UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)
For the Quarterly Period ended June 30, 2013
Or
For the Transition Period from to
Commission file number: 001-33626
GENPACT LIMITED
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
Canon’s Court
22 Victoria Street
Hamilton HM 12
Bermuda
(441) 295-2244
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant’s principal executive office)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “accelerated filer”, “large accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
The number of the registrant’s common shares, par value $0.01 per share, outstanding as of July 31, 2013 was 229,587,199.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Item No.
PART I
Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2012 and June 30, 2013
Consolidated Statements of Income for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2013
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2013
Consolidated Statements of Equity for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2013
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2013
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Controls and Procedures
PART II
Legal Proceedings
Risk Factors
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Defaults upon Senior Securities
Other Information
Exhibits
SIGNATURES
Item 1. Financial Statements
GENPACT LIMITED AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share data and share count)
Assets
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents
Accounts receivable, net
Accounts receivable from related party, net
Short term deposits
Deferred tax assets
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
Total current assets
Property, plant and equipment, net
Investment in equity affiliates
Customer-related intangible assets, net
Marketing-related intangible assets, net
Other intangible assets, net
Goodwill
Other assets
Total assets
See accompanying notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
1
Liabilities and equity
Current liabilities
Short-term borrowings
Current portion of long-term debt
Current portion of capital lease obligations
Accounts payable
Income taxes payable
Deferred tax liabilities
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
Total current liabilities
Long-term debt, less current portion
Capital lease obligations, less current portion
Other liabilities
Total liabilities
Shareholders’ equity
Preferred shares, $0.01 par value, 250,000,000 authorized, none issued
Common shares, $0.01 par value, 500,000,000 authorized, 225,480,172 and 229,513,754 issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2012 and June 30, 2013, respectively
Additional paid-in capital
Retained earnings
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
Genpact Limited shareholders’ equity
Noncontrolling interest
Total equity
Commitments and contingencies
Total liabilities and equity
2
Consolidated Statements of Income
Net revenues
Net revenues from services – others
Net revenues from services – related party
Total net revenues
Cost of revenue
Services
Total cost of revenue
Gross profit
Operating expenses:
Selling, general and administrative expenses
Amortization of acquired intangible assets
Other operating (income) expense, net
Income from operations
Foreign exchange (gains) losses, net
Other income (expense), net
Income before Equity-method investment activity, net and income tax expense
Equity-method investment activity, net
Income before income tax expense
Income tax expense
Net Income
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
Net income attributable to Genpact Limited shareholders
Net income available to Genpact Limited common shareholders
Earnings per common share attributable to Genpact Limited common shareholders
Basic
Diluted
Weighted average number of common shares used in computing earnings per common share attributable to Genpact Limited common shareholders
3
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
(In thousands)
Other comprehensive income:
Currency translation adjustments
Net income (loss) on cash flow hedging derivatives, net of taxes (Note 7)
Other comprehensive income (loss)
Comprehensive income (loss)
4
Consolidated Statements of Equity
(In thousands, except share count)
Common shares
Balance as of January 1, 2012
Issuance of common shares on exercise of options (Note 11)
Issuance of common shares under the employee stock purchase plan (Note 11)
Net settlement on vesting of restricted share units (Note 11)
Distribution to noncontrolling interest
Stock-based compensation expense (Note 11)
Comprehensive income:
Net income
Other comprehensive income
Balance as of June 30, 2012
See accompanying notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
5
Balance as of January 1, 2013
Net settlement on vesting of performance units (Note 11)
Disposition of noncontrolling interest
Balance as of June 30, 2013
6
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Operating activities
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used for) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization
Amortization of debt issue costs (including loss on extinguishment of debt)
Reserve for doubtful receivables
Reserve for mortgage loans
Unrealized (gain) loss on revaluation of foreign currency asset/liability
Stock-based compensation expense
Deferred income taxes
Others, net
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
Increase in accounts receivable
Increase in other assets
Decrease in accounts payable
Decrease in accrued expenses and other current liabilities
Increase in income taxes payable
Increase in other liabilities
Net cash provided by operating activities
Investing activities
Purchase of property, plant and equipment
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment
Investment in affiliates
Short term deposits placed
Redemption of short term deposits
Payment for business acquisitions, net of cash acquired
Proceeds from divestiture of business, net of cash divested (refer note 3C(a))
Net cash used for investing activities
Financing activities
Repayment of capital lease obligations
Proceeds from long-term debt
Repayment of long-term debt
Proceeds from Short-term borrowings
Repayment of Short-term borrowings
Proceeds from issuance of common shares under stock based compensation plans
Payment for net settlement of stock based awards
Payment of earn-out consideration
Cost incurred in relation to debt amendment and refinancing
Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities
Effect of exchange rate changes
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period
Supplementary information
Cash paid during the period for interest
Cash paid during the period for income taxes
Property, plant and equipment acquired under capital lease obligation
7
1. Organization
Nature of Operations
The Company is a global leader in business process management and technology services, leveraging the power of smarter processes, smarter analytics and smarter technology to help its clients drive intelligence across the enterprise. The Company believes that its Smart Enterprise Processes (SEPSM) framework, its unique science of process combined with deep domain expertise in multiple industry verticals, leads to superior business outcomes. The Company’s Smart Decision Services deliver valuable business insights to its clients through targeted analytics, re-engineering expertise, and advanced risk management. Making technology more intelligent by embedding it with process and data insights, the Company also offers a wide range of technology services. Driven by a passion for process innovation and operational excellence built on its Lean and Six Sigma DNA and the legacy of serving GE for more than 15 years, its 60,000+ professionals around the globe deliver services to more than 700 clients from a network of 68 delivery centers across 18 countries supporting more than 30 languages.
Prior to December 30, 2004, the business of the Company was conducted through various entities and divisions of the General Electric Company (“GE”). On December 30, 2004, in a series of transactions referred to as the “2004 Reorganization”, GE transferred such operations to the Company. In August 2007, the Company completed an initial public offering of its common shares, pursuant to which the Company and certain of its existing shareholders each sold 17,647,059 common shares. On March 24, 2010, the Company completed a secondary offering of its common shares pursuant to which GE’s shareholding in the Company decreased to 9.1% and it ceased to be a significant shareholder, although it continued to be a related party. During the year ended December 31, 2012, GE’s shareholding subsequently declined to less than 5.0%, as a result of which GE is no longer considered a related party.
On December 14, 2012, a secondary offering of the Company’s common shares by General Atlantic (“GA”) and Oak Hill Capital Partners (“OH”) was completed. Upon the completion of the secondary offering, GA and OH each owned approximately 2.4% of the Company’s common shares outstanding, and they ceased to be significant shareholders and related parties.
2012 Recapitalization
On August 1, 2012, the Company announced that Glory Investments A Limited, formerly known as South Asia Private Investments and an affiliate of Bain Capital Investors, LLC (“Bain Capital”) had entered into an agreement to purchase approximately 67,750,678 common shares of the Company from affiliates of GA and OH for $14.76 per share, or approximately $1,000,000, after payment by the Company of a special cash dividend of $2.24 per share. The special cash dividend was declared by the Company’s board of directors on August 30, 2012, and paid on September 24, 2012 to holders of record as of September 10, 2012. On October 25, 2012, Bain Capital and its affiliated assignees completed the purchase of 57,537,264 common shares of the Company. As permitted under the share purchase agreement, two additional co-investors (RGIP, LLC, an investor in certain investment funds which are affiliated with Bain Capital, and Twickenham Investment Private Limited, an affiliate of the Government of Singapore Investment Corporation Private Limited) purchased the remaining 50,812 shares and 10,162,602 shares of the Company, respectively, covered by the share purchase agreement.
On August 30, 2012, the Company terminated its existing credit facility of $380,000 and entered into a new credit facility of $925,000, to repay the previous existing credit facility, fund a portion of the special cash dividend, pay fees and expenses in connection with the foregoing and to provide for general corporate purposes of the Company, including working capital requirements. Net proceeds from the credit facility along with cash on hand were partially used to fund the dividend payment of $2.24 per share, or $501,620 in the aggregate, which was paid on all issued and outstanding common shares. In accordance with the terms of the Company’s stock-based compensation plans, in order to preserve the value of stock-based awards outstanding as of the record date, the Company reduced the exercise price per share of each outstanding stock option award and increased the number of shares in relation to all outstanding stock-based awards as of the record date of the special cash dividend. This transaction, together with other related transactions, is referred to as the “2012 Recapitalization”. In June 2013, the Company amended its credit facility with the consortium of financial institutions as explained in Note 14.
The Company incurred expenses of approximately $23,464 for the 2012 Recapitalization excluding the fees associated with the previous existing credit facility and the new credit facility. Out of the total expenses of $23,464, $6,237 was incurred and recorded as a part of “selling, general and administrative expenses” in the Consolidated Statements of Income for the year ended December 31, 2012. The balance of the total expenses of approximately $17,227 relating to the share purchase transaction were incurred and accrued as of December 31, 2012 and reported as a part of “other income (expense), net” in the Consolidated Statements of Income for the year ended December 31, 2012. GA and OH, collectively, reimbursed $17,000 of the $17,227 to the Company on October 25, 2012 at the closing of the share purchase transaction in accordance with the letter agreement among the Company, GA and OH. This reimbursement was recorded as a part of “other income (expense), net” in the Consolidated Statements of Income for the year ended December 31, 2012.
8
2. Summary of significant accounting policies
(a) Basis of preparation and principles of consolidation
The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP) for interim financial information and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission for reporting on Form 10-Q. Accordingly, they do not include certain information and footnote disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles for annual financial reporting and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.
The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments that management considers necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations for these periods. The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year.
The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a consolidated basis and reflect the financial statements of Genpact Limited and all of its subsidiaries that are more than 50% owned and controlled. When the Company does not have a controlling interest in an entity, but exerts a significant influence on the entity, the Company applies the equity method of accounting. All inter-company transactions and balances are eliminated in consolidation.
The noncontrolling interest disclosed in the accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements represents the noncontrolling partners’ interest in the operation of Genpact Netherlands B.V. and the noncontrolling shareholders’ interest in the operation of Hello Communications (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. and the profits or losses associated with the noncontrolling interest in those operations. The noncontrolling partners of Genpact Netherlands B.V. are individually liable for the tax obligations on their shares of profit as it is a partnership and, accordingly, noncontrolling interest relating to Genpact Netherlands B.V. has been computed prior to tax and disclosed accordingly in the unaudited interim Consolidated Statements of Income.
(b) Use of estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements. Significant items subject to such estimates and assumptions include the useful lives of property, plant and equipment, the carrying amount of property, plant and equipment, intangibles and goodwill, the reserve for doubtful receivables, the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets, the valuation of derivative financial instruments, the measurements of stock-based compensation, assets and obligations related to employee benefits, income tax uncertainties and other contingencies. Management believes that the estimates used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements are reasonable. Although these estimates are based upon management’s knowledge of current events and actions, actual results could differ from these estimates. Any changes in estimates are adjusted prospectively in the consolidated financial statements.
(c) Business combinations, goodwill and other intangible assets
The Company accounts for its business combinations by recognizing the identifiable tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquired business, measured at their acquisition date fair values. Contingent consideration is included within the acquisition cost and is recognized at its fair value on the acquisition date. A liability resulting from contingent consideration is remeasured to fair value at each reporting date until the contingency is resolved. Changes in fair value are recognized in earnings. All assets and liabilities of the acquired businesses, including goodwill, are assigned to reporting units. Acquisition related costs are expensed as incurred under Selling, General and Administrative Expenses.
9
2. Summary of significant accounting policies (Continued)
Goodwill represents the cost of acquired businesses in excess of the fair value of identifiable tangible and intangible net assets purchased. Goodwill is not amortized but is tested for impairment at least on an annual basis on December 31, based on a number of factors including operating results, business plans and future cash flows. The Company performs an assessment of qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events or circumstances leads to a determination that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. Based on the assessment of events or circumstances, the Company performs the quantitative assessment of goodwill impairment if it determines that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If based on the quantitative impairment analysis the carrying value of the goodwill of the reporting unit exceeds the fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to the excess. In addition, the Company shall perform the qualitative assessment of Goodwill impairment between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below its carrying amount. See note 9 for information and related disclosures.
Intangible assets acquired individually or with a group of other assets or in a business combination are carried at cost less accumulated amortization based on their estimated useful lives as follows:
Customer-related intangible assets
Marketing-related intangible assets
Contract-related intangible assets
Other intangible assets
Intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives using a method of amortization that reflects the pattern in which the economic benefits of the intangible assets are consumed or otherwise realized.
In business combinations, where the fair value of identifiable tangible and intangible net assets purchased exceeds the cost of the acquired business, the Company recognizes the resulting gain under ‘Other operating (income) expense, net’ in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
(d) Financial instruments and concentration of credit risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentration of credit risk are reflected principally in cash and cash equivalents, short term deposits, derivative financial instruments and accounts receivable. The Company places its cash and cash equivalents and derivative financial instruments with corporations and banks with high investment grade ratings, limits the amount of credit exposure with any one corporation or bank and conducts ongoing evaluations of the credit worthiness of the corporations and banks with which it does business. To reduce its credit risk on accounts receivable, the Company conducts ongoing credit evaluations of customers. GE accounted for 30% and 26% of receivables as of December 31, 2012 and June 30, 2013, respectively. GE accounted for 27% and 23% of revenues for the six months and three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2013, respectively.
(e) Recently adopted accounting pronouncements
The authoritative bodies release standards and guidance which are assessed by management for impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
10
The following recently released accounting standard has been adopted by the Company and certain disclosures in the consolidated financial statements and notes to the consolidated financial statements have been modified accordingly. Adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the consolidated results of operations, cash flows, financial position or disclosures:
Effective January 1, 2013, the Company adopted FASB ASU 2013-02, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (“ASU 2013-02”). ASU 2013-02 amended existing guidance by requiring additional disclosure either on the face of the income statement or in the notes to the financial statements of significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income. ASU 2013-02 requires prospective adoption and affects financial statement disclosure only.
(f) Reclassification
Certain reclassifications have been made in the consolidated financial statements of prior periods to conform to the classification used in the current period.
11
3. Business acquisitions and divestitures
On March 28, 2013, the Company acquired the remaining 50% of the outstanding equity interest in NGEN Media Services Private Limited, a private limited company organized under the laws of India (“NGEN”), and thereby increased its interest from 50% to 100%, providing the Company control over NGEN as a wholly owned subsidiary. NGEN is engaged in the business of media services outsourcing.
The Company acquired the remaining 50% equity interest for cash consideration of $158. There are no contingent consideration arrangements in connection with the acquisition. The Company previously accounted for its 50% interest in NGEN as an equity method investment. The Company re-measured this equity interest to fair value at the acquisition date and recognized a loss of $5 in the Consolidated Statements of Income under “equity-method investment activity, net”.
The following table summarizes the consideration to acquire NGEN and the amounts of identified assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date, as well as the fair value of the Company’s existing investment in NGEN at the acquisition date:
Cash consideration
Acquisition date fair value of the Company’s investment in NGEN held before the business combination
Total
Recognized amounts of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed
Tangible fixed assets
Other non-current assets
Total identifiable net assets acquired
Gain recognized on acquisition
On February 6, 2013, the Company completed its acquisition of 100% of the outstanding membership interest in Jawood Business Process Solutions, LLC, a Michigan limited liability company (“Jawood”) for cash consideration of $51,000, subject to adjustment based on closing date net working capital, indebtedness and cash and cash equivalents. There are no contingent consideration arrangements in connection with the acquisition of Jawood.
The transaction also included acquisition of 100% of the outstanding shares of Felix Software Solutions Private Limited, a company organized under the laws of India (“Felix”), for cash consideration of $2,295, subject to adjustment based on closing date net working capital. There are no contingent consideration arrangements in connection with the acquisition of Felix.
Jawood and Felix (collectively referred to as the “Jawood business”) are, respectively, US and India based providers of business consulting and information technology services to the healthcare payer industry. Felix is a key sub-contractor to Jawood. This transaction strengthens the Company’s solutions and services offerings in the healthcare payer market.
12
3. Business acquisitions (Continued)
Pursuant to the terms of the acquisition agreements with the respective sellers, the preliminary estimated purchase consideration for the Jawood business is comprised of the following:
Base purchase price
Estimated closing date net working capital adjustment
Estimated closing date indebtedness adjustment
Estimated closing date cash adjustment
Estimated seller expenses
Total preliminary estimated purchase price
The acquisition of the Jawood business has been accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting in accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations. The assets and liabilities of the Jawood business are recorded at fair value at the date of acquisition. The following table summarizes the allocation of the preliminary estimated purchase price based on the fair value of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition:
Preliminary estimated purchase price
Acquisition related costs included in selling, general and administrative expenses
Intangible assets
Long term liabilities
As of the date of these financial statements, the purchase consideration is pending final adjustment for closing date net working capital, indebtedness and cash in accordance with the terms of the acquisition agreement and may result in a corresponding adjustment to goodwill during the measurement period. The measurement period will not exceed one year from the acquisition date. The total amount paid by the Company to acquire the Jawood business, net of cash acquired of $1,364, a holdback amount of $2,000 pursuant to the acquisition agreement, and seller expenses amounting to $1,379, is $46,301.
Goodwill representing the excess of the preliminary estimated purchase price over the net assets acquired is deductible for tax purposes to the extent of $33,830, and has been allocated to the India reporting unit. The amortizable intangible assets are being amortized over their estimated useful lives using a method of amortization that reflects the expected pattern in which the economic benefits of the intangible assets will be consumed or otherwise realized. The value and estimated useful lives of the intangible assets are follows:
Customer related intangible assets
Marketing related intangible assets
The weighted average amortization period in respect of the acquired intangible assets is 6 years.
The results of operations of the Jawood business and the fair value of the assets and liabilities are included in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements with effect from February 6, 2013, the date of acquisition.
13
On September 4, 2012, the Company acquired 100% of the outstanding common and preferred stock of Atyati Technologies Private Limited, an Indian private limited company (“Atyati”), a cloud-hosted technology platform provider for the rural banking sector in India. This acquisition gives the Company a platform-based banking solution for the rural and semi-rural consumer market.
The Company acquired Atyati for an initial cash consideration of $19,368 subject to adjustment based on the closing date final working capital amount. The acquisition agreement also provided for additional deferred consideration which had a discounted value of $2,539 and earn-out consideration (ranging from $0 to $14,372 based on gross profit for the year ending March 31, 2014) which had an estimated fair value of $1,487.
As of the date of these financial statements, the purchase consideration for the acquisition is pending adjustment for the final working capital amount and may result in a corresponding adjustment to goodwill during the measurement period. The measurement period will not exceed one year from the acquisition date. Pursuant to the terms of the acquisition agreement with the sellers, the preliminary estimated purchase consideration is comprised of the following:
Acquisition date discounted value of deferred consideration
Acquisition date fair value of earn-out consideration
Estimated working capital adjustment
During the period ended June 30, 2013, the Company recorded a measurement period adjustment which resulted in a decrease in the deferred tax asset of $827, an increase in other non-current assets of $194 and an increase in goodwill of $633. The measurement period adjustments did not have a significant impact on our consolidated statements of income, balance sheets or cash flows in any period and, thus, were recorded in the consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2013.
The acquisition has been accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting in accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations. The assets and liabilities of Atyati were recorded at fair value at the date of acquisition. The following table summarizes the preliminary allocation of the preliminary estimated purchase price based on the fair value of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition:
Deferred tax asset/ (liability), net
Short term borrowings
Goodwill recorded in connection with the Atyati acquisition amounted to $13,939, representing the excess of the preliminary estimated purchase price over the net assets (including deferred taxes) acquired, has been allocated to the India reporting unit and is not deductible for tax purposes. The amortizable intangible assets are being amortized over their estimated useful lives using a method of amortization that reflects the pattern in which the economic benefits of the intangible assets are consumed or otherwise realized.
14
The value and estimated useful lives of the intangibles are as follows:
Customer related intangibles
Other intangibles
The weighted average amortization period in respect of the acquired intangible assets is 7 years. The results of operations of Atyati and the fair value of its assets and liabilities are included in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements with effect from September 4, 2012, the date of acquisition.
On August 17, 2012, the Company acquired 100% of the outstanding equity interest in Triumph Engineering, Corp. and Triumph On-Demand Inc., both Ohio corporations (collectively the “Triumph Companies”). The Triumph Companies are U.S. based Providers of engineering services to the aviation, energy, and oil and gas industries. This acquisition provides the Company with capabilities in the engineering services space.
The Company acquired the Triumph Companies for initial cash consideration of $3,600, subject to adjustment based on working capital and closing indebtedness. The acquisition agreement provided for additional deferred consideration which had a discounted value of $379, and earn-out consideration (ranging from $0 to $4,500 based on gross profit for the years ending December 31, 2013 and 2014) which had an estimated fair value of $3,256.
Pursuant to the terms of the acquisition agreement with the seller, the purchase consideration is comprised of the following:
Acquisition date fair value of deferred consideration
Working capital adjustment
Closing indebtedness adjustment
Total purchase price
During the period ended June 30, 2013, the Company recorded a measurement period adjustment which resulted in a decrease in the purchase consideration of $13 with a corresponding change to goodwill.
The acquisition has been accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting in accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations. The assets and liabilities of the Triumph Companies were recorded at fair value at the date of acquisition. The following table summarizes the allocation of the purchase price based on the fair value of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition:
Purchase price
Short term borrowing
15
Goodwill recorded in connection with the acquisition of the Triumph Companies amounted to $4,504, representing the excess of the purchase price over the net assets (including deferred taxes) acquired, has been allocated to the India reporting unit and is not deductible for tax purposes. The amortizable intangible assets are being amortized over their estimated useful lives using a method of amortization that reflects the pattern in which the economic benefits of the intangible assets are consumed or otherwise realized. The value and estimated useful lives of the intangibles are as follows:
The weighted average amortization period in respect of the acquired intangible assets is 8 years. The results of operations of the Triumph Companies and the fair value of the assets and liabilities are included in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements with effect from August 17, 2012, the date of acquisition.
(e) Accounting Plaza B.V.
On April 25, 2012, the Company acquired 100% of the outstanding equity interest in Accounting Plaza B.V., a private limited liability company organized under the laws of the Netherlands (“Accounting Plaza”). Accounting Plaza is a provider of finance and accounting, human resources and PeopleSoft ERP services. This acquisition strengthens the Company’s domain expertise in the retail industry and significantly expands its presence in Europe.
The Company acquired Accounting Plaza for cash consideration of $38,698 subject to adjustments based on transfer of pension funds, underfunding in pension funds, and sellers warranty breaches including certain other transactions and transaction costs. There are no contingent consideration arrangements in connection with the acquisition.
Pursuant to the terms of the acquisition agreement with the sellers, the purchase consideration is comprised of the following:
Initial consideration
Adjustment for transfer of pension funds
Adjustment for underfunding in pension funds
Adjustment for sellers warranty breaches and certain other transactions
Adjustment for transaction costs
Purchase consideration
The acquisition has been accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting in accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations. The assets and liabilities of Accounting Plaza were recorded at fair value as of the date of acquisition. The following table summarizes the allocation of the purchase consideration based on the fair value of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed as of the date of acquisition:
16
The fair value of the current assets acquired included trade receivables with a fair value of $9,744. The gross amount due was $9,917, of which $173 was expected to be uncollectable.
During the period ended March 31, 2013, the Company recorded a measurement period adjustment which resulted in an increase in the purchase consideration by $107 with a corresponding increase in goodwill. The measurement period adjustments did not have a significant impact on our consolidated statements of income, balance sheets or cash flows in any period and, thus, were recorded in the consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2013.
Goodwill representing the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net assets (including deferred taxes) acquired is not deductible for tax purposes and has been allocated to the Europe reporting unit.
The amortizable intangible assets acquired are being amortized over their estimated useful lives using a method of amortization that reflects the pattern in which the economic benefits of the intangible assets are consumed or otherwise realized. The value and estimated useful life of the intangible asset is as follows:
Customer related intangible
The weighted average amortization period in respect of the acquired intangible assets is 7 years. The results of operations of Accounting Plaza and the fair value of the assets and liabilities are included in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements with effect from April 25, 2012, the date of acquisition.
The Company acquired Akritiv Technologies, Inc. (“Akritiv”), High Performance Partners, LLC (“HPP”), Empower Research, LLC (“Empower”), Atyati and the Triumph Companies on March 14, 2011, August 24, 2011, October 3, 2011, September 4, 2012 and August 17, 2012, respectively. The terms of the acquisition agreements for these business acquisitions provided for payment of additional earn-out consideration if certain future events or conditions are met. These earn-outs were recorded as liabilities based on their fair values as of the acquisition dates. The Company evaluates the fair value of earn-out consideration for the respective acquisitions for changes at each reporting period. As of June 30, 2013, the Company re-measured the fair value of such earn-out consideration with corresponding changes in the Consolidated Statements of Income as follows:
Decrease in fair value of earn-out consideration for Empower
Decrease in fair value of earn-out consideration for Triumph Companies
Decrease in fair value of earn-out consideration for Atyati
Further, during the period ended June 30, 2013, the Company paid earn-out consideration of $85, $3,274 and $565 for HPP, Akritiv and Empower, respectively due to the fulfillment of certain earn-out conditions set forth in the acquisition agreements. Additionally, during the period ended June 30, 2013, the Company also paid deferred consideration of $617 to the Empower sellers pursuant to the terms of the acquisition agreement.
On February 22, 2013, the Company completed the divestiture of Hello Communications (Shanghai) Co. Ltd., a subsidiary engaged in the business of providing offshore tele-sales and other voice-based support services to telecom carriers and IT/telecom equipment manufacturers in Asia for cash consideration of $998 resulting in loss of $447. The expected loss on sale was recorded within other income (expense), net in the Consolidated Statements of Income for the year ended December 31, 2012 and was not materially different from the actual realized loss. The balance of cash and cash equivalents of Hello Communications (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. on the date of sale was $2,047, resulting in a net cash outflow of $1,049. The results of operations of Hello Communications (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. are not material to the Company’s results of operations or financial condition and, therefore, are not reflected as discontinued operations for the periods presented.
During the period ended June 30, 2013, the Company decided to divest or discontinue Clearbizz, B.V., a subsidiary engaged in the business of providing electronic invoicing services in the Netherlands. An amount of $1,325 has been reserved within other income (expense), net in the Consolidated Statements of Income representing the estimated loss on the said transaction. The results of operations of Clearbizz B.V. are not material to the Company’s results of operations or financial condition and, therefore, are not reflected as discontinued operations for the periods presented.
17
During the period ended June 30, 2013, the Company decided to divest or discontinue Gantthead.com, Inc., a subsidiary engaged in the business of operating an online technology portal for project management. An amount of $2,336 has been reserved within other income (expense), net in the Consolidated Statements of Income representing estimated loss on the expected divestiture of Gantthead.com, Inc.. The results of operations of Gantthead.com, Inc. are not material to the Company’s results of operations or financial condition and, therefore, are not reflected as discontinued operations for the periods presented.
4. Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2012 and June 30, 2013 comprise:
Deposits with banks
Other cash and bank balances
The cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2012 and June 30, 2013 include restricted cash balances of $628 and $826, respectively. Restrictions primarily consist of margin balances against bank guarantees and deposits for foreign currency advances on which the bank has created a lien.
5. Accounts receivable, net of reserve for doubtful receivables
The following table provides details of the reserve for doubtful receivables as recorded by the Company:
Opening balance as at January 1
Additions due to acquisitions
Additions charged to cost and expense
Deductions
Closing balance
Accounts receivable were $461,062 and $486,959 and the reserves for doubtful receivables were $9,073 and $12,194, resulting in net accounts receivable balances of $451,989 and $474,765 as of December 31, 2012 and June 30, 2013, respectively. In addition, accounts receivable due after one year of $19,140 and $19,180 as of December 31, 2012 and June 30, 2013, respectively are included under other assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Accounts receivable from related parties were $64 and $63, and the reserve for doubtful receivables were $35 and $0, resulting in net accounts receivable balances of $29 and $63, as of December 31, 2012 and June 30 2013, respectively.
18
6. Fair Value Measurements
The Company measures certain financial assets and liabilities, including derivative instruments, at fair value on a recurring basis. The fair value measurements of these derivative instruments were determined using the following inputs as of December 31, 2012 and June 30, 2013:
Derivative Instruments (Note a)
Liabilities
Derivative Instruments (Note b)
The following table sets forth the reconciliation of loans held for sale that were outstanding as of June 30, 2012 but settled during the year ended December 31, 2012, which were measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs:
Opening balance, net
Impact of fair value included in earnings
Settlements
Closing balance, net
The Company values its derivative instruments based on market observable inputs including both forward and spot prices for respective currencies. The quotes are taken from an independent market database.
19
7. Derivative financial instruments
The Company is exposed to the risk of rate fluctuations on foreign currency assets and liabilities, and foreign currency denominated forecasted cash flows. The Company has established risk management policies, including the use of derivative financial instruments to hedge foreign currency assets and liabilities, and foreign currency denominated forecasted cash flows. These derivative financial instruments are largely deliverable and non-deliverable forward foreign exchange contracts. The Company enters into these contracts with counterparties which are banks or other financial institutions, and the Company considers the risk of non-performance by the counterparties to be not material. The forward foreign exchange contracts mature between zero and forty-two months and the forecasted transactions are expected to occur during the same period.
The following table presents the aggregate notional principal amounts of outstanding derivative financial instruments together with the related balance sheet exposure:
Foreign exchange forward contracts denominated in:
United States Dollars (sell) Indian Rupees (buy)
United States Dollars (sell) Mexican Peso (buy)
United States Dollars (sell) Philippines Peso (buy)
Euro (sell) United States Dollars (buy)
Euro (sell) Hungarian Forints (buy)
Euro (sell) Romanian Leu (buy)
Japanese Yen (sell) Chinese Renminbi (buy)
Pound Sterling (sell) United States Dollars (buy)
Australian Dollars (sell) United States Dollars (buy)
FASB guidance on Derivatives and Hedging requires companies to recognize all derivative instruments as either assets or liabilities at fair value in the statement of financial position. In accordance with the FASB guidance on Derivatives and Hedging, the Company designates foreign exchange forward contracts as cash flow hedges for forecasted revenues and the purchase of services. In addition to this program, the Company has derivative instruments that are not accounted for as hedges under the FASB guidance in order to hedge the foreign exchange risks related to balance sheet items such as receivables and inter-company borrowings denominated in currencies other than the underlying functional currency.
The fair value of the derivative instruments and their location in the financial statements of the Company is summarized in the table below:
20
7. Derivative financial instruments (Continued)
Cash flow hedges
For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of the gain (loss) on the derivative instrument is reported as a component of other comprehensive income (loss) and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction is recognized in the consolidated statements of income. Gains (losses) on the derivatives representing either hedge ineffectiveness or hedge components excluded from the assessment of effectiveness are recognized in earnings as incurred.
In connection with cash flow hedges, the gains (losses) recorded as a component of other comprehensive income (loss) or OCI and the related tax affect are summarized below:
Opening balance
Net gains (losses) reclassified into statement of income on completion of hedged transactions
Changes in fair value of effective portion of outstanding derivatives, net
Gain (loss) on cash flow hedging derivatives, net
Closing balance as of June 30
21
The gains or losses recognized in other comprehensive income (loss), and their effect on financial performance are summarized below:
Derivatives in Cash FlowHedging Relationships
Location of Gain (Loss)reclassified from OCI intoStatement of Income(Effective Portion)
Location of Gain (Loss)recognized in Income onDerivatives (IneffectivePortion and Amount excludedfrom Effectiveness Testing)
Forward foreign exchange contracts
22
Non designated Hedges
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
Location of (Gain) Lossrecognized in Statementof Income on Derivatives
Forward foreign exchange contracts (Note a)
8. Property, plant and equipment, net
Property, plant and equipment, net consist of the following:
Property, plant and equipment, gross
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization
Depreciation expense on property, plant and equipment for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2013 was $22,422, and $23,417, respectively, and for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2013 was $11,316 and $11,984, respectively. The amount of computer software amortization for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2013 was $5,958, and $5,103, respectively and for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2013 was $2,987 and $2,546, respectively.
The above depreciation and amortization expense includes the effect of reclassification of foreign exchange (gains) losses related to the effective portion of the foreign currency derivative contracts amounting to $235 and $1,202 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2013, respectively, and $312 and $791 for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2013, respectively.
23
9. Goodwill and intangible assets
The following table presents the changes in goodwill for the year ended December 31, 2012 and six months ended June 30, 2013:
Goodwill relating to acquisitions consummated during the period
Adjustment to preliminary purchase accounting for acquisitions
Effect of exchange rate fluctuations
The total amount of goodwill deductible for tax purposes is $6,779 and $39,139 as of December 31, 2012 and June 30, 2013, respectively.
The Company’s intangible assets acquired either individually or with a group of other assets or in a business combination are as follows:
Amortization expenses for intangible assets as disclosed in the consolidated statements of income under amortization of acquired intangible assets for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2013 were $11,080 and $11,736, respectively, and for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2013 were $5,790 and $6,185, respectively. Intangible assets recorded for the 2004 Reorganization include the incremental value of the minimum volume commitment from GE, entered into contemporaneously with the 2004 Reorganization, over the value of the pre-existing customer relationship with GE. The amortization of this intangible asset for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2013 was $38 and $0, respectively, and for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2013 was $18 and $0, respectively, and has been reported as a reduction of revenue.
24
10. Employee benefit plans
The Company has employee benefit plans in the form of certain statutory and other schemes covering its employees.
Defined benefit plans
In accordance with Indian law, the Company provides a defined benefit retirement plan (the “Gratuity Plan”) covering substantially all of its Indian employees. In addition, in accordance with Mexican law, the Company provides termination benefits to all of its Mexican employees. In addition, some of the Company’s subsidiaries in the Philippines and Japan have sponsored defined benefit retirement programs.
Net defined benefit plan costs for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2013 include the following components:
Service costs
Interest costs
Amortization of actuarial loss
Expected return on plan assets
Net Gratuity Plan costs
Defined contribution plans
During the three months and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2013, the Company contributed the following amounts to defined contribution plans in various jurisdictions:
India
U.S.
U.K.
Hungary
China
Mexico
Morocco
South Africa
Hong Kong
Philippines
Singapore
Netherlands
Japan
25
11. Stock-based compensation
The Company has issued options under the Genpact Global Holdings 2005 Plan (the “2005 Plan”), Genpact Global Holdings 2006 Plan (the “2006 Plan”), Genpact Global Holdings 2007 Plan (the “2007 Plan”) and Genpact Limited 2007 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan (the “2007 Omnibus Plan”) to eligible persons who are employees, directors and certain other persons associated with the Company.
From the date of adoption of the 2007 Omnibus Plan on July 13, 2007, the options forfeited, expired, terminated, or cancelled under any of the plans will be added to the number of shares otherwise available for grant under the 2007 Omnibus Plan. The 2007 Omnibus Plan was amended and restated on April 11, 2012 to increase the number of common shares authorized for issuance by 5,593,200 shares to 15,000,000 shares.
On August 30, 2012, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a special cash dividend of $2.24 per share. The special cash dividend resulted in an adjustment to stock-based awards under both the 2007 Omnibus Plan and the 2005 Plan. Accordingly, effective September 24, 2012, the payment date of the special cash dividend, the number of common shares authorized for issuance under the 2007 Omnibus Plan was increased by 2,544,327 shares. The number of common shares authorized for issuance under the 2005 Plan was increased by 495,915 shares.
Further, as of December 31, 2012, the number of common shares authorized for issuance under the 2007 Omnibus Plan had been increased by 6,314,496 shares as a result of the termination, expiration or forfeiture of options granted under the Company’s stock incentive plans other than the 2007 Omnibus Plan. In accordance with the anti-dilutive provisions of the 2005 Plan, 2006 Plan, 2007 Plan and 2007 Omnibus Plan, the Company adjusted both the exercise price and the number of stock based awards outstanding as of the record date of the special cash dividend. The aggregate fair value, intrinsic value and the ratio of the exercise price to the market price were approximately equal immediately before and after the adjustments. Therefore, in accordance with the equity restructuring guidance under ASC 718, Compensation-Stock Compensation, no incremental compensation expense was recognized for the adjustment to the outstanding stock-based awards as a result of the special cash dividend.
The stock-based compensation costs relating to the foregoing plans during the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2013 were $17,166 and $16,503 respectively, and for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2013, were $9,941 and $ 10,022 respectively. These costs have been allocated to cost of revenue and selling, general, and administrative expenses.
The following table shows the significant assumptions used in connection with the determination of the fair value of options granted in the six months ended June 30, 2013. No options were granted in the six months ended June 30, 2012.
Dividend Yield
Expected life (in months)
Risk free rate of interest
Volatility
26
11. Stock-based compensation (continued)
A summary of option activity during the six months ended June 30, 2013 is set out below:
Outstanding as of January 1, 2013
Granted
Forfeited
Expired
Exercised
Outstanding as of June 30, 2013
Vested as of June 30, 2013 and expected to vest thereafter (a)
Vested and Exercisable as of June 30, 2013
Weighted average grant date fair value of grants during the period
As of June 30, 2013, the total remaining unrecognized stock-based compensation costs for options expected to vest amounted to $28,314, which will be recognized over the weighted average remaining requisite vesting period of 4.11 years.
Restricted Share Units
The Company has granted restricted share units, or RSUs, under the 2007 Omnibus Plan. Each RSU represents the right to receive one common share. The fair value of each RSU is the market price of one common share of the Company on the date of grant. The RSUs granted to date have vesting schedules of one to four years. The compensation expense is recognized on a straight line basis over the vesting term.
A summary of RSUs granted during the six months ended June 30, 2013 is set out below:
Vested*
Expected to vest (a)
During the year ended December 31, 2011, 102,000 RSUs vested, the shares in respect of which were issued in January 2013 (100,800 shares, net of minimum statutory withholding taxes). Shares in respect of an additional 13,719 RSUs reflecting an adjustment to 102,000 vested RSUs on account of the special cash dividend were issued in January 2013 (13,557 after withholding shares to the extent of minimum statutory withholding taxes).
27
As of December 31, 2012, 4,000 RSUs vested, the shares in respect of which were issued in April 2013 (1,819, net of minimum statutory withholding taxes). Shares in respect of an additional 533 RSUs reflecting an adjustment to 4,000 vested RSUs on account of the special cash dividend were issued in April 2013 (240, net of minimum statutory withholding taxes).
44,286 RSUs vested as of December 31, 2012, the shares in respect of which will be issued on December 31, 2013, after withholding shares to the extent of the minimum statutory withholding taxes.
567 RSUs vested as of June 30, 2013, the shares in respect of which will be issued in July 2013, net of minimum statutory withholding taxes.
As of June 30, 2013, the total remaining unrecognized stock-based compensation costs related to RSUs amounted to $14,241, which will be recognized over the weighted average remaining requisite vesting period of 2.08 years.
Performance Units
The Company also grants stock-based awards in the form of Performance Units, or PUs, under the 2007 Omnibus Plan.
The Company granted PUs, each of which represents the right to receive one common share based on the Company’s performance against specified targets. PUs granted to date have vesting schedules of six months to three years. The fair value of each PU is the market price of one common share of the Company on the date of grant, and assumes that performance targets will be achieved. The PUs granted under the plan are subject to cliff or graded vesting. For awards with cliff vesting, the compensation expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting terms. For awards with graded vesting, the compensation expense is recognized over the vesting term of each separately vesting portion. Over the performance period, the number of shares that will be issued will be adjusted upward or downward based upon the probability of achievement of the performance targets. The ultimate number of shares issued and the related compensation cost recognized as an expense will be based on a comparison of the final performance metrics to the specified targets.
A summary of PU activity during the six months ended June 30, 2013 is set out below:
Vested
Addition due to achievement of higher than target performance goals*
Reduction due to achievement of lower than maximum performance goals**
28
11. Stock-based compensation (Continued)
For the PUs granted in August 2010, vesting for the year ended December 31, 2011 (including the PUs issued as an adjustment on account of the special cash dividend) has taken place at 128.9% of the target shares (243,781 vested shares) after the compensation committee’s certification of the achievement of the performance goals. Shares in respect of these PUs were issued in January 2013 (156,511, net of minimum statutory withholding taxes).
The PUs granted in March 2010 (including the PUs issued as an adjustment on account of the special cash dividend) vested at 90.9% of the target shares (503,969 shares) after the compensation committee’s certification of the performance goals achieved for the performance period based on the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements. The shares in respect of these PUs were issued in March 2013 (334,922) and April 2013 (4,679), net of minimum statutory withholding taxes.
For the PUs granted in August 2010 vesting for the year ended December 31, 2012 has taken place at 122.2% of the target shares (231,029 vested shares) based on the compensation committee’s certification of achievement of the performance goals for the performance period based on the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements. The shares in respect of these PUs will be issued on December 31, 2013, net of minimum statutory withholding taxes.
As of June 30, 2013, the total remaining unrecognized stock-based compensation costs related to PUs amounted to $34,889, which will be recognized over the weighted average remaining requisite vesting period of 2.08 years.
In the first quarter of 2011, the compensation committee of the board of directors of the Company modified the performance metrics for the performance grants made to employees in 2010 from Revenue and EBITDA growth to revenue and adjusted operating income growth.
Outstanding
Target
Threshold
For the August 2010 performance grant to the Company’s former CEO, who assumed the role of Non-Executive Vice-Chairman as of June 17, 2011, in addition to the modification made to the performance metrics from revenue and EBITDA growth to revenue and adjusted operating income growth, because the award vests based on annual performance targets whereas the awards to other employees vest based on average performance over three years, revision has been made to the performance targets in order to make the performance targets consistent with performance unit grants made to other employees in the first quarter of 2011.
As of the date of the above modifications, an incremental compensation cost of $4,109 was determined and was to be recognized over a period of 21.5 months, starting from March 2011 to December 31, 2012.
29
Under the 2007 Omnibus Plan, the definition of change of control includes the acquisition by any person, corporation or other entity or group other than GA, OH, GE or any of their affiliates of 25% or more of the voting securities of the Company. The purchase by Bain Capital of Company shares from GA and OH would have been a change of control under the 2007 Omnibus Plan resulting in (1) accelerated vesting of the PUs granted in August 2010 to the former CEO (who since assumed the role of Non-Executive Vice-Chairman) and the PUs granted to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer in June 2011 and March 2012 and (2) “double-trigger” vesting of the outstanding PUs granted in March 2010 and March 2011 based on an abbreviated performance period ending with the close of the Company’s fiscal quarter coincident with or immediately preceding the effective date of the Change of Control in the event of a termination without cause in the twenty-four months following a change of control and (3) “double-trigger” vesting of the outstanding PUs granted in March 2012 based on target performance in the event of a termination without cause in the twenty-four months following a change of control. Because the Board of Directors determined that the Bain transaction was not the type of transaction intended to constitute a change of control, they amended the 2007 Omnibus Plan to provide that the contemplated transaction among Bain Capital, GA and OH would not constitute a change of control thereunder. In addition, the CEO and Non-Executive Vice-Chairman waived any accelerated vesting of their PUs and the impacted employees consented to the amendment of the change of control definition. As a result of the foregoing, all PUs will continue to vest in accordance with their original terms.
This amendment to the 2007 Omnibus Plan was a modification to the PUs effective as of October 25, 2012. Grants to 123 employees were affected by this modification and an incremental compensation cost of $5,500 was determined and will be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.85 years. The incremental compensation cost due to this modification was a result of considering the original performance period for determination of expected vesting compared to the abbreviated performance period for 2010 and 2011 grants and vesting at target for 2012 performance grants.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP)
On May 1, 2008, the Company adopted the Genpact Limited U.S. Employee Stock Purchase Plan and the Genpact Limited International Employee Stock Purchase Plan (together, the “ESPP”).
The ESPP allows eligible employees to purchase the Company’s common shares through payroll deduction at 90% of the fair value per share on the last business day of each purchase interval. The dollar amount of common shares purchased under the ESPP shall not exceed the greater of 15% of the participating employee’s base salary or $25 per calendar year. With effect from September 1, 2009, the offering periods commence on the first business day in March, June, September and December of each year and end on the last business day in the subsequent May, August, November and February of each year. 4,200,000 common shares have been reserved for issuance in the aggregate over the term of the ESPP.
During the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2013, common shares issued under the ESPP were 44,916 and 53,671, respectively.
The ESPP was considered non-compensatory under the FASB guidance on Compensation-Stock Compensation through the purchase interval ending on or prior to August 31, 2009. As a result of the change in the discount rate, the ESPP is being considered compensatory with effect from September 1, 2009.
The compensation expense for the employee stock purchase plan is recognized in accordance with the FASB guidance on Compensation-Stock Compensation. The compensation expense for ESPP during the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2013, were $77 and $116, respectively, and for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2013, were $39 and $71 respectively, and has been allocated to cost of revenue and selling, general, and administrative expenses.
30
12. Earnings per share
The Company calculates earnings per share in accordance with FASB guidance on Earnings per share. Basic and diluted earnings per common share give effect to the change in the number of common shares of the Company. The calculation of earnings per common share was determined by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the respective periods. The potentially dilutive shares, consisting of outstanding options on common shares, restricted share units, common shares to be issued under ESPP and performance units, have been included in the computation of diluted earnings per share and the weighted average shares outstanding, except where the result would be anti-dilutive.
The number of stock options outstanding but not included in the computation of diluted earnings per common share because the effect was anti-dilutive is 6,407,134 and 1,749,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2013, respectively, and is 6,246,826 and 3,483,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2013, respectively.
Weighted average number of common shares used in computing basic earnings per common share
Dilutive effect of stock based awards
Weighted average number of common shares used in computing dilutive earnings per common share
13. Short-term borrowings
The Company has the following borrowing facilities:
31
14. Long-term debt
In May 2011, the Company obtained credit facilities aggregating $380,000 from a consortium of financial institutions to finance in part the acquisition of Headstrong and for general corporate purposes of the Company and its subsidiaries, including working capital requirements. The credit agreement provided for a $120,000 term loan and a $260,000 revolving credit facility. On August 30, 2012, the Company fully prepaid and terminated the $ 380,000 credit facility
In August 2012, the Company obtained credit facilities aggregating $925,000 from a consortium of financial institutions to (i) finance the repayment of the balance outstanding under the previous existing credit facility of $380,000, (ii) fund a portion of the special cash dividend, and (iii) for general corporate purposes of the Company and its subsidiaries, including working capital requirements. The credit agreement provided for a term loan of $675,000 and a revolving credit facility of $250,000.
In June 2013, the Company amended this credit facility with the consortium of financial institutions. Under the amended facility, applicable margin on the term loan and revolving credit facility has been reduced from 3.25% p.a. to 2.75% p.a. and 2.50% p.a. respectively. In addition, the LIBOR floor on the term loan was reduced from 1% under the earlier facility to 0.75% under the amended credit facility. As of the amendment date, the gross outstanding term loan amounted to $671,625. The amendment did not result in a substantial modification of $553,589 of the outstanding term loan under the previous credit facility. Further, as a result of the amendment, the Company extinguished the outstanding term loan under the previous credit facility amounting to $118,036 and obtained additional funding amounting to $121,410, increasing the total term loan outstanding to $675,000. As a result, the Company expensed $3,103 representing partial acceleration of the amortization of the existing unamortized debt issuance costs and an additional fee paid to lenders in respect of the extinguished amount. The overall borrowing capacity under the revolving facility did not change. The amendment of the revolving facility resulted in accelerated amortization of $54 relating to the existing unamortized debt issue cost. The remaining unamortized costs related to the revolving facility and the additional third party fee paid in connection with the amendment of the revolving facility shall be amortized over the term of the revolving facility ending on August 30, 2017.
As of December 31, 2012 and June 30, 2013, the outstanding term loan, net of debt amortization expense of $11,452 and $15,024, was $661,860 and $659,976 respectively. As of December 31, 2012, the term loan bears interest at LIBOR (Libor floor of 1%) plus an applicable margin of 3.25% p.a. As of June 30, 2013, the term loan bears interest at LIBOR (Libor floor of 0.75%) plus an applicable margin of 2.75% p.a. Indebtedness under the loan agreement is secured by certain assets. The amount outstanding on the term loan as of June 30, 2013 will be repaid through quarterly payments of 0.25% of the principal amount of $675,000 and the balance will be repaid on the maturity of the term loan on August 30, 2019.
The maturity profile of the term loan, net of debt amortization expense, is as follows:
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
15. Cost of revenue
Cost of revenue consists of the following:
Personnel expenses
Operational expenses
32
16. Selling, general and administrative expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses consist of the following:
17. Other operating (income) expense, net
Other operating (income) expense
Provision for impairment of capital work in progress / property, plant and equipment
Change in fair value of earn out consideration and deferred consideration (relating to business acquisitions)
18. Other income (expense), net
Other income (expense), net consists of the following:
Interest income
Interest expense*
Provision for loss on divestiture
Other income (expense)
33
19. Income taxes
As of December 31, 2012, the Company had unrecognized tax benefits amounting to $21,024 including an amount of $20,871 that, if recognized, would impact the effective tax rate.
The following table summarizes the activities related to our unrecognized tax benefits for uncertain tax positions from January 1, 2013 to June 30, 2013:
Opening Balance at January 1, 2013
Increase related to prior year tax positions, including recorded against goodwill
Decrease related to prior year tax positions
Increase related to current year tax positions
Closing Balance at June 30, 2013
The unrecognized tax benefits as of June 30, 2013 include an amount of $21,199 that, if recognized, would impact the effective tax rate. As of December 31, 2012 and June 30, 2013, the Company has accrued approximately $3,423 and $3,876 respectively, in interest relating to unrecognized tax benefits.
20. Related party transactions
Related party transactions during the year ended December 31, 2012 included transactions with a client who had a significant interest in the Company. During the year ended December 31, 2012, such interest decreased to less than 5% of the Company’s outstanding shares and therefore such client is no longer a related party. The Company has also entered into related party transactions with its non-consolidating affiliates and a client in which one of the Company’s directors has a controlling interest. During the six months ended June 30, 2013, the Company acquired the remaining equity interest in one of its non-consolidating affiliates, which is now a wholly owned subsidiary as described in note 3A(a). The Company has also entered into related party transactions with an affiliate of a significant shareholder of the Company.
The related party transactions can be categorized as follows:
Revenue from services
For the six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company recognized net revenues of $227 and for the three months ended June 30, 2012, the Company recognized net revenues of $115, from a client in which one of the Company’s directors has a controlling interest.
For the six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company recognized net revenues of $90 and for the three months ended June 30, 2012, the Company recognized net revenues of $47, from a client who has a significant interest in the Company.
For the six months ended June 30, 2013, the Company recognized net revenues of $381 and for the three months ended June 30, 2013, the Company recognized net revenues of $190, from a client who is an affiliate of significant shareholder of the Company.
Cost of revenue from services
The Company purchases certain services from its non-consolidating affiliates mainly relating to training and recruitment, which are included as part of cost of revenue. For the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2013, cost of revenue, includes an amount of $1,084 and $964, respectively, and for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2013, cost of revenue, includes an amount of $529 and $544, respectively.
The Company purchases certain services from its non-consolidating affiliates mainly relating to training and recruitment, which are included as part of selling, general and administrative expenses. For the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2013, selling, general and administrative expenses includes an amount of $210 and $221, respectively, and for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2013, selling, general and administrative expenses includes an amount of $102 and $130, respectively.
34
20. Related party transactions (continued)
Investment in equity affiliate
During the six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company made an investment of $205 in its non-consolidating affiliates and for the three months ended June 30, 2012, the Company made an investment of $0 in its non-consolidating affiliates.
21. Commitments and contingencies
Capital commitments
As of December 31, 2012 and June 30, 2013, the Company has committed to spend $3,965 and $3,190, respectively, under agreements to purchase property, plant and equipment. This amount is net of capital advances paid in respect of these purchases.
Bank Guarantees
The Company has outstanding bank guarantees amounting to $13,381 and $13,839 as of December 31, 2012 and June 30, 2013, respectively. Bank guarantees are generally provided to government agencies, excise and customs authorities for the purposes of maintaining a bonded warehouse. These guarantees may be revoked by the government agencies if they suffer any losses or damage through the breach of any of the covenants contained in the agreements.
Other commitments
The Company’s business process delivery centers in India are 100% Export Oriented units or Software Technology Parks of India units (“STPI”) under the STPI guidelines issued by the Government of India. These units are exempted from customs, central excise duties, and levies on imported and indigenous capital goods, stores, and spares. The Company has executed legal undertakings to pay custom duties, service taxes, levies, and liquidated damages payable, if any, in respect of imported and indigenous capital goods, stores, and spares consumed duty free, in the event that certain terms and conditions are not fulfilled.
35
You should read the following discussion in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 and with the information under the heading “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from those discussed in or implied by any of the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including but not limited to those listed below and under “Risk Factors” in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
We have made statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Quarterly Report”) in, among other sections, this Part 1, Item 2—“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”, that are forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify these statements by forward-looking terms such as “expect”, “anticipate”, “intend”, “plan”, “believe”, “seek”, “estimate”, “could”, “may”, “shall”, “will”, “would” and variations of such words and similar expressions, or the negative of such words or similar expressions. These forward-looking statements, which are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions about us, may include projections of our future financial performance, which in some cases may be based on our growth strategies and anticipated trends in our business. These statements are only predictions based on our current expectations and projections about future events. There are important factors that could cause our actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. In particular, you should consider the numerous risks outlined in Part II, Item 1A— “Risk Factors” in this Quarterly Report and Part I, Item 1A—“Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements relating to:
our ability to retain existing clients and contracts;
our ability to win new clients and engagements;
the expected value of the statements of work under our master service agreements;
our beliefs about future trends in our market;
political, economic or business conditions in countries where we have operations or where our clients operate;
expected spending on business process management and information technology services by clients;
foreign currency exchange rates;
our rate of employee attrition;
our effective tax rate; and
competition in our industry.
Factors that may cause actual results to differ from expected results include, among others:
our ability to grow our business and effectively manage growth and international operations while maintaining effective internal controls;
our dependence on revenues derived from clients in the United States and Europe;
our ability to hire and retain enough qualified employees to support our operations;
our ability to successfully consummate or integrate strategic acquisitions;
our ability to maintain pricing and asset utilization rates;
our dependence on favorable tax legislation and tax policies that may be amended in a manner adverse to us or be unavailable to us in the future;
increases in wages in locations in which we have operations;
financing terms, including but not limited to changes in LIBOR;
the selling cycle for our client relationships;
restrictions on visas for our employees traveling to North America and Europe;
our relative dependence on the General Electric Company (GE);
36
fluctuations in exchange rates between the U.S. dollar, the euro, U.K. pound sterling, Chinese renminbi, Hungarian forint, Japanese yen, Indian rupee, Australian dollar, Philippines peso, Guatemalan quetzal, Mexican peso, Moroccan dirham, Polish zloty, Romanian leu, South African rand, Hong Kong dollar, Singapore dollar, Arab Emirates dirham, Brazilian real, Swiss franc, Swedish krona, Danish krone, Thai baht, Kenyan shilling, Czech koruna, Canadian dollar and Saudi Arabian riyal;
our ability to retain senior management;
our ability to attract and retain clients and our ability to develop and maintain client relationships on attractive terms;
legislation in the United States or elsewhere that adversely affects the performance of business process management and information technology services offshore;
increasing competition in our industry;
telecommunications or technology disruptions or breaches, or natural or other disasters;
our ability to protect our intellectual property and the intellectual property of others;
deterioration in the global economic environment and its impact on our clients, including the bankruptcy of our clients;
regulatory, legislative and judicial developments, including the withdrawal of governmental fiscal incentives;
the international nature of our business;
technological innovation; and
unionization of any of our employees.
Although we believe the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable at the time they are made, we cannot guarantee future results, level of activity, performance or achievements. Achievement of future results is subject to risks, uncertainties and potentially inaccurate assumptions. Should known or unknown risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove inaccurate, actual results could differ materially from past results and those anticipated, estimated or projected. You should bear this in mind as you consider forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to update any of these forward-looking statements after the date of this filing to conform our prior statements to actual results or revised expectations. You are advised, however, to consult any further disclosures we make on related subjects in our Form 10-K, Form 10-Q and Form 8-K reports to the SEC.
Overview
We are a global leader in business process management and technology services, leveraging the power of smarter processes, smarter analytics and smarter technology to help our clients drive intelligence across their enterprises. We believe our Smart Enterprise Processes (SEP) framework, our unique science of process combined with deep domain expertise in multiple industry verticals, leads to superior business outcomes. Our Smart Decision Services deliver valuable business insights to our clients through targeted analytics, re-engineering expertise, and advanced risk management. Making technology more intelligent by embedding it with process and data insights, we also offer a wide range of technology services. Driven by a passion for process innovation and operational excellence built on our Lean and Six Sigma DNA and the legacy of serving GE for more than 15 years, our 60,000+ professionals around the globe deliver services to more than 700 clients from a network of 68 delivery centers across 18 countries supporting more than 30 languages.
We have a unique heritage and believe we are pioneers in the business process management and information technology services industry. We built our business by meeting the demands of the leaders of GE to increase the productivity of their businesses. We began in 1997 as an internal business process services operation for General Electric Capital Corporation, or GE Capital, GE’s financial services business. As we demonstrated our value to GE management, our business grew in size and scope. We took on a wide range of complex and critical processes and became a significant provider to many of GE’s businesses, including Consumer Finance (GE Money), Commercial Finance, Healthcare, Industrial and GE’s corporate offices.
Our leadership team, our methods and our culture have been deeply influenced by our eight years as an internal operation of GE. Many elements of GE’s success—the rigorous use of metrics and analytics, the relentless focus on improvement, a strong emphasis on the client and innovative human resources practices—are the foundations of our business.
We have approximately 60,200 employees with operations in 18 countries. In the quarter ended June 30, 2013, we had net revenues of $534.8 million, of which $413.2 million, or 77.3%, was from clients other than GE, which we refer to as Global Clients, with the remaining $121.6 million, or 22.7%, of net revenues coming from GE.
In the 12 months ending June 30, 2013, 55 client relationships each contributed revenues of $5 – $15 million, up from 41 such relationships as of June 30, 2012, 14 client relationships each contributed revenues of $15 – $25 million, up from 11 such relationships as of June 30, 2012 and 12 client relationships each contributed revenues of $25 million or more, up from 10 such client relationships as of June 30, 2012.
37
Our registered office is located at Canon’s Court, 22 Victoria Street, Hamilton HM 12, Bermuda.
The Company
Our business was initially conducted through various entities and divisions of GE. In 2004, GE placed these operations under a newly formed Luxembourg company and sold indirect interests in us to General Atlantic LLC, or General Atlantic, and Oak Hill Capital Partners, or Oak Hill. In 2007, we became a Bermuda company named Genpact Limited and completed our initial public offering. In 2012, General Atlantic and Oak Hill sold the majority of their interests in us to affiliates of Bain Capital Investors, LLC, or Bain Capital.
Acquisitions
From time to time we may make acquisitions or engage in other strategic transactions if suitable opportunities arise, and we may use cash, securities or other assets as consideration.
In March 2013, we increased our interest in NGEN Media Services Private Limited (“NGEN”) to 100% from 50%, making NGEN a wholly-owned subsidiary. We acquired the 50% equity interest for cash consideration of $0.2 million. NGEN is engaged in the business of media services outsourcing.
In February 2013, we completed the acquisition of 100% of the outstanding equity interests in each of Jawood Business Process Solutions, LLC (“Jawood”) and Felix Software Solutions Private Limited (“Felix”), providers of business consulting and information technology services to the healthcare payer industry. Felix had been a key sub-contractor to Jawood. This transaction strengthens our solutions and services offerings in the healthcare payer market. Pursuant to the terms of the acquisition agreements with the respective sellers, the preliminary estimated purchase consideration for Jawood and Felix (collectively referred to as the “Jawood business”) is $48.3 million. Goodwill representing the excess of the preliminary estimated purchase price over the net assets acquired amounted to $35.9 million and has been allocated to our India reporting unit. The purchase consideration for the Jawood business is pending final adjustment for closing date net working capital, indebtedness and cash in accordance with the terms of the acquisition agreement and may result in a corresponding adjustment to goodwill during the measurement period. The measurement period will not exceed one year from the acquisition date.
In September 2012, we acquired 100% of the outstanding common and preferred stock of Atyati Technologies Private Limited (“Atyati”), a cloud-hosted technology platform provider for the rural banking sector in India, which gives us access to this rapidly growing segment as well as some strategic India client relationships, for initial cash consideration of $19.4 million subject to adjustment based on the closing date final working capital amount. The acquisition agreement also provides for additional deferred consideration which has a discounted value of $2.5 million and earn-out consideration (ranging from $0 to $14.4 million based on gross profit for the year ending March 31, 2014) which had an estimated fair value of $1.5 million. Goodwill representing the excess of the preliminary estimated purchase price over the net assets acquired amounted to $23.4 million and has been allocated to our India reporting unit. The purchase consideration for the Atyati business is pending final adjustment for closing date net working capital, indebtedness and cash in accordance with the terms of the acquisition agreement and may result in a corresponding adjustment to goodwill during the measurement period. The measurement period will not exceed one year from the acquisition date.
In August 2012, we acquired 100% of the outstanding equity interest in Triumph Engineering, Corp. and Triumph On-Demand, Inc. (collectively, the “Triumph companies”), U.S.-based providers of engineering services to the aviation, energy, and oil and gas industries, giving us engineering services capabilities for heavy manufacturing industry, for initial cash consideration of $3.6 million, subject to adjustment based on working capital and closing indebtedness. The acquisition agreement provided for additional deferred consideration which has a discounted value of $0.4 million and earn-out consideration (ranging from $0 to $4.5 million based on gross profit for the years ending December 31, 2013 and 2014) which had an estimated fair value of $3.3 million. During the period ended June 30, 2013, we recorded a measurement period adjustment which resulted in decrease in purchase consideration by $0.01 million with corresponding change to goodwill. Goodwill representing the excess of the purchase price over the net assets acquired amounted to $4.5 million and has been allocated to our India reporting unit.
In April 2012, we acquired 100% of the outstanding equity interest in Accounting Plaza B.V. (“Accounting Plaza”), a provider of finance and accounting, human resources and PeopleSoft ERP services, to give us domain expertise in retail industry and significantly expand our European presence, for cash consideration of $38.7 million subject to adjustments based on the transfer of pension funds, underfunding in pension funds and sellers warranty breaches including certain other transactions and transaction costs. There are no contingent consideration arrangements in connection with the acquisition. Goodwill representing the excess of the purchase price over the net assets acquired amounted to $25.5 million and has been allocated to our Europe reporting unit.
Divestitures
In the quarter ended March 31, 2013, we completed the divestiture of Hello Communications (Shanghai) Co. Ltd., a subsidiary engaged in the business of providing offshore tele-sales and other voice-based support services to telecom carriers and IT/telecom equipment manufacturers in Asia. The divestiture was made for cash consideration of $1.0 million, resulting in a loss of $0.4 million. The results of operations of Hello Communications (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. are not material to the Company’s results of operations or financial condition and, therefore, are not reflected as discontinued operations for the periods presented.
38
During the period ended June 30, 2013, we decided to either divest or discontinue one of our subsidiaries, Clearbizz B.V, which is engaged in the business of providing electronic invoicing services in the Netherlands, and was acquired as a part of the acquisition of Accounting Plaza. The estimated loss of $1.3 million on the expected sale of Clearbizz B.V. has been reserved within other income (expense), net in the Consolidated Statements of Income. The results of operations of Clearbizz B.V. are not material to the Company’s results of operations or financial condition and, therefore, are not reflected as discontinued operations for the periods presented.
In the quarter ended June 30, 2013, we decided to either divest or discontinue one of our subsidiaries, Gantthead.com, Inc., an online technology portal for project management, which was acquired as a part the acquisition of Headstrong. An amount of $2.3 million has been reserved representing estimated loss on the expected sale of Gantthead.com, Inc. within other income (expense), net in the Consolidated Statements of Income. The results of operations of Gantthead.com, Inc. are not material to the Company’s results of operations or financial condition and, therefore, are not reflected as discontinued operations for the periods presented.
The above divestures have been undertaken or planned in accordance with our strategy to allocate capital and resources to support profitable growth and a higher return on investment.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
For a description of our critical accounting policies, see Note 2—“Summary of significant accounting policies” under Item 1— “Financial Statements” above and Part II, Item 7— “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.
39
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth certain data from our income statement for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2013.
Three months ended June 30,
Six months ended June 30,
Net revenues—GE
Net revenues—Global Clients
Gross profit Margin
Operating expenses
Income from operations as a percentage of Total Net revenues
Net income attributable to Genpact Limited shareholders as a percentage of Total Net revenues
40
“Net revenues-Global Clients” for the six months and three months ended June 30, 2012 disclosed above includes net revenues earned from a client in which one of our directors has a controlling interest, and another client which was a significant shareholder in the Company at that time. “Net revenues- Global Clients” for the six months and three months ended June 30, 2013 disclosed above includes net revenues earned from, a client in which one of our directors has a controlling interest and a client which is an affiliate of a significant shareholder of the Company. (Refer to note 20 in Part I – Financial Statements.)
41
Three Months Ended June 30, 2013 Compared to the Three Months Ended June 30, 2012
Net revenues. Our net revenues were $534.8 million in the three months ended June 30, 2013, up $67.2 million, or 14.4%, from the three months ended June 30, 2012. Our growth in net revenues was primarily due to an increase in business process management (BPM) services and information technology (IT) services for existing Global Clients and acquisitions completed during 2012 and 2013. Our average headcount was approximately 58,300 in the second quarter of 2013, up 5.2% from the second quarter of 2012. Our annualized revenue per employee was approximately $36.7 thousand in the second quarter of 2013, up $2.8 thousand from the second quarter of 2012.
Net revenues from our IT services were $133.0 million in the second quarter of 2013, up $23.0 million, or 20.9%, from the second quarter of 2012, primarily driven by existing Global Clients and the acquisition of the Jawood business. BPM revenues were $401.8 million in the second quarter of 2013, up $44.2 million, or 12.4%, from the second quarter of 2012, primarily led by existing Global Clients and the acquisitions of the Triumph Companies and Atyati. Growth in BPM services includes a $6.1 million increase in our Smart Decision Services revenues, primarily from Global Clients. Net revenue from our IT services business as a percentage of total net revenues increased to 24.9% in the second quarter of 2013, up from 23.5% in the second quarter of 2012. Revenues from business process management services as a percentage of total net revenues decreased to 75.1% in the second quarter of 2013 from 76.5% in the second quarter of 2012.
Net revenues from Global Clients were $413.2 million in the second quarter of 2013, up $71.8 million, or 21.0%, from the second quarter of 2012. $19.5 million, or 27.1%, of the increase was from clients in the banking and financial services industries. $21.6 million, or 30.1%, of the increase came from clients in the consumer packaged goods, pharmaceutical and healthcare industries, including IT services revenue from the acquisition of the Jawood business. $22.3 million, or 31.0%, of the increase was from clients in the business services vertical.
Net revenues from GE were $121.6 million in the second quarter of 2013, down $4.6 million, or 3.6%, from the second quarter of 2012. As described in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Overview — Classification of Certain Net Revenues” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, net revenues from certain businesses in which GE ceased to be a 20% shareholder are classified as a part of GE net revenues up to the time of their divestiture by GE and as a part of Global Client net revenues post divestiture. Net revenues from GE in the second quarter of 2013 decreased by 0.9% compared to the second quarter of 2012 after excluding net revenues from such dispositions by GE.
We saw growth in all of our geographical regions in the second quarter of 2013. Net revenues from India-based service delivery centers were $350.8 million in the second quarter of 2013, up $37.2 million, or 11.8%, from the second quarter of 2012. A portion of net revenues attributable to India-based service delivery centers includes net revenues for services performed from delivery centers outside India or at clients’ premises outside of India by business units or personnel normally based in India. Net revenues from delivery centers located in the Americas contributed $75.0 million of total net revenues, up 34.3% from the second quarter of 2012. In the second quarter of 2013, delivery centers located in Europe contributed $54.0 million of total net revenues, up 14.2% from the second quarter of 2012. The balance of net revenues, which is attributable to Asia, other than India, was $54.9 million, up 8.2% million from the second quarter of 2012.
Cost of revenue. The following table sets forth the components of our cost of revenue:
Cost of revenue as a percentage of total net revenues
Cost of revenue for the second quarter of 2013 was $332.7 million, up $47.5 million from the second quarter of 2012. Of this increase, $16.2 million is attributable to acquisitions completed after the second quarter of 2012. Another $7.5 million of the increase in cost of revenue relates to higher facility and infrastructure related expenses and communication expenses. An increase in operational headcount of approximately 2,900 employees and wage inflation also resulted in a higher cost of revenue for the second quarter of 2013 compared to the second quarter of 2012. The increase is also a result of a higher loss on our Indian rupee-U.S. dollar hedges (net of unhedged costs) in the second quarter of 2013 compared to the second quarter of 2012. The increase in cost of revenue was partially offset by a reduction in non-recoverable expenses through productivity in internal travel expenses and business managed spends.
42
Personnel expenses. Personnel expenses for the second quarter of 2013 were $229.1 million, up $34.0 million, or 17.4%, from the second quarter of 2012. $10.3 million of the total increase is attributable to acquisitions completed after the second quarter of 2012. To manage additional growth, our average operational headcount, excluding these acquisitions, increased by approximately 2,900 employees, or 6.1%, compared to the second quarter of 2012. The increase also resulted from wage inflation and a higher loss on our Indian rupee-U.S. dollar hedges (net of unhedged costs) in the second quarter of 2013 compared to the second quarter of 2012. As a result, personnel expenses as a percentage of net revenues increased from 41.7% in the second quarter of 2012 to 42.8% in the second quarter of 2013.
Operational expenses. Operational expenses as a component of cost of revenue were $91.2 million in the second quarter of 2013, up $13.2 million, or 16.9%, from the second quarter of 2012. Of this increase, $5.7 million is attributable to acquisitions completed after the second quarter of 2012. Additionally, we expensed approximately $5.5 million in the second quarter of 2013 in connection with the expansion of our existing facilities and the opening of new delivery centers in China, Poland and the U.S. after the second quarter of 2012. The balance of the increase is primarily attributable to a higher loss on our Indian rupee-U.S. dollar hedges (net of unhedged costs) in the second quarter of 2013 compared to the second quarter of 2012. This increase was partially offset by lower internal business travel costs and managed spends in the second quarter of 2013 compared to the second quarter of 2012. As a result, operational expenses as a percentage of net revenues increased from 16.7% in the second quarter of 2012 to 17.1% in the second quarter of 2013.
Depreciation and amortization expenses. Depreciation and amortization expenses as a component of cost of revenue were $12.4 million in the second quarter of 2013, up $0.3 million from the second quarter of 2012. The depreciation on the expansion of certain existing facilities and the addition of new delivery centers was substantially offset by an increase in fully depreciated assets since the second quarter of 2012. Further, $0.2 million is attributable to acquisitions completed after the second quarter of 2012. A higher loss on our Indian rupee-U.S. dollar hedges (net of unhedged costs) also contributed to the increase in depreciation and amortization expenses. As a percentage of net revenues, depreciation and amortization expenses declined to 2.3% in the second quarter of 2013 from 2.6% in the second quarter of 2012.
As a result of the foregoing, our gross profit increased by $19.7 million, or 10.8%, and our gross margin decreased from 39.0% in the second quarter of 2012 to 37.8% in the second quarter of 2013.
Selling, general and administrative expenses. The following table sets forth the components of our selling, general and administrative expenses:
SG&A as a percentage of total net revenues
Selling, general and administrative, or SG&A, expenses for the second quarter of 2013 were $118.4 million, up $4.2 million from the second quarter of 2012. Of this increase, $4.0 million is attributable to acquisitions completed after the second quarter of 2012. Additionally, increased hiring of sales personnel in our targeted vertical markets—Banking and Financial Services, Consumer Packaged Goods, Life Sciences and Healthcare and Business Services—along with the effect of wage inflation resulted in higher SG&A expenses. The increase is also a result of a higher loss on our Indian rupee-U.S. dollar hedges (net of unhedged costs) in the second quarter of 2013 compared to the second quarter of 2012. This increase in expenses was partially offset by a net reduction in our headcount along with a reduction in internal travel through optimal use of collaborative tools.
Personnel expenses. The largest component of the increase in SG&A expenses was personnel expenses, which amounted to $85.7 million in the second quarter of 2013, up $6.1 million from the second quarter of 2012. Of this increase, $2.3 million is attributable to personnel expenses from acquisitions completed after the second quarter of 2012. Further, there was a 10.6% increase in sales team personnel expenses to support growth. A higher loss on our Indian rupee-U.S. dollar hedges (net of unhedged costs) and wage inflation also contributed to the increase in SG&A expenses in the second quarter of 2013 compared to the second quarter of 2012. This increase was partially offset by a net reduction in our headcount in the second quarter of 2013. As a percentage of net revenues, personnel expenses decreased from 17.0% in the second quarter of 2012 to 16.0% in the second quarter of 2013.
43
Operational expenses. Operational expenses as a component of SG&A expenses decreased by $1.9 million, or 5.8%, in the second quarter of 2013. This decrease was primarily due to reduced internal travel costs and more productive marketing spends. In the second quarter of 2012, we expensed one-time legal and consultancy fees amounting to $0.9 million in connection with a change of shareholding and capital restructuring, which was offset by an expense of $1.1 million in the second quarter of 2013 resulting from the amendment of our existing debt facility. This decrease was partially offset by $0.5 million of additional operational expenses in connection with acquisitions completed after the second quarter of 2012. In addition, a higher loss on our Indian rupee-U.S. dollar hedges (net of unhedged costs) resulted in a greater increase in expenses in the second quarter of 2013 compared to the second quarter of 2012. As a net result, operational expenses as a percentage of net revenues decreased from 6.9% in the second quarter of 2012 to 5.7% in the second quarter of 2013.
Depreciation and amortization expenses. Depreciation and amortization expenses as a component of SG&A expenses decreased by $0.1 million in the second quarter of 2013. This decrease was in spite of an additional capital expenditure of $1.2 million resulting from acquisitions completed after the second quarter of 2012. The depreciation on the expansion of certain existing facilities and the addition of new delivery centers was more than offset by an increase in fully depreciated assets since the second quarter of 2012. Further, a higher loss on our Indian rupee-U.S. dollar hedges (net of unhedged costs) contributed to the increase in the depreciation and amortization expense. As a result, depreciation and amortization expenses as a percentage of net revenues declined to 0.4% in the second quarter of 2013 from 0.5% in the second quarter of 2012.
Amortization of acquired intangibles. Non-cash charges on the amortization of acquired intangibles in the second quarter of 2013 were $6.2 million, up $0.4 million from the second quarter of 2012. The acquisitions completed after the second quarter of 2012 resulted in an additional amortization expense of $1.1 million. This expense was substantially offset by a decline in intangibles acquired during the Company’s 2004 reorganization of $1.0 million which were fully amortized after June 2012. In each case, the amortization was consistent with the applicable estimated useful life of the acquired intangibles.
Other operating (income) expense, net. Other net operating income for the second quarter of 2013 was $0.5 million, down $0.3 million from the second quarter of 2012. We recorded a non-recurring provision for impairment of $2.4 million in the second quarter of 2013 against certain capital assets in India that are no longer strategic to our growth. This expense was offset by a gain of $2.3 million on account of a change in the fair value of earn-out consideration relating to the acquisitions of Empower, the Triumph Companies and Atyati. The balance of the decrease is primarily attributable to lower income from shared services with GE due to lower usage of our delivery centers.
Income from operations. As a result of the foregoing factors, income from operations increased by $63.2 million to $78.0 million in the second quarter of 2013. As a percentage of net revenues, income from operations increased from 13.5% in the second quarter of 2012 to 14.6% in the second quarter of 2013.
Foreign exchange (gains) losses, net. We recorded a net foreign exchange gain of $17.2 million in the second quarter of 2013, compared to a net gain of $22.0 million in the second quarter of 2012, primarily due to the re-measurement of our non-functional currency assets and liabilities and related foreign exchange contracts resulting from further depreciation of the Indian rupee against the U.S. dollar in the second quarter of 2013 compared to the second quarter of 2012.
Other income (expense), net. The following table sets forth the components of other income (expense), net:
Interest expense
Provision for loss on divestitures
Other income (expense), net as a percentage of total net revenues
We recorded net other expense of $10.5 million in the second quarter of 2013 compared to $0.7 million in the second quarter of 2012. This increase was primarily on account of a higher interest expense of $9.4 million resulting from the amendment to our existing debt facility obtained in August 2012 with the consortium of financial institutions as explained in the note “Financial Condition.” As a result of the amendment, we expensed $3.1 million representing a partial acceleration of the amortization of the
44
existing unamortized debt issuance costs and part of the additional fee paid to lenders. The amendment of the revolving facility resulted in the accelerated amortization of $0.1 million relating to the existing unamortized debt issuance cost. The interest expense increased by $6.4 million in the second quarter of 2013 primarily on account of higher outstanding borrowings of $660.0 million as of June 30, 2013 compared to $88.5 million as of June 30, 2012. As a result of the amended borrowings, the weighted average rate of interest with respect to outstanding debt under our debt facility increased from 2.1% in the second quarter of 2012 to 4.1% in the second quarter of 2013. We also reserved $0.6 million and $2.3 million, respectively, on account of the planned divestiture or discontinuance of Clearbizz B.V. and Gantthead.com, Inc. Refer to “Divestitures” in Part I, Item 2—“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” This increase in other expenses was partially offset by higher interest income of $2.1 million mainly on account of higher deposits placed in India during the second quarter of 2013 compared to the second quarter of 2012.
Income before equity method investment activity, net, and income tax expense. As a result of the foregoing factors, income before equity method investment activity, net, and income tax expense increased by $0.2 million. As a percentage of net revenues, income before equity method investment activity, net, and income tax decreased from 18.1% in the second quarter of 2012 to 15.8% in the second quarter of 2013.
Equity method investment activity, net. This represents our share of income from our non-consolidated affiliates, NGEN Media Services Private Limited (NGEN), a joint venture with NDTV Networks Plc., and NIIT Uniqua, a joint venture with NIIT, one of the largest training institutes in Asia. In March 2013, we acquired the remaining equity interest in NGEN.
Income before income tax expense. As a result of the foregoing factors, income before income tax expense increased by $0.3 million. As a percentage of net revenues, income before income tax expense decreased from 18.1% of net revenues in the second quarter of 2012 to 15.8% of net revenues in the second quarter of 2013.
Income tax expense. Our income tax expense decreased from $21.6 million in the second quarter of 2012 to $19.2 million in the second quarter of 2013, representing an effective tax rate of 23.1% in the second quarter of 2013, down from 26.1% in the second quarter of 2012. This decrease was primarily driven by the growth of our operations in low tax and tax-exempt locations, primarily in India, and the impact of certain period items in the second quarter of 2013.
Net income. As a result of the foregoing factors, net income increased by $2.7 million to $65.5 million in the second quarter of 2013 from $62.8 million in the second quarter of 2012. As a percentage of net revenues, our net income decreased from 13.4% of net revenues in the second quarter of 2012 to 12.2% of net revenues in the second quarter of 2013.
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest. Noncontrolling interest refers to the noncontrolling partners’ interest in the operation of Genpact Netherlands B.V. It represents the apportionment of profits to the minority partners of Genpact Netherlands B.V. Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest decreased marginally from $1.7 million in the second quarter of 2012 to $1.6 million in the second quarter of 2013.
Net income attributable to Genpact Limited shareholders. As a result of the foregoing factors, net income attributable to Genpact Limited shareholders increased by $2.8 million from $61.1 million in the second quarter of 2012 to $63.9 million in the second quarter of 2013. As a percentage of net revenues, net income decreased from 13.1% of net revenues in the second quarter of 2012 to 11.9% of net revenues in the second quarter of 2013.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 Compared to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2012
Net revenues. Our net revenues were $1,038.7 million in the six months ended June 30, 2013, up $135.5 million, or 15.0%, from the six months ended June 30, 2012. The growth in net revenues was primarily due to an increase in both BPM and IT services for existing Global Clients and acquisitions completed during 2012 and 2013. Our average headcount was approximately 58,600 in the first half of 2013, up 6.9% from the first half of 2012. Our annualized revenue per employee was approximately $35.6 thousand in the first half of 2013, up $2.2 thousand from the first half of 2012.
Net revenues from IT services for the first half of 2013 were $252.9 million, up $39.9 million, or 18.7%, from the first half of 2012, primarily driven by revenues from existing Global Clients and the acquisition of the Jawood business. BPM revenues for the first half of 2013 were $785.8 million, up $95.7 million, or 13.9% from the first half of 2012, primarily led by revenues from existing Global Clients and the acquisitions of the Triumph Companies and Atyati. Growth in BPM services includes a $6.4 million increase in our Smart Decision Services revenue primarily from Global Clients.
Net revenues from IT services as a percentage of total net revenues increased to 24.3% in the first half of 2013 from 23.6% in the first half of 2012. BPM revenues as a percentage of total net revenues decreased to 75.7% in the first half of 2013 from 76.4% in the first half of 2012.
Net revenues from Global Clients for the first half of 2013 were $800.0 million, up $139.0 million, or 21.0%, from the first half of 2012. Of this increase, $46.4 million, or 33.4%, was from clients in the banking and financial services industries. $46.7
45
million, or 33.6%, of the increase came from clients in the consumer packaged goods, pharmaceutical and healthcare industries, including IT services revenue from the acquisition of the Jawood business. Additionally, $27.2 million, or 19.6%, of total Global Client net revenues came from the business services industry vertical. As a percentage of total net revenues, net revenues from Global Clients increased from 73.2% in the first half of 2012 to 77.0% in the first half of 2013.
Net revenues from GE in the first half of 2013 were $238.7 million, down $3.4 million, or 1.4%, from the first half of 2012. As described under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Overview — Classification of Certain Net Revenues” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, revenues from certain businesses in which GE ceased to be a 20% shareholder are classified as a part of GE net revenues up to the time of their divestiture by GE and as a part of Global Clients revenues post divestiture. Net revenues from GE for the first half of 2013 increased by 0.2% compared to the first half of 2012 after excluding net revenues from such dispositions by GE.
Net revenues grew in all of our geographic delivery regions in the first half of 2013. Net revenues from India-based service delivery centers were $681.2 million in the first half of 2013, up $82.1 million from the first half of 2012. A portion of net revenues attributable to India-based service delivery centers includes net revenues for services performed from delivery centers outside of India or at clients’ premises outside of India by business units or personnel normally based in India. Net revenues from delivery centers located in the Americas contributed $141.0 million, up 25.8% from the first half of 2012. In the first half of 2013, delivery centers located in Europe contributed $105.5 million to total net revenues, up 22.5% from the first half of 2012. The balance of net revenues, which are attributable to Asia, other than India, were $111.0 million, up 4.9% from the first half of 2012.
Cost of revenue for the first half of 2013 was $644.4 million, up $93.8 million, or 17.0%, from the first half of 2012. Of this increase, $36.8 million is attributable to acquisitions completed during 2012 and 2013. Another $15.7 million of the increase in cost of revenue relates to higher facility and infrastructure related expenses, business related travel, communication and other expenses. An average increase in operational headcount of 3,600 employees and wage inflation also resulted in a higher cost of revenue for the first half of 2013 compared to the first half of 2012. The increase is also a result of a higher loss on our Indian rupee-U.S. dollar hedges (net of unhedged costs) in the first half of 2013 compared to the first half of 2012, which is partially offset by a reduction in non-recoverable expenses.
Personnel expenses. Personnel expenses for the first half of 2013 were $447.5 million, up $66.9 million, or 17.6%, from the first half of 2012. $23.8 million of this increase is attributable to acquisitions completed during 2012 and 2013. To manage additional growth, our average operational headcount, excluding these acquisitions, increased by approximately 3,600 employees, or 7.5%, in the first half of 2013 compared to the first half of 2012. Wage inflation and a higher loss on our Indian rupee-U.S. dollar hedges (net of unhedged costs) in the first half of 2013 compared to the first half of 2012 also contributed to the increase in the cost of revenue. As a result, personnel expenses as a percentage of net revenues increased from 42.1% in the first half of 2012 to 43.1% in the first half of 2013.
Operational expenses. As a component of cost of revenue, operational expenses for the first half of 2013 were $172.7 million, up $26.6 million, or 18.2%, from the first half of 2012. Of this increase, $12.4 million is attributable to acquisitions completed during 2012 and 2013. Additionally, in the first half of 2013, we expensed approximately $8.9 million in connection with expanding existing facilities and opening new delivery centers in China, India and Poland after the first half of 2012. The balance of the increase is attributable to a higher loss on our Indian rupee-U.S. dollar hedges (net of unhedged costs) in the first half of 2013 compared to the first half of 2012. As a result, operational expenses as a percentage of net revenues increased from 16.2% in the first half of 2012 to 16.6% in the first half of 2013.
Depreciation and amortization expenses. As a component of cost of revenue, depreciation and amortization expenses for the first half of 2013 were $24.2 million, up $0.2 million, or 0.9%, from the first half of 2012. The depreciation on the expansion of
46
certain existing facilities and the addition of new delivery centers was substantially offset by an increase in fully depreciated assets since the first half of 2012. Further, $0.6 million is attributable to acquisitions completed during 2012 and 2013. A higher loss on our Indian rupee-U.S. dollar hedges (net of unhedged costs) also contributed to the increase in the depreciation and amortization expenses. As a percentage of net revenues, depreciation and amortization expenses declined to 2.3% in the first half of 2013 from 2.7 % in the first half of 2012.
As a result of the foregoing, our gross profit increased by $41.8 million, or 11.9%, and our gross margin decreased from 39.0% in the first half of 2012 to 38.0% in the first half of 2013.
Selling, general and administrative expenses for the first half of 2013 were $231.6 million, up $12.4 million, or 5.6%, from the first half of 2012. $9.1 million of this increase is attributable to acquisitions completed during 2012 and 2013. Additionally, the hiring of sales personnel in our targeted vertical markets—Banking and Financial Services, Consumer Packaged Goods, Life Sciences and Healthcare and Business Services—along with the effect of wage inflation contributed to higher SG&A expenses. The increase is also a result of a higher loss on our Indian rupee-U.S. dollar hedges (net of unhedged costs) in the first half of 2013 compared to the first half of 2012. This increase in expenses was partially offset by a net reduction in our headcount in the first half of 2013 along with a reduction in internal travel through optimal use of collaborative tools and efficiencies leading to lower general and administrative expenses in the first half of 2013. The first half of 2012 also included one-time legal and consultancy fees amounting to $2.2 million in connection with a change of shareholding and capital restructuring, which fees were partially offset by an expense of $1.1 million in the second quarter of 2013 resulting from the amendment of our debt facility.
Personnel expenses. Personnel expenses in the first half of 2013 were $167.8 million, up $17.3 million, or 11.5%, from the first half of 2012. $5.4 million of this increase is attributable to acquisitions completed during 2012 and 2013. Further, there was a 12.9% increase in sales team personnel expenses to support growth. Wage inflation also contributed to higher personnel expenses in the first half of 2013. This increase was partially offset by a decrease in stock-based compensation expenses from $13.5 million in the first half of 2012 to $12.4 million in the first half of 2013, resulting mainly from updated forfeiture rate assumptions made in the first half of 2013. The balance of the increase was the result of a higher loss on our Indian rupee-U.S. dollar hedges (net of unhedged costs) in the first half of 2013 compared to the first half of 2012. This increase was partially offset by a net reduction in our headcount in the first half of 2013. As a percentage of net revenues, personnel expenses decreased from 16.7% in the first half of 2012 to 16.2% in the first half of 2013.
Operational expenses. Operational expenses as a component of SG&A expenses were $59.5 million in the first half of 2013, down $4.9 million, or 7.5%, from the first half of 2012. This decrease was in spite of the acquisitions completed during 2012 and 2013, which contributed $1.9 million to the increase in operational expenses in the first half of 2013. In addition, $1.1 million of expenses resulting from the amendment of our existing debt facility as described below in the note “Financial Condition” contributed to the increase in operational expenses in the first half of 2013. The opening of new delivery centers, the expansion of existing sites, and a reserve for doubtful debts of $3.0 million created in the first half of 2013 with respect to a client in China with an aged outstanding balance also resulted in an increase in operational expenses. However, this increase was more than offset by lower travel costs, more productive marketing spends, lower legal and consultancy costs and efficiencies in general and administrative spending in the first half of 2013. The first half of 2012 also included one-time legal and consultancy fees amounting to $2.2 million in connection with a change of shareholding and capital restructuring. As a result, operational expenses as a percentage of net revenues decreased from 7.1% in the first half of 2012 to 5.7% in the first half of 2013.
47
Depreciation and amortization expenses. Depreciation and amortization expenses as a component of SG&A expenses were $4.3 million in the first half of 2013, down $0.1 million from the first half of 2012. This decrease was in spite of an additional expense of $1.8 million resulting from the acquisitions completed during 2012 and 2013. The depreciation on the expansion of certain existing facilities and the addition of new delivery centers was more than offset by an increase in fully depreciated assets since the first half of 2012. In addition, a higher loss on our Indian rupee-U.S. dollar hedges (net of unhedged costs) contributed to an increase in depreciation and amortization expenses. As a result, depreciation and amortization expenses as a percentage of net revenues decreased from 0.5% in the first half of 2012 to 0.4% in the first half of 2013.
Amortization of acquired intangibles. Non-cash charges on amortization of acquired intangibles in the first half of 2012 were $11.7 million, up $0.6 million from the first half of 2012. The acquisitions completed during 2012 and 2013 resulted in an additional amortization expense of $1.5 million, which was partially offset by a decline in intangibles acquired during the Company’s 2004 reorganization of $2.1 million which were fully amortized after June 2012. In each case, the amortization was consistent with the applicable estimated useful life of the acquired intangible assets.
Other operating (income) expense, net. Net other operating income for the first half of 2013 was $1.1 million, down $0.4 million from the first half of 2012. In the first half of 2013, we recorded a non-recurring provision for impairment of $2.4 million against certain capital assets that are no longer strategic to the Company’s growth. This expense was offset by a gain of $2.3 million on account of a change in the fair value of earn-out consideration relating to the acquisitions of Empower, Triumph Companies and Atyati. The balance of the decrease is primarily attributable to lower income from shared services with GE due to lower usage of our delivery centers.
Income from operations. As a result of the foregoing factors, income from operations increased by $28.3 million to $151.9 million in the first half of 2013. As a percentage of net revenues, income from operations increased from 13.7% in the first half of 2012 to 14.6% in the first half of 2013.
Foreign exchange (gains) losses, net. We recorded a net foreign exchange gain of $13.8 million in the first half of 2013, compared to a net foreign exchange gain of $18.3 million in the first half of 2012, primarily due to the re-measurement of our non-functional currency assets and liabilities and related foreign exchange contracts resulting from the further depreciation of the Indian rupee against the U.S. dollar in the first half of 2013 compared to the first half of 2012.
Other income
We recorded net other expense of $15.7 million, up $14.8 million from the first half of 2012. This increase was primarily on account of an increase in interest expense of $15.8 million resulting from the amendment to our existing debt facility obtained in August 2012 with a consortium of financial institutions. As a result of the amendment, we expensed $3.1 million representing partial acceleration of the amortization of existing unamortized debt issuance costs and part of the additional fee paid to the lenders. Interest expense also increased by $12.6 million in the first half of 2013 compared to the first half of 2012 primarily on account of higher outstanding borrowings of $660.0 million as of June 30, 2013 compared to $88.5 million as of June 30, 2012. As a result of the amended borrowings, the weighted average rate of interest with respect to outstanding debt under our debt facility increased from 2.1% in the first half of 2012 to 4.1% in the first half of 2013. We also reserved an amount of $1.3 million and $2.3 million, respectively, on account of the planned divestiture or discontinuance of Clearbizz B.V. and Gantthead.com, Inc. Refer to “Divestitures” in Part I, Item 2—“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” These increases were partially offset by higher interest income of $4.3 million mainly on account of higher cash deposits in India during the first half of 2013 compared to the first half of 2012.
Income before equity method investment activity, net, and income tax expense. As a result of the foregoing factors, income before equity method investment activity, net, and income tax expense increased by $9.0 million. As a percentage of net revenues, income before equity method investment activity, net, and income tax expense decreased from 15.6% in the first half of 2012 to 14.5% in the first half of 2013.
48
Equity method investment activity, net. This represents our share of loss from our non-consolidated affiliates, NGEN Media Services Private Limited, a joint venture with NDTV Networks Plc., and NIIT Uniqua, a joint venture with NIIT, one of the largest training institutes in Asia. In March 2013, we acquired the remaining equity interest in NGEN.
Income before income tax expense. As a result of the foregoing factors, income before income tax expense increased by $9.1 million. As a percentage of net revenues, income before income tax expense decreased from 15.6% of net revenues in the first half of 2012 to 14.5% of net revenues in the first half of 2013.
Income tax expense. Our income tax expense decreased from $38.0 million in the first half of 2012 to $36.5 million in the first half of 2013, representing an effective tax rate of 24.8% in the first half of 2013, down from 27.6% in first half of 2012. This decrease was primarily driven by the growth of our operations in low tax and tax-exempt locations, primarily in India, and the impact of certain period items in the first half of 2013.
Net income. As a result of the foregoing factors, net income increased by $10.7 million from $103.1 million in the first half of 2012 to $113.7 million in the first half of 2013. As a percentage of net revenues, net income decreased from 11.4% of net revenues in the first half of 2012 to 10.9% of net revenues in the first half of 2013.
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest. Noncontrolling interest primarily refers to the noncontrolling partners’ interest in the operation of Genpact Netherlands B.V. and the noncontrolling shareholders’ interest in the operation of Hello Communications (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. This represents the profits or losses associated with the noncontrolling interest in those operations. Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest decreased from $3.4 million in the first half of 2012 to $3.1 million in the first half of 2013. This decrease was primarily driven by the divestiture of Hello Communications (Shanghai) Co., Ltd in the first quarter of 2013 described in note 3B in Item 1 – Financial Statements.
Net income attributable to Genpact Limited shareholders. As a result of the foregoing factors, net income attributable to Genpact Limited shareholders increased by $11.0 million from $99.6 million in the first half of 2012 to $110.6 million in the first half of 2013. As a percentage of net revenues, net income decreased from 11.0% of net revenues in the first half of 2012 to 10.6% in the first half of 2013.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Information about our financial position as of December 31, 2012 and June 30, 2013 is presented below:
Long-term debt due within one year
Long-term debt other than the current portion
Genpact Limited total shareholders’ equity
Financial Condition
We finance our operations and our expansion, including acquisitions, with cash from operations and borrowing facilities.
Our cash and cash equivalents were $519.1 million as of June 30, 2013, up from $459.2 million as of December 31, 2012. Our cash and cash equivalents as of June 30, 2013 were comprised of (a) $185.7 million in cash in current accounts across all operating locations to be used for working capital and immediate capital requirements, (b) $332.6 million in deposits with banks to be used for medium-term planned expenditure and capital requirements, and (c) $0.8 million constituting a restricted cash balance.
As of June 30, 2013, $508.2 million of the $519.1 million of cash and cash equivalents was held by our non-Bermuda subsidiaries and branch offices. We intend to either permanently reinvest $493.2 million of the cash held by our foreign subsidiaries or repatriate it in a tax-free manner. We have accrued U.S. taxes on the remaining cash of $15.0 million held by one of our foreign
49
subsidiaries, which amount can be repatriated to the U.S. without accruing any additional U.S. tax expense. The Indian government has recently adopted changes to taxation on distributions from Indian companies that could affect our ability to repatriate undistributed and future earnings in a tax-free manner from our subsidiaries in India. We are evaluating the full implications and scope of the new distribution tax changes to determine how they may apply to us. Accordingly, the impact, if any, of the new legislation is presently unclear.
We expect that in the future our cash from operations, cash reserves and debt capacity will be sufficient to finance our operations as well as our growth and expansion. Our working capital needs are primarily to finance our payroll and other administrative and information technology expenses in advance of the receipt of accounts receivable. Our capital requirements include opening new delivery centers and financing acquisitions.
Cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities, as reflected in our consolidated statements of cash flows, are summarized in the following table:
Net cash provided by (used for)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
Cash flows from operating activities. Our net cash generated from operating activities was $107.7 million in the first half of 2013, down $24.4 million from the first half of 2012. During the first half of 2012, an increase of $45.0 million in operating cash flows was related to a non-recurring receivable from one of our clients for certain contractual obligations, including upgrading facilities, infrastructure and technology used to service that client’s processes. Normalizing the cash flows for this receipt, our cash generated from operating activities increased by $20.6 million in the first half of 2013. This increase primarily resulted from a $39.1 million increase in our net income adjusted for amortization and depreciation and other non-cash items and was partially offset by a decrease in working capital as a result of a payment of interest on earn-out consideration in connection with certain acquisitions and the payment of annual bonuses in the first half of 2013.
Cash flows from investing activities. Our net cash used for investing activities was $72.5 million in the first half of 2013 compared to $84.5 million in the first half of 2012. This decrease in net cash used for investing activities was primarily due to lower payments for purchases of property, plant and equipment (net of sales proceeds) of $25.4 million in the first half of 2013, down from $41.3 million in the first half of 2012. This decrease was partially offset by the payment of $36.9 million, net of cash acquired, to acquire Accounting Plaza in the first half of 2012, compared to $46.1 million, net of cash acquired, paid for the acquisitions of the Jawood business and NGEN during the first half of 2013.
Cash flows from financing activities. Our net cash provided by financing activities was $41.6 million in the first half of 2013, compared to net cash used for financing activities of $17.5 million in the first half of 2012. This increase was primarily due to the amendment of the term loan and the revolving facility in June 2013. As a result of the amendment, we partly extinguished the outstanding term loan under the previous debt facility amounting to $118.0 million and obtained additional funding amounting to $121.4 million, resulting in a net inflow of $3.4 million. In addition, an incremental revolving debt facility amounting to $35.0 million was utilized in the first half of 2013. There was no corresponding utilization of a revolving facility in the first half of 2012. The balance of the increase is attributable to proceeds from the issuance of common shares under our stock-based compensation plans, which amounted to $27.5 million in the first half of 2013 compared to $3.8 million in the first half of 2012. The foregoing increases were partially offset by expenses of $7.9 million relating to the amendment of the debt facility in the first half of 2013 and the payment of earn-out and deferred consideration amounting to $3.0 million relating to the acquisitions of HPP, Akritiv and Empower. No such earn-out or deferred consideration was paid in the first half of 2012.
Financing Arrangements (Debt Facility)
Total long-term debt, excluding capital lease obligations, was $660.0 million as of June 30, 2013, compared to $661.9 million as of December 31, 2012.
In June 2013, we amended our existing debt facility obtained in August 2012 with a consortium of financial institutions. Under the amended facility, the applicable margin on the term loan and revolving debt facility has been reduced from 3.25% to 2.75% and 2.50%, respectively. In addition, the LIBOR floor on the term loan was reduced from 1% under the earlier facility to 0.75%
50
facility to 0.75% under the amended debt facility. As of the amendment date, the gross outstanding term loan amounted to $671.6 million. The amendment did not result in a substantial modification of $553.6 million of the outstanding term loan under the previous debt facility. Further, as a result of the amendment, we extinguished the outstanding term loan under the previous debt facility amounting to $118.0 million and obtained additional funding amounting to $121.4 million, increasing the total term loan outstanding to $675.0 million.
We finance our short-term working capital requirements through cash flow from operations and credit facilities from banks and financial institutions. As of June 30, 2013, short-term credit facilities available to the Company aggregated $250.0 million, which are governed by the same amended agreement as our refinanced long-term debt facility. There was no change in the overall borrowing capacity under the revolving loan facility as a result of the amendment. As of June 30, 2013, a total of $122.4 million was utilized, representing a funded drawdown of $115.0 million and non-funded drawdown of $7.4 million. The amendment of the revolving facility described above resulted in the accelerated amortization of $0.1 million relating to the existing unamortized debt issuance cost. The remaining unamortized costs related to the revolving facility and an additional third-party fee paid in connection with the amendment of the revolving facility will be amortized over the term of the amended revolving facility ending on August 30, 2017.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Our off-balance sheet arrangements consist of foreign exchange contracts and certain operating leases. For additional information, see “Contractual Obligations” below.
Contractual Obligations
The following table sets forth our total future contractual obligations as of June 30, 2013:
- Principal payments
- Interest payments*
Long-term debt
Capital leases
- Interest payments
Operating leases
Purchase obligations
Capital commitments net of advances
Contingent Consideration
Other long-term liabilities
Total contractual cash obligations
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Recently adopted accounting pronouncements
For a description of recently adopted accounting pronouncements, see Note 2—“Recently adopted accounting pronouncements” under Item 1—“Financial Statements” above and Part II, Item 7—“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.
During the six months ended June 30, 2013, there were no material changes in our market risk exposure. For a discussion of our market risk associated with foreign currency risk, interest rate risk and credit risk, see Item 7A —“Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.
51
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Disclosure controls and procedures are the Company’s controls and other procedures which are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(b). Based upon that evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and the Company’s Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information relating to the Company (including its consolidated subsidiaries) required to be included in the Company’s periodic SEC filings.
Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting during the quarter ended March 31, 2013 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting.
There are no legal proceedings pending against us that we believe are likely to have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We have disclosed under the heading “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 the risk factors that materially affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. You should carefully consider the “Risk Factors” set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 and the other information set forth below and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. You should be aware that these risk factors and other information may not describe every risk facing our Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or results of operations.
Tax matters, new legislation and actions by taxing authorities may have an adverse effect on our operations, effective tax rate and financial condition.
We are subject to income taxes in the United States and numerous foreign jurisdictions. Our tax expense and cash tax liability in the future could be adversely affected by numerous factors, including, but not limited to, changes in tax laws, regulations, accounting principles or interpretations and the potential adverse outcome of tax examinations and pending tax-related litigation. Changes in the valuation of deferred tax assets and liabilities, which may result from a decline in our profitability or changes in tax rates or legislation, could have a material adverse effect on our tax expense. The Government of India may assert that certain of our clients have a “permanent establishment” in India by reason of the activities we perform on their behalf, particularly those clients that exercise control over or have substantial dependency on our services. Such an assertion could affect the size and scope of the services requested by such clients in the future.
The Government of India had served notice on the Company about its potential liability, as a representative assesse of GE, for Indian tax upon GE’s 2004 transfer of shares of a predecessor of the Company. GE challenged the positions of the Government of India in the Delhi High Court, naming Genpact India (one of our subsidiaries) as a necessary party but without seeking relief against Genpact India. We believe that if Indian tax were due upon that transfer, it could not be successfully asserted against us as a representative assesse. Moreover, GE is obligated to indemnify us for any tax on its 2004 transfer of shares. On August 12, 2011, the Delhi High Court ruled that Genpact India cannot be held to be a representative assessee in this transaction. The tax authorities have filed an appeal with the Supreme Court of India against this ruling, which is pending.
In respect of certain of our transactions, including our acquisitions (which included our subsidiaries organized under Indian law or owning assets located there), internal reorganizations, the sale of our shares in our public offerings or otherwise by our existing significant shareholders, the Indian tax authorities may argue that Indian tax is chargeable in as much as the indirect transfer of Indian subsidiaries are involved in such transactions and may seek to impose tax on us directly or as a withholding agent or representative assesse of the sellers.
52
In 2012, the Government of India enacted legislation purporting to clarify the intent of existing tax law (and hence the law applicable in prior periods) to tax “all income accruing or arising, whether directly or indirectly, through or from any business connection in India, or through or from any property in India, or through or from any asset or source of income in India, or through the transfer of a capital asset situate in India”. The legislation, which we refer to as the Indirect Transfer Rule, also provides that an “asset or a capital asset being any share or interest in a company or entity registered or incorporated outside India shall be deemed to be situated in India, if the share or interest derives, directly or indirectly, its value substantially from the assets located in India”. “Substantially” has not been defined for purposes of the Indirect Transfer Rule. Public commentary on the legislation, including statements by various officials of the Government of India, has suggested that the legislation was intended to allow for the taxation of indirect transfer of shares in an Indian company, possibly with retrospective effect. The full implications and scope of this legislation, and how its provisions will be interpreted and applied are presently unclear, but arguably could apply to certain transactions involving the Company as noted above.
Because there are significant uncertainties relating to the application of the Indirect Transfer Rule to transactions in shares of non-Indian companies, such as the Company, that have significant assets and operations in India, it is not clear whether, or to what extent, a buyer of common shares of the Company could be held liable for not withholding Indian tax on the acquisition of such shares or be subject to Indian tax on gains realized on the disposition of common shares of the Company.
Furthermore, the Governments of India, the United States or other jurisdictions could enact new tax legislation, including anti-avoidance provisions, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. In 2012, the Indian government enacted anti-avoidance provisions, which are now proposed to be implemented with effect from April 1, 2015 onwards. More recently, the Indian government has enacted changes to taxation on distributions from Indian companies. The full implications and scope of the new anti-avoidance provisions, if implemented, and the recently enacted distribution tax changes, as well as how these changes may apply to us, are presently unclear. Our ability to repatriate surplus earnings from our delivery centers in a tax-efficient manner is dependent upon interpretations of local laws, possible changes in such laws and the renegotiation of existing double tax avoidance treaties. Changes to any of these may adversely affect our overall tax rate or the cost of our services to our clients, or impose additional levels of tax upon us, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities
None.
Use of Proceeds
Purchase of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
3.1
53
54
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Date: August 9, 2013
By: /s/ N.V. TYAGARAJAN
By: /s/ MOHIT BHATIA
55
EXHIBIT INDEX
ExhibitNumber
Description