UNITED STATES
x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003
OR
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
For the transition period from (not applicable)
Commission file number 1-6880
U.S. BANCORP
800 Nicollet Mall
612-973-1111
(not applicable)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding twelve months, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
YES X NO
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrants classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of Contents and Form 10-Q Cross Reference Index
Forward-Looking Statements
Managements Discussion and Analysis" -->
OVERVIEW
Earnings SummaryU.S. Bancorp and its subsidiaries (the Company) reported net income of $984.9 million for the third quarter of 2003, or $.51 per diluted share, compared with $860.3 million, or $.45 per diluted share, for the third quarter of 2002. Return on average assets and return on average equity were 2.05 percent and 20.5 percent, respectively, for the third quarter of 2003, compared with returns of 1.97 percent and 19.8 percent, respectively, for the third quarter of 2002. The Companys results for the third quarter of 2003 improved over the third quarter of 2002, primarily due to growth in net interest income and fee-based products and services, as well as controlled operating expense and lower credit costs. Included in the third quarter of 2003 were losses on the sale of securities of $108.9 million, a net reduction of $227.9 million from securities gains (losses) realized in the third quarter of 2002. The third quarter of 2003 also included a $108.5 million reparation of mortgage servicing rights (MSR), a $226.2 million favorable variance over the third quarter of 2002. Higher interest rates in the third quarter of 2003 drove the realization of the MSR reparation and the Companys decision to sell lower yielding securities. Net income for the third quarter of 2003 also included after-tax merger and restructuring-related items of $6.7 million ($10.2 million on a pre-tax basis), compared with after-tax merger and restructuring-related items of $45.9 million ($70.4 million on a pre-tax basis) for the third quarter of 2002. The $60.2 million decline in pre-tax merger and restructuring-related charges was primarily due to the completion of integration activities associated with the merger of Firstar Corporation (Firstar) and the former U.S. Bancorp (USBM) at the end of 2002. Refer to the Merger and Restructuring-Related Items section for further discussion on merger and restructuring-related items.
Acquisition and Divestiture ActivityThe following transactions were accounted for as purchases from the date of completion. On December 31, 2002, the Company acquired the corporate trust business of State Street Bank and Trust Company in a cash transaction. The transaction represented total assets acquired of $682 million and total liabilities assumed of $39 million at the closing date.
Planned Spin-Off of Piper Jaffray CompaniesOn February 19, 2003, the Company announced that its Board of Directors approved a plan to effect a spin-off of its capital markets business unit, including the investment banking and brokerage activities primarily conducted by its wholly-owned subsidiary, U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray Companies Inc. (Piper Jaffray Companies). As of September 30, 2003, Piper Jaffray Companies had assets of $2.6 billion. During the first nine months of 2003, Piper Jaffray Companies generated revenue of $584.9 million (5.9 percent of total consolidated revenue) and contributed $29.3 million of net income, representing 1.0 percent of the Companys consolidated net income.
STATEMENT OF INCOME ANALYSIS
Net Interest IncomeThe third quarter of 2003 net interest income, on a taxable-equivalent basis, was $1,832.6 million, compared with $1,741.1 million for the third quarter of 2002, which represented a $91.5 million (5.3 percent) increase over 2002. Net interest income for the first nine months of 2003, on a taxable-equivalent basis, was $5,422.3 million, compared with $5,101.3 million for the first nine months of 2002, which represented a $321.0 million (6.3 percent) increase from a year ago. Average earning assets in the third quarter and first nine months of 2003 increased $14.8 billion (9.9 percent) and $13.3 billion (9.0 percent), respectively, over the comparable periods of 2002. The increase in net interest income for the third quarter and first nine months of 2003 was driven by an increase in average earning assets, growth in average net free funds and favorable changes in the Companys average funding mix. The increase in average earning assets in the third quarter and first nine months of 2003, compared with the same periods of 2002, was primarily driven by increases in investment securities, residential mortgages, loans held for sale and retail loans, partially offset by a decline in commercial loans. Also contributing to the year-over-year increase in net interest income were recent acquisitions, including The Leader Mortgage Company, LLC, State Street Corporate Trust and Bay View, which accounted for approximately $19.6 million and $63.2 million of the increase in net interest income during the third quarter and first nine months of 2003, respectively. The net interest margin for the third quarter of 2003 was 4.41 percent, compared with 4.61 percent for the third quarter of 2002, while the year-to-date net interest margin decreased from 4.60 percent for the first nine months of 2002 to 4.49 percent for the first nine months of 2003. The year-over-year decline in the net interest margin for the third quarter and the first nine months of 2003 primarily reflected growth in lower-yielding investment securities as a percent of total earning assets, a change in loan mix and a decline in the margin benefit from net free funds due to lower average interest rates. In addition, the net interest margin declined year-over-year as a result of consolidating high credit quality, low margin loans from a commercial loan conduit onto the Companys balance sheet during the third quarter of 2003. The Company expects the net interest margin to remain relatively unchanged in the fourth quarter of 2003.
Provision for Credit LossesThe provision for credit losses was $310.0 million and $330.0 million for the third quarter of 2003 and 2002, respectively, a decrease of $20.0 million (6.1 percent). For the first nine months of 2003 and 2002, the provision for credit losses was $968.0 million and $1,000.0 million, respectively, a decrease of $32.0 million (3.2 percent). The decline from a year ago primarily reflected lower retail losses, the result of collection efforts and an improving credit risk profile. Refer to the Corporate Risk Profile section for further information on the provision for credit losses, net charge-offs, nonperforming assets and other factors considered by the Company in assessing the credit quality of the loan portfolio and establishing the allowance for credit losses.
Noninterest IncomeNoninterest income during the third quarter of 2003 was $1,375.0 million, a decrease of $190.6 million (12.2 percent) from the third quarter of 2002. The reduction in noninterest income from the third quarter of 2002 was driven by a decrease in net gains (losses) on the sale of securities, commercial products revenue and mortgage banking revenue, partially offset by increases in investment banking revenue, cash management fees, payment services revenue and increases in revenue attributable to acquisitions. Noninterest income for the first nine months of 2003 was $4,563.9 million, compared with $4,342.4 million for the first nine months of 2002, which represented an increase of $221.5 million (5.1 percent). The growth in noninterest income in the first nine months of 2003, compared with the same period of 2002, was driven by payment services revenue, cash management fees, mortgage banking revenue, deposit service charges and increases in revenue attributable to acquisitions. Also, contributing to the increase in noninterest income was a net increase in net securities gains (losses) of $51.2 million during 2003 relative to the first nine months of 2002. The favorable impact on noninterest income from acquisitions, which included The Leader Mortgage Company, LLC, Bay View and State Street Corporate Trust, was approximately $27.1 million and $98.4 million for the third quarter and first nine months of 2003, respectively.
Noninterest ExpenseThird quarter of 2003 noninterest expense was $1,397.3 million, a decrease of $250.3 million (15.2 percent) from the third quarter of 2002. For the first nine months of 2003, noninterest expense was $4,667.9 million, an increase of $50.5 million (1.1 percent) from the first nine months of 2002. The year-over-year decline in noninterest expense during the third quarter of 2003 was primarily due to the favorable change in MSR impairment of $226.2 million and a $60.2 million reduction in merger and restructuring-related charges. These positive variances were partially offset by the impact of recent acquisitions, including the Bay View Bank branches and State Street Corporate Trust, and compensation expense, which primarily reflected higher incentive-based compensation related to improving capital markets activity. The year-over-year increase in noninterest expense during the first nine months of 2003 was primarily due to an increase in MSR impairment, incremental pension and retirement expense and recent acquisitions partially offset by lower merger and restructuring-related charges.
Merger and Restructuring-Related ItemsNoninterest expense in the third quarter and first nine months of 2003 included merger and restructuring-related items of $10.2 million and $38.6 million, respectively, compared with $70.4 million and $216.2 million, respectively, for the same periods of 2002. For the third quarter and first nine months of 2003, total merger and restructuring-related items primarily represented system conversions associated with the acquisitions of NOVA, Bay View Bank branches and State Street Corporate Trust. For the third quarter of 2002, merger and restructuring-related items included $58.2 million of charges associated with the Firstar/USBM merger and $12.2 million associated with the integration of NOVA and other smaller acquisitions. For the first nine months of 2002, merger and restructuring-related items included $183.1 million of charges associated with the Firstar/USBM merger and $33.1 million associated with NOVA and other smaller acquisitions.
Income Tax ExpenseThe provision for income taxes was $507.4 million (an effective rate of 34.0 percent) for the third quarter of 2003 and $1,476.7 million (an effective rate of 34.1 percent) for the first nine months of 2003, compared with $459.5 million (an effective rate of 34.8 percent) and $1,322.3 million (an effective rate of 34.8 percent) for the same periods of 2002, respectively. The improvement in the effective tax rate primarily reflected a change in unitary state tax apportionment factors driven by a shift in business mix as a result of the impact of acquisitions, market demographics and the mix of product revenue.
BALANCE SHEET ANALYSIS
Loans The Companys total loan portfolio was $119.9 billion at September 30, 2003, compared with $116.3 billion at December 31, 2002, an increase of $3.6 billion (3.1 percent). The increase in total loans was driven by growth in residential mortgages and other retail loans. Commercial loans, including lease financing, totaled $41.2 billion at September 30, 2003, compared with $41.9 billion at December 31, 2002, a decrease of $774 million (1.8 percent). Although the consolidation of loans from the Stellar commercial loan conduit during the third quarter of 2003 had a positive impact on loan balances year-over-year, current credit markets and soft economic conditions through early 2003 led to the decline in total commercial loans. The Companys portfolio of commercial real estate loans, which includes commercial mortgages and construction loans, was $27.2 billion at September 30, 2003, compared with $26.9 billion at December 31, 2002, an increase of $375 million (1.4 percent).
Loans Held for SaleAt September 30, 2003, loans held for sale, consisting of residential mortgages to be sold in the secondary markets, were $3.6 billion, compared with $4.2 billion at December 31, 2002. The $519 million (12.5 percent) decrease, despite strong mortgage banking activities, was the result of the timing of loan originations and sales in the first nine months of 2003.
Investment SecuritiesAt September 30, 2003, investment securities, both available-for-sale and held-to-maturity, totaled $35.0 billion, compared with $28.5 billion at December 31, 2002. The $6.5 billion (22.9 percent) increase reflected the reinvestment of average deposit growth, partially offset by the sale of $15.1 billion of fixed-rate securities during the first nine months of 2003. At September 30, 2003, approximately 14.5 percent of the investment securities portfolio represented adjustable-rate financial instruments, compared with 18.6 percent as of December 31, 2002.
Deposits Total deposits were $115.0 billion at September 30, 2003, compared with $115.5 billion at December 31, 2002, a decrease of $.5 billion (.4 percent). The decrease in total deposits was primarily the result of declines in noninterest-bearing deposits, time deposits greater than $100,000 and time certificates of deposit less than $100,000, partially offset
Borrowings The Company utilizes both short-term and long-term borrowings to fund growth of earning assets in excess of deposit growth. Short-term borrowings, which include federal funds purchased, securities sold under agreements to repurchase and other short-term borrowings, were $12.9 billion at September 30, 2003, compared with $7.8 billion at December 31, 2002. Short-term funding is managed to levels deemed appropriate given alternative funding sources. The increase of $5.1 billion (64.8 percent) in short-term borrowings reflected the impact of funding earning assets and the decline in government deposits. Long-term debt was $31.6 billion at September 30, 2003, compared with $28.6 billion at December 31, 2002. The $3.0 billion (10.5 percent) increase in long-term debt was driven by the issuance of $8.4 billion of medium- and long-term notes and bank notes during the first nine months of 2003. The issuance of long-term debt was partially offset by maturities of $5.4 billion during the first nine months of 2003. Refer to the Liquidity Risk Management section for discussion of liquidity management of the Company.
CORPORATE RISK PROFILE
Overview Managing risks is an essential part of successfully operating a financial services company. The most prominent risk exposures are credit, residual, operational, interest rate, market and liquidity. Credit risk is the risk of not collecting the interest and/or the principal balance of a loan or investment when it is due. Residual risk is the potential reduction in the end-of-term value of leased assets or the residual cash flows related to asset securitization and other off-balance sheet structures. Operational risk includes risks related to fraud, legal and compliance risk, processing errors, technology, breaches of internal controls and business continuation and disaster recovery risk. Interest rate risk is the potential reduction of net interest income as a result of changes in interest rates. Rate movements can affect the repricing of assets and liabilities differently, as well as their market value. Market risk arises from fluctuations in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and equity prices that may result in changes in the values of financial instruments, such as trading and available-for-sale securities that are accounted for on a mark-to-market basis. Liquidity risk is the possible inability to fund obligations to depositors, investors or borrowers. In addition, corporate strategic decisions, as well as the risks described above, could give rise to reputation risk. Reputation risk is the risk that negative publicity or press, whether true or not, could result in costly litigation or cause a decline in the Companys stock value, customer base or revenue.
Credit Risk ManagementThe Companys strategy for credit risk management includes well-defined, centralized credit policies, uniform underwriting criteria, and ongoing risk monitoring and review processes for all commercial mortgage and consumer credit exposures. The strategy also emphasizes diversification on a geographic, industry and customer level, regular credit examinations and management reviews of loans experiencing deterioration of credit quality. The Company strives to identify potential problem loans early, take any necessary charge-offs promptly and maintain adequate reserve levels for probable loan losses inherent in the portfolio. Commercial banking operations rely on a strong credit culture that combines prudent credit policies and individual lender accountability. The Company utilizes a credit risk rating system to measure the credit quality of individual commercial loan transactions and regularly forecasts potential changes in risk ratings and nonperforming status. In the Companys retail banking operations, standard credit scoring systems are used to assess consumer credit risks and to price consumer products
Analysis of Net Loan Charge-offs Total loan net charge-offs were $309.9 million and $966.6 million during the third quarter and first nine months of 2003, respectively, compared with net charge-offs of $329.0 million and $994.5 million, respectively, for the same periods of 2002. The ratio of total loan net charge-offs to average loans in the third quarter and first nine months of 2003 was 1.02 percent and 1.09 percent, respectively, compared with 1.14 percent and 1.16 percent, respectively, for the same periods of 2002. The overall level of net charge-offs in the third quarter of 2003 continued to reflect current economic conditions. Due to the Companys ongoing efforts to reduce the overall risk profile of the organization, net charge-offs are expected to continue to trend lower.
Analysis of Nonperforming Assets Nonperforming assets include nonaccrual loans, restructured loans not performing in accordance with modified terms and other real estate and other nonperforming assets owned by the Company. Interest payments on nonperforming assets are typically applied against the principal balance and not recorded as income. At September 30, 2003, total nonperforming assets were $1,318.3 million, compared with $1,373.5 million at December 31, 2002. The ratio of total nonperforming assets to total loans and other real estate decreased to 1.10 percent at September 30, 2003, compared with 1.18 percent at December 31, 2002. While nonperforming assets levels have declined, the relative level of nonperforming assets reflects the general impact of soft economic conditions during the past two years, specific weakness in the communications, transportation and manufacturing sectors, and the more pronounced affect of the economy on highly leveraged enterprise value refinancings. Given the Companys ongoing efforts to reduce the overall risk profile of the organization, nonperforming assets are expected to continue to trend lower.
Delinquent Loan Ratios
Analysis and Determination of the Allowance for Credit Losses The allowance for credit losses provides coverage for probable and estimable losses inherent in the Companys loan and lease portfolio. Management evaluates the allowance each quarter to determine that it is adequate to cover inherent losses. The evaluation of each element and the overall allowance is based on a continuing assessment of problem loans and related
Residual Risk ManagementThe Company manages its risk to changes in the value of lease residual assets through disciplined residual setting and valuation at the inception of a lease, diversification of its leased assets, regular asset valuation reviews and monitoring of residual value gains or losses upon the disposition of assets. Commercial lease originations are subject to the same well-defined underwriting standards referred to in the Credit Risk Management section which includes an evaluation of the residual risk. Retail lease residual risk is mitigated further by originating longer-term vehicle leases and effective end-of-term marketing of off-lease vehicles. Also, to reduce the financial risk of potential changes in vehicle residual values, the Company maintains residual value insurance. The catastrophic insurance maintained by the Company provides for the potential recovery of losses on individual vehicle sales in an amount equal to the difference between: (a) 105 percent or 110 percent of the average wholesale auction price for the vehicle at the time of sale and (b) the vehicle residual value specified by the Automotive Lease Guide (an authoritative industry source) at the inception of the lease. The potential recovery is calculated for each individual vehicle sold in a particular policy year and is reduced by any gains realized on vehicles sold during the same period. The Company will receive claim proceeds if, in the aggregate, there is a net loss for such period. To reduce the risk associated with collecting insurance claims, the Company monitors the financial viability of the insurance carrier based on insurance industry ratings and available financial information.
Operational Risk ManagementOperational risk represents the risk of loss resulting from the Companys operations, including, but not limited to, the risk of fraud by employees or persons outside the Company, the execution of unauthorized transactions by employees, errors relating to transaction processing and technology, breaches of the internal control system and compliance requirements and business continuation and disaster recovery. This risk of loss also includes the potential legal actions that could arise as a result of an operational deficiency or as a result of noncompliance with applicable regulatory standards, adverse business decisions or their implementation, and customer attrition due to potential negative publicity.
Interest Rate Risk ManagementIn the banking industry, a significant risk exists related to changes in interest rates. To minimize the volatility of net interest income and of the market value of assets and liabilities, the Company manages its exposure to changes in interest rates through asset and liability management activities within guidelines established by its Asset Liability Policy Committee (ALPC) and approved by the Board of Directors. ALPC has the responsibility for approving and ensuring compliance with ALPC management policies, including interest rate risk exposure. The Company uses Net Interest Income Simulation Analysis and Market Value of Equity Modeling for measuring and analyzing consolidated interest rate risk.
Net Interest Income Simulation Analysis One of the primary tools used to measure interest rate risk and the effect of interest rate changes on rate sensitive income and net interest income is simulation analysis. The monthly analysis incorporates substantially all of the Companys assets and liabilities and off-balance sheet instruments, together with forecasted changes in the balance sheet and assumptions that reflect the current interest rate environment. Through these simulations, management estimates the impact on interest rate sensitive income of a 300 basis point upward or downward gradual change of market interest rates over a one-year period. The simulations also estimate the effect of immediate and sustained parallel shifts in the yield curve of 50 basis points as well as the effect of immediate and sustained flattening or steepening of the yield curve. These simulations include assumptions about how the balance sheet is likely to be affected by changes in loan and deposit growth. Assumptions are made to project interest rates for new loans and deposits based on historical analysis, managements outlook and repricing strategies. These assumptions are validated on a periodic basis. A sensitivity analysis is provided for key variables of the simulation. The results are reviewed by ALPC monthly and are used to guide hedging strategies. ALPC policy guidelines limit the estimated change in interest rate sensitive income to 5.0 percent of forecasted interest rate sensitive income over the succeeding 12 months.
Market Value of Equity Modeling The Company also utilizes the market value of equity as a measurement tool in managing interest rate sensitivity. The market value of equity measures the degree to which the market values of the Companys assets and liabilities and off-balance sheet instruments will change given a change in interest rates. ALPC guidelines limit the change in market value of equity in a 200 basis point parallel rate shock to 15 percent of the base case. Given the low level of current interest rates, the down 200 basis point scenario cannot be computed. The up 200 basis point scenario was a 7.6 percent decrease at September 30, 2003, compared with a 2.5 percent decrease at December 31, 2002. ALPC reviews other down rate scenarios to evaluate the impact of falling interest rates. The down 100 basis point scenario was a 1.1 percent increase at September 30, 2003, and a 1.0 percent decrease at December 31, 2002. The overall sensitivity at September 30, 2003, was liability sensitive.
Use of Derivatives to Manage Interest Rate Risk In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into derivative transactions to manage its interest rate and prepayment risk (asset and liability management positions) and to accommodate the business requirements of its customers (customer-related positions). To manage its interest rate risk, the Company may enter into interest rate swap agreements and interest rate options such as caps and floors. Interest rate swaps involve the exchange of fixed-rate and variable-rate payments without the exchange of the underlying notional amount on which the interest payments are calculated. Interest rate caps protect against rising interest rates while interest rate floors protect against declining interest rates. In connection with its mortgage banking operations, the Company enters into forward commitments to sell mortgage loans related to fixed-rate mortgage loans held for sale and fixed-rate mortgage loan commitments. The Company also acts as a seller and buyer of interest rate contracts and foreign exchange rate contracts on behalf of customers. The Company minimizes its market and liquidity risks by taking substantively similar offsetting positions.
Market Risk ManagementIn addition to interest rate risk, the Company is exposed to other forms of market risk as a consequence of conducting normal trading activities. Business activities that contribute to market risk include, among other things, market making, underwriting, proprietary trading and foreign exchange positions. Value at Risk (VaR) is a key measure of market risk for the Company. Theoretically, VaR represents the maximum amount that the Company has placed at risk of loss, with a ninety-ninth percentile degree of confidence, to adverse market movements in the course of its risk taking activities.
Liquidity Risk ManagementALPC establishes policies, as well as analyzes and manages liquidity, to ensure that adequate funds are available to meet normal operating requirements in addition to unexpected customer demands for funds, such as high levels of deposit withdrawals or loan demand, in a timely and cost-effective manner. The most important factor in the preservation of liquidity is maintaining public confidence that facilitates the retention and growth of a large, stable supply of core deposits and wholesale funds. Ultimately, public confidence is generated through profitable operations, sound credit quality and a strong capital position. The Companys performance in these areas has enabled it to develop a large and reliable base of core funding within its market areas and in domestic and global capital markets. Liquidity management is viewed from long-term and short-term perspectives, as well as from an asset and liability perspective. Management monitors liquidity through a regular review of maturity profiles, funding sources, and loan and deposit forecasts to minimize funding risk.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements Conduits and asset securitizations represent a source of funding for the Company through off-balance sheet structures.
Capital ManagementThe Company is committed to managing capital for maximum shareholder benefit and maintaining strong protection for depositors and creditors. Total shareholders equity was $19.4 billion at September 30, 2003, compared with $18.1 billion at December 31, 2002. The increase was the result of corporate earnings offset primarily by dividends.
LINE OF BUSINESS FINANCIAL REVIEW
Within the Company, financial performance is measured by major lines of business, which include Wholesale Banking, Consumer Banking, Private Client, Trust and
Wholesale Bankingoffers lending, depository, treasury management and other financial services to middle market, large corporate and public sector clients. Wholesale Banking contributed $316.1 million of the Companys operating earnings for the third quarter of 2003 and $906.9 million for the first nine months of 2003, a 5.1 percent and 4.9 percent increase, respectively, over the same periods of 2002. The increase in operating earnings in the third quarter of 2003 was driven by higher net revenue and reductions in noninterest expense and provision for credit losses, compared with the same period of 2002. The increase in operating earnings in the first nine months of 2003, compared with the same period of 2002, was driven by higher net revenue and reductions in noninterest expense partially offset by higher provision for credit losses.
Consumer Bankingdelivers products and services to the broad consumer market and small businesses through banking offices, telemarketing, on-line services, direct mail and automated teller machines (ATMs). It encompasses community banking, metropolitan banking, small business banking, consumer lending, mortgage banking, workplace banking, student banking, 24-hour banking and investment product and insurance sales. Consumer Banking contributed $446.4 million of the Companys operating earnings for the third quarter of 2003 and $1,282.7 million for the first nine months of 2003, a 12.7 percent and 12.6 percent increase, respectively, over the same periods of 2002.
Private Client, Trust and Asset Managementprovides trust, private banking, financial advisory, investment management and mutual fund processing services through five businesses: Private Client Group, Corporate Trust, Asset Management, Institutional Trust and Custody and Fund Services, LLC. Private Client, Trust and Asset Management contributed $131.9 million of the Companys operating earnings for the third quarter of 2003 and $377.6 million for the first nine months of 2003, increases of 19.7 percent and 8.8 percent, respectively, over the same periods of 2002.
Payment Servicesincludes consumer and business credit cards, corporate and purchasing card services, consumer lines of credit, ATM processing, merchant processing and debit cards. Payment Services contributed $192.0 million of the Companys operating earnings for the third quarter of 2003 and $544.5 million for the first nine months of 2003, a 2.2 percent decrease and a 9.7 percent increase, respectively, over the same periods of 2002.
Capital Marketsengages in equity and fixed income trading activities, offers investment banking and underwriting services for corporate and public sector customers and provides financial advisory services and securities, mutual funds, annuities and insurance products to consumers and regionally based businesses through a network of brokerage offices. Capital Markets contributed $18.3 million of the Companys operating earnings for the third quarter of 2003 and $34.4 million for the first nine months of 2003, increases of $9.0 million (96.8 percent) and $6.6 million (23.7 percent), respectively, compared with the same periods of 2002.
Treasury and Corporate Supportincludes the Companys investment portfolios, funding, capital management and asset securitization activities, interest rate risk management, the net effect of transfer pricing related to average balances and business activities managed on a corporate basis, including enterprise-wide operations and administrative support functions. Treasury and Corporate Support recorded operating losses of $113.1 million for the third quarter of 2003 and $271.0 million for the first nine months of 2003, increases of 6.3 percent and 5.5 percent, respectively, compared with the same periods of 2002.
ACCOUNTING CHANGES
Note 2 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements discusses new accounting policies adopted by the Company during 2003 and 2002 and the expected impact of accounting policies recently issued but not yet required to be adopted. To the extent the adoption of new accounting standards affects the Companys
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The accounting and reporting policies of the Company comply with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and conform to general practices within the banking industry. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions. The financial position and results of operations can be affected by these estimates and assumptions, which are integral to understanding reported results of operations. Critical accounting policies are those policies that management believes are the most important to the portrayal of the Companys financial condition and results, and require management to make estimates that are difficult, subjective or complex. Most accounting policies are not considered by management to be critical accounting policies. Several factors are considered in determining whether or not a policy is critical in the preparation of financial statements. These factors include, among other things, whether the estimates are significant to the financial statements, the nature of the estimates, the ability to readily validate the estimates with other information including third-parties or available prices, and sensitivity of the estimates to changes in economic conditions and whether alternative accounting methods may be utilized under generally accepted accounting principles. Management has discussed the development and the selection of critical accounting policies with the Companys Audit Committee.
Allowance for Credit LossesThe allowance for credit losses is established to provide for probable losses inherent in the Companys credit portfolio. The methods utilized to estimate the allowance for credit losses, key assumptions and quantitative and qualitative information considered by management in determining the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses are discussed in the Credit Risk Management section.
Asset Impairment In the ordinary course of business, the Company evaluates the carrying value of its assets for potential impairment. Generally, potential impairment is determined based on a comparison of fair value to the carrying value. The determination of fair value can be highly subjective, especially for assets that are not actively traded or when market-based prices are not available. The Company estimates fair value based on the present value of estimated future cash flows. The initial valuation and subsequent impairment tests may require the use of significant management estimates. Additionally, determining the amount, if any, of an impairment may require an assessment of whether or not a decline in an assets estimated fair value below the recorded value is temporary in nature. While impairment assessments impact most asset categories, the following areas are considered to be critical accounting matters in relation to the financial statements.
Mortgage Servicing Rights Mortgage servicing rights (MSRs) are capitalized as separate assets when loans are sold and servicing is retained. The total cost of loans sold is allocated between the loans sold and the servicing assets retained based on their relative fair values. MSRs that are purchased from others are initially recorded at cost. The carrying value of the MSRs is amortized in proportion to and over the period of estimated net servicing revenue and recorded in noninterest expense as amortization of intangible assets. The carrying value of these assets is periodically reviewed for impairment using a lower of carrying value or fair value methodology. For purposes of measuring impairment, the servicing rights are stratified based on the underlying loan type and note rate and the carrying value for each stratum is compared to fair value based on a discounted cash flow analysis, utilizing current prepayment speeds and discount rates. Events that may significantly affect the estimates used are changes in interest rates and the related impact on mortgage loan prepayment speeds and the payment performance of the underlying loans. If the fair value is less than the carrying value, impairment is recognized through a valuation allowance for each impaired stratum and recorded as amortization of intangible assets. The reduction in the fair value of MSRs at September 30, 2003, to immediate 25 and 50 basis point decline in interest rates would be approximately $57 million and $90 million, respectively. An upward movement in interest rates at September 30, 2003, of 25 and 50 basis points would increase the fair value of the MSRs by approximately $69 million and $128 million, respectively. Refer to Note 6 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding MSRs.
Goodwill and Other Intangibles The Company records all assets and liabilities acquired in purchase acquisitions, including goodwill and other intangibles, at fair value as required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. Goodwill and indefinite-lived assets are no longer amortized but are subject, at a minimum, to annual tests for impairment. Under certain situations, interim impairment tests may be required if events occur or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting segment below its carrying amount. Other intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives using straight-line and accelerated methods and are subject to impairment if events or circumstances indicate a possible inability to realize the carrying amount.
DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Under the supervision and with the participation of the Companys management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, the Company has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 15(d)-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act)). Based upon this evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were effective in making them aware on a timely basis of the material information relating to the Company required to be included in the Companys periodic filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements" -->
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and, therefore, do not include all information and notes necessary for a complete presentation of financial position, results of operations and cash flow activity required in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. In the opinion of management of U.S. Bancorp (the Company), all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair statement of results for the interim periods have been made. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and notes included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002. Certain amounts in prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation.
Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and EquityIn May 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 150 (SFAS 150), Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity, which establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. The Company adopted SFAS 150 for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and adopted for all other financial instruments as of July 1, 2003. The adoption of SFAS 150 did not have a material impact on the Companys financial statements.
Derivative Instruments and Hedging ActivitiesIn April 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 149 (SFAS 149), Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, which amends and clarifies accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts and for hedging activities under SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. In particular, SFAS 149 clarifies under what circumstances a contract with an initial net investment meets the characteristic of a derivative and clarifies when a derivative contains a financing component. SFAS 149 is generally effective for contracts entered into or modified after June 30, 2003. The adoption of SFAS 149 did not have a material impact on the Companys financial statements.
Consolidation of Variable Interest EntitiesIn January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Interpretation No. 46 (FIN 46), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (VIEs), an interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, Consolidated Financial Statements, to improve financial reporting of special purpose and other entities. In accordance with FIN 46, business enterprises that represent the primary beneficiary of another entity by retaining a controlling financial interest in that entitys assets, liabilities and results of operating activities must consolidate the entity in its financial statements. Prior to the issuance of FIN 46, consolidation generally occurred when an enterprise controlled another entity through voting interests. Certain VIEs that are qualifying special purpose entities (QSPEs) subject to the reporting requirements of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 140 (SFAS 140), Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishment of Liabilities, will not be required to be consolidated under the provisions of FIN 46. The consolidation provisions of FIN 46 apply to VIEs created or entered into after January 31, 2003. For VIEs created before February 1, 2003, the effective date of applying the provisions of FIN 46 was deferred to periods ending after December 15, 2003. The Company plans to adopt FIN 46 for VIEs that existed prior to February 2003 during the fourth quarter of 2003.
Stock-Based CompensationIn December 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 148 (SFAS 148), Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure, an amendment of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (SFAS 123), Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. SFAS 148 provides alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. In addition, SFAS 148 requires prominent disclosures in interim as well as annual financial statements about the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method used on reported net income. SFAS 148 is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2002. The Company continues to account for stock-based employee compensation under the intrinsic based method and to provide disclosure of the impact of the fair value based method on reported income. Employee stock options have characteristics that are significantly different from those of traded options, including vesting provisions and transferability restrictions that impact their liquidity. Therefore, the existing option pricing models do not necessarily provide a reliable measure of the fair value of employee stock options. Refer to Note 11 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for proforma disclosure of the impact of stock options utilizing the Black-Scholes valuation method.
Guarantees In November 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Interpretation No. 45 (FIN 45), Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others, to clarify accounting and disclosure requirements relating to a guarantors issuance of certain types of guarantees. FIN 45 requires entities to disclose additional information about certain guarantees, or group of similar guarantees, even if the likelihood of the guarantors having to make any payments under the guarantee is remote. The disclosure provisions are effective for interim and annual financial statements for the first reporting period ending after December 15, 2002. For certain guarantees, the interpretation also requires that guarantors recognize a liability equal to the fair value of the guarantee upon its issuance. The Company adopted the initial recognition and measurement provision effective January 1, 2003, which did not have a material impact on the Companys financial statements. Refer to Note 12 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on guarantees.
Business Combinations and Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141 (SFAS 141), Business Combinations, and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142 (SFAS 142), Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. SFAS 141 mandates that the purchase method of accounting be used for all business combinations initiated after
On April 1, 2002, the Company acquired Cleveland-based The Leader Mortgage Company, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of First Defiance Corp., in a cash transaction. The transaction represented total assets acquired of $531 million and total liabilities assumed of $446 million. Included in total assets were mortgage servicing rights and other intangibles of $173 million and goodwill of $18 million. Leader specializes in acquiring servicing of loans originated for state and local housing authorities.
The following table summarizes acquisitions by the Company completed since January 1, 2002:
The Company recorded pre-tax merger and restructuring-related items of $38.6 million in the first nine months of 2003. In 2003, merger and restructuring-related items were primarily incurred in connection with the July 2001 acquisition of NOVA and with acquisitions of State Street Corporate Trust and Bay View Bank. Refer to Note 3 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding business combinations.
The components of the merger and restructuring-related items are shown below:
The following table presents a summary of activity with respect to merger and restructuring-related accruals:
The components of the merger and restructuring-related accruals for all acquisitions were as follows:
The composition of the loan portfolio was as follows:
The Companys portfolio of residential mortgages serviced for others was $51.0 billion and $43.1 billion at September 30, 2003, and December 31, 2002, respectively.
The net carrying value of capitalized mortgage servicing rights was as follows:
Changes in capitalized mortgage servicing rights are summarized as follows:
The key economic assumptions used to estimate the value of the mortgage servicing rights portfolio were as follows:
The estimated sensitivity of the fair value of the mortgage servicing rights portfolio to changes in interest rates at September 30, 2003, was as follows:
The following table reflects the changes in the carrying value of goodwill for the nine months ended September 30, 2003:
Amortizable intangible assets consisted of the following:
Aggregate amortization expense consisted of the following:
Below is the estimated amortization expense for the years ending:
The following table is a summary of the Trust Preferred Securities as of September 30, 2003:
At September 30, 2003, and December 31, 2002, the Company had authority to issue 4 billion shares of common stock and 10 million shares of preferred stock. The Company had 1,927.4 million and 1,917.0 million shares of common stock outstanding at September 30, 2003, and December 31, 2002, respectively.
The components of earnings per share were:
The following table shows proforma compensation expense, net income and earnings per share adjusted as if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123.
Guarantees and contingent liabilities of the Company as of September 30, 2003, include:
LETTERS OF CREDIT
Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments the Company issues to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third-party. The guarantees frequently support public and private borrowing arrangements, including
GUARANTEES
Guarantees are contingent commitments issued by the Company to customers or other third-parties. The Companys guarantees primarily include parent guarantees related to subsidiaries third-party borrowing arrangements; third-party performance guarantees inherent in the Companys business operations such as indemnified securities lending programs and merchant charge-back guarantees; indemnification or buy-back provisions related to certain asset sales; synthetic lease guarantees; and contingent consideration arrangements related to acquisitions. For certain guarantees, the Company has recorded a liability related to the potential obligation, or has access to collateral to support the guarantee or through the exercise of other recourse provisions can offset some or all of the maximum potential future payments made under these guarantees. The estimated fair value of guarantees, other than standby letters of credit, was approximately $114 million at September 30, 2003.
Third-Party Borrowing ArrangementsThe Company provides guarantees to third-parties as a part of certain subsidiaries borrowing arrangements, primarily representing guaranteed operating or capital lease payments or other debt obligations with maturity dates extending through 2014. The maximum potential future payments guaranteed by the Company under these arrangements was approximately $1.6 billion at September 30, 2003. The Companys recorded liabilities as of September 30, 2003, included $43.2 million representing outstanding amounts owed to these third-parties and required to be recorded on balance sheet in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
Commitments from Securities LendingThe Company participates in securities lending activities by acting as the customers agent involving the loan or sale of securities. The Company indemnifies customers for the difference between the market value of the securities lent and the market value of the collateral received. Cash collateralizes these transactions. The maximum potential future payments guaranteed by the Company under these arrangements was approximately $12.9 billion at September 30, 2003, and represented the market value of the securities lent to third-parties. At September 30, 2003, the Company held assets with a market value of $13.3 billion as collateral for these arrangements.
Asset Sales The Company has provided guarantees to certain third-parties in connection with the sale of certain assets, primarily loan portfolios and low-income housing tax credits. These guarantees are generally in the form of asset buy-back or make-whole provisions that are triggered upon a credit event or a change in the tax-qualifying status of the related projects, as applicable, and remain in effect until the loans are collected or final tax credits are realized, respectively. The maximum potential future payments guaranteed by the Company under these arrangements were approximately $940.1 million at September 30, 2003, and represented the total proceeds received from the buyer in these transactions where the buy-back or make-whole provisions have not yet expired. Recourse available to the Company includes guarantees from the Small Business Administration (for SBA loans sold), recourse against the correspondent that originated the loan or to the private mortgage issuer, the right to collect payments from the debtors, and/or the right to liquidate the underlying collateral, if any, and retain the proceeds. Based on its established loan-to-value guidelines, the Company believes the recourse available is sufficient to recover future payments, if any, under the loan buy-back guarantees.
Merchant ProcessingThe Company, through its subsidiary NOVA Information Systems, Inc., provides merchant processing services. Under the rules of credit card associations, a merchant processor retains a contingent liability for credit card transactions processed. This contingent liability arises in the event of a billing dispute between the merchant and a cardholder that is ultimately resolved in the cardholders favor. In this situation, the transaction is
Contingent Consideration ArrangementsThe Company has contingent payment obligations related to certain business combination transactions. Payments must be made as long as certain post-acquisition performance-based criteria are met or customer relationships are maintained. At September 30, 2003, the maximum potential future payments required to be made by the Company under these arrangements was approximately $75.0 million and primarily represented contingent payments related to the acquisition of State Street Corporate Trust business on December 31, 2002. If required, these contingent payments would be payable within the next 3 to 9 months.
Other Guarantees The Company provides liquidity and credit enhancement facilities to a Company-sponsored conduit, as more fully described in the Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements section within Managements Discussion and Analysis. Although management believes a draw against these facilities is remote, the maximum potential future payments guaranteed by the Company under these arrangements was approximately $7.8 billion at September 30, 2003. The recorded fair value of the Companys liability for the credit enhancement recourse obligation and liquidity facilities was $26.7 million at September 30, 2003, and was included in other liabilities.
OTHER CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
In connection with the industry-wide investigations of research analyst independence issues, the Companys Capital Markets business line established a $50.0 million liability for probable claims that, in part, included a settlement with certain governmental and regulatory agencies of $25.0 million for investment banking regulatory matters and $7.5 million for funding independent analyst research for its customers.
Consolidated Statement of Cash FlowsListed below are supplemental disclosures to the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows:
Money Market Investmentsare included with cash and due from banks as part of cash and cash equivalents. Money market investments consisted of the following:
Part II -- Other Information" -->
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) Exhibits
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
SIGNATURE
EXHIBIT 12
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
I, Jerry A. Grundhofer, Chief Executive Officer of U.S. Bancorp, a Delaware corporation, certify that:
Dated: November 14, 2003
EXHIBIT 31.2
I, David M. Moffett, Chief Financial Officer of U.S. Bancorp, a Delaware corporation, certify that:
EXHIBIT 32
Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. section 1350), the undersigned, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of U.S. Bancorp, a Delaware corporation (the Company), do hereby certify that:
Executive Offices
U.S. Bancorp
Common Stock Transfer Agent and Registrar
Mellon Investor Services
For Registered or Certified Mail:
Telephone representatives are available weekdays from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Central Time, and automated support is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Specific information about your account is available on Mellons Internet site by clicking on the Investor ServicesDirectSM link.
Independent Auditors
Common Stock Listing and Trading
Dividends and Reinvestment Plan
Investment Community Contacts
Judith T. Murphy
Financial Information
Web site. For information about U.S. Bancorp, including news, financial results, annual reports and other documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, access our home page on the Internet at usbank.com and click on Investor/ Shareholder Information.
Mail. At your request, we will mail to you our quarterly earnings news releases, quarterly financial data reported on Form 10-Q and additional copies of our annual reports. Please contact:
U.S. Bancorp Investor Relations
Media Requests
Privacy
U.S. Bancorp is committed to respecting the privacy of our customers and safeguarding the financial and personal information provided to us. To learn more about the U.S. Bancorp commitment to protecting privacy, visit usbank.com and click on Privacy Pledge.
Code of Ethics
U.S. Bancorp places the highest importance on honesty and integrity. Each year, every U.S. Bancorp employee certifies compliance with the letter and spirit of our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct, the guiding ethical standards of our organization. For details about our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct, visit usbank.com and click on About U.S. Bancorp, then Ethics at U.S. Bank.
Diversity
U.S. Bancorp and our subsidiaries are committed to developing and maintaining a workplace that reflects the diversity of the communities we serve. We support a work environment where individual differences are valued and respected and where each individual who shares the fundamental values of the company has an opportunity to contribute and grow based on individual merit.
Equal Employment Opportunity/Affirmative Action
U.S. Bancorp and our subsidiaries are committed to providing Equal Employment Opportunity to all employees and applicants for employment. In keeping with this commitment, employment decisions are made based upon performance, skills and abilities, rather than race, color, religion, national origin or ancestry, gender, age, disability, veteran status, sexual orientation or any other factors protected by law. The corporation complies with municipal, state and federal fair employment laws, including regulations applying to federal contractors.
U.S. Bancorp, including each of our subsidiaries, is an Equal Opportunity Employer committed to creating a diverse workforce.
This report has been produced on recycled paper.