Companies:
10,793
total market cap:
$134.237 T
Sign In
๐บ๐ธ
EN
English
$ USD
โฌ
EUR
๐ช๐บ
โน
INR
๐ฎ๐ณ
ยฃ
GBP
๐ฌ๐ง
$
CAD
๐จ๐ฆ
$
AUD
๐ฆ๐บ
$
NZD
๐ณ๐ฟ
$
HKD
๐ญ๐ฐ
$
SGD
๐ธ๐ฌ
Global ranking
Ranking by countries
America
๐บ๐ธ United States
๐จ๐ฆ Canada
๐ฒ๐ฝ Mexico
๐ง๐ท Brazil
๐จ๐ฑ Chile
Europe
๐ช๐บ European Union
๐ฉ๐ช Germany
๐ฌ๐ง United Kingdom
๐ซ๐ท France
๐ช๐ธ Spain
๐ณ๐ฑ Netherlands
๐ธ๐ช Sweden
๐ฎ๐น Italy
๐จ๐ญ Switzerland
๐ต๐ฑ Poland
๐ซ๐ฎ Finland
Asia
๐จ๐ณ China
๐ฏ๐ต Japan
๐ฐ๐ท South Korea
๐ญ๐ฐ Hong Kong
๐ธ๐ฌ Singapore
๐ฎ๐ฉ Indonesia
๐ฎ๐ณ India
๐ฒ๐พ Malaysia
๐น๐ผ Taiwan
๐น๐ญ Thailand
๐ป๐ณ Vietnam
Others
๐ฆ๐บ Australia
๐ณ๐ฟ New Zealand
๐ฎ๐ฑ Israel
๐ธ๐ฆ Saudi Arabia
๐น๐ท Turkey
๐ท๐บ Russia
๐ฟ๐ฆ South Africa
>> All Countries
Ranking by categories
๐ All assets by Market Cap
๐ Automakers
โ๏ธ Airlines
๐ซ Airports
โ๏ธ Aircraft manufacturers
๐ฆ Banks
๐จ Hotels
๐ Pharmaceuticals
๐ E-Commerce
โ๏ธ Healthcare
๐ฆ Courier services
๐ฐ Media/Press
๐ท Alcoholic beverages
๐ฅค Beverages
๐ Clothing
โ๏ธ Mining
๐ Railways
๐ฆ Insurance
๐ Real estate
โ Ports
๐ผ Professional services
๐ด Food
๐ Restaurant chains
โ๐ป Software
๐ Semiconductors
๐ฌ Tobacco
๐ณ Financial services
๐ข Oil&Gas
๐ Electricity
๐งช Chemicals
๐ฐ Investment
๐ก Telecommunication
๐๏ธ Retail
๐ฅ๏ธ Internet
๐ Construction
๐ฎ Video Game
๐ป Tech
๐ฆพ AI
>> All Categories
ETFs
๐ All ETFs
๐๏ธ Bond ETFs
๏ผ Dividend ETFs
โฟ Bitcoin ETFs
โข Ethereum ETFs
๐ช Crypto Currency ETFs
๐ฅ Gold ETFs & ETCs
๐ฅ Silver ETFs & ETCs
๐ข๏ธ Oil ETFs & ETCs
๐ฝ Commodities ETFs & ETNs
๐ Emerging Markets ETFs
๐ Small-Cap ETFs
๐ Low volatility ETFs
๐ Inverse/Bear ETFs
โฌ๏ธ Leveraged ETFs
๐ Global/World ETFs
๐บ๐ธ USA ETFs
๐บ๐ธ S&P 500 ETFs
๐บ๐ธ Dow Jones ETFs
๐ช๐บ Europe ETFs
๐จ๐ณ China ETFs
๐ฏ๐ต Japan ETFs
๐ฎ๐ณ India ETFs
๐ฌ๐ง UK ETFs
๐ฉ๐ช Germany ETFs
๐ซ๐ท France ETFs
โ๏ธ Mining ETFs
โ๏ธ Gold Mining ETFs
โ๏ธ Silver Mining ETFs
๐งฌ Biotech ETFs
๐ฉโ๐ป Tech ETFs
๐ Real Estate ETFs
โ๏ธ Healthcare ETFs
โก Energy ETFs
๐ Renewable Energy ETFs
๐ก๏ธ Insurance ETFs
๐ฐ Water ETFs
๐ด Food & Beverage ETFs
๐ฑ Socially Responsible ETFs
๐ฃ๏ธ Infrastructure ETFs
๐ก Innovation ETFs
๐ Semiconductors ETFs
๐ Aerospace & Defense ETFs
๐ Cybersecurity ETFs
๐ฆพ Artificial Intelligence ETFs
Watchlist
Account
This company appears to have been delisted
Reason: Acquired by Columbia Banking System
Last recorded trade on: October 3, 2025
Source:
https://www.columbiabankingsystem.com/news-market-data/press-releases/press-release/2025/Columbia-Banking-System-Completes-Acquisition-of-Pacific-Premier-Bancorp-and-Unifies-Columbia-Brand/default.aspx
Pacific Premier Bancorp
PPBI
#4399
Rank
$2.37 B
Marketcap
๐บ๐ธ
United States
Country
$24.49
Share price
0.00%
Change (1 day)
5.42%
Change (1 year)
๐ฆ Banks
๐ณ Financial services
Categories
Market cap
Revenue
Earnings
Price history
P/E ratio
P/S ratio
More
Price history
P/E ratio
P/S ratio
P/B ratio
Operating margin
EPS
Stock Splits
Dividends
Dividend yield
Shares outstanding
Fails to deliver
Cost to borrow
Total assets
Total liabilities
Total debt
Cash on Hand
Net Assets
Annual Reports (10-K)
Pacific Premier Bancorp
Quarterly Reports (10-Q)
Financial Year FY2016 Q2
Pacific Premier Bancorp - 10-Q quarterly report FY2016 Q2
Text size:
Small
Medium
Large
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
(X) QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended
June 30, 2016
OR
( ) TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from _______ to _______
Commission File Number 0-22193
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE
33-0743196
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S Employer Identification No.)
17901 VON KARMAN AVENUE, SUITE 1200, IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92614
(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)
(949) 864-8000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [ X ] No [_]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [X] No [_]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “accelerated filer”, “large accelerated filer”, and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Large accelerated filer
[ ]
Accelerated filer
[X]
Non-accelerated filer
(Do not check if a smaller
reporting company)
[ ]
Smaller reporting company
[ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). Yes [ ] No [X]
The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock as of
August 5, 2016
was
27,656,533
.
1
Table of Contents
PACIFIC PREMIER BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
INDEX
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
JUNE 30, 2016
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1 - Financial Statements
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition
3
Consolidated Statements of Operations
4
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
5
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity
6
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
7
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
8
Item 2 - Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
38
Item 3 - Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
71
Item 4 - Controls and Procedures
72
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
73
Item 1 - Legal Proceedings
73
Item 1A - Risk Factors
73
Item 2 - Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
73
Item 3 - Defaults Upon Senior Securities
73
Item 4 - Mine Safety Disclosures
73
Item 5 - Other Information
73
Item 6 - Exhibits
74
2
Table of Contents
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
PACIFIC PREMIER BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
(dollars in thousands)
(unaudited)
ASSETS
June 30,
2016
December 31,
2015
Cash and due from banks
$
15,444
$
14,935
Interest bearing deposits with financial institutions
169,855
63,482
Cash and cash equivalents
185,299
78,417
Interest bearing time deposits with financial institutions
3,944
1,972
Investments held to maturity, at amortized cost (fair value of $9,390 and $9,572 as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively)
9,292
9,642
Investment securities available for sale, at fair value
245,471
280,273
FHLB, FRB and other stock, at cost
26,984
22,292
Loans held for sale, at lower of cost or market
10,116
8,565
Loans held for investment
2,920,619
2,254,315
Allowance for loan losses
(18,955
)
(17,317
)
Loans held for investment, net
2,901,664
2,236,998
Accrued interest receivable
12,143
9,315
Other real estate owned
711
1,161
Premises and equipment
11,014
9,248
Deferred income taxes, net
16,552
11,511
Bank owned life insurance
39,824
39,245
Intangible assets
10,500
7,170
Goodwill
101,939
50,832
Other assets
23,200
24,005
Total Assets
$
3,598,653
$
2,790,646
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
LIABILITIES:
Deposit accounts:
Noninterest bearing checking
$
1,043,361
$
711,771
Interest-bearing:
Checking
168,669
134,999
Money market/savings
1,099,445
827,378
Retail certificates of deposit
420,673
365,911
Wholesale/brokered certificates of deposit
198,853
155,064
Total interest-bearing
1,887,640
1,483,352
Total deposits
2,931,001
2,195,123
FHLB advances and other borrowings
120,252
196,125
Subordinated debentures
70,310
70,310
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
36,460
30,108
Total Liabilities
3,158,023
2,491,666
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 1,000,000 authorized; none issued and outstanding
—
—
Common stock, $.01 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized; 27,650,533 shares at June 30, 2016 and 21,510,746 shares at December 31, 2015
273
215
Additional paid-in capital
342,388
221,487
Retained earnings
95,869
76,946
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax
2,100
332
Total Stockholder's Equity
440,630
298,980
Total Liabilities and Stockholder's Equity
$
3,598,653
$
2,790,646
Accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
PACIFIC PREMIER BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)
Three Months Ended
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2016
March 31, 2016
June 30, 2015
June 30, 2016
June 30, 2015
INTEREST INCOME
Loans
$
39,035
$
35,407
$
27,912
$
74,442
$
52,982
Investment securities and other interest-earning assets
1,839
2,098
2,158
3,937
3,715
Total interest income
40,874
37,505
30,070
78,379
56,697
INTEREST EXPENSE
Deposits
2,010
2,069
1,589
4,079
3,195
FHLB advances and other borrowings
324
325
407
649
782
Subordinated debentures
979
910
982
1,889
1,953
Total interest expense
3,313
3,304
2,978
6,617
5,930
Net Interest Provision Before Provision for Loan Losses
37,561
34,201
27,092
71,762
50,767
Provision for loan losses
1,589
1,120
1,833
2,709
3,663
Net Interest Income After Provision For Loan Losses
35,972
33,081
25,259
69,053
47,104
NONINTEREST INCOME
Loan servicing fees
302
327
393
629
737
Deposit fees
817
842
634
1,659
1,216
Net gain from sales of loans
2,124
1,906
2,721
4,030
2,721
Net gain from sales of investment securities
532
753
139
1,285
255
Other-than-temporary-impairment loss on investment securities
—
(207
)
—
(207
)
—
Other income
675
1,241
494
1,916
921
Total noninterest income
4,450
4,862
4,381
9,312
5,850
NONINTEREST EXPENSE
Compensation and benefits
13,095
11,770
9,171
24,865
18,416
Premises and occupancy
2,597
2,391
2,082
4,988
3,911
Data processing and communications
887
911
716
1,798
1,418
Other real estate owned operations, net
(15
)
8
56
(7
)
104
FDIC insurance premiums
401
382
363
783
677
Legal, audit and professional expense
446
865
661
1,311
1,182
Marketing expense
775
630
615
1,405
1,218
Office and postage expense
573
481
505
1,054
1,004
Loan expense
540
403
263
943
456
Deposit expense
1,196
1,019
982
2,215
1,787
Merger-related expense
497
3,119
—
3,616
3,992
CDI amortization
645
344
344
989
658
Other expense
2,058
1,324
1,456
3,382
2,860
Total noninterest expense
23,695
23,647
17,214
47,342
37,683
Net Income Before Income Taxes
16,727
14,296
12,426
31,023
15,271
Income tax
6,358
5,742
4,601
12,100
5,658
Net Income
$
10,369
$
8,554
$
7,825
$
18,923
$
9,613
EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic
$
0.38
$
0.33
$
0.36
$
0.72
$
0.46
Diluted
0.37
0.33
0.36
$
0.70
$
0.46
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING
Basic
27,378,930
25,555,654
21,493,641
26,467,292
20,796,655
Diluted
27,845,490
25,952,184
21,828,876
26,901,627
21,126,542
Accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
PACIFIC PREMIER BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(dollars in thousands)
(unaudited)
Three Months Ended
Six Months Ended
June 30,
March 31,
June 30,
June 30,
2016
2016
2015
2016
2015
Net income
$
10,369
$
8,554
$
7,825
$
18,923
$
9,613
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
Unrealized holding gains on securities arising during the period, net of income taxes (1)
947
1,565
(1,628
)
2,512
(793
)
Reclassification adjustment for net gain on sale of securities included in net income, net of income taxes (2)
(308
)
(436
)
(82
)
(744
)
(150
)
Net unrealized gain on securities, net of income taxes
639
1,129
(1,710
)
1,768
(943
)
Comprehensive income
$
11,008
$
9,683
$
6,115
$
20,691
$
8,670
______________________________
(1) Income tax (benefit) on the unrealized gains (losses) on securities was
$736,000
for the three months ended
June 30, 2016
,
$1.1 million
for the three months ended
March 31, 2016
,
$(1.1) million
for the three months ended
June 30, 2015
,
$1.8 million
for the six months ended
June 30, 2016
and
$(556,000)
for the six months ended
June 30, 2015
.
(2) Income tax (benefit) on the reclassification adjustment for net (gains) losses on sale of securities included in net income was
$224,000
for the three months ended
June 30, 2016
,
$317,000
for the three months ended
March 31, 2016
,
$57,000
for the three months ended
June 30, 2015
,
$541,000
for the six months ended
June 30, 2016
and
$105,000
for the six months ended
June 30, 2015
.
Accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
PACIFIC PREMIER BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 2016
AND
2015
(dollars in thousands)
(unaudited)
Common Stock
Shares
Common Stock
Additional Paid-in Capital
Accumulated Retained
Earnings
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
Total Stockholders’ Equity
Balance at December 31, 2015
21,570,746
$
215
$
221,487
$
76,946
$
332
$
298,980
Net income
—
—
—
18,923
—
18,923
Other comprehensive income
—
—
—
—
1,768
1,768
Share-based compensation expense
—
—
1,048
—
—
1,048
Issuance of restricted stock, net
218,236
—
—
—
—
—
Common stock issued
5,815,051
58
119,325
—
—
119,383
Exercise of stock options
46,500
—
528
—
—
528
Balance at June 30, 2016
27,650,533
$
273
$
342,388
$
95,869
$
2,100
$
440,630
Balance at December 31, 2014
16,903,884
$
169
$
147,474
$
51,431
$
518
$
199,592
Net income
—
—
—
9,613
—
9,613
Other comprehensive income
—
—
—
—
(943
)
(943
)
Share-based compensation expense
—
—
435
—
—
435
Common stock issued
4,480,645
45
72,207
—
—
72,252
Warrants exercised
125,196
1
688
—
—
689
Repurchase of common stock
(5,833
)
—
(93
)
—
—
(93
)
Exercise of stock options
6,666
—
48
—
—
48
Balance at June 30, 2015
21,510,558
$
215
$
220,759
$
61,044
$
(425
)
$
281,593
Accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
6
Table of Contents
PACIFIC PREMIER BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
Six Months Ended
June 30,
2016
2015
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income
$
18,923
$
9,613
Adjustments to net income:
Depreciation and amortization expense
1,348
1,244
Provision for loan losses
2,709
3,663
Share-based compensation expense
1,048
435
Loss on sale of or write down of other real estate owned
(18
)
92
Net amortization on securities held for sale, net
7,080
1,763
Net accretion of discounts/premiums for loans acquired and deferred loan fees/costs
(6,713
)
(967
)
Gain on sale of investment securities available for sale
(1,285
)
(255
)
Originations of loans held for sale
(44,463
)
—
Proceeds from the sales of and principal payments from loans held for sale
47,487
—
Gain on sale of loans
(4,030
)
(2,721
)
Deferred income tax benefit
(977
)
1,706
Change in accrued expenses and other liabilities, net
(1,700
)
(1,840
)
Income from bank owned life insurance, net
(579
)
(643
)
Amortization of core deposit intangible
989
—
Change in accrued interest receivable and other assets, net
5,904
(5,159
)
Net cash provided by operating activities
25,723
6,931
Cash flows from investing activities:
Increase in loans, net
(204,505
)
(154,121
)
Change in other real estate owned from sales and writedowns
468
234
Principal payments on securities available for sale
18,234
15,907
Purchase of securities available for sale
(5,135
)
(60,132
)
Proceeds from sale or maturity of securities available for sale
211,303
16,070
Proceeds from the sale of premises and equipment
6,987
(842
)
Purchases of premises and equipment
(5,745
)
—
Change in FHLB, FRB, and other stock, at cost
(4,692
)
(3,407
)
Cash acquired in acquisitions
40,303
2,961
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
57,218
(183,330
)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net increase in deposit accounts
99,286
129,139
Change in FHLB advances and other borrowings, net
(75,873
)
17,446
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of issuance cost
—
1,323
Proceeds from exercise of stock options and warrants
528
48
Warrants exercised
—
688
Repurchase of common stock
—
(93
)
Net cash provided by financing activities
23,941
148,551
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
106,882
(27,848
)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year
78,417
110,925
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year
$
185,299
$
83,077
Supplemental cash flow disclosures:
Interest paid
$
6,586
$
5,979
Income taxes paid
12,958
7,450
Assets acquired (liabilities assumed and capital created) in acquisitions (See Note 4):
Investment securities
190,254
53,752
FHLB and Other Stock
3,671
2,369
Loans
456,158
332,893
Core deposit intangible
4,319
2,903
Deferred income tax
7,069
4,794
Bank owned life insurance
—
11,276
Goodwill
51,106
27,882
Fixed assets
4,502
2,134
Other assets
5,610
2,402
Deposits
(636,591
)
(336,018
)
Other borrowings
—
(33,300
)
Other liabilities
(8,843
)
(1,796
)
Common stock and additional paid-in capital
(119,383
)
(70,929
)
Accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
7
Table of Contents
PACIFIC PREMIER BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2016
(UNAUDITED)
Note 1 - Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Pacific Premier Bancorp, Inc. (the “Corporation”) and its wholly owned subsidiaries, including Pacific Premier Bank (the “Bank”) (collectively, the “Company,” “we,” “our” or “us”). All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
In the opinion of management, the consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) necessary to present fairly the Company’s financial position as of
June 30, 2016
and
December 31, 2015
, the results of its operations and comprehensive income for the three months ended
June 30, 2016
,
March 31, 2016
and
June 30, 2015
and the six months ended
June 30, 2016
and
June 30, 2015
and the changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the
six
months ended
June 30, 2016
and
2015
. Operating results or comprehensive income for the
six
months ended
June 30, 2016
are not necessarily indicative of the results or comprehensive income that may be expected for any other interim period or the full year ending
December 31, 2016
.
Certain information and note disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2015
(the “
2015
Annual Report”).
The Company accounts for its investments in its wholly owned special purpose entity, PPBI Trust I, under the equity method whereby the subsidiary’s net earnings are recognized in the Company’s statement of operations.
Note 2 – Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
Accounting Standards Pending Adoption
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13,
Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments.
The amendments replace the incurred loss impairment methodology in current GAAP with a methodology that reflects expected credit lossses and requires consideration of a broader range of reasonable and supportable information to inform credit loss estimates
.
For public business entities, the amendment is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019 and interim period within those annual periods. The Company is currently evaluating the effects of ASU 2016-13 on its financial statements and disclosures.
8
Table of Contents
Note 3 – Significant Accounting Policies
Certain Acquired Loans:
As part of business acquisitions, the Bank acquires certain loans that have shown evidence of credit deterioration since origination. These acquired loans are recorded at the allocated fair value, such that there is no carryover of the seller’s allowance for loan losses. Such acquired loans are accounted for individually. The Bank estimates the amount and timing of expected cash flows for each purchased loan, and the expected cash flows in excess of the allocated fair value is recorded as interest income over the remaining life of the loan (accretable yield). The excess of the loan’s contractual principal and interest over expected cash flows is not recorded (non-accretable difference). Over the life of the loan, expected cash flows continue to be estimated. If the present value of expected cash flows is less than the carrying amount, a loss is recorded through the allowance for loan losses. If the present value of expected cash flows is greater than the carrying amount, it is recognized as part of future interest income.
Goodwill and Core Deposit Intangible
: Goodwill is generally determined as the excess of the fair value of the consideration transferred, plus the fair value of any noncontrolling interests in the acquiree, over the fair value of the net assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date. Goodwill and intangible assets acquired in a purchase business combination and determined to have an indefinite useful life are not amortized, but tested for impairment at least annually or more frequently if events and circumstances exist that indicate the necessity for such impairment tests to be performed. The Company has selected December 31 as the date to perform the annual impairment test. Intangible assets with definite useful lives are amortized over their estimated useful lives to their estimated residual values. Goodwill is the only intangible asset with an indefinite life on our balance sheet.
Core deposit intangible assets arising from whole bank acquisitions are amortized on a straight-line amortization method over their estimated useful lives, which range from
6
to
10 years
.
Use of Estimates:
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The allowance for loan losses, the fair value of stock-based compensation awards, the fair values of financial instruments and the status of contingencies are particularly subject to change.
Note 4 – Acquisitions
The Company accounted for the following transactions under the acquisition method of accounting which requires purchased assets and liabilities assumed to be recorded at their respective fair values at the date of acquisition. The Company determined the fair value of the loans, core deposit intangible, securities and deposits with the assistance of third party valuations.
The estimated fair values in these acquisitions are subject to refinement as additional information relative to the closing date fair values become available through the measurement period, which can extend for up to
one year
after the closing date of the transaction. While additional significant changes to the closing date fair values are not expected, any information relative to the changes in these fair values will be evaluated to determine if such changes are due to events and circumstances that existed as of the acquisition date. During the measurement period, any such changes will be recorded as part of the closing date fair value.
9
Table of Contents
Security California Bancorp Acquisition
On January 31, 2016, the Company completed its acquisition of Security California Bancorp (“SCAF”) whereby we acquired
$715 million
in total assets,
$456 million
in loans and
$637 million
in total deposits. Under the terms of the merger agreement, each share of SCAF common stock was converted into the right to receive
0.9629
shares of the Corporation’s common stock. The value of the total deal consideration was
$120 million
, which includes
$788,000
of aggregate cash consideration to the holders of SCAF stock options and the issuance of
5,815,051
shares of the Corporation’s common stock, valued at
$119.4 million
based on a closing stock price of
$20.53
per share on January 29, 2016.
SCAF was the holding company of Security Bank of California, a Riverside, California, based state-chartered bank with
six
branches located in Riverside County, San Bernardino County and Orange County.
Goodwill in the amount of
$51.1 million
was recognized in the SCAF acquisition. Goodwill represents the future economic benefits arising from net assets acquired that are not individually identified and separately recognized and is attributable to synergies expected to be derived from the combination of the
two
entities. Goodwill recognized in this transaction is not deductible for income tax purposes.
The following table represents the assets acquired and liabilities assumed of SCAF as of January 31, 2016 and the provisional fair value adjustments and amounts recorded by the Company in 2016 under the acquisition method of accounting:
SCAF
Book Value
Fair Value
Adjustments
Fair
Value
ASSETS ACQUIRED
(in thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents
$
40,947
$
—
$
40,947
Interest bearing deposits with financial institutions
1,972
—
1,972
Investment securities
191,881
(1,627
)
190,254
Loans, gross
467,197
(11,039
)
456,158
Allowance for loan losses
(7,399
)
7,399
—
Fixed assets
5,335
(833
)
4,502
Core deposit intangible
493
3,826
4,319
Deferred tax assets
5,618
1,451
7,069
Other assets
10,589
(1,308
)
9,281
Total assets acquired
$
716,633
$
(2,131
)
$
714,502
LIABILITIES ASSUMED
Deposits
$
636,450
$
141
$
636,591
Other Liabilities
9,063
(220
)
8,843
Total liabilities assumed
645,513
(79
)
645,434
Excess of assets acquired over liabilities assumed
$
71,120
$
(2,052
)
69,068
Consideration paid
120,174
Goodwill recognized
$
51,106
The fair values are preliminary estimates and are subject to adjustment for up to one year after the merger date or when additional information relative to the closing date fair values becomes available and such information is considered final, whichever is earlier. In the second quarter of 2016, the Company made a
$146,000
adjustment to fixed assets and goodwill.
10
Table of Contents
Independence Bank Acquisition
On January 26, 2015, the Company completed its acquisition of Independence Bank (“IDPK”) in exchange for consideration valued at
$79.8 million
, which consisted of
$6.1 million
of cash consideration for IDPK common stockholders,
$1.5 million
of aggregate cash consideration to the holders of IDPK stock options and warrants,
$1.3 million
fair market value of warrants assumed and the issuance of
4,480,645
shares of the Corporation’s common stock, which was valued at
$70.9 million
based on the closing stock price of the Corporation’s common stock on January 26, 2015 of
$15.83
per share.
IDPK was a Newport Beach, California based state-chartered bank. The acquisition was an opportunity for the Company to strengthen its competitive position as one of the premier community banks headquartered in Southern California. Additionally, the IDPK acquisition enhanced and connected the Company’s footprint in Southern California.
Goodwill in the amount of
$27.9 million
was recognized in the IDPK acquisition. Goodwill represents the future economic benefits arising from net assets acquired that are not individually identified and separately recognized and is attributable to synergies expected to be derived from the combination of the
two
entities. Goodwill recognized in this transaction is not deductible for income tax purposes.
11
Table of Contents
The following table represents the assets acquired and liabilities assumed of IDPK as of January 26, 2015 and the fair value adjustments and amounts recorded by the Company in 2015 under the acquisition method of accounting:
IDPK
Book Value
Fair Value
Adjustments
Fair
Value
(in thousands)
ASSETS ACQUIRED
Cash and cash equivalents
$
10,486
$
—
$
10,486
Investment securities
56,503
(382
)
56,121
Loans, gross
339,502
(6,609
)
332,893
Allowance for loan losses
(3,301
)
3,301
—
Deferred income taxes
5,266
(472
)
4,794
Bank owned life insurance
11,276
—
11,276
Core deposit intangible
904
1,999
2,903
Other assets
3,756
780
4,536
Total assets acquired
$
424,392
$
(1,383
)
$
423,009
LIABILITIES ASSUMED
Deposits
$
335,685
$
333
$
336,018
FHLB advances
33,300
—
33,300
Other liabilities
1,916
(120
)
1,796
Total liabilities assumed
370,901
213
371,114
Excess of assets acquired over liabilities assumed
$
53,491
$
(1,596
)
51,895
Consideration paid
79,777
Goodwill recognized
$
27,882
For loans acquired from SCAF and IDPK, the contractual amounts due, expected cash flows to be collected, interest component and fair value as of the respective acquisition dates were as follows:
Acquired Loans
SCAF
IDPK
(in thousands)
Contractual amounts due
$
539,806
$
453,987
Cash flows not expected to be collected
2,765
3,795
Expected cash flows
537,041
450,192
Interest component of expected cash flows
80,883
117,299
Fair value of acquired loans
$
456,158
$
332,893
In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, there was no carryover of the allowance for loan losses that had been previously recorded by SCAF or IDPK.
12
Table of Contents
The operating results of the Company for the
six
months ending
June 30, 2016
include the operating results of SCAF and IDPK since their respective acquisition dates. The operating results of the Company for the
six
months ending
June 30, 2015
include the operating results of IDPK since its acquisition date. The following table presents the net interest and other income, net income and earnings per share as if the acquisitions of SCAF and IDPK were effective as of January 1, 2016 and 2015. There were no material, nonrecurring adjustments to the pro forma net interest and other income, net income and earnings per share presented below:
Six Months Ended June 30,
2016
2015
(dollars in thousands)
Net interest and other income
$
80,512
$
67,729
Net income
16,952
11,137
Basic earnings per share
0.62
0.41
Diluted earnings per share
0.61
0.40
13
Table of Contents
Note 5 – Investment Securities
The amortized cost and estimated fair value of securities were as follows:
June 30, 2016
Amortized
Cost
Unrealized
Gain
Unrealized
Loss
Estimated
Fair Value
(in thousands)
Available-for-sale:
Municipal bonds
$
115,755
$
3,044
$
—
$
118,799
Collateralized mortgage obligation
22,570
274
—
22,844
Mortgage-backed securities
103,512
604
(288
)
103,828
Total available-for-sale
241,837
3,922
(288
)
245,471
Held-to-maturity:
Mortgage-backed securities
8,076
98
—
8,174
Other
1,216
—
—
1,216
Total held-to-maturity
9,292
98
—
9,390
Total securities
$
251,129
$
4,020
$
(288
)
$
254,861
December 31, 2015
Amortized
Cost
Unrealized
Gain
Unrealized
Loss
Estimated
Fair Value
(in thousands)
Available-for-sale:
Municipal bonds
$
128,546
$
1,796
$
(97
)
$
130,245
Collateralized mortgage obligation
24,722
4
(183
)
24,543
Mortgage-backed securities
126,443
153
(1,111
)
125,485
Total available-for-sale
279,711
1,953
(1,391
)
$
280,273
Held-to-maturity:
Mortgage-backed securities
8,400
—
(70
)
8,330
Other
1,242
—
—
1,242
Total held-to-maturity
9,642
—
(70
)
9,572
Total securities
$
289,353
$
1,953
$
(1,461
)
$
289,845
At
June 30, 2016
, mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”) with an estimated par value of
$59.6 million
and a fair value of
$62.1 million
were pledged as collateral for the Bank’s
three
reverse repurchase agreements which totaled
$28.5 million
and homeowner’s association (“HOA”) reverse repurchase agreements which totaled
$16.8 million
.
The Company reviews individual securities classified as available-for-sale to determine whether a decline in fair value below the amortized cost basis is temporary because (i) those declines were due to interest rate changes and not to a deterioration in the creditworthiness of the issuers of those investment securities, and (ii) we have the ability to hold those securities until there is a recovery in their values or until their maturity.
If it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to contractual terms of the debt security not impaired at acquisition, an other-than-temporary ("OTTI") shall be considered to have occurred. If an OTTI occurs, the cost basis of the security will be written down to its fair value as the new cost basis and the write down accounted for as a realized loss.
14
Table of Contents
The Company did not realize any OTTI losses for the three months ended
June 30, 2016
or
June 30, 2015
. The Company realized OTTI losses of
$207,000
for the three months ended March 31, 2016. The OTTI loss relates to a CRA investment purchased in June of 2014 with a par value of
$50
, and a book value of
$500,000
. In March of 2016 the shareholders of the investment voted to approve a sale of the institution at a per share acquisition price less the Bank's book value, with an expected closing by mid-2016. As a result, the Bank's current holdings were written down and the loss recognized.
During the six months ended
June 30, 2016
, the Company realized OTTI losses of
$207,000
. The Company did not realize any OTTI losses for the six months ended
June 30, 2015
.
During the three months ended
June 30, 2016
,
March 31, 2016
and
June 30, 2015
, the Company recognized gross gains on sales of available-for-sale securities in the amount of
$532,000
,
$762,000
and
$146,000
, respectively. During the three months ended
June 30, 2016
, the Company did not recognize any gross losses on the sales of available-for sale securities. During the three months ended
March 31, 2016
and
June 30, 2015
, the Company recognized gross losses on sales of available-for-sale securities in the amount of
$9,000
and
$7,000
, respectively. The Company had net proceeds from the sale of available-for-sale securities of
$21.1 million
and
$186 million
and
$7.3 million
during the three months ended
June 30, 2016
,
March 31, 2016
and
June 30, 2015
, respectively.
During the six months ended
June 30, 2016
and
June 30, 2015
, the Company recognized gross gains on sales of available-for-sale securities in the amount of
$1.3 million
and
$264,000
. During the six months ended
June 30, 2016
and
June 30, 2015
, the Company recognized gross losses on sales of available-for-sale securities in the amount of
$9,000
and
$9,000
. The Company had net proceeds from the sale of available-for-sale securities of
$207 million
and
$16.1 million
during the six months ended
June 30, 2016
and
June 30, 2015
, respectively.
The table below shows the number, fair value and gross unrealized holding losses of the Company’s investment securities by investment category and length of time that the securities have been in a continuous loss position.
June 30, 2016
Less than 12 months
12 months or Longer
Total
Number
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Holding
Losses
Number
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Holding
Losses
Number
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Holding
Losses
(dollars in thousands)
Available-for-sale:
Mortgage-backed securities
9
16,209
(77
)
8
21,940
(211
)
17
38,149
(288
)
Total securities
9
$
16,209
$
(77
)
8
$
21,940
$
(211
)
17
$
38,149
$
(288
)
15
Table of Contents
December 31, 2015
Less than 12 months
12 months or Longer
Total
Number
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Holding
Losses
Number
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Holding
Losses
Number
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Holding
Losses
(dollars in thousands)
Available-for-sale:
Municipal bonds
32
$
15,516
$
(61
)
6
$
3,349
$
(36
)
38
$
18,865
$
(97
)
Collateralized mortgage obligation
5
22,771
(183
)
—
—
—
5
22,771
(183
)
Mortgage-backed securities
34
83,488
(679
)
3
12,935
(432
)
37
96,423
(1,111
)
Total securities available-for-sale
71
121,775
(923
)
9
16,284
(468
)
80
138,059
(1,391
)
Held-to-maturity:
Mortgage-backed securities
1
8,330
(70
)
—
—
—
1
8,330
(70
)
Total securities held-to-maturity
1
8,330
(70
)
—
—
—
1
8,330
(70
)
Total securities
72
$
130,105
$
(993
)
9
$
16,284
$
(468
)
81
$
146,389
$
(1,461
)
The amortized cost and estimated fair value of investment securities at
June 30, 2016
, by contractual maturity are shown in the table below.
One Year
or Less
More than One
Year to Five Years
More than Five Years
to Ten Years
More than
Ten Years
Total
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
(in thousands)
Available-for-sale:
Municipal bonds
$
1,415
$
1,416
$
28,380
$
28,806
$
37,618
$
38,956
$
48,342
$
49,621
$
115,755
$
118,799
Collateralized mortgage obligation
—
—
—
—
—
—
22,570
22,844
22,570
22,844
Mortgage-backed securities
—
—
—
—
20,961
21,143
82,551
82,685
103,512
103,828
Total securities available-for-sale
1,415
1,416
28,380
28,806
58,579
60,099
153,463
155,150
241,837
245,471
Held-to-maturity:
Mortgage-backed securities
—
—
—
—
—
—
8,076
8,174
8,076
8,174
Other
—
—
—
—
—
—
1,216
1,216
1,216
1,216
Total securities held-to-maturity
—
—
—
—
—
—
9,292
9,390
9,292
9,390
Total securities
$
1,415
$
1,416
$
28,380
$
28,806
$
58,579
$
60,099
$
162,755
$
164,540
$
251,129
$
254,861
16
Table of Contents
Unrealized gains and losses on investment securities available for sale are recognized in stockholders’ equity as accumulated other comprehensive income or loss. At
June 30, 2016
, the Company had accumulated other comprehensive income of
$3.6 million
, or
$2.1 million
net of tax, compared to accumulated other comprehensive income of
$562,000
, or
$332,000
net of tax, at
December 31, 2015
.
FHLB, FRB and other stock
At
June 30, 2016
, the Company had
$14.4 million
in Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) stock,
$7.9 million
in Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (“FRB”) stock, and
$4.7 million
in other stock, all carried at cost. During the three months ended
June 30, 2016
and
December 31, 2015
, FHLB did not repurchase any of the Company’s excess FHLB stock through their stock repurchase program. The Company evaluates its investments in FHLB and other stock for impairment periodically, including their capital adequacy and overall financial condition. No impairment losses have been recorded through
June 30, 2016
.
17
Table of Contents
Note 6 – Loans Held for Investment
The following table sets forth the composition of our loan portfolio in dollar amounts at the dates indicated:
June 30, 2016
December 31, 2015
(in thousands)
Business loans:
Commercial and industrial
$
508,141
$
309,741
Franchise
403,855
328,925
Commercial owner occupied (1)
443,060
294,726
SBA
86,076
62,256
Warehouse facilities
—
143,200
Real estate loans:
Commercial non-owner occupied
526,362
421,583
Multi-family
613,573
429,003
One-to-four family (2)
106,538
80,050
Construction
215,786
169,748
Land
18,341
18,340
Other loans
5,822
5,111
Total gross loans (3)
2,927,554
2,262,683
Less Loans held for sale, net
10,116
8,565
Total gross loans held for investment
2,917,438
2,254,118
Less:
Deferred loan origination costs/(fees) and premiums/(discounts), net
3,181
197
Allowance for loan losses
(18,955
)
(17,317
)
Loans held for investment, net
$
2,901,664
$
2,236,998
______________________________
(1) Majority secured by real estate.
(2) Includes second trust deeds.
(3) Total gross loans for June 30, 2016 are net of the unaccreted mark-to-market discounts of
$12.7 million
.
From time to time, we may purchase or sell loans in order to manage concentrations, maximize interest income, change risk profiles, improve returns and generate liquidity.
The Company makes residential and commercial loans held for investment to customers located primarily in California. Consequently, the underlying collateral for our loans and a borrower’s ability to repay may be impacted unfavorably by adverse changes in the economy and real estate market in the region.
Under applicable laws and regulations, the Bank may not make secured loans to one borrower in excess of
25%
of the Bank’s unimpaired capital plus surplus and likewise in excess of
15%
for unsecured loans. These loans-to-one borrower limitations result in a dollar limitation of
$128.4 million
for secured loans and
$77.0 million
for unsecured loans at
June 30, 2016
. At
June 30, 2016
, the Bank’s largest aggregate outstanding balance of loans to one borrower was
$40.0 million
of secured credit.
18
Table of Contents
Purchased Credit Impaired
The following table provides a summary of the Company’s principal investment in purchased credit impaired loans, acquired from Canyon National Bank, IDPK and SCAF as of the period indicated:
June 30, 2016
Canyon National
IDPK
SCAF
Total
(in thousands)
Business loans:
Commercial and industrial
$
87
$
159
$
4,162
$
4,408
Commercial owner occupied
517
—
1,105
1,622
Real estate loans:
Commercial non-owner occupied
879
626
—
1,505
Other loans
—
—
418
418
Total purchase credit impaired
$
1,483
$
785
$
5,685
$
7,953
On the acquisition date, the amount by which the undiscounted expected cash flows of the purchased credit impaired loans exceed the estimated fair value of the loan is the “accretable yield.” The accretable yield is measured at each financial reporting date and represents the difference between the remaining undiscounted expected cash flows and the current carrying value of the purchased credit impaired loan. At
June 30, 2016
, the Company had
$8.0 million
of purchased credit impaired loans, of which
$580,000
were placed on nonaccrual status.
The following table summarizes the accretable yield on the purchased credit impaired loans for the
six
months ended
June 30, 2016
:
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2016
Canyon National
IDPK
SCAF
Total
(in thousands)
Balance at the beginning of period
$
1,130
$
1,596
$
—
$
2,726
Accretable yield at acquisition
—
—
788
788
Accretion
(98
)
(8
)
(170
)
(276
)
Disposals and other
(30
)
(419
)
—
(449
)
Change in accretable yield
—
192
—
192
Balance at the end of period
$
1,002
$
1,361
$
618
$
2,981
19
Table of Contents
Impaired Loans
The following tables provide a summary of the Company’s investment in impaired loans as of the period indicated:
Impaired Loans
Contractual
Unpaid Principal Balance
Recorded Investment
With Specific Allowance
Without Specific Allowance
Specific Allowance for Impaired Loans
(in thousands)
June 30, 2016
Business loans:
Commercial and industrial
$
1,519
$
1,051
$
—
$
1,051
$
—
Franchise
2,225
1,461
1,461
—
731
Commercial owner occupied
865
486
—
486
—
SBA
1,394
328
—
329
—
Real estate loans:
Commercial non-owner occupied
—
—
—
—
—
One-to-four family
181
137
—
137
—
Land
37
18
—
18
—
Totals
$
6,221
$
3,481
$
1,461
$
2,021
$
731
Impaired Loans
Contractual
Unpaid Principal Balance
Recorded Investment
With Specific Allowance
Without Specific Allowance
Specific Allowance for Impaired Loans
Average Recorded Investment
Interest Income Recognized
(in thousands)
December 31, 2015
Business loans:
Commercial and industrial
$
578
$
313
$
—
$
313
$
—
$
90
$
29
Franchise
2,394
1,630
1,461
169
731
1,386
3
Commercial owner occupied
883
536
—
536
—
415
67
Real estate loans:
Commercial non-owner occupied
329
214
—
214
—
430
19
One-to-four family
98
70
—
70
—
204
5
Land
37
21
—
21
—
13
—
Totals
$
4,319
$
2,784
$
1,461
$
1,323
$
731
$
2,538
$
123
20
Table of Contents
Three Months Ended
Six Months Ended
Average Recorded Investment
Interest Income Recognized
Average Recorded Investment
Interest Income Recognized
(in thousands)
June 30, 2016
Business loans:
Commercial and industrial
$
350
$
8
$
329
$
13
Franchise
1,461
24
1,546
51
Commercial owner occupied
494
9
506
18
SBA
247
4
135
4
Real estate loans:
Commercial non-owner occupied
—
—
71
2
One-to-four family
393
5
322
10
Land
19
1
19
1
Totals
$
2,964
$
51
$
2,928
$
99
Three Months Ended
Six Months Ended
Average Recorded Investment
Interest Income Recognized
Average Recorded Investment
Interest Income Recognized
(in thousands)
June 30, 2015
Business loans:
Commercial and industrial
$
74
$
—
$
4
$
—
Franchise
1,723
—
1,171
—
Commercial owner occupied
373
15
378
22
Real estate loans:
Commercial non-owner occupied
446
21
456
33
One-to-four family
222
10
228
15
Land
8
—
4
—
Totals
$
2,846
$
46
$
2,241
$
70
The Company considers a loan to be impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement or it is determined that the likelihood of the Company receiving all scheduled payments, including interest, when due is remote. The Company has no commitments to lend additional funds to debtors whose loans have been impaired.
The Company reviews loans for impairment when the loan is classified as substandard or worse, delinquent 90 days, or determined by management to be collateral dependent, or when the borrower files bankruptcy or is granted a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”). Measurement of impairment is based on the loan’s expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, measured by reference to an observable market value, if one exists, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is deemed collateral dependent. All loans are generally charged-off at such time the loan is classified as a loss. Valuation allowances are determined on a loan-by-loan basis or by aggregating loans with similar risk characteristics.
21
Table of Contents
The following table provides additional detail on the components of impaired loans at the period end indicated:
June 30, 2016
December 31, 2015
(in thousands)
Nonaccruing loans
$
3,481
$
2,736
Accruing loans
—
48
Total impaired loans
$
3,481
$
2,784
When loans are placed on nonaccrual status all accrued interest is reversed from earnings. Payments received on nonaccrual loans are generally applied as a reduction to the loan principal balance. If the likelihood of further loss is remote, the Company will recognize interest on a cash basis only. Loans may be returned to accruing status if the Company believes that all remaining principal and interest is fully collectible and there has been at least three months of sustained repayment performance since the loan was placed on nonaccrual.
The Company does not accrue interest on loans 90 days or more past due or when, in the opinion of management, there is reasonable doubt as to the collection of interest. The Company had impaired loans on nonaccrual status of
$3.5 million
at
June 30, 2016
and
$2.7 million
at
December 31, 2015
. The Company had
no
loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing at
June 30, 2016
and
December 31, 2015
.
The Company had
no
TDRs at
June 30, 2016
and
December 31, 2015
. In addition, the Company had no foreclosed residential real estate property or a recorded investment in consumer mortgage loans collateralized by residential real estate property for which formal foreclosure proceedings were in process as of
June 30, 2016
.
Concentration of Credit Risk
As of
June 30, 2016
, the Company’s loan portfolio was collateralized by various forms of real estate and business assets located predominately in California. The Company’s loan portfolio contains concentrations of credit in multi-family real estate, commercial non-owner occupied real estate and commercial owner occupied business loans. The Bank maintains policies approved by the Bank’s Board of Directors (the “Bank Board”) that address these concentrations and continues to diversify its loan portfolio through loan originations, purchases and sales to meet approved concentration levels. While management believes that the collateral presently securing these loans is adequate, there can be no assurances that a significant deterioration in the California real estate market or economy would not expose the Company to significantly greater credit risk.
Credit Quality and Credit Risk Management
The Company’s credit quality is maintained and credit risk managed in
two
distinct areas. The first is the loan origination process, wherein the Bank underwrites credit quality and chooses which risks it is willing to accept. The second is in the ongoing oversight of the loan portfolio, where existing credit risk is measured and monitored, and where performance issues are dealt with in a timely and comprehensive fashion.
The Company maintains a comprehensive credit policy which sets forth minimum and maximum tolerances for key elements of loan risk. The policy identifies and sets forth specific guidelines for analyzing each of the loan products the Company offers from both an individual and portfolio wide basis. The credit policy is reviewed annually by the Bank Board. The Bank’s seasoned underwriters ensure all key risk factors are analyzed with nearly all underwriting including a comprehensive global cash flow analysis of the prospective borrowers.
Credit risk is managed within the loan portfolio by the Company’s Portfolio Management department based on a comprehensive credit and investment review policy. This policy requires a program of financial data collection and analysis, comprehensive loan reviews, property and/or business inspections and monitoring of
22
Table of Contents
portfolio concentrations and trends. The Portfolio Management department also monitors asset-based lines of credit, loan covenants and other conditions associated with the Company’s business loans as a means to help identify potential credit risk. Individual loans, excluding the homogeneous loan portfolio, are reviewed at least biennially, and in most cases more often, including the assignment of a risk grade.
Risk grades are based on a
six
-grade Pass scale, along with Special Mention, Substandard, Doubtful and Loss classifications as such classifications are defined by the regulatory agencies. The assignment of risk grades allows the Company to, among other things, identify the risk associated with each credit in the portfolio, and to provide a basis for estimating credit losses inherent in the portfolio. Risk grades are reviewed regularly by the Company’s Credit and Portfolio Review committee, and are reviewed annually by an independent third-party, as well as by regulatory agencies during scheduled examinations.
The following provides brief definitions for risk grades assigned to loans in the portfolio:
•
Pass classifications represent assets with a level of credit quality which contain no well-defined deficiency or weakness.
•
Special Mention assets do not currently expose the Bank to a sufficient risk to warrant classification in one of the adverse categories, but possess correctable deficiencies or potential weaknesses deserving management’s close attention.
•
Substandard assets are inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. These assets are characterized by the distinct possibility that the Bank will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. OREO acquired from foreclosure is also classified as substandard.
•
Doubtful credits have all the weaknesses inherent in substandard credits, with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable.
•
Loss assets are those that are considered uncollectible and of such little value that their continuance as assets is not warranted. Amounts classified as loss are promptly charged off.
The Portfolio Management department also manages loan performance risks, collections, workouts, bankruptcies and foreclosures. Loan performance risks are mitigated by our portfolio managers acting promptly and assertively to address problem credits when they are identified. Collection efforts are commenced immediately upon non-payment, and the portfolio managers seek to promptly determine the appropriate steps to minimize the Company’s risk of loss. When foreclosure will maximize the Company’s recovery for a non-performing loan, the portfolio managers will take appropriate action to initiate the foreclosure process.
When a loan is graded as special mention or substandard or doubtful, the Company obtains an updated valuation of the underlying collateral. If the credit in question is also identified as impaired, a valuation allowance, if necessary, is established against such loan or a loss is recognized by a charge to the allowance for loan losses (“ALLL”) if management believes that the full amount of the Company’s recorded investment in the loan is no longer collectable. The Company typically continues to obtain or confirm updated valuations of underlying collateral for special mention and classified loans on an annual basis in order to have the most current indication of fair value. Once a loan is identified as impaired, an analysis of the underlying collateral is performed at least quarterly, and corresponding changes in any related valuation allowance are made or balances deemed to be fully uncollectable are charged-off.
23
Table of Contents
The following tables stratify the loan portfolio by the Company’s internal risk grading system as well as certain other information concerning the credit quality of the loan portfolio as of the periods indicated:
Credit Risk Grades
Pass
Special
Mention
Substandard
Doubtful
Total Gross
Loans
June 30, 2016
(in thousands)
Business loans:
Commercial and industrial
$
498,556
$
3,694
$
5,891
$
—
$
508,141
Franchise
402,394
—
—
1,461
403,855
Commercial owner occupied
432,542
1,413
9,105
—
443,060
SBA
85,747
—
329
—
86,076
Real estate loans:
Commercial non-owner occupied
522,108
—
4,254
—
526,362
Multi-family
611,143
—
2,430
—
613,573
One-to-four family
105,619
—
919
—
106,538
Construction
215,786
—
—
—
215,786
Land
18,323
—
18
—
18,341
Other loans
5,404
—
418
—
5,822
Totals
$
2,897,622
$
5,107
$
23,364
$
1,461
$
2,927,554
Credit Risk Grades
Pass
Special
Mention
Substandard
Doubtful
Total Gross
Loans
December 31, 2015
(in thousands)
Business loans:
Commercial and industrial
$
306,513
$
73
$
3,155
$
—
$
309,741
Franchise
327,295
—
169
1,461
328,925
Commercial owner occupied
286,270
627
7,829
—
294,726
SBA
62,256
—
—
—
62,256
Warehouse facilities
143,200
—
—
—
143,200
Real estate loans:
Commercial non-owner occupied
418,917
—
2,666
—
421,583
Multi-family
425,616
—
3,387
—
429,003
One-to-four family
78,997
—
1,053
—
80,050
Construction
169,748
—
—
—
169,748
Land
18,319
—
21
—
18,340
Other loans
5,111
—
—
—
5,111
Totals
$
2,242,242
$
700
$
18,280
$
1,461
$
2,262,683
24
Table of Contents
The following tables set forth delinquencies in the Company’s loan portfolio at the dates indicated:
Days Past Due
Non-
Current
30-59
60-89
90+
Total
Accruing
June 30, 2016
(in thousands)
Business loans:
Commercial and industrial
$
506,965
$
1,144
$
—
$
32
$
508,141
$
1,220
Franchise
402,394
—
—
1,461
403,855
1,461
Commercial owner occupied
443,060
—
—
—
443,060
486
SBA
85,830
—
—
246
86,076
329
Real estate loans:
Commercial non-owner occupied
523,875
—
2,487
—
526,362
411
Multi-family
613,573
—
—
—
613,573
—
One-to-four family
106,498
—
—
40
106,538
137
Construction
215,786
—
—
—
215,786
—
Land
18,323
—
—
18
18,341
18
Other loans
5,822
—
—
—
5,822
—
Totals
$
2,922,126
$
1,144
$
2,487
$
1,797
$
2,927,554
$
4,062
Days Past Due
Non-
Current
30-59
60-89
90+
Total
Accruing
December 31, 2015
(in thousands)
Business loans:
Commercial and industrial
$
309,464
$
20
$
—
$
257
$
309,741
$
463
Franchise
327,295
—
—
1,630
328,925
1,630
Commercial owner occupied
294,371
—
355
—
294,726
536
SBA
62,256
—
—
—
62,256
—
Warehouse facilities
143,200
—
—
—
143,200
—
Real estate loans:
Commercial non-owner occupied
421,369
214
—
—
421,583
1,164
Multi-family
429,003
—
—
—
429,003
—
One-to-four family
79,915
89
—
46
80,050
155
Construction
169,748
—
—
—
169,748
—
Land
18,319
—
—
21
18,340
21
Other loans
5,111
—
—
—
5,111
1
Totals
$
2,260,051
$
323
$
355
$
1,954
$
2,262,683
$
3,970
Note 7 – Allowance for Loan Losses
The Company’s ALLL covers estimated credit losses on individually evaluated loans that are determined to be impaired as well as estimated credit losses inherent in the remainder of the loan portfolio. The ALLL is prepared using the information provided by the Company’s credit review process together with data from peer institutions and economic information gathered from published sources.
The loan portfolio is segmented into groups of loans with similar risk characteristics. Each segment possesses varying degrees of risk based on, among other things, the type of loan, the type of collateral, and the
25
Table of Contents
sensitivity of the borrower or industry to changes in external factors such as economic conditions. An estimated loss rate calculated using the Company’s actual historical loss rates adjusted for current portfolio trends, economic conditions, and other relevant internal and external factors, is applied to each group’s aggregate loan balances.
The Company’s base ALLL factors are determined by management using the Bank’s annualized actual trailing charge-off data over intervals ranging from
84
to
6 months
. Adjustments to those base factors are made for relevant internal and external factors. Those factors may include:
•
Changes in national, regional and local economic conditions, including trends in real estate values and the interest rate environment,
•
Changes in the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, including new types of lending,
•
Changes in volume and severity of past due loans, the volume of nonaccrual loans, and the volume and severity of adversely classified or graded loans, and
•
The existence and effect of concentrations of credit, and changes in the level of such concentrations.
The resulting total ALLL factor is compared for reasonableness against the
10
-year average,
15
-year average, and trailing
12
month total charge-off data for all Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) insured commercial banks and savings institutions based in California. This factor is applied to balances graded pass-1through pass-5. For loans risk graded as watch or worse, progressively higher potential loss factors are applied based on management’s judgment, taking into consideration the specific characteristics of the Bank’s portfolio and analysis of results from a select group of the Company’s peers.
26
Table of Contents
The following tables summarize the allocation of the ALLL, as well as the activity in the ALLL attributed to various segments in the loan portfolio as of and for the
three and six
months ended for the periods indicated:
Three Months Ended June 30, 2016
Commercial and industrial
Franchise
Commercial owner occupied
SBA
Warehouse Facilities
Commercial non-owner occupied
Multi-family
One-to-four family
Construction
Land
Other loans
Total
(dollars in thousands)
Balance, March 31, 2016
$
3,023
$
3,568
$
1,965
$
1,628
$
7
$
1,897
$
2,932
$
705
$
2,504
$
204
$
22
$
18,455
Charge-offs
(710
)
(169
)
(329
)
(5
)
—
—
—
(7
)
—
—
—
(1,220
)
Recoveries
40
—
—
82
—
—
—
5
—
—
4
131
Provisions for (reduction in) loan losses
2,132
(147
)
505
(146
)
(7
)
207
(598
)
(96
)
(259
)
—
(2
)
1,589
Balance, June 30, 2016
$
4,485
$
3,252
$
2,141
$
1,559
$
—
$
2,104
$
2,334
$
607
$
2,245
$
204
$
24
$
18,955
Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
Commercial and industrial
Franchise
Commercial owner occupied
SBA
Warehouse Facilities
Commercial non-owner occupied
Multi-family
One-to-four family
Construction
Land
Other loans
Total
(dollars in thousands)
Balance, December 31, 2015
$
3,449
$
3,124
$
1,870
$
1,500
$
759
$
2,048
$
1,583
$
698
$
2,030
$
233
$
23
$
17,317
Charge-offs
(710
)
(169
)
(329
)
(5
)
—
—
—
(7
)
—
—
—
(1,220
)
Recoveries
54
—
—
85
—
—
—
6
—
—
4
149
Provisions for (reduction in) loan losses
1,692
297
600
(21
)
(759
)
56
751
(90
)
215
(29
)
(3
)
2,709
Balance, June 30, 2016
$
4,485
$
3,252
$
2,141
$
1,559
$
—
$
2,104
$
2,334
$
607
$
2,245
$
204
$
24
$
18,955
Amount of allowance attributed to:
27
Table of Contents
Specifically evaluated impaired loans
$
—
$
731
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
731
General portfolio allocation
4,485
2,521
2,141
1,559
—
2,104
2,334
607
2,245
204
24
18,224
Loans individually evaluated for impairment
1,051
1,461
486
328
—
—
—
137
—
18
—
3,481
Specific reserves to total loans individually evaluated for impairment
—
%
50.03
%
—
%
—
%
—
%
—
%
—
%
—
%
—
%
—
%
—
%
21.00
%
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment
$
507,090
$
402,394
$
442,574
$
85,748
$
—
$
526,362
$
613,573
$
106,401
$
215,786
$
18,323
$
5,822
$
2,924,073
General reserves to total loans collectively evaluated for impairment
0.88
%
0.63
%
0.48
%
1.82
%
—
%
0.40
%
0.38
%
0.57
%
1.04
%
1.11
%
0.41
%
0.62
%
Total gross loans
$
508,141
$
403,855
$
443,060
$
86,076
$
—
$
526,362
$
613,573
$
106,538
$
215,786
$
18,341
$
5,822
$
2,927,554
Total allowance to gross loans
0.88
%
0.81
%
0.48
%
1.81
%
—
%
0.40
%
0.38
%
0.57
%
1.04
%
1.11
%
0.41
%
0.65
%
Three Months Ended June 30, 2015
Commercial and industrial
Franchise
Commercial owner occupied
SBA
Warehouse Facilities
Commercial non-owner occupied
Multi-family
One-to-four family
Construction
Land
Other loans
Total
(dollars in thousands)
Balance, March 31, 2015
$
3,443
$
1,740
$
1,602
$
547
$
889
$
2,131
$
1,303
$
674
$
1,210
$
78
$
29
$
13,646
Charge-offs
—
(393
)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(393
)
Recoveries
12
—
—
1
—
—
—
—
—
—
1
14
Provisions for (reduction in) loan losses
271
477
246
338
(14
)
(168
)
229
(21
)
192
284
(1
)
1,833
Balance, June 30, 2015
$
3,726
$
1,824
$
1,848
$
886
$
875
$
1,963
$
1,532
$
653
$
1,402
$
362
$
29
$
15,100
Six Months Ended June 30, 2015
Commercial and industrial
Franchise
Commercial owner occupied
SBA
Warehouse Facilities
Commercial non-owner occupied
Multi-family
One-to-four family
Construction
Land
Other loans
Total
(dollars in thousands)
28
Table of Contents
Balance, December 31, 2014
$
2,646
$
1,554
$
1,757
$
568
$
546
$
2,007
$
1,060
$
842
$
1,088
$
108
$
24
$
12,200
Charge-offs
(24
)
(765
)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(789
)
Recoveries
24
—
—
1
—
—
—
—
—
—
1
26
Provisions for (reduction in) loan losses
1,080
1,035
91
317
329
(44
)
472
(189
)
314
254
4
3,663
Balance, June 30, 2015
$
3,726
$
1,824
$
1,848
$
886
$
875
$
1,963
$
1,532
$
653
$
1,402
$
362
$
29
$
15,100
Amount of allowance attributed to:
Specifically evaluated impaired loans
$
223
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
223
General portfolio allocation
3,503
1,824
1,848
886
875
1,963
1,532
653
1,402
362
29
14,877
Loans individually evaluated for impairment
223
1,461
370
—
—
443
—
206
—
23
—
2,726
Specific reserves to total loans individually evaluated for impairment
100.00
%
—
%
—
%
—
%
—
%
—
%
—
%
—
%
—
%
—
%
—
%
8.18
%
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment
$
284,650
$
256,121
$
294,175
$
50,306
$
198,113
$
402,343
$
400,237
$
84,077
$
124,448
$
16,316
$
4,811
$
2,115,597
General reserves to total loans collectively evaluated for impairment
1.23
%
0.71
%
0.63
%
1.76
%
0.44
%
0.49
%
0.38
%
0.78
%
1.13
%
2.22
%
0.60
%
0.70
%
Total gross loans
$
284,873
$
257,582
$
294,545
$
50,306
$
198,113
$
402,786
$
400,237
$
84,283
$
124,448
$
16,339
$
4,811
$
2,118,323
Total allowance to gross loans
1.31
%
0.71
%
0.63
%
1.76
%
0.44
%
0.49
%
0.38
%
0.77
%
1.13
%
2.22
%
0.60
%
0.71
%
29
Table of Contents
Note 8 – Subordinated Debentures
In August 2014, the Corporation issued
$60 million
in aggregate principal amount of
5.75%
Subordinated Notes Due 2024 (the “Notes”) in a private placement transaction to institutional accredited investors (the “Private Placement”). The Corporation contributed
$50 million
of net proceeds from the Private Placement to the Bank to support general corporate purposes. The Notes bear interest at an annual fixed rate of
5.75%
, and the first interest payment on the Notes occurred on March 3, 2015, and interest payments have since been paid, and will continue to be payable semiannually each March 3 and September 3 until September 3, 2024. The Notes can only be redeemed, partially or in whole, prior to the maturity date if the notes do not constitute Tier 2 Capital (for purposes of capital adequacy guidelines of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve). Outstanding principal and accrued and unpaid interest are due upon early redemption.
In connection with the Private Placement, the Corporation obtained ratings from Kroll Bond Rating Agency (“KBRA”). KBRA assigned investment grade ratings of BBB+ and BBB for the Corporation’s senior unsecured debt and subordinated debt, respectively, and a senior deposit rating of A- for the Bank. These ratings were affirmed by KBRA on October 23, 2015.
In March 2004, the Corporation issued
$10.3 million
of Floating Rate Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debentures (the “Subordinated Debentures”) to PPBI Trust I, which funded the payment of
$10 million
of Floating Rate Trust Preferred Securities (“Trust Preferred Securities”) issued by PPBI Trust I in March 2004 due April 7, 2034. The net proceeds from the offering of Trust Preferred Securities were contributed as capital to the Bank to support further growth. Interest is payable quarterly on the Subordinated Debentures at
three-month LIBOR
plus
2.75%
per annum, for an effective rate of
3.38%
per annum as of
June 30, 2016
.
The Corporation is not allowed to consolidate PPBI Trust I into the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The resulting effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements is to report only the Subordinated Debentures as a component of the Company’s liabilities.
Note 9 – Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net income or loss available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period, excluding common shares in treasury. Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted from the issuance of common stock that would then share in earnings and excludes common shares in treasury. Stock options exercisable for shares of common stock are excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share if they are anti-dilutive due to their exercise price exceeding the average market price during the period.
The impact of stock options which are anti-dilutive are excluded from the computations of diluted earnings per share. The dilutive impact of these securities could be included in future computations of diluted earnings per share if the market price of the common stock increases. The following table sets forth the weighted average number of stock options excluded for the periods indicated:
Three Months Ended
Six Months Ended
June 30,
March 31,
June 30,
June 30,
June 30,
2016
2016
2015
2016
2015
Weighted average stock options excluded
154,251
108,407
464,647
131,703
429,625
30
Table of Contents
The following tables set forth the Company’s earnings per share calculations for the periods indicated:
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2016
March 31, 2016
June 30, 2015
Net
Income
Shares
Per Share
Amount
Net
Income
Shares
Per Share
Amount
Net
Income
Shares
Per Share
Amount
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Net income
$
10,369
$
8,554
$
7,825
Basic income available to common stockholders
10,369
27,378,930
$
0.38
8,554
25,555,654
$
0.33
7,825
21,493,641
$
0.36
Effect of dilutive stock option grants and warrants
—
466,560
—
396,530
—
335,235
Diluted income available to common stockholders plus assumed conversions
$
10,369
27,845,490
$
0.37
$
8,554
25,952,184
$
0.33
$
7,825
21,828,876
$
0.36
Six Months Ended June 30,
2016
2015
Net
Income
Shares
Per Share
Amount
Net
Income
Shares
Per Share
Amount
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Net income
$
18,923
$
9,613
Basic income available to common stockholders
18,923
26,467,292
$
0.72
9,613
20,796,655
$
0.46
Effect of dilutive stock options and warrants
—
434,335
—
329,887
Diluted income available to common stockholders plus assumed conversions
$
18,923
26,901,627
$
0.70
$
9,613
21,126,542
$
0.46
Note 10 – Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The fair value of an asset or liability is the price that would be received to sell that asset or paid to transfer that liability in an orderly transaction occurring in the principal market (or most advantageous market in the absence of a principal market) for such asset or liability. In estimating fair value, the Company utilizes valuation techniques that are consistent with the market approach, the income approach, and/or the cost approach. Such valuation techniques are consistently applied. Inputs to valuation techniques include the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. ASC Topic 825 requires disclosure of the fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities, including both those financial assets and financial liabilities that are not measured and reported at fair value on a recurring basis and a non-recurring basis. The methodologies for estimating the fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities that are measured at fair value, and for estimating the fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities not recorded at fair value, are discussed below.
31
Table of Contents
In accordance with accounting guidance, the Company groups its financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value in three levels, based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described as follows:
Level 1 - Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.
Level 2 - Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These might include quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (such as interest rates, prepayment speeds, volatilities, etc.) or model-based valuation techniques where all significant assumptions are observable, either directly or indirectly, in the market.
Level 3 - Valuation is generated from model-based techniques where one or more significant inputs are not observable, either directly or indirectly, in the market. These unobservable assumptions reflect the Company’s own estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Valuation techniques may include use of matrix pricing, discounted cash flow models, and similar techniques.
Because no market exists for a significant portion of the Company’s financial instruments, fair value estimates are based on judgments regarding current economic conditions, risk characteristics of various financial instruments, and other factors. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and therefore cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the fair values presented. Management uses its best judgment in estimating the fair value of the Company’s financial instruments; however, there are inherent limitations in any estimation technique. Therefore, for substantially all financial instruments, the fair value estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Company could have realized in a sales transaction at
June 30, 2016
,
March 31, 2016
and
June 30, 2015
.
A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Management maximizes the use of observable inputs and attempts to minimize the use of unobservable inputs when determining fair value measurements. The following is a description of both the general and specific valuation methodologies used for certain instruments measured at fair value, as well as the general classification of these instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy.
Cash and due from banks
– The carrying amounts of cash and short-term instruments approximate fair value due to the liquidity of these instruments.
Investment securities
– Investment securities are generally valued based upon quotes obtained from an independent third-party pricing service, which uses evaluated pricing applications and model processes. Observable market inputs, such as, benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads, two-sided markets, benchmark securities, bids, offers and reference data are considered as part of the evaluation. The inputs are related directly to the security being evaluated, or indirectly to a similarly situated security. Market assumptions and market data are utilized in the valuation models. The Company reviews the market prices provided by the third-party pricing service for reasonableness based on the Company’s understanding of the market place and credit issues related to the securities. The Company has not made any adjustments to the market quotes provided by them and, accordingly, the Company categorized its investment portfolio within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
FHLB, FRB, Other Stock
– Due to restrictions placed on transferability, it is not practical to determine the fair value of the stock.
32
Table of Contents
Loans Held for Sale —
The fair value of loans held for sale is estimated based upon binding contracts and quotes from third party investors resulting in a Level 2 classification.
Loans Held for Investment —
The fair value of loans, other than loans on nonaccrual status, was estimated by discounting the remaining contractual cash flows using the estimated current rate at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit risk characteristics and for the same remaining maturities, reduced by deferred net loan origination fees and the allocable portion of the allowance for loan losses. Accordingly, in determining the estimated current rate for discounting purposes, no adjustment has been made for any change in borrowers’ credit risks since the origination of such loans. Rather, the allocable portion of the allowance for loan losses is considered to provide for such changes in estimating fair value. As a result, this fair value is not necessarily the value which would be derived using an exit price. These loans are included within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
Impaired loans and OREO
–
Impaired loans and OREO assets are recorded at the fair value less estimated costs to sell at the time of foreclosure. The fair value of impaired loans and OREO assets are generally based on recent real estate appraisals adjusted for estimated selling costs. These appraisals may utilize a single valuation approach or a combination of approaches including comparable sales and the income approach. Adjustments are routinely made in the appraisal process by the appraisers to adjust for differences between the comparable sales and income data available. Such adjustments are typically significant and result in a Level 3 classification of the inputs for determining fair value.
Deposit Accounts and Short-term Borrowings —
The amounts payable to depositors for demand, savings, and money market accounts, and short-term borrowings are considered to approximate fair value. The fair value of fixed-maturity certificates of deposit is estimated using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities using a discounted cash flow calculation. Interest-bearing deposits and borrowings are included within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Term FHLB Advances and Other Long-term Borrowings—
The fair value of long term borrowings is determined using rates currently available for similar borrowings with similar credit risk and for the remaining maturities and are classified as Level 2.
Subordinated Debentures
– The fair value of subordinated debentures is estimated by discounting the balance by the current three-month LIBOR rate plus the current market spread. The fair value is determined based on the maturity date as the Company does not currently have intentions to call the debenture and is classified as Level 2.
Accrued Interest Receivable/Payble
– The carrying amounts of accrued interest receivable and accrued interest payable are deemed to approximate fair value.
Estimated fair values are disclosed for financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate fair value. These estimates are made at a specific point in time based on relevant market data and information about the financial instruments. These estimates do not reflect any premium or discount that could result from offering the Company’s entire holdings of a particular financial instrument for sale at one time, nor do they attempt to estimate the value of anticipated future business related to the instruments. In addition, the tax ramifications related to the realization of unrealized gains and losses can have a significant effect on fair value estimates and have not been considered in any of these estimates.
33
Table of Contents
The fair value estimates presented herein are based on pertinent information available to management as of the periods indicated.
At June 30, 2016
Carrying
Amount
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Estimated
Fair Value
(in thousands)
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
$
185,299
$
185,299
$
—
$
—
$
185,299
Interest bearing time deposits with financial institutions
3,944
3,944
—
—
3,944
Investments held to maturity
9,292
—
9,390
—
9,390
Investment securities available for sale
245,471
—
245,471
—
245,471
FHLB, FRB, and other stock
26,984
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Loans held for sale
10,116
—
11,128
—
Loans held for investment, net
2,901,664
—
—
2,918,457
2,918,457
Accrued interest receivable
12,143
12,143
—
—
12,143
Liabilities:
Deposit accounts
2,931,001
2,351,184
620,675
—
2,971,859
FHLB advances
75,000
—
75,016
—
75,016
Other borrowings
45,252
—
45,878
—
45,878
Subordinated debentures
70,310
—
68,425
—
68,425
Accrued interest payable
305
305
—
—
305
At December 31, 2015
Carrying
Amount
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Estimated
Fair Value
(in thousands)
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
$
78,417
$
78,417
$
—
$
—
$
78,417
Interest bearing time deposits with financial institutions
1,972
1,972
—
—
1,972
Investments held to maturity
9,642
—
9,572
—
9,572
Investment securities available for sale
280,273
—
280,273
—
280,273
FHLB, FRB, and other stock
22,292
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Loans held for sale
8,565
—
9,507
—
9,507
Loans held for investment, net
2,236,998
—
—
2,244,936
2,244,936
Accrued interest receivable
9,315
9,315
—
—
9,315
Liabilities:
Deposit accounts
2,195,123
1,674,148
521,291
—
2,195,439
FHLB advances
148,000
—
148,036
—
148,036
Other borrowings
48,125
—
49,156
—
49,156
Subordinated debentures
70,310
—
68,675
—
68,675
Accrued interest payable
206
206
—
—
206
34
Table of Contents
The following fair value hierarchy table presents information about the Company’s financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis at the dates indicated:
June 30, 2016
Fair Value Measurement Using
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Securities at
Fair Value
(in thousands)
Available for sale:
Municipal bonds
$
—
$
118,799
$
—
$
118,799
Collateralized mortgage obligation
$
—
$
22,844
$
—
$
22,844
Mortgage-backed securities
—
103,828
—
103,828
Total securities available for sale
$
—
$
245,471
$
—
$
245,471
December 31, 2015
Fair Value Measurement Using
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Securities at
Fair Value
(in thousands)
Available for sale:
Municipal bonds
$
—
$
130,245
$
—
130,245
Collateralized mortgage obligation
$
—
$
24,543
$
—
24,543
Mortgage-backed securities
—
125,485
—
125,485
Total securities available for sale
$
—
$
280,273
$
—
$
280,273
A loan is considered impaired when it is probable that payment of interest and principal will not be made in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impairment is measured based on the fair value of the underlying collateral or the discounted expected future cash flows. The Company measures impairment on all non-accrual loans for which it has reduced the principal balance to the value of the underlying collateral less the anticipated selling cost. As such, the Company records impaired loans as Level 3. At
June 30, 2016
, substantially all the Company’s impaired loans were evaluated based on the fair value of their underlying collateral based upon the most recent appraisal available to management.
The Company’s valuation methodologies may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. While management believes the Company’s valuation methodologies are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different estimate of fair value at the reporting date.
The fair value of impaired loans and other real estate owned were determined using Level 3 assumptions, and represents impaired loan and other real estate loan balances for which a specific reserve has been established or on which a write down has been taken. Generally, the Company obtains third party appraisals (or property evaluations) and/or collateral audits in conjunction with internal analysis based on historical experience on its impaired loans and other real estate owned to determine fair value. In determining the net realizable value of the underlying collateral for impaired loans, the Company will then discount the valuation to cover both market price fluctuations and selling costs the Company expected would be incurred in the event of foreclosure. In addition to the discounts taken, the Company’s calculation of net realizable value considered any other senior liens in place on the underlying collateral.
35
Table of Contents
The following table provides a summary of the financial instruments the Company measures at fair value on a non-recurring basis as of the periods indicated:
June 30, 2016
Fair Value Measurement Using
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Assets at
Fair Value
(in thousands)
Assets
Collateral dependent impaired loans
Business loans:
Commercial and industrial
$
—
$
—
$
1,028
$
1,028
Commercial owner occupied
—
—
486
486
SBA
—
—
329
329
Real estate loans:
One-to-four family
—
—
137
137
Land
—
—
18
18
Total collateral dependent impaired loans
$
—
$
—
$
1,998
$
1,998
Other real estate owned
Land
—
—
711
711
Total other real estate owned
—
—
711
711
Total assets
$
—
$
—
$
2,709
$
2,709
December 31, 2015
Fair Value Measurement Using
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Assets at
Fair Value
(in thousands)
Assets
Collateral dependent impaired loans
Business loans:
Commercial and industrial
$
—
$
—
$
313
$
313
Franchise
—
—
168
168
Commercial owner occupied
—
—
536
536
Real estate loans:
—
Commercial non-owner occupied
—
—
214
214
One-to-four family
—
—
70
70
Land
—
—
21
21
Total collateral dependent impaired loans
$
—
$
—
$
1,322
$
1,322
Other real estate owned
Land
—
—
1,161
1,161
Total other real estate owned
—
—
1,161
1,161
Total assets
$
—
$
—
$
2,483
$
2,483
36
Table of Contents
The following table presents quantitative information about Level 3 of fair value measurements for financial instruments measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis for the periods indicated:
June 30, 2016
Range
Fair Value
Valuation Techniques
Unobservable Inputs
Rate
Maturity (years)
Unobservable Inputs
(dollars in thousands)
Collateral dependent impaired loans:
Business loans:
Commercial and industrial
$
1,028
Collateral valuation
Management adjustment to reflect current conditions and selling costs
6.00%
1
0 - 10%
Commercial owner occupied
486
Collateral valuation
Management adjustment to reflect current conditions and selling costs
6.75 - 7.75%
10
0 - 10%
SBA
329
Collateral valuation
Management adjustment to reflect current conditions and selling costs
6.00 - 6.25%
15-23
0 - 10%
Real estate loans:
One-to-four family
137
Collateral valuation
Management adjustment to reflect current conditions and selling costs
9.00 - 15.00%
4 - 14
0 - 10%
Land
18
Collateral valuation
Management adjustment to reflect current conditions and selling costs
13.00%
15
0 - 10%
Total collateral dependent impaired loans
$
1,998
Other real estate owned
Land
$
711
Collateral valuation
Management adjustment to reflect current conditions and selling costs
—%
0
0 - 10%
Total other real estate owned
$
711
37
Table of Contents
December 31, 2015
Range
Fair Value
Valuation Techniques
Unobservable Inputs
Rate
Maturity (years)
Unobservable Inputs
(dollars in thousands)
Collateral dependent impaired loans:
Business loans:
Commercial and industrial
$
313
Collateral valuation
Management adjustment to reflect current conditions and selling costs
7.50%
6
0 - 10%
Franchise
$
168
Collateral valuation
Management adjustment to reflect current conditions and selling costs
5.70% - 6.70%
7-8
0 - 10%
Commercial owner occupied
536
Collateral valuation
Management adjustment to reflect current conditions and selling costs
7.75%
7
0 - 10%
Real estate loans:
Commercial non-owner occupied
214
Collateral valuation
Management adjustment to reflect current conditions and selling costs
6.75%
2-12
0 - 15%
One-to-four family
$
70
Collateral valuation
Management adjustment to reflect current conditions and selling costs
9.00% - 15.00%
5 - 16
0 - 10%
Land
$
21
Collateral valuation
Management adjustment to reflect current conditions and selling costs
13.00%
15
0 - 10%
Total collateral dependent impaired loans
$
1,322
Other real estate owned
Land
$
1,161
Collateral valuation
Management adjustment to reflect current conditions and selling costs
—%
0
0-10%
Total other real estate owned
$
1,161
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
38
Table of Contents
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains information and statements that are considered “forward looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). These forward-looking statements represent plans, estimates, objectives, goals, guidelines, expectations, intentions, projections and statements of our beliefs concerning future events, business plans, objectives, expected operating results and the assumptions upon which those statements are based. Forward-looking statements include without limitation, any statement that may predict, forecast, indicate or imply future results, performance or achievements, and are typically identified with words such as “may,” “could,” “should,” “will,” “would,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” or words or phrases of similar meaning. We caution that the forward-looking statements are based largely on our expectations and are subject to a number of known and unknown risks and uncertainties that are subject to change based on factors which are, in many instances, beyond our control. Actual results, performance or achievements could differ materially from those contemplated, expressed, or implied by the forward-looking statements.
39
Table of Contents
The following factors, among others, could cause our financial performance to differ materially from that expressed in such forward-looking statements:
•
The strength of the United States economy in general and the strength of the local economies in which we conduct operations;
•
The effects of, and changes in, trade, monetary and fiscal policies and laws, including interest rate policies of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve”);
•
Inflation/deflation, interest rate, market and monetary fluctuations;
•
The timely development of competitive new products and services and the acceptance of these products and services by new and existing customers;
•
The impact of changes in financial services policies, laws and regulations, including those concerning taxes, banking, securities and insurance, and the application thereof by regulatory bodies;
•
Technological and social media changes;
•
The effect of acquisitions we have made or may make, including, without limitation, the failure to achieve the expected revenue growth or expense savings from such acquisitions, or the failure to effectively integrate an acquisition target into our operations;
•
Changes in the level of our nonperforming assets and charge-offs;
•
The effect of changes in accounting policies and practices, as may be adopted from time-to-time by bank regulatory agencies, the SEC, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the FASB or other accounting standards setters;
•
Possible OTTI of securities held by us;
•
Changes in consumer spending, borrowing and savings habits;
•
The effects of our lack of a diversified loan portfolio, including the risks of geographic and industry concentrations;
•
Ability to attract deposits and other sources of liquidity;
•
Changes in the financial performance and/or condition of our borrowers;
•
Changes in the competitive environment among financial and bank holding companies and other financial service providers;
•
Geopolitical conditions, including acts or threats of terrorism, actions taken by the United States or other governments in response to acts or threats of terrorism and/or military conflicts, which could impact business and economic conditions in the United States and abroad;
•
Unanticipated regulatory or judicial proceedings; and
•
Our ability to manage the risks involved in the foregoing.
If one or more of the factors affecting our forward-looking information and statements proves incorrect, then our actual results, performance or achievements could differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, forward-looking information and statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and other reports and registration statements filed by us with the SEC. Therefore, we caution you not to place undue reliance on our forward-looking information and statements. We will not update the forward-looking information and statements to reflect actual results or changes in the factors affecting the forward-looking information and statements. For information on the factors that could cause actual results to differ from the expectations stated in the forward-looking statements, see “Risk Factors” under Part I, Item 1A of our
2015
Annual Report.
Forward-looking information and statements should not be viewed as predictions, and should not be the primary basis upon which investors evaluate us. Any investor in our common stock should consider all risks and
40
Table of Contents
uncertainties disclosed in our filings with the SEC, all of which are accessible on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov.
GENERAL
This discussion should be read in conjunction with our Management Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in our
2015
Annual Report, plus the unaudited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. The results for the
three and six
months ended
June 30, 2016
are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the year ending
December 31, 2016
.
The Corporation is a California-based bank holding company incorporated in the state of Delaware and registered as a bank holding company under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (“BHCA”). Our wholly owned subsidiary, Pacific Premier Bank, is a California state-chartered commercial bank. As a bank holding company, the Corporation is subject to regulation and supervision by the Federal Reserve. We are required to file with the Federal Reserve quarterly and annual reports and such additional information as the Federal Reserve may require pursuant to the BHCA. The Federal Reserve may conduct examinations of bank holding companies, such as the Corporation, and its subsidiaries. The Corporation is also a bank holding company within the meaning of the California Financial Code. As such, the Corporation and its subsidiaries are subject to examination by, and may be required to file reports with, the California Department of Business Oversight-Division of Financial Institutions (“DBO”).
A bank holding company, such as the Corporation, is required to serve as a source of financial strength to its subsidiary depository institutions and to commit resources to support such institutions in circumstances where it might not do so absent such a policy. The Federal Reserve, under the BHCA, has the authority to require a bank holding company to terminate any activity or to relinquish control of a nonbank subsidiary (other than a nonbank subsidiary of a bank) upon the Federal Reserve’s determination that such activity or control constitutes a serious risk to the financial soundness and stability of any bank subsidiary of the bank holding company.
As a California state-chartered commercial bank which is a member of the Federal Reserve, the Bank is subject to supervision, periodic examination and regulation by the DBO and the Federal Reserve. The Bank’s deposits are insured by the FDIC through the Deposit Insurance Fund. In general terms, insurance coverage is up to $250,000 per depositor for all deposit accounts. As a result of this deposit insurance function, the FDIC also has certain supervisory authority and powers over the Bank. If, as a result of an examination of the Bank, the regulators should determine that the financial condition, capital resources, asset quality, earnings prospects, management, liquidity or other aspects of the Bank’s operations are unsatisfactory or that the Bank or our management is violating or has violated any law or regulation, various remedies are available to the regulators. Such remedies include the power to enjoin unsafe or unsound practices, to require affirmative action to correct any conditions resulting from any violation or practice, to issue an administrative order that can be judicially enforced, to direct an increase in capital, to restrict growth, to assess civil monetary penalties, to remove officers and directors and ultimately to request the FDIC to terminate the Bank’s deposit insurance. As a California-chartered commercial bank, the Bank is also subject to certain provisions of California law.
We provide banking services within our targeted markets in California to businesses, including the owners and employees of those businesses, professionals, real estate investors and non-profit organizations, as well as consumers in the communities we serve. Additionally, through our HOA Banking and Lending and Franchise Capital units we can provide customized cash management, electronic banking services and credit facilities to HOAs, HOA management companies and QSR franchise owners nationwide. Our corporate headquarters are located in Irvine, California. At
June 30, 2016
, the Bank operated 19 full-service depository branches in California located in the cities of Corona, Encinitas, Huntington Beach, Irvine, Los Alamitos, Murrieta, Newport Beach, Orange, Palm Desert (2), Palm Springs (2), Redlands, Riverside, San Bernardino (2), San Diego (2) and Seal Beach. On April 22, 2016, the Bank closed three branches, as announced in conjunction with the merger with Security Bank of California. Those branches were located in Palm Desert, Riverside, and Tustin. On May 2, 2016, the
41
Table of Contents
Corporation announced the consolidation of three branches into existing branches in close proximity. The Bank anticipates closing one of its branches in San Diego and its Seal Beach branch on July 29, 2016 and closing one of its branches in Palm Springs on August 5, 2016. After these branch closures, the Bank will operate 16 full-service depository branches in California. Through our branches and our web site at www.ppbi.com, we offer a broad array of deposit products and services for both business and consumer customers, including checking, money market and savings accounts, cash management services, electronic banking, and on-line bill payment. We also offer a variety of loan products, including commercial business loans, lines of credit, commercial real estate loans, SBA loans, residential home loans, and home equity loans. The Bank funds its lending and investment activities with retail deposits obtained through its branches, advances from the FHLB, lines of credit, and wholesale and brokered certificates of deposits.
Our principal source of income is the net spread between interest earned on loans and investments and the interest costs associated with deposits and borrowings used to finance the loan and investment portfolios. Additionally, the Bank generates fee income from loan and investment sales and various products and services offered to both depository and loan customers.
42
Table of Contents
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Management has established various accounting policies that govern the application of U.S. GAAP in the preparation of our financial statements. Our significant accounting policies are described in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our
2015
Annual Report. There have been no significant changes to our Critical Accounting Policies as described in our
2015
Annual Report.
Certain accounting policies require management to make estimates and assumptions which have a material impact on the carrying value of certain assets and liabilities; management considers these to be critical accounting policies. The estimates and assumptions management uses are based on historical experience and other factors, which management believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ significantly from these estimates and assumptions, which could have a material impact on the carrying value of assets and liabilities at balance sheet dates and our results of operations for future reporting periods.
We consider the ALLL to be a critical accounting policy that requires judicious estimates and assumptions in the preparation of our financial statements that is particularly susceptible to significant change. For further information, see “Allowances for Loan Losses” discussed in Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our
2015
Annual Report.
SCAF ACQUISITION
Effective January 31, 2016, the Company acquired SCAF, and its wholly-owned bank subsidiary, Security Bank of California, a Riverside, California, based state-chartered bank, pursuant to the terms of a definitive agreement entered into by the Corporation and SCAF on October 2, 2015. As a result of the SCAF acquisition, the Bank acquired and recorded at the acquisition date assets with a fair value of approximately $765 million, including:
•
$456 million
of gross loans;
•
$190 million
in investment securities;
•
$51.1 million
in goodwill;
•
$40.9 million
of cash and cash equivalents;
•
$18.3 million of other types of assets; and
•
$4.5 million
in fixed assets;
•
$4.3 million
of a core deposit intangible.
Also as a result of the SCAF acquisition, the Company recorded $119 million of equity in connection with the Corporation’s stock issued to SCAF shareholders as part of the acquisition consideration and assumed at acquisition date liabilities with a fair value of approximately
$645 million
, including:
•
$637 million
in deposit transaction accounts; and
•
$8.8 million
other liabilities.
The fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed were determined based on the requirements of FASB ASC Topic 820:
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
. Such fair values are preliminary estimates and are subject to adjustment for up to one year after the merger date or when additional information relative to the closing date fair values becomes available and such information is considered final, whichever is earlier. In the second quarter of 2016, the Company made a $146,000 adjustment to fixed assets and goodwill.
43
Table of Contents
The acquisition was an opportunity for the Company to further strengthen its competitive position as one of the premier community banks headquartered in Southern California. The integration and system conversion of SCAF was completed in April of 2016.
IDPK ACQUISITION
Effective January 26, 2015, the Company acquired IDPK, a Newport Beach, California, based state-chartered bank, pursuant to the terms of a definitive agreement entered into by the Corporation, the Bank and IDPK on October 22, 2014. As a result of the IDPK acquisition, the Bank acquired and recorded at the acquisition date assets with a fair value of approximately $423 million, including:
•
$333 million of gross loans;
•
$56.1 million in investment securities;
•
$27.9 million in goodwill;
•
$11.3 million in bank owned life insurance;
•
$10.5 million of cash and cash equivalents;
•
$9.3 million of other types of assets; and
•
$2.9 million of a core deposit intangible.
Also as a result of the IDPK acquisition, the Company recorded $72.2 million of equity in connection with the Corporation’s stock issued to IDPK shareholders as part of the acquisition consideration and assumed at acquisition date liabilities with a fair value of approximately $371.1 million, including:
•
$270 million in deposit transaction accounts;
•
$66 million in retail certificates of deposit;
•
$33.3 million in FHLB advances; and
•
$1.8 million other liabilities.
The fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed were determined based on the requirements of FASB ASC Topic 820:
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
.
The acquisition was an opportunity for the Company to strengthen its competitive position as one of the premier community banks headquartered in Southern California. Additionally, the IDPK acquisition enhanced and connected the Company’s footprint in Southern California. The integration and system conversion of IDPK was completed in April of 2015.
44
Table of Contents
NON-GAAP MEASUREMENTS
For periods presented below, adjusted net income, adjusted diluted earnings per share and adjusted return on average assets are non-GAAP financial measures derived from GAAP-based amounts. We calculate these figures by excluding merger-related expenses in the period results. Management believes that the exclusion of such items from these financial measures provides useful information to an understanding of the operating results of our core business. However, these non-GAAP financial measures are supplemental and are not a substitute for an analysis based on GAAP measures. As other companies may use different calculations for these adjusted measures, this presentation may not be comparable to other similarly titled adjusted measures reported by other companies.
Three Months Ended
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2016
March 31, 2016
June 30, 2015
June 30, 2016
June 30, 2015
(dollars in thousands)
Net income
$
10,369
$
8,554
$
7,825
$
18,923
$
9,613
Plus merger related expenses
497
3,119
—
3,616
3,992
Less merger related expenses tax adjustment (1)
(190
)
(1,016
)
(1,206
)
(1,482
)
Adjusted net income
$
10,676
$
10,657
$
7,825
$
21,333
$
12,123
Diluted earnings per share
0.37
0.33
0.36
0.70
0.46
Plus merger-related expenses, net of tax
0.01
0.08
—
0.09
0.12
Adjusted diluted earnings per share
$
0.38
$
0.41
$
0.36
$
0.79
$
0.58
Return on average assets (2)
1.17
%
1.04
%
1.18
%
1.11
%
0.75
%
Plus merger-related expenses, net of tax
0.03
0.26
—
0.14
0.41
Adjusted return on average assets (2)
1.20
%
1.30
%
1.18
%
1.25
%
1.16
%
______________________________
(1) Deductible merger related expenses adjusted by quarterly effective tax rate.
(2) Ratio is annualized.
45
Table of Contents
For periods presented below, return on average tangible common equity and adjusted return on average tangible common equity are non-GAAP financial measures derived from GAAP-based amounts. We calculate these figures by excluding merger-related expenses and/or CDI amortization expense and exclude the average CDI and average goodwill from the average stockholders’ equity during the period. Management believes that the exclusion of such items from these financial measures provides useful information to an understanding of the operating results of our core business. However, these non-GAAP financial measures are supplemental and are not a substitute for an analysis based on GAAP measures. As other companies may use different calculations for these adjusted measures, this presentation may not be comparable to other similarly titled adjusted measures reported by other companies.
Three Months Ended
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2016
March 31, 2016
June 30, 2015
June 30, 2016
June 30, 2015
(dollars in thousands)
Net income
$
10,369
$
8,554
$
7,825
$
18,923
$
9,613
Plus CDI amortization expense
645
344
344
989
658
Less CDI amortization expense tax adjustment (1)
(245
)
(138
)
(128
)
(383
)
(282
)
Net income for average tangible common equity
10,769
8,760
8,041
19,529
9,989
Plus merger related expenses
497
3,119
—
3,616
3,992
Less merger related expenses tax adjustment (2)
(190
)
(1,016
)
—
(1,206
)
(1,482
)
Adjusted net income for average tangible common equity
11,076
10,863
8,041
21,939
12,499
Average stockholders’ equity
432,342
387,202
275,860
407,538
258,846
Less average CDI
10,876
10,110
8,080
10,388
8,258
Less average goodwill
101,923
85,581
50,965
93,426
45,444
Average tangible common equity
$
319,543
$
291,511
$
216,815
$
303,724
$
205,144
Return on average tangible common equity (3)
13.48
%
12.02
%
14.84
%
12.86
%
9.74
%
Adjusted return on average tangible common equity (3)
13.86
%
14.91
%
14.84
%
14.45
%
12.19
%
______________________________
(1) CDI amortization expense adjusted by quarterly effective tax rate.
(2) Deductible merger related expenses adjusted by quarterly effective tax rate.
(3) Ratio is annualized.
46
Table of Contents
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
In the
second
quarter of
2016
, we reported net income of
$10.4 million
, or
$0.37
per diluted share. This compares with net income of
$8.6 million
, or
$0.33
per diluted share for the
first
quarter of
2016
. Net interest income increased by
$3.4 million
from the
first
quarter of
2016
, reflecting an increase in earning assets and a decrease in cost of funds. Non-interest expense for the
second
quarter of
2016
included
$497,000
in merger-related expenses associated with the acquisition of SCAF. Excluding merger-related expenses, net of tax, adjusted net income for the
second
quarter of
2016
was
$10.7 million
, or
$0.38
per diluted share.
Net income of
$10.4 million
, or
$0.37
per diluted share, for the
second
quarter of
2016
compares to net income for the
second
quarter of
2015
of
$7.8 million
or
$0.36
per diluted share. The increase in net income of
$2.5 million
was mostly due to the
$10.5 million
increase in net interest income resulting from earning asset growth and an increase in net interest margin. These items were offset by a
$6.5 million
increase in non-interest expense, including
$3.9 million
in compensation and benefits expenses associated with both the acquisition of SCAF and an increase in staffing to support organic growth.
For the three months ended
June 30, 2016
, the Company’s return on average assets was
1.17%
and return on average tangible common equity was
13.48%
, or
1.20%
and
13.86%
after adjusting for the merger-related expenses, respectively. For the three months ended
March 31, 2016
the return on average assets was
1.04%
and the return on average tangible common equity was
12.02%
, or
1.30%
and
14.91%
after adjusting for the merger-related expenses, respectively. For the three months ended
June 30, 2015
the return on average assets was
1.18%
and the return on average tangible common equity was
14.84%
.
For the first six months of
2016
, the Company recorded net income of
$18.9 million
, or
$0.70
per diluted share. This compares with net income of
$9.6 million
or
$0.46
per diluted share for the first six months of 2015. The increase in net income of
$9.3 million
was mostly due to the
$21.0 million
increase in net interest income resulting from earning asset growth, partially offset by growth in non-interest expense of
$9.7 million
. Prior period comparisons for the year-to-date results are impacted by the acquisition of SCAF in the first quarter of 2016 and the acquisition of IDPK in the first quarter of 2015. Excluding non-recurring merger-related expenses, the Company reported adjusted net income of
$21.3 million
, or
$0.79
per share on a diluted basis, for the first six months of
2016
, compared with
$12.1 million
, or
$0.58
per share on a diluted basis, for the first six months of
2015
.
For the six months ended
June 30, 2016
, the Company’s return on average assets was
1.11%
and return on average tangible common equity was
12.86%
, compared with a return on average assets of
0.75%
and a return on average tangible common equity of
9.74%
for the six months ended
June 30, 2015
. Excluding the non-recurring merger-related expenses, the Company’s adjusted return on average assets was
1.25%
and adjusted return on average tangible common equity was
14.45%
for the six months ended
June 30, 2016
, compared with an adjusted return on average assets of
1.16%
and an adjusted return on average tangible common equity of
12.19%
for the six months ended
June 30, 2015
.
Net Interest Income
Our earnings are derived predominately from net interest income, which is the difference between the interest income earned on interest-earning assets, primarily loans and securities, and the interest expense incurred on interest-bearing liabilities, primarily deposits and borrowings. Net interest income is affected by changes in both interest rates and the volume of average interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities.
47
Table of Contents
Net interest income totaled
$37.6 million
in the
second
quarter of
2016
, an increase of
$3.4 million
or
9.8%
from the
first
quarter of
2016
. The increase in net interest income reflected an increase in average interest-earning assets of
$278 million
, and an increase in the net interest margin of
3
basis points to
4.51%
. The increase in average interest-earning assets during the second quarter of
2016
was primarily related to a full quarter benefit of the SCAF, which added
$467 million
in loans, before purchase accounting adjustments, and a full quarter benefit of the $185 million multi-family loan pool purchased late in the first quarter of 2016.
The expansion in the net interest margin from
4.48%
to
4.51%
was driven by a favorable asset mix arising from the
$361 million
growth in average loans and an $82.5 million decline in average cash and investment balances coupled with lower funding costs from
0.46%
to
0.43%
. Excluding the impact of accretion, the portfolio net interest margin increased 8 basis points, with accretion contributing 27 basis points in the
second
quarter of
2016
as compared to 32 basis points in the
first
quarter of
2016
.
Net interest income for the
second
quarter of
2016
increased
$10.5 million
or
38.6%
compared to the
second
quarter of
2015
. The increase was related to an increase in average interest-earning assets of
$828 million
, which resulted primarily from our organic loan growth since the end of the second quarter of 2015 and our acquisition of SCAF during the first quarter of 2016. Our net interest margin for the second quarter of 2016 increased
20
basis points to
4.51%
from the prior year. The expansion of the net interest margin was driven by a
13
basis point increase in the yield on earning assets, driven primarily by accretion income which added 27 basis points in the quarter as compared to 14 basis points in the
second
quarter of
2015
.
For the first six months of
2016
, net interest income totaled
$71.8 million
, an increase of
$21.0 million
or
41.4%
, compared to the net interest income for the first six months of
2015
. The increase reflected an increase in interest-earning assets of
$784 million
, and an increase in net interest margin of 28 basis points to
4.48%
. The expansion in the net interest margin from
4.20%
to
4.48%
was driven by a favorable asset mix arising from the
$712 million
growth in average loans, primarily related to the acquisitions of SCAF along with our organic loan growth, and a $72.2 million increase in average cash and investment balances coupled with lower funding costs from
0.53%
to
0.45%
. Excluding the impact of accretion, the portfolio net interest margin increased 13 basis points, with accretion contributing 29 basis points in the first six months of
2016
as compared to 14 basis points in the first six months of
2015
.
The following tables present for the periods indicated the average dollar amounts from selected balance sheet categories calculated from daily average balances and the total dollar amount, including adjustments to yields and costs, of:
•
Interest income earned from average interest-earning assets and the resultant yields; and
•
Interest expense incurred from average interest-bearing liabilities and resultant costs, expressed as rates.
48
Table of Contents
The tables below set forth our net interest income, net interest rate spread and net interest rate margin for the periods indicated. The net interest rate margin reflects the relative level of interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities and equals our net interest rate spread divided by average interest-earning assets for the periods indicated.
Average Balance Sheet
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2016
March 31, 2016
June 30, 2015
Average
Balance
Interest
Average
Yield/Cost
Average
Balance
Interest
Average
Yield/Cost
Average
Balance
Interest
Average
Yield/Cost
Assets
(dollars in thousands)
Interest-earning assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
$
177,603
$
189
0.43
%
$
219,539
$
241
0.44
%
$
103,831
$
62
0.24
%
Investment securities
299,049
1,650
2.21
339,593
1,857
2.19
306,774
2,096
2.73
Loans receivable, net (1)
2,873,333
39,035
5.46
2,512,732
35,407
5.67
2,111,253
27,912
5.30
Total interest-earning assets
3,349,985
40,874
4.91
3,071,864
37,505
4.91
2,521,858
30,070
4.78
Noninterest-earning assets
209,741
205,417
140,446
Total assets
$
3,559,726
$
3,277,281
$
2,662,304
Liabilities and Equity
Interest-bearing deposits:
Interest checking
$
178,258
$
50
0.11
$
165,581
$
47
0.11
$
147,620
$
43
0.12
Money market
980,806
896
0.37
891,110
820
0.37
695,935
604
0.35
Savings
98,419
38
0.16
94,773
38
0.16
87,706
35
0.16
Time
606,770
1,026
0.68
582,828
1,164
0.80
472,135
907
0.77
Total interest-bearing deposits
1,864,253
2,010
0.43
1,734,292
2,069
0.48
1,403,396
1,589
0.45
FHLB advances and other borrowings
99,755
324
1.31
111,444
325
1.17
263,633
407
0.62
Subordinated debentures
70,310
979
5.57
70,310
910
5.18
70,310
982
5.60
Total borrowings
170,065
1,303
3.08
181,754
1,235
2.73
333,943
1,389
1.67
Total interest-bearing liabilities
2,034,318
3,313
0.66
1,916,046
3,304
0.69
1,737,339
2,978
0.69
Noninterest-bearing deposits
1,060,097
949,371
627,674
Other liabilities
32,969
24,662
21,431
Total liabilities
3,127,384
2,890,079
2,386,444
Stockholders’ equity
432,342
387,202
275,860
Total liabilities and equity
$
3,559,726
$
3,277,281
$
2,662,304
Net interest income
$
37,561
$
34,201
$
27,092
Net interest rate spread (2)
4.25
%
4.22
%
4.09
%
Net interest margin (3)
4.51
%
4.48
%
4.31
%
Ratio of interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities
164.67
%
160.32
%
145.16
%
49
Table of Contents
Average Balance Sheet
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2016
June 30, 2015
Average
Balance
Interest
Average
Yield/Cost
Average
Balance
Interest
Average
Yield/Cost
Assets
(dollars in thousands)
Interest-earning assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
$
206,682
426
0.41
%
$
164,174
191
0.23
%
Investment securities
319,742
3,511
2.20
%
290,061
3,524
2.43
%
Loans receivable, net (1)
2,693,101
74,442
5.56
%
1,981,126
52,982
5.39
%
Total interest-earning assets
3,219,525
78,379
4.90
%
2,435,361
56,697
4.69
%
Noninterest-earning assets
198,845
127,361
Total assets
$
3,418,370
$
2,562,722
Liabilities and Equity
Interest-bearing deposits:
Interest checking
$
171,396
97
0.11
%
$
146,721
88
0.12
%
Money market
935,959
1,717
0.37
%
670,988
1,166
0.35
%
Savings
96,596
75
0.16
%
87,573
70
0.16
%
Time
594,797
2,190
0.74
%
472,333
1,871
0.80
%
Total interest-bearing deposits
1,798,748
4,079
0.46
%
1,377,615
3,195
0.47
%
FHLB advances and other borrowings
105,599
649
1.24
%
232,838
782
0.68
%
Subordinated debentures
70,310
1,889
5.37
%
70,310
1,953
5.56
%
Total borrowings
175,909
2,538
2.90
%
303,148
2,735
1.82
%
Total interest-bearing liabilities
1,974,657
6,617
0.67
%
1,680,763
5,930
0.71
%
Noninterest-bearing deposits
1,005,307
600,720
Other liabilities
30,868
22,393
Total liabilities
3,010,832
2,303,876
Stockholders' equity
407,538
258,846
Total liabilities and equity
$
3,418,370
$
2,562,722
Net interest income
$
71,762
$
50,767
Net interest rate spread (2)
4.23
%
3.98
%
Net interest margin (3)
4.48
%
4.20
%
Ratio of interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities
163.04
%
144.90
%
______________________________
(1) Average balance includes loans held for sale and nonperforming loans and is net of deferred loan origination fees, unamortized discounts and premiums, and allowance for loan losses.
(2) Represents the difference between the yield on interest-earning assets and the cost of interest-bearing liabilities.
(3) Represents net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets.
50
Table of Contents
Changes in our net interest income are a function of changes in volumes, days in a period and rates of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. The following table presents the impact the volume, days in a period and rate changes have had on our net interest income for the periods indicated. For each category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, we have provided information on changes to our net interest income with respect to:
•
Changes in volume (changes in volume multiplied by prior rate);
•
Changes in days in a period (changes in days in a period multiplied by daily interest);
•
Changes in interest rates (changes in interest rates multiplied by prior volume); and
•
The net change or the combined impact of volume, days in a period and rate changes allocated proportionately to changes in volume, days in a period and changes in interest rates.
Three Months Ended June 30, 2016
Compared to
Three Months Ended March 31, 2016
Increase (decrease) due to
Volume
Rate
Net
(in thousands)
Interest-earning assets
Cash and cash equivalents
$
(47
)
$
(5
)
$
(52
)
Investment securities
(209
)
2
(207
)
Loans receivable, net
4,969
(1,341
)
3,628
Total interest-earning assets
$
4,713
$
(1,344
)
$
3,369
Interest-bearing liabilities
Interest checking
$
3
$
—
$
3
Money market
76
—
76
Time
46
(184
)
(138
)
FHLB advances and other borrowings
(37
)
36
(1
)
Subordinated debentures
—
69
69
Total interest-bearing liabilities
$
88
$
(79
)
$
9
Change in net interest income
$
4,625
$
(1,265
)
$
3,360
51
Table of Contents
Three Months Ended June 30, 2016
Compared to
Three Months Ended June 30, 2015
Increase (decrease) due to
Volume
Rate
Net
(in thousands)
Interest-earning assets
Cash and cash equivalents
$
61
$
66
$
127
Investment securities
(23
)
(423
)
(446
)
Loans receivable, net
10,307
816
11,123
Total interest-earning assets
$
10,345
$
459
$
10,804
Interest-bearing liabilities
Interest checking
$
7
$
—
$
7
Money market
256
36
292
Savings
5
(2
)
3
Time
235
(116
)
119
FHLB advances and other borrowings
(364
)
281
(83
)
Subordinated debentures
—
(3
)
(3
)
Total interest-bearing liabilities
$
139
$
196
$
335
Change in net interest income
$
10,206
$
263
$
10,469
Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
Compared to
Six Months Ended June 30, 2015
Increase (decrease) due to
Volume
Days
Rate
Net
(in thousands)
Interest-earning assets
Cash and cash equivalents
$
58
$
2
$
175
$
235
Investment securities
341
—
(354
)
(13
)
Loans receivable, net
19,343
409
1,708
21,460
Total interest-earning assets
$
19,742
$
411
$
1,529
$
21,682
Interest-bearing liabilities
Interest checking
$
15
$
1
$
(7
)
$
9
Money market
474
9
68
551
Savings
5
—
—
5
Time
456
12
(149
)
319
FHLB advances and other borrowings
(573
)
4
436
(133
)
Subordinated debentures
—
—
(64
)
(64
)
Total interest-bearing liabilities
$
377
$
26
$
284
$
687
Change in net interest income
$
19,365
$
385
$
1,245
$
20,995
52
Table of Contents
Provision for Loan Losses
We recorded a
$1.6 million
provision for loan losses during the
second
quarter of
2016
, an increase of
$469,000
from the
first
quarter of
2016
. The increase in the provision for loan losses was a result of growth in the loan portfolio. Net loan charge-offs amounted to
$1.1 million
in the
second
quarter of
2016
, compared to net recoveries of
$18,000
from the
first
quarter of
2016
.
The
$1.6 million
provision for loan losses during the
second
quarter of
2016
decreased by
$244,000
from the
second
quarter of
2015
. The decrease in the provision for loan losses was due to improvements in asset quality within certain segments of the loan portfolio. The net loan charge-offs amounted to
$1.1 million
in the
second
quarter of
2016
, compared to net charge-offs of
$379,000
from the
second
quarter of
2015
.
For the first six months of
2016
, we recorded a
$2.7 million
provision for loan losses, a decrease from
$3.7 million
recorded for the first six months of
2015
. The decrease in the provision for loan losses was due to improvements in asset quality within certain segments of the loan portfolio. Net loan charge-offs amounted to
$1.1 million
for the first six months of
2016
, an increase from
$763,000
for the first six months of
2015
.
For purchased credit impaired loans, charge-offs are recorded when there is a decrease in the estimated cash flows of the credit from original cash flow estimates. Purchased credit impaired loans were recorded at their estimated fair value, which incorporated our estimated expected cash flows until the ultimate resolution of these credits. To the extent actual or projected cash flows are less than originally estimated, additional provisions for loan losses or charge-offs will be recognized into earnings or against the allowance, if applicable. To the extent actual or projected cash flows are more than originally estimated, the increase in cash flows is prospectively recognized in loan interest income. Due to the accounting rules associated with our purchased credit impaired loans, each quarter we are required to re-estimate cash flows which could cause volatility in our reported net interest margin and provision for loan losses. During the
second
quarter of
2016
, we recorded a charge-off of $329,000 associated with a single purchased credit impaired loan. See “Allowance for Loan Losses” discussed below in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Noninterest Income
Noninterest income for the
second
quarter of
2016
was
$4.5 million
, a decrease of
$412,000
or
8.5%
from the
first
quarter of
2016
. The decrease from the
first
quarter of
2016
was primarily related to a $759,000 recovery recognized in the first quarter on a pre-acquisition loan charge-off, a
$221,000
decrease in net gain from sales of investment securities, partially offset by a
$218,000
increase in net gain from the sale of loans. The increase in gain on sale of loans was the result of higher SBA loan sales, as $22.7 million of loans were sold in the
second
quarter, compared to $20.7 million in the prior quarter.
Compared to the
second
quarter of
2015
, noninterest income for the
second
quarter of
2016
increased
$69,000
or
1.6%
. The increase was primarily related to a
$393,000
increase in gain on sales of investment securities, a
$183,000
increase in deposit fees and a
$181,000
increase in other income, partially offset by a
$597,000
decrease in gain on the sale and a
$91,000
decrease in loan servicing fees.
For the first six months of
2016
, noninterest income totaled
$9.3 million
, an increase from
$5.9 million
for the first six months of
2015
. The increase was primarily related to higher net gain from sale of loans of
$1.3 million
, net gain from sales of investment securities of
$1.0 million
and a $759,000 recovery on a pre-acquisition loan charge-off recognized in the first quarter of 2016.
53
Table of Contents
Noninterest Expense
Noninterest expense totaled
$23.7 million
for the
second
quarter of
2016
, an increase of
$48,000
or
0.2%
, compared with the
first
quarter of
2016
. Offsetting lower merger related expenses were increased compensation costs attributable primarily to higher staffing levels, resulting from the SCAF acquisition and staffing increases at the Bank, an increase in the off-balance sheet reserve, as well as an adjustment in core deposit intangible ("CDI") amortization related to the SCAF acquisition.
In comparison to the
second
quarter of
2015
, noninterest expense grew by
$6.5 million
or
37.6%
. The increase in expense was primarily related to the additional costs from the personnel and branches retained from the acquisition of SCAF, combined with our continued investment in personnel to support our organic growth in loans and deposits.
For the first six months of
2016
, noninterest expense totaled
$47.3 million
, an increase of
$9.7 million
or
25.6%
from the first six months of
2015
. The increase in expense was primarily related to higher compensation and benefits costs of
$6.4 million
and growth in premises and occupancy expense of
$1.1 million
.
The Company’s efficiency ratio was
54.4%
for the
second
quarter of
2016
, compared to
52.4%
for the
first
quarter of
2016
and
53.7%
for the
second
quarter of
2015
. The Company's efficiency ratio was
53.4%
for the first six months of
2016
, compared to
58.4%
for the first six months of
2015
.
Income Taxes
For the three months ended
June 30, 2016
and
2015
, income tax expense was
$6.4 million
and
$4.6 million
, respectively, and the effective income tax rate was
38.0%
and
37.0%
, respectively. For the
six
months ended
June 30, 2016
and
2015
, income tax expense was
$12.1 million
and
$5.7 million
, respectively, and the effective tax rate was
39.0%
and
37.1%
, respectively.
The Company did not have unrecognized tax benefits that related to uncertainties associated with federal and state income tax matters as of
June 30, 2016
and
December 31, 2015
.
The Company and its subsidiaries are subject to U.S. Federal income tax as well as income tax in multiple state jurisdictions. The statute of limitations related to the consolidated Federal income tax returns is closed for all tax years up to and including 2011. The expiration of the statute of limitations related to the various state income and franchise tax returns varies by state. Independence Bank, an acquired entity, is currently under examination by the California Franchise Tax Board (FTB) for the 2010 and 2011 tax years. While the outcome of the examinations is unknown, the Company expects no material adjustments.
The Company accounts for income taxes by recognizing deferred tax assets and liabilities based upon temporary differences between the amounts for financial reporting purposes and tax basis of its assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion, or all, of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. In assessing the realization of deferred tax assets, management evaluates both positive and negative evidence, including the existence of any cumulative losses in the current year and the prior two years, the amount of taxes paid in available carry-back years, the forecasts of future income, applicable tax planning strategies, and assessments of current and future economic and business conditions. This analysis is updated quarterly and adjusted as necessary. Based on the analysis, the Company has determined that a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets was not required as of
June 30, 2016
.
54
Table of Contents
FINANCIAL CONDITION
At
June 30, 2016
, assets totaled
$3.60 billion
, an increase of
$808 million
or
29.0%
from
December 31, 2015
. The increase in assets since
December 31, 2015
was impacted by the acquisition of SCAF, which at closing added
$715 million
in assets including
$456 million
in loans,
$190 million
in investment securities and
$51.1 million
in goodwill. Additionally, organic loan growth, contributed to the increase in assets during the during the
second
quarter of
2016
.
Loans
Net loans held for investment totaled
$2.90 billion
at
June 30, 2016
, an increase of
$665 million
or
29.7%
from
December 31, 2015
. The increase since
December 31, 2015
was primarily related to loans acquired from SCAF of
$456 million
at acquisition date, as well as our organic loan originations. Combined, loan growth included increases in commercial and industrial loans of
$198 million
, multifamily loans of
$185 million
, commercial owner occupied loans of
$148 million
, commercial non-owner occupied loans
$105 million
, franchise loans of
$74.9 million
, construction loans of
$46.0 million
, one-to-four family loans of
$26.5 million
and SBA loans of
$23.8 million
, offset by a decrease in warehouse mortgage loans of
$143 million
.
The total end of period weighted average contractual interest rate on loans, excluding fees and discounts, at
June 30, 2016
was
4.88%
, compared to
4.90%
at
December 31, 2015
.
55
Table of Contents
The following table sets forth the composition of our loan portfolio in dollar amounts, as a percentage of the portfolio and gives the weighted average interest rate by loan category at the dates indicated:
June 30, 2016
At December 31, 2015
Amount
Percent
of Total
Weighted
Average
Interest Rate
Amount
Percent
of Total
Weighted
Average
Interest Rate
(dollars in thousands)
Business loans:
Commercial and industrial
$
508,141
17.4
%
4.79
%
$
309,741
13.7
%
5.00
%
Franchise
403,855
13.8
5.35
328,925
14.5
5.50
Commercial owner occupied (1)
443,060
15.1
5.01
294,726
13.0
5.00
SBA
86,076
2.9
5.73
62,256
2.8
5.50
Warehouse facilities
—
—
—
143,200
6.3
3.90
Real estate loans:
Commercial non-owner occupied
526,362
18.0
4.83
421,583
18.7
4.90
Multi-family
613,573
21.0
4.37
429,003
19.0
4.60
One-to-four family (2)
106,538
3.6
4.41
80,050
3.5
4.50
Construction
215,786
7.4
5.40
169,748
7.5
5.40
Land
18,341
0.6
5.20
18,340
0.8
5.20
Other loans
5,822
0.2
5.75
5,111
0.2
5.20
Total gross loans (3)
2,927,554
100.0
%
4.88
%
2,262,683
100.0
%
4.90
%
Less loans held for sale
10,116
8,565
Total gross loans held for investment
2,917,438
2,254,118
Deferred loan origination costs/(fees) and premiums/(discounts), net
3,181
197
Allowance for loan losses
(18,955
)
(17,317
)
Loans held for investment, net
$
2,901,664
$
2,236,998
______________________________
(1) Majority secured by real estate.
(2) Includes second trust deeds.
(3) Total gross loans for June 30, 2016 are net of the unaccreted mark-to-market discounts of
$12.7 million
.
56
Table of Contents
The following table sets forth the weighted average interest rates, weighted average number of months to reprice and the periods to repricing for our gross loan portfolio at the date indicated:
June 30, 2016
Periods to Repricing
Number of Loans
Amount
Weighted
Average Interest Rate
Weighted
Average Months to Reprice
(dollars in thousands)
1 Year and less
2,109
$
948,493
5.11
%
16.54
Over 1 Year to 3 Years
428
511,212
4.58
25.66
Over 3 Years to 5 Years
583
742,470
4.64
48.75
Over 5 Years to 7 Years
89
162,282
4.47
73.89
Over 7 Years to 10 Years
40
73,909
4.64
99.85
Total adjustable
3,249
2,438,366
4.80
28.89
Fixed
1,421
479,072
5.15
Total
4,670
$
2,917,438
4.88
Delinquent Loans.
When a borrower fails to make required payments on a loan and does not cure the delinquency within 30 days, we normally record a notice of default and, after providing the required notices to the borrower, commence foreclosure proceedings. If the loan is not reinstated within the time permitted by law, we may sell the property at a foreclosure sale. At these foreclosure sales, we generally acquire title to the property. At
June 30, 2016
and
December 31, 2015
, loans delinquent 30 or more days as a percentage of total gross loans was
0.19%
, comparable to
0.12%
at
December 31, 2015
.
57
Table of Contents
The following table sets forth delinquencies in the Company’s loan portfolio at the dates indicated:
30 - 59 Days
60 - 89 Days
90 Days or More (1)
Total
# of
Loans
Principal
Balance
of Loans
# of
Loans
Principal
Balance
of Loans
# of
Loans
Principal
Balance
of Loans
# of
Loans
Principal
Balance
of Loans
(dollars in thousands)
At June 30, 2016
Business loans:
Commercial and industrial
3
$
1,144
—
$
—
2
$
32
5
$
1,176
Franchise
—
—
—
—
1
1,461
1
1,461
Commercial owner occupied
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
SBA
—
—
—
—
1
246
1
246
Real estate loans:
Commercial non-owner occupied
—
—
1
2,487
—
—
1
2,487
One-to-four family
—
—
—
—
2
40
2
40
Construction
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Land
—
—
—
—
1
18
1
18
Other
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Total
3
$
1,144
1
$
2,487
7
$
1,797
11
$
5,428
Delinquent loans to total gross loans
0.04
%
0.08
%
0.06
%
0.19
%
At December 31, 2015
Business loans:
Commercial and industrial
2
20
—
—
1
257
3
277
Franchise
—
—
—
—
3
1,630
3
1,630
Commercial owner occupied
—
—
1
355
—
—
1
355
Real estate loans:
Commercial non-owner occupied
1
214
—
—
—
—
1
214
One-to-four family
1
89
—
—
2
46
3
135
Land
—
—
—
—
1
21
1
21
Total
4
$
323
1
$
355
7
$
1,954
12
$
2,632
Delinquent loans to total gross loans
0.01
%
0.02
%
0.09
%
0.12
%
______________________________
(1) All loans that are delinquent 90 days or more are on nonaccrual status and reported as part of nonperforming loans.
58
Table of Contents
Allowance for Loan Losses
. The ALLL represents an estimate of probable losses inherent in our loan portfolio and is based on our continual review of credit quality of the loan portfolio. The allowance contains a specific reserve component for loans that are determined to be impaired and a general reserve component for loans without credit impairment. The general reserve is determined by applying a systematically derived loss factor to individual segments of the loan portfolio. The adequacy and appropriateness of the ALLL and the individual loss factors are reviewed each quarter by management.
The loss factor for each segment of our loan portfolio is generally based on our actual historical loss rate experience supplemented by management judgment for certain segments where we lack loss history experience. We also consider historical charge-off rates for the last 10 and 15 years for commercial banks and savings institutions headquartered in California as collected and reported by the FDIC. The loss factor is adjusted by qualitative adjustment factors to arrive at a final loss factor for each loan portfolio segment. For additional information regarding the qualitative adjustments, please see “Allowances for Loan Losses” as discussed in our 2015 Annual Report. The qualitative factors allow management to assess current trends within our loan portfolio and the economic environment to incorporate their effect when calculating the ALLL. The final loss factors are applied to pass graded loans within our loan portfolio. Higher factors are applied to loans graded below pass, including classified and criticized assets.
No assurance can be given that we will not, in any particular period, sustain loan losses that exceed the amount reserved, or that subsequent evaluation of our loan portfolio, in light of the prevailing factors, including economic conditions which may adversely affect our market area or other circumstances, will not require significant increases in the loan loss allowance. In addition, regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review our ALLL and may require us to recognize additional provisions to increase the allowance or take charge-offs in anticipation of future losses.
At
June 30, 2016
, our ALLL was
$19.0 million
, an increase of
$1.6 million
from
December 31, 2015
. The increase in the allowance for loan losses at
June 30, 2016
was mainly attributable to the growth in the multi-family segment of the loan portfolio, which resulted primarily from a purchase of a multi-family loan pool. At
June 30, 2016
, given the composition of our loan portfolio, the ALLL was considered adequate to cover estimated losses inherent in the loan portfolio. Should any of the factors considered by management in evaluating the appropriate level of the ALLL change, the Company’s estimate of probable loan losses could also change, which could affect the level of future provisions for loan losses.
59
Table of Contents
The following table sets forth the Company’s ALLL and its corresponding percentage of the loan category balance and the percent of loan balance to total gross loans in each of the loan categories listed for the periods indicated:
June 30, 2016
December 31, 2015
Balance at End of Period Applicable to
Amount
Allowance as a % of Category Total
% of Loans in Category to
Total Loans
Amount
Allowance as a % of Category Total
% of Loans in Category to
Total Loans
(dollars in thousands)
Business loans:
Commercial and industrial
$
4,485
0.88
%
17.4
%
$
3,449
1.11
%
13.7
%
Franchise
3,252
0.81
13.8
3,124
0.95
14.5
Commercial owner occupied
2,141
0.48
15.1
1,870
0.63
13.0
SBA
1,559
1.81
2.9
1,500
2.41
2.8
Warehouse facilities
—
—
—
759
0.53
6.3
Real estate loans:
Commercial non-owner occupied
2,104
0.40
18.0
2,048
0.49
18.7
Multi-family
2,334
0.38
21.0
1,583
0.37
19.0
One-to-four family
607
0.57
3.6
698
0.87
3.5
Construction
2,245
1.04
7.4
2,030
1.20
7.5
Land
204
1.11
0.6
233
1.27
0.8
Other Loans
24
0.41
0.2
23
0.45
0.2
Total
$
18,955
0.65
%
100.0
%
$
17,317
0.77
%
100.0
%
The ALLL as a percent of nonaccrual loans was
466.64%
at
June 30, 2016
, an increase from
436.20%
at
December 31, 2015
. At
June 30, 2016
, the ratio of ALLL to total gross loans was
0.65%
, a decrease from
0.77%
at
December 31, 2015
. The decrease in this ratio at
June 30, 2016
from
December 31, 2015
is attributable to the loans acquired from SCAF, recorded at fair value, which did not necessitate an allowance against them. Our ratio of ALLL plus the remaining unamortized credit discount on the loans acquired to total gross loans was
0.89%
at
June 30, 2016
, a decrease from
0.91%
at
December 31, 2015
.
60
Table of Contents
The following table sets forth the activity within the Company’s ALLL in each of the loan categories listed for the periods indicated:
Three Months Ended
Six Months Ended
June 30,
March 31,
June 30,
June 30,
June 30,
2016
2016
2015
2016
2015
(dollars in thousands)
Balance, beginning of period
$
18,455
$
17,317
$
13,646
$
17,317
$
12,200
Provision for loan losses
1,589
1,120
1,833
2,709
3,663
Charge-offs:
Business loans:
Commercial and industrial
(710
)
—
—
(710
)
(24
)
Franchise
(169
)
—
(393
)
(169
)
(765
)
Commercial owner occupied
(329
)
—
—
(329
)
—
SBA
(5
)
—
—
(5
)
—
Real estate:
Commercial non-owner occupied
—
—
—
—
—
One-to-four family
(7
)
—
—
(7
)
—
Total charge-offs
(1,220
)
—
(393
)
(1,220
)
(789
)
Recoveries :
Business loans:
Commercial and industrial
40
14
12
54
24
SBA
82
3
1
85
1
Real estate:
Commercial non-owner occupied
—
—
—
—
—
One-to-four family
5
1
—
6
—
Other loans
4
—
1
4
1
Total recoveries
131
18
14
149
26
Net loan (charge-offs) recoveries
(1,089
)
18
(379
)
(1,071
)
(763
)
Balance at end of period
$
18,955
$
18,455
$
15,100
$
18,955
$
15,100
Ratios:
Net charge-offs (recoveries) to average total loans, net
0.04
%
—
%
0.02
%
0.04
%
0.04
%
Allowance for loan losses to gross loans at end of period
0.65
%
0.65
%
0.71
%
0.65
%
0.71
%
Investment Securities
We primarily use our investment portfolio for liquidity purposes and to support our interest rate risk management strategies. Investment securities available for sale totaled
$245 million
at
June 30, 2016
, a decrease of
$34.8 million
or
12.4%
from
December 31, 2015
. The decrease in investment securities from
December 31, 2015
was primarily due to the sale or maturity of securities available for sale in the amount of
$211 million
, of which $190 million was acquired from SCAF, principal paydowns of $18.2 million and premium amortization of $7.2 million, offset by purchases of $5.1 million and a change in unrealized gain of $3.2 million. The Bank deployed the liquidity from the sale of the SCAF bond portfolio into the purchase of $185 million in multifamily loans.
61
Table of Contents
The following tables set forth the amortized cost, unrealized gains and losses, and estimated fair value of our investment securities portfolio at the dates indicated:
June 30, 2016
Amortized
Cost
Unrealized
Gain
Unrealized
Loss
Estimated
Fair Value
(in thousands)
Available for sale:
Municipal bonds
$
115,755
$
3,044
$
—
$
118,799
Collateralized mortgage obligation
22,570
274
—
22,844
Mortgage-backed securities
103,512
604
(288
)
103,828
Total securities available for sale
$
241,837
$
3,922
$
(288
)
$
245,471
Investment securities held to maturity:
Mortgage-backed securities
8,076
98
—
8,174
Other
1,216
—
—
1,216
Total securities held to maturity
9,292
98
—
9,390
Total securities
$
251,129
$
4,020
$
(288
)
$
254,861
December 31, 2015
Amortized
Cost
Unrealized
Gain
Unrealized
Loss
Estimated
Fair Value
(in thousands)
Available for sale:
Municipal bonds
$
128,546
$
1,796
$
(97
)
$
130,245
Collateralized mortgage obligation
24,722
4
(183
)
24,543
Mortgage-backed securities
126,443
153
(1,111
)
125,485
Total securities available for sale
$
279,711
$
1,953
$
(1,391
)
$
280,273
Held to maturity:
Mortgage-backed securities
8,400
—
(70
)
8,330
Other
1,242
—
—
1,242
Total securities held to maturity
9,642
—
(70
)
9,572
Total securities
$
289,353
$
1,953
$
(1,461
)
$
289,845
62
Table of Contents
The following table sets forth the fair values and weighted average yields on our investment securities available for sale portfolio by contractual maturity at the date indicated:
June 30, 2016
One Year
or Less
More than One
to Five Years
More than Five Years
to Ten Years
More than
Ten Years
Total
Fair
Value
Weighted
Average
Yield
Fair
Value
Weighted
Average
Yield
Fair
Value
Weighted
Average
Yield
Fair
Value
Weighted
Average
Yield
Fair
Value
Weighted
Average
Yield
(dollars in thousands)
Available for sale:
Municipal bonds
$
1,416
0.79
%
$
28,806
1.40
%
$
38,956
1.97
%
$
49,621
1.91
%
$
118,799
1.79
%
Collateralized mortgage obligation
—
—
—
—
—
—
22,844
1.78
22,844
1.78
Mortgage-backed securities
—
—
—
—
21,143
1.76
82,685
1.48
103,828
1.54
Total securities available for sale
$
1,416
0.79
%
$
28,806
1.40
%
$
60,099
1.90
%
$
155,150
1.66
%
$
245,471
1.68
%
Held to maturity:
Mortgage-backed securities
—
—
—
—
—
—
8,174
2.74
8,174
2.74
Other
—
—
—
—
—
—
1,216
0.93
1,216
0.93
Total securities held to maturity
—
—
—
—
—
—
$
9,390
2.50
%
$
9,390
2.50
%
Total securities
$
1,416
0.79
%
$
28,806
1.40
%
$
60,099
1.90
%
$
164,540
1.71
%
$
254,861
1.62
%
Each quarter, we review individual securities classified as available for sale to determine whether a decline in fair value below the amortized cost basis is other-than-temporary. If it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the debt security, an OTTI write-down is recorded against the security and a loss recognized.
In determining if a security has an OTTI loss, we consider the 1) length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less then amortized cost; 2) financial condition and near term prospects of the issuer; 3) impact of changes in market interest rates; and 4) intent and ability of the Company to retain its investment for a period of time sufficient to allow any anticipated recovery in fair value and whether it is not more likely than not the Company would be required to sell the security. We estimate OTTI losses on a security primarily through:
•
An evaluation of the present value of estimated cash flows from the security using the current yield to accrete beneficial interest and including assumptions in the prepayment rate, default rate, delinquencies, loss severity and percentage of nonperforming assets;
•
An evaluation of the estimated payback period to recover principal;
•
An analysis of the credit support available in the underlying security to absorb losses; and
•
A review of the financial condition and near term prospects of the issuer.
63
Table of Contents
During the quarter ended
June 30, 2016
,
December 31, 2015
and
June 30, 2015
, there were no OTTI recoveries. We recorded no impairment credit losses on available-for-sale securities in our consolidated statement of operations for the three months ended
June 30, 2016
,
December 31, 2015
and
June 30, 2015
. We recorded a $207,000 impairment during the first quarter of 2016 related to a held-to-maturity equity investment.
Nonperforming Assets
Nonperforming assets consist of loans on which we have ceased accruing interest (nonaccrual loans), restructured loans and OREO. It is our general policy to account for a loan as nonaccrual when the loan becomes 90 days delinquent or when collection of interest appears doubtful.
Nonperforming assets totaled
$4.8 million
, or
0.13%
of total assets at
June 30, 2016
, a decrease from
$5.1 million
, or
0.18%
of total assets at
December 31, 2015
. At
June 30, 2016
, nonperforming loans increased $92,000 from
December 31, 2015
.
The following table sets forth our composition of nonperforming assets at the dates indicated:
June 30, 2016
December 31, 2015
(dollars in thousands)
Nonperforming assets
Business loans:
Commercial and industrial
$
1,220
$
463
Franchise
1,461
1,630
Commercial owner occupied
486
536
SBA
329
—
Real estate:
Commercial non-owner occupied
411
1,164
One-to-four family
137
155
Land
18
21
Other loans
—
1
Total nonaccrual loans
4,062
3,970
Other real estate owned:
One-to-four family
—
—
Land
711
1,161
Total other real estate owned
711
1,161
Total nonperforming assets, net
$
4,773
$
5,131
Allowance for loan losses
$
18,955
$
17,317
Allowance for loan losses as a percent of
total nonperforming loans
466.64
%
436.20
%
Nonperforming loans as a percent of gross loans
0.14
0.18
Nonperforming assets as a percent of total assets
0.13
0.18
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Total liabilities were
$3.16 billion
at
June 30, 2016
, compared to
$2.49 billion
at
December 31, 2015
. The increase of
$666 million
or
26.7%
from
December 31, 2015
was primarily related to the acquisition of SCAF, which added
$645 million
in assumed liabilities at the acquisition date.
64
Table of Contents
Deposits.
At
June 30, 2016
, deposits totaled
$2.93 billion
, an increase of
$736 million
or
33.5%
from
December 31, 2015
. The increase in deposits since
December 31, 2015
included increases in noninterest bearing checking of
$332 million
, money market and savings accounts of
$272 million
, retail certificate of deposits of
$54.8 million
, wholesale/brokered certificate of deposits of
$43.8 million
and demand deposit of
$33.7 million
. The increase in deposits during the first
six
months of
2016
was due to organic growth and the acquisition of SCAF, which added
$637 million
in deposits.
The total end of period weighted average rate of deposits at
June 30, 2016
was
0.31%
, a decrease from
0.32%
December 31, 2015
.
At
June 30, 2016
, our gross loan to deposit ratio was
100.0%
, a decrease from
103.1%
at
December 31, 2015
.
The following table sets forth the distribution of the Company’s deposit accounts at the dates indicated and the weighted average interest rates on each category of deposits presented:
June 30, 2016
December 31, 2015
Balance
% of Total Deposits
Weighted Average Rate
Balance
% of Total Deposits
Weighted Average Rate
(dollars in thousands)
Noninterest bearing checking
$
1,043,361
35.6
%
0.00
%
$
711,771
32.4
%
—
%
Interest-bearing deposits:
Checking
168,669
5.8
0.11
134,999
6.1
0.11
Money market
1,002,412
34.2
0.38
743,871
33.9
0.35
Savings
97,033
3.3
1.50
83,507
3.8
0.15
Time deposit accounts:
Less than 1.00%
448,589
15.3
0.61
346,693
15.8
0.61
1.00 - 1.99
163,616
5.6
1.16
172,218
7.8
1.16
2.00 - 2.99
6,843
0.2
2.24
1,401
0.1
2.26
3.00 - 3.99
27
—
3.83
20
—
3.81
4.00 - 4.99
3
—
4.93
3
—
4.93
5.00 and greater
448
—
5.07
640
—
5.19
Total time deposit accounts
619,526
21.1
0.77
520,975
23.7
0.80
Total interest-bearing deposits
1,887,640
64.4
0.47
1,483,352
67.6
0.48
Total deposits
$
2,931,001
100.0
%
0.31
%
$
2,195,123
100.0
%
0.32
%
Borrowings.
At
June 30, 2016
, total borrowings amounted to
$191 million
, a decrease of
$76 million
or
28.5%
from
December 31, 2015
. At
June 30, 2016
, total borrowings represented
5.3%
of total assets and had an end of period weighted average rate of 2.7%, compared with
9.5%
of total assets at a weighted average rate of 2.0% at
December 31, 2015
.
65
Table of Contents
At
June 30, 2016
, total borrowings were comprised of the following:
•
Overnight FHLB advances of $75 million at .59%;
•
Subordinated notes of $60 million at 5.75% due September 3, 2024. For additional information about the Subordinated notes, see Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this report;
•
One 24 month fixed FHLB advance of $25 million at .84% due September 15, 2016;
•
Three reverse repurchase agreements totaling $28.5 million at a weighted average rate of 3.26% with $10 million due in February 2018 and $18.5 million due in September 2018. These agreements are secured by government sponsored entity MBS securities with a par value of
$32.6 million
and a fair value of
$34.1 million
;
•
HOA reverse repurchase agreements totaling $16.8 million at a weighted average rate of .01% and secured by government sponsored entity MBS securities with a par value of
$26.9 million
and a fair value of
$27.9 million
; and
•
Subordinated debentures used to fund the issuance of Trust Preferred Securities in 2004 of $10.3 million at 3.04% due April 7, 2034. For additional information about the Subordinated Debentures and Trust Preferred Securities, see Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this report.
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the Company’s borrowed funds at the dates indicated:
June 30, 2016
December 31, 2015
Balance
Weighted
Average Rate
Balance
Weighted
Average Rate
(dollars in thousands)
FHLB advances
$
75,000
0.59
%
$
148,000
0.42
%
Reverse repurchase agreements
45,252
2.07
%
48,125
1.94
%
Subordinated debentures
70,310
5.35
%
70,310
5.35
%
Total borrowings
$
190,562
2.65
%
$
266,435
2.00
%
Weighted average cost of
borrowings during the quarter
3.08
%
2.27
%
Borrowings as a percent of total assets
5.3
%
9.6
%
Stockholders’ Equity.
Total stockholders’ equity was
$441 million
as of
June 30, 2016
, an increase from
$299 million
at
December 31, 2015
. The current year increase of
$142 million
in stockholders’ equity was primarily related to equity consideration of
$119 million
associated with the acquisition of SCAF, and net income for the first
six
months of
2016
of
$18.9 million
.
Our book value per share increased to
$15.94
at
June 30, 2016
from
$13.86
at
December 31, 2015
. At
June 30, 2016
, the Company’s tangible common equity to tangible assets ratio was
9.41%
, an increase from
8.82%
at
December 31, 2015
.
66
Table of Contents
Tangible common equity to tangible assets (the “tangible common equity ratio”) is a non-GAAP financial measure derived from GAAP-based amounts. We calculate the tangible common equity ratio by excluding the balance of intangible assets from common shareholders’ equity and dividing by tangible assets. We believe that this information is important to shareholders as tangible equity is a measure that is consistent with the calculation of capital for bank regulatory purposes, which excludes intangible assets from the calculation of risk-based ratios.
PACIFIC PREMIER BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
GAAP Reconciliation
(dollars in thousands)
June 30,
December 31,
2016
2015
Total stockholders’ equity
$
440,630
$
298,980
Less: Intangible assets
(112,439
)
(58,002
)
Tangible common equity
$
328,191
$
240,978
Total assets
$
3,598,653
$
2,790,646
Less: Intangible assets
(112,439
)
(58,002
)
Tangible assets
$
3,486,214
$
2,732,644
Tangible common equity ratio
9.41
%
8.82
%
CAPITAL RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY
Our primary sources of funds are deposits, advances from the FHLB and other borrowings, principal and interest payments on loans, and income from investments. While maturities and scheduled amortization of loans are a predictable source of funds, deposit inflows and outflows as well as loan prepayments are greatly influenced by general interest rates, economic conditions, and competition.
Our primary sources of funds generated during the first
six
months of
2016
were from:
•
Proceeds from the sale or maturity of securities available for sale of
$211 million
•
Proceeds of $333 million from the sale and principal payments on loans held for investment;
•
Net change of $193 million of undisbursed loan funds; and
•
Net increase of
$99 million
in deposit accounts.
We used these funds to:
•
Purchase and originate loans held for investment of $735 million; and
•
Reduce borrowings by $76 million.
Our most liquid assets are unrestricted cash and short-term investments. The levels of these assets are dependent on our operating, lending and investing activities during any given period. Our liquidity position is continuously monitored and adjustments are made to the balance between sources and uses of funds as deemed appropriate. At
June 30, 2016
, cash and cash equivalents totaled
$185 million
and the market value of our investment securities available for sale totaled
$245 million
. If additional funds are needed, we have additional sources of liquidity that can be accessed, including FHLB advances, federal fund lines, the Federal Reserve’s lending programs and loan sales. As of
June 30, 2016
, the maximum amount we could borrow through the FHLB was $1.60 billion, of which $557 million was available for borrowing based on collateral pledged of $629 million in real estate loans. At
June 30, 2016
, we had
$75 million
in FHLB borrowings against that available balance. At
June 30, 2016
, we also had unsecured lines of credit aggregating $176 million, which consisted of $123 million with
67
Table of Contents
other financial institutions from which to draw funds and $3.3 million with the Federal Reserve Bank and one reverse repo line with a correspondent bank of $50 million. For the quarter ended
June 30, 2016
, our average liquidity ratio was
12.44%
, which is above the Company's policy of 10.0%. The Company regularly models liquidity stress scenarios to ensure that adequate liquidity is available and has contingency funding plans in place which are reviewed and tested on a regular basis.
To the extent that
2016
deposit growth is not sufficient to satisfy our ongoing commitments to fund maturing and withdrawable deposits, repay maturing borrowings, fund existing and future loans, or make investments, we may access funds through our FHLB borrowing arrangement, unsecured lines of credit or other sources.
The Bank has a policy in place that permits the purchase of brokered funds, in an amount not to exceed 15% of total deposits, as a secondary source for funding. At
June 30, 2016
, we had
$199 million
in brokered time deposits, which constituted
6.8%
of total deposits at that date.
The Corporation is a corporate entity separate and apart from the Bank that must provide for its own liquidity. The Corporation's primary sources of liquidity are dividends from the Bank. There are statutory and regulatory provisions that limit the ability of the Bank to pay dividends to the Corporation. Management believes that such restrictions will not have a material impact on the ability of the Corporation to meet its ongoing cash obligations.
The Corporation has never declared or paid dividends on its common stock and does not anticipate declaring or paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. The Corporation’s board of directors authorized in June 2012 a stock repurchase plan, which allows the Corporation to proactively manage its capital position and return excess capital to its stockholders. The repurchase plan authorizes the repurchase of up to 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. Shares purchased under such plans also provide the Corporation with shares of common stock necessary to satisfy obligations related to stock compensation awards. Also, please see Part II, Item 2 - Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds for additional information.
Contractual Obligations and Off-Balance Sheet Commitments
Contractual Obligations
.
The Company enters into contractual obligations in the normal course of business primarily as a source of funds for its asset growth and to meet required capital needs.
The following schedule summarizes maturities and payments due on our obligations and commitments, excluding accrued interest, as of the date indicated:
June 30, 2016
Less than 1 year
1 - 3 years
3 - 5 years
More than 5 years
Total
(in thousands)
Contractual obligations
FHLB advances
$
75,000
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
75,000
Other borrowings
16,752
28,500
—
—
45,252
Subordinated debentures
—
—
—
70,310
70,310
Certificates of deposit
471,544
144,044
3,258
680
619,526
Operating leases
4,333
6,251
2,018
297
12,899
Total contractual cash obligations
$
567,629
$
178,795
$
5,276
$
71,287
$
822,987
Off-Balance Sheet Commitments
.
We utilize off-balance sheet commitments in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of our customers and to reduce our own exposure to fluctuations in interest
68
Table of Contents
rates. These financial instruments include commitments to originate real estate, business and other loans held for investment, undisbursed loan funds, lines and letters of credit, and commitments to purchase loans and investment securities for portfolio. The contract or notional amounts of those instruments reflect the extent of involvement we have in particular classes of financial instruments.
Commitments to originate loans held for investment are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the commitment. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since some commitments expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. Undisbursed loan funds and unused lines of credit on home equity and commercial loans include committed funds not disbursed. Letters of credit are conditional commitments we issue to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. As of
June 30, 2016
, we had commitments to extend credit on existing lines and letters of credit of $625 million, compared to $415 million at
December 31, 2015
and $381 million at
June 30, 2015
.
The following table summarizes our contractual commitments with off-balance sheet risk by expiration period at the date indicated:
June 30, 2016
Less than 1 year
1 - 5 years
3 - 5 years
More than 5 years
Total
(in thousands)
Other commitments
Commercial and industrial
$
282,486
$
53,772
$
6,722
$
14,234
$
357,214
Construction
91,870
96,421
—
1,178
189,469
Home equity lines of credit
1,949
3,745
4,469
13,890
24,053
Standby letters of credit
13,127
—
—
—
13,127
All other
30,380
4,616
—
5,985
40,981
Total other commitments
$
419,812
$
158,554
$
11,191
$
35,287
$
624,844
Regulatory Capital Compliance
The Company and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory, and possibly additional discretionary, actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company’s and the Bank’s financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Company and the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Company’s and the Bank’s assets, liabilities and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Company’s and the Bank’s capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors.
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Bank to maintain capital in order to meet certain capital ratios to be considered adequately capitalized or well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. As of the most recent formal notification from the Federal Reserve, the Company and the Bank was categorized as “well capitalized.” There are no conditions or events since that notification that management believes have changed the Bank’s categorization.
New comprehensive regulatory capital rules for U.S. banking organizations pursuant to the capital framework of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, generally referred to as “Basel III”, became effective for the Company and the Bank on January 1, 2015, subject to phase-in periods for certain of their components and other provisions. The most significant of the provisions of the New Capital Rules which applied to the Company and the Bank were as follows: the phase-out of trust preferred securities from Tier 1 capital, the higher risk-
69
Table of Contents
weighting of high volatility and past due real estate loans and the capital treatment of deferred tax assets and liabilities above certain thresholds.
Beginning January 1, 2016, Basel III implemented a requirement for all banking organizations to maintain a capital conservation buffer above the minimum risk-based capital requirements in order to avoid certain limitations on capital distributions, stock repurchases and discretionary bonus payments to executive officers. The capital conservation buffer is exclusively comprised of common equity tier 1 capital, and it applies to each of the three risk-based capital ratios but not to the leverage ratio. At March 31, 2016, the Company and Bank are in compliance with the capital conservation buffer requirement. The capital conservation buffer will increase by 0.625% each year through 2019, at which point, the common equity tier 1, tier 1 and total capital ratio minimums inclusive of the capital consevation buffer will be 7.0%, 8.5% and 10.5%, respectively.
70
Table of Contents
As defined in applicable regulations and set forth in the table below, the Company and the Bank continue to exceed the “well capitalized” standards at the dates indicated:
Actual
Minimum Required for Capital Adequacy Purposes
Required to be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Regulations
Amount
Ratio
Amount
Ratio
Amount
Ratio
(dollars in thousands)
At June 30, 2016
Leverage Ratio
Bank
$
385,190
11.17
%
$
137,999
4.00
%
$
172,498
5.00
%
Consolidated
$
341,304
9.88
%
$
138,161
4.00
%
N/A
N/A
Common Equity Tier 1 to Risk-Weighted Assets
Bank
$
385,190
12.32
%
$
140,748
4.50
%
$
203,303
6.50
%
Consolidated
$
331,352
10.58
%
$
140,899
4.50
%
N/A
N/A
Tier 1 Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets
Bank
$
385,190
12.32
%
$
187,664
6.00
%
$
250,219
8.00
%
Consolidated
$
341,304
10.90
%
$
187,865
6.00
%
N/A
N/A
Total Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets
Bank
$
404,881
12.94
%
$
250,219
8.00
%
$
312,774
10.00
%
Consolidated
$
420,995
13.45
%
$
250,486
8.00
%
N/A
N/A
At December 31, 2015
Leverage Ratio
Bank
$
304,442
11.41
%
$
106,684
4.00
%
$
133,354
5.00
%
Consolidated
$
254,280
9.52
%
$
106,886
4.00
%
N/A
N/A
Common Equity Tier 1 to Risk-Weighted Assets
Bank
$
304,442
12.35
%
$
110,954
4.50
%
$
160,267
6.50
%
Consolidated
$
245,224
9.91
%
$
111,336
4.50
%
N/A
N/A
Tier 1 Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets
Bank
$
304,442
12.35
%
$
147,938
6.00
%
$
197,251
8.00
%
Consolidated
$
254,280
10.28
%
$
148,448
6.00
%
N/A
N/A
Total Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets
Bank
$
322,361
13.07
%
$
197,251
8.00
%
$
246,561
10.00
%
Consolidated
$
332,200
13.43
%
$
197,931
8.00
%
N/A
N/A
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk
Management believes that there have been no material changes in our quantitative and qualitative information about market risk since
December 31, 2015
. For a complete discussion of our quantitative and qualitative market risk, see “Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk” in our
2015
Annual Report.
71
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, an evaluation was carried out by our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.
Changes in Internal Controls
There have not been any changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter to which this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
72
Table of Contents
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
There are no material pending legal proceedings, other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to our business. Management believes that none of the legal proceedings occurring in the ordinary course of business, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse impact on the results of operations or financial condition of the Company.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There were no material changes to the risk factors as previously disclosed under Item 1A of our
2015
Annual Report.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
On June 25, 2012, the board of directors authorized its second stock repurchase program. Under the repurchase program, management is authorized to repurchase up to 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The program may be limited or terminated at any time without prior notice. The following table provides information with respect to purchases made by or on behalf of us or any “affiliated purchaser” (as defined in Rule 10b-18(a)(3) under the Exchange Act) of our common stock during the
second
quarter of
2016
.
Month of Purchase
Total Number of shares purchased/ returned
Average price paid per share
Total number of shares repurchased as part of the publicly announced program
Maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the program at end of month
March-2016
—
—
—
762,545
April-2016
—
—
—
762,545
May-2016
—
—
—
762,545
June-2016
—
—
—
762,545
Total/Average
—
—
—
762,545
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
Item 5. Other Information
None
73
Item 6. Exhibits
Exhibit 3.1
Amendment to Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporations, as ammended (1)
Exhibit 10.1
Employment Agreement by and among Ronald J. Nicolas, Jr., Pacific Premier Bancorp, Inc. and Pacific Premier Bank, dated effective as of May 31, 2016 (1)
Exhibit 10.2
Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement by and among Steven R. Gardner, Pacific Premier Bancorp, Inc. and Pacific Premier Bank, dated effective as of May 31, 2016 (1)
Exhibit 10.3
Third Amended and Restated Employment Agreement by and between Edward Wilcox and Pacific Premier Bank, dated effective as of May 31, 2016 (1)
Exhibit 10.4
Third Amended and Restated Employment Agreement by and between Michael Karr and Pacific Premier Bank, dated effective as of May 31, 2016 (1)
Exhibit 10.5
Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement by and between Thomas Rice and Pacific Premier Bank, dated effective as of May 31, 2016 (1)
Exhibit 31.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15(d)-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
Exhibit 31.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15(d)-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
Exhibit 32
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Exhibit 101.INS
XBRL Instance Document
Exhibit 101.SCH
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
Exhibit 101.CAL
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
Exhibit 101.DEF
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definitions Linkbase Document
Exhibit 101.LAB
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
Exhibit 101.PRE
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
(1)
Incorporated by reference from the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 2, 2016.
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
PACIFIC PREMIER BANCORP, INC.,
August 8, 2016
By:
/s/ Steve Gardner
Date
Steve Gardner
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)
August 8, 2016
By:
/s/ Ronald J. Nicolas, Jr.
Date
Ronald J. Nicolas, Jr.
Sr. Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial and accounting officer)
75
Table of Contents
Index to Exhibits
Exhibit 3.1
Amendment to Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporations, as ammended (1)
Exhibit 10.1
Employment Agreement by and among Ronald J. Nicolas, Jr., Pacific Premier Bancorp, Inc. and Pacific Premier Bank, dated effective as of May 31, 2016 (1)
Exhibit 10.2
Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement by and among Steven R. Gardner, Pacific Premier Bancorp, Inc. and Pacific Premier Bank, dated effective as of May 31, 2016 (1)
Exhibit 10.3
Third Amended and Restated Employment Agreement by and between Edward Wilcox and Pacific Premier Bank, dated effective as of May 31, 2016 (1)
Exhibit 10.4
Third Amended and Restated Employment Agreement by and between Michael Karr and Pacific Premier Bank, dated effective as of May 31, 2016 (1)
Exhibit 10.5
Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement by and between Thomas Rice and Pacific Premier Bank, dated effective as of May 31, 2016 (1)
Exhibit 31.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15(d)-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
Exhibit 31.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15(d)-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
Exhibit 32
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Exhibit 101.INS
XBRL Instance Document
Exhibit 101.SCH
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
Exhibit 101.CAL
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
Exhibit 101.DEF
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definitions Linkbase Document
Exhibit 101.LAB
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
Exhibit 101.PRE
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
(1) Incorporated by reference from the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 2, 2016.
76