IDEX - 10-Q quarterly report FY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes þ     No o 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes o     No o 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes o     No þ 

 

Number of shares of common stock of IDEX Corporation outstanding as of October 30, 2009: 80,827,210 (net of treasury shares).

 

 

 

 

 

 

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

 

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

 

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

 

 

The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of IDEX Corporation (“IDEX” or the “Company”) have been prepared in accordance with the instructions toForm 10-Qunder the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The statements are unaudited but include all adjustments, consisting only of recurring items, except as noted, which the Company considers necessary for a fair presentation of the information set forth herein. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire year.

 

The condensed consolidated financial statements and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Annual Report onForm 10-Kfor the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.

 

 

On July 1, 2009 the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification^tm(“ASC”) became the authoritative source of accounting principals to be applied to financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”). In accordance with the ASC, citations to accounting literature in this report are to the relevant topic of the ASC or are presented in plain English. This standard is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The Company adopted this standard at its effective date.

 

In May 2009, the FASB issued an update to ASC 855 “Subsequent Events.” This standard establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date, but before the financial statements are issued or available to be issued (“subsequent events”). This standard requires disclosure of the date through which the entity has evaluated subsequent events and the basis for that date. For public entities, this is the date the financial statements are issued. This standard does not apply to subsequent events or transactions that are within the scope of other GAAP and will not result in significant changes in the subsequent events reported by the Company. This standard is effective for interim or annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Company has adopted this standard at its effective date.

 

In April 2009, the FASB issued an update to ASC 820 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” and ASC 270 “Interim Reporting.” This standard requires disclosures about fair value of financial instruments in interim and annual financial statements. This standard is effective for periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Company has adopted this standard at its effective date.

 

In June 2008, the FASB issued an update to ASC 260, “Earnings Per Share.” This standard addresses whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating securities prior to vesting and, therefore, need to be included in the allocation in computing earnings per share under the two-class method described in FASB ASC 260, “Earnings Per Share”. The FASB concluded that all outstanding unvested share-based payment awards that contain rights to nonforfeitable dividends participate in undistributed earnings with common shareholders. If awards are considered participating securities, the Company is required to apply the two-class method of computing basic and diluted earnings per share. The Company has determined that its outstanding unvested shares are participating securities. Accordingly, effective January 1, 2009, earnings per common share are computed using the two-class method prescribed by ASC 260. All previously reported earnings per common share data has been retrospectively adjusted to conform to the new computation method (see Note 4).

 

In December 2007, the FASB issued an update to ASC 805 “Business Combinations.” The objective of the standard is to establish principles and requirements for how an acquirer in a business combination recognizes and measures in its financial statements, the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any controlling interest; recognizes and measures the goodwill acquired in the business combination or a gain from a bargain purchase; and determines what information to disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the

 

nature and financial effects of the business combination. This standard is to be applied prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after an entity’s fiscal year that begins after December 15, 2008. The Company will adopt this standard for all future acquisitions.

 

In December 2007, the FASB issued an update to ASC 810 “Consolidation.” The objective of the standard is to change the financial accounting and reporting for noncontrolling (or minority) interests in consolidated financial statements. The provisions of this standard in part; establish accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary; clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should be reported as equity in the consolidated financial statements; establishes a single method of accounting for changes in a parent’s ownership interest in a subsidiary that do not result in deconsolidation; requires that a parent recognize a gain or loss in net income when a subsidiary is deconsolidated; and requires expanded disclosures in the consolidated financial statements that clearly identify and distinguish between the interests of the parent’s owners and the interests of the noncontrolling owners of a subsidiary. ASC 810 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The adoption of this standard effective January 2009 did not have an effect on the consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.

 

 

As of January 1, 2009, the Company changed its method for accounting for certain inventories fromlast-in,first-out (LIFO) tofirst-in,first-out (FIFO). The company applied this change in accounting principle retrospectively in accordance with FASB ASC 250, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections” (see Note 5).

 

 

During the past five quarters, we have recorded restructuring costs as a result of cost reduction efforts and facility closings. Accruals have been recorded based on these costs and primarily consist of employee termination benefits. We record accruals for employee termination benefits based on the guidance of FASB ASC 420, “Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations.” These expenses are included in Restructuring expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations while the restructuring accruals are included in Accrued expenses in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

 

 

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company recorded pre-tax restructuring expenses totaling $2.8 million and $8.3 million, respectively, for employee severance related to employee reductions across various functional areas as well as facility closures resulting from the Company’s cost savings initiatives. These initiatives included severance benefits for 384 employees. The Company is anticipating the employee reductions to be completed by the end of 2009 with an expected additional total cost of $2.0 — $3.0 million during the fourth quarter, with severance payments expected to be fully paid by the end of 2010 using cash from operations.

 

 

For the full year 2008, the Company recorded pre-tax restructuring expenses totaling $18.0 million for employee severance related to employee reductions across various functional areas as well as facility closures resulting from our cost savings initiatives. These initiatives included severance benefits for 380 employees. These employee reductions were completed by the end of 2008, with severance payments expected to be fully paid by the end of 2009 using cash from operations.

 

 

Pre-tax restructuring expenses, by segment for the three months ended September 30, 2009, were as follows:

 

 

Pre-tax restructuring expenses, by segment for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, were as follows:

 

 

Restructuring accruals of $9.3 million at both September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, are reflected in Accrued expenses in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as follows:

 

 

 

The Company consists of four reportable segments: Fluid & Metering Technologies, Health & Science Technologies, Dispensing Equipment and Fire & Safety/Diversified Products.

 

The Fluid & Metering Technologies Segment produces pumps, flow meters, and related controls for the movement of liquids and gases in a diverse range of end markets from industrial infrastructure to food and beverage. The Health & Science Technologies Segment produces a wide variety of small-scale, highly accurate pumps, valves, fittings and medical devices, as well as compressors used in medical, dental and industrial applications. The Dispensing Equipment Segment produces highly engineered equipment for dispensing, metering and mixing colorants, paints, inks and dyes, refinishing equipment, as well as the food industry. The Fire & Safety/Diversified Products Segment produces firefighting pumps, rescue tools, lifting bags and other components and systems for the

 

 

fire and rescue industry, as well as engineered stainless steel banding and clamping devices used in a variety of industrial and commercial applications.

 

Information on the Company’s business segments is presented below, based on the nature of products and services offered. The Company evaluates performance based on several factors, of which operating income is the primary financial measure. Intersegment sales are accounted for at fair value as if the sales were to third parties.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings per common share (“EPS”) is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares of common stock (basic) plus common stock equivalents outstanding (diluted) during the period. Common stock equivalents consist of stock options, which have been included in the calculation of weighted average shares outstanding using the treasury stock method, unvested shares, and shares issuable in connection with certain deferred compensation agreements (“DCUs”).

 

ASC 260, “Earnings Per Share”, concludes that all outstanding unvested share-based payment awards that contain rights to nonforfeitable dividends participate in undistributed earnings with common shareholders. If awards are considered participating securities, the Corporation is required to apply the two-class method of computing basic and diluted earnings per share. The Corporation has determined that its outstanding unvested shares are participating securities. Accordingly, effective January 1, 2009, earnings per common share are computed using the two-class method prescribed by ASC 260. All previously reported earnings per common share data has been retrospectively adjusted to conform to the new computation method. Net income attributable to common shareholders was reduced by $0.2 million and $0.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Net income attributable to common shareholders was reduced by $0.6 million and $0.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

 

Basic weighted average shares reconciles to diluted weighted average shares as follows:

 

 

Options to purchase approximately 2.5 million and 2.0 million shares of common stock as of September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, were not included in the computation of diluted EPS because the exercise price was greater than the average market price of the Company’s common stock and, therefore, the effect of their inclusion would be antidilutive.

 

 

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost, which includes material, labor, and factory overhead, is determined on a FIFO basis.

 

 

Prior to 2009, we valued certain inventories under the LIFO cost method. As of January 1, 2009, we changed our method of accounting for these inventories from the LIFO method to the FIFO method. As of December 31, 2008, the inventories for which the LIFO method of accounting was applied represented approximately 85% of total net inventories. We believe that this change is to a preferable method which better reflects the current cost of inventory on our consolidated balance sheets. Additionally, this change conforms all of our worldwide inventories to a consistent inventory costing method and provides better comparability to our peers. We applied this change in accounting principle retrospectively to all prior periods presented herein in accordance with FASB ASC 250, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections.” As a result of this accounting change, our retained earnings as of December 31, 2008 decreased to $822.3 million using the FIFO method from $845.4 million as originally reported using the LIFO method. The following tables summarize the effect of the accounting change on our consolidated financial statements.

 

 

 

 

 

The revised components of inventories as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 were as follows:

 

 

 

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, by reporting segment, were as follows:

 

 

For acquisitions completed in the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company is in the process of finalizing appraisals of tangible and intangible assets and is continuing to complete the purchase price allocations, which will be adjusted as additional information relative to the fair values of the assets and liabilities becomes known.

 

Acquisition adjustments during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 primarily relate to restructuring charges and other fair value adjustments of $4.3 million recorded by Richter Chemie-Technik, a business unit within the Company’s Fluid & Metering Technologies Segment, offset by other various acquisition adjustments. The restructuring charges were primarily employee severance related to employee reductions across various functional areas.

 

ASC 350, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” requires that goodwill be tested for impairment at the reporting unit level on an annual basis and between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below its carrying value. Annually on October 31^st, goodwill and other acquired intangible assets with indefinite lives are tested for impairment. The Company concluded that the fair value of each of the reporting units was in excess of the carrying value as of

 

 

October 31, 2008. The Company did not consider there to be any triggering event that would require an interim impairment assessment, therefore none of the goodwill or other acquired intangible assets with indefinite lives were tested for impairment during the nine months ended September 30, 2009.

 

The following table provides the gross carrying value and accumulated amortization for each major class of intangible asset as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008:

 

 

The Banjo trade name is an indefinite lived intangible asset which is tested for impairment on an annual basis or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired.

 

 

The components of accrued expenses as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 were:

 

 

 

 

 

Borrowings at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 consisted of the following:

 

 

The Company maintains a $600.0 million unsecured domestic, multi-currency bank revolving credit facility (“Credit Facility”), which expires on December 21, 2011. In 2008, the Credit Facility was amended to allow the Company to designate certain foreign subsidiaries as designated borrowers. Upon approval from the lenders, the designated borrowers were allowed to receive loans under the Credit Facility. A designated borrower sublimit was established as the lesser of the aggregate commitments or $100.0 million. As of the amendment date, Fluid Management Europe B.V., (FME) was approved by the lenders as a designated borrower. FME’s borrowings under the Credit Facility at September 30, 2009 were approximately $65.7 million (Euro 45.0 million). As the FME borrowings under the Credit Facility are Euro denominated and the cash flows that will be used to make payments of principal and interest are predominately denominated in Euros, the Company does not anticipate any significant foreign exchange gains or losses in servicing this debt.

 

At September 30, 2009 there was $347.7 million outstanding under the Credit Facility and outstanding letters of credit totaled approximately $7.1 million. The net available borrowing under the Credit Facility as of September 30, 2009, was approximately $245.2 million. Interest is payable quarterly on the outstanding borrowings at the bank agent’s reference rate. Interest on borrowings based on LIBOR plus an applicable margin is payable on the maturity date of the borrowing, or quarterly from the effective date for borrowings exceeding three months. The applicable margin is based on the Company’s senior, unsecured, long-term debt rating and can range from 24 basis points to 50 basis points. Based on the Company’s BBB rating at September 30, 2009, the applicable margin was 40 basis points. An annual Credit Facility fee, also based on the Company’s credit rating, is currently 10 basis points and is payable quarterly.

 

At September 30, 2009 the Company had one interest rate exchange agreement related to the Credit Facility. The interest rate exchange agreement, expiring in January 2011, effectively converted $250.0 million of floating-rate debt into fixed-rate debt at an interest rate of 3.25%. The fixed rate noted above is comprised of the fixed rate on the interest rate exchange agreement and the Company’s current margin of 40 basis points on the Credit Facility.

 

On April 18, 2008, the Company completed a $100.0 million unsecured senior bank term loan agreement (“Term Loan”) with covenants consistent with the existing Credit Facility and a maturity on December 21, 2011. At September 30, 2009, there was $95.0 million outstanding under the Term Loan with $5.0 million included within short term borrowings. Interest under the Term Loan is based on the bank agent’s reference rate or LIBOR plus an applicable margin and is payable at the end of the selected interest period, but at least quarterly. The applicable margin is based on the Company’s senior, unsecured, long-term debt rating and can range from 45 to 100 basis points. Based on the Company’s current debt rating, the applicable margin is 80 basis points. The Term Loan requires repayments of $5.0 million and $7.5 million in April of 2010 and 2011, respectively, with the remaining balance due on December 21, 2011. The Company used the proceeds from the Term Loan to pay down existing debt outstanding under the Credit Facility.

 

At September 30, 2009 the Company had an interest rate exchange agreement related to the Term Loan that expires December 2011. With a current notional amount of $95.0 million, the agreement effectively converted $100.0 million of floating-rate debt into fixed-rate debt at an interest rate of 4.00%. The fixed rate is comprised of the fixed rate on the interest rate exchange agreement and the Company’s current margin of 80 basis points on the Term Loan.

 

 

ASC 815 “Derivatives and Hedging”, requires that a Company with derivative instruments disclose information to enable users of the financial statements to understand: how and why an entity uses derivative instruments; how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for; and how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. As such, ASC 815 requires qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about fair value amounts of and gains and losses on derivative instruments, and disclosures about credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative agreements.

 

The Company enters into cash flow hedges to reduce the exposure to variability in certain expected future cash flows. The type of cash flow hedges the Company enters into includes foreign currency contracts and interest rate exchange agreements that effectively convert a portion of floating-rate debt to fixed-rate debt and are designed to reduce the impact of interest rate changes on future interest expense.

 

The effective portion of gains or losses on interest rate exchange agreements is reported in accumulated other comprehensive income in shareholders’ equity and reclassified into net income in the same period or periods in which the hedged transaction affects net income. The remaining gain or loss in excess of the cumulative change in the present value of future cash flows or the hedged item, if any, is recognized into net income during the period of change.

 

Fair values relating to derivative financial instruments reflect the estimated amounts that the Company would receive or pay to sell or buy the contracts based on quoted market prices of comparable contracts at each balance sheet date.

 

At September 30, 2009, the Company had two interest rate exchange agreements. The first interest rate exchange agreement, expiring in January 2011, effectively converted $250.0 million of floating-rate debt into fixed-rate debt at an interest rate of 3.25%. The second interest rate exchange agreement, expiring December 2011, with a current notional amount of $95.0 million, effectively converted $100.0 million of floating-rate debt into fixed-rate debt at an interest rate of 4.00%. The fixed rate is comprised of the fixed rate on the interest rate exchange agreements and the Company’s current margin of 40 basis points for the Credit Facility and 80 basis points on the Term Loan.

 

Based on interest rates at September 30, 2009, approximately $9.3 million of the amount included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in shareholders’ equity at September 30, 2009 will be recognized to net income over the next 12 months as the underlying hedged transactions are realized.

 

At September 30, 2009, the Company had foreign currency exchange contracts with an aggregate notional amount of $3.4 million to manage its exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. The change in fair market value of these contracts for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was immaterial.

 

The following tables set forth the fair value amounts of derivative instruments held by the Company as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008:

 

 

 

The following tables summarize the gain (loss) recognized and the amounts and location of income (expense) and gain (loss) reclassified into income for interest rate contracts and foreign currency contracts as of September 30, 2009 and 2008: