Williams Companies
WMB
#262
Rank
$88.32 B
Marketcap
$72.28
Share price
1.62%
Change (1 day)
29.07%
Change (1 year)
Williams Companies is an American natural gas pipeline operator headquartered in Tulsa, Oklahoma.

Williams Companies - 10-Q quarterly report FY


Text size:
1

FORM 10-Q

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

(Mark One)

( X ) QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 1996
--------------------------------------------------

OR

( ) TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to
------------------------ ------------------------


Commission file number 1-4174
----------------------------------------------------------



THE WILLIAMS COMPANIES, INC.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



DELAWARE 73-0569878
- ---------------------------------- --------------------------------------
(State of Incorporation) (IRS Employer Identification Number)


ONE WILLIAMS CENTER
TULSA, OKLAHOMA 74172
- --------------------------------------- ---------------------------------
(Address of principal executive office) (Zip Code)


Registrant's telephone number: (918) 588-2000
--------------------------------

NO CHANGE
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Former name, former address and former fiscal year,
if changed since last report.


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes X No
------ ------

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes
of common stock as of the latest practicable date.

Class Outstanding at October 31, 1996
- --------------------------------- --------------------------------------
Common Stock, $1 par value 104,654,812 Shares
2
The Williams Companies, Inc.
Index


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Part I. Financial Information Page
----
<S> <C>
Item 1. Financial Statements


Consolidated Statement of Income--Three Months and Nine Months
Ended September 30, 1996 and 1995 2


Consolidated Balance Sheet--September 30, 1996 and
December 31, 1995 3


Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows--Nine Months
Ended September 30, 1996 and 1995 4


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 5


Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations 11


Part II. Other Information

Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K 16

Exhibit 3--By-laws as amended on September 19, 1996

Exhibit 11--Computation of Earnings Per Common and Common-
equivalent Share

Exhibit 12--Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Combined
Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividend
Requirements
</TABLE>



Portions of this document may constitute "forward-looking statements" as
defined by federal law. Although The Williams Companies, Inc. believes any
such statements are based on reasonable assumptions, there is no assurance that
actual outcomes will not be materially different. Additional information about
issues that could lead to material changes in performance is contained in The
Williams Companies, Inc.'s annual report on Form 10-K.





1
3

The Williams Companies, Inc.
Consolidated Statement of Income
(Unaudited)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(Millions, except per-share amounts)
------------------------------------------------------------
Three months ended Nine months ended
September 30, September 30,
------------------------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1996 1995
------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues:
Williams Interstate Natural Gas Systems (Note 4) $390.9 $354.3 $1,249.3 $1,029.8
Williams Field Services Group 161.0 142.4 527.7 419.5
Williams Energy Services 24.7 18.7 74.9 65.6
Williams Pipe Line 119.9 86.9 382.7 220.4
Williams Communications Group 189.0 131.9* 491.1* 394.0*
Other 12.1 3.7 37.3 13.7
Intercompany eliminations (55.4) (25.5) (189.6) (124.3)
------------------------------------------------------------
Total revenues 842.2 712.4 2,573.4 2,018.7
------------------------------------------------------------
Profit-center costs and expenses:
Costs and operating expenses 509.3 438.9 1,502.6 1,190.1
Selling, general and administrative expenses 138.0 119.0 415.4 354.0
Other income--net (2.9) (6.9) (3.9) (8.9)
------------------------------------------------------------
Total profit-center costs and expenses 644.4 551.0 1,914.1 1,535.2
------------------------------------------------------------
Operating profit (loss):
Williams Interstate Natural Gas Systems (Note 4) 121.8 86.7 409.9 273.1
Williams Field Services Group 45.1 43.6 138.4 114.4
Williams Energy Services 13.5 4.4 43.1 29.7
Williams Pipe Line 14.8 20.0 58.9 50.5
Williams Communications Group 2.1 6.6* 6.0* 17.0*
Other .5 .1 3.0 (1.2)
------------------------------------------------------------
Total operating profit 197.8 161.4 659.3 483.5
General corporate expenses (11.6) (7.5) (29.8) (25.6)
Interest accrued (93.5) (67.4) (265.6) (204.2)
Interest capitalized 2.1 4.7 4.5 10.5
Investing income 6.6 13.3 14.7 81.2
Loss on sale of investment (Note 5) -- -- -- (12.6)
Other income (expense)--net 2.2 .7 (4.1) (13.3)
------------------------------------------------------------
Income from continuing operations before income taxes 103.6 105.2 379.0 319.5
Provision for income taxes (Notes 5 and 6) 32.6 36.7 122.7 84.5
------------------------------------------------------------
Income from continuing operations 71.0 68.5 256.3 235.0
Income from discontinued operations (Note 7) -- -- -- 1,005.7
------------------------------------------------------------
Net income 71.0 68.5 256.3 1,240.7
Preferred stock dividends 2.6 7.1 7.8 12.6
------------------------------------------------------------
Income applicable to common stock $ 68.4 $ 61.4 $ 248.5 $1,228.1
============================================================


Primary earnings per common and common-equivalent share:
Income from continuing operations $ .63 $ .58 $ 2.30 $ 2.22
Income from discontinued operations (Note 7) -- -- -- 10.02
------------------------------------------------------------
Net income $ .63 $ .58 $ 2.30 $ 12.24
============================================================

Average shares (thousands) 108,275 105,507 108,094 100,373

Fully diluted earnings per common and common-equivalent share:
Income from continuing operations $ .63 $ .58 $ 2.27 $ 2.20
Income from discontinued operations (Note 7) -- -- -- 9.79
------------------------------------------------------------
Net income $ .63 $ .58 $ 2.27 $ 11.99
============================================================

Average shares (thousands) 112,311 109,587 112,126 102,730

Cash dividends per common share $ .34 $ .27 $ 1.02 $ .81
============================================================
</TABLE>


*Reclassified as described in Note 2.


See accompanying notes.


2
4
The Williams Companies, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheet
(Unaudited)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(Millions)
--------------------------------------
September 30, December 31,
1996 1995
--------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS

Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 40.5 $ 90.4
Receivables 641.9 525.0
Transportation and exchange gas receivable 97.6 152.3
Inventories 197.3 189.0
Deferred income taxes 248.7 213.9
Other 218.7 173.2
--------------------------------------
Total current assets 1,444.7 1,343.8

Investments 169.7 307.6

Property, plant and equipment, at cost (Note 3) 11,026.6 9,478.7
Less accumulated depreciation and depletion (1,815.8) (1,464.0)
--------------------------------------
9,210.8 8,014.7

Other assets and deferred charges 968.7 828.7
--------------------------------------
Total assets $11,793.9 $10,494.8
======================================

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

Current liabilities:
Notes payable (Note 10) $ 300.3 $ -
Accounts payable 408.4 472.0
Transportation and exchange gas payable 67.3 127.8
Accrued liabilities (Note 8) 1,032.9 1,130.2
Long-term debt due within one year (Note 10) 54.1 319.9
--------------------------------------
Total current liabilities 1,863.0 2,049.9

Long-term debt (Note 10) 4,137.3 2,874.0

Deferred income taxes 1,614.6 1,568.2

Other liabilities 834.9 815.6

Contingent liabilities and commitments (Note 12)

Stockholders' equity:
Preferred stock, $1 par value, 30,000,000 shares authorized, 3,244,052 shares
issued in 1996 and 3,739,452 shares issued in 1995 161.1 173.5
Common stock, $1 par value, 240,000,000 shares authorized, 106,536,630
shares issued in 1996 and 105,337,948 shares issued in 1995 106.5 105.3
Capital in excess of par value 1,092.1 1,051.1
Retained earnings 2,057.1 1,915.6
Unamortized deferred compensation (2.3) (2.3)
--------------------------------------
3,414.5 3,243.2

Less treasury stock (at cost), 1,967,627 shares of common stock in 1996
and 1,573,203 shares of common stock in 1995, 401,600 shares of
preferred stock in 1995 (Note 11) (70.4) (56.1)
--------------------------------------
Total stockholders' equity 3,344.1 3,187.1
--------------------------------------
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $11,793.9 $10,494.8
======================================
</TABLE>


See accompanying notes.


3
5

The Williams Companies, Inc.
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(Millions)
----------------------------------
Nine months ended September 30,
----------------------------------
1996 1995
----------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income $ 256.3 $ 1,240.7
Adjustments to reconcile to cash provided from operations:
Discontinued operations - (1,005.7)
Depreciation and depletion 326.4 272.8
Provision for deferred income taxes 10.5 22.7
Loss on sale of investment - 12.6
Changes in receivables sold (49.3) 32.5
Changes in receivables 100.7 108.2
Changes in inventories (14.3) (19.9)
Changes in other current assets (28.8) 31.5
Changes in accounts payable (49.4) (73.7)
Changes in accrued liabilities (26.9) 20.8
Net change in non-current unrealized trading assets and liabilities (45.6) (48.5)
Other, including changes in non-current assets and liabilities 32.2 (42.2)
----------------------------------
Net cash provided by operating activities 511.8 551.8
----------------------------------

FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from notes payable 356.8 90.4
Payments of notes payable (56.5) (558.2)
Proceeds from long-term debt 1,549.0 111.9
Payments of long-term debt (1,187.1) (823.6)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock 42.7 18.8
Purchases of treasury stock (33.8) (2.9)
Dividends paid (114.8) (88.4)
Subsidiary preferred stock redemptions - (193.7)
Other--net (3.3) 5.4
----------------------------------
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities 553.0 (1,440.3)
----------------------------------

INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Property, plant and equipment:
Capital expenditures (528.2) (597.6)
Proceeds from sales 24.3 27.4
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired (295.5) (817.1)
Proceeds from sale of businesses - 2,572.8
Income tax and other payments related to discontinued operations (255.2) (317.1)
Proceeds from sale of investment - 125.1
Purchase of note receivable - (75.1)
Purchase of investments (57.3) (4.4)
Other--net (2.8) 2.0
----------------------------------
Net cash provided (used) by investing activities (1,114.7) 916.0
----------------------------------
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents (49.9) 27.5

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 90.4 36.1
----------------------------------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 40.5 $ 63.6
==================================
</TABLE>


See accompanying notes.


4
6

The Williams Companies, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)

1. General

The accompanying interim consolidated financial statements of The
Williams Companies, Inc. (Williams) do not include all notes in annual
financial statements and therefore should be read in conjunction with the
financial statements and notes thereto in Williams' 1995 Annual Report on Form
10-K. The accompanying unaudited financial statements have not been audited by
independent auditors, but include all adjustments both normal recurring and
others which, in the opinion of Williams' management, are necessary to present
fairly its financial position at September 30, 1996, results of operations for
the three months and nine months ended September 30, 1996 and 1995, and cash
flows for the nine months ended September 30, 1996 and 1995.

Operating profit of operating companies may vary by quarter. Based on
current rate structures and/or historical maintenance schedules,
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line and Texas Gas Transmission experience lower
operating profits in the second and third quarters as compared to the first and
fourth quarters.

2. Basis of presentation

Williams Communications Group is a new business entity formed by
combining WilTel and WilTech Group, previously reported separately. As a
result of this combination, revenues and operating profit amounts for the three
months and nine months ended September 30, 1995, have been reclassified to
conform to current classifications.

Revenues and operating profit amounts for the three months and nine
months ended September 30, 1995, include the operating results of Transco
Energy Company since its January 18, 1995, acquisition by Williams.

3. Kern River Gas Transmission acquisition

On January 16, 1996, Williams acquired the remaining interest in Kern
River Gas Transmission Company (Kern River) for $206 million in cash. The
acquisition is accounted for as a purchase and the acquired assets and
liabilities have been recorded based on an allocation of the purchase price.
Substantially all of the purchase price in excess of the carrying value from
the January acquisition of Kern River has been allocated to property, plant and
equipment. Revenues and operating profit amounts for the three months and nine
months ended September 30, 1996, include the operating results of Kern River
since the acquisition date. Prior to this acquisition, Williams accounted for
its 50 percent ownership in Kern River using the equity method of accounting,
with its share of equity earnings recorded in investing income.


4. Williams Interstate Natural Gas Systems

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Three months ended September 30,
--------------------------------
(Millions) Revenues Operating Profit
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1996 1995
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northwest Pipeline $ 69.1 $ 75.7 $ 36.1 $37.3
Williams Natural Gas 43.4 34.0 11.9 12.0
Transcontinental Gas
Pipe Line 180.6 188.0 40.5 33.9
Texas Gas Transmission 55.0 56.6 2.7 3.5
Kern River Gas
Transmission 42.8 - 30.6 -

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$390.9 $354.3 $121.8 $86.7
====================================================================================================================
</TABLE>


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Nine months ended September 30,
-------------------------------
(Millions) Revenues Operating Profit
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1996 1995
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northwest Pipeline $ 205.6 $ 193.8 $103.1 $ 90.6
Williams Natural Gas 131.8 113.3 33.9 29.5
Transcontinental Gas
Pipe Line 572.8 535.6 133.6 117.6
Texas Gas Transmission 220.6 187.1 55.6 35.4
Kern River Gas
Transmission 118.5 - 83.7 -
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$1,249.3 $1,029.8 $409.9 $273.1
====================================================================================================================
</TABLE>

5. Sale of investment

In the second quarter of 1995, Williams sold its 15 percent interest in
Texasgulf Inc. for approximately $124 million in cash, which resulted in an
after-tax gain of approximately $16 million because of previously unrecognized
tax benefits included in the provision for income taxes.

6. Provision for income taxes

The provision (credit) for income taxes from continuing operations includes:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Three months ended Nine months ended
(Millions) September 30, September 30,
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1996 1995
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Current:
Federal $28.4 $35.4 $101.3 $46.3
State (4.0) 5.5 10.9 15.5
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
24.4 40.9 112.2 61.8
Deferred:
Federal 7.8 (6.2) 8.6 23.2
State .4 2.0 1.9 (.5)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
8.2 (4.2) 10.5 22.7
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total provision $32.6 $36.7 $122.7 $84.5
====================================================================================================================
</TABLE>


5
7
The Williams Companies, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
(Unaudited)


The effective income tax rate in 1996 is less than the federal
statutory rate due primarily to income tax credits from coal-seam gas
production, partially offset by the effects of state income taxes. Both 1996
periods include approximately $6 million, net of federal income tax effect, from
the effects of state income tax adjustments related to 1995. In addition, the
nine months ended September 30, 1996, include the second quarter recognition of
favorable adjustments totaling $10 million related to research credits and
previously provided deferred income taxes on certain regulated capital
projects.

The effective income tax rate in 1995 is less than the federal
statutory rate due primarily to income tax credits from coal-seam gas
production, partially offset by the effects of state income taxes and minority
interest. In addition, the nine months ended September 30, 1995, include the
previously unrecognized tax benefits related to the sale of Texasgulf Inc. (see
Note 5) and recognition of an $8 million income tax benefit resulting from
settlements with taxing authorities, both recorded in the second quarter.

Cash payments for income taxes for continuing and discontinued
operations for the nine months ended September 30, 1996 and 1995, are $352
million and $343 million, respectively.

7. Discontinued operations

On January 5, 1995, Williams sold its network services operations to
LDDS Communications, Inc. (LDDS) for $2.5 billion in cash. The sale yielded a
gain of $1 billion (net of income taxes of approximately $732 million) which is
reported as income from discontinued operations. Under the terms of the
agreement, Williams retained Williams Telecommunications Systems, Inc.
(WilTel), a national telecommunications equipment supplier and service company,
and Vyvx, Inc. (included in WilTech Group), which operates a national video
network specializing in broadcast television applications and satellite
transmission. Both companies are included in Williams Communications Group
(see Note 2).

8. Accrued liabilities

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
September 30, December 31,
(Millions) 1996 1995
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Rate refunds $ 269.4 $ 180.6
Employee costs 162.3 135.9
Income taxes payable 130.5 371.6
Taxes other than income taxes 80.7 51.2
Interest 73.8 72.9
Other 316.2 318.0
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$1,032.9 $1,130.2
=====================================================================================
</TABLE>

9. Adoption of accounting standard

Effective January 1, 1996, Williams adopted Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 121, "Accounting for Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of." Adoption of the standard had no
effect on Williams' financial position or results of operations.

10. Long-term debt

Long-term debt consists of the following amounts:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Weighted
average
interest September 30, December 31,
(Millions) rate* 1996 1995
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
The Williams Companies, Inc.
Revolving credit loans - $ - $ 50.0
Debentures, 8.875% -
10.25%, payable 2012,
2020, 2021 and 2025 9.6 587.5 587.7
Notes, 7.5% - 9.625%,
payable through 2001 8.8 818.4 842.4
Northwest Pipeline
Debentures, 7.125% -
10.65%, payable
through 2025 9.0 360.0 369.2
Adjustable rate notes,
payable through 2002 9.0 10.0 11.7
Williams Natural Gas
Variable rate notes,
payable 1999 5.9 130.0 130.0
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line
Debentures, 7.08% and
9.125%, payable 1998
through 2026 8.0 351.6 153.0
Notes, 8.125% - 9%,
payable 1996, 1997
and 2002 8.7 378.2 381.1
Adjustable rate notes,
payable 2000 - - 125.1
Texas Gas Transmission
Notes, 9.625% and
8.625%, payable 1997
and 2004 9.0 254.1 255.9
Kern River Gas Transmission
Notes, 6.42% and 6.72%,
payable through 2001 6.6 617.7 -
Williams Holdings of Delaware
Revolving credit loans 5.9 303.0 150.0
Debentures, 6.25%,
due 2006 6.3 248.8 -
Williams Pipe Line
Notes, 8.95% and 9.78%,
payable through 2001 9.4 100.0 110.0
Williams Energy Ventures
Adjustable rate notes,
payable through 2002 8.1 25.6 21.0
Other, payable through 1999 7.7 6.5 6.8

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4,191.4 3,193.9
Current portion of long-term debt (54.1) (319.9)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$4,137.3 $2,874.0
============================================================================================================
</TABLE>

*At September 30, 1996.

In January 1996, Williams entered into a $205 million short-term borrowing
agreement to finance the purchase of the


6
8
The Williams Companies, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
(Unaudited)


remaining interest in Kern River Gas Transmission Company (See Note 3).

Under Williams' $800 million credit agreement, Northwest Pipeline,
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line, Texas Gas Transmission, Williams Pipe Line and
Williams Holdings of Delaware, Inc. (Williams Holdings) have access to varying
amounts of the facility while Williams (parent) has access to all unborrowed
amounts. Interest rates vary with current market conditions.

For financial statement reporting purposes, $351 million in current debt
obligations have been classified as non-current obligations based on Williams'
intent and ability to refinance on a long-term basis. At September 30, 1996,
the amount available on the $800 million credit agreement of $497 million is
sufficient to complete these refinancings.

During March 1996, the Kern River floating-rate bank loan was refinanced
through the issuance of 6.42 percent and 6.72 percent fixed-rate notes.
Interest-rate swap agreements entered into by Kern River in prior years which
effectively converted floating-rate debt to a fixed 9.1 percent remain
outstanding. Concurrent with the refinancing, Kern River entered into
additional interest-rate swap agreements which effectively offset the original
interest-rate swaps and adjust the new fixed-rate notes to an effective
interest rate of 8.5 percent.

In April 1996, Williams Holdings entered into an interest-rate swap
agreement which effectively converted its 6.25 percent fixed rate debentures to
floating-rate debt (4.66 percent at September 30, 1996).

Cash payments for interest (net of amounts capitalized) for the nine months
ended September 30, 1996 and 1995, are $279 million and $197 million,
respectively.

11. Treasury stock

In the third quarter of 1996, the Williams' board of directors authorized
the open-market purchase of up to $800 million of Williams common stock. At
September 30, 1996, 638,500 shares had been repurchased at a total cost of
$31.2 million.

12. Contingent liabilities and commitments

Rate and regulatory matters and related litigation

Williams' interstate pipeline subsidiaries, including Williams Pipe Line,
have various regulatory proceedings pending. As a result of rulings in certain
of these proceedings, a portion of the revenues of these subsidiaries has been
collected subject to refund. As to Williams Pipe Line, revenues collected
subject to refund were $231 million at September 30, 1996; it is not expected
that the amount of any refunds ordered would be significant. Accordingly, no
portion of these revenues has been reserved for refund. As to the other
pipelines, see Note 8 for the amount of revenues reserved for potential refund
as of September 30, 1996.

In 1992, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued Order 636,
Order 636-A and Order 636-B. These orders, which were challenged in various
respects by various parties in proceedings recently ruled on by the U.S. Court
of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, require interstate gas pipeline companies to
change the manner in which they provide services. Kern River Gas Transmission
implemented its restructuring on August 1, 1993, Williams Natural Gas
implemented its restructuring on October 1, 1993, and Northwest Pipeline, Texas
Gas and Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line implemented their restructurings on
November 1, 1993. Certain aspects of each pipeline company's restructuring
have been under appeal.

On July 16, 1996, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit issued an
order which in part affirmed and in part remanded Order No. 636. However, the
court stated that Order No. 636 would remain in effect until FERC issued a
final order on remand after considering the remanded issues. With the issuance
of this decision, the stay on the appeals of individual pipeline's
restructuring cases will be lifted. The only appeal challenging Northwest
Pipeline's restructuring has been dismissed.

Contract reformations and gas purchase deficiencies

Each of the natural gas pipeline subsidiaries has undertaken the
reformation or termination of its respective gas supply contracts. None of the
pipelines has any significant pending supplier take-or-pay, ratable take or
minimum take claims.

In 1994, Williams Natural Gas and a producer executed a number of
agreements to resolve outstanding issues. Portions of the settlement were
subject to regulatory approvals, including the regulatory abandonment of a
certain Williams Natural Gas gathering system on terms acceptable to Williams
Natural Gas. In May 1995, the FERC issued orders granting the requisite
approvals. One party requested rehearing of the decision regarding abandonment
of the gathering system and in April 1996, the FERC affirmed its May 1995
decision, and on July 23, 1996, FERC issued an order denying rehearing.

Current FERC policy associated with Orders 436 and 500 requires interstate
gas pipelines to absorb some of the cost of reforming gas supply contracts
before allowing any recovery through direct bill or surcharges to
transportation as well as sales commodity rates. Under Orders 636, 636-A and
636-B, costs incurred to comply with these rules are permitted to be recovered
in full, although 10 percent of such costs must be allocated to interruptible
transportation service.

The previously mentioned July 16, 1996, D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals
decision concerning Order No. 636 has remanded to FERC the issues of whether
pipelines should absorb any portion of Order No. 636 transition costs and
whether 10 percent of such costs should have been allocated to interruptible
transportation services.

Pursuant to a stipulation and agreement approved by the FERC, Williams
Natural Gas has made six filings to direct bill take-or-pay and gas supply
realignment costs. The first provided for the offset of certain amounts
collected subject to refund against previous take-or-pay direct-billed amounts
and, in addition, covered $24 million in new costs. This filing was approved,
and the final direct-billed amount, taking into consideration the offset, was
$15 million. The second filing covered $18 million in gas supply realignment
costs, and provided for an offset of $3 million. The third filing covered





7
9
The Williams Companies, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
(Unaudited)


$6.5 million in gas supply realignment costs. The remaining filings covered
additional costs of $12 million, which are similar in nature to the costs in
the second filing. An intervenor has filed a protest seeking to have the
Commission review the prudence of certain of the costs covered by all of the
filings made subsequent to the first filing, except for the third filing. On
July 31, 1996, the administrative law judge issued an initial decision
rejecting the intervenor's prudency challenge on the second filing. As of
September 30, 1996, this subsidiary had an accrual of $81 million for its
then-estimated remaining contract-reformation and gas supply realignment costs.
Williams Natural Gas will make additional filings under the applicable FERC
orders to recover such further costs as may be incurred in the future.
Williams Natural Gas has recorded a regulatory asset of approximately $81
million for estimated future recovery of the foregoing costs.

In September 1995, Texas Gas received FERC approval of a settlement
regarding Texas Gas' recovery of gas supply realignment costs. The settlement
provides that Texas Gas will recover 100 percent of such costs up to $50
million, will share in costs incurred between $50 million and $80 million, and
will absorb any such costs above $80 million. The settlement also extends Texas
Gas' pricing differential mechanism to November 1, 1996, and beyond that date
for contracts in litigation as of that date. Through September 30, 1996, Texas
Gas has paid or expects to pay approximately $80 million, previously accrued,
for gas supply realignment costs, primarily as a result of contract
terminations. Texas Gas has recovered approximately $54 million plus interest
in gas supply realignment costs and, in accordance with the terms of its
settlement, has a regulatory asset recorded at September 30, 1996, of
approximately $13 million for the estimated future recovery of such costs, which
is expected to be collected from customers prior to December 31, 1997. Ninety
percent of the cost recovery is collected through demand surcharges on Texas
Gas' firm transportation rates; the remaining 10 percent is recoverable from
interruptible transportation service.

The foregoing accruals are in accordance with Williams' accounting policies
regarding the establishment of such accruals which take into consideration
estimated total exposure, as discounted and risk-weighted, as well as costs and
other risks associated with the difference between the time costs are incurred
and the time such costs are recovered from customers. The estimated portion of
such costs recoverable from customers is deferred or recorded as a regulatory
asset based on an estimate of expected recovery of the amounts allowed by FERC
policy. While Williams believes that these accruals are adequate and the
associated regulatory assets are appropriate, costs actually incurred and
amounts actually recovered from customers will depend upon the outcome of
various court and FERC proceedings, the success of settlement negotiations and
various other factors, not all of which are presently foreseeable.

Environmental matters

Since 1989, Texas Gas and Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line have had studies
underway to test certain of their facilities for the presence of toxic and
hazardous substances to determine to what extent, if any, remediation may be
necessary. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line has responded to data requests
regarding such potential contamination of certain of its sites. The costs of
any such remediation will depend upon the scope of the remediation. At
September 30, 1996, these subsidiaries had reserves totaling approximately $42
million for these costs.

Certain Williams subsidiaries, including Texas Gas and Transcontinental Gas
Pipe Line, have been identified as potentially responsible parties (PRP) at
various Superfund and state waste disposal sites. Although no assurances can
be given, Williams does not believe that the PRP status of these subsidiaries
will have a material adverse effect on its financial position, results of
operations or net cash flows.

Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line, Texas Gas and Williams Natural Gas have
identified polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) contamination in air compressor
systems, soils and related properties at certain compressor station sites.
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line, Texas Gas and Williams Natural Gas have also
been involved in negotiations with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) and state agencies to develop screening, sampling and cleanup programs.
In addition, negotiations with certain environmental authorities and other
programs concerning investigative and remedial actions relative to potential
mercury contamination at certain gas metering sites have been commenced by
Williams Natural Gas, Texas Gas and Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line. As of
September 30, 1996, Williams Natural Gas had recorded a liability for
approximately $24 million, representing the current estimate of future
environmental cleanup costs to be incurred over the next six to ten years.
Texas Gas and Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line likewise had recorded liabilities
for these costs which are included in the $43 million reserve mentioned above.
Actual costs incurred will depend on the actual number of contaminated sites
identified, the actual amount and extent of contamination discovered, the final
cleanup standards mandated by the EPA and other governmental authorities and
other factors. Texas Gas, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line and Williams Natural
Gas have deferred these costs pending recovery as incurred through future rates
and other means.

In connection with the 1987 sale of the assets of Agrico Chemical Company,
Williams agreed to indemnify the purchaser for environmental cleanup costs
resulting from certain conditions at specified locations, to the extent such
costs exceed a specified amount. It appears certain that such costs will
exceed this amount. At September 30, 1996, Williams had approximately $9
million accrued for such excess costs. The actual costs incurred will depend
on the actual amount and extent of contamination discovered, the final cleanup
standards mandated by the EPA or other governmental authorities, and other
factors.

A lawsuit was filed in May 1993, in a state court in Colorado in which
certain claims have been made against various defendants, including Northwest
Pipeline, contending that gas exploration and development activities in portions
of the San Juan Basin have caused air, water and other contamination. The
plaintiffs in the case sought certification of a plaintiff class. In June 1994,
the lawsuit was dismissed for failure to join an indispensable party over which
the state court had no jurisdiction. The Colorado court of appeals has affirmed
the dismissal and remanded the





8
10
The Williams Companies, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
(Unaudited)


case to Colorado district court for action consistent with the appeals court's
decision. Since June 1994, eight individual lawsuits have been filed against
Northwest Pipeline and others in U.S. district court in Colorado, making
essentially the same claims. Northwest Pipeline is vigorously defending these
lawsuits.

Other legal matters

In December 1991, the Southern Ute Indian Tribe (the Tribe) filed a lawsuit
against Williams Production, a wholly owned subsidiary of Williams, and other
gas producers in the San Juan Basin area, alleging that certain coal strata
were reserved by the United States for the benefit of the Tribe and that the
extraction of coal-seam gas from the coal strata was wrongful. The Tribe seeks
compensation for the value of the coal-seam gas. The Tribe also seeks an order
transferring to the Tribe ownership of all of the defendants' equipment and
facilities utilized in the extraction of the coal-seam gas. In September 1994,
the court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants and the Tribe
lodged an interlocutory appeal with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth
Circuit. Williams Production agreed to indemnify the Williams Coal Seam Gas
Royalty Trust (Trust) against any losses that may arise in respect of certain
properties subject to the lawsuit. In addition, if the Tribe is successful in
showing that Williams Production has no rights in the coal- seam gas, Williams
Production has agreed to pay to the Trust for distribution to then-current
unitholders, an amount representing a return of a portion of the original
purchase price paid for the units. While Williams believes that such a payment
is not probable, it has reserved a portion of the proceeds from the sale of the
units in the Trust.

In October 1990, Dakota Gasification Company (Dakota), the owner of the
Great Plains Coal Gasification Plant (Plant), filed suit in the U.S. District
Court in North Dakota against Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line and three other
pipeline companies alleging that the pipeline companies had not complied with
their respective obligations under certain gas purchase and gas transportation
contracts. In September 1992, Dakota and the Department of Justice on behalf
of the Department of Energy filed an amended complaint adding as defendants in
the suit, Transco Energy Company, Transco Coal Gas Company and all of the other
partners in the partnership that originally constructed the Plant and each of
the parent companies of these entities. Dakota and the Department of Justice
sought declaratory and injunctive relief and the recovery of damages, alleging
that the four pipeline defendants underpaid for gas, collectively, as of June
30, 1992, by more than $232 million plus interest and for additional damages
for transportation services and costs and expenses including attorneys' fees.
In March 1994, the parties executed definitive agreements which would settle
the litigation subject to final non-appealable regulatory approvals. The
settlement is also subject to a FERC ruling that Transcontinental Gas Pipe
Line's existing authority to recover in rates certain costs related to the
purchase and transportation of gas produced by Dakota will pertain to gas
purchase and transportation costs Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line will pay
Dakota under the terms of the settlement. In October 1994, the FERC issued an
order consolidating Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line's petition for approval of
the settlement with similar petitions pending relative to two of the other
three pipeline companies (the third pipeline having entered into a settlement)
and setting the matter for hearing before an administrative law judge. In
December 1995, the administrative law judge issued an initial decision in which
he rejected the settlement agreements, finding that they were not prudent, and
he ordered the pipeline companies to refund to their customers amounts
collected since May 1993, in excess of the amounts he determined were
appropriate. At the time of the ruling, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line
estimated that its share of the refunds the administrative law judge would
require was approximately $75 million. The pipelines would be entitled to
collect the amount of any such customer refunds from Dakota. The
administrative law judge's decision is subject to review by the FERC. In
February 1996, certain parties filed with the FERC a motion requesting that the
FERC establish an additional proceeding to consider claims for additional
refunds. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line's share of these claimed additional
refunds is $90 million and pertain to amounts paid to Dakota from November 1,
1988, to May 1, 1993. The pipelines have opposed this motion. The FERC held
oral argument September 25, 1996.

In connection with agreements to resolve take-or-pay and other contract
claims and to amend gas purchase contracts, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line and
Texas Gas each entered into certain settlements with producers which may
require the indemnification of certain claims for additional royalties which
the producers may be required to pay as a result of such settlements. As a
result of such settlements, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line and Texas Gas were
named as defendants in, respectively, six and two lawsuits. Six of the eight
lawsuits have been settled for cash payments aggregating approximately $8.9
million, all of which have previously been accrued, and of which approximately
$3 million is recoverable as transition costs under Order 636. Damages,
including interest, of approximately $29 million, have been asserted in the
remaining cases. Producers have received and may receive other demands which
could result in additional claims. Indemnification for royalties will depend
on, among other things, the specific lease provisions between the producer and
the lessor and the terms of the settlement between the producer and either
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line or Texas Gas. Texas Gas may file to recover 75
percent of any such additional amounts it may be required to pay pursuant to
indemnities for royalties under the provisions of Order 528.

In November 1994, Continental Energy Associates Limited Partnership (the
Partnership) filed a voluntary petition under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code
with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania. The
Partnership owns a cogeneration facility in Hazelton, Pennsylvania (the
Facility). Hazelton Fuel Management Company (HFMC), a subsidiary of Transco
Energy, formerly supplied natural gas and fuel oil to the Facility. As of
September 30, 1996, HFMC had current outstanding receivables from the
Partnership of approximately $20 million, all of which has been reserved. The
construction of the Facility was funded by several banks that have a security
interest in all of the Partnership's assets. HFMC has asserted to the
Bankruptcy Court that payment of its receivables is superior to


9
11
The Williams Companies, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
(Unaudited)


the lien of the banks and intends to vigorously pursue the collection of such
amounts. HFMC has also filed suit against the lead bank with respect to this
and other matters, including the alleged tortious interference with HFMC's
contractual relations with the Partnership and other parties. In March 1995,
the Bankruptcy Court approved the rejection of the gas supply contract between
the Partnership and HFMC. HFMC has in turn asserted force majeure under a
contract with a producer under which HFMC purchased natural gas for the
Facility. The Partnership recently negotiated favorable buyouts of its power
purchase agreements with two electric utilities. The buyouts are subject to
Bankruptcy Court and Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission approvals.

On July 18, 1996, an individual filed a lawsuit in the United States
District Court for the District of Columbia against 70 natural gas pipelines
and other gas purchasers or former gas purchasers. All of Williams' natural
gas pipeline subsidiaries are named as defendants in the lawsuit. The
plaintiff claims, on behalf of the United States under the False Claims Act,
that the pipelines have incorrectly measured the heating value or volume of gas
purchased by the defendants. The plaintiff claims that the United States has
lost royalty payments as a result of these practices. The pipelines intend to
vigorously defend against these claims.

In addition to the foregoing, various other proceedings are pending against
Williams or its subsidiaries which are incidental to their operations.

Summary

While no assurances may be given, Williams does not believe that the
ultimate resolution of the foregoing matters, taken as a whole and after
consideration of amounts accrued, insurance coverage, recovery from customers
or other indemnification arrangements, will have a materially adverse effect
upon Williams' future financial position, results of operations and cash flow
requirements.





10
12

ITEM 2.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations


Third Quarter 1996 vs. Third Quarter 1995

NORTHWEST PIPELINE'S revenues decreased $6.6 million, or 9 percent, due
primarily to the effect of a 1995 reversal of approximately $16 million of
certain accrued liabilities for estimated rate refunds, partially offset by
approximately $3 million in 1996 related to a favorable regulatory decision. In
addition, transportation rates increased effective February 1, 1996, associated
with the expansion of mainline capacity placed into service on December 1, 1995.
Total throughput increased 10.3 TBtu, or 6 percent, associated with the
expansion of mainline capacity. Operating profit decreased $1.2 million, or 3
percent, due primarily to the approximate $11 million net effect of two reserve
accrual adjustments in 1995. One was a $16 million favorable adjustment of rate
refund accruals based on recent rate case developments. Partially offsetting
this was a loss accrual (included in other income--net) in connection with a
lawsuit involving a former transportation customer. In addition, operating
profit this quarter benefitted from increased rates associated with the
expansion of mainline capacity.
WILLIAMS NATURAL GAS' revenues increased $9.4 million, or 27 percent, due
primarily to the effect of the 1995 direct bill refund of gas purchases of
approximately $8 million and increased transportation revenue of $2 million. The
increase in transportation revenue is due primarily to the collection of gas
supply realignment costs. Total throughput decreased 7.1 TBtu, or 11 percent,
due primarily to lower interruptible volumes. Costs and operating expenses
increased $11 million, or 80 percent, due primarily to the effect of the 1995
direct bill refund of gas purchases and the amortization in 1996 of gas supply
realignment costs. Operating profit decreased $100,000, or 1 percent.
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE'S revenues decreased $7.4 million, or 4
percent, due primarily to lower transportation costs charged to Transco by
others and recovered in Transco's rates, partially offset by approximately $7
million in higher transportation revenue. Transportation revenue increased due
primarily to increased throughput and new rates effective September 1, 1995,
which allow the passthrough of increased costs. Total throughput increased 12.1
TBtu, or 4 percent, due primarily to increased long haul and firm production
area transportation volumes. Costs and expenses decreased $14 million, or 9
percent, due primarily to lower transportation costs charged to Transco by
others. Operating profit increased $6.6 million, or 19 percent, due primarily to
higher transportation revenue and lower general and administrative expenses of
approximately $2 million, partially offset by increased operation and
maintenance expense of approximately $3 million. Because of its rate structure
and historical maintenance schedule, Transco typically experiences lower
operating profit in the second and third quarters as compared to the first and
fourth quarters of the year.
TEXAS GAS TRANSMISSION'S revenues decreased $1.6 million, or 3 percent, due
primarily to a lower level of recoverable costs. Total throughput increased 19.1
TBtu, or 13 percent. Operating profit decreased $800,000, or 23 percent, due
primarily to higher operating and maintenance expense. Because of its rate
structure, Texas Gas typically experiences lower operating profit in the second
and third quarters as compared to the first and fourth quarters.
KERN RIVER GAS TRANSMISSION (KERN RIVER) operates a natural gas pipeline
system extending from Wyoming through Nevada to California. On January 16, 1996,
Williams acquired the remaining interest in Kern River. Revenues were $42.8
million in the third quarter of 1996, while costs and operating expenses were $9
million, selling, general and administrative expenses were $3 million and
operating profit was $30.6 million. Prior to the acquisition, Williams accounted
for its 50 percent ownership in Kern River using the equity method of
accounting, with its share of equity earnings recorded in investing income.
Equity earnings for the third quarter of 1995 was $8 million. Throughput was
68.5 TBtu in the third quarter of 1996. Throughput for the third quarter of 1996
is comparable to third-quarter 1995.
WILLIAMS FIELD SERVICES GROUP'S revenues increased $18.6 million, or 13
percent, due primarily to higher processing and natural gas liquids sales
revenues of $3 million and $14 million, respectively. Processing and natural gas
liquids volumes increased 14 percent and 49 percent, respectively, and average
natural gas liquids prices also increased. A 21 percent increase in gathering
volumes was offset by lower average gathering rates. Costs and operating
expenses increased $6 million, or 6 percent, due primarily to expanded
facilities and increased operations. Other income--net for 1996 includes a $3
million gain from the sale of a small gathering system in the Texas panhandle.
Other income--net for 1995 includes $12 million in operating profit from the net
effect of two unrelated items. One was $20 million of income from the favorable
resolution of contingency issues involving previously regulated gathering and
processing assets. This was partially offset by an $8 million loss accrual for a
future minimum price natural gas purchase commitment. Operating profit increased
$1.5 million, or 3 percent, due primarily to increased gas liquids margins and
higher processing revenues, largely offset by higher costs and operating
expenses associated with expanded facilities and increased operations and the
1995 $12 million net effect of two unrelated items in other income--net.
WILLIAMS ENERGY SERVICES' revenues increased $6 million, or 32 percent, due
primarily to higher price-risk management revenues of $14 million, partially
offset by lower natural gas physical trading and contract origination revenues
of $5 million and $2 million, respectively. The





11
13
ITEM 2.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations


natural gas physical trading volumes increase of 12 percent from growth in
west and mid-continent trading activity was more than offset by lower physical
trading margins of $7 million. Operating profit increased $9.1 million from $4.4
million in 1995 due primarily to the increase in revenues combined with a
reduction of development costs associated with its information products
business, partially offset by higher selling, general and administrative
expenses.
WILLIAMS PIPE LINE'S (INCLUDING WILLIAMS ENERGY VENTURES) revenues increased
$33 million, or 38 percent, due primarily to an increase in non-transportation
revenue combined with a 3 percent increase in shipments. The increase in
non-transportation revenue is due primarily to Williams Energy Ventures' ethanol
sales following the August 1995 acquisition of Pekin Energy and the
fourth-quarter 1995 completion of the Nebraska Energy plant, combined with
higher product marketing and services revenue. Costs and operating expenses
increased $37 million, or 64 percent, due primarily to ethanol production
activities. Operating profit (including Williams Energy Ventures) decreased $5.2
million, or 26 percent, due primarily to the decision to suspend ethanol
production to perform efficiency maintenance on ethanol production plants during
the third-quarter 1996, a period of record high corn prices. This was slightly
offset by the increase in transportation revenue. Williams Energy Ventures'
results declined $6.3 million to a $5.2 million operating loss in 1996. During
the fourth-quarter 1996, corn prices returned to more traditionally normal
levels. In September 1996, Williams Energy Ventures announced it had acquired a
45.5 percent interest in eight petroleum products terminals in the Southeast,
giving it a platform to market services in the southeastern region of the
country.
WILLIAMS COMMUNICATIONS GROUP'S revenues increased $57.1 million, or 43
percent, due primarily to $31 million from the acquisitions of Global Access
Telecommunications Services, ComLink, Inc., NUS Training, the teleports of ICG
Wireless Services, ITC mediaConferencing and SoftIRON Systems. Additionally,
increased business activity resulted in an $18 million revenue increase in new
systems. Billable minutes from occasional service and the number of ports in
service at September 30, 1996, increased 30 percent and 11 percent,
respectively, compared to September 30, 1995. Costs and operating expenses
increased $47 million, or 47 percent, and selling, general and administrative
expenses increased $15 million, or 60 percent, due primarily to the overall
increase in business activity and higher expenses for developing additional
products and services, including expenses of the acquired operations. Operating
profit decreased $4.5 million, or 68 percent, due primarily to the expense of
developing additional products and services along with integrating the most
recent acquisitions.
GENERAL CORPORATE EXPENSES increased $4.1 million, or 55 percent, due
primarily to higher professional services. Interest accrued increased $26.1
million, or 39 percent, due primarily to higher borrowing levels including $643
million of debt assumed with the acquisition of Kern River (see Note 3),
slightly offset by lower average interest rates. Interest capitalized decreased
$2.6 million, or 56 percent, due primarily to lower capital expenditures for
gathering and processing facilities. Investing income decreased $6.7 million, or
50 percent, due primarily to $8 million lower equity earnings from Williams' 50
percent ownership in Kern River. Kern Rivers' 1996 operating results are
included in operating profit (see Note 3). The effective income tax rate in 1996
is less than the federal statutory rate due primarily to income tax credits from
coal-seam gas production, partially offset by the effects of state income taxes.
In addition, 1996 includes approximately $6 million, net of federal income tax
effect, from the effects of state income tax adjustments related to 1995. The
effective income tax rate in 1995 approximates the federal statutory rate as the
effect of state income taxes was offset by income tax credits from coal-seam gas
production.
Preferred stock dividends decreased $4.5 million, or 64 percent, due primarily
to the difference in the fair value of subordinated debentures issued and the
carrying value of the $2.21 cumulative preferred stock exchanged in 1995.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 1996 vs. Nine Months Ended September 30, 1995

NORTHWEST PIPELINE'S revenues increased $11.8 million, or 6 percent, due
primarily to increased transportation rates, effective February 1, 1996,
associated with the expansion of mainline capacity placed into service on
December 1, 1995, and approximately $8 million related to reserve reversals and
favorable regulatory decisions, partially offset by the effect of the 1995
reversal of approximately $16 million of certain accrued liabilities for
estimated rate refund accruals. Total throughput increased 52.1 TBtu, or 9
percent. Operating profit increased $12.5 million, or 14 percent, due primarily
to increased transportation rates associated with the expansion of mainline
capacity, and the reserve reversals and favorable regulatory decisions,
partially offset by the effect of the 1995 approximately $11 million net effect
of two reserve accrual adjustments. One was a $16 million favorable adjustment
of rate refund accruals based on recent rate case developments. Partially
offsetting this was a loss accrual (included in other income--net) in connection
with a lawsuit involving a former transportation customer.
WILLIAMS NATURAL GAS' revenues increased $18.5 million, or 16 percent, due
primarily to the effect of the 1995 reversal of direct bill refund of gas
purchases of approximately $8 million, in addition to increased transportation
revenue of $12 million. The increase in transportation revenue is due primarily
to new tariff rates





12
14
ITEM 2.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations


that became effective August 1, 1995, and $6 million related to the collection
of gas supply realignment costs. Total throughput increased 3.2 TBtu, or 1
percent. Costs and operating expenses increased $15 million, or 27 percent,
due primarily to the effect of the 1995 reversal of direct bill refund of gas
purchases and the 1996 amortization of gas supply realignment costs. Operating
profit increased $4.4 million, or 15 percent, due primarily to new tariff rates
that became effective August 1, 1995.
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE'S revenues increased $37.2 million, or 7
percent, due primarily to a full year of operations in 1996 compared with 1995,
which reflected operations from January 18, 1995, when Williams acquired
majority interest in Transco Energy. Revenues associated with the period
January 1 through January 17, 1995, were $35.8 million. Revenues also
increased due to $20 million in higher transportation revenue, partially offset
by lower transportation costs charged to Transco by others and recovered in
Transco's rates. Transportation revenue increased due primarily to increased
throughput, which benefitted from a system expansion placed in service in late
1995, and new rates effective September 1, 1995, which allow the passthrough of
increased costs. Total throughput increased 165.8 TBtu, or 17 percent, due
primarily to a full year of operations in 1996 compared to a partial year in
1995. Operating profit increased $16 million, or 14 percent, due primarily to
a full year of operations in 1996, increased transportation revenue and lower
general and administrative expenses, partially offset by higher operation,
maintenance and depreciation expense. Because of its rate structure and
historical maintenance schedule, Transco typically experiences lower operating
profit in the second and third quarters as compared to the first and fourth
quarters of the year.
TEXAS GAS TRANSMISSION'S revenues and operating profit increased $33.5
million, or 18 percent, and $20.2 million, or 57 percent, respectively, due
primarily to new rates that became effective April 1, 1995, and an adjustment
to regulatory accruals based on a recent rate-case settlement. Also, the first
quarter of 1995 reflected operations from January 18, when Williams acquired
majority interest in Transco Energy. Revenues associated with the period
January 1 through January 17, 1995, were $16 million. Total throughput
increased 119.7 TBtu, or 26 percent, due primarily to a full year of operations
in 1996 compared to a partial year in 1995. Because of its rate structure,
Texas Gas typically experiences lower operating profits in the second and third
quarters as compared to the first and fourth quarters of the year.
KERN RIVER GAS TRANSMISSION'S (KERN RIVER) remaining interest was acquired
by Williams on January 16, 1996. Revenues and operating profit amounts for the
nine months ended September 30, 1996, include the operating results of Kern
River since the acquisition date. Kern River's revenues were $118.5 million
for the nine months of 1996, while costs and operating expenses were $26
million, selling, general and administrative expenses were $9 million and
operating profit was $83.7 million. Prior to the acquisition, Williams
accounted for its 50 percent ownership in Kern River using the equity method of
accounting, with its share of equity earnings recorded in investing income.
Equity earnings for the nine months of 1996 includes $2 million for the period
prior to the acquisition date, compared to $23 million for the first nine
months of 1995. Throughput was 199.6 TBtu for the nine months of 1996 (for the
period subsequent to the acquisition date). Throughput for the first nine
months of 1996 is comparable to 1995.
WILLIAMS FIELD SERVICES GROUP'S revenues increased $108.2 million, or 26
percent, due primarily to higher gathering, processing and natural gas liquids
sales revenues of $25 million, $11 million, and $37 million, respectively,
combined with increased natural gas sales volumes. Gathering, processing and
natural gas liquids volumes increased 26 percent, 25 percent and 40 percent,
respectively. Average natural gas liquids prices also increased while average
gathering rates decreased. Costs and expenses (excluding other income--net)
increased $71 million, or 22 percent, due primarily to increased natural gas
purchase volumes, expanded facilities and increased operations. Other
income--net for 1996 includes a $3 million environmental remediation accrual
offset by a $3 million gain from the sale of a small gathering system in the
Texas panhandle. Other income--net for 1995 includes $12 million in operating
profit from the net effect of two unrelated items. One was $20 million from
the favorable resolution of contingency issues involving previously regulated
gathering and processing assets. This was partially offset by an $8 million
loss accrual for a future minimum price natural gas purchase commitment.
Operating profit increased $24 million, or 21 percent, due primarily to
increased natural gas liquids margins and higher gathering and processing
revenues, partially offset by higher costs and operating expenses associated
with expanded facilities and increased operations and the 1995 $12 million net
effect of two unrelated items in other income--net.
WILLIAMS ENERGY SERVICES' revenues increased $9.3 million, or 14 percent,
due primarily to higher price-risk management revenues of $29 million,
partially offset by lower contract origination and natural gas physical trading
revenues of $16 million and $3 million, respectively. Natural gas physical
trading volumes increased 26 percent from 525 TBtu to 661 TBtu (an average of
2.4 Bcf/day), due primarily to increased trading activity in the west and mid-
continent regions. This volume increase was more than offset by lower physical
trading margins of $12 million. Operating profit increased $13.4 million, or
45 percent, due primarily to the increase in revenues combined with a reduction
of development costs associated with its information products business,
partially





13
15
ITEM 2.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations


offset by higher selling, general and administrative expenses.
WILLIAMS PIPE LINE'S (INCLUDING WILLIAMS ENERGY VENTURES) revenues increased
$162.3 million, or 74 percent, due primarily to an increase in
non-transportation revenue combined with a 10 percent increase in shipments.
Shipments increased due primarily to new business and the impact during 1995 of
unfavorable weather conditions and a November 1994 fire at a truck-loading rack.
Average length of haul and transportation rate per barrel decreased 3 percent
and 1 percent, respectively, due primarily to shorter haul movements. The
increase in non-transportation revenue is due primarily to Williams Energy
Ventures' ethanol sales following the August 1995 acquisition of Pekin Energy
and the fourth-quarter 1995 completion of the Nebraska Energy plant, combined
with higher product marketing and services revenues. Costs and expenses
increased $154 million, or 91 percent, due primarily to ethanol production
activities. Operating profit (including Williams Energy Ventures) increased $8.4
million, or 17 percent, due primarily to increased transportation revenue,
partially offset by the decision to suspend ethanol production to perform
efficiency maintenance on ethanol production plants during the third-quarter
1996, a period of record high corn prices. Williams Energy Ventures' operating
loss increased $4.8 million to $5.6 million. During the fourth-quarter 1996,
corn prices returned to more traditionally normal levels. In September 1996,
Williams Energy Ventures announced it had acquired a 45.5 percent interest in
eight petroleum products terminals in the Southeast, giving it a platform to
market services in the southeastern region of the country.
WILLIAMS COMMUNICATIONS GROUP'S revenues increased $97.1 million, or 25
percent, due primarily to $60 million from the acquisitions of Global Access
Telecommunications Services, ComLink, Inc., NUS Training, the teleports of ICG
Wireless Services, ITC mediaConferencing and SoftIRON Systems. Additionally,
increased business activity resulted in a $20 million revenue increase in new
systems and an $11 million revenue increase in digital fiber television
services. Billable minutes from occasional service and the number of ports in
service at September 30, 1996, each increased 11 percent compared to September
30, 1995. Costs and operating expenses increased $72 million, or 24 percent,
and selling, general and administrative expenses increased $36 million, or 49
percent, due primarily to the overall increase in business activity and higher
expenses for developing additional products and services, including the cost of
integrating the most recent acquisitions. Operating profit decreased $11
million, or 65 percent, due primarily to the expense of developing additional
products and services along with integrating the most recent acquisitions.
GENERAL CORPORATE EXPENSES increased $4.2 million, or 16 percent, due
primarily to higher employee compensation expense and professional services,
partially offset by the effect of a $4 million contribution in 1995 to The
Williams Companies Foundation. Interest accrued increased $61.4 million, or 30
percent, due primarily to higher borrowing levels including $643 million of
debt assumed with the acquisition of Kern River (see Note 3), slightly offset
by lower average interest rates. Interest capitalized decreased $6 million, or
57 percent, due primarily to lower capital expenditures for gathering and
processing facilities, in addition to the completion of a Northwest Pipeline
mainline expansion in 1995. Investing income decreased $66.5 million, or 82
percent, due primarily to the effect of a 1995 $15 million dividend from
Texasgulf Inc. and interest earned in 1995 on the invested portion of the cash
proceeds from the sale of Williams' network services operations, in addition to
$22 million lower equity earnings from Williams' 50 percent ownership in Kern
River. Kern River's 1996 operating results are included in operating profit
since the acquisition date (see Note 3). The 1995 loss on sale of investment
results from the sale of the 15 percent interest in Texasgulf Inc. (see Note
5). Other income (expense)--net in 1995 included $10 million for minority
interest expense associated with the Transco merger. The effective income tax
rate in 1996 is less than the federal statutory rate due primarily to income
tax credits from coal-seam gas production, partially offset by the effects of
state income taxes. In addition, 1996 includes recognition of favorable
adjustments totaling $16 million related to research credits, previously
provided deferred income taxes on certain regulated capital projects and state
income tax adjustments related to 1995. The effective income tax rate in 1995
was less than the federal statutory rate due primarily to income tax credits
from coal-seam gas production, partially offset by the effects of state income
taxes and minority interest. In addition, 1995 included the previously
unrecognized tax benefits related to the sale of Texasgulf Inc. (see Note 5)
and recognition of an $8 million income tax benefit resulting from settlements
with taxing authorities.
On January 5, 1995, Williams sold its network services operations to LDDS
Communications, Inc. for $2.5 billion in cash. The sale yielded an after-tax
gain of approximately $1 billion, which is reported as income from discontinued
operations (see Note 7).
Preferred stock dividends decreased $4.8 million, or 38 percent, due
primarily to the difference in the fair value of subordinated debentures issued
and the carrying value of the $2.21 cumulative preferred stock exchanged in
1995.

Financial Condition and Liquidity

Liquidity

Williams considers its liquidity to come from two sources: internal
liquidity, consisting of available cash





14
16
ITEM 2.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations


investments, and external liquidity, consisting of borrowing capacity from
available bank-credit facilities, which can be utilized without limitation
under existing loan covenants. At September 30, 1996, Williams had access to
$499 million of liquidity representing the available portion of its $800
million bank-credit facility plus cash-equivalent investments. This compares
with liquidity of $656 million at December 31, 1995, and $765 million at
September 30, 1995. The decrease in 1996 is due to additional borrowings under
the bank credit facility.
In 1996, capital expenditures (excluding acquisition of businesses) are
estimated to be approximately $800 million. During 1996, Williams expects to
finance capital expenditures, investments and working-capital requirements
through cash generated from operations, the use of its $800 million bank-credit
facility, or additional borrowings, which include public debt/equity offerings
and/or expanding committed borrowing facilities.

Financing Activities

On January 16, 1996, Williams acquired the remaining interest in Kern River
Gas Transmission Company for $206 million in cash and entered into a $205
million short-term borrowing agreement to finance the purchase (see Note 3).
For financial statement reporting purposes, $351 million of current debt
obligations have been classified as non-current obligations based on Williams'
intent and ability to refinance on a long-term basis. The amount available on
the $800 million credit agreement of $497 million is sufficient to complete
these refinancings.
The consolidated long-term debt to long-term debt-plus-equity ratio
increased to 55.3 percent at September 30, 1996, from 47.4 percent at December
31, 1995. The increase is due primarily to the assumption of Kern River's
debt, combined with the issuance of $250 million of debentures by Williams
Holdings under a $400 million shelf registration statement filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission in January 1996, and higher borrowings by
Williams Holdings under the bank-credit facility.
During March 1996, the Kern River floating-rate bank loan was refinanced
through the issuance of 6.42 percent and 6.72 percent fixed-rate notes.
Interest-rate swap agreements entered into by Kern River in prior years which
effectively converted floating-rate debt to a fixed 9.1 percent remain
outstanding. Concurrent with the refinancing, Kern River entered into
additional interest-rate swap agreements which effectively offset the original
interest-rate swaps and adjust the new fixed-rate notes to an effective
interest rate of 8.5 percent.
In April 1996, Williams Holdings entered into an interest-rate swap
agreement which effectively converted its 6.25 percent fixed-rate debentures to
floating-rate debt (4.66 percent at September 30, 1996).
During the third quarter of 1996, Williams began the open-market purchase
of its common stock. Purchases of 638,500 shares totaling $31 million were
completed by September 30, 1996. The Williams' board of directors has
authorized up to $800 million of such purchases.
The increase in receivables from December 31, 1995, is due primarily to
increased trading activities by Williams Energy Services. The increase in
property, plant and equipment primarily reflects the consolidation of Kern River
following the January 1996 acquisition. The increase in other assets and
deferred charges is due primarily to regulatory assets associated with debt and
the excess purchase price allocated to intangibles for businesses acquired by
Williams Communications Group.

Other

The Financial Accounting Standards Board has issued a new accounting
standard, FAS No. 123 "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," effective for
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 1995. As provided for in the
standard, Williams will not adopt the recognition provisions and will provide
the pro forma net income and earnings-per-share disclosures required by the
standard in its 1996 annual financial statements.
Williams currently follows Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25
"Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees." Under this standard, because the
exercise price of Williams' fixed-plan common stock options equals the market
price of the underlying stock on the date of the grant, no compensation is
recognized.





15
17
Part II. Other Information


Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

(a) The exhibits listed below are filed as part of this report:

Exhibit 3-- By-laws as amended on September 19, 1996

Exhibit 11--Computation of Earnings Per Common and
Common-equivalent Share

Exhibit 12--Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Combined
Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividend
Requirements

(b) During the third quarter of 1996, the Company filed a Form
8-K on July 21, 1996, which reported a significant event
under Item 5 of the Form and included the exhibits required
by Item 7 of the Form.


16
18

SIGNATURE


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.




THE WILLIAMS COMPANIES, INC.
---------------------------------
(Registrant)



Gary R. Belitz
---------------------------------
Gary R. Belitz
Controller
(Duly Authorized Officer and
Chief Accounting Officer)

November 14, 1996
19
INDEX TO EXHIBITS



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION
------- -----------
<S> <C>

Exhibit 3 --By-laws as amended on September 19, 1996

Exhibit 11--Computation of Earnings Per Common and Common-equivalent Share

Exhibit 12--Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and
Preferred Stock Dividend Requirements

Exhibit 27--Financial Data Schedule
</TABLE>