UNITED STATES
x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004
OR
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
For the transition period from (not applicable)
Commission file number 1-6880
U.S. BANCORP
800 Nicollet Mall
651-466-3000
(not applicable)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
YES X NO
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of Contents and Form 10-Q Cross Reference Index
Forward-Looking Statements
Managements Discussion and Analysis" -->
OVERVIEW
Earnings SummaryU.S. Bancorp and its subsidiaries (the Company) reported net income of $1,065.5 million for the third quarter of 2004, or $.56 per diluted share, compared with $950.9 million, or $.49 per diluted share, for the third quarter of 2003. Return on average assets and return on average equity were 2.21 percent and 21.9 percent, respectively, for the third quarter of 2004, compared with returns of 1.98 percent and 19.5 percent, respectively, for the third quarter of 2003. The Companys results for the third quarter of 2004 improved over the third quarter of 2003, primarily due to lower credit costs and growth in fee-based products and services. Included in the third quarter of 2004 were net gains on the sale of securities of $87.3 million, a net increase of $196.2 million over net securities losses realized in the third quarter of 2003. The third quarter of 2004 also included the recognition of $86.7 million of mortgage servicing rights (MSR) impairment, a $195.2 million unfavorable variance over the third quarter of 2003. Operating expenses for the third quarter of 2004 also reflected a reduction in pre-tax merger and restructuring-related items of $10.2 million ($6.7 million on an after-tax basis), compared with the third quarter of 2003. The $10.2 million decline in pre-tax merger and restructuring-related charges was primarily due to the completion in 2003 of integration activities associated with the acquisition of NOVA Corporation (NOVA) and other smaller acquisitions.
STATEMENT OF INCOME ANALYSIS
Net Interest IncomeIn the third quarter of 2004 net interest income, on a taxable-equivalent basis, was $1,781.7 million, compared with $1,825.5 million in the third quarter of 2003, which represented a $43.8 million (2.4 percent) decrease from 2003. Net interest income for the first nine months of 2004, on a taxable equivalent basis, was $5,340.1 million, compared with $5,400.8 million for the first nine months of 2003, which represented a $60.7 million (1.1 percent) decrease from a year ago. The decline in net interest income for the third quarter and first nine months reflected modest growth in average earning assets, more than offset by lower net interest margins. Average earning assets in the third quarter and first nine months of 2004 increased $4.3 billion (2.6 percent) and $7.4 billion (4.6 percent), respectively, over the comparable periods of 2003. The increase in average earning assets for the third quarter and first nine months of 2004, compared with the same periods of 2003, was primarily driven by increases in investment securities, retail loans and residential mortgages, partially offset by a decline in commercial loans and loans held for sale related to mortgage banking activities. The net interest margin for the third quarter and first nine months of 2004 was 4.22 percent and 4.26 percent, respectively, compared with 4.43 percent and 4.51 percent for the comparable periods of 2003. The year-over-year decline in the net interest margin primarily reflected tighter credit spreads, a modest increase in the percent of total earning assets funded by wholesale sources of funding and higher rates paid on wholesale funding due to the impact of rising rates. The shift toward wholesale funding reflects, in part, asset/liability decisions to issue longer-term fixed-rate borrowings. In addition, the net interest margin declined for the first nine months of 2004 as a result of consolidating high credit quality, low margin loans from
Provision for Credit LossesThe provision for credit losses was $165.1 million and $310.0 million for the third quarter of 2004 and 2003, respectively, a year-over-year decrease of $144.9 million (46.7 percent). For the first nine months of 2004 and 2003, the provision for credit losses was $604.6 million and $968.0 million, respectively, a decrease of $363.4 million (37.5 percent). The decline from a year ago was primarily the result of lower nonperforming assets and lower retail and commercial loan losses, which were the result of an improving credit risk profile due to more favorable economic conditions, collection efforts and higher commercial loan recoveries. Refer to the Corporate Risk Profile section for further information on the provision for credit losses, net charge-offs, nonperforming assets and other factors considered by the Company in assessing the credit quality of the loan portfolio and establishing the allowance for credit losses.
Noninterest IncomeNoninterest income during the third quarter of 2004 was $1,524.0 million, an increase of $346.6 million (29.4 percent) from the third quarter of 2003. Noninterest income during the first nine months of 2004 was $4,084.0 million, compared with $4,016.4 million for the first nine months of 2003, which represented an increase of $67.6 million
Noninterest ExpenseThird quarter of 2004 noninterest expense was $1,519.0 million, an increase of $265.7 million (21.2 percent) from the third quarter of 2003. For the first nine months of 2004, noninterest expense was $4,206.5 million, a reduction of $48.0 million (1.1 percent) from the first nine months of 2003. The year-over-year increase during the third quarter was primarily due to the unfavorable change in MSR valuations of $195.2 million, while the year-over-year decrease during the first nine months was primarily due to the favorable change in MSR valuations of $183.8 million. Refer to Note 6 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a sensitivity analysis on the fair value of MSR to future changes in interest rates. The favorable variance in merger and restructuring-related charges in the third quarter and first nine months of 2004 of $10.2 million and $38.6 million, respectively, was primarily due to the completion of integration activities associated with NOVA and other smaller acquisitions in 2003. Included in these variances in the third quarter and first nine months of 2004, were increases in compensation, employee benefits, marketing and business development, technology and communications and operating expenses related to the expansion of the Companys merchant acquiring business in Europe, including certain business integration costs. During the third quarter of 2004, expenses related to the expansion of the Companys merchant acquiring business in Europe accounted for approximately $29 million of the year-over-year increase, including $6 million of business integration costs. Compensation expense increased during the third quarter and first nine months of 2004, compared with the same periods of 2003, due to an increase in salaries, primarily due to in-store branch expansion, and performance-based incentives. Employee benefits increased primarily as a result of higher pension expense and higher payroll taxes. Pension and retirement expense increased by $14.7 million and $22.0 million, during the third quarter and first nine months of 2004, respectively, compared with the same periods of 2003. Marketing and business development expense increased by $12.0 million (24.7 percent) in the third quarter of 2004 and $15.1 million (11.7 percent) in the first nine months of 2004, compared with the same periods of 2003, reflecting the increase and timing of marketing campaigns. Technology and communications expense was higher year-over-year by $7.7 million (7.5 percent) and $2.8 million (.9 percent), during the third quarter and first nine months of 2004, respectively, primarily due to outsourcing certain institutional trust participant record-keeping functions and capital expenditures for imaging and other electronic payment initiatives. Other expense increased $16.8 million (8.4 percent) and $71.3 million (12.6 percent) in the third quarter and first nine months of 2004, respectively, compared with the same periods of 2003. The year-over-year increase during the first nine months of 2004
Income Tax ExpenseThe provision for income taxes was $549.0 million (an effective rate of 34.0 percent) for the third quarter of 2004 and $1,480.9 million (an effective rate of 32.3 percent) for the first nine months of 2004, compared with $491.9 million (an effective rate of 34.3 percent) and $1,433.9 million (an effective rate of 34.4 percent) for the same periods of 2003. The improvement in the effective tax rate in the first nine months of 2004 primarily reflected a $90.0 million reduction in income tax expense in the first quarter of 2004 related to the resolution of federal tax examinations covering substantially all of the Companys legal entities for the years 1995 through 1999.
BALANCE SHEET ANALYSIS
Loans The Companys total loan portfolio was $124.8 billion at September 30, 2004, compared with $118.2 billion at December 31, 2003, an increase of $6.6 billion (5.6 percent). The increase in total loans was driven by growth in retail loans, commercial loans and residential mortgages. Commercial loans, including lease financing, totaled $40.2 billion at September 30, 2004, compared with $38.5 billion at December 31, 2003, an increase of $1.6 billion (4.2 percent). The increase in commercial loans was driven by new customer relationships, increased utilization under lines of credit by commercial customers and increases in corporate card balances. The Companys portfolio of commercial real estate loans, which includes commercial mortgages and construction loans, was $27.4 billion at September 30, 2004, compared with $27.2 billion at December 31, 2003.
Loans Held for SaleLoans held for sale, consisting primarily of residential mortgages to be sold in the secondary markets, were $1,372 million at September 30, 2004, compared with $1,433 million at December 31, 2003. The decrease of $61 million (4.3 percent) was primarily due to the timing of loan originations and sales during the first nine months of 2004. Mortgage loan production is highly correlated to changes in interest rates with declines in balances during a period of rising interest rates.
Investment SecuritiesAt September 30, 2004, investment securities, both available-for-sale and held-to-maturity, totaled $39.7 billion, compared with $43.3 billion at December 31, 2003. The $3.7 billion (8.5 percent) decrease primarily reflected the sale of $6.4 billion of fixed-rate securities, along with maturities and prepayments, partially offset by purchases of primarily floating-rate securities. At September 30, 2004, approximately 35.9 percent of the investment securities portfolio represented adjustable-rate financial instruments, compared with 22.2 percent as of December 31, 2003. Adjustable-rate financial instruments include variable-rate collateralized mortgage obligations, mortgage-backed securities, agency securities, adjustable-rate money market accounts and asset-backed securities.
Deposits Total deposits were $115.6 billion at September 30, 2004, compared with $119.1 billion at December 31, 2003, a decrease of $3.5 billion (2.9 percent). The decrease in total deposits was primarily the result of decreases in noninterest-bearing deposits, interest checking, money market accounts and time certificates of deposit less than $100,000, partially offset by increases in time deposits greater than $100,000.
Borrowings The Company utilizes both short-term and long-term borrowings to fund growth of earning assets in excess of deposit growth. Short-term borrowings,
The weighted-average maturity of the available-for-sale investment securities was 5.32 years at September 30, 2004, compared with 5.12 years at December 31, 2003. The corresponding weighted-average yields were 4.29% and 4.27%, respectively. The weighted-average maturity of the held-to-maturity investment securities was 7.00 years at September 30, 2004, compared with 6.16 years at December 31, 2003. The corresponding weighted-averaged yields were 6.33% and 6.05%, respectively.
CORPORATE RISK PROFILE
Overview Managing risks is an essential part of successfully operating a financial services company. The most prominent risk exposures are credit, residual, operational, interest rate, market and liquidity risk. Credit risk is the risk of not collecting the interest and/or the principal balance of a loan or investment when it is due. Residual risk is the potential reduction in the end-of-term value of leased assets or the residual cash flows related to asset securitization and other off-balance sheet structures. Operational risk includes risks related to fraud, legal and compliance risk, processing errors, technology, breaches of internal controls and business continuation and disaster recovery risk. Interest rate risk is the potential reduction of net interest income as a result of changes in interest rates. Rate movements can affect the repricing of assets and liabilities differently, as well as their market value. Market risk arises from fluctuations in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and equity prices that may result in changes in the values of financial instruments, such as trading and available-for-sale securities that are accounted for on a mark-to-market basis. Liquidity risk is the possible inability to fund obligations to depositors, investors or borrowers. In addition, corporate strategic decisions, as well as the risks described above, could give rise to reputation risk. Reputation risk is the risk that negative publicity or press, whether true or not, could result in costly litigation or cause a decline in the Companys stock value, customer base or revenue.
Credit Risk ManagementThe Companys strategy for credit risk management includes well-defined, centralized credit policies, uniform underwriting criteria, and ongoing risk monitoring and review processes for all commercial and consumer credit exposures. The strategy also emphasizes diversification on a geographic, industry and customer level, regular credit examinations and management reviews of loans experiencing deterioration of credit quality. The credit risk management strategy also includes a credit risk assessment process completely independent of Company management that performs assessments of compliance with commercial and consumer credit policies, risk ratings, and other critical credit information. The Company strives to identify potential problem loans early, take any necessary charge-offs promptly and maintain adequate reserve levels for probable loan losses inherent in the portfolio. Commercial banking operations rely on a strong credit culture that combines prudent credit policies and individual lender accountability. Lenders are assigned lending grades based on their level of experience and customer service requirements. Lending grades represent the level of approval authority for the amount of credit exposure and level of risk. Credit officers reporting independently to Credit Administration have higher levels of lending grades and support the business units in their credit decision process. Loan decisions are documented as to the borrowers business, purpose of the loan, evaluation of the repayment source and the associated risks, evaluation of collateral, covenants and monitoring requirements, and risk rating rationale. The Company utilizes a credit risk rating system to measure the credit quality of individual commercial loan transactions. The Company uses the risk rating system for regulatory reporting, determining the frequency of review of the credit exposures, and evaluation and determination of the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses. The Company regularly forecasts potential changes in risk ratings, nonperforming status and potential for loss and the estimated impact on the allowance for credit losses. In the Companys retail banking operations, standard credit scoring systems are used to assess credit risks of consumer, small business and small-ticket leasing customers and to price these products accordingly. The Company conducts the underwriting and collections of its retail products in loan underwriting and servicing centers specializing in certain retail products. Forecasts of delinquency levels, bankruptcies and losses in conjunction with projection of estimated losses by delinquency categories and vintage information are regularly prepared
Changes in Nonperforming Assets
Analysis of Nonperforming Assets Nonperforming assets represent a key indicator, among other considerations, of the potential for future credit losses. Nonperforming assets include nonaccrual loans, restructured loans not performing in accordance with modified terms and other real estate and other nonperforming assets owned by the Company. Interest payments on nonperforming assets are typically applied against the principal balance and not recorded as income. At September 30, 2004, total nonperforming assets were $804.6 million, compared with $1,148.1 million at December 31, 2003. The ratio of total nonperforming assets to total loans and other real estate decreased to .64 percent at September 30, 2004, compared with .97 percent at December 31, 2003. The improvement in credit quality has been broad-based across most industry categories reflecting continued improvement in economic conditions. While nonperforming assets are expected to continue to decline slightly during the next few quarters, the ongoing level of nonperforming assets is expected to stabilize in mid-2005.
The following table provides summary delinquency information for residential mortgages and retail loans:
Analysis of Net Loan Charge-offs Total loan net charge-offs were $165.1 million and $603.5 million during the third quarter and first nine months of 2004, respectively, compared with net charge-offs of $309.9 million and $966.6 million, respectively, for the same periods of 2003. The ratio of total loan net charge-offs to average loans in the third quarter and first nine months of 2004 was .53 percent and .67 percent, respectively, compared with 1.02 percent and 1.09 percent, respectively, for the same periods of 2003. The overall level of net charge-offs in the third quarter and first nine months of 2004 reflected the Companys ongoing efforts to reduce the overall risk profile of the organization, improved economic conditions, higher commercial loan recoveries in the third quarter of 2004, refinancings by customers and higher asset valuations. Net charge-offs are expected to increase modestly as commercial loan recoveries return to more normal levels in future periods.
The following table provides an analysis of net charge-offs as a percentage of average loans outstanding managed by the consumer finance division, compared with traditional branch-related loans:
Analysis and Determination of the Allowance for Credit Losses The allowance for credit losses provides coverage for probable and estimable losses inherent in the Companys loan and lease portfolio. Management evaluates the allowance each quarter to determine that it is adequate to cover inherent losses. The evaluation of each element and the overall allowance is based on a continuing assessment of problem loans and related off-balance sheet items, recent loss experience and other factors, including regulatory guidance and economic conditions.
Residual Risk ManagementThe Company manages its risk to changes in the residual value of leased assets through disciplined residual valuation setting at the inception of a lease, diversification of its leased assets, regular asset valuation reviews and monitoring of residual value gains or losses upon the disposition of assets. Commercial lease originations are subject to the same well-defined underwriting standards referred to in the Credit Risk Management section which includes an evaluation of the residual risk. Retail lease residual risk is mitigated further by originating longer-term vehicle leases and effective end-of-term marketing of off-lease vehicles. Also, to reduce the financial risk of potential changes in vehicle residual values, the Company maintains residual value insurance. The catastrophic insurance maintained by the Company provides for the potential recovery of losses on individual vehicle sales in an amount equal to the difference between: (a) 105 percent or 110 percent of the average wholesale auction price for the vehicle at the time of sale and (b) the vehicle residual value specified by the Automotive Lease Guide (an authoritative industry source) at the inception of the lease. The potential recovery is calculated for each individual vehicle sold in a particular policy year and is reduced by any gains realized on vehicles sold during the same period. The Company will receive claim proceeds under this insurance program if, in the aggregate, there is a net loss for such period. In addition, the Company obtains separate residual value insurance for all vehicles at lease inception where end of lease term settlement is based solely on the residual value of the individual leased vehicles. Under this program, the potential recovery is computed for each individual vehicle sold and does not allow the insurance carrier to offset individually determined losses with gains from other leases. This individual vehicle coverage is included in the calculation of minimum lease payments when making the capital lease assessment. To reduce the risk associated with collecting insurance claims, the Company monitors the financial viability of the insurance carrier based on insurance industry ratings and available financial information.
Operational Risk ManagementOperational risk represents the risk of loss resulting from the Companys operations, including, but not limited to, the risk of fraud by employees or persons outside the Company, the execution of unauthorized transactions by employees, errors relating to transaction processing and technology, breaches of the internal control system and compliance requirements and business continuation and disaster recovery. This risk of loss also includes the potential legal actions that could arise as a result of an operational deficiency or as a result of noncompliance with applicable regulatory standards, adverse business
Interest Rate Risk ManagementIn the banking industry, a significant risk exists related to changes in interest rates. To minimize the volatility of net interest income and of the market value of assets and liabilities, the Company manages its exposure to changes in interest rates through asset and liability management activities within guidelines established by its Asset Liability Policy Committee (ALPC) and approved by the Board of Directors. ALPC has the responsibility for approving and ensuring compliance with ALPC management policies, including interest rate risk exposure. The Company uses Net Interest Income Simulation Analysis and Market Value of Equity Modeling for measuring and analyzing consolidated interest rate risk.
Net Interest Income Simulation Analysis One of the primary tools used to measure interest rate risk and the effect of interest rate changes on rate sensitive income and net interest income is simulation analysis. The monthly analysis incorporates substantially all of the Companys assets and liabilities and off-balance sheet instruments, together with forecasted changes in the balance sheet and assumptions that reflect the current interest rate environment. Through these simulations, management estimates the impact on interest rate sensitive income of a 300 basis point upward or downward gradual change of market interest rates over a one-year period. The simulations also estimate the effect of immediate and sustained parallel shifts in the yield curve of 50 basis points as well as the effect of immediate and sustained flattening or steepening of the yield curve. These simulations include assumptions about how the balance sheet is likely to be affected by changes in loan and deposit growth. Assumptions are made to project interest rates for new loans and deposits based on historical analysis, managements outlook and repricing strategies. These assumptions are validated on a periodic basis. A sensitivity analysis is provided for key variables of the simulation. The results are reviewed by ALPC monthly and are used to guide hedging strategies. ALPC policy guidelines limit the estimated change in interest rate sensitive income to
Sensitivity of Net Interest Income and Rate Sensitive Income:
Market Value of Equity Modeling The Company also utilizes the market value of equity as a measurement tool in managing interest rate sensitivity. The market value of equity measures the degree to which the market values of the Companys assets and liabilities and off-balance sheet instruments will change given a change in interest rates. ALPC guidelines limit the change in market value of equity in a 200 basis point parallel rate shock to 15 percent of the market value of equity assuming interest rates at September 30, 2004. Given the low level of current interest rates, the down 200 basis point scenario cannot be computed. The up 200 basis point scenario resulted in a 1.9 percent decrease in the market value of equity at September 30, 2004, compared with a 3.1 percent decrease at December 31, 2003. ALPC reviews other down rate scenarios to evaluate the impact of falling interest rates. The down 100 basis point scenario resulted in a 1.4 percent decrease at September 30, 2004, and a 1.3 percent increase at December 31, 2003. At September 30, 2004, and December 31, 2003, the Company was within its policy guidelines.
Use of Derivatives to Manage Interest Rate and Foreign Currency Risk In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into derivative transactions to manage its interest rate, prepayment, and foreign currency risks (asset and liability management positions) and to accommodate the business requirements of its customers (customer-related positions). To manage its interest rate risk, the Company may enter into interest rate swap agreements and interest rate options such as caps and floors. Interest rate swaps involve the exchange of fixed-rate and variable-rate payments without the exchange of the underlying notional amount on which the interest payments are calculated. Interest rate caps protect against rising interest rates while interest rate floors protect against declining interest rates. In connection with its mortgage banking operations, the Company enters into forward commitments to sell mortgage loans related to fixed-rate mortgage loans held for sale and fixed-rate mortgage loan commitments. The Company also acts as a seller and buyer of interest rate contracts and foreign exchange rate contracts on behalf
Market Risk ManagementIn addition to interest rate risk, the Company is exposed to other forms of market risk as a consequence of conducting normal trading activities. Business activities that contribute to market risk include, among other things, proprietary trading and foreign exchange positions. Value at Risk (VaR) is a key measure of market risk for the Company. Theoretically, VaR represents the maximum amount that the Company has placed at risk of loss, with a ninety-ninth percentile degree of confidence, to adverse market movements in the course of its risk taking activities.
Liquidity Risk ManagementALPC establishes policies, as well as analyzes and manages liquidity, to ensure that
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements Off-balance sheet arrangements include any contractual arrangement to which an unconsolidated entity is a party, under which the Company has an obligation to provide credit or liquidity enhancements or market risk support. Off-balance sheet arrangements include certain defined guarantees, asset securitization trusts and conduits. Off-balance sheet arrangements also include any obligation under a variable interest held by an unconsolidated entity that provides financing, liquidity, credit enhancement or market risk support.
Capital ManagementThe Company is committed to managing capital for maximum shareholder benefit and maintaining strong protection for depositors and creditors. The Company has targeted returning 80 percent of earnings to our shareholders through a combination of dividends and share repurchases. In keeping with this target, the Company returned 94 percent of earnings and 110 percent of earnings during the third quarter and first nine months of 2004, respectively. Total shareholders equity was $19.6 billion at September 30, 2004, compared with $19.2 billion at December 31, 2003. The increase was the result of corporate earnings offset by dividends and share repurchases.
LINE OF BUSINESS FINANCIAL REVIEW
Within the Company, financial performance is measured by major lines of business, which include Wholesale Banking, Consumer Banking, Private Client, Trust and Asset Management, Payment Services and Treasury and Corporate Support. These operating segments are components of the Company about which financial information is available and is evaluated regularly in deciding how to allocate resources and assess performance.
Basis for Financial PresentationBusiness line results are derived from the Companys business unit profitability reporting systems by specifically attributing managed balance sheet assets, deposits and other liabilities and their related income or expense. Funds transfer-pricing methodologies are utilized to allocate a cost of funds used or credit for funds provided to all business line assets and liabilities using a matched funding concept. Also, the business unit is allocated the taxable-equivalent benefit of tax-exempt products. Noninterest income and expenses directly managed by each business line, including fees, service charges, salaries and benefits, and other direct costs are accounted for within each segments financial results in a manner similar to the consolidated financial statements. Occupancy costs are allocated based on utilization of facilities by the lines of business. Certain expenses, including charges for potential litigation and liabilities for certain guarantees, are included in the line of business results upon final resolution. Noninterest expenses incurred by centrally managed operations or business lines that directly support another business lines operations are charged to the applicable business line based on its utilization of those services primarily measured by the volume of customer activities. These allocated expenses are reported as net shared services expense. Certain corporate activities that do not directly support the operations of the lines of business are not charged to the lines of business. Goodwill and other intangible assets are assigned to the lines of business based on the mix of business of the acquired entity. The provision for credit losses within the Wholesale Banking, Consumer Banking, Private Client, Trust and Asset Management and Payment Services lines of business is based on net charge-offs, while Treasury and Corporate Support reflects the residual component of the Companys total consolidated provision for credit losses determined in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Income taxes are assessed to each line of business at a standard tax rate with the residual tax expense or benefit to arrive at the consolidated effective tax rate included in Treasury and Corporate Support. Merger and restructuring-related charges, discontinued operations and cumulative effects of changes in accounting principles are not identified by or allocated to lines of business. Within the Company, capital levels are evaluated and managed centrally; however, capital is allocated to the operating segments to support evaluation of business performance. Capital allocations to the business lines are based on the amount of goodwill and other intangibles, the extent of off-balance sheet managed assets and lending commitments and the ratio of on-balance sheet assets relative to the total Company. Certain lines of business, such as Trust and Asset Management, have no significant balance sheet components. For these business units, capital is allocated taking into consideration fiduciary and operational risk, capital levels of
Wholesale Bankingoffers lending, depository, treasury management and other financial services to middle market, large corporate and public sector clients. Wholesale Banking contributed $278.0 million of the Companys operating earnings for the third quarter of 2004 and $795.1 million for the first nine months of 2004, increases of $64.8 million (30.4 percent) and $157.8 million (24.8 percent), respectively, compared with the same periods of 2003. The increase in operating earnings in the third quarter of 2004 and the first nine months of 2004, compared with the same periods of 2003, was driven by reductions in the provision for credit losses and total noninterest expense, partially offset by a decline in total net revenue.
Consumer Bankingdelivers products and services to the broad consumer market and small businesses through banking offices, telemarketing, on-line services, direct mail and automated teller machines (ATMs). It encompasses community banking, metropolitan banking, branch ATM banking, small business banking, including lending guaranteed by the Small Business Administration, small-ticket leasing, consumer lending, mortgage banking, workplace banking, student banking, 24-hour banking and investment product and insurance sales. Consumer Banking contributed $409.5 million of the Companys operating earnings for the third quarter of 2004 and $1,073.1 million for the first nine months of 2004, an increase of $54.3 million (15.3 percent) and $73.8 million (7.4 percent), respectively, compared with the same periods of 2003. Within Consumer Banking, the retail banking business grew operating earnings by 26.2 percent in the third quarter of 2004 and 21.4 percent in the first nine months of 2004, offset somewhat by lower contribution from the mortgage banking business, compared with the same periods of 2003.
Private Client, Trust and Asset Managementprovides trust, private banking, financial advisory, investment management and mutual fund and alternative investment product services through five businesses: Private Client Group, Corporate Trust, Asset Management, Institutional Trust and Custody and Fund Services, LLC. Private Client, Trust and Asset Management contributed $110.8 million of the Companys operating earnings for the third quarter of 2004 and $330.0 million for the first nine months of 2004, increases of 11.6 percent and 15.9 percent, respectively, compared with the same periods of 2003. The period-over-period increases for the third quarter of 2004 and first nine months of 2004 were attributable to growth in total net revenue (4.1 percent and 7.2 percent, respectively) and a reduction in noninterest expense (1.7 percent and 1.9 percent, respectively), partially offset by an increase in the provision for credit losses for the first nine months of 2004.
Payment Servicesincludes consumer and business credit cards, debit cards, corporate and purchasing card services, consumer lines of credit, ATM processing and merchant processing. Payment Services contributed $185.0 million of the Companys operating earnings for the third quarter of 2004 and $524.5 million for the first nine months of 2004, a 20.4 percent and 21.3 percent increase, respectively, over the same periods of 2003. The increases were due to growth in total net revenue and reductions in provision for credit losses, partially offset by increases in total noninterest expense.
Treasury and Corporate Supportincludes the Companys investment portfolios, funding, capital management and asset securitization activities, interest rate risk management, the net effect of transfer pricing related to average balances and the residual aggregate of expenses associated with business activities managed on a corporate basis, including enterprise-wide operations and administrative support functions. Operational expenses incurred by Treasury and Corporate Support on behalf of the other business lines are allocated back primarily based on customer transaction volume and account activities to the appropriate business unit and are identified as net shared services expense. Treasury and Corporate Support recorded operating earnings of $82.2 million for the third quarter of 2004 and $388.1 million for the first nine months of 2004, a decrease of $43.9 million (34.8 percent) and $23.3 million (5.7 percent), respectively, compared with the same periods of 2003.
ACCOUNTING CHANGES
Note 2 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements discusses new accounting policies adopted by the Company during 2004 and the expected impact of accounting policies recently issued but not yet required to be adopted. To the extent the adoption of new accounting standards affects the Companys financial condition, results of operations or liquidity, the impacts are discussed in the applicable section(s) of Managements Discussion and Analysis and the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The accounting and reporting policies of the Company comply with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and conform to general practices within the banking industry. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions. The financial position and results of operations can be affected by these estimates and assumptions, which are integral to understanding the Companys financial statements. Critical accounting policies are those policies that management believes are the most important to the portrayal of the Companys financial condition and results, and require management to make estimates that are difficult, subjective or complex. Most accounting policies are not considered by management to be critical accounting policies. Several factors are considered in determining whether or not a policy is critical in the preparation of financial statements. These factors include, among other things, whether the estimates are significant to the financial statements, the nature of the estimates, the ability to readily validate the estimates with other information including third-parties or available prices, and sensitivity of the estimates to changes in economic conditions and whether alternative accounting methods may be utilized under generally accepted accounting principles. Management has discussed the development and the selection of critical accounting policies with the Companys Audit Committee.
Allowance for Credit LossesThe allowance for credit losses is established to provide for probable losses inherent in the Companys credit portfolio. The methods utilized to estimate the allowance for credit losses, key assumptions and quantitative and qualitative information considered by management in determining the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses are discussed in the Credit Risk Management section.
Asset Impairment In the ordinary course of business, the Company evaluates the carrying value of its assets for potential impairment. Generally, potential impairment is determined based on a comparison of fair value to the carrying value. The determination of fair value can be highly subjective, especially for assets that are not actively traded or when market-based prices are not available. The Company estimates fair value based on the present value of estimated future cash flows. The initial valuation and subsequent impairment tests may require the use of significant management estimates. Additionally, determining the amount, if any, of an impairment may require an assessment of whether or not a decline in an assets estimated fair value below the recorded value is temporary in nature. While impairment assessments impact most asset categories, the following areas are considered to be critical accounting matters in relation to the financial statements.
Mortgage Servicing Rights MSRs are capitalized as separate assets when loans are sold and servicing is retained. The total cost of loans sold is allocated between the loans sold and the servicing assets retained based on their relative fair values. MSRs that are purchased from others are initially recorded at cost. The carrying value of the MSRs is amortized in proportion to and over the period of estimated net servicing revenue and recorded in noninterest expense as amortization of intangible assets. The carrying value of these assets is periodically reviewed for impairment using a lower of carrying value or fair value methodology. For purposes of measuring impairment, the servicing rights are stratified based on the underlying loan type and note rate and the carrying value for each stratum is compared to fair value based on a discounted cash flow analysis, utilizing current prepayment speeds and discount rates. Events that may significantly affect the estimates used are changes in interest rates and the related impact on mortgage loan prepayment speeds and the payment performance of the underlying loans. If the carrying value is greater than fair value, impairment is recognized through a valuation allowance for each impaired stratum and recorded as amortization of intangible assets. The reduction in the fair value of MSRs at September 30, 2004, to immediate 25 and 50 basis point adverse changes in interest rates would be approximately $115 million and $239 million, respectively. An upward movement in interest rates at September 30, 2004, of 25 and 50 basis points would increase the value of the MSRs by approximately $99 million and $172 million, respectively. Refer to Note 6 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding MSRs.
Goodwill and Other Intangibles The Company records all assets and liabilities acquired in purchase acquisitions, including goodwill and other intangibles, at fair value as required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. Goodwill and indefinite-lived assets are no longer amortized but are subject, at a minimum, to annual tests for impairment. Under certain situations, interim impairment tests may be required if events occur or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting segment below its carrying amount. Other intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives using straight-line and accelerated methods and are subject to impairment if events or circumstances indicate a possible inability to realize the carrying amount.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Under the supervision and with the participation of the Companys management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, the Company has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act)). Based upon this evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements" -->
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and, therefore, do not include all information and notes necessary for a complete presentation of financial position, results of operations and cash flow activity required in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. In the opinion of management of U.S. Bancorp (the Company), all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair statement of results for the interim periods have been made. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and notes included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003. Certain amounts in prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation.
Loan Commitments On March 9, 2004, the Securities and Exchange Commission Staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 105 (SAB 105), Application of Accounting Principles to Loan Commitments, which provides guidance regarding loan commitments accounted for as derivative instruments and is effective for commitments entered into after March 31, 2004. The guidance clarifies that expected future cash flows related to the servicing of the loan may be recognized only when the servicing asset has been contractually separated from the underlying loan by sale with servicing retained. The adoption of SAB 105 did not have a material impact on the Companys financial statements.
On December 31, 2003, the Company completed the distribution of all of the outstanding shares of common stock of Piper Jaffray Companies to its shareholders. This non-cash distribution was tax-free to the Company, its shareholders and Piper Jaffray Companies. In connection with the December 31, 2003, distribution, the results of Piper Jaffray Companies for 2003 are reported in the Companys Consolidated Statement of Income separately as discontinued operations.
The following table represents the condensed results of operations for discontinued operations for the third quarter and first nine months of 2003:
Following the distribution, the Companys wholly-owned subsidiary, USB Holdings, Inc. holds a $180 million subordinated debt facility with Piper Jaffray & Co., a broker-dealer subsidiary of Piper Jaffray Companies. In addition, the Company provides an indemnification in an amount up to $17.5 million with respect to certain specified liabilities primarily resulting from third-party claims relating to research analyst independence and from certain regulatory investigations, as defined in the separation and distribution agreement entered into with Piper
The detail of the amortized cost, gross unrealized holding gains and losses, and fair value of held-to-maturity and available-for-sale securities was as follows:
The fair value of available-for-sale securities shown above includes securities totaling $6.8 billion with unrealized losses of $173.0 million which have been in an unrealized loss position for greater than 12 months. All principal and interest payments on available-for-sale debt securities in an unrealized loss position for greater than 12 months are expected to be collected given the high credit quality of the U.S. government agency debt securities and bank holding company issuers and the Companys ability and intent to hold the securities until such time as the value recovers or maturity. All other available-for-sale securities with unrealized losses have an aggregate fair value of $14.0 billion and have been in an unrealized loss position for less than 12 months and represent both fixed-rate securities and floating-rate securities containing caps with temporary impairment resulting from increases in interest rates since the purchase of the securities.
The following table provides information as to the amount of gross gains and losses realized through the sales of available-for-sale investment securities:
For amortized cost, fair value and yield by maturity date of held-to-maturity and available-for-sale securities outstanding at September 30, 2004, refer to Table 5 included in Managements Discussion and Analysis which is incorporated by reference into these Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
The composition of the loan portfolio was as follows:
Loans are presented net of unearned interest and deferred fees and costs, which amounted to $1.4 billion and $1.5 billion at September 30, 2004, and December 31, 2003, respectively.
The Companys portfolio of residential mortgages serviced for others was $63.2 billion and $53.9 billion at September 30, 2004, and December 31, 2003, respectively.
The net carrying value of capitalized mortgage servicing rights was as follows:
Changes in capitalized mortgage servicing rights are summarized as follows:
The key economic assumptions used to estimate the value of the mortgage servicing rights portfolio were as follows:
The estimated sensitivity of the fair value of the mortgage servicing rights portfolio to changes in interest rates at September 30, 2004, was as follows:
The fair value of mortgage servicing rights and its sensitivity to changes in interest rates is influenced by the mix of the servicing portfolio and characteristics of each segment of the portfolio. In the current interest rate environment, mortgage loans originated as part of government agency and state loan programs tend to experience slower prepayment speeds and better cash flows than conventional mortgage loans. The Companys servicing portfolio consists of the distinct portfolios of Mortgage Revenue Bond Programs (MRBP), government-related mortgages and conventional mortgages. The MRBP division specializes in servicing loans made under state and local housing authority programs. These programs provide mortgages to low and moderate income borrowers and are generally under government insured programs with down payment or closing cost assistance. The conventional and government servicing portfolios are predominantly comprised of fixed-rate agency loans (FNMA, FHLMC, GNMA, FHLB and various housing agencies) with limited adjustable-rate or jumbo mortgage loans.
A summary of the Companys mortgage servicing rights and related characteristics by portfolio as of September 30, 2004, was as follows:
The following table reflects the changes in the carrying value of goodwill for the nine months ended September 30, 2004:
Intangible assets consisted of the following:
Aggregate amortization and impairment expense consisted of the following:
Below is the estimated amortization expense for the years ending:
The following table is a summary of the debt obligations relating to unconsolidated subsidiary trusts holding junior subordinated debentures of the Company as of September 30, 2004:
At September 30, 2004, and December 31, 2003, the Company had authority to issue 4 billion shares of common stock and 10 million shares of preferred stock. The Company had 1,870.8 million and 1,922.9 million shares of common stock outstanding at September 30, 2004, and December 31, 2003, respectively.
The components of earnings per share were:
For the three months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, options to purchase 29 million and 56 million shares, respectively, and 38 million and 92 million shares for the nine months ended 2004 and 2003, respectively, were outstanding but not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because they were antidilutive.
Retirement Plans The following table sets forth the components of net periodic benefit cost (income) for the retirement plans:
The information for the components of the net periodic benefit cost (income) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003, was not readily available.
The components of income tax expense were:
A reconciliation of expected income tax expense at the federal statutory rate of 35% to the Companys applicable income tax expense follows:
Included in the first quarter of 2004 was a reduction in income tax expense related to the resolution of federal income tax examinations covering substantially all of the Companys legal entities for the years 1995 through 1999. The resolution of these cycles was the result of a series of negotiations held between the Company and representatives of the Internal Revenue Service at both the examination and appellate levels. The resolution of these matters and the taxing authorities acceptance of submitted claims and tax return adjustments resulted in the reduction of estimated income tax liabilities.
COMMITMENTS TO EXTEND CREDIT
Commitments to extend credit are legally binding and generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses. The contractual amount represents the Companys exposure to credit loss, in the event of default by the borrower. The Company manages this credit risk by using the same credit policies it applies to loans. Collateral is obtained to secure commitments based on managements credit assessment of the borrower. The collateral may include marketable securities, receivables, inventory, equipment and real estate. Since the Company expects many of the commitments to expire without being drawn, total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent the Companys future liquidity requirements. In addition, the commitments include consumer credit lines that are cancelable upon notification to the consumer.
LETTERS OF CREDIT
Standby letters of credit are commitments the Company issues to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third-party. The guarantees frequently support public and private borrowing arrangements, including commercial paper issuances, bond financings and other similar transactions. The Company issues commercial letters of credit on behalf of customers to ensure payment or collection in connection with trade transactions. In the event of a customers nonperformance, the Companys credit loss exposure is the same as in any extension of credit, up to the letters contractual amount. Management assesses the borrowers credit to determine the necessary collateral, which may include marketable securities, receivables, inventory, equipment and real estate. Since the conditions requiring the Company to fund letters of credit may not occur, the Company expects its liquidity requirements to be less than the total outstanding commitments. The maximum potential future payments guaranteed by the Company under standby letter of credit arrangements at September 30, 2004, were approximately $10.3 billion with a weighted- average term of approximately 23 months. The estimated fair value of standby letters of credit was approximately $72.7 million at September 30, 2004.
GUARANTEES
Guarantees are contingent commitments issued by the Company to customers or other third-parties. The Companys guarantees primarily include parent guarantees related to subsidiaries third-party borrowing arrangements; third-party performance guarantees inherent in the Companys business operations such as indemnified securities lending programs and merchant charge-back guarantees; indemnification or buy-back provisions related to certain asset sales; and contingent consideration arrangements related to acquisitions. For certain guarantees, the Company has recorded a liability related to the potential obligation, or has access to collateral to support the guarantee or through the exercise of other recourse provisions can offset some or all of the maximum potential future payments made under these guarantees. The estimated fair value of guarantees, other than standby letters of credit, was approximately $133 million at September 30, 2004.
Third-Party Borrowing ArrangementsThe Company provides guarantees to third-parties as a part of certain subsidiaries borrowing arrangements, primarily representing guaranteed operating or capital lease payments or other debt obligations with maturity dates extending through 2007. The maximum potential future payments guaranteed by the Company under these arrangements were approximately $1.4 billion at September 30, 2004. The Companys recorded liabilities as of September 30, 2004, included $33.0 million representing outstanding amounts owed to these third-parties and required to be recorded on the Companys balance sheet in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
Commitments from Securities LendingThe Company participates in securities lending activities by acting as the customers agent involving the loan or sale of securities. The Company indemnifies customers for the difference between the market value of the securities lent and the market value of the collateral received. Cash collateralizes these transactions. The maximum potential future payments guaranteed by the Company under these arrangements were approximately $17.3 billion at September 30, 2004, and represented the market value of the securities lent to third-parties. At September 30, 2004, the Company held assets with a market value of $17.9 billion as collateral for these arrangements.
Asset Sales The Company has provided guarantees to certain third-parties in connection with the sale of certain assets, primarily loan portfolios and low-income housing tax credits. These guarantees are generally in the form of asset buy-back or make-whole provisions that are triggered upon a credit event or a change in the tax-qualifying status of the related projects, as applicable, and remain in effect until the loans are collected or final tax credits are realized, respectively. The maximum potential future payments guaranteed by the Company under these arrangements were approximately $554.4 million at September 30, 2004, and represented the total proceeds received from the buyer in these transactions where the buy-back or make-whole provisions have not yet expired. Recourse available to the Company includes guarantees from the Small Business Administration (for SBA loans sold), recourse against the correspondent that originated the loan or to the private mortgage issuer, the right to collect payments from the debtors, and/or the right to liquidate the underlying collateral, if any, and retain the proceeds. Based on its established loan-to-value guidelines, the Company believes the recourse available is sufficient to recover future payments, if any, under the loan buy-back guarantees.
Merchant ProcessingThe Company, through its subsidiaries NOVA Information Systems, Inc. and NOVA European Holdings Company, provides merchant processing services. Under the rules of credit card associations, a merchant processor retains a contingent liability for credit card transactions processed. This contingent liability arises in the event of a billing dispute between the merchant and a cardholder that is ultimately resolved in the cardholders favor. In this situation, the transaction is charged back to the merchant and the disputed amount is credited or otherwise refunded to the cardholder. If the Company is unable to collect this amount from the merchant, it bears the loss for the amount of the refund paid to the cardholder.
Other Guarantees The Company provides liquidity and credit enhancement facilities to a Company-sponsored conduit, as more fully described in the Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements section within Managements Discussion and Analysis. Although management believes a draw against these facilities is remote, the maximum potential future payments guaranteed by the Company under these arrangements were approximately $6.1 billion at September 30, 2004. The recorded fair value of the Companys liability for the credit enhancement recourse obligation and liquidity facilities was $35.3 million at September 30, 2004, and was included in other liabilities.
OTHER CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
In connection with the spin-off of Piper Jaffray Companies, the Company has agreed to indemnify Piper Jaffray Companies against losses that may result from third-party claims relating to certain specified matters. The Companys indemnification obligation related to these specified matters is capped at $17.5 million and can be terminated by the Company if there is a change in control event for Piper Jaffray Companies. Through
Consolidated Statement of Cash FlowsListed below are supplemental disclosures to the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows:
Money Market InvestmentsMoney market investments are included with cash and due from banks as part of cash and cash equivalents. Money market investments consisted of the following:
Part II -- Other Information" -->
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds Refer to the Capital Management section within Managements Discussion and Analysis in Part I for information regarding shares repurchased by the Company during the third quarter of 2004.
Item 6. Exhibits
SIGNATURE
EXHIBIT 12
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
I, Jerry A. Grundhofer, Chief Executive Officer of U.S. Bancorp, a Delaware corporation, certify that:
Dated: November 9, 2004
EXHIBIT 31.2
I, David M. Moffett, Chief Financial Officer of U.S. Bancorp, a Delaware corporation, certify that:
EXHIBIT 32
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of U.S. Bancorp, a Delaware corporation (the Company), do hereby certify that:
Executive Offices
U.S. Bancorp
Common Stock Transfer Agent and Registrar
Mellon Investor Services
For Registered or Certified Mail:
Telephone representatives are available weekdays from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Central Time, and automated support is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Specific information about your account is available on Mellons Internet site by clicking on the Investor ServiceDirectSM link.
Independent Auditors
Common Stock Listing and Trading
Dividends and Reinvestment Plan
Investment Community Contacts
Judith T. Murphy
Financial Information
Web site. For information about U.S. Bancorp, including news, financial results, annual reports and other documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, access our home page on the Internet at usbank.com and click on Investor/Shareholder Information.
Mail. At your request, we will mail to you our quarterly earnings news releases, quarterly financial data reported on Form 10-Q and additional copies of our annual reports. Please contact:
U.S. Bancorp Investor Relations
Media Requests
Privacy
U.S. Bancorp is committed to respecting the privacy of our customers and safeguarding the financial and personal information provided to us. To learn more about the U.S. Bancorp commitment to protecting privacy, visit usbank.com and click on Privacy Pledge.
Code of Ethics
U.S. Bancorp places the highest importance on honesty and integrity. Each year, every U.S. Bancorp employee certifies compliance with the letter and spirit of our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct, the guiding ethical standards of our organization. For details about our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct, visit usbank.com and click on About U.S. Bancorp, then Ethics at U.S. Bank.
Diversity
U.S. Bancorp and our subsidiaries are committed to developing and maintaining a workplace that reflects the diversity of the communities we serve. We support a work environment where individual differences are valued and respected and where each individual who shares the fundamental values of the company has an opportunity to contribute and grow based on individual merit.
Equal Employment Opportunity/Affirmative Action
U.S. Bancorp and our subsidiaries are committed to providing Equal Employment Opportunity to all employees and applicants for employment. In keeping with this commitment, employment decisions are made based upon performance, skills and abilities, rather than race, color, religion, national origin or ancestry, gender, age, disability, veteran status, sexual orientation or any other factors protected by law. The corporation complies with municipal, state and federal fair employment laws, including regulations applying to federal contractors.
U.S. Bancorp, including each of our subsidiaries, is an Equal Opportunity Employer committed to creating a diverse workforce.
This report has been produced on recycled paper.