Pacific Premier Bancorp - 10-Q quarterly report FY2016 Q1

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

(X) QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2016

( ) TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _______ to _______

Commission File Number 0-22193

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



DELAWARE	33-0743196
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S Employer Identification No.)

17901 VON KARMAN AVENUE, SUITE 1200, IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92614

(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)

(949) 864-8000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [ X ] No [_]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [X] No [_]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “accelerated filer”, “large accelerated filer”, and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).



Large accelerated filer	[ ]	Accelerated filer	[X]	Non-accelerated filer (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	[ ]	Smaller reporting company	[ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). Yes [ ] No [X]

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock as of May 6, 2016 was 27,548,233.

Table of Contents

PACIFIC PREMIER BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

FORM 10-Q

INDEX

FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2016



PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1 - Financial Statements

Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition	3

Consolidated Statements of Operations	4

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income	5

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity	6

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	7

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	8

Item 2 - Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	40

Item 3 - Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	70

Item 4 - Controls and Procedures	70

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION	71

Item 1 - Legal Proceedings	71

Item 1A - Risk Factors	71

Item 2 - Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	71

Item 3 - Defaults Upon Senior Securities	71

Item 4 - Mine Safety Disclosures	71

Item 5 - Other Information	72

Item 6 - Exhibits	72

Table of Contents

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

PACIFIC PREMIER BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

(dollars in thousands)



ASSETS	March 31, 2016			December 31, 2015			March 31, 2015
	(Unaudited)			(Audited)			(Unaudited)
Cash and due from banks	$	18,624		$	14,935		$	91,412
Interest bearing deposits with financial institutions	174,890			63,482			86,959
Cash and cash equivalents	193,514			78,417			178,371
Interest bearing time deposits with financial institutions	3,944			1,972			—
Investments held to maturity, at amortized cost	9,590			9,642			—
Investment securities available for sale, at fair value	269,711			280,273			280,461
FHLB, FRB and other stock, at cost	25,853			22,292			30,586
Loans held for sale at lower of cost or market	7,281			8,565			—
Loans held for investment	2,851,432			2,254,315			2,131,387
Allowance for loan losses	(18,455		)	(17,317		)	(13,646		)
Loans held for investment, net	2,832,977			2,236,998			2,117,741
Accrued interest receivable	11,862			9,315			8,769
Other real estate owned	1,161			1,161			997
Premises and equipment	11,817			9,248			9,591
Deferred income taxes, net	17,000			11,511			12,815
Bank owned life insurance	39,535			39,245			38,377
Intangible assets	11,145			7,170			8,203
Goodwill	102,085			50,832			51,010
Other assets	25,610			24,005			16,079
TOTAL ASSETS	$	3,563,085		$	2,790,646		$	2,753,000
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
LIABILITIES:
Deposit accounts:
Noninterest bearing checking	$	1,064,457		$	711,771		$	619,763
Interest-bearing:
Checking	160,707			134,999			130,869
Money market/savings	1,096,334			827,378			809,408
Retail certificates of deposit	455,637			365,911			406,649
Wholesale/brokered certificates of deposit	129,129			155,064			76,477
Total interest-bearing	1,841,807			1,483,352			1,423,403
Total deposits	2,906,264			2,195,123			2,043,166
FHLB advances and other borrowings	124,956			196,125			343,434
Subordinated debentures	70,310			70,310			70,310
Accrued expenses and other liabilities	32,661			30,108			22,843
TOTAL LIABILITIES	3,134,191			2,491,666			2,479,753
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
Common stock, $.01 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized; 27,537,233 shares at March 31, 2016, 21,570,746 shares at December 31, 2015, and 21,387,818 shares at March 31, 2015 issued and outstanding	273			215			214
Additional paid-in capital	341,660			221,487			218,528
Retained earnings	85,500			76,946			53,220
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax	1,461			332			1,285
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY	428,894			298,980			273,247
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY	$	3,563,085		$	2,790,646		$	2,753,000

Accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

PACIFIC PREMIER BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

(unaudited)



	Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2016			December 31, 2015			March 31, 2015
INTEREST INCOME
Loans	$	35,407		$	30,181		$	25,070
Investment securities and other interest-earning assets	2,098			1,730			1,557
Total interest income	37,505			31,911			26,627
INTEREST EXPENSE
Deposits	2,069			1,713			1,606
FHLB advances and other borrowings	325			370			375
Subordinated debentures	910			991			971
Total interest expense	3,304			3,074			2,952
NET INTEREST INCOME BEFORE PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES	34,201			28,837			23,675
PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES	1,120			1,700			1,830
NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES	33,081			27,137			21,845
NONINTEREST INCOME
Loan servicing fees	327			348			344
Deposit fees	842			686			582
Net gain from sales of loans	1,906			2,705			—
Net gain from sales of investment securities	753			(4		)	116
Other-than-temporary-impairment loss on investment securities	(207		)	—			—
Other income	1,241			482			427
Total noninterest income	4,862			4,217			1,469
NONINTEREST EXPENSE
Compensation and benefits	12,080			10,030			9,522
Premises and occupancy	2,391			2,141			1,829
Data processing and communications	911			715			702
Other real estate owned operations, net	8			7			48
FDIC insurance premiums	382			345			314
Legal, audit and professional expense	865			826			521
Marketing expense	630			519			603
Office and postage expense	481			478			499
Loan expense	403			439			193
Deposit expense	1,019			938			805
Merger-related expense	3,119			407			3,992
CDI amortization	344			345			314
Other expense	1,014			1,349			1,127
Total noninterest expense	23,647			18,539			20,469
NET INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX	14,296			12,815			2,845
INCOME TAX	5,742			4,750			1,056
NET INCOME	$	8,554		$	8,065		$	1,789
EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic	$	0.33		$	0.38		$	0.09
Diluted	0.33			0.37			0.09
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING
Basic	25,555,654			21,510,746			20,091,924
Diluted	25,952,184			21,941,035			20,382,832

Accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

PACIFIC PREMIER BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(dollars in thousands)

(unaudited)



	Three Months Ended
	March 31,			December 31,			March 31,
	2016			2015			2015
Net income	$	8,554		$	8,065		$	1,789
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
Unrealized holding gains on securities arising during the period, net of income taxes (1)	1,565			(349		)	835
Reclassification adjustment for net gain on sale of securities included in net income, net of income taxes (2)	(436		)	2			(68		)
Net unrealized gain on securities, net of income taxes	1,129			(347		)	767
Comprehensive income	$	9,683		$	7,718		$	2,556

______________________________

(1) Income tax (benefit) on the unrealized gains (losses) on securities was $1.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2016, $(247,000) for the three months ended December 31, 2015, and $584,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2015.

(2) Income tax (benefit) on the reclassification adjustment for net (gains) losses on sale of securities included in net income was $317,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2016, $(2,000) for the three months ended December 31, 2015, and $48,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2015.

Accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

PACIFIC PREMIER BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2016 AND 2015

(dollars in thousands)

(unaudited)



	Common Stock Shares		Common Stock		Additional Paid-in Capital			Accumulated Retained Earnings		Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income		Total Stockholders’ Equity
Balance at December 31, 2015	21,570,746		$	215	$	221,487		$	76,946	$	332	$	298,980
Net income	—		—		—			8,554		—		8,554
Other comprehensive income	—		—		—			—		1,129		1,129
Share-based compensation expense	—		—		461			—		—		461
Issuance of restricted stock, net	118,936		—		—			—		—		—
Common stock issued	5,815,051		58		119,325			—		—		119,383
Exercise of stock options	32,500		—		387			—		—		387
Balance at March 31, 2016	27,537,233		$	273	$	341,660		$	85,500	$	1,461	$	428,894

Balance at December 31, 2014	16,903,884		$	169	$	147,474		$	51,431	$	518	$	199,592
Net income	—		—		—			1,789		—		1,789
Other comprehensive income	—		—		—			—		767		767
Share-based compensation expense	—		—		200			—		—		200
Common stock issued	4,480,645		45		70,884			—		—		70,929
Warrants exercised	2,456		—		15			—		—		15
Repurchase of common stock	(5,833	)	—		(93		)	—		—		(93		)
Exercise of stock options	6,666		—		48			—		—		48
Balance at March 31, 2015	21,387,818		$	214	$	218,528		$	53,220	$	1,285	$	273,247

Accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

PACIFIC PREMIER BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)

(unaudited)



	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2016			2015
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income	$	8,554		$	1,789
Adjustments to net income:
Depreciation and amortization expense	670			253
Provision for loan losses	1,120			1,830
Share-based compensation expense	461			200
Loss on sale of or write down of other real estate owned	—			40
Amortization of premium/(discounts) on securities held for sale, net	1,057			804
Net accretion of discounts/premiums for loans acquired and deferred loan fees/costs	(2,584		)	(371		)
Gain on sale of investment securities available for sale	(753		)	(116		)
Originations of loans held for sale	(18,899		)	—
Proceeds from the sales of and principal payments from loans held for sale	22,616			—
Gain on sale of loans	(1,906		)	—
Deferred income tax benefit	(325		)	—
Change in accrued expenses and other liabilities, net	(5,499		)	1,144
Income from bank owned life insurance, net	(290		)	(279		)
Amortization of core deposit intangible	344			314
Change in accrued interest receivable and other assets, net	4,925			(5,248		)
Net cash provided by operating activities	9,491			360
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from sale of loans	—			106,409
Increase in loans, net	(138,358		)	(275,937		)
Principal payments on securities available for sale	9,676			6,851
Purchase of securities available for sale	—			(40,077		)
Proceeds from sale or maturity of securities available for sale	192,809			8,771
Proceeds from the sale of premises and equipment	3,294			—
Purchases of premises and equipment	(2,177		)	(525		)
(Purchase) redemption of Federal Reserve Bank stock	(465		)	506
Purchase of Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco stock	(3,096		)	(11,656		)
Cash acquired in acquisitions	40,156			2,961
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities	101,839			(202,697		)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Net increase in deposit accounts	74,549			76,322
Change in FHLB advances and other borrowings, net	(71,169		)	193,491
Proceeds from exercise of stock options and warrants	387			48
Warrants exercised	—			15
Repurchase of common stock	—			(93		)
Net cash provided by financing activities	3,767			269,783
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents	115,097			67,446
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year	78,417			110,925
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year	$	193,514		$	178,371


SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW DISCLOSURES
Interest paid	$	4,182		$	3,853
Income taxes paid	136			3,700
Assets acquired (liabilities assumed and capital created) in acquisitions (See Note 4):
Investment securities	190,254			53,752
FHLB and Other Stock	3,671			2,369
Loans	456,158			332,893
Core deposit intangible	4,319			2,903
Deferred income tax	7,069			3,969
Bank owned life insurance	—			11,276
Goodwill	51,252			28,060
Fixed assets	4,356			2,134
Other assets	5,610			1,726
Deposits	(636,591		)	(336,018		)
Other borrowings	—			(33,300		)
Other liabilities	(8,843		)	(1,796		)
Common stock and additional paid-in capital	(119,383		)	(70,929		)

Accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

PACIFIC PREMIER BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

March 31, 2016

(UNAUDITED)

Note 1 - Basis of Presentation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Pacific Premier Bancorp, Inc. (the “Corporation”) and its wholly owned subsidiaries, including Pacific Premier Bank (the “Bank”) (collectively, the “Company,” “we,” “our” or “us”). All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

In the opinion of management, the consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) necessary to present fairly the Company’s financial position as of March 31, 2016, December 31, 2015 and March 31, 2015, the results of its operations and comprehensive income for the three months ended March 31, 2016, December 31, 2015 and March 31, 2015 and the changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015. Operating results or comprehensive income for the three months ended March 31, 2016 are not necessarily indicative of the results or comprehensive income that may be expected for any other interim period or the full year ending December 31, 2016.

Certain information and note disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 (the “2015 Annual Report”).

The Company accounts for its investments in its wholly owned special purpose entity, PPBI Trust I, under the equity method whereby the subsidiary’s net earnings are recognized in the Company’s statement of operations.

Note 2 – Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

Accounting Standards Adopted in 2016

In March 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-03, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350); Business Combinations (Topic 805); Consolidation (Topic 810); Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Effective Date and Transition Guidance. The amendments make the guidance in ASU’s 2014-02, 2014-03, 2014-07 and 2014-08 effective immediately by removing their effective dates. Subsequent changes to an accounting policy election requires justification under Topic 250, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections. The Update became effective immediately and the Company adopted the provisions of ASU 2016-03 immediately. The adoption of this guidance had no impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, Interest-Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs. The amendments change the balance sheet presentation for debt issuance costs. Under the new guidance, debt issuance costs should be reported as a deduction from debt liabilities rather than as a deferred charge classified as an asset. The Update is effective for us in first quarter 2016 with retrospective application. Early adoption is permitted. The Company adopted the provisions of ASU 2015-03 effective January 1, 2016. The adoption of this guidance had no impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

Accounting Standards Pending Adoption

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Accounting. The amendments simplify several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment award transactions, including accounting for excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies, classifying excess tax benefits on the statement of cash flows, accounting for forfeitures, classifying awards that permit share repurchases to satisfy statutory tax-withholding requirements and classifying tax payments on behalf of employees on the statement of cash flows. For public business entities, the amendment is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016 and interim period within those annual periods. Early adopt is permitted for any organization in any interim or annual period. The Company is currently evaluating the effects of ASU 2016-09 on its financial statements and disclosures.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal Versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross Versus Net). The amendments address how an entity should assess whether it is the principal or the agent in contracts that include three or more parties. The ASU clarifies that an entity should evaluate whether it is the principal or the agent for each specified good or service promised in a contract with a customer. The amendments affect the guidance in ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which is not yet effective. The effective date and transition requirements for the amendments in this ASU are the same as the effective date and transition of ASU 2014-09, which will be effective for the Company for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company does not expect these amendments to have a material effect on its financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-07, Investments-Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323): Simplifying the Transition to the Equity Method of Accounting. The amendments eliminate the requirement to retrospectively apply the equity method to an investment that subsequently qualifies for such accounting as a result of an increase in the level of ownership interest or degree of influence. As result, when an investment qualifies for the equity method, the equity method investor will add the cost of acquiring the additional interest in the investee to the current basis of the investor’s previously held interest and adopt the equity method of account as of the date the investment becomes qualified for equity method accounting. The amendments further require unrealized holding gains or losses in accumulated other comprehensive income related to an available-for-sale security that becomes eligible for the equity method to be recognized in earnings as of the date on which the investment qualifies for the equity method. The amendments are effective for all entities for fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company does not expect these amendments to have a material effect on its financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-06, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Contingent Put and Call Options in Debt Instruments. The amendments clarify the required steps to be taken when assessing whether the economic characteristics and risks of call/put options are clearly and closely related to those of their debt hosts - which is one of the criteria for bifurcating an embedded derivative. The Update is effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2016, including interim periods within those years. The Company does not expect these amendments to have a material effect on its financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-05, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Effect of Derivative Contract Novations on Existing Hedge Accounting Relationships. The amendments clarify that a change in the counterparty to a derivative instrument designated as a hedging instrument does not, in and of itself, require dedesignation of that hedging relationship provided that all other hedge accounting criteria remain the same. The Update is effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2016, including interim periods within those years. The Company does not expect these amendments to have a material effect on its financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). The new standard is being issued to increase the transparency and comparability around lease obligations. Previously unrecorded off-balance sheet obligations will now be brought more prominently to light by presenting lease liabilities on the face of the balance

Table of Contents

sheet, accompanied by enhanced qualitative and quantitative disclosures in the notes to the financial statements. The Update is generally effective for public business entities in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the effects of ASU 2016-02 on its financial statements and disclosures.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, Financial Instruments-Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. Changes made to the current measurement model primarily affect the accounting for equity securities with readily determinable fair values, where changes in fair value will impact earnings instead of other comprehensive income. The accounting for other financial instruments, such as loans, investments in debt securities, and financial liabilities is largely unchanged. The Update also changes the presentation and disclosure requirements for financial instruments including a requirement that public business entities use exit price when measuring the fair value of financial instruments measured at amortized cost for disclosure purposes. This Update is generally effective for public business entities in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the effects of ASU 2016-01 on its financial statements and disclosures.

In August 2015, the FASB deferred the effective date of ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). As a result of the deferral, the guidance in ASU 2014-09 will be effective for the Company for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Update modifies the guidance companies use to recognize revenue from contracts with customers for transfers of goods or services and transfers of nonfinancial assets, unless those contracts are within the scope of other standards. The guidance also requires new qualitative and quantitative disclosures, including information about contract balances and performance obligations. The Company does not expect these amendments to have a material effect on its financial statements.

Note 3 – Significant Accounting Policies

Certain Acquired Loans: As part of business acquisitions, the Bank acquires certain loans that have shown evidence of credit deterioration since origination. These acquired loans are recorded at the allocated fair value, such that there is no carryover of the seller’s allowance for loan losses. Such acquired loans are accounted for individually. The Bank estimates the amount and timing of expected cash flows for each purchased loan, and the expected cash flows in excess of the allocated fair value is recorded as interest income over the remaining life of the loan (accretable yield). The excess of the loan’s contractual principal and interest over expected cash flows is not recorded (non-accretable difference). Over the life of the loan, expected cash flows continue to be estimated. If the present value of expected cash flows is less than the carrying amount, a loss is recorded through the allowance for loan losses. If the present value of expected cash flows is greater than the carrying amount, it is recognized as part of future interest income.

Goodwill and Core Deposit Intangible: Goodwill is generally determined as the excess of the fair value of the consideration transferred, plus the fair value of any noncontrolling interests in the acquiree, over the fair value of the net assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date. Goodwill and intangible assets acquired in a purchase business combination and determined to have an indefinite useful life are not amortized, but tested for impairment at least annually or more frequently if events and circumstances exist that indicate the necessity for such impairment tests to be performed. The Company has selected December 31 as the date to perform the annual impairment test. Intangible assets with definite useful lives are amortized over their estimated useful lives to their estimated residual values. Goodwill is the only intangible asset with an indefinite life on our balance sheet.

Core deposit intangible assets arising from whole bank acquisitions are amortized on a straight-line amortization method over their estimated useful lives, which range from 6 to 10 years.

Use of Estimates: The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The allowance for loan losses, the fair value of stock-

Table of Contents

based compensation awards, the fair values of financial instruments and the status of contingencies are particularly subject to change.

Note 4 – Acquisitions

The Company accounted for the following transactions under the acquisition method of accounting which requires purchased assets and liabilities assumed to be recorded at their respective fair values at the date of acquisition. The Company determined the fair value of the core deposit intangible, securities and deposits with the assistance of third party valuations.

The estimated fair values in these acquisitions are subject to refinement as additional information relative to the closing date fair values become available through the measurement period, which can extend for up to one year after the closing date of the transaction. While additional significant changes to the closing date fair values are not expected, any information relative to the changes in these fair values will be evaluated to determine if such changes are due to events and circumstances that existed as of the acquisition date. During the measurement period, any such changes will be recorded as part of the closing date fair value.

Security California Bancorp Acquisition

On January 31, 2016, the Company completed its acquisition of Security California Bancorp (“SCAF”) whereby we acquired $714 million in total assets, $456 million in loans and $637 million in total deposits. Under the terms of the merger agreement, each share of Security common stock was converted into the right to receive 0.9629 shares of the Corporation’s common stock. The value of the total deal consideration was $120 million, which includes $788,000 of aggregate cash consideration to the holders of SCAF stock options and the issuance of 5,815,051 shares of the Corporation’s common stock, valued at $119.4 million based on a closing stock price of $20.53 per share on January 29, 2016.

SCAF was the holding company of Security Bank of California, a Riverside, California, based state-chartered bank with six branches located in Riverside County, San Bernardino County and Orange County.

Goodwill in the amount of $51.3 million was recognized in the SCAF acquisition. Goodwill represents the future economic benefits arising from net assets acquired that are not individually identified and separately recognized and is attributable to synergies expected to be derived from the combination of the two entities. Goodwill recognized in this transaction is not deductible for income tax purposes.

Table of Contents

The following table represents the assets acquired and liabilities assumed of SCAF as of January 31, 2016 and the provisional fair value adjustments and amounts recorded by the Company in 2016 under the acquisition method of accounting:



	SCAF Book Value			Fair Value Adjustments			Fair Value
ASSETS ACQUIRED	(dollars in thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents	$	40,947		$	—		$	40,947
Interest bearing deposits with financial institutions	1,972			—			1,972
Investment securities	191,881			(1,627		)	190,254
Loans, gross	467,197			(11,039		)	456,158
Allowance for loan losses	(7,399		)	7,399			—
Fixed assets	5,335			(979		)	4,356
Core deposit intangible	493			3,826			4,319
Deferred tax assets	5,618			1,451			7,069
Other assets	10,589			(1,308		)	9,281
Total assets acquired	$	716,633		$	(2,277	)	$	714,356
LIABILITIES ASSUMED
Deposits	$	636,450		$	141		$	636,591
Other Liabilities	9,063			(220		)	8,843
Total liabilities assumed	645,513			(79		)	645,434
Excess of assets acquired over liabilities assumed	$	71,120		$	(2,198	)	68,922
Consideration paid							120,174
Goodwill recognized							$	51,252

Independence Bank Acquisition

On January 26, 2015, the Company completed its acquisition of Independence Bank (“IDPK”) in exchange for consideration valued at $79.8 million, which consisted of $6.1 million of cash consideration for IDPK common stockholders, $1.5 million of aggregate cash consideration to the holders of IDPK stock options and warrants, $1.3 million fair market value of warrants assumed and the issuance of 4,480,645 shares of the Corporation’s common stock, which was valued at $70.9 million based on the closing stock price of the Corporation’s common stock on January 26, 2015 of $15.83 per share.

IDPK was a Newport Beach, California based state-chartered bank. The acquisition was an opportunity for the Company to strengthen its competitive position as one of the premier community banks headquartered in Southern California. Additionally, the IDPK acquisition enhanced and connected the Company’s footprint in Southern California.

Goodwill in the amount of $27.9 million was recognized in the IDPK acquisition. Goodwill represents the future economic benefits arising from net assets acquired that are not individually identified and separately recognized and is attributable to synergies expected to be derived from the combination of the two entities. Goodwill recognized in this transaction is not deductible for income tax purposes.

Table of Contents

The following table represents the assets acquired and liabilities assumed of IDPK as of January 26, 2015 and the fair value adjustments and amounts recorded by the Company in 2015 under the acquisition method of accounting:



	IDPK Book Value			Fair Value Adjustments			Fair Value
	(dollars in thousands)
ASSETS ACQUIRED
Cash and cash equivalents	$	10,486		$	—		$	10,486
Investment securities	56,503			(382		)	56,121
Loans, gross	339,502			(6,609		)	332,893
Allowance for loan losses	(3,301		)	3,301			—
Deferred income taxes	5,266			(472		)	4,794
Bank owned life insurance	11,276			—			11,276
Core deposit intangible	904			1,999			2,903
Other assets	3,756			780			4,536
Total assets acquired	$	424,392		$	(1,383	)	$	423,009

LIABILITIES ASSUMED
Deposits	$	335,685		$	333		$	336,018
FHLB advances	33,300			—			33,300
Other liabilities	1,916			(120		)	1,796
Total liabilities assumed	370,901			213			371,114
Excess of assets acquired over liabilities assumed	$	53,491		$	(1,596	)	51,895
Consideration paid							79,777
Goodwill recognized							$	27,882

For loans acquired from SCAF and IDPK, the contractual amounts due, expected cash flows to be collected, interest component and fair value as of the respective acquisition dates were as follows:



	Acquired Loans
	SCAF		IDPK
	(dollars in thousands)
Contractual amounts due	$	539,806	$	453,987
Cash flows not expected to be collected	2,765		3,795
Expected cash flows	537,041		450,192
Interest component of expected cash flows	80,883		117,299
Fair value of acquired loans	$	456,158	$	332,893

In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, there was no carryover of the allowance for loan losses that had been previously recorded by SCAF or IDPK.

Table of Contents

The operating results of the Company for the three months ending March 31, 2016 include the operating results of SCAF and IDPK since their respective acquisition dates. The operating results of the Company for the three months ending March 31, 2015 include the operating results of IDPK since its acquisition date. The following table presents the net interest and other income, net income and earnings per share as if the acquisitions of SCAF and IDPK were effective as of January 1, 2016 and 2015. There were no material, nonrecurring adjustments to the pro forma net interest and other income, net income and earnings per share presented below:



	Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2016		December 31, 2015		March 31, 2015
Net interest and other income	$	40,090	$	38,296	$	30,570
Net income	6,583		8,612		1,993
Basic earnings per share	0.26		0.31		0.07
Diluted earnings per share	0.25		0.31		0.07

Note 5 – Investment Securities

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of securities were as follows:



	March 31, 2016
	Amortized Cost		Unrealized Gain		Unrealized Loss			Estimated Fair Value
	(in thousands)
Available-for-sale:
Municipal bonds	$	123,484	$	2,426	$	(28	)	$	125,882
Collateralized mortgage obligation	23,805		70		(9		)	23,866
Mortgage-backed securities	119,939		499		(475		)	119,963
Total available-for-sale	267,228		2,995		(512		)	269,711
Held-to-maturity:
Mortgage-backed securities	8,361		22		—			8,383
Other	1,229		—		—			1,229
Total held-to-maturity	9,590		22		—			9,612
Total securities	$	276,818	$	3,017	$	(512	)	$	279,323

Table of Contents



	December 31, 2015
	Amortized Cost		Unrealized Gain		Unrealized Loss			Estimated Fair Value
	(in thousands)
Available-for-sale:
Municipal bonds	$	128,546	$	1,796	$	(97	)	$	130,245
Collateralized mortgage obligation	24,722		4		(183		)	24,543
Mortgage-backed securities	126,443		153		(1,111		)	125,485
Total available-for-sale	279,711		1,953		(1,391		)	$	280,273
Held-to-maturity:
Mortgage-backed securities	8,400		—		(70		)	8,330
Other	1,242		—		—			1,242
Total held-to-maturity	9,642		—		(70		)	9,572
Total securities	$	289,353	$	1,953	$	(1,461	)	$	289,845



	March 31, 2015
	Amortized Cost		Unrealized Gain		Unrealized Loss			Estimated Fair Value
	(in thousands)
Available-for-sale:
Municipal bonds	$	103,997	$	1,718	$	(192	)	105,523
Collateralized mortgage obligation	11,204		84		—			11,288
Mortgage-backed securities	163,077		1,013		(440		)	163,650
Total available-for-sale	$	278,278	$	2,815	$	(632	)	$	280,461

At March 31, 2016, mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”) with an estimated par value of $61.6 million and a fair value of $63.8 million were pledged as collateral for the Bank’s three reverse repurchase agreements which totaled $28.5 million and homeowner’s association (“HOA”) reverse repurchase agreements which totaled $16.5 million.

The Company reviews individual securities classified as available-for-sale to determine whether a decline in fair value below the amortized cost basis is other-than-temporary. If it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to contractual terms of the debt security not impaired at acquisition, an OTTI shall be considered to have occurred. If an OTTI occurs, the cost basis of the security will be written down to its fair value as the new cost basis and the write down accounted for as a realized loss. The Company realized OTTI losses of $207,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2016. The Company did not realize any OTTI losses for the three months ended December 31, 2015 and March 31, 2015.

During the three months ended March 31, 2016, December 31, 2015 and March 31, 2015, the Company recognized gross gains on sales of available-for-sale securities in the amount of $762,000, $1,000 and $117,000, respectively. During the three months ended March 31, 2016, December 31, 2015 and March 31, 2015, the Company recognized gross losses on sales of available-for-sale securities in the amount of $9,000, $5,000 and $1,000, respectively. The Company had net proceeds from the sale of available-for-sale securities of $185 million, $677,000 and $7.2 million during the three months ended March 31, 2016, December 31, 2015 and March 31, 2015, respectively.

Table of Contents

The table below shows the number, fair value and gross unrealized holding losses of the Company’s investment securities by investment category and length of time that the securities have been in a continuous loss position.



	March 31, 2016
	Less than 12 months						12 months or Longer						Total
	Number	Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Holding Losses			Number	Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Holding Losses			Number	Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Holding Losses
	(dollars in thousands)
Available-for-sale:
Municipal bonds	12	$	6,251	$	(28	)	—	$	—	$	—		12	$	6,251	$	(28	)
Collateralized mortgage obligation	2	9,318		(9		)	—	—		—			2	9,318		(9		)
Mortgage-backed securities	10	23,289		(140		)	7	22,444		(335		)	17	45,733		(475		)
Total securities available-for-sale	24	$	38,858	$	(177	)	7	$	22,444	$	(335	)	31	$	61,302	$	(512	)



	December 31, 2015
	Less than 12 months						12 months or Longer						Total
	Number	Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Holding Losses			Number	Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Holding Losses			Number	Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Holding Losses
	(dollars in thousands)
Available-for-sale:
Municipal bonds	32	$	15,516	$	(61	)	6	$	3,349	$	(36	)	38	$	18,865	$	(97	)
Collateralized mortgage obligation	5	22,771		(183		)	—	—		—			5	22,771		(183		)
Mortgage-backed securities	34	83,488		(679		)	3	12,935		(432		)	37	96,423		(1,111		)
Total securities available-for-sale	71	121,775		(923		)	9	16,284		(468		)	80	138,059		(1,391		)
Held-to-maturity:
Mortgage-backed securities	1	8,330		(70		)	—	—		—			1	8,330		(70		)
Total securities held-to-maturity	1	8,330		(70		)	—	—		—			1	8,330		(70		)
Total securities	72	$	130,105	$	(993	)	9	$	16,284	$	(468	)	81	$	146,389	$	(1,461	)

Table of Contents



	March 31, 2015
	Less than 12 months						12 months or Longer						Total
	Number	Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Holding Losses			Number	Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Holding Losses			Number	Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Holding Losses
	(dollars in thousands)
Available-for-sale:
Municipal bonds	48	$	20,818	$	(179	)	3	$	1,073	$	(13	)	51	$	21,891	$	(192	)
Collateralized mortgage obligation	1	4,622		—			—	—		—			1	4,622		—
Mortgage-backed securities	9	17,235		(66		)	3	15,111		(374		)	12	32,346		(440		)
Total securities available-for-sale	58	$	42,675	$	(245	)	6	$	16,184	$	(387	)	64	$	58,859	$	(632	)

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of investment securities available for sale at March 31, 2016, by contractual maturity are shown in the table below.



	One Year or Less				More than One Year to Five Years				More than Five Years to Ten Years				More than Ten Years				Total
	Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value
	(dollars in thousands)
Available-for-sale:
Municipal bonds	$	1,422	$	1,423	$	27,576	$	27,886	$	43,199	$	44,398	$	51,287	$	52,175	$	123,484	$	125,882
Collateralized mortgage obligation	—		—		—		—		—		—		23,805		23,866		23,805		23,866
Mortgage-backed securities	—		—		—		—		29,014		29,196		90,925		90,767		119,939		119,963
Total securities available-for-sale	1,422		1,423		27,576		27,886		72,213		73,594		166,017		166,808		267,228		269,711
Held-to-maturity:
Mortgage-backed securities	—		—		—		—		—		—		8,361		8,383		8,361		8,383
Other	—		—		—		—		—		—		1,229		1,229		1,229		1,229
Total securities held-to-maturity	—		—		—		—		—		—		9,590		9,612		9,590		9,612
Total securities	$	1,422	$	1,423	$	27,576	$	27,886	$	72,213	$	73,594	$	175,607	$	176,420	$	276,818	$	279,323

Unrealized gains and losses on investment securities available for sale are recognized in stockholders’ equity as accumulated other comprehensive income or loss. At March 31, 2016, the Company had accumulated other comprehensive income of $2.5 million, or $1.5 million net of tax, compared to accumulated other comprehensive income of $562,000, or $332,000 net of tax, at December 31, 2015.

Table of Contents

FHLB, FRB and other stock

At March 31, 2016, the Company had $14.4 million in Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) stock, $7.9 million in Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (“FRB”) stock, and $3.6 million in other stock, all carried at cost. During the three months ended March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, FHLB did not repurchase any of the Company’s excess FHLB stock through their stock repurchase program. During the three months ended March 31, 2015, FHLB had repurchased $5.9 million of the Company’s excess FHLB stock through their stock repurchase program. The Company evaluates its investments in FHLB and other stock for impairment periodically, including their capital adequacy and overall financial condition. No impairment losses have been recorded through March 31, 2016.

Table of Contents

Note 6 – Loans Held for Investment

The following table sets forth the composition of our loan portfolio in dollar amounts at the dates indicated:



	March 31, 2016			December 31, 2015			March 31, 2015
	(in thousands)
Business loans:
Commercial and industrial	$	491,112		$	309,741		$	276,321
Franchise	371,875			328,925			216,544
Commercial owner occupied (1)	424,289			294,726			279,704
SBA	78,350			62,256			49,855
Warehouse facilities	1,394			143,200			216,554
Real estate loans:
Commercial non-owner occupied	522,080			421,583			452,422
Multi-family	619,485			429,003			397,130
One-to-four family (2)	106,854			80,050			116,735
Construction	218,069			169,748			111,704
Land	18,222			18,340			7,243
Other loans	6,045			5,111			6,641
Total gross loans (3)	2,857,775			2,262,683			2,130,853
Less Loans held for sale, net	7,281			8,565			—
Total gross loans held for investment	2,850,494			2,254,118			2,130,853
Less:
Deferred loan origination costs/(fees) and premiums/(discounts), net	938			197			534
Allowance for loan losses	(18,455		)	(17,317		)	(13,646		)
Loans held for investment, net	$	2,832,977		$	2,236,998		$	2,117,741

______________________________

(1) Majority secured by real estate.

(2) Includes second trust deeds.

(3) Total gross loans for March 31, 2016 are net of the unaccreted mark-to-market discounts on Canyon National Bank (“Canyon National“) loans of $121,000, on Palm Desert National Bank (“Palm Desert National”) loans of $877,000, on First Associations Bank (“FAB”) loans of $4,000, on San Diego Trust Bank (“SDTB”) loans of $105,000, on Independence Bank (“IDPK”) loans of $3.3 million and on Security California Bancorp (“SCAF”) loans of $10.7 million.

From time to time, we may purchase or sell loans in order to manage concentrations, maximize interest income, change risk profiles, improve returns and generate liquidity.

The Company makes residential and commercial loans held for investment to customers located primarily in California. Consequently, the underlying collateral for our loans and a borrower’s ability to repay may be impacted unfavorably by adverse changes in the economy and real estate market in the region.

Under applicable laws and regulations, the Bank may not make secured loans to one borrower in excess of 25% of the Bank’s unimpaired capital plus surplus and likewise in excess of 15% for unsecured loans. These loans-to-one borrower limitations result in a dollar limitation of $125.2 million for secured loans and $75.0 million for unsecured loans at March 31, 2016. At March 31, 2016, the Bank’s largest aggregate outstanding balance of loans to one borrower was $26.4 million of secured credit.

Table of Contents

Purchased Credit Impaired

The following table provides a summary of the Company’s investment in purchased credit impaired loans, acquired from Canyon National Bank, IDPK and SCAF as of the period indicated:



	March 31, 2016
	Canyon National		IDPK		SCAF		Total
	(in thousands)
Business loans:
Commercial and industrial	$	89	$	183	$	4,530	$	4,802
Commercial owner occupied	523		332		1,138		1,993
Real estate loans:
Commercial non-owner occupied	894		648		—		1,542
One-to-four family	—		—		817		817
Other loans	—		—		441		441
Total purchase credit impaired	$	1,506	$	1,163	$	6,926	$	9,595

On the acquisition date, the amount by which the undiscounted expected cash flows of the purchased credit impaired loans exceed the estimated fair value of the loan is the “accretable yield.” The accretable yield is measured at each financial reporting date and represents the difference between the remaining undiscounted expected cash flows and the current carrying value of the purchased credit impaired loan. At March 31, 2016, the Company had $9.6 million of purchased credit impaired loans, of which $1.8 million were placed on nonaccrual status.

The following table summarizes the accretable yield on the purchased credit impaired loans for the three months ended March 31, 2016:



	Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2016
	Canyon National			IDPK			SCAF			Total
	(in thousands)
Balance at the beginning of period	$	1,130		$	1,596		$	—		$	2,726
Accretable yield at acquisition	—			—			788			788
Accretion	(49		)	(4		)	(76		)	(129		)
Disposals and other	—			(323		)	—			(323		)
Change in accretable yield	—			192			—			192
Balance at the end of period	1,081			1,461			712			3,254

Table of Contents

Impaired Loans

The following tables provide a summary of the Company’s investment in impaired loans as of the period indicated:



					Impaired Loans
	Contractual Unpaid Principal Balance		Recorded Investment		With Specific Allowance		Without Specific Allowance		Specific Allowance for Impaired Loans		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
	(in thousands)
March 31, 2016
Business loans:
Commercial and industrial	$	373	$	306	$	—	$	306	$	—	$	308	$	5
Franchise	2,394		1,630		1,461		169		731		1,629		27
Commercial owner occupied	870		507		—		507		—		518		9
SBA	414		69		—		69		—		23		—
Real estate loans:
Commercial non-owner occupied	—		—		—		—		—		143		2
One-to-four family	556		523		—		523		—		251		5
Land	37		19		—		19		—		20		1
Totals	$	4,644	$	3,054	$	1,461	$	1,593	$	731	$	2,892	$	49



					Impaired Loans
	Contractual Unpaid Principal Balance		Recorded Investment		With Specific Allowance		Without Specific Allowance		Specific Allowance for Impaired Loans		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
	(in thousands)
December 31, 2015
Business loans:
Commercial and industrial	$	578	$	313	$	—	$	313	$	—	$	90	$	29
Franchise	2,394		1,630		1,461		169		731		1,386		3
Commercial owner occupied	883		536		—		536		—		415		67
Real estate loans:
Commercial non-owner occupied	329		214		—		214		—		430		19
One-to-four family	98		70		—		70		—		204		5
Land	37		21		—		21		—		13		—
Totals	$	4,319	$	2,784	$	1,461	$	1,323	$	731	$	2,543	$	123

Table of Contents



					Impaired Loans
	Contractual Unpaid Principal Balance		Recorded Investment		With Specific Allowance		Without Specific Allowance		Specific Allowance for Impaired Loans		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
	(in thousands)
March 31, 2015
Business loans:
Franchise	$	2,225	$	1,853	$	—	$	1,853	$	—	$	618	$	—
Commercial owner occupied	438		379		—		379		—		382		7
Real estate loans:
Commercial non-owner occupied	698		458		—		458		—		465		12
One-to-four family	254		232		—		232		—		234		5
Totals	$	3,615	$	2,922	$	—	$	2,922	$	—	$	1,699	$	24

The Company considers a loan to be impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement or it is determined that the likelihood of the Company receiving all scheduled payments, including interest, when due is remote. The Company has no commitments to lend additional funds to debtors whose loans have been impaired.

The Company reviews loans for impairment when the loan is classified as substandard or worse, delinquent 90 days, or determined by management to be collateral dependent, or when the borrower files bankruptcy or is granted a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”). Measurement of impairment is based on the loan’s expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, measured by reference to an observable market value, if one exists, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is deemed collateral dependent. All loans are generally charged-off at such time the loan is classified as a loss. Valuation allowances are determined on a loan-by-loan basis or by aggregating loans with similar risk characteristics.

The following table provides additional detail on the components of impaired loans at the period end indicated:



	March 31, 2016		December 31, 2015		March 31, 2015
	(in thousands)
Nonaccruing loans	$	3,054	$	2,736	$	2,742
Accruing loans	—		48		180
Total impaired loans	$	3,054	$	2,784	$	2,922

When loans are placed on nonaccrual status all accrued interest is reversed from earnings. Payments received on nonaccrual loans are generally applied as a reduction to the loan principal balance. If the likelihood of further loss is remote, the Company will recognize interest on a cash basis only. Loans may be returned to accruing status if the Company believes that all remaining principal and interest is fully collectible and there has been at least three months of sustained repayment performance since the loan was placed on nonaccrual.

The Company does not accrue interest on loans 90 days or more past due or when, in the opinion of management, there is reasonable doubt as to the collection of interest. The Company had impaired loans on nonaccrual status of $3.1 million at March 31, 2016, $2.7 million at December 31, 2015, and $2.7 million at

Table of Contents

March 31, 2015. The Company had no loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing at March 31, 2016, December 31, 2015 or March 31, 2015.

The Company had no TDRs at March 31, 2016, December 31, 2015, or March 31, 2015. In addition, the Company had no foreclosed residential real estate property or a recorded investment in consumer mortgage loans collateralized by residential real estate property for which formal foreclosure proceedings were in process as of March 31, 2016.

Concentration of Credit Risk

As of March 31, 2016, the Company’s loan portfolio was collateralized by various forms of real estate and business assets located predominately in California. The Company’s loan portfolio contains concentrations of credit in multi-family real estate, commercial non-owner occupied real estate and commercial owner occupied business loans. The Bank maintains policies approved by the Bank’s Board of Directors (the “Bank Board”) that address these concentrations and continues to diversify its loan portfolio through loan originations, purchases and sales to meet approved concentration levels. While management believes that the collateral presently securing these loans is adequate, there can be no assurances that a significant deterioration in the California real estate market or economy would not expose the Company to significantly greater credit risk.

Credit Quality and Credit Risk Management

The Company’s credit quality is maintained and credit risk managed in two distinct areas. The first is the loan origination process, wherein the Bank underwrites credit quality and chooses which risks it is willing to accept. The second is in the ongoing oversight of the loan portfolio, where existing credit risk is measured and monitored, and where performance issues are dealt with in a timely and comprehensive fashion.

The Company maintains a comprehensive credit policy which sets forth minimum and maximum tolerances for key elements of loan risk. The policy identifies and sets forth specific guidelines for analyzing each of the loan products the Company offers from both an individual and portfolio wide basis. The credit policy is reviewed annually by the Bank Board. The Bank’s seasoned underwriters ensure all key risk factors are analyzed with nearly all underwriting including a comprehensive global cash flow analysis of the prospective borrowers. The credit approval process mandates multiple-signature approval by the management credit committee for every loan that requires any subjective credit analysis.

Credit risk is managed within the loan portfolio by the Company’s Portfolio Management department based on a comprehensive credit and investment review policy. This policy requires a program of financial data collection and analysis, comprehensive loan reviews, property and/or business inspections and monitoring of portfolio concentrations and trends. The Portfolio Management department also monitors asset-based lines of credit, loan covenants and other conditions associated with the Company’s business loans as a means to help identify potential credit risk. Individual loans, excluding the homogeneous loan portfolio, are reviewed at least biennially, and in most cases more often, including the assignment of a risk grade.

Risk grades are based on a six-grade Pass scale, along with Special Mention, Substandard, Doubtful and Loss classifications as such classifications are defined by the regulatory agencies. The assignment of risk grades allows the Company to, among other things, identify the risk associated with each credit in the portfolio, and to provide a basis for estimating credit losses inherent in the portfolio. Risk grades are reviewed regularly by the Company’s Credit and Portfolio Review committee, and are reviewed annually by an independent third-party, as well as by regulatory agencies during scheduled examinations.

Table of Contents

The following provides brief definitions for risk grades assigned to loans in the portfolio:


•	Pass classifications represent assets with a level of credit quality which contain no well-defined deficiency or weakness.


•	Special Mention assets do not currently expose the Bank to a sufficient risk to warrant classification in one of the adverse categories, but possess correctable deficiencies or potential weaknesses deserving management’s close attention.


•	Substandard assets are inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. These assets are characterized by the distinct possibility that the Bank will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. OREO acquired from foreclosure is also classified as substandard.


•	Doubtful credits have all the weaknesses inherent in substandard credits, with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable.


•	Loss assets are those that are considered uncollectible and of such little value that their continuance as assets is not warranted. Amounts classified as loss are promptly charged off.

The Portfolio Management department also manages loan performance risks, collections, workouts, bankruptcies and foreclosures. Loan performance risks are mitigated by our portfolio managers acting promptly and assertively to address problem credits when they are identified. Collection efforts are commenced immediately upon non-payment, and the portfolio managers seek to promptly determine the appropriate steps to minimize the Company’s risk of loss. When foreclosure will maximize the Company’s recovery for a non-performing loan, the portfolio managers will take appropriate action to initiate the foreclosure process.

When a loan is graded as special mention or substandard or doubtful, the Company obtains an updated valuation of the underlying collateral. If the credit in question is also identified as impaired, a valuation allowance, if necessary, is established against such loan or a loss is recognized by a charge to the allowance for loan losses (“ALLL”) if management believes that the full amount of the Company’s recorded investment in the loan is no longer collectable. The Company typically continues to obtain or confirm updated valuations of underlying collateral for special mention and classified loans on an annual basis in order to have the most current indication of fair value. Once a loan is identified as impaired, an analysis of the underlying collateral is performed at least quarterly, and corresponding changes in any related valuation allowance are made or balances deemed to be fully uncollectable are charged-off.

Table of Contents

The following tables stratify the loan portfolio by the Company’s internal risk grading system as well as certain other information concerning the credit quality of the loan portfolio as of the periods indicated:



	Credit Risk Grades
	Pass		Special Mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Total Gross Loans
March 31, 2016	(in thousands)
Business loans:
Commercial and industrial	$	481,770	$	2,977	$	6,365	$	—	$	491,112
Franchise	370,245		—		169		1,461		371,875
Commercial owner occupied	413,627		2,029		8,633		—		424,289
SBA	78,280		—		70		—		78,350
Warehouse facilities	1,394		—		—		—		1,394
Real estate loans:									0
Commercial non-owner occupied	520,248		—		1,832		—		522,080
Multi-family	616,620		—		2,865		—		619,485
One-to-four family	104,608		—		2,246		—		106,854
Construction	218,069		—		—		—		218,069
Land	18,203		—		19		—		18,222
Other loans	5,604		—		441		—		6,045
Totals	$	2,828,668	$	5,006	$	22,640	$	1,461	$	2,857,775



	Credit Risk Grades
	Pass		Special Mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Total Gross Loans
December 31, 2015	(in thousands)
Business loans:
Commercial and industrial	$	306,513	$	73	$	3,155	$	—	$	309,741
Franchise	327,295		—		169		1,461		328,925
Commercial owner occupied	286,270		627		7,829		—		294,726
SBA	62,256		—		—		—		62,256
Warehouse facilities	143,200		—		—		—		143,200
Real estate loans:									—
Commercial non-owner occupied	418,917		—		2,666		—		421,583
Multi-family	425,616		—		3,387		—		429,003
One-to-four family	78,997		—		1,053		—		80,050
Construction	169,748		—		—		—		169,748
Land	18,319		—		21		—		18,340
Other loans	5,111		—		—		—		5,111
Totals	$	2,242,242	$	700	$	18,280	$	1,461	$	2,262,683

Table of Contents



	Credit Risk Grades
	Pass		Special Mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Total Gross Loans
March 31, 2015	(in thousands)
Business loans:
Commercial and industrial	$	268,285	$	1,250	$	6,786	$	—	$	276,321
Franchise	214,690		—		1,854		—		216,544
Commercial owner occupied	268,038		—		11,666		—		279,704
SBA	49,855		—		—		—		49,855
Warehouse facilities	216,554		—		—		—		216,554
Real estate loans:
Commercial non-owner occupied	446,900		—		5,522		—		452,422
Multi-family	391,690		1,954		3,486		—		397,130
One-to-four family	115,780		—		955		—		116,735
Construction	111,469		—		235		—		111,704
Land	7,243		—		—		—		7,243
Other loans	6,641		—		—		—		6,641
Totals	$	2,097,145	$	3,204	$	30,504	$	—	$	2,130,853

The following tables set forth delinquencies in the Company’s loan portfolio at the dates indicated:



			Days Past Due								Non-
	Current		30-59		60-89		90+		Total		Accruing
March 31, 2016	(in thousands)
Business loans:
Commercial and industrial	$	490,796	$	—	$	—	$	316	$	491,112	$	498
Franchise	370,245		—		—		1,630		371,875		1,630
Commercial owner occupied	424,289		—		—		—		424,289		839
SBA	78,104		246		—		—		78,350		69
Warehouse facilities	1,394		—		—		—		1,394		—
Real estate loans:
Commercial non-owner occupied	522,080		—		—		—		522,080		428
Multi-family	619,485		—		—		—		619,485		—
One-to-four family	105,619		1		—		1,234		106,854		1,340
Construction	218,069		—		—		—		218,069		—
Land	18,203		—		—		19		18,222		19
Other loans	6,045		—		—		—		6,045		—
Totals	$	2,854,329	$	247	$	—	$	3,199	$	2,857,775	$	4,823

Table of Contents



			Days Past Due								Non-
	Current		30-59		60-89		90+		Total		Accruing
December 31, 2015	(in thousands)
Business loans:
Commercial and industrial	$	309,464	$	20	$	—	$	257	$	309,741	$	463
Franchise	327,295		—		—		1,630		328,925		1,630
Commercial owner occupied	294,371		—		355		—		294,726		536
SBA	62,256		—		—		—		62,256		—
Warehouse facilities	143,200		—		—		—		143,200		—
Real estate loans:
Commercial non-owner occupied	421,369		214		—		—		421,583		1,164
Multi-family	429,003		—		—		—		429,003		—
One-to-four family	79,915		89		—		46		80,050		155
Construction	169,748		—		—		—		169,748		—
Land	18,319		—		—		21		18,340		21
Other loans	5,111		—		—		—		5,111		1
Totals	$	2,260,051	$	323	$	355	$	1,954	$	2,262,683	$	3,970



			Days Past Due								Non-
	Current		30-59		60-89		90+		Total		Accruing
March 31, 2015	(in thousands)
Business loans:
Commercial and industrial	$	275,850	$	146	$	—	$	325	$	276,321	$	601
Franchise	214,691		—		—		1,853		216,544		1,854
Commercial owner occupied	278,953		349		375		27		279,704		527
SBA	49,855		—		—		—		49,855		—
Warehouse facilities	216,554		—		—		—		216,554		—
Real estate loans:
Commercial non-owner occupied	452,422		—		—		—		452,422		1,602
Multi-family	397,130		—		—		—		397,130		—
One-to-four family	116,533		149		—		53		116,735		79
Construction	111,704		—		—		—		111,704		—
Land	7,243		—		—		—		7,243		—
Other loans	6,640		1		—		—		6,641		—
Totals	$	2,127,575	$	645	$	375	$	2,258	$	2,130,853	$	4,663

Note 7 – Allowance for Loan Losses

The Company’s ALLL covers estimated credit losses on individually evaluated loans that are determined to be impaired as well as estimated credit losses inherent in the remainder of the loan portfolio. The ALLL is prepared using the information provided by the Company’s credit review process together with data from peer institutions and economic information gathered from published sources.

The loan portfolio is segmented into groups of loans with similar risk characteristics. Each segment possesses varying degrees of risk based on, among other things, the type of loan, the type of collateral, and the sensitivity of the borrower or industry to changes in external factors such as economic conditions. An estimated loss

Table of Contents

rate calculated using the Company’s actual historical loss rates adjusted for current portfolio trends, economic conditions, and other relevant internal and external factors, is applied to each group’s aggregate loan balances.

The Company’s base ALLL factors are determined by management using the Bank’s annualized actual trailing charge-off data over intervals ranging from 84, 72, 36, 24, 12 and 6 months. Adjustments to those base factors are made for relevant internal and external factors. Those factors may include:


•	Changes in national, regional and local economic conditions, including trends in real estate values and the interest rate environment,


•	Changes in the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, including new types of lending,


•	Changes in volume and severity of past due loans, the volume of nonaccrual loans, and the volume and severity of adversely classified or graded loans, and


•	The existence and effect of concentrations of credit, and changes in the level of such concentrations.

The resulting total ALLL factor is compared for reasonableness against the 10-year average, 15-year average, and trailing 12 month total charge-off data for all Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) insured commercial banks and savings institutions based in California. This factor is applied to balances graded pass-1through pass-5. For loans risk graded as watch or worse, progressively higher potential loss factors are applied based on management’s judgment, taking into consideration the specific characteristics of the Bank’s portfolio and analysis of results from a select group of the Company’s peers.

Table of Contents

The following tables summarize the allocation of the ALLL, as well as the activity in the ALLL attributed to various segments in the loan portfolio as of and for the three months ended for the periods indicated:



	Commercial and industrial			Franchise			Commercial owner occupied			SBA			Warehouse Facilities			Commercial non-owner occupied			Multi-family			One-to-four family			Construction			Land			Other loans			Total
	(dollars in thousands)
Balance, December 31, 2015	$	3,449		$	3,124		$	1,870		$	1,500		$	759		$	2,048		$	1,583		$	698		$	2,030		$	233		$	23		$	17,317
Charge-offs	—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—
Recoveries	14			—			—			3			—			—			—			1			—			—			—			18
Provisions for (reduction in) loan losses	(440		)	444			95			125			(752		)	(151		)	1,349			6			474			(29		)	(1		)	1,120
Balance, March 31, 2016	$	3,023		$	3,568		$	1,965		$	1,628		$	7		$	1,897		$	2,932		$	705		$	2,504		$	204		$	22		$	18,455

Amount of allowance attributed to:
Specifically evaluated impaired loans	$	—		$	731		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	731
General portfolio allocation	3,023			2,837			1,965			1,628			7			1,897			2,932			705			2,504			204			22			17,724
Loans individually evaluated for impairment	306			1,630			507			69			—			—			—			523			—			19			—			3,054
Specific reserves to total loans individually evaluated for impairment	—		%	44.85		%	—		%	—		%	—		%	—		%	—		%	—		%	—		%	—		%	—		%	23.94		%
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment	$	490,806		$	370,245		$	423,782		$	78,281		$	1,394		$	522,080		$	619,485		$	106,331		$	218,069		$	18,203		$	6,045		$	2,854,721
General reserves to total loans collectively evaluated for impairment	0.62		%	0.77		%	0.46		%	2.08		%	0.50		%	0.36		%	0.47		%	0.66		%	1.15		%	1.12		%	0.36		%	0.62		%
Total gross loans	$	491,112		$	371,875		$	424,289		$	78,350		$	1,394		$	522,080		$	619,485		$	106,854		$	218,069		$	18,222		$	6,045		$	2,857,775
Total allowance to gross loans	0.62		%	0.96		%	0.46		%	2.08		%	0.50		%	0.36		%	0.47		%	0.66		%	1.15		%	1.12		%	0.36		%	0.65		%

Table of Contents



	Commercial and industrial			Franchise			Commercial owner occupied			SBA			Warehouse Facilities			Commercial non-owner occupied			Multi-family			One-to-four family			Construction			Land			Other loans			Total
	(dollars in thousands)
Balance, September 30, 2015	$	3,339		$	2,224		$	1,904		$	1,463		$	804		$	2,121		$	1,680		$	718		$	1,701		$	171		$	20		$	16,145
Charge-offs	(412		)	—			—			—			—			(116		)	—			(16		)	—			—			—			(544		)
Recoveries	12			—			—			4			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			16
Provisions for (reduction in) loan losses	510			900			(34		)	33			(45		)	43			(97		)	(4		)	329			62			3			1,700
Balance, December 31, 2015	$	3,449		$	3,124		$	1,870		$	1,500		$	759		$	2,048		$	1,583		$	698		$	2,030		$	233		$	23		$	17,317

Amount of allowance attributed to:
Specifically evaluated impaired loans	$	—		$	731		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	731
General portfolio allocation	3,449			2,393			1,870			1,500			759			2,048			1,583			698			2,030			233			23			16,586
Loans individually evaluated for impairment	313			1,630			536			—			—			214			—			70			—			21			1			2,785
Specific reserves to total loans individually evaluated for impairment	—		%	44.85		%	—		%	—		%	—		%	—		%	—		%	—		%	—		%	—		%	—		%	26.25		%
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment	$	309,428		$	327,295		$	294,190		$	62,256		$	143,200		$	421,369		$	429,003		$	79,980		$	169,748		$	18,319		$	5,110		$	2,259,898
General reserves to total loans collectively evaluated for impairment	1.11		%	0.73		%	0.64		%	2.41		%	0.53		%	0.49		%	0.37		%	0.87		%	1.20		%	1.27		%	0.45		%	0.73		%
Total gross loans	$	309,741		$	328,925		$	294,726		$	62,256		$	143,200		$	421,583		$	429,003		$	80,050		$	169,748		$	18,340		$	5,111		$	2,262,683
Total allowance to gross loans	1.11		%	0.95		%	0.63		%	2.41		%	0.53		%	0.49		%	0.37		%	0.87		%	1.20		%	1.27		%	0.45		%	0.77		%

Table of Contents



	Commercial and industrial			Franchise			Commercial owner occupied			SBA			Warehouse Facilities			Commercial non-owner occupied			Multi-family			One-to-four family			Construction			Land			Other loans			Total
	(dollars in thousands)
Balance, December 31, 2014	$	2,646		$	1,554		$	1,757		$	568		$	546		$	2,007		$	1,060		$	842		$	1,088		$	108		$	24		$	12,200
Charge-offs	(24		)	(372		)	—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			(396		)
Recoveries	12			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			12
Provisions for (reduction in) loan losses	809			558			(155		)	(21		)	343			124			243			(168		)	122			(30		)	5			1,830
Balance, March 31, 2015	$	3,443		$	1,740		$	1,602		$	547		$	889		$	2,131		$	1,303		$	674		$	1,210		$	78		$	29		$	13,646

Amount of allowance attributed to:
Specifically evaluated impaired loans	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—
General portfolio allocation	3,443			1,740			1,602			547			889			2,131			1,303			674			1,210			78			29			13,646
Loans individually evaluated for impairment	—			1,853			379			—			—			458			—			232			—			—			—			2,922
Specific reserves to total loans individually evaluated for impairment	—		%	—		%	—		%	—		%	—		%	—		%	—		%	—		%	—		%	—		%	—		%	—		%
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment	$	276,321		$	214,691		$	279,325		$	49,855		$	216,554		$	451,964		$	397,130		$	116,503		$	111,704		$	7,243		$	6,641		$	2,127,931
General reserves to total loans collectively evaluated for impairment	1.25		%	0.81		%	0.57		%	1.10		%	0.41		%	0.47		%	0.33		%	0.58		%	1.08		%	1.08		%	0.44		%	0.64		%
Total gross loans	$	276,321		$	216,544		$	279,704		$	49,855		$	216,554		$	452,422		$	397,130		$	116,735		$	111,704		$	7,243		$	6,641		$	2,130,853
Total allowance to gross loans	1.25		%	0.80		%	0.57		%	1.10		%	0.41		%	0.47		%	0.33		%	0.58		%	1.08		%	1.08		%	0.44		%	0.64		%

Table of Contents

Note 8 – Subordinated Debentures

In August 2014, the Corporation issued $60 million in aggregate principal amount of 5.75% Subordinated Notes Due 2024 (the “Notes”) in a private placement transaction to institutional accredited investors (the “Private Placement”). The Corporation contributed $50 million of net proceeds from the Private Placement to the Bank to support general corporate purposes. The Notes bear interest at an annual fixed rate of 5.75%, and the first interest payment on the Notes occurred on March 3, 2015, and interest payments have since been paid, and will continue to be payable semiannually each March 3 and September 3 until September 3, 2024. The Notes can only be redeemed, partially or in whole, prior to the maturity date if the notes do not constitute Tier 2 Capital (for purposes of capital adequacy guidelines of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve). Outstanding principal and accrued and unpaid interest are due upon early redemption.

In connection with the Private Placement, the Corporation obtained ratings from Kroll Bond Rating Agency (“KBRA”). KBRA assigned investment grade ratings of BBB+ and BBB for the Corporation’s senior unsecured debt and subordinated debt, respectively, and a senior deposit rating of A- for the Bank. These ratings were affirmed by KBRA on October 23, 2015.

In March 2004, the Corporation issued $10.3 million of Floating Rate Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debentures (the “Subordinated Debentures”) to PPBI Trust I, which funded the payment of $10 million of Floating Rate Trust Preferred Securities (“Trust Preferred Securities”) issued by PPBI Trust I in March 2004. The net proceeds from the offering of Trust Preferred Securities were contributed as capital to the Bank to support further growth. Interest is payable quarterly on the Subordinated Debentures at three-month LIBOR plus 2.75% per annum, for an effective rate of 3.37% per annum as of March 31, 2016.

The Corporation is not allowed to consolidate PPBI Trust I into the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The resulting effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements is to report only the Subordinated Debentures as a component of the Company’s liabilities.

Note 9 – Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net income or loss available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period, excluding common shares in treasury. Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted from the issuance of common stock that would then share in earnings and excludes common shares in treasury. Stock options exercisable for shares of common stock are excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share if they are anti-dilutive due to their exercise price exceeding the average market price during the period.

The impact of stock options which are anti-dilutive are excluded from the computations of diluted earnings per share. The dilutive impact of these securities could be included in future computations of diluted earnings per share if the market price of the common stock increases. The following table sets forth the weighted average number of stock options excluded for the periods indicated:



	Three Months Ended
	March 31,	December 31,	March 31,
	2016	2015	2015

Weighted average stock options excluded	86,044	—	412,748

Table of Contents

The following tables set forth the Company’s unaudited earnings per share calculations for the periods indicated:



	Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2016					December 31, 2015					March 31, 2015
	Net Income		Shares	Per Share Amount		Net Income		Shares	Per Share Amount		Net Income		Shares	Per Share Amount
	(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Net income	$	8,554				$	8,065				$	1,789
Basic income available to common stockholders	8,554		25,555,654	$	0.33	8,065		21,510,746	$	0.38	1,789		20,091,924	$	0.09
Effect of dilutive stock option grants and warrants	—		396,530			—		430,289			—		290,908
Diluted income available to common stockholders plus assumed conversions	$	8,554	25,952,184	$	0.33	8,065		21,941,035	$	0.37	$	1,789	20,382,832	$	0.09

Note 10 – Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The fair value of an asset or liability is the price that would be received to sell that asset or paid to transfer that liability in an orderly transaction occurring in the principal market (or most advantageous market in the absence of a principal market) for such asset or liability. In estimating fair value, the Company utilizes valuation techniques that are consistent with the market approach, the income approach, and/or the cost approach. Such valuation techniques are consistently applied. Inputs to valuation techniques include the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. ASC Topic 825 requires disclosure of the fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities, including both those financial assets and financial liabilities that are not measured and reported at fair value on a recurring basis and a non-recurring basis. The methodologies for estimating the fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities that are measured at fair value, and for estimating the fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities not recorded at fair value, are discussed below.

In accordance with accounting guidance, the Company groups its financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value in three levels, based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described as follows:

Level 1 - Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.

Level 2 - Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These might include quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (such as interest rates, prepayment speeds, volatilities, etc.) or model-based valuation techniques where all significant assumptions are observable, either directly or indirectly, in the market.

Table of Contents

Level 3 - Valuation is generated from model-based techniques where one or more significant inputs are not observable, either directly or indirectly, in the market. These unobservable assumptions reflect the Company’s own estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Valuation techniques may include use of matrix pricing, discounted cash flow models, and similar techniques.

Because no market exists for a significant portion of the Company’s financial instruments, fair value estimates are based on judgments regarding current economic conditions, risk characteristics of various financial instruments, and other factors. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and therefore cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the fair values presented. Management uses its best judgment in estimating the fair value of the Company’s financial instruments; however, there are inherent limitations in any estimation technique. Therefore, for substantially all financial instruments, the fair value estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Company could have realized in a sales transaction at March 31, 2016, December 31, 2015 and March 31, 2015.

A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Management maximizes the use of observable inputs and attempts to minimize the use of unobservable inputs when determining fair value measurements. The following is a description of both the general and specific valuation methodologies used for certain instruments measured at fair value, as well as the general classification of these instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy.

Cash and due from banks – The carrying amounts of cash and short-term instruments approximate fair value due to the liquidity of these instruments.

Securities Available for Sale – AFS securities are generally valued based upon quotes obtained from an independent third-party pricing service, which uses evaluated pricing applications and model processes. Observable market inputs, such as, benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads, two-sided markets, benchmark securities, bids, offers and reference data are considered as part of the evaluation. The inputs are related directly to the security being evaluated, or indirectly to a similarly situated security. Market assumptions and market data are utilized in the valuation models. The Company reviews the market prices provided by the third-party pricing service for reasonableness based on the Company’s understanding of the market place and credit issues related to the securities. The Company has not made any adjustments to the market quotes provided by them and, accordingly, the Company categorized its investment portfolio within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

FHLB, FRB, Other Stock – The carrying value approximates the fair value based upon the redemption provisions of the stock.

Loans Held for Investment— The fair value of loans, other than loans on nonaccrual status, was estimated by discounting the remaining contractual cash flows using the estimated current rate at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit risk characteristics and for the same remaining maturities, reduced by deferred net loan origination fees and the allocable portion of the allowance for loan losses. Accordingly, in determining the estimated current rate for discounting purposes, no adjustment has been made for any change in borrowers’ credit risks since the origination of such loans. Rather, the allocable portion of the allowance for loan losses is considered to provide for such changes in estimating fair value. As a result, this fair value is not necessarily the value which would be derived using an exit price. These loans are included within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

Impaired loans and OREO – Impaired loans and OREO assets are recorded at the fair value less estimated costs to sell at the time of foreclosure. The fair value of impaired loans and OREO assets are generally based on recent real estate appraisals adjusted for estimated selling costs. These appraisals may utilize a single valuation approach or a combination of approaches including comparable sales and the income approach. Adjustments are routinely made in the appraisal process by the appraisers to adjust for differences between the

Table of Contents

comparable sales and income data available. Such adjustments are typically significant and result in a Level 3 classification of the inputs for determining fair value.

Deposit Accounts and Short-term Borrowings — The amounts payable to depositors for demand, savings, and money market accounts, and short-term borrowings are considered to approximate fair value. The fair value of fixed-maturity certificates of deposit is estimated using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities using a discounted cash flow calculation. Interest-bearing deposits and borrowings are included within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

Term FHLB Advances and Other Long-term Borrowings— The fair value of long term borrowings is determined using rates currently available for similar borrowings with similar credit risk and for the remaining maturities and are classified as Level 2.

Subordinated Debentures – The fair value of subordinated debentures is estimated by discounting the balance by the current three-month LIBOR rate plus the current market spread. The fair value is determined based on the maturity date as the Company does not currently have intentions to call the debenture and is classified as Level 2.

Estimated fair values are disclosed for financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate fair value. These estimates are made at a specific point in time based on relevant market data and information about the financial instruments. These estimates do not reflect any premium or discount that could result from offering the Company’s entire holdings of a particular financial instrument for sale at one time, nor do they attempt to estimate the value of anticipated future business related to the instruments. In addition, the tax ramifications related to the realization of unrealized gains and losses can have a significant effect on fair value estimates and have not been considered in any of these estimates.

The fair value estimates presented herein are based on pertinent information available to management as of the periods indicated.



	At March 31, 2016
	Carrying Amount		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Estimated Fair Value
	(in thousands)
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents and interest bearing deposits with financial institutions	$	193,514	$	193,514	$	—	$	—	$	193,514
Investments held to maturity	9,590		—		9,590		—		9,590
Investment securities available for sale	269,711		—		269,711		—		269,711
FHLB, FRB, and other stock	25,853		—		25,853		—		25,853
Loans held for sale	7,281		—		8,082		—
Loans held for investment	2,832,977		—		—		2,849,797		2,849,797
Accrued interest receivable	11,862		11,862		—		—		11,862

Liabilities:
Deposit accounts	2,906,264		2,335,497		585,822		—		2,921,319
FHLB advances	80,000		—		80,033		—		80,033
Other borrowings	44,956		—		45,764		—		45,764
Subordinated debentures	70,310		—		68,093		—		68,093
Accrued interest payable	232		232		—		—		232

Table of Contents



	At December 31, 2015
	Carrying Amount		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Estimated Fair Value
	(in thousands)
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	78,417	$	78,417	$	—	$	—	$	78,417
Investment securities available for sale	280,273		—		280,273		—		280,273
FHLB, FRB, and other stock	22,292				22,292		—		22,292
Loans held for sale	8,565		—		9,507		—		9,507
Loans held for investment	2,236,998		—		—		2,244,936		2,244,936
Accrued interest receivable	9,315		9,315		—		—		9,315

Liabilities:
Deposit accounts	2,195,123		1,674,148		521,291		—		2,195,439
FHLB advances	148,000		—		148,036		—		148,036
Other borrowings	48,125		—		49,156		—		49,156
Subordinated debentures	70,310		—		68,675		—		68,675
Accrued interest payable	206		206		—		—		206



	At March 31, 2015
	Carrying Amount		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Estimated Fair Value
	(in thousands)
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	178,371	$	178,371	$	—	$	—	$	178,371
Investment securities available for sale	280,461		—		280,461		—		280,461
FHLB, FRB, and other stock	30,586		30,586		—		—		30,586
Loans held for investment	2,117,741		—		—		2,205,161		2,205,161
Accrued interest receivable	8,769		8,769		—		—		8,769

Liabilities:
Deposit accounts	2,043,166		1,576,056		479,204		—		2,055,260
FHLB advances	300,000		300,031		—		—		300,031
Other borrowings	43,434		—		45,084		—		45,084
Subordinated debentures	70,310		—		69,501		—		69,501
Accrued interest payable	177		177		—		—		177

A loan is considered impaired when it is probable that payment of interest and principal will not be made in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impairment is measured based on the fair value of the underlying collateral or the discounted expected future cash flows. The Company measures impairment on all non-accrual loans for which it has reduced the principal balance to the value of the underlying collateral less the anticipated selling cost. As such, the Company records impaired loans as Level 3. At March 31, 2016, substantially all the Company’s impaired loans were evaluated based on the fair value of their underlying collateral based upon the most recent appraisal available to management.

Table of Contents

The Company’s valuation methodologies may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. While management believes the Company’s valuation methodologies are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different estimate of fair value at the reporting date.

The following fair value hierarchy table presents information about the Company’s financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis at the dates indicated:



	March 31, 2016
	Fair Value Measurement Using
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Securities at Fair Value
	(in thousands)
Available for sale:
Municipal bonds	$	—	$	125,882	$	—	$	125,882
Collateralized mortgage obligation	$	—	$	23,866	$	—	$	23,866
Mortgage-backed securities	—		119,963		—		119,963
Total securities available for sale	$	—	$	269,711	$	—	$	269,711



	March 31, 2015
	Fair Value Measurement Using
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Securities at Fair Value
	(in thousands)
Available for sale:
Municipal bonds	$	—	$	105,523	$	—	105,523
Collateralized mortgage obligation	$	—	$	11,288	$	—	11,288
Mortgage-backed securities	—		163,650		—		163,650
Total securities available for sale	$	—	$	280,461	$	—	$	280,461

The fair value of impaired loans was determined using Level 3 assumptions, and represents impaired loan balances for which a specific reserve has been established or on which a write down has been taken. Generally, the Company obtains third party appraisals (or property evaluations) and/or collateral audits in conjunction with internal analysis based on historical experience on its impaired loans and other real estate owned to determine fair value. In determining the net realizable value of the underlying collateral for impaired loans, the Company will then discount the valuation to cover both market price fluctuations and selling costs the Company expected would be incurred in the event of foreclosure. In addition to the discounts taken, the Company’s calculation of net realizable value considered any other senior liens in place on the underlying collateral.

Table of Contents

The following table provides a summary of the financial instruments the Company measures at fair value on a non-recurring basis as of the periods indicated:



	March 31, 2016
	Fair Value Measurement Using
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Assets at Fair Value
	(in thousands)
Assets
Collateral dependent impaired loans	$	—	$	—	$	1,593	$	1,593
Other real estate owned	—		—		1,161		1,161
Total assets	$	—	$	—	$	2,754	$	2,754



	March 31, 2015
	Fair Value Measurement Using
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Assets at Fair Value
	(in thousands)
Assets
Collateral dependent impaired loans	$	—	$	—	$	2,742	$	2,742
Other real estate owned	—		—		997		997
Total assets	$	—	$	—	$	3,739	$	3,739

Table of Contents

The following table presents quantitative information about Level 3 of fair value measurements for financial instruments measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis for the periods indicated:



	March 31, 2016
				Range
	Fair Value		Valuation Techniques	Rate	Maturity (years)	Unobservable Inputs
Collateral dependent impaired loans:
Business loans:
Commercial and industrial	$	306	Collateral valuation	6.25 - 7.50%	2 - 6	0 - 10%
Franchise	169		Collateral valuation	5.70 - 6.70%	8	0 - 10%
Commercial owner occupied	507		Collateral valuation	6.75 - 7.75%	1 - 10	0 - 10%
SBA	69		Collateral valuation	0.06	15	0 - 10%
Real estate loans:
Commercial non-owner occupied	—		Collateral valuation	7.00%	11	0 - 15%
One-to-four family	523		Collateral valuation	7.00 - 15.00%	4 - 14	0 - 10%
Land	19		Collateral valuation	13.00%	15	0 - 10%
Total collateral dependent impaired loans	$	1,593

Other real estate owned
Land	$	1,161	Collateral valuation	—%	0	0 - 10%
Total other real estate owned	$	1,161

Table of Contents



	March 31, 2015
				Range
	Fair Value		Valuation Techniques	Rate	Maturity (years)	Unobservable Inputs
Collateral dependent impaired loans:
Business loans:
Franchise	$	1,853	Collateral valuation	6.70%	8	0 - 10%
Commercial owner occupied	379		Collateral valuation	6.75%	7	0 - 10%
Real estate loans:
Commercial non-owner occupied	458		Collateral valuation	7.00%	12	0 - 15%
One-to-four family	52		Collateral valuation	8.00% - 15.00%	5 - 16	0 - 10%
Total collateral dependent impaired loans	$	2,742

Other real estate owned
Land	$	711	Collateral valuation	—%	0	0-10%
One-to-four family	$	286	Collateral valuation	—%	0	0-10%
Total other real estate owned	$	997

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains information and statements that are considered “forward looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). These forward-looking statements represent plans, estimates, objectives, goals, guidelines, expectations, intentions, projections and statements of our beliefs concerning future events, business plans, objectives, expected operating results and the assumptions upon which those statements are based. Forward-looking statements include without limitation, any statement that may predict, forecast, indicate or imply future results, performance or achievements, and are typically identified with words such as “may,” “could,” “should,” “will,” “would,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” or words or phrases of similar meaning. We caution that the forward-looking statements are based largely on our expectations and are subject to a number of known and unknown risks and uncertainties that are subject to change based on factors which are, in many instances, beyond our control. Actual results, performance or achievements could differ materially from those contemplated, expressed, or implied by the forward-looking statements.

Table of Contents

The following factors, among others, could cause our financial performance to differ materially from that expressed in such forward-looking statements:


•	The strength of the United States economy in general and the strength of the local economies in which we conduct operations;


•	The effects of, and changes in, trade, monetary and fiscal policies and laws, including interest rate policies of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve”);


•	Inflation/deflation, interest rate, market and monetary fluctuations;


•	The timely development of competitive new products and services and the acceptance of these products and services by new and existing customers;


•	The impact of changes in financial services policies, laws and regulations, including those concerning taxes, banking, securities and insurance, and the application thereof by regulatory bodies;


•	Technological and social media changes;


•	The effect of acquisitions we have made or may make, including, without limitation, the failure to achieve the expected revenue growth or expense savings from such acquisitions, or the failure to effectively integrate an acquisition target into our operations;


•	Changes in the level of our nonperforming assets and charge-offs;


•	The effect of changes in accounting policies and practices, as may be adopted from time-to-time by bank regulatory agencies, the SEC, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the FASB or other accounting standards setters;


•	Possible OTTI of securities held by us;


•	Changes in consumer spending, borrowing and savings habits;


•	The effects of our lack of a diversified loan portfolio, including the risks of geographic and industry concentrations;


•	Ability to attract deposits and other sources of liquidity;


•	Changes in the financial performance and/or condition of our borrowers;


•	Changes in the competitive environment among financial and bank holding companies and other financial service providers;


•	Geopolitical conditions, including acts or threats of terrorism, actions taken by the United States or other governments in response to acts or threats of terrorism and/or military conflicts, which could impact business and economic conditions in the United States and abroad;


•	Unanticipated regulatory or judicial proceedings; and


•	Our ability to manage the risks involved in the foregoing.

If one or more of the factors affecting our forward-looking information and statements proves incorrect, then our actual results, performance or achievements could differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, forward-looking information and statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and other reports and registration statements filed by us with the SEC. Therefore, we caution you not to place undue reliance on our forward-looking information and statements. We will not update the forward-looking information and statements to reflect actual results or changes in the factors affecting the forward-looking information and statements. For information on the factors that could cause actual results to differ from the expectations stated in the forward-looking statements, see “Risk Factors” under Part I, Item 1A of our 2015 Annual Report.

Forward-looking information and statements should not be viewed as predictions, and should not be the primary basis upon which investors evaluate us. Any investor in our common stock should consider all risks and

Table of Contents

uncertainties disclosed in our filings with the SEC, all of which are accessible on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov.

GENERAL

This discussion should be read in conjunction with our Management Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in our 2015 Annual Report, plus the unaudited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. The results for the three months ended March 31, 2016 are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the year ending December 31, 2016.

The Corporation is a California-based bank holding company incorporated in the state of Delaware and registered as a bank holding company under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (“BHCA”). Our wholly owned subsidiary, Pacific Premier Bank, is a California state-chartered commercial bank. As a bank holding company, the Corporation is subject to regulation and supervision by the Federal Reserve. We are required to file with the Federal Reserve quarterly and annual reports and such additional information as the Federal Reserve may require pursuant to the BHCA. The Federal Reserve may conduct examinations of bank holding companies, such as the Corporation, and its subsidiaries. The Corporation is also a bank holding company within the meaning of the California Financial Code. As such, the Corporation and its subsidiaries are subject to examination by, and may be required to file reports with, the California Department of Business Oversight-Division of Financial Institutions (“DBO”).

A bank holding company, such as the Corporation, is required to serve as a source of financial strength to its subsidiary depository institutions and to commit resources to support such institutions in circumstances where it might not do so absent such a policy. The Federal Reserve, under the BHCA, has the authority to require a bank holding company to terminate any activity or to relinquish control of a nonbank subsidiary (other than a nonbank subsidiary of a bank) upon the Federal Reserve’s determination that such activity or control constitutes a serious risk to the financial soundness and stability of any bank subsidiary of the bank holding company.

As a California state-chartered commercial bank which is a member of the Federal Reserve, the Bank is subject to supervision, periodic examination and regulation by the DBO and the Federal Reserve. The Bank’s deposits are insured by the FDIC through the Deposit Insurance Fund. In general terms, insurance coverage is up to $250,000 per depositor for all deposit accounts. As a result of this deposit insurance function, the FDIC also has certain supervisory authority and powers over the Bank. If, as a result of an examination of the Bank, the regulators should determine that the financial condition, capital resources, asset quality, earnings prospects, management, liquidity or other aspects of the Bank’s operations are unsatisfactory or that the Bank or our management is violating or has violated any law or regulation, various remedies are available to the regulators. Such remedies include the power to enjoin unsafe or unsound practices, to require affirmative action to correct any conditions resulting from any violation or practice, to issue an administrative order that can be judicially enforced, to direct an increase in capital, to restrict growth, to assess civil monetary penalties, to remove officers and directors and ultimately to request the FDIC to terminate the Bank’s deposit insurance. As a California-chartered commercial bank, the Bank is also subject to certain provisions of California law.

We provide banking services within our targeted markets in California to businesses, including the owners and employees of those businesses, professionals, real estate investors and non-profit organizations, as well as consumers in the communities we serve. Additionally, through our HOA Banking and Lending and Franchise Capital units we can provide customized cash management, electronic banking services and credit facilities to HOAs, HOA management companies and QSR franchise owners nationwide. Our corporate headquarters are located in Irvine, California. At March 31, 2016, the Bank operated 22 full-service depository branches in California located in the cities of Corona, Encinitas, Huntington Beach, Irvine, Los Alamitos, Murrieta, Newport Beach, Orange, Palm Desert (3), Palm Springs (2), Redlands, Riverside (2), San Bernardino (2), San Diego (2), Seal Beach and Tustin. On April 22, 2016, the Bank closed three branches, as announced in conjunction with the merger with Security Bank of California. Those branches were located in Palm Desert, Riverside, and Tustin. On May 2, 2016,

Table of Contents

the Corporation announced the consolidation of three branches into existing branches in close proximity. The Bank anticipates closing one of its branches in San Diego and its Seal Beach branch on July 29, 2016 and closing one of its branches in Palm Springs on August 5, 2016. After these branch closures, the Bank will operate 16 full-service depository branches in California. Through our branches and our web site at www.ppbi.com, we offer a broad array of deposit products and services for both business and consumer customers, including checking, money market and savings accounts, cash management services, electronic banking, and on-line bill payment. We also offer a variety of loan products, including commercial business loans, lines of credit, commercial real estate loans, SBA loans, residential home loans, and home equity loans. The Bank funds its lending and investment activities with retail deposits obtained through its branches, advances from the FHLB, lines of credit, and wholesale and brokered certificates of deposits.

Our principal source of income is the net spread between interest earned on loans and investments and the interest costs associated with deposits and borrowings used to finance the loan and investment portfolios. Additionally, the Bank generates fee income from loan and investment sales and various products and services offered to both depository and loan customers.

Table of Contents

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Management has established various accounting policies that govern the application of U.S. GAAP in the preparation of our financial statements. Our significant accounting policies are described in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our 2015 Annual Report. There have been no significant changes to our Critical Accounting Policies as described in our 2015 Annual Report.

Certain accounting policies require management to make estimates and assumptions which have a material impact on the carrying value of certain assets and liabilities; management considers these to be critical accounting policies. The estimates and assumptions management uses are based on historical experience and other factors, which management believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ significantly from these estimates and assumptions, which could have a material impact on the carrying value of assets and liabilities at balance sheet dates and our results of operations for future reporting periods.

We consider the ALLL to be a critical accounting policy that requires judicious estimates and assumptions in the preparation of our financial statements that is particularly susceptible to significant change. For further information, see “Allowances for Loan Losses” discussed in Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our 2015 Annual Report.

SCAF ACQUISITION

Effective January 31, 2016, the Company acquired SCAF, and its wholly-owned bank subsidary, Security Bank of California, a Riverside, California, based state-chartered bank, pursuant to the terms of a definitive agreement entered into by the Corporation and SCAF on October 2, 2015. As a result of the SCAF acquisition, the Bank acquired and recorded at the acquisition date assets with a fair value of approximately $765 million, including:


•	$456 million of gross loans;


•	$190 million in investment securities;


•	$51.3 million in goodwill;


•	$40.9 million of cash and cash equivalents;


•	$18.3 million of other types of assets; and


•	$4.4 million in fixed assets;


•	$4.3 million of a core deposit intangible.

Also as a result of the SCAF acquisition, the Company recorded $119 million of equity in connection with the Corporation’s stock issued to SCAF shareholders as part of the acquisition consideration and assumed at acquisition date liabilities with a fair value of approximately $645 million, including:


•	$637 million in deposit transaction accounts; and


•	$8.8 million other liabilities.

The fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed were determined based on the requirements of FASB ASC Topic 820: Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.

The acquisition was an opportunity for the Company to further strengthen its competitive position as one of the premier community banks headquartered in Southern California. The integration and system conversion of SCAF was completed in April of 2016.

Table of Contents

IDPK ACQUISITION

Effective January 26, 2015, the Company acquired IDPK, a Newport Beach, California, based state-chartered bank, pursuant to the terms of a definitive agreement entered into by the Corporation, the Bank and IDPK on October 22, 2014. As a result of the IDPK acquisition, the Bank acquired and recorded at the acquisition date assets with a fair value of approximately $423 million, including:


•	$333 million of gross loans;


•	$56.1 million in investment securities;


•	$27.9 million in goodwill;


•	$11.3 million in bank owned life insurance;


•	$10.5 million of cash and cash equivalents;


•	$9.3 million of other types of assets; and


•	$2.9 million of a core deposit intangible.

Also as a result of the IDPK acquisition, the Company recorded $72.2 million of equity in connection with the Corporation’s stock issued to IDPK shareholders as part of the acquisition consideration and assumed at acquisition date liabilities with a fair value of approximately $371.1 million, including:


•	$270 million in deposit transaction accounts;


•	$66 million in retail certificates of deposit;


•	$33.3 million in FHLB advances; and


•	$1.8 million other liabilities.

The fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed were determined based on the requirements of FASB ASC Topic 820: Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.

The acquisition was an opportunity for the Company to strengthen its competitive position as one of the premier community banks headquartered in Southern California. Additionally, the IDPK acquisition enhanced and connected the Company’s footprint in Southern California. The integration and system conversion of IDPK was completed in April of 2015.

Table of Contents

NON-GAAP MEASUREMENTS

For periods presented below, adjusted net income, adjusted diluted earnings per share and adjusted return on average assets are non-GAAP financial measures derived from GAAP-based amounts. We calculate these figures by excluding merger-related expenses in the period results. Management believes that the exclusion of such items from these financial measures provides useful information to an understanding of the operating results of our core business. However, these non-GAAP financial measures are supplemental and are not a substitute for an analysis based on GAAP measures. As other companies may use different calculations for these adjusted measures, this presentation may not be comparable to other similarly titled adjusted measures reported by other companies.



	Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2016			December 31, 2015			March 31, 2015
	March 31, 2016			December 31, 2015			March 31, 2015

Net income	$	8,554		$	8,065		$	1,789
Plus merger related expenses, net of tax	2,103			407			2,510
Plus litigation expenses, net of tax	$	—		$	82		$	—
Adjusted net income	$	10,657		$	8,554		$	4,299

Diluted earnings per share	$	0.33		$	0.37		$	0.09
Plus merger-related expenses, net of tax	0.08			0.02			0.12
Adjusted diluted earnings per share	$	0.41		$	0.39		$	0.21

Return on average assets	1.04		%	1.18		%	0.29		%
Plus merger-related expenses, net of tax	0.26		%	0.07		%	0.41		%
Adjusted return on average assets	1.30		%	1.25		%	0.70		%

Table of Contents

For periods presented below, return on average tangible common equity and adjusted return on average tangible common equity are non-GAAP financial measures derived from GAAP-based amounts. We calculate these figures by excluding merger-related expenses and/or CDI amortization expense and exclude the average CDI and average goodwill from the average stockholders’ equity during the period. Management believes that the exclusion of such items from these financial measures provides useful information to an understanding of the operating results of our core business. However, these non-GAAP financial measures are supplemental and are not a substitute for an analysis based on GAAP measures. As other companies may use different calculations for these adjusted measures, this presentation may not be comparable to other similarly titled adjusted measures reported by other companies.



	Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2016			December 31, 2015			March 31, 2015
	March 31, 2016			December 31, 2015			March 31, 2015

Net income	$	8,554		$	8,065		$	1,789
Plus tax effected CDI amortization	206			217			160
Net income for average tangible common equity	8,760			8,282			1,949
Plus merger related expenses, net of tax	2,103			407			2,510
Plus litigation expenses, net of tax	—			82			—
Adjusted net income for average tangible common equity	$	10,863		$	8,771		$	4,459
Average stockholders’ equity	$	387,202		$	293,334		$	241,644
Less average CDI	10,110			7,394			6,909
Less average goodwill	85,581			50,832			41,657
Average tangible common equity	$	291,511		$	235,108		$	193,078
Return on average tangible common equity	12.02		%	14.09		%	4.04		%
Adjusted return on average tangible common equity	14.91		%	14.92		%	9.24		%

Table of Contents

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

In the first quarter of 2016, we reported net income of $8.6 million, or $0.33 per diluted share. This compares with net income of $8.1 million, or $0.37 per diluted share for the fourth quarter of 2015. Net interest income increased by $5.4 million from the fourth quarter of 2015, reflecting an increase in earning assets and an increase in net interest margin. Non-interest expense for the first quarter of 2016 included $3.1 million in merger-related expenses associated with the acquisition of SCAF. Excluding merger-related expenses, net of tax, adjusted net income for the first quarter of 2016 was $10.7 million, or $0.41 per diluted share. The changes in net interest income and non interest expense were impacted by the acquisition of SCAF.

Net income of $8.6 million, or $0.33 per diluted share, for the first quarter of 2016 compares to net income for the first quarter of 2015 of $1.8 million or $0.09 per diluted share. The increase in net earnings of $6.8 million was mostly due to the $10.5 million increase in net interest income resulting from earning asset growth and an increase in net interest margin. Non interest income increased by $3.4 million from the first quarter of 2015, highlighted by $1.9 million increase in gain on sale of loans for the first quarter of 2016. These items were offset by a $3.2 million increase in non-interest expense, including $2.6 million in compensation and benefits expenses associated with both the acquisition of SCAF and growth in staffing to support organic growth.

For the three months ended March 31, 2016, the Company’s return on average assets was 1.04% and return on average tangible common equity was 12.02%, or 1.30% and 14.91% after adjusting for the merger-related expenses, respectively. For the three months ended December 31, 2015 the return on average assets was 1.18% and the return on average tangible common equity was 14.09%, or 1.25% and 14.92% after adjusting for the merger-related expenses, respectively. For the three months ended March 31, 2015 the return on average assets was 0.29% and the return on average tangible common equity was 4.04%, or 0.70% and 9.24% after adjusting for the merger-related expenses, respectively.

Net Interest Income

Our earnings are derived predominately from net interest income, which is the difference between the interest income earned on interest-earning assets, primarily loans and securities, and the interest expense incurred on interest-bearing liabilities, primarily deposits and borrowings. Net interest income is affected by changes in both interest rates and the volume of average interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities.

Net interest income totaled $34.2 million in the first quarter of 2016, an increase of $5.4 million or 18.6% from the fourth quarter of 2015. The increase in net interest income reflected an increase in average interest-earning assets of $487 million, and an increase in the net interest margin of 5 basis points to 4.48%. The increase in average interest-earning assets during the first quarter of 2016 was primarily related to the acquisition of SCAF, which added $467 million in loans, before purchase accounting adjustments, and continued organic growth. In addition to these increases, our net interest income and average earning assets were impacted by a reduction of loan balances in the beginning of the quarter related to exiting warehouse mortgage lending, which resulted in a $142 million decrease in outstanding balances on these lines in comparison to the end of the fourth quarter of 2015. Furthermore, a $185 million multi-family loan pool was purchased shortly before the end of the first quarter of 2016. The expansion in the net interest margin benefited from the lowering of funding costs from 0.47% in the fourth quarter of 2015 to 0.43% in the current quarter.

Net interest income for the first quarter of 2016 increased $10.5 million or 44.5% compared to the first quarter of 2015. Net interest margin increased 39 basis points to 4.48% in first quarter of 2016, from 4.09% in first quarter of 2015. An increase in interest-earning assets of $724 million, related to both our organic loan growth since the end of the first quarter of 2015 and our acquisition of SCAF during the first quarter of 2016, resulted in a $7.6 million increase in net interest income. The 39 basis point improvement in net interest margin contributed an additional $2.5 million of growth in net interest income. The increase in net interest margin was primarily the result of a 31 basis point increase in the yield on interest earning assets. The increase in earning asset yield was due to both a 17 basis point increase in average loan yields and a favorable change in asset mix as average loans grew to

Table of Contents

82% of interest-earning assets during the first quarter of 2016, compared to 79% in the first quarter of 2015. The cost of interest-bearing liabilities decreased 0.05% as borrowings were lower during the first quarter of 2016 in comparison to the first quarter of 2015.

The following tables present for the periods indicated the average dollar amounts from selected balance sheet categories calculated from daily average balances and the total dollar amount, including adjustments to yields and costs, of:


•	Interest income earned from average interest-earning assets and the resultant yields; and


•	Interest expense incurred from average interest-bearing liabilities and resultant costs, expressed as rates.

Table of Contents

The tables below set forth our net interest income, net interest rate spread and net interest rate margin for the periods indicated. The net interest rate margin reflects the relative level of interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities and equals our net interest rate spread divided by average interest-earning assets for the periods indicated.



	Average Balance Sheet
	Three Months Ended						Three Months Ended						Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2016						December 31, 2015						March 31, 2015
	Average Balance		Interest		Average Yield/Cost		Average Balance		Interest		Average Yield/Cost		Average Balance		Interest		Average Yield/Cost
Assets	(dollars in thousands)
Interest-earning assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	219,539	$	241	0.44	%	$	114,027	$	57	0.20	%	$	225,189	$	129	0.23	%
Investment securities	339,593		1,857		2.19		312,008		1,673		2.14		273,162		1,428		2.09
Loans receivable, net (1)	2,512,732		35,407		5.67		2,158,759		30,181		5.55		1,849,553		25,070		5.50
Total interest-earning assets	3,071,864		37,505		4.91		2,584,794		31,911		4.90		2,347,904		26,627		4.60
Noninterest-earning assets	205,417						141,729						114,130
Total assets	$	3,277,281					$	2,726,523					$	2,462,034
Liabilities and Equity
Interest-bearing deposits:
Interest checking	$	165,581	$	47	0.11		$	132,812	$	38	0.11		$	145,813	$	45	0.13
Money market	891,110		820		0.37		735,810		642		0.35		645,762		561		0.35
Savings	94,773		38		0.16		86,363		34		0.16		87,439		36		0.17
Time	582,828		1,164		0.80		506,614		999		0.78		472,534		964		0.83
Total interest-bearing deposits	1,734,292		2,069		0.48		1,461,599		1,713		0.46		1,351,548		1,606		0.48
FHLB advances and other borrowings	111,444		325		1.17		167,817		370		0.87		201,700		375		0.75
Subordinated debentures	70,310		910		5.18		70,310		991		5.59		70,310		971		5.52
Total borrowings	181,754		1,235		2.73		238,127		1,361		2.27		272,010		1,346		2.01
Total interest-bearing liabilities	1,916,046		3,304		0.69		1,699,726		3,074		0.72		1,623,558		2,952		0.74
Noninterest-bearing deposits	949,371						709,982						573,466
Other liabilities	24,662						23,481						23,366
Total liabilities	2,890,079						2,433,189						2,220,390
Stockholders’ equity	387,202						293,334						241,644
Total liabilities and equity	$	3,277,281					$	2,726,523					$	2,462,034
Net interest income			$	34,201					$	28,837					$	23,675
Net interest rate spread (2)					4.22	%					4.18	%					3.86	%
Net interest margin (3)					4.48	%					4.43	%					4.09	%
Ratio of interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities					160.32	%					152.07	%					144.61	%

______________________________

Table of Contents

(1) Average balance includes loans held for sale and nonperforming loans and is net of deferred loan origination fees, unamortized discounts and premiums, and allowance for loan losses.

(2) Represents the difference between the yield on interest-earning assets and the cost of interest-bearing liabilities.

(3) Represents net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets.

Changes in our net interest income are a function of changes in volumes, days in a period and rates of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. The following table presents the impact the volume, days in a period and rate changes have had on our net interest income for the periods indicated. For each category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, we have provided information on changes to our net interest income with respect to:


•	Changes in volume (changes in volume multiplied by prior rate);


•	Changes in days in a period (changes in days in a period multiplied by daily interest);


•	Changes in interest rates (changes in interest rates multiplied by prior volume); and


•	The net change or the combined impact of volume, days in a period and rate changes allocated proportionately to changes in volume, days in a period and changes in interest rates.



	Three Months Ended March 31, 2016 Compared to Three Months Ended December 31, 2015 Increase (decrease) due to
	Volume			Days			Rate			Net
	(in thousands)
Interest-earning assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	86		$	(3	)	$	101		$	184
Investment securities	147			—			37			184
Loans receivable, net	4,962			(389		)	653			5,226
Total interest-earning assets	$	5,922		$	(392	)	$	64		$	5,594
Interest-bearing liabilities
Interest checking	$	10		$	(1	)	$	—		$	9
Money market	147			(9		)	40			178
Savings	4			—			—			4
Time	152			(13		)	26			165
FHLB advances and other borrowings	(144		)	(4		)	103			(45		)
Subordinated debentures	—			—			(81		)	(81		)
Total interest-bearing liabilities	$	385		$	(27	)	$	(128	)	$	230
Change in net interest income	$	5,393		$	(365	)	$	336		$	5,364

Table of Contents



	Three Months Ended March 31, 2016 Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2015 Increase (decrease) due to
	Volume			Days		Rate			Net
	(in thousands)
Interest-earning assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	(3	)	$	3	$	112		$	112
Investment securities	348			—		81			429
Loans receivable, net	9,157			389		791			10,337
Total interest-earning assets	$	8,597		$	392	$	1,889		$	10,878
Interest-bearing liabilities
Interest checking	$	7		$	1	$	(6	)	$	2
Money market	218			9		32			259
Savings	4			—		(2		)	2
Time	223			13		(36		)	200
FHLB advances and other borrowings	(217		)	4		163			(50		)
Subordinated debentures	—			—		(61		)	(61		)
Total interest-bearing liabilities	$	531		$	27	$	(206	)	$	352
Change in net interest income	$	7,630		$	365	$	2,531		$	10,526

Provision for Loan Losses

We recorded a $1.1 million provision for loan losses during the first quarter of 2016 as a result of growth in the loan portfolio. A majority of the provision during the first quarter of 2016, was associated with the acquisition of the multi-family loan portfolio during the quarter. The $580,000 decrease in the provision for loan losses from the fourth quarter of 2015 was mainly attributable to improvement in asset quality within certain segments of the loan portfolio. Net loan recoveries amounted to $18,000 in the first quarter of 2016, compared to net charge-offs of $528,000 from the fourth quarter of 2015.

The $1.1 million provision for loan losses during the first quarter of 2016 decreased by $710,000 from the first quarter of 2015. The decrease in the provision for loan losses was due to improvements in asset quality within certain segments of the loan portfolio. The net loan recoveries amounted to $18,000 in the first quarter of 2016, compared to net charge-offs of $384,000 from the first quarter of 2015.

For purchased credit impaired loans, charge-offs are recorded when there is a decrease in the estimated cash flows of the credit from original cash flow estimates. Purchased credit impaired loans were recorded at their estimated fair value, which incorporated our estimated expected cash flows until the ultimate resolution of these credits. To the extent actual or projected cash flows are less than originally estimated, additional provisions for loan losses or charge-offs will be recognized into earnings or against the allowance, if applicable. To the extent actual or projected cash flows are more than originally estimated, the increase in cash flows is prospectively recognized in loan interest income. Due to the accounting rules associated with our purchased credit impaired loans, each quarter we are required to re-estimate cash flows which could cause volatility in our reported net interest margin and provision for loan losses. During the first quarter of 2016, there were no charge-offs associated with purchased credit impaired loans. See “Allowance for Loan Losses” discussed below in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Table of Contents

Noninterest Income

Noninterest income for the first quarter of 2016 was $4.9 million, an increase of $645,000 or 15.3% from the fourth quarter of 2015. The increase from the fourth quarter of 2015 was primarily related to a $759,000 increase in other income and a $757,000 increase in net gain from sales of investment securities, partially offset by a $799,000 decrease in net gain from the sale of loans. The decline in gain on sale of loans was the result of lower SBA loan sales, as $21 million of loans were sold in the first quarter, compared to $33 million in the prior quarter.

Compared to the first quarter of 2015, noninterest income for the first quarter of 2016 increased $3.4 million. The increase was primarily related to an increase in gain on the sale of loans of $1.9 million, an increase in other income of $814,000 and an increase in gain on sales of investment securities of $637,000.

Noninterest Expense

Noninterest expense totaled $23.6 million for the first quarter of 2016, an increase of $5.1 million or 27.6%, compared with the fourth quarter of 2015. The increase includes higher non-recurring merger-related expenses of $2.7 million and a $2.1 million increase in compensation and benefits related to the acquisition of SCAF.

In comparison to the first quarter of 2015, noninterest expense, for the first quarter of 2016 grew by $3.2 million or 15.5%. The increase in expense was primarily related to the additional costs from the personnel and branches retained from the acquisition of SCAF, combined with our continued investment in personnel to support our organic growth in loans and deposits.

The Company’s efficiency ratio was 52.4% for the first quarter of 2016, compared to 53.8% for the fourth quarter of 2015 and 64.4% for the first quarter of 2015.

Income Taxes

For the first quarter of 2016, our effective tax rate was 40.2%, compared with 37.1% for the fourth quarter of 2015 and the first quarter of 2015; respectively. The increase in the effective tax rate was primarily the result of higher non-deductible merger-related expenses incurred in the first quarter of 2016.

FINANCIAL CONDITION

At March 31, 2016, assets totaled $3.56 billion, an increase of $772 million or 27.7% from December 31, 2015 and $810 million or 29% from March 31, 2015.

The increase in assets since December 31, 2015 was impacted by the acquisition of SCAF, which at closing added $714 million in assets including $456 million in loans, $190 million in investment securities and $51.3 million in goodwill. Additionally, organic loan growth, as well an increase in investment securities contributed to the increase in assets during the during the first quarter of 2016.

The increase in assets at March 31, 2016 as compared to March 31, 2015 was primarily due to both organic and acquisitive loan growth of $720 million.

Loans

Net loans held for investment totaled $2.83 billion at March 31, 2016, an increase of $596 million or 26.6% from December 31, 2015, and an increase of $715 million or 34% from March 31, 2015.

The increase since December 31, 2015 was primarily related to loans acquired from SCAF of $456 million at acquisition date, as well as our organic loan originations. Combined, loan growth included increases in

Table of Contents

multifamily loans of $190 million, franchise loans of $43 million, commercial owner occupied loans of $130 million, commercial and industrial loans of $181 million, construction loans of $48.3 million, SBA loans of $16.1 million, offset by a decrease in warehouse mortgage loans of $142 million.

The increase in loans from March 31, 2015, including loans acquired from SCAF, was comprised of increases in commerical and industrial of $215 million, franchise loans of $155 million, commercial owner occupied loans of $145 million, construction loans of $106 million, commercial and industrial loans of $215 million, commercial real estate non-owner occupied of $69.7 million, SBA loans of $28.5 million, offset by a decrease in warehouse mortgage loans of $215 million.

The total end of period weighted average contractual interest rate on loans, excluding fees and discounts, at March 31, 2016 was 4.88%, compared to 4.90% at December 31, 2015 and 4.90% at March 31, 2015.

Table of Contents

The following table sets forth the composition of our loan portfolio in dollar amounts, as a percentage of the portfolio and gives the weighted average interest rate by loan category at the dates indicated:



	March 31, 2016							At December 31, 2015							March 31, 2015
	Amount			Percent of Total		Weighted Average Interest Rate		Amount			Percent of Total		Weighted Average Interest Rate		Amount			Percent of Total		Weighted Average Interest Rate
	(dollars in thousands)
Business loans:
Commercial and industrial	$	491,112		17.2	%	4.79	%	$	309,741		13.7	%	5.00	%	$	276,321		13.0	%	4.96	%
Franchise	371,875			13.0		5.35		328,925			14.5		5.50		216,544			10.3		5.72
Commercial owner occupied (1)	424,289			14.8		5.01		294,726			13.0		5.00		279,704			13.1		5.20
SBA	78,350			2.7		5.73		62,256			2.8		5.50		49,855			2.3		5.47
Warehouse facilities	1,394			—		4.52		143,200			6.3		3.90		216,554			10.2		3.97
Real estate loans:
Commercial non-owner occupied	522,080			18.4		4.83		421,583			18.7		4.90		452,422			21.2		4.96
Multi-family	619,485			21.8		4.37		429,003			19.0		4.60		397,130			18.6		4.60
One-to-four family (2)	106,854			3.7		4.41		80,050			3.5		4.50		116,735			5.5		4.35
Construction	218,069			7.6		5.40		169,748			7.5		5.40		111,704			5.2		5.16
Land	18,222			0.6		5.20		18,340			0.8		5.20		7,243			0.3		5.07
Other loans	6,045			0.2		5.82		5,111			0.2		5.20		6,641			0.3		5.81
Total gross loans (3)	2,857,775			100.0	%	4.88	%	2,262,683			100.0	%	4.90	%	2,130,853			100.0	%	4.90	%
Less loans held for sale	7,281							8,565							—
Total gross loans held for investment	2,850,494							2,254,118							2,130,853
Deferred loan origination costs/(fees) and premiums/(discounts), net	938							197							534
Allowance for loan losses	(18,455		)					(17,317		)					(13,646		)
Loans held for investment, net	$	2,832,977						$	2,236,998						$	2,117,741

______________________________

(1) Majority secured by real estate.

(2) Includes second trust deeds.

(3) Total gross loans for March 31, 2016 are net of the unaccreted mark-to-market discounts on Canyon National loans of $121,000, on Palm Desert National loans of $877,000, on FAB loans of $4,000, on SDTB loans of $105,000 , on IDPK loans of $3.3 million and on SCAF loans of $10.7 million.

Table of Contents

The following table sets forth the weighted average interest rates, weighted average number of months to reprice and the periods to repricing for our gross loan portfolio at the date indicated:



	March 31, 2016
Periods to Repricing	Number of Loans	Amount		Weighted Average Interest Rate		Weighted Average Months to Reprice
	(dollars in thousands)
1 Year and less	1,956	$	851,355	5.23	%	16.29
Over 1 Year to 3 Years	560	553,766		4.58		25.00
Over 3 Years to 5 Years	724	789,872		4.63		49.19
Over 5 Years to 7 Years	128	185,182		4.67		74.13
Over 7 Years to 10 Years	154	133,461		4.71		213.46
Total adjustable	3,522	2,513,636		4.83		31.61
Fixed	1,125	336,858		5.33
Total	4,647	$	2,850,494	4.88

Delinquent Loans. When a borrower fails to make required payments on a loan and does not cure the delinquency within 30 days, we normally record a notice of default and, after providing the required notices to the borrower, commence foreclosure proceedings. If the loan is not reinstated within the time permitted by law, we may sell the property at a foreclosure sale. At these foreclosure sales, we generally acquire title to the property. At March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, loans delinquent 30 or more days as a percentage of total gross loans was 0.12%, comparable to 0.12% at December 31, 2015 and a decrease from 0.15% at March 31, 2015.

The following table sets forth delinquencies in the Company’s loan portfolio at the dates indicated:



	30 - 59 Days				60 - 89 Days				90 Days or More (1)				Total
	# of Loans	Principal Balance of Loans			# of Loans	Principal Balance of Loans			# of Loans	Principal Balance of Loans			# of Loans	Principal Balance of Loans
	(dollars in thousands)
At March 31, 2016
Business loans:
Commercial and industrial	—	$	—		—	$	—		3	$	316		3	$	316
Franchise	—	—			—	—			3	1,630			3	1,630
SBA	1	246			—	—			—	—			1	246
Real estate loans:
One-to-four family	1	1			—	—			4	1,234			5	1,235
Land	—	—			—	—			1	19			1	19
Other	—	—			—	—			—	—			—	—
Total	2	$	247		—	$	—		11	$	3,199		13	$	3,446
Delinquent loans to total gross loans		0.01		%		—		%		0.11		%		0.12		%

Table of Contents




At December 31, 2015
Business loans:
Commercial and industrial	2	20			—	—			1	257			3	277
Franchise	—	—			—	—			3	1,630			3	1,630
Commercial owner occupied	—	—			1	355			—	—			1	355
Real estate loans:
Commercial non-owner occupied	1	214			—	—			—	—			1	214
One-to-four family	1	89			—	—			2	46			3	135
Land	—	—			—	—			1	21			1	21
Total	4	$	323		1	$	355		7	$	1,954		12	$	2,632
Delinquent loans to total gross loans		0.01		%		0.02		%		0.09		%		0.12		%

At March 31, 2015
Business loans:
Commercial and industrial	1	$	146		—	$	—		2	$	325		4	$	471
Franchise	—	—			—	—			1	1,853			1	1,853
Commercial owner occupied	1	349			1	375			1	27			3	751
Real estate loans:
One-to-four family	3	149			—	—			3	53			6	202
Other	1	1			—	—			—	—			1	1
Total	6	$	645		1	$	375		7	$	2,258		15	$	3,278
Delinquent loans to total gross loans		0.03		%		0.02		%		0.11		%		0.15		%

______________________________

(1) All loans that are delinquent 90 days or more are on nonaccrual status and reported as part of nonperforming loans.

Allowance for Loan Losses. The ALLL represents an estimate of probable losses inherent in our loan portfolio and is based on our continual review of credit quality of the loan portfolio. The allowance contains a specific reserve component for loans that are determined to be impaired and a general reserve component for loans without credit impairment. The general reserve is determined by applying a systematically derived loss factor to individual segments of the loan portfolio. The adequacy and appropriateness of the ALLL and the individual loss factors are reviewed each quarter by management.

The loss factor for each segment of our loan portfolio is generally based on our actual historical loss rate experience supplemented by management judgment for certain segments where we lack loss history experience. We also consider historical charge-off rates for the last 10 and 15 years for commercial banks and savings institutions headquartered in California as collected and reported by the FDIC. The loss factor is adjusted by qualitative adjustment factors to arrive at a final loss factor for each loan portfolio segment. For additional information regarding the qualitative adjustments, please see “Allowances for Loan Losses” as discussed in our 2015 Annual Report. The qualitative factors allow management to assess current trends within our loan portfolio and the

Table of Contents

economic environment to incorporate their effect when calculating the ALLL. The final loss factors are applied to pass graded loans within our loan portfolio. Higher factors are applied to loans graded below pass, including classified and criticized assets.

No assurance can be given that we will not, in any particular period, sustain loan losses that exceed the amount reserved, or that subsequent evaluation of our loan portfolio, in light of the prevailing factors, including economic conditions which may adversely affect our market area or other circumstances, will not require significant increases in the loan loss allowance. In addition, regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review our ALLL and may require us to recognize additional provisions to increase the allowance or take charge-offs in anticipation of future losses.

At March 31, 2016, our ALLL was $18.5 million, an increase of $1.1 million from December 31, 2015 and $4.8 million from March 31, 2015. The increase in the allowance for loan losses at March 31, 2016 was mainly attributable to the growth in the multi-family segment of the loan portfolio, which resulted primarily from a purchase of a multi-family loan pool. At March 31, 2016, given the composition of our loan portfolio, the ALLL was considered adequate to cover estimated losses inherent in the loan portfolio. Should any of the factors considered by management in evaluating the appropriate level of the ALLL change, the Company’s estimate of probable loan losses could also change, which could affect the level of future provisions for loan losses.

Table of Contents

The following table sets forth the Company’s ALLL and its corresponding percentage of the loan category balance and the percent of loan balance to total gross loans in each of the loan categories listed for the periods indicated:



	March 31, 2016						December 31, 2015						March 31, 2015
Balance at End of Period Applicable to	Amount		Allowance as a % of Category Total		% of Loans in Category to Total Loans		Amount		Allowance as a % of Category Total		% of Loans in Category to Total Loans		Amount		Allowance as a % of Category Total		% of Loans in Category to Total Loans
	(dollars in thousands)
Business loans:
Commercial and industrial	$	3,023	0.62	%	17.2	%	$	3,449	1.11	%	13.7	%	$	3,443	1.25	%	13.0	%
Franchise	3,568		0.96		13.0		3,124		0.95		14.5		1,740		0.80		10.3
Commercial owner occupied	1,965		0.46		14.8		1,870		0.63		13.0		1,602		0.57		13.1
SBA	1,628		2.08		2.7		1,500		2.41		2.8		547		1.10		2.3
Warehouse facilities	7		0.50		—		759		0.53		6.3		889		0.41		10.2
Real estate loans:
Commercial non-owner occupied	1,897		0.36		18.4		2,048		0.49		18.7		2,131		0.47		21.2
Multi-family	2,932		0.47		21.8		1,583		0.37		19.0		1,303		0.33		18.6
One-to-four family	705		0.66		3.7		698		0.87		3.5		674		0.58		5.5
Construction	2,504		1.15		7.6		2,030		1.20		7.5		1,210		1.08		5.2
Land	204		1.12		0.6		233		1.27		0.8		78		1.08		0.3
Other Loans	22		0.36		0.2		23		0.45		0.2		29		0.44		0.3
Total	$	18,455	0.65	%	100.0	%	$	17,317	0.77	%	100.0	%	$	13,646	0.64	%	100.0	%

The ALLL as a percent of nonaccrual loans was 382.65% at March 31, 2016, down from 436.20% at December 31, 2015, and up from 292.64% at March 31, 2015. At March 31, 2016, the ratio of ALLL to total gross loans was 0.65%, a decrease from 0.77% at December 31, 2015 and an increase from 0.64% at March 31, 2015. The decrease in this ratio at March 31, 2016 from December 31, 2015 is attributable to the loans acquired from SCAF, recorded at fair value, which did not necessitate an allowance against them. Our ratio of ALLL plus the remaining unamortized credit discount on the loans acquired to total gross loans was 0.97% at March 31, 2016, an increase from 0.91% at December 31, 2015 and 0.90% at March 31, 2015.

Table of Contents

The following table sets forth the activity within the Company’s ALLL in each of the loan categories listed for the periods indicated:



	Three Months Ended
	March 31,			December 31,			March 31,
	2016			2015			2015
	(dollars in thousands)
Balance, beginning of period	$	17,317		$	16,145		$	12,200
Provision for loan losses	1,120			1,700			1,830
Charge-offs:
Business loans:
Commercial and industrial	—			(412		)	(24		)
Franchise	—			—			(372		)
Real estate:
Commercial non-owner occupied	—			(116		)	—
One-to-four family	—			(16		)	—
Total charge-offs	—			(544		)	(396		)
Recoveries :
Business loans:
Commercial and industrial	14			12			—
SBA	3			4			—
Real estate:
Commercial non-owner occupied	—			—			12
One-to-four family	1			—			—
Other loans	—			—			—
Total recoveries	18			16			12
Net loan (charge-offs) recoveries	18			(528		)	(384		)
Balance at end of period	$	18,455		$	17,317		$	13,646

Ratios:
Net charge-offs (recoveries) to average total loans, net	—		%	0.10		%	0.08		%
Allowance for loan losses to gross loans at end of period	0.65		%	0.77		%	0.64		%

Investment Securities

We primarily use our investment portfolio for liquidity purposes and to support our interest rate risk management strategies. Investment securities available for sale totaled $270 million at March 31, 2016, a decrease of $10.6 million or 3.8% from December 31, 2015, and decrease of $10.8 million or 3.8% from March 31, 2015. The decrease in investment securities from December 31, 2015 was primarily due to the sale or maturity of securities available for sale in the amount of $193 million, of which $190 million was acquired from SCAF, and principal paydowns of $7.2 million, offset by a change in unrealized gain of $1.9 million. The Bank deployed the liquidity from the sale of the SCAF bond portfolio into the purchase of $185 million in multifamily loans.

Table of Contents

The following tables set forth the amortized cost, unrealized gains and losses, and estimated fair value of our investment securities portfolio at the dates indicated:



	March 31, 2016
	Amortized Cost		Unrealized Gain		Unrealized Loss			Estimated Fair Value
	(in thousands)
Available for sale:
Municipal bonds	$	123,484	$	2,426	$	(28	)	$	125,882
Collateralized mortgage obligation	23,805		70		(9		)	23,866
Mortgage-backed securities	119,939		499		(475		)	119,963
Total securities available for sale	$	267,228	$	2,995	$	(512	)	$	269,711
Investment securities held to maturity:
Mortgage-backed securities	8,361		22		—			8,383
Other	1,229		—		—			1,229
Total securities held to maturity	9,590		22		—			9,612
Total securities	$	276,818	$	3,017	$	(512	)	$	279,323



	December 31, 2015
	Amortized Cost		Unrealized Gain		Unrealized Loss			Estimated Fair Value
	(in thousands)
Available for sale:
Municipal bonds	$	128,546	$	1,796	$	(97	)	$	130,245
Collateralized mortgage obligation	24,722		4		(183		)	24,543
Mortgage-backed securities	126,443		153		(1,111		)	125,485
Total securities available for sale	$	279,711	$	1,953	$	(1,391	)	$	280,273
Held to maturity:
Mortgage-backed securities	8,400		—		(70		)	8,330
Other	1,242		—		—			1,242
Total securities held to maturity	9,642		—		(70		)	9,572
Total securities	$	289,353	$	1,953	$	(1,461	)	$	289,845



	March 31, 2015
	Amortized Cost		Unrealized Gain		Unrealized Loss			Estimated Fair Value
	(in thousands)
Available for sale:
Municipal bonds	$	103,997	$	1,718	$	(192	)	105,523
Collateralized mortgage obligation	11,204		84		—			11,288
Mortgage-backed securities	163,077		1,013		(440		)	163,650
Total securities available for sale	$	278,278	$	2,815	$	(632	)	$	280,461

Table of Contents

The following table sets forth the fair values and weighted average yields on our investment securities available for sale portfolio by contractual maturity at the date indicated:



	March 31, 2016
	One Year or Less				More than One to Five Years				More than Five Years to Ten Years				More than Ten Years				Total
	Fair Value		Weighted Average Yield		Fair Value		Weighted Average Yield		Fair Value		Weighted Average Yield		Fair Value		Weighted Average Yield		Fair Value		Weighted Average Yield
	(dollars in thousands)
Available for sale:
Municipal bonds	$	1,423	0.79	%	$	27,886	1.40	%	$	44,398	2.05	%	$	52,175	1.91	%	$	125,882	1.83	%
Collateralized mortgage obligation	—		—		—		—		—		—		23,866		1.90		23,866		1.90
Mortgage-backed securities	—		—		—		—		29,196		1.82		90,767		1.82		119,963		1.82
Total securities available for sale	$	1,423	0.79	%	$	27,886	1.40	%	$	73,594	1.96	%	$	166,808	1.86	%	$	269,711	1.83	%
Held to maturity:
Mortgage-backed securities	—		—		—		—		—		—		8,383		3.18		8,383		3.18
Other	—		—		—		—		—		—		1,229		0.93		1,229		0.93
Total securities held to maturity	—		—		—		—		—		—		$	9,612	2.89	%	$	9,612	2.89	%
Total securities	$	1,423	0.79	%	$	27,886	1.40	%	$	73,594	1.96	%	$	176,420	1.91	%	$	279,323	1.77	%

Each quarter, we review individual securities classified as available for sale to determine whether a decline in fair value below the amortized cost basis is other-than-temporary. If it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the debt security, an OTTI write-down is recorded against the security and a loss recognized.

In determining if a security has an OTTI loss, we consider the 1) length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less then amortized cost; 2) financial condition and near term prospects of the issuer; 3) impact of changes in market interest rates; and 4) intent and ability of the Company to retain its investment for a period of time sufficient to allow any anticipated recovery in fair value and whether it is not more likely than not the Company would be required to sell the security. We estimate OTTI losses on a security primarily through:


•	An evaluation of the present value of estimated cash flows from the security using the current yield to accrete beneficial interest and including assumptions in the prepayment rate, default rate, delinquencies, loss severity and percentage of nonperforming assets;


•	An evaluation of the estimated payback period to recover principal;


•	An analysis of the credit support available in the underlying security to absorb losses; and


•	A review of the financial condition and near term prospects of the issuer.

Table of Contents

During the quarter ended March 31, 2016, December 31, 2015 and March 31, 2015, there were no OTTI recoveries. We recorded no impairment credit losses on available-for-sale securities in our consolidated statement of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2016, December 31, 2015 and March 31, 2015. We recorded a $207,000 impairment during the first quarter of 2016 related to a held-to-maturity equity investment.

Nonperforming Assets

Nonperforming assets consist of loans on which we have ceased accruing interest (nonaccrual loans), restructured loans and OREO. It is our general policy to account for a loan as nonaccrual when the loan becomes 90 days delinquent or when collection of interest appears doubtful.

Nonperforming assets totaled $6.0 million, or 0.17% of total assets at March 31, 2016, an increase from $5.1 million, or 0.18% of total assets at December 31, 2015 and $5.7 million, or 0.21% of total assets at March 31, 2015. At March 31, 2016, nonperforming loans increased $853,000 from December 31, 2015 and $160,000 from March 31, 2015.

The following table sets forth our composition of nonperforming assets at the dates indicated:



	March 31, 2016			December 31, 2015			March 31, 2015
	(dollars in thousands)
Nonperforming assets
Business loans:
Commercial and industrial	$	498		$	463		$	601
Franchise	1,630			1,630			1,854
Commercial owner occupied	839			536			527
SBA	69			—			—
Real estate:
Commercial non-owner occupied	428			1,164			1,602
One-to-four family	1,340			155			79
Land	19			21			—
Other loans	—			1			—
Total nonaccrual loans	4,823			3,970			4,663
Other real estate owned:
One-to-four family	—			—			286
Land	1,161			1,161			711
Total other real estate owned	1,161			1,161			997
Total nonperforming assets, net	$	5,984		$	5,131		$	5,660

Allowance for loan losses	$	18,455		$	17,317		$	13,646
Allowance for loan losses as a percent of total nonperforming loans	382.65		%	436.20		%	292.64		%
Nonperforming loans as a percent of gross loans	0.17			0.18			0.22
Nonperforming assets as a percent of total assets	0.17			0.18			0.21

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

Total liabilities were $3.13 billion at March 31, 2016, compared to $2.49 billion at December 31, 2015 and $2.48 billion at March 31, 2015. The increase of $642,525 thousand or 26% from the year ended December 31, 2015 and the increase of $654 million or 26% from March 31, 2015 was primarily related to the acquisition of SCAF, which added $645 million in assumed liabilities at the acquisition date.

Table of Contents

Deposits. At March 31, 2016, deposits totaled $2.91 billion, an increase of $711 million or 32% from December 31, 2015 and $863 million or 42% from March 31, 2015.

The increase in deposits since December 31, 2015 included increases in noninterest bearing checking of $353 million, money market accounts of $251 million, certificates of deposit of $63.8 million, interest bearing checking of $25.7 million and savings of $17.6 million. The increase in deposits during the first three months of 2016 was due to organic growth and the acquisition of SCAF, which added $637 million in deposits.

The increase in deposits since March 31, 2015 included increases in noninterest bearing checking of $445 million, money market accounts of $275 million, certificates of deposit of $102 million, interest bearing checking of $29.8 million and savings of $12.2 million.

The total end of period weighted average rate of deposits at March 31, 2016 was 0.31%, a decrease from 0.32% at December 31, 2015 and no change from 0.33% at March 31, 2015.

At March 31, 2016, our gross loan to deposit ratio was 98.4%, a decrease from 103.1% at December 31, 2015 and 104.3% at March 31, 2015.

The following table sets forth the distribution of the Company’s deposit accounts at the dates indicated and the weighted average interest rates on each category of deposits presented:



	March 31, 2016						December 31, 2015						March 31, 2015
	Balance		% of Total Deposits		Weighted Average Rate		Balance		% of Total Deposits		Weighted Average Rate		Balance		% of Total Deposits		Weighted Average Rate
	(dollars in thousands)
Noninterest bearing checking	$	1,064,457	36.7	%	0.00	%	$	711,771	32.5	%	0.00	%	$	619,763	30.3	%	0.00	%
Interest-bearing deposits:
Checking	160,707		5.5		0.11		134,998		6.1		0.11		130,869		6.4		0.11
Money market	995,269		34.2		0.38		743,872		33.9		0.35		720,510		35.3		0.36
Savings	101,065		3.5		0.15		83,507		3.8		0.15		88,898		4.4		0.17
Time deposit accounts:
Less than 1.00%	376,319		12.9		0.61		346,692		15.8		0.61		301,611		14.8		0.61
1.00 - 1.99	200,696		6.9		1.16		172,218		7.8		1.16		173,860		8.5		1.11
2.00 - 2.99	7,106		0.2		2.23		1,401		0.1		2.26		6,314		0.3		2.80
3.00 - 3.99	21		0.0		3.81		20		0.0		3.81		613		0.0		3.23
4.00 - 4.99	3		0.0		4.93		3		0.0		4.93		3		0.0		4.93
5.00 and greater	621		0.0		5.11		641		—		5.19		725		—		5.22
Total time deposit accounts	584,766		20.1		0.82		520,975		23.7		0.80		483,126		23.6		0.83
Total interest-bearing deposits	1,841,807		63.4		0.48		1,483,352		67.6		0.48		1,423,403		69.7		0.48
Total deposits	$	2,906,264	100.0	%	0.31	%	$	2,195,123	100.0	%	0.32	%	$	2,043,166	100.0	%	0.33	%

Table of Contents

Borrowings. At March 31, 2016, total borrowings amounted to $195 million, down $71 million or 26.7% from December 31, 2015 and a decrease of $218 million or 52.8% from March 31, 2015.

At March 31, 2016, total borrowings represented 5.5% of total assets and had an end of period weighted average rate of 2.7%, compared with 9.5% of total assets at a weighted average rate of 2.0% at December 31, 2015 and 15.0% of total assets at a weighted average rate of 1.37% at March 31, 2015.

At March 31, 2016, total borrowings were comprised of the following:


•	Overnight FHLB advances of $55 million at .48%;


•	Subordinated notes of $60 million at 5.75% due September 3, 2024. For additional information about the Subordinated notes, see Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this report;


•	One 24 month fixed FHLB advance of $25 million at .84% due September 15, 2016;


•	Three reverse repurchase agreements totaling $28.5 million at a weighted average rate of 3.26% with $10 million due in February 2018 and $18.5 million due in September 2018. These agreements are secured by government sponsored entity MBS securities with a par value of $32.9 million and a fair value of $34.2 million;


•	HOA reverse repurchase agreements totaling $16.4 million at a weighted average rate of .01% and secured by government sponsored entity MBS securities with a par value of $28.7 million and a fair value of $29.6 million; and


•	Subordinated debentures used to fund the issuance of Trust Preferred Securities in 2004 of $10.3 million at 3.04% due April 7, 2034. For additional information about the Subordinated Debentures and Trust Preferred Securities, see Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this report.

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the Company’s borrowed funds at the dates indicated:



	March 31, 2016					December 31, 2015					March 31, 2015
	Balance			Weighted Average Rate		Balance			Weighted Average Rate		Balance			Weighted Average Rate
	(dollars in thousands)
FHLB advances	$	80,000		0.59	%	$	148,000		0.42	%	$	300,000		0.32	%
Reverse repurchase agreements	44,956			2.07	%	48,125			1.94	%	43,434			2.15	%
Subordinated debentures	70,310			5.35	%	70,310			5.34	%	70,310			5.34	%
Total borrowings	$	195,266		2.65	%	$	266,435		2.00	%	$	413,744		1.37	%

Weighted average cost of borrowings during the quarter	2.73		%			2.27		%			2.01		%
Borrowings as a percent of total assets	5.5		%			9.5		%			15.0		%

Stockholders’ Equity. Total stockholders’ equity was $429 million as of March 31, 2016, an increase from $299 million at December 31, 2015 and $273 million at March 31, 2015. The current year increase of $130 million in stockholders’ equity was primarily related to equity consideration of $119 million associated with the acquisition of SCAF, and net income for the first three months of 2016 of $8.6 million. The increase of $156 million from March 31, 2015 was primarily related to equity consideration of $119 million associated with the acquisition of SCAF, and net income over the period of $32.3 million.

Table of Contents

Our book value per share increased to $15.58 at March 31, 2016, up from $13.86 at December 31, 2015 and $12.78 at March 31, 2015. At March 31, 2016, the Company’s tangible common equity to tangible assets ratio was 9.15%, an increase from 8.82% at December 31, 2015, and 7.95% at March 31, 2015.

Tangible common equity to tangible assets (the “tangible common equity ratio”) is a non-GAAP financial measure derived from GAAP-based amounts. We calculate the tangible common equity ratio by excluding the balance of intangible assets from common shareholders’ equity and dividing by tangible assets. We believe that this information is important to shareholders as tangible equity is a measure that is consistent with the calculation of capital for bank regulatory purposes, which excludes intangible assets from the calculation of risk-based ratios.

PACIFIC PREMIER BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

GAAP Reconciliation

(dollars in thousands)



	March 31,			December 31,			March 31,
	2016			2015			2015
Total stockholders’ equity	$	428,894		$	298,980		$	273,247
Less: Intangible assets	(113,230		)	(58,002		)	(59,213		)
Tangible common equity	$	315,664		$	240,978		$	214,034

Total assets	$	3,563,085		$	2,790,646		$	2,753,000
Less: Intangible assets	(113,230		)	(58,002		)	(59,213		)
Tangible assets	$	3,449,855		$	2,732,644		$	2,693,787

Tangible common equity ratio	9.15		%	8.82		%	7.95		%

CAPITAL RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY

Our primary sources of funds are deposits, advances from the FHLB and other borrowings, principal and interest payments on loans, and income from investments. While maturities and scheduled amortization of loans are a predictable source of funds, deposit inflows and outflows as well as loan prepayments are greatly influenced by general interest rates, economic conditions, and competition.

Our primary sources of funds generated during the first three months of 2016 were from:


•	Proceeds from the sale or maturity of securities available for sale of $193 million


•	Proceeds of $120 million from the sale and principal payments on loans held for investment;


•	Net change of $175 million of undisbursed loan funds; and


•	Net increase of $75 million in deposit accounts.

We used these funds to:


•	Purchase and originate loans held for investment of $436 million; and


•	Reduce borrowings by $71 million.

Our most liquid assets are unrestricted cash and short-term investments. The levels of these assets are dependent on our operating, lending and investing activities during any given period. Our liquidity position is continuously monitored and adjustments are made to the balance between sources and uses of funds as deemed appropriate. At March 31, 2016, cash and cash equivalents totaled $194 million and the market value of our investment securities available for sale totaled $270 million. If additional funds are needed, we have additional sources of liquidity that can be accessed, including FHLB advances, federal fund lines, the Federal Reserve’s

Table of Contents

lending programs and loan sales. As of March 31, 2016, the maximum amount we could borrow through the FHLB was $1.25 billion, of which $478 million was available for borrowing based on collateral pledged of $539 million in real estate loans. At March 31, 2016, we had $80 million in FHLB borrowings against that available balance. At March 31, 2016, we also had unsecured lines of credit aggregating $173 million, which consisted of $120 million with other financial institutions from which to draw funds and $3.3 million with the Federal Reserve Bank and one reverse repo line with a correspondent bank of $50 million. For the quarter ended March 31, 2016, our average liquidity ratio was 12.44%. The Company regularly models liquidity stress scenarios to ensure that adequate liquidity is available and has contingency funding plans in place which are reviewed and tested on a regular basis.

To the extent that 2016 deposit growth is not sufficient to satisfy our ongoing commitments to fund maturing and withdrawable deposits, repay maturing borrowings, fund existing and future loans, or make investments, we may access funds through our FHLB borrowing arrangement, unsecured lines of credit or other sources.

The Bank has a policy in place that permits the purchase of brokered funds, in an amount not to exceed 15% of total deposits, as a secondary source for funding. At March 31, 2016, we had $129 million in brokered time deposits, which constituted 4.4% of total deposits at that date.

The Corporation is a corporate entity separate and apart from the Bank that must provide for its own liquidity. The Corporation’s primary sources of liquidity are dividends from the Bank. There are statutory and regulatory provisions that limit the ability of the Bank to pay dividends to the Corporation. Management believes that such restrictions will not have a material impact on the ability of the Corporation to meet its ongoing cash obligations.

The Corporation has never declared or paid dividends on its common stock and does not anticipate declaring or paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. The Corporation’s board of directors authorized in June 2012 a stock repurchase plan, which allows the Corporation to proactively manage its capital position and return excess capital to its stockholders. The repurchase plan authorizes the repurchase of up to 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. Shares purchased under such plans also provide the Corporation with shares of common stock necessary to satisfy obligations related to stock compensation awards. Also, please see Part II, Item 2 - Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds for additional information.

Contractual Obligations and Off-Balance Sheet Commitments

Contractual Obligations. The Company enters into contractual obligations in the normal course of business primarily as a source of funds for its asset growth and to meet required capital needs.

The following schedule summarizes maturities and payments due on our obligations and commitments, excluding accrued interest, as of the date indicated:



	March 31, 2016
	Less than 1 year		1 - 3 years		3 - 5 years		More than 5 years		Total
	(in thousands)
Contractual obligations
FHLB advances	$	80,000	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	80,000
Other borrowings	16,456		28,500		—		—		44,956
Subordinated debentures	—		—		—		70,310		70,310
Certificates of deposit	474,940		105,124		4,026		676		584,766
Operating leases	4,531		6,620		2,630		330		14,111
Total contractual cash obligations	$	575,927	$	140,244	$	6,656	$	71,316	$	794,143

Table of Contents

Off-Balance Sheet Commitments. We utilize off-balance sheet commitments in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of our customers and to reduce our own exposure to fluctuations in interest rates. These financial instruments include commitments to originate real estate, business and other loans held for investment, undisbursed loan funds, lines and letters of credit, and commitments to purchase loans and investment securities for portfolio. The contract or notional amounts of those instruments reflect the extent of involvement we have in particular classes of financial instruments.

Commitments to originate loans held for investment are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the commitment. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since some commitments expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. Undisbursed loan funds and unused lines of credit on home equity and commercial loans include committed funds not disbursed. Letters of credit are conditional commitments we issue to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. As of March 31, 2016, we had commitments to extend credit on existing lines and letters of credit of $382 million, compared to $583 million at December 31, 2015 and $403 million at March 31, 2015.

The following table summarizes our contractual commitments with off-balance sheet risk by expiration period at the date indicated:



	March 31, 2016
	Less than 1 year		1 - 5 years		3 - 5 years		More than 5 years		Total
	(in thousands)
Other commitments
Commercial and industrial	$	262,805	$	66,366	$	7,286	$	14,073	$	350,530
Construction	82,453		90,096		—		2,632		175,181
Home equity lines of credit	1,830		3,750		4,573		13,964		24,117
Standby letters of credit	14,942		—		—		—		14,942
All other	12,182		2,781		—		3,596		18,559
Total other commitments	$	374,212	$	162,993	$	11,859	$	34,265	$	583,329

Regulatory Capital Compliance

The Company and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory, and possibly additional discretionary, actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company’s and the Bank’s financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Company and the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Company’s and the Bank’s assets, liabilities and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Company’s and the Bank’s capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors.

Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Bank to maintain capital in order to meet certain capital ratios to be considered adequately capitalized or well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. As of the most recent formal notification from the Federal Reserve, the Bank was categorized as “well capitalized.” There are no conditions or events since that notification that management believes have changed the Bank’s categorization.

New comprehensive regulatory capital rules for U.S. banking organizations pursuant to the capital framework of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, generally referred to as “Basel III”, became effective

Table of Contents

for the Company and the Bank on January 1, 2015, subject to phase-in periods for certain of their components and other provisions. The most significant of the provisions of the New Capital Rules which applied to the Company and the Bank were as follows: the phase-out of trust preferred securities from Tier 1 capital, the higher risk-weighting of high volatility and past due real estate loans and the capital treatment of deferred tax assets and liabilities above certain thresholds.

As defined in applicable regulations and set forth in the table below, the Company and the Bank continue to exceed the “well capitalized” standards at the dates indicated:



	Actual				Minimum Required for Capital Adequacy Purposes				Required to be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Regulations
	Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio
	(dollars in thousands)
At March 31, 2016
Leverage Ratio
Bank	$	373,618	11.79	%	$	126,749	4.00	%	$	158,436	5.00	%
Consolidated	$	330,186	10.41	%	$	126,842	4.00	%	$	158,553	5.00	%

Common Equity Tier 1 to Risk-Weighted Assets
Bank	$	373,618	12.19	%	$	137,949	4.50	%	$	199,260	6.50	%
Consolidated	$	320,234	10.43	%	$	138,213	4.50	%	$	199,641	6.50	%

Tier 1 Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets
Bank	$	373,618	12.19	%	$	183,932	6.00	%	$	245,242	8.00	%
Consolidated	$	330,186	10.75	%	$	184,284	6.00	%	$	245,712	8.00	%

Total Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets
Bank	$	392,598	12.81	%	$	245,242	8.00	%	$	306,553	10.00	%
Consolidated	$	409,166	13.32	%	$	245,712	8.00	%	$	307,140	10.00	%
At December 31, 2015
Leverage Ratio
Bank	$	304,442	11.41	%	$	106,684	4.00	%	$	133,354	5.00	%
Consolidated	$	254,280	9.52	%	$	106,886	4.00	%	$	133,608	5.00	%

Common Equity Tier 1 to Risk-Weighted Assets
Bank	$	304,442	12.35	%	$	110,954	4.50	%	$	160,267	6.50	%
Consolidated	$	245,224	9.91	%	$	111,336	4.50	%	$	160,826	6.50	%

Tier 1 Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets
Bank	$	304,442	12.35	%	$	147,938	6.00	%	$	197,251	8.00	%
Consolidated	$	254,280	10.28	%	$	148,448	6.00	%	$	199,940	8.00	%

Total Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets
Bank	$	322,361	13.07	%	$	197,251	8.00	%	$	246,561	10.00	%
Consolidated	$	332,200	13.43	%	$	197,931	8.00	%	$	247,425	10.00	%
At March 31, 2015
Leverage Ratio
Bank	$	226,917	11.03	%	$	96,407	4.00	%	$	120,509	5.00	%

Table of Contents



Consolidated	$	226,917	9.43	%	$	96,280	4.00	%	120,350		5.00	%

Common Equity Tier 1 to Risk-Weighted Assets
Bank	$	265,765	11.46	%	$	104,370	4.50	%	$	150,757	6.50	%
Consolidated	$	216,917	9.32	%	$	104,780	4.50	%	$	151,349	6.50	%

Tier 1 Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets
Bank	$	265,765	11.46	%	$	139,161	6.00	%	$	185,547	8.00	%
Consolidated	$	226,917	9.75	%	$	139,706	6.00	%	186,275		8.00	%

Total Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets
Bank	$	279,834	12.07	%	$	185,547	8.00	%	$	231,934	10.00	%
Consolidated	$	300,987	12.93	%	$	186,275	8.00	%	$	232,844	10.00	%

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk

Management believes that there have been no material changes in our quantitative and qualitative information about market risk since December 31, 2015. For a complete discussion of our quantitative and qualitative market risk, see “Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk” in our 2015 Annual Report.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, an evaluation was carried out by our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.

Changes in Internal Controls

There have not been any changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter to which this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Table of Contents

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

The Corporation was named as a defendant in a lawsuit brought in California state court (Riverside County) entitled, Parshall v. Security California Bancorp, et al. This lawsuit was brought by Paul Parshall, a shareholder of SCAF, parent corporation of Security Bank of California. The lawsuit challenged the share price and other financial benefits to shareholders in the Company’s acquisition of SCAF, and was purportedly brought on behalf of a class of similarly-situated SCAF shareholders. No motion to certify a class action was filed. On March 1, 2016, Mr. Parshall filed paperwork with the court seeking to dismiss the litigation without prejudice. As of the date of this filing, the court is still in the process of considering and addressing Mr. Parshall’s request for dismissal.

In addition to the lawsuit described above, the Company is involved in legal proceedings occurring in the ordinary course of business. Management believes that neither the lawsuit described above nor any legal proceedings occurring in the ordinary course of business, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse impact on the results of operations or financial condition of the Company.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

There were no material changes to the risk factors as previously disclosed under Item 1A of our 2015 Annual Report.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

On June 25, 2012, the board of directors authorized its second stock repurchase program. Under the repurchase program, management is authorized to repurchase up to 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The program may be limited or terminated at any time without prior notice. The following table provides information with respect to purchases made by or on behalf of us or any “affiliated purchaser” (as defined in Rule 10b-18(a)(3) under the Exchange Act) of our common stock during the first quarter of 2016.



Month of Purchase	Total Number of shares purchased/ returned	Average price paid per share		Total number of shares repurchased as part of the publicly announced program	Maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the program at end of month
December-2015	—	—		—	762,545
January -2016	—	$	—	—	762,545
February-2016	—	—		—	762,545
March-2016	—	—		—	762,545
Total/Average	—	$	—	—	762,545

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

Table of Contents

Item 5. Other Information

None

Item 6. Exhibits



Exhibit 31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15(d)-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
Exhibit 31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15(d)-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
Exhibit 32		Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Exhibit 101.INS		XBRL Instance Document
Exhibit 101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
Exhibit 101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
Exhibit 101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definitions Linkbase Document
Exhibit 101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
Exhibit 101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.



	PACIFIC PREMIER BANCORP, INC.,

May 9, 2016		By:	/s/ Steve Gardner
Date			Steve Gardner
			President and Chief Executive Officer
			(principal executive officer)

May 9, 2016		By:	/s/ E. Allen Nicholson
Date			E. Allen Nicholson
			Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
			(principal financial and accounting officer)

Table of Contents



		Index to Exhibits
Exhibit 2.1		Agreement and Plan of Reorganization, dated as of September 30, 2015, by and between Pacific Premier Bancorp, Inc. and Security California Bancorp (1)
Exhibit 31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15(d)-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
Exhibit 31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15(d)-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
Exhibit 32		Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Exhibit 101.INS		XBRL Instance Document
Exhibit 101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
Exhibit 101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
Exhibit 101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definitions Linkbase Document
Exhibit 101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
Exhibit 101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

(1) Incorporated by reference from the Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 1, 2015 (File No. 151135243).

Pacific Premier Bancorp - 10-Q quarterly report FY2016 Q1

What is the market capitalization of a company?

DISCLAIMER

Contact

Links