UNITED STATES
x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003
OR
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
For the transition period from (not applicable)
Commission file number 1-6880
U.S. BANCORP
800 Nicollet Mall
612-973-1111
(not applicable)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding twelve months, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
YES X NO
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrants classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of Contents and Form 10-Q Cross Reference Index
Forward-Looking Statements
Managements Discussion and Analysis" -->
OVERVIEW
Earnings SummaryU.S. Bancorp and its subsidiaries (the Company) reported net income of $953.6 million for the second quarter of 2003, or $.49 per diluted share, compared with $823.1 million, or $.43 per diluted share, for the second quarter of 2002. Return on average assets and return on average equity were 2.04 percent and 20.0 percent, respectively, for the second quarter of 2003, compared with returns of 1.95 percent and 20.0 percent, respectively, for the second quarter of 2002. The Companys results for the second quarter of 2003 improved over the second quarter of 2002, primarily due to growth in net revenue and a slight decline in credit costs, partially offset by a modest increase in expense. A notable item in the second quarter of 2003 was gains on the sale of securities of $213.1 million, an increase of $182.5 million over the second quarter of 2002. The gains on the sale of securities represent an economic hedge to a mortgage servicing rights (MSR) impairment of $196.3 million recognized in the second quarter of 2003, caused by declining interest rates and related prepayments. Net income for the second quarter of 2003 also included after-tax merger and restructuring-related items of $7.2 million ($10.8 million on a pre-tax basis), compared with after-tax merger and restructuring-related items of $46.7 million ($71.6 million on a pre-tax basis) for the second quarter of 2002. The $60.8 million decline in pre-tax merger and restructuring-related charges was primarily due to the completion of integration activities associated with the merger of Firstar Corporation (Firstar) and the former U.S. Bancorp (USBM). Refer to the Merger and Restructuring-Related Items section for further discussion on merger and restructuring-related items.
Acquisition and Divestiture ActivityThe following transactions were accounted for as purchases from the date of completion. On December 31, 2002, the Company acquired the corporate trust business of State Street Bank and Trust Company in a cash transaction. The transaction represented total assets acquired of $682 million and total liabilities assumed of $39 million at the closing date.
Planned Spin-Off of Piper Jaffray CompaniesOn February 19, 2003, the Company announced that its Board of Directors approved a plan to effect a spin-off of its capital markets business unit, including the investment banking and brokerage activities primarily conducted by its wholly-owned subsidiary, U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray Companies (Piper Jaffray Companies). As of December 31, 2002, Piper Jaffray Companies had assets of $2.1 billion. During 2002, Piper Jaffray Companies generated revenue of $729.1 million (5.7 percent of total consolidated revenue) and contributed $.1 million of net income, representing less than 1 percent of the Companys consolidated net income.
STATEMENT OF INCOME ANALYSIS
Net Interest IncomeThe second quarter of 2003 net interest income, on a taxable-equivalent basis, was $1,805.9 million, compared with $1,689.8 million for the second quarter of 2002, which represented a $116.1 million (6.9 percent) increase over 2002. Year-to-date net interest income, on a taxable-equivalent basis, was $3,589.7 million, compared with $3,360.2 million for the first six months of 2002, which represented a $229.5 million (6.8 percent) increase from a year ago. Average earning assets in the second quarter and first six months of 2003 increased $13.2 billion (9.0 percent) and $12.5 billion (8.5 percent), respectively, over the comparable periods of 2002. The increase in net interest income for the second quarter and first six months of 2003 was driven by an increase in average earning assets, growth in net free funds and favorable changes in the Companys funding mix. This
Provision for Credit LossesThe provision for credit losses was $323.0 million and $335.0 million for the second quarter of 2003 and 2002, respectively, a decrease of $12.0 million (3.6 percent). For the first six months of 2003 and 2002, the provision for credit losses was $658.0 million and $670.0 million, respectively, a decrease of $12.0 million (1.8 percent). Refer to the Corporate Risk Profile section for further information on the provision for credit losses, net charge-offs, nonperforming assets and other factors considered by the Company in assessing the credit quality of the loan portfolio and establishing the allowance for credit losses.
Noninterest IncomeNoninterest income during the second quarter of 2003 was $1,666.0 million, an increase of $222.2 million (15.4 percent) from the second quarter of 2002. Noninterest income for the first six months of 2003 was $3,188.9 million, compared with $2,776.8 million for the first six months of 2002, which represented an increase of $412.1 million (14.8 percent). Included in noninterest income during the second quarter and first six months of 2003 were net securities gains of $213.1 million and $353.8 million, respectively, compared with net securities gains of $30.6 million and $74.7 million, respectively for the second quarter and first six months of 2002. During a declining rate environment, the Company utilizes securities gains generated by its
Noninterest ExpenseSecond quarter of 2003 noninterest expense was $1,696.5 million, an increase of $169.6 million (11.1 percent) from the second quarter of 2002. For the first six months of 2003, noninterest expense was $3,270.6 million, an increase of $300.8 million (10.1 percent) from the first six months
Pension PlansBecause of the long-term nature of pension plan operations and liabilities, the accounting for pensions is complex and can be impacted by several factors, including accounting methods, investment and funding policies and the plans actuarial assumptions. The Companys pension accounting policies comply with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 87, Employers Accounting for Pension Plans (SFAS 87), and reflect the long-term nature of benefit obligations and the investment horizon of plan assets. The Company has an established process for evaluating the plans, their performance and significant plan assumptions, including the assumed discount rate and the long-term rate of return (LTROR). At least annually, an independent consultant is engaged to assist U.S. Bancorps Compensation Committee in evaluating plan objectives, investment policies considering its long-term investment time horizon and asset allocation strategies, funding policies and significant plan assumptions. Refer to the Companys 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K for a detailed discussion relating to the Companys pension plan policies.
Merger and Restructuring-Related ItemsNoninterest expense in the second quarter and first six months of 2003 included merger and restructuring-related items of $10.8 million and $28.4 million, respectively, compared with $71.6 million and $145.8 million, respectively, for the same periods of 2002. For the second quarter and first six months of 2003, total merger and restructuring-related items primarily represented system conversions associated with the acquisitions of NOVA, Bay View Bank branches and State Street Corporate Trust. For the second quarter of 2002, merger and restructuring-related items included $60.5 million of charges associated with the Firstar/ USBM merger and $11.1 million associated with the integration of NOVA and other smaller acquisitions. For the first six months of 2002, merger and restructuring-related items included $124.9 million of charges associated with the Firstar/ USBM merger and $20.9 million associated with NOVA and other smaller acquisitions.
Income Tax ExpenseThe provision for income taxes was $491.2 million (an effective rate of 34.0 percent) for the second quarter of 2003 and $969.3 million (an effective rate of 34.2 percent) for the first six months of 2003, compared with $439.6 million (an effective rate of 34.8 percent) and $862.8 million (an effective rate of 34.8 percent) for the same periods of 2002. The improvement in the effective tax rate primarily reflected a change in unitary state tax apportionment factors driven by a shift in business mix as a result of the impact of acquisitions, market demographics and the mix of product revenue.
BALANCE SHEET ANALYSIS
Loans The Companys total loan portfolio was $119.4 billion at June 30, 2003, compared with $116.3 billion at December 31, 2002, an increase of $3.1 billion (2.7 percent). The increase in total loans was driven by growth in residential mortgages and automobile loans. Commercial loans, including lease financing, totaled $42.2 billion at June 30, 2003, compared with $41.9 billion at December 31, 2002, an increase of $294 million (.7 percent). The Companys portfolio of commercial real estate loans, which includes commercial mortgages and construction loans, was $27.3 billion at June 30, 2003, compared with $26.9 billion at December 31, 2002, an increase of $392 million (1.5 percent).
Loans Held for SaleAt June 30, 2003, loans held for sale, consisting of residential mortgages to be sold in the secondary markets, were $3.8 billion, compared with $4.2 billion at December 31, 2002. The $.4 billion (8.8 percent) decrease, despite strong mortgage banking activities, was the result of the timing of loan originations and sales in the first six months of 2003.
Investment SecuritiesAt June 30, 2003, investment securities, both available-for-sale and held-to-maturity, totaled $35.6 billion, compared with $28.5 billion at December 31, 2002. The $7.1 billion (24.9 percent) increase reflected the reinvestment of average deposit growth, partially offset by the sale of $11.9 billion of fixed-rate securities during the first six months of 2003. At June 30, 2003, approximately 16.0 percent of the investment securities portfolio represented adjustable-rate financial instruments, compared with 18.6 percent as of December 31, 2002.
Deposits Total deposits were $126.3 billion at June 30, 2003, compared with $115.5 billion at December 31, 2002, an increase of $10.8 billion (9.3 percent). The increase in total deposits was primarily the result of an increase in noninterest-bearing deposits and money market deposits, partially offset by a decline in time deposits greater than $100,000 and time certificates of deposit less than $100,000. Noninterest-bearing deposits were $44.5 billion at June 30, 2003, compared with $35.1 billion at December 31, 2002, an increase of $9.4 billion (26.7 percent), primarily due to the timing of seasonal corporate trust and government deposits. Due to the short duration of these deposits, the impact on the average balance of noninterest-bearing deposits in the second quarter of 2003 was not material and is not expected to significantly increase average deposits in the third quarter of 2003. These short-term deposits also contributed to the increase in total assets as the funds were invested in short-term money market investments.
Borrowings The Company utilizes both short-term and long-term borrowings to fund growth of earning assets in excess of deposit growth. Short-term borrowings, which include federal funds purchased, securities sold under agreements to repurchase and other short-term borrowings, were $7.4 billion at June 30, 2003, compared with $7.8 billion at December 31, 2002. Short-term funding is managed to levels deemed appropriate given alternative funding sources. The decrease of $.4 billion (5.4 percent) in short-term borrowings reflected the impact of funding earning assets through growth in deposits and a shift toward longer-term funding sources. Long-term debt was $31.4 billion at June 30, 2003, compared with $28.6 billion at December 31, 2002. The $2.8 billion (9.8 percent) increase in long-term debt was driven by the issuance of $7.4 billion of medium- and long-term notes and bank notes during the first six months of 2003. The issuance of long-term debt was partially offset by maturities of $4.8 billion during the first six months of 2003. Refer to the Liquidity Risk Management section for discussion of liquidity management of the Company.
CORPORATE RISK PROFILE
Overview Managing risks is an essential part of successfully operating a financial services company. The most prominent risk exposures are credit, residual, operational, interest rate, market and liquidity. Credit risk is the risk of not collecting the interest and/or the principal balance of a loan or investment when it is due. Residual risk is the potential reduction in the end-of-term value of leased assets or the residual cash flows related to asset securitization and other off-balance sheet structures. Operational risk includes risks related to fraud, legal and compliance risk, processing errors, technology and breaches of internal controls. Interest rate risk is the potential reduction of net interest income as a result of changes in interest rates. Rate movements can affect the repricing of assets and liabilities differently, as well as their market value. Market risk arises from fluctuations in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and equity prices that may result in changes in the values of financial instruments, such as trading and available-for-sale securities that are accounted for on a mark-to-market basis. Liquidity risk is the possible inability to fund obligations to depositors, investors or borrowers. In addition, corporate strategic decisions, as well as the risks described above, could give rise to reputation risk. Reputation risk is the risk that negative publicity or press, whether true or not, could result in costly litigation or cause a decline in the Companys stock value, customer base or revenue.
Credit Risk ManagementThe Companys strategy for credit risk management includes well-defined, centralized credit policies, uniform underwriting criteria, and ongoing risk monitoring and review processes for all commercial and consumer credit exposures. The strategy also emphasizes diversification on a geographic, industry and customer level, regular credit examinations and management reviews of loans experiencing deterioration of credit quality. The Company strives to identify potential problem loans early, take any necessary charge-offs promptly and maintain adequate reserve levels for probable loan losses inherent in the portfolio. Commercial banking operations rely on a strong credit culture that combines prudent credit policies and individual lender accountability. The Company utilizes a credit risk rating system to measure the credit quality of individual commercial loan transactions and regularly forecasts potential changes in risk ratings and nonperforming status. In the Companys retail banking operations, standard credit scoring systems are used to assess consumer credit risks and to price consumer products accordingly. The Company also engages in non-lending activities that may give rise to credit risk, including interest rate swap contracts for balance sheet hedging purposes, foreign exchange transactions and interest rate swap contracts for customers, settlement risk and the processing of credit card transactions for merchants. These activities are also subject to credit review, analysis and approval processes.
Analysis of Net Loan Charge-offs Total loan net charge-offs were $322.9 million and $656.7 million during the second quarter and first six months of 2003, respectively, compared with net charge-offs of $330.5 million and $665.5 million, respectively, for the same periods of 2002. The ratio of total loan net charge-offs to average loans in the second quarter and first six months of 2003 was 1.10 percent and 1.13 percent, respectively, compared with 1.16 percent and 1.18 percent, respectively, for the same periods of 2002. Management believes the overall credit quality of the loan portfolio has improved as a result of actions taken by the Company; however, net charge-offs may be volatile during the second half of 2003.
Analysis of Nonperforming Assets Nonperforming assets include nonaccrual loans, restructured loans not performing in accordance with modified terms and other real estate and other nonperforming assets owned by the Company. Interest payments on nonperforming assets are typically applied against the principal balance and not recorded as income. At June 30, 2003, total nonperforming assets were $1,359.7 million, compared with $1,373.5 million at December 31, 2002. The ratio of total nonperforming assets to total loans and other real estate decreased to 1.14 percent at June 30, 2003, compared with 1.18 percent at December 31, 2002. While nonperforming assets levels have declined, the relative level of nonperforming assets reflects the general impact of soft economic conditions during the past two years, specific weakness in the communications, transportation and manufacturing sectors, and the more pronounced affect of the economy on highly leveraged enterprise value refinancings. The Company expects nonperforming assets to remain relatively stable given current market conditions.
Delinquent Loan Ratios
Analysis and Determination of the Allowance for Credit Losses The allowance for credit losses provides coverage for probable and estimable losses inherent in the Companys loan and lease portfolio. Management evaluates the allowance each quarter to determine that it is adequate to cover inherent losses. The evaluation of
Residual Risk ManagementThe Company manages its risk to changes in the value of lease residual assets through disciplined residual setting and valuation at the inception of a lease, diversification of its leased assets, regular asset valuation reviews and monitoring of residual value gains or losses upon the disposition of assets. Commercial lease originations are subject to the same well-defined underwriting standards referred to in the Credit Risk Management section which includes an evaluation of the residual risk. Retail lease residual risk is mitigated further by originating longer-term vehicle leases and effective end-of-term marketing of off-lease vehicles. Also, to reduce the financial risk of potential changes in vehicle residual values, the Company maintains residual value insurance. The catastrophic insurance maintained by the Company provides for the potential recovery of losses on individual vehicle sales in an amount equal to the difference between: (a) 105 percent or 110 percent of the average wholesale auction price for the vehicle at the time of sale and (b) the vehicle residual value specified by the Automotive Lease Guide (an authoritative industry source) at the inception of the lease. The potential recovery is calculated for each individual vehicle sold in a particular policy year and is reduced by any gains realized on vehicles sold during the same period. The Company will receive claim proceeds if, in the aggregate, there is a net loss for such period. To reduce the risk associated with collecting insurance claims, the Company monitors the financial viability of the insurance carrier based on insurance industry ratings and available financial information.
Operational Risk ManagementOperational risk represents the risk of loss resulting from the Companys operations, including, but not limited to, the risk of fraud by employees or persons outside the Company, the execution of unauthorized transactions by employees, errors relating to transaction processing and technology, breaches of the internal control system and compliance requirements and business continuation and disaster recovery. This risk of loss also includes the potential legal actions that could arise as a result of an operational deficiency or as a result of noncompliance with applicable regulatory standards, adverse business decisions or their implementation, and customer attrition due to potential negative publicity.
Interest Rate Risk ManagementIn the banking industry, a significant risk exists related to changes in interest rates. To minimize the volatility of net interest income and of the market value of assets and liabilities, the Company manages its exposure to changes in interest rates through asset and liability management activities within guidelines established by its Asset Liability Policy Committee (ALPC) and approved by the Board of Directors. ALPC has the responsibility for approving and ensuring compliance with ALPC management policies, including interest rate risk exposure. The Company uses Net Interest Income Simulation Analysis and Market Value of Equity Modeling for measuring and analyzing consolidated interest rate risk.
Net Interest Income Simulation Analysis One of the primary tools used to measure interest rate risk and the effect of interest rate changes on rate sensitive income and net interest income is simulation analysis. The monthly analysis incorporates substantially all of the Companys assets and liabilities and off-balance sheet instruments, together with forecasted changes in the balance sheet and assumptions that reflect the current interest rate environment. Through these simulations, management estimates the impact on interest rate sensitive income of a 300 basis point upward or downward gradual change of market interest rates over a one-year period. The simulations also estimate the effect of immediate and sustained parallel shifts in the yield curve of 50 basis points as well as the effect of immediate and sustained flattening or steepening of the yield curve. These simulations include assumptions about how the balance sheet is likely to be affected by changes in loan and deposit growth. Assumptions are made to project interest rates for new loans and deposits based on historical analysis, managements outlook and repricing strategies. These assumptions are validated on a periodic basis. A sensitivity analysis is provided for key variables of the simulation. The results are reviewed by ALPC monthly and are used to guide hedging strategies. ALPC policy guidelines limit the estimated change in interest rate sensitive income to 5.0 percent of forecasted interest rate sensitive income over the succeeding 12 months.
Market Value of Equity Modeling The Company also utilizes the market value of equity as a measurement tool in managing interest rate sensitivity. The market value of equity measures the degree to which the market values of the Companys assets and liabilities and off-balance sheet instruments will change given a change in interest rates. ALPC guidelines limit the change in market value of equity in a 200 basis point parallel rate shock to 15 percent of the base case. Given the low level of current interest rates, the down 200 basis point scenario cannot be computed. The up 200 basis point scenario was a 3.9 percent decrease at June 30, 2003, compared with a 2.5 percent decrease at December 31, 2002. ALPC reviews other down rate scenarios to evaluate the impact of falling interest rates. The down 100 basis point scenario was a .7 percent decrease at June 30, 2003, and a 1.0 percent decrease at December 31, 2002. The overall sensitivity was relatively neutral.
Use of Derivatives to Manage Interest Rate Risk In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into derivative transactions to manage its interest rate and prepayment risk (asset and liability management positions) and to accommodate the business requirements of its customers (customer-related positions). To manage its interest rate risk, the Company may enter into interest rate swap agreements and interest rate options such as caps and floors. Interest rate swaps involve the exchange of fixed-rate and variable-rate payments without the exchange of the underlying notional amount on which the interest payments are calculated. Interest rate caps protect against rising interest rates while interest rate floors protect against declining interest rates. In connection with its mortgage banking operations, the Company enters into forward commitments to sell mortgage loans related to fixed-rate mortgage loans held for sale and fixed-rate mortgage loan commitments. The Company also acts as a seller and buyer of interest rate contracts and foreign exchange rate contracts on behalf of customers. The Company minimizes its market and liquidity risks by taking substantively similar offsetting positions.
Market Risk ManagementIn addition to interest rate risk, the Company is exposed to other forms of market risk as a consequence of conducting normal trading activities. Business activities that contribute to market risk include, among other things, market making, underwriting, proprietary trading and foreign exchange
Liquidity Risk ManagementALPC establishes policies, as well as analyzes and manages liquidity, to ensure that adequate funds are available to meet normal operating requirements in addition to unexpected customer demands for funds, such as high levels of deposit withdrawals or loan demand, in a timely and cost-effective manner. The most important factor in the preservation of liquidity is maintaining public confidence that facilitates the retention and growth of a large, stable supply of core deposits and wholesale funds. Ultimately, public confidence is generated through profitable operations, sound credit quality and a strong capital position. The Companys performance in these areas has enabled it to develop a large and reliable base of core funding within its market areas and in domestic and global capital markets. Liquidity management is viewed from long-term and short-term perspectives, as well as from an asset and liability perspective. Management monitors liquidity through a regular review of maturity profiles, funding sources, and loan and deposit forecasts to minimize funding risk.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements Asset securitization and conduits represent a source of funding for the Company through off-balance sheet structures. The Company sponsors two off-balance sheet conduits to which it has transferred high-grade assets: a commercial loan conduit and an investment securities conduit. These conduits are funded by issuing commercial paper. The commercial loan conduit holds primarily high credit quality commercial loans and held assets of $1.8 billion at June 30, 2003, and $4.2 billion at December 31, 2002. The investment securities conduit holds high-grade investment securities and held assets of $8.4 billion at June 30, 2003, and $9.5 billion at December 31, 2002. These investment securities include primarily (i) private label asset-backed securities, which are insurance wrapped by AAA/ Aaa-rated mono-line insurance companies and (ii) government agency mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations. The commercial loan conduit had commercial paper liabilities of $1.8 billion at June 30, 2003, and $4.2 billion at December 31, 2002. The investment securities conduit had commercial paper liabilities of $8.4 billion at June 30, 2003, and $9.5 billion at December 31, 2002. The Company benefits by selling commercial loans and investment securities to conduits that provide diversification of funding sources in a capital-efficient manner and generate income.
Capital ManagementThe Company is committed to managing capital for maximum shareholder benefit and maintaining strong protection for depositors and creditors. Total shareholders equity was $19.2 billion at June 30, 2003, compared with $18.1 billion at December 31, 2002. The increase was the result of corporate earnings offset primarily by dividends.
LINE OF BUSINESS FINANCIAL REVIEW
Within the Company, financial performance is measured by major lines of business, which include Wholesale Banking, Consumer Banking, Private Client, Trust and Asset Management, Payment Services, Capital Markets and Treasury and Corporate Support. These operating segments are components of the Company about which financial information is available and is evaluated regularly in deciding how to allocate resources and assess performance. Business line results are derived from the Companys business unit profitability reporting systems. Designations, assignments and allocations may change from time to time as management systems are enhanced, methods of evaluating performance or product lines change or business segments are realigned to better respond to our diverse customer base. During 2003, certain organization and methodology changes were made and, accordingly, 2002 results were restated and presented on a comparable basis. The provision for credit losses within the Wholesale Banking, Consumer Banking, Private Client, Trust and Asset Management, Payment Services and Capital Markets lines of business is based on net charge-offs while Treasury and Corporate Support reflects the residual component of the Companys total consolidated provision for credit losses, determined in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
Wholesale Bankingoffers lending, depository, treasury management and other financial services to middle market, large corporate and public sector clients. Wholesale Banking contributed $311.2 million of the Companys operating earnings for the second quarter of 2003 and $616.8 million for the first six months of 2003, an 8.0 percent and 7.0 percent increase, respectively, over the same periods of 2002. The increase in operating earnings in the second quarter of 2003 and the first six months of 2003, compared with the same periods of 2002, was driven by higher net revenue and reductions in noninterest expense partially offset by higher provision for credit losses.
Consumer Bankingdelivers products and services to the broad consumer market and small businesses through banking offices, telemarketing, on-line services, direct mail and automated teller machines (ATMs). It encompasses community banking, metropolitan banking, small business banking, consumer lending, mortgage banking, workplace banking, student banking, 24-hour banking and investment product and insurance sales. Consumer Banking contributed $400.5 million of the Companys operating earnings for the second quarter of 2003 and $787.4 million for the first six months of 2003, a 9.6 percent and 12.2 percent increase, respectively, over the same periods of 2002.
Private Client, Trust and Asset Managementprovides mutual fund processing services, trust, private banking and financial advisory services through four businesses, including: the Private Client Group, Corporate Trust, Institutional Trust and Custody and Fund Services, LLC. The business segment also offers investment management services to several client segments, including mutual funds, institutional customers and private asset management. Private Client, Trust and Asset Management contributed $126.4 million of the Companys operating earnings for the second quarter of 2003 and $241.7 million for the first six months of 2003, increases of 6.8 percent and 4.3 percent, respectively, over the same periods of 2002.
Payment Servicesincludes consumer and business credit cards, corporate and purchasing card services, consumer lines of credit, ATM processing, merchant processing and debit cards. Payment Services contributed $181.1 million of the Companys operating earnings for the second quarter of 2003 and $350.2 million for the first six months of 2003, a 14.3 percent and 17.4 percent increase, respectively, over the same periods of 2002.
Capital Marketsengages in equity and fixed income trading activities, offers investment banking and underwriting services for corporate and public sector customers and provides financial advisory services and securities, mutual funds, annuities and insurance products to consumers and regionally based businesses through a network of brokerage offices. Capital Markets contributed $10.0 million of the Companys operating earnings for the second quarter of 2003 and $15.9 million for the first six months of 2003, a 49.3 percent increase and a 12.6 percent decrease, respectively, compared with the same periods of 2002.
Treasury and Corporate Supportincludes the Companys investment portfolios, funding, capital management and asset securitization activities, interest rate risk management, the net effect of transfer pricing related to average balances and business activities managed on a corporate basis, including enterprise-wide operations and administrative support functions. Treasury and Corporate Support recorded an operating loss of $68.4 million for the second quarter of 2003 and $128.5 million for the first six months of 2003, decreases of 1.6 percent and 11.6 percent, respectively, compared with the same periods of 2002.
ACCOUNTING CHANGES
Note 2 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements discusses new accounting policies adopted by the Company during 2003 and 2002 and the expected impact of accounting policies recently issued or proposed but not yet required to be adopted. To the extent the adoption of new accounting standards affects the Companys financial condition, results of operations or liquidity, the impacts are discussed in the applicable section(s) of Managements Discussion and Analysis and the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The accounting and reporting policies of the Company comply with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and conform to general practices within the banking industry. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions. The financial position and results of operations can be affected by these estimates and assumptions, which are integral to understanding reported results. Critical accounting policies are those policies that management believes are the most important to the portrayal of the Companys financial condition and results, and require management to make estimates that are difficult, subjective or complex. Most accounting policies are not considered by management to be critical accounting policies. Several factors are considered in determining whether or not a policy is critical in the preparation of financial statements. These factors include, among other things, whether the estimates are significant to the financial statements, the nature of the estimates, the ability to readily validate the estimates with other information including third-parties or available prices, and sensitivity of the estimates to changes in economic conditions and whether alternative accounting methods may be utilized under generally accepted accounting principles. Management has discussed the development and the selection of critical accounting policies with the Companys Audit Committee.
Allowance for Credit LossesThe allowance for credit losses is established to provide for probable losses inherent in the Companys credit portfolio. The methods utilized to estimate the allowance for credit losses, key assumptions and quantitative and qualitative information considered by management in determining the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses are discussed in the Credit Risk Management section.
Asset Impairment In the ordinary course of business, the Company evaluates the carrying value of its assets for potential impairment. Generally, potential impairment is determined based on a comparison of fair value to the carrying value. The determination of fair value can be highly subjective, especially for assets that are not actively traded or when market-based prices are not available. The Company estimates fair value based on the present value of estimated future cash flows. The initial valuation and subsequent impairment tests may require the use of significant management estimates. Additionally, determining the amount, if any, of an impairment may require an assessment of whether or not a decline in an assets estimated fair value below the recorded value is temporary in nature. While impairment assessments impact most asset categories, the following areas are considered to be critical accounting matters in relation to the financial statements.
Mortgage Servicing Rights Mortgage servicing rights (MSRs) are capitalized as separate assets when loans are sold and servicing is retained. The total cost of loans sold is allocated between the loans sold and the servicing assets retained based on their relative fair values. MSRs that are purchased from others are initially recorded at cost. The carrying value of the MSRs is amortized in proportion to and over the period of estimated net servicing revenue and recorded in noninterest expense as amortization of intangible assets. The carrying value of these assets is periodically reviewed for impairment using a lower of carrying value or fair value methodology. For purposes of measuring impairment, the servicing rights are stratified based on the underlying loan type and note rate and the carrying value for each stratum is compared to fair value based on a discounted cash flow analysis, utilizing current prepayment speeds and discount rates. Events that may significantly affect the estimates used are changes in interest rates and the related impact on mortgage loan prepayment speeds and the payment performance of the underlying loans. If the fair value is less than the carrying value, impairment is recognized through a valuation allowance for each impaired stratum and recorded as amortization of intangible assets. The reduction in the fair value of MSRs at June 30, 2003, to immediate 25 and 50 basis point adverse changes in interest rates would be approximately $37 million and $68 million, respectively. An upward movement in interest rates at June 30, 2003, of 25 and 50 basis points would increase the fair value of the MSRs by approximately $66 million and $139 million, respectively. Refer to Note 6 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding MSRs.
Goodwill and Other Intangibles The Company records all assets and liabilities acquired in purchase acquisitions, including goodwill and other intangibles, at fair value as required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141 (SFAS 141), Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. Goodwill and indefinite-lived assets are no longer amortized but are subject, at a minimum, to annual tests for impairment. Under certain situations, interim impairment tests may be required if events occur or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting segment below its carrying amount. Other intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives using straight-line and accelerated methods and are subject to impairment if events or circumstances indicate a possible inability to realize the carrying amount.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Under the supervision and with the participation of the Companys management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, the Company has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 15(d)-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act)). Based upon this evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were effective in making them aware on a timely basis of the material information relating to the Company required to be included in the Companys periodic filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements" -->
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and, therefore, do not include all information and notes necessary for a complete presentation of financial position, results of operations and cash flow activity required in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. In the opinion of management of U.S. Bancorp (the Company), all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair statement of results for the interim periods have been made, and the Company believes such presentation is adequate to make the information presented not misleading. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and notes included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002. Certain amounts in prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation.
Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and EquityIn May 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 150 (SFAS 150), Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity, which establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. SFAS 150 is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise is effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003, except for mandatorily redeemable financial instruments of nonpublic entities. The Company does not believe that the adoption of SFAS 150 will have a material impact on the Companys financial statements.
Derivative Instruments and Hedging ActivitiesIn April 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 149 (SFAS 149), Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, (SFAS 133) which amends and clarifies accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts and for hedging activities under SFAS No. 133. In particular, SFAS 149 clarifies under what circumstances a contract with an initial net investment meets the characteristic of a derivative and clarifies when a derivative contains a financing component. SFAS 149 is generally effective for contracts entered into or modified after June 30, 2003. The Company does not believe that the adoption of SFAS 149 will have a material impact on the Companys financial statements.
Consolidation of Variable Interest EntitiesIn January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Interpretation No. 46 (FIN 46), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (VIEs), an interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, Consolidated Financial Statements, to improve financial reporting of special purpose and other entities. In accordance with FIN 46, business enterprises that represent the primary beneficiary of another entity by retaining a controlling financial interest in that entitys assets, liabilities and results of operating activities must consolidate the entity in its financial statements. Prior to the issuance of FIN 46, consolidation generally occurred when an enterprise controlled another entity through voting interests. Certain VIEs that are qualifying special purpose entities (QSPEs) subject to the reporting requirements of Statement of Accounting Standards No. 140 (SFAS 140), Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishment of Liabilities, will not be required to be consolidated under the provisions of FIN 46. The consolidation provisions of FIN 46 apply to VIEs created or entered into after January 31, 2003, and for pre-existing VIEs, in the first reporting period beginning after June 15, 2003. If applicable, transition rules allow the restatement of financial statements or prospective application with a cumulative effect adjustment. In addition, FIN 46 expands the
Stock-Based CompensationIn December 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 148 (SFAS 148), Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure, an amendment of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (SFAS 123), Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. SFAS 148 provides alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. In addition, SFAS 148 requires prominent disclosures in interim as well as annual financial statements about the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method used on reported net income. SFAS 148 is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2002. The Company plans to continue to account for stock-based employee compensation under the intrinsic based method and to provide disclosure of the impact of the fair value based method on reported income. Employee stock options have characteristics that are significantly different from those of traded options, including vesting provisions and trading limitations that impact their liquidity. Therefore, the existing option pricing models do not necessarily provide a reliable measure of the fair value of employee stock options. Refer to Note 11 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for proforma disclosure of the impact of stock options utilizing the Black-Scholes valuation method.
Guarantees In November 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Interpretation No. 45 (FIN 45), Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others, to clarify accounting and disclosure requirements relating to a guarantors issuance of certain types of guarantees. FIN 45 requires entities to disclose additional information about certain guarantees, or group of similar guarantees, even if the likelihood of the guarantors having to make any payments under the guarantee is remote. The disclosure provisions are effective for interim and annual financial statements for the first reporting period ending after December 15, 2002. For certain guarantees, the interpretation also requires that guarantors recognize a liability equal to the fair value of the guarantee upon its issuance. The Company adopted the initial recognition and measurement provision effective January 1, 2003, which did not have a material impact on the Companys financial statements. Refer to Note 12 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on guarantees.
Business Combinations and Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141 (SFAS 141), Business Combinations, and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142 (SFAS 142), Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. SFAS 141 mandates that the purchase method of accounting be used for all business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001, and established specific criteria for the recognition of intangible assets separately from goodwill. SFAS 142 addresses the accounting for goodwill and intangible assets subsequent to their acquisition. The Company adopted SFAS 142 on January 1, 2002. The most significant changes made by SFAS 142 are that goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets are no longer amortized and are to be tested for impairment at least annually. The amortization provisions of SFAS 142 apply to goodwill and intangible assets acquired after June 30, 2001. With respect to goodwill and intangible assets acquired prior to July 1, 2001, the amortization provisions of SFAS 142 were effective upon adoption of SFAS 142.
On April 1, 2002, the Company acquired Cleveland-based The Leader Mortgage Company, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of First Defiance Corp., in a cash transaction. The transaction represented total assets acquired of $531 million and total liabilities assumed of $446 million. Included in total assets were mortgage servicing rights and other intangibles of $173 million and goodwill of $18 million. Leader specializes in acquiring servicing of loans originated for state and local housing authorities.
The following table summarizes acquisitions by the Company completed since January 1, 2002:
The Company recorded pre-tax merger and restructuring-related items of $28.4 million in the first six months of 2003. In 2003, merger and restructuring-related items were primarily incurred in connection with the July 2001 acquisition of NOVA and with the acquisitions of State Street Corporate Trust and Bay View Bank. Refer to Note 3 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding business combinations.
The components of merger and restructuring-related items are shown below:
The following table presents a summary of activity with respect to merger and restructuring-related accruals:
The components of merger and restructuring-related accruals for all acquisitions were as follows:
Merger and restructuring-related accruals by significant acquisition were as follows:
The composition of the loan portfolio was as follows:
The Companys portfolio of residential mortgages serviced for others was $48.2 billion and $43.1 billion at June 30, 2003, and December 31, 2002, respectively.
The net carrying value of capitalized mortgage servicing rights was as follows:
Changes in capitalized mortgage servicing rights are summarized as follows:
The key economic assumptions used to estimate the value of the mortgage servicing rights portfolio were as follows:
The estimated sensitivity of the fair value of the mortgage servicing rights portfolio to changes in interest rates at June 30, 2003, was as follows:
The following table reflects the changes in the carrying value of goodwill for the six months ended June 30, 2003:
Amortizable intangible assets consisted of the following:
Aggregate amortization expense consisted of the following:
Below is the estimated amortization expense for the years ending:
The following table is a summary of the Trust Preferred Securities as of June 30, 2003:
At June 30, 2003, and December 31, 2002, the Company had authority to issue 4 billion shares of common stock and 10 million shares of preferred stock. The Company had 1,924.5 million and 1,917.0 million shares of common stock outstanding at June 30, 2003, and December 31, 2002, respectively.
The components of earnings per share were:
The following table shows proforma compensation expense, net income and earnings per share adjusted as if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123.
Guarantees and contingent liabilities of the Company as of June 30, 2003, include:
LETTERS OF CREDIT
Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments the Company issues to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third-party. The guarantees frequently support public and private borrowing arrangements, including commercial paper issuances, bond financings and other similar transactions. The Company issues commercial letters of credit on behalf of customers to ensure payment or collection in connection with trade transactions. In the event of a customers nonperformance, the Companys credit loss exposure is the same as in any extension of credit, up to the letters contractual amount. Management assesses the borrowers credit to determine the necessary collateral, which may include marketable securities, real estate, accounts receivable and inventory. Since the conditions requiring the Company to fund letters of credit may not occur, the Company expects its liquidity requirements to be less than the total outstanding commitments. The maximum potential future payments guaranteed by the Company under standby letter of credit arrangements at June 30, 2003, was approximately $9.6 billion with a weighted-average term of approximately 24 months. The estimated fair value of the liability for standby letters of credit was approximately $85.2 million at June 30, 2003.
GUARANTEES
Guarantees are contingent commitments issued by the Company to customers or other third-parties. The Companys guarantees primarily include parent guarantees related to subsidiaries third-party borrowing arrangements; third-party performance guarantees inherent in the Companys business operations such as indemnified securities lending programs and merchant charge-backs guarantees; indemnification or buy-back provisions related to certain asset sales; synthetic lease guarantees; and contingent consideration arrangements related to acquisitions. For certain guarantees, the Company has recorded a liability related to the potential obligation, or has access to collateral to support the guarantee or through the exercise of other recourse provisions can offset some or all of the maximum potential future payments made under these guarantees. The estimated fair value of guarantees, other than standby letters of credit, was approximately $131 million at June 30, 2003.
Third-Party Borrowing ArrangementsThe Company provides guarantees to third-parties as a part of certain subsidiaries borrowing arrangements, primarily representing guaranteed operating or capital lease payments or other debt obligations with maturity dates extending through 2014. The maximum potential future payments guaranteed by the Company under these arrangements was approximately $1.5 billion at June 30, 2003. The Companys
Commitments from Securities LendingThe Company participates in securities lending activities by acting as the customers agent involving the loan or sale of securities. The Company indemnifies customers for the difference between the market value of the securities lent and the market value of the collateral received. Cash collateralizes these transactions. The maximum potential future payments guaranteed by the Company under these arrangements was approximately $12.5 billion at June 30, 2003, and represented the market value of the securities lent to third-parties. At June 30, 2003, the Company held assets with a market value of $12.9 billion as collateral for these arrangements.
Asset Sales The Company has provided guarantees to certain third-parties in connection with the sale of certain assets, primarily loan portfolios and low-income housing tax credits. These guarantees are generally in the form of asset buy-back or make-whole provisions that are triggered upon a credit event or a change in the tax-qualifying status of the related projects, as applicable, and remain in effect until the loans are collected or final tax credits are realized, respectively. The maximum potential future payments guaranteed by the Company under these arrangements was approximately $918.1 million at June 30, 2003, and represented the total proceeds received from the buyer in these transactions where the buy-back or make-whole provisions have not yet expired. Recourse available to the Company includes guarantees from the Small Business Administration (for SBA loans sold), recourse to the correspondent that originated the loan or to the private mortgage issuer, the right to collect payments from the debtors, and/or the right to liquidate the underlying collateral, if any, and retain the proceeds. Based on its established loan-to-value guidelines, the Company believes the recourse available is sufficient to recover future payments, if any, under the loan buy-back guarantees.
Merchant ProcessingThe Company, through its subsidiary NOVA Information Systems, Inc., provides merchant processing services. Under the rules of credit card associations, a merchant processor retains a contingent liability for credit card transactions processed. This contingent liability arises in the event of a billing dispute between the merchant and a cardholder that is ultimately resolved in the cardholders favor. In this situation, the transaction is charged back to the merchant and the disputed amount is credited or otherwise refunded to the cardholder. If the Company is unable to collect this amount from the merchant, it bears the loss for the amount of the refund paid to the cardholder.
Contingent Consideration ArrangementsThe Company has contingent payment obligations related to certain business combination transactions. Payments are guaranteed as long as certain post-acquisition performance-based criteria are met. At June 30, 2003, the maximum potential future payments guaranteed by the Company under these arrangements was approximately $76.2 million and primarily represented contingent payments related to the acquisition of State Street Corporate Trust business on December 31, 2002, and are payable within 6 to 12 months.
Other Guarantees The Company provides liquidity and credit enhancement facilities to two Company-sponsored conduits, as more fully described in the Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements section within Managements Discussion and Analysis. Although management believes a draw against these facilities is remote, the maximum potential future payments guaranteed by the Company under these arrangements was approximately $10.2 billion at June 30, 2003. The recorded fair value of the Companys liability for the credit enhancement recourse obligation and liquidity facilities was $37.4 million at June 30, 2003, and was included in other liabilities.
OTHER CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
In connection with the industry-wide investigations of research analyst independence issues, the Companys brokerage and investment banking business line established a $50.0 million liability for probable claims that in part included a settlement with certain governmental and regulatory agencies of $25.0 million for investment banking regulatory matters and $7.5 million for funding independent analyst research for its customers.
Consolidated Statement of Cash FlowsListed below are supplemental disclosures to the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows:
Money Market Investmentsare included with cash and due from banks as part of cash and cash equivalents. Money market investments consisted of the following:
Part II -- Other Information" -->
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) Exhibits
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
SIGNATURE
EXHIBIT 12
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
I, Jerry A. Grundhofer, Chief Executive Officer of U.S. Bancorp, a Delaware corporation, certify that:
Dated: August 14, 2003
EXHIBIT 31.2
I, David M. Moffett, Chief Financial Officer of U.S. Bancorp, a Delaware corporation, certify that:
EXHIBIT 32.1
Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. section 1350), the undersigned, Chief Executive Officer of U.S. Bancorp, a Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby certify that:
The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. section 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.
A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has been provided to U.S. Bancorp and will be retained by U.S. Bancorp and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.2
Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. section 1350), the undersigned, Chief Financial Officer of U.S. Bancorp, a Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby certify that:
Executive Offices
U.S. Bancorp
Common Stock Transfer Agent and Registrar
Mellon Investor Services
For Registered or Certified Mail:
Telephone representatives are available weekdays from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Central Time, and automated support is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Specific information about your account is available on Mellons Internet site by clicking on the Investor ServicesDirectSM link.
Independent Auditors
Common Stock Listing and Trading
Dividends and Reinvestment Plan
Investment Community Contacts
Judith T. Murphy
Financial Information
Web site. For information about U.S. Bancorp, including news, financial results, annual reports and other documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, access our home page on the Internet at usbank.com and click on Investor/ Shareholder Information.
Mail. At your request, we will mail to you our quarterly earnings news releases, quarterly financial data reported on Form 10-Q and additional copies of our annual reports. Please contact:
U.S. Bancorp Investor Relations
Media Requests
Privacy
U.S. Bancorp is committed to respecting the privacy of our customers and safeguarding the financial and personal information provided to us. To learn more about the U.S. Bancorp commitment to protecting privacy, visit usbank.com and click on Privacy Pledge.
Code of Ethics
U.S. Bancorp places the highest importance on honesty and integrity. Each year, every U.S. Bancorp employee certifies compliance with the letter and spirit of our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct, the guiding ethical standards of our organization. For details about our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct, visit usbank.com and click on About U.S. Bancorp, then Ethics at U.S. Bank.
Diversity
U.S. Bancorp and our subsidiaries are committed to developing and maintaining a workplace that reflects the diversity of the communities we serve. We support a work environment where individual differences are valued and respected and where each individual who shares the fundamental values of the company has an opportunity to contribute and grow based on individual merit.
Equal Employment Opportunity/Affirmative Action
U.S. Bancorp and our subsidiaries are committed to providing Equal Employment Opportunity to all employees and applicants for employment. In keeping with this commitment, employment decisions are made based upon performance, skills and abilities, rather than race, color, religion, national origin or ancestry, gender, age, disability, veteran status, sexual orientation or any other factors protected by law. The corporation complies with municipal, state and federal fair employment laws, including regulations applying to federal contractors.
U.S. Bancorp, including each of our subsidiaries, is an Equal Opportunity Employer committed to creating a diverse workforce.
This report has been produced on recycled paper.