Companies:
10,652
total market cap:
$139.478 T
Sign In
๐บ๐ธ
EN
English
$ USD
โฌ
EUR
๐ช๐บ
โน
INR
๐ฎ๐ณ
ยฃ
GBP
๐ฌ๐ง
$
CAD
๐จ๐ฆ
$
AUD
๐ฆ๐บ
$
NZD
๐ณ๐ฟ
$
HKD
๐ญ๐ฐ
$
SGD
๐ธ๐ฌ
Global ranking
Ranking by countries
America
๐บ๐ธ United States
๐จ๐ฆ Canada
๐ฒ๐ฝ Mexico
๐ง๐ท Brazil
๐จ๐ฑ Chile
Europe
๐ช๐บ European Union
๐ฉ๐ช Germany
๐ฌ๐ง United Kingdom
๐ซ๐ท France
๐ช๐ธ Spain
๐ณ๐ฑ Netherlands
๐ธ๐ช Sweden
๐ฎ๐น Italy
๐จ๐ญ Switzerland
๐ต๐ฑ Poland
๐ซ๐ฎ Finland
Asia
๐จ๐ณ China
๐ฏ๐ต Japan
๐ฐ๐ท South Korea
๐ญ๐ฐ Hong Kong
๐ธ๐ฌ Singapore
๐ฎ๐ฉ Indonesia
๐ฎ๐ณ India
๐ฒ๐พ Malaysia
๐น๐ผ Taiwan
๐น๐ญ Thailand
๐ป๐ณ Vietnam
Others
๐ฆ๐บ Australia
๐ณ๐ฟ New Zealand
๐ฎ๐ฑ Israel
๐ธ๐ฆ Saudi Arabia
๐น๐ท Turkey
๐ท๐บ Russia
๐ฟ๐ฆ South Africa
>> All Countries
Ranking by categories
๐ All assets by Market Cap
๐ Automakers
โ๏ธ Airlines
๐ซ Airports
โ๏ธ Aircraft manufacturers
๐ฆ Banks
๐จ Hotels
๐ Pharmaceuticals
๐ E-Commerce
โ๏ธ Healthcare
๐ฆ Courier services
๐ฐ Media/Press
๐ท Alcoholic beverages
๐ฅค Beverages
๐ Clothing
โ๏ธ Mining
๐ Railways
๐ฆ Insurance
๐ Real estate
โ Ports
๐ผ Professional services
๐ด Food
๐ Restaurant chains
โ๐ป Software
๐ Semiconductors
๐ฌ Tobacco
๐ณ Financial services
๐ข Oil&Gas
๐ Electricity
๐งช Chemicals
๐ฐ Investment
๐ก Telecommunication
๐๏ธ Retail
๐ฅ๏ธ Internet
๐ Construction
๐ฎ Video Game
๐ป Tech
๐ฆพ AI
>> All Categories
ETFs
๐ All ETFs
๐๏ธ Bond ETFs
๏ผ Dividend ETFs
โฟ Bitcoin ETFs
โข Ethereum ETFs
๐ช Crypto Currency ETFs
๐ฅ Gold ETFs & ETCs
๐ฅ Silver ETFs & ETCs
๐ข๏ธ Oil ETFs & ETCs
๐ฝ Commodities ETFs & ETNs
๐ Emerging Markets ETFs
๐ Small-Cap ETFs
๐ Low volatility ETFs
๐ Inverse/Bear ETFs
โฌ๏ธ Leveraged ETFs
๐ Global/World ETFs
๐บ๐ธ USA ETFs
๐บ๐ธ S&P 500 ETFs
๐บ๐ธ Dow Jones ETFs
๐ช๐บ Europe ETFs
๐จ๐ณ China ETFs
๐ฏ๐ต Japan ETFs
๐ฎ๐ณ India ETFs
๐ฌ๐ง UK ETFs
๐ฉ๐ช Germany ETFs
๐ซ๐ท France ETFs
โ๏ธ Mining ETFs
โ๏ธ Gold Mining ETFs
โ๏ธ Silver Mining ETFs
๐งฌ Biotech ETFs
๐ฉโ๐ป Tech ETFs
๐ Real Estate ETFs
โ๏ธ Healthcare ETFs
โก Energy ETFs
๐ Renewable Energy ETFs
๐ก๏ธ Insurance ETFs
๐ฐ Water ETFs
๐ด Food & Beverage ETFs
๐ฑ Socially Responsible ETFs
๐ฃ๏ธ Infrastructure ETFs
๐ก Innovation ETFs
๐ Semiconductors ETFs
๐ Aerospace & Defense ETFs
๐ Cybersecurity ETFs
๐ฆพ Artificial Intelligence ETFs
Watchlist
Account
Entergy
ETR
#566
Rank
$42.82 B
Marketcap
๐บ๐ธ
United States
Country
$95.89
Share price
-0.15%
Change (1 day)
19.38%
Change (1 year)
๐ Electricity
๐ฐ Utility companies
โก Energy
Categories
Market cap
Revenue
Earnings
Price history
P/E ratio
P/S ratio
More
Price history
P/E ratio
P/S ratio
P/B ratio
Operating margin
EPS
Dividends
Dividend yield
Shares outstanding
Fails to deliver
Cost to borrow
Total assets
Total liabilities
Total debt
Cash on Hand
Net Assets
Annual Reports (10-K)
Entergy
Quarterly Reports (10-Q)
Financial Year FY2017 Q2
Entergy - 10-Q quarterly report FY2017 Q2
Text size:
Small
Medium
Large
Table of Contents
__________________________________________________________________________________________
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
X
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2017
OR
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13
OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ____________ to ____________
Commission
File Number
Registrant, State of Incorporation or Organization, Address of Principal Executive Offices, Telephone Number, and IRS Employer Identification No.
Commission
File Number
Registrant, State of Incorporation or Organization, Address of Principal Executive Offices, Telephone Number, and IRS Employer Identification No.
1-11299
ENTERGY CORPORATION
(a Delaware corporation)
639 Loyola Avenue
New Orleans, Louisiana 70113
Telephone (504) 576-4000
72-1229752
1-35747
ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, INC.
(a Louisiana corporation)
1600 Perdido Street
New Orleans, Louisiana 70112
Telephone (504) 670-3700
72-0273040
1-10764
ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC.
(an Arkansas corporation)
425 West Capitol Avenue
Little Rock, Arkansas 72201
Telephone (501) 377-4000
71-0005900
1-34360
ENTERGY TEXAS, INC.
(a Texas corporation)
10055 Grogans Mill Road
The Woodlands, Texas 77380
Telephone (409) 981-2000
61-1435798
1-32718
ENTERGY LOUISIANA, LLC
(a Texas limited liability company)
4809 Jefferson Highway
Jefferson, Louisiana 70121
Telephone (504) 576-4000
47-4469646
1-09067
SYSTEM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.
(an Arkansas corporation)
1340 Echelon Parkway
Jackson, Mississippi 39213
Telephone (601) 368-5000
72-0752777
1-31508
ENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, INC.
(a Mississippi corporation)
308 East Pearl Street
Jackson, Mississippi 39201
Telephone (601) 368-5000
64-0205830
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Indicate by check mark whether the registrants (1) have filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrants were required to file such reports), and (2) have been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
þ
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrants have submitted electronically and posted on Entergy’s corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrants were required to submit and post such files). Yes
þ
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether each registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Large
accelerated
filer
Accelerated
filer
Non-
accelerated
filer
Smaller
reporting
company
Emerging
growth
company
Entergy Corporation
ü
Entergy Arkansas, Inc.
ü
Entergy Louisiana, LLC
ü
Entergy Mississippi, Inc.
ü
Entergy New Orleans, Inc.
ü
Entergy Texas, Inc.
ü
System Energy Resources, Inc.
ü
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrants have elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrants are shell companies (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes
o
No
þ
Common Stock Outstanding
Outstanding at July 31, 2017
Entergy Corporation
($0.01 par value)
179,520,021
Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Inc., Entergy Louisiana, LLC, Entergy Mississippi, Inc., Entergy New Orleans, Inc., Entergy Texas, Inc., and System Energy Resources, Inc. separately file this combined Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Information contained herein relating to any individual company is filed by such company on its own behalf. Each company reports herein only as to itself and makes no other representations whatsoever as to any other company. This combined Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q supplements and updates the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the calendar year ended December 31, 2016 and the Quarterly Report for Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2017, filed by the individual registrants with the SEC, and should be read in conjunction therewith.
Table of Contents
ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX TO QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
June 30, 2017
Page Number
Forward-looking information
iii
Definitions
v
Part 1. Financial Information
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis
1
Consolidated Income Statements
21
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
23
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
24
Consolidated Balance Sheets
26
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity
28
Selected Operating Results
29
Notes to Financial Statements
30
Note 1. Commitments and Contingencies
30
Note 2. Rate and Regulatory Matters
31
Note 3. Equity
39
Note 4. Revolving Credit Facilities, Lines of Credit, Short-term Borrowings, and Long-term Debt
44
Note 5. Stock-based Compensation
49
Note 6. Retirement and Other Postretirement Benefits
51
Note 7. Business Segment Information
57
Note 8. Risk Management and Fair Values
59
Note 9. Decommissioning Trust Funds
78
Note 10. Income Taxes
86
Note 11. Property, Plant, and Equipment
87
Note 12. Variable Interest Entities
87
Note 13. Dispositions
87
Note 14. Asset Retirement Obligations
88
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
89
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
89
Entergy Arkansas, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis
90
Consolidated Income Statements
99
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
101
Consolidated Balance Sheets
102
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Common Equity
104
Selected Operating Results
105
Entergy Louisiana, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis
106
Consolidated Income Statements
117
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
118
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
119
i
Table of Contents
ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX TO QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
June 30, 2017
Page Number
Consolidated Balance Sheets
120
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity
122
Selected Operating Results
123
Entergy Mississippi, Inc.
Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis
124
Income Statements
130
Statements of Cash Flows
131
Balance Sheets
132
Statements of Changes in Common Equity
134
Selected Operating Results
135
Entergy New Orleans, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis
136
Consolidated Income Statements
142
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
143
Consolidated Balance Sheets
144
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Common Equity
146
Selected Operating Results
147
Entergy Texas, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis
148
Consolidated Income Statements
155
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
157
Consolidated Balance Sheets
158
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Common Equity
160
Selected Operating Results
161
System Energy Resources, Inc.
Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis
162
Income Statements
166
Statements of Cash Flows
167
Balance Sheets
168
Statements of Changes in Common Equity
170
Part II. Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
171
Item 1A. Risk Factors
171
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
171
Item 5. Other Information
172
Item 6. Exhibits
176
Signature
178
ii
Table of Contents
FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
In this combined report and from time to time, Entergy Corporation and the Registrant Subsidiaries each makes statements as a registrant concerning its expectations, beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, strategies, and future events or performance. Such statements are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Words such as “may,” “will,” “could,” “project,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “expect,” “estimate,” “continue,” “potential,” “plan,” “predict,” “forecast,” and other similar words or expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements but are not the only means to identify these statements. Although each of these registrants believes that these forward-looking statements and the underlying assumptions are reasonable, it cannot provide assurance that they will prove correct. Any forward-looking statement is based on information current as of the date of this combined report and speaks only as of the date on which such statement is made. Except to the extent required by the federal securities laws, these registrants undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.
Forward-looking statements involve a number of risks and uncertainties. There are factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements, including those factors discussed or incorporated by reference in (a) Item 1A. Risk Factors in the Form 10-K, (b) Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis in the Form 10-K and in this report, and (c) the following factors (in addition to others described elsewhere in this combined report and in subsequent securities filings):
•
resolution of pending and future rate cases and negotiations, including various performance-based rate discussions, Entergy’s utility supply plan, and recovery of fuel and purchased power costs;
•
long-term risks and uncertainties associated with the termination of the System Agreement in 2016, including the potential absence of federal authority to resolve certain issues among the Utility operating companies and their retail regulators;
•
regulatory and operating challenges and uncertainties and economic risks associated with the Utility operating companies’ participation in MISO, including the effect of current or projected MISO market rules and market and system conditions in the MISO markets, the allocation of MISO system transmission upgrade costs, and the effect of planning decisions that MISO makes with respect to future transmission investments by the Utility operating companies;
•
changes in utility regulation, including the beginning or end of retail and wholesale competition, the ability to recover net utility assets and other potential stranded costs, and the application of more stringent transmission reliability requirements or market power criteria by the FERC or the U.S. Department of Justice;
•
changes in the regulation or regulatory oversight of Entergy’s nuclear generating facilities and nuclear materials and fuel, including with respect to the planned potential or actual shutdown of nuclear generating facilities owned or operated by Entergy Wholesale Commodities, and the effects of new or existing safety or environmental concerns regarding nuclear power plants and nuclear fuel;
•
resolution of pending or future applications, and related regulatory proceedings and litigation, for license renewals or modifications or other authorizations required of nuclear generating facilities and the effect of public and political opposition on these applications, regulatory proceedings, and litigation;
•
the performance of and deliverability of power from Entergy’s generation resources, including the capacity factors at its nuclear generating facilities;
•
the operation and maintenance of Entergy’s nuclear generating facilities require the commitment of substantial human and capital resources that can result in increased costs and capital expenditures;
•
Entergy’s ability to develop and execute on a point of view regarding future prices of electricity, natural gas, and other energy-related commodities;
•
prices for power generated by Entergy’s merchant generating facilities and the ability to hedge, meet credit support requirements for hedges, sell power forward or otherwise reduce the market price risk associated with those facilities, including the Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear plants;
•
the prices and availability of fuel and power Entergy must purchase for its Utility customers, and Entergy’s ability to meet credit support requirements for fuel and power supply contracts;
•
volatility and changes in markets for electricity, natural gas, uranium, emissions allowances, and other energy-related commodities, and the effect of those changes on Entergy and its customers;
iii
Table of Contents
FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION (Concluded)
•
changes in law resulting from federal or state energy legislation or legislation subjecting energy derivatives used in hedging and risk management transactions to governmental regulation;
•
changes in environmental laws and regulations or associated litigation, including requirements for reduced emissions of sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxide, greenhouse gases, mercury, particulate matter, heat, and other regulated air and water emissions, and changes in costs of compliance with environmental laws and regulations;
•
the effects of changes in federal, state or local laws and regulations, and other governmental actions or policies, including changes in monetary, fiscal, tax, environmental, or energy policies;
•
uncertainty regarding the establishment of interim or permanent sites for spent nuclear fuel and nuclear waste storage and disposal and the level of spent fuel and nuclear waste disposal fees charged by the U.S. government or other providers related to such sites;
•
variations in weather and the occurrence of hurricanes and other storms and disasters, including uncertainties associated with efforts to remediate the effects of hurricanes, ice storms, or other weather events and the recovery of costs associated with restoration, including accessing funded storm reserves, federal and local cost recovery mechanisms, securitization, and insurance;
•
effects of climate change, including the potential for increases in sea levels or coastal land and wetland loss;
•
changes in the quality and availability of water supplies and the related regulation of water use and diversion;
•
Entergy’s ability to manage its capital projects and operation and maintenance costs;
•
Entergy’s ability to purchase and sell assets at attractive prices and on other attractive terms;
•
the economic climate, and particularly economic conditions in Entergy’s Utility service area and the Northeast United States and events and circumstances that could influence economic conditions in those areas, including power prices, and the risk that anticipated load growth may not materialize;
•
the effects of Entergy’s strategies to reduce tax payments;
•
changes in the financial markets and regulatory requirements for the issuance of securities, particularly as they affect access to capital and Entergy’s ability to refinance existing securities, execute share repurchase programs, and fund investments and acquisitions;
•
actions of rating agencies, including changes in the ratings of debt and preferred stock, changes in general corporate ratings, and changes in the rating agencies’ ratings criteria;
•
changes in inflation and interest rates;
•
the effect of litigation and government investigations or proceedings;
•
changes in technology, including with respect to new, developing, or alternative sources of generation;
•
the effects, including increased security costs, of threatened or actual terrorism, cyber-attacks or data security breaches, natural or man-made electromagnetic pulses that affect transmission or generation infrastructure, accidents, and war or a catastrophic event such as a nuclear accident or a natural gas pipeline explosion;
•
Entergy’s ability to attract and retain talented management and directors;
•
changes in accounting standards and corporate governance;
•
declines in the market prices of marketable securities and resulting funding requirements and the effects on benefits costs for Entergy’s defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans;
•
future wage and employee benefit costs, including changes in discount rates and returns on benefit plan assets;
•
changes in decommissioning trust fund values or earnings or in the timing of, requirements for, or cost to decommission Entergy’s nuclear plant sites and the implementation of decommissioning of such sites following shutdown;
•
the decision to cease merchant power generation at all Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear power plants by as early as 2021, including the implementation of the planned shutdown of Pilgrim, Palisades, Indian Point 2, and Indian Point 3;
•
the effectiveness of Entergy’s risk management policies and procedures and the ability and willingness of its counterparties to satisfy their financial and performance commitments;
•
factors that could lead to impairment of long-lived assets; and
•
the ability to successfully complete strategic transactions Entergy may undertake, including mergers, acquisitions, or divestitures, regulatory or other limitations imposed as a result of any such strategic transaction, and the success of the business following any such strategic transaction.
iv
Table of Contents
DEFINITIONS
Certain abbreviations or acronyms used in the text and notes are defined below:
Abbreviation or Acronym
Term
ALJ
Administrative Law Judge
ANO 1 and 2
Units 1 and 2 of Arkansas Nuclear One (nuclear), owned by Entergy Arkansas
APSC
Arkansas Public Service Commission
ASU
Accounting Standards Update issued by the FASB
Board
Board of Directors of Entergy Corporation
Cajun
Cajun Electric Power Cooperative, Inc.
capacity factor
Actual plant output divided by maximum potential plant output for the period
City Council
Council of the City of New Orleans, Louisiana
D.C. Circuit
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
DOE
United States Department of Energy
Entergy
Entergy Corporation and its direct and indirect subsidiaries
Entergy Corporation
Entergy Corporation, a Delaware corporation
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, L.L.C., a Louisiana limited liability company formally created as part of the jurisdictional separation of Entergy Gulf States, Inc. and the successor company to Entergy Gulf States, Inc. for financial reporting purposes. The term is also used to refer to the Louisiana jurisdictional business of Entergy Gulf States, Inc., as the context requires. Effective October 1, 2015, the business of Entergy Gulf States Louisiana was combined with Entergy Louisiana.
Entergy Louisiana
Entergy Louisiana, LLC, a Texas limited liability company formally created as part of the combination of Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and the company formerly known as Entergy Louisiana, LLC (Old Entergy Louisiana) into a single public utility company and the successor to Old Entergy Louisiana for financial reporting purposes.
Entergy Texas
Entergy Texas, Inc., a Texas corporation formally created as part of the jurisdictional separation of Entergy Gulf States, Inc. The term is also used to refer to the Texas jurisdictional business of Entergy Gulf States, Inc., as the context requires.
Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Entergy’s non-utility business segment primarily comprised of the ownership, operation, and decommissioning of nuclear power plants, the ownership of interests in non-nuclear power plants, and the sale of the electric power produced by its operating power plants to wholesale customers
EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
FASB
Financial Accounting Standards Board
FERC
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
FitzPatrick
James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant (nuclear), previously owned by an Entergy subsidiary in the Entergy Wholesale Commodities business segment, which was sold in March 2017
Form 10-K
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the calendar year ended December 31, 2016 filed with the SEC by Entergy Corporation and its Registrant Subsidiaries
Grand Gulf
Unit No. 1 of Grand Gulf Nuclear Station (nuclear), 90% owned or leased by System Energy
GWh
Gigawatt-hour(s), which equals one million kilowatt-hours
Independence
Independence Steam Electric Station (coal), owned 16% by Entergy Arkansas, 25% by Entergy Mississippi, and 7% by Entergy Power, LLC
Indian Point 2
Unit 2 of Indian Point Energy Center (nuclear), owned by an Entergy subsidiary in the Entergy Wholesale Commodities business segment
v
Table of Contents
DEFINITIONS (Continued)
Abbreviation or Acronym
Term
Indian Point 3
Unit 3 of Indian Point Energy Center (nuclear), owned by an Entergy subsidiary in the Entergy Wholesale Commodities business segment
IRS
Internal Revenue Service
ISO
Independent System Operator
kW
Kilowatt, which equals one thousand watts
kWh
Kilowatt-hour(s)
LPSC
Louisiana Public Service Commission
MISO
Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc., a regional transmission organization
MMBtu
One million British Thermal Units
MPSC
Mississippi Public Service Commission
MW
Megawatt(s), which equals one thousand kilowatts
MWh
Megawatt-hour(s)
Net debt to net capital ratio
Gross debt less cash and cash equivalents divided by total capitalization less cash and cash equivalents
Net MW in operation
Installed capacity owned and operated
NRC
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
NYPA
New York Power Authority
Palisades
Palisades Nuclear Plant (nuclear), owned by an Entergy subsidiary in the Entergy Wholesale Commodities business segment
Parent & Other
The portions of Entergy not included in the Utility or Entergy Wholesale Commodities segments, primarily consisting of the activities of the parent company, Entergy Corporation
Pilgrim
Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station (nuclear), owned by an Entergy subsidiary in the Entergy Wholesale Commodities business segment
PPA
Purchased power agreement or power purchase agreement
PUCT
Public Utility Commission of Texas
Registrant Subsidiaries
Entergy Arkansas, Inc., Entergy Louisiana, LLC, Entergy Mississippi, Inc., Entergy New Orleans, Inc., Entergy Texas, Inc., and System Energy Resources, Inc.
River Bend
River Bend Station (nuclear), owned by Entergy Louisiana
SEC
Securities and Exchange Commission
System Agreement
Agreement, effective January 1, 1983, as modified, among the Utility operating companies relating to the sharing of generating capacity and other power resources. The agreement terminated effective August 2016.
System Energy
System Energy Resources, Inc.
TWh
Terawatt-hour(s), which equals one billion kilowatt-hours
Unit Power Sales Agreement
Agreement, dated as of June 10, 1982, as amended and approved by FERC, among Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, and System Energy, relating to the sale of capacity and energy from System Energy’s share of Grand Gulf
Utility
Entergy’s business segment that generates, transmits, distributes, and sells electric power, with a small amount of natural gas distribution
Utility operating companies
Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, and Entergy Texas
vi
Table of Contents
DEFINITIONS (Concluded)
Abbreviation or Acronym
Term
Vermont Yankee
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station (nuclear), owned by an Entergy subsidiary in the Entergy Wholesale Commodities business segment, which ceased power production in December 2014
Waterford 3
Unit No. 3 (nuclear) of the Waterford Steam Electric Station, 100% owned or leased by Entergy Louisiana
weather-adjusted usage
Electric usage excluding the effects of deviations from normal weather
White Bluff
White Bluff Steam Electric Generating Station, 57% owned by Entergy Arkansas
vii
Table of Contents
ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Entergy operates primarily through two business segments: Utility and Entergy Wholesale Commodities.
•
The
Utility
business segment includes the generation, transmission, distribution, and sale of electric power in portions of Arkansas, Mississippi, Texas, and Louisiana, including the City of New Orleans; and operation of a small natural gas distribution business.
•
The
Entergy Wholesale Commodities
business segment includes the ownership, operation, and decommissioning of nuclear power plants located in the northern United States and the sale of the electric power produced by its operating plants to wholesale customers. Entergy Wholesale Commodities also provides services to other nuclear power plant owners and owns interests in non-nuclear power plants that sell the electric power produced by those plants to wholesale customers. See “
Entergy Wholesale Commodities Exit from the Merchant Power Business
” below and in the Form 10-K for discussion of the operation and planned shutdown or sale of each of the Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear power plants.
Results of Operations
Second Quarter
2017
Compared to
Second Quarter
2016
Following are income statement variances for Utility, Entergy Wholesale Commodities, Parent & Other, and Entergy comparing the
second quarter
2017
to the
second quarter
2016
showing how much the line item increased or (decreased) in comparison to the prior period:
Utility
Entergy
Wholesale
Commodities
Parent &
Other (a)
Entergy
(In Thousands)
2nd Quarter 2016 Consolidated Net Income (Loss)
$380,317
$250,874
($58,601
)
$572,590
Net revenue (operating revenue less fuel expense, purchased power, and other regulatory charges/credits)
25,287
(42,793
)
(13
)
(17,519
)
Other operation and maintenance
27,323
33,768
(52
)
61,039
Asset write-offs, impairments, and related charges
—
186,602
—
186,602
Taxes other than income taxes
10,604
(6,687
)
98
4,015
Depreciation and amortization
8,833
6,100
(273
)
14,660
Other income
16,843
26,306
594
43,743
Interest expense
(9,259
)
(379
)
1,993
(7,645
)
Other expenses
3,928
10,986
—
14,914
Income taxes
134,636
(219,889
)
(2,886
)
(88,139
)
2nd Quarter 2017 Consolidated Net Income (Loss)
$246,382
$223,886
($56,900
)
$413,368
(a)
Parent & Other includes eliminations, which are primarily intersegment activity.
Refer to “
ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES -
SELECTED OPERATING RESULTS
” for further information with respect to operating statistics.
Second quarter 2017 results of operations include a reduction of income tax expense, net of unrecognized tax benefits, of $373 million as a result of tax elections to treat as corporations for federal income tax purposes two subsidiaries that each own an Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear power plant and $194 million ($126 million net-of-tax) of impairment charges due to costs being charged to expense as incurred as a result of the impaired value
1
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
of the Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear plants’ long-lived assets due to the significantly reduced remaining estimated operating lives associated with management’s strategy to reduce the size of the Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ merchant fleet. See Note 10 to the financial statements herein for additional discussion of the tax elections and “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
-
Entergy Wholesale Commodities Exit from the Merchant Power Business
” below and in the Form 10-K for a discussion of management’s strategy to reduce the size of the Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ merchant fleet.
Second quarter 2016 results of operations include a reduction of income tax expense, net of unrecognized tax benefits, of $238 million as a result of a tax election to treat as a corporation for federal income tax purposes a subsidiary that owns an Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear power plant; income tax benefits as a result of the settlement of the 2010-2011 IRS audit, including a $75 million tax benefit recognized by Entergy Louisiana related to the treatment of the Vidalia purchased power agreement and a $54 million net benefit recognized by Entergy Louisiana related to the treatment of proceeds received in 2010 for the financing of Hurricane Gustav and Hurricane Ike storm costs pursuant to Louisiana Act 55; and a reduction in expenses of $59 million ($38 million net-of-tax) due to the effects of recording in second quarter 2016 final court decisions in several lawsuits against the DOE related to spent nuclear fuel storage costs. See Note 3 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for additional discussion of the income tax items and Note 8 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of the DOE litigation.
Net Revenue
Utility
Following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing the
second quarter
2017
to the
second quarter
2016
:
Amount
(In Millions)
2016 net revenue
$1,524
Louisiana Act 55 financing savings obligation
16
Grand Gulf recovery
15
Retail electric price
14
Volume/weather
(18
)
Other
(2
)
2017 net revenue
$1,549
The Louisiana Act 55 financing savings obligation variance results from a regulatory charge recorded in 2016 for tax savings to be shared with customers per an agreement approved by the LPSC. The tax savings resulted from the 2010-2011 IRS audit settlement on the treatment of the Louisiana Act 55 financing of storm costs for Hurricane Gustav and Hurricane Ike. See Note 3 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing.
The Grand Gulf recovery variance is primarily due to increased recovery of higher operating costs.
The retail electric price variance is primarily due to:
•
the implementation of formula rate plan rates at Entergy Arkansas, as approved by the APSC, effective with the first billing cycle of January 2017;
•
the implementation of the transmission cost recovery factor rider at Entergy Texas, effective September 2016, and an increase in the transmission cost recovery factor rider rate, effective March 2017, as approved by the PUCT; and
•
an increase in rates at Entergy Mississippi, as approved by the MPSC, effective with the first billing cycle of July 2016.
2
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
The retail electric price variance is partially offset by a decrease in formula rate plan revenues for Entergy Louisiana, implemented with the first billing cycle of September 2016, to reflect the effects of the termination of the System Agreement.
See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the rate proceedings.
The volume/weather variance is primarily due to decreased usage during the unbilled sales period, including the effect of weather. This decrease was partially offset by an increase of 1,068 GWh, or 4%, in billed electricity usage, including an increase in industrial usage. The increase in industrial usage is primarily due to new customers in the primary metals industry.
Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing the
second quarter
2017
to the
second quarter
2016
:
Amount
(In Millions)
2016 net revenue
$293
Nuclear volume
(74
)
FitzPatrick
(44
)
Nuclear realized price changes
57
Other
18
2017 net revenue
$250
As shown in the table above, net revenue for Entergy Wholesale Commodities decreased by $43 million in the
second quarter
2017
as compared to the
second quarter
2016
primarily due to lower volume in the Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear fleet resulting from more outage days in second quarter 2017 as compared to second quarter 2016 and a decrease as a result of the absence of net revenue from the FitzPatrick plant after it was sold to Exelon in March 2017. See Note 13 to the financial statements herein for discussion of the sale. The decrease was partially offset by higher realized wholesale energy prices and higher capacity prices.
Following are key performance measures for Entergy Wholesale Commodities for the
second quarter
2017
and
2016
:
2017
2016
Owned capacity (MW) (a)
3,962
4,880
GWh billed
6,019
7,866
Entergy Wholesale Commodities Nuclear Fleet
Capacity factor
59%
76%
GWh billed
5,393
7,308
Average energy and capacity revenue per MWh
$51.76
$42.34
Refueling outage days:
Indian Point 2
—
77
Indian Point 3
47
—
Pilgrim
43
—
Palisades
27
—
(a)
The reduction in owned capacity is due to Entergy’s sale of the 838 MW FitzPatrick plant to Exelon in March 2017 and Entergy’s sale of its 50% membership interest in Top Deer Wind Ventures, LLC in November 2016. See Note 13 to the financial statements herein for discussion of the FitzPatrick sale and Note 14 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of the Top Deer Wind Ventures, LLC sale.
3
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Other Income Statement Items
Utility
Other operation and maintenance expenses increased from $582 million for the
second quarter
2016
to $609 million for the
second quarter
2017
primarily due to:
•
an increase of $18 million in nuclear generation expenses primarily due to higher nuclear labor costs, including contract labor, primarily due to increased operating costs to position the nuclear fleet to meet its operational goals, partially offset by a decrease in regulatory compliance costs. The decrease in regulatory compliance costs is primarily related to additional NRC inspection activities in 2016 as a result of the NRC’s March 2015 decision to move ANO into the “multiple/repetitive degraded cornerstone column” of the NRC’s reactor oversight process action matrix. See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –
Nuclear Matters
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the increased operating costs to position the nuclear fleet to meet its operational goals. See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
-
ANO Damage, Outage, and NRC Reviews
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the ANO stator incident and subsequent NRC reviews; and
•
an increase of $8 million in transmission and distribution expenses due to higher vegetation maintenance costs in second quarter 2017 as compared to second quarter 2016.
Taxes other than income taxes increased primarily due to increases in ad valorem taxes and local franchise taxes.
Other income increased primarily due to higher realized gains in second quarter 2017 as compared to second quarter 2016 on the decommissioning trust fund investments as a result of portfolio reallocations and an increase in the allowance for equity funds used during construction due to higher construction work in progress in 2017, which included the St. Charles Power Station project.
Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Other operation and maintenance expenses increased from $171 million for the second quarter 2016 to $204 million for the second quarter 2017 primarily due to the effect of recording in 2016 final court decisions in litigation against the DOE for the reimbursement of spent nuclear fuel storage costs, which reduced other operation and maintenance expenses in 2016 by $42 million, and an increase of $28 million in severance and retention costs in the second quarter 2017 as compared to the second quarter 2016 due to management’s strategy to reduce the size of the Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ merchant fleet. See Note 8 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of the DOE litigation. See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
-
Entergy Wholesale Commodities Exit from the Merchant Power Business
” below and in the Form 10-K for a discussion of management’s strategy to reduce the size of the Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ merchant fleet. The increase was partially offset by a decrease due to the absence of other operation and maintenance expenses from the FitzPatrick plant after it was sold to Exelon in March 2017. See Note 13 to the financial statements herein for discussion of the sale.
The asset write-offs, impairments, and related charges variance is primarily due to $194 million ($126 million net-of-tax) of impairment charges in the second quarter 2017 due to nuclear fuel spending, nuclear refueling outage spending, and expenditures for capital assets being charged to expense as incurred as a result of the impaired value of the Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear plants’ long-lived assets due to the significantly reduced remaining estimated operating lives associated with management’s strategy to reduce the size of the Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ merchant fleet. The increase in impairment charges in 2017 is primarily due to the impairment of the Indian Point and Palisades plants in fourth quarter 2016 and the timing of nuclear refueling outage spending for the Pilgrim plant. See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
Entergy Wholesale
4
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Commodities Exit from the Merchant Power Business
” below and in the Form 10-K for a discussion of management’s strategy to reduce the size of the Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ merchant fleet.
Other income increased primarily due to higher realized gains in second quarter 2017 as compared to second quarter 2016 on the decommissioning trust fund investments primarily as a result of portfolio reallocations.
Other expenses increased primarily due to increases in decommissioning expenses primarily as a result of a trust transfer agreement Entergy entered into with NYPA in August 2016, which closed in January 2017, to transfer the decommissioning trust and decommissioning liability for the Indian Point 3 plant to Entergy and revisions to the estimated decommissioning cost liabilities for the Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ Indian Point 2 and Palisades plants as a result of revised decommissioning cost studies in the fourth quarter 2016. See Note 9 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of the revised decommissioning cost studies. The increase was partially offset by a reduction in deferred refueling outage amortization costs related to the impairments of the Indian Point 3, Indian Point 2, and Palisades plants and related assets. See Note 14 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of the impairments and related charges.
Income Taxes
The effective income tax rate was (442.1%) for the
second quarter
2017
. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the
second quarter
2017
versus the federal statutory rate of 35% was primarily due to tax elections to treat as corporations for federal income tax purposes two subsidiaries that each own an Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear power plant, which resulted in both permanent and temporary differences under the income tax accounting standards. See Note 10 to the financial statements herein for additional discussion of the tax elections.
The effective income tax rate was (76.9%) for the
second quarter
2016
. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the
second quarter
2016
versus the federal statutory rate of 35% was primarily due to a tax election to treat as a corporation for federal income tax purposes a subsidiary that owns an Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear power plant, which resulted in reduced income tax expense and the reversal of a portion of the provision for uncertain tax positions as a result of the settlement of the 2010-2011 IRS audit in the second quarter 2016. See Note 3 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for additional discussion of the tax election and the tax settlements.
5
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2017
Compared to
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2016
Following are income statement variances for Utility, Entergy Wholesale Commodities, Parent & Other, and Entergy comparing the
six months ended
June 30, 2017
to the
six months ended
June 30, 2016
showing how much the line item increased or (decreased) in comparison to the prior period:
Utility
Entergy
Wholesale
Commodities
Parent &
Other (a)
Entergy
(In Thousands)
2016 Consolidated Net Income (Loss)
$579,968
$330,430
($102,566
)
$807,832
Net revenue (operating revenue less fuel expense, purchased power, and other regulatory charges/credits)
54,405
(14,889
)
(11
)
39,505
Other operation and maintenance
80,763
115,205
703
196,671
Asset write-offs, impairments, and related charges
—
391,033
—
391,033
Taxes other than income taxes
18,206
(8,008
)
391
10,589
Depreciation and amortization
25,283
2,587
(216
)
27,654
Gain on sale of assets
—
16,270
—
16,270
Other income
26,282
56,768
652
83,702
Interest expense
(13,233
)
(41
)
3,546
(9,728
)
Other expenses
10,339
41,654
—
51,993
Income taxes
125,292
(350,540
)
4,925
(220,323
)
2017 Consolidated Net Income (Loss)
$414,005
$196,689
($111,274
)
$499,420
(a)
Parent & Other includes eliminations, which are primarily intersegment activity.
Refer to “
ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES -
SELECTED OPERATING RESULTS
” for further information with respect to operating statistics.
Results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2017 include $405 million ($263 million net-of-tax) of impairment charges due to costs being charged to expense as incurred as a result of the impaired value of the Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear plants’ long-lived assets due to the significantly reduced remaining estimated operating lives associated with management’s strategy to reduce the size of the Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ merchant fleet and a reduction of income tax expense, net of unrecognized tax benefits, of $373 million as a result of tax elections to treat as corporations for federal income tax purposes two subsidiaries that each own an Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear power plant. See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
-
Entergy Wholesale Commodities Exit from the Merchant Power Business
” below and in the Form 10-K for a discussion of management’s strategy to reduce the size of the Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ merchant fleet and Note 10 to the financial statements herein for additional discussion of the tax elections.
Results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2016 include a reduction of income tax expense, net of unrecognized tax benefits, of $238 million as a result of a tax election to treat as a corporation for federal income tax purposes a subsidiary that owns an Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear power plant; income tax benefits as a result of the settlement of the 2010-2011 IRS audit, including a $75 million tax benefit recognized by Entergy Louisiana related to the treatment of the Vidalia purchased power agreement and a $54 million net benefit recognized by Entergy Louisiana related to the treatment of proceeds received in 2010 for the financing of Hurricane Gustav and Hurricane Ike storm costs pursuant to Louisiana Act 55; and a reduction in expenses of $59 million ($38 million net-of-tax) due to the effects of recording in second quarter 2016 final court decisions in several lawsuits against the DOE related to spent nuclear fuel storage costs. See Note 3 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for additional discussion of the income tax items and Note 8 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of the DOE litigation.
6
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Net Revenue
Utility
Following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing the
six months ended
June 30, 2017
to the
six months ended
June 30, 2016
:
Amount
(In Millions)
2016 net revenue
$2,899
Retail electric price
45
Grand Gulf recovery
27
Louisiana Act 55 financing savings obligation
16
Volume/weather
(30
)
Other
(3
)
2017 net revenue
$2,954
The retail electric price variance is primarily due to:
•
an increase in base rates effective February 24, 2016 and the implementation of formula rate plan rates effective with the first billing cycle of January 2017 at Entergy Arkansas, each as approved by the APSC. A significant portion of the base rate increase was related to the purchase of Power Block 2 of the Union Power Station in March 2016;
•
an increase in formula rate plan revenues for Entergy Louisiana, implemented with the first billing cycle of March 2016, to collect the estimated first-year revenue requirement related to the purchase of Power Blocks 3 and 4 of the Union Power Station in March 2016;
•
the implementation of the transmission cost recovery factor rider at Entergy Texas, effective September 2016, and an increase in the transmission cost recovery factor rider rate, effective March 2017, as approved by the PUCT;
•
an increase in rates at Entergy Mississippi, as approved by the MPSC, effective with the first billing cycle of July 2016; and
•
an increase in the purchased power and capacity acquisition cost recovery rider for Entergy New Orleans, as approved by the City Council, effective with the first billing cycle of March 2016, primarily related to the purchase of Power Block 1 of the Union Power Station in March 2016.
The retail electric price variance is partially offset by a decrease in formula rate plan revenues for Entergy Louisiana, implemented with the first billing cycle of September 2016, to reflect the effects of the termination of the System Agreement.
See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the rate proceedings. See Note 14 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of the Union Power Station purchase.
The Grand Gulf recovery variance is primarily due to increased recovery of higher operating costs.
The Louisiana Act 55 financing savings obligation variance results from a regulatory charge in 2016 for tax savings to be shared with customers per an agreement approved by the LPSC. The tax savings resulted from the 2010-2011 IRS audit settlement on the treatment of the Louisiana Act 55 financing of storm costs for Hurricane Gustav and Hurricane Ike. See Note 3 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing.
The volume/weather variance is primarily due to decreased usage during the unbilled sales period, including the effect of weather. This decrease was partially offset by an increase of 551 GWh, or 1%, in billed electricity usage,
7
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
including an increase in industrial usage. The increase in industrial usage is primarily due to new customers in the primary metals and industrial gases industries and expansion projects primarily in the chemicals industry.
Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing the
six months ended
June 30, 2017
to the
six months ended
June 30, 2016
:
Amount
(In Millions)
2016 net revenue
$759
Nuclear volume
(79
)
FitzPatrick
(72
)
Nuclear fuel expenses
37
FitzPatrick reimbursement agreement
98
Other
1
2017 net revenue
$744
As shown in the table above, net revenue for Entergy Wholesale Commodities decreased by $15 million in the
six months ended
June 30, 2017
as compared to the
six months ended
June 30, 2016
primarily due to lower volume in the Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear fleet resulting from more outage days in the six months ended June 30, 2017 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2016 and a decrease as a result of the absence of net revenue from the FitzPatrick plant after it was sold to Exelon in March 2017. See Note 13 to the financial statements herein for discussion of the sale. The decrease was partially offset by a decrease in nuclear fuel expenses primarily related to the impairments of the Pilgrim and Palisades plants and related assets and an increase resulting from the reimbursement agreement with Exelon pursuant to which Exelon was reimbursing Entergy for specified out-of-pocket costs associated with preparing for the refueling and operation of FitzPatrick that otherwise would have been avoided had Entergy shut down FitzPatrick in January 2017. Revenues received from Exelon in 2017 under the reimbursement agreement were offset in other operation and maintenance expenses and taxes other than income taxes and had no material effect on net income. See Note 13 to the financial statements herein and Note 14 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the reimbursement agreement.
Following are key performance measures for Entergy Wholesale Commodities for the
six months ended
June 30, 2017
and
2016
:
2017
2016
Owned capacity (MW) (a)
3,962
4,880
GWh billed
14,382
17,112
Entergy Wholesale Commodities Nuclear Fleet
Capacity factor
71%
83%
GWh billed
13,228
15,996
Average energy and capacity revenue per MWh
$53.79
$49.85
Refueling outage days:
FitzPatrick
42
—
Indian Point 2
—
102
Indian Point 3
66
—
Pilgrim
43
—
Palisades
27
—
8
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
(a)
The reduction in owned capacity is due to Entergy’s sale of the 838 MW FitzPatrick plant to Exelon in March 2017 and Entergy’s sale of its 50% membership interest in Top Deer Wind Ventures, LLC in November 2016. See Note 13 to the financial statements herein for discussion of the FitzPatrick sale and Note 14 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of the Top Deer Wind Ventures, LLC sale.
Other Income Statement Items
Utility
Other operation and maintenance expenses increased from $1,096 million for the
six months ended
June 30, 2016
to $1,177 million for the
six months ended
June 30, 2017
primarily due to:
•
an increase of $18 million in nuclear generation expenses primarily due to higher nuclear labor costs, including contract labor, primarily due to increased operating costs to position the nuclear fleet to meet its operational goals, and additional training and initiatives to support management’s operational goals at Grand Gulf, partially offset by a decrease in regulatory compliance costs. The decrease in regulatory compliance costs is primarily related to additional NRC inspection activities in 2016 as a result of the NRC’s March 2015 decision to move ANO into the “multiple/repetitive degraded cornerstone column” of the NRC’s reactor oversight process action matrix. See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –
Nuclear Matters
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the increased operating costs to position the nuclear fleet to meet its operational goals. See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
-
ANO Damage, Outage, and NRC Reviews
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the ANO stator incident and subsequent NRC reviews;
•
the deferral in first quarter 2016 of $7.7 million of previously-incurred costs related to ANO post-Fukushima compliance and $9.9 million of previously-incurred costs related to ANO flood barrier compliance, as approved by the APSC in February 2016 as part of the Entergy Arkansas 2015 rate case settlement. These costs are being amortized over a ten-year period beginning March 2016. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the rate case settlement;
•
an increase of $11 million in compensation and benefits costs primarily due to a downward revision to estimated incentive compensation expense in first quarter 2016 and an increase in net periodic pension and other postretirement benefits costs as a result of lower discount rates;
•
an increase of $10 million in transmission and distribution expenses due to higher vegetation maintenance costs in 2017; and
•
an increase of $5 million in information technology expenses including software maintenance costs and upgrade projects.
Taxes other than income taxes increased primarily due to increases in local franchise taxes and ad valorem taxes.
Depreciation and amortization expenses increased primarily due to additions to plant in service, including the Union Power Station purchased in March 2016. See Note 14 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of the Union Power Station purchase.
Other income increased primarily due to higher realized gains in the six months ended June 30, 2017 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2016 on the decommissioning trust fund investments, including portfolio reallocations, and an increase in the allowance for equity funds used during construction due to higher construction work in progress in 2017, which included the St. Charles Power Station project.
9
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Other operation and maintenance expenses increased from $384 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 to $500 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 primarily due to:
•
FitzPatrick’s nuclear refueling outage expenses and expenditures for capital assets being classified as other operation and maintenance expenses as a result of the sales and reimbursement agreements Entergy entered into with Exelon. These costs would have not been incurred absent the sales agreement with Exelon because Entergy planned to shut the plant down in January 2017. The expenses were offset by revenue realized pursuant to the reimbursement agreement and had no effect on net income. See Note 13 to the financial statements herein and Note 14 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of the reimbursement agreement;
•
the effect of recording in 2016 final court decisions in litigation against the DOE for the reimbursement of spent nuclear fuel storage costs, which reduced other operation and maintenance expenses in 2016 by $42 million. See Note 8 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of the DOE litigation; and
•
an increase of $39 million in severance and retention costs in the six months ended June 30, 2017 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2016 due to management’s strategy to reduce the size of the Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ merchant fleet. See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
-
Entergy Wholesale Commodities Exit from the Merchant Power Business
” below and in the Form 10-K for a discussion of management’s strategy to reduce the size of the Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ merchant fleet.
The increase was partially offset by a decrease due to the absence of other operation and maintenance expenses from the FitzPatrick plant after it was sold to Exelon in March 2017. See Note 13 to the financial statements herein for discussion of the sale.
The asset write-offs, impairments, and related charges variance is primarily due to $405 million ($263 million net-of-tax) of impairment charges in the six months ended June 30, 2017 due to nuclear fuel spending, nuclear refueling outage spending, and expenditures for capital assets being charged to expense as incurred as a result of the impaired value of the Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear plants’ long-lived assets due to the significantly reduced remaining estimated operating lives associated with management’s strategy to reduce the size of the Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ merchant fleet. The increase in impairment charges in 2017 is primarily due to the impairment of the Indian Point and Palisades plants in fourth quarter 2016 and the timing of nuclear fuel spending and nuclear refueling outage spending for the Pilgrim plant. See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
Entergy Wholesale Commodities Exit from the Merchant Power Business
” below and in the Form 10-K for a discussion of management’s strategy to reduce the size of the Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ merchant fleet.
The gain on sale of assets resulted from the sale in March 2017 of the 838 MW FitzPatrick plant to Exelon. Entergy sold the FitzPatrick plant for approximately $110 million, including the $10 million non-refundable signing fee paid in August 2016, in addition to the assumption by Exelon of certain liabilities related to the FitzPatrick plant, resulting in a pre-tax gain of $16 million on the sale. See Note 13 to the financial statements herein for a discussion of the sale.
Other income increased primarily due to higher realized gains in the six months ended June 30, 2017 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2016 on the decommissioning trust fund investments as a result of portfolio reallocations and the increase in value from year-end realized upon the receipt from NYPA of the decommissioning trust funds for the Indian Point 3 and FitzPatrick plants in January 2017. See Note 9 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of the trust transfer agreement with NYPA.
Other expenses increased primarily due to increases in decommissioning expenses primarily as a result of a trust transfer agreement Entergy entered into with NYPA in August 2016, which closed in January 2017, to transfer the decommissioning trusts and decommissioning liabilities for the Indian Point 3 and FitzPatrick plants to Entergy and revisions to the estimated decommissioning cost liabilities for the Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ Indian Point
10
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
2 and Palisades plants as a result of revised decommissioning cost studies in the fourth quarter 2016. See Note 9 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of the trust transfer agreement with NYPA and the revised decommissioning cost studies. The increase was partially offset by a reduction in deferred refueling outage amortization costs related to the impairments of the Indian Point 3, Indian Point 2, and Palisades plants and related assets. See Note 14 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of the impairments and related charges.
Income Taxes
The effective income tax rate was (193.7%) for the
six months ended
June 30, 2017
. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the
six months ended
June 30, 2017
versus the federal statutory rate of 35% was primarily due to tax elections to treat as corporations for federal income tax purposes two subsidiaries that each own an Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear power plant, which resulted in both permanent and temporary differences under the income tax accounting standards and the re-determined tax basis of the FitzPatrick plant as a result of its sale on March 31, 2017. See Note 10 to the financial statements herein for further discussion of the tax elections and the tax benefit associated with the sale of FitzPatrick.
The effective income tax rate was (15.6%) for the
six months ended
June 30, 2016
. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the
six months ended
June 30, 2016
versus the federal statutory rate of 35% was primarily due to a tax election to treat as a corporation for federal income tax purposes a subsidiary that owns an Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear power plant, which resulted in reduced income tax expense and the reversal of a portion of the provision for uncertain tax positions as a result of the settlement of the 2010-2011 IRS audit in the second quarter 2016. See Note 3 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for additional discussion of the tax election and the tax settlements.
ANO Damage, Outage, and NRC Reviews
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
ANO Damage, Outage, and NRC Reviews
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the ANO stator incident, subsequent NRC reviews, and the deferral of replacement power costs.
Entergy Wholesale Commodities Exit from the Merchant Power Business
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
Entergy Wholesale Commodities Exit from the Merchant Power Business
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of management’s strategy to reduce the size of the Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ merchant fleet. Following are updates to that discussion.
Entergy expects to incur employee retention and severance expenses associated with management’s strategy to reduce the size of the Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ merchant fleet of approximately $110 million in 2017, of which $66 million had been incurred as of June 30, 2017, and approximately $250 million from 2018 through the end of 2021. In addition, Entergy Wholesale Commodities incurred impairment charges related to nuclear fuel spending, nuclear refueling outage spending, and expenditures for capital assets of $194 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, and $405 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017.
These costs are charged to expense as incurred as a result of the impaired value of the Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear plants’ long-lived assets due to the significantly reduced remaining estimated operating lives associated with management’s strategy to reduce the size of the Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ merchant fleet. Entergy expects to continue to incur costs associated with nuclear fuel-related spending and expenditures for capital assets, and expects to continue to charge these costs to expense as incurred over the remaining operating lives of the plants because Entergy expects the value of those plants to continue to be impaired.
In March 2017 the NRC approved the sale of the FitzPatrick plant, an 838 MW nuclear power plant owned by Entergy in the Entergy Wholesale Commodities segment, to Exelon. The transaction closed in March 2017 for a purchase price of $110 million, including the $10 million non-refundable signing fee paid in August 2016, in addition
11
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
to the assumption by Exelon of certain liabilities related to the FitzPatrick plant, resulting in a pre-tax gain on the sale of $16 million. At the transaction close, Exelon paid an additional $8 million for the proration of certain expenses prepaid by Entergy. See Note 13 to the financial statements herein for further discussion of the sale of FitzPatrick. As discussed in Note 10 to the financial statements herein, as a result of the sale of FitzPatrick, Entergy re-determined the plant’s tax basis, resulting in a $44 million income tax benefit in the first quarter 2017.
Entergy Wholesale Commodities Authorizations to Operate Its Nuclear Power Plants
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
Entergy Wholesale Commodities Authorizations to Operate Its Nuclear Power Plants
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the NRC operating licensing proceedings for Indian Point 2 and Indian Point 3 and the settlement reached with New York State. Following are updates to that discussion.
In accordance with the settlement with New York State, in March 2017 the New York State Department of State issued a concurrence with Indian Point’s new Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA) consistency certification and, on Entergy’s motion, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York dismissed Entergy’s appeal related to the initial Indian Point CZMA consistency certification. Also in March 2017 the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board of the NRC granted the motion of New York State and Riverkeeper to withdraw their pending contentions on the NRC license renewal application and terminated the proceedings. Subsequent to the issuance of the water quality certification and water discharge permit in January 2017 by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC), in April 2017 the NYSDEC updated its environmental analysis to reflect the early shutdown per the settlement agreement. Both the water quality certification and the CZMA concurrence were filed with the NRC in April 2017.
In May 2017 a plaintiff filed two parallel state court appeals challenging New York State’s actions in signing and implementing the Indian Point settlement with Entergy on the basis that the State failed to perform sufficient environmental analysis of its actions. All signatories to the settlement agreement, including the Entergy affiliates that hold NRC licenses for Indian Point, were named.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
Liquidity and Capital Resources
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy’s capital structure, capital expenditure plans and other uses of capital, and sources of capital. Following are updates to that discussion.
Capital Structure
Entergy’s capitalization is balanced between equity and debt, as shown in the following table.
June 30,
2017
December 31,
2016
Debt to capital
65.5
%
64.8
%
Effect of excluding securitization bonds
(0.8
%)
(1.0
%)
Debt to capital, excluding securitization bonds (a)
64.7
%
63.8
%
Effect of subtracting cash
(1.5
%)
(2.0
%)
Net debt to net capital, excluding securitization bonds (a)
63.2
%
61.8
%
(a)
Calculation excludes the Arkansas, Louisiana, New Orleans, and Texas securitization bonds, which are non-recourse to Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy New Orleans, and Entergy Texas, respectively.
Net debt consists of debt less cash and cash equivalents. Debt consists of notes payable and commercial paper, capital lease obligations, and long-term debt, including the currently maturing portion. Capital consists of debt, common
12
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
shareholders’ equity, and subsidiaries’ preferred stock without sinking fund. Net capital consists of capital less cash and cash equivalents. Entergy uses the debt to capital ratios excluding securitization bonds in analyzing its financial condition and believes they provide useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating Entergy’s financial condition because the securitization bonds are non-recourse to Entergy, as more fully described in Note 5 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K. Entergy also uses the net debt to net capital ratio excluding securitization bonds in analyzing its financial condition and believes it provides useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating Entergy’s financial condition because net debt indicates Entergy’s outstanding debt position that could not be readily satisfied by cash and cash equivalents on hand.
Entergy Corporation has in place a credit facility that has a borrowing capacity of $3.5 billion and expires in August 2021. Entergy Corporation also has the ability to issue letters of credit against 50% of the total borrowing capacity of the credit facility. The commitment fee is currently 0.225% of the undrawn commitment amount. Commitment fees and interest rates on loans under the credit facility can fluctuate depending on the senior unsecured debt ratings of Entergy Corporation. The weighted average interest rate for the
six months ended June 30, 2017
was
2.38%
on the drawn portion of the facility. Following is a summary of the borrowings outstanding and capacity available under the facility as of
June 30, 2017
:
Capacity
Borrowings
Letters
of Credit
Capacity
Available
(In Millions)
$3,500
$225
$6
$3,269
A covenant in Entergy Corporation’s credit facility requires Entergy to maintain a consolidated debt ratio, as defined, of 65% or less of its total capitalization. The calculation of this debt ratio under Entergy Corporation’s credit facility is different than the calculation of the debt to capital ratio above. Entergy is currently in compliance with the covenant and expects to remain in compliance with this covenant. If Entergy fails to meet this ratio, or if Entergy or one of the Utility operating companies (except Entergy New Orleans) defaults on other indebtedness or is in bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings, an acceleration of the facility’s maturity date may occur. See Note 4 to the financial statements herein for additional discussion of the Entergy Corporation credit facility and discussion of the Registrant Subsidiaries’ credit facilities.
Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee has a credit facility guaranteed by Entergy Corporation with a borrowing capacity of $100 million, which expires in January 2018. As of June 30, 2017, $71 million in cash borrowings were outstanding under the credit facility. The weighted average interest rate for the six months ended
June 30, 2017
was
2.44%
on the drawn portion of the facility. Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee also has an uncommitted credit facility guaranteed by Entergy Corporation with a borrowing capacity of $85 million, which expires in January 2018. As of June 30, 2017, there were no cash borrowings outstanding under the uncommitted credit facility. See Note 4 to the financial statements herein for additional discussion of the Vermont Yankee facilities.
Entergy Corporation has a commercial paper program with a Board-approved program limit of up to $1.5 billion. As of
June 30, 2017
, Entergy Corporation had $1.1 billion of commercial paper outstanding. The weighted-average interest rate for the six months ended
June 30, 2017
was 1.38%.
Capital Expenditure Plans and Other Uses of Capital
See the table and discussion in the Form 10-K under “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
Liquidity and Capital Resources
- Capital Expenditure Plans and Other Uses of Capital
,” that sets forth the amounts of planned construction and other capital investments by operating segment for 2017 through 2019. Following are updates to the discussion.
13
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Lake Charles Power Station
In November 2016, Entergy Louisiana filed an application with the LPSC seeking certification that the public convenience and necessity would be served by the construction of the Lake Charles Power Station, a nominal 994 MW combined-cycle generating unit in Westlake, Louisiana, on land adjacent to the existing Nelson plant in Calcasieu Parish. The current estimated cost of the Lake Charles Power Station is $872 million, including estimated costs of transmission interconnection and other related costs. In May 2017 the parties to the proceeding agreed to an uncontested stipulation finding that construction of the Lake Charles Power Station is in the public interest and authorizing an in-service rate recovery plan. In July 2017 the LPSC issued an order unanimously approving the stipulation. Subject to the timely receipt of other permits and approvals, commercial operation is estimated to occur by mid-2020.
New Orleans Power Station
In June 2016, Entergy New Orleans filed an application with the City Council seeking a public interest determination and authorization to construct the New Orleans Power Station, a 226 MW advanced combustion turbine in New Orleans, Louisiana, at the site of the existing Michoud generating facility, which facility was deactivated effective May 31, 2016. In January 2017 several intervenors filed testimony opposing the construction of the New Orleans Power Station on various grounds. In July 2017, Entergy New Orleans submitted a supplemental and amending application to the City Council seeking approval to construct either the originally proposed 226 MW advanced combustion turbine, or alternatively, a 128 MW unit composed of natural gas-fired reciprocating engines and a related cost recovery plan. The application included an updated cost estimate of $232 million for the 226 MW advanced combustion turbine. The cost estimate for the alternative 128 MW unit is $210 million. In addition, the application renewed the commitment to pursue up to 100 MW of renewable resources to serve New Orleans. In July 2017 the Utility Committee of the City Council established a procedural schedule that provides for a hearing in December 2017 and the City Council’s decision in February 2018. The commercial operation date is dependent on the alternative selected by the City Council and the receipt of other permits and approvals.
Montgomery County Power Station
In October 2016, Entergy Texas filed an application with the PUCT seeking certification that the public convenience and necessity would be served by the construction of the Montgomery County Power Station, a nominal 993 MW combined-cycle generating unit in Montgomery County, Texas on land adjacent to the existing Lewis Creek plant. The current estimated cost of the Montgomery County Power Station is $937 million, including estimated costs of transmission interconnection and network upgrades and other related costs. The independent monitor, who oversaw the request for proposal process, filed testimony and a report affirming that the Montgomery County Power Station was selected through an objective and fair request for proposal process that showed no undue preference to any proposal. In June 2017, parties to the proceeding filed an unopposed stipulation and settlement agreement. The stipulation contemplates that Entergy Texas’s level of cost-recovery for generation construction costs for Montgomery County Power Station is capped at $831 million, subject to certain exclusions such as force majeure events. Also in June 2017, the administrative law judge issued a proposed order and remanded the proceeding to the PUCT for final decision. In July 2017 the PUCT approved the stipulation. Subject to the timely receipt of other permits and approvals, commercial operation is estimated to occur by mid-2021.
Washington Parish Energy Center
In April 2017, Entergy Louisiana signed a purchase and sale agreement with a subsidiary of Calpine Corporation for the acquisition of a peaking plant. Calpine will construct the plant, which will consist of two natural gas-fired combustion turbine units with a total nominal capacity of approximately 360 MW. The plant, named the Washington Parish Energy Center, will be located in Bogalusa, Louisiana and, subject to permits and approvals, is expected to be completed in 2021. Subject to regulatory approvals, Entergy Louisiana will purchase the plant once it is complete for an estimated total investment of approximately $261 million, including transmission and other related costs. In May
14
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
2017, Entergy Louisiana filed an application with the LPSC seeking certification of the plant. A procedural schedule has been established, with a hearing in March 2018.
Dividends
Declarations of dividends on Entergy’s common stock are made at the discretion of the Board. Among other things, the Board evaluates the level of Entergy’s common stock dividends based upon earnings per share from the Utility operating segment and the Parent and Other portion of the business, financial strength, and future investment opportunities. At its July 2017 meeting, the Board declared a dividend of
$0.87
per share, which is the same quarterly dividend per share that Entergy has paid since the fourth quarter 2016.
Cash Flow Activity
As shown in Entergy’s Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, cash flows for the
six months ended
June 30, 2017
and
2016
were as follows:
2017
2016
(In Millions)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
$1,188
$1,351
Cash flow provided by (used in):
Operating activities
820
1,252
Investing activities
(1,770
)
(2,266
)
Financing activities
697
659
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
(253
)
(355
)
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$935
$996
Operating Activities
Net cash flow provided by operating activities decreased by $432 million for the
six months ended
June 30, 2017
compared to the
six months ended
June 30, 2016
primarily due to:
•
an increase of $160 million in spending on nuclear refueling outages in 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016;
•
lower Entergy Wholesale Commodities net revenue, excluding the effect of revenues resulting from the FitzPatrick reimbursement agreement with Exelon, in 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016, as discussed above. See Note 13 to the financial statements herein and Note 14 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of the reimbursement agreement;
•
a decrease due to the timing of recovery of fuel and purchased power costs in 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016. See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for a discussion of fuel and purchased power cost recovery;
•
an increase of $94 million in severance and retention payments in 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016. See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
-
Entergy Wholesale Commodities Exit from the Merchant Power Business
” above and in the Form 10-K for a discussion of management’s strategy to reduce the size of the Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ merchant fleet; and
•
a refund to customers in January 2017 of approximately $71 million as a result of the settlement approved by the LPSC related to the Waterford 3 replacement steam generator project. See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for discussion of the settlement and refund.
15
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
The decrease was partially offset by:
•
income tax refunds of $15 million in 2017 compared to income tax payments of $85 million in 2016. Entergy received income tax refunds in 2017 resulting from the carryback of net operating losses. Entergy made income tax payments in 2016 related to the effect of the 2006-2007 IRS audit and for jurisdictions that do not have net operating loss carryovers or jurisdictions in which the utilization of net operating loss carryovers are limited. See Note 3 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the income tax audit;
•
a decrease of $76 million in interest paid in 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 primarily due to an interest payment of $60 million made in March 2016 related to the purchase of a beneficial interest in the Waterford 3 leased assets. See Note 10 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy Louisiana’s purchase of a beneficial interest in the Waterford 3 leased assets; and
•
a decrease of $23 million in spending in 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 on activities related to the decommissioning of Vermont Yankee, which ceased power production in December 2014.
Investing Activities
Net cash flow used in investing activities decreased $496 million for the
six months ended
June 30, 2017
compared to the
six months ended
June 30, 2016
primarily due to the purchase of the Union Power Station for approximately $948 million in March 2016 and proceeds of $100 million from the sale in March 2017 of the FitzPatrick plant to Exelon. See Note 14 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of the Union Power Station purchase and Note 13 to the financial statements herein for a discussion of the sale of FitzPatrick.
The decrease was partially offset by:
•
an increase of $425 million in construction expenditures, primarily in the Utility business. The increase in construction expenditures in the Utility business is primarily due to an increase of $251 million in fossil-fueled generation construction expenditures primarily due to a higher scope of work performed on various projects in 2017, including the St. Charles Power Station project, an increase of $73 million in nuclear construction expenditures primarily due to increased spending on various nuclear projects in 2017, and an increase of $61 million in distribution construction expenditures primarily due to a higher scope of work performed in 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016;
•
fluctuations in nuclear fuel activity because of variations from year to year in the timing and pricing of fuel reload requirements in the Utility business, material and services deliveries, and the timing of cash payments during the nuclear fuel cycle; and
•
proceeds of $25 million received in 2017 compared to proceeds of $89 million received in 2016 from the DOE resulting from litigation regarding spent nuclear fuel storage costs that were previously capitalized. See Note 1 to the financial statements herein and Note 8 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of the DOE litigation.
Financing Activities
Net cash flow provided by financing activities increased $38 million for the
six months ended
June 30, 2017
compared to the
six months ended
June 30, 2016
primarily due to an increase of $372 million in net issuances of commercial paper in 2017 compared to the same period in 2016.
The increase was partially offset by:
•
long-term debt activity providing approximately $170 million of cash in 2017 compared to providing approximately $437 million of cash in 2016. Included in the long-term debt activity is $475 million in 2017 and $595 million in 2016 for the repayment of borrowings on the Entergy Corporation long-term credit facility; and
16
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
•
a decrease of $67 million in 2017 in short-term borrowings by the nuclear fuel company variable interest entities.
For the details of Entergy’s commercial paper program, the nuclear fuel company variable interest entities’ short-term borrowings, and long-term debt see Note 4 to the financial statements herein and Note 5 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K.
Rate, Cost-recovery, and Other Regulation
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
Rate, Cost-recovery, and Other Regulation
” in the Form 10-K for discussions of rate regulation, federal regulation, and related regulatory proceedings.
State and Local Rate Regulation and Fuel-Cost Recovery
See Note 2 to the financial statements herein for updates to the discussion in the Form 10-K regarding these proceedings.
Federal Regulation
See Note 2 to the financial statements herein for updates to the discussion in the Form 10-K regarding federal regulatory proceedings.
Market and Credit Risk Sensitive Instruments
Commodity Price Risk
Power Generation
As a wholesale generator, Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ core business is selling energy, measured in MWh, to its customers. Entergy Wholesale Commodities enters into forward contracts with its customers and also sells energy in the day ahead or spot markets. In addition to selling the energy produced by its plants, Entergy Wholesale Commodities sells unforced capacity, which allows load-serving entities to meet specified reserve and related requirements placed on them by the ISOs in their respective areas. Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ forward physical power contracts consist of contracts to sell energy only, contracts to sell capacity only, and bundled contracts in which it sells both capacity and energy. While the terminology and payment mechanics vary in these contracts, each of these types of contracts requires Entergy Wholesale Commodities to deliver MWh of energy, make capacity available, or both. In addition to its forward physical power contracts, Entergy Wholesale Commodities also uses a combination of financial contracts, including swaps, collars, and options, to manage forward commodity price risk. Certain hedge volumes have price downside and upside relative to market price movement. The contracted minimum, expected value, and sensitivities are provided in the table below to show potential variations. The sensitivities may not reflect the total maximum upside potential from higher market prices. The information contained in the following table represents projections at a point in time and will vary over time based on numerous factors, such as future market prices, contracting activities, and generation. Following is a summary of Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ current forward capacity and generation contracts as well as total revenue projections based on market prices as of
June 30, 2017
(
2017
represents the remainder of the year):
17
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Entergy Wholesale Commodities Nuclear Portfolio
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Energy
Percent of planned generation under contract (a):
Unit-contingent (b)
89%
76%
41%
—%
—%
Firm LD (c)
9%
7%
—%
—%
—%
Offsetting positions (d)
(9%)
(10%)
—%
—%
—%
Total
89%
73%
41%
—%
—%
Planned generation (TWh) (e) (f)
15.0
26.7
18.8
11.7
2.9
Average revenue per MWh on contracted volumes:
Minimum
$40.7
$35.9
$35.3
$—
$—
Expected based on market prices as of June 30, 2017
$40.7
$35.9
$35.3
$—
$—
Sensitivity: -/+ $10 per MWh market price change
$40.7-$40.8
$34.9-$36.9
$35.3
$—
$—
Capacity
Percent of capacity sold forward (g):
Bundled capacity and energy contracts (h)
24%
11%
—%
—%
—%
Capacity contracts (i)
41%
24%
14%
—%
—%
Total
65%
35%
14%
—%
—%
Planned net MW in operation (average) (f)
3,568
3,365
2,356
1,384
347
Average revenue under contract per kW per month (applies to capacity contracts only)
$8.5
$9.1
$10.5
$—
$—
Total Nuclear Energy and Capacity Revenues (j)
Expected sold and market total revenue per MWh
$47.4
$43.6
$43.9
$44.3
$50.0
Sensitivity: -/+ $10 per MWh market price change
$46.2-$48.6
$41.0-$46.3
$38.0-$49.8
$34.3-$54.3
$40.0-$60.0
(a)
Percent of planned generation output sold or purchased forward under contracts, forward physical contracts, forward financial contracts, or options that mitigate price uncertainty that may require regulatory approval or approval of transmission rights. Positions that are not classified as hedges are netted in the planned generation under contract.
(b)
Transaction under which power is supplied from a specific generation asset; if the asset is not operating, the seller is generally not liable to buyer for any damages. Certain unit-contingent sales include a guarantee of availability. Availability guarantees provide for the payment to the power purchaser of contract damages, if incurred, in the event the seller fails to deliver power as a result of the failure of the specified generation unit to generate power at or above a specified availability threshold. All of Entergy’s outstanding guarantees of availability provide for dollar limits on Entergy’s maximum liability under such guarantees.
(c)
Transaction that requires receipt or delivery of energy at a specified delivery point (usually at a market hub not associated with a specific asset) or settles financially on notional quantities; if a party fails to deliver or receive energy, defaulting party must compensate the other party as specified in the contract, a portion of which may be capped through the use of risk management products. This also includes option transactions that may expire without being exercised.
(d)
Transactions for the purchase of energy, generally to offset a Firm LD transaction.
(e)
Amount of output expected to be generated by Entergy Wholesale Commodities resources considering plant operating characteristics, outage schedules, and expected market conditions that affect dispatch.
18
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
(f)
Assumes the planned shutdown of Palisades on October 1, 2018, planned shutdown of Pilgrim on May 31, 2019, planned shutdown of Indian Point 2 on April 30, 2020, and planned shutdown of Indian Point 3 on April 30, 2021, and reflects the sale of FitzPatrick in March 2017. Assumes NRC license renewals for two units, as follows (with current license expirations in parentheses): Indian Point 2 (September 2013 and now operating under its period of extended operations while its application is pending) and Indian Point 3 (December 2015 and now operating under its period of extended operations while its application is pending). For a discussion regarding the planned shutdown of the Palisades, Pilgrim, Indian Point 2, and Indian Point 3 plants, see “
Entergy Wholesale Commodities Exit from the Merchant Power Business
” in the Form 10-K. For a discussion regarding the license renewals for Indian Point 2 and Indian Point 3, see “
Entergy Wholesale Commodities Authorizations to Operate Its Nuclear Power Plants
” above and in the Form 10-K.
(g)
Percent of planned qualified capacity sold to mitigate price uncertainty under physical or financial transactions.
(h)
A contract for the sale of installed capacity and related energy, priced per megawatt-hour sold.
(i)
A contract for the sale of an installed capacity product in a regional market.
(j)
Includes assumptions on converting a portion of the portfolio to contracted with fixed price cost or discount and excludes non-cash revenue from the amortization of the Palisades below-market purchased power agreement, mark-to-market activity, and service revenues.
Entergy estimates that a positive $10 per MWh change in the annual average energy price in the markets in which the Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear business sells power, based on
June 30, 2017
market conditions, planned generation volumes, and hedged positions, would have a corresponding effect on pre-tax net income of $19 million for the remainder of 2017. As of
June 30, 2016
, a positive $10 per MWh change would have had a corresponding effect on pre-tax income of $50 million for the remainder of 2016. A negative $10 per MWh change in the annual average energy price in the markets based on
June 30, 2017
market conditions, planned generation volumes, and hedged positions, would have a corresponding effect on pre-tax net income of ($17) million for the remainder of 2017. As of
June 30, 2016
, a negative $10 per MWh change would have had a corresponding effect on pre-tax income of ($32) million for the remainder of 2016.
Some of the agreements to sell the power produced by Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ power plants contain provisions that require an Entergy subsidiary to provide credit support to secure its obligations under the agreements. The Entergy subsidiary is required to provide credit support based upon the difference between the current market prices and contracted power prices in the regions where Entergy Wholesale Commodities sells power. The primary form of credit support to satisfy these requirements is an Entergy Corporation guaranty. Cash and letters of credit are also acceptable forms of credit support. At
June 30, 2017
, based on power prices at that time, Entergy had liquidity exposure of $116 million under the guarantees in place supporting Entergy Wholesale Commodities transactions and $8 million of posted cash collateral. In the event of a decrease in Entergy Corporation’s credit rating to below investment grade, based on power prices as of
June 30, 2017
, Entergy would have been required to provide approximately $50 million of additional cash or letters of credit under some of the agreements. As of
June 30, 2017
, the liquidity exposure associated with Entergy Wholesale Commodities assurance requirements, including return of previously posted collateral from counterparties, would increase by $236 million for a $1 per MMBtu increase in gas prices in both the short-and long-term markets.
As of
June 30, 2017
, substantially all of the credit exposure associated with the planned energy output under contract for Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear plants through 2021 is with counterparties or their guarantors that have public investment grade credit ratings.
Nuclear Matters
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –
Nuclear Matters
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of nuclear matters. The following is an update to that discussion.
19
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Indian Point
During the scheduled refueling and maintenance outage at Indian Point 2 in the first quarter 2016, comprehensive inspections were done as part of the aging management program that calls for an in-depth inspection of the reactor vessel. Inspections of more than 2,000 bolts in the reactor’s removable insert liner identified issues with roughly 11% of the bolts that required further analysis. Entergy replaced bolts as appropriate, and the unit returned to service in June 2016. In 2016, Entergy evaluated the scope and duration of Indian Point 3’s scheduled refueling outage planned for 2017, which began in March 2017. Based on the results of the 2016 evaluation and analysis, Entergy extended Indian Point 3’s planned 2017 outage duration. Entergy performed the same in-depth inspection of the reactor vessel at Indian Point 3 during Indian Point 3’s spring 2017 refueling and maintenance outage that it performed for Indian Point 2. Based on inspection data, Entergy replaced approximately the same number of bolts at Indian Point 3 that it replaced at Indian Point 2 before returning the plant to service in May 2017.
Critical Accounting Estimates
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
Critical Accounting Estimates
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the estimates and judgments necessary in Entergy’s accounting for nuclear decommissioning costs, utility regulatory accounting, unbilled revenue, impairment of long-lived assets and trust fund investments, taxation and uncertain tax positions, qualified pension and other postretirement benefits, and other contingencies.
New Accounting Pronouncements
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
New Accounting Pronouncements
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of new accounting pronouncements. Following are updates to that discussion.
As discussed in the Form 10-K, ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” is effective for Entergy for the first quarter 2018. Entergy has selected the modified retrospective transition method. Entergy’s evaluation of ASU 2014-09 has not identified any effects that it expects will affect materially its results of operations, financial position, or cash flows. Entergy continues to monitor the development and finalization of industry-specific application guidance that could have an effect on this assessment.
In March 2017 the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-07, “Compensation - Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost.” The ASU requires entities to report the service cost component of defined benefit pension cost and postretirement benefit cost (net benefit cost) in the same line item as other compensation costs arising from services rendered during the period. The other components of net benefit cost are required to be presented in the income statement separately from the service cost component and outside a subtotal of income from operations. In addition, the ASU allows only the service cost component of net benefit cost to be eligible for capitalization. ASU 2017-07 is effective for Entergy for the first quarter 2018. Entergy does not expect ASU 2017-07 to affect materially its results of operations, financial position, or cash flows.
20
Table of Contents
ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended
Six Months Ended
2017
2016
2017
2016
(In Thousands, Except Share Data)
OPERATING REVENUES
Electric
$2,271,220
$2,093,331
$4,262,960
$4,135,492
Natural gas
30,075
25,121
73,426
70,734
Competitive businesses
317,255
344,110
870,622
866,189
TOTAL
2,618,550
2,462,562
5,207,008
5,072,415
OPERATING EXPENSES
Operation and Maintenance:
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
395,947
381,465
813,513
886,432
Purchased power
416,497
242,672
774,264
504,996
Nuclear refueling outage expenses
38,288
47,045
80,853
98,276
Other operation and maintenance
820,297
759,258
1,687,845
1,491,174
Asset write-offs, impairments, and related charges
193,571
6,969
405,362
14,329
Decommissioning
100,296
76,625
214,669
145,253
Taxes other than income taxes
153,264
149,249
309,616
299,027
Depreciation and amortization
350,328
335,668
697,593
669,939
Other regulatory charges (credits)
6,553
21,353
(78,749
)
22,512
TOTAL
2,475,041
2,020,304
4,904,966
4,131,938
Gain on sale of assets
—
—
16,270
—
OPERATING INCOME
143,509
442,258
318,312
940,477
OTHER INCOME
Allowance for equity funds used during construction
22,376
13,860
41,384
32,792
Interest and investment income
80,097
46,375
136,646
79,128
Miscellaneous - net
(6,872
)
(8,377
)
(1,371
)
(18,963
)
TOTAL
95,601
51,858
176,659
92,957
INTEREST EXPENSE
Interest expense
173,377
177,631
344,466
351,442
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction
(10,523
)
(7,132
)
(19,565
)
(16,813
)
TOTAL
162,854
170,499
324,901
334,629
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES
76,256
323,617
170,070
698,805
Income taxes
(337,112
)
(248,973
)
(329,350
)
(109,027
)
CONSOLIDATED NET INCOME
413,368
572,590
499,420
807,832
Preferred dividend requirements of subsidiaries
3,446
5,276
6,892
10,552
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO ENTERGY CORPORATION
$409,922
$567,314
$492,528
$797,280
Earnings per average common share:
Basic
$2.28
$3.17
$2.75
$4.46
Diluted
$2.27
$3.16
$2.74
$4.45
Dividends declared per common share
$0.87
$0.85
$1.74
$1.70
Basic average number of common shares outstanding
179,475,346
178,808,149
179,405,592
178,693,342
Diluted average number of common shares outstanding
180,234,694
179,503,582
180,032,233
179,233,209
See Notes to Financial Statements.
21
Table of Contents
(page left blank intentionally)
22
Table of Contents
ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended
Six Months Ended
2017
2016
2017
2016
(In Thousands)
Net Income
$413,368
$572,590
$499,420
$807,832
Other comprehensive income (loss)
Cash flow hedges net unrealized gain (loss) (net of tax expense (benefit) of $10,684, ($34,576), $10,325, and ($39,777))
19,949
(64,041
)
19,421
(73,547
)
Pension and other postretirement liabilities (net of tax expense of $5,839, $2,779, $12,216, and $3,037)
10,916
5,043
19,548
12,605
Net unrealized investment gains (net of tax expense of $2,870, $19,515, $42,164, and $37,873)
11,696
20,955
49,523
44,024
Foreign currency translation (net of tax benefit of $403, $487, $403, and $640)
(748
)
(904
)
(748
)
(1,188
)
Other comprehensive income (loss)
41,813
(38,947
)
87,744
(18,106
)
Comprehensive Income
455,181
533,643
587,164
789,726
Preferred dividend requirements of subsidiaries
3,446
5,276
6,892
10,552
Comprehensive Income Attributable to Entergy Corporation
$451,735
$528,367
$580,272
$779,174
See Notes to Financial Statements.
23
Table of Contents
ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited)
2017
2016
(In Thousands)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Consolidated net income
$499,420
$807,832
Adjustments to reconcile consolidated net income to net cash flow provided by operating activities:
Depreciation, amortization, and decommissioning, including nuclear fuel amortization
1,042,671
1,012,753
Deferred income taxes, investment tax credits, and non-current taxes accrued
(324,227
)
(170,026
)
Asset write-offs, impairments, and related charges
220,828
14,329
Gain on sale of assets
(16,270
)
—
Changes in working capital:
Receivables
6,091
(57,673
)
Fuel inventory
6,213
9,586
Accounts payable
9,687
45,412
Taxes accrued
(2,202
)
7,056
Interest accrued
(3,947
)
(9,543
)
Deferred fuel costs
(127,945
)
3,757
Other working capital accounts
(91,505
)
(121,929
)
Changes in provisions for estimated losses
(7,340
)
1,533
Changes in other regulatory assets
62,612
109,700
Changes in other regulatory liabilities
(8,250
)
70,505
Changes in pensions and other postretirement liabilities
(180,346
)
(168,856
)
Other
(265,807
)
(302,356
)
Net cash flow provided by operating activities
819,683
1,252,080
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Construction/capital expenditures
(1,719,712
)
(1,294,498
)
Allowance for equity funds used during construction
41,877
33,152
Nuclear fuel purchases
(209,756
)
(124,107
)
Payment for purchase of plant
—
(947,903
)
Proceeds from sale of assets
100,000
—
Insurance proceeds received for property damages
26,157
—
Changes in securitization account
10,028
13,239
Payments to storm reserve escrow account
(1,124
)
(805
)
Receipts from storm reserve escrow account
8,836
—
Decreases in other investments
1,705
57
Litigation proceeds for reimbursement of spent nuclear fuel storage costs
25,493
89,407
Proceeds from nuclear decommissioning trust fund sales
1,462,698
1,232,672
Investment in nuclear decommissioning trust funds
(1,516,406
)
(1,267,452
)
Net cash flow used in investing activities
(1,770,204
)
(2,266,238
)
See Notes to Financial Statements.
24
Table of Contents
ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited)
2017
2016
(In Thousands)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from the issuance of:
Long-term debt
1,036,529
3,856,768
Treasury stock
7,819
16,855
Retirement of long-term debt
(866,337
)
(3,420,196
)
Changes in credit borrowings and commercial paper - net
833,957
530,540
Other
4,305
(10,276
)
Dividends paid:
Common stock
(312,209
)
(303,843
)
Preferred stock
(6,892
)
(10,552
)
Net cash flow provided by financing activities
697,172
659,296
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
(253,349
)
(354,862
)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
1,187,844
1,350,961
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$934,495
$996,099
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid (received) during the period for:
Interest - net of amount capitalized
$334,555
$410,744
Income taxes
($14,673
)
$84,607
See Notes to Financial Statements.
25
Table of Contents
ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016
(Unaudited)
2017
2016
(In Thousands)
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents:
Cash
$67,238
$129,579
Temporary cash investments
867,257
1,058,265
Total cash and cash equivalents
934,495
1,187,844
Accounts receivable:
Customer
579,674
654,995
Allowance for doubtful accounts
(12,947
)
(11,924
)
Other
138,285
158,419
Accrued unbilled revenues
415,424
368,677
Total accounts receivable
1,120,436
1,170,167
Deferred fuel costs
194,245
108,465
Fuel inventory - at average cost
173,387
179,600
Materials and supplies - at average cost
695,690
698,523
Deferred nuclear refueling outage costs
228,300
146,221
Prepayments and other
252,791
193,448
TOTAL
3,599,344
3,684,268
OTHER PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS
Investment in affiliates - at equity
198
198
Decommissioning trust funds
6,796,911
5,723,897
Non-utility property - at cost (less accumulated depreciation)
247,363
233,641
Other
453,705
469,664
TOTAL
7,498,177
6,427,400
PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT
Electric
45,916,902
45,191,216
Property under capital lease
618,731
619,527
Natural gas
426,674
413,224
Construction work in progress
1,741,867
1,378,180
Nuclear fuel
958,190
1,037,899
TOTAL PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT
49,662,364
48,640,046
Less - accumulated depreciation and amortization
21,095,139
20,718,639
PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT - NET
28,567,225
27,921,407
DEFERRED DEBITS AND OTHER ASSETS
Regulatory assets:
Regulatory asset for income taxes - net
769,364
761,280
Other regulatory assets (includes securitization property of $550,077 as of June 30, 2017 and $600,996 as of December 31, 2016)
4,699,217
4,769,913
Deferred fuel costs
239,199
239,100
Goodwill
377,172
377,172
Accumulated deferred income taxes
115,562
117,885
Other
141,777
1,606,009
TOTAL
6,342,291
7,871,359
TOTAL ASSETS
$46,007,037
$45,904,434
See Notes to Financial Statements.
26
Table of Contents
ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016
(Unaudited)
2017
2016
(In Thousands)
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Currently maturing long-term debt
$702,909
$364,900
Notes payable and commercial paper
1,248,969
415,011
Accounts payable
1,165,699
1,285,577
Customer deposits
401,089
403,311
Taxes accrued
178,912
181,114
Interest accrued
183,282
187,229
Deferred fuel costs
60,687
102,753
Obligations under capital leases
2,387
2,423
Pension and other postretirement liabilities
72,127
76,942
Other
224,469
180,836
TOTAL
4,240,530
3,200,096
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accumulated deferred income taxes and taxes accrued
7,246,612
7,495,290
Accumulated deferred investment tax credits
221,449
227,147
Obligations under capital leases
23,179
24,582
Other regulatory liabilities
1,564,679
1,572,929
Decommissioning and asset retirement cost liabilities
6,118,860
5,992,476
Accumulated provisions
474,020
481,636
Pension and other postretirement liabilities
2,860,479
3,036,010
Long-term debt (includes securitization bonds of $601,861 as of June 30, 2017 and $661,175 as of December 31, 2016)
14,307,759
14,467,655
Other
375,429
1,121,619
TOTAL
33,192,466
34,419,344
Commitments and Contingencies
Subsidiaries' preferred stock without sinking fund
203,185
203,185
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Common stock, $.01 par value, authorized 500,000,000 shares; issued 254,752,788 shares in 2017 and in 2016
2,548
2,548
Paid-in capital
5,409,862
5,417,245
Retained earnings
8,375,890
8,195,571
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
52,773
(34,971
)
Less - treasury stock, at cost (75,233,350 shares in 2017 and 75,623,363 shares in 2016)
5,470,217
5,498,584
TOTAL
8,370,856
8,081,809
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
$46,007,037
$45,904,434
See Notes to Financial Statements.
27
Table of Contents
ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited)
Common Shareholders’ Equity
Subsidiaries’ Preferred Stock
Common
Stock
Treasury
Stock
Paid-in
Capital
Retained Earnings
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Total
(In Thousands)
Balance at December 31, 2015
$—
$2,548
($5,552,379
)
$5,403,758
$9,393,913
$8,951
$9,256,791
Consolidated net income (a)
10,552
—
—
—
797,280
—
807,832
Other comprehensive loss
—
—
—
—
—
(18,106
)
(18,106
)
Common stock issuances related to stock plans
—
—
36,877
(11,212
)
—
—
25,665
Common stock dividends declared
—
—
—
—
(303,843
)
—
(303,843
)
Preferred dividend requirements of subsidiaries (a)
(10,552
)
—
—
—
—
—
(10,552
)
Balance at June 30, 2016
$—
$2,548
($5,515,502
)
$5,392,546
$9,887,350
($9,155
)
$9,757,787
Balance at December 31, 2016
$—
$2,548
($5,498,584
)
$5,417,245
$8,195,571
($34,971
)
$8,081,809
Consolidated net income (a)
6,892
—
—
—
492,528
—
499,420
Other comprehensive income
—
—
—
—
—
87,744
87,744
Common stock issuances related to stock plans
—
—
28,367
(7,383
)
—
—
20,984
Common stock dividends declared
—
—
—
—
(312,209
)
—
(312,209
)
Preferred dividend requirements of subsidiaries (a)
(6,892
)
—
—
—
—
—
(6,892
)
Balance at June 30, 2017
$—
$2,548
($5,470,217
)
$5,409,862
$8,375,890
$52,773
$8,370,856
See Notes to Financial Statements.
(a) Consolidated net income and preferred dividend requirements of subsidiaries for 2017 and 2016 include $6.9 million and $10.6 million, respectively, of preferred dividends on subsidiaries’ preferred stock without sinking fund that is not presented within equity.
28
Table of Contents
ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
SELECTED OPERATING RESULTS
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended
Increase/
Description
2017
2016
(Decrease)
%
(Dollars in Millions)
Utility electric operating revenues:
Residential
$748
$667
$81
12
Commercial
604
543
61
11
Industrial
651
551
100
18
Governmental
57
52
5
10
Total retail
2,060
1,813
247
14
Sales for resale
46
72
(26
)
(36
)
Other
165
208
(43
)
(21
)
Total
$2,271
$2,093
$178
9
Utility billed electric energy sales (GWh):
Residential
7,340
7,081
259
4
Commercial
6,886
6,777
109
2
Industrial
12,209
11,509
700
6
Governmental
609
609
—
—
Total retail
27,044
25,976
1,068
4
Sales for resale
1,845
3,579
(1,734
)
(48
)
Total
28,889
29,555
(666
)
(2
)
Entergy Wholesale Commodities:
Operating Revenues
$317
$344
($27
)
(8
)
Billed Electric Energy Sales (GWh)
6,019
7,866
(1,847
)
(23
)
Six Months Ended
Increase/
Description
2017
2016
(Decrease)
%
(Dollars in Millions)
Utility electric operating revenues:
Residential
$1,453
$1,411
$42
3
Commercial
1,140
1,081
59
5
Industrial
1,216
1,111
105
9
Governmental
110
103
7
7
Total retail
3,919
3,706
213
6
Sales for resale
124
127
(3
)
(2
)
Other
220
302
(82
)
(27
)
Total
$4,263
$4,135
$128
3
Utility billed electric energy sales (GWh):
Residential
14,977
15,218
(241
)
(2
)
Commercial
13,325
13,288
37
—
Industrial
23,326
22,564
762
3
Governmental
1,202
1,209
(7
)
(1
)
Total retail
52,830
52,279
551
1
Sales for resale
4,867
6,719
(1,852
)
(28
)
Total
57,697
58,998
(1,301
)
(2
)
Entergy Wholesale Commodities:
Operating revenues
$871
$866
$5
1
Billed electric energy sales (GWh)
14,382
17,112
(2,730
)
(16
)
29
Table of Contents
ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTE 1. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy)
Entergy and the Registrant Subsidiaries are involved in a number of legal, regulatory, and tax proceedings before various courts, regulatory commissions, and governmental agencies in the ordinary course of business. While management is unable to predict with certainty the outcome of such proceedings, management does not believe that the ultimate resolution of these matters will have a material adverse effect on Entergy’s results of operations, cash flows, or financial condition, except as otherwise discussed in the Form 10-K or in this report. Entergy discusses regulatory proceedings in Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K and herein and discusses tax proceedings in Note 3 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K and Note 10 to the financial statements herein.
Vidalia Purchased Power Agreement
See Note 8 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for information on Entergy Louisiana’s Vidalia purchased power agreement.
ANO Damage, Outage, and NRC Reviews
See Note 8 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the ANO stator incident, subsequent NRC reviews, and the deferral of replacement power costs.
Pilgrim NRC Oversight and Planned Shutdown
See Note 8 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the NRC’s enhanced inspections of Pilgrim and Entergy’s planned shutdown of Pilgrim no later than June 1, 2019.
Spent Nuclear Fuel Litigation
See Note 8 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for information on Entergy’s spent nuclear fuel litigation.
As discussed in the Form 10-K, in April 2016 the U.S. Court of Federal Claims issued a partial judgment in the amount of
$42 million
in favor of Entergy Louisiana and against the DOE in the first round River Bend damages case, reserving the issue of cask loading costs pending resolution of the appeal on the same issues in the Entergy Arkansas and System Energy cases. Entergy Louisiana received payment from the U.S. Treasury in August 2016. In September 2016 the U.S. Court of Federal Claims issued a further judgment in the River Bend case in the amount of
$5 million
. Entergy Louisiana received payment from the U.S. Treasury in January 2017.
As discussed in the Form 10-K, in September 2016 the U.S. Court of Federal Claims issued a judgment in the Entergy Nuclear Palisades case in the amount of
$14 million
, including
$11 million
related to costs previously capitalized and
$3 million
related to costs previously recorded as other operation and maintenance expense. Entergy Nuclear Palisades recorded a receivable for that amount, and subsequently received payment from the U.S. Treasury in January 2017.
As discussed in the Form 10-K, in October 2016 the U.S. Court of Federal Claims issued a judgment in the second round Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 2 case in the amount of
$34 million
, including
$14 million
related to costs previously capitalized,
$15 million
related to costs previously recorded as other operation and maintenance expense,
$3 million
related to previously recorded decommissioning expense, and
$2 million
related to costs previously recorded
30
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
as taxes other than income taxes. Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 2 recorded a receivable for that amount, and subsequently received payment from the U.S. Treasury in January 2017.
Nuclear Insurance
See Note 8 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for information on nuclear liability and property insurance associated with Entergy’s nuclear power plants.
Conventional Property Insurance
See Note 8 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for information on Entergy’s non-nuclear property insurance program.
Employment and Labor-related Proceedings
See Note 8 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for information on Entergy’s employment and labor-related proceedings.
Asbestos Litigation
(Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy New Orleans, and Entergy Texas)
See Note 8 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for information regarding asbestos litigation.
NOTE 2. RATE AND REGULATORY MATTERS
(Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy)
Regulatory Assets and Regulatory Liabilities
See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for information regarding regulatory assets and regulatory liabilities in the Utility business presented on the balance sheets of Entergy and the Registrant Subsidiaries. The following are updates to that discussion.
Fuel and purchased power cost recovery
Entergy Arkansas
Energy Cost Recovery Rider
In March 2017, Entergy Arkansas filed its annual redetermination of its energy cost rate pursuant to the energy cost recovery rider, which reflected an increase in the rate from
$0.01164
per kWh to
$0.01547
per kWh. The APSC staff filed testimony in March 2017 recommending that the redetermined rate should be implemented with the first billing cycle of April 2017 under the normal operation of the tariff. Accordingly, the redetermined rate went into effect on March 31, 2017 pursuant to the tariff. In July 2017 the Arkansas Attorney General requested additional information to support certain of the costs included in Entergy Arkansas’s 2017 energy cost rate redetermination.
Entergy Louisiana
As discussed in the Form 10-K, in June 2016 the LPSC staff provided notice of audits of Entergy Louisiana’s fuel adjustment clause filings and purchased gas adjustment clause filings. Discovery commenced in March 2017.
31
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
Entergy Mississippi
Mississippi Attorney General Complaint
As discussed in the Form 10-K, the Mississippi attorney general filed a complaint in state court in December 2008 against Entergy Corporation, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy Services, and Entergy Power. The defendants have denied the allegations. In June 2017 the District Court issued a case management order setting a trial date in November 2018. Discovery is currently in progress.
Entergy Texas
As discussed in the Form 10-K, in July 2016, Entergy Texas filed an application to reconcile its fuel and purchased power costs for the period April 1, 2013 through March 31, 2016. In December 2016, Entergy Texas entered into a stipulation and settlement agreement resulting in a
$6 million
disallowance not associated with any particular issue raised and a refund of the over-recovery balance of
$21 million
as of November 30, 2016, to most customers beginning April 2017 through June 2017. The fuel reconciliation settlement was approved by the PUCT in March 2017 and the refunds were made.
In June 2017, Entergy Texas filed an application for a fuel refund of approximately
$30.7 million
for the months of December 2016 through April 2017. For most customers, the refunds will flow through bills for the months of July 2017 through September 2017. Also in June 2017, the PUCT’s administrative law judge approved the refund on an interim basis. A final decision in this matter remains pending.
Retail Rate Proceedings
See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for detailed information regarding retail rate proceedings involving the Utility operating companies. The following are updates to that information.
Filings with the APSC
2016 Formula Rate Plan Filing
As discussed in the Form 10-K, Entergy Arkansas is required to make a supplemental filing supporting the recovery of certain nuclear costs. In April 2017, Entergy Arkansas filed a motion consented to by all parties requesting that it be permitted to submit its supplemental filing in conjunction with its 2017 formula rate plan filing, which was subsequently made in July 2017 and is discussed below. In May 2017 the APSC approved the joint motion and proposal to review Entergy Arkansas’s supplemental filing on a concurrent schedule with the 2017 formula rate plan filing. In doing so, however, the APSC noted that a determination of whether the supplemental information supporting certain nuclear expenditures will be considered in the hearing for the 2017 formula rate plan filing or a separate hearing will be made at a later time.
2017 Formula Rate Plan Filing
In July 2017, Entergy Arkansas filed with the APSC its 2017 formula rate plan filing showing Entergy Arkansas’s projected earned return on common equity for the twelve months ended December 31, 2018 test period to be below the formula rate plan bandwidth. The filing projected a
$129.7 million
revenue requirement increase to achieve Entergy Arkansas’s target earned return on common equity of
9.75%
. Because the projected revenue increase exceeds the
four
percent annual revenue constraint for each rate class, however, Entergy Arkansas proposed a
$70.9 million
revenue requirement increase. Entergy Arkansas requested an order approving its proposed formula rate plan adjustment by December 13, 2017. If a final order is not issued by this date, the proposed formula rate plan adjustment will become effective January 2, 2018, subject to refund.
32
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) Filing
As discussed in the Form 10-K, in September 2016, Entergy Arkansas filed an application seeking a finding from the APSC that Entergy Arkansas’s deployment of advanced metering infrastructure is in the public interest. In June 2017 the APSC staff and Arkansas Attorney General filed direct testimony. The APSC staff generally supported Entergy Arkansas’s AMI deployment conditioned on various recommendations. The Arkansas Attorney General’s consultant primarily recommended denial of Entergy Arkansas’s application but alternatively suggested recommendations in the event the APSC approves Entergy Arkansas’s proposal. Entergy Arkansas filed rebuttal testimony in June 2017, substantially accepting the APSC staff’s recommendations. In August 2017, Entergy Arkansas and the parties to the proceeding filed a joint motion to suspend the procedural schedule pending the filing with the APSC of an agreement in principle on all issues.
Filings with the LPSC
Retail Rates - Electric
2014 Formula Rate Plan Filing
As discussed in the Form 10-K, in September 2015, Entergy Louisiana filed its formula rate plan evaluation report for Entergy Gulf States Louisiana’s and Entergy Louisiana’s 2014 calendar year operations. In June 2017 the LPSC staff and Entergy Louisiana filed an unopposed joint report of proceedings, which was accepted by the LPSC in June 2017, finalizing the results of this proceeding with no changes to rates already implemented.
2015 Formula Rate Plan Filing
As discussed in the Form 10-K, in May 2016, Entergy Louisiana filed its formula rate plan evaluation report for its 2015 calendar year operations. In June 2017 the LPSC staff and Entergy Louisiana filed a joint report of proceedings, which was accepted by the LPSC in June 2017, finalizing the results of the May 2016 evaluation report, interim updates, and corresponding proceedings with no changes to rates already implemented.
Also, in November 2016, Entergy Louisiana filed with the LPSC a request to extend the MISO cost recovery mechanism rider provision of its formula rate plan. In March 2017 the LPSC staff submitted direct testimony generally supportive of a one-year extension of the MISO cost recovery mechanism and the intervenor in the proceeding does not oppose an extension for this period of time. In June 2017 an uncontested joint stipulation authorizing a one-year extension of the MISO cost recovery mechanism rider was filed and the LPSC approved the stipulation in July 2017.
2016 Formula Rate Plan Filing
In May 2017, Entergy Louisiana filed its formula rate plan evaluation report for its 2016 calendar year operations. The evaluation report reflects an earned return on common equity of
9.84%
. As such, no adjustment to base formula rate plan revenue is required. The following adjustments, however, are required under the formula rate plan: The 2016 formula rate plan evaluation report shows a decrease in formula rate plan revenue of approximately
$16.9 million
, comprised of a decrease in legacy Entergy Louisiana formula rate plan revenue of
$3.5 million
, a decrease in legacy Entergy Gulf States Louisiana formula rate plan revenue of
$9.7 million
, and a decrease in incremental formula rate plan revenue of
$3.6 million
. Additionally, the formula rate plan evaluation report calls for a decrease in the MISO cost recovery revenue requirement of
$40.5 million
, from the present level of
$46.8 million
to
$6.3 million
. Rates reflecting these adjustments will be implemented with the first billing cycle of September 2017, subject to refund, pending the review proceedings. Parties have intervened in the proceedings. No procedural schedule has been established.
33
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
Waterford 3 Replacement Steam Generator Project
See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of the Waterford 3 replacement steam generator project prudence review proceeding. The refund to customers of approximately
$71 million
as a result of the settlement approved by the LPSC was made to customers in January 2017. Following a review by the parties, an unopposed joint report of proceedings was filed by the LPSC staff and Entergy Louisiana in May 2017. In May 2017 the LPSC accepted the joint report of proceedings resolving the matter.
Union Power Station
As a term of the LPSC-approved settlement authorizing the purchase of Power Blocks 3 and 4 of the Union Power Station, Entergy Louisiana agreed to make a filing with the LPSC to review its decisions to deactivate Ninemile 3 and Willow Glen 2 and 4 and its decision to retire Little Gypsy 1. In January 2016, Entergy Louisiana made its compliance filing with the LPSC. Entergy Louisiana, LPSC staff, and intervenors participated in a technical conference in March 2016 where Entergy Louisiana presented information on its deactivation/retirement decisions for these four units in addition to information on the current deactivation decisions for the ten-year planning horizon. Parties have requested further proceedings on the prudence of the decision to deactivate Willow Glen 2 and 4. No party contests the prudence of the decision to deactivate Willow Glen 2 and 4 or suggests reactivation of these units; however, issues have been raised related to Entergy Louisiana’s decision to give up its transmission service rights in MISO for Willow Glen 2 and 4 rather than placing the units into suspended status for the three year term permitted by MISO. This matter is pending before an ALJ, with an evidentiary hearing scheduled in August 2017.
Retail Rates - Gas
2016 Rate Stabilization Plan Filing
In January 2017, Entergy Louisiana filed with the LPSC its gas rate stabilization plan for the test year ended September 30, 2016. The filing of the evaluation report for test year 2016 reflected an earned return on common equity of
6.37%
. As part of the original filing, pursuant to the extraordinary cost provision of the rate stabilization plan, Entergy Louisiana sought to recover approximately
$1.5 million
in deferred operation and maintenance expenses incurred to restore service and repair damage resulting from flooding and widespread rainfall in southeast Louisiana that occurred in August 2016. Entergy Louisiana requested to recover the prudently incurred August 2016 storm restoration costs over ten years, outside of the rate stabilization plan sharing provisions. As a result, Entergy Louisiana’s filing sought an annual increase in revenue of
$1.4 million
. Following review of the filing, except for the proposed extraordinary cost recovery, the LPSC staff confirmed Entergy Louisiana’s filing was consistent with the principles and requirements of the rate stabilization plan. The extraordinary cost recovery request associated with the 2016 flood-related deferred operation and maintenance expenses incurred for gas operations was removed from the rate stabilization plan pending LPSC consideration in a separate docket. In April 2017 the LPSC approved a joint report of proceedings and Entergy Louisiana submitted a revised evaluation report reflecting a
$1.2 million
annual increase in revenue with rates implemented with the first billing cycle of May 2017.
In connection with the joint report of proceedings accepted by the LPSC, in May 2017, Entergy Louisiana filed an application to initiate a separate proceeding to recover the deferred operation and maintenance expenses incurred to restore service and repair damage resulting from flooding and widespread rainfall in southeast Louisiana that occurred in August 2016 through the extraordinary cost provision of the gas rate stabilization plan. A procedural schedule has been established, with a hearing in November 2017.
Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) Filing
As discussed in the Form 10-K, in November 2016, Entergy Louisiana filed an application seeking a finding from the LPSC that Entergy Louisiana’s deployment of advanced electric and gas metering infrastructure is in the public interest. The parties reached an uncontested stipulation permitting implementation of Entergy Louisiana’s
34
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
proposed AMI system, with modifications to the proposed customer charge. In July 2017 the LPSC approved the stipulation.
Filings with the MPSC
Formula Rate Plan
In March 2017, Entergy Mississippi submitted its formula rate plan 2017 test year filing and 2016 look-back filing showing Entergy Mississippi’s earned return for the historical 2016 calendar year and projected earned return for the 2017 calendar year to be within the formula rate plan bandwidth, resulting in no change in rates. In June 2017, Entergy Mississippi and the Mississippi Public Utilities Staff entered into a stipulation that confirmed that Entergy Mississippi’s earned returns for both the 2016 look-back filing and 2017 test year were within the respective formula rate plan bandwidths. In June 2017 the MPSC approved the stipulation, which resulted in no change in rates.
Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) Filing
As discussed in the Form 10-K, in November 2016, Entergy Mississippi filed an application seeking a finding from the MPSC that Entergy Mississippi’s deployment of advanced metering infrastructure is in the public interest. In May 2017 the Mississippi Public Utilities Staff and Entergy Mississippi entered into and filed a joint stipulation supporting Entergy Mississippi’s filing, and the MPSC issued an order approving the filing without any material changes, finding that Entergy Mississippi’s deployment of AMI is in the public interest and granting a certificate of public convenience and necessity. The MPSC order also confirmed that Entergy Mississippi shall continue to include in rate base the remaining book value of existing meters that will be retired as part of the AMI deployment and also to depreciate those assets using current depreciation rates.
Filings with the City Council
Retail Rates
As discussed in the Form 10-K, in February 2017, Entergy New Orleans filed a proposed implementation plan for the Energy Smart program from April 2017 through March 2020. As part of the proposal, Entergy New Orleans requested that the City Council identify its desired level of funding for the program during this time period and approve a cost recovery mechanism. In April 2017 the City Council approved an implementation plan for the Energy Smart program from April 2017 through December 2019. The City Council directed that the
$11.8 million
balance reported for Energy Smart funds be used to continue funding the program for Entergy New Orleans’s legacy customers and that the Energy Smart Algiers program continue to be funded through the Algiers fuel adjustment clause, until additional customer funding is required for the legacy customers. The City Council ordered Entergy New Orleans to submit a supplemental and amended implementation plan for program years 8 and 9 of the Energy Smart program (January 2018 through December 2019) in October 2017. Following that filing, the City Council will determine a specific cost recovery mechanism for the program for both legacy and Algiers customers. The City Council will not permit Entergy New Orleans to recover lost contribution to fixed costs for program years 7, 8, or 9 of the Energy Smart program.
Internal Restructuring
As discussed in the Form 10-K, in July 2016, Entergy New Orleans filed an application with the City Council seeking authorization to undertake a restructuring that would result in the transfer of substantially all of the assets and operations of Entergy New Orleans to a new entity, which would ultimately be owned by an existing Entergy subsidiary holding company. In May 2017 the City Council adopted a resolution approving the proposed internal restructuring pursuant to an agreement in principle with the City Council advisors and certain intervenors. Pursuant to the agreement in principle, Entergy New Orleans will credit retail customers
$10 million
in 2017,
$1.4 million
in the first quarter of the year after the transaction closes, and
$117,500
each month in the second year after the transaction closes until such time as new base rates go into effect as a result of the anticipated 2018 base rate case. Entergy New Orleans began
35
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
crediting retail customers in June 2017. Also pursuant to the agreement in principle, if FERC approval is received prior to December 31, 2018, Entergy New Orleans will provide additional credits to retail customers of
$5 million
in each of the years 2018, 2019, and 2020.
Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) Filing
As discussed in the Form 10-K, in October 2016, Entergy New Orleans filed an application seeking a finding from the City Council that Entergy New Orleans’s deployment of advanced electric and gas metering infrastructure is in the public interest. In April 2017, Entergy New Orleans received intervenor testimony that was generally supportive of AMI deployment. The City Council’s advisors filed testimony in May 2017 recommending the adoption of AMI subject to certain modifications, including the denial of Entergy New Orleans’s proposed customer charge as a cost recovery mechanism. In June 2017 the procedural schedule was suspended to allow for settlement discussions. A settlement status conference is scheduled for August 2017.
Filings with the PUCT
Other Filings
In September 2016, Entergy Texas filed with the PUCT a request to amend its transmission cost recovery factor (TCRF) rider. The proposed amended TCRF rider is designed to collect approximately
$29.5 million
annually from Entergy Texas’s retail customers. This amount includes the approximately
$10.5 million
annually that Entergy Texas is currently authorized to collect through the TCRF rider. In September 2016 the PUCT suspended the effective date of the tariff change to March 2017. In December 2016, Entergy Texas and the PUCT reached a settlement agreeing to the amended TCRF annual revenue requirement of
$29.5 million
. The PUCT approved the settlement and issued a final order in March 2017. Entergy Texas implemented the amended TCRF rider beginning with bills covering usage on and after March 20, 2017.
In June 2017, Entergy Texas filed an application to amend its distribution cost recovery factor (DCRF) rider by increasing the total collection from
$8.65 million
to approximately
$19 million
. In July 2017, Entergy Texas, the PUCT, and the two other parties in the proceeding entered into an unopposed stipulation and settlement agreement resulting in an amended DCRF annual revenue requirement of
$18.3 million
, with the resulting rates effective for usage no later than October 1, 2017. PUCT action on the stipulation and settlement agreement remains pending.
Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) Filing
In its most recent regular session, the Texas legislature enacted legislation that extends statutory support for AMI deployment to Entergy Texas and directs that if Entergy Texas elects to deploy AMI, it shall do so as rapidly as practicable. In July 2017, Entergy Texas filed an application seeking an order from the PUCT approving Entergy Texas’s deployment of AMI. Entergy Texas proposed to replace existing meters with advanced meters that enable two-way data communication; design and build a secure and reliable network to support such communications; and implement support systems. AMI is intended to serve as the foundation of Entergy Texas’s modernized power grid. The filing identified a number of quantified and unquantified benefits, with Entergy Texas showing that its AMI deployment is expected to produce nominal net operational cost savings to customers of
$33 million
. Entergy Texas also sought to continue to include in rate base the remaining book value, approximately
$41 million
at December 31, 2016, of existing meters that will be retired as part of the AMI deployment and also to depreciate those assets using current depreciation rates. Entergy Texas proposed a seven-year depreciable life for the new advanced meters, the three-year deployment of which is expected to begin in 2019. Entergy Texas also proposed a surcharge tariff to recover the reasonable and necessary costs it has and will incur under the deployment plan for the full deployment of advanced meters. Further, Entergy Texas is seeking approval of fees that would be charged to customers who choose to opt out of receiving service through an advanced meter and instead receive electric service with a non-standard meter. Subject to approval by the PUCT, deployment of the communications network is expected to begin in 2018. Entergy Texas expects a decision from the PUCT by December 2017.
36
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
System Agreement Cost Equalization Proceedings
See the Form 10-K for a discussion of the litigation involving the System Agreement at the FERC and in federal courts.
Entergy Arkansas Opportunity Sales Proceedings
As discussed in the Form 10-K, in June 2009 the LPSC filed a complaint requesting that the FERC determine that certain of Entergy Arkansas’s sales of electric energy to third parties: (a) violated the provisions of the System Agreement that allocated the energy generated by Entergy System resources, (b) imprudently denied the Entergy System and its ultimate consumers the benefits of low-cost Entergy System generating capacity, and (c) violated the provision of the System Agreement that prohibited sales to third parties by individual companies absent an offer of a right-of-first-refusal to other Utility operating companies. The LPSC’s complaint challenges sales made beginning in 2002 and requests refunds.
In April 2016 the FERC issued orders addressing requests for rehearing filed in July 2012 and an ALJ’s August 2013 initial decision. The first order denies Entergy’s request for rehearing and affirms FERC’s earlier rulings that Entergy’s original methodology for allocating energy costs to the opportunity sales was incorrect and, as a result, Entergy Arkansas must make payments to the other Utility operating companies to put them in the same position that they would have been in absent the incorrect allocation. The FERC clarified that interest should be included with the payments. The second order affirmed in part, and reversed in part, the rulings in the ALJ’s August 2013 initial decision regarding the methodology that should be used to calculate the payments Entergy Arkansas is to make to the other Utility operating companies. The FERC affirmed the ALJ’s ruling that a full re-run of intra-system bills should be performed, but required that methodology be modified so that the sales have the same priority for purposes of energy allocation as joint account sales. The FERC reversed the ALJ’s decision that any payments by Entergy Arkansas should be reduced by
20%
. The FERC also reversed the ALJ’s decision that adjustments to other System Agreement service schedules and excess bandwidth payments should not be taken into account when calculating the payments to be made by Entergy Arkansas. The FERC held that such adjustments and excess bandwidth payments should be taken into account, but ordered further proceedings before an ALJ to address whether a cap on any reduction due to bandwidth payments was necessary and to implement the other adjustments to the calculation methodology.
In May 2016, Entergy Services filed a request for rehearing of the FERC’s April 2016 order addressing the requests for rehearing filed in July 2012. Entergy Services also filed a request for clarification and/or rehearing of the FERC’s April 2016 order addressing the ALJ’s August 2013 initial decision. The APSC and the LPSC also filed requests for rehearing of the FERC’s April 2016 order. The rehearing and clarification requests filed in May 2016 are pending FERC action.
Pursuant to the procedural schedule established in the case, Entergy Services re-ran intra-system bills for the ten-year period 2000-2009 to quantify the effects of the FERC's ruling. In November 2016 the LPSC submitted testimony disputing certain aspects of the calculations, and Entergy Services submitted answering testimony in January 2017. In February 2017 the FERC staff filed testimony and Entergy Services filed responsive testimony. In March 2017 the LPSC filed rebuttal testimony. A hearing was held in May 2017. In July 2017, the ALJ issued an initial decision concluding that Entergy Arkansas should pay
$86 million
plus interest to the other Utility operating companies. The Utility operating companies have the opportunity to challenge the ALJ’s initial decision by filing a brief on exceptions with the FERC. No payments will be made or received by the Utility operating companies until the FERC issues an order reviewing the initial decision and Entergy submits a subsequent filing to comply with that order.
The effect of the FERC’s decisions thus far in the case would be that Entergy Arkansas will make payments to some or all of the other Utility operating companies. Because further proceedings will still occur in the case, the amount and recipients of payments by Entergy Arkansas are unknown at this time. Based on testimony previously submitted in the case and its assessment of the April 2016 FERC orders, in the first quarter 2016, Entergy Arkansas recorded a liability of
$87 million
, which includes interest, for its estimated increased costs and payment to the other
37
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
Utility operating companies. This estimate is subject to change depending on how the FERC resolves the issues that are still outstanding in the case, including its review of the July 2017 initial decision. Entergy Arkansas’s increased costs will be attributed to Entergy Arkansas’s retail and wholesale businesses, and it is not probable that Entergy Arkansas will recover the wholesale portion. Entergy Arkansas, therefore, recorded a regulatory asset in the first quarter 2016 of approximately
$75 million
, which represents its estimate of the retail portion of the costs.
Complaint Against System Energy
In January 2017 the APSC and MPSC filed a complaint with the FERC against System Energy. The complaint seeks a reduction in the return on equity component of the Unit Power Sales Agreement pursuant to which System Energy sells its Grand Gulf capacity and energy to Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, and Entergy New Orleans. Entergy Arkansas also sells some of its Grand Gulf capacity and energy to Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, and Entergy New Orleans under separate agreements. The current return on equity under the Unit Power Sales Agreement is
10.94%
. The complaint alleges that the return on equity is unjust and unreasonable because current capital market and other considerations indicate that it is excessive. The complaint requests the FERC to institute proceedings to investigate the return on equity and establish a lower return on equity, and also requests that the FERC establish January 23, 2017 as a refund effective date. The complaint includes return on equity analysis that purports to establish that the range of reasonable return on equity for System Energy is between
8.37%
and
8.67%
. System Energy answered the complaint in February 2017 and disputes that a return on equity of 8.37% to 8.67% is just and reasonable. The LPSC and the City Council intervened in the proceeding expressing support for the complaint. System Energy is recording a provision against revenue for the potential outcome of this proceeding. Action by the FERC is pending.
Unit Power Sales Agreement
In August 2017, System Energy submitted to the FERC proposed amendments to the Unit Power Sales Agreement pursuant to which System Energy sells its Grand Gulf capacity and energy to Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, and Entergy New Orleans. The filing proposes limited amendments to the Unit Power Sales Agreement to adopt (1) updated rates for use in calculating Grand Gulf plant depreciation and amortization expenses and (2) updated nuclear decommissioning cost annual revenue requirements, both of which are recovered through the Unit Power Sales Agreement rate formula. The proposed amendments would result in lower charges to the Utility operating companies that buy capacity and energy from System Energy under the Unit Power Sales Agreement. The proposed changes are based on updated depreciation and nuclear decommissioning studies that take into account the renewal of Grand Gulf’s operating license for a term through November 1, 2044. System Energy requested that the FERC accept the amendments effective October 1, 2017. Action by the FERC is pending.
38
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
NOTE 3. EQUITY (Entergy Corporation and Entergy Louisiana)
Common Stock
Earnings per Share
The following table presents Entergy’s basic and diluted earnings per share calculations included on the consolidated income statements:
For the Three Months Ended June 30,
2017
2016
(In Millions, Except Per Share Data)
Basic earnings per share
Income
Shares
$/share
Income
Shares
$/share
Net income attributable to Entergy Corporation
$409.9
179.5
$2.28
$567.3
178.8
$3.17
Average dilutive effect of:
Stock options
0.2
—
0.2
—
Other equity plans
0.5
(0.01
)
0.5
(0.01
)
Diluted earnings per share
$409.9
180.2
$2.27
$567.3
179.5
$3.16
The number of stock options not included in the calculation of diluted common shares outstanding due to their antidilutive effect was approximately
2.5 million
for the
three months ended June 30, 2017
and approximately
4.1 million
for the
three months ended June 30, 2016
.
For the Six Months Ended June 30,
2017
2016
(In Millions, Except Per Share Data)
Basic earnings per share
Income
Shares
$/share
Income
Shares
$/share
Net income attributable to Entergy Corporation
$492.5
179.4
$2.75
$797.3
178.7
$4.46
Average dilutive effect of:
Stock options
0.2
—
0.1
—
Other equity plans
0.4
(0.01
)
0.4
(0.01
)
Diluted earnings per share
$492.5
180.0
$2.74
$797.3
179.2
$4.45
The number of stock options not included in the calculation of diluted common shares outstanding due to their antidilutive effect was approximately
3.7 million
for the
six months ended June 30, 2017
and approximately
5.1 million
for the
six months ended June 30, 2016
.
Entergy’s stock options and other equity compensation plans are discussed in Note 5 to the financial statements herein and in Note 12 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K.
Treasury Stock
During the
six months ended June 30, 2017
, Entergy Corporation issued
390,013
shares of its previously repurchased common stock to satisfy stock option exercises, vesting of shares of restricted stock, and other stock-based awards. Entergy Corporation did not repurchase any of its common stock during the
six months ended June 30, 2017
.
Retained Earnings
On July 28, 2017, Entergy Corporation’s Board of Directors declared a common stock dividend of
$0.87
per share, payable on September 1, 2017, to holders of record as of August 10, 2017.
39
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
Comprehensive Income
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) is included in the equity section of the balance sheets of Entergy and Entergy Louisiana. The following table presents changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for Entergy for the
three months ended June 30, 2017
by component:
Cash flow
hedges
net
unrealized
gain (loss)
Pension
and
other
postretirement
liabilities
Net
unrealized
investment
gain (loss)
Foreign
currency
translation
Total
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
(In Thousands)
Beginning balance, April 1, 2017
$3,465
($460,814
)
$467,561
$748
$10,960
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications
28,057
—
33,870
(748
)
61,179
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
(8,108
)
10,916
(22,174
)
—
(19,366
)
Net other comprehensive income (loss) for the period
19,949
10,916
11,696
(748
)
41,813
Ending balance, June 30, 2017
$23,414
($449,898
)
$479,257
$—
$52,773
The following table presents changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for Entergy for the
three months ended June 30, 2016
by component:
Cash flow
hedges
net
unrealized
gain (loss)
Pension
and
other
postretirement
liabilities
Net
unrealized
investment
gain (loss)
Foreign
currency
translation
Total
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
(In Thousands)
Beginning balance, April 1, 2016
$96,464
($459,042
)
$390,626
$1,744
$29,792
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications
(34,138
)
—
24,016
(904
)
(11,026
)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
(29,903
)
5,043
(3,061
)
—
(27,921
)
Net other comprehensive income (loss) for the period
(64,041
)
5,043
20,955
(904
)
(38,947
)
Ending balance, June 30, 2016
$32,423
($453,999
)
$411,581
$840
($9,155
)
40
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
The following table presents changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for Entergy for the
six months ended June 30, 2017
by component:
Cash flow
hedges
net
unrealized
gain (loss)
Pension
and
other
postretirement
liabilities
Net
unrealized
investment
gain (loss)
Foreign
currency
translation
Total
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
(In Thousands)
Beginning balance, January 1, 2017
$3,993
($469,446
)
$429,734
$748
($34,971
)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications
60,665
—
73,742
(748
)
133,659
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
(41,244
)
19,548
(24,219
)
—
(45,915
)
Net other comprehensive income (loss) for the period
19,421
19,548
49,523
(748
)
87,744
Ending balance, June 30, 2017
$23,414
($449,898
)
$479,257
$—
$52,773
The following table presents changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for Entergy for the
six months ended June 30, 2016
by component:
Cash flow
hedges
net
unrealized
gain (loss)
Pension
and
other
postretirement
liabilities
Net
unrealized
investment
gain (loss)
Foreign
currency
translation
Total
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
(In Thousands)
Beginning balance, January 1, 2016
$105,970
($466,604
)
$367,557
$2,028
$8,951
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications
56,169
—
49,048
(1,188
)
104,029
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
(129,716
)
12,605
(5,024
)
—
(122,135
)
Net other comprehensive income (loss) for the period
(73,547
)
12,605
44,024
(1,188
)
(18,106
)
Ending balance, June 30, 2016
$32,423
($453,999
)
$411,581
$840
($9,155
)
The following table presents changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for Entergy Louisiana for the
three months ended June 30, 2017
and 2016:
Pension and Other
Postretirement Liabilities
2017
2016
(In Thousands)
Beginning balance, April 1,
($48,812
)
($56,675
)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss)
(310
)
(230
)
Net other comprehensive income (loss) for the period
(310
)
(230
)
Ending balance, June 30,
($49,122
)
($56,905
)
41
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
The following table presents changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for Entergy Louisiana for the
six months ended June 30, 2017
and 2016:
Pension and Other
Postretirement Liabilities
2017
2016
(In Thousands)
Beginning balance, January 1,
($48,442
)
($56,412
)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss)
(680
)
(493
)
Net other comprehensive income (loss) for the period
(680
)
(493
)
Ending balance, June 30,
($49,122
)
($56,905
)
Total reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (AOCI) for Entergy for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 are as follows:
Amounts reclassified
from AOCI
Income Statement Location
2017
2016
(In Thousands)
Cash flow hedges net unrealized gain (loss)
Power contracts
$12,695
$45,975
Competitive business operating revenues
Interest rate swaps
(219
)
30
Miscellaneous - net
Total realized gain (loss) on cash flow hedges
12,476
46,005
(4,368
)
(16,102
)
Income taxes
Total realized gain (loss) on cash flow hedges (net of tax)
$8,108
$29,903
Pension and other postretirement liabilities
Amortization of prior-service credit
$6,564
$7,355
(a)
Amortization of loss
(21,554
)
(15,177
)
(a)
Settlement loss
(1,765
)
—
(a)
Total amortization
(16,755
)
(7,822
)
5,839
2,779
Income taxes
Total amortization (net of tax)
($10,916
)
($5,043
)
Net unrealized investment gain (loss)
Realized gain (loss)
$43,479
$6,000
Interest and investment income
(21,305
)
(2,939
)
Income taxes
Total realized investment gain (loss) (net of tax)
$22,174
$3,061
Total reclassifications for the period (net of tax)
$19,366
$27,921
(a)
These accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) components are included in the computation of net periodic pension and other postretirement cost. See Note 6 to the financial statements herein for additional details.
42
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
Total reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (AOCI) for Entergy for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 are as follows:
Amounts reclassified
from AOCI
Income Statement Location
2017
2016
(In Thousands)
Cash flow hedges net unrealized gain (loss)
Power contracts
$63,922
$199,933
Competitive business operating revenues
Interest rate swaps
(469
)
(370
)
Miscellaneous - net
Total realized gain (loss) on cash flow hedges
63,453
199,563
(22,209
)
(69,847
)
Income taxes
Total realized gain (loss) on cash flow hedges (net of tax)
$41,244
$129,716
Pension and other postretirement liabilities
Amortization of prior-service credit
$13,126
$14,710
(a)
Amortization of loss
(43,125
)
(30,352
)
(a)
Settlement loss
(1,765
)
—
(a)
Total amortization
(31,764
)
(15,642
)
12,216
3,037
Income taxes
Total amortization (net of tax)
($19,548
)
($12,605
)
Net unrealized investment gain (loss)
Realized gain (loss)
$47,489
$9,850
Interest and investment income
(23,270
)
(4,826
)
Income taxes
Total realized investment gain (loss) (net of tax)
$24,219
$5,024
Total reclassifications for the period (net of tax)
$45,915
$122,135
(a)
These accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) components are included in the computation of net periodic pension and other postretirement cost. See Note 6 to the financial statements herein for additional details.
43
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
Total reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (AOCI) for Entergy Louisiana for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 are as follows:
Amounts reclassified
from AOCI
Income Statement Location
2017
2016
(In Thousands)
Pension and other postretirement liabilities
Amortization of prior-service credit
$1,934
$1,947
(a)
Amortization of loss
(1,332
)
(1,573
)
(a)
Total amortization
602
374
(292
)
(144
)
Income taxes
Total amortization (net of tax)
310
230
Total reclassifications for the period (net of tax)
$310
$230
(a)
These accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) components are included in the computation of net periodic pension and other postretirement cost. See Note 6 to the financial statements herein for additional details.
Total reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (AOCI) for Entergy Louisiana for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 are as follows:
Amounts reclassified
from AOCI
Income Statement Location
2017
2016
(In Thousands)
Pension and other postretirement liabilities
Amortization of prior-service credit
$3,868
$3,894
(a)
Amortization of loss
(2,664
)
(3,142
)
(a)
Total amortization
1,204
752
(524
)
(259
)
Income taxes
Total amortization (net of tax)
680
493
Total reclassifications for the period (net of tax)
$680
$493
(a)
These accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) components are included in the computation of net periodic pension and other postretirement cost. See Note 6 to the financial statements herein for additional details.
NOTE 4. REVOLVING CREDIT FACILITIES, LINES OF CREDIT, SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS, AND LONG-TERM DEBT
(Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy)
Entergy Corporation has in place a credit facility that has a borrowing capacity of
$3.5 billion
and expires in August 2021. Entergy Corporation also has the ability to issue letters of credit against
50%
of the total borrowing capacity of the credit facility. The commitment fee is currently
0.225%
of the undrawn commitment amount. Commitment fees and interest rates on loans under the credit facility can fluctuate depending on the senior unsecured debt ratings of Entergy Corporation. The weighted average interest rate for the
six months ended June 30,
44
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
2017
was
2.38%
on the drawn portion of the facility. Following is a summary of the borrowings outstanding and capacity available under the facility as of
June 30, 2017
.
Capacity
Borrowings
Letters
of Credit
Capacity
Available
(In Millions)
$3,500
$225
$6
$3,269
Entergy Corporation’s credit facility requires Entergy to maintain a consolidated debt ratio, as defined, of
65%
or less of its total capitalization. Entergy is in compliance with this covenant. If Entergy fails to meet this ratio, or if Entergy Corporation or one of the Utility operating companies (except Entergy New Orleans) defaults on other indebtedness or is in bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings, an acceleration of the facility maturity date may occur.
Entergy Corporation has a commercial paper program with a Board-approved program limit of up to
$1.5 billion
. At
June 30, 2017
, Entergy Corporation had
$1.1 billion
of commercial paper outstanding. The weighted-average interest rate for the
six months ended June 30, 2017
was
1.38%
.
Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, and Entergy Texas each had credit facilities available as of
June 30, 2017
as follows:
Company
Expiration
Date
Amount of
Facility
Interest Rate (a)
Amount Drawn
as of
June 30, 2017
Letters of Credit
Outstanding as of June 30, 2017
Entergy Arkansas
April 2018
$20 million (b)
2.48%
$—
$—
Entergy Arkansas
August 2021
$150 million (c)
2.48%
$—
$—
Entergy Louisiana
August 2021
$350 million (d)
2.48%
$—
$4.5 million
Entergy Mississippi
May 2018
$37.5 million (e)
2.73%
$—
$—
Entergy Mississippi
May 2018
$35 million (e)
2.73%
$—
$—
Entergy Mississippi
May 2018
$20 million (e)
2.73%
$—
$—
Entergy Mississippi
May 2018
$10 million (e)
2.73%
$—
$—
Entergy New Orleans
November 2018
$25 million (f)
2.70%
$—
$0.8 million
Entergy Texas
August 2021
$150 million (g)
2.73%
$—
$13.3 million
(a)
The interest rate is the rate as of
June 30, 2017
that would most likely apply to outstanding borrowings under the facility.
(b)
Borrowings under the Entergy Arkansas credit facility may be secured by a security interest in its accounts receivable at Entergy Arkansas’s option.
(c)
The credit facility allows Entergy Arkansas to issue letters of credit against
50%
of the borrowing capacity of the facility.
(d)
The credit facility allows Entergy Louisiana to issue letters of credit against
50%
of the borrowing capacity of the facility.
(e)
Borrowings under the Entergy Mississippi credit facilities may be secured by a security interest in its accounts receivable at Entergy Mississippi’s option.
(f)
The credit facility allows Entergy New Orleans to issue letters of credit against
$10 million
of the borrowing capacity of the facility.
(g)
The credit facility allows Entergy Texas to issue letters of credit against
50%
of the borrowing capacity of the facility.
45
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
The commitment fees on the credit facilities range from
0.075%
to
0.275%
of the undrawn commitment amount. Each of the credit facilities requires the Registrant Subsidiary borrower to maintain a debt ratio, as defined, of 65% or less of its total capitalization. Each Registrant Subsidiary is in compliance with this covenant.
In addition, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, and Entergy Texas each entered into one or more uncommitted standby letter of credit facilities as a means to post collateral to support its obligations to MISO. Following is a summary of the uncommitted standby letter of credit facilities as of
June 30, 2017
:
Company
Amount of
Uncommitted Facility
Letter of Credit Fee
Letters of Credit
Issued as of June 30, 2017 (a)
Entergy Arkansas
$25 million
0.70%
$1.0 million
Entergy Louisiana
$125 million
0.70%
$36.8 million
Entergy Mississippi
$40 million
0.70%
$7.8 million
Entergy New Orleans
$15 million
0.75%
$5.6 million
Entergy Texas
$50 million
0.70%
$22.3 million
(a)
As of June 30, 2017, letters of credit posted with MISO covered financial transmission rights exposure of
$0.3 million
for Entergy Arkansas and
$0.1 million
for Entergy Mississippi. See Note 8 to the financial statements for discussion of financial transmission rights.
The short-term borrowings of the Registrant Subsidiaries are limited to amounts authorized by the FERC. The current FERC-authorized limits are effective through October 31, 2017. In addition to borrowings from commercial banks, these companies may also borrow from the Entergy System money pool and from other internal short-term borrowing arrangements. The money pool and the other internal borrowing arrangements are inter-company borrowing arrangements designed to reduce the Utility subsidiaries’ dependence on external short-term borrowings. Borrowings from internal and external short term borrowings combined may not exceed the FERC-authorized limits. The following are the FERC-authorized limits for short-term borrowings and the outstanding short-term borrowings as of
June 30, 2017
(aggregating both internal and external short-term borrowings) for the Registrant Subsidiaries:
Authorized
Borrowings
(In Millions)
Entergy Arkansas
$250
$14
Entergy Louisiana
$450
$—
Entergy Mississippi
$175
$56
Entergy New Orleans
$100
$—
Entergy Texas
$200
$39
System Energy
$200
$—
Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee Credit Facilities
Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee has a credit facility guaranteed by Entergy Corporation with a borrowing capacity of
$100 million
, which expires in January 2018. Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee does not have the ability to issue letters of credit against the credit facility. This facility provides working capital to Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee for general business purposes including, without limitation, the decommissioning of Vermont Yankee. The commitment fee is currently
0.20%
of the undrawn commitment amount. As of
June 30, 2017
,
$71 million
in cash borrowings were outstanding under the credit facility. The weighted average interest rate for the six months ended
June 30, 2017
was
2.44%
on the drawn portion of the facility.
Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee also has an uncommitted credit facility guaranteed by Entergy Corporation with a borrowing capacity of
$85 million
, which expires in January 2018. Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee does not
46
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
have the ability to issue letters of credit against the credit facility. This facility provides an additional funding source to Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee for general business purposes including, without limitation, the decommissioning of Vermont Yankee. As of
June 30, 2017
, there were no cash borrowings outstanding under the credit facility. The rate as of
June 30, 2017
that would most likely apply to outstanding borrowings under the facility was
2.72%
.
Variable Interest Entities
(Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, and System Energy)
See Note 17 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the consolidation of the nuclear fuel company variable interest entities (VIEs). To finance the acquisition and ownership of nuclear fuel, the nuclear fuel company VIEs have credit facilities and three of the four VIEs also issue commercial paper as of
June 30, 2017
as follows:
Company
Expiration
Date
Amount
of
Facility
Weighted Average Interest Rate on Borrowings (a)
Amount
Outstanding as of
June 30, 2017
(Dollars in Millions)
Entergy Arkansas VIE
May 2019
$80
2.39%
$31.4 (b)
Entergy Louisiana River Bend VIE
May 2019
$105
2.12%
$15.5
Entergy Louisiana Waterford VIE
May 2019
$85
2.38%
$70.8 (c)
System Energy VIE
May 2019
$120
2.42%
$103.2 (d)
(a)
Includes letter of credit fees and bank fronting fees on commercial paper issuances by the nuclear fuel company variable interest entities for Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, and System Energy. The nuclear fuel company variable interest entity for Entergy Louisiana River Bend does not issue commercial paper, but borrows directly on its bank credit facility.
(b)
Includes borrowings on the credit facility and commercial paper. Commercial paper is classified as a current liability and the amount outstanding for Entergy Arkansas VIE as of June 30, 2017 was
$14.7 million
.
(c)
Includes borrowings on the credit facility and commercial paper. Commercial paper is classified as a current liability and the amount outstanding for Entergy Louisiana Waterford VIE as of June 30, 2017 was
$34.5 million
.
(d)
Includes borrowings on the credit facility and commercial paper. Commercial paper is classified as a current liability and the amount outstanding for System Energy VIE as of June 30, 2017 was
$53.2 million
.
The commitment fees on the credit facilities are
0.10%
of the undrawn commitment amount for the Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, and System Energy VIEs. Each credit facility requires the respective lessee of nuclear fuel (Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, or Entergy Corporation as guarantor for System Energy) to maintain a consolidated debt ratio, as defined, of
70%
or less of its total capitalization.
47
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
The nuclear fuel company variable interest entities had notes payable that are included in debt on the respective balance sheets as of
June 30, 2017
as follows:
Company
Description
Amount
Entergy Arkansas VIE
2.62% Series K due December 2017
$60 million
Entergy Arkansas VIE
3.65% Series L due July 2021
$90 million
Entergy Arkansas VIE
3.17% Series M due December 2023
$40 million
Entergy Louisiana River Bend VIE
3.25% Series Q due July 2017
$75 million
Entergy Louisiana River Bend VIE
3.38% Series R due August 2020
$70 million
Entergy Louisiana Waterford VIE
3.25% Series G due July 2017
$25 million
Entergy Louisiana Waterford VIE
3.92% Series H due February 2021
$40 million
Entergy Louisiana Waterford VIE
3.22% Series I due December 2023
$20 million
System Energy VIE
3.78% Series I due October 2018
$85 million
In accordance with regulatory treatment, interest on the nuclear fuel company variable interest entities’ credit facilities, commercial paper, and long-term notes payable is reported in fuel expense.
Debt Issuances and Retirements
(Entergy Arkansas)
In May 2017, Entergy Arkansas issued
$220 million
of
3.5%
Series first mortgage bonds due April 2026. These bonds were a further issuance of the 3.5% Series first mortgage bonds issued in January 2016 and June 2016. Entergy Arkansas used a portion of the proceeds from the May 2017 issuance for general corporate purposes and plans to use the remainder of the proceeds to pay, at maturity, its
$54.7 million
of
1.55%
pollution control revenue refunding bonds due October 2017.
(Entergy Louisiana)
In May 2017, Entergy Louisiana issued
$450 million
of
3.12%
collateral trust mortgage bonds due September 2027. Entergy Louisiana used the proceeds to finance the construction of the St. Charles Power Station, to pay, at maturity, its
$45.3 million
of Waterford Series collateral trust mortgage notes, and for general corporate purposes.
In July 2017 the Entergy Louisiana River Bend nuclear fuel company variable interest entity paid, at maturity, its
$75 million
of
3.25%
Series Q notes.
In July 2017 the Entergy Louisiana Waterford nuclear fuel company variable interest entity paid, at maturity, its
$25 million
of
3.25%
Series G notes.
(System Energy)
In February 2017 the System Energy nuclear fuel company variable interest entity paid, at maturity, its
$50 million
of
4.02%
Series H notes.
48
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
Fair Value
The book value and the fair value of long-term debt for Entergy Corporation and the Registrant Subsidiaries as of
June 30, 2017
are as follows:
Book Value
of Long-Term Debt
Fair Value
of Long-Term Debt (a) (b)
(In Thousands)
Entergy
$15,010,668
$15,239,655
Entergy Arkansas
$3,064,261
$2,942,288
Entergy Louisiana
$6,246,015
$6,484,470
Entergy Mississippi
$1,121,356
$1,137,274
Entergy New Orleans
$444,159
$467,094
Entergy Texas
$1,471,091
$1,560,208
System Energy
$551,296
$482,650
(a)
The values exclude lease obligations of
$34 million
at System Energy and long-term DOE obligations of
$182 million
at Entergy Arkansas, and include debt due within one year.
(b)
Fair values are classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy discussed in Note 8 to the financial statements herein and are based on prices derived from inputs such as benchmark yields and reported trades.
The book value and the fair value of long-term debt for Entergy Corporation and the Registrant Subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2016
were as follows:
Book Value
of Long-Term Debt
Fair Value
of Long-Term Debt (a) (b)
(In Thousands)
Entergy
$14,832,555
$14,815,535
Entergy Arkansas
$2,829,785
$2,623,910
Entergy Louisiana
$5,812,791
$5,929,488
Entergy Mississippi
$1,120,916
$1,086,203
Entergy New Orleans
$448,994
$455,459
Entergy Texas
$1,508,407
$1,600,156
System Energy
$551,132
$529,520
(a)
The values exclude lease obligations of
$57 million
at Entergy Louisiana and
$34 million
at System Energy and long-term DOE obligations of
$182 million
at Entergy Arkansas, and include debt due within one year.
(b)
Fair values are classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy discussed in Note 8 to the financial statements herein and are based on prices derived from inputs such as benchmark yields and reported trades.
NOTE 5. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION (Entergy Corporation)
Entergy grants stock and stock-based awards, which are described more fully in Note 12 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K. Awards under Entergy’s plans generally vest over
three
years.
49
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
Effective January 1, 2017, Entergy adopted ASU 2016-09, which permits the election of an accounting policy change to the method of recognizing forfeitures of stock-based compensation. Previously, Entergy recorded an estimate of the number of forfeitures expected to occur each period. Entergy elected to change this policy to account for forfeitures when they occur. This accounting change was applied retrospectively, but did not result in an adjustment to retained earnings as of January 1, 2017.
Stock Options
Entergy granted options on
791,900
shares of its common stock under the 2015 Equity Ownership Plan during the first quarter 2017 with a weighted-average fair value of
$6.54
per option. As of
June 30, 2017
, there were options on
6,162,359
shares of common stock outstanding with a weighted-average exercise price of
$81.65
. The intrinsic value, which has no effect on net income, of the outstanding stock options is calculated by the positive difference between the weighted average exercise price of the stock options granted and Entergy Corporation’s common stock price as of
June 30, 2017
. Because Entergy’s stock price at
June 30, 2017
was less than the weighted average exercise price, the aggregate intrinsic value of the stock options outstanding as of
June 30, 2017
was zero. The intrinsic value of all “in the money” stock options was
$21.5 million
as of
June 30, 2017
.
The following table includes financial information for outstanding stock options for the
three months ended June 30, 2017
and
2016
:
2017
2016
(In Millions)
Compensation expense included in Entergy’s net income
$1.1
$1.1
Tax benefit recognized in Entergy’s net income
$0.4
$0.4
Compensation cost capitalized as part of fixed assets and inventory
$0.2
$0.2
The following table includes financial information for outstanding stock options for the
six months ended June 30, 2017
and
2016
:
2017
2016
(In Millions)
Compensation expense included in Entergy’s net income
$2.2
$2.2
Tax benefit recognized in Entergy’s net income
$0.8
$0.8
Compensation cost capitalized as part of fixed assets and inventory
$0.4
$0.4
Other Equity Awards
In January 2017 the Board approved and Entergy granted
379,850
restricted stock awards and
220,450
long-term incentive awards under the 2015 Equity Ownership Plan. The restricted stock awards were made effective as of January 26, 2017 and were valued at
$70.53
per share, which was the closing price of Entergy’s common stock on that date. One-third of the restricted stock awards will vest upon each anniversary of the grant date. In addition, long-term incentive awards were granted in the form of performance units that represent the value of, and are settled with, one share of Entergy Corporation common stock at the end of the three-year performance period, plus dividends accrued during the performance period on the number of performance units earned. The performance units were granted effective as of January 26, 2017 and were valued at
$71.40
per share. Entergy considers various factors, primarily market conditions, in determining the value of the performance units. Shares of restricted stock have the same dividend and voting rights as other common stock, are considered issued and outstanding shares of Entergy upon vesting, and are expensed ratably over the
3
-year vesting period. Performance units have the same dividend rights as shares of Entergy common stock, are considered issued and outstanding shares of Entergy upon vesting, and are expensed ratably over the
3
-year vesting period.
50
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
The following table includes financial information for other outstanding equity awards for the
three months ended June 30, 2017
and
2016
:
2017
2016
(In Millions)
Compensation expense included in Entergy’s net income
$8.2
$8.5
Tax benefit recognized in Entergy’s net income
$3.2
$3.3
Compensation cost capitalized as part of fixed assets and inventory
$2.2
$1.9
The following table includes financial information for other outstanding equity awards for the
six months ended
June 30, 2017
and
2016
:
2017
2016
(In Millions)
Compensation expense included in Entergy’s net income
$16.4
$16.9
Tax benefit recognized in Entergy’s net income
$6.3
$6.5
Compensation cost capitalized as part of fixed assets and inventory
$4.2
$3.7
NOTE 6. RETIREMENT AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS (Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy)
Components of Qualified Net Pension Cost
Entergy’s qualified pension cost, including amounts capitalized, for the second quarters of 2017 and 2016, included the following components:
2017
2016
(In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned during the period
$33,410
$35,811
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation
65,206
65,403
Expected return on assets
(102,056
)
(97,366
)
Amortization of prior service cost
65
270
Amortization of loss
56,930
48,824
Net pension costs
$53,555
$52,942
Entergy’s qualified pension cost, including amounts capitalized, for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, included the following components:
2017
2016
(In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned during the period
$66,820
$71,622
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation
130,412
130,806
Expected return on assets
(204,112
)
(194,732
)
Amortization of prior service cost
130
540
Amortization of loss
113,860
97,648
Net pension costs
$107,110
$105,884
51
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
The Registrant Subsidiaries’ qualified pension cost, including amounts capitalized, for their employees for the second quarters of 2017 and 2016, included the following components:
2017
Entergy
Arkansas
Entergy
Louisiana
Entergy
Mississippi
Entergy
New Orleans
Entergy
Texas
System
Energy
(In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned during the period
$5,090
$6,925
$1,472
$625
$1,364
$1,536
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation
12,944
14,809
3,732
1,791
3,392
3,091
Expected return on assets
(20,427
)
(23,017
)
(6,131
)
(2,800
)
(6,180
)
(4,663
)
Amortization of loss
11,640
12,354
3,053
1,658
2,310
2,964
Net pension cost
$9,247
$11,071
$2,126
$1,274
$886
$2,928
2016
Entergy
Arkansas
Entergy
Louisiana
Entergy
Mississippi
Entergy
New Orleans
Entergy
Texas
System
Energy
(In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned during the period
$5,181
$7,049
$1,562
$656
$1,416
$1,566
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation
13,055
14,870
3,811
1,814
3,557
2,992
Expected return on assets
(19,772
)
(22,096
)
(5,981
)
(2,687
)
(6,062
)
(4,459
)
Amortization of loss
10,936
11,946
2,985
1,615
2,340
2,604
Net pension cost
$9,400
$11,769
$2,377
$1,398
$1,251
$2,703
The Registrant Subsidiaries’ qualified pension cost, including amounts capitalized, for their employees for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, included the following components:
2017
Entergy
Arkansas
Entergy
Louisiana
Entergy
Mississippi
Entergy
New Orleans
Entergy
Texas
System
Energy
(In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned during the period
$10,180
$13,850
$2,944
$1,250
$2,728
$3,072
Interest cost on projects benefit obligation
25,888
29,618
7,464
3,582
6,784
6,182
Expected return on assets
(40,854
)
(46,034
)
(12,262
)
(5,600
)
(12,360
)
(9,326
)
Amortization of loss
23,280
24,708
6,106
3,316
4,620
5,928
Net pension cost
$18,494
$22,142
$4,252
$2,548
$1,772
$5,856
2016
Entergy
Arkansas
Entergy
Louisiana
Entergy
Mississippi
Entergy
New Orleans
Entergy
Texas
System
Energy
(In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned during the period
$10,362
$14,098
$3,124
$1,312
$2,832
$3,132
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation
26,110
29,740
7,622
3,628
7,114
5,984
Expected return on assets
(39,544
)
(44,192
)
(11,962
)
(5,374
)
(12,124
)
(8,918
)
Amortization of loss
21,872
23,892
5,970
3,230
4,680
5,208
Net pension cost
$18,800
$23,538
$4,754
$2,796
$2,502
$5,406
52
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
Non-Qualified Net Pension Cost
Entergy recognized
$8.5 million
and
$4.3 million
in pension cost for its non-qualified pension plans in the
second
quarters of
2017
and
2016
, respectively. Reflected in the pension cost for non-qualified pension plans in the second quarter 2017 is a
$4 million
settlement charge recognized in June 2017 related to the payment of lump sum benefits out of this plan. Entergy recognized
$13.1 million
and
$8.5 million
in pensions costs for its non-qualified pension plans for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Reflected in the pension cost for non-qualified pension plans for the six months ended June 30, 2017 is a
$4 million
settlement charge recognized in June 2017 related to the payment of lump sum benefits out of this plan.
The Registrant Subsidiaries recognized the following pension cost for their employees for their non-qualified pension plans in the second quarters of 2017 and 2016:
Entergy
Arkansas
Entergy
Louisiana
Entergy
Mississippi
Entergy
New Orleans
Entergy
Texas
(In Thousands)
2017
$267
$47
$63
$18
$126
2016
$106
$59
$59
$16
$127
The Registrant Subsidiaries recognized the following pension cost for their employees for their non-qualified pension plans for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016:
Entergy
Arkansas
Entergy
Louisiana
Entergy
Mississippi
Entergy
New Orleans
Entergy
Texas
(In Thousands)
2017
$372
$96
$127
$36
$253
2016
$212
$118
$118
$32
$254
Reflected in Entergy Arkansas’s non-qualified pension costs in the second quarter 2017 and for the six months ended June 30, 2017 is
$163 thousand
in settlement charges recognized in June 2017 related to the payment of lump sum benefits out of the plan.
Components of Net Other Postretirement Benefit Cost
Entergy’s other postretirement benefit cost, including amounts capitalized, for the second quarters of 2017 and 2016, included the following components:
2017
2016
(In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned during the period
$6,729
$8,073
Interest cost on accumulated postretirement benefit obligation (APBO)
13,960
14,083
Expected return on assets
(9,408
)
(10,455
)
Amortization of prior service credit
(10,356
)
(11,373
)
Amortization of loss
5,476
4,554
Net other postretirement benefit cost
$6,401
$4,882
53
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
Entergy’s other postretirement benefit cost, including amounts capitalized, for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, included the following components:
2017
2016
(In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned during the period
$13,458
$16,146
Interest cost on accumulated postretirement benefit obligation (APBO)
27,920
28,166
Expected return on assets
(18,816
)
(20,910
)
Amortization of prior service credit
(20,712
)
(22,746
)
Amortization of loss
10,952
9,108
Net other postretirement benefit cost
$12,802
$9,764
The Registrant Subsidiaries’ other postretirement benefit cost, including amounts capitalized, for their employees for the second quarters of 2017 and 2016, included the following components:
2017
Entergy
Arkansas
Entergy
Louisiana
Entergy
Mississippi
Entergy
New Orleans
Entergy
Texas
System
Energy
(In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned during the period
$863
$1,593
$290
$142
$372
$320
Interest cost on APBO
2,255
3,025
690
469
1,124
559
Expected return on assets
(3,959
)
—
(1,200
)
(1,159
)
(2,180
)
(717
)
Amortization of prior service credit
(1,278
)
(1,934
)
(456
)
(186
)
(579
)
(378
)
Amortization of loss
1,115
465
419
105
826
390
Net other postretirement benefit cost
($1,004
)
$3,149
($257
)
($629
)
($437
)
$174
2016
Entergy
Arkansas
Entergy
Louisiana
Entergy
Mississippi
Entergy
New Orleans
Entergy
Texas
System
Energy
(In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned during the period
$978
$1,869
$386
$156
$398
$334
Interest cost on APBO
2,324
3,260
709
448
1,039
529
Expected return on assets
(4,464
)
—
(1,379
)
(1,154
)
(2,394
)
(814
)
Amortization of prior service credit
(1,368
)
(1,947
)
(234
)
(186
)
(681
)
(393
)
Amortization of loss
1,064
732
223
37
537
287
Net other postretirement benefit cost
($1,466
)
$3,914
($295
)
($699
)
($1,101
)
($57
)
54
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
The Registrant Subsidiaries’ other postretirement benefit cost, including amounts capitalized, for their employees for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, included the following components:
2017
Entergy
Arkansas
Entergy
Louisiana
Entergy
Mississippi
Entergy
New Orleans
Entergy
Texas
System
Energy
(In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned during the period
$1,726
$3,186
$580
$284
$744
$640
Interest cost on APBO
4,510
6,050
1,380
938
2,248
1,118
Expected return on assets
(7,918
)
—
(2,400
)
(2,318
)
(4,360
)
(1,434
)
Amortization of prior service credit
(2,556
)
(3,868
)
(912
)
(372
)
(1,158
)
(756
)
Amortization of loss
2,230
930
838
210
1,652
780
Net other postretirement benefit cost
($2,008
)
$6,298
($514
)
($1,258
)
($874
)
$348
2016
Entergy
Arkansas
Entergy
Louisiana
Entergy
Mississippi
Entergy
New Orleans
Entergy
Texas
System
Energy
(In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned during the period
$1,956
$3,738
$772
$312
$796
$668
Interest cost on APBO
4,648
6,520
1,418
896
2,078
1,058
Expected return on assets
(8,928
)
—
(2,758
)
(2,308
)
(4,788
)
(1,628
)
Amortization of prior service credit
(2,736
)
(3,894
)
(468
)
(372
)
(1,362
)
(786
)
Amortization of loss
2,128
1,464
446
74
1,074
574
Net other postretirement benefit cost
($2,932
)
$7,828
($590
)
($1,398
)
($2,202
)
($114
)
Reclassification out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Entergy and Entergy Louisiana reclassified the following costs out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (before taxes and including amounts capitalized) for the second quarters of 2017 and 2016:
2017
Qualified
Pension
Costs
Other
Postretirement
Costs
Non-Qualified
Pension Costs
Total
(In Thousands)
Entergy
Amortization of prior service (cost)/credit
($65
)
$6,718
($89
)
$6,564
Amortization of loss
(18,450
)
(2,202
)
(902
)
(21,554
)
Settlement loss
—
—
(1,765
)
(1,765
)
($18,515
)
$4,516
($2,756
)
($16,755
)
Entergy Louisiana
Amortization of prior service credit
$—
$1,934
$—
$1,934
Amortization of loss
(865
)
(465
)
(2
)
(1,332
)
($865
)
$1,469
($2
)
$602
55
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
2016
Qualified
Pension
Costs
Other
Postretirement
Costs
Non-Qualified
Pension Costs
Total
(In Thousands)
Entergy
Amortization of prior service (cost)/credit
($270
)
$7,738
($113
)
$7,355
Amortization of loss
(12,482
)
(2,063
)
(632
)
(15,177
)
($12,752
)
$5,675
($745
)
($7,822
)
Entergy Louisiana
Amortization of prior service credit
$—
$1,947
$—
$1,947
Amortization of loss
(836
)
(732
)
(5
)
(1,573
)
($836
)
$1,215
($5
)
$374
Entergy and Entergy Louisiana reclassified the following costs out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (before taxes and including amounts capitalized) for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016:
2017
Qualified
Pension
Costs
Other
Postretirement
Costs
Non-Qualified
Pension Costs
Total
(In Thousands)
Entergy
Amortization of prior service (cost)/credit
($130
)
$13,435
($179
)
$13,126
Amortization of loss
(36,899
)
(4,404
)
(1,822
)
(43,125
)
Settlement loss
—
—
(1,765
)
(1,765
)
($37,029
)
$9,031
($3,766
)
($31,764
)
Entergy Louisiana
Amortization of prior service credit
$—
$3,868
$—
$3,868
Amortization of loss
(1,730
)
(930
)
(4
)
(2,664
)
($1,730
)
$2,938
($4
)
$1,204
2016
Qualified
Pension
Costs
Other
Postretirement
Costs
Non-Qualified
Pension Costs
Total
(In Thousands)
Entergy
Amortization of prior service (cost)/credit
($540
)
$15,476
($226
)
$14,710
Amortization of loss
(24,964
)
(4,126
)
(1,262
)
(30,352
)
($25,504
)
$11,350
($1,488
)
($15,642
)
Entergy Louisiana
Amortization of prior service credit
$—
$3,894
$—
$3,894
Amortization of loss
(1,672
)
(1,464
)
(6
)
(3,142
)
($1,672
)
$2,430
($6
)
$752
56
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
Employer Contributions
Based on current assumptions, Entergy expects to contribute
$409.9 million
to its qualified pension plans in 2017. As of
June 30, 2017
, Entergy had contributed
$176 million
to its pension plans. Based on current assumptions, the Registrant Subsidiaries expect to contribute the following to qualified pension plans for their employees in
2017
:
Entergy
Arkansas
Entergy
Louisiana
Entergy
Mississippi
Entergy
New Orleans
Entergy
Texas
System
Energy
(In Thousands)
Expected 2017 pension contributions
$79,495
$87,923
$19,146
$9,920
$17,064
$18,180
Pension contributions made through June 2017
$34,507
$37,519
$8,251
$4,361
$7,227
$8,182
Remaining estimated pension contributions to be made in 2017
$44,988
$50,404
$10,895
$5,559
$9,837
$9,998
NOTE 7. BUSINESS SEGMENT INFORMATION (Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy)
Entergy Corporation
Entergy’s reportable segments as of
June 30, 2017
are Utility and Entergy Wholesale Commodities. Utility includes the generation, transmission, distribution, and sale of electric power in portions of Arkansas, Mississippi, Texas, and Louisiana, including the City of New Orleans; and operation of a small natural gas distribution business. Entergy Wholesale Commodities includes the ownership, operation, and decommissioning of nuclear power plants located in the northern United States and the sale of the electric power produced by its operating plants to wholesale customers. Entergy Wholesale Commodities also provides services to other nuclear power plant owners and owns interests in non-nuclear power plants that sell the electric power produced by those plants to wholesale customers. “All Other” includes the parent company, Entergy Corporation, and other business activity.
Entergy’s segment financial information for the second quarters of
2017
and
2016
is as follows:
Utility
Entergy
Wholesale
Commodities
All Other
Eliminations
Entergy
(In Thousands)
2017
Operating revenues
$2,301,332
$317,255
$—
($37
)
$2,618,550
Income taxes
$130,851
($454,944
)
($13,019
)
$—
($337,112
)
Consolidated net income (loss)
$246,382
$223,886
($25,001
)
($31,899
)
$413,368
2016
Operating revenues
$2,118,478
$344,110
$—
($26
)
$2,462,562
Income taxes
($3,785
)
($235,055
)
($10,133
)
$—
($248,973
)
Consolidated net income (loss)
$380,317
$250,874
($26,703
)
($31,898
)
$572,590
57
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
Entergy’s segment financial information for the
six months ended
June 30, 2017
and
2016
is as follows:
Utility
Entergy
Wholesale
Commodities
All Other
Eliminations
Entergy
(In Thousands)
2017
Operating revenues
$4,336,444
$870,622
$—
($58
)
$5,207,008
Income taxes
$229,343
($533,281
)
($25,412
)
$—
($329,350
)
Consolidated net income (loss)
$414,005
$196,689
($47,477
)
($63,797
)
$499,420
Total assets as of June 30, 2017
$42,263,832
$5,627,284
$1,165,157
($3,049,236
)
$46,007,037
2016
Operating revenues
$4,206,272
$866,189
$—
($46
)
$5,072,415
Income taxes
$104,051
($182,741
)
($30,337
)
$—
($109,027
)
Consolidated net income (loss)
$579,968
$330,430
($38,769
)
($63,797
)
$807,832
Total assets as of December 31, 2016
$41,098,751
$6,696,038
$1,283,816
($3,174,171
)
$45,904,434
The Entergy Wholesale Commodities business is sometimes referred to as the “competitive businesses.” Eliminations are primarily intersegment activity. Almost all of Entergy’s goodwill is related to the Utility segment.
As discussed in Note 13 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K, Entergy management has undertaken a strategy to manage and reduce the risk of the Entergy Wholesale Commodities business, which includes taking actions to reduce the size of the merchant fleet. These decisions and transactions resulted in asset impairments; employee retention and severance expenses and other benefits-related costs; and contracted economic development contributions in 2016.
Additional restructuring charges for the second quarter 2017 were comprised of the following:
Employee retention and severance
expenses and other benefits-related costs
Contracted economic development costs
Total
(In Millions)
Balance as of April 1, 2017
$94
$21
$115
Restructuring costs accrued
42
—
42
Cash paid out
100
—
100
Balance as of June 30, 2017
$36
$21
$57
In addition, Entergy incurred
$194 million
of impairment charges in the second quarter 2017 related to nuclear fuel spending, nuclear refueling outage spending, and expenditures for capital assets. These costs are charged to expense as incurred as a result of the impaired value of the Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear plants’ long-lived assets due to the significantly reduced remaining estimated operating lives associated with management’s strategy to reduce the size of the Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ merchant fleet.
58
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
Additional restructuring charges for the six months ended June 30, 2017 were comprised of the following:
Employee retention and severance
expenses and other benefits-related costs
Contracted economic development costs
Total
(In Millions)
Balance as of January 1, 2017
$70
$21
$91
Restructuring costs accrued
66
—
66
Cash paid out
100
—
100
Balance as of June 30, 2017
$36
$21
$57
In addition, Entergy incurred
$405 million
of impairment charges in the six months ended June 30, 2017 related to nuclear fuel spending, nuclear refueling outage spending, and expenditures for capital assets.
Registrant Subsidiaries
Each of the Registrant Subsidiaries has one reportable segment, which is an integrated utility business, except for System Energy, which is an electricity generation business. Each of the Registrant Subsidiaries’ operations is managed on an integrated basis by that company because of the substantial effect of cost-based rates and regulatory oversight on the business process, cost structures, and operating results.
NOTE 8. RISK MANAGEMENT AND FAIR VALUES (Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy)
Market Risk
In the normal course of business, Entergy is exposed to a number of market risks. Market risk is the potential loss that Entergy may incur as a result of changes in the market or fair value of a particular commodity or instrument. All financial and commodity-related instruments, including derivatives, are subject to market risk including commodity price risk, equity price, and interest rate risk. Entergy uses derivatives primarily to mitigate commodity price risk, particularly power price and fuel price risk.
The Utility has limited exposure to the effects of market risk because it operates primarily under cost-based rate regulation. To the extent approved by their retail regulators, the Utility operating companies use derivative instruments to hedge the exposure to price volatility inherent in their purchased power, fuel, and gas purchased for resale costs that are recovered from customers.
As a wholesale generator, Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ core business is selling energy, measured in MWh, to its customers. Entergy Wholesale Commodities enters into forward contracts with its customers and also sells energy and capacity in the day ahead or spot markets. In addition to its forward physical power and gas contracts, Entergy Wholesale Commodities also uses a combination of financial contracts, including swaps, collars, and options, to mitigate commodity price risk. When the market price falls, the combination of instruments is expected to settle in gains that offset lower revenue from generation, which results in a more predictable cash flow.
Entergy’s exposure to market risk is determined by a number of factors, including the size, term, composition, and diversification of positions held, as well as market volatility and liquidity. For instruments such as options, the time period during which the option may be exercised and the relationship between the current market price of the underlying instrument and the option’s contractual strike or exercise price also affects the level of market risk. A significant factor influencing the overall level of market risk to which Entergy is exposed is its use of hedging techniques to mitigate such risk. Hedging instruments and volumes are chosen based on ability to mitigate risk associated with
59
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
future energy and capacity prices; however, other considerations are factored into hedge product and volume decisions including corporate liquidity, corporate credit ratings, counterparty credit risk, hedging costs, firm settlement risk, and product availability in the marketplace. Entergy manages market risk by actively monitoring compliance with stated risk management policies as well as monitoring the effectiveness of its hedging policies and strategies. Entergy’s risk management policies limit the amount of total net exposure and rolling net exposure during the stated periods. These policies, including related risk limits, are regularly assessed to ensure their appropriateness given Entergy’s objectives.
Derivatives
Some derivative instruments are classified as cash flow hedges due to their financial settlement provisions while others are classified as normal purchase/normal sale transactions due to their physical settlement provisions. Normal purchase/normal sale risk management tools include power purchase and sales agreements, fuel purchase agreements, capacity contracts, and tolling agreements. Financially-settled cash flow hedges can include natural gas and electricity swaps and options and interest rate swaps. Entergy may enter into financially-settled swap and option contracts to manage market risk that may or may not be designated as hedging instruments.
Entergy enters into derivatives to manage natural risks inherent in its physical or financial assets or liabilities. Electricity over-the-counter instruments and futures contracts that financially settle against day-ahead power pool prices are used to manage price exposure for Entergy Wholesale Commodities generation. The maximum length of time over which Entergy is currently hedging the variability in future cash flows with derivatives for forecasted power transactions at
June 30, 2017
is approximately
2.5
years. Planned generation currently under contract from Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear power plants is
89%
for the remainder of
2017
, of which approximately
59%
is sold under financial derivatives and the remainder under normal purchase/normal sale contracts. Total planned generation for the remainder of
2017
is
15
TWh.
Entergy may use standardized master netting agreements to help mitigate the credit risk of derivative instruments. These master agreements facilitate the netting of cash flows associated with a single counterparty and may include collateral requirements. Cash, letters of credit, and parental/affiliate guarantees may be obtained as security from counterparties in order to mitigate credit risk. The collateral agreements require a counterparty to post cash or letters of credit in the event an exposure exceeds an established threshold. The threshold represents an unsecured credit limit, which may be supported by a parental/affiliate guaranty, as determined in accordance with Entergy’s credit policy. In addition, collateral agreements allow for termination and liquidation of all positions in the event of a failure or inability to post collateral.
Certain of the agreements to sell the power produced by Entergy Wholesale Commodities power plants contain provisions that require an Entergy subsidiary to provide credit support to secure its obligations depending on the mark-to-market values of the contracts. The primary form of credit support to satisfy these requirements is an Entergy Corporation guarantee. As of
June 30, 2017
, there were no derivative contracts with counterparties in a liability position. In addition to the corporate guarantee,
$1 million
in cash collateral was required to be posted by the Entergy subsidiary to its counterparties and
$3 million
in cash collateral and
$19 million
in letters of credit were required to be posted by its counterparties to the Entergy subsidiary. As of
December 31, 2016
, derivative contracts with
three
counterparties were in a liability position (approximately
$8 million
total). In addition to the corporate guarantee,
$2 million
in cash collateral was required to be posted by the Entergy subsidiary to its counterparties. If the Entergy Corporation credit rating falls below investment grade, the effect of the corporate guarantee is typically ignored and Entergy would have to post collateral equal to the estimated outstanding liability under the contract at the applicable date.
Entergy manages fuel price volatility for its Louisiana jurisdictions (Entergy Louisiana and Entergy New Orleans) and Entergy Mississippi through the purchase of short-term natural gas swaps that financially settle against NYMEX futures. These swaps are marked-to-market through fuel expense with offsetting regulatory assets or liabilities. All benefits or costs of the program are recorded in fuel costs. The notional volumes of these swaps are based on a portion of projected annual exposure to gas for electric generation at Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Mississippi and projected winter purchases for gas distribution at Entergy Louisiana and Entergy New Orleans. The
60
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
total volume of natural gas swaps outstanding as of
June 30, 2017
is
34,696,750
MMBtu for Entergy, including
29,110,800
MMBtu for Entergy Louisiana and
5,585,950
MMBtu for Entergy Mississippi. Credit support for these natural gas swaps is covered by master agreements that do not require collateral based on mark-to-market value, but do carry adequate assurance language that may lead to requests for collateral.
During the second quarter 2017, Entergy participated in the annual financial transmission rights auction process for the MISO planning year of June 1, 2017 through May 31, 2018. Financial transmission rights are derivative instruments which represent economic hedges of future congestion charges that will be incurred in serving Entergy’s customer load. They are not designated as hedging instruments. Entergy initially records financial transmission rights at their estimated fair value and subsequently adjusts the carrying value to their estimated fair value at the end of each accounting period prior to settlement. Unrealized gains or losses on financial transmission rights held by Entergy Wholesale Commodities are included in operating revenues. The Utility operating companies recognize regulatory liabilities or assets for unrealized gains or losses on financial transmission rights. The total volume of financial transmission rights outstanding as of
June 30, 2017
is
106,060
GWh for Entergy, including
24,188
GWh for Entergy Arkansas,
47,173
GWh for Entergy Louisiana,
14,075
GWh for Entergy Mississippi,
5,316
GWh for Entergy New Orleans, and
14,572
GWh for Entergy Texas. Credit support for financial transmission rights held by the Utility operating companies is covered by cash and/or letters of credit issued by each Utility operating company as required by MISO. Credit support for financial transmission rights held by Entergy Wholesale Commodities is covered by cash. No cash or letters of credit were required to be posted for financial transmission rights exposure for Entergy Wholesale Commodities as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016. Letters of credit posted with MISO covered the financial transmission rights exposure for Entergy Arkansas and Entergy Mississippi as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.
61
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
The fair values of Entergy’s derivative instruments in the consolidated balance sheet as of
June 30, 2017
are shown in the table below. Certain investments, including those not designated as hedging instruments, are subject to master netting agreements and are presented in the balance sheet on a net basis in accordance with accounting guidance for derivatives and hedging.
Instrument
Balance Sheet Location
Fair Value (a)
Offset (b)
Net (c) (d)
Business
(In Millions)
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments
Assets:
Electricity swaps and options
Prepayments and other (current portion)
$40
($23)
$17
Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Electricity swaps and options
Other deferred debits and other assets (non-current portion)
$19
($9)
$10
Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Liabilities:
Electricity swaps and options
Other current liabilities
(current portion)
$15
($15)
$—
Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Electricity swaps and options
Other non-current liabilities (non-current portion)
$12
($10)
$2
Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
Assets:
Electricity swaps and options
Prepayments and other (current portion)
$16
($3)
$13
Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Electricity swaps and options
Other deferred debits and other assets (non-current portion)
$2
($2)
$—
Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Financial transmission rights
Prepayments and other
$61
($4)
$57
Utility and Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Liabilities:
Electricity swaps and options
Other current liabilities(current portion)
$10
($10)
$—
Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Electricity swaps and options
Other non-current liabilities (non-current portion)
$1
($1)
$—
Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Natural gas swaps
Other current liabilities
$5
$—
$5
Utility
62
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
The fair values of Entergy’s derivative instruments in the consolidated balance sheet as of
December 31, 2016
are shown in the table below. Certain investments, including those not designated as hedging instruments, are subject to master netting agreements and are presented in the balance sheet on a net basis in accordance with accounting guidance for derivatives and hedging.
Instrument
Balance Sheet Location
Fair Value (a)
Offset (b)
Net (c) (d)
Business
(In Millions)
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments
Assets:
Electricity swaps and options
Prepayments and other (current portion)
$25
($14)
$11
Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Electricity swaps and options
Other deferred debits and other assets (non-current portion)
$6
($6)
$—
Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Liabilities:
Electricity swaps and options
Other current liabilities (current portion)
$11
($10)
$1
Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Electricity swaps and options
Other non-current liabilities (non-current portion)
$16
($7)
$9
Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
Assets:
Electricity swaps and options
Prepayments and other (current portion)
$18
($13)
$5
Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Electricity swaps and options
Other deferred debits and other assets (non-current portion)
$5
($5)
$—
Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Natural gas swaps
Prepayments and other
$13
$—
$13
Utility
Financial transmission rights
Prepayments and other
$22
($1)
$21
Utility and Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Liabilities:
Electricity swaps and options
Other current liabilities (current portion)
$18
($17)
$1
Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Electricity swaps and options
Other non-current liabilities (non-current portion)
$4
($4)
$—
Entergy Wholesale Commodities
(a)
Represents the gross amounts of recognized assets/liabilities
(b)
Represents the netting of fair value balances with the same counterparty
(c)
Represents the net amounts of assets/liabilities presented on the Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries’ Consolidated Balance Sheet
(d)
Excludes cash collateral in the amount of
$1 million
posted and
$3 million
held as of June 30, 2017 and
$2 million
posted as of December 31, 2016. Also excludes
$19 million
in letters of credit held as of June 30, 2017.
63
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
The effects of Entergy’s derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges on the consolidated income statements for the three months ended
June 30, 2017
and
2016
are as follows:
Instrument
Amount of gain (loss)
recognized in other
comprehensive income
Income Statement location
Amount of gain
reclassified from
accumulated other comprehensive income into income (a)
(In Millions)
(In Millions)
2017
Electricity swaps and options
$43
Competitive businesses operating revenues
$13
2016
Electricity swaps and options
($53)
Competitive businesses operating revenues
$46
(a)
Before taxes of
$4 million
and
$16 million
for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively
The effects of Entergy’s derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges on the consolidated income statements for the six months ended
June 30, 2017
and
2016
are as follows:
Instrument
Amount of gain
recognized in other
comprehensive income
Income Statement location
Amount of gain
reclassified from
accumulated other comprehensive income into income (a)
(In Millions)
(In Millions)
2017
Electricity swaps and options
$93
Competitive businesses operating revenues
$64
2016
Electricity swaps and options
$86
Competitive businesses operating revenues
$200
(a)
Before taxes of
$22 million
and
$70 million
for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively
At each reporting period, Entergy measures its hedges for ineffectiveness. Any ineffectiveness is recognized in earnings during the period. The ineffective portion of cash flow hedges is recorded in competitive business operating revenues. The change in fair value of Entergy’s cash flow hedges due to ineffectiveness during the
three months ended June 30, 2017
and
2016
was
$5 million
and
($3) million
, respectively. The change in fair value of Entergy’s cash flow hedges due to ineffectiveness during the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 was
$4 million
and
($0.3) million
, respectively.
Based on market prices as of
June 30, 2017
, unrealized gains recorded in AOCI on cash flow hedges relating to power sales totaled
$39 million
of net unrealized gains. Approximately
$30 million
is expected to be reclassified from AOCI to operating revenues in the next twelve months. The actual amount reclassified from AOCI, however, could vary due to future changes in market prices.
64
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
Entergy may effectively liquidate a cash flow hedge instrument by entering into a contract offsetting the original hedge, and then de-designating the original hedge in this situation. Gains or losses accumulated in other comprehensive income prior to de-designation continue to be deferred in other comprehensive income until they are included in income as the original hedged transaction occurs. From the point of de-designation, the gains or losses on the original hedge and the offsetting contract are recorded as assets or liabilities on the balance sheet and offset as they flow through to earnings.
The effects of Entergy’s derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments on the consolidated income statements for the three months ended
June 30, 2017
and
2016
are as follows:
Instrument
Amount of loss recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income
Income Statement
location
Amount of gain (loss)
recorded in the income statement
(In Millions)
(In Millions)
2017
Natural gas swaps
$—
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
(a)
($9)
FTRs
$—
Purchased power expense
(b)
$44
Electricity swaps and options
($5)
(c)
Competitive business operating revenues
$—
2016
Natural gas swaps
$—
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
(a)
($6)
FTRs
$—
Purchased power expense
(b)
$38
Electricity swaps and options
($10)
(c)
Competitive business operating revenues
($6)
65
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
The effects of Entergy’s derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments on the consolidated income statements for the six months ended
June 30, 2017
and
2016
are as follows:
Instrument
Amount of gain recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income
Income Statement
location
Amount of gain (loss)
recorded in the income statement
(In Millions)
(In Millions)
2017
Natural gas swaps
$—
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
(a)
($16)
Financial transmission rights
$—
Purchased power expense
(b)
$75
Electricity swaps and options
$4
(c)
Competitive business operating revenues
$—
2016
Natural gas swaps
$—
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
(a)
($30)
Financial transmission rights
$—
Purchased power expense
(b)
$59
Electricity swaps and options
$15
(c)
Competitive business operating revenues
($9)
(a)
Due to regulatory treatment, the natural gas swaps are marked-to-market through fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale and then such amounts are simultaneously reversed and recorded as an offsetting regulatory asset or liability. The gains or losses recorded as fuel expenses when the swaps are settled are recovered or refunded through fuel cost recovery mechanisms.
(b)
Due to regulatory treatment, the changes in the estimated fair value of financial transmission rights for the Utility operating companies are recorded through purchased power expense and then such amounts are simultaneously reversed and recorded as an offsetting regulatory asset or liability. The gains or losses recorded as purchased power expense when the financial transmission rights for the Utility operating companies are settled are recovered or refunded through fuel cost recovery mechanisms.
(c)
Amount of gain (loss) recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income from electricity swaps and options de-designated as hedged items.
66
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
The fair values of the Registrant Subsidiaries’ derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments on their balance sheets as of
June 30, 2017
are as follows:
Instrument
Balance Sheet Location
Fair Value (a)
Registrant
(In Millions)
Assets:
Financial transmission rights
Prepayments and other
$8.3
Entergy Arkansas
Financial transmission rights
Prepayments and other
$28.3
Entergy Louisiana
Financial transmission rights
Prepayments and other
$9.1
Entergy Mississippi
Financial transmission rights
Prepayments and other
$5.2
Entergy New Orleans
Financial transmission rights
Prepayments and other
$5.5
Entergy Texas
Liabilities:
Natural gas swaps
Other current liabilities
$4.5
Entergy Louisiana
Natural gas swaps
Other current liabilities
$0.8
Entergy Mississippi
The fair values of the Registrant Subsidiaries’ derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments on their balance sheets as of
December 31, 2016
are as follows:
Instrument
Balance Sheet Location
Fair Value (a)
Registrant
(In Millions)
Assets:
Natural gas swaps
Prepayments and other
$10.9
Entergy Louisiana
Natural gas swaps
Prepayments and other
$2.3
Entergy Mississippi
Natural gas swaps
Prepayments and other
$0.2
Entergy New Orleans
Financial transmission rights
Prepayments and other
$5.4
Entergy Arkansas
Financial transmission rights
Prepayments and other
$8.5
Entergy Louisiana
Financial transmission rights
Prepayments and other
$3.2
Entergy Mississippi
Financial transmission rights
Prepayments and other
$1.1
Entergy New Orleans
Financial transmission rights
Prepayments and other
$3.1
Entergy Texas
(a)
As of June 30, 2017, letters of credit posted with MISO covered financial transmission rights exposure of
$0.3 million
for Entergy Arkansas and
$0.1 million
for Entergy Mississippi. As of December 31, 2016, letters of credit posted with MISO covered financial transmission rights exposure of
$0.3 million
for Entergy Arkansas and
$0.1 million
for Entergy Mississippi.
67
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
The effects of the Registrant Subsidiaries’ derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments on their income statements for the three months ended
June 30, 2017
and
2016
are as follows:
Instrument
Income Statement Location
Amount of gain
(loss) recorded
in the income statement
Registrant
(In Millions)
2017
Natural gas swaps
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
($7.6)
(a)
Entergy Louisiana
Natural gas swaps
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
($1.4)
(a)
Entergy Mississippi
FTRs
Purchased power expense
$10.5
(b)
Entergy Arkansas
FTRs
Purchased power expense
$14.3
(b)
Entergy Louisiana
FTRs
Purchased power expense
$8.5
(b)
Entergy Mississippi
FTRs
Purchased power expense
$3.4
(b)
Entergy New Orleans
FTRs
Purchased power expense
$6.9
(b)
Entergy Texas
2016
Natural gas swaps
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
($4.9)
(a)
Entergy Louisiana
Natural gas swaps
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
($0.9)
(a)
Entergy Mississippi
FTRs
Purchased power expense
$5.5
(b)
Entergy Arkansas
FTRs
Purchased power expense
$21.6
(b)
Entergy Louisiana
FTRs
Purchased power expense
$3.6
(b)
Entergy Mississippi
FTRs
Purchased power expense
$1.4
(b)
Entergy New Orleans
FTRs
Purchased power expense
$5.4
(b)
Entergy Texas
68
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
The effects of the Registrant Subsidiaries’ derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments on their income statements for the six months ended
June 30, 2017
and
2016
are as follows:
Instrument
Income Statement Location
Amount of gain
(loss) recorded
in the income statement
Registrant
(In Millions)
2017
Natural gas swaps
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
($13.7)
(a)
Entergy Louisiana
Natural gas swaps
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
($2.5)
(a)
Entergy Mississippi
Natural gas swaps
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
($0.1)
(a)
Entergy New Orleans
Financial transmission rights
Purchased power expense
$15.1
(b)
Entergy Arkansas
Financial transmission rights
Purchased power expense
$29.5
(b)
Entergy Louisiana
Financial transmission rights
Purchased power expense
$11.6
(b)
Entergy Mississippi
Financial transmission rights
Purchased power expense
$5.7
(b)
Entergy New Orleans
Financial transmission rights
Purchased power expense
$12.1
(b)
Entergy Texas
2016
Natural gas swaps
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
($24.2)
(a)
Entergy Louisiana
Natural gas swaps
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
($5.0)
(a)
Entergy Mississippi
Natural gas swaps
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
($0.5)
(a)
Entergy New Orleans
Financial transmission rights
Purchased power expense
$13.3
(b)
Entergy Arkansas
Financial transmission rights
Purchased power expense
$32.1
(b)
Entergy Louisiana
Financial transmission rights
Purchased power expense
$4.4
(b)
Entergy Mississippi
Financial transmission rights
Purchased power expense
$1.9
(b)
Entergy New Orleans
Financial transmission rights
Purchased power expense
$6.9
(b)
Entergy Texas
(a)
Due to regulatory treatment, the natural gas swaps are marked-to-market through fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale and then such amounts are simultaneously reversed and recorded as an offsetting regulatory asset or liability. The gains or losses recorded as fuel expenses when the swaps are settled are recovered or refunded through fuel cost recovery mechanisms.
(b)
Due to regulatory treatment, the changes in the estimated fair value of financial transmission rights for the Utility operating companies are recorded through purchased power expense and then such amounts are
69
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
simultaneously reversed and recorded as an offsetting regulatory asset or liability. The gains or losses recorded as purchased power expense when the financial transmission rights for the Utility operating companies are settled are recovered or refunded through fuel cost recovery mechanisms.
Fair Values
The estimated fair values of Entergy’s financial instruments and derivatives are determined using historical prices, bid prices, market quotes, and financial modeling. Considerable judgment is required in developing the estimates of fair value. Therefore, estimates are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that Entergy could realize in a current market exchange. Gains or losses realized on financial instruments other than those instruments held by the Entergy Wholesale Commodities business are reflected in future rates and therefore do not affect net income. Entergy considers the carrying amounts of most financial instruments classified as current assets and liabilities to be a reasonable estimate of their fair value because of the short maturity of these instruments.
Accounting standards define fair value as an exit price, or the price that would be received to sell an asset or the amount that would be paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between knowledgeable market participants at the date of measurement. Entergy and the Registrant Subsidiaries use assumptions or market input data that market participants would use in pricing assets or liabilities at fair value. The inputs can be readily observable, corroborated by market data, or generally unobservable. Entergy and the Registrant Subsidiaries endeavor to use the best available information to determine fair value.
Accounting standards establish a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. The hierarchy establishes the highest priority for unadjusted market quotes in an active market for the identical asset or liability and the lowest priority for unobservable inputs.
The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are:
•
Level 1 - Level 1 inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the entity has the ability to access at the measurement date. Active markets are those in which transactions for the asset or liability occur in sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis. Level 1 primarily consists of individually owned common stocks, cash equivalents (temporary cash investments, securitization recovery trust account, and escrow accounts), debt instruments, and gas hedge contracts. Cash equivalents includes all unrestricted highly liquid debt instruments with an original or remaining maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase.
•
Level 2 - Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are, either directly or indirectly, observable for the asset or liability at the measurement date. Assets are valued based on prices derived by independent third parties that use inputs such as benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes, and issuer spreads. Prices are reviewed and can be challenged with the independent parties and/or overridden by Entergy if it is believed such would be more reflective of fair value. Level 2 inputs include the following:
–
quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets;
–
quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in inactive markets;
–
inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability; or
–
inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.
Level 2 consists primarily of individually-owned debt instruments.
•
Level 3 - Level 3 inputs are pricing inputs that are generally less observable or unobservable from objective sources. These inputs are used with internally developed methodologies to produce management’s best
70
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
estimate of fair value for the asset or liability. Level 3 consists primarily of financial transmission rights and derivative power contracts used as cash flow hedges of power sales at merchant power plants.
The values for power contract assets or liabilities are based on both observable inputs including public market prices and interest rates, and unobservable inputs such as implied volatilities, unit contingent discounts, expected basis differences, and credit adjusted counterparty interest rates. They are classified as Level 3 assets and liabilities. The valuations of these assets and liabilities are performed by the Business Unit Risk Control group and the Accounting Policy and Entergy Wholesale Commodities Accounting group. The primary functions of the Business Unit Risk Control group include: gathering, validating and reporting market data, providing market risk analyses and valuations in support of Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ commercial transactions, developing and administering protocols for the management of market risks, and implementing and maintaining controls around changes to market data in the energy trading and risk management system. The Business Unit Risk Control group is also responsible for managing the energy trading and risk management system, forecasting revenues, forward positions and analysis. The Accounting Policy and Entergy Wholesale Commodities Accounting group performs functions related to market and counterparty settlements, revenue reporting and analysis and financial accounting. The Business Unit Risk Control group reports to the Vice President and Treasurer while the Accounting Policy and Entergy Wholesale Commodities Accounting group reports to the Chief Accounting Officer.
The amounts reflected as the fair value of electricity swaps are based on the estimated amount that the contracts are in-the-money at the balance sheet date (treated as an asset) or out-of-the-money at the balance sheet date (treated as a liability) and would equal the estimated amount receivable to or payable by Entergy if the contracts were settled at that date. These derivative contracts include cash flow hedges that swap fixed for floating cash flows for sales of the output from the Entergy Wholesale Commodities business. The fair values are based on the mark-to-market comparison between the fixed contract prices and the floating prices determined each period from quoted forward power market prices. The differences between the fixed price in the swap contract and these market-related prices multiplied by the volume specified in the contract and discounted at the counterparties’ credit adjusted risk free rate are recorded as derivative contract assets or liabilities. For contracts that have unit contingent terms, a further discount is applied based on the historical relationship between contract and market prices for similar contract terms.
The amounts reflected as the fair values of electricity options are valued based on a Black Scholes model, and are calculated at the end of each month for accounting purposes. Inputs to the valuation include end of day forward market prices for the period when the transactions will settle, implied volatilities based on market volatilities provided by a third party data aggregator, and U.S. Treasury rates for a risk-free return rate. As described further below, prices and implied volatilities are reviewed and can be adjusted if it is determined that there is a better representation of fair value.
On a daily basis, the Business Unit Risk Control group calculates the mark-to-market for electricity swaps and options. The Business Unit Risk Control group also validates forward market prices by comparing them to other sources of forward market prices or to settlement prices of actual market transactions. Significant differences are analyzed and potentially adjusted based on these other sources of forward market prices or settlement prices of actual market transactions. Implied volatilities used to value options are also validated using actual counterparty quotes for Entergy Wholesale Commodities transactions when available and compared with other sources of market implied volatilities. Moreover, on at least a monthly basis, the Office of Corporate Risk Oversight confirms the mark-to-market calculations and prepares price scenarios and credit downgrade scenario analysis. The scenario analysis is communicated to senior management within Entergy and within Entergy Wholesale Commodities. Finally, for all proposed derivative transactions, an analysis is completed to assess the risk of adding the proposed derivative to Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ portfolio. In particular, the credit and liquidity effects are calculated for this analysis. This analysis is communicated to senior management within Entergy and Entergy Wholesale Commodities.
The values of financial transmission rights are based on unobservable inputs, including estimates of congestion costs in MISO between applicable generation and load pricing nodes based on the 50th percentile of historical prices. They are classified as Level 3 assets and liabilities. The valuations of these assets and liabilities are performed by the
71
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
Business Unit Risk Control group. The values are calculated internally and verified against the data published by MISO. Entergy’s Accounting Policy and Entergy Wholesale Commodities Accounting group reviews these valuations for reasonableness, with the assistance of others within the organization with knowledge of the various inputs and assumptions used in the valuation. The Business Unit Risk Control groups report to the Vice President and Treasurer. The Accounting Policy and Entergy Wholesale Commodities Accounting group reports to the Chief Accounting Officer.
The following tables set forth, by level within the fair value hierarchy, Entergy’s assets and liabilities that are accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of
June 30, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
. The assessment of the significance of a particular input to a fair value measurement requires judgment and may affect its placement within the fair value hierarchy levels.
2017
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
(In Millions)
Assets:
Temporary cash investments
$867
$—
$—
$867
Decommissioning trust funds (a):
Equity securities
469
—
—
469
Debt securities
1,032
1,376
—
2,408
Common trusts (b)
3,920
Power contracts
—
—
40
40
Securitization recovery trust account
36
—
—
36
Escrow accounts
416
—
—
416
Financial transmission rights
—
—
57
57
$2,820
$1,376
$97
$8,213
Liabilities:
Power contracts
$—
$—
$2
$2
Gas hedge contracts
5
—
—
5
$5
$—
$2
$7
2016
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
(In Millions)
Assets:
Temporary cash investments
$1,058
$—
$—
$1,058
Decommissioning trust funds (a):
Equity securities
480
—
—
480
Debt securities
985
1,228
—
2,213
Common trusts (b)
3,031
Power contracts
—
—
16
16
Securitization recovery trust account
46
—
—
46
Escrow accounts
433
—
—
433
Gas hedge contracts
13
—
—
13
Financial transmission rights
—
—
21
21
$3,015
$1,228
$37
$7,311
Liabilities:
Power contracts
$—
$—
$11
$11
(a)
The decommissioning trust funds hold equity and fixed income securities. Equity securities are invested to approximate the returns of major market indices. Fixed income securities are held in various governmental and corporate securities. See Note 9 to the financial statements for additional information on the investment portfolios.
72
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
(b)
Common trust funds are not publicly quoted, and are valued by the fund administrators using net asset value as a practical expedient. Accordingly, these funds are not assigned a level in the fair value table. The fund administrator of these investments allows daily trading at the net asset value and trades settle at a later date.
The following table sets forth a reconciliation of changes in the net assets (liabilities) for the fair value of derivatives classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy for the three months ended
June 30, 2017
and
2016
:
2017
2016
Power Contracts
Financial transmission rights
Power Contracts
Financial transmission rights
(In Millions)
Balance as of April 1,
$5
$8
$183
$9
Total gains (losses) for the period (a)
Included in earnings
4
—
(9
)
—
Included in OCI
43
—
(53
)
—
Included as a regulatory liability/asset
—
31
—
20
Issuances of FTRs
—
62
—
55
Purchases
—
—
—
—
Settlements
(14
)
(44
)
(55
)
(38
)
Balance as of June 30,
$38
$57
$66
$46
(a)
Change in unrealized gains or losses for the period included in earnings for derivatives held at the end of the reporting period is
($0.1) million
for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and
($6) million
for the three months ended June 30, 2016.
The following table sets forth a reconciliation of changes in the net assets (liabilities) for the fair value of derivatives classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy for the
six months ended
June 30, 2017
and
2016
:
2017
2016
Power Contracts
Financial transmission rights
Power Contracts
Financial transmission rights
(In Millions)
Balance as of January 1,
$5
$21
$189
$23
Total gains (losses) for the period (a)
Included in earnings
4
—
(9
)
—
Included in OCI
93
—
86
—
Included as a regulatory liability/asset
—
48
—
27
Issuances of financial transmission rights
—
62
—
55
Purchases
—
—
—
—
Settlements
(64
)
(74
)
(200
)
(59
)
Balance as of June 30,
$38
$57
$66
$46
(a)
Change in unrealized gains or losses for the period included in earnings for derivatives held at the end of the reporting period is
$0.3 million
for the six months ended June 30, 2017. For the six months ended June 30, 2016, there is no change in unrealized gains or losses included in earnings for derivatives held at the end of the reporting period.
73
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
The
following
table sets forth a description of the types of transactions classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy and significant unobservable inputs to each which cause that classification as of
June 30, 2017
:
Transaction Type
Fair Value
as of
June 30, 2017
Significant
Unobservable Inputs
Range
from
Average
%
Effect on
Fair Value
(In Millions)
(In Millions)
Power contracts - electricity swaps
$38
Unit contingent discount
+/-
4%
$3
The following table sets forth an analysis of each of the types of unobservable inputs impacting the fair value of items classified as Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy, and the sensitivity to changes to those inputs:
Significant
Unobservable
Input
Transaction Type
Position
Change to Input
Effect on
Fair Value
Unit contingent discount
Electricity swaps
Sell
Increase (Decrease)
Decrease (Increase)
The following table sets forth, by level within the fair value hierarchy, the Registrant Subsidiaries’ assets that are accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of
June 30, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
. The assessment of the significance of a particular input to a fair value measurement requires judgment and may affect its placement within the fair value hierarchy levels.
Entergy Arkansas
2017
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
(In Millions)
Assets:
Decommissioning trust funds (a):
Equity securities
$10.7
$—
$—
$10.7
Debt securities
129.7
198.3
—
328.0
Common trusts (b)
545.6
Securitization recovery trust account
3.6
—
—
3.6
Escrow accounts
4.7
—
—
4.7
Financial transmission rights
—
—
8.3
8.3
$148.7
$198.3
$8.3
$900.9
2016
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
(In Millions)
Assets:
Decommissioning trust funds (a):
Equity securities
$3.6
$—
$—
$3.6
Debt securities
112.5
196.8
—
309.3
Common trusts (b)
521.8
Securitization recovery trust account
4.1
—
—
4.1
Escrow accounts
7.1
—
—
7.1
Financial transmission rights
—
—
5.4
5.4
$127.3
$196.8
$5.4
$851.3
74
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
Entergy Louisiana
2017
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
(In Millions)
Assets:
Temporary cash investments
$211.9
$—
$—
$211.9
Decommissioning trust funds (a):
Equity securities
11.2
—
—
11.2
Debt securities
137.5
326.6
—
464.1
Common trusts (b)
745.4
Escrow accounts
292.9
—
—
292.9
Securitization recovery trust account
2.8
—
—
2.8
Financial transmission rights
—
—
28.3
28.3
$656.3
$326.6
$28.3
$1,756.6
Liabilities:
Gas hedge contracts
$4.5
$—
$—
$4.5
2016
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
(In Millions)
Assets:
Temporary cash investments
$163.9
$—
$—
$163.9
Decommissioning trust funds (a):
Equity securities
13.9
—
—
13.9
Debt securities
132.3
292.5
—
424.8
Common trusts (b)
702.0
Escrow accounts
305.7
—
—
305.7
Securitization recovery trust account
2.8
—
—
2.8
Gas hedge contracts
10.9
—
—
10.9
Financial transmission rights
—
—
8.5
8.5
$629.5
$292.5
$8.5
$1,632.5
Entergy Mississippi
2017
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
(In Millions)
Assets:
Escrow accounts
$31.9
$—
$—
$31.9
Financial transmission rights
—
—
9.1
9.1
$31.9
$—
$9.1
$41.0
Liabilities:
Gas hedge contracts
$0.8
$—
$—
$0.8
75
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
2016
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
(In Millions)
Assets:
Temporary cash investments
$76.8
$—
$—
$76.8
Escrow accounts
31.8
—
—
31.8
Gas hedge contracts
2.3
—
—
2.3
Financial transmission rights
—
—
3.2
3.2
$110.9
$—
$3.2
$114.1
Entergy New Orleans
2017
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
(In Millions)
Assets:
Temporary cash investments
$60.7
$—
$—
$60.7
Securitization recovery trust account
1.1
—
—
1.1
Escrow accounts
86.4
—
—
86.4
Financial transmission rights
—
—
5.2
5.2
$148.2
$—
$5.2
$153.4
2016
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
(In Millions)
Assets:
Temporary cash investments
$103.0
$—
$—
$103.0
Securitization recovery trust account
1.7
—
—
1.7
Escrow accounts
88.6
—
—
88.6
Gas hedge contracts
0.2
—
—
0.2
Financial transmission rights
—
—
1.1
1.1
$193.5
$—
$1.1
$194.6
Entergy Texas
2017
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
(In Millions)
Assets
:
Securitization recovery trust account
$28.7
$—
$—
$28.7
Financial transmission rights
—
—
5.5
5.5
$28.7
$—
$5.5
$34.2
2016
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
(In Millions)
Assets
:
Temporary cash investments
$5.0
$—
$—
$5.0
Securitization recovery trust account
37.5
—
—
37.5
Financial transmission rights
—
—
3.1
3.1
$42.5
$—
$3.1
$45.6
76
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
System Energy
2017
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
(In Millions)
Assets:
Temporary cash investments
$337.0
$—
$—
$337.0
Decommissioning trust funds (a):
Equity securities
1.6
—
—
1.6
Debt securities
208.9
113.6
—
322.5
Common trusts (b)
515.3
$547.5
$113.6
$—
$1,176.4
2016
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
(In Millions)
Assets:
Temporary cash investments
$245.1
$—
$—
$245.1
Decommissioning trust funds (a):
Equity securities
0.3
—
—
0.3
Debt securities
248.3
58.3
—
306.6
Common trusts (b)
473.6
$493.7
$58.3
$—
$1,025.6
(a)
The decommissioning trust funds hold equity and fixed income securities. Equity securities are invested to approximate the returns of major market indices. Fixed income securities are held in various governmental and corporate securities. See Note 9 to the financial statements for additional information on the investment portfolios.
(b)
Common trust funds are not publicly quoted, and are valued by the fund administrators using net asset value as a practical expedient. Accordingly, these funds are not assigned a level in the fair value table. The fund administrator of these investments allows daily trading at the net asset value and trades settle at a later date.
The following table sets forth a reconciliation of changes in the net assets (liabilities) for the fair value of derivatives classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy for the three months ended June 30, 2017.
Entergy
Arkansas
Entergy
Louisiana
Entergy
Mississippi
Entergy
New
Orleans
Entergy
Texas
(In Millions)
Balance as of April 1,
$0.9
$4.1
$1.3
$0.5
$1.0
Issuances of FTRs
8.9
31.0
9.6
5.0
7.1
Gains included as a regulatory liability/asset
9.0
7.5
6.7
3.1
4.3
Settlements
(10.5
)
(14.3
)
(8.5
)
(3.4
)
(6.9
)
Balance as of June 30,
$8.3
$28.3
$9.1
$5.2
$5.5
77
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
The following table sets forth a reconciliation of changes in the net assets (liabilities) for the fair value of derivatives classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy for the three months ended June 30, 2016.
Entergy
Arkansas
Entergy
Louisiana
Entergy
Mississippi
Entergy
New
Orleans
Entergy
Texas
(In Millions)
Balance as of April 1,
$3.7
$3.3
$0.9
$0.6
$0.9
Issuances of FTRs
18.8
18.1
5.9
2.8
9.3
Gains (losses) included as a regulatory liability/asset
(3.0
)
16.4
2.4
—
3.2
Settlements
(5.5
)
(21.6
)
(3.6
)
(1.4
)
(5.4
)
Balance as of June 30,
$14.0
$16.2
$5.6
$2.0
$8.0
The following table sets forth a reconciliation of changes in the net assets (liabilities) for the fair value of derivatives classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy for the
six months ended June 30, 2017
.
Entergy
Arkansas
Entergy
Louisiana
Entergy
Mississippi
Entergy
New
Orleans
Entergy
Texas
(In Millions)
Balance as of January 1,
$5.4
$8.5
$3.2
$1.1
$3.1
Issuances of FTRs
8.9
31.0
9.6
5.0
7.1
Gains included as a regulatory liability/asset
9.1
18.3
7.9
4.8
7.4
Settlements
(15.1
)
(29.5
)
(11.6
)
(5.7
)
(12.1
)
Balance as of June 30,
$8.3
$28.3
$9.1
$5.2
$5.5
The following table sets forth a reconciliation of changes in the net assets (liabilities) for the fair value of derivatives classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy for the
six months ended June 30, 2016
.
Entergy
Arkansas
Entergy
Louisiana
Entergy
Mississippi
Entergy
New
Orleans
Entergy
Texas
(In Millions)
Balance as of January 1,
$7.9
$8.5
$2.4
$1.5
$2.2
Issuances of FTRs
18.8
18.1
5.9
2.8
9.3
Gains (losses) included as a regulatory liability/asset
0.6
21.7
1.7
(0.4
)
3.4
Settlements
(13.3
)
(32.1
)
(4.4
)
(1.9
)
(6.9
)
Balance as of June 30,
$14.0
$16.2
$5.6
$2.0
$8.0
NOTE 9. DECOMMISSIONING TRUST FUNDS (Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, and System Energy)
Entergy holds debt and equity securities, classified as available-for-sale, in nuclear decommissioning trust accounts. The NRC requires Entergy subsidiaries to maintain trusts to fund the costs of decommissioning ANO 1, ANO 2, River Bend, Waterford 3, Grand Gulf, Pilgrim, Indian Point 1, Indian Point 2, Indian Point 3, Vermont Yankee,
78
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
and Palisades. The funds are invested primarily in equity securities, fixed-rate debt securities, and cash and cash equivalents.
See Note 16 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of the trust transfer agreement with NYPA to transfer the decommissioning trust funds and decommissioning liabilities for the Indian Point 3 and FitzPatrick plants to Entergy. In January 2017, NYPA transferred to Entergy the Indian Point 3 decommissioning trust fund with a fair value of
$726 million
and the FitzPatrick decommissioning trust fund with a fair value of
$793 million
.
As discussed in Note 13 to the financial statements herein, in March 2017, Entergy closed on the sale of the FitzPatrick plant to Exelon. As part of the transaction, Entergy transferred the FitzPatrick decommissioning trust fund to Exelon. The FitzPatrick decommissioning trust fund had a disposition-date fair value of
$805 million
and was classified as held for sale within other deferred debits as of December 31, 2016.
Entergy records decommissioning trust funds on the balance sheet at their fair value. Because of the ability of the Registrant Subsidiaries to recover decommissioning costs in rates and in accordance with the regulatory treatment for decommissioning trust funds, the Registrant Subsidiaries have recorded an offsetting amount of unrealized gains/(losses) on investment securities in other regulatory liabilities/assets. For the
30%
interest in River Bend formerly owned by Cajun, Entergy Louisiana has recorded an offsetting amount of unrealized gains/(losses) in other deferred credits. Decommissioning trust funds for Pilgrim, Indian Point 1, Indian Point 2, Indian Point 3, Vermont Yankee, and Palisades do not meet the criteria for regulatory accounting treatment. Accordingly, unrealized gains recorded on the assets in these trust funds are recognized in the accumulated other comprehensive income component of shareholders’ equity because these assets are classified as available-for-sale. Unrealized losses (where cost exceeds fair market value) on the assets in these trust funds are also recorded in the accumulated other comprehensive income component of shareholders’ equity unless the unrealized loss is other-than-temporary and therefore recorded in earnings. Generally, Entergy records realized gains and losses on its debt and equity securities using the specific identification method to determine the cost basis of its securities.
The securities held as of
June 30, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
are summarized as follows:
Fair
Value
Total
Unrealized
Gains
Total
Unrealized
Losses
(In Millions)
2017
Equity Securities
$4,389
$1,857
$1
Debt Securities
2,408
45
15
Total
$6,797
$1,902
$16
Fair
Value
Total
Unrealized
Gains
Total
Unrealized
Losses
(In Millions)
2016
Equity Securities
$3,511
$1,673
$1
Debt Securities
2,213
34
27
Total
$5,724
$1,707
$28
The fair values of the decommissioning trust funds related to the Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear plants as of
June 30, 2017
are
$465 million
for Indian Point 1,
$591 million
for Indian Point 2,
$758 million
for Indian Point 3,
$434 million
for Palisades,
$1,010 million
for Pilgrim, and
$595 million
for Vermont Yankee. The fair values of the decommissioning trust funds for the Registrant Subsidiaries’ nuclear plants are detailed below.
79
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
Deferred taxes on unrealized gains/(losses) are recorded in other comprehensive income for the decommissioning trusts which do not meet the criteria for regulatory accounting treatment as described above. Unrealized gains/(losses) above are reported before deferred taxes of
$441 million
and
$399 million
as of
June 30, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
, respectively. The amortized cost of debt securities was
$2,378 million
as of
June 30, 2017
and
$2,212 million
as of
December 31, 2016
. As of
June 30, 2017
, the debt securities have an average coupon rate of approximately
3.21%
, an average duration of approximately
6.14
years, and an average maturity of approximately
9.96
years. The equity securities are generally held in funds that are designed to approximate or somewhat exceed the return of the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index. A relatively small percentage of the equity securities are held in funds intended to replicate the return of the Wilshire 4500 Index or the Russell 3000 Index.
The fair value and gross unrealized losses of available-for-sale equity and debt securities, summarized by investment type and length of time that the securities have been in a continuous loss position, are as follows as of
June 30, 2017
:
Equity Securities
Debt Securities
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
(In Millions)
Less than 12 months
$2
$1
$997
$12
More than 12 months
—
—
47
3
Total
$2
$1
$1,044
$15
The fair value and gross unrealized losses of available-for-sale equity and debt securities, summarized by investment type and length of time that the securities have been in a continuous loss position, are as follows as of
December 31, 2016
:
Equity Securities
Debt Securities
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
(In Millions)
Less than 12 months
$23
$1
$1,169
$26
More than 12 months
1
—
20
1
Total
$24
$1
$1,189
$27
The fair value of debt securities, summarized by contractual maturities, as of
June 30, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
are as follows:
2017
2016
(In Millions)
less than 1 year
$106
$125
1 year - 5 years
805
763
5 years - 10 years
795
719
10 years - 15 years
111
109
15 years - 20 years
88
73
20 years+
503
424
Total
$2,408
$2,213
During the
three months ended
June 30, 2017
and
2016
, proceeds from the dispositions of securities amounted to
$949 million
and
$504 million
, respectively. During the
three months ended
June 30, 2017
and
2016
, gross gains
80
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
of
$61 million
and
$10 million
, respectively, and gross losses of
$2 million
and
$2 million
, respectively, were reclassified out of other comprehensive income or other regulatory liabilities/assets into earnings.
During the
six months ended
June 30, 2017
and
2016
, proceeds from the dispositions of securities amounted to
$1,463 million
and
$1,233 million
, respectively. During the
six months ended
June 30, 2017
and
2016
, gross gains of
$70 million
and
$20 million
, respectively, and gross losses of
$7 million
and
$5 million
, respectively, were reclassified out of other comprehensive income or other regulatory liabilities/assets into earnings.
Entergy Arkansas
Entergy Arkansas holds debt and equity securities, classified as available-for-sale, in nuclear decommissioning trust accounts. The securities held as of
June 30, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
are summarized as follows:
Fair
Value
Total
Unrealized
Gains
Total
Unrealized
Losses
(In Millions)
2017
Equity Securities
$556.3
$308.0
$—
Debt Securities
328.0
3.3
2.3
Total
$884.3
$311.3
$2.3
2016
Equity Securities
$525.4
$281.5
$—
Debt Securities
309.3
3.4
4.2
Total
$834.7
$284.9
$4.2
The amortized cost of debt securities was
$327 million
as of
June 30, 2017
and
$310.1 million
as of
December 31, 2016
. As of
June 30, 2017
, the debt securities have an average coupon rate of approximately
2.53%
, an average duration of approximately
5.83
years, and an average maturity of approximately
6.87
years. The equity securities are generally held in funds that are designed to approximate the return of the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index. A relatively small percentage of the equity securities are held in funds intended to replicate the return of the Wilshire 4500 Index.
The fair value and gross unrealized losses of available-for-sale equity and debt securities, summarized by investment type and length of time that the securities have been in a continuous loss position, are as follows as of
June 30, 2017
:
Equity Securities
Debt Securities
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
(In Millions)
Less than 12 months
$—
$—
$118.1
$1.7
More than 12 months
—
—
10.1
0.6
Total
$—
$—
$128.2
$2.3
81
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
The fair value and gross unrealized losses of available-for-sale equity and debt securities, summarized by investment type and length of time that the securities have been in a continuous loss position, are as follows as of
December 31, 2016
:
Equity Securities
Debt Securities
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
(In Millions)
Less than 12 months
$—
$—
$146.7
$4.2
More than 12 months
—
—
—
—
Total
$—
$—
$146.7
$4.2
The fair value of debt securities, summarized by contractual maturities, as of
June 30, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
are as follows:
2017
2016
(In Millions)
less than 1 year
$16.8
$16.7
1 year - 5 years
102.6
106.2
5 years - 10 years
183.5
161.2
10 years - 15 years
4.4
7.7
15 years - 20 years
1.1
1.0
20 years+
19.6
16.5
Total
$328.0
$309.3
During the
three months ended
June 30, 2017
and
2016
, proceeds from the dispositions of securities amounted to
$131.3 million
and
$45.2 million
, respectively. During the
three months ended
June 30, 2017
and
2016
, gross gains of
$11.2 million
and
$0.4 million
, respectively, and gross losses of
$0.1 million
and
$0.2 million
, respectively were reclassified out of other regulatory liabilities/assets into earnings.
During the
six months ended
June 30, 2017
and
2016
, proceeds from the dispositions of securities amounted to
$167.3 million
and
$103.8 million
, respectively. During the
six months ended
June 30, 2017
and
2016
, gross gains of
$11.7 million
and
$1.2 million
, respectively, and gross losses of
$0.2 million
and
$0.3 million
, respectively were reclassified out of other regulatory liabilities/assets into earnings.
82
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
Entergy Louisiana
Entergy Louisiana holds debt and equity securities, classified as available-for-sale, in nuclear decommissioning trust accounts. The securities held as of
June 30, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
are summarized as follows:
Fair
Value
Total
Unrealized
Gains
Total
Unrealized
Losses
(In Millions)
2017
Equity Securities
$756.6
$395.6
$—
Debt Securities
464.1
10.9
2.9
Total
$1,220.7
$406.5
$2.9
2016
Equity Securities
$715.9
$346.6
$—
Debt Securities
424.8
8.0
5.0
Total
$1,140.7
$354.6
$5.0
The amortized cost of debt securities was
$456.1 million
as of
June 30, 2017
and
$421.9 million
as of
December 31, 2016
. As of
June 30, 2017
, the debt securities have an average coupon rate of approximately
3.79%
, an average duration of approximately
5.8
years, and an average maturity of approximately
11.49
years. The equity securities are generally held in funds that are designed to approximate the return of the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index. A relatively small percentage of the equity securities are held in funds intended to replicate the return of the Wilshire 4500 Index.
The fair value and gross unrealized losses of available-for-sale equity and debt securities, summarized by investment type and length of time that the securities have been in a continuous loss position, are as follows as of
June 30, 2017
:
Equity Securities
Debt Securities
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
(In Millions)
Less than 12 months
$—
$—
$164.4
$2.4
More than 12 months
—
—
9.7
0.5
Total
$—
$—
$174.1
$2.9
The fair value and gross unrealized losses of available-for-sale equity and debt securities, summarized by investment type and length of time that the securities have been in a continuous loss position, are as follows as of
December 31, 2016
:
Equity Securities
Debt Securities
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
(In Millions)
Less than 12 months
$—
$—
$198.8
$4.8
More than 12 months
—
—
4.8
0.2
Total
$—
$—
$203.6
$5.0
83
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
The fair value of debt securities, summarized by contractual maturities, as of
June 30, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
are as follows:
2017
2016
(In Millions)
less than 1 year
$28.5
$31.4
1 year - 5 years
105.2
99.1
5 years - 10 years
131.9
122.8
10 years - 15 years
44.3
41.4
15 years - 20 years
38.6
30.9
20 years+
115.6
99.2
Total
$464.1
$424.8
During the
three months ended
June 30, 2017
and
2016
, proceeds from the dispositions of securities amounted to
$85 million
and
$69.7 million
, respectively. During the
three months ended
June 30, 2017
and
2016
, gross gains of
$5 million
and
$1.7 million
, respectively, and gross losses of
$0.1 million
and
$0.04 million
, respectively, were reclassified out of other regulatory liabilities/assets into earnings.
During the
six months ended
June 30, 2017
and
2016
, proceeds from the dispositions of securities amounted to
$125.6 million
and
$123.5 million
, respectively. During the
six months ended
June 30, 2017
and
2016
, gross gains of
$5 million
and
$2.6 million
, respectively, and gross losses of
$0.3 million
and
$0.1 million
, respectively, were reclassified out of other regulatory liabilities/assets into earnings.
System Energy
System Energy holds debt and equity securities, classified as available-for-sale, in nuclear decommissioning trust accounts. The securities held as of
June 30, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
are summarized as follows:
Fair
Value
Total
Unrealized
Gains
Total
Unrealized
Losses
(In Millions)
2017
Equity Securities
$516.9
$257.6
$—
Debt Securities
322.5
3.3
2.3
Total
$839.4
$260.9
$2.3
2016
Equity Securities
$473.9
$221.9
$0.1
Debt Securities
306.6
2.0
4.5
Total
$780.5
$223.9
$4.6
The amortized cost of debt securities was
$321.5 million
as of
June 30, 2017
and
$309.1 million
as of
December 31, 2016
. As of
June 30, 2017
, the debt securities have an average coupon rate of approximately
2.37%
, an average duration of approximately
6.45
years, and an average maturity of approximately
8.84
years. The equity securities are generally held in funds that are designed to approximate the return of the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index. A relatively small percentage of the equity securities are held in funds intended to replicate the return of the Wilshire 4500 Index.
84
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
The fair value and gross unrealized losses of available-for-sale equity and debt securities, summarized by investment type and length of time that the securities have been in a continuous loss position, are as follows as of
June 30, 2017
:
Equity Securities
Debt Securities
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
(In Millions)
Less than 12 months
$—
$—
$199.5
$2.0
More than 12 months
—
—
8.6
0.3
Total
$—
$—
$208.1
$2.3
The fair value and gross unrealized losses of available-for-sale equity and debt securities, summarized by investment type and length of time that the securities have been in a continuous loss position, are as follows as of
December 31, 2016
:
Equity Securities
Debt Securities
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
(In Millions)
Less than 12 months
$—
$—
$220.9
$4.4
More than 12 months
—
0.1
0.8
0.1
Total
$—
$0.1
$221.7
$4.5
The fair value of debt securities, summarized by contractual maturities, as of
June 30, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
are as follows:
2017
2016
(In Millions)
less than 1 year
$8.6
$6.6
1 year - 5 years
159.6
188.2
5 years - 10 years
86.4
78.5
10 years - 15 years
2.3
1.3
15 years - 20 years
7.8
7.8
20 years+
57.8
24.2
Total
$322.5
$306.6
During the
three months ended
June 30, 2017
and
2016
, proceeds from the dispositions of securities amounted to
$177.7 million
and
$100.9 million
, respectively. During the
three months ended
June 30, 2017
and
2016
, gross gains of
$0.4 million
and
$0.9 million
, respectively, and gross losses of
$0.6 million
and
$0.1 million
, respectively, were reclassified out of other regulatory liabilities/assets into earnings.
During the
six months ended
June 30, 2017
and
2016
, proceeds from the dispositions of securities amounted to
$253.5 million
and
$289.4 million
, respectively. During the
six months ended
June 30, 2017
and
2016
, gross gains of
$0.5 million
and
$2.5 million
, respectively, and gross losses of
$1.3 million
and
$0.4 million
, respectively, were reclassified out of other regulatory liabilities/assets into earnings.
85
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
Other-than-temporary impairments and unrealized gains and losses
Entergy evaluates investment securities in the Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ nuclear decommissioning trust funds with unrealized losses at the end of each period to determine whether an other-than-temporary impairment has occurred. The assessment of whether an investment in a debt security has suffered an other-than-temporary impairment is based on whether Entergy has the intent to sell or more likely than not will be required to sell the debt security before recovery of its amortized costs. Further, if Entergy does not expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the debt security, an other-than-temporary impairment is considered to have occurred and it is measured by the present value of cash flows expected to be collected less the amortized cost basis (credit loss). Entergy did not have any material other-than-temporary impairments relating to credit losses on debt securities for the
three
and
six months ended
June 30, 2017
and
2016
. The assessment of whether an investment in an equity security has suffered an other-than-temporary impairment is based on a number of factors including, first, whether Entergy has the ability and intent to hold the investment to recover its value, the duration and severity of any losses, and, then, whether it is expected that the investment will recover its value within a reasonable period of time. Entergy’s trusts are managed by third parties who operate in accordance with agreements that define investment guidelines and place restrictions on the purchases and sales of investments. Entergy did not record material charges to other income for the
three
and
six months ended
June 30, 2017
and
2016
, resulting from the recognition of the other-than-temporary impairment of certain equity securities held in its decommissioning trust funds.
NOTE 10. INCOME TAXES (Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy)
See “
Income Tax Audits
” and “
Other Tax Matters
” in Note 3 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of income tax audits and other income tax matters involving Entergy. The following are updates to that discussion.
As discussed in the Form 10-K, in the second quarter 2016, Entergy made a tax election to treat as a corporation for federal income tax purposes its subsidiary that owned the FitzPatrick nuclear power plant. The effect of the election was that the plant and associated assets were deemed to be contributed to a new corporation for federal income tax purposes, which created permanent and temporary differences, as discussed in the Form 10-K. One permanent difference, which increased tax expense in 2016 under the applicable accounting standards, was the reduction to the plant’s tax basis to the extent that it exceeded its fair market value. Entergy sold the FitzPatrick plant on March 31, 2017. The removal of the contingencies regarding the sale of the plant and the receipt of NRC approval for the sale allowed Entergy to re-determine the plant’s tax basis, using the closing price as indicative of a higher fair market value for the plant. The re-determined basis resulted in a
$44 million
income tax benefit in the first quarter 2017.
In the second quarter 2017, Entergy made tax elections to treat as corporations for federal income tax purposes two subsidiaries that each own an Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear power plant. This resulted in a constructive contribution of all the assets and liabilities associated with the plants to new subsidiary corporations for federal income tax purposes, and generated both permanent and temporary differences under the income tax accounting standards. The constructive contributions required the Entergy subsidiary that constructively contributed the assets and liabilities to recognize the plants’ nuclear decommissioning liabilities for income tax purposes resulting in permanent differences. The accrual of the nuclear decommissioning liabilities required Entergy to recognize a gain for income tax purposes, a portion of which resulted in an increase in tax basis of the assets constructively contributed to the subsidiaries. Recognition of the gain and the increase in tax basis of the assets represents a temporary difference. The permanent differences reduced income tax expense, net of unrecognized tax benefits, by
$373 million
.
In the first quarter 2017, Entergy implemented ASU No. 2016-09, “Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting.” Entergy will now prospectively recognize all income tax effects related to share-based payments through the income statement. In the first quarter 2017, stock option expirations, along with other stock compensation activity, resulted in the write-off of
$11.5 million
of deferred
86
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
tax assets. Entergy’s stock-based compensation plans are discussed in Note 12 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K.
NOTE 11. PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT (Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy)
Construction Expenditures in Accounts Payable
Construction expenditures included in accounts payable at
June 30, 2017
are
$198 million
for Entergy,
$47.8 million
for Entergy Arkansas,
$55.1 million
for Entergy Louisiana,
$5.3 million
for Entergy Mississippi,
$1.1 million
for Entergy New Orleans,
$15.2 million
for Entergy Texas, and
$28.1 million
for System Energy. Construction expenditures included in accounts payable at
December 31, 2016
are
$253 million
for Entergy,
$40.9 million
for Entergy Arkansas,
$114.8 million
for Entergy Louisiana,
$11.5 million
for Entergy Mississippi,
$2.3 million
for Entergy New Orleans,
$9.3 million
for Entergy Texas, and
$6.2 million
for System Energy.
NOTE 12. VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES (Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy)
See Note 17 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of variable interest entities. See Note 4 to the financial statements herein for details of the nuclear fuel companies’ credit facilities and commercial paper borrowings and long-term debt.
Entergy Louisiana was considered to hold a variable interest in the lessor from which it leased an undivided interest representing approximately
9.3%
of the Waterford 3 nuclear plant. After Entergy Louisiana acquired a beneficial interest in the leased assets in March 2016, however, the lessor was no longer considered a variable interest entity. Entergy Louisiana made payments on its lease, including interest, of
$9.2 million
through March 2016. See Note 10 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy Louisiana’s purchase of the Waterford 3 leased assets.
System Energy is considered to hold a variable interest in the lessor from which it leases an undivided interest representing approximately
11.5%
of the Grand Gulf nuclear plant. System Energy is the lessee under this arrangement, which is described in more detail in Note 10 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K. System Energy made payments on its lease, including interest, of
$8.6 million
in the six months ended
June 30, 2017
and
$8.6 million
in the six months ended
June 30, 2016
.
NOTE 13. DISPOSITIONS (Entergy Corporation)
In March 2017 the NRC approved the sale of the FitzPatrick plant, an
838
MW nuclear power plant owned by Entergy in the Entergy Wholesale Commodities segment, to Exelon. The transaction closed in March 2017 for a purchase price of
$110 million
, including the
$10 million
non-refundable signing fee paid in August 2016, in addition to the assumption by Exelon of certain liabilities related to the FitzPatrick plant, resulting in a pre-tax gain on the sale of
$16 million
. At the transaction close, Exelon paid an additional
$8 million
for the proration of certain expenses prepaid by Entergy.
As discussed in Note 10 to the financial statements herein, as a result of the sale of FitzPatrick on March 31, 2017, Entergy re-determined the plant’s tax basis, resulting in a
$44 million
income tax benefit in the first quarter 2017.
The assets and liabilities associated with the sale of FitzPatrick to Exelon were classified as held for sale on Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries’ Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2016. The disposition-date
87
Table of Contents
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements
fair value of the decommissioning trust fund was
$805 million
, classified within other deferred debits, and the disposition-date fair value of the asset retirement obligation was
$727 million
, classified within other non-current liabilities. The transaction also included property, plant, and equipment with a net book value of
zero
, materials and supplies, and prepaid assets.
As discussed in Note 14 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K, Entergy entered into a reimbursement agreement with Exelon pursuant to which Exelon reimbursed Entergy for specified out-of-pocket costs associated with Entergy’s operation of FitzPatrick. In the first quarter 2017, Entergy billed Exelon for reimbursement of
$98 million
of other operation and maintenance expenses,
$7 million
in lost operating revenues, and
$3 million
in taxes other than income taxes, partially offset by a
$10 million
defueling credit to Exelon.
NOTE 14. ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS (Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy)
See Note 9 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of asset retirement obligations. Following is an update to that discussion.
In the second quarter 2017, System Energy recorded a revision to its estimated decommissioning cost liability for Grand Gulf as a result of a revised decommissioning cost study. The revised estimate resulted in a
$35.9 million
reduction in its decommissioning cost liability, along with a corresponding reduction in the related asset retirement cost asset that will be depreciated over the remaining life of the unit.
________________
In the opinion of the management of Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy, the accompanying unaudited financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting primarily of normal recurring accruals and reclassification of previously reported amounts to conform to current classifications) necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented. Entergy’s business is subject to seasonal fluctuations, however, with peak periods occurring typically during the first and third quarters. The results for the interim periods presented should not be used as a basis for estimating results of operations for a full year.
88
Table of Contents
Part I, Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
See “
Market and Credit Risk Sensitive Instruments
” section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis.
Part I, Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of
June 30, 2017
, evaluations were performed under the supervision and with the participation of Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy (individually “Registrant” and collectively the “Registrants”) management, including their respective Principal Executive Officers (PEO) and Principal Financial Officers (PFO). The evaluations assessed the effectiveness of the Registrants’ disclosure controls and procedures. Based on the evaluations, each PEO and PFO has concluded that, as to the Registrant or Registrants for which they serve as PEO or PFO, the Registrant’s or Registrants’ disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by each Registrant in reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms; and that the Registrant’s or Registrants’ disclosure controls and procedures are also effective in reasonably assuring that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Registrant’s or Registrants’ management, including their respective PEOs and PFOs, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting
Under the supervision and with the participation of each Registrants’ management, including its respective PEO and PFO, each Registrant evaluated changes in internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended
June 30, 2017
and found no change that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, internal control over financial reporting.
89
Table of Contents
ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Results of Operations
Net Income
Second Quarter
2017
Compared to
Second Quarter
2016
Net income increased $4.7 million primarily due to higher other income.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2017
Compared to
Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
Net income remained relatively unchanged, decreasing by $0.3 million, primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses, higher nuclear refueling outage expenses, and higher depreciation and amortization expenses, substantially offset by higher other income and higher net revenue.
Net Revenue
Second Quarter
2017
Compared to
Second Quarter
2016
Net revenue consists of operating revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale, 2) purchased power expenses, and 3) other regulatory charges. Following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing the
second quarter
2017
to the
second quarter
2016
:
Amount
(In Millions)
2016 net revenue
$365.7
Retail electric price
9.8
Asset retirement obligation
(7.8
)
Other
(1.2
)
2017 net revenue
$366.5
The retail electric price variance is primarily due to the implementation of formula rate plan rates, as approved by the APSC, effective with the first billing cycle of January 2017. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the formula rate plan filing.
The asset retirement obligation affects net revenue because Entergy Arkansas records a regulatory charge or credit for the difference between asset retirement obligation-related expenses and trust earnings plus asset retirement obligation-related costs collected in revenue. The variance is primarily caused by a decrease in regulatory credits because of an increase in decommissioning trust earnings, including portfolio reallocations for the ANO 1 decommissioning trust fund.
90
Table of Contents
Entergy Arkansas, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Six Months Ended June 30, 2017
Compared to
Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
Net revenue consists of operating revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale, 2) purchased power expenses, and 3) other regulatory charges (credits). Following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing the
six months ended June 30, 2017
to the
six months ended June 30, 2016
:
Amount
(In Millions)
2016 net revenue
$687.4
Retail electric price
24.1
Opportunity sales
7.5
Asset retirement obligation
(10.5
)
Volume/weather
(15.1
)
Other
3.4
2017 net revenue
$696.8
The retail electric price variance is primarily due to an increase in base rates effective February 24, 2016 and the implementation of formula rate plan rates effective with the first billing cycle of January 2017, each as approved by the APSC. A significant portion of the base rate increase was related to the purchase of Power Block 2 of the Union Power Station in March 2016. The increase was partially offset by decreases in the energy efficiency rider, as approved by the APSC, effective April 2016 and January 2017. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the rate case and formula rate plan filings. See Note 14 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of the Union Power Station purchase.
The opportunity sales variance results from the estimated net revenue effect recorded in the first quarter 2016 in connection with the FERC orders issued in April 2016 in the opportunity sales proceeding. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the opportunity sales proceeding.
The asset retirement obligation affects net revenue because Entergy Arkansas records a regulatory charge or credit for the difference between asset retirement obligation-related expenses and trust earnings plus asset retirement obligation-related costs collected in revenue. The variance is primarily caused by a decrease in regulatory credits because of an increase in decommissioning trust earnings, including portfolio reallocations for the ANO 1 decommissioning trust fund.
The volume/weather variance is primarily due to decreased usage during the unbilled sales period, including the effect of weather. This decrease was partially offset by an increase of 307 GWh, or 3%, in billed electricity usage, including the effect of more favorable weather on residential and commercial sales and an increase in industrial usage. The increase in industrial usage is primarily due to a new customer in the primary metals industry.
Other Income Statement Variances
Second Quarter
2017
Compared to
Second Quarter
2016
Other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to:
•
a decrease of $5.1 million in fossil-fueled generation expenses primarily due to lower long-term service agreement costs; and
•
a decrease of $2.7 million in nuclear generation expenses primarily due to a decrease in regulatory compliance costs, partially offset by higher nuclear labor costs, including contract labor, in second quarter 2017 as compared to second quarter 2016 primarily due to increased operating costs to position the nuclear fleet to meet its operational goals. The decrease in regulatory compliance costs is primarily related to additional NRC inspection
91
Table of Contents
Entergy Arkansas, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
activities in 2016 as a result of the NRC’s March 2015 decision to move ANO into the “multiple/repetitive degraded cornerstone column” of the NRC’s reactor oversight process action matrix. See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
-
ANO Damage, Outage, and NRC Reviews
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the ANO stator incident and subsequent NRC reviews. See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –
Nuclear Matters
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the increased operating costs to position the nuclear fleet to meet its operational goals.
The decrease was partially offset by an increase of $2.7 million in transmission and distribution expenses due to higher vegetation maintenance costs in 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 and an increase of $1.6 million in compensation and benefits costs primarily due to an increase in net periodic pension and other postretirement benefits costs as a result of a lower discount rate.
Other income increased primarily due to higher realized gains in 2017 as compared to 2016 on the decommissioning trust fund investments, including portfolio reallocations for the ANO 1 decommissioning trust fund.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2017
Compared to
Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
Nuclear refueling outage expenses increased primarily due to the amortization of higher costs associated with the most recent outages as compared to the previous outages.
Other operation and maintenance expenses increased primarily due to:
•
the deferral in first quarter 2016 of $7.7 million of previously-incurred costs related to ANO post-Fukushima compliance and $9.9 million of previously-incurred costs related to ANO flood barrier compliance, as approved by the APSC as part of the 2015 rate case settlement. These costs are being amortized over a ten-year period beginning March 2016. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the rate case settlement;
•
an increase of $5.4 million in transmission and distribution expenses due to higher vegetation maintenance costs in 2017; and
•
an increase of $4 million in compensation and benefits costs
primarily due to a downward revision to estimated incentive compensation expense in first quarter 2016 and an increase in net periodic pension and other postretirement benefits costs as a result of a lower discount rate
.
The increase was partially offset by a decrease of $16.1 million in nuclear generation expenses primarily due to a decrease in regulatory compliance costs as compared to the prior year, partially offset by higher nuclear labor costs, including contract labor, in 2017 compared to the same period in 2016 primarily due to increased operating costs to position the nuclear fleet to meet its operational goals. The decrease in regulatory compliance costs is primarily related to additional NRC inspection activities in 2016 as a result of the NRC’s March 2015 decision to move ANO into the “multiple/repetitive degraded cornerstone column” of the NRC’s reactor oversight process action matrix. See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
-
ANO Damage, Outage, and NRC Reviews
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the ANO stator incident and subsequent NRC reviews. See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –
Nuclear Matters
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the increased operating costs to position the nuclear fleet to meet its operational goals.
Taxes other than income taxes increased primarily due to an increase in ad valorem taxes, higher local franchise taxes, and an increase in payroll taxes. Ad valorem taxes increased primarily due to higher assessments and higher millage rates. Local franchise taxes increased primarily due to higher revenues in 2017 as compared to 2016.
Depreciation and amortization expenses increased primarily due to additions to plant in service, including Power Block 2 of the Union Power Station purchased in March 2016. See Note 14 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of the Union Power Station purchase.
92
Table of Contents
Entergy Arkansas, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Other income increased primarily due to higher realized gains in 2017 as compared to 2016 on the decommissioning trust fund investments, including portfolio reallocations for the ANO 1 decommissioning trust fund.
Interest expense decreased primarily due to $5.1 million in estimated interest expense recorded in the first quarter 2016 in connection with the FERC orders issued in April 2016 in the opportunity sales proceeding. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the opportunity sales proceeding.
Income Taxes
The effective income tax rate was 38.4% for the second quarter 2017. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the
second quarter
2017
versus the federal statutory rate of 35% was primarily due to state income taxes and certain book and tax differences related to utility plant items, partially offset by book and tax differences related to the allowance for equity funds used during construction.
The effective income tax rate was 40.2% for the six months ended June 30, 2017. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2017 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% was primarily due to state income taxes, a write-off of a stock-based compensation deferred tax asset, and certain book and tax differences related to utility plant items, partially offset by book and tax differences related to the allowance for equity funds used during construction.
The effective income tax rates were 40.1% for the second quarter 2016 and 40% for the six months ended June 30, 2016. The differences in the effective income tax rates for the second quarter 2016 and the six months ended June 30, 2016 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% were primarily due to state income taxes and certain book and tax differences related to utility plant items, partially offset by book and tax differences related to the allowance for equity funds used during construction.
ANO Damage, Outage, and NRC Reviews
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
ANO Damage, Outage, and NRC Reviews
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the ANO stator incident, subsequent NRC reviews, and the deferral of replacement power costs.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Flow
Cash flows for the
six months ended
June 30, 2017
and
2016
were as follows:
2017
2016
(In Thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
$20,509
$9,135
Cash flow provided by (used in):
Operating activities
191,161
253,703
Investing activities
(418,321
)
(577,426
)
Financing activities
209,728
339,700
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
(17,432
)
15,977
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$3,077
$25,112
93
Table of Contents
Entergy Arkansas, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Operating Activities
Net cash flow provided by operating activities decreased $62.5 million for the
six months ended
June 30, 2017
compared to the
six months ended
June 30, 2016
primarily due to an increase of $43.8 million in spending on nuclear refueling outages in 2017 and the timing of payments to vendors.
Investing Activities
Net cash flow used in investing activities decreased $159.1 million for the
six months ended
June 30, 2017
compared to the
six months ended
June 30, 2016
primarily due to the purchase of Power Block 2 of the Union Power Station in March 2016 for approximately $237 million and a decrease of $27.5 million in transmission construction expenditures primarily due to a lower scope of non-storm related work performed in 2017. See Note 14 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of the Union Power Station purchase.
The decrease was partially offset by:
•
an increase of $56.6 million in nuclear construction expenditures primarily due to a higher scope of work performed on various nuclear projects in 2017;
•
an increase of $17.8 million in fossil-fueled generation construction expenditures primarily due to a higher scope of work performed on various projects in 2017; and
•
fluctuations in nuclear fuel activity because of variations from year to year in the timing and pricing of fuel reload requirements in the Utility business, material and service deliveries, and the timing of cash payments during the nuclear fuel cycle.
Financing Activities
Net cash flow provided by financing activities decreased $130 million for the
six months ended
June 30, 2017
compared to the
six months ended
June 30, 2016
primarily due to:
•
a $200 million capital contribution received from Entergy Corporation in March 2016 primarily in anticipation of Entergy Arkansas’s purchase of Power Block 2 of the Union Power Station;
•
the issuance of $325 million of 3.5% Series first mortgage bonds in January 2016, a portion of the proceeds of which were used to pay, prior to maturity, $175 million of 5.66% Series first mortgage bonds; and
•
the issuance of $55 million of 3.5% Series first mortgage bonds in June 2016.
The decrease was partially offset by:
•
the issuance of $220 million of 3.5% Series first mortgage bonds in May 2017;
•
net borrowings of $31.4 million on the Entergy Arkansas nuclear fuel company variable interest entity credit facility in 2017 compared to net borrowings of $0.9 million in 2016; and
•
money pool activity.
Decreases in Entergy Arkansas’s payable to the money pool are a use of cash flow, and Entergy Arkansas’s payable to the money pool decreased by $37.6 million in 2017 compared to decreasing by $52.7 million in 2016. The money pool is an inter-company borrowing arrangement designed to reduce the Utility subsidiaries’ need for external short-term borrowings.
See Note 4 to the financial statements herein and Note 5 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for more details on long-term debt.
94
Table of Contents
Entergy Arkansas, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Capital Structure
Entergy Arkansas’s capitalization is balanced between equity and debt, as shown in the following table. The increase in the debt to capital ratio for Entergy Arkansas is primarily due to the issuance of long-term debt in 2017.
June 30,
2017
December 31,
2016
Debt to capital
56.9
%
55.3
%
Effect of excluding the securitization bonds
(0.4
%)
(0.4
%)
Debt to capital, excluding securitization bonds (a)
56.5
%
54.9
%
Effect of subtracting cash
—
%
(0.2
%)
Net debt to net capital, excluding securitization bonds (a)
56.5
%
54.7
%
(a)
Calculation excludes the securitization bonds, which are non-recourse to Entergy Arkansas.
Net debt consists of debt less cash and cash equivalents. Debt consists of short-term borrowings and long-term debt, including the currently maturing portion. Capital consists of debt, preferred stock without sinking fund, and common equity. Net capital consists of capital less cash and cash equivalents. Entergy Arkansas uses the debt to capital ratios excluding securitization bonds in analyzing its financial condition and believes they provide useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating Entergy Arkansas’s financial condition because the securitization bonds are non-recourse to Entergy Arkansas, as more fully described in Note 5 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K. Entergy Arkansas also uses the net debt to net capital ratio excluding securitization bonds in analyzing its financial condition and believes it provides useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating Entergy Arkansas’s financial condition because net debt indicates Entergy Arkansas’s outstanding debt position that could not be readily satisfied by cash and cash equivalents on hand.
Uses and Sources of Capital
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
Liquidity and Capital Resources
”
in the Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy Arkansas’s uses and sources of capital. Following are updates to the information provided in the Form 10-K.
Entergy Arkansas’s receivables from or (payables to) the money pool were as follows:
June 30,
2017
December 31,
2016
June 30,
2016
December 31,
2015
(In Thousands)
($13,669)
($51,232)
$1,453
($52,742)
See Note 4 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a description of the money pool.
Entergy Arkansas has a credit facility in the amount of $150 million scheduled to expire in August 2021. Entergy Arkansas also has a $20 million credit facility scheduled to expire in April 2018. The $150 million credit facility allows Entergy Arkansas to issue letters of credit against 50% of the borrowing capacity of the facility. As of June 30, 2017, there were no cash borrowings and no letters of credit outstanding under the credit facilities. In addition, Entergy Arkansas is a party to an uncommitted letter of credit facility as a means to post collateral to support its obligations to MISO. As of June 30, 2017, a $1 million letter of credit was outstanding under Entergy Arkansas’s uncommitted letter of credit facility. See Note 4 to the financial statements herein for additional discussion of the credit facilities.
95
Table of Contents
Entergy Arkansas, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
The Entergy Arkansas nuclear fuel company variable interest entity has a credit facility in the amount of $80 million scheduled to expire in May 2019. As of June 30, 2017, $14.7 million in letters of credit to support a like amount of commercial paper issued and $16.7 million in loans were outstanding under the Entergy Arkansas nuclear fuel company variable interest entity credit facility. See Note 4 to the financial statements herein for additional discussion of the nuclear fuel company variable interest entity credit facility.
State and Local Rate Regulation and Fuel-Cost Recovery
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –
State and Local Rate Regulation and Fuel-Cost Recovery
”
in the Form 10-K for a discussion of state and local rate regulation and fuel-cost recovery. The following are updates to that discussion.
2016 Formula Rate Plan Filing
As discussed in the Form 10-K, Entergy Arkansas is required to make a supplemental filing supporting the recovery of certain nuclear costs. In April 2017, Entergy Arkansas filed a motion consented to by all parties requesting that it be permitted to submit its supplemental filing in conjunction with its 2017 formula rate plan filing, which was subsequently made in July 2017 and is discussed below. In May 2017 the APSC approved the joint motion and proposal to review Entergy Arkansas’s supplemental filing on a concurrent schedule with the 2017 formula rate plan filing. In doing so, however, the APSC noted that a determination of whether the supplemental information supporting certain nuclear expenditures will be considered in the hearing for the 2017 formula rate plan filing or a separate hearing will be made at a later time.
2017 Formula Rate Plan Filing
In July 2017, Entergy Arkansas filed with the APSC its 2017 formula rate plan filing showing Entergy Arkansas’s projected earned return on common equity for the twelve months ended December 31, 2018 test period to be below the formula rate plan bandwidth. The filing projected a $129.7 million revenue requirement increase to achieve Entergy Arkansas’s target earned return on common equity of 9.75%. Because the projected revenue increase exceeds the four percent annual revenue constraint for each rate class, however, Entergy Arkansas proposed a $70.9 million revenue requirement increase. Entergy Arkansas requested an order approving its proposed formula rate plan adjustment by December 13, 2017. If a final order is not issued by this date, the proposed formula rate plan adjustment will become effective January 2, 2018, subject to refund.
Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) Filing
As discussed in the Form 10-K, in September 2016, Entergy Arkansas filed an application seeking a finding from the APSC that Entergy Arkansas’s deployment of advanced metering infrastructure is in the public interest. In June 2017 the APSC staff and Arkansas Attorney General filed direct testimony. The APSC staff generally supported Entergy Arkansas’s AMI deployment conditioned on various recommendations. The Arkansas Attorney General’s consultant primarily recommended denial of Entergy Arkansas’s application but alternatively suggested recommendations in the event the APSC approves Entergy Arkansas’s proposal. Entergy Arkansas filed rebuttal testimony in June 2017, substantially accepting the APSC staff’s recommendations. In August 2017, Entergy Arkansas and the parties to the proceeding filed a joint motion to suspend the procedural schedule pending the filing with the APSC of an agreement in principle on all issues.
Energy Cost Recovery Rider
In March 2017, Entergy Arkansas filed its annual redetermination of its energy cost rate pursuant to the energy cost recovery rider, which reflected an increase in the rate from
$0.01164
per kWh to
$0.01547
per kWh. The APSC staff filed testimony in March 2017 recommending that the redetermined rate should be implemented with the first billing cycle of April 2017 under the normal operation of the tariff. Accordingly, the redetermined rate went into effect
96
Table of Contents
Entergy Arkansas, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
on March 31, 2017 pursuant to the tariff. In July 2017 the Arkansas Attorney General requested additional information to support certain of the costs included in Entergy Arkansas’s 2017 energy cost rate redetermination.
Opportunity Sales Proceedings
As discussed in the Form 10-K, in June 2009 the LPSC filed a complaint requesting that the FERC determine that certain of Entergy Arkansas’s sales of electric energy to third parties: (a) violated the provisions of the System Agreement that allocated the energy generated by Entergy System resources, (b) imprudently denied the Entergy System and its ultimate consumers the benefits of low-cost Entergy System generating capacity, and (c) violated the provision of the System Agreement that prohibited sales to third parties by individual companies absent an offer of a right-of-first-refusal to other Utility operating companies. The LPSC’s complaint challenges sales made beginning in 2002 and requests refunds.
In April 2016 the FERC issued orders addressing requests for rehearing filed in July 2012 and an ALJ’s August 2013 initial decision. The first order denies Entergy’s request for rehearing and affirms FERC’s earlier rulings that Entergy’s original methodology for allocating energy costs to the opportunity sales was incorrect and, as a result, Entergy Arkansas must make payments to the other Utility operating companies to put them in the same position that they would have been in absent the incorrect allocation. The FERC clarified that interest should be included with the payments. The second order affirmed in part, and reversed in part, the rulings in the ALJ’s August 2013 initial decision regarding the methodology that should be used to calculate the payments Entergy Arkansas is to make to the other Utility operating companies. The FERC affirmed the ALJ’s ruling that a full re-run of intra-system bills should be performed, but required that methodology be modified so that the sales have the same priority for purposes of energy allocation as joint account sales. The FERC reversed the ALJ’s decision that any payments by Entergy Arkansas should be reduced by 20%. The FERC also reversed the ALJ’s decision that adjustments to other System Agreement service schedules and excess bandwidth payments should not be taken into account when calculating the payments to be made by Entergy Arkansas. The FERC held that such adjustments and excess bandwidth payments should be taken into account, but ordered further proceedings before an ALJ to address whether a cap on any reduction due to bandwidth payments was necessary and to implement the other adjustments to the calculation methodology.
In May 2016, Entergy Services filed a request for rehearing of the FERC’s April 2016 order addressing the requests for rehearing filed in July 2012. Entergy Services also filed a request for clarification and/or rehearing of the FERC’s April 2016 order addressing the ALJ’s August 2013 initial decision. The APSC and the LPSC also filed requests for rehearing of the FERC’s April 2016 order. The rehearing and clarification requests filed in May 2016 are pending FERC action.
Pursuant to the procedural schedule established in the case, Entergy Services re-ran intra-system bills for the ten-year period 2000-2009 to quantify the effects of the FERC's ruling. In November 2016 the LPSC submitted testimony disputing certain aspects of the calculations, and Entergy Services submitted answering testimony in January 2017. In February 2017 the FERC staff filed testimony and Entergy Services filed responsive testimony. In March 2017 the LPSC filed rebuttal testimony. A hearing was held in May 2017. In July 2017, the ALJ issued an initial decision concluding that Entergy Arkansas should pay $86 million plus interest to the other Utility operating companies. The Utility operating companies have the opportunity to challenge the ALJ’s initial decision by filing a brief on exceptions with the FERC. No payments will be made or received by the Utility operating companies until the FERC issues an order reviewing the initial decision and Entergy submits a subsequent filing to comply with that order.
The effect of the FERC’s decisions thus far in the case would be that Entergy Arkansas will make payments to some or all of the other Utility operating companies. Because further proceedings will still occur in the case, the amount and recipients of payments by Entergy Arkansas are unknown at this time. Based on testimony previously submitted in the case and its assessment of the April 2016 FERC orders, in the first quarter 2016, Entergy Arkansas recorded a liability of $87 million, which includes interest, for its estimated increased costs and payment to the other Utility operating companies. This estimate is subject to change depending on how the FERC resolves the issues that are still outstanding in the case, including its review of the July 2017 initial decision. Entergy Arkansas’s increased
97
Table of Contents
Entergy Arkansas, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
costs will be attributed to Entergy Arkansas’s retail and wholesale businesses, and it is not probable that Entergy Arkansas will recover the wholesale portion. Entergy Arkansas, therefore, recorded a regulatory asset in the first quarter 2016 of approximately $75 million, which represents its estimate of the retail portion of the costs.
Federal Regulation
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –
Federal Regulation
”
in the Form 10-K for a discussion of federal regulation.
Nuclear Matters
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
Nuclear Matters
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of nuclear matters.
Environmental Risks
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
Environmental Risks
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of environmental risks.
Critical Accounting Estimates
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
Critical Accounting Estimates
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the estimates and judgments necessary in Entergy Arkansas’s accounting for nuclear decommissioning costs, utility regulatory accounting, unbilled revenue, impairment of long-lived assets and trust fund investments, taxation and uncertain tax positions, qualified pension and other postretirement benefits, and other contingencies.
New Accounting Pronouncements
See “
New Accounting Pronouncements
” section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis for further discussion.
98
Table of Contents
ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended
Six Months Ended
2017
2016
2017
2016
(In Thousands)
(In Thousands)
OPERATING REVENUES
Electric
$496,662
$504,252
$971,013
$969,625
OPERATING EXPENSES
Operation and Maintenance:
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
50,691
88,022
150,100
168,959
Purchased power
74,552
49,714
129,685
111,518
Nuclear refueling outage expenses
17,335
14,981
36,954
30,050
Other operation and maintenance
171,821
173,909
337,678
326,815
Decommissioning
14,106
13,301
28,001
26,404
Taxes other than income taxes
25,128
22,961
49,179
46,047
Depreciation and amortization
69,087
67,115
136,153
130,288
Other regulatory charges (credits) - net
4,948
802
(5,578
)
1,719
TOTAL
427,668
430,805
862,172
841,800
OPERATING INCOME
68,994
73,447
108,841
127,825
OTHER INCOME
Allowance for equity funds used during construction
5,432
3,995
9,782
8,927
Interest and investment income
14,195
5,770
21,127
9,364
Miscellaneous - net
(57
)
(1,020
)
(164
)
(1,795
)
TOTAL
19,570
8,745
30,745
16,496
INTEREST EXPENSE
Interest expense
28,514
27,792
55,766
60,574
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction
(2,552
)
(2,136
)
(4,514
)
(4,851
)
TOTAL
25,962
25,656
51,252
55,723
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES
62,602
56,536
88,334
88,598
Income taxes
24,052
22,645
35,480
35,413
NET INCOME
38,550
33,891
52,854
53,185
Preferred dividend requirements
357
1,718
714
3,437
EARNINGS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCK
$38,193
$32,173
$52,140
$49,748
See Notes to Financial Statements.
99
Table of Contents
(page left blank intentionally)
100
Table of Contents
ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited)
2017
2016
(In Thousands)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income
$52,854
$53,185
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flow provided by operating activities:
Depreciation, amortization, and decommissioning, including nuclear fuel amortization
198,082
211,630
Deferred income taxes, investment tax credits, and non-current taxes accrued
38,005
122,195
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Receivables
12,092
(42,371
)
Fuel inventory
(1,602
)
5,093
Accounts payable
(29,109
)
66,118
Prepaid taxes and taxes accrued
937
(89,124
)
Interest accrued
1,816
(1,093
)
Deferred fuel costs
(48,442
)
(40,847
)
Other working capital accounts
(32,055
)
25,021
Provisions for estimated losses
7,457
1,142
Other regulatory assets
(5,592
)
7,048
Pension and other postretirement liabilities
(40,637
)
(45,752
)
Other assets and liabilities
37,355
(18,542
)
Net cash flow provided by operating activities
191,161
253,703
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Construction expenditures
(381,197
)
(316,569
)
Allowance for equity funds used during construction
10,198
9,229
Payment for purchase of plant
—
(236,969
)
Nuclear fuel purchases
(92,927
)
(64,689
)
Proceeds from sale of nuclear fuel
51,029
40,336
Proceeds from nuclear decommissioning trust fund sales
167,329
103,815
Investment in nuclear decommissioning trust funds
(173,324
)
(112,040
)
Change in money pool receivable - net
—
(1,453
)
Changes in securitization account
571
1,017
Other
—
(103
)
Net cash flow used in investing activities
(418,321
)
(577,426
)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt
222,937
380,141
Retirement of long-term debt
(6,799
)
(181,604
)
Capital contribution from parent
—
200,000
Changes in short-term borrowings - net
31,436
908
Changes in money pool payable - net
(37,563
)
(52,742
)
Dividends paid:
Preferred stock
(714
)
(3,437
)
Other
431
(3,566
)
Net cash flow provided by financing activities
209,728
339,700
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
(17,432
)
15,977
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
20,509
9,135
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$3,077
$25,112
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest - net of amount capitalized
$51,232
$58,733
Income taxes
$—
$7,242
See Notes to Financial Statements.
101
Table of Contents
ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016
(Unaudited)
2017
2016
(In Thousands)
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents:
Cash
$2,741
$20,174
Temporary cash investments
336
335
Total cash and cash equivalents
3,077
20,509
Securitization recovery trust account
3,569
4,140
Accounts receivable:
Customer
96,720
102,229
Allowance for doubtful accounts
(1,084
)
(1,211
)
Associated companies
36,015
35,286
Other
40,672
58,153
Accrued unbilled revenues
110,235
100,193
Total accounts receivable
282,558
294,650
Deferred fuel costs
145,033
96,690
Fuel inventory - at average cost
34,362
32,760
Materials and supplies - at average cost
182,839
182,600
Deferred nuclear refueling outage costs
109,546
81,313
Prepayments and other
19,691
14,293
TOTAL
780,675
726,955
OTHER PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS
Decommissioning trust funds
884,308
834,735
Other
5,536
7,912
TOTAL
889,844
842,647
UTILITY PLANT
Electric
10,726,461
10,488,060
Property under capital lease
637
716
Construction work in progress
328,037
304,073
Nuclear fuel
259,901
307,352
TOTAL UTILITY PLANT
11,315,036
11,100,201
Less - accumulated depreciation and amortization
4,666,137
4,635,885
UTILITY PLANT - NET
6,648,899
6,464,316
DEFERRED DEBITS AND OTHER ASSETS
Regulatory assets:
Regulatory asset for income taxes - net
66,024
62,646
Other regulatory assets (includes securitization property of $35,365 as of June 30, 2017 and $41,164 as of December 31, 2016)
1,430,243
1,428,029
Deferred fuel costs
66,997
66,898
Other
16,577
14,626
TOTAL
1,579,841
1,572,199
TOTAL ASSETS
$9,899,259
$9,606,117
See Notes to Financial Statements.
102
Table of Contents
ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016
(Unaudited)
2017
2016
(In Thousands)
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Currently maturing long-term debt
$114,700
$114,700
Short-term borrowings
14,696
—
Accounts payable:
Associated companies
152,723
239,711
Other
204,921
185,153
Customer deposits
97,425
97,512
Taxes accrued
8,131
7,194
Interest accrued
18,396
16,580
Other
36,150
36,557
TOTAL
647,142
697,407
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accumulated deferred income taxes and taxes accrued
2,224,030
2,186,623
Accumulated deferred investment tax credits
34,704
35,305
Other regulatory liabilities
330,797
305,907
Decommissioning
952,353
924,353
Accumulated provisions
26,139
18,682
Pension and other postretirement liabilities
383,543
424,234
Long-term debt (includes securitization bonds of $41,502 as of June 30, 2017 and $48,139 as of December 31, 2016)
2,949,561
2,715,085
Other
14,183
13,854
TOTAL
6,915,310
6,624,043
Commitments and Contingencies
Preferred stock without sinking fund
31,350
31,350
COMMON EQUITY
Common stock, $0.01 par value, authorized 325,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 46,980,196 shares in 2017 and 2016
470
470
Paid-in capital
790,243
790,243
Retained earnings
1,514,744
1,462,604
TOTAL
2,305,457
2,253,317
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
$9,899,259
$9,606,117
See Notes to Financial Statements.
103
Table of Contents
ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN COMMON EQUITY
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited)
Common Equity
Common
Stock
Paid-in
Capital
Retained
Earnings
Total
(In Thousands)
Balance at December 31, 2015
$470
$588,493
$1,302,695
$1,891,658
Net income
—
—
53,185
53,185
Capital contribution from parent
—
200,000
—
200,000
Preferred stock dividends
—
—
(3,437
)
(3,437
)
Balance at June 30, 2016
$470
$788,493
$1,352,443
$2,141,406
Balance at December 31, 2016
$470
$790,243
$1,462,604
$2,253,317
Net income
—
—
52,854
52,854
Preferred stock dividends
—
—
(714
)
(714
)
Balance at June 30, 2017
$470
$790,243
$1,514,744
$2,305,457
See Notes to Financial Statements.
104
Table of Contents
ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SELECTED OPERATING RESULTS
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended
Increase/
Description
2017
2016
(Decrease)
%
(Dollars In Millions)
Electric Operating Revenues:
Residential
$160
$153
$7
5
Commercial
119
115
4
3
Industrial
114
100
14
14
Governmental
5
4
1
25
Total retail
398
372
26
7
Sales for resale:
Associated companies
31
25
6
24
Non-associated companies
6
37
(31
)
(84
)
Other
62
70
(8
)
(11
)
Total
$497
$504
($7
)
(1
)
Billed Electric Energy Sales (GWh):
Residential
1,462
1,409
53
4
Commercial
1,372
1,350
22
2
Industrial
1,829
1,582
247
16
Governmental
57
55
2
4
Total retail
4,720
4,396
324
7
Sales for resale:
Associated companies
387
539
(152
)
(28
)
Non-associated companies
386
2,252
(1,866
)
(83
)
Total
5,493
7,187
(1,694
)
(24
)
Six Months Ended
Increase/
Description
2017
2016
(Decrease)
%
(Dollars In Millions)
Electric Operating Revenues:
Residential
$343
$345
($2
)
(1
)
Commercial
225
225
—
—
Industrial
210
200
10
5
Governmental
9
8
1
13
Total retail
787
778
9
1
Sales for resale:
Associated companies
63
(7
)
70
1,000
Non-associated companies
51
75
(24
)
(32
)
Other
70
124
(54
)
(44
)
Total
$971
$970
$1
—
Billed Electric Energy Sales (GWh):
Residential
3,389
3,433
(44
)
(1
)
Commercial
2,687
2,690
(3
)
—
Industrial
3,510
3,158
352
11
Governmental
113
111
2
2
Total retail
9,699
9,392
307
3
Sales for resale:
Associated companies
833
964
(131
)
(14
)
Non-associated companies
2,348
4,808
(2,460
)
(51
)
Total
12,880
15,164
(2,284
)
(15
)
105
Table of Contents
ENTERGY LOUISIANA, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Results of Operations
Net Income
Second Quarter 2017 Compared to Second Quarter 2016
Net income decreased $128.8 million primarily due to the effect of a settlement with the IRS related to the 2010-2011 IRS audit which resulted in a $136.1 million reduction of income tax expense in 2016. See Note 3 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
Net income decreased $146.1 million primarily due to the effect of a settlement with the IRS related to the 2010-2011 IRS audit which resulted in a $136.1 million reduction of income tax expense in 2016. See Note 3 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing.
Net Revenue
Second Quarter 2017 Compared to Second Quarter 2016
Net revenue consists of operating revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale, 2) purchased power expenses, and 3) other regulatory charges (credits). Following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing the second quarter 2017 to the second quarter 2016:
Amount
(In Millions)
2016 net revenue
$608.2
Louisiana Act 55 financing savings obligation
16.1
Volume/weather
(6.7
)
Other
5.6
2017 net revenue
$623.2
The Louisiana Act 55 financing savings obligation variance results from a regulatory charge recorded in 2016 for tax savings to be shared with customers per an agreement approved by the LPSC. The tax savings resulted from the 2010-2011 IRS audit settlement on the treatment of the Louisiana Act 55 financing of storm costs for Hurricane Gustav and Hurricane Ike. See Note 3 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing.
The volume/weather variance is primarily due to decreased usage during the unbilled sales period, including the effect of weather. This decrease was partially offset by an increase of 507 GWh, or 4%, in billed electricity usage, including an increase in industrial usage. The increase in industrial usage is primarily due to an increase in demand from cogeneration customers and an increase in demand for existing customers as well as expansion projects in the chemicals industry, partially offset by extended seasonal outages for an existing large refinery customer.
106
Table of Contents
Entergy Louisiana, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
Net revenue consists of operating revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale, 2) purchased power expenses, and 3) other regulatory charges (credits). Following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing the six months ended June 30, 2017 to the six months ended June 30, 2016:
Amount
(In Millions)
2016 net revenue
$1,172.1
Louisiana Act 55 financing savings obligation
16.1
Retail electric price
9.3
Volume/weather
(11.0
)
Other
(2.2
)
2017 net revenue
$1,184.3
The Louisiana Act 55 financing savings obligation variance results from a regulatory charge recorded in 2016 for tax savings to be shared with customers per an agreement approved by the LPSC. The tax savings resulted from the 2010-2011 IRS audit settlement on the treatment of the Louisiana Act 55 financing of storm costs for Hurricane Gustav and Hurricane Ike. See Note 3 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing.
The retail electric price variance is primarily due to an increase in formula rate plan revenues, implemented with the first billing cycle of March 2016, to collect the estimated first-year revenue requirement related to the purchase of Power Blocks 3 and 4 of the Union Power Station in March 2016. See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for further discussion of formula rate plan revenues.
The volume/weather variance is primarily due to decreased usage during the unbilled sales period and the effect of less favorable weather on residential sales. This decrease was partially offset by an increase of 328 GWh, or 2%, in industrial usage primarily due to an increase in demand from cogeneration customers and an increase in demand for existing customers as well as expansion projects in the chemicals industry, partially offset by extended seasonal outages for an existing large refinery customer.
Other Income Statement Variances
Second Quarter 2017 Compared to Second Quarter 2016
Other operation and maintenance expenses increased primarily due to:
•
an increase of $3.8 million in nuclear generation expenses primarily due to higher nuclear labor costs, including contract labor, primarily due to increased operating costs to position the nuclear fleet to meet its operational goals, partially offset by a lower scope of work performed during plant outages in the second quarter 2017 as compared to the second quarter 2016.
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –
Nuclear Matters
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the increased operating costs to position the nuclear fleet to meet its operational goals
;
•
an increase of $2.6 million in transmission and distribution expenses due to higher vegetation maintenance costs;
•
an increase of $1.9 million due to the effect of recording in 2016 a final court decision in the Entergy Louisiana lawsuit against the DOE related to the River Bend spent nuclear fuel storage costs. The damages awarded included the reimbursement in 2016 of spent nuclear fuel storage costs previously recorded as other operation and maintenance expense;
•
an increase of $1 million as a result of the amount of transmission costs allocated by MISO.
See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for further information on the recovery of these costs
; and
107
Table of Contents
Entergy Louisiana, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
•
several individually insignificant items.
The increase was partially offset by a decrease of $3.1 million in loss provisions.
Other income increased primarily due to an increase in the allowance for equity funds used during construction due to higher construction work in progress in 2017, which included the St. Charles Power Station project, and higher realized gains in 2017 on the River Bend decommissioning trust fund investments as a result of portfolio reallocations to the 30% interest in River Bend formerly owned by Cajun.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
Other operation and maintenance expenses increased primarily due to:
•
an increase of $3.9 million in compensation and benefits costs
primarily due to a downward revision to estimated incentive compensation expense in first quarter 2016
;
•
an increase of $3.5 million in fossil-fueled generation expenses primarily due to the purchase of Power Blocks 3 and 4 of the Union Power Station in March 2016, partially offset by asbestos loss provisions in 2016;
•
an increase of $2.9 million in other loss provisions in 2017;
•
an increase of $2.2 million in information technology expenses including software maintenance costs and upgrade projects;
•
an increase of $2.1 million in transmission expenses primarily due to higher labor costs, including contract labor;
•
an increase of $2.1 million as a result of the amount of transmission costs allocated by MISO.
See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for further information on the recovery of these costs;
•
an increase of $1.9 million due to the effect of recording in 2016 a final court decision in the Entergy Louisiana lawsuit against the DOE related to the River Bend spent nuclear fuel storage costs. The damages awarded included the reimbursement in 2016 of spent nuclear fuel storage costs previously recorded as other operation and maintenance expense; and
•
an increase of $1.8 million in nuclear generation expenses primarily due to higher nuclear labor costs, including contract labor, primarily due to increased operating costs to position the nuclear fleet to meet its operational goals, partially offset by a lower scope of work performed during plant outages in 2017 as compared to 2016.
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –
Nuclear Matters
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the increased operating costs to position the nuclear fleet to meet its operational goals.
Depreciation and amortization expenses increased primarily due to additions to plant in service, including Power Blocks 3 and 4 of the Union Power Station purchased in March 2016. See Note 14 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of the Union Power Station purchase.
Other income increased primarily due to an increase in the allowance for equity funds used during construction due to higher construction work in progress in 2017, which included the St. Charles Power Station project, and higher realized gains in 2017 on the River Bend decommissioning trust fund investments as a result of portfolio reallocations to the 30% interest in River Bend formerly owned by Cajun.
Income Taxes
The effective income tax rates were 31.3% for the second quarter 2017 and 31.3% for the six months ended June 30, 2017. The differences in the effective income tax rates for the second quarter 2017 and the six months ended June 30, 2017 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% were primarily due to book and tax differences related to the non-taxable income distributions earned on preferred membership interests and book and tax differences related to the allowance for equity funds used during construction, partially offset by state income taxes.
108
Table of Contents
Entergy Louisiana, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
The effective income tax rates were (50.6%) for the second quarter 2016 and (10.7%) for the six months ended June 30, 2016. The differences in the effective income tax rates for the second quarter 2016 and the six months ended June 30, 2016 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% were primarily due to the reversal of a portion of the provision for uncertain tax positions as a result of the settlement of the 2010-2011 IRS audit in the second quarter 2016 and book and tax differences related to the non-taxable income distributions earned on preferred membership interests, partially offset by state income taxes. See Note 3 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for additional discussion of the 2010-2011 IRS audit settlement.
Louisiana Tax Legislation
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –
Louisiana Tax Legislation
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the Louisiana tax legislation.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Flow
Cash flows for the
six months ended
June 30, 2017
and
2016
were as follows:
2017
2016
(In Thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
$213,850
$35,102
Cash flow provided by (used in):
Operating activities
533,755
440,356
Investing activities
(900,210
)
(859,906
)
Financing activities
367,888
459,253
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
1,433
39,703
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$215,283
$74,805
Operating Activities
Net cash flow provided by operating activities increased $93.4 million for the
six months ended
June 30, 2017
compared to the
six months ended
June 30, 2016
primarily due to:
•
income tax refunds of $116.9 million in 2017 compared to income tax payments of $62.7 million in 2016. Entergy Louisiana received income tax refunds in 2017 and made income tax payments in 2016 in accordance with an intercompany income tax allocation agreement. The income tax refunds in 2017 resulted from the utilization of Entergy Louisiana’s net operating losses. The income tax payments in 2016 related to the 2016 payments for state taxes resulting from the effect of the final settlement of the 2006-2007 IRS audit and the effect of net operating loss limitations. See Note 3 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the audit. See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
Louisiana Tax Legislation
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion on the net operating loss limitations;
•
an interest payment of $60 million made in March 2016 related to the purchase of a beneficial interest in the Waterford 3 leased assets; and
•
the timing of collections from customers and payments to vendors.
109
Table of Contents
Entergy Louisiana, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
The increase was partially offset by:
•
a refund to customers in January 2017 of approximately $71 million as a result of the settlement approved by the LPSC related to the Waterford 3 replacement steam generator project. See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for discussion of the settlement and refund;
•
a decrease due to the timing of recovery of fuel and purchased power costs in 2017; and
•
an increase of $47.8 million in spending on nuclear refueling outages in 2017.
Investing Activities
Net cash flow used in investing activities increased $40.3 million for the
six months ended
June 30, 2017
compared to the
six months ended
June 30, 2016
primarily due to:
•
an increase of $205.5 million in fossil-fueled generation construction expenditures primarily due to higher spending on the St. Charles Power Station project in 2017;
•
fluctuations in nuclear fuel activity because of variations from year to year in the timing and pricing of fuel reload requirements in the Utility business, material and service deliveries, and the timing of cash payments during the nuclear fuel cycle;
•
an increase of $75.8 million in transmission construction expenditures due to a higher scope of work performed in 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016;
•
an increase of $44.1 million in nuclear construction expenditures primarily due to increased spending on various nuclear projects in 2017; and
•
money pool activity.
The increase was partially offset by the purchase of Power Blocks 3 and 4 of the Union Power Station for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $474 million in March 2016. See Note 14 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of the Union Power Station purchase.
Increases in Entergy Louisiana’s receivable from the money pool are a use of cash flow, and Entergy Louisiana‘s receivable from the money pool increased by $33 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to increasing by $0.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016. The money pool is an inter-company borrowing arrangement designed to reduce the Utility subsidiaries’ need for external short-term borrowings.
Financing Activities
Net cash flow provided by financing activities decreased $91.4 million for the
six months ended
June 30, 2017
compared to the
six months ended
June 30, 2016
primarily due to the net issuance of $430.4 million of long-term debt in 2017 compared to the net issuance of $568.7 million in 2016. The decrease was partially offset by:
•
net borrowings of $30.7 million on the nuclear fuel company variable interest entities’ credit facilities in 2017 compared to net repayments of $0.9 million in 2016; and
•
a decrease of $14.3 million of common equity distributions primarily as a result of higher construction expenditures and higher nuclear fuel purchases in 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016.
See Note 4 to the financial statements herein and Note 5 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for more details on long-term debt.
110
Table of Contents
Entergy Louisiana, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Capital Structure
Entergy Louisiana’s capitalization is balanced between equity and debt, as shown in the following table. The increase in the debt to capital ratio for Entergy Louisiana is primarily due to the issuance of long-term debt in 2017.
June 30,
2017
December 31,
2016
Debt to capital
54.7
%
53.4
%
Effect of excluding securitization bonds
(0.4
%)
(0.5
%)
Debt to capital, excluding securitization bonds (a)
54.3
%
52.9
%
Effect of subtracting cash
(0.9
%)
(0.9
%)
Net debt to net capital, excluding securitization bonds (a)
53.4
%
52.0
%
(a)
Calculation excludes the securitization bonds, which are non-recourse to Entergy Louisiana.
Net debt consists of debt less cash and cash equivalents. Debt consists of short-term borrowings and long-term debt, including the currently maturing portion. Capital consists of debt and common equity. Net capital consists of capital less cash and cash equivalents. Entergy Louisiana uses the debt to capital ratios excluding securitization bonds in analyzing its financial condition and believes they provide useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating Entergy Louisiana’s financial condition because the securitization bonds are non-recourse to Entergy Louisiana, as more fully described in Note 5 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K. Entergy Louisiana also uses the net debt to net capital ratio excluding securitization bonds in analyzing its financial condition and believes it provides useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating Entergy Louisiana’s financial condition because net debt indicates Entergy Louisiana’s outstanding debt position that could not be readily satisfied by cash and cash equivalents on hand.
Uses and Sources of Capital
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
Liquidity and Capital Resources
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy Louisiana’s uses and sources of capital. Following are updates to the information provided in the Form 10-K.
Entergy Louisiana’s receivables from the money pool were as follows:
June 30,
2017
December 31,
2016
June 30,
2016
December 31,
2015
(In Thousands)
$55,542
$22,503
$6,322
$6,154
See Note 4 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a description of the money pool.
Entergy Louisiana has a credit facility in the amount of $350 million scheduled to expire in August 2021. The credit facility allows Entergy Louisiana to issue letters of credit against 50% of the borrowing capacity of the facility. As of
June 30, 2017
, there were no cash borrowings and $4.5 million of letters of credit outstanding under the credit facility. In addition, Entergy Louisiana is a party to an uncommitted letter of credit facility as a means to post collateral to support its obligations to MISO. As of
June 30, 2017
, a $36.8 million letter of credit was outstanding under Entergy Louisiana’s uncommitted letter of credit facility. See Note 4 to the financial statements herein for additional discussion of the credit facilities.
The Entergy Louisiana nuclear fuel company variable interest entities have two separate credit facilities, one in the amount of $105 million and one in the amount of $85 million, both scheduled to expire in May 2019. As of
June 30, 2017
, $15.5 million in loans were outstanding under the credit facility for the Entergy Louisiana River Bend nuclear fuel company variable interest entity. As of June 30, 2017, $34.5 million in letters of credit to support a like amount of commercial paper issued and $36.3 million in loans were outstanding under the Entergy Louisiana Waterford
111
Table of Contents
Entergy Louisiana, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
nuclear fuel company variable interest entity credit facility. See Note 4 to the financial statements herein for additional discussion of the nuclear fuel company variable interest entity credit facilities.
Lake Charles Power Station
In November 2016, Entergy Louisiana filed an application with the LPSC seeking certification that the public convenience and necessity would be served by the construction of the Lake Charles Power Station, a nominal 994 MW combined-cycle generating unit in Westlake, Louisiana, on land adjacent to the existing Nelson plant in Calcasieu Parish. The current estimated cost of the Lake Charles Power Station is $872 million, including estimated costs of transmission interconnection and other related costs. In May 2017 the parties to the proceeding agreed to an uncontested stipulation finding that construction of the Lake Charles Power Station is in the public interest and authorizing an in-service rate recovery plan. In July 2017 the LPSC issued an order unanimously approving the stipulation. Subject to the timely receipt of other permits and approvals, commercial operation is estimated to occur by mid-2020.
Washington Parish Energy Center
In April 2017, Entergy Louisiana signed a purchase and sale agreement with a subsidiary of Calpine Corporation for the acquisition of a peaking plant. Calpine will construct the plant, which will consist of two natural gas-fired combustion turbine units with a total nominal capacity of approximately 360 MW. The plant, named the Washington Parish Energy Center, will be located in Bogalusa, Louisiana and, subject to permits and approvals, is expected to be completed in 2021. Subject to regulatory approvals, Entergy Louisiana will purchase the plant once it is complete for an estimated total investment of approximately $261 million, including transmission and other related costs. In May 2017, Entergy Louisiana filed an application with the LPSC seeking certification of the plant. A procedural schedule has been established, with a hearing in March 2018.
State and Local Rate Regulation and Fuel-Cost Recovery
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –
State and Local Rate Regulation and Fuel Cost Recovery
”
in the Form 10-K for a discussion of state and local rate regulation and fuel cost recovery. The following are updates to that discussion.
Retail Rates - Electric
2014 Formula Rate Plan Filing
As discussed in the Form 10-K, in September 2015, Entergy Louisiana filed its formula rate plan evaluation report for Entergy Gulf States Louisiana’s and Entergy Louisiana’s 2014 calendar year operations. In June 2017 the LPSC staff and Entergy Louisiana filed an unopposed joint report of proceedings, which was accepted by the LPSC in June 2017, finalizing the results of this proceeding with no changes to rates already implemented.
2015 Formula Rate Plan Filing
As discussed in the Form 10-K, in May 2016, Entergy Louisiana filed its formula rate plan evaluation report for its 2015 calendar year operations. In June 2017 the LPSC staff and Entergy Louisiana filed a joint report of proceedings, which was accepted by the LPSC in June 2017, finalizing the results of the May 2016 evaluation report, interim updates, and corresponding proceedings with no changes to rates already implemented.
Also, in November 2016, Entergy Louisiana filed with the LPSC a request to extend the MISO cost recovery mechanism rider provision of its formula rate plan. In March 2017 the LPSC staff submitted direct testimony generally supportive of a one-year extension of the MISO cost recovery mechanism and the intervenor in the proceeding does not oppose an extension for this period of time. In June 2017 an uncontested joint stipulation authorizing a one-year extension of the MISO cost recovery mechanism rider was filed and the LPSC approved the stipulation in July 2017.
112
Table of Contents
Entergy Louisiana, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
2016 Formula Rate Plan Filing
In May 2017, Entergy Louisiana filed its formula rate plan evaluation report for its 2016 calendar year operations. The evaluation report reflects an earned return on common equity of 9.84%. As such, no adjustment to base formula rate plan revenue is required. The following adjustments, however, are required under the formula rate plan. The 2016 formula rate plan evaluation report shows a decrease in formula rate plan revenue of approximately $16.9 million, comprised of a decrease in legacy Entergy Louisiana formula rate plan revenue of $3.5 million, a decrease in legacy Entergy Gulf States Louisiana formula rate plan revenue of $9.7 million, and a decrease in incremental formula rate plan revenue of $3.6 million. Additionally, the formula rate plan evaluation report calls for a decrease in the MISO cost recovery revenue requirement of $40.5 million, from the present level of $46.8 million to $6.3 million. Rates reflecting these adjustments will be implemented with the first billing cycle of September 2017, subject to refund, pending the review proceedings. Parties have intervened in the proceedings. No procedural schedule has been established.
Waterford 3 Replacement Steam Generator Project
See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of the Waterford 3 replacement steam generator project prudence review proceeding. The refund to customers of approximately $71 million as a result of the settlement approved by the LPSC was made to customers in January 2017. Following a review by the parties, an unopposed joint report of proceedings was filed by the LPSC staff and Entergy Louisiana in May 2017. In May 2017 the LPSC accepted the joint report of proceedings resolving the matter.
Union Power Station
As a term of the LPSC-approved settlement authorizing the purchase of Power Blocks 3 and 4 of the Union Power Station, Entergy Louisiana agreed to make a filing with the LPSC to review its decisions to deactivate Ninemile 3 and Willow Glen 2 and 4 and its decision to retire Little Gypsy 1. In January 2016, Entergy Louisiana made its compliance filing with the LPSC. Entergy Louisiana, LPSC staff, and intervenors participated in a technical conference in March 2016 where Entergy Louisiana presented information on its deactivation/retirement decisions for these four units in addition to information on the current deactivation decisions for the ten-year planning horizon. Parties have requested further proceedings on the prudence of the decision to deactivate Willow Glen 2 and 4. No party contests the prudence of the decision to deactivate Willow Glen 2 and 4 or suggests reactivation of these units; however, issues have been raised related to Entergy Louisiana’s decision to give up its transmission service rights in MISO for Willow Glen 2 and 4 rather than placing the units into suspended status for the three year term permitted by MISO. This matter is pending before an ALJ, with an evidentiary hearing scheduled in August 2017.
Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) Filing
As discussed in the Form 10-K, in November 2016, Entergy Louisiana filed an application seeking a finding from the LPSC that Entergy Louisiana’s deployment of advanced electric and gas metering infrastructure is in the public interest. The parties reached an uncontested stipulation permitting implementation of Entergy Louisiana’s proposed AMI system, with modifications to the proposed customer charge. In July 2017 the LPSC approved the stipulation.
Retail Rates - Gas
2016 Rate Stabilization Plan Filing
In January 2017, Entergy Louisiana filed with the LPSC its gas rate stabilization plan for the test year ended September 30, 2016. The filing of the evaluation report for test year 2016 reflected an earned return on common equity of 6.37%. As part of the original filing, pursuant to the extraordinary cost provision of the rate stabilization plan, Entergy Louisiana sought to recover approximately $1.5 million in deferred operation and maintenance expenses
113
Table of Contents
Entergy Louisiana, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
incurred to restore service and repair damage resulting from flooding and widespread rainfall in southeast Louisiana that occurred in August 2016. Entergy Louisiana requested to recover the prudently incurred August 2016 storm restoration costs over ten years, outside of the rate stabilization plan sharing provisions. As a result, Entergy Louisiana’s filing sought an annual increase in revenue of $1.4 million. Following review of the filing, except for the proposed extraordinary cost recovery, the LPSC staff confirmed Entergy Louisiana’s filing was consistent with the principles and requirements of the rate stabilization plan. The extraordinary cost recovery request associated with the 2016 flood-related deferred operation and maintenance expenses incurred for gas operations was removed from the rate stabilization plan pending LPSC consideration in a separate docket. In April 2017 the LPSC approved a joint report of proceedings and Entergy Louisiana submitted a revised evaluation report reflecting a $1.2 million annual increase in revenue with rates implemented with the first billing cycle of May 2017.
In connection with the joint report of proceedings accepted by the LPSC, in May 2017, Entergy Louisiana filed an application to initiate a separate proceeding to recover the deferred operation and maintenance expenses incurred to restore service and repair damage resulting from flooding and widespread rainfall in southeast Louisiana that occurred in August 2016 through the extraordinary cost provision of the gas rate stabilization plan. A procedural schedule has been established with a hearing in November 2017.
Fuel and purchased power cost recovery
As discussed in the Form 10-K, in June 2016 the LPSC staff provided notice of audits of Entergy Louisiana’s fuel adjustment clause filings and purchased gas adjustment clause filings. Discovery commenced in March 2017.
Industrial and Commercial Customers
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –
Industrial and Commercial Customers
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of industrial and commercial customers.
Federal Regulation
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –
Federal Regulation
”
in the Form 10-K for a discussion of federal regulation.
Nuclear Matters
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
Nuclear Matters
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of nuclear matters. The following is an update to that discussion.
River Bend’s operating license is currently due to expire in August 2025. In May 2017, Entergy Louisiana filed an application with the NRC for an extension of River Bend’s operating license to 2045.
Environmental Risks
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
Environmental Risks
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of environmental risks.
Critical Accounting Estimates
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
Critical Accounting Estimates
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the estimates and judgments necessary in Entergy Louisiana’s accounting for nuclear decommissioning costs, utility regulatory accounting, unbilled revenue, impairment of long-lived assets and trust fund investments, taxation and uncertain tax positions, qualified pension and other postretirement benefits, and other contingencies.
114
Table of Contents
Entergy Louisiana, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
New Accounting Pronouncements
See “
New Accounting Pronouncements
” section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis for further discussion.
115
Table of Contents
Entergy Louisiana, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
(page left blank intentionally)
116
Table of Contents
ENTERGY LOUISIANA, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended
Six Months Ended
2017
2016
2017
2016
(In Thousands)
(In Thousands)
OPERATING REVENUES
Electric
$1,072,126
$989,732
$1,936,202
$1,926,163
Natural gas
11,308
9,302
28,015
28,016
TOTAL
1,083,434
999,034
1,964,217
1,954,179
OPERATING EXPENSES
Operation and Maintenance:
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
180,056
152,340
334,100
354,423
Purchased power
282,673
224,699
522,500
416,097
Nuclear refueling outage expenses
12,764
12,974
24,949
25,754
Other operation and maintenance
243,217
232,957
466,447
439,021
Decommissioning
12,283
11,658
24,406
23,166
Taxes other than income taxes
45,076
44,366
90,359
86,728
Depreciation and amortization
116,107
112,452
231,737
222,043
Other regulatory charges (credits) - net
(2,521
)
13,836
(76,708
)
11,577
TOTAL
889,655
805,282
1,617,790
1,578,809
OPERATING INCOME
193,779
193,752
346,427
375,370
OTHER INCOME
Allowance for equity funds used during construction
11,109
4,506
21,099
11,744
Interest and investment income
41,919
40,251
81,749
77,667
Miscellaneous - net
(2,650
)
(1,870
)
(5,674
)
(5,615
)
TOTAL
50,378
42,887
97,174
83,796
INTEREST EXPENSE
Interest expense
68,483
70,787
135,798
135,863
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction
(5,541
)
(2,383
)
(10,715
)
(6,280
)
TOTAL
62,942
68,404
125,083
129,583
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES
181,215
168,235
318,518
329,583
Income taxes
56,736
(85,090
)
99,661
(35,348
)
NET INCOME
$124,479
$253,325
$218,857
$364,931
See Notes to Financial Statements.
117
Table of Contents
ENTERGY LOUISIANA, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended
Six Months Ended
2017
2016
2017
2016
(In Thousands)
(In Thousands)
Net Income
$124,479
$253,325
$218,857
$364,931
Other comprehensive loss
Pension and other postretirement liabilities (net of tax benefit of $292, $144, $524, and $259)
(310
)
(230
)
(680
)
(493
)
Other comprehensive loss
(310
)
(230
)
(680
)
(493
)
Comprehensive Income
$124,169
$253,095
$218,177
$364,438
See Notes to Financial Statements.
118
Table of Contents
ENTERGY LOUISIANA, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited)
2017
2016
(In Thousands)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income
$218,857
$364,931
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flow provided by operating activities:
Depreciation, amortization, and decommissioning, including nuclear fuel amortization
300,805
301,815
Deferred income taxes, investment tax credits, and non-current taxes accrued
220,492
(49,661
)
Changes in working capital:
Receivables
950
(72,931
)
Fuel inventory
4,534
(5,053
)
Accounts payable
42,079
(22,830
)
Prepaid taxes and taxes accrued
52,686
23,850
Interest accrued
(2,883
)
(4,216
)
Deferred fuel costs
(74,113
)
4,093
Other working capital accounts
(61,515
)
(26,514
)
Changes in provisions for estimated losses
(6,108
)
1,734
Changes in other regulatory assets
39,711
58,429
Changes in other regulatory liabilities
(64,293
)
30,116
Changes in pension and other postretirement liabilities
(38,175
)
(35,869
)
Other
(99,272
)
(127,538
)
Net cash flow provided by operating activities
533,755
440,356
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Construction expenditures
(755,158
)
(403,387
)
Allowance for equity funds used during construction
21,099
11,744
Payment for purchase of plant
—
(473,956
)
Nuclear fuel purchases
(156,246
)
(38,773
)
Proceeds from the sale of nuclear fuel
28,884
64,498
Receipts from storm reserve escrow account
8,836
—
Payments to storm reserve escrow account
(802
)
—
Changes to securitization account
79
225
Proceeds from nuclear decommissioning trust fund sales
125,600
123,546
Investment in nuclear decommissioning trust funds
(144,768
)
(143,091
)
Changes in money pool receivable - net
(33,039
)
(168
)
Insurance proceeds
5,305
—
Changes in other investments - net
—
(544
)
Net cash flow used in investing activities
(900,210
)
(859,906
)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt
532,219
1,128,580
Retirement of long-term debt
(101,789
)
(559,839
)
Changes in credit borrowings - net
30,696
(888
)
Distributions paid:
Common equity
(91,250
)
(105,500
)
Other
(1,988
)
(3,100
)
Net cash flow provided by financing activities
367,888
459,253
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
1,433
39,703
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
213,850
35,102
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$215,283
$74,805
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid (received) during the period for:
Interest - net of amount capitalized
$134,513
$196,514
Income taxes
($116,937
)
$62,676
See Notes to Financial Statements.
119
Table of Contents
ENTERGY LOUISIANA, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016
(Unaudited)
2017
2016
(In Thousands)
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents:
Cash
$3,419
$49,972
Temporary cash investments
211,864
163,878
Total cash and cash equivalents
215,283
213,850
Accounts receivable:
Customer
222,291
213,517
Allowance for doubtful accounts
(7,459
)
(6,277
)
Associated companies
173,665
155,794
Other
44,855
54,186
Accrued unbilled revenues
170,863
159,176
Total accounts receivable
604,215
576,396
Deferred fuel costs
25,902
—
Fuel inventory
46,204
50,738
Materials and supplies - at average cost
289,985
294,421
Deferred nuclear refueling outage costs
94,772
22,535
Prepaid taxes
57,418
110,104
Prepayments and other
59,527
41,687
TOTAL
1,393,306
1,309,731
OTHER PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS
Investment in affiliate preferred membership interests
1,390,587
1,390,587
Decommissioning trust funds
1,220,699
1,140,707
Storm reserve escrow account
283,451
291,485
Non-utility property - at cost (less accumulated depreciation)
231,512
217,494
Other
24,481
28,844
TOTAL
3,150,730
3,069,117
UTILITY PLANT
Electric
19,117,749
18,827,532
Natural gas
178,932
172,816
Construction work in progress
919,336
670,201
Nuclear fuel
361,502
249,807
TOTAL UTILITY PLANT
20,577,519
19,920,356
Less - accumulated depreciation and amortization
8,530,511
8,420,596
UTILITY PLANT - NET
12,047,008
11,499,760
DEFERRED DEBITS AND OTHER ASSETS
Regulatory assets:
Regulatory asset for income taxes - net
475,836
470,480
Other regulatory assets (includes securitization property of $83,050 as of June 30, 2017 and $92,951 as of December 31, 2016)
1,122,991
1,168,058
Deferred fuel costs
168,122
168,122
Other
20,420
16,003
TOTAL
1,787,369
1,822,663
TOTAL ASSETS
$18,378,413
$17,701,271
See Notes to Financial Statements.
120
Table of Contents
ENTERGY LOUISIANA, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016
(Unaudited)
2017
2016
(In Thousands)
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Currently maturing long-term debt
$517,706
$200,198
Short-term borrowings
34,490
3,794
Accounts payable:
Associated companies
75,909
82,106
Other
334,472
358,741
Customer deposits
146,633
148,601
Interest accrued
72,715
75,598
Deferred fuel costs
—
48,211
Other
101,702
80,013
TOTAL
1,283,627
997,262
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accumulated deferred income taxes and taxes accrued
2,910,546
2,691,118
Accumulated deferred investment tax credits
124,306
126,741
Other regulatory liabilities
816,681
880,974
Decommissioning
1,111,194
1,082,685
Accumulated provisions
304,664
310,772
Pension and other postretirement liabilities
741,841
780,278
Long-term debt (includes securitization bonds of $89,364 as of June 30, 2017 and $99,217 as of December 31, 2016)
5,728,309
5,612,593
Other
148,536
137,039
TOTAL
11,886,077
11,622,200
Commitments and Contingencies
EQUITY
Member's equity
5,257,831
5,130,251
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
(49,122
)
(48,442
)
TOTAL
5,208,709
5,081,809
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
$18,378,413
$17,701,271
See Notes to Financial Statements.
121
Table of Contents
ENTERGY LOUISIANA, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited)
Common Equity
Member’s
Equity
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss
Total
(In Thousands)
Balance at December 31, 2015
$4,793,724
($56,412
)
$4,737,312
Net income
364,931
—
364,931
Other comprehensive loss
—
(493
)
(493
)
Distributions declared on common equity
(105,500
)
—
(105,500
)
Other
(15
)
—
(15
)
Balance at June 30, 2016
$5,053,140
($56,905
)
$4,996,235
Balance at December 31, 2016
$5,130,251
($48,442
)
$5,081,809
Net income
218,857
—
218,857
Other comprehensive loss
—
(680
)
(680
)
Distributions declared on common equity
(91,250
)
—
(91,250
)
Other
(27
)
—
(27
)
Balance at June 30, 2017
$5,257,831
($49,122
)
$5,208,709
See Notes to Financial Statements.
122
Table of Contents
ENTERGY LOUISIANA, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
SELECTED OPERATING RESULTS
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended
Increase/
Description
2017
2016
(Decrease)
%
(Dollars In Millions)
Electric Operating Revenues:
Residential
$279
$246
$33
13
Commercial
236
212
24
11
Industrial
394
319
75
24
Governmental
17
16
1
6
Total retail
926
793
133
17
Sales for resale:
Associated companies
73
105
(32
)
(30
)
Non-associated companies
16
18
(2
)
(11
)
Other
57
74
(17
)
(23
)
Total
$1,072
$990
$82
8
Billed Electric Energy Sales (GWh):
Residential
3,001
2,919
82
3
Commercial
2,729
2,693
36
1
Industrial
7,684
7,294
390
5
Governmental
194
195
(1
)
(1
)
Total retail
13,608
13,101
507
4
Sales for resale:
Associated companies
1,241
2,175
(934
)
(43
)
Non-associated companies
369
698
(329
)
(47
)
Total
15,218
15,974
(756
)
(5
)
Six Months Ended
Increase/
Description
2017
2016
(Decrease)
%
(Dollars In Millions)
Electric Operating Revenues:
Residential
$500
$500
$—
—
Commercial
431
421
10
2
Industrial
719
645
74
11
Governmental
32
32
—
—
Total retail
1,682
1,598
84
5
Sales for resale:
Associated companies
135
194
(59
)
(30
)
Non-associated companies
30
24
6
25
Other
89
110
(21
)
(19
)
Total
$1,936
$1,926
$10
1
Billed Electric Energy Sales (GWh):
Residential
5,853
5,973
(120
)
(2
)
Commercial
5,269
5,259
10
—
Industrial
14,645
14,317
328
2
Governmental
387
394
(7
)
(2
)
Total retail
26,154
25,943
211
1
Sales for resale:
Associated companies
2,235
3,744
(1,509
)
(40
)
Non-associated companies
664
986
(322
)
(33
)
Total
29,053
30,673
(1,620
)
(5
)
123
Table of Contents
ENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Results of Operations
Net Income
Second Quarter
2017
Compared to
Second Quarter
2016
Net income decreased $3.9 million primarily due to higher taxes other than income taxes, lower net revenue, and a higher effective income tax rate, partially offset by lower interest expense.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2017
Compared to
Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
Net income decreased $3.9 million primarily due to higher taxes other than income taxes, higher depreciation and amortization expenses, higher other operation and maintenance expenses, and a higher effective income tax rate, partially offset by lower interest expense.
Net Revenue
Second Quarter
2017
Compared to
Second Quarter
2016
Net revenue consists of operating revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale, 2) purchased power expenses, and 3) other regulatory credits. Following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing the
second quarter
2017
to the
second quarter
2016
:
Amount
(In Millions)
2016 net revenue
$176.8
Volume/weather
(8.0
)
Retail electric price
4.9
Other
0.5
2017 net revenue
$174.2
The volume/weather variance is primarily due to decreased usage during the unbilled sales period, including the effect of weather. This decrease was partially offset by an increase of 96 GWh, or 3%, in billed electricity usage, including the effect of more favorable weather on residential sales and an increase in industrial usage.
The increase in industrial usage is primarily due to an increase in usage by the mid to small industrial sector, expansion projects in the pulp and paper industry, and new customers in the wood products industry.
The retail electric price variance is primarily due to a $19.4 million net annual increase in rates, as approved by the MPSC, effective with the first billing cycle of July 2016. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the formula rate plan.
124
Table of Contents
Entergy Mississippi, Inc.
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Six Months Ended June 30, 2017
Compared to
Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
Net revenue consists of operating revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale, 2) purchased power expenses, and 3) other regulatory credits. Following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing the
six months ended June 30, 2017
to the
six months ended June 30, 2016
:
Amount
(In Millions)
2016 net revenue
$326.4
Retail electric price
11.2
Volume/weather
(10.3
)
Other
1.0
2017 net revenue
$328.3
The retail electric price variance is primarily due to a $19.4 million net annual increase in rates, as approved by the MPSC, effective with the first billing cycle of July 2016. See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the formula rate plan.
The volume/weather variance is primarily due to decreased usage during the billed and unbilled sales periods, including the effect of weather, primarily in the residential and commercial sectors, partially offset by an increase in industrial usage. The increase in industrial usage is primarily due to an increase in usage by the mid to small industrial sector, expansion projects in the pulp and paper industry, and new customers in the wood products industry.
Other Income Statement Variances
Second Quarter
2017
Compared to
Second Quarter
2016
Other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to
a decrease of $1.7 million in storm damage provisions and a decrease of $1.6 million in loss provisions. The decrease was partially offset by an increase of $2 million in fossil-fueled generation expenses primarily due to a higher scope of work done in 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion on storm cost recovery.
Taxes other than income taxes increased primarily due to the MPSC’s June 2016 approval of a revised ad valorem tax rider allowing Entergy Mississippi to recover the difference in 2016 ad valorem tax expense and the amount approved in base rates in the 2016 formula rate plan order. See Note 2 in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the ad valorem tax rider.
Interest expense decreased primarily due to the refinancing at lower interest rates of certain first mortgage bonds in 2016 and the retirement, at maturity, of $125 million of 3.25% Series first mortgage bonds in June 2016. See Note 5 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for details of long-term debt.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2017
Compared to
Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
Other operation and maintenance expenses increased primarily due to
an increase of $2.5 million in fossil-fueled generation expenses primarily due to a higher scope of work done in 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 and
an increase of $1.9 million in energy efficiency costs
. The increase was partially offset by a decrease of $1.7 million in storm damage provisions. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion on storm cost recovery.
125
Table of Contents
Entergy Mississippi, Inc.
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Taxes other than income taxes increased primarily due to the MPSC’s June 2016 approval of a revised ad valorem tax rider allowing Entergy Mississippi to recover the difference in 2016 ad valorem tax expense and the amount approved in base rates in the 2016 formula rate plan order. See Note 2 in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the ad valorem tax rider.
Depreciation and amortization expenses increased primarily due to additions to plants in service.
Interest expense decreased primarily due to the refinancing at lower interest rates of certain first mortgage bonds in 2016 and the retirement, at maturity, of $125 million of 3.25% Series first mortgage bonds in June 2016. See Note 5 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for details of long-term debt.
Income Taxes
The effective income tax rate was
37.6%
for the
second quarter
2017
. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the
second quarter
2017
versus the federal statutory rate of 35% was primarily due to state income taxes, partially offset by book and tax differences related to the allowance for equity funds used during construction.
The effective income tax rate was
39.0%
for the
six months ended June 30, 2017
. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the
six months ended June 30, 2017
versus the federal statutory rate of 35% was primarily due to state income taxes and a write-off of a stock-based compensation deferred tax asset, partially offset by book and tax differences related to the allowance for equity funds used during construction.
The effective income tax rate was
32.7%
for the
second quarter
2016
. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the
second quarter
2016
versus the federal statutory rate of 35% was primarily due to certain book and tax differences related to utility plant items, partially offset by state income taxes.
The effective income tax rate was
35.2%
for the
six months ended June 30, 2016
. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the
six months ended June 30, 2016
versus the federal statutory rate of 35% was primarily due to state income taxes, partially offset by certain book and tax differences related to utility plant items.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Flow
Cash flows for the
six months ended
June 30, 2017
and
2016
were as follows:
2017
2016
(In Thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
$76,834
$145,605
Cash flow provided by (used in):
Operating activities
53,839
77,063
Investing activities
(185,687
)
(128,241
)
Financing activities
55,736
14,126
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
(76,112
)
(37,052
)
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$722
$108,553
126
Table of Contents
Entergy Mississippi, Inc.
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Operating Activities
Net cash flow provided by operating activities decreased $23.2 million for the
six months ended
June 30, 2017
compared to the
six months ended
June 30, 2016
primarily due to the timing of payments to vendors and the timing of recovery of fuel and purchased power costs in 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016. The decrease was partially offset by an increase of $11.5 million in income tax refunds in 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016. Entergy Mississippi received state income tax refunds of $15.1 million in 2017 and $3.6 million in 2016 in accordance with an intercompany income tax allocation agreement. The income tax refunds in 2017 resulted from the carryback of net operating losses.
Investing Activities
Net cash flow used in investing activities increased $57.4 million for the
six months ended
June 30, 2017
compared to the
six months ended
June 30, 2016
primarily due to:
•
an increase of $41.5 million in transmission construction expenditures primarily due to a higher scope of work performed in 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016;
•
an increase of $10.4 million in distribution construction expenditures primarily due to a higher scope of non-storm related work performed in 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016; and
•
an increase of $7.4 million in storm spending in 2017.
Financing Activities
Net cash flow provided by financing activities increased $41.6 million for the
six months ended
June 30, 2017
compared to the
six months ended
June 30, 2016
primarily due to money pool activity and $24 million in common stock dividends paid in 2016, partially offset by the net issuance of $39.5 million of long-term debt in 2016. The decrease in dividends paid was primarily because of lower operating cash flow and higher capital expenditures, each discussed above. See Note 5 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for details of long-term debt.
Increases in Entergy Mississippi’s payable to the money pool are a source of cash flow, and Entergy Mississippi’s payable to the money pool increased by $56.3 million for the
six months ended
June 30, 2017
. The money pool is an inter-company borrowing arrangement designed to reduce the Utility subsidiaries’ need for external short-term borrowings.
Capital Structure
Entergy Mississippi’s capitalization is balanced between equity and debt, as shown in the following table.
June 30, 2017
December 31, 2016
Debt to capital
49.2
%
50.2
%
Effect of subtracting cash
—
%
(1.8
%)
Net debt to net capital
49.2
%
48.4
%
Net debt consists of debt less cash and cash equivalents. Debt consists of short-term borrowings, capital lease obligations, and long-term debt, including the currently maturing portion. Capital consists of debt, preferred stock without sinking fund, and common equity. Net capital consists of capital less cash and cash equivalents. Entergy Mississippi uses the debt to capital ratio in analyzing its financial condition and believes it provides useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating Entergy Mississippi’s financial condition. Entergy Mississippi uses the net debt to net capital ratio in analyzing its financial condition and believes it provides useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating Entergy Mississippi’s financial condition because net debt indicates Entergy Mississippi’s outstanding debt position that could not be readily satisfied by cash and cash equivalents on hand.
127
Table of Contents
Entergy Mississippi, Inc.
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Uses and Sources of Capital
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
Liquidity and Capital Resources
”
in the Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy Mississippi’s uses and sources of capital. Following are updates to the information provided in the Form 10-K.
Entergy Mississippi’s receivables from or (payables to) the money pool were as follows:
June 30, 2017
December 31, 2016
June 30, 2016
December 31, 2015
(In Thousands)
($56,299)
$10,595
$13,514
$25,930
See Note 4 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a description of the money pool.
Entergy Mississippi has four separate credit facilities in the aggregate amount of $102.5 million scheduled to expire in May 2018. No borrowings were outstanding under the credit facilities as of
June 30, 2017
. In addition, Entergy Mississippi is a party to an uncommitted letter of credit facility as a means to post collateral to support its obligations to MISO. As of
June 30, 2017
, a $7.8 million letter of credit was outstanding under Entergy Mississippi’s uncommitted letter of credit facility. See Note 4 to the financial statements herein for additional discussion of the credit facilities.
State and Local Rate Regulation and Fuel-Cost Recovery
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
State and Local Rate Regulation and Fuel-Cost Recovery
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the formula rate plan and fuel and purchased power cost recovery. The following are updates to that discussion.
Formula Rate Plan
In March 2017, Entergy Mississippi submitted its formula rate plan 2017 test year filing and 2016 look-back filing showing Entergy Mississippi’s earned return for the historical 2016 calendar year and projected earned return for the 2017 calendar year to be within the formula rate plan bandwidth, resulting in no change in rates. In June 2017, Entergy Mississippi and the Mississippi Public Utilities Staff entered into a stipulation that confirmed that Entergy Mississippi’s earned returns for both the 2016 look-back filing and 2017 test year were within the respective formula rate plan bandwidths. In June 2017 the MPSC approved the stipulation, which resulted in no change in rates.
Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) Filing
As discussed in the Form 10-K, in November 2016, Entergy Mississippi filed an application seeking a finding from the MPSC that Entergy Mississippi’s deployment of advanced metering infrastructure is in the public interest. In May 2017 the Mississippi Public Utilities Staff and Entergy Mississippi entered into and filed a joint stipulation supporting Entergy Mississippi’s filing, and the MPSC issued an order approving the filing without any material changes, finding that Entergy Mississippi’s deployment of AMI is in the public interest and granting a certificate of public convenience and necessity. The MPSC order also confirmed that Entergy Mississippi shall continue to include in rate base the remaining book value of existing meters that will be retired as part of the AMI deployment and also to depreciate those assets using current depreciation rates.
Mississippi Attorney General Complaint
As discussed in the Form 10-K, the Mississippi attorney general filed a complaint in state court in December 2008 against Entergy Corporation, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy Services, and Entergy Power. The defendants have
128
Table of Contents
Entergy Mississippi, Inc.
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
denied the allegations. In June 2017 the District Court issued a case management order setting a trial date in November 2018. Discovery is currently in progress.
Federal Regulation
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –
Federal Regulation
”
in the Form 10-K for a discussion of federal regulation.
Nuclear Matters
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
Nuclear Matters
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of nuclear matters.
Environmental Risks
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –
Environmental Risks
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of environmental risks.
Critical Accounting Estimates
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
Critical Accounting Estimates
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the estimates and judgments necessary in Entergy Mississippi’s accounting for utility regulatory accounting, unbilled revenue, impairment of long-lived assets and trust fund investments, taxation and uncertain tax positions, qualified pension and other postretirement benefits, and other contingencies.
New Accounting Pronouncements
See “
New Accounting Pronouncements
” section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis for further discussion.
129
Table of Contents
ENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, INC.
INCOME STATEMENTS
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended
Six Months Ended
2017
2016
2017
2016
(In Thousands)
(In Thousands)
OPERATING REVENUES
Electric
$291,212
$248,138
$549,655
$511,184
OPERATING EXPENSES
Operation and Maintenance:
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
46,048
(34
)
85,188
61,346
Purchased power
75,253
74,361
146,323
129,744
Other operation and maintenance
59,535
60,381
114,708
111,654
Taxes other than income taxes
23,978
20,487
47,950
43,984
Depreciation and amortization
35,442
34,010
70,759
67,308
Other regulatory credits - net
(4,306
)
(2,957
)
(10,143
)
(6,315
)
TOTAL
235,950
186,248
454,785
407,721
OPERATING INCOME
55,262
61,890
94,870
103,463
OTHER INCOME
Allowance for equity funds used during construction
2,332
1,345
4,175
2,631
Interest and investment income
7
240
33
361
Miscellaneous - net
(553
)
(1,050
)
(978
)
(1,755
)
TOTAL
1,786
535
3,230
1,237
INTEREST EXPENSE
Interest expense
12,568
15,258
25,240
30,000
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction
(913
)
(691
)
(1,633
)
(1,358
)
TOTAL
11,655
14,567
23,607
28,642
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES
45,393
47,858
74,493
76,058
Income taxes
17,090
15,664
29,032
26,746
NET INCOME
28,303
32,194
45,461
49,312
Preferred dividend requirements and other
239
707
477
1,414
EARNINGS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCK
$28,064
$31,487
$44,984
$47,898
See Notes to Financial Statements.
130
Table of Contents
ENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, INC.
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited)
2017
2016
(In Thousands)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income
$45,461
$49,312
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flow provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization
70,759
67,308
Deferred income taxes, investment tax credits, and non-current taxes accrued
31,740
21,934
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Receivables
(7,952
)
(24,273
)
Fuel inventory
6,312
(5,040
)
Accounts payable
(1,398
)
21,359
Taxes accrued
(21,361
)
(20,417
)
Interest accrued
40
(584
)
Deferred fuel costs
(13,622
)
108
Other working capital accounts
(1,473
)
(8,266
)
Provisions for estimated losses
(6,699
)
(188
)
Other regulatory assets
(26,958
)
(1,913
)
Pension and other postretirement liabilities
(10,692
)
(10,922
)
Other assets and liabilities
(10,318
)
(11,355
)
Net cash flow provided by operating activities
53,839
77,063
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Construction expenditures
(199,873
)
(143,171
)
Allowance for equity funds used during construction
4,175
2,631
Changes in money pool receivable - net
10,595
12,416
Other
(584
)
(117
)
Net cash flow used in investing activities
(185,687
)
(128,241
)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt
—
371,940
Retirement of long-term debt
—
(332,400
)
Change in money pool payable - net
56,299
—
Dividends paid:
Common stock
—
(24,000
)
Preferred stock
(477
)
(1,414
)
Other
(86
)
—
Net cash flow provided by financing activities
55,736
14,126
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
(76,112
)
(37,052
)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
76,834
145,605
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$722
$108,553
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid (received) during the period for:
Interest - net of amount capitalized
$24,021
$29,157
Income taxes
($15,087
)
($3,561
)
See Notes to Financial Statements.
131
Table of Contents
ENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, INC.
BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016
(Unaudited)
2017
2016
(In Thousands)
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents:
Cash
$715
$16
Temporary cash investments
7
76,818
Total cash and cash equivalents
722
76,834
Accounts receivable:
Customer
57,539
51,218
Allowance for doubtful accounts
(540
)
(549
)
Associated companies
34,939
45,973
Other
8,223
12,006
Accrued unbilled revenues
57,170
51,327
Total accounts receivable
157,331
159,975
Deferred fuel costs
20,579
6,957
Fuel inventory - at average cost
44,560
50,872
Materials and supplies - at average cost
42,065
41,146
Prepayments and other
15,742
8,873
TOTAL
280,999
344,657
OTHER PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS
Non-utility property - at cost (less accumulated depreciation)
4,600
4,608
Escrow accounts
31,875
31,783
TOTAL
36,475
36,391
UTILITY PLANT
Electric
4,409,179
4,321,214
Property under capital lease
873
1,590
Construction work in progress
176,623
118,182
TOTAL UTILITY PLANT
4,586,675
4,440,986
Less - accumulated depreciation and amortization
1,626,005
1,602,711
UTILITY PLANT - NET
2,960,670
2,838,275
DEFERRED DEBITS AND OTHER ASSETS
Regulatory assets:
Regulatory asset for income taxes - net
39,337
38,284
Other regulatory assets
368,118
342,213
Other
3,549
2,320
TOTAL
411,004
382,817
TOTAL ASSETS
$3,689,148
$3,602,140
See Notes to Financial Statements.
132
Table of Contents
ENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, INC.
BALANCE SHEETS
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016
(Unaudited)
2017
2016
(In Thousands)
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payable:
Associated companies
$99,489
$43,647
Other
73,037
80,227
Customer deposits
83,928
84,112
Taxes accrued
42,679
64,040
Interest accrued
21,693
21,653
Other
15,465
9,554
TOTAL
336,291
303,233
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accumulated deferred income taxes and taxes accrued
892,081
861,331
Accumulated deferred investment tax credits
8,587
8,667
Asset retirement cost liabilities
8,967
8,722
Accumulated provisions
47,741
54,440
Pension and other postretirement liabilities
98,865
109,551
Long-term debt
1,121,356
1,120,916
Other
15,104
20,108
TOTAL
2,192,701
2,183,735
Commitments and Contingencies
Preferred stock without sinking fund
20,381
20,381
COMMON EQUITY
Common stock, no par value, authorized 12,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 8,666,357 shares in 2017 and 2016
199,326
199,326
Capital stock expense and other
167
167
Retained earnings
940,282
895,298
TOTAL
1,139,775
1,094,791
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
$3,689,148
$3,602,140
See Notes to Financial Statements.
133
Table of Contents
ENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, INC.
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN COMMON EQUITY
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited)
Common Equity
Common
Stock
Capital Stock
Expense and
Other
Retained
Earnings
Total
(In Thousands)
Balance at December 31, 2015
$199,326
($690
)
$813,414
$1,012,050
Net income
—
—
49,312
49,312
Common stock dividends
—
—
(24,000
)
(24,000
)
Preferred stock dividends
—
—
(1,414
)
(1,414
)
Balance at June 30, 2016
$199,326
($690
)
$837,312
$1,035,948
Balance at December 31, 2016
$199,326
$167
$895,298
$1,094,791
Net income
—
—
45,461
45,461
Preferred stock dividends
—
—
(477
)
(477
)
Balance at June 30, 2017
$199,326
$167
$940,282
$1,139,775
See Notes to Financial Statements.
134
Table of Contents
ENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, INC.
SELECTED OPERATING RESULTS
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended
Increase/
Description
2017
2016
(Decrease)
%
(Dollars In Millions)
Electric Operating Revenues:
Residential
$111
$88
$23
26
Commercial
101
81
20
25
Industrial
38
29
9
31
Governmental
10
9
1
11
Total retail
260
207
53
26
Sales for resale:
Non-associated companies
7
5
2
40
Other
24
36
(12
)
(33
)
Total
$291
$248
$43
17
Billed Electric Energy Sales (GWh):
Residential
1,135
1,085
50
5
Commercial
1,142
1,126
16
1
Industrial
618
587
31
5
Governmental
101
102
(1
)
(1
)
Total retail
2,996
2,900
96
3
Sales for resale:
Non-associated companies
312
243
69
28
Total
3,308
3,143
165
5
Six Months Ended
Increase/
Description
2017
2016
(Decrease)
%
(Dollars In Millions)
Electric Operating Revenues:
Residential
$222
$204
$18
9
Commercial
193
173
20
12
Industrial
74
63
11
17
Governmental
19
19
—
—
Total retail
508
459
49
11
Sales for resale:
Non-associated companies
12
10
2
20
Other
30
42
(12
)
(29
)
Total
$550
$511
$39
8
Billed Electric Energy Sales (GWh):
Residential
2,325
2,370
(45
)
(2
)
Commercial
2,204
2,205
(1
)
—
Industrial
1,204
1,136
68
6
Governmental
199
200
(1
)
(1
)
Total retail
5,932
5,911
21
—
Sales for resale:
Non-associated companies
493
375
118
31
Total
6,425
6,286
139
2
135
Table of Contents
ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Results of Operations
Net Income
Second Quarter 2017 Compared to Second Quarter 2016
Net income increased $3 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses and a lower effective income tax rate, partially offset by higher taxes other than income taxes.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
Net income increased $2.9 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses and a lower effective income tax rate, partially offset by higher taxes other than income taxes.
Net Revenue
Second Quarter 2017 Compared to Second Quarter 2016
Net revenue consists of operating revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale, 2) purchased power expenses, and 3) other regulatory charges. Following is an analysis of the changes in net revenue comparing the
second
quarter 2017 to the
second
quarter 2016:
Amount
(In Millions)
2016 net revenue
$80.4
Retail electric price
(2.3
)
Other
1.2
2017 net revenue
$79.3
The retail electric price variance is primarily due to a decrease in the purchased power and capacity acquisition cost recovery rider primarily due to credits to customers as part of the Entergy New Orleans internal restructuring agreement in principle, effective with the first billing cycle of June 2017. See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the credits associated with Entergy New Orleans’s internal restructuring.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
Net revenue consists of operating revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale, 2) purchased power expenses, and 3) other regulatory charges. Following is an analysis of the changes in net revenue comparing the six months ended June 30, 2017 to the six months ended June 30, 2016:
Amount
(In Millions)
2016 net revenue
$148.4
Retail electric price
3.0
Volume/weather
(3.1
)
Other
1.2
2017 net revenue
$149.5
136
Table of Contents
Entergy New Orleans, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
The retail electric price variance is primarily due to an increase in the purchased power and capacity acquisition cost recovery rider, as approved by the City Council, effective with the first billing cycle of March 2016, primarily related to the purchase of Power Block 1 of the Union Power Station in March 2016. The increase was partially offset by credits to customers as part of the Entergy New Orleans internal restructuring agreement in principle, effective with the first billing cycle of June 2017. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the purchased power and capacity acquisition cost recovery rider and see Note 2 to the financial statements herein for further discussion of the credits associated with Entergy New Orleans’s internal restructuring.
The volume/weather variance is primarily due to decreased usage during the unbilled sales period, including the effect of weather, and a decrease of 27 GWh, or 1%, in billed electricity usage, primarily in the residential sector.
Other Income Statement Variances
Second Quarter 2017 Compared to Second Quarter 2016
Other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to:
•
a decrease of $2.4 million in other loss provisions; and
•
a decrease of $2 million in fossil-fueled generation expenses primarily due to the deactivation of Michoud Units 2 and 3 effective May 2016 and asbestos loss provisions recorded in second quarter 2016.
Taxes other than income taxes increased primarily due to an increase in local franchise taxes resulting from higher electric retail revenues in 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 and an increase in ad valorem taxes resulting from higher assessments, including the assessment of Arkansas ad valorem taxes on the Union Power Station beginning in 2017.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
Other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to:
•
a decrease of $2.8 million in fossil-fueled generation expenses primarily due to the deactivation of Michoud Units 2 and 3 effective May 2016 and asbestos loss provisions recorded in 2016, partially offset by an increase as a result of the purchase of Power Block 1 of the Union Power Station in March 2016; and
•
a decrease of $2 million in other loss provisions.
Taxes other than income taxes increased primarily due to an increase in local franchise taxes resulting from higher electric retail revenues in 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 and an increase in ad valorem taxes resulting from higher assessments, including the assessment of Arkansas ad valorem taxes on the Union Power Station beginning in 2017, partially offset by higher capitalized taxes.
Income Taxes
The effective income tax rates were 35.8% for the second quarter 2017 and 36.1% for the six months ended June 30, 2017. The differences in the effective income tax rates for the second quarter 2017 and the six months ended June 30, 2017 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% were primarily due to state income taxes and certain book and tax differences related to utility plant items, partially offset by flow-through tax accounting.
The effective income tax rates were 44.5% for the second quarter 2016 and 41.2% for the six months ended June 30, 2016. The differences in the effective income tax rates for the second quarter 2016 and the six months ended June 30, 2016 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% were primarily due to state income taxes and certain book and tax differences related to utility plant items, partially offset by flow-through tax accounting.
137
Table of Contents
Entergy New Orleans, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Flow
Cash flows for the
six months ended
June 30, 2017
and
2016
were as follows:
2017
2016
(In Thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
$103,068
$88,876
Cash flow provided by (used in):
Operating activities
36,750
39,268
Investing activities
(49,005
)
(258,036
)
Financing activities
(29,284
)
154,510
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
(41,539
)
(64,258
)
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$61,529
$24,618
Operating Activities
Net cash flow provided by operating activities decreased $2.5 million for the
six months ended
June 30, 2017
compared to the
six months ended
June 30, 2016
primarily due to the timing of payments to vendors and an increase in interest paid in 2017 as compared to 2016. The decrease was substantially offset by the timing of recovery of fuel and purchased power costs in 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 and income tax payments of $2.5 million in 2016 primarily due to payments made for state tax liabilities.
Investing Activities
Net cash flow used in investing activities decreased $209 million for the
six months ended
June 30, 2017
compared to the
six months ended
June 30, 2016
primarily due to the purchase of Power Block 1 of the Union Power Station for approximately $237 million in March 2016, partially offset by money pool activity and an increase of $7.7 million in storm spending in 2017. See Note 14 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of the Union Power Station purchase.
Increases in Entergy New Orleans’s receivable from the money pool are a use of cash flow, and Entergy New Orleans’s receivable from the money pool increased $1.7 million in 2017 compared to decreasing $12.8 million in 2016. The money pool is an inter-company borrowing arrangement designed to reduce the Utility subsidiaries’ need for external short-term borrowings.
Financing Activities
Entergy New Orleans’s financing activities used $29.3 million of cash for the
six months ended
June 30, 2017
compared to providing $154.5 million of cash for the
six months ended
June 30, 2016
primarily due to the following activity:
•
the issuance of $110 million of 5.50% Series first mortgage bonds in March 2016;
•
the issuance of $85 million of 4% Series first mortgage bonds in May 2016. Entergy New Orleans used the proceeds to pay, prior to maturity, its $33.271 million of 5.6% Series first mortgage bonds due September 2024 and to pay, prior to maturity, its $37.772 million of 5.65% Series first mortgage bonds due September 2029;
•
a $47.8 million capital contribution received from Entergy Corporation in March 2016 in anticipation of Entergy New Orleans’s purchase of Power Block 1 of the Union Power Station. See Note 14 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of the Union Power Station purchase; and
138
Table of Contents
Entergy New Orleans, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
•
$24.2 million in common stock dividends paid in 2017 as compared to $7 million in common stock dividends paid in 2016. There were no common stock dividends paid in first quarter 2016 in anticipation of the purchase of Power Block 1 of the Union Power Station in March 2016.
See Note 5 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for more details on long-term debt.
Capital Structure
Entergy New Orleans’s capitalization is balanced between equity and debt, as shown in the following table.
June 30,
2017
December 31,
2016
Debt to capital
49.8
%
50.1
%
Effect of excluding securitization bonds
(4.9
%)
(5.2
%)
Debt to capital, excluding securitization bonds (a)
44.9
%
44.9
%
Effect of subtracting cash
(4.6
%)
(8.0
%)
Net debt to net capital, excluding securitization bonds (a)
40.3
%
36.9
%
(a)
Calculation excludes the securitization bonds, which are non-recourse to Entergy New Orleans.
Net debt consists of debt less cash and cash equivalents. Debt consists of short-term borrowings, long-term debt, including the currently maturing portion, and the long-term payable to Entergy Louisiana. Capital consists of debt, preferred stock without sinking fund, and common equity. Net capital consists of capital less cash and cash equivalents. Entergy New Orleans uses the debt to capital ratios excluding securitization bonds in analyzing its financial condition and believes they provide useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating Entergy New Orleans’s financial condition because the securitization bonds are non-recourse to Entergy New Orleans, as more fully described in Note 5 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K. Entergy New Orleans also uses the net debt to net capital ratio excluding securitization bonds in analyzing its financial condition and believes it provides useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating Entergy New Orleans’s financial condition because net debt indicates Entergy New Orleans’s outstanding debt position that could not be readily satisfied by cash and cash equivalents on hand.
Uses and Sources of Capital
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
Liquidity and Capital Resources
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy New Orleans’s uses and sources of capital. Following are updates to the information provided in the Form 10-K.
Entergy New Orleans’s receivables from the money pool were as follows:
June 30,
2017
December 31,
2016
June 30,
2016
December 31,
2015
(In Thousands)
$15,960
$14,215
$3,007
$15,794
See Note 4 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a description of the money pool.
Entergy New Orleans has a credit facility in the amount of $25 million scheduled to expire in November 2018. The credit facility allows Entergy New Orleans to issue letters of credit against $10 million of the borrowing capacity of the facility. As of
June 30, 2017
, there were no cash borrowings and a $0.8 million letter of credit was outstanding under the facility. In addition, Entergy New Orleans is a party to an uncommitted letter of credit facility as a means to post collateral to support its obligations to MISO. As of
June 30, 2017
, a $5.6 million letter of credit was outstanding under Entergy New Orleans’s uncommitted letter of credit facility. See Note 4 to the financial statements herein for additional discussion of the credit facilities.
139
Table of Contents
Entergy New Orleans, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
New Orleans Power Station
In June 2016, Entergy New Orleans filed an application with the City Council seeking a public interest determination and authorization to construct the New Orleans Power Station, a 226 MW advanced combustion turbine in New Orleans, Louisiana, at the site of the existing Michoud generating facility, which facility was deactivated effective May 31, 2016. In January 2017 several intervenors filed testimony opposing the construction of the New Orleans Power Station on various grounds. In July 2017, Entergy New Orleans submitted a supplemental and amending application to the City Council seeking approval to construct either the originally proposed 226 MW advanced combustion turbine, or alternatively, a 128 MW unit composed of natural gas-fired reciprocating engines and a related cost recovery plan. The application included an updated cost estimate of $232 million for the 226 MW advanced combustion turbine. The cost estimate for the alternative 128 MW unit is $210 million. In addition, the application renewed the commitment to pursue up to 100 MW of renewable resources to serve New Orleans. In July 2017 the Utility Committee of the City Council established a procedural schedule that provides for a hearing in December 2017 and the City Council’s decision in February 2018. The commercial operation date is dependent on the alternative selected by the City Council and the receipt of other permits and approvals.
State and Local Rate Regulation
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –
State and Local Rate Regulation
”
in the Form 10-K for a discussion of state and local rate regulation. The following are updates to that discussion.
Retail Rates
As discussed in the Form 10-K, in February 2017, Entergy New Orleans filed a proposed implementation plan for the Energy Smart program from April 2017 through March 2020. As part of the proposal, Entergy New Orleans requested that the City Council identify its desired level of funding for the program during this time period and approve a cost recovery mechanism. In April 2017 the City Council approved an implementation plan for the Energy Smart program from April 2017 through December 2019. The City Council directed that the $11.8 million balance reported for Energy Smart funds be used to continue funding the program for Entergy New Orleans’s legacy customers and that the Energy Smart Algiers program continue to be funded through the Algiers fuel adjustment clause, until additional customer funding is required for the legacy customers. The City Council ordered Entergy New Orleans to submit a supplemental and amended implementation plan for program years 8 and 9 of the Energy Smart program (January 2018 through December 2019) in October 2017. Following that filing, the City Council will determine a specific cost recovery mechanism for the program for both legacy and Algiers customers. The City Council will not permit Entergy New Orleans to recover lost contribution to fixed costs for program years 7, 8, or 9 of the Energy Smart program.
Internal Restructuring
As discussed in the Form 10-K, in July 2016, Entergy New Orleans filed an application with the City Council seeking authorization to undertake a restructuring that would result in the transfer of substantially all of the assets and operations of Entergy New Orleans to a new entity, which would ultimately be owned by an existing Entergy subsidiary holding company. In May 2017 the City Council adopted a resolution approving the proposed internal restructuring pursuant to an agreement in principle with the City Council advisors and certain intervenors. Pursuant to the agreement in principle, Entergy New Orleans will credit retail customers $10 million in 2017, $1.4 million in the first quarter of the year after the transaction closes, and $117,500 each month in the second year after the transaction closes until such time as new base rates go into effect as a result of the anticipated 2018 base rate case. Entergy New Orleans began crediting retail customers in June 2017. Also pursuant to the agreement in principle, if FERC approval is received prior to December 31, 2018, Entergy New Orleans will provide additional credits to retail customers of $5 million in each of the years 2018, 2019, and 2020.
140
Table of Contents
Entergy New Orleans, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) Filing
As discussed in the Form 10-K, in October 2016, Entergy New Orleans filed an application seeking a finding from the City Council that Entergy New Orleans’s deployment of advanced electric and gas metering infrastructure is in the public interest. In April 2017, Entergy New Orleans received intervenor testimony that was generally supportive of AMI deployment. The City Council’s advisors filed testimony in May 2017 recommending the adoption of AMI subject to certain modifications, including the denial of Entergy New Orleans’s proposed customer charge as a cost recovery mechanism. In June 2017 the procedural schedule was suspended to allow for settlement discussions. A settlement status conference is scheduled for August 2017.
Federal Regulation
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –
Federal Regulation
”
in the Form 10-K for a discussion of federal regulation.
Nuclear Matters
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
Nuclear Matters
” in the Form 10-K for further discussion of nuclear matters.
Environmental Risks
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
Environmental Risks
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of environmental risks.
Critical Accounting Estimates
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
Critical Accounting Estimates
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the estimates and judgments necessary in Entergy New Orleans’s accounting for utility regulatory accounting, unbilled revenue, impairment of long-lived assets and trust fund investments, taxation and uncertain tax positions, qualified pension and other postretirement benefits, and other contingencies.
New Accounting Pronouncements
See “
New Accounting Pronouncements
” section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis for further discussion.
141
Table of Contents
ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended
Six Months Ended
2017
2016
2017
2016
(In Thousands)
(In Thousands)
OPERATING REVENUES
Electric
$157,455
$149,101
$299,800
$271,542
Natural gas
18,767
15,819
45,411
42,718
TOTAL
176,222
164,920
345,211
314,260
OPERATING EXPENSES
Operation and Maintenance:
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
22,961
12,554
53,036
23,475
Purchased power
73,105
70,583
141,464
139,108
Other operation and maintenance
25,296
28,659
47,808
51,501
Taxes other than income taxes
13,416
10,925
26,262
22,437
Depreciation and amortization
13,020
13,908
26,070
25,672
Other regulatory charges - net
818
1,378
1,203
3,274
TOTAL
148,616
138,007
295,843
265,467
OPERATING INCOME
27,606
26,913
49,368
48,793
OTHER INCOME
Allowance for equity funds used during construction
552
143
1,002
456
Interest and investment income
164
30
299
99
Miscellaneous - net
40
192
138
(53
)
TOTAL
756
365
1,439
502
INTEREST EXPENSE
Interest expense
5,356
5,984
10,699
10,357
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction
(193
)
(49
)
(351
)
(175
)
TOTAL
5,163
5,935
10,348
10,182
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES
23,199
21,343
40,459
39,113
Income taxes
8,317
9,500
14,599
16,103
NET INCOME
14,882
11,843
25,860
23,010
Preferred dividend requirements and other
241
241
482
482
EARNINGS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCK
$14,641
$11,602
$25,378
$22,528
See Notes to Financial Statements.
142
Table of Contents
ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited)
2017
2016
(In Thousands)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income
$25,860
$23,010
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flow provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization
26,070
25,672
Deferred income taxes, investment tax credits, and non-current taxes accrued
14,764
(2,665
)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Receivables
(5,979
)
(16,285
)
Fuel inventory
(465
)
1,822
Accounts payable
(8,761
)
6,362
Prepaid taxes and taxes accrued
38
36,982
Interest accrued
(469
)
255
Deferred fuel costs
2,087
(13,664
)
Other working capital accounts
(11,774
)
(7,310
)
Provisions for estimated losses
(1,794
)
1,804
Other regulatory assets
2,719
5,799
Pension and other postretirement liabilities
(8,049
)
(8,245
)
Other assets and liabilities
2,503
(14,269
)
Net cash flow provided by operating activities
36,750
39,268
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Construction expenditures
(48,683
)
(37,345
)
Allowance for equity funds used during construction
1,002
456
Payment for purchase of plant
—
(236,978
)
Investment in affiliates
—
(38
)
Changes in money pool receivable - net
(1,745
)
12,787
Receipts from storm reserve escrow account
—
3
Payments to storm reserve escrow account
(235
)
(206
)
Changes in securitization account
656
3,285
Net cash flow used in investing activities
(49,005
)
(258,036
)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt
—
190,672
Retirement of long-term debt
(5,114
)
(77,094
)
Capital contribution from parent
—
47,750
Dividends paid:
Common stock
(24,150
)
(7,000
)
Preferred stock
(482
)
(482
)
Other
462
664
Net cash flow provided by (used in) financing activities
(29,284
)
154,510
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
(41,539
)
(64,258
)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
103,068
88,876
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$61,529
$24,618
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest - net of amount capitalized
$10,637
$9,435
Income taxes
$—
$2,500
See Notes to Financial Statements.
143
Table of Contents
ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016
(Unaudited)
2017
2016
(In Thousands)
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash
$862
$28
Temporary cash investments
60,667
103,040
Total cash and cash equivalents
61,529
103,068
Securitization recovery trust account
1,082
1,738
Accounts receivable:
Customer
47,162
43,536
Allowance for doubtful accounts
(3,074
)
(3,059
)
Associated companies
18,045
16,811
Other
6,891
5,926
Accrued unbilled revenues
20,168
18,254
Total accounts receivable
89,192
81,468
Deferred fuel costs
2,731
4,818
Fuel inventory - at average cost
2,306
1,841
Materials and supplies - at average cost
10,494
8,416
Prepaid taxes
4,341
4,379
Prepayments and other
20,353
6,587
TOTAL
192,028
212,315
OTHER PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS
Non-utility property at cost (less accumulated depreciation)
1,016
1,016
Storm reserve escrow account
81,672
81,437
Other
4,787
7,160
TOTAL
87,475
89,613
UTILITY PLANT
Electric
1,262,714
1,258,934
Natural gas
247,742
240,408
Construction work in progress
38,314
24,975
TOTAL UTILITY PLANT
1,548,770
1,524,317
Less - accumulated depreciation and amortization
610,405
604,825
UTILITY PLANT - NET
938,365
919,492
DEFERRED DEBITS AND OTHER ASSETS
Regulatory assets:
Deferred fuel costs
4,080
4,080
Other regulatory assets (includes securitization property of $77,936 as of June 30, 2017 and $82,272 as of December 31, 2016)
265,387
268,106
Other
1,522
963
TOTAL
270,989
273,149
TOTAL ASSETS
$1,488,857
$1,494,569
See Notes to Financial Statements.
144
Table of Contents
ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016
(Unaudited)
2017
2016
(In Thousands)
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Payable due to Entergy Louisiana
$2,104
$2,104
Accounts payable:
Associated companies
41,981
39,260
Other
23,206
35,920
Customer deposits
28,773
28,667
Interest accrued
4,974
5,443
Other
13,006
11,415
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES
114,044
122,809
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accumulated deferred income taxes and taxes accrued
352,001
334,953
Accumulated deferred investment tax credits
559
622
Regulatory liability for income taxes - net
5,844
9,074
Asset retirement cost liabilities
2,974
2,875
Accumulated provisions
86,719
88,513
Pension and other postretirement liabilities
28,701
36,750
Long-term debt (includes securitization bonds of $79,784 as of June 30, 2017 and $84,776 as of December 31, 2016)
423,632
428,467
Long-term payable due to Entergy Louisiana
18,423
18,423
Gas system rebuild insurance proceeds
—
447
Other
8,006
4,910
TOTAL NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
926,859
925,034
Commitments and Contingencies
Preferred stock without sinking fund
19,780
19,780
COMMON EQUITY
Common stock, $4 par value, authorized 10,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 8,435,900 shares in 2017 and 2016
33,744
33,744
Paid-in capital
171,544
171,544
Retained earnings
222,886
221,658
TOTAL
428,174
426,946
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
$1,488,857
$1,494,569
See Notes to Financial Statements.
145
Table of Contents
ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN COMMON EQUITY
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited)
Common Equity
Common
Stock
Paid-in
Capital
Retained
Earnings
Total
(In Thousands)
Balance at December 31, 2015
$33,744
$123,794
$192,494
$350,032
Net income
—
—
23,010
23,010
Capital contribution from parent
—
47,750
—
47,750
Common stock dividends
—
—
(7,000
)
(7,000
)
Preferred stock dividends
—
—
(482
)
(482
)
Balance at June 30, 2016
$33,744
$171,544
$208,022
$413,310
Balance at December 31, 2016
$33,744
$171,544
$221,658
$426,946
Net income
—
—
25,860
25,860
Common stock dividends
—
—
(24,150
)
(24,150
)
Preferred stock dividends
—
—
(482
)
(482
)
Balance at June 30, 2017
$33,744
$171,544
$222,886
$428,174
See Notes to Financial Statements.
146
Table of Contents
ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SELECTED OPERATING RESULTS
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended
Increase/
Description
2017
2016
(Decrease)
%
(Dollars In Millions)
Electric Operating Revenues:
Residential
$56
$50
$6
12
Commercial
56
51
5
10
Industrial
9
8
1
13
Governmental
19
17
2
12
Total retail
140
126
14
11
Sales for resale:
Associated companies
—
12
(12
)
(100
)
Non-associated companies
9
1
8
800
Other
8
10
(2
)
(20
)
Total
$157
$149
$8
5
Billed Electric Energy Sales (GWh):
Residential
468
459
9
2
Commercial
541
538
3
1
Industrial
105
107
(2
)
(2
)
Governmental
188
190
(2
)
(1
)
Total retail
1,302
1,294
8
1
Sales for resale:
Associated companies
—
556
(556
)
(100
)
Non-associated companies
508
41
467
1,139
Total
1,810
1,891
(81
)
(4
)
Six Months Ended
Increase/
Description
2017
2016
(Decrease)
%
(Dollars In Millions)
Electric Operating Revenues:
Residential
$109
$97
$12
12
Commercial
110
95
15
16
Industrial
17
15
2
13
Governmental
37
32
5
16
Total retail
273
239
34
14
Sales for resale:
Associated companies
—
19
(19
)
(100
)
Non associated companies
18
1
17
1,700
Other
9
13
(4
)
(31
)
Total
$300
$272
$28
10
Billed Electric Energy Sales (GWh):
Residential
924
958
(34
)
(4
)
Commercial
1,056
1,048
8
1
Industrial
203
208
(5
)
(2
)
Governmental
372
368
4
1
Total retail
2,555
2,582
(27
)
(1
)
Sales for resale:
Associated companies
—
798
(798
)
(100
)
Non-associated companies
1,015
55
960
1,745
Total
3,570
3,435
135
4
147
Table of Contents
ENTERGY TEXAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Results of Operations
Net Income
Second Quarter 2017 Compared to Second Quarter 2016
Net income decreased $3 million primarily due to lower net revenue, higher depreciation and amortization expenses, and higher other operation and maintenance expenses, partially offset by a lower effective income tax rate.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
Net income decreased $6.7 million primarily due to higher depreciation and amortization expenses, higher other operation and maintenance expenses, and lower net revenue.
Net Revenue
Second Quarter 2017 Compared to Second Quarter 2016
Net revenue consists of operating revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale, 2) purchased power expenses, and 3) other regulatory charges. Following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing the
second quarter
2017
to the
second quarter
2016
:
Amount
(In Millions)
2016 net revenue
$157.0
Net wholesale revenue
(10.9
)
Retail electric price
6.8
Other
0.1
2017 net revenue
$153.0
The net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to lower net capacity revenues resulting from the termination of the purchased power agreements between Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Texas in August 2016.
The retail electric price variance is primarily due to the implementation of the transmission cost recovery factor rider in September 2016 and an increase in the transmission cost recovery factor rider rate in March 2017, as approved by the PUCT. See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the transmission cost recovery factor rider filings.
148
Table of Contents
Entergy Texas, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
Net revenue consists of operating revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale, 2) purchased power expenses, and 3) other regulatory charges. Following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing the
six months ended
June 30, 2017
to the
six months ended
June 30, 2016
:
Amount
(In Millions)
2016 net revenue
$295.2
Net wholesale revenue
(20.9
)
Volume/weather
9.1
Retail electric price
11.3
Other
(1.4
)
2017 net revenue
$293.3
The net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to lower net capacity revenues resulting from the termination of the purchased power agreements between Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Texas in August 2016.
The volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase in usage during the unbilled sales period, including the effect of weather.
The retail electric price variance is primarily due to the implementation of the transmission cost recovery factor rider in September 2016 and an increase in the transmission cost recovery factor rider rate in March 2017, as approved by the PUCT. See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the transmission cost recovery factor rider filings.
Other Income Statement Variances
Second Quarter 2017 Compared to Second Quarter 2016
Other operation and maintenance expenses increased primarily due to:
•
an increase of $2 million in transmission and distribution expenses due to higher vegetation maintenance costs;
•
an increase of $1.2 million in fossil-fueled generation expenses primarily due to a higher scope of work done during plant outages in 2017 compared to the same period in 2016; and
•
an increase of $0.7 million in energy efficiency costs.
The increase was partially offset by a $2 million decrease due to lower transmission equalization expenses, as allocated under the System Agreement, as compared to the same period in 2016 primarily as a result of Entergy Texas’s exit from the System Agreement in August 2016.
Depreciation and amortization expenses increased primarily due to additions to plant in service.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
Other operation and maintenance expenses increased primarily due to:
•
an increase of $1.8 million in transmission and distribution expenses due to higher vegetation maintenance costs;
•
an increase of $1.4 million in customer service costs;
149
Table of Contents
Entergy Texas, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
•
an increase of $1.3 million in fossil-fueled generation expenses primarily due to a higher scope of work done during plant outages in 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016;
•
an increase of $1.2 million in information technology expenses including software maintenance costs and upgrade projects;
•
an increase of $0.9 million in compensation and benefits costs primarily due to a downward revision to estimated incentive compensation expense in first quarter 2016; and
•
an increase of $0.7 million in energy efficiency costs.
The increase was partially offset by a decrease of $4.5 million due to lower transmission equalization expenses, as allocated under the System Agreement, in 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 primarily as a result of Entergy Texas’s exit from the System Agreement in August 2016.
Depreciation and amortization expenses increased primarily due to additions to plant in service.
Income Taxes
The effective income tax rate was 26.2% for the
second quarter
2017
. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the
second quarter
2017
versus the federal statutory rate of 35% was primarily due to the reversal of a portion of the provision for uncertain tax positions and book and tax differences related to the allowance for equity funds used during construction, partially offset by certain book and tax differences related to utility plant items.
The effective income tax rate was 33% for the
six months ended
June 30, 2017
. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the
six months ended
June 30, 2017
versus the federal statutory rate of 35% was primarily due to the reversal of a portion of the provision for uncertain tax positions and book and tax differences related to the allowance for equity funds used during construction, partially offset by certain book and tax differences related to utility plant items
a
nd a write-off of a stock-based compensation deferred tax asset.
The effective income tax rates were 39.9% for the
second quarter
2016
and 39.2% for the
six months ended
June 30, 2016
. The differences in the effective income tax rates for the
second quarter
2016
and for the
six months ended
June 30, 2016
versus the federal statutory rate of 35% were primarily due to state income taxes and certain book and tax differences related to utility plant items, partially offset by book and tax differences related to the allowance for equity funds used during construction.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Flow
Cash flows for the
six months ended
June 30, 2017
and
2016
were as follows:
2017
2016
(In Thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
$6,181
$2,182
Cash flow provided by (used in):
Operating activities
132,397
172,175
Investing activities
(140,929
)
(179,483
)
Financing activities
3,416
61,063
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
(5,116
)
53,755
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$1,065
$55,937
150
Table of Contents
Entergy Texas, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Operating Activities
Net cash flow provided by operating activities decreased $39.8 million for the
six months ended
June 30, 2017
compared to the
six months ended
June 30, 2016
primarily due to the timing of recovery of fuel and purchased power costs.
Investing Activities
Net cash flow used in investing activities decreased $38.6 million for the
six months ended
June 30, 2017
compared to the
six months ended
June 30, 2016
primarily due to:
•
a decrease of $49 million in transmission construction expenditures primarily due to a lower scope of work performed in 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016, partially offset by an increase in baseline work performed in 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016; and
•
money pool activity.
The decrease was partially offset by an increase of $16.2 million in fossil-fueled generation construction expenditures primarily due to a higher scope of work performed in 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016.
Decreases in Entergy Texas’s receivable from the money pool are a source of cash flow, and Entergy Texas’s receivable from the money pool decreased by $0.7 million for the
six months ended
June 30, 2017
compared to increasing by $7 million for the
six months ended
June 30, 2016
. The money pool is an inter-company borrowing arrangement designed to reduce the Utility subsidiaries’ need for external short-term borrowings.
Financing Activities
Net cash flow provided by financing activities decreased $57.6 million for the
six months ended
June 30, 2017
compared to the
six months ended
June 30, 2016
primarily due to the issuance of $125 million of 2.55% Series first mortgage bonds in March 2016, partially offset by money pool activity. See Note 4 to the financial statements herein and Note 5 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for more details on long-term debt.
Increases in Entergy Texas’s payable to the money pool are a source of cash flow, and Entergy Texas’s payable to the money pool increased by $39.2 million for the
six months ended
June 30, 2017
compared to decreasing by $22.1 million for the
six months ended
June 30, 2016
.
Capital Structure
Entergy Texas’s capitalization is balanced between equity and debt, as shown in the following table.
June 30,
2017
December 31, 2016
Debt to capital
57.2
%
58.5
%
Effect of excluding the securitization bonds
(7.7
%)
(8.3
%)
Debt to capital, excluding securitization bonds (a)
49.5
%
50.2
%
Effect of subtracting cash
—
%
(0.1
%)
Net debt to net capital, excluding securitization bonds (a)
49.5
%
50.1
%
(a)
Calculation excludes the securitization bonds, which are non-recourse to Entergy Texas.
Net debt consists of debt less cash and cash equivalents. Debt consists of long-term debt, including the currently maturing portion. Capital consists of debt and common equity. Net capital consists of capital less cash and cash equivalents. Entergy Texas uses the debt to capital ratios excluding securitization bonds in analyzing its financial
151
Table of Contents
Entergy Texas, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
condition and believes they provide useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating Entergy Texas’s financial condition because the securitization bonds are non-recourse to Entergy Texas, as more fully described in Note 5 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K. Entergy Texas also uses the net debt to net capital ratio excluding securitization bonds in analyzing its financial condition and believes it provides useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating Entergy Texas’s financial condition because net debt indicates Entergy Texas’s outstanding debt position that could not be readily satisfied by cash and cash equivalents on hand.
Uses and Sources of Capital
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
Liquidity and Capital Resources
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy Texas’s uses and sources of capital. Following are updates to information provided in the Form 10-K.
Entergy Texas’s receivables from or (payables to) the money pool were as follows:
June 30,
2017
December 31,
2016
June 30,
2016
December 31,
2015
(In Thousands)
($39,222)
$681
$7,011
($22,068)
See Note 4 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a description of the money pool.
Entergy Texas has a credit facility in the amount of $150 million scheduled to expire in August 2021. The credit facility allows Entergy Texas to issue letters of credit against 50% of the borrowing capacity of the facility. As of
June 30, 2017
, there were no cash borrowings and $13.3 million of letters of credit outstanding under the credit facility. In addition, Entergy Texas is a party to an uncommitted letter of credit facility as a means to post collateral to support its obligations to MISO. As of
June 30, 2017
, a $22.3 million letter of credit was outstanding under Entergy Texas’s uncommitted letter of credit facility. See Note 4 to the financial statements herein for additional discussion of the credit facilities.
Montgomery County Power Station
In October 2016, Entergy Texas filed an application with the PUCT seeking certification that the public convenience and necessity would be served by the construction of the Montgomery County Power Station, a nominal 993 MW combined-cycle generating unit in Montgomery County, Texas on land adjacent to the existing Lewis Creek plant. The current estimated cost of the Montgomery County Power Station is $937 million, including estimated costs of transmission interconnection and network upgrades and other related costs. The independent monitor, who oversaw the request for proposal process, filed testimony and a report affirming that the Montgomery County Power Station was selected through an objective and fair request for proposal process that showed no undue preference to any proposal. In June 2017, parties to the proceeding filed an unopposed stipulation and settlement agreement. The stipulation contemplates that Entergy Texas’s level of cost-recovery for generation construction costs for Montgomery County Power Station is capped at $831 million, subject to certain exclusions such as force majeure events. Also in June 2017, the administrative law judge issued a proposed order and remanded the proceeding to the PUCT for final decision. In July 2017 the PUCT approved the stipulation. Subject to the timely receipt of other permits and approvals, commercial operation is estimated to occur by mid-2021.
State and Local Rate Regulation and Fuel-Cost Recovery
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
State and Local Rate Regulation and Fuel-Cost Recovery
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of state and local rate regulation and fuel-cost recovery. The following are updates to that discussion.
152
Table of Contents
Entergy Texas, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Retail Rates
In September 2016, Entergy Texas filed with the PUCT a request to amend its transmission cost recovery factor (TCRF) rider. The proposed amended TCRF rider is designed to collect approximately $29.5 million annually from Entergy Texas’s retail customers. This amount includes the approximately $10.5 million annually that Entergy Texas is currently authorized to collect through the TCRF rider. In September 2016 the PUCT suspended the effective date of the tariff change to March 2017. In December 2016, Entergy Texas and the PUCT reached a settlement agreeing to the amended TCRF annual revenue requirement of $29.5 million. The PUCT approved the settlement and issued a final order in March 2017. Entergy Texas implemented the amended TCRF rider beginning with bills covering usage on and after March 20, 2017.
In June 2017, Entergy Texas filed an application to amend its distribution cost recovery factor (DCRF) rider by increasing the total collection from $8.65 million to approximately $19 million. In July 2017, Entergy Texas, the PUCT, and the two other parties in the proceeding entered into an unopposed stipulation and settlement agreement resulting in an amended DCRF annual revenue requirement of $18.3 million, with the resulting rates effective for usage no later than October 1, 2017. PUCT action on the stipulation and settlement agreement remains pending.
Fuel and purchased power cost recovery
As discussed in the Form 10-K, in July 2016, Entergy Texas filed an application to reconcile its fuel and purchased power costs for the period April 1, 2013 through March 31, 2016. In December 2016, Entergy Texas entered into a stipulation and settlement agreement resulting in a $6 million disallowance not associated with any particular issue raised and a refund of the over-recovery balance of $21 million as of November 30, 2016, to most customers beginning April 2017 through June 2017. The fuel reconciliation settlement was approved by the PUCT in March 2017 and the refunds were made.
In June 2017, Entergy Texas filed an application for a fuel refund of approximately $30.7 million for the months of December 2016 through April 2017. For most customers, the refunds will flow through bills for the months of July 2017 through September 2017. Also in June 2017, the PUCT’s administrative law judge approved the refund on an interim basis. A final decision in this matter remains pending.
Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) Filing
In its most recent regular session, the Texas legislature enacted legislation that extends statutory support for AMI deployment to Entergy Texas and directs that if Entergy Texas elects to deploy AMI, it shall do so as rapidly as practicable. In July 2017, Entergy Texas filed an application seeking an order from the PUCT approving Entergy Texas’s deployment of AMI. Entergy Texas proposed to replace existing meters with advanced meters that enable two-way data communication; design and build a secure and reliable network to support such communications; and implement support systems. AMI is intended to serve as the foundation of Entergy Texas’s modernized power grid. The filing identified a number of quantified and unquantified benefits, with Entergy Texas showing that its AMI deployment is expected to produce nominal net operational cost savings to customers of $33 million. Entergy Texas also sought to continue to include in rate base the remaining book value, approximately
$41 million
at December 31, 2016, of existing meters that will be retired as part of the AMI deployment and also to depreciate those assets using current depreciation rates. Entergy Texas proposed a seven-year depreciable life for the new advanced meters, the three-year deployment of which is expected to begin in 2019. Entergy Texas also proposed a surcharge tariff to recover the reasonable and necessary costs it has and will incur under the deployment plan for the full deployment of advanced meters. Further, Entergy Texas is seeking approval of fees that would be charged to customers who choose to opt out of receiving service through an advanced meter and instead receive electric service with a non-standard meter. Subject to approval by the PUCT, deployment of the communications network is expected to begin in 2018. Entergy Texas expects a decision from the PUCT by December 2017.
153
Table of Contents
Entergy Texas, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Federal Regulation
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –
Federal Regulation
”
in the Form 10-K for a discussion of federal regulation.
Industrial and Commercial Customers
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –
Industrial and Commercial Customers
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of industrial and commercial customers.
Nuclear Matters
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
Nuclear Matters
” in the Form 10-K for further discussion.
Environmental Risks
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
Environmental Risks
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of environmental risks.
Critical Accounting Estimates
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
Critical Accounting Estimates
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of utility regulatory accounting, unbilled revenue, impairment of long-lived assets and trust fund investments, taxation and uncertain tax positions, qualified pension and other postretirement benefits, and other contingencies.
New Accounting Pronouncements
See “
New Accounting Pronouncements
” section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis for further discussion.
154
Table of Contents
ENTERGY TEXAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended
Six Months Ended
2017
2016
2017
2016
(In Thousands)
(In Thousands)
OPERATING REVENUES
Electric
$378,488
$412,922
$742,415
$791,226
OPERATING EXPENSES
Operation and Maintenance:
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
46,142
71,478
104,155
163,882
Purchased power
160,325
167,071
310,709
297,483
Other operation and maintenance
56,577
54,135
110,483
107,170
Taxes other than income taxes
19,251
18,285
38,695
36,595
Depreciation and amortization
29,373
26,495
57,484
52,114
Other regulatory charges - net
19,033
17,419
34,260
34,674
TOTAL
330,701
354,883
655,786
691,918
OPERATING INCOME
47,787
58,039
86,629
99,308
OTHER INCOME
Allowance for equity funds used during construction
1,632
2,270
2,913
4,702
Interest and investment income
211
268
412
468
Miscellaneous - net
(631
)
(54
)
(813
)
(470
)
TOTAL
1,212
2,484
2,512
4,700
INTEREST EXPENSE
Interest expense
21,427
21,976
43,235
43,577
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction
(1,001
)
(1,473
)
(1,762
)
(3,054
)
TOTAL
20,426
20,503
41,473
40,523
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES
28,573
40,020
47,668
63,485
Income taxes
7,472
15,962
15,713
24,865
NET INCOME
$21,101
$24,058
$31,955
$38,620
See Notes to Financial Statements.
155
Table of Contents
(page left blank intentionally)
156
Table of Contents
ENTERGY TEXAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited)
2017
2016
(In Thousands)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income
$31,955
$38,620
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flow provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization
57,484
52,114
Deferred income taxes, investment tax credits, and non-current taxes accrued
(16,766
)
(40,175
)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Receivables
(15,969
)
(37,832
)
Fuel inventory
(4,813
)
14,129
Accounts payable
24,900
17,883
Prepaid taxes and taxes accrued
23,064
51,640
Interest accrued
(471
)
(2,719
)
Deferred fuel costs
6,144
54,066
Other working capital accounts
4,132
2,774
Provisions for estimated losses
83
(2,126
)
Other regulatory assets
45,306
43,378
Pension and other postretirement liabilities
(13,286
)
(12,850
)
Other assets and liabilities
(9,366
)
(6,727
)
Net cash flow provided by operating activities
132,397
172,175
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Construction expenditures
(155,755
)
(185,945
)
Allowance for equity funds used during construction
2,992
4,761
Insurance proceeds received for property damages
2,431
—
Changes in money pool receivable - net
681
(7,011
)
Changes in securitization account
8,722
8,712
Net cash flow used in investing activities
(140,929
)
(179,483
)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt
—
123,605
Retirement of long-term debt
(38,134
)
(36,659
)
Change in money pool payable - net
39,222
(22,068
)
Other
2,328
(3,815
)
Net cash flow provided by financing activities
3,416
61,063
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
(5,116
)
53,755
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
6,181
2,182
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$1,065
$55,937
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid (received) during the period for:
Interest - net of amount capitalized
$42,430
$45,056
Income taxes
($1,446
)
$3,443
See Notes to Financial Statements.
157
Table of Contents
ENTERGY TEXAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016
(Unaudited)
2017
2016
(In Thousands)
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents:
Cash
$1,036
$1,216
Temporary cash investments
29
4,965
Total cash and cash equivalents
1,065
6,181
Securitization recovery trust account
28,729
37,451
Accounts receivable:
Customer
70,008
71,803
Allowance for doubtful accounts
(791
)
(828
)
Associated companies
40,867
39,447
Other
13,121
14,756
Accrued unbilled revenues
56,988
39,727
Total accounts receivable
180,193
164,905
Fuel inventory - at average cost
41,990
37,177
Materials and supplies - at average cost
38,807
36,631
Prepayments and other
14,585
18,599
TOTAL
305,369
300,944
OTHER PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS
Investments in affiliates - at equity
573
600
Non-utility property - at cost (less accumulated depreciation)
376
376
Other
19,018
18,801
TOTAL
19,967
19,777
UTILITY PLANT
Electric
4,367,085
4,274,069
Construction work in progress
135,733
111,227
TOTAL UTILITY PLANT
4,502,818
4,385,296
Less - accumulated depreciation and amortization
1,542,664
1,526,057
UTILITY PLANT - NET
2,960,154
2,859,239
DEFERRED DEBITS AND OTHER ASSETS
Regulatory assets:
Regulatory asset for income taxes - net
105,086
105,816
Other regulatory assets (includes securitization property of $353,726 as of June 30, 2017 and $384,609 as of December 31, 2016)
695,580
740,156
Other
8,674
7,149
TOTAL
809,340
853,121
TOTAL ASSETS
$4,094,830
$4,033,081
See Notes to Financial Statements.
158
Table of Contents
ENTERGY TEXAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016
(Unaudited)
2017
2016
(In Thousands)
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payable:
Associated companies
$86,811
$47,867
Other
108,341
77,342
Customer deposits
44,329
44,419
Taxes accrued
38,415
15,351
Interest accrued
25,506
25,977
Deferred fuel costs
60,687
54,543
Other
11,753
9,388
TOTAL
375,842
274,887
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accumulated deferred income taxes and taxes accrued
1,008,466
1,027,647
Accumulated deferred investment tax credits
12,459
12,934
Other regulatory liabilities
5,574
8,502
Asset retirement cost liabilities
6,650
6,470
Accumulated provisions
7,667
7,584
Pension and other postretirement liabilities
54,043
67,313
Long-term debt (includes securitization bonds of $391,212 as of June 30, 2017 and $429,043 as of December 31, 2016)
1,471,091
1,508,407
Other
52,089
50,343
TOTAL
2,618,039
2,689,200
Commitments and Contingencies
COMMON EQUITY
Common stock, no par value, authorized 200,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 46,525,000 shares in 2017 and 2016
49,452
49,452
Paid-in capital
481,994
481,994
Retained earnings
569,503
537,548
TOTAL
1,100,949
1,068,994
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
$4,094,830
$4,033,081
See Notes to Financial Statements.
159
Table of Contents
ENTERGY TEXAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN COMMON EQUITY
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited)
Common Equity
Common
Stock
Paid-in
Capital
Retained
Earnings
Total
(In Thousands)
Balance at December 31, 2015
$49,452
$481,994
$430,010
$961,456
Net income
—
—
38,620
38,620
Balance at June 30, 2016
$49,452
$481,994
$468,630
$1,000,076
Balance at December 31, 2016
$49,452
$481,994
$537,548
$1,068,994
Net income
—
—
31,955
31,955
Balance at June 30, 2017
$49,452
$481,994
$569,503
$1,100,949
See Notes to Financial Statements.
160
Table of Contents
ENTERGY TEXAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SELECTED OPERATING RESULTS
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended
Increase/
Description
2017
2016
(Decrease)
%
(Dollars In Millions)
Electric Operating Revenues:
Residential
$143
$130
$13
10
Commercial
91
85
6
7
Industrial
95
94
1
1
Governmental
6
6
—
—
Total retail
335
315
20
6
Sales for resale:
Associated companies
16
64
(48
)
(75
)
Non-associated companies
9
12
(3
)
(25
)
Other
18
22
(4
)
(18
)
Total
$378
$413
($35
)
(8
)
Billed Electric Energy Sales (GWh):
Residential
1,274
1,209
65
5
Commercial
1,102
1,070
32
3
Industrial
1,973
1,938
35
2
Governmental
69
68
1
1
Total retail
4,418
4,285
133
3
Sales for resale:
Associated companies
425
1,683
(1,258
)
(75
)
Non-associated companies
271
345
(74
)
(21
)
Total
5,114
6,313
(1,199
)
(19
)
Six Months Ended
Increase/
Description
2017
2016
(Decrease)
%
(Dollars In Millions)
Electric Operating Revenues:
Residential
$280
$265
$15
6
Commercial
181
169
12
7
Industrial
195
188
7
4
Governmental
12
12
—
—
Total retail
668
634
34
5
Sales for resale:
Associated companies
29
117
(88
)
(75
)
Non-associated companies
14
18
(4
)
(22
)
Other
31
22
9
41
Total
$742
$791
($49
)
(6
)
Billed Electric Energy Sales (GWh):
Residential
2,487
2,484
3
—
Commercial
2,108
2,087
21
1
Industrial
3,763
3,745
18
—
Governmental
132
138
(6
)
(4
)
Total retail
8,490
8,454
36
—
Sales for resale:
Associated companies
763
3,105
(2,342
)
(75
)
Non-associated companies
348
494
(146
)
(30
)
Total
9,601
12,053
(2,452
)
(20
)
161
Table of Contents
SYSTEM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Results of Operations
System Energy’s principal asset currently consists of an ownership interest and a leasehold interest in Grand Gulf. The capacity and energy from its 90% interest is sold under the Unit Power Sales Agreement to its only four customers, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, and Entergy New Orleans. System Energy’s operating revenues are derived from the allocation of the capacity, energy, and related costs associated with its 90% interest in Grand Gulf pursuant to the Unit Power Sales Agreement. Payments under the Unit Power Sales Agreement are System Energy’s only source of operating revenues.
Second Quarter
2017
Compared to
Second Quarter
2016
Net income decreased $5.7 million primarily due to a higher effective income tax rate in 2017 and provisions against revenue being recorded in 2017 in connection with the complaint against System Energy’s return on equity. See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and “
Federal Regulation
-
Complaint Against System Energy
” below for further discussion of the complaint against System Energy.
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2017
Compared to
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2016
Net income decreased $11.4 million primarily due to a higher effective income tax rate in 2017 and provisions against revenue being recorded in 2017 in connection with the complaint against System Energy’s return on equity. See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and “
Federal Regulation
-
Complaint Against System Energy
” below for further discussion of the complaint against System Energy.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Flow
Cash flows for the
six months ended
June 30, 2017
and
2016
were as follows:
2017
2016
(In Thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
$245,863
$230,661
Cash flow provided by (used in):
Operating activities
171,460
137,292
Investing activities
(65,983
)
(167,749
)
Financing activities
(13,740
)
(61,410
)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
91,737
(91,867
)
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$337,600
$138,794
Operating Activities
Net cash flow provided by operating activities increased $34.2 million for the
six months ended
June 30, 2017
compared to the
six months ended
June 30, 2016
primarily due to a decrease in spending of $33.8 million on nuclear refueling outages in 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016.
162
Table of Contents
System Energy Resources, Inc.
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Investing Activities
Net cash flow used in investing activities decreased $101.8 million for the
six months ended
June 30, 2017
compared to the
six months ended
June 30, 2016
primarily due to:
•
fluctuations in nuclear fuel activity because of variations from year to year in the timing and pricing of fuel reload requirements in the Utility business, material and services deliveries, and the timing of cash payments during the nuclear fuel cycle; and
•
a decrease of $28.1 million in nuclear construction expenditures primarily as a result of a higher scope of work performed in 2016 on Grand Gulf outage projects and lower spending in 2017 on compliance with NRC post-Fukushima requirements.
The decrease was partially offset by money pool activity.
Increases in System Energy’s receivable from the money pool are a use of cash flow and System Energy’s receivable from the money pool increased by $54.9 million for the
six months ended
June 30, 2017
compared to decreasing by $22.2 million for the
six months ended
June 30, 2016
. The money pool is an inter-company borrowing arrangement designed to reduce the Utility subsidiaries’ need for external short-term borrowings.
Financing Activities
Net cash flow used in financing activities decreased $47.7 million for the
six months ended
June 30, 2017
compared to the
six months ended
June 30, 2016
primarily due to:
•
common stock dividends and distributions of $139 million in 2016 in order to maintain the targeted capital structure; and
•
the partial repayment caused by System Energy in May 2016 of $22 million of 5.875% pollution control revenue bonds due 2022 issued on behalf of System Energy.
The decrease was partially offset by:
•
a decrease in net borrowings of $63.3 million on the nuclear fuel company variable interest entity’s credit facility in 2017 compared to the same period in 2016; and
•
the payment in February 2017, at maturity, of $50 million of the System Energy nuclear fuel company variable interest entity’s 4.02% Series H notes.
See Note 4 to the financial statements herein and Note 5 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for more details on long-term debt.
Capital Structure
System Energy’s capitalization is balanced between equity and debt, as shown in the following table. The decrease in the debt to capital ratio is primarily due to an increase in retained earnings.
June 30,
2017
December 31, 2016
Debt to capital
43.7
%
45.5
%
Effect of subtracting cash
(18.2
%)
(12.0
%)
Net debt to net capital
25.5
%
33.5
%
Net debt consists of debt less cash and cash equivalents. Debt consists of short-term borrowings and long-term debt, including the currently maturing portion. Capital consists of debt and common equity. Net capital consists of capital
163
Table of Contents
System Energy Resources, Inc.
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
less cash and cash equivalents. System Energy uses the debt to capital ratio in analyzing its financial condition and believes it provides useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating System Energy’s financial condition. System Energy uses the net debt to net capital ratio in analyzing its financial condition and believes it provides useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating System Energy’s financial condition because net debt indicates System Energy’s outstanding debt position that could not be readily satisfied by cash and cash equivalents on hand.
Uses and Sources of Capital
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
Liquidity and Capital Resources
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of System Energy’s uses and sources of capital. Following are updates to the information provided in the Form 10-K.
System Energy’s receivables from the money pool were as follows:
June 30,
2017
December 31,
2016
June 30,
2016
December 31,
2015
(In Thousands)
$88,669
$33,809
$17,718
$39,926
See Note 4 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a description of the money pool.
The System Energy nuclear fuel company variable interest entity has a credit facility in the amount of
$120 million
scheduled to expire in
May 2019
. As of
June 30, 2017
, $53.2 million in letters of credit to support a like amount of commercial paper issued and $50 million in loans were outstanding under the System Energy nuclear fuel company variable interest entity credit facility. See Note 4 to the financial statements herein for additional discussion of the variable interest entity credit facility.
Federal Regulation
See the “
Rate, Cost-recovery, and Other Regulation
-
Federal Regulation
” section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis in the Form 10-K and Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for a discussion of federal regulation.
Complaint Against System Energy
In January 2017 the APSC and MPSC filed a complaint with the FERC against System Energy. The complaint seeks a reduction in the return on equity component of the Unit Power Sales Agreement pursuant to which System Energy sells its Grand Gulf capacity and energy to Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, and Entergy New Orleans. Entergy Arkansas also sells some of its Grand Gulf capacity and energy to Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, and Entergy New Orleans under separate agreements. The current return on equity under the Unit Power Sales Agreement is 10.94%. The complaint alleges that the return on equity is unjust and unreasonable because current capital market and other considerations indicate that it is excessive. The complaint requests the FERC to institute proceedings to investigate the return on equity and establish a lower return on equity, and also requests that the FERC establish January 23, 2017, as a refund effective date. The complaint includes return on equity analysis that purports to establish that the range of reasonable return on equity for System Energy is between 8.37% and 8.67%. System Energy answered the complaint in February 2017 and disputes that a return on equity of 8.37% to 8.67% is just and reasonable. The LPSC and the City Council intervened in the proceeding expressing support for the complaint. System Energy is recording a provision against revenue for the potential outcome of this proceeding. Action by the FERC is pending.
164
Table of Contents
System Energy Resources, Inc.
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis
Unit Power Sales Agreement
In August 2017, System Energy submitted to the FERC proposed amendments to the Unit Power Sales Agreement pursuant to which System Energy sells its Grand Gulf capacity and energy to Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, and Entergy New Orleans. The filing proposes limited amendments to the Unit Power Sales Agreement to adopt (1) updated rates for use in calculating Grand Gulf plant depreciation and amortization expenses and (2) updated nuclear decommissioning cost annual revenue requirements, both of which are recovered through the Unit Power Sales Agreement rate formula. The proposed amendments would result in lower charges to the Utility operating companies that buy capacity and energy from System Energy under the Unit Power Sales Agreement. The proposed changes are based on updated depreciation and nuclear decommissioning studies that take into account the renewal of Grand Gulf’s operating license for a term through November 1, 2044. System Energy requested that the FERC accept the amendments effective October 1, 2017. Action by the FERC is pending.
Nuclear Matters
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –
Nuclear Matters
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of nuclear matters.
Environmental Risks
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –
Environmental Risks
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of environmental risks.
Critical Accounting Estimates
See “
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
Critical Accounting Estimates
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the estimates and judgments necessary in System Energy’s accounting for nuclear decommissioning costs, utility regulatory accounting, impairment of long-lived assets and trust fund investments, taxation and uncertain tax positions, qualified pension and other postretirement benefits, and other contingencies.
New Accounting Pronouncements
See “
New Accounting Pronouncements
” section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis for further discussion.
165
Table of Contents
SYSTEM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.
INCOME STATEMENTS
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended
Six Months Ended
2017
2016
2017
2016
(In Thousands)
(In Thousands)
OPERATING REVENUES
Electric
$164,956
$151,323
$319,743
$289,016
OPERATING EXPENSES
Operation and Maintenance:
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
21,660
20,394
36,994
33,822
Nuclear refueling outage expenses
4,387
4,905
9,160
9,489
Other operation and maintenance
54,310
35,766
102,711
67,926
Decommissioning
13,452
12,593
26,684
24,980
Taxes other than income taxes
6,664
6,385
13,088
12,637
Depreciation and amortization
35,187
35,384
70,628
70,091
Other regulatory credits - net
(11,421
)
(9,124
)
(21,783
)
(22,415
)
TOTAL
124,239
106,303
237,482
196,530
OPERATING INCOME
40,717
45,020
82,261
92,486
OTHER INCOME
Allowance for equity funds used during construction
1,318
1,602
2,412
4,331
Interest and investment income
3,723
5,124
8,397
8,398
Miscellaneous - net
(103
)
(164
)
(231
)
(256
)
TOTAL
4,938
6,562
10,578
12,473
INTEREST EXPENSE
Interest expense
9,181
9,382
18,300
18,934
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction
(322
)
(401
)
(589
)
(1,097
)
TOTAL
8,859
8,981
17,711
17,837
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES
36,796
42,601
75,128
87,122
Income taxes
17,446
17,511
35,431
36,074
NET INCOME
$19,350
$25,090
$39,697
$51,048
See Notes to Financial Statements.
166
Table of Contents
SYSTEM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited)
2017
2016
(In Thousands)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income
$39,697
$51,048
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flow provided by operating activities:
Depreciation, amortization, and decommissioning, including nuclear fuel amortization
128,679
123,424
Deferred income taxes, investment tax credits, and non-current taxes accrued
35,498
83,733
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Receivables
10,077
3,731
Accounts payable
3,469
(3,200
)
Prepaid taxes and taxes accrued
(10,086
)
(60,954
)
Interest accrued
(609
)
(145
)
Other working capital accounts
2,960
(28,319
)
Other regulatory assets
(4,904
)
(9,844
)
Pension and other postretirement liabilities
(8,116
)
(9,071
)
Other assets and liabilities
(25,205
)
(13,111
)
Net cash flow provided by operating activities
171,460
137,292
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Construction expenditures
(32,799
)
(57,429
)
Allowance for equity funds used during construction
2,412
4,331
Nuclear fuel purchases
(22,510
)
(130,275
)
Proceeds from the sale of nuclear fuel
60,188
11,467
Proceeds from nuclear decommissioning trust fund sales
253,487
289,414
Investment in nuclear decommissioning trust funds
(271,901
)
(307,465
)
Changes in money pool receivable - net
(54,860
)
22,208
Net cash flow used in investing activities
(65,983
)
(167,749
)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Retirement of long-term debt
(50,001
)
(22,001
)
Changes in credit borrowings - net
36,289
99,617
Common stock dividends and distributions
—
(139,000
)
Other
(28
)
(26
)
Net cash flow used in financing activities
(13,740
)
(61,410
)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
91,737
(91,867
)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
245,863
230,661
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$337,600
$138,794
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest - net of amount capitalized
$17,656
$18,494
Income taxes
$—
$3,402
See Notes to Financial Statements.
167
Table of Contents
SYSTEM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.
BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016
(Unaudited)
2017
2016
(In Thousands)
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents:
Cash
$555
$786
Temporary cash investments
337,045
245,077
Total cash and cash equivalents
337,600
245,863
Accounts receivable:
Associated companies
147,497
104,390
Other
5,313
3,637
Total accounts receivable
152,810
108,027
Materials and supplies - at average cost
84,418
82,469
Deferred nuclear refueling outage costs
15,867
24,729
Prepaid taxes
25,968
15,882
Prepayments and other
8,183
4,229
TOTAL
624,846
481,199
OTHER PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS
Decommissioning trust funds
839,385
780,496
TOTAL
839,385
780,496
UTILITY PLANT
Electric
4,304,301
4,331,668
Property under capital lease
585,084
585,084
Construction work in progress
61,617
43,888
Nuclear fuel
199,686
259,635
TOTAL UTILITY PLANT
5,150,688
5,220,275
Less - accumulated depreciation and amortization
3,125,020
3,063,249
UTILITY PLANT - NET
2,025,668
2,157,026
DEFERRED DEBITS AND OTHER ASSETS
Regulatory assets:
Regulatory asset for income taxes - net
88,924
93,127
Other regulatory assets
420,319
411,212
Other
4,492
4,652
TOTAL
513,735
508,991
TOTAL ASSETS
$4,003,634
$3,927,712
See Notes to Financial Statements.
168
Table of Contents
SYSTEM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.
BALANCE SHEETS
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016
(Unaudited)
2017
2016
(In Thousands)
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Currently maturing long-term debt
$3
$50,003
Short-term borrowings
53,182
66,893
Accounts payable:
Associated companies
6,719
5,843
Other
48,251
50,558
Interest accrued
13,440
14,049
Other
2,958
2,957
TOTAL
124,553
190,303
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accumulated deferred income taxes and taxes accrued
1,142,955
1,112,865
Accumulated deferred investment tax credits
39,686
41,663
Other regulatory liabilities
406,570
370,862
Decommissioning
845,001
854,202
Pension and other postretirement liabilities
109,734
117,850
Long-term debt
551,293
501,129
Other
5,322
15
TOTAL
3,100,561
2,998,586
Commitments and Contingencies
COMMON EQUITY
Common stock, no par value, authorized 1,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 789,350 shares in 2017 and 2016
679,350
679,350
Retained earnings
99,170
59,473
TOTAL
778,520
738,823
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
$4,003,634
$3,927,712
See Notes to Financial Statements.
169
Table of Contents
SYSTEM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN COMMON EQUITY
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016
(Unaudited)
Common Equity
Common
Stock
Retained
Earnings
Total
(In Thousands)
Balance at December 31, 2015
$719,350
$61,729
$781,079
Net income
—
51,048
51,048
Common stock dividends and distributions
(40,000
)
(99,000
)
(139,000
)
Balance at June 30, 2016
$679,350
$13,777
$693,127
Balance at December 31, 2016
$679,350
$59,473
$738,823
Net income
—
39,697
39,697
Balance at June 30, 2017
$679,350
$99,170
$778,520
See Notes to Financial Statements.
170
Table of Contents
ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
See “
PART I, Item 1,
Litigation
” in the Form 10-K for a discussion of legal, administrative, and other regulatory proceedings affecting Entergy. Also see Note 1 and Note 2 to the financial statements herein and “
Item 5, Other Information,
Environmental Regulation
” below for updates regarding environmental proceedings and regulation.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes to the risk factors discussed in “
PART I, Item 1A,
Risk Factors”
in the Form 10-K.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities (a)
Period
Total Number of
Shares Purchased
Average Price Paid
per Share
Total Number of
Shares Purchased
as Part of a
Publicly
Announced Plan
Maximum $
Amount
of Shares that May
Yet be Purchased
Under a Plan (b)
4/01/2017-4/30/2017
—
$—
—
$350,052,918
5/01/2017-5/31/2017
—
$—
—
$350,052,918
6/01/2017-6/30/2017
—
$—
—
$350,052,918
Total
—
$—
—
In accordance with Entergy’s stock-based compensation plans, Entergy periodically grants stock options to key employees, which may be exercised to obtain shares of Entergy’s common stock. According to the plans, these shares can be newly issued shares, treasury stock, or shares purchased on the open market. Entergy’s management has been authorized by the Board to repurchase on the open market shares up to an amount sufficient to fund the exercise of grants under the plans. In addition to this authority, the Board has authorized share repurchase programs to enable opportunistic purchases in response to market conditions. In October 2010 the Board granted authority for a $500 million share repurchase program. The amount of share repurchases under these programs may vary as a result of material changes in business results or capital spending or new investment opportunities. In addition, in the first quarter 2017, Entergy withheld 1,054 shares of its common stock at $70.58 per share, 122,148 shares of its common stock at $70.61 per share, and 31,243 shares of its common stock at $71.89 per share to pay income taxes due upon vesting of restricted stock granted and payout of performance units as part of its long-term incentive program.
(a)
See Note 12 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for additional discussion of the stock-based compensation plans.
(b)
Maximum amount of shares that may yet be repurchased relates only to the $500 million plan and does not include an estimate of the amount of shares that may be purchased to fund the exercise of grants under the stock-based compensation plans.
171
Table of Contents
Item 5. Other Information
Regulation of the Nuclear Power Industry
Following are updates to the
Regulation of the Nuclear Power Industry
section of Part I, Item 1 of the Form 10-K.
Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982
Nuclear Plant Decommissioning
See the discussion in Part I, Item 1 in the Form 10-K for information regarding decommissioning funding for the nuclear plants. Following are updates to that discussion.
In March 2017 filings with the NRC were made for certain Entergy subsidiaries’ nuclear plants reporting on decommissioning funding. Those reports showed that decommissioning funding for each of those nuclear plants met the NRC’s financial assurance requirements.
In March 2017, Entergy sold the FitzPatrick plant to Exelon, and as part of the transaction, the FitzPatrick decommissioning trust fund, along with the decommissioning obligation for that plant, was transferred to Exelon. The FitzPatrick spent fuel disposal contract was assigned to Exelon as part of the transaction.
Environmental Regulation
Following are updates to the
Environmental Regulation
section of Part I, Item 1 of the Form 10-K.
Clean Air Act and Subsequent Amendments
Regional Haze
In June 2005 the EPA issued its final Clean Air Visibility Rule (CAVR) regulations that potentially could result in a requirement to install SO
2
and NO
x
pollution control technology as Best Available Retrofit Control Technology (BART) to continue operating certain of Entergy’s fossil generation units. The rule leaves certain CAVR determinations to the states.
In Arkansas, the Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) prepared a State Implementation Plan (SIP) for Arkansas facilities to implement its obligations under the CAVR. In April 2012 the EPA finalized a decision addressing the Arkansas Regional Haze SIP, in which it disapproved a large portion of the Arkansas Regional Haze SIP, including the emission limits for NO
x
and SO
2
at White Bluff. By Court order, the EPA had to issue a final federal implementation plan (FIP) for Arkansas Regional Haze by no later than August 31, 2016. In April 2015 the EPA published a proposed FIP for Arkansas, taking comment on requiring installation of scrubbers and low NO
x
burners to continue operating both units at the White Bluff plant and both units at the Independence plant and NO
x
controls to continue operating the Lake Catherine plant. Entergy filed comments by the deadline in August 2015. Among other comments, including opposition to the EPA’s proposed controls on the Independence units, Entergy proposed to meet more stringent SO
2
and NO
x
limits at both White Bluff and Independence within three years of the effective date of the final FIP and to cease the use of coal at the White Bluff units at a later date.
In September 2016 the EPA published the final Arkansas Regional Haze FIP. In most respects, the EPA finalized its original proposal but shortened the time for compliance for installation of the NO
x
controls. The FIP requires an emission limitation consistent with SO
2
scrubbers at both White Bluff and Independence by October 2021 and NO
x
controls by April 2018. The EPA declined to adopt Entergy’s proposals related to ceasing coal use as an alternative to SO
2
scrubbers for White Bluff SO
2
BART. For some or all of the FIP, Entergy anticipates that Arkansas will submit a SIP to replace the FIP. In November 2016, Entergy and other interested parties such as the State of Arkansas filed
172
Table of Contents
petitions for administrative reconsideration and stay at the EPA as well as petitions for judicial review to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. In February 2017, Entergy, the State of Arkansas, and other parties requested the Court to judicially stay the FIP. In March 2017 the EPA granted in part the petitions for reconsideration and stated its intent to stay the FIP compliance deadlines by at least 90 days. Subsequently, the EPA granted a 90 day stay of the FIP effective dates and the Eighth Circuit granted the government’s motion to hold the appeal litigation in abeyance pending settlement discussions.
In Louisiana, Entergy is working with the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (LDEQ) and the EPA to revise the Louisiana SIP for regional haze, which was disapproved in part in 2012. The LDEQ submitted a revised SIP in February 2017. In May 2017 the EPA proposed to approve a majority of the revisions, with a second SIP and EPA review to follow on the Nelson plant, with a final EPA decision expected in the fourth quarter 2017. At this time, it is premature to predict what controls, if any, might be required for compliance. Entergy continues to monitor the submission and to file comments in the process as appropriate.
New and Existing Source Performance Standards for Greenhouse Gas Emissions
As a part of a climate plan announced in June 2013, the EPA was directed to (i) reissue proposed carbon pollution standards for new power plants by September 20, 2013, with finalization of the rules to occur in a timely manner; (ii) issue proposed carbon pollution standards, regulations, or guidelines, as appropriate, for modified, reconstructed, and existing power plants no later than June 1, 2014; (iii) finalize those rules by no later than June 1, 2015; and (iv) include in the guidelines addressing existing power plants a requirement that states submit to the EPA the implementation plans required under Section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act and its implementing regulations by no later than June 30, 2016. In January 2014 the EPA issued the proposed New Source Performance Standards rule for new sources. In June 2014 the EPA issued proposed standards for existing power plants. Entergy has been actively engaged in the rulemaking process, having submitted comments to the EPA in December 2014. The EPA issued the final rules for both new and existing sources in August 2015, and they were published in the Federal Register in October 2015. The existing source rule, also called the Clean Power Plan, requires states to develop compliance plans with the EPA’s emission standards. In February 2016 the U.S. Supreme Court issued a stay halting the effectiveness of the rule until the rule is reviewed by the D.C. Circuit and the U.S. Supreme Court, if review is granted. In March 2017 the current administration issued an executive order entitled “Promoting Energy Independence and Economic Growth” instructing the EPA to review, suspend, revise, or rescind the Clean Power Plan if appropriate. The EPA subsequently asked the D.C. Circuit to hold the challenges to the Clean Power Plan and the greenhouse gas new source performance standards in abeyance and signed a notice of withdrawal of the proposed federal plan, model trading rules, and the Clean Energy Incentive Program. The court placed the litigation in abeyance in April 2017. The EPA Administrator also sent a letter to the affected governors explaining that states are not currently required to meet Clean Power Plan deadlines, some of which have passed. In June 2017 the EPA submitted a rule, “Review of the Clean Power Plan” to the Office of Management and Budget to review, which typically takes 60-90 days. The content of this rule has not been made public.
Clean Water Act
The 1972 amendments to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (known as the Clean Water Act) provide the statutory basis for the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit program and the basic structure for regulating the discharge of pollutants from point sources to waters of the United States. The Clean Water Act requires virtually all discharges of pollutants to waters of the United States to be permitted. Section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act regulates cooling water intake structures, section 401 of the Clean Water Act requires a water quality certification from the state in support of certain federal actions and approvals, and section 404 regulates the dredge and fill of waters of the United States, including jurisdictional wetlands.
NPDES Permits and Section 401 Water Quality Certifications
NPDES permits are subject to renewal every five years. Consequently, Entergy is currently in various stages of the data evaluation and discharge permitting process for its power plants.
173
Table of Contents
For thirteen years, Entergy participated in an administrative permitting process with the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) for renewal of the Indian Point 2 and Indian Point 3 discharge permit. That proceeding recently was settled along with other ongoing proceedings. In May 2017 a plaintiff filed two parallel state court appeals challenging New York State’s actions in signing and implementing the Indian Point settlement with Entergy on the basis that the State failed to perform sufficient environmental analysis of its actions. All signatories to the settlement agreement, including the Entergy affiliates that hold NRC licenses for Indian Point, were named. For a discussion of the recent Indian Point settlement, see “
Entergy Wholesale Commodities Authorization to Operate Its Nuclear Power Plants
” in Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis.
316(b) Cooling Water Intake Structures
The EPA finalized regulations in July 2004 governing the intake of water at large existing power plants employing cooling water intake structures. The rule sought to reduce perceived impacts on aquatic resources by requiring covered facilities to implement technology or other measures to meet EPA-targeted reductions in water use and corresponding perceived aquatic impacts. Entergy, other industry members and industry groups, environmental groups, and a coalition of northeastern and mid-Atlantic states challenged various aspects of the rule. After litigation, in May 2014, the EPA issued a new final 316(b) rule, followed by publication in the Federal Register in August 2014, with the final rule effective in October 2014. Entergy is developing a compliance plan for each affected facility in accordance with the requirements of the final rule.
Entergy filed a petition for review of the final rule as a co-petitioner with the Utility Water Act Group. The case will be heard in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Briefing is complete and Entergy expects oral argument to be scheduled in mid- to late-2017.
Federal Jurisdiction of Waters of the United States
In September 2013 the EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers announced the intention to propose a rule to clarify federal Clean Water Act jurisdiction over waters of the United States. The announcement was made in conjunction with the EPA’s release of a draft scientific report on the “connectivity” of waters that the agency said would inform the rulemaking. This report was finalized in January 2015. The final rule was published in the Federal Register in June 2015. The rule could significantly increase the number and types of waters included in the EPA’s and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ jurisdiction, which in turn could pose additional permitting and pollutant management burdens on Entergy’s operations. The final rule has been challenged in federal court by several parties, including most states. In August 2015 the District Court for North Dakota issued a preliminary injunction staying the new rule in 13 states. In October 2015 the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit issued a nationwide stay of the rule. Entergy will continue to monitor this rulemaking and ensure compliance with existing permitting processes. In response to the stay, the EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers resumed nationwide use of the agencies’ regulations as they existed prior to August 27, 2015. In February 2017 the current administration issued an executive order instructing the EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to review the Waters of the United States rule and to revise or rescind, as appropriate. In June 2017 the EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers released a proposed rule that rescinds the June 2015 rule and recodifies the definition of “waters of the U.S.” that was in effect prior to the 2015 rule. The administration is expected to propose a definition of “waters of the U.S.” at a later date.
Other Environmental Matters
Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Texas
Several class action and other lawsuits have been filed in state and federal courts seeking relief from Entergy Gulf States, Inc. and others for damages caused by the disposal of hazardous waste and for asbestos-related disease allegedly resulting from exposure on Entergy Gulf States, Inc.’s premises (see “Litigation” below).
Entergy Louisiana, as successor in interest to Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, currently is involved in the second phase of the remedial investigation of the Lake Charles Service Center site, located in Lake Charles, Louisiana. A
174
Table of Contents
manufactured gas plant (MGP) is believed to have operated at this site from approximately 1916 to 1931. Coal tar, a by-product of the distillation process employed at MGPs, apparently was routed to a portion of the property for disposal. The same area also has been used as a landfill. In 1999, Entergy Gulf States, Inc. signed a second administrative consent order with the EPA to perform a removal action at the site. In 2002 approximately 7,400 tons of contaminated soil and debris were excavated and disposed of from an area within the service center. In 2003 a cap was constructed over the remedial area to prevent the migration of contamination to the surface. In August 2005 an administrative order was issued by the EPA requiring that a 10-year groundwater study be conducted at this site. The groundwater monitoring study commenced in January 2006 and is continuing. The EPA released the second Five Year Review in 2015. The EPA indicated that the current remediation technique was insufficient and that Entergy would need to utilize other remediation technologies on the site. In July 2015, Entergy submitted a Focused Feasibility Study to the EPA outlining the potential remedies and suggesting installation of a waterloo barrier. The estimated cost for this remedy is approximately $2 million. Entergy is awaiting comments and direction from the EPA on the Focused Feasibility Study and potential remedy selection. In early 2017 the EPA indicated that the new remedial method (waterloo barrier) may not be necessary. Entergy is continuing discussions with the EPA regarding the ongoing actions at the site.
Earnings Ratios
(Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy)
The Registrant Subsidiaries have calculated ratios of earnings to fixed charges and ratios of earnings to combined fixed charges and preferred dividends/distributions pursuant to Item 503 of Regulation S-K of the SEC as follows:
Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges
Twelve Months Ended
Six Months Ended
December 31,
June 30,
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
Entergy Arkansas
3.79
3.62
3.08
2.04
3.32
2.54
Entergy Louisiana
2.61
3.30
3.44
3.36
3.57
3.30
Entergy Mississippi
2.79
3.19
3.23
3.59
3.96
3.86
Entergy New Orleans
2.91
1.85
3.55
4.90
4.61
4.62
Entergy Texas
1.76
1.94
2.39
2.22
2.92
2.08
System Energy
5.12
5.66
4.04
4.53
5.39
5.01
Ratios of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges
and Preferred Dividends/Distributions
Twelve Months Ended
Six Months Ended
December 31,
June 30,
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
Entergy Arkansas
3.36
3.25
2.76
1.85
3.09
2.49
Entergy Louisiana
2.47
3.14
3.28
3.24
3.57
3.30
Entergy Mississippi
2.59
2.97
3.00
3.34
3.71
3.75
Entergy New Orleans
2.63
1.70
3.26
4.50
4.30
4.32
The Registrant Subsidiaries accrue interest expense related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense and do not include it in fixed charges.
175
Table of Contents
Item 6. Exhibits
4(a) -
Eighty-eighth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 1, 2017, to Entergy Louisiana Mortgage and Deed of Trust, dated as of April 1, 1944 (4.43 to Form 8-K filed May 23, 2017 in 1-32718).
4(b) -
Eighty-eighth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 1, 2017, to Entergy Louisiana Mortgage and Deed of Trust, dated as of September 1, 1926 (4.42 to Form 8-K filed May 23, 2017 in 1-32718).
4(c) -
Eighth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 1, 2017, to Entergy Louisiana Mortgage and Deed of Trust, dated as of November 1, 2015 (4.41 to Form 8-K filed May 23, 2017 in 1-32718).
4(d) -
Officer’s Certificate No. 8-B-7, dated May 17, 2017, supplemental to Mortgage and Deed of Trust of Entergy Louisiana, dated as of November 1, 2015 (4.40 to Form 8-K filed May 23, 2017 in 1-32718).
*10(a) -
First Amendment to The 2015 Entergy Corporation Non-Employee Director Stock Program Established under the 2015 Equity Ownership Plan of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries.
*12(a) -
Entergy Arkansas’s Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Dividends, as defined.
*12(b) -
Entergy Louisiana’s Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Distributions, as defined.
*12(c) -
Entergy Mississippi’s Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Dividends, as defined.
*12(d) -
Entergy New Orleans’s Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Dividends, as defined.
*12(e) -
Entergy Texas’s Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges, as defined.
*12(f) -
System Energy’s Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges, as defined.
*31(a) -
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy Corporation.
*31(b) -
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy Corporation.
*31(c) -
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy Arkansas.
*31(d) -
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy Arkansas.
*31(e) -
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy Louisiana.
*31(f) -
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy Louisiana.
*31(g) -
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy Mississippi.
*31(h) -
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy Mississippi.
*31(i) -
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy New Orleans.
*31(j) -
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy New Orleans.
*31(k) -
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy Texas.
*31(l) -
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy Texas.
*31(m) -
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for System Energy.
*31(n) -
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for System Energy.
*32(a) -
Section 1350 Certification for Entergy Corporation.
*32(b) -
Section 1350 Certification for Entergy Corporation.
*32(c) -
Section 1350 Certification for Entergy Arkansas.
176
Table of Contents
*32(d) -
Section 1350 Certification for Entergy Arkansas.
*32(e) -
Section 1350 Certification for Entergy Louisiana.
*32(f) -
Section 1350 Certification for Entergy Louisiana.
*32(g) -
Section 1350 Certification for Entergy Mississippi.
*32(h) -
Section 1350 Certification for Entergy Mississippi.
*32(i) -
Section 1350 Certification for Entergy New Orleans.
*32(j) -
Section 1350 Certification for Entergy New Orleans.
*32(k) -
Section 1350 Certification for Entergy Texas.
*32(l) -
Section 1350 Certification for Entergy Texas.
*32(m) -
Section 1350 Certification for System Energy.
*32(n) -
Section 1350 Certification for System Energy.
*101 INS -
XBRL Instance Document.
*101 SCH -
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
*101 PRE -
XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document.
*101 LAB -
XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document.
*101 CAL -
XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document.
*101 DEF -
XBRL Definition Linkbase Document.
___________________________
Pursuant to Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of Regulation S-K, Entergy Corporation agrees to furnish to the Commission upon request any instrument with respect to long-term debt that is not registered or listed herein as an Exhibit because the total amount of securities authorized under such agreement does not exceed ten percent of the total assets of Entergy Corporation and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.
*
Filed herewith.
177
Table of Contents
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, each registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized. The signature for each undersigned company shall be deemed to relate only to matters having reference to such company or its subsidiaries.
ENTERGY CORPORATION
ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC.
ENTERGY LOUISIANA, LLC
ENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, INC.
ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, INC.
ENTERGY TEXAS, INC.
SYSTEM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.
/s/ Alyson M. Mount
Alyson M. Mount
Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
(For each Registrant and for each as
Principal Accounting Officer)
Date:
August 3, 2017
178