CubeSmart - 10-Q quarterly report FY

 

(Mark one)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one).

Large accelerated filer þ    Accelerated filer o    Non-accelerated filer o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as determined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.) Yes o No þ

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:

Note the financial statements covered in this report contain the results of operations and financial condition of U-Store-It Trust (“we”, “us”, “our” or the “Company”) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005.

     This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, together with other statements and information publicly disseminated by the Company, contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Such statements are based on assumptions and expectations that may not be realized and are inherently subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which cannot be predicted with accuracy and some of which might not even be anticipated. Although we believe the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, future events and actual results, performance, transactions or achievements, financial and otherwise, may differ materially from the results, performance, transactions or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Risks, uncertainties and other factors that might cause such differences, some of which could be material, include, but are not limited to:

We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise these forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise except as may be required in securities laws.

1. ORGANIZATION

     U-Store-It Trust (“we” or the “Company”) was formed in July 2004 to succeed the self-storage operations owned directly and indirectly by Robert J. Amsdell, Barry L. Amsdell, Todd C. Amsdell and their affiliated entities and related family trusts (the “Amsdell Entities” or the “Predecessor”). The Company commenced operations on October 21, 2004, after completing the mergers of Amsdell Partners, Inc. and High Tide LLC with and into the Company. The Company subsequently completed an initial public offering (“IPO”) of its common shares on October 27, 2004 concurrently with the consummation of various formation transactions. The IPO consisted of the sale of an aggregate of 28,750,000 common shares. In October 2005, the Company completed a follow on public offering, pursuant to which it sold an aggregate of 19,665,000 common shares. The Company owns approximately 92% of the aggregate partnership interests in U-Store-It, L.P. (the “Operating Partnership”) at September 30, 2006. The Company is a real estate company engaged in the business of owning, acquiring, developing and operating self-storage properties for business and personal use under month-to-month leases and is operated as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”), for federal income tax purposes. All of the Company’s assets are held by, and operations are conducted through, the operating partnership and its subsidiaries. Through the operating partnership, the Company owns and manages 399 and 339 storage facilities as of September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively.

     Basis of Presentation — The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by the Company pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) regarding interim financial reporting and, in the opinion of management, include all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). Accordingly, readers of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should refer to the Company’s audited financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP, and the related notes thereto, for the year ended December 31, 2005, which are included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 (Commission File No. 001-32324), as certain footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted from this report pursuant to the rules of the SEC. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations to be expected for any future period or the full year.

     Reclassifications – Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation.

     The following summarizes the real estate assets of the Company as of:

     The following table summarizes the acquisitions the Company completed during the three months ended September 30, 2006:

     The above acquisitions are included in the Company’s results of operations from the date of acquisition.

     In February 2006, the Company and the operating partnership entered into a new three-year $250.0 million revolving credit facility, replacing the Company’s existing $150.0 million facility, which had no outstanding balance as of December 31, 2005. The revolving credit agreement is scheduled to terminate in February 2009 with a one-year extension option. As of September 30, 2006, the outstanding balance on the facility was $170.5 million. The terms of the new agreement allow the Company to increase the credit limit up to $350.0 million if necessary, at a later date. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company is required to satisfy certain financial coverage ratios and operating covenants, including a maximum leverage ratio and interest coverage ratio, all of which the Company was in compliance with as of September 30, 2006. Borrowings under the new facility bear interest, at the Company’s option, at either an alternative base rate or a Eurodollar rate, in each case plus an applicable margin. The alternative base interest rate is a fluctuating rate equal to the higher of the prime rate or the sum of the federal funds effective rate plus 50 basis points. The applicable margin for the alternative base rate will vary from 0.15% to 0.60% depending on the Company’s leverage ratio. The Eurodollar rate is a periodic fixed rate equal to LIBOR. The applicable margin for the Eurodollar rate will vary from 1.15% to 1.60% based on the Company’s leverage ratio. The facility’s interest rate was 6.63% at September 30, 2006, which consisted of LIBOR at a rate of 5.33% with a spread of 1.30% . The credit facility requires a commitment fee based on the unused portion of the credit facility, which was 0.25% at September 30, 2006. The credit facility is unsecured; however, it requires that the Company maintain a minimum “borrowing base” of properties. As of September 30, 2006, the Company had availability of approximately $79.5 million under this revolving credit facility.

     In July 2006, YSI VII LLC (“YSI VII”), an indirect subsidiary of the Company, assumed a $3.4 million fixed rate mortgage loan in connection with the acquisition of the Jernigan Portfolio, Bank of America as the lender, which requires monthly debt service payments until June 2013. The mortgage loan, which is secured by one of the Company’s self-storage facilities, bears interest at 5.50% and matures in June 2013. Since the debt was assumed at below market rates, the assumed debt was adjusted as part of the purchase price allocation to fair value of approximately $3.2 million at an effective interest rate of 6.50%. This mortgage loan requires YSI VII to establish reserves relating to the mortgaged facilities for replacements, repairs, real estate taxes and insurance. The operating partnership is a guarantor under this mortgage loan with respect to certain exceptions to the non-recourse provisions of the loan.

     In July 2006, YSI VIII LLC (“YSI VIII”), an indirect subsidiary of the Company, assumed a $1.9 million fixed rate mortgage loan with Bank of America as the lender in connection with the acquisition of the Jernigan Portfolio, which requires monthly debt service payments until June 2013. The mortgage loan, which is secured by one of the Company’s self-storage facilities, bears interest at 5.50% and matures in June 2013. Since the debt was assumed at below market rates, the assumed debt was adjusted as part of the purchase price allocation to fair value of approximately $1.8 million at an effective interest rate of 6.50%. This mortgage loan requires YSI VIII to establish reserves relating to the mortgaged facilities for replacements, repairs, real estate taxes and insurance. The operating partnership is a guarantor under this mortgage loan with respect to certain exceptions to the non-recourse provisions of the loan.

     In July 2006, YSI IX LLC (“YSI IX”), an indirect subsidiary of the Company, assumed a $2.1 million fixed rate mortgage loan with Bank of America as the lender in connection with the acquisition of the Jernigan Portfolio, which requires monthly debt service payments until June 2013. The mortgage loan, which is secured by one of the Company’s self-storage facilities, bears interest at 5.50% and matures in June 2013. Since the debt was assumed at below market rates, the assumed debt was adjusted as part of the purchase price allocation to fair value of approximately $2.0 million at an effective interest rate of 6.50%. This mortgage loan requires YSI IX to establish reserves relating to the mortgaged facilities for replacements, repairs, real estate taxes and insurance. The operating partnership is a guarantor under this mortgage loan with respect to certain exceptions to the non-recourse provisions of the loan.

     In August 2006, YSI XV LLC (“YSI XV”), an indirect subsidiary of the Company, assumed a $2.0 million fixed rate mortgage loan with Wachovia as the lender in connection with the acquisition of U-Stor, which requires monthly debt service payments until January 2015. The mortgage loan, which is secured by one of the Company’s self-storage facilities, bears interest at 5.60% and matures in January 2015. Since the debt was assumed at below market rates, the assumed debt was adjusted as part of the purchase price allocation to fair value of approximately $1.9 million at an effective interest rate of 6.41%. This mortgage loan requires YSI XV to establish reserves relating to the mortgaged facilities for replacements, repairs, real estate taxes and insurance. The operating partnership is a guarantor under this mortgage loan with respect to certain exceptions to the non-recourse provisions of the loan.

     In August 2006, YSI XVII LLC (“YSI XVII”), an indirect subsidiary of the Company, assumed a $4.6 million fixed rate mortgage loan with GEMSA as the lender in connection with the acquisition of In and Out, which requires monthly debt service payments until June 2013. The mortgage loan, which is secured by one of the Company’s self-storage facilities, bears interest at 5.72% and matures in June 2013. Since the debt was assumed at below market rates, the assumed debt was adjusted as part of the purchase price allocation to fair value of approximately $4.5 million at an effective interest rate of 6.32%. This mortgage loan requires YSI XVII to establish reserves relating to the mortgaged facilities for replacements, repairs, real estate taxes and insurance. The operating partnership is a guarantor under this mortgage loan with respect to certain exceptions to the non-recourse provisions of the loan.

     The Company’s mortgage loans and notes are summarized as follows:

     As of September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, the Company’s mortgage loans payable were collateralized by certain of its self-storage facilities with net book values of approximately $959 million and $910 million, respectively.

     The following table represents the future principal payment requirements on the outstanding mortgage loans at September 30, 2006:

     Minority interests relate to the interests in the operating partnership that are not owned by the Company, which, at September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, amounted to approximately 8%.

     In conjunction with the formation of the Company, certain former owners contributed properties to the operating partnership and received units in the operating partnership concurrently with the closing of the IPO. Limited partners who acquired units in the various formation transactions have the right, that began on October 27, 2005, to require the operating partnership to redeem part or all of their operating partnership units for cash or, at the Company’s option, common shares, based upon the fair market value of an equivalent number of common shares for which the operating partnership units would have been redeemed if the Company had assumed and satisfied the operating partnership’s obligation by paying common shares. The market value of the Company’s common shares for this purpose will be equal to the average of the closing trading price of the Company’s common shares on the New York Stock Exchange for the ten trading days before the day on which the Company received the redemption notice. Upon consummation of the IPO, the carrying value of the net assets of the operating partnership was allocated to minority interests. Pursuant to three contribution agreements and three option exercises in 2005, entities owned by the Company’s Chairman and one of its trustees received an aggregate of 1,524,358 operating partnership units for six properties with a net historical basis of $7.3 million.

     In conjunction with the July 2005 acquisition of 71 self-storage facilities from National Self Storage and the Schomac Group, Inc., the Company paid approximately $214.5 million which included $69.7 million in cash, assumed $83.0 million of indebtedness and issued 3,674,497 operating partnership units valued at $61.8 million. As provided in the partnership agreement of the operating partnership, these units are redeemable by unitholders for cash or, at the Company’s option, common shares on a one-for-one basis. During the second quarter the Company received a redemption notice from certain unitholders. The Company intends to register these shares during the remainder of 2006 or in the first quarter of 2007.

     Acquisition of Facilities

     In connection with the IPO, the Company entered into an option agreement with Rising Tide Development, a company owned and controlled by Robert J. Amsdell, the Company’s Chairman, and Barry L. Amsdell, one of its trustees, to acquire 18 self-storage facilities, consisting, as of September 30, 2006, of 14 facilities owned by Rising Tide Development, one facility which Rising Tide Development has the right to acquire from unaffiliated third parties and three facilities which have since been acquired by the Company pursuant to the exercise of its options. The options become exercisable with respect to each particular self-storage facility if and when that facility achieves a month-end occupancy level of 85% for three consecutive months. None of the remaining self-storage facilities that the Company has the option to purchase met the occupancy requirement as of September 30, 2006.

     The Company acquired nine self-storage facilities from Jernigan Property Group on July 27, 2006 for consideration of approximately $45.3 million. Our President and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Jernigan, serves as President of Jernigan Property Group and has a 20% beneficial interest in eleven self-storage properties partially owned by Jernigan Property Group and related companies and partnerships. Mr. Jernigan has agreed that he will not expand his interest, ownership or activity in the self-storage business beyond these eleven facilities. In accordance with the contract signed April 3, 2006 our operating partnership entered into an agreement to acquire nine of these self-storage facilities. Given Mr. Jernigan’s appointment as a trustee and the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company on April 24, 2006, this transaction was subject to review and final approval by a majority of the independent members of the Company’s Board of Trustees. Mr. Jernigan has discontinued all involvement in the day-to-day management or operation of the Jernigan Property Group facilities.

     Effective October 27, 2004, YSI Management LLC, one of our wholly owned subsidiaries, entered into a management contract with Rising Tide Development to provide property management services to the option facilities for a fee equal to the greater of 5.35% of the gross revenues of each facility or $1,500 per facility per month. Management fees earned by YSI Management LLC, from Rising Tide Development, were approximately $0.1 million and $0.3 million, respectively, for each of the three months and nine months, ended September 30, 2006 and 2005. Accounts receivable from Rising Tide Development at September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, were approximately $0.3 million and $0.4 million, respectively, and is included in “Due From Related Parties”. This receivable represents expenses paid on behalf of Rising Tide Development by YSI Management LLC that will be reimbursed under standard business terms. Additionally, U-Store-It Mini Warehouse Co., another of the Company’s wholly owned subsidiaries, entered into a marketing and ancillary services contract with Rising Tide Development to provide marketing and various additional services to the option facilities. In return for these services, U-Store-It Mini Warehouse Co. retains all the profits from these services. Fees earned from this management contract were approximately $0.1 million for each of the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 respectively, and $0.3 million and $0.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

     In 2004, our Predecessor engaged Amsdell Construction, a company owned 50% by Robert J. Amsdell and 50% by Barry L. Amsdell, to rebuild a South Carolina facility destroyed by fire in 2004 and to complete a build out under one of our office leases. The total payments incurred by the Company to Amsdell Construction for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, respectively was approximately $10,875 and $41,764, respectively. Total payments incurred for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005, were $0.0 million and $0.3 million, respectively.

     Corporate Office Leases

     The Company and its operating partnership has entered into a number of leases with Amsdell and Amsdell, an entity owned by Robert J. Amsdell and Barry L. Amsdell, for office space of approximately 35,000 square feet at office buildings in Cleveland, Ohio. These leases range in term from those expiring in April 2007 to long-term leases expiring in December 2014 with various extension options at the then prevailing market rates. The Company’s disinterested trustees approved the terms of, and entry into, these leases by the operating partnership.

     The total amount of lease payments incurred under these office leases for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 was approximately $0.2 million, and $0.4 million, respectively. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005, lease payments incurred were $0.1 million and $0.3 million, respectively.

     Total future minimum rental payments under the related party lease agreements entered into as of September 30, 2006 are as follows:

     The Company bills Amsdell and Amsdell for the cost of certain services. As of September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, the Company recorded a receivable of $3,961 and $10,172, respectively.

     Aircraft Lease

     The Company chartered an aircraft from Aqua Sun Investments, L.L.C. (“Aqua Sun”), a company owned by Robert J. Amsdell and Barry L. Amsdell. The Company was under contract pursuant to a timesharing agreement to reimburse Aqua Sun at the rate of $1,250 for each hour of use of the aircraft and the payment of certain expenses associated with the use of the aircraft. As described in the paragraph below, effective June 30, 2005 the timesharing agreement was terminated by mutual agreement of the parties thereto and was replaced on July 1, 2005 with a non-exclusive aircraft lease agreement with Aqua Sun (the “Aircraft Lease”). The Company’s disinterested trustees approved the terms of, and the entry into, the non-exclusive aircraft lease agreement by the operating partnership.

     Under the Aircraft Lease with Aqua Sun, the operating partnership leased for corporate use from time to time an airplane owned by Aqua Sun. Under the terms of the Aircraft Lease, the operating partnership leased use of the airplane owned by Aqua Sun at an hourly rate of $1,450 per flight hour. Aqua Sun was responsible for various costs associated with operation of the airplane, including insurance, storage and maintenance and repair, but the operating partnership is responsible for fuel costs and the costs of pilots and other cabin personnel required for its use of the airplane. The Aircraft Lease, which was effective as of July 1, 2005, had a one-year term and was terminated at June 30, 2006. The total amount incurred for such aircraft charters described above by the Company for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 was approximately $0.0 million and $0.1 million, respectively, and for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 was $0.1 million and $0.3 million, respectively.

     Other

     The Company engaged Dunlevy Building Systems Inc., a company owned by John Dunlevy, a brother-in-law of Robert J. Amsdell and Barry L. Amsdell, for construction, zoning consultant and general contractor services at certain of its self-storage facilities. The total payments were incurred by the Company to Dunlevy Building Systems Inc. for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 were approximately $0 and $17,000, respectively, and for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 were $19,028 and $22,000, respectively.

     The Company engaged Deborah Dunlevy Designs, a company owned by Deborah Dunlevy, a sister of Robert J. Amsdell and Barry L. Amsdell, for interior design services at certain of its self-storage facilities and offices. The total payments incurred by the Company to Deborah Dunlevy Designs for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2005 were approximately $0 and $56,000, respectively. There were no payments made during the nine months ended September 30, 2006.

     Registration Rights

     The Amsdell Entities that acquired common shares or operating partnership units in the formation transactions which took place at the time of the IPO received certain registration rights. An aggregate of approximately 9.7 million common shares acquired in the formation transactions are subject to a registration rights agreement (including approximately 1.1 million shares issuable upon redemption of approximately 1.1 million operating partnership units issued in the formation transactions). The Amsdell Entities are entitled to require the Company to register their shares for public sale subject to certain exceptions, limitations and conditions precedent.

     In addition, Rising Tide Development received registration rights with respect to the operating partnership units it received in connection with the Company’s acquisition of three option facilities. Rising Tide Development is entitled to require the Company to register approximately 0.4 million common shares (which shares are issuable upon redemption of approximately 0.4 million operating partnership units issued in connection with the Company’s option exercises) for public sale subject to certain exceptions, limitations and conditions precedent.

     The Company intends to register the aforementioned shares during the remainder of 2006 or the first quarter of 2007. Additionally, certain operating partnership units issued in conjunction with the acquisition of self-storage facilities from National Self Storage will be exchanged for shares in accordance with its purchase agreement.

     During the nine months ended September 30, 2006, the Company acquired 60 self-storage facilities for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $363.2 million. The unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma financial information set forth below reflects adjustments to the Company’s historical financial data to give effect as if the acquisitions and related assumed indebtedness each had occurred on January 1, 2005.

     The unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma information presented below does not purport to represent what the Company’s actual results of operations would have been for the periods indicated, nor does it purport to represent the Company’s future results of operations.

     The following table summarizes, on a pro forma basis, our consolidated results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 based on the assumptions described above:

     In September 2006, SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 108, “Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements.” SAB 108 provides guidance on the consideration of effects of the prior year misstatements in quantifying current year misstatements for the purpose of a materiality assessment. The SEC staff believes registrants must quantify errors using both a balance sheet and income statement approach and evaluate whether either approach results in quantifying a misstatement that, when all relevant quantitative and qualitative factors are considered, is material. Adjustments made under this pronouncement are reflected in the opening balance of shareholders’ equity in the year of adoption. SAB 108 also requires the adjustment of any prior quarterly financial statements within the fiscal year of adoption for the effects of such errors on the quarters when the information is next presented. Such adjustments do not require previously filed reports with the SEC to be amended. The SAB allows for the adjustment to be made through a cumulative effect transition. SAB 108 is effective for the first annual period ending after November 15, 2006 with early application encouraged.

     Effective September 30, 2006 the Company early adopted SAB 108. Upon the Company assessing the impact of SAB 108 on its condensed consolidated financial statements, the Company determined that an immaterial error corrected in the second quarter of 2006 related to rental income and errors related to loan procurement costs and workers compensation expense which were deemed to be immaterial individually and in the aggregate under the Company’s previous error assessment methodology, were material under the provisions of SAB 108. In accordance with SAB 108, the Company has adjusted its opening accumulated deficit for fiscal 2006 and its financial results for the first two quarters of fiscal 2006 (included in the nine months ended September 30, 2006 in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements) for the items described below.

     Loan Procurement Costs

     The Company adjusted its opening accumulated deficit for 2006 and its financial results for the first two quarters of 2006 to reflect a change in amortization period of certain loan procurement costs, associated with debt instruments with increasing interest rates that originated in 2000 and 2001. The loan procurement costs were being amortized over a period inconsistent with the determination of the debt instruments’ interest cost.

     Rental Income

     The Company adjusted its opening accumulated deficit for 2006 and its financial results for the first two quarters of 2006 for adjustments to certain tenant receivable transactions. During the second quarter 2006, the Company identified an immaterial accounting error related to certain tenant receivable transactions. The misstatement related to the period in which the revenue related to certain tenants had been recognized and it originated in 2005.

     In October 2006, the Company repaid its 7.13% mortgage, for USI II a wholly-owned subsidiary, that had total principal outstanding of approximately $38.5 million. The debt was paid from proceeds obtained by drawing on the Company’s existing revolving credit facility.

     In November 2006, the Company entered into a 30-day, unsecured $50.0 million bridge loan agreement with Wachovia Bank, National Association as the lender. The term loan bears interest at a variable rate of LIBOR plus 115 basis points. The proceeds of the $50.0 million bridge loan combined with borrowings under the Company’s revolving credit facility were used to repay its 8.16% mortgage, for Acquiport III a wholly-owned subsidiary, that had total principal outstanding of approximately $64.1 million in November 2006.

     The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this report. The Company makes certain statements in this section that are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. For a complete discussion of forward-looking statements, see the section in this report entitled “Forward-Looking Statements.” Certain risk factors may cause actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by the following discussion. For a discussion of such risk factors, see the section entitled “Risk Factors” in Item 1 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.

     The Company is an integrated self-storage real estate company, which means that it has in-house capabilities in the operation, design, development, leasing, and acquisition of self-storage facilities. At September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, the Company owned 399 and 339 self-storage facilities and related assets, respectively, totaling approximately 25.4 million and 20.8 million rentable square feet, respectively.

     On October 27, 2004, the Company completed its IPO, pursuant to which it sold an aggregate of 28,750,000 common shares. On October 7, 2005, the Company completed a follow on public offering, pursuant to which it sold an aggregate of 19,665,000 common shares.

     The Company derives revenues principally from rents received from its customers who rent units at its self-storage facilities under month-to-month leases. Therefore, our operating results depend materially on our ability to retain our existing customers and lease our available self-storage units to new customers while maintaining and, where possible, increasing our pricing levels. In addition, our operating results depend on the ability of our customers to make required rental payments to us. We believe that our decentralized approach to the management and operation of our facilities, which places an emphasis on local, market level oversight and control, allows us to respond quickly and effectively to changes in local market conditions, including increasing rents while maintaining occupancy levels, or increasing occupancy levels while maintaining pricing levels.

     The Company experiences minor seasonal fluctuations in the occupancy levels of our facilities, which are generally slightly higher during the summer months due to increased moving activity.

     The Company intends to focus on increasing our internal growth and selectively pursuing targeted acquisitions and developments of self-storage facilities. We intend to incur additional debt in connection with any such future acquisitions or developments.

     The Company has one reportable operating segment: we own, operate, develop, and acquire self-storage facilities. The Company’s self-storage facilities are located in major metropolitan areas and have numerous tenants per facility. All our operations are within the United States and no single tenant represents 1% or more of our revenues. The facilities in Florida, California, Illinois, New Jersey and Texas provided approximately 19.9%, 15.9%, 7.1%, 6.4% and 6.4%, respectively, of total revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2006.

     Set forth below is a summary of the accounting policies that management believes are critical to the preparation of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements. These policies have not changed since the Company filed its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 with the SEC. Certain of the accounting policies used in the preparation of these condensed consolidated financial statements are particularly important for an understanding of the financial position and results of operations presented in the historical condensed consolidated financial statements included in this report. These policies require the application of judgment and assumptions by management and, as a result, are subject to a degree of uncertainty. Due to this uncertainty, actual results could differ from estimates calculated and utilized by management.

     Basis of Presentation

     The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include all of the accounts of the Company, the operating partnership and the wholly owned subsidiaries of the operating partnership. The mergers of Amsdell Partners, Inc. and High Tide LLC with and into the Company, and the property interests contributed to the operating partnership by the Predecessor, have been accounted for as a reorganization of entities under common control and accordingly, were recorded at the Predecessor’s historical cost basis.

     For analytical presentation, all percentages are calculated using the numbers presented in the financial statements contained in Item 1 of this Form 10-Q.

     Self-Storage Facilities

     The Company records self-storage facilities at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation on the buildings and equipment is recorded on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives, which range from five to 39 years. Expenditures for significant renovations or improvements that extend the useful life of assets are capitalized. Repairs and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred.

     When facilities are acquired, the purchase price is allocated to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on estimated fair values. When a portfolio of facilities is acquired, the purchase price is allocated to the individual facilities based upon an income approach or a cash flow analysis using appropriate risk adjusted capitalization rates, which take into account the relative size, age and location of the individual facility along with current and projected occupancy and rental rate levels or appraised values, if available. Allocations to the individual assets and liabilities are based upon comparable market sales information for land, buildings and improvements and estimates of depreciated replacement cost of equipment.

     In allocating the purchase price, the Company determines whether the acquisition includes intangible assets or liabilities. Substantially all of the leases in place at acquired properties are at market rates, as the majority of the leases are month-to-month contracts. Accordingly, to date no portion of the purchase price has been allocated to above- or below-market lease intangibles. The Company also considers whether the in-place, at-market leases for any facility represent an intangible asset. Based upon the Company’s experience, leases of this nature generally re-let in less than 30 days and lease-up costs are minimal. Accordingly, the Company has no intangible assets recorded for in-place, at-market leases as of September 30, 2006. Additionally, to date no intangible asset has been recorded for the value of tenant relationships, because the Company does not have any concentrations of significant tenants and the average tenant turnover is fairly frequent.

     Long-lived assets classified as “held for use” are reviewed for impairment when events and circumstances indicate that there may be an impairment. The carrying values of these long-lived assets are compared to the undiscounted future cash flows attributable to the assets. An impairment loss is recorded if the net carrying value of the asset exceeds the fair value based on its undiscounted future cash flows attributable to the asset and circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the real estate asset may not be recoverable. The impairment loss recognized equals the excess of net carrying value over the related fair value of the asset.

     The Company considers long-lived assets to be “held for sale” upon satisfaction of the following criteria: (a) management commits to a plan to sell a facility (or group of facilities), (b) the facility is available for immediate sale in its present condition subject only to terms that are usual and customary for sales of such facilities, (c) an active program to locate a buyer and other actions required to complete the plan to sell the facility have been initiated, (d) the sale of the facility is probable and transfer of the asset is expected to be completed within one year, (e) the facility is being actively marketed for sale at a price that is reasonable in relation to its current fair value and (f) actions required to complete the plan indicate that it is unlikely that significant changes to the plan will be made or that the plan will be withdrawn.

     Typically these criteria are all met when the relevant asset is under contract, significant non-refundable deposits have been made by the potential buyer, the assets are immediately available for transfer and there are no contingencies related to the sale that may prevent the transaction from closing. In most transactions, these contingencies are not satisfied until the actual closing of the transaction; and, accordingly, the facility is not identified as held for sale until the closing actually occurs. However, each potential transaction is evaluated based on its separate facts and circumstances.

     Revenue Recognition

     Management has determined that all of the Company’s leases with tenants are operating leases. Rental income is recognized in accordance with the terms of the lease agreements or contracts, which generally are month-to-month. Revenues from long-term operating leases are recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. The excess of rents recognized over amounts contractually due pursuant to the underlying leases is included in deferred revenue, and contractually due but unpaid rents are included in other assets.

     Share Based Compensation

     We apply the fair value method of accounting for contingently issued shares and share options issued under our incentive award plan. Accordingly, share compensation expense is recorded ratably over the vesting period relating to such contingently issued shares and options. The Company has recognized compensation expense on a straight-line method over the requisite service period. Additionally, certain restricted share units awarded in 2005 to our chairman vest immediately upon his retirement from the Company as he has reached the retirement age set forth in his award agreement. Accordingly, share compensation expense related to this issuance was expensed fully at the grant date. Compensation expense recorded for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 was approximately $0.6 million and $1.0 million, respectively. Compensation expense recorded during the prior year was $0.2 million and $0.6 million for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2005, respectively.

     Recent Accounting Pronouncements

     In September 2006, SEC issued SAB No. 108, “Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements.” SAB 108 provides guidance on the consideration of effects of the prior year misstatements in quantifying current year misstatements for the purpose of a materiality assessment. The SEC staff believes registrants must quantify errors using both a balance sheet and income statement approach and evaluate whether either approach results in quantifying a misstatement that, when all relevant quantitative and qualitative factors are considered, is material. Adjustments made under this pronouncement are reflected on the opening balance sheet of shareholders’ equity in the year of adoption. SAB 108 also requires the adjustment of any prior quarterly financial statements within the fiscal year of adoption for the effects of such errors on the quarters when the information is next presented. Such adjustments do not require previously filed reports with the SEC to be amended. The SAB allows for the adjustment to be made through a cumulative effect transition. SAB 108 is effective for the first annual period ending after November 15, 2006 with early application encouraged.

     Effective September 30, 2006 the Company early adopted SAB 108. Upon the Company assessing the impact of SAB 108 on its condensed consolidated financial statements, the Company determined that an immaterial error corrected in the second quarter of 2006 related to rental income and errors related to loan procurement costs and workers compensation expense which were deemed to be immaterial individually and in the aggregate under the Company’s previous error assessment methodology, were material under the provisions of SAB 108. In accordance with SAB 108, the Company has adjusted its opening accumulated deficit for fiscal 2006 and its financial results for the first two quarters of fiscal 2006 (included in the nine months ended September 30, 2006 in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements).

     Impact of Adjustments

     The impact of each of the items noted above on fiscal 2006 opening shareholders’ equity and accumulated deficit and on net loss for the first and second quarters of fiscal 2006 is presented below (dollars in thousands):

     In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements.” SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This Statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2007. The Company is in the process of determining the impact of this Statement on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

     In July 2006, the FASB issued FIN 48, which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in tax positions. This Interpretation requires that we recognize in our financial statements, the impact of a tax position, if that position is more likely than not of being sustained on audit, based on the technical merits of the position. The provisions of FIN 48 are effective as of the beginning of our 2007 fiscal year, with the cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle recorded as an adjustment to opening accumulated deficit. We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting FIN 48 on our financial statements.

     The following discussion of the results of operations should be read in conjunction with the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes thereto. Historical results set forth in the condensed consolidated statements of operations reflect only the existing facilities and should not be taken as indicative of future operations.

     Acquisition and Development Activities

     The comparability of the Company’s results of operations is significantly affected by development, redevelopment and acquisition activities in 2006 and 2005. At September 30, 2006 and September 30, 2005, the Company owned interests in 399 and 236 self-storage facilities and related assets, respectively.

     The following table summarizes the acquisitions that the Company completed during the three months ended September 30, 2006:

     The above acquisitions are included in the Company’s results of operations from and after the date of acquisition.

          A comparison of income (loss) before minority interests for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 is as follows:

     Comparison of Operating Results for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2006 and 2005

     Total Revenues

          Rental income increased from $38.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2005 to $52.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006, an increase of $14.0 million, or 36.3%. This increase is primarily attributable to (i) the acquisition of 19 facilities in the last three months of 2005 and 60 facilities in the first nine months of 2006 and (ii) an increase in revenues from our pool of “same-store” facilities of approximately $1.1 million (see “Same-Store Facility Results” below). Additionally, the Company recorded approximately $0.2 million of revenue from business interruption insurance settlements received during the three months ended September 30, 2006.

          Other property related income increased from $2.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2005 to $3.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006, an increase of $1.1 million, or 40.2%. This increase is primarily attributable to the acquisition of 19 facilities in the last three months of 2005 and 60 facilities during the first nine months of 2006.

     Total Operating Expenses

          Property operating expenses increased from $14.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2005 to $22.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006, an increase of $7.3 million, or 50.0%. This increase is primarily attributable to (i) the acquisition of 19 facilities in the last three months of 2005 and 60 facilities in the first nine months of 2006 and (ii) an increase in operating expenses from our pool of “same-store” facilities of approximately $1.7 million (see “Same-Store Facility Results” below).

          General and administrative costs increased from $3.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2005 to $7.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006, an increase of $3.7 million, or 100%. The increase related primarily to severance costs of approximately $2.1 million, of which $0.5 million were non-cash, related to a Company restructuring of certain management positions. Additionally, the Company incurred higher payroll related expenses of approximately $0.8 million, increased audit and tax fees of approximately $0.5 million and the write-off of approximately $0.1 million of receivables.

          Depreciation increased from $10.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2005 to $16.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006, an increase of $5.5 million, or 50.9%. The increase is primarily attributable to the acquisition activity during 2005 and 2006.

     Total Other Expenses

          Interest expense increased from $9.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2005 to $12.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006, an increase of $2.3 million, or 23.7%. The increase is primarily attributable to a higher amount of outstanding debt in 2006.

          Loan procurement amortization expense decreased from $0.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2005 to $0.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006, a decrease of $0.1 million or 7.2%. The decrease is primarily attributable to lower financing costs attributable to the revolving credit facility entered into in 2006.

          Interest income remained flat at $0.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2005 and 2006.

     Income (Loss) Before Minority Interests

          The decrease in income (loss) from operations of $4.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006 was primarily attributable to higher property operating expense, increased depreciation expense and increased interest expense related to the acquisition of 79 properties since September 30, 2005.

     Comparison of Operating Results for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 and 2005

     Total Revenues

          Rental income increased from $97.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 to $147.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, an increase of $49.8 million, or 51.0%. This increase is primarily attributable to (i) the acquisition of 19 facilities in the last three months of 2005 and 60 facilities in the first nine months of 2006 and (ii) an increase in revenues from our pool of “same-store” facilities of approximately $3.6 million (see “Same-Store Facility Results” below). Additionally, the Company recorded approximately $0.4 million of revenue from business interruption insurance settlements received during the nine months ended September 30, 2006.

          Other property related income increased from $7.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 to $10.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, an increase of $3.4 million, or 47.4%. This increase is primarily attributable to the acquisition of 19 facilities in the last three months of 2005 and 60 facilities during the first nine months of 2006.

     Total Operating Expenses

          Property operating expenses increased from $37.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 to $61.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, an increase of $24.3 million, or 64.1%. This increase is primarily attributable to (i) the acquisition of 19 facilities in the last three months of 2005 and 60 facilities in the first nine months of 2006 and (ii) an increase in operating expenses from our pool of “same-store” facilities of approximately $3.2 million (see “Same-Store Facility Results” below).

          General and administrative costs increased from $9.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 to $17.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, an increase of $7.4 million, or 74.4%. The increase related primarily to approximately $3.0 million of increased compensation costs, $2.1 million of severance costs, of which $0.5 million were non-cash, associated with a Company restructuring of certain management positions, $0.6 million of increased audit and tax fees, $0.6 million of additional investor relation costs, $0.5 million of directors and officers insurance, and $0.2 million of additional rent expense.

          Depreciation increased from $27.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 to $46.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, an increase of $19.2 million, or 69.4%. The increase is primarily attributable to the acquisition activity in 2005 and 2006.

     Total Other Expenses

          Interest expense increased from $22.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 to $33.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, an increase of $10.3 million, or 45.6%. The increase is attributable primarily to a higher amount of outstanding debt in 2006.

          Loan procurement amortization expense increased from $1.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 to $2.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. The Company recorded a non-cash write-off of $1.3 million of loan procurement costs in connection with the replacement of its revolving credit facility in the first quarter of 2006.

          Interest income increased from $0.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 to $1.1 million in 2006. This increase is primarily attributable to the investment of excess proceeds received in October 2005 from the Company’s follow on public offering.

     Income (Loss) Before Minority Interests

          The decrease in income (loss) from continuing operations of $8.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 was primarily attributable to increased interest expense of $10.3 million offset by increased interest income of $1.0 million.

          The Company considers its same-store portfolio to consist of only those facilities owned at the beginning and at the end of the applicable periods presented.

          The following same-store presentation is considered to be useful to investors in evaluating our performance because it provides information relating to changes in facility-level operating performance without taking into account the effects of acquisitions, developments or dispositions. The following table sets forth operating data for our same-store portfolio for the periods presented.

          Comparison of the Same-Store Results for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2006 to the Three Months Ended September 30, 2005

          Same-store revenues increased from $29.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2005 to $30.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006, an increase of $1.1 million, or 3.8%. This increase is the result of $3.5 million of increased rents offset by $(2.4) million attributable to decreased occupancy.

          Same-store property operating expenses increased from $9.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2005 to $10.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006, an increase of $1.7 million, or 17.9%. This increase was primarily attributable to increased property taxes and insurance expense.

          Comparison of the Same-Store Results for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 to the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005

          Same-store revenues increased from $85.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 to $89.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, an increase of $3.6 million, or 4.2%. This increase is the result of $5.6 million of increased rents offset by $(2.0) million attributable to decreased occupancy.

          Same-store property operating expenses increased from $28.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 to $32.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, an increase of $3.2 million, or 11.3%. The increase was due to higher expenses primarily related to property taxes and repairs and maintenance as well as higher costs across all other operating expenses.

     A comparison of cash flow operating, investing and financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 is as follows:

     Comparison of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 to the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005

     Cash provided by operating activities increased from $36.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 to $48.2 for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, an increase of $11.4 million. The increase is primarily attributable to the acquisition of 19 self-storage facilities in the last three months of 2005 and 60 self-storage facilities in the first nine months of 2006.

     Cash used in investing activities increased from $284.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 to $341.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, an increase of $56.8 million. During the nine months ended September 30, 2005 the Company had acquisitions of approximately $432 million which was funded by approximately $268 million of cash expenditures and $164 million of non-cash items. During the nine months ended September 30, 2006 the Company had approximately $363 million of acquisitions which was funded by approximately $327 million cash expenditures and $36 million of non-cash items.

     Cash provided by financing activities decreased from $233.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 to $107.6 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2006, a decrease of $126.2 million. This decrease is primarily attributable to the availability to draw down on the excess proceeds in 2006 remaining from the October 2005 follow-on equity offering.

     Funds from operations, which we refer to as “FFO,” is a widely used performance measure for real estate companies and is provided here as a supplemental measure of operating performance. We calculate FFO in accordance with the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts White Paper. The White Paper defines FFO as net income (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains (or losses) from sales of property, plus depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures, if any, are calculated to reflect FFO on the same basis.

     Management uses FFO as a key performance indicator in evaluating the operations of our facilities. Given the nature of our business as a real estate owner and operator, we believe that FFO is helpful to management and investors as a starting point in measuring our operational performance because it excludes various items included in net income that do not relate to or are not indicative of our operating performance, such as gains (or losses) from sales of property and depreciation and amortization, which can make periodic and peer analyses of operating performance more difficult. FFO should not be considered as an alternative to net income (determined in accordance with GAAP) as an indicator of our financial performance, is not an alternative to cash flow from operating activities (determined in accordance with GAAP) as a measure of our liquidity, and is not indicative of funds available to fund our cash needs, including our ability to make distributions. Our computation of FFO may not be comparable to FFO reported by other REITs that do not define the term in accordance with the White Paper or that interpret the White Paper differently than we do. The following table sets forth the reconciliation of net income (loss), the most directly comparable GAAP measure, to FFO:

     In February 2006, we and our operating partnership entered into a new three-year, $250.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility. The credit facility allows us to increase the amount that may be borrowed up to $350.0 million at a later date. The facility is scheduled to mature in February 2009, with the option for a one-year extended maturity date. Borrowings under the facility bear interest, at our option, at either an alternative base rate or a Eurodollar rate, in each case plus an applicable margin depending on our leverage ratio. The alternative base interest rate is a fluctuating rate equal to the higher of the prime rate or the sum of the federal funds effective rate plus 50 basis points. The applicable margin for the alternative base rate will vary from 0.15% to 0.60%. The Eurodollar rate is a periodic fixed rate equal to LIBOR. The applicable margin for the Eurodollar rate will vary from 1.15% to 1.60%. The margin at September 30, 2006 was 1.30%. We intend to use this new credit facility principally to finance future acquisitions, development of self-storage facilities, debt repayments and for general working capital purposes. Upon entering into this agreement, we utilized the facility to repay a $30.0 million 60-day term loan.

     Our ability to borrow under this new credit facility will be subject to our ongoing compliance with the following financial covenants, among others:

     As of September 30, 2006, approximately $79.5 million was available under our revolving credit facility. As of September 30, 2006, the Company had total indebtedness outstanding of approximately $864.2 million, as compared to the $669.3 million of debt outstanding at December 31, 2005. At September 30, 2006, the Company was in compliance with all of its debt covenants.

     Our cash flow from operations historically has been one of our primary sources of liquidity to fund debt service, distributions and capital expenditures. We derive substantially all of our revenue from customers who lease space from us at our facilities. Therefore, our ability to generate cash from operations is dependent on the rents that we are able to charge and collect from our customers. While we believe that facilities in which we invest — self-storage facilities — are less sensitive to near-term economic downturns, prolonged economic downturns will adversely affect cash flow from operations.

     In order to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, we are required to distribute at least 90% of our REIT taxable income, excluding capital gains, to our shareholders on an annual basis or pay federal income tax.

     The nature of our business, coupled with the requirement that we distribute a substantial portion of our income on an annual basis, will cause us to have substantial liquidity needs over both the short term and the long term. Our short-term liquidity needs consist primarily of funds necessary to pay operating expenses associated with our facilities, refinancing of certain mortgage indebtedness, interest expense and scheduled principal payments on debt, expected distributions to limited partners and shareholders and recurring capital expenditures. These expenses, as well as the amount of recurring capital expenditures that we incur, will vary from year to year, in some cases significantly. For 2006 we expect to incur approximately $4.9 million of costs for recurring capital expenditures. In addition, we anticipate spending an additional approximately $3.9 million in 2006 for renovations and improvements at our facilities that were owned as of December 31, 2005.

     In October 2006, the Company repaid its 7.13% mortgage, for USI II a wholly-owned subsidiary, that had total principal outstanding of approximately $38.5 million. The debt was paid from proceeds obtained by drawing on the Company’s existing revolving credit facility.

     In November 2006, the Company and the Operating Partnership entered into a 30-day, unsecured $50.0 million bridge loan agreement with Wachovia Bank, National Association as the lender. The term loan bears interest at a variable rate of LIBOR plus 115 basis points. The proceeds of the $50.0 million bridge loan combined with borrowings under the Company’s revolving credit facility were used to repay its 8.16% mortgage, for Acquiport III a wholly-owned subsidiary, that had total principal outstanding of approximately $64.1 million in November 2006. The Company anticipates closing on a new $450 million credit facility in November 2006 to repay the bridge loan.

     Our long-term liquidity needs consist primarily of funds necessary to pay for development of new facilities, redevelopment of operating facilities, non-recurring capital expenditures, acquisitions of facilities and repayment of indebtedness at maturity. In particular, we intend to pursue the acquisition of additional facilities, which will require additional capital. We do not expect that we will have sufficient funds on hand to cover these long-term cash requirements. We will have to satisfy these needs through either additional borrowings, including borrowings under our revolving credit facility, sales of common or preferred shares and/or cash generated through facility dispositions and joint venture transactions.

     We believe we have access to multiple sources of capital to fund long-term liquidity requirements, including the incurrence of additional debt and the issuance of additional equity. However, we cannot provide any assurance that this will be the case. Our ability to incur additional indebtedness will be dependent on a number of factors, including our degree of leverage, the value of our unencumbered assets and borrowing restrictions that may be imposed by lenders. Our ability to access the equity capital markets will be dependent on a number of factors as well, including general market conditions for REITs and market perceptions about us.

     Storage facilities increased $331.7 million and cash decreased $185.2 million from December 31, 2005 to September 30, 2006, primarily due to the acquisition of 60 self-storage facilities during the first nine months of 2006.

     Additionally, accounts payable and accrued expenses and deferred revenue increased by $3.6 million and $1.5 million, respectively, during the nine months ended September 30, 2006, primarily due to the acquisition of 60 self-storage facilities during the same period.

          The following table summarizes our known contractual obligations as of September 30, 2006:

          We expect that the contractual obligations due in 2006 will be satisfied from the refinancing of two existing loans in 2006, out of cash generated from operations and, if required, draws on our revolving credit facility.

          The Company does not currently have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have, or are reasonably likely to have, a material current or future effect on its financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

          The Company’s future income, cash flows and fair values relevant to financial instruments depend upon prevailing interest rates. Market risk refers to the risk of loss from adverse changes in market prices and interest rates.

     Effect of Changes in Interest Rates on our Outstanding Debt

          As of September 30, 2006, the Company had approximately $170.5 million of variable rate debt outstanding (representing approximately 19.7% of its total debt). Based upon the balances outstanding on variable rate debt at September 30, 2006, a 100 basis point increase or decrease in interest rates on variable rate debt would increase or decrease future interest expense by approximately $1.7 million annually. The Company does not currently use derivative financial instruments to reduce our exposure to changes in interest rates.

          As of September 30, 2006, the Company had approximately $692.1 million of fixed rate debt outstanding (representing approximately 80.3% of total debt). A change in the interest rates on fixed rate debt generally impacts the fair value of the debt but it has no impact on interest incurred or cash flow. To determine the fair value, the fixed rate debt is discounted at a rate based upon current lending rates, assuming debt is outstanding through maturity or expected refinancing dates. At September 30, 2006, the fair value of the Company’s long term fixed rate debt was estimated to be $680.9 million. A 100 basis point increase in interest rates would result in a decrease in the fair value of this fixed rate debt of approximately $18.8 million at September 30, 2006. A 100 basis point decrease in interest rates would result in an increase in the fair value of this fixed rate debt of approximately $19.8 million at September 30, 2006.

     The Company has established disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act’)) to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Based on their evaluation as of the end of the third quarter of 2006, the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective to meet such objective and that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures adequately alert them on a timely basis to material information relating to the Company (including its consolidated subsidiaries) required to be included in the Company’s Exchange Act filings.

     Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

     In connection with the Company’s assessment of its internal control over financial reporting as required under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, management identified a number of improvements to our control environment that we are in the process of implementing, including changes to personnel and information technology systems.

     Management is taking the necessary steps to monitor and maintain appropriate internal controls during this period of change. No other changes occurred in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the third quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

     The following paragraph supplements the risk factors set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.

     We maintain comprehensive insurance on each of our self-storage facilities in amounts sufficient to permit replacement of the property, subject to applicable deductibles. Certain of our properties secure our mortgage-backed debt, some of which was assumed in connection with our acquisition of facilities, that requires us to maintain insurance at levels and on terms that are not commercially reasonable in the current insurance environment. We may be unable to obtain required insurance coverage if the cost and/or availability make it impractical or impossible to comply with debt covenants. If we cannot comply with a lender’s requirements in any respect, the lender could declare a default that could affect our ability to obtain future financing and could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and cash flows and our ability to obtain future financing. In addition, we may be required to self-insure against certain losses or the Company’s insurance costs may increase.

SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Date: November 9, 2006