
System Energy
2015
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
(In Millions)
Assets:
Temporary cash investments
$110.1
$—
$—
$110.1
Decommissioning trust funds (a):
Equity securities
4.7
429.1
—
433.8
Debt securities
206.6
56.9
—
263.5
$321.4
$486.0
$—
$807.4
2014
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
(In Millions)
Assets:
Temporary cash investments
$222.4
$—
$—
$222.4
Decommissioning trust funds (a):
Equity securities
2.0
422.5
—
424.5
Debt securities
194.2
61.1
—
255.3
$418.6
$483.6
$—
$902.2
78
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
(a)
The decommissioning trust funds hold equity and fixed income securities. Equity securities are held to approximate the returns of major market indices. Fixed income investments are held in various governmental and corporate securities. See Note 9 to the financial statements herein for additional information on the investment portfolios.
The following table sets forth a reconciliation of changes in the net assets (liabilities) for the fair value of derivatives classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy for the
three months ended June 30, 2015
.
Entergy
Arkansas
Entergy
Gulf States
Louisiana
Entergy
Louisiana
Entergy
Mississippi
Entergy
New
Orleans
Entergy
Texas
(In Millions)
Balance as of April 1,
$0.6
$5.0
$3.8
$0.9
$1.4
$3.4
Issuances of FTRs
7.0
26.7
21.5
5.4
7.3
11.4
Gains (losses) included as a regulatory liability/asset
21.1
(5.2
)
2.8
2.5
2.5
(5.7
)
Settlements
(19.6
)
(8.7
)
(8.6
)
(3.9
)
(4.5
)
(1.2
)
Balance as of June 30,
$9.1
$17.8
$19.5
$4.9
$6.7
$7.9
The following table sets forth a reconciliation of changes in the net assets (liabilities) for the fair value of derivatives classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy for the
three months ended
June 30, 2014
.
Entergy
Arkansas
Entergy
Gulf States
Louisiana
Entergy
Louisiana
Entergy
Mississippi
Entergy
New
Orleans
Entergy
Texas
(In Millions)
Balance as of April 1,
$2.7
$5.4
$3.0
$4.8
$1.0
$7.4
Issuances of FTRs
4.2
37.3
21.5
15.2
8.3
33.2
Gains (losses) included as a regulatory liability/asset
2.8
30.6
11.5
(2.8
)
2.5
40.6
Settlements
(6.7
)
(26.1
)
(12.4
)
(4.5
)
(3.3
)
(33.4
)
Balance as of June 30,
$3.0
$47.2
$23.6
$12.7
$8.5
$47.8
The following table sets forth a reconciliation of changes in the net assets (liabilities) for the fair value of derivatives classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy for the
six months ended June 30, 2015
.
Entergy
Arkansas
Entergy
Gulf States
Louisiana
Entergy
Louisiana
Entergy
Mississippi
Entergy
New
Orleans
Entergy
Texas
(In Millions)
Balance as of January 1,
$0.7
$14.4
$11.1
$3.4
$4.1
$12.3
Issuances of FTRs
7.0
26.7
21.5
5.4
7.3
11.4
Gains (losses) included as a regulatory liability/asset
36.1
(7.2
)
2.5
3.3
1.3
(16.0
)
Settlements
(34.7
)
(16.1
)
(15.6
)
(7.2
)
(6.0
)
0.2
Balance as of June 30,
$9.1
$17.8
$19.5
$4.9
$6.7
$7.9
79
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
The following table sets forth a reconciliation of changes in the net assets (liabilities) for the fair value of derivatives classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy for the
six months ended June 30, 2014
.
Entergy
Arkansas
Entergy
Gulf States
Louisiana
Entergy
Louisiana
Entergy
Mississippi
Entergy
New
Orleans
Entergy
Texas
(In Millions)
Balance as of January 1,
$—
$6.7
$5.7
$1.0
$2.0
$18.4
Issuances of FTRs
4.2
37.3
21.5
15.2
8.3
33.2
Gains (losses) included as a regulatory liability/asset
10.6
38.3
16.8
8.8
4.5
42.4
Settlements
(11.8
)
(35.1
)
(20.4
)
(12.3
)
(6.3
)
(46.2
)
Balance as of June 30,
$3.0
$47.2
$23.6
$12.7
$8.5
$47.8
NOTE 9. DECOMMISSIONING TRUST FUNDS (Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, and System Energy)
Entergy holds debt and equity securities, classified as available-for-sale, in nuclear decommissioning trust accounts. The NRC requires Entergy subsidiaries to maintain trusts to fund the costs of decommissioning ANO 1, ANO 2, River Bend, Waterford 3, Grand Gulf, Pilgrim, Indian Point 1 and 2, Vermont Yankee, and Palisades (NYPA currently retains the decommissioning trusts and liabilities for Indian Point 3 and FitzPatrick). The funds are invested primarily in equity securities, fixed-rate debt securities, and cash and cash equivalents.
Entergy records decommissioning trust funds on the balance sheet at their fair value. Because of the ability of the Registrant Subsidiaries to recover decommissioning costs in rates and in accordance with the regulatory treatment for decommissioning trust funds, the Registrant Subsidiaries have recorded an offsetting amount of unrealized gains/(losses) on investment securities in other regulatory liabilities/assets. For the 30% interest in River Bend formerly owned by Cajun, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana has recorded an offsetting amount of unrealized gains/(losses) in other deferred credits. Decommissioning trust funds for Pilgrim, Indian Point 1 and 2, Vermont Yankee, and Palisades do not meet the criteria for regulatory accounting treatment. Accordingly, unrealized gains recorded on the assets in these trust funds are recognized in the accumulated other comprehensive income component of shareholders’ equity because these assets are classified as available-for-sale. Unrealized losses (where cost exceeds fair market value) on the assets in these trust funds are also recorded in the accumulated other comprehensive income component of shareholders’ equity unless the unrealized loss is other than temporary and therefore recorded in earnings. Generally, Entergy records realized gains and losses on its debt and equity securities using the specific identification method to determine the cost basis of its securities.
The securities held as of
June 30, 2015
and
December 31, 2014
are summarized as follows:
Fair
Value
Total
Unrealized
Gains
Total
Unrealized
Losses
(In Millions)
2015
Equity Securities
$3,274
$1,482
$1
Debt Securities
2,115
51
18
Total
$5,389
$1,533
$19
80
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
Fair
Value
Total
Unrealized
Gains
Total
Unrealized
Losses
(In Millions)
2014
Equity Securities
$3,286
$1,513
$1
Debt Securities
2,085
76
6
Total
$5,371
$1,589
$7
Deferred taxes on unrealized gains/(losses) are recorded in other comprehensive income for the decommissioning trusts which do not meet the criteria for regulatory accounting treatment as described above. Unrealized gains/(losses) above are reported before deferred taxes of
$369 million
and
$396 million
as of
June 30, 2015
and
December 31, 2014
, respectively. The amortized cost of debt securities was
$2,096 million
as of
June 30, 2015
and
$2,019 million
as of
December 31, 2014
. As of
June 30, 2015
, the debt securities have an average coupon rate of approximately
3.33%
, an average duration of approximately
5.84
years, and an average maturity of approximately
8.82
years. The equity securities are generally held in funds that are designed to approximate or somewhat exceed the return of the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index. A relatively small percentage of the equity securities are held in funds intended to replicate the return of the Wilshire 4500 Index or the Russell 3000 Index.
The fair value and gross unrealized losses of available-for-sale equity and debt securities, summarized by investment type and length of time that the securities have been in a continuous loss position, are as follows as of
June 30, 2015
:
Equity Securities
Debt Securities
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
(In Millions)
Less than 12 months
$24
$1
$689
$15
More than 12 months
—
—
76
3
Total
$24
$1
$765
$18
The fair value and gross unrealized losses of available-for-sale equity and debt securities, summarized by investment type and length of time that the securities have been in a continuous loss position, are as follows as of
December 31, 2014
:
Equity Securities
Debt Securities
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
(In Millions)
Less than 12 months
$9
$1
$277
$2
More than 12 months
—
—
163
4
Total
$9
$1
$440
$6
81
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
The fair value of debt securities, summarized by contractual maturities, as of
June 30, 2015
and
December 31, 2014
are as follows:
2015
2014
(In Millions)
less than 1 year
$64
$94
1 year - 5 years
792
783
5 years - 10 years
693
681
10 years - 15 years
174
173
15 years - 20 years
68
79
20 years+
324
275
Total
$2,115
$2,085
During the
three months ended
June 30, 2015
and
2014
, proceeds from the dispositions of securities amounted to
$456 million
and
$445 million
, respectively. During the
three months ended
June 30, 2015
and
2014
, gross gains of
$19 million
and
$6 million
, respectively, and gross losses of
$1 million
and
$1 million
, respectively, were reclassified out of other comprehensive income or other regulatory liabilities/assets into earnings.
During the
six months ended
June 30, 2015
and
2014
, proceeds from the dispositions of securities amounted to
$949 million
and
$982 million
, respectively. During the
six months ended
June 30, 2015
and
2014
, gross gains of
$45 million
and
$12 million
, respectively, and gross losses of
$3 million
and
$3 million
, respectively, were reclassified out of other comprehensive income or other regulatory liabilities/assets into earnings.
Entergy Arkansas
Entergy Arkansas holds debt and equity securities, classified as available-for-sale, in nuclear decommissioning trust accounts. The securities held as of
June 30, 2015
and
December 31, 2014
are summarized as follows:
Fair
Value
Total
Unrealized
Gains
Total
Unrealized
Losses
(In Millions)
2015
Equity Securities
$475.1
$246.3
$—
Debt Securities
301.6
4.6
2.1
Total
$776.7
$250.9
$2.1
2014
Equity Securities
$487.3
$248.9
$—
Debt Securities
282.6
6.2
1.1
Total
$769.9
$255.1
$1.1
The amortized cost of debt securities was
$299.1 million
as of
June 30, 2015
and
$277.4 million
as of
December 31, 2014
. As of
June 30, 2015
, the debt securities have an average coupon rate of approximately
2.45%
, an average duration of approximately
5.33
years, and an average maturity of approximately
6.28
years. The equity securities are generally held in funds that are designed to approximate the return of the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index. A relatively small percentage of the equity securities are held in funds intended to replicate the return of the Wilshire 4500 Index.
82
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
The fair value and gross unrealized losses of available-for-sale equity and debt securities, summarized by investment type and length of time that the securities have been in a continuous loss position, are as follows as of
June 30, 2015
:
Equity Securities
Debt Securities
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
(In Millions)
Less than 12 months
$1.2
$—
$96.8
$1.6
More than 12 months
—
—
18.9
0.5
Total
$1.2
$—
$115.7
$2.1
The fair value and gross unrealized losses of available-for-sale equity and debt securities, summarized by investment type and length of time that the securities have been in a continuous loss position, are as follows as of
December 31, 2014
:
Equity Securities
Debt Securities
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
(In Millions)
Less than 12 months
$0.1
$—
$56.5
$0.3
More than 12 months
—
—
34.8
0.8
Total
$0.1
$—
$91.3
$1.1
The fair value of debt securities, summarized by contractual maturities, as of
June 30, 2015
and
December 31, 2014
are as follows:
2015
2014
(In Millions)
less than 1 year
$6.0
$14.9
1 year - 5 years
138.4
127.3
5 years - 10 years
135.9
128.2
10 years - 15 years
2.5
1.7
15 years - 20 years
1.0
1.0
20 years+
17.8
9.5
Total
$301.6
$282.6
During the
three months ended
June 30, 2015
and
2014
, proceeds from the dispositions of securities amounted to
$64.9 million
and
$25 million
, respectively. During the
three months ended
June 30, 2015
and
2014
, gross gains of
$0.3 million
and
$0.3 million
, respectively, and gross losses of
$0.02 million
and
$0.1 million
, respectively were reclassified out of other regulatory liabilities/assets into earnings.
During the
six months ended
June 30, 2015
and
2014
, proceeds from the dispositions of securities amounted to
$146.8 million
and
$70.3 million
, respectively. During the
six months ended
June 30, 2015
and
2014
, gross gains of
$5.4 million
and
$0.4 million
, respectively, and gross losses of
$0.02 million
and
$0.3 million
, respectively were reclassified out of other regulatory liabilities/assets into earnings.
83
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana holds debt and equity securities, classified as available-for-sale, in nuclear decommissioning trust accounts. The securities held as of
June 30, 2015
and
December 31, 2014
are summarized as follows:
Fair
Value
Total
Unrealized
Gains
Total
Unrealized
Losses
(In Millions)
2015
Equity Securities
$403.3
$178.7
$—
Debt Securities
241.3
7.7
1.7
Total
$644.6
$186.4
$1.7
2014
Equity Securities
$395.9
$177.6
$—
Debt Securities
241.8
11.9
0.3
Total
$637.7
$189.5
$0.3
The amortized cost of debt securities was
$239.8 million
as of
June 30, 2015
and
$231.5 million
as of
December 31, 2014
. As of
June 30, 2015
, the debt securities have an average coupon rate of approximately
4.53%
, an average duration of approximately
5.79
years, and an average maturity of approximately
10.93
years. The equity securities are generally held in funds that are designed to approximate the return of the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index. A relatively small percentage of the equity securities are held in funds intended to replicate the return of the Wilshire 4500 Index.
The fair value and gross unrealized losses of available-for-sale equity and debt securities, summarized by investment type and length of time that the securities have been in a continuous loss position, are as follows as of
June 30, 2015
:
Equity Securities
Debt Securities
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
(In Millions)
Less than 12 months
$2.5
$—
$79.0
$1.6
More than 12 months
—
—
2.1
0.1
Total
$2.5
$—
$81.1
$1.7
The fair value and gross unrealized losses of available-for-sale equity and debt securities, summarized by investment type and length of time that the securities have been in a continuous loss position, are as follows as of
December 31, 2014
:
Equity Securities
Debt Securities
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
(In Millions)
Less than 12 months
$0.1
$—
$14.0
$0.1
More than 12 months
—
—
15.0
0.2
Total
$0.1
$—
$29.0
$0.3
84
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
The fair value of debt securities, summarized by contractual maturities, as of
June 30, 2015
and
December 31, 2014
are as follows:
2015
2014
(In Millions)
less than 1 year
$4.1
$6.4
1 year - 5 years
71.4
59.8
5 years - 10 years
60.6
68.3
10 years - 15 years
42.0
43.6
15 years - 20 years
12.0
14.8
20 years+
51.2
48.9
Total
$241.3
$241.8
During the
three months ended
June 30, 2015
and
2014
, proceeds from the dispositions of securities amounted to
$31.7 million
and
$45.1 million
, respectively. During the
three months ended
June 30, 2015
and
2014
, gross gains of
$0.1 million
and
$0.5 million
, respectively, and gross losses of
$0.2 million
and $
0.1 million
, respectively, were reclassified out of other regulatory liabilities/assets into earnings.
During the
six months ended
June 30, 2015
and
2014
, proceeds from the dispositions of securities amounted to
$53.4 million
and
$75.4 million
, respectively. During the
six months ended
June 30, 2015
and
2014
, gross gains of
$1.4 million
and
$0.7 million
, respectively, and gross losses of
$0.2 million
and $
0.2 million
, respectively, were reclassified out of other regulatory liabilities/assets into earnings.
Entergy Louisiana
Entergy Louisiana holds debt and equity securities, classified as available-for-sale, in nuclear decommissioning trust accounts. The securities held as of
June 30, 2015
and
December 31, 2014
are summarized as follows:
Fair
Value
Total
Unrealized
Gains
Total
Unrealized
Losses
(In Millions)
2015
Equity Securities
$243.5
$117.5
$—
Debt Securities
146.7
5.2
0.8
Total
$390.2
$122.7
$0.8
2014
Equity Securities
$239.6
$116.7
$—
Debt Securities
144.0
6.9
0.4
Total
$383.6
$123.6
$0.4
The amortized cost of debt securities was
$142.2 million
as of
June 30, 2015
and
$137.9 million
as of
December 31, 2014
. As of
June 30, 2015
, the debt securities have an average coupon rate of approximately
2.93%
, an average duration of approximately
5.12
years, and an average maturity of approximately
8.07
years. The equity securities are generally held in funds that are designed to approximate the return of the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index. A relatively small percentage of the equity securities are held in funds intended to replicate the return of the Wilshire 4500 Index.
85
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
The fair value and gross unrealized losses of available-for-sale equity and debt securities, summarized by investment type and length of time that the securities have been in a continuous loss position, are as follows as of
June 30, 2015
:
Equity Securities
Debt Securities
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
(In Millions)
Less than 12 months
$1.0
$—
$32.1
$0.6
More than 12 months
—
—
5.7
0.2
Total
$1.0
$—
$37.8
$0.8
The fair value and gross unrealized losses of available-for-sale equity and debt securities, summarized by investment type and length of time that the securities have been in a continuous loss position, are as follows as of
December 31, 2014
:
Equity Securities
Debt Securities
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
(In Millions)
Less than 12 months
$0.1
$—
$19.1
$0.1
More than 12 months
—
—
12.1
0.3
Total
$0.1
$—
$31.2
$0.4
The fair value of debt securities, summarized by contractual maturities, as of
June 30, 2015
and
December 31, 2014
are as follows:
2015
2014
(In Millions)
less than 1 year
$9.8
$5.6
1 year - 5 years
54.9
58.2
5 years - 10 years
44.4
44.2
10 years - 15 years
9.8
7.3
15 years - 20 years
9.4
9.4
20 years+
18.4
19.3
Total
$146.7
$144.0
During the
three months ended
June 30, 2015
and
2014
, proceeds from the dispositions of securities amounted to
$7.9 million
and
$11.6 million
, respectively. During the
three months ended
June 30, 2015
and
2014
, gross gains of
$0.1 million
and
$0.05 million
, respectively, and gross losses of
$6.7 thousand
and
$0.2 thousand
, respectively, were reclassified out of other regulatory liabilities/assets into earnings.
During the
six months ended
June 30, 2015
and
2014
, proceeds from the dispositions of securities amounted to
$11.8 million
and
$29.7 million
, respectively. During the
six months ended
June 30, 2015
and
2014
, gross gains of
$0.1 million
and
$0.2 million
, respectively, and gross losses of
$11.6 thousand
and
$4.1 thousand
, respectively, were reclassified out of other regulatory liabilities/assets into earnings.
86
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
System Energy
System Energy holds debt and equity securities, classified as available-for-sale, in nuclear decommissioning trust accounts. The securities held as of
June 30, 2015
and
December 31, 2014
are summarized as follows:
Fair
Value
Total
Unrealized
Gains
Total
Unrealized
Losses
(In Millions)
2015
Equity Securities
$433.8
$189.3
$0.1
Debt Securities
263.5
4.4
1.1
Total
$697.3
$193.7
$1.2
2014
Equity Securities
$424.5
$188.0
$—
Debt Securities
255.3
5.9
0.3
Total
$679.8
$193.9
$0.3
The amortized cost of debt securities was
$264.6 million
as of
June 30, 2015
and
$251 million
as of
December 31, 2014
. As of
June 30, 2015
, the debt securities have an average coupon rate of approximately
2.33%
, an average duration of approximately
4.64
years, and an average maturity of approximately
6.19
years. The equity securities are generally held in funds that are designed to approximate the return of the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index. A relatively small percentage of the equity securities are held in funds intended to replicate the return of the Wilshire 4500 Index.
The fair value and gross unrealized losses of available-for-sale equity and debt securities, summarized by investment type and length of time that the securities have been in a continuous loss position, are as follows as of
June 30, 2015
:
Equity Securities
Debt Securities
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
(In Millions)
Less than 12 months
$1.8
$—
$74.9
$1.0
More than 12 months
—
0.1
1.5
0.1
Total
$1.8
$0.1
$76.4
$1.1
The fair value and gross unrealized losses of available-for-sale equity and debt securities, summarized by investment type and length of time that the securities have been in a continuous loss position, are as follows as of
December 31, 2014
:
Equity Securities
Debt Securities
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
(In Millions)
Less than 12 months
$0.1
$—
$51.6
$0.2
More than 12 months
—
—
6.5
0.1
Total
$0.1
$—
$58.1
$0.3
87
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
The fair value of debt securities, summarized by contractual maturities, as of
June 30, 2015
and
December 31, 2014
are as follows:
2015
2014
(In Millions)
less than 1 year
$16.5
$33.5
1 year - 5 years
150.6
139.7
5 years - 10 years
69.3
53.5
10 years - 15 years
3.3
3.4
15 years - 20 years
1.6
3.2
20 years+
22.2
22.0
Total
$263.5
$255.3
During the
three months ended
June 30, 2015
and
2014
, proceeds from the dispositions of securities amounted to
$83.6 million
and
$101.3 million
, respectively. During the
three months ended
June 30, 2015
and
2014
, gross gains of
$0.4 million
and
$0.4 million
, respectively, and gross losses of
$0.04 million
and
$0.1 million
, respectively, were reclassified out of other regulatory liabilities/assets into earnings.
During the
six months ended
June 30, 2015
and
2014
, proceeds from the dispositions of securities amounted to
$162 million
and
$231.6 million
, respectively. During the
six months ended
June 30, 2015
and
2014
, gross gains of
$0.8 million
and
$1.4 million
, respectively, and gross losses of
$0.1 million
and
$0.3 million
, respectively, were reclassified out of other regulatory liabilities/assets into earnings.
Other-than-temporary impairments and unrealized gains and losses
Entergy, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, and System Energy evaluate unrealized losses at the end of each period to determine whether an other-than-temporary impairment has occurred. The assessment of whether an investment in a debt security has suffered an other-than-temporary impairment is based on whether Entergy has the intent to sell or more likely than not will be required to sell the debt security before recovery of its amortized costs. Further, if Entergy does not expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the debt security, an other-than-temporary impairment is considered to have occurred and it is measured by the present value of cash flows expected to be collected less the amortized cost basis (credit loss). Entergy did not have any material other-than-temporary impairments relating to credit losses on debt securities for the
three
and
six
months ended
June 30, 2015
and
2014
. The assessment of whether an investment in an equity security has suffered an other-than-temporary impairment continues to be based on a number of factors including, first, whether Entergy has the ability and intent to hold the investment to recover its value, the duration and severity of any losses, and, then, whether it is expected that the investment will recover its value within a reasonable period of time. Entergy’s trusts are managed by third parties who operate in accordance with agreements that define investment guidelines and place restrictions on the purchases and sales of investments. Entergy did not record material charges to other income in the
three
and
six
months ended
June 30, 2015
and
2014
, respectively, resulting from the recognition of the other-than-temporary impairment of certain equity securities held in its decommissioning trust funds.
NOTE 10. INCOME TAXES (Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy)
See “
Income Tax Litigation
”, “
Income Tax Audits
”, and “
Other Tax Matters
” in Note 3 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of income tax proceedings, income tax audits, and other income tax matters involving Entergy. Following is an update to that discussion.
88
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
The IRS finalized tax and interest computations from the 2006-2007 audit in the first quarter 2015 that resulted in a reduction in Entergy's income tax expense of approximately
$20 million
, including decreases in income tax expense of approximately
$4 million
for Entergy Arkansas,
$5 million
for Entergy Gulf States Louisiana,
$6 million
for Entergy Louisiana, and
$1 million
for System Energy.
NOTE 11. PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT (Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy)
Construction Expenditures in Accounts Payable
Construction expenditures included in accounts payable at
June 30, 2015
are
$145 million
for Entergy,
$13.8 million
for Entergy Arkansas,
$33.4 million
for Entergy Gulf States Louisiana,
$16.9 million
for Entergy Louisiana,
$1 million
for Entergy Mississippi,
$0.2 million
for Entergy New Orleans,
$13.5 million
for Entergy Texas, and
$15.4 million
for System Energy. Construction expenditures included in accounts payable at
December 31, 2014
are
$209 million
for Entergy,
$37.3 million
for Entergy Arkansas,
$23.4 million
for Entergy Gulf States Louisiana,
$48 million
for Entergy Louisiana,
$7.8 million
for Entergy Mississippi,
$0.9 million
for Entergy New Orleans,
$24.1 million
for Entergy Texas, and
$7.7 million
for System Energy.
NOTE 12. VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES (Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy)
See Note 18 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of variable interest entities. See Note 4 to the financial statements herein for details of the nuclear fuel companies’ credit facilities and commercial paper borrowings and long-term debt.
Entergy Louisiana and System Energy are each considered to hold a variable interest in the lessors from which they lease, respectively, undivided interests representing approximately
9.3%
of the Waterford 3 and
11.5%
of the Grand Gulf nuclear plants. Entergy Louisiana and System Energy are the lessees under these arrangements, which are described in more detail in Note 10 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K. Entergy Louisiana made payments on its lease, including interest, of
$21 million
and
$22.7 million
in the six months ended
June 30, 2015
and
2014
, respectively. System Energy made payments on its lease, including interest, of
$37.6 million
and
$51.6 million
in the six months ended
June 30, 2015
and
2014
, respectively.
NOTE 13. ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS (Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy)
See Note 9 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of asset retirement obligations. Following are updates to that discussion.
In the second quarter 2015, Entergy Wholesale Commodities recorded a revision to its estimated decommissioning cost liability for a nuclear site as a result of a revised decommissioning cost study. The revised estimate resulted in a
$77.6 million
reduction in the decommissioning cost liability, along with a corresponding reduction in the related asset retirement cost asset.
89
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
__________________________________
In the opinion of the management of Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy, the accompanying unaudited financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting primarily of normal recurring accruals and reclassification of previously reported amounts to conform to current classifications) necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented. Entergy’s business is subject to seasonal fluctuations, however, with peak periods occurring typically during the first and third quarters. The results for the interim periods presented should not be used as a basis for estimating results of operations for a full year.
90
Table of Contents
Part I, Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of
June 30, 2015
, evaluations were performed under the supervision and with the participation of Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy (individually “Registrant” and collectively the “Registrants”) management, including their respective Principal Executive Officers (PEO) and Principal Financial Officers (PFO). The evaluations assessed the effectiveness of the Registrants’ disclosure controls and procedures. Based on the evaluations, each PEO and PFO has concluded that, as to the Registrant or Registrants for which they serve as PEO or PFO, the Registrant’s or Registrants’ disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by each Registrant in reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms; and that the Registrant’s or Registrants’ disclosure controls and procedures are also effective in reasonably assuring that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Registrant’s or Registrants’ management, including their respective PEOs and PFOs, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting
Under the supervision and with the participation of each Registrants’ management, including its respective PEO and PFO, each Registrant evaluated changes in internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended
June 30, 2015
and found no change that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, internal control over financial reporting.
91
Table of Contents
ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Results of Operations
Net Income
Second Quarter
2015
Compared to
Second Quarter
2014
Net income decreased $7.5 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses, higher nuclear refueling outage expenses, higher depreciation and amortization expenses, and higher interest expense, partially offset by higher net revenue.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2015
Compared to
Six Months Ended June 30, 2014
Net income decreased $18 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses, higher nuclear refueling outage expenses, and higher interest expense, partially offset by higher other income, higher net revenue, and a lower effective income tax rate.
Net Revenue
Second Quarter
2015
Compared to
Second Quarter
2014
Net revenue consists of operating revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale, 2) purchased power expenses, and 3) other regulatory credits. Following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing the
second quarter
2015
to the
second quarter
2014
:
Amount
(In Millions)
2014 net revenue
$329.5
Retail electric price
7.7
Net wholesale revenue
(2.0
)
Other
(0.2
)
2015 net revenue
$335.0
The retail electric price variance is primarily due to an increase in the energy efficiency rider, as approved by the APSC, effective July 2014. Energy efficiency revenues are largely offset by costs included in other operation and maintenance expenses and have a minimal effect on net income.
The net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to decreased non-retail sales to MISO.
92
Table of Contents
Entergy Arkansas, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Six Months Ended June 30, 2015
Compared to
Six Months Ended June 30, 2014
Net revenue consists of operating revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale, 2) purchased power expenses, and 3) other regulatory credits. Following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing the
six months ended June 30, 2015
to the
six months ended June 30, 2014
:
Amount
(In Millions)
2014 net revenue
$633.9
Retail electric price
13.4
Volume/weather
3.0
Asset retirement obligation
(3.6
)
Net wholesale revenue
(3.2
)
Other
(1.2
)
2015 net revenue
$642.3
The retail electric price variance is primarily due to an increase in the energy efficiency rider, as approved by the APSC, effective July 2014. Energy efficiency revenues are largely offset by costs included in other operation and maintenance expenses and have a minimal effect on net income.
The volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of more favorable weather during the unbilled sales period. See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
Critical Accounting Estimates
- Unbilled Revenue
” in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues.
The asset retirement obligation affects net revenue because Entergy Arkansas records a regulatory charge or credit for the difference between asset retirement obligation-related expenses and trust earnings plus asset retirement obligation-related costs collected in revenue. The variance for the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2014 is primarily caused by a decrease in the regulatory credits because of higher realized gains on decommissioning trust fund investments.
The net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to decreased non-retail sales to MISO.
Other Income Statement Variances
Second Quarter
2015
Compared to
Second Quarter
2014
Nuclear refueling outage expenses increased primarily due to higher costs associated with the most recent outage as compared to the previous outages.
Other operation and maintenance expenses increased primarily due to:
•
an increase of $12.1 million in nuclear generation expenses primarily due to an increase in regulatory compliance costs and higher labor costs. The increase in regulatory compliance costs is primarily related to additional NRC inspection activities in the second quarter 2015 as a result of the NRC’s March 2015 decision to move ANO into the “multiple/repetitive degraded cornerstone column” of the NRC’s reactor oversight process action matrix. See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
ANO Damage, Outage, and NRC Reviews
” below;
•
an increase of $4.3 million in distribution expenses primarily due to vegetation maintenance; and
•
an increase of $4.1 million in energy efficiency costs. These costs are recovered through the energy efficiency rider and have a minimal effect on net income.
93
Table of Contents
Entergy Arkansas, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
The increase was partially offset by a decrease of $6.5 million related to incentives recognized as a result of participation in energy efficiency programs.
Depreciation and amortization expenses increased primarily due to additions to plant in service.
Interest expense increased primarily due to the issuance of $250 million of 4.95% Series first mortgage bonds in December 2014.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2015
Compared to
Six Months Ended June 30, 2014
Nuclear refueling outage expenses increased primarily due to higher costs associated with the most recent outage as compared to the previous outages.
Other operation and maintenance expenses increased primarily due to:
•
an increase of $15.2 million in nuclear generation expenses primarily due to an increase in regulatory compliance costs and higher labor costs. The increase in regulatory compliance costs is primarily related to additional NRC inspection activities in 2015 as a result of the NRC’s March 2015 decision to move ANO into the “multiple/repetitive degraded cornerstone column” of the NRC’s reactor oversight process action matrix. See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
ANO Damage, Outage, and NRC Reviews
” below;
•
an increase of $14.4 million in energy efficiency costs, including the effects of true-ups to the energy efficiency filings for fixed costs to be collected from customers. Energy efficiency costs are recovered through the energy efficiency rider and have a minimal effect on net income; and
•
an increase of $6 million in distribution expenses primarily due to vegetation maintenance and higher labor costs.
The increase was partially offset by a decrease of $6.5 million related to incentives recognized as a result of participation in energy efficiency programs.
Taxes other than income taxes increased primarily due to an increase in payroll taxes, an increase in local franchise taxes resulting from higher residential and commercial revenues in 2015 as compared to 2014, and an increase in ad valorem taxes. Franchise taxes have no effect on net income as these taxes are recovered through the franchise tax rider.
Depreciation and amortization expenses increased primarily due to additions to plant in service.
Other income increased primarily due to higher realized gains in 2015 as compared to 2014 on the decommissioning trust fund investments. There is no effect on net income as these investment gains are offset by a corresponding amount of regulatory charges.
Interest expense increased primarily due to the issuance of $250 million of 4.95% Series first mortgage bonds in December 2014 and the issuance of $375 million of 3.7% Series first mortgage bonds in March 2014. The increase was partially offset by the repayment of $115 million of 5.0% Series first mortgage bonds in April 2014.
Income Taxes
The effective income tax rate was 40.9% for the second quarter 2015. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the second quarter 2015 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% was primarily due to state income taxes and certain book and tax differences related to utility plant items, partially offset by book and tax differences related to the allowance for equity funds used during construction.
94
Table of Contents
Entergy Arkansas, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
The effective income tax rate was 35.4% for the six months ended June 30, 2015. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2015 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% was primarily due to state income taxes and certain book and tax differences related to utility plant items, partially offset by book and tax differences related to the allowance for equity funds used during construction and the reversal of a portion of the provision for uncertain tax positions resulting from the receipt of finalized tax and interest computations for the 2006-2007 audit from the IRS. See Note 10 to the financial statements for a discussion of the finalized tax and interest computations for the 2006-2007 IRS audit.
The effective income tax rate was 43.5% for the second quarter 2014 and 43.1% for the six months ended June 30, 2014. The differences in the effective income tax rates for the second quarter 2014 and the six months ended June 30, 2014 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% were primarily due to state income taxes, certain book and tax differences related to utility plant items, and the provision for uncertain tax positions, partially offset by book and tax differences related to the allowance for equity funds used during construction.
ANO Damage, Outage, and NRC Reviews
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
ANO Damage, Outage, and NRC Reviews
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the ANO stator incident and subsequent NRC reviews.
As discussed in the Form 10-K, in January 2015 the NRC issued its final risk significance determination for the flood barrier violation originally cited in the September 2014 report. The NRC’s final risk significance determination was classified as “yellow with substantial safety significance.” In March 2015 the NRC issued a letter notifying Entergy of its decision to move ANO into the “multiple/repetitive degraded cornerstone column” of the NRC’s reactor oversight process action matrix. Placement into this column will require significant additional NRC inspection activities at the ANO site, including a review of the site’s root cause evaluation associated with the flood barrier and stator issues, an assessment of the effectiveness of the site’s corrective action program, an additional design basis inspection, a safety culture assessment, and possibly other inspection activities consistent with the NRC’s Inspection Procedure. Excluding remediation and response costs that may result from the additional NRC inspection activities, Entergy Arkansas expects to incur incremental costs of approximately $50 million in 2015, of which $18 million had been incurred as of June 30, 2015, and approximately $35 million in 2016 to prepare for the NRC inspection expected to occur in early 2016.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Flow
Cash flows for the
six months ended
June 30, 2015
and
2014
were as follows:
2015
2014
(In Thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
$218,505
$127,022
Cash flow provided by (used in):
Operating activities
214,338
105,057
Investing activities
(277,187
)
(247,982
)
Financing activities
(56,429
)
47,874
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
(119,278
)
(95,051
)
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$99,227
$31,971
95
Table of Contents
Entergy Arkansas, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Operating Activities
Net cash flow provided by operating activities increased $109.3 million for the
six months ended
June 30, 2015
compared to the
six months ended
June 30, 2014
primarily due to an increase in the recovery of fuel and purchased power costs including System Agreement bandwidth remedy collections from customers of $29.7 million received in 2015 and a $68 million payment made in May 2014 as a result of the compliance filing pursuant to the FERC’s February 2014 orders related to the bandwidth payments/receipts for the June - December 2005 period. See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the System Agreement proceedings.
The increase was partially offset by:
•
an increase of $16 million in income tax payments. Entergy Arkansas made income tax payments of $17.6 million in 2015 in accordance with the Entergy Corporation and Subsidiary Companies Intercompany Income Tax Allocation Agreement. The income tax payments made in 2015 resulted primarily from final settlement of amounts outstanding associated with the 2006-2007 IRS audit. See Note 10 to the financial statements for a discussion of the finalized tax and interest computations for the 2006-2007 IRS audit;
•
$8.8 million in insurance proceeds received in the first quarter 2014 for property damages related to the generator stator incident at ANO. See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
ANO Damage, Outage, and NRC Reviews
” herein and in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the ANO stator incident;
•
an increase of $8.7 million in spending on nuclear refueling outages in 2015 as compared to the same period in 2014;
•
an increase of $5.7 million in pension contributions in 2015. See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –
Critical Accounting Estimates
” in the Form 10-K and Note 6 to the financial statements herein for a discussion of qualified pension and other postretirement benefits funding; and
•
an increase of $4.5 million in interest paid in 2015 as compared to the same period in the prior year.
Investing Activities
Net cash flow used in investing activities increased $29.2 million for the
six months ended
June 30, 2015
compared to the
six months ended
June 30, 2014
primarily due to:
•
an increase in nuclear construction expenditures due to compliance with NRC post-Fukushima requirements and a higher scope of work on various nuclear projects in 2015;
•
$24.2 million in insurance proceeds received in the first quarter 2014 for property damages related to the generator stator incident at ANO. See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
ANO Damage, Outage, and NRC Reviews
” herein and in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the ANO stator incident; and
•
money pool activity.
The increase was partially offset by:
•
fluctuations in nuclear fuel activity because of variations from year to year in the timing and pricing of fuel reload requirements in the Utility business, material and services deliveries, and the timing of cash payments during the nuclear fuel cycle; and
•
a decrease in distribution construction expenditures primarily due to higher storm restoration spending in 2014.
Increases in Entergy Arkansas’s receivable from the money pool are a use of cash flow, and Entergy Arkansas’s receivable from the money pool increased by $4 million for the
six months ended
June 30, 2015
compared to decreasing by $17.5 million for the
six months ended
June 30, 2014
. The money pool is an inter-company borrowing arrangement designed to reduce the Utility subsidiaries’ need for external short-term borrowings.
96
Table of Contents
Entergy Arkansas, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Financing Activities
Entergy Arkansas’s financing activities used $56.4 million of cash for the
six months ended
June 30, 2015
compared to providing $47.9 million of cash for the
six months ended
June 30, 2014
primarily due to the following activity:
•
the issuance of $375 million of 3.7% Series first mortgage bonds in March 2014, the proceeds of which were used to pay, prior to maturities, a $250 million term loan in March 2014 and $115 million of 5.0% Series first mortgage bonds in April 2014;
•
net repayments of $48 million on the Entergy Arkansas nuclear fuel company variable interest entity credit facility in 2015 compared to net borrowings of $39.7 million in 2014; and
•
money pool activity.
Increases in Entergy Arkansas’s payable to the money pool are a source of cash flow, and Entergy Arkansas’s payable to the money pool increased by $11 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014.
See Note 5 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K and Note 4 to the financial statements herein for more details on long-term debt.
Capital Structure
Entergy Arkansas’s capitalization is balanced between equity and debt, as shown in the following table. The decrease in the debt to capital ratio for Entergy Arkansas is primarily due to the repayment of $48 million of borrowings on the nuclear fuel company variable interest entity credit facility in 2015.
June 30, 2015
December 31,
2014
Debt to capital
57.4
%
58.4
%
Effect of excluding the securitization bonds
(0.6
%)
(0.7
%)
Debt to capital, excluding securitization bonds (a)
56.8
%
57.7
%
Effect of subtracting cash
(1.0
%)
(2.2
%)
Net debt to net capital, excluding securitization bonds (a)
55.8
%
55.5
%
(a)
Calculation excludes the securitization bonds, which are non-recourse to Entergy Arkansas.
Net debt consists of debt less cash and cash equivalents. Debt consists of short-term borrowings and long-term debt, including the currently maturing portion. Capital consists of debt, preferred stock without sinking fund, and common equity. Net capital consists of capital less cash and cash equivalents. Entergy Arkansas uses the debt to capital ratios excluding securitization bonds in analyzing its financial condition and believes they provide useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating Entergy Arkansas’s financial condition because the securitization bonds are non-recourse to Entergy Arkansas, as more fully described in Note 5 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K. Entergy Arkansas also uses the net debt to net capital ratio excluding securitization bonds in analyzing its financial condition and believes it provides useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating Entergy Arkansas’s financial condition because net debt indicates Entergy Arkansas’s outstanding debt position that could not be readily satisfied by cash and cash equivalents on hand.
Uses and Sources of Capital
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
Liquidity and Capital Resources
”
in the Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy Arkansas’s uses and sources of capital. Following are additional updates to the information provided in the Form 10-K.
97
Table of Contents
Entergy Arkansas, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Entergy Arkansas’s receivables from or (payables to) the money pool were as follows:
June 30, 2015
December 31,
2014
June 30, 2014
December 31,
2013
(In Thousands)
$6,177
$2,218
($11,019)
$17,531
See Note 4 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a description of the money pool.
Entergy Arkansas has a credit facility in the amount of $150 million scheduled to expire in March 2019. Entergy Arkansas also has a $20 million credit facility scheduled to expire in April 2016. The $150 million credit facility allows Entergy Arkansas to issue letters of credit against 50% of the borrowing capacity of the facility. As of
June 30, 2015
, there were no cash borrowings and no letters of credit outstanding under the credit facilities. In addition, Entergy Arkansas is a party to an uncommitted letter of credit facility as a means to post collateral to support its obligations under MISO. As of
June 30, 2015
, a $2 million letter of credit was outstanding under Entergy Arkansas’s uncommitted letter of credit facility. See Note 4 to the financial statements herein for additional discussion of the credit facilities.
The Entergy Arkansas nuclear fuel company variable interest entity has a credit facility in the amount of $85 million scheduled to expire in June 2016. As of
June 30, 2015
, there were no letters of credit outstanding under the credit facility. See Note 4 to the financial statements herein for additional discussion of the nuclear fuel company variable interest entity credit facility.
Union Power Station Purchase Agreement
As discussed in the Form 10-K, in December 2014, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, and Entergy Texas entered into an asset purchase agreement to acquire the Union Power Station. The Union Power Station is a 1,980 MW (summer rating) power generation facility that consists of four power blocks, each rated at 495 MW. The purchase of the Union Power Station is contingent upon, among other things, obtaining necessary approvals, including cost recovery, from various federal and state regulatory and permitting agencies.
In January 2015, Entergy Arkansas filed its application with the APSC for approval of the acquisition and cost recovery. The APSC staff and the Arkansas Attorney General filed testimony stating that the acquisition is in the public interest. Only one party intervened opposing the acquisition. In July 2015, Entergy Arkansas filed rebuttal testimony. A hearing is scheduled in September 2015 with a decision expected in November 2015.
In February 2015, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, and Entergy Texas filed a notification and report form pursuant to the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act (HSR Act) with the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) and Federal Trade Commission with respect to their planned acquisition of the Union Power Station. Union Power Partners, L.P. (UPP), the seller, also filed a notification and report form in February 2015. In March 2015 the DOJ requested additional information and documentary material from each of the purchasing companies and UPP. Also in March 2015, UPP, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, and Entergy Texas filed an application with the FERC requesting authorization for the transaction. In April 2015, Entergy Texas and Entergy Gulf States Louisiana made a filing with the FERC to request authorization to recover their portions of the expected positive acquisition adjustment associated with the acquisition of the Union Power Station. Also in April 2015, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, and Entergy Texas made a filing with the FERC for approval of their proposed accounting treatment of the amortization expenses relating to the acquisition adjustment. Closing is targeted to occur in late-2015.
98
Table of Contents
Entergy Arkansas, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
State and Local Rate Regulation and Fuel-Cost Recovery
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –
State and Local Rate Regulation and Fuel-Cost Recovery
”
in the Form 10-K for a discussion of state and local rate regulation and fuel-cost recovery. The following is an update to that discussion.
In April 2015, Entergy Arkansas filed with the APSC for a general change in rates, charges, and tariffs. The filing notifies the APSC of Entergy Arkansas’s intent to implement a formula rate review mechanism pursuant to Arkansas legislation passed in 2015, and requests a retail rate increase of $268.4 million, with a net increase in revenue of $167 million. The filing requests a 10.2% return on common equity. In May 2015 the APSC issued an order suspending the proposed rates and tariffs filed by Entergy Arkansas and establishing a procedural schedule to complete its investigation of Entergy Arkansas’s application. A public evidentiary hearing is scheduled to begin in January 2016.
Federal Regulation
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –
Federal Regulation
”
in the Form 10-K for a discussion of federal regulation.
Nuclear Matters
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
Nuclear Matters
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of nuclear matters.
Environmental Risks
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
Environmental Risks
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of environmental risks.
Critical Accounting Estimates
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
Critical Accounting Estimates
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the estimates and judgments necessary in Entergy Arkansas’s accounting for nuclear decommissioning costs, unbilled revenue, and qualified pension and other postretirement benefits.
99
Table of Contents
ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended
Six Months Ended
2015
2014
2015
2014
(In Thousands)
(In Thousands)
OPERATING REVENUES
Electric
$551,809
$511,522
$1,063,062
$1,026,503
OPERATING EXPENSES
Operation and Maintenance:
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
145,315
16,922
250,187
109,075
Purchased power
80,671
173,623
180,485
292,471
Nuclear refueling outage expenses
13,443
9,499
25,506
18,176
Other operation and maintenance
169,365
158,711
329,910
297,256
Decommissioning
12,491
11,729
24,795
22,915
Taxes other than income taxes
22,980
21,526
48,684
43,434
Depreciation and amortization
61,540
59,108
121,642
116,829
Other regulatory credits - net
(9,145
)
(8,566
)
(9,952
)
(8,983
)
TOTAL
496,660
442,552
971,257
891,173
OPERATING INCOME
55,149
68,970
91,805
135,330
OTHER INCOME
Allowance for equity funds used during construction
3,532
1,660
5,906
3,413
Interest and investment income
2,861
3,596
13,813
7,613
Miscellaneous - net
(521
)
(366
)
(688
)
(730
)
TOTAL
5,872
4,890
19,031
10,296
INTEREST EXPENSE
Interest expense
26,417
23,688
52,904
46,521
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction
(1,844
)
(1,148
)
(3,075
)
(1,786
)
TOTAL
24,573
22,540
49,829
44,735
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES
36,448
51,320
61,007
100,891
Income taxes
14,923
22,315
21,617
43,516
NET INCOME
21,525
29,005
39,390
57,375
Preferred dividend requirements
1,718
1,718
3,437
3,437
EARNINGS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCK
$19,807
$27,287
$35,953
$53,938
See Notes to Financial Statements.
100
Table of Contents
ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014
(Unaudited)
2015
2014
(In Thousands)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income
$39,390
$57,375
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flow provided by operating activities:
Depreciation, amortization, and decommissioning, including nuclear fuel amortization
201,426
183,856
Deferred income taxes, investment tax credits, and non-current taxes accrued
37,397
92,466
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Receivables
(35,452
)
(5,397
)
Fuel inventory
13,730
20,217
Accounts payable
(8,930
)
(75,400
)
Prepaid taxes and taxes accrued
(29,667
)
(48,920
)
Interest accrued
(543
)
(2,390
)
Deferred fuel costs
56,023
(116,883
)
Other working capital accounts
(23,969
)
16,988
Provisions for estimated losses
(133
)
(768
)
Other regulatory assets
14,173
(35,399
)
Pension and other postretirement liabilities
(41,182
)
(41,193
)
Other assets and liabilities
(7,925
)
60,505
Net cash flow provided by operating activities
214,338
105,057
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Construction expenditures
(268,714
)
(261,336
)
Allowance for equity funds used during construction
7,329
5,069
Nuclear fuel purchases
(34,750
)
(104,487
)
Proceeds from sale of nuclear fuel
26,636
75,860
Proceeds from nuclear decommissioning trust fund sales
146,823
70,259
Investment in nuclear decommissioning trust funds
(150,453
)
(74,760
)
Changes in money pool receivable - net
(3,959
)
17,531
Changes in securitization account
(99
)
(474
)
Insurance proceeds
—
24,156
Other
—
200
Net cash flow used in investing activities
(277,187
)
(247,982
)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt
—
371,699
Retirement of long-term debt
(6,518
)
(371,314
)
Changes in short-term borrowings - net
(47,968
)
39,657
Change in money pool payable - net
—
11,019
Dividends paid:
Preferred stock
(3,437
)
(3,437
)
Other
1,494
250
Net cash flow provided by (used in) financing activities
(56,429
)
47,874
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
(119,278
)
(95,051
)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
218,505
127,022
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$99,227
$31,971
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest - net of amount capitalized
$50,671
$46,220
Income taxes
$17,587
$1,624
See Notes to Financial Statements.
101
Table of Contents
ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014
(Unaudited)
2015
2014
(In Thousands)
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents:
Cash
$8,673
$10,526
Temporary cash investments
90,554
207,979
Total cash and cash equivalents
99,227
218,505
Securitization recovery trust account
4,195
4,096
Accounts receivable:
Customer
112,813
97,314
Allowance for doubtful accounts
(32,117
)
(32,247
)
Associated companies
43,691
32,187
Other
106,409
110,269
Accrued unbilled revenues
96,842
80,704
Total accounts receivable
327,638
288,227
Accumulated deferred income taxes
19,264
21,533
Deferred fuel costs
86,587
143,279
Fuel inventory - at average cost
37,168
50,898
Materials and supplies - at average cost
169,273
162,792
Deferred nuclear refueling outage costs
43,418
29,690
Prepaid taxes
5,427
—
Prepayments and other
21,125
9,588
TOTAL
813,322
928,608
OTHER PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS
Decommissioning trust funds
776,718
769,883
Other
12,843
14,170
TOTAL
789,561
784,053
UTILITY PLANT
Electric
9,321,647
9,139,181
Property under capital lease
905
961
Construction work in progress
296,874
284,322
Nuclear fuel
249,520
293,695
TOTAL UTILITY PLANT
9,868,946
9,718,159
Less - accumulated depreciation and amortization
4,276,354
4,191,959
UTILITY PLANT - NET
5,592,592
5,526,200
DEFERRED DEBITS AND OTHER ASSETS
Regulatory assets:
Regulatory asset for income taxes - net
62,780
64,214
Other regulatory assets (includes securitization property of $61,134 as of June 30, 2015 and $67,877 as of December 31, 2014)
1,378,537
1,391,276
Deferred fuel costs
66,569
65,900
Other
51,546
47,674
TOTAL
1,559,432
1,569,064
TOTAL ASSETS
$8,754,907
$8,807,925
See Notes to Financial Statements.
102
Table of Contents
ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014
(Unaudited)
2015
2014
(In Thousands)
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Short-term borrowings
$—
$47,968
Accounts payable:
Associated companies
51,279
56,078
Other
148,781
174,998
Customer deposits
116,565
115,647
Taxes accrued
—
24,240
Accumulated deferred income taxes
9,557
15,009
Interest accrued
19,707
20,250
Other
46,915
27,872
TOTAL
392,804
482,062
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accumulated deferred income taxes and taxes accrued
2,034,719
1,997,983
Accumulated deferred investment tax credits
37,107
37,708
Other regulatory liabilities
254,430
254,036
Decommissioning
846,727
818,351
Accumulated provisions
5,556
5,689
Pension and other postretirement liabilities
530,711
571,870
Long-term debt (includes securitization bonds of $69,655 as of June 30, 2015 and $76,164 as of December 31, 2014)
2,664,952
2,671,343
Other
11,361
28,296
TOTAL
6,385,563
6,385,276
Commitments and Contingencies
Preferred stock without sinking fund
116,350
116,350
COMMON EQUITY
Common stock, $0.01 par value, authorized 325,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 46,980,196 shares in 2015 and 2014
470
470
Paid-in capital
588,471
588,471
Retained earnings
1,271,249
1,235,296
TOTAL
1,860,190
1,824,237
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
$8,754,907
$8,807,925
See Notes to Financial Statements.
103
Table of Contents
ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN COMMON EQUITY
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014
(Unaudited)
Common Equity
Common
Stock
Paid-in
Capital
Retained
Earnings
Total
(In Thousands)
Balance at December 31, 2013
$470
$588,471
$1,130,777
$1,719,718
Net income
—
—
57,375
57,375
Preferred stock dividends
—
—
(3,437
)
(3,437
)
Balance at June 30, 2014
$470
$588,471
$1,184,715
$1,773,656
Balance at December 31, 2014
$470
$588,471
$1,235,296
$1,824,237
Net income
—
—
39,390
39,390
Preferred stock dividends
—
—
(3,437
)
(3,437
)
Balance at June 30, 2015
$470
$588,471
$1,271,249
$1,860,190
See Notes to Financial Statements.
104
Table of Contents
ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SELECTED OPERATING RESULTS
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended
Increase/
Description
2015
2014
(Decrease)
%
(Dollars In Millions)
Electric Operating Revenues:
Residential
$159
$152
$7
5
Commercial
119
108
11
10
Industrial
111
100
11
11
Governmental
5
4
1
25
Total retail
394
364
30
8
Sales for resale:
Associated companies
32
30
2
7
Non-associated companies
68
63
5
8
Other
58
55
3
5
Total
$552
$512
$40
8
Billed Electric Energy Sales (GWh):
Residential
1,486
1,547
(61
)
(4
)
Commercial
1,374
1,356
18
1
Industrial
1,612
1,628
(16
)
(1
)
Governmental
55
57
(2
)
(4
)
Total retail
4,527
4,588
(61
)
(1
)
Sales for resale:
Associated companies
597
383
214
56
Non-associated companies
2,859
1,671
1,188
71
Total
7,983
6,642
1,341
20
Six Months Ended
Increase/
Description
2015
2014
(Decrease)
%
(Dollars In Millions)
Electric Operating Revenues:
Residential
$381
$358
$23
6
Commercial
230
210
20
10
Industrial
209
184
25
14
Governmental
9
8
1
13
Total retail
829
760
69
9
Sales for resale:
Associated companies
61
61
—
—
Non-associated companies
108
136
(28
)
(21
)
Other
65
70
(5
)
(7
)
Total
$1,063
$1,027
$36
4
Billed Electric Energy Sales (GWh):
Residential
3,971
4,128
(157
)
(4
)
Commercial
2,789
2,789
—
—
Industrial
3,223
3,151
72
2
Governmental
111
114
(3
)
(3
)
Total retail
10,094
10,182
(88
)
(1
)
Sales for resale:
Associated companies
1,107
845
262
31
Non-associated companies
4,328
3,423
905
26
Total
15,529
14,450
1,079
7
105
Table of Contents
ENTERGY GULF STATES LOUISIANA, L.L.C.
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Gulf States Louisiana Business Combination
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
-
Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Gulf States Louisiana Business Combination
” in the Form 10-K.
As discussed in the Form 10-K, Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Gulf States Louisiana filed an application with the LPSC in September 2014 seeking authorization to undertake the transactions that would result in the combination of Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Gulf States Louisiana into a single public utility. In the application, Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Gulf States Louisiana identified potential benefits, including enhanced economic and customer diversity, enhanced geographic and supply diversity, and greater administrative efficiency. In the initial proceedings with the LPSC, Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Gulf States Louisiana estimated that the business combination could produce up to $128 million in measurable customer benefits including proposed guaranteed customer credits of $97 million in the first ten years. In April 2015 the LPSC staff and intervenors filed testimony in the LPSC business combination proceeding. The testimony recommended an extensive set of conditions that would be required in order to recommend that the LPSC find that the business combination is in the public interest. The LPSC staff’s primary concern appeared to be potential shifting in fuel costs between legacy Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Gulf States Louisiana customers. In May 2015, Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Gulf States Louisiana filed rebuttal testimony. After the testimony was filed with the LPSC, the parties engaged in settlement discussions that ultimately led to the execution of an uncontested stipulated settlement (“stipulated settlement”), which was filed with the LPSC in July 2015. Through the stipulated settlement, the parties agreed to terms upon which to recommend that the LPSC find that the business combination is in the public interest. The stipulated settlement, which was either joined or unopposed by all parties to the LPSC proceeding, represents a compromise of stakeholder positions and was the result of an extensive period of analysis, discovery, and negotiation. The stipulated settlement provides $107 million in guaranteed customer benefits. Additionally, the combined company will honor the 2013 Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Gulf States Louisiana rate case settlements, including the commitments that (1) there will be no rate increase for legacy Entergy Gulf States Louisiana customers for the 2014 test year, and (2) through the 2016 test year formula rate plan, Entergy Louisiana (as a combined entity) will not raise rates by more than $30 million, net of the $10 million rate increase included in the Entergy Louisiana legacy formula rate plan. The stipulated settlement also describes the process for implementing a fuel tracker mechanism that is designed to address potential effects arising from the shifting of fuel costs between legacy Entergy Louisiana and legacy Entergy Gulf States Louisiana customers as a result of the combination of those companies’ fuel adjustment clauses by reallocating such cost shifts as between customers on an after-the-fact basis. The calculation of the fuel tracker will be submitted annually in a compliance filing. The stipulated settlement also provides that Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana are permitted to defer certain external costs that were incurred to achieve the business combination’s customer benefits. The deferred amount, which shall not exceed $25 million, will be subject to a prudence review and amortized over a 10-year period. A hearing on the stipulated settlement in the LPSC proceeding was held in July 2015. Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Gulf States Louisiana have requested that the LPSC issue its decision regarding the business combination in August 2015.
Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Gulf States Louisiana filed applications with the FERC requesting authorization for the business combination and Entergy Louisiana and Entergy New Orleans filed applications with the FERC requesting authorization of the Algiers asset transfer. The FERC has issued orders authorizing the business combination and the Algiers asset transfer.
106
Table of Contents
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, L.L.C.
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Results of Operations
Net Income
Second Quarter 2015 Compared to Second Quarter 2014
Net income decreased $2.2 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses and higher interest expense, partially offset by higher net revenue and higher other income.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2014
Net income increased $5.2 million primarily due to higher net revenue, higher other income, and a lower effective income tax rate, partially offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses and higher interest expense.
Net Revenue
Second Quarter 2015 Compared to Second Quarter 2014
Net revenue consists of operating revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale, 2) purchased power expenses, and 3) other regulatory charges (credits). Following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing the
second
quarter 2015 to the
second
quarter 2014:
Amount
(In Millions)
2014 net revenue
$234.9
Volume/weather
4.2
Net wholesale revenue
2.6
Retail electric price
1.1
Other
0.7
2015 net revenue
$243.5
The volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 103 GWh, or 2%, in billed electricity usage as a result of the effect of weather as compared to the prior year, primarily in the residential and commercial sectors, and an increase in industrial usage. The increase in the industrial usage was the result of new customers and expansion projects primarily in the chemicals industry, partially offset by decreased usage in the pulp and paper industry.
The net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to higher wholesale billings to affiliate companies due to higher expenses.
The retail electric price variance is primarily due to an increase in purchased power capacity costs that are recovered through base rates set in the annual formula rate plan mechanism. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of Entergy Gulf States Louisiana’s formula rate plan.
107
Table of Contents
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, L.L.C.
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2014
Net revenue consists of operating revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale, 2) purchased power expenses, and 3) other regulatory charges (credits). Following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing the six months ended June 30, 2015 to the six months ended June 30, 2014:
Amount
(In Millions)
2014 net revenue
$473.2
Net wholesale revenue
4.5
Volume/weather
3.9
Retail electric price
2.2
Other
1.7
2015 net revenue
$485.5
The net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to higher wholesale billings to affiliate companies due to higher expenses.
The volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 153 GWh, or 2%, in billed electricity usage, including an increase in industrial usage, and an increase in unbilled sales volume, partially offset by the effect of weather as compared to the prior year. The increase in industrial usage is primarily due to new customers and expansion projects primarily in the chemicals industry, partially offset by decreased usage primarily in the pulp and paper industry. See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
Critical Accounting Estimates
- Unbilled Revenue
”
in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues.
The retail electric price variance is primarily due to an increase in purchased power capacity costs that are recovered through base rates set in the annual formula rate plan mechanism. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of Entergy Gulf States Louisiana’s formula rate plan.
Other Income Statement Variances
Second Quarter 2015 Compared to Second Quarter 2014
Other operation and maintenance expenses increased primarily due to:
•
an increase of $3.3 million in nuclear generation expenses primarily due to higher labor costs, including contract labor, and higher materials costs;
•
an increase of $2.9 million in transmission expenses primarily due to an increase in the amount of transmission costs allocated by MISO. There is no effect on net income due to the recovery of these costs through the formula rate plan. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further information on the recovery of these costs;
•
an increase of $1.6 million in loss reserves primarily related to environmental loss reserves;
•
an increase of $1.5 million as a result of spending related to the Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Gulf States Louisiana business combination. See “
Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Gulf States Louisiana Business Combination
” above for discussion of the business combination; and
•
an increase of $1.1 million due to the amortization, effective December 2014, of costs related to the transition and implementation of joining the MISO RTO.
Other income increased primarily due to:
•
an increase of $1.7 million as a result of income collected from contracts with independent power producers; and
108
Table of Contents
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, L.L.C.
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
•
an increase of $1.2 million due to income earned on preferred membership interests purchased from Entergy Holdings Company with the proceeds received in August 2014 from the Act 55 storm cost financing. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the Act 55 storm cost financing.
Interest expense increased primarily due to the issuance of $110 million of 3.78% Series first mortgage bonds in July 2014.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2014
Other operation and maintenance expenses increased primarily due to:
•
an increase of $5.4 million in nuclear generation expenses primarily due to higher labor costs, including contract labor, and higher materials costs;
•
an increase of $4.2 million in transmission expenses primarily due to an increase in the amount of transmission costs allocated by MISO. There is no effect on net income due to the recovery of these costs through the formula rate plan. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further information on the recovery of these costs;
•
an increase of $3 million as a result of spending related to the Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Gulf States Louisiana business combination. See “
Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Gulf States Louisiana Business Combination
” above for discussion of the business combination; and
•
an increase of $2.4 million due to the amortization, effective December 2014, of costs related to the transition and implementation of joining the MISO RTO.
Other income increased primarily due to:
•
an increase of $3.5 million as a result of income collected from contracts with independent power producers;
•
an increase of $2.4 million due to higher realized gains in 2015 on the River Bend decommissioning trust fund investments. There is no effect on net income as these investment gains are offset by a corresponding amount of regulatory charges; and
•
an increase of $2.4 million due to income earned on preferred membership interests purchased from Entergy Holdings Company with the proceeds received in August 2014 from the Act 55 storm cost financing. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the Act 55 storm cost financing.
Interest expense increased primarily due to the issuance of $110 million of 3.78% Series first mortgage bonds in July 2014.
Income Taxes
The effective income tax rate was 36.3% for the
second
quarter 2015. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the
second
quarter 2015 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% was primarily due to state income taxes, certain book and tax differences related to utility plant items, and the provision for uncertain tax positions, partially offset by book and tax differences related to the non-taxable income distributions earned on preferred membership interests and the amortization of investment tax credits.
The effective income tax rate was 30.8% for the six months ended June 30, 2015. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2015 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% was primarily due to book and tax differences related to the non-taxable income distributions earned on preferred membership interests and the reversal of a portion of the provision for uncertain tax positions resulting from the receipt of finalized tax and interest computations for the 2006-2007 audit from the IRS, and the amortization of investment tax credits, partially offset by state income taxes and certain book and tax differences related to utility plant items. See Note 10 to the financial statements for a discussion of the finalized tax and interest computations for the 2006-2007 IRS audit.
109
Table of Contents
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, L.L.C.
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
The effective income tax rate was 36.2% for the
second
quarter 2014 and 36.3% for the six months ended June 30, 2014. The differences in the effective income tax rates for the
second
quarter 2014 and the six months ended June 30, 2014 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% were primarily due to state income taxes and certain book and tax differences related to utility plant items, partially offset by book and tax differences related to the non-taxable income distributions earned on preferred membership interests.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Flow
Cash flows for the
six months ended
June 30, 2015
and
2014
were as follows:
2015
2014
(In Thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
$162,963
$15,581
Cash flow provided by (used in):
Operating activities
201,547
215,465
Investing activities
(299,510
)
(107,014
)
Financing activities
19,586
(77,005
)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
(78,377
)
31,446
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$84,586
$47,027
Operating Activities
Net cash flow provided by operating activities decreased $13.9 million for the
six months ended
June 30, 2015
compared to the
six months ended
June 30, 2014
primarily due to:
•
an increase of $30.9 million in spending on nuclear refueling outages in 2015 as compared to the same period in 2014; and
•
System Agreement bandwidth remedy payments of $10.1 million received in the second quarter of 2014 as a result of the compliance filing pursuant to the FERC’s February 2014 orders related to the bandwidth payments/receipts for the June - December 2005 period. In the second quarter 2014, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana customers were credited $3.7 million.
The decrease was partially offset by increased recovery of fuel costs compared to prior year.
Investing Activities
Net cash flow used in investing activities increased $192.5 million for the
six months ended
June 30, 2015
compared to the
six months ended
June 30, 2014
primarily due to:
•
fluctuations in nuclear fuel activity because of variations from year to year in the timing and pricing of fuel reload requirements in the Utility business, material and services deliveries, and the timing of cash payments during the nuclear fuel cycle;
•
an increase in nuclear construction expenditures at the River Bend plant as a result of an increased scope of work performed in 2015; and
•
cash collateral of $32.3 million posted in 2015 to support Entergy Gulf States Louisiana’s obligation to MISO.
110
Table of Contents
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, L.L.C.
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Financing Activities
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana’s financing activities provided $19.6 million of cash for the
six months ended
June 30, 2015
compared to using $77 million of cash for the
six months ended
June 30, 2014
primarily due to:
•
common equity distributions of $77.8 million in 2014; and
•
an increase of $32.9 million in credit borrowings against the nuclear fuel company variable interest entity credit facility in 2015 compared to repayments of $14.8 million in credit borrowings in 2014.
These increases in cash flow were partially offset by contributions in aid of construction of $12.9 million spent on projects in 2015 compared to contributions in aid of construction of $16.1 million received in 2014.
Capital Structure
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana’s capitalization is balanced between equity and debt, as shown in the following table.
June 30,
2015
December 31,
2014
Debt to capital
52.2
%
53.1
%
Effect of subtracting cash
(1.4
%)
(2.6
%)
Net debt to net capital
50.8
%
50.5
%
Net debt consists of debt less cash and cash equivalents. Debt consists of short-term borrowings and long-term debt, including the currently maturing portion. Capital consists of debt and equity. Net capital consists of capital less cash and cash equivalents. Entergy Gulf States Louisiana uses the debt to capital ratio in analyzing its financial condition and believes it provides useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating Entergy Gulf States Louisiana’s financial condition. Entergy Gulf States Louisiana uses the net debt to net capital ratio in analyzing its financial condition and believes it provides useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating Entergy Gulf States Louisiana’s financial condition because net debt indicates Entergy Gulf States Louisiana’s outstanding debt position that could not be readily satisfied by cash and cash equivalents on hand.
Uses and Sources of Capital
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
Liquidity and Capital Resources
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy Gulf States Louisiana’s uses and sources of capital. Following are additional updates to the information provided in the Form 10-K.
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana’s receivables from the money pool were as follows:
June 30,
2015
December 31,
2014
June 30,
2014
December 31,
2013
(In Thousands)
$5,230
$1,166
$12,801
$1,925
See Note 4 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a description of the money pool.
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana has a credit facility in the amount of $150 million scheduled to expire in March 2019. The credit facility allows Entergy Gulf States Louisiana to issue letters of credit against 50% of the borrowing capacity of the facility. As of
June 30, 2015
, there were no cash borrowings and no letters of credit outstanding under the credit facility. In addition, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana is a party to an uncommitted letter of credit facility as a means to post collateral to support its obligations under MISO. As of
June 30, 2015
, a $16.6 million letter of credit
111
Table of Contents
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, L.L.C.
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
was outstanding under Entergy Gulf States Louisiana’s uncommitted letter of credit facility. See Note 4 to the financial statements herein for additional discussion of the credit facilities.
The Entergy Gulf States Louisiana nuclear fuel company variable interest entity has a credit facility in the amount of $100 million scheduled to expire in June 2016. As of
June 30, 2015
, $32.9 million was outstanding under the variable interest entity credit facility. See Note 4 to the financial statements herein for additional discussion of the variable interest entity credit facility.
Union Power Station Purchase Agreement
As discussed in the Form 10-K, in December 2014, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, and Entergy Texas entered into an asset purchase agreement to acquire the Union Power Station. The Union Power Station is a 1,980 MW (summer rating) power generation facility that consists of four power blocks, each rated at 495 MW. The purchase of the Union Power Station is contingent upon, among other things, obtaining necessary approvals, including cost recovery, from various federal and state regulatory and permitting agencies.
In December 2014, Entergy Texas filed its application for Certificate of Convenience and Necessity (CCN) with the PUCT seeking one of the two necessary PUCT approvals of the acquisition. In April 2015 intervenors, the Office of Public Utility Counsel, the Texas Industrial Energy Consumers, and the East Texas Electric Cooperative each filed testimony opposing the transaction. In May 2015, PUCT staff filed testimony opposing the transaction. The PUCT held a hearing in June 2015 on Entergy Texas’s CCN application, resulting in a PUCT request for additional testimony, which Entergy Texas and intervenors filed in June and July 2015. In a separate proceeding initiated in June 2015, Entergy Texas filed a rate application to seek cost recovery of its power block acquisition costs and other costs. In July 2015 the PUCT requested briefing on legal and policy issues related to post-test year adjustments and other rate-recovery issues in Entergy Texas’s base rate case. Based on the opposition to the acquisition of the power block, Entergy Texas determined it was appropriate to seek to dismiss the CCN filing and withdraw the rate case. In July 2015, Entergy Texas withdrew the rate case and, together with other parties, filed a motion with the PUCT to dismiss Entergy Texas’s CCN application. On July 30, 2015, the PUCT granted the motion to dismiss the CCN case. The power block originally allocated to Entergy Texas will be acquired by Entergy New Orleans, subject to City Council approval and the satisfaction of other conditions to close the transaction. The acquisition by Entergy New Orleans would replace the power purchase agreement with Entergy Gulf States Louisiana that the City Council approved in June 2015. Entergy New Orleans will file an application for authorization to proceed with the acquisition and plans to seek City Council resolution by a date that would support closing the transaction by the end of 2015.
In January 2015, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana filed its application with the LPSC for approval of the acquisition and cost recovery. In May 2015 the LPSC staff and intervenors filed testimony. The LPSC staff supports the transaction. In June 2015, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana filed rebuttal testimony. Supplemental testimony was submitted in July 2015 explaining the reallocation of one of the power blocks to Entergy New Orleans. A hearing is scheduled in September 2015 with a decision expected in fourth quarter 2015.
In January 2015, Entergy Arkansas filed its application with the APSC for approval of the acquisition and cost recovery. The APSC staff and the Arkansas Attorney General filed testimony stating that the acquisition is in the public interest. Only one party intervened opposing the acquisition. In July 2015, Entergy Arkansas filed rebuttal testimony. A hearing is scheduled in September 2015 with a decision expected in November 2015.
In February 2015, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, and Entergy Texas filed a notification and report form pursuant to the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act (HSR Act) with the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) and Federal Trade Commission with respect to their planned acquisition of the Union Power Station. Union Power Partners, L.P. (UPP), the seller, also filed a notification and report form in February 2015. In March 2015 the DOJ requested additional information and documentary material from each of the purchasing companies and UPP. Also in March 2015, UPP, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, and Entergy Texas filed an application with the FERC requesting authorization for the transaction. In April 2015, Entergy Texas and
112
Table of Contents
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, L.L.C.
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana made a filing with the FERC to request authorization to recover their portions of the expected positive acquisition adjustment associated with the acquisition of the Union Power Station. Also in April 2015, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, and Entergy Texas made a filing with the FERC for approval of their proposed accounting treatment of the amortization expenses relating to the acquisition adjustment. Closing is targeted to occur in late-2015.
State and Local Rate Regulation and Fuel-Cost Recovery
See
“
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –
State and Local Rate Regulation and Fuel-Cost Recovery
”
in the Form 10-K for a discussion of state and local rate regulation and fuel-cost recovery
.
The following are updates to that discussion.
Fuel and purchased power cost recovery
In July 2014 the LPSC authorized its staff to initiate an audit of Entergy Gulf States Louisiana’s fuel adjustment clause filings. The audit includes a review of the reasonableness of charges flowed by Entergy Gulf States Louisiana through its fuel adjustment clause for the period from 2010 through 2013. Discovery commenced in July 2015.
Retail Rates - Gas
In January 2015, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana filed with the LPSC its gas rate stabilization plan for the test year ended September 30, 2014. The filing showed an earned return on common equity of 7.20%, which results in a $706 thousand rate increase. In April 2015 the LPSC issued findings recommending two adjustments to Entergy Gulf States Louisiana’s as-filed results, and an additional recommendation that does not affect current year results. The LPSC staff’s recommended adjustments increase the earned return on equity for the test year to 7.24%. Entergy Gulf States Louisiana accepted the LPSC staff’s recommendations and a revenue increase of $688 thousand will be required as opposed to the $706 thousand requested by Entergy Gulf States Louisiana. The resulting change was implemented with the first billing cycle of May 2015.
Industrial and Commercial Customers
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –
Industrial and Commercial Customers
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of industrial and commercial customers.
Federal Regulation
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –
Federal Regulation
”
in the Form 10-K for a discussion of federal regulation.
Nuclear Matters
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
Nuclear Matters
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of nuclear matters.
Environmental Risks
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
Environmental Risks
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of environmental risks.
113
Table of Contents
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, L.L.C.
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Critical Accounting Estimates
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
Critical Accounting Estimates
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the estimates and judgments necessary in Entergy Gulf States Louisiana’s accounting for nuclear decommissioning costs, unbilled revenue, and qualified pension and other postretirement benefits.
114
Table of Contents
ENTERGY GULF STATES LOUISIANA, L.L.C.
INCOME STATEMENTS
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended
Six Months Ended
2015
2014
2015
2014
(In Thousands)
(In Thousands)
OPERATING REVENUES
Electric
$461,309
$540,606
$923,705
$1,022,028
Natural gas
10,270
13,428
34,651
45,301
TOTAL
471,579
554,034
958,356
1,067,329
OPERATING EXPENSES
Operation and Maintenance:
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
44,446
88,471
121,160
147,676
Purchased power
183,582
233,207
349,463
452,915
Nuclear refueling outage expenses
5,483
5,332
10,188
10,605
Other operation and maintenance
107,506
95,579
199,453
182,676
Decommissioning
4,345
4,181
8,631
8,302
Taxes other than income taxes
20,680
20,737
43,549
41,746
Depreciation and amortization
39,593
38,732
78,383
76,974
Other regulatory charges (credits) - net
43
(2,555
)
2,239
(6,491
)
TOTAL
405,678
483,684
813,066
914,403
OPERATING INCOME
65,901
70,350
145,290
152,926
OTHER INCOME
Allowance for equity funds used during construction
1,270
1,695
3,313
3,341
Interest and investment income
9,078
7,436
22,689
17,493
Miscellaneous - net
(1,807
)
(3,649
)
(2,544
)
(5,367
)
TOTAL
8,541
5,482
23,458
15,467
INTEREST EXPENSE
Interest expense
21,890
20,292
43,830
40,570
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction
(759
)
(1,160
)
(2,026
)
(1,921
)
TOTAL
21,131
19,132
41,804
38,649
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES
53,311
56,700
126,944
129,744
Income taxes
19,348
20,529
39,136
47,101
NET INCOME
33,963
36,171
87,808
82,643
Preferred distribution requirements and other
206
209
412
415
EARNINGS APPLICABLE TO COMMON EQUITY
$33,757
$35,962
$87,396
$82,228
See Notes to Financial Statements.
115
Table of Contents
ENTERGY GULF STATES LOUISIANA, L.L.C.
STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended
Six Months Ended
2015
2014
2015
2014
(In Thousands)
(In Thousands)
Net Income
$33,963
$36,171
$87,808
$82,643
Other comprehensive income
Pension and other postretirement liabilities
(net of tax expense of $274, $85, $563, and $186)
438
137
860
259
Other comprehensive income
438
137
860
259
Comprehensive Income
$34,401
$36,308
$88,668
$82,902
See Notes to Financial Statements.
116
Table of Contents
ENTERGY GULF STATES LOUISIANA, L.L.C.
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014
(Unaudited)
2015
2014
(In Thousands)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income
$87,808
$82,643
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flow provided by operating activities:
Depreciation, amortization, and decommissioning, including nuclear fuel amortization
108,295
116,122
Deferred income taxes, investment tax credits, and non-current taxes accrued
15,937
45,579
Changes in working capital:
Receivables
(39,416
)
(59,914
)
Fuel inventory
(7,955
)
2,003
Accounts payable
22,846
51,357
Prepaid taxes and taxes accrued
45,262
23,211
Interest accrued
(1,049
)
(1,001
)
Deferred fuel costs
(2,420
)
(16,332
)
Other working capital accounts
(26,805
)
(3,992
)
Changes in provisions for estimated losses
(1,626
)
(3,335
)
Changes in other regulatory assets
19,147
4,671
Changes in pension and other postretirement liabilities
(8,035
)
(6,130
)
Other
(10,442
)
(19,417
)
Net cash flow provided by operating activities
201,547
215,465
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Construction expenditures
(159,500
)
(125,851
)
Allowance for equity funds used during construction
3,313
3,341
Nuclear fuel purchases
(97,985
)
(20,821
)
Proceeds from the sale of nuclear fuel
—
54,642
Payment to storm reserve escrow account
(42
)
(7
)
Increase in investments
(32,300
)
—
Proceeds from nuclear decommissioning trust fund sales
53,358
75,419
Investment in nuclear decommissioning trust funds
(62,290
)
(82,861
)
Changes in money pool receivable - net
(4,064
)
(10,876
)
Net cash flow used in investing activities
(299,510
)
(107,014
)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Changes in credit borrowings - net
32,900
(14,800
)
Distributions paid:
Common equity
—
(77,845
)
Preferred membership interests
(412
)
(412
)
Other
(12,902
)
16,052
Net cash flow provided by (used in) financing activities
19,586
(77,005
)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
(78,377
)
31,446
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
162,963
15,581
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$84,586
$47,027
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest - net of amount capitalized
$43,439
$40,141
Income taxes
$5,537
$5,700
See Notes to Financial Statements.
117
Table of Contents
ENTERGY GULF STATES LOUISIANA, L.L.C.
BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014
(Unaudited)
2015
2014
(In Thousands)
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents:
Cash
$7,289
$53,394
Temporary cash investments
77,297
109,569
Total cash and cash equivalents
84,586
162,963
Accounts receivable:
Customer
74,073
67,006
Allowance for doubtful accounts
(1,575
)
(625
)
Associated companies
101,147
86,966
Other
29,930
18,379
Accrued unbilled revenues
65,710
54,079
Total accounts receivable
269,285
225,805
Fuel inventory - at average cost
24,162
16,207
Materials and supplies - at average cost
119,814
121,237
Deferred nuclear refueling outage costs
35,787
7,416
Prepaid taxes
—
24,058
Prepayments and other
61,654
21,064
TOTAL
595,288
578,750
OTHER PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS
Investment in affiliate preferred membership interests
355,906
355,906
Decommissioning trust funds
644,587
637,744
Non-utility property - at cost (less accumulated depreciation)
199,047
193,407
Storm reserve escrow account
90,103
90,061
Other
15,640
14,887
TOTAL
1,305,283
1,292,005
UTILITY PLANT
Electric
7,719,556
7,600,730
Natural gas
152,514
148,586
Construction work in progress
135,769
127,436
Nuclear fuel
210,467
131,901
TOTAL UTILITY PLANT
8,218,306
8,008,653
Less - accumulated depreciation and amortization
4,229,138
4,176,242
UTILITY PLANT - NET
3,989,168
3,832,411
DEFERRED DEBITS AND OTHER ASSETS
Regulatory assets:
Regulatory asset for income taxes - net
160,117
161,714
Other regulatory assets
408,831
426,381
Deferred fuel costs
100,124
100,124
Other
13,283
12,438
TOTAL
682,355
700,657
TOTAL ASSETS
$6,572,094
$6,403,823
See Notes to Financial Statements.
118
Table of Contents
ENTERGY GULF STATES LOUISIANA, L.L.C.
BALANCE SHEETS
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014
(Unaudited)
2015
2014
(In Thousands)
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Currently maturing long-term debt
$64,855
$31,955
Accounts payable:
Associated companies
106,343
102,933
Other
129,962
108,874
Customer deposits
57,940
56,749
Taxes accrued
21,204
—
Accumulated deferred income taxes
33,668
21,095
Interest accrued
26,026
27,075
Deferred fuel costs
8,160
10,580
Other
51,901
44,517
TOTAL
500,059
403,778
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accumulated deferred income taxes and taxes accrued
1,602,502
1,601,032
Accumulated deferred investment tax credits
70,861
72,277
Other regulatory liabilities
175,355
176,305
Decommissioning and asset retirement cost liabilities
459,795
446,619
Accumulated provisions
105,359
106,985
Pension and other postretirement liabilities
392,967
401,144
Long-term debt
1,590,986
1,590,862
Long-term payables - associated companies
25,351
26,156
Other
130,055
148,102
TOTAL
4,553,231
4,569,482
Commitments and Contingencies
EQUITY
Preferred membership interests without sinking fund
10,000
10,000
Member's equity
1,561,291
1,473,910
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
(52,487
)
(53,347
)
TOTAL
1,518,804
1,430,563
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
$6,572,094
$6,403,823
See Notes to Financial Statements.
119
Table of Contents
ENTERGY GULF STATES LOUISIANA, L.L.C.
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014
(Unaudited)
Common Equity
Preferred Membership Interests
Member's
Equity
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Total
(In Thousands)
Balance at December 31, 2013
$10,000
$1,479,179
($28,202
)
$1,460,977
Net income
—
82,643
—
82,643
Other comprehensive income
—
—
259
259
Distributions declared on common equity
—
(77,845
)
—
(77,845
)
Distributions declared on preferred membership interests
—
(415
)
—
(415
)
Other
—
(18
)
—
(18
)
Balance at June 30, 2014
$10,000
$1,483,544
($27,943
)
$1,465,601
Balance at December 31, 2014
$10,000
$1,473,910
($53,347
)
$1,430,563
Net income
—
87,808
—
87,808
Other comprehensive income
—
—
860
860
Distributions declared on preferred membership interests
—
(412
)
—
(412
)
Other
—
(15
)
—
(15
)
Balance at June 30, 2015
$10,000
$1,561,291
($52,487
)
$1,518,804
See Notes to Financial Statements.
120
Table of Contents
ENTERGY GULF STATES LOUISIANA, L.L.C.
SELECTED OPERATING RESULTS
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended
Increase/
Description
2015
2014
(Decrease)
%
(Dollars In Millions)
Electric Operating Revenues:
Residential
$102
$115
($13
)
(11
)
Commercial
99
115
(16
)
(14
)
Industrial
131
162
(31
)
(19
)
Governmental
5
6
(1
)
(17
)
Total retail
337
398
(61
)
(15
)
Sales for resale:
Associated companies
90
104
(14
)
(13
)
Non-associated companies
11
17
(6
)
(35
)
Other
23
22
1
5
Total
$461
$541
($80
)
(15
)
Billed Electric Energy Sales (GWh):
Residential
1,171
1,145
26
2
Commercial
1,285
1,272
13
1
Industrial
2,561
2,501
60
2
Governmental
62
58
4
7
Total retail
5,079
4,976
103
2
Sales for resale:
Associated companies
1,668
1,678
(10
)
(1
)
Non-associated companies
178
300
(122
)
(41
)
Total
6,925
6,954
(29
)
—
Six Months Ended
Increase/
Description
2015
2014
(Decrease)
%
(Dollars In Millions)
Electric Operating Revenues:
Residential
$216
$240
($24
)
(10
)
Commercial
200
219
(19
)
(9
)
Industrial
262
286
(24
)
(8
)
Governmental
11
12
(1
)
(8
)
Total retail
689
757
(68
)
(9
)
Sales for resale:
Associated companies
171
196
(25
)
(13
)
Non-associated companies
21
38
(17
)
(45
)
Other
43
31
12
39
Total
$924
$1,022
($98
)
(10
)
Billed Electric Energy Sales (GWh):
Residential
2,431
2,527
(96
)
(4
)
Commercial
2,518
2,528
(10
)
—
Industrial
4,946
4,694
252
5
Governmental
123
116
7
6
Total retail
10,018
9,865
153
2
Sales for resale:
Associated companies
2,906
3,369
(463
)
(14
)
Non-associated companies
346
521
(175
)
(34
)
Total
13,270
13,755
(485
)
(4
)
121
Table of Contents
ENTERGY LOUISIANA, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Gulf States Louisiana Business Combination
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
-
Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Gulf States Louisiana Business Combination
” in the Form 10-K.
As discussed in the Form 10-K, Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Gulf States Louisiana filed an application with the LPSC in September 2014 seeking authorization to undertake the transactions that would result in the combination of Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Gulf States Louisiana into a single public utility. In the application, Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Gulf States Louisiana identified potential benefits, including enhanced economic and customer diversity, enhanced geographic and supply diversity, and greater administrative efficiency. In the initial proceedings with the LPSC, Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Gulf States Louisiana estimated that the business combination could produce up to $128 million in measurable customer benefits including proposed guaranteed customer credits of $97 million in the first ten years. In April 2015 the LPSC staff and intervenors filed testimony in the LPSC business combination proceeding. The testimony recommended an extensive set of conditions that would be required in order to recommend that the LPSC find that the business combination is in the public interest. The LPSC staff’s primary concern appeared to be potential shifting in fuel costs between legacy Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Gulf States Louisiana customers. In May 2015, Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Gulf States Louisiana filed rebuttal testimony. After the testimony was filed with the LPSC, the parties engaged in settlement discussions that ultimately led to the execution of an uncontested stipulated settlement (“stipulated settlement”), which was filed with the LPSC in July 2015. Through the stipulated settlement, the parties agreed to terms upon which to recommend that the LPSC find that the business combination is in the public interest. The stipulated settlement, which was either joined or unopposed by all parties to the LPSC proceeding, represents a compromise of stakeholder positions and was the result of an extensive period of analysis, discovery, and negotiation. The stipulated settlement provides $107 million in guaranteed customer benefits. Additionally, the combined company will honor the 2013 Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Gulf States Louisiana rate case settlements, including the commitments that (1) there will be no rate increase for legacy Entergy Gulf States Louisiana customers for the 2014 test year, and (2) through the 2016 test year formula rate plan, Entergy Louisiana (as a combined entity) will not raise rates by more than $30 million, net of the $10 million rate increase included in the Entergy Louisiana legacy formula rate plan. The stipulated settlement also describes the process for implementing a fuel tracker mechanism that is designed to address potential effects arising from the shifting of fuel costs between legacy Entergy Louisiana and legacy Entergy Gulf States Louisiana customers as a result of the combination of those companies’ fuel adjustment clauses by reallocating such cost shifts as between customers on an after-the-fact basis. The calculation of the fuel tracker will be submitted annually in a compliance filing. The stipulated settlement also provides that Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana are permitted to defer certain external costs that were incurred to achieve the business combination’s customer benefits. The deferred amount, which shall not exceed $25 million, will be subject to a prudence review and amortized over a 10-year period. A hearing on the stipulated settlement in the LPSC proceeding was held in July 2015. Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Gulf States Louisiana have requested that the LPSC issue its decision regarding the business combination in August 2015.
Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Gulf States Louisiana filed applications with the FERC requesting authorization for the business combination and Entergy Louisiana and Entergy New Orleans filed applications with the FERC requesting authorization of the Algiers asset transfer. The FERC has issued orders authorizing the business combination and the Algiers asset transfer.
122
Table of Contents
Entergy Louisiana, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Results of Operations
Net Income
Second Quarter 2015 Compared to Second Quarter 2014
Net income increased $5.4 million primarily due to higher net revenue, partially offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses, higher depreciation and amortization expenses, higher interest expense, lower other income, and a higher effective income tax rate.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2014
Net income increased $19.2 million primarily due to higher net revenue, partially offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses, higher depreciation and amortization expenses, higher interest expense, and lower other income.
Net Revenue
Second Quarter 2015 Compared to Second Quarter 2014
Net revenue consists of operating revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale, 2) purchased power expenses, and 3) other regulatory credits. Following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing the second quarter 2015 to the second quarter 2014:
Amount
(In Millions)
2014 net revenue
$316.6
Retail electric price
29.9
Volume/weather
11.3
Net wholesale revenue
10.0
Other
1.6
2015 net revenue
$369.4
The retail electric price variance is primarily due to formula rate plan increases, as approved by the LPSC, effective December 2014 and January 2015. Entergy Louisiana’s formula rate plan increases are discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K.
The volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of more favorable weather on residential and commercial sales, partially offset by a decrease in industrial usage. The decrease in industrial usage is primarily due to extended seasonal outages for existing large refinery customers, partially offset by new customers and expansion projects primarily in the chemicals industry.
The net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to the sale of generation from the Ninemile plant of 25% to Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and 20% to Entergy New Orleans, pursuant to a long-term power purchase agreement. The Ninemile plant was placed in service in December 2014.
123
Table of Contents
Entergy Louisiana, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2014
Net revenue consists of operating revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale, 2) purchased power expenses, and 3) other regulatory credits. Following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing the six months ended June 30, 2015 to the six months ended June 30, 2014:
Amount
(In Millions)
2014 net revenue
$607.8
Retail electric price
63.5
Net wholesale revenue
20.4
Volume/weather
13.5
Other
1.3
2015 net revenue
$706.5
The retail electric price variance is primarily due to formula rate plan increases, as approved by the LPSC, effective December 2014 and January 2015. Entergy Louisiana’s formula rate plan increases are discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K.
The net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to the sale of generation from the Ninemile plant of 25% to Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and 20% to Entergy New Orleans, pursuant to a long-term power purchase agreement. The Ninemile plant was placed in service in December 2014.
The volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase in unbilled sales volume. See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
Critical Accounting Estimates
- Unbilled Revenue
” in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues.
Other Income Statement Variances
Second Quarter 2015 Compared to Second Quarter 2014
Other operation and maintenance expenses increased primarily due to:
•
an increase of $6.5 million in fossil-fueled generation expenses primarily due to an overall higher scope of work done during plant outages as compared to prior year;
•
an increase of $6.5 million in nuclear generation expenses primarily due to an increased scope of work performed in 2015 and higher NRC fees;
•
an increase of $3.6 million in transmission expenses primarily due to an increase in the amount of transmission costs allocated by MISO. There is no effect on net income due to the recovery of these costs through the formula rate plan. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further information on the recovery of these costs;
•
an increase of $1.5 million due to the amortization effective December 2014 of costs related to the transition and implementation of joining the MISO RTO;
•
an increase of $1.3 million as a result of spending related to the Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Gulf States Louisiana business combination. See “
Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Gulf States Louisiana Business Combination
” above for discussion of the business combination; and
•
an increase of $1.3 million due to the amortization beginning December 2014 of implementation costs, severance costs, and curtailment and special termination benefits related to the human capital management strategic imperative. See the “
Human Capital Management Strategic Imperative
” section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis in the Form 10-K for further discussion.
124
Table of Contents
Entergy Louisiana, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Depreciation and amortization expenses increased primarily due to additions to plant in service, including the Ninemile Unit 6 project which was placed in service in December 2014.
Other income decreased primarily due to a decrease in allowance for equity funds used during construction due to a higher construction work in progress balance in 2014, which included the Ninemile Unit 6 project and $1.3 million of income received in 2014 related to the contribution of a substation to Entergy Louisiana. The decrease was partially offset by an increase of $4 million due to income earned on preferred membership interests purchased from Entergy Holdings Company with the proceeds received in August 2014 from the Act 55 storm cost financing. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the Act 55 storm cost financing.
Interest expense increased primarily due to:
•
the issuance of $250 million of 4.95% Series first mortgage bonds in November 2014;
•
the issuance of $190 million of 3.78% Series first mortgage bonds in July 2014; and
•
the decrease in the allowance for borrowed funds used during construction due to a higher construction work in progress balance in 2014, including the Ninemile Unit 6 project which was placed in service in December 2014.
The increase was partially offset by the retirement, at maturity, of $250 million of 1.875% Series first mortgage bonds in December 2014.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2014
Other operation and maintenance expenses increased primarily due to:
•
an increase of $12.3 million in fossil-fueled generation expenses primarily due to an overall higher scope of work done during plant outages as compared to prior year;
•
an increase of $11.4 million in nuclear generation expenses primarily due to an increased scope of work performed in 2015 and higher NRC fees;
•
an increase resulting from losses of $1.2 million on the sale of surplus diesel inventory in 2015 compared to gains of $3.8 million on the sale of surplus oil inventory in 2014;
•
an increase of $3.8 million in transmission expenses primarily due to an increase in the amount of transmission costs allocated by MISO. There is no effect on net income due to the recovery of these costs through the formula rate plan. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further information on the recovery of these costs;
•
an increase of $3.2 million due to the amortization effective December 2014 of costs related to the transition and implementation of joining the MISO RTO;
•
an increase of $2.6 million as a result of spending related to the Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Gulf States Louisiana business combination. See “
Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Gulf States Louisiana Business Combination
” above for discussion of the business combination; and
•
an increase of $2.5 million due to the amortization effective December 2014 of implementation costs, severance costs, and curtailment and special termination benefits related to the human capital management strategic imperative. See the “
Human Capital Management Strategic Imperative
” section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis in the Form 10-K for further discussion.
The increase was partially offset by a decrease of $1.5 million in compensation and benefits costs primarily due to a decrease in the accrual for incentive-based compensation, partially offset by an increase in net periodic pension and other postretirement benefit costs as a result of lower discount rates and changes in retirement and mortality assumptions. See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –
Critical Accounting Estimates
– Qualified Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits
” in the Form 10-K and Note 6 to the financial statements herein for further discussion of benefits costs.
125
Table of Contents
Entergy Louisiana, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Depreciation and amortization expenses increased primarily due to additions to plant in service, including the Ninemile Unit 6 project which was placed in service in December 2014.
Other income decreased primarily due to a decrease in allowance for equity funds used during construction due to a higher construction work in progress balance in 2014, which included the Ninemile Unit 6 project. The decrease was partially offset by an increase of $8.3 million due to income earned on preferred membership interests purchased from Entergy Holdings Company with the proceeds received in August 2014 from the Act 55 storm cost financing. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the Act 55 storm cost financing.
Interest expense increased primarily due to:
•
the issuance of $250 million of 4.95% Series first mortgage bonds in November 2014;
•
the issuance of $190 million of 3.78% Series first mortgage bonds in July 2014; and
•
the decrease in the allowance for borrowed funds used during construction due to a higher construction work in progress balance in 2014, including the Ninemile Unit 6 project which was placed in service in December 2014.
The increase was partially offset by the retirement, at maturity, of $250 million of 1.875% Series first mortgage bonds in December 2014.
Income Taxes
The effective income tax rate was 31.5% for the second quarter 2015. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the second quarter 2015 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% was primarily due to book and tax differences related to the non-taxable income distributions earned on preferred membership interests, partially offset by state income taxes.
The effective income tax rate was 28.1% for the six months ended June 30, 2015. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2015 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% was primarily due to book and tax differences related to the non-taxable income distributions earned on preferred membership interests and the reversal of a portion of the provision for uncertain tax positions resulting from the receipt of finalized tax and interest computations for the 2006-2007 audit from the IRS, partially offset by state income taxes. See Note 10 to the financial statements for a discussion of the finalized tax and interest computations for the 2006-2007 IRS audit.
The effective income tax rate was 27.5% for the second quarter 2014 and 26.8% for the six months ended June 30, 2014. The differences in the effective income tax rates for the second quarter 2014 and the six months ended June 30, 2014 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% were primarily due to book and tax differences related to the non-taxable income distributions earned on preferred membership interests and book and tax differences related to the allowance for equity funds used during construction, partially offset by state income taxes.
126
Table of Contents
Entergy Louisiana, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Flow
Cash flows for the
six months ended
June 30, 2015
and
2014
were as follows:
2015
2014
(In Thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
$157,553
$124,007
Cash flow provided by (used in):
Operating activities
362,275
200,795
Investing activities
(237,286
)
(431,369
)
Financing activities
(66,996
)
109,531
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
57,993
(121,043
)
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$215,546
$2,964
Operating Activities
Net cash flow provided by operating activities increased $161.5 million for the
six months ended
June 30, 2015
compared to the
six months ended
June 30, 2014
primarily due to increased net revenue, as discussed above, increased recovery of fuel costs compared to prior year, a decrease of $19.1 million in spending on nuclear refueling outages in 2015, and an increase of $9.1 million in income tax refunds in 2015. Entergy Louisiana received income tax refunds of $9.1 million in 2015 in accordance with the Entergy Corporation and Subsidiary Companies Intercompany Income Tax Allocation Agreement. The income tax refunds in 2015 resulted primarily from an Entergy Louisiana overpayment associated with the 2006-2007 IRS audit. See Note 10 to the financial statements for a discussion of the finalized tax and interest computations for the 2006-2007 IRS audit.
Investing Activities
Net cash flow used in investing activities decreased $194.1 million for the
six months ended
June 30, 2015
compared to the
six months ended
June 30, 2014
primarily due to:
•
deposit of bond proceeds with a trustee in June 2014. Entergy Louisiana issued $170 million of 5.0% Series first mortgage bonds in June 2014 and used the proceeds, in July 2014, to redeem, prior to maturity, its $70 million of 6.4% Series first mortgage bonds due October 2034 and its $100 million of 6.3% Series first mortgage bonds due September 2035;
•
a decrease in nuclear fuel activity because of variations from year to year in the timing and pricing of fuel reload requirements in the Utility business, material and services deliveries, and the timing of cash payments during the nuclear fuel cycle; and
•
a decrease in fossil-fueled generation construction expenditures primarily due to a decrease in spending on the Ninemile Unit 6 project which was place in service in December 2014.
The decrease was partially offset by:
•
money pool activity;
•
an increase in nuclear expenditures as a result of an increased scope of work performed in 2015; and
•
an increase in distribution construction expenditures due to an increased scope of work performed in 2015.
Increases in Entergy Louisiana’s receivable from the money pool are a use of cash flow, and Entergy Louisiana’s receivable from the money pool increased by $12.9 million for the
six months ended
June 30, 2015
compared to
127
Table of Contents
Entergy Louisiana, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
decreasing by $17.6 million for the
six months ended
June 30, 2014
. The money pool is an inter-company borrowing arrangement designed to reduce the Utility subsidiaries’ need for external short-term borrowings.
Financing Activities
Entergy Louisiana’s financing activities used $67 million of cash for the
six months ended
June 30, 2015
compared to providing $109.5 million of cash for the
six months ended
June 30, 2014
primarily due to:
•
the issuance of $170 million of 5.0% Series first mortgage bonds in June 2014;
•
the issuance of $40 million of 3.92% Series H Notes by the nuclear fuel company variable interest entity in February 2014;
•
the repayment of borrowings of $38.7 million on the nuclear fuel company variable interest entity’s credit facility in 2015 compared to an increase in borrowings $23.9 million in 2014; and
•
money pool activity.
The decrease was partially offset by common equity distributions of $135.8 million in 2014.
Increases in Entergy Louisiana’s money pool payable is a source of cash flow, and Entergy Louisiana’s payable to the money pool increased by $44.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014.
See Note 4 to the financial statements herein and Note 5 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for details
of long-term debt activity.
Capital Structure
Entergy Louisiana’s capitalization is balanced between equity and debt, as shown in the following table.
June 30,
2015
December 31,
2014
Debt to capital
52.2
%
53.8
%
Effect of excluding securitization bonds
(1.0
%)
(1.0
%)
Debt to capital, excluding securitization bonds (a)
51.2
%
52.8
%
Effect of subtracting cash
(1.8
%)
(1.3
%)
Net debt to net capital, excluding securitization bonds (a)
49.4
%
51.5
%
(a)
Calculation excludes the securitization bonds, which are non-recourse to Entergy Louisiana.
Net debt consists of debt less cash and cash equivalents. Debt consists of short-term borrowings and long-term debt, including the currently maturing portion. Capital consists of debt, preferred stock without sinking fund, and common equity. Net capital consists of capital less cash and cash equivalents. Entergy Louisiana uses the debt to capital ratios excluding securitization bonds in analyzing its financial condition and believes they provide useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating Entergy Louisiana’s financial condition. Entergy Louisiana uses the net debt to net capital ratio excluding securitization bonds in analyzing its financial condition and believes it provides useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating Entergy Louisiana’s financial condition because net debt indicates Entergy Louisiana’s outstanding debt position that could not be readily satisfied by cash and cash equivalents.
Uses and Sources of Capital
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
Liquidity and Capital Resources
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy Louisiana’s uses and sources of capital. Following are additional updates to the information provided in the Form 10-K.
128
Table of Contents
Entergy Louisiana, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Entergy Louisiana’s receivables from or (payables to) the money pool were as follows:
June 30,
2015
December 31,
2014
June 30,
2014
December 31,
2013
(In Thousands)
$14,526
$1,649
($44,239)
$17,648
See Note 4 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a description of the money pool.
Entergy Louisiana has a credit facility in the amount of $200 million scheduled to expire in March 2019. The credit facility allows Entergy Louisiana to issue letters of credit against 50% of the borrowing capacity of the facility. As of
June 30, 2015
, there were no cash borrowings and $3 million of letters of credit outstanding under the credit facility. In addition, Entergy Louisiana is a party to an uncommitted letter of credit facility as a means to post collateral to support its obligations under MISO. As of
June 30, 2015
, a $1 million letter of credit was outstanding under Entergy Louisiana’s uncommitted letter of credit facility. See Note 4 to the financial statements herein for additional discussion of the credit facilities.
The Entergy Louisiana nuclear fuel company variable interest entity has a credit facility in the amount of $90 million scheduled to expire in June 2016. As of
June 30, 2015
, $7.4 million in letters of credit were outstanding under the credit facility to support a like amount of commercial paper issued by the Entergy Louisiana nuclear fuel company variable interest entity. See Note 4 to the financial statements herein for additional discussion of the nuclear fuel company variable interest entity credit facility.
State and Local Rate Regulation and Fuel-Cost Recovery
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –
State and Local Rate Regulation and Fuel Cost Recovery
”
in the Form 10-K for a discussion of state and local rate regulation and fuel cost recovery. The following is an update to that discussion.
Retail Rates
Filings with the LPSC
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –
State and Local Rate Regulation and Fuel Cost Recovery
- Retail Rates -
Filings with the LPSC
”
in the Form 10-K for a discussion of
Waterford 3 replacement steam generator project prudence review.
Fuel and purchased power cost recovery
In July 2014 the LPSC authorized its staff to initiate an audit of Entergy Louisiana’s fuel adjustment clause filings. The audit includes a review of the reasonableness of charges flowed by Entergy Louisiana through its fuel adjustment clause for the period from 2010 through 2013. Discovery commenced in July 2015.
Algiers Asset Transfer
As discussed in the Form 10-K, in October 2014 Entergy Louisiana and Entergy New Orleans filed an application with the City Council seeking authorization to undertake a transaction that would result in the transfer from Entergy Louisiana to Entergy New Orleans of certain assets that currently serve Entergy Louisiana’s customers in Algiers. In April 2015 the FERC issued an order approving the Algiers assets transfer. In May 2015 the parties filed a settlement agreement authorizing the Algiers assets transfer and the settlement agreement was approved by a City Council resolution in May 2015. Entergy Louisiana expects to transfer the Algiers assets to Entergy New Orleans in September 2015.
129
Table of Contents
Entergy Louisiana, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Industrial and Commercial Customers
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –
Industrial and Commercial Customers
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of industrial and commercial customers.
Federal Regulation
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –
Federal Regulation
”
in the Form 10-K for a discussion of federal regulation.
Nuclear Matters
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
Nuclear Matters
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of nuclear matters.
Environmental Risks
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
Environmental Risks
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of environmental risks.
Critical Accounting Estimates
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
Critical Accounting Estimates
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the estimates and judgments necessary in Entergy Louisiana’s accounting for nuclear decommissioning costs, unbilled revenue, and qualified pension and other postretirement benefits.
130
Table of Contents
ENTERGY LOUISIANA, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended
Six Months Ended
2015
2014
2015
2014
(In Thousands)
(In Thousands)
OPERATING REVENUES
Electric
$667,624
$736,408
$1,307,718
$1,359,902
OPERATING EXPENSES
Operation and Maintenance:
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
132,545
168,820
275,489
259,607
Purchased power
170,583
258,624
333,580
507,743
Nuclear refueling outage expenses
6,326
7,763
12,751
16,641
Other operation and maintenance
140,771
119,648
269,625
228,770
Decommissioning
6,439
6,123
12,798
12,169
Taxes other than income taxes
19,491
19,745
40,512
39,490
Depreciation and amortization
71,165
63,146
139,243
125,521
Other regulatory credits - net
(4,863
)
(7,637
)
(7,834
)
(15,272
)
TOTAL
542,457
636,232
1,076,164
1,174,669
OPERATING INCOME
125,167
100,176
231,554
185,233
OTHER INCOME
Allowance for equity funds used during construction
2,953
9,216
6,382
18,093
Interest and investment income
25,703
21,086
52,108
42,264
Miscellaneous - net
(2,781
)
1,311
(2,244
)
1,142
TOTAL
25,875
31,613
56,246
61,499
INTEREST EXPENSE
Interest expense
43,113
40,686
86,454
81,375
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction
(1,606
)
(5,053
)
(3,467
)
(9,516
)
TOTAL
41,507
35,633
82,987
71,859
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES
109,535
96,156
204,813
174,873
Income taxes
34,517
26,489
57,531
46,828
NET INCOME
75,018
69,667
147,282
128,045
Preferred dividend requirements and other
1,738
1,757
3,475
3,494
EARNINGS APPLICABLE TO COMMON EQUITY
$73,280
$67,910
$143,807
$124,551
See Notes to Financial Statements.
131
Table of Contents
ENTERGY LOUISIANA, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended
Six Months Ended
2015
2014
2015
2014
(In Thousands)
(In Thousands)
Net Income
$75,018
$69,667
$147,282
$128,045
Other comprehensive loss
Pension and other postretirement liabilities
(net of tax benefit of $17, $180, $18, and $344)
(26
)
(287
)
(68
)
(589
)
Other comprehensive loss
(26
)
(287
)
(68
)
(589
)
Comprehensive Income
$74,992
$69,380
$147,214
$127,456
See Notes to Financial Statements.
132
Table of Contents
ENTERGY LOUISIANA, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014
(Unaudited)
2015
2014
(In Thousands)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income
$147,282
$128,045
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flow provided by operating activities:
Depreciation, amortization, and decommissioning, including nuclear fuel amortization
189,007
171,002
Deferred income taxes, investment tax credits, and non-current taxes accrued
119,183
109,479
Changes in working capital:
Receivables
(42,629
)
(21,077
)
Fuel inventory
5,065
4,232
Accounts payable
17,321
10,293
Prepaid taxes and taxes accrued
(21,331
)
(32,514
)
Interest accrued
3,034
(2,246
)
Deferred fuel costs
(30,399
)
(75,281
)
Other working capital accounts
(4,387
)
(31,951
)
Changes in provisions for estimated losses
(3,539
)
73
Changes in other regulatory assets
26,275
(2,765
)
Changes in other regulatory liabilities
(12,826
)
7,356
Changes in pension and other postretirement liabilities
(16,761
)
(13,895
)
Other
(13,020
)
(49,956
)
Net cash flow provided by operating activities
362,275
200,795
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Construction expenditures
(214,674
)
(233,235
)
Allowance for equity funds used during construction
6,382
18,093
Nuclear fuel purchases
(21,813
)
(108,015
)
Proceeds from the sale of nuclear fuel
17,070
46,045
Changes to securitization account
9
1,122
Proceeds from nuclear decommissioning trust fund sales
11,769
29,659
Investment in nuclear decommissioning trust funds
(18,062
)
(34,174
)
Changes in money pool receivable - net
(12,877
)
17,648
Changes in other investments - net
(5,090
)
(168,512
)
Net cash flow used in investing activities
(237,286
)
(431,369
)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt
—
208,147
Retirement of long-term debt
(25,368
)
(27,472
)
Changes in credit borrowings - net
(38,666
)
23,865
Change in money pool payable - net
—
44,239
Distributions paid:
Common equity
—
(135,823
)
Preferred membership interests
(3,475
)
(3,475
)
Other
513
50
Net cash flow provided by (used in) financing activities
(66,996
)
109,531
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
57,993
(121,043
)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
157,553
124,007
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$215,546
$2,964
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid (received) during the period for:
Interest - net of amount capitalized
$81,052
$80,790
Income taxes
($9,593
)
($495
)
See Notes to Financial Statements.
133
Table of Contents
ENTERGY LOUISIANA, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014
(Unaudited)
2015
2014
(In Thousands)
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents:
Cash
$199
$431
Temporary cash investments
215,347
157,122
Total cash and cash equivalents
215,546
157,553
Accounts receivable:
Customer
135,708
124,125
Allowance for doubtful accounts
(2,974
)
(984
)
Associated companies
66,615
48,474
Other
15,313
9,150
Accrued unbilled revenues
110,282
88,673
Total accounts receivable
324,944
269,438
Accumulated deferred income taxes
13,195
74,558
Fuel inventory
25,886
30,951
Materials and supplies - at average cost
165,283
154,295
Deferred nuclear refueling outage costs
9,970
23,067
Prepaid taxes
20,471
—
Prepayments and other
43,424
24,962
TOTAL
818,719
734,824
OTHER PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS
Investment in affiliate preferred membership interests
1,034,695
1,034,696
Decommissioning trust funds
390,198
383,615
Storm reserve escrow account
200,143
200,053
Non-utility property - at cost (less accumulated depreciation)
124
214
TOTAL
1,625,160
1,618,578
UTILITY PLANT
Electric
9,803,741
9,627,495
Property under capital lease
334,716
334,716
Construction work in progress
203,251
241,923
Nuclear fuel
130,756
162,721
TOTAL UTILITY PLANT
10,472,464
10,366,855
Less - accumulated depreciation and amortization
4,034,705
3,942,916
UTILITY PLANT - NET
6,437,759
6,423,939
DEFERRED DEBITS AND OTHER ASSETS
Regulatory assets:
Regulatory asset for income taxes - net
323,552
324,555
Other regulatory assets (includes securitization property of $125,946 as of June 30, 2015 and $135,538 as of December 31, 2014)
888,957
914,229
Deferred fuel costs
67,998
67,998
Other
45,594
45,182
TOTAL
1,326,101
1,351,964
TOTAL ASSETS
$10,207,739
$10,129,305
See Notes to Financial Statements.
134
Table of Contents
ENTERGY LOUISIANA, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014
(Unaudited)
2015
2014
(In Thousands)
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Currently maturing long-term debt
$28,431
$19,525
Short-term borrowings
7,367
46,033
Accounts payable:
Associated companies
66,105
74,692
Other
160,000
164,329
Customer deposits
94,003
93,010
Taxes accrued
—
860
Accumulated deferred income taxes
9,672
—
Interest accrued
47,406
44,372
Deferred fuel costs
20,033
50,432
Other
54,296
48,250
TOTAL
487,313
541,503
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accumulated deferred income taxes and taxes accrued
1,452,258
1,406,507
Accumulated deferred investment tax credits
63,560
64,771
Other regulatory liabilities
533,258
546,084
Decommissioning
516,532
503,734
Accumulated provisions
208,704
212,243
Pension and other postretirement liabilities
514,019
530,844
Long-term debt (includes securitization bonds of $133,761 as of June 30, 2015 and $143,039 as of December 31, 2014)
3,302,958
3,337,054
Other
68,974
70,141
TOTAL
6,660,263
6,671,378
Commitments and Contingencies
EQUITY
Preferred membership interests without sinking fund
100,000
100,000
Member's equity
2,986,107
2,842,300
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
(25,944
)
(25,876
)
TOTAL
3,060,163
2,916,424
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
$10,207,739
$10,129,305
See Notes to Financial Statements.
135
Table of Contents
ENTERGY LOUISIANA, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014
(Unaudited)
Common Equity
Preferred
Membership
Interests
Member’s
Equity
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss
Total
(In Thousands)
Balance at December 31, 2013
$100,000
$2,885,287
($9,635
)
$2,975,652
Net income
—
128,045
—
128,045
Other comprehensive loss
—
—
(589
)
(589
)
Contributions from parent
—
1,052
—
1,052
Distributions declared on common equity
—
(135,823
)
—
(135,823
)
Distributions declared on preferred membership interests
—
(3,494
)
—
(3,494
)
Balance at June 30, 2014
$100,000
$2,875,067
($10,224
)
$2,964,843
Balance at December 31, 2014
$100,000
$2,842,300
($25,876
)
$2,916,424
Net income
—
147,282
—
147,282
Other comprehensive loss
—
—
(68
)
(68
)
Distributions declared on preferred membership interests
—
(3,475
)
—
(3,475
)
Balance at June 30, 2015
$100,000
$2,986,107
($25,944
)
$3,060,163
See Notes to Financial Statements.
136
Table of Contents
ENTERGY LOUISIANA, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
SELECTED OPERATING RESULTS
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended
Increase/
Description
2015
2014
(Decrease)
%
(Dollars In Millions)
Electric Operating Revenues:
Residential
$178
$196
($18
)
(9
)
Commercial
136
152
(16
)
(11
)
Industrial
213
274
(61
)
(22
)
Governmental
11
12
(1
)
(8
)
Total retail
538
634
(96
)
(15
)
Sales for resale:
Associated companies
83
51
32
63
Non-associated companies
1
10
(9
)
—
Other
46
41
5
12
Total
$668
$736
($68
)
(9
)
Billed Electric Energy Sales (GWh):
Residential
1,946
1,878
68
4
Commercial
1,499
1,467
32
2
Industrial
4,187
4,238
(51
)
(1
)
Governmental
125
124
1
1
Total retail
7,757
7,707
50
1
Sales for resale:
Associated companies
2,159
848
1,311
155
Non-associated companies
13
17
(4
)
(24
)
Total
9,929
8,572
1,357
16
Six Months Ended
Increase/
Description
2015
2014
(Decrease)
%
(Dollars In Millions)
Electric Operating Revenues:
Residential
$371
$396
($25
)
(6
)
Commercial
267
282
(15
)
(5
)
Industrial
424
480
(56
)
(12
)
Governmental
22
23
(1
)
(4
)
Total retail
1,084
1,181
(97
)
(8
)
Sales for resale:
Associated companies
155
121
34
28
Non-associated companies
3
16
(13
)
(81
)
Other
66
42
24
—
Total
$1,308
$1,360
($52
)
(4
)
Billed Electric Energy Sales (GWh):
Residential
4,193
4,291
(98
)
(2
)
Commercial
2,939
2,932
7
—
Industrial
8,369
8,279
90
1
Governmental
254
252
2
1
Total retail
15,755
15,754
1
—
Sales for resale:
Associated companies
3,933
2,066
1,867
90
Non-associated companies
52
97
(45
)
(46
)
Total
19,740
17,917
1,823
10
137
Table of Contents
ENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Results of Operations
Net Income
Second Quarter
2015
Compared to
Second Quarter
2014
Net income decreased slightly, by $0.3 million, primarily due to higher depreciation and amortization expenses and higher taxes other than income taxes, substantially offset by lower other operation and maintenance expenses.
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2015
Compared to
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2014
Net income decreased by $1.2 million primarily due to higher depreciation and amortization expenses, higher other operation and maintenance expenses, and higher taxes other than income taxes, substantially offset by higher net revenue.
Net Revenue
Second Quarter
2015
Compared to
Second Quarter
2014
Net revenue consists of operating revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale, 2) purchased power expenses, and 3) other regulatory charges (credits). Following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing the
second quarter
2015
to the
second quarter
2014
:
Amount
(In Millions)
2014 net revenue
$178.5
Volume/weather
7.4
Retail electric price
(3.4
)
MISO deferral
(2.9
)
Other
(0.7
)
2015 net revenue
$178.9
The volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase in sales volume during the unbilled sales period. See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
Critical Accounting Estimates
- Unbilled Revenue
” in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues.
The retail electric price variance is primarily due to a decrease of $7 million as a result of a change in the deferrals related to the realignment of certain costs between riders and base rates, partially offset by a $16 million net annual increase in revenues, effective February 2015, as a result of the MPSC order in the June 2014 rate case. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the rate case.
The MISO deferral variance is primarily due to the deferral in 2014 of the non-fuel MISO-related charges, as approved by MPSC. The deferral of non-fuel MISO-related charges is partially offset in other operation and maintenance expenses. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the recovery of non-fuel MISO-related charges.
138
Table of Contents
Entergy Mississippi, Inc.
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2015
Compared to
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2014
Net revenue consists of operating revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale, 2) purchased power expenses, and 3) other regulatory charges (credits). Following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing the
six months ended
June 30, 2015
to the
six months ended
June 30, 2014
:
Amount
(In Millions)
2014 net revenue
$341.4
Volume/weather
9.3
Retail electric price
8.8
MISO deferral
(5.4
)
Other
0.6
2015 net revenue
$354.7
The volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase in sales volume during the unbilled sales period. See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
Critical Accounting Estimates
- Unbilled Revenue
” in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues.
The retail electric price variance is primarily due to a $16 million net annual increase in revenues, effective February 2015, as a result of the MPSC order in the June 2014 rate case. The rate case included the realignment of certain costs from collection in riders to base rates. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the rate case.
The MISO deferral variance is primarily due to the deferral in 2014 of the non-fuel MISO-related charges, as approved by MPSC. The deferral of non-fuel MISO-related charges is partially offset in other operation and maintenance expenses. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the recovery of non-fuel MISO-related charges.
Other Income Statement Variances
Second Quarter
2015
Compared to
Second Quarter
2014
Other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to:
•
a decrease of $5.9 million in fossil-fueled generation expenses primarily due to Baxter Wilson (Unit 1) repair activities in 2014. See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
Baxter Wilson Plant Event
”
in the Form 10-K and below for a discussion of the Baxter Wilson plant event; and
•
a decrease of $4.6 million in storm damage accruals. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of storm cost recovery.
The decrease was partially offset by:
•
a $2.6 million loss recognized on the disposition of plant components;
•
an increase of $1.3 million in energy efficiency costs. These costs began in fourth quarter 2014 and are recovered through the energy efficiency rider having minimal effect on net income; and
•
several individually insignificant items.
Taxes other than income taxes increased primarily due to an increase in ad valorem taxes.
Depreciation and amortization expenses increased primarily due to additions to plant in service and higher depreciation rates in 2015, as approved by the MPSC.
139
Table of Contents
Entergy Mississippi, Inc.
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2015
Compared to
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2014
Other operation and maintenance expenses increased primarily due to:
•
an increase of $2.9 million in energy efficiency costs. These costs began in fourth quarter 2014 and are recovered through the energy efficiency rider having minimal effect on net income;
•
an increase of $2.8 million in fossil-fueled generation expenses primarily due to a higher scope of work done during plant outages in 2015 as compared to the same period in 2014 and higher long-term service agreement costs as a result of increased operation of the Hinds and Attala plants, partially offset by Baxter Wilson (Unit 1) repair activities in 2014. See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
Baxter Wilson Plant Event
”
in the Form 10-K and below for a discussion of the Baxter Wilson plant event;
•
a $2.6 million loss recognized on the disposition of plant components; and
•
several individually insignificant items.
The increase was partially offset by a decrease of $6.5 million in storm damage accruals. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of storm cost recovery.
Taxes other than income taxes increased primarily due to an increase in ad valorem taxes.
Depreciation and amortization expenses increased primarily due to additions to plant in service and higher depreciation rates in 2015, as approved by the MPSC.
Income Taxes
The effective income tax rate was 39.6% for the
second quarter
2015
and 39.4% for the
six months ended June 30, 2015
. The differences in the effective income tax rates for the second quarter 2015 and the six months ended June 30, 2015 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% were primarily due to state income taxes and certain book and tax differences related to utility plant items.
The effective income tax rate was 39.9% for the
second quarter
2014
and 39.8% for the
six months ended June 30, 2014
. The differences in the effective income tax rates for the second quarter 2014 and the six months ended June 30, 2014 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% were primarily due to state income taxes and certain book and tax differences related to utility plant items.
Baxter Wilson Plant Event
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
Baxter Wilson Plant Event
”
in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the Baxter Wilson plant event. During the first quarter 2015, Entergy Mississippi received $27.8 million of previously-accrued insurance proceeds with $12.7 million allocated to capital spending and $15.1 million allocated to operation and maintenance expenses.
140
Table of Contents
Entergy Mississippi, Inc.
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Flow
Cash flows for the
six months ended
June 30, 2015
and
2014
were as follows:
2015
2014
(In Thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
$61,633
$31
Cash flow provided by (used in):
Operating activities
174,329
94,099
Investing activities
(87,554
)
(76,313
)
Financing activities
(34,001
)
(942
)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
52,774
16,844
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$114,407
$16,875
Operating Activities
Net cash flow provided by operating activities increased $80.2 million for the
six months ended
June 30, 2015
compared to the
six months ended
June 30, 2014
primarily due to:
•
increased recovery of fuel costs compared to prior year;
•
$15.1 million in insurance proceeds received in the first quarter 2015 related to the Baxter Wilson plant event. See “
Baxter Wilson Plant Event
”
above and in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the Baxter Wilson plant event; and
•
timing of collections from customers.
The increase was partially offset by income tax payments of $0.6 million in the
six
months ended
June 30, 2015
compared to income tax refunds of $9.4 million in the
six
months ended
June 30, 2014
. Entergy Mississippi had income tax payments in accordance with the Entergy Corporation and Subsidiary Companies Intercompany Income Tax Allocation Agreement. The income tax payments in 2015 resulted primarily from final settlement of amounts outstanding associated with the 2006-2007 IRS audit. The 2014 income tax refunds were received in accordance with intercompany state income tax sharing arrangements. See Note 10 to the financial statements for a discussion of the finalized tax and interest computations for the 2006-2007 IRS audit.
Investing Activities
Net cash flow used in investing activities increased $11.2 million for the
six months ended
June 30, 2015
compared to the
six months ended
June 30, 2014
primarily due to:
•
an increase in transmission construction expenditures primarily due to a higher scope of work done compared to the same period in 2014;
•
an increase in fossil-fueled generation construction expenditures primarily due to a higher scope of work done during plant outages compared to the same period in 2014; and
•
cash collateral of $5 million posted in June 2015 to support Entergy Mississippi’s obligations related to MISO.
141
Table of Contents
Entergy Mississippi, Inc.
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
The increase was partially offset by $12.7 million of insurance proceeds received in the first quarter 2015 related to the Baxter Wilson Plant Event. See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
Baxter Wilson Plant Event
” above and in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the Baxter Wilson plant event.
Financing Activities
Net cash flow used in financing activities increased $33.1 million for the
six months ended
June 30, 2015
compared to the
six months ended
June 30, 2014
primarily due to $32.5 million in common stock dividends paid in 2015.
Capital Structure
Entergy Mississippi’s capitalization is balanced between equity and debt, as shown in the following table.
June 30, 2015
December 31, 2014
Debt to capital
50.8
%
51.2
%
Effect of subtracting cash
(2.9
%)
(1.5
%)
Net debt to net capital
47.9
%
49.7
%
Net debt consists of debt less cash and cash equivalents. Debt consists of short-term borrowings, capital lease obligations, and long-term debt, including the currently maturing portion. Capital consists of debt, preferred stock without sinking fund, and common equity. Net capital consists of capital less cash and cash equivalents. Entergy Mississippi uses the debt to capital ratio in analyzing its financial condition and believes it provides useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating Entergy Mississippi’s financial condition. Entergy Mississippi uses the net debt to net capital ratio in analyzing its financial condition and believes it provides useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating Entergy Mississippi’s financial condition because net debt indicates Entergy Mississippi’s outstanding debt position that could not be readily satisfied by cash and cash equivalents on hand.
Uses and Sources of Capital
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
Liquidity and Capital Resources
”
in the Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy Mississippi’s uses and sources of capital. Following are additional updates to the information provided in the Form 10-K.
Entergy Mississippi’s receivables from or (payables to) the money pool were as follows:
June 30, 2015
December 31,
2014
June 30, 2014
December 31,
2013
(In Thousands)
$7,736
$644
$6,796
($3,536)
See Note 4 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a description of the money pool.
Entergy Mississippi has four separate credit facilities in the aggregate amount of $102.5 million scheduled to expire in May 2016. No borrowings were outstanding under the credit facilities as of
June 30, 2015
. In addition, Entergy Mississippi is a party to uncommitted letter of credit facilities as a means to post collateral to support its obligations under MISO. As of
June 30, 2015
, a $6.5 million letter of credit was outstanding under one of Entergy Mississippi’s uncommitted letter of credit facilities. See Note 4 to the financial statements herein for additional discussion of the credit facilities.
142
Table of Contents
Entergy Mississippi, Inc.
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
State and Local Rate Regulation and Fuel-Cost Recovery
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
State and Local Rate Regulation and Fuel-Cost Recovery
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the formula rate plan and fuel and purchased power cost recovery. The following are updates to that discussion.
Fuel and purchased power recovery
Entergy Mississippi had a deferred fuel over-recovery balance of $58.3 million as of May 31, 2015, along with an under-recovery balance of $12.3 million under the power management rider. Pursuant to those tariffs, in July 2015, Entergy Mississippi filed for interim adjustments under both the energy cost recovery rider and the power management rider to flow through to customers the approximately $46 million net over-recovery over a six-month period.
Mississippi Attorney General Complaint
The Mississippi attorney general filed a complaint in state court in December 2008 against Entergy Corporation, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy Services, and Entergy Power alleging, among other things, violations of Mississippi statutes, fraud, and breach of good faith and fair dealing, and requesting an accounting and restitution. The complaint is wide ranging and relates to tariffs and procedures under which Entergy Mississippi purchases power not generated in Mississippi to meet electricity demand. Entergy believes the complaint is unfounded. In December 2008 the defendant Entergy companies removed the Attorney General’s lawsuit to U.S. District Court in Jackson, Mississippi. The Mississippi attorney general moved to remand the matter to state court. In August 2012 the District Court issued an opinion denying the Attorney General’s motion for remand, finding that the District Court has subject matter jurisdiction under the Class Action Fairness Act.
The defendant Entergy companies answered the complaint and filed a counterclaim for relief based upon the Mississippi Public Utilities Act and the Federal Power Act. In May 2009 the defendant Entergy companies filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings asserting grounds of federal preemption, the exclusive jurisdiction of the MPSC, and factual errors in the Attorney General’s complaint. In September 2012 the District Court heard oral argument on Entergy’s motion for judgment on the pleadings.
In January 2014 the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in which it held that cases brought by attorneys general as the sole plaintiff to enforce state laws were not considered “mass actions” under the Class Action Fairness Act, so as to establish federal subject matter jurisdiction. One day later the Attorney General renewed his motion to remand the Entergy case back to state court, citing the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision. The defendant Entergy companies responded to that motion reiterating the additional grounds asserted for federal question jurisdiction, and the District Court held oral argument on the renewed motion to remand in February 2014. In April 2015 the District Court entered an order denying the renewed motion to remand, holding that the District Court has federal question subject matter jurisdiction. The Attorney General appealed to the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals the denial of the motion to remand. In July 2015 the Fifth Circuit issued an order denying the appeal, and the Attorney General subsequently filed a petition for rehearing of the request for interlocutory appeal. The case remains pending in federal district court, awaiting a ruling on the Entergy companies’ motion for judgment on the pleadings.
Federal Regulation
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –
Federal Regulation
”
in the Form 10-K for a discussion of federal regulation.
Nuclear Matters
See “
Nuclear Matters
” section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis in the Form 10-K for a discussion of nuclear matters.
143
Table of Contents
Entergy Mississippi, Inc.
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Environmental Risks
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –
Environmental Risks
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of environmental risks.
Critical Accounting Estimates
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
Critical Accounting Estimates
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the estimates and judgments necessary in Entergy Mississippi’s accounting for unbilled revenue and qualified pension and other postretirement benefits.
144
Table of Contents
ENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, INC.
INCOME STATEMENTS
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended
Six Months Ended
2015
2014
2015
2014
(In Thousands)
(In Thousands)
OPERATING REVENUES
Electric
$344,975
$370,638
$705,790
$718,834
OPERATING EXPENSES
Operation and Maintenance:
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
64,208
76,513
154,819
133,828
Purchased power
95,763
119,736
187,921
247,788
Other operation and maintenance
65,114
69,342
130,186
124,700
Taxes other than income taxes
23,117
21,733
48,137
44,000
Depreciation and amortization
32,599
28,394
63,429
56,505
Other regulatory charges (credits) - net
6,088
(4,143
)
8,373
(4,182
)
TOTAL
286,889
311,575
592,865
602,639
OPERATING INCOME
58,086
59,063
112,925
116,195
OTHER INCOME
Allowance for equity funds used during construction
610
414
1,381
849
Interest and investment income
27
326
55
664
Miscellaneous - net
(1,130
)
(1,414
)
(1,932
)
(2,253
)
TOTAL
(493
)
(674
)
(496
)
(740
)
INTEREST EXPENSE
Interest expense
14,391
14,396
28,637
28,824
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction
(324
)
(214
)
(741
)
(442
)
TOTAL
14,067
14,182
27,896
28,382
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES
43,526
44,207
84,533
87,073
Income taxes
17,247
17,643
33,319
34,670
NET INCOME
26,279
26,564
51,214
52,403
Preferred dividend requirements and other
707
707
1,414
1,414
EARNINGS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCK
$25,572
$25,857
$49,800
$50,989
See Notes to Financial Statements.
145
Table of Contents
(page left blank intentionally)
146
Table of Contents
ENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, INC.
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014
(Unaudited)
2015
2014
(In Thousands)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income
$51,214
$52,403
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flow provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization
63,429
56,505
Deferred income taxes, investment tax credits, and non-current taxes accrued
(25,582
)
7,510
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Receivables
14,406
(9,741
)
Fuel inventory
(7,318
)
4,379
Accounts payable
(11,972
)
3,744
Taxes accrued
30,554
7,321
Interest accrued
(3,304
)
1,318
Deferred fuel costs
58,395
(16,537
)
Other working capital accounts
(6,027
)
(1,672
)
Provisions for estimated losses
(203
)
4,908
Other regulatory assets
22,799
(2,807
)
Pension and other postretirement liabilities
(8,971
)
(12,798
)
Other assets and liabilities
(3,091
)
(434
)
Net cash flow provided by operating activities
174,329
94,099
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Construction expenditures
(89,581
)
(70,364
)
Allowance for equity funds used during construction
1,381
849
Insurance proceeds
12,745
—
Changes in money pool receivable - net
(7,092
)
(6,796
)
Increase in other investments
(5,000
)
—
Other
(7
)
(2
)
Net cash flow used in investing activities
(87,554
)
(76,313
)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt
—
99,008
Retirement of long-term debt
—
(95,000
)
Change in money pool payable - net
—
(3,536
)
Dividends paid:
Common stock
(32,500
)
—
Preferred stock
(1,414
)
(1,414
)
Other
(87
)
—
Net cash flow used in financing activities
(34,001
)
(942
)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
52,774
16,844
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
61,633
31
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$114,407
$16,875
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid (received) during the period for:
Interest - net of amount capitalized
$30,637
$26,142
Income taxes
$597
($9,440
)
See Notes to Financial Statements.
147
Table of Contents
ENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, INC.
BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014
(Unaudited)
2015
2014
(In Thousands)
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents:
Cash
$1,068
$1,223
Temporary cash investments
113,339
60,410
Total cash and cash equivalents
114,407
61,633
Accounts receivable:
Customer
74,802
78,593
Allowance for doubtful accounts
(873
)
(873
)
Associated companies
15,602
21,233
Other
10,493
42,009
Accrued unbilled revenues
64,253
43,374
Total accounts receivable
164,277
184,336
Accumulated deferred income taxes
—
5,198
Fuel inventory - at average cost
50,054
42,736
Materials and supplies - at average cost
38,520
37,741
Prepayments and other
15,968
7,315
TOTAL
383,226
338,959
OTHER PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS
Non-utility property - at cost (less accumulated depreciation)
4,633
4,642
Escrow accounts
41,758
41,752
TOTAL
46,391
46,394
UTILITY PLANT
Electric
4,007,510
3,999,918
Property under capital lease
3,576
4,185
Construction work in progress
55,214
67,514
TOTAL UTILITY PLANT
4,066,300
4,071,617
Less - accumulated depreciation and amortization
1,490,636
1,516,540
UTILITY PLANT - NET
2,575,664
2,555,077
DEFERRED DEBITS AND OTHER ASSETS
Regulatory assets:
Regulatory asset for income taxes - net
43,221
49,306
Other regulatory assets
348,033
364,747
Other
20,720
19,121
TOTAL
411,974
433,174
TOTAL ASSETS
$3,417,255
$3,373,604
See Notes to Financial Statements.
148
Table of Contents
ENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, INC.
BALANCE SHEETS
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014
(Unaudited)
2015
2014
(In Thousands)
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Currently maturing long-term debt
$125,000
$—
Accounts payable:
Associated companies
43,147
49,832
Other
51,148
63,300
Customer deposits
80,049
77,753
Taxes accrued
84,119
53,565
Accumulated deferred income taxes
1,884
—
Interest accrued
19,868
23,172
Deferred fuel costs
60,589
2,194
Other
23,691
17,533
TOTAL
489,495
287,349
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accumulated deferred income taxes and taxes accrued
758,601
800,374
Accumulated deferred investment tax credits
10,830
6,370
Asset retirement cost liabilities
8,027
6,786
Accumulated provisions
49,939
50,142
Pension and other postretirement liabilities
126,187
135,156
Long-term debt
933,900
1,058,838
Other
10,425
16,038
TOTAL
1,897,909
2,073,704
Commitments and Contingencies
Preferred stock without sinking fund
50,381
50,381
COMMON EQUITY
Common stock, no par value, authorized 12,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 8,666,357 shares in 2015 and 2014
199,326
199,326
Capital stock expense and other
(690
)
(690
)
Retained earnings
780,834
763,534
TOTAL
979,470
962,170
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
$3,417,255
$3,373,604
See Notes to Financial Statements.
149
Table of Contents
ENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, INC.
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN COMMON EQUITY
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014
(Unaudited)
Common Equity
Common
Stock
Capital Stock
Expense and
Other
Retained
Earnings
Total
(In Thousands)
Balance at December 31, 2013
$199,326
($690
)
$752,941
$951,577
Net income
—
—
52,403
52,403
Preferred stock dividends
—
—
(1,414
)
(1,414
)
Balance at June 30, 2014
$199,326
($690
)
$803,930
$1,002,566
Balance at December 31, 2014
$199,326
($690
)
$763,534
$962,170
Net income
—
—
51,214
51,214
Common stock dividends
—
—
(32,500
)
(32,500
)
Preferred stock dividends
—
—
(1,414
)
(1,414
)
Balance at June 30, 2015
$199,326
($690
)
$780,834
$979,470
See Notes to Financial Statements.
150
Table of Contents
ENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, INC.
SELECTED OPERATING RESULTS
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended
Increase/
Description
2015
2014
(Decrease)
%
(Dollars In Millions)
Electric Operating Revenues:
Residential
$119
$118
$1
1
Commercial
112
110
2
2
Industrial
41
42
(1
)
(2
)
Governmental
12
11
1
9
Total retail
284
281
3
1
Sales for resale:
Associated companies
21
56
(35
)
(63
)
Non-associated companies
3
3
—
—
Other
37
31
6
19
Total
$345
$371
($26
)
(7
)
Billed Electric Energy Sales (GWh):
Residential
1,100
1,133
(33
)
(3
)
Commercial
1,141
1,127
14
1
Industrial
544
562
(18
)
(3
)
Governmental
101
99
2
2
Total retail
2,886
2,921
(35
)
(1
)
Sales for resale:
Associated companies
433
795
(362
)
(46
)
Non-associated companies
55
41
14
34
Total
3,374
3,757
(383
)
(10
)
Six Months Ended
Increase/
Description
2015
2014
(Decrease)
%
(Dollars In Millions)
Electric Operating Revenues:
Residential
$273
$272
$1
—
Commercial
225
219
6
3
Industrial
81
80
1
1
Governmental
24
22
2
9
Total retail
603
593
10
2
Sales for resale:
Associated companies
43
84
(41
)
(49
)
Non-associated companies
6
7
(1
)
(14
)
Other
54
35
19
54
Total
$706
$719
($13
)
(2
)
Billed Electric Energy Sales (GWh):
Residential
2,588
2,710
(122
)
(5
)
Commercial
2,251
2,256
(5
)
—
Industrial
1,061
1,090
(29
)
(3
)
Governmental
199
198
1
1
Total retail
6,099
6,254
(155
)
(2
)
Sales for resale:
Associated companies
907
1,150
(243
)
(21
)
Non-associated companies
93
76
17
22
Total
7,099
7,480
(381
)
(5
)
151
Table of Contents
ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Algiers Asset Transfer
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
-
Algiers Asset Transfer
” in the Form 10-K.
As discussed in the Form 10-K, in October 2014 Entergy Louisiana and Entergy New Orleans filed an application with the City Council seeking authorization to undertake a transaction that would result in the transfer from Entergy Louisiana to Entergy New Orleans of certain assets that currently serve Entergy Louisiana’s customers in Algiers. In April 2015 the FERC issued an order approving the Algiers assets transfer. In May 2015 the parties filed a settlement agreement authorizing the Algiers assets transfer and the settlement agreement was approved by a City Council resolution in May 2015. Entergy Louisiana expects to transfer the Algiers assets to Entergy New Orleans in September 2015.
Results of Operations
Net Income
Second Quarter
2015 Compared to
Second Quarter
2014
Net income increased $4.1 million primarily due to higher net revenue.
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2015 Compared to
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2014
Net income increased $6.9 million primarily due to higher net revenue and lower other operation and maintenance expenses.
Net Revenue
Second Quarter
2015 Compared to
Second Quarter
2014
Net revenue consists of operating revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale, 2) purchased power expenses, and 3) other regulatory charges (credits). Following is an analysis of the changes in net revenue comparing the
second
quarter 2015 to the
second
quarter 2014:
Amount
(In Millions)
2014 net revenue
$62.3
Volume/weather
4.1
Other
0.4
2015 net revenue
$66.8
The volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 73 GWh, or 6%, in billed electricity usage, primarily in the residential and commercial sectors, due to the effect of more favorable weather in 2015 as compared to the same period in prior year and an increase of 2% in the average number of electric customers.
152
Table of Contents
Entergy New Orleans, Inc.
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2015 Compared to
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2014
Net revenue consists of operating revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale, 2) purchased power expenses, and 3) other regulatory charges (credits). Following is an analysis of the changes in net revenue comparing the six months ended June 30, 2015 to the six months ended June 30, 2014:
Amount
(In Millions)
2014 net revenue
$128.3
Volume/weather
4.9
Net gas revenue
(1.6
)
Other
1.2
2015 net revenue
$132.8
The volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase in unbilled sales volume, an increase of 31 GWh, or 1%, in billed electricity usage, primarily in the commercial and governmental sectors, and an increase of 2% in the average number of electric customers. See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
Critical Accounting Estimates
- Unbilled Revenue
” in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues.
The net gas revenue variance is primarily due to the effect of less favorable weather, primarily in the residential and commercial sectors in 2015 as compared to the same period in prior year.
Other Income Statement Variances
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2015 Compared to
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2014
Other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to:
•
a decrease of $2.3 million in fossil-fueled generation expenses resulting primarily from increases in 2014 to loss reserves related to asbestos claims, offset by a higher scope of plant outages in 2015; and
•
a decrease of $1.1 million in compensation and benefits costs primarily due to a decrease in the accrual for incentive-based compensation, partially offset by an increase in net periodic pension and other postretirement benefit costs as a result of lower discount rates and changes in retirement and mortality assumptions. See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –
Critical Accounting Estimates
– Qualified Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits
” in the Form 10-K and Note 6 to the financial statements herein for further discussion of benefits costs.
The decrease was partially offset by an increase of $1.2 million in transmission expenses primarily due to an increase in the amount of transmission costs allocated by MISO. There is no effect on net income as these costs are being collected through the MISO rider, as approved by the City Council.
Taxes other than income taxes decreased primarily due to a decrease in local franchise taxes resulting from lower electric and gas retail revenues as compared to the prior year and a decrease in ad valorem taxes. Franchise taxes have no effect on net income as these taxes are recovered through the franchise tax rider.
Other income increased primarily due to carrying costs on storm restoration costs related to Hurricane Issac, as approved by the City Council. See “
State and Local Rate Regulation
” below for further discussion of the securitization.
153
Table of Contents
Entergy New Orleans, Inc.
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Income Taxes
The effective income tax rate was 34.2% for the second quarter 2015 and 34.4% for the six months ended June 30, 2015. The differences in the effective income tax rates for the second quarter 2015 and the six months ended June 30, 2015 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% were primarily due to flow-through tax accounting, partially offset by state income taxes and certain book and tax differences related to utility plant items.
The effective income tax rate was 33.9% for the second quarter 2014 and 32.6% for the six months ended June 30, 2014. The differences in the effective income tax rates for the second quarter 2014 and the six months ended June 30, 2014 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% were primarily due to flow-through tax accounting, partially offset by state income taxes and certain book and tax differences related to utility plant items.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Flow
Cash flows for the
six months ended
June 30, 2015
and
2014
were as follows:
2015
2014
(In Thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
$42,389
$33,489
Cash flow provided by (used in):
Operating activities
31,330
15,802
Investing activities
(36,550
)
(32,106
)
Financing activities
(7,814
)
(513
)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
(13,034
)
(16,817
)
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$29,355
$16,672
Operating Activities
Net cash flow provided by operating activities increased $15.5 million for the
six months ended
June 30, 2015
compared to the
six months ended
June 30, 2014
primarily due to the payment of calendar year 2012 System Agreement bandwidth remedy receipts of $15 million to the City of New Orleans in June 2014 for use in the streetlight conversion program, as directed by the City Council.
Investing Activities
Net cash flow used in investing activities increased $4.4 million for the
six months ended
June 30, 2015
compared to the
six months ended
June 30, 2014
primarily due to:
•
an increase in transmission construction expenditures as a result of increased scope of work in 2015;
•
an increase in spending on information technology projects in 2015; and
•
an increase in distribution construction expenditures due to higher storm spending and increased scope of work in 2015.
Financing Activities
Net cash used in financing activities increased $7.3 million for the
six months ended
June 30, 2015
compared to the
six months ended
June 30, 2014
primarily due to $7.3 million in common stock dividends paid in 2015.
154
Table of Contents
Entergy New Orleans, Inc.
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Capital Structure
Entergy New Orleans’s capitalization is balanced between equity and debt, as shown in the following table. The decrease in the debt to capital ratio for Entergy New Orleans as of June 30, 2015 is primarily due to an increase in retained earnings.
June 30,
2015
December 31,
2014
Debt to capital
46.3
%
47.7
%
Effect of subtracting cash
(3.4
%)
(5.2
%)
Net debt to net capital
42.9
%
42.5
%
Net debt consists of debt less cash and cash equivalents. Debt consists of short-term borrowings and long-term debt, including the currently maturing portion. Capital consists of debt, preferred stock without sinking fund, and common equity. Net capital consists of capital less cash and cash equivalents. Entergy New Orleans uses the debt to capital ratio in analyzing its financial condition and believes it provides useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating Entergy New Orleans’s financial condition. Entergy New Orleans uses the net debt to net capital ratio in analyzing its financial condition and believes it provides useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating Entergy New Orleans’s financial condition because net debt indicates Entergy New Orleans’s outstanding debt position that could not be readily satisfied by cash and cash equivalents.
Uses and Sources of Capital
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
Liquidity and Capital Resources
”
in the Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy New Orleans’s uses and sources of capital. Following are updates to the information provided in the Form 10-K.
Entergy New Orleans’s receivables from the money pool were as follows:
June 30,
2015
December 31,
2014
June 30,
2014
December 31,
2013
(In Thousands)
$1,946
$442
$6,772
$4,737
See Note 4 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a description of the money pool.
Entergy New Orleans has a credit facility in the amount of $25 million scheduled to expire in November 2015. No borrowings were outstanding under the facility as of
June 30, 2015
. In addition, Entergy New Orleans is a party to an uncommitted letter of credit facility as a means to post collateral to support its obligations under MISO. As of
June 30, 2015
, a $9.7 million letter of credit was outstanding under Entergy New Orleans’s uncommitted letter of credit facility. See Note 4 to the financial statements herein for additional discussion of the credit facilities.
In May 2015, the City Council issued a financing order authorizing the issuance of securitization bonds to recover Entergy New Orleans’s Hurricane Isaac storm restoration costs of $31.8 million, including carrying costs, the costs of funding and replenishing the storm recovery reserve in the amount of $63.9 million, and approximately $3 million of up-front financing costs associated with the securitization. In July 2015, Entergy New Orleans Storm Recovery Funding I, L.L.C., a company wholly owned and consolidated by Entergy New Orleans, issued $98.7 million of storm cost recovery bonds. The bonds have a coupon of 2.67% and an expected maturity date of June 2024. Although the principal amount is not due until the date given above, Entergy New Orleans Storm Recovery Funding expects to make principal payments on the bonds over the next five years in the amounts of $11.4 million for 2016, $10.6 million for 2017, $11 million for 2018, $11.2 million for 2019, and $11.6 million for 2020. With the proceeds, Entergy New Orleans Storm Recovery Funding purchased from Entergy New Orleans the storm recovery property, which is the right to recover from customers through a storm recovery charge amounts sufficient to service the securitization bonds. The
155
Table of Contents
Entergy New Orleans, Inc.
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
storm recovery property will be reflected as a regulatory asset on the consolidated Entergy New Orleans balance sheet. The creditors of Entergy New Orleans do not have recourse to the assets or revenues of Entergy New Orleans Storm Recovery Funding, including the storm recovery property, and the creditors of Entergy New Orleans Storm Recovery Funding do not have recourse to the assets or revenues of Entergy New Orleans. Entergy New Orleans has no payment obligations to Entergy New Orleans Storm Recovery Funding except to remit storm recovery charge collections.
Union Power Station Power Purchase Agreement
In February 2015, Entergy New Orleans filed an application with the City Council seeking authorization to enter into a power purchase agreement, subject to certain conditions, with Entergy Gulf States Louisiana to purchase on a life-of-unit basis 20% of the capacity and related energy of the two power blocks of the Union Power Station that Entergy Gulf States Louisiana is seeking to purchase. In the application, Entergy New Orleans sought authorization from the City Council for full and timely cost recovery in rates for all costs associated with the power purchase agreement. In June 2015 the parties filed a settlement agreement regarding the power purchase agreement, and the settlement agreement was approved by a City Council resolution in June 2015. The City Council’s resolution approves, subject to certain conditions, the Union power purchase agreement as prudent and in the public interest and deems the costs of that power purchase agreement as eligible for recovery, with capacity costs being recoverable through a rider and energy-related costs being recoverable through the fuel adjustment clause. Long-term service agreement costs are recoverable through the fuel adjustment clause initially, but are subject to possible realignment to base rates in the next base rate case. The City Council approval also requires Entergy New Orleans to credit customer bills $4.8 million annually once the deactivation of Michoud Units 2 and 3 occurs.
In July 2015, Entergy Texas, together with other parties, filed a motion with the PUCT to dismiss Entergy Texas’s CCN application to acquire one of the four 495 MW power blocks at the Union Power Station. On July 30, 2015, the PUCT granted the motion to dismiss the CCN case. The power block originally allocated to Entergy Texas will be acquired by Entergy New Orleans, subject to City Council approval and the satisfaction of other conditions to close the transaction, for approximately $237 million. The acquisition by Entergy New Orleans would replace the power purchase agreement with Entergy Gulf States Louisiana that the City Council approved in June 2015. Entergy New Orleans will file an application for authorization to proceed with the acquisition and plans to seek City Council resolution by a date that would support closing the transaction by the end of 2015.
State and Local Rate Regulation
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –
State and Local Rate Regulation
”
in the Form 10-K for a discussion of state and local rate regulation. See also “
Liquidity and Capital Resources
-
Uses and Sources of Capital
-
Union Power Station Power Purchase Agreement
” above for discussion of the Union Power purchase agreement approved by the City Council in June 2015.
Federal Regulation
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –
Federal Regulation
”
in the Form 10-K for a discussion of federal regulation.
Nuclear Matters
See “
Nuclear Matters
” section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis in the Form 10-K for a discussion of nuclear matters.
Environmental Risks
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
Environmental Risks
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of environmental risks.
156
Table of Contents
Entergy New Orleans, Inc.
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Critical Accounting Estimates
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
Critical Accounting Estimates
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the estimates and judgments necessary in Entergy New Orleans’s accounting for unbilled revenue and qualified pension and other postretirement benefits.
157
Table of Contents
ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, INC.
INCOME STATEMENTS
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended
Six Months Ended
2015
2014
2015
2014
(In Thousands)
(In Thousands)
OPERATING REVENUES
Electric
$132,988
$147,941
$244,757
$288,168
Natural gas
17,506
22,048
52,637
68,388
TOTAL
150,494
169,989
297,394
356,556
OPERATING EXPENSES
Operation and Maintenance:
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
14,577
43,704
34,510
94,866
Purchased power
69,309
63,758
130,534
132,903
Other operation and maintenance
29,081
28,240
54,285
56,371
Taxes other than income taxes
10,797
11,479
22,187
24,614
Depreciation and amortization
8,270
9,741
18,063
19,206
Other regulatory charges (credits) - net
(190
)
205
(403
)
453
TOTAL
131,844
157,127
259,176
328,413
OPERATING INCOME
18,650
12,862
38,218
28,143
OTHER INCOME
Allowance for equity funds used during construction
248
205
495
560
Interest and investment income
12
21
37
38
Miscellaneous - net
303
(237
)
655
(584
)
TOTAL
563
(11
)
1,187
14
INTEREST EXPENSE
Interest expense
3,355
3,303
6,782
6,665
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction
(110
)
(101
)
(220
)
(274
)
TOTAL
3,245
3,202
6,562
6,391
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES
15,968
9,649
32,843
21,766
Income taxes
5,466
3,275
11,287
7,098
NET INCOME
10,502
6,374
21,556
14,668
Preferred dividend requirements and other
241
241
482
482
EARNINGS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCK
$10,261
$6,133
$21,074
$14,186
See Notes to Financial Statements.
158
Table of Contents
ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, INC.
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014
(Unaudited)
2015
2014
(In Thousands)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income
$21,556
$14,668
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flow provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization
18,063
19,206
Deferred income taxes, investment tax credits, and non-current taxes accrued
10,031
7,517
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Receivables
(64
)
4,023
Fuel inventory
1,938
1,931
Accounts payable
2,313
(8,262
)
Interest accrued
(351
)
(484
)
Deferred fuel costs
(9,403
)
(16,496
)
Other working capital accounts
(6,015
)
(10,322
)
Provisions for estimated losses
(188
)
5,805
Other regulatory assets
(20,270
)
2,491
Pension and other postretirement liabilities
(6,437
)
(6,333
)
Other assets and liabilities
20,157
2,058
Net cash flow provided by operating activities
31,330
15,802
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Construction expenditures
(31,991
)
(27,016
)
Allowance for equity funds used during construction
495
560
Changes in money pool receivable - net
(1,504
)
(2,035
)
Receipts from storm reserve escrow account
3
—
Payments to storm reserve escrow account
(3,553
)
(3,615
)
Net cash flow used in investing activities
(36,550
)
(32,106
)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Dividends paid:
Common stock
(7,250
)
—
Preferred stock
(482
)
(482
)
Other
(82
)
(31
)
Net cash flow used in financing activities
(7,814
)
(513
)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
(13,034
)
(16,817
)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
42,389
33,489
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$29,355
$16,672
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest - net of amount capitalized
$6,676
$6,694
Income taxes
$40
$—
See Notes to Financial Statements.
159
Table of Contents
ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, INC.
BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014
(Unaudited)
2015
2014
(In Thousands)
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash
$851
$1,006
Temporary cash investments
28,504
41,383
Total cash and cash equivalents
29,355
42,389
Accounts receivable:
Customer
37,963
35,663
Allowance for doubtful accounts
(361
)
(262
)
Associated companies
10,049
11,693
Other
2,161
3,223
Accrued unbilled revenues
18,538
16,465
Total accounts receivable
68,350
66,782
Accumulated deferred income taxes
10,035
8,562
Fuel inventory - at average cost
1,078
3,016
Materials and supplies - at average cost
13,398
12,650
Prepayments and other
16,898
6,887
TOTAL
139,114
140,286
OTHER PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS
Non-utility property at cost (less accumulated depreciation)
1,016
1,016
Storm reserve escrow account
21,588
18,038
TOTAL
22,604
19,054
UTILITY PLANT
Electric
933,568
936,862
Natural gas
232,234
228,979
Construction work in progress
19,583
18,866
TOTAL UTILITY PLANT
1,185,385
1,184,707
Less - accumulated depreciation and amortization
609,664
594,945
UTILITY PLANT - NET
575,721
589,762
DEFERRED DEBITS AND OTHER ASSETS
Regulatory assets:
Deferred fuel costs
4,080
4,080
Other regulatory assets
195,866
175,596
Other
5,767
5,345
TOTAL
205,713
185,021
TOTAL ASSETS
$943,152
$934,123
See Notes to Financial Statements.
160
Table of Contents
ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, INC.
BALANCE SHEETS
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014
(Unaudited)
2015
2014
(In Thousands)
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payable:
Associated companies
$33,145
$33,170
Other
24,062
22,435
Customer deposits
25,187
24,681
Interest accrued
3,187
3,538
Deferred fuel costs
18,994
28,397
Other
11,068
6,830
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES
115,643
119,051
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accumulated deferred income taxes and taxes accrued
214,589
199,241
Accumulated deferred investment tax credits
791
864
Regulatory liability for income taxes - net
16,283
20,640
Asset retirement cost liabilities
2,597
2,511
Accumulated provisions
25,689
25,877
Pension and other postretirement liabilities
56,003
62,440
Long-term debt
225,877
225,866
Gas system rebuild insurance proceeds
17,857
23,218
Other
6,194
6,610
TOTAL NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
565,880
567,267
Commitments and Contingencies
Preferred stock without sinking fund
19,780
19,780
COMMON EQUITY
Common stock, $4 par value, authorized 10,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 8,435,900 shares in 2015 and 2014
33,744
33,744
Paid-in capital
36,294
36,294
Retained earnings
171,811
157,987
TOTAL
241,849
228,025
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
$943,152
$934,123
See Notes to Financial Statements.
161
Table of Contents
ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, INC.
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN COMMON EQUITY
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014
(Unaudited)
Common Equity
Common
Stock
Paid-in
Capital
Retained
Earnings
Total
(In Thousands)
Balance at December 31, 2013
$33,744
$36,294
$136,245
$206,283
Net income
—
—
14,668
14,668
Preferred stock dividends
—
—
(482
)
(482
)
Balance at June 30, 2014
$33,744
$36,294
$150,431
$220,469
Balance at December 31, 2014
$33,744
$36,294
$157,987
$228,025
Net income
—
—
21,556
21,556
Common stock dividends
—
—
(7,250
)
(7,250
)
Preferred stock dividends
—
—
(482
)
(482
)
Balance at June 30, 2015
$33,744
$36,294
$171,811
$241,849
See Notes to Financial Statements.
162
Table of Contents
ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, INC.
SELECTED OPERATING RESULTS
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended
Increase/
Description
2015
2014
(Decrease)
%
(Dollars In Millions)
Electric Operating Revenues:
Residential
$44
$43
$1
2
Commercial
44
45
(1
)
(2
)
Industrial
8
9
(1
)
(11
)
Governmental
16
16
—
—
Total retail
112
113
(1
)
(1
)
Sales for resale:
Associated companies
12
27
(15
)
(56
)
Non-associated companies
—
1
(1
)
(100
)
Other
9
7
2
29
Total
$133
$148
($15
)
(10
)
Billed Electric Energy Sales (GWh):
Residential
428
394
34
9
Commercial
516
491
25
5
Industrial
115
114
1
1
Governmental
194
181
13
7
Total retail
1,253
1,180
73
6
Sales for resale:
Associated companies
242
433
(191
)
(44
)
Non-associated companies
1
1
—
—
Total
1,496
1,614
(118
)
(7
)
Six Months Ended
Increase/
Description
2015
2014
(Decrease)
%
(Dollars In Millions)
Electric Operating Revenues:
Residential
$87
$97
($10
)
(10
)
Commercial
82
88
(6
)
(7
)
Industrial
14
17
(3
)
(18
)
Governmental
29
31
(2
)
(6
)
Total retail
212
233
(21
)
(9
)
Sales for resale:
Associated companies
21
45
(24
)
(53
)
Non associated companies
—
4
(4
)
(100
)
Other
12
6
6
100
Total
$245
$288
($43
)
(15
)
Billed Electric Energy Sales (GWh):
Residential
921
935
(14
)
(1
)
Commercial
991
963
28
3
Industrial
217
220
(3
)
(1
)
Governmental
376
356
20
6
Total retail
2,505
2,474
31
1
Sales for resale:
Associated companies
435
700
(265
)
(38
)
Non-associated companies
5
11
(6
)
(55
)
Total
2,945
3,185
(240
)
(8
)
163
Table of Contents
ENTERGY TEXAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Results of Operations
Net Income
Second Quarter
2015
Compared to
Second Quarter
2014
Net income decreased $3.7 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses, partially offset by lower interest expense.
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2015
Compared to
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2014
Net income decreased slightly, by $0.3 million, primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses and higher taxes other than income taxes, substantially offset by higher net revenue and lower interest expense.
Net Revenue
Second Quarter
2015
Compared to
Second Quarter
2014
Net revenue consists of operating revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale, 2) purchased power expenses, and 3) other regulatory charges. Following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing the
second quarter
2015
to the
second quarter
2014
:
Amount
(In Millions)
2014 net revenue
$154.2
Fuel recovery
(4.1
)
Purchased power capacity
(3.2
)
Volume/weather
3.0
Transmission revenue
1.8
Other
1.8
2015 net revenue
$153.5
The fuel recovery variance is primarily due to a decrease in recoverable fuel expenses as a result of a change in the application of the fuel factor in the prior year. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of the PUCT fuel cost proceedings.
The purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to increased expenses due to contract changes and price changes for ongoing purchased power capacity.
The volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of weather on residential and commercial sales, partially offset by a decrease in industrial usage. The decrease in industrial usage is primarily due to extended seasonal outages for existing large refinery customers, partially offset by new customers in the transportation industry.
The transmission revenue variance is primarily due to an increase in the amount of transmission revenues allocated by MISO.
164
Table of Contents
Entergy Texas, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2015
Compared to
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2014
Net revenue consists of operating revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale, 2) purchased power expenses, and 3) other regulatory charges. Following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing the
six months ended
June 30, 2015
to the
six months ended
June 30, 2014
:
Amount
(In Millions)
2014 net revenue
$289.5
Volume/weather
5.2
Retail electric price
4.3
Net wholesale revenue
3.7
Transmission revenue
3.0
Purchased power capacity
(5.4
)
Rent from electric property
(3.1
)
Other
(0.1
)
2015 net revenue
$297.1
The volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase in unbilled sales volume, partially offset by a decrease of 228 GWh, or 3%, in billed electricity usage, primarily due to a decrease in industrial usage and the effect of weather. The decrease in industrial usage is primarily due to extended seasonal outages for existing large refinery customers, partially offset by new customers in the transportation industry. See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
Critical Accounting Estimates
- Unbilled Revenue
”
in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues.
The retail electric price variance is primarily due to an annual base rate increase of $18.5 million, effective April 2014, as a result of the PUCT’s order in the September 2013 rate case. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the rate case.
The net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to higher capacity revenue resulting from the purchased power agreements between Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Texas.
The transmission revenue variance is primarily due to an increase in the amount of transmission revenues allocated by MISO.
The purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to increased expenses due to contract changes and price changes for ongoing purchased power capacity.
The rent from electric property variance is primarily due to a decrease in right-of-way revenues in 2015 as compared to 2014.
Other Income Statement Variances
Second Quarter
2015
Compared to
Second Quarter
2014
Other operation and maintenance expenses increased primarily due to:
•
an increase of $5 million in fossil-fueled generation expenses primarily due to Lewis Creek dam repairs in 2015 and a higher scope of work done during plant outages compared to prior year; and
•
an increase of $1.9 million in transmission expenses primarily due to an increase in the amount of transmission costs allocated by MISO.
165
Table of Contents
Entergy Texas, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Interest expense decreased primarily due to the retirement, prior to maturity, of $150 million of 7.875% Series first mortgage bonds in June 2014, partially offset by the issuance of $250 million of 5.15% Series first mortgage bonds in May 2015 and the issuance of $135 million of 5.625% Series first mortgage bonds in May 2014.
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2015
Compared to
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2014
Other operation and maintenance expenses increased primarily due to:
•
an increase of $8.6 million in fossil-fueled generation expenses primarily due to Lewis Creek dam repairs in 2015 and a higher scope of work done during plant outages compared to prior year; and
•
an increase of $4.2 million in transmission expenses primarily due to an increase in the amount of transmission costs allocated by MISO.
The increase was partially offset by a decrease of $2.1 million in compensation and benefits costs primarily due to a decrease in the accrual for incentive-based compensation, partially offset by an increase in net periodic pension and other postretirement benefit costs as a result of lower discount rates and changes in retirement and mortality assumptions. See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –
Critical Accounting Estimates
– Qualified Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits
” in the Form 10-K and Note 6 to the financial statements herein for further discussion of benefits costs.
Taxes other than income taxes increased primarily due to an increase in ad valorem taxes, an increase in local franchise taxes resulting from an increase in the annual city franchise tax amortization, and an increase in payroll taxes.
Interest expense decreased primarily due to the retirement, prior to maturity, of $150 million of 7.875% Series first mortgage bonds in June 2014, partially offset by the issuance of $135 million of 5.625% Series first mortgage bonds in May 2014 and the issuance of $250 million of 5.15% Series first mortgage bonds in May 2015.
Income Taxes
The effective income tax rate was 38.7% for the second quarter 2015. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the second quarter 2015 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% was primarily due to certain book and tax differences related to utility plant items and state income taxes, partially offset by book and tax differences related to the allowance for equity funds used during construction.
The effective income tax rate was 36% for the six months ended June 30, 2015. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2015 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% was primarily due to certain book and tax differences related to utility plant items and the provision for uncertain tax positions, partially offset by state income taxes and book and tax differences related to the allowance for equity funds used during construction.
The effective income tax rate was 39.2% for the second quarter 2014 and 39.2% for the six months ended June 30, 2014. The differences in the effective income tax rates for the second quarter 2014 and for the six months ended June 30, 2014 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% were primarily due to certain book and tax differences related to utility plant items and state income taxes.
166
Table of Contents
Entergy Texas, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Flow
Cash flows for the
six months ended
June 30, 2015
and
2014
were as follows:
2015
2014
(In Thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
$30,441
$46,488
Cash flow provided by (used in):
Operating activities
131,842
128,331
Investing activities
(138,031
)
(72,936
)
Financing activities
10,449
(89,561
)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
4,260
(34,166
)
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$34,701
$12,322
Operating Activities
Net cash flow provided by operating activities increased $3.5 million for the
six months ended
June 30, 2015
compared to the
six months ended
June 30, 2014
primarily due to:
•
increased recovery of fuel costs compared to prior year;
•
the timing of collections from customers; and
•
a decrease of $3.9 million in interest paid in 2015 as compared to the same period in prior year resulting from a decrease in interest expense, as discussed above.
The increase was partially offset by System Agreement bandwidth remedy payments of $48.6 million received in the second quarter 2014 as a result of the compliance filing pursuant to the FERC’s February 2014 orders related to the bandwidth payments/receipts for the June - December 2005 period and an increase of $1.2 million in pension contributions in 2015. See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the System Agreement proceedings. See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –
Critical Accounting Estimates
–
Qualified Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits
” in the Form 10-K and Note 6 to the financial statements herein for a discussion of qualified pension and other postretirement benefits funding.
Investing Activities
Net cash flow used in investing activities increased $65.1 million for the
six months ended
June 30, 2015
compared to the
six months ended
June 30, 2014
primarily due to:
•
an increase in transmission construction expenditures primarily due to a greater scope of projects in 2015;
•
an increase in fossil-fueled generation construction expenditures primarily due to Lewis Creek dam repairs in 2015 and a greater scope of work done during outages in 2015; and
•
cash collateral of $12 million posted in June 2015 to support Entergy Texas’s obligations related to MISO.
167
Table of Contents
Entergy Texas, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Financing Activities
Entergy Texas’s financing activities provided $10.4 million of cash for the
six months ended
June 30, 2015
compared to using $89.6 million of cash for the
six months ended
June 30, 2014
primarily due to the following activity:
•
the issuance of $250 million of 5.15% Series first mortgage bonds in May 2015;
•
the retirement, prior to maturity, of $150 million of 7.875% Series first mortgage bonds in June 2014;
•
$40 million in common stock dividends paid in 2014;
•
the retirement of $200 million of 3.6% Series first mortgage bonds in June 2015; and
•
the issuance of $135 million of 5.625% Series first mortgage bonds in May 2014.
Capital Structure
Entergy Texas’s capitalization is balanced between equity and debt, as shown in the following table.
June 30,
2015
December 31,
2014
Debt to capital
61.8
%
62.4
%
Effect of excluding the securitization bonds
(10.7
%)
(11.8
%)
Debt to capital, excluding securitization bonds (a)
51.1
%
50.6
%
Effect of subtracting cash
(1.0
%)
(0.9
%)
Net debt to net capital, excluding securitization bonds (a)
50.1
%
49.7
%
(a)
Calculation excludes the securitization bonds, which are non-recourse to Entergy Texas.
Net debt consists of debt less cash and cash equivalents. Debt consists of long-term debt, including the currently maturing portion. Capital consists of debt and common equity. Net capital consists of capital less cash and cash equivalents. Entergy Texas uses the debt to capital ratios excluding securitization bonds in analyzing its financial condition and believes they provide useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating Entergy Texas’s financial condition because the securitization bonds are non-recourse to Entergy Texas, as more fully described in Note 5 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K. Entergy Texas also uses the net debt to net capital ratio excluding securitization bonds in analyzing its financial condition and believes it provides useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating Entergy Texas’s financial condition because net debt indicates Entergy Texas’s outstanding debt position that could not be readily satisfied by cash and cash equivalents on hand.
Uses and Sources of Capital
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
Liquidity and Capital Resources
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy Texas’s uses and sources of capital. Following are updates to the information provided in the Form 10-K.
Entergy Texas’s receivables from the money pool were as follows:
June 30,
2015
December 31,
2014
June 30,
2014
December 31,
2013
(In Thousands)
$2,258
$306
$4,671
$6,287
See Note 4 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a description of the money pool.
Entergy Texas has a credit facility in the amount of $150 million scheduled to expire in March 2019. The credit facility allows Entergy Texas to issue letters of credit against 50% of the borrowing capacity of the facility. As
168
Table of Contents
Entergy Texas, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
of
June 30, 2015
, there were no cash borrowings and $1.3 million of letters of credit outstanding under the credit facility. In addition, Entergy Texas is a party to an uncommitted letter of credit facility as a means to post collateral to support its obligations under MISO. As of
June 30, 2015
, a $14.5 million letter of credit was outstanding under Entergy Texas’s uncommitted letter of credit facility. See Note 4 to the financial statements herein for additional discussion of the credit facilities.
In May 2015, Entergy Texas issued $250 million of 5.15% Series first mortgage bonds due June 2045. Entergy Texas used the proceeds to pay, at maturity, its $200 million of 3.60% Series first mortgage bonds due June 2015 and for general corporate purposes.
Union Power Station Purchase Agreement
As discussed in the Form 10-K, in December 2014, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, and Entergy Texas entered into an asset purchase agreement to acquire the Union Power Station. The Union Power Station is a 1,980 MW (summer rating) power generation facility that consists of four power blocks, each rated at 495 MW. The purchase of the Union Power Station is contingent upon, among other things, obtaining necessary approvals, including cost recovery, from various federal and state regulatory and permitting agencies.
In December 2014, Entergy Texas filed its application for Certificate of Convenience and Necessity (CCN) with the PUCT seeking one of the two necessary PUCT approvals of the acquisition. In April 2015 intervenors, the Office of Public Utility Counsel, the Texas Industrial Energy Consumers, and the East Texas Electric Cooperative each filed testimony opposing the transaction. In May 2015, PUCT staff filed testimony opposing the transaction. The PUCT held a hearing in June 2015 on Entergy Texas’s CCN application, resulting in a PUCT request for additional testimony, which Entergy Texas and intervenors filed in June and July 2015. In a separate proceeding initiated in June 2015, Entergy Texas filed a rate application to seek cost recovery of its power block acquisition costs and other costs. In July 2015 the PUCT requested briefing on legal and policy issues related to post-test year adjustments and other rate-recovery issues in Entergy Texas’s base rate case. Based on the opposition to the acquisition of the power block, Entergy Texas determined it was appropriate to seek to dismiss the CCN filing and withdraw the rate case. In July 2015, Entergy Texas withdrew the rate case and, together with other parties, filed a motion with the PUCT to dismiss Entergy Texas’s CCN application. On July 30, 2015, the PUCT granted the motion to dismiss the CCN case. The power block originally allocated to Entergy Texas will be acquired by Entergy New Orleans, subject to City Council approval and the satisfaction of other conditions to close the transaction. The acquisition by Entergy New Orleans would replace the power purchase agreement with Entergy Gulf States Louisiana that the City Council approved in June 2015. Entergy New Orleans will file an application for authorization to proceed with the acquisition and plans to seek City Council resolution by a date that would support closing the transaction by the end of 2015.
In February 2015, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, and Entergy Texas filed a notification and report form pursuant to the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act (HSR Act) with the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) and Federal Trade Commission with respect to their planned acquisition of the Union Power Station. Union Power Partners, L.P. (UPP), the seller, also filed a notification and report form in February 2015. In March 2015 the DOJ requested additional information and documentary material from each of the purchasing companies and UPP. Also in March 2015, UPP, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, and Entergy Texas filed an application with the FERC requesting authorization for the transaction. In April 2015, Entergy Texas and Entergy Gulf States Louisiana made a filing with the FERC to request authorization to recover their portions of the expected positive acquisition adjustment associated with the acquisition of the Union Power Station. Also in April 2015, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, and Entergy Texas made a filing with the FERC for approval of their proposed accounting treatment of the amortization expenses relating to the acquisition adjustment. Closing is targeted to occur in late-2015.
169
Table of Contents
Entergy Texas, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
State and Local Rate Regulation and Fuel-Cost Recovery
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
State and Local Rate Regulation and Fuel-Cost Recovery
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of state and local rate regulation and fuel-cost recovery. The following is an update to that discussion.
Filings with the PUCT
In June 2015, Entergy Texas filed a rate case requesting a $75 million increase in its base rates and rider rates The rate case reflected a 10.2% return on common equity and was based on calendar year 2014 as the test year including pro forma adjustments to reflect the acquisition of Union Power Station Power Block 1, which is one of four units that comprise the Union Power Station near El Dorado, Arkansas. The rate case also includes a limited-term rate case expense rider to recover over a three-year period the deferred rate case expenses associated with this rate case. In July 2015 the PUCT requested briefing on legal and policy issues related to, among other things, the propriety of rate recovery for the Union Power transaction given the uncertainty of the actual closing date of the transaction and the commencement of the rate year, as well as Entergy Texas’s requirement for acceptable rate treatment as a condition to closing the transaction. Also in July 2015, in connection with the requested briefing, the PUCT staff and certain parties filed briefs concluding that Entergy Texas should not be permitted recovery for the Union Power Station purchase in the rate case. In July 2015, Entergy Texas filed its notice of withdrawal of its base rate case and the ALJs in the case dismissed the case from the dockets of the State Office of Administrative Hearings and the PUCT.
Fuel and Purchased Power Cost Recovery
In August 2014, Entergy Texas filed an application seeking PUCT approval to implement an interim fuel refund of approximately $24.6 million for over-collected fuel costs incurred during the months of November 2012 through April 2014. This refund resulted from the net of Entergy Texas’s then current fuel balance, bandwidth remedy payments that Entergy Texas received in May 2014 related to the June - December 2005 period, and bandwidth remedy payments that Entergy Texas made related to calendar year 2013 production costs. Also in August 2014, Entergy Texas filed an unopposed motion for interim rates to implement this refund for most customers over a two-month period commencing with September 2014. The PUCT issued its order approving the interim relief in August 2014 and Entergy Texas completed the refunds in October 2014. Parties intervened in this matter, and all parties agreed that the proceeding should be bifurcated such that the proposed interim refund would become final in a separate proceeding, which refund was approved by the PUCT in March 2015. In July 2015 certain parties filed briefs in the current proceeding asserting that Entergy Texas should refund to retail customers an additional $10.9 million in bandwidth remedy payments Entergy Texas received related to calendar year 2006 production costs. The current proceeding is pending.
Federal Regulation
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –
Federal Regulation
”
in the Form 10-K for a discussion of federal regulation.
Industrial and Commercial Customers
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –
Industrial and Commercial Customers
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of industrial and commercial customers.
Nuclear Matters
See “
Nuclear Matters
” section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis in the Form 10-K for a discussion of nuclear matters.
170
Table of Contents
Entergy Texas, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Environmental Risks
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
Environmental Risks
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of environmental risks.
Critical Accounting Estimates
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
Critical Accounting Estimates
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of unbilled revenue and qualified pension and other postretirement benefits.
171
Table of Contents
ENTERGY TEXAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended
Six Months Ended
2015
2014
2015
2014
(In Thousands)
(In Thousands)
OPERATING REVENUES
Electric
$402,921
$482,932
$814,132
$923,188
OPERATING EXPENSES
Operation and Maintenance:
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
50,360
89,258
124,167
140,226
Purchased power
180,843
223,213
355,048
458,039
Other operation and maintenance
66,062
58,979
122,587
110,189
Taxes other than income taxes
17,641
17,260
35,911
33,758
Depreciation and amortization
25,714
24,842
50,561
49,357
Other regulatory charges - net
18,237
16,222
37,781
35,405
TOTAL
358,857
429,774
726,055
826,974
OPERATING INCOME
44,064
53,158
88,077
96,214
OTHER INCOME
Allowance for equity funds used during construction
1,317
611
2,541
1,456
Interest and investment income (loss)
(193
)
172
(406
)
475
Miscellaneous - net
(178
)
(876
)
(114
)
(1,340
)
TOTAL
946
(93
)
2,021
591
INTEREST EXPENSE
Interest expense
21,562
22,948
42,558
45,609
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction
(862
)
(426
)
(1,656
)
(1,015
)
TOTAL
20,700
22,522
40,902
44,594
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES
24,310
30,543
49,196
52,211
Income taxes
9,420
11,958
17,715
20,461
NET INCOME
$14,890
$18,585
$31,481
$31,750
See Notes to Financial Statements.
172
Table of Contents
ENTERGY TEXAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014
(Unaudited)
2015
2014
(In Thousands)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income
$31,481
$31,750
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flow provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization
50,561
49,357
Deferred income taxes, investment tax credits, and non-current taxes accrued
(63,659
)
(52,824
)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Receivables
471
(34,427
)
Fuel inventory
(4,287
)
(1,025
)
Accounts payable
7,553
20,243
Prepaid taxes
69,446
61,678
Interest accrued
447
(499
)
Deferred fuel costs
252
3,803
Other working capital accounts
7,209
(8,354
)
Provisions for estimated losses
(1,093
)
75
Other regulatory assets
53,242
42,842
Pension and other postretirement liabilities
(9,860
)
(10,992
)
Other assets and liabilities
(9,921
)
26,704
Net cash flow provided by operating activities
131,842
128,331
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Construction expenditures
(133,344
)
(82,352
)
Allowance for equity funds used during construction
2,571
1,461
Increase in other investments
(12,000
)
—
Changes in money pool receivable - net
(1,952
)
1,616
Changes in securitization account
6,694
6,339
Net cash flow used in investing activities
(138,031
)
(72,936
)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt
247,005
131,436
Retirement of long-term debt
(235,260
)
(184,343
)
Dividends paid:
Common stock
—
(40,000
)
Other
(1,296
)
3,346
Net cash flow provided by (used in) financing activities
10,449
(89,561
)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
4,260
(34,166
)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
30,441
46,488
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$34,701
$12,322
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest - net of amount capitalized
$40,252
$44,178
Income taxes
$3,162
$2,572
See Notes to Financial Statements.
173
Table of Contents
ENTERGY TEXAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014
(Unaudited)
2015
2014
(In Thousands)
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents:
Cash
$1,592
$1,733
Temporary cash investments
33,109
28,708
Total cash and cash equivalents
34,701
30,441
Securitization recovery trust account
30,525
37,219
Accounts receivable:
Customer
66,904
70,993
Allowance for doubtful accounts
(499
)
(672
)
Associated companies
55,614
57,004
Other
11,541
10,985
Accrued unbilled revenues
44,594
38,363
Total accounts receivable
178,154
176,673
Deferred fuel costs
11,609
11,861
Accumulated deferred income taxes
5,120
669
Fuel inventory - at average cost
54,189
49,902
Materials and supplies - at average cost
36,198
33,892
Prepayments and other
28,384
29,211
TOTAL
378,880
369,868
OTHER PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS
Investments in affiliates - at equity
640
655
Non-utility property - at cost (less accumulated depreciation)
376
376
Other
19,911
19,085
TOTAL
20,927
20,116
UTILITY PLANT
Electric
3,860,855
3,761,847
Construction work in progress
130,737
125,425
TOTAL UTILITY PLANT
3,991,592
3,887,272
Less - accumulated depreciation and amortization
1,488,433
1,454,701
UTILITY PLANT - NET
2,503,159
2,432,571
DEFERRED DEBITS AND OTHER ASSETS
Regulatory assets:
Regulatory asset for income taxes - net
115,551
123,407
Other regulatory assets (includes securitization property of $490,009 as of June 30, 2015 and $521,424 as of December 31, 2014)
876,701
922,087
Long-term receivables - associated companies
25,351
26,156
Other
16,429
13,880
TOTAL
1,034,032
1,085,530
TOTAL ASSETS
$3,936,998
$3,908,085
See Notes to Financial Statements.
174
Table of Contents
ENTERGY TEXAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014
(Unaudited)
2015
2014
(In Thousands)
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Currently maturing long-term debt
$—
$200,000
Accounts payable:
Associated companies
94,429
91,481
Other
81,907
87,910
Customer deposits
43,552
44,308
Taxes accrued
71,295
1,849
Interest accrued
30,204
29,757
Other
15,724
18,238
TOTAL
337,111
473,543
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accumulated deferred income taxes and taxes accrued
978,847
1,046,618
Accumulated deferred investment tax credits
14,285
14,735
Other regulatory liabilities
5,386
5,125
Asset retirement cost liabilities
5,385
4,610
Accumulated provisions
11,125
12,218
Pension and other postretirement liabilities
101,109
111,011
Long-term debt (includes securitization bonds of $530,411 as of June 30, 2015 and $565,659 as of December 31, 2014)
1,493,432
1,278,931
Other
67,006
69,463
TOTAL
2,676,575
2,542,711
Commitments and Contingencies
COMMON EQUITY
Common stock, no par value, authorized 200,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 46,525,000 shares in 2015 and 2014
49,452
49,452
Paid-in capital
481,994
481,994
Retained earnings
391,866
360,385
TOTAL
923,312
891,831
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
$3,936,998
$3,908,085
See Notes to Financial Statements.
175
Table of Contents
ENTERGY TEXAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN COMMON EQUITY
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014
(Unaudited)
Common Equity
Common
Stock
Paid-in
Capital
Retained
Earnings
Total
(In Thousands)
Balance at December 31, 2013
$49,452
$481,994
$355,581
$887,027
Net income
—
—
31,750
31,750
Common stock dividends
—
—
(40,000
)
(40,000
)
Balance at June 30, 2014
$49,452
$481,994
$347,331
$878,777
Balance at December 31, 2014
$49,452
$481,994
$360,385
$891,831
Net income
—
—
31,481
31,481
Balance at June 30, 2015
$49,452
$481,994
$391,866
$923,312
See Notes to Financial Statements.
176
Table of Contents
ENTERGY TEXAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SELECTED OPERATING RESULTS
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended
Increase/
Description
2015
2014
(Decrease)
%
(Dollars In Millions)
Electric Operating Revenues:
Residential
$132
$141
($9
)
(6
)
Commercial
86
97
(11
)
(11
)
Industrial
88
121
(33
)
(27
)
Governmental
6
7
(1
)
(14
)
Total retail
312
366
(54
)
(15
)
Sales for resale:
Associated companies
69
95
(26
)
(27
)
Non-associated companies
3
3
—
—
Other
19
19
—
—
Total
$403
$483
($80
)
(17
)
Billed Electric Energy Sales (GWh):
Residential
1,233
1,169
64
5
Commercial
1,089
1,049
40
4
Industrial
1,719
1,860
(141
)
(8
)
Governmental
65
68
(3
)
(4
)
Total retail
4,106
4,146
(40
)
(1
)
Sales for resale:
Associated companies
1,484
1,423
61
4
Non-associated companies
32
18
14
78
Total
5,622
5,587
35
1
Six Months Ended
Increase/
Description
2015
2014
(Decrease)
%
(Dollars In Millions)
Electric Operating Revenues:
Residential
$288
$306
($18
)
(6
)
Commercial
176
185
(9
)
(5
)
Industrial
179
216
(37
)
(17
)
Governmental
12
13
(1
)
(8
)
Total retail
655
720
(65
)
(9
)
Sales for resale:
Associated companies
127
170
(43
)
(25
)
Non-associated companies
10
15
(5
)
(33
)
Other
22
18
4
22
Total
$814
$923
($109
)
(12
)
Billed Electric Energy Sales (GWh):
Residential
2,692
2,702
(10
)
—
Commercial
2,136
2,095
41
2
Industrial
3,328
3,582
(254
)
(7
)
Governmental
131
136
(5
)
(4
)
Total retail
8,287
8,515
(228
)
(3
)
Sales for resale:
Associated companies
2,672
2,453
219
9
Non-associated companies
125
154
(29
)
(19
)
Total
11,084
11,122
(38
)
—
177
Table of Contents
SYSTEM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Results of Operations
System Energy’s principal asset currently consists of an ownership interest and a leasehold interest in Grand Gulf. The capacity and energy from its 90% interest is sold under the Unit Power Sales Agreement to its only four customers, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, and Entergy New Orleans. System Energy’s operating revenues are derived from the allocation of the capacity, energy, and related costs associated with its 90% interest in Grand Gulf pursuant to the Unit Power Sales Agreement. Payments under the Unit Power Sales Agreement are System Energy’s only source of operating revenues.
Second Quarter
2015
Compared to
Second Quarter
2014
Net income decreased $4.1 million primarily due to lower operating income resulting from lower rate base as compared with the same period in the prior year.
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2015
Compared to
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2014
Net income decreased $3.2 million primarily due to lower operating income resulting from lower rate base as compared with the same period in the prior year.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Flow
Cash flows for the
six months ended
June 30, 2015
and
2014
were as follows:
2015
2014
(In Thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
$223,179
$127,142
Cash flow provided by (used in):
Operating activities
149,066
173,357
Investing activities
(49,867
)
(186,375
)
Financing activities
(211,331
)
(26,370
)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
(112,132
)
(39,388
)
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$111,047
$87,754
Operating Activities
Net cash flow provided by operating activities decreased $24.3 million for the
six months ended
June 30, 2015
compared to the
six months ended
June 30, 2014
primarily due to:
•
an increase in interest paid on the Grand Gulf sale-leaseback obligation as a result of the renewal in December 2013. See Note 10 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for details on the Grand Gulf sale-leaseback obligation; and
178
Table of Contents
System Energy Resources, Inc.
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
•
an increase of $19.7 million in income tax payments in 2015. System Energy had income tax payments of $25.3 million in 2015 in accordance with the Entergy Corporation and Subsidiary Companies Intercompany Income Tax Allocation Agreement. The income tax payments in 2015 resulted primarily from final settlement of amounts outstanding associated with the 2006-2007 IRS audit. See Note 10 to the financial statements for a discussion of the finalized tax and interest computations for the 2006-2007 IRS audit.
The decrease in cash provided was partially offset by a decrease in spending on nuclear refueling outages in 2015 as compared to the same period in 2014.
Investing Activities
Net cash flow used in investing activities decreased $136.5 million for the
six months ended
June 30, 2015
compared to the
six months ended
June 30, 2014
primarily due to:
•
fluctuations in nuclear fuel activity because of variations from year to year in the timing and pricing of fuel reload requirements in the Utility business, material and services deliveries, and the timing of cash payments during the nuclear fuel cycle; and
•
money pool activity.
Increases in System Energy’s receivable from the money pool are a use of cash flow and System Energy’s receivable from the money pool increased by $5.1 million for the
six months ended
June 30, 2015
compared to increasing by $27.2 million for the
six months ended
June 30, 2014
. The money pool is an inter-company borrowing arrangement designed to reduce the Utility subsidiaries’ need for external short-term borrowings.
Financing Activities
Net cash flow used by financing activities increased $185 million for the
six months ended
June 30, 2015
compared to the
six months ended
June 30, 2014
primarily due to:
•
an increase of $77 million in common stock dividends paid;
•
the System Energy nuclear fuel company variable interest entity redeemed, at maturity, $60 million of 5.33% Series G notes in April 2015;
•
borrowings of $17.1 million on the nuclear fuel company variable interest entity’s credit facility in 2015 compared to borrowings of $65.4 million on the nuclear fuel company variable interest entity’s credit facility in 2014; and
•
redemption in May 2015 of $35 million of System Energy’s $216 million of 5.875% Series governmental bonds due 2022.
The increase was partially offset by a decrease of $35.3 million in principal payments on the Grand Gulf sale-leaseback obligation in 2015 compared to 2014. See Note 10 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for details on the Grand Gulf sale-leaseback obligation.
Capital Structure
System Energy’s capitalization is balanced between equity and debt, as shown in the following table.
June 30, 2015
December 31, 2014
Debt to capital
44.6
%
45.7
%
Effect of subtracting cash
(4.6
%)
(8.8
%)
Net debt to net capital
40.0
%
36.9
%
179
Table of Contents
System Energy Resources, Inc.
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Net debt consists of debt less cash and cash equivalents. Debt consists of short-term borrowings and long-term debt, including the currently maturing portion. Capital consists of debt and common equity. Net capital consists of capital less cash and cash equivalents. System Energy uses the debt to capital ratio in analyzing its financial condition and believes it provides useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating System Energy’s financial condition. System Energy uses the net debt to net capital ratio in analyzing its financial condition and believes it provides useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating System Energy’s financial condition because net debt indicates System Energy’s outstanding debt position that could not be readily satisfied by cash and cash equivalents on hand.
Uses and Sources of Capital
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
Liquidity and Capital Resources
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of System Energy’s uses and sources of capital. Following are additional updates to the information provided in the Form 10-K.
System Energy’s receivables from the money pool were as follows:
June 30, 2015
December 31,
2014
June 30, 2014
December 31,
2013
(In Thousands)
$7,520
$2,373
$36,456
$9,223
See Note 4 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a description of the money pool.
The System Energy nuclear fuel company variable interest entity has a credit facility in the amount of
$125 million
scheduled to expire in
June 2016
. As of
June 30, 2015
, $37.5 million in letters of credit were outstanding under the credit facility to support a like amount of commercial paper issued by the System Energy nuclear fuel company variable interest entity. See Note 4 to the financial statements herein for additional discussion of the variable interest entity credit facility.
In April 2015 the System Energy nuclear fuel company variable interest entity redeemed, at maturity, its $60 million of 5.33% Series G Notes.
In May 2015, System Energy redeemed $35 million of its $216 million of 5.875% Series governmental bonds due 2022.
Nuclear Matters
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –
Nuclear Matters
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of nuclear matters.
Environmental Risks
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –
Environmental Risks
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of environmental risks.
Critical Accounting Estimates
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
Critical Accounting Estimates
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the estimates and judgments necessary in System Energy’s accounting for nuclear decommissioning costs and qualified pension and other postretirement benefits.
180
Table of Contents
SYSTEM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.
INCOME STATEMENTS
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended
Six Months Ended
2015
2014
2015
2014
(In Thousands)
(In Thousands)
OPERATING REVENUES
Electric
$163,101
$163,830
$319,140
$321,497
OPERATING EXPENSES
Operation and Maintenance:
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
22,943
23,111
43,416
37,259
Nuclear refueling outage expenses
5,420
5,511
11,102
11,693
Other operation and maintenance
41,083
34,122
76,789
68,800
Decommissioning
11,897
10,368
23,600
20,560
Taxes other than income taxes
6,558
6,352
13,766
12,874
Depreciation and amortization
37,247
35,985
74,307
73,311
Other regulatory credits - net
(7,517
)
(8,166
)
(17,094
)
(11,576
)
TOTAL
117,631
107,283
225,886
212,921
OPERATING INCOME
45,470
56,547
93,254
108,576
OTHER INCOME
Allowance for equity funds used during construction
2,042
986
3,693
2,204
Interest and investment income
3,250
1,388
7,463
5,803
Miscellaneous - net
(217
)
(96
)
(438
)
(201
)
TOTAL
5,075
2,278
10,718
7,806
INTEREST EXPENSE
Interest expense
12,347
13,354
25,360
27,601
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction
(540
)
(415
)
(976
)
(582
)
TOTAL
11,807
12,939
24,384
27,019
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES
38,738
45,886
79,588
89,363
Income taxes
16,878
19,955
32,195
38,813
NET INCOME
$21,860
$25,931
$47,393
$50,550
See Notes to Financial Statements.
181
Table of Contents
(page left blank intentionally)
182
Table of Contents
SYSTEM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014
(Unaudited)
2015
2014
(In Thousands)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income
$47,393
$50,550
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flow provided by operating activities:
Depreciation, amortization, and decommissioning, including nuclear fuel amortization
136,091
122,932
Deferred income taxes, investment tax credits, and non-current taxes accrued
6,699
43,603
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Receivables
2,286
43,554
Accounts payable
(746
)
(8,232
)
Prepaid taxes and taxes accrued
(9,355
)
(18,406
)
Interest accrued
(17,070
)
5,890
Other working capital accounts
3,148
(31,953
)
Other regulatory assets
(7
)
4,692
Pension and other postretirement liabilities
(6,620
)
(5,930
)
Other assets and liabilities
(12,753
)
(33,343
)
Net cash flow provided by operating activities
149,066
173,357
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Construction expenditures
(27,608
)
(37,453
)
Allowance for equity funds used during construction
3,693
2,204
Nuclear fuel purchases
(26,831
)
(152,527
)
Proceeds from the sale of nuclear fuel
21,263
43,992
Proceeds from nuclear decommissioning trust fund sales
161,977
231,632
Investment in nuclear decommissioning trust funds
(177,214
)
(246,990
)
Changes in money pool receivable - net
(5,147
)
(27,233
)
Net cash flow used in investing activities
(49,867
)
(186,375
)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Retirement of long-term debt
(106,405
)
(46,743
)
Changes in credit borrowings - net
17,102
65,400
Dividends paid:
Common stock
(122,000
)
(45,000
)
Other
(28
)
(27
)
Net cash flow used in financing activities
(211,331
)
(26,370
)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
(112,132
)
(39,388
)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
223,179
127,142
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$111,047
$87,754
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest - net of amount capitalized
$37,929
$16,364
Income taxes
$25,304
$5,564
See Notes to Financial Statements.
183
Table of Contents
SYSTEM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.
BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014
(Unaudited)
2015
2014
(In Thousands)
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents:
Cash
$901
$789
Temporary cash investments
110,146
222,390
Total cash and cash equivalents
111,047
223,179
Accounts receivable:
Associated companies
63,669
60,907
Other
5,816
5,717
Total accounts receivable
69,485
66,624
Materials and supplies - at average cost
83,740
80,049
Deferred nuclear refueling outage costs
15,184
26,580
Prepayments and other
6,868
2,312
TOTAL
286,324
398,744
OTHER PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS
Decommissioning trust funds
697,298
679,840
TOTAL
697,298
679,840
UTILITY PLANT
Electric
4,248,414
4,244,902
Property under capital lease
573,784
573,784
Construction work in progress
72,765
50,382
Nuclear fuel
216,032
251,376
TOTAL UTILITY PLANT
5,110,995
5,120,444
Less - accumulated depreciation and amortization
2,890,358
2,819,688
UTILITY PLANT - NET
2,220,637
2,300,756
DEFERRED DEBITS AND OTHER ASSETS
Regulatory assets:
Regulatory asset for income taxes - net
102,641
105,882
Other regulatory assets
338,861
335,613
Other
7,861
9,251
TOTAL
449,363
450,746
TOTAL ASSETS
$3,653,622
$3,830,086
See Notes to Financial Statements.
184
Table of Contents
SYSTEM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.
BALANCE SHEETS
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014
(Unaudited)
2015
2014
(In Thousands)
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Currently maturing long-term debt
$4,906
$76,310
Short-term borrowings
37,506
20,404
Accounts payable:
Associated companies
6,530
6,252
Other
35,419
33,096
Taxes accrued
13,912
23,267
Accumulated deferred income taxes
9,750
14,175
Interest accrued
16,125
33,196
Other
2,366
2,365
TOTAL
126,514
209,065
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accumulated deferred income taxes and taxes accrued
814,594
808,171
Accumulated deferred investment tax credits
50,493
49,313
Other regulatory liabilities
362,440
371,110
Decommissioning
781,518
757,918
Pension and other postretirement liabilities
122,532
129,152
Long-term debt
599,627
634,496
Other
—
350
TOTAL
2,731,204
2,750,510
Commitments and Contingencies
COMMON EQUITY
Common stock, no par value, authorized 1,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 789,350 shares in 2015 and 2014
789,350
789,350
Retained earnings
6,554
81,161
TOTAL
795,904
870,511
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
$3,653,622
$3,830,086
See Notes to Financial Statements.
185
Table of Contents
SYSTEM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN COMMON EQUITY
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014
(Unaudited)
Common Equity
Common
Stock
Retained
Earnings
Total
(In Thousands)
Balance at December 31, 2013
$789,350
$86,757
$876,107
Net income
—
50,550
50,550
Common stock dividends
—
(45,000
)
(45,000
)
Balance at June 30, 2014
$789,350
$92,307
$881,657
Balance at December 31, 2014
$789,350
$81,161
$870,511
Net income
—
47,393
47,393
Common stock dividends
—
(122,000
)
(122,000
)
Balance at June 30, 2015
$789,350
$6,554
$795,904
See Notes to Financial Statements.
186
Table of Contents
ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
See “
PART I, Item 1,
Litigation
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of legal, administrative, and other regulatory proceedings affecting Entergy. Following are updates to that discussion. Also see “
Item 5, Other Information,
Environmental Regulation
” below, for updates regarding environmental proceedings and regulation.
Texas Power Price Lawsuit
See Note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of this proceeding.
Mississippi Attorney General Complaint
See Note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of this proceeding.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes to the risk factors discussed in “
PART I, Item 1A,
Risk Factors”
in the Form 10-K.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities (a)
Period
Total Number of
Shares Purchased
Average Price Paid
per Share
Total Number of
Shares Purchased
as Part of a
Publicly
Announced Plan
Maximum $
Amount
of Shares that May
Yet be Purchased
Under a Plan (b)
4/01/2015-4/30/2015
—
$—
—
$350,052,918
5/01/2015-5/31/2015
—
$—
—
$350,052,918
6/01/2015-6/30/2015
—
$—
—
$350,052,918
Total
—
$—
—
In accordance with Entergy’s stock-based compensation plans, Entergy periodically grants stock options to key employees, which may be exercised to obtain shares of Entergy’s common stock. According to the plans, these shares can be newly issued shares, treasury stock, or shares purchased on the open market. Entergy’s management has been authorized by the Board to repurchase on the open market shares up to an amount sufficient to fund the exercise of grants under the plans. In addition to this authority, the Board has authorized share repurchase programs to enable opportunistic purchases in response to market conditions. In October 2010 the Board granted authority for a $500 million share repurchase program. The amount of share repurchases under these programs may vary as a result of material changes in business results or capital spending or new investment opportunities. In addition, in the first quarter 2015, Entergy withheld 35,473 shares of its common stock at $88.83 per share, 40,050 shares of its common stock at $88.15 per share, 42,706 shares of its common stock at $87.51 per share, and 36,721 shares of its common stock at $88.67 per share to pay income taxes due upon vesting of restricted stock granted and performance unit payout as part of its long-term incentive program.
(a)
See Note 12 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for additional discussion of the stock-based compensation plans.
187
Table of Contents
(b)
Maximum amount of shares that may yet be repurchased relates only to the $500 million plan and does not include an estimate of the amount of shares that may be purchased to fund the exercise of grants under the stock-based compensation plans.
Item 5. Other Information
Regulation of the Nuclear Power Industry
Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982
Spent Nuclear Fuel
See the discussion in Part I, Item 1 in the Form 10-K for information regarding litigation against the DOE related to the DOE’s breach of its obligation to remove spent fuel from nuclear sites. Following is an update to that discussion. In April 2015 the U.S. Court of Federal Claims issued a judgment in favor of Entergy Arkansas and against the DOE in the second round ANO damages case in the amount of $29.4 million. Also in April 2015 the U.S. Court of Federal Claims issued a judgment in favor of System Energy and against the DOE in the second round Grand Gulf damages case in the amount of $44.4 million. In June 2015, Entergy Arkansas and System Energy appealed portions of those decisions to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Management cannot predict the timing or amount of receipt of funds pursuant to these judgments.
Nuclear Plant Decommissioning
See the discussion in Part I, Item 1 in the Form 10-K for information regarding decommissioning funding for the nuclear plants. Following is an update to that discussion. In March 2015, filings with the NRC were made for all Entergy subsidiaries’ nuclear plants reporting on decommissioning funding. Those reports all showed that decommissioning funding for those nuclear plants met the NRC’s financial assurance requirements.
Environmental Regulation
Following are updates to the
Environmental Regulation
section of Part I, Item 1 of the Form 10-K.
Clean Air Act and Subsequent Amendments
Potential SO
2
Nonattainment
The EPA issued a final rule in June 2010 adopting an SO
2
1-hour national ambient air quality standard of 75 parts per billion. The EPA designations for counties in attainment and nonattainment were originally due in June 2012, but the EPA initially has indicated that it will delay designations except for those areas with existing monitoring data from 2009 to 2011 indicating violations of the new standard. In July 2013 EPA issued final designations for these areas. In Entergy’s utility service territory, only St. Bernard Parish in Louisiana is designated as non-attainment for the SO
2
1-hour national ambient air quality standard of 75 parts per billion. Entergy does not have a generation asset in that parish. Pursuant to a court order issued in Sierra Club v. McCarthy, No. 13-3953 (N.D. Cal.), the EPA will finalize another round of designations by July 2, 2016, for areas with newly monitored violations of the 2010 standard and those with stationary sources that emit over a threshold amount of SO
2
. Counties and parishes in which Entergy owns and operates fossil generating facilities that are expected to be assessed in this round of designations include Independence County and Jefferson County, Arkansas and Calcasieu Parish, Louisiana. In other areas, analysis is required once the EPA issues additional final regulations and guidance. Additional capital projects or operational changes may be required for Entergy facilities in areas eventually designated as in non-attainment of the standard or as contributing to non-attainment areas.
188
Table of Contents
Hazardous Air Pollution
The EPA released the final Mercury and Air Toxics Standard (MATS) rule in December 2011 and the rule became effective in April 2012. In June 2015 the Supreme Court reversed a D.C. Circuit Court decision and remanded to the D.C. Circuit the EPA’s finding that it was appropriate and necessary to regulate power plants under Clean Air Act section 112, ruling that the EPA must consider costs. This finding underpins the MATS rule. The D.C. Circuit is expected to remand the necessary and appropriate finding to the EPA for reconsideration and either vacate or stay the MATS rule in the interim. Entergy was on schedule to have the required controls in place for compliance at Entergy’s coal-fired units. Compliance with MATS was required by the Clean Air Act within three years, or by 2015, although certain extensions of this deadline were available from state permit authorities and the EPA. Entergy applied for and received a one-year extension, as allowed by the Clean Air Act, for its affected facilities in Arkansas and Louisiana. The controls have been installed but are in the commissioning stage prior to full scale operation.
Entergy is evaluating how it will operate and maintain the equipment in a reasonable and prudent manner during the interim. Entergy’s operations will continue to comply with any existing air permit limits and applicable regulations until those limits are modified or otherwise stayed.
Cross-State Air Pollution
As discussed in the Form 10-K, Entergy filed a petition for review with the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit and a petition with the EPA for reconsideration of the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR) and stay of its effectiveness. Several other parties filed similar petitions. In December 2011 the Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit Court stayed CSAPR and instructed the EPA to continue administering the Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR), pending further judicial review. In August 2012 the court issued a decision vacating CSAPR and leaving CAIR in place pending the promulgation of a lawful replacement for both rules. In March 2013 the EPA and other parties filed petitions for certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court, which were granted. In April 2014 the Supreme Court reversed the D.C. Circuit and remanded the case to the D.C. Circuit for further proceedings. In June 2014 the EPA filed a motion with the D.C. Circuit Court requesting that the court lift the stay and extend CSAPR’s deadlines by three years so that the Phase 1 emissions budgets apply in 2015 and 2016 and the Phase 2 emissions budgets apply in 2017 and beyond. In October 2014 the D.C. Circuit granted EPA's motion to lift the stay. Accordingly, CSAPR Phase 1 implementation became effective January 1, 2015. Entergy has developed a compliance plan that could, over time, include both installation of controls at certain facilities and an emission allowance procurement strategy. Litigation concerning several issues not determined by the Supreme Court continued in the D.C. Circuit until July 2015, when that court invalidated the allowance budgets created by the EPA for several states, including Texas, and remanded that portion of the rule to the EPA for further action. The court did not stay or vacate the rule in the interim; CSAPR remains in effect. The EPA’s response to this decision is unknown at this time. The EPA may revise only certain state allowance budgets or may revise the CSAPR program on a larger scale. Entergy will continue to comply with CSAPR until further advised by the EPA and its state environmental regulators.
Regional Haze
In June 2005 the EPA issued its final Clean Air Visibility Rule (CAVR) regulations that could potentially result in a requirement to install SO
2
and NO
x
pollution control technology as Best Available Retrofit Control Technology (BART) on certain of Entergy’s fossil generation units. The rule leaves certain CAVR determinations to the states. The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) prepared a State Implementation Plan (SIP) for Arkansas facilities to implement its obligations under the CAVR. In October 2011 the EPA released a proposed rule addressing the Arkansas Regional Haze SIP. In the proposal the EPA disapproved a large portion of the Arkansas Regional Haze SIP, including the emission limits for NO
x
and SO
2
at White Bluff. The final rule was published, mostly unchanged, in March 2012 and became final in April 2012. This triggered a two-year timeframe in which the EPA was required to either approve a revised SIP issued by Arkansas or issue a Federal Implementation Plan (FIP). This two-year time frame expired in April 2014. Pursuant to a consent decree between the Sierra Club and the EPA, the agency is to issue a final FIP for Arkansas Regional Haze by no later than December 15, 2015, but the EPA has stated that it does not anticipate it can meet the current deadline. In April 2015 the EPA published a proposed FIP for Arkansas,
189
Table of Contents
taking comment on requiring installation of scrubbers and low NO
x
burners on both units at the White Bluff plant and both units at the Independence plant and NO
x
controls at the Lake Catherine plant. Entergy is reviewing the proposed FIP and expects to comment by the deadline. These decisions could impact the timing and level of control installation at Entergy's coal units in Arkansas.
Entergy is working with the LDEQ and the EPA to revise the Louisiana SIP for regional haze, which was disapproved in part in 2012. At this time, it is premature to predict what controls, if any, might be required for compliance.
New and Existing Source Performance Standards for Greenhouse Gas Emissions
As a part of a climate plan announced in June 2013, President Obama directed the EPA to (i) reissue proposed carbon pollution standards for new power plants by September 20, 2013, with finalization of the rules to occur in a timely manner; (ii) issue proposed carbon pollution standards, regulations, or guidelines, as appropriate, for modified, reconstructed, and existing power plants no later than June 1, 2014; (iii) finalize those rules by no later than June 1, 2015; and (iv) include in the guidelines addressing existing power plants a requirement that states submit to the EPA the implementation plans required under Section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act and its implementing regulations by no later than June 30, 2016. In September 2013 the EPA issued the proposed New Source Performance Standards rule for new sources. The rule was published in the Federal Register in January 2014. In June 2014 the EPA issued proposed standards for existing power plants. Entergy has been actively engaged in the rulemaking process, having submitted comments to the EPA in December 2014. The EPA issued the final rule in August 2015. According to the EPA, the rule will require states to develop compliance plans with the EPA’s emission standards. The initial plans are due in September 2016, and final plans are due in September 2018. Litigation has commenced regarding the rule and is expected to continue. Entergy continues to review the rule. Costs of implementation cannot be determined at this time and will depend largely on the forthcoming state 111(d) implementation plans.
Clean Water Act
Federal Jurisdiction of Waters of the United States
In September 2013 the EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers announced the intention to propose a rule to clarify federal Clean Water Act jurisdiction over waters of the United States. The announcement was made in conjunction with the EPA’s release of a draft scientific report on the “connectivity” of waters that the agency says will inform the rulemaking - this report was finalized in January 2015. The Final Rule was published in the Federal Register in June 2015. The rule could significantly increase the number and types of waters included in the EPA’s and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ jurisdiction, which in turn could pose additional permitting and pollutant management burdens on Entergy’s operations. Entergy is actively engaged with the EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to identify issues that require clarification in expected technical and policy guidance documents. The final rule has been challenged in federal court by several parties, including over twenty-five states.
Coal Combustion Residuals
In June 2010 the EPA issued a proposed rule on coal combustion residuals (CCRs) that contained two primary regulatory options: (1) regulating CCRs destined for disposal in landfills or received (including stored) in surface impoundments as so-called “special wastes” under the hazardous waste program of RCRA Subtitle C; or (2) regulating CCRs destined for disposal in landfills or surface impoundments as non-hazardous wastes under Subtitle D of RCRA. Under both options, CCRs that are beneficially reused in certain processes would remain excluded from hazardous waste regulation. In April 2015 the EPA published the final CCR rule with the material being regulated under the second scenario presented above - as non-hazardous wastes regulated under RCRA Subtitle D.
The final regulations create new compliance requirements including modified storage, new notification and reporting practices, product disposal considerations, and CCR unit closure criteria. Entergy believes that on-site disposal options will be available at its facilities, to the extent needed for CCR that cannot be transferred for beneficial
190
Table of Contents
reuse. Entergy recorded asset retirement obligations in the second quarter 2015 related to CCR management of $6.4 million, including $3.6 million at Entergy Arkansas, $0.9 million at Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, $1 million at Entergy Mississippi, and $0.6 million at Entergy Texas.
Other Environmental Matters
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Texas
As discussed in the Form 10-K, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana is currently involved in the second phase of the remedial investigation of the Lake Charles Service Center site, located in Lake Charles, Louisiana. The EPA plans to release the final Five Year Review for Entergy review in 2015. The EPA believes that the current remediation technique is insufficient, and Entergy will need to utilize other remediation technologies on the site. In July 2015, Entergy submitted a Focused Feasibility Study to the EPA outlining the potential remedies and the suggested installation of a waterloo barrier. The estimated cost for this remedy is approximately $2 million. Entergy expects direction from the EPA on the remedy selection by the end of 2015. Entergy is continuing discussions with the EPA regarding the ongoing actions at the site.
Entergy Arkansas
In April 2014 an EF4 tornado impacted two substation transformers in Entergy Arkansas’s Mayflower EHV substation. The tornado caused a release of approximately 25,000 gallons of non-PCB transformer oils, which subsequently flowed into a creek on Entergy Arkansas property. A report was made to the National Response Center, and several environmental agencies responded. Entergy initiated spill response activities within hours of the release with eventual oversight of the EPA and Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality personnel. At the direction of the agencies, Entergy Arkansas has installed several temporary monitoring and recovery wells throughout the site and has regularly pumped and sampled the wells to determine the site meets regulatory screening limits. Recovery and sampling operations will continue at the site until these limits are achieved; it is anticipated that this process could take up to two years to complete. Entergy Arkansas believes that its remaining liability at the site will not materially exceed the existing clean-up provision of $0.4 million.
Entergy
In May 2015 a transformer at the Indian Point facility failed, resulting in a fire and the release of non-PCB oil to the ground surface. The fire was extinguished by the facility’s fire deluge system. No injuries occurred due to the transformer failure or company response. An estimated 3,000 gallons of oil were released into the facility’s discharge canal and the environment surrounding the transformer and discharge canal, including the Hudson River, as a result of the failure, fire, and fire suppression. Once the fire was extinguished, Indian Point personnel and contractors began recovering free-product from the damaged transformer, the transformer containment moat, and the area surrounding the transformer. The United States Coast Guard designated Entergy as the responsible party under the Oil Pollution Act of 1990. As required, Entergy established a claims process including a voluntary hotline. Entergy received no reports to the voluntary hotline or claims under the established claims process. Additional on-site remedial work continues, and the State of New York and/or the EPA may assess a penalty due to the release of oil to waters of the state. Discussions with the state continue and Entergy has recorded a provision for the potential outcome of this matter.
191
Table of Contents
Earnings Ratios
(Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy)
The Registrant Subsidiaries have calculated ratios of earnings to fixed charges and ratios of earnings to combined fixed charges and preferred dividends/distributions pursuant to Item 503 of Regulation S-K of the SEC as follows:
Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges
Twelve Months Ended
December 31,
June 30,
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Entergy Arkansas
3.91
4.31
3.79
3.62
3.08
2.57
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana
3.58
4.36
3.48
3.63
3.84
3.71
Entergy Louisiana
3.41
1.86
2.08
3.13
3.23
3.34
Entergy Mississippi
3.35
3.55
2.79
3.19
3.23
3.19
Entergy New Orleans
4.43
5.37
3.02
1.93
3.96
4.73
Entergy Texas
2.10
2.34
1.76
1.94
2.39
2.40
System Energy
3.64
3.85
5.12
5.66
4.04
3.98
Ratios of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges
and Preferred Dividends/Distributions
Twelve Months Ended
December 31,
June 30,
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Entergy Arkansas
3.60
3.83
3.36
3.25
2.76
2.32
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana
3.54
4.30
3.43
3.57
3.78
3.65
Entergy Louisiana
3.19
1.70
1.93
2.92
3.03
3.14
Entergy Mississippi
3.16
3.27
2.59
2.97
3.00
2.96
Entergy New Orleans
4.08
4.74
2.67
1.74
3.56
4.25
The Registrant Subsidiaries accrue interest expense related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense and do not include it in fixed charges.
Item 6. Exhibits *
4(a) -
Officer’s Certificate No. 8-B-6 dated May 18, 2015, supplemental to Indenture, Deed of Trust and Security Agreement dated as of October 1, 2008, between Entergy Texas, Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee (4.40 to Form 8-K dated May 21, 2015 in 1-34360).
4(b) -
Officer’s Certificate for Entergy Corporation relating to 4.0% Senior Notes due July 15, 2022 (4.02 to Form 8-K dated July 1, 2015 in 1-11299).
+10(a) -
Executive Annual Incentive Plan of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries (As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2016) (Appendix B to 2015 Proxy Statement, dated March 20, 2015 in File No. 001-11299).
+10(b) -
2015 Equity Ownership Plan of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries (Appendix C to 2015 Proxy Statement, dated March 20, 2015 in File No. 001-11299).
*+10(c) -
The 2015 Entergy Corporation Non-Employee Director Stock Program established under the 2015 Equity Ownership Plan of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries.
*+10(d) -
Entergy Corporation Service Recognition Program for Non-Employee Directors (As Amended and Restated Effective June 1, 2015)
192
Table of Contents
*12(a) -
Entergy Arkansas’s Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Dividends, as defined.
*12(b) -
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana’s Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Distributions, as defined.
*12(c) -
Entergy Louisiana’s Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Distributions, as defined.
*12(d) -
Entergy Mississippi’s Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Dividends, as defined.
*12(e) -
Entergy New Orleans’s Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Dividends, as defined.
*12(f) -
Entergy Texas’s Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges, as defined.
*12(g) -
System Energy’s Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges, as defined.
*31(a) -
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy Corporation.
*31(b) -
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy Corporation.
*31(c) -
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy Arkansas.
*31(d) -
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy Arkansas.
*31(e) -
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy Gulf States Louisiana.
*31(f) -
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy Gulf States Louisiana.
*31(g) -
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy Louisiana.
*31(h) -
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy Louisiana.
*31(i) -
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy Mississippi.
*31(j) -
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy Mississippi.
*31(k) -
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy New Orleans.
*31(l) -
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy New Orleans.
*31(m) -
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy Texas.
*31(n) -
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy Texas.
*31(o) -
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for System Energy.
*31(p) -
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for System Energy.
*32(a) -
Section 1350 Certification for Entergy Corporation.
*32(b) -
Section 1350 Certification for Entergy Corporation.
*32(c) -
Section 1350 Certification for Entergy Arkansas.
*32(d) -
Section 1350 Certification for Entergy Arkansas.
*32(e) -
Section 1350 Certification for Entergy Gulf States Louisiana.
*32(f) -
Section 1350 Certification for Entergy Gulf States Louisiana.
*32(g) -
Section 1350 Certification for Entergy Louisiana.
*32(h) -
Section 1350 Certification for Entergy Louisiana.
*32(i) -
Section 1350 Certification for Entergy Mississippi.
193
Table of Contents
*32(j) -
Section 1350 Certification for Entergy Mississippi.
*32(k) -
Section 1350 Certification for Entergy New Orleans.
*32(l) -
Section 1350 Certification for Entergy New Orleans.
*32(m) -
Section 1350 Certification for Entergy Texas.
*32(n) -
Section 1350 Certification for Entergy Texas.
*32(o) -
Section 1350 Certification for System Energy.
*32(p) -
Section 1350 Certification for System Energy.
*101 INS -
XBRL Instance Document.
*101 SCH -
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
*101 PRE -
XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document.
*101 LAB -
XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document.
*101 CAL -
XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document.
*101 DEF -
XBRL Definition Linkbase Document.
___________________________
Pursuant to Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of Regulation S-K, Entergy Corporation agrees to furnish to the Commission upon request any instrument with respect to long-term debt that is not registered or listed herein as an Exhibit because the total amount of securities authorized under such agreement does not exceed ten percent of the total assets of Entergy Corporation and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.
*
Filed herewith.
+
Management contracts or compensatory plans or arrangements.
194
Table of Contents
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, each registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized. The signature for each undersigned company shall be deemed to relate only to matters having reference to such company or its subsidiaries.
ENTERGY CORPORATION
ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC.
ENTERGY GULF STATES LOUISIANA, L.L.C.
ENTERGY LOUISIANA, LLC
ENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, INC.
ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, INC.
ENTERGY TEXAS, INC.
SYSTEM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.
/s/ Alyson M. Mount
Alyson M. Mount
Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
(For each Registrant and for each as
Principal Accounting Officer)
Date:
August 6, 2015
195